Similar posts

Various incels #sexist incels.co

All foids are the same -megathread

(RemoveNormalfags)
Isn't it crazy, how all foids are mindless robots?
In this thread we collect things to prove that point.

-All foids want Chad
-All foids hate ugly men
-All foids like travelling
-All foids are libtards
-All foids have simps
-All foids like Netflix
-All foids like similar foods
-All foids aren't interested in history or geography
-All foids make fun of men who can't get laid
-All foids have celebrities, which they worship
-All foids want to wear expensive clothes

(Animecel2D)
everey single one of them is the exact sdame. like off some fucking factory tbh, they have npo orignality, nothing different whatsiever

(DepravedAndDeprived)

-All foids have socil media
-All foids think they're more imporant than they really are
-All foids have not had sex with me

(Smitty)
-All foids have it easy
-All foids hate men
-All foids are evil

(metabuxx)
- All foids live on tutorial mode
- All foids are whores on Tinder and OnlyFans
- All foids want us dead
- All foids fuck dogs
- All foids are murderers who kill their babies
- All foids are worthless scum of this soyciety

Witchwind #sexist witchwind.wordpress.com

UTOPIA: what would a women’s society look like?

I haven’t been writing in a while, and it’s not because I don’t like writing any more but things have accelerated elsewhere in my life and I can’t be involved everywhere at once. As this isn’t paid work, obviously I can’t afford to put blogging first.

Anyway, there are still many posts waiting to be finished. In the meantime, I’ll start another one.

I often muse about all the things that we’d need to change about patriarchy if we abolished men’s rule over women and the earth. Everything and every single aspect of social organisation is so much the opposite of how it should be, it’s dizzying to even begin to think about all the things we should stop / change.

Mostly it’s about men stopping from doing harm. But stopping men isn’t enough because beyond that there is the entire world to relearn, to heal, and our entire society to rebuild. We would be faced with the immense task of replacing all the misogynist, genocidal, biocidal practices men have ordered our society with for eons. So many of us now are acculturated, cut from land, nature and from one another.

If we managed to overcome men’s tyranny over us, how would we rebuild our world? I just want to throw some ideas here that I often come across these days. I dream for concrete, down-to-earth, simple and easily applicable measures of stepping out of patriarchy into a female-loving, biophilic world. This isn’t by any means a realistic plan of how to achieve it, but just reading it makes me feel happy. It makes it feel more real, more possible. Enjoy!

SOCIAL STRUCTURES

Men’s position in society

Before we do anything, the very first measure to adopt is to take all men out of all positions of decision-making immediately, and actually out of any kind of social, professional position whatsoever.

Major serial killers, serial torturers, pimps, pornographers, severe domestic abusers, serial rapists, genocide planners, biocide planners and pedocriminals across the world will simply be euthanised: the decisions will be taken by women in a mass world tribunal for patriarchal crimes. This is by far the best solution, and is the most legitimate, ethical way of reducing male population to more reasonable levels. Such men would otherwise forever pose a threat to women, children, animals, the earth and society as a whole, and we know they have no chance of ceasing their violent behaviour after having reached such an advanced stage of sadism and sociopathy. It would be reckless to spend space, resources and energy in keeping them alive in prisons.

All of men’s (alive and euthanised) belongings, property, resources and land will be confiscated from men and handed back to female care and supervision – property rights over land will be abolished. You can’t own land!

All men at least above 15 (or younger if very asocial) should live separately from women and children, on their own in small huts or studios, isolated from one another and scattered around so that women can keep an eye on them (they should never be in groups or packs, that would be illegal). So it would also be illegal for male adults to impose their presence on females, girls and children. Men would have to care for themselves on their own: food, laundry, etc. No male above his age of puberty would be allowed to receive any kind of service from a female. Their life expectancy would probably drop to the age of 40, but that’s how things should be. Women’s life expectancy without men would rise to 130 years at least.

PIV would be illegal too of course, as well as the initiation of any verbal or physical contact to women and girls or boy children, unless solicited by a woman for specific matters. I’m not sure what to do about boy children. Obviously you know my opinion, but let’s say that’s up to the mother to decide what she wants to do before he turns of age to leave the female family circle.

In order to keep all men and post-pubescent boys busy, we’d send them to clean up the vast amounts of detritus, pollution and toxic wastes men have littered and almost killed the world with. Much of the damage to the earth is irreversible, however with a great deal of effort and genius, women will find sustainable, natural and simple ways of healing a lot of the damage men have caused, and send men off to do the dirty work. No man will be allowed to take any decision without female guidance. We know what happens when men decide on their own! DISASTER.

Family, child-raising and reproduction

Fathers’ rights will cease to exist. There is no such thing as fatherhood — as we all know, it’s a myth. Men will necessarily lose all and any power to dominate and control women’s reproductive capacities.

It’s the inalienable right of each woman to control every phase of her reproduction and life creation. Abortion will be possible at any stage of pregnancy, however there will hardly be such a thing as undesired pregnancy since there won’t be any men forcing pregnancies on us any more. Abortion will nonetheless be recognised for the trauma, mutilation and loss of life that it is. The number of children and human population will naturally decrease to sustainable levels, so will the number of males born. Women will be free to experiment parthenogenesis or procreation with two female eggs.

The nuclear family will be abolished, in particular the parent’s property rights and absolute power over her child. Children will be considered as persons in need for autonomy and all form of punishment, authority or educational manipulation over children will equally be abolished. Raising and caring for children will be a collective responsibility for women, and motherhood / childcare and especially capacity to be empathetic towards children will be taken very seriously, as something that needs to be (re)learned and studied over years before being fully competent for this immense task.

Schools as we know them as punitive reclusion centres for grooming into male domination and female subordination (as well as selection system for elite executors of patriarchal institutions) will be abolished. Boys would definitely not be around the girls, certainly not most of the time, and never beyond the age of puberty. And obviously no adult male would be allowed near children.

There will be no such thing as “teachers” with positions of authority over children. “Guiders” could learn also from the children or students as much the students from them. We’d learn anything we’d want from languages to sciences to art to music to medicine to building to witchcraft to swimming (etc) without restriction of age or time, as long as it’s adapted to our capacities, level and availability. Learning would be autonomous, with guidance when needed, instead of enforced and dictated. They’d be no need for external reward, marking or punishment because the process of learning in itself is so rewarding and fascinating that it’s self-sufficient. Anyway I could go on and on, non-patriarchal learning is truly riveting.

Social structures between women.

All relationships of authority, domination and subordination will be abolished between all women of all ages. We will be able to recognise each other’s strengths, expertise, guidance and capacities (or lack of) without it implying superiority, inferiority, veneration or lack of respect. We would find each other beautiful. We would live our friendships, love and affection for women unhindered.

MEN’S INSTITUTIONS

All oppressive male institutions will be abolished after men have been retrieved from them. We obviously won’t keep these institutions. They will return to the nothingness that they belong, just as a distant, bad memory.

Military:

No more military, no more army, no more wars! It would be illegal for men to hold weapons. Global peace would be the immediate consequence. Most weapons will be destroyed (or recycled into something else), such as weapons of mass destruction, anti-personnel mines, tanks, machine guns, all manners of terrestrial, marine and air-bombers, and all the many disgusting things men have invented. For the remaining weapons such as guns or blades, women will hold exclusive right of use over them in order to defend ourselves from men, from the risk of them taking power over us again.

State:

States, borders, nations, laws would be abolished and totally dispensed with. Laws mentioning the number of prohibited acts will be kept for men only. Women do not need laws to contain ourselves. Laws were created by the male elite to protect their property from other men. Laws are rigid and static, that’s because their purpose is to hold existing patriarchal powers in place. Our own society would be in constant evolution, improvement, creative renewal, yet grounded in reality and adapted to our needs and circumstances.

Women would be able to move freely.

Societal structures and decision-making assemblies wouldn’t exceed roughly 300 women (representing no more than themselves). Keeping numbers low for cooperation is important because the greater the size of the unit, the more horizontal cooperation becomes difficult and requires vertical hierarchy. Possibilities for peaceful, cooperative organisation between women are infinite – as long as they respect the individual integrity of every female – the group should never weigh over the individual but be a source for support and efficient organisation of collective life and space. There could easily be associations of exchange between different groups and peoples in order for women to cooperate regionally and globally where necessary. There would be no limit in age of participation in decision-making for women and girls, which means adapting the format to different ages and capacities.

Medicine:

Men would be permanently banned from any kind of medical practice. All woman-hating, genocidal institutions such as gynecology, psychiatry, obstetrics, big pharma, the torture of living beings in the name of “scientific experimentation” will be banned. Men’s fragmented, objectifying, sadistic view the human body will be part of history, replaced by biophilic medicine. Medical science will no longer be monopolised by a small elite but available to all at any age where appropriate. The (female) doctor’s role will be to guide the patient in her own healing, never to exercise authority over her or take decisions at her expense. Special healing spaces (where surgery is necessary, etc) will be so nice, warm and welcoming that just being there will make you feel better. The soul and life conditions of a person will always be considered part of the body, and symptoms will always be understood in a holistic way. There will be no more chemical, synthetic and toxic products with often worse side effects than the illness itself it claims to heal.

Perfect health would be the normal state of women anyway, as we will learn by experience and observation what we should eat and do to stay healthy at all seasons and times. Most women will have rediscovered our healing, divination and extra-sensory communication powers.

Religion:

Patriarchal religions will crumble down with men’s oppressive system. Religious ideologies, along with its hierarchies and vacuous rituals will cease to exist. I believe a woman’s world would be spiritual. Spiritual connection isn’t based on faith but on critical observation and experience, on a real personal connection to the elements, beings and spirits that surround us, and on the real magnetic power of beings.

Economy (tied to ecology):

Obviously, Slavery, men’s exploitation of women, men’s capitalist systems will be abolished too. The most important aspect of male economy is that it’s based on men’s competitive accumulation of resources (by killing, destroying, commodifying, taking control over, extracting the greatest possible amount of life) and based on production of poisonous, addictive, programmed obsolescent goods — in order to win the patriarchal game of achieving greater domination over women and girls.

This necrophilic relationship to the world and the environment will be abolished, to be replaced by biophilic ecological and economic principles. This will encompass every single process of our life activities, from house building, to food consumption, to communication, travelling, furniture making, cooking, etc. They will have to be carefully designed and thought out in a way as to never endanger the survival of any species, never pollute any environment, never require the use of poisonous, non-recyclable materials, never to require indentured labour or exploitation in order to be maintained. This would obviously impact the nature and scale of our activities. “Work” (exploitation and division of labour) as we know it would disappear. It would be the responsibility of each individual or group to sustain herself more or less autonomously.

We should learn to observe our environment and deeply understand the interconnectedness of all beings around us, as well our own impact before deciding whether or how to transform it. Our lives have no more or no less value than those of a rabbit, fly, tree, plant, fish, seashell or stone. For instance, if we pick leaves of some plants, it’s important not to rip the whole plant off, to take only parts of it so it can grow again. Or to only take a few plants (or seashells, whatever) where there are many, so to respect the survival of the species where it is settled. If we cut trees to build our house, replant them. There are also infinite ways of making the most of materials for energy, food or production while using it as efficiently as possible. Building houses in ways that don’t require heating in winter or cooling in the summer. It is now widely known that energy such as electricity can be infinitely renewable if we use wind power, magnetic power, water power… And everything can be made DIY.

We will learn to be autonomous again and make our own clothes, food, furniture, houses, soaps, detergent products – or maybe someone else will make them but most things can be handmade and it’s so much more rewarding.

In a biophilic world, nothing is garbage, nothing is pollution. Everything is conceived so as to be part of a life cycle. This doesn’t mean we should keep the same toothbrush for 50 years or never improve on our machines, technology and infrastructure, but there’s no such thing as a dump, or toxic spilling. All materials should be harmless, recyclable or biodegradable, given back the earth if we no longer need them.

Industrial agriculture and farming:

Genetic modification of plants, pesticides, monoculture, field ploughing and consequent aridification of the land will be considered criminal. Our right to self-sustenance would no more be confiscated by mega food corporations – as they will no longer exist.

Agriculture should always be small-scale, local, and as much as possible be modelled on wildlife, self-growing / self-renewing conditions (the less work and intervention, the better), and especially be conceived so as to nourish and sustain rather than deplete wildlife and environmental balance. Again, possibilities are infinite, we have so much to learn.

And seriously, killing animals you’ve raised yourself in a farm or keeping animals enclosed is cruel. I’m for the liberation of all farm and domestic animals. It’s up to them to decide whether they want to live with us or not, and they should be able to come and go freely. Maybe after a few decades, after the human population has stalled, male population has decreased, and after we’ve made serious efforts for reforestation and restoration of wildlife on the earth, it would probably be fairer to hunt animals occasionally. Right now, given the extinction rate of animal species, I find it criminal to hunt or fish. We don’t need to eat that much meat anyway.

virgin4life and various unnamed incels #psycho incels.co

If you could push a button and half of all men would die. Would you do it?

I think the main reason why inceldom is becoming such a huge issue and foids standards have grown to insane levels is because there are way too many men. In western countries there are twice as many single men than single women.

Let's say you could push a button and 50% of all men would die but it was guaranteed that you and anyone you put on a list will not die so you do not have to be concerned about dying yourself or having any of your friends die. Would you do it?

I would tbh. I would be worried about women gaining political power but chances to find a foid would dramatically increase as there would be desparate single foids all over the place.

Poll: “Would you kill 50% of all men if you could do it with the push of a button?”
<table>

Yes 15 votes 62.5%
No 7 votes 29.2%
I don’t know… 2 votes 8.3%

Nathan "Leucosticte" Larson #sexist incels.co

The reason why foids keep wanting to join sites like Incels.me

is not JUST so that they can get a bunch of gullible orbiters to serve as their loyal band of cucks, offering them resources, protection, validation, emotional support, etc. in vain hope of getting sexual favors in return. It's not JUST that they want to divide the community by instigating a clash between foolish white knights and men who want to rightfully put foids in their place and call them out on their bullshit.

It's also because they want to gain acceptance for the idea that their inability to get a commitment from Chad is as severe a problem as incels' inability to get any pussy AT ALL. They want to elevate their own petty grievances, at not being able to lock down a guy who's way out of their league, as being as extreme a torment as what incels receive. This will put them in a position where if incels actually start to attract any sympathy, they can divert that away from incels toward themselves, by saying, "I'm miserable too, but it's even worse for me, because I'm A GIRL, which makes me all the more sensitive and pitiable than men, who are strong and can suck up whatever life throws at them! Tee-hee!"

Foids know that in a community where both incels and foids are talking about their suffering, men will focus primarily on helping the foids ("women and children first," and all that) because it's so ingrained in male nature to help the damsel in distress, while leaving men to look after their own needs.

Foids also want to gain acceptance for the idea that if they've made bad choices in the past that have fucked up their own lives and that of their kids, they should be forgiven and allowed to socialize with the same kind of men whom they fucked over by making those very choices (to choose Chad over incels). They want to further humiliate incels by making them have to be around the same people who STILL, to this day, will not open their legs to them. In their view, if incels are gullible enough to fall for their claims of just wanting to show some solidarity and support (which is really just more empty platitudes; if females won't offer their holes, everything else just amounts to, "I'm sorry you have to go through that"), then they deserve what they get.

This is the whole reason for IncelTears's existence -- if foids can't attack the community from within, they'll gather some Reddit cucks together and attack it from the outside. They have managed to assemble a community of tens of thousands of men who are trying to virtue signal to impress them. These men have sunk to a new low, devoting their time and effort to pleasing these foids, at the expense of their fellow man, just for a pat on the back and some Reddit karma. If you're going to be a cuck, you should at least get SOME pussy now and then, when your wife's boyfriend is off fucking some other broad. For this reason, the Internet white knight is even more pathetic than the IRL white knight.

Lastly, foids want to trivialize male inceldom as being no worse than what they go through. They want to imply that being a being a 25-year-old KHHV is no worse than being a girl who has to settle for a sub-8 man who's willing to take care of her and give her an easy life just because she has a pussy. If they can trivialize male inceldom, then if incels call for any social changes to elevate their status to something higher than being a slave to serve the feminine imperative, foids will be in a position to shame them for being unreasonable and oppressive, because they've already established that foids are getting fucked over by male behavior equally as much as incels are getting fucked over by feminism.

In reality, everyone is suffering under the current state of affairs, but it's not in foids' nature to be able to work with men to try to change society for the better. They're always going to want to try to manipulate the situation for their own advantage, because that's what foids do. Relations between the sexes are always sexual; there's no avoiding that. When foids are around, men are going to get distracted by trying to strategize how they can put their dick in a foid, and foids are going to divide up whatever men are around into Chads and non-Chads, open their legs to the Chads, and manipulate the non-Chads into serving as their cuck orbiters.

Any non-Chad who doesn't cooperate with the feminine imperative, and instead tries to put a stop to her manipulative behavior, she will try to exile from the community, so that she can eliminate an adversary who might otherwise get in the way of her selfish agenda. This is why so many females want to become moderators. Even if they seem at first like they might be okay, it's never going to end well, because foids always abuse whatever power they're given over men, much more than men do when given power over foids.

dlo_3us2001 #fundie groups.yahoo.com

(Commenting on a YouTube video posted entitled "Transgender Activist: Men Should Find Us Attractive - Men Are Bigots? - Tucker Carlson" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vNFzrqCnbGM It's hard to know where to start with this post when the ignorance and bigotry run so deep...)

HAHA.

Are the people getting crazier or WHAT??

Why in the world would these men thing that straight men would want them?

That would make the straight men GAY!!

I would never be part of the deception that they demand of us. Can you imagine me introducing a male friend of mine to a transsexual male and not telling him that this was really a male dressed up as a female.

I would no doubt lose my male friends trust. This male cannot give the other male a baby.

Imagine if I introduce a female friend to a transsexual female and not telling her that this was really a female dressed up as a male.

My friend would be furious with me that I deceived her. After all that female can't give her a baby either.

I refused to be commanded to go along with any of this.

Remember the member you had on the board that go so mad at me because I wouldn't call him a she?

I took a lot of flack for that, but I told this person the very same thing I said above about NOT deceiving my friends.


Sandy

Over4Mexicels #elitist incels.co

We incels have an aristocratic soul

Most of incels in the past would have been philosophers, historians, scribes, mathematicians and military men.

We would be notable men, while most Foids and normies would be peasents living in mud. Chads would be kings relying on our astronomical knowledge of the world.

That most of us hold higher ideals is just evidence that in the past we were part of the aristocracy. Its not our fault that degeneration took over and our ancestors werent able to maintain their physical vigor and appearance. Or that they decided to defile their racial purity.

I think this is also why we detest mass driven politics such as democracy and socialism.

Godschild #fundie atheistforums.org

Surely you can't mean you do not understand what I was saying, let's go at it again. God gave man the permission to eat meat of some animals that were on the Ark. Man also eat vegetation, there were probably many nuts laying around, nuts will last for years. As far as eight people eating up the animals they were allowed to eat, why do you think God told them there would be seven pairs of those animals. Many animals reproduce at quite a good rate, and fish would have been abundant, not just for man but also for the animals who would need meat to eat along with vegetation. Many animals that eat meat also eat vegetation, seaweeds would have be in great supply, seaweed is a great source of food. Milk from sheep and goats would have supplied a great source of nutrition. There would have been fourteen supplying milk, eggs from birds like chickens would have supplied more eggs than they could eat and still have plenty of chicks, in a years time there would have been hundreds of chickens alone to eat and lay eggs which would have supplied most of there food needs until other animals had a chance to grow their populations. Chickens start laying eggs within six months of hatching. I have three chicken I got as chicks back in the spring, they are now laying more eggs than I and my pup can eat and these are not even a huge eggs producing breed. I have three others that very good producers and there are days those three will lay as many as nine eggs a day, what do you think fourteen would produce and in six months an abundance of chicks will have grown up and started laying. There would have been plenty for the people and some of the animals. Need I continue, sheep, goats and chickens would have supplied the eight with plenty until a good recovery was under way, plus the vegetation they would have, seems to me they would have eaten quite well.

GC

Various incels #sexist incels.co

(RopeShow)
Even a foid with no vagina whatsoever can score a chadlite.

(video about a young woman with Müllerian agenesis, a birth defect where most of the internal genitalia fail to form)

And also a reminder:
Even if you're Chad, if you have no dick you will be discarded or turned into a betabuck as soon as a foid knows it.

(AfrikanCel)
Is it trans?

If it is naturally a foid without a vagina I would marry her. Guaranteed virgin and lifelong blowjobs.

:feelsrope:

(unwanted)
3:18 She has a Chad :feelsrope:

(_wifebeater_)
Even chads are desperate cucks these days.

(Nautica19ß3)
The only thing that can MAYBE make a women be incel is if she was nothing but a brain,heart, and nerves in a jar attached to a machine that allows her to communicate with people,

(AfrikanCel)

Even chads are desperate cucks these days.

It is OVER

(notgoingtomakeit)

Is it trans?

If it is naturally a foid without a vagina I would marry her. Guaranteed virgin and lifelong blowjobs.


Lol. You think she would give you a lifetime of blowjobs even without a vagina? Think again Mr Popo.

(AfrikanCel)
At least I will be loved by a virgin.

(SelfCrucified)
Wrong again. She definitely gave up the ass for chad, Tyrone, brad, etc in her teens or college years

(AfrikanCel)
It is OVER

(big nose bug eyes)
Hell I'd date her just because being with an attractive girl increases your status a few points.

(UBERCEL)

The only thing that can MAYBE make a women be incel is if she was nothing but a brain,heart, and nerves in a jar attached to a machine that allows her to communicate with people,

High IQ, still people would attach onaholes with glue and pump the machine dry

(Nautica1983)
JFL, people would just put her organs into a sexdoll and fuck her. Females literally cannot be incel

(Damo the incel)
Wtf I thought u might be joking but no this foid has somehow hot here fucking looks match with out even having a sexual organ, and us guys are the shallow ones were told ? I hate femoids so fucking much. Imagine a guy without a dick getting his looks match ? I can't even imagine that because it wouldn't happen in a million years

(Dungcel)

At least I will be loved by a virgin.

Mouthfucking is still fucking, and she has probably blown at least 50 dudes with that pretty face.

various incels #sexist #dunning-kruger #quack incels.co

(Silverandgold)
Even when I was younger and more of a normal man, not a sexually frustrated nihilistic misanthrope, I didn’t think rape was that bad. I thought it was wrong, like stealing a loaf of bread or maybe an expensive TV at worst, but I never thought it was a crime worthy of jail time. I never thought it was a crime that was unforgivable. I always thought it was ridiculous when rapists got lumped in with murderers and child molesters. Rape is really not that serious. Women just don’t like it because the men are ugly. If I was raped by an ugly woman, I would take it as a compliment. Now if she was really fat, elderly, and had smelly genitals that she forced me under gunpoint to lick, I would be mad. I would probably vomit. But I wouldn’t be traumatized for life or believe that the woman deserves to be in prison for 10 years. A hefty fine would be enough. Women who get raped are no virgins. women who get raped have sex with at least 10 men by age 20 so how is it traumatic to take just one more penis? It’s not. Women have too much time on their hands to dwell on things and become neurotic about unimportant situations. If women were in a tribe, they would get raped all the time and wouldn’t even care anymore after one point because they would have more important things to worry about like surviving in the harsh environment. By the way, I don’t want to rape anyone. It wouldn’t turn me on to be with someone who is repulsed by me. I Would never rape someone even if I could get away with it. I’m just thinking out loud. Rape isn’t that bad. By the way, I know a woman who got raped by a black man when she was a teenager and she turned out okay. She is a happy wife and mom now of 3 kids.

(mentalcel666)
depends on the rape, if the rape is brutal with alot of physical harm and injuries then there should be a prison sentence since its the same as assault or something.

but normal rape is just what all animals do, you think the dog or elephant waits for consent? no

same with early humans, im convinced most babies come from rape because woman had no protection from the law, so the strongest male could just take the women and rape her because he is stronger, and since there were no abortions back then they had to deliver the baby,

so most modern women are descendants of women being raped. thats why they like being submissive, its an evolutionary trait passed down from all the females that have been raped for thousands of years before the law was invented

(Dialgatime321)
LOL based, women know this is true, they just crave attention and validation and also shit-test constantly, and thus must always put max effort into appearing to be victims at all times.

My only problem with your post is when you claimed, "Women have too much time on their hands to dwell on things and become neurotic about unimportant situations. If women were in a tribe, they would get raped all the time and wouldn’t even care anymore after one point because they would have more important things to worry about like surviving in the harsh environment."

BS. They're not "neurotic", they don't mind it that much. They may convince themselves that they are victims, but deep down inside they know they're not. They don't "care", they're just using shit like #MeToo to shit-test and gain attention and validation, not to mention ensure that virgins can never ascend.
>Assuming women tell the truth when they say they don't like rape and it's "the most horrible thing ever"
:feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha:

One more note, men take care of women entirely, so they're entitled to pussy 100%. The only problem with rape is that it's disorganized, creates hierarchies, and instills no responsibility to caretake on the part of the rapist (there are a few more, can't think of them right now). Therefore, rape damn well should be illegal and is immoral, but under Betrev (beta revolution), women would be paired involuntarily with men who chose them based on a decision made by a bureau of deciding which man is more productive to society, and they would not be obligated to work (in fact making women enter the workforce would be illegal, JFL at MGTOW and MRA who want women to pull themselves up by their bootstraps and work just as hard as men, that will never happen and never should).

Women should not even be obligated to do housework, JFL at maledoms who think their "house/tradwaifus" aren't hiding broken glass in the couch cushions to shit-test. In return, every man is entitled to 1 sex a day, no strings attached.

HalfAsianTruthTeller #racist stormfront.org

The TRUTH ABOUT WHITE MEN AND ASIAN WOMEN FROM THEIR EURASIAN SON
Asian women and their insistence on breeding with white men is not something based on love, but rather on hate (largely of Asian men), yet their sons are Asian men and we are taught from birth that love is not colorblind. If love were color blind, then there would indeed be more Asian men breeding with Asian women, black women, or white women, but instead Asian women rely on their privilege of having a vagina, being the gatekeepers to sex, to negotiate relationships with white men in a perverse form of hypergamy. If love were honest, and good, and unbiased, then Asian women would marry black men, Indian men, and Hispanic men at the same rate that they do White men. But they do not. If love were honest, good, and unbiased, then Asian women would be as open to dating Asian men as they are white men. But they are not.

For this reason, I curse my own mother, I am glad she is dead, and I hate every ounce of the whore, slut, white-worshiping piece of trash that my mother, an Asian woman from Hong Kong, was. I am not alone in this feeling, as I’m sure there are hundreds of thousands of Eurasian men who have, at one point in their life, questioned their own mothers.

Whether they do this for status or for appearance is not relevant, though I do think that it is probably for the sake of appearance, since the taller build, wider face, and healthier skin color of white men might be the main reason why Asian women chase white males. Regardless of their reasons, they clearly will not stop doing it, and completely ignore the massive negative repercussions this has on their children, like me.

I was born of this relationship and to this day, I remain a failure, full of self hatred, lost, confused, and destined to die by my own hand, or to die having run to the furthest corners of the world, now for five years, to get away from the very thing that birthed me.

I will, as a result, maybe as one of the only things I may accomplish in my life, write about the insanity of these relationships, how they are the ugliest thing on earth, and how they lead to pure disaster for their male children, the worst case being Elliot Rodger, whose sentiment, at times, I emulated with. I have long been known as eccentric, odd, weird, lost, and have a poor reputation among people who know me as being antisocial, distant, and prone to lunatic beliefs; the day before Elliot Rodger’s massacre I even reached out to him on a popular forum and told him that I identified with his feelings, his self-doubt, his narcissism, his issues with his mother, and I said that they were uniquely Eurasian male issues.

So, these relationships are sick, for the following reasons:

1) The white males, in many cases, view the Asian female as an easy alternative to white women, and as a valid vessel to propagate the continuation of their intelligent, master-race “genes,” whereas white women are seen as being sexually perverse, and prone to mating and having relations with the “lesser races.” My father is a strong example, having long harbored extremely religious, white-supremacist, and misogynist viewpoints. Some, in many ways, would consider him a Men’s Rights Activist, or to a lesser extent, a MGTOW, who, like many other white men, felt entitled to a world where God reigned, valued the white man, and white civilization, rewarded the white man for being white, and, when white women failed to recognize his inherent “power,” (instead choosing to lie down with black males, or to party, or embrace liberalism or feminism), Asian women, of course, were the next best choice. I also know this because having come across numerous other blogs (hapasons.wordpress.com) that talk about the same issue, my case seemed remarkably common. My father, for example, believes the Nazis were heroes, and my mother even called the police on him, when we were growing up, for talking about how the Holocaust never happened. He strongly supports Mel Gibson, goes on racist rants about blacks, and vehemently hates Jews, Hollywood, and modern day American society. In this way, my “chaste,” Oriental mother was a strong alternative for him to marry, as Asian women are well known for worshiping white males.

2) The white males oftentimes are socially inept, socially awkward, or unable to compete in the modern day marketplace, both sexual and economic. My father would be diagnosed with Aspberger’s Syndrome if such a syndrome was known in his younger days. He is a social recluse, has almost no friends, listens to wave radio, believes strongly in conspiracy theories that are very common to White Nationalists and anti-semites, and believes strongly in God and that God hates Jews and that the judgement day will eventually come; common to people like this, white supremacy, the belief in Aryan people at the top, with Asian people being a distant cousin, and Asian women, of course, being a healthy substitute for hypergamous, slutty, immoral White women, while Asian women remain hypergamous in their own right. I know this, because sadly, I am both antisocial, have long since disappeared from all of my friends, have gone through a thorough depression at the way American society was, and during the time period that I considered myself “white,” I too embraced white nationalism (sadly), and was so depressed about white women mating with men of color that I sought refuge in China, to await the eventual apocalypse. As insane as it sounds, this is what brought me to this country, and I would have killed myself had I not been saved by my wife.

3) Asian women make divergent, opposing, and illogical statements about Asian men that will eventually find their way to their sons. The common claims from Asian women about why they don’t date Asian men come in two forms: The first is that Asian men are patriarchal, controlling, and conservative. THIS IS A PATENT LIE.

This is a lie because the white men that they engage in relationships with are even more patriarchal, racist, and conservative, looking to Asian women as an alternative to feminist white women. The entire premise of white feminism is that white men are TOO CONTROLLING, PATRIARCHAL, AND CONSERVATIVE. I know this looking at my own father, who is by far the most patriarchal, far-right individual that I know, so much so that it might have eventually contributed to my mother’s death. Again, there are several other races that Asian women can choose from, but they only choose white men, making this a complete fabrication and lie based on faulty logic and excuses. The very fact that they are capable of framing an entire group of men as the same while saying that another group (white men) are inherently better reeks of

The second claim is that Asian men are ugly, unattractive, small, with small penises, which contrasts strongly with the claim that Asian men are overbearing and too patriarchal. The horrible danger of this claim is that it trickles down to Asian women’s very own sons, who begin to SERIOUSLY doubt that their mother’s “preference” has anything to do with character, and everything to do with physicality – whereby I have come to despise and hate my own mother with a vehement passion that is borderline violent. Much of my history, if you care to read earlier in this blog, might stem from this ingrown self hatred that comes from being quite literally cuckolded by my own mother, whose own belief that white men are physically superior mentally drains and destroys me, as her male offspring, and causes a bitter, catastrophic dichotomy within myself.

Regardless of the “reasons,” or if sexual preference can be negotiated, the very fact that it is so common and the fact that our mother’s choices were based inherently on preference for determinants of sexual / genetic health make all of our life choices irrelevant, because it is clear that ultimately our deciding factors and success in life and love are determined by our genetic makeup, so much so that our own mothers were driven in such a way to shoot down AN ENTIRE ETHNIC GROUP while giving unfair preference to another – means that any and all choices we make in life are hinged on our appearance and that nothing we can ever do can make us as attractive as a white male – as proven by OUR OWN MOTHERS.

4) Our own mothers reinforce the horrible stereotypes about Asian men. Regardless of their reasons, there are persistent stereotypes that exist in Western culture about Asian men. Whether or not they believed these stereotypes, we assume that they had no qualms about reinforcing the extreme negative image of Asian men by chasing, in droves, white men, and that our own mothers were very, very capable of betraying the possible future of their own sons by proving to the world, and their own offspring, that Asian men are and forever will be less desirable than white men. For every time that an Asian man is shot down for being Asian, the perception that Asian men are undesirable is reinforced, and our own mothers become GUILTY BY ASSOCIATION for actively being part of the self-congratulation group of Asian women who HATE ASIAN MEN AND THINK THEY ARE TOO GOOD FOR ASIAN MEN. For this, my own mother is a guilty whore, who I shall hate until my last dying breath, and I will never, ever, EVER be able to look at what she did in another way; I shall go out every day, very well aware that Asian men are so undesirable that my own mother sought to avoid them entirely, knowing that I can never, ever be viewed as desirable as them, and that any woman who notices me notices me only because I am whiter than I would otherwise be.

In Conclusion

Asian women will deny, lie, and beat around the bush until doomsday, but they will never admit that what they do is for purely physical reasons, and they will never admit that the ramifications it has upon their children is profound and disastrous. As I have read on some other blogs, this kind of relationship is purely evil, simply because it follows the patterns of basic biology and evolutionary psychology, while deceiving its offspring into thinking that it is normal; the whole “Eurasian” children or “mixed children” are valuable and / or beautiful is nothing more than a generalization and a lie, and it soon becomes evident that mixed children are birthed from couples forming extremely unbalanced patterns that favor women over men. The male offspring of these relationships are then put at special risk and wind up imploding, as is the case of my brother, who is 32 years old, bed ridden, schizophrenic, and so badly damaged from his combination of racist/religious white father / self hating Asian mother, that he is essentially dead. I am essentially considered crazy by the larger community, have been outcast to China, will die alone in a small apartment, am suicidal, depressed, and unable to work.

In short, these relationships are based on the hatred of the Asian male (in some cases, with the extra bonus of hating the white female), and the resulting offspring, should he grow up in America, be keenly aware of this societal hatred, and grow, as I did, to despise his own mother. Luckily, mine is dead, (from a bad blood transfusion after a C-section birth), otherwise I would make it my goal to humiliate, demean and hate her, as I hate Asian women who refuse to date any such race, if only because she is a rotten, ROTTEN person, and it is not enough to assume that “maybe” she did not hate Asian men – as the pattern exists enough that I would sincerely doubt her excuses if she attempted to explain it away.

FCM #fundie factcheckme.wordpress.com

imagine with me. whenever a woman is raped, every man within 20 miles of where the rape occurred is presumed to be a rapist, an accomplice, an egger-onner, an enabler, or completely disinterested (in protecting women from rape). they are all rounded up and jailed.

because it would be stressful for all women involved if there were any uncertainty regarding whether the men would be released or not — if the men were “coming home” or if they would ever again be “walking the streets to rape again” — to relieve womens stress, the answer would be NO, none of them will be released, ever. all the women would go on with their lives and never look back. there wouldnt be any prison-visits either. (feel the relief wash over you like a warm bath?)

if there was a problem of prison overcrowding (can you imagine the logistical problems we would encounter if we actually started punishing men for rape?) well thats easy — let all the newbies i mean “new fish” sleep in the recreational areas until a spot opens up. start a “communication initiative” whereby all prisoners would be given a new mont blanc pen and a letter opener and instructed to write letters to other prisoners around the country, like a pen-pal kind of thing. watch them all kill each other with the pens and letter openers. overcrowding? no longer an issue.

[...]

if we actually punished men for raping girls and women, without regard for fairness to men, and *only* caring about fairness to women and relieving womens stress, and centering womens survival as a sexual class, including the complete eradication of rapey males and rape culture, female separatism would no longer present the logistical problem it once did — “mens culture” would become prison culture. it already is, you see. under conditions of zero tolerance for men raping women, we would have “womens culture” and female separatism by default. it probably wouldnt take but a year at most for (nearly?) every single man to be rounded up and imprisoned for raping or contributing to the rape of a woman, if we actually punished men for rape, and contributing to rape.

thats literally all it would take to create female separatism: justice. thats all.

metabuxx #sexist #psycho incels.co

[RageFuel] Imagine 50 men and 50 women are stranded on an island after a violent sea storm.

They are out of resources so they would have to cooperate together for survival until help arrives.

Now imagine that out of those 50 men, 5 are Chads. What do you think is gonna happen? Each one of those 50 women will be fucking Chads for the rest of their days on the island while the other 45 men will be rotting alone. Holes will be like - "Its just a preference sweaty. Why don't you go fix the ship while I suck Chad's dick"

Do you see this island functioning at all? What incentive would these men have to contribute to the island's economy? Why the fuck would they even contribute? Just so that those holes and Chads can fuck without any worry.

And if you can't see this island functioning then how do you expect the society to function. A society where millions of women are dying to be a part of Chad's harems while their looksmatches are rotting in their basement. JFL at this cucked society.

We'd enslave the whores and make chads build ships

based thing to do

the other men would just kill the chads and redistribute the foids with the 5 left out used for being raped by anyone

Rapemaxing is the only way for sub-8 men to ascend

I think there was a show similar to this.
what ended up happening was the Chads didnt do anything (okay they did hunt once or twice) and fucked any woman they wanted. all the women didn't help in any serious way (they would fucking gather firewood/driftwood and shit that fell off the trees) and eat all the food and complain about everything then the average guys did 90% of the work. building stuff. cooking the food. making shelter. gathering food and resources.

The girls that were not good enough for Chad would find a beta male and fuck him and live in his hut and get free resources. but that was only 2-3 guys. All Chads fucked. All girls fucked. 2-3 average guys fucked. The rest rotted away BUT STILL HAD TO CONTRIBUTE to the group otherwise the women would call him a pig and sully his name to the rest of the group. then he would be outcast. So even though they were literally getting NOT A SINGLE DAM THING from the group they still had to contribute otherwise be ousted. Hmmmmm...sorta like society, eh?

(And to be fair I never watched the show. I ended up reading an article on it that some MGTOW youtube channel had posted)

Utterly brutal. Exact replica of the modern society.

I would take down the other men at night and have all the womens to myself

You must be a gymcel but I'm going to ask anyway
Realistically, how many women could you beat up at once?

Reason I ask is because if you kill all the Chads the women are not just going to let you fuck them willingly. They are going to revolt against you. Could you win against 10 women at once?

I'd probably gather a few based brocels and brutally murder chads, then rape the bitches (actually I think they'd just simply accept me submissively). I've seen this behavior among chimps btw.

nah man they would. Women are submissive. If even men act this way among alpha males despite clearly being able to kill him once let alone women who are naturally designed to avoid conflict.

Ill get a sharpened stick and start jabbing the ugly ones and the stronger women first. Then when they see i mean business theyll give up

Damn I didn't know you were a High-IQcel as well
you've thought about this scenario before lol

In a situation like this, are we assuming the same intellect or intellect inverse to looks?

In that case I think what you said above holds true for a few weeks/ months, but then the smartest normies and incels would start their own group, and go find a separate part of the island, and they would just cope there. They'd figure out more efficient ways to get food and other essential shit, meanwhile chad would fuck 7-8 foids a day, but eventually he'd get screwed cos he won't have evolved. Some Becky's would take the hint and move in with the normies (betabux) and eventually Stacy might go tell chad to bully the normies and incels to give them shit, but by this time you'd have a group of 20 high IQ normies incels made one 'state' 5 chads and medium IQ normies in another, so the 5 chads won't be able to do shit to the incels, it's quite likely incels will develop weapons too, so then chad dies out, but presumably they already impregnated the Stacies .

Incel state might send their highest T normies to go kill weakened/ dehydrated chad (ngl I knew a slayer who didn't know u can't drink seawater), and take the Stacies, and then they will kill chads spawn.

Fucking based prediction. This way they could emerge as winners without even rapemaxing. Even the simps in the group would support it.

Anonymous Coward #conspiracy godlikeproductions.com

Was Star Wars a pathway to demonic possession?

Yoda was based on an actual masonic demon-leader that is conjured up for guidance according to many researchers.

Credo Mutwa has said that Star Wars has demonic/reptilian creatures that actually exist and he singled out Darth Maul as being an actual being.

I was watching ET last night and something incredible occurs in that movie. When the main character is telling ET about life he shows him six action figures from Star Wars:

greedo
[link to starwarstoysstore.com]

hammerhead
[link to www.cybercomicsandtoys.com]

walrus man
[link to theswca.com]

snaggletooth
[link to tribeofdad.net]

Lando Calrissian
Only after Luke is possessed by the demon Yoda does Lando appear on screen. Lando represents Luke's "ascension" and "success" in a freemasonic system. Lando is how Luke sees himself at this point in the story.

Boba Fett
Boba was a clone of Jango Fett. The whole freemasonic matrix/societal system is designed to create clones.

Why would Spielberg choose those six characters, five of which were very obscure to represent what the boy thought was important about Star Wars?

It makes no sense on the surface. Five bit players + one supporting character?

ET was a demon. The movie ET was about a relationship between a boy and his demon. Spielberg was telling us something critical in that scene. Symbolically the first four characters were demons that the boy had chosen to play with because of a movie (that was the goal of ET and apparently Star Wars).

The last two characters represented possessed people: Lando Calrissian and Boba Fett. Lando represents the "independent" type except remember an important point: The empire controlled Lando's city before we met him. That symbolized how Luke was possessed and controlled before he "became" Lando.

Boba Fett was a clone who worked for the empire. He was an "independent" contractor-type but he was a worker bee for the empire when they needed him. He was better off then the storm troopers but he had sold out also.

Immediately after this Elliott points to a fishbowl with fish. He explains that the fish eat the fish food. He places a wooden toy shark into the fishbowl, then states that the shark eats the fish but nobody eats the shark.

Symbolically we are the fish and the demons are the sharks.

Reality 101

FrailPaleStaleMale #sexist incels.co

Femoid Organ Donors should be given to incels ASAP after death for sex

By definition the Vagina is an organ. It is one of the femoid reproductive organs right. The vagina is always discarded and never used after a foid fortunately dies. Therefore it makes sense to me that foids who are organ donors be given to willing incels while the body is still warm and ripe for sexual purposes. This of course would only apply to foids who allow ANY organs or tissues to be donated. This would be perfectly legal as the foid has already given written consent. This way the leftover body, looks and vagina of deceased foid wouldn't all go to waste and could be used up by incels before the rest of the body is salvaged afterwards.

This obviously won't be ideal for some cels, but it could do wonders for those who would be willing. This is the kind of post that would put people off but consider, if every other organ can be used, then what possible reason could there be for not letting one specific organ be used for its primary function.

Wagiecel #sexist #dunning-kruger incels.co

[Blackpill] The female perspective of how foids see men (Using Hitman as an example)

image

We all know 80% of men are basically invisible to foids but sometimes that's hard to visualize so here's an example.

Above is the Hitman video game. The goal is simple, kill the target.

In this scenario the Hitman is attending a party where the target is hanging out.

However as you can see even though there are many men, they don't show up on the radar. They are just background objects. That's how foids see sub8 men.

The dots on the radar are guards and they are identified because they actually can affect you. This would represent Brads, bosses and other non Chad men that foids actually acknowledge as living beings.

Then there's the target icon on the radar. That's the guy you always focus on coz you're supposed to kill him. For foids that's Chad and their focus is always on him.

So using this crappy example, it's much easier to understand how foids don't even consider 80% of men as actual living beings.

Cybersex is our hope #sexist incels.co

[Serious] Why do foids even commit crimes against us

In every single aspect of life, in every country, in every era, the most desired group is the one that is more at risk of being robbed/attacked/hated. Just think at the relations between very poor people and very rich people.
Considering that how is even possible that every year foids do actually rape/murder/isolate/ push to suicide men? If men do the same it's most of the time because of the fucking gigantic difference in intrinsic sexual market value between men and women but foids?What kind of justification can they have for committing such crimes? There should be fucking 0 crimes committed by foids against us since they can get everything they need from men legally and in a very pleasurable way. TBH foids who rape men should get much harsher punishment than men who rape foids (in the same way a rich man robbing a poor guy should be punished more than a poor starving guy who steals money from a rich man)

Nathan "Leucosticte" Larson #fundie incels.co

As an accelerationist, I actually believe an incelocalypse is likely to happen someday

By "incelocalypse" I mean, the day when incels seize pussy by force. All the incelocalypse is, is the abolition of feminism (a fairly new innovation), and the restoration of patriarchy. Patriarchy is a system in which foids are treated as property to be transferred from father to husband; typically this will be done when they are in their jailbait years, to maximize their lifetime value to the husband and minimize the expense of the father's raising them in preparation for marriage. This is how it works during peacetime; during war, of course, foids may be seized by force as war brides.

We could just as easily use a neoreaction-inspired term, and call the incelocalyptic event the Restoration. A Restoration is when a monarchy is brought back to power. Since patriarchy is just monarchy on a familial scale, all we are really doing is restoring men to their rightful position as kings of their households.

When I look at politics, I see no signs that there's going to be a switch back to patriarchy through the electoral process. We've gotten to the point where even the cuckservatives who timidly put some pro-family idea out there (e.g. "maybe we wouldn't have so many school shootings if there weren't so many boys being raised by single moms") get shamed. They can't even talk about specific proposals for reducing the number of single moms, since all the workable ideas would involve giving men authority over foids. Even the third parties, like the Libertarian Party, are a bunch of bluepilled cucks when it comes to relations between the sexes, despite the fact that they hardly ever win elections and therefore have little to lose.

Moreover, there are no signs that the trend toward doubling down on feminism is going to stop any time soon. On the contrary, in 2018, more foids have been nominated for Congress than ever before in history. This is going to be a self-perpetuating cycle, in which feminist policies lead to more female officeholders, who then enact more feminist policies, etc. They're going to be training the young foids to be "leaders" as well.

Eventually, the whole system will collapse under its own weight, because it's going to be impossible for any group of male dissidents to put a stop to the advance of feminism. Till the bitter end, they're all going to be frantically scrabbling for whatever pussy they can get (or think they can get), rather than wanting to stick their necks out and demand change. We never see men organize and protest in the streets for patriarchy, the way that foids do, because men don't create male-only spaces anymore that would be conducive for setting up a united front like that. It's foids who are always setting up "women's leadership programs" and other female-only groups, where they can freely plot against men.

Once foids are in charge of everything, even the state will stagnate and eventually collapse, just like what happens to every other big enterprise run by foids. The state will not be able to carry out its functions properly when so much of its energies are devoted to feel-good stuff like inclusivity codes of conduct and endless new measures against sexual harassment, designed to eliminate intelligent but unattractive men from the organization and better facilitate the alpha-fucks/beta-bucks feminine imperative. High-quality people will not be attracted to an organization like that, or allowed to remain in it.

Meanwhile, the demographic situation will continue to worsen. The fertility rate will continue to plunge, and humanity will retrogress to a more primitive state due to the dysgenic effect of feminist practices. Since this is unsustainable, it will have to end eventually. Maybe the bulk of mankind will regress to a subhuman state by the time of the final collapse, and it will be like the Planet of the Apes.

When you see historic events like foids gaining more power than they've ever had before, you should rejoice, because it means we're not standing still; we're making more progress toward the collapse and rebuilding. When the end of civilization does come, the new civilization will have to be built along patriarchist lines, because that is the fundamental human instinct and what we always go back to, whenever the state doesn't get in the way. The male wants to be dominant and the female wants to be submissive, so people will revert back to that when they have the opportunity.

Maybe the new order will also get corrupted by feminism and collapse, but hopefully in the meantime there will be a golden era that we can enjoy. The new society could very well be monarchical or otherwise undemocratic, since those types of systems seem to promote manliness more than democratic systems, which are arguably feminine in nature. Democracy is about diffusion of responsibility among the legislators, much like what foids do whenever anyone tries to hold them accountable.

The cool thing is, you don't necessarily have to do anything to make the incelocalypse happen. You just have to watch the signs of the impending collapse and at the appropriate time, make the preparations to survive and be in a good position to scoop up that jailbait pussy when it becomes available. Till then, it's mostly just a matter of LDAR'ing or whatever.

Now, am I just saying all this to try to cope with the fact that I can't be in politics anymore, and am unlikely to go ER? Maybe. But it seems like almost everyone else is the same way. Maybe as we get closer to the incelocalypse, and the state's grip on power begins to weaken, and perhaps the means of providing food and other necessities to the people begins to break down, there will be more ERs and Minassians. Like communism, feminism is an egalitarian system that has unlimited potential for fucking up both government and private industry, so I wouldn't rule out such possibilities.

CroMagnonBoy and other incels #sexist #psycho incels.co

Should beta cucks be turned into women?

In this hypothetical situation, the technology for turning men into full biological women exists. The vagina and ovaries can be grown using your own DNA, and feminizing effects take place within a month at the most.

We all know that these spineless, ball-less losers are beyond saving. These same losers advocate for women to have total and full dominion over men. Although they are for the most part small, pathetic, and harmless, they are a step above women due to the small presence of testosterone in their blood. And what makes this slightly more concerning is that they make up a majority of men, and hold positions of power. They are responsible for everything to do with feminism and female empowerment. In other words, they are our worst enemy. They caused our inceldom with hypergamy and dysgenics.

Since we as incels crave females, and there are plenty of failed "men" , how would you feel about turning these low t losers into cum-sluts on a mass scale? If you think about it, these cucks would love being a woman. They love being submissive, sucking and taking the cock, and they want to be cucked. Wouldn't that be just perfect on a woman? A girl who wants to watch you fuck another girl hard, then have her holes filled with your dick?

It would also solve the gender ratio hugely. Since it would convert so many "men" into women, men would hardly ever have troubles getting a girlfriend

Poll: Should beta cucks be turned into women?
<table>

Allow them to have the option to 6 votes 18.8%
Force them to turn into women or face death row 20 votes 62.5%
No 6 votes 18.8%

Some incels #sexist reddit.com

Re: Why even try as a manlet

image

(Nigrum-Turcam)
They aren't like this in real life, especially if they have no buddies around to back them up. If I was even a quarter as cruel as them I would bully them into submission but I don't. It's all so tiresome.

(Incelebrity)
and if fake-up was banned they would be their timid selves a lot more too

ever seen some foids irl without makeup? they dont act up for shit because they know they look ill in comparison to their usual masked selves

(IqRaterMan)

A lot of insecure women gravitate to social media specifically for validation, and taking the piss out of men for things we cant control is a great, socially acceptable way for them to achieve some validation with minimal risk from other like minded insecure women. Lots of men would do the same thing, but its not socially acceptable for men to "body shame" women. Nobody checks women for seeking validation and approval this way, so they gravitate towards this method as it is a low effort way for them feel better about themselves.

When it comes to people like her, its better to take their opinions for granted. Insecure height queens like this are an extremely vocal minority of women that are distorting how most women actually look at men. Most of the time if a girl likes your face and how you carry yourself she wont care about your height.

For a second I thought this was r/short or something, these are cope levels that shouldn't be possible. All women care immensely about your height. I actually haven't met a single woman in over two decades who has answered even "maybe" to the question "would you date someone your height or shorter?"

(Watchwhattheydo2)
The only way a short guy can attract foids is if he’s really good looking, or has a big dick, or is famous/high status. Otherwise it’s betabux.

Normal regular short guys all struggle immensely with women unless they betabux an alpha widow, and even now that’s less common as chad harems/poly relationships are beginning to normalize.

Women don’t want no short short man, they hate them and seriously see them as inferior. All foids see short men as a fate reserved for inferior women who lost at the game of love and are forced to settle. If a male is short, he seriously isn’t even a real man to women.

I went through his post history, at the least he’s delusional, at most he’s humble bragging about his success with women.

The worst part about being a shortcel is that both inceltears and braincels deny the heightpill. You're the ones coping: https://old.reddit.com/r/Braincels/comments/a3hq0u/the_ultimate_heightpill_compilation/

All women care about is how big a man is, how good looking a man’s face is, how big his dick is, and how much money he has. Lmao men need to wake the fuck up, women don’t love men.

It’s more important to be tall or well hung than it is to be a good person when it comes to attracting women. The fact that the exact opposite is what people want to believe is pure women are wonderful effect delusion.

Men are trying to deny what’s plainly in front of their faces lmao. Men need to wake the fuck up.

(Votetojudge)

Tell me how what I said is cope.

Because most women by far are like the woman in this post and you don’t want to believe it.

If men started body shaming women, guys would pop up to defend women. Women dont defend short guys because they are silently agreeing. If this foid was talking about tall men in a derogatory way other women would probably shame her.

You are in denial, most modern women literally value men as status objects and height is a big part of a man’s status to women, particularly today. If a guy is short today, almost all women disqualify him right off the bat, because his stature prevents them from getting the status out of a bf they all feel they deserve.

SkinjobCatastrophe #sexist #psycho incels.co

[It's Over] Women are not evil, they are even worse than evil

I have placed a tl;dr at the bottom for your edification if you dont want to ingest this ludicrously verbose wall of text

I am so tired of women. They poison EVERYTHING with their entitlement, terrible attitudes, bullying, lookism, and subconscious manipulating of men. They are so empty and lifeless. They have no soul. You can see it in their eyes - there is nothing there. No passion, no desire, no purpose, no meaning, no morals or even common decency. They are just soulless husks of people. Completely empty, without even the substance of a ball of dust.

If they were truly evil then there would be something to fight against. We could point and say, THERE is the problem! THAT is the source of our suffering, our oppression, that is why we experience the bullshit we do on a daily basis. But there is nothing to women, they are empty, so we cant point at anything.

The real source of our suffering is the men who work on womens behalf - but what is it that women want? Most men dont know what women want and even women dont know what they want. Women say what they want, and then men do all the heavy lifting to make sure that happens, but then what? Women complain and say thats not what they wanted and that men are the source of all their problems. But what are these problems? They are not actually problems, women like these things, many of which women have created for themselves, but then they complain about them and a man rushes to do their bidding like a slave minion.

So women complain about “problems” that they actually like - for example, being given attention for their looks, or as they call it, being “objectified”. Then, men rush to do whatever the women want done. Being men, they are able to listen and follow instructions very well, and so they do exactly as they are told, and then what? The women complain. “All women are beautiful, why havent you told them that they are pretty? They are not just your tools to use for working and, they want to feel pretty and sexually desirable too!”

And then the cycle either repeats, or more often, creates a ludicrously more complex system of interwoven bullshit that soyboys have to keep track of just to appease their female masters. “All women are beautiful! B-but- their looks dont matter! They work just as hard or harder than men! But men and women are equal! Except we need to give them special privileges and help them because they can't do it on their own! But they are strong and can do anything without a mans help!” Etc.

Many would say to blame these men who enable women and do their bidding, and I would agree. But just like everyone on this forum, men want to be with women. Some men are lucky enough to get to be with very attractive women, some can only get with landwhales, and some, like us, are left with nothing. If everyone wants to be with women, how can we do away with these problems?

Many people say that we need a more traditional culture that places women in the position of household caretakers as a requirement and keeps them out of the workforce and any position of power. But in this society, romance and mate competition would still enable womens behaviors. Just as it did even long ago in america and europe or even a very long time ago in ancient greece. Competition over women is a main source of these problems. Men will step over each other and hurt each other to gain access to higher value females. They will subvert, manipulate, and of course directly physically attack other men to win the attention of females. Women like this and encourage it, and we would be directly back to the root problem - men hurting each other and causing wide scale societal problems to appease women.

Let us say that we have a muslim state type society. There women are removed almost entirely from all public interactions. Marriages are largely arranged and many times you cannot even see the woman because of full body and face coverings. But then we arise at yet another problem. Men want to have sex and be with attractive women, of course, so what happens to these emotions and pent up feelings that are hardwired into the brain like hunger and thirst? Well, nothing good, obviously. Muslim states are not known for their peaceful and diplomatic nature. Men are angry and can only cope with other things, even if they have a wife and kids.

A mans sex drive can never be done away with. It cannot be suppressed. It is like thirst or hunger, it will be there until the day he dies. So what is the solution that can make the most people happy and let men finally have sexual contact? Well there is none. At least, there is not a good solution. Nature is cruel and cares nothing about morals or fairness.

Roughly 50 percent of males from the history of the human race likely never mated. Nature is designed to put a few men at the top and leave the rest of the men either fighting for scraps or suffering with nothing. You cant fight nature, its like stopping a hurricane with a fan or melting Antarctica with a space heater. These are not solvable problems.

It would be best if people accepted that the world is imperfect and did the best that we could instead of acting like if we could institute some massive social or cultural change that inceldom would be fixed. I cannot change the nature of humans. It always has been and it always will be over for many men.

When I say women are not evil, they are even worse, I mean that they are responsible, in a way, for an unsolvable problem. They are so empty and lifeless that they cannot be the ones responsible - men are. But even if we were to kill every soyboy and cuck and IT poster, the problem will still exist. Men would fight over women, they would hurt each other for women. All men want sex and female attention/companionship. But women are the source of these problems.

Its as if your only food source was poisoned potatoes. You have to eat them, but when you do they damage your body and put you in great pain. But you can never be not hungry. You will always want to eat them even though you know they will hurt you. You cannot think “these will cause me pain - so therefore I shouldnt want them and I will not be hungry”. You will ALWAYS be hungry if you dont eat, that is all there is to it. And you will always want women even though you know how terrible they are

Although maybe .0000000001% of the world population can take a step back and realize that fighting over women and simping for women is just a terrible idea, most cant. Even super geniuses who design particle accelerators do these things. Even intelligence cant help. Although intelligence has been has been used to solve just about every other problem throughout history, this problem is too much.

Tl;dr ITS OVER

Sparrow's Song #sexist incels.co

We cannot restore the old patriarchy, it wouldn't fix our faces anyway... We need a Neo-Patriarchy.

Consider a society with nationalized healthcare, facial surgery for anyone who needs it, artificial wombs for anyone who wants them, realistic and affordable waifubots that are superior to foids in every way... This would be a patriarchal society that femasites could not complain about because since we would have no use for them, they would not be "oppressed". We could build a wall and outside of our advanced society, the current, barbaric, matriarchal cuckold society can remain intact as long as it can support itself.

This might sound gay but hear me out... Ectogenesis will be available soon, but CRISPR will still be very expensive. Males, with ectogenesis and stem cell technology, can reproduce asexually, one drop of blood can produce sperm or eggs in a lab. If you want to reproduce asexually but cannot afford to modify your genes with CRISPR, you will have the option of starting a "bromance" family with another straight male who's genetics would combine favorably with yours. This is not traditional by any means, but this is better than cuckolding, telegony, and allowing your bloodline to end with you. I would argue that today's femasites are so selfish and barbaric, that a child raised by two straight males in a "bromance" household would have a better upbringing than a child raised by a single mother who ignores it's cries while passed out in a puddle of chad cum surrounded by empty Smirnoff Ice bottles and Xanax pills. In reality, these children would have FOUR parents as opposed to ONE single mother because not only would the child have two bro dads but it would have two waifubot mothers as well. The bros can sustain a population by fathering two children each, you would have one child made from your sperm and your bro's egg and one child from your egg and you bro's sperm.

To make our society fair for femoids, we would not have only sons, daughters would be born in even number to sons. However, all sex between humans would be illegal, men are only allowed to fuck waifubots and foids are only allowed to fuck chadbots. The punishment for having sex with another human is exile, violators would be forcefully removed and left on the other side of the wall to join the roasties, cucks, and chads. Sex between humans is an act of violence towards the genes of other humans who are not having sex, the root of all evil humans do to other humans is sexual reproduction and sexual competition, therefore sex between two humans is seen as the most severe form of barbarism and forbidden in our advanced and merciful society. We would even allow people to leave without violating the sex rule if they wish, they would be educated about how our society works versus how the chad harem/cuckold society on the other side of the wall works and would be free to choose which society they want to live in at 14.

Even without the wall or separate societies, we should be pushing for bromance households, waifubots, and artificial wombs. We are not trying to "oppress" femoids or "make them obsolete", we are simply trying become sexually and reproductively independent from them. Sub8 males and LGBT people deserve dignified options for reproduction and family starting. If the foids say "asexual reproduction is misogynistic", we can say "you've made yourselves independent from men and in charge of your own reproduction, we deserve to be independent from femasites and in charge of our own reproduction"... If the conservacucks say "a family is only for a man and a woman and should only be started through natural means", we can say "silly bigot, don't force your outdated cultural norms on us, times have changed, it's the 21st century"... If the foids and cucks say "it's not natural to have sex with a robot", we can say "being robosexual isn't a choice, I was born this way, robosexuals are people too and deserve as much rights as anyone else, stop trying to oppress us, bigots"...

TL;DR:
We cannot go back to the old patriarchy, the masses will never accept it because they are too cucked. Even if we could, the arranged marriage foids wouldn't be attracted to us and would lust after chads anyway. The only way to win is to be more progressive than the progressives, we need to be sexually and reproductively independent from femoids. The so called "progressives" have no reason to oppose this, it doesn't negatively affect foids in anyway and it helps LGBT people. The current ideal family unit in The West is a single mother roastie and her neglected bastards or a landwhale cumslut and her soon to be divorced raped cuck hubby hanging from the ceiling in the other room by an electrical cord while the bastard child plays fortnite on mommy's phone aka chad summoning device. The future ideal happy family will be two bromosexuals on NEETbux taking bong hits on the couch and playing vidya while their waifubots do all the housework and get their genetically superior, asexually created children ready for school.

Nathan Larson #fundie larsonfordelegate.com

Whitney Cummings once said, "Porn isn't bad. Men watching porn is like women watching The Food Network: we're both watching things we're never going to freaking do." Feminists led the efforts to ban child pornography in the late 1970s, and will continue trying to demonize men for indulging their curiosity in, or getting aroused by, "deviant" forms of sexuality, and for exploiting women, even as women (especially feminist women, who often are excited by rape fantasies — not that there's anything wrong with that) indulge in their own violent, sadomasochistic pornography by reading Fifty Shades of Grey. It's hypocritical and a double standard.

Feminists have even gotten porn involving 17-year-old girls declared "child pornography," despite the fact that these girls would, until very recently, have been considered nubile (i.e. of marriageable age), rather than children. It is just another way of shaming men for having normal sexual desires. Young women are at the peak of their fertile years, so it is natural for men to want to have sex with them, and understandable that some men would resort to pornography as a more easily obtainable substitute.

In a way, it shouldn't be all that surprising that some men want to have sex even with girls who haven't reached puberty. There are, after all, men who will have sex with women (e.g. the wife they've been married to for 30 years) who are so old as to be infertile, so why wouldn't there be men who would have sex with girls who are too young to be fertile? It's been theorized that sex serves a number of purposes besides reproduction (for example, giving couples another reason to stay together to raise their children). It doesn't seem all that farfetched that, in the race among men to be the first to get the youngest and freshest girls as they come on the market, some men would end up going so far as to go for prepubescent girls, erring on the side of too young rather than too old.

There's also Rule 34, "If it exists, there's porn of it"; for whatever reason, the human mind seems to have a limitless ability to fetishize anything. "Normal" people download videos of bukkake and Roman showers, yet somehow child porn is deviant? These distinctions are political, not scientific. As Darian Meacham's Medicine and Society, New Perspectives in Continental Philosophy notes, "Immediately after the APA board's decision to delete homosexuality from their manual, Irving Bieber publicly asked Spitzer whether he would consider deleting other sexual deviations from DSM, too. Spitzer answered: 'I haven't given much thought to [these problems] and perhaps that is because the voyeurs and the fetishists have not yet organized themselves and forced us to do that'."

It also shouldn't be too surprising that some men are attracted to young boys. According to the Super Gay Uncles Theory, one reason for homosexuality's existence might be so that there are extra men around to provide nurturance to children in their extended families. Wouldn't pedophilic desires for boys tend to create an incentive to provide even more nurturance, as a form of child grooming (which some pederasts have likened to heterosexual dating, in which the wealthier older man pays for the dates)? This is the basic thrust of the classic essay, The Descent of Chester.

AccountError #sexist incels.co

[Blackpill] Foids would be anti- refugees if we only let in foreign foids

Foids win with the current refugee crisis, it's overwhelmingly men which means more competition for men, inflated pussy value and more chaddams. If however, we switched the ratio of men and women refugees, pussy value would crash to the floor and men would be the ones with the upper hand, think of it as a reversed China

Sparrow's Song #sexist #crackpot #psycho incels.co

[Serious] Is cooming in a femasite's mouth a form of femdom?

Not cooming in a femasite when raping/fucking her, that is just reproduction. Blowjobs are different because the mouth is not a sex organ and does not sexually tingle. So getting a blowjob is like getting dominated by a foid to some degree because she is in control of your pp and makes you feel feel ding tingles without receiving cunt rumbles at the same time. I don't know what it feels like, but I imagine it feels like getting tickled by the babysitter as a kid, which was emasculating. I remember the babysitter would tickle me and I would squirm and although it didn't feel unpleasant, I hated it because someone could just touch me a certain way and make my body feel sensations that strong, it makes you feel weak and powerless. It was even worse when they wouldn't stop until I said "uncle". So getting head is basically a foid using her mouth to tickle your peen and cooming in her mouth is like saying "uncle" and tapping out. It's different from cooming in a toilet's penetration canal because her vagina is just the flesh sleeve you used to shoot your DNA into her eggs, your hip thrusts are what led to the cooming. Is getting a blowjob giving foids more power?

I still want to put my boner in a hole's mouth, I just don't want her to think she ever had control or power over my body. If I was getting my dick sucked, I would try to avoid squirming as much as possible and I would keep an expressionless, statue face the whole time so she wouldn't know the power level of her throat game. When I would be about to nut, I would pull out and thrust her pussy until I coomed in her so it would be my hip thrusts that made me coom and not her own work with her mouth, that way she wouldn't feel like she defeated me in some way. The best solution would be to unhinge her jaw like a snake and throat rape her as if her throat was a cunt, because then you would be in control.

MAP Biology #sexist mapbiology.wordpress.com

Where this line of argument goes wrong is that the issue isn’t whether the adolescent years is the best age for a girl to become a MOTHER but rather whether it’s the best age for her to become a WIFE. If a man acquired a 12 or 14yo wife she wouldn’t typically start reproducing at that age but rather several years later at about 17. That’s the whole point. In order to monopolise a girl’s reproductive lifespan and get as many offspring from her as possible a man needed to acquire her some time before she started reproducing. There would be rare cases where a man’s wife got pregnant at 12 or 14 and died in childbirth or something but this isn’t what would TYPICALLY happen. The few cases of early pregnancy wouldn’t have made it maladaptive for men to form sexual relationships with adolescent girls anymore than the rare cases of people choking to death eating steaks would have made it maladaptive to eat meat.

What we want to know is the reproductive success of the males as a function of the age of the females they pursue and acquire: are men who acquire 14yo wives more or less reproductively successful than men who acquire 20yo wives etc? What those statistics show is the reproductive success of the females as a function of the age at which they start reproducing. They’ve got the wrong statistics and it’s really fucking laughable. The statistics only show that it would be maladaptive for girls to start reproducing in their pubescent years. They tell us nothing about the reproductive success of men who acquired pubescent girls as wives.

In prehistoric societies the typical 20yo would have already had a baby or two and started using up her fertile years. The typical 14yo would still be nulliparous and have all her fertile years ahead of her. Men who acquired 14yo wives would have got more offspring from them than men who acquired 20yo wives. It’s not complicated.

mantrad & Sockerpiller #sexist reddit.com

Normie fails thrice in guessing the reason we're single

image

(mantrad)
Foids are literally unable to understand that some people don't have romantic relationships at all. It's so foreign for them.

Its like rich people wondering why poor people don't buy a brand new Mercedes. They ask themselves hmm, maybe they like Ferrari better?!

(Sockerpiller)
Let them eat cake.

No but really, foids think that men who struggle romantically have too high standards and for fucks sake it's just such a classic example of simple projection. They think that just because they struggle to get into chads pants once in a while that it means that incels just have to stop chasing Stacy.

Here's a newflash, most incels are realists and understand how laughably futile that would be and the only reason foids think men do this is because they do it themselves. The difference is that most women can fuck hot guys while many men can't fuck anything at all.

Silverandgold #sexist #psycho incels.co

[Serious] Honestly, rape isn’t that bad

Even when I was younger and more of a normal man, not a sexually frustrated nihilistic misanthrope, I didn’t think rape was that bad. I thought it was wrong, like stealing a loaf of bread or maybe an expensive TV at worst, but I never thought it was a crime worthy of jail time. I never thought it was a crime that was unforgivable. I always thought it was ridiculous when rapists got lumped in with murderers and child molesters. Rape is really not that serious. Women just don’t like it because the men are ugly. If I was raped by an ugly woman, I would take it as a compliment. Now if she was really fat, elderly, and had smelly genitals that she forced me under gunpoint to lick, I would be mad. I would probably vomit. But I wouldn’t be traumatized for life or believe that the woman deserves to be in prison for 10 years. A hefty fine would be enough. Women who get raped are no virgins. women who get raped have sex with at least 10 men by age 20 so how is it traumatic to take just one more penis? It’s not. Women have too much time on their hands to dwell on things and become neurotic about unimportant situations. If women were in a tribe, they would get raped all the time and wouldn’t even care anymore after one point because they would have more important things to worry about like surviving in the harsh environment. By the way, I don’t want to rape anyone. It wouldn’t turn me on to be with someone who is repulsed by me. I Would never rape someone even if I could get away with it. I’m just thinking out loud. Rape isn’t that bad. By the way, I know a woman who got raped by a black man when she was a teenager and she turned out okay. She is a happy wife and mom now of 3 kids.

various MRAs #sexist reddit.com

Re: Karen Straughan on why Mens Rights is so difficult.

(DavidByron2)
You need to have a minimal amount of sympathy for a protest to work and men don't have it. It's the same as you wouldn't try to hold a rally for the rights of rapists or pedophiles and expect much good from it. Well feminism has made men about as sympathetic as rapists and pedophiles and often identified all men as rapists and pedophiles.

Another analogy would be like getting Jews to hold a big rally in Nazi Germany. It would be seen as disgusting and it would be attacked as dangerous.

(biscuitgravy)
The problem is exacerbated by the fact that men don't even have sympathy for themselves. Men are the most effective and motivated haters and killers of men. That subverts all of the traditional self-interest routes to popular organization.

The only thing that makes a regular guy organize with MRAs is total alienation by a gynocentric society. Not even facing death will make him leave gynocentrism in some cases. Guys volunteer to die all the time to protect a woman's honor. They have to meet with something totally intolerable. Something much greater than themselves, to even think of addressing their own problems. Usually, it's their children. But Feminists have secured the right to those as well.

(tenchineuro)

It's why when we approach the mainstream, we have to frame a LOT of men's rights issues in terms of how helping men helps women and children, or society, rather than how we should be helping men for their own sake. Convince people that men are utilities who should be cared for and maintained so they can and are willing continue to be of use

This is how we got where we are now, by being of use and not people in our own right. Men are tools, not human beings, I won't agree with that and that approach won't get men treated as anything but tools.

I have a great deal of respect for Karen, but I think she's off the beam with this.

(0x123d)

why no disobedience

Because we have jobs.

why is MRA so unpalatable

Because of how our species evolved. Girls > women > boys > pets > inanimate objects > men.Because of how our species evolved. Girls > women > boys > pets > inanimate objects > men.

(Elvick)
Think it's more women > girls > pets > boys > objects > men

With an argument that objects could come before boys even. And depending on the age range we're talking for "boy" it's as easy as domestic violence shelters turning away boys of a certain age because they could be "dangerous".

Women can make more children. Nature didn't guarantee girls would make it to child bearing years. So women were more valuable than girls. Women having more children was a more reasonable assumption than girls not dying from disease. It made sense.

Hell, vagina monologues has the rape of a 13 year old girl by a 20-something year old woman who plies the barely teenager with alcohol. And it's lauded as some great feminist text. A certain vile celebrity whose name I won't utter, molested her sister for years and she still has a career in Hollywood. The internet hates her, and rightfully spreads the information every time she's given a platform somewhere. But it hardly undoes anything.

Probably more examples. But women are definitely placed above even girls.

(mwobuddy)
There's actually a few reasons why its so difficult and its easy to sum up.

Conflation. "oh, so you're against women"? A typical argument.

Denial. "you think men don't have equal rights or protection in law, that's cute".

imprecise language. "you think there is no rape culture but I know plenty of women who've been raped". Both can be true, but rape culture is proven by "rape victims" while your definition of rape culture is "a culture that tells people explicitly to go out and rape women". Imprecise language is a problem for all sides in any argument, and is perhaps the most important issue. Its why you absolutely need to ask someone to declare specifically what they mean when they use a term or a phrase. You may be accused of pedantry, but this is often a tactic of obfuscation to say your side is inherently illegitimate.

These three are used in a motte and bailey tactic of every single men's rights debate.

(Wisemanner)
I think carefully thought out resistance to the system will have an effect, and there is some evidence that this is increasing; examples being men refusing to go to the aid of women; MGTOW; and men refusing to marry.

I would suggest at least the following be practised.

Pay as little tax as possible. Most tax is spent on women, with, in the UK, about twice as much spent on women's healthcare, and three times as much spend on research into their cancers. (Even though women live longer.)

Do not go to the aid of women, The police will arrest you in an instant if there is any mistake or confusion.

Do not help the police except where you are actually helping another male or yourself. These are, after all, the enablers and helpers of feminism, and the thugs who hammer a man's door at six am simply on the word of a woman.

Do not marry. The whole system is rigged to get the husband to pay the living expenses of the wife even when she no longer wants to have anything to do with him.

5.Do not vote Socialist in the UK. The other parties are not much better, but the Labour Party is feminist-infested.

There is almost certainly much more.

(lacandib)
The civil disobedience/protest route could work but it would have to led by women.

(The_Best_01)

Why?

Because evidently, society listens more to women. In the best-case scenario, it would be led by men and women.

(Elvick)
Because men are viewed as dangerous in those circumstances... look at the arguments against men's spaces and clubs. It's always about how it's dangerous. And that's just a private space or a club on campus.

An entire protest filled of men wouldn't go over any differently. Did you even read Karen's comment? She talks about how society views men as dangerous in there.

W. F. Price #sexist web.archive.org

[Most of the quote is vulgar-libertarian pablum, emphasis added where Price contradicts everything he and his faction have said about women working and "hypergamy"]

There are a lot of problems with the bill, with one of the most important ones being that so-called qualifications don’t always reflect how well someone does a job, or how valuable they are as an employee. Business is about making money, and employers generally don’t care about sex as long as the profits roll in. If women really were only making 77 cents for every dollar men made and still performing the same, nobody would hire men, because they wouldn’t want to take on the extra expense.

This oft-cited statistic is fiction; when personal choices are taken into account, women and men make about the same, as one would expect. However, if the Paycheck Fairness Act is passed, women will make more than men for equivalent work, because the government will introduce a significant penalty for not paying women the same whether they produce as much or not. Women will be even more privileged as employees than they already are with affirmative action and the EEOC. They will also have another powerful tool for suing companies, and as the history of harassment lawsuits demonstrates, they will use it regularly, often at the urging of aggressive trial lawyers.

Under the new bill, HR departments will be tasked with ensuring that men who perform well do not get raises. Companies will lose ambitious, talented male workers who give up in frustration as they realize that they will never rise above a certain pay level because there’s a woman with higher “qualifications” (e.g. a master’s degree) who doesn’t make more than him.

Eventually, that’s the way these government controls will ultimately fail. Men will vote with their feet. They will leave large companies to start their own businesses or work in a field women are not interested in. Women’s wages will not increase, because companies that are bound by bad law to lower efficiency and productivity will not make enough to give them raises. Tax revenue will then decline. In the end, everyone will lose.

Finally, the idea that men don’t want women to make money is ridiculous. Most married women work, and their husbands are happy when they make more money. Can you imagine a guy telling his wife’s boss not to give her a raise? The only problem men have with these “equal pay” laws is that they end up paying for it in the office, and it artificially lowers their wages. There’s already anecdotal evidence that software companies deliberately pay women more than men to prevent lawsuits, and because money does not come from a bottomless well this means other people are getting paid less.

Sometimes it’s better to leave the state out of certain matters, because it tends to create more problems than it solves. Sometimes, it simply creates a problem where none existed in the first place. This is the sum of the Paycheck Fairness Act: just another set of problems for America’s businesses and workers.

FierceMild #fundie feministcurrent.com

It makes sense that transactivists and ‘sex worker’ rights activists would have an affinity for one another. Transactivists and pimps both blame women for men’s violence. Pimps say men wouldn’t enslave, rape, and brutalize prostituted women if feminists stopped criticizing them for it. Transactivists say that men would stop raping, brutalizing, and killing transwomen if feminists would stop criticizing them for it.

I’m 100% certain that decriminalizing pimps and brothel owners won’t stop Punters from raping and brutalizing prostituted women and children. Likewise I am 100% sure that feminists calling transwomen women wouldn stop men from killing them.

metabuxx #conspiracy #homophobia #sexist incels.co

[RageFuel] Homosexuality is being forced on us.

Has anyone here ever wondered why all gay men are low tire ugly looking betas? Foids (especially feminists) are promoting homosexuality on a large scale.

Their goal is to brain wash every single one of us betas into believing that we are gay so we end up fucking each other and won't even look at foids in the future, leave alone asking them for sex.

They start implanting these ideas in our heads as soon as puberty hits us. Most Chads I've know had their first girlfriend as early as 12 or 13. Chads are exposed to female sexuality at an early age and by doing so they are being trained to impregnate thousands of foids in the future. Whereas we are deprived of female sexuality and constantly being told by foids that homosexuality is just as normal as heterosexuality. They force these ideas on us so much that at some point we are compelled to question our own sexuality.

After 50 years it'd be illegal for betas to even think about foids. We'd be forced to fuck other men whilst the 10% of the Chads would be fucking and impregnating 100% of foids. Male on rape would be decriminalized and every single beta would be so much sexually frustrated that he'd gladly agree to fuck another guy. Chads would be out there fucking thousands of women and we'd be jerking off to gay porn.

Foids hate betas, they'd go to any length to keep us away from them even if it takes to force homosexuality on us.

Extreme vegans and David Dewey #fundie theguardian.com

Feet away from the butchers carving pork loins and beef shanks, the owners of a California meat shop have installed a peculiar sign in their window: “ATTENTION: Animals’ lives are their right. Killing them is violent and unjust, no matter how it’s done.” The odd poster seeming to discourage customers from buying their meats is the result of a months-long dispute between the owners of the Local Butcher Shop – which sells “locally sourced, sustainably raised” meat – and animal rights activists who have staged more than a dozen loud and gruesome protests outside the family-owned business in Berkeley.

With the placement of the sign, written by the activist group Direct Action Everywhere, the vegan protesters have agreed to cease their weekly rallies outside the shop, which sometimes involved nearly nude protesters dripping in fake blood and wrapped in plastic, along with recordings of pigs screaming inside a slaughterhouse.

The 15in-by-15in sign began receiving international attention this week after the activists declared victory, following four months of protests and counter-protests among liberals in the northern California college city widely known for the 1960s free speech movement and anti-war hippies. The anti-meat activists have claimed that the sign is a groundbreaking win and are now promising to target other independent merchants with similar tactics that they hope will spread across the US.

“To be threatened and forced to abide by their beliefs just makes me sad,” said co-owner Monica Rocchino as she sat outside the shop on Wednesday afternoon while customers nearby munched on the sandwich of the day. “Their tactics are really extremist … This is ethical extortion.” Rocchino and her husband, Aaron, opened the shop in 2011, promoting meats in line with a California food culture that values fresh and ethical produce.

Matt Johnson, a Direct Action Everywhere organizer, said that he and his group “challenge places that do put this ‘humane’ marketing out there. People are paying a lot more for these dead animals … They have some notion that these animals are being treated well.”

The group argues that there is no ethical way to kill animals for food and are campaigning to make Berkeley the first “city free of violence toward animals” – meaning banning the sale of meat. The Rocchinos, who partner with local farmers and offer butchery classes, reached out to the activists to find a resolution. Direct Action Everywhere leaders eventually said they would end the protests if the shop agreed to become a “vegan butcher” that did not sell any meat, or if they canceled classes.

Unwilling to sacrifice their entire business, the owners later agreed to a third option: a sign condemning the killing of animals. The activists made two additional concessions: the sign could be three inches smaller than they originally proposed and the shop could place it in a slightly less prominent storefront window. But they said they reserved the right to two protests a year, and that the agreement was “temporary”.

“We want businesses and our culture to face the truth about violence against animals,” said Paul Darwin Picklesimer, an activist who negotiated the agreement, adding: “We do feel that animals are people. We don’t feel that only humans are people, but of course it’s not universally accepted.” The attack on the Berkeley shop and threats of similar protests have sparked backlash across the state.

“I don’t understand why activists would pick on a mom-and-pop shop supporting the most humane farmers, rather than the animal factories and meatpackers responsible for brutality on an unimaginably greater scale,” said Michael Pollan, the well-known American food writer and a University of California, Berkeley professor, in an email. “Unless you believe the complete abolition of meat-eating is a realistic goal, attacking this sector of the animal economy … strikes me as misguided.”

There is a McDonald’s a few blocks away, he added. David Dewey, president of the California Association of Meat Processors, blamed cartoons for making children believe that animals have emotions and feelings. He added: “This is the order of things, even in the wild. Fish eat other fish. Birds eat other birds … That’s just the way the world circles.”

Johnson said the sign was meant to stigmatize meat-eating in the way tobacco warnings discouraged smoking. “Our vision of the world is a world in which every animal has a right to live happy, safe and free as humans by and large do,” he said.

Asked about the rights of humans who aren’t safe and free, such as prisoners, Johnson said: “It’s a form of deflection. It’s a way of not thinking about the issue at hand.”

“I feel like anybody coming here already knows where their meat comes from,” said Ariel Lay, 28, who decided to visit the shop for the first time after reading about the controversy. “They are not going to look at the sign and say, ‘Oh, I had no idea!’” In between bites of her roast beef sandwich, she added, “The whole, ‘We are not going to stop until Berkeley is a vegan city’ thing rubbed me the wrong way. You’re not going to tell me what to eat.”

Richard Healey, a 74-year-old not-for-profit consultant, who works next door to the shop and buys lunch there twice a week, said he suspected people wouldn’t read the poster and that regular customers would continue to be drawn to the delicious meats. “I didn’t even know it was there until someone pointed it out,” he said, adding, “These people make great sandwiches. I think about it and my mouth waters.”

Carl Gallups #fundie wnd.com

When we ingest other living things, the DNA of those living things (fruits, vegetables, nuts, meats, etc.) just happens to be compatible with our DNA so that cellular respiration can take place. If it were not for the fact that our DNA is so akin to all other living things, we could not eat. If we could not eat, we would die.

Is the process of eating and cellular respiration the result of a mere fluke of evolution? Alternatively, could it be that a common Designer made certain that the process of eating and cellular respiration would function in such a precise and perfect manner? Which answer appears to be the most probable to you?

If the supposed cosmic and random happenstance of evolution was the real reason that all living things exist, why, when, and how did this happenstance mechanism decide that living things needed to eat anything in the first place? Would it not be odd that evolution should come up with the idea of food and energy creation through cellular respiration?

Cellular respiration is an astoundingly complex, energy-expending system. Yet in order for life to be sustained, living things must have other living things to ingest. What an odd thing for a mere cosmic coincidence to develop, by random generation. Is it not a strange convenience for evolution that all living things have such unimaginable DNA similarity that cellular respiration is possible?

Rebbitzin Tzviya Eliyahu #fundie failedmessiah.typepad.com

Rebbitzin Tzviya Eliyahu is the the widow of the late Sefardi Chief Rabbi of Israel Mordechai Eliyahu and the mother of the Chief Rabbi of Sefat Shmuel Eliyahu.

Her son Shmuel is a noted racist.

Her late husband Mordechai was a terrorist who was convicted and jailed as a young man for trying to overthrow the elected Government of Israel by force and replace it with a theocracy. He was eventually pardoned, released years early from prison, and later rose to become Chief Rabbi of Israel –all despite being completely unrepentant.

Recently, Tzviya Eliyahu said publicly that she believes any store or restaurant that has Arab employees should not be given hashgacha (a kosher supervision seal), Yeshiva World reported. She reportedly said that in part because of this issue, she only eats home cooked food, and will not eat at events or on planes.

“We took fruit and crackers along when we traveled” she said of her travels with her late husband.

They did that because her late husband was extremely stringent and did not eat anywhere [but their home]. He would only eat pita bread baked by the Nehama Bakery because the it did not employ Arabs, who he considered dirty.

“[My husband saw how Arab workers] would wipe their noses and this too was in the [pita] dough. He ran home immediately and never returned [to an unnamed bakery] and told me ‘Rabbanit, you are never to buy from this bakery again, simple as that,’” she said.

On another occasion, a woman who worked in a famous bakery came to her and said she saw Arabs make dough and then drag it along the floor of the kitchen.

“I was the only one there who saw this. I told you not to eat a thing from this bakery for this is what the Arabs do. Look at the evil, look at the hate. They do this out of hate,” the woman allegedly said.

Tzviya Eliyahu insisted Jews should only buy food from God-fearing Jews. There is no trusting a goy [an often derogatory term for a non-Jew], “even in his grave,” she said, because all goyyim all hate Jews and a goy “cannot maintain kosher standards for me. Don’t ask me why the [state] Rabbinate gives hashgacha [kosher supervision] to these stores [that employ Arabs]. On the days the rabbis come around to check [the bakeries and restaurants] they [the Arab workers] do not do such things [and instead act] as if they care [about their jobs and keeping the food kosher and safe to eat].”

Of course, when buying fish or meat, Jews must be even more stringent, Mrs. Eliyahu said.

“Certainly one must only buy from a trustworthy Jew. The rav [her late husband] only ate poultry that was kosher slaughtered here at home in my kitchen. The rav checked the chicken [himself] to make sure it was okay as well as checking the knife before shechita. We did the salting and soaking here too. The children and grandchildren saw the chickens running around before shechita. One explained he no longer wanted to eat poultry. It was a real nuthouse in the kitchen once, when we [did not have] chicken for three months. Our shochet [kosher slaughterer; the only kosher slaughterer Mordechai Eliyahu trusted] traveled abroad every few months and we had just run out of chicken [when he left]. So we did without. Either a person lives by his principles or not. Either one has fear of God or not…”

Even so, when Eliyahu was Chief Rabbi of Israel, the Chief Rabbinate put its seal on hundreds of kosher products, including chicken, that the chief rabbi himself would not eat or allow his family to eat.

BabyFuck McGirlsex #sexist #crackpot #dunning-kruger incels.co

[Based] The VAGINA is the filthiest place in the entire Milky Way Galaxy

* The vagina is a very filthy organ in and of itself with a lot of nasty flora and fauna resident therein
* Now, imagine the Average foid in her 20's who has fucked literally 100's of chads who all cum inside her and creampie her roast beef hole
* The Clinical Anatomy & pathology science of MICROCHIMERARISM states that foids retain DNA from all the men they fucked.
* Coupled with the fact that foids dont wash inside their vaginas ("its a self cleaning system teehee") imagine just how filthy a foids pussy must be
* The degenerate sex havers who "eat pussy" are probably the reason why mouth cancers and throat cancers among other cancers have increased in recent times. Some based Scientistcel should do a study on how many Modern diseases have been created by eating filthy unwashed foid pussies tbh ngl
* I bet COVID-19 was caused when an escortcelling Wuhancel decided to JohnnySinsMaxx and eat the pussy of a Noodlewhore who hadn't washed her pussy since the day she was born and those filthy disgusting pussy juices went into his respiratory system and mutated to create COVID-19.


* TLDR : PUSSY IS FILTHY GARBAGE

metabuxx, Gymcelled & BabyFuck McGirlsex #sexist incels.co

(metabuxx)

[Blackpill] It's over for ugly men

image

r/FemaleDatingStrategy
Posted by u/EAT_MY_ASS_MOIDS
Woman is flooded with handsome men who want to date her. There are too many hot guys to stay stuck on any one dude. Daily reminder to take ZERO shit from losers who are easily replaceable!

r/dating
Posted bv u/thatshawtvo
Overwhelmed by dating prospects
I Need Advice
I (25F) have been a little more seriously OLDing and I am wondering how the hell to properly juggle all the guys trying to date me from OLD (This is not a bragging post I'm dead serious and need advice). I recently made the mistake of actively super-swiping and while I was excited to see the matches, now all these guys are asking to meet up. All are attractive and I want to give all of them a chance but holy hell, I'm strug- gling with fitting them all onto my schedule (Both guys I've already met asking for more dates as well as new matches wanting to meet) and I'd like some advice. Does anyone have advice on how to properly handle this situation? How do I say "Ill be busy at that time" without any of these guys taking it as "She's not interested"? How do you avoid super swiping? How to keep conversations going with all till we actually meet?

Found this one r/FemaleDatingStrategy. This whore talks about how she right swipes every hot Chad she finds on Tinder and how she wants to give to them all a taste of her rotten, used up pussy. But that's not what intrigued me because everyone knows that all a foid wants is Chad's dick filling up her holes.

The thing which did intrigue me was the other foids in the comment section asking the user where she lived. They were all complaining that there aren't any attractive guys who lived close to them who they could right swipe. One foid wrote "99.99% guys living close to me are ugly as shit". She also wrote that the secret to finding a nice guy is "swiping left on the ugly ones and swiping right on the attractive ones." Another foid pointed out that she didn't even read their profiles before right swiping, for her the only criteria was looks.

These comments are enough to conclude how much foids despise ugly men. They don't care about anything other than looks. Many attractive men are waiting in line to fuck foids so if you're ugly then you have absolutely zero chances. And all the cucks who think that working on their personality is gonna help them get laid, FOIDS DON'T FUCKING CARE ABOUT IT. If a guy is ugly then he is a just a disgusting creep and biological waste for them. No one cares about ugly men, not even ugly foids because Chads fuck them too.

(Gymcelled)

Gotta love /r/FDS. Its the only space on the interwebs where whores think out loud. No virtue signalling, no manipulation. Just foids being foids.

And we're still the delusional ones according to normies, we're the hateful ones, we're the ones making shit up.

(BabyFuck McGirlsex)

Thats a Hiroshima Nagasaki blackpill
Foids are degenerate eugenicists - but ironically ugly foids are celebrated by society(no fat shaming teehee) and degenerate foids are celebrated by society (no slut shaming teehee) incompetent foids are celebrated by society (diversity hire! Teeheee)
Foids hold men to extremely high standards that they themselves cant measure up to and cant ever attain themselves ( a 2/10 roastie demands nothing less than 8/10 chadlite jfl)

Its Over boyos

RHJunior #sexist rhjunior.livejournal.com

Back when the fight for women to get the vote was underway, it was met with considerable hostility... as the caricatures above illustrate. Those for the women's vote had an ethical point: any person who bore the responsibilities of citizenship (paying taxes, serving jury duty, otherwise demonstrating civic responsibility) ought to also have the rights of citizenship (voting, etc.)
But those opposed to it had some arguments of their own. Firstly that women and men had different natural roles in society, and that it went poorly for society when women tried to take over a man's duties (and voting was seen as a man's duty.) Secondly they argued women would pursue irrational political behavior-- voting based not on objective national interests but on feminine, maternal and emotional desires, and would be unwilling to make the harder decisions often required of those in politics.
Not merely that they would make poor voting decisions, but that they would use the suffrage movement as a toe in the door... that once they had the vote, then the more radical elements that had already begun associating themselves with the Women's Rights movement in general would move in. The demands would come more frequently, more strident, and more onerous-- that men would be pushed aside from their role as providers, breadwinners and heads of their households, that women would use their political influence to henpeck and legally subjugate men, that the family unit would be turned amuck or even torn asunder as women "went off the rails."
Such arguments were finally overruled, and women in America were given the vote in 1920.

Now, though, comes the question none dare ask. Look around and ask yourself: Were they wrong?

From the moment feminists got the vote, the demands indeed have come hard and fast. Women in America have every single right that men do, **and more.** They enjoy legal protections and privileges that men would never dare dream of, and are excused from the obligatory responsibilities that men are still expected to bear-- for instance supporting and raising a child, or serving on average twice the sentence for the same crime, or being drafted and dying in a war... yet the demands never ceased. They only grow louder, and shriller, and more frequent, and more insane.

Not one year past we had an entire political movement built by feminists around getting one of the crookedest, dirtiest, most bigoted and reprehensible politicians in America elected to the highest office in the land, SOLELY BECAUSE IT WAS FEMALE. There are hundreds, maybe even thousands of men serving prison sentences right now for sex crimes they never committed, solely on the word of a woman--- every other week is a new story where a man has to be let out of jail after years or decades because they caught the woman out in a lie. Reproductive rights? A woman can flush the pills and poke a hole in the condom, get pregnant, and the courts will force him to pay either for child care or for the abortion-- and the decision of which is solely and entirely HERS. He gets no say. Prenuptuals? She can get those overthrown at the drop of a hat with a sympathetic divorce judge-- and they're all sympathetic. And still these feminists have the audacity to say, over and over, that they are OPPRESSED. We've had women-- teachers!-- going online and proclaiming that mathematics is inherently sexist. They're out there in the streets DRESSED AS VAGINAS, complaining that it's sexist that their women's studies doesn't get them jobs as astronauts. The feminist movement seems completely dedicated to proving beyond a shadow of a possible doubt that the men who passed the 19th amendment were out of their damned minds, and nothing I've read has even hinted that this is something NEW. The only difference is that what was the fringe element of the suffragettes in 1917 has become the entire body politic of the feminist movement 100 years later.

And to judge by feminist shenanigans in Canada, England, France, etc. it's not a uniquely American proposition either.

So let's ask the question that none dare ask, that none dare answer, and even if they did would not be overheard against the background of autistic women screeching: If the anti-suffragists were wrong about the feminist movement then why in every western country, did it end up like this?

womenrimmingblackmen #racist womenrimmingblackmen.tumblr.com

Interracial Rimming has been PROVEN to be a Interracial Taboo

I know people have said that with very little proof in the past, but that was before interracial rimming where girls rim black men broke into mainstream interracial porn. Now that we are seeing it in mainstream like BLACKED & BLACKEDRAW among other sites and the sex act is becoming popular with some of our favorite adult actresses doing it with black men all of a sudden we have this group of people voicing their disgust with women rimming men. My question is where was all this disgust and opposition when Tom Byron and Seymour Butts was making it mainstream and popular or when Manuel Ferrera, James Deen and Mike Adriano began to feature it more and more in their movie titles under mainstream productions? I didn’t see anybody in porn and and I didn’t see too many fans looking to ban it or heavily criticize those guys.

Those voices were small while F to M rimming was STILL mainstream. Only when more black male performers became open to it and more Interracial sites started featuring it with black men did all of a sudden those voices decided to get LOUD!

Think about it, for only like a year now it has really become popular in interracial porn. Before that we already seen it featured among popular white males and on white porn titles like the ones from Seymour Butts, Tom Byron and Manuel Ferrera and Mike Adriano. It was and still is popular in white porn. So why doesn’t swallowed.com or Manuel Ferrera’s RAW series receive as much criticism as BLACKED, dickdrainers(who isn’t mainstream but has made it VERY popular and even featured it in his ebony scenes.) blacksonblondes and BLACKEDRAW? Well the answer is right there in the question. People have a problem with it because black men are doing it.

The white people that have a problem with it of course are just exposing how this bothers them seeing women especially white women rim a black man in a scene and the black men that have a problem with it goes back to the desexualization of black men that has been happening in our community for the longest now. Remember black men used to be known for not liking to eat pussy. Hating it in fact. Black people would criticize those black men that did eat pussy and shamed them for being "disgusting" and a nasty ass nigga in a bad sense. Black men aren’t allowed to be sexually opened and adventurous and people still feel that way. Or this wouldn’t be such a big deal, because it most certainly wasn’t when it was popular in white porn. How about we not tell people what they can and can not watch in porn if you don’t want to be told the same thing.

I usually don’t recommend entertaining the haters, but I suggest people really pay attention to this all of a sudden rise in hate for this sex act when it has been popular in white porn for so long. Because it has to do with black men, freedom and interracial sex when you take a look at the bigger picture.

#interracial #taboo #rimming

Various Incels #sexist incels.co

(KingOfRome)
[Serious] The world would be a better place if all femoids were shipped off to the sun.

Anyone agree?

(Poll)
Agree?
Yes | Votes: 12 | 66.7%
No | Votes: 6 | 33.3%

(SkinnyBaldcel)
Considering that would mean the end of humanity.. Then yes but I still want to have a foid with me so personally it wouldn't be better for myself

(Albocel)
Absolutly. Female humans are fucking vermin. All of them

(Evil Genius)
Yes.

(Mainländer)
Killing all women :no:
Sexually enslaving all women :yes:

(GameDevCel)
all the man in the planet would start hunting efeminite males to fuck, i would be like fucking jail but everywhere, considering most dudes here are bellow 6 feet and noit jacked, noo, i don't to have my ass raped by some hobo
@Mainländer

Killing all women :no:
Sexually enslaving all women :yes:

don't neet to be sexual slavering, just brainwashing them to be submissive would be a massive help

(anon)
@SkinnyBaldcel
Considering that would mean the end of humanity..

>he thinks men wouldn't figure out a way to make do without foidfilth
:soy:

(Michael5651)
Yes, end humanity.

(SkinnyBaldcel)
@anon

>he thinks men wouldn't figure out a way to make do without foidfilth
:soy:

Yea artificial insemination but if you want society to continue to exist then you are:soy:

(anon)
@SkinnyBaldcel

Yea artificial insemination but if you want society to continue to exist then you are:soy:

You are a reddit fag soyboy for thinking men need women to survive. Kill yourself, newshit.

(chesscel)
yes, but it would be better to have farms or breeding concentration camps for them so humanity doesnt die

(SecondComing)
Mankind was a mistake.

(anon)
@chesscel

yes, but it would be better to have farms or breeding concentration camps for them so humanity doesnt die

Keep 1-5% of foids alive as sex slaves.

(SkinnyBaldcel)
@anon
You are a reddit fag soyboy for thinking men need women to survive. Kill yourself, newshit.

You don't get my point, my point was that society needs to be whiped off so when all women are gone men should NOT be allowed to do anything to maintain society cause life is pointless and humans are shit you low IQ brainlet

(Red Pill Rage)
@Albocel

Absolutly. Female humans are fucking vermin. All of them

They're incel hate machines.

(Insomniac)
Yes bro.

(Life Wasted)
The world would be a better place if the sun died and took earth with it.

Canino1997 #sexist

The illusion of female equality exists due to their cocksleeves

Females are the inferior gender and they would be treated inferior to men if it wasn’t for their meat holes. They are inferior in every way. They are only better at being cock sleeves. Their main value is in that. The only thing they have over men is that. The only thing that makes them get equal or better treatment are their cock sleeves but make no mistake. They are below us. Since their sleeves are denied to us they have no value or worth to incels. Females are inferior. They need a gynocentric society and movements to stack everything in their favor to appear equal. If you think of females as equals you are already cucked. Why can they get away with this? Why does this illusion work and nobody does or says anything? It’s because of their cocksleeves. If female sexual resources wouldn’t be so overvalued or if they didn’t have vaginas would they be treated equally to men? The answer is no. They don’t sleep with lesser men to keep sex overvalued to keep their power and monopoly going. The only reason they get somewhat equal treatment is due to their cocksleeves. They appear somewhat equal to beta morons due to their cocksleeves. Their only value is as an object. Females always were objects and always will be objects. Females consciously or subconsciously like being objects because they get equal treatment out of it. Lesser men are getting played if they believe any of these illusions. They love being objects to chad but not lesser men that’s why we are all here.

Various Incels #sexist incels.co

(slimshady)

[Discussion] Foids have no personality or intellectualism: they should not be considered humans

Foids are the most shallow poeple I have ever seen. Every one of them is so shallow that I don't think they should be put on the same intellectual level as humans.

Every thing a foid does revolves around sucking upto a chad. Even if u find a foid which has some kind of philosophy or intellectualism, she will drop her intellectualism on the first sight of a chad. Suppose there is foid who says she opposes racism but she will have no problem being fucked by any racist chad. They have justification for everything. Nowadays we can see many shallow chads but at least before there were idealist chads too who didn't fuck any whore or any foid with a bad personality.

I saw a news some where that a foid re united with a rapist to tell their story to the public.

Woman reunites with rapist to tell their story together

This is just insane. This is some next level of hypocrisy. These are the same foids who put cases of molestation on any incel who just looks at them.

Problem is that foids justify their shallow behavior by anything and society helps them to do it. You would never see a foid sacrificing her life for her "love". You will never see a foid with a man whose face is burned by acid but you can it easily see it happening vice versa because there still some men who believe in "true love".

All the morals and ethics of a foid is dropped at the first sight she sees a good chad. I think that foid morals and ethics are just for keeping normies and incels away and attracting chads. Foids raised #metoo to keep low tier men from flirting with them. They say that it is to make work places safe. But this is dropped at the very first occasion when a chad flirts with them. Then it is just healthy flirting.

If a religious low tier normie proposes a foid. She rejects it by saying that she is against organized religion would not love any religious man. But if a religious chad proposes her then suddenly she becomes open to religion and says I have tolerance to religion and even religious people have love in them.

All this proves that foids don't have any intellectialism and that they are just hypocrites. They contribute absolutely nothing to develop the world or take the world forward because they have no intellectual capacity. They may have good IQ but they can only use their IQ to suck up to chads and make normies suck upto them. They can't think outside the box because their brains don't have the capacity to that. This is also the reason that they can't understand the black pill. Because understanding philosophies and social situations requires a certain intellectual capacity.

(OldIncel)

I wouldn't mind women's hypocrisy if they were at least honest about it. The problem is ALL women lie compulsively. They will tell you that they love an ugly nice guy and Chad is "too intimidating" to them. It's pure bullshit. Why do ALL WOMEN LIE? EVERY SINGLE ONE LIES. I've never seen a honest woman in my entire life. All they care about is sugarcoating things and getting social points.

(wereqryan)

Women have lost their humanity today from constant indulgence in narcissism, vanity, eugenics, and selfishness via all social media outlets. Social media has transformed women into deities and goddesses, but the goddesses themselves are addicted, unhealthy and a drain of society's resources, hence they are evil goddesses.

(based_meme)

Foids are the most shallow poeple I have ever seen. Every one of them is so shallow that I don't think they should be put on the same intellectual level as humans.

Rest assured, they're not. They may possess language and stronger CPUs than all other apes, but all of the software running on their OS is reptilian brain software.

cryptic__egg #sexist #psycho incels.co

[Serious] Why do females feel the need to show themselves in public?


In Islamic cultures foids are quite rightly expected to cover their faces in public. What foids fail to understand is that being visible is inherently sexually provocative; your body is designed to attract the opposite sex, and simply allowing men to see it is inviting them to try to have sex with you. In the case of rape foids try to argue that it is never the victims fault, but in most cases the fact that she was wearing revealing clothes is what caused the attack. By revealing her body and face, she was indirectly inviting men around her to attempt to take her. It's ridiculous that foids in the modern age try to deny that any of this is true. We know that humans will be sexually drawn to other humans of the opposite sex, so how can anyone claim that knowingly displaying yourself in public is not a sexual act?

The world would be better if foids just covered themselves. Not only would they likely be protected from the sexual advances of men that they would be teasing by showing themselves, but they make the act of showing themselves more significant for the men they do love. Nobody wants to date a foid knowing that she is on display to everyone throughout the day. Your partner is your property, not the shared property of every man on the street.

cryptic__egg #sexist incels.co

[Serious] Why do females feel the need to show themselves in public?

In Islamic cultures foids are quite rightly expected to cover their faces in public. What foids fail to understand is that being visible is inherently sexually provocative; your body is designed to attract the opposite sex, and simply allowing men to see it is inviting them to try to have sex with you. In the case of rape foids try to argue that it is never the victims fault, but in most cases the fact that she was wearing revealing clothes is what caused the attack. By revealing her body and face, she was indirectly inviting men around her to attempt to take her. It's ridiculous that foids in the modern age try to deny that any of this is true. We know that humans will be sexually drawn to other humans of the opposite sex, so how can anyone claim that knowingly displaying yourself in public is not a sexual act?

The world would be better if foids just covered themselves. Not only would they likely be protected from the sexual advances of men that they would be teasing by showing themselves, but they make the act of showing themselves more significant for the men they do love. Nobody wants to date a foid knowing that she is on display to everyone throughout the day. Your partner is your property, not the shared property of every man on the street.

Terry Crews #sexist newshub.co.nz

Terry Crews has been widely criticised for saying the children of same-sex or single parents will grow up "severely malnourished".

The Brooklyn Nine-Nine star has become a celebrated figure for advocating for women and for his 2017 testimony about allegedly being assaulted by another man.

But public opinion might be shifting against Crews after he made a series of tweets about parenting.

It began on February 25, with him complaining about a New York Times article that accused President Barack Obama of "scolding" young black men.

Crews said he was bothered that a female journalist had written an opinion piece "about how boys should be taught to grow into successful young men".

"How would she know?" he asked.

terry crews
@terrycrews · Feb 24, 2019
If a successful black man can’t advise the black male youth of the next generation, who will?

THE STREET. That’s who.

Why Does Obama Scold Black Boys? https://nyti.ms/2Np3sT5

terry crews
@terrycrews

Another thing that bothers me is that this OP-ED was written by a WOMAN about how how boys should be taught to grow into successful young men.

How would she know?

MEN NEED TO HOLD OTHER MEN ACCOUNTABLE.

3,079 4:22 PM - Feb 24, 2019

That tweet provoked accusations of misogyny, which Crews denied - and then it all got much worse.

"I've reiterated many times that same sex couples and single parents can successfully raise a child," he wrote on Saturday (local time).

"But I believe paternal AND maternal love are like vitamins and minerals to humanity. No matter where you get that paternal and maternal love. MY purpose is to give paternal love."

Another Twitter user replied: "Love is not gendered. A child will not starve with only one gender loving them."

"But they will be severely malnourished," was Crews' response.

Femitheist Divine #sexist outerplaces.com

In a recently published VICE interview, she explains femitheism as follows: "I believe that conventional equality, with a 50/50 female-to-male ratio, is an inferior system. Essentially my ideas lead to men being made a special class – a far more valued class – having choice of a myriad of women due to the difference in sex ratio. That is my intention. Men would be made more valuable, and their quality of life would be dramatically improved. They would have a subsidised existence if you will, akin to going on an all-expenses paid vacation that lasts from birth to death."

To be fair, she doesn't believe that men should be slaughtered, but that they should be gradually phased out of the population through genetic engineering and possibly selective abortions. And she claims that these steps would not be mandated, "at first," but merely encouraged. Children would very much designed, and raised communally by the state. "Perfect girls will be conceived, developed, and engineered in state-owned breeding centers. They will be bound together in a communal venue under the instruction and control of female savants."

The few men that are left would be kept on their own reservations and used only for breeding, possibly some light labor. When asked if she acknowledged that some men have ambitions beyond "luxury breeding pens," she answered: "Some would argue it would be a dystopian world because it wouldn't be free in the present conventional sense. However that is misguided. It will be utopian because it will be a world almost without conflict where people cooperate and are treated properly within a well-engineered and long-forged system. If everything is great for almost everyone the point is null."

BabyFuck McGirlsex #sexist #racist incels.co

[Based] Based Africa shows us how to deal with Foids

image(Man, standing on a huge rock, stomps his foot on the head of a woman leaning against the rock.)

Foids are supposed to be lower than men - they should be under the feet of men. That is the natural state of humanity. If foids never stopped being subservient to men then inceldom would not be an issue in 2020 and we would be having world peace

micropenis29 #sexist incels.co

[Blackpill] Teen Pregnancy Should Be Seen As Normal

In a healthy society, most foids ages 12-15 would be marrying and having babies. They would then continue having babies until they are 25 or so, and they would of course be full-time mothers and housekeepers.

Most men would be married with anywhere from 5 to 15 kids.

These would be the social norms, and anyone who broke them would be ostracized and rejected by mainstream society. The people most likely to fall into this category would be GigaChads, Chads, and the lowest-IQ foids since Chads prefer not to marry any foid, and the lowest-IQ foids are too dumb to realize that they need men to provide for them while they focus on child-rearing.

Note that this is the exact group that we want to stop being taken care of by society and to thus stop producing children, since this is the dumbest set of people.

Guillaume Durocher #sexist #transphobia #racist #homophobia europereloaded.com

Any rational and fact-based discussion about gender equality and the right roles for the sexes is impossible in our society.

It is impossible because we cannot even bring ourselves to recognize the reality of biological sex – hence the increasingly-widespread insanity of allowing male-to-female transsexuals participate in, and thereby dominate, women’s sports. In the face of such insanity, all our ancestral wisdom and modern science – not to mention my own scribblings – are quite useless: there’s no helping people who are too dishonest or cowardly to see what is in front of their own nose.

However, for the sake of our young white boys – who are already being scapegoated for the inevitable failures to achieve equality and who need to take up their place in society as proud and confident men – I will provide a brief account of sex differences and what gender relations might look like in a healthy society.

Biological sex differences beyond the mere reproductive apparatus, known as sexual dimorphism, is the norm in much the Animal Kingdom. This reflects the differing evolutionary strategies of males and females. Almost every difference imaginable is possible, according to that particular species’ differing evolutionary strategies for males and females. Typically, while females carry and (where applicable) nurture offspring by default, males are more competitive and have to prove themselves in some way to get the female’s approval; whether this means rams battering their horns against one another or birds preparing elegant nests or showing off their spectacular plumage. (On which see David Attenborough’s innumerable nature documentaries, which typically boil down to animals struggling to get food, not get eaten, and find a mate.)

Sexual dimorphism can be non-existent or extreme. In the case of the deep sea angler fish, the small male bites in the female and gradually fuses with her, until all that remains is a pair of gonads attached to the female’s body. So far, there is no angler fish “masculinist movement” arguing for the interchangeability and equal rights of male and female angler fish.

The differences between men and women are certainly not as severe as among male and female angler fish, but they are not negligible. To be brief: men are competitive and achieve their highest reproductive potential through conquest, while women are consensual and achieve their highest reproductive potential through nurturing. A successful man might have dozens or even hundreds of children, a biological impossibility even for the most successful woman. Men’s evolutionary strategy is high-risk, high-reward. Women’s is low-risk, low-reward.

A successful man would be engaged in collective struggles with other men to seize resources, to build, to discover, while a successful woman would secure resources from her man! And Nature has equipped women with all the psychological traits and emotional skills to do so. A man is attracted to a healthy, beautiful woman. A woman is attracted to a socially successful, prestigious man with money, one who is at once a provider and a bad-boy (she is very torn on this), so as to provide for her and protect her. Hence, the media have breathlessly reported that the economic decline of men is a tragedy . . . for women’s marriage prospects!

In the prehistoric tribe, a successful man would have spent much time physically exerting himself, hunting animals or warring against other men, as part of a coalition of men. Women would have spent much of their adult life incapacitated in the home, pregnant or caring for small children. The psychological traits appropriate for these two modes of life are of course vastly different.

If you ever engage in any kind of physically difficult group endeavor – say you move to a different home with all your furniture – you will typically find that men and women revert to their traditional roles. The men will be literally doing the heavy lifting and building the furniture, while the women will be cleaning, cooking, and providing moral support (the value of which should not be underestimated).

Women also seem to be natural enforcers of social values. While men have historically controlled the priesthoods and the media, it is women who nag their menfolk to live up to the society’s established social norms and be respectable. (No doubt part of the reason why homosexuals have become so prominent in the far-Right since the latter has become heretical.) It is said that Spartan women would murder their own sons if these ever fled battle, and that it was Byzantine women who murdered the soldiers who had been ordered to destroy Christian icons. Across Europe today you will find that old women are virtually the only ones left going to the villages churches.

As we have become comfortable, so our societies and culture have become feminized and infantilized. Today, it seems that women project their mothering instincts upon all the approved “victim groups” of the world: homosexuals, migrants, and minorities all are their symbolic substitute children. Any measures which do not treat these groups as “equals” with heterosexual child-rearing European families – even if salutary for the common good – are then considered mere vicious “bullying.” In the United States, White Democratic women have driven most of the shift towards the demand there be equal racial outcomes, even if discrimination is required.

In my view, following Aristotle and Darwin, human ethics must be founded upon human nature. Humans are social and potentially rational beings, who exist through the creation of successive generations, passing on hereditary characteristics. To the extent that men and women differ biologically, this may imply that, ethically, there should be different social roles for them, in order to foster maximal individual and collective human flourishing.

The most obvious of these is military service. Men being physically much more powerful than women, societies have always discriminated against men by requiring them to serve in the military, while women stayed safe at home. (Hollywood has not yet attempted to show how strong, independent black women were central to the success of the D-Day landings, but there is still time.) The social expectation that women stay at home to take care of children is exactly analogous to this. An optimally-organized species will have sexually specialized roles, to some extent, for the benefit of the species.

The Spartans, the Aztecs, and Mussolini were all in agreement: childbirth – probably the most intense experience a typical postmodern may live today – is to women what war is to men. And so, it probably is not a coincidence that male authority has wholly collapsed at the same as peace has triumphed in our lands.

Even a couple of generations ago, every day our grandfathers had to show daily heroism: working in the fields, in mines, on fishing boats, or in the military, come rain or snow. By this effort, they secured their families’ livelihood and their own paternal authority, not to mention their own native toughness.

Canino1997 #sexist

It should be legal for incels to rape females if they use protection and the female is unconscious

Inceldom is a deprivation of a basic human need. If an incel does rape an unconscious female with protection, the female wouldn’t even know that she was raped. Even if she found out it wouldn’t be that bad. No violence or anything would be used against the female because she would be unconscious. She wouldn’t even remember it. Rape to a female would do way less harm than inceldom does to a man. Overall suffering would be reduced. If a man is an incel long enough to rape a female, then he is the victim, not the villain. No starving man should have to go to prison for stealing food, and no sexually starved man should have to go to prison for raping a female. Without food, the body of a man dies. Without sex, the soul and mind of a man will die. If a man is an incel long enough he will end up going insane sooner or later. This way the females would not remember or know that they were raped. Men would be able to keep their sanity and the suffering of us incels would be ended. In my opinion, it should be legal for incels to rape unconscious females if they use protection to create a better world with no suffering.

FOR A BETTER INCEL NATION, WE STAND UNITED!!!!!

Canino1997 #sexist

It should be legal for incels to rape females if they use protection and the female is unconscious

Inceldom is a deprivation of a basic human need. If an incel does rape an unconscious female with protection, the female wouldn’t even know that she was raped. Even if she found out it wouldn’t be that bad. No violence or anything would be used against the female because she would be unconscious. She wouldn’t even remember it. Rape to a female would do way less harm than inceldom does to a man. Overall suffering would be reduced. If a man is an incel long enough to rape a female, then he is the victim, not the villain. No starving man should have to go to prison for stealing food, and no sexually starved man should have to go to prison for raping a female. Without food, the body of a man dies. Without sex, the soul and mind of a man will die. If a man is an incel long enough he will end up going insane sooner or later. This way the females would not remember or know that they were raped. Men would be able to keep their sanity and the suffering of us incels would be ended. In my opinion, it should be legal for incels to rape unconscious females if they use protection to create a better world with no suffering.

Kristen Michaelis #conspiracy foodrenegade.com

I never considered the water I was bathing in a health hazard.

For some reason, my brain refused to put two and two together and get four. Only yesterday, when I was talking with Kathy (co-owner of Radiant Life with her husband Norm) did it all click into place.

1. Our skin absorbs many toxins, including chlorine.
2. When we shower, our body absorbs more chlorine through the skin than it does when ingesting it.
3. Chlorine kills beneficial bacteria in your gut.
4. When we shower in chlorinated water, we are killing off the beneficial bacteria in our gut!

Before talking with her, I commonly asked others “If I wouldn’t eat it, why would I put it on my skin?” Now, I’ve added another question to the list, “If I wouldn’t drink it, why would I bathe in it?”

You see, Kathy shared an anecdote that I had to try out for myself. She said, “Listen, if you don’t believe that your skin not only absorbs the things you come in contact with but that these can also enter your digestive system, just try this little experiment. Place a mashed garlic clove in your shoe and see how long it takes for you to taste it.”

It took less than ten minutes.

Yep. That’s definitely garlic I’m tasting.

Mike Shoesmith #fundie ppsimmons.blogspot.co.uk

Should Evolutionists Stay Away From Doctors and Medicine? By Their Logic: YES!

I think I shall never forget a YouTube video I watched about ten years ago in which a young man in his twenties discussed a painful ear infection he was battling. To my amazement he went on to lament the decision he made to take antibiotics; a decision made for him by the pain no doubt.

"I believe in evolution and by taking the medicine I am hindering the evolutionary process," he said to the camera.

Upon further investigation I discovered his channel was dedicated to promoting modern atheism and deep time fish-to-men evolution. "Finally," I thought, "an honest atheist."

Any internal infection can kill you. A dental abscess has toxins that can poison your system. Ear infections are a particularly nasty infliction. Yet the evolutionist will ignore the demands of their theory and implement the aggressive use of force against the attempts of nature to kill us at nearly every turn.

And yet I find it equally disturbing whenever we encounter the evolutionist argument against biblical creationism in the form of their favorite red herring: "If you don't believe in evolution then don't take antibiotics or vaccines because, after all, bacteria and viruses evolve (adapt to our attempts to kill them) and medical science must always stay ahead of those evolutionary mutations in order to produce effective vaccines and antibiotics."

Aha!

Therein lies the single greatest piece of evidence the deep time community has that fish became men, that is, that viruses become viruses and bacteria become bacteria. Therefore we Christians mustn't ever use antibiotics or vaccines because we refuse to believe that fish became men based solely on the fact that bacteria become bacteria and viruses become viruses.

[...]

The Bible offers the greatest reason for the need to use antibiotics and vaccines, etc. Because of the fall of humanity the earth is against us.

Genesis 3:17 ¶And unto Adam he said, Because thou hast hearkened unto the voice of thy wife, and hast eaten of the tree, of which I commanded thee, saying, Thou shalt not eat of it: cursed is the ground for thy sake; in sorrow shalt thou eat of it all the days of thy life;
18 Thorns also and thistles shall it bring forth to thee; and thou shalt eat the herb of the field;
19 In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it wast thou taken: for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return
Humanity was thrust into the position of requiring the aggressive use of force to keep sickness away because of this event which happened as the result of man's decision to disobey God. That is the creationist view of the world which lines up perfectly with the evidence and need for such aggressive items as antibiotics (which were accidentally discovered) and vaccines (developed by scientists with God-given intellect).

I am not sure what happened to the atheist in the video I mentioned at first. I hope he recovered from his painful infection and I hope he rejected the Darwinian demand that the bacteria kill him and take over the earth. Above all I hope the evolutionists embrace the knowledge of the truth that just because bacteria change into bacteria and viruses change into viruses that does not mean the evolutionist was once a fish.

Michael Pearl #fundie nogreaterjoy.org

It takes time and thoughtfulness for the child to come to repentance. I have told a child I was going to give him 10 licks. I count out loud as I go. After about three licks, leaving him in his position, I would stop and remind him what this is all about. I would continue slowly, still counting, stop again and tell him that I know it hurts and I wish I didn’t have to do it but that it is for his own good. Then I would continue slowly. Pretending to forget the count, I would again stop at about eight and ask him the number. Have him subtract eight from ten, (a little homeschooling) and continue with the final two licks. Then I would have him stand in front of me and ask him why he got the spanking. If his answer showed that he was rebellious and defiant, he would get several more licks. Again he would be questioned as to his offense. If he showed total submission, we put it all behind us, but if he were still rebellious, we would continue until he gave over his will. Only about three of our five children ever resisted after a spanking and refused to cooperate. Each of the three required only one experience of continued spankings until they surrendered. None of the three ever tried it a second time. In all cases, it was between the ages of two and four that they tried their moment of defiance.

David J. Stewart #fundie jesusisprecious.org

If I had a one month “Christian leaders training camp,” there'd be barbwire and fox holes for effect and dirt fields. I'd make it look like a World War I encampment. I'd use the theme... “WE'RE AT WAR WITH THE DEVIL, THE WORLD AND THE FLESH!!!” I'd make the “leaders” crawl on their hands and knees through mud to humiliate them. I'd rip their faces off with the hardest preaching they'd ever heard!!! It would be a spiritual boot camp! We'd pray all night long once a week, until they couldn't help but fall asleep. And I'd wake them up! They be required to memorize a chapter a week of the King James Bible. For the entire month we'd only drink water, eat healthy foods, and there wouldn't be any televisions!!! There would only be men, no women! No offense ladies.

There'd be preaching three times a day! There'd be a revival meeting twice a week! If every man in that place hadn't broke down in uncontrollable tears for His dear Savior and the sinful condition of America and our churches after one month, I'd feel like a failure. Quite frankly, I doubt if any affluent Christian leaders would even attend such a life-changing event. Secondly, if they did I don't think they would make it past the first few days. Hence, our pathetic weak religious leaders today, who cannot even discern which Bible is God's Word. Today's pastors need to get hold of God!!!

Mainländer #sexist #vogon incels.wiki

(Line breaks added by submitter; link includes a video of him performing the “song”)

Going outside sucks so much
I get to see
So many cute white young girls whom
I won't ever even kiss
Going outside sucks so much I saw a boy
Playing Pokémon with his dad
Something I have never enjoyed
Going outside sucks
I wish that I could be
Till the day I die
A full blown NEET hiki
Why aren't foids forced to pay incels
To be NEETs just like men do with the kids
Foids have outside of the wedlock
With Chads and thugs, scoundrels and bandits
I wish I was Jeremy Meeks
And got paid well only to exist
Even after his violent crimes
Looks are indeed everything in life
I go outside and see the
People working on
The streets under the hot sun all are
Men foids never fawn upon
I go outside and I see the Normies with gfs
All of them are fat, tattooed roasties
Either that or ancient hags
Going outside sucks
I wish that I could be
Till the day I die
A full blown NEET hiki
Why aren't foids forced to pay incels
To be NEETs just like men do with the kids
Foids have outside of the wedlock
With Chads and thugs, scoundrels and bandits
I wish I was Jeremy Meeks
And got paid well only to exist
Even after his violent crimes
Looks are indeed everything in life

jewamongyou #racist jewamongyou.wordpress.com

It appears that all 19 of the firefighters, who died recently in an Arizona blaze, were white men. Given the aggressive push to get more women and non-whites into fire departments, we might have expected somebody to complain that there should be more faces of color among the dead. Yet, to the best of my knowledge, nobody is so complaining.

Had there been a recruitment billboard for Arizona firefighters featuring those who died on that fateful June day, we would never hear the end of how “racist” and “bigoted” that billboard is. There would be demands for the resignation of whoever designed or authorized it. The billboard would be held up as evidence of how backward and narrow minded Arizona is. We would be reminded that this is the state that tried to enforce our border with Mexico and make life difficult for those who enter illegally.

But this is not a recruitment billboard. It’s an image of 19 white men who tragically lost their lives. A google search for “dead firefighters” and “white” yields results that mention the “White House” and the “white van” that took away the bodies. Nobody seems to pay attention, or care, that all the victims were white. Diversity is the national religion of America, but its followers show apathy when there is no diversity among the dead. It wouldn’t surprise me if certain Afro-centric, and Latino, groups are privately rejoicing. For them, the white man is a demon, and no amount of heroism can erase the sin of his white skin.

Mother nature was to blame for those 19 deaths, but the silence surrounding the race of the victims shows a certain measure of acquiescence. Had they been 19 black men, they would have been doubly mourned: Once for having died as young heroes, and again for having died as black men. Blacks would have mourned the loss of their young black men, and whites would have joined in.

Incidentally, when people die in a conflagration, it’s called a “holocaust”.

iblamemyself #sexist #psycho incels.co

Does anyone else avoid any moral responsibility with the excuse of being a man? (or an incelman?)

Like... even before the blackpill I kind of already swallowed and digested the male disposability pill. When faced with a moral dilemma, I always thought to myself man, why should I interfere?
What I'm trying to get at is that foids have some kind of unique power. I call it pussy power. They could contribute so much to any social environment or to any social situation. I am disposable, and I have embraced my disposabilty and freed myself from moral obligations.


Like, if some guy is lonely and depressed, a foid could easily save him by becoming his gf or even his friend, some guys dig that. I feel like I can't help, I'm a fucking man, man! He might even get offended from my attempts to cheer him up!

Or when some group of people, ex-classmates for example, are breaking apart. I think a foid with some communication and flirting skills could convince around 80% of guys and girls to meet up again. I can't do that. Fuck that stuck-in-the-past loser, is what whiggers would say. Foids would get offended. Don't assume popularity and don't make a move on us, you creeeeeep!

Or some girl is lonely. Why the heck should I help out? First of all, she can cuck-friendzone any cuck off of tinder. And, these creatures have in-group preference. There will be another cunt coming along soon to save that lonely bitch! What am I supposed to do?

Or why would I be friends with a teacher? Imagine a 8/10 cute foid would admire her teacher, get a bunch of As and would, in all her public speeches, mention how great her teacher was and how much he helped and inspired her. That teacher's life would be complete. He would take selfies with her and keep in touch with her forever. I can't provide that experience for a teacher. Wtf is that gay ass whigger's obsession with me? I just do my fucking job, you funny looking dick. Get yer degree and fuck off, fag.


The list goes on and on. You can write your own if you want to.

Roosh #fundie rooshv.com

I’ve had a front-row seat in the culture war for over a decade, but I haven’t made any big policy declarations like other movements. Men’s rights activists their “family law reform” platform. The MGTOW group has “legalize prostitution and invent realistic sex bots.” The alt right has “white ethno-state.” The alt lite has “civic nationalism.” When it comes to policy, I’ve been quiet, solely focusing on fostering truth and masculinity. Only now am I ready to make the commitment to a policy platform which nips the essential problem in the bud in a way that other movements do not. We must repeal women’s suffrage, starting with the 19th Amendment in the United States. Once this is accomplished, no other planned or conscious action must be taken to solve nearly all our societal ills.

...

Today’s problems are all branches of a radical leftist root that has been normalized through feminism, social justice, and socialism. Allowing women to vote has made it effortless to elect leftist politicians who hate the family unit, men, and healthy market competition, while simultaneously weakening society by pushing women into work and giving them generous welfare in the form of handouts to single moms and the able-bodied along with make-work jobs for females in bloated government bureaucracies.

Thanks to leftism, we have seen the rise of a techno-matriarchy with an agenda of male disempowerment and persecution that transfers resources and soft power from men to women while solidifying hard power among elite globalists who control it all to uphold their own high-level aims. Individual globalists work together as an oligarchy to enact a divide-and-conquer strategy among races and sexes to fund leftist causes, politicians, and NGOs. The group with the most money to influence “democratic” politics and public opinion implants their useful idiots and political puppets to maintain control.

These puppets, whether on the “right” or “left,” have a true center on the left end of the spectrum for the sheer reason that votes from women must be gained. The manosphere cannon has shown that women have special mental faculties that operate almost exclusively on emotion, submission, and social conflict more than logic, dominance, and merit. Western countries have transformed into a national representation of the female psyche.

...

To appease female voters and their destructive nature of promiscuity and drama, a symptom of which is collectively propelling a book about a woman being brutally dominated by a man (50 Shades Of Grey) to one of the best selling books of all time, society has veered so far to the left that it is crumbling at its base through declining birth rates and collapse of the family unit. Because we have given women suffrage, it has become necessary to gain their votes by promising whatever they want in the moment, including the removal of all gates to the sexual market so they can engage in the great game of “alpha male hunting,” which has led to such unbridled chaos and sterility that we have to import third-world people as these empowered female voters abort nearly 60 million American babies. The demographic crisis the West faces today is primarily due to allowing women to do as they please instead of imposing healthy standards on their behavior and choices. The direct cause of this horror movie is giving women the vote.

I haven’t even touched the surface of the problems we have today that stem from having to appeal to the female vote: lowering of academic standards in universities to allow them to “excel,” promotion of degeneracy in media, invention of apps and technology to allow frictionless casual sex with bad boys, promotion of sex change operations among children, re-defining fat women as “beautiful at any size,” legalization of gay marriage, use of murder (abortion) as birth control, maligning normal masculinity as “toxic masculinity,” and elevation of damaging myths such as “rape culture” and the “wage gap” to foment gender fear and confusion. The culture has degraded because women have been at the forefront of degrading it. Their true nature, once unimpaired by societal limits, embarks on an tragic mission of destruction to recreate reality in a way to make them appear more attractive to high status men, no matter the consequence.

The problems I mentioned above would take thousands of local and Federal laws to address individually, and it would meet intense opposition from globalists who would fund the sort of antifascist protests and Deep State interference that we have seen thwarting Donald Trump. And even if those thousands of laws are passed, there is no guarantee that a renewed leftward push, thanks to ongoing demographic changes, wouldn’t roll them back. Is there a way to solve the problems while being assured that they couldn’t be repealed over the course of several generations? I’ve thought about this dilemma for years, after scratching the surface with previous thought experiments, and can only come to one conclusion: the problems in society can only be solved, and remain solved beyond one generation, by repealing women’s suffrage.

...

Take away the power of women to vote, and the degradation stops. The paltry population of male feminists, who are likely suffering from low testosterone due to environmental plastics, would offer no barrier in stopping the return to patriarchal normalcy. Women, helpless at enacting political change, would just whine and nag endlessly, and when they tire themselves out, they’d complete their protest by buying dildos or cats. Consider that no Democratic candidate for President since Jimmy Carter would have likely won if women were not allowed to vote. Upon repeal of women’s suffrage, a new party to the right of Republicans would be created as conservative men seek true conservatism and tradition.

Remove a woman’s right to vote and within just one national election, every single leftist party would be crushed. Within two elections, politicians would speak directly to men and their innate interest for patriarchy, economic success, stable families, and an equitable distribution of females among society. More than half of the candidates running for office would already be more conservative than Donald Trump, who is still liberal on social issues like equality and gay marriage.

Within three elections, the entirely of the liberal platform of the past 50 years would be rolled back, and the only living audience a woman can gain for her political opinions is from her feline friends. Within four elections, the global elite would be forced to retrench while sitting on billions of capital with no direct path of influence except sponsoring color revolutions and coups that can be defeated in the name of patriotic national defense. By then, the power of NGOs, media outlets, and day care universities will have declined. Within five elections, cultural standards would have tamed the sexual marketplace, and birth rates would rise once more as both women and men see the incentive in spending their free time building families instead of endlessly trying to secure a sex partner for the fleeting moment.

Repealing women’s suffrage would also diminish other dissident movements whose solutions can only bring temporary success as long as women have the right to vote. Men will automatically push laws that account for men’s rights. They will automatically regulate the sexual marketplace to make it more fair, diminishing MGTOW. They will automatically regulate immigration and replace it with a policy of natalism, diminishing the alt right. And they will automatically have high standards for citizenship, diminishing the alt lite.

Even the concept of masculinity will be built into the crust of society where only men have a political voice and not women. My game guides would no longer be needed, allowing me to buy land and operate a real farm instead of a content farm where most of my life has been spent pushing back the harmful effects that were unleashed after allowing women to vote. There will be no need for counter-cultural movements of men when those in charge of national politics only need to cater to male votes. If women’s suffrage is repealed, the most reviled dissident today would even be able to easily attain political office.

...

It should be clear to you that women will always use their votes to destroy themselves and their nations, to invite invaders with open legs, to persecute their own men, and to ravage their economies with socialism. Because they don’t operate on logic like men do, you will always have this destructive element within the political ranks of your nation as long as women have the right to vote. Giving them this right was a terrible mistake. I can now claim to have one political dream, and that is to repeal women’s suffrage. I will vote only for politicians who put me closer to realizing this necessary reality. Within my lifetime, I’m certain that at least one country, in an attempt to save itself, will elevate a barbarous and ferocious strongman to fulfill this task, and he will have my full support, because repealing women’s suffrage is the only issue of our day that can single-handedly solve all the others.

Pastor Tom Estes #fundie hardtruth.squarespace.com

I'm going to go out on a limb and say that 99% of gays are ideologically opposed to the military. And not only do they believe the military to be evil, wouldn't you also say the military doesn't fit into the carefully crafted stereotypes that GAYS have made up about themselves?

1. They tend to be extremely fashion conscious. (Don't deny it, you know it's true.) So how many gays do you know that would want to wear dark green in the spring, or wear their desert whites in the winter?
2. They tend to be lovers of fine cuisine. With that in mind, how excited would most gays be when they open their army ration kit and find out that stale crackers is what they will be eating, and that it will be washed down with a dirty canteen full of rain water?
3. They are more emotionally connected than most. Do you think they will like their Drill Sergeant screaming in their face while being forced to scrub a bathroom floor with a toothbrush?
Folks, the vast majority of gays have no desire to join the military in the first place, which is why this issue will never go away. If President Obama actually ended the "don't ask, don't tell" policy, then gays would move on to their next issue, but if this issue continues to exist, it serves as a distraction from the issue gays really care about; gay marriage.

But let me tell you another reason that Obama will NEVER give gays this issue; because the straight people in the military would have a fit. And would you blame them? Think about it for just a second. How many of you ladies out there would want to change clothes and shower in front of strange men? How many of you men would want to have to strip down in front of women who aren't your wife? Perverts aside, no one would. Which is why no man would want to shower in the same room with men who were openly gay, and the same would go for women. Simply put, it would be a HUGE distraction, and I'm guessing that people who are about to put their lives at risk need as few distractions as possible.

Here's the HardTruth.

Obama has zero intention of giving gays what they want because he knows the public doesn't want him to. Don't get me wrong, I believe if Obama had his way he would give gays more than want they want. He would probably make it illegal to criticize them if he could, but I can thankfully say, he can't. As he as shown time and again, he can't do anything, which is great for the country, but bad for those who see him as their savior, and that's the HardTruth.

Sobeit #fundie bibleforums.org

Evolution says everything happened by chance. The forming of the earth, the setting distance from the sun, water to give life, seasons to renew, and emotions evolved out of instinct. When did man go from animal to man? A missing link? A theory? You can't find a bone like ours older than 14,000 to 16,000 thousand years ago. Wasn't that around the time of Adam and Eve? Did the food supply evolve alond with each species, or was all the food alreadt here. How would evolution know that? I mean, what we and others eat.

Did we fly they begin to walk again? Did a baby come first or a grown adult? Who would feed it and what would it eat? Would it mate with another like itself, or go backwards mating with what it evolved from? Wouldn't it then be in an endless cycle of evolution and we would still be evolving also? At what point would we stop evolving? Would evolution predetermine when we became perfect in our reproductions of one another?

patsystone #fundie wnd.com

"Right now, in 2013, in many states a person can be fired simply for being lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender," Obama wrote in a blog..."

Very unfortunate those perverts, degenerates and depraved lust-crazed freaks can't be fired. It would keep them in the closet where they belong. That way they can't spread the poison that homosexuality/lesbian etc is a 'lifestyle' choice. Our children wouldn't be targeted, and it would be one less piece of 'werk' that our children wouldn't be brainwashed into believing.

"It's offensive. It's wrong. And it needs to stop, because in the United States of America, who you are and who you love should never be a fireable offense," the president added."

It's not 'love', it's lust Dingleberry. And although you might find the morsel of pure truth 'offensive', your homosexuality is offensive. Everything that you ARE is offensive to anyone with at least two firing synapses. Homosexuality, lesbian and other depravities are deeply offensive to God!

Out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks. (Luke 6:45, Matt 12:34)

Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter! (Isaiah 5:20)

StAliaHarkonnen #fundie reddit.com

Do women understand that no one likes their personality and that attention and compliments they get about anything is just because of their cunts?

Of course they do. On some level they know they are vapid, they just get to suppress it and rationalize they aren't. As long as men keep on validating them the illusion persists.

That's why they are so upset about men seeing them as objects. I mean, it wouldn't even occur to any man to think his whole humanity is in question because some girl wants his dick, to think like that you need to be seriously doubting it yourself.

Women live on whiteknighs and beta orbiters, Chads reap the rewards. Cause they can excuse being used for their cunt in their fwb relationship as long as so many guys just love her sense of humor and intelligence.

Lol, no one does. You all know it. If you were male no one would give you time of day. You'd never have anything relevant to say. You'd never make anyone laugh. No one would ever call you interesting or stand talking to you for more than few seconds. You'd have no friends. Your posts would get no likes. Other men would hate you, including all your beta orbiters who are really just friends and only caring and loving because of what a great person you are - no, they'd kick you out of the group for being annoying. No one would ever ask you questions or find your anecdotes fascinating. No one would find your quirks cute.

If all of you turned into men you'd be a group below incels cause you wouldn't even be able to stand each other. Even your adoring dad would see you as a disappointment. Suddenly those suicidal tendencies would have much higher success rate. And still no one would give a shit.

Adam Grey #wingnut #sexist faithandheritage.com

Can anyone name a female politician who has actually accomplished anything of worth for traditionalists in the last 50 years?

Asking for a friend.

It’s 2018, the so-called “Year of the Woman,” and while the Left is pushing their vagina privilege with reckless abandon, the faux Right is trying to keep pace by dumping feminists onto their voter base with impunity.

The question any half-witted conservative/traditionalist should ask himself before pulling a lever this November is, are these women part of the solution or just more of the problem?

Even if we exclude the non-white “conservative” female pols that the GOP has forced on us, such as Condoleeza Rice and Nimrata Randhawa (aka Nikki Haley), they’ve convinced us over the past half-century to gush over white “conservative” female politicians such as Elizabeth Dole, Sarah Palin, Michele Bachmann, Carly Fiorina, Liz Cheney, and Pam Bondi.

I have previously written about the influx of pretty blonde conservatives into American politics that picked up speed in the early 2000s during the George W. Bush administration and the early years of Fox News. Today, any media outlet that is slightly to the right of center has more than its share of pretty “conservative” faces telling their mostly-male audiences what to believe and how to live.

The Alt Right/Alt Lite has had its own slate of female media celebrities since 2015. Now one of them, Faith Goldy, is running for mayor of Toronto.

This relevant observation by Brandon Martinez poses a good question.

Women like Goldy, Lauren Southern and others are little more than fame-hungry opportunists who saw a growing niche market with the alt-light, alt-right and pro-Trump movements. They’re simply capitalizing on these sentiments in order to make money and get men to gawk at them on YouTube. That’s just what women do, always on the hunt for opportunities to increase their profile and status. And stupid men give it to them. Why do we need bimbo broads like these to become leading voices for nationalism when all they do is sell us half-truths and dumb cuckservative talking points that half-witted male alt-lighters like Cernovich, Yiannopoulos and Watson have been expressing more intelligently?

If we look at female candidates like Goldy and ask, “Will she support those policies I believe in, more than the other candidates?” we might well find ourselves answering in the affirmative. If it’s a simple lesser of two evils choice, sometimes the “conservative” female is less evil.

However, if the question is, “Is this female candidate part of the solution or just more of the problem?” then the answer is simple.

In a sane world there would be no need for these ladies to take up the political battle ax. In a sane world, there would be plenty of men to do the job and those ladies would be willing to let the men do it.

In our world, the presence of these women in leadership positions may be partly due to the absence of men willing to step up and lead. However, I place greater blame on the ideological force of egalitarianism vis-à-vis feminism for keeping those men in their homes and pushing those women out of their homes.

It’s not as if for centuries there were chronic shortages of men to do the work of governance. That is, not until feminism convinced women to shove their way into governance, and shamed men into giving up their positions of governance. That includes more than serving in elected offices. The basic tool of civic governance is the right to vote. By giving women the vote, men abdicated half their power to govern their society. Eve had suddenly become independent of, and equal to, Adam. Goodbye traditional America, hello clown world.

Today men on the Left believe it is morally virtuous to elect women instead of men. Men on the faux Right are just a few years away from adopting that same moral view, just as they adopted the once-radical Leftist notion that electing non-whites instead of whites is the morally virtuous thing to do. See the presidential candidacies of Alan Keyes and Ben Carson for reference.

The solution is not to elect “conservative” women or non-whites. The solution is for white men to lead in every part of our society. And where right-minded white men are lacking, you dear reader, can be the solution. Remember Gideon.

The best politically-active women have been those who championed traditional gender roles and nationalism, such as Phyllis Schlafly and Ann Coulter. But even they have not been the shining lights of our people. They themselves would tell you that white men have fulfilled that role.

So this November, electing the “conservative” white female candidate is not the answer. The answer might take a little longer to see in positions of leadership, but the answer is obvious. And it wears pants.

some incels #sexist reddit.com

Just NPCmax Bro!

image

(anewcenturysrecord)
Daily reminder that all women are sociopaths

(cowardlynormie)

These are the same foids who served the Nazi's refreshments after they slaughtered jewish families.

Someone needs to make a gif of this:

The ending of Black Hawk Down, when the Pakistani troops are serving refreshments to the Americans, except it's foids serving them to the Nazis.

Would require a creative video-editing-cel to pull this off.

It's more horrifying then you think, just look outside and imagine a group of men in black military uniforms herding a buncha jewish familys behind some hedges, gunshots for a few hours then coming out covered in blood, dirt and completely wasted, with a line of blonde and equally jewish looking women waiting serving water, like some sort of high school football tradition.

Asian Foids would serve Hans Landa that dessert he loves eating after he massacres an entire family.

(Chasemo)
This is why the whole "women are attracted to men who get with other women" thing is bullshit. If a foid sees a short, overweight and unattractive neckbeard walking into a club with his arms around two babes, do you think shes going to want him? No, shes going to be repulsed, wonder how much he paid them, etc.

(HipHopCel)
Just man up and pay for Chad's baby you fucking incels. You have your role in society and it's NOT sexual.

Church of Almighty God #racist holyspiritspeaks.org

God has appropriately distributed all these different types of races so that these different races are distributed across different parts of the world. In these different parts of the world, God long since prepared an environment for survival suitable for each different race of human. Within these types of environment for survival, God has prepared for them the soil’s color and components. The components in white people’s bodies and black people’s bodies are not the same, and are also different from the components of people’s bodies of other colors. When God created all beings, He had already prepared such an environment for survival. His purpose in that was so that when that type of people started to multiply, when they started to increase in number, they could be fixed within that scope. Before God created human beings He had already thought it all out—He’d give a certain area to white people to allow them to develop and survive.

So when God was creating the earth He already had a plan, He had intention and purpose in what He was putting into that piece of land, and what would be nurtured on that piece of land. For example, God long ago prepared what mountains, how many plains, how many water sources, what kinds of birds and beasts, what fish, and what plants would be on that land. When preparing an environment for survival for a type of human being, for a race, God considered many aspects of issues: the geographical environment, the components of the soil, the types of birds and beasts, the size of the various types of fish, the components in the fish, different water qualities, as well as all the different types of plants…. God had long ago prepared all of that. That type of environment is a native environment for survival that God created and prepared for white people.

You should be able to see that when God created all beings, He put a lot of thought into it. He did things with a plan. Now you can see that, right? (God’s considerations for various types of people were very thoughtful. For the environment for survival for different types of humans, He prepared the kinds of birds and beasts and the kinds of fish, how many mountains and how many plains there would be. All of it was considered very thoughtfully and precisely.) For example, what food do white people primarily eat? (It’s mainly high protein foods—different types of meat, dairy products, and wheat-based foods.) The foods that white people eat are very different from the foods that Asian people eat. The staple foods that white people eat are primarily meat, eggs, milk, and poultry. Grains such as bread and rice are generally non-staple foods that are put to the side of the plate. Even when eating salad, which is made up of vegetables, they put some roasted beef or chicken in it.

Even if they eat some wheat-based foods, they add cheese, eggs, or meat to it. That is to say, their staple foods aren’t primarily made up of wheat-based foods or rice; they eat quite a lot of meat and cheese. They often drink ice water because they eat really high-calorie foods. When they eat a meal, before the food is served everyone drinks a glass of ice water first, so white people are really robust. These are the sources for their lives, their environments for living prepared for them by God, allowing them to have that kind of lifestyle. That lifestyle is different from the lifestyles of people of other colors. There is no right or wrong in this lifestyle—it is inborn, predestined by God and because of God’s rule and His arrangements. This type of race has a certain lifestyle and certain sources for their livelihood which is because of their race, as well as because of the environment for survival prepared for them by God. You could say that the environment for survival God prepared for white people and the daily food they obtain from that environment is rich and plentiful.

Jared Taylor #racist #wingnut amren.com

We Are Ruled by Fools

And we are a nation of cowards.

The protests and riots over the death of George Floyd have had remarkable results. One has been rituals of subservience by whites. In New York City, hundreds of white people knelt and repeated degrading slogans shouted at them by a black man. [00:9 – 00:24] They also chanted that the solution was not voting but revolution.

The white police chief of Webster, Massachusetts, went face-down on the pavement during a Black Lives Matter protest. One black shouted, “It’s not enough, but it’s a start.”

In Cary, North Carolina, white police officers washed the feet of a black pastor and his wife.

Nancy Pelosi, Charles Schumer, and other Democrats knelt and observed nine minutes of silence to “honor George Floyd.”.

In Bethesda, whites repeated what sounded like a new profession of faith. [0:00 – 0:22] Black protest and the fight against that will o’ the wisp known as “systemic racism” has become like a religion.

Maybe that’s why no one dares punish rioters. In Washington, prosecutors dropped charges against virtually every person the police brought in on a felony rioting charge. Fort Worth Police also dropped rioting charges against protesters. The Manhattan DA decided not to prosecute protesters for low-level offences, including unlawful assembly and disorderly conduct. That’s just as well for Chiara de Blasio, the daughter of the Mayor Bill de Blasio. She was facing those very charges.

It may be that all white men are as bad as Frank Rizzo. The theory today is that we are all racists and that even the best intentioned whites can’t help propping up white supremacy. That thinking logically leads to signs like this one, which says, “Haiti did it in 1804. This is just Round 2. What happened in 1804? Blacks slaughtered all the whites on the island.

Here’s another Black Lives Matter sign: “We are not like our ancestors. We will Fuck you up.” This lady seems to have a broader program in mind than merely justice for George Floyd.

One expert estimates that the damage, looting, and business losses for Target during the protests were $50 to $100 million. What’s the solution? Target has pledged $10 million to “help heal,” as the company put it, and promised 10,000 hours of free consulting to people of color who own small businesses. Only to people of color. Don’t even ask if you’re white.

The Financial Times noted that “US companies flood civil rights groups with donations.” The paper has a table of corporate pledges that total more than $485 million. The list isn’t complete. Apple and YouTube are each going to spend $100 million to fight racism. The beauty company Glossier pledged $1 million that the Financial Times didn’t know about, and I’m sure there’s a lot more. The eventual total could be – what? — 1 billion? 2 billion? American companies are laying off millions and millions of people. And they are giving millions and millions of dollars to the folks who rioted, looted, and burned their businesses.

It seems that every organization in the country is preening itself on racial sensitivity. The principal of my daughter’s high school sent all us parents a message about what he called, “the heinous acts of racism and hate that have occurred in our country.” The Yale Club of Washington DC wrote to tell me, “We can only begin to understand the daily pain of our black peers. Institutional racism, inequity, and injustice are unacceptable.” A friend got a message that said, “the Minnesota Orchestra will reduce our reliance on and reproduction of white privilege and will disrupt our own role in systemic racism.” What have these musicians, in their masks, standing eight feet apart, ever done that was remotely racist?

The rules change when you protest against the public health crisis of racism. Perhaps you saw that over 1,000 health professionals had written a public letter about the demonstrations, saying, “We do not condemn these gatherings as risky for COVID-19 transmission. We support them as vital to the national public health.” But they said any other demonstrations are bad, especially if you are out of work and protesting a lockdown order. We’re supposed to stay indoors even if it kills the economy, but go ahead and catch Covid or give to someone else if it’s in the name of George Floyd.

White people everywhere were caught up in this festival of guilt and capitulation. Here is Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau — in the middle wearing just the right mask – for a Black Lives Matter rally. Along with aides, he knelt in tribute to George Floyd.

These lads in Brussels tore a traffic signal off a pole and threw it at the police. [0:00 to 0:11] With the Brussels police occupied, looting went on in high spirits. [0:22 – 0:35] The London police ran away from demonstrators.” [00:10 – 00:41] A statue of Belgian King Leopold II had to be vandalized and torn down because . . . well, I’m sure you know why.

The BBC sent this astonishing tweet: “27 police officer injured during largely peaceful anti-racism protests in London.” Looks very peaceful.

Here’s the main lesson from all of this: Violence works. Rioting works. If you burn down enough buildings you get what you want. What if blacks had seen the video of George Floyd’s death and quietly waited for the investigation, indictment, trail, and verdict. That’s what white people did when a black Minneapolis policeman shot and killed an unarmed white women. It’s the civilized thing to do. But if blacks and their hopped up “white allies” had done the civilized thing, there wouldn’t be a billion dollars splashed out for black causes, would there? There wouldn’t be monuments to white men coming down all over the country. There wouldn’t be white people on their knees, washing the feet of black people.

Are our rulers such fools they don’t know that if you give in to a child’s temper tantrum, you get more tantrums? Don’t they understand that if you bow to the mob, you get more mobs. I guess they don’t. Our rulers really are . . . fools.

Edmund_Kemper #wingnut #transphobia #sexist incels.co

(More from this thread bashing FSTDT)

KeithInc

this retard thinks he can handle being called a bigot and therefore he supports trannies using the women's room because it's the right thing to do. i'm sure if this fag lived 10 years ago, he would've thought this tranny bathroom thing is insane. he thinks it isn't difficult being called a bigot. well, i dare him to condemn the tranny bathroom thing on twitter, and he will be the victim of a viral call-out culture tweet and be harassed by tons of leftists on there, while if he defends it, he'll be praised on there and maybe only a few right-wingers will attempt to hassle him. he should try condemning the tranny bathroom thing on a viral video and he could get doxxed and cyberbullied to death. also being called by a nigger lover by a few people isn't as bad because most people won't hate you for respecting black people. many people WILL hate you if you oppose this trans bathroom shit. when you're taught by the norm that you're an evil monster if you oppose certain "rights", you're gonna support these "rights" out of fear. i know for a fact he'd oppose this trans bathroom thing 10 years ago. and he claims to have a wife. jfl i bet he doesn't. he's probably just some dumb 20 year old pretending to be in his 30s

Skida

this fag says "iT's NoNe oF yOuR BuSiNeSs wHaT BaThRoOm tHeY uSe" yes it is. the reason why trannies with cocks using the women's room or trannies with vaginas using the men's room is controversial is NOT because people are "bigots" it's because we seperate mens room and womens room because of difference in genitals NOT difference in gender/chromosomes. a person with a penis and a person with a vagina sharing the same bathroom is bad because of privacy issues, safety issues, etc. an adult with a penis shouldn't use the same bathroom with a 11 year old girl with a vagina all by herself. what's next? make all bathrooms shared by men and women and make all locker rooms, etc shared by men and women? it is our business because if a man walks into the women's room, women will feel uncomfortable. i'm sure many will feel uncomfortable if a trans woman walked in (but many women wouldn't admit that).

Timjer

"we don't care about you incels, sweety" then why do you post about us? and this faggot thinks IT means pennywise jfl.

(later post)
Jfl at this post-wall roastie

"Swede? Is he talking about me?

Well, I’ve said a lot of things here, so I might have commented on him as well. I doubt that I’m “bluepilled” though, and I’m clearly not a fag. I’m more of a fag-hag…

I accept homosexuals and transgender people because they exist, and are not harmful to anyone else. I’d never write like that with every other letter a vowel, I’d get a cramp in my 50-year-old fingers.

As I call myself SWEDE, whatever AMERICANS approve of or not is clearly not my business. Of course, I care, and I can protest, but I can’t vote on it.

I probably said I WANTED to resist Kim Jong-un, but I don’t know if I would dare. I don’t want to end up like Sophie Scholl in the Weiße Rose.

Ancient Greece didn’t just have teen boys fucking adult men, it had long-term relationships between men of the same age in the army, and in other parts of society.

Ordinary men in history have very seldom married “jb” (jailbait, I guess) girls, as ordinary men needed a house-keeper; someone to organize the home and delegate to the servants what to do. A 12-14-year-old girl can’t do that! As second or third wife; yes, perhaps. Royalty, who needed heirs rather than life-partners, sure, but they were often BOTH small children when they were betrothed to each other.

I KNOW teens, I know that the brain is not fully mature until somewhere around 25 to 30. If anything, people grow up faster now, with better nutrition. Children are ALLOWED to stay children longer now, than before 1900, but that doesn’t mean they were ready and able for it then. After all, it took around a million years to reach the first billion people, but it took only two centuries, after that, to get to 7,7 billion people."

This foid claims to be 50 years old LOL. what 50 year old woman posts on a forum making fun of other people? she's probably saying that to appear "mature" and "wise". she's probably 20. and then she says she accepts lgbt people because they deserve respect, when she probably would've thought of them as "freaks" back in the 50s. and then she says it was rare for jb foids to marry in history when that's BS. if you look up marriage in ancient greece, girls DID marry 14/15 to men twice their age. just because homosexuality/pederasty existed back then doesn't mean men marrying jb foids never happened. also, sex between 2 males back then doesn't mean men married each other back in ancient greece. in ancient egypt, girls usually married at age 12-15 and boys married at usually 15-20. in ancient israel, girls typically married at age 12-13. in the early meiji period, women in japan usually married at 16. in 1371, most 16 year old girls were married and many 15 year olds were too. in the early 1900s, the average age for indian girls married was 13 and it was 20 for boys. before the industrial revolution, in regions like india, china and east europe, many teen girls married to older men.

and then swedes says "jB fOiDs CaN't hAnDLe bEiNg wiVeS". teenagers today maybe that's the case but teens back then grew up a lot faster. this teen brain thing is a MYTH. i've read about how the teen brain is NOT the cause of immature/reckless behavior and that the behavior causes the immature brain and that teens actually act immature because we infantilize them and treat them like kids. laws restrict teens' adult rights didn't appear until the 20th/21st centuries. teens used to be much more mature back in the day.

check out these urls about the teen brain myth: https://drrobertepstein.com/pdf/Epstein-THE_MYTH_OF_THE_TEEN_BRAIN-Scientific_American_Mind-4-07.pdf The Danger of Treating Teens Like Children Are the Brains of Reckless Teens More Mature Than Those of Their Prudent Peers?

now anyways, she once said that people in the 50s were more "live and let live" than i think. ok go back to the 50s and date a black person in public. go ahead. see how it ends.

here's the link: 3$QD8PZ6JVM46

Arthas93 #sexist #crackpot incels.co

[Hypocrisy] The women earning/marriage paradox.

Woman only want to marry/have relationships/sex with handsome men who are also higher status and earn more money than them.

That is female hypergamy, and it dictates to them that they must be with the best Chads possible, and ignore all others.
Of course they will seek marriage with inferior beta cucks, when such thing benefits them. To string them along, not give them any sex, and have them pay their bills.

And at the same time fulfill their hypergamy, cucking the beta cuck, by seeking sex with Chads that are handsome, even thought some of those Chads may have less money/lesser social status than them, just because of the Chad's face/body appearance.

Seems like the perfect plan, right? The foid gets everything: She gets a beta cuck to wageslave and provide for her AND a handsome Chad for sex and social media attention/validation/envy from her female "friends". Both biological needs and social needs are fulfilled.

But there is one problem, the only flaw: women themselves.
Women also demand to be paid more, to have higher status jobs, to have female only teams, female only companies, female only director boards, etc. That ends up hurting men, they demand men to earn less, get less status.

The foid demands both: To have relationships with better men and demand for men to be treated worse.
The result of that paradox is what we see today: Endless Degeneracy.
Where foids keep chasing top men, while trying to take those men from the top.

Jesus M #fundie answers.yahoo.com

Why there are still apes, and other animals,,reptiles,fish and other smaller organism. They should have now vanished and all of them became man.

Do you look like a pig, carabao,apes, fish worms,denosauar,horse,cow? impossible thing to happen.

Are you moron to reaalize the truth of your being a man? Why do you eat fish if you came from the fish. It means you are eating your own body. and why do you eat meat of pig, cow since it is your own body.?
foolish and moron thinking of evolution.

The fish,cow ,carabao monkey,apes and other animals will complain to you that why they are still of that same animals when other evolve to be man, it is unfair contention., foolishness theory.
jtm

The Abyss & N-Digger #sexist incels.co

(The Abyss)

[Blackpill] One little change of circumstances

If tomorrow everyone woke up & strength levels were swapped between males & females you would see the following:

Women openly insulting & ridiculing (to extreme levels) ugly, short or bald men.
Foids beating guys up left & right.
Sexual harassment by foids grabbing guys crotch.
Guys they don't like would receive a cock knocker slap to the Johnson followed by a remark like baby dick.
Any men defending themselves would still get jumped by cucks & have the book thrown at them in court.
A new type of prison/torture chambers.
Battle royale (Jap movie) type events.

(N-Digger)

It's a good thing that nature made the eviler sex the weakest. In times past they acted well because their survival depended on men, they had no choice but to please them and they were rewarded in doing so. But now as they become increasingly independent they show their true nature.

Ray Comfort #fundie facebook.com

The reason I believe the Bible is the Word of the Creator is because I have evidence that convinced me of that fact. It didn’t convert me. It amazingly explained what had happened to me after my conversion. It also contains explicit and inexplicable prophecies that pinpoint humanity’s timeline.

The Scriptures warned that at the end of this age (not the end of the world), just before the second coming of Jesus, certain things would be happening:

1. There would be money-hungry Bible teachers, who would slur the Christian faith and deceive many: “There will be false teachers among you . . . and many will follow their destructive ways, because of whom the way of truth will be blasphemed. By covetousness they will exploit you with deceptive words” (2 Peter 2:1–3 NKJV).

2. There would be wars, increased seismic activity, food shortages, and widespread disease: “Nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom. And there will be famines, pestilences, and earthquakes in various places” (Matthew 24:7 NKJV).

3. The moon would become blood red: “The sun shall be turned into darkness, and the moon into blood, before the coming of the great and awesome day of the LORD” (Acts 2:20 NKJV).

4. People would become selfish, materialistic, and blasphemous: “In the last days perilous times will come: for men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers” (2 Timothy 3:1–2).

5. The world would embrace homosexuality as a normal lifestyle: “Likewise as it was also in the days of Lot . . . on the day that Lot went out of Sodom it rained fire and brimstone from heaven and destroyed them all. Even so will it be in the day when the Son of Man is revealed” (Luke 17:28–29). Some believe that Sodom was judged because of their inhospitality. However, the Bible makes it clear that Sodom was given over to homosexuality. The Scriptures say that Lot was “oppressed by the sensual conduct of unprincipled men.” These people were “those who indulge[d] the flesh in its corrupt desires and despise[d] authority” (2 Peter 2:7–10 NASB). Jude 7 warns “Sodom and Gomorrah . . . having given themselves over to sexual immorality and gone after strange flesh, are set forth as an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire” (NKJV).

6. Religious hypocrisy would be prevalent: “For [although] they hold a form of piety (true religion), they deny and reject and are strangers to the power of it [their conduct belies the genuineness of their profession]” (2 Timothy 3:5 AMP).

7. Men would deny that God created the heavens, and that He destroyed the world through Noah’s flood: “There shall come in the last days scoffers . . . For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water: whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished” (2 Peter 3:3, 5, 6).

8. The future would become frightening: “. . . men’s hearts failing them from fear and the expectation of those things which are coming on the earth, for the powers of the heavens will be shaken” (Luke 21:26 NKJV).

9. Skeptics (motivated by the sin of lust) would mock these signs, claiming they have always been around: “Scoffers will come in the last days, walking according to their own lusts, and saying, ‘Where is the promise of His coming? For since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of creation’” (2 Peter 3:3–4 NKJV).

10. The city of Jerusalem is pivotal in Bible prophecy. Scripture says that it would become a major political problem for the nations: “And it shall happen in that day that I will make Jerusalem a very heavy stone for all peoples” (Zechariah 12:3 NKJV). The powerful Arab nations want to annihilate the nation of Israel, so that they can have Jerusalem as their center of worship.

Jesus said, “Jerusalem shall be trodden down of the Gentiles, until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled” (Luke 21:24). Jerusalem was controlled by the Gentiles (non-Jewish nations) until 1967, when the Jews took its possession. For the first time in two thousand years the Jews stepped into Jerusalem. This sign shows us where we are on the prophetic clock. We are living on the very edge of the coming of God’s kingdom—when His will, will be done on earth, as it is in heaven. The tragedy, however, is that despite these evident signs, most will ignore the warning to get right with God and eventually end up in a terrible place called "Hell." Don't let that happen to you.

Roosh V #fundie #sexist #crackpot returnofkings.com

ELLIOT RODGER IS THE FIRST MALE FEMINIST MASS MURDERER


Since originally publishing an article describing how a male-friendly culture encouraging Elliot into self-improvement (game), legal prostitution, and foreign marriage with Southeast Asian women would have prevented his murderous rampage, I did something that most people won’t bother to do: I read his manifesto. Not even halfway through, I began to understand exactly why the media has been pushing the narrative that PUA (game) may have been the cause: Rodger was one of their own.

Here is the PDF of his manifesto (http://abclocal.go.com/three/kabc/kabc/My-Twisted-World.pdf). If you take the time to read it, you will likely come to the same conclusion I have that Elliot Rodger is in fact a feminist. In other words, the killings of six individuals stem in part because of his mainstream feminist beliefs that, after intersecting with his dark traits of narcissism, entitlement, loserdom, and hopelessness, led him to kill. The fantastical mainstream media articles you have come across trying to pin Rodger upon us is nothing more than a defensive measure to distance themselves from a killer that was a card-carrying member of their own progressive club.

1. He put pussy on the pedestal, just like feminists do
Feminist theory speaks a whole lot about equality, but it’s actually an ideology that seeks to absolve all women from their amusing but sometimes dangerous stream of mistakes. Feminism (and progressivism in general—they might as well be interchangeable terms) treat women as flawless snowflakes that must be coddled and spoon-fed happiness and validation. Any act by a woman, even if it results in failure or bodily harm (like an abortion), is an “empowering” statement of independence and strength, while any failure by men is seen upon as proof that they are out-of-touch doofuses, a fact that is readily displayed on television, movies, and advertising.

Rodger’s manifesto exactly matches this feminist belief. He shows little genuine hate towards the object of his affections—women—and their poor choices, instead lashing out against the men who were successful with those women. Feminists do the same, always ready to blame men for their failures in life, even going so far as saying that society would be better without men, who are mocked as mere “sperm donors.” In spite of the bad choices that women make by dating bad boys at the schools he attended, Rodger gave them a pussy pass and continued to believe that they were flawless angels who should be cherished, especially the blonde ones.

Rodger’s hate for those men isn’t much different than that hate displayed to me and my colleagues here at ROK. Just take a look at this supposedly professional woman having an embarrassing emotional meltdown on a news show because she didn’t agree with what I said, resorting to blatant distortion and lies about “rape culture” and other such nonsense that was unrelated to the piece she was critiquing:
https://youtu.be/g3w-5-b4mhM

Elevating women as the superior sex, which is what both feminists and Rodger have done, means that discrimination and outright hatred must be then applied to the “inferior” sex—men. It’s no surprise that the most violent killings performed by Rodger were on his three male roommates with a knife, who surely endured more suffering and pain than the cleaner executions he did on his female victims.

2. He was awash in blue pill knowledge

We have an often-used metaphor called the “red pill,” which stands for the pursuit of truth concerning human nature, no matter how painful those truths can be. The opposite of the red pill is the blue pill, of people who choose to be placated by lies describing reality. Both feminists and Rodger were firm adherents to the blue pill world—of believing in a way of nature that doesn’t actually reflect actual human behavior. For example:

Both Rodger and feminists believe that attraction should be automatic and easy instead of being based on sexual market value or other components that can be changed (such as game).
Both Rodger and feminists believe that men should be blamed for problems of society or personal relationships.
Both Rodger and feminists were deluded into having standards way beyond their level of attractiveness (e.g., fat feminist cows actually think they should be able to date a good man).
Both Rodger and feminists believe that all a man has to do to get a girlfriend is to be “nice” and a provider, a strategy that no longer works in today’s America.
Both Rodger and feminists hated players who did well with women
As final proof that Rodger was as blue pill as you can get, simply reverse all the gender references within his manifesto and pretend it was written by a woman. What you would then have before you is a pity party of a self-absorbed feminist who thinks that men are the cause of all her problems. If he lived a couple more years, I have no doubt that Rodger would even be a proud moderator of the Blue Pill subreddit.

3. He didn’t believe in self-improvement, just like feminists
In spite of all the loneliness and pain that Rodger went through, he still couldn’t be bothered to lift one finger to improve his station. Compare that to what we teach here at ROK, where we strongly advise you to start your game training with at least 100 approaches, with the expectation that you’ll probably have to do thousands during your lifetime. In Rodger’s manifesto, all 140 pages of it, he details only saying “Hi” to one girl and practically running away from fear. In other words, he did one aborted approach with zero follow-up. That’s not game anywhere in the game universe, and if he came to us saying that he has yet to get laid after putting such an half-assed attempt, we’d tell him to do 10 solid approaches the following day and stop whining like an entitled child.

The fact that Rodger was a member of PUAHate, an online community of social retards who despised game and believed only Brad Pitt and millionaires can get laid, further highlights how vehemently anti-game he was. Why wasn’t he open to improving himself? Why wasn’t he ready to expend the labor to make himself more attractive to women? For that answer, we might as well ask some feminists, who share the exact same belief as him in not having to lift a finger in making yourself more attractive to the opposite sex. Look no further than feminist’s cause-du-jour, fat acceptance, a culture of de-improvement—and frankly, de-evolution—where women gain massive amounts of weight and then flaunt their blubber on social media, ready to attack any man who dare finds their display to be unattractive or repulsive.

Fat acceptance has become so pervasive that we had to dedicate one whole week on ROK tearing it to shreds, but in spite of that, not much has changed. America continues to get fatter and feminists continue to attempt to normalize obesity as actually being beautiful, just like how Rodger tried to convince himself of the idea that having a BMW would be attractive to women.

Take a look at this quote by Rodger:

“Everyone treated me like I was invisible. No one reached out to me, no one knew I existed. I was a ghost.”

Does that ring a bell to you? It’s almost identical to the rant we recently witnessed on the Louis CK show when a morbidly obese female went on to whine and bitch about how being a fat ass is not getting her the man she wants. It’s no surprise that fatties rushed to praise Louis CK for his act of sedition against men and acceptable standards of beauty. There is almost no difference between Rodger and a modern American woman who subscribes to feminist thought.

Now take a look at this passage:
“All of the hot, beautiful girls walked around with obnoxious, tough jock-type men who partied all the time and acted crazy. They should be going for intelligent gentlemen such as myself. Women are sexually attracted to the wrong type of man.”

Let’s do a swap on the genders:

“All the handsome men walked around with blonde bimbos who don’t have a good career like me and knowledge of reality television shows. These men should be going for a strong, empowered, independent, fabulous woman such as myself. Men are sexually attracted to the wrong type of woman.”

The overlap in mindset would be comical if it didn’t result in tragedy.

Another question worth asking is this: when today’s American woman can’t find the man of her dreams, does she look in the mirror and blame herself? No, she blames men for not finding her unattractiveness attractive. This is actively promoted by feminist thinkers on the most widely read American blogs like Buzzfeed, Gawker, and Huffington Post. Rodger shared this same viewpoint. His manifesto is dripping with entitlement of why girls don’t find him to be “marvelous” just because he happens to own a fancy pair of sunglasses. Feminists and Rodger, it turns out, are like two peas in a pod.

4. He believed that men should be chivalrous and kind, like feminists do
Please don’t forward us another listicle on a feminist-friendly blog about how men need to be nice, friendly, and awkwardly consensual by applying legalese speak in the bedroom before passionate fornication. Rodger believed much of the same, thinking that you had to be a “supreme gentleman” that catered to the material and emotional whims of women, doing everything possible to please them in exchange for a sexual reward. We can only imagine how nauseatingly “gentlemanly” he would have been if he actually managed to land a date on his terms.

I have no doubt he would have agreed with just about all the mainstream bullshit advice on being a gentleman, particularly the Thought Catalog piece The 20 Rules Of Being A Modern Gentleman. There is also a Buzzfeed quiz titled How Much Of A Gentleman Are You? that Rodger would have gotten an A+ on. The end result of his loneliness (killing six people) was obviously not gentlemanly, but before that rampage he treated girls with a gentlemanly shyness, reverence, and respect that feminists would have applauded him for. Rodger and feminists believed in the exact same demeanor that men should have around women.

5. He hated game, like feminists do

No one hates game more than feminists, who have gone so far as to equate it rape ([1], [2], [3]). They absolutely despise any attempt by men to improve their value in the sexual marketplace because then that would mean fewer men to put up with their obesity, short hair, or bad attitude. Rodger believed the same, going so far as becoming an active member in the PUAHate community which dedicated the bulk of their efforts to criticizing game and its adherents like a woman’s gossip circle. (On PUAhate there had been over 100 threads criticizing me and other ROK staff.)

Would you be surprised if I were to tell you right now that Rodger and a mainstream feminist shared the same views on PUAHate and game? I hope not, because that’s exactly what I found. A popular feminist writer who has worked for Newsweek, Jezebel, Buzzfeed, and Dissident magazine, Katie JM Baker, publicly declared that PUAs (i.e. us) are actually worse than PUA Hate.

“The men that lurk in the PuaHate forums are almost worse than the PUAs themselves…”

Let that soak in for a second. Feminist rage is so deep and emotional against game that they have supported a forum with “hate” in the title that cultivated and gave comfort to a mass murderer. I gave Baker a chance to change her opinion about believing a forum of hate was less worse than men who practice game:

[Image of a Twitter Feed, Transcript:

RoK: @katiejmbaker, for the record, do you still believe that we are worse than PUAHate? Or did the recent murder Rampage change your mind?

Katie Baker: lol, what are you even talking about?]

A feminist refused to reverse her position that game practitioners are not worse than Rodger’s favorite hangout. That tells me that Rodger and Baker would get along very well in their hate for men like us who teach game and try to improve men’s lives.

6. He subscribed to The Young Turks Youtube channel, a feminist darling

This is a minor point but one worth mentioning. We don’t know how knee-deep he was into The Young Turks liberal positions, but it’s a fact that he was not a subscriber to my channel or forum. We can only speculate as to how much TYT molded his pro-feminist view.

7. He hated alpha males, just like feminists do
Whenever a feminist encounters these parts, she immediately bashes our alpha/beta concept of male sexual hierarchy. She instead spouts tired cliches that are supposed to help men in their pursuit of sexual happiness but which actually do nothing of the sort:

“People are people!”
“Just be yourself!”
“Don’t be an asshole/creep/jerk/rando!”
“Having sexual standards is, like, misogynistic!”
Of course these phrases don’t explain human mating behavior and why some men get way more women than others, but that’s no matter since feminist theory does not have the slightest intention to explain the world in an accurate or truthful manner.

Like feminists, Rodger despised alpha males, who he called “obnoxious.” Here’s some relevant quotes from his manifesto:

“I noticed that there were two groups of cool, popular kids. There were the skateboarder kids, such as Vinny Maggio, Ashton Moio, Darrel, Wes, and Alex Dib. And then there were the boys who were popular with girls, including Vincent, Robert Morgan, and [redacted]. They all seemed so confident and aggressive. I felt so intimidated by them, and I hated them for it. I hated them so much, but I had to increase my standing with them. I wanted to be friends with them.

[…]

I thought all of the cool kids were obnoxious jerks, but I tried as best as I could to hide my disgust and appear “cool” to them. They were obnoxious jerks, and yet somehow it was these boys who all of the girls flocked to.”

If Rodger was alive right now, he’d be giving feminists high fives for sharing the exact same viewpoint on sexually superior but “horrible” males who have figured out the dating game and what women actually want.

8. He shared many personality traits with your modern American feminist
Rodger might as well have been a woman, which has raised speculation if he was actually gay. He took selfies like women. He was addicted to Facebook like women. He was obsessed with his appearance. He was narcissistic, vain, and materialistic. I wouldn’t be surprised if he was also addicted to his iPhone like your standard issue American woman. Heartiste does a good job of highlighting the similarities:

“[The effeminate male, like Rodger, is an] indictment of this infantile Millennial generation, which daily provides evidence that their ranks are filled with effeminate males who, like women, expect the world to cater their needs, no questions asked, no demands made. Elliot Rodger couldn’t stand how unfaaaair girls were to date uglier men than himself, how unfair life was that his car and clothes weren’t a magnet for hot white sorority chicks, how unfair the cosmic laws were to require of him a little bit of effort if he wanted to put an end to his virginity.

Egotistic, attention starved, solipsistic, passive aggressive, perpetually aggrieved, and unwilling to change when posing as a martyr feels so damn good… there’s your new American manlet, same as your new American woman.”

Like I already mentioned, a quick find/replace gender swap on his manifesto will pass the Turing test in convincing most spectators that he was actually a 22-year-old empowered feminist who participates in “Take Back The Night” walks and thinks that posting mindless #YesAllWomen tweets on Twitter comprises her good deed of the month. Rodger was effeminate and a negative person overall simply because he possessed beliefs that are undoubtedly shared by feminists.

9. He wanted to be a social justice warrior, just like feminists
He had a victim complex of being held down by invisible forces outside of his control. Feminists also believe that the “patriarchy” is holding them down, and they flock to Tumblr to reblog facile images and memes to spread lies that men make more than women for the same work, for example. These Tumblr crusades have even led to my own family being prank called at late hours, all because my words hurt their feelings, just like Rodger’s was hurt that pretty girls didn’t find him automatically attractive.

It turns out that Rodger was a budding social justice warrior, perhaps not far from establishing his own Tumblr beachhead:

“I formed an ideology in my head of how the world should work. I was fueled both by my desire to destroy all of the injustices of the world, and to exact revenge on everyone I envy and hate. I decided that my destiny in life is to rise to power so I can impose my ideology on the world and set everything right. I was only seventeen, I have plenty of time. I thought to myself. I spent all of my time studying in my room, reading books about history, politics, and sociology, trying to learn as much as I can.

[…]

I seriously started to consider working towards writing an epic story. I was always creating stories in my mind to fuel my fantasies. Usually those stories depicted someone like myself rising to power after a life of being treated unfairly by the world.

[…]

To be angry about the injustices one faces is a sign of strength. It is a sign that one has the will to fight back against those injustices, rather than bowing down and accepting it as fate. Both my friends James and Philip seem to be the weak, accepting type; whereas I am the fighter. I will never stand to be insulted, and I will eventually have my revenge against all those who insult me, no matter how long it takes.”

Both Rodger and feminists feel the only way to get what they want out of life is not self-improvement, but attacking others they disagree with. Their shared ideology is one of destruction. We have to wonder if Rodger would have eventually participated in any feminist event like SlutWalks to right the world of fantasy injustices that prevent them from being seen as beautiful, marvelous, gentlemanly, and so on.

10. He was not far away from being the epitome of a white knight, a man that feminists collect for their friend zones

If you see a feminist in the wild, a white knight won’t be far. He’s the man who enables her false view of the world and provides her with good feels and encouragement for her social justice campaigns. While Rodger wasn’t quite a white knight in this sense, he nailed all three white knight components:

“1. He is the ever-present servant.
2. He pines silently for a single woman.
3. That woman wants little to do with him, and it shows.”

In other words, if you inserted him in feminist company, he would be the glove to their chubby bear claw fingers. His personality is wholly compatible with how feminists believe men should behave: servile and wimpy while never taking real action on their sexual desires.

Conclusion

The only things in common that Rodger had with us is that (1) he wanted sex with attractive women, and (2) he had a functional penis. That’s it. The overlap of thought and belief between Rodger and feminists, however, should convince you beyond a reasonable doubt that Rodger was in fact a feminist, even if he didn’t himself know that his peg fit snugly into the feminist hole. I’ve actually met self-described feminists who were less feminist than Rodger was.

While I stand by my argument that game would have helped Rodger, I am beginning to wonder if being a feminist was the seed that drove him to desperation and delusion, eventually leading to a tragic loss of life. This line of thought is worth pursuing by people who want to understand why a man felt that taking other lives and his own was seen as the best solution. You definitely won’t read about this conclusion in the media, which is too busy trying to toss Rodger to our side like a hot piece of coal, even though Rodger shares absolutely no similarity in thought and behavior to game practitioners.

I have logically come to the conclusion that Rodger was in fact the first male feminist mass murderer that we have seen in America. I’m afraid that if the feminist ideology contained within Rodger’s head is allowed to continue spreading, we are likely to see more violent acts by men who believe in the exact same things that feminists do.

ionlycopenow #sexist incels.co

If I could just get a foid to suck my dick all my problems would be solved

It's not asking much. I know for a fact that foids enjoy sucking dick, as long as it's Chad. When they're horny (which is almost all of the time just like with men) they like sucking dick. unfortunately it's not my dick. Only chads. They don't have to be Stacy just at least a 4/10, my looksmatch.

Legit, if I could just find a foid like that I would be less depressed and would be more motivated. That's just how men are, if we aren't getting any our motivation dries up.

But I'm not even chadlite do that goes out of the window.

To_Live_is to_Serve #sexist incels.co

[LifeFuel] Imagine if the gender roles were reversed.

You could get a one-way open relationship with your looksmatch while also using tinder to get Prime top percentage Stacies. Your fellow men will be lazy and thousand cunt stare making you a real catch. You will not have to work; you could just get a virgin betabuxx 7/10 engineer wife without sexual experience.

You could give thousands of cream pies and not worry about pregnancy as you have total control over paternity and abortion. You get easy well paid job as receptionist while your looksmatch get a depressing manual labour job. You could sell your dirty undies for money while staying completely anonymous and you could show your currently subhuman body on webcam to get endless compliments and money by women who want to admire your body. You would get softer sentences and it would be a crime to make you homeless. You would not get attacked violently by other men as they have a great solidarity and would burn 1000 women alive instead of having your needs go unmet which the government would support.

All modern media would cater to your hedonistic desires while you would be praised for having the spirituality you have. Genes would be filtered out by selection of females instead of female selection meaning that your mass reproduction could be justified as a part of evolution. You could have sex with virgin teens illegally and they would be grateful for you taking their virginities and creampieing them. You could help the incel normies ascend in this world and get praised as a moral paragon by both the privileged and the unprivileged. You would get endless personalised compliments by sending a mass message on your real tinder intead of just the catfish account.

Women would instinctively protect you with their lives and send you gifts, expecting nothing in reward and getting joyfully over a dicpic which they would brag about getting from you on the internet. No face would be too foul and no penis too small for you to live a life of leisure and privilege and anyone who says otherwise would get deplatformed immediately. Women would still cook food and take care of children as betabuxxers do now. You would decide when sex is had in the relationship and media would uphold male pastimes like warfare, sport and gaming while condemning fraudulent make-up. Women who get caught frauding men get burned alive by jealous women as soon as you give the hint.

You wouldn't need to have a personality or an inner monologue to get by but having one would grant you great opportunities. You could wear shorts in public and get compliments IRL daily while being able to have sex with any woman who compliments you. You would be the archetype of an admirable moral person. Parties with high energy would be held to attract and amuse people like you and get you to open up and have sex like for young females. All men would have a similar smv; some difference in attraction would exist but fetishes even it all out. All female students and teachers would want you and especially you as you don't appear to be damaged by the cunt coaster. It would be paradise-like.

The true paradise comes from within but is a poor comfort when you are poor, wet and unwanted.

Gl_towers #homophobia antiyaoi.livejournal.com

For one thing, when I picture a straight guy being uncomfortable around gay men, I wouldn't think he was homophobic. I would think he was a guy. Most striaght men don't like the idea of being gay, or have others thinking that they're gay. It's normal to feel that way, and there's nothing wrong with it. Being uncomfortable does not equal homophobic.

When you said that it made you stomach turn, that doesn't mean you're homophobic. It just means you're straight. I don't think you should be ashamed for feeling that way. If you got turned on when thinking about to people of the same sex together; it may mean you might have gay tendecies, especially if you got all hot and bothered thinking about yuri, but you don't. It's your biology talking, and just because your biology isn't the same as some one who is gay doesn't make you a bad person. Just like being gay doesn't make them a bad person.

You'd be homophobic if you hated someone just because they were gay, without even knowing them. You'd hate anything that would be associated with homosexuality. But you don't. You have friends who are gay. It's like watching your friend eat pickels with mayo and peanut butter. The thought of eating that may make your stomach churn, but does that mean you dislike your friend any less for eating it? No.

So don't worry about it. You're normal.

Blackpill Rage #sexist #racist incels.co

[Discussion] Foids view men the same way jews view goyims.

Jews considers everyone else to be cattle and their sole purpose of existing is to serve jews. Foids view men the same way. Foids are actually just like jews just not as intelligent. They are manipulative, deceitful and lack any kind of empathy, guilt, or compassion. Jews are the #1 civilization destroyers and foids are a close second.

BabyFuck McGirlsex #psycho #sexist #fundie incels.co

[Based] The Salem Witch Trials were Based as Fuck!

The general consensus during the Salem Witch Trials was that :

* Foids are innately much more sinful and susceptible to damnation than men were


* Foids are weak and vulnerable


* Foids must attend to house affairs and not meddle in such things as proper for men, whose minds were stronger


* Witches were those who sought to take an exodus from the patriarchal religion


The Devil(((them))) gives power(((hypergamous enablers like tinder e.t.c))) to Witches (((foids))) so they can harm others (((cucks and bluepillers)))

Most of the executed were foids (no wonder. They are inherently evil). A few men were executed as well (cucks who had been bewitched by foids guile and trickery)

Is disregarding your looksmatch whilst running after chads cock not a form of witchcraft? Is being a filthy disgusting degenerate single mom not a form of witchcraft? Is having an abortion not a form of witchcraft? Is using your sacred love hole as chads public cum dumpster not a form of witchcraft?


"Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live" - (Exodus 22:18) or so says the Bible.

Various Commenters #racist #sexist amren.com

RE: Black Rule: Stories from the New South Africa, 2011-2015

(Saul)

South Africa is in freefall. There is nothing that can save it now. Whites can save themselves only by segregating from the negro. If I were the leader of 1 million well armed white men, this negro worship would end. I would hold TV networks responsible for what they broadcast. If they air something that enflames the negro, I would shut them down. In a white homeland, negroes would be forbidden. This is the only way now.

Sweden has passed the Congo and is nipping at the heels of South Africa for rape capital of the world. Why? Because white women have more political power in Sweden than anywhere else in the world. There is no point to a white homeland - literally not worth the moving costs - if women are still allowed to vote, sit on juries, and hold political office. They will simply import Africans and Arabs to rape and murder.

The feminist white woman is the architect of the destruction of the Western world. Still vindictive, shrill, irrational after 50 years and show no signs of wanting to protect it. They have sided with every grievance group against the white hetero male. They show no sign of growing up sadly.

It's simply evolution. It's not something they can avoid. The same behavior is displayed by all sexually dimorphic mammals.

Think of the life cycle of a lion. A male lion will find a mate and have several cubs. The female is always on the lookout for aggressive males outside of her pride. She will entice any that she finds to come and fight her male. If the outsider male wins, he will kill her cubs and mate with her right then and there. The father lion always gathers up the bodies of his dead cubs and lays down beside them to slowly die of blood loss and infection while the mother of those cubs mates with the male who killed them.

When you hear of the Rotherham and Malmo rape gangs, as well as how white women defend them, understand that no words can sway a lioness to fight to save her children. Women are no different. They cannot be convinced.

Repeal the 19th. Repeal the Fifth Reform.

(CMK)

Your analogy is made even more powerful by the fact that the male allows the female to do this: he allows her to sabotage his pride, and risk the death of his children. It's the same in the West today: females only get away with this because the men allow them to. I suspect that, if lions have the mental capacity to think this far, the defeated male lion doesn't resist and kill the subversive female because he believes that it's simply the way things are in the world. Western men are the same: they don't understand that there was a time when women didn't have as much as they do now, and that the problems which exist now were more unimaginable than fantasies then.

I'm not advocating for killing women, but you get the point.

(Robert Kelly)

Sky News went to a township near Johannesburg to do our own impromptu survey asking men whether they had ever forced a woman to have sex. . .

In total, 28 out of the 38 that answered said they had raped a woman, and many even explained how and why. [Sky News, September 19, 2013]

And white men are accused of being the paragon of rapists and sex fiends by feminists everywhere. The only reason why women have rights is because white men have made it possible. If white men disappeared tonight and white women were left at the tender mercies of black and brown men, the above would be the result.

Left to their own devices, I don't think black and brown men see anything wrong with forcing themselves on a woman. To them, rape would only be wrong if another man raped a woman that "belonged" to him and even then, that's because of property rights not because he thinks rape is wrong.

(IstvanIN)

I know we shouldn't judge a book by its cover but look at those pictures above. Or look at the pictures of any of the blacks who have murdered young White people. The White young men and women are beautiful, the blacks not just beastly but clearly unevolved. They are not us. They are not our evolutionary, moral or intellectual equals. How did the charade of equality ever take such a foothold? How could so many White people be convinced of such an absurd idea?

Great Post - I really think their hatred of us and the unspeakable violence directed at us is precisely this - pathological envy or jealousy of our (relative) beauty and we must be destroyed, no matter how successful the black person is, he or she has pretty much told whites they despise them. Their natural enemy is the mirror and we can never make that right. The contrived bravado, arrogance, third - person references, huge gold chains, "grills", speech and dress codes, even the way they hold a glock, screams animus and insecurity.

And that is why, I am sure, so many black women go over the top with hair coloring, make-up, hair styles and clothes. They know they can never look like us no matter how much they repaint the old barn.

(Vir magnus)

In recent years, the white race has been portrayed to be the utmost perpetrators of racism, injustice, misogyny, homophobia, brutality, and genocide; they bring nothing but destruction. If this is all accurate, then one can only assume that South Africa would benefit considerably from the transfer of white power to black power within their government. Contrary to the fallacies that liberal professors convey into the minds of our youth, the complete opposite was true.
No one will discuss the fact that South Africa is now the headquarters of rape and HIV, that "94%" of murderers face no punishment. And that this trend worsens as the white population decreases.
This should come as no surprise, given that the average IQ of Africa as a whole stands at less than 70. It wouldn't have taken a rocket scientist to predict a rapid decline in the standard of living of South Africans post Apartheid.

I am curious to know if Robin Diangelo's anti white conceptions would change if she were to take a two year trip to Nyanga, South Africa. Perhaps gang rape would be enough to change her mentality.

(Frank Jones)

A more grotesque outcome one can scarcely imagine. Apartheid was a more humane and eminently more sensible system of governance.

Alexi Sargeant #fundie firstthings.com

Jesus is not an undead monster


I
t’s a cliché of irreverent internet humor: atheists celebrating the Easter season by wishing their Christian countrymen a “Happy Jewish Zombie Day.” The joke is easy to dismiss—but perhaps there’s something to be gained from taking it seriously, more seriously than the jokers intend. How correct is it to compare the resurrected Jesus to depictions of the undead in popular culture?

Zombies, as popularized by George Romero in Night of the Living Dead and currently depicted on The Walking Dead, are mindless, rotting, infected corpses that hunger for human flesh. The classic zombie’s movement is invariably described as “shambling.” Jesus, by contrast, is trampling down death by death, as the Orthodox Paschal troparion puts it.

The accounts in the Gospels of Jesus’s post-Resurrection appearances suggest that his body is not decaying and necrotic but glorious, albeit with a sometimes veiled glory. First Mary Magdalene, then the disciples on the road to Emmaus, do not immediately recognize Jesus. Only when he wills it are their eyes opened to recognize their risen Lord. Then they worship him. Many disciples, seeing the risen Jesus, embrace his feet and do him homage. His feet are not the decomposing and discolored feet of a Romero ghoul—and yet they are wounded. The resurrected Jesus bears scars from his crucifixion and shows them to his doubting apostles, even inviting Thomas to probe his side. This may have been a frightening moment for Thomas, but the fright is more akin to abashed awe than appalled horror. His response, after all, is “My Lord and My God” (still the humble disciple’s prayer upon seeing the Body of our Lord in the Sacrament of the altar).

what of mummies? The climate of the Middle East, after all, is more conducive to mummies than to zombies. And Lazarus, resurrected by Jesus, lurched out of the grave in his burial cloths. Alas for the mummy fans, Jesus laid aside his burial cloths in the tomb, as both Luke and John attest. And his body was not anointed after death, as was customary (and requisite for Egyptian mummies), because he rose again, leaving the women who came to anoint his body the joyful mystery of the empty tomb. Stories of mummies often involve ancient curses elicited by trespassers from thousand-year-old gravesites. The grave could not contain Jesus for half a week. And as far as ancient curses go, Jesus’s death and Resurrection defeated the most ancient curse of all, that of sin. For everything a mummy might represent, Jesus represents that thing’s defeat.
There is one undead being often depicted as, if not quite glorious, at least glamorous: the vampire. Vampires tend to be physically attractive (if pale) and supernaturally powerful. Yet they are driven by a homicidal thirst for blood—rather the reverse of Jesus’s offering up his own blood for his Church, which we believe to be a sacrifice he makes daily at Mass. Vampires, whose legend originated in early eighteenth-century Europe, may well be a perversion of this very sacrament, their unslakable thirst a demonic parody of Jesus’s ever-flowing blood given freely for all. One popular tradition holds that vampires cannot enter a house unless invited by the inhabitant. Jesus in his post-Resurrection appearances freely comes and goes, sometimes dropping in on his frightened disciples unannounced in the upper room.


What if Jesus were a ghost? The disciples themselves feared this. But Jesus reassured them: “Why are you troubled? And why do questions arise in your hearts? Look at my hands and my feet, that it is I myself. Touch me and see, because a ghost does not have flesh and bones as you can see I have.” Jesus even eats a piece of baked fish in front of them—a playfully quotidian act that reassures them he is not a mere spirit but a body that can breathe and eat and be touched by the doubtful, like Thomas.

Stephenie Wolfstar #fundie quotev.com

This one should keep us thinking.
This is a true story of something that just happened a few years ago in USC.

There was a professor of philosophy there who was a deeply committed atheist. His primary goal was for one required class was to spend the entire semester proving that God does not exist. To prove that God couldn't possibly exist. His students were always afraid to argue with him because of his impeccable logic. Sure, some had argued in class time, but no one had ever really gone up against him because of his reputation. At the end of every semester, on the last day, he would say to his 300 students: "If there is anyone here who still believes in Jesus, stand up!" In twenty years, no one ever stood up. They knew what he was going to do next. He would say: "Because anyone who believes in God is a fool. If God existed, he could stop this piece of chalk from hitting the ground and breaking. Such a simple task to prove that He is God, and yet He can't do it." And every year, he would drop the chalk onto the tile floor of the classroom and it would shatter into a million pieces. All of the students would do nothing but stop and stare. Most of the students thought that God couldn't possibly exist. Certainly, a number of Christians had slipped through, but for twenty years, they had been too afraid to stand up.

Well, a few years ago there was a freshman who happened to enroll. He was a Christian, and had heard the stories about his professor. He was required to take the class for his major, and he was afraid. But for three months that semester, he prayed every morning that he would have the courage to stand up no matter what the professor said, or what the class might of thought. Nothing they said could ever shatter his faith...he hoped.

Finally, the day came. The professor said: "If there is anyone here who still believes in God, stand up!" The professor and the class of 300 students looked at him, shocked, as he stood up at the back of the classroom. The professor shouted, "You fool! If God existed, he would keep this piece of chalk from breaking when it hit the ground!" He proceeded to drop the chalk, but as he did, it slipped out of his fingers, off his shirt cuff, onto the pleat of his pants, down his leg, and off of his shoe. As it hit the ground, it simply rolled away....unbroken. The professor's jaw dropped as he stared at the chalk. He looked up at the young man, and then ran out of the lecture hall. The young man, who had stood, proceeded to walk to the front of the class and shared his faith in Jesus for the next half an hour. 300 students stayed and listened as he told of God's love for them and of His power through Jesus.

You have two choices:
1. Pretend you never read this.
2. Pass this along to your Christian and non-Christian friends, giving them encouragement we all need everyday.

When you choose option two, you have chosen to STAND UP.

In the light of jokes we tell to one another for a laugh, this is a little different.
but t
This is not intended to be a joke, it's not funny, it's intended to get you thinking.......

Isn't it funny how simple it is for people to trash God and then wonder why the world is going to hell?

Isn't it funny how we believe what the newspapers say, but question what the Bible says?

Isn't it funny how everyone wants to go to heaven, provided they do not have to believe, think, say, or do anything the Bible says? Or is it scary?

Isn't it funny how someone can say, "I believe in God," but still follow Satan? (who, by the way, also "believes" in God)

Isn't it funny how you can send a thousand jokes through e-mail and they spread like wildfire but when you start sending messages regarding the Lord, people think twice about sharing?

Isn't it funny how the lewd, crude, vulgar, and obscene pass freely through cyberspace, but the public of discussion of Jesus is suppressed in schools and work spaces?

Isn't it funny how someone could be fired up for Christ on Sunday, but be an invisible Christian for the rest of the week?

Are you laughing?!

Isn't it funny how when you tell someone this, you won't because you're not sure what they believe, or what they will think of you for telling them?

Isn't it funny how I can be more worried about what other people think of me than what God thinks of me?

Will YOU pass this on?

I did.

mylifeistrash #sexist #psycho incels.co

A real communist system would seize women and make them work as prostitutes or forced wives since their vagina holds near infinite value

Vaginas and women in general, especially white women, are worth a shit load of money. Even ugly old ones can get rich men with ease.

Real communists would demand no rights for women and have their value go to the state, or be redistributed.

If that was the case, I think a lot of men would be okay with communism, since most men are broke and have no future anyway. Sadly if there was "communism", all the seized value would probably just go to women.

CH #fundie heartiste.wordpress.com

[A woman attempted to break her boyfriend out of prison]

What is the point of CH posting an endless procession of these chicks dig jerks stories? Is it to gloat? Well, yes. But it’s also to remind everyone how utterly different female sexual psychology is from male sexual psychology. Most people lose sight of that difference, or they try hard to ignore it. And with good reason; it’s unpleasant to ponder. But game as it’s understood wouldn’t work if men and women responded to the same mate value cues. If that were the case, whatever women did to maximize their appeal to men would work equally as well for men seeking to maximize their appeal to women.

It doesn’t, because men and women are radically alien to each other in some very important respects. There aren’t any men landing choppers in prison yards to free the thug babees they luv.

Atavisionary #fundie atavisionary.com

He complains (rightly) that the progs in the entertainment industry use their influence over plot lines to create propaganda for children, when they are least able to critically evaluate it and so soak that crap in like a sponge. I remember once we were talking about education around my teenage nephew and he, at different points, both said “that is sexist” and “that is racist.” Poor guy. This is probably more to do with the school system than cartoons, but same difference (same same, but different?). Keep in mind that I do sort of, maybe try to tone myself down at family events. Apparently dismissing blog posts isn’t the only thing I do halfheartedly. After the third or so statement of this sort, being the cold-hearted, insensitive asshole I am, I responded with “reality is racist” and he suddenly seemed to be deep in thought. I didn’t hear about being racist again. It turns out crazy uncles might have more influence than low-IQ education majors! Who knew?

In any event, I almost never watch TV anymore except stuff I can be very preselective with on the internet for this very reason. Every time I give a show a chance, which is rare anymore, I am invariably disappointed and disgusted by the progressive parasites infesting the story. For example, I like gore and zombies. Who doesn’t? I was told The Walking Dead was a pretty decent show and reluctantly gave it a chance. The first 4 seasons were on netflix so I watched them. For the most part it was pretty good, but they just can’t leave out the prog propaganda. A mindless show revolving around killing zombies can’t just be about killing zombies; it also must be progressive. At least the progs finally did something right though, a post-apocalyptic wasteland seems the appropriate setting and endpoint of progressivism. The third and final straw happened in the last episode in which they introduced some gay dudes and had them make out. Ya, I am not shitting you. The gay dudes make out in the show. I have a very bad feeling that those two are going to stay on as characters for a long time. I am not going to find out, though, because I am done watching it. It isn’t that I have anything against gays, like everything else in human psychology (most importantly intelligence), I am pretty sure it has biological origins and that they are unfortunate misfits born with a bad combination of alleles. Gnon was not kind to them. But understanding that does not mean I want to see them make out (or have civilization cater to them or give them special victim status). Even then, that isn’t even the major problem for me (though it is an important problem). The major problem is the er…hrmm northern aggression of it all. It is the fact that these assholes can’t keep their fucking values to themselves. They HAVE to try to propagandize me and everyone else who don’t want to have anything to do with them or their values; even if we would never bother or hinder them in their personal lives at all if they just left us alone. It isn’t enough that I am (or was) willing to just let them be if they let me be. They HAVE to get in my face about it. Fuck them. Goodbye libertarianism.

...

It isn’t that other people have different values that bothers me, it is that people are trying to forcibly push their values on me and others who may be ambivalent or in strong disagreement. Most important is that the values they push are objectively shit. Ya, maybe I haven’t been a paragon of virtue in the past, but at least when pressed I can objectively evaluate what values are best for civilization as a whole. I don’t pretend like self-interested behavior is anything other than self-interested behavior. If people disagree with a set of values they should be able to disassociate and allow Gnon to be the judge of who is right or wrong. We aren’t being allowed that privilege. This northern aggression can not stand.

EDIT: I just remembered there was another thing that was dumb in the show. There was a group at a hospital being lead by a small framed women. This was just stupid, in such an apocalyptic setting strength and endurance are what matter most and men wouldn’t follow someone who would never be able to keep up with them. Post-institutions affirmative action would not apply and she would have been demoted to a support role she was actually suited to.

FACEandLMS #sexist incels.co

REMINDER: if all men (e.g. politicians, soldiers) were as blackpilled as incels, women's rights would be taken away overnight

We would return to traditionalism within a generation. Tinder would be outlawed. Children would grow up in two-parent families because women would know that if they left their husband, Mr Govt wouldn't be there to step-in. Women wouldn't need to worry about muh wage gap cuz they'd be at home raising their children instead of paying a DIFFERENT woman to do it (daycare BTFO). Less men would go ER. STD rates would fall. The white birthrate would increase (I'm not white btw, cucktears so I can't really be a white nationalist).

What would women be able to do about it if we decided enough's enough? Fight us with their sheer, masculine strength? Take up arms? No. They'd do what they did in Iran in the 1970s when the govt decided to take away women's rights: they'd accept it. Apparently, Iran was pretty westernized in terms of women's dress-codes. Fast forward to a patriarchal govt (AN ACTUAL ONE), and women's rights were blown the fuck out like an incel's dignity on Tinder. What did the women do? Join a women's army? Overpower men with their brute strength? NO. They said: "Oh well. Dammit." And accepted it.

Women only get away with what men allow them and help them to. Women need feminist, cuckold men to be "free". And before CuckTears labels me a 17yo basment dweller, I am actually in a STEM job and have a degree, Women may not like what I am saying but they can't deny it: women couldn't do FUCK-ALL if men decided enough's enough. Which woman reading this is ready to try to beat up a lot of guys to fight for their continued freedom? Which woman COULD?

inb4 Ronda Rhousey is strong and represents all women's potential (she would get her ass kicked eventually by a man anyway) inb4 "this is why he's incel because of his views on feminism. women can totally read his aura. It can't be that women aren't attracted to ugly faces" inb4 offtopic offtangent femtalk, ignoring the cold fact: women could not do FUCK-ALL if all men were incel and decided enough is enough. I think I may have put enough pre-emptive rebuttals in this post to make it unscreenshottable by CuckTears. If you don't see it on CuckTears then this is the case.

Various Commenters #sexist incels.co

(Ping And Pong)

[Hypocrisy] GigaChad can't film video without being sexually harassed by foids

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IOCOEU5etf4

Within his short time of filming and interviewing this GigaChad has been groped, smacked on the ass and literally licked by random foids walking by in the background, not only is this proof for the immeasurable lust that foids have for chad dick, but shows the absolute hypocrisy of foids which cry about sexual harassment.

Tell me IT, how in anyway can your mental gymnastics get around this one? They will not touch this.

(manicel)

Lmao it's hard to believe that the whores complain about being "sexually harassed" it's like complaining that u have too much money

(Mainländer)

Sexual harassment= ugly guy expressing his libido in any way shape or form in the presence of a female.

Liptusg #sexist reddit.com

Many incels are neurally incompatible with the female personality

This is a topic which has earned some coverage in a lot of the 'proto-blackpill' manosphere communities of their day, and some which relate to it here, but I think it might be worth encapsulating into a more poignant declaration. That is, to address the seeming disparity ( From an outsider's perspective ) between the idealistic yearning to the harsh reality and bring them into reconciliation.

And that is, many of the men who are in the incel demographic ( And I say many because you can still be incel and possess a heavily neurotypical mindset or adhere to certain Bluepilled doctrines ) are both neurodivergent enough, introspective enough and wise enough ( regardless of cognitive ability ) to automatically set themselves completely apart from the spectrum of coexistence with femininity. More succinctly, hypergamy and unattractiveness aside, they just don't have what it takes to put up with the myriad faults of female nature and wouldn't actually be able to find common ground with women even while passing initial mate selection, despite instinctively yearning for the sex or affection.

In a Chad's body, they would be forced to emulate the lifestyle of the exalted Redpiller ideal, the plate-spinner, who pumps and dumps yet never settles down because he is disillusioned with women's behavior as people ( for good reason ) and can't really tolerate all the nonsense or immorality that comes with 'committing' or trying to love one. The 'girlfriend' of his dreams his a mirage, an organism that does not actually exist on earth, a unicorn that acts like a man, not like an actual homo sapiens female.

But let's elaborate more on what that female personality is, and why most of the incels who are, and I'm searching for a term which is actually hard to put into words here - who are ruminative ( a synonym of wise, actually ), not as impulsive, who find themselves operating in a mindset of taking a few minutes in any new situation to existentially ponder the meaning, consequences and rightfulness of their own decisions and those of others ( Something which is predominantly an atypical masculine and non-feminine approach by the way, just look at the gender of most philosophers ), if you find yourself resonating with that, then it is very likely that you will not resonate with femininity under any circumstance.

Any so-called 'potential partner' is going to be predictively broken up with just by witnessing her actions for a minute, before it even has to come to it physically, just like a calculator has the results to your math equation before you even finish going through the motions. The gap between masculinity and femininity is wide enough that keep in mind, even among NPC's, normies, with only a tinge of 'positive masculinity' at it's finest and a flat 0 at Wisdom score, it is still the number 1 factor in the breakup rates of couples and why they change relationships like socks. Whether it be the man realizing he's being used as a status object and getting sick of it or the woman deciding he isn't good enough for her anymore, they just either didn't have the foresight to see it or they never actually cared and well long-term plate spinning ( Or Chad-fishing ). Look at how surprised some of the participants in say, Jersey Shore are, when their relationship which was built on superficial normie trash breaks down over superficial normie trash. Does it surprise anyone else? Here's a secret for the smug women and bluepillers reading this - you are merely one level above them. Your superficial relationships founded on social status, body language, 'ambitions' and looks ( as much as you hate to admit it ) are just one tiny iteration above tan spray and club swagger.

Now let's elaborate more on what is female personality and why it's so discordant to any man who can't bring himself down to it's level. First of all, when I say female personality, I mean it - there is literally just one, it is, contrary to all protestations, a monolith. You know who's the chief proponent of this theory? Women. Every time a woman tells you "You don't understand what women want", or "No woman is ever going to touch you with a 10-foot of stick if you do X" and "Women like a man who is BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH" and "You creep women out when..", they're all confirming it. I bring it up to them every single time that they make an affirmative statement about women, and they always remain speechless.

Liking one horror movie over the other or preferring hiking over Netflix, being a ballerina or psychologist, wearing this crop-top instead of those short-shorts, political alignment, religion, none of these are necessarily core personality differences. You could manufacture a robot that does all of the above combined, programming to vote and to recite lines from books ( AKA female ideology and spirituality ) included. When it comes to truly 'groundbreaking' distinctions, AWALT. All the female dating profiles on reddit might as well be procedurally generated templates of each other, starkly separate from the male ones. When it comes to opinions, when is the last time that the women of AskWomen, of TrollX, of IT, of CreepyPM's, of Tumblr, anywhere, had a major debate or fracture over something to the extent male demographics do? What's the number of women coming here, or to ForeverAlone, or to Men'sRights ( While there are female MRA's like the HoneyBadgers, check out the ratio between female MRA's to male feminists ) or to MGTOW in order to get our perspective things in a non-confrontational way to the same extent men visit even the most radical female spaces to offer their whiteknighting support? When was the last time female IT users disagree with each other about men's role in the universe? When was the last time a woman went 'Nobody wants to date an X' and instead of getting 5000 upvotes and 'yu go gurl' from other women, got a debate from other women instead, similarly to how there are always men who would be willing to say they wouldn't mind something in a woman that even most people would, including extreme insecurities or mental illnesses or weight or clinginess or what have you? Ein gender, Ein matriarchy, Ein hamster.

Well, is the unified female monolith at least a force of goodness? It is not. Let us actually skip over the known and rehashed attributes of hypergamy, superficiality, manipulativeness, capriciousness, solipsism and frivolity which have earned femininity the scathing rebukes it's received from pretty much almost every society to ever walk the earth until the point where they leveraged sex in order to shame everyone from even thinking about doing it. Let's focus on how women perceive themselves to be on their 'best behavior', which, you might be surprised to find out, is not at all working in their favor coming as it is from a brain so philosophically bankrupt and so out of tune with the evolutionary higher faculties of ( And I don't mean intelligence, that is what they think it means, because they can't grasp it ) mankind that it doesn't realize why would anyone reject it's framework.

Pardon me in advance for the upcoming rant, but one can't really enter the female mindspace properly without it - "I want a man who has his shit together! You better have some ambitions, you better have some accomplishments if you want to be with me! I WANT ( I want I want I want I want I wannnnnnt ) a guy who isn't afraid to take what he wants, who is assertive and dominant and aggressive when he needs to be, don't be a fucking doormat, don't be NEEDY ew, although I myself am insecure about my body and need someone to motivate me for the gym and baby me in my DD/lg fetish teehee, oh and for god's sake have some SOCIAL GRACES. Be confident and charming, don't you know how important social graces are? I want a functional man, not a boy, you have to know what you're doing."

Speaking of the monolith, can you find any female profile on r4r which isn't like that in whole or in part, in spirit if not in the explicit and intentionally highlighted priorities? Try it. Now, the average woman looks at the above and thinks to herself "Yass queen SLAY", this is peak performance to her. She considers this to be the most wholesome, deep, reasonable attitude humanly attainable. Thanks to the decadent evil empire and gynocentric atmosphere that we've been under the spell of for a long time now, maybe even you might fail to see the absolute sewage that underlines the gung-ho tirade at first glance.

You know what I see? I seen an application for a sycophantic leech, not a love interest. A total obsession with materialistic, external pursuits and one's position in the societal rat race due to incapability of actually loving anyone for who they are as opposed to what they do, and seeing them as 'success objects' in the same vein that women complain of men only evaluating them as 'sex objects'. I see a total bratty, undeveloped obsession with one of philosophy's biggest vices ( Big surprise, remember the role of women in morality and philosophy? ) - judging a book by it's cover rather than it's content and caring to an extreme length about how someone says something as opposed to what they're saying, which is part and parcel of hindbrain herd behavior. Women are under the impression that their fanatic obsession in that regard is a virtue, and that a good man is one who adapts to it rather than discounts it. It is not, there's a reason why it doesn't figure so prominently in men's dating profiles. And finally, yet another glaring whimsical and infantile female habit which they credit to their superiority - the lack of willingness to give someone any leeway or acceptance whatsoever, to put principle and ideal above ego and feelings, once again, a cornerstone of advanced morality. And once again, something that almost every man instinctively does for women. Put aside the 'muh social skills' ( Or more correctly, women skills, because they're the only ones demanding all the crazy eggshell-stepping ) and 'muh assertiveness', and put themselves in the shoes of the other side, and try to find goodness at the most fundamental level that it really matters, because they have this non-Darwinian sensation and guideline deep down inside of "I should be magnanimous moreso than I am judgemental". Does that ever happen? You can tell from the dating profiles, the answer is obviously not. And that's what makes the female personality what it is.

And this is just one sliver of the grander shit-show. Plenty has been written about the shit-tests even once you're already in a relationship, the double standards, the branch-swinging if you ever fail the shit-test, the mental games, and all for what - the craved female submission state, which let me emphasize, is not 'love' in any sense. The condition which is reached whereupon the female has deemed you to be a successful status/gene leeching target and begins feigning ( Naturally she'll say it isn't feigned, until you stop being Chad to her, and become her "abusive and toxic ex" ) all the sticky affection and sexual favors associated with the 'positive' aspects of female personality, like a colorful and inviting carnivorous plant attracting a fly inside. But any incel which understands the entire process, upon it's carnal pros and philosophical cons, is also one who will never be compatible with a woman, even if he attained physical desirability.

Lonesh #sexist incels.co

[Hypocrisy] Foids want equal rights, but don't take equal responsibility

I often think what is the 1 thing what pisses me off about females, it has to be hypocrisy. That being the "equal" bollocks they sprout on about every fucking day. Either a news story in the paper, on TV or online you will hear something regarding it in some form or another.

Recently the abortion bullshit has cropped up again which has reminded me about the selfish intent of these bitches. So let me get this straight.... What they're saying it, they want to bang who they want and choose who to have kids with and whilst doing that happily kill a child in the process..... and they get away with this, not surprised really. Safe sex is too difficult for foids minds to comprehend, adult responsibility is something too extreme and wrong for a foid to even think about, "teehee, don't worry, just going to have a casual gangbang with 10+ men and get creamed in, then going to have an abortion" like no. YOU chose to do that, now you're pregnant, so fucking deal with it you selfish CUNT.

Just 1 thing out of many which makes my blood fucking boil. You are KILLING A CHILD. Apparently no foid in the world sees it as this.

Another main thing is the violence against women, this is simple to explain. Foids argue these men are controlling, first off it's very rare people are controlling without a single reason to explain it, unless they're mentally ill/insane, which is rare. There is a REASON for EVERYTHING. This reason is because this man has been hurt by either the foid hes "abusing" or other foids in the past. If somehow his current gf/wife isn't the problem, then she needs to blame it on other foids in the man's life for his hatred against her. These things don't happen for no reason woman....Or, you could use your "equality" bullshit and just leave...but apparently that's too difficult for you, is it cuz your woman? Yes....yes I think it is.

Lastly we all know about the equal pay/work rights bullshit, now obviously there's proof men get paid more than women in a variety of "similar" jobs, but they're a reason for this again. Foids are constantly checking their phones at work all fucking day, even talking with colleagues instead of working, whilst men do their fucking job. Not to mention when foids complain why foids aren't "being given" opportunities in politics or being a CEO of a company/business. Yet again there's a reason for this, you're not given the job just because you're a fucking woman you stupid dumb bitch, people are given the job based on their skills, work ethic and intelligence, not based on whether they have a pair of fucking tits and for "PC" bullshit.

Now fuck off with your equality bullshit, you stupid fucking whores. Go find another criminal on tinder and get raped and strangled by him, it's what you deserve you stupid cunts.

kirkz2006@yahoo.com #fundie groups.yahoo.com

[Species] appear fully-formed with no evidence they evolved, period.

The entire evolutionary history of these species doesn't exist. And, evolutionists have are lame excuses that they can't even agree on why the fossil evidence is missing.

This fatal problem to all but those that want to have blind faith in theory that should have been discarded decades ago:

"The abrupt appearance of higher taxa in the fossil record has been a perennial puzzle. Not only do characteristic and distinctive remains of phyla appear suddenly, without known ancestors, but several classes of a phylum, orders of a class, and so on, commonly appear at approximately the same time, without known intermediates." *James W. Valentine and *Cathryn A. Campbell, "Genetic Regulation and the Fossil Record," in American Scientist Vol. 63, November-December, 1975, p. 673.

The order in which fossils are found in the Cambrian also contradicts the theory of evolution:


"The actual percentage of areas showing this progressive order from the simple to the complex is surprisingly small. Indeed formations with very complex forms of life are often found resting directly on the basic granites. Furthermore, I have in my own files a list of over 500 cases that attest to a reverse order, that is, simple forms of life resting on top of more advanced types." Walter E. Lammert, Growing Doubts: Is Evolutionary Theory Valid? p. 4.


BTW, evolutionists are notorious form naming the same species something different at various stages of history:


"Dr. Eldredge [American Museum of Natural History, New York City] was asked, `Do paleontologists name the same creatures differently when they are found in different geological periods?' He replied that this happens, but they are mistakes. When asked the same question, Dr. Patterson [British Museum, London] replied, `Oh, yes, that's very widely done.' Next he was asked, 'That doesn't seem quite honest. You wouldn't do that, would you?' He said that he hoped he wouldn't . .

Would not this practice make a lot more species? Dr. Raup [Chicago Museum] said it would; perhaps 70 percent of the species described [in the fossil rocks] are later found to be the same as existing species, so 70 percent of the new species named should not have been [given new names but were], either through ignorance or because of the ground rules used by the taxonomists." L.D. Sunderland, Darwin's Enigma (1988), pp. 130-131.

"An assistant of Dr. Eldredge, who was studying trilobite fossils at the American Museum, explained to the author how he made the decision on naming a new species: `I look at a fossil for about two weeks and then if I think it looks different enough, I give it a new name.' So it is simply a matter of judgment with no firm ground rules." Op. cit., p. 131.

Darrel #fundie kasuto.net

You know, when we started this war, I was so angry I couldn't see straight. I wanted to see them suffer for killing our countrymen. For coming onto our territory and starting something up. Saddam is an evil man and needed to be taken out..even if he doesn't have to do with 9/11. Think about it - he was gassing his own people! It's cruelty to just turn and look the other way, knowing that people are dying. It's like Germany and the holocaust (atleast then we didn't know exactly). We may not be the "world police," but I think someone has to look out for those who can't look out for themselves. I wish America had come into Germany long before it did; I'd have the majority of my family. But all I have is my grandma, her brother, and her sister. Everyone else died on my mother's side. (Until people realize that Saddam = bad, I'm going to keep repeating this story.)

Most of America makes me sick. It has no memory. "Der, what's a flag?! What's Nationalism?! EL OH EL! I HATE AMERICA EVEN THOUGH I'M AMERICAN!" I wish I could just ship all of these people back to their "native" country so that America will have a little more elbow room and a little more common sense. If you hate America and are living in it, then GET THE FUCK OUT!!!! We don't want you here, bashing your own country, and bashing those in it. I don't like to be called an 'idiot' just because a big majority of America is stupid. Hell, a lot of America is the smartest, too (Bill Gates, anyone?), and we have some of the highest technology. But I see that that is overlooked.

If I could have my way, I would blow up just about the entire world. I'd bomb Canada for calling us stupid Americans, I'd bomb the UK because they have their head up their butts and think America is foolish and never ever has common sense what-so-ever, and I'd bomb Mt. Fuji in Japan because the damn Japos are racists!! XD (That really doesn't have to do with the state we're in, but I felt I had to include it. Come on, laugh! :3) Pretty much the only places I wouldn't bomb would be the poles and Australia. Rest of the world can kiss my patriotic ass, because I'm sick and tired of them always ganging up on me like I'm a bad guy. I never did anything - look at our side for once. Yes, we're evil because we go in and attack people, but we're also good too. We supply places with food, medicine, and rush out immediately to go help.

Here's an idea, and I wish I could give it to Mr. President ;
Let's become isolated for one week. There is proof that we could run on our own without any exports or imports. It wouldn't be as decent quality of life, but it would be doable. We should not go out and help anyone, trade with anyone, or do anything with any other country. Pull right out Iraq, Iran, Korea, all of those places, and especially Africa. No longer help anyone - just help ourselves. We'll see how well the world can survive without America.

(I personally think we should go into other countries and stop their fighting and tell them what to do. They're like children fighting; someone has to be the responsible adult and break up the fight. If they can't see that they are fighting like little children, then someone has to prove it to them and make it stop. We can't have the world falling to pieces because the "UK" is afraid of stopping it.)

[ on abortion ]

I am against abortion.

o sum this up, rape/abortion victims seem to have a more negative outcome than a woman who was raped and kept her child. Emotionally, she is weakened from the rape, and losing her own child will take it's toll. Physically, she may never have children again.
"Good can come from evil." Rape is evil, and a baby is good.

I'm kind of in the middle of this whole thing. I see both sides. I don't agree with either (but I do agree mostly on no to abortion)
I don't know about the mother health thing though. I mean, if she's going to die, at least she lived a good life (hopefully), and the baby would get to live. Mothers usually love their children, and would give up their life for their children. Most women feel this motherly bond. They would hope their baby got to live a good life, and make something out of themselves. It's a choice the mother should make, but on the downfall, the baby will never get to live if the mother gets the abortion.

[ on war ]

If I could have my way, I would blow up just about the entire world. I'd bomb Canada for calling us stupid Americans, I'd bomb the UK because they have their head up their butts and think America is foolish and never ever has common sense what-so-ever, and I'd bomb Mt. Fuji in Japan because the damn Japos are racists!! XD (That really doesn't have to do with the state we're in, but I felt I had to include it. Come on, laugh! :3) Pretty much the only places I wouldn't bomb would be the poles and Australia. Rest of the world can kiss my patriotic ass, because I'm sick and tired of them always ganging up on me like I'm a bad guy. I never did anything - look at our side for once. Yes, we're evil because we go in and attack people, but we're also good too. We supply places with food, medicine, and rush out immediately to go help.

Here's an idea, and I wish I could give it to Mr. President Bush;
Let's become isolated for one week. There is proof that we could run on our own without any exports or imports. It wouldn't be as decent quality of life, but it would be doable. We should not go out and help anyone, trade with anyone, or do anything with any other country. Pull right out Iraq, Iran, Korea, all of those places, and especially Africa. No longer help anyone - just help ourselves. We'll see how well the world can survive without America.

(I personally think we should go into other countries and stop their fighting and tell them what to do. They're like children fighting; someone has to be the responsible adult and break up the fight. If they can't see that they are fighting like little children, then someone has to prove it to them and make it stop. We can't have the world falling to pieces because the "UK" is afraid of stopping it.)
(^?^)?(^?^)

Shelley Garland #sexist huffingtonpost.co.za

[Note: I initially assumed this to be satire, until I saw a follow up piece from the Huffington Post which indicated that this was quite serious.]

Some of the biggest blows to the progressive cause in the past year have often been due to the votes of white men. If white men were not allowed to vote, it is unlikely that the United Kingdom would be leaving the European Union, it is unlikely that Donald Trump would now be the President of the United States, and it is unlikely that the Democratic Alliance would now be governing four of South Africa's biggest cities.

If white men no longer had the vote, the progressive cause would be strengthened. It would not be necessary to deny white men indefinitely – the denial of the vote to white men for 20 years (just less than a generation) would go some way to seeing a decline in the influence of reactionary and neo-liberal ideology in the world. The influence of reckless white males were one of the primary reasons that led to the Great Recession which began in 2008. This would also strike a blow against toxic white masculinity, one that is long needed.

At the same time, a denial of the franchise to white men, could see a redistribution of global assets to their rightful owners. After all, white men have used the imposition of Western legal systems around the world to reinforce modern capitalism. A period of twenty years without white men in the world's parliaments and voting booths will allow legislation to be passed which could see the world's wealth far more equitably shared. The violence of white male wealth and income inequality will be a thing of the past.

This redistribution of the world's wealth is long overdue, and it is not just South Africa where white males own a disproportionate amount of wealth. While in South Africa 90 percent of the country's land is in the hands of whites (it is safe to assume these are mainly men), along with 97 percent of the Johannesburg Stock Exchange, this is also the norm in the rest of the world. Namibia has similar statistics with regard to land distribution and one can assume this holds for other assets too. As Oxfam notes eight men control as much as wealth as the poorest 50 percent of the world's population. In the United States ten percent of the population (nearly all white) own 90 percent of all assets – it is likely that these assets are largely in the hands of males. Although statistics by race are difficult to find from other parts of the world, it is very likely that the majority of the world's assets are in the hands of white males, despite them making up less than 10 percent of the world's population.

It is obvious that this violent status quo will not change without a struggle, and the only way to do so will be through the expropriation of these various assets and equitably distribute them to those who need them. This will not only make the world a more equitable place, but will also go some way to paying the debt that white males owe the world. Over the past 500 years colonialism, slavery, and various aggressive wars and genocides, have been due to the actions of white men. Redistributing some of their assets will go some way to paying the historical debt that they owe society.

It is no surprise that liberalism – and its ideological offshoots of conservatism and libertarianism – are the most popular ideologies among white males. These ideologies with their focus on individuals and individual responsibility, rather than group affiliation, allow white men to ignore the debt that they owe society, and from acknowledging that most of their assets, wealth, and privilege are the result of theft and violence.

Some may argue that this is unfair. Let's be clear, it may be unfair, but a moratorium on the franchise for white males for a period of between 20 and 30 years is a small price to pay for the pain inflicted by white males on others, particularly those with black, female-identifying bodies. In addition, white men should not be stripped of their other rights, and this withholding of the franchise should only be a temporary measure, as the world rights the wrongs of the past.

A withholding of the franchise from white males, along with the passing of legislation in this period to redistribute some of their assets, will also, to a degree, act as the reparations for slavery, colonialism, and apartheid, which the world is crying out for to be paid.

As we saw after the recent altercation between a white man and Lebohang Mabuya at a Spur restaurant in Johannesburg, white males still believe that they are in control, and people who aren't white or male (in particularly black female-identifying people) have to bow to their every whim. There are numerous other examples of white angry male violence in South Africa and abroad, often against black bodies (Dylann Roof's terrorist actions in the United States is only one of many examples). It is time to wrestle control of the world back from white males, and the first step will be a temporary restriction of the franchise to them.

Although this may seem unfair and unjust, allowing white males to continue to call the shots politically and economically, following their actions over the past 500 years, is the greater injustice.

Administrative_Worth & ActiveShitter #sexist reddit.com

Re: Why don’t we talk about the lesbianpill more?

(Administrative_Worth)

100% straight girls would rather lick each other’s flaps than LOOK at a sub 5 male. Almost every single girl above the age of 16 has had a lesbian experience but NONE of them have sub 5 experiences. Let that sink in.

Women's sexuality has developed as much more fluid than mens due to evolutionary purposes. It's already established that ancient caveman/ early agriculture chad had a harem of women. It was in their interest to get along. To share sexually. A "strong" woman demanding she be the only one and accepting nothing else. She wouldn't get the superior genes to breed with.

Anthropologists have actually documented this. Almost all women are bisexual to a degree, and it's believed it was an evolutionary strength as it produced more cohesive harems for chad and thus more likely to mate with chad and produce offspring.

if a foid thinks you're a chad, she will legit do A LOT to keep you interested. She'll kiss another foid and think it's hot, partly because she's doing it for chad, and her sexuality is fluid enough to enjoy it. She will do anal, she'll drop to her knees and suck him off. The kind of sex most normies only dream about, as they plug their 5/10 girlfriend who is giving them starfish non interactive sex for like 8 minutes. Foids will do groupsex, and if the mans hot enough, the arousal will drive them to seek his attention and seek satisfaction which can involve her playing with the other foids.

There's a world of difference between chad and normies. ironically there isn't as big a difference between incels and normies. Most normies aren't getting much. Maybe a top tier normie might, but that's it, that's where the exponential curve begins, at top tier

(ActiveShitter)
This is one of the basics of biology. Women are not sexually attracted to males, only romantically. Studies show that even the most 100% straight women will find the naked female body more sensual and arousing than the naked male body. And they will still assert that they are 100% straight simply because they don't consider sex important. For women sex is just the price they're willing to pay for a relationship with men, which is what they really want. And since they want a relationship (i.e. just romance and kissing) only with men then they consider themselves completely straight despite preferring to lick vagina lips than let a penis inside them.

NotForMe1 #sexist #psycho incels.co

We should use "femcels" to fight our war against all the holes.

Look up the femcel sub. They all pretty much hate Stacies and even solid Beckies.

Now what would happen if we spread the femcel movement just like we did with the incel one? It has potential to spread even further because women are more fragile ans desperate on average than men.

What happens next? There would be a war with sub 7 foids against Stacies and upper Beckies.

We would divide their entire gender. You know how it goes boys, divide then conquer.

What should we do? Spread the body shaming. Shame every woman for being sub 9.

Make forums with angry females (at first it would be our fakecel accounts).

Spread the ultimate blackpill for women, that is, make them believe no man will ever be truly happy with sub 9. Make them think men cheat as much as they can, when possible. Make them think a man at least once in life pays a top looking hooker.

Make them believe a man must fantasize about Stacy in order to fuck a "femcel".

Lets make this war happen, boys.

BabyFuck McGirlsex #sexist #crackpot #dunning-kruger incels.co

[JFL] "Female Orgasm" is the reason why you're an incel

By Professor B. McGirlsex, PhD in INCELDOM (Cambridge, UK), M.B.B.S (Kings College, London, UK), BSc (Hons) (APNP)

The female orgasm is the most useless thing on the face of this earth - there is no reason for it to even exist.

* No reproductive function
* No anatomical function

Female orgasm is an evolutionary quirk and is just as useless as

* male nipples
* The appendix
* The tooth fairy
* Females in scientific fields

Foids want to LARP as men, the gender who can have an orgasm every single time they fuck.

Men can fuck a foid, fuck a fleshlight, fuck a mouth, fuck a palm(handjob) e.t.c and they cum every single time!

Meanwhile a foid can have sex for 10 years but not experience even a single orgasm. If nature wanted foids to cum it'll have made it easy for foids to orgasm - but no, its extremely difficult or even impossible for foids to reach "orgasm".

* Scientifically speaking - the only sure way for foids to orgasm is by getting brutally and savagely raped

Fuck these foid cunts - when they cant orgasm they blame men yet its their flawed biology to blame + they shouldnt be cuming in the first place!

Why the mythical non-existant foid orgasm is the reason why you are rotting in Inceldom

* The reason why foids forsake their biological imperative of mating with their looksmatch is because they chase useless things like "foid orgasm". In their warped minds goodlooking = chad = good sex = foid orgasm & ugly = incel = bad sex = no orgasm
* Countless studies and experiments and also a huge wealth of anecdotal evidence have shown that foids are ruthlessly selfish and self serving animals and only care about their pleasures - which is why they dont care that they are perpetuating inceldom at an ungodly rate and would rather chase after "orgasms" than settle for their looksmatch
* The Dogpill exists purely becase of the foids unnecessary need for orgasm. Thats why they choose a canine animal with a grotesque dick to fuck because it takes a lot to get a foid to orgasm. Dogpill almost accurately mimics and simulates rape which is why foids love the dog pill so much. The wild uncoordinated primal thrusts of a dog penis closely resembles those of a rapist thats why the dogpill is soooo appealing. In this futile search for orgasm foids bypass and over look a large number of males who inturn become incels.
* The cock carousel is very appealing to foids because they are forever chasing the elusive foid orgasm. They waste their youth and virginity whilst chasing muh orgasms and they disenfranchise their looksmatchs whilst in this trivial pursuit. These disenfranchised men become incels.

BrazilianSigmasDad #sexist #dunning-kruger incels.co

[Based] Reminder: If you want to destroy civilization just give women rights

Women have contributed NOTHING of value to any society across the world. Pretty much every invention was made by men. Almost every road you drive on and building you go in was constructed by men. Men vastly outnumber women in STEM, why? Because women are too fucking dumb for that :feelskek: All foids know what to do is post bikini pics on instagram, watch netflix, text chad. and make fun of short , ugly, or ethnic men. Foids do not think at all. Men have a desire to better the world, foids have a desire to better only themselves. Everything must be about them. They dress like fucking whores and sluts (for attention), cry sexual harassment when approached by an ugly male ( for attention), and then go onto to be fake depressed when they don't get their way (for attention). The only value women have are those between the ages of 18-25 with the ability to reproduce. After the age of 25 when roasties hit the wall they look like shit. Their roast beef flaps start hanging out and they start smelling like tuna, not to mention thats when pretty much all women start becoming landwhales. Women know they are useless. They do not push society forward, they push it backwards. Giving women rights is what destroyed the west, now as the rest of the world adopts western feminism, welp, its game over for humanity. Society is about to enter a new dark age thanks to women

KingOfRome #racist incels.co

The Western World died in 1945

JFL at coping stormcels who think the prevailing culture in the west isn't western culture. Your ethnostate is a pipe dream. Your pathetic race will be bred out of existence within the next six generations, and it's ridiculous for you to care as genetic waste who can't even find a foid of your race to reproduce with or even date. The western world ended on May 8, 1945, when the National Socialist government formally surrendered to the Allied powers. That was the death knell of the last glimmer of hope for western civilization. It's all barbarism from here, folks. You might as well give up all cope and fall into the freezing embrace of nihilistic abandon.

And don't you ethniccels pretend you wouldn't have been happier if the Third Reich won World War Two. Because your peoples wouldn't have migrated to western countries to be used as cheap labor for the Jewish capitalists, your foids wouldn't have all these white men to pine over while you rot.

Representative-Way39 #sexist #crackpot #dunning-kruger i.redd.it

Advice to foids on how to take care of their vagina because they’re too dumb to figure it out on their own therefore require men to teach them

modern vaginas are just as repulsive as their bearers.. all historically depicted pussies are neat and tucked, they didn't have massive dildos or have sex with countless men. and no pedo but young prepubescent girls have roast beef, this shit only happens after they start jamming shit up there.

GIRLS when you put your tampons in do it delicately, too many of you pull the vagina to the side too roughly, OF COURSE doing that is going to cause the flaps to become worn and become loose and dangle. you fucking stupid repulsive cunts, god damn yous are so stupid, you can't even handle taking care of your vagina without men having to tell you what to do. fucking idiots.