Similar posts

platinumgoldstarlesbians #sexist platinumgoldstarlesbians.tumblr.com

(Just out of curiosity, why do you feel the need to differentiate between lesbians and gold star lesbians? Why does it make you so angry that women who have had sex with men have the same right as a "gold star" like you to identify as a lesbian? Is it a superiority thing? Do you think you're better than those women? I really want to know why you put so much energy into something as trivial as this. )

First of all, it is not a trivial thing. Maybe to you non gold stars but to most gold star lesbians it is not trivial. Gold Star lesbian means a lesbian who has never willingly slept with a man or boy. Where in the definition does it say that gold star lesbians think they are superior to other lesbians? Rape victims can be gold stars lesbians because it implies consensual sex not rape. The term gold star used to be a slur. “Lesbians” who had or are sleeping with men made fun of and insulted lesbians who have never and will never sleep with men willingly by saying something like this, “oh, so you have never slept with a man? So now what do you want? A gold star!?” So these lesbians eventually got sick of it and decided to reclaim the word for themselves thus the gold star lesbian. The “lesbians” and their supporters who made fun of them and future supporters who will hate the term and/or definition of the term or/and the actual gold star lesbians are forever pissed of and will do anything to silence us and make us look bad. I think it was never about the term, it was and is about the definition of the term because they are other offensive terms such as pillow princess and dyke and slut that no one is making a fuss over and even if they do people ignore it. I think these people who are antigold stars just can’t stand and comprehend how a woman has not and will not willingly have sex with men and they are pissed of because they and everyone expect every woman to sleep with a man at least once in her lifetime. I view antigold stars to be mysoginistic and homophobic. I care because it puts a really bad reputation on real lesbians. Gold star lesbians have face the same compulsory heterosexuality just like the “lesbians” who have slept with men. There is only one type of lesbian and it is a biological woman who is sexually, emotionally, romantically, and physically attracted to ONLY other biological women. By that definition lesbians don’t willingly have sex with men. Also, they are many ways to avoid having sex with men when you are faced with expectations to sleep with them unless you live in a country like Afghanistan where who are basically raped and force to do things. The only excuse that I hear of why a “lesbian” slept with a man willingly is because compulsorary heterosexuality but there excuse is not valid because gold star lesbians face the same challenges as they do. Actually they have more of a challenge and are at more of a risk because they have never and will never sleep with men willingly and society expects women to have sex with men. Gold Star lesbians are not “lucky” they are just following their lesbianism. These “lesbians” who have slept and/or are sleeping with men make lesbians a huge joke to the mayority, the straight people. Those “lesbians” reinforce the stereotype that lesbians can have sex with men willingly, it is just a phase, they will end up with men, they can be “turn”, etc. The word lesbian has been changed (not by the dictionary but by what people connote it to) to mean a woman who had sex with men but now has sex with women. I don’t even like to call myself lesbian because people especially the LGBTQ will assume that I have slept with men which is not true. So I call myself gold star lesbian and this clearly states that I have never and will never sleep with men. The term lesbian has been changed to be ambiguous meaning that it can mean anything even the bisexuals claim the word lesbians. The point is to distinguish the “lesbians” who had and/or have sex with men from the lesbians who has never and will never willingly sleep with a man. After all, who do you think a person who wants to learn about lesbians will take more seriously, a “lesbian” who has slept or/and is sleeping with men or a lesbian who has never and will never sleep with men? I care because you antigold star lesbians are silencing us and expect us to be viewed as manfuckers like every other “lesbian”. It is just a term and because antigold stars are making a huge fuss over it I assume you all are homophobic. Plus, why do the “lesbians” who have had sex with men get a voice while lesbians who never slept with men need to shut the fuck up by the antigold star lesbians? It is antigold stars who make a huge fuss about the term and put bullshit lies in our mouths such as we don’t let rape victims be gold stars (most gold stars would agree that they can be gold stars). We gold stars are just defending ourselves from your homophobic bullshit.

(Hi, so there are many issues with your argument:

1) I think it’s funny how you assumed that I am a “non gold star” lesbian just because I have a problem with your perspective. To use your language, I am in fact a “platinum gold star” lesbian. My current girlfriend was my first kiss :)

2) The term “gold star” lesbian is not a slur. The response “oh, so you have never slept with a man? So now what do you want? A gold star!?” probably came after your insufferable and needless bragging about never having been with a “biological male”, which by the way, is transphobic. I’m not surprised that you’re a terf. A sarcastic comeback is not the same as a slur. The term “dyke” is used when I’m being threatened from across the street by a group of men for holding my girlfriend’s hand. No one cares if I’m a gold star or not.

3) You assume IMMENSE amounts of privilege when talking about being a gold star lesbian. I come from a country where there was absolutely NO LGBT representation. On top of that, my family was very religious and conservative. Heterosexual sex wasn’t even discussed or represented without religious warnings and limitations, i.e. only when you’re married, etc. I have had feelings for women for as long as I could remember, but due to my young inability to comprehend what I was feeling, I continued to identify as straight. After all, I had no point of reference, so how could I identify as something I didn’t even know was an option? You don’t have to be in Afghanistan being murdered or raped to deal with compulsory heterosexuality. If I had remained in my country, I would have probably ended up in a casually arranged marriage courtesy of my parents, distant relatives, and family friends. I know for a fact that I would also have just accepted and went along with the marriage, as I would have wanted to please my family. It would have probably been a close childhood friend of mine and we could just continue to be best friends after the marriage, just with occasional sex thrown in. Would I have been enthusiastic about the sex? Maybe not, but since I would have had no point of reference, chances are that I would have just went along with it to please my husband. No big deal, right? Except that in this scenario, I’m gay and I just don’t know it.

P.S. this situation isn’t completely hypothetical, I know a few of my parents’ friends that had me lined up as an option for their sons.

What I’m trying to show you is that there is nuance to being a lesbian. Nothing is just black and white. A lesbian is a woman (cis or trans) that is attracted solely to women. Therefore, I am a lesbian, just as much as my girlfriend, @tinylesbian, who has been involved with men for means of safety and survival.

4) The differentiation of platinum/gold star lesbians vs lesbians who have been involved with men in the past creates a hierarchy and is not helpful nor conducive to a supportive lesbian community. Bragging about never having been with a “biological male” (still transphobic) should not be a point of pride as it insinuates that you are somehow more of a lesbian than women who have and honestly, it’s just unnecessary information. We don’t care. No one does.)

There are gold stars and platinum lesbians who disagree with the label and I know that but most of them that complain about the label are the ones who sleep or have slept with men. Personally, I don’t like the term because it implies something better but no one including the haters have tried to come up with a new neutral term. Transexuals can’t be lesbians because I follow science. I suppose I am a TERF but I don’t call myself that because I find it offensive. The term may not have been a slur but it obviously was used to offend the gold star lesbians. I do agree that Afghanistan is not the only place that you can get raped and murdered for being LGBTQ. Unfortunately, even the U.S. has problems with murder and rape. However, as a society you can get help if you are raped and the rapist will get punished if he or she is reported but unfortunately some countries don’t have that. I in fact am a platinum lesbian. Despite that I had tried to be straight and tried to like boys in my teenaged years but it didn’t work and never got a boyfriend or any fuckboys coming after me (probably because of my social issues). Plus, I just couldn’t bring myself to have sex with males because to me it felt like I was going to sleep with an animal. It just wasn’t for me and my extincts just said no. I also tried commiting suicide a couple of times. But just because I am a platinum lesbian doesnt means that I had an easy life and that I and other gold star and platinum lesbians should be ignored and silenced. Most of us gold star and platinum lesbians have not had an easy life and we didn’t go have sex with men to make it easier and plus it is not in our nature. I totally disagree that lesbianism is nuanced. If lesbianism is nuanced, what about straight people are they nuanced and not black and white? The lesbian community is a huge joke (at least the ones I have been to) and it is not because of gold star and platinum lesbians. It is because of “lesbians” and bisexuals who can’t shut the hell up about men whether how it was good or bad having sex with them, how to unlearn liking men, divorces, marriages, children with men, etc. I expected a community of lesbians who talked only about women and not a thing about men (relating to sexual or romantic). Plus, the hate and bullying towards and silencing of lesbians who have never slept with men by the antigold stars and antiplatinums is unbelievable. Sometimes they even ban you from the place if you have never slept with men. I don’t involve myself in the lesbian community or LGBTQ community anymore and only seek other gold star or platinum lesbians to date. You and only people with your mentality may not care about the term but why the hell do you and others think you have the right to tell us what we can and cannot call ourselves and judge us when they are many bisexuals who mislabel themselves as lesbians and make a joke out of us? One of the reasons why we are loud and vocal is because people like you want to silence us and most people don’t want to be silenced. Also, we want to be role models to young lesbians to show them that they don’t have to sleep with a men to make sure they are lesbians or to be proper lesbians. I will respect your opinions despite that I disagree with them and I hope you respect mine despite you disagreeing with me. And then we call it quits.

thegoddessisalesbiantoo #fundie thegoddessisalesbiantoo.tumblr.com

Legit every Goddess I’ve ever talked to except for one IDs as a lesbian and the one who doesn’t considered herself a lesbian until her ancient human lover’s soul got reincarnated in a male body. So yeah. Just saying.
Lilith is a lesbian. Ishtar is a lesbian. Bast is a lesbian. Aphrodite is a lesbian. The Queen of the Mountains is a lesbian. Cerridwen is a lesbian. The Dark Mother is a lesbian. The Goddess herself is a lesbian and mainstream paganism is still lesbophobic and I don’t get how.

Thomas Coy #fundie ex-gaytruth.com

The movie “For the Bible tells me so” (forthebibletellsmeso.org) was shown in my home community of Flint, Michigan in the fall of 2008 as part of a series of gay events called “Out’N About.” Although the movie was billed as a documentary, it was first and foremost a gay propaganda film.

The movie has two distinct elements to it. The documentary element examines the lives of five homosexuals and how their immediate families responded to their homosexuality. That part of the movie is actually a documentary, interesting, emotionally moving, and somewhat objective. The other part of the movie is pure gay political propaganda arranged to disparage conservative Christians and present the gay political movement as the enlightened possessors of the real truth about homosexuality.
From my observations as a scholar on the gay political movement this movie has the imprint of the gay political organization known as Soulforce (www.soulforce.org).

Soulforce has been a branch of the gay political movement specifically targeting the Bible believing Christian church. Mel White is a cofounder of Soulforce and a prominent leader in the gay political movement. A favorite target of Mel White and Soulforce has been Dr. James Dobson and his organization Focus on the Family (www.focusonthefamily.com).
The fact that the movie specifically targets Dr. James Dobson and that Dr. Mel White is a predominant spokesperson throughout the movie gives the Soulforce manipulation away. The movie at the time of this writing was featured on the Soulforce website and on the website of America’s largest gay lobbying organization – The Human Rights Campaign. A fifty page study guide comes with the movie to assist in molding the interested convert into an advocate for Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, Transgender equality with heterosexuality.
Besides the deception and lies presented as truths, the gay theology espoused in the film claiming that the Bible does not condemn homosexual behavior is considered by many a self-serving concoction. It would take a whole book to accurately address all the deception and lies in the propaganda part of the movie, so I will select instances that best support my accusations.
Scientific lies and deception
Like most gay propaganda the movie begins its justification of homosexuality by contending that homosexuality is not something that is not chosen.

Conservative Christians knowledgeable on homosexuality, including ex-gays, and psychotherapists who help people overcome unwanted same-sex attractions, agree that clinical science has shown that homosexual attractions are not usually something that an individual chooses. That there is agreement on this point is never brought up in gay propaganda and it is not acknowledged in the movie. Instead Christians, ex-gays, and therapists who disagree with the gay worldview are shown as ninnies who ignore this and other clinical facts. Knowledgeable Christians, ex-gays, and therapists do distinguish between attractions and behavior, and most certainly maintain that individuals have a choice of whether or not they engage in any form of sexual behavior. This distinction is never mentioned in gay propaganda or the movie.

Gay propaganda and clinical science diverge after the fact that homosexuals do not choose their attractions to the same sex. Using that fact as a premise gay propaganda and the movie conclude that homosexuality is an innate condition that is unchangeable and therefore equivalent to heterosexuality. The movie specifically states that “sexual orientation cannot be changed or prevented.”

There are no facts to support the innate theory, so the movie shows a cartoon series that mocks the clinical evidence on the causal factors of homosexuality and sexual orientation change. What researchers have found is that male homosexuals usually have had past experiences of prolonged rejection by the same sex parent and same sex peers throughout childhood. As a child the homosexual never felt he was a part of his gender group, and the longing to be part of the group and the mystery of the same sex turned into same-sex attractions at puberty. This is not always the causal route to male homosexuality, but it has been documented enough to be referred to as the standard causal route.

Clinical science has also documented hundreds of cases where homosexuals have changed their sexual orientation. The evidence is overwhelming. The movie claims ex-gay organizations and psychotherapists use shame and guilt to coax homosexuals to repress their true feelings, thereby presenting ex-gay organizations as a sham and destructive to the mental well being of homosexuals. Nothing could be further from the truth.

The truth is that ex-gay organizations like Exodus International (www.exodus.to) offer real hope to individuals with unwanted same-sex attractions. Many individuals have overcome homosexual behavior and desires. A significant percentage have changed their sexual orientation, married a person of the opposite sex, and raised families.
A sexual orientation change from homosexual to heterosexual is partly a reparative process and partly a cognitive process. Motivation is the main part of the cognitive process. The motivation usually comes from religious beliefs, aspirations of a heterosexual marriage, and from a fact that gay propaganda avoids like the plague, which is that many who enter the gay world find its lifestyle very destructive. The main part of the reparative process is to understand and deal with the memories and hurt of same-sex rejection in childhood. Often there was sexual abuse that contributed to the unwanted same-sex attractions. This short introduction on the causal factors of homosexuality is more accurate than the sum of all the causal information in the movie. The movie mocks this knowledge, and in doing so mocks the truth.

Theological lies and deception

A Rev. Keene makes the statement in the movie that “All loving relationships are honored in the Bible.” This is an easily refutable lie. In the same chapter of Leviticus where homosexuality is condemned there are a number of family related sexual relationships that are prohibited. Surely sexual relationships between close relatives can be loving relationships, yet contrary to Mr. Keene they are condemned. Likewise, Leviticus 18:22 reads “Do not lie with a man as one lies with a woman: that is detestable.” There is no insinuation that if a man lies with another man as one lies with a woman in a loving relationship, then it is equal to a heterosexual loving relationship.

In the New Testament the Apostle Paul was informed of a man in the Corinth church who was in a loving relationship with his stepmother. Paul told the church in Corinth to “Expel the wicked man from among you” (I Corinthians 5:13). In another incidence John the Baptist was martyred for saying that it was immoral for King Herod to marry his brother’s wife (Mark 6:18). Mr. Keene’s statement is a fabrication of what he wants the Bible to say.

Mr. Keene’s statement is also a misrepresentation of gay and liberal morality. Liberal sexual morality is based on consensual sex and is not dependent on a loving relationship or marriage. In general consensual sex without love in this moral code is as just as moral as sex in a loving relationship.
The movie presents many arguments of the new gay theology. The most amusing is “What did Jesus say about homosexuality?” The answer is “nothing,” if one ignores his comparison of the destruction of Sodom and the fate of those who did not repent after seeing miracles and hearing the gospel message (Luke 10:12). The sin of bestiality (humans having sex with animals), which happens to be listed in Leviticus 18:23 right after homosexuality, was not mentioned by Jesus in the written record of the gospels. If we use the gay logic that because Jesus did not mention homosexuality it is not immoral, then the same logic applies to bestiality, and it too is no longer immoral behavior.

When one examines Satan’s appearance in the Bible as a serpent in the Garden of Eden or tempting Jesus in the wilderness, it becomes evident that Satan’s method of persuasion is to present half truths. Likewise gay propaganda often persuades with half truths. One such instance in the movie was the gay theological argument that God’s condemnation of Sodom was not because the city was steeped in homosexual behavior, but because it was inhospitable.
The half truth that gay theology presents is that Sodom was indeed inhospitable to the two angels sent to their city in the form of handsome young men. Instead of welcoming the strangers, the men of Sodom sought to anally rape the young men. What the movie does not reveal is that in the ancient world accepted homosexual behavior was not two men of the same sex in a loving reciprocal relationship. It was a dominate man sodomizing a subordinate man or youth, usually a slave or captive from a battle. It was considered a humiliation for a man to be sodomized in any type of relationship.
In a related half truth the movie states that pederasty (an adult man sodomizing an adolescent male) is not homosexuality. It is true that pederasty is considered a specific sexual orientation in itself, but it is definitely a form of homosexuality. Intellectual elites in Ancient Greece during the time of Plato and Socrates considered arranged pederasty relationships the most preferred of all loving relationships. In the late 1980s gay authors Kirk and Madsen referred to the pederasty relationships of ancient Greece as the “traditional gay family.” The values of the Grecian society allowed the free man to not only have sexual relations with his wife, but also prostitutes, both female and male slaves, and a young free man to whom he would also be a mentor. When the young free man became an adult the pederasty relationship ended, because it was dishonorable for a man to be sodomized or have effeminate characteristics.

Deception in the storytelling

The five families featured in the movie were rated as to how supportive they were to their gay child. One family, the Reitans, was given the distinction of being “LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender) Advocates.” In the movie the family is shown taking part in a Soulforce sponsored demonstration at the Focus on the Family facility in Colorado Springs. With his parents at his side the gay child, Jake, makes the accusation that Focus on the Family teaches parents to reject their children.

Mary Lou Wallner was given the distinction of being “Very Unsupportive (Initially)” Mary Lou’s lesbian daughter, Anna, committed suicide. Mary Lou Wallner is now an advocate for gay rights and has been touring the nation in support of the movie. In one part of the movie she tells the videographer that she blames Dr. James Dobson for the suicide of her daughter. At that time in her life Mary Lou was a member of a conservative Christian church that believed homosexual behavior was sin. She also followed the advice of Dr. James Dobson and did not accept her daughter’s homosexuality. The movie portrays that lack of acceptance as the cause of Anna’s suicide.

The Poteat family was listed as “Partially Supportive.” This family kept an open relationship with their lesbian daughter. They too were conservative Christians, who did not approve of their daughter’s homosexuality, but their daughter was always welcome at her childhood home and she always knew her family loved her, even though they did not approve of her lesbian relationships.
Having been a follower of Dr. James Dobson myself and having attended their controversial “Love Won Out” conferences on homosexuality, I can attest that Focus on the Family does not teach parents to reject their children. Obviously, Jake has never personally investigated Dr. Dobson or Focus on the Family, but relied on second hand information from Soulforce to make his damning accusation.

Focus on the Family and their Love Won Out conferences teach parents to continue to openly love their children while continuing their disapproval of the child’s sexual behavior. Focus tells parents the truth that homosexual attractions are usually not a choice, that sexual orientation change is possible but not easy, and that parents need to love their children just as God loves them, even in their sin. The Poteat family is actually a good example of what Focus and Dr. Dobson teach.

Mary Lou Wallner was present at the screening of the movie I attended in Flint. In my research on homosexuality I have read reports and heard lectures by clinical psychologists that lesbians do not usually seek counseling because of conflicts with their sexual orientation, but rather for distress from broken relationships. In the Q and A following the movie I asked Mary Lou if her daughter had any recent relationship problems before the suicide. Mary Lou revealed that her daughter had recently broken up with her long-time lover and moved in with another lesbian who had three teenage children. About two and a half months into this new relationship the woman asked Mary Lou’s daughter to move out. Shortly after this breakup, the daughter committed suicide.

Mary Lou also revealed that her daughter was always welcome at her childhood home. When her daughter and lesbian partners visited, Mary Lou and her husband let them sleep in the same bed. It became clear very quickly how distorted the movie had portrayed Anna’s suicide and the conservative Christian beliefs Mary Lou once held. The Wallner’s were at least as supportive of their lesbian daughter as the Poteats were, and maybe even more so.
Anna Wallner’s suicide had little to do with her parent’s disapproval of homosexual behavior, but a lot to do with the destructive aspects of lesbian relationships. The movie intentionally distorted this fact and used this terrible tragedy to smear an innocent man and the organization he represents. But this is nothing new, it is standard gay propaganda.

Incel Wiki #sexist #wingnut incels.wiki

A NEETcel is either (1) someone who believes that their status as a NEET is a major contributor to their inceldom or (2) someone who is an incel and also is a NEET, either because they see no point to working (since they can't betabuxx), or for other reasons. Many incels are discriminated against in the workplace for their looks, so it becomes a contributing factor in why they become NEETs.

Some incelists are NEET for political reasons as they don't wish to contribute taxes to a purse which disproportionately benefits normies, Chads and Stacy's r just sex-havers in general. These incelists argue that a large proportion of single mothers who produced children from their wild hooking-up during their teens and 20s eventually become single mothers on welfare. As such, since incels weren't invited to these hooking u parties, incelists wonder why they should pay for the after-effect of a party they were excluded from. To incelists, this makes about as much sense as paying the rent of a random person you don't know, halfway across the world. Others have chosen the NEETcel path out of misanthropy, and subsequent unwillingness to engage in a society they feel has rejected them.

Tom Vivian #fundie hellogiggles.com

This anti-child bride thing is part of a radical feminist movement. Here are the facts for anyone who cares to consider them:
-- Worldwide, throughout history, people have normally been considered adults at ages as young as 12 and as old as 21. But the ones on the older end of the scale (17 to 21) are actually an anomaly -- most societies have given people only 12 to 16 years to grow up and take on the mantle of adulthood.
-- "Extended childhood" is the exclusive province of wealthy, urbanized nations, in which most people do not live off the land.
-- The people who run this campaign would have you believe that marrying young causes one to be poor. They are confusing cause and effect. Actually, it is the poor people who are most likely to marry young. This is because it provides an advantage to the family or tribal structure. Life expectancies aren't all that long anyway in many of these places, and in an agrarian society where people are living off the land, there is not the kind of opportunity to do other things as there are in Westernized, wealthy nations. But interestingly enough, if you go back even 100 years in American history, you will find many young women marrying between ages 12-18. Same was true in many European countries. People who are farming would have a different outlook on this issue than an 18-year old heading off to Columbia University. If your choices are to keep working on your family's farm and babysit your younger siblings, or start your own family, many would choose the latter option.
-- The death rate of young women from pregnancies again confuses cause and effect. In places where people marry this young, these are the same places that have much lower quality of health care and higher death rates from all causes. A 25-year old in rural India is just as likely to die in childbirth as a 16-year old in that same place.
-- Teens having babies hit an epidemic proportion in the United States about 15 years ago but is on the decline now. Many of these young women wanted a baby so much that they were willing to go to extremes. One undercover article exposed a pact between high school girls in Salem MA to get pregnant, and they found a homeless guy who would knock them up so they could get pregnant. This has happened also in the other industrialized nations that forbid "child marriage". Just how is it better for society if a young, unmarried woman has a baby than if a young woman who desires a family gets married to an older man who is willing and able to provide for one?
-- Teens who get pregnant out of wedlock in western nations are much poorer relative to their peers than those who marry young in third-world countries. In those places where this is going on, pretty much everybody is poor (at least by Western standards).
Here is a final question that is food for thought?
Why are these people trying to solve the social problems of cultures half a world away while they refuse to look at pressing issues right in their own cultures?

Corey Savage #sexist returnofkings.com

8 Factors That Are Destroying Healthy Relationships Between Men And Women

Corey is an iconoclast and the author of 'Man's Fight for Existence'. He believes that the key to life is for men to honour their primal nature. Visit his new website at primalexistence.com

Most men, even if they’re still swimming in ocean of blue pills, have some awareness that something has gone awry with the relationship between men and women. Statistics prove this as well as divorce has been epidemic for a while now with record-number of children growing up with single parent around the world while young people are having less sex than before. And whether you be a feminist or part of the manosphere, I think both sides can agree on one thing: that a war between the sexes have been heating up in the recent years.

Why is all this happening? While men and women tend to play the blame game to avoid taking any responsibility, there are greater forces at play. The fact is, the continuing transformation of our society is making the antagonism between the sexes inevitable. Feminism is just a symptom, not the cause of our problems.

Before we look at why today’s sex relations are in a dismal state, consider the single factor that makes relationships prosper: Mutuality based on different but compatible roles.

All relationships work best when two parties have something different to share for their mutual benefit. For example, humans and horses have enjoyed a close relationship together throughout history (unlike, say, humans and bears). The relationship works because in exchange for food, protection, and care that humans provide, the horses offer themselves as transportation.

The relationship between men and women was also mutually beneficial for the entirety of human existence with men offering their services in exchange for having the women bear their children. But now, with the advent of modern society and its conditions, things have changed drastically.

1. “Equality”
image
At least these men had their male privilege.

“Equality” for women is the most abominable lie to have ever perpetuated on mankind.

Men have always provided for women. Men hunted for food, labored to build everything, and fought battles to defend their tribe. To say that men oppressed women throughout history is an insult to all those who sacrificed themselves in the factories, the coal mines, and the trenches. If women didn’t have certain rights that feminists like to cherry-pick, it’s because women weren’t drafted to fight wars. In exchange for their toil, the only thing men asked of women was to be supportive in their roles as wives and mothers.

But fast-forward to today, now that women have “achieved” social and political “equality” and even various advantages just for being born a female, many women today no longer feel that it’s necessary to exchange values with men for mutuality. It’s like when humans developed automobiles and didn’t need horses anymore. The difference is, humans and horses don’t need to be together; men and women do.

However, men’s sexual desire—which is greater than that of females—is still alive and kicking. So what we have today is a situation where women have gotten their social equality while sexual inequality persists for men (which is why many men choose to give up sex entirely to level the playing field). This is what happens when you standardize human beings into economic units.

2. Education and career over family

Stressed out from balancing between work and family? Yup, it’s the men’s fault that you tried to do both.

To maintain their advantage over men, women today are dedicating themselves to their education and career. Western women, in particular, have been so thoroughly sold on the idea of status and consumerist orgy that they are no longer interested in relationships. More and more women today are delaying marriage (if not outright rejecting it). And when they do get married, they are using it as a means to trap men into donating their sperm and cash, only to bail out when they want to.

3. Slut culture
image
Wow, what an achievement! I’m sure your failed parents are just as proud.

The advent of contraception and the decimation of whatever feminine decency that was left has turned the vast majority of young Western women into drunken sluts. The increasing number of sluts is diminishing the availability of quality women that men want to start a family with and has social implications for the society as a whole.

4. Government supplanting men
image

The only way women were able to “liberate” themselves from their supposed oppressors was by latching themselves on to a new alpha provider: the government. As said before, men form relationships with women by exchanging values, with his strength to provide and protect being his greatest asset. But now, the government (along with corporations and education system) fulfills those roles that men previously occupied. And not only that, but the government is deeply involved in the affairs of marriage, sending professional white-knights to extort and arrest men who’ve been used up and thrown away by women.

It also doesn’t help that the government is increasingly monopolizing violence, one of the most important value that a man possesses. And that leads to my next point.

5. Too few wars, too many men
image
I doubt these men had to think of ways to entertain women like a monkey to get their attention.

The recurring theme across patriarchal societies of the past and present are violence and warfare. And the most commonly associated traits of masculinity are also traits of warriors such as strength, bravery, aggression, discipline, and so on. It’s quite simple: the more violent the environment is, the more masculine men become. And the more conflicts and wars there are, the more the women depend on men—thus keeping the collective value of male population high.

It’s no coincidence that Western societies have started to feminize as they endured decades of relative peace since the end of WWII. The lack of warfare also means that there are now more young men per woman (practically 1 to 1) than there normally would have been under a warring society. Excess of men—who are also emasculated and feminized—means that the collective value of average men has dropped to a historical low, upsetting the balance of sexual marketplace in the process. Only the top 5-10% of men with the warrior traits and wealth are able to enjoy a semblance of a balanced relationship with women—and even they have to play the game.

6. The decimation of Western women

Declining marriage rates? Don’t worry, some simps will try to put a ring on their fingers.

Many Western women have been corrupted by our toxic materialist society. They are fatter, uglier, more narcissistic, more entitled, hedonistic, superficial, less faithful, and seem to think that having bitch attitude makes them hip. Women can afford to stoop low because their sex drive isn’t the same as men’s, while they couldn’t care less for love and companionship when they’re too busy with their travels and careers.

And because of all the thirsty men, women’s collective sexual market value hardly suffers while the value of those who are merely average becomes inflated beyond their real value. You only need to check out the gross discrepancies between the sexes in dating sites and apps to see how bad things are.

7. Anti-male culture

Men are all rapists waiting to be hatched out of their facade, men merely uttering a word to a woman is a harassment, men are always “mansplaining” to women, men are insecure cry-babies, men open their legs too much when they sit, men and their toxic masculinity need to be controlled, men have to do more for women, men are dominating in tech fields because of sexism, men shouldn’t say this, men shouldn’t do that, etc, etc… And of course, if men push back, they’re “misogynists.”

And we’re we still wondering why relationships are getting harder to form these days?

8. Lack of shared values

As social beings, we humans need more than economic incentives and passions to form a relationship for a family to prosper. There must be shared values.

With traditional family values under constant attack from all directions, the bonding between males and females have been reduced to mere hook-ups and economic unions. To make matters worse, many from both sides are resorting to predatory behaviors to exploit one another for either money (for women) or sex (for men), augmenting the distrust between the two sexes. Others, who either don’t want to play games or have become overtly hostile to the opposite sex, have given up on relationships entirely. This is the end result of atomization and extreme individualism under a system that destroys all values for the sake of economic advancement.

Conclusion

The destruction of sex relationship is having a negative effect on society as a whole and is transforming the demographic landscape of many Western nations. Unlike what the aesthetically-challenged feminists and the man-children crying their own way believe, men and women are not adversaries. You don’t have to be a traditionalist to see that the sex relations have gone awry due to the development of modern society and its destructive cultures.

Many Western men have already checked out or gone out to find traditional women elsewhere. But that is merely adapting to the situation; it doesn’t solve the problem at a societal level. The continuing antagonism of the sexes will eventually spread around the world. Unless the current course is somehow reversed, we can only wait and see how far the damage will run its course.

BruhYouGay #sexist reddit.com

Everybody want an Asian woman, but don't nobody want to be an Asian man.

There is a saying that black people throw around when they see a non-black person appropriating black culture popularized by comedian Paul Mooney that states "Everybody wanna be a n!gga, but don't nobody wanna be a n!gga". The idea that everyone loves black culture, but no one actually wants to be black, namely a black man. But as we know, the black stereotype is always conveniently the opposite of the Asian stereotype. Blacks are stereotyped as the pinnacle of masculinity while Asians are stereotyped as the most feminine. So if every non-black man wants to be black, then every non-Asian man must lust over Asian women. To a large degree, this is true, non-Asian men lust over Asian women because of stereotypes of submissiveness and femininity. The only men who don't drool over Asian women are Asian men, ironically. This is evidenced by the view of Asian women on this sub. But if you live in America in a moderately diverse area, chances are you see Asian women with men of other races all the damn time and never see Asian women being bashed as unattractive or undesirable. The femininity part is a little odd seeing as the vast majority of Asian women lack any breasts and butts like women of other races.
I see Asian women not only with white men but often paired with black men where I live. I wholeheartedly believe any non-Asian man with an Asian woman has zero respect for Asian men. And they know they can get away with it. Asian women get a pass for their flagrant self hatred.
Any other race of man paired with a black or Latina woman quickly finds out that he must have a deep unique genuine respect for black or Latino people, period. This is why BFXM and LFXM is much rarer than WMAF. Most white and non-black guys aren't built to bear the pressure of being seen with a black woman in public, especially an attractive one. A white or non-black man with a black woman will be called out in public if he is seen as not being "down" and dating a sister. There is a good probability that even the coolest white guy will be pressed on for being seen in public with a highly attractive black or Latina woman if he's in the wrong place at the wrong time. Because there is a double standard that discourages black women from dating out while black men do it all the time just like how white men and non-Asians hate on Asian men who date out. XMAF is normalized and accepted because both Asian females and men of other races work together to actively emasculate Asian men.

Metapedia and Ingrid Weckert #conspiracy en.metapedia.org

[From the article "Western Holocaust camps"]

Holocaust revisionists argue that catastrophic conditions in Germany at the end of the war (caused by factors such Allied bombing of German infrastructure) caused large scale epidemics and malnutrition in many camps (and elsewhere in Germany). American and British forces arrived at western camps located in western Germany at the end of the war in 1945. Soon photographs and movies showing scenes due to starvation and epidemics were widely shown and framed as showing German mass killings. Allied psychological warfare units are argued to have played important parts in creating this impression. See also the article on Holocaust documentary evidence and the section "Photographs of heaps of corpses and emaciation" and "Movies" on these widely published photographs and movies from the Western Holocaust camps.

Allied propaganda had long before this claimed mass killings in camps and the Soviets had already in 1944 reached the Majdanek camp and used it for propaganda claims of German mass killings (somewhat later other camps in Poland and eastern Germany were used similarly). However, the false propaganda claims used by the Allies during the First World War against Germany were widely known and many distrusted Communist propaganda. Thus, the photographs and movies from the western camps were likely influential in convincing many that the politically correct view on the Holocaust was correct and not just wartime propaganda. Later, after German mass gassings/killings had become an established Truth, many of the early claims regarding the western camps were abandoned.

[...]

While many of the early claims regarding the western camps have been abandoned, there are still contradictory "mainstream" views on the presence of some homicidal gas chambers and some experimental/comparatively small scale gassings in some of the western camps. Some mainstream sources reject this, other support this, with some claims alleging thousands of gas victims. In the museums of several of the former camps there are sites where homicidal gas chambers are alleged to have been located. In Dachau an alleged homicidal gas chamber is even shown in its alleged original condition (see below).

On the other hand, there is a consensus that earlier allegations of gas chambers/gas chambers killings in some camps, such as in Buchenwald and Bergen-Belsen, were false, despite earlier being supported by "witnesses" and "confessors".

[...]

The revisionist Jürgen Graf has written that "Some of the camps continued operation after the war, this time with allied personnel and German prisoners who were considered a threat to allied security or who were opposed to occupational policies. Especially infamous in this regard is the Sachenshausen camp under Soviet control, but even the American operated Dachau camp served as a concentration camp after the war. One of the prisoners held captive by the Americans in Dachau published a diary, which is interesting reading especially when compared with the diary of a prisoner who was in the same camp under German rule, i.e., during the war. In an analysis, Ingrid Weckert has juxtaposed both diaries and by so doing, was able to show that conditions in the Dachau camp were considerably better under German rule than they were under U.S. military rule – except for the very last months of the war, when the German infrastructure had broken down and the inmates, like everybody in Germany, suffered terribly due to lack of all supplies."

Sub8IsIncel #sexist reddit.com

Tons of the top tier stacy thots during highschool (like the 9/10 or 10/10 stacies with DD and IG model asses) all dated guys that were 19-22 and were chad as fuck. One girl was 16 and was dating a giga chad 20-year-old guy that always picked her up from school in his Lexus sports car. Tons of people knew and no one really ever gave her shit about it or called him a creep because he was a chad.

If it was a 20-year-old guy and she was dating him because he was rich, then teachers and other people would've been stepping in and intervening. But since it was chad literally having underage sex where teachers and many people knew about it, no one cares and nothing happens.

He ended up cheating on her btw.

The ONLY TIME a guy will ever cheat on a girl is when it's a chad. Men never cheat, it's always the female and then somehow men are always the cheaters??? I literally cannot name a single person that I know who got cheated on where they were the ones who cheated. Every single person I know who has broken up with someone over cheating, it was the girl cheating. All stories of people cheating at my school? It was the girl cheating. The few occasional times you hear about a guy cheating? The 6'4" turbo chad football lacrosse basketball player. All of the girls talk about it, then they still continue to date and fuck him...

Erothos #sexist incels.co

Lesbianism is a mental illness.

Lately there's a great influx of lesbian characters in interactive movie type video games like Life is Strange, Last of Us and now The Walking Dead. These kinds of games have quite a big female population.

What is this? I mean female promiscuity is not only accepted by most ''dudebro'' types and other guys love seeing them in ''action'' but these games are pushing it a level further. The girls ''ain't need no man'' and usually mock and put down men. It's conditioning women into genuine lesbianism which is fucked because if they don't leave their gay little phase quick enough they turn irredeemable hate roasts who harbour resentment at their rejection from the male sex.

According to the CDC Sexual Violence Survey 67,4% of lesbian women encounter abuse by their partner, the second most, apart from bisexual women. Seeing as heterosexual females encounter less abuse than lesbian women it's safe to say bisexual women are being abused by their female counterparts.
Lesbians also hold resentment towards bisexual women and most bisexual women allegedly end up in straight relationships.
https://www.google.nl/amp/s/m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_58c1a38be4b054a0ea68e31c/amp
https://www.google.nl/amp/amp.slate.com/blogs/outward/2016/05/04/over_80_percent_of_bisexuals_end_up_in_straight_relationships_why.html

Female promiscuity is historic. Men have always preferred bisexual women to straight women because it both makes cuckoldry (bearing another man's child) unlikely because the women can fuck and cheat with other women and because a harem getting along means your children have more moms to support them.

This idea comes from a ''controversial'' study (http://psycnet.apa.org/record/2016-20776-001[url]) that the gay community and the media are pretty pissed about ([url]https://www.iflscience.com/editors-blog/male-scientist-claims-lesbianism-evolved-because-men-like-it-gay-community-disagrees/).

(Note how they describe him as a male scientist as if that has any impact on the study. Pavlov not being a dog apparently makes his study invalid.)

What I'm building up to is that dykes are the female equivalent of incels that have an easier time hooking up because of their sexual promiscuity and are treated like a victimized group on account of the fact they're technically operating in love, gays have been persecuted before, and dudebros idealise lesbianism in porn and games.

Lesbians are, indeed, failures, it turns out.
https://www.google.nl/amp/s/www.independent.co.uk/news/science/attractive-women-more-likely-to-be-100-heterosexual-claims-new-study-10470599.html%3famp
Theyre not all Malena Morgan and Eufrat, most of them are fucking rejects and otherwise female incels.

What I am recommending is to stop the brainwash of the female youth into thinking lesbianism is hot and positive when it'll bring them misery, and to stop the brainwash of ourselves that's driven by our prehistoric drive to fuck.
Do not consume lesbian media.
Do not consune lesbian porn.
Spread awareness if you can about the negative effects of lesbianism and suggest that lesbians are our counterpart.

I don't know how effective such a campaign would be but if lesbianism started being rejected by men (the majority of consumers of such media) maybe we can reclaim some women and rid ourselves of inceldom.

Not all of these lesbians are ugly misandryst dykes, some are actually redeemable.
image

David Chase Taylor #conspiracy truthernews.wordpress.com

SWITZERLAND, Zurich — Based on breaking news and events, it appears that CIA Headquarters beneath Lake Geneva (known locally in Switzerland as the FIS or Federal Intelligence Service) is hiding the fact that Queen Elizabeth II died, most likely on or around December 20, 2016.

In order to muddy the waters in respect to the delayed announcement of the Queen’s death, an Express report from January 10, 2017, curiously stated that “Users of social networks suppose that the death of the Queen maybe needed to be kept secret for a little while for some necessary procedures”.

The notion that news of the Queen’s death will be delayed was confirmed, albeit in a de facto manner, by a Yahoo News report from January 4, 2017, entitled “What Would The Queen’s Funeral Be Like?” which stated that “In case the Queen passes away during the night…an announcement would not be made until 8:00 AM the following morning”.

The death of the 90-year old Queen is evidently being delayed by the CIA in order to maximize the funeral’s political distraction for nefarious reasons. In other words, the CIA wants the Queen’s death and subsequent funeral to coincide with other geopolitical events which they do not want the global public to pay attention to.

The Queen’s death will likely be declared at some point in January of 2017, most likely when the CIA stages a de facto coup in America whereby soon-to-be dictator President Obama stays in office, most likely in the aftermath of a “National Emergency” due to a terror attack, foreign invasion and/or natural disaster.

The notion that the Queen’s funeral is currently being planned was confirmed by a December 30, 2016, report from the International Business Times which revealed that “preparations have already been made” for the Queen’s funeral which is slated to be the “biggest event in recent British history as well as one of huge global significance”.

Due to the CIA-run media, the entire world will be focused on the country of Britain, the Royal Family, and of course the Queen who will lie in state for 12-days prior to her made-for-TV funeral, giving the CIA plenty of time to pull a political fast one in America or elsewhere.

The notion that the Queen’s impending funeral will be a political distraction of epic proportions was foreshadowed by a Business Insider report from January 1, 2017, entitled “The Death of Queen Elizabeth Will be the Most Disruptive Event in Britain in the Last 70 Years” which revealed that the “Britain will grind to a halt” once the Queen is declared dead.

The aforementioned report stated that the Queen’s death and funeral will: a) cost the British economy billions in lost earnings due to the chaos, b) temporarily close banks and stock markets, c) trigger a brief resurrection of the British Empire, d) convene the “Accession Council”, and e) possibly bring an end the British Commonwealth.

Although only conjecture, it appears that the Queen’s death will bring about a New World Order whereby the United Kingdom will replace the United States as the World’s dominant superpower. This will likely transpire when the United Kingdom and the British Commonwealth are resurrected underneath the leadership of King Charles.

1. THE ROYAL.UK PSYOP
Just hours prior to publishing this Truther.org report on January 10, 2017, the CIA staged a PSYOP (psychological operation) in order to circumvent the validity of this story by claiming that Russian news is now reporting that the Queen is dead based off an official report posted at http://www.royal.uk. That is to say that news about the Queen’s actual death will now be chalked up to a “fake news” story from Russia. As detailed in the Express report from January 10, 2017, entitled “Russian Media Sent Into Frenzy Over ‘Fake News’ Story Claiming That The Queen Has Died“, the report from http://www.royal.uk was headlined ‘Death of Queen Elizabeth II’. Although Buckingham Palace denied the authenticity of the report, screenshots show what appears to be the start of a statement from the Press Secretary to the Queen which states, “Prince Charles with the greatest sadness has asked for the following announcement to….”. Curiously, the rest is not shown. Buckingham Palace has also denied reports that the story was posted on the official Royals website only to be removed. Russia’s largest tabloid, Komsomolskaya Pravda, published a story on the Queen’s death entitled “The Website of the Royal Family has Urgently Removed Information about the Death of Elizabeth II” which stated that “The official website of the British royal family has posted news about the death of Queen Elizabeth II but later urgently removed it”. Interestingly, the report also stated that “Users of social networks suppose that the death of the queen maybe needed to be kept secret for a little while for some necessary procedures”. Needless to say, the timing of the CIA-spawned PSYOP is highly suspicious and suggests that the CIA is trying to muddy the waters in respect to this report. If the Queen were actually alive, there would be no need to keep perpetrating Queen death hoax rumors.

THE ZOMBIE QUEEN HAS RISEN
The date of December 20, 2016, is significant because it was the last time the Queen was seen alive. That is of course until she allegedly attended a church service at St. Mary Magdalene in Sandringham, Norfolk some 19-days later. Her purported appearance on January 8, 2017, was allegedly photographed and videotaped ad nauseaum in order to sell its authenticity to the public. The mysterious appearance by the Queen came exactly 6-days after I initially began to write this report on the Queen’s death back on January 2, 2017. The timing of the Queen’s purported appearance on January 8, 2017, suggests that it was a CIA-spawned publicity stunt designed to: a) preempt this report which is destined to go viral and/or b) dissuade me from publishing this report in that the Queen is alive and well. Needless to say, the stunt did not work. Since the CIA and her sister intelligence agencies in Britain (e.g., MI5, MI6, Scotland Yard, etc.) have accounted and adequately prepared for every possibly scenario in respect to the Royal Family, it’s highly likely that the Queen’s public appearance on January 8, 2017, transpired at an earlier date prior to her death, and/or was the work of a body double (i.e., a Queen look-a-like).

3. THE QUEEN’S DEATH RUMORS
The notion that the Queen is dead is corroborated by a number of state-sponsored hoaxes which were disseminated by the CIA as a straw-man in order to: a) delegitimize any authentic reports that the Queen has died, and b) foreshadow the notion that the death of the Queen is imminent. The greatest of these hoaxes was perpetrated on December 30, 2016, when the BBC tweeted that Queen Elizabeth II had died. The allegedly fake BBC news account tweeted: “BREAKING: Buckingham Palace announces the death of Queen Elizabeth II at the age of 90. Circumstances are unknown. More to follow” (see photo above). This exact scenario was beta-tested back on July 7, 2015, when an actual BBC reporter published a Tweet confirming that the Queen had died. The latest BBC tweet was evidently designed to provide both media and political cover for the real death of the Queen which is forthcoming. Naturally, the tweet spawned thousands of subsequent reports similar to the International Business Times report from December 30, 2016, entitled “Is Queen Elizabeth ‘Death’ Announcement Real? Palace Denies Fake News Claim”. Also on December 30, 2016, Yahoo News published a report entitled “No, The Queen Isn’t Dead” which stated that “Queen Elizabeth II is fighting both a “heavy cold,” as well as some “vicious online rumors the 90-year-old queen died and a media blackout was covering up the news”. Due to the BBC tweet, Buckingham Palace was forced to report that both members of the royal family were alive and recovering from their sickness. In order to try and sell the notion that the BBC and the CIA were not behind the Queen death hoax rumors, the BBC published a report on January 5, 2017, entitled “Who Was Behind ‘Queen is Dead’ Conspiracy Hoax?”. Predictably, the report stated that the “Queen is very much alive”, an unlikely notion.

4. QUEEN NOT SEEN SINCE DECEMBER 20, 2016
The Queen has not been seen in public since December 20, 2016, which suggests that she may have died. Although the Queen allegedly made a public appearance 19-days later on January 8, 2017, the authenticity of her alleged church visit has yet to be confirmed by independent media sources. Also, no one has heard her speak since her illness. One would think the Queen would address the death rumors in a timely matter but that has not transpired to date.

5. THE QUEEN’S OUTDATED CHRISTMAS ADDRESS
Although the Queen delivered her annual Christmas speech via prerecorded message, she made no reference to currents events such as Berlin Christmas Market Attack, Brexit, or the deaths of British icons David Bowie and George Michael. She also failed to mention Britain’s new Prime Minister Theresa May who replaced David Cameron on July 13, 2016. Instead, the Queen referenced the 2016 Summer Olympics. This suggests that the recording was filmed weeks if not months prior. In what appears to be political cover for the postmortem pre-recorded address by the Queen, the British TV show entitled ‘The Windsors‘ produced a Christmas Special in which “Bumbling Charles (Harry Enfield) had to deliver his first ever Christmas speech to the nation after the BBC accidentally taped over the Queen’s pre-recorded message“.

6. THE QUEEN’S ‘HEAVY COLD’
Although only conjecture, it appears that the Queen finally succumbed an illness on or about December 20, 2016, the last time she was seen in public. Her vaniching act form public life has since been chalked up to a “heavy cold”. A spokesman from Buckingham Palace stated that “The Queen and Duke of Edinburgh continue to recover from their heavy colds”. Secondary reports stated that the Queen “does not yet feel ready to attend church as she is still recuperating from a heavy cold”. The term “heavy cold” was likely disseminated into order to foreshadow the notion that the Queen’s body is cold and that she will not be recovering anytime soon. Although the Queen has allegedly recovered from her heavy sickness, it’s likely in print only.

7. QUEEN ABSENT FROM CHRISTMAS & NEW YEAR’S CHURCH SERVICES
In the event that the Queen was actually alive, it would stand to reason that her ‘heavy cold’ would not deter her from fulfilling her civil duties as the Supreme Governor of the Church of England, especially with the aid of modern medicine. Nevertheless, the Queen was absent from Christmas Day church service at Sandingham for the first time in 28-years. Roughly a week later, the Queen was absent from the New Year’s Day church service at Sandingham for the first time in “many years”. The fact that the Queen was not able to muster a public appearance on these key dates suggests that she was not able to walk, likely due to the fact that she is dead.

8. QUEEN’S FUNERAL ALREADY PLANNED
Because the Queen likely died on or around December 20, 2016, it’s highly likely that her funeral will be closed casket as her body will have deteriorated since her passing roughly 5-weeks prior. Roughly 10-days after the Queen’s last public appearance, Metro published a report on December 30, 2016, entitled “Here’s What Would Happen When the Queen Dies” which speculated about the Queen’s impeding demise. That same day, December 30, 2016, the International Business Times published a report entitled “Queen Elizabeth’s Death Has Been Planned For Years: Funeral Arrangements Are Regularly Updated For British Monarch”. The report revealed the Queen’s funeral “would likely take place 12 days after the Queen’s death” and that the BBC “conducts rehearsals for how it will deal with the Queens’s death”. Also on December 30, 2016, the Irish Times published a report entitled “Braced for Brexit – And the Death of Queen Elizabeth” which stated that “At some stage the longest-reigning monarch in British history will be buried with all the pomp and circumstance that the global leaders in this field can muster”. If the Queen were alive as purported, these type of reports would not be allowed to be published, especially in the United Kingdom where the Queen is God.

9. KING CHARLES FORESHADOWING
Because the Queen evidently died on or around December 20, 2016, speculation has begun in the media that Prince Charles is about to become the King of England. This was never more obvious than when the International Business Times published a report on January 2, 2017, entitled “Who Will Be King? After Queen Elizabeth Dies, Prince Charles Could Spark ‘Constitutional Crisis'”. The notion that Prince Charles will become King of England was also foreshadowed by “King Charles III” (2014), a play in blank verse by Mike Bartlett. It premiered at the Almeida Theatre, London, in April 2014 and centers on the accession and reign of King Charles III of the United Kingdom.

10. THE DELAYED MEDIA DEATH
The notion that the CIA would delay the news of a head of state for nefarious reasons is not that farfetched for it has been done on multiple occasions prior. The best example to date is that of Nelson Mandela, the former President of South Africa and noted civil rights leader. Mandela, who had not been seen in public since July 10, 2010, allegedly died on December 5, 2013. A day later, on December 6, 2013, Mandela’s last photo which was allegedly taken on April 29, 2013, was released to the public in order to sell the notion that he had been alive the entire time. The death of Mandela was evidently delayed in order to coincide with President Barack Obama’s historic visit to Africa where he able to grandstand on the international stage during the made-for-TV funeral. Obama showed his respect for Mandela by flirting with the blonde female Danish Prime Minister and taking a selfie with other heads of state.

Steven R. #fundie simplychristian.fandom.com

Sermon 11: The New IFB

By Bro. Steven R.

Psalm 51:10 “Create in me a clean heart, O God; and renew a right spirit within me.”

Pastor Steven Anderson held the “Make America Straight Again” conference in Orlando recently. He was responding to the worldliness of the wicked sodomite reprobates who are recruiting our impressionable youth with candy and fun carnival games and watching carnjval barkers in funny costumes do wacky stuff. The the drag queens and transsexuals take off their clothes and the wicked police force does nothing to enforce public nudity laws!

Satan’s own harlot, Taylor Swift, released a video for her “hit” new single “You Need to Calm Down.” Drag queen and transsexual galore! They mocked Christians as uneducated hicks who can’t spell! I don’t know about you, but I for one am appalled because I am a college graduate!!!!!! I graduated top of my class at Bob Jones University back in the day!

The Old IFB has become very worldly, enjoying smut like a Taylor Swift videos that celebrate sodomy as well as feature Taylor Swift wearing immodest garments like lingerie and a bikini! She also had fake hair dye that apparently is of the bisexual colors! Confirms that she’s a bisexual and engaged in lesbianism with Karlie Kloss! The Old IFB is also okay with wicked video games like Call of Duty and Grand Theft Auto and Super Mario Odyssey! Horrendously wicked sinfulness! The Bible says to be IN the world but not OF the world! Apparently they hath not the salt of the sea! We need to rise up and join in the NEW IFB and have a grand spiritual revival! CAN I GET AN AMEN?!!!

W. F. Price #sexist web.archive.org

I’ve seen a lot of people in the manosphere blame women’s suffrage for many of the excesses of feminism. “If only women hadn’t been granted the franchise,” they say, “we could have avoided all of these problems.” Sure, that’s probably true, but in a one person one vote system like Democracy, politicians will always have an incentive to extend the franchise, as we are seeing today with the Democrats’ push to give illegal immigrants citizenship.

There’s a simple explanation for it:

Say you’re a politician who wants to keep his job, and you have an opportunity to gain a lot of grateful, supportive voters who will keep you in office. If you’re ambitious like most politicians, you’ll do what you can to make that a reality. When that chunk of potential supporters actually exceeds 50% of the adult population, as women do, you’ve got an enormous incentive to be the guy who gave them the vote. This would give you great job stability.

Maybe some male voters would drop their support for a candidate based on that issue, but knowing men most would not, and even if a politician lost a large proportion of his male supporters, he could still come out ahead with significant female support, which would be all but guaranteed if he were the one who gave them the vote.

As one can deduce from simple arithmetic, the more voters one stands to gain, the stronger the incentive. I’m not sure what percentage a given population of non-voters has to reach to provide a strong enough incentive for a politician to defy his constituents on their behalf, but it’s probably far lower than 50%. I’d guess it’s around 15-20%, which suggests that if illegal aliens came to be that large a proportion of the national population, there would be overwhelming pressure to give them the vote. Whatever the number is, I think this would be the sort of thing on which a statistician could base a revealing study.

So why weren’t women given the vote immediately after Democracy was implemented in the US? First, most of them didn’t ask for it or care much about it. Female literacy wasn’t all that high in the early 19th century. Then, there’s the fact that traditions – even newly established ones – are more firmly followed in young, vigorous nations. Finally, in pre-industrial America men and women had essentially the same interests, so for most of the country the idea that there was a conflict of interest between the sexes was simply an alien notion, and therefore men and women in a given family would vote the same anyway.

The latter is highlighted by one of the first states to attempt to legalize women’s suffrage: Utah. Because polygamy was still common in Utah in the mid 19th century, giving women the vote would substantially increase Mormon clout relative to non-Mormon neighbors. The Mormons did in fact give their women the vote, and they promptly voted in favor of polygamy and other Mormon norms, which ultimately triggered the federal suppression of traditional Mormonism and the delay in granting women suffrage in other parts of the US.

As we can see from the above, there will always be an incentive for some people to grant universal suffrage, and all it takes is one change to the law for it to become permanent. Therefore, if a country bases its political process on the one person one vote standard, women’s suffrage is all but a certainty.

Lord Tebbit #fundie guardian.co.uk

The determination of David Cameron to press ahead with legalising gay marriage opens up the possibility of a lesbian queen giving birth to a future monarch by artificial insemination, Lord Tebbit has warned...

"I said to a minister I know: have you thought this through? Because you're doing the law of succession, too.

"When we have a queen who is a lesbian and she marries another lady and then decides she would like to have a child and someone donates sperm and she gives birth to a child, is that child heir to the throne?"

Tebbit joked that the change could allow parents to marry their children as a way of avoiding inheritance tax. "It's like one of my colleagues said: we've got to make these same sex marriages available to all. It would lift my worries about inheritance tax because maybe I'd be allowed to marry my son. Why not? Why shouldn't a mother marry her daughter? Why shouldn't two elderly sisters living together marry each other?"

caamib #sexist reddit.com

This is the brief story of my second gf and her silly, irrational actions. Bear in mind, she is likely my best female friend today.

1.I meet her on a dating site. She just broke up with her boyfriend. I'm still a virgin at the time and she's very uninterested in meeting, wasting our time in fruitless bs talks about nothing.
2.I lose my virginity with some slut and tell this to her. She
a) immediately goes back to her ex AND b)immediately wants a meeting with me
3.We meet and she wants me, not her bf
4.She breaks up with her bf and says she wants to be with me
5.She meets me the second time after this. But now I'm no longer interesting to her. Now she blocks me on Fb.
6.She wants to get back to her "bf", he doesn't want her back.
7.Three months pass. She contacts me again, asking me to solve some fucking problem of hers. I decline and block her on Facebook. She then sends me an SMS, offering sex.
8.She tries to torture me by making up excuses to "give up" on sex and then offering it again ( she later, when we were already in a relationship, admitted these were all fake "changes of mind").
9.I finally snap and post her pic on my blog. She then finally agrees to really have sex with me - under the condition that I no longer contact her.
10.We have sex and I no longer contact her. But she contacts me. (EDIT - some of the insaner manginas online used to claim she did so because she was afraid I'd "blackmail" her again. However, that's just insanity by manginas, since when we stopped contacting I had no more pics of her. When she contacted me again I was BACK ON HER FRIEND LIST AND COULD SEE ALL HER PICS AGAIN). So we start a relationship.
11.Our relationship is a joke and she is a crazy woman.
12.We finally, after about a month and a half, see it's not working and break it off.
13.She briefly goes back to her previous "bf" who fucks her once but then dumps him as well.
14.After some months of me doing other stuff we get back in contact and are friends now. She's a lesbian now. She destroys her relationship with some woman.
Still, in summer of 2014 she start dating one of my best friends but dumps him after a week or two, before they even had sex, because she now finally decided to be a full lesbian.
15.In early 2015 she has such a fight with her schizophrenic mother that she has to come to my place, which I don't want to allow her without fucking me. She does and is angry about it for some time, making a fuss over nothing, but eventually we go on being friends like nothing happened. After all, by that time connections are too strong and we share even some financial interests, along with co-operation in various areas. We depend on each other too much in any case. This helps mend any conflicts but the fact is also that we're by now used to each other and share some common traits - it's not like hate each other but have to tolerate each other. I like her as a person and we share a history.

Lessons:

modern Western women are completely insane. It's a waste of time to try and find logic in the actions. What they do is often as random as throwing a dice. So don't expect anything, especially anything good.

actual full lesbians don't exist

women in general base their appreciation of a man on how successful he is in attracting other women - how this is achieved and his objective qualities are irrelevant. You can be a smelly rapist with an IQ of 70, she will like you more than a virgin with an IQ of 170.

consent is a nonsensical concept in modern society. It's a word that is used to protect female chastity and husband's property, not ignoring the whims of some slut. Modern Western women will hate you if you think about consent. You need to show you have a spine and fuck them regardless of their stupid whims, or they won't respect you.

Relationships in the modern Western world are a joke. Your "gf's" or "wife's" pussy is everybody else's as well as "yours" - and laws are made that way too. There is basically nothing a husband or a boyfriend can do about a cheating wife and pathetic cucks will always protect these sluts. So have no qualms about fucking other men's wives or girlfriends in the West - if you won't somebody else will. Besides, the guy they claim to be with is doing the same to other men's "gf's" and "wives". Expect absolutely no fidelity of any "gf" you will have in a feminist culture - it's like expecting a cat to not eat that steak when you leave the cat with it in a room to go grocery shopping. Fidelity is achieved in a sane patriarchal culture by marrying women off as virgins, making being a slut an undesirable trait and not allowing any feminist laws. In the Western culture your "gf's" or "wives" pussy is E-V-E-R-Y-B-O-D-Y'S and she is not fit to be a caring wife and a mother. You will be raising some retard's children, not your own.

Joshua Bonehill #fundie nationalistresistance.com

1) A Bonehillist will not defend himself to the Left-Wing or anybody for that fact under Any circumstance. All bonehillists are morally superior and righteous in their argument so therefore there is no need to defend yourself when you encounter an attack – go on the offence instead.

2) As a Bonehillist, it is your duty to protect the British public from the lie that is political correctness. When you encounter PC criminality you should do your best to expose it and attack the source to stop the pollution.

3) Metrosexualism is strictly forbidden for all males who identify with Bonehillism. We recognise that Metrosexualism is a perverse tactic used by the Left-wing to feminise masculinity and We believe that men should be men.

4) As a Bonehillist, you will always be required to help your fellow countrymen In times of need. We believe in social nationalism and want to create a society where neighbours help each other and our society pulls together in order to repair society. You will help your neighbour and do your best for your people.

5) Shopping at massive corporate owned American superstores is strictly forbidden, we support the smaller man and encourage all bonehillists to shop locally in small independent stores. Support the green grocer, the butcher and the local corner store. The only supermarket permitted for use by bonehillists is Waitrose because they are owned by the employees who benefit from the business In a fair and equal way.

6) All Bonehillists must maintain a degree of personal hygiene. We are not like the Left-Wing who refuse to wash so therefore we will be clean, free and fresh in appearance. Short cropped hair is advised for males but not mandatory.

7) Bonehillists will only buy British, buying something that has been made in another country is supporting their economy and that could be seen as treachery. Grow your own produce and double check the products you’re buying to ensure that they have been made in this country.

8) baggy or loose clothing is strictly forbidden. As touched on with rule number 6, Bonehillists are smart and clean in appearance. All items of ‘Chav’ clothing should be disposed of before you even consider becoming a Bonehillist.

9) Bonehillists do not cheat on their partners, they are loyal and respective of their relationships.

10) A Bonehillist will always help his fellow Bonehillist first over all other people. If a ‘comrade’ is in need of help then you will always help him first.

11) After speaking to a fellow Bonehillist it is courteous to say “Bonehill Be With you” and he will respond “And with you”. This is done as a degree of respect to the Founder and acknowledgement of ones position within Bonehillism.

12) Bonehillists will respect the law of the land, if they fall foul of it and suspect they have been wrongly accused then it will be fought out in the court of law with full Bonehillist support.

13) Bonehillists will fly both the Union Jack and St George’s cross flags from their home. This can either be done by hanging the flag from a window outside or by suspending the flag by flag pole in the garden.

14) Bonehillists are not permitted to be a member of any Unions as they are evil perverse Left-Wing traps.

15) Bonehillists will not legitimise the Left-Wing, under no circumstance is conversation between a leftist renegade and a Bonehillist permitted. The left-wing only vent poison and lies, do not corrupt your mind with the filth – ignore them instead.

16) Bonehillists must address the founder himself as “The Founder” or “Leader”, again this is done as a mark of respect towards the divine providence of the founder who rules over Bonehillism with an iron fist.

17) Mega Morbid obesity is not permitted within Bonehillism, a Bonehillist must maintain a healthy body and reject fast food. Obesity is a disease created by the Left-Wing to kill off the British people.

18) A Woman must never question the authority of a man. A Bonehillist male is viewed as the “Pack Leader” and main bread winner of the household. The male will offer protection and a roof for the female and maintain household authority whilst the woman will engage in feminine activity that doesn’t overtake the mans standing within the household.

19) The music of Billy Bragg is strictly forbidden to the ears of all Bonehillists.

20) Bonehillists must never question the authority of the founder. The Founder himself has a Job to do and is always right in all of his decisions. There is only one leader of Bonehillism and that is Joshua Bonehill.

privacyplease1234567 #fundie reddit.com

I've been a longstanding member and contributor to this subreddit and the LGBTQ community, but because of the nature of this subject, and the taboos that go along with it, I'm going to reply using this new account, both for my own privacy, and because I've seen firsthand what accusations of even just sympathy for pedophiles can do to a person's reputation. I know we in the LGBTQ community feel like we have been victimized by society's bigotries and for most of us violence or the threat of violence has been a way of life at various points in our lives. What we have been through, or continue to go through, is really nothing compared to what pedophiles go through, and anyone even suspected of being one is treated like an absolute monster. Imagine not only being physically assaulted, but being under constant threat of murder and having to flee not only your home but your entire country, forced to change your name, and live a life of constant fear, not just during your childhood while there are bullies after you for being "different", but forever. That is what pedophile activists have and continue to face. There's no "It Gets Better" for pedophiles. I'm not willing to risk my own account here and good name to discuss this very taboo and dangerous subject. I think it's incredibly brave of you, silentGL, to even come here and speak to us. I hope you're taking precautions and staying safe.

To answer your questions first: 1) Yes. It is clear by any reasonable definition that MAPs are a GSM. I also think it's shameful and cowardly that we in the LGBTQ community kicked you guys out way back when just to make our own lives moderately easier. Furthermore I think that MAPs will eventually gain more public acceptance and that history will look back at what we did and judge us poorly for it. I think it may have even set some of us in the GSM community back, and made it easier for those resisting social change to divide us and make us weaker overall. 2) Yes. I would be open to MAPs potentially being part of the GSM community again. We never should have kicked you out to begin with. Now that homosexuals and bisexuals have largely achieved widespread acceptance, many are already separating themselves from some of the more rare gender/sexual minorities that have been left behind. Pedophilia, hebephilia, etc. would probably even be an asset since those orientations seem much more commonplace. If people can be more tolerant of MAPs as individual human beings deserving basic human dignity, they can be more tolerant of all GSMs. 3) My thoughts on MAPs overall, it's hard to say. I would like to believe that there are about as many rapists among MAPs as there are rapists among any other sexual orientation. In other words, a small minority of individuals with violent or sociopathic tendencies who aren't interested in having sex as much as they are interested in control and power, and forcible sex is their means of getting that power. I have read that a large number of convicted child molesters have no preferential sexual interest in children, but that children made for a convenient target while they were in the mood to hurt somebody. It's a shame that these criminals, many of whom are not actually MAPs, have painted your entire sexual orientation as monsters.

I do have some personal experience with a minor-attracted person, who I guess would be more precisely classified as a pedophile. When I was five and six years old, a family friend/neighbor and I developed a very strong bond. He was the complete opposite of the pedophile stereotype. He was handsome, he was very sociable and confident, and he was the gentlest person I've ever known. My parents would have him baby sit me, either at his house or mine, and we got along great. I loved and trusted him, and he never had to tell me he loved me back, it was clear in his actions from the very start. He wasn't like other adults, he respected me as an individual, showed he cared what I had to say and genuinely wanted to know what I was thinking. He didn't bully me or boss me around like other adults, or ignore my thoughts and feelings, or treat me as being somehow less than because of my age. I could tell he was different, and I think he knew I was different too.

All the talk from people answering silentGL's questions, saying stuff about kids being unable to consent, I find it remarkable. How many of you knew from an early age that you were different, that your feelings about gender or sexuality were different from other kids? How would you feel if somebody told you you didn't know what you were talking about, that your feelings are irrelevant or unimportant when you're that age? I remember very clearly coming out to my parents in 8th grade, and the hurt I felt when they belittled my orientation as "just a phase". They didn't trust me to make up my own mind about my sexuality then, and many of you are doing the same now to every child that might want a relationship with an adult. You should all take a closer examination of your own childhood feelings. You knew more about yourself back then than you are giving kids credit for today.

Anyway, I was different, and so was he. We both knew it without saying a word. He was the only adult I could really talk to about it though. My parents were conservative and kept pushing me into being more girly, more "normal". They didn't get me, but my closest friend, an adult male, he loved me for me. He encouraged me to play how I wanted, and feel how I wanted, and he'd always listen with great care and attention to when I said things about feeling different from other girls. See, I knew I was supposed to like boys, and I did like boys. But I also liked girls. I was six years old and already knew I was bisexual, I just didn't have the vocabulary for it or knew what sex was all about. This man, this pedophile, he not only accepted me for my orientation, but he told me there was nothing wrong with it either. He encouraged me to express myself, he let me draw pictures of two girls holding hands and being married. If I did that at home, my mom would frown and tell me that couldn't happen and that I should only draw pictures of a boy and a girl living together in a house.

When I was seven years old, the relationship I had with my much older neighbor did become something more than just close friendship. My curiosities about sex led me to very aggressively proposition him. There will be those who say he groomed me, or somehow manipulated me into a sexual relationship, but I was the seducer and he was one of the best lovers I've ever had. One of the reasons I am writing this using a new anonymous account is because I don't want this story to ever be traced back to him. I will always protect him, because even now many years later, I still love him and think of those afternoons at his house with nothing but fondness. I am insulted by those questioning my ability to consent to that relationship, which lasted a full five happy years before I felt I ought to end it, and I can only laugh at the irony of people in this community claiming an unconventional relationship like ours can only result in harm to the child. I ended the relationship, by the way, because I didn't want to hurt him by cheating on him, and at the time I was falling in love with a girl at my school. He was disappointed, but respected my decision, and never pressured me into any more sex even though we continued to be close friends for many years after.

The confidence and strength he gave me growing up, not only in my own sexuality but in myself as a person, is really what helped me survive the hardest years of middle school and high school, struggling to be a bi girl whose parents thought it was just a phase, and the many cruelties that other children heaped on her. It didn't matter that our sexual relationship had ended, I could still go over to that man's house after school and cry on his shoulder and tell him about my awful day. He'd hug me and tell me things would get better, and that the people who hated me were just stupid and ignorant. He wasn't somebody who had exploited me, or used me, he was a man who loved me, the whole me, and always treated me with respect and dignity.

While I cannot say for certain that every MAP in the world is like that man I knew, I do know men like him do exist, and can be a positive in the life of a child. I still get so much strength from his words to me when I was young. When I am having sex today, with a man or a woman, I always remember my first time not as a traumatic experience, but as the high bar of which I judge the generosity and respect I receive in my intimate encounters as an adult. I am not ashamed of my sexuality, precisely because that generous and loving man from my childhood taught me about how natural and wonderful it can be to express, with anyone I love. I learned from him that love is never wrong, and I have the self-esteem and self-respect to know what I deserve in relationships and demand I get it.[It breaks my heart to think that man I loved as a young girl would be arrested, called a monster, and locked away for loving me as much as I loved him.

So yes, silentGL, I have empathy for your kind, just as I have empathy for people of all kinds. I will judge you and others of your sexual orientation on a case-by-case basis, as individuals capable of both good and evil, the same as people of any sexual orientation. I have no more or less reason to be suspicious of you, as I would be suspicious of anyone else. I do hope that, whether you act on your feelings or not, you keep yourself safe and you always show respect for the dignity of those you are attracted to. I hope the world can change for you as much as I've already seen it change for me, and continues to hopefully change for all of us. I hope others who are like me, and remember now as adults such relationships as joyful loving occasions, will also speak out.

Leonard Sisyphus Mann #fundie consentinghumans.wordpress.com

Though most paedophile-child relationships are chaste there is a significant proportion in which the child wishes for, and consents to, intimacy.

One of the fallacious uses of language common in the popular discourse round this issue is to talk about paedophiles wanting, or having, ‘Sex’ with children. To most non-paedophiles ‘sex’ means ‘intercourse’ and so by a leap of logic the public thinks of paedophiles as wanting to have intercourse with children. This is wrong. What the typical paedophiles think of as ‘sex’ differs from what adult teleiophiles consider as ‘sex’.

The most important difference is that any form of penetration cannot have the same place it has in adult-adult relationships: the typical paedophile would not wish to do anything that the child would not enjoy, be hurt by or that would betray the trust and friendship shared by the adult and child.

Rather than the adult imposing his desires on the child it is very much about allowing the child to determine what takes place and responding to the child’s interest, – much as an adult playing football with a 7-year old adapts his mode of play to ensure that the experience is enjoyable and constructive for the child so does a caring paedophile.

Essentially what most ‘turns on’ a paedophile is a happy, relaxed child who is herself turned-on and enjoying herself – forcing or manipulating a child would be repugnant to the normal paedophile.

‘Sexual’ activities, if they occur at all, range from playful sensuality (tickling, kissing and stroking…) to acts that would be classed as ‘foreplay’ in the context of adult-adult sex.

Phil O'Sophical #fundie freeconservatives.com

[Re. a mosque being built near Ground Zero]

That big 'ol, glaring and super-conspicuous mosque will be the newest collective symbol to remind Americans that they should feel guilt for being so mean to minorities. It'll be like going to confession for all of America. Whenever they pass by it, they will be compelled to render a respectful Muslin salute; bow; and beg for forgiveness.

Whenever assertive minorities get into the faces of guilt-laden Americans, Americans respect them even more. Respect is a euphemism for fear.

It may be recalled that in the wake of 9/11, guilty Americans expressed an immediate outpouring of love and support for the entire Muslim world. Some angry conservatives predicted a Muslim backlash. Other than a few petty, juvenile acts of vandalism and keyboard patriotism, there was no backlash whatsoever. Americans even elected a Muslim president!

Wow! The Stockholm Syndrome in all its 13-story glaring glory.

O Allah! It is written. HA-HA-HA-HA

Dry Spell #sexist incels.co

'Ugly Guys with Girlfriends' do NOT disprove anything - they are getting cheated on.

1.) There is a 100% chance an ugly or fat guy with a girlfriend is getting cheated on.
2.) If she hasn't cheated on him yet, she is planning to.
3.) And even if she's not planning to, femoids are shallow and easily tempted. All she has to do is walk to the grocery store and she will inevitably get hit on and will stray from the relationship.

In order for her not to cheat on this ugly guy, he would have to:
A) confiscate her phone
B) delete all her social media accounts
C) Keep her indoors always, don't even let her go to the deli or grocery store unsupervised.
D) Domesticate her, teach her to be a good barefood waifu and to cook and clean, all things femoids are naturally good at. Actually, it's the only thing femoids are good at besides manipulation.
E) physical punishment if she steps out of line. By stepping out of line I mean not having dinner prepared when the guy comes home.
F) Blind her with bleach or acid lest her eyes wander towards other men.
G.) Mentally abuse her to shatter her confidence the point where she is mentally unable to leave the relationship.
H.) Install WiFi cameras/Baby Monitors around the house so the man can monitor the woman while he's at work and make sure she isn't ruining the relationship while wagecuck betabux is busting his balls to financially support her fake-up collection.

HighIQPakiCel #sexist reddit.com

Cuckery Tier List - The Modern Man

Noncucked Tier - The man who

- Gives women no attention unless a return is more or less guaranteed

- Uses women for sex with no commitment (If they are capable of doing so, AKA Blackpilled Chad)

- Would only consider a relationship or marriage with a virgin

- Does not respect women who engage in any form of thottery

- Understands the biological nature of women

- Reaps what he sows financially, no other man profits off his labor (Non Wageslave)

Slightly Cucked Tier - The man who

- Wageslaves

- Watches porn

- Follows/likes women on social media

- Continuously attempts online dating despite failure

- Bluepilled to some degree

Cucked Tier - The man who

- Orbits women who would never fuck him (provides them with free validation/attention)

- Defends women online no matter how objectively wrong they are

- Dates and commits himself to nonvirgin women (Chad widows)

- Bluepilled completely

EXTREMELY CUCKED TIER - The man who

- Orbits to an extreme, providing money/resources to eThots/thots

- Dates/Marries a single mom (raises tyrones child)

- Dates/marries a woman who's 30+ (post wall woman who failed to secure chad, betabux time)

- Tolerates cheating (Actual cuck)

- Allows open Relationship (she fucks chad, he gets nothing. Actual cuck 2.0)

- Makes fun of incels online while unironically being one (IT)

THE ULTIMATE AND FINAL CUCK - The man who

- Has a daughter (Hits pipe)

So how cucked are you guys? I'm proud to say I'm 0% cucked after I escaped wageslavery.

Luka #racist answers.yahoo.com

I'm white and I'm currently dating a white blonde who was with black guys before. We are in a 2 year relationship now, I found out about the black guys some 1year after we started our relation ship and if i knew in the start I would never start dating her in the first place. I don't respect her because of what she did and I never will,and I don't see a future with her. I'm 100% not a racist, my best friend is black and he is sitting next to me as I'm writing this. I just think that girls who date black guys are just little sluts who date them coz of their cock size (no I'm not jealous because i got 27cm believe it or not, so that is not the issue for me) and therefore I think they are just used and broken goods with questionable morale. The biggest issue is that whenever I'm interracting with those girls I feel like they have some unsolved issues and really feel "broken". It's really not a racism issue, my cousin who lives in Germany is dating a black girl whom I've set im up with and to be honest no used up white girl will ever have my respect as I respect a strong black African queen my cousin is dating whom he was dating over 8months before she finally "gave it up". And one more thing, no matter how racist, liberal, retarded, stupid ,smart or whatever your family is you never fucking disrespect them, never turn your back on them and always be there for them. Nobody in this life will ever love you and care more for you than them, the family is the backbone of your existance so for all those who say "Don't listen to what your parents say as long as you think it's right" you are dumb as a rock. If you do something and it hurts your family, re think about doing it no matter how right you think you are. You wont be happy in your life without your family, trust me I've learnt that the hard way...

BIBLE_is the only way #fundie finance.yahoo.com

Christmas is the Day of Jesus. These days people should feel love for Family and our Lord. American people most of them, are sick and tired listening all this shameful topic again and again. Back in the old days of Biblical America if someone committed the sin of homosexuality he was aware of his abdominal sin, his family was ashamed, nobody talked it was really terrible even to talk about sexual abomination. But after the sixties people became totally shameless. Feminists have no respect for male authority, they have become male-hating lesbians and feminazis, hippies in drugs and crime, all those third world people came to turn the Christian family into a gay-state led by a Kenyan (as Mr Trump suggests) immigrant who has not even an American name. He turned the country into a feminist, gay, socialist, liberal Nazi Democrat state where women hate men, gays take over the government, socialist Obamacare destroys the best healthcare system in the world and the most powerful economy sinks into the chaos. Everything started in the sixties when communists took over the government under the pretense of "Democrats" But I have a question: why the most evil Anti-Christian politicians are always Democrats? why American people cannot see that Democrats are instruments of Nazi-led Europe and devil in order to attack Christian America? Now gay-led Democrats try to take over America. Americans we must be prepared for the new Nero era. Obama is the new Nero who wants to take our boys and turn them to Democratic gays. Amen. Lets, pray for the innocents. We need to vote for a Biblical American like Mr. Huckabee, Mr Perry or Mrs. Bachmann if we want to make America again the land of the free. Amen.

Roissy #racist heartiste.wordpress.com

The Truth About Mixed-Race Couples

The stereotype that black-white mixed-race couples are typically black men hooking up with trashy, fat white women has a factual basis...

...It’s fair to say the whole media industrial complex portrays the exact opposite of reality.

Stereotypes don’t materialize out of thin air. There’s a reason they exist. People notice patterns and formulate generalizations around those observed patterns.

In homogeneous societies, the most undesirable females are left without partners and go to their long dark death having failed to fulfill their genetic prime directive. End result: Humanity in such societies benefits as a whole from the eugenic cleansing. In late stage multicultural anti-societies, the slag of womanhood does an end-run around sexual selection and procreates outside their race. The question is put to the studio audience: Is this a net positive or net negative for those rainbow societies?

UPDATE

Some readers ask what is the point of posting this information? What good does it do?

Other than the obvious — rebuking the lies that the Cathedral/Synagogue/religious metaphor for the anti-white establishment of your choice churns out at an industrialized clip — I think the best reason is a psychological one:

Entrapment.

I can imagine a preening, bigoted SWPL reading this and quivering in anticipation of launching a SCIENCE-backed diatribe against those wrong kinds of white people, those slovenly rednecks the SWPL loves to hate, when suddenly it dawns on him.

“Wait… oh crap, can’t go there.”

AdAstra9191 & Animal_testing_lab #sexist reddit.com

(AdAstra9191)

Why the hell is cheating, pornography and infidelity normalized these days?

I’ve been noticing that in mainstream culture there are a lot of dumb ass excuses made up for why men in relationships get to cheat, ogle other women when they are already in a relationship, use pornography, etc etc, and most of these excuses are made up by men and the dumb women that enable their behavior. I’ve read some articles online on why cheating, ogling and watching porn is “normal male behavior” and in the comment section I’ll see pick-me bitches coddling their boyfriends’ ridiculous behavior. They’ll say, “Oh you women complaining about your man ogling other women are so insecure. It’s normal for a man to do that. When I see a hot woman in the street I will actively point out a hot woman to my boyfriend and ask him to check her out.” It sounds like these women are suffering from some kind of Stockholm Syndrome or masochistic tendencies or something. Who in their right mind would want a man who emotionally abuses them by cheating on them and lusting after other women?

It is like we are living in some kind of apocalyptic age of shitty men everywhere that have rampant sex addiction and narcissism. What is happening to the human race today?

(Animal_testing_lab)

Its is bc of the shift in who controls relationships now. Men are now in control of sex/relationships, no matter what they say, you can see it all around you. Girls want to be in relationships and men want sex. Period. It's very cut and dry. Once we girls handed them the keys to all the free sex they wanted, they changed the rules up on us. Now we have to play by they're rules. We have to accept the porn, bc if we want a relationship, we have to play by their rules. We have to accept the other girls bc if we want any of them to want us we have to play the game by their rules. Ik it sucks, but thats just the way it is. And if one girl decides to stand up for herself in order go get free from this strange place that leads to nothing she wants, she will be called a prude, and stuck up, and cast away for another girl who is will to give herself away for nothing and that girl will, be left alone.

Roy Batty #fundie dailystormer.name

[From "These Bitches are Fucking Dogs Now"]

There is an epidemic of White girl dog-fucking that has gone largely unnoticed and unreported by the mainstream media.

But occasionally we get a glimpse into the underground world of dog fucking with stories like this.

Fox News

A woman in Scotland who shot cellphone video of herself in a sex act involving her pet dog and whipped cream has pleaded guilty to two counts of possessing pornography.

[...]

The poor dog.

White women have become such fat whores that no decent man wants them. As a result, many are resorting to dog-fucking to get their fix of sexual attention. Animal rights organizations like PETA have remained completely silent on this shocking trend of abuse.

Shame on them.

The problem is hard to accurately calculate because these thots are keeping it going on the down low. Just like all those teachers secretely fucking their students, lots of these thots are doing the same with the pets that have been entrusted to them.

And they use a secret code to communicate that they are in the market, looking for dogs to bang.

But it can be cracked.

Whenever you see a girl using the dog filter on snap chat, it’s actually a code signal.

It means, “I’m looking to fuck dogs.”

In general, a good rule of thumb is that any single woman with a large dog is actually probably fucking the poor thing.

There’s no other reason for a woman to want a large male dog as a companion otherwise. Only men take an interest in dogs like that because they’re cool, fun to play with, great protection and our best friends…not our fuck buddies.

Be careful out there, Stormers.

Without White Sharia, these women are literally going crazy. We already knew they were capable of fucking animals when they started fucking niggers, but this is a new low…or an improvement, I’m not sure.

At least dogs are loyal, serve a function in society and are good around children.

Not sure what niggers have going for them when compared to niggers now that I think about it. Regardless, we opened the doors to all this madness when we repealed White Sharia and allowed mixed-race relationships.

It was only a small step to bestiality from there.

We need to do something though. Think of the poor doggos out there forced to copulate with these disgusting women.

dlo_3us2001 #fundie groups.yahoo.com

Quoting from an article entitled "Why Is The Left So Anti-Baby?"

"What about the Buddha? Here was a handsome prince that dumped his wife and kids and took up the contemplative life. Pretty soon there were Buddhist temples that were as big as cities where rich young men from all over could go and meditate"


Clearly the same thing has happened with the Priests and Pope. They gather together and then wind up homosexual. I guess they figure they can have sex, and no kids will pop out.

This just doesn't work well for society or religion.

Clearly many men have gotten tired of the way women behave now. The women are now abusing the men. They hit them and don't expect to be hit back. They cheat on the men and destroy them. Some of the women have turned to feminism and lesbianism and try to tell society that we don't need men anymore. No wonder we have so many homosexuals now. No wonder the men don't feel needed anymore.

Men have decided they don't want the extra burden of families now because kids are so expensive, wives are expensive, the women give the men no attention after the kids come.....then the KIDS rebel and turn on their fathers AND the mothers. They are unappreciative of what the parents did for them in life.

Why should the men waste their lives on women, and children when things are turning out so badly now.

Many women are feeling the same way. That is why there are so many abortions now. Women think they can jump into bed with all these men and hope that men will respect them for that.

It just doesn't work that way....for men or women.


Sandy

AWD #racist angrywhitedude.com

What this racial profiling debate comes down to is this. Blacks like the NAACP and their leftist ilk demand that blacks receive the same benefit of the doubt regarding violent crime as other racial groups even when blacks commit the vast majority. This is akin to saying, I’ll step over that rattlesnake because I bet he won’t bite me. Maybe he’s a peaceful rattlesnake.

Here’s the deal. Stereotypes, while unpopular and offensive to the ever-offended politically correct world, are usually rooted in truth. For example, think about the stereotypes of these groups:

• Mormons – large families, good neighbors, don’t smoke or drink, strange religious beliefs
• Muslims – violent repressive cult that kills or destroys everything it comes into contact with
• Texans – independent, conservative patriots who believe in the Constitution
• New Yorkers – gay
• Feminists – ugly
• Blacks – under-performers with a propensity for violence

The truth liberals and politically correct conservatives don’t want to admit but there is a great amount of truth in each of these stereotypes. Certainly there are exceptions to these stereotypes. Is every New Yorker gay? No. They’re at least bi-sexual. Is every Texan a patriot? No, we have New York transplants in Austin. Are all feminists ugly? Yes, they are!

Here’s the rub with the NAACP and their ilk and reality. Blacks don’t get the same benefit of doubt as Mormons because Mormons don’t usually commit crimes in large numbers. If blacks want to be given the same respect as other groups when it comes to suspicions, they must earn it. Instead of whining against the logic and reason for blacks being viewed suspiciously by society (even Jesse Jackson), they should criticize the sizable criminal element in their community that causes the suspicion. Their self-serving whining goes against the logic of self-preservation. Political correctness is an insult to logic and reason. PC is the converse of intelligence.

[...]

If blacks are viewed negatively by society, it is because their actions have taught society to fear them. When black youth begin escorting old ladies across the road instead of shooting them and stealing their purses, Americans will stop profiling them as criminals. When blacks act like a pair of Mormon missionaries, they will be afforded the same treatment. People might still avoid them as they do Mormon missionaries but it won’t because they’re worried about being the victim of crime.

No one is forcing blacks to commit violent crimes. Some like the NAACP, MSNBC and Democrats support the violence committed by blacks by consistently making excuses for it. AWD has asked this question numerous times over the years and no leftist has yet to answer: Wouldn’t the black community and America be much better off if black males, who make up 3% of the population, would commit only 3% of murders and violent crimes and not 51%? If one utilizes logic and reason to answer instead of political correctness, the answers are quite simple.

Black America would be much better off listening to reasonable black voices who call for responsibility and civil behavior from their community instead of the race-baiters who make their living off of crying racism. There is a great many blacks who have broken the chains of ignorance in their community and live peaceful, productive lives away from the nightmare that occurs daily in America’s black ghettos.

Michael Savage #fundie rightwingwatch.org

Yesterday on “The Savage Nation,” right-wing radio host Michael Savage was outraged about a school program in the Italian city of Trieste called the “Game of Respect,” which is meant to break down gender stereotypes.

Somehow, Savage managed to link the program to ISIS.

“The perverts have taken over every aspect of every Western culture, which, by the way, is why ISIS is rising around the world,” Savage said. “Make no mistake about it, ISIS is a counterpoint to these psychotics. You don’t understand that, I do. I have a global perspective, I have a mystical perspective, I have a godly perspective and I am telling you there is a reason ISIS is making gains, it’s because of the vermin who have penetrated our culture and destroyed it from within.”

Michael Savage: Western 'Perverts' To Blame For ISIS; 'Obama Is The Devil'
SUBMITTED BY Brian Tashman on Thursday, 6/18/2015 3:40 pm
Yesterday on “The Savage Nation,” right-wing radio host Michael Savage was outraged about a school program in the Italian city of Trieste called the “Game of Respect,” which is meant to break down gender stereotypes.

Somehow, Savage managed to link the program to ISIS.

“The perverts have taken over every aspect of every Western culture, which, by the way, is why ISIS is rising around the world,” Savage said. “Make no mistake about it, ISIS is a counterpoint to these psychotics. You don’t understand that, I do. I have a global perspective, I have a mystical perspective, I have a godly perspective and I am telling you there is a reason ISIS is making gains, it’s because of the vermin who have penetrated our culture and destroyed it from within.”

Savage claimed that the “cultural and societal degradation” is also the fault of President Obama, whom he said is “dumping so many Muslims in all-white Christian communities” in order to “bust up the Christian communities.”

“The man is the Devil,” Savage continued. “Obama and his minions are the Devil themselves. They are not out to remake America but to destroy America. I stand by those words, I will not back down and someone on the Republican ticket has to stand up and show a pair of you-know-what and say something about this cultural degradation.”

The only Republican politician taking such a brave stance, he added, is Donald Trump.

500 Mom Strong, Anna Bohach #fundie #transphobia lifesitenews.com

‘500 Mom Strong’ group leads rally against Drag Queen Story Hour

SPOKANE, Washington, June 19, 2019 (LifeSiteNews) ― A group of mothers and their allies have taken to the streets to show their opposition to Drag Queen Story Hour.

500 Mom Strong and its male allies rallied outside the Spokane South Hill Public Library on Saturday, June 15. The afternoon event, which attracted more than 200 supporters, took place on the opposite side of the street from the library. It featured several church groups, music, police, snipers, and the arrest of a Christian pastor.

Pastor Afhsin Yaghtin of New Covenant Baptist Church argued with police about having to remain at a distance from the library. Hundreds of supporters of Drag Queen Story Hour (DQSH) held a counter-rally beside the public facility.

The protest was filmed by Alex Barron of the traditionalist Catholic Charles Carroll Society.

500 Mom Strong is a group founded over Facebook by Anna Bohach, a woman who believes that library drag queen events are both misogynist and attempts to sexualize children.

Bohach began the group when she discovered that the Spokane South Hill Branch Library was going to host a “Drag Queen Story Hour” on June 15. An official advertisement for the event promised “a special sparkly edition of storytime.”

“We will share stories of identity and inclusion and celebrate creativity with a craft," the ad continued.

In an early post describing the new group, Bohach explained why she finds drag queens so offensive.

“500 Mom Strong is a group of women who have had enough with the sexualization of our children and the mockery of our femininity,” she wrote.

“The Spokane Public Library South Hill has decided to host a ‘Drag Queen Story Hour’ on June 15th, at 2pm. This is misogyny; drag queens are very offensive to women. They are grotesque hypersexualized caricatures of women. They mock women and debase our womanhood and femininity. A drag queen is no different than a racist donning black face,” she continued.

“The library hosting such an event teaches our sons that women are just sexual objects and it teaches our daughters that they must be overly sexualized to be desired. Enough is enough. We say NO more to a political agenda aimed at degrading women and sexualizing children. We say no to gender appropriation!”

Soon after 500 Mom Strong went live on Facebook, it was inundated with misogynist and sexually explicit abuse from drag queens and their supporters.

Bohach told LifeSiteNews by phone that the abuse has continued.

“We’re getting death threats daily,” she said. “They threatened to rape my husband.”

Bohach, who has four children, has been married for 13 years. She told LifeSiteNews that she had always told herself that she would do something if Drag Queen Story Hour came to Spokane. The call for action arrived when her mother phoned her with the news of the Spokane library hour.

“I think it came from God,” Bohach said. “It came into my head that I and a bunch of moms should do something about it.”

Their objections to Drag Queen Story Hour would be voiced as women uncomfortable with the stereotypes of femininity paraded by drag culture.

After Bohach founded 500 Mom Strong, the Spokane library asked her to be part of a panel discussion about Drag Queen Story Hour. When Bohach discovered the discussion was going to be on the same day as a Pride parade, she worried about being identified and harassed on the way to the library.

When the library agreed to a different date, Bohach discovered that everyone else on the panel was a drag queen supporter and she would not be allowed to bring people who shared her point of view. She decided not to go and was later told that the panel used the occasion to tell every concerned Christian woman in the audience that she was a bigot. A male professor gave them a lecture on men dressing as women.

“It was a man sitting there telling women that we’re not allowed to be offended by drag,” Bohach said, her voice cracking.

The heavy police presence, including “snipers on the roof,” was there, Bohach believes, because of false accusations from a rival Facebook group, called 500 Drag Queen Strong, that she had made death threats against them.

“It’s outrageous and a total lie,” she told LifeSiteNews.

Undeterred, the strong mom is hoping that other mothers will be inspired by her fight against the misogyny of drag queens and Drag Queen Story Hour.

“My goal is 500 moms,” she told LifeSiteNews. “I want to have 500 moms in each state who work together to stop it in their state.”

This is not an impossible dream: Bohach is already in demand.

“I’ve been getting calls from all over the country from people who want my help,” she said.

“From Texas, from Ohio, from California.”

One of the factors inspiring the women to join Bohach’s movement is their discomfort with men aping female dress and mannerisms.

“All these women (say), ‘Oh my gosh, you’re right: this is misogyny,” she said.

“We’ve finally put a name to it.”

Bohach wrote an account of last Saturday’s rally for Church Militant.

500 Mom Strong will appear at Spokane Public Library’s downtown branch this Saturday, June 22, between 12 and 3 p.m. to protest its Drag Queen Story Hour.

Raymond Kidwell #racist disqus.com

[Commenting on AmRen’s review of “Race Differences in Psychopathic Personality: An Evolutionary Analysis”, a new book by Richard Lynn, the author of “The Bell Curve”]

I think psychopathy is a misnomer. Different races and ethnic groups have different instincts. In many cases its neither good nor bad, sometimes it affects group success or individual success. As an example, many online white nationalists will accuse "Jews" of being psychopaths, other people claim that psychopaths rise to the top of society and control the world. Neither one is accurate.

Ashkenazim tend to be more aggressive than your typical white European. They have chutzpah. They are more likely to aggressively fight for their self interests, both as individuals and as a group. A typical European may find this off putting or perhaps respectable, but its different. Of course individuals within a group vary- not all Jews are stereotypical of their group, and so on with other groups. By contrast I think the average European is too docile. They let themselves get used and abused. This explains the huge difference between Israel and European nations. Israel is a little too aggressive to non-Jews. Europe is far too accommodating.

Similarly you have differences in mating or social behavior. Polygamy and multiple sexual partners seems to be the norm in every black community across the world (other than maybe upper class blacks in a predominately white community). At the same time many white people who have tried "free love" in the hippy movement decided its not for them and they are more interested in having a single partner. Not every person conforms to a stereotype, but generally the instincts and inclinations of different races vary. But to call one group "psychopaths" and another "normal" its not really accurate.

It is true that there is a difference in altruism. European whites tend to be the most altruistic group which makes white communities generally more desirable to live in than others. By Altruism I mean a basic concern for other people, compassion, non-criminality etc.

When I delivered food for a living I saw the clear difference- even in a wealthy neighborhood where everyone has the same wealth and same cultural background there is a gigantic difference in tips. White people tip well. They gladly help others without asking for some immediate gain. There may be individual exceptions but you can clearly see altruistic behavior in a white community. Black people were the lowest- many of them tip very badly to the point where if there are a lot of blacks in the community the business is forced to charge the tip as part of the bill. Jews tend to tip the minimal. They don't want to leave a lousy tip and look bad in front of others, but they also don't want to be too generous- so they'll usually tip whatever is considered normal (like 10% or whatever) but never anything super generous. Indians from India are almost on the same level as blacks, but may care a little bit more of what others think of them. Asians are somewhere between Jews and whites.

All these little "instincts" add up to vastly different societies or communities- and different social institutions. One example: East Asian societies are plagued by authoritarianism. A major reason for this is Asians tend to be very docile and compliant (somewhat ironic that this leads to strong armed governments). In this case I.Q. doesn't account for the vast difference between a typical white community (which is more democratic) and a typical East Asian one (more authoritarian) nearly all the difference relates to instincts. Although you can see if the conditions are right Asians can maintain a democracy but it tends to slide towards authoritarianism if there are no whites to object, because there is not a lot of opposition to power grabbing. Jewish societies are the opposite. Ask two Jews a question and you get three opinions. It would be nearly impossible to maintain authoritarian rule over a predominately Jewish community (at least in the long term wouldn't work). I think "instincts" is a better word than sociopathy. In this case altruistic instinct would more specifically describe what we are observing.

Roberta Laurila #fundie precious-testimonies.com

(=This is one of the pioneers of the Ex Gay movenent, deceased since 2011, and coined the name "Exodus" for Ex Gay Ministry=)

Right from the day of my birth, there was a hint of future problems. When my mother first saw me, she expressed her love for me, then remembered she only had a boy's name chosen. Thus Robert became Roberta.

During childhood, my mother's heart condition and crippling arthritis kept her from doing the usual things with me that my friend's mothers did. I became a loner and a daydreamer. At the age of eight, I was imitating everything my older brother did, from smoking cigarettes to dating girls.

IN LOVE

When I was ten, I "fell in love" for the very first time with my lady school teacher. This crush lasted for three years until our paths separated when I began my freshman year in high school. My heart was grieved until I met a beautiful brunette in my class and new love sprang up in my heart. Of course I couldn't speak of this love to anyone. I began to realize that somehow, I was different. My whole being cried out to love and be loved. Living with my secret longings through those teen years was so difficult.

I tried being like my friends and began dating young men when my father would allow it. When he wouldn't, I became angry and rebellious. I built a bad reputation for myself and as the small town tongues began wagging, I started withdrawing, antagonistic toward all.

ABUSE

My Christian mother was very patient during those years, but my father was under conviction for not accepting the Lord. His cursing raged out of control nearly every night as he verbally abused my mother. These times sent me into a rage. It was during this time in my life that I decided no man would ever treat me like that.

I also rejected my father for getting mom pregnant again. She was in ill health and she hadn't wanted another child. I had also heard many stories of my father's first wife dying at childbirth and that filled me with fears of having children. No way was that for me.

Then at sixteen, my "steady" boyfriend tried to rape me. That event really confirmed to me that sex was filthy and an abomination.

TWO MARRIAGES

After high school, all my girlfriends were getting married. I became fearful of being left out. In desperation, I gave in to my brother's suggestion to meet one of his friends, twelve years older than myself. In less than three months, I married this man whom I didn't even love. After two years, I divorced him and began writing to a man in the Armed Forces who had loved me before my marriage. The decision to marry him came when I learned he would soon be going to Germany in active combat. I could receive an allotment check and wouldn't have to live with him. What a farce! Less than two years later, he came home and I soon divorced him.

Not long after, the Holy Spirit began to convict me of my sin. I had attended tent meetings in a Pentecostal church when I was a child and marched to the front night after night to get saved. But I'd given it all up when I realized I couldn't be good in the days following.

When I began to feel pangs of guilt, this made Satan angry. Soon after, I was introduced to a lesbian who had been in that lifestyle a long time and knew the ropes. She was a bad influence on me and soon I began drinking, which I had never done. The second night, she invited me to spend the night with her. I began meeting other lesbians and partying far too much. Not long after, I was fired from my job.

I soon met a girl who was my "type" and we lived together for eight years. Because of the guilt and drinking, my fits of jealousy and temper became uncontrollable. Then I left my first friend and began living with another. After a year I nearly killed her in the car after drinking too much wine. Needless to say, she left me for good.

SALVATION

I was home alone the afternoon of October 7, 1955. With fear and panic in my heart, I made the decision to take my own life. I was too ashamed to commit myself to an institution to find help for my troubled mind. Pride was still very much alive, even though I thought I was beyond help. I wondered how to call my friend to ask for her forgiveness. I wanted so much to be forgiven, but it seemed out of the question.

I started for the kitchen to turn on the gas jets. I had already had a few drinks to try to give me courage. Just before I entered the kitchen door, I fell to my knees in front a chair. With tears streaming down my face, I cried out, "God forgive me. God forgive me!'

Only later did I realize that I was saved at that moment. The Holy Spirit came to live within me, and began leading me in ways that confirmed my salvation. But in rebellion, I still held onto my old friends.

I had two lesbian relationships after my salvation. "God doesn't expect me to "quit loving women," I reasoned. Of course, I couldn't stop without supernatural help. And I didn't have anyone else to help. This was years before God raised up former homosexuals to begin ministries.

Ten years after I received Jesus Christ as my Savior, I was still living in sin. God began allowing me to feel the consequences of my rebellion. I could not have survived the trauma that followed without the Lord's care and mercy. God allowed the devil to pour out his wrath in such a devastating way. I still shudder at his trickery. With demonic signs and wonders, Satan convinced me that God wanted me to live with another woman while involved in Christian ministry.

The climax came following the suicidal death of a dear friend whom I had betrayed. It was from that shocking emotional experience that my stubborn will was broken. I promised God that I would not let her death be for nothing. Then came the vision.

THE VISION

While living in what seemed to be a hell on earth with my lover, God came to me one night. I was alone and in deep despair, The Lord gave me a spiritual vision of a worldwide ministry. This outreach would reach homosexuals who wanted a close relationship with Jesus Christ and who wanted to be set free from their sin.

As the vision unfolded, I knew God was saying I must leave this lifestyle forever. I was to begin interceding for Him to raise up individuals from the gay lifestyle and others, truly called by Him, to begin specific ministries to homosexuals.

Six years after the vision, God directed me to write my personal testimony of deliverance from lesbianism. My story entitled "Gay Liberation" was published in book form in 1975. It was the first of its kind and not many bookstores would accept it, due to the subject, which was "hush-hush" at the time.

INTERCESSION

Much has happened since that time. While I continued to intercede, God began calling forth former gays to minister. God has blessed my friendships with many of the "pioneers" in the Exodus movement, such as Frank Worthen, Robbi Kenney, Ed Hurst, and others. I have been blessed also to see many ministries begin in foreign soil. What a wonderful God He is!

God has kept me at a low profile. At times, I have rebelled concerning this. But deep down, I know I was called to intercede for others to be led by the Holy Spirit into the entire world.

Even as I write these words, tears are flowing down my cheeks. Surely God will complete His perfect plan to reach the many millions of the lost who have been so rejected and lonely so many years. I weep for the church, blinded by the enemy so it cannot see the need to teach gays. So many Christians cannot truly believe that God can set these people free. My great desire now is to reach those in the gay church. I am believing God to also work a miracle there. Our God reigns!

Aeman Ansari #racist huffingtonpost.ca

Last week The Ryersonian reported on an incident that involved two first-year journalism students who were turned away from an event organized by Racialized Students' Collective because they are white. Since then there has been a lot of commentary on the piece and a lot of debate -- a lot of the criticism is valid.

There are two sides to the story: 1) the media has a right to attend public events and report on matters that are in the public interest. The student media needs to cover initiatives that are happening on campus so that we draw attention to them and in turn create awareness (The Ryersonian reported that one student said he was covering the meeting for an assignment). 2) Marginalized groups have a right to claim spaces in the public realm where they can share stories about the discrimination they have faced without judgment and intrusion from anyone else.

I am a person of colour and a journalist and so there are two conflicting voices inside my head. But in this case one voice, that of a person of colour, is louder and my conscience does not allow me to be impartial. I have to take a side.

The organizers of the event, the Racialized Students' Collective, should have done a better job of labelling this event as a safe space on the Ryerson Students' Union online calendar. They should label safe spaces clearly and maybe even host events that educate the public on what they mean. Doing so will help the public and the media have a better understanding of the purpose and value of these spaces.

However, the point to note is not that two white students were asked to leave the event, but rather that this was a safe space and that we as a newsroom, as a campus and as a society are not as knowledgeable as we should be about what these spaces mean.

It's not just important, but it's essential, for marginalized groups to have safe spaces on campus to engage with people who understand what they go through. Though this group is funded by Ryerson's student union, it works to serve a particular group and a particular purpose. Many students at Ryerson have encountered racism in their life that is impossible to forget and many are exposed to discrimination on a daily basis. This group and these sort of events allow people of colour to lay bare their experiences and to collectively combat this societal ailment. These spaces are rare places in the world not controlled by individuals who have power, who have privilege.

These spaces, which are forums where minority groups are protected from mainstream stereotypes and marginalization, are crucial to resistance of oppression and we, as a school and as a society, need to respect them.

Earlier in the week a newsroom colleague and I went to an ad-hoc committee meeting on sexual assault policy. When we arrived we were told it was a safe space, and that we would not be able to report on anything that would be discussed in the meeting.

We understood the value of these sorts of events, where people can share their common struggles. Our understanding let us attend and contribute to the conversation, even if we couldn't report about it.
We understood the people there had a right to privacy. They had a right to collectively work through the challenges society had imposed on them. They had a right to claim parts of the campus, parts of the world, for a few hours in hopes of creating broader social change.

The two students who tried to enter the RSC meeting said that they were embarrassed when they were asked to leave and that the group was being counterproductive in sectioning themselves off. Similarly, some of the comments on the piece written about these students speaks to the idea that excluding certain people from these events, this dialogue, is encouraging racial tension. Their embarrassment isn't as important as the other issues involved here.

Segregation was imposed on people of colour by people of privilege, not the other way around. The very fact that individuals organizing to help each other get through social barriers and injustices are being attacked and questioned for their peaceful assembly is proof that they were right to exclude those students.

Racialized people experience systemic discrimination on a daily basis, on many levels, and in ways that white people may never encounter. The whole point of these safe spaces is to remove that power dynamic. That's partly what makes them spaces for healing.

The presence of any kind of privilege puts unnecessary pressure on the people of colour to defend any anger or frustrations they have, to fear the outcome of sharing their stories. The attendees are trying to move forward by supporting each other and they should not have to defend themselves, they should not fear the consequences of raising their voices.

Instead of focusing on why those students were asked to leave, we should be thinking about the history of oppression that makes these kinds of groups and these kinds of places so very important. We should be focusing on how to be aware and respectful of the rights of both the press and marginalized groups. We have to find a way to coexist peacefully.

The West has a history of oppressing people of colour: from Africans who were enslaved and brought to the New World, to native people whose land was stolen by Europeans. This kind of oppression is still witnessed today, in the way the black community is treated in the United States, in the state of African nations trying to recover from the collapse of the previous colonial rule, and in the continuing struggles of indigenous peoples.

White people may experience occasional and unacceptable prejudice, but not racism. They do not experience the systemic racism that makes it hard for them to find jobs, housing, health care and justice in the legal system.

Racism is not personal, it is structural. Unlike the arena of mainstream media, the educational system, religious institutions and judicial systems that reinforce hurtful stereotypes, these spaces remind the oppressed that they are human, that they deserve respect.

Chateau Heartiste #sexist heartiste.wordpress.com

Dating Market Value Test For Women

UPDATE:

I’ve adjusted the scoring and categories a bit because the test was skewed somewhat toward lower scores. For those who have arguments with my scoring system, understand that it is based on averages. I’m sure everyone knows a 34 year old woman who is just as hot as the average 22 year old girl, but the exceptions don’t make the rules.

And a note on BMI:
I used the 1959 Met Life height-weight insurance charts as guides as they are the most accurate (before American “grade inflation” made obese the new normal). A 5’10” 140lb woman would have a BMI of 20.1, which puts her well within the most desirable BMI category.

*****

If you are a woman, this test will measure your dating market value. The higher the number, the better quality man you can catch. The lower the number, the more likely you will find yourself surrounded by cats. Unlike the male version of this test, here I have added a sliding scale to some of the questions because this better reflects the outsized importance that certain factors have on a woman’s total sexual value.

Guys, you may take this quiz for your girlfriends or wives to see if you have settled for tepid sex once a week or if you always get hard looking at her and never forget her birthday.

1. How old are you?

15 to 16 years old: +5 points
17 to 20 years old: +10 points
21 to 25 years old: +8 points
26 to 29 years old: +3 point
30 to 33 years old: 0 points
33 to 36 years old: -1 point
37 to 40 years old: -5 points
41 to 45 years old: -8 points
46 to 49 years old: -10 points
over 49: you’ve hit the wall. waysa?

2. How important is makeup to your appearance?

It slightly enhances my looks: 0 points
I look like a different woman with makeup: -1 point
I’m a natural beauty. My morning face looks the same as my evening face: +1 point

3. What is your IQ? (This relates tangentially to your ability to connect emotionally with a man.)

Under 85: -1 point
85 to 100: 0 points
101 to 120: +1 point
121 to 145: 0 points
Over 145: -1 point

*****

The following ten questions deal with the physical attractiveness of your body.

4. Your breast size is:

Bee stings up to A cup: -1 point
B cup: 0 points
C cup: +1 point
D cup, naturally firm: +2 points
DD cup, firm: +1 point
E cup and up: 0 points

5. Your breasts look firm and pert when you wear:

A bra: 0 points
An underwire push-up bra: -1 point
Nothing: +1 point

6. How long are your legs in relation to your height?

Long: +1 point
Average: 0 points
Short: -1 point

7. What is the shape of your ass?

Flat: -1 point
Round and fleshy: +1 point
Round, fleshy, and firm: +2 points
Flat and saggy: -2 points
Just average: 0 points

8. How flat is your stomach?

Cutting board flat: +1 point
Slight pouch: 0 points
Muffin top: -1 point
Flabby beer gut and fupa: -10 points

9. How toned are your upper arms?

Very toned, I can see my triceps: +1 point
Average, not flabby: 0 points
If I hold my arm out, I can wobble the fat underneath my upper arm: -1 point

10. How big are your hands?

Delicate piano fingers, proportionally small: +1 point
Average size: 0 points
Manhands: -1 point

11. Where is there hair on your body?

My head and pubic area only: +1 point
I have to shave my legs daily and wax my bushy eyebrows: 0 points
I have dark forearm hair and a mustache: -1 point
Nipples, asscrack, and that giant mole on my back: -2 points

12. Get a tape ruler and measure around your waist and your hips. Divide your waist number by your hip number. This ratio is:

0.65 to 0.75: +1 point
0.55 to 0.64: 0 points
under 0.55: -1 point
0.76 to 0.85: 0 points
0.85 to 0.95: -1 point
over 0.95: -2 points

13. What is your BMI?

(Go here to calculate your BMI. The scoring of female BMI varies somewhat from that of male BMI because aesthetics, not just general health, have to be taken into consideration.)

under 14.1: -10 points
14.1 to 15.0: -5 points
15.1 to 16.5: 0 points
16.6 to 17.4: +3 points
17.5 to 21.0: +10 points
21.1 to 23.0: +3 points
23.1 to 24.5: 0 points
24.6 to 28.0: -5 points
28.1 to 33.0: -10 points
over 33.0: stop taking this quiz. you get nothing! you lose! good day madam!

*****

The next ten questions are the section of the test that measures your facial beauty. Since so much of a woman’s dating market value resides in the appeal of her face, I have chosen to examine some traits in finer detail. To illustrate how very subtle changes in facial characteristics can mean the difference between beautiful and ugly, look at these two photos:

imageimage

I do not even have to label these photos because almost all my readers viewing them, men and women, will instinctively know which is the hot girl and which is not. Remember this the next time someone tells you beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

14. On a scale of 1 to 10, how pretty are you?

Note: Do not bother soliciting the opinions of the following people, because they will not give you a truthful answer.

Your family.
Your heterosexual female friends.
Your homosexual male friends.
Your heterosexual male friends who would sleep with you given the chance.

Instead, put your pic up on hotornot and check back in a week. Otherwise, go with what you’ve overheard through the grapevine by people who weren’t your close friends, or suck it up and try to be as honest with yourself as possible. Lesbians will also give you an accurate appraisal as long as it is through a third party and not directly to your face. Use the photos above as guidelines. Adjust your rating based on how close your facial morphology matches one or the other.

0: don’t bothering finishing this test.
1 to 2: -10 points
3 to 4: -5 points
5: -1 point
6: +2 points
7: +5 points
8 to 9: +8 points
10: +12 points

15. How clear is your skin?

No acne, blemishes, or poorly located moles: 0 points
Some combination of the above: -1 point
People are always telling you how silky smooth your skin looks: +1 point

16. Do you have any noticeable deformities?

Yes, minor: -1 point
Yes, major: -10 points
No: 0 points

17. How full are your lips?

Pencil thin: -1 point
Average: 0 points
Juicily plump: +1 point
Weirdly oversized: 0 points

18. How high is your forehead?

Low: -1 point
Average: 0 points
High: +1 point

19. How long is your jawline from ear to chin?

Long: -1 point
Average: 0 points
Short: +1 point

20. How big is your chin?

Small: +1 point
Average: 0 points
Large: -1 point

21. How big is your nose?

Small: +1 point
Average: 0 points
Large: -1 point

22. In proportion to the size of your face, are your eyes:

Large and saucer-like: +1 point
Normal-sized: 0 points
Small and beady: -1 point

23. Is the distance between your eyes:

Wide: +1 point
Average: 0 points
Narrow: -1 point

The bottom line on female facial beauty is that as the lower half of her face becomes smaller and more delicate, making her eyes and cheekbones appear more prominent, the better looking she will be.

*****

The final eleven questions measure your femininity, sexiness, and pleasing personality traits. This is the closest to “game” that women have at their disposal. It isn’t much, which is why the scoring is lowest in this section.

24. You frequently wear sexy lingerie, even when not prepping for a hot date.

Yes: +1 point
Special occasions only: 0 points
Never. Ripped and stained comfy granny panties only: -1 point

25. When someone gets hurt you are the first to ask if they are OK and to deliver aid if needed.

Almost always: +1 point
Occasionally: 0 points
Almost never: -1 point

26. You are highly competitive and often play co-ed team sports.

Yes, and I will throw an elbow if necessary. My shelf is filled with trophies: -1 point
I like to exercise on nice days with one on one sports like tennis: +1 point
I’m competitive with other girls, but not guys: 0 points

27. When a guy approaches you in a bar, regardless of your attraction for him, you:

Smile and look at him: +1 point
Pretend like you don’t notice him coming: 0 points
Frown and tell him you’re talking to your friends before he even gets a chance to say Hi: -1 point

28. On a first date the check arrives for dinner and drinks. You:

Offer to split the check or even pay in full: +1 point
Smile and thank the guy when he pays for the check: 0 points
Forget to thank him after he pays for your ungrateful ass: -1 point

29. You are about to have sex with a guy for the first time. He undresses and his penis is small. Do you:

Tell him how great his cock looks and feels?: +1 point
Say nothing: 0 points
Look surprised and stifle a laugh: -1 point

30. You think blowjobs are:

Great! You give them spontaneously and there’s never any doubt how much you enjoy it: +1 point
An obligation: 0 points
Gross. You gave one after your BF proposed and spit it on his shoes: -1 point

31. Do you do anal?

Yes, and it makes me come to know how much it pleases my man: +1 point
Only when I get really drunk: 0 points
Never. It’s an exit only: -1 point

32. The number of sex positions you have tried is:

3 to 10: 0 points
Missionary and doggy style only: -1 point
I’m a contortionist: +1 point

33. How often do you curse?

I think I said damn once: +1 point
I blurt out fuck and shit a few times a week: 0 points
My mouth is a gutter: -1 point

34. You’d best describe your sense of fashion as:

I’m a label whore: -1 point
I hide my body under baggy tees and ill-fitting jeans: -1 point
I wear casual clothing that flatters my figure: 0 points
I wear stylish clothing on weeknights and I can handle heels over 3 inches: +1 point
My flip flops have my foot imprint in them: -2 points

*****

SCORING

There is a minimum of -83 points and a maximum of 64 points to earn based on the questions asked. The reason the minimum score goes lower than the maximum score goes high is because there are a few things, such as gross obesity, old age, or a major facial deformity, that seriously negatively impact a woman’s overall rating to the point of market extinction.

The scoring breaks down as follows:

-83: You are proof that god does not exist, but that satan does.
-82 to -56: You’re an omega. If it makes you feel better you will have your choice of male omegas to bang.
-55 to -40: The majority of men are disgusted by the sight of you. Your kind will suffer most when our sexbot overlords arrive. Losers hit on you constantly figuring they have a chance.
-39 to -20: You were born to cockblock. But you’ll manage to marry a table scrap.
-19 to -5: Lesser beta. The men you want make fun of you out of earshot. You spend many years learning how to settle for mediocre betas.
-4 to 14: Classic beta. Your hot friends always gets hit on first, but if you really tramp it up you can snag a slightly better than average guy to take you home for a single night of commitment.
15 to 29: Greater beta. More than a few attractive guys will approach you. But if your personality is flawed you risk becoming a pump and dump victim.
30 to 43: You are officially a nascent alpha female. A lot of quality guys will hit on you and you will be able to pick and choose at your leisure. But don’t push it. You’re not quite hot enough to string guys along forever.
44 to 55: You’re a bona fide hottie. Nearly every guy who meets you agrees you are a hottie. So does every girl. This puts you in the top 1% of worldwide womanhood. With great power comes great responsibility, so try to limit the number of men you torture with blueballs and LJFB rejections to fewer than 100 in your social circle. As long as you are not a complete bitch, marriage with a top quality man will come easily to you.
56 to 63: Guys want you, girls want to be you. You are just short of perfection, which paradoxically means you will get hit on more than the super alpha females. You are a player’s greatest challenge, and his greatest reward, because unlike the perfect woman there is still something human about you. Sex, love, security, commitment, easy living… you have it all. Only your demons can defeat you.
64: Super Alpha. The world is yours. Life is an endless parade of joy and excitement. Your power is illimitable… for now.

I hope everyone noticed what was missing from this test:

Your job.
The amount of money you make.
Your accomplishments.
Your social status and number of friends.
Your deep and profound worldview.

Unlike the men who took my Male Dating Market Value test, I do not expect *any* women to be completely honest with themselves taking the Female Dating Market Value test. The female ego is simply way too fragile to absorb the shock of such a brutal self-assessment. Therefore, I will be mentally subtracting 10 points from every woman who posts her score here in the comments.

(Submitter's note: Compare and contrast Dating Market Value Test For Men)

Galactic Federation via Galaxygirl #ufo #crackpot #moonbat #magick voyagesoflight.blogspot.com

Greetings, beloveds. We are the Galactic Federation of Light. We speak as one voice tonight, sending you waves and waves of love, of encouragement and good cheer. The eclipse triad monad has activated swiftly that which was needed to activate, and indeed much that was hidden is to be shortly revealed. Your DNA upgrades that are occurring in your now will enable you to further enjoy the experience of being within your form. We see and we feel your exhaustion and we ask that you hold on a little while longer. Even though Nova Gaia is very real and waiting for you, you must create the bridge and pull that reality time stream to you with your thoughts, your intentions to love in every moment and you willingness to shine your glorious light.

We are the Galactic Federation of Light. You are an essential part of the plan, you are key players in this gaming experience. Your importance cannot be diminished. Allow no one to diminish your light. Restless souls and wandering ones are seeking escape from the light. It is likely you will continue to need to usher them to Alcyone or to your favorite Archangel or Ascended Dragon teammate. Do not be alarmed as the dark ones seek you out for vengeance or relief. They are suffering. The light heals all wounds. Such atrocities are no longer to be tolerated and violation of the free will of the humans shall no longer be allowed. The light has won. We are assuring you this is so. The dark ones know this and it should not come as a surprise to you, seasoned warriors, that they will continue to try to bring you down. They are not able to meet together as they once did frequently to plan and scheme the further demise of humanity. They are cut off, separated, drowning in their own fear, we do not say guilt for we are unclear if they have guilt at this point, for one must have a certain amount of personal awareness to process guilt and that is part of the healing work. Nonetheless, the light has them surrounded on all sides. Do not fear the virus. The virus feeds on fear, on the lower vibrational. Send the virus love. Send it light and transform it. Those that choose to leave the earth sphere simulation shall do so and the virus opportunity affords them this. Do not be afraid. Self care is in order, is the order of the day. We wish for our light workers to feel our support, our healing. Please remember to invite our healing teams into your homes to surround your bodies while they sleep with healing modalities of light and love. Extend this wish into your communities. You may not realize and so we do tell you that the vibratory codex of a healed light worker is felt around the globe. And so when you are healed you heal many by smoothing the vibratory codex of the human collective.

godoftruelove #sexist reddit.com

This society benefits only those willing to use others. Even if you where to escape inceldom, you would be faced with a whole new slew of problems.
Something that pained me again for the first time in 8 years, is the events of losing a girl who was beyond her gender, free of the greedy thinking that I've seen in stacy types.

Talking to her was one of the best things I ever experienced in life, I was able to connect to her in a way that I hadn't with other girls before her(and if you read my previous posts, I make friends with girls, I don't go out). Unlike the asian girl who although I recognized as having integrity unlike any girl I saw before her, this girl was very whimsical, with no concern for vanity that enslaved other women.
It all came to an end when a chad/normie interfered, as well as this very angry female type, the kind of that gets triggered and shuts you down without allowing you a rebuttal.

Despite the fact that at the time, I was still a truly pure guy who never saw porn and had never fapped, I was called various names, like potential ra##st, mysoginist, and other stuff(I'm sure by now you are familiar with their talk patterns, as I see you guys posting comments from those extreme groups, and it's part of the reason why these old memories from 8 years ago go dredged up).
They managed to convince her to stop talking to me, despite the fact that all we did was talk about our dreams, ideas, politics, our hobbies, talents, and other nice things. They instead judged me, and hated me, and I can't remember what happened, I think she sent me a message saying we can't talk anymore.
The only thing I remember is that I cried, hard. It was a pain different from losing somebody to death, a different kind of sad emotion. I don't think I ever cried for a girl before or after.

Years later, I decided to check on her, she had a boyfriend, and had slept in the same bed with him. When I read that, I told myself never to check on her again, since she is taken and it's none of my business anymore.
Now years later, after reading here on Incels for a few weeks, I decided to do the unthinkable and checked on her.
Turns out the guy who she got into a relationship with cheated on her, despite the fact that she is a girl that would never cheat, and not even be affected by chad types. To this day, she is still single. She gave herself to this POS, and he threw it in her face. Truly, she deserved a guy with her level of integrity, not some normie piece of shit that cheats just like many other guys have no problem doing.
If those two hadn't interfered with their bad advice, she could have avoided such a guy.
And here I am, as always, still a virgin, and still with my integrity.

Stacies have no problem being cheated on, because they cheat as well. Chads and normies win because all they want is sex, and they will use whatever means to get it, even lying and deception.
And I can't ever be with her now, since she already gave herself to that guy. Well, it was already over anyway, since it's been nearly a decade, I am too old to start anything. It was then and there that anything could have been started, while my youth was still present.
I am essentially was a "Chad" with integrity. That means unlike other Chads that where just in it to have sex and have multiple partners, I was out truly looking to make a girl happy. I was aware of Stacies and Femoids, but I did know and believe in the girl type that wasn't like them.

In this day and age, they are now essentially extinct. And the last generation of them still existed back in that time, some are now married or husks who where tricked by men for sex, and have sworn off relationships because of it, instead of turning into sex zombies like Stacies and feminist femoids.
I would only experience "good social" stuff if I act according to my looks and be as shallow and social as possible, just using women as objects and getting shitfaced drunk. Only then will I be giving social acceptance, but at the cost of my soul and integrity. I would rather die than become a mindless, sex hungry "Chad". I will remain the undying virgin and the God of True Love.

CarlosWongAlmonds #racist reddit.com

Someone help me hide my disgust for whites/Chans/Lus please, shit's hurting my career lol.Identity

I've been blessed with an uncannily high degree of social awareness, in that I 'figure out' people extremely, extremely quickly. Which means that I can figure out within seconds whether

a white is racist (95% of the time, yes), and

an Asian person is a Lu/Chan.

However, pretending to like people tires me out very quickly. I make it very obvious when I dislike someone because to do otherwise is very mentally draining for me. I have incredible social skills knowledge (I know what to say/do 99% of the time to make people love me, so I'm excellent in interviews - I've never not been hired after an interview - because interviews are an hour at max), but pretending to like people that I dislike/don't care about tires me out very, very quickly. (aka despite my extremely slutty ways I'm very traditionally introverted in that as much as I enjoy people spending time with people tires me out as opposed to energizing me)

I'm in a career where racist whites and Chan/Lus unfortunately make up a significant proportion of those in leadership positions. I've heard through the grapevine that a large proportion of these Chan/Lus and racist whites outright hate me, even if I've barely spoken to them.

I've surmised that this is 50% because I'm Asian and I'm don't grovel (nothing I can do to change that), but also 50% because I figure them out as a racist white or a Chan/Lus very quickly and I give off microexpressions that I just can't be bothered to deal with them.

One anecdote I can remember is that during a work function, a girl joined the conversation I was having, and I quickly figured out that she was Lu as fuckkkk from the disproportionate attention she paid to the whites in the conversation (of course I later found out that she had a white boyfriend - duh). Looking back, I realized that I then unconsciously closed her out of the conversation and dragged everyone away from her while totally ignoring her. I didn't do this consciously, but it was just a natural reaction of me not wanting to interact with someone I didn't find worthy.

So anyway, this shit is obviously hurting my career. In a club or social setting I don't really care who I piss off, but this is honestly a high-paying, prestigious career and I'm going to have to deal with this (aka avoid having people hate me). I'm ok with Chan/Lus/whites not particularly liking me or caring about me in the office, but having them hate me is an active detriment to my career.

(Yes, I'm setting up side hustles so that eventually I'll never have to work for anyone, but that takes time).

I don't even know how to approach this mentally. How do I pretend to be nice to racist whites/Chan/Lus while not totally mentally draining myself out during the day? Hopefully someone's been in the same situation as me and they have some relevant words of support to offer.

Thanks for reading this wall of text!

SnowBird95 #fundie boards.msn.com

Barrenness is a punishment from God, like childbirth pain is. ( For anyone that doesn't beleive me, go study the Torah, it is in there. Jesus never changed this punishment, like he never changed child birth pain and it still applies). No woman has a right to go over God's head on this subject. Barren women are not supposed to raise children. The adoption system in the United States abuses and punishes innocent babies and uses and does not forgive single mothers while treating and spoiling women who God has punished like queens. The reason for this is typical American. Money. Closed adoption records, sealed birth records and denying us our God given right to see our real parents names on our birth certificates is abuse in it's highest form. Millions of people agree with me. Here are some signatures from the Abolish Adoption Petition:

www.abolishadoption.com

Btw, this BOARD IS A SUPPORT BOARD FOR ADOPTEES LIKE ME AND BIRTH MOTHERS. ALL TROLLS WILL BE REPORTED FOR ABUSE.

Gianna Giavelli #fundie infowars.com

The New Face of Tyranny: Testosterone Abuse?

Struck by the odd similarities in Janet Napolitano’s, Elena Kagan’s, and Janet Reno’s faces? Countless lesbian women take testosterone not to change gender but as a strength and clitoris enhancer, to increase their sex drives, and to feel more powerful. The truth is testosterone abuse is rife in the lesbian community as much as steroids are everywhere in sports. Some lesbians who take testosterone desire and seek full gender transition and in this case they are called F2Ms (female to males). For others elevated testosterone levels are simply a endocrine disorder that has effected them since birth. Testosterone abuse is so common in the lesbian community there are scenes of shoot up parties much like cocaine parties. Many declare themselves simply “butch” not having a gender issue and this is accepted and even encouraged as the butch dynamic is seen as seizing power from males by becoming male-esq.

Mack Major #fundie mackmajorbooks.com

Every now and then I try to give some solid sound advice to the women who follow me online. Although I can be considered somewhat controversial at times, I'm always honest and truthful with what I write. And what you're about to read will not be any different. With that being said:

LADIES, be careful when your guy only wants to spend time with the fellas but never with you! Something's wrong with that picture. I'm not saying a guy should want to spend all his free time with his woman. That would be abnormal too.

Sometimes you need time away from each other just to decompress and enjoy your own self doing the things you were already interested in doing before you got with the one you're with. Besides, if you're under each other too much you'll eventually start getting on each others last nerve. A little well-timed strategic space will water the garden of any relationship and keep it fertile.

What I'm referring to in this article is the guy who has to always hang out with his 'boys' but rarely makes time to hang with his woman. That's not normal, and something is definitely amiss.

Why would I want to hang with a bunch of dudes all day and night when I have a soft pretty woman at home waiting on me?

In light of the confusion in gender and sexuality that we currently live in, I would ask you to carefully consider: are you sure those are your man's homies, and not his homos? Particularly if they like hanging out at the gym to work out all the time!

"Going to the gym" is one of the oldest excuses (and lies) used by bisexual and gay men to meet up with other males to do the nasty with. It provides a convenient excuse for why he comes home all sweaty, nasty, out of breath and needing a shower.

Her: 'Where are you going?"

Him: 'Me and the guys are going to "work out" at the gym.'

Her: 'Again? You just worked out a few days ago?'

Him: 'You know how it is. We worked on our "back muscles" that day. Today we're going to work on our "glutes".'

Her: (totally oblivious to the coded language being used here): 'Oh okay. Have fun.'

Him: (under his breath): 'Oh, we will.'

There is a lot of undercover faggotry taking place in the land today. So you need to be aware of the signs. And yes, this does swing both directions. Many woman are also using the 'going to work out' with the home-girls excuse to carry on their lesbian abominations. You might think that's her best friend from college. Unbeknownst to you that's been her best lover since college! And you're just as dumb and oblivious as a rat picking cheese out of a mouse trap.

This doesn't mean to start suspecting your guy of cheating every time he makes a run to the store. Let's not get crazy here. In all things let wisdom prevail. It's simply to make you aware that some guys enjoy batting from the back of the cage—if you get my drift. In this day and time, your job is to make sure your man isn't one of them.

Check out his friends. Do any of them appear to be a bit questionable in their sexuality? Have you ever detected a subtle tinge of sweetness in any of his so-called homies? Are they married or in relationships with women? Or are they perpetually single guys living the single life?

No matter what others may tell you: birds of the same feather flock together. Men in committed relationships should be tight with guys equally the same. And when you're in a committed relationship you don't spend the bulk of your free time with your friends. You spend it with your mate.

** This is just a tidbit of advice that you'll find in my ebook written just for women. It's titled SAVED [sexy] & STILL SINGLE: Why Christian Women Can't Get Married Even Though They Love God. Whether you're single hoping to get married or already married: you need to read this ebook. It's the best kept secret in the book world; and when it hits the mainstream it's gonna hit big. But you can get it today and be one of the first to read it before the mainstream gets its hands on it. In fact, I'll do something special. This is typically a $19 ebook: but you can download it today for just $10. This is a limited time offer because I want you to get this ebook and start reading it. Most of all, be sure to tell a friend about it so they can get a copy too. Just hit the button below.

Bill Muehlenberg #fundie billmuehlenberg.com

Indeed, another secular author, Nicholas Kristof, puts it this way: gMoreover, for all the slaughters in the name of religion over the centuries, there is another side of the ledger. Every time I travel in the poorest parts of Africa, I see missionary hospitals that are the only source of assistance to desperate people. God may not help amputees sprout new limbs, but churches do galvanize their members to support soup kitchens, homeless shelters and clinics that otherwise would not exist. Religious constituencies have pushed for more action on AIDS, malaria, sex trafficking and Darfurfs genocide, and believers often give large proportions of their incomes to charities that are a lifeline to the neediest.h

I am not aware of any hospitals or charitable works set up by atheists. And never mind that many noted philosophers have pointed out that it was the Christian emphasis on reason that gave rise to modern science.

The work of Christ reconciling mankind to himself is the source. If you cut off the redemptive work of Christ on the cross, you cut off the very basis for love, forgiveness, peace and reonciliation. If you deny the supernatural, in other words, as Singer wants to do, you will simply not achieve the peace on earth bit.

But for billions of human beings, non-material things like truth, beauty, justice, love, and even God are very meaningful realities, which the narrow world of atheism will never fully enjoy nor understand.

Miriamthebat #homophobia antiyaoi.livejournal.com

Are Yaoi-Haters homophobic?
This isn't flame bait; it's an essay.

I've been adamantly anti-yaoi for a long time now. When I started off getting into various fandoms, I honestly didn't care much about the yaoi aspects and just ignored or went along with it. But over time for various reasons, I grew to dislike it, and eventually became flat-out disgusted by it.

And it bothers me, because as much as I hate yaoi, I am very much supportive of gay rights. I have many gay friends who I care about, and I believe that they deserve the equal rights in marriage, adoption, and everything else as much as any straight couple gets. Yet the idea of two men having a sexual relationship, even just KISSING, makes my stomach churn.

The hell is wrong with me? I'm a straight female and an atheist with no moral influences against it. And it's only yaoi too; I'm utterly neutral to yuri and lesbian relationships. It doesn't disgust me, but it doesn't turn me on either.

It makes me wonder about something that worries me. If I support gay rights but am disgusted by the idea of gay relationships, am I actually homophobic and thus a hypocrite?

Right now I'm active in an online role play community (based on Final Fantasy VII) where the majority of the members are gay. Not that there's anything wrong with that... but it often becomes frustrating. I love the community, but as one who hates Yaoi, when stuff I don't like appears before me I have to pretty much look the other way or grit my teeth and bare it. Every once in a while someone sends me a picture or a RP log that makes me want to puke a little. I really wish I could say "You know, I really don't wait to see this..." but I'm afraid of the backlash and accusations I'll get.

One of the leaders of the community is a gay man who is extremely sexist against women. He likes to talk trash about them behind their backs and exclude them from things. I'm one of the people subject to this, and every time he does an assholeish thing to me, everyone tells me that it's not because of something I did, it's because I'm female. He acts the same way towards the lesbians in the community, too. Everyone in the community allows it and no one really considers it a bad thing, just this guy's "quirk".

Really, prejudice against women by gay men being accepted by a community that preaches equality wasn't something I ever imagined before. I guess there are all kinds of people in this world.

The gay rights movement is a strange thing. Even though the main drive is love, equality, and peace, there's this hidden aspect of counter-bigotry that sometimes shows up. I think it's most obvious through all the hatred put out by rabid yaoi fans over shallow things like anime pairings and smutty drawings, but there's more to it than that. When a group of persecuted individuals gets big enough, they become quick to defend themselves by attacking back.

I'm trying to be very careful about what I say here because I don't want people to get the wrong idea. It's like walking on eggshells, really. I can't really understand my reason for being disgusted by yaoi, because I'm a woman and I'm non-religious. When you consider a straight man who's uncomfortable around a gay man, what pops into your head? You usually think of the straight man as being a closed-minded, dangerous homophobic religious bigot, or some kind of goofball flailing around comically while trying to affirm his masculinity. When you think of a straight woman uncomfortable around a gay man, you usually think of a homophobic religious mother worried that the gay man will touch her children or spread teh ghey to them. Oh, and gay men and lesbians just have a fabulous time with each other with no problems whatsoever.

But those are all stereotypes and real life does not work that way.

Bethany Blankley #fundie charismanews.com

By destroying the institution of marriage, the "gay rights" LBGQTI movement made possible the extension of similar "legal rights" for other "lifestyle choices," including zoophilia, consanguinamorous relationships, necrophilia, pedophilia, polygamy, and every other "fluid" sexual preference or identification—including sologamy and trans-polyamorous relationships.

Efforts to normalize sex with animals as an accepted lifestyle choice resulted in one documentary winning an award this year that idolizes a sexual relationship between a man and his bottlenose dolphin lover.

The 40-year movement to legalize sexual interaction with children is working. People are publicly advocating without shame: "I'm a pedophile, but not a monster;" and, "pedophilia is natural and normal for males."

Now, incest activists in the consanguinamorous community argue it's their turn to have their sexual preference and lifestyle choice validated socially and legally.

Because of a case in New Mexico that's making national headlines, incest activists argue exactly what homosexuals argued to normalize incest.

"I was born this way."

"I can't choose who I love."

"I have a right to be happy just like everyone else."

"We aren't hurting anyone."

"Who is the government to legislate love?"

Incest activists maintain that all sexual preferences and acts should be legal if they are consensual and don't harm anyone. More importantly, the government should not be legislating love.

Christina Shy, an incest activist who runs an advocacy and support website for consanguinamorous people, and is in a relationship with her half-brother, argues that incest "needs to be brought to the attention of everybody in the country and people need to start thinking differently. It was the same with gay people just a few years ago and now they can get married they are accepted. Well why not consanguinamorous people like us? We are all adults. We are not pedophiles, there's no domestic issue. We are in love, we want to be together, but we are related. That shouldn't be a deciding factor."

She's right—if sex is consensual among adults in the privacy of their own home—how is it wrong or even illegal?

How is consensual sex between two adult men different than consensual sex between adult brothers and sisters or adult mothers and sons? If two adult men can legally marry each other, why can't consensual adult incestuous couples?

Why should one consensual relationship be denied and another legal?

Incestuous adults aren't coercing anyone. They are knowingly making choices about their own bodies, so why does anyone have a problem with it? It's really none of anyone else's business.

If transgender people in America, who represent less than half of one percent of the population, can have the government dictate bathroom policies for non-transgender people in public schools and stores, why won't the government legalize consanguinamorous relationships?

Homosexuals, who represent less than 3 percent of the population in America, can legally marry and adopt children, why can't incestuous, polygamists, pedophiles and zoophiles?

If morality and laws are determined by personal preferences (that are fluid and always changing) to justify societal norms, why is a different standard being used to legislate incest, necrophilia or pedophilia than that of same-sex relationships?

Incestuous relationships are mutually consensual, therefore they should be legal. (The same reasoning can be applied to murder. Surely, if two people agree to murder someone, in fact a group of people consent to murder another group of people, their consent justifies their action, which should therefore legalize murder.)

The same goes for polygamy. And necrophilia.

Why is having sex with dead people wrong? The corpse doesn't care. It's dead. It doesn't hurt the corpse; it doesn't even know what's happening. Granted, it can't consent to the sexual act, but that doesn't matter because there are enough necrophiliacs to argue that their sexual preference is normal.

When it comes to not hurting anyone, incest activists argue that abortion is legal, so again, what standard is being used to legislate harm to another person?

They are right. If a baby has no constitutional rights, and adults do, why can't the adults, who aren't harming anyone else, be together?

Practicing homosexuality used to be illegal. Now gays can marry. Times have changed, so who has the audacity to suggest that incest is not the new normal of the 21st century family? Or bestiality?

"Non-human animals have incestuous relationships and multiple partners," some activists argue. Likewise, it's well-known that kings and queens had incestuous relationships for centuries to 'keep their bloodline pure.'

So, who is the government to legislate love? Everyone has the right to love whomever they choose. All love is equal. How is heterosexual love better than incestuous love or being in love with multiple partners?

As the defendant in the New Mexico case argues, as to why he should be allowed to love, have sex with and even marry his mother, he says: "This is about whether I have the right to love someone. And I sure (expletive) have the right to love Monica. You can't tell people who to love or who not to love."

His mother's name, Monica, could easily be "Matthew," the name of a brother, father, uncle or homosexual boyfriend.

No love is wrong.

Gay rights activists and corrupt politicians who chose to legalize same-sex marriage and transgender bathroom policies, have no justification to prevent the legalization other sexual behavior.

Michael ChristisKing #fundie books.google.com

The Award
After the report of the captains and the wicked counsels of the twelve counselors. I saw Lucifer stand up on a platform and this is what He said, "we have three awards to give to those who have done more to make our kingdom come and our will done on earth as it is in hell. Our top prize goes to the spirit of slumber. This is the spirit that has distracted much of the army of the Holy One and put many of them to sleep. The only reason why we rule over many lives and regions today is because of the work of this Agent and his legions." I watched as the spirit of slumber and distraction walked up towards the platform where Lucifer stood. As he walked, everyone in the whole assembly went to sleep and did not wake up until he collected his award and returned to his seat. They went to sleep with their eyes wide open; they were active and still moving, but asleep. This is the same spirit that works to immobilize the leaders of nations bringing them into a drunken stupor and creating moral incapacitation, especially when critical decisions need to be made. This spirit holds leaders long enough in disorientation to effect changes and to turn the course of a nation to darkness irrevocably. They are also responsible for planting wicked counselors that influence kings towards evil. The award looked like a golden cup laced with shining stones of all colors and shapes. This cup was for divination. Along with increased authority in Satan's kingdom, he was also given a scepter.
Following him was the second prize given to a serpent-like spirit who was awarded for seducing leaders. He came on his belly as a serpent of many bright and beautiful colors to receive this award. When he arrived at the platform he took the shape of a beautiful woman; she was completely spotless, pleasant, beautiful and charming to look at. The whole assembly was hypnotized just by looking at her but the spell she cast was broken when she turned back into a serpent to crawl back to her position. She was given a silver cup laced with precious stones.
The third winner was also in the form of a lady; she is the spirit of mammon. She is the harlot of Babylon who prostitutes herself for the silver and gold of the nations. She wields tremendous authority among the nations of the earth. She uses silver and gold to cause nations, individuals and institutions to bow and worship at the throne of Lucifer. She sets nations up to depend on her by showing extravagant generosity beyond words, especially in their times of distress. Once nations, institutions or individuals come to enjoy the fruits of her "kindness", they then begin to depend on her. After showing all forms of "kindness" to her new guest, she then quietly waits for the honeymoon of their newly-found relationship to be over. Once this time of flatten* has fully-bloomed and she has come to know that her new guest is depending on her. she then brings out the shackles. Very few escape her maximum security cage. She guts life out of her captives and leaves them as zombies in her hard labor prison camps. Kings and Queens of the earth worship her. Many have pledged their very souls to her. She is single-handedly responsible for many who are called to preach the gospel not answering their call. Although she was given the third place award, she has caused the greatest number of people to become and remain loyal servants of Satan; bound to him and his slavish systems. She is the deal-maker for Satan. She buys nations, individuals, institutions and territories in times of their economic hardness and life turbulences. She gives them deals they cannot refuse when they need it most. Not many turn down her deals; those who do. suffer tremendous consequences. She brings to mind the statement of Satan to God in Job 2:4. "Skin for skin! Yes. all that a man has he will give for his life." Coming to collect her award, she was decked out with very expensive jewels and precious stones. She was coming drunk looking very much like a Mardi-Gras character. She was drinking from her trademark gold cup and she was drinking her trade drink; the blood of the saints. The most shocking thing was that the crowd loved her and thought she was funny and very entertaining in her costume. They loved her because she brings results and whatever she does morally or in her private life is no big deal to anyone. "She helps the economically troubled, she feeds the hungry, she intervenes when we have natural disasters, she is very effective in what she does, and she is the most caring and most sympathetic person ever". Satan praised her as the kings of earth agreed loudly. She received another shiny necklace made of gold and decorated with all kinds of precious stones, as well as a brand new gold cup.
At His closing remarks the spirit of prophecy came upon Lucifer, the chief deceiver who deceives the world. He prophesied almost as if he was under the control of another. He lifted up his voice and said.
"Let it be clear to everyone here today and let no one be deceived. Though we make war against the Lord God Almighty and against His Christ and Against His Holy Ones, we will not win. Never mistake the silence of the Almighty to be foolishness or weakness. A great storm is coming. It is not a water storm it is going to be a firestorm. It is going to be like no other. It is the army of the purified ones marching to the Command of the Holy One. God is not a man that He should lie. His Word is true; always. None of our efforts will stop them. They are planted on the eternal rock and the shout of the Lord God Almighty is among them.
The saints are the firestorm and the day of their rising will bring a horrible judgment. It will be a day of darkness and gloom, a day of thick clouds and deep blackness. Suddenly, like dawn spreading across the mountains, this great and might\' army will appear. Nothing like it has been seen before or will ever be seen again. Fire burns in front of them, and flames follow after them. Ahead of them the land lies as beautiful as the Garden of Eden. Behind them is nothing but desolation; not one thing escapes. They look like horses; they charge forward like warhorses. Look at them as they leap along the mountaintops. Listen to the noise they make—like the rumbling of chariots, like the roar of fire sweeping across a field of stubble, or like a mighty army moving into battle. Fear grips all the people; every face grows pale with terror. The attackers march like warriors and scale city walls like soldiers.
They march straight forward never breaking rank. They never jostle each other; each moves in exactly the right position. They break through defenses without missing a step. They swarm over the city and run along its walls. They enter all the houses climbing like thieves through the windows. The earth quakes as they advance, and the heavens tremble. The sun and moon grow dark and the stars no longer shine. The Lord is at the head of the column. He leads them with a shout. This is His mighty army and they follow His orders. The day of the Lord is an awesome, terrible thing. Who can possibly survive?"
Snapping out of his trance Lucifer closed his humiliating speech by shouting "BUT, WE MUST FIGHT NOW THAT IT IS DARK AND A GREATER PART OF THE SAINTS ARE SLEEPING BECAUSE THE LIGHT IS COMING WHEN WE CAN NEITHER FIGHT NOR WORK".
I wondered how these Kings of the earth who have given their kingdoms to Satan and other subjects of Satan can still remain loyal to him after such a clear speech that spells their end. Wisdom replied to me and said. "They only hear and understand what Satan wants them to hear and understand. Besides this, many of them for the lust of power and wealth have sold their souls to Satan and cursed the Lord God Almighty and His Righteous Spirit. They cannot turn back now. Yet many of the kings of the earth can still be redeemed. But the cost of reaching them is very high, because they are constantly guarded. The turning of one can quickly mean the turning of many."

JDG #fundie dalrock.wordpress.com

35 (+1) Steps to Be a Woman of Character

1) Do the house work (all of it) unless your husband says otherwise.

2) Find mature Christian women whom are submitted to their husbands for ‘emotional’ support. Men are not women, so don’t expect them to relate to you as women.

3) Question cultural products produced by women. Are these women promoting misandry or other destructive ideas? Read your Bible and seek wise council if unsure.

4) Realize that you are not the center of the universe and a man will need time to himself. Don’t interrupt, don’t start trouble and don’t nag.

5) Realize that you, as a woman, are not the authority on what is sexist and what is not. Read your Bible.

6) Realize that sexism, as it is understood in the mainstream of society today, is not necessarily a bad thing. If a man tells you something is sexist, see if the Bible agrees with him. If a woman tells you something is sexist, see if the Bible agrees with her.

7) Don’t have sex until you are married. If you already have, then STOP. A woman of character does not fornicate. There is no need to have clear unambiguous communication regarding sexual relationships if you are not a whore.

8) Contraception? Consider the aspirin method. See number 7.

9) The HPV vaccine should have no place in biblical patriarchy for a woman of character. See number 7.

10) Have nothing to do with progressive name politics. If you don’t want your husband’s name, then don’t get married.

11) Don’t have children until you are married. When you do have children, expect to live the traditional role of wife and mother unless your husband says otherwise. You should behave like a Titus Ch 2, Prov 31 type of woman.

12) Pay attention to and gently encourage women to engage in traditional roles at family functions and at church. This especially should be done in the presence of feminists and churchian egalitarians. As a classy, feminine, attractive woman who believes the Bible, you should stand against role reversals whenever possible.

13) Be mindful of your inclination to usurp power within intimate/domestic relationships, especially with men…whether a husband, suitor, or family members.

14) Make sure honesty and respect guide your sexual relationship with your husband. Review number 7. Forget about “romance” as represented in modern society. It promises what cannot be delivered. Read your Bible.

15) Don’t be an online bystander in the face of misandry. You may have sons one day. Also, review numbers 5 and 6.

16) Be responsible with money. You don’t need 100 pairs of shoes or credit card debt, and any husband, future or current, does not need the added burden these would create.

17) Exercise and eat right. Do you find overweight and out of shape men attractive?

18) Don’t speak ill of men. Do not slander or gossip.

19) Do not pay attention to or believe what the “sex of experts” and “key figures” in the media say about anything. They are blind fools leading other blind fools. See number 7 and read your Bible.

20) Ensure that your role models are (or were if deceased) God fearing women who submitted themselves to their husbands.

21) Praise the virtues of your husband, father, and / or brother(s) to others (especially to other women).

22) Demonstrate integrity with your female friends. (i.e., Don’t be a “ho.”). Also, don’t have “HOs” for friends. Don’t have friends that try to turn you against your husband or your father. Don’t have friends that talk bad about the men in their lives.

23) Don’t treat your husband or any other male family members disrespectfully. See number 4.

24)Know that acknowledging your own selfish opinions and stereotypes is not enough. Do something about them.

25) Do not have male “friends” or “beta orbiters”. Realize that the men you know are family, brothers in Christ, or acquaintances.

26) Submit to your father and, if married, your husband. Ask them for guidance and council. Also, find mature Christian women who take the whole council of God and have submitted themselves to their own husbands to teach you.

27) When courting, be responsible for events and special dates associated with your side of the family. When married, be responsible for all of it unless you husband says otherwise.

28) Men’s appearances should not be your concern unless they are suitors you are considering for marriage. Even then you should not nag them about it. See number 4.

29) Do not expect male family members or acquaintances to be at your beckon call. Be it to walk you home alone at night, or to a public space where you are likely to feel unsafe, or any other endeavor of your making. You can ask, but do not expect such treatment. Men are not beasts of burden that exist to serve you.

30) Inject wifely submission and biblical Patriarchy into your daily conversations with other women (especially with feminists and egalitarians) as often as possible.

31) Do not consume drugs or excessively drink alcohol. A woman of character is not a druggy or a drunk.

32) Be aware of the resources you consume, and don’t use more than is necessary. Someone is paying for it, and you can bet your bottom dollar it most likely is a man.

33) Don’t spread feminist none sense such as “income inequality” and “a woman can do anything a man can do”. Pretty much anything you hear a feminist claim as a fact will instead be a long refuted talking point.

34) Understand that your femaleness has an unearned privilege attached to it that you have to actively work to cede, and that being male comes with an unearned disadvantage that men have always had to bear.

35) Expose feminism for what it really is, rebellion against God and His creation and misandry in disguise

Jim #fundie blog.jim.com

When whites are driven out of affluent middle class areas which then become terrifying run down burned out urban jungles, it is not Jews that they are fleeing.

The inner city used to be where the affluent, the rich, and the upwardly mobile lived. It is not Jews that destroyed the inner city, Detroit, Ferguson, and are now destroying Chicago.

Female bad behavior comes from desire to fuck taciturn narcissistic assholes, starting at age eight or nine. If it was Jewish influence, they would want to fuck neurotic talkative dweebs resembling Woody Allen. Margaret Mead fucked people of both sexes and numerous races, but did not fuck Franz Boas.

Blaming Jews is yet another good news religion, because it is easy to gas the Jews, but considerably more difficult, and more disturbing, to keep women under loc parentis supervision from eight to menopause. So the program of restoring civilization sounds a lot easier if all you have to do to get things back on track is gas the Jews.

If we blame the Enlightenment, in particular and especially the extravagantly absurd claim that all men are created equal, if we blame blacks, single women, and the holiness spiral, then it looks like a harder problem, that requires us to do things that are inherently unpopular and unholy, whereas exterminating a market dominant minority is always popular, and you can very easily get away with representing it as holy. Jews are a market dominant minority, and we whites are about to become a market dominant minority.

People who hope to win an election with a universal franchise have to blame the Jews, or else blame whites in general. You cannot shut down a holiness spiral in a democracy except with another holiness spiral.

Muslims in Europe and America are very close to successfully representing gassing the Jews as holy, and shortly thereafter will go to work on similar representation of whites.

Notice eager Jewish collaboration in Muslim efforts to represent gassing the Jews as holy. This falsifies the doctrine that Jewish misbehavior is collectively rational behavior that advances the interests of “the Jews”.

I have often said that going after the Jews is goring the matador’s cape, rather than goring the matador. You have to shut down the holiness spiral itself, rather than a category of people that contains a disturbingly large proportion of exceptionally enthusiastic demon worshipers.

Shutting down the holiness spiral requires something like an inquisition. We don’t need to burn people at the stake, though Charles the second did need to burn a few people at the stake, in particular one alarmingly and excessively holy female heretic, whose holiness was inconveniently and irritatingly genuine, and whose Unitarian Christian derived belief system was alarmingly twenty first century. But mostly what Charles the second did was fire everyone in state and quasi state jobs, and invite them to re-apply for their old jobs. In the job interview, the applicant was asked whether he would “conform” – conform to the new standard of moderate holiness, which prohibited excessive holiness in general, and the old form of holiness in particular. If one declined to say he would conform, he did not get burned at the stake – but neither did he get his old job back. Many who declined to conform departed under their own power to New England. A few said they would conform, got their old jobs back, but then engaged in apostacy, and those ones Charles came down on pretty hard, but usually they got ridiculed and their careers got ruined, rather than burned at the stake. Looks to me that only one genuinely sincere and genuinely holy heretic got burned at the stake by Charles the Second, and all the others that were burned were two faced slimy lying hypocrites, and that most of the apostates just got laughed at and their careers stalled, rather than burned at the stake, or even fired. But you really do need to sometimes take firm measures against stubborn and excessively ostentatious holiness.

The problem with Jews is that they are a market dominant minority with a strong identity. Being a market dominant minority with a strong identity they are particularly subject to potential persecution, plus, in even in the absence of actual persecution, they still have an extremely strong persecution mythos, which makes them paranoid and hostile. Since one is going to get treated as a persecutor no matter what, one feels inclined to actually persecute them.

Jews are are inclined to attack the fabric of the host society, because when it’s strong it attacks them, and when it’s weak it lays off. The fabric of society is essentially everything “fascist”, so they are naturally anti-fascist insofar as they identify as jewish. Obviously this pattern has been reinforced. The reform jews most so because they are actually trying to integrate, which they can’t if everyone is Nordic Catholic “Fascists”.

When they engage in a holiness spiral, they don’t have any personal attachment to the things that their utopian schemes will destroy, or any concern about the reasons it won’t work. Whereas a white man would say “what about my job, family, community, ancestors, people, church, business”, your typical academic jew would say “Certain elements of the bourgeois will feel the move to equality as oppression (and I never liked those dumb goyim anyways)”.

Their talents make them useful to short-sighted elites, which puts them in the position of High, but with more mobility, more of a mobile bandit; they can always go elsewhere and feel just as at home. In addition to the insecurity they feel as a persecuted minority, they are naturally aligned with High which has in our recent history been engaged in destructive anti-fascism.

Their talents further mean that they are quite good at the subversion, which, lacking attachment to their host society, they naturally get into.

But the problem is not Jewish participation in subversion, it is that subversion is profitable, respected, and rewarded. Make it unprofitable, despised, and dangerous, and there will not be a Jew in sight.

Civilization is the art of people living together in large numbers: The basic problems of civilization are shutting down violence, ensuring that men and women agree to stick together for richer or poorer, or better or worse, and are forced to stick by that agreement, and securing property rights. Leftism is an attack on all of these, leftism is siding with the forces of entropy for political advantage, and Nazism is just leftism that has been left behind by a hundred years of movement even further left. “Fascism” is freedom, freedom is made possible by law, law is made possible by first establishing order, order is made possible by peace, peace first require victory, and victory requires war. Leftism reverses this chain of causation and moves us back towards the war of all against all. Leftism weaponizes covetousness and envy to attack property rights and female sexual lust to attack marriage. Single women, rather than Jews, vote for the mass import of rapeugees, because unconsciously they hope to be sold naked in chains on the auction block.

Observe what is happening with the Rohingya. The Rohingya correctly believe that a good Muslim should live under Muslim rule, and that a Muslim should establish Muslim rule wherever he lives. They attempted to establish a Muslim state in Burma, the Burmese were not having any, and are now expelling them. The expelled Rohingya don’t want to go to the USA. They want to go to a Muslim state, but Islamic states fear that if they accept the Rohingya, the Rohingya will decide that their hosts are insufficiently Islamic, or the wrong kind of Islamic. The US government wants them, wants to dump the on marginal electorates in flyover country, and you really cannot blame the Jews for this. You cannot blame the Rohingya for this. They don’t want to go to an infidel state. It is single female lust for men manly enough to subjugate them. If a bunch of east europeans were fleeing some place, I bet the PUAs would be keen on bringing them here.

angryblackduchess #fundie angryblackduchess.tumblr.com

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YmxxQgxssXY

So someone PM me this video asking me to comment on it. Now, I’m very happy that someone send me something other than a death threat and instead decided to ask for my council in a moral dilemma.
In this video, we see a man getting slap by his girlfriend. Now, before everyone grabs their pitchfork, I will say this, I have been cheated before so I understand perfectly her anger. An unfaithful man is barely a man and sometimes you need to remind him of that. But in this particular case, I think the victim is the man. She went a bit too far in her discipline method.
But even if the woman is in the wrong, I have to ask, why didn’t the man just walk away or even tried to defend himself? He knew he was probably just a tiny bit in the wrong as well.


[ So am i safe in assuming you would suport a man hitting his SO who cheated? I mean according to you its just a little “discipline” and “a woman who cheats is barley a woman at all, and sometimes they need to be reminded of that” ]


Even if hitting a man is a bad thing, It’s a symptom of a good thing happening: woman are finally taking their place in society. In the fifties, you would never seen a woman standing up to her man.

Flor #racist realjewnews.com

[In case it's not clear, she's talking about Jews.]

These Helloween lustful fat lesbian queens, ugly, horrific Babylonian witches and their demonic children trained as soulless phony parasitic pimps, pimping on women and children in Hellywood TV where actors, and especially actresses, are MK ultra monarch slaves for sexual orgies, orgies of blood for their October blood fests.

Helloween Queens whose children are live actors as Jasons, Jack the Rippers (Nov 9th is the 128th anniversary of the death of those helpless prostitutes in England, Jack the Ripper, those helpless women were butchered in ritual satanic abuse by some demonic depressed soulless being!) Hannibals the Cannibals, the seed of the devil.

All these movies they are real, and these demonic beings are the live actors, and they still have the guts to sell to Goys the movies showing how they butcher us.

Humanity is their personal farm.

Deep love on earth. They want to stop our jump to Quantum space, we came from the stars, and to the stars we will go.

Love on earth. Wake up your consciousness. They want to stop millenarian knowledge because they are parasites and we enrich them by being brutal and soulless.

Myra Adams #fundie barbwire.com


Daily headlines prove that Christian persecution has reached epidemic proportions, creating a global humanitarian and political crisis, most notably in the Middle East and Africa.

Concurrently, all Christians throughout the world are experiencing another form of persecution. On the surface it is peaceful and silent, but underneath just as deadly as the physical kind sans the torture, beheadings, and refugees.

This subtle form of Christianity bashing is so quiet that Christianity’s 2.4 billion followers are largely unaware it is even happening. The “persecution” comes from pressure by society and popular culture to abandon traditional B.C./A.D. time dating in favor of B.C.E./C.E. dating now quickly gaining worldwide acceptance.

[...]

Global embrace of the the term “Common Era,” while sounding so innocent, inclusive, and non-offensive, is actually a bloodless way of persecuting Christians by negating the historical fact that Jesus Christ so changed and shaped the world that since A.D. 525 that human history has been calculated and divided into time before and after his birth.

Wotans Krieger #racist aryan-myth-and-metahistory.blogspot.co.uk

Alcoholism and Drug Addiction: Weapons of War Against the Aryan Race
It should not come as any surprise to my readers that part of the malaise which affects our race may be attributed to excessive consumption of alcohol and illegal drug use. We must ask ourselves why now? Why have these problems gradually reached epidemic proportions in the late 20th and early 21st centuries? Were these problems predicted and indeed did certain parties conspire to bring about this state of affairs?

The Protocols of the Meetings of the Learned Elders of Zion reveal that mass drunkenness is part of the zionists' arsenal in stupifying the peoples of world, especially Aryan nations:

[...]

The section of our societies that are most affected by and targetted by drugs through the zionist controlled media, film industry and negrofied pop music are our youth, females as well as males. Indeed it is now commonplace to see drunken females walking around half naked in our towns and cities on Friday and Saturday nights. Our enemy is concerned with corruption of our youth in order to prevent any future challenge to zionist hegemony throughout the earth.

Without a doubt the educated youth of our peoples experienced great corruption in western universities from the late 1960s onwards and it is this educated generation of the late 1960s/early 1970s which for a number of years have held dominant positions in government and other institutions, using their positions of influence and power to corrupt later generations of youth. Universities from the late 1960s onwards have become little more than drinking dens where illegal drugs are encouraged, immoral sexual practices are engaged in and the minds of the young brainwashed with liberal-marxist propaganda.

[...]

As I have written before we know that in certain Aryan cultures drugs were used by some initiates in order to experience and enhance higher spiritual states of consciousness within a traditional framework. However the agents of zionism, hell-bent on destroying the fabric of Aryan societies have popularised the false notion that alcohol and narcotics should be freely available for all to use and indeed it is the intention of some politicians in the 'west' today to bring this about. These people are effectively zionist fifth columnists and should be viewed as such.

Oxford University Labour Club members #racist theguardian.com

The news that the Oxford University Labour Club co-chair has resigned due to claims of antisemitism within the club may have been shocking to some. To Jewish students at Oxford, it was not. The student left produces the most aggressive and virulent propagators of antisemitism on campus.

Alex Chalmers’ resignation statement was clear, emphasising that: “A large proportion of both OULC and the student left in Oxford more generally have some kind of problem with Jews.” The Oxford University Jewish Society noted that it was “not the first time that it has had to deal with antisemitic incidents within the student left and it will not be the last”. The Labour MP John Mann, chair of the all-party parliamentary group against antisemitism, has called for the party to sever all ties with the club.

Following Chalmers’ resignation, further allegations have appeared. Other OULC members, including past executive officers, approached Oxford University Jewish Society with a list of antisemitic incidents they had recorded. One OULC member argued that Hamas was justified in its killing of Jewish civilians and claimed all Jews were legitimate targets. A committee member stated that all Jews should be expected to publicly denounce Zionism and the state of Israel, and that we should not associate with any Jew who fails to do so. It has been alleged that another OULC member organised a group of students to harass a Jewish student and to shout “filthy Zionist” whenever they saw her.

This type of rhetoric is not confined to OULC. Leftwing student leaders have rallied against “any Rothschild” and “Zios” in their Facebook statuses. One of Oxford’s online political forums removed members with Jewish sounding surnames from the group. In another group, a member called for Jews to pack their bags and leave the Middle East. One notable far-left student politician said, “I don’t like being smeared as antisemitic, but I don’t bleed from it either.”

Relic #fundie christianforums.net

If the fools want to marry each other they will kill each other off with there spreading diseases to each other and they go about perforate each others colons, destroying each others bodies with their vile practices. No wonder the "average" life expectancy of a gay person is only 40 some odd years. [...]

If the gays think they can get away with living in such vile wicked behaviors they are sadly mistaken. And the proof is in the sad state of their affairs. They are not happy people. Not at all. They run from facing the root of their problems in life and think that they will find happiness in some perverted form of being which is outside of God's Holy Will for mankind. They mock and shake their fist at God. For shame. [...]

The homosexual "of today" is liken to an birth defect of epidemic proportions from out of society that sprung out of the outlandish liberal mindedness of the 60's generation. This too shall pass. They sick perverted demands of the gay community will not prevail. [...]

These people are in my prayers.

TA #fundie wattsupwiththat.com

That’s right, Sheri. The Vietnam war was the first time that reporters took the side of the Left in a big, public way, and used propaganda and lies to push the anti-war narrative and divide the American nation.

Before the Vietnam war, the MSM (a much smaller MSM than now) reported the news fairly straight. No huge bias towards either Left or Right, although they were pro-Kennedy and anti-Nixon during the 1960 elections, but their criticisms of Nixon were very mild compared to today (they made fun of Nixon sweating profusely on camera during one of the debates), but they didn’t make up lies about Nixon to harm him, like they are doing today against Trump.

Kennedy won the election that year. Both Kennedy and Nixon were in support of the war in South Vietnam, fearing a communist “domino effect” that might spread to the whole of Southeast Asia and even India, if something wasn’t done to stop it. Communism, at that time, was on the march all over the globe. The Left and the MSM have never looked back after the Vietnam war, and have made demonizing the Right as their main focus of attention, in order to gain and keep political power.

And they have been doing this “propaganda and lies” against the Right ever since, culminating in the flood of lies being put forth by the MSM today, in order to demonize Trump, and the Right in general. I actually went to Vietnam because of the lies put out by the MSM. According to the MSM, the American military was barely hanging on by a thread in South Vietnam, and getting beaten at every turn, when they fought against what the MSM described as “the toughest soldiers in the world”, the North Vietnamese and South Vietnamese Viet Cong communists.

They called them that, as a method of discouraging Americans and to make Americans give up on the war. All the MSM reporting was focused on this goal throughout the war and continues to this day. Lies and propaganda are legitimate tools as far as the American Left is concerned. I haven’t seen one Vietnam documentary I would consider even half-way accurate. I haven’t seen the new 10-part series on Vietnam that was recently broadcase on tv yet, but I’m sure that when I do, I will be disapponted in the accuracy of the reporting. If I’m not, it would be the first time.

Remember, the Left owns most of the media, so don’t expect a fair accounting of the Vietnam war from them. If it were a fair accounting, it would be an indictment of the anti-war Left and the MSM, and they can’t have that, so they continue to lie about the Vietnam war all these years later. I was in the Army, stationed in Wildflecken, Germany, at this time, and I read these daily dire reports of failure by the U.S. in South Vietnam, and said to myself, this can’t be true, because if it were true, then my whole worldview was wrong, so I had to go see for myself because I had to know. So I volunteered to go to South Vietnam in May 1968.

When I got to South Vietnam, I found out that they were all lies and anti-war propaganda. The “toughest soldiers in the world’ were the American troops who kicked the hell out of the North Vietnamese troops and the Viet Cong, throughout the war. My worldview was the correct worldview after all. General Giap, the Supreme Commander of the North Vietnamese military, and the architect of the war strategy, told a reporter after the war, that the American troops won just about every battle in South Vietnam, but that didn’t matter because North Vietnam had the American anti-war Left and the MSM on their side. He was exactly right.

American troops defeated the North Vietnamese troops and the North Vietnamese finally came to the bargaining table, and after the Peace Accord was signed, South Vietnam was still there as a viable nation with a bright future ahead of it. Then the anit-war Left in the U.S. Congress just threw away all that blood, sweat, and tears expended in Vietnam, by refusing to come to South Vietnam’s aid after North Vietnam violated the Peace Agreement and again attacked South Vietnam in 1975.

The Left controlled Congress in those days, and it was right after Nixon had resigned over Watergate, so the Left felt imboldened and just turned their backs on South Vietnam and threw them to the wolves. Like Obama did to the Iraqis in 2011. In both cases, millions of innocent people were killed and displaced from their homes as a result. What is so ironic is that this last attack by North Vietnam in 1975, started out with them sending a large proportion of their fighting forces into northern, South Vietnam, to the point that they created gridlock with every highway, road, and trail jam-packed with North Vietnamese troops and military equipment frozen in place, and unable to move forward or backward, and they were sitting ducks for American B-52 bombers out of Guam.

The B-52’s could have spent about a week or two carpet bombing the stalled North Vietnamese forces and would have for all intents and purposes, wiped them out where they sat, and the war would have been over and North Vietnam would have been in very dire straights with most of their military destroyed. It would only have taken a short time (hours) to get the B-52’s over the enemy, but the American Left refused to come to the aid of South Vietnam, even though they were legally and morally obligated to do so.

My natural skepticism sent me to Vietnam. I found out that the MSM had been lying all along (like today) and that the MSM was biased, and were not above lying to push this political objective of getting the U.S. out of Vietnam. Up until then, I thought the MSM was telling it straight but I found out otherwise when I saw it for myself. I have been on a one-man crusade against the Left and especially the MSM, ever since. I know how dangerous their lies really are to our society and to our allies in the world. In other words, the Left and the MSM, and their lies, put U.S. national security at risk every day because they lie about the true situation.

American Leftists are incapable of defending U.S. national interests. They have proven it time after time, Obama being the latest example of the delusional thinking taking place in Leftist’s minds. The Iraq war was won, then Obama sat there and twiddled his thumbs while the Islamic Terror Army attacked and gained in strength and territory every day, displacing and killing millions of innocent people in the process.

Obama acted like an innocent bystander and never took any serious measures to stop the terroirsts. It was almost like he was on the terrorists side, not our side. So the big divisions in the U.S. did start during the Vietnam war, and the Left continues to divide us to this very day, epitomized again by Barack Obama and his racebaiting and identity politics. One bright spot is the public is on to the MSM now. They know they are a bunch of partisan, political liars. The Left and the MSM still have millions of people fooled, but there are millions more who are no longer fooled, Trump’s election demostrates this.

We should all get down on our knees and thank God that Trump got into Office. Only a person like him, vulgar and brash as he is, could take on the Left and the MSM successfully and win this battle. If he wins, we all win. We all need to stand up and fight the false narratives and distorted realities put out by the Left and the MSM, if we value our personal freedoms.

A British Man in London #racist abritishmaninlondon.blogspot.co.uk

First, who is an alien? Any 'human' staying in Europe not of entirely European ancestry. European Jews are allowed to stay provided they do not advocate ideas hostile to the health of Europe. In addition there are exceptions available under certain circumstances. Examples include, a license to operate a take-away restraunt for a limited period or in the case of the advanced east-asians, co-operation on scientific and engineering matters, and finally guest University lectureres.

There are several million colonisers and invaders in Europe and they must be removed.

Broad Options Available

1. Forced deportation to their racial homelands. For economic reasons it might be better to dump them all in sub-saharen Africa. In the case that the alien has money he may be given the option to pay for his own transportation to his racial homeland. All other wealth of aliens will be confiscated. This option is the most extreme.

2. Full sterilisation OR deportation as above.

3. The legal enforcement of a 1 child per alien couple rule. This is an enforced demographic collapse rather like what is actually happennig to the native European folk.

4. Tax incentives for employment of native Europeans. Effectively a tax against employing non-Europeans. This would force a large proportion of aliens out of Europe. Naturally all welfare would removed from alien recipients.

How to deal with mixed-race 'persons' (aproxmiately 1 million in Great Britain alone)
Options
1. Sterilsation
2. Reproduction allowed provided with other mischlings but only 1 off-spring permitted.
3. Deportation to an island or possibly sub-saharan Africa.

How to deal with race mixing Europeans?

They should be offered the opportunity to renouce their behaviour.
Failing that they must have the same fate as their alien partners. We do not want them, they are a subverting force.

Bill P #racist unz.com

A large proportion of what you hear from the left these days would indeed be considered inciting racial hatred if you applied their own standards in an objective way. I can’t even listen to NPR anymore without the feeling that many of the hosts would be happy to have me genocided.

Ultimately, I think that’s what’s going to happen: some group of whites is going to be slaughtered somewhere. Probably in South Africa or some similar area.

Conservapedia #fundie facebook.com

A medical journal article published by the American Medical Association entitled Religious Commitment and Health Status indicates: "A large proportion of published empirical data suggest that religious commitment may play a beneficial role in preventing mental and physical illness, improving how people cope with mental and physical illness, and facilitating recovery from illness."

Does faith in God prevent mental illness in people?
https://www.conservapedia.com/Irreligion_and_recovery_from_illnesses?fbclid=IwAR04TklYliTlgzdjwn0mrYHHKM4CywPOD_TQjXO24JhYTgK3V8oZZBaFdas

Anti Zionist League #racist #conspiracy #homophobia antizionistleague.com

The Well Poisoners – ‘Coronavirus’

Mildly changing tack since the Black Death, which did actually wipe out more than half the Caucasoid population, using their Chinese proxy the well poisoners have induced panic with what easily could be a contrived pandemic. Prior to the pestilence that was later known as the ‘Black Death’ the Jewish merchants were the bankers and financiers (without competition) with papal and royal protection. Like the Black Death this ‘virus’ began in China which is now Communist. Most scholars agree that a Jewish community has occupied Kaifeng in the Henan province of China since the Northern Song Dynasty (960–1127), though some date their influx to the Tang Dynasty (618–907) or earlier; well over 300 years before the Black Death. During the Ming Dynasty (1368–1644), a Ming emperor conferred eight surnames upon the Jews, by which they are identifiable today: Ai, Shi, Gao, Gan, Jin, Li, Zhang, and Zhao. It was on a branch of the Silk Road that Jewish merchants descended on Kaifeng territory and from there had easy access to the network of trade routes which connected East and West and later along which the plague followed. Not until September 1348 did the first recorded ‘confession’ take place in the Castle of Chillon on Lake Geneva. The accused had admitted that a Jew of Savoy had poisoned wells and food “so as to kill and destroy the whole of Christianity”. Yet in each of the countries were the Jews were punished the plague came to an abrupt end. Despite their apparent ‘untouchability’ their crime was laid bare, perhaps cutting to close to their protectors, it was now known that the Jews were to blame for the Black Death.

Jews have intermarried with local Chinese sufficiently to be indistinguishable in appearance from their non-Jewish neighbours just like the Jews that occupy Europe. Indeed the founding of the Communist Party of China (CPC) in 1921, a Jewish ideology invented by the Jew Karl Marx the Grandson of a long line of Rabbis, and its formidable rise is testament to their concealment and manipulation. It is also vital to note that according to the Jewish Press “85 to 90% of the foreigners helping the Chinese at the time of the Communist takeover were Jewish” including Louisa Sachs (Goldman) the daughter of the Jew Marcus Goldman founder of the brokerage firm Goldman Sachs. Just like in the Russian Empire for over a decade prior to Communist seizure thousands of Communist Jews had been subverting the political landscape having been smuggled in under the guise of victimhood, by Ho Feng-Shan to secure a Communist victory. In fact China’s most renowned export is the so called martial arts icon Bruce Lee; elevated to almost mythic status the Jewish Press has proclaimed his Jewish heritage. Of course this is not unique, the Jews have always had us worship them, if not through Christianity then through their Hollywood machine with the likes of Chaplin, Fairbanks, Cary Grant, Douglas, Stallone, Jean-Claude Van Damme, Bacall, Goldie Hawn and Scarlett Johansson. Even the goyim convert to be successful Elizabeth Taylor, Marilyn Monroe; or are elevated because of a perverted lifestyle (homosexuality) Garbo, Marlene Dietrich, Rock Hudson, Dirk Bogarde, Brando, James Dean, Jodie Foster to name but a few. The apparently ‘gullible, naive and trusting Chinese’ have allowed the Jew sanctuary while the tribe has been in the process of seizing control of the Caucasoid infrastructure: “governments, media, education and entertainment” and using it to implement their destructive narrative. Meanwhile, just as Scott Robert has pointed out sugar coated and right under our noses, European jobs and industry are outsourced to the Far East.

Although the nefarious Jewish element has been scheming amongst us for millennia following the Jewish seizure of Europe in 1945 the Jew has spent the last 70 years accelerating his agenda. Now at the point of contrived crisis they appeal to the atomised to pull together knowing the impossibility, laughing and rubbing their hands at their achievement. Even alerts from the Jewish Prime Minister of Britain, asserting that now is the time to pull together while appealing to the public to stay 2 meters apart, are an absurd oxymoron only attesting to his Chutzpah. Coincidentally, between 1975 and 1977 the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) predictively programmed a fiction drama series called Survivors. It concerns the plight of a group of people who have survived an apocalyptic plague pandemic, which was accidentally released by a Chinese scientist and quickly spread across the world via trade roots. Given the extreme circumstance in which the characters find themselves the script is far from fanciful (Hollywood nonsense) and well worth a watch. The result of a Jewish think tank and puts an end to the absurd claims of the Alt-Right that the media acts independently. Indeed the enemy has created the ideal environment (multiculturalism, immigration) in order to spread disease yet political correctness (Cultural Marxism) prevents the public from pointing the finger at this course if indeed it is a disease. Clearly trust fails when one knows those in authority are Jewish. Indeed we are lead to believe that this virus originated in China and spread to other hot lands. Yet the Jewish Prime Minister of Britain Boris Johnson, a minority exerting his interests for the majority, insults our intelligence by informing the populous that come the summer the virus will slow down. This site certainly fails to see the logic. Jewish manipulation works wonders just like the ‘fleas on rats’ blamed for the 14th century plague that could not survive in the much cooler northern climate but served as an ideal distraction for the tribes criminal act. Interestingly, whilst Europe was in recovery from a devastating world war brutalising a generation in its prime the 1918/19 flu epidemic hit. Killing between 50 million and 100 million people, it was mysteriously misnamed the Spanish flu even though it was known it arrived from a military base in Jewish occupied America.

Dr.D #racist sarahmaidofalbion.blogspot.com

I would add to that that there is only one solution. That solution is total separation, removal of all blacks from Britain.

Sure, some of them are not rapists. Some of them are not murderers. And so forth. But it seems that everyone of them carries the seed for these acts, and a large proportion of them act upon that seed. When you are pulling weeds in the garden, you do not only pull the ones that have gone to seed, you get them all. That is what must be done with the blacks.

The same thing applies to the muzlims as well.

Only when these measures are taken will the UK be restored to health as a sound, reasonable, Western nation.

Oxford University Labour Club members #racist timesofisrael.com

An inquiry into allegedly “poisonous” anti-Semitic attitudes within Oxford University’s Labour Club has revealed that some members referred to Auschwitz as a “cash cow,” sang about rockets over Tel Aviv, made fun of Jewish mourners and fatalities during TV coverage of funerals for the 2015 Paris supermarket attack victims, and made allowances for anti-Semitic attacks on Paris synagogues the year before.

The allegations emerge from testimony obtained by the Sunday Times in connection with a student probe into claims of anti-Semitism within the university’s Labour society.

That probe followed the resignation mid-February of the club’s non-Jewish co-chairman in protest at the society’s endorsement of Israeli Apartheid Week. In a sharply worded statement, Alex Chalmers claimed that “a large proportion of both OULC and the student Left in Oxford more generally have some kind of problem with Jews.”

Writing on Facebook, Chalmers accused members of the Labour club’s executive of “throwing around the term ‘Zio’ [a term for Jews usually confined to websites run by the Ku Klux Klan] with casual abandon.” He wrote of “senior members of the club expressing their ‘solidarity’ with Hamas and explicitly defending their tactics of indiscriminately murdering civilians.” He also quoted an unnamed former co-chairperson of the club as claiming, “Most accusations of anti-Semitism are just the Zionists crying wolf.”

Bill P #fundie unz.com

"Scott Tsuchitani is a smart guy. He has two master’s degrees in engineering already. He’s not getting his Ph.D. in cultural studies because that’s all he could do with his mind."

No, he’s doing it because he hates white people, and he wants to punish them through their children. A depressingly large proportion of educators fits that profile.

Blemonds #fundie christianforums.com

They are to blame. Had AIDS been treated as a contagious disease like other contagious diseases, it would never have reached such epidemic proportions. But they whined about their civil rights, ignoring the civil rights and safety of the rest of society so that they could relish their perverse behavior and force the rest of us to pay for it trhough our taxes and our health and our incresed health care costs.

Jim #sexist blog.jim.com

The trouble with Rotherham is not that white girls were raped and beaten, but that Muslims get exemption to be manly as women understand manliness, and whites and Hindus do not.

The Rotherham girls were raped, threatened, and beaten all right, but they were also complicit in the violence.

For the most part, the pimp, rather than aggressively forcing his women into prostitution by the threat or actuality of violence, is aggressively, but unsuccessfully, attempting to restrain them from prostitution by the threat or actuality of violence, and to the extent that he goes along with their prostitution, is just being the dancing monkey, pretending to be in charge so as to retain some tattered shreds of manliness despite being massively cuckolded.

Human female sexuality is closer to feline female sexuality than to chimpanzee female sexuality. Apes are primarily vegetarians, but we are descended from killer apes. Even when sex involves quite dangerous violence against women plus infanticide and plenty of it, as it rather often does, human females are massively complicit in that violence and infanticide. The women that pimps go through the motions of oppressing are topping from the bottom, and pimps are more accurately understood as the cucked and oppressed victims of lustful bawdy women.

Prostitution is frequently in substantial part an alarmingly enthusiastic and endlessly continuing search for a male who is alpha as women understand alpha – which manliness and alpha character is in substantial part is demonstrated by criminal violence against women and children and being able to get away with violence against women and children.

Even when sex involves a lot of violence against women and children, as it often does, it is the pimps that are the real victims, being brutally cucked by their lustful women.

If a girl is being sexually trafficked, there is absolutely no way the pimp can stop her from wandering off with one of her customers, and whores do this with great regularity. The client is trying to “rescue” the girl from prostitution and her brutal pimp and human trafficker, but she then tries to turn him into a pimp and cuckold. Hence the saying:

“You can take the girl out of the bar, but you cannot take the bar out of the girl.”

Reality is that all the power is in the hands of the whores, not the pimps, which deeply frustrates the women, who are endlessly searching for manly power and authority in all the wrong places, and not finding it. Everyone gets hurt, no one gets their desires fulfilled.

The Democrats prefer to import Jihadis, criminals, and whores. Jihadis and criminals because they can be relied upon to vote Democratic, whores because they will become cat ladies who can be relied upon to vote Democratic. As a rationalization for importing whores, they implemented the “blue campaign”, which defined illegal immigrant whores to be victims of human trafficing, which the government proceeded to “rescue”.

The purported “victim-centered approach” – as opposed to criminal-focused prosecutions – was mostly a fraud-enabling way in the spirit of asylum/refugee fraud to give a bunch of illegal alien women yet another zero-scrutiny way to claim a victim status that was a free and quick golden ticket to a green card. Cf: U Visas). “Some evil man trafficked my humanness here and took all my documents which are totally from a country that is both unable and unwilling to cooperate with your investigators.”)

Men who come here to kill us and take our stuff will reliably vote Democratic, and women who are whores will remain single, and thus reliably vote Democratic.

Hence the striking and conspicuous preference for importing criminals, Jihadis, and whores.

Two incidents with a woman:

I protected her.

We were walking along a little used path in a semi rural area when a dog charged us barking furiously. She would have run, in which case the dog would have done a large circle around me and attacked her (a barking dog always wants to attack from behind) so I tightened my grip on her, and turned to face the dog while sweeping her behind me like a sack of potatoes and prepared to strike at the dog with my free hand and with one foot. The dog, seeing my focused immobility, the steady predator gaze of the tiger in ambush, abruptly spun around, tucked its tail between its legs, and fled.

Heh, I thought. Massive display of protective manliness. She is going to remember this fondly.

Wrong!

Wrong again!

She totally and completely forgets it.
I endangered her:
“Why”, I ask, “are we at the kiddy pool?”
“I cannot swim”, she replies.

I pick her up.

“Hey, put me down”, she screams. She then realizes that I carrying her off to the adult pool. Her screaming redoubles.

She then realizes that I am carrying her off to the deep end of the adult pool, and realizes I am going to throw her into it. She screams and struggles.

I am doing this in front of her family, in front of several male members of her family. The trip from the kiddy pool to the deep end of the adult pool requires me to walk past the security guy, who is responsible for order and safety.

I am old and at that time was rather fat. She is young and slim. I am walking very briskly, so, obvious sexual predator forcibly abducting screaming young girl, or at least a guy being disorderly and endangering safety. To avoid triggering his white knight impulses, I totally ignore him, and keep my gaze steady on my destination, so I don’t know how he reacted. As usual, when I act with confidence and determination, as I have learned to do in the presence of fertile age women, no one gets in my way.

I toss her in, shortly thereafter get laid like a rug.

I really do not like violence against women all that much. The incident with the dog was way more in accord with my sexual fantasies. Truth is, I had been warned there was a dangerous and aggressive dog in that area. I had no way of knowing for sure that I would be able to intimidate it or defeat it, but was confident I could. I have plenty of experience with dangerous and aggressive dogs. Dogs, like humans, can tell if you are seriously considering killing them and think you might be able to accomplish it. It was totally a setup to give effect to my sexual fantasies. But I am a dancing monkey, and I do what it takes to get laid. Eggs are dear, sperm is cheap, so male fantasies do not matter, and female fantasies do matter. That is just the way the world is. Women do not particularly want protection, and are disinclined to cooperate with males who protect them. The early James Bond movies reflect male fantasies. Female fantasies involve motorcycle gang leaders, vampires, demons, and serial killers, and men have no alternative but to play along. I must dance, and women call the tune.

The Rotherham problem was not Muslims out of control, but women out of control. The cure is not to restrain Muslims, but to restrain women.

For women to reproduce successfully, they have to be under male authority, and in the modern world, they look for that authority and do not find it.

Female behavior makes total sense from the point of view of evolutionary psychology when you reflect that the barista with an advanced degree in women’s studies and one hundred thousand dollars in college debt will probably become a cat lady, but if Islamic State was militarily victorious, and auctioned her off naked and in chains at public auction, would probably have seven children and twenty grandchildren.

It also makes total sense if you take the story of the fall seriously. It is the curse of Eve. “thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.”

It also makes sense of female voting behavior. Single women have no country. They want us to be conquered, they want their male kin to be castrated, so they can finally get into the possession of someone strong enough to own them.

Whenever someone talks about rape in the sense of the female not consenting, implying it is perfectly fine and completely normal if she has sex without her father consenting, or engages in serial monogamy, he is normalizing a morally degenerate male fantasy that fails to correspond to observed female revealed preference.

Women perceive protective manliness as something as natural as the sun rising in the east, and aggressive male dominance as an extraordinary gift from heavens to be adored and worshiped.

Which makes total sense from the point of view of evolutionary psychology, since aggressive male dominance is likely to result in being auctioned off naked and in chains, followed by seven children and twenty grandchildren, while protective manliness is likely to result in becoming a cat lady.

Female sexual autonomy results in defect/defect equilibrium, the equilibrium of whores and pimps. Nobody gets what they want. Queen Gwenevere cheats on King Arthur with Lancelot, King Arthur finds out, Camelot falls because of internal disunity, and everyone gets killed.

Protective manliness that protects the sexual autonomy of women, protective manliness that protects Queen Gwenevere’s sexual autonomy, is not only unappreciated by women, but is white knighting, is wicked, evil, and morally degenerate. The curse of Eve is that women should not have sexual autonomy, and endlessly look for a man strong enough to take it away from them.

Be that man.

In order to reproduce successfully, women need to be conquered and subdued. Her owner can then safely invest in her. With female sexual autonomy he cannot, so he does not. Her bearing children for her owner, means her holding hostages against him, thus cooperate/cooperate equilibrium.

VirginKing24 #sexist incels.co

I don't understand foids...

It's hilarious how hypocrisy most foids are, they hate to be looked upon as objects yet they shamelessly throw themselves out there like a piece of meat for the Chads. They do sex work like escorts, cam stripper, phone sex operation etc etc... One minute they wanna be treated like princesses and queens with respect and the next they wanna be like tramps and scrubbers. I just can't anymore...

ThereNeedsToBeChange #racist reddit.com

Asian woman wants white guys then cries RACISM (!!!) when the white guy prefers to date within his race. In contrast, Asian men just want their own race - whereas these Asian women feel entitled to OTHER races. They are the true entitled ones

So I mean, going through the article, some things that struck me...

Lately, my single, female friends have been telling me about the extraordinary messages they receive on sites like Tinder, OkCupid and Hinge.

Like yes, omg, it's totally "extraordinary" that a white guy says he only wants to date white \s. In fact, I say good for him

And also, notice how her female friends are clearly all Asian (and possibly other minorities), yet she is clearly set on a white guy. Again, this disproves all the "well, I live in a white area, so it's natural my partner would be white" - with this logic, her female friends would also be white, but with 90% of these women, I notice they have an extremely disproportionate number of Asian female friends - sometimes even exclusively Asian female friends - yet they never have Asian men as friends, let alone a partner.

this actual line on the profile of a sun-kissed Liam Hemsworth lookalike

So, praising whites and insinuating that whites are the ultimate form of attractiveness hence actively bashing her own race, all the while claiming whites are racist who claim the exact same thing. Afterall, this is comparable to a favourite sibling syndrome - if you constantly praise one sibling as being amazing-looking, intelligent and whatnot 1000s upon 1000s of times, then the other sibling is naturally going to take offence, even if they are never actually offended directly. Same with these Asian women - even if they don't explicitly bash Asian men, they still are actually bashing Asian men by praising white men and hence re-enforcing the idea that you have been told since childhood that - as an Asian man - you will never be as good as whites.

You’d never find a job ad that discriminates against applicants based on race. That’s against the law. Why is it okay, then, to announce a ban against engaging with a race of people on your dating profile?

But when Asian women say "no Asian men", these very same Asian women will claim it's just "muh preference" or they'll try to justify it with some other bs - "he looks like my brother", "Asian men are misogynistic" and even the "I don't want an Asian mother in law"

Some openly announce "NO ASIANS/ NO BLACKS". I wonder how harmful this might be to an Asian, like me, or black person, to see this regularly – how this might diminish our self-hood and dignity.

Riiiiiiight...but since like 10 years old, Asian men have grown up seeing 100,000s of Asian women in wmaf proudly, smugly and arrogantly declare Asian men to be inferior and she clearly doesn't view that of concern. Afterall, like my point her, Asian men have had 100,000 strikes against them, she's had 1 and now she's the one complaining? And besides, being told you aren't good enough by your own kind is always going to insult you more than being told you aren't good enough by some complete randomer.

An Asian female friend announced recently that the vitriol she experienced on Tinder became too heavy a psychological burden. She deleted her account two days ago.

If this was genuine racism (i.e. "suck my dick you dumb g00k bitch"), then fine, but if it's just because she only match with 500 white guys and a small handful said they prefer white women, then I find it impossible to see what the problem is

and those whom English is a second language can’t offer anything of value?

And I mean, this is just outright false. Asian female immigrants/foreigners are targetted very strongly by wm looking for easy sex/wanting to live out racist fantasies (fucking an Asian woman from each ethnicity as a form of conquest and calling/viewing them as each appropriate racial slur etc). And sure, I would hope to any self-respecting woman it wouldn't be wanted attention, but the way she claims they are ignored is simply false. Afterall, I remember going to a nightclub in London when I was 18 - ALL of the female Asian international students/tourists were able to go home and fuck a white guy despite their poor English, but how many Asian guys who had poor English were able to woo the white women in the club? Yeah, I think we all know the answer. For a woman, having traits that make you less powerful (less money, not able to speak the language, naivity of the culture) etc aren't a negative thing and will be viewed in a positive light by many predatory men. I know plenty of female Asian international students who fucked 50 white guys during their time in the UK - how many of the male Asian international students fucked 50 white women though, do you think?

There's an ugly sense of entitlement

Again, a white guy wanting a white woman is not being entitled. An Asian woman feeling entitled to a white man - i.e. someone of a different race - is the real entitled one

Dating apps must reflect the same standards of non-discrimination as those expected in the broader community. I urge them to act quickly to remove users who do not comply with these guidelines and to effectively resolve complaints where racism is brought to their attention.

And lmao, this would mean that most Asian women in white areas would be banned then for their extreme "no Asians" policy. And likewise, all these specialist wmaf bride sites would be banned (I agree they should be), most of the Asian women on all these degenerate hookup sites etc too would be banned

And then, surprise surprise, she even admits:

When I ask several friends about their swiping habits on apps like Tinder and OkCupid, and they don’t deny that most of the men they swipe right are white Anglo.

--------------------------------------

And you know, it's also funny when she says something like this:

I’d want to grant a stranger the dignity to be treated as an individual.

Because, you know, she honestly doesn't believe that whites on those apps don't just view her through every racial stereotype imaginable - i.e.:

- "ching chong ling long"/"me luv u long time"/"sucky sucky 5 dorrah"/"lbfm"/"slit-eyed bitch"/"chink whore"/"g00k cumbucket" etc etc etc etc etc

- someone who has no self-respect (the typical "Asian bitches are slaves to whites"/"white-worshipping whore" etc)

- someone who hates her own kind

etc etc etc etc etc

See, the reality is, that unlike what she is stating, it isn't the white guys who want white women that are the ones who are racist - it's the ones who want Asian women that are

BlkPillPres #fundie incels.co

(Emphasis original)

Inceldom Is Actually A Blessing In Disguise (If You Let It Be)

Made this thread to respond to a specific post that I thinks need to be addressed because it reflects the general mindset of a lot of the incels on this site (incels in general actually). Its a false mindset, you guys clearly haven't "studied" and interacted with normies enough to see whats really going on.

Thread here - https://incels.me/threads/my-whole-fucking-life-is-done.31324/#post-534850

@13k

I can relate to that as a 27 year old dude. My friends from university and HS are having children now. It is really soul crushing experience.

I lack behind so bad, it is depressing. Everybody moved on with their lives, and i am still here. Kissless virgin living in a condo at age 27 when people of my age are moving and progessing in life.

Most people in here will move on with their lives too. It is really brutal when you think about it. We are losers even here in this forum.

A lotta sexually frustrated kids here in this forum will reflect back on these days with sad cringe a couple years later thinking "ah, i was just an edgy sexually-frustrated teenager back then".

We are the real losers here. Suicide inducing..


Your standards are too high, and I don't mean for choosing women, I mean for what you expect from life, you have to adapt, we weren't born in the 50's, we were born in the era of whores (in my 20's), I've never felt love, only lust, never really wanted to get married all that much, only thought about it because parents try to poke that shit into their childrens heads over the years. I've started to realize that I'm not suffering as much as many of the incels on this site because I had the best "default mindset" for someone who would grow to be incel.

I only want sex, I don't want to feel desired, or admired, etc, I abandoned my ego years ago, I just want to enjoy the physical feeling that comes when you ejaculate into a womans body, and for that there's escorts, if I had your financial means I likely would have never even found this site because I'd be too busy, watching anime, playing games and fucking whores happily to care. Glad I found the site though.

Change your standards, not for women, but for life, latching onto normie standards when you clearly aren't one is illogical, the moment you focus on what you can enjoy in this life rather than what you can't enjoy you'll stop wasting time and feel a lot better. Also you are only getting to see the surface level of all the "happy family" BS that your friends ALLOW YOU TO SEE, most everything normies do is all about appearances, you see the smiling faces in images of vacations and family trips, you don't see the arguments your friend has with his wife about how little sex they have these days, that he suspects she's cheating, that he's worried about his son possibly being gay, that he thinks his daughter is no longer a virgin, the arguments that comes with the financial stress of having a family (mortgage, vehicles, tuition, school supplies, etc). You don't see all that shit, because they don't want you to, they only let you see "the good shit".

Most of the happiness normies get from the things you THINK you are missing out on IS SHORT LIVED, that's the great irony, we didn't really lose out on anything (inb4 this is cope), the only parts we legit missed out on were the PHYSICAL PARTS, the parts they enjoyed in their youth, most of which was an illusion anyways that they could only enjoy in blissful ignorance. Love isn't even a real thing, its just a chemical reaction in the brain, they weren't "teens in love", they were "teens in lust", but we only get to see those relationships from the outside looking in, so it looks so "magical" and "grand", again you didn't hear about all the bad shit, you never do, because normies don't like airing out their dirty laundry for others to see.

I have a friend that was going to be a doctor, complete normie coper, had "inspirational quotes" and shit on his book covers, studied hard, way smarter than me, would have definitely became a doctor, got all the necessary qualifications to pursue his university degree. The girl he was with for years cheated on him and he rebounded quick, he wasn't careful and a few months after he got his rebound pregnant when he was trying to get into university, guess who had to drop out and become a cuck, that's right him, in a lot of his images all I can see now is depression, he tries to hide it but he can't hide it well, met him in person at a store once too, he's now TRAPPED IN HIS OWN LIFE. Is sex enjoyable yes, and that's the only part of relationships that were really missing out on (unless you are some kind of idiot egoist that just wants to have their ego stroked, if so fuck off, this post is not for you, you will never be satisfied). Guess what, how much time for sex do you think people have when they have a child to worry about....... are you getting the point yet, the path that all normies take IRONICALLY LEADS THEM TO BE JUST AS UNHAPPY AS WE ARE.

I don't understand how you guys are so blind, WE ARE LIVING THE INVERSE LIVES OF NORIMES (Can't you see it?)

Normies start off having amazing lives, thrilling "emotions", great sex lives, having fun, but part of being a normie is "settling down", they are all followers because part of normie life is "fitting in", so they all mostly follow that road. As they reach the "settling down" phase their lives slowly become like ours, especially more so for the men, their sex lives dry up, they stop feeling less for the person they "love" and get hit with the black pill that even feelings fade over time because the human brain is wired to grow accustomed too and "bored" of similar stimuli.

Can you fap to the same porn video, every single day for for a month and REALLY get off to it, no, by the second week it won't be as enjoyable, now imagine the reality of this, but applied to a person OVER YEARS. That's the first black pill normies are forced to accept in their later years, you not only get bored of a person over time, but you get bored of "loving them" and eventually want someone else. Your brain is wired to do this, its part of our biological imperatives, monogamy is a forced thing, it isn't even normal for most other animals.

We however are somewhat cursed with how our lives began, but IT IS A BLESSING IN DISGUISE. We got black pilled early on all the shit that normies will end up learning ONLY WHEN ITS TOO LATE, we don't have to end up "trapped in our own lives". Don't get married, dont have children, just spend your years having sex with random beautiful women and enjoying your hobbies (whether you're paying for it (escorts), or looks/wealth maxxing to coerce women into fucking you). We've only failed at life here if we fail to take advantage of the benefits that come with having been incel, and that benefit is KNOWLEDGE.

Why do you guys think a mid life crisis is a "normal" and culturally known thing for men?, its because many men only start considering the shit we already thought of years ago, in their old age, when its too late to make changes because you have commitments to fulfill. So they perform copes like "buying a nice car" or "dressing differently", or the most outright admission of what I talked about above in relation to sex - THEY HAVE AN AFFAIR. They realize too late in life that one woman isn't enough.

I could never admire normies, not at this point, I already know how most of my other friends lives are going to end up, most of them are gonna be beta providers for some used up whore, have a few kids that will be hard to raise in this shitty era (kids might not even be theirs), probably get cheated on years into the marriage and maybe never find out because "tee hee, its for the best, I don't want to hurt you, I love you". Normiedom is the biggest long con, we ironically got screwed out of making a shitty deal, but again, we can only make this into a positive with effort and applying the black pill mindset practically. If you just LDAR, be a neet, don't work and build your wealth, then you're just going to remain a poor sex starved suidical poor sap, but if you do the opposite you'll actually look back on the days laughing at when you envied normies.

This isn't cope, this is reality, and I know I can't be the only person who has come to this realization, I have to work and talk to normies everyday so I have to learn to "blend in" and talk to them, every single damn relationship is terrible and the only glue that holds it all together IS SEX. Their lives are very "fragile". I know a guy right now (normie) who a month before was telling me about how great his GF is and how perfect she is and that they're getting married, last week he cheated on her with some random how who he ADMITS ISN'T AS ATTRACTIVE lol. He still plans on marrying her, do you see how much of a joke this BS fake illusion of the magical lives you think they're living is, stop fooling yourself, I could literally just message this girl and destroy his entire "construct" of "normie life" and let he know he cheated and who he did it with. But I won't because I don't care enough about his life to do it, I'm focusing on building my wealth, and fighting some normie right now isn't to my benefit, I just laugh and observe at these peoples lives, they project this air of happiness, especially online, but they are miserable, they are all LITERALLY COPING WITH THE JAIL CELL THAT IS THEIR ADULT LIFE (especially the ones with children, when you have kids ITS OVER).

Patrick Scrivener #conspiracy reformation.org

Before Lilibet was crowned in 1953, 3 kings were eliminated to make way for her enthronement. King George V was given the poison cup; King Edward VIII was forced to abdicate, and King George VI was also given the poison cup.

King George V was a grandson of Queen Victoria and the second son of King Edward VII.

He was king during the terrible conflict called World War I and he was king when the Twins were born.

Prince George married Mary of Teck in 1893 and the couple had 6 children: Edward, Albert, Mary, Henry, George, and John.

Bertrand Edward Dawson, 1st Viscount Dawson of Penn, was the physician to the royal family and president of the Royal College of Physicians. He was responsible for the timely demise of King George V.

The DOCTOR is the most important person in a republic or a monarchy because he/she holds the power of life and death over the ruler.

On the night of January 20, 1936, Dr. Dawson gave the king 2 lethal injections so that the announcement of his death would be timed for inclusion in The Times of January 21.

Dawson did not want the announcement to appear first in the "plebeian" Evening Standard.

The funeral of King George V took place on January 28 and he was interred at Windsor Castle.

The reason for his action, which Dawson frankly admits in his diary, was to ensure that the announcement of the king's death should appear first in the morning edition of The Times and not in some lesser publication later in the day. To make doubly sure that this would happen Dawson telephoned his wife in London asking her to let The Times know when the announcement was imminent.

There was a little doggerel verse that was very popular back then:

Lord Dawson of Penn/ Killed many men./ That's why we sing/ 'God Save the King'.

After the timely demise of King George V, Edward, the Prince of Wales, was next in line to the throne.

1936 was the year of the 3 kings!!

1936 was indeed a fateful year for the British Empire because it was the year of the 3 kings. People are familiar with the tale of the 3 kings from the Christmas story but it was nothing like that.

In 1936, the new king of the British Empire, Edward VIII, abdicated his throne to marry Wallis Simpson–the MAN he loved.

Wallis lost nothing by the king's abdication because she/he was a "queen" already!!

When the Duchess was asked why she/he didn't have children, her reply was that "the Duke is not heir conditioned."

At precisely 10 p.m. on December 10, 1936, King Edward made his famous abdication speech. The 42-year-old king was the most eligible bachelor in the world and could have chosen any woman to be his queen.

The king told the British people via radio that he could not continue to be king without the "woman" he loved.

In reality, the 40-year-old Simpson could not pass the sex check examination to determine if she/he could produce heirs to the throne.

The king's abdication speech was broadcast via radio to the 4 corners of the flat earth.

Immediately after the abdication, the king settled his affairs in England and departed for Austria on the destroyer HMS Fury. From now on he would be known as His Royal Highness, the Duke of Windsor.

Albert, Duke of York, was next in line to the throne. He never dreamed that he would be king because he had serious mental and physical disabilities. He also had a very bad stutter and dreaded any kind of public speaking.

King George VI was the World War II king.

According to Marion Crawford, the Twins' governess, he liked to spend his evenings doing NEEDLEWORK!!

How could a man like that stand up to Churchill and Hitler?

Queen Elizabeth was the wife of King George and the mother of the Twins.

Here is a quote from a memoir of the Twins' governess:

The Duke and Duchess rarely dined out. At evening, the happy bath hour over, the children bedded and the day's work done, they would sit one on each side of the fireplace like any other young married couple, happy in each other, not requiring any outside diversion. The Duke was astonishingly expert with a needle. He once made a dozen chair covers in petit point for Royal Lodge. I remember he got rather tired of filling in the background, so I obliged and let him go on with the more amusing part of the design. (Crawford, The Little Princesses, p. 45).

Imagine Winston "Bulldog" Churchill walking in on him doing petit point in Buckingham Palace.

The last photo of King George VI was taken at Heathrow Airport on January 31.

The King was feeling fine and spent the next week hunting at Sandringham.

Here is a quote from an authorized biography of the Twins:

He died, suddenly and without warning, of a thrombosis in his sleep at Sandringham, just six days later, in the early hours of 6 February 1952. His daughter became Queen in Kenya as she sat on the platform of the Treetops Hotel in the branches of a giant wild fig tree watching and photographing the animals at the salt-lick. (Bradford, Elizabeth, p. 165).

Sir John Weir was the personal physician to several monarchs. He was the man most likely to prepare the poison cup for the king.

Sir John Weir was personal physician to the king and ideally situated to prepare the poison cup.

Sir Harold Campbell was the king's equerry and ideally situated to present the poison cup.

Lilibet was totally prepared for that event because her private secretary had the accession papers with him in South Africa.

Lilibet was expecting the timely death of the king and she never shed a single tear:

Queen Elizabeth's response to her father's death was remarkably controlled. When Martin Charteris reached Sagan Lodge on 6 February 1952 to start discussing the practicalities of accession, he found the couple alone together, with Philip lying back on the sofa, holding The Times over his face as a shield. The new queen's cheeks were a little flushed, but there was no sign of tears (Lacey, Monarch: The Life and Reign of Elizabeth II, p. 173).

After the customary year of "mourning" the king's death, Lilibet was crowned as Queen Elizabeth II on June 2, 1953.

The coronation of 25-year-old Lilibet took place in Westminster Abbey on June 2, 1953.

Initially, the BBC was banned from filming the ceremony but that ban was lifted when they agreed that there would be no close-up filming.

Thanks to the communications revolution, the wedding was broadcast live via TV to the 4 corners of the flat earth.

Over 8,000 guests from all over the Empire attended the ceremony. General George Marshall, the U.S. Secretary of State who implemented the Marshall plan, represented the United States. The coronation was the first major international event to be broadcast live on television.

Clyde Lewis #conspiracy #crackpot #magick groundzeromedia.org

In the span of human history, we have seen on many occasions events that have changed the way mankind conducts its affairs. However, we have never lived in those times until now. Most of us have only read about them and romanticized the events as prophetic, epic, and miraculous to name a few overused adjectives.

The events that have transpired in the world have certainly caused people to open their bibles, read about Nostradamus and fawn over the likes of Edgar Casey or Sylvia Brown.

I know that in times like these, it is easy to make up your mind that we are definitely in the end times. The question is now that the domino has been pushed, how many years will we have to endure the suffering that leads to the inevitable end.?

Will it be as the Christians, Muslims and Jews have been prophesying or will it be more akin to an alien invasion as viral videos on the internet are showing strange UFO’ hovering around the sun and the moon?

The plague has certainly crippled us and in the times of Passover, it seems that when this subsides there will be a moment when the people will eventually take the plague to the pharaohs.

This again is an inevitable result of scarcity and famine.

There is a comet that we are seeing in the heaven’s that will be bright as the crescent moon. It has certainly earned its position as an omen to nations as it passes through four constellations on its trip to the sun. Some see it as a candidate for the prophecy of Wormwood, the star that turns the world bitter and poison the oceans.

Wormwood is also supposed to cross through four different constellations. Those constellations are nicknamed the Four Horseman of the Apocalypse.

Sagittarius is the rider of the White Horse. The Black Horse is Libra, and the Red is Scorpio. Ophiuchus represents the Pale Horse of prophecy and with his arrival comes pestilence and death.

Later he represents the healer who raises the dead.

We will also see the rise of the full Pink Moon – another omen that some are claiming strikes a chord with end of the world thinkers.

A Pink Moon is the rare result of several space phenomena occurring at once.

The name is slightly deceiving because the lunar surface will appear slightly orange rather than pink.

A Pink Moon is a type of Super Moon, which occurs when a new or full Moon is unusually close to Earth.

According to NASA, April’s Pink Moon will be the “most super” of the full Super Moons this year.

It will be the Passover moon as it casts its eerie glow and will signal the advent of Easter.

In the Hebrew lunisolar calendar, the months change with the new Moon and full Moons fall in the middle of the lunar months.

This full Moon is in the middle of Nisan.

According to many Rabbi’s, the Moon becoming as large as the Sun is an “injustice” to God.

On Wednesday night, Jews around the world will be gathering at home for the Passover Seder ceremony first performed 3,333 years ago on the night before the Israelites left Egypt. One part of the ceremony requires opening the front door and inviting all who are hungry to enter.

When the door opens there will be the omen moon.

This will be the second month in a row that features a Supermoon. Last month, a Supermoon appeared on the holiday of Purim another Jewish holiday.

The vigintriplicity or rather the fourth paring power of 3 in the year is not lost on those who are seeing this as end times symbolism.

Vigintitriplicity, (awareness of Triple numbers or multiple groups of numbers ) is a corollary to Carl. Jung’s Principle of Synchronicity and has an uncanny tendency to cluster seemingly unrelated “facts:” into strange, and meaningful patterns. For some reason, as yet undetermined, there operates in the human unconscious, an ordering principle which manifests itself through triplicate number patterns.

Shlomo #racist revieweddeception.blogspot.com

How to Recognize a Jew
Most "big bad Whites" were and are actually Jews, most of them being secret Jews.
The first part explained will be physical features of the Jews. Remember that there are lots of Gentiles who have some of these features, so always put everything together before making a judgment, which includes name and character. The name, however, is only a clue, as the Jew is apt to change his name to counterfeit the resident flock; as an example, Jews in North America and England - especially Jews in noticeable roles such as marketing and finance, politics, pornography, etc. - often have surnames such as Smith, Thomas, Williams, Lewis, Taylor, Miller, Johnson, Jones, Adams, etc.
1. The most overlooked physical trait is the widow's peak as seen below.

Paul Ryan, Jew

Arthur Miller, Jew

Norma Jeane Mortensen (Marilyn Monroe), Jew

On t.v., movies, newspapers and magazines all of the supposed blonde Whites viewers see are Jews - most of them dyed blondes, and the occasional natural blonde which comes from the Jews' cross-breed ancestry. The Jews are a mixture of races (by this some do question whether the Jews form a distinct race, considering that their pedigree is a mongrel one to begin with) and therefore they possess the most disgusting traits, with the various European - including the so-called Mediterranean, East-Baltic, Nordic, Alpine, and Dinaric sub-races - in addition to the Araboid, Hamitoid, Armenoid, Mongoloid, and Negroid races characteristic of their make-up.

Marissa Mayer of Yahoo and Larry Page of Google, Jews

The hair of the Jews is usually dark and curly. This comes from the Negro blood, which all Jews have. Mayer's husband, Zachary Brogue, is an exemplary dark, curly-haired, low-forehead Jew.
Disharmonics are the key to recognition, such as curly-haired blond Jews with too-wide mouths, or many of their grotesque hooked noses flanked by slanting blue eyes.

Karl Marx, Jew

Brian Levin, Jew

Benedito de Espinoza, Jew. Those who have studied Jews' names, including the names of the African slave traders know that many Jews have Spanish and Italian names, and that many Spaniards, Portuguese, modern Greeks, and South Italians look like Jews. The Jews - mostly Sephardic Maranos - possessed the slave trade.

Angelo Buono, Jew

Al Capone, Jew

Italy was a Jews haven after Spain and Portugal expelled many clerical Jews in 1492. For thousands of years, Jews have lived in Southern Europe, and members of the so-called Italian Mafia are not Europeans, but rather descendants of Jews and slaves from the Mediterranean.
As part of the Spanish Inquisition, the king and queen of Spain, Ferdinand and Isabella, signed an edict which left most Jews with three choices: To leave, convert, or execution. Sicily belonged to Spain, and it was governed by Viceroy Don Ferdinand de Acugna; thus, Jews living in Sicily were also affected by this edict. Jews had already blended into the Spanish Gothic gentry and introduced their religion as Christianity before 1492. The Gothic nobility of Spain was innocent of the knowledge that a Jew can be an atheist or be of any religion and still be considered a Jew, and that Jews had already infested the slave trade, crime organizations, the monetary system and the lawmaking bodies.
While many Jews stayed in Spain and Portugal and converted to Christianity, the fleeing Jews went to various places - among them Holland and Italy. Al Capone’s physiognomy alone suggests he was a Jew. High-ranking Mafia crime families Bonnano, the Gambinos, Romanos, and the Colombos, are all of Jewish blood. The photographs of Gambino, Luciano, and Genovese would indicate Jewish blood. Meyer Lansky once jested that he and Charles Luciano got along together so well because Luciano thought like a Jew. The Pope’s policy of Forced Conversion led to thousands of Jews in Italy and Sicily becoming Christians. Jews have lived in South Italy from the days of the Persian Empire. Indeed, in 1400 Southern and South-Central Italy and Sicily, an estimated 30-50% of the entire people were Jews. Jews inhabited Italy since the days of Ancient Greece in small numbers. By the time the Mohammedans overtook Sicily in the 800's, Jews had lived in Sicily for 1000 years. Most Spaniards, Portuguese, modern Greeks, and South Italians are not White. Nor are the peoples of Southern Europe by any means of the same hereditary value as in Ancient times, having mixed with Jews, Arabs, Egyptians, Syrians, Turks, and other ethnicities of an inferior racial and genetic quality.

Girolamo Savonarola, Christian preacher and reformer, Jew. Severely low, slanting forehead, hooked nose, thick lips and eyebrows, high cheekbones, heavy jaw.

George W. Bush, Marano (Sephardic) Jew

Early portrait of George W. Bush, in which the common traits of his tribe are more noticeable.

Pietro de Silva, Jew

Ted Bundy, Jew

Aníbal Cavaco Silva, Jew

Jared Fogle, Jew

Emeril Lagasse, Jew

2. Attached earlobes: The ears of a Jew are often very large and low-set. They can best be described as similar to those of a rat.

Franz Kafka, Jew

Gwyneth Paltrow, Jew

Barbra Streisand, Jew

Barack Obama, Jew. The large ears, woolly dark hair, thick eyebrows, thick lips and low forehead were a giveaway from the beginning - but again, since every Jew has Negroid ancestry, the Jews have best been able to disguise within the African body.

3. Chins:


There are two chins most common among Jews. The above specimen has a feeble, receding chin.
Jews in t.v. and magazines tend to have pointed but weak chins. The specimen below has the heavy jaw - complete with thick lips and high cheekbones - traits which come from the Jews' mongrel ancestry, and which are popularized in the Jews' fashion market.

Angelina Jolie, Jew

4. Jewish lips are usually thick, with the lower lip often protruding.

Lisa Rinna, Jew

Megan Fox, Jew, photograph before surgical and cosmetic enhancement. Her surname is an adaptation of Fuchs (Fox in Yiddish). This photograph was taken when she was sixteen years old. Does she exhibit mongrelized Jewish features? Yes. The arched eyebrows, the lizard eyes, the narrow forehead, the full lips and the broad cheekbones.

Scarlett Johansson, half-Jew playing the role as Nordic woman.


5. Another obvious feature is the low, slanting forehead which is common among Jews as well.

Adolf Hitler, Jew. Short, angled neck. Dramatically low, slanting forehead. Heavy superorbital ridges. Thick eyelids. Ugly nose. Broad cheekbones. Dark hair. Ears of a rat. In combination, these traits add up certainly to a Jew.

Benito Mussolini, Jew, early mugshot in prison. Looking at this picture of grotesquerie, it's easy to see why there are so few close-up portraits of his face: Lips very thick (this alone excludes him from European status), eyelids thick, hair and eyes dark, jaw heavy, cheekbones broad, forehead low and slanting, back of the head flat.

Francisco Franco, Jew

Ante Pavelic, Jew

Emperor Hirohito, Jew

Joseph Dzhugashvili Stalin, Jew

Vladimir Putin, Jew

Zac Efron: Mischling Jew playing the role as White man. The low forehead, thick, dark eyebrows and full lips are clues.

Pat Buchanan: another Jew promoting the falsehood that "the problem is 'Israel' and the 'Zionists', not all Jews". Low forehead, dark hair, slanting dark eyes, broad cheekbones, convex nose, thin upper lip, ears of a rat.


David Beckham, "English" Jew. The most "White-looking" Jews are in Western Europe, where the Jews have been selectively breeding with Whites since the 19th century, and choose those Jews whose mongrel blood more often expresses White physical features to be athletes, doctors, politicians, lawmakers, actors, fashion models, etc. pretending to be White.

Tim Marlow, art commentator, Jew. Tim Marlow's career is an additional Jews-clue. Most of the Gentiles in dubious industries such as law, fashion, theater, psychology, print and electronic advertising, pharmaceuticals, art, journalism, sexual counseling, and so on are NOT Gentiles. They are Jews disguising as Gentiles. Being of cross-breed descent, the Jews incline primarily toward those careers that involve the domination and exploitation of peoples. All of these Jews have been employed to deceive us.

Bertrand Russell, Jew
Like most Jews, Russell had a family history of mental disorders, which included psychosis. He also was an atheist, and he wrote in his autobiography that his two main interests were religion and sex. He was another Jew who was an atheist and who had an obsession with religion and sex.
6. High and flat back of the head: This feature is often easier to pick up on if you spot the slanting head first.

Ludovico Sforza, diplomatist, patron of Leonardo, regent (1480-94) and duke of Milan (1494-98), Jew

Theodore Rosenfelt (Roosevelt), Jew

David Barger, Jew

Lancelot Ware, Jew

Ware was a lawyer - a clue. He was also the co-founder of Mensa, an elite society of people whose IQ's are among the top 2% in the world.

Edward Snowden, Jew

Skull of a fetus of Jewish lineage.

The high back of the head, just like many other traits frequently found among Jews, is very common in premeditative criminals and habitual liars.


Jews are more likely to bald as they age and their hairline recedes, giving the impression of a high forehead in frontal aspect. This false peculiarity is amplified by the high back of the head.

Francois-Marie Arouet (fake name "Voltaire", who also adopted the name "Rabbi Akib" at a later age), Jew.

Yes, Arouet was another name-changing Jew, and this is clued by his physical traits (an article will be published describing his deceitful life so as to confirm this claim). He did not "look like" a Jew, did he? Has not "Voltaire" been painted as an "antisemite"? Has Arouet not done more "good" for the world than "bad"? His forehead seems high, doesn't it? That's because a fellow Jew painted that portrait of him.

A side view of the death mask of Arouet ("Voltaire") shows his deformed head structure. The plaster moulding of his face displays a very low forehead and a slanting, high back of the head, with the great mass of the brain located in the animal region. That's the head shape of a criminal - the same case for most Jews.

Alan de Botton, Jew

Louis Sachar, Judeo-indoctrinating children's writer

Marc Randolph, Jew

Randolph co-founded the propaganda streaming service Netflix.
7. The most well-known feature is the convex nose.

Do not forget, with the vast wealth the Jews possess, many opt for plastic surgery in reducing the size of and changing the hooked shape of their noses. Also note, of course, that not all Jews have this nose shape. "Ashkenazi Jews", who generally have more of the Armenoid blood, from which this kind of nose among the Jews is largely derived, are more prone to have this nose type.
8. Thick eyelids: The Jews' eyelids are mostly thicker and more fleshy than ours. Their look is wary and piercing. One can tell from the eyes that the Jews are a deceitful people.

David Berkowitz, Jew

Elie Wiesel, Holocaust® survivor

Edward Goldenburg, Jew

Golda Meyerson, Jew

9. The arms and legs of a Jew are often very short. The body height of the Jews is usually large in proportion to the legs. Many Jews have bow-legs and flat feet. These qualities are result of the Jews' Mongoloid infusion.
On the stature of the Jews: It must be borne in mind that differences in human height are far more influenced by a subject's environment than other attributes hitherto mentioned. A much more thorough examination of the genetic disposition of the Jews can be treated through the shape, dimensions, and measurements of the cranium.
Other traits:
One can recognize a Jew from his movements and behavior. His voice is often high pitched and he tends to speak through his nose. We hear this very often in the debates and oral arguments on television.


The Jew has a very strong inclination to argue, and to lie, as well as to twist and pervert the facts, when they are presented in his disfavor. The Jew is a master of telling lies, and of twisting the truth in matters to his own convenience.


The Jew is extremely deceptive. The Jew's languishing desire for "empathy" (which is a term invented by the Jews) is unrivaled. The Jew is an unceasing beggar of empathy and plays the role of the eternal sufferer in order to gain the favor of others. The immense number of Jews one sees within the fields of politics, education, advertising, promotional marketing, psychology, theater, and other positions of authority, testifies to the Jew's fixation with controlling and exploiting the minds of the peoples of the land in which he resides.

The Jew often has a strong preoccupation with sexual intercourse, and other ill-bred or generally repulsive topics - hence, the extremely high prevalence of Jews within fields that involve allusions or references to these topics, such as gynecology, sexology, sexual therapy, and so forth.
The Jews often move their hands and head when speaking. They often have a shift or uncertain gait.

The Jew has endless genetic afflictions. Among Jews, genetic mental retardation (or "autism", as the Jews call it) is disproportionately common. Jews suffer from mental illnesses in very high proportion to their population. For example, obsessive-compulsive disorder, bipolar disorder, histrionic disorder (a type of disorder involving excessive exaggeration, make-believe and a general inclination towards deception), and psychotic disorders such as schizophrenia, are rampant among Jews.

GoldenPrinceofBangXF #sexist reddit.com

LMFAO, AF in Vancouver are like AF anywhere - generally white worshiping, 3rd rate mates for AM. That said, the XF in Vancouver LOVE the golden cock. I have many first hand experiences in this regard. Vancouver is a fucking paradise for AM who have their shit together. I've never been eye fucked as much as I was in Vancouver by absolute model-tier XF. The approaches were so damned easy holy shit.

One prime example is when I was chilling on a park bench, some top-tier babe sits on the other side, then gradually snuggles up to me. Looks at me in the eye. The most blatant approach invitation I've ever received in public. So, damned, easy.

Vancouver is golden for the golden man. But if you're just a typical AM stereotype, it'll be shit for you, just like it'll be shit for you everywhere lol.

AF in Vancouver were easy af for me as well, but the quality was pretty low. There's a ton of immigrants from Hong Kong there, and they're not exactly top-tier for the most part. Very few AF in Vancouver with strong, northeast Asian phenotypes (tall, lean, strong looking, rather than short, flat, and pudgy).

Snuggles #fundie sluthate.com

the one thing that amazes me that there don´t seem to be any exceptions at all.

Literally every woman I´ve ever met (hundreds) has behaved exactly the way this site preaches. I haven´t found a single exception.

- cheating on bf with a better looking guy
- being mean to ugly guys
- obsessing about good looking guys
- teasing male orbiters with dangling their pussy in front of them
- using Sub8 men for money, work etc...
- trying to avoid confrontation by putting on a fake nice persona
- herd menatlity (other girls hate that guy so I must also hate him)
- delaying sex for looksmatched guys, but having ONS with slayers

Literally every woman I´ve ever met has been guilty of atleast one of the points mentioned above

Homo-Erectuss #sexist reddit.com

[UNPOPULAR OPINION] Incels don't need to get a gf or to "ascend", they need a healthy lifestyle structure to fill in the social gaps and improve their mental health

IMO, there is no such thing as "ascending". Women in 2019 DO NOT love you and never will, they don't even love chads now a days. They wont be loyal, they wont not cheat, they will still fish for attention with half naked pics on Instagram for chads. This is why we say AWALT, when you have the scientific blackpilled understanding of sexuality and dating you will understand how hypergamy and social media/tinder/societal expectations of promiscuity all coincide to create a population of people who get unlimited attention and sex with all the mental consequences of such (daddy issues, arrogance, snobbery, hating low value men, etc). Fact is that dating any of these women long term is a terrible idea, as you are and will always be a low value male to some extent. If you do manage to "ascend" your gf will either demand to open up the relationship, or cheat on you, or monkey branch off you to the next guy. There is no winning in America in 2019.

Instead, IMO, we need healthy structure in life that can improve our mental health and well being, all while understanding our place in society and the course of a society that chooses to go down this path. A lot of people here will say "just rope" but I disagree. We are human animals, survival is in our instinct, and i'm gonna assume a majority of people here don't want to kill themselves and want to see their lives improved. The specifics of such is up to you, but over the past two years I basically dedicated myself to improving my mental health and my life in general. I moved to a bigger city with a lot of job opportunities after college, I got a decent job with flexible work hours (it pays ok but I'd much rather have more free time than more money). I have a close knit group of friends who are nerds just like me, and i'm in the best shape ive ever been.

And Im still an incel virgin, and I still struggle with loneliness and wanting romance sometimes. Im obviously not trying to brag or trying to say that doing these things will make your life complete, just that itll make it better. That feeling will always come about. But whats the alternative? Is it to go MGTOW (and cope into thinking that eating shitty food and "your going your own way" rather than mstow)? Is it to marry a chad widowed roastie who will divorce you and take your shit? Is it to become a soyboy and be the cuck in a relationship? What is it? If you would rather kill yourself, it is ultimately your life there is nothing I can do about it but for the 90% who would rather survive I implore you to atleast try to live an alternative lifestyle (and by that i mean don't wageslave 40 hrs a week every week for a job u hate) and bring some positive elements into your life so that you (mostly) don't need women.

Dating a female in 2019 will not fix your problems and will in fact create more.

Also, if your interested in this type of thinking check out r/the_graypill if your blackpilled but not nihilistic or autistic about it like on larpers.co.

David J. Stewart #fundie #conspiracy #sexist #homophobia #kinkshaming jesusisprecious.org

The Luciferian elite have a secret agenda to destroy America. With 139,000,000 subscribers as of 2019, you can bet that the Devil and Luciferians behind the subversion of the United States are going to take advantage of Netflix, who have openly been promoting all manner of homosexuality, incest, sexual immorality, pedophilia, fornication, bondage and sadomasochism, vulgarity, potty humor, filthy talk, uncleanliness, adultery and unholy filth. When Netflix makes a film or series, all they want you to see is the sexual immorality. To say that Netflix is over-the-top is an understatement! The scenes that are becoming prevalent on Netflix today were considered hard core porn 25 years ago! The owners of Netflix belong in prison. God is going to cast them into the Lake of Fire!!!

The ungodly devils behind Netflix fully understand that it is human nature to watch the worst of what is set before them. Only a self-deceived liar and fool would sign up for Netflix thinking that they'll only watch the good movies, because the whole purpose of Netflix is to continually push the limit, introducing raunchier, more gore and more violence, until the viewer is submersed in total Satanism! Lesbianism is epidemic on Netflix! Hell is coming up to meet them when they leave this life. Netflix is pulling on the same rope as the Devil, preparing Americans for the coming Man of Sin, the Antichrist.

The United States is going straight to Hell. Our beaches are filled with naked sluts. All across America the nightclubs, casinos and taverns are filled with ungodly sinners who do not fear God. SIN CITY Las Vegas is our nation's legacy! Our founding fathers warned us about the dangers of scum like Netflix...

“I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just; that His justice cannot sleep forever.” —Thomas Jefferson, U.S. President 1801-1809

“We have not government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” —U.S. President John Adams

Netflix's movies regularly takes the Lord's name in vain, portray Christians as cults and nutcases, and desecrate everything that is right and holy. Netflix glorifies all manner of sin and wickedness! Judgment Day is coming for America, read Revelation chapter 18.

Light of my Little Left Eye #crackpot #fundie godlikeproductions.com

The Lilith Lie

From what I have gathered, many of you think of the WoS as an evil temptress consort to the nobody.

Does this remind you of anyone else...?
I cannot help but remember that God felt the same way about Lilith, and cast her out.

She was despised, and is often considered the consort of Lucifer.
The thing is, the Anomally is Lucifer himself.

Redemption is the theme of the new aeon, the word that has been forgotten and lost and which crowley failed to declare.

If lucifer struggles to be redeemed to the zeitgeist, Lilith struggles even moreso because she has been shunned, forgotten, and discarded.

Her secrets are so great, so deep, so unfathomally vast that consciousness cannot bear to even look upon her shadow.

@the cry of the third aethyr

There is a mocking voice: Thou art become immortal. Thou wouldst look upon the face of the Magician and thou hast not beheld him because of his Magick veils.

(Don't torture me!)

Thus are all they fallen into the power of Lilith, who have dared to look upon his face.

The shew-stone is all black and corrupt. O filth! filth! filth!

And this is her great blasphemy: that she hath taken the name of the First Aethyr24, and bound it on her brow, and added thereunto the shameless yod and the tau for the sign of the Cross.

She it is that squatteth upon the Crucifix, for the nastiness of her pleasure. So that they that worship Christ suck up her filth upon their tongues, and therefore their breaths stink25.

I was saved from that Horror by a black shining Triangle, with apex upwards26, that came upon the face of the sun.

And now the shew-stone is all clear and beautiful again.

The pure pale gold of a fair maiden's hair, and the green of her girdle, and the deep soft blue of her eyes.

Note. --- In this the gold is Kether, the blue is Chokmah, the green is Binah.

Thus she appeareth in the Aethyr, adorned with flowers and gems. It seems that she hath incarnated herself upon earth, and that she will appear manifest in a certain office in the Temple.

I have seen some picture like her face; I cannot think what picture. It is a piquant face, with smiling eyes and lips; the ears are small and pink, the complexion is fair, but not transparent; not as fair as one would expect from the hair and eyes. It is rather an impudent face, rather small, very pretty; the nose very slightly less than straight, well- proportioned, rather large nostrils. Full of vitality, the whole thing. Now very tall, rather slim and graceful; a good dancer.

There is another girl behind her, with sparkling eyes, mischievous, a smile showing beautiful white teeth; an ideal Spanish girl, but fair. Very vivacious. Only her head is visible, and now it is veiled by a black sun, casting forth dull rays of black and gold.

some incels #sexist reddit.com

Women openly admit that they have sex with Chad minutes after meeting him for the first time. But guys, you need to become friends with girls and court them for a long time before they agree to sex!

image

(SomeTurdInTheWind)
The more I read about women the more I think that eating pussy is a worthless, humiliating dumb thing for betas who cannot make women cum.

Studies: The number one factor by far determining wether women orgasm or not is their partners' physical attractiveness:

https://www.fpa.org.uk/sites/default/files/orgasms-in-women-an-online-survey.pdf

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886915001002

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/147470491401200507

This is NOT about technique, NOT about practice, NOT about dedication. This is about looking like a male model.

The male model who does not eat pussy or finger at all gives more orgasms to women than the regular guy who eats pussy and fingers.

(SorryBelt)
10 secs holy shit. Imagine the cuck LTR or marriage she's in now. I've seen some fucked shit like this being in a good frat.

How did fratmaxxing work for you?

Just fine honestly. Not like the movie portrays bait still crazy stuff happens. Really happens in college in general if you put yourself out there. I’m on the varsity water polo team so I got an auto bid from any house I wanted.

Good looking GDIs get laid way more than average frat guys if that’s what you’re asking too. They just don’t have access to girls like we do.

(bigantennaemay1)
I'm drunk right now, and in a state of mind where I don't want to believe the black pill, because it feels surreal. But I have to believe it, because it is fact. Life feels like a nightmare that there is no waking up from. But this is the reality. This is what foids are like. And they were never different; they only seemed better in the past as a cover up so they wouldn't face social scrutiny. What is even the point of going on anymore?

(evilcel)
I knew a girl in high school that told me about how she had sex, twice, with a guy 45 minutes after meeting him. Then again the next day.

Another girl I knew regularly had sex with guys she had met that night at parties.

Why the hell did I ever talk to girls? It's just brutal suifuel into a world vastly different from the one I live in.

(aPlaceToRest_)
Foids will hook up with chad within minutes while normie shave to jump hoops and dance like monkeys for years just to get chads sloppy seconds. ALPHA FUCKS BETA BUCKS NEVER FORGET THAT

(TObestcityinworld)
I don't take joy in anyone's misfortune but search for the thread "is anyone here over 35 and at absolute rock bottom" and look at the disaster most of them are...broke, couch-hopping, alcoholism/drug abuse, criminals, abusive/failed or lack of relationships, unemployed/unemployable, cheating partners, depressed, mental issues, debt issues.

There seems to be a few guys commenting there adding their story I have absolutely no idea why.

Cathy O'Brien #crackpot #conspiracy #wingnut stillnessinthestorm.com

Saying someone is ‘not one of us’ was common trigger phraseology that forbid I should have ‘any contact any time anywhere with anyone’ outside the cabal of New World Order Deep State perpeTraitors.

A Threat To The Deep State

Donald Trump was of deep concern to those shadow government criminals in control of my mind, our media, information, education, and justice system.

I had no ability to question or reason under mind control, or I would have wondered what it was about Trump that intimidated them so much that he was ‘forbidden’. Maybe they feared he had eyes to see, ears to hear, and soul to know that their criminal activity was draining our country and, in turn, was fully capable of draining their Wash DC swamp.

Today, people often ask me what I knew about Trump. Having never met him, perpeTraitors’ deep stated fear that ‘he’s not one of us’ says it all. Like everyone else, I am experiencing our President and his Administration’s accomplishments as we live through these pivotal times in history. I never thought I’d live to see the deeply entrenched swamp being drained, exposing the vast array of swamp creatures lurking in the murk.


Mark and I often pondered how dismantling the New World Order could possibly be accomplished and realized it would have to be a concerted effort on local, state, federal, and global levels. This would require a Great Awakening of biblical proportions since awareness is the first step toward positive necessary change.

David J. Stewart #conspiracy jesusisprecious.org

Something is very wrong with Donald Trump. Just days before the 2016 Presidential election, the FBI and NYPD went public with evidence that Hillary was involved in child sex crimes, child exploitation, perjury and kidnapping. Then they mysteriously decided not to prosecute her? What an obvious ploy to sway the election! Yet, Mr. Trump praised Hillary when he won the election. What kind of man praises a known satanist and child predator? Please watch the following shocking documentary about the Clinton's sex perversion and satanism. What Is The Illuminati? - Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5 | Part 6 | Part 7 | Part 8.

I hesitated to make any predictions, because it was really difficult for me to decide who would win. Albeit, I had my leanings toward Trump for two reasons: 1) The last time a Democrat was elected as U.S. President after a two term Democrat was in the year 1836; and 2) Historically, Republicans and Democrats always rotate back n' forth, so it was time for another Republican President. Check out how hilarious Hillary's supporters became upon hearing that she lost the election, crying like babies. Good, they lost their dyke lesbian fascist queen of Hell. Still, I think Mr. Trump is a slick deception, who ultimately will further the agendas of the Luciferian elite who are behind the satanic New World Order (NWO).

Pastor Jimenez rightfully exposes Mr. Trump as being covetous, vulgar and proud. Pastor Roger Jimenez Preaches About Why Donald Trump Is A Wolf In Sheep's Clothing!!! AMEN BROTHER JIMENEZ!!! It is obvious to me that Hillary Clinton was deliberately placed in competition with Donald Trump, so that nearly every Christian and evangelical in the United States would be overly thankful to have Trump as their leader instead of the likes of a devil like Hillary Clinton. Voting for the lesser of two evils sends a clear message to the Luciferian elite that they can continue to give us horrible candidates, because we'll vote for them every time, just as long as one is a little better than the other guy! If they give us Adolf Hitler and Jeffrey Dahmer, America's churches will vote for Adolf Hitler! The Clintons are known murderers, drug-traffickers, sex perverts, liars, opportunists, child predators and satanists!

Gregory Hood, Henry Wolff, and Paul Kersey #racist amren.com

The Great Replacement: New York City

This is the third in a series about the continuing disappearance of whites from American cities (see our earlier entries for Birmingham and Washington, D.C.). Many people still pretend that The Great Replacement is a myth or a conspiracy theory, but the graphs that accompany each article in this series prove them wrong. Every city has a different story but all have seen a dramatic replacement of whites by minorities.

It’s hard to believe that until 1980, New York City was overwhelmingly white — and it was traditionally conservative. Even during the Ellis Island period, it was a white city except for black Harlem. After the 1965 Immigration Act, the city turned multiracial and declined. Though it recovered in the 1990s and early 21st century, the white population is still declining, and the city is now a bastion of the far left.

New York started as New Amsterdam, a Dutch settlement seized by the English and renamed in 1664. The British controlled it for the entire period of the Revolutionary War; it was a loyalist stronghold. New York abstained in the critical independence vote on July 2, 1776. After the war, it was the headquarters for Andrew Hamilton and High Federalism. During the Civil War, many New Yorkers, especially working-class whites, sympathized with the Confederacy. Many blacks fled the city after the 1863 Draft Riots, and by 1865, there were fewer than 10,000 blacks left.

More than 12 million immigrants came through Ellis Island from 1892 to 1954. Almost all were white, though many were Italian, Eastern European, Jewish, or otherwise different from the Northern Europeans who founded the United States. This stopped after the 1924 Immigration Act, championed by Representative Albert Johnson. “It has become necessary that the United States cease to become an asylum,” he said. Today, the official House of Representatives website calls the bill a “legislative expression of the xenophobia, particularly towards eastern and southern European immigrants, that swept America in the decade of the 1920s.”

Of course, it wasn’t just migration from white nations that worried Americans. In 1910, central Harlem was about 10 percent black. By 1930, it was 70 percent black. By 1950, it was about 98 percent black, and Harlem was the center of American black cultural and intellectual life. It was also heavily leftist, with figures such as poet Langston Hughes and singer Paul Robeson supporting the Soviet Union and Joseph Stalin. In 1964, the Harlem race riot, which began after an off-duty police officer shot a black teenager, was the first major race riot of the decade.

However, Harlem was the exception, and the city stayed overwhelmingly white until after the 1965 Immigration Act, which opened the country to non-white countries. President Lyndon Johnson signed the bill on (Statue of) Liberty Island, with Ellis Island visible across the water. He claimed the bill would “strengthen us in a hundred unseen ways.” It didn’t.

After 1965, the Hispanic population grew and became more diverse. In the 1970s, Puerto Ricans were about 70 percent of Hispanics in the city, but now they are now less than a third. NYC’s Asian population has increased by 30 percent between 2000 and 2010.

When New York first started becoming heavily non-white, it entered a time of troubles, immortalized in films like 1976’s Taxi Driver. Many Americans remember the “Bronx is burning” incident, when a fire blazed just a few blocks away from Yankee Stadium during the World Series. Looting and violence during the 1977 power blackout showed that the city had almost no social capital. The filth and danger of 1970s became almost legendary. The 1992 AmRen article “The Late Great City of New York” paints a harrowing picture of the city at its worst.

But New York came back. Under mayors Rudy Giuliani and Michel Bloomberg, strict policing greatly reduced crime. Times Square, once a haven for peep shows and porn theatres, proudly hosts some of the most prestigious stores in the world. Scholar Heather MacDonald claimed in 2000 that the New York City Police Department was the “best urban police force” in the country. The city still has relatively low crime rates. Gentrification is transforming many neighborhoods, even Harlem.

Sadly, there’s trouble coming. Staten Island is the city’s one conservative and mostly white borough. Every other borough is majority non-white. Under far-left mayor Bill de Blasio, crime is increasing. Nonwhites have humiliated police by dumping water on them and vandalizing patrol cars. The coronavirus epidemic has hit New York state and city harder than any other region. When businesses shut down, burglars went to work.

New York city did not collapse when it lost its white majority. However, its revitalization was dependent on cutting the crime rate and stopping graffiti and public degeneracy. The current mayor, Bill de Blasio, has famously turned his back on the police. The city DA decided in 2018 to stop prosecuting subway turnstile hoppers, and in late 2019, there were unruly demonstrations calling for “No more cops” in the subway. Some of the old signs of collapse are back. Even the feared and hated squeegee men, whose elimination under Mayor Giuliani was widely seen as a crucial step back from the brink, have returned under the new mayor. Eliminating cash bail for many crimes means there are more criminals on the street.

These are changes that drive out the middle class, and for the first time in over a decade, the city is losing population (except for majority-white Staten Island.) Anyone who lived through New York City’s darkest days knows that civilization is fragile. Those days could come back.

David J. Stewart #fundie jesus-is-savior.com

Some of the most wicked places on earth today are health clubs. The music has become so disgusting and sexually graphic. Literally, the lyrics sing about oral sex, lasciviousness, lust, whorishness, fornication, feminism, homosexuality, et cetera. Women dress extremely immodestly and gyrate all over the place. It's not just a temptation for the men, lesbianism is epidemic these days. It's all evil to the core. Anything goes these days.

green---- #sexist reddit.com

How to torture a woman without talking.

Things needed:

A shirt and sweatpants preferably made of cotton, polyester and spandex.

Any tennis shoes, preferably old ones.

A gym membership or local park.

A shelf.

An ugly face.

Procedure: go against normie stereotypes and hit the gym. Put in lots of effort a few hours a day. Preferably some squats, deads, OHP, benches, and cardio. When you go home, put the smelly clothes back into the shelf, don't shower and then go back to the gym and repeat all steps.

Be sure to wear these smelly clothes during your everyday life. Remember, if you are a Chad, women don't care if you smell like shit.

"Attractive man pheromones are more attractive to women."

"Natural scent from a man with more testosterone is attractive. A little body odor is appealing"

Translation: you can smell bad if you are Chad.

All incels like myself needs to torture women by smelling bad on purpose in public. As long as you are ugly, it will work. It works for me.

Matt Forney #fundie mattforney.com

If you’re a girl pursuing anything more than a high school degree, you’re in all likelihood wasting your time.

Encouraging girls to go to college and grad school en masse is one of the biggest mistakes America has ever made. The flood of girls into universities is not only in part responsible for the current economic crisis, it’s made it increasingly difficult—if not impossible—for both girls and men to fulfill their natural roles. At the same time higher education has been degraded by so many unqualified girls getting accepted into college, those girls have seen their egos unjustifiably boosted by their degrees, making them unsuitable to be wives and mothers.

In order for society to be cured, this has to be fixed.

Here are my reasons why girls should be discouraged from going to college.
1. Going to college makes girls less attractive.

Girls, in their socially sanctioned solipsism, assume that men are turned on by the same things that they are. Because girls crave high status men, they assume that men similarly find their high status attractive, which couldn’t be further from the truth. No man alive has ever said, “God DAMN, I love the master’s degree on that girl!” It’s usually “God DAMN, she’s got a rack that could stop a runaway train!” or “God DAMN, this girl’s cooking is to die for!”

As a result, four plus years of college more often than not ruins a girl.

For starters, the extended adolescence that is college encourages sluttiness, which wrecks a girl all on its own. All those hunks splooging in her vagina make it more likely that she’ll end up divorcing the man she does end up marrying. Sluts are emotionally broken, incapable of loving and serving men, squandering their gifts of femininity and beauty, constantly trying to trade up for a bigger, better deal that never comes.

Marrying a slut is like paying full price for a beat-up old clunker.

Additionally, college is problematic because it gives girls the illusion of knowledge. Outside of STEM degrees (which are deficient in their own way), few majors actually impart useful information to girls, yet they still think they’re entitled to respect for having the degree; credentialism at its finest. Girls come out of college without being able to cook, sew, balance a checkbook or perform any of the necessary tasks of modern living, yet they still think they’re smart and independent and don’t you dare suggest otherwise. Don’t forget the massive amounts of student loan debt that these girls rack up, which you become in part responsible for if you’re dumb enough to put a ring on it.

Woman is not a learning animal.

The two most fulfilling relationships I’ve ever had were with girls who hadn’t yet graduated from college—one was midway through her degree and the other had not started yet—because they hadn’t had their minds poisoned by the lies of academia. They were fun to be around, girly, and eager to please. They hadn’t had their hearts broken through countless drunken hookups. When I explained something to them that they didn’t understand, they actually listened to me and did what I told them instead of accusing me of “mansplaining.”

If girls are like gold coins, sending them to college is like dunking them in nitric acid.
1a. Girls who go to college are extremely likely to get sexually assaulted.

Given the massive rape epidemic on college campuses, universities are massively unsafe places for girls. As feminists love reminding us, universities are ground zero for rape culture; one in four girls will be raped before the end of her college tenure. Given this information, why would anyone who cares about their daughter’s well-being let her do something as reckless as going to college?

You might as well parachute her into the worst part of Detroit with a “FREE FUCKTOY” sign taped to her back.
2. Most girls major in useless subjects that contribute nothing to the world.

Feminists love bragging about how girls are now earning the majority of college degrees, but they never bring up the fact that the majority of girls’ degrees are worthless in every way. Girls predominantly major in subjects like ethnic studies, women’s studies, English, communications and the like that require no work of any kind and give them no job prospects. As Aaron Clarey shows in this video, the majority of useful (STEM) degrees are still going to men.

What career prospects does a 22-year old girl with a bachelor’s in Arachnid Sexuality have? Dim ones.

If they’re lucky, they’ll end up becoming lawyers, civil servants or HR commissars, careers whose economic and social value is less than zero; those fields exist solely to employ the unemployable and leech off the productive. A select few might hit the jackpot and enter politics, where they can do an even better job of sucking our blood; Clarey showed in his book Worthless that the majority of American politicians have degrees in useless, parasitical subjects like law (Democrats more so than Republicans). But the vast majority of girls will end up living at home when they graduate, struggling to make their monthly student loan payments on a Starbucks salary.

Clearly, slaving away for minimum wage is way more fulfilling than being a wife and mother.

Furthermore, having all these girls “earning” these pointless degrees has lessened the value of a degree period. It’s common knowledge that the rarer something is, the more valuable it is. When our parents were our age, college degrees were uncommon enough that merely having one guaranteed you a good job, and you could secure most jobs with a one-hour interview. Now that everyone and their mother has a degree, employers cross-examine you like you’re on the witness stand, scrutinizing your GPA, your extracurriculars and making you complete stupid questionnaires that analyze how good of a “team player” you are, none of which has any bearing on how well you can do the job.

In their childish quest for “independence,” girls have made it more difficult for everyone—including themselves—to get a good-paying job.
3. Having girls working makes it more difficult for anyone to earn high wages.

It astounds me how so many feminists have absolutely no knowledge of economics. Here’s a hard lesson for you girls: labor is a commodity. And like all other commodities, labor is subject to the laws of supply and demand. When the supply of a commodity outpaces demand, its price (in this case, wages) goes down; when demand outpaces supply, the price goes up. This basic law is why a Walmart in Canton, Ohio is holding canned food drives for its own employees while the Walmart in Williston, North Dakota has to pay its workers $21 an hour and give them free hotel rooms; labor is plentiful in Ohio and scarce in North Dakota.

Leftists lament how wages have stagnated since the seventies and how the gap between the rich and poor has never been wider, but they can’t admit that feminism is a big reason why Americans are getting poorer by the day. The mass entry of girls into the workforce that began in the seventies conveniently coincides with the stagnation and decline of American wages, as well as the decline of unions. Whereas a man could comfortably support his family on his own back in the fifties and sixties, it takes both parents working to raise a family today, assuming the couple can even afford to buy a house and have children to begin with.

Additionally, the presence of girls in the labor force has feminized the economy and made it less productive as a whole. Because girls are unable and/or unwilling to actually take useful positions in the trades, manufacturing or other blue-collar fields (“Eww, I can’t mine coal! I might break a nail!”), the American economy had to be reconfigured to employ them somehow. The solution was to demonize the trades and create new useless white-collar positions such as “human resources.” Corporations used feminists as pawns to help promote outsourcing and free trade in the eighties/early nineties and push pointless office jobs as the new middle-class ideal. And all of those coveted white-collar jobs conveniently required a four-year degree, enriching the (leftist) universities as well.

As a result, we live in a country where a girl who makes $30,000 a year at a nonprofit is more highly regarded than an electrician who makes three times that.

Not only that, girls have altered the workplace itself for the worst. Government bureaucracies and other female-run institutions are governed by rules both written (e.g. sexual harassment laws) and unwritten that make it impossible to be frank, encouraging cattiness and backstabbing. And with few exceptions, female employees all act as volunteer commissars, ready to blow you in to the bossman the minute you upset their feeeeelings. You can’t be direct or honest because you never know what your co-workers will find offensive, making it difficult to get any work done.

But it gets worse than that: feminism is in part responsible for the current economic crisis.

It was girls’ desire for a never-ending supply of cheap crap (more than 80 percent of consumer spending is controlled by women) that resulted in the outsourcing of American manufacturing to China and the rise of big box stores like Walmart that squash local businesses and pay their workers the bare minimum allowed by law. It’s girls fornicating with wild abandon and divorcing their husbands on a whim that has lead to the epidemic of single moms and the subsequent strain on social services. It’s girls going to the doctor every time they get a boo-boo that has resulted in hard-working, healthy men like me having our insurance premiums skyrocket under Obamacare.

And it’s girls being unable to pay off their student loans that will lead to the next economic collapse.
4. Education (and work) are bad for girls’ physical and mental health.

It makes me laugh to see how effectively corporate America has made feminists into their most favored pets. Whenever feminists crow about the “end of men,” what they’re really saying is “Ha ha, we girls make WAY better slaves than you loser guys!” Jezebel and Gawker Media exemplify this contradiction best; all the girls writing there eagerly sound the gospel of female empowerment to make money for a man—Nick Denton—who pays them barely above minimum wage. “Yes Massa, Pax Dickinson is a misogynist racist asshat! Can I pretty please have a cookie, Massa?”

But beneath this you-go-grrl facade is a well of pain and suffering.

Despite all the feminists telling them that they should be happy to be “liberated,” female unhappiness is higher now than it’s ever been. Far more girls than men are suffering from mental illness, and antidepressant use among girls has gotten so bad that the drinking water of major cities like London is turning into a toxic soup. Every Strong, Independent Woman™ knows in her heart that her life is hell on Earth; it’s only her pride that keeps her from admitting the truth.

Recently, a friend of mine who quit her job to become a homemaker and returned to the workforce when her children grew older admitted to me that she preferred being a housewife. Why? It was less stressful. When she didn’t work, all she had to worry about was taking care of her kids, cooking and keeping the house clean. While she and her husband are wealthier now that they have two incomes, her life is never-ending misery. Her (female) boss constantly belittles and abuses her; her co-workers are gossipy do-nothings who refuse to pull their weight, making her pick up the slack; her health has deteriorated to the point where she’s developed stress-related carpal tunnel.

From the kitchen to the cubicle; isn’t freedom grand?

The reality is that girls always submit to men. It’s unavoidable. The only question is what kind of man she submits to. Will it be to a husband who protects her, provides for her and will love her until death do them part? Or will it be to a CEO like Nick Denton or some other corporate manager who views her as a tool to enrich himself, who will kick her to the curb as soon as she’s no longer useful? Even feminism itself is an invention of men, specifically Rousseau and the philosophers of the Enlightenment; Mary Wollstonecraft and other female “thinkers” were never more than sideshow freaks.

Deep inside, girls know what they want; they just need authoritative men to give it to them.

If you’re a girl, you should only go to college if you can meet one or more of these criteria:

Major in something useful. Here’s a pointer to figuring out if a degree is useful; does it involve math? If not, you’re wasting your time. I recommend Aaron Clarey’s Worthless if you want more info.
Go to a quality school. If you can’t make it into the Ivy League or another high-quality institution such as UVM or Binghamton, you have no business going to college.
Have your parents pay for it. I don’t mean co-signing your student loans, I mean having daddy take his wallet out and cover your costs in full. If you’re rich enough that your parents can afford college without any loans, it doesn’t much matter what you do.

The rest of you girls? We’re here to take you back to the place you secretly long to be, the place where you belong: the kitchen.

Now, on your knees!

Eric Crowley #sexist returnofkings.com

WHY PATRIARCHY IS THE GREATEST SOCIAL SYSTEM EVER CREATED

In the feminist creation myth, patriarchy is original sin. It is the Lucifer from which all evils flow. Without patriarchy, we would all live in a genderless role-less feminist garden of Eden.

However, just as the name Lucifer actually means light-bringer, patriarchy is actually an enlightening influence which has brought humanity out of the mud into civilization. Feminism only exists in the shadow of the massive abundance produced by patriarchy. Patriarchy is not the enemy. Patriarchy is the greatest social system ever created.

soarfrank

The Myth of Patriarchy
Feminists ascribe all social ills to patriarchy. Like a medieval inquisitor looking for evidence of the devil, patriarchy’s influence is supposedly all around us – our media, our schools, and even our most intimate relationships. Patriarchy is responsible for domestic violence, lost promotions, mean comments on twitter – even women’s own feeling about themselves.

Anyone who doesn’t subscribe to feminist dogma is believed to be possessed by the influence of patriarchy and in need of exorcism by an ordained Priest of the Cathedral of gender studies theory. They are forced to renounce their views, or face excommunication from the public sphere. In more honest times, the dominant religion simply called freethinkers “heretics” and burned them at the stake.

Origins Of Patriarchy
In reality, there is nothing so mysterious about patriarchy. Patriarchy is a division of social roles based in natural biological gender differences.

Males and females have very obvious self-evident biological differences. Women can have babies. Men cannot. Women’s bodies are designed for nurturing, with wombs, breasts, and hormonal cycles. During pregnancy, women are unable to physically exert themselves. Men’s bodies are designed for physical exertion, and as a whole, physically stronger.

Imagine you are part of a small tribe in a survival situation. Conquest, war, famine, death – any of the four horsemen could strike at any moment. How would you divide social roles?

As Jack Donovan states in The Way of Men:

Because your group is struggling to survive, every choice matters. If you give the wrong person the wrong job, that person could die, you could die, another person could die, or you could all die. Because of the differences between the sexes, the best person for jobs that involve exploring, hunting, fighting, building, or defending is usually going to be male. This is not some arbitrary cultural prejudice; it is the kind of vital strategic determination you need to keep your group alive.

frank_frazetta_tarzanandtheantmen-smaller

In other words, traditional roles are the basis of our survival as a species.

The Sacrifice Of Men
In patriarchy, men sacrifice their energy, their time, and sometimes even their lives for the betterment of women and children, and women give themselves to nurturing children and families.

Feminists define patriarchy as a system of dominance, in which men oppress women. This redefines men’s sacrifice as an act of control, rather than love. Many men are perfectly happy to have sex with women without offering any protection or value to the woman or her resulting children. It is an act of love that men willingly give up their freedom in order to provide for women, and their young.

Patriarchy is about love. It is about the love of human beings in families, tribes, and small communities working interdependently for the benefit of one another.

Feminism Was Created By Capitalism
Feminism in it’s modern form began in the last hundred years, when industrialization moved our economic survival from requiring hard labor to requiring skilled labor. Work used to require hours of physical lifting, now it requires sitting at a desk. This transition made it possible for even the weakest women to work.

Employees are much easier to manage as interchangeable cogs than as gendered individuals with unique needs. In fact, convincing women to work doubles the size of the work force, allowing employers to half everyone’s wages. It’s simple supply and demand. As the book Revolution From Above chronicles, early feminist movements – even Marxist feminists – were bankrolled by major capitalists in order to increase the workforce and lower wages.

CapitalismAndTheExploitationOfWomen

Feminism is a product of capitalism. The “you can have it all” message is an attempt by corporations to swindle women out of their biological needs. If you’re a feminist, you’re a capitalist, because you’ve make work a greater priority than community, children, or love.

In families, each member is irreplaceable, but in a company everyone is replaceable. In patriarchy, women toiled for one man who loved her and the children he gave her. In capitalism, women work for many men completely indifferent to her and willing to disposes of her the moment cheaper labor appears.

Feminism Commodifies Relationships
In patriarchy, selfish relationship impulses were restrained. In capitalism, they are encouraged. Each member of a tribe of community works for the benefit of those around him, but in capitalism men and women are independent agents, with no loyalty or duty to anyone else.

Roles that were traditionally played by family are now outsourced. Group homes for the elderly, day care for the children. Even mentors and friends can be bought in the form of therapists and life coaches.

This system destroys intimate relationships. It selfishly benefits a woman to bear the children of strong lone alpha’s rather than the man providing for her. It selfishly benefits a man to impregnate every available fertile woman with no intention of further contact. Alpha fucks, beta bucks.

Feminism has created a war between the sexes with each side trying to maximize their profits in the sexual marketplace while spending as little as possible. We’re all little atomized corporations united only by the laws of bio-mechanics.

steinberg_war-of-the-roses

Men Have Lost Reason To Work
This new dynamic has freed men from work. In his new book Bachelor Pad Economics, Aaron Clarey advocates a minimalist approach to money – buy only what your need and using your time for your benefit rather than a corporation’s. This approach is already being taken as men drop out of the system, earn less than women, and avoid higher eduction.

The reason men worked hard was to provide for their families. Men didn’t work long hours out of self-interest. They did so out of love. Most men can subsist on very little. It’s been said that civilization was created to impress the opposite gender. Without reward, there is no reason to work. No carrot, no jump.

As a society, we’ve reached a point where technology has eliminated the need for everyone to work. Just as capitalism freed women from their natural role, it’s freed men from theirs. Masculinity has been reduced to a fashion statement.

Return To The Natural Order
While we understand that animals exists in natural groups – a herd, a flock, a pack – we forget that man is an animal too. Man’s natural group is the tribe. Humans are mammals. We learn through relationships, rather than instinct.

Ajna-Nursing-Acorn-Community-Virginia-2006-650x486

Children require love, attachment, and stability that can only be found in emotional bonds with present adults. They are not interchangeable cogs. You can’t buy a mother’s love or a father’s wisdom. Love cannot be outsourced. Authentic love is only possible within patriarchal community.

To a company, non-working children are a nuisance. The epidemic of single motherhood, plummeting birthrates, and mental illness is due to the rejection of traditional roles. If society wants healthy happy children and loving stable communities, it must embrace the lost values of patriarchy.

In the early tribes, humans were entirely dependent on one another. Now they are independent and unsatisfied. Returning to traditional roles means living interdependently, and align with the natural order not because we have to, but because we choose to. We could exist alone, but we are fulfilled together.

Of course, feminists will call this oppressive. They want you to be free – free from community, free from belonging, free from love. A mass of apes fighting over the highest value mate behind a gilded cage.

ffleft

Back to the mud, or back to the kitchen, the choice is yours.

various WGTOWs #sexist reddit.com

Re: I think WGTOW and MGTOW have a *lot* more in common than both sides think, and I would argue that both group's fights are the same.

(fatfinger357)
I am quite satisfied and happy as a WGTOW but then the MGTOWs keep coming in to this sub and start brigading and hating on us. We are just women going our own way and these MGTOWs come here and they are not going their own way.
There is too much misogyny in MGTOW for there to be any peace. It is far better to just block them and shield them from life. It's far too risky to be with men, especially the MGTOW kind. Once they know you're a woman, the abuse and harassment is on you, and in real life men are more or less the same, trying to dominate you and take over and control you. It makes sense of course because men naturally produce testosterone, so that makes them violent and abusive, so it's not exactly their fault, but I feel as a woman it is safer to protect myself with WGTOW than bother with useless things like relationships.
Of course for a fat person, the "no pain no gain" principle applies. A fat person needs to eat fresh fruits and vegetables, high fiber, and they need to exercise a lot, and for a lot if people this is not easy, so they need to go through pain in order to reduce their risk of heart disease, stroke, diabetes, and cancer.
However, men are different. Men are not like losing weight. Losing weight actually achieves something. However, with men, if you put in a lot of effort to apply makeup and appease men and make them feel good and give them intimacy, then what do you get from them? Nothing. Most women spend so much time and effort on others than she neglects herself so that, as she grows up, she ends up with less wealth. I'd rather just focus on myself and do what I want rather than sacrifice myself for men. For too long women have sacrificed themselves for ungrateful men. We need to listen to what we want.

(violetreva)
That's where you're wrong! I'm sorry to disappoint you but this is a liberal fantasy and I have no intention of reassimilating into male society ever again. Women are not men. Men are not women. We are not in the same boat. Men oppress women. We do not belong together in any capacity. They can have mars and we can have venus, quite literally. Separatism FTW.

(day01x)
I was just thinking about this on reading a post in another WGTOW thread. One in particular mentioned that "men cannot conceive of a non-transactional relationship", and that everything is about "value" with them. This is the exact language used in MGTOW, too.
Men and women are 'valued' for different attributes, but they are both valued ruthlessly. You can debate the details of which particular group of people have it worse, and while that discussion may be worth having, that's not the point I want to make here.
I think what MGTOW and WGTOW have in common isn't just personal experience, it's a reaction to how brutally dehumanising society can be.
It's as though the idea of the "free market" has entered into sexual relationships. We've adopted the consumer mindset in our social lives. Social media and dating websites exacerbate this, but the mentality was developing long before. We ignore the substance of a person in favour of a good profile. We pay attention not to how they make us feel or think but on an abstract collective value, as though the only measure of their worth is how much others want them.
Think of the kind of relationships that would result from this setting. Imagine what happens to the people who don't, can't, or won't fit into that kind of environment.

(DangZagnut)
I don't hate women, I don't even hate feminism, not that I won't shit post about women or feminists posting outrageously bizarre things into the internet. I also do it with stupid men doing stupid things.
I just prefer to be by myself and traveling the world and having adventures, rather than marriage and children. Children smell and marriage seems like it limits everyone in that equation to a life of exceptional mediocrity.
I've never had a bad relationship. Sometimes they end, and in my relationships, maturely and with both sides realizing its time to move on and no hard feelings.
I encourage WGTOW to go their own way and not be bound by societal conventions. You don't have to be bitter to be WGTOW any more than you have to be hurt and bitter to be MGTOW. Sure, some come to a MGTOW conclusion because they've been hurt, and I'd wish they embraced it from a more positive place, but to each their own.
I don't see any "solution", because I don't really see any "problem" in the first place. To say that either of those exist implies that there's something inherently wrong with going your own way in life, and setting your own path to happiness.

(CasualPie)
There's a bit of difference between "I'm tired of the system because it sucks" and "I'm keeping the hell away from the system because it could legally ruin my life".
In your listing of the disaffected guys, you forgot to list the ones legally destroyed through divorce settlement, child custody arrangement, false rape/assault/abuse accusation, etc.
One of MGTOWs reasons for GTOWing isn't just that the game sucks, it's that the game is mortally dangerous and supported by the legal system.
Hunger games, relationship edition.
I am not disaffected by personal experience. I am MGTOW because of all of the failed, fucked up, and ruinous relationships I've seen in others.
Being in the army, I've seen countless relationships destroyed from women cheating and/or abusing their power of attorney while the guy is deployed. I've seen guys in college get thrown in jail for decades for hooking up with girls when they were both wasted drunk. I've heard countless guys complain that they can't do what they once loved doing because their SO/fiancée/wife doesn't like that they spend so much time on it, hell, my own mother is on her third marriage (I love my mom, but it's hard to believe in marriage when your own mother changes them out every 10-20 years)!
Worst of all, I've heard girls joke about this stuff. "Oh, if it sucks I can change my mind about it, I always have a few glasses of wine to loosen up", "if he breaks up with me I'll tell everyone he was abusive to me", "not paying attention to me is abuse right? : yeah it is!".
When society can casually joke about throwing people in jail over poor personal choices and changed minds, I will eagerly avoid it.

Christian purity #fundie answers.yahoo.com

[Creating a whole bunch of stereotypes and falsehoods about homosexuals]

they are lustful
they are against GOD.
they badly influence children by this
they aren't discreet in public with relationships
they act camp
they act like women rather than macho
they like expensive things and materialistic personalities.
if they want children that probably means they secretly want to be straight and with a woman.
they hire cleaners because they don't have a woman in their life to tidy their house
they sometimes don't know how to do house things like laundry because there is no woman there to show them how
they say it was genetic but if it was genetic then they'd be able to pinpoint the exact gene for it and do scientific testing for it before birth
they deny the clear factors that have an influence on sexuality like absent father figure and overbearing mother
they choose to sin and try to blame it on GOD
they say animals are homosexual which gives them a right to be but animals aren't aware of sin and can't choose not to sin. And animals also murder their young but that doesn't make it right for humans to do it.
they insult you just because you are a moral Christian who wants everyone to avoid sin and get to heaven
they are too involved with what they want to wear and look like.

Andrew Anglin #homophobia #racist #conspiracy dailystormer.name

[From "Nigeria: African Lesbianism Rises, Courtesy of George Soros"]

You’d think that the masses of people would have caught on to the fact that entertainment media is used to transform society by emotionally manipulating the population.

However, you would be wrong.

As a rule, any time you imagine the masses of people catching onto any fact that isn’t fed to them by the media, you will be wrong.

Africa @ Random

A pro lesbian Nollywood film created and directed by Uyaiedu Ikpe-Etim has is in the works and about to be released. The story is centred around the love interest between two queer women.

Uyaiedu said she created the movie to address the subject of LGBTQ head-on as it is more or less a taboo topic in Nigeria.

The title of the movie is “Ife” which translates to mean “love” in the Yoruba language, a dialect widely spoken in South Western Nigerian.

Uyaiedu said she made the movie as an opposition to the stereotypical way queer people were perceived in the Nigerian society as this also got transferred into movies where gay roles are often deemed to be troubled and problematic.

“I’m queer so ‘Ife’ is dear to my heart. I wanted to represent LGBTQ characters in a different light than how they are shown in past stories, to change how heterosexuals view them,” she explained.

Homophobia is a big thing in Nigeria and the larger parts of Africa. Stigma against homosexuals in Nigeria is particularly very pronounced considering that there are even laws in the country’s books that sentence gays and lesbians to long jail terms when caught and convicted.
[...]

Yes, the homosexual propaganda film is created by an NGO.

“Equality Hub.”

What is that, you ask?

If you go to their site, you find that they are a part of “The Initiative for Human Rights.”

If you go to their site, you find they’re just yet another subsidiary of George Soros’ Open Society Foundation. Of course.

They have other patrons, including Elton John’s AIDS group, but I’d wager the most money comes from Soros (sometimes it gets passed around in circles, and I would imagine Elton John’s AIDS thing is also funded by Soros).

Again you have whites and Jews from the West going to a third world country to force homosexuality on them.

Why?

Part of it is just basic comic book villainy, and a desire to destroy everything in the world by making it sick and gay. But a much more practical and immediate purpose for this, as I mentioned recently when I addressed Mexico going full homo, is the globalist agenda.

You see: right now, the first world is being turned into the third world, rapidly. We are being flooded with third worlders, we are dipping into gross, third world style political corruption, and we are headed into a situation where there is mass poverty, no middle class, and the impoverished peasants are ruled over by an ultra-rich elite.

At the same time, however, we are not adopting the one thing that the third world has that is actually admirable, which is traditional family values. We’re staying totally gay, we’re keeping feminism, divorce, the whole mess.

If we want to combine with the third world then, by tearing down the borders, they must first share the Western fixation on anal sex, female empowerment and the rest of the program as regards to these things. So, right now, you are witnessing a massive push to turn the third world gay, in preparation for this great merger of the nations into a single mass of gay brown sludge.

This is exactly what was written about in 1925 by the founder of the European project, Count Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi.

[...]

We need to be aware of the fact that the goal behind the coronavirus hoax and the ongoing communist revolution is create a one world government run by Jews that rules over a mass of brown homosexuals.

Gonzo #racist libertydwells.com

S Jackson has to play the stereotypical "angry black man" in damn near every movie he's payed MILLIONS OF DOLLARS (hear that Liberals, a Rich Black man!) to be in, and then he feels "victimized" when blacks are "stereotyped" as "angry". Typical Hollywired Liberal asshole.

I'm finally to the point where I'm ready to earn what Liberals want to make me.

I'm white, so I'm a racist, and because of that liberal belief, I've become what they said I was. I despise Barak Obama, and Samuel Jackhole, and Jessie Jackass, and Charlie Rump-Wrangler, and Louie Farrykan, and The THANKFULLY ROTTING CORPSE of Michael Jackson, and Al Race Pimp Daddy Sharpton, and all the rest of their darker kindred, FIRST AND FOREMOST, for the color of their skin.

I'm SICK of being called a "Racist" because their skin color is different than mine, therefore, I hate their f**king skin color!

If I could, i would eat white crayons for the rest of my life just so I don't have to have anything brown in my house. I would shit white turds, drink only white milk, eat only white bread, replace all wood in my house with metal or hard plastic, cover my yard with a concrete slab so no dirt shows. Switch from Budweiser to Heineken just so I can have green beer bottles instead of brown!

You want it, Liberal assholes, you got it. I'm the Racist you've always dreamed I would be. I hate you all, f**k off and die, preferably at MY hands you n**ger loving, fag sucking assholes!

moviemeister76, Cmae #fundie dailykos.com

What’s it doing on Instagram? Did Heather Lind bring it up with his caretakers first?

moviemeister76: So sexual assault victims need permission from their perpetrators before they speak about what happened?
That is not what I said at all. Stop engaging in the Republican strategy of deliberate misstatement. The reason to go public is when a private confrontation is ineffective. We cannot make starting with a public accusations (not just sexual ones) the norm just because easy outlets like Instagram exist. Soon people with a vendetta or simple maliciousness for whatever reason will start making false public accusations. If that has ever happened to you, you would know that a denial is useless. It is very difficult, and most of the time impossible, to prove a negative. People just start gossiping and you, though even if innocent, pay the price. Even if you win (as an acquaintance of mine did, even receiving a 6-figure settlement), you will probably have to move to another community. This is why our system says that people are innocent until PROVEN guilty.

If Heather Lind had gone privately to the caretaker (as it appears that Bush is no longer able to directly speak for himself) and received an apology, would she or should she go public? What would be the motivation to do so? Keeping quiet out of fear or because of hush money is one polar wrong. Blaring an accusation from the housetops is another polar wrong.


moviemeister76: You know what? Don’t you EVER tell me how I should deal with accusing the man who raped me. EVER. Victims have the fucking right to handle it however we fucking see fit. All you are doing is showing that you’re more concerned about being accused of sexual assault than the women who are sexually assaulted.
You know nothing about me. You don’t even know if I am a man or a woman. I was careful to point out that I am not limiting my remarks to sexual assault, but negative public accusations of all kinds. However, I am so glad no one has ever falsely publicly accused you of anything, that you have had the luxury of supposing that all negative accusations of any nature are prima facie true.

Cmae: More passive aggressive mansplaining.
Question: Is it still mansplaining if a woman wrote it? More likely you are attempting ad hominem—trying to discredit the person rather than engage the argument itself.

Cmae: Passive aggressive female misogny works too.
And yet there is no misogyny, male or female, in my comment. All I have said is there should be a “regular order” to making accusations of any kind. Otherwise, people will start making accusations of all sorts, and I have been careful to say, those accusations do not necessarily have to be sexual in nature to do real harm. You are also very close to the next step, presumption of guilt, rather than presumption of innocence. One reason police shoot unarmed black people more often than white people is the problem of presumption of guilt. I am arguing for consistency of approach.

I agree that too often society winks at sexual misconduct. Even on Dkos, many of the ads objectify women and all we hear are excuses about how Kos does not control the ads. Running headlong toward the polar opposite of presumptive guilt would be counterproductive. This is a true slippery slope. Note the comments. A number of people are ready to speculate all sorts of things about Bush.


moviemeister76: Dear God. Why is it whenever someone wants to defend something they wrote that was misogynistic or racist as hell, they always give us a multi-paragraph screed?
So instead of a refutation, you offer a restatement of your original assertion without anything to back it up except “misogynist” is the ad hominem du jour.

StraightShooter #fundie kiwifarms.net

It's actually a triple insult. It insults women by insinuating they have to be men to be athletic. It insults men by saying most of them cosplay as women if they want to be seen as female and sporty, and it insults the transgender by accusing any who fit that body type of BSing their gender to fit a stereotype.


1. It's a biological reality that excessive masculine behaviors in females and excessive feminine behaviors in males decrease sex appeal not just in humans but other species; beyond that people can do what they want, but if a woman decides to take steroids and put on 300 lbs of pure lean muscle mass, she shouldn't be suprised when she gets hit on by lesbians more than men, her choice.

Same with freaks who cross-dress - dress up like a woman and perpetuate your psychosis all you damn well want, but then don't expect anyone to do anything other than laugh when you go on Tumblr to whine about why you're a single virgin who gets called a "faggot" by all the guys in your grade.

It's one of the most bigoted and insensitive things anyone could argue in good faith if you ask me.

If reality is bigoted, then the problem's the denialists, not reality.

And the only "sensitivity" they really deserve is a bullet or a death camp, which ever's cheaper on the taxpayer.

Citizenfitz #racist realjewnews.com

The Twelve Stages of a Holohoax Tale

1. The survivor is put in a cattle car filled with hundreds of Jews and a poop bucket, and sent to the camp, usually Auschwitz. Many Jews die of suffocation, but none of thirst, since a Jew can survive for 3 years just on their own saliva.

2. The survivor stands in a line, to be chosen either for the gas chamber or the kitchen/orchestra/workshops. Close family members are always put in the other line. Even though all those under 16 are immediately gassed at Auschwitz, many young kids are sent to the work line.

3. The survivor comes face to face with Joseph Mengele himself, who decides to spare their life because Mengele had never seen a dancing Jew, a singing Jew, a Jew with no pimples, or a Jew who said they would work hard for him.

4. The survivor lives on a meager ration of 200-300 calories per day, including turnip heads/potato skins/excrement/grass soup/sawdust salami/human flesh, bones and hair/cat/rat/dog meat/mice/etc.

5. However they are still strong enough to work for the Germans, including making furniture/carpentry/electrician/plumber/V-2maker.

6. The survivor has some gold, diamonds or other jewelry hidden about their person, which they use to bribe the guards for favours, or pay for a visit to the camp brothel.

7. They are taken to the gas chambers, but miraculously escape at the last minute, evading the guards. All their friends are killed.

They witness other horrible atrocities, including babies burned alive in pits, geysers of Jewish blood spurting out of the ground, or people burned alive in the ovens when the gas chambers were too busy.

8. The survivor is then forced to take part in a ‘death march’ which never actually leads to death. Often the survivor runs away!

9. The survivor is then transferred to another camp, where they cheat death again. This may be repeated any number of times.

10. The survivor escapes, right under the guards’ noses, lives in the forest for a couple of years, then eventually emigrates to America/Britain/Australia/Israel although they have no friends, family or money.

Then the survivor buys a multinational corporation. They are the only member of their large family of 200 to survive, and weigh only 40-50 pounds when they are rescued.

11. For 60 years the survivor says nothing about his or her experiences. Then suddenly they can’t talk about anything else. They usually write a memoir called ‘Dancing to the Music of my Dreams - A Survivor’s Story’.

12. The survivor has now found peace, and spends the rest of his/her life telling their amazing story to schoolchildren. Only the very youngest ones, of course.

richard koshimizu #conspiracy www15.ocn.ne.jp

Adolf (Rothschild?) Hitler

1. Sponsors to Nazi and Hitler were Rothschild and other Jewish conglomerates.
2. Adolf Hitler's real grandfather was allegedly Barron Solomon Mayer Rothschild of Vienna.
3. Adolf Hitler greatly contributed to Zionist Organization by chasing European Jews out to Israel. Without Hitler, Israel never exist. Nazi must be regarded as a detached force of Zionist Jew.
4. Many of Nazi high officials are allegedly stealth (Invisible) Jewish including Bormann and Eichmann.
5. Hitler's Nazi did not kill even one Jew in gas chamber. Some 30,000 Jew instead of 6 million died of epidemics in the camp, but, was not intended by Hitler.
If Hitler is a direct descendant of Rothschild Dynasty, his life would have been well taken care of and he would be protected by Jewish community. He was not an enemy to Jewish. He was an capable Zionist. He was Father of Israel. So, Father of Israel can be fled to Argentina and protected by Jewish community rather than died in Bunker in 1945.
So, above title is nothing inconsistent. Truth can be found only when you are skeptical enough on what you call common sense and on what you were taught in the school. Please get into deep to know more about it and become one of first very few to reach the truth.
Hitler died in Berlin in 1945? No. He did not. U-boat took him to Argentina.
Did Adolf Hitler really commit suicide in bunker in Berlin on the day of fall of Third Reich? We are told Soviet troops found Hitler's body and buried somewhere in Berlin. Anyone saw it? Anyone checked its DNA to specify? Wasn't it a corpse of Hitler's double? (Hitler had a double of a close resemblance as witnessed by Angel Velasco.)
I understand Hitler did not die in Berlin and fled to Norway where he took U-boat to head for South America. According to Pravda of Russia, at least 5 U-boats have arrived at Argentina port with many of Nazi officials on board. This is the confirmed fact in history

POTP #fundie forum.nationstates.net

Whelp... What's next on the list? Let me look... Ah, here it is!
Gay "marriage" - check
Polygamy - next
Incest - getting there
Pedophilia - not yet but it's gonna happen sometime in the near future
Bestiality - long ways off but it'll happen

Un-Supreme Court is not final authority on marriage. God Almighty is. He clearly defined marriage as an institution between ONE MAN and ONE WOMAN. Satan and his minions have their victory for now. But the Kingdom is not theirs. The Lake of Fire is where they'll be residing for the rest of eternity.
I pray for this country. I pray for the religious that will inevitably be persecuted as result of this unholy decision. I pray for our children. I pray for the supporters of this decision. I pray for all "gays". I pray for ALL mankind. Lord Jesus come soon! We are ready! Save us from our sins!
Amen

[Pffftt.

I'm sorry, let me just- I need a second.

This is a fucking hilarious piece of satire, good sir. You've created the perfect stereotype of your typical, bigoted, god-fearing idiot.

At least, I dearly hope you're joking.]

Everything is satire with you people. You can't wrap your mind around the fact that SOMEONE might just happen to disagree with you. That's what all you liberals are like. I will be praying for you sir.

Valkyr #racist realjewnews.com

The Jews were behind the Holodomor starving of 10+ Million Ukrainians and were the same Jews behind the Soviet Bolshevik Revolution killing 60+ Million in the Soviet Union, and the murder of the Tsar’s family.

The Jews are the biggest mass murderers on the planet yet they have much of the world (Gentiles) brainwashed thinking that they are the poor victims.

We Gentiles are the victims. Real history confirms it. Terror, tyranny, and mass murder of Jewish-ruled Soviet Russia is an example of the Jewish plans for the entire world if their “New World Order” conspiracy comes to full fruition.

Anyone with a functional brain and a minimal amount of intelligence is capable of researching and figuring out it is indeed exactly this internationalist Jewish clique who owns all key positions in European society.

All the major banks, the media, big capitalist compagnies and with all their influence they pull the strings in politics, economy and even in the educational sector.

We are all treated as mere replaceable objects, as slaves by these ethnocentrist Jews who claim they are the chosen people of their Jewish god and others are to be used as cattle.

Well let me tell you something, the social situation has become so astoundingly depraved and decadent, whilst still these Jews HAVE THE NERVE to boast about their power and continue to push guilt complexes only on OUR White children with their complete LIES regarding the holocaust, that indeed people are bound to wake up to reality.

We Europeans need to pay Israel millions for something we are not even guilty of!? While these swines are butchering the Palestinians in Israel for almost a century now? Their hypocrisy has no limits.

Yet supposedly us Europeans are to blame? For what? Because Hitler was that much of a choir boy in treating the Jews excellently, as these Jews know damn well!

They had recreation facilities in Auschwitz, sportsfields and even a swimming pool when you look at the architectural plans of Auschwitz camp complex!

No single documents exist proving at all there was a deliberate plan of exterminating Jews. The Jews were one of the few races who ended up with a higher amount of people AFTER the war than before the war.

YET they have had the guts to use this holohoax lie propaganda to MURDER millions of INNOCENT Europeans on these basis. I can tell you this, We have not forgotten nor forgiven it.

Barrel9 #fundie reddit.com

Most of the White Men in WMAF relationships are the runts of the litter. They are the rejects of White society. They are the betas or the omega degenerates. It's very evident. Just look around. How can they pass on superior traits when they are deeply inferior? That's the primary reason why they have to resort to dating self-hating Asian females. Very few superior Alpha White men will settle for Asian women when they can have a knockout Caucasian or Latina model as a wife, a statuesque female with banging curves.
Asian Males who date XFs have to go out of their comfort zone and combat societal barriers and stereotypes, they are typically the AMOGs of the group. So obviously Alpha will Alpha in the end, and pass on their superior traits.

1111111111- #sexist reddit.com

Why does EVERY woman try to make us believe they are different? Why does EVERY woman try to convince us that they're not slutty or "not like the rest?"

Do other incels notice this shit too?

Women always try to somehow make people believe that they are not like the rest or they are not slutty.

Look at my experience when I was new to the sub, my first month here, I met a girl who wanted to have sex with me here and had long conversations. She said she's not slutty like incels stereotype, yet she cheats on her partner for years and with many people. Just LOL. Of course, I got ghosted because all women are sluts and sluts sleep with everyone except incels.

Around Christmas time, I posted on r/depression about how women are shallow and stuff. Most women got bitter and talked about my attitude. One girl agreed with the fact that most women are shallow, yet she tried to convince me about her "5'3 boyfriend" and how she's not like the rest. LOL. I've already proven that all women are the same.

Look at iheartani, she posted here and deleted her post. She got bitter when another user started saying that she rejected a guy for his face. All women reject men for their face.

Look at the black girl from the east coast that posted here last month. Another incel messaged her asking to go on a genuine date and then ghosted. He exposed her on the sub, which wasn't news, just a reminder of how women can't be incel, and that she came here to be a sex toy for chads.

There are many other experiences. I would love to know why women try to make believe they aren't worthless trash but they all are. All women are the same and belong tied to out bedroom posts.

An0nym0us1dea #fundie reddit.com

Religion is designed to focus the people’s attention and energy on a single, unchanging, uncompromising and invisible supreme being who allegedly created an inferior human race just for some extra companionship and love for himself and then supposedly foisted a set of oppressive and in some cases arbitrary rules on them, which if broken would be met with unimaginable punishment.

This keeps the followers in a continuing state of fear and compliance. They are afraid to question the intentions of this invisible being and they are afraid of even expressing their own individuality in many cases. Christians and others are taught that they have virtually no power to do anything except pray, worship and do good deeds.

They are taught to practice self denial and are told that their own will is totally irrelevant. Religious followers believe that they are yielding their will over to a benevolent cosmic individual who has single-handedly created the whole universe and has their best interests at heart when in fact they are handing over their will and freedoms to hidden groups of religious elites for the elites own personal gains.

It appears that religion must constantly degrade and humiliate its followers in order to glorify and elevate its god. Unfortunately many people appear eager to give away their power to authority and seem to have a need and even a desire to be ruled and disciplined by it.

Worshipping gods is futile and is nothing more than an ancient primitive custom practiced by weak minded and superstitious people. It has no place in the 21st century. The reason we have life in this world is to experience life in this world, not to spend our entire lives studying an old book, looking up to the sky and worshipping an invisible ruler in another realm.

The main method by which Christians in particular are trapped and deceived is with the messiah or saviour story. This is linked to the ‘original sin’ story which is designed to impose a large amount of guilt onto the whole of humanity. The believers are then so grateful that they have been saved by the son of God nearly 2000 years before they were born that in some cases they abandon all reason, logic and good judgment to obey and worship this god and his son.

Anyone who believes this story is indeed lost because to believe that a god would send his only son to help us, only to see his son get tortured and murdered, and then instead of unleashing all his wrath, simply absolve us from all crimes past and present, is pure madness to say the least.

Where is the lesson for us in that? What has been achieved? There is no lesson or purpose because it’s all about mass psychological enslavement and disempowerment. The so called god that we are expected to worship is undoubtedly just a dictator strawman concocted by the religious elites for the purpose of controlling the masses.

If there is a prime creator in this universe then it is unlikely that he would interfere and impose on us by foisting his arbitrary laws, let alone need and demand our frivolous worship and blind obedience. Neither of those things requires any level of mental aptitude or creativity. The intelligence and skills that’s been given to many has gone totally to waste. Many have lowered themselves to the pointless practice of hero worship.

Furthermore, Christianity, Islam and a few other religions are polarized religions. They are polarized against each other. One is believed to be good and the other is seen as bad. The funny thing is, is that each one thinks that their’s is good and the other’s is bad. In most ways they’re both bad. The only good kind of religion is a neutral and all loving one. Polarized religions have been devised by influential elite leaders to play the people off against each other.

That way the elite can defeat and enslave the population practically without lifting a finger. Religion is like a drug to some. And they need a 2000 year old hero to save them - from themselves that is! The churches don’t permit their followers to have any real truth and knowledge because that would empower the people too much so they spoon feed them kiddie stories, half truths, distortions and even lies and the followers value it highly even though they must spend the rest of their lives just making sense of it.

The irony is that religion is pretty much man made, so mankind has really brought this onto themselves. The religious elites are not totally to blame because many people actually enjoy listening to mystical sounding stories, performing rituals, customs and traditions, playing polarity roles and dramas and waging battles against what they perceive to be a devil boogie man. They also have a secret fetish to be dominated and ruled with an iron fist by a supreme ruler or king. After all these centuries people still haven’t learned to take back their power and start taking responsibility for themselves .

LIVIPOO #sexist en.wikipedia.org

Definition of Sexism

Alright people, yo7u all bang on about people being sexist but have you seen the defanition of sexism!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Thats right the DEFINITION IS SEXIST. Defanitipon of sexist: prejudice, stereotyping, or discrimination, typically against women, on the basis of sex. It isn´t just women. How do you think men feel. Life is now not fair and this needs to change

GodGunsGuts #conspiracy freerepublic.com

AIDS is the biggest public health scam in medical history. Like global warming, AIDS is being used to push a powerful leftist political agenda. For over two decades the Public Health Establishment has used your tax dollars and the full power of the federal government to wage a massive propaganda (and intimidation) campaign designed to:

(A) prevent the American public from hearing the scientific evidence that suggests HIV may not cause AIDS
(B) scare the public into thinking "we are all at risk"
(C) coverup the extreme toxicity of AIDS chemotherapy drugs (which are not just used on "fast-track" gays and junkies, but also given to pregnant mothers, infants, and children)
(D) use this fear to push a leftist social agenda that includes socialized medicine, and the promotion of homosexuality and explicit sex "education" to tender-aged school children
(E) use their "public health mandate" to bypass the authority of parents and local school boards who object to their social engineering schemes
(F) create a massive federal bureaucracy encouraging the use of addictive drugs, to include prescription heroine
(G) use threats and intimidation to silence dissenting scientists and to keep the press from covering the debate
(H) and finally, to use AIDS as a model to push similar social agendas with respect to future epidemics.

Lookismisreal #sexist reddit.com

Women should be locked in chastity belts

Femoids have an unquenchable thirst to slut around with different men, especially Chad and Tyrone. And due to such, they embrace the way of promiscuity since a very young age, and ride the cawk-arousel until they settle with some beta provider. Which is why chastity belts need to be reintroduced to this society once again to control hedonistic pleasures of bitches.

All father's should make a mandatory rule where their daughters should wear and be locked in chastity belts -- and by doing so, it would decrease the number of premarital sex rapidly and would also decrease the epidemic of young single mothers. When a femoid reaches her appropriate age, the father would then handover the key to her partner; the male owner. Who would also keep the femoid locked in the chastity belt until he wants to engage in sex with her. This is not only a very good method for men to avoid getting cucked, but also prevent femoid cunts from succumbing to their deep rooted sluttiness.

Conservative #fundie conservapedia.com

Atheists and physical attractiveness

The English anthropologist Edward Dutton indicates that using right-wing politics as a proxy for religiosity, there is evidence that atheists are less attractive and he pointed out that right-wing politicians are more likely to have symmetrical faces according to a study.

The American contrarian blog Half Sigma declared:

...atheists are most likely to live alone.
This is not surprising. Atheists are less desirable...partners. I observed this once when I was living in Washington, DC, and I wandered by an atheist convention happening on the mall. The atheist were predominately male, and significantly uglier than average.

This is because ugly people become social outcasts, and social outcasts are more likely to be attracted to outcast movements like atheism, libertarianism, communism, etc.

Jay Fink writes:

If you are attractive and have a good social life you will generally not be interested in out of the mainstream groups or ideas. Why buck the status quo when it's working in your interests?

In the Western World, atheists have lower marriage rates (see: Atheism and marriage). In addition, compared to deeply religious cultures where an extended family and a sense of community often exists, secular countries are often lonelier societies (sSee: Atheism and loneliness).

The Audacious Epigone blog, which specializes in collecting data relative to stereotypes, writes about atheists having an above average propensity to live in single person households:

The low rates of multiple person households is part of the explanation, but the high number of lone wolves among their ranks illustrates their social marginality in another way relative to the cognitive endowments they enjoy. This does little to dispel stereotype I hold of atheists as cynical, single white guys who live in apartments downtown, work at used record stores, love George Carlin, and watch Adult Swim.