Similar posts

Slav_weebcel #sexist incels.co

[JFL] Russian TV makes a reportage on incels.Spoiler:its bullshit.

The part about incels starts at around 50:00.
I'm not going to translate everything,but I'm going to mention key points of this brainless circus..

1.They told a few times that incels don't have sex because they don't want to,not because they can't.

2.They said that incels is a movement that prepares future terrorists.

3.They said that incels prefer to kill people instead of having sex.(LOL)

4.They said that incels are hired by ultra rights and islamists on incel forums to kill people.

5.They said that INCELS killed 45 people (not persons who have the same issues or persons that proclaimed themselves as incels,they basically said that incels as a movement kills people)

6.They contacted an open incel,asked him to give an interview and told him that the interviewer will be a man.They lied to him and invited a pornostar that sat in front of him in underwear in a public place.This guys is probably a real incel based on his looks and his words about top 10/5% percent of the most attractive guys getting almost all the sex and he talked about him doing really well in the school and institute and still getting no pussy (pointing at the fact that intellect means nothing in SMV).The pornostar said that even thought she fucks tons of ugly guys (she didn't mention that she does it for money,ofc),nor she or any other women owes anything to men.She also told him that the problem is in himself,and with his ideology he wont be getting any sex from her.

7.In total,the only point they made was that incels are virgin terrorists.They didn't talk about how incels define themselves,reasons they become incels,what they want,what problems they face and want to address to society,how much they suffer,what solutions they propose and etc.Incels=terrorists=bad.

W. F. Price #sexist web.archive.org

Wednesday’s post about how people (and women in particular) are wasting time, often while pursuing futile goals, has brought up some discussion of the origins of feminism in recent comments. There’s something very cult-like about the way feminism has emerged as a mass movement, and this characteristic has given rise to a lot of speculation about who was responsible for really getting it off the ground. Some have suggested Communists and the Frankfurt School, and others Victorian politics. There are a lot of theories, but what’s undeniable is that it burst onto the world scene in a big way in the mid-20th century.

Before this, I suspect there had always been various proto-feminist movements of one sort or another. From fertility cults in the ancient world, which survive today in Asia and perhaps parts of Africa, to the proliferation of witchcraft in late medieval Europe and then the political feminism that emerged in early 19th century Britain in response to the French Revolution’s ideals of equality.

I think feminism in one form or another has always been with us, and has always been part of the human experience. Even male feminists have always existed. There have been certain men from time immemorial who, despising their fellow men, maintain a worshipful attitude toward the feminine. But it has never been much more than a nuisance, or perhaps at worst an underground criminal industry, as in the abortionists that were prosecuted in Europe following the population depletion that accompanied the plague.

One rather remarkable passage from Alonso de Salazar Frías, a Spanish inquisitor who recommended that witches not be executed because they were not actually doing much, but rather simply delusional, highlights some of the similarities between modern feminist wishful thinking and the claims of witches, which were fantastic accounts of being able to do pretty much anything:

The real question is: are we to believe that witchcraft occurred in a given situation simply because of what the witches claim? No: it is clear that the witches are not to be believed, and the judges should not pass sentence on anyone, unless the case can be proven with external and objective evidence sufficient to convince everyone who hears it. And who can accept the following: that a person can frequently fly through the air and travel a hundred leagues in an hour; that a woman can get through a space not big enough for a fly; that a person can make himself invisible; that he can be in a river or the open sea and not get wet; or that he can be in bed at the sabbath at the same time… and that a witch can turn herself into any shape she fancies, be it housefly or raven? Indeed, these claims go beyond all human reason and may even pass the limits permitted by the Devil.

So what is it that turned feminism from a mere annoyance into a widespread, powerful cult that is supported by none other than the President of the United States and other leaders throughout the West?

I suspect the answer has something to do with mass communication and mob psychology. In the past, feminism or other odd, associated cults would emerge in some region, but would remain contained therein. Because it isn’t a proper religion that moves men to fight and sacrifice themselves, it was never in any danger of sweeping into power on a broad scale. It seems to me to be no coincidence at all that the rise of feminism coincided with television, mass-marketing and consumerism, because when the quirks of female psychology could be manipulated and fostered for profit or power on a widespread scale, it suddenly became a force in its own right.

There’s a great documentary – actually, the best I’ve ever seen – that documents the rise of mass psychology and the various methods people use to manipulate it for power and or profit. I’m sure a number of readers have seen it, but it’s worth mentioning “The Century of the Self” again, because it goes into great detail about the communication and psychological trends that have shaped contemporary society. Evidently, Freud was a real pioneer in this area, although he himself didn’t put his ideas into practice; his nephew did.

various TERFs #fundie reddit.com

Re: Liberal feminists are so predictable I don't know whether to laugh or cry.

(blairbitchcraft)
This is literally what happened to me when I was younger - well, I recognized the whole trans thing didn’t make sense. “TERF” wasn’t a thing back then. I found more people that agreed with me and then I found a version of feminism that really resonated with me: radical feminism. But everyone hated them. So, I whistled while I walked away and didn’t look back for years.

Liberal feminism has gotten a lot more aggressive than it ever was. You used to be able to find people discussing it, discussing their honest feelings (“I don’t really FEEL like a woman; I just like looking like one,”), and people debating with respect.

It’s so weird.

(FriendlyCommie)
The irony is that the context of the aforementioned thread was I was talking about how anti-feminists claim to support intellectualism and being well-read when talking about how well read St. Jordan Peterson is, but dismiss any literature that contradicts their pre-established conclusions. Everyone in the generally progressive sub was agreeing with me, but once I mentioned rad fem literature everyone... immediately dismissed it, funnily enough.

Lib Fems pretty much forced me to become radical feminist. I remember I had a youtube channel where I used to just post very casual off the cuff videos and one time I made a video literally just saying, "Hey guys... maybe we should actually engage gender critical feminists in debates, rather than just calling them bigots and shutting them out."

The video got loads of thumbs down and some guy who had been I subscriber for ages commented saying I was literally responsible for transgender people committing suicide... just because I said we should actually talk to gender critical people.

By contrast every radical feminist community I've found so far has been incredibly accepting. This is actually one of the few places on the internet where I don't feel like I'm wrong one word away from a downvote avalanche.

Edit: how ironic that I mistyped the phrase "one wrong word"

(Kluannoa)
Yes indeed! And downvotes are one thing, but what I ''feared'' before I found radical feminism was just the abuse that you get if you say one word that's considered wrong. They made me feel like I was walking on egg shells, and that their ideology was suffocating and full of arbitrary rules, that also changed arbitrarily.

One thing that I did learn from that crowd, was the value of basic human respect. You don't make the world any better if you borderline bully someone for some honest, tiny infraction, you don't make the space more pleasant when well-meaning and sincere people get treated like witches because they used the word ''crazy'' or because they wrote ''transwoman'' instead of ''trans woman''.

These people have no respect as I see it; I think that there's something inherently disrespectful about bullying people into compliance, feeling entitled to be incredibly rude and hostile for ridiculous reasons, and always assuming the very worst about people you disagree with.

Thus, I rarely even participated in their discussions. They reminded me of my past abusers.

(afistfulofyen)
The ideologies are straight from The Abuser's Handbook. Same tactics couple with cult strategies to keep people ever guessing, ever trying, ever in line.

Good little libfems *pats heads* good little libfems, you're doing the Lord's mens' work and we appreciate most of all that you do not think for yourselves.

(justhysterical2018)
Yes! And, while they talk about inclusion, they fail to recognize that they are incredible elitists. If someone says something "wrong" (because god forbid they don't spend all their time reading woke thinkpieces) that person is immediately jumped on, rather than engaged in a discussion or provided with resources. Or, if they deign to explain, it is incredibly condescending.

I understand there may always be an elitist aspect to certain feminist discussion. But I think one of the reasons people swing to the extreme right is no one wants to be treated like they're stupid. Or called a bigot for disagreeing or having different ideas. I understand wanting no part a "movement" that forces you to walk on eggshells and allows for zero difference in ideas. I know every movement is vulnerable to ideological puritanism, but I see radical feminists as people who are generally able to disagree respectfully and who actually talk through differences in opinion rather than immediately jumping to "YOU'RE A BAD PERSON" and name calling. It's one of the things I appreciated about this sub when I first started lurking. Even though some things were shocking to me (just being so used to "trans women are women" it was a shock to the system seeing them referred to as males), I kept reading and learning because of the way people conduct themselves here. "Ohhhh these women actually care about putting women first!".

(eccentricvibe)
I'm convinced that libfems have so much anger towards radfems because the majority of us actually do research and have well rounded opinions. A lot of libfems really don't know shit about the history of feminism, all of their talking points come from Tumblr/social media in general and they dismiss 2nd wave feminism as "old TERF bullshit" even though those are the women that helped get the right to vote and better access to healthcare.

(afistfulofyen)
Libfems are the definition of birdbrained. The men need them tho: that water won't carry itself!

How I love that they compare THEMSELVES to the handmaidens when they are the aunts.

Friend_Of_Incels #fundie reddit.com

My Plan For Incels

I have devised a scheme for incels here that will give you all a happy life. I intend to become rich and save you.

I will round up incels and invite them to come to my private incel compound. It will be monetised and open to visitors to ensure we can live our lives in a luxurious manner. I believe that incels are truly repressed to not know love and I will try and save you all from that.

In the morning we will all meet in a grand hall to discuss and debate whatever we wish, in an organised manner. These debates will be recorded as a piece of history and will be uploaded to the internet. Incels are then given free time to do whatever they wish, I will provide gyms and private grounds to walk, access to the internet and literature, and even a place to talk to normies, chads, stacies, landwhales etc.

Each incel will have their own room. I cannot guarantee how big or luxurious they will be, but I can guarantee that all will be able to sleep in the grand hall if they so wish. Incels will all eat together in comradeship and will be encouraged to be open minded.

Willing females will be allowed in to certain areas where incels can interact if they wish. Those who do not may spend their time building, philosophising or creating art.

At 9pm we will all gather in the hall, and incels will pray to me and ask for better lives. There is no doubt that by publicising inceldom people will take notice and learn to be more inclusive. If not then we will gather enough incels and declare ourselves a new state. You will all slowly but surely become chads, and those with the best genes will be allowed to breed with women who also possess powerful genes. Our eugenics programme will eventually allow incels to function in society, and wipe out this plague that affects you all.

Incel Wiki #fundie wiki.incels.info

Welcome to the incel Wiki! Members are encouraged to detail the forums of incels, incel memes, prominent incels, historical events, lingo etc.

Rules:

Do *not* post content violating US/international law, create a page about someone under 18, or post calls to violence or encouragement of suicide

Do *not* post content not available to the public, or sensitive personal information like street addresses, private social media photos, social security numbers, and the like.

Disclaimer: Most things contained in this wiki are meant to be satire. Do not take this forum seriously. It is not your personal politics wiki. If you would like an image or whatever removed, please make note of so on the relevant talk page or for sooner removal PM 'master' in this discord server: link and also leave a message in the server. Incel Wiki is against any form of threatening comments or content, or content violating US/international law. Admins/mods endeavor to monitor & appropriately deal with any such material but can not be online all the time & as such it is members responsibility to act in accordance with the law. As such Incel Wiki takes no responsibility for the actions of others in this Wiki.

INCEL

An, "incel", is someone who has been totally shit on by the world to the point where they are 'involuntarily celibate' for six months or more. Incels are known for being poor, being victims of abuse, living with their parents, having medical disabilities, and spending way too much time on the internet. Many, but not all incels forums, subscribe to the philosophy of the, "blackpill".

Many people make fun of incels for having a victim complex. However it is completely justified for incels to have a victim complex given they are usually ugly or bullied/ostracized to the point of having bad social skills. The same people who tell male incels that they are entitled and whiney, are usually the same people who feel entitled to non-sexual emotional labor of others through government and the same people who tell men they need to express their feelings more. Apparently men are supposed to express their feelings but their feelings are 'invalid' and therefore 'should not be expressed'.

image
Incels are the vanguard of tearing down gender roles

Advice from Normies

Since normies don't like to pair up people anymore, they tell incels it's near 100% incels own fault that they can't find a partner. So they offer self-help "advice". Incels are told by normies that looks don't matter, but normies always are curious about how ugly incels are and assume they don't take enough showers or get enough haircuts. They tell incels to be themselves, but to pick up hobbies they don't like. They tell incels that pick up artists are full of shit but that incels don't have enough 'game' to date rape drunk women at bars 'pick up women'. They tell incels that they are too nice but also that they are assholes. They tell incels that sexual intimacy is not that important, but they themselves buy and/or create movies and songs about how sexual intimacy is one of the most important things in the world and they get upset if they have a few week long dry spell.

They tell incels that sexual intimacy isn't a commodity in a game with a reward, but think of male virgins as "losers" and tell incels that they don't "deserve" intimacy due to their actions.

For an incel, asking advice about dating from a normie is like phoning up a lazy customer service operator for a corrupt company. The operator will say whatever they can to get the customer off the line as soon as soon as possible without care for consistency or accuracy, or witnessing meaningful results born from their 'advice'.

Normies, especially feminist normies will often insist that incels are the correct batch of people not to be partnered up. After all it would make women and society seem a lot more just if that were the case. They will insist that sexual freedom is a sorting mechanism for male feminists and good personalities like OJ Simpson and Jeremy Meeks, and that your local grocery store bagger deserves to be an incel because maybe he went on 4chan once or twice.

image
Normies, when not lying to incels about celibacy being easy, in reality consider going even 40 days without sexual intimacy as complete savagery

Anonymous #sexist archiveofsins.com

I think feminism was never as hated as it is today, gotta ask yourself why. since feminists are usually egocentric as fuck, they won't realize it's a problem in the movement (i.e. using very vocal crazy womyn), that ends in hate from literally every group.
>men hate feminists
>GBT hates feminism
>probably even lesbians hate feminism
>black people hate feminism
>spics hate them
>asians hate feminism
>plenty, actually a shit-ton, of straight women hate feminism
I really don't know any group in society, that doesn't have a respectable amount of people, who hate modern feminism.
no, it's not because we feel threatened, it's because you talk shit and put shame to a theoretically valid movement.

Anders Behring Breivik #fundie sites.google.com

Sitting Bull is and was a hero who is celebrated by America's indigenous peoples, Native Americans. He was an Indian chief who fought on behalf of his people against General Armstrong Custer and the U.S. forces. Crazy Horse and Chief Gall were other militant leaders of the American indigenous peoples. Were Sitting Bull, Crazy Horse and Chief Gall terrorists because they were fighting for their ethnic group, for their indigenous rights and culture? Or were they heroes? Were they evil terrorists, or were they heroes? American and European history books describe them as heroes and not as terrorists. Meanwhile, militant nationalists in Europe are described as terrorists and murderers because they are fighting for exactly the same ideals. Isn't that hypocritical and extremely racist?

jerkmypython & BlackPillEnema #sexist reddit.com

I love seeing IT exposed by the rest of reddit

image

It was pretty nice until they started ganging up on some manlet. It's great to see IT-tards get shit flung back at them, but they fact they were making fun of some IT-tard's height is more proof these people do hold biases against manlets in real life no matter how "socially successful" they are.

Just more proof it isn't in our heads, despite whatever normalfags claim.

Never fall for the Chad/Incel alliance shit or for the idea that normies are more like us than Incel Tears. If anything, the men on Incel Tears should have our sympathy because they are being misled by foids and they have their dicks locked up in little cages and are totally unaware of who they actually are. The only reason we're on this sub instead of theirs, is because we were fortunate enough to come across the right information at the right time.

This has nothing to do with a Chad/Incel alliance. The issue is every day-to-day normalfags, who have nothing special going on for them, still think like this.

You'd think a manlet who still gets bullied for being short, despite supposedly having a girlfriend and being social would agree with at least some of the shit we have to say. I guess there's no getting through with some people.

Why would you think a guy who's got his would have any symapthy for us? A manlet with a girlfriend views himself as superior to all other manlets and then starts to imagine he isn't actually a manlet.


This is the problem with a lot of incels, they get caught up in one particular feature and start to miss the forest for the trees. A black incel and a white incel have more in common than a black incel and a black chad. A manlet incel and lanklet incel have more in common than a manlet incel has in common with Tom Cruise. Non-incels are never going to be on your side because they view you to be pathetic, even if you share maybe one feature with them.

Tallfag incels would still treat a manlet like shit, it doesn't matter if that manlet is an incel or not. There is no "brother ship" between either group, even if both parties are normalfags.

There should be a mutual respect among all manlets, because even if they manage to get a girlfriend they still have to deal with the social implications of being short. Tallfags can still bank on the fact that most people won't fuck with them or make an "example" of them for one reason or another.

Cope. Keep on falling for this bullshit that divides incels. Your fantasy that lanklets somehow don't get fucked with is hilarious. They just get fucked with over different things. If you are ugly and tall, you will get compared to nosferatu or an ogre or some other shit and women will still think you're a creep and unless you're buff, other men will still fuck with you. And as an ugly tall guy you will have average looking manlets fuck with you and use every opportunity they get to shit on you because they know that if tried the same shit on tall Chads they'd be fucked, but they can get away with it because you have no status as an ugly man.

You have tied your entire identity to being short the same way many ethnics on here blame their inceldom entirely on being ethnic. There is only one true connection between incels, and that's looking like shit. There are a lot of different ways to look like shit, whether that be balding, skin problems, bad bone structure, poor height, or something else, but an ugly man will always have more in common with an ugly man than he will with a Chad who just happens to share one small feature with him.

Wrong. Sure, if you're ugly you do have less status, but being a tallfag still gives you status to a certain extent because of how much society fetishizes height. Manlets have next to none unless they're maxxed out in virtually every category imaginable. There's a reason why the only socially successful manlets are involved in media or are extremely fucking rich.

Your height is everything in the eyes of normalfags.

Oddly enough, there are more examples of ethnics finding "love" than there are of manlets. Hell, there's even an entire album of indian guys with girlfriends, even hot ones. I've yet to see the same shit with manlets.

There are a ton of good looking manlets who still have zero luck finding girlfriends.

You think that's you, right? Sorry, but no, you're ugly. It's not only because you're short, it's because you're short and ugly. Being an incel requires a combo.

I've literally been told I have an attractive face (and no, not by family either), but I'm too short to fuck. I've also been told "I'd make a decent boyfriend if I was taller" too, so I'm pretty sure it's only height that's holding me back.

It also doesn't change the fact I know manlets who are definitely more attractive than me, and they still see nothing. These cunts don't care, they emphasize height over everything.

I've been told by female friends that I'm attractive as well. Guess what, women lie. They lie about everything and anything. You're not actually good looking. You'll figure that out one day.

ROBERT JENSEN #fundie feministcurrent.com

The art of avoiding definitions: A review of ‘Trans*: A Quick and Quirky Account of Gender Variability’

“Let me define the terms, and I’ll win any debate,” a friend told me years ago, an insight I’ve seen confirmed many times in intellectual and political arenas.

But after reading Jack Halberstam’s new book, Trans*: A Quick and Quirky Account of Gender Variability, I would amend that observation: Debates also can be won by making sure a term is never clearly defined. The transgender movement has yet to offer coherent explanations of the concepts on which its policy proposals are based, yet support is nearly universal in left/liberal circles. Whether or not it was the author’s intention, Trans* feels like an attempt at an outline of such explanation, but I’m sorry to report that the book offers neither clarity nor coherence.

I say sorry, because I came to the book hoping to gain greater understanding of the claims of the transgender movement, which I have not found elsewhere. Halberstam — a professor in Department of English and Comparative Literature and the Institute for Research on Women, Gender, and Sexuality at Columbia University — has been writing about this subject for more than two decades and is one of the most prominent U.S. trans* intellectuals. The table of contents looked promising, but the book only deepened my belief that a radical feminist and ecological critique of the transgender movement’s ideology is necessary.

Rather than be defensive about the ambiguity of the transgender argument, Halberstam celebrates the lack of definition as a strength of the movement, an indication that trans* offers deep insights for everyone. If we shift our focus from “the housing of the body” and embrace “perpetual transition” then “we can commit to a horizon of possibility where the future is not male or female but transgender,” he writes. Instead of “male-ish” and “female-ish” bodies we can realize “the body is always under construction” and “consider whether the foundational binary of male-female may possibly have run its course.”

The very act of naming and categorizing imposes limits that constrain the imagination, according to Halberstam, hence the use of the asterisk:

“I have selected the term ‘trans*’ for this book precisely to open the term up to unfolding categories of being organized around but not confined to forms of gender variance. As we will see, the asterisk modifies the meaning of transitivity by refusing to situate transition in relation to a destination, a final form, a specific shape, or an established configuration of desire and identity. The asterisk holds off the certainty of diagnosis; it keeps at bay any sense of knowing in advance what the meaning of this or that gender variant form may be, and perhaps most importantly, it makes trans* people the authors of their own categorizations. As this book will show, trans* can be a name for expansive forms of difference, haptic [relating to the sense of touch] relations to knowing, uncertain modes of being, and the disaggregation of identity politics predicated upon the separating out of many kinds of experience that actually blend together, intersect, and mix. This terminology, trans*, stands at odds with the history of gender variance, which has been collapsed into concise definitions, sure medical pronouncements, and fierce exclusions.”

I quote at length to demonstrate that in using shorter excerpts from the book I am not cherry-picking a few particularly abstruse phrases to poke fun at a certain form of postmodern academic writing. My concern is not stylistic but about the arguments being presented. After reading that passage a couple of times, I think I can figure out what Halberstam’s trying to say. The problem is that it doesn’t say anything very helpful.

To be fair, Halberstam is correct in pointing out that the instinct to categorize all the world’s life, human and otherwise — “the mania for the godlike function of naming” — went hand in hand with colonialism, part of the overreach of a certain mix of politics and science in attempting to control the world. But like it or not, humans make sense of the world by naming, which need not go forward with claims of imperial domination or divine insight. We define the terms we use in trying to explain the world so that we can meaningfully communicate about that world; when a term means nothing specific, or means everything, or means nothing and everything at the same time, it is of no value unless one wants to obfuscate.

But, if Halberstam is to be believed, this criticism is irrelevant, because transgenderism “has never been simply a new identity among many others competing for space under the rainbow umbrella. Rather, it constitutes radically new knowledge about the experience of being in a body and can be the basis for very different ways of seeing the world.” So, if I don’t get it, the problem apparently is the limits of my imagination — I don’t grasp the radically new knowledge — not because the explanation is lacking.

After reading the book, I continue to believe that the intellectual project of the transgender movement isn’t so much wrong as it is incoherent, and the political project is not liberatory but regressive. What this book “keeps at bay” is a reasonable, honest request: What does any of this mean?

In other writing — here in 2014 and again in 2016, along with a chapter in my 2017 book The End of Patriarchy: Radical Feminism for Men — I’ve asked how we should understand transgenderism if the movement’s claim is that a male human can actually be female (or vice versa) in biological terms. If transgender signals a dissatisfaction with the culturally constructed gender norms of patriarchy — which are rigid, repressive, and reactionary — I’ve suggested it would be more effective to embrace the longstanding radical feminist critique of patriarchy.

Rather than repeat those arguments here, I want to try another approach, stating simply that I have good reason to believe I’m real, that the human species of which I am a member is real, and that the ecosphere of which we are a part is real. That is, there is a material reality to the world within which I, and all other carbon-based life forms, operate. I cannot know everything there is to know about that material world, of course, but I can trust that it is real.

The cultural/political/economic systems that shape human societies make living in the real world complex and confusing, and the ways those systems distribute wealth and power are often morally unacceptable. But to challenge that injustice, it’s necessary to understand that real world and communicate my understanding to others in clear fashion.

In left/liberal circles, especially on college campuses, “trans*” increasingly is where the action is for those concerned with social justice. It offers — for everyone, whether transgender-identified or not — the appearance of serious intellectual work and progressive politics. Endorsing the transgender project is a way to signal one is on the cutting edge, and work like Halberstam’s is embraced in these circles, where support for the transgender movement is required to be truly intersectional.

My challenge to those whose goal is liberation is simple: How does this help us understand the real world we are trying to change? How does it help us understand patriarchy, the system of institutionalized male dominance out of which so much injustice emerges?

Halberstam likely would put me in the category of “transphobic feminism” for “refusing to seriously engage” with transfeminism, but I am not transphobic (if, by that term, we mean one who is afraid of, or hateful toward, people who identify as transgender). Nor do I refuse to seriously engage other views (unless we describe a critique of another intellectual position as de facto evidence of a lack of serious engagement). I am rooted in radical feminism, one of those “versions of feminism that still insist on the centrality of female-bodied women,” according to Halberstam.

On that point, Halberstam is accurate: radical feminists argue that patriarchy is rooted in men’s claim to own or control women’s reproductive power and sexuality. Radical feminists distinguish between sex (male XY and female XX, a matter of biology) and gender (masculinity and femininity, a matter of culture and power), which means that there is no way to understand the rigid gender norms of patriarchy without recognizing the relevance of the category of “female-bodied women.” It’s hard to imagine how the binary of male-female could “run its course” given the reality of sexual reproduction.

This is where an ecological perspective, alongside and consistent with a radical feminist critique, reminds us that the world is real and we are living beings, not machines. In discussing his own top surgery (the removal of breasts), Halberstam speaks of working with the doctor:

“Together we were building something in flesh, changing the architecture of my body forever. The procedure was not about building maleness into my body; it was about editing some part of the femaleness that currently defined me. I did not think I would awake as a new self, only that some of my bodily contours would shift in ways that gave me a different bodily abode.”

We all have a right to understand ourselves as we please, and so here’s my response: My body is not a house that was constructed by an architect but rather — like all other life on the planet — is a product of evolution. I resist the suggestion I can “build” myself and recognize that a sustainable human presence on the planet is more likely if we accept that we are part of a larger living world, which has been profoundly damaged when humans treat it as our property to dominate and control.

This is the irony of Halberstam’s book and the transgender project more generally. After labeling the project of categorizing/defining as imperialist and critiquing the “mania for the godlike function of naming,” he has no problem endorsing the “godlike function” of reshaping bodies as if they were construction materials. There’s a deepening ecological sensibility in progressive politics, an awareness of what happens when humans convince ourselves that we can remake the world and ignore the biophysical limits of the ecosphere. While compassionately recognizing the reasons people who identify as transgender may seek surgery and hormone/drug treatments, we shouldn’t suppress concerns about the movement’s embrace of extreme high-tech intervention into the body, including the surgical destruction of healthy tissue and long-term health issues due to cross-sex hormones and hormone-like drugs.

I have long tried to observe what in rhetoric is sometimes called “the principle of charity,” a commitment in debate to formulating an opponent’s argument in the strongest possible version so that one’s critique is on firm footing. I have tried to do that in this review, though I concede that I’m not always sure what Halberstam is arguing, and so I may not be doing his arguments justice. But that is one of my central points: When I read this book — and many other arguments from transgender people and their allies — I routinely find myself confused, unable to understand just what is being proposed. So, again, I’ll quote at length in the hopes of being fair in my assessment, this time the book’s closing paragraph:

“Trans* bodies, in their fragmented, unfinished, broken-beyond-repair forms, remind all of us that the body is always under construction. Whether trans* bodies are policed in bathrooms or seen as killers and loners, as thwarted, lonely, violent, or tormented, they are also a site for invention, imagination, fabulous projection. Trans* bodies represent the art of becoming, the necessity of imagining, and the fleshy insistence of transitivity.”

Once again, after reading that passage a couple of times, I think I understand, sort of, the point. But, once again, I don’t see how it advances our understanding of sex and gender, of patriarchy and power. I am not alone in this assessment; people I know, including some who are sympathetic to the transgender movement’s political project, have shared similar concerns, though they often mute themselves in public to avoid being labeled transphobic.

I’m not asking of the transgender movement some grand theory to explain all the complexity of sex and gender. I just need a clear and coherent place to start. Asking questions is not transphobic, nor is observing that such clarity and coherence are lacking.

metabuxx #sexist #psycho incels.co

[RageFuel] Imagine 50 men and 50 women are stranded on an island after a violent sea storm.

They are out of resources so they would have to cooperate together for survival until help arrives.

Now imagine that out of those 50 men, 5 are Chads. What do you think is gonna happen? Each one of those 50 women will be fucking Chads for the rest of their days on the island while the other 45 men will be rotting alone. Holes will be like - "Its just a preference sweaty. Why don't you go fix the ship while I suck Chad's dick"

Do you see this island functioning at all? What incentive would these men have to contribute to the island's economy? Why the fuck would they even contribute? Just so that those holes and Chads can fuck without any worry.

And if you can't see this island functioning then how do you expect the society to function. A society where millions of women are dying to be a part of Chad's harems while their looksmatches are rotting in their basement. JFL at this cucked society.

We'd enslave the whores and make chads build ships

based thing to do

the other men would just kill the chads and redistribute the foids with the 5 left out used for being raped by anyone

Rapemaxing is the only way for sub-8 men to ascend

I think there was a show similar to this.
what ended up happening was the Chads didnt do anything (okay they did hunt once or twice) and fucked any woman they wanted. all the women didn't help in any serious way (they would fucking gather firewood/driftwood and shit that fell off the trees) and eat all the food and complain about everything then the average guys did 90% of the work. building stuff. cooking the food. making shelter. gathering food and resources.

The girls that were not good enough for Chad would find a beta male and fuck him and live in his hut and get free resources. but that was only 2-3 guys. All Chads fucked. All girls fucked. 2-3 average guys fucked. The rest rotted away BUT STILL HAD TO CONTRIBUTE to the group otherwise the women would call him a pig and sully his name to the rest of the group. then he would be outcast. So even though they were literally getting NOT A SINGLE DAM THING from the group they still had to contribute otherwise be ousted. Hmmmmm...sorta like society, eh?

(And to be fair I never watched the show. I ended up reading an article on it that some MGTOW youtube channel had posted)

Utterly brutal. Exact replica of the modern society.

I would take down the other men at night and have all the womens to myself

You must be a gymcel but I'm going to ask anyway
Realistically, how many women could you beat up at once?

Reason I ask is because if you kill all the Chads the women are not just going to let you fuck them willingly. They are going to revolt against you. Could you win against 10 women at once?

I'd probably gather a few based brocels and brutally murder chads, then rape the bitches (actually I think they'd just simply accept me submissively). I've seen this behavior among chimps btw.

nah man they would. Women are submissive. If even men act this way among alpha males despite clearly being able to kill him once let alone women who are naturally designed to avoid conflict.

Ill get a sharpened stick and start jabbing the ugly ones and the stronger women first. Then when they see i mean business theyll give up

Damn I didn't know you were a High-IQcel as well
you've thought about this scenario before lol

In a situation like this, are we assuming the same intellect or intellect inverse to looks?

In that case I think what you said above holds true for a few weeks/ months, but then the smartest normies and incels would start their own group, and go find a separate part of the island, and they would just cope there. They'd figure out more efficient ways to get food and other essential shit, meanwhile chad would fuck 7-8 foids a day, but eventually he'd get screwed cos he won't have evolved. Some Becky's would take the hint and move in with the normies (betabux) and eventually Stacy might go tell chad to bully the normies and incels to give them shit, but by this time you'd have a group of 20 high IQ normies incels made one 'state' 5 chads and medium IQ normies in another, so the 5 chads won't be able to do shit to the incels, it's quite likely incels will develop weapons too, so then chad dies out, but presumably they already impregnated the Stacies .

Incel state might send their highest T normies to go kill weakened/ dehydrated chad (ngl I knew a slayer who didn't know u can't drink seawater), and take the Stacies, and then they will kill chads spawn.

Fucking based prediction. This way they could emerge as winners without even rapemaxing. Even the simps in the group would support it.

The Sector Union #conspiracy forum.nationstates.net

WARNING : THIS IS NOT A BLOG POST. THIS IS INFORMATION FOR A DISCUSSION.

This is just too much.

Aurora Colorado Shootings
12 deaths, 58 injuries
Suspect : James Holmes

Sandy Hook Elementary Shootings
28 deaths, 2 injured
Suspect : Adam Lanza

Christopher Dorner Shootout
4 deaths, some casaulties
Suspect : Christopher Dorner

Many more minor but deadly shootings happened throughout the 2012-2013 but about 3-4 like I mentioned were the biggest. But why did these have so many headlines? Why are all the death numbers an even number?

and now my friends, we have the Santa Monica Shooting. It was only a small number of deaths luckily, 4.
SOURCE: http://abcnews.go.com/US/santa-monica-shootings-suspect-identified-john-zawahri/story?id=19359338#.UbTJsPm1GSo

These have got to be a complete set-up. Don't mistake me, the deaths are real, but the motives? We all get the same information. Crazy, lunatics with a gun out to kill. Same shit, different day.

But you need to remember, lives are at stake here. I think there is a secret gun control cult out there sending out suicidal agents to kill and push the gun control bill to congress by creating an orchestra of calculated massacres on not only the American people, but the people of the world. You might recognize the name of Anders Behring Breivik, a Norwegian shooter who killed 77 deaths and over 200 casualties. And that is a huge, huge death toll that happened in a country that's got a lot of liberals. See no one is safe. Now and then, the liberal countries get shot up to attempt to prove to you guns are evil.

It''s sickening.

Now is the government behind this? No. Governments would never do this actually. Many conspiracy theorists think the governments or the corporations are out to get you and do evil things like this. This is a people conspiracy. The people are behind this. The people are out there, organized into these cults to kill and to manipulate the governments. The Govenment has become the victim, not the villain! It's the complete opposite. What we feared most of a very controlling authoritarian, fascist government, is actually a reverse-oppressive-democracy. The Government is a puppet to the evil citizens.


Don't point your fingers at the government, point your fingers at the people. The people are plotting these massacres to get the guns taken away!!!!!!!!!


Now,

Your thoughts?

Various Incels #sexist #psycho #racist incels.co

(Lv99_BixNood)

[JFL] Women are weak and pathetic

There's so many roasties who say they'd beat up (jfl) or shoot incels if they ever met one.

i always get a laugh out of these fantasys, 1 its not the media framing you, your being judged by your own actions and the shit you say, 2 for every incel is a fuckton more men whod beat your ass down for trying to steal rights from half the bloody planet, so yeah we can stop it

In reality none of them have the balls (literally) to point a gun at a man and pull the trigger. 3 billion armed women wouldn't be able to oppose a measly force of 50 incels because they have the mentality of cowards. Women are not a threat to anyone, it's the simps who fight for them who are dangerous.

(grondilu)

I agree. It is very naïve to think that weapons equalize people. I mean, to some degree they do, but the fact remains that in a armed conflict, the determination to actually use the weapon matters more than its efficacity.

(Robtical)

Women are not a threat to anyone, it's the simps who fight for them who are dangerous.

This is why their needs to be uncucked men who beat the shit out of simps every time they act up.

image

Despite what your brocel said the other day, a lot of ladies have no problem with firearms. I’ll pump lead into whoever have to in order to not live the damn Handmaids Tale.

I guess it's also justifiable for us to pump lead into cucks and whores who force non chads into following cucked laws and pay taxes to the gynocentric government.

theyll get their men to beat incels, its just talk

Their needs to be uncucked men to beat up their "men" whenever they try to act like faggots.

(Justice Bao)

Even the weakest men (myself included) are stronger tha 80% of foids.
´

if you not consider black foids, yes

Honestly it's not even about physical strength, the weakest part of women is their mentality. 90% of women would break down crying in any combat situation.

based and redpilled

(JosefMengelecel)

They are pussies they won’t do shit. Even if she tried to fire a gun the recoil would probably break their arms and send them flying backwards

These Untermenschen are not stronk enough to handle the FG42, am I right Josef ?

Yeah the Untermenschen are weak and will be sent to the gas chambers in auschwitz or I will experiment on them by sewing them to their twin or injecting blue dye into their eyes in minecraft

WorldGoneCrazy #fundie disqus.com

I'm just not going to let some idiot who doesn't know me or my beliefs pigeonhole me into some nonexistent radical pro-abortion cult.


"nonexistent radical pro-abortion cult"

"“I love abortion. I don’t accept it. I don’t view it as a necessary evil. I embrace it. I donate to abortion funds. I write about how important it is to make sure that every woman has access to safe, legal abortion services. I have bumper stickers and buttons and t-shirts proclaiming my support for reproductive freedom. I love abortion. And I bristle every time a fellow activist uses a trendy catch-phrase or rallying cry meant to placate pro-lifers. The first of these, ‘Make abortion safe, legal, and rare!” has been used for decades as a call for abortion rights.’ " ... “Terminating a pregnancy is not an unethical act, yet suggesting that abortion should be rare implies that there is something undesirable about having one.” -- Jessica DelBalzo

Filmed her abortion and proud of it: http://thestir .cafemom .com/bizarre_news/172111/woman_films_her_own_abortion

Super proud of her abortion: http://chicksontheright .com/blog/item/28339-girls-star-is-super-proud-of-her-abortion-and-wants-you-to-know-it

Facebook page celebrating abortion: https://www .facebook .com/pages/I-Had-An-Abortion/138570696250541

#ShoutYourAbortion

http:// www .salon .com/2015/09/22/my_abortion_made_me_happy_the_story_that_started_the_shoutyourabo

“For many women abortion represents a moral and ethical dilemma, but for …upper middle class ambitious ones, it does not. For many women, the regrets and the wishful what ifs they indulge in after an abortion are slightly below “what if I had chunked economics and majored in art”…they see abortion as a “means to a lifestyle that would allow them to view sex as a pleasure…a lifestyle that allowed room for irresponsibility” No Birth, No Pangs, Washington Post 3/21/1993)


The quotes prove nothing. It's like I said, they're probably just trying to fire you up and push your buttons. And if a few people like that do exist, they're hardly even a blip on the radar. None of this will sink in, of course, you'll continue to view abortion in purely black or white terms and compare anyone who disagrees with you even slightly to slavers, Jew gassers, etc. Your song is a very old and tired one.


"The quotes prove nothing."

Only to the willfully ignorant and deliberately obtuse. For the rest of us, the quotes prove that there really are people out there who are so sick that they are proud of their abortions. You spend your entire time here arguing against pro-lifers, yet you do not have the intellectual honesty, or courage, to admit you are a pro-abort.

"compare anyone who disagrees with you even slightly to slavers, Jew gassers, etc"

If the jackboot and whip fit, then wear them. The arguments that apologists for slavery and Jew gassing made are precisely the same as the ones made by pro-aborts for abortion. The DETAILS are different - every human rights atrocity differs on details - but the underlying foundation is always the same: certain humans are declared to be "less than human" - just like you have done throughout this thread, by pretending that the baby in the womb is not a baby - and that means that those "sub-humans" can be killed or mis-treated. Might makes right is your ideology. Those little babies can't fight back, so it is OK to kill them in your world.

You just don't like it, because you know that the underlying arguments ARE the same. And it hurts your feelings to think that you might be wrong. So, you deny and deflect to keep from changing.


Jew gassing and slave trading have already been shut down, Crazy. See my last message. They are terrible, useless examples because there are situations where abortions must be carried out to save the mother's life. You know this.


"Those quotes prove nothing."

If by "nothing," you mean a "ton," then yes. :-)

"You don't know the people who made them, nor under what circumstances."

Oh well, that is true for EVERY single quote from history. Now, you sound like you are devolving.

"Jew gassing and slave trading have already been shut down,"

Thank goodness we stopped your morally depraved ancestors. :-)

"there are situations where abortions must be carried out to save the mother's life"

If there are such cases, and the vast majority of OB's say there are not, then they are 1 in a billion. So, how do you justify the 60 million in Amerika alone and the 1.5-2 billion worldwide? Or, are you ready to become pro-life with an exception for the life of the mother?!?

(Not expecting an answer for that question - just more devolving and deflecting.)

6 million Jews gassed.

60 million preborn humans killed by abortion in Amerika alone.

That's not "progress."

Matt Barber #fundie worldnetdaily.com

Ritualistic Baal worship, in sum, looked a little like this: Adults would gather around the altar of Baal. Infants would then be burned alive as a sacrificial offering to the deity. Amid horrific screams and the stench of charred human flesh, congregants – men and women alike – would engage in bisexual orgies. The ritual of convenience was intended to produce economic prosperity by prompting Baal to bring rain for the fertility of "mother earth."

.............

Modern liberalism deviates little from its ancient predecessor. While its macabre rituals have been sanitized with flowery and euphemistic terms of art, its core tenets and practices remain eerily similar. The worship of "fertility" has been replaced with worship of "reproductive freedom" or "choice." Child sacrifice via burnt offering has been updated, ever so slightly, to become child sacrifice by way of abortion. The ritualistic promotion, practice and celebration of both heterosexual and homosexual immorality and promiscuity have been carefully whitewashed – yet wholeheartedly embraced – by the cults of radical feminism, militant "gay rights" and "comprehensive sex education." And, the pantheistic worship of "mother earth" has been substituted – in name only – for radical environmentalism.

Corey Savage #sexist returnofkings.com

10 Feminist Fantasies That Could Become A Reality In The Near Future

Corey is an iconoclast and the author of ‘Man’s Fight for Existence’. He believes that the key to life is for men to honour their primal nature.

Around 2013 when I first discovered the manosphere, I knew things were bad in our society in terms of sex relations along with the corroding effects of feminism. But at the time, I didn’t appreciate just know how bad. In just few years since then, I’ve seen enough madness to know which direction we’re headed and it doesn’t look good. We already live in a feminist society and the harpies are pushing to make things even harder for ordinary men who just want to get on with their lives. The following will demonstrate what will happen to our society if we were to give into all the demented demands of today’s feminists.

Although this article is meant to highlight the craziness of it all, note that many of these concepts are already starting to take shape in our societies to become a reality.

1. Expansion Of Hate-Crime Laws
image
“You can’t save Mary Jane anymore, Spiderman. It’s ‘benevolent sexism’, and therefore, a misogynistic hate-crime.”

In England, trying to pick-up a woman or even just whistling at her is considered a “hate crime” if the woman gets upset by it. It is a real possibility that this law might spread to the rest of the West and expand to include other misogynist offenses including: looking at a woman (what feminists call “stare rape”), calling a trans-woman a he (there’s already a similar law in New York), arguing with women online, manspreading, mansplaining, helping a woman, and so on.

2. Consent Forms
image
Since women get to dictate the terms of all sexual interactions, consent forms will have to become a necessity in the future. And not just for sex, but in all forms of interaction like being able to approach a woman on the street. Maybe an app will be developed where a woman could consent to sex, conversation, or being looked at so that she could screen out all the low-life misogynists who want to compliment her for her looks.

3. Anonymous Rape Accusations + 100% Belief In Woman’s Testament
image
All men are rapists; we need to believe her because she’s a woman. It’s a perfect circular logic.

Feminists claim that the reason we live in a patriarchal rape culture is because our society discourages rape victims (always women) from coming forward and also because their words are not taken seriously. So, what they’re proposing is clear: rape accusations should be done anonymously and the “victims” should always be believed against evidences that are biased because… patriarchy.

Men have already lost their jobs, kicked out of school, jailed, and even murdered for false rape accusations while their accusers faced no legal consequences (and got to keep their anonymity). So, we’re not really that far from reaching that level.

4. Feminist Re-Education Camps
image
This book is not a mandatory reading in kindergartens yet. What more proof do you need that we are all oppressed by the patriarchy?

With feminism taking over the educational institutions and already working to reprogram men to serve the system, it won’t be long before men who have been found guilty of misogynist hate crimes to end up in re-education camps. We already have sensitivity training in jobs while colleges are adding courses on toxic masculinity to re-define what it is to be a man on feminist terms. It probably won’t be long before “toxic masculinity” is added to DSM as a mental disorder (in place of homosexuality) and treated like a disease in mental health institutions.

5. Government-Sponsored Feminist Tribunals
image
Canada already has an actual social justice tribunal.

Since it’ll be difficult to charge men of bogus hate crimes against women with nothing more than a woman’s feelings as a proof, the government may introduce tribunals similar to the kangaroo courts in universities and HR departments at workplaces, all in the name of creating a harmonious society free of hate. Those who enter these tribunals will also be destroyed by the media and have no chance of being employed and be subject to permanent social ostracism even if they’re found not guilty.

6. Systemic Castration
image
As I’ve mentioned in my other article, docile and compliant dogs are the ideal that feminists aim for in their efforts to domesticate men. A significant number of boys are already on ADHD medication to have their behaviors controlled while male sex offenders are given chemical castration. If all men are violent hooligans and rapists as some feminists claim, then the next logical step is to let the government control men’s testosterone levels to an “acceptable” level. Note that we already have many parents who are letting their children take hormones to alter their “gender.” This practice will likely become more common in the future.

7. Non-contact Sex
image
“She did not consent; I must not touch.”

Feminists have been so effective in terrorizing the beta males that many of them are afraid to interact with women in any shape or form. Consider that we already live in a world where walking past some deranged woman will get you accused of sexual assault. In the future, all physical contact with women may become sternly discouraged or even forbidden that more men will retreat to porn and sexbots as alternatives. Haptic technology for sex is already being developed to pave the way for a culture of non-contact sex.
8. Bachelor Tax
image
Did you think you pesky “MRA’s” could escape the gynocentric order by refusing marriage and going your own way? With the drop in number of men who are manning up that coincides with the rising number of single mothers who need to leech the welfare state, it’s not too unreasonable to expect a push for bachelor tax that will penalize men who refuse to put a ring on an aging, post-slut sow.

Knowing that it will cause a major backlash, the bachelor tax will probably not come into being in an obvious way. Instead, it will be introduced under the guise of supporting the poor single mothers and helping to foster families. Heck, considering how men are the primary tax payers while women are the primary beneficiaries of the welfare state, you could say that we already have a gynocentric taxation system in all but name.

9. Polyandry
image
Women already practice ‘Alpha fucks, Beta bucks’ strategy. So why shouldn’t an empowered woman be allowed to do it openly without shame?

With the institution of marriage already destroyed and with many men already accepting cuckoldery as the norm in the form of “open marriage,” women may as well be allowed to have multiple husbands. And why not? We already know that there are far too many men for the number of women in our society and that those lazy men should do more to support women. Is it that crazy to have one husband for sex and another three for money? I’m sure many desperate simps will have no issue sharing a wife with several other men as long as they get some cuddling action when she’s not too busy banging her more attractive husbands. The implementation of bachelor tax, mentioned above, will also make marriage more desirable.

10. Concentration Camps For Men
image
The final solution to the testosterone problem.

If the above measures to protect women and ensure equality are implemented, it’s likely that all the misogynists will grumble in anger and resist them. If that is the case, it might be best to take the advice of the feminist, Julie Bindel, and place all men in concentration camps. No man, no problem! If you’re wondering how feminists could even achieve this, know that there is already an army of goons called the police who will gladly do as they’re told to maintain the gynocentric order.

Conclusion

As I’ve said in an older article of mine, feminism is practically a terrorist movement that demands more and more political, social, and cultural oppression of men for the sake of radical women who play the eternal victim and cry for never-ending privileges. While you may think that the above nightmare scenarios are over-the-top and unlikely to happen, I bet those who lived just few generations ago couldn’t have imagined what we’re witnessing today either. Feminism, by colluding with the government, will continue to grow like a tumor and it will not stop until you make it stop.

Remember that if we don’t fight back, no one else will.

Incel Wiki #quack incels.wiki

Psychiatry
imageimageimageimage

Psychiatry is an instrument of social-control for deviants who aren't in regular jail. In other words, "Society's Sewer". If you deviate from society in any meaningful way and you do not live on your own, expect to meet a psychiatrist at some point in your life.

Metastudies (or studies of studies) have proven antidepressants, for example, to not be clinically significant in the treatment of depression beyond placebo,[1][2] but their actual effects have been proven to be quite harmful in the long and sometimes short-term.

Meeting a psychiatrist

Not all psychiatrists are horrible people. However, if you ever hint that you have suicidal or homicidal ideation, they have legal authority to lock you up temporarily, or, "temporarily" (and you don't want that, trust us). In fact, they also need no real evidence. Courts in psychiatric in cases are heavily biased towards parents and doctors. It is therefore helpful to record your psychiatric sessions (legally) if you must attend them. And better yet, not attend them at all.

If you are 18 and over and in good health, and you think you may be forced to see a psychiatrist because people want you on drugs... MOVE. MOVE NOW. Get out of your house now with food and clothing and take an uber to a friend's house or a homeless tent setup (not a homeless shelter, those places now employ psychiatry). You may need to leave a note on social media posting that it was a voluntary decision of yours and you are not a missing person. Your former caretakers now have no legal authority to force psychiatry on you, even if they want to lie to do so.

Even being homeless is better than the decades of mental torture that psychiatric drugs can inflict on you.

Psychiatry and incels

Most incels, when trying to describe their psychic pain about social situations, they will usually be labled as either schizophrenic or socially anxious, depending on how much time the psychiatrist wants to spend evaluating their situation. Given the treatment almost never involves improving in the area of romantic relationships, and harmful drugs are instead prescribed (which often make dating harder), your life starts spiriling downward. Psychiatrists sometimes prescribe SSRIs to incels as anaphrodisiacs, even though SSRIs cause anorgasmia, not reduced libido.

Psychiatrists will rarely acknowledge inceldom as it's own problem which causes illness. However, this is not the main reason to avoid psychiatrists. "Involuntary singeldom", or, "incel", is not a cult (any more than determinism is) and we don't have members. Psychiatry is harmful to *everyone*.

But my friend got better?

The placebo effect is extremely powerful. Sham surgeries have in some cases beaten real surgeries in double-blind trials. Mental and physical states are profoundly influenced by the placebo effect, especially those characterized by a lack of hope. You or your friend may have noticed though that the *actual* clinically meaningful effects of psychotropic drugs (what are usually labeled "side effects") are profound and often extremely damaging. Best to just take sugar pill, as those have been proven to work via placebo, *even if you know it's a placebo*.
Antidepressants fail to meet clinical significance beyond placebo in treating depression

In metastudies of the effectiveness of antidepressants, according to the NICE criteria of clinical significance (more than 4+ points on the HAM-D depression rating scale, or HRDS), there is not one metastudy that shows that antidepressants are clinically significant in treating depression beyond placebo.

The latest meta-analysis of anti-depressants, here [1], shows that when compiling the results of many different studies, antidepressants did not produce more than an equivalent of a 4 point improvement on the HRDS, meaning the antidepressants were not clinically meaningful in treating depression beyond placebo.

A look at Irving Kirsches dataset reveals only clinical significance at the tail end of the very severely depressed (about 10% of patients). Which only yields a 4.28 HRDS decrease. Fournier et. al 2010 also only found about 10% of patients pass the NICE criteria for a clinically significant response to antidepressants [2]. Just half an hour of treadmill walking for 10 consecutive days is sufficient to produce a clinically relevant and statistically significant reduction in depression (reduction of 6.5 points from baseline on HRDS).[3]. The exercise part aside, the point is that meta-analyses do not show a clinically significant response to antidepressants with the exception of maybe the top 10% most severely depressed patients. And for them, exercise would even work better.

"Monoamine hypothesis"

The description of the cause of abnormal brain states in psychiatry are based on a pseudoscientific, "monoamine hypothesis", which isn't even considered reputable in top universities anymore. The brain is like a computer, and electrical patterns in your brain's circuitry determine mood. But neurotransmitter pathways are only a very small part of that story, and do not even begin to explain the complexity of our brain circuitry. Synapses are merely the spaces between the circuitry. Trying to figure out how to alter complex electrical activity in the brain (feelings) in a productive manner with neurotransmitter pathways is like trying to figure out the patterns of pipes in your city by yelling into your sink.

[lots of anti-psychiatry video clips]

[Lists of anti-psychiatry organisations and crackpots]

NAMI

NAMI is the most well-known mental patient patient "advocacy" group in the United States. In reality NAMI is a front-group for drug companies, receiving inordinate amounts of their funding from psychotropic drug companies. The group advocates forced drugging and involuntary commitment. A prominent psychiatrist who was a member of the American Psychiatric Association once resigned from the APA citing the group, "being in bed", with NAMI, and being critical of NAMI's support of forced drugging[3]. NAMI was initially funded by the royalities of a book by Dr. E. Fuller Torrey, the nation's lead advocate of forced psychiatric drugging.

[lots of anti-psychiatry video clips]

Fay Voshell #fundie barbwire.com

To look at the bloc of white garbed Democrat women was to look at oracles of Delphi who have mystically discerned the most sacred right of women is the right to sacrifice their own offspring. To look at the high priestesses dedicated to the religion of radical feminism is to see leaders of a cult, the chief sacrament of which is abortion.

For nearly all leftist feminists, abortion is a holy rite, a religious ritual to be conducted in the cathedrals of Planned Parenthood and to be blessed by “faith leaders.”

Jeremy N. Choate #fundie sufficient-reason.tumblr.com

How does your political bent threaten my and my sons personal liberty, you ask? In your irrational attempt to classify things such as clothing, shelter, health care, employment, and income as basic human rights, you are placing a demand upon my time, my treasure, and my talents. If you believe that you have a right to health care, and you are successful in persuading enough shallow thinkers to think as you do, then it will place a demand upon me to provide it to you. If you believe that you have a right to a job, and more than half of America agrees with you, as a business owner, I am obligated to provide one to you, even if it means making my business less profitable.

The fact is, you can rail against my conservatism all you wish. You can make fun of my Tea Party gatherings, and you can ridicule patriots in tri-corner hats until you wet yourself from mirth, but one thing is for certain: my political philosophy will NEVER be a threat to your freedom.
...
Everything that modern liberalism accomplishes is accomplished at the barrel of a government rifle. You do not trust in the generosity of the American people to provide, through private charity, things such as clothing, food, shelter, and health care, so you empower the government to take from them and spend the money on wasteful, inefficient, and inadequate government entitlement programs. You do not trust in the personal responsibility of the average American to wield firearms in defense of themselves and their families, so you seek to empower the government to criminalize the use and possession of firearms by private citizens. Everytime you empower the government, you lose more of your personal liberty — it’s an axiomatic truth.

What angers me the most about you is the eagerness with which you allow the incremental enslavement to occur. You are the cliched and proverbial frog in the pot who has actually convinced himself that he’s discovered a big, silver jacuzzi. Somehow, you’re naive enough to believe that one more degree of heat won’t really matter that much.

I have the utmost respect for a slave who is continuously seeking a path to freedom. What I cannot stomach is a free man who is continuous seeking a path to servitude by willingly trading his freedom for the false sense of security that government will provide.
...
In conclusion, just know that the harder you push to enact your agenda, the more hostile I will become — the harder I will fight you. It’s nothing personal, necessarily. If you want to become a slave to an all-powerful central government, be my guest. But if you are planning to take me and my family down with you, as we say down here in the South, I will stomp a mud-hole in your chest and walk it dry.

Bring it.

CuckedByTRUMP #fundie reddit.com

The left is a cult that can only survive by cutting off information.

I was reading an askreddit thread about people who have left a cult "What was your oh**** moment?" If you go read that thread over there you will see one thing in common in all the cults. You are not allowed to think differently and to stop you from thinking differently they shut off all information from the outside. The left does exactly this. They are trying to silence conservatives to keep information away from their followers in the cult. If you think any unapproved thoughts you will be shunned from the group.

The left is a cult.

Edit: I went to sleep and came back. This post blew up. I am glad people see what the left really is. Also I saw a comment about how it is ironic to post this in a sub that censors leftists. What a ridiculous contradiction. We are on a completely leftist platform that censors right leaning subs, has special rules for our sub only, and removes gun subreddits. We are literally in the belly of the beast and you cult members want to come in to every single thread and try to brainwash us with your cult crap. Sorry but we are turning away the door knockers. We are here to try and save the people you are brainwashing. We are trying to pull people out of your cult. No we don't need to hear your 5000th anti-Trump post for the day here. You have a thousands subs to discuss that on. We have one. You have even taken over conservative subs in the past. If you want to argue your point of view go to askthe_donald. We have a dedicated sub for discussion.

Fun fact: Democrats also are far more likely to have mental health issues.

Fun fact: People in cults also are far more likely to have mental health issues.

http://archive.is/8SYYC

Thus, cults can be seen as an organized group or a solitary person whose purpose is to dominate cult members by using psychological manipulation and pressure strategies.

Cruelcel #fundie reddit.com

The normie program for bullying incels at every stage of life

age 5-10: Bully incels for being ugly, laugh, point, call them names, shove them into the dirt, etc. Do everything you can to get the incel to become a withdrawn, weird kid.

age 11-14: Pull fun 'pranks' like fooling an incel into believing a chick likes him and then shattering his ego in public. Slap books out of his hand, give him swirlies, etc. Gang up and tell lies about him so he gets in trouble with adults. Hopefully the incel winds up with PTSD, a sever stutter, or other fun things.

age 16-22: Exclude the incel from every formative experience there is, from parties to dating to simple socializing. Do this because he is awkward and weird and lacks social skills (due to you and yours bullying and isolating him for his entire life). If you are forced to interact with him, make sure you are rude and unpleasant towards him, because he is bothering you (by existing). Conveniently forget everything you have ever done to anyone like him in the past. You are a normie - a good person.

age 23+: get bored of not bullying incels. Find out where they post online, barge in on them, or create communities devoted to mocking them. Make a few troll accounts to show how they have "extreme" beliefs so you can justify your attacks on them. If an incel ever complains about anything, tell him it is his fault for being awkward, weird, lacking social skills, and for being full of anger and misogyny. Why would he be angry after all? It's not like you bullied, excluded, ridiculed, beat him up, etc for most of his life. You are a normie. A good person.

some incels #sexist reddit.com

Re: PSA: Trannies are organizing on Discord to recruit vulnerable youngcels into their weird feminization cult. Please upvote this so people are made aware

image

(RareRaspberry6)
i don't like transphobia, almost all of them ended up like that because they were too ugly to get a gf just like everyone else on here, and no one in their friends circle (if they even had one) or family intervened to help them, they are victims. this is why almost all transexuals are male-to-female and not the other way around. that's just what happens when you're male and society rejects you for no reason. you end up developing weird interests and killing yourself at age 30.

don't bully them please. they are suffering

(sodomcel)
a lot of people that get sucked into this shit tend to be retards. it's pretty obvious trannies are trying to get as many young males into becoming trannies themselves because it reinforces their fucked up view of themselves and further emboldens their equally fucked up abomination of existence. trying to make yourself into a trap isn't going to change your genetics and that "man gut" is coming one day

(Toxic_Manlet)
I love how they use hyper feminine cartoon characters to depict themselves. No, you look like a bunch of trannies, some of you balding ffs. I mean if you could actually become an real woman I’d even consider it as an alternative to roping, if only to mess with simps and orbiters

(shattered_dome)
Feminization is a massive fetish in anime adjacent communities and this is all the trans-cult is, a group of people with a predatory fetish that somehow managed to to gaslight mainstream culture in to shielding it. Imagine if any other weird fetish, like those people who swim in septic tanks for example, managed to get the support of mainstream media and big corporations?

This is what you need to keep in mind when you talk to trans people, especially MtF who have any interest or past with anime. You are talking to a victim who will most likely seek to reenact their trauma on another.

(PvtJamesRyan)
I feel like I’m living in the twilight zone ever since I discovered the incel community, just seeing all the incel theories, even the craziest, proven true one by one. First, we had the crazy incel theories about how lesbianism is largely a charade and lesbians would turn straight for chad. We got absolutely slaughtered on Reddit for this theory. Then an inceltears defector posted a crazy study showing that lesbians were twice as likely to get pregnant than straight women, thus proving incels right and BTFO ever single Redditor. Next we had incels talking about how transvestism is just caused by gynocentricity and men just wanting to enjoy female privilege. Incels got rubbished again on Reddit because we dared to suggest women were privilege. Now it appears we have been proven right again. I am not kidding, I think incels May be the smartest people alive on earth today.

What worries me is that incels have a couple of apocalyptic theories of how the world would turn out, and judging from their flawless track record, these would probably come true. Let us never forget that incels predicted metoo months before it happened. For those who remember r/incels, there was a series of threads where incels predicted women would go en masse on social media to accuse normies who touches them in the past for raping them because all forms of contact by an ugly Male is rape. Inceltears went on a ramalage calling incels paranoid and that “normal people don’t accuse people of rape just because they ugly you just have a toxic mindset reeeee”. A few months later, the metoo phenomenon was born.

(blackpilloverdose)
The frustration builds and the sadness creeps but unless you have been feeling like this since childhood you are just being lied to

By your own doing

Few of them are able to become the women they desire because unless you do hormones since before puberty you can’t be a believable woman that can wear anything in the stores most women want to shop in

At best you are imitation crab meat when what you really need to be is the real deal and you can’t

They will never look like the girl they desire to be

(Not_Always_A_Menace)
Disgusting. Trannies are fucked in the head. I can’t believe society is trying so hard to grovel at their feet and at the same time force acceptance of them into everyone else. And it’s all in the name of...what? Being “progressive?” Fuck that noise. This isn’t progressive. It’s regressive.

It’s only going to get worse from here.

(BrazilianNigma)
I don't know who is the ultimate mindmaster behind this but this is another way to fuck with real men. I just found out a while ago that transgenders were dating straight men (some of whom were """transphobic"""") who obvs didnt know that they were dating a mutilated man. This is what we have to look forward to if we even have a remote chance of ascending, not only are we competing for the ugliest, lowest actual female scraps any vaguely attractive foid we might find has a high chance of being male. It's over. It's fucking over

thanks for the heads up tho, most high iq posters here won't fall for that shit. It's probably the faggots at cucktears who are more likely to be trans

(Take_Me_Back_Please)
they honestly are delusional if they think they look like those anime girls in real life. most of these "traps" cover up their faces and filter-up when they take photos because deep down they know they still look like an ugly dude in drags

99% of all traps are UGLY!

(Blanketfish)
Not that Trans are my cup of tea. But one thing I find funny is that MtF trans can get money for webcamming, dominate sports, even fucking win beauty pageants. Proving that being a woman is easy mode. As for FtM, they learn how fucking hard it is to be a man, the are even generally manlets, dickcels (obvious), and framecels.

(droppedmyvcard)
If I could actually become an actual real woman with two X chromosomes and a vagina and a womb then I would. I would switch to easy mode midway through the game because the game sucks and is stacked against me.

But it is not possible. I have no desire to mutilate my genitals, have a fake "vagina" that is a constantly bleeding pus-filled wound that is forever trying to close, a masculine skeleton and facial structure, deep voice, Adam's apple, big feet, etc. The research shows that post-op transexuals are not any happier, and the rate of suicide goes up.

I think it's really sad how many are being misled by our feminized society into ceasing being men, but not really becoming women either, just becoming these sad depressed mutilated people who are in-between genders and have even less chance of finding love because neither gay men nor straight women want them, with a few exceptions.

No offence...

(TheRealUncleRuckus)
I like trannies. Honestly, I think trannies are hotter than cisgender females. I just wish they were proincel rather than antiincel. In the tranny lover community we have a saying that, every single female in the future will have a dick. This is because when there will be technology to be able to produce a babe from two sperm and outside the uterus, no one will want a dick-less girl.

Incel331 #sexist reddit.com

Final Decision: Femails **are** evil people because

They claim that sex is 'fun and feels good' yet there are still incels out who are dying because of lack of sex. It's not like a woman actually has to give something up or endure pain (no woman is virgin) to have sex with an incel. It's basically fun in exchange for fun. They only do it for chads and make sure to unmatch non chads on tinder and ghost incels in person and online. There's really no argument to go on. I don't expect any comments on this post, since women are evil people by this logic.

MillimetersOfBone & ShahOfShinebox #sexist #transphobia reddit.com

[Note: They are commenting on a video titled "8th place: A high school girl's life after transgender students joined her sport", posted by The Daily Signal, a website operated by the right-wing organization The Heritage Foundation]

Re: This roastie crying about not winning anymore, JFL - Life fuel!!!

(MillimetersOfBone)

It's so fun watching feminism eat itself with this whole trans thing.

It's a battle between entitIed women who want to be coddled because of their holes, and virtue signalers who are willing to cuck themselves into oblivion to seem as "accepting" and "tolerant" as possible. And the virtue signalers are winning.

Now, all of the sudden, men in wigs with abs and dicks are flooding into women's locker rooms, and unsurprisingly dominating in women's sports. Women are slowly losing all of their special privileges to trannies and they have to either plug their ears and pretend these men are women, or speak the truth and get shut out by their friends, lose their jobs, and be banned from public life.

Just goes to show, sometimes you get lucky and the 🤡🌎 hits the wrong target.

(ShahOfShinebox)

Honestly I’m a huge supporter of trans people in sports

It makes no difference to men if trans men join their sport, and the minute they have a trans woman vs woman boxing match here in LA I’ll be happily buying a ticket because that will be some hilarious shit

Incel Wiki #fundie wiki.incels.info

Battle of Incelistan

The Battle of Incelistan (mid-2016 - 7 November 2017) was a war fought in Reddit grounds between the Incel side and the SJW side, which was composed by r/incelwatch, r/inceltears, the majority of reddit and it's admins. It was one of the biggest Reddit conflicts, only surpassed by the r/jailbait controversy. The odds were against the Incel side since the beginning, but that didn't stop them from defending their safe haven until the very end.

The starting date of this war is often debated, some historians say that it began once the incelsphere became widely known, where as other historians prefer to use the date when the first incel watchgroup was created, named r/incelwatch (which went private after the creation of r/inceltears). Regardless, the agreed date is vaguely regarded as mid-2016.

To this day a peace treaty hasn't been signed between the two sides and some people believe that the war still continues.

Background

After the controversial subreddit r/truecels was quarantined by the cuckmins, many incels either roped or began searching for another home. The original r/incels subreddit was created in 2015, but it remained inactive until July 2016. It must be noted that another subreddit named r/incel (without an "s") existed, but it was an over-the-top satire subreddit that was banned within months.

The Incel side faced several logistical issues that limited their fighting potential: lack of allies, fatigued from weeks of LDAR and a dangerous lack of blackpill artillery.

SJW offensive

The main fighting style of the SJW's involved mass-downvoting, mass-reporting and using automated bot accounts to repeat said processes. This strategy was proven successful as the Incel side did not have any countermeasures. This meant that all posts on r/incels had an abysmal upvote to downvote ratio and many comments were buried and hidden due to a high amount of downvotes.

Brigading

Another strategy which proved successful involved thousands or at the highest ever recorded 12k lurkers from other subreddits visiting r/incels at one given time. This caused the subreddit to go private and retreat and as a result losing control of captured cities and enemy camps. However, during this time incel troops had time to rest and have peaceful conversations with each other. While the subreddit was private r/inceltears often deployed spies and infiltrators to gather information, the most well known of them, named u/LookismIsReal, was captured and executed by Incel authorities. Their profile is terminated as of today.

Casualties

The SJW side was composed by millions of plebbit users and many cuckmins ready to pulverize r/incels in the snap of a finger, the Incel side had at its peak 45k troops which lacked military training and firepower. As a result the Battle of Incelistan was a decisive SJW victory since the beginning.

While the exact number of casualties vary widely, historians estimate that 43,000 incel citizens were publically executed, 500 were captured, around 500 missing and 1000 went into exile. Public incel figures such as the Supreme LeaderTM azavii, admincels and modcels were tortured for public entertainment and thrown in a ditch. Autobot was captured and re-programmed by SJW engineers.

The SJW side didn't suffer any casualties.

Result

In 3 November 2017 r/incels went private for the last time. It lasted four painful days where many legitimate incels couldn't enter due to being suspended by prior ban waves.

In the morning of 7 November 2017 a nuclear bomb was dropped in the town center of Incelistan, resulting in the total annihilation of the region and leaving the entire country severely irradiated and unfit for human population.

Surviving incels were forced to rebuild the empire from scratch. By this time plebbit banned all subreddits that had any correlation to inceldom, including r/1ncels, r/IncelBrotherhood, r/IncelsPurgatory, r/LonelyNonViolentMen and lastly r/truecels. Somehow r/braincels survived.

The construction of a new empire called incels.me was started weeks before the nuking and was inaugurated in 8 November 2017.

Alex Jones #conspiracy rightwingwatch.org

Alex Jones’s InfoWars network posted a video clip today of Jones discussing same-sex marriage, which Jones said he rarely talks about because he considers it a “distraction.”

However, Jones said that he is worried about the attempt to “sexualize children” with books like “Heather Has Two Mommies.” This effort to “target children,” Jones said, represents the “space-cult, suicide-cult, exterminism, craziness” of the United Nations and global elites.

“The eugenics, trans-humanist cult wants to confuse the general species ahead of rendering us down and removing us,” he said. “The plan is an asexual humanoid, even if they decide to keep us around, stated in hundreds of textbooks.”

AJ Castellitto #fundie barbwire.com


On the heels of the most recent (and conveniently-timed) gun-related tragedy, a liberal proudly declares, ?“I’m not against people owning a gun…just crazy people owning guns.”

There is a real practical, even dangerous, problem with this otherwise reasonable sentiment, however. The problem lies directly in the radical ideology of big government progressives, as even the most justified acts of self-defense have come under great scrutiny.

We must see the underlying agenda and realize that if the act of self-defense is vilified, that’s one more excuse (albeit a highly flawed and downright sinister justification) for the government to attempt to take away our guns. Tragically, even our brave and faithful vets are on notice. In our day of confusion and uncertainty, may we humbly and responsibly maintain our right to self-defense.

A nation without God needs special restrictions and policing. The godless need to be monitored and it is the godless who want to do the monitoring. The solution is simple. More God equals more freedom and accountability. When the conscience grows dark both the slaves and the masters pose a great threat to humanity.

RegisterUserName #sexist incels.co

[OP of "[Discussion] SEAmaxxing is overrated, expensive, low quality and takes up a lot of time. What about other "extreme" measures to ascend?"]

Cold approaching is dead.
Online dating was stillborn.

It seems that, if you're white, the only way you can ascend is through going to Asia and fucking some noodlewhore who's desperate for a green card and you seem better than the average ricecel (not cool to cuck ricecels). But that isn't the case.

There are probably dozens of ideas that you've never thought of because, when you can't get what you want with mainstream methods, you have to think outside the box to solutions that have a greater chance of working. I'm talking joining a cult (more of an extreme religion where you can make up some mumbo jumbo that loosely correlates to what a crazy guy wrote to get some girl who also joined to marry you or face damnation, or whatever), entering a mental hospital, homeless people (not betabuxxing, but more of a "you're the first person to care for me; how could I repay you" and then they fall in love with you or something), mental hospitals, going to Alcoholics Anonymous or one of those circle meetings to find someone in a rough patch in life. Things like that is how there's ANY chance to ascend.

You can choose 3 options:

1. LDAR and be a virgin forever. There's nothing inherently wrong with this, and you can be happy if you have copes, but I desire something more out of life;

2. Half heatedly try to do things like "cold approach" and use Tinder, despite them being useless and you know it because you've seen the data yourself. It seems to be like a cope so that you can further reaffirm how over it is. You will not get laid on Tinder nor will you get anything more than a date (if you're fakecel and/or lucky), so why bother with that futile pursuit?

3. Do crazy shit. Step out of society and choose methods that might actually work, because we're not talking about massive sexual marketplaces; we're talking about unconventional shit that can't be quantified like online dating or approaches because they will be highly personal.

It's going to give you something to do and think about and, if you're lucky, you might actually ascend for real, not just a one night stand or whatever. You're probably thinking to yourself, "This seems like a massive scam to make me buy something because you haven't actually told me how to do it." And to that, I say "Eh?" Because I don't know yet either. So help me out.

These are some things I've thought of, just bullet pointed but I can go into detail if you want to talk about it. I'm not going to include SEA because it's already saturated with white guys who are better looking than you, and we want to be thinking properly outside the box, instead of trying to start a rap career with a name starting with "Lil" and expecting to be able to compete; we're going for that African clicking noise genre. Anyways, here are some ideas I can think of off the top of my head:

Alcoholics anonymous or similar meetings (25-40 preferable age range and the ladies will likely be like 20-35)

Cultmaxxing to make your own cult (requirements: must be Ritalincel; nah, but seriously, you have to be able to be very charismatic and preferably not a turbomanlet. Age range for incel would be 28+ I'd say and the girls could be anywhere from 16 (depending on age of consent; obviously don't break the law) to around 25 or so)

Cultmaxxing by leeching on someone else's cult and finding wife, but be careful that a fellow incel hasn't made it into a sex cult where he fucks your wife (doesn't really matter about age tbh, but this is a lot easier but obviously you don't have the power. Just be careful of the leader; he might be a day or something idk so maybe you could arrange not to report him if he made you archbishop or whatever lol)

Helping homeless girl (you gotta have your own house and stuff, preferably be able to fulfill a father like role because she probably had circumstances which led to her never having anyone to be a father) I think I like this one the most because she's not going to become a street whore or anything just to keep affording crack until she's raped and killed eventually; you're actually helping someone so it's the most morally acceptable and you are making a woman who's not a detriment on the system.

Uhhh I'm getting bored but DONT go after those "alternative" girls or whatever, because that's a normie thing and you will have competition. They are high SMV and likely already know that.

Mentalhospitalmaxxing and find some crazy bird

Fight girls' boyfriends and try to hit on them after. You see all those stories man you never know. (Works best if you're young, tall, good fighting success. You can snag teenage girls depending on laws in your area so from around 16-25 where they might just get turned on by it and are drunk and are angry at their boyfriends, but it probably won't be a long term thing ever because, I mean, come on, it's the type of girl to leave her boyfriend for an ugly subhuman because he got beat up)

Anyways, I want to know more ways like this because it might be the only way you can ascend.

Remember, don't do anything illegal because that's not cool! Well, it is, but it's going to maybe get you in prison where people might have ascension methods of their own involving your ass.

justforlulzandkeks #transphobia reddit.com

Re: Daily reminder that most trannies end up looking like this

image

Much worse. and even the ones who manage to put on 100 pounds of mmakeup and can look passable under certain lights, are still easily busted when they show their voice. They always sound like bugs. Imagine what these disgusting creatures look like without the makeup. Disgusting

Daily reminder that these are the chapocels/reddit trannies who tell you to post hog/you're a freak

I was JUST ABOUT to make some fukn lunch, and you ruined it.

umm what are you trying to say? why would your lunch be ruined? those are clearly all beautiful women, and if you dare insinuate that they're not you're obviously just a bigot

👏 WELCOME 👏 TO 👏 2019 👏 GRANDPA

Literally nothing to do with inceldom but ok thank you for posting.

Actually a lot of IT posters are trannies/furries or other types of degenerates. They shit on incels to feel better about themselves and because "fighting misogyny" means they're "real women"

Literally everyone shits on incels, with the majority being fully heterosexual born women, dont see the need to single out transexuals.

It's just a friendly reminder of who is calling you a loser on reddit and that there's a good chance they're beneath you

Imagine being on a subreddit about how people get judged for their looks and then proceeding to judge people by their looks

Let the tranny be, as long as it doesn’t affect me let it do what it wants

This tranny threw a fit in a gamestop store because he was called sir

He's already affected the public, no reason he wouldn't affect you as well

Ohhh noooo! Someone through a fit in a gamestop! The world is gonna end! Better get laid while you still can. Oh wait...

was this supposed to be an insult? LMAO

Various Incels #sexist #transphobia incels.co

RE: [JFL] Why the fuck do female to male transgenders even exist. Wtf are these retards thinking

(pyromancer1234)

Seriously lmfao. I'm not saying I want to be one, but I can at least see why some men decide to "become women". Why the fuck would a woman want to become a man though?! Where the fuck is the logic in that? Especially considering they're just going to be like a 5'5" subhuman man anyway lmao?

Logic and women...pick one. Seriously though, FTM regret is one of the great life-fuels. It doesn't take long for an FTM to realize how much more privilege the average woman has than the average man.

(soymonkcel)

Lmfao true, will definitely read a few of these posts. Truly hilarious shit. They thought they would become Chad. Literally threw away a tutorial mode life in exchange for living life as a short, weak male. COMICALLY stupid.

"I want to be myself again. I want the world to see me for what I am. I want other women and lesbians to recognize me as their sister, because I am. I miss my connections with women. No amount of hormones or surgery could ever replace the friendship and company of women."

Bingo.

(The Abyss)
They believe the male privilege larp.

They can't be that stupid:waitwhat:

Oh but they can, look at the human race locked into a cycle of servitude as a wage slave while others have the entirety of a country's GDP as their net worth yet we do nothing.

(Starcel)
It's retarded because you get 5'2 foids who make fun of short men on twitter everyday, yet they transition into a male despite them loathing short men. It's like a klan member painting his skin brown.

(Guykild)
Many of them try to change back after getting blackpilled and learning a guy's life isn't easy. The media don't talk about those though as it's against both agendas about transitioning and how women have it worse than men.

GayLubeOil #sexist reddit.com

A lot of people come here, subscribe, and start participating without giving a serious thought to what the Red Pill metaphor means. We have a lot of cool Red Pill art, banners and symbolism. Yet hardly anyone bothers to figure out what it all means. Why? Because most people are brain dead zombies incapable and highly averse to complex thought. People would rather enact a predesigned narrative (Matrix) then independently respond to life's stimulus.

By using the Matrix metaphor we're claiming that The Red Pill can only function via uncompromising rejection of the Blue Pill. Only with full rejection are you free of Blue Pill influence and capable of truly acting freely. The Matrix film makes this point very clear, which is why we chose to use the metaphor in the first place. There are no half measures here. In other words if you're making posts about acting like an asshole without being an asshole or are concerned with what the vagina person will think of your Red Pill reading, you are a loser and an imbecile. You have failed to comprehend the meaning of Red Pill. You lack the capacity to participate and should fuck off to less intellectually demanding activities like Sports Ball, Game Of Normies and navel gazing.

How does total rejection work in the real world? Let's say for whatever reason you are being shit-tested. Some mindless vagina drone is flapping non-sequiturs out of her labia. What she's saying doesn't logically make sense and isn’t factually representative of what happened. All of the symptoms of a shit test. So before you open your mouth and keep frame, you begin by holding the emphatic belief that all women are illogical emotional child people. 99% of the time they're either hungry, sleepy or need a time out. Nothing a woman says matters by virtue of it being said by a woman. It is with this mindset of absolute chauvinism, that you should enter or refuse to enter the interaction.

Likewise the same methodology can and should be applied when dealing with women and dick-women who aggregate themselves into political movements. Feminism, Egalitarianism, Antifags, namely any ideology not comprised of macho macho men. You wouldn't argue with the Alzheimer's crew at the nursing home. So why are you concerned with the ravings of some freak who doesn't believe in gender, due to a lifelong hormonal imbalance? Occasionally societies like to make crazy people feel important by listening to them. The Greeks did it with the Oracles. Now the West is doing it with Gender Studies dykes. Your Gender Studies professor admires Che and Fidel, however if they were alive today they would gladly execute her for being a maricón. Postmodern art painted with 9mm onto a brick wall. Anyone who admires their executioners is bat shit crazy. Don't argue with them, smile and nod just like the nursing home. Emphatic Rejection.

This brings me to my last point. If you don't emphatically reject the Blue Pill, you are going to have a very bad time. In the operating room of life you are cutting with a dull scalpel. Children, women and the mentally feeble don't understand the world, so they must rely on social cues. They are the stupid kid in class who has no idea what's going on. They might not know anything about calculus, but they can definitely copy off the smart kid. Their understanding of the world is based off of others reaction to it. They are inherently dependent people. They need to test those around them in order to know who to depend on. The more you compromise with their stupidity the more they will believe in their own stupidity and in turn, the more stupidity you will have to deal with. Explaining to a child why she doesn't need the candy bar is just an invitation for more childish bullshit.

The truth is radical, it's not democratic. If the sky is blue and 99% of the population believes it to be yellow, compromising and saying that it's green isn't helping anyone, least of all you. We live in a feminist Cuck-Fag society that promotes a Cuck-Fag dating strategy and a don't offend anyone morality. The Red Pill is an emphatic rejection of both. Going half Cuck-Fag isn't going to help you. There is nothing noble about compromising with idiots. You have to go all the way. That's what the Red Pill is all about.

Various Incels #sexist #transphobia incels.co

RE: [JFL] Tranny hole mutilates her vagina and tries to become a man. Now notices she's become a truecel freak of nature and wants to kill herself jfl.

(UglySlav)

hahahahah tell her to get a better personality
this is exactly why supporting the lgbt non sense is NOT morally correct because by supporting this behaviour youre encouraging SUICIDE jfl
people were encouraging this woman to mutilate her vagina and thought its the moral thing to do
i mean dont get me wrong im happy this tranny will rope but just want to prove that supporting lgbt is not normal and its degenerate.

(Higgscel)

Yet another case of the awful tranny mentality of just "mutilate urself".
Guess what, your sex is decided when you're incubating in a foid, and no matter how much surgery or pills you take. You'll either a gaping hole, graphed flesh, and nobody ever "passes".

(slavcel11)

That's what liberal propaganda combined with the bluepill can do to you, holy fuck. I almost mustered a tiny bit of pity specifically for her, but timely woke up to who she is. Disgusting, hypocritical foid npc who happened to have so puny shit of a brain to even believe the lies she'd set up for us poor incels herself. Burn in hell, damnable bitch. You have well earned every bit of your plight.

She even calls a height of 5'4 "unnaturally impossibly ridiculously short". Well, have fun with it, stupid bitch. Enjoy your average manlet life and remind yourself that the height of the whole asian population fluctuates somewhere around that mark.

"I feel like a stupid asshole trying to call myself a man. I hate myself more and more every day. I’ll never know what sex is like, and therefor what love is like, never know what a real life is like."

Oh, you don't say? Could she imagine that somewhere, maybe even in her city or on her street, might've lived a man who thought of himself just like that? That he too would never know what love is like just because of few inches or millimeters of bone? She's just irredeemable, glad she now knows what it is like to be an incel.

Some Pinkpillers #sexist #psycho reddit.com

RE: Is it something wrong with male children now too?

(Consider_The_Horses2)

There absolutely is something wrong with male children. And this something is not just caused by socialization but - at least partly - also by their male biology. Young boys very clearly exhibit the desire to fight, to dominate, and to destroy whom they consider beneath them. It is not uncommon for young boys to rape and abuse - their sisters, for instance. https://i.redd.it/mkwy8ufokm051.jpg Men have basically evolved to rape and kill and male children are already practicing. And these days, they start watching rape porn and calling women "sluts" and "thots" online when they are 10 or 11-years-old already, anyway...

Personally, I've come to hate male children just as much as I hate men: https://www.reddit.com/r/BlackPillFeminism/comments/gnuqgl/ive_come_to_hate_boys_just_as_much_as_i_hate_men/

They should be thaugth to be more friendly

Women are always expected to "help" males and to sacrifice themselves in order to raise males. I am opposed to this. It hasn't worked out in the past, and it won't work out in the future. The only thing it has resulted in - the only thing this argument was designed for - was to make women responsible for the bad actions of men and make women sacrifice their time, their energy, their well-being to "help" the very males who want to oppress and rape them.

You adult men, you go ahead and teach boys not rape, not to objectify women, not to watch porn, not to glorify prostitution, not to oppress women, not to "slut-shame" them, etc.

You know most men in the world wont rape you. "Helping" boys is raising them. Do it right with other people. Give them a positive influence. Teach them about normal feminism and not radical. Let them know how they should be treated and how to treat women.

Normal feminism is nothing but misogyny. Men define "normal" feminism as a feminism that allows them to continue all the shit they've done for centuries - but this time using "woke" rather than Christian vocabulary to justify it.

No it's not misogyny. Normal feminism as that guy said is woman's rights, to become equal to males. Not to kill them all and become a species that will very quickly become extinct because females won't evolve without males. Feminists from the past are the people who got you the rights you have today. So don't dis them because you shouldn't deserve what they gave their life for.

The goal is female liberation from male oppression, not "equality" with rapists, murderers, pedophiles, and oppressors.

(censorshipment)

A chilling story about two 10 year old boys who kidnapped, tortured, raped and murdered a 2 year old toddler for fun. One of them was arrested as an adult later due to possession of CP(shocker). [NSFW] - https://np.reddit.com/r/BlackPillFeminism/comments/h84ulp/a_chilling_story_about_two_10_year_old_boys_who/

I did not know that. I personally think not every 10yr old boy have the instinct to murder and torture young kids. But, What do i know. I can only speak of my experience when i was 10yrs old

The best way to prevent males from harming females is sex-based separation.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shooting_of_Kayla_Rolland

6 year old boy shot and killed a 6 year old girl at school because she rejected him. Could've been prevented if schools weren't integrated. Sure, you can say could've been prevented if his uncle didn't have guns in the house. But it's just better to separate females from males.

But doesnt females harm males aswell? Think about hoe much more boeing life would become without males. Basically forcing everyone to be lesbian.

Not at the same rate as males who harm females. Heterosexuality is a disease. Women need to evolve.

So you say avery woman on the planet is superior to men?

Fuck off.

(CloacaDiddler)

Boys 10-12 have higher rape statistics than every age of women. Just the preteens. I can barely even retell the story of Junko Furuta kidnapped by a few 14 year old boys and put through the worst torture imaginable for months until she finally died of her injuries. Not to mention little boys tend to be violent, unruly, and show affection by hitting.

You people are deranged. Fuck you and your campaign to feminize little boys. Boys are different than girls, they're not supposed to be these little quiet robots that you shove information into. They're learning machines, they're exploring their environment as all babies do. Just because they're more prone to being unruly (mostly due to the uneven distribution of ADHD among the two sexes), does not mean they are inherently evil.

Citing rare instances of boys doing horrible things is fucking nuts and you know it, I can easily find female equivalents. You people need to delete this sub or honestly just rope, there is no hope for leeches on society who sit on reddit and hate on men, deranged idiots.

Rare instances???

Yes dumbass. Are you really implying that all boys rape someone when they're a preteen?

Why is it all or nothing with you guys.

I’ve already stated that boys between 10-12 rape more people than all age categories of women do...that’s not all, but that’s not rare and it’s so hilarious when y’all try to refute this. Just like how men make up about 24% of teachers nationally but 78% of student sex crimes. Because y’all always love to say how “women rape students just as much as men” but no, they fucking don’t. Women don’t X anything as much as men, not all of them do horrible things but way more do than women do

That's because of the toxic culture that implies young boys should enjoy sex from older women. All the sex scandals from my highschool were exposed not because of reporting, but because someone else found out. Usually it's the parents.

The same way there used to be stigma around women reporting sexual assaults (which is now mitigated by all the awareness movements; sexual assault cases against men have skyrocketed), there is also a stigma against male victims. Once that is broken there will be a surge of reports on female rapists.

But you toxic fuckers make that impossible with your "male violent and bad, woman innocent and pretty amd good" mindset. What a bunch of narcissistic and uneducated jack-offs.

I couldn't count the amount of second-hand embarassment I got whilst reading posts/comments where "pink pilled" psychos were circle jerking about female superiority. And you know what's funny? Mens rights subs don't allow misogyny, yet misandry is the basis of all feminist subs. What an embarassment honestly...

Jesus Christ feminists are the ones against all rape, I’ve only ever heard men encourage students to get with adult teachers. Even had a coworker speak up unprompted to tell me how he believed men could never be raped unless the woman was ugly, and that students were lucky to get with a teacher. If you think it was “just one guy” and are blind to the massive culture of men especially online who feel this way, then obviously you must not believe that all women are the ones supporting this, isn’t that right?

Various incels #sexist incels.co

(Lonelycel)
[JFL] "Ex-incel" posts on inceltears: "I escaped inceldom by transitioning to a female"

Personally, I think this is a massive troll.

But JFL at the comments, they think it's real.

This is proof that IT are negative IQ

Read just the last 2 paragraphs if it's too long for you

(AlwaysLawRoute)
The fact that becoming a "female" gives you thousands of positive points to the eyes of society proves how highly overrated foids are,so many men don't want to be men anymore because the rules are rigged in favour of the """"opressed """"" gender.

(MarriedAndLookin4Fun)
Jesus I hope that's a troll. Trannies need to get killed by firing squads, hundreds of them at a time

(RegisterUserName)
Trannies are a black pill in themselves; you cannot be happy as a male, so become a female. It's just accepting that females have astronomically easier lives.
Fucking LARP either way...

(Mainländer)
That's exactly what (((they))) want you to do. Become a faggot or a crazy person who thinks he is the opposite sex of what he really is because of circumstances created by (((they))) themselves.

(Life Wasted)
Lol they dare not question a tranny, if you larp as a trap the left will bow to you like you are God.

Yeah but there's no way IT would ever acknowledge foids have it easier tho.

(Sans)
My opinion on this is like a double edged sword. I don’t think it’s normal and all but at the same time I’m a bit happy for an Incel who does that to get female privilege. However, this tranny became a cucktear so I have no sympathy.

(MSCW)
That's what they do with vulnerable people.
I hope for that man he is trolling.

(Dregster666)
This piece of shit didn't escape inceldom. It's worst than escortcelling or plastic surgery, this faggot completely overhauled his body of work for validation instead of embracing what he truly was.

Disgusting.

(Marquis de Sade)
Naw it doesnt. I dunno where u live. But here trannys face a life of being openly mocked, ridiculed and avoided. If some tranny walked into the pub an tried to hit on a guy. It would probably get the shit kicked out of it. They are an abomination, and no amount of postive press about them will make me thing otherwise.

(anon2719)
I know many trans people who were former incels in the speedrunning community so I can believe. I still think all trannies should be put to death though

(ovrload)
being a tranny is a cope because you know your pathetic genes are worthless as a male so they try and transition to becoming a female which never works out.

Class A #fundie npr.org

You quit (as IF you were ever a member) when it became clear that the NRA supported gun-owners CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS...

And you oppose them. Fine.
Guess you never heard of the 2nd Amendment. Or the Constitution, for that matter.
:-D


Re: "If this were about rights" It is.
Re: "you'd be up in arms (so to speak) about "God" getting printed on all the money" No...but it seems you are.
Re: "a "speedy trial" taking years" Depends on the reason.
Re: "fines as punishment" No.

It seems that you're just glad that "gun control"-- your hobby, or coping mechanism, or symbol of strength or whatever--is back in the news for a few weeks.

If you want to amend the Constitution, go for it. I wonder how many other parts of the Bill of Rights will be lost...


But violence IS aided and abetted by gun-controllers and and their "gun free zones" like the Pulse nightclub. We need to make "gun free zones" illegal.

The "gun free zone" is the mass-murderer's best friend. All 12 of the worst "mass shootings" in the US occurred in "gun free zones", just like the Pulse nightclub. "Gun free zones" make attractive soft targets for terrorists and mass-murderers, as they gather LOTS of unarmed victims all together for the murderers' safety and convenience.

"Gun free zones" are a cancer on America. In these days of terrorist attacks, they are a national security risk.

We should pass a law that says no "gun free zones" are allowed UNLESS--as at airports--the venue provides sufficient security to keep out armed criminals. It makes no sense to disarm the law-abiding in a "gun free zone", and then just let armed criminals walk right in and begin murdering.

Ollie #fundie google.no

The average beta does not know of the Venusian arts, and he is adrift in a harsh sea of confusion, begging to take any way out. He does not understand why he cannot succeed, has given up, and is thankful for the few scraps he gets – because in his mind it is never, ever, going to get any better. This helplessness and hopelessness is a lot like what those in cults (who routinely do amazingly self-abasing things you or I would laugh at) feel. The only difference is that this cult, the cult of feminism, is heavily supported by the academic, political and media establishment. If Scientology got half the support that the fembots did, it would be THE dominant religion in America. The fembot message is ever-present and almost-inescapable – a lie repeated so often it is the de-facto truth for so many. That’s why so many MRM types like to use the whole “red pill” analogy. The fembot program is so ubiquitous that average man is totally, cluelessly immersed in it, like the matrix, and he needs an external, Morepheus-type character to help him snap out.

Mack Major #sexist facebook.com

Just ranting a bit...

Modern society, especially the creation of feminism, has made people extra crazy! Notice how the rise in mental illness coincides with the rise in modern feminism? Do you honestly think that's accidental or a coincidence?

Women are literally losing their minds trying to keep up with men on everything. And men are losing their minds too trying to accommodate them. What do you think has led to so much sexual confusion and gender incertitude?

Modern feminism has thrown everything into a quandary: women, men, families, homes, children, the economy, religion, politics, education, laws, government - everything.

Even the sports industry has been politicized with the fake women's rights issue! I get tired of tuning into the sports channel just to see the obligatory female personage sitting on a panel of men, like she's there to babysit the fellas: because after all, we're not allowed to have anything without women's permission, right? Not even sports!

And how exactly does that help women's equality anyway???

*Newsflash: Men tune into sports to get away from women - not to be smothered by them there too! It's our one little world away from feminism. At least until now.

Now we have athletes running around wearing pink sneakers and ribbons talking about breast cancer; regardless of the fact that most men suffer and die from prostate cancer; a type of cancer that women aren't even effected by. Society itself has gone mad!

But this is all a carefully orchestrated effort to award SINFUL women a superior - not equal status in society. And that's really the key - sin. Because godly women would find contentment with playing the role assigned to their gender by birth. A mass movement away from that is nothing short of social engineering on a demonic level! And behind this is something far more nefarious.

As society bends and caters to the class of women who covet after the perceived power that men have, society will continue to devolve into a state of utter degeneracy that threatens its very existence.

Various Incels #sexist #racist #transphobia incels.co

RE: [JFL] IT cuckold from Facebook telling us to love ourselves we're not ugly forever!

(insanus virginem)

image

to this day, the most accurate portrayal of my own transgender psychosis i've ever seen was in Silence of the Lambs. as a teenager, i would compulsively draw dismembered female bodies. i was obsessed with the female form, desperately recreating it over and over, imagining myself living inside that skin. and then my shame would lead me to ritualistically dismember that body on the page, piece by piece, with me still inside it.

IT nigger is a mentally ill tranny, figures. BTW trannies and faggots in general have not been the "oppressed" class for at least 20 years so just lol at this fagget. The average trannyfaggot has a much easier time at getting laid than we do

(soymonkcel)
Still, there are a lot of trannies who have it real hard. It is not that much better, believe me. You have to really (at least almost) pass as cis to do good.

(BlkPillPres)

Jesus fucking christ. That thing will kill some femoid someday, if it hasn't killed yet.

This Also good signature, like I've also pointed out masculinity has been feminized, so all these incels going around the forum complaining about "not feeling loved" and that "they'd refuse sex if they thought the woman didn't love them for them" are just indoctrinated men raised with a culture of feminized masculinity, what a woman thinks of you doesn't matter, what you can get from her does

(TheLastSorrow)
Reminder that these abominations are the "sensible" ones JFL.

(TheNEET)
niggas really get high on estrogen, cut off their dick and obsess with dismembering foids and then go and tell us we're violent psychopaths who need to be locked up for using mean words like "foid" or "tranny"

(grondilu)
As a teenager, I was obsessed with the female form, too. But I was jerking off from it, I wasn't imagining dismembering it. But I guess I'm the deranged one, right ?

Julian Vigo #sexist feministcurrent.com

In an effort to move to a greener existence, I recently switched to an ecological toothbrush. As I have been living uniquely from solar panels for almost two years, I was forced to ditch my electric toothbrush. In choosing an ecological toothbrush, I studied materials, as well as the advantages of recycled plastic brushes versus those with replaceable heads. In the end, I had to eliminate every single option aside from the single one I chose. Yes, I had to exclude that which did not meet my personal standards and convenience.

I think a lot about exclusion these days. The #MeToo campaign which emerged in reaction to the sexually aggressive acts of Harvey Weinstein is clearly a female-centered campaign. But recently I’ve seen arguments that #MeToo should be extended to include males. While being “inclusive” of everyone might seem like a nice idea, the reality is that there are perfectly rational reasons for exclusivity in many situations. Our shared experiences with certain humans help us form bonds where and when we need them. These bonds can often make life bearable for those experiencing particularly painful moments in their lives. Commonalities help to create community. The truth is that all communities are exclusive, in one way or another, of individuals who don’t share certain experiences or requisites. While some might be tempted to argue exclusion equates to segregation, such arguments are very much apples and oranges, particularly in the context of women’s rights.

There are several key differences which should be underscored, when discussing “exclusion” in the women’s liberation movement, beginning with the myth that feminism must focus on males. Thanks to liberal feminists like Emma Watson, among others, many women have been made to believe that arguing for the inclusion of males in the women’s movement is a worthwhile cause. But any group in protest of its oppression by another group is within its rights to demand that the oppressor not be included in its organizing. For instance, when labour unions secured the legal right to represent employees in 1935, employers were excluded from the class of employees because it was understood that employers (as well as managers and supervisors) held power over workers. In terms of economic class, it seems that most people are on the same page when understanding which group holds power over another.

Similarly, civil rights advocacy began with the premise that there is social inequality between people of colour and white people, making a necessary distinction between who is being oppressed under white supremacy. Robbing a person of the right to distinguish the oppressor class means that she is barred from speaking about and identifying her oppression.

Nobody expected the Black Panthers to consider the marginalization of KKK members from their organization for good reason. Similarly, no such claim of exclusion was made about the Million Man March in Washington D.C. in 1995, when approximately 400,000 African American men converged en masse in the nation’s capital to engage in teach-ins, worship services, and community organizing. While there was a discussion over the fact that women were excluded, there was also recognition that black men had the right to gather without women to discuss their issues, and this action was largely supported by African American women. Two years later, the Million Woman March was held in D.C. to focus on issues specific to women.

This sort of exclusion is not based in hatred or a desire to do harm. Exclusion is how we decide, like me and my ecological toothbrush choices, what meets our needs. Exclusion is not necessarily about owning a card to an elite club — it is about setting a particular direction for an individual, group, activity, community, and so forth. All social groups exclude in some way. While I am a big believer in reaching over the aisle to dialogue with those responsible for our subordination, I also recognize the need of any group to make decisions within its group before reaching across that aisle.

(..)

Does the fact of breast cancer support groups for women mean that males cannot get breast cancer? Of course not. And there are breast cancer support groups for males. Why? Because males and females experience breast cancer differently. Commonalities between same-sexed bodies are part of the social intimacy that both males and females alike cherish across cultures. Be it in the hammam or the steam room, the hospital ward, or the changing room at the gym, there is intimacy between people of the same sex that provides a space of security and dignity. Females especially value these spaces because the public sphere is not safe for women. Being in a female-only changing room can offer women a needed reprieve from the daily sexualization of their bodies, and from unwanted male attention and judgment.

The issue of “exclusion” has become a touchpoint for the left in recent years. Most notably, we have seen exclusion being derided as bigotry in trans activist circles where women who say they would not feel comfortable with a male in their change rooms, their women’s shelters, or in a women’s prison are labelled transphobic. Yet both these examples come from real life paradigms. In 2007, Vancouver Rape Relief Society won a case against Kimberly Nixon, a trans-identified male who had attempted to join the training group for peer counsellors at the women’s shelter.

Nixon was asked to leave the group account of having been born male, and because the shelter operated on the basis that women could best counsel other women, having had the specific experience of growing up female under patriarchy. The B.C. Court of Appeals’ decided that Vancouver Rape Relief had the right to determine its own membership, as any oppressed group of people has the right to “discriminate” when organizing in their own interests, as a class. Currently pending in Texas is the case of three female inmates who are suing Federal Medical Center Carswell in Fort Worth, claiming that, “They are living in a degrading and dangerous environment by being forced to share showers and bathrooms with the transgender inmates.” The truth is that, for most women, sex does matter. What is more remarkable is that males who claim to have an internal “female identity” have zero compassion for or comprehension of the reality women face in a male supremacist world, and would prefer women put aside their own material reality, comfort, and safety in order to validate men’s feelings.

Choosing a female gynecologist or desiring a female-only space for changing is not meant to incriminate all males as, to paraphrase George W. Bush, “evil doers.” Rather, a woman might choose a female gynecologist both because she feels a woman would better understand her body, but also because she feels safer in that vulnerable state with someone statistically unlikely to assault them. Women’s desire to change in a locker room without male-bodied persons would likely be based on something similar, as well as a desire to maintain healthy boundaries that too often go unrespected. In excluding males from female spaces, women are demanding that society accept the healthy boundaries of women, even if, in certain scenarios, males might wish to be on the other side of the line.

Last week, Bustle ran a story arguing that “some members of LGBTQ community feel that the [#MeToo] campaign focuses too strongly on the gender binary and seems to erase nonbinary or genderqueer people from the conversation.” But what this statement really conveys is that males feel excluded from a conversation lead by women speaking out about male violence. While I would not deny that males experience violence, it is overwhelmingly violence inflicted by other males. What makes #MeToo important is that violence against women and girls is coded into the structural social hierarchy. When women contribute their #MeToo stories, they are doing so as females who have, from childhood, been groomed as objects that exist for male use.

It cannot be overstated that females suffer disproportionate levels of sex-based discrimination and violence, including sexual harassment, domestic violence, rape, and trafficking. Women are quite aware that they are discriminated against and physically abused because of their sex, regardless of how they may feel, internally, about the gender roles imposed on them. It is entirely insignificant, for example, how the over 200 women who James Toback sexually harassed identified. To demand that #MeToo include non-binary people is to miss the point of the feminist movement: feminism has from its inception been explicitly about breaking the hierarchy and stereotypes reinforced through gender which demanded women not leave the house, not vote, and not work. It is not the “binary” that is the problem so much as it is gender itself, under patriarchy. Men who rape women don’t care whether their victims feel “binary” or not.

What Bustle would like is for women to use a language that is seemingly more neutral, less politically objectionable, and more inclusive… of males. Otherwise there would be no uproar with focusing specifically on women’s voices and experiences in this campaign. Males insisting on being “included” in women’s social protest against sexism is just more of the same sexism — women are being instructed to shut up about their oppression by males unless they include males. Beyond that, under patriarchy, women are always under pressure to be sexually available to men. This new language of “inclusion” that frames “exclusion” as inherently harmful has led to males who identify as transgender to insist that women include them not only in their groups and politics, but in their beds. That this is explicitly sexist is made clear through the fact that I have yet to see any male who identifies as trans pressure heterosexual men into sleeping with him.

A narrative that insists on coercing or goading women into including their oppressor is anything but progressive. Likewise, insisting that the language of gender neutrality is what matters in a conversation about sexual violence is far from revolutionary. Taking up the five-cent terms like “non-binary” and “queer” will have no impact on the facts of sex-based oppression for females. The challenge we face as a society is not to carpet bomb women’s movements with accusations of “exclusivity” and “bigotry” when women recognize that males and females are different and have different needs. Creating linguistic games might seem avant-garde to undergraduates, but the reality is that gender is what prescribes the behavioral cues engrained in females throughout their lives. Gender is what is hammered into females as a class, rendering them subjects of a discourse they have no power to respond to. The notion that gender can ever be neutral is patently absurd since gender is not the solution. It is the problem.

Changing language to be “be more inclusive” is counter-revolutionary and pretending that such language does anything other prevent women from effectively organizing towards their own liberation is delusory. The language of gender inclusivity does nothing to dismantle the social and political inequalities that females face. It does, however, create a lovely illusion (especially for men who want to seem progressive in their attempts to thwart our movement): that saying “genderqueer” makes one a “feminist.”

Reprobus #sexist incels.co

[JFL] Normies unironically think most incels are cucks

I’ve been looking around the media a lot often, and from what I’ve seen, MANY normies have it mixed up that we are all cucks who will throw away our dignity for a female. I don’t know if it’s the HIGH VISCOSITY of normies masquerading as incels or just fakecels in general. But every time I’ve seen any normie mention us it’s in some asinine statement that makes us seem like cucks. Ignoring the enormous waves of fakecels though, normies legitimately formed us into such a way where they think we’re a bunch of low iq orbiters. They take memes that we have used for years and turn the name from incel to virgin or some shit meanwhile using the rest of our terminology. They are twisting everything we do and say to the point where normies and foids call themselves “incel” for the memes. Fuck normies

chimpburger, AnOminous, et. al. #fundie kiwifarms.net

[Highlights from a conversation about Fundies Say the Darndest Things on Kiwi Farms, where the OP challenged people to "find shit on there and their super spergy posts."]

chimpburgers: Haha these guys again.

They can shove their tranny communist white knighting right back where it came from as far as I'm concerned cause that's what this site looks like to me.

Proof of the blatant communism over there. Their pussy spines crackle when they hear about Trump.

[...]

AnOminous: It used to be actually about fundies. Now it's about them REEEEing at anything that triggers their euphoria and causes their fedoras to fly off.

[...]

NotCobalt: Yeah. But back then they actually made fun of the lulcows, known as fundies. Both sandniggers and jesustards were fair game.

I remember this fag was a huge target:
https://encyclopediadramatica.se/LoneWolf1984

[...]

StarvingAutist: One of the comments linked in the OP called us an "alt-right/GamerGate safe space", probably because he falls into the "if you complain about SJWs then you're a racist" bullshit.

[...]

TimeToTurn: A formerly great site. 2016 Presidential election pretty much finished off everything great about the site. It used to be "Look at some crazy nut on X site", now it's "look at some mean thing a Republican said" and most of the posts were reposts from other left-wing blogs. Once gay marriage got legalised in the US, even the funny homophobia mostly stopped. It's too bad, because there's still tons of exceptional websites run by religious idiots of all faiths, but they'd rather just whine about what Donald Trump did this week. Distind's departure was basically the last straw of the devolution of FSTDT.

Haven't been on there in a while. Don't really feel like it. It was fun being left-wing and being a self-professed authoritarian at the same time, which got me quoted so many times. I just have to play an over-the-top version of what I believe IRL and they would get so triggered. Lots of great discussion was to be had, both from the SJWs freaking out and then the people who were actually semi-intelligent.

My scientific analysis blames this on the fact that FSTDT emerged with the New Atheism movement (along with Rational Wiki and other shit) and as that movement declined into infighting and irrelevance, so did its offspring, which is a reason why Rational Wiki and FSTDT (a proud partner of Rational Wiki) are shite nowadays.

I'm probably reminiscing too much now. Eh, right now I'm about as drunk as I was whenever I'd post there. Thanks for the thread, you Kiwi Farmers, even though I'll regret posting here before long.

@FelineDarkmage

I'm trying so hard right now to see the remnants of good on this site. But TimetoTurn does have a point about us being autistic as fuck. And @autism420 is still Islamic IMO.

Thanks man. Should be no surprise to you that a fellow autist like me would show up here. Autists there hate me. But it was glad I learned that all spergs needed to believe the same things about autism OR ELSE.

[...]

NotCobalt: [in response to a user making a list of quotes from the topic] What list? The one of "people you want to have sex with" or the one "These exceptional individuals used to belong to an ancient forum with like perhaps 500 active members, so they probably know each other, and I wish I had been a part of that cool kids club back when, but instead I was too poor to afford internet, so I just cried all day instead"?

[...]

sikotik: The site started going down hill as early as 2008 when every other user became a tranny &/or easily triggered furry.

[...]

TimeToTurn: Never knew Marjan got banned, but I can assume he would with the new administration. Distind only banned spammers and shit. The new administration seems intent on making it a "safe space". Even though they always made fun of other websites like Free Republic and Rapture Ready for "suppressing free speech". I can't post shit messing with them (or I could, if I had a day to waste). So Marjan/caamib/whatever he calls himself can't do the same. I'd assume Marjan might be back at some point, but I don't really care to investigate. They really hate TOR, too, nowadays.

David J. Stewart I'm sure is as crazy as always, but him getting any crazier would take divine intervention and I'd just await either reports of his death (guy's a painkiller addict) or more dealings with the Guam government.

[...]

Dr W: The problem was that they didn't branch out into mocking SJWs. That's what kept Kiwi Farms rather politically inert. Instead, they allowed a core of crazy tranny furry dipshits to eject fecal matter everywhere.

Damn shame, I used to love that site.

[...]

rianzi: Shame how the site became infested by SJWS. It used to be a nice place where you could laugh at religious loons.

AE44 #conspiracy authenticenlightenment.com

Virginia Journalist False Flag Hoax Shooting Hits An All Time Low; SERIOUS FAKERY!!!

Whatever is on the controlled US state-run news, let it be known that the AmeriKan populous is purposely designed to be witness of the event.

Words can’t describe how bad of a hoax the Virginia Shooting was. A guy walks up within feet of the woman he supposedly kills and stands there for over 20 seconds pointing a pistol and a camera at her …and she doesn’t even notice him?


Not only does she not notice, but the woman being interviewed and the cameraman somehow fail to notice him too. This is also assuming there were no other crew there apart from these two employees.

The woman’s reaction to being shot is laughable at best (wake up sheeple). Your world is scripted.

By showing this LIVE people will assume it is real. But anyone with brain cells left can clearly see its all TOTAL BULLSHIT (no statistics available on the amount of the US population who’ve lost their brain cells via MSM propaganda, however, I’m certain the Tavistock Institution has that information).

Why doesn’t the gunman utter one word in the 45 seconds he is there?

Of course most people will feel sorry for our wonderful US state-run media, who would NEVER lie to us, when one of their own is murdered by these CRAZY GUNS and hence the need for gun control. (getting old)

This is another hoax for the ongoing attempt at a gun grab and also a diversion to the BS that’s going on in the world right now e.g Global Economic Crisis, the Ponzi scheme called Wall Street, Forced Vaccinations: SB277 PASSED and (ones on the way for adults, too), the War on Syria for another regime change, etc etc.

“In the cam video, it showed plainly that no bullet struck the female reporter. She did not react physically. She never winced, fell back, bent over or even grab at the wound to which everyone does. There was no blood, no rips, no hole or any sign that a bullet had hit her at all. Not only that, she remained upright, turned and ran away full speed with no sign of injury.” – PK

Per CNN, as usual, they use Zionist Wolf Blitzer as their pawn to exploit the lies; seriously, he’s not that bad of an actor. See here: http://money.cnn.com/2015/08/26/technology/facebook-twitter-virginia-shooter/index.html?sr=twmoney082615facebooktwittershooter1pstory

Then Hilary Clinton, as if right on cue, comes in calling for anti-gun legislation (the gun grab I posted about on August 21st regarding how the Hegelian Dialectic is utilized against a populous in preparation of the next false flag shooting). See Hilary’s performance here: http://www.redflagnews.com/headlines-2015/clinton-exploits-virginia-shooting-to-call-for-gun-legislation-video

Source: A Sheep No More

Now after reading the above, I’d like to add what actually threw up the red flag for me. Below are two photos, one is a still shot of the POV video supposedly filmed by the shooter and the other is the still shot that was supposedly taken from the news crew’s cameraman as he lay on the ground. Notice that in the POV photo, the shooter’s hand is white, and so is his arm. Does his arm start turning black after the sleeve starts? Highly unlikely. Also notice he’s wearing a blue plaid shirt. In the second photo from the camerman’s view, it shows a black man with all black clothing. Someone should explain that to us. A wardrobe change in the middle of this filming? Highly unlikely.

You decide.

BummerDrummer #racist #transphobia #homophobia incels.co

[JFL] Incels have a victim mentality

“Incels have a victim mentality, all they think about is how they have it hard and how society oppressed them, and that’s bad :soy: . Nothing is owed to incels :soy: :soy:“

meanwhile...

niggers screaming and rioting about how they dindu nuffin when a white police officer shoots one of them for being a fucking ape, or how they have it bad cuz muh white privilege and they expect government entitled slave reparations: “wow keep going black kings! Fight the oppressors! Black lives matter! Criminalize racism! Release the black men from jail!”


Meanwhile...
mentally ill trannies are cutting off their dicks for “gay rights” and homosexual men are raping children while talking about how LGBTQ people are discriminated against and how they are entitled to free hormones to turn them into some weird fucking freak show: “good job standing up for your sexual freedoms! gay pride! Every transsexual child deserves hormones!”

but no we are the victim mentalitied entitled people jfl

Chris Delamo #fundie redpillphilosophy.com

[From "The Case for Running Over Protesters Who Block Highways"]

Your morning commute is bad enough as it is: groggy-eyed, gridlock traffic, and a full day of work looming above you like your dickhead boss likes to do. But for some reason, today, the bumper-to-bumper pace of cars seems particularly…slow.

You crane your head out the window, strain your eyes into the horizon of automotive metal, and—WHAT THE FUCK!!? Just poking above the rows of cars, lined up side-by-side, are…people—standing—blocking traffic to a complete stand-still.

Morning Commuter, Meet #BlackLivesMatter:

Nothing epitomizes the irony of the modern American “activist/protester” like the juxtaposition between these privileged college kids “fighting for justice” and the hard-working adults busting their asses trying to get to work to feed their kids.

Years of being pampered and spoiled by their parents have taught these idealistic morons 2 things: 1) that they’re invincible, and 2) that the world revolves around them.

This level of self-centered narcissism masquerading as “altruistic” concern for #BlackLives or #MikeBrown or whatever dumb-fuckin-hashtag is created next to give these purposeless youths some kind of direction—these pitiful shitheads claim to be considerate of others while engaging in the most inconsiderate, obnoxious, fly-buzzing-in-your-ear-annoying behavior you could imagine.

[...]

It was another day of work for Tyree, a middle-aged black man from California who was driving to his job at Ross. But along the way, he found himself at a complete stand-still as a group of protesters lined up across the highway and blocked traffic.

They were with #BlackLivesMatter, a cult of black supremacists who pretend to be victims of some obscure, mostly non-existent thing they call “white supremacy” in order to covertly push their racist agenda. But Tyree Landrum wasn’t having it.

In a courageous act that likely got him labeled a “coon” or “Uncle Tom” by his more ignorant counterparts, Tyree stepped out of his car, rushed up to the protesters, and got all up in their faces.

[...]

Unsurprisingly, Tyree’s forceful pleas were met with pretty much nothing more than looks of bewilderment from the protesters who, in a semi-delusional haze, simply stared at him as if his words were valid, yet did not matter—the hallmark of privileged Millennial “activists” (“Sure, what you said is true, but what about my feelings?”)

#BlackLivesMatterButFactsDoNot

And so it is with great urgency that I coin a new term in this age of delusionally-dangerous liberal “activism”: “Highway-Terrorists.”

Highway-Terrorist:

/'hi?wa 'ter?r?st/

[noun]:

“a delusional individual who shuts down highways or other critical transportation infrastructure to promote a dubious and/or fallacious cause that results in the endangerment of innocent people.”

Now, upon first look, using the word “terrorist” to describe these naive college students/activists may seem extreme, but a closer examination reveals the inherent, widespread danger these highway protests pose to thousands—even tens of thousands—of innocent people.

The Dangers of Highway-Terrorism

1. Unemployment–>Poverty–>Starvation–>Death

We need only look at the aforementioned case of Tyree Landrum to realize the vast economic damage that highway-terrorists can inflict upon local communities.

[...]

2. Disrupting Paramedic/Firefighter Rescue Efforts

Highways are designed to ensure the flow of traffic at higher speeds than regular streets, which is one reason paramedics and firefighters will often utilize these routes when responding to emergencies.

However, when highway-terrorists block freeways, ambulances are faced with an unnecessary life or death delay. In the world of EMTs and rescue operations, every second counts.

[...]

3. Women Giving Birth

It is not uncommon for women to go through labor—or straight-up give birth—while in a car and being driven (or driving) to the hospital.

[...]

The Case For Running Over Highway-Terrorists

And so we come to it: the big question: are innocent motorists morally justified in running over highway-terrorists?

Fundamentally, the justification for such an act comes down to the simple principle of self-defense: when you are being aggressed against by violent, barbaric people who may very well take your life or that of another person, are you justified in fighting back?

Well, unless you like victim-blaming, the answer should be an obvious “yes”.

So, we’ve established that you have a right to defend yourself against aggressors, now the next question is: are highway-terrorists “aggressors”?

Well, the three aforementioned points describing how deliberately delaying traffic can lead to injuries/loss of life for countless innocent people should answer the question: OF COURSE highway-terrorists are aggressors: they are deliberately choosing to engage in behavior that can lead to innocent lives being lost or harmed. Do not let the big posters and synchronized chants for “justice” distract you from the vicious, underlying reality: these people are terrorists who orchestrate elaborate, coordinated, premeditated strikes that have quite a high chance of injuring or killing innocent people.

So let’s follow the logic: you have a right to defend yourself against aggressors. Highway-terrorists are aggressors. Thus, you have a right to defend yourself against highway-terrorists.

But now, what exactly constitutes “self-defense” in this case? The most obvious suggestion would be putting the pedal to the metal and plowing your 2-ton vehicle right into the dead center of those naive (yet dangerous) “activists”, shattering their idealistic (yet dangerous) fantasies in the span of a few tire revolutions.

Kind of like this:
[IMG]http://gifs.gifbin.com/022011/1298914487_car-plows-through-cyclists.gif[/IMG]

Now, this of course is a very EXTREME thing to do, something which would only be justified in the most EXTREME situations. You need to use discretion: the degree to which you exert self-defense should, to a degree, be proportional to the aggression inflicted upon you by a highway-terrorist. I don’t believe doing what you saw in the above GIF is pretty much ever justified, unless, for example, you’re a pregnant woman who gave birth in your car and your baby needs immediate medical attention in order to survive. Now, if you’re thinking, “but how is it justified to run over and potentially kill 5 highway-terrorists just to save 1 newborn life?” Well, this is what I call the “self-defense inflation tax.” It basically means that, when defending yourself, you are justified in inflicting approximately 3 times as much damage as the initial aggression inflicted upon you. These are just added costs for being the one who started it, and it’s completely sensible.

So yes, in the most extreme situations, like trying to get your newborn to the hospital, I believe plowing through highway-terrorists is completely justified.

[...]

Conclusion

In all, I conclude that, at the least, every single motorist is morally justified in slowly driving their cars forward—first as a warning to highway-terrorists, then gradually increasing the speed, gently nudging them out of the way.

If any of the more extremist ones choose to increase their aggression by hanging on to the car, punching your window, or kicking your door, you are thus now justified in increasing your self-defense, maybe with some more speed, or a sudden swerve to shake off the moron hanging on to your side-view mirror.

Ultimately, dealing with highway-terrorists is a very serious matter, one which requires your discretion based on your personal situation. There is no one-size-fits-all approach. Happy Travels!

The Last Trump #fundie disqus.com

Doesn't change a darn thing about Christianity being completely incompatible with homosexuality. And all of the Christians know it.
And it DRIVES you crazy! :)

Just once I wish you'd say something factual and not something that's your opinion that you WISH was factual. You're not driving me crazy - I'm driving YOU crazy, because your messages spiral further and further into demented raging every time you post. That's what happens when you're challenged to prove something that you are unable to prove. Seriously, man, your hee-hee-ometer is through the roof with self-righteous crowing over something you're clueless about.
There are gay Christians. So you lose THAT one, too.

My hee-hee-ometer! Ha! I like it!
And, no, there are not. Incompatible Muffin. I really am sorry.
You'll just have to find another religion that accepts perversion.
Maybe Islam? Good luck with that...

Don't be sorry, Last Trump. There are gay-welcoming churches in the city I live in, so you're demonstrably wrong. Something you apparently never tire of.

And if you are going to continue to call homosexuality perversion, then don't be surprised when people call you out for hate, because that is precisely what it is.

Apostate churches Muffin. Apostate. (Look it up)
The Bible warned us of their rise. And of their demise.
What a book! Check off yet ANOTHER accurately predicted prophecy.
Thanks be to God for authoring the Bible and repeatedly proving it with accurate and irrefutable fulfillments of His own predictions!
And YOU thought shepherds and goat herders wrote it!
Silly goose!

Apostate church = The One I Don't Go To. Classic No True Scotsman fallacy. You seriously can't do better?
Anything you don't like in this life is something you can conveniently claim was one of those things the Bible "warned" you about. Just like Matthew 5:11 gets pulled out any time someone points out to you how off the mark you are. Yeah, what a book. Written by goat herders, exactly.

Some incels #sexist reddit.com

Re: Cracked article of lies tells you how you 'get sucked into the 'incel' trap'

image

(hypothrowaway3)
JFL no article about “incels” will ever put anything less than a 9/10 Chad in the image

I’d sell my fucking soul to look like that dude

(JustAnotherGhosted)

around a dozen occasions where a woman flirted with me, but it didn't "count" because they weren't (to my eyes) solid in the looks department

Direct quote from the article. Not a truecel

(Thanks4HoleStranger)
LARPing woman. They always like to pretend men actually do this to excuse their own behavior. Even chads will hook up with a 4/10 if she asks unless he has something better to do, like a 7/10.

(Sewblon)
The problem with this way of thinking is that it is idealist. It says that the problem is "People are thinking the wrong things, and need to think the opposite things." The things that people think matter. But the things that people think are logically dependent on the physical environment they occupy. Not the other way around.

(HoboMaxxed)
Why is the Alek Minassian one still incel related? Wasn't that a troll post from a mock profile, plus he's an Armenian who killed people on the Armenian Day of Remembrance.

Instead we get this false incel narrative while the Armenian Genocide gets forgotten again.

(evilcel)
Because him being an incel helps normies push their narrative even though he was never confirmed to have been an incel at all.

Return of the Harem of Strawwomen!

DermoscopyStudier #sexist reddit.com

I agree with everything said here

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I posted this on incels a while back. Let me know if I missed anything, because after all, I wouldn't want to unfairly generalize women.

All women fall into one of the following categories:

Ditzy nursing student/nurse: She might not be a nursing student (though the odds are good that she is), but rest assured, she is at least reasonably hot, and she is dumb. She might also be a dental hygienist. She writes and types like a child, she can’t hold an even remotely intelligent conversation with a male, yet she succeeds in life because it is impossible for females to fail classes. The teachers will not allow it. And she will be affirmative actioned into a job after she graduates. Her boyfriend/husband is a 7+. Catch her in the supermarket wearing her work clothes. This is the future for a lot of “Staceys,” as you call them. Cheerleader-type.

Somewhat-attractive liberal artsy feminist: Has dyed hair but is fairly cute. She’s “polyamorous.” She’s just exploring her sexualityyyyy. What this means is that she collects Chad dicks like they’re going extinct. If she has a boyfriend, she’s openly cucking him…and he pretends to be fine with it because that’s the “enlightened” thing to do these days. Hello, it’s The Current Year, women LOVE SECKS as much as menz!!!111 The heterosexual ones are all subs in BDSM. Some of them are confused lesbians who claim to be bisexual and will peg their effeminate boyfriend. He’s gotta be pretty, though. This ain’t a prison. She will eventually realize she’s gay and thank her effeminate boyfriend for helping her figure this out.

Ugly dyed-hair feminist: Probably wears thick-framed glasses. A walking modern cliche…don’t really need to go into the description too much. Privilege, patriarchy, problematic, rape, rape culture, abortion (cough “women’s issuez”), mansplaining, etc. Into BDSM, but paradoxically, if she is heterosexual, this manhater is a sub. In the bedroom, she wants you to treat her like a slut and choke her. If she’s a lesbian calling herself “bisexual,” she enjoys pegging submissive men who are effeminate because she is really into women.

Lesbian: She has either lost interest in pretending to be bisexual for the “look at me” factor, or she’s the masculine type who was boyish from a young age.

Quiet artsy prude: This type of chick doesn’t want to have sex at all. She’s a hipster and so is her boyfriend, who is a pussy iphone-toting, Starbucks-drinking numale feminist who won’t pressure her to do much in the bedroom. When she does have sex, she lies there like a dead fish. She’s obsessed with pretty thingz (“art”) and loves her Pinterest account. This includes pretty, dainty little foods/recipes. The blueberry muffins sawed in half on a cutting board with shards of wheat in the ambiance are fine, but what she really wants is pictures of some kind of Asian cuisine. You know, shit that really shouldn’t be anything more than an appetizer. Remember, everything has to be pretty, little, dainty, light, chic, and hip. She thinks she’s quirky and creative, but it’s all a put-on. She cares about making the image in her mind real more than whether or not she actually enjoys it. And any male who enters her world will have to fit that mold…especially since sex hurts her narrow vagina.

Fat black woman: If you’ve met one, you’ve met them all. They’re loud, they’re obnoxious, they’re sassy. They drive like their attitude. If you’re at a 4-way stop sign and you get there first, they ain’t waitin’ for no other cars…get outta her way! She bitches constantly about how black men be datin’ them white women and they caynt handle a STRONG. BLACK. WOMAN. “Dat’s why dey be shirkin’ they responsibilities to they baby mommas and da 5 keee-yids dey had out of wedlock.” “Your honor, he ain’t payin’ his challlld suppote.” If your cock is below 7 inches, they think it’s TINY. They thought Chris Brown’s dick (of which pictures leaked), which is probably longer flaccid than mine is erect, was “tiny.” And they will fight yo ass. Black men generally aren’t white knights the way both the numales and the religious, southern, “you hit a woman you get a whoopin” white men are, so they will give these feral hyenas what they deserve if it comes to it. It only takes about 84 punches and slaps before a black man has finally had enough and drops her with one punch.

Non-fat black woman: See “Fat black woman,” but add an extra layer of pretentiousness. The race whining will make you want to strangle her.

Fat white woman (non-feminist): This is separate from the morbidly obese woman. If you think her being fat will make her standards lower, think again. She’s vicious and thinks men are beneath her. That Tedx talk Youtube video of the fat woman bitching about men who meet her standards not wanting to date her…that’s what they’re all like. Eventually, a Chad comes along and dates her…oftentimes a black Chad (a Tyrone?), since blacks love their big booties, even if it’s really a fatass with a fat ass. The guy had better work out, because he needs to be able to make her feel like a dainty woman in the bedroom, after all…and that’s quite difficult because she’s a “curvy” woman. You know, the curves extending outward from her stomach? Anyway, if you’re not Chad, you’re always at risk of being yelled at and belittled by this creature. If you are Chad, you’re at risk if you don’t want to date her, because that means you’re shallow and can’t handle a woman with a HEALTHY BODY TYPE. She’s opinionated, condescending, and thinks she’s smart, but she’s actually a complete idiot, and there’s nothing worse than opinionated idiots. Lately, there has been a trend for slender 7 males to date these fat white women, and you can bet these are abusive relationships, with her bossing him around and him taking it either because he is getting off on it because he has a fetish for being submissive to a fat white woman and kissing her feet, or just because he’s that desperate and has no self respect. Either way, she has absolutely no respect for him, and will dump him/cuck him at first opportunity.

Morbidly obese white woman: Usually some form of white trash. This is an incel’s “league,” I’m afraid. May be missing some teeth. Hygiene probably lacking. She’ll do it because to her, it’s just “fun.” She doesn’t give a fuck so she’s willing to give fucks. Aside from that, a headcase…but what did you expect? You don’t get to be like 300 pounds as a woman without being mentally fucked up. Incel competition is redneck white males.

Non-obese redneck/white trash white woman: It’ll be a cold day in hell before you can ever trust her to be faithful. Southern accent, lousy teeth, and cigarette smoking. Probably addicted to pills and/or booze. If not, she’s certainly close to people who are. At least her standards aren’t as high. She might even cheat on Wayne with a white incel. I guess incels just need to look for white trash females if they want to have any shot whatsoever.

Cute, nerdy little Asian girl: Awwwww. Girls are gamers too, dooooood. Don’t be fooled by her apparent disposition…she will friendzone the fuck out of you if you’re not Chad or at least an Asian Chad. Her Miss Innocent act doesn’t change the facts; you’re her beta orbiter “male friend” and she’s not interested.

Middle Eastern Muslim girl: Her parents will literally kill her for being with a man who is not Muslim. If you’re a terrorist, you’re not incel.

GymChad CC-rider: She can’t even settle down enough to let teachers and employers get her into nursing and hygienist professions. She probably works in real estate, or that will be the height of her career after she’s done as a receptionist. It doesn’t take long before she’s knocked up…and her kid becomes “her world.” Not to worry, Gainz Chad is to the rescue. Sure, she got fucked off Tinder and got some free meals from OKCupid, but in the long run, it’s getting married and divorced a few times to some Gainz Chads who cheat on her (“why are all guyz such jerx?! And my cheating doesn’t count!”) that is going to help her be a perpetual single mom.

Dumb Christian Girl Who Takes Religion Seriously: These are actually a catch, all things considered, but they’re only available for Cowboy Chads. She will invariably end up with this “southern gentleman,” and his hobbies include huntin’ and fishin’. What else to do when they’re not goin’ to church? The Lawd says thou shalt kill animals. He bought himself a truck. The most important men in her life, in order: Jesus, her sons, Cowboy Chad. She’s dumber than planting flowers near a mailbox, but she has no problem with “traditional gender roles.” She will cook for you. She will regurgitate Cowboy Chad’s conservative politics, etc. However, she expects a man to be a “man,” so incels are out, as are numale hipsters. She wants a man of the house. Take the good with the bad.

Psychopath: They really aren’t like other girls. If you don’t mind anything from regular criminal activity to being murdered, if you can find these rare exceptions, you might catch a break. She’s so crazy and delusional she might fuck an incel. Better be a light sleeper; you might want to wake up before she puts the knife to your penis or drowns the kids in the bathtub. Often overlaps with the white trash/rednecks.

CH #sexist heartiste.wordpress.com

Democrat Mayor of New Brighton, MN, the tubby post-menopausal schoolmarmish Val Johnson, is emblematic of the shitliberal establishment in predominantly White regions of the country. Here she is caught on video having an emotional breakdown ranting about the phantasm of “White privilege”

...

Female brain gone insane.

This is your political party on estrogen, hot flashes, and dying ovaries. The feminization of the Democreeps means more crazy cat ladies virtue signaling like lunatics about all the browns and blacks they “look after” while haranguing White men about their privilege and misogyny. The mass influx of bitter hags and wrecked sluts into politics has been a disaster for the West, no doubt about it.

What’s more pathetic than this cunt’s psychotic break in the video, if that’s possible, is the collective reaction of the four UGH WHITE MALES sitting there taking hot splooges of this broad’s insanity to their faces. Not one of these “””men””” had the balls to tell this shrike to shut the hell up? You know they were all thinking it. At least, you hope they were thinking it; maybe shitlib White men are so utterly emasculated that this feels like normal to them. They would feel adrift without some rancid cunt shrieking like a banshee about how evil and stupid and entitled they are.

Anti-White feminism is a civilization-wide shit test, and men are failing it, badly. What the country needs more than ever is one man with brass ones to jab a chadfinger in one of these cunt’s porky mugs and tell her off. “There’s no such thing as White privilege you stupid old shrew, and if you keep it up I’m gonna throw you out of a helicopter!”

The Emascunations of the West are feeding the delusions of our worst people, and so naturally we are getting more shitty people behaving even shittier than ever running things into the ground. When the eunuchs guard the cunts, civ death is close at hand. Alexis de Tocqueville warned that America would turn into a country of masculine women and weak men, and that’s exactly what happened. The crazy cat ladies, homos, and ball-less wonders are at the helm, steering the ship of state straight into the litter box.

Brian Niemeier #conspiracy #mammon brianniemeier.com

As the world braces for the looming coronavirus pandemic, scattered details are emerging of a deliberate and sinister motive behind the outbreak.

Kudos to internet sleuth Mister Anti-Bully and Metokur's Sweetie Squad for piecing this horrifying puzzle together. Jim's friend's Twitter feed has gained a well-deserved reputation for breaking news on the virus days before the mainstream media. Their theories and predictions have proven correct so often that I recommend the feed linked above as your go-to source for coronavirus info.

Their latest hypothesis, which looks to be bearing out, concerns the shadowy Shincheonji church of South Korea. The recent explosion of infections in that country has been traced to the church's location in Daegu.

It's worth noting that Christian leaders in South Korea consider Shincheonji a heretical pseudo-Christian cult. The cult's founder, self-described "messiah" Lee Man-hee, claims to be the second coming of Jesus and to have secret knowledge of how to interpret Scripture.

[...]

Whether deliberate or not, the Pop Cult and the original Death Cult are issuing calls for omnicidal solidarity with the Coof Cult.

If there's a silver lining to the coronavirus pandemic, it's that people are realizing our rulers' incompetence and yes, their nihilistic courting of death.

Civilization may survive Corona-chan, but the tottering edifice of globalism is unlikely to pull through.

For more gripping theological horror, buy my first captivating Soul Cycle book, now just 99 cents!

Britt Gillette #fundie end-times-bible-prophecy.com

Transhumanism In Bible Prophecy

Transhumanism and the great rebellion

Is transhumanism in bible prophecy?

That's a great question, because this generation is poised to witness the emergence of a radical new social movement known as transhumanism.

Expressing an unshakable faith in the continued and rapid advance of human technology, transhumanists look to the future with what can only be described as a religious fervor.

Many of this movement's adherents point to the singularity (an exponential increase in technological advancement so rapid the unaided human mind is unable to grasp its implications) as the climax of human civilization.

Believing this event will usher in a new era for the human race in which limited mortals transcend their biological bodies and set out to conquer the universe, transhumanist anticipation of the singularity is comparable to Christian anticipation of the second coming of Jesus Christ.

Ironically, the bible points out that in the time just prior to the second coming of Jesus Christ the world will be characterized by unparalleled human arrogance. Led by the Antichrist, the human race will not only launch a spiritual rebellion against God, but an actual physical confrontation between themselves and the King of kings, Jesus Christ.

The apostle Paul foresaw this conflict almost 2,000 years ago:

"For that day will not come until there is a great rebellion against God and the man of lawlessness is revealed - the one who brings destruction. He will exalt himself and defy every god there is and tear down every object of adoration and worship. He will position himself in the temple of God, claiming that he himself is God." 2 Thessalonians 2:3-4 (NLT)

The Tower of Babel

To properly understand the origins of this rebellion, we must first examine the development of human civilization in the aftermath of the flood. It is a time marked by another rebellion first chronicled in Genesis Chapter 11.

It's the story of the Tower of Babel:

"At one time the whole world spoke a single language and used the same words. As the people migrated eastward, they found a plain in the land of Babylonia and settled there. They began to talk about construction projects. 'Come,' they said, 'let's make great piles of burnt brick and collect natural asphalt to use as mortar. Let's build a great city with a tower that reaches to the skies - a monument to our greatness! This will bring us together and keep us from scattering all over the world.'

But the Lord came down to see the city and the tower the people were building. 'Look!' he said. 'If they can accomplish this when they have just begun to take advantage of their common language and political unity, just think of what they will do later. Nothing will be impossible for them! Come, let's go down and give them different languages. Then they won't be able to understand each other.'

In that way, the Lord scattered them all over the earth; and that ended the building of the city. That is why the city was called Babel, because it was there that the Lord confused the people by giving them many languages, thus scattering them across the earth." Genesis 11:1-9 (NLT)

In this story, God scatters the human race and confuses them with different languages. His reason for doing so is to avoid the inevitable disaster wrought by global government and a common language.

Why are these things a concern?

Are you confident you can weather the current economic storm? Learn how to build an online business that works.

Because if they continue unabated, in due time, "nothing will be impossible" for the human race. This is more than a flippant comment by God. It's a prophecy of things to come.

It's a prophecy of something so bad, God put a stop to it the moment He first saw it. God knew that, left to pursue its technological development, the human race would one day challenge Him. After all, what was the motive for building the Tower of Babel in the first place?

"Let's build a great city with a tower that reaches to the skies - a monument to our greatness!" Genesis 11:4 (NLT)

The human race set out to build a monument to its own greatness, exalting mankind above God and extending its tower far into heaven with the sole intent of usurping God's glory and authority. This innate human desire did not end with the Tower of Babel. It continues to this day, and soon it will result in one final attempt to usurp the authority of God.
The Great Lie

The motive for this great rebellion will be predicated on lies. The bible predicts that deception will be rampant in the end times.

And just as God hardened the heart of Pharaoh for putting faith in his own power, He will do the same to the inhabitants of the earth who will become drunk with their own power:

"So God will send great deception upon them, and they will believe all these lies." 2 Thessalonians 2:11 (NLT)

Paul makes it clear that these people will be deluded into believing "the lies."

But what exactly are the "lies" to which he refers?

A cursory examination of the first book of the Bible reveals a quote from the originator of lies. In fact, it's the very first lie referenced in the bible:

"'You won't die!' the serpent hissed. 'God knows that your eyes will be opened when you eat it. You will become just like God, knowing everything, both good and evil.'" Genesis 3:4-5 (NLT)

These lies from the Garden of Eden are the same lies to which Paul refers.

The same lies which brought sin into the world will be the same lies which spark the ultimate rebellion against God Almighty. Humanity will come full circle.

In the last days, the same construction projects envisioned by the Tower of Babel architects will result in mankind achieving a level of technological sophistication so advanced that "nothing will be impossible for them."

The human race will come to believe the great lies of the serpent.

In his arrogance, man will believe he is:

1) Immortal
2) All-Knowing

and

3) Just like God

Mankind will mimic the earth-shattering arrogance of Lucifer by freely joining in his rebellious attempt to usurp the throne of God. Because without Jesus Christ, fallen mankind's ambition is the same as Lucifer's.

Centuries ago, Isaiah described this fallen being and his sinister motives:

"How you are fallen from heaven, O shining star, son of the morning! You have been thrown down to the earth, you who destroyed the nations of the world. For you said to yourself, 'I will ascend to heaven and set my throne above God's stars. I will preside on the mountain of the gods far away in the north. I will climb to the highest heavens and be like the Most High.'" Isaiah 14:12-14 (NLT)

In the last days, this passage will not only be an accurate depiction of Satan, but of all mankind.
The Transhumanist Movement

The latest incarnation of man's rebellion against God is the transhumanist movement.

Many within the movement believe the singularity will lead to the emergence of "post-biological humans" who are able to shed their biological bodies and "upgrade their hardware." Others believe that by downloading themselves into a network, they will effectively become "immortal."

True believers have modified their diets, exercise routines, and entire lifestyle in an effort to increase the likelihood of living to witness human reversal of the aging process and eventual human "immortality."

Ray Kurzweil - inventor, author, and transhumanist - is considered one of the best in the world at accurately forecasting short-term and intermediate technological trends.

In Chapter 7 of his bestselling book "The Singularity is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology," he describes his view of the ultimate outcome of our technological advance:

"The matter and energy in our vicinity will become infused with the intelligence, knowledge, creativity, beauty, and emotional intelligence (the ability to love, for example) of our human-machine civilization. Our civilization will then expand outward, turning all the dumb matter and energy we encounter into sublimely intelligent - transcendent - matter and energy. So in a sense, we can say the Singularity will ultimately infuse the universe with spirit."

According to Kurzweil, the universe will be infused with "spirit" as a result of the natural advance of our human-machine civilization. This infers that the universe is not already infused with "spirit," and that if God exists, His designs are inferior to those that will be created by the predicted human-machine civilization.

In the next paragraph, he describes the advancement of the human-machine civilization as approaching the very conception of God. Ironically, he admits that the accelerating growth of evolution can never achieve the infinite character traits exclusive to God:

"Evolution moves toward greater complexity, greater elegance, greater knowledge, greater intelligence, greater beauty, greater creativity, and greater levels of subtle attributes such as love. In every monotheistic tradition God is likewise described as all of these qualities, only without any limitation: infinite knowledge, infinite intelligence, infinite beauty, infinite creativity, infinite love, and so on. Of course, even the accelerating growth of evolution never achieves an infinite level, but as it explodes exponentially it certainly moves rapidly in that direction. So evolution moves inexorably toward this conception of God, although never quite reaching this ideal. We can regard, therefore, the freeing of our thinking from the severe limitations of its biological form to be an essentially spiritual undertaking."

The concluding sentence of this paragraph should send up red flags for every student of bible prophecy. According to Kurzweil, as the human race moves forward, it will seek to free its thinking "from the severe limitations of its biological form."

The bible reveals that one day mankind will gather its armies in an attempt to "break the chains of God and set themselves free from His bondage." Psalm 2 describes this confrontation:

"Why do the nations rage? Why do the people waste their time with futile plans? The kings of the earth prepare for battle; the rulers plot together against the Lord and against His Anointed One. 'Let us break their chains,' they cry. 'And free ourselves from this slavery.' But the one who rules in heaven laughs. The Lord scoffs at them." Psalm 2:1-4 (NLT)

Could this passage describe an attempt by post-biological humans to overthrow the rule of God?

Could the chains which hold them in bondage be the "severe limitations of their biological form"?

Remember, when this event occurs, Satan and his fallen angels are also inhabitants of the earth:

"Rejoice, O heavens! And you who live in the heavens, rejoice! But terror will come on the earth and the sea. For the Devil has come down to you in great anger, and he knows that he has little time." Revelation 12:12 (NLT)

In his arrogance and desperation, Satan will advance the dark powers of the spiritual realm, aided by a fallen mankind with powers beyond our current limitations, in a last ditch effort to defeat God.

The technological advancements of the near future will provide mankind with unprecedented power, and the ambitious goals of the transhumanist movement are already in direct conflict with God Himself.

The following verse provides additional support for believing transhumanism will play a pivotal role in this final rebellion. In the New Testament, when Jesus describes the signs of His Coming to the disciples, He makes an interesting statement in light of our times:

"And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved: but for the elect's sake those days shall be shortened." Matthew 24:22 (KJV)

Throughout the centuries, this verse has been interpreted as meaning the Second Coming of Christ will arrive just in time to save the human race from itself, meaning human wars would threaten to cause the extinction of the human race.

However, it might mean that "no flesh will be saved" because a nakedly ambitious human race will transform itself into a race of "post-biological humans" intent on reshaping the universe according to an alternative agenda.

Given the history of human rebellion against God, it would be unwise to discount this possibility.

The Great Rebellion

Just as Paul prophesied, human ambition will ultimately lead to a great rebellion against God. This rebellion will reach its zenith at Armageddon, an actual geographical location in modern day Israel. The gathering of the world's armies at Armageddon will not be (as some believe) a war of humans versus humans, but rather a literal physical confrontation between rebellious mankind and the King of kings, Jesus Christ. In addition to Psalm 2, this battle is referenced multiple times in scripture, and it's clearly referenced twice in the Book of Revelation:

"These miracle-working demons caused all the rulers of the world to gather for battle against the Lord on that great judgment day of God Almighty." Revelation 16:14 (NLT)

"Then I saw the beast gathering the kings of the earth and their armies in order to fight against the one sitting on the horse and his army." Revelation 19:19 (NLT)

The "one sitting on the horse" is identified as Jesus Christ. Literally interpreted, both these passages state that the world will gather for battle against Jesus Christ. The bible is clear about this, yet for countless generations, these passages have been interpreted as a mere spiritual battle and not as a literal physical conflict. It's not difficult to image why. The idea of mankind physically engaging God in battle seems so preposterous that these passages have given way to numerous symbolic interpretations over the years. Yet scripture is clear. Remember what God Himself said about the human race that will ultimately fulfill His Tower of Babel prophecy - "nothing will be impossible for them!"

In fact, the Book of Daniel reveals that the Antichrist will manage to attack "the heavenly armies, throwing some of the heavenly beings and stars to the ground and trampling them":

"From one of the prominent horns came a small horn whose power grew very great. It extended toward the south and east and toward the glorious land of Israel. His power reached to the heavens where it attacked the heavenly armies, throwing some of the heavenly beings and stars to the ground and trampling them. He even challenged the Commander of heaven's armies by canceling the daily sacrifices offered to him and by destroying his Temple." Daniel 8:9-11 (NLT)

The power of the Antichrist and the human beings of his era will far exceed what our generation can currently imagine. As proof, Daniel describes a time when the Antichrist will engage Jesus Christ Himself in battle:

"He will even take on the Prince of princes in battle, but he will be broken, though not by human power." Daniel 8:25 (NLT)

The human race, led by the Antichrist, will take on the Lord Himself in battle. Like the Tower of Babel generation, the arrogance of this final generation will extend all the way into the heavens, where the human race will attempt to usurp the glory and authority of God Himself. But just like the Tower of Babel generation, their efforts will end in utter failure.
Conclusion

The transhumanist agenda serves as a reminder of what the human race is without the blood of Jesus Christ - an enemy of God. A movement which views its ultimate purpose as bringing enlightenment to the universe sets itself up in direct opposition to God's own purpose. This is the very definition of rebellion, and it's the inevitable result of fallen mankind's sinful nature.

Yet despite our sinful nature, God provided us with the free gift of salvation through His Son Jesus Christ. All we have to do is accept this gift. Those who accept it will experience peace and everlasting life, but those who reject it will become slaves to sin, and their ambition - like Satan's - will one day lead to an outright physical confrontation with God Himself. It's a battle that God will win.

Various incels #fundie reddit.com

(More from the incel doomsday cult!)

(BasedTruecel2)
Come on, North Korea. Fucking nuke us already.

Quit playing your games and just nuke us and destroy our power grid already. Then all stacies and normies around the country (and even the world eventually) will have a panic attack because they won't know what to do without their precious Facebook, twitter, instagram, and any other degenerate hypergamy promoting bullshit.

(BBCTheory)
Kim Jong Un is the North Korean definition of a low inhibition high status Chad, he doesn't even care about what Trump (another Chad) says, it would be an honor to live under Kim Jong Un's rule

I would love to see all those wannabe Chad cuck soldiers in the US Cuckarmy beg for mercy, it's not like the army isn't filled with cucks married to women who get pregnant with the nearest BBC as soon as their husbands deploy

(universallyabhorred)
Why is it taking so long, destroy this degenerate country already.

(StopCopingStartLDAR)
world war 3 really can't come soon enough. just nuke this fucking planet man. start over

(LynchingTriHards)
I really really really hope NK nukes multiple countries at once. Wipe out the dumb roasties and chads as they don't have a clue what to do during a nuclear attack.

(Cruelcel)
Lending my energy to you brother. I hope our hate thoughts can bring about the apocalypse soon. Once anarchy spreads and pesky laws abolished, let incels rise from the ashes and take the pussy that is our birthright.

(fagotonabike)
Amen

(ilieknothing)
St. Blackops2cel will be guiding Kim Jong Un's fingers as he types the codes because of our devotion to him

(lonelyreee)
Waiting and waiting and waiting...

(PulseCel)
Preach, picture the chaos. I would finally have a place in this world a solo freak lurker preying on families.

Various Incels #sexist incels.co

(Ropemaxx)

[Experiment] [Thought experiment] Imagine if a foid from inceltear woke up as an ugly/below average looking man

Just fucking imagine.
She would very quickly realize that her ”hateful attitude” wouldnt matter for shit.
hate women? Incel. Dont hate women? Still incel.

What these morons dont realize is that getting treated like shiit and having a 100% rejection rate made us hate foids, not the other way around.

This foid would literally in one night go from a tinder god to unable to land a single match from a non bot

Female privilege makes me so fucking furious you cant even imagine

She would be dead within a day.

That would be getting out lightly. They should live it for 25+ years. Fucking privileged cunts

she would rope in a hour

That pisses me off. They deserve more suffering, disgusting fucking hypocrites

(ThoughtfulCel)

That would be getting out lightly. They should live it for 25+ years. Fucking privileged cunts

Its like a person who was born into a rich family and talks shit about hard work. Just put your nose to the grindstone, save, and you can be rich like me despite my family being rich for generations and having a headstart.

Foids are so retarded that they believe it really is easy to be a guy.

All you have to do is shower, be polite, smile, get a haircut, and its that easy right?

Foids actually believe this. The idea that women have an easier time is insulting to them, because then it would shatter the reality that they are nothing but holes, and if they didn't have a hole they wouldn't be treated nicely.

(PPEcel)

You don't have to imagine, just look at FtM trannies, they're all either suicidal or want to transition back to females.

Exactly.

JFL, of course CuckTears had to whine about the trivial problems that femoids face in their life. One of them even said that it'd be fun to pee standing up.

https://www.reddit.com/r/IncelTear/comments/hwr31g/imagine_if_an_incel_woke_up_as_a_woman_all_their/

BasedTruecel2 #fundie reddit.com

They always laugh it off and pretend they don't care because it's just a bunch of loser virgins right? But then they go through all these great lengths to harass you. You can't participate anywhere without some triggered cuck bringing up your post history in an irrelevant thread, then everyone shits on you.

They send you pm's saying "le off urself u have a shit life XDXD". Mods on random subreddits will ban you merely for being an incel, and they'll even tell you that.

What is it about us that they find threatening? What is it about us that makes them so triggered? You'd think if they really did find us funny and pathetic, they'd really laugh it off and not go through great lengths to harass you, but they do.

Anytime someone says the sky is green, I say "haha, okay, whatever bud." And that's it. Anytime someone says Bush is a reptilian shapeshifter, again, I laugh because it's hilarious they think that, but that's it. I don't go harassing them, and go through great lengths to condemn them.

Meanwhile, an incel says it's all about looks and they have absolutely no way of changing it, normies REEEEEEE the fuck out, bring up your post history, harass you, etc. People don't act like that when they truly know deep down you're full of shit. Like I said, they laugh it off and say, "Yeah, okay bud, whatever," and that's it.

Jim #fundie blog.jim.com

The female equivalent of the male executive groping his secretary’s ass is the female executive shit testing the CEO. And observe. Female executives shit test their superiors all the time, paying very little attention to the menial drudgery of merely running the business. In this sense, women at work are seriously sex obsessed.

In this sense, it is sex all the time, work very little of the time. The company is boyfriend and family.

For girls, shit testing men is like men looking at girls boobs. Women want to go into engineering to shit test men. Men want to go into engineering because as little boys they loved toy trucks and video games. Girls go sex crazy at ten and stay sex crazy till menopause.

...

Feminism is driven by sex. They are always talking about rape and sexual harassment because they are always thinking about sex. They are not thinking about careers in engineering because they like the C language, but because the boys in engineering have a status hierarchy in which girls are at the bottom, so they want to shit test those boys by demanding equal, indeed superior, status.

bulldozer #fundie rr-bb.com

The Global Warming movement is a cult. It askews people's views, and creates a movement that includes New Agers and Environmentalist. Their view has nothing to do with Christian stewartship of the Earth and it's inhabitance it's based on the goddess concept and evidently our environment is affected by of all things, now hodl on to your hats folks, cause this one is going to blow you away. But aparently our enviroment is affected by...sin! Yes I know that it's hard to believe, but it has been proven that sin is the cause of Natural Disasters and yes, Global Warming! Shocking isn't it? Since the creation and fall of Adam and Eve, we have been progressing toward this end time scenerio...now, is the time that all good Christians to turn their hearts and mind back to the Creator....

[...]

SadnessMyMiddleName #sexist reddit.com

(Incel "satire")

Hi incels, female here...

I have been browsing incel subreddits for over two days now. I am a student of psychology and I want to write a thesis on inceldom and loneliness. I have seen all I wanted to see.

Since, I am a 22 year old female with almost a degree, I believe I can give you all advice on how you can improve your life tremendously. Ok, first thing to do is to stop browsing these forums, they will only make you sad. Instead read something better, like buzzfeed. Reading those blogs about research done on appearance is sad and fake. All those surverys and experiments done have no credibility.
The next thing to do will be to read and watch works of art by feminists. It will help you understand the world from the point of view females and how we have it harder than males.

Now, if you do those things, you can successfully ignore the blackpill and live your life in peace. If you are nice and lucky you will find a loving girlfriend who has truly discovered herself and is ready to settle down and be a good mom.

Oh, jeez. I am late for my date with chad. See y'all losers, oops, I meant guys later. Tee hee.

incel5cuck #fundie reddit.com

Why women control the SMV (Sexual Market Value) - A normie's perspective

First off, like the title says, I'm pretty much a normie and by some definitions a "chad." This is my take on the sexual market. The reason women control this sexual market is because men, even chads, have little to no standards AND many women could careless about sex and go on with their lives perfectly content without having it. My first point, men have no standards. Often times, I browse this subreddit or go on the incel discord and hear many incels say they have no standards and they would fuck anything. Many of these incels are just your average looking dude, nothing wrong with them. Then what happens is many incels begin to looksmax and they turn out to look something like a "chad" but at heart they're still incel. So they go for women who are below their looks and mess up the market. These so called chads who fuck girls below them in terms of looks are what causes the existence of incels. If better looking men focused on getting with women who are on par with them in looks, the worse looking men would have a shot with the worse looking women. At the moment, women who are "ugly" or "fat" can often get men who are pretty good looking and in shape simply due to the fact men are extremely thirsty. Women know they have this benefit and take full advantage of it. If we take away this power from them, then in theory, they will have to seek men who are on par with them in looks. The reason why I said this works in theory feeds into my second point. Women can be perfectly content with not having sex their entire lives. Many women have the mentality that they're hot shit due to the thirst of males. You'll see unattractive or fat girls get tons of matches on tinder or many likes on a Facebook profile picture. Society is constantly validating women, even the ugly fat ones, so they get a sense of "high standards" and will not settle for a man under a 7/10. This is why, even if we fix the problem of men being extremely thirsty, it's not guaranteed women will get with incels. Because they already have a sense of superiority and feel entitled to men who are above them in looks. I also don't believe women are as thirsty as men so if we fix the market place and only ugly men approached ugly women and no one else, women would just not have casual sex. Side note, most of this only applies to casual sex and casual dating, nothing serious or long-term. I know for serious and loving LTR's, love works in mysterious ways and often times looks aren't a factor. But you can't deny in a casual hook up encounter, looks are almost everything. Anyways, I know a lot of normies might get triggered by this post and think everything about the sexual market place is a lie and shit, but no, it's not and it exists. I used to be an incel and climbed my way out and I believe it's possible to change but I've learned the realities of sex and dating and know that many normie's are in denial of the problem that is incels. It's a real problem and fixing the SMV of incels is a major step for a more equal hook-up culture.

ChinaCurry #sexist #racist incels.co

[JFL] Observations from California (a twisted world?)- part 1

So I was a guest at a very, very large technology firm today and made some observations on blackpill during my time there:

1) the workers there are pretty cashed up regardless of what they do. They use this wealth to cope with stupid shit like drones, TVs, tech etc, rather than life enriching stuff.

2) the actual workers there were 80% male, and majority were curries or rices, and pretty subhuman. Would definitely say below average when you compare to my previous spells in California.

3) there were a lot of Stacies, but they were doing pointless stupid roles, not anything related to actual shareholder return, and seemed to dominate the curry, rice, and white workers

4) the white workers almost exclusively from what I saw were dating noodles, and in most cases these noodles were above them, average mayocel was 3/10 his average noodle was 5.

5) despite how much money the firm makes it was very liberal and laid back, very different to the banking culture I am used to, and people were spending a lot of time doing fun shit, and actually a lot of time just eating (maybe because USA?)

6) the rice workers, from what I could see, were pretty much all incel, and the curry workers with no exceptions had arranged marriages, many with hot currywhores, I guess cos they got $$

7) there were also a few chad STEM bros there, and they were pretty jacked but were also liberal af. I am trying to do something in business terms so did not drop any blackpills but was able to talk in a way as to learn people's views.

8) no one there seemed to be interesting in trying to nail any of the Stacies doing pointless shit, not did they seem interested in their position as incels/ cucks. My guess from this was that they are bluepilled af and just happy because their techbux and techstatus has got then SOMETHING, even though they are not hot gfs and they are only cucking them anyway

9) there were some rices and curries who were super try hard. I have seen this a lot with rices in Asia, but this was my first time seeing it on curries. It was quite laughable to look at, especially given I was super casual and unshaved.

10) the bosses were 90% curry and 10% white, these guys were also quite smart which surprised me, and I got the IMPRESSION they night be more responsive to the blackpil, as they have probably got more diverse experiences.

shii410 #sexist incels.co

RE: [Blackpill] SexStarvationPill: Dutch Government recognises importance of sex...

Dutch official advice to single people: find a sex buddy for lockdown

Those without a sexual partner asked to come to mutually satisfactory agreements

Who knew right. I take it that proclamation includes the once former Feminists who said "nobody is entitled to sex"...

Oh my. The 20s are shaping up to be very interesting to say the least.

“Proximity and physical contact are not a luxury, they are basic needs,” Duits wrote. “If we have learned anything from the Aids epidemic, it is that not having sex is not an option.”

Holy fucking Pickle Rick on a stick Batman! That's a yikes from me! Let's unpack this.:soy: Sex isn't a need you dirty incel! What, do you think you'll die from a lack of sex? You can have a perfectly normal life without sex. Stop being so entitled!:soy::soy:

She's a Foid. That what makes the Irony oh so delectable.

yep the fact that a feminist foid said that really sells it. I wonder how she would respond if you asked her to apply her same logic to incels.

JFL. she's the type of person to say that incels aren't entitled to anything and tell us to just live our entire lives without sex and never complain. but when she has to go a few weeks without sex because of quarantine, she instantly changes her tone and says that its a "human right" and "basic need". what a stupid fucking cunt

Unknown author #conspiracy washingtonsblog.com

Below, we’ll show that 9/11 could NOT have been an inside job …

...

IV. No One Could Keep Such a Big Conspiracy Secret … Someone Would Have Spilled the Beans

If Americans were somehow involved in letting 9/11 occur, someone would have talked.

Some jerk would have had too much to drink, and bragged about his dastardly deed at a bar.

True, military analyst and Pentagon Papers whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg said: “Secrets … can be kept reliably … for decades … even though they are known to THOUSANDS of insiders.”

And many other huge projects involving many thousands of people were kept secret for many years.

But that can’t be true for 9/11 (even though government officials say that 9/11 was state -sponsored terrorism).

V. Our Government Wouldn’t DO Something Like That

Third, there’s no way government officials, military or intelligence personnel – who are sworn to protect and defend America – would do something like that!

True, the U.S. government officials have admitted that they’ve repeatedly carried out false flag attacks.

But 9/11 was obviously different.

VI. But the Whole Controlled Demolition Thing Is Bullshit

Whatever you else you may think, the whole “bombs took down the Twin Towers” thing is bullshit.

True, the collapse of the third World Trade Center skyscraper on 9/11 – one that was never hit with a plane – makes no sense. But that building, World Trade Center 7, is not one of the Twin Towers.

And admittedly, thousands of engineers and architects and scientists (and see this) think that the Twin Towers themselves may well have been brought down with high-tech explosives.

But they’re obviously all high on drugs.

VII You Don’t Want to Be Labeled As Crazy (Or Worse) … Do You?

If – after reading the 7 facts above – you still question 9/11, then you might need a friendly warning …

If you don’t knock it off, you might be labeled crazy … or a terrorist.

VIII We Have to Censor the Conspiracy Theorists

After all, we’ve got to censor those darn conspiracy theories.

We hope that the above-described essay disproves – once and for all – all of the crazy theories going around the Intertubes, and that everyone will shut up once and for all about 9/11.

ToxicPersonality #dunning-kruger #elitist incels.co

RE: [Blackpill] Avoidant personality disorder is not a disorder, it's a response to a hostile misandric society.

Many of us have at one point been fine socializing with people, especially before puberty, it's only after we got bullied and shit on for being incels that we avoid people. Calling it avoidant personality "disorder" is a psy op to trick incels into going out in public so they can get shit on by normies.

Idk. Alot of us just have minds that are beyond the scope of norman society. I regularly see people that i would classify as objectively uglier than me but that are integrated into soyciety (although in a sexless fashion). Theres more to it than a pure looks scale when it comes to being in or out in this twisted game. You need to lack an awareness of trends and underlying currents that opporate within everyones minds, things that as blackpilled incels we naturally percieve. Being able to say and do the right things at key times does not magically come from having sex. It comes from having a low level form of conciousness where the person operates at a mere animalistic level and does not possess the capability to think beyond fitting in and feeling right.

WAH_FML and NewView_ #sexist reddit.com

(on /r/incels going private)

(whereismytomorrow)
it better be. if there's any good in the world, that entire sub should be shut down. it's vile.

(WAH_FML)
It's not. You are vile. For picking on incels for your own amusement.

(whereismytomorrow)
it's honestly insane how deluded you guys are. absolutely no self-awareness whatsoever, yet you still try to pin the blame on everyone else.

(WAH_FML)
im not an incel at all. I think they have a safe space and you are invading it because you are a beta cuck who feels better making fun of the defenseless.

Check yourself

(whereismytomorrow)
making fun of the defenseless? have you seen what these guys advocate? not only are they extremely misogynistic and often racist, they absolutely refuse to do anything about it. they just get off on trying to make everyone else miserable because they're too lazy and bitter to do anything else with their lives.

(NewView_)
What's wrong with being misogynistic? Every normie acts like it's a liability. Women hate us so we hate them too but apparently we aren't allowed to hate them? How cucked can you guys be?

(whereismytomorrow)

What's wrong with being misogynistic?

what in the hell? i can wholeheartedly guarantee you very few people in this world hate someone simply because of their physical appearance. that type of behavior is incredibly shitty, and acknowledging that is literally just common sense. here's the thing, though:

if that same person is a misogynistic douchebag who admittedly hates women, then yes, we have a perfectly good reason to hate them. people don't tolerate that shit, dude, and you can't blame anyone for that but yourself. that's also common sense.

(NewView_ )
Nobody irl knows I'm a misogynist. They still treat me bad. What's your point really?

(MakaveliRise)
Probably because they can tell you're some loser?

(NewView_ )
How do one can tell this? Explain

Edit: He doesn't answer. It's because one is ugly but he doesn't want to say it.

(Tiefseemonstrum; known here as Pharaoh Bastethotep)
Just because you don't explicitly express your contempt does not mean that it does not become obvious in less subtle ways, such as facial expression and body language.

Which is the real difference between you incels and the abusive arseholes you idolise: They have the manipulative skills to conceal their true nature, at least to their target, for a time - and by the time she finally realises that, she may find herself trapped in a situation she cannot escape on her own... or not, and she dumps him. Seriously, you grossly overestimate the success rates of "Bad Boys".

(NewView_)

Just because you don't explicitly express your contempt does not mean that it does not become obvious in less subtle ways, such as facial expression and body language

PuAs teach this shit for ages. All Incels were redpillers before they took the blackpill and still it didn't change shit for us.
Which is the real difference between you incels and the abusive arseholes you idolise

Are you delusional or something? You really said that this is the real difference between this guy and this sad being
and by the time she finally realises that, she may find herself trapped in a situation she cannot escape on her own... or not, and she dumps him. Seriously, you grossly overestimate the success rates of "Bad Boys".

You mean after they've fucked countless times they split up cause their personalities might not match that much but only took them 100+ nights to realize. Not like they just don't give a fuck about all that and just fuck everyone who is attractive.

Gregory Hood #racist amren.com

Kashmir: Suddenly the Left Understands ‘The Great Replacement’

Good news! It’s not a “conspiracy theory” anymore. The media finally understand that government policies affect demographics and that demography matters.

The Indian-controlled portion of Kashmir, known as Jammu and Kashmir (J&K), is the only majority-Muslim state in Hindu India. When India became independent in 1947, Article 370 of its constitution granted special rights to J&K so that it could maintain a Muslim majority.

On August 5, India revoked Article 370, to the dismay of most American media. Hindus, they warned, might take over!

Vox’s Alex Ward, for example, noted that Article 375 barred people outside the state from buying property, and was written to “prevent India’s majority-Hindu population from moving into Jammu and Kashmir and displacing the Muslims who live there.” Mr. Ward warned there could be “ethnic cleansing.” In another piece, Mr. Ward wrote that some believe “Hindus will flock to the region to push out the Muslims once and for all.”

Suggesting that loss of local population control could lead to “ethnic cleansing” sounds like an unhinged conspiracy theory. Mr. Ward himself, in a piece praising Pete Buttigieg’s plan to combat “white extremism,” said the idea “that white people are being replaced” is a “white nationalist” idea promoted by murderers such as the Christchurch shooter.

What’s wrong with revoking Article 370? Shouldn’t all Indians be able to buy property in their own country? Preventing “outsiders” from buying property sounds like restrictive covenants to me.

Mr. Ward or some “extremism expert” should tell the Muslim Kashmiris that there is no “us” or “them,” and that diversity will soon be their greatest strength.

Mr. Ward warns that Pakistan might intervene to maintain the status quo. Is he implying Muslims in Indian Kashmir might have dual loyalties and want the protection of a foreign country?

Even the New York Times now understands the great replacement:

Human rights activists said that the moves to change Kashmir’s status were only the first steps in a broader plan to erode Kashmir’s core rights and seed the area with non-Kashmiris, altering the demographics and eventually destroying its character.

The human rights group American Renaissance has made the same argument about the United States for decades.

The Washington Post also gets it: “Critics” reportedly say the Indian government’s ruling Bharatiya Janata Party wants to “dilute the concentration of Muslims there and further its project to enshrine the Hindu identity of the nation.” The author also compared the “ethnic and religious undertones” to those in the West Bank, another area where media outlets mysteriously understand the importance of demographics.

The Atlantic worried that without the rule “dating back to colonial times” barring non-Kashmiris from settling, “the demographic balance of the state could shift—and with it, the idea that a vibrant democracy must take special efforts to protect the status of minority communities.”

Should the “status” of the white minority in South Africa be protected? No, said an Atlantic article in 2018. Worrying about the survival of white farmers is a “thinly veiled white supremacist cause.”

Bloomberg’s editorial board said India had made a “mistake.” It wasn’t making Kashmiris “feel like full citizens, in control of their lives and their destinies.” “Democracies as large and heterogeneous as India cannot escape internal tensions,” it said, “but the way to relieve such pressure is to decentralize power and give citizens a greater stake in their governance, as well as more control over local resources.”

That same day, Bloomberg argued for increased federal power in America. “The U.S. needs better intelligence-gathering and more effective preemptive action against domestic terrorists,” it said. Bloomberg also called for more gun control and an intensified fight against “white supremacy.”

When Kashmiris demonstrated against revocation of Article 370, India sent in troops and declared a curfew. Now the BBC even appears to be sympathetic to terrorism in the name of ethnic identity. In an article called “Inside Kashmir’s lockdown: ‘Even I will pick up a gun.’” it quotes without editorializing an angry young man who says of his toddler, “He’s too small now, but I will prepare him to pick up a gun too,” in order to fight what Kashmiris call “dictatorial power.” The article did not call for “gun control” or “tolerance.”

The Associated Press warned that “for many, India’s decision is a breach of trust and an attack on Kashmir’s identity.” Another AP story quoted a local man: “Maybe slowly our identity will disappear.” The AP did not call him “racist,” “far-right,” or “nativist.”

Two weeks ago, Farooq Abdullah, a member of the Indian parliament who represents Jammu and Kashmir, said he would “not allow any changes in the demography of the state.” He swore to resist “any attempt to dilute Jammu and Kashmir’s unique identity.” Imagine an American politician saying such a thing about the United States.

For white people, progressives repeat condescending slogans about the inevitability of population change.

“Migration is inevitable.”

“Borders are just arbitrary.”

“There’s no way but violence and oppression to stop the mixing of different people.”

Yet now we hear warnings about a government trying to “dilute” a native population. Amazing.

Kashmiris are bitter because they thought the Indian constitution guaranteed autonomy. White South Africans thought their land was safe because the constitution said it was. White Americans foolishly think the Constitution will protect their rights. History follows blood, not ink.

Kashmir just got its equivalent of the Hart-Celler Immigration Act of 1965. Unless it’s reversed, Kashmir will lose its identity. Still, at least reporters and human rights groups won’t call Kashmir “racist” for resisting.

soblessed53 #fundie christianforums.com

What really gets my goat, is that America EVER let this become an issue. The first time a homosexual tried to claim this perversion is "normal" they should have been laughed out of town!

They want to be able to marry now,so they can play house and pretend that something so "abnormal" is actually normal, how crazy is that? ROTFL!

Scripture describes it perfectly,besides being described as an abomination,and vile.

various incels #sexist reddit.com

Re: Femcels don't want cha...

image

(throwawayirl3)
Best believe she gets plenty of free opportunities, just not from Chad

(whatdoinamethiscrap)
She can get all the things she described from lots of men that looksmatch her. But she needs Chad so much she'll pay for him.

(ThotSlayer44)
This. Chad will pump and dump her but not treat her like a princess. If she wanted this pampering treatment she'd need to date an average looking guy but most women would rather die than date their looksmatch.

(ascend2pajeet)
They literally had a thread 2 days ago that said incels are bad people because they're ugly and Chads are good people because they are hot and they were serious. JFL "LOOKISM ISN'T REAL BRO"

(AnyReference)
JFL a lot of incels go for femcels who later reject them and yet they say that incels only want stacy...

(WahmenMustDIe)
And yet again these so called Femcels proved that they are nothing more than Chad chasing whores.

(kin_o)
"female incels" would rather buy Chad's time for a nice fucking, than to even be associated with you and your "baggage"

It's over.

(ThotSlayer44)
I just got banned from r/trufemcels for telling the girl who made that thread to make a Tinder account instead of paying for escorts.

Lmao women are the meme gender.

Shawntheimmortal942 #wingnut #racist #conspiracy deviantart.com

So you can riot all you want and Chicago is really prepared for all these rioters despite you defunding them and you’re “for the cause“...but you don’t want these “protesters” at your front door? Lori Lightfoot is at least being honest for how much of a piece of shit she is and it’s so funny how democrats want to support rioters and shit all over the police but they don’t want these “protesters“ anywhere near their homes? Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

I think Razorfists right when he said there’s a civil war in the left, you have the moderates vs the crazies or the crazies vs the crazies because when they’re not bullshit shitting about Trump they’re kicking their own asses! How is that the left has turned into such a fucking circus?

Some incels #sexist reddit.com

This is what's waiting for you when you 'leave inceldom' JFL

image

(Binarycode1995)
You're not entitled to have sex with your wife. You should behave and pay all the bills while she enjoys her time with Jamal and tyrone.

(FeministAsFvck)
More than anything in this universe, women hate the fact that ugly men are sexual beings

(COPE_OR_ROPE)
Truth, any man who's had a female "friend" can relate. They see you as a castrated asexual being that had no penis, and if you ever try to escape the friendzone you are then declared a creep who only cared about sex and didn't really want to be her friend.

(justforlulzandkeks)

if you want to have sex with your wife you're abusive and ent1tled

What did the mentally ill whores mean by this?

What sub is this from, OP?

Gendercritical

That's what I was expecting

Those whores are completely insane, but nobody gives a shit about them. Only when they talk shit about trannies do ledditors get butthurt, but hating men is okay, jfl

([deleted])
They're literally female incels, but get away with it. It's probably because women have no real power lol. They ain't shit and can't do shit. Let them whine in the arms of their bulldyke sisters.

(fuckredditxxx)
In first world countries they most certainly do. Reveal yourself you cucked coward.

(WaitingOutABan)
The only thing I'll ever concede to the feminists is that their Gender Critical/radfem wing is fucking hilarious. If a serious radfem were to pretend to be satirical, she would win a Grammy for Best Comedy Album

(bangalorean-dude)
Yeah, I knew it. GC isn't known for logic or rationality.

(bigantennaemay1)
Estrogen isn't conducive to logic or reason.

(Zippo-Cat)
When your wife doesn't want to fuck you, you're sexually abusing her

unreal

(quercusp)
What is presented here is pure sexism:

„whiny entitled martyr me“, „sexually abusive husband“

Men‘s needs for tenderness and intimacy are ridiculed. Imagine the „war of the worlds“ provoked if women‘s sexuality would be dragged into the dirt in such a way and this in a female dominated sub!

(whatdoinamethiscrap)
Jesus fucking Christ. This is unreal.

Yes, they’re right that that sun is basically incels who manage to ascend though.

Porn sick depravity? Martyrs? Sexually abusive?! They’re married. Marriage is supposed to be a union of love, and love of course include both parties having enthusiastic sex with each other. That’s what it’s supposed to be, but I’m not naive enough now to think that that’s what it is today.

Akhnai #sexist incels.co

[JFL] "Incels should not breed for the good of society"

"Incels should be glad that they are not getting sex! Now their inferior genes wont pass on to the next generation and our society will improve!"
-t .normie

"Normies should be glad when their wives cuck them for a chad.Now they can raise chad's offspring as their own and mold them into superior men that improve society"
-t incel


All these normies forcing eugenics on us are retards thinking that they have high value genes

SaintElliot #sexist reddit.com

[OP of "You all are proof of evil female nature and all of you deserve to get raped by me"]

Your efforts to belittle our suffering and mocking us will not go unpunished. Females being alone and not being able to get chad is not comparable to real inceldom. Making fun of our ideology/philosophy and comparing your chad craving to our incel suffering in an effort to belittle inceldom is truly evil. It is a crime that can not be forgiven. All of you evil whores deserve to get raped and destroyed by me. Inceldom is a serious condition exclusive to men that needs to be resolved as soon as possible. It needs to be taken seriously and not get mocked or belittled. Even the claim that females can be incel belittles inceldom. Females claiming to be incel is an insult to real incels and the suffering they have to endure. Inceldom is serious. It is not a laughing matter. Inceldom kills, killed and will kill again. You, whores, are truly evil and disgusting. If you really claim to be incel then there would be no problem if I raped all of you fatass whores. That is what you disgusting slobs deserve. All of you are evil. Evil needs to be hated and destroyed. All of you deserve getting raped then shot by me. What you people do right now is a crime against inceldom and incels. This subreddit is a travesty and an abomination. I hate each and every single one of you with the very core of my being.

chudur-budur #sexist incels.co

[It's Over] Incel Trait: too depressed to wipe his ass after taking a shit (and reading these articles)

Is ass-wiping a major cope?
Yes Votes: 37 35.6%
No Votes: 67 64.4%

Just look at these articles:
1. “How do I tell my boyfriend he needs to wipe more?”
2. Real chads don't wipe their butt-holes.
3. It's so common that now feminists are labelling it as "septic masculinity"
4. They want us to make our butt-holes wiped.

Remember, the comments are from women complaining about their bfs/husbands.

After reading those articles, I am feeling very depressed.

I came to the realization that "ass wiping is a major cope".

A 9/10 blonde chad who never wipes his ass after taking shit with a turd riddled butt-hole surrounded by buzzing flies won't have any problem getting laid. Where a 5'2" 2/10 butt-ugly curry who thoroughly washes his butt-hole on the squirting hot-spring of the old faithful geyser at Yellowstone national park 10 times a day will never be able to get any shit.

JFL @ ass-wipercels.

Never began.

Some TERFs #transphobia reddit.com

Re: Fell into this sub and thought that this was some cherry picking of isolated events....open r/mtf and this is right on the front agh

image

Transcript

I had a date with a guy yesterday night and my big boobs made him blush hardcore. Gotta love these little achievements were guys look more at your chest than at your face

best purchase I ever made were breast implants :-p Only a bit more than a week post-op and I'm already so so so eager to show them off. Boobs are such a beautiful gift

(wavesareblue)

If it helps you out, I'm just a mostly regular dude and I didn't end up in these spaces because I was a radfem looking for company: I started out noticing that something was definitely wrong with the trans discourse I saw online and increasingly IRL as well and that's how I found GenderCritical and its sister subs.

(Radfemmer)

That's great. I always say this, everyone can see that this is wrong, you don't have to be a radfem to realise that this is just unbelievably fucked up in so many ways. We might disagree on a lot of things and maybe if we manage to quell this insanity we can all go back to arguing again. But right now, this trans stuff is harmful and dangerous to all of us, especially young girls and women, so everyone gotta come together and try and stop it, no matter where we stand on other things.

(Concernedmuch)

As others say, pointing to delusions and madness or the truth has nothing to do with radical feminism or any other label.

To lift the curtain, one must exist the cult to get s better view of the cult. This is that better view. You get to see them for what they really are.

Of course not all of them are like this. Some trans peeps are against this BS but then they’re silenced or are afraid to speak up.

(hollyboombah)

I'm usually super left wing and came to GC (which is how I found this sub) expecting them to all be crazy and to have a laugh. Instead I found myself agreeing and questioning why, as a feminist, I'm allowing men to dictate what women are just because they say they are women. I've also reached out to a few trans people trying to get a different perspective but as of yet I haven't been swayed from the idea that most trans people are mentally ill and need therapy and support, not transitioning. Though I do think there are some people who do experience dysphoria due to a brain abnormality, I also feel the majority fetishise womanhood and are highly misogynistic thinking that we are just fuck holes with portable boobs.

Administrative_Worth & jeremyjimmy #sexist reddit.com

Re: Manlet ingested soy and took blue pill advice and went clubbing. You flew too close to the sun, brocel. (JFL They call him a creep for even existing in their vicinity)

image

(Administrative_Worth)

fashionmaxxed

hairmaxxed

groomaxxed

chad face

all rendered useless by his manletism

height > everything

I wouldn't say height over everything, but there's a minimum height requirement to even be in the game. It's a looks multiplier, everything under 5'10 gets a multiplier less than 1, eg 0.9 for 5'9.5 and gets a number higher than 1 multiplier when over 5'10, eg 5'11 =1.2x 6'2 = 1.5 6"4= 1.8x If you're below 5'5, you're multiplier score is 0, which means for all your looks, anything times 0 is zero. You're a non entity in the sexual world. It's brutal but true. You might be able to beta buxx with a very short woman

Yeah. If anything height is inverse for women. All the tall foids are always whining about being overlooked for short girls. Theyre basically tallcels

Tall foids just refuse to date short men. They're like the white women who complain about noodlewhores taking all the white men, not once considering to date a ricecel.

It's because their dating pool is guys of the same height, maybe a tiny bit shorter, and prefer taller guys. Their pool is already diminished and heavily competed over. I've dated a really short girl. years ago before I became a dsiabledcel. You could just pick her up at will, it's alot harder to do that with a tall girl.

tall girls aren't out of the market. They're just competing fo an already diminished group of society that is highy sought after. a 6'0 foid doesn't usually want a 5'11 or 5'10 guy, she usually wants 6'0 + in a much stronger way than normal foids want 6'0+. Her heightmatch is her settle. SO she has 10% of the populaton which are even acceptable beta buxxers.

Unironically this might be why. I have a very shitty frame and even I have won every fight I had with foids. They just can't throw a punch, all they do is push and kick and scream it's actually hilarious.

How many foids are you fighting man?

(jeremyjimmy)
I'll get shit for this but I'm not an incel, I'm just suffering from being majorly blackpilled. I've been talking to girls in private about the blackpill. They confirm IT ALL. They say shit like "yeah, height is the number one thing. I want a guy to be big." A girl I know who is 4ft 11 said that. She dated a 6ft 1 guy.

Literally every single girl I've brought this up with has confirmed the height thing, that it's super important. I'll admit, this shit is important to me too, I love short girls. If they're too tall I find them less attractive. This is where society has royally fucked up, they tell the truth about male sexuality and lie, for dumb, instinctual, animal like reasons, about female sexuality and preferences. So it's resulted in all this shitty behavior from women where they talk one way and act the EXACT opposite and then punish you or try to for noticing.

That's resulted in all these movements online, the blackpill, MGTOW, redpill. Then they start screeching about those, calling them misogyny. If it's misogyny then why does every girl I've met repeat all this stuff when they're alone? They all love black/redpill videos on Youtube because girls all hate each other. I don't even dislike women, I hate the people who lie to men about this stuff. More women do need to be honest about this stuff in public though.

nubugman #conspiracy reddit.com

Re: State run media in my country "spent months infiltrating incel forums" and now claims we are a "greater threat" than Islamist extremism. JFL.

Very few of you know how deep this goes. I'll give a short summary for those who are confused as to why this is happening.
This is top down social engineering for advancing their agenda of destroying the common man and the formation of families. The majority of large scale destructive social movements are not organic and can easily be traced at their origins to influential moneyed elite.

Rockefeller/Carnegie/Ford/Mellon Foundations are publicly acknowledged for creating/funding the modern women's studies feminist by giving them millions of dollars of grants in the 1970's. They did not give this money without foreknowledge of what societal conditions this would create and how they would move further towards their own goals/profitability, that money was an investment. These mainstream movements that claim to be grassroot revolutions in origin always somehow end up creating conditions advantaging capital against labor.

Here's where the 'incels are terrorists' narrative must come in; the vast majority of you have been economically/sexually displaced as a result of this social engineering. Western society has experienced a massive wealth transfer from wages stagnating against inflation. Instead of the causes being critically examined, threatening their profits, you are branded a terrorist and male displacement will never be seriously addressed. You are the enemy for existing and you are a threat to all women.
They will do anything to protect/further this current economic climate. They are deeply integrated with the intelligence agencies and the media which serve them. Some of the attacks listed did not happen in the way they have been presented. I'll leave it there.

Luke Stranahan #fundie returnofkings.com

image

The American Presidential election looms ever closer, with the liberal candidate Hillary Clinton seeming to still win the (rigged?) polls despite ever increasing scandals. I want to use today’s space to examine some of the apparent inconsistencies of the left, the underlying motivations of their views, and how those views are fundamentally incompatible with the ideas of us here at Return Of Kings.

Modern liberalism, or leftism if you prefer, possesses several contradictions that make it seem logically impossible to hold all their ideas at one time in your head without suffering from an extreme case of cognitive dissonance. Whether it be simultaneously embracing the gay rights movement and feminism while having sympathy for fundamentalist Muslims, or how you can be for gun control to save all the toddlers who were lucky enough to survive your pro-abortion policies, any liberal platform point is so weak that any rational person sees his point made and won with no effect at all; the lefty simple rattles on to their next talking point without having the good sense to know that they lost.

How can someone have an unreasonable political philosophy that is self-defeating and irrational and still hold their head up as a person of sense? They can’t, and the reason that they appear to do so is because we are mistaking modern day liberalism as a movement of rational thought and philosophy.

It’s not. It’s a religion. More accurately, it’s a cult.

[...]

What can you do?

You can’t reason with a fanatic. The greatest debates are had when there is either no proof, or there is, but one or more sides will simply not listen. We can extol conservative or libertarian values all day long and point out how they are backed up by reality, but, if they are blinded, they will not see.

If Trump wins, do not gloat to these people, for their machine will take a long time to dismantle, and even a headless snake is dangerous. If Clinton wins, do not lament around them either, for you merely mark yourself as a target.

The best thing to do is to get people of the left out of your life the best you can. Friendships can be stopped, and acquaintances through social activities can be distilled down to only interactions of that activity, though you should really ask yourself if a hobby that is shared with liberals is really worth keeping. Same thing with churches, although it is hard to find a church that is still traditional and not yet corrupted by feminism and liberalism.

Work will be a difficult one. We have covered being in a “man’s field” before, and that helps to a degree. Beyond that, simply not speaking with leftist coworkers other than necessary conversations for business should be your goal, and this will go double if you have one for a boss.

Conclusion

We’re in a transitory stage between reasonable and friendly disagreement and open physical violence being the norm. Open sabotage and various legal and illegal acts used by the left against their ideological foes is the order of the day.

We must be hard targets against the hate of the left, as there is nothing that a liberal hates more than a successful, middle-class, white, Christian, straight man. Do not allow them access to any vulnerabilities, but do not draw attention to yourself either. Great forces are at play during these current times, much can be accomplished by simply stepping out of the way at the right time.

Various Incels #sexist incels.co

(GoffSystemQB)

[JFL] IT's resident camwhore admits to fucking her high school bully. (IT FAGS WON'T TOUCH THIS)

high school bullies, i had my share

i've recently encounter one and we had a talk, he apologized for calling me "cow tits" he told me he was passing through some rough times at his home and it was his form of venting, and also liked my boobs

same superficial, narcisistic prick as in HS

Good on bed but besides that, i wouldn't even watch on the same direction as him

She is a walking blackpill and people on that subreddit have the gall to try and deny the blackpill and gaslight us. What clown shit.

Inceltears won't touch this

Added it in the title to try and bait them.

0 points instead of reddit gold Maybe they are finally uncucking kek

Naw a bunch of brocels brigaded the comment downvoting her and laughing at the state of IT and all their posts were deleted.

An addendum she will never fuck an incel which she claims fund her whoredom business. Why is that exactly? Because of looks? You've already proven you will fuck a guy with a terrible personality (self-described by you).

What exactly is the reason you won't fuck an incel?

Well they literally just proved incels right so the incels in denial on there naturally are seething

Post got brigaded and locked after her comment so not quite. Most people on IT didn't even see the comment.

IT touched this:

Also she admitted in the post that the guy didn't change and was still a narcissistic douchebag and that she regrets nothing. Bluepilled incels reading this with confused faces.

.

Sorry to bump my thread again, but a bluepilled incel who browses IT was upset by the post he saw here and reached out to her about it and she told him to "suffer in silence."

What a callous bitch and IT allowing her to post but banning me for having different opinions just proves their entire shitty ideology wrong.

Dunno why he expected anything less from a cam whore. Cam whores are pretty much the worst of the worst women, they see everyone as objects for them to exploit. If you have no immediate monetary gain to them they pretty much wish you didn't exist. They're all bonafide psychopaths, although cucks still give them money for some reason. Only thing I'd ever want to send a cam whore is into a gas chamber.

Who knows there a lot of messed up bluepilled incels with a lot of problems browsing IT. Hopefully he sees that these people aren't out to help him.

(Diocel)

but he have a bad personality, i don't get it, doesn't personality matter ?

(Lonelycel)

Trashes him for the whole post but then says she allowed his penis to enter her private parts

Wtf is wrong with these people...

(Konon)

That's women for you. If you're not a misogynist, you're low IQ.

(mental_out)

Well they literally just proved incels right so the incels in denial on there naturally are seething after spending all their time insisting its totally about personality, while women fuck men they straight up admit they dont like on a personal level

(ShySaxon)

It’s over for IT. Every time they say personality matters, show them this.

(Personalityinkwell)

I remember I made a post about how women fuck bullies and they got all fussy about it.

I was right. Bullies are the cool kids

caamib #fundie caamib.wordpress.com

As I often claim, the entire mainstream modern Western society is a mixture of dogma, insanity and lies.

For example, I am often told that we incels only see women as fuckmeat. And in a sense I can understand those saying it, since it is important to remember that these monsters have no sense of what any relationship is – pumping and dumping is all their parents and friends knew. So it comes of little surprise that they are like this as well – they have no other concepts to even comprehend. When they hear about male-female relationships they hear sex, for nothing else exists to them. It is important to remember that.

Because seeing women as fuckmeat is exactly how thugs, the sacred group worshiped by women, sees them. A thug breeds a woman and then can’t stand her anymore so he goes on to breed the next woman – an optimal behavior in a feral, sick world where relationships are a concept as foreign as halberds or Aztec rituals.

If what these crazies were saying was true about incels they wouldn’t be incels !

So what is the truth?

Incels are often (but not always, there are also completely declined, modernist incels) those who make the mistake of offering women humane treatment, relationship and such things. Things that modern women no longer understand and are thus hated. It is like trying to put a wild animal in a cage. It won’t like the cage nor you. And liberalism is supporting this. Its telling incels that it is wrong to treat women like cattle and that it is good to treat women like they deserve respect. So what happens? Incels do so, fail and then get blamed and told they actually acted like they see women as cattle. But they didn’t! They acted just the way you told them – they treated women like entities worthy of respect. Had they treated them like cattle they’d be successful.

And onwards goes this crazy lie, repacked and sold over and over again, sadly to usually the same naive idiots.

It’s the same with another modernist myth, the idea that modern women don’t like rape.

The only “rapists” sent to prison are falsely accused men who women want to get rid of because they’re not immoral and stupid enough. That is a crime today, not rape. In fact, if you don’t actually rape your chances of being accused of rape are much, much higher.

Honestly, if you’re not able to recognize it by now maybe it is better that you don’t reproduce. I’d just recommend also not working so you don’t make even more men incel, but I fear even that is beyond the comprehension skills of such morons.

[Bolding from original]

Glenn Johnson #conspiracy marlinpals.com

Dear Amnesty International:

I have been neurologically and neuropsychologically interfered with and actually tortured here in the U.S. (and also in Canada, where I previously resided) for over twenty years by what are apparently very many cult agents on the far-right, some of whom claim association with the 'Reverend Moon' cult (although others are represented as well, including radical 'Christian' mind-control agents and the 'Scientology' cult). A few of these agents have, on occasion, professed 'Australian' origins, for which reason I thought I would send you a message, as well (I am sending messages to several Amnesty International branches, including those in Canada and Korea). Over the course of this long ordeal, I have been prevented from making an income excep in the most nominal form and extensive amounts of money have been extorted from my bank account by direct cortical control and resultant actional or behavioural manipulation.

Please do not contact the police about this, as covert 'police' agents on the far-right are most likely involved in my torture and have affiliations with the radical 'Christian' groups responsible. You may access further information concerning this situation by calling up the material at http://www.crosswinds.net/helsinki/~glennpj, a website at which I have established a set of information pages. My e-mail can be found by accessing the page OVER THE HORIZON and then finding your way, via the buttons there, to earlier pages of the website with e-mail links.

These agents have pressured me for technical details (and innovative ideas) associated with such devices as involve Radio-Nucleonic (i.e. Hyperon) Broadcast Amplification, Supersonic, Turbine-driven Plasma Accelerators, Radio-Saturated Hydrogen Condenser Cell Matrices associated with High-Frequency Electro-Charging Armatures and Catalytically Seeded Hydrogen Vapour Pressure Containment of High-Frequency Oscillation/Electro-Charging form (or) of PASER Enhanced form, Such that a Pion-Enriched Thermo-Nuclear Plasma (and Thermo-Nuclear Evaporate) result, as well as Hyperon/Neutron Diffraction (and Fission Containment Lattices) and their role in Primary Thermonuclear Triggering.

They have further attempted to derive from me various aerospace engineering formulations, including that for a Quantum-Mechanically Structured, pi+/pi- Field-Interacting Engine or a Matter/Anti-Matter Field Interacting Engine of Hierarchically Sequential and/or Quantal/Gradiential Type and Resultant, Differential Output or Propulsion, as well as that for the Thermo-Nuclear Pumps designed to energize such a Matter/Anti-Matter Field-Interaction in Bi-Polar or n-Polar Context. Specifically, they have asked me about the feasibility of using such pumps to energize Matter/Anti-Matter Collider (Field) Processes which are involved in the formulation of this propulsion technique.

The American underworld agents appear to have FIXED the local Amnesty International chapter and other 'help' organizations. These people will not be in position or capacity to believe that 'anything is wrong' here and this is in fact the plan on the far-right; to subvert and neutralize any available assistance to the left. Most chapter members are drawn from artificially fixed or guided population elements. For all I know, the KKK or a similar right-wing organization may even control the local chapter in the background - subtle disguise is the most important part of right-wing puppet-agent operations. They have already proven to me that they can imitate the left and the far-left so that it is possible they can artificially construct and guide pseudo-left-wing agents and even center agencies such as Amnesty, including agents of the American Civil Liberties Union, for example.

Thanks for your considerations

Glenn Johnson

Creep #fundie incels.co

Everyone Subconciously knows the blackpill is true

Normies, cucks, foids, etc know that men get shit for their looks.

When a man claims to have trouble getting women, at best norm-scum will tell him he needs to just "put himself out there more" or have a better personality. They will tell him to go to fucking salsa dances to pick up girls, lmao.

But yet subreddits such as r/beholdthemasterrace, r/neckbeards, every cringe subreddit, etc show that the problem is not that they aren't going to community service purely to look for girls to pick up, its their looks. That is the point of all those subreddits, to make fun of ugly men.

I remember seeing this thread where Vman took Weeds pic, painted a racist quote, then put it in 2 cringe subreddits. Can you guess what all the comments were? it was ALL making fun of his looks, saying he is a virgin loser, etc. Why the fuck would people insult him like that if looks didn't matter??

Because looks obviously is the dominant factor in your sexual attractiveness. It is THE most important thing about a person, male or female. Insult a mans looks, you insult his life.
image
Everybody gets the impression that this man would be a virgin loser, and it is 100% from his looks. Get a guy who looks like Michael Cera and everyone would think he is a total pussy.

Everybody knows that obnoxious guys are far bigger slayers than nice guys, because everyone knows the thugpill is true. "Good personality" is just nonsense thrown around so the person saying it appears less shallow, when in reality they are only signaling to the blackpilled that they are less honest.

All these studies we post is really "water is wet" content. Nobody needs a fucking study to know that the guy who I posted above is basically screwed over in the dating scene, no matter what they fucking say. Everyone knows that virgins are uglier and shorter than chads. Just look at what they post when its a thread about an ugly man
"geez no wonder why he is so sexist. He must never get attention from girls due to all that acne. What a loser LOL"

Being blackpilled simply means that you refuse to look away from the truth and pretend that it isn't extremely obvious.

Sinclair Jenkins & Kajsa Norman #racist amren.com

The Swedish Unimind

Marcellus famously said to Horatio, “Something is rotten in the state of Denmark.” Fortunately for today’s Danes, their politicians care about their citizens. This year the Danish Social Democrats, headed by Mette Frederiksen, blunted the rising power of the nationalist Danish People’s Party by co-opting their restrictionist immigration platform, and won over 25 percent of the vote. A young, left-wing female prime minister was poised to oversee a new era of nationalism.

Although the American media questioned Miss Frederiksen’s left-wing credentials, her party was returning to its roots. Before multiculturalism, labor unions throughout the West promoted strict immigration policies to protect workers against cheap “scab” labor. In the United States, Irish-born firebrand Denis Kearney called the Chinese immigrant a “cheap working slave.” There could be no compromise. In 1878 he said, “California must be all American or all Chinese” [1].

Europe’s social democratic parties pursued similar immigration restrictions. Harold Wilson’s government damaged Great Britain, but his Labour administration drafted a white paper in early 1965 that tried to curb immigration from Commonwealth countries. Had it been acted on, Enoch Powell’s “Rivers of Blood” speech three years later would have been unnecessary. In the 1970s, even the French Communist Party emphasized immigration control.

Sadly for the people of Sweden, their Social Democratic Party (SAP) lack the courage either to follow the Danes or to admit that their nation’s generous welfare state is on the brink of collapse due to unchecked immigration.

Journalist and former member of the Swedish Armed Forces, Kajsa Norman, discusses Sweden’s decline in her book Sweden’s Dark Soul, which was translated into English earlier this year. So far, it has received almost no press in the United States. The reason is obvious: Miss Norman exposes Sweden as an oppressive state of social democratic conformity that deals cruelly with dissenters. Miss Norman has a name for Sweden’s spiritual tyranny: the “Unimind.”

The book begins with Saturday, August 15, 2015. On that day, thousands of teenagers gathered inside Stockholm’s Kungstradgarden Park for the pop-music We Are Sthlm festival. Billed as a safe, family-friendly event, the day turned sour when hundreds of young men — the vast majority were Afghan and Somali immigrants — began molesting any girl they could find. They held down some of the victims and shoved fingers into their vaginas. The police and private security detained at least 90 suspects, but let them all go. A middle-aged police psychologist named Hans decided to send Dagens Nyheter, one of Sweden’s major publications, a first-hand account. Even though Hans saw that the perpetrators were foreigners, his initial email to the newspaper said nothing about race because he feared he would “be branded a racist” [2].

The story of the mass assaults was not made public until Saturday, January 9, 2016, nearly five months later. Fed up with the apathy of the mainstream media, Hans took his story to Chang Frick, an independent, Jewish-Gypsy journalist who first made a name for himself in 2013 by documenting riots in the immigrant-heavy suburb of Husby that the Swedish media ignored. Rioters shouted “Allahu Akbar!” and fought off firefighters with a hail of stones [3]. Mr. Frick’s Nyheter Idag not only broke the news on what had happened at the festival; it reported that authorities had been covering up We Are Sthlm assaults for at least a decade.

As Miss Norman writes, a few independent media outlets later noted other facts about mass immigration:

Young girls and women have been sexually assaulted in public swimming pools, parks, subways, and schools, and on buses. For many young people, this has been a part of everyday life, something one just has to learn to live with. In the 2016 Swedish Crime Survey, 14 per cent of 16- to 24-year-olds reported that they had been subjected to a sex offence [sic] that same year. In 2007, there were 12,563 reported sex offences [sic], including 4,749 rapes. By 2016, that number has grown to 20,284 reported sex offences [sic], including 6,715 rapes [4].

The mainstream media reacted by accusing Nyheter Idag of xenophobia. They tried to cast the story as one of police incompetence, noting correctly that Swedish police officials barred officers from investigating the crimes. Months before the same accusation became common in the United States, the Swedish establishment accused Mr. Frick and his website of being a mouthpiece for Russian disinformation [5].

This was not surprising coming from the elite media cartel. As Miss Norman points out, in Sweden, the media and the government have a close relationship dating back to the 1960s. Olof Palme, later to be murdered on the streets of Stockholm, spent his time as minister of education using television to “educate the population and convey the correct opinions” [6]. Between the 1960s and early 1990s, publicly owned television networks provided the bulk of news and entertainment to Swedes. Most programs championed left-liberal causes, from anti-colonial movements to feminism. And in Sweden, public shaming and ostracism — punishments typical of a feminized society — are very powerful.

In many respects, Sweden is not like other nations. Miss Norman writes that “according to research projects such as the World Values Survey (WVS), no other country deviates more from the global norm” [7]. Sweden is the least traditional country on Earth; in Sweden, extreme positions on sex equality, abortion, and families are common. The Swedish Unimind, which sees itself as the pinnacle of human achievement, does not permit deviation, but, as those who broke the silence about the We Are Sthlm assaults prove, the Unimind can be broken.

Sweden’s Dark Soul is less about collapse due to immigration and more about how, for almost 100 years, the Social Democrats created a false utopia and millions of citizen sycophants. It is a vivid demonstration of the problems of unchecked central power. The first Swedish centralizer, King Gustav Vasa (1496 – 1560), nationalized the Lutheran church [8] and created the first professional Swedish army and navy. This paved the way for the legendary Gustav II Adolf (Gustavus Adolphus) and the creation of the Swedish Empire. Until the late 19th century, long after the days of Swedish hegemony in the Baltic, “90 percent of Swedish taxes went to the Armed Forces” [9]. Statism, heavy taxation, and enforced opinions combined to create today’s Folkhemmet, or “people’s home.”

Swedes practiced collectivism long before the Social Democrats came to power in the 1930s, but it was the SAP that re-engineered Swedish society by giving power to left-wing technocrats. In 1934, racial hygiene laws were introduced to perform sterilizations on the mentally disabled, chronically ill, and those with “undesirable character traits” such as promiscuity, laziness, and alcoholism [10]. Alva and Gunnar Myrdal, who later won fame in Sweden promoting nuclear disarmament and the destruction of the nuclear family (Gunnar Myrdal also supervised the compilation of the hugely influential An American Dilemma), enthusiastically supported the sterilization of “anti-social” people [11].

After two decades of eugenics, the Swedish state decided to promote itself abroad as a “moral superpower.” A large part of this morality was an open immigration policy. In 1973, Sweden took in refugees from Chile after the military coup that ousted Salvador Allende. In 1979, thousands more entered Sweden from Iran after the fall of the Shah. Despite polls indicating that a plurality of Swedish citizens did not want more immigrants [12], the state decided to purge the country of “superstition and ignorance” [13]. In 1975, the Swedish Parliament wrote multiculturalism into law: “immigrants and minorities should decide for themselves to what extent they wished to be assimilated” [14].

Immigrants from Africa and the Middle East are four and three times, respectively, more likely to commit crimes than native-born Swedes [15]. Sweden has a higher percentage of foreign-born citizens than almost any other country in Europe, and rape, bombings, and shootings have become common. The “moral superpower,” which gave $550,000 in aid to the Viet Cong and $443 million to the African National Congress, is destroying itself.

As part of the Unimind, both the Social Democrats and the supposedly conservative Moderate Party parrot each other on the need to accept as many “migrants” as possible. The Unimind blames the patriarchy — not immigrants — for the rise in sex crimes. The Unimind believes that dismantling ancient Swedish tradition of free speech is more important than protecting the people or grappling with the truth. Sweden can be likened to a dictatorship of National Public Radio producers.

Sweden has become a nation of materialism, extreme egalitarianism, with a culture of shaming. Although Miss Norman does note that the Swedish mindset can turn quickly, and that the nationalist Swedish Democrats are winning more votes, Sweden’s Dark Soul reads like an epitaph. In the United States, if demographic change continues and the Democrats become as powerful as the SAP, we will become like Sweden, though far more violent.

Phyllis Chesler #fundie meforum.org

<table>

It's become fashionable to draw comparisons between the popular television adaptation of Margaret Atwood's The Handmaid's Tale and Donald Trump's America.

It's become fashionable to draw comparisons between the popular television adaptation of Margaret Atwood's The Handmaid's Tale and Donald Trump's America.

Margaret Atwood, whose work I have long admired, is now being hailed as a prophet. It is quite the phenomenon. According to the pundits, Atwood's 1985 work, The Handmaid's Tale, which Mary McCarthy once savaged, and the recently-published 2019 sequel, The Testaments, are dystopias which aptly describe the contemporary climate change crisis, toxic environments, the rise in infertility, and the enslavement of women in Trump's America.

Is this all Atwood is writing about? Do the increasing restrictions on abortion in America parallel the extreme misogyny of Gilead, the theocratic state in Atwood's saga? Is the unjust separation of mothers and children, a la Trump on the southern border, what Atwood has foretold? Every review and interview with Atwood that I could find strongly insists that this is the case.

Michelle Goldberg, in the New York Times, attributes the current popularity of The Handmaid's Tale to Trump's ascendancy. She writes: "It's hardly surprising that in 2016 the book resonated—particularly women—stunned that a brazen misogynist, given to fascist rhetoric and backed by religious fundamentalists was taking power."

<table>

Gilead-inspired handmaid outfits have become popular at anti-Trump rallies as far away as Poland.

Gilead-inspired handmaid outfits have become popular at anti-Trump rallies as far away as Poland.

... At the anti-Trump pro-women's rights marches around the country, some feminist protesters dressed like Handmaids in billowing, shapeless red dresses, their facial identities obscured by large, white Victorian-era bonnets, carrying signs that read: "Make Margaret Atwood fiction again" and "The Handmaid's Tale is not an instruction manual."

They have a point. Abortion rights are being steadily challenged and nearly eviscerated in the formerly slave-owning American states. Right-to-life lawyers insist that the protection of unborn children without any gestational markers is the law of the land. We now have free states and slave states in terms of access to high quality, insurance-funded abortions. Pregnant, drug-addicted women are being jailed for child abuse.

<table>

Gilead most reflects what is happening not in America, but in most Islamic countries.

Gilead most reflects what is happening not in America, but in most Islamic countries.

However ... [t]here's another contemporary parallel that also gets scant attention. Gilead's system of pseudo-theocratic totalitarian control in both her novels and in the MGM/Hulu versions does not accurately reflect what is happening in America today; it mirrors what is happening in most Islamic countries, a fact that Atwood and her admirers are too politically correct to notice.

Obscuring one's individual identity, masking one's face, sequestering women at home, may have been true of many previous cultures and regimes. However, in this day forced niqabs (face veils) and burqas (head, face, and body bags) are mainly realities for women in Muslim countries and communities in the West. In Iran in July, three women were sentenced to a total of 55 years between them for protesting against the veil.

<table>

In July 2019, an Iranian court sentenced Yasaman Aryani (left), Monireh Arabshahi (center), and Mojgan Keshavarz to a total of 55 years in prison for protesting against the veil.

In July 2019, an Iranian court sentenced Yasaman Aryani (left), Monireh Arabshahi (center), and Mojgan Keshavarz to a total of 55 years in prison for protesting against the veil.

In The Handmaid's Tale Atwood does mention Islam twice (to exonerate Muslims as the suspected mass murderers of Congress, the Supreme Court, and the Oval Office in Gilead (p.174) and again in a reference to the "obsession with harems" on the part of allegedly Orientalist Western painters who did not understand that they were painting "boredom" (p.69). Atwood's quintessential Bad Guys are Caucasian, Bible-thumping, right wing, conservative, American Christians.

Where else but in the Islamic world do we see forced face veiling, forced child marriage, women confined to the home, polygamy (a "wife" and a "handmaid" under the same roof), male guardians and minders, cattle prod shocking, whipping, hand amputations, stoning, crazed vigilante mobs stomping and tearing people apart, and tortured corpses publicly displayed on city walls or hanging from cranes in order to terrify the populace? Or the torture murder of homosexuals? This is how Al-Qaeda, ISIS, Boko Haram, the Islamic Republics of Iran and Afghanistan, the tyrants of Somalia and Saudi Arabia, interpret, correctly or incorrectly, Sharia law.

How could all the reviewers not see what I so clearly see? Perhaps here's how.

I once lived in a harem in Afghanistan—a harem simply means the "women's quarters." It is forbidden territory to all men who are not relatives. If you can't leave without permission or without a male escort, you are in a harem and living in purdah.

<table>

"I once lived in a harem ... the property of a polygamous Afghan family."

"I once lived in a harem ... the property of a polygamous Afghan family."

After a 30-month courtship, I married the glamorous, wealthy, very Westernized, foreign student whom I first met at college when I was 18. We never once discussed religion. Not a word about Islam. He had not prepared me for what life would be like in his country, even temporarily. For example, he had never even mentioned that his father had three wives and 21 children, that most Afghan women still wore burqas or heavy hijab, that I would be pressured to convert to Islam, and would have to live with my mother-in-law.

When we landed in Kabul, officials smoothly removed my American passport—which I never saw again. Suddenly, I was the citizen of no country and had no rights. I had become the property of a polygamous Afghan family. I was not allowed out without a male escort, a male driver, and a female relative as my chaperones.

This marriage had transported me back to the 10th Century and trapped me there without a passport back to the future.

I experienced what it was like to live with people who were permanently afraid of what other people might think—even more so than in Small Mind Town, USA.

<table>

Read more about the author's captivity in Afghanistan in her acclaimed 2013 book.

Read more about the author's captivity in Afghanistan in her acclaimed 2013 book.

I was terrified when I first saw women wearing ghostly burqas—ambulatory body bags, sensory deprivation isolation chambers—huddled together literally at the back of the bus. My Afghan family laughed at my over-reaction, which was considered abnormal, not their practice of burying women alive.

My dreamer-of-a husband kept assuring me that the dreadful burqa and my captivity would both soon pass. He lived to see this dream come true for about 15 years for the middle classes until it was shattered again, perhaps forever.

Many Afghan women have mothers-in-law who beat them and treat them as despised servants. Mine never hit me or ordered me to cook or clean, but she tried to convert me to Islam every single day and tried to kill me by telling the servants to stop boiling my water and washing my fruits and vegetables. I got deathly ill.

Poor woman, she was a deserted and much maligned first wife. She feared me, envied me, hated me—as a woman, an infidel, a Jew, an American, and mainly, as a "love match," something considered too dangerously Western. Afghan mothers-in-law do collaborate in or even perpetrate the honor/horror killings of their daughters and daughters-in-law. So do rural India-based Hindu mothers and mothers-in-law, Muslim mothers and mothers-in-law world-wide, and Sikhs, to a lesser extent.

I got out of the wild, wild East and I moved on. But I never forgot the way it was. I always understood that as imperfect as America and the West might be, it was still a much better place for women than the Islamic world. Forever after, I understood that barbaric customs are indigenous, not caused by foreign intervention; and that, like the West, Islam was also an imperial and colonial power, owned slaves, and engaged in gender and religious apartheid.

I owe Afghanistan a great deal for teaching me this. Perhaps my radical Western feminism was forged long ago in pampered purdah in Kabul.

Islamic or Islamist totalitarianism today and as I knew it nearly 60 years ago in Kabul is the more obvious face of Gilead than the one imagined by Atwood more than 30 years ago.

Like the handmaids and domestics in Gilead, the captive population in Orwell's 1984 is monitored around the clock through "telescreens" that can view every room, each person. The telescreens broadcast Big Brother's orders and conduct daily "hate" sessions. People are always anxious and paranoid; everyone has permanent enemies.

Today, Orwell's Thought Police sound a lot like the Afghan Taliban or like Iran's or Saudi Arabia's Virtue­ and-Vice squads, who arrest men and women for the smallest sign of "individuality" or difference, and who harass and arrest women for showing a single strand of hair, or a glimpse of ankle. Here's Khaled Hosseini's fictional description of life in Afghanistan under the Soviets in The Kite Runner:

You couldn't trust anyone in Kabul anymore—for a fee or under threat, people told on each other, neighbor on neighbor, child on parent, brother on brother, servant on master, friend on friend...the rafiqs, the [Afghan] comrades, were everywhere and they'd split Kabul into two groups: those who eavesdropped and those who didn't...A casual remark to the tailor while getting fitted for a suit might land you in the dungeons of Poleh-charkhi...Even at the dinner table, in the privacy of their own home, people had to speak in a calculated manner—the rafiqs were in the classrooms too; they'd taught children to spy on their parents, what to listen for, whom to tell.

And here he is describing Afghanistan in the Taliban era:

In Kabul, fear is everywhere, in the streets, in the stadiums, in the markets, it is a part of our lives here...the savages who rule our watan [country] don't care about human decency. The other day, I accompanied Farzanajan to the bazaar to buy some potatoes and naan. She asked the vendor how much the potatoes cost, but he did not hear her, I think he had a deaf ear. So she asked louder and suddenly a young Talib ran over and hit her on the thighs with his wooden stick. He struck her so hard she fell down. He was screaming at her and cursing and saying the Ministry of Vice and Virtue does not allow women to speak loudly. She had a large purple bruise on her leg for days...If I fought, that dog would have surely put a bullet in me, and gladly!

Hosseini's descriptions are right out of 1984 or The Handmaid's Tale.

Two memoirs set in Iran, Azar Nafisi's best-selling Reading Lolita in Tehran and Roya Hakakian's Journey from the Land of No, describe the savage curtailment of private life and thought—and of life itself—by radical Islamists.

<table>

Two compelling accounts of life for women in Iran's Islamic Republic.

Two compelling accounts of life for women in Iran's Islamic Republic.

According to Nafisi, Khomeini's goon squads closed news­papers and universities and arrested, tortured, and executed beloved teachers, prominent artists, intellectuals, and activists, including feminists, and thousands of other innocent and productive Muslims. The squads constantly harassed women on the street and at work. If a woman failed the dress-code standards even slightly, or by accident, she risked being arrested, probably raped, probably executed.

In Journey from the Land of No, Roya Hakakian describes the in­describable "Mrs. Moghadam," the newly-installed head of the Jewish girls' high school. Mrs. Moghadam tyrannizes, terrifies, and shames the Jewish girls. She tries to convert them to Islam. However, her true passion is more Talibanesque. She informs the innocent girls that, although they do not know it, they are "diabolical," "abominable," "loathsome," "lethal," capable of "drowning everything in eternal dark­ness," capable of bringing the "apocalypse" by showing a single strand of hair. To Hakakian's credit, she presents a rather dangerous turn of events as a dark comedy.

Mrs. Moghadam is definitely an Aunt Lydia, the lead female tormentor of the Handmaids, right out of Gilead, circa 1985.

<table>

Many Western feminists mistakenly see the face veil and head scarf as symbols of anti-racism.

Many Western feminists mistakenly see the face veil and head scarf as symbols of anti-racism.

As Muslim women are being tortured, honor-murdered by their families, or stoned to death, sometimes for refusing to wear the veil, many Western multiculturally and politically correct post-colonial feminists are deconstructing and wearing the face veil and the head scarf as symbols of anti-racism and as a form of respect when they visit Muslim countries. Such feminists are also silencing and demonizing all other views in academic journals, in the media, and on feminist internet groups.

I've written about this many times. Therefore, while I know that violence against women still remains a burning issue in the West, I agree with Allison Pearson's recent article in The Spectator: "The appalling vanity of Western Feminists who think Margaret Atwood writes about them."

Atwood depicts an all-female power structure in which the handmaids are kept in line by cruel female "Aunts," led by Aunt Lydia, who casually apply cattle prods and tasers, who blame them as evil sluts, punish them with group condemnation, bouts of solitary confinement, exile them to the "Colonies" to die cleaning up toxic waste, etc. Such behavior seems to contradict feminist views of women as morally superior to men and as more compassionate and intuitive.

<table>

Aunt Lydia (left) and the al-Khansa Brigade of ISIS

Aunt Lydia (left) and the al-Khansa Brigade of ISIS

Like men, women are human beings and as such are as close to the apes as to the angels. Women are also aggressive, cruel, competitive, envious, sometimes lethally so, but mainly toward other women. I would not want to be at the mercy of a female prison guard—or a female concentration camp guard—in the West. But let's not forget the Wives of ISIS—the all-femaleal-Khansaa Brigade who whipped, beat, and mutilated the breasts of girls and women when their heavy black burqas slipped. Displaced ISIS women continue their anti-woman reign of terror.

Misogynist thinking and actions exist in America today but not only among right-wing conservatives. It is also flourishing among our media and academic elites. Such thinking is flying high under the banner of "free speech," "multi-cultural relativism," "anti-racism," and "political correctness." Dare to question this elite's right to silence and shame those who challenge their views—i.e., that the West is always to blame, that jihadists are freedom-fighters, that the Islamic face veil is a free choice or a religious commandment, that polygamy encourages sisterhood, that Islam is a race, not a religious and political ideology—and, as I've noted many times, one is attacked as a racist, an Islamophobe, and a conservative, and swiftly demonized and de-platformed.

While MGM/Hulu's TV series is dramatically compelling, part soap opera, part horror movie, part Warrior Queen fantasy, the series is radically different from Atwood's 1985 novel. For example, Atwood's narrator, Ofglen, is not an increasingly daring, crazed, female assassin, as Elizabeth Moss brilliantly plays her. She is hardly heroic at all; under totalitarianism, heroism, collective or individual, is quickly ferreted out and destroyed. It exists but is rare.

Contemporary viewers are hungry for multi-racial characters, interracial and same-sex couples, "badass" women. Hulu gives them to us. Hulu's Canada is a multi-racial, politically correct refuge for Gilead's escapees; same-sex couples and feminists are government leaders. This is not true in the novel. On the contrary, in her 1985 Epilogue, Atwood has Canada rounding up and returning all Gilead escapees.

<table>

Media and academic elites are playing partisan politics with Atwood's original vision.

Media and academic elites are playing partisan politics with Atwood's original vision.

Atwood the divine novelist is absolutely entitled to depict whatever she wishes. But the current crop of reviewers as well as the filmmakers are playing partisan politics with her original vision and are refusing to see other and larger global dangers contained in her work.

Women's freedom and women's lives worldwide are under the most profound siege. To focus solely on the United States or on the Caucasian, Judeo-Christian West is diversionary. It scapegoats one country, one culture, for the far greater crimes of other countries and cultures.

Phyllis Chesler, a Shillman-Ginsburg Fellow at the Middle East Forum, is an emerita professor of psychology and women's studies and the author of eighteen books, including Women and Madness, Woman's Inhumanity to Woman, An American Bride in Kabul, and A Politically Incorrect Feminist.

Notes:

[1]Commercial surrogacy has been outlawed in India, Thailand, parts of Mexico, Malaysia, and South Africa, as well as in many European countries including Austria, Belgium, France, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, and the UK. Hence, the campaign to legalize commercial surrogacy in America has gathered momentum.

[2] Contemporary surrogacy has now become a way of slicing and dicing biological motherhood into three parts: an egg donor, who undergoes painful and dangerous IVF procedures; a "gestational" mother who faces all the risks of pregnancy, childbirth, and potentially negative and lifelong medical and psychiatric consequences; and an adoptive mother or father. This vivisection of motherhood makes it impossible for a birthmother to win custody for any reason.

jimotree #fundie incels.co

Firearms are one of the best hobby for an incel

Let me explain, firearms and firearm culture is almost exclusively male, even if you are ugly or deformed it does not matter as the other guys at the range/store don’t care how you look,(beyond you know not being literally covered in filth.). They just care about your guns/skill with said guns, so no need to worry about getting #metoo by some thot,

Second every gun you own makes no-gun normies reeee just a little bit more, they already don’t like us because we’re incels and now they also don’t like us for owning guns, guns that we can use to defend ourselves with,(even if that is not an ‘official’ reason to own a gun in your country.)

Third: there just a lot of fun, they evoke an almost ‘primal’ sensation/euphoria when using them, something that we incels rarely get to feel.

Fourth: if you’re going to Hero it makes it so much easier/ effective (no matter style of ‘hero’ your going to do,(I.e private or public/ large scale hero.))

LeninistSkynet & Votetojudge #sexist reddit.com

Re: At least I’m not an incel right ?... Nothing to do with the fact that I’m 5”3 btw

(LeninistSkynet)
These people are cult members. They remind me of people who would willingly commit suicide if their cult member wants them to do it. Their leaders are women, of course. I mean, JFL. Late 20's, kissless virgin manlet who unironically uses "toxic and problematic" --- he can never be more than an asexual handbag for women and a an accessory they use to virtue signal. This is why we must spread incel consciouness.

(Votetojudge)
The "cult" is the women are wonderful effect.

Anything that validates the women are wonderful effect and makes women seem empathetic, deep, caring of pers0nality, ect. is supported by them automatically without thought, regardless of its basis in truth.

Anything that conflicts with the women are wonderful effect and exposes women as primarily shallow, materialistic, and status seeking is automatically disputed or flat out denied without thought or care for its relevance to reality.

Women themselves can literally, by the thousands, say or do things that directly prove or support the blackpill, and indoctrinated women are wonderful effect cult members will STILL deny it emphatically and/or make excuses to protect the idea that women are better than they are.

Various incels #sexist reddit.com

Foids can't be incel

image

(ABannedIncel9)
JFL femcels is not a thing. CEL STANDS FOR CELIBATE. Fucking celibate. Name yourself something else you losers

(theworstworld)
That's what I have thought. Why don't they create a new term for themselves? Or I thought that, until someone reminded me "Men are the inventors, women are the leeches."

(MRinvalidusername)
They literally cuda just made a sub for single women with single women "problems" instead of hijacking what the incels have created, whilst not even being fucking CELIBATE AND truly ALONE

(TheVantablackPill)
Women are stupid & retarded and only know how to leech off popularity of other people & groups. They will always try to take the attention in towards themselves and until a bigger group comes with a worse name they will call themselves femcels.

(theworstworld)
"I have met plenty of men that get between 5-50 matches. I have 2600 matches. I don't know if this is embarrassingly low." Hahaha! I never realized foids were this stupid until I found this sub!

(Ohrami420)
And she’ll deny men have it harder in dating

(MRinvalidusername)
A handicapped, disease ridden, drooling, mentally degraded dog looks less stupid compared to these femcels

(Salusa-Secundus)
She just skips over that, even if her 90% thing is legit, that leaves ALMOST THREE HUNDRED POTENTIAL PARTNERS. And that's an ugly girl.

(justforlulzandkeks)
Women literally, unironically, without exaggeration, CANNOT comprehend male loneliness

they can have shit like hundreds of tinder matches, talking to dozens of guys, and they STILL won't count it because of this or that reason

Female rationalization is MIND BOGGLING

(R706)
Complain 90% of men on dating apps only want sex, while only wanting the most attractive men themselves and would cheat on their life partner for Chad at the drop of a hat.

Also she's fucking stupid as tinder was only ever intended to be a hookup app, it's just idiots like her treating it as a dating platform because they flock like sheep to whatever the popular thing is and try and twist into something that works for them.

A bit like how on every other MMO one time people developed the catchphrase "Go back to World of Warcraft", because they'd just want the same thing, but different.

There may not have even been any point to her post, it might just be her humble bragging about her matches.

(looksmaxxedcurrycel)
2591 matches. That doesnt even include the guys she swiped left on, who swiped right on her. JFL. Meanwhile, the only time i ever get matches on tinder is if i change preferences to men.

(Disappointedshorty)
This is not even funny anymore. I want her to fucking die.

Some incels #sexist reddit.com

"People keep hiring me just cuz I'm a WOMAN."

image

(PvtJamesRyan)
I’ve been telling everyone that most Job ads are fake and only there to fish for women since 2010 and no one, not even incels, believed me. And no I’m not even talking about female quotas here, I’m saying that when you have a thirsty male boss (which is 99% of companies) he is only putting out job ads so that women can apply in the hopes that he can get laid with her. When you look at a job ad, Don’t for even one second think that he would be interested in hiring a man like YOU, Because they’re all putting out jobs only to look for pussy. I am also saying that if you are a man, you will need to apply maybe a hundred times before you even get a job, but a woman of similar or even lower skill set than you can get instantly hired because the moment the boss looks at her long legs, he will dump your Male resume in the trash and hire her on the spot. All that effort you put into uni, it’s worth nothing when compared to stacys looks. As an entrepreneur who’s been around the block for several years, I’ve been in the market long enough to know this shit is irrefutable. Anyone who still believes women should get economic help despite all their overwhelming economic advantages is a mentally retarded cuck who knows nothing about the world (I’m looking at you inceltears).

(refuseRoasties)
Foids in STEM live life on tutorial mode. They are there to keep the thirsty numale wagecucks in check by dangling their hot female coworker carrot in front of them for this one special time of the day when she will give them some bits of chit-chat at the coffee machine.

Most career women don't know shit besides looking good in formal clothing. HR foids are the worst, giving weekly talks about team building and communication to hordes of soyboys gathering in airconditioned wageslave pits... JFL at the wage gap ! Many of them earn more than the hard working incels in the departments deeper down the hierarchy where the actual hard work happens.

(pzezson)
So fucking true it hurts man. I've worked in IT and it's hilarious watching all the hordes of subhuman curries who I work with lust after the one young white chick in our department who's a scrum master. And the funny thing is that hoe doesn't know jack shit about programming but makes more than a curry or rice who had to grind their way through uni learning CS only to do grunt work fixing bugs and working on tickets and shit grinding 9 - 5 everyday only to make less than the hoe who only needs to show up to work to look pretty. JFL AT THIS FUCKING LIFE

(PvtJamesRyan)
And even if they break out of the rat race like those curries who invented tinder or that ricecel who invented snapchat, they will still end up orbiting around that one white chick in their new startup office and then getting metooed a year later, and then the chick goes off to start her own startup. I’m talking about bumble.

(AnyGoal)
all the boomer males do this shit too. i mean fuck at least the numales are in their age range and have a tiny chance of being beta bucks. most of the boomers have absolutely no chance, not even to run sugar daddy game, they're just too old and ugly, yet they'll still try to get these women into their workplace just to create an infinitesimal delusional increase in sexual opportunity in their lives.

(PvtJamesRyan)
Yes and that’s the reason why men don’t get any replies when they apply for jobs. Sorry mate, it’s not because we are not a good match for the company, it’s becuase we don’t have a pussy which is what the horny deadbedroom male boss is really looking for. Also, a lot of HR are women who are literally looking for good looking men to hire. I know this because I have overheard their conversations, where they receive a resume with a photo of a good looking man and they clamour to hire him.

WizardofSoda #sexist #racist #crackpot incels.co

RE: [Brutal] Even baby ricelets can't escape the dickmog

Should the definition of micropenis vary according to ethnicity?

Conclusion: Mean penile length and diameter are slightly but significantly smaller in newborns of Chinese origin compared to newborns of Caucasian and East-Indian origins.

Yeah seems to be a correlation with frame, dick size & intelligence. Big body, big dick = No need to hit the books.

Small frame, small dick = Not getting any attention so better get smart to betabux later.

Just add genetics into offspring & there you go.

Ya I see Asians always thinking one day if they get good enough grades, get a high paying enough job, then they can be marriage material.. and then they can get sex.

Big dick guys have their dick 8 inches up inside hot young girls/women right now, they aren't waiting until sometime in the future.

Add to my post: This study could be seen as positive though.. if micropenis babies are identified young they could potentially be given drugs to help grow their penis while they are still children.

And then when there is a defined disease and therefore market just waiting for new and more powerful drugs, that puts money on the line for the pharmaceutical industry to do big time research.

Whereas if something is not defined as a disease, just hey the guy has a small dick.. that means insurers public and private are not going to cover expensive drugs & doctor visits for treatment.

In time the norm will be pathetic short tiny dick man with great job financing foid & her oogabooga retard sports star bulls, cuck gets to hold her hand at most & feel needed.

Paying to exist in her presence.

Those low IQ, uncurious oogaboogas are more relatable to women.. more operate on a primal emotional level. I think to most women the logical minded, analytical man is almost like an alien species that she doesn't want to be around except they have money.

Cope, only female concerns are considered worthy of curing.

No wonder aspies struggle with women.

The female mind in it's natural state is that of a man with schizophrenia.

That is a good way to describe it. One gender will be the logical gender and the other therefore will be the irrational gender.

I think what women want when they are with a guy is that emotional experiences of all the emotions. So a childlike minded Chad who goes from one emotion to the next and really goes deep into the emotion I think is the experience women enjoy.

But the unemotional autist trying to rationalize things with a woman its just cringe and she is not enjoying it at all so leaves very quickly, as she is not getting those emotional highs.

Schizophrenia - Hearing & seeing things, delusional, ruled by emotions, paranoid, out of control emotional response, spontaneous, out of control.

Aspie - Desire to understand things at the technical level, predictable, does not like change, can spend much time doing one thing, does not show emotions externally the way expected, restrained.

What you said makes sense, a good looking guy with the mind, responsibility & foresight of a child that goes with the flow, gets into trouble, is a pleasure seeker to the detriment of all else & turns violent when he stops getting his own way. Oh but he's so fun, until he's not & now you have to pay 10x what you got out. Long term shit for short term pleasure then some cuck is expected to man up & take on that burden in his 30's.

Watching women I notice they just want to experience their emotions.. the worst is some autist explaining the reasoning behind peoples emotional responses to a woman which then reduces the purity and intensity of the experience and therefore the women is extremely resistant to listening to that line of logic.

I think women respond so out of control with emotions because they get a high/pleasure from it.. so you can never really stop people from doing something they are getting so much enjoyment from.

Its like how women always seek to create conflict and dramas.. its for the adrenaline high and the feeling of intense emotions. As women also don't really generate emotions by themselves they feel the emotions of men around them and then it sort of gets amplified by the woman.

Like Schizophrenics women also think everything is about them, that everyone is thinking about them and judging them all the time.

David J. Stewart #fundie jesusisprecious.org

Please do not be deceived. Many Catholics are dying in Sri Lanka, but they are NOT Christians. The U.S. media is really promoting the killings, which makes me very suspicious. Any time that the mainstream media shoves something in my face, over and over, I am doubtful and suspicious. Why are they promoting this? I did read that some liberals and leftists are calling fun stricter gun control in Sri Lanka, which is ALWAYS a really bad idea! Citizens need guns, without which we have no way of defending ourselves against government tyranny. IT CAN HAPPEN HERE! Never let the government take your guns! Never!!!

I am leery about anything and everything that I hear from the newsmedia nowadays. Pastor Jack Hyles used to wisely say that the only thing you can believe from the newsmedia is the date! That is so true! America has been under demonic attack for decades, and we are losing the war! Thankfully, Jesus told us in John 16:33 to, “BE OF GOOD CHEER,” because He has already overcome the world, and we have a beautiful unshakable hope in the blessed Savior, which the world does not! If you are a Roman Catholic, I am sad to say that you are going straight to burn in Hell the moment you leave this earthly life. And then you will also die the second death according to Revelation 21:8, “But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.” Many beautiful people have come and gone, rich and poor alike, but they all went to either Heaven or Hell. The choice is yours alone to make my friend. It's either the Good News of Jesus Christ crucified, buried and risen (without works), or the tormentuous fires of Hell forever! The “Gospel” is only truly Good News if you believe it apart from all human effort, religious devotion and works!

For years now I have been researching famous people and their religious beliefs, out of curiosity. It is truly sad how gullible people are. The sad thing is that if you ask people why they believe what they believe, most of them cannot tell you, except to say that it was the tradition they grew up with, or it makes sense to them, or some other lame excuse. Forget all that! I believe what I believe simply because I have it IN WRITING in the inspired Word of God! I have something solid to base my beliefs upon, besides manmade tradition, family tradition, it feels good, or it makes sense. A lot of people don't even have a reason for their beliefs, except that they simply choose to belong to a particular fun or interesting group, like Seventh-Day Adventists. The group are big on taking care of your physical health, which greatly appeals to a lot of people. They are also big on music, another strong attraction. SDA's also deny a literal burning Hell, which appeals to a lot of unsaved people who are intimidated by truth-preaching churches. In a creepy way, Seventh-Day Adventists are almost synonymous with Bob Jones University today and their shallow graduates who priority music programs over Bible-preaching and truth. I've never seen such horrible pastors as I have in the Pensacola Christian College and Bob Jones University camp!

It is interesting that both myself and Pastor Steven Anderson felt compelled to comment about the religious killings in Sri Lanka. I started to write my article yesterday and found Pastor Anderson's video today. I agree fully with Brother Anderson's analysis of the matter. I am leery that the media is paying so much attention to the violence in Sri Lanka. And now I find out that Hillary is also weighing in on it, exploiting the situation for her own benefit. Catholics are NOT Christians! I am saddened any time I hear about people suffering and dying, but I am not “praying for the Christians in Sri Lanka.” I don't let the ungodly newsmedia tell me what to pray about! I pray for the people in my daily life, that I see, and know are for real, and not a media scam, like so much of what we are told nowadays. You just don't know what is or isn't true with the lying media. They lie so much that they're like the foolish boy who cried “wolf” to tease the village. So when the wolf really came, no one believed him, and the wolf ate him! I stopped believing the media long ago, and ultimately they will reap the eternal damnable rewards of their lying and ungodliness!

Jeff Rosenthal #fundie theguardian.com

Welcome to Powder Mountain – a utopian club for the millennial elite

When these young entrepreneurs bought a remote ski resort in Utah, they dreamed of an exclusive, socially conscious community. Is this the future, or Mt Olympus for Generation Me?

by Paul Lewis

Jeff Rosenthal is standing near the top of his snow-covered mountain wearing a fluffy jacket, fingerless gloves and ripped jeans. “It’s surreal, man!” he says, shivering as he surveys the landscape of newly laid roads and half-built homes. “That’s Ken Howery’s house, the co-founder of PayPal. Awesome house!”

He lists the other investors who are turning this remote Utah community into a crucible of “generational ideology, innovation and entrepreneurship”. Richard Branson will have a house here, and so will the world’s most powerful marketing executive, Martin Sorrell. The Hollywood producer Stacey Sher and the actor Sophia Bush will be their neighbours, as will Miguel McKelvey, a co-founder of WeWork, and the renowned technology investor and author of The 4-Hour Work Week, Tim Ferriss.

The audacious real estate project – branded Powder Mountain – is becoming a mecca for altruistically minded members of the global elite. “The goal will always remain the same,” says Elliott Bisnow, Rosenthal’s business partner: “To be a beacon of inspiration and a light in the world.”

Bisnow, Rosenthal and three friends, all entrepreneurs in their 30s, dreamed up the scheme after spending years running Summit, an exclusive gathering described by insiders as a “Davos for millennials”.

Applicants to Summit are screened and interviewed to ensure they display the correct “psychographic” (or mindset) for the events. It is pitched as an entertaining ideas festival, comparable to TED and Burning Man, featuring speakers such as Quentin Tarantino, Jane Fonda, Peter Thiel and Jeff Bezos. Guests pay $3,000-$8,000 (£2,200-£5,800) for access to three-day flagship events, hosted everywhere from beaches in Tulum, Mexico, to cruise ships in the Caribbean.

Having finessed the art of persuading rich people to pay to join these getaways, the founders convinced their friends to help them buy an entire mountain in Utah, complete with 10,000 acres of some of the best ski terrain in the US.

They bristle at the idea that they’re trying to build a high-altitude utopia for plutocrats, but then casually refer to a segment of their clientele as “the billionaire set” – and don’t hesitate to mention that their mountain happens to be located between towns named Eden and Paradise.

The beautiful surroundings and unique blend of people, Rosenthal believes, will create the “exponential opportunities of the future”. “I have this whole rap with Gertrude Stein, Katharine Graham, De’ Medici, Bauhaus. There’s this rich history of groups coming together, where the whole is more than the sum of the parts, right?” he says. “I think that’s what’s happening here.”

Such hype might seem detached from reality, but it is much in vogue among the technology sector’s new generation of millionaires and billionaires, who seem keen to distance themselves from the selfish excess of their predecessors from 1980s Wall Street. They show less interest in super-yachts or sports cars; instead they speak about spiritual enrichment, connections to nature and purpose. It is against this backdrop that countless Summit-like festivals, retreats and communities have emerged in and around California, promising to help wealthy clients find a better version of themselves.

Further Future, a gathering in the Nevada desert attended by the ex-Google CEO Eric Schmidt, which has been described as “Burning Man for the 1%”, promises a culture of “mindful optimism, wonder and exploration”. Scott Kriens, the chairman of the technology multinational Juniper Networks, recently opened a retreat for self-improvement and introspection in a redwood forest near Santa Cruz, California, recognising that, despite its great advances, the internet “did not help people connect to themselves”. And Esalen, an institute perched on a cliff in Big Sur that has been a magnet for a bohemian set searching for spiritual enlightenment for half a century, is now directly courting guilt-laden tech executives. “The CEOs, inside they’re hurting,” the director, Ben Tauber (a former Google product manager), recently said of his clients. “They wonder if they’re doing the right thing for humanity. These are questions we can only answer behind closed doors.”

Summit prides itself on its progressive “content”, with talks about global warming, inequality, racial divisions and the war in Syria, but there is a celebrity draw, with talks such as “Jessica Alba on defying expectations” and “Andre Agassi on scaling change”.

During the February weekend I attend (a smaller retreat on the mountain, which costs around $2,000), there are only three talks, each lasting an hour; the remaining three days are spent skiing, snowshoeing, eating and drinking, relaxing in yoga or spa sessions, or partying in crowded hot tubs.

For all its intellectual bravado, a big appeal of Summit has always been recreational. Food is provided by Michelin-starred chefs, and top musicians are flown in for dance parties; the Summit crowd contains a dedicated contingent of Burning Man aficionados, known as “Burners”, who are adept at adding fuel to the festivities. (Rick Glassman, a comedian flown from LA for a 10-minute set, prompts howls of laughter when he says Summit had taught him that “everyone does mushrooms”.)

[snip]

The story of how Bisnow and his friends – Rosenthal, Ryan Begelman, Jeremy Schwartz and Brett Leve – came to occupy their bubble on a mountaintop in Utah has become something of a legend. It began in 2008, when Bisnow, with the boundless confidence of a 23-year-old businessman, cold-called entrepreneurs he admired and invited them on an all-expenses-paid trip to Utah. Bisnow shouldered the cost of the 19-strong gathering on his credit card, then repeated the trick with another get-together in Mexico, racking up $75,000 in debt. Bisnow and the others quickly coalesced a sort of “mutual aid society” for young, well-connected businessmen, which in the early days included the co-founders of Twitter and Facebook and the real-estate heiress Ivanka Trump.

Soon, Bisnow and his friends were running dozens of closed-door events dedicated to creating “positive impact” – and hosting their flagship conferences on cruise voyages that sailed from Miami to the Bahamas. Those events acquired a reputation as booze cruises for white, male tech bros, so a few years ago Summit decided it was time for a rebrand. They introduced cheaper tickets for women to improve the gender ratio, and abandoned the Caribbean for a more down-to-earth location: Los Angeles. “Not Santa Barbara. Not Beverly Hills,” Rosenthal says. “But downtown LA – where you’re literally in the throes of gentrification and homelessness.”

For years the team worked remotely in Amsterdam, Tel Aviv, New York, Miami and Barcelona. They would combine work with snowboarding in Montana and surfing in Nicaragua. But by late 2011, the friends were approaching 30 and starting to travel less. They were living and working out of a mansion in Malibu and, Rosenthal recalls, hosting “amazing dinners that became pretty culturally significant in LA at that time”.

t was around this time they heard from a Utah-based venture capitalist that Powder Mountain was for sale and hatched a plan to transform their considerable social capital into real estate.

The plan was enacted months later, after a gathering they hosted in Lake Tahoe. They chartered a Boeing 737 and flew about 75 of their wealthier patrons from northern California to a tiny airport in Utah’s Ogden Valley. From there, it was just a short drive to the top of Powder Mountain. They arrived in time for sunset, lit a bonfire in the snow and laid out their vision.

Each investor who helped them buy the mountain would receive a plot of land – and, assuming the plan worked, their money back at a future date. They bought the mountain for $40m in 2013, but it is only in recent months that the wooden shells of the first 26 properties have mushroomed out of the mountainside, along with roads, bridges and ski lifts.

Much to the frustration of some locals, machines have been drilling wells deep into the mountain in search of water. One day there will be 500 homes on the mountain, and a village with coffee shops, juice bars, restaurants, a sound studio and a five-star hotel.

Rosenthal takes me on a driving tour of the mountain, to explain how they plan to create a community that is different from exclusive resorts such as Aspen, Colorado. Restrictions prevent anyone from building a home larger than 4,500 sq ft, and residents must use vetted architects to ensure that their home is “subservient to the land” and in a style that has been called “heritage modernism”.

“None of the architecture should express taste or wealth,” Rosenthal says, nodding to the spot that will become a central promenade. “That is a very walkable main street – we will have soft Italian kerbs.”

I steer the conversation to the subject of how utterly detached from the real world elites seem to have become. “Elitism, the way I would define it, is obtainable,” he replies. “All that stands between you and being elite is your own investment in yourself.”

I tell Rosenthal that I’ve met many people in America who work as hard as him and his friends – harder, in fact – but struggle to make ends meet. He acknowledges that he’s benefited from considerable advantage, but insists we now live in an era in which “the internet is the great equaliser”.

“What are you doing to create the utility for yourself? Are you introducing people so they can collaborate?” he says. Struggling Americans, he adds, might want to “host a dinner. Invite 10 strangers. See what happens.”

Tuthmosis Sonofra #fundie #sexist returnofkings.com

7 Traits of the Male Feminist


Tuthmosis Sonofra
Tuthmosis is a Columnist-at-Large at Return of Kings. His work has been covered by major media outlets such as The Huffington Post, Cosmopolitan, Vice Magazine, The Daily Mail, and Yahoo Shine. He's also been profiled by BuzzFeed and The New Statesman. You can follow him on Twitter.

The only reason radical feminism has managed to achieve such an influential and mainstream position in Western society is through the vital reinforcements provided by turn-coat gender traitors who willfully cannibalize other men to please their female overlords. This is the male feminist. These are men whose entire personas are predicated on keeping others from offending their female bosses. They shame natural male behavior and spread the intellectualized delusion that are today’s feminist talking-points. They publicly self-castrate, lying to themselves and others about their own sexual impulses and imperatives.

The great irony—and secret—is that they have the same ends as guys who learn game: to get the women into the sack (loath as they may be to admit it), except they do it by trying to curry their favor through obsequious groveling.


1. Lispy, effete voice.
There’s good science that shows that today’s men are being exposed to greater quantities of female hormones. Among the causes is a contaminated water supply with trace amounts of birth-control compounds from women’s urine. The mass consumption of soy products—a natural source of estrogen—is another likely culprit. Whatever the origins, there is an epidemic of ostensibly heterosexual men with “gay voice,” none more clearly than the male feminist, who deliberately takes the bass and manly tone out of his voice so as to not offend.

2. Condescending, snarky girl-tone and eye-rolling.
Added to the character of his voice is a patronizing, dismissive tone (often with “upspeak” and vocal fry) common with obnoxious teenage girls and a certain cross-section of (actual) gay men. Rather than disagree with an argument on its merits, they sigh through it like Al Gore at a presidential debate. To make matters worse, he artificially laces his speech with profanity, which rather than toughness, comes off like a moody girl cussing at her boyfriend.

3. Slovenly appearance, featuring a vegan-style beard.
The uniform of the male feminist is a non-threatening cocktail of emasculating hipster-wear, with an unkempt beard—the badge of today’s weak guy—and anything else that makes it patently obvious he never hits the gym and poses no danger whatsoever to anything.

4. Parrots word salad of incoherent feminist talking points.
The male feminist repeats all of the made-up jargon of the hysterical feminist (science fiction-sounding utterances like “cis-gender” and “sex-positive”). They also participate in the misappropriation and abuse of once-sound, useful English-language words like “consent,” “patriarchy,” and “privilege.”

5. Rape alarmist.
Like any lock-step feminist, the male feminist drops the Rape Card several times in any discussion, irrespective of subject. Like the word “smurf” in the 80s cartoon, the word “rape” is slowly being eroded of meaning by its catch-all use for anything and everything. The goal of this repeated invocation is to further whip up an exaggerated hysteria around rape, make everyone believe there’s a rapist on every corner, and make it sound like everyone’s whispering “rape jokes” when women aren’t looking. I can count on one hand how many rape jokes I’ve heard in my entire life, and still have enough fingers left over to stimulate the clitoris of a pixie cut-wearing, female-bodied individual.

6. Enabling feminist hysteria by providing excuses for bigoted behavior and by demanding that others also walk on egg shells.

According to this guy—and all feminists—it’s okay to be permanently scared of men if you’ve ever been victimized by them, however real or imagined that victimization may have been. By this rationale, I can permanently remain “apprehensive” and “have fear” of black people “as a category” because I was once robbed, at gun point, by a black guy. Furthermore, he excuses feminist hate-speech as simple “making-fun-of-you” not to be taken seriously, while simultaneously labeling anything said by the opposing side as 100-percent-serious hate-speech.

7. False veneer of intellectualism and academic grounding.
To lend some kind of legitimacy to his specious, problematic logic, he cites oblique academic-sounding references in a poorly constructed straw-man argument about what “men’s rights advocates” use to prove the existence of misandry. He engages in the typically feminist mental acrobatics that—when it’s all said and done—have turned night into day, made up into down, and rendered men into women.

Like any outsider-turned-convert to a religion, the male feminist is always more radical—and dangerous—to the non-believer. If, like many men, you have the misfortune to have to be around them, tread carefully. Always looking to prove his loyalty, the male feminist will do everything in his power to cut down a confident, masculine man—fabricating stories, running to the authorities, and anything else to throw you under bus—all to (hopefully) score a few points with his female overlords.

CertifiedRabbi #fundie reddit.com

I just plea for the people that do show up to present the movement well, although I know that that's probably not realistic since the people that are crazy enough to engage in pro-White activism in the real world tend to have "eccentric" personalities. Just please do your best to not spout extremist rhetoric or display extremist symbols. And please, please, please be non-violent.
And for the people that will denounce me for being a beta optics cuck; of the two scenarios listed below, which do you think will best help our movement to grow?
Strategy A, the "don't cuck one single fucking inch" strategy: call out the Jew as much as possible while carrying torches; don't reject our traditional symbols like the Confederate flag, neo-Nazi symbols, and KKK uniforms; don't be afraid to give Nazi salutes because it strikes fear into our enemies and helps to "trim the fat"; beat the fuck out of anyone who dares to attack you first in order to prove to the world that we're alpha Chads; don't forget to bring guns and tactical gear because it's technically legal under the 2nd Amendment; and make sure to bring shields, helmets, and batons because we're almost certainly going to get physically assaulted by leftists.
Strategy B, aka strategic optics cucking: show up wearing a suit or at least normal clothing; carry innocuous yet subversive signs that read "It's Okay To Be White"; use Jared Taylor as the model for how to respond to extremely politically incorrect questions about race; respond with love and kindness towards our enemies rather than hate and anger; and never fight back when attacked and do your best to act like pacifist monks.
When I was writing comments on this subreddit in the immediate aftermath of the first Unite the Right rally advocating for strategy B, people were angrily denouncing me and accusing me of intentionally trying to get people on our side hurt. And I guess that it's actually true that I care more about what's best for the movement than I do about the health and safety of our supporters that are engaging in real world activism. And this is an issue where Richard and I strongly disagree.
Richard seems to be genuinely concerned about getting punched again, whereas that mindset makes absolutely zero sense to me because I'm simply not afraid of being physically assaulted. And it seems like there's something like a 50/50 split among people in general who are actually genuinely terrified of the prospect of being physically assaulted (even if they know that it probably won't be fatal), while the other half couldn't really care less and even enjoys fighting. And then there's another split in the movement between the people like me that are much more afraid of getting their life ruined through a doxx, whereas people like Richard give absolutely zero fucks when it comes to that type of thing.
So, I don't want to give Richard and other people in the movement too much shit by calling them pussies if they're unwilling to martyr their bodies by absorbing some blows from Antifa and other anti-White, communist degenerates without fighting back - because obviously I'm the bigger bitch here for being scared of being doxxed.
But regardless of who's a bitch or not, my advice in favor of pacifism and optics cucking is simply right. By not fighting back, even when you're justified in doing so, you deny Antifa and the larger left's strategy of baiting you into committing crimes and looking like violent thugs.
I used to be a radical leftist activist that was borderline Antifa, so I know how they operate. They intentionally try to provoke the police, or in this case Alt-Right activists, into attacking them because then they'll have tons of great footage of the police/Alt-Right activists acting like violent savages - which they can then convert into propaganda footage for their cause. They can also wage lawfare against you in order to throw you in jail, turn you into an informant, sue the fuck out of you, and ultimately discredit you in the minds of the masses by making you look like dangerously violent neo-Nazi Klansmen.
You're going to be completely surrounded by dozens of hostile leftist journalists who absolutely despise you and who secretly sympathize with the leftists that are trying to violently shut down your speech. They're going to edit their footage to make you look like monsters regardless of what you say or do. But you can't use that as an excuse to go full 14/88. You always have to keep your composure and maintain the moral high ground.
And try to think about it this way: We all know that Antifa and other anti-White communists are going to show up in droves, right? Welp, stop thinking about them as your mortal enemy and start viewing them as your greatest asset. They're autistic enough to proudly display communist symbols and physically assault you, and that's ultimately a good thing for our movement. Bait them into attacking you so that you can send them to jail, sue the fuck out of them, and discredit the entire leftist establishment that backs them and the underlying "anti-racist" leftist ideology that they represent. And by baiting them, I don't mean lunging at them or cussing them out or whatever. Simply showing up with an "It's Okay To Be White" sign or a red MAGA hat and an American flag will be enough to provoke them into violently attacking you. Take the beating, try to look as vulnerable as possible, and don't fight back.
Congratulations! You've successfully figured out a strategy to turn the left's violence and extremism into the greatest PR asset for our movement. They're the ones that will come away from that rally looking like evil, communist, anti-White monsters. And you and the larger pro-White/Alt-Right community will come away looking like the victims that were being violently persecuted simply because you're mildly pro-White and were trying to exercise your free speech rights. That will red-pill so many fucking people. And you only have to suffer some cuts and bruises that will eventually heal. And that's a pretty small price to pay if you really do care about saving your people from the anti-White left and (((You-Know-Who))).
I know that your natural instincts are to fight back and to defend yourself because nobody wants to look like a weak little bitch while getting laughed at and taunted by an angry mob, but that's honestly what you have to do if you want to strategically outmaneuver our enemies. The Western world has been completely cucked; they don't like bullies. This whole mindset of trying to out-alpha Antifa and control the streets by force is so meatheaded and counterproductive at our current level of growth and popularity. You guys tried that strategy at the first rally, and it backfired horribly. The sane response to the absolutely massive PR disaster that was the first Unite the Right rally isn't to double down, as most people in the movement are (stupidly) advocating for. Give my strategy a chance.
And oh, yeah - police your ranks too. The left - heck, maybe even the government - will almost certainly send infiltrators into the movement that are intentionally going to try to make us look bad and produce legal evidence and propaganda footage to use against us. We already know that they did that at the last rally. All they have to do is send in a few people carrying extremist symbols like Nazi flags and give Nazi salutes to the press in order to give the press the "gotcha" footage that they want. Even if those people are genuine, you still need to try to gently remove them from the rally and go out of your way to clearly denounce them. And I don't care if people will get mad at me for saying that. You have to have a zero tolerance policy towards that type of bad optics if you want the movement to go mainstream and actually make a difference.
This is our chance to rehabilitate the movement and put the wind back into our sails. Don't fuck it up.

EL KABONG #fundie forum.myspace.com

How is relating feminism to a death cult whining? I'm merely pointing out an obvious similarity or possibly a factual observation.

Feminism has made abortion rights the cornerstone of their foundation. Abortion is DEATH, being either the death of a human child or a tissue mass that, left to live, would turn into a human child. regardless, something dies.

Death cults celebrate death and use death as the cornerstone of their fundamental dogma.

Blood is the sacremental element and death is the goal.

John Doe #fundie wehuntedthemammoth.com

Adams is so great. Fuck all you dirty piece of shit feminists you should be FUCKING SHOT or sterilized. or sent to a rehabilitation facility.
You should lose your right to vote. Ignorance is dangeorus. and Feminism is evil ignorance. Feminism is not about equal rights and has not been for many decades. Maybe if this was the 1960s america you could say something to me, but now you can shove it up your fucking ass. Fuck american womena nd fuck feminism.
Men will stop getting marreid more and more. THe spawn of the MGTOW groups are evidence of this.
The government is getting what they want. People to stop breeding.
I think every feminist should be sent to a labor camp or imprisoned or shot dead. I don’t care. You are scum and if you are not capable of changing you should lose your right to live. All humans are a burden to the earth, but Feminists are a burden to all humans and everything else, especially men.
Women are treated like children and coddled with kid gloves and in some ways you always have been.
Even in 1890 there was a female bandit in the west that did crazy shit and got away with it for years. But there were men that did the same that were shot dead instantly.
And men have always fought the wars. Women rarely in any society ever had to do so. You got to stay home. You got the easier job.
The only way now for a normal guy to have a healthy relationship with a girl under 30 in the new generation is to scare the shit out of your woman and make her fear you and make her think you will end her life if she tries to screw you over. That is the only way to keep them in line from being destructive bitches. And even then you might have to sit them down and threaten them now and then.
I had to, i’ve had to with the last girl i dated. all the time.
Look what happened when i didn’t. She told her friend i was a drug dealer simply because she was jealous she liked me. She publically slandered me. So i used her took her virginity which honestly id trade for her hotter friend at this point.
Unless you are rich and powerful and good looking youre only real option to have a good time and enough control that you can relax is to scare the shit out of these girls, find some way to blackmail them or scare them and use it. That is the only way.
Even without me saying any of this it remains true and feminism has destroyed the country and everyone born from the 90s onward.
David Futrelle is a piece of shit beta male and should lose his right to vote among other freedoms for supporting such a piece of shit ideology.
The US and Canada and most 1st world countries are female dominated all the way up to the super rich who then are the men having power but everyone who is not rich is ruled and controlled by females if they want any kind of success. Period.
Unless you do as I was saying before, find a way to scare a girl and blackmail her into doing what you want. Because even if she likes you, even if you are perfect for her, she would rather run away and flirt with many other guys and fuck things up. So scare her into submission.

RabidLibertarian #fundie reddit.com

First of all, who gives a shit what groups he belong to? He was a nutcase. And the left tells us again and again that we shouldn't judge groups by the actions of their most radical members. The only response to them should be to point out their hypocrisy.

Second, this does fit a crazy theory I have about jews. I don't think there is a grand jewish conspiracy or anything like that. For one thing it's already well established jews are severely inbred and have a much higher rates of mental illness. Which this shooter clearly had.

But also I think they have a personality type that makes them much more likely to join radical political movements. Look how many of the notable communists were jewish. Today communism is basically dead so they are way overrepresented in stuff like feminism (I had a similar image to that one for feminists but I can't find it.) I have a study that shows jews have maybe up to a standard deviation or more higher "openness" than non jews. Which is a personality trait no one really understands, but correlates with political views very well. And is highly heritable.

Centuries ago, Europeans that had similar personality types probably joined religion and became celibate monks and priests. And bred those traits out of the white population. Whereas jewish rabbis had large families.

KidknappedHerRaptor #sexist archive.ph

Re: I sympathize with incels

I’m 6’8” good looking and strong, I played college basketball and have had a variety of experiences dating attractive women, the problem is that women are extremely low quality in character and can have extreme flaws that we are expected to compromise for because they are attractive and automatically have sky high value without earning it, which entitles and enables women to not have to improve themselves because they can take advantage of whoever they want and so many men will put up with it.
I agree with incels. Feminism makes no sense, women hold the power. I’m considered a top quality male and even I am struggling with shit always having to compromise where I shouldn’t. I can’t find a girl that suits me without severely dating down in one aspect or another. Great sex, attractive but crazy. Nice, attractive but no sex drive and a lazy life sucking burden. Great personality and work ethic but not that attractive, maybe a once in a blue moon sex kind of attractiveness not a sustainable daily sex kind of attraction. I mean, I’m a high quality male and I can’t win either, and other high quality males are the same because women that would be on our level are unattainable, they’re valued so much more and almost all women are entitled to be above criticism or bettering themselves, you have to get lucky. A woman will likely never admit fault and you will have to compensate in some unsustainable way that will make you miserable.
Society is heavily sexist against men. Men are increasingly becoming depressed, committing suicide, turning gay, mentally ill, or transgender etc. abusing drugs.
Men account for the majority of the work force, a majority or suicides and war casualties, a majority of loneliness and depression.
Meanwhile standards for men are extreme. Generally over 6ft, make good money, attractive good shape, personality, and willing to put up with a woman’s bullshit and compensate for her shit because he has no choice in the dating market and hope he can live with it and it’s a bearable amount, but if the man has any flaw he’s gone.
Women have the advantage of higher peak sexual marketplace value, advantage in court sexual harassment, rape accusations, child custody, domestic abuse. Women get away with all these things but if a man is even accused of one of these his life is ruined.
As things get safer and manual labor and protection becomes less important, the value of our strength and protection is also devalued.
Men are not valued. We’re taken for granted and we’re the reason for almost everything productive.
I’m a top 20% male easily and cannot find a woman in my generation that can support or value me in the ways I need and I’m very flexible. I met a woman that was great, but the problem was she was much older. I’m 25 and she was 40. And didn’t want age gap to be a problem later on, but it also says a huge amount about how spoiled, brain dead, and cunty, sluts women of our generation are on general. There’s always exceptions of course and I respect women, but I’ve been abused by a lot of women and they get away with it. Domestic abuse, sexual harassment, emotion abuse, manipulation, etc. you name it. Most women are too high risk and scary. I’m about to call up this 40 year old if things don’t change soon... I hope she froze some eggs. Fuck my generation. You’re all cunts.

Minori #fundie rr-bb.com

(on eHarmony getting sued to offer same-sex matches)

This is an outrage! How completely ridiculous is this?? I used to be pretty cool with the gay rights movement, but now I just can't see it that way! These people are going crazy. They've been nothing short of horrible to Christians!!

I'm aware that not everyone in the gay community is like that, but what I've seen just this past week has been shocking and disturbing! I'm getting really sick of these shenanigans!

enemyofislam #sexist reddit.com

Are incels the modern day jews?

think about it
* we are blamed for the problems of society
* openly attacked and discriminated against
* subjected and casted out from society (i.e the explosion of jews from europe to the banning of /r/incels on reddit)
* emotionally abused and berated by the majority of the worlds population (i.e females) just for being who we are
* forced by genetics to wear metaphorical stars of david identifying ourselves as incels (i.e being under 6 ft and having non-distinct jaw lines)
* people fantasize about killing us (check out anti incel subreddits)
Worst of all unlike the jews we actually didnt do anything to instigate this abuse against us
The only question now is how long we will put up with this? Will we let the attacks against us keep getting more and more severe until we are dying by the millions or start learning to fight back?

narcissist #fundie incels.co

IncelTears is a hate group. Worse than the KKK.

Incel tears is a hate group designed to bully and harass depressed and suicidal people. On Reddit they make fun and tease incels, but they actually think they're making the world a better place because of it. If you consider all the incels who have killed themselves I think it would be fair to say inceltears are partly responsible.

I ask you all, what's more pathetic? A virgin male looking for a community who he can relate with and they can actually respect him for who he is. Or a hate group that bullies virgins online every single day whilst Tyrone is banging their wives.

Various Incels #sexist #racist incels.co

RE: [LifeFuel] White roastie forced to eat outside in China

(andinocel)

http://www.sixthtone.com/news/1005386/foreigners-collateral-damage-as-china-curbs-imported-infections

image

Zinta, a Latvian national, eats a meal outside a restaurant while her Chinese husband and daughter dine indoors, Chengdu, Sichuan province, 2020. Courtesy of Zinta

“My husband was passing the food through the window to me,” she said.

Based, even though I'm not Chinese and would be subject to this treatment, but I don't live in China. Other non-white countries treat whites like gods
Western normies just can't deal because they've never experienced it before. The Chinese have long memories, and behind the guise of the Covid-19 control, behind this, I'm sure many Chinese are thinking "this is how whites treated Chinese and other non-whites in the past", while the normie screams "but I wasn't there!"; yet, the Chinese don't care. Again, they have long memories, and in their collectivist, long-term outlook on life, you are as guilty as your ancestors. I'm just stating how things, are, I'm not a China apologist, and would not want to live there (I'm too lazy and scatterbrained to work 12 hour days)

Chinks don't give a fuck about other non-Whites.

I know. But the Chinks still have what they call the Century of Humiliation. To normie westerners, it's history. To the Chinks, it's yesterday

(Higgscel)

Anybody dumb enough to choose to live in china, let alone mix breed with the bugs are low IQ and deserve what they get.

(Reprobus)

And the bitch complains so hard she ends up on the news where all the sjws can criticize them for treating a privileged Stacy like shit jfl

(Linesnap99)

Piss on that bowl..I think she will love that if it was a Chad..

(HidekiTojota)

They also have these types of restaurants in Japan jfl, they're tired of being mogged.

(RREEEEEEEEE)

Normally ethnic countries worship white people. Glad to see China isn't cucked.

(Blackpill Rage)

I know. But the Chinks still have what they call the Century of Humiliation. To normie westerners, it's history. To the Chinks, it's yesterday

That's because every non-white has a chip on their shoulders.

This, china is a shit hole. You can be killed by anything, thanks to bugman construction and safety practices. I would not go to china for business or vacation because I know how disgusting those bugmen are.

How dare you dis the country that gave us Coronachan!

(InMyCellInHell)

Serves her right for trying to join that robotic insect colony of a country.

PolishMisanthrope #crackpot #psycho incels.co

[Blackpill] 95% of men are incels

I can and I will argue that 95% of men are incels. Normies don't exist - they are just a specific breed of ours.

Ascension and this 'as an incel I only want 1 girl that will give me affection etc' thing is a cope. Getting to normie tier isn't ascension - ascension is becoming Chad.

To be honest, I can even argue that incels have it better than normies. We don't have the unpleasure of dealing with women. I personally and most of us here on these threads have heard countless stories about crazy shit thay lower-tier men go through: Getting cucked, raising children not theirs, being mentally abused by a foid.

Only top Chad will ever have happiness. Chad can feel safe and good, since every day he comes back from his snazzy halo effect work where he fucked 20 of his secretaries he will be met by a loving stacy that he is sure she won't cheat on him. Because only Chad can be sure.

Chad won. 95% lost. It's over, if even it ever began.

Both incels and normies will share the same, defensive mindset for all their lives. We will be essentially the same insecure losers we are, thanks to the virtue of being born in the lower classes. We all will be incels at heart along with normies, never truly securing a foid's affection that's reserved for Chad.

The only solution is to overthrow and exterminate the global Chad. Else, it'll be over for all men. Because I don't consider Chads men anymore. They're subhuman. They have degraded to lower levels of existence thanks to the stream of validation and now just like foids work like machines to fuck and breed with them. Still, they're happy. Still, they've won

We must put an end to this.

OK_Dokie #racist niggermania.net

I smoke. I went outside to the smoke area on break. There was another white female there and there was only the 2 of us. We are smoking our cigs as fast as we can to get back to work and some crazy, female, nigger walks up to us.

The nigger has some sort of temp cast on her leg and is on crutches. Now, you got to understand, I work downtown in a big city and there are restaurants everywhere...StarBucks, fast food, bars, all sorts of things.

The nigger then proceeds to scream at me (why me?) that she is looking for a bafroom. She then screams she has diabetes and has to go right now. RIGHT NOW. Nigger says RIGHT NOW several times. As a niggermanic, the thought ran though my mind she just might squat there like an animal. She points at the restaurant next to where me and the other white female were smoking, and asks about this restaurant bathroom. Hell, I don't know. I don't eat out. I am too busy paying taxes to support her lifestyle. I tell the beast I do not know.

Nigger walks away screaming about crazy shit. Once the sheeboon was gone, I look at the younger white lady that was there smoking with me and said WTF? She says, yeah, why would I know? We laugh a bit about the stupidity of niggers.

Always gibs, always. Crazy niggers downtown. Never changes.