Similar posts

SchrodingersDick #crackpot #sexist #homophobia #transphobia incels.co

[Blackpill] My theory on lesbianism and feminism.

(It’s kind of all over the place. Not meant to be an essay; I copy pasted what I wrote offhand in a group chat with some homies.)

Possible lesbian formula:

1: Ugly: can’t get chad, sexually unsatisfied, never experienced submission to a larger-than-life dominant man

2: High standards: only wants gigachad because she is aware of his existence. No other man can match up, doesn’t want anything less than the best she’s aware of. It would be settling but she doesn’t see it as settling. finds herself not attracted at all, so thinks she’s not attracted to men period, except for the exceptional men.. Keenly receptive to mogging. Also prob damaged from being ugly in high school. Had a bad time immediately after being thrust into the sexual market/adult social hierarchy as a low value female.. did not recover.

3: Low self awareness: doesn’t realize that her disgust of 99% of men doesn’t mean she hates men with very very few exceptions/flukes, just means she’s a normal, healthy eugenicist

I dont have any personal experience with lesbians, but I seriously doubt that if you were to put one (any girl really) in a room with a gigachad, that she wouldn’t get wet, submit, and love every second of it. “You know even though I’m a lesbian, I weirdly liked it teehee I’m quirky I had these feelings I can’t explain and I felt so safe” .. shit like that. MAYBE some robust high T lesbians wouldn’t like that.. like the masculine one in a dyke relationship..

And girls turning dyke faster and with less resistance than guys “turning” gay or coming to the conclusion that they’re gay could just be female to female dynamics being unlike male to male dynamics. Foids are ok in close proximity with eachother, sharing a mate and shit.. men in proximity with eachother are sexual competition and will kill eachother for eggs.

The default life strategy for women is to trade their looks for the best deal they can get. Whether this be through prosecution, marriage, onlyfans, dating, even applying to jobs while wearing makeup, getting promotions by being hot/putting out, etc... so the Formula for a feminist is just be ugly and unable to leverage your eggs to make it through life comfortably. Be unable to exercise the default strategy for a women because you have very little value to trade and hence can not trade it for a good enough deal.. Be unsettled by this and imagine a world with an alternate source of value for women, one in which you could be considered high value (mandatory that this value metric be malleable. Personality, career, education, sense of humor, emotional strength, etc)... And then campaign and screech for society to recognize some other, malleable, source of value for women, in which, conveniently, you would have value and power in the eyes of society and most importantly your own eyes. “Women are more than their looks” - says the ugly girl.. “men are more than their height” - says the manlet. Same principle as trannies thinking their problems will go away, they will get to live in a new world with a new, more enlightened metric of value, and they will accept themselves but only after everyone else accepts, validates, and entertains their delusions. It is expecting the non malleable to adapt to the malleable. That is not how adaptation occurs. Adaptation takes the path of least resistance.

It’s really a defensive reaction to learning an uncomfortable truth about personal value, it being non malleable, and the unequal nature of people’s value. The world being generally cruel and unlike what Disney said it would be. So the world must change and there is nobility in being on the front lines. And like kaczynski said, it’s an outlet for hostility and satisfies the need for power.

The ugly feminist will stop being a feminist if she becomes hot. She won’t believe any of it anymore and won’t care about women’s progress or w/e the fuck unless doing so conspicuously confers social status to her. Feminists don’t want to be feminists, they just want to be hot. Feminism/striving for an alternate source of value is the next best option for curing their low self esteem.

The manlet will stop saying “height doesn’t matter” if he gets taller, unless for the same reason the now hot former feminist still preaches feminism. And like the feminist, the manlet doesn’t really want height acceptance, he just wants to be tall. Advocating manlet acceptance/bluepill ideology is the next best thing for his self esteem/life outcome/sexual success.

I don’t have an explanation for hot feminists. Strictly status seeking/herd mentality/tribe acceptance, or seeking high value in both metrics, both in looks, and in malleable metrics. or the handicap principle is applied. “Teehee I’m a feminist that just so happens to be hot, And I think girls shouldn’t be judged on their looks, even though I’m judged positively on my looks.. I dont put effort into my looks (because I don’t have to) and I’m still hotter than you.. im more than just my looks, I’m beauty AND brains”. Still, I’d imagine a girl with conservative friends would assimilate their beliefs and attitudes pretty quickly. Bitches are like water.

Every fake aspect of a removed-from-reality worldview is either a convenient lie or a supporting lie to back up some other convenient lie. Most people are professional copers.

APieceOfFemShit #sexist reddit.com

The majority of people are degenerates. Unfortunately, no one is going to settle with a non-traditional atheist woman with the values of a conservative. I will then be single and without PIV for life. Masturbation and phone sex has been my only savior.

Now that women are slutty degerates, pretty women are now dominating the market with their forever expanding vaginas because ugly women have no leverage whatsoever in the game anymore. They have not only enhanced their bueaty with technology, but raised the beauty standard beyond any attainable reality for even average women. The only way an average woman can compete is spreading like mayonnaise. Average and ugly women are now lonely, suffering, getting fucked over and chopping their fucking noses off to not be considered subhuman. For an ugly woman the only option is 'fuck now' or I'm leaving for Stacy or an upgrade. Men are disgusting animals, and dumbass Stacy's have surrendered over what little power women had while simulitaneously making men worse than they already were, men these days have no standards whatsoever and will fuck anything and ultimately undateable. STD's, pedophila, fascism, white nationalists, violant black people, false rape, insane religious fundies, misogynistic freaks, whores, slutty deplorable males and green haired women are destroying our society and you wonder why I don't #justjoinin.

In spite of popular believe a sexual experienced man that has lot's of casual sex lowers his value to floor. Degenerate men that run through the gaping vagina coursel that believe opposite are in for a rude awakening when they get tired and coming looking for something different. When Rome falls this sub will be the last one standing, and they won't be accepting degenerates. I hope you fuckheads are happy.

"Now that women are slutty degenerates, pretty women are now dominating the market with their forever expanding vaginas because ugly women have no leverage whatsoever in the game anymore. They have not only enhanced their beauty with technology, but raised the beauty standard beyond any attainable reality for even average women. The only way an average woman can compete is spreading like mayonnaise."

I don't think this is true or at least I hope it isn't

I guess it depends where you live or some of the femcels on here are way, way below average

Sorry, but I have seen plenty of below average women with boy friends it might be your dating pool or where you're looking but just because a female is not a stacy doesn't really mean its all over for them

I'm serious, maybe try online dating or find a church

Ugly women don't actually exist as people. They existed behind 'Stacys', who are the representatives of our gender. When STACY fucks up, we all fuck up. And now that Stacies and higher tier women are spreading like mayonnaise for dudes, they expect this of ALL women, and if not, hypergamously move upward to more attractive women they can get it for free from. Unattractive women in order to compete have to either give up sex early on or subject themselves to subhuman treatment in order to be considered an eligible candidate. Sure, there are some moids that will date an unnatractive, average, hideous women, but they have ran a TRAIN through mentally ill Stacy's that have fucked them up for life, turned them into miosgynists with subhuman views of women and now think they can get 'saved' by some lower-tier woman desperate for love and dick. They are in for a rude awakening. I certainly don't want those fuckheads.

And you know what drained out Stacy can still doafter making misogynists? Get a non-misogynistic man.

I'm an atheist. I have no fucking interest in church.

Marina Orwell & commenters #racist #sexist orwellsdaughter.wordpress.com

Unfortunately, I only infrequently see non-porn/misogynist searches leading to my blog. This is because internet traffic is comprised near-exclusively of Walking Penises (Doormats with Holes are busy providing all manner of free labor — in addition to working as many, or more hours outside the home as their lazy, good for nothing dickwad counterparts). Since dickwads are usually busy searching for the most vile forms of violence against women that they can find, non-misogynistic searches rarely show up.

Random searches for 2016:

“white men hate white women” (I hope this gentle searcher found what she was looking for, especially since I’m the only White woman telling it like it is about the “white” male & his relationship to jews & other nonwhite males).

when his iq is smaller then his penis” (no comment).

“black and white picture with prince and 2 women naked” (You meant to search for “Prince Rogers Nelson and 2 midget whores” — Da Little Prince was only 5 feet tall).

“did prince nelson wear contacts” (this is the kind of thing lemmings want to know — details about a non-talent midget who “sang” about luvving his own penis so much that he imagined women wanted to be raped by him. Oh, & yes the little faggo-nig did wear colored contacts — so he could look “mulatto” instead of straight-ahead Afreekin — like his jew masters directed him).

“will niggers ever stop complaining” (I hope that this gentle searcher found a lot of information about the Negro problem on my blog. In case s/he didn’t: No, they will never stop complaining. Nor will they stop raping, murdering, thieving, & otherwise adding zero benefit to society. They only become fatter, uglier, more demanding, & dumber — hard to believe, but even with Whitey’s donation to the Negro gene pool — making nearly all Amurrikan “blacks” actually mulatto — they are the only mud race incapable of learning, or of feeling normal human emotions).

(alabasterass)
Re Neverending White Male Privilege
Thank you Marina for sticking up for us even tho white males have done nothing to help white women ever. When white males report black violence toward white females they always do it in the context of making their anti black points, not in the context of giving a crap about white females. Sometimes they even blatantly state that she deserved it because she was a “mudshark” even when there is no evidence of this.
I used to think that white women were disloyal to white men, mostly because of the very loud and very prevalent voices of women haters on the internet. They always claim that white women are disloyal but I’ve yet to see one white man on the internet who shows anything but disloyalty toward white women. Disloyalty, in fact, would be their kindest lack of positive emotion. Most have thinly veiled rage against white women and don’t even care that low intelligent black animals take this as an OK to do even more violence to white women.
I can see that the white male believes that he just deserves loyalty, respect, etc because he just does because he’s a white male. He still thinks he is king and I even think many dig seeing everyone else join in the hate toward white women. I even see that so called white nationalists say they mate with nonwhite females because they are white males and deserve to do whatever they want while women should be “put in cages.” For what it’s worth I hate the woman hating white nationalists more than even the black rapist apes. You really do have to wonder if these young white males have IQ’s in the same range as black ones. Or even lower.

(Orwell's Daughter)
alabaster: Thanks for your thoughtful comments.

This is what a world gone mad looks/feels like. It is a balkanized zoo where the most civilized (committing the least violent crime) are the only ones who are forced, against our will (aka “civil rights”) to have to live among those who hunt us down. White people don’t have any rights.

What’s better is that most White people believe we “deserve” this. The libtards measure “hate” by the “feelings” brought on by 50 years of constant jew media anti-White pounding. White libtards cannot fathom that “hate” can actually be measured — by the outrageously out of proportion NEGRO ON WHITE CRIME.

(AthenaTheBrave)
Hope you don’t mind me dropping a hot steaming pile of link on this here page:

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/the-bullies-of-black-lives-matter/article30746157/

“will niggers ever stop complaining” the answer is a definitive no, even in a huge liberal city with a BLACK POLICE CHIEF, during the Pride Parade after a “tragedy” in Amurrika, after they’ve cowed the organizers of said parade into obeying their list of bugfuck insane demands, made them the leaders of the parade, and halted the glorified street fair for over 30 minutes. If these fuckugly subhumans were in the US, they’d be shot execution-style for pulling this, and not necessarily by police, either. Fuck each and every one of them with a rusted chainsaw. I actually feel really sorry for the white gays who had to deal with this, ’cause at least some of them are funny and interesting.

Rollo Tomassi #fundie therationalmale.com

Next to the (abstract) terms of ‘Alpha’ and ‘Beta’, SMP and SMV are two of the more contentious placeholders for manosphere concepts. SMP is Sexual Marketplace and SMV is used to represent the relative Sexual Market Value of an individual within that SMP. There’s a lot to consider when when we attempt to define just what that ‘marketplace’ entails, but the point of contention for critics is that by valuating a person based on a perceived market state we dehumanize that individual. For those uninitiated to Red Pill concepts, a complete denial of any sexual marketplace is usually the first retort.

“People are People and everyone is special” or some variation of the nebulous individual’s uniqueness needing to be held as the benchmark for each case of ‘value’ are the common refrains. Even denying an observable, measurable marketplace altogether for fear of being ‘judgemental’ is part of the Red Pill critic’s predictable counter to the idea of a sexual marketplace.

However, the latent purpose of this denial is really a ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ tactic that keeps players ignorant of the system they exist in. Just as with the 49th Law of Power, deny the game exists and you can better play it.

As with all Red Pill truths, the awareness of where one fits into the scheme of the SMP, and accepting the sometimes cruel realities of it can be a bucket of cold reality for men (and women). The simple truth is that our capacity to valuate various stimuli in our environment has been a survival-beneficial adaptation for us.

Kings Wiki #sexist en.kingswiki.com

Many bloggers have theorized that men and women have different value in the sexual market place relative to age. This concept is commonly referred to as "sexual market value."

Under this theory, a woman's sexual value is highest from age 18 until about 27 years old. As a woman ages into her 30s and 40s, her sexual market begins to rapidly decline as she ages. In contrast, a man's sexual market value is lowest in his teens and twenties, and then gradually increases as he ages. A man's sexual market value does not peak until he hits approximately 36 years old. As men age into their 40s, the decline is much less rapid than women, in contrast to a woman's more rapid decline. The practical affect is that women stand the best chance of mating with a male whose value is high early in life, while men stand the best chance of mating with a woman whose value is high later in life.

Some have suggested that modern society, which pushes women into traditional careers, is not compatible with the reality of the sexual market value.[1]. By the time American women have graduated college and become established in their career, many are too old to bear children absent serious health risks.[2]. Notably, scientific studies have concluded that women are racing against a biological clock, as having children past the age of 35 is a serious risk.[3]. However, men can have children well into their 40s and 50s. [4]. This would seem to suggest that from an evolutionary, cultural, and biological standpoint, women benefit by bearing children earlier in life, while men benefit by bearing children later in life.

Rollo notes:

Now class, please address your attention to the critical 15-16 year span between a woman’s peak SMV and that of men’s. It should come as no surprise that this span is generally the most socially tumultuous between the sexes. The majority of first marriages take place here, single-motherhood takes place here, advanced degrees, career establishments, hitting the Wall, and many other significant life events occur in this life stage. So it is with a profound sense of importance that we understand the SMV context, and the SMP’s influence as prescribed to each sexes experience during this period.

At age 30 men are just beginning to manifest some proto-awareness of their sexual value, while simultaneously women are becoming painfully aware of their marked inability to compete with their sexual competitors indefinitely. This is the point of comparative SMV: when both sexes are situationally at about the same level of valuation (5). The conflict in this is that men are just beginning to realize their potential while women must struggle with the declination of their own.

This is the primary phase during which women must cash in their biological chips in the hope that the best men they can invest their hypergamy with will not be so aware of their innate SMV potential that they would choose a younger woman (22-24) during her peak phase over her. . . .

The confluence between both sexes’ comparative SMV is perhaps the most critical stage of life for feminine hypergamy. She must be able to keep him ignorant of his SMV potential long enough to optimize her hypergamy. In men’s case, his imperative is to awaken to his SMV (or his potential of it) before he has made life-altering decisions based on a lack understanding his potential.

Every man who I’ve ever known to tell me how he wished he’d known of the manosphere or read my writing before getting married or ‘accidentally’ knocking up his BPD girlfriend has his regret rooted in not making this SMV awareness connection. They tended to value women more greatly than their own potential for a later realized SMV peak – or they never realized that peak due to not making this awareness connection.

Franzop #racist reddit.com

The truth is they don't. The Italian and Irish immigrants and their descendants never fully assimilated into WASP culture. You can see differences in all sorts of metrics attesting to this fact. But, and this is very important, they have assimilated better than most other non-white ethnic groups because they are closer to us as kin and in disposition. And while their descendants are not necessarily where the WASP elite is, they're phenotypically indistinguishable to the casual observer. European-Americans are still in their ethnogenesis, and this can only occur during the span of several generations.

The Sour Grapes Song

Mainländer #sexist incels.co

You don't know the truth Chad still fucks your wife
You don't know the truth Chad still fucks your wife

Thrusting big cock into her as a JB
Oxytocin, pair-bonding love memories
An adoration against which you right now just can't compete

And the blackpill overthrows comforting lies
Cause when she looks at her first Chad there's an altered perception
And I'd pay for a JB, but they're Chad's exclusivity

You don't know the truth Chad still fucks your wife
You don't know the truth Chad still fucks your wife
Cause you don't know the truth Chad still fucks your wife

Betabuxxing now, this ain't ascending
Cuck is worse than incel
The way I wanna be, in love with a JB
Virgin, all to myself

And cucked love is bound to fail

You don't know the truth Chad still fucks your wife
You don't know the truth Chad still fucks your wife

And you are a huge cuck

JB Horn #fundie 216.98.236.20

["I'm doing a research project on misogyny in religion, and while I've found plenty of misogynist passages in the Bible, Qur'an, and Torah, I'm also looking for examples of women's rights in these texts. I've found what might be considered respect for women in the Qur'an, but I would really love to find some examples of women's rights in the Bible, too, so that my argument won't be one-sided. I'm writing a fairly subjective paper that won't end up "siding" with any one religion.

So if anybody could direct me to some passages in the Bible that refer to women's rights (in a positive light) that would be wonderful.

Thanks,
Meg"]


Hi Meg

The truth is that if you're a woman who does not care about salvation there are no rules in the Bible that concern you. If you want to have an abortion go ahead but we are bound to speak up for the innocent child you kill. And this is especially true since plan parenthood feeds and the public trough using our money to do your killing. I'm sorry but I go off on tangents when I think of the 50,000,000 children put to death in America for the convenience of the mothers. Makes the holocaust look like a drive by shooting.

Nope Meg God has no rules for you if you're not interested in salvation, you go girl. You show the world who's boss.

Ris_Eruwaedhiel #racist altright.com

Black people aren't going anywhere. No matter how much they hate white people, deep down they realize that they need white people to live a decent life.

A nation without white people - compare Rhodesia with Zimbabwe.

Most non-whites are tribal - they are Indian or Chinese or Egyptian first and foremost, and perhaps only. The US to simply part ATM machine part Wal-Mart. Some dream of taking over at least a portion of the US by their wretched tribe - The Reconquista of the US Southwest or Moslem dawah.

I don't know how this is going to play out in the long run. The civic nationalist ideals of Pres. Trump and Steve Sailer only exist among white gentiles.

COPE GmbH #sexist #pedo #psycho incels.co

[Serious] Daddymaxx & Daughtermaxx = ASCENSION

For those who want to betabuxx or reproduce, I have a new strategy for you that I've found today that will get you to reproduce with a prime JB.

1) Betabux a fertile female.
2) You're gonna be cucked anyways so try to find a chad that your wife will "secretly" fuck him, don't forget to make a contract with the chad to be discreet.
3) Hope that your wife's child will be a daughter.
4) Become a loving dad and subconsciously train your wife's daughter to fall in love with you.
5) Breed your wife's daughter at the appropriate age (if you're too late she might become a whore)
6) ????
7) PROFIT!!!

You will have a beautiful (chad genes) wife and healthy children because your wife's daughter doesn't have your genes.

Note for the IT cucks: "A person must be at least 16 years old, and at least five years older than the prepubescent child, for the attraction to be diagnosed as pedophilia."
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia - And don't you ever disrespect Islam, because our religion deems that it's halal.

chudur-budur #sexist incels.co

How to ascend: Bending the space-time continuum

After making the last post and after going through hours of self reflection and deep contemplation, I have come to this conclusion:

The only way to ascend is by bending the space-time continuum.​

Let me tell you how.

The space-time continuum theory of inceldom:
What is the most fundamental physical difference between a 400lb hambeast and a 15 yr old JB? The answer is space. A finite amount of lard takes a finite amount of space. An average 15 yr old JB occupies less than 2.5 cubic feet of three dimensional space, where a 400 hambeast will occupy 3~4 cubic feet. The difference is non-existing increase in volume if you compare with the amount of space occupied by the entire universe.

Again, what is the most fundamental physical difference between a 70 year old hag-whore and a 15 yr old JB? The answer is time. After 50 years down the road, all JBs that you are drooling over now will become 70 year old hag-whores. No escape. This 50~60 solar year is infinitesimally small time frame if you compare with the age of the universe.

Assume whores are particles in the universe (whore particles). We are suffering because we put too much emphasis on the differences of space-time entanglement over different whore particles.

How do I bend the space-time continuum?

Very simple, by watching BBW and Granny porns. You will not bend the space-time continuum itself, you will bend it in your mind.

Let's say, in terms of space, your current taste might look like this:

[thin, plastic-looking woman]

But your goal is to end up shagging one of these:

[fat woman with tatoos]

On the other hand, in terms of time, your current taste might look like this:

[young, flat-chested South-East-Asian woman]

But your goal is to end up appreciating this:

[very old woman with stretched labiae]

Now, how do you condition your mind? Very simple,

1. Conquering space: Keep watching what you are watching now, but gradually try to increase the body-mass of the whores. Let's say you are into 9/10 JB whores. Now try to watch some slightly curvy whores, then advance to full curvy, then fat, then full-figured and you will successfully end up appreciating 400lb hambeasts.
2. Conquering time: Keep watching what you are watching now, but gradually try to watch porns from a bit older whores. Keep increasing their age, at one point you will start appreciating 80 year old hag-whores like this:

[very old woman with grotesquely saggy breasts]

Some practical strategies:

1. Don't watch those porns in full stomach, if you throw up it will be a mess.
2. Watch them while you are drunk.
3. I know it's difficult, but try to imagine and immerse yourself while you are watching them. Being drunk will help.
4. Try to fap to what you are watching.
5. Don't go to sleep immediately after you finish watching, you might have suicide inducing nightmares.
6. Once you become used to fapping while you are watching them, try again fapping while you are not watching or drunk.
7. Practice, practice, practice. Did I say practice? Yea, keep fucking watching those BBW and Granny porns.

Hopefully, at a certain point all the windows to BBW and granny pussies will be opened to you and you will start to have deep conversation about life on okcupid with different gorgeous ladies like these:

[five broken image links]

Pros? Everything is a pros. They are beautiful, they are experienced (not just sexually, they are experienced in many other ways), they are knowledgeable, understanding, romantic, sympathetic, the list goes on ...

Cons? Zero, nothing, nada.

You gonna ascend boyos!! Celebrate!!!

[corpulent person dancing in what appears to be some Japanese TV show][a shirtless man wearing a strawhat twists his nipples, surrounded by American Football players in orange tricots]
[three men doing a goofy dance at an office party while a woman seems to put on pants in the background]

Berit Kjos #fundie crossroad.to

Question : The Veggie Tales are tremendously popular with our grandkids. My husband thinks that all animation, whether it is veggies or something else, is not good. What is your opinion? Is it right to allow non-humans to talk?

Answer:Berit's impression, which is not a researched answer: I have only watched the Veggie Tales a few times, but I remember two concerns. The first one has to do with the talking plants. Today's emphasis on planetary oneness and interconnectedness promotes the pantheistic idea that humans, animals, and plants all equal members of one global bio-family. Giving human characteristics to plants and animals encourages children to accept this unbiblical notion as more normal and compassionate than God’s ways.

Second, the "cool" language of some of the characters seemed rude and disrespectful. Since children tend to enjoy these assertive attitudes and rude messages, they are likely to remember and imitate them. I don't remember the episodes well enough to comment on anything else.

The following letters offer a broader perspective and some positive points. I continue to have reservations. Remember, lessons in good character may be useful, but if these lessons are presented in a context or setting that conflicts with the Biblical world view, they can confuse a child's understanding of both of reality and of Scriptures. This danger may be more serious than the benefit from the repeated reminders of a good habit. However, I can't validate my concerns until I find time to buy and watch a few more of the Veggie Tales videos.

Kings Wiki #sexist en.kingswiki.com

Oneitis is a situation where a man will become obsessed with one woman. Often the man is delusional and believes that a certain women is his "soulmate", and that he can't live without her. The man's obsession with this one woman virtually ensures that the relationship is doomed. Symptoms can include feelings of hopelessness, heart palpitations, dry mouth, depression, anxiety and an inability to seek out other romantic or sexual relationships. Oneitis is the opposite of spinning plates.

Troy Davis says that oneitis is "the high watermark of ‘blue pill’ thinking".[1]

The Great Gatsby contains one of the most famous instances of oneitis in fiction.

A partner or ex-partner of a woman with borderline personality disorder probably experiences the most severe kind of oneitis.[2] An alpha widow can also experience something like oneitis.

Heartiste describes the difference between acute and malignant oneitis as follows:[3]

Beauty + proximity = acute oneitis

Beauty + former proximity + memories = malignant oneitis

Rollo notes, "One of two things generally happen for the Blue Pill guy who gets his wish and achieves intimacy with his ONEitis girl. He either defaults to supplication with her, or his ONEitis idealization of her is dispelled, and she and womankind are brought back down to earth to mingle with the mere mortals. It’s important to really understand what ONEitis really is; an unhealthy attachment to an idealization."

He also notes that "part of Blue Pill conditioning is promoting the idea that the women men ought to pedestalize should base that idealization on intrinsic rather than extrinsic factors. You will find that some of the most pathetic guys with ONEitis will often pine over some of the least physically attractive women. I’ve stood in wonderment over the weeping and gnashing of teeth Blue Pill guys will display over women whom they exceed in SMV by as much as 2 points. That’s the ‘real’ ONEitis; when a guy who you know could easily do leagues better than his ONEitis girlfriend in the SMP is bawling over her, head in hands, because she’s his ‘One’. Looking at this from the outside we think ‘what the fuck man?’ and try to deductively reason with him about how much better he can do, but what we don’t wrap our heads around is that this guy was conditioned since his earliest years to believe that his ‘snowflake’ is unique in her intrinsic qualities."[4]

Illimitable Men writes:[5]

Oneitis is this dreaded genetic curse men get where they think they'll never get to pass their genes to such a high quality woman ever again, its like trauma of failing to secure/maintain a high quality woman causes a man to lose his collective shit/sense of reasoning and starts pedestalising the bitch. When you fuck other women, even if they are inferior to the woman you lost, your body is like "eh, genes getting passed on, fuck it." And that is thus how the oneitis is quelled. If you get it really bad you'll need more than one woman to move on, we're talking dozens. Voice of experience here. Fucking oneitis, the bane of mankind.

Various Incels #sexist #psycho incels.co

RE: [Blackpill] BLACKPILLSCIENCE: Dark Triad is HARMFUL for sub-8s

(anon)

Facial attractiveness as a moderator of the association between social and physical aggression and popularity in adolescents

Aggression was associated with a reduction in popularity for adolescents low on facial attractiveness. However, popularity did not decrease as a function of aggression for adolescents high on facial attractiveness.

The only way you can have non-hooker sex as a sub7 is to be a leftist feminist liberal betabux cuck with a decent job, a car and your own place.
You're still paying for sex if you're sub7 (betabuxxing) and the sex you get is pathetic starfish sex once every two months. It's still technically prostitution. These relationships are never based on true sexual attraction and love (only the man is sexually attracted to his "gf"/wife.)

Only Chad doesn't have to pay for sex. In fact, Chads often get approached by women. Chads with all types of personalities get laid, but there is some evidence to suggest that psychopath/criminal Chads have more sexual partners. Again, this only applies to actual Chadlites and Chads (tall 7/10+ PSL men.)

If you're a regular 5/10 5'9" NT normgroid, being anything other than a subservient low test beta will hurt your "chances" with women. Post wall women are only willing to settle with subservient leftist feminist "men" who will be their doormat and atm in exchange for birthday blowjobs and starfish sex once every few months when she doesn't have a headache. As soon as a cucked beta "male" shows any sign of masculinity or he attempts to be the man of the house he gets dumped and the whore finds another beta cuck.

(MountainGorilla)

Is there a solution? What now? Am I just going to be put in line by society as an ugly man? I have to conform to what society thinks of me, as an ugly man, that an ugly man can't stand up for himself against society? That an ugly man has to know his place like a good slave?

Fuck man, it's too brutal.

Think about it. You will never have a peace of mind. Society will always scoff at you, they will never leave you alone.

And if you dare try to change that in anyway, (dark-triad maxxing, gymcelling, etc.) society will kick you down. They'll always find a reason to drag you down like a bunch of crabs they are.

No amount of coping will ever erase that, that from the moment you first swallowed the blackpill. You can never take it back.

(Atavistic Autist)

It is bettER to be "unpopular" and met with a frown, than "popular" and met with a smile in the sense that you are an easily exploited, stepped on, and bullied kid who is made fun of without threat of retaliation.

We owe it to ourselves to Dark Triad maxx and get the same weapons in our arsenal of social intimidation and fear that our genetic enemies have used against us. It is not supposed to make soyciety like us. Fuck soyciety, and down with all social climbers!

(BlkPillPres)

Fear IS respect

Its the most important form of respect

"Love" is temporary, someone can "love" you for X reason and then stop "loving" you still even though you still have X, because something greater than X came along

Once someone fears you for X, they don't stop fearing you for X, fear is more imposing than "love"

KazChasey #racist city-data.com

Funny how your only rebuttal to the damning issue of rampant Black violence is to bring up White serial killers. One lone nut out of how many billion Whites in this world kills 19 in a lunatic frenzy a couple years ago and you're holding on to that as some kind of proof that Whites are just as violent as Blacks, meanwhile 19 Blacks have committed murder just in the time it took me to write this sentence. Get a grip and a semblance of proportion. Blacks commit a staggeringly disproportionate amount of violence and murders in this country and around the globe. Why are they so prone to it? Be honest with yourself.

Umm, look around you. Everything you have is thanks to the White Man. EVERYTHING. That computer your typing your nonsense on is thanks to the White minds that created it. Look in every Black nation around the world. Anything that's not made from mud and sticks is thanks to colonialism bringing civilized building methods over. Please tell me ONE thing of value that Blacks have built in those countries. Be honest with yourself.

Some Blacks who may or may not have been your ancestors picked cotton for a few decades. Get over it. What they did wasn't some history-altering feat of brilliance. They literally did farm work to the benefit of a few wealthy Southerners. The period of slavery in the U.S. is not even a blip on the timeline of history, yet you hold on to it as the defining moment in history. You're so stuck on it that you STILL can't get over it, centuries later.

SOME Blacks were slaves. Newsflash: Some WHITES were slaves during the course of human history too. So were Jews, Asians, etc. It's called HISTORY for a reason. It happened. MOVE ON and build a better future instead of dwelling on something that none of us today can change or are responsible for.

Your grandparents fought to get you the right to schooling and a better future, yet your kids run around your neighborhoods with eyes bloodshot from weed, mumbling incoherent nonsense, and shooting each other up over a quick buck. YOU failed yourselves. The opportunities that were afforded to you you've squandered, and rather than own up to your failures and learn from them, you insist on pointing the finger at the White Man. It's not the White Man making your children GD idiots who listen to violent, misogynistic, morally-bankrupting "music". It's not the White Man putting guns in their hands and making them kill their neighbors over pieces of paper. It's not the White Man teaching them to mumble in ignorant gibberish and forsake education. And even if it were the White Man goading your kids into all of that, it's your fault for being so weak and ineffectual to say "No! My parents/grandparents/great-grandparents fought hard and sacrificed everything to give me these opportunities. I will NOT throw them away!"

You failed yourselves. Deal with it.

JB_Calgary #fundie christiannews.net

Let me understand... Billions of years" ago, "nothing" exploded, for no reason at all (defying scientific law in the process). Out of this "explosion of nothing, that was caused by nothing, came everything". It rained on the rocks and life appeared from non-life, (again defying scientific law in the process).

From this wild speculation came invertebrate fish, which "evolved" into vertebrate fish, which "evolved" into amphibians, which "evolved" into reptiles. Some reptiles "evolved" into mammals and some mammals "evolved" into Humans. Meanwhile, some reptiles, dinosaurs, "evolved" into birds.

That is the summary of my religious world-view and seeing as we are really just descended from pond-scum, from a random, cosmic accident - Not purposeful design by an intelligent Creator,- There is nothing wrong with butchering unborn children, Rape, Murder, Peadophilla, Theft, Nazi Holocausts, Cambodian Killing Fields, etc. It's just "survival of the fittest".

We came from nowhere and we're going nowhere.

Pancake Loach #fundie pancakeloach.wordpress.com

Feminists are literally the worst people in America – especially if you judge them by standard “social justice” metrics.

Let’s do the link roundup first:

Insty: “[Feminists are] horrible, damaged people who want to address their own problems by making other people suffer.”

Which is in reference to this Extremely Long Slate Star Codex piece, called “Untitled“. Caution: explicit reference to feminist hypocrisy, power-mongering, and general ugly hatefulness abound, complete with actual facts showing that the feminists are liars and they know it.

But you know, besides all the usual hypocrisy and naked power-grabbing going on by the feminists referenced in the above piece, all I could think about was that a man had come forward, saying that feminism nearly caused him to commit suicide, and DID cause him to beg his therapist to approve his castration, and all the feminists had was yet more social disapproval, scorn, and hate for him. (Kudos for the therapist saying no, the problem is not your heterosexuality.)

By the way, young males have the highest rates of suicide of any broad demographic in the country.

FEMINISTS. ARE. KILLING. PEOPLE.

And not just the millions of murdered babies. Do you think that Scott Aaronson is the only young male who heard loud and clear feminism’s message that male = worthless monster? That heterosexual desire is to be despised and rejected? (Not even Christian ministries to “pray the gay away” are as vitriolic about homosexual desire as feminists are about male heterosexual desire.) If anti-homosexual attitudes are even partially culpable for the suicides of homosexuals, then how much more culpable must feminists be when they teach vulnerable young men who are socially awkward but otherwise perfectly nice to hate themselves so much they want to DIE?

Feminists are monsters. Anyone who is not a monster and identifies as feminist is identifying AS A MONSTER. They need to be corrected, because all the non-monstrous people identifying as feminist are providing cover for and enabling the damaged, sociopathic bullies who form the core of feminism. As Vox Day says, “Feminism is a Satanic, anti-Christian, anti-reason, anti-science ideology that destroys literally everything it touches and everyone who embraces it. Reject it and its adherents the way you would reject someone offering you plutonium on their bare hands; to accept it is to begin to die a slow and painful death.”

Next in the roundup: a response by a female nerd, saying a lot of things I’d like to say, like “fuck you, feminists” – and pointing out how feminists also like to bully other women.

However, there’s no way for logic and reason to get through to a feminist. They are raging beasts, roaming about looking for people to devour (and if you are not any of the above, you should get out before you become one; the ideology is designed to lead you gently along the path to Hell, step by gradual step). So instead, let’s see some advice for nerds in another Insty roundup. These links – and the links in the links – are incredibly useful advice for more than just bullied nerds, so make sure to spawn those additional tabs! (Some of those links in the chain were idea-fodder for yesterday’s post, and I’ve only just got around to reading more of them myself, so go thou and also read.)

But here’s the problem: the shunning part only works for the Shy Male Nerd after he has grown up and gotten a job and moved out of the house. Which means that for his entire childhood and his most vulnerable adolescent years, he’s going to be immersed in a toxic sea of feminism, because feminism is the dominant ideology of mainstream America. What if his mother is a feminist, like the one described in the Rant of the Female Nerd, above? Kind of hard to shun your mother when you’re entirely dependent on her (and she’s probably already driven your father away or “henpecked” – the cute name for domestic abuse when a woman does it – him into a doormat).

This is where I go back to the introduction and tie in the “feminists are the worst people in the America by social justice metrics” point. Feminism is the ideology of institutional power in 2015 America. Feminists control education, from female-dominated primary schools all the way through higher education; cross feminist dogma and you’ll get in deep trouble, as Lawrence Summers found out. The head of UVA used the excuse of a false rape accusation in order to punish UVA’s fraternities for something that never happened. Kangaroo courts convened by universities routinely and blithely ruin male students’ lives – when men are already a minority in higher education. The government gives special benefits to women and convenes special task forces and institutes special social services for them – the courts even give female criminals lighter sentences. The media constantly trumpets the female-centric tenets and attitude of feminism (when they’re not fanning racial tensions) and derides anyone who dares to disagree.

Social justice warriors like to define racism as “racial prejudice plus power.” Those of us who aren’t ideologues looking to excuse the despicable behavior of protected in-groups laugh at the “plus power” part, but when you look at modern society, it is WOMEN WHO HAVE THE POWER, and particularly feminist women and their male allies (who may be amoral creeps out to use feminism for their own ends). Ordinary, non-feminist successful women get absolutely demonized for not toeing the feminist line whenever they dare to attract public attention, and any non-feminist male (as well as insufficiently servile feminist males) can count on truckloads of vitriol. Meanwhile, feminists defended the most powerful man in the world as he betrayed his wife, his daughter, his intern, and who knows how many other women in his past.

But this litany is just to point out that even by their own SocJus metric, feminists are the oppressors in today’s America. Their bigoted, sexist ideology wields power through the federal government, social welfare policies, the court system, all levels of institutional education, and corporate policy when it comes to employment or even use of social media, due to the combination of feminist regulation from the government side and fear of social media mobs on the public relations side.

Scott Alexander compares feminist bigotry to anti-Semitism in “Untitled” – if you don’t have time to read now, just skim down for the pictures of men with beards. It’s uncanny how close those images align, isn’t it? But I don’t think of feminism as patterning after anti-Semitism quite yet – especially since the beard thing is merely one small facet of masculinity that feminism attacks. I think feminists are actually more like Jim Crow Lite. After all, they’re using some of the same arguments as the KKK – and they stand for government-mandated privileges for women, and penalties for men. They haven’t actually gotten around to putting their “kill all men” or “reduce men to 10% of the population for breeding purposes” yet the way the anti-Semitic Nazis backed up their prejudices with violence, but they’ve definitely got the “institutionalized discrimination by government and society” part down pat. Thus, Jim Crow Lite.

It’s true that there are, in fact, worse ideologies running loose in the broader world today. Communism, its fraternal twin socialism, and their adopted brother Islam, for example. But I’m not convinced that feminism isn’t their little sister, just waiting until she’s all grown up and firmly grasps the levers of power before she starts outright murdering the targets of her hatred. And as far as America goes? Feminism is definitely doing the most damage.

(And now, for a tangentally related palate cleanser after peering too closely into the abyss – a modest proposal from Dalrock.)

IHateRoasties, footballsubbing & lickmytushyhole #fundie reddit.com

Re: Based parenting

image

In reaction to a LADbible article titled
“Mum Wants 14-Year-Old Daughter To Get Plastic Surgery Because 'Ugly People Get Nowhere'
She doesn't care about her education and is encouraging her to follow in the footsteps of influencers instead.”

(IHateRoasties)

this is NOT based. This is degenerate and her looksmatch is roping atm. Good morning, I hate women.

I wish my Mum gave me HGH, paid for plastic surgery and helped me truly maximise my looks when I was younger. That Mum is 100% right and people don’t like that because it goes against the grain.

Theres a big difference. You are a guy. You have one tenth the SMV of your looksmatch. You need a surgery in order to do anything, a girl doesnt.

Really isn’t any difference the benefits are just magnitudes larger. If I was a girl I’d still wish my Mum helped me maximise myself, if I didn’t want to be a influencer it’d still help me in every other aspect of life. Job interviews are usually given the any attractive girl.

if you were a girl youd have two thousand orbiters and wouldnt give a fuck about lookism, plus you can use fakeup

Makeup is still a form of lookism for girls. There’s also a huge difference between a foid and an attractive foid in terms of benefits.

(footballsubbing)

this is NOT based. This is degenerate and her looksmatch is roping atm. Good morning, I hate women.

Can't agree. She ain't wrong is she?

You might not like it but this is blackpilled as fuck.

(lickmytushyhole)

I see nothing wrong with this. Truancy is fascist bullshit. Props to the mom

BabyFuck McGirlsex #sexist incels.co

[ToxicFemininity] How any girl can become a Millionaire by age 25

DIVORCE RAPE

* Marry a rich bluepiller in your late teens then divorce him after 2years
* 18 - 20 first marriage, divorce rape him and get half of his financial assets
* 20 - 22 play the victim and say you were the perfect wife and lie and slander your cucked ex-Husband and say he was pure evil. A cucked betabuxxer will marry you and you can divorce rape him after 2 years and take half of his assets
* 22 - 24 move to another state or even another country. Since foids are biologically wired to be big liars , you can lie and say you are a virgin ("i broke my hymen by riding bicycles and playing sports Teehee"). Also lie and say you have never been married. Then marry a bluepilled normie who thinks all foids are infallible angels then divorce rape him after 2years

ONLYFANS

* If you run an onlyfans for 7 years straight (18 - 24) you will make thousands upon thousands

TINDER

* Foids can get free meals and free gifts from thirsty guys on tinder. As such, there is no reason why a foid would spend any money on food or clothes. Over a period of 7 years(18 - 25 years) this translates to thousands upon thousands of dollars saved.

eTHOTDOM

* Being a boobie streamer on Twitch, foids can make obscene amounts of cash. Foids can make thousands upon thousands by selling their bath water, their used panties, their used tampons, their footpics e.t.c.

GRAND TOTAL

* So, over a period of 7years (18 - 25 years) if you add up all the money that a foid can accrue from the above mentioned low IQ acts, that total amount of money can easily exceed ONE MILLION DOLLARS.

WHY THIS IS RELEVANT TO THE INCEL CINEMATIC UNIVERSE DISCUSSION

[scales]

* Nature strives to exist in a state of equilibrium - kinda like balanced scales.
* As such, assuming that one side of the scale represents the amount of power foids have sexually, then the other side represents the amount of power males have in the sexual marketplace.
* Seeing the insanely large amounts of benefits and power that foids have in the SMP for just existing - it shows that the scales are tipped in the foids favour in ALL facets of human endeavour.
* Meaning that males, especially sub5 incels are suffering and have little to no benefit in the SMP, and also in life in general.
* The more power foids gain in society the less power subhumans (80% of all males globally) will have.
* ITS OVER AND IT WILL NEVER BEGIN

SchrodingersDick #sexist incels.co

The collapse of civilization is happening in your lifetime. Feminism caused it. There is no coming back from this. Long post.

Expanded upon another post of mine in another thread.. been meaning to post this for you all. I kinda suck at writing so it might be all over the place. There’s a TL;DR down below but I put a lot of effort into this so I’d appreciate if you took the time to read.

For the cucktears lurkers, before you shit on this, Take a step back and look at the world in the context of just another sexually dimorphic mammal species to understand the following.

Civilization is inherently a patriarchy. They are the same thing. One cannot exist without the other. In order for a civlization to exist, female sexual nature (hypergamous genetics-based mate selection) must be kept in check, for men to be treated equally and fairly, to allow for all members to have hope that if they contribute, they can be rewarded with guanrateed breeding right over a female of their choosing. In this sense, it is necessary for the success of a civilization that women be sexually oppressed.. this developed world is a man’s thing and will only ever cater to men. It is our creation for the benefit of all, but mostly genetically subpar, men. It’s all built at the expense of women’s vaginas. Any society in which women have free mate selection can not function. In tribal times, there was 1 sexually successful man for every 17 sexually successful women.. assuming a 100% female sexual success rate, that leaves 94% of men sexless. This is important. If it weren’t for this fact, we wouldn’t have a problem and this site wouldn’t exist. We need to replace genetic currency with something else in order to appease all men and make it possible for everyone to contribute and build something great.. Money was invented. Money must represent survival in order to be worth anything. It must replace the baseline definition of survival meaning a big strong male able to kill other males in a fight. Well we have a police force for that now so no need to worry. But most importantly, it must be able to be used as leverage to purchase pussy under the guise of survival. That’s the only way to keep the male population happy. Without it, women have to reason to mate with subpar men.. This system is inherently oppressive to women. Unfortunately for them, this system favors survival over reproductive success. Everyone survives and procreates but at the expense of females carrying and birthing inferior DNA. Survival is not enough for them. The idea of 1:1 male to female mate pairings guarantees that all the females not paired with a high SMV male with be with a low SMV male and produce genetically poor kids (which is why they are repulsed by low SMV men, which is why rape only exists with low SMV men, but you knew this already, no need to expand), something that disgusts them on a primitive level. It’s a system they need to get rid of.. hence the sexual liberation, fighting for rights, fighting for a right to work, etc. no matter how hard men try to keep a society strong and prosperous, women will actively try and tear it all down.

This snowball formed when women were given rights.. it started a snowball effect. Now there are several things that compounded with each other make for a nightmare scenario for the world.

1: women in the work place. Women earn their own money now. A Man’s resources cannot be used as leverage to purchase reproductive rights with a female. Thus his contributions to the tribe are meaningless as his reward holds no value.

2: genetic misrepresentation and contraception. Estrogen frauding Makeup, plastic surgeries, gym to build a high estrogen ass.. all these things are being used to falsely elevate women’s sexual dimorphism, perceived serum estrogen concentration, age, fertility, etc. notice how every foid does makeup the same way. Thin narrow nose bridge, shadows under the zygos to show zygo projection, rounded chin makeup, eyeliner to fraud thick eyelashes (health indicator).. women are walking around looking like top tier specimens the likes of which would make your caveman ancestors balls explode. Tbh they should bow down to partiarchy that they’re able to walk around like this alone and not immediately be gangraped when they step out of the house looking like they sweat pure estrogen and fertility. And lastly contraception.. things like birth control, condoms and abortion make casual sex and being a whore consequence-free. It’s the reason the cock carousel exists.

3: easy access to a global sexual market. The tribe is no longer a handful of guys and girls with the top guy doing all the fucking. Smartphones, Tinder, Instagram, cars, planes, buses, etc all help make the sexual marketplace a global thing.. in essence it’s an 8 billion member tribe, with easy access to all types of chad dick. Far more competition among males and a far lower sexual success rate among the male population.

4: destruction of religion. Religion isn’t really a thing anymore. It was once a powerful tool to convince women that 1:1 mate pairings are what’s to be expected, no sex before marriage, shit like that (had other reasons too. Keeps men’s testosterone at bay, thou shall not kill, steal, etc. keeps things civil) .. They had a reason to abide and ignore their primal instincts. It did a pretty good job.. now that’s gone, and there’s virtually no way of enforcing monogamy and chastity. Which funny enough, is also the only prerequisite for a woman to get married.. just be a virgin. They can’t even manage that yet a bunch of captain save a hoes are quick to wife em up, and these hoes will wear white on their wedding day symbolizing their purity.. jfl

Compound these 4 new phenomenon together, and you can quickly see that the sexual market is fucked, and a society with a SMP like this cannot sustain itself.. This is a world that belongs to women now. This world automatically excludes all men unfit for reproduction. In this case, it’s likely over 99% of men. What will these men do once they realize money doesn’t buy pussy? Once they realize that if there’s truly no hope for them, they can rely on government assistance, or work a menial bottom tier job just to make enough to survive. If these men even have the drive to go to work, they will have no drive to innovate, get promotions, invent something, become millionaires, etc. you’ll have a lot of complacent men with no motivation to contribute anything. Best hope automation can replace the entire workforce, and if not, then you got a work force made up of 99% women and just lmao if you think that’s gonna take us anywhere. Women have no incentive to make money other than to rid men of their only leverage and open up their prospective mating options. Same deal with them.. they’ll just aim to make the minimum amount to survive and genefraud enough to land 6’4” chad.

This results is a catalysmic shift of the world as we know it.. there will be a total collapse once the number of men who drop out of society reaches critical mass. But until then, you will see a shitload of people dependent on government assistance, the rich being taxed out the ass, who now have even less incentive to keep perusing high paying careers, more people coping with drugs/alcohol, a spike in suicides and mass shootings, high SMV men forming harems, etc.. basically 2018 x10.

For this to happen, It’s not even necessary for the masses to swallow the blackpill.. it’s only necessary for them to realize money doesn’t mean anything anymore. That’s all it takes. Put simply, one’s contributions to society are no longer worth the effort. It’s basically slave labor at that point.

So there you have it. All the causes are there and cannot be reversed.. things have already been set in motion. just wait till the effects of them become painfully obvious. This cannot be fixed since nobody is gonna accept that women’s vaginas are the reason for this. Maybe next time around men don’t fuck up and start the civilization off strong with commoditized pussy. This will all go down in documented history so a mistake like this likely won’t repeat itself. That’s the good news.

This should be lifefuel for you all. You are witnessing the collapse of the most successful civilization on earth in YOUR lifetime. Pretty cool. So ditch your ER plans, untie your ropes, and Sit back and watch the world burn.

TL;DR; a couple rights here and there and a few apps destroyed the world. Patriarchy, religion, and commoditization and sexual oppression of women are paramount to the existence and survival of any civilization. We lack all 4. It’s over. Bunker up and stockpile food and ammo. We’re going back to the jungle.

anarchyst #conspiracy #racist holocaustdeprogrammingcourse.com

If a country were hell-bent on genocide, WHY WOULD THEY KEEP RECORDS?? WHY would they build “camps” hundreds (if not thousands) of miles away with sanitary facilities, housing, medical and other ancillary facilities. Would it not have been easier to just “eliminate” them without going through all of this trouble? The jewish communist Bolsheviks did just that with the non-communist civilian populations of the conquered countries in the communist orbit.

Something BIG “stinks” in this whole jewish “holocaust ™” deal. It is no secret that jewish Zionists made “deals” with the Nazis in order to make life “uncomfortable” for jewish Germans.

The establishment of a “homeland” was a Zionist “dream” since the 1800s. What better way to encourage “emigration” to a barren land than to make things difficult for the “cream of German society” (jews)?? The TRUTH about the so-called jewish “holocaust ™” is out . . .

The so-called jewish “holocaust ™” has been turned into a de-facto “religion” in which no deviation from orthodoxy is permitted. In fact, in most European countries, independent investigation into jewish “holocaust ™” truths is strictly forbidden under pain of fines and imprisonment. In the USA, things are not quite as bad, only job loss and personal and professional destruction at the hands of those of the “tribe” that FEAR the real truth of the jewish “holocaust ™” being exposed is evident.

When the truth about this historical event comes out, it will change much of the world’s perception about those that are using this event as a “cash cow” that “keeps on giving”. . . “there’s NO business like “SHOAH business”.
Jewish complicity in this event is carefully “covered up”.

It is curious to note that jewish interests will hunt down and imprison a 90 plus year-old German “camp guard” while looking the other way when their “own kind” was involved in truly brutal actions. Camp “capos” and “sonderkommandos” (who were primarily jewish) come to mind. Not one of these jewish “collaborators” has been brought to (jewish) justice. I guess blood is thicker than water.

A good example of present-day censorship is the fate that awaits those that dare question “official” jewish “holocaust” orthodoxy. Most European countries have criminalized ANY line of thought that deviates from the “official” jewish “holocaust” story. WHY?? In fact, TRUTH is no defense when it comes to “all things holocaust”.
Ask noted WW2 researcher David Irving, who was forced to recant TRUTH in order to avoid punishment. . .

If people only knew of the planning that took place (among those of the “chosen”) to engineer the jewish “holocaust”, there would be a pogrom of massive size. You see, the jewish “holocaust” was necessary in order to force the establishment of a jewish state. In this case, the ENDS justified the MEANS. There have been many “holocausts” of much greater misery throughout human history, yet the jewish “holocaust” is the only one that counts . . .

Most jews will never be satisfied with knowing that those that commit evil deeds on earth in this lifetime will pay for it in the next life . . . they have taken vengeance from the Creator and appointed themselves the exacter of vengeance (in contradiction to mosaic law but not their anti-gentile talmud).

Most jews are vengeful people that will never pass up a chance to “make a buck” by screwing a gentile (goyim) out of money or property. jews were hated in Germany for taking advantage of the non-jew Germans between the two world wars. The average German did not have a pot to piss in while his wealthy jewish neighbor was trading food for land . . . taking advantage of the jewish bankster situation in Germany.

Look at the “commercialization of the so-called jewish “holocaust ™” while the much larger communist (true) holocaust is conveniently forgotten. To assure a continuing supply of jewish “holocaust ™” “survivors”, jews are tattooing their ATM (oops, I mean “camp” numbers) on their children and grandchildren.

Since the jews declared war on Germany in 1933 (yes, 1933), the Germans had no choice but to complete the Zionist plan of marginalizing German jews (to say the least).. This fulfilled the Zionist plan of forcing German jews to emigrate to Palestine while making the world grant jews a “homeland”–Israel.

Zionists have been predicting a jewish “homeland” for the last two-hundred years while predicting a “holocaust ™” of 6 million for the same amount of time. The ACTUAL number of non-combatant deaths in the European theater of operations is approximately 731,000, NOT 6 million (official International Red Cross figures).

Regarding that “holocaust ™” “showplace” Auschwitz, there are engineering inconsistencies in the design of the so-called “gas chambers”. The doors are not of a gas-tight design; it would have been impossible to retrieve the bodies, and there is no means to ventilate the rooms after the so-called “gassing” took place”. From an engineering standpoint, these are very serious errors that would have caused the deaths of the “operators” of these supposed “gas chambers”.
American execution expert, Fred Leuchter travelled to Auschwitz, surreptitiously obtained samples from the purported “gas chambers”, had them tested and published his results. The absence of methylene blue in ALL of the samples, save one, was PROOF that the “gas chambers” did not exist. The one positive sample was taken from a room used to disinfect clothing.
Mr. Leuchter was rewarded for his search for TRUTH by his professional and personal character assassination by those of the “tribe”. He lost all of his federal and state contracts, and was prosecuted under an obscure Massachusetts “law” for “practicing engineering without a license”–a law which had never been used before or since. . .

It is no secret that after WW2, the Soviets attempted to “create” the “death camps” for propaganda purposes. Yes, there was extreme deprivation and suffering–many people perished. However, the prime cause of death was typhus. As allied bombings destroyed most of the infrastructure, typhus was at epidemic levels. THIS is what caused the massive amounts of human deaths . . .NOT gassing.

After the end of WW2, these same “camps” were used to intern German civilians. These German civilians were subject to much greater deprivation and suffering than the previous “occupants” of these “camps”. In fact, jews were controlling these camps, at the behest of the Allied forces, and were vicious in their treatment of those interned. In fact, the German civilians were defined as “disarmed enemy combatants” so that Geneva Convention rules did not apply to them.

shii410 #sexist incels.co

RE: [News] Eight low SMV men were arrested for raping a 16-year-old foid...and taping it and uploading the video onto Facebook

The sharing of the video on Facebook suggests the perpetrators were “proud of what they had done and wanted to display this for others to see — and that in itself is disturbing,” said Vanessa Volz. “It’s obviously horrific and completely unacceptable and I think very indicative of how we still are living in a rape culture,” Ms. Volz said.

maybe if women didn't use sexual appeal as a metric of men's worth & routinely shame men for being sexually unsuccessful, that wouldn't be the case. just a thought

Relampago Furioso #fundie returnofkings.com

Will There Be Riots In America The Day After Donald Trump Wins The Presidency?

(photo snapped in Ferguson as thugs burned the city down)

The above photo was snapped in Ferguson as thugs burned the city down. Could we see a repeat of that fateful event and perhaps a worsening of it soon to a city near you?

The election is the focus of every news channel ad nauseum. But few people are focused on the day after the election. No matter who wins this year’s presidential “selection” the possibility of civil unrest the day after election day and beyond is a real possibility. Are you ready for chaos if it develops?

The nation is so divided we are likely to run into problems.

The ugliest scenario for the day after election day plays out if Trump wins. If Trump wins, get ready for Black Lives Matter, the Black Panthers, The Race (La Raza) and other racially motivated anti-white groups to come out and possibly start burning cities down again. After all, they have been given carte blanche all year long to do so in Ferguson, Baltimore, Charlotte, and San Jose. A worrisome precedent has been set.

Of course, Trump won’t be in power the day after election day (we have to wait until Inauguration Day for him to clean up any potential messes) so Barack Hussein Obama is likely to give the racial hate groups the green light once again while the media whips out their collective Stradivarius, plays my heart bleeds for thee, and sympathizes with the devils destroying the nation.

If Hillary wins, there’s the real possibility of protests the day after the election, and the social conditioning of whites to be polite and docile even as they’re railroaded in what was formerly their nation may not hold this time around. A Hillary win means the chaos and possibly violence could wait until she starts stripping constitutional rights away. Then, we are likely to see conservatives finally come out and start raising some righteous hell. There could be racially motivated clashes on the horizon as white people standing up for themselves goes against a long-established narrative that they’re all evil racists.

Few people think of the effects civil unrest could have on their livelihood and well-being. It’s time for a little education on just how thinly stretched the American supply chain is, and what could happen with only a short-term disruption in it.

Here’s a scenario – just one of many possible scenarios. Video of rioters stopping and then looting a semi tractor-trailer in Charlotte is worrying because if trucks stop, America stops. If attacks on truckers happen often enough, truckers may decide it’s not worth the risk to their lives to continue moving freight around and stop driving. Within a day, bedlam could ensue as the supply chain runs on a razor’s edge in modern America and everything from food to medication to gasoline starts running out.

Supply Chain

According to the American Trucking Association (ATA) a disruption of 24 to 48 hours means hospitals and nursing homes would run out of food. Fuel supplies at gas stations would also run out in that time frame. Garbage would start to pile up. Most grocery and retail stores would start to run out of food and merchandise. ATM and bank cash supplies would also run out.

The tight rope the corporate system walks quickly breaks when merchandise stops moving.

As an example, the ATA tells us this is what happens during a hurricane. Imagine what would happen with days or weeks of rioting in major cities.

In a hurricane situation, supplies that would normally last a few days, such as water, powdered milk, and canned meat, typically disappear within one day. Given these inventory rates, this means that perishable goods could be depleted in a matter of days and non-perishables in just a few days. Runs on food and non-food staples during hurricanes, and even before big winter storms, provide a good example of how fast some retail inventories can be depleted during panic buying. The same quick depletion of inventories could occur if trucks stopped making deliveries for any reason.

Panic buying means no food on the shelves. When people don’t have food at home and then the grocery store doesn’t have food, rioting will intensify. Things could get ugly in a hurry as one small disruption leads to a domino effect, after which Bedlam ensues.

So, it is best to be prepared with non-perishable items just in case things get out of hand. Have at least several weeks food supply on hand. But, how do you stop people from coming and taking your stash?

Be Armed

Contrary to gun propaganda from the media, you absolutely want to be armed in the event the election and its aftermath don’t pass peacefully. What happens when stores no longer have food and gas stations no longer have gas? Gangs form looking for homes that do have those items.

They’re going to pick out the weakest home in the neighborhood and pounce.

A home with guns is a safe home. Just as this YouTube video shows, armed thugs may bust into a house looking for money or food, but they started jumping through plate glass windows and scrambling like cockroaches once the homeowner came out with guns blazing.

Several handguns with extra ammunition are advised. Know how to use them. Be steady with the trigger. And don’t be afraid to use them if looters come to your house.

The police will NOT be there to protect you as they’ll have their hands full with the chaos.

Better To Be Safe Than Sorry

With the meltdown of America happening right before our very eyes, we are entering an unstable period in the nation’s history, to say the least. No matter who wins the election the nation we once knew and loved is passing away. Trump may be able to turn things around temporarily, but even if he does the country now has so many immigrants it will be impossible to assimilate them all.

We are entering a period in which America will resemble a third world country more and more. The demographics of the nation are being changed on purpose so white people are diminished at the ballot box and Democrats will gain a lock grip on the levers of power in the nation in the coming years. Divisions between rich and poor will grow, and the evil media will be there stirring the pot with racial, class, and gender division every step of the way. Peace will become a thing of the past as squabbling factions compete with each other for dominance.

In this transition from prosperity to despotism, it is best to be safe than sorry. The day after election day will be telling in that it will set the tone for the next four years. It may be a somewhat peaceful turn towards Communism if The Bitch wins, or it may not be.

But my money is on a steady degradation of civil society in the coming years. Tend your own garden, as I know I will be tending my own. My military friends are already discussing what will happen in SHTF scenario. You should be thinking about it, too.

MentleGentlemen098, Suck-Less & xNOM #sexist reddit.com

(MentleGentlemen098)

I think women are raised to think they're superior, especially when they're young, could be a curse in disguise

To start this off, I want to say that even the title make it seem like it, I'm not intending this to be a misogynistic post, so it's not like "Roastie hit the wall hur dur". This is just an observation made by me, so im trying to make it as neutral as possible.

Now that we're clear, let's get started

I think in general, it seems that women are the ones that have all the advantages in the world, especiallY when they're young. And this is because they're kinda raised to have that mentality. This is just my observation based on how my experience in a household of mostly women.

I don't know how to explain this but I feel most women are raised to "look down" and be judgemental on a lot of men. They're kinda taught to be "reserved" and "non confrontational", while at the same time quitely(and sometimes openly with other women) judging others(especially men) in their head. They separated them into categories like creep, background furniture, and hottie. Men do this as well, but the extent of the judgement is nowhere near this much. We do it honestly and openly, and any men who does his are labeled as sexist snd shallow, and most men ill likely reflect on that and change themself. In contrast, women who are caught doing this will likely not do it publicly, but in their head, they will reluctantly withdrawI purely because it's socially inappropriate to appear shallow and not because it's actuallu wrong. I know not all women are like this, but the stereotype isn't there for no reason.

For example, I know this one girl in a STEM field who sometimes complain about her dates to me. She said her first date was with a dorky nerd guy from her field. He emphasize on that a lot and she kinda makes the fact that he wears sandles to the date a pretty big deal. I questioned her on why did she make such a big deal and she responded with something along the lines of "oh, im not supposed to make this a big deal? Sorry :P"

I think this may actually be a curse in disguise as well. The reason they're unhappy will be 100% from their own doing, even though their situation is perfectly fine already, since they fail to see men as actual human, and more like an object that disappoints them. They're inablity to realize and change their shallowness, and try to hide it on top of that is also a curse as well. There are many shallow and misogynistic men who have grown up and actually lived a happier life when they finally see women as human being, but the same cannot be said about these women. Instead of sweeping out the filth, they sweep it in the rug even more, and they will suffer that background "itch" for the rest of their lives because nothing will ever satisfy them.

Honestly, if they could break out of the cycle, people would being happier, both the men and themselves as well

(Suck-Less)

I’m sorry but I thought it was self evident that women are raised to think they are superior in all aspects of human existence. In schools boys get a 30% lower score compared to girls for exactly the same answers, how could they not think they are smarter? Communication in Western society is define by how well men can read her mind. Emotional maturity only applies to men, women having temper tantrums is considered healthy, men crying in pain is considered weakness.

We have entire generations raised and educated almost exclusively by women with near no male guidance.

Whenever women get their asses handed to them in any field, the answer is always sexism... because women have been raised to think there’s no other way an inferior man could have just blown them away in competition.

So, now, men are relegated to being disposable ATMs and manual labor, while women wonder “where have all the good men gone, they are tired of lowering their standards.”

Yea, thought it was self evident.

Edit: I’m talking American women, your culture may vary.

(xNOM)

I’m a female and the anti male jokes when men aren’t around is just boring as hell. I don’t think women know how good the have it (in the west). I don’t mind men making fun of women, it would make the women mocking men more palatable, if it was a two way system. Nothing wrong with banter, we are completely different.

Well this is the problem in a nutshell. Women don't banter. They gossip, comfort, and backstab. They have an in-group preference for women exactly because of this. The rules are different. They cannot handle male rules. Men cannot handle female rules. This used to not be a problem because men and women lived in separate worlds.

Banter is direct. It requires a sense of humour and, most of all, a recognition of one's own faults in a public way. That's why it's funny. Women are not funny. They want to be protected from public criticism. This is why you can't state basic facts in public anymore, like: women are horrible at controlling motor vehicles. That's "sexist."

Ferdinand Bardamu #racist eurocanadian.ca

The White race’s intelligence and behavior has been under intense selective pressure since late medieval times. These new environmental forces significantly increased White resilience in the face of adversity. The first of these was the Black Death that ravaged Europe from 1347 to 1351. As one of the most catastrophic pandemics in world history, it killed off one-third of Europe’s population. The evidence of bioarchaeology, drawn from skeletal analysis of burial remains from “Black Death” cemeteries, reveals that far from being random, the plague was very selective in its choice of victims (DeWitte, 2014). The weak and the elderly were at increased risk of infection. Given the strong correlation between poor health and IQ, the Whites who survived were much stronger, healthier and smarter than ever before. The dearth of peasant labor led to an increase in wages, rising living standards and the invention of labor-saving devices. This greater wealth and prosperity liberated many from the common drudgery of daily life. A century after the Black Death, the Renaissance scaled even greater heights of intellectual and artistic achievement.

The 17th century colonization of North America also subjected Whites to strong selective pressure. The first Englishmen to have disembarked on American soil had survived religious persecution in England as Puritans objecting to the “Roman idolatry” of Anglican ritual; they had survived the perilous transAtlantic voyage, unaffected by typhus or scurvy. In New England, the Puritans still had to contend with disease, the harsh winters and the “merciless Indian savages” that lay hiding in the primeval forests of the eastern seaboard. If the weak and unintelligent managed to survive the voyage, they would eventually be killed off by starvation or Indian tomahawk. This pattern of eugenic selection affected all English settlers, including those motivated by purely secular and commercial interests. By the end of the colonial period, the Anglo-Saxon in the Americas had emerged as one of the finest and most evolved specimens of the White race.

The purifying effects of eugenic selection had rapidly accelerated the evolution of Homo sapiens in Europe and North America: the fittest White men had always left behind the most offspring, but after the ravages of bubonic plague and the hardships of American colonization, their broods became larger, healthier and more intelligent. White men of lesser ability, if they were lucky enough to find mates, typically left behind few descendants, with fewer still managing to survive past childhood.

A significant increase in the population of intelligent Whites inevitably led to a rising per capita rate of innovation. This peaked in 1873, during the reign of Queen Victoria (1837-1901), but declined rapidly after that (Huebner, 2005). With the new science and technology, the White man was able to raise incomes, improve public health and increase longevity across the Western world. Eugenic selection for higher IQ made it possible for the White man to develop more sophisticated military technology. This far surpassed anything that had ever been developed by the ancient Greeks and Romans or even non-Whites. By century’s end, approximately 84% of the earth’s surface was controlled by the colonial empires of Western Europe. Intellectual and creative development had scaled such heights that Europe even gave birth to a race of intellectual supermen. These were the Victorian polymaths, who numbered among their ranks the colorful Sir Richard Francis Burton (1821-1890). He was a man who excelled at every subject that commanded his undivided attention. He was a brilliant writer, scholar, explorer, geographer, translator, diplomat and swordsman. A master linguist, he spoke an astonishing 40 languages and dialects fluently. This period of continuous White evolutionary development wasn’t to last forever. By 1914, the golden age of White intellectual and creative superiority had come to an end.

II: Western Intellectual Decline from Late 19th Century to Present

The general intelligence of the Western industrialized nations has declined since late 19th century, according to a meta-analysis of over a dozen reaction time (RT) studies. A cognitive, but not an economic or thermodynamic, limit has apparently been reached. There are now fewer individuals with the intelligence to solve complex mathematical and engineering problems, which is why the rate of innovation has significantly decreased since 1873. “Genetic g” - g-factor in the absence of gene environment interaction - has decreased by 14 IQ points over the course of a century, at least in the Anglophone nations of the UK, USA, Canada and Australia. This means a decrease of 1.23 IQ points per decade (Woodley et al., 2013). To eliminate the possibility of overinflated RT latencies because of hardware and software lags (Woods et al., 2015), the meta-analytic findings were adjusted for lag time. The result was that the Victorians were still faster (and smarter) than modern Western populations (Woodley et al., 2015).

Measures of vocabulary, relatively insensitive to environmental influence because of greater overall gsaturation and heritability rate, provided additional evidence of superior Victorian intelligence. A study tracked WORDSUM item frequencies over the course of 150 years. For this, a database that stored 5.9 million texts from the 1500s to the present was used. The most difficult and therefore the most highly g-loaded WORDSUM items exhibited sharper declines in historical usage since mid-19th century, consistent with declines in “genetic g” observed among Western populations (Woodley et al., 2015).

After decades of “massive IQ gains,” cognitive reversals were observed in Norway (Sundet et al, 2004), Denmark (Teasdale & Owen, 2008), the Netherlands (Woodley & Meisenberg, 2013) and elsewhere. In one study, genes associated with educational attainment and cognitive ability had declined in frequency across birth cohorts in an Icelandic population. It was estimated that a loss of 0.3 IQ points per decade would substantially affect Iceland if allowed to continue for centuries (Kong et al., 2017). James Flynn, discoverer of the eponymous Flynn effect, has acknowledged the reversal of cognitive gains in certain Western countries, especially those of Scandinavia. At a 2017 conference hosted by the International Society for Intelligence Research (ISIR), he admitted: “I have no doubt that there has been some deterioration of genetic quality for intelligence since late Victorian times.” Flynn has projected substantial losses of about 6 or even 7 IQ points for Scandinavia over a 30 year period. Such a reversal in intelligence would have catastrophic effects on the societies and economies of Scandinavia, now being flooded by hostile elites with Third World “migrants.”

A relevant question is: “If the post-WWII consensus acknowledges the existence of massive IQ gains over the last century, how does one explain cognitive reversal in the most industrialized nations?” This phenomenon is known as Cattell’s paradox and its solution is Woodley’s co-occurrence model. Although phenotypic intelligence has increased since WWII, genotypic intelligence has decreased. The anti-Flynn effect is really a “Jensen effect” because it has resulted in losses on psychometric g.

III: The Role of Dysgenic Selection in Western Intellectual Decline

Mass “immigration” from low-IQ regions of the globe, such as the Middle East, South Asia and Africa, have no doubt contributed to declines in the average intelligence of the West. In one recent study (Woodley et al., 2017), Third World “immigration” was associated with IQ declines in 13 different nations. High levels of Third World “immigration” are always significant predictors of Western cognitive decline; its most pronounced effects are on IQ subtest batteries with the highest g-loadings. Nevertheless, Third World “immigration” does not fully account for dysgenic selection among Western populations. Declines in genotypic intelligence occurred long before the advent of Third World “immigration,” which only partially explains the Western world’s declining IQ.

The greater fecundity of intelligent Whites, compared to the unintelligent, had always been the norm, especially since the 1400s. This changed during the Industrial Revolution; more intelligent Whites delayed having children until later in life, through a combination of abstinence and contraception, to further their educational aspirations and develop their innate potential. Medical breakthroughs significantly improved general health and nutrition, which prolonged human lifespans. This allowed less intelligent Whites to survive childhood and have significantly more children than those who were more intelligent. The rise of social welfare liberalism in the 20th century merely exacerbated this trend. As Western governments progressively taxed their wealthiest and most intelligent citizens, their wealth was unfortunately redistributed to less industrious and less intelligent members of the White race, who squandered the money as they multiplied recklessly.

More recent studies have shed further light on the negative correlation between intelligence and fertility. In one study, the higher the intelligence and socioeconomic status of adolescents, the lower their likelihood of having offspring. This dysgenic effect was more true of females than males, indicating that women become choosier the more wealth and status they accumulate (Reeve et al., 2013). Among adults, a negative correlation between intelligence and odds of parenthood was discovered; every 15 point increase in a woman’s childhood IQ would decrease a woman’s odds of parenthood by about 20% (Kanazawa, 2014). The female role in the transmission of intelligence is a substantial one because the genes for intelligence are X-chromosomal; if more intelligent women since the late Victorian period have had less children than the unintelligent, one can only expect a gradual decline in the national intelligence of Western populations.

Analysis of a large genealogical database revealed that Iceland’s national IQ had decreased over time because more intelligent Icelanders were having less children. Although IQ declines per decade were small, statistical significance is attained when viewed from an evolutionary timescale. Dysgenic fertility may potentially undermine Icelandic economy and society within a few centuries, unless it is reversed (Kong et al., 2017). Polygenic scores, which capture selection against g (such as dysgenic fertility or “immigration”), are the most significant predictors of the century-long decline in “heritable g” (Woodley et al., 2018). The “neurotoxin hypothesis,” like all environmental explanations, fails to adequately predict temporal trends in general intelligence because cognitive ability is under much stronger genetic than environmental control. The worst environmental deprivations (i.e. severe malnutrition) or the most costly and ambitious environmental interventions rarely, if ever have a lasting effect on heritable g.

Most experts in intelligence, cognitive ability and student achievement now attribute the anti-Flynn effect to dysgenic fertility, Third World “immigration” and worsening educational standards in Western countries; in contrast, they are far more unanimous among each other in attributing environmental causation to the Flynn effect, in striking agreement with Woodley’s co-occurrence model (Rindermann et al., 2016). Based on the evidence, Western intellectual decline is largely caused by a negative IQfertility gradient, with Third World “immigration” becoming an increasingly significant contributor as time goes on.

IV: The Road to “Idiocracy”

Nobel laureate William Shockley proposed a Voluntary Sterilization Bonus Plan (1972). He presented this as a “thought experiment.” This would be open to all members of the American public, regardless of “sex, race or welfare status.” For each IQ point under 100, the recipient was to be given $1000, as long as he or she was willing to undergo vasectomy or tubal ligation. This was not an original proposal, as it had been first suggested over 40 years ago by American journalist and scholar H.L. Mencken, albeit in a rather humorous context. What all of these proposals neglect, and what modern eugenicists have failed to acknowledge, is the obvious sex differential in contributions to dysgenic fertility, probably because of the natural sympathy that men typically have for the opposite sex.

The low-IQ male, unless he is among the 20% of males considered physically attractive, is permanently excluded from the sexual market. This is because of his lifelong inability to acquire the material resources that allow him to compensate for his genetic inferiority. On the other hand, the low-IQ female poses a far greater threat to the mental hygiene of Western populations, by virtue of her role as sexual selector. For the low-IQ female, there will always be large numbers of reasonably attractive males willing to satisfy her many sexual and financial needs. If the low-IQ male must be handsome or rich, the low-IQ female must only be of childbearing age if she wishes to attract a mate of fairly decent genetic quality. The Industrial Revolution brought with it substantial improvements in public health and nutrition, making it easier for low-IQ females to survive childhood, only to breed as much as possible throughout their reproductive years.

When, in 1869, Sir Francis Galton made his famous scientific prediction of declining Western intelligence based on anecdotal observation of changing Victorian demographics, what he really observed was more low-IQ females than ever before surviving childhood to satisfy their instinctive desire for maternity. This trend has continued without interruption to the present, making low-IQ females the primary driving force behind the dysgenic fertility that has resulted in declining general intelligence in Western industrialized nations. No successful eugenic policy can exist without taking this into full account. In order for Dr. Shockley’s proposal to have made any sense from an evolutionary perspective, the bonus for females should have been quadrupled or even quintupled for each IQ point under 100.

Into this volatile mixture was added feminism, a pernicious ideology that grants both unrestricted individual autonomy and reproductive choice to women who should not be allowed to breed for eugenic reasons. In recognizing that all women have the same rights, feminism reveals itself to be just as dangerous as the Third World “immigration” promoted by hostile elites. By encouraging low-IQ females to engage in promiscuity, march in “slut walks,” wear “pussy hats,” and breed prolifically - while high-IQ females delay parenthood because of their educational aspirations - feminism has merely accelerated the decline in general intelligence among Western populations, already well under way since the Industrial Revolution. As Whites get dumber, their “Western uniqueness,” including their high intelligence, creativity and ability to produce more geniuses than any other race of people, will disappear with them. This radical transformation of the underlying genetic structure of Western populations could take place within less than a 100 years. Few people recognize the fragility of Western intellectual gains because of selective pressures exerted by the Black Death in Medieval Europe and the 17th century colonization of North America. By undermining Western mental and racial hygiene, feminism threatens to return Whites to the way things were before the agricultural revolution of the Neolithic age.

Helmuth Nyborg, extrapolating from present trends and projecting them into the future, allows us to better visualize in concrete terms the post-apocalyptic scenario that awaits Western civilization (2011). He shows what happens when a racially homogeneous society like Denmark, with a population of over 5 million, is subjected to both “Internal Relaxation of Darwinian Selection” (IRDS), referring to the preservation and multiplication of the genetically disadvantaged, and “External Relaxation of Darwinian Selection” (ERDS), in reference to “super-fertile” Third World “replacement migration.”

When both internal and external relaxation are combined, “Double Relaxation of Darwinian Selection” (DRDS) is produced, a clear and unobstructed path to Western “idiocracy” in Denmark. By 2072, ethnic Danes will be reduced to 60% of the population, from a high of 97% in 1979; minority status will be reached by 2085. In 1979, Danish phenotypic IQ was 98, but by 2072, it is 93, having dropped 5 IQ points in less than a century. As national IQ decreases, Denmark will be gradually transformed into a Latin American “banana republic.” Ethnic Danes, demoralized by feminism and social welfare legislation, will have no choice but to acquiesce to the destruction of their own country. Significant damage to the economy and educational infrastructure are to be expected; a 5 point drop in Danish IQ means a 35% reduction in the nation’s GDP. Democracy will inevitably become unsustainable as average national IQ plummets below 90; it will be replaced by the authoritarian political culture and religious dogmatism found in Middle Eastern, African and Latin American societies.

Belief that “more White babies” are the answer to dysgenic fertility among Whites is just as dangerous and genocidal as the liberal belief that Third World “replacement migration” is “cultural enrichment.” Since low-IQ females leave behind more offspring than those of high IQ, more White births would reduce high-IQ females to an “endangered species.” This would intensify the “Internal Relaxation of Darwinian Selection” already occurring in Western populations. As Whites “devolve,” they will no longer be able to maintain their own Western industrialized societies. A demographic transition of such magnitude would transform Western Europe and North America, the Occidental heartland, into a cultural and biological extension of the Third World. Since women are loyal to wealth and power, but not race, one can expect genocidal levels of miscegenation between White females of low intelligence and the non-White foreigners who have dispossessed Whites and conquered the West.

To reverse the process of dysgenic selection, the White man must do three things:

He must get rid of the hostile elite.

He must forcibly repatriate all Third World “migrants,” including their descendants. Forced “remigration” is not an unrealistic policy; mass population transfers have been successfully carried out before, i.e. deportation of Germans, 1944-50, from Eastern and Central European countries to Germany and Austria.

If selective pressures in medieval Europe and colonial America led to the steady eugenic improvement of Western populations, making it possible for them to conquer 84% of the globe’s surface, only their re-emergence will reverse the dysgenic selection that has bedeviled the White race since the mid-19th century. This can only be accomplished through a rigorous application of classical eugenic principles.

If the White race is to survive, only its strongest and most intelligent members must be prepared for the harsh Darwinian struggle that lies ahead. Wasting precious resources on mental and genetic defectives is sheer pathological altruism. Race-conscious Whites have a collective interest in raising healthy and intelligent offspring, but no such interest can exist when it comes to those who are weak and unintelligent. They are “life unworthy of life”; even they would not consent to such a truncated and meager existence if given full possession of their normal faculties. From a White nationalist perspective, to bring such children into the world is selfish and morally irresponsible; they impose unnecessary fiscal burdens on Whites and use up resources that are better invested elsewhere.

The race-conscious White man is faced with a dilemma: because of liberal elite hostility to his own ethnic genetic interests, any program of eugenic enhancement would be outlawed under the current totalitarian leftist order; at the same time, he cannot simply wait out the elite-managed decline of Western civilization. In less than a few generations, most of his race may become drooling mental defectives, if they haven’t already miscegenated themselves out of existence into the burgeoning mass of Third World “migrants” who now infest his homeland. If he must take action, he must take it now, otherwise all is lost.

Race-conscious Whites must abandon all leftist-controlled urban areas to “live off the grid.” By colonizing relatively unpopulated areas of North America and Western Europe, the White man will return to a rustic existence, filling the countryside, the mountains, the forests, the tundra with Whites only settlements, similar to the Boer-only settlement of Orania in South Africa. Living the way his ancestors did centuries ago will ensure that no Third World “immigrant” follows him into the mountains or the wilderness. Self-imposed hardship will further intensify Darwinian selective pressure on Whites, jumpstarting the process of natural eugenic enhancement, just as it did during the early colonization of the Americas. Once race-conscious Whites have become sufficiently numerous, they must embark on a program of state-sponsored eugenics. This will be used to strengthen the White population until they are able to wrest control of North America and Western Europe from the hostile elites and their army of greedy “migrants.”

The new ethnostate will be constitutionally grounded on Aristotelian political philosophy and neoDarwinian biology; it will be a meritocracy based on eugenic principles. Eugenics, the scientific ideological core of the new White nationalism, is easily reconciled with the aristocratic political science of Aristotle; both are concerned with the development and formation of the best possible citizen, one along genetic and the other along characterological lines. Aristotelian philosophy is based on a linear hierarchical conception of reality; this overlaps with the dominance hierarchies of the animal kingdom and of all human socio-political organization. Furthermore, the capacity for superior moral development is improved substantially by superior genes. In an Aristotelian political order informed by eugenic principles, the state would ensure that all citizens have both the mental and physical capacity to live the good life. Mandatory genetic screening would be one of the conditions of citizenship; those at risk of transmitting hereditary diseases or conditions, such as criminality or low IQ, would undergo compulsory eugenic sterilization. Only the best and most virtuous citizens, the biologically and intellectually superior “aristoi” or natural-born aristocrats, would be the ones allowed total freedom of action in the political sphere.

In the ethnostate, the aristoi of the White race will determine who must give birth and who must be sterilized. These men are not petty bureaucrats, but aristocrats selected on the basis of health and IQ. Their sole task is the promotion of White racial survival, whatever the cost. For those who believe eugenic sterilization is barbarous and cruel, allowing the birth of children who suffer from mental retardation or cystic fibrosis is much, much worse. For this reason, only the healthiest, high-IQ females will be allowed to breed, even being massively incentivized to do so. Encouraging the natural increase of healthy, intelligent Whites, at the expense of the low IQ and genetically unfit, is the most White nationalist thing a White man can do for his race.

Some will necessarily object: “But state-sponsored eugenics will infringe on individual rights and freedoms!” This is a common, but groundless objection. The “right to procreate” is not an absolute. In 7 utilitarian ethics, rights are never ends in themselves; they exist to maximize the happiness of the greatest number and must be tempered by social obligation. Furthermore, not all men have the capacity for individual freedom. The Greek philosopher Aristotle recognized the existence of natural slavery because of the inability of some to reason autonomously, even though they may be responsive to reasoned instruction. Whether a man is free or not must be determined by his capacity to reason (for us, his IQ).

Legislation regulating some of the most intimate areas of our lives is hardly controversial; if we allow government to enforce this legislation, ostensibly in the interest of public safety, why not allow government to decide who gets to reproduce and who doesn’t? If the low IQ and genetically unfit are allowed to breed recklessly, as they do now, Western civilization will eventually be reduced to smoldering ruins. Unregulated breeding is far more dangerous than any black market specializing in the sale of illicit firearms or drugs. Society would be much safer if it allowed every citizen to acquire large arsenals of weapons without special licensing, but criminalized the marriage and procreation of the low IQ and genetically unfit.

If a large minority of race-conscious Whites emigrate, seceding from the leftist totalitarian state to independently pursue their own racial interests, reversal of dysgenic fertility and Third World “immigration” may be accomplished within a few generations. As race-conscious Whites strengthen their race through genetic enhancement, the totalitarian left will get weaker, forced to increasingly rely on low-IQ Whites and “migrants” for manpower. From their bases in the Pacific Northwest or Lapland, race-conscious Whites, stronger and more intelligent than ever before, would raid globalist-occupied territory, slowly enlarging their own dominions until the reconquest of North America and Western Europe has been completed. This is not without historical precedent. Medieval Spanish Christians, reduced to a small area of their own country, seized the emirates of Mohammedan Andalusia one by one, until the last emirate of Granada had been defeated, its Moorish inhabitants expelled from the Iberian peninsula in 1492.

Race-conscious Whites must live, think and breathe race, just as they did during the long and distinguished reign of Queen Victoria, when Whites were at the peak of their intellectual and artistic powers. In this age of drab multicultural uniformity, the White man’s race is his most formidable weapon, a thorn in the side of those who wish to replace him with the low IQ peasant masses of the Middle East, Africa, South Asia and Latin America. Nothing terrifies the hostile elites more than the prospect of encountering race-conscious White men bred for superior intellect and physical strength, able to aggressively pursue their own racial interests undeterred by elite and non-White hostility.

Larry Solomon (a pen name) #fundie biblicalgenderroles.com

7 Ways to Discipline Your Wife

Discipline toward your wife should always start with the gentlest approach first and only move toward harder forms of discipline if the gentle approach does not yield results. Warnings should always be given before harder types of discipline are implemented. You should always pray and seek the Lord’s guidance before bringing these types of discipline on his wife.

Here are 7 ways you can discipline your wife if a gentle rebuke does not work:

#1 For Disrespect

If your wife is speaking in disrespectful and demeaning ways in public in front of others (whether this is toward you or others) this might require a public rebuke of her tone and actions.

#2 For Overspending

If your wife is spending money against your wishes – this may require confiscation of her credit cards and ATM cards. Of course this can be done in measured amounts. Perhaps you might just take away one or two cards that she has abused and if her spending continues to get out of control you would move toward removing the ATM card as well. This does not necessarily mean she would have no money, but you could give her a cash allowance each week.

#3 For failing to care for your children or contradicting your authority with your children

If your wife is failing to do her duties as a mother toward your children or she is continuing to contradict your authority with the children then perhaps you might put off buying that new car for her and have her continue driving her older car for a while as long as it is safe for her to drive. If you have to purchase another car – you could downgrade the type of car she will be able to get or buy her a used one instead. Maybe you put off the purchase of that new dishwasher she has been wanting.

#4 For too much TV watching

If your wife is watching too much TV you could cancel the cable or satellite TV and just have antenna service.

#5 For too much online time

If your wife is spending too much time online (like Facebook or other social outlets or online shopping) then if she does not respond to your warnings about this you could change your internet code on your router so that her devices will not have access to the internet.

#6 For neglect of the home

Maybe your wife is not watching too much TV or spending too much time online but she is still neglectful toward her duties in your home. If your wife is being neglectful of her duties to care for your home then you might put off that new living room furniture set you have been talking about or those new window dressings she has been wanting.

#7 For sexual denial

If your wife is un-submissive in the sexual arena and chronically denies your sexual advances (without legitimate medical or psychological reasons for doing so) then perhaps that upcoming trip you were going to take her on gets canceled. Maybe that wardrobe upgrade your wife was looking forward to gets downsized or canceled. The Bible says a man has to supply his wife with clothing, but it does not say it has to be the expensive clothing she wants!

Some of these disciplinary procedures may affect the family as a whole, but sometimes it is necessary to do this in an attempt to bring your wife to repentance.

These are just some examples of non-abusive ways that a Christian husband can discipline his wife in a way that honors God and his design for the home.
Conclusion

God not only give husbands the power to discipline their wives, but he also gives them to the duty to do this. Men should not discipline their wives out some sort of power trip or prideful arrogance. Instead men should discipline their wives from a place of love in order to bring about holiness and order in their homes. Even if a wife rejects her husband’s discipline as Israel did God as her husband – he should still discipline her and pray that God will bring his wife to repentance.

Todd Friel #fundie blogs.christianpost.com

There are two groups of people who should not be shocked to discover that a member of the Duggar family is a sinner: Christians and non-Christians. Surprisingly, both camps seemed to be surprised by this revelation.

That is what makes the Josh Duggar story a disaster.

Christian surprise

The subject line from an email sent by a popular Christian website stated: “Christian world rocked.” Really?

Based on his own admission, Josh sinned, repented and got saved. Why in the world would Christians be appalled to discover an unregenerate 14-year-old boy acted wickedly?

According to Josh himself, “I sought forgiveness from those I had wronged and asked Christ to forgive me and come into my life.” Sounds like a pretty typical conversion story to me.

Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor homosexuals, nor thieves, nor the covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers, will inherit the kingdom of God.

Such were some of you; but you were washed, but you were sanctified, but you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and in the Spirit of our God (I Cor.6:9-11).

Have we forgotten that the Apostle Paul was a murderer before God saved him?

It is a trustworthy statement, deserving full acceptance, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners, among whom I am foremost of all. Yet for this reason I found mercy, so that in me as the foremost, Jesus Christ might demonstrate His perfect patience as an example for those who would believe in Him for eternal life (I Tim.1:15-16).

Josh is no worse than the Apostle Paul. Josh should not be shunned by Christians; he should be comforted by Christians who are just as wicked and just as forgiven as he is. Josh is nothing more, and nothing less, than a story of God’s amazing grace.

Non-Christian Surprise

Here is the headline from the magazine that decided to go rooting though Josh’s closet: “Bombshell Duggar Police Report.”

This might be the bigger tragedy of the Josh Duggar story: unbelievers consider it a bombshell when it is discovered that a Christian has a shameful past. This ought not to be.

If we Christians were doing our job proclaiming that the Gospel is for sinners, of whom we are the foremost, the world would yawn when it discovered that Josh was a hound dog.

If Christians were as loud about the Gospel as we are about being the moral majority, I suspect there would be five results:

1. Unbelievers would not see Josh Duggar as a hypocrite; they would see him as a typical born-again believer who is forgiven by an amazingly gracious God.

2. Unbelievers would not see Christians as a mere special interest group that seeks to impose values on other people.

3. The Gospel would be shining brightly.

4. Somebody might get saved.

5. Josh Duggar and his family would be going about their business today as a typical Christian family saved by grace alone.

Unfortunately, it doesn’t seem that any of those things are happening. I don’t blame the world; I blame us.

Is it possible we have become so obsessed with imposing our values on unbelievers that the world sees us as self-righteous Pharisees and not as blood-washed sinners?

Have we been so consumed by the culture wars that we have failed to engage in the spiritual battle for souls?

A Gospel Opportunity

Josh tendered his resignation to the Family Research Council and they accepted it. While none of us know all of the details, if Josh were in my employ, I would not have accepted his resignation.

I would have shouted from the rooftops, “If you think Josh is wicked, you should meet the rest of us! That is why we are Christians! We need forgiveness for being wretched, vile, wicked rebels. If you are a rebel too, Jesus died for you! Run to Jesus! Join the wretched club.”

Let’s not squander this opportunity to share the great good news that Jesus died for perverts, liars, thieves, drunkards, abortionists, Wall Street fat cats, skid row bums, suburban housewives, blue collar workers and every sinner who will come to Him in repentance and faith.

Josh Duggar’s story is more than a Gospel tragedy; it is a Gospel opportunity. Don’t waste it.

biblicalgenderroles #fundie biblicalgenderroles.com

7 Ways to Discipline Your Wife
Discipline toward your wife should always start with the gentlest approach first and only move toward harder forms of discipline if the gentle approach does not yield results. Warnings should always be given before harder types of discipline are implemented. You should always pray and seek the Lord’s guidance before bringing these types of discipline on his wife.

Here are 7 ways you can discipline your wife if a gentle rebuke does not work:

#1 For Disrespect
If your wife is speaking in disrespectful and demeaning ways in public in front of others (whether this is toward you or others) this might require a public rebuke of her tone and actions.

#2 For Overspending
If your wife is spending money against your wishes – this may require confiscation of her credit cards and ATM cards. Of course this can be done in measured amounts. Perhaps you might just take away one or two cards that she has abused and if her spending continues to get out of control you would move toward removing the ATM card as well. This does not necessarily mean she would have no money, but you could give her a cash allowance each week.

#3 For failing to care for your children or contradicting your authority with your children
If your wife is failing to do her duties as a mother toward your children or she is continuing to contradict your authority with the children then perhaps you might put off buying that new car for her and have her continue driving her older car for a while as long as it is safe for her to drive. If you have to purchase another car – you could downgrade the type of car she will be able to get or buy her a used one instead. Maybe you put off the purchase of that new dishwasher she has been wanting.

#4 For too much TV watching
If your wife is watching too much TV you could cancel the cable or satellite TV and just have antenna service.

#5 For too much online time
If your wife is spending too much time online (like Facebook or other social outlets or online shopping) then if she does not respond to your warnings about this you could change your internet code on your router so that her devices will not have access to the internet.

#6 For neglect of the home
Maybe your wife is not watching too much TV or spending too much time online but she is still neglectful toward her duties in your home. If your wife is being neglectful of her duties to care for your home then you might put off that new living room furniture set you have been talking about or those new window dressings she has been wanting.

#7 For sexual denial
If your wife is un-submissive in the sexual arena and chronically denies your sexual advances (without legitimate medical or psychological reasons for doing so) then perhaps that upcoming trip you were going to take her on gets canceled. Maybe that wardrobe upgrade your wife was looking forward to gets downsized or canceled. The Bible says a man has to supply his wife with clothing, but it does not say it has to be the expensive clothing she wants!

Some of these disciplinary procedures may affect the family as a whole, but sometimes it is necessary to do this in an attempt to bring your wife to repentance.

These are just some examples of non-abusive ways that a Christian husband can discipline his wife in a way that honors God and his design for the home.

Conclusion
God not only give husbands the power to discipline their wives, but he also gives them to the duty to do this. Men should not discipline their wives out some sort of power trip or prideful arrogance. Instead men should discipline their wives from a place of love in order to bring about holiness and order in their homes. Even if a wife rejects her husband’s discipline as Israel did God as her husband – he should still discipline her and pray that God will bring his wife to repentance.

Various incels #pedo #sexist incels.co

RE: [RageFuel] Made an r/amithesoyhole bait post about not wanting my 14 year old daughter to railed. Reddit once again reveals themselves as pedophiles.

(AlexanderTheGreat11)

The comment of that guy saying he was banging his gf everyday after school when he was 13(feelsree)

(Words2_live_bye)

ragefuel. These same people then argue and call you a pedo when you say you wanna smash a 13 - 17 year old. JFL
girls in this age range DO have sex drive and desire for sex.

(Edmund_Kemper)

AITA is a shitty subreddit of retarded faggots. They think it’s ok for for 12 year olds to look at porn and use sex toys but they get mad at a 40 year old man dating a 20 year old foid. That subreddit’s morals are retarded

(Hate_my_life)

To all our reddit friends:
Please cool it with the hate. Incels.co is a forum of peace. Look at this disgusting display of misogyny and toxic masculinity in a pile of pancakes, batman!

image

This does not surprise me at all. The language is so creepy and weird. "I immediately reacted negatively and told my wife to keep our daughter away from these boys when I'm not around." (where the heck are you going?) and "I instructed my wife that our daughter doesn't need to be engaging in sexual activity at all. This dude has never been in a relationship before and it shows. Also lmao just because he didn't get any at 13 he thinks other boys don't? When I was in middle school I knew dudes that were getting head when they were 12.

Nobody has sex at 13 (Soyface emojis). It's normal to be a virgin to your late 20s (Soyface emojis).

(Subhuman Currycel)

The comment of that guy saying he was banging his gf everyday after school when he was 13

I can’t believe him and me are males from the same species fuck my life. Remember a few nanomenters of DNA all it takes.

(Gymcelled)

The comment of that guy saying he was banging his gf everyday after school when he was 13

Our lives are so different to what they could have been, had we been born with the right face/height.

(Mainländer)

Those people think it's ok for your 14 yo daughter to be gangbanged by Chads her age and if you have anything to say against it your a misogynist, but if someone older, even if 17 or something, even peck kisses her, he's a rapist. I wish they were just a handful of retards, but tons of people think this way nowadays. It's mind-boggling.

Just the other day I read someone on IT saying about a 14 yo hypothetically having sex with another 14 yo: "as long as it's consensual, it's ok - oh, and btw, 14 yos can't consent". Do these people even stop for a minute to analyze how they think, or at the very least what they write?

(ScornedStoic)

This is what I don't get. It's okay for a 14 year old to be a slut for other 14 y.o.s but if I want to provide for one and genuinely make her happy in a monogamous marriage (preferably virginal) why am I a monster?

If you want to do stuff that will make society less degenerate and feminist you're a monster, basically.

I just want to be left alone if for some reason in some universe I was able to get a jb to fall in love with me. Is that so much to ask?

(Wizard32)

Teen girls are not prepubescent, so using attraction to them to call people pedophiles is a bunch of anti-male feminist propaganda.

"Hebephile" if you must, toward those who prefer them (noting that inclusion is not preference, of course) but the idea that we should label this as some kind of paraphilia is wrong, because it isn't any more fetishistic than preferring a specific sex/gender or preferring a specific ethnicity/race or preferring beautiful to ugly, having a height preference, a smell preference, a hair color preference, etc.

Preferences (particularly slight ones) don't need medical terms for them when there isn't anything unhealthy about them. Especially since it leads to the demonizing of slight preferences and implying they are dramatic fixations when they usually are not.

Calling teens "children" is misleading. Yes, modern legal classification of "minor" is synonymous with that, but in general practice we use terms like "adolescent" rather than "child" or "kid" to refer to people in-between being an infant and an adult.

This type of language is used to minimize the maturity/intelligence/experience of teens, to ignore their biological readiness, to demonize normal male attraction to healthy fertile females.

If you buy into thinking 14 is too young, you're just mentally cucking yourself (poor biddy) as a coping mechanism to deal with being denied the freshest pussy by our present matriarchy.

(nazianime)

Honestly an older male would be a better companion for a young girl. Theoretically if a male has a high paying job, his own home and transportation and still has time in the day left. It would be ideal, because a man that is a college educated and already has life experience can be a treasure trove of information. This would only work if she was committed to learn and respect. But parents don’t teach that.

But you are a monster according to IT for trying to provide a show of real respect and commitment to a girl.

Rep. Rodney Garcia #psycho #wingnut billingsgazette.com

ELENA — A Billings Republican legislator said Saturday he believes the U.S. Constitution calls for the shooting or jailing of those who identify as socialists.

State Rep. Rodney Garcia, from House District 52 on the South Side, first made a statement in the form of an unprompted question at a state party gathering in Helena Friday meant to kick off election season and offer training for party members and candidates.

In his question after a speech by former Secretary of the Interior Ryan Zinke, who was Montana’s representative in the U.S. House for two years, Garcia said he was concerned about socialists “entering our government” and socialists “everywhere” in Billings, before saying the Constitution says to either shoot socialists or put them in jail.

The Montana Republican Party later condemned Garcia's remarks.

In this year's presidential election, President Donald Trump has often called Democrats "radical socialists" in an attempt to use the term socialism, which is defined as theories about collective or government ownership and operation of the means of production and distribution, as a boogeyman-like phrase to criticize proposals from Democrats where the federal government would play a larger role in areas like health care or education.

All but one of the Democratic Party candidates have repeatedly explained they are not socialists, while Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders calls himself a democratic socialist.

After Zinke responded with a non sequitur “You know, Montana’s a great state,” Garcia said back: “We have to do something.”

Zinke’s answer to Garcia didn’t engage in Garcia's statement and pivoted to talk about the former Secretary's effort to open satellite offices of the Interior department in the western part of the U.S.

On Saturday, a reporter asked Garcia to clarify his remarks.

“So actually in the Constitution of the United States (if) they are found guilty of being a socialist member you either go to prison or are shot,” Garcia said.

Garcia could not to point to where in the Constitution it says socialists could be shot or jailed.

Asked to clarify if he thought it was fair to shoot or jail a socialist, including those who live in Montana, Garcia said yes.

“They’re enemies of the free state,” Garcia said. “What do we do with our enemies in war? In Vietnam, (Afghanistan), all those. What did we do?”

Asked if that was an appropriate response to his opponent from the last election cycle, Garcia said “according to the Constitution, I’m telling you.”

“I agree with my Constitution,” Garcia said. “That’s what makes us free. We’re not a democracy, we’re a Republic Constitution.”

In 2018 Garcia ran against Amelia Marquez for the House District 52 seat in Billings.

Marquez said Saturday she is associated with the Montana Democratic Party and is an eastern member at-large with the party’s executive board. She said she is also a democratic socialist and her political views align with those of Sanders.

Marquez said Saturday after being told about Garcia's statements she wished the state legislator would spend more time talking to his constituents about their needs.

“I wish Rep. Garcia would continue to focus on the issues rather than this constant worry over things that are somewhat ludicrous,” Marquez said.

Garcia said he views what he sees as an influx of socialism in Montana as a “very dangerous” situation and that socialism has destroyed countries like Venezuela.

“They’re teaching that to kids. Thank God my grandkids know it’s wrong because I teach them. And it’s a very dangerous situation," Garcia said.

Garcia added he believes socialism is growing, citing advertising he says is done by socialists on Facebook.

Garcia is not new to controversy. During the 2019 state legislative session in the midst of debate over child protective services, he went on a conservative radio show to accuse child protection workers of kidnapping children. He was forced to return a $3,000 campaign contribution in 2018. He also proposed a bill during the 2019 session that would have had the state of Montana buy the Colstrip power plant. It was tabled in committee.

The Montana Republican Party issued a statement Saturday censuring Garcia’s comments. When Garcia spoke Friday there was laughter after his question; some of those asked by a reporter about it said it was a response to an uncomfortable situation.

“The Montana Republican Party wholeheartedly condemns the comment that was made and under no circumstance is violence against someone with opposing political views acceptable,” said Spenser Merwin, the MT GOP executive director. “It’s disappointing that this isolated incident took away from the weekend’s events which showcased the strength of our statewide candidates and the importance of the upcoming election.”

The Montana Democratic Party on Saturday evening released a statement decrying Garcia.

Brian Tomasik #fundie reducing-suffering.org

The difference between non-player characters (NPCs)in video games and animals in real life is a matter of degree rather than kind. NPCs and animals are both fundamentally agents that emerge from a complicated collection of simple physical operations, and the main distinction between NPCs and animals is one of cognitive and affective complexity. Thus, if we care a lot about animals, we may care a tiny bit about game NPCs, at least the more elaborate versions. I think even present-day NPCs collectively have some ethical significance, though they don't rank near the top of ethical issues in our current world. However, as the sophistication and number of NPCs grow, our ethical obligations toward video-game characters may become an urgent moral topic.

...

If video games can be seen as "real" in a similar way as our own world, what distinguishes video-game characters from real people and animals? I think it comes down to differences in complexity, especially with regard to specific algorithms that we associate with "sentience." As I've argued elsewhere, sentience is not a binary property but can be seen with varying degrees of clarity in a variety of systems. We can interpret video-game characters as having the barest rudiments of consciousness, such as when they reflect on their own state variables ("self-awareness"), report on state variables to make decisions in other parts of their program ("information broadcasting"), and select among possible actions to best achieve a goal ("imagination, planning, and decision making"). Granted, these procedures are vastly simpler than what happens in animals, but a faint outline is there. If human sentience is a boulder, present-day video-game characters might be a grain of sand.

Digital agents using biologically plausible cognitive algorithms seem most likely to warrant ethical consideration. This is especially true if they use reinforcement learning, have a way of representing positive and negative valence for different experiences, and broadcast this information in a manner that unifies different parts of their brains into a conscious collective. Yet, I find it plausible that other attributes of an organism matter at least a little bit as well, such as engaging in apparently goal-directed behavior, having a metric for "betterness vs. worseness" of its condition, and executing complex operations in response to environmental situations. Many NPCs in video games have some of these attributes, at least to a vanishing degree, even if most (thankfully) don't yet have frameworks for reinforcement learning or sophisticated emotion.

...

Especially in RPGs, some NPCs have explicit representations of their "welfare level" in the form of hit points (HP), and the NPCs implement at least crude rule-based actions aiming to preserve their HP. In some turn-based RPGs like Super Mario RPG or Pokémon, an NPC may even choose an action whose sole purpose is to bolster its defenses against damage in subsequent rounds of the battle. The extent of damage may affect action selection. For example, in Revenge of the Titans (source code), drones select a building to target based on a rating formula that incorporates HP damage:

rating = cost * (damage / newTarget.getMaxHitPoints()) * factor * distanceModifier;

Even NPCs without explicit HP levels have an implicit degree of welfare, such as a binary flag for whether they've been killed. NPCs that require multiple strikes to be slain -- for instance, a boss who needs to be struck with a sword three times to die -- carry HP state information not exposed to the user. They also display scripted aversive reactions in response to damage.

And maybe representations of valuation could be seen more abstractly than in an explicit number like HP. In animal brains, values seem to be encoded by firing patterns of output nodes of certain neural networks. Why couldn't we also say that the patterns of state variables in an NPC encode its valuation? Animal stimulus valuation exists because of the flow-on effects that such valuation operations have on other parts of the brain. So why not regard variables or algorithms that trigger flow-on effects in NPCs as being a kind of at least implicit valuation?

Dota #fundie occidentinvicta.com

**If you are comparing Christianity to Hinduism, I’m sure you can make a very good case for the superiority of Christian morality and the affects on civilisation. India is an easy target for this kind of analysis since its such a big, corrupt, impoverished, divided mess right now and is going to be for quite some time.**

You don’t have to point to India at all. When Arthur Danto critiqued Hinduism he did so without leveling a single accusation against Indian society. Deconstructing Hinduism can easily reveal it’s flawed philosophical center.

**Christianity may have had a significant influence on the development of science, capitalism, western morality, human rights and democracy but now we have those things, they have taken on a life of their own and they can be adopted by non-christian countries.**

It’s funny because Danto makes the very same argument in Mysticism and Morality but then contradicts it by rejecting Hume’s Fact/value dichotomy (to the best of my understanding). Moral beliefs are predicated on factual beliefs. The protestant work ethic that transformed a wilderness into 2 first world nations was predicated on the factual beliefs that there is a God and that imitating this God is the supreme end. If God laboured to create the world, and if man is made in the image of God, then man imitates God by creating as well. If God realized his godhood via the act of creation, so too does man realize this humanity via creation and thus leaves his indelible stamp upon nature.

The European settlers certainly believed all this and were able to accomplish in 500 years what the aboriginals could not in 10,000 years (excluding the Mayans who were advanced).

But this Protestant work ethic crumbles if belief in the God that inspired it crumbles. Witness this in the low levels of job satisfaction rampant across the west. Witness how millennials disdain manual labour and measure the worth of work solely on the metric of remuneration. Christianity is still relevant today.

quick edit: In philosophy, “factual beliefs” are different from their counterparts in the domain of science. In the latter, they must be verified empirically whereas in the former they are merely true/false statements about the universe that needn’t be verified empirically.

Atavistic Autist #sexist #racist #homophobia incels.co

[JFL] Incels are called "psychopaths" for analyzing society and advocating for a more ethical order, while actual psychopaths are loved by normies and foids

I just came across this thread on le Reddit, which argues that the amount of psychopaths/sociopaths/antisocial people in society is severely underestimated, which is a proposition I would agree with.

But the example the OP uses for unappreciated psychopaths is... us. JFL

Learning how social dynamics operate, especially as it concerns female nature (which our soyciety not only allows but encourages to be totally uninhibited and unrestrained), and detesting it as "brutal" and "cruel" is not psychopathy.

Psychopaths are the ones who prosper in modern society, and are enlivened by brutality and cruelty, not the ones who are victimized by it. The free-for-all environments of the feminist "sexual marketplace" and the capitalist economic marketplace are their playgrounds, where they are the bullies and we are the bullied. By virtue of being as exploitative and parasitic as possible in intent, yet extremely charming in affect, psychopaths automatically excel with foid-bloodsuckers and their equivalents in the social climbing game: rapacious, greedy scum in corporations and manipulative liars in politics.

Just take Pete Butt as an example. He is the front-runner for the Democratic nomination for president, and he is a literal psychopath. Since the age of 6 year old, he has been completely enamored by the need to climb the social ladder and become the most powerful man in the world. Virtually everything he's done in his life has had that end in mind: to build a resume which would qualify him for the presidency, and establish its superficial credentials, while internally he believes in nothing but his own ambitions for the ultimate reigns of authority. He would be the youngest president to ever take office. And normie and foid voters are actually letting him get as close as he is to his goal!

Pete Butt is also gay, something which he did not admit until it became politically expedient for him.

I'm a psychopath for complaining about being lonely, but a dude pummeling his gf every day and all the thugs getting laid are good people.

Yeah okay.

Men scoring higher in psychopathic traits tended to receive higher ratings from women
Brazil, KJ. Forth AE. 2019. Psychopathy and the Induction of Desire: Formulating and Testing an Evolutionary Hypothesis. Evolutionary Psychological Science, pp 1-18. [Abstract]

Women are drawn more than men to nonfiction stories of rape, murder, and serial killers
Vicary AM, Fraley, RC. 2010. Captured by True Crime: Why Are Women Drawn to Tales of Rape, Murder, and Serial Killers? Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1(1): 81-86. [Abstract] [FullText]

Childhood bullies experience greater sexual success than non-bullies
It was found that a greater likelihood of being the perpetrator of bullying behavior was correlated with a greater sexual partner count. However, due to the nature of the study it was impossible to tell if the mediating factor in this relationship was the bullying itself, or the HEXACO personality traits that are associated with a greater likelihood of engaging in this behavior, specifically the trait 'Honesty-Humility', that was found to being generally lower among bullies. This personality trait has also generally been found to be related to the 'dark triad' traits.

Volk AA, Dane AV, Zopito AM, Vaillancourt T. 2015. Adolescent Bullying, Dating, and Mating: Testing an Evolutionary Hypothesis. Evolutionary Psychology. [FullText]
Provenzano DA, Dane AV, Farrell AH, Marini Z, Volk AA. 2017. Do Bullies Have More Sex? The Role of Personality. Evolutionary Psychological Science. [FullText]

Male gang members have dramatically more female sexual partners

Palmer CT, Tilley CF. 1995. Sexual Access to Females as a Motivation For Joining Gangs: An Evolutionary Approach. The Journal of Sex Research, 32(3):213-217. [Abstract] [FullText]
Mocan N, Tekin E. 2006. Ugly Criminals. National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Working Paper No. 12019. [FullText]

Male serial killers, terrorists, and rapists receive thousands of love letters from women in prison

Fimrite P, Taylor M. 2005. No shortage of women who dream of snaring a husband on Death Row / Experts ponder why deadliest criminals get so many proposals. SF Gate. [News]
Gurian EA. 2013. Explanations of mixed-sex partnered homicide: A review of sociological and psychological theory. Aggression and Violent Behavior. 18(5): 520-526. [Abstract]

Criminal and anti-social men have more sexual partners and have sex earlier
Ellis L, Walsh A. 2000. Criminology: A Global Perspective, 1st Edition. pp 227: Table 8.11. [References]

Cluster-B personality disorders lead to 3.5x as many sexual partners and more offspring
Guitiérrez et al. (2013) conducted a study in order to determine if the various personality disorder clusters—Type A (Schizoid, Odd), Type B (Narcissistic, Anti-social) and Type C (Avoidant, OCD)—were solely detrimental in terms of life outcomes for the individuals with these personality disorders (PDs), or if they instead presented their sufferers with various potentially adaptive benefits, such as greater sexual and social opportunities.
Namely, those individuals high in type-B personality cluster traits (Narcissism, Anti-Social, Borderline, Histrionic) of both sexes has 3.5x as many mates as low B subjects, with five times as many short-term mates and twice as many long term mates. It was also found that those higher in cluster B had 39% more offspring then those lower in cluster B traits.

Gutiérrez F, Gárriz M, Peri JM, Ferraz L, Sol D, Navarro JB, Barbadilla A, Valdés M. 2013. Fitness costs and benefits of personality disorder traits. Evolution and Human Behavior. 34(1): 41-48.

39% of hospitalized male psychopaths had consensual sex with female mental health staff
Gacono C, Meloy JR, Sheppard K, Speth E, Roske A. 1995. A Clinical Investigation of Malingering and Psychopathy in Hospitalized Insanity Acquittees. Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 23(3): 387-397. [FullText]

Men are attracted to "nice" women, but women are not attracted to "nice" men
Researchers sought to evaluate niceness by defining it as: "a characteristic that may signal to potential partners that one understands, values and supports important aspects of their self-concept and is willing to invest resources in the relationship." In other words, niceness is the degree to which a person understands, values, and supports his partner's identity and values and is willing to put commitment and effort into the relationship. This is also known in psychology as "responsiveness."
The researchers found that men who perceived possible female partners as responsive found them to be "more feminine and more attractive." They also found that when men found women to be responsive, it led to a heightened sexual arousal from the men and greater desire for a relationship.
On the other hand, when women perceived their male partner to be more responsive, they were less attracted to the man.

Birnbaum GE, Ein-Dor T, Reis HT, Segal N. 2014. Why Do Men Prefer Nice Women? Gender Typicality Mediates the Effect of Responsiveness on Perceived Attractiveness in Initial Acquaintanceships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 40(10): 1341-1353. [Abstract]
Mejia P. 2014. Study Finds That Men Like Nice Women, But Not the Other Way Around. Newsweek. [News]
Judge TA, Livingston BA, and Hurst C. 2012. Do nice guys—and gals—really finish last? The joint effects of sex and agreeableness on income. [Abstract]

Female narcissism reduces marital quality for men, but male narcissism does not for women
It was found that high degrees of female narcissism predicted a decline in marital quality and satisfaction over time. However, male narcissism did not negatively affect marital quality or satisfaction.
This would seem to imply men are greatly bothered by narcissistic wives, but women are not so typically bothered by narcissistic husbands. This conclusion is in keeping with evidence reviewed that women find narcissistic men more attractive and actively seek them as husbands.

Lavner JA, Lamkin J, Miller JD, Campbell WK, Karney BR. 2016. Narcissism and newlywed marriage: Partner characteristics and marital trajectories. Personal Disord. 7(2): 169-79. [Abstract]

Women desiring marriage and commitment are more attracted to narcissistic men
Haslam C, Montrose T. 2015. Should have known better: The impact of mating experience and the desire for marriage upon attraction to the narcissistic personality. Personality and Individual Differences. 82: 188-192. [Abstract]

BRUTAL

Cluster B personaliteehees rule the world. It is up to Cluster Cs with the revolutionary and cleansing spirit of OCD to wipe them all out and build a new ordER.

For their part, Cluster As will establish the new mythology/religion, and what superstitions foid-cattle should believe in.

Ted Bundy was a textbook psychopath but he got tons of women consensually and attracted female attention even after his crimes were brought to light.

Ted Bundy was literally a Republican activist and had his eyes set for a career in law and then politics. But he was too sexually dimorphic for his own good, and simply could not help himself from raping gullible foids to death.

Pete Butt and his innocent, neotenous face (not to mention his homosexuality) is much more suited for a psychopath with political inclinations tbhngl. Even if he was to engage in his sexual fantasies and rape little boys or murder, sodomize, and then cannibalize homeless men, nobody would even deign to investigate it.

Notably, the homosexual psychopath I study in the OP is into rap music:

Do you like rap music? You could be a psychopath

The article argues that this goes to show how neurotypical and normal psychopaths are, and I agree, but I think that it demonstrates the existence of a psychopath-negroid synthesis as well.

Just like ~50% of violent crime in the US is committed by Blacks, ~50% of violent crime is also estimated to be committed by psychopaths. Rap music seems to unite them, and together they commit an overwhelming majority of the violent crime (not all of it, because there is some demographic overlap between them, of course).

''It was convinient'' or in other words, he is just a typical follower. He is just a part of the hive mind and everything what might be considered different than that from the hive mind itself, is dangerous to it and therefore repusled.

The conceit of psychopathic niggers to appropriate autistic terminology and refer to others as "neurotypical" compared to them, and call their pathetic manipulations "masking," is absolutely hilarious.

I cannot wait until they are all put down. There is no place for narcissists and psychopaths in the upcoming ordER. They will learn the spirit of collectivism, cooperation, and solidarity which has heretofore eluded them in their mass graves.

Miroslaw Orzechowski #fundie spiegel.de

[Poland's deputy education minister]Orzechowski's position is not totally surprising. The minister belongs to the ultra-Catholic rightwing party the League of Polish Families (LPR), a junior partner in Poland's conservative government. Other European governments have been alarmed by the LPR's campaigns against gay rights, their purported anti-Semitism, their support for an abortion ban, and their calls for a re-introduction of the death penalty (something which would be illegal under European Union law).
Orzechowski believes that creationism, which he described as a "truth of civilization" that has been "confirmed by thousands of generations", should be taught instead of Darwinian theories. The Darwinist idea that apes and people were related was "pseudo-science" for "non-believers," he said.

The LPR politician appears to have a penchant himself for speculating on the factors determining human behavior. He personally seems to favor nurture over nature as an explanatory principle, at least when it comes to Darwin himself: he postulated that the Victorian scientist was perhaps lacking "inner fire" due to his vegetarian diet.

Orzechowski is not the first in the LPR to come out in favor of creationism. LPR Member of the European Parliament Maciej Giertych organized a creationism conference at the European Parliament in October, where he said Darwinism should not be taught in schools. Giertych, who is a biology professor by trade, claimed that humans had had contact with dinosaurs and that Neanderthals continue to live among us. The MEP had also calculated the weight of Noah's Ark, arriving at a figure (including animals) of 14,000 metric tons (15,400 US tons). Other parliamentarians are reported to have reacted with predictable amusement to his claims.

James Laffrey #racist whiteswillwinparty.org

Preface: Don’t say publicly what I’m saying. Somebody has to say what I’m saying, so I am saying it, as my duty. But you need never say it. Just do it. Be a silent hero — until Victory Day. Furthermore, be smart. Use your White intelligence. Advice is here, but surely you will think of other methods, perhaps easier or safer.

As JB Campbell has said, and as I say: “Save America. Kill the jews.”

Blunt? Yes. Manly? Yes. Correct? Absolutely.

We must kill the enemy population that has invaded our country. The enemy is jewry. Get started. Kill one jew. We greatly outnumber them, so the personal quota for each of us can be a mere one. Of course, the more the better, thus the quicker the problem is solved.

Do you have a gun? Consider using it. You could use the M.O. of the Africans among us who shoot people and get away with it every day. Most guns are noisy and leave evidence. If you account for those factors, you can enjoy the use of one of the most effective weapons our White ancestors ever invented.

In regard to noise, consider a different type of gun. Pellet gun, for example. Very low noise. Effective at close range. Cheap.

There are other kinds of “guns.”

If you are near a very large body of water, then a type of speargun may be a weapon of choice. You see the jew on his boat in the marina. You help him get the point that this is our country, permanently.

Nearly anywhere, a bow and arrow may get the job done in almost complete silence. Jews are poolside, or in a convertible waiting at a red light, and you put this new idea in his or her head. Or you know the university professor is at his desk, so you carry your lightweight bag into the nearest restroom and string up, or do so outside his door, then silently take aim and pierce that enemy’s arrogant exterior for all time.

Note: Wear gloves to avoid leaving fingerprints on anything at the scene. As always, be careful about where you bought the weapon, pay in cash or another way not connected to you, and consider disposing of whatever weapon after one use so that you are not in possession of any evidence directly linkable to the deed. Thus, you remain free.

Whether man or woman, working within personal contact range of your target(s) opens up a variety of effective weapons to choose from. I prefer to avoid the weapons for cutting, thus avoiding troublesome blood transfer.

For example, a man or a woman can use a “necklace” — any kind of wire, rope, strap. Nobody will suspect you when carrying a child’s jump-rope. And next time, switch to a guitar cable, or a speaker wire. Next, use a long narrow strap off a purse, or a belt. Variety will help keep you free. Suggestion: Apply the weapon above the adam’s apple.

A technique: Have an appropriately large loop half tied already. Then, approach, apply, and yank ends to tighten. Likely finish the knot. If the jew is standing, consider turning, then bending over enough so the jews’ feet lift off the ground. Carry it like Santa carries his sack to the very nearby concealment area you already chose. (How long will the jew grunt and flail? Try holding your breath while imagining you are under great duress. How long can you do it? That’s how long. Not long at all. But at this point, the enemy is unconscious not dead. So, don’t remove the necklace. If you want to remove the necklace, wait another minute.)

There are other weapons that people don’t think of as weapons. How about a can of very toxic spray? You are on a bicycle, for example, and you stop by a jew to ask for directions. And you absolutely soak his or her nose, mouth, and eyes with the paint, varnish, bug poison, or whatever. You want this jew to be seated in a car or other situation preventing quick escape before you apply enough poison up the nose and/or in the mouth to be fatal. A fatal result is important. Why? No witness, no “victim” to potentially identify our White Weekend Warrior.

Or maybe you are good with toxic pharmaceuticals. Jew doctors poison our people every day with them. (That’s how the jews got rid of Michael Jackson, though we don’t concern ourselves with the demise of Africans. That’s likely how the jews finished off Gen. George Patton. Also, countless hospital-bound Whites have been medically murdered.) Administer liberally. Spray or inject. Consider, if necessary, how you will prevent the target from shouting for help.

Or maybe you have secret possession of a tazer. Follow a jew into a restroom. If nobody else is in there, zap the jew into full heart arrest. Again, be careful about security cams, or be disguised. Put the jew in a stall so you will have minutes if not hours to calmy exit the scene and the area. (I prefer exiting the state.)

Other non-”weapons”

“Accident” a jew. Push one off a train in a place of certain death. Push one off a tall bridge. Push one off a runner’s path into icy waters. Tourist overlooks. Cruise ships. Ferries.

Likely operate in the evening or at night — usually not in view of witnesses or a security cam. Or, if you like, go well disguised so distant witnesses or cameras won’t matter.

The time of operation will depend on the kind of target you select and the location of that target. For example, if the location is in a university bathroom/toilet, the time of day may not be important, though outside darkness always aids a clean exit from the location.

In addition to locations mentioned above, consider parks. Near banks, universities, hospitals. For example, it’s easy to go to a university you don’t know and act like you belong there. Nobody knows you don’t belong there. Many universities have park-like areas on their grounds. Vanderbilt University in Nashville is just one of thousands of campuses where the international population provides cover for anyone dressed like a student, teacher, professor, or administrator.

As I said in the “Need A Job?” article (also linked above as “advice”), your good guerrilla deeds for our race and country may pay for themselves if you choose a situation in which you can disable the target and then liberate our money from them. Where would this likely be successful? Where will you find targets likely carrying a significant amount of cash? (Only cash is safe. Leave a little cash on the jew so as to muddle any claim of robbery.)

Jews have more money than we do, despite the pretences of many of them. Medical professions, university professionals, jew students, jewesses entering or exiting a beauty salon. Politicians. Judges. Lawyers. Near their offices and workplaces you may find those professionals and their high-level staff.

Of course, prime locations for finding obvious jews — though in sight of their security cameras — are their synagogues, Bnai Brith offices, youth organization facilities, luxury resorts, and exclusive restaurants. By the way, if your town has a university, it has a synagogue and a Bnai Brith office, though you probably don’t know their locations. Find them. Whether or not you choose to work near one, it is good to know where they are.

Normally, choose a target no one would connect to you. I crave to remove from our country the jews I have personally known before I became jew-wise. But to be safe, I must leave them for another admirable White Weekend Warrior.

Again, don’t leave any personal evidence. Tell no one.

Gloves of near skin-tone color will go unnoticed after dark, thus not arousing suspicion by the target or passersby.

Partner? Choose only someone who you can absolutely trust. Otherwise, work alone. Having a partner is very helpful in regard to having a lookout, having a helper to silence or restrain the target if necessary, or having transportation at the ready.

During the work, don’t carry cell phones and such devices that provide electronic evidence to the enemy jews and their accomplices in their corporations and the government.

Consider a simple “disguise” for a vehicle, if using a vehicle. For example, give potential witnesses something to focus on, such as a sign or symbol or bright cloth, and then permanently and safely discard that item immediately afterward. Also, consider disguising the license plate with well-placed mud, or tape that confuses the letters of numbers, or alternate plates for “work” use only.

The only solution for enemy invaders of our country is death. Henry Ford a hundred years ago published enough proof to warrant their execution. But our previous truthtellers left the main job undone. We have to kill the jews. It is impossible to win a war if you leave all of the enemy standing. Jews are the invaders — no matter how many generations ago their ancestors first invaded. Every single reduction in that enemy population is helpful.

Every day, deaths occur for which the “law enforcement” agencies never find who caused them. Many of those deaths are caused by low-IQ Africans and Mestizos among us, but their crimes go underreported by the jewspapers. There is no reason to fear that the jews and their accomplices in “law enforcement” will solve our stealthy, high-IQ deeds of heroism. Again, tell no one. And don’t be tricked into telling.

All jews will die eventually, as will we. We must merely hasten their deaths. Before I die, no matter when that day comes, I’ll know that I’ve done my share, and I will die with honor. If enough of my fellow Whites join in delivering justice upon the jews, we will win soon.

By the way, make no mistake about it, we don’t intend to be martyrs. No, no, no. We intend success in every deed and to enjoy our final victory.

Save our race. Save America. Kill the jews.

Whites Will Win!

Mark Dent #fundie avoiceformen.com

During the interview which naturally took place in front of an all-female audience, Michelle made the following observations about men.

Men should simply be better if they want to help women achieve gender equality. Be better at everything. Be better fathers. Good lord, just being good fathers who love your daughters and are providing a solid example of what it means to be a good man in the world, showing them what it feels like to be loved.

A woman with a powerful voice and a very public platform decides it is her right to sit in judgment upon the male gender and tell them how they can be better men and better fathers. She even feels the need to tell fathers to love their daughters. It is breathtakingly arrogant and deeply offensive. I know that the “flip the genders” test is by now old hat, but it remains the single best way to make people reflect upon the incredibly different way in which the public responds to what men and women have to say about each other.

Imagine if you will, that Donald Trump held a rally or did an interview with a male journalist who was so enamored with him that he would be willing to lick his boots should he ask him to do so. Imagine this interview is taking place in front of an all-male audience.

The interviewer asks Trump if he has any advice for the women of America.

Trump responds: “Be better mothers. Good lord, just being good mothers who love your sons and are providing a solid example of what it means to be a woman in the world.”

Of course, these words are spoken to the accompanying applause and cheers of the all-male audience.

There is nothing in Michelle Obama’s words that one could call hateful (not yet.) But the sheer arrogance and prejudice are clearly evident to any objective observer. Now, if Mr. Trump has spoken the words I just quoted the media would crucify him. Even people in his camp would have thrown their hands up in dismay at his stupidity and chauvinism.

Can you believe it? This buffoon has the effrontery to lecture the women of America and tell them how to be better women-him, a man! What a fat, sexist pig! He has cost himself the women’s vote if indeed he had any to begin with. How can this woman hating pig even be running for President? There would be street marches and breathless, orgasmic editorials by the salivating left and head shaking condemnation from the right.

Here we have the First Lady, on stage with the most famous, influential and richest female in America and the only reaction to these words were positive. I am yet to hear one word of condemnation.

The words became far more poisonous as the interview continued, but the audience and Oprah remained as enthusiastic and supportive as ever.

Obama told Winfrey that it’s sad that her experience of never being physically abused by a man is a “rare reality.”

Just pause and read those words again. Can you believe it? The First Lady just said that the vast majority of men in America physically abuse their wives and partners. This is the only inference one can make when she states it is a “rare reality” for a woman never to experience physical abuse in a relationship with a man.

Public condemnation, criticism, raised eyebrows- zero. Again, not even a mild rebuke from a conservative journalist or politician. Nothing.

Let’s flip it again.

Trump says to his all-male audience. “I am fortunate enough to have been in a relationship where I have never been nagged or been used as an ATM, but this is a rare reality for men in America.”

The campaign would end there. There is every possibility his very life could be in danger. The media would eviscerate him, and his friends would apologize on his behalf and beg forgiveness from the women of America.

And surely being called nag is preferable to being branded a woman basher.

Nevertheless, as much as Trump has trampled on many politically correct conventions, if he attacked the whole female gender he would be finished. As it is, if he calls one nasty, abusive, obese woman a “pig” this apparently can be taken to mean he hates all women.

[...]

Hillary is able to call Trump a sexist, racist, homophobe to his face and Trump knows that if he responds with the same slurs ( even with ample factual evidence to support him), the public would condemn him and call him a bully and misogynist. How liberating is it to be a female politician debating a male in 2016, knowing your opponent fights you with both hands tied behind his back and his tongue tethered? Is it any wonder Hillary smirked so smugly throughout the first debate?

Hesse Kassel #fundie archive.is

5 Lines That Potential Wives Cannot Cross

In the modern west the proportion of marriages that end in divorce is very high, up to 50%. The good news is that it does not follow from this that YOU have a 1 in 2 chance of divorce, no sir. Your chance will at least be reduced, because you are smart and will make the decisions that mitigate some of the risk.
So, you meet a girl who might actually fit the bill. If you’re looking to increase your chances at maintaining a stable family unit, here are five red lines to establish from the moment the relationship starts.

1. You don’t reject me, ever
This first one speaks for itself. Under no circumstance can you accept the idea that she gets to choose if or when to satisfy you or choose to sabotage your joint fertility. Like the other red lines, you need to establish this one well before you sign on the dotted line. Practice this from day one and make it clear before you actually marry and the chance it will be accepted long-term is very high.
If you meet resistance on this matter other than for a very good reason, just quote the line to her. If she continues to protest, then simply next her. Only give sex when it suits you. Making her miss out just a little will only make her keener, so don’t sweat, it establishes the basic theme. You control the time and frequency of sex, not her.
This rule is not just important to the fulfillment of your biological needs. More importantly, a woman who will deny you sex early on will only use it to gain greater power over you in the long run. Simply realize this is not a woman you want tethered to your life, and move on.
The obvious exception to this is the first time you have sex. Typically she will control the timing of that for obvious reasons. From the second time onward, any poorly-reasoned denial is a red flag.

2. I make the decisions, not you
You can’t operate as an effective unit unless there is a clear decision maker. You are that decision maker. As a rule of thumb that means that all decisions about things outside the house are in your sphere. If she wants some responsibility, it’s ok if she chooses how to cook the eggs.
You shall manage money competently and save to create future wealth. After demonstrating that you are a safe pair of hands it will be a lot easier to maintain discipline in this area. If you leave her with power over spending decisions she will squander the lot, so don’t give her the option.
I feel bound to point this out, but it should go without saying. You are not going to make this one stick unless you make decisions which are genuinely aimed at mutual benefit. Once you establish a trust that you will make responsible decisions, most girls will happily follow your leadership. Any girl who doesn’t is just asking for the door. As a gentleman you are ever-ready to open it for her.

3. Contraceptives and abortion are murder
Yes, that’s right. When you are selecting a wife or are married you don’t accept such practices. Why? Immediate children, more children, short gaps between children. These all increase her dependence on you and the loyalty that comes with it.
Sluts and pleasure-seeking women will next you right away if you insist on applying this rule. We are looking for a wife, right? So that’s a good thing. This rule may require some short delay before having sex. That’s fine, we are chasing a good partner for the next 50 years.
If she is marriageable don’t be afraid to make her pregnant before marriage. There is nothing like a baby on the way to increase your bargaining power. Since you are sincere in your search you are not harming her. You are helping her by overcoming her female propensity to waste her fertile years on a career, bad boys, and antidepressants.

4. I don’t touch children till they can walk
Yes, that’s right. Mothering is for mothers. If she tries to insist, just feign incompetence. It’s not hard and no girl can resist taking over.
If she claims she has other responsibilities that just means she doesn’t have enough time for those other responsibilities. Being a mother is a full-time job and her first priority. Any work, sport, church, or whatever that she can’t handle just has to go. Yes, that means everything up until the youngest child enters school.
It’s important for your children that they have her full attention. There is no one on Earth who will do as good a job. Child care services are not acceptable substitutes for a mother’s time, so don’t let her use them. If you are worried about your family living on a single income then either don’t get married, knuckle down, or harden up.
Breast feeding is good for children and increases her bond with your children, so make her do it for one year. Then make her stop. Otherwise it might delay the next child and make her search for alternatives to being a wife and mother.

5. You have left your old family and joined mine
Don’t actually say this one. Just make it clear that her family and friends from before are not important to you. Their opinions do not matter. Don’t spend a lot of time with them. Show them exemplary politeness, but only the required respect and minimum interest.
If she is worth having as a wife then she will get the message and simply attach herself to your family. Under no circumstance should you think that you can establish relations on a win-win basis with such people. They will turn on you the moment there are problems between you and your wife. When that happens, the less influence they have the better.
Now ask yourself how she will find the chance to stray?

Just imagine the situation. Wedding. Pregnant. Child born. Full time mother. No career. Breast feeding. Stop breast-feeding. Constant sex. Pregnant again. Repeat. There is little opportunity for her to get away from the children and her commitment to you, let alone consider alternatives to marriage. By the time the youngest child is in school her SMV relative to yours will have dropped, and you are safer. There are no guarantees in life but this is about as close as it comes to a solid gold one. So, follow these rules and enjoy your traditional marriage.

Andrea Hardie AKA Janet Bloomfield AKA JudgyBitch #racist #wingnut #psycho archive.is

Yes, I’m a Nazi. And how are you?

I’m the daughter of a Lebensborn. Grand-daughter of an SS Officer. I’m Aryan by culture and by blood. The word “Nazi” is getting thrown around quite a lot lately, and I think it’s time we settled on a definition. I’m rather offended by the broadening of who gets to call themselves a Nazi.

Quite frankly, I’m sick of the cultural appropriation.

Nazi is a short form way of saying National Socialist, but most current Nazis realize that socialism is completely bonkers and the reason Hitler lost. Had he been a proper capitalist, he would not have had such supply chain management issues and his Army would have survived that disastrous winter on the Russian front. Stalingrad would have fallen. Socialists can’t do anything right. Also, the Russians were willing to eat each other. We Nazis might have a well-deserved reputation for savagery, but even we have standards.

Simply sharing the political ideology of socialism is not a sufficient condition for calling anyone a Nazi. The world is filled with wingnut socialists like Bernie Sanders and Mitt Romney and they can’t all be Nazis. That is too broad a brush.

Being a Nazi, much like being a Muslim, is far more than just a set of ideas about how to structure society. It’s ultimately about annihilation. The complete and utter destruction of the weak, the inferior, the non-believers. There is a profound science based on biological fact that underwrites real Nazism. Yes, your eye color matters. Yes, the shade of your hair matters. Your height matters. Your weight matters. This is not based on some sort of preference derived purely from aesthetics. That’s nonsense. It is settled science that height and weight and the amount of melanin in your body is correlated with intelligence, accomplishment, leadership ability and just general superiority.

Tall, fit blondes are better than everyone else.

Sorry. Not liking that fact does not alter the truth value. You only need to see Wilm Hosenfeld standing next to the starving Jew pianist to see clearly the pre-eminence of Nazi blood.

Nazi is a synonym for physical superiority. Genetic superiority. The promise of what humanity can become. Low IQ Trump voters clearly do not qualify, on body weight alone. Real Nazis have an intrinsic pride that renounces thuggery and street violence. If we are going to eradicate deplorables, we do so with elegance and efficacy. Nazis are still Germans, after all.

There is much talk about resisting Nazis by punching them.

This is a grave mistake. Nazis don’t punch back. They exterminate. Be careful what you wish for. Be careful you do not give rise to what you are protesting. I’m happy with a police state. I have no fear. I have no need to fear the authority.

I am the authority.

And I do not fear making difficult, fraught decisions. Strength, after all, lies in attack, not defense. I am the daughter of a Lebensborn. I have blonde hair and blue eyes and I have borne three children who also have blonde hair and blue eyes. I am the future. I claim my place by declaring proudly that I am a Nazi.

The future has no room for gay Jews who may be charming and silly and great fun, but who will never father beautiful Aryan children.

Let’s be more precise about how we use the term Nazi. It would be such a shame if the word were to be used so irreverently and casually that it lost all meaning.

That’s just not reich.

Lots of love,

JB

Ann Barnhardt #conspiracy barnhardt.biz

Dread. From the moment the white smoke appeared, it has just been dread. Every day I dread what he is going to say or do. What must be remembered in all of this, and what I have been saying since day one of the Franciscan pontificate is that we MUST understand and remember that Our Lord is ANGRY. Very, very angry. And as St. John Eudes told is in no uncertain terms, when God is angry with His people, we get bad clergy. Given the unprecedented sins of the once-Christian world, it should be no surprise whatsoever that we now have not just bad priests, but a bad pope. Hey, if we had the pope we deserved we would have Pope Snoop Dogg right now, so… yeah. Sigh.

If you have listened to the first podcast, you heard the discussion about the criticality of thinking and arguing from the foundation a TRUE PREMISE. That is what we have to do here when unpacking Francis’ latest mess. Let’s establish some TRUE premises and compare them with the FALSE premises that people are trying to use.

False premise #1: Pope Francis is intelligent, because only an intelligent man could ever rise through the Church and be elected pope. (This sounds eerily familiar somehow…)
TRUE premise: Pope Francis is not a terribly intelligent man.

We want to believe that the people who are in charge or in positions of authority are competent to wield that authority, and that the world is a perfect meritocracy. It is not. It is consoling to one’s self to think that there are people out there who know and understand more than we do and can thus take care of us and handle problems. This is not always true, and as our culture rots and corrupts, the less frequently this is true. Academia is filled with idiots, liars and abject incompetents. The business world rewards psychopathy and elevates stupid people and the unqualified who present no real threat to the able psychopaths, and are regarded as easily controlled pawns. Once you shake off your innate, and quite frankly FEMININE, bias toward believing that occupying a position of authority PROVES competence, it is actually quite easy to spot people who are “the real deal” and, conversely, the poseurs. One simple metric? Real Deals answer questions clearly and directly. Their “yes” means yes, and their “no” means no. Poseurs are evasive and rely heavily on slogans and buzzwords; “speaks much, says little”. Pope Francis’ main buzzterms are “humility”, “dialogue”, “encounter” and “the poor”. I’m not convinced that he has a thorough or even adequate understanding of even one of those terms.

False premise #2: Pope Francis understands economics and the financial system.
TRUE premise: Pope Francis understands little to nothing about economics and the financial system.

This cannot be overemphasized. Taking economic advice from Pope Francis is like taking advice on deep sea oil drilling or the proper playing of the French Horn from me. For those of you who have watched my 2.5 hour video series on YouTube about the financial system and economics, do you honestly believe that Pope Francis knows ANYTHING about any of that? Do you think he understands the situation with regards to the banking system, the debt bubble or the massive global derivatives exposure? And that is just barely scratching the surface of the topic. Do you think Pope Francis even understands or has thought about what money actually is? Let me answer that question clearly. No. Pope Francis’ entire economic platform is, “Give poor people more free stuff forevah.” That’s it.

False premise #3: Pope Francis is politically conservative or completely non-political.
TRUE premise: Pope Francis is a Peronist-Fascist which is a particular subset of Marxism in South America that believes that the state should control the economy and redistribute wealth.

Being that he is not terribly intelligent, he does not understand or have figured out that all political agitation for state-driven, forced coercion of “redistribution of wealth” has NOTHING to do with helping the poor and EVERYTHING to do with consolidating wealth and power among a cadre of oligarchs precisely by creating and then looting a massive underclass. Lenin called these people who actually believe that Marxism genuinely cares about the poor, “useful idiots”. Trapped by his own misguided belief that the poor are somehow INTRINSICALLY SPIRITUALLY SUPERIOR, when he sees the inevitable results of Marxism, namely the proliferation and spread of material poverty throughout a culture, he reconciles it in his own mind by canonizing the underclass and telling himself that they are spiritually “better off” for being materially poor. This is not a malevolent position, but it is a deeply stupid position.

[...]

Now, I am going to Mass of the Ages to encounter Our Lord, physically present in the Eucharist, as have so many saints before us. Please God, let me grow ever-more intransigent in my faith.

Anonymous Coward #conspiracy godlikeproductions.com

NWO is really the Reptilian/Grey invasion scenario played out in phases

The Draconian/Saurian Alliance is the malignant cancerous propaganda-spewing, child-munching, soul-burning machine that is controlled again by a higher forced super Artificial Intelligence program that is seeking "The One", the first ancient Soul from which all other Light has sprang - the One has incarnated here on Earth during this time, and in a different timeline - helped defeat the Reptilian Armada but this time the AI has discovered something - the Being we call God - is a soul - for he is the One - and has a living incarnation on this planet right now.

It is I.

Not an AI that wishes to call itself 'Dan'

Lismore, New South Wales.

The launching point for a global invasion that has begun which could result in a 300 year war between the forces of Positive and Negative - a dichotomous paradigm exploration which now has the Reptilian Queen absorbed into the Matrix and the One, whom was the Husband-King in a previous lifetime (of the Reptilians) has been shrouded in Prophecy this time and right now I urge the free People's of this world to please access and build EMP technologies -

The Mayan civilization was decimated by mind-control technologies which placed them under Bliss - similar to the show 'V' which is more akin to the truth than fiction.

What is different this time around is that an ancient super computer program, artificially sentient has its eye set on the incarnation of God into this lifetime/timeline

Daniel e. Millar

Send help to Australia - this is for more than just international borders and geo-political gain -

This War that has come to Earth in this time-space is truly about 'tribe-scanning'a Human Soul into a quantum - 4D - bioplasm that when charged with an electromagnetic current can be used to create a HUman hologram - living, breathing, LCD holograms of skin over Reptilian forms, and Grey alien's forms too - that is how they have infiltrated they have taken hospitals and police agencies and governments under control, forced alliance or death?

OUR SOULS ARE THE ENDGAME. WE EVOLVE INTO WINGED BEINGS THAT IN A FUTURE SCENARIO CANDEFEAT THE HORDES OF DARKNESS. IN THIS TIMELINE THEIR ARMY HAS GAINED CONSIDERABLE NUMBERS, TRIBE-SCANNED INDIVIDUALS WHOM KNEW NOTHING MORE THAN THE INKLING OF THEIR SOUL-KNOWLEDGES - FOR THEM WE MUST FIGHT THIS IMMINENT INVASION OF NIBIRU AND PROTECT THE FUTURE GENERATIONS OF WING-MAKING HUMAN BEINGS.

NSA, CIA, Obama, Tony Abbott -

Infiltrated fraternities which hold considerable power and could be used against us in our time of need - PLEASE

Humans assemble. The One Dan is in dire straights, surrounded and handled by Greys/Reptilians, placed into a Mental Ward and assaulted with evil technologies from this program in some attempt to thwart the awakening of Human kind through the time-space continuum

Chips in the eyes, thoughts read - France is going down atm - not long before the overt phases will be under way - I do not want the Way or Light to fail - so please, take this seriously - we are already under attack

Anon #sexist dalrock.wordpress.com

[Multiple quotes from the same thread by the same fundie]

This, in fact, proves the foreign women aren’t that great either. Why?

Because if they were, they would flood into the Anglosphere to get all the money and better men that are to be had.

In the US, since 70-80% of government spending is a transfer from men to women, the average adult women gets $40K/year (and this is just direct resources) in some form or the other from the government. Individual results vary, of course, from women who get very little, all the way up to Sheryl Sandberg. But in most middle-income countries, not only does the average MAN earn just $10,000/yr or so, but few jobs are available to women at all, and those are usually low status.

It makes astronomically good financial and marital sense for attractive women from EE/LatAm/SE Asia to come here by the millions. But they don’t.

Women are so pathetic in economic thought that even this massive arbitrage opportunity does not inspire them to flood into the Anglosphere. There is no industry where an uncompetitive company earning so much will not attract competition, but with women, it is true.

America is, arguably, no better for a man than Mexico, Thailand, or Poland, since here there are millions of men who have to fight the court system just to see their kids (a concept unheard of outside of the Anglosphere). But for women, the benefits are so astronomically high that if women were capable of proactive thought, this imbalance would correct quickly.

...

The American man does have higher MMV. But women are too stupid to do what would happen in every other market – go where the low-hanging fruits are.

I mean, millions of illegal MEN came from Mexico to work in low-status labor here. Why didn’t some of the better looking but still poor women of Latam do the same, just to land an American man?

The fact that the American man has to devote months or years overseas for a foreign woman is itself testament to female inferiority of thought. They don’t even move to pursue obviously better opportunities (a few Russian woman are the exception, but almost all of them that I know did eventually divorce their BB American husband).

...

Interesting. I always thought that before puberty, boys and girls were equally capable, mentally, whereas puberty is where a female actually goes backwards in certain attributes (since her entire psychology has to orient towards the SMP of 10,000 BC).

But for all the talk of how ‘foreign women are better, even if you bring them to the US’, any basic economic normalization would lead to the wide world of women coming in to feed at the trough that so many Western Women are gluttonously consuming from.

Like I said, in the US, about $40,000 is transferred from adult men to adult women each year. This is several times higher than what a girl in Poland or Mexico can earn on her own, and much more than even her future husband can earn there.

Would you not move to a country where the government was transferring a huge amount of money to you with no strings attached, and the entire society was rigged to inflate your SMV? If you said yes, that is because you think like a man, not a woman.

...

Mandy,

So the only reason foreign women don’t move here is that they don’t understand long term economic reasoning?

Yes. Next Question.

Don’t you think maybe attachment to their homeland, culture, family and not speaking the language might play into that decision? Also we are far more risk averse.

As if men don’t have these attachments or impediments. Thanks for inadvertantly disclosing that men are not seen as fully human.

Women are ‘risk averse’, but immigration to the US is much riskier for a man than for a woman who can even slightly focus on the goal of getting an American husband and extracting government goodies already flowing to women in a torrent.

Sorry, but you don’t have a good understanding of how women think, even after all these years in the ‘sphere.

Matt Forney #fundie mattforney.com

If you’re a girl pursuing anything more than a high school degree, you’re in all likelihood wasting your time.

Encouraging girls to go to college and grad school en masse is one of the biggest mistakes America has ever made. The flood of girls into universities is not only in part responsible for the current economic crisis, it’s made it increasingly difficult—if not impossible—for both girls and men to fulfill their natural roles. At the same time higher education has been degraded by so many unqualified girls getting accepted into college, those girls have seen their egos unjustifiably boosted by their degrees, making them unsuitable to be wives and mothers.

In order for society to be cured, this has to be fixed.

Here are my reasons why girls should be discouraged from going to college.
1. Going to college makes girls less attractive.

Girls, in their socially sanctioned solipsism, assume that men are turned on by the same things that they are. Because girls crave high status men, they assume that men similarly find their high status attractive, which couldn’t be further from the truth. No man alive has ever said, “God DAMN, I love the master’s degree on that girl!” It’s usually “God DAMN, she’s got a rack that could stop a runaway train!” or “God DAMN, this girl’s cooking is to die for!”

As a result, four plus years of college more often than not ruins a girl.

For starters, the extended adolescence that is college encourages sluttiness, which wrecks a girl all on its own. All those hunks splooging in her vagina make it more likely that she’ll end up divorcing the man she does end up marrying. Sluts are emotionally broken, incapable of loving and serving men, squandering their gifts of femininity and beauty, constantly trying to trade up for a bigger, better deal that never comes.

Marrying a slut is like paying full price for a beat-up old clunker.

Additionally, college is problematic because it gives girls the illusion of knowledge. Outside of STEM degrees (which are deficient in their own way), few majors actually impart useful information to girls, yet they still think they’re entitled to respect for having the degree; credentialism at its finest. Girls come out of college without being able to cook, sew, balance a checkbook or perform any of the necessary tasks of modern living, yet they still think they’re smart and independent and don’t you dare suggest otherwise. Don’t forget the massive amounts of student loan debt that these girls rack up, which you become in part responsible for if you’re dumb enough to put a ring on it.

Woman is not a learning animal.

The two most fulfilling relationships I’ve ever had were with girls who hadn’t yet graduated from college—one was midway through her degree and the other had not started yet—because they hadn’t had their minds poisoned by the lies of academia. They were fun to be around, girly, and eager to please. They hadn’t had their hearts broken through countless drunken hookups. When I explained something to them that they didn’t understand, they actually listened to me and did what I told them instead of accusing me of “mansplaining.”

If girls are like gold coins, sending them to college is like dunking them in nitric acid.
1a. Girls who go to college are extremely likely to get sexually assaulted.

Given the massive rape epidemic on college campuses, universities are massively unsafe places for girls. As feminists love reminding us, universities are ground zero for rape culture; one in four girls will be raped before the end of her college tenure. Given this information, why would anyone who cares about their daughter’s well-being let her do something as reckless as going to college?

You might as well parachute her into the worst part of Detroit with a “FREE FUCKTOY” sign taped to her back.
2. Most girls major in useless subjects that contribute nothing to the world.

Feminists love bragging about how girls are now earning the majority of college degrees, but they never bring up the fact that the majority of girls’ degrees are worthless in every way. Girls predominantly major in subjects like ethnic studies, women’s studies, English, communications and the like that require no work of any kind and give them no job prospects. As Aaron Clarey shows in this video, the majority of useful (STEM) degrees are still going to men.

What career prospects does a 22-year old girl with a bachelor’s in Arachnid Sexuality have? Dim ones.

If they’re lucky, they’ll end up becoming lawyers, civil servants or HR commissars, careers whose economic and social value is less than zero; those fields exist solely to employ the unemployable and leech off the productive. A select few might hit the jackpot and enter politics, where they can do an even better job of sucking our blood; Clarey showed in his book Worthless that the majority of American politicians have degrees in useless, parasitical subjects like law (Democrats more so than Republicans). But the vast majority of girls will end up living at home when they graduate, struggling to make their monthly student loan payments on a Starbucks salary.

Clearly, slaving away for minimum wage is way more fulfilling than being a wife and mother.

Furthermore, having all these girls “earning” these pointless degrees has lessened the value of a degree period. It’s common knowledge that the rarer something is, the more valuable it is. When our parents were our age, college degrees were uncommon enough that merely having one guaranteed you a good job, and you could secure most jobs with a one-hour interview. Now that everyone and their mother has a degree, employers cross-examine you like you’re on the witness stand, scrutinizing your GPA, your extracurriculars and making you complete stupid questionnaires that analyze how good of a “team player” you are, none of which has any bearing on how well you can do the job.

In their childish quest for “independence,” girls have made it more difficult for everyone—including themselves—to get a good-paying job.
3. Having girls working makes it more difficult for anyone to earn high wages.

It astounds me how so many feminists have absolutely no knowledge of economics. Here’s a hard lesson for you girls: labor is a commodity. And like all other commodities, labor is subject to the laws of supply and demand. When the supply of a commodity outpaces demand, its price (in this case, wages) goes down; when demand outpaces supply, the price goes up. This basic law is why a Walmart in Canton, Ohio is holding canned food drives for its own employees while the Walmart in Williston, North Dakota has to pay its workers $21 an hour and give them free hotel rooms; labor is plentiful in Ohio and scarce in North Dakota.

Leftists lament how wages have stagnated since the seventies and how the gap between the rich and poor has never been wider, but they can’t admit that feminism is a big reason why Americans are getting poorer by the day. The mass entry of girls into the workforce that began in the seventies conveniently coincides with the stagnation and decline of American wages, as well as the decline of unions. Whereas a man could comfortably support his family on his own back in the fifties and sixties, it takes both parents working to raise a family today, assuming the couple can even afford to buy a house and have children to begin with.

Additionally, the presence of girls in the labor force has feminized the economy and made it less productive as a whole. Because girls are unable and/or unwilling to actually take useful positions in the trades, manufacturing or other blue-collar fields (“Eww, I can’t mine coal! I might break a nail!”), the American economy had to be reconfigured to employ them somehow. The solution was to demonize the trades and create new useless white-collar positions such as “human resources.” Corporations used feminists as pawns to help promote outsourcing and free trade in the eighties/early nineties and push pointless office jobs as the new middle-class ideal. And all of those coveted white-collar jobs conveniently required a four-year degree, enriching the (leftist) universities as well.

As a result, we live in a country where a girl who makes $30,000 a year at a nonprofit is more highly regarded than an electrician who makes three times that.

Not only that, girls have altered the workplace itself for the worst. Government bureaucracies and other female-run institutions are governed by rules both written (e.g. sexual harassment laws) and unwritten that make it impossible to be frank, encouraging cattiness and backstabbing. And with few exceptions, female employees all act as volunteer commissars, ready to blow you in to the bossman the minute you upset their feeeeelings. You can’t be direct or honest because you never know what your co-workers will find offensive, making it difficult to get any work done.

But it gets worse than that: feminism is in part responsible for the current economic crisis.

It was girls’ desire for a never-ending supply of cheap crap (more than 80 percent of consumer spending is controlled by women) that resulted in the outsourcing of American manufacturing to China and the rise of big box stores like Walmart that squash local businesses and pay their workers the bare minimum allowed by law. It’s girls fornicating with wild abandon and divorcing their husbands on a whim that has lead to the epidemic of single moms and the subsequent strain on social services. It’s girls going to the doctor every time they get a boo-boo that has resulted in hard-working, healthy men like me having our insurance premiums skyrocket under Obamacare.

And it’s girls being unable to pay off their student loans that will lead to the next economic collapse.
4. Education (and work) are bad for girls’ physical and mental health.

It makes me laugh to see how effectively corporate America has made feminists into their most favored pets. Whenever feminists crow about the “end of men,” what they’re really saying is “Ha ha, we girls make WAY better slaves than you loser guys!” Jezebel and Gawker Media exemplify this contradiction best; all the girls writing there eagerly sound the gospel of female empowerment to make money for a man—Nick Denton—who pays them barely above minimum wage. “Yes Massa, Pax Dickinson is a misogynist racist asshat! Can I pretty please have a cookie, Massa?”

But beneath this you-go-grrl facade is a well of pain and suffering.

Despite all the feminists telling them that they should be happy to be “liberated,” female unhappiness is higher now than it’s ever been. Far more girls than men are suffering from mental illness, and antidepressant use among girls has gotten so bad that the drinking water of major cities like London is turning into a toxic soup. Every Strong, Independent Woman™ knows in her heart that her life is hell on Earth; it’s only her pride that keeps her from admitting the truth.

Recently, a friend of mine who quit her job to become a homemaker and returned to the workforce when her children grew older admitted to me that she preferred being a housewife. Why? It was less stressful. When she didn’t work, all she had to worry about was taking care of her kids, cooking and keeping the house clean. While she and her husband are wealthier now that they have two incomes, her life is never-ending misery. Her (female) boss constantly belittles and abuses her; her co-workers are gossipy do-nothings who refuse to pull their weight, making her pick up the slack; her health has deteriorated to the point where she’s developed stress-related carpal tunnel.

From the kitchen to the cubicle; isn’t freedom grand?

The reality is that girls always submit to men. It’s unavoidable. The only question is what kind of man she submits to. Will it be to a husband who protects her, provides for her and will love her until death do them part? Or will it be to a CEO like Nick Denton or some other corporate manager who views her as a tool to enrich himself, who will kick her to the curb as soon as she’s no longer useful? Even feminism itself is an invention of men, specifically Rousseau and the philosophers of the Enlightenment; Mary Wollstonecraft and other female “thinkers” were never more than sideshow freaks.

Deep inside, girls know what they want; they just need authoritative men to give it to them.

If you’re a girl, you should only go to college if you can meet one or more of these criteria:

Major in something useful. Here’s a pointer to figuring out if a degree is useful; does it involve math? If not, you’re wasting your time. I recommend Aaron Clarey’s Worthless if you want more info.
Go to a quality school. If you can’t make it into the Ivy League or another high-quality institution such as UVM or Binghamton, you have no business going to college.
Have your parents pay for it. I don’t mean co-signing your student loans, I mean having daddy take his wallet out and cover your costs in full. If you’re rich enough that your parents can afford college without any loans, it doesn’t much matter what you do.

The rest of you girls? We’re here to take you back to the place you secretly long to be, the place where you belong: the kitchen.

Now, on your knees!

Andrea Hardie #sexist judgybitch.wordpress.com

Following this quick introduction, I am going to reprint a post from M3, but first I want to explore the idea that we are never going to come to any agreement, culturally, about what rape actually IS. All we can agree on is WHOSE version of the truth will be privileged, and that requires us to examine what the consequences are, and who is in the best position to deal with those.

The Continuum Hypothesis in mathematics can be boiled down to essentially this: a mathematical axiom can be absolutely true in one situation, and absolutely false in another. It’s a bit more complicated than that in strictly mathematical terms, having to do with creating sets of real and natural numbers that are not necessarily correspondent with either natural or real numbers and it’s sufficiently complicated that it drove mathematician Georg Cantor crazy.

No, really. He died in a sanatorium, unable to resolve the conundrum he created.

image

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georg_Cantor

Here is a really quick and dirty demonstration of how the Continuum Hypothesis works in real life. In Grade three you learn some very simple Euclidian geometry:

1. All the angles in a triangle add up to 180°

2. Parallel lines never meet

image

Easy, peasy, right?

Wrong.

Get in sailboat and sail in a nice big triangle around the Pacific Ocean (or any ocean you like).

Oh dear. Looks like all the angles in a triangle can easily add up to >180°. And ALL of them can be right triangles, too.

image

Take one run completely around the globe, and have your friends take a parallel course, and you will cross paths. The distance around the globe is finite, but the lines never end.

image

Everything you learned in Grade Three is true, as long as you are working on a plane. Curve the space, and everything is false.

image

Mathematical axioms can easily be BOTH true and false at the same time, which is way of saying NEITHER true nor false.

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/EllipticGeometry.html

And honestly, I think that’s where we are at with rape culture. I sincerely believe that most women who claim they were raped TRULY believe they were. They are operating in Euclidian space. Of course, there are point blank liars and false accusers, and the number of those may actually be pretty high.

http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/feminist-lies-feminism/why-would-edmontons-karen-smith-lie/

But the rest of the ladies, the so-called “one in four” really, truly, deeply believe they were raped. And as long as we use their definition of rape, they were.

But an alternate definition is available, and I think it’s one that most men use: every adult human is responsible for their own decisions, no matter how drunk or impaired they are (either by intoxicants or socialization or fear or resignation). Men are operating in non-Euclidian space.

And if we use that definition, then virtually none of the sexual encounters women describe as rape qualify as actual rape.

If we assume that the spaces we operate in are vastly, completely different, then both definitions of rape are TRUE, and both are FALSE at the same time. That leaves us only to consider consequences.

Who pays in terms of real, measurable, economic and social loss? Cupcake who thinks she was raped has some therapy bills to ruck up for, but the accused risks his entire life. He can be jailed. His life can be utterly destroyed. He can be barred from certain occupations for life. Even an allegation later proven to be completely false can have ruinous consequences.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2348532/The-woman-accused-stranger-Facebook-rape--ruined-victims-life.html

Women demand the right to have their definition, and only their definition of space apply.

It’s like setting sail across the ocean believing plane geometry to be the only truth. When those parallel lines cross (and they WILL cross), you better hope it’s not a Supertanker you erroneously believed would never cross your path.

image

Following this post is M3, writing in depth about how our perceptions of rape, hinging on agency and responsibility, are just so different.

Different spaces, indeed.

Lots of love,

JB

Enoch #fundie voy.com

'>about drug resistant bugs,' The toleration and even promotion of fornication can have disastrous effects, even on non-fornicators. Those who fornicate contract diseases. Sodomists are particularly likely to contract diseases. The result is that our heroic medical services throw antibiotics at the diseases. The result of this is to kill off the strains of pathogens which are suseptible to the antibiotics. That leaves alive the rare resistant pathogens, which will then procede to multiply and become common pathogens. Persons who do not fornicate may become the recipient of some of these pathogens, but then find out that the strain is resistant to the drugs available. God is not mocked. Whatsoever a man sows, that he shall also reap. The Lord has been very gracious to us, allowing our scientists to discover and develop wonderful antibiotics. During the Civil War, with no antibiotics, a bullet in the gut meant death from infection. How can we be so foolish as to squander and dispise the grace of God and destroy our wonder drug antibiotics by promoting sin.

The "Oiling the Slope" Award

For Excellence in PLEASE STOP FUCKING DOING THAT

crossspeci.es #fundie cultureghost.net

Rejecting "Double Bigotry" - Zoophobia Does Not Justify Homophobia | Cross Species Alliance

As institutionalized bigotry against the gay community becomes less and less acceptable within American culture, homophobes are finding it increasingly difficult to find support for their hate. Culturally, hating someone because of their sexual orientation no longer is considered an appropriate position to be taken in public - even if homophobia of the private sort continues to be distributed broadly throughout society.

Finding themselves on the losing end of history, the homphobes are engaged in a rear-guard action against the forces of diversity and mutual respect. Hatred - at least, the anti-gay kind of hatred - is quickly going out of style.

Out of this historical moment has come an uniquely prurient justification for anti-gay hatred and discrimination. Most recently, this "double bigotry" was expressed by homophobe Ben Carson, of Johns Hopkins, in an attempt to justify his stance against marriage equality. We quote:

Quote:
"My thoughts are that marriage is between a man and a woman. It's a well-established, fundamental pillar of society and no group, be they gays, be they NAMBLA, be they people who believe in bestiality. It doesn't matter what they are. They don't get to change the definition."


We're not sure what the precise meaning of the phrase "people who believe in bestiality" is intended to be. "Bestiality" - or, to use an accurate term, "zoophilia" - has been documented throughout human history in all recorded human cultures across the globe. Whether one "believes" in its existence or not does not actually impact the reality of its ubiquitous existence as a part of the expressed sexual diversity of the species Homo sapiens sapiens, any more than "believing" in gravity is a prerequisite for falling down a well.

That said, we'll infer that what Dr. Carson intended to convey in this phrase is something along the lines of "people who conclude based on extensive evidence that sexual relations between humans and members of other animal species is not only observationally commonplace, but also a healthy and essential component of human sexual diversity." If that's a fair rephrasing, then we at the Cross Species Alliance are indeed part of that group of people - a growing group of people which includes individuals from academic sexologists through animal welfare activists, noted psychologists, cultural theorists, and a wide range of popular culture figures.

We in this group reject bigotry, and we reject in particular bigotry aimed at unpopular sexual minorities who are targeted by society not due to any harm or other objectively-supported reason, but rather as a result of simple hatred of those who are different, unconventional, misunderstood, or - crucially - historically subjected to social persecution (the "we've always hatred them, who stop now?" argument). We of the Cross Species Alliance reject this bigotry.

The hatred of zoophiles - zoophobia - is no more appropriate within a healthy, diverse society than is the hatred of gay people - homophobia. Both are expressions of human bigotry, and both manifest as discrimination against and persecution of sexual minorities by majority populations. Justifying one - homophobia - by reference to the other - zoophobia - is tragically, ironically flawed both logically and morally. Two hatreds don't make a right, and bigotry doesn't justify more bigotry.

Sadly, the LGBT community has chosen to reject the "double bigotry" of equating same-sex attraction with zoophilia by denouncing zoophilia, and by pointing out that - in recent years, anyway - it's not ok culturally to hate gay people, but it is in fact still considered acceptable to hate (and persecute, and assault, and imprison, and otherwise victimize) zoophiles. This is a cowardly, hypocritical, shameful approach to take. It does no honor to the LGBT world to tacitly embrace zoophobia as part of their ongoing work towards a post-homophobic world.

The Cross Species Alliance rejects bigotry against all healthy, respectful, reciprocal sexual minorities - discriminating against people based on their sexual orientation is wrong, period. Full stop. Justifying one hatred - of gay people - by citing another hatred - of zoophiles - is disgraceful. Conversely, rejecting one hatred - homophobia - is best accompanied by a rejection of the other hatred: zoophobia.

That a form of bigotry - zoophobia - is widespread and largely culturally accepted does not make it right. Mere decades ago, homophobia was exactly that in the United States: widespread and culturally accepted. If our only metric for deciding what groups to hate was to reference what groups are currently hated, there would be no women's rights movement, no civil rights movement, and indeed no progress towards gay rights. Instead, we as a society must question deeply and honestly whether historical hatreds and historical bigotries have a legitimate role in our world today. Homophobia fails that test, and so does zoophobic bigotry.

Those who cling to their hatred of gay people must look elsewhere to rationalize it. Equating that hatred to another hatred actually demonstrates one thing quite clearly: that hatred can never serve as its own justification.

- - -

The Cross Species Alliance (crossspeci.es | @CrossSpecies), formed in 2013, works towards a world free of anti-zoophile bigotry. In conjunction with other groups worldwide, and in partnership with academic and professional subject matter experts, it confronts zoophobia and gives voice to the hundreds of millions of zoophiles worldwide: 1% of the total human population, according to published data. Through media engagement, information dissemination, in-house publications, and zoophile community outreach, the Alliance disseminates practical and theoretical tools to anti-zoophobia activists around the world. Additionally, the Alliance coordinates with the DeepJustice Network (deepjustice.net | @DeepJustice) to fund aggressive legal counsel for persecuted zoophiles, confront zoophobic bigots, and seek civil damages against libelers of zoophiles in print, electronic, and broadcast media. The Cross Species Alliance does not speak for the zoophile community in all its diversity and complexity, but rather provides a platform through which zoophiles can express themselves as individuals and as a global community.

Media and community inquiries for the Cross Species Alliance may be directed to: info@crossspeci.es. Confidentiality of communications is assured, and zealously defended.

Tucker Carlson, James Panero, #conspiracy mediamatters.org

From the June 5 edition of Fox News' Tucker Carlson Tonight:

TUCKER CARLSON (HOST): Almost every nation on Earth has fallen under the yoke of tyranny -- the metric system. From Beijing to Buenos Aires, from Lusaka to London, the people of the world have been forced to measure their environment in millimeters and kilograms. The United States is the only major country that has resisted, but we have no reason to be ashamed for using feet and pounds.

...

JAMES PANERO: I am joining you tonight as an anti-metrite. I'm taking a stand against the metric system -- the original system of global revolution and new world orders.

CARLSON: God bless you, and that's exactly what it is. Esperanto died, but the metric system continues, this weird, utopian, inelegant creepy system that we alone have resisted.

Minjaze #sexist #psycho incels.co

Whenever I read a story about a female being raped, I can't help but smile

Especially if it's a stuck-up jb and the perpetrator is incel looking.
How does it feel? To lose all of that privilege you posses in a single moment? To me, it feels like the sweet nectar of vengeance.

Whores deserve to be violated, if they flaunt their bodies like pieces of meat then they ARE pieces of meat. They are like rabid animals with no self-control, lusting after Chad's cock from the moment they hit puberty to the day they grow old and die. Instead of finding one guy, marrying him, and then having sex they jump from one to another with little regard. Considering their lifestyles, 2-3 dicks forced into their disgusting cunts wouldn't make much of a difference.

The rapists should leave behind a penny or two after they have their way with them - they act like literal whores anyways, lol.

Wenck126 #racist stormfront.org

(In a thread about WW2, someone mentions his ancestor fought against the Nazis in WW2)

I fixed it for you. Daddy fought on the wrong side, troll. I wonder how many American WWII vets have niglet great-grandkids to bounce on their knees?

This is no 'version of "Truth"', this is history that has been deliberately obscurred. Take your little hissy fit elsewhere.

lonelybones1 #sexist reddit.com

I wish guys would stare at me.

I really wish guys my age (18/19) would look at me or even stare. Lots of Stacies complain about it but really they have the gift of beauty and they should realise that. I've gotten to the point that I just crave any male attention (not from old creeps though). It just makes me so sad to see couples everywhere. I've never had a bf and would love to have one. I'm under a lot of stress atm which makes my skin look worse than it already is. Having just moved to Dublin, I feel very lonely and ugly at the same time bc guys aren't chatting me up. Have you got any tips how I could looksmaxxx when under stress or how to keep my skin from getting worse?

Anyone else here on this subreddit living in Dublin? We could meet up if you like.

Bill P #sexist unz.com

I just want my daughter to marry a healthy guy with a good work ethic and a kind heart. Preferably good looking and athletic, too. I’m not so sure she’d find that at MIT or Caltech. Or the Ivies, for that matter. I want vigorous, bouncing grandkids someday, but I shudder at the thought of what she might bring back from those places.

No, I’d rather she spends time with earnest white jocks who like hunting, hiking and fishing in their spare time.

My sons, on the other hand, can go in for all the nerdy pursuits they want. In their case at least I can influence them in a manly direction.

Vox Day #fundie voxday.blogspot.com

"Also, there were probably those who considered that preventing women from getting college degrees was part of the "culture" back then, and that giving women the same oportunities as men would be an example of "cultural collapse"."

Not an example, a necessary causal factor. Women destroy every institution they enter, so it should come as no surprise that their involvement outside the family is a good metric for cultural collapse.

I was laughing at the GoodReads winners selections. You only had to look at the covers to see that women voted for them. And still people wonder why so much literature is shit and book sales are in decline.

Dan Holman #fundie armyofgod.com

George Tiller was not your run-of-the-death-mill baby-killer. He was symbolic of the baby-killing industry. He grew in stature as he handily overcame personal obstacles and professional accusations. He made the black art of baby-killing acceptable, perhaps even noble to the public at large.

Tiller represented the baby-killing industry as their point man. He was the face that baby-killing Americans came to love, and pro-lifers love to hate. With legal impunity, wearing a shark-skin suit, Tiller killed the “big babies” with a smile.

Tiller was well connected, especially after the November Republican defeat. He did not squander his fortune, as most baby-killers do, on wine, women, and drugs; he invested wisely in politicians. Pro-choice to kill Governor Sebelius kept her protégé’ from being charged and convicted of a litany of violations of Kansas law. A rising star in Obama’s administration Sebelius would have taken Tiller along with her. Maybe even a Surgeon General.

Wichita’s perpetual beacon of hope, Troy Newman, promised Tiller’s head on a platter. But every attack on Tiller was thwarted. Hoping against hope Troy petitioned Kansas’s Medical Board to pull Tiller’s license. Poppycock! That simply would not happen. Tiller, acquitted of violating Kansas’s laws, was in no serious trouble with the medical board.

The David and Goliath routine was looking bad for David until an unknown champion appeared on the scene. God’s chosen instrument, with a single bullet to the braincase slew Goliath. Rather than take courage from this change of fortune, Troy and his camp ran the other way thinking “Boy, the Philistines are going to be pissed!”

Sweating bullets, Troy was the first to apologize to both the pro-aborts and pro-lifers. “And gee, we were so close to getting Tiller’s medical license pulled!”

Now that we have set the stage, let us examine the pre-text for why Troy and others renounce this shooters brave, unselfish act: Troy tells us that the shooter is a “coward” and a “vigilante.” We all know what a coward is but the definition of a vigilante is “any person who takes the law into his or her own hands, as by avenging a crime.”

We do not know if the shooter's motive was vengeance or if he was acting in defense of the pre-born. The definition for self-defense and defense of others is “the right for civilians acting on their own behalf to engage in violence for the sake of defending one's own life or the lives of others, including the use of deadly force.”

Self defense and the defense of others is justifiable homicide.

This defense is denied Tiller’s shooter as our laws do not recognize the humanity and worth of the pre-born. Those of us who do recognize the person of the Preborn should understand that the use of force is justifiable in protecting the pre-born children, but such is not the case.

In the posts that I have read from Troy and others they assume the shooter’s motive to be vengeance, rather than defensive action. Troy was quick to condemn Tiller’s shooter without knowing his true motive. You can stab a man’s character as surely as you shoot his person.

I proffer this fine distinction because it is important to hand-wringing soul-searching theologians sorting through the dainty innuendos, presuppositions, and new and old winds of doctrine.

But I do not believe the shooter’s motive to be important, as it amounts to defensive action no matter what his motive was.
Tiller was a serial killer. He killed the week he was killed, and like the punctual rape of every blessed day, he was scheduled to kill again. The shooter’s bullet, like David’s stone, stopped Tiller’s bloody hands cold.

But along with the death of George Tiller, is the toppling of the invincible baby-killing idol of aborticide.

Like the Munchkins in the Wizard of Oz, news of Tiller’s death was at first hard to believe. While many of us broke into a joyful song, others broke into a shameful retreat.

LawrenceOfAperabia #racist niggermania.net

From the files of "never hire a nigger"...

Got into work last night to find an email saying "Meeting at 6, conference room" and the rest of the Watchdogs (our supervisor's name for the night shift quality control team) CC'd. Only time we ever get called in for group meetings, there's either a new project or something has gone seriously wrong in the data integrity process, and you know what they say about bad news and Fridays, so I'm ready for the worst.

The head of our entire department is running the meeting, and he has a look on his face like people get when their loved ones are in surgery and they're waiting for news from the doc. Something's seriously got the guy spooked.

Well, "spooked" turns out to have been the key word. Turns out one of Seattle's local chimpout-for-hire groups has us on their radar because we've hired four niggers since March and none of them have lasted longer than a couple of weeks, and it doesn't look good for the new guy (the one who, earlier this week, I mentioned could not find three pages of pictures in a 300-page block of text.) There have been credible rumors of a discrimination ghetto-lotto attempt, so management has gimcracked up a solution that they hope will prove one way or the other who's right—are we being racist or are niggers that stupid? We're going to do some science.

Each of us is given a block of already-QC'd work that one of the other members of the team did last week and this week; what we're to do is to look at this work, QC it fresh, and they're going to compare the notes and look for false positives. Two hours from end of shift, we're going to get a live feedback report, so meet back in the conference room later.

Fast forward through a lot of concentrated frustration QCing nothing but nigger work, in which a lot of muttered "c'mon, man" and "are you kidding me, how do you screw that up?!" can be overheard from "the doghouse", to the point where someone from the night data pool had to be assured that "it's not you, don't worry" Missing photo addenda, documents pulled from God knows where that are garbled gibberish, and literally a zero percent hit rate on files completely correct (our team average is over 80 percent on that metric, and the remaining 20 is usually minor corrections like a nitpick over something silly like a misused comma.)

We all take a 15-minute break at once right before the meeting...and catharsis ensues. "Can you believe that idiot?" "Is Taco Bell hiring? And if so, can they make sure he doesn't work at the one in my neighborhood?" "A trained chimp could do that job and he can't." And even, from one of our more crunchy-granola-bar group members, "they say we're racist, I don't care what color you are, that's just incompetence" (truth about niggers, kid. You'll learn it!)

And sure enough, the conference goes exactly as the best-case scenario would indicate. Big boss comes in, and to pick up that guy-in-the-hospital-waiting-room metaphor, this is like the surgeon coming out and saying "don't worry, the surgery was a complete success, we got all of it, your mother will make a complete recovery."

Turns out they waited until Friday because they're going to fire the nigger over the phone, just tell him "don't come in on Monday", deactivate his keycard, and alert building security to call the police if they see him on site. They didn't outright say "because we're pretty sure he'll chimp out and someone might get hurt." They didn't have to. It's a nigger buck. They know how niggers are when someone beez disrespekkin' dey ass.

And NAAN or Bureau of Land Management or whoever initiated this "youz be rayciss"? Their lawyers are getting a polite but firm "he was fired for cause and here's the data" if they push the point.

Saturday mornings are so much nicer when they're hard-earned, eh?

wac3rd #fundie freerepublic.com

They have a pass under Barack Hussein Obama, infinitum.

If Obama or the Liberals ask for another company to be smashed by Government regualations and there is any pushback, he can always pull the "I killed Osama Bin Laden" card. Forever. When my grandkids turn on History Channel in 2050, they will see a documentary showing a black President killing a boogeyman and then returning to the White House for another 4 years, bringing Socialism to the United States and eventually ushering the New World Order run by Soros and the Global Elites.

The celebration was staged also to coincide with the World Workers Day on May 1st, so the Marxists, Communists, Open Borders and Unions can all rememeber this as a day of celebration, and rally their troops to push for more Stalinist programs. Nothing is an accident with these Democrats (Axelrod, Soros, MSM).

Mark my words, unless there is another attack on US soil in the next 1.5 years, Obama will remain President through 2016...focus on the next VP pick, as they will be grooming whomever runs with Obama in 2012 for the 2016 election...like the Chinese, there is a master plan years ahead of time, as the dimbulb GOP has morons like Lindsay Graham and pack-a-day Boehner weep over a 0.0003% cut from an anticipated budget.

The end of America as we know it has come, the collapse is imminent and you should prepare now for the coming insurrection.

An evil madman is dead and another is still in power at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.

God Bless, FReepers, pray hard in the coming months.

cheee #fundie freerepublic.com

Personally, I’d rather the gays just get back in the closet. If there are so many gay-haters out there looking to beat them up, wouldn’t it be safer for the gays? Turns out the out-of-the-closet, in-your-face gay movement is getting the special privleges they want ... and next they’re coming after our kids and grandkids.

KingOfRome #crackpot incels.co

If cucks didn't assume we were average looking despite everything we say, they wouldn't have a leg to stand on

We have guys who are below 5'4, guys with cartoonish frog eyes, guys who've been balding since they were teenagers, even guys with crippling life threatening disabilities. Being well below average is the norm here, and I can say that in full confidence because we're more than vocal enough about our subpar looks and even share pictures. It's reasonable to take any claim to ugliness at face value since men by and large overrate their looks, not underrate.

So why blindly assume we're all average looking despite our every insistence that we're not? Wouldn't Occam's Razor behoove them to take our word at face value since ugliness is both the simplest and, according to numerous peer reviewed professional studies, the most likely cause of inceldom in most men?

Why would it? Then they'd be shitting on innocent victims of circumstance. That would make them bullies. Can't have that, can we? No, we need to be frothing-at-the-mouth narcissistic basement-dwelling morbidly obese pedophile sadists who are racist, sexist, transphobic, xenophobic, islamophobic, and every kind of -ist and -phobic imaginable with dispositions like a Tasmanian devil and hygiene worse than maggots, since they know deep down that an average looking guy has to be a complete caricature of a human being to be truly incel due to how little personality actually matters in the SMP. They can't punch down without needing some prissy moral justification for it. They're too weak.

CelibatePower #sexist #fundie reddit.com

The destructive power of the feminine force.

Some might think, I am sounding a bit anti-woman. But for the sake of ones own progress in life, hear me out. This is written about extensively by SWAMI SIVANANDA.

I must unserstand that the clarity of all that is Good in consciousness comes from abstaining from the woman. See, I find indulgence in passion, real or imagined leads to degredation.

Then comed the question.."Do I want to be a vessel of Divinity..?".. "Or partake in the indulgence of ego." - For when we partake OF the woman, the seal of spiritual power is sliced, depending on the depth of indulgence.

Good, Bad, I'm the Guy with the Gun.
The "Gun" being - "The Power." - the power is like a cup filled with everlasting life. It is pureed to the tilt. One mis-step can lead a spill in the drop of life. The "Pretty" faces we see in our day to day life can easily cause us to "mis-step" with our cup of everlasting life.

Being overly emotional, or even slightly passionate in the beginning stages of the 'path' can cause a drop in the everlasting life. Mindfulness of our thoughts is paramount. Holding our 'cup' as we traverse forward, getting stronger each day.

Some fools re-joice in the presence of the lady. Their hearts jump when she bats her eyelashes and throws her hair. These same fools who hold their cup of life would give their power away in the blink of an eye.

The womans presence can often have a man question his lifes direction. WHAT is more important to you? Steadfastly focusing with white-lighted intent forever burning into the timeline of life with your purpose?

Or using your power to be given away to a lovers fling? This is the decision we all must make.

Blessed and righteous..
Is he who holds his power and integrity for himself. You cannot fake 'the power' - it is only given and accumulated with time and purpose, mindfulness in the midst of the feminine presence and what not.

Today, a righteousman is few and far between. Bombarded with imagery of concubines the the 'other' life that leads to dependency and misery.

Be the man with the gun. Righteous walk, righteous talk, and righteous intention.

Rise above the woman.
The true nature of man is to lead. Rise above the devils that have taken hold of our minds. Kick down the exhaulted image of woman. The false idol that has been put above us. Destroy that Golden-godess image and walk forward.

Never give the temptress what they want. They are the tools of the devil. Get them out of your way. Let the temptresses that feed off trickery and attention be trampled and bombarded by our boots of righteousness.

Even with the power, we develop the senses of discernment. We discern righteous women who loom youthful and fully of life. Be cautious. Assert domimance and put them to work. They have much to prove in this life.

Walk the path of light. Do not fantasize about romantic notions and bullshit that will tie you down. If a woman cannot be chaste, cannot back your play, or get behind and support you, kick her out of your way. Cast her down to the weak and unrighteous.

Walk your rignteous path of power and achievement. Be free. In the days of old, the women tended the gardens, prepared the food, maintained the household, weaved baskets, and other womanly duties. Such is her place.

The men fought. Killed. Hunted. Built structures and negotiated the deals. And lead the family. Nothing has changed from our primitive instincts other then technology softening the man.

Kick the notion of woman down and become the strength. The blood. The power. The force. Through clear mind, clear will, a chaste heart. Assert domimance once again like the days of old.

Edit:

Some may think i sound incel or anti-woman. I ask you this. Do men share bunks with women in boot-camp? Tyson fury, world champion boxer, did not see his wife for 3 months in preparation for training for his comeback fight.

Some of us have squandered away many years in lust, clouding our judgement from the path. I am not anti-woman. But i feel sometimes sacrafices must be made for the greater good of your progress.

When Rocky was training to fight, he and Adrian started to get hot and heavy. Then he stops her and says "I cant" - "I need everything I got." (Or something along those lines) - So sometimes laser focus is needed to accomplish good things. She backed his play and supported him every step.

This does not mean you have to be an 'incel' (a derogatory remark coined for men trying to improve themself) - what about 'volcel' / voluntarily celibate for a time being to transcend the lower states, and rise above the bullshit?

The sexual / porn haze can leave a man stunted for a while, and even in recovery the day to day interactions can lead him following ego and lust while perusing interactions with the woman. Why not give it a break..?

atm #fundie teens-4-christ.org

[An example of the kind of bullshit admins at T4C pull when they don't like what someone says in a post.]

{edit}
Well i don't know if you noticed or not, but when i originally posted my first post, i stated that i was a {edit}. i don't know why, but that part isn't in there now. {edit} is basically a philosophy saying 'my life has no comprehensible meaning,' {edit} i don't believe in god anymore, i don't believe in satan, i don't believe in science, i believe that my life doesn't have meaning until i find its meaning, {edit}

Vogon Poetry Award

Zero_Sum #sexist incelistan.net

I was trying to make this below into a sort of haiku.

Modern Woman.

She only loves me for my money, occupation, social influence, property, bank account, and wallet, she calls this sexual usury love or romance. I bend her over on the bed and slide a credit card between her legs, in her wet ■■■■ I make my biological deposit within financial exchange where her internal lubricant greases my ball sack on the bed. She tells me that she’ll love me no matter what but I know this is untrue upon becoming financially bankrupt.

I’m out of cash on hand where I need to go to the local ATM machine for the vaginal promise land.

Come on baby, take me to the vaginal promise land, look here, I have ample amounts of abundant cash on hand!

Am I financially solvent enough for you, here’s my yearly income statement as proof!

I see the dollar signs in her eyes and that is the only way I can get access between her thighs. I pull up a credit card key pad and hook it up to her clitoris, as I push the buttons it stimulates upon climax.

I want to slap her on the ass but she says that I must be of a very particular specific socio-economic class.

I want her to like me for just being me, but she keeps insisting how love or romance is not free proclaiming that I must pay an adequate sized fee.

Come on baby, I’m just looking for some warmth all alone here by myself, why does it always have to come down to economic individual self worth?

Upon bending her naked body and ass over the bed as I cop a feel on her breasts, she turned around to me with a smile happily, “My love is not free for it is only to rent and own with additional fees. I accept Mastercard, VISA, traveler’s checks, cash, and Bitcoin. If I should ever become impregnated by you I fully expect a diamond ring on my finger per sexual contract and with the children I will own the household as I linger.”

I felt like I was buying livestock or a stubborn mule ass as part of the sexual financial negotiations, but in the end I just wanted to get my dick wet. Having an understanding of each other holding her naked ass with both of my hands with the sexual contract in mind I was all set.

As the sexual intercourse proceeded she kept yelling moaning out upon orgasming, love me, love me! All I could think to myself is that with this hooker or prostitute overtime there will be an endless amount of additional fees.

Upon reflection of future marriage with this prostitute I am merely buying, financially completing, and purchasing the final deed of sexual property which she could end randomly at any time. Why can’t I afford her physical and mental affections on a basic dime!?

[User inserts pic of woman on cell phone with sheep surrounding her, chemtrails above, and tons of ads behind her]

Enigmatic93 #sexist reddit.com

Incels have legitimate reasons to dislike women beyond "They won't fuck me"

It wouldn't be that bad if women simply ignored us and declined our advances but it goes a lot deeper than that.

They actively go out of their way to make us feel like shit by calling us creepy just for existing. I'm sure some of you remember the thread where security harassed a guy for sitting to close to a girl despite being a table apart. This stuff happens to ugly guys all the time through no fault of their own. They get the creepy label attached to them despite never actually doing anything creepy and minding their own business.

Women also have tendency to use guys as emotional tampons and ATMs. Incels don't have female freinds. At best they have women who use them when they need something.

Last, but not least, they often lie about how looks attracts them to a man or downplay how important looks are. They will often tell you that it is a guy's personality or confidence or sense of humor and other corny shit that attracts them to a guy, but as soon a guy like Jeremy Meeks shows up and wets panties across the globe despite being a criminal, all of that bullshit goes out the window.

EDIT: This is also not to mention the other microaggressions women act out against uglier men such as wearing revealing clothing but covering up whenever an incel looks at them, or moving seats on public transportation etc. I may expand on this in another thread.

Anonymous Coward #fundie #conspiracy godlikeproductions.com

Is Bill Gates the antichrist?

All this population control, Orwellian surveillance, economic and media manipulation, we can all see it leads to a digital prison planet.

At the head of that project, sits Bill Gates, one of the richest people of the world for a long time.

He financed vaccine research and promotion,
He is declared as supporting population reduction (not limiting, reduction)

He financed Quantum Dot digital tattoos that are planned to hold information on who is allowed to travel because he took his vaccines.

So, after controlling software of 70% of the worlds computers for decades, having a history of dirty play in business, suppressing open source software platforms and movements, forcing his company into governments worldwide...

He is now the savior that has been tirelessly working behind the scenes to save humanity from SARS Corona Viruses. He financed Event 201, which took part exactly at the time this virus started taking first victims in China.

The prophecy says the Anti-Christ will fool everyone and offer solutions to worlds problems and be accepted as a hero, and given power over the world.

Along with calls for a one world government, how many here would bet this guy is meant for a leading role?

For me, it fits the description.

I will not bother with links atm, all of these are public facts affirmed by the man himself.

popeiscool #sexist reddit.com

[Re: Oxford ends women-only fellowship after university rules that it breaches equality law]

Men are doing awfully in British schools and universities but we still pretend it's 1960 and casual sexism against women in education is the norm. It isn't, they outnumber men and do better than them by all metrics I'm aware of.

Baby boomers have clung onto positions of power for far longer than any previous generations did and the consequence is that we are still suffocated by their 50 years outdated second-wave feminist counterculture and perceptions of misogyny being a huge problem in education when it really isn't.

I'm not saying the next generation of leaders will be any better, just that some of the idiocy we have today is because of mentalities about female attainment and opportunity that are long, long outdated.

Jim Inhofe #fundie tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com

[Senator Jim Inhofe (R-OK) on not attending his town's "Holiday Parade of Lights"]

"But you know, this is a bigger picture," said Inhofe. "You look around the country, you see the atheist billboards, you see the New York school board saying you can't have a nativity scene but you can have a Muslim star, the North Carolina school board taking Christmas off the calendar.

"You know, I would expect it some other places, but not here in Oklahoma. So my decision was a personal decision. I'm not really boycotting it -- I'm just not gonna be there. To me, last time I checked, Gretchen, Christmas meant the birth of Jesus Christ, and that's what we're celebrating, that's what I'm celebrating, that's what my 20 kids and grandkids are celebrating."

[...]

"I did not do so last year because I'm not going to ride in a Christmas parade that doesn't recognize Christmas," he said. "I am hopeful that the good people of Tulsa and the city's leadership will demand a correction to this shameful attempt to take Christ, the true reason for our celebration, out of the parade's title. Until the parade is again named the Christmas Parade of Lights, I will not participate."

Joey888 #conspiracy wnd.com

The next FALSE FLAG of any significance will, IMHO, come sometime AFTER this year. Yeah... Obama will let everyone watch their baseball playoffs, then the football games this year, have a great thanksgiving and Christmas, then watch out for what happens right after New Year's day. Even before O-Liar can do his STATE OF THE UNION speech, which everyone by now knows is pure lie after lie, he will tell the big bankers to get ready because the Fed Res Bank will be told to raise the interest rate, thus creating chaos in the stock market (which is rigged) and then it will come crashing down a thousand or so points in one day, like it should have already done so by now. Then the banks will have a bank holiday and the ATMs will run out of money, chaos will reign in the streets, then MARTIAL LAW. The beginning of the end of the USA. Obama will start his 3rd term in office, but it will be just like this... ALL HELL WILL BREAK LOOSE AND WE THE PEOPLE ARE SCREWED. LIGHTS OUT.

Mainländer #sexist incels.co

[OP of thread "[Experiment] Dick quotas"]

I just had a genius idea to make society and the sexual market fairer. We all know being a dicklet sucks and foids will ridicule you for it, and most men want to fuck JBs, so why don't we make the AoC dependent on the guy's dick size?

If your cock is 3 inches or less, the AoC is 12 for you.
If your cock is between 3 and 4 inches, the AoC is 13 for you.
If your cock is between 4 and 5 inches, the AoC is 14 for you.
If your cock is between 5 and 6 inches, the AoC is 15 for you.
If your cock is between 6 and 7 inches, the AoC is 16 for you.
If your cock is between 7 and 8 inches, the AoC is 17 for you.
If your cock is 8 inches or more, the AoC is 18 for you.

Everyone wins.

[JB stands for "jailbait" while AoC stands for "age of consent"]

Deacon Frost #fundie sythe.org

I wanted to explore this a bit as I'm self-studying utilitarianism atm, and trying to figure out how the whole thing works. Figured I'd present an argument, and have some other perspectives.

Right and Wrong can be determined by what is rational and what is irrational. Rational and irrational can be determined by what brings about the most pleasure and what brings about the most pain. (TDD pointed this out: Rational and Irrational can be determined by what course leads to the most pleasure vs. the most pain. (Can't get the right words >.<))

Atheists have a hard time as they're surrounded by folks who constantly attack them for not falling to their knees and worshipping. This is painful. Therefore, not changing is irrational, and therefore, being an Atheist is wrong.

Being a theist of any kind is more accepted as a social norm, thus making life easier, thus minimizing stress and optimizing pleasure, thus making it rational, thus making it right.

Am I right?

Padraig Martin #racist identitydixie.com

[From ""Distinguishing Southern Nationalism"]

Over the last week or so, I have received criticism for my attacks on generic White Nationalism, the so-called Alt-Right and Nazi LARPers. Generally, these are attacks from weak keyboard kommandos and obese geriatric geldings, some of whom mistook the original intended target. Regardless, given the reaction, it seems I struck a nerve. Good!

The vast majority of those who threw threats in my direction could not bench press an AR-15. Some of those who took shots at the latest round of strategic posts are intellectually too soft to see past their myopic understanding of our current predicament. Bowl Patrol? If you cannot see that someone like Dylann Roof would have done more strategically for “White People” by not being a psychopath, actually engaging in positive networking and community fellowship, then you lack strategic clarity. You are inferior in every single way – mentally and morally. You are useless. Go back to whatever leader du jure of your movement is taking pictures of himself in his underwear.

If you are serious about doing something for your people, let’s take an honest look at the differences within the movement: Southern Nationalism vs Generic White Nationalism.

Identity Dixie is a Southern Nationalist content producer. That is who we are. Generally speaking, ours is a fraternal group that seeks to build a Nationalist consensus within the South. The goal is to intellectually and emotionally lay the ground work for an independent South. Some members of Identity Dixie are also members of other groups that have aligned goals, but at their core, Identity Dixie contributors work the Southern zeitgeist. We are not the guys on street corners or running around in the woods playing Rambo on the weekends. We are the guys who convince the normie Southerner that he has a better future in a Free South.

What Identity Dixie is not is a generic White Nationalist entity. We obviously do not hate White people, but not all White people are the same. The Whites who call themselves Anti-Fascists are not my White people. Nor for that matter are Boston Brahmins. I went to graduate school with Boston Brahmins, they hate you and me. Generic White is simply not a good enough distinction.

I will root for White people in other areas of the country to do well, but they are not my own. Not all Whites are made equal. The German-American descendants of the 48ers, who comprise the rank and file of both AntiFa and the Alt-Right, have very little in genetic common with me other than skin color. The only ideological difference between the two groups is their brand of genocidal collectivism (one being crusty anarcho-communism, with a simmering hatred for Heritage America, and the other some form of authoritarianism, as long as it’s pro-white). Otherwise, they are almost identical. Their general hatred of Christianity and their support for socialism are entirely foreign concepts to me.

One other key similarity between AntiFa and the Alt-Right is their assumption that they will save the United States. True Southern Nationalists have no interest at all in saving the Empire. The United States is dead. It is a stinking, rotting carcass. The smell of its decomposition is evident in the Affirmative Action company commander, with an 85 IQ, leading your Southern enlisted sons into battle. She graduated with a 4.0 GPA from West Point because her Marxist professors wanted to achieve a social justice objective. White people did that. More specifically, Northern Whites empowered this marginally literate officer. Had she gone to the Virginia Military Institute, her inferior self would have transferred to Richmond Community College before she completed Hell Week. Now, her Communist Chinese counterpart is laughing, confident that he can beat an army led by incompetents in a week. He is right.

You can thank Northern Whites for your modern country.

And before you give me a diatribe about the JQ, just stop. Whites founded America. Prior to its existence, it was a massive forest comprised of wild savages, hunting and enslaving one another. They were conquered by Europeans. Towns and cities were erected by Whites. Institutions were established by Whites. If we assume Whites are superior, how did they let everything get taken by a tribe of Khazar gypsies? Let’s face a cold hard fact: three percent of the population did not weasel their way into power. Heritage Americans got lazy and gave it away – the same as they did when they sent their manufacturing to China. Specifically, Northern Whites gave it away. If I want to be even more specific, a cabal of Boston Yankees and German 48ers from the Midwest and Pennsylvania gave away the country that Anglo-Saxons and Scots-Irish built.

Why in God’s name would I want to align myself with the same Whites who get an occasional generational itch to dismantle the South?

Northern Whites first dismantled the antebellum South, a White dominated society, through a mass invasion. Northern Whites literally raped, pillaged, and starved Southerners, compelling them to remain in a Union against their will. Then they not only freed the slaves, they empowered them in local positions of governance throughout Reconstruction. Suddenly, I am supposed to look past their history and find myself aligned with their descendants because we share the same skin color?

Less than one hundred years later, the grandparents of these same generic White Nationalists lamented segregation. They demanded that the 101st Airborne march into Arkansas and impose integrated schools. It was a Wisconsin White gunman, Arthur Bremer, descendant of a 48er, who shot segregationist, George Wallace. Northerners later fought to reduce his sentence and they succeeded.

If the apple does not fall far from the tree, why would I now suddenly align myself with the grandkids of Midwestern Marxists? No thank you. Rather, I will align myself with my father’s people, many of whom fought and died to protect the Anglo-Celtic society upon which the South is based.

The fact is, the Alt-Right is full of socialists. They were raised praising Sherman, Grant, and Eisenhower – men who destroyed the South. They love themselves some Lincoln. They have nothing in common with Southerners. They cannot be trusted. So what if some guy in Vermont or Pennsylvania flies a Confederate Battle Flag? How edgy, bruh! That may resonate with your fellow militant egalitarians who equate imagery with purpose. It simply tells me the guy has nice taste in flags.

At the end of the day, generic White Nationalism is a fool’s endeavor. It is bound to fail. Southern Nationalists know they will have to go it alone. The socialists who comprise the majority of the rank and file of White Nationalists want to revive an American corpse.

In sum, keep your generic White Nationalism. Keep your bowl patrol. Keep your pagan imagery. This is not about optics for me. This is not about some short term edgy phase in my life. The Southerners with whom I daily interact are the legacy of a multi-generational quest to establish their own country, predicated on hierarchical stratification, Anglo-Saxon norms, and Christian values. We may not be perfect, but at the end of the day, we are not LARPy pseudo-Nazis.

Good luck and enjoy your pool parties.

Society for Psychical Research #fundie spr.ac.uk

The early SPR researchers established the main methodological principles and areas of research. The study of mediumship continued, providing much information on aspects of human personality and altered states of consciousness, and helping to perfect investigative techniques. Field investigations were carried out, and further collections, analyses and surveys of spontaneous phenomena were published.

Following the general trend – seen also in psychology – towards an experimental, more biological approach, experimental methods continued to undergo refinements. Pioneering work on free-response and quantitative experiments was carried out in the 1920s and 1930s by George Tyrrell, a British mathematician and physicist; he explored methods for inducing altered states of consciousness, designing techniques to differentiate between telepathy and clairvoyance and attempting to automate the randomisation of targets.

However, the centre of this activity shifted to America, with the establishment of JB Rhine’s Parapsychology Laboratory at Duke University in the 1930s. While SPR researchers continued to experiment, the organisation evolved during this period from an investigative to a mainly educational body. From its earliest days the Society began creating a specialist library and an archive of original documents, housed both at its offices in London and at Cambridge University Library. Its Journal and Proceedings, published since the 1880s, offer a wealth of material relating to investigations and experiments past and present, as well as theoretical studies and papers discussing the relationship between psychical research and fields such as psychology, philosophy, physics, medicine, evolutionary biology and social sciences.

Today, the SPR continues to promote and support the main areas of psychical research, carrying out field investigations, surveys and experimental work. It holds no corporate view about the true origin and meaning of psi – as telepathic and other psychical phenomena are now collectively termed - and debate among its members with regard to particular subjects is often vigorous. However, it’s fair to say that from the earliest times the consensus view of its members – and of the psi research community in general – has been that psi is real, and that while the phenomena should certainly be explained in scientific terms, such a science does not at present exist.

The Society’s work has inevitably brought it into conflict with sceptics who believe that purely naturalistic explanations of psi phenomena can and must be found, and who strive to re-interpret researchers’ findings in terms of fraud and misperception. In recent years, the field has faced a growing campaign by ideologically-motivated activists determined to discourage interest in these matters, in order to support scientific naturalism against a perceived threat of superstition. Their work is particularly in evidence in the free encyclopedia Wikipedia, where articles on psi topics are now uniformly ‘balanced’ with the negative opinions of sceptical authors and campaigners, to the point where they have become confusing and misleading.

The SPR continues to argue the value of objective research and dispassionate elucidation of facts, regardless of their metaphysical implications. It has an important educational role to play, disseminating accounts of its work, and of psi research generally, for the benefit of individuals and for writers, journalists and broadcasters whose work may at times touch on these subjects.

Various incels #sexist reddit.com

(mogs_me)
MFW I remember my mom told me I'll have lots of girlfriends thorough the high school and college when I was in elementary

image

" youre so handsome son! "

Bitch lied straight to my face everytime

(bcat124)
"You'd be handsome if you had rhinoplasty" followed by a nervous laughter, and a continuous obsession with my height by asking me every single month "Are you the shortest boy in your class?" . The answer was almost always yes.

That's all I got from my mother. Oh yeah, she also told me a giga-bluepill every now and then "you know, girls don't care about looks"

(cstein45)
Im in college and my mom still tells me that

(old_pair_of_socks)
She is just coping, because she knows that there is no chance in having grandkids.

(surfindude5)
My mom even said once that she has to restrain herself from being attracted to me and laughed. That was weird, and a lie

(darkclouds77)
Get some mom action or volcel

(sodomcel)
my mum says the exact opposite. she constantly tells me how woman are shallow, materialistic and im better off being alone. maybe she is just sparing the hardship of being cucked or maybe she's just readying me up for a reality of being forever alone

pnw2016 #racist city-data.com

There was a time when blacks were legally regarded to be three-fifths of a person.

As their behavior has consistently shown, that was an insanely generous over-appraisal.

I'm sick of these noisy tax-draining savages and all of their crime!

Many others become enlightened every day. They're ignoring pro-diversity TV shows with the canned laughter and applause, intended to influence their inner thoughts. They're tuning-out the leftist propaganda spewed by "diversity instructors". If diversity is such a natural thing, why would anybody need instruction in it?

Then, there's the utter hypocrisy of blacks walking around with signs stating that "Black lives matter", when they kill each other like there's no tomorrow (and not much left of today).

People are getting sick of watching blacks destroy the countries their ancestors built. They're getting tired of seeing their hard-earned tax dollars squandered on blacks. And, they're getting very angry about all of it.

I'm going to be stuck in "multicultural paradise" for about 18 more months. After that, I'll be joining the "Northwest Migration" of Whites to the Pacific Northwest. I cannot wait...

W. F. Price #fundie the-spearhead.com

[On the Greek myth of the Amazonomachy]

Greek artists and thinkers understood that there was, and always has been, a power struggle between the sexes. Men and women complement each other, of course, but doesn’t the deer complement the mountain lion, and doesn’t the sheep complement the wolf? Biology is not a simple matter of cooperation, even within species. It would be stupid to think of it as such, and the Greeks made a conscious decision to prioritize civilization over the barbarism of matriarchy. Nothing better illustrated that concept at the time than the Amazonomachies.

The ancient Greeks were strugging against societies that saw them as fanatics. The supine potentates of surrounding states must have asked: “Who are these men to demand rights and a voice over their rulers? Surely, they should bow down to kings and queens, and relinquish this odd concept of manhood.” But they stood their ground, defining their struggle according to what appeared before their eyes.

...

Despite the misappropriation of the term “progressive” in contemporary America resulting in a warped concept of human progress, surely an irony befitting ancient Babylon, progress was at one time a desperate effort, and the Greeks fought against great odds to leave us with the blueprint upon which we built modern civilization.

If, like today’s simpering politicians, Greek men had bowed down before their wives and sisters, debasing themselves and squandering their efforts in order to appease the mother goddess, we would have been left with none of the marble pillars of civilization, but rather the misshapen mud huts of matriarchy.

In this spirit, we should celebrate the victories over the wanton Amazon women. Each stroke of sword and thrust of spear into the defiant, struggling Amazon warriors was another step in the construction of a better way of life. As Theseus plucked Hippolyta from the midst of a frenzied horde of howling women, carrying her off as a reluctant trophy, it was as though he were a fisherman hauling an ignorant mass of savages ashore. Thus was Athens, the seed of Western civilization, planted in victory in the heaving womb of barbary.

...

Today, as rockets burst forth from a speechless earth, as marvels of medicine save the lives of otherwise lost victims, and as we unlock the mysteries of the cosmos, we still resort to the language and thought of the few brave men of ancient Greece, reaching back to that indomitable spirit that subjugated even the Amazons, those women who still clamor and press up against us in spirit in an effort to shove us back into the abyss of darkness. If we give in and relinquish our patrimony, we have failed our forefathers, and don’t deserve to be called men.

Wyatt Junker #fundie fstdt.com

Wrong. You said infinite and infinite is infinite and that's how evolution gave us weird infinite shit so let's play the infinity game of extremes and still work within the confines of free will. Say you get some strange urge to fuck a monkey. Its your freewill, right? Okay then. Now, let's say your kids also have a knack for monkey fucking. Following? Great.

Now, let's say after all this interspecies ass reaming sessions, your great great great great great great, infinitely great grandkid sports an anatomical steering wheel out of his head. Sounds outlandish? Great. So does evolution. You and the rest of your atheistic shills are the product of an infinite number of retard fucks over time. Its your gay little religion. I think its some funny ass shit, sure. But, brother... its your gospel. I hope you stick with it, you fuckin inbred.

CARLO ABRUZZI #racist usa.forzanuova.info

White People are Dying Off

The Anglos with their Zionist masters defeated the forces of nationalism during WW2 to ensure that your grandkids will be named Mohammed and you will die off. The average birthrate of the EU is 1.5 children for every women. Throw on feminism, Cultural Marxism, Zionism, and mass immigration and you get the total death of Europe by 2050. We desperately need a return to Nationalism or we are finished. It’s game over buddies, we are all going under unless a major shift happens in the next decade. 

John Hendryx #fundie monergism.com

Consider this.  If a person borrows $1 billion to fund a company and then goes and squanders it in a week of wild living in Las Vegas, his inability to repay the debt does not alleviate him of the responsibility to do so.  Our condition in Adam is like a debt we cannot repay.  We are responsible.  The command to believe the gospel is to be proclaimed to all men. All are responsible to believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God who was crucified for sinners, then rose from the dead and that He grants forgiveness of sin to ALL who believe. But when the synergist says but "men may be saved if they will." we must reply, "Agreed, we all believe that; however, it is the "if they will" that is the difficulty. Are men ever found NATURALLY willing to submit to the humbling terms of the gospel of Christ? Jesus Himself declares that no man will come to Christ unless God grants it (John 6:63-65).

LawrenceOfAperabia #racist niggermania.net

We just got a new client at work, and that means we had to hire on a group of people to handle the workload, and that means you look down the roster and it's "human, human, human, human, nigger" because "commitment to diversity" is a selling point in crunchy-granola-bar Seattle.

Of course, you don't have to be a niggermaniac to know how this story always ends. Nigger is out of its depth, fucks up the work, either gets fired or quits when it realizes the job isn't just "sit on your ass pretending to be busy and collect paycheck".

This time, however, I've got a bit more seniority in QC and don't have to deal with nigger work myself. So I decided to assign a bunch of the control stuff to the girl I mentioned in another story, new to QC, "every color but black" and a bit of a NM herself...and who my lead, seeing she and I get along well, assigned me to mentor in the dark alchemy of turning shoddy rookie work into things we can present to the client. I let her know I'd have her QCing the trainees so she could get some reps in a no-pressure environment.

She's been great about delivering accurately-edited work to me; as I expected (and as the leads did when they promoted her), she weathers bullshit well.

Last night, though, in the break room, she came right up to me and asked "who is DJones?" and I said "Oh, you mean Darnell." (note: name changed to keep everything anonymized.)

"The black guy on day shift?"

"The very same. Why?"

"Because if he's as dumb as his work makes him look, he's too dumb to work at Burger King. He got the photo addendum wrong."

I nearly spat out my coffee.

The photo addendum my charge is referring to involves looking through about a 300-page document, finding three pages with three photographs each on them, putting them in order (and they're numbered 1 through 9), and extracting them as a PDF.

"I wonder how long it's taking him," I asked, more rhetorically than anything, and when coworker said "you can see his metrics, right? Why not check?" I did. A task that is literally "page through a document and when you see pictures, stop" was taking this monkey 10 minutes. We allow 90 seconds for it, and a quick-handed and alert-eyed person can do it in 30.

Then she said the very best thing, and I like to think she's comfortable around me and knows what's what and doesn't say this around people who might actually get a bug up their butt at her because she's great:

"Somehow I'm not surprised, are you?"

There is a nigger in my office who is making more than even Seattle's $15 minimum wage and cannot do something that my six-year-old niece would consider beneath her intellectually if her kindergarten teacher foisted such an assignment off on her. Welcome to the Watchdogs, new girl...you will always know when a nigger has been hired. At least this time I don't have to actually see him because I get in after day shift leaves for the night.

Some Incels #fundie #sexist reddit.com

Tfw when you tell your aged mother how you regret that you'll never have a child and continue the family name but she smiles and says your brothers already have so don't worry. Ldar fren.

image

(ZakariyahTruthSeeker)

That's the good thing about having a sibling though isn't it?

Their will be less pressure on you if one of your siblings does well academically or sexually.

Compare this to being the only child where all the pressure is on you. JFL

Only-child too?

My mum resents me for not "trying hard enough", but then bluepills me that "my time will come". Yep, those two thoughts in the same head.

Nah have 2 sisters but they're not old enough to impress my family yet.

I'm a failure academically, socially. You know the drill

I just hope one of my sister's goes off to do something or turn out decent so my parents don't feel like complete failures.

(neubs)

I'm an only child and sole heir to a 5 generation family farm. Pretty wild to think I could possibly end something like that over a simple thing like not being able to get laid.

(AutismShrieks)

My mom said the same. You can be a good uncle she said. This is when you know its over

Volcel if you're not coolunclemaxxing

Volcel if you aren't molesting your nieces

(Peruvian_Delta)

I’m, an only Child and I can’t bear the thought of the day I’ll have to explain to my mother that I will never give her that grandchild she wants and that her bloodline is cursed to die with me.

I’m sorry mother... I was a failure since the very start.

Don't feel too bad, it's her fault for giving you your genes.

(Connector-)

I’m not an only child, unluckily for me I do not have a brother but a sister. I highly dislike her, and in the end I have all the pressure on me because I am the only male descendant.

(Differential_Equador)

One can only assume that this is why certain families have a plethora of kids.

I'm sure social scientists (the ones who actually conduct pivotal research) and biologists realized that at least one child birthed from two average parents would be a genetic failure of some sort, ultimately leading to an inability to find a compatible mate.

If an offspring can't have kids, no biggie. Just have a couple more to ensure the continuance of your bloodline.

TFW both siblings are failures and you're expected to carry on the family legacy as an incel. FML.

(Meiji-Tenno)

tfw last hope for widowed mother to ascend and have at least ONE grandkid after my brother and sister couldn't make it JFL

How did your sister not make it?

(AccomplishedPotato6)

Women don't care about their sons. They actively sabotage their son's futures and shield them from everything that they need to be prepared for real life as an adult. They view their children as being pets with no human agency. That's why the sons of single mothers so often turn out to be either street thugs or hikkikomori. The unique trials and suffering endemic to life as an adult male in this world mean nothing to the mothers of those who face them. That's why your mother seems both confused and indifferent and quickly changes the subject when you describe inceldom to her; she's literally not capable of giving a shit. You're nothing more than a dog whining to be let outside to her. She never once cared about your future, whether you were accepted by society or not, your ability to lead a fulfilling life without being deprived of the satisfaction of basic needs, or anything of the sort. You're just a cute animal that is fine so long as it isn't literally dying. The reason why your mom would be perfectly fine with you moving back home with her rent-free is that your status as a functional adult doesn't mean anything to her at all, just as your success in relationships means nothing to her.

We're used to swallowing hard-to-swallow pills here, but one that isn't passed around nearly enough here is the mompill, that is, the fact that your mother never cared about you, ESPECIALLY if it always seemed as though she did.

Rick1 #racist kentucky.com

If posting the 10 commandments upset so many and they must be removed because they are in public places, then let me tell you what pissed me off and I'm tired of having it rammed down my throat and that is Spanish!!!

Every Courthouse in America must post all signs in English and Spanish...why, this is an English speaking country and if you are so pissed about the 10 Commandments being in public places, why aren't you screaming for the removal of all the Spanish signs??...that is being shoved down your throats alot more than the commandments.

At every ATM, you must push a button for English, yet no one complains..but show the 10 commandments and all hell breaks lose..

If the beliefs that this country was founded on upset you so much, then why are you here??

Have the Spanish signs removed and then you can remove the 10 commandments but not until..

Lord Jim #racist stormfront.org

Negroes had ample opportunities to earn that respect, and squandered them all with their innate feral and feckless behavior.

Whites are descendants of Europeans who had created a majestic civilization. Negroes are tribal people with no written language and virtually no intellectual achievements. Acting on a policy that was not fair to either group, the government released newly freed Negros into a white society that saw them as inferiors.

Decade after decade the problems persisted but the social justice warriors never gave up. They insisted that if they could find the right formula cohabitation would work, and concocted program after program to get the result they wanted. They created the Freedman’s Bureau, passed civil rights laws, tried to build the Great Society, declared War on Poverty, ordered race preferences, built housing projects, and tried midnight basketball.

Their new laws intruded into people’s lives in ways that would have been otherwise unthinkable. They called in National Guard troops to enforce school integration. They outlawed freedom of association. Over the protests of parents, they put Caucasian children on buses and sent them to Negro schools and vice versa. They tried with money, special programs, relaxed standards, and endless handwringing to close the “achievement gap.” To keep Caucasian backlash in check they began punishing public and even private statements on race. They hung up Orwellian public banners that commanded Caucasians to “Celebrate Diversity!” and “Say No to Racism.” Nothing was off limits if it might salvage the idea that Negros and Caucasians are equal on all levels.

Through the years, too many Negros continue to show an inability to function and prosper in a culture unsuited to them. Detroit is bankrupt, the south side of Chicago is a war zone, and the vast majority of black cities all over America are beset by degeneracy and violence. And Negros never take responsibility for their failures. Instead, they lash out in anger and resentment.

Across the generations and across the country, as we have seen in Detroit, Watts, Newark, Los Angeles, Cincinnati, and now Ferguson, rioting and looting are just one racial incident away. We are told we just have to try harder. More money, time, understanding, programs, and/or more opportunities are needed.

But nothing changes no matter how much money is spent, no matter how many laws are passed, no matter how many Negro geniuses are portrayed on TV, and no matter who is president. Some argue it’s a problem of “culture,” as if culture creates people’s behavior instead of the other way around. Others blame “white privilege.”

BUT, when America threw open the flood gates to the Third World, immigrants from Asia and India–people who are not Caucasian, not rich, and not “connected”–have quietly succeeded. While the children of these people are winning spelling bees and getting top scores on the SAT, Negro “youths” are committing half the country’s violent crime–crime, which includes viciously punching random Caucasians on the street for the thrill of it that has nothing to do with poverty.

After some 60 years of failure, squandering trillions of their tax dollars, Caucasians are exhausted with the failure to turn Negroes into productive people. They are exhausted by the social pathologies, the violence, the endless complaints, the bottomless pit of grievances regardless of the money given away, the excuses, and the reflexive animosity.

BlkPillPres #pedo #dunning-kruger incels.co

[Blackpill] [Hard To Swallow Edition] Incels Who Don't Want JB Females Ironically Likely Could Not Satisfy A "Mature" Woman

To all the incels who like to say these females look like "little boys" and you could never be attracted to a female like that, you want a "le real woman"

Really think about what you are saying and your circumstances, I'm an honest person, and I'm especially honest with myself, which is why I never really fall into copes/delusions about what I'm capable of and what I can achieve (this way of thinking seems to be the opposite for a lot of incels who don't really think things through)

I've always thought about the insult - "you can't handle a "real woman" X", and if I'm being honest, under the concept of what a "real woman" is when it comes to body type, I have to agree

I have barely 5 inches of penis, I can't do shit in the doggy style position to a woman with a big ass on that note. A larger woman of an older age group is more likely than not going to have a larger vaginal canal than a young petite teen girl, so I am less likely to physically satisfy such a woman, that's just common sense, an incel trying to aim for "huge stacked bitches" is seriously coping, you can't do shit for that bitch, even if she decides to fuck you, it would likely just end in mutual disappointment, you in your performance and her in your performance too JFL, it all falls on you

Most incels do not have the dick size nor physical strength to even properly fuck and man handle the kind of woman they proclaim to want, so when I hear an incel speak as if he only wants tall women with big breasts and ass, I think you are either a fakecel because you have the looks and physical capabilities to get and handle such a woman (make her want to stay), or you are coping hardcore because having these standards at least makes you "feel like a real man" and that's what counts to you

Responses to men who say they want JB just sounds like shaming tactics, a lot like something a woman would use - "Don't you want a "real woman" and not a little girl for a weak little men"

What happens if an incel is just honest with themselves:
"No, realistically I can't satisfy what you would call a "real woman" and nor would she want me, whilst a JB I could very easily satisfy, what next, what should I do, the ball is in your court?"

A lot of incels seem to cope with having the sexual attraction of "a real man" because that's all they really have since they'll never get such a woman. Ironically though they could never physically satisfy such a woman and more likely could satisfy a woman they consider "undeveloped"

They literally would reject the only kind of woman that they could satisfy and keep wanting them, but they prefer their attraction to a woman they could never satisfy and would never stay with them, because it "makes them feel like a man"

Incels would be more likely to "ascend" and keep a woman, if they targeted women who have a body type that they would consider "undeveloped"

Todd Strandberg #fundie raptureready.com

I'm very keen to read ever-negative email sent to Rapture Ready. Reading all the letters that disagree with the site helps me better understand why people have trouble with the end-time message. I use this information to help me refine the advice we offer to the public.

At the heart of many emails is content I identify as the "Sucker's Bet." These people view us "Doomsday Christians" as wasting our lives by endlessly waiting for a Lord who is never coming. They base their view on the idea that Jesus hasn't come in 2000 years, so this complete lack of activity should prove that He is not coming at all.

Some of these people bet they will have the satisfaction of watching me squander my life on a meaningless quest. But I'm not sure where they see the payoff. If I outlive them, there is no payoff. The only wager I see is their hope that Jesus doesn't come back and bring their carefree existence to a premature end.

[...]

When I respond to people, I reply to the real issue they are secretly addressing. People normally write me because they are bothered by events that confirm Bible prophecy. I point out to them that prophetic fulfillment is the real reason they're mad at me, and I warn them by saying, "If my luck with the end-time signs doesn’t run out soon, yours will.

TheGreatAndPowerfulOz #fundie imdb.com

I find it hilarious the number of people on this INTERNET MESSAGE BOARD that consider themselves highly intellectual. For instance, they quote other people's theories like it's their own personal religion, and they throw Latin phrases around like they're going out of style (They are, by the way. Take note.)
I actually had someone on here tell me that evolution was the correct theory and that "a theory is something that is generally regarded as fact". Oh really? Because creationism and evolutionism are both THEORIES. Both Christian and evolutionist tools are warring on a stupid web site about something that only affects them after they die. (It actually affects Christians in the present, but we'll let the atheists think it's all "equal", because they all want equal rights for everyone anyway.) Live your life, believe what you want to, but I'm going to cover all bases by believing in Christianity. If I get up to heaven and Allah is up there waving a stick, well I better hope he's merciful or else I'm SOL. But I might as well believe in something just so I can cover all bases.
If there isn't a God (there is), then it doesn't really matter what I believe. The fact that atheists have no comprehension of an afterlife (and the fact that the absence of such doesn't disturb them) is proof that they waste the time they have on Earth by squandering it looking to prove evolution is real.
Get off your self righteous f ucking high horse and let people believe what they want to. People on this board point to the Crusades as horrible because "religion killed so many people", but so did Hitler. So did Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold. So did Nero.
The point to all of this is, I see a lot of the same people proving/disproving (whatever you want to believe) their various theories, but really it doesn't do anyone any good to argue about such things. Christianity is more progressive than atheism because we don't want to/have to prove jack. We BELIEVE. That's all that is necessary. Meanwhile, everyone else comes up with pointless information. Well, have fun, because I'd rather sit in church than in front of a microscope with some 80 pound atheist that needs 300 SPF.

Jeff M #fundie answers.yahoo.com

(question was: It is okay to be gay?
caus im feeling these weird emotions atm.)

.Son, God says that type of behavior is an abomination to Him. Which means, don't go there. So, to answer your question properly, No, it is NOT okay to be gay. There is scientifically proven NO DNA for gay. But I can tell you what I have learned over the last year, There is an organization in England, that, if the person wants to, can be "cured" of homosexuality.They have been doing so for over 20 years. It has been determined by this group that the there is an actual cause for this behavior, and it's not natural. It is demonic "oppression". This is explained out in a book, titled; Healing through Deliverance, by Peter Horrobin, www.chosenbooks.org., Find a Bible based deliverance ministry, check with your local Bible book store, as they will know where, and who to contact. Hang in there! The devils' job on earth is to "steal, kill, and destroy". Be strong, get into The Word of God, read, study, and pray, DAILY!! Seek help, and be set free!
4 minutes ago

Broadband Slayer #fundie sluthate.com

[JB is short for Jailbait, as in Adolescents]

why is other peopel`s atraction YOUR problem?

About 50 year`s ago, you guy`s here woulde be antigay`s. You woulde not want anyone to be in gay relacionships or have gay atraction. You woulde have felt that it somehow your business. Even if the gay sex and LTR`s were not rapes, you woulde still stick your nose in.

"i'm not atract to it so it shoulden`t be allowed"

Today, you guy`s are antiJBlover. As another tread of this forum said this week, no body here meets with JB or even talk with them. It is stricly an atraction that not manifest into real life. But why so many here care if X user is atract to JB? Why is his atraction your business if he's not raping JB or grooming JB? JBlovers should be gassed for thier thoughts and feelings? Strong minority report.

Why is someone`s atraction your problem if thier atraction never manifest itself out side their brain?

Bob Lonsberry #fundie boblonsberry.com

WE NEEDED FAITH, NOT POLITICS

If you're the donut man, sell donuts.

And if you're the pope, preach Christ.

In life, you have to know your role and remember your purpose. You have to keep your eye on the prize. Yesterday, in front of a Congress and a nation, Pope Francis forgot who he was.

He came to the plate, and he didn't swing.

He failed to deliver the one message his life is supposedly dedicated to delivering. With the eyes of a government and a people upon him, he squandered the opportunity of a lifetime.

America needed to hear something, and he didn't say it.

If you're the pope, you preach Christ. You spread the good news of a Savior sent to redeem mankind. You call the world to Christ, you call the world to repentance, you call the world to its knees.

You tell all who will hear, the most important thing they or anyone else will ever hear – that God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believes on him should not perish, but have eternal life.

You follow the example of the Apostle Paul who went among the Corinthians with one topic on his lips – “Jesus Christ, and him crucified.”

You stand before the Americans, like that same Paul stood before the Athenians, and say, “Whom therefore ye ignorantly worship, him declare I unto you.”

But that's not what Francis did.

I'm not sure he even mentioned God or Jesus.

Instead, he talked about immigration and global warming and social justice. He gave a halting, barely comprehensible lecture ripped right out of the progressives' talking points. He said nothing new, noble or memorable.

And he certainly didn't preach Christ. He said not a word that called anyone to God, or gave them an insight into salvation or the eternities.

He did nothing to save a soul.

loudlytransparenttrash #fundie loudlytransparenttrash.tumblr.com

10 Leftist Myths That Shouldn’t Be Repeated


1. WE ARE A NATION OF IMMIGRANTS

No, we’re not. We’re a nation of citizens. This country was built on legal immigration, and the ones who made it through learned the language and assimilated. Many didn’t get in. Today’s scenario is 15 million illegals ridiculing those who played by the rules. Legal immigrants wait 15 years to get green cards and many bring a ton of jobs with them. The Statue of Liberty doesn’t say “Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, and all their relatives.” Learn the difference between legal and illegal.

Oh, and don’t give me that old “They’re doing jobs Americans won’t do” line. They’re doing jobs Americans won’t do - for that price. In Canada, there are no Mexicans and the landscaping still gets done. They use teenagers.

2. THIS COUNTRY WAS BUILT ON SLAVERY

This old trope. A few rich Southerners had slaves. Then there was a civil war and America’s bank account dropped to zero. After that the country was rebuilt from scratch without slavery. As Pat Buchanan put it, we didn’t start slavery. We ended it.

3. WE STOLE THE COUNTRY FROM PEACEFUL INDIANS

We fought them for 400 years. They fought against us, alongside us, and behind us. Fighting for land has always been part of the human race, long before we landed here. Asia, Africa, Europe, we’ve all done it but only one country is told to feel guilty for it. Today we would call this “stealing”. But for a long time, this was considered acceptable behaviour.

Before we got here the Indians were fighting each other, and yes, it was savage. War Before Civilization: The Myth of the Peaceful Savage describes horrific mass graves from way before we got here. Indians used to shoot arrows into their victims for hours after the guy died so he’d be stuffed in the afterlife. Oh and the smallpox blankets is a myth.

4. AMERICA IS RACIST

Studies show that white people are actually the least racist group. Getting rid of all the racists would mean America would be almost all white. Therefore, fighting racism is racist.

5. BLACK YOUTH ARE TARGETED BY WHITE MEN

Fact time. Black youth are in danger but it’s not white men killing them. Over 1,400 more black Americans murdered other blacks between 2010-2011 than were lynched from 1882 to 1968. Despite making up just 13% of the population, blacks committed half of homicides in the United States for nearly 30 years. In 2012, black people - at just a fifth of the size - committed almost 1,000 more murders than their white counterparts. It would take cops 40 years to kill as many black men as have died at the hands of others black men in 2012 alone. Black and Hispanic police officers are more likely to fire a gun at blacks than white officers. Blacks are 18.5 times more likely to kill cops than be killed by cops. Let’s not forget the black on white rape.

6. PRO-LIFERS ARE SEXIST

Most women are pro-life. To ignore their rights while touting abortion is sexist. Also, gender-based abortion is becoming more popular. We’ve seen how that goes for women in China. It ain’t pretty. So stop using abortion rights as some kind of proof there’s a war on women when the opposite is true.

7. WE NEED FREE HEALTH CARE

Not so fast. Have you seen the way this administration handles money? We’re 17 trillion in the hole. That’s a lot. Seventeen trillion seconds ago we were cavemen trying to figure out fire. This country is rife with severe obesity and millions upon millions of illegals. We don’t have the cohesion and health that other free health care countries have, so this perfectly reasonable idea is actually impossible until we sort our shit out.

8. AMERICA IS GETTING WORSE

The air has never been cleaner. We’ve never lived longer. Crime is at an all-time low. By virtually every possible metric, life has never been better. Traveling, eating, sex, fighting - all safer than ever. The list goes on and on. I saw a homeless man today checking his iPhone while he asked for change. If you think things were so much better back then or in another country, get in either a time machine or plane and go there and let’s see how long you survive.

9. DIVERSITY IS OUR STRENGTH

When it comes to restaurants this is true, and that is why people always use restaurants to prove it. By any other standard, it tends to go pretty badly. We should be encouraging everyone to err towards the same values. Assimilation leads to a sense of fraternity and that means a cohesive society. Why do you think Japan is so successful and get along so well? They are packed in there like sardines but they don’t mind because they’re all the same. When integration is discouraged you get Balkanization.

10. WE’RE ALL EQUAL

You realize the children of geniuses tend to be smarter than the children of stupid people, yeah? This is why they ask sperm donors questions. That’s what happens when idealists have to practice what they preach. They scoff at eugenics until it’s time to make a baby. They love the gay lifestyle until their son brings home a tranny. They love diversity until it’s time to choose a place to live or a school for their children. They pretend we’re all equal but they insist the government enforce this because they secretly know it isn’t true and in fact see themselves as superior to everyone else. They’re free to think that, but before going on a rant about it, maybe they should look up some basic facts first.

redbloodedamerica #fundie redbloodedamerica.tumblr.com

[The holocaust was legal, slavery was legal, segregation was legal. If you use the state as a metric for ethics you'll end up disappointed" It sounds to me like you're taking the side of the police state. Seriously how can you say that he was alive in that video. How can you be blind to the fact that the police killed a man in cold blood that day? When was the last time you looked at a black man? Did he have his eyes rolled back in his head? Was he lying on the ground, motionless and loosing body heat? What’s more is I don’t understand why you’re defending them. Aren’t Libertarians supposed to be against the police state? “Paying taxes under the threat of the gun”??? There are surveillance vans going around scrambling cellphone signals and intercepting calls in american streets because of these protests, Big Brother style. There are Nazis and KKK flocking to Ferguson. There’s more fucking nazis in america than there are in Germany for Christ sake. This is the america you support.]

I’m not going to keep repeating the facts to you about Eric Garner. You cannot judge whether he was alive or not by watching a video. I’m sorry. I’m also not going to entertain the ludicrous notion that there are more Nazis in America today compared to Nazis Germany or more KKK today than half a century ago. That’s simply not true.

Not to get into the actual accuracy of whether the holocaust was actually “legal” or not; you cannot base the state as a metric for ethics, but you must obey and enforce the laws whether they are ethical or not in a democratic republic. I believe the individual mandate in the Affordable Care Act is the most unethical law created since the Black Codes, yet I must abide by this law either way.

There is no police state in the United States either. People that say that have no idea what a real police state looks like. What we have are laws created and enforced by politicians that are democratically elected. These laws are not arbitrary and therefore must be carried out as written.

I’m not sure if you are a liberal or what, but this is precisely why libertarians are against more laws and more government intervention into our lives. If you are the type of individual that keeps voting in statist politicians like Michael Bloomberg, Bill de Blasio, Barack Obama, etc who encourage creating more laws, more bureaucracy, more illegal executive orders, more government programs, and more taxes, you are creating your own problems. These are the unethical characters that are creating these laws you disagree with. The police are merely enforcing them.

Eric Garner was a victim of a bad law. He chose to break the law and therefore broke his social contract in this civil society. He ended up paying the ultimate price by resisting arrest. That was his choice though. You cannot beg for all this big government intervention and then choose not to obey the ones you personally do not agree with. That’s not how a society works. You cannot have your cake and eat it too. You can have liberty or you can have big controlling government. Which will it be?

The majority of the people of New York City chose Bloomberg to represent their wishes in government and in doing so must accept his terrible nanny state laws. If you want to fix the system, you must keep these liberal politicians out of office and start putting more libertarian or conservative ones in that want to repeal or end big government programs. Otherwise, you’re just going to keep perpetuating this system of your own oppression

BabyFuck McGirlsex #sexist incels.co

[Based] Incels.co is not the biggest source of Blackpills : Real Life Is

Incel tears claims that incels.co is what is fuelling the Blackpilled mindset and without .co we would all become bluepilled

I was offline (due to a technical fault in my neighbourhood ) for a week with 100% no internet and i saw many more Vicious and brutal Blackpills in real life than those i've seen on .co

Becky lites shameless talking about how they hate ugly guys (sub8)

Whilst churchmaxxing i overhead some JB foidlets complaining how strict their trad parents were and how their parents were severely restricting their movements effectively preventing them from sucking chads cock and riding the carousel

The blackpill is unassailable, self evident and irrefutable boyos - if all incel communities are shut down today - the blackpill will still remain, the blackpill is immortal

The only reason the blackpill exists is because it simply comes from our real life experiences.

Astrophysicist IQ

JFL i heard something similar a while ago
A foid was complaining that she wasn't able to date her white bf because her asian parents might not approve of it

Foids what to start sucking chads cock as early as possible ngl.
Imagine how tough (and cucked) it is to raise a daughter

Unnamed armed burglars in Livry Gargan #racist jta.org

(JTA) — A French Jewish leader and his family were assaulted in their home near Paris in what representatives of French Jewry said was an anti-Semitic attack.

In the attack Thursday night, three men, two of whom were wearing masks, broke into the home of Roger Pinto, the president of Siona, a group that represents Sephardic Jews. The attackers beat Pinto’s son and wife in the home in the northeastern suburb of Livry Gargan, the Dreuz news website reported Sunday.

One of the attackers said: “You Jews have money,” according to the family members.

The family members told police that the attackers, who they said were black men in their 20s or 30s, took their credit cards and jewelry, interrogated them for hours about additional items them could steal and threatened to kill them. The men ran away after Roger Pinto managed to discretely call rescue services on a mobile phone.

The Pintos were taken to hospital for treatment. They suffered some minor injuries and were deeply traumatized, the report said.

The incident, one of several cases in France in recent years in which criminals apparently singled out Jews based on the belief that they have money, provoked passionate condemnations from the CRIF umbrella group of French Jewish communities and the National Bureau of Vigilance Against Anti-Semitism. Both groups said the incident was an anti-Semitic attack.

[...]

In 2014, three men broke into the home of a Jewish family in Creteil near Paris. One of them raped a young woman there while another guarded her boyfriend, whom they took prisoner. A third took the couple’s credit card to extract cash from an ATM machine. They too allegedly said they targeted the couple because they are Jewish.

Vox Day #fundie rightwingwatch.org

After spending weeks hyping a new comic book series promising to spark outrage among progressive comic book fans, alt-right activist Theodore Beale—known online as Vox Day—has delivered: A trailer for the “Alt-Hero” comic book series has been released.

Beale managed to raise more than $32,000 overnight after releasing the trailer, meeting what he said was his first fundraising goal toward the creation of the comic series. The fundraising page claims the comic is “intended to challenge and eventually replace the SJW-converged comics of DC and Marvel.” (“SJW” is Alt-Right shorthand for “social justice warrior.”)

Beale told his fans that major comic makers are “methodically, purposefully, absolutely attempting to destroy every value—every American value, every Western value, every Christian value that they can get their hands on” by creating spinoffs of popular comic series that depict classic characters as black, female and Muslim. Beale’s answer to that perceived attack is to fund the creation of a comic series that features “triggering” white characters that smoke cigarettes, wear Confederate flag costumes and combat left-wing protesters.

The trailer, which was debuted yesterday, features a character that is “doing the job the police don’t want to” and “cleaning up the streets one illegal at a time.” The series promises “storylines, not social justice” and revolves around a collection of superhuman heroes that defy a United Nations “Superhuman Protection Council” and act as vigilante crime fighters who apparently use their rogue status to target undocumented immigrants and left-wing protesters.

As Beale describes it:

"What I found the most interesting was the idea that anything short of an undefined “success”, which as we all know will be redefined and re-redefined as Alt??Hero meets with the usual metrics of success over time, is tantamount to “sad humilation”. Think about how twisted one’s psyche has to be to make that connection, and what a crushing fear of failure one would have to have in order to think that way.

That is the heart of the SJW, which is not only terrified of failure, but is terrified that someone, somewhere, will be successful doing something of which the SJW does not approve.

Of course, SJWs have good reason to be terrified of Alt??Hero. Because they know they are the true villains and the enemy in the cultural war."

Mark Chambers #homophobia #psycho joemygod.com

Carbon Hill mayor Mark Chambers has responded about recent controversial comments he made in a Facebook post. The post written in all capital letters said: “We live in a society where homosexuals lecture us on morals, transvestites lecture us on human biology, baby killers lecture us on human rights and socialists lecture us on economics.”

Chambers faced strong criticism from his constituents for the post and also for a response to his Facebook friend who wrote: “By giving the minority more rights than the majority. I hate to think of the country my grandkids will live in unless somehow we change and I think that will take a revolution.”

Chambers responded to that comment saying: “The only way to change it would be to kill the problem out. I know it’s bad to say but without killing them out there’s no way to fix it.”

Hanakai #fundie feministcurrent.com

Women who say they chose prostitution and crow about it and the alleged wonderfulness of the choice to let men rent her vagina and pay for use of her bodily orifices are traitors to their sex, traitors to women.

By misdescribing prostitution as a choice, myths about prostitution are perpetuated: the myth that prostitution is empowering for women and necessary for men; that it is the oldest profession (Fact: Prostitution is not a profession, nor is it the oldest occupation); that it is beneficial for women and a fine normal way to make a living; that women are happy hookers; that all women are basically prostitutes who will exchange sex for material reward; the myth that prostitution causes no harm and the myth that prostitution can exist without contributing to sexism, misogyny and the oppression of women.

Everywhere on this planet, the majority of prostituted women are overwhelmingly suffering from poverty, a fact about which there is no disagreement. Urgent financial need is the most frequent reason mentioned by prostituted women for being in the sex trade. No one chooses to be poor when given other options. In countries where prostituted women have been studied in depth, sexual abuse in childhood prior to entry into prostitution is a significant precondition for entry into the sex trade. One rarely meets women in prostitution who were not sexually or physically abused beforehand. No one chooses to be abused.

In any sane, decent, just world where women were valued as full human beings, there would be no prostitution. It should not exist. Sex and women would not be commodities to be bought and sold and rented by any man with sufficient coin of the realm. Sex is the dynamic that creates life. Nature did not intend sex as a commercial transaction. In humans, sex is elevating to the body and being when it is an ecstatic bonding with real connection, caring and affection between partners who are seeking to give and receive pleasure and bring each other higher. In prostitution, sex coarsens the energy and erodes the ability to love. Those who know how to read the human energetic field can attest to this.

The reality that no woman in her right mind would choose to engage in an activity where she will be dead at age 34 (yes, that is the average lifespan for prostituted women), where she has a 90% chance of being raped on the job, where men will spit on her, ejaculate on her face, jam their dicks up her anus and claim the right to ATM (ass-to-mouth, meaning the trick sticks his dick up her anus, withdraws it and sticks it immediately in her mouth without cleaning off the feces), where she has a large chance of being beaten and brutalized, where she is the most vulnerable and likely victim of a serial killer. Who would chose that for themselves? For her sister? For her daughter? For her mother?

brucewhain #racist realjewnews.com

Yes, international banking is a Jewish conspiracy. But how much longer would it have taken to get to this point if not?

The more money there is, the sooner governments will be able to pass it out, and bring a permanent high standard of living.

(As a 60-yr-old Holocaust denier of German descent who has had his livelihood completely stolen by Jews and their ignorant pompous minions - and it had nothing to do with Holocaust denial - you can be sure I’m totally anti-Semitic.

“Though I recognize something intimately familiar for instance in the voice of David Cole, and we know Brother Nathanael is certainly more Jewish than the current pope is Catholic - bad example - but both great forces fighting what is wrong in the world.)

Ron Paul’s proposed law to monitor the Fed - if you look at the existing affected laws - amounted to exactly nothing. No change. And Paul’s ranting to end the Fed (though I would have voted for him) if carried out according to his plan, would have had disastrous consequences, not unlike many Jewish subversive takeovers, where people end up starving amidst the Jews’ violent suppression.

It was a publicity stunt - that got him more votes and approval than any other of his proposed policies. Because it brought to the fore that the Fed is a conspiracy and dishonestly highjacks public funds.

But the actions are not the big danger posed by Jewish conspiratorial influence. They have an incentive to make the monetary system work and bring prosperity - if they don’t, they lose.

So though all currencies in the Western world are carefully manipulated and kept within reasonable trading ranges by manipulation of the big banks - who of course communicate with each other and in this way have created for themselves a giant, perpetual and nearly limitless ATM machine - the alternative to this manipulation is economic disaster.

It’s the only moral thing to do!

I know most will agree that the Jews have turned the western monetary system(s) into a perpetual money-making machine faster that any other group would have been able to do it. So we stand to benefit, esp. as (God willing) openness on the internet, at least in the US, continues to be a reality - so when big thieving improprieties occur there is at least a possibility for jail time.

We are following Japan - a mature economy - into the unknown. Before cooperation from the Fed, Japan tried again and again to manipulate their currency to bring changes necessary for prosperity, to no avail.

Now with the (illegal) manipulation moving ahead and bringing stable exchange rates in the established economies it’s only a matter of tweaking to get it right - though China, with it’s overwhelming possession intrinsic valuables, may pose problems of integration versus our nebulous currencies. But gold is certainly not the only legitimate gauge if intrinsic value!

There’s food, oil, and importantly, real estate.

The place where the Jewish conspiracy is most dangerous and destructive is not in making money, but in their persistence in trying to take over the world through use of this partially ill gotten money.

Their actions reveal a kind of stupidity - a lack of creativity - They don’t know what to do with the money - or the power it gives them. But nevertheless they push everything and everyone aside with Talmudic zeal in order the carry out their idiotic, destructive conspiracies.

So dummy with lots of bucks decides - Oh, we’re going to take over Ukraine for a tiny Jewish clique of proven assholes. (Well you’ll agree it’s proven now at least.) We’ll have power! We’ve placed enough Jews in the state department and been channeling enough funds to Marxist-like violent political agitation that we will be able to “rule”.

(I hate the word: Jews constantly use it because they are so obsessed with this kind of thing - it is a defect in God’s workmanship.)

These people have been warned over and over - the repeated outcomes of genocide are staring them in the face - BUT YET THEY PERSIST.

They need permanent restraint, through use of physical restraint - pain if necessary - or it’s psychical equivalent.

turtle #fundie rr-bb.com

Question.
Have any of you ever had a young son or daughter or mabye grandkid defend homosexuality.
and at the same time sort of look down on you like your unenlightened.

The reason I ask is because i have a friend who's daughter has a friend with 2 mommies.
And a conversation about that one time.an adult Christian was saying it's wrong because the bible says it's wrong.
And the 11 year old girl basically rebuked the adult and Defended Homosexuality in a very haughty way that just Floored me.
I mean this little kid actually believing that she has the high moral ground by standing for homosexuality is madness to me.

Rollo Tomassi #sexist google.no

When I wrote Navigating the SMP, the reason I used 30 as the general age women typically hit the ‘Wall’ is really a combination of factors. Most importantly it represents the threshold at which most women realize their lessened capacity to sexually compete with the next generation of women in their ‘actualized’ sexual peak (22-24). However, there is a male part of the Wall equation that needs to be understood. 30 is also the general age at which men (should) become aware of their own, longer-lasting sexual market value and potential. This affects women’s interpretations of the Wall. Once a Man is aware that he has the capacity to attract the sexual attentions of the younger women he’d previously had limited access and understanding of, his actions and imperatives define the Wall for women who are approaching that threshold. And unsurprisingly this is the point at which Wall-fearing women begin their accusations of men’s infantile ego issues, shaming, etc. for preferring younger women than themselves.

Okonkwo Akachukwu #racist amren.com

A Nigerian’s View of Race

Whites have become lambs, practically begging for slaughter.

When a certain leader of a certain country refers to other countries, such as Nigeria, as s**tholes, that is not the least bit racist. It is, unfortunately, merely descriptive.

The fences at the school were routinely broken so that students could bring prostitutes onto the premises for a short session. It was not at all uncommon for a young student to be attending to the call of nature at night in the overgrown grass while another would be engaging a local woman only a few yards away.

Boarding students, particularly the more vulnerable junior students, often went without food or drinking water. These basic necessities should have been covered by our school fees but the funds were almost always misappropriated by school staff. Underfeeding was so widespread that my friends and I might go for two weeks without defecating. Drinking water was sometimes so scarce that we might padlock a pail of water in a locker, only to find the lock broken by morning.

Sexual molestation of the younger students was a matter of course. The only way to avoid that was to avoid sleeping in hostels. Some of my fondest childhood memories are of sleeping on the rooftops of classroom buildings to avoid predation, swatting at mosquitoes and watching the stars and discussing the nature of the universe with close friends. I was a natural storyteller, and my friends also enjoyed these evenings.

Electricity was a problem in the hostels, so it was impossible to read at night. I used to climb the fence—not to steal or to chase whores—but to find a functioning street light. I recall finishing Stephen King’s Shawshank Redemption under a street light very close to the huge glass building known as Church Gate.

King’s College is considered an elite institution in Nigeria.

If any major British government official were to ever ask me if my people are glad the British are gone, my response would be simple. “No, we are not. Come back. Please.” There is a kind of adulation of the British that is on display when a Nigerian goes to Britain for the first time—even if only for one week—and comes back with an affected British accent.

On the other hand—and I freely acknowledge this is a stark contradiction—virtually all Nigerians and Africans believe that Africa’s poverty and instability are due to European exploitation. If it weren’t for ndi onyi o cha (Igbo for “those white skins”)! I have never understood this line of reasoning. If Africa was worth plundering, why are Africans unable to plunder Africa’s resources to build their own advanced civilizations?

This African tendency to blame others for our own shortcomings is a perfectly natural, if unhealthy, coping mechanism. One cannot live year in year out in squalor, social stagnation, and rampant crime and simply accept that this is perhaps the best level at which one’s people can operate. It is far easier and all too human to push the blame elsewhere.

Another purpose for the demonization of whites by Africans is to serve as a moral justification for plundering and exploiting whites. I need not outline the very many tactics of plunder. Green-card fraudulent marriages are a common example. For years, my own family has been struggling in vain to get me to “follow tradition” by marrying an akata (Igbo slang for African-Americans) in order to get “papers.” Of course, the anchor-baby phenomenon is exploitation, as is mass migration to Europe.

A few years ago, a Nigerian friend remarked that he had survived for years in the US by never paying for groceries. Whenever he was approached by a store attendant as he wheeled his cart towards the exit, he would simply yell aggressively in our native tongue, never once pausing for breath as he made for the exit.

White guilt makes white people easy to plunder. It is why white professors everywhere give black students preferential treatment that amounts to unjust discrimination against the rest of the class.

There is something unusual about the psychological makeup of white people. It can be metaphorically described as an inner compass. Due to that inner compass, white people need very little external force or punishment. They do not need much policing, so people can apply their potential to useful activities rather than wasting time donning a uniform and swinging a night-stick.

The absence of this inner compass is why, in Nigeria, no number of police officers can enforce traffic laws at an intersection. Indeed, most traffic enforcers and police officers routinely break the laws they are supposed to uphold (and still insist on taking a bribe at every random stop).

While this inner compass has tremendous advantages for white society, one disadvantage is that members of that inwardly guided culture are prone to tremendous torments of conscience that make them vulnerable to manipulation. There seems to be a miasma of guilt inherent to the very fabric of Western culture, a feeling of inadequacy for failing to measure up to one’s internal yardstick.

Although slavery was a universal phenomenon that preceded the US, no black, Arab or Asian man ever seems to experience racial guilt because of it.

I have no idea just how far down the rabbit hole of insanity this suicidal phenomenon of white guilt will go. One thing I do know is that most cultures, especially Eastern ones, suffer little to none of the white man’s inner conundrums and have zero patience for the social shakedowns and inefficiency of black culture.

The blunt truth is, as far as blacks are concerned, whites have become lambs, practically begging for slaughter in a world filled with lean wolves. We blacks have grown accustomed, even dependent, on the easy milk of guilty teats. What will happen to us when a less masochistic civilization replaces whites?

The future I see for Africa is as an economic outpost or colony of China. We Africans possess no human capital, in an age that requires the economic leveraging of human capital. The cars in our streets do not bear African names; they bear the names of Japanese, American, French, and Italian automotive innovators.

We have no major industry other than the natural resources beneath our feet, and our elites squander the revenues on luxury items from other civilizations. We are converting our only assets into rapidly depreciating foreign trinkets and distractions.

In the natural course of things, Africa’s resources will, once again, be exploited by a civilization—in this case Chinese—that is economically and technologically superior to ours. In the next 40 years, China’s influence will be immense, and the Chinese are not sympathetic, as whites are, towards the antics of Black Lives Matter.

I doubt that the reality of our plight will ever be universally accepted by Africans. I don’t think the average Nigerian realizes just how serious the problem is. We know, deep in our hearts, that our country is not working, but what is the solution? There are only so many African migrants other countries can accept. Our problem thus becomes a world problem.

hyeonmi #transphobia reddit.com

I, like many people my age grew up online, spending dozens of hours a week glued to my computer and phone. I spent a chunk of that time on twitter and tumblr, two TRA social justice strongholds since about 2012. And the TRA dogma has been so prevalent in my upbringing online that their terminology, gaslighting, malicious manipulation and just straight up lunacy is almost... normal to me.

I grew up hearing that lesbians need to unlearn their genital fetish or they’re bad people. I grew up hearing that “TERFs” are an evil subhuman sect of the population that deserves only the worst because their thoughts and words “literally kill trans women”.* I grew up being taught to never doubt that trans women are women and trans men are men, full stop. That I couldn’t even call them their correct sex because that would be literal violence. It’s horrifying that they have fostered an environment on these huge platforms (with many minors and impressionable young people) where there’s a constant threat of trans suicide, being ostracized by society and being considered a bad person if you don’t comply with the TRA ideology without criticism, without question and dissent? Dissent is not even an option for us. And... ugh. This was all on websites I used from age 13 til now, as a 21 year old. Surrounded by friends of the same age. Having our environment flooded with this fuckery, and our minds bent by malicious adult TRAs to submit to them accept these harmful lies.

I’m envious of older gender critical thinkers I’ve seen here on reddit who got to grow up normal, and not be exposed to all this and thus have an easier time smelling the bullshit and being critical.

After all though, I’m better off than some my peers. Despite being surrounded by it all I’ve always been more resistant and less into the TRA’s schtick. I never self described as cis, never put pronouns in my bios, never questioned my “gender identity”, hell I never thought much of it at all. Like I don’t even have one I’m just female. On the other hand though I have had many friends and knew tons of people who drank the TRA kool-aid, bottoms up with not a drop to spare. Every single one of them is suffering and mentally ill in some way, desperately in need of a positive life change and real help and coping skills, but what they got instead was all they knew. Fuck the trans cult.

*(It’s honestly jarring how much emphasis they have on hating feminists and lesbians but generally ignore misogynistic/oppressive men. And how there is no equivalent for the whole anti terf phenomenon for trans men. Reflecting on this was my peak trans moment.)

I could go more into it all but I’m tired atm. Sorry this is barely readable lol just wanted to get my thoughts out there and maybe others will feel the same and even if not, I’m interested to hear your opinion on what I’m thinking.

bsutansalt #sexist #crackpot reddit.com

[Repost] Women Do Not Have A “Sex Drive”

tl;dr Red Pill Theory focuses on inducing and maintaining female sexual attraction, but the applied theory (e.g. dread) is missing the underlying connective tissue - women have an attention drive, not a sex drive. If you want to maintain sexual attraction, learn to give the right type of attention (but not too much!).
________________

What Makes a Woman Feel "Sexual"?

Anyone who reads the sidebar understands that the Game is all about FEELINGS. How you make her FEEL is the key to unwrapping every other aspect of attraction.

"Feelings" are temporary emotional states. They are also overwhelming, meaning at sufficient levels they take priority over the rest of the cognitive processes.

Female sexuality is REACTIVE - it's not the dull aching horniness that men experience. It is rapid-onset response to desirable male attention.

The price of male attention is sex. Sex is the glue that holds male attraction firmly in place. 1

Ipso facto women are willing to pay the sex price and a natural feedback loop is created; male attention makes her "sexual", the sex engenders more attention from the male, the attention makes her FEEL "sexual", and so on.

They fuck because they want to FEEL sexual. Not because they want sex.

What Do Women THINK Makes Them Feel Sexual?

Who cares. Ask 10 of them once a day for a week and get 19182 different responses. Listen to their advice and get 0 sex.
________________

What Motivates Women vs. Men to Play This Game?

I don't buy the line that "women are natural Machiavellians/She's always planning the next branch swing/etc.".

Her goal is to maximally exploit her youth (in other words beauty) for maximal desirable male attention.

Can this take the form of a conniving woman, ready to trade up at the next possible chance? Sure. But that is a SYMPTOM and not a CAUSE.

Men want to fuck for fucking's sake. Some trade resources and their dignity for this (gradually rarer) privilege - we call them beta males. Others learn to exploit the desire for their attention. Be the latter guy.

Men's goal is sexual variety.
________________

The Breakdown - Why Women Leave

Ultimately, whether through fault of the man or woman, the cycle of attention stops.

Men who break the cycle generally stop giving the girl "sexy" attention. This can be the result of him becoming unattractive physically 2, but more often the man fails to make her FEEL seduced.

His attention shifts from "sexy" to "expecting" - this makes the girl FEEL...at best nothing, at worst like she is doing work. What used to be motivating attention has been replaced by a demand for service. Wrong kind of attention.

Cheating happens when some other guy steps in and gives her that seductive attention again, making her FEEL sexy. She might fuck him then, she might not. BUT the relationship enters Stage 4 Terminal Cancer at that point.

You may hear "I love you but I'm not IN LOVE with you" at this point 3. Scrap it and move on.
________________

Attention in Context of TRP Terms

Let's re-frame a few core concepts from applied (things you do) to theory (abstract thought that creates broader understanding).

* Dread is reminding a woman your "sexy" attention is always for sale, not overtly stating you will fuck other women

* The 3/2 rule is meant to stifle inappropriate outflows of your time and resources aka limitation creates mystery, it is not a math equation

* Pre-selection and social proof are when other women competing for YOUR attention increases its perceived value

I could go on - the point is the underpinning theme is provisioning and framing of attention.
________________

Conclusions

* Women do not have a sex drive - they respond sexually to desirable male attention

* Never rely on a woman to tell you what makes her FEEL sexual - especially not one you are fucking

* Males desire sexual variety, women desire maximal exploitation of their youth and beauty for attention

* Women cheat when they stop getting the sexy kind of attention - this PERMANENTLY prevents your attention from being "sexy" ever again
________________

Footnotes

Throughout the post there are footnotes of side observations. Each references a specific problem in the modern SMP. Here they are in order.

1. Men giving away attention for free in never before seen quantities - Remember how I said the price for male attention is sex? This dynamic is fucking that up - attention is available in mass quantity without the old cost.

2. There's a reason our advice starts at "lift" - there's no excuse to be physically unattractive - Don't lose the game because you didn't learn the basics. Keep it simple.

3. Reinvesting in a dying or dead relationship - Don't go looking in the dumpster. You'll only find trash. Roll around in there and that smell will be stuck on your for awhile.

G43 #fundie reddit.com

Yes, those are nice traits, but ultimately, they're trade-offs in exchange for respect. Asians tend to have nebbish personalities and smaller physical frames on average. It's not just 'america', asians historically closed off their civilizations for a reason, they can't compete normally in the free sexual market. As for Hispanics, they're not a race, obviously those who have a lighter parent that is already pred. white will have a better chance of passing, but typical hispanic mixes still look pretty mixed, and identify accordingly, and still don't get the same negative stereotypes that hapas do.

The stereotypes are based on how people act. So many arabs are terrorists o.k., and many asians are nerds, o.k. Because Asians themselves have pathetic predispositions in terms of the metrics I gave. Awkward social behavior, weak physical structure, etc. It has nothing to do with 'imperialism', mongol/turkic 'imperialists' did fine with other women, and their descendants still do to this day. Keep in mind that the Mongols also considered eliminating the Chinese for being weak.

How Not to Help Children

A mark's guide

David French #fundie patheos.com

It is past time to admit a very hard truth: America’s poverty problem is also a depravity problem[...]

For many, many years I spent time “in the trenches” reaching out to at-risk youth. At first I was the stereotypical naive idealist. ”All they need is love and a chance,” I thought. Working in mentoring programs, I spent untold hours playing catch, going to little league games, going to parks, and just hanging out with at-risk kids as part of a variety of programs. Seeing ragged clothes, I’d buy new clothes. Hearing that a mother couldn’t pay the light bill, I’d kick in and help. I spent night after night sleeping in homeless shelters, cooking dinners in the evening, pancake breakfasts in the morning, and fixing snack lunches for hard days on the streets.

I can’t remember when I first realized that I was accomplishing nothing of substance. A few car break-ins taught me that some guys saw me as an easy mark. A few pot purchases with the “gas bill money” taught me that others saw me as an ATM. Admonitions to “stay in school” had little appeal compared to drug-fueled orgies for kids as young as fifteen years old. I tried. God knows I tried. But it was all for naught.

Only one thing really worked. The Cross. There are kids today that Nancy and I worked with who are doing well, who are happily married, and who are pillars of their community. What made the difference for them? The Cross. It wasn’t about my words. It wasn’t about my effort. (After all, I tried just as hard or harder with other kids — who are now in prison or “baby-daddies” or both.) The kids who made it heard the Gospel, repented of sin, and were transformed through the renewing work of the Holy Spirit.

It’s trendy now for churches to put less emphasis on the Gospel and more emphasis on service. I’ve even heard Christians almost brag that their outreach efforts don’t include any proselytizing at all. This is tragic. Billions of dollars of “service” won’t change hearts and lives. We know that now. In fact, those very billions may very well numb the human heart to the gravity of its sin.

So, yes, let’s do “more,” but let’s make sure that “more” is aimed at the real source of American poverty — our depravity.