Similar posts

CH #fundie heartiste.wordpress.com

The gaydar AI algorithm would peg this face [picture of Mary Wollstonecraft] as a rugmuncher mug.

Wollstonecraft married, but in the 18th Century it would have been common for lesbians and gays to marry into heterosexual relationships.

The origin of modern feminism — the particularly nasty and virulent form of feminism that seeks to invert the sexual market to the perceived benefit of ugly women by removing all constraints on female sexuality and stripping moral agency from women, while maximally restricting and pathologizing male sexuality and burdening men with all moral responsibility — was disproportionately a Jewish and ugly woman movement. The book that begat modern feminism was The Feminine Mystique, by Jewish woman Betty Friedan.

What followed in Friedan’s wake was a freak parade of uglier and uglier women fronting the modern feminist agenda, and enacting their warped vision of the sexes into policy (e.g. Title IX).

Steve Sailer argues feminism is a WASP concept, and 20th Century Jewish immigration and dominance in media and Hollywood actually delayed the triumph of feminism (seen in the WASPs passing Female Suffrage and Prohibition), because Jewish men, like all Semitic men, evolved in a patriarchal and ethnocentric culture and didn’t see a need to extend respect to shiksas.

Maybe proto-feminism is WASPy, but that doesn’t explain the Jewishness of modern feminism, unless one considers Jewish feminism an ethnic-scale case of intratribal negative transference. Jewish female feminists were rebelling against their patriarchal religion (and seething with resentment against their Jewish men lusting after pretty Gentile women), but as is the wont of their tribe they organized their resistance around defiance of the Gentile soft-patriarchy culture of comfortably accepted sex roles and sex-based preferences, instead of targeting their attacks against their own Swinesteins. They transferred the cause of their bad feelings onto the contemptible goyium.

Jewish-led feminism was actually a reaction to their own anti-feminist ethnic culture. But since Jewish men, like all men, are more interested than are women in acquiring status and power to exchange for sex, the heights of industries like Hollywood filled with patriarchal Jewish men instead of feminist Jewish women.

That’s not the end of the story. Jewish men eventually caught on that hypocritically espousing the radical feminism of their tribeswomen was a great stick with which to beat goy society and poison relations between Gentile men and their women….and also to fool naive feminists into bed using the “Hugo Schwyzer” male feminist ruse. If you’re a casting couch sleazebag running a de facto brothel for skanky actress wannabes, posturing like a champion of women’s lib is an effective way to keep the heat off you and your whores satisfied with a pittance of hush money and empty promises.

When one sees feminism, and especially modern feminism, through the lens of homosexuality, ugliness, and Jewishness, the tenets and demands of the twisted ideology begin to make sense.

Lesbians resent men. They love feminism because they want to be men in every way that matters, and that means they have a stake in undermining sex-differentiated norms and even sexual dichotomy.

Lesbian Feminism is the agenda of making unfeminine women into second rate men rather than first rate women.

Ugly women resent pretty women. They love feminism because they want to reduce the competitive advantages pretty women enjoy by enforcing equality and uniformity among women. Ugly women also love feminism because they understand on a deep level that they are too ugly to find a provider husband and must pursue careerism to collect the resources themselves.

Ugly Woman Feminism is the agenda of pitting the bottom quarter of women against the top three quarters of women.

Jewish women resent their patriarchal culture and Gentile social norms. They love feminism because it subverts the traditions of their ethnic religion and gives them cover to corrupt the benignly sex-differentiated Christian culture which largely rejects the radical value system of Jewish women.

Jewish Feminism is the agenda of delegitimizing patriarchal Judaism/Semitism and of poisoning the benevolent sexism of Christian Gentile culture.

Put those three origins of modern (and proto-) feminism together — the lesbian, the ugly, and the Jewish — into one monstrous frankenshrew, and you get intersectional insanity like “white male privilege”, the UVA rape hoax scandal, and the constant invocation of the mythological discriminatory “wage gap“. Not to mention the gross anti-male injustice known as the family court industrial complex.

PS Even WASP feminism is tainted in origin. Prohibition was a failure, and Female Suffrage has inarguably shifted America politically leftward and into the waiting petri dish of Poz.

mad wax sturd wax mad blurg #conspiracy youtube.com

TOM WYLIE RAVE A TURD SHIT BAG FACE BEAT YO BALLS ALOT HARDER JAMES HARDER MAKE EM SNAP OFF FOR BOB JENNER AND BOWIES GONE ! YO SHOULD GET A SHOVEL AND GO TOO BERLIN BUNKER BABYLON LIBENSBORNE VALKERIE WEDDING TRANNY GAY SABBAT JUDEN BERLIN LICENSE STAPO @@ BOZO BUSH OBAMA MERKEL DOO!! FULL ON FONZO BONZO BRAIN CHIP ANUS BROWN MOSES SLING TURDS! CANDLE STICK PARK FIVE FIFTY LOWER BEATLE TICKET SCALPER ! DAVID HULL HULLABALLOER K.R.L.A. LOS ANGELES THE FIFTH BEATLE! LIQUID STAR MOON DOG THORS HAMMER LIGHTENING TRACTOR Big Bopper Buddy Bolly Elvis Presley COUNTY JOE THE FISH RUSSIAN ROCK GROUP VAN DER
GRAPH GENERATOR TWI LIGHT ZONE MANNEQUINN U.F.O. U.T.F.O. POCO PINBALL ! DONT SAY POKEMON TICKETRON SPACE CADET DOT DOT DOT ! NAKED LADIES CANOE GUIDE LIBERTY SACKAJAWEAH DOLLAR! SOMETIME IN NEW YORK CITY ! BANTAM THE PHANTOM RAY BRADBURY FLIPPED A VISCIOUS ROSWELL ON BLISH STAR TREK ANTARTICA ATLANTIS JOHN BOYD THE RAKEHILLS OF HEAVEN VIMANA CHARIOTS OF THE GODS ORSON WELLS W.O.T.W. THE WHISTLER ! WAR LOCK 66 E TICKET SHOCK MACHINE ARCADE W.D. LASERIUM LOGANS RUN DARK STAR SECRET SAUCERS ROGERS WATERS HORTON HANEBU VRIL THULIAN
BERGESTGARTEN ALES AND ILLS DORIS AND THE DEFADES ! DO YA VOMIT WHEN I SAY JOE BUSH BERLIN BUNKER GORING OR GOOEBELLS PAPER CLIP WAFFER DRONES NASA NAZIS OR A.V.C. COLLEGE BILLY GATES I STOLE THE V ! WORE THAT ON MY HELMUT WITH A KAPO ENSIGNIA FOR FUN MARTIN SKUNKWORKS NORTHROP ROCKWELL AEROSPACE !

THEY CALLED THE POLICE ON ME !

NOT STING OR FOR ANY IRON BUTTERFLY ! RAN ME NATIONAL WANTED ME PUT AWAY FOR EASY RIDER AND FOR VON BRAUN PEENAMUNDE V1 DRONE EXPOSER SOME SONNY BARGER WORDS H.A. @!@ OR EDWARD SNOWDEN MOSCOW SQUARE ! JOE STALIN GARGOYLE ROAD UKRAINE A PUSSY RIOT & Led THE DREADED Zepplin ! CANT PUT A GUNNEY FEDERAL IN JAIL THAT CAN KICK YO UNARMED ALONE CAUGHT CONUS OR NON CONUS ASS ! I BROKE THE WARDENS LOCK and key in lancaster bob dylan for opey and arlo any jamboree pile of trash ! THEN SAID I WAS NEVER IN JAIL BILLY GATES SOME U.S.C PIN YOU HAVE YO COONS IN BADGES JERRY BROWN BUNCHA S.W.A.T. DETECTIVE CREEPS !

FIRST TIME I SAW DAVID ICKY HERMAN MUNSTER BOLT NECK ITCH TRANNY I CALLED ALEX JONES ITS BUTT BUDDY BOB JENNER THE SAME SHITS TOGETHER TOLD THE FOOL SAY BERLIN BUNKER REMOTE WAFFER DRONES ON INFO WAR ON WORDS ! THE FAT BITCH WENT TOO DINNER WITH JOE BUSH MEADOW MUFFIN MAN INSTEAD TO EAT MOUNTAIN OYSTERS PIG NUTS !@@ THEY EAT MAN NUTS CUM ALSO! IEKE DOES ONLY LOW SCUMBAG RE SEARCH PIN OH KEY OH STUCK ! ALSO LOW I.Q. FUCKER OVER CHURCHED UP TORTURE MEMOS PREACHER !

ITALSISTA MADONNA ISLA BITCH LITA WANTS COCK GOT THE TITS WANT EM SUCKED AND CLEAN AND MUFF DIVER DRONE WAFFER BERLIN BUNKER SHIT ASS ! REALISE A UNIC WITH ANUS FOR BRAIN YOU ARE JEW BOY KIKE ICKE TRASH ROBIN ON A COCK cant spell nigger only MARY TRANNY WHITE NIGGER SHIT ASS TORTURE MEMO CHURCH ! BAG YO HAG PASTOR SHIT ASS KNOWS YO ANY GOD DAMN SHIT HEAD SKANK WITH YO LOW JOE BUSHES I.Q. BIBLICKED UP THE KUNT BITCH CALL YA MOMMA IS A MAN WITH STINK HOLE BUILT IN ! YO IS A BOHEEMIAN GROVE NEED A DYKE HAD YO SKANKY AND STINK BUTTHOLE HYMEN SHEERED OFF THE DICK AND BALLS TWI LIGHT ZONE MOTHER FUCKER PIECE OF JACKS SHIT ! With The David icky pigmy niggers suck ya own W.T.F. Buttholes YO Biblick ass babylon dated old unic ! BOWIE TOOK GAY AND PEDO TOO TRANNY AND FREY THE LIMIT ONE MORE TIME! AND IN THE CORNER HAVE YOU SEEN THAT GIRL IN THROUGH THEE OUT DOOR ?

AND I CUT YA DICK AND BANGKOK BALLS OFF TOO BABYLON DATED TOO MISSIONARY TRANVISTITE AND THAT CUNT LABIA WACKER OFF MADONNA ON YA KABALA ASsS PROVE IT ! CANT WACK OBAMA OFF ALREADY DONME THE FAKE NIGGER! And bill gates is a white god damn nigger boheeemian grove basturd and melinda gates another mark zuckerberg red god damn nigger the same in bed niggers and i got this off the media from ted turners niggers ! and all those intel anal jackyls shitters and pimps and hoes knows they the butthole suckers !

YA GET MAD AT HINDENBERG SHIT ASS ? CAN YOU STAND UP SWAN REPRISE AND JULES VERN AQUALUNG BRANDENBERG 1971 TO 41 WIFFEN WAFFER DRONES 1969 REAM Field Dean Jones Game Boy TOMMY! FLEET WOOD MICK EDWARD EARLS COURT ISLE OF WHITE MACK! SCRATCH A CAT WITH FEVER MC VICAR >? YOU GONNA FUCKTARD BUTTHOLE HYMEN ONLY TRANNY BRAIN FART ? Hey more than bad finger ass rated YOU CAN SIGN MY JACK COUSTEAU BOOK! YOUR SO SHALLOW! QUADROPHENIA OPERATOR THERES SOMTHIN IN MY EYES IT HAPPENS EVERY TIME ! I SAID OLD MAN LEAR CAN YA READ MY BOOK ABOUT A DIRTY STORY AND THE DAILY MAIL

PAPER BACK ROUTER !PAPERBACK RIDER
AND I'M GONNA BE A PAPER BACK WRITER !
PAPER BACK RIDER PAPER BACK RIDER
PAPER BACK RIDER
PAPER BACK RIDER !
paper back writer!

Anonymous #sexist archiveofsins.com

I think feminism was never as hated as it is today, gotta ask yourself why. since feminists are usually egocentric as fuck, they won't realize it's a problem in the movement (i.e. using very vocal crazy womyn), that ends in hate from literally every group.
>men hate feminists
>GBT hates feminism
>probably even lesbians hate feminism
>black people hate feminism
>spics hate them
>asians hate feminism
>plenty, actually a shit-ton, of straight women hate feminism
I really don't know any group in society, that doesn't have a respectable amount of people, who hate modern feminism.
no, it's not because we feel threatened, it's because you talk shit and put shame to a theoretically valid movement.

David J. Stewart #fundie jesus-is-savior.com

The homosexual community are infested with masculine females and effeminate males.

This very fact evidences that homosexuality is against nature. When two lesbians cohabit, one always assumes the male dominant role. Masculine lesbians are called “dykes” or a “butch.” Likewise, the same is true for two homosexual men, but in this case, one male takes on a female role (thus becoming effeminate). This sick reality proves that no one is born “that way.” In any homosexual relationship, one partner will always assume the male role and the other a female role.

The reason why homosexual men often grow large mustaches is to simulate the female's sex organ during oral sex with another man. That's the gross and harsh reality of homosexuality. Nature itself teaches that homosexuality is a sick, bizarre, abnormal, demented, Godless form of perversion. God hates all sin, including homosexuality.

The lowest point that any society can deteriorate to is a homosexual culture. Most Americans don't realize the extent to which America has sunk low in wickedness. Parents are paranoid nationwide about sex-perverts raping their children. There is an irrefutable connection between open sexual immorality, homosexuality and pedophile. Sexual immorality always preys upon innocence. Pedophilia is the natural trend of homosexuality, because it is perversion. One perversion invites another.

mental_out #sexist incels.co

Why we can't let them destroy the incel label

Honestly this is a factor I genuinely believe is important to point out. I've noticed a lot of people will say things like "if you're not violent/a paedophile/rapist then you shouldn't call yourself an incel". What this is is a very deliberate attempt to atomise unattractive and cast out men from each other so that they cannot challenge the status quo and can be easily manipulated into being what society (and more specifically, women) wants them to be.

This is exactly what they did to the mens rights activist movement. The MRA movement originally aimed to point out how feminism had been totally ignoring and glossing the various issues that affected men, such as how women are allowed to physically attack men and how this isn't taken seriously by the law, how marriage laws unfairly benefit women, how men actually make up the majority of work related deaths, the majority of suicides, the majority of murders etc etc. Feminism ignored these issues almost entirely, mostly because they were advantageous to women, it benefited women to have men do all the dying at work, how men were expected to throw money at women, and it challenged womens victimhood to point all of these factors out, which of course didn't go down well with the feminists who's entire claim to special political treatment was based around their exclusive victimhood. So as I'm sure you know they destroyed the MRAs by poisoning the label. They declared them misogynists and harassed them into extinction, making sure that men who wanted to deal with these issues would be atomised and unable to rally around a single banner, and thus making them ineffective.

It seems that they're trying to do much the same with the term incel by trying to make it a term referring to rapists and paedophiles, changing it from it's original meaning so as to poison it in a similar way and atomise men who suffer as a result of societies over the top expectations of men. They want to make sure that there's no community for such men, or at least no community that isn't under the watchful hawk like eyes of feminism to squash any real discussion on this matter. They want to keep incels from each other, forcing them into isolation where they will either die in silence or be molded into the perfect little worker robots to be used and abused. After all they refer to incels are "surplus males", essentially seen as nothing more than manufactured tools to be used by them.

This is why it's important to have a label, it's pretty much the only way to keep feminism from being able to control and manipulate men who were cast out of society, since as individuals you don't stand a chance against the leftwing monolith.

Lookismisreal #sexist incellife

Western civilization has already succumbed to the filth that is feminism, and I dare say that the rest of the world isn't far behind before it also gets completely engulfed by feminism. Religions like Christianity has lost its once strong essence in which has become extremely pussified as of late, however, one religion does stand tall against the tyranny of feminism; Islam. Islamic societies still function well without the interference of feminism and the degeneracy that comes with it; and due to such, is the last defense wall against feminism.

Here are some reasons why Islam/Islamic societies are better than degenerate feminized societies:

Islamic societies follow a strong patriarchal culture, while feminized western culture view patriarchy is equivalent to the oppression of femoids.

Islam grants men the role of leadership, while feminized societies consider it to be oppression.

Islam strongly encourages and recommends things like marriage for both men and femoids, while feminized societies is very critical of the institution of marriage because they are in the false notion that it leads to the subordination of femoids.

Islam not only seeks to support the family structure, but also to encourage the building and maintenance of families, while feminized societies seek to destroy the family structure due to their anti-family principals - since feminism view families as an expression of exploitative class relations.

Islam strive to preserve the tradition, while feminized societies strive to eliminate any kind of tradition it has by replacing it with a radically egalitarian system.

Islam shows that the primary role of a femoid is that of wife and mother, however, feminism absolutely detest traditional gender roles and calls upon them to be abolished in feminized societies.

Islam does not consider the fact the femoids would be better off if they had more choices, however, feminized societies consider the condition of femoids to be better if they have more choices.

Islam does not give femoids sexual license, while feminism calls for the societies that it concurs to give femoids sexual licence.

Islam places strict constraints on sexual behavior on both genders, especially femoids. However, feminism encourages and supports promiscuous behavior as a whole, and brainwashes impressionable femoids to follow a degenerate lifestyle from a very young age.
Islam does not support absolute equality or femoid superiority. However, in feminized societies the goal is absolute freedom with the case of femoid superiority.
And as you can see, Islam differs immensely with the feminist ideals and principles which feminized societies has built itself on. The degenerate western civilization is in the brink of approaching a time where men are no longer in charge and where femoids have more rights than men. Which is why, Islam needs to be spread among the world. However, if Islam falls, the world as we know will radically change to a point where men will be second class citizens - and then, the time of men as we all know it will be over.

Menace Clan #racist lyricsmania.com

[Lyrics to "Kill Whitey"]

Kill! (Kill!)
Whitey! (Whitey!)
All! (All!)
Mighty! (Mighty!)

God (God!)
Niggas in the church say (LAA)

Kill! (Kill!)
Whitey! (Whitey!)
All! (All!)
Mighty! (Mighty!)
God (God!)
Uncle tom house nigga (RAH!)

The white man is a devil, a beast, beserk, snake, Satan, serpent, evil, wicked, dragon, demonic, Hell-Born, Iblis, brutal, wild, fierce, untamed, the archenemy, father of lies, prince of darkness, nigga let me (?)
The Crips and Bloods are soldiers I'm recruitin'
Wit no dispute,
Drive by shootin' on this white genetic mutant,
Wanna know where I'm from?
I'm from "Fuck Yo Hood",
Dont even hit me up, fuck yo set
Let's go, and kill some rednecks (muthafucka)
The Menace Clan aint afraid, to check a hood
The Menace Clan aint afraid of a peckerwood
Fuck George Bush, fuck Bill Clinton, fuck Ross Perot, fuck Dan Quayle, what the hell?
Fuck Daryl Gates, fuck Stacey Koon, fuck Ted Briseno, fuck Lawrence Powell, fuck Timothy Wind, and judge George Carter,
Im down wit my nigga Shady,
I got the .380,
My homies think Im crazy cuz I shot a white baby, I said, I said, I said

Kill! (Kill!)
Whitey! (Whitey!)
All! (All!)
Mighty! (Mighty!)

God (God!)
Niggas in the church say (LAA)

Kill! (Kill!)
Whitey! (Whitey!)
All! (All!)
Mighty! (Mighty!)
God (God!)
Uncle tom house nigga (RAH!)

When I unload the muthafuckin Glock,
Ya body clot,
Ya homies are shot,
Im up the block before ya body drop,
A nigga dumpin' on yo white ass,
Fuck this rap shit, nigga I'ma blast,
I dont give a fuck, if,
None of yall niggas aint down,
I'll beat a white boy to the muthafucking ground,
Im wit tha M-E-N-A-C-E,
I could see you but ya cant see me,
Now what have we?
Im (?) you,
Just bust the one-less busta, musta,
Bit the dust,
Fuck this rap shit, nigga Im bust, on yo ass,
Ima slash and slash,
And they hear the sax,
You neva heard no shit like this,
Menace,
I piss on ya grave,
Civilize a slave,
Blow up ya church, then I blow up ya turf,
You will search,
For the Menace, Clan,
But in his, hand,
Theres a muthafuckin nine,
So they dont cross the line cuz I...

Kill! (Kill!)
Whitey! (Whitey!)
All! (All!)
Mighty! (Mighty!)

God (God!)
Niggas in the church say (LAA)

Kill! (Kill!)
Whitey! (Whitey!)
All! (All!)
Mighty! (Mighty!)
God (God!)
Uncle tom house nigga (RAH!)

David J. Stewart #fundie jesus-is-savior.com

NAMBLA are a siI believe in rights too, but NOT for homosexuals to promote their filth. No child should ever be taught that it's “normal” for two men or two women to have sex. It is sickening! The demonic feminist movement has generated millions of lesbians all across America! Feminism! Lesbianism! Abortion! Homosexuality! Demonic Rock-n-Roll music! Adulterous Country music! Legal prostitution! Drug abuse! Alcoholism! Gambling! Pornography! Divorce! Child abuse! How much more of this debauchery will God tolerate? The Family Research Institute provides statistics on the evils of homosexuality. Their website is being systematically banned because they tell the truth about homosexuality. Please read Violence and Homosexuality.

Homosexuality is almost as evil as it gets. The infamous Cheshire, Connecticut, rape and murders of a mother (Jennifer Hawke-Petit) and her two young daughters (Michaela, 11 and Hayley, 17) in 2007, were committed by two thug assailants who both later confessed to authorities of having been sexually abused by homosexuals as youth. Don't you dare tell me that homosexuality is harmless. Evil begets more evil. All homosexuals have pederast (desiring young boys) tendencies. That's why NAMBLA exists (North American Man-Boy Love Association), who are trying to lower the age of consent so that they can sodomize America's sons. Jeffrey Dahmer (16 murders) was a homosexual deviant, as was John Wayne Gacy (33 murders). All 49 known victims were boys and young men.

Parents, teach your children the signs of homosexual behavior and how to protect themselves if lured. I admire Russian President Vladimir Putin, who has signed laws protecting Russia's children from homosexual propaganda and has banned the adoption of children by queers! Amen for that!!! Where's Anita Bryant when we need her more than ever in 2015?

Comparing “civil rights” to “gay rights” is like comparing apples with oranges! The big difference is that everything about homosexuality is IMMORAL, UNNATURAL, and a THREAT to society. The fact that two like sexes CANNOT reproduce is solid evidence that homosexuality is VERY abnormal. No one is born gay, because God doesn't make mistakes. The FACT that two men, or two women, CANNOT bring forth a natural child is irrefutable evidence against them. The very idea of such reprobates of society adopting children is unthinkable. How is a growing child supposed to develop properly when they are missing either a father or a mother?

I would also like to point out a FACT that is purposely avoided by the Godless newsmedia. The Catholic church has been PLAGUED with child-molesting priests; BUT, what the media won't stress is that most of the offenders are homosexuals too! Homosexuality and pedophile are virtually INSEPARABLE! Regardless of what the American Psychiatric Institute or other “experts” may claim, the daily news reports that we keep hearing about are self-evident PROOF!

TheIncelPill #sexist reddit.com

Make no mistake about it. Despite ostensibly being pro-disability, pro-intersection, blah blah blah, it would be hard to construct a greater nightmare for the autistic Incel than feminism becoming mainstream. Because feminism isn't about actual misogyny: its about punishing men who don't follow their social standards.

Feminism doesn't give a shit about autists when they creepshot men "manspreading", as if he were physically imposing the patriarchy on her. If you can't sit still for shit and constantly change positions, you now risk committing sitcrime because a woman didn't ask you to change your wide, comfortable position.
Feminism doesn't give a shit about autists when they bitch about "mansplaining". So now, if you sperg on the details of your favorite hobby or what needs to be done at a job, you can earn the infinite ire of another irate female.

Feminism doesn't give a shit about autists when they invade our media; our video games, comic books, and anime, our only escapes from this cruel, neurotypical world, and normize/feminize it, ruining everything that made it good in the first place.
Feminism doesn't give a shit about autists when they label any man who doesn't understand social norms creepy. Don't believe me? Straight from the whorses mouth Being creep has never been, and never will be, about misogynists, bigots, or the dreaded "Nice Guys" (TM! TM! TM!) It is ENTIRELY about "not understanding subtle social signs". And women will treat this misunderstanding as actual misogyny.

You're not our alleys, feminists. You never were. And this is beyond you not fucking us. You treat men who don't understand social settings as worse than garbage. We have no respect for you, or women in general. You have no intention about making life easier for us. You are the exact reason why we don't enjoy going outside. Because the moment you commit a social error, everyone around you, from your friends, your employer, and especially women, will DESPISE you. The best thing feminism could do for autists is to stop doing EVERYTHING.

chudur-budur #sexist incels.co

[It's Over] Incel Trait: too depressed to wipe his ass after taking a shit (and reading these articles)

Is ass-wiping a major cope?
Yes Votes: 37 35.6%
No Votes: 67 64.4%

Just look at these articles:
1. “How do I tell my boyfriend he needs to wipe more?”
2. Real chads don't wipe their butt-holes.
3. It's so common that now feminists are labelling it as "septic masculinity"
4. They want us to make our butt-holes wiped.

Remember, the comments are from women complaining about their bfs/husbands.

After reading those articles, I am feeling very depressed.

I came to the realization that "ass wiping is a major cope".

A 9/10 blonde chad who never wipes his ass after taking shit with a turd riddled butt-hole surrounded by buzzing flies won't have any problem getting laid. Where a 5'2" 2/10 butt-ugly curry who thoroughly washes his butt-hole on the squirting hot-spring of the old faithful geyser at Yellowstone national park 10 times a day will never be able to get any shit.

JFL @ ass-wipercels.

Never began.

Anonymous #sexist desuarchive.org

>have 2 rich aunties
>neither of them have kids so they're pretty clueless
>one is lesbian with gambling and drug problem, let's call her #1, other one is some ex Stacy who is fucking weird as fuck and has mental issues and married some ugly old fat dude to get rich, let's call her #2
>Never see them because my mom hates them, mom starts talking to them both again when I'm about 9 yrs old
>#2 is trying to build a relationship with us so I get excited as shit for Christmas thinking she'll buy me a PS2 with some WWE games like I hinted at or a bike or something cool and expensive like that
>Christmas arrives oh hells yeah.jpg
>"here you go, anon :)"
>it's a fucking Winnie the Pooh toothbrush, toothpaste and some Enid Blyton books
>fucking scream and cry, she has a small mental breakdown and cries too
>go to #1's, her weird gf is there but it's okay because it probably means double presents as gf is desperate to be accepted into the family
>both of them are on 6 figure incomes so have the same expectations
>"merry Christmas anon, we hope you like it :)"
>...a plastic bag of shitty RAISIN cookies and a fucking yoyo
>autism tantrum episode, call them disgusting dykes and make my mom take me home
>she gets mad at them both since we're dirt poor and after a few more weeks they're not talking again
>last year, theyre talking again
>#2 doesn't buy me anything, but I'm okay with it because of the emotional meltdown
>#1 buys me a present
>...it's a fucking yoyo again and a copy of the Hunger Games

Fuck extended relatives who buy you kid's shit every Christmas. Fuck them.

Various #fundie answers.yahoo.com

[In response to a question about whether or not Christ's sacrifice was really a sacrifice...]

Get Gwaap: "yes and who are you to test the validity of christ?one who is founded in doubt will only find doubt"

jarjar dude: "u duscust me atheist who dont know if ur athiist and dont know get ur ******** nose out of christions bissness"

Wisdom: "I prefer not to argue but will give you this link to find answers to all your questions (link to Watchtower)"

no1home2day: "And you have the nerve and audacity to mock Him? I'm sorry, but when you stand on judgement day and God says, "Depart from me, into the hell prepared for satan and his followers!" I will feel no agony or pity over one such as yourself!" (this is a snippet from a very lengthy answer)

MoseShrute #sexist mumsnet.com

(This TERF means transwomen when she says "bepenised lesbians")

Why dont all the be penised lesbians just have sex with each other? That way everyone is happy.......no wait....they dont, because the bepenised lesbian deep down realises the other bepenised lesbian is actually a bloke....and they're not into blokes....much like actual lesbians arent

Junon #sexist islamicboard.com

Salaam

Another comment piece on the damage feminism has done to western society. Lessons to be learned.

Why Men (and Women) Hate Feminism

A while ago I received an e-mail from one of my female readers. She was being honest and polite, but wanted to know precisely what I had against feminism. It was along the lines of "feminism is about the equal treatment of women, so what is so bad about that?" However, like many other women, I don't believe she was fully aware as to just how far the feminist movement has gone, co-opting women and how far from the truth it is. Thus, I believe it would be to everybody's benefit to explain in detail why most readers here in the Capposphere and elsewhere are against feminism (and to see if I'm missing any other reasons).

Reason #1 - Myopic View of the Sexes

If there is a "primary" reason I would have to say this is it. Feminism started demanding changes in regards to women, with no consideration as to what would happen to the other half of society, ie - men. They also did not think it through and consider children as well. It was a very female-centered approach and nobody considered (let alone, cared) how actions/changes/etc. in women would affect the rest of society. You still see this today based on the policies advocated by feminism in that it is all about women. A secondary concern is given to the children (more often than not, using children as a means to extract government resources), and maybe a tertiary concern is given to men.

Reason #2 - Lies About Human Nature

A close second is the ludicrous concept that men and women are not just equal, but the same. Women can do what men can do. There are no biological differences. And any difference is viewed as sexism or oppression.

The problem is these differences are what makes men and women great. Men like women. Women like men. Men don't like manly women, and women don't like girly men. We enjoy the difference. All feminism has done is ruined the love lives of millions of other women (and men's as well) lying to youth about "being a sensitive 90's man"or a "strong independent woman." That men are "shallow" and "cheap" for liking long legs and big boobs, and that any man who is worth his weight in salt will "like you for you." Women now ignore these basic biological facts about male sexuality, even mocking and scorning them, and fail to attract men.

These lies about the "exact sameness" of men and women also destroy a vital component of our economy and society - the division of labor. Though nobody is ordained or condemned to play these roles, traditionally the wife would stay home, while the husband would work. This allowed for not only better families, but better reared children. It also allowed for happier people (as men are predisposed to go out and work and women are predisposed to stay at home and rear a family). Neither role was inferior to the other. Both were vital, but it was feminism that lied to millions of younger women telling them the grass was greener on the other side. The result has been an increase in divorce, less stable family, less financially stable families, and problem children incapable of becoming functioning adults in society. This has also resulted in women being less happy.

Reason #3 - False Claims of Sexism

The thoroughly debunked "wage gap" is getting mighty tiresome. It is a false argument used only to gain "victim" status by feminists to result in legislation that unfairly benefits women. Affirmative action is nothing more than discrimination against men. Most men resent this

Reason #4 - Not Pulling Your Weight

The wage gap, however, does prove something. Women, for all their clamor of independence and "what you can do I can do better" are failing miserably and only achieving about 76% of what men do. This in spite of all the handicaps of affirmative action, a media that is always supportive, and limitless educational and government programs. Of course, the wage gap is not 100% "proof women aren't pulling their own weight." Many women still take on traditional roles and rear children, some drop out of the work force to take care of their families. But when it comes to majoring in rigorous studies, producing things of economic value, and being economically-contributing members of society, they disproportionately fail. They account for more government workers than men, they account for easier subjects in college than men, and they are nowhere to be seen in dangerous or risky jobs. Women on the whole are NOT equal when it comes to economic production.

Reason #5 - Poor Stewardship of the Right to Vote

This is more of an opinion, but I believe it is an opinion held by the majority of men (and surprisingly, women) who hate feminism (so you may not agree the the political opinion, but it IS a reason some people hate feminism). In short, feminists have been poor stewards of their right to vote. I say this because they have consistently as a group voted for more government and less freedom since given the right to vote. I believe this is because it is in women's nature to be more caring than men, and thus tend to vote for "nicer" things. Children, health care, education, etc. However, "feelings" and "caring" have no place in government finances. That requires passionless thought and consideration, research, mathematics, and an understanding of history and economics. It also requires an appreciation for the freedom granted to us by our forefathers and an understanding of the role government was intended to play. Feminists have proven ignorant about these topics and vote with their hearts, not their heads (and more recently, just for plain politics).

Reason #6 - Replacing Men With the State

Closely related to #5 is that feminists and feminism advocates essentially replacing the husband and father with the state. This is abundantly clear when you see how much money and support single mothers get not to mention this macabre desire by some feminists to eliminate men from the birthing process altogether. Not only does this take away the two most important things in a man's live (his theoretical would-be wife and children), but essentially forces men to compete against the government as a much-better financed suitor. Not only do men lose out on love and family, any children brought into this world via Daddy Government are missing a real father and will suffer incredibly later in life.

Reasons #7 - Hypocrisy

While most hard core feminists will claim they're "independent," they're anything but. They are usually the first to have some kind of make-work government job, some kind of professorship nobody asked for, or begging and pleading for donations to some kind of "activist group." They typically produce nothing of value and require the state to transfer other people's money to create jobs for them. They even point out, point blank, they want more government money for them and/or their children in government policy. And while, yes, there may be that one feminist computer engineer, the vast majority of them are hopelessly dependent.

Reason #8 - Backlash for the Ruination of Women/Men/Lives

In general and summarizing some of the above, most people haven't sat down to think things through to the point they can articulate why the are so frustrated or angry with the opposite sex, let alone what role feminism played in this angst. But both sexes are painfully aware of the lower quality men and women of today. Modern day western women are on the whole unmarriageable, and modern day western men are no where near capable of being a provider or protector. As they ponder these things, however, they will start to realize just what a bunch of BS and lies they were fed in their youth. Lies about the sexes, the roles people were supposed to play, how the sexes were to interact with one another, and what people "should and should not like." As people age, they will see the best thing in their lives (namely, members of the opposite sex) ruined and spoiled, and consequentially the quality of their own lives ruined as well. Men now have to settle for women they're not attracted to, women have to settle for men who are effeminate and clueless, all because a bunch of women in the 1970's were miserable with their lives and (as far as I can tell) merely wanted everybody else to be miserable like them. When people put two and two together, they will see it was feminism that warped and thus ruined this aspect of their lives and they will get angry.

Those are the 8 primary reasons I could come up with. I think there may be more, but at minimum I hope it debunks feminism as simply being the "equal treatment of women" and clears up some things on both sides of the aisle.

kt0998 #sexist reddit.com

What is Black Pill Feminism?

Feminism for doomers.

Basic tenets of Black Pill Feminism:

- Biological realism. Male misogyny, sadism, violence and the need to subjugate and control women are caused by male biology. Female submissiveness and pickme-traits are caused by female biology. These generalizations apply to 99%+ of humanity. Patriarchy is the result of (biological) misogyny, not the origin of it.

- Feminism is a scam. Society's definition of equality is re-packaged male dominance. Feminism has been hijacked by anti-woman forces and was always doomed to succumb to the pickme-nature of most feminists. Feminism is anti-woman movement.

- We are heading towards misogynist dystopia. Hardcore porn, misogynist online communities, transgenderism, deep fakes, invasion of privacy, sexualization of children and the general rise of all things degenerate, fucked up and anti-woman. No matter how you look at it, women are fucked and things will keep getting worse and worse. Don't have kids.

NOT ALLOWED ON THIS SUB:

- Moids.

- Positivity. This is doomer only sub.

- "muh socialization" If biological determinism triggers you, this is not a sub for you. Pick another sub. Any sub. Literally EVERY feminist/leftist/liberal/marxist/whatever space promote biological denialism and blank slate ideology. We know socialization is real, but we reject it as the underlying/main cause.

- Promotion of any political movements or ideologies. Guess what, they are all anti-women.

- Trolling, MRA, pickme, coomer, SJW etc bullshit, spam, blah blah.

thegoddessisalesbiantoo #fundie thegoddessisalesbiantoo.tumblr.com

Legit every Goddess I’ve ever talked to except for one IDs as a lesbian and the one who doesn’t considered herself a lesbian until her ancient human lover’s soul got reincarnated in a male body. So yeah. Just saying.
Lilith is a lesbian. Ishtar is a lesbian. Bast is a lesbian. Aphrodite is a lesbian. The Queen of the Mountains is a lesbian. Cerridwen is a lesbian. The Dark Mother is a lesbian. The Goddess herself is a lesbian and mainstream paganism is still lesbophobic and I don’t get how.

David J. Stewart #fundie jesusisprecious.org

The only reason why the compromised Boy Scouts voted to allow churches to ban queer Scout Leaders is because most of the churches would have rightfully kicked the Boy Scouts out of their church! Tragically (and any spiritually discerning pastor fully realizes this), this is just a foot in the door for homosexuals in the Boy Scouts. Eventually, when the country has sunk even lower into sodomy and filth, they'll allow gays everywhere! The only BOY SCOUTS ladies and gentleman are the pederasts scouting for your sons to sodomize!!! PLEASE BAN THE BOY SCOUTS!!! They are a wicked organization that cater to agendas and have no fear of God. THEY HAVE NO TESTICLES!!! Is that what you want your sons to become... Cowardly yellow chickens like the Boy Scout organization???!!!

Do you know what really creeped me out this week. I knew that singer Barry Manilow was a lifelong atheist. I learned not too long ago that he's also been a homosexual since his youth. I had heard that he married his longtime friend and manager, another man! But what creeped me out was learning that Barry Manilow is the female in their same-sex union! There's pictures online of Barry dressed in drag. It's sick. Perhaps you didn't know this, but one homosexual always assumes the role of the male and the other the female. One takes a dominant role, and the other submissive. This is true of lesbians and sodomites! In the case of two lesbians, one will assume the masculine male role, which is what Rachel Maddow is—a dyke! This is why it is sometimes difficult to tell if someone is a homosexual, because a man who assumes the male role in the same-sex union will still appear manly, like Rock Hutson, George H. Bush and Ronald Reagan. The Bible teaches that homosexuals and the righteous will never co-exist in harmony. Proverbs 29:27, “An unjust man is an abomination to the just: and he that is upright in the way is abomination to the wicked.”

The liberals, queers and kooks condemn us fundamental Christians as “hate-mongers” for agreeing with God that homosexuality is a sin, abnormal and vile (Romans 1:24-32). I'm not condemning anyone, the Holy Bible condemn all of us as woeful sinners (Romans 3:23)!!! I'm upset and angry that homosexuals are forcing their sick perversion on America's children!!! GAY IS NOT OK! The King James Bible, which is the inspired Word of God, condemns and forbids the sin of homosexuality. Taylor Swift is doing her part to help the queer agenda, defiant against a holy God!!! We are hated here on earth by the wicked, but beloved of our heavenly Father, Oh Christians! Jesus is coming soon!

Gene and Earline Moody #fundie moodymanual.demonbuster.com

Goals of homosexuals are marriage to children, multiple spouse marriage, polygamy, group marriage, promiscuity (open marriage), same-sex marriage, and destryouing marriage between a man and a woman.

Forced homosexual roommates, gays in the military, radical feminism, lesbian separatist movement, anti-discrimination ordinances, minority status based on homosexuality, graphic pro-gay sex and AIDS education, mandatory sensitivity training, hate crimes, speech codes, fines, Hollywood promotion of homosexual love making and of gay rights agenda in movies and television, public finding of homosexual pornography; invention of gay speak - gay, homophobia, diversity, sexual orientation; unmasking of powerful homosexuals who masquerade as heterosexuals, homosexual marriage and adoption, attacks on churches, and pederasty.

nickyiil #sexist youtube.com

(Paragraph breaks added for ease of reading)

You people are insane ! literally insane. You spend the last thousand years aping the Romans, as you believed them to be, morphing your men into rage filled emotional cripples, then you bitch and moan.

Yes men have emotions other than rage but, a 1000+ years of conditioning prevents the majority of publicly expressing them.

After so many generations i would not be surprised if it is part of the male genetic code by now.

Women clearly do not choose the soft emotional type to reproduce with, so.. men fake it till they make it.

You chose that type of man for your society. Tf are you bitching?

Feminism.

if not for the moral busybodies that stick their noses in to my entertainment, i would not give a fuck about feminism and feminists.

I begun studying them out of intellectual curiosity, nothing more. After 30+years i probably know shit about feminism its origins and its masks that most feminist have forgotten, or were never told.

That and a genuine out rage at the unacceptable violation of the" All equal under the law" principle makes me one of their deadliest opponents.

Again idid not go out seeking battle i have better things to do than wasting time trying to convince a bunch of intellectual blind people of the obvious they refuse to see.

You cannot reason with religious zealots, it can not be done. Tried and failed ,several times, since that moron Akenaten tried to convert the priesthood of Egypt to montheists.

Religious zealots bow only to superior force. You think the Roman emperors enjoyed sending troops to settle religious rebellions?

They knew there was no other way.

Anyone convinced they are morally right 10% and there can be no opposing view can not be reasoned with. They will make life not worth living for the whole of their society eventually to match the mental picture they have that is ever shifting.

Wake the fuck up and smell the bullshit.

The grievance industry is undermining even the hard sciences now. the law has become a toy in their insane whims.

There never was another way. history proves the right and sanity of what i propose. You want your children to be born slaves to some insane cretins that keep changing their minds every time they move their heads?

Men's rights are human rights . Yeah right !Human rights that keep getting violated daily yet you still refuse to do what is needed to free yourselves.

You and creationist will be the death of my presence on line.

Soon i wil chose my personal peace of mind ,say screw it ,and .. delete this account.

You don't want to listen and i am getting frustrated of banging my head against a wall. Enjoy you mutilation at the hands of some unwashed fundie from bum fuck nowhere.

It wil happen. See you all after the collapse if you survive , maybe.

eric_otness #fundie gamefaqs.com

Dont these SJW know that normalizing pedophilia is whats next on the agenda? You might wanna go check Vox, CNN, and Huffington Post. How else are they going to learn to live with the muslims in Europe?

Anyway Marie could pass for under 18, its why everyone likes her, its why she is on the cover of the game, its why she was voted number 1. Why dont you go buy your worthless asses some plane tickets to the UK and protest in Rotherham if you give such a f*** about children and stop crying about a video game produced by the cleanest society on earth when you all live among the most vile.

I'm not sure I'd call Japan the cleanest society, especially when, in the case of the Pokémon Anime, they did definitely depict the female characters as sex objects even when they were canonically 10 years old, and besides which, Japan is actually one of the biggest distributers of child porn: http://www.conservapedia.com/Atheistic_Japan_and_child_pornography

However, you are right about one thing: legalizing child porn is next on the SJW's radar whether they know it or not

True pedophiles would, you know, be attracted to people who were literally underage, like, I don't know, those people who actually hit it on with May or Dawn or Serena from Pokémon (who are quite explicitly 10 years old). In fact, Masamitsu Hidaka would qualify as a pedophile since his interview made it VERY clear that he views the girls in Pokémon, all of whom are 10 or younger, as just being sexualized meat for the audience, and with May and Serena, it's extremely obvious due to their having massive breasts.

'all keep waving around MR's manufactured age as if that's proof of non-pedophilia. When at best, it's proof of law-abiding pedophilia.

You're attracted to a character who:
- Looks like a child
- Dresses like a child
- Sounds like a child
- Speaks like a child
- Acts like a child
Etc. The overwhelming number of people meeting these characteristics are children. In fact, these characteristics are what separate children from adults. You're attracted to the things that make children "children." That makes you a pedophile.


*However*, you slam on the brakes if the potential object of your attraction is under age. 14-year-old looking and acting like MR: No go. Exact same person with an earlier birthday: Full steam ahead. That proves you understand and respect the law. Which is really all we can ask of people.

My primary concern is if they are literally children, ie, even their age is indeed 10. I would consider those who hit it off to May, Dawn, Iris, Serena, heck, even Misty from the Pokémon Anime when they are explicitly 10 years old to be pedophiles, NOT those who crush on Marie Rose, who at least is 18 years of age.

At most, Marie Rose would qualify as a manchild, which still doesn't make those who crush on her pedophiles. It's like saying girls who crush on, say, Kefka Palazzo must automatically be pedophiles just because he acts like a child and speaks like a child (literally in this case, since in the Japanese version, he uses the pronoun "boku-chin" which is generally appropriate only for very young children). And bear in mind, Kefka's in his thirties, and it's extremely obvious in Dissidia Final Fantasy that he isn't even close to a child anyway (though since he is somewhat diminutive in Final Fantasy VI, he could look like a child in the latter game).

Henry Makow, PhD #wingnut #conspiracy #racist #homophobia #transphobia #sexist amazon.com

FEMINISM & HOMOSEXUALITY; HOW HETEROSEXUALITY WORKS Feminism, our official gender ideology, masquerades as a movement for woman's rights. In reality, feminism is a cruel hoax, telling women their natural biological instincts are "socially constructed" to oppress them. Feminism is elite social engineering designed to destroy gender identity by making women masculine and men feminine. Increasingly heterosexuals are conditioned to behave like homosexuals who generally don't marry and have children. Courtship and monogamy are being replaced by sexual promiscuity, prophesied in Aldous Huxley's Brave New World. Rockefeller and Rothschild created feminism to poison male-female relations (divide and conquer.) Their twin objectives are depopulation and totalitarian world government. Why? These bankers create money out of nothing and think they are God. "Cruel Hoax" shows the connection between feminism, Communism and 9-11. It examines male-female relations and shows how we can take back our heterosexuality.

Steve #conspiracy godlikeproductions.com

Sick of the wussie republicans who fail to stand up to the loser left wing guests on CNN.

Yes inauguration was the biggest ever.

Yes Trump has been spied on by the government - DUH - only all his appointments private phone calls have been made public.

And they should just tell the libs if they cant get that through their thick skulls then they can go fuck themselves because we don't give a flying shit about their loser-ass opinion.

Alex Campbell #conspiracy knowyourmeme.com

Why does the knee jerk reaction from everyone is to automaitically call any conspiracy theories bullshit?

Like shit is not like i dont get it and i accept that there is quite the amount of wacky and insane theories out there.

But before calling something bullshit/or real try and do some research and when it comes to this the US goverment has a pretty extensive track record of doing undercover bullshit that ends up (for lack of a better term) fucking you all in the ass.

You always and i repeat ALWAYS gotta be critical of your goverment regardless of what the media or themselves tell ya.

SPECIALLY if you happen to be American.

James #fundie forum.myspace.com

Truth be told, I blame all of Americas social ills on the feminist movement.

Gays: Feminism = women in the workplace = taking away the financial dependence on their husbands = divorce rate goes up = single moms = young boys learning how to be a man mainly from a womans influence.

School Shootings: Feminism = women in politics = emotion (rather than logic) based legislation = tougher gun laws = guns no longer being a mainstay in every home = children only being taught about guns through videogames, gang violence and murder in the news. ( also the top graph led to this from the end of single moms )

Domestic violence: (do I even have to explain this one? Perhaps, sigh.) Feminism = women in the workplace = women competing with men for dominance in all aspects of life = attempted removal of defined gender roles in society (yet still having the predisposition to gravitate toward those roles) = instinct to dominate and command butting heads with cultural softness and equality = male frustration with few outlets

Just try to come up with something that is socially wrong with Americans today that does not have a root in feminism.

H #fundie lesbianplusfeminist.wordpress.com

Well. Notwithstanding having plenty of things to say, I haven’t been posting on my blog because it seems pointless. There’s the choir that I can preach to, and then there are the permanent Stockholm Syndrome sufferers who will cling to men’s ideas and the societal structures men have built and call it individuality and “gender identity” and “agency” and anything else they can come up with to obfuscate their various levels of conformity, while asking men for “equality.” If they even admit that men are the problem.

But today, I read something by a young woman who has autism. She can’t read social situations, and men, young and old, have been repeatedly taking advantage of her, everything from creepy staring to rape. I’m feeling like my head is going to explode. “Equality” isn’t going to do a damned thing for her. What shall we do, liberals? More useless askivism? More blogs and websites and wikis about “geek feminism” and “queer feminism” and goddess-knows-what-other sub-feminisms/pseudo-feminisms, onto which men invariably descend with everything from glib dismissal to overt rape threats?

I decided that it’s better to spend my time thinking about what womyn can DO. Frankly, I think it’s about time we moved straight on to violence and destruction. Sudden violence and destruction. I know. It sounds bleak and ugly and dangerous. Well, things are already bleak and ugly and dangerous for womyn. How much worse could it be, really? If you spend enough time thinking about it, enough hours fuming in impotent rage, perhaps you’ll find that risking your life, oh, say, bombing a men’s prison starts to seem worth it, for the future if not for yourself. What else is there? Imagine this: what if nearly every woman on Earth killed a man in his sleep tonight? How nice could tomorrow be? Imagine taking the offensive for once. Playing defense isn’t working. All the damage control in the world doesn’t prevent damage. Personally, I really like taking long walks alone late at night. Ever think about how men destroy even the simplest pleasures in life? Tired of it yet? Tired enough? I am.

I’m not the least bit ashamed to admit that I support male genocide. But I know that any liberals who may be in the audience think that is very mean, and wonder: what about the “good men”? All seven of them, three of whom just haven’t been caught killing or abusing women or children yet. The answer is: collateral damage. And men agree with me.

Yes men, who will bomb an entire country to smithereens and murder thousands of non-combatants to smoke out a handful of terrorists, agree that human collateral damage is acceptable for a “good cause.” Men, who will pay other men to risk their lives rooting about in a huge hole in the ground to mine the metal, and dump toxic waste by-products in poor neighborhoods to keep their corporations producing your iCrap, are ok with human collateral damage. Men will risk exposing thousands to radiation and making whole cities uninhabitable for generations so that we can have electricity, even after witnessing the fallout of other nuclear meltdowns. Who cares about dozens of possible cases of leukemia and mutations in the local wildlife? Men think we need lights, dammit. Etc.

Goddess. Mentally ill man just showed up. Enough for now.

Fist In the Face Of Misandry #sexist promalecollective.wordpress.com

{Excerpts from the „Pro-Male manifesto“}

Feminism is a hate movement. It has always been such and there is no such thing as a valid feminism. Do not make excuses for that hate movement. All three waves of feminism are based on misandry and disinformation. There has to be zero compromise with that movement. No one expects Jews to compromise with the Nazis and no one expects black people to play nice with the KKK.

You can’t be pro-male and married. It is that simple. MGTOW tackles the controversies surrounding marriage from the narrow point-of-view of the man’s self-interest, but when a man marries, he is maintaining an anti-male institution. This action sells other men out and in turn harms the entire male collective, just for a bit of female validation. Furthermore, singles end up paying for the tax breaks that benefit married couples and fund the social services used by housewives.

platinumgoldstarlesbians #sexist platinumgoldstarlesbians.tumblr.com

(Just out of curiosity, why do you feel the need to differentiate between lesbians and gold star lesbians? Why does it make you so angry that women who have had sex with men have the same right as a "gold star" like you to identify as a lesbian? Is it a superiority thing? Do you think you're better than those women? I really want to know why you put so much energy into something as trivial as this. )

First of all, it is not a trivial thing. Maybe to you non gold stars but to most gold star lesbians it is not trivial. Gold Star lesbian means a lesbian who has never willingly slept with a man or boy. Where in the definition does it say that gold star lesbians think they are superior to other lesbians? Rape victims can be gold stars lesbians because it implies consensual sex not rape. The term gold star used to be a slur. “Lesbians” who had or are sleeping with men made fun of and insulted lesbians who have never and will never sleep with men willingly by saying something like this, “oh, so you have never slept with a man? So now what do you want? A gold star!?” So these lesbians eventually got sick of it and decided to reclaim the word for themselves thus the gold star lesbian. The “lesbians” and their supporters who made fun of them and future supporters who will hate the term and/or definition of the term or/and the actual gold star lesbians are forever pissed of and will do anything to silence us and make us look bad. I think it was never about the term, it was and is about the definition of the term because they are other offensive terms such as pillow princess and dyke and slut that no one is making a fuss over and even if they do people ignore it. I think these people who are antigold stars just can’t stand and comprehend how a woman has not and will not willingly have sex with men and they are pissed of because they and everyone expect every woman to sleep with a man at least once in her lifetime. I view antigold stars to be mysoginistic and homophobic. I care because it puts a really bad reputation on real lesbians. Gold star lesbians have face the same compulsory heterosexuality just like the “lesbians” who have slept with men. There is only one type of lesbian and it is a biological woman who is sexually, emotionally, romantically, and physically attracted to ONLY other biological women. By that definition lesbians don’t willingly have sex with men. Also, they are many ways to avoid having sex with men when you are faced with expectations to sleep with them unless you live in a country like Afghanistan where who are basically raped and force to do things. The only excuse that I hear of why a “lesbian” slept with a man willingly is because compulsorary heterosexuality but there excuse is not valid because gold star lesbians face the same challenges as they do. Actually they have more of a challenge and are at more of a risk because they have never and will never sleep with men willingly and society expects women to have sex with men. Gold Star lesbians are not “lucky” they are just following their lesbianism. These “lesbians” who have slept and/or are sleeping with men make lesbians a huge joke to the mayority, the straight people. Those “lesbians” reinforce the stereotype that lesbians can have sex with men willingly, it is just a phase, they will end up with men, they can be “turn”, etc. The word lesbian has been changed (not by the dictionary but by what people connote it to) to mean a woman who had sex with men but now has sex with women. I don’t even like to call myself lesbian because people especially the LGBTQ will assume that I have slept with men which is not true. So I call myself gold star lesbian and this clearly states that I have never and will never sleep with men. The term lesbian has been changed to be ambiguous meaning that it can mean anything even the bisexuals claim the word lesbians. The point is to distinguish the “lesbians” who had and/or have sex with men from the lesbians who has never and will never willingly sleep with a man. After all, who do you think a person who wants to learn about lesbians will take more seriously, a “lesbian” who has slept or/and is sleeping with men or a lesbian who has never and will never sleep with men? I care because you antigold star lesbians are silencing us and expect us to be viewed as manfuckers like every other “lesbian”. It is just a term and because antigold stars are making a huge fuss over it I assume you all are homophobic. Plus, why do the “lesbians” who have had sex with men get a voice while lesbians who never slept with men need to shut the fuck up by the antigold star lesbians? It is antigold stars who make a huge fuss about the term and put bullshit lies in our mouths such as we don’t let rape victims be gold stars (most gold stars would agree that they can be gold stars). We gold stars are just defending ourselves from your homophobic bullshit.

(Hi, so there are many issues with your argument:

1) I think it’s funny how you assumed that I am a “non gold star” lesbian just because I have a problem with your perspective. To use your language, I am in fact a “platinum gold star” lesbian. My current girlfriend was my first kiss :)

2) The term “gold star” lesbian is not a slur. The response “oh, so you have never slept with a man? So now what do you want? A gold star!?” probably came after your insufferable and needless bragging about never having been with a “biological male”, which by the way, is transphobic. I’m not surprised that you’re a terf. A sarcastic comeback is not the same as a slur. The term “dyke” is used when I’m being threatened from across the street by a group of men for holding my girlfriend’s hand. No one cares if I’m a gold star or not.

3) You assume IMMENSE amounts of privilege when talking about being a gold star lesbian. I come from a country where there was absolutely NO LGBT representation. On top of that, my family was very religious and conservative. Heterosexual sex wasn’t even discussed or represented without religious warnings and limitations, i.e. only when you’re married, etc. I have had feelings for women for as long as I could remember, but due to my young inability to comprehend what I was feeling, I continued to identify as straight. After all, I had no point of reference, so how could I identify as something I didn’t even know was an option? You don’t have to be in Afghanistan being murdered or raped to deal with compulsory heterosexuality. If I had remained in my country, I would have probably ended up in a casually arranged marriage courtesy of my parents, distant relatives, and family friends. I know for a fact that I would also have just accepted and went along with the marriage, as I would have wanted to please my family. It would have probably been a close childhood friend of mine and we could just continue to be best friends after the marriage, just with occasional sex thrown in. Would I have been enthusiastic about the sex? Maybe not, but since I would have had no point of reference, chances are that I would have just went along with it to please my husband. No big deal, right? Except that in this scenario, I’m gay and I just don’t know it.

P.S. this situation isn’t completely hypothetical, I know a few of my parents’ friends that had me lined up as an option for their sons.

What I’m trying to show you is that there is nuance to being a lesbian. Nothing is just black and white. A lesbian is a woman (cis or trans) that is attracted solely to women. Therefore, I am a lesbian, just as much as my girlfriend, @tinylesbian, who has been involved with men for means of safety and survival.

4) The differentiation of platinum/gold star lesbians vs lesbians who have been involved with men in the past creates a hierarchy and is not helpful nor conducive to a supportive lesbian community. Bragging about never having been with a “biological male” (still transphobic) should not be a point of pride as it insinuates that you are somehow more of a lesbian than women who have and honestly, it’s just unnecessary information. We don’t care. No one does.)

There are gold stars and platinum lesbians who disagree with the label and I know that but most of them that complain about the label are the ones who sleep or have slept with men. Personally, I don’t like the term because it implies something better but no one including the haters have tried to come up with a new neutral term. Transexuals can’t be lesbians because I follow science. I suppose I am a TERF but I don’t call myself that because I find it offensive. The term may not have been a slur but it obviously was used to offend the gold star lesbians. I do agree that Afghanistan is not the only place that you can get raped and murdered for being LGBTQ. Unfortunately, even the U.S. has problems with murder and rape. However, as a society you can get help if you are raped and the rapist will get punished if he or she is reported but unfortunately some countries don’t have that. I in fact am a platinum lesbian. Despite that I had tried to be straight and tried to like boys in my teenaged years but it didn’t work and never got a boyfriend or any fuckboys coming after me (probably because of my social issues). Plus, I just couldn’t bring myself to have sex with males because to me it felt like I was going to sleep with an animal. It just wasn’t for me and my extincts just said no. I also tried commiting suicide a couple of times. But just because I am a platinum lesbian doesnt means that I had an easy life and that I and other gold star and platinum lesbians should be ignored and silenced. Most of us gold star and platinum lesbians have not had an easy life and we didn’t go have sex with men to make it easier and plus it is not in our nature. I totally disagree that lesbianism is nuanced. If lesbianism is nuanced, what about straight people are they nuanced and not black and white? The lesbian community is a huge joke (at least the ones I have been to) and it is not because of gold star and platinum lesbians. It is because of “lesbians” and bisexuals who can’t shut the hell up about men whether how it was good or bad having sex with them, how to unlearn liking men, divorces, marriages, children with men, etc. I expected a community of lesbians who talked only about women and not a thing about men (relating to sexual or romantic). Plus, the hate and bullying towards and silencing of lesbians who have never slept with men by the antigold stars and antiplatinums is unbelievable. Sometimes they even ban you from the place if you have never slept with men. I don’t involve myself in the lesbian community or LGBTQ community anymore and only seek other gold star or platinum lesbians to date. You and only people with your mentality may not care about the term but why the hell do you and others think you have the right to tell us what we can and cannot call ourselves and judge us when they are many bisexuals who mislabel themselves as lesbians and make a joke out of us? One of the reasons why we are loud and vocal is because people like you want to silence us and most people don’t want to be silenced. Also, we want to be role models to young lesbians to show them that they don’t have to sleep with a men to make sure they are lesbians or to be proper lesbians. I will respect your opinions despite that I disagree with them and I hope you respect mine despite you disagreeing with me. And then we call it quits.

fschmidt #fundie eivindberge.blogspot.com

Feminism is definitely not a hate-movement against all sexuality. Feminism is a slut-power movement. The goal of sluts is to have sex with the most immoral men they can find. So sex between all women and immoral men is strongly supported by feminism. There are two reasons for the concept of female sex offenses. One is to give lip service to the idea of equality. The other is that sex between a woman and a man who isn't immoral is considered a crime by feminists. So sex with an underage male is a sex offense to feminists because this male hasn't yet had the chance to prove his immorality. Still, there is no question that female sex offenses get much lighter punishments than male sex offenses.

ToxicPersonality #sexist #psycho incels.co

Im going to touch female coworker

I will touch female coworker now when i go there in a few days. Ass and titties. This will satisfy me and i will press my cock against her ass. It will be very enjoyable for me

Nice larp greycel.

I have already "bumped" into her on "accident" a few times. Its a small space with many of us so its believable that i could have because people are bumping into each other all day basically. But this time i will grab her waist and touch her nice ass with my cock

Hello cucktear infiltrator

Typical Greycel post

This cunt is obviously a foid infiltrator. Every thread it posts on has some stupid and/or larping bullshit like this mods need to get their act together tbhngl

Its not my fault that you are low t and dont want to put ur dick against womens asses.

”He is saying he will sexually assault them.

OP, rub one for me.”

When did he say that? He said he was gonna partake in normal interactions that happen in work day.
I wouldn't advise it personally due to metoo, I don't even meet with foids alone, unless they are western foids, because a noodle might not just metoo me for being ethnic, she might even have me organ harvested

If you look it up there was only like 2k lawsuits for workplace sexual harassment but lkke 5million was touched

They would lynch you if you were accused of fiddling a noodlewhore. Stay safe dude. The way OP wrote it seems as if he is going to be against her will.

She wont say anything due to my t mogging every soy shes met, i dont believe anyone shes worked with there has enough t to press his cock on her infront of everyone. I will satisfy myself in a truly blackpilled high t manner and everyone will tremble before my awesome power

Based gropemaxxer, mogs me.

Thanks guys. I will grope her titties and ass good when i work next. She will be my cum slave because my high t blackpilled groping will make her animal brain submit to me as my personal cum dumpster and fuckhole.

Bev Jo, Linda Strega and Ruston #fundie bevjoradicallesbian.wordpress.com

The Power of Names — Our Definitions

Dyke: We use this term for the most Lesbian-identified of Lesbians. It’s important to remember that it was originally used only for Butches.

Lesbian: A female who loves and falls in love with other females, makes love only with females, and never relates sexually to males or injects semen into herself. When Lesbians are single and celibate, we’re very different from celibate het women, who are still sexually, emotionally, socially, and culturally focused on men.

Lesbianism is far more than a “sexual preference” or “sexual orientation.” It is a choice of women loving women. Everything we feel and do in our lives we do as Lesbians. Our political and creative work is Lesbian. Our friendships are Lesbian relationships.

No male can become a Lesbian. “Transwomen” are simply men perving, fetishizing, and caricaturing women and Lesbians.

Female: The term we use for our sex, since it’s not age-specific and is less identified with heterosexuality than “woman.” Also, it’s a reminder of our link with other female animals on earth, who are generally called “female,” rather than “women.” And, as Julia Penelope said in The Mystery of Lesbians, “female” is derived from the French “femelle,” with no connection to the word “male,” while (crediting the writings of Monique Wittig and ideas of Ariane Brunet and Louise Turcotte) “woman” comes from “wif” (wife) and “man.”

Woman, Womyn, Wimmin, etc.: For many of us, “woman” has meant heterosexual — a “real” woman by men’s standards. It’s a male definition imposed on females and isn’t our natural state. The many feminist variations are closet terms for “Lesbian,” and we refuse to support that trend. When we say “Lesbian,” we mean it. It’s understandable that Lesbians in unsafe situations use a code name like “womyn” to make contact with other Lesbians, but when Lesbians use those terms instead of “Dyke” or “Lesbian” among ourselves, it weakens Lesbian identity. “The womyn’s community” is het-identified, not Lesbian-identified.

Some Lesbians embraced “woman” because that term is denied to many females, especially Lesbians. Men call us “girls” to demean us. However, some Lesbians prefer the term “girl” to “woman” for other reasons. For some African-descent females, poor and working-class females, Lesbians who came out before the Women’s Liberation Movement, and young females, “girl” is a familiar, affectionate term. After all, we’ve all been girls for a long time, while “woman” is a term laden with images of “adult” females who are heterosexually active, wifely, and motherly. For many of us, girlhood was the time when many girls we knew were most clear about loving other girls and rejecting boys. We support girls who call themselves “girls” as a statement of pride, and we support adult females who call themselves “girls” as part of their culture and heritage.

We also don’t call ourselves Gay women since that associates us with Gay men. That term has been a dividing line between Lesbian Feminists and non-feminists or Lesbians who felt afraid to use the term Lesbian.

david j.stewart #fundie jesus-is-savior.com

There is no law which requires a wife to obey her lawful husband, and so our society is filled with delinquent mothers without a man in the home because of divorce. Many women are becoming lesbians because they cannot relate to men anymore. Feminism has lobotomized them. All across the U.S. millions of young women in their early 20's with multiple children are looking for a husband. American women have become cantankerous nowadays, belligerent, difficult to live with because of feminist indoctrination which makes them oversensitive, intolerant and ultra-paranoid concerning their “rights.” The U.S. military is turning society's little girls into killers on the battlefield. It's a shame. Meanwhile America is dying for a lack of godly mothers and fathers. Public schools teach children their ABC's and 123's so they can work in a factory the rest of their life. A college degree means nothing these days if you expect to get a decent paying job with it. Whereas only 4% of people had a university degree in 1900, about 70% of people have college degrees in 2013... so what's the use of having a college degree if everybody has one? They are becoming worthless!

a MightyAdvisor of da Hebrews #fundie youtube.com

octavia, you're lost in this Caucasian demon worshipping bullshit. black people are the original hebrew israelites, and Our GOD YHWH, AND YaHaWasHi is the creator of this entire universe and dionysus and Zeus are nothing more than either deity men or hybrid nefilim abominations to the true GOD, the GOD of Abraham Isaacs and Jacob. wake up negro, this world is for the hebrews, the true hebrews, not referring to the dick sucking homos the Ashkenazi wanna be jews that are nothing more than the bloodline of evil Cain via satan, on this earth in this present time. Christ only came for the lost sheep of the house of Isreal, aka the negros from the americas the true Native Americans in the Hispanic that are really of negro decent. we were Never Africans, that's another throw off in the Devils trickery that he manipulates thru the pale no melanin race. black bitch wake the fuck up!!!!!?

various TERFs #fundie reddit.com

Re: Liberal feminists are so predictable I don't know whether to laugh or cry.

(blairbitchcraft)
This is literally what happened to me when I was younger - well, I recognized the whole trans thing didn’t make sense. “TERF” wasn’t a thing back then. I found more people that agreed with me and then I found a version of feminism that really resonated with me: radical feminism. But everyone hated them. So, I whistled while I walked away and didn’t look back for years.

Liberal feminism has gotten a lot more aggressive than it ever was. You used to be able to find people discussing it, discussing their honest feelings (“I don’t really FEEL like a woman; I just like looking like one,”), and people debating with respect.

It’s so weird.

(FriendlyCommie)
The irony is that the context of the aforementioned thread was I was talking about how anti-feminists claim to support intellectualism and being well-read when talking about how well read St. Jordan Peterson is, but dismiss any literature that contradicts their pre-established conclusions. Everyone in the generally progressive sub was agreeing with me, but once I mentioned rad fem literature everyone... immediately dismissed it, funnily enough.

Lib Fems pretty much forced me to become radical feminist. I remember I had a youtube channel where I used to just post very casual off the cuff videos and one time I made a video literally just saying, "Hey guys... maybe we should actually engage gender critical feminists in debates, rather than just calling them bigots and shutting them out."

The video got loads of thumbs down and some guy who had been I subscriber for ages commented saying I was literally responsible for transgender people committing suicide... just because I said we should actually talk to gender critical people.

By contrast every radical feminist community I've found so far has been incredibly accepting. This is actually one of the few places on the internet where I don't feel like I'm wrong one word away from a downvote avalanche.

Edit: how ironic that I mistyped the phrase "one wrong word"

(Kluannoa)
Yes indeed! And downvotes are one thing, but what I ''feared'' before I found radical feminism was just the abuse that you get if you say one word that's considered wrong. They made me feel like I was walking on egg shells, and that their ideology was suffocating and full of arbitrary rules, that also changed arbitrarily.

One thing that I did learn from that crowd, was the value of basic human respect. You don't make the world any better if you borderline bully someone for some honest, tiny infraction, you don't make the space more pleasant when well-meaning and sincere people get treated like witches because they used the word ''crazy'' or because they wrote ''transwoman'' instead of ''trans woman''.

These people have no respect as I see it; I think that there's something inherently disrespectful about bullying people into compliance, feeling entitled to be incredibly rude and hostile for ridiculous reasons, and always assuming the very worst about people you disagree with.

Thus, I rarely even participated in their discussions. They reminded me of my past abusers.

(afistfulofyen)
The ideologies are straight from The Abuser's Handbook. Same tactics couple with cult strategies to keep people ever guessing, ever trying, ever in line.

Good little libfems *pats heads* good little libfems, you're doing the Lord's mens' work and we appreciate most of all that you do not think for yourselves.

(justhysterical2018)
Yes! And, while they talk about inclusion, they fail to recognize that they are incredible elitists. If someone says something "wrong" (because god forbid they don't spend all their time reading woke thinkpieces) that person is immediately jumped on, rather than engaged in a discussion or provided with resources. Or, if they deign to explain, it is incredibly condescending.

I understand there may always be an elitist aspect to certain feminist discussion. But I think one of the reasons people swing to the extreme right is no one wants to be treated like they're stupid. Or called a bigot for disagreeing or having different ideas. I understand wanting no part a "movement" that forces you to walk on eggshells and allows for zero difference in ideas. I know every movement is vulnerable to ideological puritanism, but I see radical feminists as people who are generally able to disagree respectfully and who actually talk through differences in opinion rather than immediately jumping to "YOU'RE A BAD PERSON" and name calling. It's one of the things I appreciated about this sub when I first started lurking. Even though some things were shocking to me (just being so used to "trans women are women" it was a shock to the system seeing them referred to as males), I kept reading and learning because of the way people conduct themselves here. "Ohhhh these women actually care about putting women first!".

(eccentricvibe)
I'm convinced that libfems have so much anger towards radfems because the majority of us actually do research and have well rounded opinions. A lot of libfems really don't know shit about the history of feminism, all of their talking points come from Tumblr/social media in general and they dismiss 2nd wave feminism as "old TERF bullshit" even though those are the women that helped get the right to vote and better access to healthcare.

(afistfulofyen)
Libfems are the definition of birdbrained. The men need them tho: that water won't carry itself!

How I love that they compare THEMSELVES to the handmaidens when they are the aunts.

SchrodingersDick #crackpot #sexist #homophobia #transphobia incels.co

[Blackpill] My theory on lesbianism and feminism.

(It’s kind of all over the place. Not meant to be an essay; I copy pasted what I wrote offhand in a group chat with some homies.)

Possible lesbian formula:

1: Ugly: can’t get chad, sexually unsatisfied, never experienced submission to a larger-than-life dominant man

2: High standards: only wants gigachad because she is aware of his existence. No other man can match up, doesn’t want anything less than the best she’s aware of. It would be settling but she doesn’t see it as settling. finds herself not attracted at all, so thinks she’s not attracted to men period, except for the exceptional men.. Keenly receptive to mogging. Also prob damaged from being ugly in high school. Had a bad time immediately after being thrust into the sexual market/adult social hierarchy as a low value female.. did not recover.

3: Low self awareness: doesn’t realize that her disgust of 99% of men doesn’t mean she hates men with very very few exceptions/flukes, just means she’s a normal, healthy eugenicist

I dont have any personal experience with lesbians, but I seriously doubt that if you were to put one (any girl really) in a room with a gigachad, that she wouldn’t get wet, submit, and love every second of it. “You know even though I’m a lesbian, I weirdly liked it teehee I’m quirky I had these feelings I can’t explain and I felt so safe” .. shit like that. MAYBE some robust high T lesbians wouldn’t like that.. like the masculine one in a dyke relationship..

And girls turning dyke faster and with less resistance than guys “turning” gay or coming to the conclusion that they’re gay could just be female to female dynamics being unlike male to male dynamics. Foids are ok in close proximity with eachother, sharing a mate and shit.. men in proximity with eachother are sexual competition and will kill eachother for eggs.

The default life strategy for women is to trade their looks for the best deal they can get. Whether this be through prosecution, marriage, onlyfans, dating, even applying to jobs while wearing makeup, getting promotions by being hot/putting out, etc... so the Formula for a feminist is just be ugly and unable to leverage your eggs to make it through life comfortably. Be unable to exercise the default strategy for a women because you have very little value to trade and hence can not trade it for a good enough deal.. Be unsettled by this and imagine a world with an alternate source of value for women, one in which you could be considered high value (mandatory that this value metric be malleable. Personality, career, education, sense of humor, emotional strength, etc)... And then campaign and screech for society to recognize some other, malleable, source of value for women, in which, conveniently, you would have value and power in the eyes of society and most importantly your own eyes. “Women are more than their looks” - says the ugly girl.. “men are more than their height” - says the manlet. Same principle as trannies thinking their problems will go away, they will get to live in a new world with a new, more enlightened metric of value, and they will accept themselves but only after everyone else accepts, validates, and entertains their delusions. It is expecting the non malleable to adapt to the malleable. That is not how adaptation occurs. Adaptation takes the path of least resistance.

It’s really a defensive reaction to learning an uncomfortable truth about personal value, it being non malleable, and the unequal nature of people’s value. The world being generally cruel and unlike what Disney said it would be. So the world must change and there is nobility in being on the front lines. And like kaczynski said, it’s an outlet for hostility and satisfies the need for power.

The ugly feminist will stop being a feminist if she becomes hot. She won’t believe any of it anymore and won’t care about women’s progress or w/e the fuck unless doing so conspicuously confers social status to her. Feminists don’t want to be feminists, they just want to be hot. Feminism/striving for an alternate source of value is the next best option for curing their low self esteem.

The manlet will stop saying “height doesn’t matter” if he gets taller, unless for the same reason the now hot former feminist still preaches feminism. And like the feminist, the manlet doesn’t really want height acceptance, he just wants to be tall. Advocating manlet acceptance/bluepill ideology is the next best thing for his self esteem/life outcome/sexual success.

I don’t have an explanation for hot feminists. Strictly status seeking/herd mentality/tribe acceptance, or seeking high value in both metrics, both in looks, and in malleable metrics. or the handicap principle is applied. “Teehee I’m a feminist that just so happens to be hot, And I think girls shouldn’t be judged on their looks, even though I’m judged positively on my looks.. I dont put effort into my looks (because I don’t have to) and I’m still hotter than you.. im more than just my looks, I’m beauty AND brains”. Still, I’d imagine a girl with conservative friends would assimilate their beliefs and attitudes pretty quickly. Bitches are like water.

Every fake aspect of a removed-from-reality worldview is either a convenient lie or a supporting lie to back up some other convenient lie. Most people are professional copers.

Tim Cosgrove #fundie stupidatheists.blogspot.com

athiests lie because the dont like the truth. all these ass holes who dont like hearing it from christians come here to gang up on me call me names make fun of my spelling (like that matters to god) and call me a fake. it is easyer for them to call me a fake or an athiest then to deal with what i say. this is why all athiests lie. satan also lies. you figure it out. duh.

i am not intimmidated and i am not leaving blogger. learn to deal with it. go f*ck your self if you dont like my spelling.

[Some responses on this original posting calls for Poe's Law -This fundie responds the following way]

wa the fuck is poes law? this is a christian blog asshole. this is not about the law.

[I think this guy is serious.]

shawntheimmortal942 #wingnut #racist deviantart.com

I don't think I can add anymore to what Kneon said because he’s right, Marvel has made it it’s mission to attack the right, white people, and anyone who doesn’t agree with them and now it’s hurting Marvel. Karma is a bitch and honestly I’m glad this happened, they should’ve seen the writing in the wall when these far left people kept attacking fans who have criticism. How many people didn’t like lady Thor, Captain Marvel, Flacon as captain America, Asian hulk or American fucking Chavez! It’s funny to think that losing spider-man lit a fire in marvel’s ass and actually want success and not ass pats from people who won’t buy their shit anyway! It doesn’t matter what political side you’re on because money is money and Marvel wants that. Also comparing the far left to religious extremists is a really apt comparison XD

copecel2 #sexist incels.co

[JFL] iNcElS aRe A cUlT REEEEEEEEEEEE

Like feminism is not a cult. Most of the subreddits are a cult, especially when women gather together and make fun of ugly men, wishing them all the crazy shit.

There is no such thing as 'radical feminism' because it is a pleonasm. Feminism is feminism, shortly described as a misandric movement.

Females are the modern terrorists. They don't try to rule this world with guns, they act with lies.

Henry Makow #conspiracy cruelhoax.ca

FEMINISM & HOMOSEXUALITY; HOW HETEROSEXUALITY WORKS

Feminism, our official gender ideology, masquerades as a movement for women's rights. In reality, feminism is a cruel hoax, telling women their natural biological instincts are "socially constructed" to oppress them.

Feminism is elite social engineering designed to destroy gender identity, making women masculine and men feminine. Increasingly heterosexuals are being conditioned to behave like homosexuals who generally don't marry and have children. Thus courtship and monogamy are being replaced by sexual promiscuity, prophesied in Aldous Huxley's Brave New World.

The Rockefellers and Rothschilds created feminism to weaken the family and poison male-female relations (divide and conquer.) Their twin objectives are depopulation and totalitarian world government. Why? These bankers create money out of nothing and think they are God.

"Cruel Hoax" shows the connection between feminism, Communism and 9-11. It examines male-female relations and shows how we can take back our heterosexuality.

Isaiah4verse1 #sexist reddit.com

Had some feminist clown say the same thing once.

A social movement requires integrity. Women have a fundamental lack of integrity. It is for this reason that feminism, even with government and big business backing is falling apart after 40 FUCKING YEARS! LOL. If feminism were left in the hands of women alone it would have been dead in 1971.

That being said, feminism is a shit test. Women, solipsistic idiots that they are, believe they are so spectacular, that men would put up with the ultimate fitness test of feminism and still be alpha enough, in spite of the resistance to anything masculine, to gain access to their vaginas.

Again, being the idiots that the are, women made a miscalculation when they flooded the market with vagina. Now, men can get the milk without buying the cow and this is absolutely terrifying to women. The devaluing of the only value they have: vagina! So that's why feminism has shifted to neo-Victorian ideals and government sanctioned chivalry. Rape culture and the false rape epidemic, street harassment, and every thing women are doing now to stamp their feet is women's way of punishing undesirable men for simply existing. Women are mad there are fewer and fewer high status men available. Yes even the fat, ugly and otherwise undesirable ones.

Tl;dr: feminism is a shit test/beta male punishment

And genetics never once bent in favour of any social movement.

Thankfully high status men are not getting married and also the beta male backup men are starting to leave the plantation. So feminism has resulted in little more than generations of increasingly unattractive angry women.

Weston404, various incels #sexist #racist #conspiracy incels.co

[Experiment] Is 1st world feminism actually Jewish hypercapitalism rather than "muh socialism"?

Factors that you should consider:

Feminism is against the patriarchy, yet office sloots would not complain if they have to suck off a Jewish boss, or get raped by Harvey Weinstein for an acting role.

Many of the vocal, and also viral feminists are middle class Caucasian women who have never experienced poverty or crime in their liberal gated communities.

If "women of colour" are at the forefront, they are funded by mostly Jewish capitalists and companies, acting in solidarity with the Caucasian feminists.
If feminism was "socialist", why are sub8 men automatically disqualified from dating, as the feminist womyn acts like the hypercapitalist Jew and only seeks the top 0.01% of men?

Back home in Mexico, when it was under a soft version of "muh socialism", short, balding and fat drunk amigos had no difficulty marrying their looksmatch by age 20. Nowadays, their looksmatch would be on a dating app demanding 7ft + tall basketball players because of the fucking scheming, hook-nosed and rat faced Jew!

Poll: Is feminism a product of Jewish hypercapitalism rather than "muh socialism"?

Yes - 18 votes/52.9%Tempus Edax Rerum, Fakeceller, RandomGuy, anon, PoodankMcGee, Atavistic Autist, PotatoTomato, Legionarivs, Uther, Insomniac, IamLost, ManletHalfCurry, Darth Cialis, XerxesAzrael, Transcended Trucel, Toadman, black_depresso, CameronCel, RemoveNormalfags
No - 2 votes/5.9%Robtical, Mainländer
Why the Jews - 2 votes/5.9%Gyros_Pretcel, yeshuallah
Feminism is a shit test, but it’s a Jewish influence - 3 votes/8.8%aquilinenosecell, Blackpill Rage, NoCopeNoHope
AWALT - 9 votes/26.5%Sadness, Murdoch89, happiless, D3X, littlemanhikicel, Neggr, Shigechi, sub8male, HonklerTheConqueror, BOB

Jeff Gregory #racist users.westnet.gr

Hey you nigger loving mother fucking pussy ass jew bastards why don't you get a fucken Bible and read these fucken passages you assholes (LUKE 22:36) and (DEUTORONOMY 7). Ther are a bunch of fucken other passages in there that are true I don't remember those passages but there is a story of the guy who killed the fucken nigger and that white who where fucking and the city of saddam was destroyed because those fucken assholes in the city where faggots, and on the fucken passages I read on LUKE 22 Jesus sais that if you don't have a sword which is equivilent to a gun now'r days and DEUTORONOMY 7 it tell that if and of the races mix that we shall destroy there images burn there crops and utterly destroy them, so take your fucken NEW WORLD ORDER your LIBERALISIM your HUMANISTISM (your religeon thinking you worshiping god but your really being tricked) your YOUR SO CALLED SO CALLED "Love Sees No Color" shit and shove it up back your damn assholes you fucken jew ass fucken nigger lovin shits the jews are the sons of satan and the other fucken Sheep that are controlled by your bullshit governments you jew ass dummies you damn fuckers you think your worshiping god but your really worshiping satan you better be ready for a RACIAL HOLY WAR! HAIL THE LORD!!! HEIL HITLER!!! SIEG HEIL!!!

Pancake Loach #fundie pancakeloach.wordpress.com

Feminists are literally the worst people in America – especially if you judge them by standard “social justice” metrics.

Let’s do the link roundup first:

Insty: “[Feminists are] horrible, damaged people who want to address their own problems by making other people suffer.”

Which is in reference to this Extremely Long Slate Star Codex piece, called “Untitled“. Caution: explicit reference to feminist hypocrisy, power-mongering, and general ugly hatefulness abound, complete with actual facts showing that the feminists are liars and they know it.

But you know, besides all the usual hypocrisy and naked power-grabbing going on by the feminists referenced in the above piece, all I could think about was that a man had come forward, saying that feminism nearly caused him to commit suicide, and DID cause him to beg his therapist to approve his castration, and all the feminists had was yet more social disapproval, scorn, and hate for him. (Kudos for the therapist saying no, the problem is not your heterosexuality.)

By the way, young males have the highest rates of suicide of any broad demographic in the country.

FEMINISTS. ARE. KILLING. PEOPLE.

And not just the millions of murdered babies. Do you think that Scott Aaronson is the only young male who heard loud and clear feminism’s message that male = worthless monster? That heterosexual desire is to be despised and rejected? (Not even Christian ministries to “pray the gay away” are as vitriolic about homosexual desire as feminists are about male heterosexual desire.) If anti-homosexual attitudes are even partially culpable for the suicides of homosexuals, then how much more culpable must feminists be when they teach vulnerable young men who are socially awkward but otherwise perfectly nice to hate themselves so much they want to DIE?

Feminists are monsters. Anyone who is not a monster and identifies as feminist is identifying AS A MONSTER. They need to be corrected, because all the non-monstrous people identifying as feminist are providing cover for and enabling the damaged, sociopathic bullies who form the core of feminism. As Vox Day says, “Feminism is a Satanic, anti-Christian, anti-reason, anti-science ideology that destroys literally everything it touches and everyone who embraces it. Reject it and its adherents the way you would reject someone offering you plutonium on their bare hands; to accept it is to begin to die a slow and painful death.”

Next in the roundup: a response by a female nerd, saying a lot of things I’d like to say, like “fuck you, feminists” – and pointing out how feminists also like to bully other women.

However, there’s no way for logic and reason to get through to a feminist. They are raging beasts, roaming about looking for people to devour (and if you are not any of the above, you should get out before you become one; the ideology is designed to lead you gently along the path to Hell, step by gradual step). So instead, let’s see some advice for nerds in another Insty roundup. These links – and the links in the links – are incredibly useful advice for more than just bullied nerds, so make sure to spawn those additional tabs! (Some of those links in the chain were idea-fodder for yesterday’s post, and I’ve only just got around to reading more of them myself, so go thou and also read.)

But here’s the problem: the shunning part only works for the Shy Male Nerd after he has grown up and gotten a job and moved out of the house. Which means that for his entire childhood and his most vulnerable adolescent years, he’s going to be immersed in a toxic sea of feminism, because feminism is the dominant ideology of mainstream America. What if his mother is a feminist, like the one described in the Rant of the Female Nerd, above? Kind of hard to shun your mother when you’re entirely dependent on her (and she’s probably already driven your father away or “henpecked” – the cute name for domestic abuse when a woman does it – him into a doormat).

This is where I go back to the introduction and tie in the “feminists are the worst people in the America by social justice metrics” point. Feminism is the ideology of institutional power in 2015 America. Feminists control education, from female-dominated primary schools all the way through higher education; cross feminist dogma and you’ll get in deep trouble, as Lawrence Summers found out. The head of UVA used the excuse of a false rape accusation in order to punish UVA’s fraternities for something that never happened. Kangaroo courts convened by universities routinely and blithely ruin male students’ lives – when men are already a minority in higher education. The government gives special benefits to women and convenes special task forces and institutes special social services for them – the courts even give female criminals lighter sentences. The media constantly trumpets the female-centric tenets and attitude of feminism (when they’re not fanning racial tensions) and derides anyone who dares to disagree.

Social justice warriors like to define racism as “racial prejudice plus power.” Those of us who aren’t ideologues looking to excuse the despicable behavior of protected in-groups laugh at the “plus power” part, but when you look at modern society, it is WOMEN WHO HAVE THE POWER, and particularly feminist women and their male allies (who may be amoral creeps out to use feminism for their own ends). Ordinary, non-feminist successful women get absolutely demonized for not toeing the feminist line whenever they dare to attract public attention, and any non-feminist male (as well as insufficiently servile feminist males) can count on truckloads of vitriol. Meanwhile, feminists defended the most powerful man in the world as he betrayed his wife, his daughter, his intern, and who knows how many other women in his past.

But this litany is just to point out that even by their own SocJus metric, feminists are the oppressors in today’s America. Their bigoted, sexist ideology wields power through the federal government, social welfare policies, the court system, all levels of institutional education, and corporate policy when it comes to employment or even use of social media, due to the combination of feminist regulation from the government side and fear of social media mobs on the public relations side.

Scott Alexander compares feminist bigotry to anti-Semitism in “Untitled” – if you don’t have time to read now, just skim down for the pictures of men with beards. It’s uncanny how close those images align, isn’t it? But I don’t think of feminism as patterning after anti-Semitism quite yet – especially since the beard thing is merely one small facet of masculinity that feminism attacks. I think feminists are actually more like Jim Crow Lite. After all, they’re using some of the same arguments as the KKK – and they stand for government-mandated privileges for women, and penalties for men. They haven’t actually gotten around to putting their “kill all men” or “reduce men to 10% of the population for breeding purposes” yet the way the anti-Semitic Nazis backed up their prejudices with violence, but they’ve definitely got the “institutionalized discrimination by government and society” part down pat. Thus, Jim Crow Lite.

It’s true that there are, in fact, worse ideologies running loose in the broader world today. Communism, its fraternal twin socialism, and their adopted brother Islam, for example. But I’m not convinced that feminism isn’t their little sister, just waiting until she’s all grown up and firmly grasps the levers of power before she starts outright murdering the targets of her hatred. And as far as America goes? Feminism is definitely doing the most damage.

(And now, for a tangentally related palate cleanser after peering too closely into the abyss – a modest proposal from Dalrock.)

handiacefailure #racist niggermania.net

Like you I moved out of what was becoming a major niggerhood a couple years ago into an all human condo building and took a beating on my old place (ended up having to sell it at an auction for almost half what I paid for it and I put a lot of improvements including a new HVAC system into it and new appliances) and my taxes are a lot higher here but it was so worth it. You made the right move, your house values would only continue to decline.

What really pisses me off is the shit they buy with their EBT cards. These niggers only buy expensive name brand stuff, never use coupons and buy food that is loaded in sugar and fat and 99% of them need to be on a diet and then they have a shitload of kids with them. I think government handouts should only be given to people over 65 and people that truly can't work (should have to be certified by a human doctor not some fat government nigger) or vets, otherwise limit the gibs to six months.

When I was in college I got really sick one quarter and had to take a medical drop and in order to finish on time I had to take a really heavy load my last year of college to make up for the medical drop. I had scholarships but still had expenses like books and housing to pay for and was working 20+ hours during school and 40 hours at a full time job and delivering pizzas part time as well during the summer and breaks and couldn't work many hours due to the load my final year.

I decided to get food stamps during my final year. First quarter I was working 20 hours a week and when I used the food stamps I was buying stuff like store brand Mac and Cheese and Ramen noodles, and felt guilty buying a 12 pack of diet coke each week. Second semester I had to really cut back and was taking 20 credit hours and could only work 10 hours a week and was told that since I was in school and didn't have kids I had to work 20 hours a week to qualify.

That is so fucked up. Someone going to college taking 20 hours who wants food stamps for six months and will never get them again and will be paying a shit load of taxes after college to support lazy niggers is required to work 20 hours a week but a lazy fat nigger who doesn't shit except sit around on their fat ass watching oprah cranking out future welfare receipients plus getting Medicaid and Section ape and WIC and lord knows what else isn't required to work and they will be in the system for the rest of their life cranking out who knows how many other welfare cases.

Shawntheimmortal942 #wingnut #racist #conspiracy deviantart.com

So you can riot all you want and Chicago is really prepared for all these rioters despite you defunding them and you’re “for the cause“...but you don’t want these “protesters” at your front door? Lori Lightfoot is at least being honest for how much of a piece of shit she is and it’s so funny how democrats want to support rioters and shit all over the police but they don’t want these “protesters“ anywhere near their homes? Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

I think Razorfists right when he said there’s a civil war in the left, you have the moderates vs the crazies or the crazies vs the crazies because when they’re not bullshit shitting about Trump they’re kicking their own asses! How is that the left has turned into such a fucking circus?

cassandra #racist joystiq.com

why are there not alot of hispanics? simple nobody likes u, i dont care how many of u guys are here "illegally to boot" ur not making it easy to like u, protesting on the streets like idiots when u shouldnt be here in the first place, dumbest in class, waving stupid mexican flags...

who the fuck can take that bull shit? blasting ranchero music... yeah we dont want mexicans in our games, ur culture isn't cool like the japanese. so stfu. and go gang bang or something

Nya Nya Jo #fundie edendecoded.com

Before I get into the heart of this article, I want to say this: The LGBT has an agenda, and it's not what you think it is.

The documentary below, 'Inside the Homosexual Agenda' gives a revealing look into their motives, and serves as a good starting point to understand the information I'm going to discuss below...

You may not be aware of this, but just about everything, and I mean nearly EVERYTHING you see on TV, in movies, in magazines, in the fashion world, and in music, has been controlled by the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) community since the 1970's if not earlier.

Through their monopolization of the media, LGBTs have charmed their way into our homes, into our mindsets, into our religious views and into our sex lives. The seduction was overt.

EVERYTHING IN THE MEDIA OVER THE PAST 40 YEARS has blurred the line between true masculinity and femininity: effeminate (girly) men and mannish (boyish) women. Nearly every show in the 1990's gave a manufactured glimpse into gay and lesbian 'love.' Pushing same-sex intimacy as normal, we were told that they were born that way, and that everyone needs to embrace their latent same-sex attraction.

LGBT SEDUCTION OF CHILDREN OCCURRED THROUGH the most popular children and family shows: The Odd Couple, Three's Company, Bosom Buddies, Laverne & Shirley, Three Men and a Baby, Full House, Roseanne, The Real World, Beverly Hills 90210, Xena, Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Dawson's Creek, Frasier, Ellen, Spongebob & Glee. Within these family shows, LGBTs used an overwhelming number of suggestive images, subliminal messages and in many cases direct promotion of gay & lesbian intimacy.

I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but don't let the LGBT's rainbow fool you; the pot of gold at the end of their rainbow is fool's gold. They've simply used the rainbow imagery to lure children into their grasp.

Behind the scenes, LGBTs are violent. They physically attack anyone who doesn't agree with them, they bully and intimidate anyone and even elderly women are not exempt.

The LGBT's main goal was and always has been to have sex with children. And what better way to accomplish their goal than by indoctrinating impressionable-developing minds with a sympathetic heart and a curiosity about gay and lesbian relationships and sex.

The LGBT knew that once they sparked a young child's interest, they can almost guarantee that the child will then seek out and welcome older LGBT people to explore their sexuality with.

The LGBT is ultimately a predator, spearheaded by white affluent gay men. These white gay men have been systematically at the root of this seduction of children, mainly boys.

Below you will find a 1967 Mike Wallace documentary titled 'The Homosexuals,' that shows the true face of the LGBT movement.

AS YOU CAN SEE, the gay movement used willful lesbians, bisexuals and transgender people as an elaborate front to hide behind. They knew as white gay men, they could never argue for civil rights issues, so they let lesbian women and minority gays, black gay men and black lesbian women, to join their team. Without having women and minorities included in the gay initiative, they knew no one would ever view homosexuality as a Civil Rights issue. They also knew that once they got the Civil Rights label, they could get ANY homosexual law passed, gay sex, education at school, gay adoption etc.

Many of the gay men in the LGBT community, are also a part of pedophile & pederasty organization called North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA). This association seeks to abolish the age of consent laws criminalizing adult sexual involvement with children, and campaigns for the release of all men who have been jailed for sexual contact with children.

I was disgusted when I learned this. The LGBT alliance with pedophiles was confirmed in the 1979 National march on Washington for Lesbian and Gay rights program. In this document, the LGBT community welcomed pederasts (men who engage in anal intercourse with boys) and pubescents (young teenage children). [...]

Remember: a pederast is a man that has anal intercourse with boys. Now why would the LGBT community welcome them if they didn't endorse pedophilia?

In recent years, the LGBT community claimed to not condone pedophilia, but their willful allegiance was documented. They've creatively repackaged their pedophile allegiance into gay adoption, the anti-bully campaign, the labelling of any and all anti-homosexuality comments into hate speech, and their desire to lower the age of consent for teenagers to engage in same-sex relationships with adults.

As previously stated, the original face of the gay movement was white affluent gay men. They knew that they couldn't easily access boys (the American public wasn't having it), so they settled for men for the time being. But as you can see clearly above, they had boys as their prime target all along.

The founders of the gay movement have systematically and legally used the media and the legal system to get closer to being able to legally have sex with boys.

Well known actor Corey Feldman gives a candid interview about the predatory habits of pedophiles behind the media industry.

I want to caution you: Each law you allow to pass for the LGBT community, the closer you allow pedophile and pederasty organizations like NAMBLA and Butterfly Kisses(female pedophiles) to molest children, even your own children.

We have allowed them to seduce and create a generation of young people who willingly agree to be sexually abused. One day, these children who 'think' they are LGBT, will push for the government to allow them to have the legal right to participate in homosexual and lesbian sex, all under the guise of being 'born' attracted to the same-sex.

And meanwhile in the background, groups like NAMBLA and Butterfly Kisses, along with other LGBT groups, will be silently waiting to have consensual sex with the very children they've seduced through all sorts of media.

THE MORE RIGHTS GIVEN TO THE LGBT, the more perverse our society will get. Before you know it, you will have a man with real-life breast having sex on primetime TV. And then you will have to explain to your child that some MEN have breasts too... see how sick that is?

Don't our children deserve to maintain their innocence? Why do we continue to allow them to be sexualized with this type of media?

We have allowed a small group of people, less than 4% of the total United States population, to dictate to the rest of us 96% about how to teach and raise our children.

W. F. Price #fundie web.archive.org

The biggest problem with the men’s rights movement is its failure to see the big picture. For some reason, people think they can separate feminism and gender issues from a larger philosophical problem. This is wishful thinking. It can’t be done.

There’s a reason the feminists latched onto Marxist philosophy like a child to his mother’s teat. It provided them with a philosophical framework – a faith, really – that allowed them to deny the realities of human nature by assigning inequalities to political struggles. There are some truths in Marxism. Political and economic inequalities are real, and often stand in stark contrast to natural inequalities, hence the use of the concept of natural law to strike down privileges of birth and other “accidental” advantages enjoyed by some over others.

Today, however, people fail to see the original intent of these movements. In fact, they have an often inverted notion of them. For example, the idea that a woman should be privileged over a man in hiring preference is more akin to the old notion of nobility by birth than it is to the Founding Fathers’ concept of equality.

In fact, the notion that men and women are equal would have been very strange to even the most radical of Enlightenment thinkers. Yet by mysterious twists of fate (and possibly liberal English resistance to French Republicanism), the feminists have coopted the ideology.

So what we are left with today is a twisted interpretation of what was a flawed philosophy to begin with. Now that Enlightenment and Marxist notions of inequality as a more or less purely political, cultural construct, have been discredited, we are left with an increasingly dysfunctional guiding faith in a fallen god.

Is the key to cling to the old idols, hanging on with eyes tightly shut against the mounting body of evidence that we were wrong, or to accept that we made some mistakes along the way and move on? To me, the latter seems far more reasonable.

But in order to move on, we have to reject all that follows from the errors — not just those things that we personally dislike. So if it turns out that, say, men and women are not by nature equal, then we can’t say we want equality on our terms. Instead, we have to make an effort to learn the truth, and then we can go about accommodating it.

So the real problem is not merely feminism, but the original error, which includes a great deal more than that.

Therefore, if you oppose feminism and its associated evils, the most effective way to fight it is to debunk the false philosophy that supports it. And this means we cannot indulge men who adhere to the same principles, whether they are on “our side” or not.

What it really comes down to is truth vs. error, but because “equality” is such a powerful concept today, it must be attacked head on and by name before people can begin to perceive the error. Hence my recent articles on the subject.

Roosh Valizadeh #fundie returnofkings.com

It was Joe’s first date with Mary. He asked her what she wanted in life and she replied, “I want to establish my career. That’s the most important thing to me right now.” Undeterred that she had no need for a man in her life, Joe entertained her with enough funny stories and cocky statements that she soon allowed him to lightly pet her forearm.

At the end of the date, he locked arms with her on the walk to the subway station, when two Middle Eastern men on scooter patrol accosted them and said they were forbidden to touch. “This is Sharia zone,” they said in heavily accented English, in front of a Halal butcher shop. Joe and Mary felt bad that they offended the two men, because they were trained in school to respect all religions but that of their ancestors. One of the first things they learned was that their white skin gave them extra privilege in life which must be consciously restrained at all times. Even if they happened to disagree with the two men, they could not verbally object because of anti-hate laws that would put them in jail for religious discrimination. They unlocked arms and maintained a distance of three feet from each other.

Unfortunately for Joe, Mary did not want to go out with him again, but seven years later he did receive a message from her on Facebook saying hello. She became vice president of a company, but could not find a man equal to her station since women now made 25% more than men on average. Joe had long left the country and moved to Thailand, where he married a young Thai girl and had three children. He had no plans on returning to his country, America.

If cultural collapse occurs in the way I will now describe, the above scenario will be the rule within a few decades. The Western world is being colonized in reverse, not by weapons or hard power, but through a combination of progressivism and low reproductive rates. These two factors will lead to a complete cultural collapse of many Western nations within the next 200 years. This theory will show the most likely mechanism that it will proceed in America, Canada, UK, Scandinavia, and Western Europe.

...

The Cultural Collapse Progression

1. Removal of religious narrative from people’s lives, replaced by a treadmill of scientific and technological “progress.”

2. Elimination of traditional sex roles through feminism, gender equality, political correctness, cultural Marxism, and socialism.

3. Delay or abstainment of family formation by women to pursue careerist lifestyles while men wait in confused limbo.

4. Decreasing birth rate among native population.

5. Government enactment of open immigration policies to prevent economic collapse.

6. Immigrant refusal to fully acclimate, forcing host culture to adopt external rituals and beliefs while being out-reproduced.

7. Natives becoming marginalized in their own country.

1. Removal of religious narrative

Religion has been a powerful restraint for millennia in preventing humans from pursuing their base desires and narcissistic tendencies so that they satisfy a god. Family formation is the central unit of most religions, possibly because children increase membership at zero marginal cost to the church (i.e. they don’t need to be recruited).

Religion may promote scientific ignorance, but it facilitates reproduction by giving people a narrative that places family near the center of their existence.[1] [2] [3] After the Enlightenment, the rapid advance of science and its logical but nihilistic explanations into the universe have removed the religious narrative and replaced it with an empty narrative of scientific progress, knowledge, and technology, which act as a restraint and hindrance to family formation, allowing people to pursue individual goals of wealth accumulation or hedonistic pleasure seeking.[4] As of now, there has not been a single non-religious population that has been able to reproduce above the death rate.[5]

...

2. Elimination of traditional sex roles

Once religion no longer plays a role in people’s lives, the stage is set to fracture male-female bonding. It is collectively attacked by several ideologies stemming from the beliefs of Cultural Marxist theory, which serve to accomplish one common end: destruction of the family unit so that citizens are dependent on the state. They achieve this goal through the marginalization of men and their role in society under the banner of “equality.”[6] With feminism pushed to the forefront of this umbrella movement, the drive for equality ends up being a power grab by women.[7] This attack is performed on a range of fronts:

medicating boys from a young age with ADHD drugs to eradicate displays of masculinity[8]
shaming of men for having direct sexual interest in attractive and fertile women
criminalization of normal male behavior by redefining some instances of consensual sex as rape[9]
imprisonment of unemployed fathers for non-payment of child support, rendering them destitute and unable to be a part of their children’s lives[10]
taxation of men at higher rates for redistribution to women[11] [12]
promotion of single mother and homosexual lifestyles over that of the nuclear family[13] [14]

The end result is that men, confused about their identify and averse to state punishment from sexual harassment, “date rape,” and divorce proceedings, make a rational decision to wait on the sidelines.[15] Women, still not happy with the increased power given to them, continue their assault on men by instructing them to “man up” into what has become an unfair deal—marriage. The elevation of women above men is allowed by corporations, which adopt “girl power” marketing to expand their consumer base and increase profits.[16] [17] Governments also allow it because it increases their tax revenue. Because there is money to be made with women working and becoming consumers, there is no effort by the elite to halt this development.
3. Women begin to place career above family

At the same time men are emasculated as mere “sperm donors,” women are encouraged to adopt the career goals, mannerisms, and competitive lifestyles of men, inevitably causing them to delay marriage, often into an age where they can no longer find suitable husbands who have more resources than themselves. [18] [19] [20] [21] The average woman will find it exceedingly difficult to balance career and family, and since she has no concern of getting “fired” from her family, who she may see as a hindrance to her career goals, she will devote an increasing proportion of time into her job.

Female income, in aggregate, will soon match or exceed that of men.[22] [23] [24] A key reason that women historically got married was to be economically provided for, but this reason will no longer persist and women will feel less pressure or motivation to marry. The burgeoning spinster population will simply be a money-making opportunity for corporations to market to an increasing population of lonely women. Cat and small dog sales will rise.

Women succumb to their primal sexual and materialistic urges to live the “Sex and the City” lifestyle full of fine dining, casual sex, technological bliss, and general gluttony without learning traditional household skills or feminine qualities that would make them attractive wives.[25] [26] Men adapt to careerist women in a rational way by doing the following:

to sate their natural sexual desires, men allow their income to lower since economic stability no longer provides a draw to women in their prime[27]
they mimic “alpha male” social behavior to get laid with women who, without having an urgent need for a man’s monetary resources to survive, can choose men based on confidence, aesthetics, and general entertainment value[28]
they withdraw into a world of video games and the internet, satisfying their own base desires for play and simulated hunting[29] [30]

Careerist women who decide to marry will do so in a hurried rush around 30 because they fear growing old alone, but since they are well past their fertility peak[31], they may find it difficult to reproduce. In the event of successful reproduction at such a later age, fewer children can be born before biological infertility, limiting family size compared to the historical past.

...

Cultural decline begins in earnest when the natives feel shame or guilt for who they are, their history, their way of life, and where their ancestors came from. They will let immigrant groups criticize their customs without protest, or they simply embrace immigrant customs instead with religious conversion and interethnic marriages. Nationalistic pride will be condemned as a “far-right” phenomenon and popular nationalistic politicians will be compared to Hitler. Natives learn the art of self-censorship, limiting the range of their speech and expressions, and soon only the elderly can speak the truths of the cultural decline while a younger multiculturalist within earshot attributes such frankness to senility or racist nostalgia.

With the already entrenched environment of political correctness (see stage 2), the local culture becomes a sort of “world” culture that can be declared tolerant and progressive as long as there is a lack of criticism against immigrants, multiculturalism, and their combined influence. All cultural identity will eventually be lost, and to be “American” or “British,” for example, will no longer have modern meaning from a sociological perspective. Native traditions will be eradicated and a cultural mixing will take place where citizens from one world nation will be nearly identical in behavior, thought, and consumer tastes to citizens of another. Once a collapse occurs, it cannot be reversed. The nation’s cultural heritage will be forever lost.

...

How To Stop Cultural Collapse

Maintaining native birth rates while preventing the elite from allowing immigrant labor is the most effective means at preventing cultural collapse. Since multiculturalism is an experiment with no proven efficacy, a culture can only be maintained by a relatively homogenous group who identify with each other. When that homogeneity breaks down and one citizen looks to the next and does not see a person with the same values as himself, the culture falls in dis-repair as native citizens begin to lose a shared means of communication and identity. Once the percentage of the immigrant population crosses a certain threshold (perhaps 15%), the decline will pick up in pace and cultural breakdown will be readily apparent to all observers.

Current policies to solve low birth rates through immigration is a short-term fix with dire long-term consequences. In effect, it’s a Trojan-horse prescription of irreversible cultural destruction. A state must prevent itself from entering the position where mass immigration is considered a solution by blocking progressive ideologies from taking hold. One way this can be done is through the promotion of a state-sponsored religion which encourages the nuclear family instead of single motherhood and homosexuality. However, introducing religion as a mainstay of citizen life in the post-enlightenment era may be impossible.

We must consider that the scientific era is an evolutionary maladaptive feature of humanity that natural selection will accordingly punish (i.e. those who are anti-religious and pro-science will simply breed less). It must also be considered that with religion in permanent decline, cultural collapse may be a certainty that eventually occurs in all developed nations. Religion, it may turn out, was evolutionary beneficial to the human race.

Another possible solution is to foster a patriarchal society where men serve as strong providers. If you encourage the development of successful men who possess indispensable skills and therefore resources that are lacked by females, there will be women below their station who want to marry and procreate with them, but if strong women are produced instead, marriage and procreation is unlikely to take place at levels above the death rate.

A gap between the sexes should always exist in the favor of men if procreation is to occur at high rates, or else you’ll have something similar to the situation in America where urban professional women cannot find “good men” to begin a family with (i.e., men who are significantly more financially successful than them). They instead remain single and barren, only used occasionally by cads for exciting casual sex.

FR #sexist feminist-reprise.org

I get to thinking how, for more than 30 years now, feminists have been talking about the fallout of male violence that we live with. For more than 30 years we’ve been detailing the abuse that men have heaped upon us, in every fashion they’ve been able to imagine. More recently, we’ve been locating oppressions and decontextualizing sexualities and situating ourselves within our positionalities, and you know what? The stories keep coming.

None of this is women’s fault, but it seems to me we’ve managed to identify damn few alternatives. Men ought to change, clearly. Their behavior is inhuman and unjust and unacceptable. Rape, battering, war, capitalist exploitation–they should stop doing all of this immediately.

But it doesn’t seem to me that we’re getting very far by saying, “Stop raping us! Stop it! I mean it! Stop raping us!” We know that most women and children are abused by men they know, but we still befriend males, we still drink with them, we still let our teenagers date them, we still leave our toddlers alone with them. Anytime any feminist suggests letting young women know the real odds, to give them a chance to learn from other women’s experience when making decisions about their own safety, she gets jumped all over by just about everyone, from MRAs and libfems screeching #NotAllMen to radical feminists accusing her of blaming women for being raped.

Of course men’s violence isn’t our fault, of course they should change, of course we deserve autonomy without sacrificing our safety — but has the sex class man shown any indication that they’re going to change anytime soon?

I’ve never been the kind of person to sit around and wait for other people to do what I want them to, particularly after I learned, at a fairly tender age, the new-agey sounding but no less true adage that the only person one can change is oneself.

I still see a lot of feminists writing and talking and acting as if we really can’t get on without the men. I understand perfectly well that they want the men; that lots of women, lots of feminists, enjoy social and sexual relationships with men despite the dangers attendant on those relationships. I also understand perfectly well that women who can attach themselves to a man, whether by finding one who’s halfway decent or by learning to somehow live with varying degrees of sexism and abuse, often do better materially for themselves and their children than they would have on their own. That’s not an accident–that’s part of how male supremacy makes individual women dependent on individual men.

And yet–how to account for those of us who are managing to muddle through, somehow, without men’s money or their penises?

Which brings me back to the historical arguments for lesbian-feminism/separatism.

There were some women who thought about the fact that patriarchy is built upon the usurpation and direction of women’s emotional energy, sexuality, and labor into the support of men’s interests; they stood back and scratched their heads and said, “Hey, what would happen if we, being women, directed our emotional energy, sexuality and labor to the support of women’s interests?”

(..)

Nevertheless, there are lots of ways of prioritizing relationships with women, without involving sexuality. As just one example, what about creating a cooperative arrangement with another woman or women –neighbors? roommates? — to live more cheaply and have help with household chores and childcare, as well as companionship? Why don’t more women do this? It’s a question I, as a childless lesbian-feminist, cannot answer, but I sure think straight feminists ought to be doing more to encourage their sisters to take care of themselves and each other in these ways.

With that said, I will also opine that the belief that sexual orientation is innate and inborn is a big patriarchal lie. Patriarchy’s convinced many women that the only alternatives to an unsatisfying heterosexual relationship are a worse one, or being “alone.” It’s patriarchy that tells us that sisters doin’ it for themselves is nothing but a joke or a male fantasy. If sexual proclivity is inborn and unchanging, how do we account for the hundreds or thousands of women who came out as lesbians after entering the Women’s Liberation Movement in the 1970s? How do we explain the fact that women leave heterosexual marriages for other women every day, well into the new millenium?

(...)

Some feminists seem to think men will stop raping and battering and killing just because we ask them to, as though it’s simply a misunderstanding that keeps patriarchy on its feet. Some want the lovely pink cinderella fantasy to be real, rather than seeing it for patriarchal brainwashing. Some of us don’t want to understand that men are not going to hand over their privilege, that the transformation of happy heterosexuality into something real and egalitarian won’t begin until women refuse to participate in the institution as it currently exists.

Think about it: Did labor unions say to workers, “Well, we know that some of you have really good jobs with employers who only exploit you a little, and you have a great relationship with your boss, so you all keep on working. The rest of us will go on strike to try to get better wages for everybody.” Of course not. They knew that some workers’ positive experiences or fair treatment didn’t negate the analysis that the system is exploitive and only collective action in the form of refusal to participate by all will change it.

(...)

If we really want that safe feminist world, women are going to have to let go of desires for male approval and male love and start to build something with other women–not because rape is our fault or because justice is our responsibility but because men like raping women and they like hitting women and they like controlling women and they’re not going to stop until they have to. All that rhetoric about “giving up heterosexual privilege” wasn’t about being politically correct or cool or cutting edge; it was about the recognition that justice can’t exist within the system that created the injustice in the first place.

(...)

Don’t think I’m saying it will be easy. Men will probably freak out if they see lots of “their” women (not just those throwaway hairy fat dyke freaks) actually making real attempts at solidarity; look how much just the ideas of feminism put forward on blogs and internet bulletin boards scare the shit out of them. So they’re going to put up a fuss.

But I believe we can make a start, because I’ve seen it done by just a few women who are willing to dedicate the bulk of their time, energy and resources to it, and who are willing to give up a lot of the comforts and conveniences most of us think we can’t live without. I know I can’t do it by myself, and I’m as scared as any of you. But I just keep thinking, what if there were 10 or 50 or 1000 of us and we were holding out our hands to each other and saying, “I’m scared, but I’m ready to make other women my priority so that we can start to build the world we want, together.” What if?

Timothy Dukeman #fundie afellowtruthseeker.blogspot.com

[Bolding mine]

Feminism draws several stark contrasts with the truth of revealed Scripture, rejecting biblical paradigms at every turn. In fact, for the Christian, feminism is best described as a declaration of war against the Bible’s teaching on sexuality. It should be recognized up front that feminism is not a Christian worldview; in fact it is an anti-Christian worldview. The Bible teaches that God created us Male and Female. Feminism teaches that gender is a social construct. The Bible teaches that men and women have distinct roles. Feminism teaches that the gender roles are evil and the Bible is an evil, patriarchal book. Those who hold to Feminism with even a modicum of consistency are lost. Many of them are themselves antichrists.

Some incels #psycho #sexist #fundie reddit.com

(Officer_McGrady)

The fact that “step-families” are so normal now just proves how sick we’ve become.

[This got deleted for inciting violence, but, in a nutshell, it was: Him angry that he only ever wanted one dad, one mom and to be a blood family together, him angry that due to his mom’s “whoring” and his father’s “escapades” (some word like that) he now has a family where one of the parents obviously treats him differently than their biological children, and angrily finishing the post hoping this society will be punished by “the Lord” or “Chinese invaders with machine guns” (which is the violence-inciting part that got it deleted)]

(Safebrowse)

Tfw my mother broke up with my 5'6" hard working dad to be with an alcoholic guy who's a foot taller. First black pill of my life, really. Sometimes I question if I'm really my dad's biological son because luckily I didn't grow up to be that short.

Your mother cared more about her own fun than her child’s mental development.

Despite what Soyciety shoves down our throats, step-families aren’t a good thing.

Yeah I know, I know she regrets having me too, to an extent. She knows too, she knows that her moving us around constantly fucked things up for me, but I doubt she'd take it back. I try to move forward with my life but after a lot of self reflection I realized that she's the core to a lot of my issues. Step families are selfish and broken, I've never felt like I've belonged with any of my family members.

Also when she was "taking a break" from my dad, another guy approached her who was ridiculously rich and really, really kind. We would have been set for life, but he was also short and kind of chubby. She says that things just didn't "click" with him. Of course things clicked when the 6'6" guy popped into her life. He was living with his parents and apparently farted on their first date. Even burnt out Chad's don't have to try.

(IAMA124)

I agree, recently everytime I browse subreddits like r/relationships and r/amitheasshole (for some weird reason) they are full of words like "stepmom", "stepdad", "mother's boyfriend", "ex-wife", "stepbrother" and the like, makes me worried about my future... I don't want to work my ass off my entire life just to end up having a shitty family like that.

Hell, even my parents are divorced and my dad's already found a new woman and I'm pretty sure my mother's "friend" is something else as well.

(MerkuryNj)

I heard recently that only 50% of children in america live with both biological parents, and trending upwards. Crazy.

(actuallybrazilian)

it'll only get worse. women imperative will continue to grow stronger and it s not like the incentives for individualism will disappear.

step families put in evidence, more than normal, the transactional nature of male-female relationship, so it s no wonder it s disgusting to see.

at this point my objective is to get enough money and disappear in the countryside. society does not respect my opinion, does not follow my values and worse of all, 99% of the time i have to deal with bullshit whose origin is not even me, a faggot that does not have basic respect hearing music at max volume in the night, dogs pooping in the front of the house/barking with owners that don t give a fuck because what the dog fills in his void inside is more important than basic education, all types of family drama etc.

(CantoArchangel)

I was always glad my parents came frome other countries because they're still together. Their cultures actually take the vows seriously. Most American families are a mess lol, fucking degenerates.

(jotaro_kuj0)

being an indian, i was always surprized watching step-families in american tv shows & movies and was always weirded out..like what the fuck is this shit ? dont they have normal families anymore ? but yeah i feel for you.

(Basedafff)

My entire experience of consuming western media and culture has been a big WTF ever since i was 14.

I still vividly remember how the degeneracy in shows like 'Friends' or 'BBT' used to shock the fuck out of me.

Lol. When i was a child i believed tight knit blood families are the natural order of things because that's how things are here. Atleast for now. I couldn't ever fathom this step mom step dad bullcrap as a child.

One thing i tell you, it takes sacrifices. Something the selfish materialistic west doesn't have the patience for.

(FromHToA92)

I wanted to murder my step dad he was such a beta cuck piece of shit

(Serial_Piller666)

The worst situation is having a step or adoptive father who is dramatically less intelligent than you and made you feel self-conscious and like a freak growing up because he was incapable of comprehending your thoughts or interests or tastes and gave you this awkward "wtf" reaction to everything you said and did.

It's not true that everyone has a rich internal world and existential struggles just like you. There really are people out there who are just automata who don't care about anything except baseball and fishing, have never even considered the implications of having wasted their whole lives in miserable wagecucking, and are perfectly happy being a lifelong beta provider for Tyrone's used, expired goods.

Many of you here are an evolutionary divergence from human kind and should properly consider the masses to be a hostile outgroup with whom there is no social contract, no different from snarling animals in the wilderness.

GreekSymmetrics #sexist #crackpot reddit.com

Why are modern urologists/endocrinologists so misandristic and ignorant?

Claiming that a 4 Inch length 2 Inch girth penis is normal and totally acceptable….

Just lol at any "doctor" who denies the importance of sexual dimorphism

since when did emotions and gynocentric/liberal ideologies became more valued than Cold rational Facts?

A guy with a 4 Inch length and 2 Inch girth penis will get terrified and socially belittled by almost every sexual Encounters, he might find a Woman for a Long term relationship were emotional and financial support primarily matters, but sexually wise he will never be a raw satisfaction, he will never be able to have truly satisfying ONS, he will be the typical long term relationship provider who's considered by over 30 women when their sexual wild years are over


No sex toys, creativity, communication or Position will ever be able to compensate for the lack of a well sized dimorphic human male penis

Thats literally just a meme created by the feministic 68s Generation who tried to make sex into a eloquent science

for hundred thousands of years humans relied on the typical Basic primitive in and out game during sex (of Course only strong men with a relatively large penis had Access to sex, weak unmasculine men were simply wiped out of the genepool), but now suddenly in the 20th century a Generation of "sexual experts" wants to tell us that Women's sexuality is far more than just Basic Penetration, and that women actually hate Basic vaginal sex because they are magical complex sexual beings who prefer a intuitive sensual romantic twink who can effectively hit her 230830248 errogenous spots over a strong primitive masculine man


But no no no, penis size and masculine dimorphism doesnt matter, every Woman is a lesbian anyways

It's About personality, humans especially women are complex individual beings who have a complex individual sexuality, women dont want brutish vaginal Penetration with a large thick penis, no no they want a feministic feminine man with a small penis who's totally fine in making himself to a submissive lesbian by only Performing oral sex

Women dont want to be dominated, it just happens so that 98% of women want a Partner who's taller then themselves teehee


Such Arguments are basically Nothing else than human narcissism in a nutshell, this whole "Sexual dimorphism does not matter women want nice Kind husbands" nonsense is just a direct proof that most humans on this earth totally lack self awareness

Claiming that women and men are both complex individuals, and that Basic primitive natural dimorphic traits dont matter since it's all About "Personality and communication"

We are one evolutionary stage higher than a caveman… And we still Claim that humans are non-primitive morally superior individual beings….


This here basically describes 95% of all modern urological/endocrinological "doctors"
image

TranscriptPhysician labelled “Dr. Cuck”: “Trust me, it's totally normal to have a 16 inch bideltoid as a full grown male along with a 3 inch penis and peanut sized testicles. My junk and boy is also not bigger but my wife still loves me We hadnt had sex since 5 years but thats ok since tyrone does a better job than me anyways

And stay away from that toxic testosterone (BTW if you want some estrogen I can quickly prescribe it to you)”

btw if you want to get some urological and sexual Facts from A REAL RATIONAL BASED urologist/andrologist then visit the Website of the austrian urologist"Dr Georg Pfau" he's an extremely based doctors who doesnt care About liberalistic or feministic Moral constructs but only About Cold rational facts

CH #fundie heartiste.wordpress.com

The goal of feminism is thus the destruction of the feminine in women and of the masculine in men. Feminism as an ideology seeks the annulment of sex-based distinctions and dichotomy, to be replaced by an androgynous slop that vulgarizes women and enfeebles men, and is at its heart dehumanizing.

Brief historical aside: The origin of American feminism as an organizing principle goes back to the 19th century, although there were rare, individual (European) women who lived well before then authoring proto-feminist books, and probably not coincidentally, these women were usually ugly and/or forced by circumstance to provide for themselves.

...

As the wealth disparity between the mass of beta male providers and the fat cats grew, women began to feel insecure that marriage to the average joe would save them from a life of penury. It was from this seed that the feminist “careergrrl” movement germinated, and it was this seed that the proto-globalist cosmopolitan fat cats wanted so eagerly to plant, to enlarge their customer base and divide families against themselves.

Whatever righteousness there could be found in the ideology’s original intent, feminism regressed rapidly (in nation-state life-cycle times) to a twisted, brutish, stupid dogma, that today has reached its inevitable nadir in campus rape hoaxes, Title IX, and fat acceptance, among many other bizarro world feminist social incursions that blatantly defy human nature. Inevitable, because as with all leftist missions, satisfaction from earlier victories only encourages more bloodlust, and the course of conquest always ends in desolation when the last enemy of the movement has been picked clean to the bone.

So we have as explanations for the rise of feminism affluence, wealth and income inequality, and decadence. To this we can add out-breeding, the marriage pattern among White Europeans (and, later, Americans) that split cousin-marriage kinship ties and created evolutionary selection pressures leading to a people with a high degree of trust and out-group altruism. Taken to extremes, this characteristic feature of Whites, genetically embedded for maximum staying power, promotes the beliefs and consequent social policies of “gender egalitarianism”, which is nothing less than the total rebuke of the existence of natural, organic, and psychologically healthy sex-based differences in mind and body.

Feminism is lies, ugliness, and malevolence, and that is why it must be opposed by any shiv necessary.

Markus #fundie topix.com

well Adam was meant for eve and he made women for men so they can reproduce kids and with gays going around fucking each other in da culo its slowing down reproduction, reproduction and taking care of your offspring is da main part of life. im jus tellin the truth like it is. but go on do what u like go on and screw someone in da culo and get aids for all i care. God made aids for a reason its more effective on gays than straight ppl thats why he made women for men cuz women r compatible with men and they can reproduce, gays and lesbians can't. if u r using lesbianism and gayness to dodge reproducing than u r one fucked up person. and ur a disgrace to all humans around the world if u r like dat yea i admit i have a lesbian cousin in my family i dont hate i jus dislike her its a long story but yea i dont hate gays and lesbians i jus dislike dem.

Noah Gulliver #sexist everyjoe.com

9 Reasons Why a Man Should Never Go Down on a Woman

In today’s society, men have to deal with many unwritten expectations when in a relationship with a woman. One such expectation is to perform cunnilingus on the woman’s whim. However, I’m here to tell you that mindset is a mistake. In fact, men should never perform oral sex.

After you pick your jaws off the ground, hear me out; I realize this goes against everything you’ve heard — but once you review all the evidence, I guarantee you will agree with me.

Ready for you mind to be blown? Here is why a man must avoid cunnilingus at all costs — click “Next” to see all nine reasons:

[First four points are about possible infections]

5. Other Men's Matter Remains in the Vagina Indefinitely

When a man has sex with a woman, his biological material stays within a woman's vagina -- even if a condom is used. While the vagina is self-cleaning, the process to completely cleanse can take months. Do you really want another man's biological material in your mouth? And even if you think you're in a committed relationship, by the time you find out your woman is cheating on you, it'll be too late.

6. The Vagina is Desensitized to Penis Centric Sex

Even if you're a master swordsman, your penis can't compete with your tongue in terms of creating clitoral stimulation. Why? The amount of stimulation cunnilingus provides is unnatural. Think about it: If the clitoris was meant to receive that much direct stimulation, Mother Nature would have placed it within the vaginal walls instead of on the periphery.

7. Women Will Fall in Love for a Fleeting Reason

A recent study points to the fact that men feel the need to perform oral sex on a woman in an attempt to keep the woman from straying. And while this strategy may be successful in the short-term, it will ultimately end up being a failure. If a woman falls in love with your tongue, it's only a matter of time before she falls out of love with you. Thus, it's better to find a female who loves you for a sustainable reason -- such as your mind or your penis.

8. Dominance in the Relationship Will Be Lost

A successful relationship between a man and a woman features the man in the dominant role. That dominance is lost the moment a male gets on his knees to bow before his female and perform oral sex.

9. Cunnilingus is a Gateway Drug to Lesbianism

Even if a male reaches the peak of his ability at the art of cunnilingus, he can't compete with the intimate knowledge a female mind provides when engaging in this activity. Thus, if a woman truly loves oral sex, she will eventually find herself in the arms of a lesbian. Think of cunnilingus as being comparable to marijuana and lesbianism being comparable to hardcore drugs such as heroin and crack. This gateway is best to be avoided.

I hope you men join me in abstaining from cunnilingus. Together we can make a difference and put an end to this unhygienic, emasculating practice.

sleazygirlapproacher #sexist #crackpot reddit.com

sleazygirlapproacher:
A woman's CADAVER is the first sign of interest for me, that's not to say I won't get to like her. And "why go for hot women" I go for women I find attractive, that's what a man does. Who's to say an UNATTRACTIVE woman would have more in common with me, than an attractive one?

There ARE lines between genders, btw. The two genders are about as different as can be, whilst being in the same species.

Females are very different to men, not socially, but biologically and that is why there will always be natural gender roles.

very_big_books:
Okay so you clearly don't have any awareness of gender and women. You just showed to everybody why women don't want you. Gender roles are bullshit. Internal differences btw the genders are imaginary and arbitrary as they have changed over the last centuries to represent vastly different norms and expectations, not to mention the variations within cultures of the same era. Read a history book.

Can you imagine having a chat with a woman that doesn't lead to you fucking her? I said to you that you need to engage with women without the goal of getting them naked first before you can actually be seen as someone who is worthwhile. Women do actually have thoughts, ambitions and feelings. If you can't accept that, you really have answered your own questions. Grow some self awareness. Seek therapy. Have a conversation with a woman without calling her a "female" or else live alone and unloved. Your call.

sleazygirlapproacher:
"Gender roles are bullshit." Women aren't hunters, they are nurturers. Men hunt. Women nurture. That is hardcoded in DNA. You can't escape that, no matter how much feminist mental gymnastics you engage in. Men are programmed to act, women are designed to be acted up on. Which is why all of this feminism is making it impossible for men to interact with women.

"Can you imagine having a chat with a woman that doesn't lead to you fucking her?"

I've gone 30 years with barely talking to women, of course I can. I wouldn't even know how to get to fucking her, that's the problem and the source of my rage.

I can't relate to feminine energy.

very_big_books:
I don't know what century you live in. Women are not "designed". Why is it all easy for normal ppl? Why have I never had an issue talking to men on an equal level? Or acting on my own without relying on a man to fix things for me? I've lived alone for the last six years and can easily fix a vaccuum cleaner or attach a shower curtain. You aren't special for having a penis. My vagina doesn't make me a senseless object to be "acted upon". You fail at the most basic level. You don't know the first thing about women and it shows. Engage with one. Talk to her. Listen to her. Don't move in with your bullshit that no educated person would ever believe in.

Most men have a very easy time talking to women. I've only met one dude like you who couldn't look me in the eyes without starting to tell me how inferior I am to him and how much he resents all """females""" for being shitty to men and guess what, he is also an incel. Maybe stop acting like an incel to stop being an incel. You are being provided with solutions to your problem yet you are too stubborn to see them.

sleazygirlapproacher:
If it came down to survival, it is YOU who would be failing at the most basic level, begging a MAN to take you under his wing.

Your biological programming is not suited to finding solutions to problems, I'm not putting you down, it's simply a fact. I've attended approaching women on the street and it never goes well. I've even recorded the reactions I get, to prove my theory.

If it wasn't for my testosterone making me want to do things to a woman's body, I wouldn't be interested in them in the first place.

At the end of the day, all women go for in a men is LOOKS. This is enabled by society, allowing her to chase chad.

If society fell away, women would quickly attach themselves to the most useful man in close proximity, like the leeches they are.

Lavendercelt #sexist stormfront.org

It is designed to destroy families. Extreme feminist philosophy wants to destroy the nuclear family and make women like men. Hardcore extreme feminists want to move toward genderlessness. Its important to realize that hardcore feminism is driven by lesbianism. The hatred of men and children, and the adoration of that national blood orgy that is abortion is what drives them. It just my opinion, but feminism is driven by women who are mentally ill and feel so personally slighted that anything that is denied to them is a denial of their "rights."

Most women (at least most of the women I know) are pretty much normal, love their husbands and families, etc, and just live their lives. Feminist philosophy means little to them, and when the averag woman comes face to face with what feminism really is, they abhor it. Its not normal. The problem is that these feminists have co-opted the right to speak for all women and they don't.

Patrick Scrivener #conspiracy reformation.org

Eleanor of Aquitaine was the real founder of the Islamic Plantagenet dynasty. She was the British counterpart of Kadijah—the real founder of the Mohammedan religion.

In 595, 25-year-old Mohammed married 40-year-old Khadijah bint Khuwaylid. Khadijah is a Hebrew name and it means "trust in JAHOVAH."

In 1152, 30-year-old Eleanor of Aquitaine married 19-year-old Henry Plantagenet.

Khadijah was the real founder of the Mohammedan dynasty, and Eleanor was the real founder of the Islamic Plantagenet dynasty.

The TWIN dynasties feature mother goddess worship: Hathor, Isis, Venus, Aphrodite, Diana, "Virgin Mary,"etc., etc., etc.

Khadilah interpreted the visions that her husband was having while undergoing his epileptic fits. Since Mohammed was illiterate, she wrote them down and they later became the Koran. By claiming that the work of Baalzebub was the work of the Holy Spirit, they both committed the unpardonable sin (Matthew 12:31, Mark 3:28).

Sicily was invaded by the Muslims in 827 and was thoroughly Muslim by 1190.

On his way to the Third Crusade in 1190, King Richard I was visited by the monk Joachim of Fiore, who expounded his "prophecies" of the Third Era of the "Holy Spirit."

King Richard was delighted with his "prophecies," as they were definitely on the same page.

Here is a report on that historic meeting by an "expert" on Joachim of Fiore:

Joachim made a dramatic impact on some of his contemporaries. The most famous encounter occurred in the winter of 1190/1 at Messina, where Richard Coeur de Lion, en route for the Third Crusade, asked to see the Abbot Joachim. So Joachim was fetched down from the mountains of Calabria to stand in the eager and curious circle of English courtiers, including Roger Howden whose first account of the meeting we have under the name of Benedict of Peterborough, as well as his later revised one. (Reeves, Joachim of Fiore and the Prophetic Future, p. 22).

The king spent days conferring with the monk about the great prophecies in the Book of Daniel and the Apocalypse. The king was especially interested in his interpretation of the numbers 1260, 1290, and 1335 found in Daniel 12: 7-12.

King Richard adopted the Knights Templar Red Cross during the Third Crusade.

That emblem became the official flag of the British Islamic Empire.

During the Crusade, Richard became a "war hero" or "Lionheart" by working closely with his good friend Sultan Saladin.

[...]

Saudi Arabia was founded by the British Islamic Empire!!

Arabia was the original home of Khadijah and Mohammed, so the British Islamic Empire was responsible for returning the HQ of the mother goddess religion to its original birthplace.

The Terrible Turks went down to defeat with Hajji Wilhelm and imperial Germany.

From the Fall of Constantinople in 1453 to that time, Istanbul was the HQ of the Muslim Caliphate.

A power vacuum ensued in the Mideast, and the British were able to install their puppet as king of Arabia. His name was Abdulaziz bin Abdul Rahman, commonly known as Ibn Saud.

As the Catholics make pilgrimages to Roma, Canterbury Cathedral, Lourdes and Fatima, Muslims are encouraged to make a pilgrimage to Mecca at least once in their lifetime.

A person who makes that pilgrimage is given the honorary title Hajji. Ownership of Arabia and Mecca is a tremendous cash cow for the British Islamic Empire . . . and the Saudis.

Muslims circle the Kaaba 7 times and they are expected to kiss the Black Stone in honor of Khadijah and the mother goddess.

Even though Saudi Arabia is British owned, the Arabian American Oil Company (ARAMCO) pumps most of the oil.

The billions in oil revenue goes to spread the Islamic religion around the world.

Prior to 1973, oil was only $3.00 per barrel. After the Arab-Edomite War, the price per barrel skyrocketed, and this was a great boon to financing the spread of Islam.

Hitler's Third Reich was based on Joachim of Fiore's Third Age of the "Holy Spirit"

It is beyond belief but the Third Reich was looked upon as the fulfillment of the Third Age of the failed "prophecies" of Joachim. The writings of Joachim were suppressed but they were adopted by the Jesuits when they supplanted the Franciscans.

Winston Churchill played the role of King Henry III of England, and cousin Adolf played the role of Sultan Frederick II.

Pugnacious Pope Pius XII played the role of Pope Gregory IX.

A Nazi victory would have made the entire world Muslim in order to fulfill the "prophecies" of Joachim of Fiore.

After the defeat of Germany in WWI, that country was broke. In addition, they were forced to pay reparations to France. In 1913, President Woodrow Wolfson appointed Edomite Henry Morgenthau ambassador to Turkey. Morgenthau had 2 Armenian assistants who were constantly briefing him on the Turkish Armenian Genocide. Edomite Morgenthau resigned in 1916 and wrote a book about the genuine Holocaust of 1,300,000 Armenian Christians.

Edomite Muslim Henry Morgenthau, Sr. was U.S. ambassador to Turkey from 1913 to 1916.

He wrote a famous book about the Armenian Holocaust.

His son, Henry Jr., used the gold confiscated by President Roosevelt to finance the Third Reich.

Executive Order 6103, signed by President Roosevelt in 1933, ordered the confiscation of all private gold at $20.67 an ounce. The next year gold was revalued at $35.00 an ounce. It was called the Great Gold Robbery of 1933. It was the greatest gold theft since Cortés and Pizarro.

Amin al-Husseini played the role of Sultan Malik al-Kamil, and he was Churchill's liaison with the Muslim world.

In 1941, he visited Queen Victoria's other grandson in Berlin.

Both men were still very confident of a Nazi victory and a future worldwide Islamic Caliphate.

At the most crucial moment in WWII, when the Nazis were outside the gates of Moscow, al-Husseini visited Adolf Pasha in Berlin. Both men were still very confident of a Nazi victory.

Gestapo chief Heinrich Himmler played the role of Dominican friar and Inquisition head Dominic de Guzmán, aka "Saint Dominic."

The meeting of al-Husseini and Himmler took place in Ukraine on July 4, 1943.

After the meeting, al-Husseini went to Bosnia-Hercegovina
to recruit Muslim cannon fodder for the Waffen-SS.

By July 1943, the war was going badly for the Nazis, so the 2 men discussed the necessity of the creation of a "Jewish" state in the Mideast. According to al-Husseini, Himmler told him that his boss had just killed 3 million "Jews." Obviously, Field Marshall Erich von Manstein was not one of them.

It was at that meeting that the 2 men conceived the idea of the Holohoax. "Holocaust" comes from the Latin Vulgate Version and it means a sacrifice or burnt offering.

Our Great JEHOVAH promised that "the gates of Hades would not prevail" (St. Matthew 16:18). It was the mighty Soviet Union—at the cost of over 20 million casualties—that saved Christian civilization from the nightmarish British Islamic Empire.

Coke #fundie news.yahoo.com

This stealth war on heterosexuals (disguised as woman's and gay rights) is designed to destabilize society in advance of the New World Order. The destruction of the nuclear family has long been the Illuminati Communist goal. They wish to make arrested development (homosexuality) the new norm. Lesbianism is the hidden agenda of feminism. Marriage and family are essential to our natural development. But, despite the deceitful propaganda, most male homosexuals don't want marriage or children. They want sex.

See this 1969 document from Rockefeller-funded "Planned Parenthood" which plots to promote homosexuality and feminism so as to decrease US fertility. (Berelson-Jaffe Chart)

Because promoting homosexuality is the elite Agenda, the research on same-sex parenting is highly politicized. Thus, we have numerous nonsensical claims that homosexual parenting is as good for the child or better than a stable heterosexual marriage.

Here is a study that actually claims that more than half of gay men want to have children! It says that in 2007, an estimated two million GLB people were interested in adopting. An estimated 65,500 adopted children were living with a lesbian or gay parent. More than 16,000 adopted children are living with lesbian and gay parents in California, the highest number among the states. Gay and lesbian parents are raising four percent of all adopted children in the United States. 

The most common type of same sex parenting is by two lesbians. Dr. Dean Byrd, a psychiatrist testified that the "research clearly demonstrated that lesbian mothers had a feminizing effect on their sons and a masculinizing effect on their daughters. Boys raised by lesbian mothers behaved in less traditionally masculine ways, and girls, particularly adolescent and young girls raised by lesbian mothers, appear to have been more sexually adventurous and less chaste."

Dr. Byrd continued, "Children learn about male and female differences through parental modeling. The parental, mother-father relationship provides children with a model of marriage--the most meaningful, enduring relationship that the vast majority of individuals will have during their lives."

Girls need their father's approval to affirm their femininity and to eventually establish a bond with a man. Boys also need their father's example to grow into strong independent men capable of leading families. All of this, the Bolshevik Masonic globalists are out to sabotage. There is well documented evidence of the spiritual bond between Mother and Child, that when broken, shortly after birth, it greatly effects the child's spiritual development

CH #sexist heartiste.wordpress.com

It’s just more evidence that feminism has been, and continues to be, a Hate Machine dedicated to churning out Big Lies about the sexes and about their roles in society, with the express purpose of handicapping boys and men and lavishing extreme favoritism and government largesse on girls and women.

It’s silly to argue feminism is a symptom, rather than a cause, of a broken society when its agenda has directly contributed to so much social disruption, antagonism, distrust, resentment, and national decline. This is like arguing Marxism, Freudianism, Communism, SCALE, and GloboHomoism are symptoms of some deeper, underlying, corrupting force that bedevils the West. Large, society-spanning movements are as much cause as symptom of social degeneration. We’re splitting vellus hairs here.

If one wants to argue for a First Cause of the West’s decline, the most promising culprit would be Hajnalianism, but for some reason those who find SCALE objectionable rarely tackle the subject of inherited empathobesity.

Feminism as a distinctive movement really got started as a vanity project of masculinized or otherwise oddball women [link to Wikipedia article on Mary Wollstonecraft] who were for various reasons uncomfortable in the world of women. Its leaders — and one shouldn’t neglect to mention the preponderance of feminist leaders were and are Jewish women and their co-tribal male suckups — were able to leverage their gripes to a wider audience of women who had become frustrated and flustered and, in plenty of cases, enthused, by the postindustrial revolution shocks to the social system that, critically, severed fecundity from sex and community from individual.

There was never a feminist movement that had its origins in widespread complaints about male discrimination against working women. That is a myth. Pre-20th Century Western women worked plenty, either on the home or off it. Wives working as apprentices to their husbands’ businesses was fairly common in Medieval Europe.

What feminism has been, and what it remains today, is a propaganda howitzer to mow down the natural order and replace it with an inverted dystopia in which the defining feature is the removal of all constraints on female sexuality and the maximization of restrictions on male sexuality. As in any social movement, the breath of its life emerges first from the sticky goo of the sexual market.

Lies have consequences, and the Big Lies of Feminism and Antiracism have destroyer-of-worlds consequences. They must be fought with a vengeance.

W. F. Price #sexist web.archive.org

Wednesday’s post about how people (and women in particular) are wasting time, often while pursuing futile goals, has brought up some discussion of the origins of feminism in recent comments. There’s something very cult-like about the way feminism has emerged as a mass movement, and this characteristic has given rise to a lot of speculation about who was responsible for really getting it off the ground. Some have suggested Communists and the Frankfurt School, and others Victorian politics. There are a lot of theories, but what’s undeniable is that it burst onto the world scene in a big way in the mid-20th century.

Before this, I suspect there had always been various proto-feminist movements of one sort or another. From fertility cults in the ancient world, which survive today in Asia and perhaps parts of Africa, to the proliferation of witchcraft in late medieval Europe and then the political feminism that emerged in early 19th century Britain in response to the French Revolution’s ideals of equality.

I think feminism in one form or another has always been with us, and has always been part of the human experience. Even male feminists have always existed. There have been certain men from time immemorial who, despising their fellow men, maintain a worshipful attitude toward the feminine. But it has never been much more than a nuisance, or perhaps at worst an underground criminal industry, as in the abortionists that were prosecuted in Europe following the population depletion that accompanied the plague.

One rather remarkable passage from Alonso de Salazar Frías, a Spanish inquisitor who recommended that witches not be executed because they were not actually doing much, but rather simply delusional, highlights some of the similarities between modern feminist wishful thinking and the claims of witches, which were fantastic accounts of being able to do pretty much anything:

The real question is: are we to believe that witchcraft occurred in a given situation simply because of what the witches claim? No: it is clear that the witches are not to be believed, and the judges should not pass sentence on anyone, unless the case can be proven with external and objective evidence sufficient to convince everyone who hears it. And who can accept the following: that a person can frequently fly through the air and travel a hundred leagues in an hour; that a woman can get through a space not big enough for a fly; that a person can make himself invisible; that he can be in a river or the open sea and not get wet; or that he can be in bed at the sabbath at the same time… and that a witch can turn herself into any shape she fancies, be it housefly or raven? Indeed, these claims go beyond all human reason and may even pass the limits permitted by the Devil.

So what is it that turned feminism from a mere annoyance into a widespread, powerful cult that is supported by none other than the President of the United States and other leaders throughout the West?

I suspect the answer has something to do with mass communication and mob psychology. In the past, feminism or other odd, associated cults would emerge in some region, but would remain contained therein. Because it isn’t a proper religion that moves men to fight and sacrifice themselves, it was never in any danger of sweeping into power on a broad scale. It seems to me to be no coincidence at all that the rise of feminism coincided with television, mass-marketing and consumerism, because when the quirks of female psychology could be manipulated and fostered for profit or power on a widespread scale, it suddenly became a force in its own right.

There’s a great documentary – actually, the best I’ve ever seen – that documents the rise of mass psychology and the various methods people use to manipulate it for power and or profit. I’m sure a number of readers have seen it, but it’s worth mentioning “The Century of the Self” again, because it goes into great detail about the communication and psychological trends that have shaped contemporary society. Evidently, Freud was a real pioneer in this area, although he himself didn’t put his ideas into practice; his nephew did.

Lyn Marcus #fundie laroucheplanet.info

The witch image is the associated quality of the female Ego otherwise identified with female sexual impotence and its correlated forms of social impotence generally. Hence, the clinical significance of the acronym, WITCH, for the cited radical feminist group. Such variety of “radical feminism,” as distinct from its sane bitter factional opponent, Women's Liberation efforts, is essentially an outbreak of the most pathetic, most sadistic form of lesbianism. The method of indoctrination used by groups such as WITCH, so-called “consciousness-raising” sessions, were undoubtedly a modern replication of ancient “Witch meetings,” and represented the accidentally-discovered but not otherwise accidental most efficient means for turning a merely intensely neurotic young woman into a virtual psychotic.

Through social “reenforcement” in the group, the new victim is induced to call up the witch within her, and then to relinquish defenses against a more direct take-over by that image. The result of this, where it were successfully accomplished, would be a form of disassociation identical in key respects to a schizophrenic episode. Even the ordinary Ego “I” is weakened and the “I” of the outwardly-acting person is placed under intensified, more direct control of the witch called forth from the (Breughel's Bosch's Goya's) pit of unconscious processes. A woman reduced to this psychotic state, must tend to become a prostitute, a lesbian, or both. Although there is generally a necessary connection between the control of the Ego by a witch and lesbianism, and although prostitutes are generally lesbians who depend upon calling up witch qualities as the prerequisites of their professional practice. The special kind of lesbianism developed in radical-feminist “conscious-raising” forcing sessions is not to be simply equated with the ordinary case of lesbian behavior. The radical-feminism-produced lesbian is a special category of virtual psychotic, a synthetic product of a “brain-washing” technique which essentially reverses the psychoanalytical method.

ANDY DAVIDSON #fundie youtube.com

WHY DO PPLE WHO DONT HAVE ANY FORM OF DESIRE TO KNOW TRUTH EVEN WASTE THIER TIME PRESSIN D BUTTON TO GO ON THIS SITE TO CRITISIZE. it takes more faith to believe in evolution than creation. b4 i hated church an pple with bible. pple who bash this i bet 90 PER CENT of them have never opened a bible for themselves sad. dont waste ur time looking if u dont believe that jus makes u look more stupid. poor things.?

bitchywitchshitblr #fundie bitchywitchshitblr.tumblr.com

BIG ASS GROUP CURSE
okay, so im telling some guy i know about tumblr and the like witchcraft community, and he was like “oh they sound funny im gonna make a tumblr account just to piss them people off” so obviously i was like mate. they gonna curse your ass to hell if you piss them off HE AINT BELIEVING THAT THIS SHIT IS REAL.
“oh yehhhh im so scared of a bunch of girls waving wands around in a circle”
he best stop his sarcasm coz we could actually do some big ass group curse that like messes up his internet or some shit.

update: im now going to do some spell writing. i want to make something that affects people on the internet. you know, messes with wifi or crashes theeir devices. thought it could be perfect for cyberbully victims

UninspiredGuy1 #sexist incels.co

[Blackpill] The only point of life is to fuck girls with nice fat asses. Everything else is cope.

Everything we should do in life should be to obtain sex with a big booty girl.

sadly only chad can get this.

mostly agree

Birthing hips and curvy spine is all i care about, yet i cannot have this.

(((someone))) thought it was funny for men to live like this in the 2000s

Technology has absolutely destroyed the sexual market

I'm okay with a small ass

Jfl if u dont like jiggly ass and prefer disgusting sticks

You can easily get by without friends altogether if you fuck tons of foids 24/7 but even with hundreds of the most faithful friends you still cant live without foid affection and sex.

100% the truth i could less of a fuck of what giys think of me and hanging out with dudes

its just a dream at this point, only 8/10 and above chads can obtain that

Just kill me now if i cant eat some hot foids ass and fuck it all day long

Tits > ass.

So wrong

Grizzly_Clout #racist reddit.com

Why is there no "no marriage trend" for Africans ? They breed like rats and should stop breeding rn

Imagine hating races but joining a forum because women hate you.

Who the fuck are you, a genetic-deadend, to say who deserves to breed or not when you won't be breeding yourself?

Having said that, I knew a few Africans and they have 3 children minimum. So you're not wrong about their fertility rates. And some of their behaviours aren't good.

Why dont you go and live in Congo then instead of the US? I'm sure it must great there.

Africa has a birth rate of 7 same as rats. They should breeding right now. The world can't handle so many low IQ people

Stomfrontcels mad kek, being a blackcel it makes me so satisfied seeing you guys reeeeee.

I'm not white so stfu

White worshipping is worse .

How is that a white worship ? I didn't even mention white people in my first comment. The less the Africans the better for the world it is.

Stormfrontcels btfo

I'm not white so how am I stormfront ? Low IQ response as I expected

Mostly because I can tell you believe in a racial hierarchy, and don't understand every nation goes through a low iq phase to which they change from industrial revolution to focusing on smarts. China, India good examples of this. You are a stromfrontcel.

IQ is not adopted with time, its genetic just like your muscular facial structure etc. If low IQ phase argument was correct, black people living in white countries would have high IQ but guess what they dont so dont pull this bullshit "wE aRe aLl sAmE". Asians from poor countries like Vietnam Cambodia do much better than blacks living in the USA.

And no I'm persian so fuck stormfront and fuck alt right

Have you even seen Nigeria? Also. Black people living in white countries iqs have been going up with modern education for many years, it's why I'm alot smarter then my mother was, and why my kids will be even smarter. Just because I'm black doesn't make me default low iq lmfao. Jesus your stomfrontcel tendencies are showing. every country goes through an industrial age where Iq isn't as valued dumb ass. Imagine thinking just because your country is ahead in terms of modernism. Means the whole country was just genetically born like that, and that every other country doesn't eventually catch up.

Look man wakanda isnt real and neither is your argument.

No matter what countries blacks live in they are all the same and have same behaviours be it Africa be it Caribbean be it the USA or be the rapefugees in Europe. Also why do you think countries develop? Why hasn't Africa developed yet ? Poverty has nothing to do with IQ level. I saw a documentary of Indian children from slums who had higher IQ despite living in extreme poverty. So is the case with Vietnam Cambodia Myanmar etc. Those countries are piss poor and guess what they do much much better.

I'm of Persian ancestry currently living in Oregon and this Asian kid from Vietnam used to be a top scorer despite being the first generation immigrant form the poor country while the blacks always used to be at the bottom despite living in the states from 100s of years

I'm Persian and not white so dont call me stormfront. Reality can appear racist sometimes. You're behaving like those foids who when they run out of arguments call you a racist incel nazi lmao stop coping man

Kek imagine thinking just because you haven't studied the statistics and trends, means that suddenly I'm wrong and I'm coping with "Wakanda". Dude, you obviously feel superior because you are ahead in terms of modernism, America felt the same before they saw China come from low iq farmers to now on the brink of ruling the world in the span in as little as 40 years. Study up on the industrial revolution, and how this shit works bro, I noticed you had nothing to respond to my Nigeria thing, because you understand modernism varies by country. But muh wakanda, I'm so superior wahhh. Kek, hope that superior facade helps you cope with the fact your superior race rejected your genetics.

“NIGERIA.”

the whole country is under the influence of Chinese and Indian companies. Every single infrastructure and companies are owned by them. Meanwhile Nigerian women are busy producing 7 kids each.

“Chinese low IQ farmers.”

More like poor farmers. Chinese people were never low IQ. They had great ancient civilization and various dynasties invented and created so many things in the past. Even after getting massacred by the Japanese in world wars dealing with extreme poverty, there were cases of poor Chinese kids of doing good at math and science. They were just piss poor. The poor Chinese who migrated from China after world wars to the USA are nowhere doing as poor as the African Americans. In fact Chinese are the smartest.

“industrial revolution.”

Man stop coping. God didn't give those Europeans and Asian all the wealth they have today. They earned with their brains and hard work which Africans clearly lack and please dont blame colonialism for your misery cuz much of Asia was colonized too at some point of time. You Africans couldn't even manage the rails and roads given to you the colonials lmao.

And you haven't answered my question, why do Africans living in the USA are just as bad as their counterparts in Africa despite being in the states for 100s of years? According to your argument , blacks living in the USA should do much better but they dont

“colonialism, segregation and slavery.”

All of those were experienced by most countries in Asia and in a very extreme manner but media only highlights Africa. China was same as Africa when the world war ended. They were completely buttfucked by the japanese with massacre slavery and poverty. Didn't stop them from being one of the world's super power today.

Same goes with South Korea, they were absolutely fucked after the world wars and Korean wars , poverty was rampant but look at them today. India was colonized and looted by the British for 200 years and today they are sending satellites in Mars and moon

So what's stopping Africa from growing? It's clearly not the past and poverty like you guys like to cry... it's the IQ level.

It will stop once China finishes cucking them. In post-industrial societies birth rates plummet.

I seriously hope ricecels btfo these rapefugees from wakanda

Draconiss #homophobia #transphobia #kinkshaming removeddit.com

As a lesbian, I fucking HATE the gay community.

Even when I was growing up and coming out as a baby gay, ive always despised people who just HAD to make their sexuality the single facet of their personality. What happened to just loving people differently and moving on with your life? I used to be heavily involved in my schools gay community, and all we did was discuss shit in a safe place. How to come out, our worries, our anxieties, our issues.

Instead we get the mess that is pride. Instead of helping our community and continuing the tradition of activism, all we get is an excuse to party and shoving genitals BDSM and other fucked up fetishes down the throats of kids! There are still real issues facing us. Higher rates of drug addictions, homelessness and obesity. But no, all we want to do is fucking drink and go clubbing. I was talking to my coworker the other day and he said all he wanted was a Pride that he could bring his dad and kids too to show what were about. I had to point out that some people still do bring their kids! To have them see furry and leather suits that show wildly swinging peens. Disgusting.

God forbid you criticize anyone. You get labelled a self hating gay, and “unworthy” to wear the label. Well guess what? Im a lesbian loving pussy even if im not “woke”. Its like the SJWs on tumblr infiltrated the real world. Giant rainbow flags, dildo tents, and nudity, so much nudity. The straights are right, youre being fucking obnoxious. And when people are less approving of us, this is why. Its shit like this that makes people hate us. What weve become in this day and age isnt something to be celebrated.

Dont even get me started on how ive gotten banned from the largest lgbtq sub just for stating that as a lesbian, I dont like dick. A literal clown world where I have to not only state, but get banned for stating the obvious? What kind of twilight zone shit am I living in?

There was a time where being a part of the community meant something. Now its all abide by my political beliefs or get out. Where was the queer community that welcomed everyone regardless of what they believed in regardless of their belief, instead of this militant mess we have today? If you honestly believe someone deserves to be treated like shit because they have a different opinion than you, YOURE the one being intolerant, and perpetuating the very thing you claim to fight. But hurrdurr its different cause were oppressed. No, youre acting like a fucking asshole, fullstop. And playing the victim card to justify your hate is fucking revolting. This community is being divided, where the more sensible of us just want to fuck off and live our lives in peace while the vocal minority just keeps dragging our image through the gutter.

Racheli Reckles #fundie breslev.co.il

What I take issue with is what feminism has done to the woman. In my opinion, (again, I stress that this is only an opinion) feminism has taken away femininity from the woman. Let's start with looks: how many women do you know that actually dress like women? Most women these days wear jeans or shorts, plain t-shirts, and sneakers. I would guess that 99.9% of women wear pants at work. I'm not even talking about the lack of modesty- I'm just referring to the lack of femininity in women's looks today. There is a small percentage of women who do put on makeup and take the time to look attractive, but that in itself is a whole 'nother can of worms, and I'm not opening that up today. I'm not promoting the etiquette schools of the past, but I am wondering where our lady-likeness has gone.

Next issue: Behavior. Nowadays, women feel the need to compete with men in every area of life, including binge-drinking. If a woman can guzzle down a six-pack, the men around her will surely be quite impressed! Young women think nothing of being loud and rowdy in a restaurant or any public place. It is totally acceptable for everyone at Starbuck's to hear a girl describe every detail of her date the previous night to her girlfriends. What about sports? Aside from football, I don't know of any sport that women don't participate in. You might say that's great, but I don't see the point of women playing basketball. Be honest- do any of these ladies look lady-like? Even bodybuilding has its fair share of women. Do any of those bodybuilders even look like women anymore? I sure don't think so! They're more muscular than most men!

Third issue: Career. Here's where it gets really controversial. Let me start by saying that if a woman is in a financial position where she needs to work, no one can fault her for it. I'm not referring to these women. What I would like to call attention to is the women who choose to work. What influenced your decision, ladies? Was it something that was always expected of you? Sadly, most of us were trained to expect a glamorous work career at the end of our college career. Did anyone train us to primarily want to raise a family? [...] To me, it's no wonder why so many families are dysfunctional today. There are too many things pulling the parents apart, and women in the workplace is a big part of it. Not to mention all of the adultery going on! Cheating would be much less prevalent if women weren't working with men! [...] Yes, you might be a career woman with a comfortable income and a nice title after your name, but who's raising your children? The nanny or the television? Who is home to greet them with a smile and a hug when they walk in the door after school? as a result of spending so much time and effort at work, does your house feel like a home? Does it have that magical energy of warmth and love that only a woman can give it? Or is it a house that your family uses to eat and sleep in until life begins all over again the next day?

[...]

Ladies, I am aware that many of you might be upset and even angry with what I wrote. My intention is not to make anyone feel bad, only to present information that will cause you to question your ideals. Do you want to be a real feminist? Then take back your home! Take back your family! Go against what society forces you to believe in. Be a woman who thinks outside of the box. Real feminism is about being the most incredible woman you can be. It's not about trying to be as much like a man as possible. But if you think about it, that's what feminism is to most people. How ironic! If you're a feminist, that means you're trying to live your life like a man as much as possible! This is exactly the antithesis of feminism!

MasterAmazon #fundie dirtywhiteboi67.blogspot.com

I'd LOVE to go back to an all female college, like Mills, but I don't care to share that with either side of trans...and certainly not with those sporting beards, male attitudes and insisting on male pronouns. That has NOTHING to do with being Butch, and everything to do with copying men. When I came out the Butches were PROUD to be Female, Dykes, strong, liberated and most of all POWERFUL. Many had to overcome the shame of Lesbianism, until they hit the Lesbian movement, out of the bar scene where they no longer had to hate themselves...those lessons and the value of Lesbian only and women only space resonate with me today, and I'm glad to be going to two women's events, one strictly women only, the other female centered, this weekend!

The genderqueer and FTM's have done far more damage to women only space than anyone I've ever seen. The MTF's compromise it with their male attitudes and thinking, though they are desparately trying to pass as female, and 'fit in'. Some better than others...but the strident trans in either direction with the insistence of no female only bathrooms, sports teams, dorms, rooms, spaces or places, I have no use for....we STILL get discriminated against both as women, and as Lesbians, whether Butch or Femme. And Butches no longer have their very womonhood recognized...yet us Female Identified Butches are rising and taking back what is ours...

If you can't identify as FEMALE, then you DON'T BELONG IN WOMEN'S OR DYKE SPACES OR A WOMEN'S COLLEGE!

Julian Vigo #sexist feministcurrent.com

In an effort to move to a greener existence, I recently switched to an ecological toothbrush. As I have been living uniquely from solar panels for almost two years, I was forced to ditch my electric toothbrush. In choosing an ecological toothbrush, I studied materials, as well as the advantages of recycled plastic brushes versus those with replaceable heads. In the end, I had to eliminate every single option aside from the single one I chose. Yes, I had to exclude that which did not meet my personal standards and convenience.

I think a lot about exclusion these days. The #MeToo campaign which emerged in reaction to the sexually aggressive acts of Harvey Weinstein is clearly a female-centered campaign. But recently I’ve seen arguments that #MeToo should be extended to include males. While being “inclusive” of everyone might seem like a nice idea, the reality is that there are perfectly rational reasons for exclusivity in many situations. Our shared experiences with certain humans help us form bonds where and when we need them. These bonds can often make life bearable for those experiencing particularly painful moments in their lives. Commonalities help to create community. The truth is that all communities are exclusive, in one way or another, of individuals who don’t share certain experiences or requisites. While some might be tempted to argue exclusion equates to segregation, such arguments are very much apples and oranges, particularly in the context of women’s rights.

There are several key differences which should be underscored, when discussing “exclusion” in the women’s liberation movement, beginning with the myth that feminism must focus on males. Thanks to liberal feminists like Emma Watson, among others, many women have been made to believe that arguing for the inclusion of males in the women’s movement is a worthwhile cause. But any group in protest of its oppression by another group is within its rights to demand that the oppressor not be included in its organizing. For instance, when labour unions secured the legal right to represent employees in 1935, employers were excluded from the class of employees because it was understood that employers (as well as managers and supervisors) held power over workers. In terms of economic class, it seems that most people are on the same page when understanding which group holds power over another.

Similarly, civil rights advocacy began with the premise that there is social inequality between people of colour and white people, making a necessary distinction between who is being oppressed under white supremacy. Robbing a person of the right to distinguish the oppressor class means that she is barred from speaking about and identifying her oppression.

Nobody expected the Black Panthers to consider the marginalization of KKK members from their organization for good reason. Similarly, no such claim of exclusion was made about the Million Man March in Washington D.C. in 1995, when approximately 400,000 African American men converged en masse in the nation’s capital to engage in teach-ins, worship services, and community organizing. While there was a discussion over the fact that women were excluded, there was also recognition that black men had the right to gather without women to discuss their issues, and this action was largely supported by African American women. Two years later, the Million Woman March was held in D.C. to focus on issues specific to women.

This sort of exclusion is not based in hatred or a desire to do harm. Exclusion is how we decide, like me and my ecological toothbrush choices, what meets our needs. Exclusion is not necessarily about owning a card to an elite club — it is about setting a particular direction for an individual, group, activity, community, and so forth. All social groups exclude in some way. While I am a big believer in reaching over the aisle to dialogue with those responsible for our subordination, I also recognize the need of any group to make decisions within its group before reaching across that aisle.

(..)

Does the fact of breast cancer support groups for women mean that males cannot get breast cancer? Of course not. And there are breast cancer support groups for males. Why? Because males and females experience breast cancer differently. Commonalities between same-sexed bodies are part of the social intimacy that both males and females alike cherish across cultures. Be it in the hammam or the steam room, the hospital ward, or the changing room at the gym, there is intimacy between people of the same sex that provides a space of security and dignity. Females especially value these spaces because the public sphere is not safe for women. Being in a female-only changing room can offer women a needed reprieve from the daily sexualization of their bodies, and from unwanted male attention and judgment.

The issue of “exclusion” has become a touchpoint for the left in recent years. Most notably, we have seen exclusion being derided as bigotry in trans activist circles where women who say they would not feel comfortable with a male in their change rooms, their women’s shelters, or in a women’s prison are labelled transphobic. Yet both these examples come from real life paradigms. In 2007, Vancouver Rape Relief Society won a case against Kimberly Nixon, a trans-identified male who had attempted to join the training group for peer counsellors at the women’s shelter.

Nixon was asked to leave the group account of having been born male, and because the shelter operated on the basis that women could best counsel other women, having had the specific experience of growing up female under patriarchy. The B.C. Court of Appeals’ decided that Vancouver Rape Relief had the right to determine its own membership, as any oppressed group of people has the right to “discriminate” when organizing in their own interests, as a class. Currently pending in Texas is the case of three female inmates who are suing Federal Medical Center Carswell in Fort Worth, claiming that, “They are living in a degrading and dangerous environment by being forced to share showers and bathrooms with the transgender inmates.” The truth is that, for most women, sex does matter. What is more remarkable is that males who claim to have an internal “female identity” have zero compassion for or comprehension of the reality women face in a male supremacist world, and would prefer women put aside their own material reality, comfort, and safety in order to validate men’s feelings.

Choosing a female gynecologist or desiring a female-only space for changing is not meant to incriminate all males as, to paraphrase George W. Bush, “evil doers.” Rather, a woman might choose a female gynecologist both because she feels a woman would better understand her body, but also because she feels safer in that vulnerable state with someone statistically unlikely to assault them. Women’s desire to change in a locker room without male-bodied persons would likely be based on something similar, as well as a desire to maintain healthy boundaries that too often go unrespected. In excluding males from female spaces, women are demanding that society accept the healthy boundaries of women, even if, in certain scenarios, males might wish to be on the other side of the line.

Last week, Bustle ran a story arguing that “some members of LGBTQ community feel that the [#MeToo] campaign focuses too strongly on the gender binary and seems to erase nonbinary or genderqueer people from the conversation.” But what this statement really conveys is that males feel excluded from a conversation lead by women speaking out about male violence. While I would not deny that males experience violence, it is overwhelmingly violence inflicted by other males. What makes #MeToo important is that violence against women and girls is coded into the structural social hierarchy. When women contribute their #MeToo stories, they are doing so as females who have, from childhood, been groomed as objects that exist for male use.

It cannot be overstated that females suffer disproportionate levels of sex-based discrimination and violence, including sexual harassment, domestic violence, rape, and trafficking. Women are quite aware that they are discriminated against and physically abused because of their sex, regardless of how they may feel, internally, about the gender roles imposed on them. It is entirely insignificant, for example, how the over 200 women who James Toback sexually harassed identified. To demand that #MeToo include non-binary people is to miss the point of the feminist movement: feminism has from its inception been explicitly about breaking the hierarchy and stereotypes reinforced through gender which demanded women not leave the house, not vote, and not work. It is not the “binary” that is the problem so much as it is gender itself, under patriarchy. Men who rape women don’t care whether their victims feel “binary” or not.

What Bustle would like is for women to use a language that is seemingly more neutral, less politically objectionable, and more inclusive… of males. Otherwise there would be no uproar with focusing specifically on women’s voices and experiences in this campaign. Males insisting on being “included” in women’s social protest against sexism is just more of the same sexism — women are being instructed to shut up about their oppression by males unless they include males. Beyond that, under patriarchy, women are always under pressure to be sexually available to men. This new language of “inclusion” that frames “exclusion” as inherently harmful has led to males who identify as transgender to insist that women include them not only in their groups and politics, but in their beds. That this is explicitly sexist is made clear through the fact that I have yet to see any male who identifies as trans pressure heterosexual men into sleeping with him.

A narrative that insists on coercing or goading women into including their oppressor is anything but progressive. Likewise, insisting that the language of gender neutrality is what matters in a conversation about sexual violence is far from revolutionary. Taking up the five-cent terms like “non-binary” and “queer” will have no impact on the facts of sex-based oppression for females. The challenge we face as a society is not to carpet bomb women’s movements with accusations of “exclusivity” and “bigotry” when women recognize that males and females are different and have different needs. Creating linguistic games might seem avant-garde to undergraduates, but the reality is that gender is what prescribes the behavioral cues engrained in females throughout their lives. Gender is what is hammered into females as a class, rendering them subjects of a discourse they have no power to respond to. The notion that gender can ever be neutral is patently absurd since gender is not the solution. It is the problem.

Changing language to be “be more inclusive” is counter-revolutionary and pretending that such language does anything other prevent women from effectively organizing towards their own liberation is delusory. The language of gender inclusivity does nothing to dismantle the social and political inequalities that females face. It does, however, create a lovely illusion (especially for men who want to seem progressive in their attempts to thwart our movement): that saying “genderqueer” makes one a “feminist.”

Stryker1488 #racist stormfront.org

And that is very intelligent, though there are some corrections. And you are finally getting warm as to the reason why the Jews/Asiatics have a control on Whites since ancient times.

The Jews are Caucasoid Asians from West Asia (Middle-East). The Semites actually split off from the Cro-Magnon/Old Europeans Caucasoids 35,000 ya in West Asia. All Caucasoids originated in the Middle-East/West Asia or Asia side of Caucasus mountains 45,000 ya and migrated from there.

And its not the Ice Giants, its The SERPENT - Tiamat aka Chaos Serpent/Monster later known as Satan/Devil/Lucifer. Yawheh/Jesus defeats the Serpent/Satan in the Final Battle/Armageddon or Thor slays Jörmungandr the Serpent at the Final Battle/Ragnarok.

It can also be scientifically interpreted i.e. Cosmology - primordial chaos at the Big Bang becoming ordered into the Universe....though the chaos still persists in subtle, dangerous & still unknown ways....until its totally eradicated in future.

This is not the religious forums, but anyway in brief:

And all Asian religions - both Semitic-Abrahamic (Judaism/Christianity/Islam) & Indo-European (Hinduism/Buddhist philosophy) - worship the same God - Yahweh/Allah/Brahman - The One, despite many external differences.


Hear O'Israel the Lord our God is One - Bible

In the beginning Brahman who is One without a second alone existed. When darkness was rolling over darkness there was Existence only - Rig Veda


The Asian Semitic/Abrahamic religions have the flood, tree of life, serpent, etc and also the Asian Indo-European Hindu religions. Its present also in the European Indo-European religions like Greek/Norse/Germanic, plus other commonalities. And note that the Trinity also appears in the Christian, Hindu, Egyptian, Greek/Roman religion as well - Jupiter (Zeus), Juno, and Minerva. That means they have a common origin even earlier with the first Caucasians who originated in West Asia and its at least 35,000 years old & in fact are all actually the same religions in different forms & interpretations.

Thus one main point of various interpretations of these religions is God who is a Monotheistic "One" [Judaism/Islam] that splits into a Trinity [Christianity/Hinduism] and into even further polytheistic 333 million forms [Hinduism & other Indo-European religions]. Tao & Shinto, the Mongoloid religions also have relations to these.

The other important factor is whether girls & women should be suppressed (Patriarchal societies) or liberated
(Matriarchal societies). Out of the Caucasoids the Semites are very strongly Patriarchal & harshly suppress girls/women The original Aryans were also strongly Patriarchal & suppressed girls/women, but after invading Europe, merging with the Cro-Magnon/Old Europeans (Matriarchal) & becoming Christian, they became more liberal towards women.

However the Aryans in Asia (Persians, Indians, North Indians, Pakkis, Afghans) are still strongly Patriarchal & suppress women. Dravidians (South Indians) are the only Matriarchal society in Asia who are more liberal with females. Hamites (Ancieent Egyptians, Berbers) & Mediterraneans were also Patriarchies. Virtually all the East Asian (Chinese, Japanese, Korean) & other Mongoloid societies in Asia are strongly Patriarchal. Most Negroid societies are also Patriarchal.

The main ambition of the Jews & other Asiatics is to introduce their barbaric, misogynist, Asiatic Patriarchal societies into White countries as they have been trying for the past 1000s of years.

Thus you cannot say Jews alone are the sole chosen people, even though they have many important points in the Bible, as other Caucasoids - the Aryans, Old Europeans, Dravidians, Mediterraneans & Hamites also interpreted the same religion in different ways. But everyone has also unfortunately made huge mistakes while interpreting them and thus its obvious that final destruction is quite close. Its all a very intricate & complex web spanning tens of thousands of years.

The Jews/Semites/West Asians had some excellent points in the Bible like the Creation story & the Ten commandments. However they misinterpreted & messed it up & have been fooling God for the past thousands of years. The original Indo-Eurpeans/Aryans who migrated from South/Central Asia to Europe via the Pontic Caspian Steppes, also had some great points in the Indo-European religions (that later gave rise to Hinduism & Buddhism) - however they also ruined it. Its too late to rectify I think, thus Armageddon/Ragnarok is now inevitable.

Theodore Shoebat #conspiracy rightwingwatch.org

Radical anti-LGBTQ activist Theodore Shoebat posted a video last night reacting to the news that Fox News had fired Bill O’Reilly amid multiple sexual harassment complaints and settlements. In response to the development, Shoebat claimed that it was unlikely that O’Reilly had ever sexually harassed anyone and that the entire thing was a conspiracy to fill Fox News with pro-gay “closet Nazis.”

“I don’t buy that bullshit,” Shoebat said. “I don’t buy it for a second. I think that is simply a reason, it’s an excuse to get rid of him, it’s really a pretext to get rid of Bill O’Reilly. I don’t think that they just felt so bad for these women. I doubt Bill O’Reilly sexually harassed anybody.”

Shoebat said that after looking into the story, “I did indeed find a conspiracy.”

“My suspicion,” he said, “is that the reason why they’re getting rid of Bill O’Reilly is that they want to get rid of all the old cats in the news business at Fox News. They want to get rid of all the old cats and replace them with people who are more pro-homosexual, they’re explicitly pro-homosexual, they’re pro-perversion and they are also—they could be, that is—closet Nazis.”

WizardofSoda #sexist #racist #crackpot incels.co

RE: [Brutal] Even baby ricelets can't escape the dickmog

Should the definition of micropenis vary according to ethnicity?

Conclusion: Mean penile length and diameter are slightly but significantly smaller in newborns of Chinese origin compared to newborns of Caucasian and East-Indian origins.

Yeah seems to be a correlation with frame, dick size & intelligence. Big body, big dick = No need to hit the books.

Small frame, small dick = Not getting any attention so better get smart to betabux later.

Just add genetics into offspring & there you go.

Ya I see Asians always thinking one day if they get good enough grades, get a high paying enough job, then they can be marriage material.. and then they can get sex.

Big dick guys have their dick 8 inches up inside hot young girls/women right now, they aren't waiting until sometime in the future.

Add to my post: This study could be seen as positive though.. if micropenis babies are identified young they could potentially be given drugs to help grow their penis while they are still children.

And then when there is a defined disease and therefore market just waiting for new and more powerful drugs, that puts money on the line for the pharmaceutical industry to do big time research.

Whereas if something is not defined as a disease, just hey the guy has a small dick.. that means insurers public and private are not going to cover expensive drugs & doctor visits for treatment.

In time the norm will be pathetic short tiny dick man with great job financing foid & her oogabooga retard sports star bulls, cuck gets to hold her hand at most & feel needed.

Paying to exist in her presence.

Those low IQ, uncurious oogaboogas are more relatable to women.. more operate on a primal emotional level. I think to most women the logical minded, analytical man is almost like an alien species that she doesn't want to be around except they have money.

Cope, only female concerns are considered worthy of curing.

No wonder aspies struggle with women.

The female mind in it's natural state is that of a man with schizophrenia.

That is a good way to describe it. One gender will be the logical gender and the other therefore will be the irrational gender.

I think what women want when they are with a guy is that emotional experiences of all the emotions. So a childlike minded Chad who goes from one emotion to the next and really goes deep into the emotion I think is the experience women enjoy.

But the unemotional autist trying to rationalize things with a woman its just cringe and she is not enjoying it at all so leaves very quickly, as she is not getting those emotional highs.

Schizophrenia - Hearing & seeing things, delusional, ruled by emotions, paranoid, out of control emotional response, spontaneous, out of control.

Aspie - Desire to understand things at the technical level, predictable, does not like change, can spend much time doing one thing, does not show emotions externally the way expected, restrained.

What you said makes sense, a good looking guy with the mind, responsibility & foresight of a child that goes with the flow, gets into trouble, is a pleasure seeker to the detriment of all else & turns violent when he stops getting his own way. Oh but he's so fun, until he's not & now you have to pay 10x what you got out. Long term shit for short term pleasure then some cuck is expected to man up & take on that burden in his 30's.

Watching women I notice they just want to experience their emotions.. the worst is some autist explaining the reasoning behind peoples emotional responses to a woman which then reduces the purity and intensity of the experience and therefore the women is extremely resistant to listening to that line of logic.

I think women respond so out of control with emotions because they get a high/pleasure from it.. so you can never really stop people from doing something they are getting so much enjoyment from.

Its like how women always seek to create conflict and dramas.. its for the adrenaline high and the feeling of intense emotions. As women also don't really generate emotions by themselves they feel the emotions of men around them and then it sort of gets amplified by the woman.

Like Schizophrenics women also think everything is about them, that everyone is thinking about them and judging them all the time.

Padraig Martin #homophobia #transphobia identitydixie.com

[From "They Push Too Far: The LGBT Movement"]

The Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender (LGBT) movement is falling apart. It may not seem so, with all the pathetic corporate pandering and the endless stream of gratuitous gay characters on television, but it is. They have pushed too far and now public opinion is turning faster than ever before. This is especially true in the Godly South.

It is seemingly inescapable. Everywhere you turn you are confronted by detestable quasi-rainbow flags. I use the term “quasi” because that is what they are. The rainbow has seven colors; the gay pride flag has six colors. This is no surprise to those who know the Bible. The rainbow is a manifestation of God’s promise to Noah that such destruction will never befall His people again. Thus, what greater means of co-opting a Biblical narrative than using an emblem of God’s promise? But as in all things Satanic, the pride flag comes just short of a Godly promise.

Satan does not create, he imitates – and he always does so in a way that allows the Christian to see with clear eyes his deviancy.

Of course, there is something else that Satan does as well: he always pushes the envelope too far. The beautiful cherub described in the Book of Ezekiel never knows his limits. From contesting God to turning men from Christ, Satan, the father of lies, eventually gets what is coming to him. He always loses.

Satan’s latest manifestation – the worldwide acceptance of unnatural sexual deviancy and the eradication of masculinity – is not new. In fact, the Bible is quite clear on the subject of homosexuality. Leviticus 18:22 calls homosexuality an “abomination.” Leviticus 20:13 calls for something else.

Of course, Christians will point to the fact that Christ has borne our sins and therefore, through Christ, one can repent and not be killed for such depravity. But there is an inconvenient caveat. The operative word is “repent” – as in, to feel truly sorry for the act and to ask of God’s forgiveness. Continuing to engage in homosexuality, consequently, is not only an act that suggests one has not repented, but that Christ was never truly embraced in the first place. 1 Corinthians 6:9 is quite clear about the sinfulness of homosexuality. Gay pastors like to point out that 1 Corinthians 6:11 follows up with a note of Christ’s eternal forgiveness: “And that is what some of you were (gay). But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.” They forget the conditional modifier in the scripture. Paul uses the term “were,” as in formerly gay men who – thanks to Jesus – are no longer gay.

Thus, when so-called gay rights activists call out heterosexual Christians for also sinning, it is just Satan trying to mislead with twisted truth. Of course, we sin. Jesus died for those sins. But none of our churches should welcome the continuation of those sins, nor would the truly repentant Christian continue to celebrate his or her sins.

The absurdity of so-called pro-LGBT Christian churches and congregations is laughable. Name a pastor who is exalted for being a known murderer or rapist. Name a church that puts out signs saying, “Welcome My Whoremongering Brothers!” Name a church that puts out a flag indicating support for its adulterous congregants. I have yet to identify the Methodist Church that has “Thieving Thursdays.”

God forgives sin; Satan glorifies in it.

However, all of this may be coming to a head. Support for LGBT “rights” and acceptance is dropping like a stone. A recent study by the Public Religion Research Institute showed that LGBT support among Millennial Republicans dropped from 74% to 63% – eleven basis points or approximately 15% in one year. Among the reasons cited were the outrageous behavior of homosexuals at gay pride events, transgenderism, and the societal bullying of individuals who do not support LGBT actions, such as conservative Churches or bakeries.

[...]

In a USA Today article referencing the same poll that GLAAD used, world leaders were surprised by the swiftness of the drop in LGBT support. Perhaps that is because LGBT “rights” are seen more clearly by less politically correct and more honest world leaders. Brunei’s Sultan Hassanal Bolkiah wants gay men stoned to death. Kenya’s High Court just upheld laws criminalizing homosexuality. Not to be outdone by obscure brown countries, Poland’s Jaroslaw Kaczynski, leader of the conservative ruling party, called the LGBT movement an “immoral invasion” that “threatens the Christian Nation.” If anyone knows what an invasion looks like, it’s the Poles.

[...]

From Texas to Virginia… from Florida to Arkansas… the South once again rejected Satan.

By contrast, the states with the most pro-LGBT marks were found in the Northeast, the industrial Midwest, and unsurprisingly, the Pacific West Coast.

The LGBT movement may fool themselves, but they cannot fool God. The South, which overwhelming accepts Christ’s message, is not blinded by ostentatious displays of sexual depravity. God will not allow the South to be blinded by the beauty of Satan’s glow.

For now, be happy that these perverted freaks are pushing away the very normies who empowered them. No one who loves their children thinks “transgender story time” is a good thing. No one who loves their children takes them to a parade where simulated sodomy is the norm. Americans, as a whole, seem to be waking up.

In a Free Dixie, we will have freedom from the LGBT community. Their degeneracy will not be tolerated by a Godly people.

Stella Morabito #fundie thefederalist.com

Abolishing all civil marriage is the primary goal of the elites who have been pushing same sex marriage. The scheme called “marriage equality” is not an end in itself, and never really has been. The LGBT agenda has spawned too many other disparate agendas hostile to the existence of marriage, making marriage “unsustainable,” if you will. By now we should be able to hear the growing drumbeat to abolish civil marriage, as well as to legalize polygamy and all manner of reproductive technologies.

Consider also the breakneck speed at which the push for same sex marriage has been happening recently. The agenda’s advocates have been very methodical in their organization, disciplined in their timing, flush with money, in control of all information outlets, including media, Hollywood, and academia. And perhaps most telling is the smearing of any dissenter in the public square, a stigma made de rigueur by Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy in his animus-soaked opinion that repealed the Defense of Marriage Act.

We’ve seen also how the Obama Administration’s push for same sex marriage has occurred in lockstep with policies that are hostile to marriage, such as the severe marriage penalty written into Obamacare.

Activist judges have taken their cues from Attorney General Eric Holder who used the DOMA repeal to proclaim open season on any state that recognizes marriage as an organic (i.e., heterosexual) union of one man and one woman. In their crosshairs are state constitutions, businesses, students, communities, churches, and all of those bogus “conscience clauses” that were written into same sex marriage legislation in order to sway wavering state legislators to vote “aye.”

The tipping point came soon after certain big name conservatives and pundits swallowed the bait on same sex marriage. Folks like Michael Barone, John Bolton, George Will, S. E. Cupp, and David Blankenhorn have played a huge role in building momentum for this movement, which, as we will see, is blazing a trail to the abolition of state recognized marriage. And whether they know it or not, advocacy for same sex marriage is putting a lot of statist machinery into motion. Because once the state no longer has to recognize your marriage and family, the state no longer has to respect the existence of your marriage and family.

Without civil marriage, the family can no longer exist autonomously and serve as a wall of separation between the individual and the state. This has huge implications for the survival of freedom of association.

The notion of marriage equality was never about marriage or about equality. It’s all about the wrapping paper. It’s been packaged as an end in itself, but it is principally just a means to a deeper end. It is the means by which marriage extinction – the true target — can be achieved. If marriage and family are permitted to exist autonomously, power can be de-centralized in society. So the family has always been a thorn in the side of central planners and totalitarians. The connection between its abolition and the limitless growth of the state should be crystal clear. So anyone who has bought into this movement, or is tempted to do so, would want to step back and take a harder look.

mainlander #sexist #dunning-kruger incels.co

[Blackpill] Another effect of feminism in society I just thought about

Feminism is all about equality (in reality, we know that what feminism does is buffing women in the areas where they are perceived as being worse off than men, but doing nothing about the areas where the situation is the opposite, so the end result is actually women becoming above men on average).

Feminism says men and women gotta be "equal". Feminism says no to gender roles, no to male authority, no to age gaps. They want to make sure men and women are as "equal" as possible in a relationship (but only when them not being equal would put men in the perceived benefitial position - an ugly woman dating a Chad, or a poor woman dating a billionaire, does not apply - this inequality is acceptable).

In reality, people are actually turned on by the so called "power imbalances". Men on average want a feminine, younger, frailer, more petite girl, just as women on average want a masculine, tougher, older, bigger man. Most men have dominant kinks, most women have submissive ones.

Feminism makes both sexes less attractive to each other on average. But since, like aforementioned, the "power imbalance" situations are not persecuted when they are perceived as benefitial to women women, Chads and rich men (the elites) are the ones profiting from the current paradigm.

Mainländer #sexist #crackpot #dunning-kruger incels.co

[Blackpill] Another effect of feminism in society I just thought about

Feminism is all about equality (in reality, we know that what feminism does is buffing women in the areas where they are perceived as being worse off than men, but doing nothing about the areas where the situation is the opposite, so the end result is actually women becoming above men on average).

Feminism says men and women gotta be "equal". Feminism says no to gender roles, no to male authority, no to age gaps. They want to make sure men and women are as "equal" as possible in a relationship (but only when them not being equal would put men in the perceived benefitial position - an ugly woman dating a Chad, or a poor woman dating a billionaire, does not apply - this inequality is acceptable).

In reality, people are actually turned on by the so called "power imbalances". Men on average want a feminine, younger, frailer, more petite girl, just as women on average want a masculine, tougher, older, bigger man. Most men have dominant kinks, most women have submissive ones.

Feminism makes both sexes less attractive to each other on average. But since, like aforementioned, the "power imbalance" situations are not persecuted when they are perceived as benefitial to women women, Chads and rich men (the elites) are the ones profiting from the current paradigm.

Cassy Fiano #fundie newsrealblog.com

The average American woman does not hate men, she does not hate marriage, she does not think that all sex is rape, she does not walk around feeling like a consummate victim, she does not glorify abortion and she isn’t inherently liberal. But this is what modern feminism has become. It’s a movement that is filled with women who are extreme leftists, who have a deep-seated hatred for men, and who wallow in victimhood as if it’s some kind of prize to relish. The hijacking of feminism has caused it to be shallow and superficial. Women have been told that in order to be a proper feminist, they have to adhere to a certain set of radical beliefs, they must support abortion, and they must abandon traditional values that Americans have held for centuries.

And yet, they can’t understand why women want nothing to do with feminism anymore.

Sarah Palin represents American women much better than these modern feminists do. She has a certain set of conservative values and she is a feminist. She does not, however, say that you must agree with her in order to be a feminist. She does not demand you agree with her on every last issue in order to like her, either. She could be a huge asset to feminism if they’d get over their stubborn snobbery.

Women like Sarah Palin because they see themselves in her, even if they disagree politically. She’s a working mom with a loving husband and a great family. She got into politics by getting involved with the PTA, for crying out loud. She didn’t set out to make history or change the world. She’s got a common-sense, take-charge, no-nonsense attitude that women can relate to. She sees herself as a self-made woman, rather than constantly catarwauling about how she’s a victim. Women like her for all of these reasons. She’s an everywoman, and she is easier to relate to than extremist role models like Amanda Marcotte or Jessica Valenti.

Kiran Opal #conspiracy twitter.com

(Twitter thread)

Hey USian Lefties, Dem Socialists, Anarchists etc:
STOP SHITTING ON VENEZUELA's & CUBA's socialist govts.
Thanks.

When US lefties are asked "name a good socialist country" they name white majority countries & perpetuating anti Latin America propaganda.

I see you. Don't. Just fucking dont.

Educate yourself beyond goddamn US state & corporate media propaganda AND STOP SHITTING ON VENEZUELA & CUBA.

Basic rule: every US intervention is wrong. Everytime US govt or the big corporations that own it talk about "human rights" they are lying.

If they were not lying, they would first intervene & shut down the Saudi regime & the Israeli regime -the biggest violators of human rights.

wetwareproblem #fundie wetwareproblem.tumblr.com

keep in mind that this person is actually physically in their mid-late thirties and is talking about their multiple personalities or "headmates"/"alters" . The word "system" in this context refers to people with multiple personalities/"headmates"

I am 17 years old. This is not an age regression thing or anything like that; it is “I literally did not exist before a specific incident in 1999.” My body, however, is twice that age. I am the closest thing to a Responsible Adult in here; I am the voice of reason and restraint and caution and the one who tends to take care of adulting.

If I am in a relationship with a 23-year-old, is that gross and predatory? If so, who is abusing whom? Show your work.


This is common logic used by predators and pedos. You’re 17, but then use ur “physical age” to prove how ~wise and mature~ you are? If you mentally think ur 17 ur not a responsible adult then lol ur really not if ur mentally 17 like most of the other discoursers. Stop trying to act like ur some authority bc ur actually 30, but think ur really 17. A relationship w a 23 yr old obviously is not predatory on their part as ur not actually 17, and ur brain physically is developed past that point/you aren’t in highschool anymore. There’s a difference between you being actually 30 but mentally 17 and dating a 23 year old vs a real 17 yr old dating a 23 year old.

Are you also trying to imply that it’s fine for 23 year olds to date 17 year olds, like actual 17 year olds


HOLY FUCKING SHIT, pal. Not only do you have the actual facts involved completely ass-backward (try reading a post before replying to it, instead of trusting blatant lies), but you are actively encouraging child abuse here with a bonus side of ableism and dehumanization.

Please do systems everywhere a favour and stay far away from us. Your ideas about us are harmful and (I can’t emphasize this enough) encourage the actual abuse of literal children


I,,,, what, ? In ur original post you say try to pull weight/claim ur more adult/more mature than other 17 yr olds but u literally cannot have it both ways ? Like, you’ve claimed to be a real adult on other posts ur urs like using the fact ur actually 30 something as support for why you are right.

How am I encouraging child abuse and pedophillia since that’s what u tagged this as lol

One: You’d think that if we’re constantly leaning on our bio age for authority, as you claim, you would be able to actually get it right. You have not. That’s revealing.

Two: You’ve got your understanding of my situation ass-backward, because you listened to someone else’s lies instead of actually reading what you were replying to.

Three: You just said, in so many words, that it is okay for adults to date teenagers. This should be cause to seriously reevaluate what you’re saying and doing. And in the meantime, keep the fuck away from systems.


You said ur mentally 17 yet physically 30, then asked what those ~antis~ were gonna say about ur 23 yo partner ? Like unless u mean something else by antis? I assumed u we’re talking about people being anti pedophillia? Ur the one asking if the 23 yr old is abusing u, the mentally 17 yr old, is a condescending fashion??

Nope. Try again. I said I am literally 17. At this time in 1999, I did not exist. At this time in 2000, I (am reasonably sure I) did. If you scroll up very slightly, you can see this for yourself! Along with me mentioning that I am, in fact, the Responsible Adult in my system - that is, my maturity and responsibility level is considerably ahead of my chronological age

Still off-base. It’s almost like we don’t actually wave our age around as much as you claim!

So are you planning to address what I actually said, or still having fun being ableist as fuck and ignoring the fact that you literally said it was okay for adults to date teenagers?

Admin #transphobia #kinkshaming feministwiki.org

Transgender ideology

Transgender ideology is a loose catch-all term referring to philosophies, world views, and dogmatic statements adhered to by political activists who see themselves as trying to uphold the human rights of transgender people. The political movement of furthering these ideologies is called the transgender movement. Feminists tend to use these terms critically when pointing out sexist, homophobic, or otherwise problematic aspects of the movement. Those who support the transgender movement tend to oppose the term transgender ideology, likening it to phrases such as homosexual agenda which is used to ascribe a sinister intent to gay/lesbian/bisexual rights activists.

The practice of supporting transgender ideology is called transgender activism (often shortened trans activism) and a person who follows this practice is called a transgender activist (often shortened trans activist). The word "transgender" in the phrase "transgender activist" is not to be understood as an adjective for the person in question (i.e. "an activist who happens to be transgender") but as a reference to the activism they practice (i.e. "an activist supporting transgender ideology"). Many trans activists are not transgender themselves.

The term trans rights activist (shortened TRA) is sometimes used for its similarity to men's rights activist (shortened MRA). Just like so-called MRAs claim to support men's human rights but end up blaming everything on women and opposing feminism, TRAs claim to support transgender human rights but end up blaming everything on women and opposing feminism.

Aspects

Trans women are women

One of the core dogmata of the transgender movement is the statement that trans women are women (and the less often repeated trans men are men). Under this view it's important to write trans woman as two words (adjective and noun) and not transwoman, to stress the fact that so-called trans women are literally a subtype of women, just like white women, black women, short women, tall women, and so on. The statement "trans women are women" is not meant as a vague slogan of moral support, but in a literal sense.
Since the statement contradicts the dictionary definition of the word "woman" (adult human female), it implies that a different definition would be better. When asked about this, transgender activists usually avoid providing an actual definition. Most attempts tend to revolve around a circular definition, such as "anyone who identifies as a woman, is a woman." As such, the statement "trans women are women" is probably best described as a dogma.
The idea that transwomen are literally women is taken as the basis for many problematic conclusions, such as: transwomen deserve to partake in women's sports, transwomen should be seen as part of the natural dating pool of lesbians (see also cotton ceiling), transwomen deserve to use all female facilities, enter female-only spaces and events, speak on women's rights as women, and so on.

Gender identity

The idea that "trans women are women" is usually backed by a belief in an essential, inborn, and immutable "gender identity" that every person supposedly possesses.[6] Transwomen are said to be real women on the grounds that they possess a "female gender identity" which they are said to share with women. Likewise for transmen and a "male gender identity" that is supposedly shared by all men.
Just like transgender activists refuse to provide an objective definition of womanhood, they tend to refuse defining gender identity on any objective terms. Usually, when explaining how a person has discovered their gender identity, one hears references to sexist stereotypes ascribed to womanhood and manhood. When confronted directly however, transgender activists refuse the notion that gender identity is based entirely on those stereotypes. Since no objective measure exists at all, they are effectively forced to accept the claims of anyone and everyone regarding what their gender identity is. Thus we see transwomen with full beards and intact male anatomy, who are said to be literally real women like any other.
Transgender children
Since gender identity is said to be inborn, it follows that some children would be transgender, and only need to find this out. Once it's found out, the only way forward is to support the child in its transgender identification. This leads to the transgender activist "affirm-only" approach towards youth, where for instance a boy who says "I wish I was a girl" or "I'm actually a girl" is from that point on treated as if the child is literally a girl. (Given a female name, referred to by female pronouns, asked to be considered a girl by others, and so on.) Likewise for girls who express that they wish they were a boy, or claim that they are internally a boy. Trans activists are opposed to the alternative "watchful waiting" approach.
The trans activist affirm-only approach has been supported by the American Academy of Pediatrics.[7] Parents concerned over this model of treatment published a long criticism and launched a petition reaching 1,200 signatures.[8] Psychologist James Cantor also published a fact-check article criticizing the AAP's decision.
Trans activists usually support giving puberty blocking medication such as Lupron to children who think they are transgender.[7] These children may be as young as 10 years old.

Cisgender people oppress transgender people

Another core tenet of transgender ideology is the notion that cisgender people oppress transgender people, just like how men oppress women, white Americans oppress black Americans, or how straight people oppress gay men and lesbian women.[11][12] As such, when a man identifies as a transwoman, his position relative to that of a woman turns from being her oppressor to someone who is oppressed by her. His male privilege is denied as he is now considered a woman, and the fact that he is a transgender woman means that he is oppressed by so-called cisgender women. Further, being both a woman and transgender means he is considered to suffer under two axes of oppression, akin to how black women suffer both from racism and sexism. This way, a white man suddenly becomes comparable to a black woman with regards to oppressive power dynamics in society.
As per the principle of intersectionality (appropriated from black feminism), transgender activists often say that the feminist movement should not only include transwomen's concerns, but outright center them in many discussions, as otherwise the feminist movement might fail to sufficiently address their concerns.

Collusion with "sex work" activism

For reasons not entirely clear, many if not most transgender activists also seem to support the "sex work" movement.[13] Possible explanations for this collusion might be:
* Both movements stem from queer ideology, which is based on transgression of social norms without regard to ethical concerns
* The transgender movement being dominated by autogynephilic men who are interested in upholding a society in which women exist for male sexual pleasure
* Anti-feminists supporting both the transgender movement and the "sex work" movement, simply because they see both of them as weapons against women's liberation

Word Salad Award

For when "Green ideas sleep furiously."

Energycrisis13 #fundie tos100.wordpress.com

[Check the link for the full post. This is just the tip of the iceberg.]

Did you know homosexuals are actually a retarded people? They now hide behind atheism of science only to attack church as no such thing as no god in this universe ONLY stubborn dumb animals known as atheist homosexuals desiring to seek the shit of another mans ass- truly a retarded people in need of shock therapy. Congressional legislation soon to label all homo people as RETARDS so mankind understand the root cause of atheism and move on

AGAIN=atheists are nothing more than disgruntled homosexuals- if by small chance you are a heterosexual atheist this is simply because you were brainwashed by the homosexuals as all humans are a simple gullible monkey creature without knowledge of our infinite souls and guidance by god….Homosexuals are nothing more than abused children which made by god TO MIRROR the disgust in so called normal civilized behavior of sex lusting monkey people of the earth- everyone repent

The fascinating aspect of the atheists homosexual is theirscientific rational to glorify and colorfy the world of shit. Atheism is world of shit in which your head is up your ass. Homosexuality akin to pagan sex monkey people. both realms are retarded as many retarded people Yet the atheists homosexual may operate with humanity such as congress hair salons and such- families love retards during good times as Pets, bad times kill everything with retard merely in the way and focus of scapegoat policy by simple monkey people of weak faith behavior caused by very retarded shit lined rainbow coalition of shit-the atheists and homosexuals- one in the same made by god to mirror the disgusting pagan weak of faith community at large.repent

HumanSockPuppet #sexist reddit.com

Good day, class. This will be a recap (and expansion) of my original guide to bitch management. In it, you will learn how to manage your bitch(es) by turning your relationship into a game she plays - winning prizes of intimacy for good behaviour, and getting punished with demotion or exile if she fails.
Additionally, this guide will also cover:

What it means to manage a bitch, and the challenges you will face
Why bitch management is ultimately YOUR responsibility
Relationship strategies for maximizing happiness and minimizing drama
How to turn those strategies into lasting positive lifestyle changes

This guide will begin with some basic theory, describing why men are the arbitrators of relationships. It will then establish some common definitions and lay the groundwork for the strategy section afterwards.
As you read this guide, bear in mind that it is a model, not an absolute treatise. You are free (and encouraged) to modify any part of it to suit you. But for the most part, the principles outlined here should be fairly universal.
We say AWALT for a reason.

Disclaimers:

1) In order to sustain a prosperous relationship with a girl, you MUST be comfortable with bossing her around - being a bonafide Patriarch™.
You don't have to be a master of your emotions yet. But at the very least, you must be willing to be firm with her, give her orders, and tell her "no", even against a flood of her tears.

Why? Because ultimately, women get their behavioural cues from men. Remember, women are children: mentally, behaviourally, evolutionarily. They are not like us. They don’t think like us, or have the same deep sense of personal responsibility.

Even the most sociopathic man will intuitively know when he has crossed a boundary and offended another man. Whether or not he feels guilty about it is a different issue, but he at least knows he’s done something wrong. Evolving this instinct was the key to a man’s ability to either strategically make enemies or avoid unwanted conflicts.

Women, on the other hand, evolved no such instinct. On the contrary, women evolved the instinct to push a man’s buttons as a way of testing his willingness to face conflict head-on (what we call shit-testing). A man who is willing to fight against her will also fight FOR her. Likewise, a man who caves before her will most certainly cave before his enemies.

This is why bossing her around is key. She is evolved to push the boundary by picking fights with you. So unless you are strict with your girl, she will become as selfish and insufferable as you let her get away with.

2) A long-term relationship CANNOT be your end goal. You can only be OPEN to the possibility of having one.
Men are the gatekeepers of relationships. Since a relationship is what you have to offer, you mustn’t just give it away. It must be a reward she earns in small doses for inspiring your trust and devotion.

I understand that many of you want a LTR with a good girl – sometimes a series of flings isn’t enough to fulfill you. Believe me, I sympathize.
But winning a LTR is HER problem, not yours. Handing a girl your devotion won’t magically make her worthy of it. When you WANT a LTR too badly, you place your focus on the idea of having a relationship instead of evaluating the girl. You become fixated on your fantasy relationship and selectively ignore the things happening right in front of you: her deep character flaws, her indiscretions, and the red flags.

You must regard women as candidates applying for the job of being your girlfriend – a supporter, a lover, a comfort away from the everyday battles. Don't just hire a bitch because you want the position filled. Make sure you vet your candidates fiercely and hire the right girl for the job.
This guide will help you do just that.

3) This guide will be far less effective if you’re already married.

As a man, your ONLY power in a relationship is the power to revoke your attention, validation, and your time by walking away – sometimes for good. It’s the only strategy you have, but it’s a potent one, and for a very specific reason:
You may want a woman, but women NEED you. The problem with marriage is that it strips you of the ability to completely walk away. Sure, you can still get a divorce, but not without shooting yourself in the foot, possibly losing your children and a significant portion of your hard-earned assets in the process.

Our current social climate is not amenable to marriage. If you’re already married, you have my condolences. If you’re not married but plan on it, then you’re a moron and you have no one to blame but yourself when your mistake comes back to bite you in the ass. And bite you it will.

Theory: The Fundamental Principle of Sex and Relationships

The Fundamental Principle states that women are the gatekeepers of sex, and men are the gatekeepers of relationships. You should be familiar with it by now. If not, educate your ass here.

Beyond a man's Relationship Gate lies a paradise that every girl wants to live in. It is a magical place where pickle jars are opened, spiders are squished, rides are given, appliances are fixed, cuddles are administered, encouragement is provided, and order is firmly established. And all of that requires a man’s time and effort.

As a man, your time and effort is your most valuable asset. You use it to get shit done – most often shit that’s related to Your Mission. When you give that time to someone else, it is a tremendous gift which should be appreciated and respected. This is the key principle behind bitch management. You must demand that a girl appreciate and respect your time.

Some men don’t demand respect for their time. They are too liberal with who they let through their Relationship Gate. They've got no border patrol, no review process. Just a country full of free benefits for anyone who crosses over. These are the beta-orbiters, and they are constantly beset by every vagrant vagina and panhandling pussy that bats its attached eyelashes.

Other men are too strict about admission. They only issue temporary sex visas, and they often deport women without notice. These are the uninterested lone-alphas, and they have chosen a lifestyle of banging and then flying solo. YOU, on the other hand, are open to a LTR with a bitch – IF she earns it.Managing your life and your bitches comes down to awarding her ONLY the time that she has earned. You can decide just how much of your time a bitch has earned by assigning her with a “rank”.


Definitions: An Overview of "Ranks"

We use a lot of terms for describing a relationship with a girl: girlfriend, fiancee, one-night stand (ONS), plate, friend-with-benefits (FWB), etc.
But what do these terms really mean?
From a male perspective, each term implies a different level of investment in the girl – an investment of time, effort, emotions, and other precious male resources. As such, they can be arranged as ranks in order of how much investment each term implies.

Here is a list of ranks we will use (along with working definitions) ordered from least to greatest:
Level 0: One-Night Stand -or- Pump and Dump. You throw a fuck into this girl and never see her again (unless she reaches out to you). It is a single encounter that is casual, sexual, and impersonal. You may or may not have met her before the encounter, and you may or may not even know her name. She is a one-time answer to a physical necessity - nothing more.
Requires no maintenance and a very low investment of time.

Level 1: Plate -or- Fuck Buddy. You have sex with this girl more than once. You will know her name and just enough about her life so you can schedule sexual encounters. You may also know a little bit about her personally, so you can help her rationalize being your fucktoy, assuming she's uncomfortable about the idea of being one. Otherwise, she's down with it and you're both satisfied with being casual. She is a temporary answer to a physical necessity.
Requires some maintenance and a low investment of time.

Level 2: Friends with Benefits. You have sex with this girl more than once - typically as often as mutual convenience allows, but perhaps even when it's not completely convenient for her (because she likes you enough to go out of her way). You also spend non-sexual time with this girl, like eating out or pursuing activities of mutual interest. You know more about her personal life, and she knows more about yours, and as a result the two of you exchange mutual, non-sexual favours from time to time. You will most certainly have good memories of non-sexual time spent with this girl, which will lead to positive emotional investment in her, making her more than just an answer to a physical necessity.
Requires moderate maintenance and a moderate investment of time.

Level 3: Significant Other -or- Girlfriend. The highest level of intimacy a girl can earn. You have sex with this girl often, usually more often than you do any of your other girls. You also spend a considerable amount of non-sexual time with this girl, resulting in many shared memories and a deeper emotional investment. At this level, there is significant mutual concern for the other's well-being. The girl in particular will feel a great dependence on your direct and involved guidance in her life (rather than simple stoicism and confidence). Emotions are strongly felt at this level: affection is especially sweet, and betrayal can be especially bitter.

Requires significant maintenance and a significant investment of time.

Strategy: How She Plays the Game

The game itself is quite simple:
A girl begins the game at Level 0 or Level 1, depending on the context in which you two met.
If you met in a club, or began as total strangers grinding against each other at a house party, she's Level 0.
If you two met in a slightly more sociable manner - perhaps introduced by mutual friends, or she impressed you with her pleasant demeanour after you opened her at the local cafe, she's Level 1. She can also bump up from Level 0 to Level 1 if she reaches out and maintains pleasant and reasonable contact with you after a casual sexual encounter.

From that point on, a girl must perform NON-SEXUAL services for you in order to advance in rank.
These services can include, but are not limited to:
Cooking you a healthy meal. Either at your place or by invitation to hers.
Treating you out some place. A restaurant or an activity of interest to YOU. Bonus points if you've never done the activity but it looks like fun - that means she's really thinking about you.

Buying you a well-thought-out gift. Not just a random thing, but a gift which demonstrates an effort to understand your life and interests (example: therapeutic shoe insoles for a guy who likes running, or high-quality ear buds for a music-lover). The accuracy of her insight is more important than the cost of the gift.

Hand-making you an artistic gift. These might include a picture or painting, a poem, a knitted scarf, a calendar of her photography, and the like. The more personalized the gift, the better. A hand-made gift doesn't have to be highly useful (since making useful things is tough), as long as the gift shows patience, diligence, and an attention to detail.

The greater her investment of time and effort in the gesture, the more credit she earns with you. Eventually, if she shows a consistent pattern of investing effort in you, she can advance in rank by one level.

As previously stated, a girl must invest time and effort in you in order to get your time and effort in return.

Why Do the Services Have to Be Non-Sexual?

Simple. Because a girl doesn't have to exert any effort at all to have sex. If she is attractive enough, all she needs to do to get sex is show up. Someone will fuck her if she makes herself available.
This game only rewards effort. You should also remember this: sex is the most fundamental pre-requisite of any non-platonic interaction between a guy and a girl. You'll never find yourself in a situation where a girl is giving you gifts and cooking you meals, but NOT having sex with you (unless you’re both a coward and too daft to read the signs). If sex isn't happening, then something is terribly amiss and you must either correct it or next her. Which brings us to our next section...

Strategy: Punishment and Demotion

There are many ways in which a girl can make a mistake and upset you. Maybe she starches your shirts too much, or she burns the dinner she was making for you. These kinds of mistakes should not be punished with demotion because, despite her mistake, she is investing time and effort in you. You can think of a suitable punishment and repayment for your lost shirt without going to the extreme of knocking her down a rank.
Instead, demotable offenses should be offenses that are an affront to your dignity, your authority, or to the time and effort you have invested in her.
Offenses can be intentional or unintentional.

Unintentional offenses will usually come in the form of some indiscretion on her part, as she slowly loses attraction for you, her conscious effort wanes, and she slips back into her natural hypergamous state.

Some examples of unintentional offenses are:
Unconsciously being too flirty with another guy (shit-test, can occur at any level).
Failing to keep an important promise (usually by neglect or poor-planning), the consequences of which cost you a substantial amount of money or ANY amount of reputation (failing of respect, this offense will happen at Level 2 or above, since you don't entrust these matters to girls below Level 2).
Neglecting some important duty that you have assigned to her (failing of respect, typically occurs at Level 3).

Frequency of sex decreases, and she absently evades when you try to initiate sex (loss of attraction, can occur at any level).
Committing an unintentional offense should typically result in the demotion of the girl by one (1) rank.
Intentional offenses are far more vulgar than their counterparts. Intentional offenses are usually targeted shit-tests meant to re-assess your fitness. In some extreme cases they might even occur in the presence of friends and family, making them vindictive attacks against your reputation or dignity.

Some examples of intentional offenses are:
Consciously flirting with another guy, trying to arouse jealousy in you (shit-test, can occur at any level).
Openly insulting you (shit-test, can occur at any level).
Frequency of sex decreases, and she consciously and vehemently evades when you try to initiate sex or talk about it (loss of attraction, can occur at any level).
Committing an intentional offense should result in the demotion of the girl by two (2) ranks. Committing a vindictive attack against your reputation should result in a loss of three (3) ranks.

Now, this next part is important, so pay attention:
Once a girl has been demoted, her current level becomes the maximum level she can ever be again. She can only climb the ladder as long as she is flawless in the execution of her womanly duties. Once she commits a serious offense, she is demoted, and she can never rise again.

Some examples of transgressions and appropriate punishments:
A plate (level 1) who fails to provide sex on demand drops one rank to level 0, and she is replaced by a plate who will.
A friend-with-benefits (level 2) who remorselessly loses your expensive digital camera drops one rank and becomes a plate forevermore.
A girlfriend (rank 3) who drunkenly humiliates you in front of your friends at a party drops three ranks to level 0, and you quietly disappear and move on.
Now, I know what you’re thinking. Permanent plate status? Walking away for good? Aren’t these punishments pretty severe?

In reality, the offenses outlined above will generally only occur for one of two reasons:
You’ve slipped up in your duties as a Red Pill man and her attraction for you is beginning to wane.
She doesn’t have the sense to recognize her unworthy behavior because of a failure of parenting that occurred long before you met her.
If it’s reason 1, then you’re at fault, and you’re better off starting from scratch with a new bitch then trying to salvage a relationship that’s on a downward slope. If it’s reason 2, then the girl was never worth your time to begin with, and you simply didn’t know it until now. You can’t turn a ho into a housewife, so don’t even bother trying to reform her.

In general, you must be uncompromising whenever you punish your bitch. Remember what we’ve already established: girls look to you for cues on what’s okay. If you don’t crack down on bad behavior when it happens, a girl’s only assumption is that you are perfectly okay with whatever she’s done. Hypergamy is selfish by nature, and it shows no mercy. Tough love is the only effective response.

There’s also another benefit to being ruthless: meting out uncompromising punishment helps to keep you in abundance mentality. An uncompromising approach helps you to avoid the risk of developing oneitis, and it prevents you from being manipulated by women who are all too good at tugging at your sympathy to get just one/two/five more chances.

Keep your life drama-free by dropping troublesome bitches. With so many eligible bachelorettes out there looking desperately for a strong man like you, no single one of them is worth your grief.

Strategy: Naturalizing the Process

As you learn the rhythm of using rewards and punishments to keep your bitch enthralled, you’ll develop an intuition for how to play your part of the game. The process will become second-nature to you. You’ll naturally become bored with women who fail to show you the proper appreciation, and gravitate towards the ones who make your life more pleasant.

That’s the ultimate goal here: to make you a natural. You’ll never say to your bitch “You’re a level 1 plate now!” or “You’re going down a rank for that shit!” This system is for YOU – so you can have an abstract model with which to understand the game, until managing bitches becomes as natural to you as breathing or blowing a load on her face.

Final Thoughts

The key trait of the modern western woman is her absolute lack of concern for the desires of men. Our cuckold state has all but replaced men as husbands and providers, and so it would seem like the traditional relationship is basically obsolete – that women will never again need to concern themselves with OUR wants. Nothing could be further from the truth.

Though a woman can subsist off the benefits paid for by our taxes, the government cannot give her the love, the attention, the stability, the masculine reassurance, and direct intervention that are so crucial to her emotional well-being. A woman feels vulnerable in a role of leadership, and she feels lost without a masculine leader to boldly claim responsibility for confronting all of the challenges that terrify her. No government can provide that for her. For that, she must come to us.

And for that, we must demand a price.

My hope is that this guide has helped you realize just how much leverage you have in the sexual dynamic – much more than you once thought. Let this guide help you to capitalize on that leverage – for the sake of your happiness, and for the happiness of any woman who works hard enough to earn your time and effort.

some TERFs #sexist reddit.com

Re: On how the only aspects of "womanhood" that are valued are the ones males can buy into

image

(lacubana)
Yesssss thissssss

Wanna know when I felt most “like a woman”? I can tell you I sure wasn’t wearing makeup or heels or having a pillow fight. I wasn’t delicate in the slightest.

It was when I was pushing another human I had made out of my body. Oh yeah that.

(earthgarden)
and if you're not pushing a human out, or in the process of growing a human, you get a monthly reminder by your body (for at least 4 f!cking decades of your life!) that it had to tear down the nest it built just in case you set one to growing. I swear to god!! If men could experience a period ONCE they would leave us TF alone! That would be an end to the oppression because their pity would know no bounds, they'd experience massive shame at the treatment men have inflicted upon female humanity these long millennia. because then they'd realize nature already oppresses us just fine, thank you very much

(LadyCeer)
My dad used to be really sweet about it and let me sleep a lot and he fed me eggs and ibuprofen and was just very kind when I was being shot down by my period. He also used to talk to women in the form of long, friendly, non-sexual conversations....But then, he never tried to become a woman. Maybe that's a connection.

(shortstroll)
I don't know about your theory but I think it's one of two options.

The first is that some of them are just gay men who in their formative years internalised gender roles. So since they like clothes, have a crush on a dude and their penis isnt a major erogenous zones they think they are girls. It's also sub conscious sexual strategy. There's a greater selection of partners for them if they can fake being a woman. In fact you now see them pushing the idea that genuine heterosexual males would knowingly copulate with a tim.

The second is that some of them are straight men who just have a weird fetishism of womanhood. They don't just want to have sex with women, they want to be them. This isn't dissimilar from the cannibals who get sexual gratification from eating their sexual partners. Bruce Jenner is the perfect example of this. He slowly turned himself into a male version of his wife and the closer he got to his goal the greater his resentment of her grew. Once he had completed his transition, he didn't just discard her, he tried to destroy her in the media. I'm convinced that in a different world, he would have murdered her. That would have been his version of a perfect conclusion.

(TerribleConfusion)
I saw Graham Linehan retweeted a man suggesting something similar. It’s hard to empathise with this, as a woman, but it seemed to make sense to him and the other guy. And I suppose when you think about it, a lot of men do get INCREDIBLY uncomfortable when discussing ways in which men oppress women. Even decent guys don’t want to think about it. So I can kind of imagine how that discomfort might feed in to autogynephilia. Maybe when you feel like your desire is oppressive you want to be the object of desire instead of the subject.

It’s very hard to reconcile this with how misogynistic many TIMs are, though. But I suppose maybe they feel like they’re allowed to hate and bully women because they’re “women” too, and they’re more special and oppressed than any other kind of woman blah blah etc. And maybe it’s the most misogynistic and shitty of men who are most uncomfortable with themselves deep down so they transition to escape their own shittiness. Spoiler: they don’t escape it, they just found a different method than other misogynists to project their shittiness on to (actual) women.

(witchy_xx)
actually this is the exact reason given when my ex came out as trans. he wanted to escape the role of oppressor. what a load of shit.

it's also an easy power grab. for example that asshat Hailey Heartless was a no one politically before and now everyone knows his name.

(griffxx)
We have seen TIMs along with their Handmaidens, trying to dislocate all things female, from the definition of of woman, womanhood and female. I'm truly fascinated, in a psychologically clinical way, the TIMs asserting that they have Bloodless Periods. This a whole other level of Delusion.

Why on Earth did these Feminized White Men, think they could dictate WOMEN diminished our Womanhood, for their OBSESSIVE NARCISSISTIC NEED FOR THE VALIDATION OF THEIR GENDER IDENTITIES!!!!!

The minute these Prostate Havers and their Handmaidens said point blank that, "FEMALE BIOLOGY AND THE EXPERIENCES OF LIVING IN THE BODY, HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH WOMANHOOD" this Misogynistic, Homophobic and Racist Movement should have been REELED/REALED in to what it was supposed to be:

Lobbying and advocating for laws that reassert Civil Rights protections against various forms of discrimination.

They have framed as "A FIGHT FOR THEIR EXISTENCE" this is categorically A LIE.

And to make the claim there are plenty of Lesbians that will date and fuck them; Bisexual leaning women more like. If this were true the Cotton Ceiling War Against Lesbian Sexuality would have ended 5 years ago. Instead it's still continues, and we are at 7.5 year mark.

We need to build on the momentum, we currently have. We need to explain to the Civilian class of women--> not part of the Feminist or LGBTQ Communities, how White TIMs are engaged in the process of erasing their sex-based protections, in the name of attaining their Civil Rights

(scienceisarealthing)

I have no way of knowing whether most pass or not. I’ve never seen a study. All I have is anecdotal evidence.

I've seen a lot of trans-identified males in real life as well as in photo & it's very rare for them to pass. The few who do pass visually are clockable as male as soon as you hear their voice, see their body shape, or see how large their bone structure is when they are next to a female person. This is not meant as an "insult" btw, bc there's nothing wrong with being a feminine male (as long as they arent sexist, etc...)

Transmisogyny is intrinsically illogical bc either the trans-ID'd male passes as female (and experiences some forms of misogyny) or he is clocked as male & faces homophobia/ transphobia/ whatever you wanna call hatred/ disgust against gnc males. It's the reason why drunk guys will sometimes hit on a trans-ID'd male, then the moment they find out he's actually male will scream things like "Fggot! Trnny!!" and sometimes resort to physical violence. That is NOT an example of misogyny bc it wouldn't happen to a female.

How would you know you saw a trans person if they did pass though?

I've never seen a trans-ID'd male who passes in real life, only in photos. There's just no getting around the differences in bone structure, voice, and movements between males and females when you observe people in real life. As someone who is involved in the natural sciences & figure drawing, it is easy to determine someone's natal sex & tell if they are trans or not.

edit: I mean, even when you look at the transpassing sub, few pass even in photo. It does a disservice to trans people to lie to them by telling them they pass when they don't. I see women and other trans people do this all the time & it makes me cringe, because it's so obviously.. not true. In fact, it comes across as cruel to lie to someone like that. It should be ok for people to look/ dress however they want without striving for the unattainable goal of passing completely as the opposite sex.

If a trans woman passes as female, what forms of misogyny would they not face? Honest question. Is it just from medical professionals who would know about someone’s private health details? If they pass, then why would it come up in conversation?

Side question, why does it matter if someone is facing violence due to misogyny or transphobia? Why put up one more barrier between people who have similar experiences under the same system?

It is impossible to say definitively whether or not most trans women can pass based on one person’s interaction with the public. You can definitely say that you’ve seen some trans people not passing. Why would anyone reveal their medical history to a stranger?

Jesus christ, seriously? They wouldn't face:

-limited birth control access, abortion access, reproductive rights battles

-the pain of pregnancy/ discrimination against pregnant women

-dying in childbirth

-the fear of becoming pregnant

-menstrual pain/ stigma/ menstrual huts

-female genital mutilation

-femicide/ sex selective abortion

-medical stigma against female health concerns like PCOS, uterine cysts, endometriosis, severe PMS, menopause, etc... (the list goes on & on)

-sex trafficking & rape (most men want to rape females, not trans-ID'd males)

-being sold as a child bride

-limited access to education bc of being female

-breast ironing

-bride burning

-foot binding (though this only happened to females in the past, as far as i know)

I'm leaving off so much more I can't think of right now. Trans men, nonbinary females, women.. we all face these issues based on what part of the world we live in. It matters whether someone faces misogyny vs. homophobia/ transphobia because those are different forms of oppression! By your same logic, we could include men who face racism under the branch of feminism because (as you said) "Why put up one more barrier between people who have similar experiences?"

FEMinism is the only political movement that is exclusively for FEMales. It's horrible that other people face different forms of oppression, but they can form their own movements to address their needs. Black women & black men both face racism but ONLY black women are welcome in feminism. Poor men & poor women are both economically oppressed, but ONLY the poor woman is welcome in feminism. A woman & a passing trans-ID'd male may both be catcalled, but ONLY the woman is welcome in feminism.

Trans-ID'd males are welcome to (and in fact, already have) formed their own political movements against the unique problems they face. It is narcissistic and unreasonable to demand that women dismantle the ONLY political movement that we have to ourselves. Can female people seriously have nothing to ourselves?Do we have to give in to every group who wants "in"? We can be allies with each other to overcome some similar problems we may face (if any), but we are not the same, and that distinction in lived reality matters.

Isn’t feminism for anyone who believes in the social, economic, and political equality of women? Everyone is welcome. That is a great point about not including everyone who is oppressed ever, but the type of oppression we are talking about is targeted at people who present as female. What I find disturbing by your response is that you aren’t inclusive. Why do you need to say that someone is not welcome if they are experiencing something as common as cat calling or workplace harassment? Would it be so bad if a trans woman was in your circle? Would you not feel safe? I don’t understand what benefit there is to being so specific in membership? It seems to me that it would be best to differentiate by who is suffering a type of discrimination. For example, a trans woman might be subject to being talked down to in public (there is a great TEDtalk by a trans woman who knows what it is like to walk around in society as an adult male and an adult female. She passes btw). A trans male might have not had access to birth control prior to transitioning. I would think both types of people would be welcome.

Feminism is Liberation of females from male oppression. We are already equal, stating that is redundant and offensive.

innocent_butungu & Administrative_Worth #sexist #homophobia #transphobia reddit.com

image

(innocent_butungu)

Can lesbians be incel? I'm honestly not sure, we need some high-IQ-cels to conduct a scientific study.

If lesbians existed, probably. But reality is lesbians do not exist. Lesbians are just etero girls going bisexual for shit and giggles.

The only true lesbians are basically FtM trans without gender dysphoria

(Administrative_Worth)

Reminder that women can get women easier than us. And most have already at some point.

So fucking true. Women's preference for fuckng goes chad, chad-lite, and high tier stacies. Stacy's becky's. 5.5/10 guys, Dogs, and then genetic trash both male and female. Male, below 3.5 women see you as trash, foids, below 2.5 you're genetic trash.

James Miller #sexist returnofkings.com

The Case For Gendo-Nationalism
image
James Miller is a political strategist and policy intellectual from New York City. He is the founder and president of the James Miller Foundation.

The alt-right and their leaders have often stressed the need for the establishment of a ethno-state on the North American continent. While I can understand many of their concerns as a middle-class white guy who lives in a gated community in the suburbs of New York City, I honestly do not have to deal with the minority problem on a day to day basis.

Whether the Bronx is being flooded with new arrivals is simply not my problem. Thots, on the other hand, affect us wherever we live. It doesn’t matter how great your neighborhood is or even how religious your state is. America has become a degenerate nation, and thottery has pervaded all aspects of American life—Northern and Southern, Protestant and Catholic, conservative and liberal, normie and alt-right.

image
A thot prepares to flash her breasts to a crowd of onlookers in a ‘conservative’ state in the Deep South.

Traditionalism Is Hopeless

Many on the right advocate for traditionalism. They think we can just return to the days of a nuclear family, reverse all three waves of feminism, and let women assume their traditional role. While I respect the arguments made by traditionalists, I have concluded that any sort of rollback is now politically impossible in the United States. We have lost the culture war. There is no going back. Sure, you can flee to a country where remnants of traditionalism still exist, but they are merely a little further back on the ongoing global shift towards female ‘liberation’ and the dissolution of family life.

Furthermore, while this problem has been substantially amplified in recent years, it is certainly not a modern one. Thots have consistently been the downfall of powerful men throughout history. John F. Kennedy was compromised by the Soviet Union as a result of depraved female temptresses. Even Adolf Hitler’s defeat in the Second World War can be attributed largely to the presence of Eva Braun. Cleopatra’s betrayal of Mark Antony the moment a more alpha chad arrived on the scene surely serves as one of the clearest demonstrations of the subversion of the opposite sex.

Richard Spencer similarly and correctly recognizes a return to the days of actual white supremacy is impossible and undesirable, and instead advocates for a white ethno-state, building on the momentum of left-wing identity politics movements. Although I respectfully disagree with him on that issue, his fundamental analysis is correct. We cannot return to an undefined point in the past when things were somehow better on the issues that we care about. All we can do is seek to influence the future. I have thus come to the conclusion that the only solution to our current thot debacle is peaceful separation between the sexes, and a resulting male gendo-state.

Now, this notion may sound absurd. Most traditionalists love and respect women, and simply wish for them to return to their historical place in society, rather than be done away with altogether. They must come to understand that separation has now become a necessity.

image
We may reach the point of open conflict with the opposing gender.

Separation Is Necessary

Cultural feminism has degraded women to the point where co-existence is a net negative to males. Women weaken men by their very presence, co-opting and hijacking even traditionalist movements by embracing the rhetoric and yet leaving much to be desired in terms of the personal example they set.

As the last few weeks have shown, women are able to completely destroy the reputations of decent, upstanding men through false accusations of sexual abuse. Women compete with us in a job market that is rigged against us by politicians who have come to see women as an essential voting bloc to appease. Women now even proudly declare that they do not need or want men in their lives.

Why don’t we put that to the test? Let us see how well the opposing gender fares when left completely to their own devices. In this way, we could use the rise of feminism as force of acceleration in order to promote our bid for nationhood. It is ironically fairly likely that the world’s first gendo-state will consist of pink haired female ogres LARPing as Amazons. But once the precedent is set, males will have a unique opportunity to seize the moment and build the case for our secession.

The Vision

Gendo-nationalism would involve near-total separation between men and women. A physical border would be erected between the respective male and female nation-states, and travel between these gendo-states would be tightly controlled and require permission from the governing authority of the gendo-state being entered. In the male gendo-state, which I have little doubt will be far more successful than its female competitor, male chauvinism will be the zeitgeist of the new order.

In addition, we need to think about the only real thing we need women for—sex. Advancements in robotics in recent years are quickly making this need obsolete. Future improvements in cloning technology may even allow us to replace women for the purposes of reproduction. Until the point at which a solution is devised, the gendo-state could have a work visa system which prostitutes and surrogates could utilize without permanent settlement in our new nation.

image
Soon, we will no longer need women to lead fulfilling sex lives.

The Path Ahead

Before we can have separation, we need to have a general sense of male identity. Now, I believe this to an extent to be inherent and hardwired, hence the presence of so many all-male social groups in our society. Nevertheless, we must promote the importance of masculinity and push close identification with our gender’s collective interests as a component of that.

Subsequently, we need to urge our fellow men to gradually start removing all emotional attachment to women. They’re to be seen as a tool, not a crutch. Emotional attachment makes men the weaker sex because women are inherently able to exploit it, and ensures the perpetuation of the anti-male status quo. Once it is overcome, the foundations for a gendo-state can be laid.

Free from the shackles of womankind, men will be able to embrace their true potential. We will have hours more in our days which would otherwise be wasted on entertaining vacuous thots. We will no longer be treated like second class citizens in the very nations we built and shed our blood for. Our inherent physical and mental supremacy will give us a substantial edge in the world marketplace. Much as ethno-nationalist movements played a major role in defining the 20th century, my hope is that gendo-nationalism will define the 21st.

chimpburger, AnOminous, et. al. #fundie kiwifarms.net

[Highlights from a conversation about Fundies Say the Darndest Things on Kiwi Farms, where the OP challenged people to "find shit on there and their super spergy posts."]

chimpburgers: Haha these guys again.

They can shove their tranny communist white knighting right back where it came from as far as I'm concerned cause that's what this site looks like to me.

Proof of the blatant communism over there. Their pussy spines crackle when they hear about Trump.

[...]

AnOminous: It used to be actually about fundies. Now it's about them REEEEing at anything that triggers their euphoria and causes their fedoras to fly off.

[...]

NotCobalt: Yeah. But back then they actually made fun of the lulcows, known as fundies. Both sandniggers and jesustards were fair game.

I remember this fag was a huge target:
https://encyclopediadramatica.se/LoneWolf1984

[...]

StarvingAutist: One of the comments linked in the OP called us an "alt-right/GamerGate safe space", probably because he falls into the "if you complain about SJWs then you're a racist" bullshit.

[...]

TimeToTurn: A formerly great site. 2016 Presidential election pretty much finished off everything great about the site. It used to be "Look at some crazy nut on X site", now it's "look at some mean thing a Republican said" and most of the posts were reposts from other left-wing blogs. Once gay marriage got legalised in the US, even the funny homophobia mostly stopped. It's too bad, because there's still tons of exceptional websites run by religious idiots of all faiths, but they'd rather just whine about what Donald Trump did this week. Distind's departure was basically the last straw of the devolution of FSTDT.

Haven't been on there in a while. Don't really feel like it. It was fun being left-wing and being a self-professed authoritarian at the same time, which got me quoted so many times. I just have to play an over-the-top version of what I believe IRL and they would get so triggered. Lots of great discussion was to be had, both from the SJWs freaking out and then the people who were actually semi-intelligent.

My scientific analysis blames this on the fact that FSTDT emerged with the New Atheism movement (along with Rational Wiki and other shit) and as that movement declined into infighting and irrelevance, so did its offspring, which is a reason why Rational Wiki and FSTDT (a proud partner of Rational Wiki) are shite nowadays.

I'm probably reminiscing too much now. Eh, right now I'm about as drunk as I was whenever I'd post there. Thanks for the thread, you Kiwi Farmers, even though I'll regret posting here before long.

@FelineDarkmage

I'm trying so hard right now to see the remnants of good on this site. But TimetoTurn does have a point about us being autistic as fuck. And @autism420 is still Islamic IMO.

Thanks man. Should be no surprise to you that a fellow autist like me would show up here. Autists there hate me. But it was glad I learned that all spergs needed to believe the same things about autism OR ELSE.

[...]

NotCobalt: [in response to a user making a list of quotes from the topic] What list? The one of "people you want to have sex with" or the one "These exceptional individuals used to belong to an ancient forum with like perhaps 500 active members, so they probably know each other, and I wish I had been a part of that cool kids club back when, but instead I was too poor to afford internet, so I just cried all day instead"?

[...]

sikotik: The site started going down hill as early as 2008 when every other user became a tranny &/or easily triggered furry.

[...]

TimeToTurn: Never knew Marjan got banned, but I can assume he would with the new administration. Distind only banned spammers and shit. The new administration seems intent on making it a "safe space". Even though they always made fun of other websites like Free Republic and Rapture Ready for "suppressing free speech". I can't post shit messing with them (or I could, if I had a day to waste). So Marjan/caamib/whatever he calls himself can't do the same. I'd assume Marjan might be back at some point, but I don't really care to investigate. They really hate TOR, too, nowadays.

David J. Stewart I'm sure is as crazy as always, but him getting any crazier would take divine intervention and I'd just await either reports of his death (guy's a painkiller addict) or more dealings with the Guam government.

[...]

Dr W: The problem was that they didn't branch out into mocking SJWs. That's what kept Kiwi Farms rather politically inert. Instead, they allowed a core of crazy tranny furry dipshits to eject fecal matter everywhere.

Damn shame, I used to love that site.

[...]

rianzi: Shame how the site became infested by SJWS. It used to be a nice place where you could laugh at religious loons.

Corey Savage #sexist returnofkings.com

10 Feminist Fantasies That Could Become A Reality In The Near Future

Corey is an iconoclast and the author of ‘Man’s Fight for Existence’. He believes that the key to life is for men to honour their primal nature.

Around 2013 when I first discovered the manosphere, I knew things were bad in our society in terms of sex relations along with the corroding effects of feminism. But at the time, I didn’t appreciate just know how bad. In just few years since then, I’ve seen enough madness to know which direction we’re headed and it doesn’t look good. We already live in a feminist society and the harpies are pushing to make things even harder for ordinary men who just want to get on with their lives. The following will demonstrate what will happen to our society if we were to give into all the demented demands of today’s feminists.

Although this article is meant to highlight the craziness of it all, note that many of these concepts are already starting to take shape in our societies to become a reality.

1. Expansion Of Hate-Crime Laws
image
“You can’t save Mary Jane anymore, Spiderman. It’s ‘benevolent sexism’, and therefore, a misogynistic hate-crime.”

In England, trying to pick-up a woman or even just whistling at her is considered a “hate crime” if the woman gets upset by it. It is a real possibility that this law might spread to the rest of the West and expand to include other misogynist offenses including: looking at a woman (what feminists call “stare rape”), calling a trans-woman a he (there’s already a similar law in New York), arguing with women online, manspreading, mansplaining, helping a woman, and so on.

2. Consent Forms
image
Since women get to dictate the terms of all sexual interactions, consent forms will have to become a necessity in the future. And not just for sex, but in all forms of interaction like being able to approach a woman on the street. Maybe an app will be developed where a woman could consent to sex, conversation, or being looked at so that she could screen out all the low-life misogynists who want to compliment her for her looks.

3. Anonymous Rape Accusations + 100% Belief In Woman’s Testament
image
All men are rapists; we need to believe her because she’s a woman. It’s a perfect circular logic.

Feminists claim that the reason we live in a patriarchal rape culture is because our society discourages rape victims (always women) from coming forward and also because their words are not taken seriously. So, what they’re proposing is clear: rape accusations should be done anonymously and the “victims” should always be believed against evidences that are biased because… patriarchy.

Men have already lost their jobs, kicked out of school, jailed, and even murdered for false rape accusations while their accusers faced no legal consequences (and got to keep their anonymity). So, we’re not really that far from reaching that level.

4. Feminist Re-Education Camps
image
This book is not a mandatory reading in kindergartens yet. What more proof do you need that we are all oppressed by the patriarchy?

With feminism taking over the educational institutions and already working to reprogram men to serve the system, it won’t be long before men who have been found guilty of misogynist hate crimes to end up in re-education camps. We already have sensitivity training in jobs while colleges are adding courses on toxic masculinity to re-define what it is to be a man on feminist terms. It probably won’t be long before “toxic masculinity” is added to DSM as a mental disorder (in place of homosexuality) and treated like a disease in mental health institutions.

5. Government-Sponsored Feminist Tribunals
image
Canada already has an actual social justice tribunal.

Since it’ll be difficult to charge men of bogus hate crimes against women with nothing more than a woman’s feelings as a proof, the government may introduce tribunals similar to the kangaroo courts in universities and HR departments at workplaces, all in the name of creating a harmonious society free of hate. Those who enter these tribunals will also be destroyed by the media and have no chance of being employed and be subject to permanent social ostracism even if they’re found not guilty.

6. Systemic Castration
image
As I’ve mentioned in my other article, docile and compliant dogs are the ideal that feminists aim for in their efforts to domesticate men. A significant number of boys are already on ADHD medication to have their behaviors controlled while male sex offenders are given chemical castration. If all men are violent hooligans and rapists as some feminists claim, then the next logical step is to let the government control men’s testosterone levels to an “acceptable” level. Note that we already have many parents who are letting their children take hormones to alter their “gender.” This practice will likely become more common in the future.

7. Non-contact Sex
image
“She did not consent; I must not touch.”

Feminists have been so effective in terrorizing the beta males that many of them are afraid to interact with women in any shape or form. Consider that we already live in a world where walking past some deranged woman will get you accused of sexual assault. In the future, all physical contact with women may become sternly discouraged or even forbidden that more men will retreat to porn and sexbots as alternatives. Haptic technology for sex is already being developed to pave the way for a culture of non-contact sex.
8. Bachelor Tax
image
Did you think you pesky “MRA’s” could escape the gynocentric order by refusing marriage and going your own way? With the drop in number of men who are manning up that coincides with the rising number of single mothers who need to leech the welfare state, it’s not too unreasonable to expect a push for bachelor tax that will penalize men who refuse to put a ring on an aging, post-slut sow.

Knowing that it will cause a major backlash, the bachelor tax will probably not come into being in an obvious way. Instead, it will be introduced under the guise of supporting the poor single mothers and helping to foster families. Heck, considering how men are the primary tax payers while women are the primary beneficiaries of the welfare state, you could say that we already have a gynocentric taxation system in all but name.

9. Polyandry
image
Women already practice ‘Alpha fucks, Beta bucks’ strategy. So why shouldn’t an empowered woman be allowed to do it openly without shame?

With the institution of marriage already destroyed and with many men already accepting cuckoldery as the norm in the form of “open marriage,” women may as well be allowed to have multiple husbands. And why not? We already know that there are far too many men for the number of women in our society and that those lazy men should do more to support women. Is it that crazy to have one husband for sex and another three for money? I’m sure many desperate simps will have no issue sharing a wife with several other men as long as they get some cuddling action when she’s not too busy banging her more attractive husbands. The implementation of bachelor tax, mentioned above, will also make marriage more desirable.

10. Concentration Camps For Men
image
The final solution to the testosterone problem.

If the above measures to protect women and ensure equality are implemented, it’s likely that all the misogynists will grumble in anger and resist them. If that is the case, it might be best to take the advice of the feminist, Julie Bindel, and place all men in concentration camps. No man, no problem! If you’re wondering how feminists could even achieve this, know that there is already an army of goons called the police who will gladly do as they’re told to maintain the gynocentric order.

Conclusion

As I’ve said in an older article of mine, feminism is practically a terrorist movement that demands more and more political, social, and cultural oppression of men for the sake of radical women who play the eternal victim and cry for never-ending privileges. While you may think that the above nightmare scenarios are over-the-top and unlikely to happen, I bet those who lived just few generations ago couldn’t have imagined what we’re witnessing today either. Feminism, by colluding with the government, will continue to grow like a tumor and it will not stop until you make it stop.

Remember that if we don’t fight back, no one else will.

Jean-Batave Poqueliche #conspiracy returnofkings.com

12 Methods America Is Using To Turn France Into A Globalist Nightmare

Uncle Sam eats your children and you pass him the salt

Recently, Roosh shared with me an article in three parts on a conference that took place in Paris in 2010, initiated by the US ambasador to France, Charles Rivkin and aimed at many influencal figures of the state. The goal of this confidential conference was to deconstruct the French identity and sovereignty through different actions.

The document was released on Wikileaks and can be found here. It is a written proof of the will of the American government and investors to interfere in the domestic affairs of our sovereign state, something that we see in our daily lives. Here are the fields on which the multicuturalist and globalist decisions maker focus:

1. School

Being a former teacher, I noticed the introduction of constant changes since my youth and the education I received. An even stronger cultural masochism is taught to our kids at school. Racist and racism are the almighty go-to words that instantly discredit the hour-long argumentation of anyone, even when backed with research and scientific proof.

Educational lobbies are changing the school programs to teach the glory of African kingdoms and the expansion of Islam, instead of French history and civilization. Leftists call anyone who wants to focus on native history and its figures a “neo-colonialist.” As French polemicist Eric Zemmour puts it, destroying “the French National epic” and its heroes is the goal. The Rivkin program also includes redefining French history in the school curricula to give attention to the role of non-French minorities in French history.

The decision of teaching more about Arab kingdoms than French kings belongs to the current Minister of education, formerly Minister of Women’s rights, Najat Vallaud-Belkacem, a short-haired Arab woman born in Morocco who became French because her dad worked in France. She is fighting against sexism and inequality, is pro-abortion and stumps for the rights of the gay and transsexual lobby. I am obviously expecting an unbiased decision.

Rivkin states in the report of the conference, that the 1,000 American English language teachers employed at French schools will be provided with the propaganda materials necessary to inculcate the desired ideals into their French pupils.

2. Kids shows

The earlier the better. Back when I was a child, the cartoons I watched depicted mighty heroes crushing the enemy, often bloodily. There was a conflict between good and evil and a lesson taught. The story had a beginning, a chain of events, and an end. Now every episode has too many characters (all diversity-approved) who are often weak, but that’s ok because everyone is nice and worrying about the unknown is intolerant. The creators teach children that being a weakling is not a problem and that working on your looks is not important because true beauty is in the heart.

As the son of an ambassador, Rivkin had no experience in foreign policy and diplomacy. He was appointed because he had experience in including multiculturalist propaganda in kids’ shows and being the CEO of the Wildbrain company, which created Yo Gabba Gabba! among other things. Watch an extract of the show if you don’t know it, you will understand what I mean.

[...]

4. Food

The phenomenon of “malbouffe” (junk food) is smearing our rich culinary culture and became an essential part of our young people’s social life and diet. Coca Cola, McDonald’s, and other giants advertise everywhere and fast food “restaurants” just pop out of nowhere, even in the remote countryside. So does liquid sugar merchant Starbucks and its open support to homosexuals.

Our national agrarian system is now invaded by pesticides and automated agriculture. The opponents of it are quickly silenced. With the GMOed Frankenstein turnips and corn created in American labs, the plants mutate and the people will soon pay the price.

Small local producers disappear and the large companies put what they want in the food. We are still slightly protected by our national laws on food quality and protected labels. But for how long?

5. Influence on native youth

The Hipster-loving, tattoo-sporting, slut-celebrating culture as reached them and they love it. It makes them feel so special. So did lesbian and pansexual attention whoring of the girls, taught by pornography and the Hollywood crowd.

Promiscuity is on the rise, thanks to apps such as Tinder, the fashion of selfies, likes, attention-whoring, nudes sent on smartphones, Sex In The City, Instagram and the promotion of the hook-up culture, even if the young girls become more feminists. It goes only one way: against men.

The destruction of the nuclear family model and healthy relationships between men and women is the objective. The global culture turns our girls into unfuckable modern art masterpieces and our lads into fragile chicken-legged boys in skinny jeans and snapbacks for the urban predator to rob and attack.

6. Hollywood culture

The Hollywood sphere keeps unloading its filth in France. Open homosexuality, metrosexuality, narcotic abuse, along with Pitt-Jolie and their adopted African kids, brought around like a new handbag are everywhere in our tabloids. Everything they do is cool—changing religion like you change underwear, becoming a woman because you are bored, mudsharking, being gay as a three pound note. The words they say are followed by the mass like the bloody Gospel.

7. Destruction of nationalism

The civil rights and feminist movements that trampled the ideas of freedom of association and patriarchy inspired the plague that are the anti-whites of SOS Racisme (oh, the irony) and the anti-heterosexual male feminists of Ni putes, Ni soumises (“Neither Whore nor Submissive”).

Regionalists and nationalist movements and their sympathizers are filed by the police and intelligence services like they supposedly do with the potential jihadis.

Observe what happened in Corsica lately. The police services are moving heaven and earth to find the handful of men that broke into the Mosque and smashed the kebab place, but leave the youths that attacked the two firemen and the police officer that sparked the gatherings of the patriots in the first place. When a handful of Corsicans show more patriotic balls than millions of hand-holding JE SUIS CHARLIEs, there is an issue.

The objective detailed in Rivkin’s report is to monitor and counter any party that does not satisfy their agenda, namely nationalists and traditionalists, dubbing them “racist” and “xenophobic.” The words verbatim: “focusing on the decrease in popular support for xenophobic political parties and platforms.” This is to ensure that the program is working as it should to block the success of any “extreme” or “xenophobic” party that might challenge globalization.

8. Consumption

The consumerism brilliantly orchestrated since the end of World War II started with GIs distributing cigarettes and chocolate to French children after four years of rationing during the Occupation, and continues with the giant American corporations pushing us to purchase things we don’t need. Inside every French, there is an American trying to get out.

The explosion of advertising budgets of the likes of Pepsi, Kellogg’s, or McDonald’s shows it. Some courageous peasants lead by Jose Bové, seeing the threat, tried to take McDonald’s influence apart physically, by crushing one of their joints with their tractors. They failed, as they had limited means compared to the gigantic reserves of cash the corporation had.

Before, the French were champions of recycling and inventiveness. Now they throw away without repairing. There is an obsession with novelty and the newest gadgets. This also helps them collect your data and know your taste so they can propose more things to buy. “Oh you bought X Item, you will also like Y and Z item! Buy, buy, buy!”

9. Influence on non-native youth

The Quick burger chain in France now wants to have the cool halal image and will only serve halal meat in a few years. McDonalds France already serves halal meat but does not advertise it and admits serving it without explicitly warning their clients. So do KFC France and Flunch.

The halal market is a gigantic and lucrative one, as the client that buys it pays a tax directly to the mosques and their private funds on the pretext that they are the authorities that validate every kilogram of halal meat produced. Some large chains of supermarkets focus more and more on their halal clientele. In addition to the sanitary risks of halal slaughtering, the problem is that the natives have to adapt to the non-natives’ diet in the name of equality.

There is also a strong phenomenon of “thugization” of the black and Arab youths in the housing estates of the big cities. All of that thanks to the rap and gang culture, brought by American television shows and the gangsta clips on MTV.

10. Communication tools

The tablets and smart phones reach us younger and younger each year. Every schoolkid that can barely read already has a smartphone, an open door to porn, and the rest. Every family has one, and they replaced the baby-sitters.

Your position is always known thanks to your phone and they will listen to what you say if they want to. They know how many of you are in the house, what is your daily routine, what you buy, and what you read. The algorithms and data are kept.

The policy of “état d’urgence,” initiated following the Paris attacks, allows the government to bypass all the laws about digital privacy on the internet and is directly inspired by the Patriot Act that followed 9/11.

With the development of smartphone video games, more entertainment online, more immersive and time-consuming games where the mind is put on pause, you have fewer people thinking and questioning whoever is in charge.

11. Celebrations

Ah, Halloween. Another hardly disguised consumerist celebration. Occulting the autumn equinox and All Saints’ Day, trampling the tradition of family meals and flowering the graves of our loved ones, one pack of cheap lollies at a time. Overpriced costumes and diabetes for the kids, slutty behaviour and bad decisions for the grownups. Well, at least the pumpkin farmers thank you.

Santa Claus, invented by Coca Cola, pulverized Saint Nicolas that my father used to sing about and greet as a child. The cries of ungrateful brats under the Christmas tree because Barbie’s caravan does not include the picnic table replaced the Christmas carols. My grandfather used to say “When I was a child, we got an orange and a candy stick for Christmas. If we did not behave, we got a bag of coal. So don’t complain.”

[...]

Don’t be fooled—you are next on their list. Their end game is to submerge us into one big melting pot of global consumerism, to uproot every individual from an identity and heritage and replace that with the global shopping mall, and the “global village.”

MarquisDePaid #racist reddit.com

In current culture in the past 10 years especially there is an unfortunate trend of Jewish anti European racism.
In Ukraine antisemitic hate crimes have soared, and the Jewish elites are indeed, confirmed, helping to cover it up because they hate the strong European country of Russia.
In France, many Jews are subjected to horrile hate crimes which are ignored, because the leaders hate the idea of strong europeans. The leaders have other "more important" concerns with anti European political maneuvers and this bullshit hate is victimizing both Europeans and non-elite Jews.
If you are a Jew who denies this elitist problem exists then you are supporting their hate and your bullshit faggoty opinion is irrelevant. I definitely don't hate all Jews but I hate the bullshit Jewish elitism is doing, they are piece of shit human beings and I WILL call them out.

Arthur Miskelly #fundie premier.org.uk

petej: The reason I am confused is that several people have referred to the lesbian family member as your daughter (inc me) and you haven’t corrected them.
So my question, that you keep not answering, is if you believe she is gay because of “nurture” then why do you blame her for it and not her parents?

Arthur Miskelly: Aha, the penny has dropped. Why should I correct them? Her relationship to me is immaterial. The fact is I love her, and we have always enjoyed a special platonic relationship. Still do. Who said that I don’t blame her parents (mother) certainly wasn’t me? Shouldn’t jump to conclusions, should we? Or make judgments before we know the facts. There is a lesson to be learned here.

petej: I’m not saying that you should have corrected them. I’m saying that it confused me when they assumed that she was your daughter.
You haven’t blamed her mother. You have continually blamed her. My question is that if you believe that she is gay because of the way she was raised then shouldn’t you be blaming her parents and not her?
I’m not making judgements. Im asking you questions about your opinions. I’ve asked you several times now. You don’t seem to be able to answer.

Arthur Miskelly: No matter what I answer Pete you will twist it to point score. That is not the reason I entered this discussion. I entered it to minister to souls who are headed to hell because of the devil’s lie about homosexuality. Genises to Revelation tells me homosexuality is an abomination. I can’t change that and no amount of argument will change that fact. I long for her conversion, and surprisingly, I long for yours. I do not wish to see anyone in hell’s torment for eternity. The bible says it, I believe it, end of story. I was under no obligation to correct anyone on their wrong assumptions. I pray you will be blessed and have the scales removed from your eyes.

petej: Im not interested in scoring points and if you think that about me then you have woefully misunderstood me. I am very concerned about the amount of damage ill thought through hostility towards gay people is causing families.
If you genuinely believe that her upbringing caused her to be gay then I think the blame is with her parents not her. Likewise if this church believes that parents cause homosexuality then the parents should be excluded, not their children or their grandchildren.
I dont know you and I dont know your lesbian family member. I do think it would be impossible that you telling her she is going to hell because she is gay will not have disrupted your relationship with her. Likewise my heart goes out to those families who have been damaged by this ruling.
I have read the whole bible through many times and I do not see anywhere where it mentions gay people. There are a couple of verses where same sex sex is condemned (and no doubt we would disagree on the interpretation there). I dont think the point of the bible is to condemn people for personal characteristics or things about them they have no power to change. I think it is primarily about salvation for all people. Sin is largely a matter for chosen behaviours. It seems to me that your family member didnt choose to be gay (even by your own account) and yet you condemn her for it. It also seems to me that the bible calls us to love our enemies and love in the bible means putting other people first, even if we disagree with them.
When I asked how your love for this lady was manifest, your answer was that you were praying for her to become straight. I think a great sin of the modern church is that it is now teaching that love is no more than prayers for salvation or "speaking the truth in love". That is simply not what Jesus taught. It is not what the apostles taught either. It is a teaching that is anti Christian and is damaging our society in very obvious ways.

Arthur Miskelly: The word “couple” is a collective noun, therefore singular and should be preceded by the singular pronoun “is” not the plural “are”. Having got the grammar lesson out of the road, I never told her that her sexuality would send her to hell. I told her that she needed to repent of it. The only sin which sends people to hell is the rejection of Christ’s sacrifice. I really would suggest that you read the posts more carefully, or else you may make a fool of yourself.

petej: You’ve repeatedly implied, if not said outright, that all gay people are going to hell. Orientation is not something someone can repent from because she has no more power to become attracted to men than you do to change the colour of your hair. Blaming her for something that isn’t her fault and that she has no power to change is unfair and it is almost certainly damaging her relationship with you and with God. If you tell people that they have to become straight before they can have a relationship with God then, if they believe you, they won’t have a relationship with God if they are unable to make themselves straight. I’d also like to encourage you to be a bit more civil and respectful to me. I haven’t used any insults towards you so it would be good if you could keep yours to a minimum.

Arthur Miskelly: You poor sensitive snowflake You obviously cannot cope with being in error. In more ways than one.

Some incels #transphobia reddit.com

Re: Reminder, hiv infected trannies are more accepted in this clown world than sub5 men

@albietanders

Gradually I began to hate them

@1-800-jesus-saves

dude seriously. All my life up until the trump fiasco I was totally onboard with the LGBT movement. Now I truly hate them.

@MediumAttention

It's because it's not even any longer a LGBT movement. Genuine lesbians are starting to collect under the banner of radical feminism and are spearheading a surge of anti-trans activism. Gays have long been normalized and some of them as white men are becoming the object of hatred now. Bisexuals were never a thing. The focus of attention rests on the T right now, and the Q and I and A and + and all the other letters of the alphabet that can be used to virtue signal.

@1-800-jesus-saves

the alt-right terf alliance is very strong at least. Im surprised normies aren't resisting this all that much even they know for a fact that if they're reaction to filling their 5 year old with hormones and put them in reverse gay conversion therapy is anything other than absolute excitement and joy, they get ousted for being a bigot. People have no idea whats coming down the line

PaintThemWithBruises #fundie vicious-board.com

Men gave these subhuman pieces of shit rights and Men WILL TAKE THEM AWAY. Unfortunately we exist in an age where we have traitors among us who should be castrated and shot for their allegiance to feminists. They bolster this agenda and give it legitimacy. They side with the stinking cunts. It's criminal and soon we will rectify this.

What has Cosby been doing but exercising his natural right as a Man over the lowly cunt? This is as it should be. In fact, it is a travesty that he needed to use drugs to aid in the process. In a proper world not infected by the feminist plague, a man just rapes a cunt and that is that. If that cunt is another man's property, then this will have to be worked out by the LAWS OF MEN, but the seditious notion that a cunt has autonomy over her body is FUCKING LUDICROUS.

BORN WITH A CUNT. BORN A SLAVE. That's the end of it.

The world won't stay this way for ever. I find it hilarious to think that when the false bubble of our civilization pops and we revert back to our natural order, all the artifice shielding these cunts will drop away and they will realize the only thing they have to protect them against the coming onslaught is a flimsy pair of panties. Feminism doesn't mean shit if Men don't recognize it.

Crush feminism. Strangle it. Make it bleed out its asshole. It is disease and if you are a real Man you will stamp it out in your home, in your neighborhood, your cities, your nation, and the world.

Any of you fucks who have capitulated to these noxious cunts, YOU ARE THE PROBLEM.

No quarter for filthy feminist pigs.

Susan L.M. Goldberg #fundie #sexist pjmedia.com

The irony deepens when one continues to read (not stereotype) the Bible to find that Israelite women didn’t need to waste their time fighting to be equal to men; they were busy fulfilling their own unique role in society. Created with an intrinsic spiritual link to God, women were the first teachers of Torah to their children. They managed their homes, families, and finances. While other women served gods and goddesses by sacrificing their bodies and their children on pagan altars, Hebrew women were called by their God to birth, raise, educate, build, and prophesy to their nation. Long before American women decided they needed equality, Israelite women were divinely empowered.

Yet it’s this revived goddess theology, not biblical feminism, that has trickled down from yesterday’s second-wave feminism into today’s pop culture to the point where the term “goddess” has become a compliment slung about among women anxious to buy t-shirts, mugs, and jewelry encrusted with a term of ancient slavery. Nowhere is the pop-goddess trend more evident than on television, where women continue to be defined and glorified through sexual acts. Paris Hilton, Kim Kardashian, and the “Backdoor Teen Mom” have all reached stardom through cut-and-dry video prostitution, while fictional shows like HBO’s Girls provide more high-brow, intellectual goddess-fodder, which the graduate school-educated critics crave.

Kaykay #fundie answers.yahoo.com

How to deal with the temptation of Lesbianism?

I used to be a lesbian when I was an Atheist. I has multiple relationships with women and men. Now I face that temptation again because of the liberal media.
Television promotes feminist ideas like lesbianism and abortion. According to most TV, women must kill their babies and become a lesbian to become "liberated". That is a lie. Feminism makes women slaves to lesbianism, paganism and abortion.
How should I deal with this temptation? Turning off the TV won't do it anymore. I see pro-gay stuff everywhere now.
I drew a picture to help show this situation with visuals.
image

volthurbrii #sexist volthurbrii.tumblr.com

Liberal Biwomen call themselves lesbians to further validate delusional men in dresses. They played a big role in this bullshit.

I’m surprised there’s even a B in LGB and lesbians aren’t calling to drop the B. Bisexuals have demonstrated time and time again that they frequently choose to side with the straights while demonstrating similar amounts of homophobia.
The majority end up with the opposite sex and biphobia doesn’t exist. They’re oppressed only when they’re participating in a same-sex relationship. Which means they suffer from homophobia during these times only which are overall very rare.

(and those bisexuals who have more in common with gays, more often than not, tend to be gay and come out later on. I’ve seen this before and it became a cliche at some point. Gays and bisexuals experience the world very differently.)

Lesbians have put up with so much homophobia and yet they still try and are expected to be accommodating to bisexuals. But the second lesbians discuss their experiences with homophobia from bisexuals, then it’s ‘all about the mean lesbians and their misogyny’. It’s exhausting. When the majority of your community advocates for corrective rape of lesbians, Idk how you can spin any sort of victim narrative. You should be trashing those bisexuals to hell and back.

When you date a man, you bet your ass doesn’t belong in LGB spaces. The B was meant for those who date the same-sex. You can be an ally but you have no business talking over anyone actually dealing with homophobia.

throwaway680603 #fundie reddit.com

Fuck every woman, they are animals anyways. I have taken a new approach, 11 rejections, no problem, make it 12! I am an intelligent gentleman that needs nobody's confirmation. So I have resort to other solutions, I tried out fleshlights, they feel just terrible, I have tried humping my sofa with lots of lube, my penis started bleeding, and my hand is just too boring. So I have came with a new solution, bestiality. It is completely legal where I live to do it so don't come here and tell me what to do or not, anyway. Which animal has the pussy that feels the closest to women? I have heard that pigs/cows feel really comfortable, but is there any incel with any experience with bestiality? I am not hurting anyone, I will buy a cow/horse and feed it every day and fuck it occasionally when I feel horny or something, but I have heard that it differs from animal to animal. I did also some research and I found it to be a very reliable method, as the cows do not really reject you or walk away, so I won't really be having to introduce myself or do any of that normie shit and just get straight to the fucking. Also dont come with that consensual bullshit, I am sure that they would be more than happy to have me as a partner if they were human. I am also an extremely jealous person and I have thought of getting an alpha cow/horse to let him fuck my partner and I will get angry at him and end up killing him and eating him up, while I forgive my female partner and tell her it is okay. What do you think? My fantasy of beating up chads and getting a woman will be solved in one stroke, I think it sounds great.

Through Melchizedek #conspiracy theoppositeistrue.net

image

This Author, a fully documented, proveable and accurate Visionary for future events, has turned his magnetic mind for Truth to providing real answers to the most controversial subjects prevalent in the world today.

Aside from accurate details Proving the Discovery of The Real Noah's Ark, with chapters like: Heaven, Hell, Life After Death & The Supernatural; The Various Denominations of the Church; Islam and Other So Called Religions; Good Health and Longevity; Feminism, Birth Control and Abortion; Sexual Transgressions, Sodomy and Lesbianism; Languages and Tongues - Their Original Root; Who or What is Really the Antichrist?; Extraterrestrial Life Beyond this Earth; The Root Cause of All of Mankind's Suffering; Armageddon and the Actual End of the World and many more equally challenging topics.

The Opposite Is True will be more than just a Revelation
for you - This is a True Epiphany!

Once you begin this journey, mapped out in the pages within, you will be unable to stop, until the Grand Finale is reached. Then, you will have to conduct a complete reassessment of most of all of the things you actually believe in.

The Real Truth is that a massive deception, on a monumental global scale, has been released on the world stage these past hundred years or so, successfully brainwashing the masses into believing an elaborate labyrinth of fiction, so colossal in scale, it is truly mind numbing...

image