Similar posts

Kevin Rigby Jr. and Hari Ziyad #racist racebaitr.com

We want whiteness banished to history—to an other-space of that which is unknown and impossible. There is no way in which whiteness can move that is freeing or liberating for Black people, so there is no way for white people to free or liberate.

Whiteness is indivisible from white people. To identify as white is to claim the social structure of whiteness, is to always wade in the waters of anti-Blackness. Sociologist Anthony Giddens criticizes our general conceptualization of social structure for having “a tendency to view structure and symbols as somehow alien to the actors who produce, reproduce, and transform these structures and symbols” (The Structure of Sociological Theory, Turner 1991: 523). It is this tendency that so easily clouds our understanding of whiteness and motivates us to embrace white allyship. Black liberation would mean the destruction of whiteness, but whiteness is upheld by all white people. White people cannot escape upholding it.

Constitutive of progressive white people and spaces has always been the question; “How can I, as a white person, work affirmatively in the struggle for Black liberation?” People have engaged this question as a genuine possibility throughout history; of there being a way, however not-yet-understood, for white people to do whiteness well, and, in doing so, aid Black people in getting free. But on a very real level, Black liberation would radically necessitate the refusal of anyone knowing themselves as white. It would mean the actual end of white selves, including the well-meaning white selves seeking the answer to how they can address racism. Black liberation means that white people can only destroy their own whiteness or be destroyed with it. White people cannot exist as white and do anything to address racism, because whiteness in action is racism.

But as much as this argument is a stance against whiteness, it is also a deep affirmation of the totality of Blackness; a declaration that Blackness is enough. More than considering the place or non-place of whiteness, we are concerned with the dream-work of Black folks, that reflexive work we do and have always done trying to better know how to love and be with and in community with ourselves and each other. That work has forever been Black, has never needed whiteness, has best succeeded when we refused whiteness.

There is no answer to the question of what white people can do for Black liberation, but racism veils reality so easily and efficiently. It is anti-reality. It makes the impossible seem not only possible, but a worthwhile endeavor. It truly does keep you, as Toni Morrison said, “from doing your work. It keeps you explaining, over and over again.”

The dilemma of what white people should do to address racism has the same exhausting function of racism, because this dilemma is racism. Because for white people “to do” anything means that whiteness must be centered in a way that would perpetuate its oppressive essentiality.

There is nothing redeeming or redeemable about whiteness—by definition. Only the radical negation of it is helpful or freeing. And it is not enough for us as Black people to encourage or allow white people to try their hand at addressing racism. It is necessary instead to adopt a politic of exclusion. This is to build upon Malcolm X’s claim in The Autobiography of Malcolm X that “Where the really sincere white people have got to do their ‘proving’ of themselves is not among the black victims, but out on the battle lines of where America’s racism really is,” (X, Haley 1964: 383–384) with the vital understanding that Black victims exist everywhere whiteness does.

Therefore, white people should move comfortably in neither Black spaces nor white spaces. Even those who are well-meaning should drive themselves into the ground trying to figure out how to occupy a positive whiteness—because it is impossible. Only in this frenzy, when the sense of order that is critical to whiteness turns to chaos in every place, can the motivation to destroy it overcome the compulsion to reform it.

Contending that whiteness has no value or role in the struggle for Black liberation is an immense claim, but it is a necessary one if we are to be free. The sooner we take seriously that Black people are the best articulators, dreamers and fighters for the future in which we are liberated, the closer we are to the manifestation of freedom. Important to remember is what is made possible for Black people, is made possible for all people. There is no need to consider how whiteness can operate in this. It can’t. It shouldn’t. It won’t in any future in which we are free.

The question of “doing whiteness well” is a question which centers a discussion about Black liberation on the actions of white people. We know that white people maintain hegemonic presences in all institutional forms of power. So, to have a conversation about white people working for Black liberation is to have a conversation predicated on the need for white people to wield institutional power and influence to help Black people. In this context, white people maintain systemic power, and Black people are the recipients of their benevolence. That white people might maintain power in shaping and dreaming up Black liberation is counterrevolutionary. Black liberation must always center on the assault against and defiance of these institutions. “We do not negotiate with terrorists.”1)

Indeed, when we’ve seen white people try to do whiteness well, try to operate their spheres of power and influence well, we’ve also seen the martyrdom of Black women murdered by police to bring white people to reckon with their sins. We’ve seen white men starting campaigns professing the beauty of Black women, only to soon after realize it came hand in hand with the violent claiming of and sense of entitlement to Blackness and Black bodies.

This is all to say, importantly, that whiteness cannot be done well, cannot be done without violence or without being in opposition to Blackness and Black freedom. But the extent of this lies far beyond ashy campaigns and disturbing open letters begging other white people to atone for their sins using the blood of Black women. We must critically engage the possibility that whiteness is only violent to Blackness, is only and can only ever be antithetical to Black liberation.

That we conceptualize whiteness as having a positive operation in the fight for Black liberation is perhaps the single greatest success of the normative functions of a colonialist State. That is to say, we have been successfully hoodwinked to believe that which harms us most vitally might also be able to save us.

“Rather than emerging from a scientific perspective, the notion, ‘race,’ is informed by historical, social, cultural, and political values,” writes Teresa J. Guess in The Social Construction of Whiteness: Racism by Intent, Racism by Consequence, “thus… the concept ‘race’ is based on socially constructed, but socially, and certainly scientifically, outmoded beliefs about the inherent superiority and inferiority of groups based on racial distinctions.” What this means is that race is designed as a hierarchal structure, and whiteness is constructed for no other purpose than to occupy the space of racial superiority. Therefore, to exist and act as white is to reinforce the dominance of whiteness.

Indeed, there would be no white race, no “race” as we know it, if whiteness weren’t positioned in violent dominion. That is the only thing it can do. Whiteness cannot operate in any way that does not first perpetuate white supremacy.

This, of course, is not to say that white people have not been the conduits for necessary Black liberation work. White people surely played integral roles in the freedom rides, abolition movement and the Civil Rights movement. But those roles were meticulously crafted by the toils, lives, death and suffering of Black people. The energy forced through those conduits was painstakingly produced by Black folks. To credit it as anything else is to fall prey to the same tempting veil of racism that motivates us to seek the impossible from our white allies. White people playing a role in liberation work are always merely actors, and the work done with them always done entirely in spite of their whiteness, not because of it.

All ways of addressing Black liberation for which white people are praised is always work Black people—Black poor and working class women, trans, non-binary, disabled and queer people especially—have already done and been doing and have made possible for white people to know.

Even John Brown, the white abolitionist who was executed in 1859 after leading an insurrection against pro-slavery forces, furthered the legacy of the likes of Nat Turner and other Black folks who fought and died for their own freedom before him. We must be sure in recognizing that dying for freedom did not begin with Brown, was not his legacy to create. Though perhaps in death, in a significant sacrifice of self, he and those like him have shed light on what it could mean to give up whiteness for good. When whiteness is so seeped into your being, might giving it up necessitate a threat to one’s safety and existence?

And where do white people exist in safety? In settler colonial societies, positions of power are designated and protected for whiteness. Perhaps the only action white folks can take—barring physical disappearance—in the struggle for Black liberation, for them to successfully put an end to their own whiteness, is the absolute absolving of their places and power. Their literal disappearance from the State and its institutions. It is worth exploring what this would mean for the the persistence of capitalism and the State. Is demanding the destruction of whiteness from the State to demand the destruction of the State, which was created by and has only ever known itself in service to (and in tandem with) whiteness? Which, each together, have only ever worked to maintain capitalism, anti-Blackness, and the disappearance of Indigenous people?

As John Stanfield writes in Theoretical and Ideological Barriers to the Study of Race-Making, “Racism and race-making are part and parcel of the manner by which major industrial, European-descent nation states such as the United States have originated and developed” (Stanfield 1985:161-162). This is how capitalism, anti-Indigeneity and anti-Black racism are intrinsically tied. None can exist in any way that is good for Black people. The presence of each is specifically predicated on Black subjugation.

After whiteness is obliterated, at that point, what the people who now identify as white should do is a giant theoretical exercise: what comes after whiteness? How does someone become not white? That is the legitimate and critical work of many. But our focus is always on Black folks figuring out new and better ways to get free—independent of white people and capitalism and the entirety of western empires. We are confident that our dreamings of freedom can crumble whiteness, capitalism and empire without giving deep consideration to the question of “what do we do with it”. We’re only interested in the work of building past it.

Kevin Rigby Jr. and Hari Ziyad are Black, queer, non-binary dreamers who, in some reality not yet here, are married, gendered or ungendered without colonial restriction, and free.

Robert Smith #racist amren.com

How a Young Black Man Became a Race Realist

I am a 21-year-old black man. I am an atheist, a registered Republican, and a member of Mensa. Already a minority within a minority within a minority, I have yet another idiosyncrasy that puts me in an even more unusual category: I am a race realist. I believe that consistently observed racial disparities in societal outcomes are largely rooted in genetic differences, primarily differences in average levels of intelligence.

High school

This was the first time race predominated in the social climate. I started to notice people self-segregating along racial lines. But most confusingly, black students who did not conform to stereotypes were considered “Oreos:” black on the outside, but white on the inside. I remember the following comments:

“You’re so quiet. Do you consider yourself black?” This from a white classmate, genuinely confused as to why I bucked the general black trend of rambunctious and loud behavior.

A white classmate says something racially offensive in my presence and another asks, “Why would you say that with a black person standing by us?” Answer: “It’s fine; he’s white at heart!”

An Asian classmate: “You’re an embarrassment to your race.”

A group of black students are listing black classmates whom they think act white, and include me: “Yes, he’s white on the inside. He has no accent and hangs out with too many white boys.” (The person who said that flunked out at the end of the school year. He enrolled in a predominately black high school and went to an HBCU. Two months ago, as of this writing, he was killed in a black-on-black crime. There were no protests or riots carried for him, since his death could not be made to look like black victimhood. He got nothing but a few people on Facebook posting his obituary. Maybe he should have acted more “white.”)

I not only saw blacks accuse other blacks of “acting white,” but, even more often, I saw whites accuse their black friends of “acting white.” My Asian friend — of whom I was quite fond — would often say that he didn’t consider me black. I found this extremely puzzling. To me, “acting white” meant being an Uncle Tom — someone who is intentionally betraying his race and cares more about the approval of whites than of other blacks. Being called an “Uncle Tom” is definitely not a compliment. In fact, it is one of the harshest insults for a black person.

The self-hating black person is derided in black culture, as in Uncle Ruckus from The Boondocks and Clayton Bigsby from the Dave Chappelle Show. Many blacks would rather associate with a murderer than with an Uncle Tom. This is not mere hyperbole. The black community eagerly embraces thugs and criminals who destroy their neighborhoods while it ostracizes its most principled members — educated and conservative blacks.

Even more confusing, I noticed that the more intelligent blacks would be particularly prone to accusations of “acting white.” All my life I had believed that trying to come across as an intelligent and civilized person, working hard, speaking standard English, assimilating into American society, not playing the race card, and not acting like a minstrel show character were characteristics of intelligence — not traits associated with any particular race. That ghetto blacks would accuse others of “acting white” I could, to some degree, understand. After all, the more academically oriented blacks did tend to associate more readily with white people than with other blacks, who tended to be ignorant. But what was truly mind-boggling to me was how whites and Asians could accuse blacks — even their own friends — of “acting white.” Why did they mock their black friends for doing what they were supposed to do? Why were intelligent and civilized blacks so often called race traitors by both blacks and whites?

Like an idiot, I succumbed to this pressure. I came to view hard work and academic success as “white” activities. I began to take school and life less seriously, approaching it with a half-hearted attitude, as if giving it my all would be “white,” and antithetical to the very core of my identity. I tried to the greatest extent possible to distance myself from my white classmates — not a good idea at a school that is 90 percent white.

I ended up graduating nowhere near the top of my class but still got into an elite college due to affirmative action and good test scores. I felt a bit guilty for gaming the system, but I felt I experienced discrimination — because of the “acting white” comments — and affirmative action was my way of getting back at an unfair system. (The same college also gave offers of admission to two other blacks from my high school. Their level of achievement was, obviously, high by black standards but also nowhere near the level that would have been required of a white or Asian.)

College

In college it soon became clear that I was woefully mismatched. I began to doubt whether I was smart enough to work at such an elite level. Perhaps the problem was me, not society.

Other black students were constantly on the watch for imaginary racism. They felt so self-entitled they drew up a document intended to force the school to accept more students and hire more professors from underrepresented races.

I doubted my abilities to such a great degree that I decided to get my IQ tested. My FSIQ (full scale IQ) was 141 — 99.7th percentile!

image

I have included my hand in the photo to confirm that I am black.

Acting white

For years I was convinced that the major cause of black social pathology was this “acting white” accusation and the phenomenon of having to “prove” one’s blackness. It had certainly had a great effect on my life and impacted other high-IQ blacks around me. However, one day I came across a brilliant article by Steve Sailer addressing this topic.

He made the incisive point that doing well in school would not be considered “acting white” if blacks and whites had the same average IQ. That was my turning point. I realized that this was not a discrimination issue at all or even evidence of racial bias. What my white and Asian classmates meant when they accused blacks of “acting white” was not to call them “Uncle Tom” or “race traitor,” but something more along the lines of “you act more like a stereotypical white person than a stereotypical black person.” Factor in the differing average IQs, and it’s no wonder why the more intelligent blacks are often accused of “acting white.”

Of course high-IQ blacks will tend to associate more with a group that has an average IQ of 100 than a group with an average IQ of 85. This “acting white” phenomenon is exactly what one would expect when groups differing as significantly in intelligence as do black and whites co-exist: Behavior that is associated with intelligence becomes associated with whiteness.

I am now amused by how difficult it is to separate behavior that is stereotypically black from behavior that is generally associated with low IQ: making poor life decisions, failing in school, getting in trouble with the law, being loud and obnoxious, speaking poorly, promoting destructive and ignorant behavior, etc. Conversely, it is difficult to distinguish behavior that is “white” from behavior that reflects high IQ: being polite and civilized, showing emotional restraint, working hard, speaking articulately, being educated, being goal-oriented, listening to classical music, etc. It’s as though everyone subconsciously picks up on the IQ differences even if they don’t explicitly realize that what they’re noticing is different levels of intelligence.

I continued to study the question. I found that that other black members of Mensa are commonly told they are “acting white.” This pattern holds true throughout the world. High-achieving blacks in Britain hear the same thing. Successful Brazilian blacks are called the complimentary term “black with a white soul.”

I learned that literally everywhere in the world where blacks are found in large numbers, they exhibit lower rates of educational success and higher rates of criminality than other races. It’s no mystery why blacks who buck these trends are seen as different from other blacks.

I got my own DNA tested. I found out that I am 25 percent European — which is to be expected among American blacks. More interestingly, I learned that I was in the 96th percentile for Neanderthal ancestry among African-Americans. I find it amusing that I’ve so often had my blackness questioned; I’m unusually high in genetic material that is completely absent from pure Africans.

Compelling quotations

Here are a few observations by blacks that have stuck in my mind.

“Most of the people who were popular in my high school are either dead or in jail.” — my aunt

“This area was so nice when white people lived here.” — my grandmother, driving through a black ghetto

“I have been called ‘white’ my entire life. It’s a shame that just because I didn’t get high, skip class, and steal from the corner store I was thought of as a lame individual.” — a female cousin

“It’s not too often we get a young brother like you here. You’re proper. Most of the young black men I know besides you are thugs.” — a middle-aged black man I met during a summer internship

“N*ggers are terrible.” — my father, who often comes into contact with ghetto blacks in his line of work

“If it’s stupid, they like it.” — my grandmother, referring to young black people

“Why do we always have to come up with dumb shit?” — my extremely militant and pro-black uncle, lamenting black people’s proclivity for ignorance

It’s IQ, not racism

I now have no doubt about race realism. All the lines of evidence, from history to life experience, point to the same conclusion. All the usual excuses for black dysfunction are epiphenomenal and stem from the basic fact of lower average black IQ. Others viewed us as inferior because we never developed the wheel, a written language, a calendar, a mechanical device, or a two-story building. Slavery happened because whites (and Arabs before them) were able to enslave blacks; they had better technology and capitalized on the lack of black cohesion. Historians estimate that 90 percent of the slaves shipped to the New World were first enslaved by other Africans. (This is also consistent with Phil Rushton’s application of r/K theory; Africans have always shown low in-group preference.) All the usual explanations for black failure melt away once the fact of lower IQ is acknowledged. Anti-intellectual culture, poverty, bad schools, single-parent families, lack of role models, you name it — they are exactly what you would expect in a population with a lower average level of intelligence.

I certainly have learned much more about how the world actually works from great men like Phil Rushton, Richard Lynn, Steve Sailer, and Jared Taylor than I have ever learned from hucksters like Ta-Nehisi Coates, Jesse Jackson, or Al Sharpton. One might find race realism to be a depressing worldview; of course no one wants to believe that his race is much less intelligent on average than other races. But I truly believe that if you evaluate the evidence from an unbiased perspective and use logic rather than emotion, you cannot come to any other conclusion.

Furthermore, a worldview that takes into account human biodiversity is certainly more realistic and even hopeful than eternally yearning for whites suddenly to “wake up to racism” or voluntarily renounce their thirst for destroying “black bodies” — something Ta-Nehisi Coates thinks comes naturally to them. It is more hopeful than waiting for blacks around the world to stop creating “cultures of incompetence,” for which they seem to have quite a knack. It is more hopeful than waiting 250 years for the achievement gap to close or 228 years for the black-white wealth gap to close.

I now know what would theoretically be needed to close these gaps: a higher black IQ. I am free of any resentment against whites, for no matter how bad slavery, Jim Crow, or any other misdeed that whites are frequently made to feel guilty for, blacks around the world are infinitely better off than they would have been if whites had simply left them alone to live in mud huts and tote spears in Africa.

I feel empowered, for I now know that there is no impenetrable wall of white racism holding me back. In the words of the founder of logic, Aristotle, “The high-minded man must care more for the truth than for what people think.” If admitting the truth makes me an “Uncle Tom,” so be it.

As for my uncle’s question, “Why do we always have to come up with dumb shit?”, applying Occam’s razor will yield an elegant and parsimonious answer.

george00,SINCERITY.net #racist 4racism.org

Wally Wally:
(from amren: “james-watson-wont-stop-talking-about-race” story)

The trouble is that about 65% of whites and about 99% of blacks will hear what Mary-Claire King said and think that it's a good argument against what Watson said even thought it has absolutely nothing to do with what Watson said. And another thing, why would any logical white person, who wants the white race to survive, want the average black IQ to be equal to the average white I

Fact: average American black IQ is 15 pts lower than average American white IQ. However, individually, there are many blacks who are a lot smarter than whites and vice versa. Furthermore, most blacks in America have sufficient intelligence to live productive lives, no different than a broad segment of whites who have ordinary IQ levels.

Perhaps you could explain, why disparate average IQ levels between American blacks and whites is SO important to you and your race realist brethren?

george00:
What a fantastic question but do you really need to ask? I give you exhibit A: Planet Earth. Look around it. The darker the skin of the people who predominate in any country the more poverty and crime. Don't bother with the world just limit it to the United States. The darker the skin of the people who predominate in any city and the more poverty and crime. I could go on breaking things down for you but hopefully to can see the pattern.
And yes the average black has enough intelligence to live a semi-productive life but only because he is surrounded by white people and an infrastructure invented and sustained by whites. How would this average black guy be doing in Africa? Not so well. Right?
I could answer you in another way. WLP gave an excellent talk on this subject but almost all advancements have been made by whites in the genius IQ range. If whites on a large scale interbred with nonwhites this would pull the number of whites in the genius IQ range down and grind all advancements to a halt. It's complicated.

Wally Wally:

A prevalent belief amongst race realists is: “black people aren’t smart enough to exist in 1st world societies” and “have a propensity for committing crime”. Based on this belief, they feel a segregated America should be revived. A very large number of productive blacks in America unequivocally destroys that belief. Reasonable, unbiased people of all races see blacks daily participating in the American dream.

The darker the skin of the people who predominate in any city and the more poverty and crime.

I’m a black baby boomer who grew up in Washington DC on the tail end of segregation. As was true with most cities with black populations, with the advent of integration, blacks who could afford better moved out of the cities, leaving a concentration of poor blacks. Many of the blacks that moved out now live in middle class suburban black neighborhoods. Contrary to popular (race realism)belief, cities like Washington DC have many areas that are populated with middle to upper class blacks, with poor blacks living in pockets.

And black crime: the second weapon of attack used to justify a return to segregation. “Blacks have a propensity for committing crime”, like black intelligence “facts”, it’s a “fact” unsupported by scientific research.

The bulk of crime being committed by blacks is being committed by young black males involved in drug gang violence. Young black gangsters are protecting the very lucrative profits generated by the black market enterprise: DRUGS. The same phenomena existed during prohibition when young white men were committing crime and violence against each other at exorbitant rates, protecting the very lucrative profits of that other black market enterprise: ALCOHOL. Black market enterprises that generate large sums of cash tend to attract large scale violence. Lucrative cash, not genetics, is responsible for much of the crime and violence in black communities.

And yes the average black has enough intelligence to live a semi-productive life but only because he is surrounded by white people and an infrastructure invented and sustained by whites.

Semi-productive? The average black has enough intelligence to live a productive life, no different than the average white. Race realists like to push the myth of – most whites being intelligent enough to invent the marvelous technologies we enjoy – but the truth of the matter is, most whites are quite ordinary when it comes to IQ, as capable of sustaining a society as most blacks and would be lost too if forced to sustain their surroundings. You race realists live vicariously through the achievements of your more talented brethren(whose numbers are relatively small in number).

SINCERITY.net:
First I repeat, I would rather see the discussion on the top where I opened the same topic. This discussion here is buried very low, nobody will find it.
WallyWally, do you understand the scientific method? Most anti-racists keep making unproven statement and guesses. If you say what is PC you can make unproven statements or prove them with pseudoscience. Have you read Richard Lynn's books like "IQ and the wealth of Nations" who has clearly proven the statement that the darker the skin the lower the average income and gross national product of countries and regions
A few middle class blacks, who run away from their lower IQ high crime brothers to hide in white/Asian neighborhoods or the rare black middlle class region don't fix black AVERAGES of crime, school dysfuncion, and welfare.
Als WallyWally, be honest. Like Obama, and Sottomayor, you probably benefitted from a life of constant affirmative action. Even the vote for Obama was mostly BECAUSE of his skin color.
Again, I suggest we continue the conversation above on the new post that I started
By the way, read Sincerity.net

Wally Wally:
Middle class blacks are no different than middle class whites when they choose to purchase homes in middle class neighborhoods, black or white. Middle class whites don’t purchase homes in poor white Appalachian neighborhoods, they purchase homes in middle class neighborhoods. Why should our(black) purchasing strategy be different than yours(white)?

The bulk of crime in inner city neighborhoods is mainly driven by black market forces: DRUGS in particular, the same black market forces that drove white prohibition era crime. The high crime rates are certainly not a result of a 15 point difference in average IQ between blacks and whites.

Your(race realist) claim: “lower IQ is responsible for the education gap between blacks and whites”, is unproven and nonsensical given there are more plausible explanations for the gap. How much IQ horsepower is needed to sufficiently master the K – 12 education curriculum? Unless you know the answer to that question, you can’t begin to make your claim regarding IQ and the education gap. Poor parenting(single, barely of age, mothers), violence infested neighborhoods, the misguided distructive belief: “studying is ‘acting white’, are much more plausible explanations for the educational failures in inner city neighborhoods.

george00: An ordinary IQ for whites is 100. An ordinary IQ for blacks is 85. Whites are much more capable of sustaining a society than blacks. Most whites plan their lives around avoiding blacks. That's why there's white flight. The reason for white flight is pretty much illustrated by the type of conversation we are having right now. I'll say something and then you completely don't grasp the implications of what I just said. There's a reason why blacks create s---hole countries and cities and neighborhoods and schools. There's a reason why nonwhites are risking everything and doing everything to get into white countries on a massive scale. White geniuses make advances that are sustained by average whites. Blacks have demonstrated that they are incapable of sustaining even basic white standards. Look at what happens to the white colonies of Africa after the whites leave. You have nothing to base your arguments on except there are a lot of blacks who are being productive at jobs they got from whites after they rioted and burned the cities down in a massive symbolic strong armed robbery maneuver. That's your argument and it sucks.

Wally Wally: . I'll say something and then you completely don't grasp the implications of what I just said.

You make claims (e.g. – “Blacks have demonstrated that they are incapable of sustaining even basic white standards”.) for which there are glaring counter examples for refutation. It’s hard to take race realism seriously when you engage in constant hyperbolic propaganda.

george00: You keep wanting to take what blacks do when the blacks are sustained by whites. White people are employing blacks. It's a matter of frequency. The frequency of examples supporting your claims are much lower than the frequency of the examples supporting my claims. Blacks are parasites on whites. Whites would be much better off without blacks and blacks would be much worse off without whites.

SnowWhiteQueen #racist stormfront.org

Re: Black female university journalist writes that it's racist for White males to exclusively date White females

Where are all of these white men who only date or prefer white women? I seriously doubt any white man ever told her that he only dates white women.

I see white men with black women all the time where I live. It's the latest trendy interracial couple and has been on the rise for about 10 years in my town.

As for this idiot and her whining.

At the root of your exclusion of women of color from your dating pool

All white men should exclude 'women of color' form their dating pool.

Further, straying from white women as your partners of choice could have dastardly consequences that result in the dilution of your family and your own perceived whiteness.

Yes, racemixing will kill off white people. White people need to see that the only thing dating or marrying interracial will do is result in the death of European people. Any white person who doesn't see this or doesn't care is an idiot.

And perceived whiteness? No you fool. European people exist genetically like any other race.

and white privilege is as valuable as gold in a country overflowing with Trump apologists and white resentment.

There you go again getting hung up on this fictional non-existent white privilege and blaming it for why white men choose to date white women. In your stupid ignorant mind the only reason any white man would ever prefer white women is because of white privilege.

Many women of color are encouraged from a young age to use skin-lightening creams, use apps to make their eyes wider and conform to white societal standards of beauty. The entire world is tied into this white privilege.

Boohoo cry me a damn river. Black women are the ones who choose to adhere to these beauty standards. No one forced them to. You black women only whine about white beauty standards because you know that 'black is beautiful' is a bunch of bull**** and an attempt to make black women feel better. There is a very good reason that a whole entire industry exist around making the hair of black women look nothing like real black African hair. And that's because black women know that that black peoples hair is complete crap and they have to change it to look nothing like their natural hair. Don't blame white people for the beauty standards you choose to copy.

Saying that you prefer certain women to others not only reinforces stereotypes about women of color, but white women too. Arguing that you prefer white women based on the presuppositions that white women are inherently more beautiful, passive, kind or financially-stable is — you guessed it — racist!

And not only is it racist, but it’s insincere.

Who cares what black women think is racist? They think everything they don't like or agree with is racist.

It's not a stereotype to say that white women are more beautiful, kind and passive than black women. It's the truth most of the time.

And black women are the last people on earth who should be complaining about stereotyping people or being insincere.

So she's trying to nag and White-Guilt some poor sucker into dating and/or marrying her. Yeah right.

And it'll probably work. I have no doubt some wimpy white male loser will date her. I see it all the time where I live. I can't go anywhere now without seeing some loser white male wimp out with his hideously ugly black girlfriend.

Black females have like a triple race card they play. They get mad when White men won’t date them. They get mad when Black men pretend to like them and then bang them but then leave immediately and turn them into single mothers. They get mad when Black men date White women. But when a Black woman is somehow able to date a White man, they oooohh and aaahhh over it like it is the most amazing thing on earth, because they know that the best a person can get for themselves is a White. Black women (and men too, but mostly women) were the most hysterical about Meghan Markle marrying Prince Harry. It was all they talked about on Twitter for months. They think that just because we have now broken some kind of magical race barrier because a sheboon married a White prince, that somehow this fantasy can possibly happen for them too. They believe that maybe White men may be more open to dating them now because of Prince Harry. But that was a one time fluke, and Harry most likely has undetected tumors or cysts in his brain that caused a severe lapse in judgement. Either way. They are already having marital problems, even the lying Jew press admits it here and there. I don’t expect them to last more than five years, even though they are now unfortunately having a kid together. Blacks are even saying on Twitter that they hope the kid comes out really dark skinned, just to rub some more crap into the Royal family’s face. They really can’t get over this psychotic love and hate thing they feel for us.

Black females are a bunch of hypocrites. When it's white women dating black men they whine about how white women are stealing black men from black women. As if black men can't decide who they want to date and have to be manipulated into dating white women. But when it's black women dating white men that's ok, not a problem at all.

They see black women dating and marrying white men as a way to get back at white women who they can't stand, as a way to push black women as being better, more attractive and more desirable than white women and as a way to get their filthy hands on the white man's bank account. For black women dating or marrying white men is about revenge and money.

Some white men will go along with this and date or marry black women, if only because it makes white men look progressive and anti racist. Throwing their genetics into a pile of dung all so they can be seen as progressive and get liberal and multicultural brownie points.

It’s already being said that if a man doesn’t date a “transgender woman” he’s a bigot and transphobic.
When You Say “I Would Never Date A Trans Person,” It’s Transphobic. Here’s Why.

I would never date a guy who dated anyone transgender. Eww! That's just nasty. But if white men are stupid enough to date black women then dating trannys is just right around the corner. That will be the next dating trend. Men dating girly dudes instead of real women.

thrasymachus33308 #racist deconstructingleftism.wordpress.com

Stories about blacks getting into confrontations with cops, security guards, store owners and others are so common as to be hardly worth mentioning. And yet there is a basic reason for this, which should be understood by all who share any social space with blacks.

A former cop, FBI agent and current criminal defense attorney, Dale Carson, wrote a book called “How to Arrest-Proof Yourself”. I read this and found it very interesting, as it talks about what cops are actually doing on the street. According to Carson, cops look for certain high-profile behaviors and stop those people.

I mentioned the book in comments on Lion of the Blogosphere, and he read it and became a big fan. Living in a high-density urban environment where this plays out every day, but where most of the population studiously ignores that it is happening, I can see how this would be very interesting to him.

To summarize the book- if you are going to do anything illegal, do it inside, out of public view. Don’t drive an old, beat-up car, and definitely not with a bunch of people in it, that is a cop magnet. If you are stopped by a cop, be polite and try to end the encounter as quickly as possible.

Toward the end Carson digresses and addresses the issue of why blacks have much more trouble with the police than whites. His answer is that whites mostly follow his advice, and blacks don’t. Whites of the type more likely to have legal trouble- Carson works in Florida, so these people would be called crackers or rednecks- drink or smoke dope inside their homes, rather than on the street, carry knives rather than guns, drive by themselves or with one other guy in a pickup, have wives or girlfriends who help keep them out of trouble, and don’t get confrontational with cops. Blacks do frequently the opposite- drink or smoke dope on the street or in their front yards, carry guns, ride with four guys in an old sedan, and have girlfriends or baby mamas who really don’t care if they are locked up or not.

Carson seems to ascribe this behavior to ignorance by blacks, but I think there is a totally different cause. For blacks, dominating and acting out in public, social space is an end in itself. It is about power and control for them. And they are very successful at it, because any space where a black person appears will mostly be controlled by that black person- they will intimidate whites and Asians in that space, although maybe not Latinos.

Think about it- if you see a black in a public space, you are going to steer clear of him. He might not be trouble, but he might, and the hassle is not worth it. It could be something major, it could be something minor, but that’s up to him, and what kind of a mood he is in that day, and if he’s in a screw with whitey mood, you are in for some heartburn you don’t need.

Black behavior to own and control a social space varies from just hanging out, to hanging out and talking loudly, to being very physically active and boisterous, to play-fighting, standing in the middle of spaces intended for walking, walking four abreast down a sidewalk, walking in the middle of the street, stopping a car in the middle of the street to speak with someone walking in the street, stopping a car in the middle of the street to talk with someone in another car also stopped in the middle of the street- in general, many uses of social space not intended by the white designers, and regarded as inappropriate and selfish by white cultural standards.

Blacks get away with this first by their childishness and playfulness- reprimanding children is something whites do reluctantly, although blacks don’t hesitate to harshly punish misbehaving children. One black will not be challenged because whites rely on general social pressure to enforce most rules, rarely confronting people directly. Two or more blacks will not be challenged, because blacks play off and reinforce each other, and challenging them will most certainly result in a loud, angry confrontation. Challenge three blacks and physical violence is almost probable.

Blacks in social space are in their kingdom, but every kingdom has borders that must be jealously protected. Surrender is frequently the strategy. Too many blacks, and whites leave. Blacks are the reason for the demise of the indoor mall. In the ghetto, authorities tolerate and accept this kind of behavior, because most of the residents are black and the community supports it.

Sometime however there will be some push back. As Sailer has reported, in some middle-class black Detroit suburbs, the residents have reacted negatively to the arrival of ghetto blacks and their norms. Because all parties are black in this case, it can be described as a culture clash, although the middle-class blacks moved to the suburbs precisely for a white social environment.

Sometimes blacks will rub up a little too hard against whites, and store manager, security guard, or perhaps even a police officer will ask or tell the black person to move, quiet down, or leave, and the black person will respond aggressively. The ability to intimidate whites is very important to all blacks, and they work in concert to maintain this. I suspect that in each situation, the goal of the black is to create as much pain for the white authority figure, without actually getting into legal trouble. The black may not want a ticket, a summons, or an arrest, but is not particularly afraid of these either. A confrontation with a white authority figure is a great experience for a black, gives him status and prestige with other blacks, and if he is arrested gives him even more. From a white logical standpoint, legal trouble is to be avoided whenever possible, but from the black standpoint, while it has personal costs, it also has personal benefits, and benefits blacks as a whole, by discouraging confrontation by whites, however justified.

This kind of simple enforcement of social norms by authority figures is what is constantly attacked by blacks and white progressives as evil, racist police harassment. But as I have shown, it is normal for this behavior to be tolerated in most instances. It is sometimes still necessary to tell people to not do things. Blacks will complain that the police don’t ticket whites for drinking beer on the sidewalk, but that’s because whites don’t drink beer on the sidewalk- they do it on their couch, in their backyard, or maybe on the front porch, but never on the sidewalk. Blacks could do the same, but they like the idea of making the public space of the sidewalk into their own personal space.

I wrote about this in detail some time ago about the Trayvon Martin case. I find myself repeating myself because of a few more recent news items, each itself completely unremarkable, but showing this pattern. My answer is the same now- make a habit of questioning and confronting blacks, if only by eye contact. Blacks need to broken of the habit of casually intimidating whites, if only by letting them know they are being watched. Any obnoxious or illegal behavior should be referred to the police or other authorities.

Blacks like to use the word “peace”, but peace to them means exactly the same thing it does to Moslems, which is submission. You can be at peace with a black if you submit to him, he of course the sole judge as to whether your submission is complete or sincere enough. It’s a losing game, so don’t submit at all.

MarineSentinel #racist freerepublic.com

White democrats, liberals, elitists, leftists, progressives, left wing-nuts, communists, socialists, gays, lesbians, leftist loons, mentally handicapped—meaning their vocabulary is so small it would fit in a navel cavity of a flea, Nazis, republican rhinos who are really democrat insider fools, traitors, anti-Americans, and yes last but not least my favorite—lying maggot politicians are the most racists individuals around. This is a fact that these racists purposely try to shove off on their opponents namely Conservatives. The truth hurts and if ever there was a time where racism is more visible than today it is none other by these kooks I’ve mentioned.

Dr. Ben Carson a renowned neurosurgeon who put it truthfully and factually that “Liberals are the most racist people there are.” He is right and they can’t deal with a black man telling the truth about them and how they really think. This isn’t something new; these crazies have always been racists who date back to the “KKK” and slavery. They are the ones responsible for the many deaths associated with and committed by the “KKK” period. Dr. Ben Carson has made all of these kooks nervous and they don’t know how to deal with him especially coming from a successful educated black man.

I recently saw this racism on full display yesterday when a known liberal such as Bob Beckel went nuts over Dr. Ben Carson telling the truth about liberals. Bob Beckel said about Carson, that most liberals don’t care what he Carson says or thinks. This was his whole point genius Beckel couldn’t wrap his mind around that “White liberals and the rest of these kooks don’t care about blacks or other minorities who are different from them, ergo he and his “White liberals are racist.

The reason the liberals and the rest of their kook fringe are after Dr. Carson is they view him with the Uncle Tom tactic they tried with Herman Cain. Its funny how these crazies call us racist but when a decent Conservative black man who believes in God and tells it like it is they turn the table on him. Dr. Martin Luther King said it’s not the color it’s the content. This alone sheds 100% light on their racist’s views. Dr. Carson is the mesquite thorn in the racist lefts a**, both uncomfortable and poisonous which the truth does that.

Dr. Carson revealed what a loser Obama and his ilk really are; at the bottom of the barrel if you ask me. The liberals and the rest of these kooks are scared of him because he is a brilliant man and he is everything that they and Obama are not. Obama and his ilk=affirmative action and Dr. Carson=All Merit. The liberals and the left remain on their road to destruction and they are dragging the country down with them. The true Patriots of America must do all they can to take back our country.

I recently read a column about Dr. Ben Carson’s up and coming book where he makes a great and valid point. He says that it is just as much about racism to vote for someone because he is black, just because he is black even though you don’t agree with his politics. I have never voted this way for any President and those who have should be ashamed. Liberals may not care what Dr. Carson has to say now, but soon they will know if they don’t already he is their worst nightmare. Dr. Ben Carson is a prime example that America truly does work and liberals despise him for it. This President really thinks “White Liberals” actually like him. I’m here to say NOPE, they don’t. They are just using him like Bob Beckel to help him bring down the country. I say keep talking “White Liberals and the rest of their kooks, you are making our point.

The flip side to “White Liberals” is the “Black Liberals” who espouse to the same playbook. These crazies have fallen into the trap of actually believing “White Liberals” care for them when in reality they think blacks are not capable of doing things on their own. “White Liberals” truly believe that if you’re not white you are not capable. Why else would liberals demand affirmative action? Affirmative Action has done nothing more than exacerbate black poverty period. Look at most poor neighborhoods; they are all Democrat represented areas, Always. “White Liberals” always pat you on the head and tell you you’re so brilliant, but not brilliant enough to get anywhere on your own. We 20 years later have a President reaffirming everything we know to be true about “White Liberal” mentality. From his lips to our ears—“You didn’t build that, you didn’t get there on your own.” Molon Labe.

Robert Hampton #racist #sexist #wingnut amren.com

White Women Are in an Abusive Relationship with the Left

The Left can’t hide its contempt for white women. “White women are lucky that we are just calling them Karens,” Washington Post Global Opinions Editor Karen Attiah said in a since-deleted tweet. “And not calling for revenge.”

Miss Attiah, who is black, blamed white women for “the 1921 Tulsa massacre,” the “murder of Emmett Till,” and the “exclusion of black women from feminist movements.” She was also angry that “53% of white women vot[ed] for Trump.”

Miss Attiah didn’t back down in the face of criticism: “I’m just saying. Be happy we are calling for equality. And not actual revenge.” She eventually deleted her tweets, but she didn’t recant. In a follow-up, she promoted the “Karen” meme because it shows “how everyday white women uphold white supremacy through violence, aggression, and the weaponizing of their gender.”

The Washington Post editor is not alone. The Karen meme, which ridicules white women for upholding standards, is popular. Time published an article last week that praised the abuse of “Karens” because it lays bare the “violent history of white womanhood.” Teen Vogue published a piece attacking white women for upholding “white supremacy.” Bloomberg produced a video this week that demanded “White Women Privilege” be dismantled.

The Left heaps scorn on white women, even though they are increasingly the Left’s most devoted foot soldiers. Compared to 2014, 38 percent more white women think police killings are part of a broader problem rather than isolated incidents. This explains why most whites have a favorable view of Black Lives Matter. White women are common at many BLM protests. White women with college degrees favor Joe Biden over Donald Trump by 39 percent. Younger white women hold more liberal views on race, immigration, and social issues than young white men.

If white women are loyal to the left but the left scorns them, they are in an abusive relationship. Here is a mental health organization’s description, of an abusive relation. As you go down its checklist, it all fits:

Possessiveness

The Left thinks it owns white women and can order them around. There is a whole genre of articles telling white women what to do:

“White Women: We Must Stop Being Amy Cooper”

“America is at its breaking point and white women still won’t stop frivolously calling police on black people”

“Shaming white people might stop some of them from calling 911 on us”

“White women need to be better allies to women of color”

“How White Women Can Be Better Black Lives Matter Allies”

“White Women Need to Check Their Privilege After the Women’s March”

Jealousy

The Left has never forgiven 53 percent of white women for voting for Mr. Trump in 2016. It latches on to this like a dumped lover who can’t get over an old text message.

“The 53 percent had once again sold out their sisters in the service of the patriarchy, an especially egregious sin in the wake of the #MeToo movement, which has exposed widespread sexual harassment and assault among powerful men in the workplace,” Washington Post reporter Vanessa Williams wrote in 2018. This particular “sell out” — which could have been anything — was the fact that a few white women senators voted to confirm Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court.

“[A] a vocal segment of women of color, especially black feminists, are saying, hold up, pump the brakes,” The Undefeated writer Lonnae O’Neal said in a 2016 article called “The 53 percent issue. ”While white feminists are issuing all-hands-on-deck calls to stand against a Trump presidency, these women say, they haven’t worked hard enough to even win over a majority of their own ranks.”

Vogue bitterly asked in 2018: “Why Do White Women Keep Voting for the GOP and Against Their Own Interests?” Journalists view white women as if they were unfaithful lovers.

Put-Downs

Leftists love to insult white women. That is why the “Karen” and “Becky” slurs are so popular. Both are ways to bully white women. I wrote in June: “The ‘Karen’ meme normalizes contempt for white women. It stops whites from doing something when they see suspicious non-whites.” “Becky” is no different. Like an abusive lover, the Left insults whites and tries to make them submit.

Threats

Threats against white women are becoming more common. Miss Attiah’s tweets are just one example. More ominously, there could be legal penalties for white women who call the police on blacks. Amy Cooper, the “Central Park Karen” who called 911 on a black bird watcher in May, was charged with filing a false police report. She already had lost her job, suffered extreme harassment, and may be banned from Central Park for life.

San Francisco is considering a new law called the CAREN Act, which would criminalize “racially biased” 911 calls. The name stands for Caution Against Racially Exploitative Non-Emergencies and is inspired by the “Karen” meme. White women are clearly thought to be the problem.

Even a camera can be used to threaten white women. Last month, a black man in Seattle followed a white woman to her home after a traffic incident. He accused her of using the N-word and pulled out his phone to videotape her. The woman, realizing she could be the target of a video that could ruin her life, burst into tears and pleaded with her accuser that she was not racist. White women better get in line, or else.

Physical Violence

Some white women even suffer physical violence from the Left. Rioters beat a disabled white woman on camera in Minneapolis in May. The mob cheered on the black attackers as they punched her and emptied a fire extinguisher into her face. The woman was reportedly trying to stop a black mob from looting a Target.

A few days later, black rioters attacked a white woman who was riding her bike. A white man tried to fend off her attackers with a hockey stick. Rioters attacked him too.

Black looters beat an elderly white woman in Rochester, New York after she tried to stop them from attacking her store.

Rioters have surrounded white women in their cars and threatened them. A white mother in Fredericksburg, Virginia, begged police to rescue her and her child when rioters mobbed her car in June. The police did nothing.

It would be wrong to blame white women for any of this. Women are more conformist and submissive than men. They bow to what they think is powerful, respectable, and authoritative. It is not their fault that ideas that are destroying our country and our people have become authoritative. It is men — white men — who let that happen. Women will not change until we change.

Question Diversity #racist #wingnut amren.com

RE: Some Democrats Are Bothered Nominee Is an Older White Man

More whites than blacks or Hispanics claim to be bothered.

About seven-in-ten black (72%) and Hispanic (70%) Democrats say they are not bothered the likely nominee is a white man in his 70s. By comparison, white Democrats are divided on this question: 49% say they are bothered and 51% say they are not.

Then there was this from last week. Not stated in this telling, but the research broke it down by sex, and it found that white extremely liberal women are significantly more mentally ill than white extremely liberal men, but even white extremely liberal men were significantly more mentally ill than all the other race/sex/politics category.

Overall, I think, the main reason why everyone else but white moderate liberals and white extreme liberals have roughly the same mental illness rate, while white moderate liberals and white extreme liberals are much higher, is that current year left-of-center ideology is constituted such that white people who ascend to it must necessarily actively and overtly and consciously operate against their own actual or perceived racial interests. Non-white liberals (moderate or extreme) aren't so mentally ill, because they're operating in their own racial interests. I think if you brain scanned white extreme liberals and compared them to parents who murder their own children, you'd see just about the same thing going on.

https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2020/04/does-liberalism-cause-mental-illness.php

CertifiedRabbi #racist reddit.com

There's glaring holes in the left's philosophy on segregation. The most obvious being their belief that every single racial group on this planet is inherently biologically equal in every way - at least when it comes to cognitive ability, since they don't seem to really get too worked up over the argument that blacks make the best sprinters and long-distance runners.

If every single race on this planet really was biologically equal in every way and the racial differences that we observe were merely the result of cultural, historical, and environmental influences (almost all of which, according to the left, ultimately boil down to White people being at fault), then what's the argument against racial segregation in the modern era?

If blacks and Hispanics are just as innately capable as Whites and East Asians of building and maintaining highly advanced societies with good schools, a diverse array of private businesses like tech companies and car manufacturers, and competent governance, then why would the creation of a black ethnostate within the Americas or Africa be a bad thing?

After all, both blacks and White shitlibs are constantly whinging about White privilege, racist cops, racist juries, racist judges, racist teachers and school administrators that are unfairly disciplining and marking down black students, racist university faculties that are discriminating against black students and black faculty, racist hiring practices and portrayals of blacks in the media, racist award ceremonies, et cetera. That's a lot of systematic anti-black racism!

White privilege and anti-black racism is not only systematic but omnipresent in the leftist worldview. And according to mainstream leftist philosophy on racism, every single White person on this planet is inherently and incurably racist. So, if you actually believed that, then why on Earth would you want to subject black people to that sort of racist oppression by forcing them to live in the same societies as Whites? I mean, even in South Africa where Whites now only comprise about 8% of the population, White shitlibs and blacks are still constantly whinging about inherent White supremacy and White privilege horribly affecting black South Africans - which implies that those problems will pretty much always exist as long as White people are still around, even in very small numbers.

Wouldn't it make a lot more sense to help blacks to completely escape the evaaal clutches of Whiteness by helping them to create their own ethnostate where they'd be free to have their own police force, their own courts, their own education system, their own financial and business sectors, their own media, their own government, and their own culture?

Of course I'm not the first person to make these points. Segregationists made these same exact arguments several decades ago, and the left responded to them by arguing that the separate but equal policies of the American segregation system still discriminated against blacks in numerous ways. For example, I remember being brainwashed in school about how black schools would receive the worn down chalk and old text books of White schools under these separate but equal policies. And the desegregationists argued that Whites had free access to all of the best agricultural land, businesses, schools, and government institutions under segregation - which made black inequality and failure inevitable.

Well, what if we could fix all of those problems by ensuring that black schools received not only the same amount of funding per student, but even more funding per student than White students? What if we ensured that this black ethnostate had access to arable land, trade ports, and natural resources? And what if we Whites agreed to give this black ethnostate a huge amount of financial and technological aid every single year in order to ensure that they had a good economy? And what if we agreed to do this for the next 500 years in order to more than compensate for the legacy of colonization, slavery, and discrimination? How would that be immoral or oppressive towards blacks in any way?

To reject that extremely generous arrangement, you'd have to lack confidence in the inherent aptitude of blacks to govern themselves and maintain a highly successful society. And that's the real underlying source of contention here. Deep down, both White libcucks and blacks know that blacks simply aren't capable of keeping up with Whites. I mean, there literally isn't a single highly successful black country anywhere in the entire world - which strongly points towards chronic black failure being biological rather than environmental. And the ugly science of intelligence testing proved that blacks really are inherently mentally inferior to Whites. And that's the dark undercurrent of this whole debate over segregation; both White shitlibs and blacks know that blacks tend to descend into 3rd world status when they're left to their own devices. And so that's why they view access to Whiteness as a fundamental human right that everyone on this planet is born with. And that's why they're so militantly opposed to segregation.

And the other dark undercurrent of this whole debate over segregation is how the left is using the concept of racism in order to destroy the White race. As I stated earlier, according to the mainstream leftist view on racism, all White people are inherently and incurably racist. And so if White racism and bigotry is the worse sin imaginable, and all White people are inherently and incurably racist and bigoted, then the only way to solve the problem of Whiteness is to completely destroy the White race and Western civilization. That's the real end goal here in this supposedly "noble" "anti-racism" (i.e., anti-White) "human rights" crusade; removing all obstacles to open borders, mass immigration, forced diversity, miscegenation, and wealth redistribution by demonizing, pathologizing, and literally criminalizing White racism and racial segregation.

Relentlessly crying about White racism and bigotry - both its omnipresent and everlasting nature - while simultaneously doing everything that you can to shove as many non-Whites as possible into White societies (including White schools) only makes sense if you lack confidence in the ability of non-Whites to create their own equally successful societies and are cynically exploiting the greatly exaggerated specter of White racism and bigotry in order to subvert the interests and very existence of the White race itself. If the races really are equal at the genetic level, and if White supremacy is an eternal evil, then you should actually support ethnonationalist movements like the Alt-Right and racial segregation in order to fully liberate black people. If you take leftist philosophy on race seriously, then opposing this form of benevolent segregation is a form of anti-black racism and oppression.

I also want to preemptively respond to anyone that would argue that agreeing to financially support this black ethnostate for hundreds of years is absolutely retarded because it would cost us billions upon billions of dollars.

Alt-Hype did a great job of estimating the fiscal impact of each race (excluding Asians) on America's annual budget. According to his very conservative estimates, blacks in America are taking at least $306.53 billion more out of the U.S. budget every single year through various handouts than they contribute through taxes. And according to his estimates, it's probably closer to $389.71 billion! And that doesn't even include our extremely generous foreign aid packages that we're sending to black countries all around the world. So, blacks are already costing us an absolute fortune every single year.

And so we'd actually probably save money if we agreed to give this black ethnostate $250 billion annually for the next 500 years. Heck, I'll be generous and agree to give blacks even more than that. How's $500 billion every year sound? Fuck it, have a full 1 trill every single year. If that's how much we have to fork over in order to entice blacks to finally get the fuck away from us, then so be it.

Also, you simply can't put a price tag on removing the cancer that is blackness from our society. We know for a fact that blacks are having a dysgenic effect on our gene pool. And according to Richard Lynn, the hidden crisis of dysgenics is affecting black Americans even more than it is White Americans. And so the chronic problems of black failure are just going to get worse and worse for us as time goes on. Jared Taylor also did an absolutely fantastic job of identifying the hidden costs of racial diversity in his opening remarks on a debate over whether or not racial diversity is a strength.

And while it's become popular to celebrate the cultural contributions of black Americans in recent decades, I don't see how it's possible for any sane and rational person to pretend that mainstream black culture (i.e., degenerate black hip hop [lack of] culture) has had a positive influence on America, Whites, or the world as a whole.

So, to White identitarians like us, preserving the uniquely beautiful White phenotype and bringing back our traditional high culture is absolutely priceless.

Gonzo #racist libertydwells.com

The simple fact that the leftist trolls here support programs that are supposed to "address racism" show that they themselves are the racists that they claim to despise.

The Leftists fully back "Affirmative action". A RACIST program that mandates that an unqualified black person must be hired over a qualified white person because (AND ONLY BECAUSE) of the skin color of the two parties involved.

It's perfectly FINE to tell a white man "You can not have this job because you are white". But it's NOT ACCEPTABLE to tell a black man "You can not have this job because you are black". And somehow, the left calls this "equality".

When the subject of "Abortion" comes up, the leftists will ALWAYS scream for "abortions on demand", and yet, it's been shown that "unchecked abortions" kill BLACK UNBORN CHILDREN at a far higher rate then WHITE UNBORN CHILDREN. Of course, this is used to prove how much the liberal LOVES the minorities.

Yet when a conservative seeks to end abortions on demand, the conservative is responsible for PROTECTING multitudes of BLACK UNBORN CHILDREN, and yet they are STILL called "the racist party".

Liberals seek to keep Black Americans chained securely to the plantation. Insisting they keep themselves dependent on the Federal Government for all their basic needs and the majority of their WANTS (free cell phones anyone?) and they're looked at as the party that LOVES minorities.

Yet Conservatives seek to get Black Americans to be self reliant, and dependent on NO ONE, and they're "racists" for not giving in to the "I WANT, I WANT Tantrum" of the inner city minorities.

White liberals LOVE to insist and convince Black Americans that they (the Black Americans) are unable to compete or thrive in life, with white people, so they (the Black Americans) must rely on the Liberals help to "stack the deck" against those evil white people, because they (the Black Americans) are FAR TOO INFERIOR to compete on an even field.

And the blacks LOVE them for that.

You know, I think the liberals have me convinced.

The "Black Americans" ARE too inferior. They ARE unable to compete. They DO NEED to remain on the plantation, because they will never survive in a world where they have to rely on their own intelligence (of which, according to Liberals, they have very little), or their own merits. They (Black Americans) DO need Abortions on demand. Because it's obvious the "savages" do nothing but eat and breed, and there needs to be Liberal checks in place to manage their population. because they're far too inferior, ignorant, and lazy to self regulate their "reproductive urges". I guess they're a lot like Rodents in that regard.

Congrats Liberals. You've convinced me. I fully agree with you that an entire race of people on this planet, (that is, an entire race of dark skinned savages on this planet) needs to be federally regulated and supervised based on their inferior intellect and inability to regulate their own base instincts.

You've won the argument. Blacks ARE inferior to whites.

Anonymous #racist misterpoll.com

Have you ever noticed how BADLY black men want White women?? It's the proverbial "every negro's dream". Despite the quantifiable fact (check the next US Census or this url: http://www.census.gov/population/socdemo/ms-la/tabms-3.txt if you're skeptical) that 95% of people in America marry within their own racial/ethnic group (i.e. Whites w/ Whites, blacks w/ blacks, Asians w/ Asian, latino w/ latino), black men still demonstrate a stronger preference for White women than men from other racial/ethnic groups such as Asian or latino.

People are naturally attracted to people who share their physical characteristics. Although I'm able to appreciate the beauty of women from other racial/ethnic groups, I feel no strong, compelling impulse to reproduce with someone from another race. For example, I can tell you from a personal perspective that a tall White male with blue eyes, fair skin, and light brown/blond hair is going to experience the highest sexual attraction possible to a tall White woman with similar attributes. It's only natural, and similar to the preference that light-skinned negroes exhibit for other light-skinned negroes.

So why DO black men want White women so BADLY??? Poor, pathetic black women spend millions (collectively) every year for products to straighten their hair, EVEN DYEING IT BLOND IN SOME CASES, in an effort to look like a "White woman" so that they can attract and maintain a relationship with a black man. I want to offer some insight into this phenomenon.

1) Fat lips, kinky hair, and broad monstrous noses - While these physical characteristics may understandably be considered attractive in certain areas of Africa, they are considered unattractive to other races. The black men simply don't want to curse their descendents with physical traits that are regarded as unsightly by the dominant races, so they endeavor to dilute their African genetic code with a European genetic code. They want a daughter who looks like Mariah Carey or Vanessa Williams, rather than "Aunt Jemima" or the woman who gave birth to (professional basketball player) Patrick Ewing.

2) What better way to get back at "Whitey" for slavery, elevate your status among the "homeboys", and bolster your negro self-esteem, than to have sex with a White woman!!! Never mind that most of these White women are overweight, ugly, have low self-esteem, or have been rejected by White society for some reason and therefore must "settle" for a black man out of desperation... White is White!!! It still gives a reason for a homeboy to dance and clap in the pews at church and shout "Glorbee Hallelujah!!!". It's just a shame that these homeboys regard black women as "second-rate".

3) Forbidden Fruit - (this matter is somewhat complex) As American adolescents enter puberty, they begin to notice and explore media images (TV shows, movies, magazines) of attractive members of the opposite sex that are used to sell products such as candy, soft drinks, acne medication, clothing and anything else that teenagers can purchase with their disposable income. Because of the fact that America is approximately 75% White, and for obvious economic reasons, most of the images used in the mass media are of attractive Caucasians. This is probably the source of the black man's "fixation" on White women, and ultimately the source of great frustration for the male negro. This frustration is caused by societal pressures on white women to not be "social failures" who date negro men, hence the "forbidden fruit", and because the vast majority of White women are not attracted to negro men for the same reason that White men are usually not attracted to negro women. If you don't believe that White men (horny or not) are not attracted to negro women, consider this... How many WEALTHY White men (who are usually favored by most women of any race) do you see marrying or even dating black women??? The "trophy" has always been a young, attractive White woman, and I guarantee you that this situation will never change.

4) Evolution - Perhaps it's an effort to "evolve" and advance their race. In the black man's estimation, a kid who is 50% white is better than a kid who is 100% black (or has two parents of primarily African genetics). When comparing the number of engineers, doctors, lawyers, scientists, published authors, and successful business professionals who are White verses the number who are black... even Snoop Doggy Dogg could do the math on that one. If the black man wanted black kids, he would pursue a BLACK WOMAN, but knowing that he can never become "white", he does the next best thing. The so-callled "black pride" is sacrificed as the pursuit of the White woman becomes the negro's Holy Grail. The negro males just want to secure for their offspring what they either consciously or subconsciously perceive as "better genetics", i.e. the genetics of better looking or smarter people. If they thought black women were the other half of the "formula" for producing attractive and intelligent children, they would pursue BLACK WOMEN.

If a literate negroid has read this far, he is probably trying to console himself by asserting that White women have sex with black men because of large black genitilia. First of all, ask any gynecologist and he/she will tell you that a woman's vagina comes in a variety of shapes and sizes. Most women do not have a coarse, oversized vagina that needs a freakishly large genitilia to be properly filled. Given that a woman's vagina can expand to accomodate the birth of a baby, and that many women enjoy digital and oral stimulation, size issues are irrelevant. Furthermore, check out any of 10 billion porn sites on the Web, and you'll soon discover that a White man can posess very large genitilia. The myth of the black male genitilia is just that, a myth.

However, other than running and jumping ability, most negro men just don't have much else in which to take pride, so they obsess over their genitilia and live their lives in a state of permanent adolescence. REAL sexual satisfaction has everything to do with an emotional/spiritual connection, and NOTHING to do with the physical aspects of "gettin' a groove on", and this is why most White women avoid black men.

John Derbyshire #racist conservative-headlines.org

[From "Racial Separation — Or Freedom of Association?"]

Several listeners to last week’s podcast took exception to my casual dismissing of the idea of racial separation—see [b]“Taking A Knee”—Is Racial Separation The Answer?[/b]

I had said that separation is no more feasible now than it was in 1862, when Abraham Lincoln urged it on the freedmen leaders he’d invited to the White House. [Address on Colonization to a Deputation of Negroes, Abraham Lincoln, August 14, 1862]. “We must struggle on forward as best we can, white and black alike,” I concluded.

I think those listeners had been watching American Renaissance Editor Jared Taylor's recent video titled [b]How to Achieve Racial Separation[/b]. Jared makes the case that we can peacefully separate into monoracial regions.

[...]

Don’t forget: Hardly anyone predicted the breakup of the Soviet Union, or of Yugoslavia, or Czechoslovakia. And all three countries separated along national and ethnic lines. And people who once had to live together are happier living apart.

How to Achieve Racial Separation Jared Taylor, American Renaissance, October 3, 2017.

Now, Jared has no greater admirer than me. As I have told him myself: If our republic survives, there will be statues to Jared in public squares one day.

I’m sorry, though, guy: This just won’t fly.

Take that first clip I just played: “For blacks to live independently of us …” But blacks can’t live independently of us. They don’t have the human capital to live independently of us.

There is some black human capital: brilliant, high-minded, public-spirited blacks. They are just too few among their own people. Google “Smart Fraction Theory,” or see What Brought Down Detroit from the transcript of my July 27th, 2013 podcast. For a society to function well, to be stable and prosperous, you need a certain threshold proportion of smart people. If your population’s smart fraction is below that threshold, the society won’t work.

I’ll quote myself here, if you don’t mind; from a VDARE.com column three years ago:

Think of it like this: A man is walking along dragging a sack behind him. If the man is large and the sack small, it’s a nuisance but he can make progress. A small man dragging a large sack is, however, severely encumbered.

White populations of course have members with low scores on behavior, intelligence, and personality, but not so many that the more capable whites can’t “carry” them. Smart and well-socialized blacks, by contrast, are numerically far fewer in proportion to the great sullen lumpen-negretariat they drag behind them.

Kicking The Stone: The Hard Reality of Race Relations, November 6, 2014

Of that fraction of blacks with something on the ball, all but the most saintly and self-sacrificing will decamp to the nearest nonblack area, as you see happening today across the Mediterranean. Jared’s white enclaves are going to need some very serious border control. His proposed multicultural enclave, where people who want diversity can enjoy it, will get way less diverse really fast. It’ll just turn black.

There is simply no stable solution here. Whites don’t need blacks, but blacks need whites, if they are to have any kind of civilized life.

Jared’s second clip is similarly flawed, even setting aside the mayhem that attended the breakup of Yugoslavia. The racial gap in what was formerly Soviet Central Asia is nowhere near the size it is between American blacks and nonblacks.

So, sorry to Jared and those of his followers who emailed in, but on the matter of separation: no sale.

I do, though, fully agree with Jared on the desirability of striking down all legal constraints on private freedom of association. Forced racial integration is an outrageous assault on our liberties.

With freedom of association restored there would, I believe, be enough voluntary separation to lower the racial temperature and ease us forward to the calm acceptance of reality that the race issue so badly needs.

Townhall #fundie townhall.com

The Democrats are said to be the party of Jim Crow, black codes, and the Ku Klux Klan—but it’s the GOP that’s racist, or something. These historical debates get the Left and Right going on social media. Yet, a new study just slays the whole notion that liberalism is averse to racism. It’s the seat of irony. The report found that white liberals dumb themselves down while interacting with minorities in order to get along with them (via Yale Insights):
Racial bias can put people of color at a disadvantage when interviewing for a job, buying a house, or interacting with the police. New research suggests that bias may also shape daily interactions between racial minorities and white people, even those whites who tend to be less biased.
According to new research by Cydney Dupree, assistant professor of organizational behavior at Yale SOM, white liberals tend to downplay their own verbal competence in exchanges with racial minorities, compared to how other white Americans act in such exchanges. The study is scheduled for publication in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
While many previous studies have examined how people who hold racial bias behave in multi-racial settings, few have studied how whites who are more well-intentioned interact with people of other races. “There’s less work that explores how well-intentioned whites try to get along with racial minorities,” Dupree says. “We wanted to know their strategies for increasing connections between members of different social groups—and how effective these strategies are.”
Dupree and her co-author, Susan Fiske of Princeton University, began by analyzing the words used in campaign speeches delivered by Democratic and Republican presidential candidates to different audiences over the years. They scanned 74 speeches delivered by white candidates over a 25-year period. Approximately half were addressed to mostly-minority audiences—at a Hispanic small business roundtable discussion or a black church, for example. They then paired each speech delivered to a mostly-minority audience with a comparable speech delivered at a mostly-white audience—at a mostly-white church or university, for example. The researchers analyzed the text of these speeches for two measures: words related to competence (that is, words about ability or status, such as “assertive” or “competitive”) and words related to warmth (that is, words about friendliness, such as “supportive” and “compassionate”).
[…]
The team found that Democratic candidates used fewer competence-related words in speeches delivered to mostly minority audiences than they did in speeches delivered to mostly white audiences.
Gee—I wonder why white liberals feel the need to dumb themselves down in front of non-whites. Is it because they find them…incompetent? That appears to be the case (via Washington Times):

“It was kind of an unpleasant surprise to see this subtle but persistent effect,” Ms. Dupree said. “Even if it’s ultimately well-intentioned, it could be seen as patronizing.”
The study flies in the face of a standard talking point of the political left—that white conservatives are racist—while raising questions about whether liberals are perpetuating racial stereotypes about blacks being less competent than whites.
[…]
The researchers then set up an experiment in which white liberals were asked to respond to hypothetical individuals named “Emily” and “Lakisha.”
“[L]iberal individuals were less likely to use words that would make them appear highly competent when the person they were addressing was presumed to be black rather than white,” said the release. “No significant differences were seen in the word selection of conservatives based on the presumed race of their partner.”
Ms. Dupree said the “competence downshift” could indicate a greater eagerness by white liberals to connect with those of other races.
“My hope is that this work will help include well-intentioned people who see themselves as allies but who may be unwittingly contributing to group divides,” said Ms. Dupree. “There is a broader need to include them in the conversation.”
Still, a white liberal making him (or her) seem dumb because they find the non-white they’re interacting with less competent. That seems…pretty racist.

Cambria Will Not Yield #racist cambriawillnotyield.wordpress.com

The Ebola “crisis” is not a new crisis; it is part and parcel of the liberals’ assault on the white race. Just as whites are forbidden to protect themselves against the deadly assaults of black barbarians roaming the nations of Europe, so are whites forbidden to protect themselves from the deadly black Ebola virus. This assault on the white race, the Christ-bearing race, is wrong from the standpoint of the Christian faith, but it also goes against the liberals’ stated faith, which is to love the negro with their whole heart, mind, and soul. If they truly loved the negro they would have taken the trouble to know him. And then they would have kept him in captivity and not left him to his own devices. “Because of slavery,” the CNN reporter said. Yes, because of slavery the black man actually had a longer life expectancy than the white coalminers in the North, and he was made to stay with his family instead of roaming the streets, killing and raping white people and forming umpteen polygamous families.

What has Africa become since the liberals of the West “gave Africa back to the blacks”? In Africa: A Political Travelogue, Thomas Molnar points out that the most poorly developed, diseased-ridden, poverty-stricken nations in Africa were the ones that were outside white control and white influence. Independence? What is independence for the blacks? It is the absence of white restraint, which means blacks are free to destroy themselves and whites through murder, mayhem, and hideous diseases, which are the result of their desire for unbridled murder, mayhem, sexual depravities, and bestiality. If the white man does not control the blacks, they will destroy themselves and the white race. That is the reality that goes against the liberals’ faith. It is their utopian belief that once the black man is free from white restraint, he will “astound the world.” So said the late John Paul II who was not the first nor the last negro worshipper to occupy the chair of St. Peter. Shouldn’t a “Christian” whose Lord said, “I am the truth, and the truth shall set you free,” be interested in the truth? Yes, a Christian should be interested in the truth, but a utopian needn’t be interested in the truth at all. He sees everything in the light of his utopian vision. Hence the great divide between the anti-Christian Christian clergymen and the Christian Europeans. The former have exchanged Christ for the negro, and the latter are still connected, through their people, to the Christ, the Son of the Living God.

The Ebola crisis in Africa and its spread to the West is simply another hideous manifestation of the liberals’ revolt against the God of Christian Europe. In old Europe men and women suffered and died as they do today, as they have always done since Adam and Eve disobeyed God. But the men and women of old Europe, of Christian Europe, did not suffer and die without hope and without experiencing genuine moments of joy in between the suffering and dying. Because they had faith in Christ’s resurrection from the dead, they had hope that the joyous white moments here on earth were a prefiguration of an eternal life where there are only white moments and no more suffering and death.

The liberals’, in their desire to create a kingdom of god on earth, the negro god, have created a world without white moments. There is no joy amidst the pain and suffering, because there is no hope that there is a Savior who will redeem our pain and suffering and turn our white moments on earth into eternal white moments in heaven. A liberal cannot have white moments, because he has lost all contact with the God who lives in and through His people. The liberal can sneer at everything decent and honorable, which gives him a certain perverse pleasure, but it is nothing akin to joy. And the liberal can sing hymns of praise to his black gods who will rule over a new Babylon consisting of midnight trysts under the palms and endless wine and cheese parties. Is that not paradise? No, it is not. There is a certain unhallowed thrill in tasting previously forbidden fruits, but we have already seen how quickly forbidden fruits become bitter ones. The liberal has written his own death sentence, and like his devilish master, who also wrote his own death sentence, he is bereft of all joy here on earth; he’ll never have white moments of grace, and he is without any hope for the next world. Was Dickens so wrong for feeling that a Christ-centered non-utopian Europe was still better than Satan’s brave new world of sneering death heads?

CH #racist heartiste.wordpress.com

White liberals would be more ethnocentric in their own society. Part of the reason they are so outgroup-favoring in our societies is the fear of us.

So if you never had to fear “The Handmaids Tale”, you would feel less inclined towards white guilt. Additionally, the Bluestan(s) could write constitutions that explicitly define the fundamental values of society as left-liberal, so White Bluestanis could have a strong civic nationalism.

Look over the border at President AMLO, a white leftist, but also a strong ethnic and civic nationalist.

216 is an interesting commenter, but I believe he inverts the underlying motivations of Bluestan shitlibs here.

First, you won’t get anywhere analyzing White shitlib (SWPL, for short) behavior without understanding that psychological projection is at the heart of it. White liberals don’t fear White conservatives. Not really, at any rate. They may virtue signal fear of us, but they don’t really feel it.

What White liberals are doing is projecting their own desire, to viciously and utterly rule over White conservative “intransigents”, onto the latter. White libs accuse White cons of doing to them precisely what White libs do to White cons. If any group has justifiable reason to fear a despotic overthrow of its cherished values and preferred social arrangements, it’s White conservatives who have been under relentless attack from White liberals for the better part of a century, and losing nearly every battle.

Case in point: there was never a “Handmaids Tale” in America. There has been, however, a “SlutPride Tale” and gay marriage and trannyfreak singing to schoolchildren and borderline infanticide and man-hating divorce courts and toxic masculinity conspiracy theories.

White liberals have in fact never had to fear “Handmaids Tale”, but White cons have had damned good reason to fear all of the above, because those things have actually happened. And yet, White cons aren’t “outgroup favoring”, presumably, as leverage to neutralize the power of White libs. White cons have had to fear all those White lib depredations on their preferred way of life, and yet don’t have any “White guilt”.

216’s theory doesn’t hold up under scrutiny.

White liberals did not live in a constant state of fear in pre-Roe v Wade America that a patriarchy was about to force women into breeding camps. Any “fear” that White liberals express about America becoming a version of, in this example, The Handmaid’s Tale is either irrational or disingenuous. The purpose of the lib fear-mongering amongst themselves is 1. to juice their virtue signaling score (the more fearful, the more valuable one’s moral posturing against the thing causing the “fear”) and 2. to provide a phony justification to ram their shitlib agenda down America’s throat.

White liberals — GoonWhites — aren’t outgroup favoring because they fear White conservatives — FreeWhites. No, White libs are outgroup favoring because

they have inherited an excessive altruistic feeling toward outsiders that is corrupted into a pathology by globalist mass migration
they get a tingle up their legs from playing the role of the beneficent enlightened betters patronizing POC lessers
they HATE HATE HATE FreeWhites for not sharing their r-selection-shaped worldview or their high disgust thresholds, and find it expedient to “adopt” nonWhites and their grievances and to use them as battering rams against FreeWhites.

For these reasons, I doubt White liberals would be more ethnocentric in their own societies. Instead, what I see happening is GoonWhites’ virtue signaling compulsion turned on each other, in the absence of FreeWhites to target, until the purity spiraling results in some sort of social breakdown or mass hysteria/mental illness.

I also foresee Bluestans eventually succumbing to their Diversity, which will eat at the White lib seed corn with increasingly ravenous disregard for the future. Remember, too, that “strong civic nationalism” and multiracialism are mutually exclusive; civic fellow-feeling is always and continually undermined by the very human and natural urge to tacitly or overtly identify with one’s own kind.

It’s possible that White libs, left to themselves, will concoct some rhetorical sophistry for keeping out the Diversity that doesn’t overload their egos, in essence creating a de facto White lib ethnocentrism, but I have a hard time envisioning a scenario in which the modren White shitlib can casually betray her ego without having an existential crisis. If FreeWhites aren’t around, maybe GoonWhites can easily and expediently dispose of every race equalism and White privilege belief they claim to cherish, just as they now easily and hypocritically contradict themselves to “score” political points against their FreeWhite enemies.

Nevertheless, this is all moot speculation because White libs would prevent any peaceful separation solution to the eternal intra-White animosity that is burning hotter now than it has since the days before Civil War I. White libs don’t want White cons to go their own way; they want to lord it over White cons, to force them to submit to White lib rule, and to rub their faces in their humiliation and despair. The totalizing authoritarian streak is a mile wide and ten miles deep in GoonWhites. For White libs to allow White cons their own nation would be, in the White lib mind, tantamount to Nazis getting their lebensraüm.

White libs don’t want to run away to build their own nation and write their own left-liberal constitution; what White libs want is to build their own nation and write their own left-liberal constitution RIGHT WHERE WHITE CONS LIVE, BECAUSE FORCING WHITE CON SUBMISSION IS HALF THE FUN.

This is why I predict that if there is a blood-drenched Civil War II, it will be the fault of White libs who won’t tolerate White cons attempting a peaceful separation from them. And, unlike Civil War I when White libs had a facsimile of moral high ground to prevent secession, this time around all the moral justification will be with the FreeWhites who just want to get out from under the yoke of White lib tyranny.

Some commenters #racist amren.com

Re: Democrats Don’t Want to Nominate a Candidate Who Looks like Bernie or Joe

(guest)

"Blacks prefer black candidates; Hispanics prefer Hispanic candidates; whites prefer non-white candidates."

No wonder White democrats are such miserable people. They adhere to a political cult where they must hate themselves and worship their non-white enemies.

(THE WAY)

Whites who prefer non-White candidates have a sickness in their soul and in their minds. Very, very sick people. Self-preservation is the primary instinct because if one does not want to preserve oneself or one's own kind, one is by definition, insane or brainwashed or both.

A hardline black Republican is more aligned with your interests than a white liberal Democrat

A White liberal can still produce White children. A hardline black Republican can never produce white children. I think in terms of long range good for Whites, not in terms of a few years.

Genocide of Wolves by mixing with dogs. Europeans concerned about this but not about Whites being genocided by mixing with non-Whites. C'mon White humans get your priorities straight and learn from nature.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/05/190523104940.htm

(Widenose Privilege)

The spring of white hope seems endless. It's being wasted on trying to force a square peg into a round hole.

Show of hands of those of you that think the great technological advancements of the future will be thought of and spearheaded by 'people of color'.

Ha. I'm not holding my breath either. We are here for them. They are here for themselves.

(SAVE WHITE SETTLER U.S.A.)

It's the Latinos in California government that are ruining California.
Latinos ONLY care about Latinos. Once Latinos are in charge, your city/state will be RUINED
Now that Latinos are in charge of California, ESPECIALLY the police force, they cover up crimes of Latinos.
Have you ever noticed that not many Latino crimes are reported?? Latinos cover up this information.

(Nevada Smith)

"Blacks prefer black candidates; Hispanics prefer Hispanic candidates...." That fact seems to be lost on Democrat. open borders advocates. Hispanics are not liberal, not conservative, not Democrat, not Republican, not Asian, not black, not white, but Hispanic. Hispanic interests are not the same as anyone else. The conflict between Little Nancy and AOC should be a wakeup call to Democrats where their party is heading. I'll bet after the 2020 election, Little Nancy will find she will be dealing with people that make AOC look like a moderate.

(Missy)

...Black and Latino Dems—who, together, are about a third of the primary electorate—prefer candidates of their own race by a substantial margin...

Hey look, reality is staring you in the face. Diversity doesn't work because normal people prefer their own race. Not any fancy mechanism here, just simply part of animal behavior, in-group selection is necessary for survival.

(Question Diversity)

Black and Latino Dems—who, together, are about a third of the primary electorate—prefer candidates of their own race

As of right now, black voters who intend to vote in Democrat primaries are heavily behind Joe Biden. Mainly because he's perceived as "the big man" and "it's his turn."

(Rich at Large)

The AR caption says it all: blacks are for blacks, browns are for browns, yellows are for yellows, reds are for reds, and liberal whites are for all of the above but not for whites. Somewhere in the mix is the tiny Jewish population that can move between being perceived as white and not.

Robert Hampton #racist #psycho amren.com

‘Conservatives’ Make Fools of Themselves over Arbery Shooting

We don’t need a trial. The two white men who shot Ahmaud Arbery are murderers. Just ask some of America’s leading conservative pundits.
We don’t know all the facts — and as Jared Taylor has pointed out, some are exculpatory — but that doesn’t stop Democrats and mainstream media from assuring us that George and Travis McMichaels are guilty. Many “conservatives” agree.

Daily Wire writer Matt Walsh tweeted this on Wednesday: “The man was going for a jog and three white guys chased him down and shot him dead. The murderers still haven’t been arrested. Outrageous. This is clearcut first degree murder and the killers should all get lethal injections.”
He later confessed it was a stupid tweet, but Mr. Walsh loves to pound his chest about bad white people. After the El Paso shooting, he said white nationalists are complicit in terrorism. His boss Ben Shapiro said the white shooters deserve murder charges and tweeted out three articles that said the same thing. All three were from “conservatives.”

One was from Never Trumper David French. He said the white men’s actions were like a lynching:

It’s also worth remembering that the long and evil history of American lynchings features countless examples of young black men hunted and killed by white gangs who claimed their victims had committed crimes. While we don’t yet know the full details about the McMichaels’ motives, their actions speak loudly enough. When white men grab guns and mount up to pursue and seize an unarmed black man in the street, they stand in the shoes of lynch mobs past.

The other articles Mr. Shapiro shared were similar. National Review writer David Harasanyi said it was murder, and Arbery was right to attack the McMichaels. HotAir pundit Allahpundit said the state must punish the McMichaels to send a message against “vigilantism.”

New York Post opinion editor Sohrab Ahmari said the shooting “harks back to some of America’s oldest and ugliest racial traditions.” He added that “the newly released footage resembles a scene from the 19th century, when sadly, it’s 2020: a pair of white men on a white pickup truck harassing a black jogger on a deserted Georgia road.”

American Conservative senior editor Rod Dreher wrote a post called, “Ahmaud Arbery, Just A Runner.” “Arbery was unarmed,” he said. “Of course. The white men claim they were trying to make a citizen’s arrest of a burglary suspect. Arbery himself was no suspect — but he was black.” Mr. Dreher added that he heard “a middle-class, Christian African-American woman” was afraid to move her family to a white community in the South:

They have been warned by sympathetic sources not to do it, because the white people who live in that community do not want blacks living there, and will enforce that violently. The friend looks at white men protesting with guns because they want to get a haircut during Covidtide, and thinks about how her family might not be able to move into a certain neighborhood because her husband and older sons might have to worry about being shot by angry white men.

This is insane, and unjust. But this is life for a lot of black people in America. We should not forget that.

This is foolishness. If a white community kept out blacks through violence, it would be the biggest story in the country, if not the world. If such a place did exist, Mr. Dreher should compare its crime figures to those of a nearby black community. He would probably find that the white community was much safer.

National Review writer Michael Brendan Dougherty tweeted: “Yeah my stomach was turning all afternoon yesterday after watching this.”

Rand Paul’s chief strategist Doug Stafford demanded his “fellow white Americans” watch this “lynching.” He says not enough whites are “demanding justice.” Conservatives should know better than to rush to judgment, let alone “demand” it. Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown should have taught them to wait for the facts. Why aren’t they waiting? Because there’s practically nothing “conservatives” crave more than expiation from the charge of “racism.” They jump at the first chance to join the lynch mob.

That’s why conservatives wax righteous over cases like this but are silent when blacks kill whites. Will these virtue queens demand justice for the white mail carrier killed by a black in Indianapolis?

In Brunswick, Georgia, where Ahmaud Arbery was shot, a black murdered a 13-month-old white baby in his stroller in 2013. Will any of these people even mention this case? No chance. Conservatives thrive on praise from liberals, and they don’t get it for telling the truth.

PDK #racist stuffblackpeopledontlike.blogspot.com

As I perused the news online this morning I notice Kim Kardashian is pregnant and Kanye is the father.

Normally I could care less about Kim Kardashian, however being a white woman and sharing the eggs she was entrusted with from the white gene pool with black sperm from the black gene pool is the type of transgression or abrogation of nature liberal enforced ideology is making materialize.

This is so wrong.

I wonder if our white girls and white women knew the truth of the black gene pool`s reality, that the black, more r selective GP produces a physically smaller, lower IQ cerebrum, if they would still care to share their genes with black genes. But the liberal enforced ideology will not let our females see this truth; in fact they attempt to persuade our females to share their entrusted eggs with black sperm. So vile is the ability of a liberal, and especially of liberal leadership, itself sick with the desire for the power to parent all as a God, that not only are our white girls and women not allowed to see this truth, they are instead deluded by commercials and other things Hollywood to believe the exact opposite, that black males are superior to white males.

It is horrible enough that we whites surrender our hard earned and created culture to blacks because of liberal ideology. It is far more horrible that we whites allow our white gene pool to be transmogrified and polluted by black genes, yet both these conditions are being enforced upon us by liberal ideology.

Time to consider a gathering together of us non-liberal whites, and declaring independence from liberals and blacks. Time to consider secession. Thank you.

The Wolf #racist answers.yahoo.com

Even a better question, why are racist American blacks always whining? America has been the best country on earth for black folks. It was here that they were introduced to Christian salvation, and reached the greatest levels of freedom and prosperity blacks have ever known. Blacks should get down on their knees and thank God they is are Americans, and stop whining so much.

Second, No people anywhere has done more to lift up blacks than white Americans. Untold trillions have been spent since the '60s on welfare, food stamps, rent supplements, section 8 housing, Pell grants, student loans, legal services, Medicaid, Earned Income Tax Credits and poverty programs designed to bring the African-American community into the mainstream.

Governments, businesses and colleges have engaged in discrimination against white folks -- with affirmative action, contract set-asides and quotas -- to advance black applicants over white applicants.

Churches, foundations, civic groups, schools and individuals all over America have donated their time and money to support soup kitchens, adult education, day care, retirement and nursing homes for blacks.

We hear the grievances. Where the hell is the gratitude?

Neo-liberals talk about new 'ladders of opportunity' for blacks. Let him go to Altoona, and Johnstown, and ask the white kids in Catholic schools how many were visited lately by Ivy League recruiters handing out scholarships for "deserving' white kids"...?

Is white America really responsible for the fact that the crime and incarceration rates for blacks are seven times those of white America? Is it really white America's fault that illegitimacy in the black community has hit 70 percent and the black dropout rate from high schools in some cities has reached 50 percent?


Is that the fault of white America or, first and foremost, a failure of the black community itself?

As for racism, its ugliest manifestation is in interracial crime, and especially interracial crimes of violence. Is this idiot 0bama aware that while white criminals choose black victims 3 percent of the time, black criminals choose white victims 45 percent of the time?

These neo-liberals are stupid to be aware that black-on-white rapes are 100 times more common than the reverse, that black-on-white robberies were 139 times as common in the first three years of this decade as the reverse?

We have all heard ad nauseam from the Rev. Al about Tawana Brawley, the Duke rape case and Jena. And all turned out to be hoaxes. But about the epidemic of black assaults on whites that are real, we hear nothing.

Sorry, blacks, some of us have heard it all before, about 40 years and 40 trillion tax dollars ago.

CTON #racist amren.com

RE: Video: ANC and Mainstream Media Are South Africa’s Problems, Not Whites – Unathi Kwaza

The Candace Owens of South Africa. She has no sway except to convince gullible Whites that the there is a pot of gold at the end of the Rainbow Nation, when actually it's a big soup pot waiting to boil your bones.

This is what I've noticed about 'conservative' blacks. They say and do things that their conservative white base is terrified to say or do and get paid well for doing that while the liberal blacks make money agitating against whites. These gullible conservative whites think these 'conservative' blacks are on their side. They are so naive.

It's like that with whites. Liberal whites are not 'down' with helping out blacks or nonwhites. They say that to save face as many liberal whites don't live anywhere near black and nonwhite areas. In the end, your race trumps your politics.

Speaking of Candace Owens, didn't she support affirmative action and have a doxxing website? Could be wrong, but that's what I've heard.

j #conspiracy answers.yahoo.com

As far as violent and hateful language and calls for White genocide, there is a long list of belligerent quotations by leftists in the media, politics, and academia. The following is a small sample:

Leonard Jeffries, chairman of African-American studies at the City College of New York, said he wanted to leave his children in a “world in which there aren’t any White people.” Jewish Harvard professor and editor of Race Traitor magazine Noel Ignatiev trumpeted, “The goal of abolishing the White race is on its face so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed White supremacists. … Keep bashing the dead White males, and the live ones, and the females, too, until the social construct known as the White race is destroyed. Not deconstructed, but destroyed.” Mario Obledo, founder of the Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF), remarked on radio station KIEV, “California is going to be a Hispanic state and anyone who doesn’t like it should leave. If they don’t like Mexicans, they ought to go back to Europe.” Jewish intellectual and leftist activist Susan Sontag snarled, “The White race is the cancer of history.”

Professor Jose Gutierrez of the University of Texas gleefully boasted, “We have an aging White America. They are dying. They are [expletive] in their pants with fear! I love it!” Malcolm X described a plane crash in 1962 as follows: “The death of over 120 White people is a very beautiful thing.” Eldridge Cleaver, former Black Panther leader, explained why he raped White women: “Rape was an insurrectionary act. It delighted me that I was defying and trampling upon the White man’s law, upon his system of values, and that I was defiling his women.”

Leftists have conducted an incessant and strident media, political, and educational campaign with the message that White Americans are irredeemably evil. The ideology of unique White evil has motivated many Blacks to murder, rape, rob, and assault Whites, or at the very least has lessened inhibitions toward doing so. The amount of Black-on-White violent crime overshadows White-on-Black violent crime by such an egregious magnitude that it should enrage any reasonable person. Black men rape White women approximately twenty to thirty thousand times every single year in America. The annual count of White men raping Black women rarely breaks into the double digits.

Instead of pointing out the horrendous amount of Black-on-White violent crime, the left purposefully covers it up by not reporting it in the mainstream media!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The silence is deafening, especially for victims and their families. Even worse, the left plays up any examples of White-on-Black violence to warp the public’s perception of reality. Instead of taking steps to reduce or call attention to Black-on-White rape, robbery, assault, and murder, the left clamors for “Hate Crime” laws which only apply to White perpetrators. Former head of the US Commission on Civil Rights, Mary Frances Berry, explained that “Civil rights laws were not passed to protect the rights of White men and do not apply to them.”

Buster Himen #fundie erasingus.com

Know Your Enemy: The 5 Types of White Liberal Men

There are a few types of liberal White males that exist and today we're going to cover five of them. They are creepy, they are emotional, they are illogical and they all play an important role in erasing us.

The most integral part of the struggle for White survival is for you to understand who your enemy is and then study them; know them like the back side of your hand. Understand the way they think to make yourself a more formidable debater. Understand how to exploit the loopholes, double-standards, and fallacy in their emotional pleas to erase the White race from planet earth.

Now here we are, the five types of White liberal men.

1. The Blue Pill Beta Male.

These are the kinds of men who you find identifying as feminists because they think it'll get them laid. Little do they know women really aspire to be with an Alpha male. Perhaps that is why the majority of feminists have rape fantasies to the point they invent terms like "rape culture." Nonetheless, these men typically surround themselves with social justice warrior White females with multicolored hair, nose piercings and oversized eyeglasses and kowtow to their social outrage causes.

2. The White Husband Who Gets Off Watching His Wife Bang Black Guys.

These types of White liberals are particularly gross. The problem they have is more or less rooted in a serious psychological disease that stems from an addiction to hardcore pornography. They need to find something more and more taboo and the only thing they can eventually achieve satisfaction on is by abusing themselves by handing their wives, and sometimes daughters, off to Black men. They also have an inherent inferiority complex. They buy into the Jewish poison that White men are inferior sexual providers to their women as propagated in the Jewish media commercials, television shows, movies and music. A part of this, particularly among the younger generation of White communists is as some sort of penance for the since of their "racist ancestors." Seriously, there is a whole corner of the internet dedicated to this filth. They aren't open about their hatred for White people but you can bet they were amongst the first to line up to vote for Barack Obama, twice.

3. The Academic White Communist.

Under any other circumstances like not having wealthy parents, they would have become a gutter rat ANTIFA activist. But their parents who have worked hard their entire lives to accumulate a savings account and send their kids to university end up with a child who get indoctrinated in "gender studies" and "white privilege" sociology classes. They buy the malarky of their Jewish communist professors who are burnouts from the 1960s hippie movement. Bring it all down, man. They use words and phrases like "structural racism" and "white privilege" and express particular concern about "rape culture." He may even go so far as to post pictures to his Tumblr and Twitter accounts of himself holding up sharpie markered signs saying "this is what a feminist looks like" or notes about his "White skin privilege." What these people do is regurgitate the kind of far-left nonsense that their professors teach them. They live so well, their life is so great, they have so many opportunities that they need to find something wrong with the world and adhere to neo-Marxist nonsense.

4. The Union Worker.

I'm having a hard time with this one simply because it is tough to consider drywall hangers, carpenters, painters, plumbers and other craftsmen as "liberal" by the 2015 standard. Your average unionized contractor more than likely does not want his daughter marrying Tyrone and certainly does not buy into the "White Privilege" bullshit but for all intents and purposes he is as dangerous to the future of the White race as number's 1-3 on our list and I'll tell you why. The union worker primarily votes Democrat and by default liberal for purely economic reasons. Whether you realize it or not, the "union thug" who votes blue to save his pension and platinum health benefits and 6 weeks of vacation is almost as harmful to White society as the ghetto waste in the Section 8 housing development who is eating McDonalds, smoking Newports and drinking Miller High Life on your dime. Would you believe these two people are voting alongside these people? The sheer greed of many White males to vote such a way to preserve their own arbitrary wealth has been and continues to be devastating and will ultimately be what gets Hilary Clinton elected in 2016. Sure, voting Republican would send his son to fight Israel's wars but holy cow, you can thank this type of White liberal for Barack Obama.

5. The One Who Is Starting to Get It.

There comes a time when every man has to take a long, hard look in the mirror and answer to himself. There is undoubtedly a contingent of well-intentioned White male liberals who realize that no matter how much Social Justice Warrioring around they do they will still be considered the ultimate scum of society. All of the men on this list, perhaps with the exception of number two who is who he is because of childhood abuse and perverted pornography addiction, will in due time realize that they just aren't welcomed and certainly aren't needed anymore. The feminists truly hate men so they no longer need the pity points since enough of the idiots in America believe in farces like "rape culture" and "gender inequality." The campus chapter of the Black Panthers and Muslim Brotherhood will capitalize on the emotionality of White women and no longer need White men to kiss their ass. The mass expanding non-White population in America will be enough to get Democrats elected and the pensions of union workers will be unfunded liabilities and the first thing to go when the shit hits the fan.

You can bet your bottom dollar that a ton of White liberal males of all ages in all corners of the United States are starting to take long and hard look at the lunacy of the world around them. They're evaluating all of the time they have wasted being a Social Justice Warrior and eventually take that step toward being a conservative with a brain instead of a conservative with no heart.

Gene Ray (Time Cube Guy) #racist timecube.com

WARNING TO EDUCATED STUPID, Black
Skin equates imprisonment, white race had
nothing to do making negros black. Even a worst imprisonment exists when the whites are under
Dark rule, who seek revenge for false slavory.
Hell, I am as much an economic slave as any
black.Not one black in America wears a shackle
that prevents them from returning to their
African culture. White people are not obligated
to nurture the black race - when actually dark
and light should exist on opposite corners of
Earth as depicted by midday and midnight.
The white race is actually stupid to give
welfare and integrate with the Black Race,
who in time will slaughter them. The white
race has done more to support the Black
Race around the World than even the
Black Race itself. In America, Blacks
have welfare, in Africa they have AIDS.
Play the colors dealt, some have to the
cops and the others the robbers, next
life it will be reversed. Hell could be the
living in Black skin, but for whites living
under Black rule could be a harsher hell.

I know for a fact that 4 simultaneous 24
hour Days exist within a single rotation
of Earth. Midday is a light race Day.
Sundown is an Asian race Day. Midnight
is a Black Race Day and Sunup is an Indian
Race Day. Erroneous 1 Day 1 God crap
has corrupted human Cubic intelligence.
Genesis 1:5 "first Day"is an evil Lie -
contradicting the whole damn bible sh-it.
Bible and stupid academic ONEness
ignores and obstructs Cubic Creation
Intelligence. Black people should create
a "White Race Appreciation Day"for
all they have sacrificed to help the Black.
Compare the American Black economics
to the African Black environment where
Whites can't own land or vote.

Warning to Obama, I believe that your
black/white equality posture will lead
your people to a racial war - destroying
both races and America. Another
warning you have no inkling about
and never taught. The Sun has ruled
over the Light on Earth for eons and
might just fight back with another
"Big Bang Catastrope"if Dark rules
over the light from the highest office
on Earth. You are giving hope to
your people that is impossible for them
to achieve and maintain. If you incite
your people to revolt and the signs are
already there, whites around the World
will slaughter their blacks, and the rest
will be returned to African Hell. After
you fight the whites, the Blacks will
have the masses of China upon them.
Resign now Obama, avoid the carnage
you encourage. Note the Bald Eagle
with its white head brain with its
powerful Black body No Dark shall rule
over the light on Earth. Resign now
before you incite hell on Earth for both
Dark and Light races. Don't forget
your dark rule over light on Earth will
most likely incite the Sun to fight back.

Fascovereign Weltanschauung #racist fascovereign.blogspot.co.uk

This week there was a black woman in England who has actually taken her boss to court because he used the word ‘golliwog’ to describe a golliwog. The conversation was about the removal of the golliwog icon from Robertson’s jam. She was offended at the accurate use of an English noun, and is now claiming compensation for damages. This is insane, from a white man’s point of view. I can understand why cursing and swearing can be seen as offensive, but using accurate terminology for a subject should be commended, not legislated against. A while back a similar occurrence happened to me. I was in a chat-room and I referred to an African cannibal that was killing another cannibal as a ‘black savage’. I was castigated for imposing my standards on another race and putting Blacks down. Quite what the politically correct term is for an African cannibal in the process of butchering another I do not know. The social engineers motivation behind all this is to try and prevent people from being able to put their thoughts into words, in the hope that those thoughts will no longer exist. This will not stop African cannibals from existing though, it will just prevent anyone from being able to accurately describe what they see.

The golliwog was a much loved children’s toy and a part of the childhood of every one over 40 years old. It was never meant to be offensive, and actually gave children a false view of black people as harmless. As a representation of a black person they do tend to accentuate their more positive attributes, at least the golliwog is always smiling. Quite why Blacks don’t like them makes no sense unless they don’t like what they look like themselves, and the only way that could happen is if they were comparing themselves to white people. I can understand black people not liking their appearance when they compare themselves to Whites.

Black people never had a problem with their looks until they were told that they were the same species as Whites. Beauty products for Blacks to try to make themselves look White are a massive industry. You rarely ever see natural black hair anymore, they all either shave it off if they are male, or wear wigs and use straighteners if they are female. They try to whiten their skin with lotions and bleaches thinking that by doing this they will look more beautiful. By telling Blacks that they are the same species as Whites we have taught them to hate their own appearance.
By telling them they are as capable as Whites if they only just applied themselves, we have made them feel like failures when they cannot achieve the same. It is no surprise that they drop out of school and are happy to be on the dole and just breed. That is what is in their nature. They are a completely different species to the white man and the lie that they are the same as us has required much falsification of science and indoctrination in the media.

If they had been taught they were the king of the animals and to compare themselves to other apes, they would have been extremely proud of their features and feel blessed at how close they looked to man. They would be pleased with the gifts that they had been given and grateful to man for looking after them, the same as pets are grateful for being fed and looked after.

In Africa they roam in herds eating whatever they come across that they can catch or pull up. They are incapable of planting a seed on their own accord, and waiting for it to grow, in the same way that other animals are unable to do this. They breed by just taking whatever female they feel like when the urge takes them. The females just expect this to happen when they are around the males, and they have the same word for rape as they do for consensual sex. The only reason Africa is the rape capital of the world is because animals are included in the statistics.

If you compare their housing to what other animals live in there is much similarity with the beaver and their bodies have more in common with the great apes, than they do with Caucasian man. Sometimes their nose bones are united into one and they have membranes that cover the lower part of their eyes just like gorillas. Their offspring are able to hold their heads up on their own within 6 hours of birth. They have a high fertility rate to compensate for the large amount of mortality in their young, where the pups are just left to feed for themselves once they have finished weaning.
Wherever you find a herd of negroes you will find rubbish, the same as wherever you find other animals you will find the remains of what they have eaten. There really is very little to the essential negro that bears any resemblance to a Caucasian. It is only because they have been taught that they are something different to what they really are, that they are unhappy with their lot. Is the bear unhappy to be a bear? Would he be offended to be called an affectionate name? Would he be offended at a toy bear that accentuated his smile?

The worst thing that ever happened to the black man was to be told that he was the same species as the White. It has been equally damaging to the white man, who has seen the way the Black behaves and thought that it was fine for him to do the same. Marriage has never existed in Africa in the way that it does in Europe and I doubt that they even know what love is. Like most animals, I am sure they can become fond of certain people, and like all animals a bond develops between mother and young, but once the young are grown, the bond disappears. Even Barry Obama has nothing to do with the rest of his family. They have no relevance to him, the same as animals from the same litter hardly seem to recognise each other and may even kill each other, when they meet up as adults. 70% of Black children are brought up in single parent families, 20% are born to teenagers and this behaviour has now also been adopted by Whites.

The lie of equality has meant that the white man’s standards have now dropped to the level of the Blacks, and all his resources are devoted to achieving the impossible, making the Black into a man. If God had intended him to be a man he would have made him one. I think it is quite obvious that the Black was created to need the white man to feed and house him and in return he was given the ability to be trained in rudimentary skills, so that the white man could make use of him. He was given a sloping head so that he could carry things on it. He was given hands instead of paws so that he could pick the fruit that the white man planted and operate the mechanics that the white man invented. He was given the ability to understand the white man’s orders and to act upon them. In return, the white man fed, housed and nursed him, the same as he does with all his domesticated animals.
The White man became so enamoured with his useful pet that he made children’s toys of him that accentuated his features, particularly the large mouths that have many more teeth than white people. At least the golliwog is smiling. I do not see many Blacks smiling now that they have been taught they are the same as us. I just see angry Blacks resentful at what they think we have stolen from them, to make them the way that they are.

How anyone can be offended at a doll that represents them being used by another species, with a harmless name like golliwog I just do not know. Do Blacks have white dolls in Africa called a golly gosh? Would anyone White be offended if they did? Having a black dolly in a country that had no Blacks living in it, shows that the people living there had a great sympathy for other creatures. It showed that they were not self centred and felt compassion for the other races. It showed that they were not prejudiced against other peoples but felt affection for them. If this were not true, then the golly would never have sold. It didn’t just sell, but was so popular it was used as a symbol to sell other products.

It is only since being deceived into thinking that they are the same species as us that such nonsense as pretending to be offended at Golliwogs could happen. They realised they would be rewarded if they rejected the word ‘nigger’ and are now looking for other words that they can reject for approval. It is obvious that they do not actually understand context, as the golliwog case shows. They just know that they will gain approval if they reject the word when they hear it.
They try to imitate the white man and just say what they think the white man wants to hear. They cannot learn in the way that the white man does, although they are good imitators, all they can really do is be trained. They have been trained to react to certain words and think they will gain approval by doing so. The more intelligent ones make the perfect puppets because of this, they will say whatever they are taught to say without adding an opinion of their own, because they are unable to actually form one of their own.

Some of them reject the training entirely, and go back to acting entirely on impulse. These are the ones who commit the most horrific crimes and then deny responsibility for doing them. They are right, they are not responsible for the things they do, in the same way that a dog is not responsible for the things it does. A sheepdog can be trained, but it will never be able to be left on its own to herd the sheep. The black man can be trained, but he can never be left on his own to run anything, as we see in South Africa, Haiti, Zimbabwe, Detroit, Liberia, Nigeria etc.

This case in particular serves to demonstrate how different Whites are to Blacks. It shows that they are incapable of understanding context, and proves that they are just looking to be rewarded, like any other pet. The woman obviously does not understand that by complaining about the accurate use of the word she is just making herself look stupid, petty and money grabbing. All she is capable of understanding is that it is a bad word. It also shows how double standards are being applied here. It is only the white man that can be prosecuted for using words from his own language, in his own country. It doesn’t matter how many words they ban, it will never change the black man from being what he is. Whether we can describe him or not, he will always be black. He will always be different to the white man and the only way the two could ever be equalised, is if the white man became a beast too.

Susan #racist amren.com

Blacks have been taught/brainwashed by the government to hate whites, to blame us for everything that's innately wrong with the black race. Blacks and idiot-white-liberals believe that white oppression, racism, & privilege cause blacks to be unsuccessful in our white society.

Apparently, we whites have planned our civilizations to oppress blacks. Low IQ is the root of all black dysfunction and it's the reason they're so easily brainwashed. They haven't always hated whites. They've been conditioned to do so for 60 years.

Ayo Kimathi #racist waronthehorizon.com

Trayvon Martin & white smallhat Terrorism

In recent War Rooms, WOH has been very clear about the fact that whites are waging a full-scale war against Black people on the Afrikan continent . . . However, this reality in no way takes away from the war that’s raging against Black people here in amerikkka. In fact, white amerikkkans of all different ilks are binding together to commit genocide against our people in this country. And many people have no idea how the white terrorism leading to the murder of Trayvon Martin is but a microcosm of what whites are doing to Black people throughout this country and abroad.

*Please pay close attention to the fact that smallhats (white so-called jews) are disproportionately involved in the process of white terrorism against Black people in amerikkka. The war is a white-against Black war; but the smallhats clearly outdo the average white anglo-saxons in their zeal to carry out white-on-Black terrorism in amerikkka.****

To put this terrorism in perspective, let’s examine the following incidents of white-on-Black terrorism in amerikkka over the past few decades[...]

This is a very short and abbreviated list of white terrorist attacks and/or murders that have occurred over the past 20 years. It probably represents less than 1% of the white terrorist assaults and murders that actually took place in this country since 1990. However, it does provide Black people in amerikkka with a context in which to understand the Trayvon Martin execution-style murder committed by the smallhat george zimmerman. whites in general and smallhats in specific have been on a door-to-door campaign of Black extinction in this country. And because Black men do not kill the perpetrators of crimes against our Race, whites feel justified in killing our people. Moreover, our Black male acceptance of white-on-Black murder is taken as a kill-at-will card for whites in this country.

In this light, zimmerman saw an easy opportunity to kill a defenseless Black boy who he knew would have no Black men to avenge his murder. He took this opportunity and murdered our young Brother in cold blood. Because he is a smallhat and lives in Florida e most smallhat-friendly state next to jew york) is unlikely to face any real time. His only real just punishment would have to come at the hands of Black men in amerikkka.

The bigger picture is that we are in an emerging police state that will quickly lead to the physical enslavement and/or genocide of Black people in amerikkka. Since the whites who rule this country are looking for an excuse to physically invade Black communities around this country anyway, they will use the Trayvon Martin murder scenario, and others in the days to come, to fan the flames of Black racial dissatisfaction in this country. After we have our standard, militant, 3-day insurrektion, whites plan to seize Afrikan communities and begin the process of physically re-enslaving and/or executing Black people. This process is already starting subtly in some areas of this country. But within (2) years, it will become blatantly obvious to everyone as the overt murders of Black people in broad daylight by law enforcement officials increases exponentially.

Michael Williams #racist #wingnut amren.com

A Young White Man’s Struggle with Identity

This is part of our continuing series of accounts by readers of how they shed the illusions of liberalism and became race realists.

I am a white man in his mid-twenties who grew up in a middle-class home. My mom was a liberal public school teacher and was passionate about helping “oppressed” immigrants and minorities. She taught at inner-city schools and worked as a missionary in Haiti and Mexico. Looking back, I realize I was deeply influenced by her — especially since I had no real father figure. I was taught to not see color, and that in general, the reason why minorities and immigrants struggle in America was because of racist whites.

I was a rebellious teenager, and made plenty of trouble for myself throughout high school. Eventually, my bad behavior made my mom decide to pull me out of my majority white school and enroll me in the almost exclusively black school she taught at. She thought the black kids would “straighten me out” and “show me what it’s really like to have it bad” — but that isn’t what happened. Instead, I ended up coming to admire the black “gangster/thug life” and started using drugs and causing as much trouble as ever.

The next year she sent me back to the majority white school I had been pulled out of, but the trouble didn’t stop. I began using more and more drugs, and became addicted to Oxycontin. After that it was a downward spiral. I was willing to do anything to get the drug, and I started hanging around bad characters. By the end of high school, I was selling drugs and robbing people in order to fund my addiction.

Not long after I graduated, my parents kicked me out and I started “couch-surfing,” while still selling and using drugs. This ended with me going to a treatment center for a year and a half — but once I left, I quickly picked up my bad habits once again. I started selling crack and other drugs in a black ghetto, and my life was centered around getting high. But I soon found that I was not welcome there, and even hated. Not because I was dealing drugs, but just because I was white and operating in black “turf.” That period of my life was marked by many fights, a lot of close calls, and a revolving door of jail cells, treatment centers, and homelessness.

In the midst of all this chaos, I fathered a child with a black girl. Though nobody in my white family was bothered by this, some of my black “friends” and relatives of the mother openly voiced their disapproval of interracial relationships. Regardless, becoming a father motivated me to grow up, become a man, and change so I could be a good dad to my daughter. I sobered up and started working any job I could get.

My change in lifestyle made me start to think about race. As I was working hard, my “homies” still came around, but they never wanted to do anything but get high and get into trouble. A lot of my “friends,” most of them black, drifted away from me because I was doing something positive with my life instead of destroying it with drugs and crime. That was too “lame” for them. One of my closest black friends began constantly lamenting the fact that I was changing and wasn’t “the good old guy who just wanted to kick back and get high” anymore. But he still hung around, so I would say things to him like, “Hey I know we both have criminal records and drug problems, but if I can get sober and work to have a decent life, so can you.” I tried to be a positive influence, but he always had excuses.

One day, I told him, “I’ll help you put your resume together and I’ll take you to go apply to some jobs.” He said he would do it, but when I picked him up, he just wanted to get high and went on a long speech about oppression saying, “You don’t know how hard it is for a black man in America, it might be easy for you to just go and get a job, but not for me.” I asked him, “What makes you assume that it was easy for me? Just because I’m white?! And second, how are you going to cry victim when you haven’t even honestly tried to work hard or change? I’m offering to help you get a resume together, but you want to get high instead? No one is holding you back but yourself.” We argued and then went our separate ways.
Many blacks would rather live the “thug life” than work hard to make an honest living. Yet they make excuses, blame society, the police, and the white man for all their problems. Some blacks are hell bent on destroying themselves and everyone around them because they feel like victims, and they will never take any personal responsibility. I came to realize that the only thing I had ever had in common with blacks like that was a victim mentality and the desire to get high. Once I stopped being a victim and sobered up, none of them wanted anything to do with me anymore. Now that I was doing positive things with my life, they weren’t even happy for me, just envious.

I moved on and kept to myself in the years that followed. And after a few years of hard work and self-improvement, I got back together with the mother of my child and we moved in together. I was proud that I didn’t make excuses for myself, and did the hard work I needed to do to get my family back together, and made myself into the man and father they needed me to be. I don’t regret any of this. I did not want my child to grow up without a father, like I did. Fatherlessness is a huge issue in America today, leading to all kinds of dysfunction.

With my life in order, I turned my focus to education and the pursuit of truth. I dove into topics such as psychology, history, economics, politics, and ultimately — race. The more I learned, the more unconvinced I was by the “blue-pill” liberal worldview I grew up believing. When I discovered race realism, I was impressed by how many facts and statistics lined up with my own experiences living as a criminal in “the hood.” From there, I discovered the alarming realities of the “great replacement,” liberal censorship, and the violence committed by antifa and Black Lives Matter. The more I dove into the facts, the more I saw that Ben Shapiro, Jordan B. Peterson, Charles Murray, and Jared Taylor were telling the truth. Simultaneously, I realized how insidious the Left was in trying to smear, censor, shame, and shut down these thinkers. It was at this time that Donald Trump was elected, and I began seeing the protests, riots, rage, and unrest coming from the left. A political line in the sand was being drawn, and the Left was no longer open to dialogue: they were only interested in taking power by force.

White liberals claim to be on the side of minorities and other “oppressed” groups, but they know nothing about them. As a white man who lived the thug life in the hood for over eight years, I know that they hate the white liberals’ pandering, and when white boys imitate them. Most of them hate the idea of assimilating into white America: they want their own jurisdictions, culture, and rules — and they hate when whites intrude, peacefully or otherwise. Believers in the “melting pot” theory have never lived in a black community, but they like to imagine that they are great “warriors” and activists for justice and equality.

As a white man, and as a father to a black and white child, I felt that fully understanding racial issues was an absolute must. My daughter’s mother and I had many conversations about these matters, and — fortunately — she agreed with almost everything I was discovering about race. She saw the destructive tendencies of blacks firsthand. When she worked hard at her job or studied hard in school, other blacks were jealous and treated her with contempt for “acting white.” She has never been able to understand why most blacks have such a big chip on their shoulders, hate whites, and maintain a victim mentality when they never experienced slavery or Jim Crow themselves.

She doesn’t make excuses for her own shortcomings and has never cared that other blacks claim she isn’t “really black” or hated her for her success or for having a child with a white man. Because of this, our family remains strong and united. Some may accuse her of hating her own race, but the truth is simply that she refuses to buy into the lies and propaganda that blacks must fight against whites in order to succeed. She loves her own people, family, and race. She also appreciates and respects white culture and realizes that whites built this country and made it prosperous. She loves America, and doesn’t want it to change, so she supports the national identity of America as a white nation, and has no desire to see it taken over by blacks, immigrants, or “social justice warriors.” I believe more and more blacks are waking up and coming to support America instead of hating it.

I may have a mixed child, but I am a full supporter of the US, the white race, our culture, and our honor. I will die before I see our great country defiled and overtaken by leftists and foreigners who hate our culture and want to replace it with theirs. My grandfathers both died to defend this land, and it is my duty to do the same if the time comes — and every day it feels more and more like that day will come during my lifetime. The increasing amounts of censorship, indoctrination, government largesse, and white ethnomasochism that we see can make the future look bleak. But there is hope in the fact that if people wake up to the truth now — and stop being afraid to speak their minds — we can turn things around and preserve this great country — maybe even make it greater.

Herbert Dyer, Jr. #moonbat #psycho #racist medium.com

Christian Cooper, the 57-year-old black birdwatcher who filmed white female dog walker Amy Cooper as she tried to sic, not her dog, but the NYPD on him for daring to challenge her refusal to leash the dog — that Christian Cooper has now refused to press charges against her for, among other things, making a false police report.

[...]

Commentary
Black ‘Forgiveness’ — White Cooper versus Black Cooper
The test is a simple one, and the answer is always the same:
If the “situation” were reversed — that is, if Christian Cooper had been white and Amy Cooper black, would a white Cooper forgive the black Cooper?
Put another way, would a white Cooper simply look over (or beyond) or even consider for even the shortest moment a black Cooper’s “suffering”?
More: would a white Cooper create “greater principles” out of whole cloth and then publicly wrestle with them?
These queries answer themselves when one considers the family of police-murdered Botham Jean and the black female judge in that case. The good judge not only allowed his brother to forgive and then actually hug Botham’s murderess. Amazingly, she herself performed virtually the selfsame ritual by hugging the killer-cop in open court, and then presented her with her own personal Bible for comfort while she served the lightest of possible prison sentences (handed down by the very same judge).
And then there are select family members of the Charlotte Nine who tearfully, publicly, “forgave” Dylan Roof for his mass murder of their relatives.
And now we come to the appropriately named Christian Cooper.
How many teary-eyed white families have we witnessed who so earnestly, so painfully, so publicly, and so sorrowfully forgave their loved ones’ black murderer?
Again, would a white Cooper so quickly, so easily, so readily forgive a black Cooper?

Black Resistance
As well, obviously, Christian Cooper does not know of, or does not recognize, or simply ignores, the tragedy-filled but powerful five-century-long history of black resistance against white supremacy and white racism.
Obviously, Christian Cooper has not read the consummate lawyer/historian, Dr. Gerald Horne’s (University of Houston) meticulous histories of black slave resistance: “The Apocalypse of Settler Colonialism — “The Roots of Slavery, White Supremacy, and Capitalism in Seventeenth Century North America and the Caribbean,” (2018); or his “The Counter-Revolution of 1776 — Slave Resistance and the Origins of the United States of America” (2014).
And I seriously doubt that Christian Cooper is familiar with Professor Nell Painter’s (Princeton) magisterial “The History of White People” (2010).
It is also highly unlikely that Christian Cooper is familiar with Frederick Douglass’ famous dictum:

“Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never has and it never will!”

And surely Christian Cooper missed Minister Louis Farrakhan’s declaration that the days of forgiving white people for dehumanizing us, for murdering us, are over and done with.

Black Betrayal
In each of Dr. Horne’s seminal tomes referred to above, he points out that there have been thousands of known and even more unknown/undocumented black revolts and rebellions, beginning from the first moments of the Atlantic Slave Trade. He allows, however, that there has only been one successful such revolution: The Haitian Revolution against French colonizers and slavers from August of 1791 to December of 1804.
Why did all of those other uprisings fail? Dr. Horne posits that in each and every case, there was at least one “good” slave (or after slavery, a “good” Negro) who would “run and tell that.”
Those good slaves and good Negroes were and are nothing more and nothing less than betrayers of their own people, traitors to their own people.
Finally, and more recently, the black people of South Africa fought tooth and nail against their white, Dutch oppressors from 1647, when their ship foundered off the Cape of Good Hope, right up until 1994 when black South Africa finally elected its first black president, Nelson Mandela. How did they deal with their traitorous brethren and sisters:

In the South African context, Necklacing is more than a term denoting arts and crafts. It is, rather, a form of summary execution, perhaps even a template or model as to how this latest generation of “woke” or “conscious” black people may have to adapt and adopt.

Freiheit Reich #racist forum.nationstates.net

*During a thread on Affirmative Action*

Many white liberals love playing the role of hero to blacks whom they view as helpless children. It makes them feel superior to be 'helpful' to the 'poor and ignorant blacks' who need a great white hero to save them. Liberals are sometimes the biggest racists around. They talk about encouraging black pride and then say that blacks can't compete fairly with whites.

I think every race should be expected to stand on their own 2 feet. Treat everybody equal and lets see how things turn out.

Rabbi Moshe Averick #fundie algemeiner.com

Al Sharpton and the Lynching of George Zimmerman

As jury selection continues in the trial of George Zimmerman for what are obviously trumped up charges of second degree murder, let us focus on the malevolent undercurrents that are animating this drama. One might be tempted to call the entire affair a miscarriage of justice but in using that metaphor we would be guilty of understatement. More appropriate: A Kermit Gosnell style late-term murder/abortion of justice.

After the shooting death of Trayvon Martin, George Zimmerman was released by the Sanford Police. Why? For the obvious reason that his claim of self-defense was perfectly reasonable and there was no probable cause to charge him with anything at all.

[...]

The lesson to be learned from Jim Crow and racial oppression is that justice is justice and truth is truth no matter what color the alleged victim or perpetrator. Many blacks and liberal whites who bend over backwards to show how “black” they are, seem to feel that the lesson learned is: It’s fine to lynch, as long as it’s a white man accused of shooting a black man.

George Zimmerman is being sacrificed on the altar of the liberal/progressive gospel. That gospel states that white racism is among the most powerful forces driving events in the United States of America. If there is excessive unemployment in the black community, the cause is always white racism. If black students are failing in school, the cause is always white racism. If a black man is killed by a white man or policeman, the cause is always white racism. If the black community is rife with drugs, prostitution, street gangs, out of wedlock children, and men who refuse to take responsibility for the women they impregnate and the children they sire, the cause is always white racism. Facts – for example: the one thing a young black man must actually fear more than anything else in this country is being murdered by another young black man – are irrelevant, as are reason and logic. The inherent irrationality within this gospel is evidenced by the accusation, that demanding proof of identity before voting is also motivated by white racism (is it racist to require an ID before boarding an airplane?).

Jim #racist blog.jim.com

[On black migrants in Europe]

These guys were sleeping in mud and thatch huts before they came, if they were not sleeping in the long grass. Now they get a house some white man built. And when they turn that house into a burned out ruin, after the fashion of Detroit, built by whites, burned by blacks, they will complain of racism and systematic discrimination because whites still have nicer stuff than they do, so they need to take more white stuff and wreck it also.

Blacks are like locusts. They take the stuff that white people built, for example the American inner city, destroy it, and then move on to take something else. They cannot be stopped because the state apparatus forbids white collective self defense, while encouraging black collective rioting, encouraging collective attacks on random isolated whites motivated by black hatred of whites and black sense of collective identity. This raises the cost of housing for white people to unaffordable levels, preventing family formation.

Whites move out from their houses because of state sponsored collective black violence, as is happening now in Baltimore and Ferguson, and blacks move in to houses white people built.

independentthinker32 #fundie imdb.com

[I have no clue how the idea that gay whites don't believe in God connects to the film "Milk", but he manages to do so...]

I known this will sound homophobic(which i'm not)or racist(which i'm not)but the truth is most, not all, gay whites are trying to destroy the sanctity of marriage and now that they have been defeated they are taken their devilish anger out on their usual target...Black people of all faiths. Even Black homosexuals are feeling the wrath of the gay whites. Black homosexuals have been sexually and physically assaulted by these people and the number of attacks have increased since THEIR assault on Black people, Jesus Christ and Christianity began. Swams of gay whites have verbally accausted Black people in gay hubs like San Fransico and New York City. An innocent Black man was beaten by a animalistic gang of gay whites just days after marriage was protected. Thankfully, the gay whites didn't effect him with sodomy(which has been one of the methods of terrorism the gay whites have been planning to use on gay white message boards).

This is a clear indication of the gay white agenda to indoctrinate America with demonistic ideas and to make Black America feel the hatred seething from the pours of the gay whites. Everyone, especially Black people, should know the level of hatred the gay whites have for Black people and why they are using their efforts to rewrite Christianity and to discriminate against Black people.

Black people have been saying for years how the gay whites have been trying to usurp the civil rights movement because the gay whites resent the fact that Black people want to be seen as humans and are not just some mandigo type of caricature that the gay whites can act out their sick, sexual fantasies on. These people never cared about the civil rights movement. remember, where were the gay whites when Black people were being sprayed with hoses and had dogs attacking them? Bath houses, that's where! These people hate the fact that a Black person is now president, they hate the fact that a Black man can marry a Black woman and they hate the fact that a Black CHILD can breathe the same air that a gay white can. Now they are ganging together and planning attacks against Black people EVERYWHERE!

Black poster, know who you are dealing with and stop thinking just because a white person is gay that means they don't hate you. Remember, it was the gay whites that called Black people a n199er in California, just like the KKK and the neo nazis.

One_Advocate #racist newsweek.com

White people should adopt kids their own race and leave our African-American children alone. People tend to think that black kids are "safe" in the hands of white folk, but they flip out seeing a white child in the hands of a black.

If I were this brother, I would turn that child back in to the agency, and get one of our own children. Black people should NEVER consider having a white child anywhere around them. Look at what they are doing to their own children! Raping them with foreign object, stuffing their bodies in suitcases and throwing them into rivers, shooting them in masses and more. No black child is safe in the hands of a white person.

They didn???t want anything to do with our children before. When their images start to fail, and they aren???t popular anymore like Madonna, they start finding strength in acting like they are doing something positive for black children. Strength in doing for blacks has always been. These white folk can???t do a damn thing for our children, and we as a black people need not to start trying to be cute and adopting white kids, regardless.

White people think that because we have a Black President in the White House, that it gives them a ???Black??? pass. They think that every black in the world is alright with them now. How sadly mistaken they are. We didn???t want anything to do with white folk before Obama, and his election didn???t make us feel any different about them now. They are still the dumbest, weakest, useless race around.

There was a time that they would KILL black men for even looking at their women. Leave their offspring that comes out of their white women the hell alone.

Black folk? Leave those white children right where they are! Take that child back to the agency and give her up, and act like you know. This will put an end to all of the bull that you are going through.

- C.J. Brooks

Fading Light #racist stormfront.org

The Importance of Appearances to Opponents of White Nationalism

I was recently watching the video made from a broadcast by William Pierce in which he discussed the dissolution of Haiti into savagery after the Blacks committed mass genocide against the Whites who had created a high civilization there. He discussed the three occasions since that time in which Whites came back to the island and rebuilt civilization, only to end up leaving again—fortunately not due to mass murder by the Negroes on these other more recent occasions. All three times the rapid decay of civilization occurred again despite the resource-rich environment and the priceless gift of a very large head-start to proceed from, making it pretty hard for liberals to support a rational argument that the miserable state there can be blamed on Whites holding the Blacks back.

The really interesting part, however, was Pierce’s paraphrasing of Hesketh Prichard’s book, Where Black Rules White, A Journey Across and About Hayti:

“To the Haitians, the imitation of civilization is as good as the real thing. They believe that if they are able to dress like White men and speak the White man’s language and mimic the White man’s institutions, then they are as good as White men.”

Blacks, and in fact non-Whites in general, lack the intellectual capacity to comprehend the difference between form and substance. Appearances are all that matter to them. A Black man who is dressed in a suit and handed a high position in society that traditionally belongs to a White man is, in the eyes of himself and his fellow Negroes, every bit as good as a White man would be in that position simply because their inferior minds cannot comprehend the deeper requirements and necessities of filling the role.

Barack Obama is a perfect example of this. Having been handed every advantage in life out of race-pity—so many positions of power entirely unearned and unmerited—he is seen by non-Whites as a success despite being entirely bankrupt of any meaningful achievements in those positions, from his utter failure to turn out even a single paper during his time as president of the Harvard Law Review, to the over 300 roll-call votes he neglected to participate in as a U.S. senator, to the Nobel Peace Prize he was handed within days of being elected president with absolutely no accomplishment to warrant it. The suit is his success. The title is his success. His actual efforts (or lack thereof) are immaterial to them.

The truly disturbing part of all this, however, is that those same empty appearances are also just as good as the real thing to a very large group of White people: liberals. We see this every day on Stormfront, where our opponents eternal lambaste us about “discrimination based on SKIN COLOR.” Appearance is all that matters to a liberal. The idea that race involves more than skin tone is beyond their mental comprehension. A White person who is spray-painted brown has magically transmuted into a person of African descent. His genes have changed. His ancestry has been rerouted. Nothing but bewildered agitation results when we show them images of albino Negroes who are still quite obviously members of the Black race despite an exceedingly light skin tone.

This inability to fathom content over appearance is a critical element of which we must be aware if we are to understand our opponents’ methods. As childish as it seems, as embarrassingly simple-minded as it may strike us, it truly is the very core basis of their approach to solving problems. For example, under the Obama regime, the National Crime Victimization Survey has stopped tabulating crimes by race because, to anti-Whites, if the truth of Black crime can no longer be SEEN, it no longer exists. Black-on-White crimes are routinely concealed from the public by the Jew-controlled media because, to the leftists, that makes those crimes rare. The fact that this does nothing about the actual crime rates escapes their comprehension. Dzhokhar Tsarnaev and George Zimmerman were just two of the recent examples of non-Whites being portrayed in the media with photographic adjustments to make their skin lighter because, to liberals, that makes them White.

This thinking (if that word can even correctly describe it) fits with virtually every social reform the left has ever attempted or proposed. In affirmative action, the NUMBER of non-Whites employed in various fields is to be increased even though the individuals being handed these jobs are not competent to do them. Liberal teachers in secondary education have been caught repeatedly giving non-Whites passing grades even though their academic performance was below the requisite threshold because, to them, a student who is simply given an A is every bit as smart as a student who earned an A. Money is to be transferred at gunpoint to non-Whites because a large income means success even if the recipient of the income did nothing to earn it and entirely lacks the monetary skills to retain it or use it rationally.

And it goes on into every other realm of their interference: Homosexual couples are to be treated like heterosexual couples because, if they are spoken of in exactly the same way as the commitment-bearing, sane members of that greatest of Western family institutions, the enormous rates of homosexual promiscuity and venereal infection will cease to exist. Politically correct speech laws are to be imposed on us because not being allowed to say anything “offensive” is exactly the same thing as not disagreeing with liberals (according to liberals at least).

I think they are going to get an especially painful lesson from that particular mistake pretty soon. This, too, is something we hear from them constantly on Stormfront: They literally believe that if there aren’t throngs of Whites standing up and speaking against their destruction of our race and civilization, they have won the war. They honestly believe that our silence in public means we will forever comply with their agenda. It’s the cognitive attitude of a five-year-old child, but it is the very best of which they are capable.

Liberals are, in every way, the appearance people, regardless of their race: They are the ones who achieve beauty not through superior genetics, but through hair dye, breast implants, nose jobs, colored contacts, skin-whitening creams . . . and sex-change operations for their mentally ill masses who pretend that genetics changes when the outside looks different. Beauty to a liberal truly is skin deep (at least right up until the revolting, dysgenic children start popping out).

I recently watched a video in which the narrator was discussing the enormous number of instances of Black rappers whose “bling” is actually fake because, to them, wearing imitation gold jewelry made of plastic is every bit as indicative of success as being able to afford the real thing. The video went on to cite numerous instances of camera tours of actors’ multimillion-dollar homes where it turned out that the home being shown wasn’t even actually theirs. The expensive cars they are seen in are very often rented. In a recent incident in which a Black actress’s pearl dress for the Oscars was stolen and described as being worth as much as ten million dollars, it turned out that the pearls were fake and the dress's true worth was less than $200.

The same appearances work for intelligence: Taking a Black actor and shoving him in front of a camera parroting some lines of sapient dialog makes all Blacks just as smart as Whites. A false claim on Wikipedia about performing the first ever operation separating conjoined twins turns a mediocre Black surgeon into the smartest doctor ever. A list of entirely fictitious Black (or Jewish) inventions "proves" the worth of those parasitic inferiors to White civilization. Nobel Prizes handed out for political reasons make Jews smart. An empty assertion about "jobs Americans just won't do" (whatever the heck that even means) makes illegal invaders from Mexico a boon to our economy. I would bet a quadrillion Zimbabwe dollars that the subhuman citizens of that cesspit nation feel rich as they walk around bearing arm-loads of bills covered in zeroes that aren’t worth the paper they are printed on. It’s all the same thing.

So now you know why our opponents lie to us here all the time. To their weak, pathetic little minds, the lie changes reality the instant they utter it. Explains quite a lot, doesn't it!

Yoozi #racist reddit.com

Displacing low income blacks into the suburbs is a net gain for liberals. It spreads out democrat votes from cities (democratic strongholds with 70-90% liberal voters) into conservative areas. It abates high density areas of low income blacks, which reduces the rate that they victimize each other (i.e. southside Chicago with its black on black murders).

It also puts less stress on the remaining groups in cities. With reduced exposure to black street crime and underperforming schools, there's less pressure on Asians and Hispanics, making it easier for them to start and grow families (more Democrat votes in the long run).

Ron Unz wrote an article a while back on how proximity to lower income blacks shifts whites to the political right. By reducing urban liberal white exposure to poor blacks, you reduce the rate at which they move to the suburbs and become conservatives. By sending the same dysfunctional blacks into the suburbs, you put more stress on conservative communities (triggering white flight further into the exburbs and making raising families more expensive for them). However, they already vote conservative so them swinging futher right it isn't a net gain for the Republicans.

In many ways, the Trump presidency is a pushback from older/established America (white conservatives and blacks) against the new America (white liberals, Asians, Hispanics). Ben Carson is a smart man and I'm sure he knows that being shut out of the cities denies future generations of his people from huge opportunities for social mobility and therefore will do what he can to oppose this trend. I'm sure this is why Trump picked him as HUD secretary as well.

Debbie Dish #racist amazon.com

Take, for example, his writings on white hypocrites when it comes to racial integration. He writes, "But the most transparent hypocrisy [on the part of white liberals] pertains to racial integration and diversity, which white liberals claim are vitally important and sources of great national strength, but from which they assiduously shield and disengage themselves and their families. Indeed, on no other issue are fecklessness and dishonesty more evident than the myth of integration. *All* white liberals claim to believe in it, and *all* white liberals fail to practice it."

In other words, white liberal hypocrites say one thing and do another when it comes to racial realities, such as where to buy a home and where to send their children to school. Borzellieri points out that not one prominent white liberal has ever bought a home in a black neighborhood, despite their assurances that such a move would be a "strength." A strength for thee, but not for me, I guess.

Mr. Bond #racist youtube.com

(Lyrics to song "White America (ANTI-JEW EDITION)" a parody of "White America" by Eminem)

[Intro]
America! You're dying
What happened to this beautiful 90% white
country of ours, the European culture and heritage it was built upon and the traditions that men thought they would die for to protect?
The women and men who have broke their necks
For the freedom of speech the United States government has sworn to uphold… Or so we're told
(If you still don't know what the fuck is going on, you better listen to this)

[Verse 1]
I never woulda dreamed in a million years I'd see
So many young Europeans red-pilled like me
Who share the same views and the same exact beliefs
it's like a fucking army marchin' in back of me
Jewish lies and deflections, have our anger aimed
In no particular direction, just sprays and sprays
while fake news and disinformation, plays and plays
'Til it stays stuck in your head, and you hate your race
Who woulda thought, posting frogs, merchants
and pics of Hitler, with some statistics
looking for some libs to trigger
That we would catapult to the forefront of politics?
How could I predict our memes
Would have an impact like this?
We must have rustled some elite jimmies up in ZOG office
'even Congress was kvetching
We're causin' nothin' but problems
cause we oppose being displaced by our own governments
I'm lovin' it, they been anti-white all my life
We've had enough of it …

[Hook]
White America, we built this nation from scratch
White America, then the Jews gave it to Blacks
White America, they put us in unpayable' debt
but our children won't be slaves no we're taking it back
White America, we built this nation from scratch
White America, then the Jews gave it to Blacks
White America, they put us in unpayable' debt
but our children won't be slaves no we're taking it back

[Verse 2]
Look at my eyes, baby blue, baby just like yourself
a million years evolution, they got under their belt
shady Jews making moves trying to plunder our wealth
and they induce crazy views playing humble and frail
Let's do the math: if we were African our IQ would be half; I just have to read Charles Murray's Bell Curve to know that
Yet they push these stupid rappers like it's cooler being black
till we're all wiggers and niggerfucking zoophiliacs
so deracinated we don't give a fuck that we're white
group cohesion is evil goy, it always leads to a Reich
which is why you need to be castrated just look at your past
And then they cry when we light a fire up under their ass
when the fascism and NatSoc is back at the top
and the laughter has stopped cause the hate of the Saxon cannot, be put back in the box
parasites go, wow
if not Whitey who will be working for our benefit now

[Hook]
White America, we built this nation from scratch
White America, then the Jews gave it to Blacks
White America, put us in unpayable' debt
but our children won't be slaves no we're taking it back
White America, we built this nation from scratch
White America, then the Jews gave it to Blacks
White America, put us in unpayable' debt
but our children won't be slaves no we're taking it back

[Verse 3]
See I'm the voice of White kids in a world of shit
we inherited from our parents as a birthday gift
about our future, boomers never gave two squirts of piss
they just wanted to splurge without disturbances
but their disillusioned youth figured out who's to blame
and they flip cause suddenly traitors and Jews get named
we mixed humor and racism and kids were hooked right in
fed up with all the hate against people who look like them
now we put their narratives under our microscope
expose the lies they told, we are like this rope
Waitin' to choke, tightenin' around Shlomo's throat
while he's yelling "crime-think, shut it down, I'm exposed!"
All I hear is: "nazi, nazi, time to end all this white supremacist patriarchy" from kikes and feminists, commies
telling women that man is the problem, and chopping the dick off a toddler
cause you think his gender is wrong is an commendable option
but this degenerate present has us reminiscing the past
when the same satanic shit was met with swastika flags shit
so now the Führer is our closest pal
Our posterchild, the motherfuckin' spokesman now, for…

[Hook]
White America, we built this nation from scratch
White America, then the Jews gave it to Blacks
White America, put us in unpayable' debt
but our children won't be slaves no we're taking it back
White America, we built this nation from scratch
White America, then the Jews gave it to Blacks
White America, put us in unpayable' debt
but our children won't be slaves no we're taking it back

[Outro]
Make no mistake it was the Aryans that came to America,
that gave this great nation its character
only to be subverted and fleeced by a semitic elite
that later drove them to fight their own kin oversees
the same parasitic, venomous tribe that's been plaguing our race
since the beginning of time
is still the ringleader of this circus of worthless traitorous whores
we call our democratically elected representatives
and the main purveyor of this sick depravity that we call modern western culture
Fuck democracy! Fuck you Jews!
Fuck you with the freest of speech this Divided States of Weimerica will allow me to have! Fuck you!?

RiderOnTheStorm #racist stormfront.org

Here's another insulting ad. In the December National Geographic is an ad for Tassimo coffee maker. The title is "FAMILY BONDING". It shows a white mother, mulatto kid, and black husband. It is insulting to whites by showing white women preferring black men. It even insults black women by showing black men preferring white women.

Advertisers, you need to wake up to the fact that White Nationalists do not fit your stereotype of uneducated lower class whites. Very many of us are educated and have good incomes. Witness the fact that I, a White Nationalist, subscribe to National Geographic. By insulting us you turn many people off to your products. I will NEVER by a Tassimo coffee maker til the day I die. And I will never buy anything from Starbucks Coffee, Gevalia, or Milka as you show their trademarks in your ad.

JohnG911 #racist dailycaller.com

And white privilege means you're TWICE as likely to be shot by police - even though blacks are 150 times more violent than whites. And white privilege means you're more likely to receive the death penalty - even though blacks commit well over half of all murders. And white privilege means you're more likely to be incarcerated - even though blacks commit more crimes and more repeat crimes. And white privilege means you're more likely to receive a traffic citation - even though blacks commit more traffic violations. And white privilege means you're more likely to be prosecuted for a hate crime - even though blacks commit 25 times as many violent crimes against whites.

Young black men represent just over 1% of the population and they commit 53% of all murders but there are more whites sitting on death row than blacks. Blacks commit more felonies than whites but America's prisons have a higher number of whites than blacks. Statistically, Americans are nearly 2800 times more likely to be killed by a black than a Muslim terrorist.

The Priss Factory #racist unz.com

If anything, the possibility that there are many smart blacks should be all the more reason why whites should keep black Africans out of the West.
It’s like the apes became all the more threatening when a smart one appeared among them in CONQUEST OF THE PLANET OF THE APES. These smart Igbos are gonna come to the West, gain elite power, and lead the dumb negroes against whites. Also, these igbo negro men will use white wombs to create a race of mulattoes to rule over whites and blacks. Hell with mulattos hatched by race traitor scum bitches.
It will mean more blacks will enter elite institutions of the West, take more white women, and take more powerful positions in all walks of society and then use their power to steer the West toward more pro-African positions. Let Africa be pro-Africa and let blacks be pro-black.

West and whites should be pro-west and pro-white, and this means seeing the black race as the #1 enemy of the white race. A race is sound only when it holds onto its homeland and when the women of the race respect their own men and feel it is an honor to use their wombs to produce children of her own race.
But with all these Negroes in the West, we got jungle fever and white women using wombs to produce disgusting mulatto obama-babies. We have white women who feel proud to have mulatto babies growing in their bellies while black men put their hands on the belly. What kind of white male with any pride could tolerate such foulness?

We have white boys beaten up by black kids in schools. We have white guys turned into disgusting cuckolds and wussy-ass maggots. White guys are gonna become to the Negro what yellow guys have become to non-yellows in America. Do white guys wanna be second-rate males in their own homeland?

If this negro writer is right and there are plenty of smart negroes, it is all the worse for the white race that needs to wake up to the threat posed by ghastly negroes.

dead_gamer #racist reddit.com

My view is a chain of things. One end is keeping blacks as perpetual victims the other end is keeping dems perpetually in government positions.
Over reporting anti black crime (so very little of actual examples) and under reporting or ignoring anti white violence helps perpetuate the myth of blacks being the victims of relentless white racism. This prevents looking too closely at claims that blacks need help. The need ensures black dependancy, to which they don't absolutely need but agree to play along for an increasingly more comfortable free ride which ensures blacks voting for dems since rebs usually support anti welfare state policies.

Key to the dems plan is the illusion of sweet and innocent and oppressed blacks persecuted by us evil whites.
My very hypothetical theory is that through evolutionary psychology (which probably isn't a real science) whites overdeveloped a sense of empathy. We have a very strong desire to appease and placate people who present as offended or injured. Making the claim that you've been wronged is a figurative cheat code for getting god mode on whites.

Over 10s of thousands of years the people who didn't capitulate and cooperate with others had a smaller chance to survive and reproduce. So those of us with a propensity to accept a position of guilt had more children. So to that extent we LOVE being the cause of a problem, and we reject strongly suspicions that the 'injured party' is insincere. I'm not only certain blacks lack this, I'm pretty sure that they can see this in us and manipulate it, the smarter ones anyway.

Unnamed Black Lives Matter Preschool Teacher Activist #racist theblaze.com

A self-proclaimed preschool teacher grabbed a megaphone and reportedly told a crowd during a protest against Republican President Donald Trump that “we need to start killing people” and “we need to start killing the White House.”

Wearing a Black Lives Matter T-shirt, the teacher unleashed the F-bomb-laced rant against whites, the White House, presidents, capitalism and police reportedly in Seattle on Saturday night.

“F*** white supremacy, f*** the U.S. empire, f*** your imperialist ass lives. That s**t gotta go,” the teacher said, before adding that white people need to give reparations to “black and indigenous people right now.”

“White people, give your f***ing money, your f***ing house, your f***ing property, we need it f***ing all!” the teacher continued, adding, “Pay the f*** up. Pay the f*** up. It ain’t just your f***ing time, it’s your f***ing money, and now your f***ing life is devoted to social change.”

That was just the warm-up.

“And we need to start killing people,” the teacher soon added. “First off, we need to start killing the White House. The White House must die. The White House, your f***ing White House, your f***ing presidents, they must go! F** the White House!”

The rapt crowd let loose cheers as another protester said: “Burn it!”

Before slamming the crowd for being “fixated” on an over-and-done election, the teacher actually criticized former President Barack Obama, noting he “deported so many f***ing people” and soon added that “capitalism is … f***ing racism.”

The teacher also urged the crowd to “throw that f***ing cop car in the garbage. That s**t has got to go. That s**t has got to go. F*** all that s**t.”

And for the finale, the teacher said “f*** your respectability. F*** you side-eyeing motherf***ers, ’cause I know … in the back of your f***ing head y’all got s***t to dismantle, whether it’s your motherf***ing patriarchy, your motherf***ing anti-blackness, anti-queerness … not recognizing black and brown trans, queer, women and femmes and non-binary people have motherf***ing led the f***ing way. So kiss their motherf***ing feet and give them your f***ing money and walk the f*** away after.”

Pastor James David Manning #fundie rightwingwatch.org

Far-far-right pastor James David Manning is at it again, this time hailing anti-gay leaders in Uganda, Gambia and Nigeria for resisting “this son of Satan Barack Hussein Obama” and his “anti-integrity, anti-life, anti-humanity, anti-universal understanding, anti-DNA” gay rights agenda.

Manning said that the decisions of Jason Collins and Michael Sam to come out of the closet are proof that “Obama has released these demons particularly upon the black males, this homosexual demon, hoping to influence as many black males to subscribe to ideas that are [as] homosexual, perverted, LGBT as possible.”

Obama has released the homo demons on the black man; look out black woman, a white homo may take your man.” He said that under Obama’s direction, black men “are being scooped up by white homos,” thus destroying the black family. [Emphasis added]
_ _ _

"The white homo is now moving into the black neighborhoods, looking for black men that have been converted into homosexuality. Black woman let me say something to you: You will have a very hard time competing against a white homosexual male, he’s usually got money, a white homo usually has an American Express card, he usually has an opportunity at the theatre, homos love the theatre, they love to go out to dinner parties, they love that kind of a thing. As a black woman you can’t compete not only with the financial strength of a white homo, black sister, this is devastating, black people need to rise up en masse and recognize the utter destruction that Obama is going in to destroy the black family with his homosexual statements and release of demons that he has done."

northpal #racist renegadetribune.com

With Jews We Lose – Kentuckians Write In Robert Ransdell for US Senate in 2014

Now the concise presentation of the platform for the campaign.

If Kentuckians write-in Robert Ransdell as their choice for Senator in the 2014 election they will support his plan to fix America by pursuing the following:

1. We take back the media through government action from the Jews who currently wield it in a hostile manner toward the nation, especially Whites in America.

2. We improve the economy by attacking without mercy the concept of globalism, eliminating all foreign aid to non-White third world nations, all nations controlled by Zionist interests, and first and foremost eliminate all aid to Israel, also end all domestic aid and handouts to non-Whites, and finally disband and dissolve the Jewish-run Federal Reserve and overhaul the American stock market and the way that has worked for decades.

3. We eliminate the Muslim terror threat by first eliminating all support for Israel and then by additionally deporting all Muslims out of the American nation back to the Arab world.

4. We deal with the problem of Black-on-White crime by putting a halt to the status quo which is to just highlight the problem on the Internet and complain about hypocrisy and by taking action to put an end to the problem itself. Ultimately we need a Whites-only America and living space so the savage nature of Blacks is no longer a threat to the safety of our people and the order of our society. However in the short term we need to fashion a way to protect our people until the time has come for that White nation, and to that end I have proposed the formation of the White Guard in every city in this nation where there is an ongoing problem with regard to Black-on-White crime, non-White-on-White crime in general actually. We need disciplined and courageous young White men on the streets to see to it that our people are kept safe when in areas the system has flooded with Blacks, the system’s half measures and excuses are no longer to be tolerated, the time has come for White men to stand for their people in the streets.

5. We deal with illegals flooding our borders by adopting a shoot on sight policy. Non-White immigration into the country is to be halted and a program of annihilating the effects of integration is to be pursued. I am open to diplomatic solutions with regard to this but will not compromise on the need for a Whites only nation in America, a vote for me will forever end multiculturalism and racial diversity in America.

6. We deal with the drug problem in this country by giving our people a reason to live again, by giving them good jobs and not allowing those jobs to be sent to another country, by not promoting drugs and excess in the media, by giving them hope by delivering an honest and honorable government that gives them hope for the future. We attack the source of why they even looked to drugs in the first place by pursuing this policy.

7. We improve health care by pursuing cures and not simply treatments, by no longer putting first the profits of health care corporations and putting the welfare of the White citizen first. We take care to improve the food supply. We encourage healthy living in our citizens. We end all aid and assistance to non-Whites who take out much more out of the system than they put in, and with the new health care law will in even more increasing numbers if radical change is not taken to make America a White America.
The campaign will stand in support of the end of abortion of White babies, in favor of liberty to own and possess firearms, and against the promotion and tolerance of homosexuals in our society. This campaign also believes that if power is attained that it must be utilized and that swift and decisive action must be taken to overcome the underhanded and crooked nature of the Jews and their servants, but that after those elements are dealt with a non-intrusive regime and a government that is not overbearing with regard to its interaction with citizens is what would be called for.I am committed to being forthright and direct with regard to my opinion and stance on any other issue that might not have been addressed in this platform. Any questions regarding anything not discussed here can be asked via the contact form on this site. If I have a stance on the issue I will then make it known.Read more and contact Robert at http://www.whiteguard.us

E W. Jackson #conspiracy rightwingwatch.org

Religious Right preacher E.W. Jackson dedicated a good portion of his radio program yesterday to laying out his theory that men wearing earrings is the result of a liberal effort to emasculate black men.

Jackson asserted that in the 1980s, an “androgyny movement” emerged that sought to convince people that “the coolest thing was to be neither male nor female.” One of the ramifications of this effort, he claimed, is that there is now a “fad,” especially among black men, that “has come into vogue of men wearing these great big ol’ diamond earrings in both ears.” Jackson argued that this is a trend that is “emasculating men” and “denying men their masculinity.”

“I’m not saying that men who wear that kind of stuff are homosexual,” Jackson declared. “I just think that they don’t realize that they’ve gotten caught up in a movement and they don’t understand what the movement is really trying to achieve.”

Jackson asserted that the “androgyny movement” and modern efforts to combat “toxic masculinity” were started by racist white liberals in order to emasculate and feminize black men.

“I really believe that white liberals in particular are much more comfortable with effeminate black men,” he said. “I really believe that and I think that does go back to the myth of the hyper-animalistic sexual black male. Because I really believe that the real racism in America today is to be found in the precincts of white liberals because they really have decided they know what it means to be black better than black people know and if you meet their criteria, then you are okay. And if you do not, they’re going to do everything they can to destroy you. I’m a personal living witness of that. So I think they really don’t like black people unless they fit the mold that they have created for them, which, to me, is no different than slavery and Jim Crow.”

“I really believe that that stuff is primarily directed to black men that liberals want to emasculate because they don’t want them thinking for themselves, they don’t want them standing up for themselves, they don’t want them being themselves,” Jackson said. “They want them to fit the mold that the liberal ideology has prescribed for them. Now, folks, by any definition you want to create, that’s racist.”

Philly Rabbit #racist libertydwells.com

Black On White Crime Is Enormous, Happens Every Day, But It'sTaboo to Discuss.

All you ever hear about is Zimmerman, Zimmerman, Zimmerman from his haters with many of them wanting him dead. But what about black on white crime and especially black on white murder homicide? If it wasn't for the internet, the media would have all these crimes buried and out of sight for the viewing public. The recent outbreak of media stories on the internet involving crimes committed by blacks on whites are too numerous for me to paste here including the story of the world war two vet who was murdered but this is a serious problem that needs to be addressed.

A black activist on another site explained that these crimes of murder against whites should be expected out of payback for three hundred years of black oppression by whites. So this I suppose means that whites are supposed to grin and bear it as their punishment for being white whenever black punk thugs lay slaughter to their children and loved ones.

This is political correctness absolute insanity and it's high time white people start discussing this openly among themselves and with everybody else.

jamesd127 #racist educationrealist.wordpress.com

Segregation was a form of affirmative action. The intent of the policy was to have good quality blacks ruling over ordinary blacks, analogous to the caliphate policy for dealing with ethnic diversity.

For which they needed black lawyers, black judges, black businessmen, etc – who needed, and received, protection from white competition.
Segregation manufactured a black middle class to govern ordinary blacks, a middle class that had real work to do, unlike the soul destroying makework done by today’s black middle class.

Ayo Kimathi #racist waronthehorizon.com

ALL OF THE BLACK VICTIMS OF WHITE TERRORISM HAVE BEEN BLACK HETEROSEXUALS!

This is an extremely important fact for us to pay attention to. In amerikkka, we should all be clear that there is an overt sexual war against our children where white perverts promote “homosexuality” and pedophilia to our youth as a viable alternative to normal, healthy sexual development. The impact has been epidemic. But we need to understand that the genocidal war against Black people in amerikkka and Afrikan people worldwide has taken a clear and definitive twist for the worst.

Instead of focusing on the general oppression and abuse of Black people as a global family, white racists have narrowed their assault and made it much more specific and lethal. They are only attacking family-oriented Black family members. More specifically, they are allowing pedophiles, “homosexuals” and lesbians free reign to roam Black communities and practice free enterprise in amerikkka. Only heterosexual Black people who are actively engaged in raising families or have the potential and/or likelihood to raise healthy Black families are being targeted.

Think about it. In almost every story of white-on-Black terrorism and/or murder in the united states of amerikkka over the past decade, all of the Black victims have been obvious heterosexuals. Trayvon Martin, Rekia Boyd, Oscar Grant, Sean Bell, Kathryn Johnston, Mike Brown, Eric Garner, etc . . . In many cases, we see the husbands, wives, boyfriends, and girlfriends of these individuals emotionally grieving over the loss of their loved ones. Too often, there are children and spouses left behind to fend for themselves. And with the explosion of sexual insanity in the Black community and the vulgar, aggressive, and extroverted behavior of the Black “homosexual” community, it is no coincidence that Black “homosexuals” are never the target of police nor general white terrorism.

The 21st Century “homosexual” war against the Black Race significantly intensified after the Million Man March in 1995. After (2) million Black men converged on Washington, DC and showed how quickly we could put together an army of men, whites decided to intensify the war against the Black family to ensure that this kind of organized manhood could never resurface again. “Homosexuality” was their primary tool in their war against our racial progression and for our racial genocide. The following is a brief clip from Sexual Warfare: Black vs. Homos that shows the waging of the homosexual war against the Black Race in the aftermath of the Million Man March of 1995.

What we are witnessing with the recent white terrorist murders by dylann storm roof in Charleston, NC, the murder of Brother Freddie Gray in Baltimore, police assaults on Black families while driving, police terrorism in New York with the “Stop and Frisk,” etc . . . is nothing short of the intensification of the “homosexual” war against Black people. It appears like generic white racial hatred; but it is more than that. It’s the Obama(nation) administration genocidal war against Afrikan people with the destruction of the Black family at the core of its mission. (2) of the current primary tools for the destruction of the Black family are the Effeminization of the Black Male and the promotion of Feminism and Lesbianism. Because these methods have been extremely effective, but aren’t killing Black people at a fast enough rate to satisfy the white supremacist global genocide mission, whites are systematically lashing out at the heterosexual Black population across the globe.

And of course, Barack Insane Obama(nation) has been the key to suppressing our people’s natural inclination to resist white sexual tyranny. If any white president would have sponsored this sexual tyranny against our people while simultaneously unleashing the full blunt of white aggression and violence against our people, Black people around the world would have reacted sharply. But this mulatto has been used to wage a “homosexual” war of genocide on Black people around the Earth and very few Black people have been willing to speak out against his actions. Here is a video that provides a much more in depth look at the impact that Barack Insane Obama has had on Black people since coming into office – Dear Obama.

ghetto bragging rights #racist ghettobraggingrights.wordpress.com

We see them here in 3rd Ward all the time. Even the (white) mommas will bring the daughter over to the ghetto to teach them how to use their bodies to tempt, lure and destroy black males. Often, perceiving they’ll gain infamy, get the pleasure of having black and get killed at the same time, they aspire to become white nationalism’s new black on white crime poster girls. But it’s not just white girls perceiving being robbed, raped and killed as getting the ***WHOLE BLACK MALE SEXUAL EXPERIENCE*** grown white women, white boys and white men are black on white crime / sexual assault thrill seekers too.

Stoopover at Valleyfair?

Stoopover at Valleyfair?

They’ll be they stand on the sidewalk until they see brothers they perceive are dangerous thugs approaching. Then, when the brother passes, they’ll pretend to drop something on the ground and bend over to pick it up. They call it playing ***Stoopover***. Of course the girl and her momma are wearing those high skirts. It is especially inappropriate for the little girl who can be as young as 11, 12 and 13.

When they bend over, neither one of them is wearing no panties.

Brothers just shake their heads. But, then, some brothers might turn around and go back.

While the white girlz in the school houses do the same things. The ones who are getting schooled by their momomas on the streets will take the brothers (as many who want to participate) and start that *rape me role play*.

It’s terrible when the brothers get caught up with them. They are a terrible new breed of women and their daughters.

Like it said: “We need to remind ourselves that they want bad things to happen to them, and that when it happens it’s becuase they deserve it,” says GBR white culture critic Streets Cousins.

“We can foresee a day when white women will no longer want sex from black men and will only want us to violently slay them.” - Kirkland Perkins “It goes all to slavery…

These young girls and their mothers deserve whatever deeds happen to them. They trick brothers into believing they are of age when they are not. Then, when the brothers refuse to rape them, they threaten the brothers by saying they’ll notify the police and tell them the brother(s) were trying to rob or harm them. These girlz need to all need to put in cages.

Dan Roodt #racist amren.com

South Africa Wins Rugby World Cup. Why Does it Give Me No Joy?

In a Rugby World Cup final in Japan, for which most pundits predicted an easy win for England, the South African rugby team won by 32-12 and became world champions for the third time. All over the country, in bars and on the streets, there were celebratory shouts and honking cars with green Springbok team flags flying from their windows.

I do not follow rugby, nor watch so-called Super Rugby on the pay-TV channels. Our bankrupt public TV corporation, the SABC, can no longer afford the rights to broadcast rugby. However, I discovered that I could stream the match in French on my computer. Boris Johnson and I therefore had something in common: We both seem to have followed it live in our respective studies.

If it had been any other opponent, such as New Zealand or Australia, I probably would not have bothered, but losing against England would have been especially bitter. England is the source of our misfortune, a country whose politicians and diplomats have largely destroyed Western civilization in this part of the world. Not only did the English media, rock stars, and even the royal family enthusiastically support the Afro-Marxist terrorist movement known as the ANC, but their Queen also bestowed a knighthood on Robert Mugabe, the dictator to our north. The now deceased Zimbabwean could be called the king of all anti-white blacks. Admittedly, the British did quietly retract the knighthood once the worst of Mugabe’s excesses became known, but still. How dare they? — as Greta Thunberg would say.

Prince Harry of Sussex, the first British royal to marry someone we in South Africa would call “Coloured,” visited the Springbok rugby team in the changing rooms at Yokohama International Stadium after their brilliant victory. Amazingly — or perhaps not — his brief address to the players was not about rugby at all.

“Congratulations,” the red-haired Prince said. “I generally think that rugby has the ability to unite everyone around the world. And I could not think of a nation who needs it more than you guys right now.” And raising a bottle of Heineken given to him by one of the Afrikaner players: “So on that, well done.” He then posed next to the lock (a player in the second row of the scrum) Eben Etzebeth, apparently saying, “F*ck, you’re tall.”
And that’s where rugby, politics, and race collide. For over a century, the Springboks have been very successful against teams from much larger Western countries because of our physical advantages. The torturous evolution we have gone through on the African savanna, being constantly attacked by wild animals, poisonous snakes, and above all, black tribes for whom killing sometimes seems like their form of rugby, seems to have bestowed gifts on us, one of which is size. We are a race of giants. At least you can get that impression from meeting rugby players, especially the tall locks who have to jump for the ball during line-outs.

During the semi-final game against Wales, the two French commentators were clearly biased against the Springboks, hoping the lumbering Welsh team with their heavy pack of forwards grinding toward the goal line would win. However, as it became obvious that the Springboks would carry the day, the two Frenchmen ascribed it to their niveau d’aggressivité (level of aggressiveness).

The Left in South Africa, especially the English Left, has long decried Afrikaner dominance in rugby, which they call a sport for “racist, white males.” Our universities and other leftists have already provided us with endless denunciations of the Afrikaner passion for rugby and its alleged celebration of whiteness, toxic masculinity, racism, and Afrikaner fascism. What the 1936 Olympic Games were to Nazism, we are told, rugby has always been to the Afrikaner.

Since we have been excluded from politics, the military, the police, academia, big business, and soon the church, the game of the egg-shaped ball is perhaps the last thing we are allowed to do. Or not. The relentless demands of affirmative action have seen to it that even rugby is no longer an all-white, all-Afrikaner game. Ever since the days of anti-apartheid protests and sports boycotts, the agile little gazelle that gives the Springboks their team name has been unpopular. Successive sports ministers of the ANC regime have tried to suppress the name, a quintessentially Afrikaans word that does not have an English translation.

South Africa is the only country in the world where there are racial quotas in sport — against whites. Such quotas are essentially aimed at rugby, as well as netball — a sport like basketball but for women — in which Afrikaner women excel. Various complicated rules have accumulated over the years of ANC rule or — more correctly — social engineering. At any given moment, a certain number of “players of colour” have to be on the field. Otherwise, teams are fined, coaches are fired, or sponsors withhold funds.

During the World Cup in Japan, for the first time ever, the Springbok captain was a black player. Siya Kolisi happens be married to a blonde wife with whom he has two children. Most of the media coverage focused on him, as a kind of “miracle man,” and not on the white players.

Inside South Africa, the black players — who are normally less than half of the team — get all the credit and are lauded as “rugby geniuses.” Outside the country, there are sometimes more objective views. One British columnist, Stuart Barnes, was candid enough to write in the London Times before the final game that Captain Kolisi would serve the team best by sitting on the bench:

"Strip the politics and emotion out of the equation and the rugby case for benching Kolisi is powerful. Pieter-Steph du Toit [a white player] has been far more influential in his lineout and counter-rucking than his fellow flanker. He has to start."

Indeed, shortly after the final game, the lamentably white Mr. du Toit was named World Rugby Player of the Year, and the equally white Afrikaner Rassie Erasmus was crowned World Rugby Coach of the Year.

Many commentators, both sports and political, compared this year’s victory and the “sense of unity” it supposedly engendered to the one in 1995 when we beat New Zealand’s All Blacks in the World Cup final in Johannesburg – with one black player on the team. Nelson Mandela ingratiated himself with whites, especially Afrikaners, by donning a number-6 Springbok shirt like the one worn by captain Francois Pienaar, and appearing at the stadium in front of the crowd and the cameras.

During their three decades as an international terrorist group, headquartered in London and supported financially by both the Soviet Union and Sweden, the ANC had always boycotted rugby. The very image of the Springbok was “racist,” and the ANC regime is still trying to have it removed or even banned, like our old South African flag and anthem.

At the time, Mandela’s gesture was called “reconciliation,” but in South Africa, that word means establishing black domination. Not long afterward, Mandela clashed with the rugby administration over affirmative action and racial quotas.

Nearly 30 years later, some are still unsatisfied. On the eve of the final game in Japan, liberal journalist Pieter du Toit wrote:

"Because of its place in history and the architecture of society – a team once rooted in chauvinistic nationalism and exclusion, now diverse, humble and welcoming – the Boks will always be controversial. Whilst many live and breathe the green-and-gold, there are still many for whom it remains symbolic of subjugation and segregation."

Nobody knows the inner feelings of blacks better than liberal white journalists, but in the wake of the Springbok triumph in Japan, “reconciliation,” “unity between the races,” and the slogan “stronger together” are being bandied about by both the media and politicians. Of course, despite the euphoria, we are not together.

In the run-up to the World Cup, the above-mentioned giant, Eben Etzebeth, was accused of assaulting a Coloured man in a bar and calling him the “H-word.” That was “hotnot” in Afrikaans, a shortened form of “Hottentot,” which was the original European word for the primitive hunter-gatherer tribes on the Cape coast, whom we now must call Khoikhoi. “Hottentot” is thought to have originated from the German hotteren-totteren or “stutter,” referring to the click-sound language of the tribes.

The list of taboo words in South Africa grows all the time. In 1996, shortly after the ANC came to power, a Springbok coach, André Markgraaff, was forced to resign after calling one of the new black sports administrators a “kaffir.” South Africa, like the USA, represents a semantic minefield.

As soon as Eben Etzebeth steps off the plane from Japan, he will face the wrath of the South African Human Rights Commission, which has little to do with human rights but more with race-baiting and the persecution of whites who stray from the code of subservience. The head of legal services at the Human Rights Commission has promised that Mr. Etzebeth will be charged with attempted murder.

Rugby, like the Afrikaans language or the very presence of the white minority in South Africa, is a relic of the hated past, but that past, despite all the propaganda efforts to the contrary, is looking increasingly like a lost golden age. It was a time when South Africa was not only winning on the rugby field but also in education, health, construction, industrialization, honest government, municipal services, electricity generation, water treatment, administration, etc. Needless to say, the ANC regime is failing in all these areas and many others. We have blackouts or so-called “load shedding,” and many rural towns do not have potable water.

Even Prince Harry’s “unity” comments echo an awareness of South Africa’s increasing status as a failed state. Rugby is therefore the lone swallow that does not a summer make. The team’s meticulous Afrikaner coach, Rassie Erasmus, who has brought strategy and daring to their game, is a man of yesterday, an anachronism from a time before black sports ministers and the so-called Human Rights Commission.

It gave me a few moments of satisfaction that we had, once more, beaten our arch-rival England, but that soon gave way to a sense of tragedy. Our players, from the gargantuan Eben Etzebeth to the diminutive scrumhalf Faf de Klerk, are gladiators in green-and-gold. Like most gladiators, they are doomed to die in the arena. Instead of their undoubted talent and prowess counting toward the esteem of our Afrikaner nation, they are glorifying the ANC’s zombie nation, as well as the giant corporations whose brands they bear and who are contributing to the demise of whites.

Under apartheid, we had military, economic, energy and financial boycotts against us. In Amsterdam, they threw Afrikaans books in the canal next to South Africa House; elsewhere they spat on our diplomats. But the worst, it seems, was the sports boycott. In a sunny country dedicated to outdoor pursuits, it prevented us from showing off our athletes and our rugby players on the international stage.

Patti Waldmeir, a correspondent for the Financial Times in South Africa during the early ’90s, wrote in her book, Anatomy of a Miracle, that “the Afrikaners swapped apartheid for rugby, and thought they had made a good deal.”

Hence the Faustian Pact that our hapless leaders made with the ANC’s communist politicians: If only we handed them our country, we could play rugby against the All Blacks again — the same New Zealanders who held up placards saying, “Boks go home,” and who spread broken glass on the field in their country where we were supposed to practice.

Like every Faustian Pact, this one was bound to go bad. We have already paid a staggering price, with trillions of rand looted from the state and state-owned companies by corrupt ANC politicians and their cronies. Our infrastructure has been gutted, our environment polluted, our language and culture suppressed.

Rugby is not worth it. Seeing two Afrikaans high-school teams playing each other should satisfy our need for rugby. Why play against other nations from the British imperial system who hate us? It might help if we could have our own team, free of racial quotas and affirmative action. It would be an Afrikaner team, just as there are three national teams in the United Kingdom: Scotland, Wales, and England.

We would fly our orange, white and blue flag, the one which has been officially declared “hate speech” by a South African court. We would play our national anthem, “Die Stem,” at international matches.

This is all unthinkable. Probably the Springbok will be replaced by some ANC symbol soon, just as our street names have been changed. Then the so-called “transformation” of the team will be complete. A few Afrikaner gladiators will still be allowed to play.

Our triumph over England in Japan is a Pyrrhic victory. We have won a game but we have lost a nation, our nation, the real one, not the meretricious, multicultural hodgepodge that the media and the beer advertisements with their gleeful images of blacks and whites “happy together” promote.

I have nothing to celebrate.

Michael Louwe #fundie #racist christiannews.net

michael louwe:
Remember, since the 1960s, the power-crazy White liberals of the Blue States have been pandering for the votes of the Blacks and Hispanics, in order to defeat the White conservatives of the Red States in US Federal elections.
Hence, the self-hating, anti-White and pro-Colored views of the White liberals, eg Elizabeth Warren, Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, Bernie Sanders, etc and yourself(.?). It's all politically-driven.

Floodlight:
Listen to yourself. You are so tied up in knots with ridiculous conspiracy theories you are defending white supremacists.

michael louwe:
If White conservatives who fight for the interests of Whites are White supremacists, then you are a liberal White masocist who is often submissive to the Black and Hispanic supremacists in the Blue States, eg Joe Biden kow-towing to Barack Obama and Eric Holder from 2008 to 2016.

In effect, the power-crazy White liberals/masocists of the Blue States are ignorantly committing racial suicide by pandering for the votes of the Black and Hispanic supremacists, in order to defeat the White conservatives of the Red States in US Federal elections since the 1960s.
That is why the White liberals/masocists like to denigrate White conservatives who fight for White interests as White supremacists, while they hypocritically praise and champion Blacks and Hispanics/Browns who fight for Black and Hispanic/Brown interests, eg the mostly Democrat Black Caucus and Hispanic Caucus in the US Congress.

BlackLieutenant #fundie intjforum.com

Women's Sexuality Is Meaningless Without Men


[Sexuality emerges in stages from the very earliest years of life, when a child discovers that there is something 'down there' and starts to feel around, on through to puberty, and onward from that point to mature understanding of their own and others' sexuality (in an ideal trajectory). Many, many factors can damage that trajectory, social norms being particularly strong.]

First masturbations, especially for girls, can hardly be described has a "sexuality".

Masturbation is "hardly" having a sexuality. And girls and boys sexuality is very different. Girls that has vaginas and can masturbate earlier than boys. But we can't really call it "sexuality", but more "curiosity" (they're not sexually active).
Boys can't really experience sexuality until they produce sperm around early puberty, so for boys it's kinda simple. Personally when I ejaculated the first time, I was 12, I don't think I could've done it earlier.

[Then what can the discovery of what brings your body to orgasm be described as? And, yes, the purpose of masturbation is orgasm. When she feels that sensation and perues it, she's exploring and interacting with her sexuality.]


Female sexuality is different from males. If I'm right, they can experience orgasm before (and after) being sexually active, which is very weird from a natural POV... I don't really thought about this before, but that brings a lot of questions.

Women pleasure is apparently not linked to her sexuality. Whereas men pleasure is completely linked to his sexuality. Do women really "have" a sexuality ? Do these orgasms aren't just illusions to support "men's sexuality" ?


[http://www2.hu-berlin.de/sexology/GE...S/CHILDORG.HTM Your amazing knowledge of female sexuality must surely give you a suave way with Teh Ladeez.]


I still don't think that female orgasm is a "sexuality", if they can have it before and after being "sexually" active, you can't call it "sexuality". I stick to my theory that women doesnt have one, and that female orgasm is just an evolutionary function to make them appreciate "men" sexuality. I can be wrong though.

Men "have" to dominate. We have to dominate animals to get food, we have to dominate our enemies, dangers etc...we have to sexually dominate women to reproduce. Domination is a whole part of what men are.


[1) I love how you're putting human females on the same list as animals, enemies and natural disasters. Like women are 'things' that must be 'done unto.' That's great. (Not.)]


This is not what I meant, humans have to survive through eating and reproducing, so from a male perspective, it's through animals and women


[2) It also implies that, like animals, enemies, and avalanches, women are going to resist the man's efforts. "Get over here, Matilda, it's penis time." "No, no, no!" "I said GET OVER HERE, Tillie. We gotta keep populating the goddamn human race. Don't you try and run out on me!" "NO! NO!" "Shaddup." "Let me go!" "Sorry, kiddo. Gotta dominate ya. I'm a man."]


No not especially with rape, but even in consensual sex, the woman is dominated, because she is penetrated.


[3) But one of your core beliefs appears to be that women are naturally submissive. So why would a man have to dominate someone who has already lain back with stars in her eyes? And if he loves her (and is vanilla), why would he want to?]


Women learn through time and evolution to be submissive, it's not "natural", but I think it's more an evolutionary attitute that was necessary. I assume the submissive ones was the one getting fucked, so maybe women adopted this attitude for procreation/to be attractive. Or maybe they were forced because men were raping them, I don't know. But this attitude is still clearly visible today.


[4) And all of the above is assuming you're even correct that men have to dominate things. You can get food by working WITH the earth instead of against it (e.g. biodynamic farming, free-range animal husbandry, humane slaughtering methods). You can deflect and self-defend against enemies without needing to destroy them. You can (gasp!) have fun in bed with your woman. She'll still get just as pregnant, if that's what you want]


When men wanna have wheat to eat it they have to cut it (kill it), when they wanna eat beef, they have kill it (even if it's nicely), and when there's a venomous snake or a crocodile going next to his 3-year old kid, the man will not just "push it" nicely, he "has" to kill it to be sure the dangerous animals won't come again. And for sex, I never said women shouldnt have fun, but she is dominated (not raped) in any case, because the penetration is domination.


[Yeah, in fantasy, sure. In the "real life" which you believe you're so in touch with, men carry around a significant degree of fear that they're not going to be good enough to be chosen, not going to be hard enough to penetrate, not going to be big enough to satisfy.
Or as the inestimable sage Rihanna put it,
The desire to find a "submissive" woman is the desire to avoid being straight-up challenged like that. The desire to believe that all women are "naturally" submissive, and any woman who thinks otherwise has been manipulated, is complete self-delusion.]


Men that haven't got erectile problems don't ask these questions to themselves (maybe when they turn 50). The "be chosen" part is before the sex, and has nothing to do with the sexual act.

The submissive women love from men just means higher chances to get laid, and more feminine, it has nothing to do with "good, she'll accept my little non-erectile dong when I'll try to get her orgasms". The world is not turning around women desires. And I never said that "all" women are submissive but a big majority, and even if some are not, that's how most men like them.

Some feminists like to say "weak men like submissive women", this is a lot of BS. The submissive women are the ones getting married and laid, that may be why these dry feminists try to turn these women into "strong-dominant" masculine women to be like them.

Look at black women, their feminist non-submissive attitude is the reason why 70% of them are single and 42% never been married. As a black man, I can tell you this is a widely known fact in our community. A lot of white, black western men now have go to China, Russia, Latin America to get their "feminine" submissive women. A black friend is getting married with a chinese woman this year, we talked about it, he is in this case. Sad.

[In other words, you mean black women are insufficiently interested in flattering men's egos.

Gosh, that's horrible. How did blacks survive in the millennia before the diaspora, when black women were the only women around!?!! How do black men who are still on the African continent manage!?? Clearly, the UN needs to start a task force to address this urgent problem. Funds must be raised to enable black men in Africa to import properly submissive females from Thailand.]


American black women were fine and feminine before feminism corrupted them. African non-westernized women are still feminine.

How Black Women SHOULD Treat Black Men



Black men are also responsible for being overrepresented in thugs, prison population, leaving their children alone with their moms, taking drugs, being uneducated, dealing drugs, being affliated with gangs etc...

But responsible black men like me don't find these "strong" "independant" black women attractive. I also find them repulsive physically, I prefer caucasian females so I'm kinda biased... The only black woman I've dated was mixed and was very feminine. A rarity among black women.

PS : I do advocate equal rights, but there's a point where western women "have" to do kids.

[How about if I said to you, "American blacks were fine before the civil rights movement corrupted them"?

There are lots of white Americans who believe this is true. There are lots of white Americans who much preferred to have blacks living under segregation and treating white people with automatic respect lest the Klan pay a visit to their house that night.

These folks became shocked, scared and angry when American blacks started raising their fists to the sky and demanding equal rights as human beings.

They have spent the last fifty years laboring mightily to try and re-frame the civil rights movement as an unpopular, unwanted aberration led by a band of whiny misfits who just wanted special perks.

These people shrewdly concede that, yes, the separate bathroom and separate drinking fountain thing was bad, and they certainly do not advocate returning to THAT state of affairs. No, they certainly want black people to be as free and equal as the day is long. It's just...couldn't the blacks go be free and equal somewhere else? Why, ask these white people, must we be forced to have them in our schools and clubs and workplaces?

Special ire is reserved for blacks who seem "angry." This particular white population is forever on the lookout for "angry" black people. Naturally, therefore, they find them everywhere. They are quite sure that this "anger" would go away, and American blacks would return to their "natural" state of being...well...submissive...if we could just get rid of civil rights and affirmative action.]


I am a black separatist and a pan-africanist, so I don't blame whiteys for wanting their land to be black-free and/or mostly White. I support them.

And I never said women shouldn't have rights.


[Do you see any parallels between the attitude of white American racists towards blacks in general, and your attitude towards black women in particular?]

No. Black women adopted the "feminist" attitude and they lose their feminity. Black (or any) men don't like that.

[Wow. Just...wow. I don't even know what to say.

So I'll say this.

You may not like what black women have to say. You may not like the fact that they dare to say it. But you know what? They're speaking their truth to you.

White and Asian women are trained not to do that. I remember once when I was around 6 or 7 years old, a friend of mine called and invited me over to her house. I didn't feel like going, but I honestly didn't think I had the right to say so. I thought it would be mean, impolite, friendship-shattering. In a panic, I told her I would come, because I simply didn't know what else to do. But, I really didn't want to go. So...I didn't.

She ended up calling me two more times, asking when I was going to show up.

If I had felt free to speak the truth to her--to wound her in a smaller way--I would not have wounded her in the much bigger way I ended up doing.

BEWARE THE SILENCE AND INGRATIATING SMILES of white and Asian women. They're cultural in origin, not personal. They're about training, not temperament. Sometimes they're genuine. A lot of times, though, they're a front put on to disguise emotions that we either can't or don't know how to express.

The women who have attacked you for your attitudes--the ones you find "hateful" and even "physically repulsive"--those women are your friends. The ones who seem all sweet and submissive are not.]


I (and most men) prefer this moderate/civilized attitude than the generally loud and annoying black women. Especially if they talk to me about the "I'm strong, independant" thing, "black men sucks" etc....

I find them so ugly, and digusting, I don't even look at them, and try to avoid them most of the time. And when I told them that, they call me self-hating black, I reply you're objectively just plain ugly gtfo.

Video : a Black man speaks out ! : Black Women Are Not Submissive & Feminine Enough For BLACK MEN (Starts at 04:00)


[you claim to be a pan-africanst And yet, you hate black women. Methinks I see a problem there.]

I'm honest with myself, maybe it's because I was raised in a predominantly white country, but my sexual attraction goes toward White causasian females. But I still do think that Black/afro-descent people need their own independant country/continent and that interracial countries are a mess. Blacks are not socially welcomed in the western world.


[What you said was, "I'm in favor of equal rights BUT."

You do believe that, at a certain point, women "have to" have babies.

Which is a huge decision, and you think you have the right to make it for them--AND their husbands, too, I might add.

So, you think women should have some rights...but not equal rights, not the right to do whatever they want with their own lives and their own bodies as long as they're not harming other people.

Which makes you the male equivalent of a Jim Crow white person in pre-civil-rights America.

You wouldn't find one person down south, outside of an active Klan member, who believed blacks should not have ANY rights. Heavens, no. They'd be in favor of LOTS of rights for blacks......as long as those rights didn't go "too far." "At a certain point," like, say, being allowed to marry a white person if they choose, they have to go to the back of the bus.

American blacks rejected this wholesale, as they should.

And by the way--THAT is what created the tough, truth-to-power, outspoken black woman whom you so charmingly despise. Not feminism. American feminism tends to be embarrassingly white ]

It's not comparable. women have a natural biological role. Blacks are not "naturally" supposed to sit on the back of the bus, or be hung on a tree.

And sadly feminism is a model for most black women.

HollyDolly #racist stormfront.org

Re: Black female university journalist writes that it's racist for White males to exclusively date White females

Just another black that wants a white man but can't get one so she's playing the race card.....whitey must be racist for not wanting the most disgusting excuse for a human being.

She is the one that is racist for not wanting a black fella or rather even the black fella's don't want her...racist

Black females have like a triple race card they play. They get mad when White men won’t date them. They get mad when Black men pretend to like them and then bang them but then leave immediately and turn them into single mothers. They get mad when Black men date White women. But when a Black woman is somehow able to date a White man, they oooohh and aaahhh over it like it is the most amazing thing on earth, because they know that the best a person can get for themselves is a White. Black women (and men too, but mostly women) were the most hysterical about Meghan Markle marrying Prince Harry. It was all they talked about on Twitter for months. They think that just because we have now broken some kind of magical race barrier because a sheboon married a White prince, that somehow this fantasy can possibly happen for them too. They believe that maybe White men may be more open to dating them now because of Prince Harry. But that was a one time fluke, and Harry most likely has undetected tumors or cysts in his brain that caused a severe lapse in judgement. Either way. They are already having marital problems, even the lying Jew press admits it here and there. I don’t expect them to last more than five years, even though they are now unfortunately having a kid together. Blacks are even saying on Twitter that they hope the kid comes out really dark skinned, just to rub some more crap into the Royal family’s face. They really can’t get over this psychotic love and hate thing they feel for us.

Paul Craig Roberts #fundie paulcraigroberts.org

A Conversation on Race — Paul Craig Roberts

We often hear that we need a conversation on race. Considering that Americans are a brainwashed people living in a false history, such a conversation would resemble the one the Russians were expected to have with the British in regard to the Skripal poisoning: “Yes, we are guilty. We will pay reparations. Where would you like us to send Putin for trial?” In other words, the only acceptable race conversation in the US is one in which white people accept the accusation that they are racist and offer to make amends.

Considering that the only slavery experienced by any living black or white person is income tax slavery, race is an issue only because it has been orchestrated as an issue along with gender and sexual preference. These divisive issues are the products of Identity Politics spawned by cultural Marxism.

In real Marxism, conflict is class conflict. Workers and capitalists have different interests, and history is a struggle between material interests. The capitalist is the villain and the workers are the victims.

In the pseudo Marxism of Identity Politics, the white race is the villain, especially the white heterosexual male, and racial minorities, women, and homosexuals are the victims.

There is, of course, no such thing as a white or black race. There are many different nationalities of whites, and they have done a good job throughout history of killing each other. Similarly, there are many different black tribes and Asian ethnicities who also have fought more among themselves than with others. But all of this goes by the wayside, along with the fact that in the world the “racial minorities” are actually majorities and the “white majority” is actually a minority. There are more Chinese or Indians alone than there are white people.

But orchestrated histories are not fact-based.

The working class, designated by Hillary Clinton as “the Trump deplorables,” is now the victimizer, not the victim. Marxism has been stood on its head.

The American ruling class loves Identity Politics, because Identity Politics divides the people into hostile groups and prevents any resistance to the ruling elite. With blacks screaming at whites, women screaming at men, and homosexuals screaming at heterosexuals, there is no one left to scream at the rulers.

The ruling elite favors a “conversation on race,” because the ruling elite know it can only result in accusations that will further divide society. Consequently, the ruling elite have funded “black history,” “women’s studies,” and “transgender dialogues,” in universities as a way to institutionalize the divisiveness that protects them. These “studies” have replaced real history with fake history.

For example, it was once universally known that black slavery originated in slave wars between black African tribes. Slaves were a status symbol, but they accumulated beyond the capacity of tribes to sustain. The surplus was exported first to Arabs and then to English, Spanish, and French who founded colonies in the new world that had resources but no work force. The socialist scholar Karl Polanyi, brother of my Oxford professor Michael Polanyi, told the story of the origin of the African slave trade in his famous book, Dahomey and the Slave Trade.

The first slaves in the new world were white. When real history was taught, this was widely understood. Movies were even made that showed that in King George III’s England, the alternative to criminal punishment was to be sold as a slave in the colonies. See, for example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oAgfWhlc3gQ

Among the first New World lands to be exploited by the Europeans were the Carribean Islands, which were suitable for sugar and rice production. The problem was that the white slaves died like flies from malaria and yellow fever. The Spanish lack of success with a work force of natives of the lands they conquered led those in search of a work force to the slave export business of the black Kingdom of Dahomey. The demand for black workers rose considerably when it was discovered that many had immunity to malaria and resistance to yellow fever. This meant that a plantation’s investment in a work force was not wiped out by disease.

The resistance of blacks to malaria is due to the protective feature of the sickle cell trait that, apparently, only blacks have. See: https://www.cdc.gov/malaria/about/biology/sickle_cell.html

Slavery existed in the New World long before the United States came into existence. George Washington and Thomas Jefferson are today written off by Identity Politics as racists simply because they were born when slavery was a pre-existing institution.

Slavery had existed for many centuries prior to the Confederacy. Yet, in some accounts today one comes away with the impression that the South invented slavery. As the tale sometimes goes, Southern racists so hated blacks that they went to Africa, captured blacks at great expense, only to return them to the South where they whipped and abused their investments to the point of death and demoralized their work force by breaking up black families, selling children in one direction and wives and husbands in the other. This tale is not told as an occasional abuse but as the general practice. Economically, of course, it makes no sense whatsoever. But facts are no longer part of American history.

Northern states held slaves as well. However, the predominance of slaves were in the South. This was not because Southerners hated blacks. It was because the land in the South supported large agricultural cultivation, and there was no other work force. The South, like the United States, inherited slavery from the work force that European colonists purchased from the black Kingdom of Dahomey.

Why wasn’t there an alternative work force to slaves? The reason is that new immigrants by moving West could take land from the native Americans and be independent as opposed to being wage earners working on someone else’s land. The Western frontier did not close until about 1900. At the time of the War of Northern Aggression the Plains Indians still ruled west of the Mississippi River. It was Lincoln’s Northern war criminals, Sherman and Sheridan, who were sent to exterminate the Plains Indians. Ask the American natives, or what is left of them, who the racists are: the Northerners or the Southerners.

Black studies has even corrupted other aspects of history. Consider the so-called “civil war.” The name itself is an orchestration. There was no civil war. There was a War of Northern Aggression. A civil war is when two sides fight for control of the government. The South had left the union and had no interest whatsoever in controlling the government in Washington. The only reason the South fought was that the South was invaded by the North.

Why did the North invade the South? As was once understood by every historian and every student, Abraham Lincoln invaded the South in order, in Lincoln’s own words, expressed time and time again, “to preserve the Union.”

Why did the South leave the Union? Because it was being economically exploited by the North, which, once the North gained the ability to outvote the Southern states, imposed tariffs that benefited the North at the expense of the South. The North needed protection from British manufactures in order for the economic rise of the North. In contrast, the South’s economy was based on cotton exports to England and on cheap manufactures imported from England. Tariffs would bring the South higher cost of manufactured goods and retaliation against their cotton exports. The economic interests of the North and South did not coincide.

Slavery had nothing whatsoever to do with the war. Lincoln himself said so over and over. Prior to his invasion of the South, Lincoln and the Northern Congress promised the South Constitutional protection of slavery for all time if the Southern states would stay in the Union. Historians who have read and recorded the war correspondence of both Union and Confederacy soldiers to relatives and friends at home can find no one fighting for or against slavery. The Northern troops are fighting to preserve the union. The Southern ones are fighting because they are invaded.

Nothing could be clearer. Yet, the myth has been established that Abraham Lincoln went to war in order to free the slaves. In fact, Lincoln said that blacks were not capable of living with whites, who he said were superior, and that his intention was to send the blacks back to Africa. If America ever had a “white supremacist,” it was Abraham Lincoln.

What about the Emancipation Proclamation? Didn’t this order by Lincoln free the blacks? No. It was a war measure on which hopes were placed that, as almost every able-bodied Southern male was in the front lines, the slaves would revolt and rape the Southern soldiers’ wives and daughters, forcing the soldiers to desert the army and return home to protect their families. As Lincoln’s own Secretary of State said, the president has freed the slaves in the territories that the Union does not control and left them in slavery in the territory that the Union does control.

Why did Lincoln resort to such a dishonorable strategy? The reason is that Lincoln had run through all the Union generals and could not find one that could defeat Robert E. Lee’s vastly outnumbered Army of Northern Virginia.

The character and generalship of Robert E. Lee, who is dismissed by Identity Politics as a white racist, is so highly admired by the United States Army that the Barracks at West Point are named in Lee’s honor. Not even “America’s first black president” was able to change that. Black history also covers up the fact that Robert E. Lee was offered command of the Union Army. In those days Americans still saw themselves as citizens of their state, not as citizens of the US. Lee refused the offer on the grounds that he could not go to war against his native country of Virginia and resigned his US Army commission.

If Lee had been in command of the Confederacy at the First Battle of Bull Run when the Union Army broke and ran all the way back to Washington, Lee would have followed and the war would have ended with the South’s victory.

But Lee wasn’t there. Instead, the Southern generals concluded, watching the fleeing Union Army, that the Northerns could neither fight, retreat in order, or ride horses, and were no threat whatsoever. This conclusion overlooked the superior manpower of the North, the constant inflow of Irish immigrants who became the Union’s cannon fodder, the Northern manufacturing capability, and the navy that could block Southern ports and starve the South of resources.

During the first two years of the War of Northern Aggression the Union Army never won a battle against Lee’s vastly outgunned army. The North had everything. All the South had was valor. Lincoln was desperate. Opposition to his war was rising in the North. He had to imprison 300 Northern newspaper editors, exile a US Congressman, and was faced with the North’s most famous general running against him on a peace platform in the next election. Thus, Lincoln’s vain attempt to provoke a slave rebellion in the South. Why didn’t such allegedly horribly treated and oppressed slaves revolt when there was no one to prevent it but women and children?

Everything I have written in this column was once understood by everyone. But it has all been erased and replaced with a false history that serves the ruling elite. It is not only the ruling elite that has a vested interest in the false history of “white racism,” but also the universities and history departments in which the false history is institutionalized and the foundations that have financed black history, women’s studies, and transgender dialogues.

It was Reconstruction that ruined relations between blacks and whites in the South. The North stuffed blacks down the throats of the defeated South. Blacks were placed in charge of Southern governments in order to protect the Northern carpet baggers who looted and stole from the South. The occupying Union Army encouraged the blacks to abuse the Southern people, especially the women, as did the Union soldiers. The Klu Klux Klan arose as a guerrilla force to stop the predations. Robert E. Lee himself said that if he had realized how rapacious the North would prove to be, he would have led a guerrilla resistance.

The generations of Americans who have been propagandized instead of educated need to understand that Reconstruction did not mean rebuilding southern infrastructure, cities, and towns destroyed by the Union armies. It did not mean reconstructing southern food production. It meant reconstructing southern society and governance. Blacks, who were unprepared for the task, were put in control of governments so that carpetbaggers could loot and steal. Whites lost the franchise and protection of law as their property was stolen. Some areas suffered more than others from the Reconstruction practices, which often differed from, and were worse than, the policies themselves.

Reconstruction was a contentious issue even within the Republican Party. Neither president Lincoln nor Johnson would go along with the more extreme Republican elements. The extremism of the Reconstruction policies lost support among the northern people. When the Democrats regained control of the House of Representatives in the 1870s, Reconstruction was brought to an end.

In the South, and most certainly in Atlanta, where I grew up, schools were neighborhood schools. We were segregated by economic class. I went to school with middle class kids from my middle class neighborhood. I did not go to school with rich kids or with poor kids. This segregation was not racial.

When the North again got on its high moral horse and imposed school integration on the South, it disrupted the neighborhood school system. Now kids spent hours riding in school busses to distant locations. This destroyed the parent-teacher associations that had kept parental involvement and displinine in the schools. The South, being a commonsense people, saw all of this coming. The South also saw Reconstruction all over again. That, and not hatred of blacks, is the reason for the South’s resistance to school integration.

All of America, indeed of the entire West, lives in The Matrix, a concocted reality, except for my readers and the readers of a handful of others who cannot be compromised. Western peoples are so propagandized, so brainwashed, that they have no understanding that their disunity was created in order to make them impotent in the face of a rapacious ruling class, a class whose arrogance and hubris has the world on the brink of nuclear Armageddon.

History as it actually happened is disappearing as those who tell the truth are dismissed as misogynists, racists, homophobes, Putin agents, terrorist sympathizers, anti-semites, and conspiracy theorists. Liberals who complained mightily of McCarthyism now practice it ten-fold.

The brainwashing about the Russian and Muslim threats works for a number of reasons. The superpatriots among the Trump deplorables feel that their patriotism requires them to believe the allegations against Russia, Syria, Iran, and China. Americans employed in the vast military/security complex understand that the budget that funds the complex in which they have their careers is at stake. Those who want a wall to keep out foreigners go along with the demonization of Muslims as terrorists who have to be killed “over there before they come over here.” The Democrats want an excuse for having lost the presidential election. And so on. The agendas of various societal elements come together to support the official propaganda.

The United States with its brainwashed and incompetent population—indeed, the entirety of the Western populations are incompetent—and with its absence of intelligent leadership has no chance against Russia and China, two massive countries arising from their overthrow of police states as the West descends into a gestapo state. The West is over and done with. Nothing remains of the West but the lies used to control the people. All hope is elsewhere.

nfamous21 #racist racerules.wordpress.com

I agree with Matt on everything except the education thing. Education in America is indoctrination. Black people need to be educated separate from white people and other races because American his-story is revisionist and paints all Africans in a negative light. Africans also function cognitively different from whites so we need different methods for learning from whites. Blacks are basically being forced to use the white Prussian method of education and it clearly doesn’t benefit us. There are differences between the races, albeit minor ones, but some are significant enough to warrant policy changes.

I’ll say this and get back to my corporate job since black people will never unite under the onslaught of Jewish control in this country. Black people used to have no choice when it came to unity because we were completely excluded by the white masses by force from earning a decent living. Now we can get degrees, like my parents basically forced me to do and which is further indoctrination, and then sell out to the highest corporate bidder for a cush job.

That is what I did because black people have no unity about anything. That is what most of us do now in one form or another. Even in church the Baptists fight with the Methodists. We won’t start businesses. When we do they last for a few months and fold from our lack of business acumen. Collectively I agree with racist white people that black people are pathetic. All black men want is a PS3, some stripper hoochies with big asses, a BMV or SUV with 24 inch rims, a booming stereo, a big screen TV with 3D, some Dro weed, some designer clothes with Tims, some overpriced jewelry and a glass of Patron.

We’re through and I’m not defending black people anymore. We’ve had plenty of time to wake up from our slumber and what the Jewish elite did to us under the Transatlantic Slave Trade . Now it’s our fault. Our race and our minds has been completely destroyed and we will NEVER get it back before a cataclysmic event happens to America which I believe is coming on next 9/11/2011, ten years from the first 9/11 and at the end of the Hebrew Bible.

anonymous #racist answers.yahoo.com

First off, the only people that get hooked up through interracial dating between blacks and whites, are black men and white women. White men seldom hook up with black women, and the same is true for black women; they rarely hook up with white. It seems like if everyone would kist like their own kind, then everyone would have someone to date. Hooking blacks up with whites is like hooking lions up with cheetahs. The lions would just take over the cheetah's pride because they are bigger cats, then the cheetahs go extinct, and female lions and male cheetahs are without a breeding partner. Thankfully, for the cheetahs this doesn't happen in nature because cheetahs and lions aren't like people;we viilate nature.

Chris Roberts #wingnut #racist amren.com

Can Hispanics, Asians, and White Progressives Launch a Socialist Insurgency in the Western United States?

If not now, soon.

The fight for the Democrat presidential nomination is all but over. Joe Biden’s coalition of blacks, white suburbanites, and old people gave him one crushing victory after another, and — barring an act of God — he will face President Donald Trump in the general election. Senator Bernie Sanders failed to mount much resistance to Mr.. Biden nationally, but the democratic socialist’s successes in the West mean trouble for that region’s centrist Democrats. Mr. Sanders won the California primary and the Nevada caucus because of strong support from Hispanics and Asians in both states, neither of which had enough white moderates or blacks to stop him.

White advocates have long warned that America’s forthcoming non-white majority will end conservatism and destroy the Republican Party, but what is happening is more complex. Within the Democrat Party, a divide is forming along racial lines. There is a moderate wing backed by blacks and certain whites, particularly old people and suburbanites. Then there is a more leftist, or even socialist wing of younger and urban whites and non-black minorities. Mr. Sanders has twice demonstrated that the socialist wing can’t win at the national level — but it can win locally.

Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is a good example. In 2018, with the backing of the Democratic Socialists of America, she launched a primary challenge against Joseph Crowley, a moderate white Democrat, in New York’s 14th Congressional district. Its racial makeup is 11 percent black, 16 percent Asian, 18 percent white, and 50 percent Hispanic. That makes it solidly blue (Hillary Clinton won it in 2016 with 76 percent of the vote), but it also means no black/white alliance backing a moderate can stop a progressive who attracts Hispanics and Asians. Two years ago, Mr. Crowley complained, “I couldn’t help being born white” and lost to Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez by 15 points.

A similar election took place in California. Due to the Republican Party’s weakness and the state’s unusual election laws, in 2018, Senator Dianne Feinstein faced only one opponent in her bid for reelection: fellow Democrat Kevin de León, a progressive Hispanic. Though very few Americans would consider Mrs. Feinstein a “moderate,” her challenger ran to her left, claiming she didn’t oppose President Trump vigorously enough. He lost to her by less than ten points — 54.2 percent to 45.8 percent — and exit polls show that this race was similar to California’s primary:

Incumbents are very hard to beat; they win reelection at least 80 percent of the time. Mr. de León was running against a widely known figure who first won her Senate seat in 1992. You need a lot of money and staff to run against such an entrenched candidate, especially in a state of nearly 40 million people. Furthermore, as the more centrist of the two, Mrs. Feinstein presumably had the support of Republican voters in the general election. Even against all those obstacles, Mr. de León won with Hispanics — his own people and the state’s largest racial group — and lost most dramatically with blacks, the state’s smallest group. He also did better than Mrs. Feinstein’s last three Republican challengers, who won 37.5 percent of the vote in 2012, 35.0 percent in 2006, and 36.6 percent in 2000.

This November, another very prominent “moderate” white California incumbent will be tested against a younger, left-wing, non-white challenger. Nancy Pelosi is defending her seat against Shahid Buttar, a Pakistani democratic socialist. Her district covers most of San Francisco: 6 percent black, 15 percent Hispanic, 33 percent Asian, and 44 percent white. In other words, she has a good chance, but she’ll have to fight to win.

America’s Southwest will see more candidates like Mr. Buttar. Our nation’s rising tide of color is not uniform, and has plenty of internal divisions. That blacks are ending up in political coalitions at odds with Asians and Hispanics is an interesting development. But more important, far-left non-whites are increasingly challenging liberal whites. This should be a warning to those whites that this country is changing, and that no matter how enlightened they think they are, they’ll still be on the losing side in a non-white America.

Figi Moheder #racist youtube.com

As I've said from the beginning of the bullshit, there's nothing wrong with racism or prejudice! The Zionists starting the racism 'outrage' was/is THE PROBLEM!! Having blacks from the ghetto come to white communities in droves because they can't even take it anymore, and white liberals falling for this shit so they can both feel so good about themselves as the original inhabitants' lives, safety, respect, and cultures are taken from them is arrogant and evil as hell! People's personal opinions about ethnicities are nobodies' business, and it's been wrong as fuck to use that against whites or anybody and their, lives, jobs, cultures, safety, happiness, etc. And I'm not against all blacks. I actually (used to) appreciate them a lot. But, this whole forcing them with whites and others to race-mix away our race and theirs', give a different feel to both our former communities, getting blacks to like white music and whites to think they like black culture and music, FORCING blacks to think they like hockey, whites to think they love basketball, all the while blacks are taking both their own people's lives and our lives away from us has caused me and others to be intensely upset at them, the Zionists, and white traitors. They censored racial jokes and tried to train everyone's brains into being against stereotypes that they took away laughter and got us ready to pop on each other. And, the only way it was stifled was the traitorous public going along with the agenda and making fun of whites and having interracial sex like there's no tomorrow?? No, that is DEFINITELY NOT the way to go. Using racism as a witch hunt is fucked. And going after JonTron's every little word, while he's just being himself,to get him filled in as evil by Destiny who is the true fascist evil is dead wrong. I never cared if blacks are racist. I don't care. There was never a problem about it. And to thought crime the last of us sane ones to death (very soon) while the Zionists and their Leftist minions sickeningly take over would've been a joke in a comedy 25+ years ago. But it's the sad reality in a lot of ways!! Wow. Most individuals were racist before this nightmare (and mean fucks, too). And they've patted themselves on the back for falling for all this shit and have changed overnight because they're friends or media told them so. They suck big! I personally knew a jerk who said nigger's hanging we're the good old days. After hearing some recent bit of media bullshit, he suddenly is all about 'all this hate has to stop.' REALLY?! And he was an asshole on top of it. No, you are not good people if you fallen for bs and fascist takeover. Society was not wasting their existence on such bullshit like racism, guys going pee-pee in women's bathrooms, women cutting their hair to look like boys, the birth of asexuals and pansexuals (wtf?). We were much happier not dividing over insane bs as that and were able to just live our lives and follow our dreams. And, no retards, shaming someone into being dupes like you is not right at all. Fuck professional sports, corporations, Zionist-approved music, Zionist entertainment, cable companies, schools -you get the picture. Fucking boycott them and protest them. Yes it's a sin people can't go to a hockey game and see blacks starting to get into the game, or see hockey players all sporting rainbow colored tape on their sticks. It's a sin we can't walk into a chain store without seeing rainbow princesses advertised for your daughter to go out as for Halloween, and all the new black and white couples. You assholes and bitches. It's a nightmare to tune onto Sirius radio and have to hear the evil public ask the announcer if Elvis was racist in 2015. It's an absolute nightmare and Ms. Destiny and ALL those like her need to have their guts sculped in public forever, not us. Look how serious I've become a lot, huh? It's because this unfair, insane thing took off and is only allowed to be empowered. Screw the Leftist fools.

Gedaliah Braun #racist halcyoninitiative.wordpress.com

[Part 3]

Gruesome cruelty

Another aspect of African behavior that liberals do their best to ignore but that nevertheless requires an explanation is gratuitous cruelty. A reviewer of Driving South, a 1993 book by David Robbins, writes:

“A Cape social worker sees elements that revel in violence … It’s like a cult which has embraced a lot of people who otherwise appear normal. … At the slightest provocation their blood-lust is aroused. And then they want to see death, and they jeer and mock at the suffering involved, especially the suffering of a slow and agonizing death.” (Citizen [Johannesburg], July 12, 1993, p.6.)

There is something so unspeakably vile about this, something so beyond depravity, that the human brain recoils. This is not merely the absence of human empathy, but the positive enjoyment of human suffering, all the more so when it is “slow and agonizing.” Can you imagine jeering at and mocking someone in such horrible agony?

During the apartheid era, black activists used to kill traitors and enemies by “necklacing” them. An old tire was put around the victim’s neck, filled with gasoline, and—but it is best to let an eye-witness describe what happened next:

“The petrol-filled tyre is jammed on your shoulders and a lighter is placed within reach . … Your fingers are broken, needles are pushed up your nose and you are tortured until you put the lighter to the petrol yourself.” (Citizen; “SA’s New Nazis,” August 10, 1993, p.18.)

The author of an article in the Chicago Tribune, describing the equally gruesome way the Hutu killed Tutsi in the Burundi massacres, marveled at “the ecstasy of killing, the lust for blood; this is the most horrible thought. It’s beyond my reach.” (“Hutu Killers Danced In Blood Of Victims, Videotapes Show,” Chicago Tribune, September 14, 1995, p.8.) The lack of any moral sense is further evidenced by their having videotaped their crimes, “apparently want[ing] to record … [them] for posterity.” Unlike war criminals, who hid their deeds, these people apparently took pride in their work.

In 1993, Amy Biehl, a 26-year-old American on a Fulbright scholarship, was living in South Africa, where she spent most of her time in black townships helping blacks. One day when she was driving three African friends home, young blacks stopped the car, dragged her out, and killed her because she was white. A retired senior South African judge, Rex van Schalkwyk, in his 1998 book One Miracle is Not Enough, quotes from a newspaper report on the trial of her killers: “Supporters of the three men accused of murdering [her] … burst out laughing in the public gallery of the Supreme Court today when a witness told how the battered woman groaned in pain.” This behavior, Van Schalkwyk wrote, “is impossible to explain in terms accessible to rational minds.” (pp. 188-89.)

These incidents and the responses they evoke—“the human brain recoils,” “beyond my reach,” “impossible to explain to rational minds” — represent a pattern of behavior and thinking that cannot be wished away, and offer additional support for my claim that Africans are deficient in moral consciousness.

I have long suspected that the idea of rape is not the same in Africa as elsewhere, and now I find confirmation of this in Newsweek:

“According to a three-year study [in Johannesburg] … more than half of the young people interviewed — both male and female — believe that forcing sex with someone you know does not constitute sexual violence … [T]he casual manner in which South African teens discuss coercive relationships and unprotected sex is staggering.” (Tom Masland, “Breaking The Silence,” Newsweek, July 9, 2000.)

Clearly, many blacks do not think rape is anything to be ashamed of.

The Newsweek author is puzzled by widespread behavior that is known to lead to AIDS, asking “Why has the safe-sex effort failed so abjectly?” Well, aside from their profoundly different attitudes towards sex and violence and their heightened libido, a major factor could be their diminished concept of time and reduced ability to think ahead.

Nevertheless, I was still surprised by what I found in the Zulu dictionary. The main entry for rape reads: “1. Act hurriedly; … 2. Be greedy. 3. Rob, plunder, … take [possessions] by force.” While these entries may be related to our concept of rape, there is one small problem: there is no reference to sexual intercourse! In a male-dominated culture, where saying “no” is often not an option (as confirmed by the study just mentioned), “taking sex by force” is not really part of the African mental calculus. Rape clearly has a moral dimension, but perhaps not to Africans. To the extent they do not consider coerced sex to be wrong, then, by our conception, they cannot consider it rape because rape is wrong. If such behavior isn’t wrong it isn’t rape.

An article about gang rape in the left-wing British paper, the Guardian, confirms this when it quotes a young black woman: “The thing is, they [black men] don’t see it as rape, as us being forced. They just see it as pleasure for them.” (Rose George, “They Don’t See it as Rape. They Just See it as Pleasure for Them,” June 5, 2004.) A similar attitude seems to be shared among some American blacks who casually refer to gang rape as “running a train.” (Nathan McCall, Makes Me Wanna Holler, Vintage Books, 1995.)

If the African understanding of rape is far afield, so may be their idea of romance or love. I recently watched a South African television program about having sex for money. Of the several women in the audience who spoke up, not a single one questioned the morality of this behavior. Indeed, one plaintively asked, “Why else would I have sex with a man?”

From the casual way in which Africans throw around the word “love,” I suspect their understanding of it is, at best, childish. I suspect the notion is alien to Africans, and I would be surprised if things are very different among American blacks. Africans hear whites speak of “love” and try to give it a meaning from within their own conceptual repertoire. The result is a child’s conception of this deepest of human emotions, probably similar to their misunderstanding of the nature of a promise.

I recently located a document that was dictated to me by a young African woman in June 1993. She called it her “story,” and the final paragraph is a poignant illustration of what to Europeans would seem to be a limited understanding of love:

“On my way from school, I met a boy. And he proposed me. His name was Mokone. He tell me that he love me. And then I tell him I will give him his answer next week. At night I was crazy about him. I was always thinking about him.”

Moral blindness

Whenever I taught ethics I used the example of Alfred Dreyfus, a Jewish officer in the French Army who was convicted of treason in 1894 even though the authorities knew he was innocent. Admitting their mistake, it was said, would have a disastrous effect on military morale and would cause great social unrest. I would in turn argue that certain things are intrinsically wrong and not just because of their consequences. Even if the results of freeing Dreyfus would be much worse than keeping him in prison, he must be freed, because it is unjust to keep an innocent man in prison.

To my amazement, an entire class in Kenya said without hesitation that he should not be freed. Call me dense if you want, but it was 20 years before the full significance of this began to dawn on me.

Africans, I believe, may generally lack the concepts of subjunctivity and counterfactuality. Subjunctivity is conveyed in such statements as, “What would you have done if I hadn’t showed up?” This is contrary to fact because I did show up, and it is now impossible for me not to have shown up. We are asking someone to imagine what he would have done if something that didn’t happen (and now couldn’t happen) had happened. This requires self-consciousness, and I have already described blacks’ possible deficiency in this respect. It is obvious that animals, for example, cannot think counterfactually, because of their complete lack of self-awareness.

When someone I know tried to persuade his African workers to contribute to a health insurance policy, they asked “What’s it for?” “Well, if you have an accident, it would pay for the hospital.” Their response was immediate: “But boss, we didn’t have an accident!” “Yes, but what if you did?” Reply? “We didn’t have an accident!” End of story.

Interestingly, blacks do plan for funerals, for although an accident is only a risk, death is a certainty. (The Zulu entries for “risk” are “danger” and “a slippery surface.”) Given the frequent all-or-nothing nature of black thinking, if it’s not certain you will have an accident, then you will not have an accident. Furthermore, death is concrete and observable: We see people grow old and die. Africans tend to be aware of time when it is manifested in the concrete and observable.

One of the pivotal ideas underpinning morality is the Golden Rule: do unto others as you would have them do unto you. “How would you feel if someone stole everything you owned? Well, that’s how he would feel if you robbed him.” The subjunctivity here is obvious. But if Africans may generally lack this concept, they will have difficulty in understanding the Golden Rule and, to that extent, in understanding morality.

If this is true we might also expect their capacity for human empathy to be diminished, and this is suggested in the examples cited above. After all, how do we empathize? When we hear about things like “necklacing” we instinctively — and unconsciously — think: “How would I feel if I were that person?” Of course I am not and cannot be that person, but to imagine being that person gives us valuable moral “information:” that we wouldn’t want this to happen to us and so we shouldn’t want it to happen to others. To the extent people are deficient in such abstract thinking, they will be deficient in moral understanding and hence in human empathy—which is what we tend to find in Africans.

In his 1990 book Devil’s Night, Ze’ev Chafets quotes a black woman speaking about the problems of Detroit: “I know some people won’t like this, but whenever you get a whole lot of black people, you’re gonna have problems. Blacks are ignorant and rude.” (pp. 76-77.)

If some Africans cannot clearly imagine what their own rude behavior feels like to others—in other words, if they cannot put themselves in the other person’s shoes—they will be incapable of understanding what rudeness is. For them, what we call rude may be normal and therefore, from their perspective, not really rude. Africans may therefore not be offended by behavior we would consider rude — not keeping appointments, for example. One might even conjecture that African cruelty is not the same as white cruelty, since Africans may not be fully aware of the nature of their behavior, whereas such awareness is an essential part of “real” cruelty.

I am hardly the only one to notice this obliviousness to others that sometimes characterizes black behavior. Walt Harrington, a white liberal married to a light-skinned black, makes some surprising admissions in his 1994 book, Crossings: A White Man’s Journey Into Black America:

“I notice a small car … in the distance. Suddenly … a bag of garbage flies out its window . … I think, I’ll bet they’re blacks. Over the years I’ve noticed more blacks littering than whites. I hate to admit this because it is a prejudice. But as I pass the car, I see that my reflex was correct—[they are blacks].

“[As I pull] into a McDonald’s drive-through … [I see that] the car in front of me had four black in it. Again … my mind made its unconscious calculation: We’ll be sitting here forever while these people decide what to order. I literally shook my head . … My God, my kids are half black! But then the kicker: we waited and waited and waited. Each of the four … leaned out the window and ordered individually. The order was changed several times. We sat and sat, and I again shook my head, this time at the conundrum that is race in America.

“I knew that the buried sentiment that had made me predict this disorganization … was … racist. … But my prediction was right.” (pp. 234-35.)

Africans also tend to litter. To understand this we must ask why whites don’t litter, at least not as much. We ask ourselves: “What would happen if everyone threw rubbish everywhere? It would be a mess. So you shouldn’t do it!” Blacks’ possible deficiency in abstract thinking makes such reasoning more difficult, so any behavior requiring such thinking is less likely to develop in their cultures. Even after living for generations in societies where such thinking is commonplace, many may still fail to absorb it.

It should go without saying that my observations about Africans are generalizations. I am not saying that none has the capacity for abstract thought or moral understanding. I am speaking of tendencies and averages, which leave room for many exceptions.

To what extent do my observations about Africans apply to American blacks? American blacks have an average IQ of 85, which is a full 15 points higher than the African average of 70. The capacity for abstract thought is unquestionably correlated with intelligence, and so we can expect American blacks generally to exceed Africans in these respects.

Still, American blacks show many of the traits so striking among Africans: low mathematical ability, diminished abstract reasoning, high crime rates, a short time-horizon, rudeness, littering, etc. If I had lived only among American blacks and not among Africans, I might never have reached the conclusions I have, but the more extreme behavior among Africans makes it easier to perceive the same tendencies among American blacks.

The Mad Jewess #racist themadjewess.net

Kareem Abdul Jabbar is brain damaged and totally oblivious to the racial crimes perpetrated against white people by his brothers or he knows about it and wants to keep it secret.

In the above TIME mag post, Jabbar rants about the 1970’s and what happened at Kent State when the Communists ‘protested’ (violently, by the way.) Nothing about the behavior of his black brothers in Ferguson or present day America. Liberal “Progressives” talk about nothing but the past. Jabbar offers no rebuke to violent, destructive and murderous behavior of black males. Instead, he twists the situation around, focusing his rhetoric on the Communist cause which is what we can expect from a Liberal Black.

Not only do the black, liberal males want to loot and riot, they want to take whatever ‘evil’ whitey, (include Asians and Jews) worked for and give it to themselves. That’s the facts.

Jabbar does not bother to expose the black on white crime, which is an everyday issue within the suburbs of white America: See all of the black-on-white crimes for yourself. Exposing these crimes would heal the country. Covering them up adds to the demise, which the Liberal “Progressives” want. Mr. Larry Elder is respected because he brings healing. He exposes bad, black behavior and I am sure that many white people who have been affected in their lives are eternally grateful to Mr. Elders.

The issue: There has been a race war going on since late 70’s, early 80’s. The left wing MEDIA and their co-conspirators, the GOP Main stream – have hidden this problem for decades. Wars are not always big tanks and guns. Whites have been murdered, beaten, raped and robbed by black males for many years. So, Kareem is not helping anything. If possible, he is adding more tension to the on going race war in USSA because he lies & covers up, just like Obama.

Ayo Kimathi #racist waronthehorizon.com

[Note: This individual actually works for the Department of Homeland Security.]

Black Ethnic Cleansing: An Idea Whose Time Has Come

The Black Race has made many mistakes throughout the course of history – the greatest mistakes involving our interactions with white folks. We have allowed them to integrate into our societies and destroy almost every powerful Afrikan empire in history. Even today, we foolishly trust this sadistic race of devils who only seek to exterminate us from this planet. In our passionate love for the white race (our historical archenemy) we are desperately naïve and suicidal. We love the very race that murders our babies, destroys our culture, and commits countless acts of genocide against our people worldwide.

The mistakes and poor decisions regarding integrating with whites are numerous and obvious to the informed, intellectually courageous Afrikan who respects and acknowledges truth. Integration with whites has literally enslaved and/or killed Afrikan people in every corner of this planet where we exist. As a result of this reality and mounting white racial military momentum, a Black vs. white Race War is inevitable. The 21st century will either mark the return of Black resistance to white domination or global white-on-Black genocide leading to our complete extinction. Warfare is eminent, and in order for Black people to survive the 21st century, we are going to have to kill a lot of whites – more than our christian hearts can possibly count.

This harsh reality is becoming more apparent to Black people with continuing white racial acts of aggression like the Bush/Brown Massacre of 2005 (aka “Hurricane Katrina) and the current bombing and siege of Haiti. The sophisticated members of our Race are beginning to realize that Black Racial death is looming over our heads and that violence and war are necessary to protect global Black interests. And though this is a hard pill to swallow, our people are beginning to wake up and accept our rendezvous with destiny.

Waging war against whites is at the core of the Afrikan warrior’s spirit. It’s the flame that drives our willingness to fight in the face of certain defeat and/or death. But there is another reality that is more difficult for the committed Black progressive community to accept. The one thing we dread more than brutal warfare with the white race is the spilling of Black blood. We don’t want to harm our own people. We understand that our people are victims of centuries of abuse and torture, and we want to help them. Our hatred for white life is many times only surpassed by our love for our own people.

This would be beautiful if it resulted in the unification of Black people under the umbrella of Black love, self-respect, self-defense and decency. However, the reality is the very opposite. Because whites have produced an almost endless supply of black-skinned Uncle Tom race traitors, the Afrikan Nationalists’ love for Black people has become the very lifeline for Black racial treason.

[...]

We should have expected the smallhats (white so-called “jews”) and the white homos like Gay Edgar Hoover to fight against the rising tide of Black empowerment spearheaded by Marcus Garvey and his UNIA. However, it was the Uncle Tom Negroes that made it clear to the white establishment that Garvey was a threat to the system of white supremacy. It was W.E.B. Dubois and his cronies who called the U.N.I.A. (Universal Negro Improvement Association) the Ugliest Ni**ers in amerikkka because the organization was made up of mostly poor, brown to dark-skinned brothers and sisters. The UNIA did not discriminate based on the complexion of one’s skin; however, the smallhat run and operated NAACP did. So these jealous, high-yellow mentality having Uncle Toms who desired a caste system of preference based on their lighter skin, galvanized their forces and started the “Garvey Must Go Movement.” Started by A. Phillip Randolph (Uncle Tom Negro and mentor to the white-sex offender and Uncle Tom Bayard Rustin), this Uncle Tom inspired movement led to the imprisonment and deportation of Garvey. Dubois, William Monroe Trotter, and other shuffling Toms destroyed the largest Black self-help organization in the history of the world.

[...]

As a result of our constant tolerance for Negro treason in the face of mounting white racial aggression, we are living in a cesspool of race treason with koons like:

Clarence Thomas, Jesse Lee Peterson, Condoleezza Rice, Colon Powell, Joseph Mobutu, Naim Akbar, Al Sharpton, Ken Hamblin, Henry Louis Gates, Ward Connerly, Oprah Winfrey, Whoopi Goldberg, Halle Berry, The Wayans Family, Tyler Perry, Keith Boykin, Morgan Freeman, Monique, Tyra Banks, All Rappers, All Political Homos, All Promoters and Supporters of Interracial dating/marriage/sex, etc . . .

ReichMarschall #racist stormfront.org

Re: Judge rejects Ontario man’s ‘racist will’ that disinherited daughter for having ‘bastard white son’

I love it. Let em keep screaming:
"Dats RAAAAAAAYYYCCCCIIIISSSSSSS!!!" And
"He dindu nuffins!!!"
"He wuz a good boy, he'z nevar hurt kno bawdyy!"
"He wuz gunna be the next obammy!!!"
"He wuz clearly a victimz of YT and hiz privladge!"

and let that nig rag "Salon" keep telling everyone that blacks need to start killing more whites wholesale and have more liberal commie "white" jew dike apologists write more articles about how we need to apologize for our so called "white privilege" and we need to let the negro get away with whatever he wants to including raping our women and children, stealing, looting, beatings, and murder against innocent white people for the sole reason of being white so he, being the Negri, deserves this.

You know what. Yeah white privilege does exist. You know why?

WE FU*KING EARNED THAT RIGHT! WE WORKED OUT ASSES OFF FOR THOUSANDS OF YEARS FOR THE BETTERMENT OF THE EARTH AND WE HAVE EARNED THE RIGHT TO HAVE CERTAIN PRIVILEGES. THE NEGRI HAVEN'T EARNED THIS. THEY HAVEN'T EARNED THE RIGHT TO BE ANYTHING OTHER THAN THE FAECES SCRAPED OFF OUR SHOES.

White America is getting very sick and tired of this negro whinery and crybabery, rioting and murdering it's causing lots and lots of whites i know who were fence sitters to come over finally, FINALLY!

So let them keep at it because it needs to get worse before it gets better for us whites.

The Negri are just digging their own graves.

Just like the jew who keeps screaming "anti-semite" over and over and over and over again every time it doesn't get its greedy little way or when someone stands up to the little sh*ts.

So let em over use those phrases because just like antibiotics over used, they will eventually stop working and there will be a massive back lash and onslaught in these two parasites of humanity!

It's only a matter of time!

Sieg Heil, mein volk! We will crush the vermin!

Capt. Rosslyn V. Crasto #fundie christiannews.net

The TWO WITNESS-PROPHETS Of The APOCALYPSE
============================================
of St. John the Apostle-Evangelist-Visionary, commonly known as THE BOOK OF REVELATION Of The Holy Bible.

The FIRST WITNESS-PROPHET
==========================

The FIRST WITNESS-PROPHET of the APOCALYPSE
===========================================
is, was, & always will be, St. John the Apostle-Evangelist-Visionary of the Apocalypse, Author of the Book Of Revelation of the Holy Bible; Dearly Beloved and Staunchest of all the 12 Apostles of Our Beloved and Blessed Lord and Saviour JESUS CHRIST, who stood by the foot of His Holy Cross right until the end.

Ref. Rev. 10.11 “And he {the Angel of Revelation} said to me {St. John}: “Thou must prophesy again to many nations, and peoples, and tongues, and kings”. Amen.

The SECOND of the TWO WITNESSES, whosoever he be, will join him in Heaven for the first 1260 Days of the Apocalypse.

After that, they will both be landed at Old Jerusalem for their Martyrdom.

And now I have solved the mystery of why St. John alone, of all the 12 Apostles, was not martyred in the first instance !!!

And best of all news for me personally, the day I first wrote this Post I became a Chess “Grand-Master a la Revelation”.

I say this because the Divine Inspiration to write this Post came to me via. my own newly-discovered Chess Game, which I call: “The Sicilian Double-Bishop Opening with O-O-O {Queen-side Castling}.

See my “CHESS a la REVELATION” on my FACEBOOK Timeline, which I also reproduce here, much further below, for your convenience:

Do you Notice that, after O-O-O, both the WHITE BISHOPS are close to the King and never leave His side right unto the end of the Game ???!!!

INVITATION To THE WORLD:
=======================

INVITATION To THE WORLD, Dated 07th December 2015 C.E.:
=================================================

with: “CHESS a la REVELATION”, &:
============================
On my FACEBOOK {Public} Timeline which you can access simply by using my name: “CaptRosslyn Crasto” as the FACEBOOK Search Engine:

Pics. of our Galaxy: The Milky Way, & The Pillars Of Creation of Eagle Nebula:
=============================================================

Dear All, my Dear Brothers & Sisters IN THE LORD JESUS CHRIST, Our Beloved and Blessed Lord and Saviour, if Selected by God Almighty: YAHWEH to do so, I offer you my hand in Virtual Friendship with you IN CHRIST.

Walk Virtually with me, for the greatest experience of your life.

By that I mean, just simply observe, on your own Computer, wheresoever U are, the Biblical History of the Book Of Revelation being made, before U plunge deeper into disbelief or indifference.

All in all U all seem to be good people, so why throw it all away when all U have to do is to keep an open mind about what I say on the World-Wide INTERNET ???

I don’t give U mysticism like the Horned Lamb of Rev. 13.11, the two FALSE POPES of the Once-Holy Roman Catholic Church.

I give U Science, ADVANCED SCIENCE, Time Dilation, SpaceTime Warp, SpaceTime Continuae, Parsec-Shift Operations & God knows what else that God Himself inspires me with, to describe His Own Unique Creation, as promised by Him in the Book Of Revelation of the Holy Bible, ref. Rev. 10.7:

Rev. 10.7: “But in the days of the voice of the seventh angel, when he shall begin to sound the trumpet, THE MYSTERY OF GOD SHALL BE FINISHED, as he hath declared by his servants the prophets”.

Just sit back, munch your Popcorn, & enjoy the show.

Accolades or Acrimony, later.

Thank you & God Bless.

Best Regards,
Capt. Rosslyn Valentine Crasto.

R.S.V.P.

with: “CHESS a la REVELATION”:
=========================

Dear All, my Dear Brothers & Sisters IN THE LORD JESUS CHRIST, Our Beloved and Blessed Lord and Saviour, I offer you my hand in Virtual Friendship with you IN CHRIST.

Walk Virtually with me, for the greatest experience of your life.

By that I mean, just simply observe, on your own Computer, wheresoever U are, the Biblical History of the Book Of Revelation being made, before U plunge deeper into disbelief or indifference.

All in all U all seem to be good people, so why throw it all away when all U have to do is to keep an open mind about what I say on the World-Wide INTERNET ???

I don’t give U mysticism like the Horned Lamb of Rev. 13.11, the two FALSE POPES of the Once-Holy Roman Catholic Church.

I give U Science, ADVANCED SCIENCE, Time Dilation, SpaceTime Warp, SpaceTime Continuae, Parsec Operations & God knows what else that God Himself inspires me with, to describe His Own Unique Creation, as promised by Him in the Book Of Revelation of the Holy Bible, ref. Rev. 10.7:

Rev. 10.7: But in the days of the voice of the seventh angel, when he shall begin to sound the trumpet, THE MYSTERY OF GOD SHALL BE FINISHED, as he hath declared by his servants the prophets.

Just sit back, munch your Popcorn, & enjoy the show.

Accolades or Acrimony, later.

Thank you & God Bless.

B.Rgds.,
Capt. Rosslyn Valentine Crasto.

R.S.V.P.

CHESS a la REVELATION:
====================

The CHESS Game: “CHESS a la REVELATION”:

CHESS
======
The Sicilian Double-Bishop Opening with O-O-O:
======================================
Discovered By Capt. Rosslyn V. Crasto, under Inspiration from God.

This Game has been developed by me over a period of trial & error, playing as WHITE on my P.C. against a Computer Program made by XL Jean-Marie Barone.

It achieved Victory with CHECKMATE in 32 Moves, & also worked with minor Variations.

However, playing as BLACK, it was difficult to use the same strategy, because WHITE was constantly diverting attention from it’s development. I am still working on perfecting it, playing as BLACK.

Here are the moves:

WHITE; BLACK:

1.) PC2 => C3; NB8 => C6
2.) PE2 => E3; NG8 => F6
3.) BF1 => D3; NC6 => E5
4.) BD3 => C2; NF6 => D5
5.) PB2 => B3; PE7 => E6
6.) BC1 => B2; QD8 => F6
7.) QD1 => E2; BF8 => C5
8.) PD2 => D4; BC5 => PD4
9.) PC3 => BD4; NE5 => C6
10.) PA2 => A3; O-O
11.) NB1 => C3; ND5 => NC3
12.) BB2 => NC3; PD7 => D5
13.) BC3 => B2; BC8 => D7
14.) O-O-O; RF8 => E8
15.) KC1 => B1; RA8 => D8
16.) PF2 => F4; RD8 => A8
17.) NG1 => F3; RA8 => D8
18.) RD1 => G1; RD8 => A8
19.) PG2 => G4; RA8 => D8
20.) PH2 => H4; RD8 => A8
21.) PG4 => G5; QF6 => E7
22.) PH4 => H5; QE7 => D6
23.) RH1 => H2; RA8 => D8
24.) RG1 => H1; RD8 => A8
25.) BB2 => C1; RA8 => D8
26.) NF3 => H4; RD8 => A8
27.) QE2 => D3; PG7 => G6
28.) PH5 => PG6; PH7 => PG6
29.) NH4 => PG6; PF7 => NG6
30.) QD3 => PG6; KG8 => F8
31.) QG6 => F6; KF8 => G8
32.) RH2 => H8; Checkmate !!!

Application to the Book Of Revelation:
===========================

Now Use the Counter-Parts below, to “Decode” the Game above.
Perhaps we may find some astonishing Truths within them, showing us the Moves as REVELATION unfolds shortly, but with GOD always playing as WHITE, The Game Opener:

The Multi-Dimensional CHESSBOARD of REVELATION:
===========================================

Is the Book Of Revelation of the Holy Bible, the Ultimate Game of Chess ???
Chess played by God against Satan ???

GOD ALMIGHTY: Always as WHITE, the Game Opener:
———————————————————————

1.) King = God Almighty;
2.) Queen = Our Beloved and Blessed Virgin Mother Mary;
3.) Bishops = The two Witness-Prophets of Rev. Chapter 11, St. John the Apostle-Evangelist-Visionary Of Revelation & the Second Witness to be selected by God Almighty from among the living of the Earth;
4.) Knights = St. George the Dragon-Slayer & St. Joan Of Arc, Patron Saint of France;
5.) Rooks = Archangels: St. Michael & St. Abaddon / Apollyon / Exterminans of Rev. 9.11: “A king, the angel of the bottomless pit; whose name in Hebrew is Abaddon, and in Greek Apollyon; in Latin Exterminans”; and…….
6.) Pawns = Two-Thirds of the Angels + One Third of Mankind;

SATANAEL / SATANIEL: Always as BLACK:
—————————————————–

1.) King = Satan, Leading Head of the Biblical Beast of Rev. Chapter 13, whose symbol is an Angry Bull;
2.) Queen = Arch-Demoness Succubus LILITH, {Al-Lilat in the Unholy Qu’ran}, half-female human and half-goat, the BURAQ of Islam, whose symbol is a Screeching Owl;
3.) Bishops = The current two Popes as per Rev. 13.11: “And I saw another beast coming up out of the earth, and he had two horns, like a lamb, and he spoke as a dragon”.
4.) Knights = Arch-Demons Asmodeus and Ahriman;
5.) Rooks = False Prophet of Rev. 16.13, Rev. 19.20 and Rev. 20.10 who is the present Caliph of Daesh / ISIS / ISIL / IS, and the Leading Head of the Biblical Dragon of Rev. Chapter 12, POTUS; and……
6.) Pawns = One-Third of the Angels + Two-Thirds of Mankind ???!!!

Then let’s have your Opinions, Please.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Notes on the Current Status of the Real World w.r.t. REVELATION:
================================================
1.) The WHITE Bishop, {the SECOND WITNESS-PROPHET of Rev. Chapter 11, the FIRST WITNESS-PROPHET being St. John the Apostle-Evangelist-Visionary of REVELATION}: In WHITE’s very first two moves, which are 2 different pawn moves, 2 doors / portals / terminal points open, first the one in Heaven {on White’s Queen-side}, & in the next pawn move, a door on Earth {King-side} similarly opens. Then the 2nd White Bishop moves into Space with a brief stop-over at approx. mid-point, to be prepared Spiritually & Physically, to Enter into the Kingdom Of Heaven.

When the first Door opens in the Super-Spaceship called “Heaven”, Rev. 11.19 will come into effect.

Rev. 11:19 “And the temple of God was opened in heaven: and the ark of his testament was seen in his temple, and there were lightnings, and voices, and an earthquake, and great hail”.

A Global Earthquake & Great Hail all over the Planet, as the Super-Spaceship called Heaven enters or nears our Gravitational Force Field, with a Tesla Effect on the weather ???

Current Status: Awaiting / Accomplished / Proven Erroneous;
CURRENT STATUS: Awaiting.

2.) The BLACK Bishop, {One of the Two False Popes that we presently have, I guess it will be Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI, in the next few Opening Moves, is challenged by a White Pawn, to whom he succumbs / retires from the Game after having submitted his “New Doctrine & Dogma” substituting: ALLAH as YAHWEH, GOD THE FATHER, in all our Prayers etc. !!!
And, later on, via. the BIBLICAL BEAST OF WORLD FINANCE, Pope Francis I will issue: 666, The Mark & No. of the Beast of Rev. Chapters 13 & 14 etc. Very Bad Times ahead for all the present Roman Catholic Church, Clergy & Faithful, until they join the TWO TRUE CHURCHES, the only True Church/es being set up for the Apocalypse by St. John the Apostle-Evangelist-Visionary Of Revelation, himself.

Current Status: Awaiting / Accomplished / Proven Erroneous;
CURRENT STATUS: Awaiting.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Thank You for your time,
All The Best,
& God Bless.
Sukhi Rahe {“Be Happy” in Hindi},
Shalom & Amen.

Best Regards,
Capt. Rosslyn Valentine Crasto,
{Valid} Indian Passport No.: G 2623652.

diggerfortruth #conspiracy #racism diggerfortruth.wordpress.com

It wasn’t too long ago that I too believed some of these misconceptions. Sooner or later the Truth and reality catches up with all of us.


1/. White European nations became rich off of the backs of the slave trade and plundering other nations
This is inaccurate. It was always the jews and the gentry directly serving the jews who benefited from the slave trade. After all it was mainly blacks enslaving blacks in Africa. The jews just capitalised on this industry. The actual lower classes never benefited from slavery, because they were slaves themselves; and still are.

And to argue that even the lower classes indirectly benefited due to the infrastructure, this too is not accurate. The European mind and energy has always had the ability to produce, create and invent at an incredible capacity. The railroads, hospitals, theatres, educational institutes were all physically produced by the working class on meagre wages. Any financial gains obtained by jewish families were spent internally to help international jewry; certainly not philanthropically distributed amongst society for the benefit of European peoples. The trickle down effect is another myth. We built and financed everything ourselves, through our hard work, ingenuity and creativity. That is the reality.

The myth that European nations are rich because we pilfered and enslaved others is nonsense – just more jewish mind control to guilt Europeans into accepting their white genocide.


2/. White Europeans invaded African culture, enslaved the blacks and had a cruel apartheid system
First the white Europeans who were fleeing jewish enslavement settled in a barren uninhabited South Africa. There was nothing much there other than nature’s elements – rocks and bushes. The hard working, ingenious, mixed Europeans literately created a superpower out of the bushes. Then when they had built a civilised structure – the blacks came to them. They did not build up their culture off the backs of the blacks.

As for the apartheid – what else could they do? It was the most sensible thing to do, to keep the blacks from rampaging their culture. Just look what is happening to the Afrikaners now that the apartheid has been abolished. The apartheid was essentially a border control that’s all.

The myth that the white South Africans used the blacks to create their lifestyle is ridiculous propaganda – just more jewish mind control to guilt Europeans into accepting their white genocide.
[please listen to Karen Smith’s interview below]
t
t
3/. Being racist is the most anti-social thing one can be
Well first of all this word racist was coined by a mass murdering jew called Trotsky. This was created in order to guilt up any Whites who dare to stand up for their European culture. It is a powerful word and meme and this single word alone enables vast amounts of white people to bend over backwards to accommodate non-whites into their culture, just in order not be labeled a racist. Whites will give up their heritage, jobs, culture, lineage, identity and lifestyle so long as they are not called this silly little name. It is truly incredible the power of trigger words through mind control – just more jewish mind control to guilt Europeans into accepting their white genocide.
t
t
4/. Diversity enriches European societies
On the surface, one could argue that having multiple choices of restaurants from many different cultures is a positive thing for society. One could indeed say that these cultures are contributing to European culture by providing alternatives. But at what price? How much of a payoff do we have for this enrichment? It is obvious by now to anyone who is prepared to use an ounce of logic that behind the surface of this colourful enrichment; the indigenous European peoples are paying a hefty price. In fact we are suffocating. Multiculturalism is the death spell of European culture and civilisation. Had Europeans just had a policy that only small amounts of people can stay providing they provide a unique contribution: a Chinese martial art, a Korean healing system, an Indian meditation technique, etc; then this really would be enrichment. The reality is most people coming to Europe have only one interest – to serve themselves. None of them give a damn about the preservation of our European culture. Every single migrant cares only about their self interests and their culture. None of them actively help to preserve European culture. Diversity = white genocide. Diversity is enrichment – just more jewish mind control to guilt Europeans into accepting their white genocide.
t
t
5/. Colour is just skin deep – we’re all equal
This is simply not true! One only has to objectively look at each race and look at each races’ achievements. One can use all the excuses in the world as to why certain cultures have not been able to develop; but we all have been on this planet for the same time. It’s too much of a coincidence that in every single part of the globe that White European cultures have lived – civilised cultures have blossomed. Europeans built the pyramids. It is only because of jewish interference that white Europeans have not been able to fully develop. Just look what Germany achieved in just six years free of the parasitic jews. The same for England after Edward the 1st (Longshanks) booted the jews out of England ….look how England prospered. It’s been the same in every European culture, if Europeans are left to flourish on their own without the parasitic jew. The ‘we’re all equal’ narrative is just more jewish mind control to guilt Europeans into accepting their white genocide.
t
t
6/. The only reason a high percentage of blacks are violent is because they have been socially suppressed by whites and all they are doing is venting their righteous anger – it’s justified
Righteous anger – about what exactly? Having been afforded 100 fold opportunities in a European culture than in their own culture? Just look at the opportunities they have been given. Companies and local councils are bending over backwards with ‘affirmative action’/equal opportunities for non-whites. In fact it is easier now for a non-white to get a job in a Government/local council job. Not to mention the handouts. And how can the unprovoked attacks on whites be explained in South Africa? These were not oppressed people’s, they were outsiders coming in to destroy White civilisation. The notion that all blacks (as a collective) need is education and they will blend into any civilised European society has now been proven a myth. How far do we have to stretch things to continually come up with excuses for black on white crimes – just more jewish mind control to guilt Europeans into accepting their white genocide. [please see video channel below]
t
t
7/. White people and white cultures are innately racist
What could be further than the Truth. White people (as a collective) are THE least racist people on the planet. And I struggle with this term racist anyway; as it is another trigger word created by the jews. But as far as being accommodating – there is no race on the planet more accommodating than the white European race. We have given and given and given and given throughout our whole existence. And we continue to give in endless charitable and philanthropic projects. Yet somehow as the providers, we always seem to end up with the racist label and the ones feeling guilty for not having done enough and somehow being the suppressors of non-whites. Had it not been for the white peoples’ inventiveness, with sanitation, electricity, medical resources, etc; the population of non-whites would be far less. Whites are evil racists – just more jewish mind control to guilt Europeans into accepting their white genocide.
t
t
8/. All races can pull together to fight the common evil
At one point I truly did believe this nonsense. I really did think that if all races and cultures woke up to the JCN, then we’ld live a more peaceful existence – ha. Oh dear, how embarrassing. The concept that if we all pull together to fight our common foe, we would live in peace. Utter nonsense. Just look at each race and how they only look after themselves. You can see it within the Truth movement – the blacks are all about their black issues, the Muslims are only pro-Islam, even the gays only care about their gay issues. None of these secular groups want to join forces to fight the jewish agenda, because secretly they know who is funding their particular agenda. They’re all ultimately about bringing down the European race.
t
t
9/. Just like mongrel dogs, mixed race people are healthier and less susceptible to inbred diseases
And there are people out there who propagate this garbage. As with all these modern memes, it couldn’t be further from the Truth and as always just more inverted Truth. The healthiest of races are the purest of races. This is a given. Mixed race children apparently are not able to receive organ donations. Why all of a sudden would genetics suddenly change in cultures? If races have bred amongst their own for thousands of years; why now is this seemed unhealthy? A jewish propagandised narrative perhaps – just more jewish mind control to guilt Europeans into accepting their white genocide.
t
t
10/. Black men are more virile than white men
I know this may seem like scraping the barrel, but this topic often crops ups. I’ve had to listen to this crap all my life. It’s so obvious who is behind this myth and why they would propagate it. It is just another method to knock the white man’s confidence. To make him feel inferior to other races. Whilst at the same time programme (propagandise) white women, (along with the music industry) into believing that dating black men is a better option and somehow black men are more masculine. Hence to encourage race-mixing – just more jewish mind control to guilt Europeans into accepting their white genocide.

Sassy #fundie religionethics.co.uk

What if white was black and black was white?

Why is there no natural explanation for why we call white, white and black, black?

It does not require a supernatural explanation in the light or lack of a natural explanation.

Something are just what they are.

But if you are applying the term to the earth and the atmosphere around the earth.
What explanation is there for it to exist in a space which is devoid of all life that we can see?

Truth is man does not hold on to the truths which matter. As man procreated he forgot to remember.

The Jewish Conspiracy Exposed #conspiracy thejewishconspiracyexposed.wordpress.com

Because Jews wants race war, so they can steal money and enslave Goyim population. There is no reason to black man accuse white man for anything. It’s always been a Jew who put black man down.

Slavery was Jewish invention. Jews started to sell black people to wealthy white people in America. Jews brutally raped and molested African kids while they were hunting blacks in Africa. And they made a lot of money out of slave trade.

Civil rights movement was Jewish invention. Before civil rights movement blacks had good jobs and white and black people lived in harmony, there was a little crime among black people, because there were no drugs sold. Black people were hard workers and they totally accepted segregation of races.

But Jewish drug trafficking that even most heinous Italian Mafioso’s refused to do, changed everything. No Jew is making sure that most of black people are on drugs almost all the time. And black people are also great tool for Jews, they can always load blacks to busses and start riot when ever White people start to get mad to Jews.

Katarina was disaster, but as usual Jews wanted to take advantage of it. Jews sent their Mossad teams to New Orleans disguised as private troops. Jewish Mossad teams executed blacks and staged crimes to cause hatred against blacks among White population.

All bad things that black man has experienced since Jews brought them here as slaves, are caused by filthy Jews. Why should black man act like Jew except him to act? No, black man should fight against Jews that are the vermin’s of the world. Black and white men should join their forces together and fight against Zionist Monster, for better future and segregation and survival of both brave races.

Jared Taylor #racist #psycho amren.com

Ahmaud Arbery: The Next Trayvon Martin?

Get ready for another massive national convulsion over race. It will be just like Trayvon Martin, Michael Brown, and Freddie Gray. This time, the dead black man is Ahmaud Arbery, age 25. The whites who shot him are Gregory McMichael, age 64, and his son, Travis McMichael, 34.

There is no presumption of innocence. Joe Biden tweeted that “Ahmaud Arbery was killed in cold blood.” Elizabeth Warren says that what happened is “sickening.” Ilhan Omar is quite sure that Arbery “was lynched. Killed in cold blood simply for being a Black man in America.” Kamala Harris tweeted that the killing “sickens me to my core.” The president of the Georgia NAACP says, “The modern-day lynching of Mr. Arbery is yet another reminder of the vile and wicked racism that persists in parts of our country.” Even National Review just ran an article called, “The Murder of Ahmaud Arbery.”

The two white men’s addresses are now splashed across the internet and, as this lad notes, “Street gets its revenge always. This guy and his son gone be dead soon enough. And I’ll gladly praise that day.”

So, what happened? Unlike previous celebrated “modern lynchings,” at least some of the police findings are public. Their lives may be ruined, but there is good reason to think that what Gregory and Travis McMichael did was perfectly legal.

The father, Gregory McMichael, is a former police officer and investigator for the district attorney. He lived close to a new building under construction where there had been break-ins and trespassing. Mr. McMichael had reportedly seen surveillance video of a black man trespassing. He says that on February 23, he saw a black man — who turned out to be Arbery — “hauling ass” down the street, and thought he looked like the man in the video. He and his son armed themselves and followed in a pickup truck, hoping to hold him until the police came. A friend named Bryan William followed in a second vehicle and took cellphone video. The McMichaels drove ahead of Arbery and stopped in the street.

What happened next is on this short video, and is consistent with what the McMichaels told police. They shouted at Arbery to stop because they wanted to talk to him. They say Arbery ran around the pickup and attacked Travis, the younger McMichael, who was holding a shotgun. There were three shotgun blasts as Travis and Arbery struggled for the weapon, and Arbery died at the scene.

The video recently became public, and proves that people can see the same images and see things that are completely different. George Barnhill, a Georgia DA who investigated the killing, has written a public letter summarizing his findings. He wrote that the three white men “were following, in ‘hot pursuit’, a burglary suspect, with solid first hand probable cause, in their neighborhood, and asking/telling him to stop. . . . to stop and hold this criminal suspect until law enforcement arrived.” He added, “Under Georgia Law this is perfectly legal.” He also noted that the McMichaels were legally armed. There may be other reasons besides the surveillance video to think the McMichaels had “first-hand probable cause,” but details are not yet available.

Mr. Barnhill, whose investigation included an autopsy report, reconstructed the struggle between Travel McMichael and Arbery as follows:

The 1st shot is through Arbery’s right hand palm which is consistent with him grabbing and pulling the shotgun at the barrel tip, the 2nd and 3rd wounds are consistent with the struggle for the shotgun as depicted in the video . . . . Given the fact Arbery initiated the fight, at the point Arbery grabbed the shotgun, under Georgia Law, McMichael was allowed to use deadly force to protect himself. Just as importantly, while we know McMichael had his finger on the trigger, we do not know who caused the firings. Arbery would only had to pull the shotgun approximately 1/16th to 1/8th of one inch to fire the weapon himself and in the height of an altercation this is entirely possible. Arbery’s mental health records & prior convictions help explain his apparent aggressive nature and his possible thought pattern to attack an armed man.

Arbery appears to have had a shoplifting conviction and to have brought a gun to a school illegally and resisted arrest, but it’s not clear what Mr. Barnhill meant by “mental health records.” The DA concluded that he saw no reason to arrest the men, adding that it would be up to a grand jury to hand down an indictment.

A black lawyer named Lee Merritt, who is representing the Arbery family, watched the same video and reached a different conclusion: “Mr. Arbery was pursued by three white men that targeted him solely because of his race and murdered him without justification. . . . [T]hese men must be taken into custody pending their indictment.”

DA Barnhill has recused himself from the investigation because of previous law-enforcement work with Gregory McMichael. The outside prosecutor now assigned to the case, Tom Durden, says he will take the case to the grand jury as soon as the Georgia courts end their virus shutdown. The Georgia Bureau of Investigation will also investigate.

What will happen next? Let us not forget that blacks rioted in Ferguson, Missouri, when a grand jury refused to indict the white officer, Darren Wilson, who shot Michael Brown. I think therefore it is a near certainly that Gregory and Travis McMichael will be charged with murder. They can’t risk a plea bargain because in a superheated case like this, even admitting to involuntary manslaughter will mean years in jail.

A trial could be as sensational as the Trayvon Martin case — and could turn out the same. To get a conviction, the prosecutor will have to prove guilt “beyond a reasonable doubt.” Based on the facts as they appear now — and under current Georgia law — that may not be easy. There could be another spectacular acquittal that brings howls of fury and dismay.

Whatever happens, there are many ironies here. First, all the people who are calling this a “lynching” and are screaming for punishment are, themselves, acting like a lynch mob. As now-recused DA Barnhill wrote to journalists, “People need to let the American criminal justice system work. After it is completed all of the facts and evidence will be available for the public to review.” There is no chance of that.

Second, people who hate white people — and especially white police — will trumpet this as yet another example of “open season on black men,” as if white police officers and private citizens are on the prowl for innocent black men to shoot. This is foolishness, but the media — as they are in this case — promote it tirelessly. It takes an inquiring mind to discover that a black person is nearly 30 times more likely to attack a white person than vice versa, and that police killings of blacks account for about 0.6 percent of all homicides of blacks, justified or not. Recent studies find that white officers are no more likely than black officers to shoot black suspects.

Ahmaud Arbery probably didn’t know these facts. All this reckless talk of “open season” could very well have convinced him that he would be shot no matter what he did. Instead of stopping to talk, he appears to have charged a man with a shotgun. He would surely be alive today if he had not attacked.

But the facts don’t matter; all that matters is a chance to accuse whites of racism, and many whites get just as wild a thrill out of this as blacks.

Third, Gregory and Travis McMichael have just learned what “white privilege” means. It is only because they are white and the dead man is black that the whole world knows their names. I suspect that most of the people who see this video as proof of first-degree murder would see it as justifiable self defense if this were not one of those rare acts of white-on-black violence that we are supposed to think are so common.

A society that promotes the notion of “white privilege” is admitting the opposite: Whites will always be scrutinized for “racism,” will never get the benefit of the doubt, will always be assumed guilty, and will always be held to higher and even impossible standards.

Controversies like this are inevitable when whites and blacks try to live together. Life in a multiracial society is always full of tension and conflict. In “white supremacist” America, “white privilege” means contempt and persecution. And it will get only worse.

JDOG #racist qctimes.com

Face facts:

White people don't murder black people-white people don't rob black people-white people don't cause crime in black neighborhoods-Black gangs not white ones are a cancer of this country. Bottom line- white people don't committ violent crimes against blacks.

Queen Adira #racist blackliberationlovenunity.wordpress.com

Your brain and body can’t function without Black Melanin! Few people know what Melanin, the pigment that colors the skin & hair, is found in almost every organ of the body and is necessary in order for the brain and nerves to operate, the yes to see, and the human body ot reproduce! At the core of your brain is found the “locus coeruleus,” a structure that is BLACK because it contains large amounts of (neuro) Melanin which is essential for it to operate! In fact, all the most crucial brain structures are heavily melanized!

Melanin in the brain increases from the lower primates and reaches its peak in the BLACK HUMAN. “All humans possess this Black internal brain evidence of their common Black African Origin. The All Black neuromelanin nerve tract of the brain is profound proof that the human race is a Black race, with many variations of Black, from Black-Black to Whtie-Black, all ineranally rooted in a vast sea of Brain Blackness.” Dr. Richard King * Melanin i sthe chemical key to life itself! * It is the major organizng molecule for living systems! * It’s found everywhere! -in animals, plnats (that’s why raisins are brown), soil, oceans, clounds even stars & comets! * It is essentially linked to the DNA of the genes! * It shows the potential to reproduce itself!

Black Melanin is necssary in order for humans to reproduce! Melanin is present at the inception of life: a Melanin sheath covers both the sperm and the egg! In the human embryo, the melanocytes (skin pigment cells), brain and nerve cells all originate from the same place; the neural crest. Melanocytes resemble nerve celss and are ssential for conveying energy. When Melanin is missing or insufficient in the ectoderm of the early embryo (blastula),this causes the mother to lose her baby; in the case of whites, a defective baby is produced. Black Melanin is the super absorber of all forms of energy. It has “black hole” properties. It can convert light to sound and back again!

It stores, transforms and conducts energy! The color of Black is the perfect absorber of light and all energy frequencies, giving Black Melanin thse properties! Thsus scientists describe Melanin as acting like a “black hole.” Melanin can rearrange its chemical structure to absorb ALL wavelengths of energy (sunlight, X-rays, music, radar) and can transmute and store this energy for later use! In The Isis Papers, Dr. Cress Welsing writes that Melanin gives us the ability to use our bodies as direct connections witht he God Force, the source of all Energy -like plugging a cord into a wall socket. It also gives our hair antennae-like ability.

How does Melanin cause racial differences? The science of Genetics shows that Blacks can produce all races but it is impossible for a brown, yellow or white race to produce a black race. A Japanese scientist showed that inside melanocytes (pigment cells) are tiny packets called melanosomes that contatin melanin. The four stages in the maturing of thse melanosomes counts for racial differences:

Stage 1: The melanosome is empty & doesn’t have the machinery to make melanin.

Stage 2: The melanosome has the machinery to make melanin, but is empty
of melanin.

Stage 3: The machinery is there and the melasosome is half filled with
melanin.

Stage 4: The machinery is there and the melanosome is completely filled
with melanin.

Whites have mainly stages 1 & 2, whereas all people of color have
melanin, with Blacks having more of stage 4.

Other amazing facts about Black Melanin:

* Melanin granules are “central computers” and may analyze and initiate
body responses without reporting to the brain! * Melanin slows aging & protects you from damming effects of sunlight. The darker your skin (genetically) the less it ages. Thus whites often have wrinkled skin in there 30s while Blacks often have smooth, unwrinkled skin even in “old” age. * All people of color have Melanin circulating in the blood due to spllage from the melanosomes (Melanin packets). *People containing high levels of Melanin (mainly Blacks) will always show a positve test for the use of marijuana! The chemical species found in the urine which indicates someone’s use of marijuana is also found in the urine of Blacks! * The Melanin molecule is so stable that it has been found in 150-million-year-old dinosaur fossils! It is highly resistant to chemical and physical analysis, this its precise structure is unknown!

“BLACKNESS” is a divine, cosmic principle of the Universe. BLACK is the meaning of Kam or Khem -the name which the ancient Egyptians called themselves. From this word we get “Chemistry,” the study of the building blocks of Life. Life is founded upon CARBON, the Black element present in all living matter. Black carbon atoms link to form Black Melanin, which has “Black Hole” properties! Black Holes are found at hte center of our own galaxy and countelss others. In physics, a “Black Body” isknown to be a perfect absorber and perfect radiator of all forms of light and energy. This “Black Body Radiation” is at work in the electron, as shown by Nobel prize winner, Richard Feynman.

The electron is responsible for ALL “Khem-ical” changes in matter. It has been present since the creation of the universe. The scientist, Jean Charaon proved that the electron has all the properties of the Black Hole, plus it exchanges “Black Photons” with other electrons, enabling it to continuously accumalate data. This means that if we view the electron as a carrier of memory, it has experienced everything in creation since the very beginning. Blackness is fundamental to the operation of the universe of Engery. God is the Giver of All Energy: “Blackness” (not darkness) allows the perfect reception of all wavelengths of Energy

Melanin gives Black people superior physical, mental & spiritual ability. Melanin refines the nervous system in such a way that messages from the brain reach other areas of the body most rapidly in Black people, the Original People. Black infants sit, stand, crawl and walk sooner than whites, and demonstarte more advanced cognitive skills than their white counterparts because of their abundance of Melanin. Carol Barnes writes “…your mental processes (brain power) are controlled by the same chemical that gives Black humans their superior physical (atheltics, rhythmic dancing) abilities. This chemical… is Melanin!” The abundance of Melanin in Black humans produces a superior organism physically, mentally and spiritiually. This why all the founders of the world’s great religions are Black. Melanin is the neuro-chemical basis for what is called SOUL in Black people. In the same way Blacks excel in athletics, they can excel in all other areas as well (like they did in the past!) once the road blocks are removed!

Is God Black? The Original Man was BLACK, “made in the IMAGE of God” his Parent, according to scared books. Children look like their parents. All the other races are but diluted variations of the Original Black Race. Most whites have calcified pineal glands which thwarts Melatonin production, therby limiting their moral capacity. Located in the brain, the tiny pineal & pituitary glands regulate the body’s other glands. Esoteric tradion regards the area of these glands as the third eye, seat of the soul, and the mystical Uraeus represented by the cobra on the forehead of Egyptian royalty/crowns. Why did Africans view the European as a child of God, but the Europeans viewed the African as a soulless savage? Because of “melatonin,” described as a mentally & morally stimulating humanizing hormone produced by the pineal gland.

Scientific research reveals that most whites are unable to prduce much melatonin because their pineal glands are often calcified and nonfunctioning. Pineal calcification rateswith Africans si 5-15%; Asians – 15-25%; Europeans -60-80%! This is the chemical basis for the cultural diffences between Blacks and whites, causing some Black scholars to raise the question that the European approach, that of the logical, erect, ridgid, anti-feeling posture, reflects a left brain orientation and reflects that they lack the chemical key of melatonin to turn on their unconscious and therefore cannot get into feelings. Carol Barnes writes “Melanin is responsible for the existence of civilization, philosophy, religion, truth, justice, and righteousness. Individuals (whites) containing low levels of Melanain will behave in a barbaric manner.” Melanin give humans the ability to FEEL because it is the absorber of all frequencies of energy.

Dr. Welsing wrties “Since melanin is a superior absorber of all energy , it is essential to establish this understanding of God and ‘all energy.’ The fact thaat the albinos (whties) lack melanin may also help to explain …why, in the view of many non-white peooples, they (whit4es) lack ‘spirituality” and the capacity to tune in to, and therby establish harmony and justice…”

The scientific evidence of Melanin threatens the ideology of white supremacy. After considering Melain to be a “waste” product of body-metabolism which “served no useful function,” Western (white) science has now discovered that Melanin is the chemical key to life and the brain itself! All studies and facts about Melanin suggest that after 400 years of attempting to inferiorize the Black race, “Western science is facing the sobering reality that, by its own self-defined standards, Black people are probably superior to whites in both intellectual potential and muscle Coordination.” (Sepia magazine interview). The central role Melanin plays in the body has been “suppressed to maintain the mythological inferiority of blacks…and the defensive clinging to whiteness as some token of superiority.” (Dr. Richard King)

The “superiority complex” of white people is a defense mechanism and a mas for their deepset inferiority complex which they project onto people of color. Psychologists say insistent denial means readlity in the opposite way. If whites really believed that white skin was “superior,” why is “tanning” so important in white culture despite its known health risks (thousands die annually from skin cancer). Also, curling or permming lifeless, straight hair, and the lastest; lip injections for a fuller look! And it is the white female who tells you that her ideal mate is “tall, DARK, and handsome!” “Dark” indeed refers to more Melanin!

B from CA #racist shtfplan.com

B from CA says:
Comment ID: 3678224
March 21, 2017 at 10:52 pm

Blacks are easy targets for conversion to Islam because it appeals to their feelings. Everything good has come from blacks, and whites are inferiors and Devils. Eighty per cent of conversions in prison are conversion to Islam. The blacks are being taught to hate white people. Millions of Blacks believe the most rediculous things. It would be funny if it were not so dangerous. Going to prison is a perfect place for recruitment. There are many books on the relationship between Blacks and Chews.

This is part of the Chew Communist Agenda to destroy America. This is a ChewWish globalist plot to enslave these Blacks once the Blacks take over and whites are too few to prevent it from happening. Waters is an affirmative action, left over from the glory days of the Black Panthers.

White people need to wake up. It’s the Chews behind promoting Blacks like Waters. Whether or not President Trump is or is not impeached is not the real core problem, is it.

pizza with hot pepper #racist unz.com

One of the big realities of American life is black-on-non-black crime, violence, and rape.

But because the media and academia are controlled by Liberals, young NON-BLACKS have been brainwashed with the cult of the Magic Negro. It’s PC to make white girls fear and hate white males but un-PC to alert white girls to the danger of black crime.

Even Paglia won’t touch this racial angle. Though men of all races are capable of violence and rape, it is a bigger problem with black males. Every year, there are 10,000s of black-on-white rape but virtually no white-on-black rape.

But the problem may be bigger than white female naivete. According to Paglia, the problem exists because white girls have been coddled in protective surroundings.
This may be true with some.

But there are white girls who hook up with dangerous black men because they watch sports, listen to pop music, and watch porn and become excited and turned on by the thrill of the mighty mandingo stud. So, even though they know the danger, the lust-thrill element is too much for them to resist.

It’s like kids know that it’s dangerous to do tricks with skateboards but they just can’t resist the thrill.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aFXxmwHUpis

NIGGA #racist forum.myspace.com

THE BLACK REVOLUTION IS COMING

[t]hank you white people for for being so naive
Step 1-The jews take control over the media
Step 2-Jews make up lies such as the holocaust, slavery and persecution and teach it to the young naive minds of white children
step 3-Jews start promoting multiculturalism and the whites actually follow it
step 4-whites soon think it is ok for blacks to be racist
step 5-a staged beating of rodney king causes riots to start
Step 6-It soon becomes illegal for cops to enter black inhabited neighborhoods
Step 7-Rap "music" is promoted to white people
Step 8-Black people appear on television more
Step 9-Positive black stereotypes are often displayed on television
Step 10-White women actually believe the stereotypes and begin seeking black males
Step 11-White women soon think it is racist to turn down a black male
Step 12-It is soon required by law for white women to reproduce with black males
Step 13-The genocide of white males begins. White people dont fight back because they belive the lies that they were taught in school so they think that white genocide is right.
Step 14-After about 20 years the world becomes black populated.
Step 15-The world is destroyed soon after by the blacks.

Melinda Jelliby #racist robertlindsay.wordpress.com

How much support is there among blacks or Hispanics for women's liberation, homosexual rights, environmental protection, saving the whales, the United Nations, fighting child labor overseas, opposition to nuclear testing, etc.? None, because these issues offer no useful racial angles. It is only the rare, odd-ball black who works for any cause – liberal or conservative – that isn't a more or less obvious scheme to get more money or power for blacks. Non-whites are not "liberals" in any real sense; they are racial activists, pure and simple, even though white liberals are too stupid to see it. One way to gauge the "liberalism" of blacks is to ask yourself how they would behave if they had their own equivalent of blacks to deal with, that is, if they were beset by a group that was as unproductive, crime-prone, pesky and importunate to them as blacks are to whites. Would they support welfare and "affirmative action" for the little dears? Judging from the way Africans deal with troublesome elements, if blacks had their own equivalent of blacks they might well exterminate them.

Jane Moss #racist amren.com

Hispanics are not the only new group in my school. There is also a modest population of Muslim “refugees” from the Middle East. Muslim students are better behaved and more academically adept than the illegals from Central and South America, and generally stick to themselves. They are far from perfect, though. From time to time you can overhear them talking in sympathetic tones about Islamic Fundamentalists, and how white girls are fun to have sex with, but should never be considered as a possibility for a girlfriend or a wife.

Racial tensions are always high at my school, and sometimes they explode. Not too long ago, the school caught wind of a group of black students planning a food fight after they advertised the event on Snapchat. In response, security was beefed up and announcements were made warning students not to participate in it or face consequences. This made no difference whatsoever. The battle was kicked off by a black teenager who threw a full can of soda at a school police officer, knocking her out cold. He high-fived his black friends when she hit the floor.

As food began flying through the air in every direction and fist-fights broke out, the nearly 1,500 students in the cafeteria spilled out into the hallways and then out of the building. En route, a substitute teacher was knocked down and trampled, earning her a broken leg. In my wing of the building, the one white security guard and I sent the students who were trying to escape the violence — most of them white — into my classroom to hide. Order was only restored when the SWAT team arrived.

The “outrage culture” the school is steeped in makes everything worse. Black teenagers are well versed in their victimhood status, and accusations of “racism” are never ending. If you are older and white, students assume the worst of you and go out of their way to disrupt your classes and say outrageous things about white people in order to provoke you. They are always trying to make you lose your cool and say something inappropriate — all while the students have the camera on their phones at the ready, waiting to document you at your worst. They are well aware that all it takes is one slip up to end a career.

Even earnest liberals sometimes end up being victims of politically correct sensitivity. At another school I worked in, a principal presented district test scores broken down by race to the school staff. The difference between whites and blacks was enormous, and he told us that we needed to work together to come up with innovative strategies to close this achievement gap. He was passionate, motivated, and really believed that if we just taught the right way, we could close this “unfair” and “racist” difference in average test scores. A black staffer then got in touch with the local NAACP, accusing the principal of racism simply for having acknowledged the gap, and the well-meaning principal was forced into retirement.

Affirmative action and “diversity” are both enforced in two ways: 1) Officially, by the administration and its policies. 2) Informally, through violence and chaos — either threatened or carried out — by the black students. For example, administrators tell teachers that every social media post, photo, video, brochure, etc. tied to the school must have non-white students in it. But when something accidentally doesn’t, it isn’t necessarily those administrators who dole out the punishment.

Recently, the school newspaper had a cover photo of our lacrosse team. The students in the photograph were all white. Since there were no black students in the picture, the newspaper was dubbed “so white,” and blacks used this as an excuse to misbehave for the entire day. In class, if the artwork or historical period being studied involves lots of whites, the black students act up in outrage until the class becomes unteachable, thereby incentivizing you to focus on “black” topics as much as possible.

Worst of all is the leniency black students are given in all disciplinary measures. The administrators are desperate to even out the statistics that show how much more frequently blacks are suspended and expelled relative to whites — or even Hispanics. The result is that black students are often given slaps on the wrist for heinous acts, while whites face lengthy suspensions for minor infractions. Moreover, if you write-up a black student or call his parents, friends of the troublemaker, in what they see as an act of solidarity, sometimes punish you for having done this by bursting into your classroom and causing a scene.

Black children seemed to be trained to deny responsibility for their actions from a very early age, even when caught in the act. I’ve seen children as young as five yelling, “I di’n’t do nuffin” as they were being carted off to the principal’s office. They know nothing is expected of them and act accordingly. They are hypnotized by their phones, spending most of the day on them trying to become social media starlets. None of them ever bring their own school supplies, knowing they will get them for free from either the school or the naively generous white moms who donate them.

A concerted pushback against all of this madness could, in theory, be brought about by a group of experienced, dedicated teachers and staff. But racial preferences in hiring make creating such a group impossible. My district has minority recruiting fairs even as they make huge layoffs. They’ll take just about anyone if they are brown. The current assistant principal, for example, sometimes seems like she’s functionally illiterate — her assistants have to help her write official documents. But since she isn’t white, she receives nothing but praise and accolades to go with her hefty salary.

The small number of whites who attend my school have it the worst. They get attacked, robbed, and verbally berated on a regular basis by their “peers.” Many white students suffer from anxiety and self-esteem issues, leading to problems with drugs and self-harm. Given the anti-white bias in the teaching curriculum — which is steadily getting worse — it isn’t hard to understand why this is happening. Some parents manage to be oblivious to it all or turn a blind eye to it. More often, they’re just too poor to move to a district where their children aren’t subjected to this type of violence and degradation.

Our society denies the role of race in schools. All dissent is met with accusations of racism, public shunning, and the threat of financial ruin. But doing nothing means whites must condemn their own flesh and blood to the nightmare I’ve described — and we have a duty to protect the future for our children.

Ann Coulter #racist dailycaller.com

On a break from pretending to believe they live in a country bristling with violent white racists, the Non-Fox Media have been trying to debunk stories about the “Knockout Game,” in which young black males approach random strangers and try to knock them out with one punch.

The left’s leading line of defense against the Knockout Game is to argue that young black males have always been violent, so, hey, this is nothing new.

You’re welcome, black America!

In Slate, Emma Roller wearily recounted other episodes of black-on-white violence in order to announce: “The ‘Knockout Game’ is a myth.”

Reminiscing about the flash mobs that shook many parts of the country a few years ago, Roller wrote: “I remember the summer of 2011, a story about a crowd of (black) teenagers at the Wisconsin State Fair randomly attacking fairgoers went viral as a sign of a burgeoning race war.”

So you see, stupid right-wingers, young black males have always been violent, so what’s the big deal about the Knockout Game? Your honor, my client’s not a killer; he’s a serial killer.

MSNBC’s Chris Hayes reached for a different example of monstrous black-on-white violence in order to dispute that the Knockout Game is anything new.

Looking like a translator for the deaf with all the air quotes he had to make for “supposed” “trend,” and “Knockout Game,” Hayes compared it to what he called the fake trend of “wilding” after a mob of black youths violently attacked and raped a white woman jogging in New York’s Central Park in 1989. According to Hayes, “there never was such a thing” as wilding.

[...]

The following year, 1990, blacks committed 57 percent of all the violent crime against whites, while whites committed only 2 percent of the violent crime against blacks, according to the Department of Justice’s annual Victimization Report.

Thanks for the memories, Chris!

Oh, and contrary to Hayes’ proclamation, black men raping white women is something of a “trend” — at least according to FBI crime statistics. At least since 1997 (I got bored and stopped looking any farther back) blacks have raped several thousand white women every year, while white-on-black rapes have numbered between “0.0? and “Sample based on 10 or fewer.”

David J. Stewart #fundie jesus-is-savior.com

image
Messenger Elijah Muhammad

Meet Elijah Muhammad (pictured above). He’s the founder of the Black Muslim Nation (religion). Elijah Muhammad was born in October of 1897 in Georgia to William and Marie Poole. He grew up poor with 7 brothers and 5 sisters. His father was a Baptist preacher. It’s hard to imagine Elijah Muhammad growing up in a Baptist home and then becoming a Muslim (one who adheres to the Islamic Faith), but he did. Genuine Muslims and Baptists believe each other are going straight to hell. Elijah Muhammad was a devout Muslim and believed that only Allah was God, not Jesus.

The Black Muslims have an official web site at “Muhammad Speaks Website.” The following quotes are taken directly off their web sight:

The following article was transcribed from a video-taped lecture of the 1973 "Savior's Day" Lecture given by Elijah Muhammad titled: A Savior Is Born, February 26, 1877—-“Brothers and Sisters, I'm so happy to see your smiling faces, who have come here from far and near to help us give thanks to Almighty God, Allah, Who came in the Person of Master Fard Muhammad, To Whom Praises is due Forever.”

Elijah Muhammad met W. D. Fard in 1931 for the first time and believed that Mr. Fard was literally Allah incarnate, with a message for Elijah to spread to all nations. Here are Elijah’s own words:

“In Detroit one day in the latter part of 1931, our leader met with Master W.D. Fard --THE SAVIOUR--Who was teaching among Blacks at 3208 Hasting Street. Our Leader immediately recognized the POWER of THE MESSAGE and THE MAN (MASTER W. D. FARD) Who said that He was God in Person. Our Leader, right away, accepted the Truth of the Message and the giver of the Message, seeking more insight, more wisdom, knowledge and more understanding.”

image Master Fard Muhammad

Elijah Muhammad claimed that Mr. Fard had a black father who purposely married a white woman so their son would be white (to allow him to sneak into the U.S.A. unnoticed and liberate all blacks). Elijah believed that he was the last great prophet that Allah (W.D. Fard) would send before the end of the world. Here are Elijah Muhammad’s objectives:

“I am doing all I can to make the so-called Negroes see that the white race and their religion (Christianity) are their open enemies, and to prove to them that they will never be anything but the devils' slaves and finally go to hell with them for believing and following them and their kind.”

So it’s clear that one cannot be a Christian and a Black Muslim. Elijah Muhammad (as do all Muslims), rejects the deity of Christ (that He is God). They don’t believe Jesus was ever crucified, nor do they believe that Jesus can forgive sin. They say God has no Son. They claim Jesus was a prophet of Allah, no more. Both Islam (Muslims) and Black Muslims reject the Bible (Word of God) on the claim that it is distorted and corrupt, they claim the Quran (also Koran) as God’s only Word. The Quran is nothing more than an Anti-Jew, anti-Christian book filled with jumbled words and much contempt for Jesus Christ and His Word. It’s important to recognize
that orthodox Muslims (followers of the Islamic religion) are not the same thing as Black Muslims. Nearly all Muslims reject Elijah Muhammad and his foolishness. Elijah was first a Muslim and then simply started his own false religion in addition. Muslims do not recognize Elijah Muhammad as anything except a nut. However, the two religions do have quite a bit in common—mainly that Elijah Muhammad was an Islamic Muslim.
Elijah Muhammad foolishly claimed that the Bible prophesied of his coming in Deuteronomy 18:18 and Malachi 4:5.
Let’s hear what this prophet says about white people:

“The Yakub made devils were really pale white, with really blue eyes; which we think are the ugliest of colors for a human eye. They were called Caucasian.”

According to Elijah Muhammad, Yakub was a black scientist that created the white race in a laboratory by separating one of his own black germs; hence, all white people came from a black man. Elijah adds,

“The black nation is only fooling themselves to take the Caucasian race otherwise. This is what Jesus learned to their history, before He gave up His work of trying to convert the Jews or white race to the religion of Islam.

The Holy Quran (Surah 49:13-15) throws a great light on the truth of the creation of this pale, white race of devils. Black people have a heart of gold, love and mercy. Such a heart, nature did not give to the white race.”

Wow! This is religious science-fiction at it’s best folks.
If you want to know the sickening truth, visit their site at muhammadspeks.com Beware, this is a hate site in our opinion.

Muhammad was a racist, full of hate and resentment for all Christians and white people. This is wrong, and two wrongs don’t make a right! Racism is a sin, period! The Bible says, “For ALL HAVE SINNED…” (Romans 3:23). All men, of all races, of all religions are sinful and wicked. The Jews (whites) were enslaved for hundreds of years by the Egyptians, enduring cruel treatment and hard labor in the time of Moses. Elijah Muhammad is wrong to teach that white people are devils, WE ARE ALL DEVILS WITHOUT JESUS CHRIST!

Elijah Muhammad had a strong influence over multitudes of blacks because of his message against the cruelty, killings and slavery which was inflicted upon them by many of the whites. He offered a message of hope. Sadly, he rejected Jesus Christ and led many multitudes down a wrong path to Islam (Allah worship). His influence is still great today even though he died in 1975. His foolish teachings concerning the white race are ludicrous and simply indicate the bitterness and anger he was never able to resolve in his own sinful heart. He was a man without Christ!

Malcolm-X (or Malcolm Little) first converted to the Black Muslim religion while in prison. Upon his release in 1952, Malcolm-X became a minister of the Black Muslim religion. In 1963, he and Elijah Muhammad split up due to their differences. Malcolm converted over to orthodox Islam and denied his affiliation with Elijah Muhammad’s Black Muslim religion. Two years later in 1965, Malcolm-X was murdered.

Louis Farrakhan is also a Black Muslim and is well known for organizing the “Million-Man March” in Washington D.C. He follows the unscriptural doctrines of Elijah Muhammad, as do all Black Muslims. Below is the death announcement of Messenger Elijah Muhammad:

“On February 25, 1975, at the age of 78, Elijah Muhammad died in a Chicago hospital, reportedly, of congestive heart failure -- with no aid from white people, he left behind, an empire, estimated to be worth $60,000,000, which included LAND and cattle holdings in Michigan, Georgia and Alabama, along with grocery stores, restaurants, mosques, schools and newspapers, homes, clothing stores and many other things.”

All this wealth and Elijah Muhammad couldn’t take a dime of it with him. He left this world at 78 without Jesus and went straight to hell-fire and damnation. He didn’t go to hell because of his sins, but for his unbelief in Jesus Christ. All Muslims (Islamic and Black) reject Jesus Christ as their Savior. They say they will accept the Jews and Christians—"If they reject Christ." Will you reject Jesus Christ, God’s son? Call on Jesus now, friend, to forgive your sins.

Nya Major #sexist edendecoded.com

Many black women are leading black men to be anti-Trump because it's the end of the road for some of these women. These black women have been using their alliance with their Liberal white daddy for decades to checkmate the black man and to enjoy a false sense of power over him.

Check the lives of these type of women. They're the type who don't typically have a man, can't get a man or can't keep one. Nor do these women have a family. Because a family would consist of having a man as the head of it.

Instead what you have is female-led communities that are filled with: high crime, poverty, fornication, abortion, occult stores, liquor stores, hair stores, bars, nightclubs and trap houses: that are being presided over by rebellious women who've spent the last 40 years telling God how they don't "need a man" - which is precisely why they don't have one!

These women hate Trump for the same reason they hate every Republican: because Republicans don't cater to the dysfunction of black women.

Conservatives don't treat black women as victims the way liberals do. Instead they require accountability from black women just as equally as they do from black men and everyone else.

Sorry black men, but most of you are too easy. It's the truth, and every black woman in America knows it. A little batting of the eye lids, swishing of the hips, pedicured hands and feet, showing a little cleavage, and pretending to be a woman in distress is all that is usually needed to bring out the simp in most of you. Couple this with the fact that most black men today have been raised by single moms who teach you to actually hate yourselves - and we have the perfect recipe for creating the type of men who'll put up with any amount of dysfunction coming from today's black women.

Donald Trump has an agenda that he termed a New Deal for Black America. Look it up. It would effectively end decades of urban blight and economic depression that black Americans have been suffering under through racist policies carried out and overseen by Democrats. Just look at Flint Michigan for a perfect example. Years of Democrat leadership has given us one of the worst water crisis in history!

Notice how the liberal media never talk about Trump's New Deal for Black America? That's because it would actually help strengthen the black man's position.

Here we FINALLY have a U.S. sitting president who has a specific agenda to bring the African American community in urban cities out of the financial and economic dumps and into the modern era by:

•focusing on job creation,
•strengthening black families (which include the black man instead of excluding him), and
•encouraging entrepreneurship for black men and women - and now the Democrats want to be the party of opposition to everything Trump does?

This nonsense about Russia has less to do with Russia and more to do with attempting to stop Trump from rolling out his agenda to put working class black and white families on a better financial footing; which would effectively end much of the racial/class problems currently plaguing the nation.

Trump's New Deal for Black America would also end the destabilization of the black community by:

•helping black men become equally employed and earning healthy incomes.
•taking the power of provision away from black women alone.
•and redistributing that power equally along the sexes.

And Democrats can't have that now can they? They thrive from the basic discontent from Americans who feel isolate and ran over by governmental policies that were basically created and implemented by Democrats! It's the ultimate sleight of hand deception. Remember: Democrats are the party that fought FOR slavery and Jim Crow laws that completely disenfranchised black Americans.

The Democrats helped implement the current child support/child custody laws that deprive fathers of the right to have easy access to their own offspring. The only reason why any woman would oppose correcting these inequalities is because she wants them to persist.

SO BLACK MEN: steer clear from black women who support an anti-Trump agenda. They are a death trap for the black man's soul. These women don't honor black men, don't like black men nor respect black men.

These women are full of man-hate and have a great disdain for Jesus Christ too - though they'll claim to love and serve Christ with all their heart and soul. Because if they truly loved Christ as they claim, they would respect the divine order He placed in first the home and then the Church: which these type of women never do. And for this reason so many of them have started becoming pastors and preachers and are okay with creating households that women are the head over.

But to God be the glory; He'll make everything right. And what you see in the image below, will come to pass again to liberate Black Men: a time in history - 1869 to 1873 - when all black men had equal rights in the United States, and were elected and appointed to senatorial and representative positions in government.

Many black men have already removed the blinders and have realigned with their political party of freedom: for financial freedom, spiritual freedom, legal freedom, and simply freedom to be a man!

Jesse Lee Peterson #racist #wingnut #fundie wnd.com

GRIEVANCE INDUSTRY
LOVE WHITE PEOPLE OR LEAVE MY COUNTRY!
Exclusive: Jesse Lee Peterson challenges the true racists in government

Somehow in this country, white people became the only ones called “racist” (even though “racism” does not exist; it’s either right or wrong, good or evil). Everyone is encouraged to hate white people. The Civil Rights Movement, which I regret participating in, only brought destruction. Blacks forced white private businesses to service them, and whites began catering to blacks. Then other immoral people came in and used black people for their own agenda, to bully the weak whites. Women who hate men, radical homosexuals, illegal aliens and others seduced black false leaders, comparing their wicked causes to blacks’ supposed “struggle.”

I often ask black and Hispanic liberal guests on my talk shows, “Do you love white people?” Rarely can they simply answer, “Yes.” But when I ask them if they love blacks or Mexicans, it’s suddenly an easy answer – “Yes!”

This month of July is my second annual celebration of White History Month. America is great thanks to white people. But it’s so overrun with blind white-hating people that we now have a Muslim woman with a head rag in Congress! Rep. Ilhan Omar, D.-Minn., is an evil, America-hating, Christian-hating “social justice warrior.” But she falsely claims, “I probably love this country more than anyone that is naturally born.” Her kind of “love” is the same emotional, egotistical spirit as angry single black mothers who raise thugs and defend them when they commit crimes.

I’ve been saying for years that if anyone does not love this country, they can leave! If you hate white people, and you believe in so-called “racism,” even though whites let you into this country, go back to Africa or wherever you came from! Same with the white communist antifa members who hate American freedom – get out of my country!

Order Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson’s book, “The Antidote: Healing America from the Poison of Hate, Blame, and Victimhood.”

President Trump rightly said the same thing in a few tweets last Sunday. He suggested that these “progressive” Democrat Congresswomen “go back and help fix the totally broken and crime infested places from which they came.” He’s right. But they won’t, because they’re hypocrites – including Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib and Ayanna Pressley. Not only will they not fix their own communities, they want to mess up ours! They only offer abortion, immoral socialism, false victimhood and hatred of white people, men and Christians.

Although the president defended white female Democrat Nancy Pelosi against false accusations of “racism” by Cortez, Pelosi turned on Trump, paying back evil for good. In order to help “women of color” who hate her, Pelosi led a controversial vote condemning what she falsely called “racist tweets,” denigrating the president. In response, Trump pointed out that “this was the first time since 1984 that the Speaker of the House was ruled Out of Order and broke the Rules of the House.”

Thank God, a beautiful crowd in Greenville, North Carolina echoed the president’s sentiments, chanting, “Send her back!” – referring to America-hating, Israel-hating Ilhan Omar. The children of the lie, including the liberal media, Democrats, RINO Republicans and Never Trumpers, of course freaked out over the lack of political correctness. These deceivers hate good people, and support America’s enemies. Weak, cowardly establishment Republicans begged the president to distance himself from the “send her back” chant, which he obliged to a point. But when pressed by media, the president stood by the people of North Carolina as “incredible patriots.”

President Trump loves America, and said that these Democrat women “can’t get away with” denigrating its people. “I’m unhappy that a Congresswoman … can call our country and our people ‘garbage.'” He referred to Cortez (the socialist), who trashed the opportunities offered by this country, and called the late President Reagan and working white people “racist.”

Trump said, “I can tell you this, you can’t talk that way about our country, not when I’m the president.” These are the words of a real man. Not a weak, pathetic person concerned with silly notions of “racism,” “sexism” and whatever else they come up with – Trump stands on what’s right. He’s a straight, white, conservative Christian man of power – everything the children of the lie hate.

Ilhan Omar promised to be the president’s “nightmare,” which really means she wants to be America’s nightmare. Trump said, “She’s lucky to be where she is. … And the things that she has said are a disgrace to our country.”

I say shame on us for allowing such a woman to come here. But this is what evil wants. It’s time for the people on the side of good to stand up. Thankfully, President Trump is doing that.

There’s nothing more important than rebuilding men. There are no men in the Democrat Party – only weak beta males. Women run the Democrat Party, which is anti-American and of Satan. We saw what happened when men disappeared from black homes. The black community worships “mama” while they kill one another. Now other races, including whites, follow in blacks’ footsteps of self-destruction, by following women. Whites have turned to weakness and surrender, thinking the people of color will love them. That’s not the way.

Watch and learn from this president, who makes evil unwelcome again.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=D_J1HRwqt94

Jason #racist whitakeronline.org

Yet, in truth, no Whites are universalists. Every White liberal assumes White superiority. They would never dream of holding Blacks and Browns to the same moral standards they hold Whites. Their view of non-Whites is, from a moral standpoint, that of a child.

If they believe in universalism, why don’t they demand Japan open up to Multiculturalism? Or Nigeria? Or any other non-White country.

In fact, all White liberals act paternalistically toward non-Whites, and that very paternalism implies a belief in inequality.

StuckNthePast #racist stormfront.org

America is Black & White

I'm against all these "hyphenated-American" denominations. After the emancipation of black slaves, America was black and white or white and black. That's how it should have stayed. There were NO problems when we didn't have 12+ Asian or Latino nationals invading our neighborhoods, corrupting our language, our diet, our way of life ...

Blacks at least spoke English and did not insist on having everything from street signs to legal documents translated into a gazillion different African tongues like and Asians do. The church my grandmother frequented in Orange County as a little girl displays Vietnamese signs and even holds services in Vietnamese. WTF?

Deport them all I say ... I much rather live alongside with blacks because, personally, I've never had issues with them. I think it's incredibly racist to continue all these attacks on blacks because of how they look when the real problem are the nonwhite immigrants that invade us like locus. Blacks are such a small segment of the population and if we weren't importing more from Africa or the Caribbean there would be even fewer. With time that population would shrink.

I much preferred it if Americans abroad were thought of consisting of Whites and Blacks. That's how it was for a long time. Our old movies had black characters and that wasn't threatening. We had black athletes, black entertainers, jazz musicians, you name it. Yet, it didn't change the character of a White, Christian America. Now, it's all changed for the worst!

Anyway, I feel our number one problem are the Asians (including Indians who may speak English but don't assimilate and walk around wearing saris) and the Latinos. The blacks or negroes, as you call them, pale by comparison.

The Truth #racist smartpunters.com

Yes, you guessed it, niggers are a global plague to civilized societies. There's no mistaking it, while some above make wild claims that "red necks" are the low man, I offer the following observations of the poor class:

1.) Poor "white trash" at least own their shelter - the much maligned trailer. Unlike the wild urban monkey, that calls Public housing projects (aka zoo cage) home.

2.) Poor white people hold family structure - unlike blacks, who don't know the identity of their father from conception, and have multiple unknown siblings from said unknown silverback males.

3.) Poor white people work. Blacks? Do I really need to explain.

4.) Poor white people commit demonstrably less crime than do blacks.

5.) Refer to 1 - Poor white people are responsible. That is, they don't bring a dozen hungry mouths into this world so that Uncle Sam can feed them.

6.) White people are homo-sapiens. Blacks are pseudo-sapiens. (For more about why blacks are scientifically proven to be inferior, see my previous post under "Gimme dat money...from July 2009).

I encourage everyone to visit the department of justice online to read up on crime statistics (quick, before Nigger-in-charge decides to pull it down). Even a quick search on wikipedia regarding "race and intelligence" will surely open some eyes (and don't forget to read the references). Search google scholar papers to read university research findings on race and IQ. Or, turn a blind eye, continue to think that we're all equal, and sleep through life.

Crush the liberal agenda with raw facts. Open eyes to the truth.

- the Truth

blackbird #racist baptistboard.com

By and large I believe that God created the races for a reason. And I believe that the races belong together-white with white, black with black, red with red, yellow with yellow. White should be looking for a white marriage and black should be looking for a black marriage--get my drift??"

"Now, as a Senior Pastor of a SBC conservative church--would I marry a white/black in a church sanctioned marriage?? Not if the parents had a problem with it or if my members had a problem with it.

Mike Adams #racist naturalnews.com

If you’ve ever wondered whether violent black hoodlums are targeting white people for extreme violence, hatred and felony assault, this sickening, racially motivated violence — broadcast live by Facebook — just confirmed it once and for all. In fact, black-on-white crime is now far more prevalent, violent and hate-oriented than white-on-black crime across America, as the following statistics reveal.

African-Americans are only 13% of the population but commit over 50% of the murders

...

Left-wing media all but blacklisting the gruesome story, hoping no one learns the truth about black-on-white hate crime in America

Not surprisingly, this “lynching” of a white special needs boy is being almost completely censored by the entire left-wing media that incited it. The dishonest “fakestream” media only reports news that fits their false narratives. Thus, if four white teens had bound, beaten and kidnapped a young black boy, it would be headline news everywhere, alongside nationwide riots in every major city.

...

When black people are attacked by white people, that’s headline news everywhere. But when a white boy is tortured, kidnapped, scalped and beaten by black thugs, it’s not “news” to the left-wing media. That’s how the media pretends black people commit almost no crimes at all when, in truth, they are the ones carrying out the vast majority of violent crimes across America, according to U.S. Justice Department statistics.

loudlytransparenttrash #fundie loudlytransparenttrash.tumblr.com

10 Leftist Myths That Shouldn’t Be Repeated


1. WE ARE A NATION OF IMMIGRANTS

No, we’re not. We’re a nation of citizens. This country was built on legal immigration, and the ones who made it through learned the language and assimilated. Many didn’t get in. Today’s scenario is 15 million illegals ridiculing those who played by the rules. Legal immigrants wait 15 years to get green cards and many bring a ton of jobs with them. The Statue of Liberty doesn’t say “Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, and all their relatives.” Learn the difference between legal and illegal.

Oh, and don’t give me that old “They’re doing jobs Americans won’t do” line. They’re doing jobs Americans won’t do - for that price. In Canada, there are no Mexicans and the landscaping still gets done. They use teenagers.

2. THIS COUNTRY WAS BUILT ON SLAVERY

This old trope. A few rich Southerners had slaves. Then there was a civil war and America’s bank account dropped to zero. After that the country was rebuilt from scratch without slavery. As Pat Buchanan put it, we didn’t start slavery. We ended it.

3. WE STOLE THE COUNTRY FROM PEACEFUL INDIANS

We fought them for 400 years. They fought against us, alongside us, and behind us. Fighting for land has always been part of the human race, long before we landed here. Asia, Africa, Europe, we’ve all done it but only one country is told to feel guilty for it. Today we would call this “stealing”. But for a long time, this was considered acceptable behaviour.

Before we got here the Indians were fighting each other, and yes, it was savage. War Before Civilization: The Myth of the Peaceful Savage describes horrific mass graves from way before we got here. Indians used to shoot arrows into their victims for hours after the guy died so he’d be stuffed in the afterlife. Oh and the smallpox blankets is a myth.

4. AMERICA IS RACIST

Studies show that white people are actually the least racist group. Getting rid of all the racists would mean America would be almost all white. Therefore, fighting racism is racist.

5. BLACK YOUTH ARE TARGETED BY WHITE MEN

Fact time. Black youth are in danger but it’s not white men killing them. Over 1,400 more black Americans murdered other blacks between 2010-2011 than were lynched from 1882 to 1968. Despite making up just 13% of the population, blacks committed half of homicides in the United States for nearly 30 years. In 2012, black people - at just a fifth of the size - committed almost 1,000 more murders than their white counterparts. It would take cops 40 years to kill as many black men as have died at the hands of others black men in 2012 alone. Black and Hispanic police officers are more likely to fire a gun at blacks than white officers. Blacks are 18.5 times more likely to kill cops than be killed by cops. Let’s not forget the black on white rape.

6. PRO-LIFERS ARE SEXIST

Most women are pro-life. To ignore their rights while touting abortion is sexist. Also, gender-based abortion is becoming more popular. We’ve seen how that goes for women in China. It ain’t pretty. So stop using abortion rights as some kind of proof there’s a war on women when the opposite is true.

7. WE NEED FREE HEALTH CARE

Not so fast. Have you seen the way this administration handles money? We’re 17 trillion in the hole. That’s a lot. Seventeen trillion seconds ago we were cavemen trying to figure out fire. This country is rife with severe obesity and millions upon millions of illegals. We don’t have the cohesion and health that other free health care countries have, so this perfectly reasonable idea is actually impossible until we sort our shit out.

8. AMERICA IS GETTING WORSE

The air has never been cleaner. We’ve never lived longer. Crime is at an all-time low. By virtually every possible metric, life has never been better. Traveling, eating, sex, fighting - all safer than ever. The list goes on and on. I saw a homeless man today checking his iPhone while he asked for change. If you think things were so much better back then or in another country, get in either a time machine or plane and go there and let’s see how long you survive.

9. DIVERSITY IS OUR STRENGTH

When it comes to restaurants this is true, and that is why people always use restaurants to prove it. By any other standard, it tends to go pretty badly. We should be encouraging everyone to err towards the same values. Assimilation leads to a sense of fraternity and that means a cohesive society. Why do you think Japan is so successful and get along so well? They are packed in there like sardines but they don’t mind because they’re all the same. When integration is discouraged you get Balkanization.

10. WE’RE ALL EQUAL

You realize the children of geniuses tend to be smarter than the children of stupid people, yeah? This is why they ask sperm donors questions. That’s what happens when idealists have to practice what they preach. They scoff at eugenics until it’s time to make a baby. They love the gay lifestyle until their son brings home a tranny. They love diversity until it’s time to choose a place to live or a school for their children. They pretend we’re all equal but they insist the government enforce this because they secretly know it isn’t true and in fact see themselves as superior to everyone else. They’re free to think that, but before going on a rant about it, maybe they should look up some basic facts first.

70Stage1 #racist moonbattery.com

[H]ow old are you and where did you grow up? I started 1st grade in 1965, the small town I grew up in had segregated schools. In 1966, started the 2nd grade, the schools were integrated. Played with blacks, did sports, etc, throughout the school years. I never had a hard time getting along with them at all, and I think they never had a hard time getting along with me. What I did notice, even at a young age in 1966, was the immediate pandering and fawning over their blackness. They absolutely got away with more than any White or Mexican kid, and they knew it, even joked about it (special treatment, different discipline, adjusted grades, moved or forced their way to the front of any line for any event, entitlements, all kinds of double standards, etc). When I went on to college, it was even more blatant.

I know they had a rough go up until 1964 or so, but I had no part in that, neither did any of my ancestors. I came from a long line of poor white trash, half of which only came to the US around the turn of the century. I just wanted to better myself, and nobody was going to do it for me, except me. Liberals act like every White American family (especially in the South) had slaves (in 1860 only 1.8 percent of American families owned 1 or more slaves. 4.8 percent of Southerners did). Liberals act/think like there are no poor Whites, or any other ethnic groups that have had to struggle, except Blacks.

Double standards and prejudice are ramping up and getting worse as the years go on. You can’t deny this. Ever see a Black kid wearing a famous White athlete’s jersey? Ever see a Black family adopt a white baby from a broken/bad home. Notice how all the newer TV commercials portray the White guy as the goofy doofus that must get guidance from the wise Black Man. No wonder we’re seeing all the young Black violence on others (especially White). It is taught in the broken home that Whites are responsible for their current situation. The green light has been given, justification for this behavior has been established because of something that happened at least 60-200 years ago. I’m just wondering how long America is going to have to pay for alleged sins of the past (even though very few people are still alive that were a part of or were responsible for those sins)?

I’m trying to be colorblind. I trying to give everyone the same chance to be guided by the same moral and ethical compass.

I’m just tired of the excuses and blame.

George #racist occidentaldissent.com

The jews run this country for the blacks. Now the jews with their jew owned television net works are all calling for the disarmament of Whites. Blacks won’t turn their weapons in nor will criminals, I know I am being redundant. The jews saw how successful the destruction of White America was using blacks, so the jews have insisted that all White nations import blacks from where ever and of course Whites have yield to the jews as they always have. Reminds me of when the black racist Jamie Foxx said in the movie Dejango unchained “I kill all the Whites.” The Whites in the audience laughed, because liberal Whites always think when niggers and hispanics make such statements he means other Whites, not me.

Saxoness #racist stormfront.org

10 things Black People are Fearful of after Trayvon Martin that White people already Know

Let me tell you something; Let me tell you something about being White in this country:

In the time since the Zimmerman verdict came in, I have been reading and hearing many things stated by Black people in regards to fears of how this verdict may affect their quality of life in the future, or how it “proves” that they have things to worry about. They have expressed many fears, but I haven’t seen one yet that I, as a White person in this country, have not been living with as a daily occurrence, for my whole life.

You want to know what it’s like to be White in America? Well, you’ll never know completely, but let me give you an idea—let’s start out by talking about some of the things you have expressed fear about following the Zimmerman acquittal:

Fear#1: Non-Black people will be able to kill Black children without justified provocation and get away with less than they deserve or with help from public officials:

White people have understood this fear for a very long time now—and it is a legitimate one for us. Our children are dangerous as victims to the criminal justice system. When they are harmed, those who live their lives and make their fortunes denigrating us are afraid to let anyone know that White people can be victims.

Instead, they prefer to shuttle the case away, and slap the perp on the wrist so that non-White people won’t be offended that any White person had the audacity to be brutalized, raped, or murdered by a non-White angel.

Fear#2: Walking home Black may become a crime:

Well, walking home White has been a crime for some time now. All over this country, Whites know we must be careful where we go, because if we don’t carefully observe the unwritten rules of society, we risk losing our lives for being White “where we don’t belong”. Just a walk home White can end in death.

Fear#3: Young Black people will not be able to wear or carry certain things without being attacked:

We White people know all about this. Whites all over this country know that there are unwritten rules that apply only to them, and not to non-white people. These rules dictate that if they wear certain things which offend or make non-White people uncomfortable, they stand a good chance of being jumped, or even killed.

Fear#4: Non-Black people will be emboldened to commit crimes against Black people:

The emboldening of anti-White crime by blatant shows of anti-White hatred that go uncriticized and even reinforced by the justice system is something that is a real danger to us as White Americans. Racially motivated crime against innocent White victims that goes uncondemned as such, and may lead to even bolder victimization in the future, is an ever present threat to White lives and safety.

Fear#5: Non-Black Juries will acquit attackers of Blacks for racial reasons:

The fear—no the fact—that non-Black juries will refuse to convict those who commit crimes against White people is a fact of life for us.

Fear#6: Stereotyping and Profiling Blacks will increasingly lead to unnecessary deaths:

Unjust stereotypes which paint all Whites as dangerous, hateful, and seeking to harm non-Whites are an everyday wound for every White person in this country. Every one of us, everyday of our lives, is summarily stereotyped, profiled, judged, and dismissed as a “racist”, evil, bigoted, exploitive, and uncaring person—and judged as worthless and worthy of extermination—all by the color of our skin. And, it leads to innocent, unarmed White people being attacked and murdered all over this country in cold blood.

Fear#7: Being constantly seen as a problem to be dealt with:

Think you have a problem of being seen as a problem? You should just be White for a day!!! All throughout our lives, from our tenderest years, to the twilight of our old age, we are constantly told that we are what’s wrong with this country; We are the problem not only in this country, but in the world, and if we would just die off, allow ourselves to be replaced by non-Whites, start hating ourselves, we would do the country and the whole world a favor.

Fear#8: If Black people aren’t careful to constantly tip-toe around non-Blacks, so as not to make them uncomfortable/offend them, they could get themselves killed:

Whites live with this nightmare turned reality, everyday. We know that we must always watch where we go, and what we say, because any statement of pride in our own race, any expression of our opinion that a non-White finds remotely offensive for the most trivial of reasons, or even the most innocent of acts or statements, could land us in the hospital, maybe in a coffin—certainly will land us in some sort of serious verbal attack, or lose us a job, etc.

Fear#9: Black life is not valued as much as the lives of other people:

As White people, we have long since realized that our lives just don’t matter—all that matters is non-White “feelings”. Time and again our lives are disrupted by slander and lies—and nobody cares. Our lives are put on hold by terrifying and cruel crimes of violence—and nobody cares. Our lives our taken from us—and, nobody cares.

Our lives are worthless to those in the non-White community, and self-centered traitors in government, who care only about themselves, money, power, and ambition, and to the media people who care for nothing but their twisted, hateful agenda which teaches that White life is worthless. When we die, we are invisible, unpitied sacrifices. We are an “unprotected class”.

Fear#10: There is a systematic mistreatment and disadvantage faced by Black people in this country:

Whatever any Black person may think, we, as white people, are the single most systematically discriminated against group in this country. We face this disadvantage at every stage of our lives: from kindergarten and on up through our school years where we are degraded and torn down to instill racial guild and shame, to college admissions, to the job market, and freedom of speech in work environments, to a justice system that sees our victimization as a threat, and our pride as a crime. We face a society hostile to Whiteness every day of our lives.

That, is what it means to be White in America. That is what we as White people, must put up with everyday. And, so much more. Starting to see a little bit now? Starting to see the flicker of your own hypocrisy? I hope so. Because you will never know, never bear, the full brunt of what it means to be White in this country—to be constantly denied every right of identity, and torn down, degraded, treated like trash—you can’t, because nothing along the lines of what is being done to us, has ever been done to any other race. But, you can understand maybe a little better.

Next time you hear someone offer “White privilege” as a genuine concept you will be able to help race-relations in this country by pointing out that the only privileges White people have in this country are the privileges of being slandered, accused, and blamed without any chance at self-defense, denied rights without any recognition, harmed without any outcry, and killed without any remorse.

Thank you for your time, the way you respond, will show me the content of your character. If you have a shred of integrity and humanity in your soul you will admit that this is the biggest race problem America has. If you call me a racist, you are judging me by the color of my skin and not the content of my character (hypocritical for you). And you are contributing to the problem.

Let’s have a truly honest discussion about race in this country. Goodness knows we need it. Black America, this is my privilege. Are you still so sure you want it?

Marina Orwell & commenters #racist #sexist orwellsdaughter.wordpress.com

Unfortunately, I only infrequently see non-porn/misogynist searches leading to my blog. This is because internet traffic is comprised near-exclusively of Walking Penises (Doormats with Holes are busy providing all manner of free labor — in addition to working as many, or more hours outside the home as their lazy, good for nothing dickwad counterparts). Since dickwads are usually busy searching for the most vile forms of violence against women that they can find, non-misogynistic searches rarely show up.

Random searches for 2016:

“white men hate white women” (I hope this gentle searcher found what she was looking for, especially since I’m the only White woman telling it like it is about the “white” male & his relationship to jews & other nonwhite males).

when his iq is smaller then his penis” (no comment).

“black and white picture with prince and 2 women naked” (You meant to search for “Prince Rogers Nelson and 2 midget whores” — Da Little Prince was only 5 feet tall).

“did prince nelson wear contacts” (this is the kind of thing lemmings want to know — details about a non-talent midget who “sang” about luvving his own penis so much that he imagined women wanted to be raped by him. Oh, & yes the little faggo-nig did wear colored contacts — so he could look “mulatto” instead of straight-ahead Afreekin — like his jew masters directed him).

“will niggers ever stop complaining” (I hope that this gentle searcher found a lot of information about the Negro problem on my blog. In case s/he didn’t: No, they will never stop complaining. Nor will they stop raping, murdering, thieving, & otherwise adding zero benefit to society. They only become fatter, uglier, more demanding, & dumber — hard to believe, but even with Whitey’s donation to the Negro gene pool — making nearly all Amurrikan “blacks” actually mulatto — they are the only mud race incapable of learning, or of feeling normal human emotions).

(alabasterass)
Re Neverending White Male Privilege
Thank you Marina for sticking up for us even tho white males have done nothing to help white women ever. When white males report black violence toward white females they always do it in the context of making their anti black points, not in the context of giving a crap about white females. Sometimes they even blatantly state that she deserved it because she was a “mudshark” even when there is no evidence of this.
I used to think that white women were disloyal to white men, mostly because of the very loud and very prevalent voices of women haters on the internet. They always claim that white women are disloyal but I’ve yet to see one white man on the internet who shows anything but disloyalty toward white women. Disloyalty, in fact, would be their kindest lack of positive emotion. Most have thinly veiled rage against white women and don’t even care that low intelligent black animals take this as an OK to do even more violence to white women.
I can see that the white male believes that he just deserves loyalty, respect, etc because he just does because he’s a white male. He still thinks he is king and I even think many dig seeing everyone else join in the hate toward white women. I even see that so called white nationalists say they mate with nonwhite females because they are white males and deserve to do whatever they want while women should be “put in cages.” For what it’s worth I hate the woman hating white nationalists more than even the black rapist apes. You really do have to wonder if these young white males have IQ’s in the same range as black ones. Or even lower.

(Orwell's Daughter)
alabaster: Thanks for your thoughtful comments.

This is what a world gone mad looks/feels like. It is a balkanized zoo where the most civilized (committing the least violent crime) are the only ones who are forced, against our will (aka “civil rights”) to have to live among those who hunt us down. White people don’t have any rights.

What’s better is that most White people believe we “deserve” this. The libtards measure “hate” by the “feelings” brought on by 50 years of constant jew media anti-White pounding. White libtards cannot fathom that “hate” can actually be measured — by the outrageously out of proportion NEGRO ON WHITE CRIME.

(AthenaTheBrave)
Hope you don’t mind me dropping a hot steaming pile of link on this here page:

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/the-bullies-of-black-lives-matter/article30746157/

“will niggers ever stop complaining” the answer is a definitive no, even in a huge liberal city with a BLACK POLICE CHIEF, during the Pride Parade after a “tragedy” in Amurrika, after they’ve cowed the organizers of said parade into obeying their list of bugfuck insane demands, made them the leaders of the parade, and halted the glorified street fair for over 30 minutes. If these fuckugly subhumans were in the US, they’d be shot execution-style for pulling this, and not necessarily by police, either. Fuck each and every one of them with a rusted chainsaw. I actually feel really sorry for the white gays who had to deal with this, ’cause at least some of them are funny and interesting.

Tobias Langdon #transphobia #wingnut #racist #pratt #dunning-kruger unz.com

image

Sex and race are, to the left, mere social constructs, abstract systems of delusion and injustice that can be overturned by human will and social engineering. It follows, then, that leftists will support and celebrate men who reject the social construct of sex and claim to be women. And leftists do support and celebrate such men.

Triumph of the Trannies

It also follows that leftists will support and celebrate Whites who reject the social construct of race and claim to be Blacks. But leftists don’t support and celebrate such Whites. Quite the contrary. While Bruce Jenner, a man claiming to be a woman, is worshipped and rewarded, Rachel Dolezal, a White claiming to be a Black, is ridiculed and punished. Steve Sailer and others have drawn attention to this contradiction, but I don’t think they’ve properly explained it.

Why do leftists cheer when men cross the border between the sexes, but jeer when Whites try to cross the border between the races?

I pose those questions deliberately in that form to draw out the links between the left’s love of transgenderism and the left’s love of open borders. The Jewish libertarian Murray Rothbard (1926–95) described this aspect of leftist ideology very well in this passage of an otherwise long-winded and boring essay:

The egalitarian revolt against biological reality, as significant as it is, is only a subset of a deeper revolt: against the ontological structure of reality itself, against the “very organization of nature”; against the universe as such. At the heart of the egalitarian left is the pathological belief that there is no structure of reality; that all the world is a tabula rasa that can be changed at any moment in any desired direction by the mere exercise of human will — in short, that reality can be instantly transformed by the mere wish or whim of human beings. (Egalitarianism as a Revolt Against Nature, Modern Age, Fall 1973)

Rothbard was right in general about leftism, but failed to explain that highly significant exception: why does the “exercise of human will” allow Bruce Jenner and others to become women, but not allow Rachel Dolezal and others to become Blacks?

Sex and race are both aspects of reality, but the left believes that only one of those aspects “can be instantly transformed by the mere wish or whim of human beings.” Why so? I would explain it by supplementing Rothbard’s explanation. Yes, he’s right when he says the left have a magical belief in the reality-transforming power of “human will,” but he doesn’t discuss what happens when there is a clash of wills.

The high and the low

Let’s look at transgenderism first. Men like Bruce Jenner and Jonathan Yaniv (pictured) have “willed” that men can become women and must enjoy unrestricted access to all female spaces. At the same time, some women — the so-called Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminists or TERFs — have “willed” that men can’t become women and must keep out of female spaces. There is a clash of wills that is settled, for the Left, by the status of the opposing sides. In leftist eyes, the men have higher status than the women, which is why the men’s will prevails and the women’s will is rejected. But hold on, you might be thinking: How can the men have higher status than the women in leftist eyes? It’s easy: the transgender men have cleverly aligned themselves not with men in general, who are indeed of lower status than women, but with homosexual men, who are of higher status than women.

Trangendered men are part of the “LBGTQ+ community,” which lifts them above women in the leftist hierarchy. Take Jonathan Yaniv, the perverted and probably Jewish male, who claims to be a woman and has been suing female cosmeticians in Canada for refusing to wax his fully intact male genitals. If Yaniv spoke the truth, he would admit that he is a heterosexual male who seeks perverted sexual pleasure by passing himself off as a woman and receiving Brazilian waxes or entering female toilets to share tampon tips with under-age girls, etc. Obviously, then, Yaniv can’t admit the truth. Heterosexual men are wicked in leftist eyes and are well below women in the leftist hierarchy. Heterosexual men definitely cannot pass themselves off as women in pursuit of perverted sexual thrills.

Actual authentic lesbians

Yaniv and other “trans-women” must therefore align themselves with homosexuals to pass leftist purity-tests. As trans-women they claim to be members of a sexual minority, which triggers the leftist love of minority-worship. Indeed, Yaniv and some others go further than simply claiming to be women: they claim to be actual authentic lesbians. A pinned tweet at Yaniv’s Twitter account states that he is “One proud lesbian. I’ll never give up fighting for human rights equality. #LGBTQoftwitter.” Yaniv isn’t a lesbian, of course. Real lesbians — that is, real women who are sexually attracted to other real women — quite rightly reject fake lesbians like him, so the fake lesbians exploit leftist ideology again and accuse real lesbians of bigotry and hate.

Feminism has the concept of the “glass ceiling,” whereby women are unjustly prevented by sexist men from reaching the highest positions in politics, business and academia. Inspired by this, the fake lesbians have invented the concept of the “cotton ceiling,” whereby men like Yaniv are unjustly prevented by real lesbians from removing the underwear of said lesbians and having sex with them. Here is a trans-lesbian activist lecturing a sceptical TERF (i.e. Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminist for those not up on the latest jargon) on the injustices of the cotton ceiling:

Trans women are female. When our female-ness and womanhood is denied, as you keep doing repeatedly, that is transphobic and transmisogynist. As I said earlier, all people’s desires are influenced by an intersection of cultural messages that determine those desires. Cultural messages that code trans women’s bodies as male are transphobic, and those messages influence people’s desires. So cis queer women who are attracted to other queer women may not view trans women as viable sexual partners because they have internalized the message that trans women are somehow male.

The comparison to what cis males say also makes no sense. What trans women are saying is that we are women, and thus should be considered women sexually, and thus be considered viable partners for women who are attracted to women. What cis males are saying is that queer women shouldn’t be exclusively attracted to women, which is completely different. (The Cotton Ceiling? Really?, Femonade blog, 13th March 2012)

It’s not “completely different,” of course. In both cases, people with penises are “saying” (and willing) that real lesbians should have sex with them. In both cases, real lesbians would be encountering the male genitals of real men. But the trans-activist believes in an act of verbal transubstantiation whereby a trans-lesbian possesses a “female penis” that, despite all appearances, is “completely different” to the nasty and objectionable penis of a “cis male.”

Aspects of religious psychology

I use the term “transubstantiation” deliberately. It’s a term from Catholic theology that refers to the supernatural process whereby wafers and wine transform into the flesh and blood of Christ during the celebration of Holy Eucharist by a priest. No physical or scientific test can detect this transformation, and to all appearances the wafers and wine remain unchanged. But traditionalist Catholics will insist that the wafers and wine are now truly Christ’s flesh and blood. If you disagree, you’re probably safe nowadays, but you wouldn’t have been in the past. It was very unwise to openly deny, let alone ridicule, transubstantiation in Catholic nations during the Middle Ages. And disagreements over the concept were central to the murderous hatreds of the Reformation. Those who believed in transubstantiation got very angry when it was denied.

This anger, which is part of the odium theologicum, is an important aspect of religious psychology, whether overt or covert — leftism can in fact be explained as a mutation of Christianity and Judaism. Overt and covert religions gain power by demanding belief in things that defy everyday reality, because such belief is difficult and requires a greater emotional investment. When we invest more in a belief, we have more incentive to protect it more strongly. And it is precisely because concepts like transubstantiation and the “female penis” are absurd that they are powerful. When we have an emotional investment in something we can’t prove, we react strongly when it is denied or ridiculed. That applies even more when we ourselves are subconsciously aware or afraid that our beliefs are baseless or false. Crushing external heresies can be a way of stilling internal doubts.

The “female penis” vs the “unisex brain”

And so religion and other forms of ideology can gain power by their contradictions and absurdities. However, in the clash between transgenderism and feminism, both sides believe in absurdities: the trannies insist on the concept of the female penis, just as the feminists insist on the concept of the “unisex brain,” namely, that there is no genuine difference between male and female brains. These two concepts are both biologically absurd: there is no such thing as a female penis, but there is such a thing as a female brain. However, if transgenderism and feminism are both powered by absurdities, why have trannies been winning the battle over the TERFs? Well, it’s partly because the trannies have the bigger, and therefore better, absurdities. For example, the “female penis” is an obvious absurdity, the “unisex brain” is much less so. Penises are out in the open, after all, whereas brains are hidden behind the skull.

And there is a continuum between a typically male brain and a typically female brain that doesn’t exist between male genitals and female genitals in the vast majority of cases. The psychological differences between men and women are a question of averages and tendencies, but the physical differences are generally stark and obvious (inter-sex individuals are rare). A certain group of trannies also have the stronger male will-to-power and love of battle, which is another reason they are winning the battle with lesbians. All this explains why the left supports and celebrates trannies as they cross the border between male and female. As a sexual minority, they have higher status than ordinary women. As a novel and exhibitionist sexual minority, they also have higher status than lesbians, who also have less will-to-power.

Better than Black

Indeed, as I pointed out in “Power to the Perverts!,” transgenderism has allowed some White heterosexual men to leap above the Black-Jewish lesbian feminist Linda Bellos in the leftist hierarchy. The White men are “transgender” and Bellos, although Black, is a TERF. In current leftism, transgender trumps TERF. Leftists therefore support the border-abolishing White men and not the border-erecting Black woman.

However, leftists would instantly support Bellos if those White men were claiming to be Black rather than female. Leftists want the border between male and female abolished, but not the border between Black and White. Why so? Again I would argue that higher and lower status settle the clash of wills. Rachel Dolezal “willed” that she was Black, while Blacks “willed” that she wasn’t. Dolezal was trying to abolish a border, Blacks were trying to maintain one, so a naïve reading of leftism would say that leftists should support “trans-racialists” like Dolezal just as they support transgenderists like Bruce Jenner. But leftists didn’t support Dolezal, and Blacks easily won the battle of wills. The border between Black and White stayed up, and Dolezal was ridiculed and punished, despite being more convincing as a Black than most transgenderists ever are as women.

{Submitter’s note: Langdon rants on and on… see the source link if you’re really interested about the rest of it}

Ginnar #racist stormfront.org

Don't like us? Do without us!
Think we are racists and haters? Do without us!
Think we are intolerant and biased? Do without us!
Think we are a disease and anti-Semitic? Do without us!
Believe we are unfair and stingy with the fruits of our culture? Do without us!

Don't make excuses to stay. After all these years of complaining these complainers forfeit their right to live in white countries.

We say to all those non-European factions shrilling about our unfairness, intolerance and racism - the perfect solution to your problems with white people is simple. Do without us. Leave. Go somewhere that does not have all this hate and racism you claim we have. Such places should be plentiful since only white countries hold the distinction of being biased, prejudiced, unfair, intolerant and hate filled racists.

Will Asians treat Blacks better than Whites do?
Will Blacks treat Asians better than Whites do?
Will Hispanics treat Blacks and Asians better than Whites do?
Will Jews treat Asians, Blacks, Latinos, Muslims better than White people do? Will they treat Jews better than white people do? If they are more tolerant, less prejudiced, more generous, more fair than white people we say - go for it. Why hang around in white nations feeling oppressed and hated? These accusations about white countries are not unknown around the world. Yet, millions of non-whites are pouring in to white countries to live among us so-called racists so they can feel oppressed and hated and gripe about us. More Jews live in Christian America than anywhere. Every anti-Semitic white country has Jews. (The more power Jews have in our countries the more anti-Semitic (anti-Jewish) we become and that is the truth. When we find ourselves placed in a position where our sons fight and die in wars for the Jews and families must be against the survival of our race in order have jobs and earn a living you can bet we become anti Semitic.)

These non-white people want the things we produce, but they don't want us. Life doesn't work that way. Somebody is missing a card in their deck. You can't get the golden egg without the goose that lays it. These folks want us to take them in, coddle them, take care of their every need, but get out of the way. We can't. We are the ones who lay the golden eggs. You can't have one without the other.

But these whiners can do something about their sensitive feelings. Do without us. Don't make excuses to stay. If we are as bad as claimed there is no excuse to stay. No one has to put up with us. They NEVER had to. That's the unreal part. No one ever had to put up with the White population. Not one month, not one week, not one day, not one second. Thus, skip the woeful tales as excuses to stay.

DO WITHOUT US. Just like you poured into our countries, leave! Pour yourselves OUT. From now on go away, leave and take your complaints with you, do without us.

New Sauce boy #fundie mmo-champion.com

It has been getting out of hand from the beginning. Right when they started to put black people's lives on a pedestal and act like they're above everyone else like they're the most important people in the world and acting like they deserve something just because some black person was shot. Then it really got out of hand when they used this black lives matter bullshit as an excuse to destroy and pillage their own fucking town like a bunch of savage raiders. All because of some guy who 90% of the people involved don't even know. They only protest because it's a fellow brutha. When a black guy kills a white guy or even a family over a few thousand dollars/drugs/something stupid do you see anyone going out with signs like "white lives matter" and protesting and rioting all over? No. The only people that are affected are the friends and families of the victim(s).

The whole "BLM" shit is stupid and everyone involved are a bunch of idiots who don't even know what the fuck they're really protesting for. All they know is that some white guy killed a black guy and because of that it's racism all of a sudden. Who cares what the black guy did the cop shot him! The police are all corrupt! RIOT!! But whenever a black guy kills another black guy it's no fucking problem. Just another day in the neighborhood. Black lives don't matter in those situations right? That's why people say it's only racist if a white person is involved. White on black crime it's a international issue. Black on white crime, who the fuck cares? It's just another white guy, no biggie.

Also while on the subject people talk about stereotypes like how black people are always seen as criminals. Watch the news and tell me how many crimes were done by a black person versus a white person. Then come back and tell me that the stereotypes are unjustified and racist. Then you can wonder why cops are so on edge. Doesn't really justify their actions but as a human being can you really blame them for being scared and valuing their lives? Cops aren't emotionless drones. They want to go back home to their families too.

Michael the Black Man #fundie honestfact.com

A few highlights from the website Honestfact.com, the website of a black Trump supporter and former Yahweh ben Yahweh cult member Michael Symonette

"The Real K K K Slave Masters Revealed, 2Thess.2:1-11 & they are CHEROKEE Indians (Hidden Babylonians). The reason GOD? YAHWEH chose TRUMP to be President is to be the White & Black Man's DELIVERER from the Babylon, like the Gentile King CYRUS, Isa.45:1-6!"

"ISIS & HILLARY RACE WAR PLOT TO KILL ALL BLACK & WHITE WOMAN OF AMERICA WITH MS-13 REV. 12:1-10.
Cherokee Democrats & Cherokee Republicans Like Flake & McCain Block Trump 2Thess.2:1-5 says must be revealed and voted out of the way. Make Cherokees & the Indians Pay Taxes & Save America economically because Deut. 21:17-19 says if you harm someone you help them get back on their feet. Now their back on their feet make them pay taxes."

"Republican Senators blocking Trump are Cherokees & Mormons & are infiltraters in the Rep. Senate like McCain to block Trump & Muller are coming down with Great Wrath because their wicked time to block good policy is short, Rev.12:10 & Dan.8:25!

Proof that tho ur mixed with these Racist Cherokees ur not them because ur Taxed & Regulated etc. & they're not, they hate black & white people perpetually Eze.35:5 & Gen.36:1-5!"

"Gentiles & Blacks were in America 1st. before Cherokees & we don't owe them Reparations & even if so u only here help them until back on their feet Deut.21:17-18 & Rev.1lania Trump. Slavs hate Slovians!"

"Slavs are Canaanites & are not Slavic/Slovenian Gentiles like our wonderful 1st lady Malania Trump. Slavs hate Slovians!"

"Republican Senators who're against Trump's HealthCare Policy & all of his Policies are Mormon Cherokee's. They are the Racist that believe White Gentiles & Black Republicans are Idiots & are not worthy to Rule"

"Black & White Americans are the Real HEBREWS, (Hos.4:6), Owned America & were in the Americas before THE CHEROKEE INDIANS!CHEROKEES took the Americas by Violence but now Claim Reparations from our Taxes for America they took from Us."

"Well Cherokees are healed for long enough now & must now pay TAXES & not get special Rights over us. This will HEAL America's Debt & all problems. Cherokees are DRUNK with the Blood (Tax Dollars) of the White & Black Man. No Conquering people ever paid Taxes to a People they Conquered while somehow we're paying Taxes to them. Keeping us so Poor & Regulated we Abort our Kids (fearing Child Support) while giving Cherokees $20,000 a month for Life per Child WOW! TRUMP stop unfair Business Competition"

Fading Light #racist stormfront.org

White people are obsessed with morality, compassion, altruism, and fairness. Of all the races that have screwed over other people in their own interests at some point in their history (which means all of them), ours is the only race that seriously worries it might have been the wrong thing to do. Haiti doesn't lose any sleep over genociding all the Whites off the island. Asians don't get down on their knees and apologize to Europe for unleashing a plague on them during a siege that subsequently wiped out 33% of the population. Semites certainly aren't lining up to apologize for taking the Middle East from us. No, only Whites do things like that.

Liberals would not be able to sell movies and television to White people if those programs didn't have some sort of moral underpinning to them. When we see Star Trek, the Blacks and Asians and so on all have to act like White people. Showing these races the way they really are would not allow them to live harmoniously together, and would not make for good ethical viewing.

Ironically, the Blacks complain about this. The characters don't seem real to them. Of course, they are correct; that's NOT what Blacks are really like. They are not intelligent, respectful, dignified, and driven by ethics. Blacks see the anomaly. White Nationalists see it. White liberals cannot.

I just find it interesting that Whiteness, as an ethical foundation, has to remain even in movies about--and starring a majority of--non-Whites. Whiteness is the desired state of being even for Black people. It is the state that asks profound questions, puts moral questions above personal gain. Searches the soul--something that again seems uniquely White.

Teutonic Knight #sexist incels.co

[Historypill] Why the Western white men have become such cucks

It's a bit long text but I can't put it any shorter.

The men that I have in mind: White heterosexual middle class and working class men from Western Europe and Northern America. Why have they become such cucks?

These men have had a very specific cultural and social history. They have been conditioned through centuries to obey their elite and to respect the hierarchy. First during the medieval and post-medieval feudal system. Then in the 19th century, these feudal states transformed into secular nations. The non-aristocratic men of all classes were technically given liberty but at the same time, they now had to follow a new religion of being loyal to the nation and its institutions, its symbols, its cultural and industrial elite. This was furthered by secularism which removed the power religion to a large extent and separated it from the state, so the state became THE religion.

These regular white men had to work hard in factory, support their families, go to wars for their nations and were expected to be blindly loyal to the Institutions of the State and its Law. A modern ideal of manliness was born out of this that among other things included the idea that you should accept all the hardships ("men don't cry", men aren't supposed to show emotions etc.) and that you should always blame yourself for your failures, because you live in this wonderful nation that provides you with everything. This is the mentality from which the incels are judged today (basically as a man, you should never complain, and if you have a problem, it's your own fault).

During the 19th century, these Western European nation-states became the dominant superpowers and controlled almost the entire world. The white Western men suddenly became an aristocracy of their own in the global perspective, fueled by the ideas of the white racial superiority, and they started to see themselves as such. The white race as a whole adopted the aristocratic mentality that they are the noble men who have to spread civilization all over the planet (the idea of the white man's burden). The white men now became the gentlemen, the white knights, the nobility of the world.

Meanwhile, the Western society started "liberating" all kinds of "vulnerable" groups from the supposed "oppression". After the WW2, this process was intensified and was systematically directed by the institutions of the Western states. The Western white men were expected not only to continue to respect their regime and its institutions and its new ideology, but also to stoically accept all the insults and provocations from all the feminists, gays, degenerate "artists" and other groups dedicated to shame the white men and their past. The white men were expected to bear all this and they did because they still saw themselves as some sort of gentlemen and aristocracy that is "above this". It's basically like the concept of noblesse oblige where the nobility is expected to be held to a different code of conduct than the rest of society and to be generous and benevolent, not lowering itself to the conduct of the plebeian lower classes. This is basically what you have in the society today, one code of conduct for the white men (you have to be liberal, respectful, humble, work hard, don't complain) and another for everyone else (you can complain, be loud, insult). White men were raised with this code of chivalry for a long time and have integrated these ideas about protecting the weak. They repressed their manly impulses which would mandate them to lash out and respond aggressively.

This is why the middle class and working class white men allowed all of this post-WWII feminism, LGBT, sexual liberation and other degeneracy to flourish. They believed that they still held a position of power and that they have a responsibility to serve the Western civilization (which became synonymous with liberalism, capitalism, feminism and 'freedom'). So they not only accepted all the degeneracy and all the insults, but even became proud of it and bragged to the entire world about what kind of freedom they have. They were doing it from a position of power, feeling as if it's their duty to protect the weak. This why you have all these manly men in Western armies bragging about fighting against the Muslims or other non-Westerners for "muh Western freedom" while their Western women are whoring themselves out at home. They're actually proud of this degeneracy. They see it as a sign of power and progress. Ever wondered why the American army doesn't have any equivalent to Muslim nasheeds? Because for the Western men, listening to some degenerate rap is their nasheed as it symbolizes the alleged power of Western liberation and global supremacy.

The thing is, all these vulnerable groups that the regular white men are supposed to protect and bow down to in fact aren't weak at all. They have been systematically protected by the increasingly more powerful State and its Institutions (that the white men are blindly loyal to) for decades. The West gives this groups like women, LGBT, immigrants etc. special privileges like the old feudal kings used to do in the past, so that in turn, they can expect their support and loyalty. This is basically what we have in the West right now, these "weak" "vulnerable" groups serve the system, they endorse it, they want stronger state, stronger institutions, stronger police repression (at the excuse of protect this vulnerable groups) etc. And the system gladly accepts their demands.

It's very interesting to note that the feminists never really opposed the white-knightism and chivalry of the patriarchical Western culture. They're perfectly fine with the middle class and working class white men thinking that they hold this alleged position of power where they have to help women. They don't want to convince them into true equality because if there was true equality, they wouldn't need these white knights, and the white knights would no longer help them. The feminists are just promoting a specific type of ideology that tries to strengthen the system and its ideological norms and which tries to humiliate the white men while at the same time giving them a false impression to these men that they're actually being noble and strong.

The white Western men are still too blind to see all of this. They still believe in the old conduct of chivalry, either in the form of being a left wing cuck, or a right wing cuck. They both very similar in mentality when it comes to protecting "muh freedom" (which in reality just means giving more power to the state which gives you this "freedom" and protects it). Both left and right wing cucks are blindly loyal to the West and see it as the peak of all human civilization and progress.

The attitude towards racism is very similar in the West too in terms of white-knightism. As a white male you're supposed to formally criticize every form of white racism, but this comes from a specific position of power as well. As a white male, you're also expected to be much more liberal than a non-white male. Non-whites can get away with certain anti-liberal ideas but the whites can't (eg. Muslims can be much more radical than the white Christians who get persecuted for the slightest offense). This is because as a white man, you're supposed to be a gentleman and protect the "weaker" races. This is literally what this so-called liberal "anti-racism" is all about. It's not about equality of the races, it's about white men being expected to be cucks and white knights for other races. So it's essentially racist in itself, although it doesn't really benefit the majority of the white race (and arguably it doesn't help the non-white races either).

Note, I'm talking about middle class and lower class white men here. There are whites who do perfectly fine in the West now, the rich oligarchic elite which holds the power, the politicians, judges etc. They hold a similar position to the aristocracy and clergy in the feudal systems, they're the ones who are actually above all of those things and laugh at the pathetic white peasants who work like idiots for this system while being humiliated and insulted by all the privileged "weak and vulnerable" groups at the same time.

What keeps the regular white men going? Four things: 1) century-long blind loyalty to the state, the church (the churches have unfortunately become too westernized and weakened to stand up to the anti-Christian secular states), the institutions, the legal system, the hierarchy etc. 2) an utopian belief that they can ascend to being the elite themselves. No matter how bad the situation is for them, they still have some weird hope that they can get a normal family, earn big money etc. This comes from the American capitalist mentality of pursuit of happiness, American dream (this mentality is now prevalent all over the West). 3) Relative economic prosperity which still enables all kinds of copes. The illusion of the mighty West that will continue to dominate the world through science and technology and solve everything. Addiction to the materialistic world and hedonism. 4) Fear of going against the Western idea of manliness where as a man, you're not supposed to cry and complain. This is further fueled by the secular humanism which promotes the idea that you are the master of your own destiny and if you have a personal problem, you have to find a solution yourself and solve it.

Incels are a problem for the regime because they have opted out of all this and don't share this mentality (other than maybe what I described under the number 3). This is also where this obsession with painting incels as "frustrated white men" (when there are in fact plenty of non-white incels) comes from. The regime fears that the white men will abandon it and stopped being the obeying little peasants. They want the white men to continue thinking that they're the gentlemen and noble white knights of this system because once the local Western white men stop being productive, it's pretty much the end for the West as we know it. That's why they want to shame the white men who turn incel.

The end of the West will come either way. This society has nothing more to offer (culturally, philosophically), it has clearly degenerated way beyond the point of no return. While not necessarily blackpilled, people are more and more cynical, they don't want to serve their nations as much as they used to (harder and harder to find people who want to serve in the army), this whole nihilism that the West promoted in regards to religion and traditionalism is now backfiring and is starting to question their own liberal ideology as well. Incels are simply a sign of things that are about to come as the men abandon the Western ideals of manliness.

white_usa_ #racist stormfront.org

No, we are not recruiting liberals in this thread. Instead, we are transforming them into White Nationalists by eliminating the effects of brainwashing perpetrated by perfidious Jews.

The so-called ‘racial equality’ is a weapon Jews are using to destroy white societies.

To liberate white minds from the effects of Jewish brainwashing we must first destroy Jewish egalitarian ideology.

In this thread we expose ‘racial equality’ as a gigantic lie by demonstrating that nonwhites belong to genetically inferior races.

White liberals read this and realize that they were gullible, wrong on all these issues and worst of all, that they supported the destruction of their own people. Shame on them!

Fortunately, armed with the knowledge they absorb in this thread liberals figure everything out and change their horrific behavior: ’I will no longer be a race traitor! I am now a WN!’

Consequently, we are not recruiting liberals, but WNs.

This is how it works.

image

We first show this disturbing image to white liberals and ask them: Does this creature look like an ape or human?

Well, “it” has features of both apes and humans because aboriginals represent a transitional species between apes and humans. Technically speaking they are sub-human or Untermensch.

Everybody, including liberals agree with this assessment, because it is self-evident.

Okay, then we ask liberals: Do you think that only 1-2 million aboriginals in Australia are profoundly subhuman, but the remaining 7 billion+ ‘people’ are miraculously all at the same level of evolutionary development?

Of course not! Pigmies and bushmen are also subhuman. What about the Bantus? Perhaps borderline human. Maybe? No?

Cross that—Sub-Saharan Africans, particularly Congolese are also subhuman!

Then we discuss Dravidians that are vastly genetically inferior but not subhuman. Indonesians? The same thing.

So liberals finally realize that various races, subraces and mongrels are all part of a comprehensive racial hierarchy.

Racial hierarchy looks like a pyramid, with subhumans at the bottom. As you climb the pyramid, nonwhite ethnicities have ever higher percentage of humanity.

At the very top resides genetically vastly superior white race!

But make no mistake: All nonwhites, without exception, are genetically inferior beings!

So a white liberal reads this and goes: ‘I get it! If nonwhites are genetically inferior, then we must not mingle with them, because they will degrade our racially superior Aryan genetic pool with their retrograde genetics, right?’

That’s right! We don’t want them anywhere near our race, because their genetic inferiority transforms them into racial parasites. Nonwhites are absolutely worthless to us!

For example, I bet you that 10-20 white liberals reading this are nodding their heads in agreement: This makes perfect sense! Lying Jews have managed to fool me, but now I get it!

So they join our ranks.

This is the template we will use going forward to win this fight and liberate our people!

Makes sense?

Christopher Jackson #racist martynemko.blogspot.com

[[A public school teacher recalls what it was like for him to teach black students.]

What about black boys and white girls? No one is supposed to notice this or talk about it but it is glaringly obvious: Black boys are obsessed with white girls. I’ve witnessed the following drama countless times. A black boy saunters up to a white girl. The cocky black dances around her, not really in a menacing way. It’s more a shuffle than a threat. As he bobs and shuffles he asks, “When you gonna go wit’ me?”

There are two kinds of reply. The more confident white girl gets annoyed, looks away from the black and shouts, “I don’t wanna go out with you!” The more demure girl will look at her feet and mumble a polite excuse but ultimately say no.

There is only one response from the black boy: “You racis’.” Many girls—all too many—actually feel guilty because they do not want to date blacks. Most white girls at my school stayed away from blacks, but a few, particularly the ones who were addicted to drugs, fell in with them.

There is something else that is striking about blacks. So many of them seem to have no sense of romance, of falling in love. What brings men and women together is sex, pure and simple, and there is a crude openness about this. There are many degenerate whites, of course, but some of my white students were capable of real devotion and tenderness, emotions that seemed absent from most blacks—especially the boys.

Deborah Du Randt #fundie discerningtheworld.com

Obama to Create God’s Kingdom on Earth.

Apostolic (pentecostal) church in Greenville, SC – Oct, 2007. (Minister, Ron Carpenter)

Obama says to the church congregation, “I am confident that we can create a kingdom right here on earth!”

In the Black Liberation Theology of Obama’s church the millennial kingdom will be a real physical theocracy and comes after the black messiah leads the destruction of white society, America and the traditional Christian church.

————-

Obama Implies that he is The Black Savior.

Obama states that his salvation depends on collective salvation of the black community. The doctrine (Black Liberation Theology) holds that collective salvation of the black community is achieved by confronting white society as the Antichrist in the End Times and destroying it, bringing on a new age and transforming earthly society into an utopian millennial kingdom, which will be a physical and historical event, not a spiritual event.

Cerebrator #racist city-data.com

(from a thread asking whether anyone should use the N-word)

GENERALLY speaking--repeat that: GENERALLY, because we all have to walk on egg shells and constantly provide disclaimers in this feminized, hyperindividualistic, PC age--blacks and other non-whites do not like white people--actually they GENERALLY hate white people--so I don't understand why whites feel the need to handle them with kid gloves, linguistically or otherwise.

(later in the same thread)

You don't understand why it's hard to understand the concept?

Maybe this will help: Blacks and non-whites, with the help of their liberal stooge enforcers, have been playing the semantics game for about a hundred years!

If I have it correct, the word ****** comes from the neutral word niger, that is, a word with not intended for any emotional effect. People used the word ****** simply as a term for black people, with no negative connotation at all. This offended blacks. So then they were referred to as Negros, another neutral word. Then this became insulting. Now they are called African Americans or blacks, but it might be a matter of time before they and the liberals deem these terms hostile.

Same goes for Asians. Once Orientals was simply a term for people of the Orient. Now that's offensive, so we must say Asian or Vietnamese or Chinese or Koreans or Japanese and so on.

Same goes for illegal aliens, criminals they are who we have to handle with kid gloves and pussyfoot around else we hurt their dear feelings. We once could call them what they are and hear nothing about it. Now we must refer to them as "undocumented persons" or "undocumented workers" (as if they're all working).

This type of semantic game is one of the hallmarks the Bolshevik-Clinton Coalition-Political Correctness-Liberal agenda, intended to confuse and morally exhaust the white public.

Scrimshaw #conspiracy answers.yahoo.com

it originally started with a simple idea that made sense regarding the idea of black history... you had an overwhelming population of completely ignorant, uneducated, illterate black people... and the idea put forth by a few black people was to teach black people that they could do stuff too. it wasnt about invention bullshit, it was about setting up black people who became doctors, mechanics, even plumbers as an example... to motivate black people to think they could do more than menial labor.

THAT is when leftist hatemongers came into the game pushing their delusions of a collective... to that end it was about dehumanizing white people and white societies and speaking of them as "really" being these "international spaces"...trivialiing white history and the accomplishments of white civilization, outright dismissing them. and promoted this delusion of "equal contribution" by black people. white liberals took that original idea and turned it into something VERY different than what was intended, and yes it was about pushing htat myth of "equal contribution"

not contribution per se.. "equal" contribution. as if not only america, but by extension all of western civilization wouldnt exist without non-whites. remember, leftist GOALS is the creation of a new post western society FROM white western socities... only one with their own dictates. so black people yet again served a means to an end.

so now we deal with the end result of encouraging and fomenting racial hate and strife...where they mythology of sameness puts black people, black racists and their egos into an IMPOSSBILE situation. a comparison game they cannot ever win.

and you get to the pathetic LIES that come as a result, the desperate attempts to lift up the irrelevant and inconsequential as if it were in any way historically or scientifically relevant... where we now enforce ignorance and ROB children of educations in place of racist doctrine all geared towards pushing that myth of "sameness", of "equal" contribution.... ideological dogma meant to conditioning you towards thinking that this society is already that collective leftists desire to create.

now you and i and everyone else is in a position where we MUST be "racist" if we dont play along with this mythology. whtie liberals DONT GIVE A DAMN about black people, your dissent to the nonsense of equal contribution is ultimately dissent to that end goal of thinking of white western societies as that kind of collective...that "international space" and not a white society. and even black people are put into a position where they get to be "traitors" and "uncle toms" if they dont promote this nonsense

see how incredibly good the left is in exploiting hate and identity politics? black racists acting out of their own insecurities, hate and anger are still channeled to serve leftist goals. and black people with a shred of dignity and intelligence, still have to play along "or else".

walk into a library... pull out a book on black history, black "accomplishments" and "contributions" and real "inventions"... go ahead, pull out book after book and pile them on a table. dont stop... take them all, book after book after book and pile em up. now look at that table and that enourmous pile. the problem is, look at all the books left in the library, the row after row after row after row of shelves from floor to ceiling. its an impossible game that cant ever be won... even with all the lies and fiction.

Various Commenters #racist stormfront.org

RE: “Stamped” - What Blacks Think About America

(PaleIsPretty)

I personally consider blacks the enemy. Not only because I do not wish to share a society side by side with them but mainly because whites are mixing with them at increasing rates.. even the elusive (until recently) wm/bw pairing.

It's no wonder how they feel about America and their patriotism being "different." That is because worldwide they identify as AFRICAN first before their nation of birth.

If only Whites could hold such a frame of mind!

(forrester)

Blacks are inferior. They are stupid and lazy by nature. Look at any negro section 8 housing project where the people live off welfare and see how they do nothing productive at all all day. Blacks have smaller brains and are more violent and prone to crime. What people have been right about them for as long as they were around blacks that they are less evolved. I think Rushton and Carlton Coon we're right. They told the truth about race and iq and the science establishment denounced their work.

(White gold)

It was a mistake to bring them here. Take anyone into your home aka nannies, house cleaners, gardeners, etc and they become part of the home, and a certain amount of intimacy is inevitable.

Whites need to stop using non whites as our help!! This habit of having non whites do our chores has literally decimated white civilizations!

Blacks are a cautionary tale. It might seem these lower IQ coloreds are a bargain, but our descendants will pay dearly. They will always remain dependent on us, and both they and us will hate it!!

We need to pick our own fruit, and have only white nannies, housekeepers, gardeners, etc. We will pay more now, but save so much in the future.

About 10 years ago some popular US black rapper came to Poland for concert and collabo with local hip-hop artists. I remember an interview with him when said that he always feel like a total foreigner and immigrant in America despite the fact his ancestors lived there throught the hundreds years.

This is because the United States was built for whites by whites. Blacks did not build America. We were over 90% of the population till like 1965.
America was conceived from white men’s minds. They are the foremost architects of what was once the greatest nation in the world.

It was the Jews passing themselves off as white that convinced white men that America wasn’t a people but an idea that anyone could subscribe to. Now a Mexican illegal can walk across the border and births a baby and that baby is as American as you or I am. But she knows, and the baby when he grows up knows that is not so because they will both hate America, and say we stole it.

For a race to love a country it must have been conceived by their own people. If it wasn’t they will never truly feel comfortable there.

(Ethan Edwards)

I, absolutely, consider the negro to be an enemy. If you do not, you are foolish, because that is exactly what they consider you to be (no matter what your TV, Hollywood Madison Ave., etc. tell you). If you consider the black to be your friend or ally, you are setting yourself up to be their victim.

(SirWalterWhite)

I only made it half way before I determined blacks are StoOpiD and couldn’t continue.

The only thing really accurate is blacks are not wholly human.

That's right. Blacks are not fully human. It's time for the stupid white masses to realize this fact. No more coddling them, no more enabling them, and no more having them live off of hard working white families.
They are savages. Let's get those boats moving!