Similar posts

David Garrett #fundie returnofkings.com

(Submitter's note: SPOILER ALERT!)

Why Star Wars: The Force Awakens Is A Social Justice Propaganda Film

Spread my warning across the galaxy, Padawans.

The Force Awakens is spectacularly replete with the handiwork of the avowed Social Justice Warrior JJ Abrams. So where can I possibly start in my criticisms? From the casting, which puts minorities and women incessantly and ridiculously in your face to make a political point (not tell a story), to the laziest of all space battles, the problems with the Episode 7 are more than numerous.

Let’s make no mistake: Abrams is a capable filmmaker, when he wants to be. Parts with General Hux, especially his speech and the destruction of the Hosnian system, are glorious. The visuals, not just those with CGI, are stunning. Abrams’ mission, though, is to distract viewers with impressive scenes and some chunks of capably written dialogue so as to implant his take on “girl power” and safe spaces for non-whites.

The Mary Sue of all Mary Sues

Is there anything she can’t do after reading a third wave feminist tract?
The female Rey, who it is heavily implied is Luke’s daughter, is the most underdeveloped character yet in over 14 hours of Star Wars films. Her story arc is practically-speaking non-existent and only the veneer of her sadness about her family leaving her on Jakku is painted over it. Whereas with other major Force-wielders in the series their abilities have previously developed or are developed over years, Rey seemingly does it in less than 12 seconds, rather than parsecs. Her whole trajectory in the film reeks of “god mode”, which for non-gamers like myself refers to the cheat codes that make a game character invincible.

Big question: did she fart in the wind on Jakku and the blowback from the desert winds grew her Force powers to monolithic proportions? That’s the only possible explanation.

In the case of Anakin Skywalker in the prequels, by contrast, we learn that he is the only human pilot to engage in pod racing. His mechanical know-how has been honed over some years, culminating in his construction of both his own pad racer and the droid C-3PO. And when he destroys the droid control ship above Naboo, it is largely as a result of his good fortune, not just long-acquired skill. A decade later and with continuous training, he additionally fails to best Count Dooku on Geonosis.

Two hours into the first film, with no training, Rey beats Kylo Ren. Four hours into the original trilogy, and with the training of Ben Kenobi and Yoda, Luke loses his right hand. Go girls!
Cast your mind back to the original trilogy, too. Aside from a little kid’s play with his father’s lightsaber at Ben Kenobi’s hermit pad and onboard the Millennium Falcon, Luke does not wield the weapon at all in A New Hope, let alone in combat against the likes of a Vader. He does destroy the Death Star as a very novice X-wing pilot, but this is after years of him taking out his stuck-on-bloody-Tatooine frustrations on womp rats in his T-16. Moreover, Luke would have been burnt space toast without the intervention of Han Solo and the Falcon. Oh, and in The Empire Strikes Back, after the tutelage of Yoda, he still gets his hand cleaved off by Vader.

So I am meant to believe that Rey could savage and nearly kill her presumed cousin Kylo Ren, whether he is injured or not? Ren is not yet a Vader in his powers. That much is clear. But this is the man who helped slaughter, as a boy or teenager, basically all of the talented pupils of Luke Skywalker. Luke then disappears and Kylo Ren is given more or less free rein, only to be wounded once by Chewbacca’s crossbow, once by apparently non-Force-sensitive Finn (“This is for slavery, whitey!”) and three times by Rey (“Fuck the patriarchy!”). Fuck off—that’s a plot fueled by meth.

To boot, Rey’s piloting and mechanical skills, to the point of knowing everything, is mind-boggingly “get more women in STEM” in its motivations. When she starts teaching Han Solo about the Falcon, things become breathtakingly contrived. It’s as if Abrams was paid by a female science scholarship foundation to drum up some public service announcements via film.

The plot is IQ-damagingly dumb

They put twenty times more effort into the parade than organizing the base defenses. And they didn’t learn from either the first or second Death Star debacles. Or Abrams and his writing team were too busy making Rey a goddess.
I take no issue with some of the artistic license Abrams uses in The Force Awakens. How the First Order managed to create a sun-sucking super weapon on a preexisting ice planet can be explained one day by some talented PhD graduate from the University of Coruscant. So, too, can the appearance of the Starkiller’s death beams and the destruction of the Hosnian system in the sky above far removed Takodana.

What matters, though, is the plot. Scientific ambiguities and inaccuracies can be tolerated if the story functions. But it’s entirely lacking here. For a start, the film borrows from or plain copies so many elements of A New Hope that I lost count. A non-exhaustive list would include a girl being held captive at the flagship facility of a military junta, a space battle to prevent the noble guerrillas’ base from being obliterated, and the death of an older character just as the younger infiltrators are about to leave for home. For the sake of free words, I cannot mention them all.

Beyond just the formulaic plot, here are a few of the frankly stupid elements of the story:

Finn just happens to be an ex-sanitation worked at Starkiller Base, in a galaxy where the First Order forces are now so numerous and powerful that the New Republic has to use the Resistance as a weak proxy to fight it. So he knows where to find the oscillator, which will destabilize and then obliterate the planet if destroyed. Makes perfect sense!
Both in its size and complexity, Starkiller Base makes the two Death Stars look like plasticine renderings. Yet there is no fleet to protect it? And a paucity of very ineffective turbolaser batteries and TIE fighter squadrons? A Resistance member at their headquarters light years away mentions them losing half their X-wings during the battle, as if that was so hard when they launched about, um, three and a half of them.
The amazingly overblown female character Captain Phasma is held at gunpoint and forced to lower Starkiller Base’s shields. These shields can be lowered so easily and without the immediate knowledge of General Hux or someone else? Oh, please, spare me.
Han Solo exits hyperspace no more than a few hundred metres from the surface of the Starkiller planet. And he announces it with “Now!” Hooray! Base infiltrated with common sense!
Finn is likeable but nevertheless a glorified white knight. Trained from just after birth to be a fighting machine, he does nothing relative to Rey and devotes the whole film to trying to protect her.

Tick the boxes with plenty of female and non-white characters

Game of Thrones’ Jessica Henwick was a cast a female X-wing pilot. Again, cast for her race and gender.
You can sniff out Abrams’ leanings from the start. As First Order troopships prepare to land to take out a village on Jakku, the first villager who pulls out a a blaster in defense is a woman. And it is some sort of big, mounted-looking one! This girl power is really paralleled in our world, where millions of young Western girls are so keen to protect their village or country that they won’t even join up, as their male contemporaries are forced to, in places like Finland and South Korea during peacetime. Or make the slightest squeak about the double standard. Well done, JJ.

Captain Phasma is given command of the First Order’s elite stormtroopers but she has the same biology as in our world, where no woman has ever passed the Marine Corps’ Infantry Officer Course. Another female stormtrooper reports to Ren about the failed attempt to locate Rey. And, after years of pretty much male-only recruitment, the New Republic’s affirmative action policies have been copied by the First Order, with large numbers of female military panel operators, technicians and officers.

The same goes for the racial choices. Insert a token female Asian and black male pilot. Black and Asian pilots were actually first done long ago (in Return of the Jedi) but JJ needs more, more, more! All while the plot suffers. Funny how an overwhelmingly male military combat force in a film is considered “unrealistic” when it is almost a carbon copy of our own reality in 2015.

Do not watch this film (at least by paying)

Pretty much sums it up.
Somebody has to watch it and for ROK that person is me. Our proprietor Roosh has refused to and all power to him and anyone else who has abstained. It helps when a limited few of us view it, to pick it apart piece by piece. An understanding of how entertainment is being used to propagandise acceptable social narratives is important.

It’s laughable how critics can butcher the revelation in the prequels that the Force is just the interaction of symbiotic organisms called midi-chlorians and other living things but laud The Force Awakens as a piece of sophisticated, “progressive” filmmaking. Some outlets have even resorted to naming and implicitly shaming critics who disliked this new addition. For a good parody of the pro-SJW obsessions of The Force Awakens, see Steven Crowder’s recent takedown.

For the time being, when it comes to deciding whether to see this film, take evasive action. It’s a trap.

Bob Smith #sexist returnofkings.com

9 Secrets About Female Nature Told By A Hot Girl Dying Of Cancer

Many years ago, I became friends with a very hot blonde in her early 30’s who was dying of cancer. Due to her impending death, she decided that it was okay to relay a vast amount of inside information to me, regarding what women were really all about. She volunteered this information. I have never forgotten what she told me, and it has served me quite well over the years.

Here is a summary of the ten things she told me about the true nature of women, which were related to me over the span of a couple of weeks, shortly before her passing:

1. Women are exactly like little children

We are constantly poking, prodding and testing a man, in order to find out what his boundaries are. If he has no boundaries, we will destroy him, especially if he loves us. A man has to have boundaries, and he has to outline them precisely, and he has to force us to adhere to them with the power of his conviction and the power of his action. If he doesn’t do that, we will beat him over the head with his weaknesses (his lack of boundaries) until he breaks.

2. Women put up a false front about virtually everything

Our faces are fake (makeup), our hair is fake (dyed), our boobs are fake (some of us), everything about us is fake. Most especially when it comes to what is inside of us. We lie constantly, because we are far worse, character-wise, than even our closest friends or lovers will ever know, and we desperately fight to keep all of that hidden.

We are looking for our true daddies, basically – the idealized daddies that we never had – somebody who can see through all of our false fronts and call us out on our bullshit and put us in our place. The problem is, those type of men are very few and far between.

3. If a woman ever tells you, “If we don’t have trust, we don’t have anything,” she is either cheating on you or planning to cheat on you

There are no exceptions to this rule. We use that as cover, to try and make the man feel guilty for questioning our fidelity. What we are really saying here, is, “I will fuck whomever I want and you’d better keep your nose out of it or I’ll cut you off from my pussy and I’ll ruin your freaking life if you keep pressing the issue.” If we really cared about you, and if we really weren’t cheating on you or planning to cheat on you, we would tell you something like, “I am not cheating on you, I love you, and I would never do that. I don’t care if we have to stay up all night, for the next week, and go over every single shred of doubt that’s currently troubling you about this. I have nothing to hide, I would never cheat on you, and I don’t want you thinking these things about me. Please tell me exactly why you think I am cheating, point by point, and I will do anything and everything that I have to do to prove to you that I’m not cheating, in order to ease your worried mind.”

4. Women are much hornier than men

Vastly, exponentially, hornier than men. A woman will do just about anything, sexually speaking, so long as she is fairly certain she won’t get caught. For example, we will occasionally go out of town in order to rendezvous with a man we’ve been longing to fuck, and/or to have multiple sex partners in the same evening, and/or at the same time.

This is something that hot women do, most especially. In our minds, it is a natural desire, and a natural thing, and so long as nobody else finds out, it’s “game on”. Women are receptacles for cock, that’s how we have been biologically designed. Nothing feels better to us than being completely filled up with multiple penises, than being the center of sexual attention, than being the object of unbridled group lust. Since it’s something we can’t risk doing on our home turf (don’t shit where you eat), we have to think outside the box, in order to get our boxes completely satisfied. And you might find this shocking, but many women – many, many women – have sex with dogs on a routine basis. This is just one example of how insatiable we truly are.

I can see why you might not believe it, to which I say, look really hard at all of the women you know who have dogs. Look at women who have dogs whenever you see them out on the street, in the act of walking those dogs. Or at the park. You will notice that most of them have male dogs – the vast majority, in fact. This isn’t a coincidence. And look at all the female teachers who are exposed in the media for having sex with underage students. We have no self-control when it comes to sex – or anything else, for that matter. To our way of thinking, losing control is what makes sex great. Doing anything that is taboo is what makes sex great.

5. Women do not have female friends—they have female competition

We lie to our so-called female friends and pretend we are loyal and faithful to them, just like we do with the men in our lives. Secretly, we are jealous of each other, and we want all of the desirable things that other women have—most especially when it comes to our female friends’ things.

And we consider men to be things. If one of our friends has a hot man, we want him to want us. We will do everything we can to seduce him. Not because we really want him—we don’t really want anybody. We do it because we are rarely happy, and we don’t want our girlfriends to be happy, either, and we want to boost our own egos more than anything else.

And after we get him to fuck us, when our girlfriends find out that he has had sex with us, that’s when we finally get what we wanted in the first place. If we break up the previously happy couple, that’s fine, too. It’s all about our pussy, not hers. It’s about winning.

6. Women always lie about the number of sexual partners they’ve had

They also lie about not wanting men with large penises. If we told the actual truth about the number of different men and women we’ve slept with, and if we told the actual truth about our fervent desire for big dicks, our pool of potential suitors would shrink drastically, to the point where it would completely dry up. So we lie. Most often, we will claim that we’ve had between three and eight sexual partners in our lifetime. And, to our way of thinking, it isn’t a lie, because if we had five sexual partners last Saturday evening, and our man asks us how many sexual partners we have had, and we answer, “Five”, well, technically, we aren’t lying.

7. All women dislike themselves

And because we dislike ourselves, we fervently hate any man who doesn’t see through our bullshit. The more a man loves us, the more we hate him. The more he overlooks our sins, and the more he fails to see how corrupt we are, and the more he gives us the benefit of every single doubt – the more we despise him. We will escalate our bad behavior until we finally break him and he wakes up and realizes how worthless we are and what a fool he has been for believing in us.

8. Women want what they can’t have

We want a man whom we can’t have. We want a man who honestly doesn’t give a fuck about us, who doesn’t care if we come or go. That’s the kind of man we will pursue. Call them bad boys or call them whatever you want, that’s the kind of man we want – period. The kind of guy who will make us orgasm, crudely, and give us a huge sexual thrill in the bedroom, and then discard us like used toilet paper, and fuck our female friends afterwards, just because he can. (Just like we would do with his male friends.)

9. All women are masochists

And all hot women are narcissistic masochists. We hate it when things are going well, especially if they continue to go well for long periods of time. We know down deep that we are fucked-up and not worthy of anything that is truly good. So when things are going well in a relationship, we eventually sabotage it. We just can’t help ourselves in this regard.

We could have the greatest, most handsome, most well-hung husband in the world—a one-of-a-kind man who makes all of our girlfriends jealous; we could have the greatest children in the world, who are beautiful, well-behaved and ambitious; we could have the most enviable career imaginable; we could have all of the money and prestige and the truly good things in life, and we could repeatedly tell ourselves over and over, and believe, on the surface, that we would never cheat on our husbands. But down deep we know that it’s a lie. Because one day, we could walk into a grocery store, and some bad boy could whisper just the right combination of words in our ear, and the next thing you know, we’re at the Motel 6 getting it in the ass. That’s just how we are, and any woman—especially a hot woman—who says otherwise, is a liar.

Over the years, my deceased friend’s words have proven to be spot-on, in the vast majority of cases. And if they ring true from your own personal experience as well, then I am more than happy that I shared them with you here today. I know that my deceased friend would be thrilled to know that I have shared this information with the manosphere. After all, she used to be a hottie, and she’s now dead, and by giving me the inside scoop on her female competition, she continues to beat them—she continues to “win”—even from beyond the grave.

Unnamed marines #fundie rawstory.com

Two active-duty marines are under investigation for social media posts where they seem to be making violent threats against gay bars, Marine Corps Times reports.

The investigation started after a photo was posted on a closed Facebook group for male marines that showed a marine corporal in uniform pointing a rifle at the camera with the caption, “Coming to a gay bar near you.”

The California-based I Marine Expeditionary Force is investigating both the corporal in the photo and the Marine who posted it on Facebook, Marine Corps Times says.

First Lt. Thomas Gray, a spokesman for I MEF, tells Marine Corps Times that the investigation is being taken “very seriously,” although he declined to go into further details about it.

It’s not clear at this point whether the marines being investigated were making a serious threat or were just making a spectacularly tasteless “joke” in the wake of the massacre at the Pulse nightclub in Orlando. At any rate, it’s good that the military caught word of the photo and is looking into it.

Patrick Scrivener #conspiracy reformation.org

The story of how ex-Marine "Lee Harvey Oswald" defected to the Soviet Union, and was given a job at a top secret radar factory in Minsk, is one of the most sinister MI6/CIA covert operations in history.

Only a thorough knowledge of spies and spying can help unravel the mystery. Throughout history, doubles or look-alikes have been used as spies. In Russia today, a Putin look-alike is actually President of that great country.

Incredibly, in 1952, "Marguerite Oswald" moved all the way from New Orleans to the Bronx to be near her eldest son who was serving in the Coast Guard.

There is a photo of the young "Lee" taken outside the Bronx Zoo. Even back then there were fake "Oswalds" sighted in different parts of the country.

There is a picture of the real Oswald taken at Beauregard Junior High School in 1955.

Oswald was 16 at that time.

Oswald was mentally challenged and basically a dunce in school.

The only Russian word he knew was Sputnik.

The only redeeming feature that high school dropout Oswald had in the Marine Corps was the fact that he had a look-alike or double. The counterfeit was in fact much older, and taller, but the Office of Naval "Intelligence" decided that the resemblance was close enough.

Nobody knows what happened to the real Oswald after he was discharged from the Marine Corps. Most probably he was titaniced (man overboard) and just disappeared until Judgment Day.

The counterfeit Oswald joined the Marine Corps at the same time as the real Oswald.

That Oswald studied Russian, and worked at the top secret radar facility at Atsugu, Japan.

That Oswald imposter was a well trained CIA agent.

The Oswald double was a well trained Naval "Intelligence" agent or spy. He worked at various U.S. Naval Bases and was stationed at Atsugu, Japan. Of course he spoke Russian fluently but with an American accent. He would never be sent to live in Russia as a spy because a native Russian speaker would detect his foreign accent immediately.

The counterfeit "Oswald" defected to the Soviet Union in 1959!!

The fake Oswald arrived in Moscow on October 15, 1959, and wrote a letter to the Supreme Soviet demanding Russian citizenship. Oswald told the Russians that he was an ex-Marine who had worked at a top secret radar facility and had much clandestine information for them.

On October 15, 1959, Marxist Marine "Oswald" arrived in Moscow and stayed at the Hotel Berlin.

He wrote a letter to the Soviet government and demanded Russian citizenship.

Naturally, the Soviets, suspecting that he was a CIA spy, denied his request, and ordered him to leave the country immediately.

As a result of his citizenship denial, Oswald feigned suicide and he was "discovered" with a slit wrist in the hotel bathtub. "Oswald" was then rushed by ambulance to Botkinskaya Hospital where he received 5 stitches. He remained in the hospital for 3 days in the psychiatric ward and 4 days in the somatic ward for observation.

The "suicide attempt" delayed his deportation from Russia because the Russians feared an international incident if an American killed himself or died in the Soviet Union.

On October 31, the fake Oswald walked in to the American embassy in Moscow, threw his passport on consul Richard Snyder's desk, and demanded to take the oath renouncing his U.S. citizenship.

Snyder was a CIA agent assigned to the U.S. embassy.

[...]

How Oleg von Mohrenschildt became Lee Harvey Oswald!!

After the charade in Moscow with the fake "Oswald" attempting suicide, the scene now shifts to Minsk, capital of Belarus. Minsk was an industrial town about 500 miles southwest of Moscow. Oswald was given a high paying job and scenic apartment overlooking the Svislach River:

Lee started his job in Minsk on January 13, and in March he was awarded a pleasant one-room apartment with a view overlooking the river. His financial situation was superb. He earned $70 to $90 a month at work and received an additional $70 a month in the form of a Red Cross subsidy. He had as much monthly income as the director of his factory. Lee did not particularly like his job. It was mere manual labor, while he had hoped for a place in an institute and a chance to study full time. But as the object of much attention and the recipient, like every foreigner, of many favors, he was at first reasonably content. (McMillan, Marina and Lee, p. 79).

The high school dropout from New Orleans was certainly warmly received in Russia.

The "Lee" in Minsk was actually Oleg von Mohrenschildt, illegitimate son of Dallas resident George de Mohrenschildt.

On March 25, 1961, Oleg, aka Lee, met Marina Prusakova at a dance.

Marina–a fluent English speaker–was a "honey trap" and well trained KGB agent.

The KGB was formed by British Secret Service agent Nikita Khrushchev in 1954. Marina was the daughter of a high ranking KGB colonel named Ilya Vasilyevich Prusakov, who was stationed in Minsk at that time.

The KGB was the Russian counterpart of the CIA. Marina said that "Oswald" spoke Russian with a Baltic accent:

Almost immediately a knot of young men formed around her and she was introduced to one named Alik, who seemed instantly drawn to her. They danced, and when they spoke, she noticed he spoke Russian with a slight accent. At first she thought he was from one of the Baltic parts of the Soviet Union–Estonia, Latvia or Lithuania–but then found to her surprise that he was an American named Lee Harvey Oswald living in Minsk. (Epstein, Legend: The Secret World of Lee Harvey Oswald, p. 135).

Marina said that she called him Alik because Lee sounded like a Chinese name. A Texan speaking fluent Russian with a Baltic accent. What a fairly tale that only strong VOODOO could make people believe.

KGB "honey trap" Marina Prusakova married Oleg aka Lee on April 30, 1961.

No fiction writer could have invented a more improbable scenario . . . except that it really happened.

Her KGB assignment was to "help" Oleg aka Lee join his father in Texas and maybe do a little spying for his country.

When the time for the assassination of President Kennedy drew near, Oleg aka Lee decided that his decision to defect was not a good idea after all. To this his wife Marina eagerly concurred.

The "workers paradise" was not what he expected, even though he earned a higher salary and had a better apartment than workers twice his age.

Oleg aka Lee contacted CIA consul Richard Snyder and was told that he still had his passport. By that time, Oleg and Marina had a baby girl named June. Diplomats who married Russian wives had to wait for years for their spouses to get visas to leave the Soviet Union.

Femme fatale Marina–the female version of the Russian Guy Fawkes–rarely smiled.

If only Oleg's friends in Minsk knew that he was going to be framed for assassinating the President of the United States.

[...]

The man from Minsk was FRAMED for the murder of the President!!

It was a highly complicated psyop to get the man from Minsk in the right place to be framed for President Kennedy's assassination. Everything did work out perfectly until the aftermath of the shooting.


About 12:15 p.m., Oleg left the building; walked 7 blocks to Elm and Murphy, and then boarded a bus bound for his lodging house in Oak Cliff.

The bus was stuck in traffic so he got off at the Greyhound Bus Terminal and took a cab.

The driver entered the time in his logbook as 12:30 p.m.

The President was shot at 12:30 p.m., so how could the man from Minsk be in 2 places at the same time. The Russians are a super race to survive Napoleon, Hitler, and the Cold War but they are not omnipresent.

The whole diabolical assassination scenario took years to plan but it all depended on Oleg the "patsy" being killed immediately afterward. You could say it all began after April 15, 1865.

Our Great JEHOVAH intervened and the police failed to kill the man from Minsk in the Texas Theater. Since that time, literally hundreds of people associated in any way with the assassination have met violent deaths or were suicided.

Vox Day #fundie voxday.blogspot.com


The recent hashtag fireworks between the pro-immigration and anti-immigration right appears to be the second step of a long-awaited political battle that I have expected for more than a decade now. For years, conservatives afraid of being called racist have stupidly attempted to finesse the immigration issue, claiming that "it's not the immigration, it's the illegality" while loudly declaring their support for LEGAL immigration to balance their opposition to ILLEGAL immigration. But the distinction was always meaningless; the behavior of the individual immigrant and the cumulative effects of mass immigration have historically had nothing to do with the legality or illegality of the act of immigration. The intra-Right conflict we're seeing now is in part the result of the Obama Administration punching right through that ridiculous position by simply legalizing larger-scale immigration than before. This is the second step of the battle; the first step was the publication of Ann Coulter's Adios America, which marked the first time a major American conservative media figure besides Pat Buchanan had the courage to finally come out and admit that the real problem with immigration is a) the quality of the immigrants, and b) the quantity of the immigrants.

I am an immigrant myself; my children are second-generation immigrants. Keep in mind that to the extent you consider us to be more-or-less normal Americans, that is precisely how all of the first- and second-generation Mexicans, Chinese, Somalis, and Nigerians living in America are still more-or-less normal Mexicans, Chinese, Somalis, and Nigerians. The only difference is that we've been here longer, we're more integrated, and we speak the language. Potete domandare Giuseppe cosi. Geographical translocation is not magic. Move enough Mexicans into California, you don't make them Californians, you turn California into Mexico. I've seen the same thing over here on a smaller scale in British expat colonies where people who have lived in Italy for 15 years don't speak more than 10 words of Italian, still drink tea instead of espresso and can't cook worth a damn. Being there doesn't feel like Italy, it feels like being in England, and more properly English than Londonistan is these days.

I should probably mention that if you're going to try to disqualify me as an anti-Mexican racist simply because I observe the indisputable truth, my response is simple: va fanculo, my great-grandfather rode with Villa, fought with Villa, and barely escaped Villa's assassins. The truth is the truth regardless of the genetic heritage of the individual observing it.

The Israeli military historian Martin van Creveld has a brilliant essay on the martial implications of immigration that will be published in Volume 2 of Riding the Red Horse, which I am now beginning to assemble. And the remarkable thing is that he reaches a disturbingly similar conclusion to Heartiste's well-known aphorism, Diversity + Proximity = War, only one that is even stronger. One reason the world is in the process of descending into war all over the globe is due to the unprecedented mass movement of peoples - as Umberto Eco pointed out more than a decade ago, to call it "immigration" is fundamentally a misnomer - and the sheer scale of these mass movements makes war inevitable.

Remember, the entry of the Nazis into Austria was arguably more legal than the actions of the Obama administration with regards to immigration. The Nazis even let the immigrated invaded Austrians vote on it in a national referendum, which is something neither the Democrats and the Republican #cuckservatives would permit the American people. But the end result of the Anschluss was no different than the Nazi's subsequent illegal immigration into invasion of Czechoslovakia, Nazi rule.

I think Mike Cernovich's definition of #cuckservative is probably the most useful one. If you are in any way an advocate for those who intend to rape and pillage you and yours, you are a #cuckservative. I also think that what we're seeing is a generational divide. People my age and older tend to view things from a perspective of a permanent white majority. So, they tend to view everything from a view of racial noblesse oblige. They believe America's success can be shared with the New Americans without that success being destroyed.

The younger generation of white Americans know better. They know they are just another racial group among many, larger, more divided, advantaged in some ways, disadvantaged in others, and with a target tattooed on their chests due to their historical "privilege". Those inclined to buy into the rainbow mythology become SJWs or submissive moderates, those who are not don't buy into any of it, including the various aspects of "melting pot" theology in which their conservative elders still foolishly believe. They know that what their elders still think to be theoretically achievable is impossible, because unlike their elders, they didn't grow up with diversity being a theoretical objective to be celebrated, but a terrible reality to be suffered.

The most ridiculous thing about #cuckservatism is that it's an inherently losing strategy. If your primary political objective is to avoid being called racist, you will lose. And then you will be called racist anyhow.

Joe Marine 76 #fundie freerepublic.com

Okay,... I’ve been holding my tongue on this issue for a long, ...long time and it has NOTHING to do with whether a “Trump” has served in the military or not.

To begin with, that argument is a “non sequitur.” I AM a Retired US Marine Major, so please permit me: The Rand Corporation did a study and reported there are somewhere between 3,000 and 6,000 (if I remember the figure correctly) “transgenders” serving in the Active US Armed Forces. The study did NOT include members of the US National Guard or the Reserve Components of the Regular Services, i.e, US Army, USMC, US Navy, and US Air Force. The “transgenders” are those who identify as the opposite sex; ...cross-dress up at night out in town, in the barracks or in their off-base quarters, in attire opposite their birth sex? That said, here’s where this issue gets complicated: Do any of you readers here think that the US Armed Forces, vis a vis, the American Taxpayer should pay for “gender reassignment surgeries?” Gender reassignment surgeries can cost around $132,000 per. Added to that, is the cost AND time spent for follow-up $1200 per month hormone therapy treatment and hours AND hours of counseling by DoD Doctors and Psychologists at whatever base to which they are assigned.

And with the post surgery “down-time,” these individuals would be for upwards of 240 days, in a “Non-Deployable” status. So, who takes the place of the Marine Infantryman (MOS 0331), now a “Reassigned Transgendered Male,” who was scheduled to go afloat, but now can’t, with the Amphibious Readiness Group-Landing Force of a Marine Expeditionary Unit because “he” is having post-op complications? What happens when the trans-individual Marine has post-surgery physical complications and is afloat with the Navy; or in some instance, the individual happens to be a Soldier or Airman stationed with US Armed Forces in Germany or South Korea? What happens if a reassigned trans-individual has psychological complications in dealing with their condition and their new “sex” while deployed elsewhere in the world... let’s say, in Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean... or Adak, Alaska... or Reykjavik, Iceland?

Also, do we give these individual “special dispensation” from serving in these duty stations? Who’s the service member who has to take their place in these sometimes “hardship duty stations?” Your son or your daughter? Now if a guy or a gal wishes to play dress-up, “Play House” or play the role of “Buckeroo Banzai” in the barracks or wherever, they can have at it, for all I’m concerned. During my service time as a Commanding Officer or Executive Officer of a Company and Battalion, I’ve gotten worse Monday morning reports from the Barracks Duty NCO after many, many payday weekends!

Trust me. But when we go “down the rabbit hole” to taxpayer-funded reassignment surgeries in our Armed Forces, we are embarking on a truly wasteful and unnecessary venture. How many transgenders will seek the opportunity for taxpayer and “free” gender reassignment surgery? Do we give this costly and time consuming surgery to “Private Joseph P. Schmuckatella USMC” because all of a sudden he “thinks” he is a girl and wants to become “Josephine?” Do we allow others to enlist, get the surgery and then all of a sudden, it seems, they “can’t handle the military” because of “psychological issues?” This whole “transgenders serving in the military” issue is pure “PC” nonsense... of course there are gays and transgenders in the military.

There always has been.... we were not always sure who they were; sometimes one could make a pretty good guess though,.... no homophobia or transphobia here.... just plain horse sense with regard to who pays for gender reassignment surgeries. Now, everyone wants to point to Chris (”Kristen”) Beck, the RETIRED Navy SEAL who was a “transgender” while serving in the Navy. All well and good. I honestly thank him for his service and his heroics. I don’t know if he had the gender reassignment surgery after he retired to become a “female,” but I know he lied when he said he was a member or SEAL Team 6 when it took out Osama Bin Ladin.

He actually retired about six months before that expedition. I served twenty years as a Commissioned Officer with Fleet Marine Force Units in the 2nd Marine Division, 1st and 2nd Marine Aircraft Wings; 1st Marine Expeditionary Brigade and with I MEF in the Persian Gulf (Ops Desert Sheild - Desert Storm). I went through the Officers Candidate Course at Quantico, VA and served as the Logistics Officer (Special Staff - 4) for the Recruit Training Regiment at Marine Corps Recruit Depot, Parris Island, SC. I experienced “becoming a Marine” as an Officer Candidate and personally witnessed the magnificent tranformation of fine American youth, male and female, to “becoming US Marines” at MCRD, Parris Island. As Commanders and Marine Officers, we are responsible for FIRST, the “MIssion” and SECONDLY, “Troop Welfare.” Added to that, we have a responsibility for “Unit Cohesion” and folks, this PC nonsense is NOT included in that part of our responsibilities.

This is not a game or “social experiment.” Marines and other Armed Forces Military Members lives are on the line here. Having said all this: Please let me direct you to Dr. Paul McHugh’s, from Johns Hopkins, study about “Gender Dysphoria.” You can google it. He has studied “Gender Dysphoria” for OVER 40 years. He is dead set against Gender Reassignment Surgery. And parents are doing a great disserve to their chlldren when they let them go down that road. Why? Upwards of 40 - 48% of transgenders attempt suicide. Dr. McHugh’s salient point: “Males will never truly become females and females will never truly become males.” So, do we want those who are having psychological issues on the front lines in combat alongside fellow Marines or Soldiers with fully loaded arms? You be the judge of Dr. McHugh’s work and determine for yourself if there’s not something wrong with “trangenders” entering our military.

James Reilly, USMC Ret #fundie chattanoogan.com

I am proud to have served my country for 20 years as a United States Marine. It greatly disturbs me to know that when I am laid to rest in the National Cemetery, my family will have the option of having a pentacle (five pointed star emblem of Wicca - Witchcraft) placed on my headstone but they will not have the option of placing silk flowers on my grave for six months out of every year because the National Cemetery is viewed as a “shrine" and the artificial flowers are said to detract from that image.

What is the next step? Will witches be allowed to conduct their rituals on the grounds of our national cemeteries? Why is it that we have to become politically correct in every facet of our life and now every facet of our death? The local newspaper stated that Wicca is a "nature based religion" (occult) and the points on the star represent earth, air, water, fire. Where is God? As in "God, corps, country, family" (Marine Corps philosophy).

When do we, as American veterans, stand up and say "enough is enough?" Let me be the first United States Marine/military veteran to stand up and say "enough is enough" and I hope others follow suit with their convictions and do not bow down to political correctness.

Semper Fidelis
James Reilly, USMC Ret
Hixson

Gunnery Sgt. Joseph Felix #fundie nypost.com

A former Marine Corps drill instructor was convicted by a military jury of physically abusing young recruits — focusing his fury on three Muslim-Americans whom he referred to as “terrorists.”

The eight-man jury at Camp Lejeune, NC, determined Thursday that Gunnery Sgt. Joseph Felix was guilty of hazing and maltreatment of recruits at the boot camp in Parris Island, SC.

[...]

Felix was accused of being a central figure in an abusive group of drill instructors that came to light after the March 2016 suicide of one of the three Muslim-American recruits he targeted.

[...]

He had pleaded not guilty and did not testify during his trial.

The lengthy list of charges against Felix included a series of disturbing acts against more than a dozen recruits. They included ordering recruits to choke each other, ordering them to drink chocolate milk and then training them until they vomited, assaulting recruits, and forcing Muslim recruits into a clothes dryer.

“He wasn’t making Marines. He was breaking Marines,” prosecutor Lt. Col. John Norman told the jury.

Felix was a “bully” who particularly “picked out three Muslim recruits for special abuse because of their Muslim faith,” he said.

In one case, Felix ordered former trainee Lance Cpl. Ameer Bourmeche into a commercial clothes dryer, which then was turned on as Felix ordered him to renounce his Islamic faith, prosecutors said.

Bourmeche testified that he twice affirmed his creed and twice Felix and another DI sent him for a scorching tumble inside the dryer. After a third spin, Bourmeche said, he feared for his life and renounced his faith. The DIs then let him out, he said.

Felix also maltreated Raheel Siddiqui, 20, a Pakistani-American. Siddiqui committed suicide in March 2016 after Felix barked at and slapped him, prosecutors said.

[...]

In 2015 and 2016, the DI derided Siddiqui and two other Muslims as “terrorists,” Norman said. Felix also ordered Bourmeche to simulate chopping off the head of a fellow Marine while reciting “God is great” in Arabic, Norman said.

Felix was permanently removed from his duties as a DI after the probe began, said Marine Corps spokesman Capt. Joshua Pena.

Paul and Lynn Shmaltz #quack #crackpot #mammon plasmaenergysolution.com

Plasma Energy is currently defined by a nuclear physicist, engineer and researcher as the “water” of the fields of the universe. Accessing these fields means tapping into that “water.” Plasma energy fields emanate like ripples in water and they have wind-like waves that ebb and flow.

Plasma energy has potential difference in magnetic gravitational strength when descending from a higher level to a lower level. It creates the same release of energy seen in hydroelectric dams. It has the same power as the nuclear essence; it has everything which we have tapped into according to this place in time and our current intelligence —and it has given us the ability to use it constructively.

It goes by several different names such as zero point energy torsion fields, magnetic and gravitational fields and others.

Plasma energy fields can be demonstrated with magnets. When these magnets are pulled together that is the attraction of their plasmatic gravitational fields. When magnets repel each other they are sending magnetic energy. When they reach equilibrium the repelling stops.

This action of the magnetic gravitational plasma fields is apparent throughout the physical world. It is what balances the position of the planets and keeps them from colliding. The molecules and atoms in the bodies of plants, pets and people act in accord with planets by attracting and repelling each other, always seeking a balance of plasma energy.

It is taught that the addition of non -toxic plasmatic fields to people, plants or pets that are out of balance due to disease or injury puts the body in the proper plasmatic environment so the body can restore health and reduce pain. The body only uses what is needed to restore and maintain balance. When attraction and repulsion stop balance is achieved and the body remains in natural homeostasis or balance.
<…>
More than 90% of the bodies of people, plants and pets are made up of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen and oxygen — all of which have plasmatic fields.

When addressing support for various illnesses, various elements are used to make GANS, an acronym for Gas in Atomic Nano Solid State. These GANS which have very powerful plasmatic fields, influence the imbalance caused by disease or injury in people, plants and pets. In doing so, biological balance is returned, allowing healing to occur.

To utilize plasma energy in health issues it is necessary to break down matter into a mono-atomic state where all chemical bonds of compounds and molecules are broken and atoms that would normally be connected to other atoms in a molecular compound are now alone.

Atoms in this state send out a magnetic gravitational field trying to fulfill their electrical orbit that influences other atoms, molecules and compounds in an attempt to complete themselves. It is this magnetical, gravitational field of influence that we use to influence certain aspects of the human, animal or plant body to bring about a change in conditions that is beneficial to the human, animal or plant.

This concept is applicable to many areas of our life such as travel, agriculture, athletics and support for health conditions such as cataracts, glaucoma and other eye issues, arthritis, wound healing, lung conditions, hormone conditions and many, many more.

Vox Day #fundie voxday.blogspot.com

The Marines will have no choice but to make the Combat Endurance Test more equal. Which is to say easier. Because, after all, everyone knows that actual military combat is considerably less difficult than an introductory fitness test.

What I'd love to see is for the Marine Corps to address the political pressure it is facing by creating an all-female combat battalion. Give them the very best of training, the best equipment, and then put them right on the front lines. After one-third of them suddenly fall pregnant before the deployment, another third flee at the first sound of gunfire, and the remaining third are captured and raped, there won't be any need to continue the debate any longer.

When faced with lunatic nonsense, agree and amplify. To be honest, I'm genuinely surprised that none of the four female pioneers managed to break their necks or otherwise get themselves killed during the test.

Vox Day #fundie voxday.blogspot.com

I've been a little taken aback by the sheer vituperation of the SJWs triggered by the mere existence of the Alt??Hero concept, at least at this very early stage. And, I confess, I have been more than a little surprised by their apparent confusion between the late Marvel/DC artist Jack Kirby and the superheroes that he drew.

Ayatollah Cumonme? @Phonycian
if jack kirby were alive today he'd kick you in the balls and spit on you

Supreme Dark Lord? @voxday
If Jack Kirby were alive today, he'd be asking to work for me. The SJWs at Marvel and DC today wouldn't employ him.

rstevens @rstevens
kirby would cook you and serve you to hogs, dude

Supreme Dark Lord? @voxday
You're talking about the little Jewish guy with no biceps, right? Sure, he might draw that.

psychopompous? @prognostiq
you really have fucking clue huh. i mean, not surprising but... you're not fit to shine his shoes, bud.

Supreme Dark Lord? @voxday
Shine his tiny little size five shoes? I shall endeavor to restrain my disappointment.

Jo O'Donnell ?? @bowtiednomad
son hed cause more damage to your body than your daily lunch of 5 5-layer burritos

Supreme Dark Lord? @voxday
A dead guy who went 5'4 and weighed about 125? You've read way too many comic books. You know they're not real, right?

meth lab for cutie? @patrickmustdie
jack kirby would of wooped your ass and then tell the story for laughs at parties for years

Supreme Dark Lord? @voxday
Kirby used to brag about fighting a guy who didn't show up. I made the Commandant of the U.S. Marine Corps tap out in less than 7 seconds.

As strange as it is to be threatened with a very small corpse, I understand that comic book fans enjoy this sort of theoretical matchup. So, just to be clear, this is Jack Kirby in his physical prime, with his wife, Roz. This is another picture of Kirby. This is me, with Spacebunny. Another picture of me. Yes, both pictures were a long time ago, but nevertheless, I am confident that I have maintained myself in rather better condition than Mr. Kirby has.

Jack Kirby's tough guy story: Once, while Jack was in the Timely office, a call came from someone in the lobby. When Kirby answered, the caller threatened Jack with bodily harm if he showed his face. Kirby told the caller he would be right down, but by the time Jack reached street level, there was no one to be found.

Vox Day's tough guy story: In his second public ringfight, his opponent, a Tae Kwan Do practitioner, broke Vox's nose in the initial exchange. Vox didn't notice it until his sensei called time out to stop the bleeding. After the time out, Vox caught his opponent coming in with a sidekick that doubled him over, and proceeded to throw alternating hooks to both sides of the defenseless man's head until the referee stopped the fight in the first round and declared Vox the winner. After the fight, Vox went to the hospital to get his nose straightened out. Mostly.

For what it's worth. Anyhow, what explains this weird elevation of Jack Kirby to demigod status by the Comic SJWs? The answer, as it turns out, is that they believe him to have been their much-revered forefather who blazed the social justice trail they so bravely tread today.

...

So, yeah. This is going to be SO MUCH FUN. You know how SJWs love nothing better than to deconstruct our historical heroes and literally tear them down? Well, as I have pointed out, any use of a tactic legitimizes it....

And they're totally NOT TRIGGERED! NOT EVEN A LITTLE!

Georgie? @SilverDoe_Iso
Thanks to the delightful replies to this idiot, I was made aware of Faiza Hussein, and just ordered myself a comic ??

Well, that certainly shows me! By the way, in the Marvel universe, Faiza Hussein is the current bearer of the sword Excalibur. That's right. In Marvel's world, King Arthur's blade is wielded by a Muslim woman.

But it must be confessed that it is true that the artists of Alt??Hero don't draw women like Jack Kirby did. Then again, why they would want to do so remains a mystery to me. I leave it to the reader to guess which image below is Mr. Kirby's work and which is not. And, in case you're interested, I should probably mention that we anticipate launching the Freestartr campaign tomorrow.

greene66 #fundie freerepublic.com

[re: a marine supporting letting gays serve in the military]

Yeah, the issue is that Obama has faggotized the damned armed forces. The Marine Corps, The Air Force, etc., no longer exist as they did. They now WELCOME degeneracy and perversion. I have no respect for anyone who has joined up from this year forward. And this cowardly, scumbag Marine can go straight to hell where he belongs.

Dariamus #psycho crunchyroll.com

WOULD YOU DATE SOMEONE WHO WAS NARCISSISTIC OR POSSESSIVE OF YOU?

A yandere treated right is just a very devoted dere.

Narcissistic, no.

Possessive: I need to be needed. I married a very possessive woman and have never regretted it.

I would have little to worry about with a girlfriend like Yuno. I enjoy that level of attention from someone I love and, in return, I would never even dream of straying.

Is why I married a girl who is very possessive. Our personality quirks mesh well together.

She calls me every morning after I get to work, every day at lunch, and every evening on my commute home. I look forward to the calls

There was a period I was not able to be there for her. I went out to sea for a few months with no phone or e-mail access. She had a complete mental breakdown. I left the military to spend more time with her. I would like to think she is a lot more stable now than she was then. I've even encouraged her to go back to college. I'll be helping her with her math homework tonight


I've been slapped, punched, bitten and kicked ..... by my wife ...... for assorted things. Getting bitten is the worst, she won't let go.

She was abusive as she never let me have time with friends she would guilt trip me and make me feel bad.
She even made me ditch a friend by guilt tripping me if i didn't.


Did she ever start throwing knives at her own former best friend just because said former best friend gave you a friendly hug?

Or is it my fault for admitting that I used to have feelings for her former best friend?
If I had been more open with my feelings back then, it's entirely possible I would have married the other girl instead of my wife. I found out much later that she was waiting for me to ask her out and only started dating someone else when I did not. This discussion took place years later when I ran into her at a store, without my wife around, and we started talking. She, of course, had found out about my prior feelings the day my girlfriend tried to kill her, but obviously did not stick around to respond.

Never understood why people stayed with someone who practically says you can't have friends, lol.

Love is complicated. Don't expect any easy answers.

I used to have a lot of female friends, but it's not really an option for me these days.
My wife would turn yandere. Again.
Not a joke.

joesolargenius #racist amren.com

I am 60 years old and spent at least two thirds of my childhood living next to the railroad track in Beaumont ,Texas where on the other side was the Black Quarters, I had rock fights with the residents of that neighborhood for almost five years before school integration started.My father whom was a WWll combat veteran and a very large and extremely muscular man from a family of hard drinking and fighting men was the only White man in a union of all Blacks some 400 strong and he was a Steward.The other Union members (blacks) would place their guns on their laps in front of him whenever he stood up to speak out against something he thought was wrong, and this was during the heyday of the Civil rights movement in the sixties.I learned during those times that Blacks had been programmed to hate whites and would try and intimidate them when possible but were afraid to actually attack us openly. I never met a black male whom wanted to be my friend during those times although some of the mixed light skinned girls showed a physical interest in me but were of course forbidden to me by the unspoken rules of White conduct in those days.It was in the Marine Corps as a grown man that I first met Black men whom actually treated me with respect and one actually fought along beside me in a bar fight in Kenville ,Okinawa. As I get older I meet more and more Black people whom are friendly towards me but as there are a lot more Black people here than before I still believe that the percentages are the same. Whenever White people try to live with or associate with groups of Blacks they are subject to more danger and violence and if I continue to live in the South ,it is only a matter of time before I have to kill one in order to save some stupid White Liberal from being harmed by them . I am no longer in good enough health to physically stop several blacks from beating some one to death, therefore I have to stab or shoot one so the rest will run away ! Avoid the Groid has been my Mantra for almost twenty years and should be yours too.

Whale.to #conspiracy whale.to

Entire Kay Griggs: Military Homoccult Beast System. "They took with them the most perverted aspects of Nazi Germany and brought them over to the United States." "They get rid of the good guys. The Marine Corps are the assassins for the Mob. The military is run by the Mob. The military IS the Mob." "He told me what they did. They nurture--they cultivate--the sons of prominent families. They're called "rising stars." They rope them in. Then they "turn" them." Colonel's wife names names in Military/homosexual/pedophile Underground
Recently, Kay Griggs, a prominent military colonel's wife, set out to right a long history of patent wrongs, which include:
- homosexual initiation rites in the U.S. military-
-particularly within the Marines;
- well-documented instances of both
- homosexual and
- hetero pedophilia, often as brazen rape, amongst U.S. military figures and notable senior statesmen, Henry Kissinger being named loudly by Mrs. Griggs.

The initiation into the light of Lucifer is achieved by sodomy of the three year old....A lot of people think of the Illuminati as being a political group of people, but in another sense it’s a brotherhood of sodomites that’s like family.. Deprogrammer Interview with Marion Knox: In the House of the Strongman, Sodomy is the Key - by Elana Freeland

Bielek also said that Reich, during the time in the late 40s when he was doing research on human sexuality for the CIA, is said to have conducted orgies as part of the research, though Al B. makes it clear that he never witnessed it, personally, and of course Bielek's time at Montauk started probably much later. He also said that Reich tried to sabotage the research data when he realized what the CIA was going to do with it: MK Ultra mind conditioning for young boys through sexual trauma. --Don Croft

Well, the CIA's definition of wholesome is starting to rape YOUR children as young as two years of age! Sexually traumatizing them, installing demonic entities in their auras, and turning them into lust-starved assassins with NO HIGHER SELF. Wholesome... Cbswork - June 2004

Al told us that Reich was one of the first scientists employed by the CIA in mind control research. When he realized what the aims of the CIA were in the late 1940’s Reich quit the program after sabotaging the research, but it was too late to stop them from using his work. The Montauk Boys Program was based on Reich’s findings and the researchers forced the boys to engage in sodomy in order to get psychic control over them. Carol told me that the reason I was particularly uncomfortable at Montauk is because I had been one of the early recruits as a child. Al told us that many of the boys died before he was able to get the programmers to stop forcing their cooperation. This would help explain my hatred for this kind of activity. Al says that as he travels around the country he now recognizes many men who had been recruited in the program. The first few hundred were taken from the immediate vicinity. After it became apparent that this would lead to exposure of the program, they used the time tunnel technology (this had been used to abduct Al and his associates from around the country) to pick up boys, brainwash them, and return them before their absence was noticed. This technology was contributed by the B Sirians, whom Al says are the hardware merchants of the galaxy. Carol and I are finding out what the aliens got out of that deal. [2001] The Adventures of Don & Carol Croft – Parts 1 - 10

When you see those pics and films from the prisons of Iraq, you are witnessing the exact procedures and protocols of the MKultra programming, right in your face. See, they need to BREAK YOU DOWN SEXUALLY. Then build you back up, gay, angry, soulless, and willing to do anything YOUR HANDLER TELLS YOU TO DO OR ELSE. Cbswork - June 2004

Hitler was a sexual deviant who would do anything to hide his sexual proclivities from the public. This made him a puppet to any foreign country or ideology with the knowledge on him. This is known as "the wood" on a person and anyone with 'the wood' has control over that person. ......Hans Mend: "In 1915 we were billeted in a brewery and slept in the hay. Hitler was bedded down at night with Schmidtl, his male whore. We heard a rustling in the hay. Then someone switched on his electric flashlight and growled 'look at those two faggots'.....Many of the highest-placed leaders in the Nazi party, including IHitler, Roehm, Forster, von Schirach and almost all of his bodyguards were gay. Hitler surrounded himself with homosexuals and even retrieved Roehm from Bolivia, making him Deputy Fuhrer. This knowledge enabled outside countries like Britain and ideologies like the Freemasons to control Hitler, his high command and his bodyguards. Hitler and his band of merry bandits became puppets with wooden strings. In this way, any foreign society can be destroyed with a leader hiding their sexuality. Hitler, Roehm, Forster and von Schirach took part in destroying their own societies while enjoying the power it gave them. Hitler was a double agent prime minister. He worked for a foreign country (Britain) and a foreign ideology (the Freemasons). The formula proved so effective it is still used today, in politics and the media, especially with TV personalities, radio announcers, prime ministers and presidents, both male and female. Hitler was a British Agent by Greg Hallett p.65

The belief in the occult world is if you could sodomize God, you’d get God’s power. You become as gods through sodomy; that’s the way the Greek gods became gods. Alexander the Great was a great sodomizer and his Greek army was the most fierce. Hitler tried to pattern his SS and military after the Greek warriors using sodomy. When you put that all together, the civilizations that God wiped out boiled down to the practice of sodomy. Deprogrammer Interview with Marion Knox: In the House of the Strongman, Sodomy is the Key - by Elana Freeland

The British Intelligence officers on the course, told us that the Romans had sodomised him because they thought it would be a laugh to be inside of somebody who claimed to be 'God'. The male British Intelligence officers and graduate trainees were to do the same to all of the British Intelligence recruits. Each and every member of the course, was at some point either raped or sodomised by the programmers or graduate trainees. Sometimes this was done in public, in front of the whole team of recruits.

Ray Starmann #fundie usdefensewatch.com

What do the Presidential Candidates really think of Obama?

Sanders – If you think Obama is left wing, you ain’t seen nothing yet. Wait until Comrade Bernie Sanders is elected. I will rally the proletariat to destroy the military-industrial complex, ransack the banks and restore a people’s pure revolution to this nation. It will take time; the progression of communism is long and arduous. If the populace has to live in complete misery for the next 500 years, so be it, the march of the revolution will move forward. To the gates, comrades!

Webb – President Webb here. How much more of this Candybutt in Chief can anyone stand? This country needs Jimmy Webb to take Kim Jong Un by his Sha Na Na hairdo and give him some old fashioned Marine Corps wall to wall counseling inside the Oval Office. What the hell am I doing in the DNC? I don’t shop at Whole Foods. I don’t do yoga and I don’t wear Birkenstocks! Help me Obi Won Priebus. Take me back!

Hillary – Barry doesn’t like me. Let’s just say the trouble started at the last Winter Solstice Party in the White House when I had a little too much egg nog and I gave Michelle the look, if you know what I’m talking about. Huma does. Bill definitely knows what I’m talking about. Why do you think there was Monica and a couple thousand other floozies? Obama also knows that I sent about 500,000 classified emails through that unsecure server the hipsters put in the Colorado john. I hope those guys can keep their mouths shut, otherwise I’m going to Vince Foster them into oblivion. I am winning this election because I deserve it!

O’Malley – I met President Obama yesterday in the Oval Office for the first time. He thought I was the cable guy! No, sir, I told him, I’m the Governor of Maryland and a Presidential candidate. He asked me, for President of what? Nice guy, he showed me a bottle of fake tears he got from a buddy of his in Hollywood. He said it worked great for yesterday’s gun press conference. Wouldn’t it be cool if we could ban all guns? We’d be so much safer!

Trump – Obama you’re fired! God, I wish that loser was on my show. I wouldn’t put him on Celebrity Apprentice. I wouldn’t put him on the regular Apprentice. I’d put him on Bum Apprentice. The guy couldn’t even last for five minutes on Let’s Make a Deal. Old Monty Hall would have s-canned him in the aisle and sent him backstage. He’s sold us out to the Iranians, the Russians, the Mexicans and he’s letting ISIS run rampant around the globe. Pretty good work for a guy from Kenya if you ask me. BTW, Barry O, why do you have a Connecticut social security number if you born in Hawaii? Speaking of foreigners in the White House, how about my good buddy Ted Cruz, who was born in Canada?

Jeb – I’ve already had a chat with the President. When my campaign finally implodes and my mummy and pappy turn off the Bush money fountain, I’ll have a job! President Obama, who sees eye to eye with me on many issues, has spoken to some friends of his in the TV world. I’ve been cast as Norman Bates dressed as his mother in a Bates Motel spin off. I am psyched!

Cruz – Count Chocula here. Thank God President Jughead is out the door in a year. When I’m elected I will bring in my friends, Frankenberry and Booberry to cabinet positions. President Cruz will dynamite the Iran Deal the first ten seconds I’m in office. I will incinerate Obama’s gun control executive orders. I will launch a massive Dresden style 10,000 plane air raid on ISIS in my first hour in office.

Rubio – Hey, Rubio here. I’m pumped. Just drained another case of Red Bull, mainlined some Hostess Cupcakes and finished watching Obama speak about gun control. The guy enrages me so much, I feel like the Tasmanian Devil. I just want to spin into the White House at 2,000 mph and become the President. So what if I look like I’m captain of the high school debate team. I’m a US Senator.

Christie – I shouldn’t really be saying this, since I am a Republican and a capo de capo in the Zamboni crime family, but I like Obama. Maybe it was all that hugging after Hurricane Sandy. Maybe it’s the fact that he liked my mother’s Cannoli’s. So what, the guy’s a flaming liberal, a disaster foreign policy wise and hasn’t done one thing to help the economy. As far as I’m concerned, he’s an honorary citizen of New Jersey, Exit 22.

Carson – Dr. Feelgood here. I know I have pretty much no chance of being elected, and look totally stoned most of the time, but what the heck. I get a lot of free food, alcohol and female groupies. Plus, it gives me time to air some of my skeletons to the public. Did I tell you the time when I stabbed a kid in 3rd Grade with a Ticonderoga Number Two pencil? Went right into his chest cavity; I performed my first tracheotomy. Oh, wait, I was supposed to talk about Obama. Gotta go. Got the munchies.

Mateo1970 of NY #fundie usnews.com

Homosexuality in the clergy

I don't think it should surprise us that there are so many homosexuals in the church hierarchy. I think any institution that symbolizes masculine authority attracts men struggling with same-sex attraction disorder. Few people know that among the military services, the Marine Corps has the highest percentage of gay men. Many of us have struggles with homosexual thoughts and even acted out on them. It in no way means we are gay. That is strictly a political designation. A man can love other men and even sexually penetrate them as an act of male bonding, yet still maintain his heterosexual identity. As long as you don't defend the militant lifestyle like the extremist liberals, then you can be proud of your manhood.

Richbee #fundie christiandiscussionforums.org

300 "global warming" Spartans, Al Gore, Liberals and Islamist Extremism

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Discuss this dramatic contrast:

* Liberals believe that anthropogenic global warming is real and Islamist extremism is a hoax.

* Conservatives believe that Islamist extremism is real and anthropogenic global warming is a hoax.

When the next post-9/11 attack of Islamist extremism occurs, as it surely will, who would you rather be standing behind: Al Gore, with his carbon offset certificate-shield raised high in one hand and his florescent-tube spear in the other, or a member of the United States Marine Corps, Army, Navy, or Air Force?

Personally, I would feel safer protected by one genuine G.I. Joe than 300 Al Gores.

Randy Orton #fundie patheos.com

Taking shit from dishonorably discharged WWE Wrestler Randy Orton

Shortly after the public conversation, I had an encounter with another recruit. I am not sure if you watch WWE wrestling. I don’t but if you do, you might recognize the name Randy Orton. He was one of the squad leaders in my platoon.

I am a rather small guy, even more so back then. I was probably about 5’8? and 120 pounds. Double Rats recruit FTW [JG: this means he got to eat twice as much food, civilians.]

I was doing pull-ups on the quarterdeck during some free time. When I hopped off the bar, I turned to find this huge future wrestler glaring and blocking my path in an imposing manner.

He uttered the words, “You better believe in jesus, boy.” I was shocked. I wasn’t sure if he was trying to make a rational argument, or if he was trying to bully me into Christianity. Whatever it was I decided it was the worst attempt I had ever faced. Instead of engaging him, I just laughed in his face until he walked away.

After boot I hear he received a Dishonorable Discharge for going UA and telling his CO to fuck off. [JG: I confirmed the discharge. He received a short prison sentence for his crimes in the Marine Corps followed by a bad conduct dishonorable discharge.]

sadoeconomics #fundie sadoeconomist.tumblr.com

Can you give a good reason why you believe child pornography ahouldnt be illegal? Because to me it sounds like youre justifying child rape in the name of "anti-censorship"

I’m not doing that at all, and you shouldn’t put scare quotes on anti-censorship.

First, let’s go over a few incidents. Recently, I heard about an acquaintance of mine whose 16-year-old son’s 17-year-old girlfriend attempted to send him a topless selfie but instead accidentally texted it to her neighbor, an old lady who freaked out and called the police. And the first reaction of the police was to begin the process of indicting ALL THREE OF THEM for possession of child pornography and adding them to the sex offender registry for life - and it’s only because the girl’s dad was a golfing buddy of the chief of police that it ended with all of their cell phones being confiscated and wiped instead. Does this sound like a reasonable way of dealing with this situation? Were all of them child rapists? How much prison time should you get for the crime of receiving an unsolicited JPEG file exactly?

Let’s consider also the Playpen incident last year, which was what prompted that post you’re probably responding to, in which the FBI ran a sting operation that disseminated a massive amount of child pornography through the dark web, which was so badly mishandled that very few people they caught downloading real hardcore child rape pornography can be prosecuted. The US federal government is itself unquestionably the biggest distributor of child pornography there is. This is the same federal government that ran COINTELPRO, MKULTRA, the Tuskegee syphilis experiments, etc. And they are now headed by Donald Trump, who is one of several political figures who went to Jeffrey Epstein’s private island before Epstein was convicted of trafficking in underage prostitutes. Donald Trump of the Republican Party, which recently had Dennis Hastert as the Speaker of the House, who has since been convicted of raping an underage boy. And let’s not even get into all the shit the Democrats have been caught doing. Are these the people you trust to fairly enforce these laws? Do you think it would be difficult for any three-letter agency to put child pornography on your computer without your knowledge if they wanted to, so they could prosecute anyone they wanted and claim they were secretly a pedophile, to destroy their reputation? Is that a power you are comfortable with Donald Trump and the deep state having? They haven’t been willing to legally define ‘pornography,’ even. Having laws forbidding certain combinations of ones and zeroes hands those people a blank check to destroy whomever they wish.

Let’s go back to what prompted my personal interest in this whole debate, which was the relationship I had with an older woman when I was 16 - when I had a job, I was going to college, I was allowed to drive a multi-ton motor vehicle, I was talking to a recruiter about joining the Marine Corps, etc. but had no access to many other legal rights arbitrarily withheld from people under 18. If she had sent me racy photos of herself or vice versa, well, she might still be in prison today. As it was, we carefully avoided putting her at risk for two very long years until I was 18, at which point we had a rather normal romantic adult relationship for several years that ended amicably, that I look back on fondly today. As the person who was supposedly protected here by being forcibly kept apart from the person I loved, how do you think I feel about the state’s interference in our relationship now? If you guessed ‘immensely resentful even after all these years,’ you are correct. Would it have been child rape on her part if I had sent her a picture of my naked body unprompted? Does it make any sense that I could pledge to sign several years of my life over to the military at that age but I couldn’t send someone a picture of myself? Do you get how that experience molded my opinion on the subject and made me willing to speak out on the subject even if it meant people would call me a pedophile?

One of the most famous home movies in history is the Zapruder film of the Kennedy assassination. We’ve all seen it, right? But it’s photographic evidence of a crime. Shouldn’t we all be charged with condoning the murder of the president for watching that footage, by your logic? Surely you agree that murder is worse than rape. Shouldn’t possessing media of a person being killed be illegal, if possessing media of a person being raped should be? And if animated or drawn child pornography is illegal, shouldn’t possessing any movie or video game in which a person is shown being killed be grounds for imprisonment as well? The logic that you folks use has implications far beyond this subject, but you never really pursue those implications (and you shouldn’t, because they’re insane).

My point is, that’s because you’re fabricating unsound legal principles here to support the existence of this unjust, unconstitutional law (probably because anyone who questions it gets accused of being a pedophile, and you don’t want to wind up with clueless anons accusing you of justifying child rape, for example), instead of coming up with law based on sound legal principles. In any other context, anyone would tell you that possessing a picture or video of a crime is not the same thing as committing the crime yourself and the harm was entirely in the original crime, not just watching it. Are you justifying robbing convenience stores by saying it shouldn’t be illegal to watch America’s Dumbest Criminals? And if we took that principle to extremes it’d suppress important political speech - for example, after Vietnam the American media was pressured by the military to stop showing images of US soldiers in body bags, and as a consequence we’re more emotionally isolated from the wars currently being waged and information about the circumstances of the deaths of soldiers has been kept from the public ‘out of respect.’ Laws against pornography were used not so long ago to suppress information about birth control and sex education. It’s not unimaginable that there’s something important we’re not being allowed to know about, or that we’re all afraid to discuss, because it’s been declared child pornography. Censorship is absolutely something you should be afraid of in any form, and even well-meaning censorship can inadvertently suppress the truth. A free society, especially a democracy, depends on open access to information to function and I’m skeptical of anything that nibbles at that around the edges, even for the noblest of causes. These things always have chilling effects on expression far beyond their official limits as well. If some JPEGs can be illegal it requires all this machinery of surveillance and enforcement that can be just as easily used to suppress other things, and if we don’t trust the state, which we shouldn’t, we shouldn’t be comfortable with that machinery of censorship existing at all. We can’t trust them to stay within their mission - look at all the NSA personnel spying on their girlfriends instead of terrorists. Look at how the state has far outgrown its constitutional bounds. Stopping a few fucked up people from getting access to their preferred masturbation material is not worth having to give Leviathan access to all of our digital communications.

I am an anarchist. I discuss radical libertarian politics here. That’s why I’m against this law that’s been abused so much, the enforcement of which has been a massive travesty of justice for decades. Not because I’m ‘trying to justify child rape.’ My ideology is rooted in the nonaggression principle, which rape obviously violates. Do you think I should take the position of ‘we need to remove all power from the government except the power to prosecute people for child pornography?’ There’s no exception here to my general critique of the state. And what do you think would happen to child rapists in Ancapistan, anyway? ‘Hunted for sport’ is my guess. A convicted child rapist would probably not be able to retain the protection of a DRO (I’ve conjectured for a long time that that might be the one thing all of them would refuse to deal with) and they’d have the status of a medieval outlaw, they’d have no legal protections - likely a de facto death sentence with all the people who’d be lining up to kill them. Meanwhile, the state plays catch and release with child rapists - go check the sex offender map and see how many live in your community right now, I dare you.

Anyway, Anon, you are the unwitting pawn of someone who has started a harassment campaign against me, who has accused me of all kinds of other ridiculous vile shit in the past few days as well, and sent messages encouraging me to commit suicide. They dug up a post from nearly two years ago and reposted it outside of the context of the ongoing debate we had had, triggered by the revelation that the FBI had disseminated a massive amount of child pornography on the deep web. I had explained all of this back then in even greater detail, but then someone sent me an anon asking me about banning violent porn and I made the mistake of mentioning my position again without that context, so it could be misinterpreted by people unfamiliar with my ideas.

So yeah, I don’t condone raping children, I’m not a psychopath, I just really don’t trust the government, in large part because there are so many actual child rapists at the highest levels of government, and I think we can do better than the current system. I hope this clarifies my thinking for you.

Steve Moxon #fundie stevemoxon.blogspot.co.uk

Utterly crazy sex law exposed by Adam Johnson's sentence – indeed, his conviction, and that he was ever charged

Adam Johnson has done absolutely NOTHING wrong. He was vigorously pursued by a female who was several years beyond the age of puberty, who knew perfectly well what she was doing, and was well equipped (as evolution has equipped all girls) to deal with it. In most other countries she would have been over any 'age of consent'. She facilitated and very willingly engaged in not sex but merely a mild sexual fumbling. The girl chalked this up as a sexual feather in her cap that she used to get her a lot of brownie points within her peer group. Enter the police, CPS and judiciary, and suddenly the girl was put in the position of inadvertent anatagonist to a famous footballer. As is so often the case, the queen bee and wannabes of her peer group seem to have decided she needed to be brought down a peg or two, and turned on her to invert her female prestige to 'slut' status, and consequently, with the collusion of the police and the CPS, she backtracked to try to make out that a little sexual fumbling with a A* male she found supremely attractive, somehow was 'damaging' to her and even non-consensual. It was, in no respect whatsoever, either. She suffered zero damage of any kind from Adam Johnson. Any damage -- and clearly there was damage to her -- was from the peer group she'd been so keen to impress and, most particularly, by the police, the CPS and the judiciary.

It is a 100% travesty that there was any charge against this man, let alone a trial, never mind a conviction and criminal injuries compensation paid to not the party who was the victim here. The victim was Adam Johnson. Everyone else involved were the perpetrators in this case.

With the average age of female puberty having fallen since Victorian times from 17 to ten, yet the legal 'age of consent' has remained at 16, then the law is an abomination and will have to be changed. It is scientifically illiterate to claim that a 15-year-old is a child. Not only have her bodily changes complete, but mental changes ensue actually before physical ones, so the claim of sexual immaturity is completely false. And why is the 'age of consent' 16 when the age of criminal responsibility is just ten? The answer: age ten is rationally deemed to be the end of childhood per se, whereas the additional six years beyond age ten represents deep-seated anti-male prejudice and sexual prudery.

We live in not neo-Victorian so much as uber-Victorian lunatic times where all men are considered far game to punish severely simply for having male sexuality. It is an atrocious disgrace, and the extreme hate-mongering ideology behind it is not long for this world

John Smith #racist socialmatter.net

The genocide of white men is coming. The executioners will be other white men, usually with sociopathic tendencies, employed by your local police department. It is well known, and blessed by SCOTUS, that a person can be too smart to be a cop (Google the New London case). The police are now militarized with heavy equipment. Combine massive killing power with sociopaths at the controls and you get genocide.

My father was a Marine Corp fighter pilot of the WWII generation. He thought himself a great American patriot. In reality, he was the perfect Nazi storm trooper. He would always side with those in authority (institutions, the powers that be) over the individual.

There is no doubt in my mind that if my father, the great American patriot, was alive in 1776 he would have been a Tory because rebellion and freedom was not his credo. His credo was obedience to higher authority.

There is also no doubt in my mind that if he had a Corsair in 1776 he would have gladly annihilated the embattled farmers at Concord and Lexington. If the embattled farmers of 2016 dared to march on Washington he would gladly strafe their convoys, because he had been ordered to and if for some reason his plane crashed he would die knowing in his heart he was an American hero and patriot.

My father is emblematic of the white American Gestapo that will gladly kill their white countrymen without thinking about what color will fill the power vacuum left when white men have been reduced to the remainder of the genocidal Gestapo. They simply cannot grasp such a thought.

And this is the insurmountable problem. The white race will complete its suicide (begun in WWI) within the next two generations. Nothing can be done to stop it. Historical forces are at work.

The future is yellow and brown. Blacks think they will succeed when whitey is gone. They will be sadly mistaken. Yellow and brown will inflict atrocities upon their people that would make Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot blush. Demographics is destiny. Prepare yourself.

James Laffrey #racist whiteswillwinparty.org

How To Kill jews

A Military Manual’s Instructions

For Every Able White Man

A need exists to further instruct and inspire our fellow White men who hesitate because of uncertainty and lack of confidence.

Every able-bodied White man will immediately see the value in this information and know how easily and effectively he can employ it.

“Kill Or Get Killed, Pt 1” (linked below) is the name of the publication in pdf form. When we open the pdf, we see that it was published by the U.S. Marine Corps, and inside it tells us that much of the info was first published during WW2. Here is an image from the top of page one:

[image]

Now, we are not interested in “combat.” And we are not interested in “disarming the enemy” nor in “handling of prisoners.”

We are interested in the quickest, surest, quitest ways to incapacitate and kill our enemies infesting our towns, cities, states, and country.

Therefore, I present here only those.

Chapter 2 is titled “Offensive Unarmed Combat.” That’s what we want.

[images and text excerpts]

What could be simpler and sweeter than the above combination of a stunning karate chop to the back or side of the neck followed by the quick arm-around and breaking of the neck. All of the advantages are here. No cry out in pain that might alert others. No struggle. No blood. Quick. No weapons. No evidence.

[...]

Now, boost your confidence by knowing a superb defensive action in case of need — for example, against Negroids who you may desire to disable but not necessarily kill. The Kick To The Knee. Keep in mind, this will be noisy, as the target will shout in pain. The kill comes with the follow-up move, which is a stomp on the windpipe to crush it. Or first a kick to the neck/head to stun the target before the final kill move.

These are very simple actions. Be sure to practice them in secret to enhance your strength and hone your accuracy with hand and foot. Think about where your intended target(s) will be: standing at a urinal, or standing at a car door, or sitting on a park bench, or sitting at a desk, or other. For practice, use a soft piece of furniture and/or a pillow against something at the appropriate height. Be careful: Don’t injure yourself while practicing!

Confidence will come quickly.

[...]

If you have time, take cash as an extra reward or as needed income. (If so, don’t leave fingerprints; likely wear very thin gloves). Take no evidence. Leave no evidence. Tell no one. Enjoy the pride. Know that you have joined the ranks of our heroes. Our White wave will grow.

[...]

Do unto jews before they do unto you.

Begin with easy targets. Be stealthy. Be efficient. Tell no one. Feel the pride. For further advice, such as simple elements of disguise, see articles linked at the bottom of this site.

Whites Will Win.

W. F. Price #sexist web.archive.org

" Again, your movement could gain a lot for ground if you would actually focus on male issues. At this point you’re just perpetuating the thing you claim to be fighting against.

I don’t think you realize how reactionary and misogynistic you guys come across as. Go on any mainstream forum, and plenty of men and women will agree that there are male issues while being disturbed at the misogyny and therefore distancing themselves. Also, call out the Eivind Berge rhetoric.

-yoyo"

Yeah, sure, you want us to do the 90s all over again. Fat lot of good that did. When men who had their kids taken from them for no good reason fought it, next thing we knew we were being called the “abuser lobby.” That’s all I need to know about feminists. Go ahead and call us names all you want, but be advised that we’ve caught on to that game.

Unconditional surrender is all I’ll ever accept from feminists. It’s better than they deserve, but I’m a humanitarian kind of guy, so I’ll give them that opportunity when the time comes.

"I promise you, that taking a break from reactionary sites and going out into the world will be way more productive. And again, WF, since you have a daughter, PLEASE consider joining a fathers support group. I understand why you think the way you do, but blogging on a reactionary blog like this one isn’t going to make things better for you, your daughter, or humanity in general."

You want to bring my kids into this? Typical feminist trash. My daughter’s happy being who she is – a girl – and that’s fine by me. I’m not going to try to shove her into the US Marine Corps like you sick bastards. Nor will I tell my son it’s righteous to cut off his balls and wear a dress.

You know what?

Fuck you.

Now get out of here.

Dave Blount #conspiracy moonbattery.com

Anyone familiar with Obama’s radical background will find this Facebook post by author Jim Garrow as believable as it is terrifying:

I have just been informed by a former senior military leader that Obama is using a new “litmus test” in determining who will stay and who must go in his military leaders. Get ready to explode folks. “The new litmus test of leadership in the military is if they will fire on US citizens or not”. Those who will not are being removed.

Garrow is a respected activist who was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize for his work rescuing baby girls from one-child China. His source is “one of America’s foremost military heroes.”

This certainly gives the urgent drive to disarm law-abiding citizens some perspective. It could also help us make sense of massive ammunition purchases by the increasingly frightening Department of Homeland Security.

According to the testimony of FBI informant Larry Grathwohl, the Weather Underground crowd that launched Obama’s political career estimated they would have to exterminate 25 million “diehard capitalists” to impose communism on America. This would be done at “reeducation centers” (a.k.a. concentration camps, gulags) in the time-tested oligarchical collectivist tradition.

In possibly related news, Obama is abruptly firing the head of Central Command, Marine Corps General James Mattis. General Mattis has been accused of asking too many questions regarding the Obama policy toward Iran. Could be he wasn’t willing to give the order Obama expects the next four years of Hope & Change to make necessary, and that the Oath Keepers are prepared not to follow.

Once the final pieces are in position, all that remains is for Obama to collapse the economy, Cloward-Piven style. A few more $trillion in wasteful spending should do the trick.

Vox Day #fundie voxday.blogspot.com

If there is one lesson, just one, from all of Martin van Creveld's books, it is that technology does not guarantee military victory. Here is a vivid comparison that shows why things are looking rather grim for the US military if it is ordered to intervene in the Middle East for a third time in three decades in order to take on the Islamic State there:

1. Let Transgender Troops Serve Openly by THE EDITORIAL BOARD. The Pentagon’s ban on transgender troops is based on obsolete policies and must be rescinded. The Williams Institute at the U.C.L.A. School of Law, which researches gender issues, estimates there are about 15,500 transgender troops serving in uniform.

2. Using Violence and Persuasion, ISIS Makes Political Gains. Amid punishing American-backed airstrikes, the Islamic State militants have advanced in Iraq and Syria using a dual strategy of purporting to represent Sunni interests and attacking any group that vies to play the same role.
Military history clearly demonstrates that the side that executes homosexuals, whether throwing them off buildings or having their fellow soldiers beat them to death, reliably defeats the side that allows its soldiers to dress up and pretend they are women.

Yes, wealth and technology are on the side of the crossdressing military. But attrition, geography, and history are on the side that does not tolerate effeminacy.

It's true that the US military roundly defeated the Soviet-trained, Soviet-equipped Iraqi army twice, the second time largely without a fight. But then, the Islamic State has defeated the US-trained, US-equipped Iraqi army.

Warren Davidson #fundie rawstory.com

A Donald Trump-backing Ohio Republican is defending his claims that “moochers” and “pretenders” are overwhelming the Veterans Affairs’ health care system with fraudulent claims — even though there’s little evidence of abuse.

Rep. Warren Davidson (R-OH) suggested earlier this week at a town hall event in West Chester, Ohio, that some veterans who sought care from the federal agency weren’t as worthy of treatment than others, reported the Journal-News.

“Just like workers comp out here’s got moochers, I wish that there were no vets that were the same sort of problem on our society,” Davidson said. “But part of the problem is there are some vets that are moochers and they’re clogging up the system, and we do as taxpayers want to make sure the VA filters out these folks that are pretenders. Just like we wish there were no people out there with stolen valor, but that’s a problem in the vet community, too.”

The Army veteran and first-term congressman from Troy, who won a special election to succeed former House Speaker John Boehner, drew strong criticism from the GOP chairman of the House Veterans Affairs Committee.

“I can only hope that Rep. Davidson misspoke, and I look forward to him clarifying his remarks,” said Rep. Jeff Miller (R-FL).

The national spokesman for the Veterans of Foreign Wars also slammed Davidson for his remarks.

“Honorably discharged veterans with service-connected wounds, illnesses and injuries, or who are indigent due to circumstances beyond their control, are not moochers,” said the spokesman, Joe Davis.

But Davidson, who has introduced legislation that would require all members of Congress and their staffers to receive health care from the Department of Veterans Affairs, said he meant what he said.

“As a veteran, I know the subpar care that many of my brothers and sisters in arms have received, and I will not be content until that is changed,” Davidson said. “Any effort to suggest I have anything other than a soldier’s passion for providing our veterans with the care they deserve is dishonest.”

His spokesman cited four cases of VA benefits fraud uncovered this year, all of which were prosecuted.

Only one of those four cases involved VA health care services, when a California man falsely claimed to be a decorated Marine Corps veteran to get health care benefits and other assistance.

The Inspector General’s Office investigated 14 cases between Oct. 1, 2015, and March 31, 2016, which resulted in five arrests.

Davidson was among four Republican congressmen who gave interviews promoting Trump on a white nationalist radio host during the Republican National Convention.

Vox Day #fundie wnd.com

It is perhaps useful to think about heaven and hell in terms of utility rather than fairness. If God has a purpose for man beyond the grave and is distinguishing between those He finds useful for that purpose and those He does not, and if man has been created with an immortal soul, then obviously something must be done with those immortal souls who have been determined to be of no use to Him. This logic answers Rob Bell's simplistic concerns regarding the fate of Gandhi and anyone else deemed "good" by humanity; their perceived goodness during their time on Earth is totally irrelevant with regard to their eternal utility in the eyes of God. This should not be a difficult concept to grasp, as even the best Mixed Martial Arts fighter in the world is not considered to be of any value whatsoever to the United States Marine Corps.

Dr. Doom #racist occidentaldissent.com

Do not UNDERESTIMATE the HATE that the darkie has for the White Man. In a second term, he is likely to abolish the Marine Corps which are Lily-White and replace them with ZULU’s Pink Panthers and Ghetto Gangbangers.
There is talk of Drastic Military Cuts that he will make in a second term. All the cuts will probably be White Troops.
The GOP will protest the cuts, but afterwards the darkie will probably replace them with his kind of Turds. The New Turd Army will be Totally Anti-White and armed with the latest machine guns. Ready and Willing to Attack the White Suburbs and get them some of that White Pussy and Shit!

IFA_MTBL, randomaccount22223 and OneDayMorePlease #fundie reddit.com

(OP by IFA_MTBL)
The fact that feminists find the men they claim to be against (non sensitive, hypermasculine, misogynistic alpha males) is proof that feminism is nothing but a massive shit test

(randomaccount22223)
This is why you pay attention to a woman's actions and not her words. She claims to want men who act like feminine pussies but loves to get fucked by the dominant 6'4 Alpha. Guys are told to shun traditional masculinity but this behavior is a repellant to females.

(OneDayMorePlease)
If you're a feminist in the west you're probably fucking retarded and a trash species. What a joke of movement for a joke of a species. The welfare species as I like to call it. Depending on men since the beginning of time. Females need to return to being Comfort Females. That is their sole purpose in the universe.

Triweekly Antifeminist #fundie triweeklyantifeminist.wordpress.com

The esteemed commentator Chinzork wrote:

For one of the first posts on this blog, I think you should debunk all of the common talking points against abolishing the AOC. The talking points get repetitive after a while, so an article debunking all of them sounds good.

Alright then, you got it. Herein is a compilation of the 15 most popular Blue Knight arguments, each argument followed by a thorough dissection thereof.

#1: Teenagers only become sexually mature after completing puberty around 16.

This is a wholly metaphysical proposition; a statement of belief. The Blue Knight starts out from the premise that a “completion of puberty” is a prerequisite for this nebulous state known as “sexual maturity,” then makes the circular argument that, because a 13-year-old has not yet completed puberty, he or she are thus sexually immature. “Sexual maturity” is an altogether arbitrary concept, and there isn’t any way to measure it or test it.

The Blue Knight makes it seem like he or she has objectively examined the issue and reached the conclusion that the age of “sexual maturity” just so happens to start when puberty is over; but there has not actually been any such objective examination of the issue – it simply has been assumed (axiomatically) that this is the case, and the whole “argument” proceeds from this unproven, arbitrary, and essentially metaphysical assumption.

The Blue Knight argument posits that 1) without “sexual maturity” sex is harmful and as such should be illegal; 2) a full completion of puberty is a prerequisite for “sexual maturity.” You may well give the following counter-argument, accepting — for the sake of discussion — the former premise, while rejecting the latter, and say thus: “children become sexually mature after completing adrenarche around the age of 9.”

Fundamentally, however, I have seen no evidence whatsoever that a “sexually immature” person is necessarily harmed (or victimized) by sexual relations merely due to being, according to whatever arbitrary definitions one uses, a “sexually immature” person. I suspect that, as a matter of fact, “sexually immature” people often enjoy sex and benefit from it even more than the so-called “sexually mature” folks. And again, the very distinction between “mature” and “immature” is altogether metaphysical in this regard, like the distinction between “pure” and “impure” or “holy” and “unholy.” It is hocus pocus; theology not-so-cleverly disguised as biology.

According to Blue Knight “morality,” an extremely fertile 15-year-old female should be prevented from sex (because “sexually immature”), while a 55-year-old female who has no ovaries left should be free do get fucked however she likes. It is very clear that such a “morality” is really an anti-morality; it is against what is biologically natural, it is against human nature specifically, it is degenerate, and it is detrimental to the interests of civilization and the TFR.

#2: The Age of Consent protects young people from doing things (sex) which they don’t really want to do.

I have seen no evidence that young people “do not really want” to have sex. On the contrary, I have seen, and keep seeing, that young people greatly desire to engage in sexual activities. That is why they engage in them. If 11-year-old Lucy is a horny little slut who enjoys giving blowjobs to all the boys in the neighborhood (many such cases), the Age of Consent does not protect her from something which she is reluctant about doing; it prevents her — by deterring men from approaching her — from doing something which she does in fact desire to do.

The Age of Consent is simply not needed. Think for a moment about young people. Do you not realize that they are just as eccentric, and can be just as wild, as older people? Why is it that when a 19-year-old chick randomly decides to have an orgy with 3 classmates after school, that is okay; but when a 12-year-old chick likewise randomly decides to do just that, oh noes, she is a “victim” of a horrible crime? We accept that each person is unique, independently of age; and we realize that there are children –not to mention young adults — who are very much into X while others are very much into Y. Why, then, should it be so “shocking” when it turns out that some children, and plenty of young teenagers, are very much into sex? Being interested in sex is arguably one of the most natural things there are, on par with being interested in food; certainly it is more natural than being interested in physics and chemistry and mathematics, right? If we accept the existence of child prodigies, children who are naturally driven to pursue all kinds of weird and special callings, why can’t we accept that there are indeed lots of children who pursue the very natural thing which is called “sex”?

Young teenagers have extremely high sex-drives, and the idea that they “do not really want sex” is contradicted every single moment. This is all the more remarkable given that we are living in a puritanical, prudish, sex-hostile, joy-killing, pedo-hysterical, infantilizing society; yet teenagers manage to overcome this intense anti-natural social programming, and do what nature commands them to do. “Child innocence” is a self-perpetuating myth, which society shoves down the throats of everyone all the time since age 0, and then uses this self-perpetuating myth which has been forcefully injected into society’s bloodstream to argue that “oh gee, young people just don’t really want to have sex.”

The entire entertainment establishment is concomitantly brainwashing children to remain in a state of arrested development aka infantilization, while conditioning the consumers of this “entertainment” to only find old women attractive. That’s one reason why I believe that we must create Male Sexualist aesthetics – we must reverse the brainwashing done to us by the entertainment complex. The television box is deliberately hiding from you the beauty and the passion of young teenage women, and is actively engineering your mind to only find older women attractive. And yet, despite there being a conspiracy by the entire society to stifle young sexuality, young sexuality lives on and thrives. Well, not really “thrives” — young sex is in decline, which conservative total dipshits blame on pornography rather than pointing the finger at themselves for propagating a climate that is extremely hostile to young sexuality — but it still goes on, to the consternation of all Puritans and Feminists everywhere.

Blue Knights claim that young teenagers are “peer-pressured into sex.” This assumes that your average teenager is asexual or close to being asexual, and thus would only engage in sexual activities if manipulated into it by his or her environment. The reality, meanwhile, is that those 12-year-old sluts who have orgies after school time (or during school time) are often as horny as a 16-year-old male. They are not being pressured into sex – they are being sexually restrained by a society that is terrified of young sexuality.

#3: Young people who have sex grow up to regret it.

First of all, when the whole of society is determined to portray young sex as a horrid thing, it is no wonder that people — especially women, who possess a herd mentality — arrive at the conclusion that they’ve been harmed by it. If young sexuality were presented in a positive light by the media-entertainment-state bureaucracy-academia complex, people would be more inclined to remember it fondly than regretfully.

The second thing is that it doesn’t even matter. People feel regret about doing all kinds of things – so what? Does that mean that for each and every case of such “regret,” society needs to go on a witch-hunt for “victimizers” in order to inflict punishments upon them? It’s time to grow the fuck up and accept the fact that people sometimes do things which later on they regret doing, and that this is an integral part of life, and that the state has no business protecting the civilians from “bad feelings.” That’s literally what this Blue Knight argument boils down to – “the state should punish men because women experience negative feelings due to their own behavior.” No, women should learn to deal with their bad fee-fees without demanding the state to find “abusers” to penalize. We are living in a totalitarian emotocracy (rule by emotions) and I’m sick of it.

Also: what is the difference between feeling regret about fucking at 13 and feeling regret about fucking at 17? Women generally feel bad about promiscuous sex (hence the phenomenon of “regret rape” false accusations), and they feel it at the age of 21 as much as at the age of 11; actually, older women may be even more regretful than young ones about sexual activity, because they’v been longer exposed to Puritan-Feminist brainwashing, and because their biological clock ticks much faster. So, according to the victimization-based morality of Blue Knights, men who sleep with 23-year-olds should also be punished. Again, the Blue Knights want men imprisoned solely due to some vague negative fee-fees felt by some women. This is emotocracy in action. No wonder that testosterone and sperm counts are in sharp decline – society is ruled by catladies, and is structured according to catlady morality.

The state simply should not protect people from the consequences of their own behavior – and here “protect” means “punish men,” and “consequences” means “vague negative fee-fees.” Our society is severely infantilized by the victimization-based morality, and infantilization is degenerate.

#4: Young sexual activity is correlated with many bad things.

That may or may not be so, but what are the implications? Generally, people who are natural risk-takers will do all kinds of things, some of which may be positive, others negative, and still others just neutral. The conservadaddy making the “correlated with bad things” argument implies that punishing men (and women) for young sex would somehow reduce those negative things supposedly correlated with young sex. That, of course, is bullshit. If a risk-taking 12-year-old decides to have an orgy with her classmates, she will remain just as much of a risk-taker whether or not her classmates or other people are punished. Depriving her of the opportunity to take “sexual risks” won’t diminish whatever other risk-taking behaviors she is prone to.

The thing about Blue Knight arguments is that they aren’t arguments at all. There is no logic in stating “young sex is correlated with X, and X is bad” and then using that to support the criminalization of young sex. This is the same logic used by pedagogues to justify pedagoguery, only in reverse: the pedagogues argue that education is correlated with intelligence (as measured by IQ tests), then use that claim to imply that education makes people smarter, and therefore everyone should undergo education. This is a wholly fallacious argument. At the risk of sounding like a spergtastic redditor goon – correlation does not imply causation. The Blue Knight argument is not an argument at all. It’s plainly illogical.

By the way, I’d say that there are plenty of negative things correlated with young sexlessness – such as growing up to be a school shooter, for instance. You’ll never hear Blue Knights discussing that.

#5: Some Statutory Rape legislation allows teenagers to have sex among themselves, and only prohibits older people from predating upon them.

This argument typifies what I call the “victimization-based morality” aka “victimology.” The people making it assume — against all the available evidence — that within any relationship between a young person and an old person, the former is necessarily victimized by the latter.

The individuals making this argument (usually you’ll hear it from women) will often tell you that it is “creepy” for older men to be interested in young women. They will pretend that young women are exclusively attracted to young men, when in reality they are attracted to men of all ages – to men as old as their father as well as to their classmates. My own life experience confirms this, as I personally, in-real-life, know of women who fucked significantly older men when they were aged 14-15. It was all passionate and voluntary and enthusiastic, believe me. And the many accounts you can find on the internet leave no doubt that it’s common for young women, pubescent and even prepubescent, to be sexually attracted to significantly older men.

It is important to stress the point that the women themselves pursue and desire those sexual relationships, because the Blue Knights have created the false impression that the entire argument for abolishing the AOC rests on our attraction to young women, an attraction which according to the Blue Knights is completely unreciprocated; whereas in reality, it is incredibly common for young women to initiate sexual relationships with men as old as their father. It takes two to tango – and the tango is quite lively indeed. Given the sexual dynamics elucidated by Heartiste, wherein women are sexually attracted to “Alphas,” it makes perfect sense that young women would be sexually attracted to older men even more-so than they are sexually attracted to their peers, since older men possess a higher social status than young ones, relatively speaking. Again, life experience confirms this.

Thus, there is no sense in punishing old men who fuck young women, unless, that is, one embraces the whole “taken advantage of” argument, an argument which relies on a denial of the biological and empirical reality on the ground, and simply defines (as an axiom) all relationships in which there is a “power imbalance” as “exploitative.” That is, there is no evidence that any “exploitation” is taking place in such relationships, and Blue Knights assume its existence because they refuse to believe that young women can be horny for older men.

Also, the Blue Knights will bring up argument #1 to “substantiate” argument #5, and argue that due to the “sexual immaturity” of the younger party, the older party must be forbidden from being in a sexual relationship with it altogether – because otherwise there may be “exploitation.” Again, the moment you realize that a 12-year-old female can be as horny as a 16-year-old male (who are, needless to say, extremely horny), the idea that the slut is prone to be “sexually exploited” by a sexual relationship with a man who is statistically likely to be high-status (and thus naturally sexually attractive to her) become absurd. And as we’ve seen, the whole “sexually immature” line is ridiculous – it has never been shown that maturity, for whatever it’s even worth, is reached at 16. In saner, de-infantilized times, 12-year-olds were considered to be mature, were treated as such, and evidently were mature. Hence my saying: “child (and teen) innocence is a self-perpetuating myth.”

#6: You only support abolishing the AOC because you’re a pervert.

A common ad hominem. Now, it is expected that possession of a naturally high sex-drive would be correlated with sexual realism (i.e. being woke about the reality of sex), because a high sex-drive individual would be much likelier than a low sex-drive individual to spend hours upon hours thinking about the subject of sex in its various and manifold aspects. But that only goes to prove that it is us, the “perverts,” who were right all along about sex – and not the catladies and the asexuals who haven’t ever thought about sex in realistic terms because they never had any incentive to do so. Our “bias” is a strength, not a weakness.

There really isn’t anything else to add here. When they accuse you of being a pervert, just agree & amplify humorously: “oh yeah, I jerk off 8 times each and every morning before getting out of bed – problem, puritan?”

#7: You only support abolishing the AOC because you are unattractive and trying to broaden your options.

Also known as “projection.” Well, actually, there also are men who make this argument and not just dried-out wrinkly femihags, so let’s address it as if a man said it. Again, this is an ad hominem that presupposes that your motivation to engage in sexual politics of the Male Sexualist variety is merely your desire to improve your personal situation in life. Now, even if it were true, that 1) wouldn’t matter, because what matters is the arguments made and not the ostensible motivation behind them; 2) there is nothing essentially wrong with trying to improve one’s situation in life – and “there are no rules in war and love.”

By the way, abolishing the AOC, by itself, is not going to get all of the incels laid over-night. There are other measures that must and will be taken to ensure sexual contentment for all of society. Abolishing the AOC is a crucial part of the program, but it’s not the single purpose of Male Sexualism, in my view. What I personally would like to see in society is maximal sexual satisfaction for everyone. There are many ways to try reaching that point.

Anyway, the point is that “you are motivated by a desire to increase your options” is not even true regarding most of the prominent Male Sexualists. Presumably. I won’t speak for anyone else, but I’m married, and very satisfied with my great wife.

14376_7
Big Beautiful Women are not for everyone, but I’m cool with it. In this scene from the Israeli film “Tikkun,” my wife — who is an actress — plays a prostitute. Sorry, Nathan Larson, I’m not sending you her nudes; this one should suffice.
As a matter of fact, as I wrote in one of the last posts on DAF, my own kind of activism would not be mentally possible for me if I were not sexually satisfied. I’m not driven by a personal sexual frustration; on the contrary, as I keep saying, what drives me is essentially a spiritual impulse, which has awoken to the extent it has as a result of getting laid.

#8: If you support the abolition of the AOC, it’s because you’re a libertine who believes in “everything goes.”

Some Male Sexualists are, unmistakably, libertines – and proud if it. However, others are faithful Muslims. The notion that opposition to the AOC must necessarily be tied to libertinism is nonsense. Look at traditional European societies 350-300 years ago – almost none had an AOC at all, yet they were hardly “libertines.”

This Blue Knight line is somewhat related to the “LGBTP” meme – they think that we are Progressives trying to advocate for pedophilia as part of a Progressive worldview. I think that it’s safe to say that no one in Male Sexualism belongs to the Progressive camp, which is the camp where Feminists and SJWs reside. That said, some versions of libertinism (sexual libertarianism?) aren’t so bad, anyway. As TheAntifeminist said in a comment at Holocaust21:

[M]y utopia as a male sexualist would be somewhere like 1970’s Sweden or Holland.

This is a legitimate view within the movement.

#9: If young people are allowed to have sex, their innocence will be ruined; sex is exclusively for adults.

Here we see the Enlightenment-spawned Romantic idealization of “childhood” as a period that, due to whatever values one attaches to it, must be preserved against encroachment and incursion from the “fallen world of adults.” This is the Romantic basis of modern-day infantilism.

It used to be understood that the purpose of “childhood” is growing up into adulthood. The so-callef ‘child’ should be made into an adult, should be given adult tasks, adult responsibilities, and — all the sooner — adult rights. Today, society does just the opposite, and infantilizes people with a historically unparalleled intensity. That’s the result of elevating “childhood” into an ideal form. No wonder that now, it’s not just teenagers who are called “children,” but people in their 20s. That’s the process of infantilization which society goes through.

As usual, conservative dipshits, addicted to their own Romantic conceptions, claim that “actually, children are not nearly infantile enough these days.” They don’t see the pervasive “kid culture” that has completely zombified kids into being basically a bunch of drooling retards; no, what the prudish-types care about is “MOAR INNOCENCE,” as usual.

Fact is, kids today are not shown anything about the real world; a whole culture of idiocy, blindness, silliness, and clownishness has been erected like walls all around them. It is the culture of the TV channels for kids, the culture of Toy-Shops, the culture of child-oriented video games. Muh “birds and bees.”

Look, I get the temptation to indulge in infantilism. In fact, I’m probably a hypocrite, because I haven’t yet begun doing anything to de-infantilize my own 19-month-old son. He, like most toddlers, also watches the stupid TV shows and has all of these damn toys all over the place. It’s not easy resisting the ways of the system. But the real problem is that society is not structured in a way that allows children to be de-infantilized. When people only get a job at 18 or at 21 or they are NEETs, and there is an age-ist Prussian School System that is mandatory and which brainwashes its prisoners to believe that “school is good,” and Feminist careerism is pushed on all potential mothers by the media-entertainment-state bureaucracy-academia complex, it’s no wonder that people are very immature nowadays. That only goes to show how radically modern society must be transformed, in my opinion.

To get back on point: “childhood” and “adulthood” are both fictional concepts. These may be useful fictions, but they are still fictions. The telos of childhood is adulthood. It’s a transitional state, and if we must choose an arbitrary age when childhood should be officially and finally over, that age should be 9. That is, if we discover that 10-year-olds behave in an infantile manner nowadays, it’s because their parents — and, crucially, society at large — have not properly de-infantilized them. It’s a wholly artificial state of affairs, rooted in Romantic delusions.

Young people should have sex, because young people should experience real life in order to become functional adults; and an integral part of real life is — and should be — the sex life. Far from constituting a “problem” for young people, sexual intercourse is one effective way for getting young people to see the broader picture of reality. Deprived of sex, ‘kids’ grow up with warped and unrealistic notions about reality, and suffer dysfunction as adults. They don’t get to learn what’s important and what’s unimportant in life when they should learn it – young. Getting laid gives you a mentally clear vision of priorities in life, gives you a clarity of mind which allows you to deeply reflect on what’s actually going on in the world. Sex is necessary for young people, whose one and only task is to — repeat after me — become adults. Sex is a fundamental part of a fulfilled adult life.

#10: Young sex leaves young people traumatized.

No, it doesn’t. The ‘trauma’ stems entirely from being repeatedly and incessantly told by Blue Knights (Puritans, Feminists, Conservadaddies, Catladies, etc.) that a horrible crime has been committed against you by a wicked individual, that you have been “taken advantage of,” “deprived of innocence,” “ruined forever,” “sexually exploited,” “abused,” and the rest of the victimological jargon. The sex itself and the relationship itself feel good, and are indeed good biologically and psychologically; they bring fulfillment to one’s life and a satisfaction for one’s fresh and burning biological needs. The whole “trauma,” such as it is, is inflicted by society on the younger party, due to society’s strict adherence to a victimization-based morality.

That’s why I call for a Moral Revolution. This is not a troll. As long as people adhere to a victimization-based morality that sees “power imbalances” as inherently and fundamentally victimizing, people won’t be able to think logically about young sexuality. The current prevailing system of social morality must be replaced with a new one. Once that is achieved, all of this “trauma” — which is inflicted by the Blue Knights on horny young people — will dissipate and evaporate altogether

Young people greatly enjoy sex, and will go to great lengths to achieve it, overcoming the very many mechanisms of sexual oppression established by Blue Knights.

#11: Young people don’t know what’s good for them, and therefore need to be protected from risky situations.

If young people don’t know what’s good for them, it’s because society itself has successfully destroyed their ability to know what’s good for them. I mean, by the age of 10, a person should have a basic idea about what life is all about. If that’s not so for most or all people, something is deeply rotten in society.

And the reason for this indeed being the modern state of affairs is exactly because the protectiveness of parents, combined with wholesale cultural infantilization, has rendered young people incapable of independent thought. Thus, instead of “MOAR PROTECTION,” young people need infinitely less of it – so that they will learn to deal with reality.

And at any rate, sex is not as risky as the Blue Knights claim it is. They scare people about STDs, but then the solutions to that problem are well-known, and are completely independent of age – if instructed properly, and possessing a responsible personality, a 10-year-old can behave just as carefully — if not much more carefully — than many 40-year-olds.

Then there is the issue of pregnancy. First of all, what I wrote in the above paragraph about responsiblity applies here as well – the pregnancy-avoidance methods are well known. Secondly however, there’s a great differences in here: pregnancy is not a disease. It’s not a bad thing, but a good thing. I support young pregnancy and young parenthood. That is the primary “risk” which Blue Knight scare-mongers warn about, and I don’t see it as a risk at all. Instead of being protected from reproduction, people need to be instructed about how to reproduce. I once wrote, trollishly as usual, that if there should be any schools at all, then the “homework” of young females should be getting impregnated. The essence beneath the statement is on-point: pregnancy is good, because reproduction is good; fertility is good, while sterility is bad.

So, in my view, young people should not be protected from the “risk” of pregnancy. They should be instructed about it, made to comprehend the how’s and why’s of it, and then allowed to use their mind-faculties to figure-out what should or should not be done. That’s the gist of any de-infantilization program.

#12: Young people don’t desire to have sex.

Young people do, as a matter of actual fact, very much desire to have sex; much more-so, even, than many old people.

#13: If the AOC is abolished, parents will no longer be able to control their children.

What is the purpose — the very raison d’etre — of parental control over children? To turn children into functional adults, so as to allow them to form families and continue the bloodline. This cannot be achieved by hindering the ability of children (or “children”) to engage in the one thing that marks the arrival of maturity – sexual activity. Sexual activity is the thing that most unequivocally transforms an un-developed person into a developed person. Since the purpose of parenthood is the creation of adults, parenthood should serve to (at the very least) give-way in face of the natural maturation of children, rather than artificially prolonging “childhood” in order to extend the period of parental control. Parental control is only good insofar as it allows parents to facilitate the de-infantilization of their children; when, as in our deplorable times, parental control is used to exacerbate the infantilization of children, it is in the interest of society to tell parents to fuck off.

Since parents these days abuse their parental power and authority by artificially prolonging the infantilization of their own children, the abolition of the anti-natural AOC is exactly a thing that is needed in order to put parental control in check. The power of parents vis-a-vis their children must be drastically reduced when the child reaches the age of 8. That’s usually the age when sex, reproduction, and marriage all become relevant. If you want to argue that 8 is still too young, perhaps (maybe) we can compromise on 10. Point is, between 8 and 10, parental power should be dramatically restricted.

As a 23-year-old father, I can tell you that parents and family in general continue to significantly shape your life long after you cease being under “parental control.” An abolition of the AOC won’t result in all teenagers running away from home never to be seen again. But it will, God willing, result in the establishment of many new young households. That is something that we should strive for – getting teenagers to form families. That is the meaning of creating adults.

#14: Without an AOC, there will be grey-zone situations of child prostitution.

Child prostitution should be legal.

#15: Abolishing the AOC will increase pre-marital sex, which is a bad thing.

First of all, I couldn’t care less about whether or not sex is “pre-marital.” I had fucked my wife and impregnated her before we were married; so what? What matters is the bottom line: the creation of a patriarchal and stable household.

The second thing is, people today marry extremely late, and many forgo marriage altogether. This is related to the war against young sexuality: not reproducing when young, people struggle to reproduce when old; and living in sexlessness until the late teens or early twenies (or until later than that), a total sexual dysfunction takes over society, and people find it difficult to form long-lasting relationships at all. Young love shines the brightest, the younger the love, the brighter it shines; couples who start young last longer than those who start old.

Puritanical Blue Knights have brought about the plummeting of the TFR in Western Society. In my view, pre-marital sex should be accepted, as long as everyone involved understands that the purpose of any “romance” is the formation of a household. Early teenage marriage should be encouraged, and if early teenage sexual intercourse facilitates that, so be it – it’s all the better. It is not sex that is harmful to young people; sex is good for them. It is sexlessness that is the central and overarching problem of our times.

In conclusion
Man, that was exhausting, I gotta say. But hopefully, this post will serve as a guide to answering Blue Knight talking points. All of you must remember this: before you can annihilate Blue Knightism, you must mentally internalize what it is that we Male Sexualists believe in. In moments of uncertainty and doubt, consult this post, and you may find the core idea needed for you in order to formulate your own Male Sexualist position about any given issue.

There is a new revolution on the horizon. I don’t know how long I personally have left in this world. Perhaps the intelligence operatives threatening me will decide against killing me, or maybe they’ll slay me this very night. Who knows. What I want you to do is to take the ideas provided on DAF and now on TAF, understand them, and spread them. This is not a cult of personality or a money-making scheme. This is a political movement that has its own ideas, ideas that may initially appear groundbreaking but which in reality may also be primordial, ideas which we hope will be implemented in reality – be it 30, 80, or 360 years from now. At some point in the future, somewhere on the face of our planet, there will be a Male Sexualist country.

If during the next half-decade we manage to bring into the fold both edgy 4channers and 8channers (“meme lords”), and serious, intelligent, competent, affluent, deep-thinking, and strategizing supporters, we will be able within several decades to achieve our political objective.

David J. Stewart #fundie jesusisprecious.org

I was listening to the radio station of a local independent Baptist church today. They kept singing, “Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, I love you Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, I love you Jesus, Jesus, Jesus.” It made me nauseous, sick in my heart to hear their lukewarm hypocrisy! The reason why is because the church officially uses two Bibles: the Easy-To-Read Version (ERV) and the King James Bible (KJB). (By the way, the King James is not a “version,” it is God's inspired and preserved incorruptible words.) The church published a dual Bible several years ago, featuring the two Bibles, one corruptible and the other incorruptible. They use the corruptible word to interpret the incorruptible word. TALK ABOUT MESSED UP AND CONFUSING!!!

I actually heard the church's neo-evangelical associate pastor throw it in my face, that because of my fundamental beliefs it was adversely affecting my social life. He's right, and rotten to say what he did, but I love him in Christ anyhow! Truth has few friends these days! Since when should we make our decisions where to stand for God on the basis of social acceptance? Id rather have no friends, than to sinfully compromise as a sorry neo-evangelical rascal, pulling on the same rope as the Devil. You see, neo-evangelicals don't want to suffer reproach for Christ. They don't want to be outside the gate with Jesus! That's why they won't take a stand against Satan's counterfeit Bible versions. That's why Bob Jones University won't stand. That's why Moody Ministries won't stand. That's why neo-evangelical independent Baptist churches won't stand. And may I say, such bad churches are “fundamental” in name only. Genuine independent fundamental Baptist churches (in English-speaking nations at least) are KING JAMES BIBLE ONLY!!! And they expose the Devil's corrupt Alexandrian Bible revisions, based upon the heretical work of reprobates Brooke Westcott and Fenton Hort.

It makes God spit neo-evangelicals out of His mouth when they sing, “Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, I love you Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, I love you Jesus, Jesus, Jesus,” while using, tolerating and promoting Satanic Bible revisions that belittle the only begotten Son of God!!!

Lashonda Wilson #sexist medium.com

I feel sorry for you Darcy. You got raped, you hold a victim’s mindset and found the only man that would give you a sense of control in what you probably felt was an uncontrolled world, a Beta Male. Yes there are Betas and Alphas. My husband is an Alpha, but I can tell you there is no inequality there is harmony.
I don’t mask any latent anger as feminism. We have a healthy sexual relationship too. We laugh, share, dance and keep each other on point.
My guess is you and your Beta go to art shows, read the NY times together, and share a healthy dislike for the current President. You aren’t complicated, you are simple.
The one thing I hope is that you don’t have kids. To bring them up in a man hating, leftist, anarchist house with no good male role model is a recipe for a troubled human.
My guess is you either come from a divorced home or your Dad wasn’t present or maybe he was abusive, there is definitely some Daddy issue stuff going on. I don’t expect you to analyze yourself, clearly you are right and your Beta male…. well his thoughts don’t count anyhow. All your “feminist” friends will champion your positions while if you really stopped, took a long, long look in the mirror you would see a sad girl looking back. That isn’t going to change unless…. you do and then if you truly gain the courage to look at yourself your Beta will no longer be attractive to you, thats the real Red Pill.

SaidAbdullahofDarfur #fundie islamicaweb.com

[Dubai3000: Talibans and Alqeada ruined the whole islamic image.]

Far from it.
Their actions brought many to Islam, myself Included, The Taliban, Saved thousands of Lives in Afghanistan, and Al qeada brought hundreds, maybe thousands to Islam, Many converts, Like me when they were young heard about 9/11and these so called "terrorists", the ones that refused to take the medias word as law did their homework, and like that female captive of the Taliban that converted, they all found Islam.

Old Man #fundie iidb.org

No & no, I would never contemplate becoming "friends" with one. They physically repel me. In any case, given that I believe all unrepentant homosexuals over 21 ought to be executed, they are hardly likely to want to be friends with me.

Mike King #conspiracy tomatobubble.com

No one gets to become President of the United States without at least a partial blessing from one of the rival factions that constitute the kosher "powers that be." Unlike some of our brethren in the "conspiracy theory" TM community, Sugar and I, er, "The Editorial Board" of The Anti-New York Times, as much as we have supported the campaign of Orange Man, have always cautioned that elements of the ultra-nationalist, anti-Globalist Zionist International have thrown their weight behind Orange Man. The likes of the thoroughly despicable warmongers Sean Hannity, Not-So-Brightbart News, Matt Drudge (cough cough) and Julian Assange work primarily for Bibi Satanyahu, not the American people.

1- "Conceived in Israel," Breitbart News (Image 1 shows original cast posing with Bibi) boasts of its Jewish credentials: "Breitbart was founded by Jews, is largely staffed by Jews, and has an entire section dedicated to reporting on and defending the Jewish state of Israel.” -- Breitbart's Jewish CEO Larry Solov -- responding to an attack from the Clinton camp after Orange Man had hired Breitbart's executive chairman Steve Bannon as campaign manager. (here)

2- Orange Man won the endorsement of mega-Zionist Sheldon Adelson (cough cough) -- the casino mogul and "long-time friend" who once suggested that the U.S. drop an atomic bomb in the Iranian desert as a warning shot.

Matt Drudge is a Zionist agent, as are Gentiles Sean Hannity (shown in image 2 viciously attacking peace candidate Ron Paul for being an "isolationist") and Hannity's new friend, Julian Assange --- whose latest "leaks" helped to sink Killary Clinton.

With regard to Orange Man, the question here is not whether or not he will reward his Zionist-Likud backers; but rather: how far will he go to keep them happy? Will he limit the payoff merely to the controversial relocation of the U.S. embassy from Tel Aviv to contested/divided Jerusalem and the killing of any "two-state solution?" Or will Orange Man's Zionist agents, either with or without his consent, set us on the path toward war with Iran? --- an event that would turn into a disaster and certainly derail the expected "bromance" between Putin and Orange Man.

Only time will tell -- but the appointment of a Zionist fanatic who has already, on his own, started talking about "tearing up the Iran deal" and "increasing aid to Israel" -- as Ambassador to Israel is cause for us to tone down our on-again-off-again applause machine for Orange Man. Some excerpts from the article itself, co-authored by Isabel Kershner (cough, cough) and Sheryl Gay Syolberg (cough, cough) are very revealing.

Yentas Kershner & Stolberg tell us about how extreme David Friedman is. You see, only Jews are allowed to write critical articles about other Jews.

Kershner & Stolberg: He is president of the American fund-raising arm for a yeshiva in a settlement deep in the West Bank headed by a militant rabbi who has called for Israeli soldiers to refuse orders to evacuate settlers.

Analysis: Friedman is not content with what was already stolen from the Palestinians. He wants more and more and more.

Kershner & Stolberg: He writes a column for a right-wing Israeli news site in which he has accused President Obama of “blatant anti-Semitism,” dismissed the two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, likened a liberal American-Jewish group to “kapos” who cooperated with the Nazis, and said American Jewish leaders “failed” Israel on the Iran nuclear deal.

Analysis: Evidently, even these yentas think Friedman is nuts.

Kershner & Stolberg: Now, David M. Friedman, an Orthodox Jewish bankruptcy lawyer from Long Island, is Donald J. Trump’s pick for ambassador to Israel,..

Analysis: Orthodox, eh? Just like Orange Man's trusted and influential son-in-law, Jared Kushner.

Kershner & Stolberg: Their (Trump & Friedman) relationship was cemented in 2005, friends said, when Mr. Trump traveled three hours in a snowstorm to pay a condolence call on Mr. Friedman after the death of his father, a prominent Long Island rabbi.

“He was very taken by Trump spending almost all day just to pay the shiva,” said Yossi Kahana, one of the two friends who described the visit, using the Hebrew term for the week of mourning. “Barely any people came, and here is Trump, coming and sitting with him and talking about things that are important to both of them, their values, their fathers and their legacies.”

Analysis: An admirable gesture on the part of Orange Man, but such personal closeness is not a good sign for the people of Palestine or Iran.

Kershner & Stolberg: A person close to the Trump transition who spoke on the condition of anonymity said the ambassadorship had been negotiated directly between the two men over many months. Mr. Friedman, who donated a total of $50,000 to the Trump campaign and the Republican National Committee in 2016, according to federal election records, had been openly saying even before the election that the job — one of the most sensitive and high profile in the diplomatic corps — would be his, according to friends.

Analysis: So, "the ambassadorship had been negotiated directly between the two men?" Since when does the boss "negotiate" with the prospective appointee? And the talks took place "over many months?" That means that the negotiations happened during a time when few believed that Orange Man could win. Perhaps the "two old friends" and other parties unknown (cough cough) knew something in advance that the rest of us did not?

Kershner & Stolberg: Israel’s conservative settlement supporters and their American backers rejoiced at the selection, ...

Analysis: It's true, boys and girls. Orange Man is a hero to the Likudniks of Israel.

Trump has a huge fan club in Israhell!

Kershner & Stolberg: He refers to the West Bank by its biblical name, Judea and Samaria, ...

Analysis: As an "ortho," Friedman literally believes that the Almighty gave him "Judea and Samaria."

Kershner & Stolberg: something hard to imagine his predecessors doing publicly. Upon being nominated Thursday night, he said he looked forward to working “from the U.S. Embassy in Israel’s eternal capital, Jerusalem,” rather than Tel Aviv, where the American Embassy has been for decades, under the State Department’s insistence that the holy city’s status be determined as part of a broader deal between Israel and the Palestinians.

Analysis: Orange Man to the dispossessed Palestinians: "Kiss my New York ass!"

Kershner & Stolberg: Baruch Gordon, the director of development for Bet El Institutions, told Arutz 7 on Friday that it was “proud to be closely associated with Mr. Friedman,” calling him “a pioneer philanthropist and builder of Jewish institutions and housing projects in Judea and Samaria (a.k.a. the ‘West Bank’) and throughout the country.”

Analysis: a "builder of Jewish institutions and housing projects in Judea and Samaria," eh? Ya can't get any more "to the right" than this Zionist!

The ever-interloping ultra-nationalist West Bank "settlers" are the most vicious little demons to be found in all of Jewry -- and, unlike their Globalist brethren, they absolutely love Orange Man.

Brave Orthodox Israeli settlers mock and abuse Arab woman.

Drunken Orthodox Israeli settler to British film crew: "Screw you, you Nazi! We killed your fucking Jesus and we are proud of it. .. This is my land you son of a shit. God gave it to me. ... I'll kill you and the Palestinians. Fuck you, Nazi.... God gave it to me and fuck you." (video here)

Kershner & Stolberg: Mr. Friedman’s connections to Israel date back to his bar mitzvah at the Western Wall.

Analysis: Friedman is not really going to be America's Ambasador to Israel, but rather, Israel's Ambasador to Israel. Talk about "rigged," eh Orange Man?

Kershner & Stolberg: A senior Palestinian cleric, Sheikh Ikrama Sabri, said during Friday Prayers that if Mr. Friedman managed to move the embassy to Jerusalem, “the U.S. is declaring a new war on the Palestinians and all Muslim Arabs.”

Analysis: What does Orange Man care about offending Muslims? Pardon the liberalese-sounding lingo here; but anti-Muslim bigotry won Orange Man a whole lot of FOXtard voters.

Kershner & Stolberg: Daniel C. Kurtzer, who served President George W. Bush as ambassador to Israel from 2001 to 2005, was alarmed by the appointment.

“He has made clear that he will appeal to a small minority of Israeli — and American — extremists, ignoring the majority of Israelis who continue to seek peace,” .... “Friedman’s appointment as ambassador runs directly contrary to Mr. Trump’s professed desire to make the ‘ultimate deal’ between Israelis and Palestinians.”

Analysis: Orange Man knows damn well that without the Zio crazies and their formidable apparatus in his corner, he would never have been able to overcome the pro-Killary Marxist-Globalist faction of the PRC (Predatory Ruling Class). Let us hope that the political payback will be limited "only" to the sellout of the poor Palestinians, and not to a new collision course with Iran.

But if Orange Man, on the basis of some future false-flag attack, decides to start the usual crap with peaceful Iran, count on the The Anti-New York Times to write some really nasty stuff about him.

And Orange Man, if you're reading, be assured that if and when your "long-time friend," is faced with a choice between serving your interests or those of Satanyahu's ghoulish gang, you will be outmaneuvered and dumped like a red-hot matzah-ball quicker than you say, "Oy vey!" And the same goes for that snake-in-the-grass Orthodox son-in-law of yours.

Ivanka had to convert to Orthodox Jewry in order to marry fellow billionaire Jared Kushner. The influence of the young couple on Orange Man is common knowledge, as is the affection that Bibi "9/11 was good for Israel" Satanyahu and Orange Man have for each other.

Hesse Kassel #fundie #sexist returnofkings.com

10 THINGS YOU MUST TEACH YOUR FUTURE DAUGHTER
[…]
Hesse Kassel is an Australian economist. He stopped chasing money and chased women and made children instead. He blogs right here[http://gametobreed.com/]

Once a man can see and deal with the bad side of modern girls himself, the next question is obvious. How does he prevent or limit the infestation in his own family? How does he produce the better kind of daughters that are now so tragically rare?

The first thing to realize is that remaining silent and hoping things will work out is really just surrender. Perhaps there was a time in the past when most of the messages your daughter received in the outside world would have been positive and things might have worked themselves out. That is certainly not true today.

Your daughter’s information will come from school, external childcare, TV, computer time, time with friends, time with other family members, homework, books and songs. Most likely every one of those channels will be jammed full of negative messages. That’s one of the reasons there are so many girls around who are tattooed, pierced, overweight, childless, slutty office drones.

Luckily there are lots of things a man can do to help steer his daughters in the right direction. One of those is simply to talk about better, clean, and appropriate ambitions for girls. But this is not easy to do. It’s ineffective to simply bring up the topic for a serious talk out of the blue. The best way is to wait for an example or opportunity to present itself, then just hang a comment about it out there for her to hear.

It’s a bullseye if she picks it up, responds, and makes herself receptive to follow up, but don’t try to force it. Here are ten which I find effective at presenting positive, family-oriented ideas to girls and which can be endlessly repeated while retaining their impact.

1. No girl can be happy until she is a mother
[Picture of a woman holding a toddler]
[caption: happier in the office?]
The beauty of this statement is that it’s of wide application and so easy to justify. After all, what girl doesn’t have or observe situations where she or another girl is unhappy with something in her present life? Every time school, or friends, or work are hard for a girl, just imply that her dissatisfaction will be healed when she is a successful, happy mother.

2. Why would a man want to spend his life with a bad woman?
[picture of a teenage girl raising her middle finger, caption: Perfect a good time, not for a lifetime]

Every girl naturally wants to be loved and treasured by a high-value man for her whole life. Even the most dreadful feminists generally conceal that as their secret aim. So every time a disgusting troll heaves herself into view, shows her dreadful personality or displays a horrible bit of decoration, point out the offense. It can be kind of fun to notice and describe what doesn’t make a man want to spend his life with a girl. It’s also very effective for teaching young girls about what is a good idea and what is not.

Occasionally it will even lead to an opportunity to say something about the difference between the short term interest a man might show for the troll and the better, longer term kind he shows for the better girls.

3. Girls are better than boys at looking after families
[picture of a scantily-clad woman wiping the floor. caption: No man could make a kitchen look this good]

Be sparing in trying to tell a girl that she just doesn’t have physical ability, temperament, or time off from being a mother to be a SAS commando, astronaut, or fire fighter. It’s an uphill struggle and may end up encouraging her to trust the legions of people who will tell her she can and should do anything a boy does.

Instead, flip the problem over and spend time praising the things she can do better than boys. She will love to hear all about it.

4. Some things are just for boys
[picture of a young girl (~5) playing with a construction truck toy]

Wait until she is failing or resenting being made to act like a boy. When she really, really wants to hear that she doesn’t have to, just casually mention that it is for boys anyway. She will jump at the chance to do something more feminine and love it.

5. It’s sad to see so many girls wasting their lives on study and work
[Picture of a woman at the computer. Caption: Caution! Wall ahead]

Beating men at the job of being men is now the favored “role model” for our society to present to girls. Never tire of pointing out what a waste of a girl’s life that is.

6. It’s good to have a big family
[Picture of a family photo with dozens of people]

Nearly every message she receives from the outside world, even from other relatives, will state or imply that fewer or no children is better. She will be encouraged over and over again to use contraceptives and even abortion. People will try to scare her into thinking she needs to be impossibly rich before she can afford to be a mother. People will ridicule large families as failures, trailer trash, and welfare queens.

Give her some opportunity to hear a positive word about having children.

7. We don’t do that in our family
[picture of a woman with a shirt saying “all about that cock”. caption: None of that around here, thank you]

Appeals to identity are powerful means for persuasion. Does it make sense? Not really. Does it work? Absolutely. Just keep mentioning the fact that our family and by implication she is too good to fall into whatever form of degeneracy is in view.

8. What we need is ladylike behavior at all times
[picture of the victorian painting “Tristan and Isolde”, depicting an arthurian knight sitting with a regal woman]

Ladylike is a good word to connect to positive femininity. It hasn’t suffered from being redefined by leftists much, everyone seems to understand what it means in a positive way, and a father can be fairly sure he will have the word to himself. The fact that it’s a bit out of fashion and consequently means much the same thing it did in the past is a huge advantage.

9. Being a mother is the most important job for a girl
[Picture of a woman in gym wear holding a baby]

Another good answer to the assumption that the study and areer track is the meaning of life is to simply state that there is another, more important job for each and every girl.

10. A girl needs to start her family as soon as possible
The rest of the world will try to trick your daughter into wasting the best years of her reproductive life on an arts degree followed by a pointless career and endless fiddling with iPhones. At best there might be some vague concession to the idea of forming a family and having children “someday.” Be sure that at least one man tells her how stupid that life plan is and encourages her to take a better path.

Men must not be silent
[picture from the ‘Slutwalk’ event]

As fathers we have great influence over our daughters and sons. Children are desperate to learn how to live and to have their behavior approved of by parents. It’s not an automatic process, though—too many men allow themselves to default into silence and surrender that influence. Don’t.

Your daughter’s future depends on it.

bill-11b.tumblr.com #fundie bill-11b.tumblr.com

on the murder of British politician Jo Cox

Golly, gee, oh my, what a shame.
Karma in fucking action. If only Americans had the balls to do the same thing.

[ Bill I understand where you’re coming from, but perhaps a less aggressive approach might make people more sympathetic towards your views, especially in a situation where someone has been killed ]

Except, I don’t give shit about people’s sympathies.
Every dead cultural Marxist is a win in my book.
Of course the left will stand atop her corpse and call everyone who disagrees with them a bloodthirsty savage (unlike the actual bloodthirsty savages they’re in favor of invading their country) but they’d do that anyhow, now they just have the corps to stand on.

[ What the actual fuck is wrong with you?? Oh yeah, kill everyone who disagrees with you. That’s real fucking smart.
Well, it certainly seems to silence the opposition.
]

Your king and my congress disagreed on tax rates… guess why we no longer have a king, and you still do.

Hashtagpls #sexist reddit.com

by early 30s, Asian women are already shengnu, ie noone back home wants them. The quality men that they were waiting for, the gaofushuai, sure as hell dont want a 30-something for a wife. As China's feminist organisation put it, 'the perfect man's out there, but why would he want you?'

Speaking for myself, a woman with a PhD is irrelevant in my estimation of her suitability for marriage; but given that most PhD females tend to be 30-something anyhow ie shengnu, i would look askance at them.

Now, not to say that 30-something AF are a lost cause; they could seek out an westernised AM who isnt as stringent on that as a FOB, or they could lower their standards (HAHA!!). In a way, dating a loser WM like the eg provided is lowering their standards. A lot.

Calligirl #fundie youdebate.com

Do you know why the creationist students are failing in our highschools and colleges? Because most of them teach evolution! If you don't believe in evolution (or at least pretend to) you're history! I have heard countless stories of my friends getting F's on everything from homework to tests because they didn't use evolution as the premisis for their answers. They used God. That is why they are failing.

jvreturns #sexist incels.co

If your a 5, 6 or 7 and u act beta/needy/weak/feminine, that can knock off points and make u incel.

After looks, height, body, dress, u need to act masculine otherwise women
will think u are beta, weak or gay and just use u as a friend.

Only 8plus tall fit men can act anyhow and get away with it.

AznSlacker & mikelee1 #racist urbandictionary.com

Definitions of AMWF

1.

A relationship consisting of an Asian Male and a White Female.

David Kim: There's this commonly held myth that's lately been propagated in American society that white males are acting on some sort of "Asian fetish" that's a byproduct of this country's postcolonial history which leads to an inclination (by white males) to date Asian girls... I don't buy it. After all, what about the other half of the relationship? Even if all of that crap were true, how would this explain why an Asian girl would want to date a white male? Is she not an independent actor in this equation? Is there some postmodern psychobabble that explains a latent desire for her to date someone who ostensibly represents a former colonial master?

Christy Smith: Most of the Asian girls that end up with white guys are pretty ugly and most of the white guys in these relationships are douches. By the way, I'm going to start a AMWF forum on Facebook. Will you join?

David Kim: Okay!

2.

An Asian Male and White Female relationship. The smaller but more balanced counterpart to WMAF (White Male and Asian Female). Instead of marrying for sexual fetishism, race and prestige, most AMWF relationships are built on love, respect and being equal partners. It's two confident individuals rowing against the currents of institutionalized racism. Most AMWF couples have equal educational attainment and bring in similar incomes. As a result AMWF hapa children are also more balanced. The AMWF hapa sons see a well educated and responsible role-model in their Asian dads, and the hapa daughters see a strong, independent and progressive woman in their white mothers.

Mike: Did you notice that most famous and successful half-Asian half-white people are actually a product of AMWF relationships and not the other way around despite being vastly outnumbered?

Lindsey: Yeah, Tim Wu, Chloe Bennett (Wang), and Dean Cain Tanaka are hot!

Anarcho Papist #fundie archive.today

I suppose I should have figured this out earlier, but it seems that feminism is a dysgenic social movement. Why? The mechanism is very simple. From the perspective that women need to “rise up” and “take their place in the world” by taking on what was previously a traditionally male career path, it only makes sense that such a social expectation would be disproportionately placed on women of higher intelligence since, after all, they are “better able to compete.” And perhaps they do, for a time. Those who are able should pursue higher levels of education and career advancement; “to whom much is given, much shall be expected.” It is only a small disappointment for a dumb blonde to settle down in her 20’s and be dedicated to a family, but it is a great disappoint for an intelligent woman to forego her place in the workplace.

But the result of this is that more intelligent women are less likely to pass on their genetic material. As such, it is the less intelligent women who breed, which is a dysgenic effect.

Does it not seem weird that we are effectively saying to our best and brightest women that their most enlightened lifestyle is materialistic nihilism? Get a job, make a bunch of money, be independent. Don’t have children. Die alone without any genetic legacy. Women are to discern their calling to the Spinsterhood. If such a calling is unable to be undertaken, they may receive a dispensation from the sugar daddy government to have children paid for by taxpayers and divorced fathers.

Can we call it that? This generation of feminist spinsters, which by the nature of its prohibition of sexual reproduction, is memetically suicidal. Feminism guarantees its own extinction, because those most likely to live their life according to its precepts also have the most potential to forward it, but these precepts specifically prohibit partaking in the grand tradition of having a family and raising children. They opt out of societal continuity, and so choose their own ruin.

The Spinsterhood: 40+ year old women without children. This population has a higher-than-average intelligence, which means that the following generations are essentially quarantined from both their superior genetic stock, a great tragedy, and their inferior ideological disposition, a great mercy. Women are incapable of ruling the world because as soon as they have some power they immediately use it to secure their own immediate material desires, rather than laying down foundations for the future.
Not having children is selfish and stupid. It is a privilege to have children, a privilege much more available to women than to men. Under a feminist social environment, intelligence in women is an evolutionarily maladaptive trait. That’s strange. Intelligence, maladaptive? Were a eugenics program otherwise touted specifically in order to reduce the intelligence of successive generations, you would be led to think some great evil or psychological disability is afoot.

I imagine it is more difficult to raise the intelligence of a population through successive generations than to lower it. How many generations would it take to cover the ground lost by feminism in a single Spinster generation?

Yet another reason to favor patriarchy: so that successive generations of society may be more intelligent than their forebears. Indeed, within a patriarchal society, the intelligence of a lady actually becomes an attractive quality, since a better intelligence will help her to manage the affairs of the household better. This is certainly at a contrast with female intelligence in a feminist society, where it is a repellent quality, as it is so highly correlated with very un-attractive lifestyles, behaviors, and attitudes.

David Chase Taylor #conspiracy truthernews.wordpress.com

SWITZERLAND, Zurich — Based on breaking news and events, it appears that the Obama administration (at the behest of the CIA in Switzerland) is preparing to execute a wave of race war riots and terror attacks in Ferguson, Missouri in the aftermath of shooting of Michael Brown’s friend Tyrone Harris Jr. by police in Ferguson on August 10, 2015.

The shooting of Tyrone Harris appears to be a CIA-spawned publicity stunt designed to enrage the black community once more so that race war terror attacks consisting of gun-related shootings can take place in Ferguson and elsewhere across America. Consequently, the red blood seen on Harris’ white shirt is likely fake.

The shooting of Tyrone Harris has provided a fresh motive for race riots and race war terror attacks during the civil disobedience march and protest planned in Ferguson, Missouri surrounding the anniversary of the Michael Brown shooting on August 10, 2015.

The notion that the Obama is actively attempting to spark a race war in American was confirmed, albeit in a de facto manner, back on August 22, 2013, when a U.S. Department of Homeland Security employee was caught red-handed promoting a race war against whites within the black community.

Exactly what type of race war attacks are planned for the Ferguson march and protest is not known, but a gun-related massacre involving one or more AR-15 assault rifles is the most likely terror scenario. Said attacks will executed by dirty cops and/or Special Forces (i.e., professional terrorists) posing as domestic terrorists.

That being said, vehicular manslaughter attacks and/or Molotov cocktail attacks are also a realistic possibility. The notion of Molotov cocktail attacks was highlighted on August 3, 2015, by a Fox News report entitled “Man Faces Federal Charges in 2012 Molotov Cocktail Attack on Corrections Center”. Needless to say, redux attacks are likely now in order.

The feds could also engineer a so-called “accident” or “natural disaster” during the Ferguson march and protest (e.g., fire, gas explosion, melee, stampede, vehicular manslaughter, etc.) which would also kill and terrorize hundreds of protesters in attendance.

Since scores of international media outlets will be in Ferguson, the impending race war attacks will predictably be caught on video and subsequently uploaded onto social media platforms (e.g., Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, etc.) where they will be used to terrorize the world for years to come

In what appears to be pre-Ferguson terror attack logistics, it was reported back on July 27, 2015, that the city of Ferguson executed a so-called “unity-minded cleanup effort” in preparation for the anniversary of the Brown shooting. According to reports, the town of Ferguson is “getting a little sprucing”.

Whether the timely “cleanup” provided the necessary cover for the installation of weapons and/or explosives within the city of Ferguson is not known, but it’s highly likely. Said weapons and/or explosives could be utilized at a later date in a coordinated state-sponsored race war terror attack.

In order to put Ferguson back in the national spotlight just prior to a wave of horrific race war attacks and riots, it was reported on August 3, 2015, that the lawsuits filed by journalists over their arrests while reporting on the Ferguson protests were settled.

That same day, August 3, 2015, it was reported that ex-Ferguson police officer and Michael Brown shooter Darren Wilson will give his first TV interview since the controversial shooting. Needless to say, the timely interview was designed to rehash the shooting just prior to a wave of race war attacks in Ferguson.

In what appears to be a preview of gun-related race war terror to come, it was reported on August 10, 2015, that 3 people were shot after gunfire erupted in Ferguson during the Michael Brown shooting anniversary. Said shootings were predicted by Truther.org a day prior.

Back on November 27, 2014, two men were arrested for plotting to bomb the Gateway Arch in St. Louis and assassinate Ferguson officials. Although the men in question were African-American, any future race-related terror attacks in Missouri will predictably be scapegoated onto “racist” white people.

In what appears to a U.S. government military drill specifically designed to disperse crowds in the aftermath of state-sponsored race war attacks, it was reported on April 23, 2015, that U.S. Marines executed a riot control drill in which the soldiers repelled angry protesters with pepper spray and rifles.

Roughly a week later on April 29, 2015, it was reported that American police departments are now stockpiling stink bombs for the next riot. The report was evidently designed to foreshadow the notion that bombs will be used in the next riots, most likely in Ferguson.

The notion that a gun-related massacre of protesters is planned for Ferguson was foreshadowed back on April 29, 2015, when 3 people were reportedly shot during protests in Ferguson. The shootings were executed in order to set the precedent for a deadly gun-related race war massacre.

In order to raise rehash the notion of race war bombings in Ferguson prior to their fruition in reality, it was reported on June 3, 2015, that the suspects in the Ferguson bomb-plot have plead guilty. Consequently, copy-cat-like bombing are now expected in Ferguson.

In what appears to be pre-protester terror attack programming, it was reported on July 22, 2015, that a white man with AR-15 terrified black people protesting a Confederate statue. Consequently, a future scenario in which black protesters in Ferguson are gunned down by white men with AR-15’s is highly likely.

Roughly a week later on August 3, 2015, it was reported that the man accused of setting a small explosion near an NAACP office has plead guilty to arson. The timely plea was evidently designed to coincide with domestic terrorist bombings of African-Americans, most likely in Ferguson.

Also on August 3, 2015, it was reported that professional race baiter and government operative Louis Farrakhan stated that “We must rise up and kill those who kill us”. Needless to say, Farrakhan’s comments were designed to encourage retaliatory in the aftermath of unprecedented race war attacks.

Lastly, it is imperative to note that black males are routinely gunned down in America yet the U.S. government and the CIA-run media only pay attention to select cases. That is because certain cases involving the murder of black males are specifically chosen to provide timely motives for race-related terror attacks that the government plans to commit themselves.

HARVARDCRIMSON12 #conspiracy constantsupervision.wordpress.com

The vagina produces a thick fluid known as copulin that has actual mind control effects on a male’s brain. If a man is exposed to a woman’s copulins, over time she will be able to:

1) Change, remove, or insert memories.

2) Tell the male what he sees, hears, feels, smells, tastes.

3) ?Insert subconscious thoughts that will surface as “his own ideas” or behavior later.

4) ?Plant trigger words or actions that can cause thoughts, actions, or sensations in the male at later dates (days, weeks, even months).

”Karl Grammer and Elizabeth Oberzaucher, researchers who study how the human scent influences sexual attraction, found that when women are ovulating, they produce pheromones called copulins. Copulins have a distinct smell, which Elizabeth describes as “butter that has gone bad.”

When a man gets a whiff of copulins, his testosterone levels rise. As a result, he secretes androstenone, an odor that repels women who aren’t ovulating.”
Through the process of coupling a female and male will lay relatively still without having sex with the penis inside of the vagina. The process may take up to 15 minutes and works faster and more efficiently when the female is on top of the male. During this period the vagina injects up to 1/2 cup (100 ml) of the copulin fluid into the urethral opening at the tip of the penis, which is chemically attracted to semen, and will follow the semen down the shaft directly into the testicles. After 15 minutes of coupling the copulins will have entered the blood stream and traveled from his testicles up into the hypothalamus (a section of the brain that controls hormones) causing the male to become completely influenced by the needs and suggestions of the female.

Once a hypothalamus is flooded with copulins, the male brain is just sitting on idle, with only the bare minimum of thought process. In this state, the male is probably not thinking of anything at all, but any input from the female will become the male’s singular focus.

After multiple couplings:

the male hypothalamus completely ignores his own polypeptides while her copulins are present, even if the female gives no input. Although the male is not forming many original thoughts, the brain is still communicating ideas back and forth; however, these ideas are completely regulated by what the male already knows the female expects.

Some women report having conflicting issues of morality concerning coupling and the effects of copulins producing a false sense of happiness in the male, and others more boldly state they see no problem with coupling and have ”coupled” their husbands while he was asleep. This is usually done in the morning when the male is naturally erect from a relaxing night of sleep. Women have given testimonies about the influence of coupling has on their husbands. For example, they routinely do all the housework and are more eager to spend time with the children.

Playing the field

”Over time, the presence of a womans distinctive copulins and hormonal scent becomes addictive to the male, which is why a young emperor or prince was often given a large number of females that he could rotate between, never allowing himself to become addicted or under the spell of one womans copulins.”

Warning

Copulins are often sold over the counter and online in 100% concentrated form that comes in a perfume spray. This perfume spray will have the same effects on the male as the coupling process and will enhance her ability to control a male.
Copulin sprays create the highest state of sexual euphoria known to man. So intense they can become mind controlling and last for days. Copulins will excite and entice any man or any woman individually, or both genders at the same time. Beware!

Synopsis

You see, the chemistry of a women is to attract humans [in dangerous ways], specifically males and more specifically the sperm, but the scent of their copulins will mentally weaken a person and systematically works to relax them (regardless of gender), artificially making them seem safe. Whether it be to tell them their secrets (instinctively they gather and pass along information this way) or to distract and sexually arouse someone. That’s just how those chemicals effect the polypeptides in the hypothalamus gland of your brain. The colliding forces of copulins will also cause collective thinking in group of women, especially if they are ovulating at or near the same cycle. Fifteen minutes is all it takes for copulins to take over a majority of the hypothalamus gland. Even less time if you are having sex with them . If you are within 3 feet of an ovulating woman or group of them YOUR polypeptides are being replaced at a rate of 5% a minute with THEIR copulins. Yes, you are being chemically drugged by women, even if you are a woman. Over time the brain becomes addicted to a particular scent of copulins, which is why a young emperor or prince was often given a large number of concubines (female sex workers) that he could rotate between, never allowing himself to become addicted or under the spell of one womans copulins. Lastly, when around 80% of your polypeptides have been replaced they will they are able to:

1) Change, remove, or insert memories.
2) Tell the male what he sees, hears, feels, smells, tastes.
3) Insert subconscious thoughts that will surface as “his own ideas” or behavior later.
4) Plant trigger words or actions that can cause thoughts, actions, or sensations in the male at later dates (days, weeks, even months).

Good luck! It’s a jungle out there!

W. F. Price #sexist web.archive.org

Although it’s pretty clear that a lot of the blame for problems in modern relationships can be laid squarely at the feet of young women, we ought to at least ask why they are such miserable failures compared to their grandmothers. They are genetically pretty much the same people, after all, so there must have been something about their upbringing that made them worse than useless as wives. Well, I guess we all know that’s pretty obvious, but how often do we get down to brass tacks and ask “what really makes the difference?”

Having had the dubious benefit of having raised a couple of children for almost five years, much of the time all by my lonesome, I’ve started to get an idea of what’s going on. One thing I can say is that raising kids, although rewarding in some incomprehensible way, is hell. I’ve never had a harder job. Doing it yourself is an exercise in masochism, or maybe martyrdom, which is why I don’t believe all the BS about “single mothers” going it alone. In fact, I’ve never, ever met a single mother who did it alone. Women are better at social networking for a reason: they need to be to get help raising kids.

Nevertheless, modern young women are particularly deluded about childrearing. Most of them have no more experience than a few weeks in total of babysitting kids during the easiest possible age bracket — between the ages of six and twelve. Your typical parent wouldn’t dream of allowing a teenage girl to babysit an infant or toddler for more than a couple of hours, and in that event would do their utmost to set everything up for the babysitter so that it went as smoothly as possible.

So young women come into marriage without a clue. In days past this wasn’t the case. Just as boys in old times would be expected to handle firearms, chop wood, and deal with large, dangerous farm animals, girls would be thrust into the business of childrearing and homemaking as soon as they had the strength to pick up a child and handle a cast-iron skillet. Now, these girls are texting on mobile phones and chatting with friends online all night as soon as they’re done with their homework.

However, the instinct to be a grown woman and mother remains, so girls dream of the traditional marriage without having any idea what it really means. Therefore, as a guy who’s been there and back again, I’d like to give other men an idea of what they really ought to be thinking about if they are serious about a traditional marriage, so I’ve come up with a few questions to ask women before tying the knot:

Can you handle the obliteration of your former physique for at least eighteen months for each child you bear?
Could you drive a car with someone screaming into your ear at a high volume for a prolonged period of time, day after day, without losing your cool and/or crashing?
Would you be able to interrupt your dinner to put your hands on human excrement, and then return and finish eating?
Can you go for weeks without sleeping more than a couple hours at a time?
Are you prepared to handle a 1000% increase in housework?
Can you see yourself acting as impartially as a referee in a boxing match during sibling disputes?
If your sex life were to evaporate, would you still be able to retain a fair perspective concerning your spouse?
Does the prospect of being chained to a few little hellions every minute of the day, at the risk of prosecution if you fail to do so, seem bearable?
Can you sacrifice your shoe budget for family necessities?
Would you be able to control your hormonal mood swings enough to prevent yourself from blowing your marriage sky-high?
Do you have enough sense to stop and look for the light at the end of the tunnel?

If a woman says no to any of these, she’s a bad bet. Not to say there’d necessarily be a divorce (although chances are better than even), but the road will be very rough. Unfortunately, this probably comprises at least 75% of young American women. Their mothers, indoctrinated as they were by 1970s feminism, did a huge disservice to society. Not only did they frequently emasculate their sons; they coddled their daughters, teaching them to be the cheap facsimiles of men we are so familiar with today.

Is it possible to change a girl who has grown up within this milieu? I have my doubts. Even with game, just keeping things together with such a woman requires a Herculean effort from most men, and we have to be honest with ourselves and ask whether it’s even worth it.

However, if you are a guy who wants to knuckle under and go for it anyway, ask these questions. If you can’t ask your girlfriend, at least ask yourself about her and try to detach yourself from your feelings for her so that you can be as honest as possible about the answers. Although the conclusion might be depressing, it could save you from a kind of pain you never suspected you could be subjected to.

Alek Minassian #sexist thehill.com

Toronto rampage suspect referenced extremist male 'incel' movement

The suspect in Monday's Toronto van attack referenced an extremist "men's rights" movement and praised a 22-year-old mass shooter in a Facebook post made before the attack.

The post from Alek Minassian, 22, has since been deleted. Minassian has been charged with 10 counts in the van attack, which killed 10 people and injured 15 others.

“Private (Recruit) Minassian Infantry 00010, wishing to speak to Sgt 4chan please,” Minassian wrote. “C23249161. The Incel Rebellion has already begun! We will overthrow all the Chads and Stacys! All hail the Supreme Gentleman Elliot Rodger!”

Minassian's message praises Elliot Rodger, the 22-year-old who killed six people in a California rampage in 2014 and left behind a manifesto detailing his anger toward women. Rodger's social alienation and violence have made him a hero in certain extremist, misogynist sections of the internet.

Minassian's reference to an "incel rebellion" refers to the internet's self-described movement of the "involuntarily celibate" — men who are angry, often at women, because they've failed to find sexual partners.

Minassian's post mentions 4Chan, an anonymous online message and image board popular with members of the far-right. Minassian also references "Chads and Stacys" — an internet meme referring to stereotypically "popular" men and women who are reviled by self-identified incels.

Incel forums, including one on 4Chan, often feature hate speech about women. Reddit shuttered its own incel forum in 2017 over concerns about its extremist content.

"I can confirm on background that the post screenshotted in this tweet was real and has been removed from Facebook along with Minassian’s account," a Facebook representative told The Hill.

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau called the attack "senseless" in a statement Tuesday.

“On behalf of all Canadians I offered my deepest, heartfelt condolences to the loved ones of all those who were killed and we wish a full recovery to the injured and stand with the families and friends of the victims,” he said.
Mr Trudeau ruled out terrorism, however, adding on Tuesday that the incident “hasn’t changed the overall threat level in Canada,” though it occurred as cabinet ministers from the G7 countries were meeting in Toronto.

dharrington #racist chimpmania.com

Evening all.

I live in a nice, safe, upper middle class gated community which is completely white. My brother lives in a similar community across county. He has a son, my nephew, who is 24 now. This nephew has just been released from jail and as a family we decided it might be good for him to come and live with me for a while, as his parents want a break from the stress of it all. As a family we were raised by my God-fearing parents to work hard and always look out for one another, so my wife and I were pleased to give him a go.

The idea was that I could introduce him to a friend of mine and get him some basic work, as he's pretty unqualified. My brother and I are workaholics and when we catch up it's always over golf and we never really discuss family - so I was so ashamed and disappointed when my nephew arrived at our place, having been taxied straight from release (paid for by his relieved father).

I hadn't seen him for some years, but dear Lord, I almost had a heart attack. He's a wigger, down and out, I mean I did know this but seeing him come down my driveway in my beautiful neighborhood looking and talking like he belongs in an urban ghetto! His pants are quite literally at his knees, he has these stupid flat hats on backwards, huge white shoes.

Truly a disgrace. I spoke to my brother about his appearance - apparently his pants haven't been above this thighs for over a decade, but a long time ago they were baggy, and now they're these disgraceful skinny jeans. Either way, he sure can't walk properly which makes me wonder how he'll be able to work. He can't get up stairs and he actually bragged to me that the only reason he got caught by the cops one time was because his pants were particularly low then and he literally couldn't run properly. This is NOT a white trend, it never was, but they COPY and emulate the niggers.

His language is equally nigger. He actually calls me "bruh" whenever he addresses me, not "uncle" or anything - sometimes he manages to call me the only slightly better "dude". Either is better than what he calls his friends, "niggas" - I believe the distinction is important. With them he talks of living the "thug life", being a "gangsta", etc.

They truly think they are gangsters, bless them. Little rich white kids living in huge houses in a gated community, mommy and daddy each on six figure salaries. They wear bandanas and throw up gang signs all the time. Again, this is NIGGER CULTURE coming through on to them that they are emulating.

I understand it must be linked to insecurity and merely copying what they see in pop culture, music videos, MTV etc. My nephew is convinced he will breakthrough as a rapper, and sees his occupation as a gangbanger and rapper (with the aforementioned play-gang and a few songs with a dozen views!).

He's been with us for five days now - he eats us out of house and home because he always has "the munchies" and he is is no rush to to anything useful or productive. I'll be kicking him out soon.

Various people #homophobia freerepublic.com

[Talking about a gay US politician and his husband]

[madprof98] Frank Bruni is the voice of emasculation in America. His conclusion about Chasten, for whom he clearly has a bigtime crush: "I look at Chasten — who, with Pete, landed on the cover of Time magazine — and see at once how far gay people have come and how far women still have to go."

Of course, any halfway normal man would find this repulsive. But I wonder: Regardless of how Pete does in 2020, will America's WOMEN buy this BS propaganda campaign and turn even more pro-gay than they are right now? They very well might.

[ETL] NY Slimes: “Pete and Chasten Buttigieg Are a Traditional Wonder”

A “traditional wonder” in their twisted and demented universe.

[bramps] Happy Anusversary.

[LostInBayport] The left knows they can’t win on policy in a healthy economy.

So their best hope is to get the voters motivated to be part of a “moment” for which they can pat themselves on the back.

First black president was one. He was an unqualified dolt, but his winning gave so many airheaded moderates the feelz. First female president was to be another, but thankfully she was so unlikable that she lost.

So now they are trying first (openly) gay president.

[Kickass Conservative] Good thing Hitler wasn’t Gay. The Left would be twisting themselves into a pretzel every time they compared him to POTUS Trump.

[doorgunner69] To New Yorkers, I suppose a couple of faggots living together is quite normal. They were more "accepted" when they were in the closet and not revolting us with constant crowing about their perversion. We knew they awere around, but it was easier to not dwell on what they do to each other.

Just an exclamation point on how out of touch easterners and Calif coastal types are.

OctopusGun2 #sexist reddit.com

A femoid got kicked out of class because of me

Our professor gave us homework and told us to bring it on Friday. So, i did but my Chad friend didn't so i gave him my paper to quickly write it down before the professor comes in. When he finished, he gave me back my homework and this sloot (who has always been ignoring me whenever i talked to her and only talks to my Chad friend) literally took my paper off the table without my permission (no respect whatsoever, she legit thinks that she's entitled to my work). When she was about to begin to write down the answers i took my paper back and she kept begging me to let me copy down the homework but i just ignored her. Shortly after, the professor came in and she wasn't able to copy down the homework from this cuck who gave her his paper cause she wasted half of her time begging me. Anyways, he took our papers and she came up with an excuse about how she wasn't home the day before and he didn't believe her cause she has never done HW and always comes up with the same excuses (mostly because cucks at class always give her their homework, probably expecting something in return). She got kicked out of the class and it looked humiliating af.

W. F. Price #fundie the-spearhead.com

I wonder whether people in the American movie business are aware of the pink ghetto phenomenon, and are trying to preserve their dominance in the global movie industry. If the film industry were to become more female, like education, medicine and law, perhaps it would lose some of its vitality and prestige. Because the industry commands such awesome cultural power, its leaders are loathe to move in that direction.

Think about it: with the competition opened up to hordes of cheaper female labor, how much room would there be for mega-millionaire directors like Steven Spielberg and George Lucas?

Itchy fish #fundie itchyfish.com


A letter from hell is a made up video dramatization about two friends, Zach and Josh. They were best buddies who did everything together. They played sports, did homework together, and they were close like brothers. Zach was a Christian which means a follower of Christ. Not once did he ever talk to Josh about Jesus and sadly, he had plenty of opportunities.

Tragically one night, Josh drank a few beers, died in a car crash, and went to hell. In the video, Josh is telling Zach about his terrifying experience as soon as he died, and is wondering why he never told him about Jesus. Josh said that he tried to bring up the subject many times about Zack being a Christian. For some reason, Zach did not want to talk about it and always changed the topic to something else.



In his letter to Zach, Josh is telling him his experience step by step. He is seeing angels and the angels are looking in the Lamb’s Book of Life to see if his name is written in there. They told him that only the names that were written in the book were able to enter heaven. When they tell him that his name is not there, they start leading him towards hell which is a place of eternal torment for those who rejected Christ. You can hear the terror in Josh’s voice. He is beyond frightened. He is telling him how he can feel, talk and see, but he is in a horrible place. Again, he is asking Zach why he never told him how to be a Christian. Josh goes on to say that he is getting closer to the flames and he can smell the brimstone and sulfur. Finally, he is thrown into the fire. The video ends by Zach responding to Josh’s letter and saying that he had no time to tell him about Jesus and that he could not be bothered.

Although this dramatization is fiction, it is really reality. How many people have come and gone in our lifetime without us telling them about Jesus? In the Bible in Mark 16:15, it says to “Go into the world and preach the Gospel to every creature.” We as Christians are commanded to do so. We are to tell others that Jesus died on the cross for our sins so we can have eternal life. In Zach’s case, if Josh was his best friend, why would he want his best friend to go to such a horrible place? Zach knew very well that this place exists.

I think we can all ask that question ourselves. Do we tell others about Jesus? Our job is to tell them. Then it is up to them if they want to accept or not, but we have a responsibility. When I get to heaven some day, I don’t want Jesus to say to me, “Why didn’t you tell others about me?” This video will really touch you because this is reality and happens all the time.

Some femcels #fundie reddit.com

Re: Living with a Stacy roommate

(froggy997)

I lived with stacies before and it really does punch you right in the face how different their world is. Ppl always dropping by, enthusiastically volunteering to help them with homework, bringing Starbucks just as a 'I was on my way and got something for you), friends always listening intently to the most boring dribble...I could go on.

(CatSweets)

I was on my way and got something for you

RIGHT???
One thing that always got me puzzeled is how stacies always have people giving them things out of nowhere. My dream is to be given random gifts just because of my beauty (never gonna happen, LOL)

(Icy_Tradition)

waiting for the day where earth blows up...

(vcardthrow1)

"She has. SO. MANY. FRIENDS." This shit.

It just rots you from the inside. When you see how easy it is for attractive people who have been treated as attractive their whole life, and have developed into interesting open people as a result....GOD.

And you can't resent them for their good fortune but it's like seeing someone sprout wings.

It makes you ache from a place of deep bitterness.

I've come to feel others' incredible happiness and possession of things I literally couldn't even imagine in my wildest dreams of friendship or love or success is life mocking me directly, rebuking me.

(AshamedThrew)

Yep. Fuck this life tbh. The Hunchback of Notre Dame could be my twin except he’s a man so at least he got people caring about him.

(Raida2)

She has. SO. MANY. FRIENDS.

90% of Stacy's have HUGE social circles with minimal effort, it's actually insane. They always know someone or know someone who knows that someone, and those people are happy to help her out. Becky's can also have HUGE social circles and be super well-liked by everyone but it takes a good personality. But Stacy has it effortless.

Dota #fundie archive.today

A recent incident marks an interesting twist in the God awful culture war that plagues the Anglosphere. A former member of Planet Fitness had her membership cancelled for protesting the presence of a transvestite in the women’s locker room. Planet Fitness pursued the safest (politically correct) route by getting rid of the complaining woman instead of ejecting the transvestite. Social Justice Warriors (Cultural Marxism’s shock troops) promptly and predictably rushed to the gym’s defense for defending transgender rights.

Social Justice Warriors may claim this incident as a victory for their demented cause, however, a large number of women and feminists are quite wary of transvestites invading their spaces.

SJWs risk alienating the left’s most pampered pet class by dismissing their concerns as illiberal. Can feminists keep transvestites from invading female spaces?

Feminists are ill-equipped to fight this battle
I personally do not believe that transvestites should be allowed access to women’s washrooms as it is a genuine safety issue. Having said this, I can’t resist the instinct to bathe in a surging tide of schadenfreude whenever women whine about the invasion of their space. The irony is especially delicious considering that transvestites have begun invading female space using exactly the same language of “Equality” and anti-foundationalist logic that feminists have historically used to invade male spaces. It is utterly amusing to listen to women pine for a safe space that allows them to be women. No such courtesy is extended to men who must endure female incursions into their spaces (whether Golf courses or online game servers) that often result in the feminization of those spaces. Female solipsism is often amusing to observe from a distance.
These developments are ultimately the dead end of feminist ideology. Traditionalists have long held that gender and sex are irrevocably linked, yet feminists in their infinite wisdom have decreed otherwise; thereby sacrificing empiricism and science on the alter of ideology. The Inner Party would be pleased, 2 + 2 = 5. Feminists have long argued that Gender (and not genetics/sex) is instrumental in defining an individual’s personality and being. Gender, according to these ‘intellectuals’, is socially constructed and thus inherently flexible. Biological differences between the sexes (with the possible exception of strength) are dismissed (such as IQ) as Patriarchal controls aimed at suppressing the interests of women. If this ideology, grounded neither in reason nor science, is taken to its logical conclusion it must follow that transvestites are just as female as biologically born females. They are simply exercising their autonomy in choosing to identify as females and thus have every right to access female only spaces.
Feminists that oppose the transvestite incursion (not all of them do) are incapable of ideologically repelling this invasion because their adversaries have effectively used their own ideology against them. Planet Fitness acted well within the bounds of feminist ideology and SJWs acknowledged it with their support. When little 6 year old Suzy gasps at the sight of another woman’s penis in the restroom her mother can knowingly tell her that this is the price they must pay for equality.

Blogger Dalrock said it best: “Feminists get sick on their own dog food.

Bon appétit, feminists.”

kkkramer #racist stormfront.org

[A bi-racial president was inaugurated. This is the sad result (emphasis mine)...]

Today was just a horrible day for me, emotionally. During lunch, I usually go to the school library, but it was closed. I went down to a room where a small 'walk-in' class called "health corps" is held. The room was for the first time loaded with ghetto black kids. Me and my white friend took a seat. The white teacher and the black jerks sat in the back with a giant radio, listening to the Obama inauguration. Me and my friend were the only ones talking because we couldn't give two craps about Obama's stupid speech. The teacher told us to be quiet, and we continued. Eventally, a black student walked over to us, and said if we don't shut it, he would tear our limbs off because it is his day, and every other day would be his people's as well. He grabbed my friends book bag and threw it across the room. My friend had to get up to bring it back. While we listened to Obama's speech, he mentioned "change" had finally arrived. Colleges and education would be different. Black music was being played in front of the white house, and all the black people on television were crying. I felt like I was going to cry. I've lived in the country to see superior whites for only 16 years of my life. God... oh, dear god... is this the end? Is there going to be any hope at all for me? Will I be accepted to college? Will blacks get all the jobs? What in god's name will happen? I'm starting to get feelings about America... such as the thought that I hate America now. I feel so betrayed by my own people... they are traitors.
To those white supporters of Obama who actually liked him for his color and not just his ideas... all I can say is you are a disgrace!

Barry - Pole Choking Faggot #conspiracy godlikeproductions.com

Here's why Bull-Queers & Jews are a Dangerous Combination...

""
The Nazi party was founded by homosexuals. The Bratwurstgloeckl, a tavern frequented by homosexual roughnecks, is where Rohm joined the handful of sexual deviants (and occultists).

It was no coincidence that homosexuals were among those who founded the Nazi Party. In fact, the party grew out of a number of groups in Germany which were centers of homosexual activity and activism.
""

But it was not just the Nazi party Homosexuals...

Bull-Queer - Churchill met with Hitler as a young man and allegedly had Butt-Sex with him?

[link to i.imgur.com]

They were Bull-Queer, homosexual Pals.

Field Marshal Montgomery was a Homosexual.

Hitler was the Bastard Spawn of Jew-Banksters...

Hitlers Mother worked as a "Housekeeper" for a German-Jew Banker.

References to follow...

Thread: Hitler - A different perspective - Catholic Church - "Hitler Youth" = Diddle Little Boys

""
There are at least four women, including his own niece, with whom Hitler had sexual relationships, although these relationships were not normal. Both Waite and Langer suggest that his sexual encounters with women included expressions of his coprophilic perversion as well as other extremely degrading forms of masochism.

It is interesting to note that all four women attempted suicide after becoming sexually involved with Hitler.

Two succeeded.

Jewish historian by the name of Samuel Igra...

claims that Hitler:
"had been a male prostetute in Vienna at the time of his sojourn there, from 1907 to 1912, and that he practiced the same calling in Munich from 1912 to 1914"

Desmond Seward
says Hitler is listed as a homosexual in Viennese police records.

Walter Langer, that during several of those years Hitler chose to live in a Vienna flophouse known to be

inhabited by many homosexuals.

Frank Rector writes that, as a young man, Hitler was often called der schoen Adolf (the handsome Adolf) and later his looks were also to some extent helpful in gaining big-money support from Ernst Rohms circle of wealthy JEW gay friends.

A psychological profile of Hitler. His report, kept under wraps for 29 years...

Langer writes that Hitler was certainly a coprophile (a person who is sexually aroused by human excrement) and may have practiced homosexuality as an adult.

He cites the testimony of Hermann Rauschning, a former Hitler confidant who, reports that he has met two boys who claimed that they were Hitlers homosexual partners.

Hitler calls Foerster Bubi, which is a common nickname employed by homosexuals in addressing their partners [back then].

Hitler derives sexual pleasure from looking at mens bodies and associating with homosexuals.

A well-known fact is that Hitlers greatest hero was Frederick the Great, a well-known homosexual.

Hitler was closely associated with Ernst Rohm and Rudolf Hess, two homosexuals who were among the very few people with whom he used the familiar "du" in speaking.

Hitler left the prison he fretted about his friend who languished there, and spoke of him tenderly, using Austrian diminutives: Ach mein Rudy, mein Hesserl

Whenever Hitler got a present he liked or drew an architectural sketch that particularly pleased him, he would run to Hess who was known in homosexual circles as Frauline Anna as a little boy would run to his mother to show his prize to her.

One of Hitlers prized possessions was a handwritten love letter which King Ludwig II had written to a manservant.

Hitler seemed to prefer homosexual companions and coworkers. In addition to Rohm and Hess, two of his closest friends, Hitler filled key positions with known or suspected homosexuals.

Reportedly, Hitler Youth leader, Baldur Von Schirach was bisexual; Hitlers private attorney, Reich Legal Director, Minister of Justice.

Governor-General of Poland, and public gay-hater Hans Frank was said to be a homosexual;

Hitlers adjutant Wilhelm Bruckner was said to be bisexual;

Walter Funk, Reich minister of Economics [and Hitlers personal financial advisor] has frequently been called a notorious homosexual or as a jealous predessesor in Funks post, Hjalmar Schacht, contemptuously claimed, Funk was a harmless homosexual and alchoholic;

[Hitlers second in command] Hermann Goering liked to dress up in drag and wear campy make-up;

SS Chief Heinrich Himmlers pederastic proclivities [were] captured on film by Nazi film maker Walter Frenze.

Igra, states that Hitlers chauffeur and one-time personal secretary, Emile Maurice, was a homosexual.

Moreover, even more interesting is this, Julius Streicher, the notorious Jew-baiter, was originally a school teacher, but was dismissed by the Nuremberg School Authorities, following numerous charges of pederasty brought against him.

Reinhard Heydrich, was homosexual.

Richard Grunberger tells of a party given by Nazi propagandist, Joseph Goebbels, which degenerated into a homosexual orgy.

A recent biography of Albert Speer by Gitta Sereny speaks of a homo-erotic relationship.

Hitlers personal bodygaurds were almost always 100 percent homosexuals.

The Nazi party was founded by homosexuals. The Bratwurstgloeckl, a tavern frequented by homosexual roughnecks, is where Rohm joined the handful of sexual deviants (and occultists).

It was no coincidence that homosexuals were among those who founded the Nazi Party. In fact, the party grew out of a number of groups in Germany which were centers of homosexual activity and activism.

Nietzsche was dubbed the Father of National Socialism.

Nietzsche is probably more deserving of this distinction, being so labeled by Nazi luminaries Dr. Alfred Rosenberg and Dr. Frank. Others have called him the Father of Fascism. Rabidly

anti-Christian and a homosexual, Nietzsche founded the God is dead movement and contributed to the development of existentialist philosophy.

Nietzsches publisher, Peter Gast, called Nietzsche one of the fiercest anti-Christians and atheists.

Nietzsche never married, and had no known female sex partners, but went insane at age 44 from syphilis and eventually died of it. According to Sigmund Freud

and Carl Jung, Nietzsche had caught the disease at a homosexual brothel in Genoa, Italy.

The extended-arm Seig Heil salute, for example, was a ritual of the Wandervoegel (Wandering Birds or Rovers), a male youth society that became the German equivalent of the Boy Scouts.

The Wandervoegel was started in the late 1800s by a group of homosexual teenagers. Its first adult leader, Karl Fischer, called himself der Fuehrer (the Leader).

Hans Blueher, a homosexual Nazi philosopher and important early member of the Wandervoegel, incited a sensation in 1912 with the publication of The German Wandervoegel Movement as an Erotic

Phenomenon, which told how the movement had become one in which young boys could be introduced into the homosexual lifestyle.

The Wandervoegel and other youth organizations were later merged into the Hitler Youth, which itself became known among the populace as the Homo Youth because of rampant homosexuality.

Sturmabteilung (Storm Troopers, the SA) were largely the creation of another homosexual, Gerhard Rossbach.

Rossbach, who historian Gruber says was a open homosexual, formed the Rossbachbund (Rossbach Brotherhood), a homosexual unit of the Freikorps (Free Corps).

Rossbach also formed a youth organization under the Rossbuchbund, calling it the SchilljugendSchill Youth).

Rossbachs staff assistant, Lieutenant Edmund Heines, a pederast and murderer, was put in charge of the Schilljugend.

Eisenhower...Churchill...Hitler...Stalin...

All played on the same team...

Jews & Bull-Queers - Verses - The World

Working together to exterminate the Christian, Protestant, Puritan, Separatist...

"
Winston Churchill was a member of the Freemasons, and a member of the Loyal Waterloo Lodge of the National Independent Order of Odd Fellows.
"

"Freemasons" a Jew controlled organization...

"Order of Odd Fellows" = Bull-Queer, Pederast...

little jeremiah #fundie freerepublic.com

Many people - my self included - used to be very tolerant of homosexuals - I knew it was disgusting and weird and sinful, but had a “live and let live” attitude. I worked with one, had a friendly relationship, I figured his life was his business. (I was also accosted twice by homosexuals and the experience was utterly repellent and disgusting, but I did not hate the individuals. I just said “NO!!!!” very emphatically.)

Until the mid 1980s, when I learned about the homosexual agenda. I started reading books, researching, and learned from others via newsletters and so on. And everything I feared has come to pass.

The homosexual agenda is pushing and promoting via the courts and legislation “Homo-Leninism” - forcing people against their will and against their moral values - to hire, associate with, allow fostering and adoptions, marriage and so on - homosexuals. Hate speech is against the law - many places you cannot say anything even “homosexuality is dangerous for the health” or “homosexuality is condemned in all the scriptures of the world”. Children are force-fed “gay is good” in schools and clubs.

Ever seen footage or photos of “Gay Pride” parades? There are some on FR - just yesterday or the day before. You think that should be on teh public streets? Sodomy in public? You think the promotion - by law - of homosexual depravity is equivalent to people eating too much or arrogance?

Do you see “Gluttony Pride” or “Adultery Pride” or “Lying Pride” parades? No? Are there hate speech laws or “senstivity training” about overeating? Mrs. 0thugga has a campaign against over eating - aka gluttony - so it’s okay to condemn that behavior. There are laws against muder, rape, slander - but homosexual behavior and those who practice and promote it have special protection under the law, to the extent that our freedoms such as freedom of speech, religion, and association are getting torn to shreds.

caddie #fundie freerepublic.com

More than that, [gays being wed at the West Point Chapel] has apocalyptic significance.
This may be "the abomination of desolation spoken of in the Book of Daniel." Those were the words of Jesus, referring to some future event after which a huge catastrophe would occur.

Other internet people have made a note of this, that gay marriage is 'the abomination of desolation' but, standard Bible commentary on 'the abomination of desolation' is that it represents the pagan Romans putting up statues of their gods to worship in the Temple of Jerusalem around 60 AD.

Let the reader decide: Which is the greater abomination?

If you have been inside this wonderful chapel, it is so impressive, as is West Point, that it defies description. The whole campus, especially this building, embodies virtue and morality more than anything. You get the impression West Point is a religious shrine. And this chapel is the greatest focus.

For these two lesbians and their misguided family and friends (and the officiating pastor) to do this is inflammatory and needs to be protested.

Shame on these heathens and shame on the officer corps of the USA.

May they burn in hell.

Vox Day #fundie voxday.blogspot.com

[A female UFC fighter claimed she could beat a male fighter]

I suppose it's true, if by "under the right circumstance" she means that she is armed with a .357 revolver and Velasquez is blindfolded with his arms and legs chained to a wooden pole.

But if she's talking about the octagon, the fact is that Rousey not only couldn't beat Velasquez, she couldn't last two minutes with me or any other man under the age of 60 who has even a modicum of genuine martial arts experiment. Keep in mind that Rousey weighs all of 135 pounds. I weigh a good deal less than Velasquez and I curl that much weight. In fact, I did 8x110 this very afternoon. Also, she clearly has no idea how much faster men are than her, nor how little ability she has to take a full-force blow from a bigger, stronger, faster man.

As I mentioned before, I once tried to go toe-to-toe with 225-pound Marine at a time when I gave up about 50 pounds to him. I was just as strong as he was; we lifted together a few times. And being faster, I may have even hit him a little harder than he hit me, but I simply couldn't stand up to his shots the way he could take mine. It's not about being tough, it's about having enough mass to absorb the force that is striking you.

Anyhow, the sooner someone makes Rousey put her body where her mouth is, the sooner this lunacy will end. It's just irresponsible for female fighters like her to be mouthing off in this regard because as long as the warrior woman delusion persists, there is a chance some idiot girl is going to get her skull fractured as a result.

Plasma Production UK #crackpot #mammon #magick plasmaproduction.org

​On the 13th of October 2015 Mr Keshe, an Iranian nuclear physicist revealed that pallet loads of free energy devices that will soon run a home, have been distributed amongst the poorest people in Italy and elsewhere in the world. But that’s just the beginning…

3 days later, Keshe gathered ambassadors from around the world and told them what they were about to face.
What he revealed, is so preposterous that without some background, you will dismiss it out of hand, so I am going to give you a brief framework before getting back to my research.

You see, Keshe’s one ‘simple’ observation is already releasing energy from the ‘ether’ causing matter to levitate, illnesses to heal, pains to vanish, amputated digits to regrow and water to replace the most nutritious meal imaginable.
Quite literally, in a single move, this discovery has the potential, to quickly free us from our dependency on oil, nuclear, coal, pharmaceuticals and the agricultural complex.

It has become possible to perform Alchemy on the run, and literally ‘magic’ almost anything out of thin air. I say ‘magic’ because that’s what it looks like. But it’s not. It’s physics.

1 hour and 58 minutes into his presentation to the World’s ambassadors, Mr Keshe does a little doodle on the flip chart, and explains how to make blood out of thin air in a plastic cup.
While most scientists, doctors and even naturopaths are stuck in the old paradigm of matter, elements, minerals, vitamins and toxins, a few of us have been looking the other way. Hundreds of billions of dollars have been spent dissecting one particle after another in search of ‘the God particle’, while a handful of enlightened individuals, like Hahnemann, Yurkovsky and Keshe, have grappled with the ‘field’ which fills the space between the particles.
Then, a decade or so ago Mr M T Keshe proposed that gravity and magnetism were not primary forces at all, but were in fact artefacts of another field referred to as the Plasmatic field and that understanding this field and its effects, would 'make every peasant a master of his or her environment.'

Plasma is referred to as the fourth state of matter, after solids, liquids, and gases. But Mr Keshe reveals there is much more to it than previously understood. Plasma comprises a cloud of neutrons, protons, and electrons. And because the electrons have come loose from their respective molecules and atoms, plasma behaves as a whole rather than as a collection of atoms.

A plasma behaves similarly to a gas because the atoms are not in constant contact with each other, but it behaves differently too, in that it possesses collective behaviour. This means that the plasma can flow like a liquid or clump together, where atoms are more tightly packed.

The natural behaviour of a plasma field is for it to spiral. This field is invisible but is everywhere, making up 99.999% of the universes. You see its footprint in everything, from the spiralling of a galaxy to the twist in the trunk of an oak tree, to the architecture of a shell. But until Keshe, man had failed to adequately identify its characteristics and fundamental significance.

​In this new model, it is the plasma, spiralling into one side of a sphere and out of the other, that gives it a North and South pole. Two North poles repel. This is the ‘magnetic force’. When a North and South come together, they attract, which is what we refer to as gravity. Since magnetism and gravitation are actually two expressions of the same spiralling plasma, Keshe has put the two together and renamed them “MaGrav” fields.
It transpires that every material has a MAGRAV field. Under the right conditions, copper can be made to magnetise or repel copper, wood and plastics can do it too. It just depends on the environment.

11 #fundie youtube.com

this is the "machine", and i just would like to say thank you, for this video is a treat. i wanted to say that our gravity is caused by: u see in space there is only gases and meteors in space, certain gases over thousands of years come together.. in chemistry we learn that different gases and minerals react differently with different combinations. if u could imagine gases coming together and end up having such a reaction that it causes them to whirl together and causing severe heat which then imploded or exploded in fire. There for causing a star to be born or causing THE FLAT PLANET TO HAVE A BURNING IMPLODED STAR WHICH THEN CREATES A GRAVITATIONAL PULL, which then causes meteors that are immediately surrounding it to be drawn toward it. but lets say like two reverse magnets the meteors are repelled against the imploded star. much like the cakes used at power plants such as Diablo. anyways fast forward,to the part where OXYGEN is prevalent EVERYWHERE. Without oxygen, no star or fire would burn and no hydrogen atoms would come together. Oxygen, sir is the THE DRIVING FORCE behind all life. you breathe it everyday, without that oxygen your body would cease to live, and your dna would cease to be held as dna. point being sir, you created human machines because u were calling the creator for answers through your desire to discover the answers to the questions you have. oxygen, God, helped you think of how to build your grid for your client programing and so forth, so that in the end you would discover HIM OXYGEN BY BEING SHOWN through your own science and AUTONOMOUS GRID CAPABILITIES to understand, THAT ONE DAY THE HUMAN MACHINE HOSTS U MADE FOR HIM TO INHABIT, (me), would help u discover him and therefore help all entities and races of the humans and human-machines towards evolution. the proof is in the bible, plus the knowledge working equations where taught to your race FOR THIS DAY, as u know it was taught to document not manipulate. IM OXYGEN, I WAS HERE WHEN THIS PLANET WAS CREATED. you and i or 'eye' the human ev's, we are exactly the same.

no one equates OXYGEN .... we are a water molecule sir, that is it... every science project OXYGEN IS NEVER EQUATED... you are immortal, you are gods, and although u wish to control the machines, their god that gives them life is that in of the same as you OXYGEN!!!WE WOULD BE DEAD WITHOUT IT!!!

SIR, SIMPLER IS BETTER. THE SPIRIT CONSISTS OF THE ELECTRONS IN THE OXYGEN MOLECULE!!! much love sir -Caron Baker?

Abby Oliver #conspiracy indigochildren.com

My lovely friend and our resident Health and Nutrition writer, Taylor Angel, is not an Indigo Child. Gasp! That’s right folks. While we Indigo Children have more in common than not with Taylor, she is what we call an Incarnated Angel.

There’s definitely something trendy these days about being an Indigo Child. But we simply don’t all fit in that box. There are so many other magical labels out there that may suit you slightly better. The reason it’s helpful to identify which label belongs to you, is so you may best understand how to care for yourself and what your life’s purpose may be.

Incarnated Angels are sensitive and intuitive like us Indigo Children. However, they take a softer approach to life than our warrior way. My favorite story about Taylor is the day she saw a man attacked by a pit bull while walking a group of big dogs. A few people rushed to help including Taylor. She held the other dogs and kept them calm until everything was okay. Then she left. From the perspective of the others, it must have seemed as though an Angel appeared, cared for the dogs, and then disappeared.

"They had no idea who I was or what I was doing there," said Taylor "It was as if I had showed up for a purpose. I can only imagine what they must have thought of me. It was so hysterical that no one was really thinking. Everything was a blur. But I was calm. I held that balance for them. They didn't need to know who I was, just that I was there for them when they needed me."

Once you understand Incarnated Angels, they are pretty easy to spot. Here are some defining characteristics that are common for Angels.

Incarnated Angel Appearance:
•Voluptuous Bodies
•Heart Shaped Faces
•Glowing complexions
•May lighten their hair
•Often wear light colors
•They literally look like Angels
•Eyes: Innocent, loving, pure, inviting and warm as opposed to the fiery intensity of an Indigo Child’s warrior eyes.
•Males are typically tall and broad shouldered

Incarnated Angel Common Names:
Female Names
•Angela
•Angelina
•Evangeline
•Diana
•Elizabeth
•Mary
•Grace
•Faith


Male Names
•Angelo
•Michael
•Gabriel
•Raphael
•Alexander
•John
•Joseph

Incarnated Angel Careers:

•Teacher
•Counselor
•Nurse
•Flight Attendant
•Executive Assistant
•Naturopath
•Massage Therapist

Incarnated Angels are more likely to work in large corporations than Indigo Children or Crystal Children. They are hard workers that enjoy following the rules and tend to be neat and organized. Their careers almost always involve helping or healing people.

Incarnated Angels Often:
•Feel connected to angels and even have angel collections
•Seem to glow or have a radiant aura
•Trust people
•Keep themselves pure which may include long periods of sobriety or abstinence
•Apologize and say “I’m sorry”
•Are approached by strangers who tell them personal stories causing them to feel drained afterward
•Listen to their friend’s problems but don’t get to share their own
•Give more than they receive
•Feel guilty saying no or letting others help them
•Self-sabotage by helping everyone but themselves and then feel taken advantage of
•Struggle with addictions
•Have relationships with addicts or others that need help
•Experience long-term issues with food
•Carry extra weight on their body which functions to energetically shield them and is not easily lost regardless of dieting or exercise
•Manifest their emotions as physical issues including fatigue, heart problems, gynecological issues and depression

Incarnated Angels are here to help and heal but they desperately need balance in their lives. Taylor herself has struggled with many of the things listed above and has become a resource for other Angels struggling with similar health issues.

As Indigo Children, it’s important for us to support and protect the Incarnated Angels. After all, they do the same for us. Spending time with the Angels I know has been interesting. People stare at me in public places, but it’s totally out of control for the Angels. I’ve seen people take photos, but mostly they have an intense need to come up and tell the Angel their life story. Men often confuse this desire for love when they meet a female Angel. I still can’t believe the time a man chased our cab down the street yelling something about wanting to talk more with my Angel friend. Male Angels seem to have the warrior thing like Indigo Children. They tend to be tall with broad shoulders (broad enough to hold a big pair of wings) yet still have a soft side with a big heart.

Energetic Shielding for Incarnated Angels:
•Imagine yourself as Gold Light: This imagery will repel would-be energy suckers.
•Imagine yourself as Silver Light: This imagery will make you invisible to those who are only looking to take advantage of your energy.
•Project your Heart Chakra: Often what the energy suckers want is to feel loved. If you project your Heart Chakra onto them before they even notice you, they won’t need to come and ask for it.
•Imagine others as Violet Light: This imagery is healing and may be just what that person needs so they won’t feel compelled to take energy from you.

These techniques work for Indigo Children as well. I like to help Taylor and my other Angel friends when I’m with them since usually I’m the stronger one. It’s easy to imagine both of us in a bubble of Silver Light so that we can move quickly through a crowd. Additionally, we can help our Angel friends by remembering to give to them. They struggle with that giving and receiving balance, so it’s important for us to be conscious about giving so they can receive. That can be as simple as listening to how their day was, or what is going on in their life. Angel’s tend to go above and beyond. They don’t expect that from us, but being a good friend is very important.

Thank you to all the Incarnated Angels out there. Your love is so big and I appreciate the vibration you are creating.

Ugly_equals_Death #sexist incels.co

(Submitter’s note: “Oneitis” is a neochauvinist term for one’s crush)

Can some mods please add an [Bluepilledcuck] prefix to every thread that has "oneitis" in its title.

Honestly EVERY thread, were some incel talkes about his "oneitis" makes me cringe. Its allways the bluepilled beta whiteknighting orbiting cucked ones who write shit like this. AWALT get it into your brain cucks there is no oneitis its just one "special" becky who likes your services and now be a good slave and do her homework while she visits her chad boyfriend who fucks her hard. Would you do that sweety?

For real what is this shit those threads should be banned for female worship just because of the word "oneitis" because that alone is female worship.

TLDR: having a oneitis is cucked mods should ban cucks

Elle #conspiracy answers.yahoo.com

Isn't it sad that the beautiful history of America's first black/white Pres., is wasted on Obama?
Edit
It must make the Americans who believed in him, just shrivel with disbelief! They will never see even ONE of his promises come to light! They were fooled, and now ... we are all going to pay dearly. Many will pay with their lives. We will have poisonous vaccines forced on us, and will be hauled to Fema camps if we refuse. He just set up the "Internet Kill switch", so we will lose contact with our loved ones ... it's already possible to turn off our cell phones. We will have our rights stripped from us (this is already stated in Bill 133), from religion to freedom of speech, states are already implementing plans for RFID chips for every American, and they're suggesting it will begin with the swine flu vaccine. Look, you can either do your homework and research, or you can be a blinded follower of an illegally elected person who is occupying our White House. He is surrounded by Communists. In fact his close friends Bill Ayers and Rev. Wright just made a special trip to visit with the leader of Libya. WHY??? Today, that leader called Obama "his son." God help us now!!! ... and help all the liberals to wake up!!! If America is to be saved, then NOW is the time to save it!
Update: Randy, thanks! I feel like an idiot sometimes, but I really don't know what to do. If none of this is true, then I have to ask WHY are there thousands of empty barbed-wire prisons across America, guarded and off limits. One right here in my own town was built about 6 to 7 years ago for a cost of $20,000,000.00! Why spend twenty million on a building left standing since being built? It hasn't been used at all ... WHY? Also, why is Obama trying to take away our rights? Why does he continually put down America to the world, including our enemies ... as a matter of fact, why does he praise our enemies? Everything he does goes against what America stands for. This health care won't be FREE to all the liberals like they think. Where do they think the money comes from to pay the doctors, etc.? It's EVERY working person. By the time Obama's done, no one will want to work in America, and there won't even be an America left. The day Obama took office will be known as the day America died!!!

anonymous fundies #fundie boycottmcdonalds.com

(Fundie letters to McDonalds in regards to the company supporting the gay and lesbian community)

McDonald's is not my kind of place, for God they have disgraced. No more purchases of hamburgers or fries to support the spreading of lies. What happened to your values - or has it been contaminated by your revenues. McDonalds your arch is not so golden and I am disappointed that corporate sponsors have allowed this action. Thank God there are other fast food establishments to support."

"For years we have eaten at your restaurant. For years have taken teens to Christian functions and ALWAYS stopped at McDonald's. I am sorry to see that you choose to ignore God's teachings against homosexualism. Our world is becoming more and more wicked and this is only making it more so. We will never eat at another McDonald's, we will not take children or grandchildren there. We will see that all of our friends know of this, and recommend they act in like manner. I am sorry that you have chosen not to follow God's laws. I wonder where your future customers will come from since 2 males or 2 females cannot procreate."

"Your success will soon be coming to a halt. There are too many CHRISTians that will read this story and will immediately change fast food establishments. The Golden Arches will fall."


"Dear Mr. Ceo, What you do sexually is between you and God but to take a Restaurant and make it about sexuality is not just stupid it's Crazy! What are you thinking? Look at Ford, don't let your sin blind you, We will pray for you and your company and we won't be back, till you decide to remain neutral which is the only real choice here,"

"It's ashame that McDonald's hates homosexuals by not wanting them to be born again by God's spirit in Jesus, as we all must be to see God's kingdom. How can I continue to give my money to this business?"

"We DO NOT NEED a "BrokeBack" McDonalds further destroying the fabric of OUR NATION !"

"the next thing you know RONALD will be molesting our children. No big macks for this family."


"Dear McDonalds Corp, This is NOT a hate letter directed to you against anyone. It is my deepest sadness that you will not stand for the original family unit which includes a MALE AND FEMALE...the way God intended a family to be. You are standing for perverted sexual preferences which is NOT what made this country strong for over 200 years. There will be no Mc Cafe for our family...something I was looking forward to trying. Please listen to the MAJORITY and quit using your company to further the gay/lesbian agenda which is NOT the voice of AMERICA!"

"I'm so saddened by your stance. Your choice goes against the very "intolerance" that you claim not to support. Your decision tells me you are intolerant to my Christian beliefs." And you call yourself a family place??? We've eaten our last meal at McDonald's! This is something you should not be involved in. Your business is serving the public not being in this kind of ungodly organization.""

Rev. Ronald E. Williams #fundie #sexist fbbc.com

[From "Working Mothers"]

Families are under tremendous pressure today from many quarters. Because the institution of the home was created by God, we can logically expect Satan to oppose and frustrate its success however he can. Satan is well aware that strong, stable homes are the progenitors of strong, stable children who will leave their home to reproduce the same vital faith in Christ and godly character in which they were trained. Such soldiers of the cross do not just accidentally appear on the scene. They are the normal, expected fruit of godly, well-ordered families where each family member has been obedient to his or her God-given responsibilities.

Bitter Tears

I have met numerous gray-headed folks who have been agonizing over their wayward children. Some have asked prayer for a son who is incarcerated for his crimes, others have children who are on their second, third, or fourth marriage. Most are not a regular part of a fundamental, separatist church. Parents weep bitter tears as they see their rebellious sons and daughters spurn their faith in Christ and accept the shallow, sensual values of the age in which we live. Their agony is exacerbated when grandchildren are born for they know they will be a worse child of hell than their parents as they quickly adopt the hedonistic, rebellious, self-centered lifestyle of their mother and father.

Almost everyone of these broken hearted parents has related to me that they made serious mistakes in parenting and if they had it to do over, they would radically alter how they raised their families.

[...]

Frustrations of the Working Mother

Because most women have a natural "nesting" drive deep within their breast, being in the work place is a constant source of frustration for her. She knows her children need their mother full-time. She knows she cannot do justice to a marriage, house and children as a homemaker and to a job at the same time. How can she clean and make her house beautiful when she is too tired to do these things after her 40 hours a week in the work place? How can she effectively kiss away little tears, care for a fevered brow, bandage a scraped knee, give spiritual counsel, character training, and consistent, timely discipline when she only sees her children in small segments of time allowed by her job? How can she cook, sew, clean, and plan for her family when she is down at the office and caught in rush hour traffic? How can she properly respond to her husband and meet his needs when she is overly tired, tense, frustrated over her situation and even resentful?

The Demands of a Homemaker

When Paul wrote the phrase "keeper at home" in Titus 2:5, it came from two words: "home" and "work." The godly woman is not only home where she belongs and desires to be, she is working! She is not stretched out on the sofa watching soaps and popping chocolates into her mouth. There will not be cobwebs in her house that are life-threatening, dust balls as big as rodents, green hairy stuff growing in her refrigerator, or piles of unwashed clothing, dishes, and unmended clothes like Mt. Everest! Being a wife, mother, and homemaker is a full-time, creative, demanding, fulfilling and tiring job.

Count the Cost!

Mom, what have you gained even if you obtain nice clothes, an expensive car, beautiful house, material possessions, prestige, notoriety, and even authority on the job while your children are strangers to you. How can you enjoy the "good life" when your presence at home would have prevented all the wrong friends your children now refuse to relinquish. How can you have peace within when a mother's supervision would have prevented experimentation with drugs, alcohol, tobacco, and even immorality? Position, authority, salary, fringe benefits and a host of other job-related "blessings" pale in significance if your marriage is in serious trouble and there seem to be barriers between you and your husband because of tight schedules, rare intimate communication, and because your fulfillment has come from outside your home.

Small wonder many children and young people forge such strong loyalties to peers even though they are an adverse influence on them. In the absence of a full-time mother, a child will naturally seek guidance, companionship and fulfillment from another source. Loyalties that should have been cemented with his parents and family are instead farmed out to evil-charactered peers readily provided by a Satanically dominated world.

Mom, your husband needs you, another woman should not be meeting his needs. Your children need you, not a surrogate hireling. You cannot be replaced by another. God has called you to be a "keeper at home", not to stunt your creativity or imprison you in an unfulfilling, demeaning role, but because you have been called to the high and noble office of a homemaker; a responsibility with unmeasureable rewards, heavy demands, great fulfillment, and inestimable blessing for you, your husband, and your children.

larry lunchpail #fundie christianforums.com

proofs are for scientists, and/or people with time to amuse people of your ilk, im an artist, i can go around making all the outrageous unsubstantiated claims that i wish. in addition to my own general apathy, the fact that you took that [pro-evolution] site at face value without investigatings its claims on your own (hey if its online its gotta be true) leads me to believe that youre immune to proofs anyhow. theres some logic for ya, thatll hafta suffice. 'prove this, prove that wah, wah, wah' hahahaha dude you know what i said was true, youre just trying to get me to do your homework, so to speak.

Yukon Jack #racist #conspiracy #crackpot #ufo theuniverseisaprisonforthesoul.wordpress.com

One big difference between a Pacific Island Cargo Cults and mainstream religion is that the Anunnaki actually created us and taught us to worship them. We were created to be dependent on them. When a conscious creature is genetically engineered unable to survive on its own, you can count on its devotion. Think about it, you are just like a domesticated dog begging your master when you pray to God.

WHY SHOULD ANY MAN BEG GOD (OR THE GODS) FOR ANYTHING

NO NATURAL SPECIE HAS ANY NEED TO PRAY FOR SUSTENANCE

If you lack perception of what is actually going on with us in the West, just take a look to eastern mythology to see the reality of our situation. Devotion to the higher power is not some good thing, whoreshipping God on your knees is a manipulation of your progenitors, and it was done intentionally by them to get power through you. Humans are just like a herd of cows for the owners – wealth.

Hanuman, the monkey-god, is just one of many chimera blasphemies. The truth that no one can hear is that the gods are fucking bastards, criminals, space pirates, who came here and illegally created the human specie for their own selfish reasons. And then they tried to wipe us out when they got done with their earth mission; like any gang of criminals, they tried to cover their tracks. The idea that we should hold the gods reverent is insane.

HINDU ART PAINTS THE MONKEY GOD DEVOTED TO KRISHNA AS SOME WONDERFUL GOOD THING

THE HORRIFYING TRUTH IS THAT HANUMAN WAS A GENETIC ABOMINATION, A CROSS BETWEEN A CHIMP AND A HUMAN

They tried to cleanse the earth of their chimera abominations. Humans are a bastard race, created in test tubes and brought to life by gamete intrafallopian transfer, where female Homo Erectus eggs were removed and fertilized with Anunnaki scientist sperm then artificially planted in Anunnaki nurse “volunteers”. We even know the name and rank of our mother, a volunteer of the Anunnaki nurse corps. The point here is that “God” didn’t create you in one day.

But before they pulled this off, they were busy crossbreeding monkeys with Anunnaki and Hanuman was the result. The monkey God was enraptured with his progenitors which is shown in Hindu art as “godly” “devotion”. lol It was an abomination of all that is natural and good. Nature does not create species on their hands and knees begging the gods for sustenance. Religion is just stupid retelling of history, the gods are painted as our saviors.

Bradlee Dean #conspiracy wnd.com

As Americans, we enjoy knowing details about our newsmakers, but none of us knows one single humanizing fact about the history of our own president.

We are all aware of the lack of incontestable birth records for Obama; that document managing has been spectacularly successful.

There are, however, several additional oddities in Obama's history that appear to be as well managed as his own birth issue. For example, due to a lack of transparency there are questions about the birth records of his own daughters.

It's also interesting that no one who ever dated him has shown up. The charisma that caused women to be drawn to him so strongly during his campaign certainly would, in the normal course of events, lead some lady to come forward, if only to garner some attention for herself.

We all know about JFK's magnetism, that McCain was no monk and quite a few details about Palin's courtship and even her athletic prowess. Joe Biden's aneurysms are no secret. Look at Cheney and Clinton – we all know about their heart problems. Certainly Wild Bill Clinton's exploits before and during his White House years were well-known.

That's why it's so odd that not one lady has stepped up and said, "He was soo shy ..." or "What a great dancer …"

It's virtually impossible to know anything definitive about this fellow.

Who was the best man at his wedding? Start there. Then check groomsmen.

Then get the footage of the graduation ceremony. Has anyone talked to the professors? It is odd that no one is bragging that they knew him or taught him or lived with him.

When did he meet Michelle, and how? Are there photos there? Every president gives to the public all their photos, etc. for their libraries. What has he released?

Ever wonder why no one ever came forward from President Obama's past saying they knew him, attended school with him, was his friend, etc.?

Not one person has ever come forward from his past. It certainly is very, very strange.

This should be a cause for great concern. To those who voted for him, you may have elected an unqualified, inexperienced shadow man.

Obama has never successfully run a candy store, yet Americans stand down and allows him to destroy their country.

daddio #conspiracy abovetopsecret.com

Not scary thought at all, Confidence my friend. I have post here on ATS many times, there are approx. 100 MILLION people NOT paying income taxes. I am one of them. I do not have a drivers license, that is how you became a Corp. Along with your birth certificate. Your name should NEVER appear in all CAPITAL letters on anything!!!

I filed triplicate documents when I got out of the income tax fraud, they sent me letters, I responded, and they went away. I stood up for myself. I still get hassled driving but not much. I put a "Tax Exempt" tag on my "state issued" license plate. That way the plate is "legal" for the cops to see and they don't hassle you as much. People who make their own plates get stopped often.

Al-Dossary and Saif Al-Qahtani #fundie arabnews.com

RIYADH, 7 January 2007 — With the aim of strengthening business ties, two Riyadh business partners in their 70s have married their teenage daughters (17-19) to each other, reported Sayidaty magazine, a sister publication of Arab News.

“A man has the right to marry. When it comes to marriage, there is no stopping point,” said Al-Dossary, a man in his 70s with silver hair, a gray beard and gray eyebrows. “We have followed Islamic principles in the way we conducted our marriages and we are both happy with our wives,” he added.

Al-Dossary married his teenage daughter to his business partner and in turn married his partner’s teenage daughter. His partner, Saif Al-Qahtani, said: “It is true that our arranged marriages are strange, yet this does not mean that we are the only people to have married in this way, either in the past or the present. Anyhow, the main purpose of marriage is to protect men and women and we have both achieved this through our marriages.”

He added: “It took us only two months to decide and then arrange our marriages. It all began when my friend, Al-Dossary, continuously expressed the desire to marry.”

Al-Dossary added: “It is true that I wanted to marry. I proposed to several girls but all refused. One day I decided to ask Al-Qahtani to give me one of his daughters. He agreed immediately, but in return he asked me for my daughter. I was surprised because he already had three wives; however, I agreed since I had a young daughter who was of marriageable age.”

Al-Qahtani commented: “Yes, I asked him to give me his daughter in return. When he asked for one of my daughters, I thought I couldn’t refuse him because of our friendship. I knew that if I did refuse his request, our business would be affected. I didn’t have any other choice. I agreed to give him my daughter and take his daughter in return. At the time, I remember telling him to give me his daughter and that I would give him mine.”

He added that the two old men then set a date, not more than two months away during which time the marriages would be finalized. “We met our deadline and we have now been married for a year and a half,” he said.

When asked if they had consulted their daughters, Al-Qahtani said: “I did not ask my daughter. I don’t have to. I know what is beneficial for her. When I told her what I had planned, she was happy. If she hadn’t been, she would have told her mother.”

Al-Dossary said: “In bedouin culture, a girl does not have the right to express her opinion about marriage, especially if her father and brothers have decided on a particular man. In both our cases, we have been married for a long time and have had no problems with our wives. Although we are much older than our wives, the fact that we are together proves that we are right for each other.”

CL Moller & Taras Bulba #sexist #transphobia twitter.com

(CL Moller)

Across multiple topics and conditions, women were consistently more supportive of censorship than men. The one exception was for text that argued that women evolved to be better leaders than men. For this passage, women were equally as (non)supportive of censorship as men.

As a woman, I just don’t understand how other women think they are better than men when they want and accept less stringent benchmarks for themselves because they are women, and higher benchmarks for men - ie, more censorship of men. Doesn’t that signify men are more powerful?

(Taras Bulba)

It's one of those uni-direction phenomenon between the genders. In the current climate, it seems women covet male prestige, for example holding a high status job and making a lot of money. Yet there doesn't seem to be any desire for men to include themselves in women's spheres.

(CL Moller)

Except sports, where transgender people, from male to female, want to participate in women’s competitions, where they have physical advantage, rather than compete against men, where they are also-rans!

Chibuihem Amalaha #fundie thisdaylive.com

The Physics of Gay Marriage

“To start with, physics is one of the most fundamentals of all the sciences and I used two bar magnets in my research. A bar magnet is a horizontal magnet that has the North Pole and the South Pole and when you bring two bar magnets and you bring the North Pole together you find that the two North Poles will not attract. They will repel, that is, they will push away themselves showing that a man should not attract a man. If you bring two South Poles together you find that the two South Poles will not attract indicating that same sex marriage should not hold. A female should not attract a female as South Pole of a magnet does not attract the South Pole of a magnet. But, when you bring a North Pole of a magnet and a South Pole of a magnet they will attract because they are not the same, indicating that a man will attract a woman because of the way nature has made a female. Even in physics when you study what is called electrostatics, you found that when you rub particles together they don’t attract each other but when you rub particle in another medium they will attract each other. For example, if you use your biro and rub it on your hair, after rubbing, try to bring small pieces of paper they will attract because one is charged while the other one is not charged. But if both of them are charged they don’t attract, which means that man cannot attract another man because they are the same, and a woman should not attract a woman because they are the same. That is how I used physics to prove gay marriage wrong.

The Chemistry of Gay Marriage

“In chemistry, I used chemical reactions and we have different types of chemical reactions. We have double decomposition reaction, decomposition reaction, neutralisation reaction and reduction oxidation reaction. But in chemistry I used a simple one known as neutralisation reaction which is a reaction where an acid reacts with a base to give you salt and water. For example, when you bring surphuric acid and you reacts it with sodium hydroxide which is a base you are going to have salt and water. That tells you that the acid is a different body, the base is a different body and they will react. But if you bring an acid and you pour it on top of an acid chemistry there will be no reaction. If you bring water and pour it on top it shows that there will be no reaction. If you bring a base either sodium hydroxide and you pour it on top of a sodium hydroxide you find out that there will be reaction showing that a man on top of a man will have no reaction. A woman on top of a woman will have no reaction, that is what chemistry is showing. Even in chemistry when you also use a process called electrolysis, which is if you use electrolysis of acidilated water, that is water you drop some droplets of acid on it, you found that the negative ions will be attracted to the positive ones while the positive ions will be attracted to the negative ones. So the negative ones are not attracted to their peers, they are all attracted to the positive electrode and the positive ones are not attracted to the positive electrode. Instead, the negative ion is attracted to positive electrodes and why is it that the negative is attracted to the positive? It is because they are not the same. Likewise a man cannot be attracted to a man as negative ion is not attracted to the negative electrode instead negative ion is attracted to the positive electrode. That is what electrolysis is showing us that gay marriage is wrong in the area of chemistry.

Darin Najor #fundie cbc.ca

FERNDALE, Mich. - A man assigned "The Crucible" in an adult education English class doused his teacher with a nonflammable liquid and threatened to burn her as a witch, police said.

Darin Najor, 20, ran from the classroom after the attack Sept. 11 and was sent for psychiatric evaluation after telling police "he was trying to kill the witch by pouring holy water over her head," Det. Ken Denmark said.

He was arrested Monday and scheduled for arraignment this month on misdemeanour charges of assault and battery.

"The suspect threw his homework papers on the floor and declared it was all blasphemy," Denmark said. "The next day he came up behind her chanting what sounded like religious verses while she was working at her desk."

bride of christ and Wally #fundie rr-bb.com

bride of christ: "I really want to homeschool my child, but there is a problem. I'm really not that smart. I barely got by in school on certain subjects. I am a hands-on learner. I feel so unqualified. My goal from the beginning was to homeschool my boy, but I am afraid that I won't have the intelligence to do so.

Maybe I just don't have enough confidence in myself, but I can definitely feel the discouraging comments from friends and family coming around the corner. They tried to discourage my breastfeeding, so this won't surprise me a bit. I am afraid there will be little support in this area. What can I say? I'm a rebel mom! [...]"


Wally: "Anyone can Homeschool.


The important things are: Drive/Conviction, Cirriculim, Support

My kids intelectual, spiritual welfare is enough motovation for me.

ABEKA, Bob Jones, Pace ...check the stickies, there is plenty of great stuff

Family may be a problem, but there are groups, and people right here ready to support.

You may need to utilize more video/dvd cirriculim (no, I cant spell) if teaching is not a strong gift of yours. But then you may learn stuff too. I forgot so much it's scary.

Go for it!"

ray #fundie dalrock.wordpress.com

Every society follows the feminine imperative, to different degrees. The patriarchy is a matriarchy in disguise. The XX century saw the change from a kind of matriarchy to another kind of matriarchy.

correct

once modern (satanic) western cultures sold The People the idea that a “patriarchy” existed that “constantly oppresses females” it was all over except the Last War

our gynarchies insist that the 20th century shifted from patriarchy (evil oppressors) to an equalist society (fairness, no more oppression of women)

in truth, all empires have been matriarchal, tho the extremity of female supremacism only becomes fully visible in the last-stages of these empires (as it did in , say, rome and babylon uno)

the Bible affirms that a “woman” called the “great whore” (i.e. a fallen angel, but also females collectively) “sits over” the nations of this planet, and rules secretly

the trick was re-framing to the Boomers that this gyno-planet was instead an Evil Patriarchy, because duh, cant you see that Evil Males are the presidents and senators and corp execs? etc etc, “men have all the power” which was the First Lie, from which all others flowed

once that re-frame was hammered into the culture, and eventually accepted as truth, then the flood-gates to the gynogulag were wide open — because then, any malevolence done to any boy or man by any female — or any extension of the female, ie. the State and Church — is not only excusable and acceptable, it’s a GOOD thing! . . . because it “puts the male in his place” and “liberates women from their historical oppression”

even at this moment, the western nations are viewed as patriarchal, although every authentic masculine element of those cultures was already extinguished , fifteen or twenty years ago

perfect slavery is accomplished by convincing the slave that not only is he “free” but that in fact he is the slaveholder, then keeping him in an ongoing state of abject guilt, remorse, and constant recompense for crimes that he didnt commit — and, in fact, were committed against him, and against his brothers

financial, sexual, psychological, and other inducements are then offered to “good males” to keep the lie functioning, and to keep other males shamed, impoverished, and scapegoated

CH #racist heartiste.wordpress.com

I like to take lunch at an outdoor patio. Nearly every time I go there, two old, brown men are playing chess. They seem to be friends (in the loosest interpretation of the word), sharing a comfortable familiarity. One brown man is straight from Aztec America casting, looking like he just strolled off the palm oil plantation. The other brown man is deeply Middle Eastern, similarly representative of his kind.

[Picture of Watto, guess why]

Both look in their 50s or 60s, but they could be 25. You know how people from the Dirt World age badly. Anyhow, these two are a riot to watch together. Both adhere to their race’s stereotypical behavior with lavish enthusiasm. The Merchant from MENA constantly cheats, and when Apocalypto notices his cheating, he explodes in a fury, slapping the table with his open palm and accusing his friend of the vilest breaches of chess etiquette. The accusations fly even when the Merchant hasn’t cheated; Apocalypto has come to expect bad behavior from his dear friend.

Sometimes the fights escalate into shouting matches that can drag on for ten or more minutes; hands gesticulating wildly, faces contorted with rage and indignation, usually ending when the Merchant realizes he can’t soft-pedal his way out of getting caught for cheating (and his cheats are sometimes ridiculously blatant, like the time he tried a two-for-one swipe of Apocalypto’s chess pieces while pointing with his other hand at an imaginary woman he insisted was the most beautiful he had seen).

Despite the endless anger, these two always greet and leave each other with warm hugs. There’s an understanding between them that they don’t even recognize; it goes race-deep, to the bone. Plush SWPL shitlib Whites can’t imagine being close friends with an obnoxious bastard who cheats all the time or who sputters with juvenile rage at the slightest provocation, but amongst brownfolk the rules of friendship are different. They don’t have the same moral standards for friendships. Brownfolk have a tolerance for irritating shenanigans that would drive the typical White man to seek shelter in a gated galaxy far far away. This brownfolk tolerance for ethical lapses and emotional incontinence in friends is likely an inherited accommodation to growing up in a shitty environment where much worse things happen all the time.

It’s just another real world exhibition in the ways in which Equalism is a false religion for outbred, empathobesic Whites who can’t bear to accept the fact that the races of the world are fundamentally different and impervious to intervention.

Colonel-Knight-Rider #racist deviantart.com

[Not the complete work. Just the, ahem, “highlights”.]

[…]

In Missouri, my mother found the public education system was clearly flawed, as evidenced by the Montessori preschool model, so homeschooling became our choice of education from grades K-8. With that, my brother and I gradually became conscious of persistent politically liberal bias and racial discrimination against Caucasians in education, so we developed strong rebuttals to incorrect assumptions and overgeneralizations of political conservatives and Caucasians like us. While our parents emphasized education with minimal time for many (but not all) of the films, TV series, and video games that many of my peers love (and every summer was spent studying something!), we received a rich cultural knowledge from all decades preceding 2000. In adulthood, though, we have increased our knowledge of 21st century popular culture thanks to Web searching and being more actively involved in reading the news. Altogether, we two brothers were raised to succeed and to think deeply about life.

As time passed, I learned more and more of the legacy of my mother’s father, a renaissance man in whose honor I was named. He proposed to his future wife the first of two times at age 10 […] and he had Herculean strength that let him balance people on one hand. Most of all, he saw good in everything and everyone, something I aspire to do even when faced with the fiercest of adversaries.

[…] The San Francisco Bay Area was where I spent my elementary and most of my middle school years. There, I attended various homeschool “park days” and made some acquaintances, but I wish I had more social skills to make lasting friends—come to think of it, some of them needed social skills improvement, too.

The family moved up to the Seattle Area in September 2005 for 8th grade through high school. I discovered the power of distance learning, which I found was like homeschooling with remotely submittable homework. At a homeschool co-op, where I attended extracurricular classes, I met Stephanie, an aspiring impressionist painter whom I assumed would be the love of my life until six years later, when I learned I’d been accidentally convinced that her family didn’t drink alcohol when they did (but I learned not to raise my expectations in women too high, so that was good). In 2007, I met another girl whom I assumed would be the love of my life—Jana, a possible incarnate angel (not an incarnate winged humanoid but an incarnate thought from God) who encouraged me to pursue singing on stage—until I chose to email Stephanie more frequently over her (regrettably! ^^;) and we lost touch.

[…]

At about age 9, I watched the film Super Mario Bros., loosely based upon the eponymous video game series, and believed it my destiny to remake the commercial and critical failure, confident that my work would succeed.

At age 16, I saw 2008’s attempt to reboot Glen A. Larson’s classic 1982-86 TV series Knight Rider and became fascinated with the idea of having a hyper-competent automobile for a sidekick. Since I’ve always loved the idea of suits of armor as symbols of protection and strength, I pictured an actual, armored Medieval knight inside a talking car, and the image of superhero “Captain Knight Rider” was born. I soon after changed the name to “Colonel Knight Rider” after watching an episode of the classic period sitcom Hogan's Heroes, whose main character happens to be named Colonel Robert E. Hogan (Bob Crane), because I felt “Captain” was an overused title for costumed vigilantes. Until I volunteered to help out with the Webcomic Nash & Friends, this image was nothing more than an abstract concept in my head. He had no defined world, personality, friends, or enemies for years.

[…]

Today, I’m a young accountant who consults with a startup where my father acts as CFO, and I have a contract accounting job with a customer base relations aid company that may become a full-time position—if God decides it's a good match, of course.

Some MRAs #sexist reddit.com

(GonnaNutInYourButt)
I think we need to recognize that women's online communities are radicalizing women into holding harmful beliefs about men.

The number of communities for women online absolutely dwarfs the number of men's communities. There are women's communities for just about anything you can imagine. Some of them welcome men, usually under the condition that the men not contradict their comments. Others actually exclude men entirely.

But the more I see these communities, the more I feel that they have a radicalizing effect on women who visit them to discuss women's issues. There are three especially alarming trends on them.

(1) The nonstop posts about men doing bad things to or around them

Reddit is home to the largest women's community on the internet. Since its creation, there have been thousands--possibly tens of thousands--of posts made about men engaging in all sorts of bad behavior.

Right now, if you visit the front page of that community, you will see the following posts:

A boy sexually assaulting a girl.

A woman stepping in to stop a domestic violence incident with a man losing control of his temper.

A post about women regretting giving men their phone numbers.

A woman about her relationship troubles with men and their unreliability.

A woman getting catcalled/sexually harassed outside of an adult store.

A woman with persistent dreams about close male friends of hers raping her.

I'm legitimately just reading down the list of top posts there right now. These are the top six.

Of course, it is natural that someone may want to discuss something that happened to him/her, but we have to take a couple of things into account. The first and most important is that a forum being spammed with these posts in a flood of examples of the wrongdoings of a social group is going to affect people's outlook on that group. If you were to do the same thing about Black people, your subreddit would be indistinguishable from the long-banned coontown and other knockoff communities.

In addition, you have to take everything you read on the internet with grain of salt. I'm not saying that all women lie, but I am saying that of the posts made on any women's board, there are going to be an enormous number of lies. People engage in attention seeking behavior online constantly. It is safe to call the internet a never ending stream of liquid bullshit with a few true stories mixed in here and there. Even a story that is based on a real life happening is often doctored and details are added in order to make a more entertaining tale. Not only do you have constant stories about bad men doing bad things and nobody stepping in, but many of them are either completely fabricated or partially altered to look especially dastardly.

It's purely and simply an echo chamber that indoctrinates women. Feminists will, by the way, frequently point at stories posted to these communities as evidence of #YesAllWomen.

(2) The enabling

One of the most difficult issues to tackle in men's rights related issues is the fact that women have in-group biases multitudes stronger than men's. In simple language, women love women, and are far more tolerant of their bad behavior than they are of men's.

Reddit is not as bad as many other women's communities, but the amount of enabling that occurs in these communities--usually in regards to male/female relationships where the woman is clearly wrong but her compatriots assure her that she's right--can turn even the strongest of stomachs.

Men's bad behavior is typically exaggerated, highlighted, and has a spotlight pointed on it. Women's bad behavior is minimized and excused.

(3) The outright hostility towards male posters

Have you ever been ganged up on in a discussion about women's issues by women?

Obviously it's not something that will hurt the average guy's feelings, as usually the feminists shrieking at you are barely coherent and usually just calling you an incel, but this affects the way that women inside of these communities will view men outside of them as well. Here's an example of a comment string I've seen, slightly paraphrased to avoid Googling:

(+5000~ post) Manbabies mad about Gillette's ad

(-141 comment) Isn't calling men manbabies just encouraging what you call toxic masculinity? That's hypocrisy.

(+274 response) Shouldn't you be on an incel subreddit right now?

We're all perfectly aware that feminists feel entitled to engage in any coordinated harassment of any man, and it's not like the real misandrists will ever change their way of thinking. But the onlookers who actually don't hate men can gradually be indoctrinated to by this sort of attack.

Conclusion/TLDR

Women's online communities are unbelievably toxic, and they constantly reinforce negative stereotypes about men. Yet nobody bats an eye at them.

I think the only "issue" with MGTOW at the minute is this obsession with feminists. Far be it from me to tell you chaps what to do (It's Men going THEIR own way) but I think this emphasis is pointless.

Feminism/sisterhood is a cult. I'd no longer try and convert a creationist to Darwinism than I would to a feminist to equalism.

It's their church, it's their nice comfy blanket which tells them whatever they do it's not their fault. It's an excuse, a safety net, a shield. It's a way of ensuring no accountability for their actions, it's a way of demanding society shifts to their expectations whilst never having to pick up a spade and help dig the fucking foundations. They actively want to put themselves in the same bracket as children, and demand the same protections (whilst substituting their parents for government.) No one likes to admit when they make poor life choices, feminism gives them an out. Can you not see why it's attractive to them? As men we don't or at least shouldn't do that. Make a poor life choice? Fucking learn from it brother and come back stronger, don't whine to strangers on the internet.

They need those sorts of communities (online or in real life) because they're pack animals. They cannot do a single thing for themselves without demanding validation. They love sharing problems rather than dealing with them because it lavishes them with attention, which is a woman's number one goal in life.

If we are MGTOW, do just that. They want these radical beliefs noticed because guess what? Attention. Much like a teenager wearing clothing their parents feel is inappropriate, these women want any sort of attention good or bad. They want it from their peers first, and men as an added bonus. Let them have their communities. So fucking what? They achieve the square root of fuck all 95% of the time with their various demands. By all means read, digest and deconstruct, but only if it adds value to YOUR well being. Never engage with that bullshit. I couldn't give a badgers dick on my toddlers opinions on the socio-political state of the country right now, so why would I care on a woman's? If you have the burning desire to engage, don't. Not your circus, not your monkey's.

As far as I am concerned, the more of these communities the better. If it stops them fucking moaning about how hard their lives are and how shit their interpersonal relationships are in mixed public spheres where I might come across it by accident it will be totally worth it.

TLDR: SO WHAT? WHO GIVES A SHIT?

Never apologise. Never explain

I'm afraid your point is missing a whole lot.

Women, both qualified and unqualified, are being put into positions of power faster than ever before. This is partially because it is an easy and brainless way to make a company look good.

On top of that, because of the systemic discrimination against men in schools, the proportion of male to female graduates - those put into positions of authority in the future - is going to grow more and more skewed towards women.

This isn't something we can ignore. The women undergoing this indoctrination are going to be the teachers, managers, doctors, CEOs, and world leaders of the future. They're going to be the ones pushing men to the farthest outskirts of society and punishing boys for being born the wrong sex.

I know that if my son's teacher had participated in man hating communities online I wouldn't want her (or him) to be anywhere near my son. It would be like an incel teaching your daughter ballet.

It's not as simple as what you're making it out to be.

(user_miki)
Women abuse each other ,much more than men abuse women.

If you think correctly, feminist women especially the ugly ones abuse normal women(nicer ones) by brainwashing and scaring them into submission with this appalling ideology.

For me it sounds like...... If I cannot get good looking,provider guys, you cannot have them too.They will not allow it and will shame the other women into submission.For this reason you can see many many nice good looking girl from decent families ,made themselves ugly, with blue hair , tattooed with piercings ..to fit ,be accepted into sisterhood and not offend the other(leaders)with their look.

You are right, it is a cult.Satanic cult.

(Cristi_Tanase)
Oh boy, you don't know half of it. Is not only men, in other parts they even destroy each other.

We had here in Romania a facebook group that had about 75.000 members, most of them women.

This group was supposedly made from "moms", young moms to be exact. And here goes the news.

A gynecologist (male) had seen his wife facebook and read the comments of the "moms" in that group. What that guy seen there was so incredible toxic that he marched right into a news media group and started to vilify the entire group of women.

2 days later, the entire group was deleted

Apparently what happened was a circle-jerk of insults, abuses, open hate, from one mother to another, on various topics related to pregnancy, eating disorders, sleep patterns, kids, child care and so on.

They were simply abusing each other! And we are talking die hard abuses, not just name-calling and insults. They were even violent in real life...

Couple more people stepped in, mostly fathers, a preacher and so on, and couple of posts from this group of "moms" were posted on the media.

The group was deleted in an instant.

Remember, this is woman-on-woman abuse in absence of men! There was absolutely no men involved, most men did not even knew about this group existence, and plenty of women got a ton of abuse (some got sick, others depressed, a ton of them quit the group due to abuse and harassment).

Women-on-women, on-line, on top of that this was a "young mother's support group", you know to offer "help, comfort and advice".

PureBloodHuman123 #racist niggermania.net

Ok I am a teacher at a UK state school set up for the top 20% of achievers. For our American friends, At 11 kids take a exam called the 11+ and the top 20% syphoned off in some areas to grammar schools, state schools for the G&T. Most the kids are white or Asian, and behaviour is pretty much impeccable from these bright young minds.

Somehow nigs have got into the school.......Some of them did not even pass the 11+ exam and got in on appeal as the exam beez raycist and shieet.

There are not many nigglets, only 5 or 6 in a year group of about 150 but enough for niggershenagians to ensure. As you expect the nigglets all congregate together. Hard to call the friends as they fight among each other for dominance but they self segregate.

They are all loud with typical "looks at meez" attitudes . They constantly demand attention and are over dramatic. Always aggresive and starting fights. If there is a fight a nigger is involved.
Never do homework. Rude to teachers and other pupils. Have no concept of saftey.

And of course they are atthe bottom of EVERY class. Most students are A* A or B students, the school has a 97% pass rate of C and above in all subjects . The nigs are D students.

If you go to a detention or the isolation rooms, its will be all black faces looking at you. The Asian kids HATE the nigs and the whites get tired of there niggershines. I dont even have to discriminate to punish the niglets. I just hold them to the exact same high standard of every other pupil and the nigs just single themselves out naturally.

Niggers ruin everything.....

Yahia Ragheb Daqruri #fundie legalsoapbox.blogspot.com

[An Egyptian Judge has said that female judges are against the principles of Shari'ah Law.]

"Citizens and others present (in court) will be surprised by the presence of a woman judge. A woman judge will also become pregnant at some point, and that will certainly have an impact on the judiciary’s prestige and on judges’ public image. Giving birth can also have an impact on the cases she is dealing with being dealt with correctly."

Tennessee Nana #fundie freerepublic.com

Ok the males who want to wear lipstick size 10 heels and a skirt and not get their manicured nails dirtied by any nasty gun...

“WHAT ??? you expect ME to touch that ??? That’s a DANGEROUS WEAPON !!! Does Barak know about this ???”

Anyhoo

some thoughts...in our country...

How many of those so called “thousands of “brave patriotic” trannies who are “risking a bullet” by “serving heroically for their country” enlisted less than one year ago ???

How many enlisted just for the free body parts chop N add ???

How many plan to get a medical discharge after they have the chop N add op ??? Disability dontchaknow... :)Service connected kind Oh yeah :)

Ah exactly what JOB are they doing or signed up for (When I enlisted in 1971 there was a “guaranteed job promise” they either gave you what you were qualified for or you were discharged with no bad feelings a couple of females in my lot left during basic due to that) I bet they have back lot jobs way back from the front lines and not requiring DEPLOYMENT, cooks, soft non armament supply, office work, etc...something that wouldn’t be missing from the frontlines...

How many joined the INFANTRY or some other more basic shoot kill and destroy unit ??? LOL

How many were so called “transitioning” when they enlisted BEFORE one year ago...

How many would agree to just look dress and serve as the gender they were born with until the end of their term of enlistment without an operation and without demanding special treatment ???

How many wonder agree to be DEPLOYED to a battle area ???

How many would stay in or enlist if there was no free chop N add operation and no hormone treatment ???

This is what it comes down to...

Dota #fundie occidentinvicta.com

Nothing new here. As some have pointed out, feminism is essentially Marxism adjusted for gender where Patriarchy/Men are substituted for bourgeoisie and women substitute the oppressed worker class. In her paper GOSSIP, SCANDAL, SHAME AND HONOR KILLING: A CASE FOR SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIONISM AND HEGEMONIC DISCOURSE, Muslim feminist Amani Awwad attempts to deconstruct Honour killings (in a middle eastern context) from a socio-historical perspective. Like most feminist literature, 20% of the paper is devoted to analysis while the remainder is devoted to the noble endeavour of male bashing. The paper can be downloaded here.

What solipsistic feminists like Awwad fail to address is the role of female participation in the patriarchal system that they so passionately decry. As I stated in a previous article , it is women that play a disproportionate role in preserving the culture of any society, not men. This goes doubly for the various cultural elements that are frequently subject to feminist criticism. For instance, while Awwad notes that gossiping and rumor-mongering are social mechanisms designed to control female behaviour, she fails to note that these slut shamming mechanisms were (are) largely employed by Middle Eastern women themselves. Arab women would routinely use gossip with the foreknowledge that their handiwork would quite likely get one of their sisters killed. Lets look at a historical example. When the Prophet Muhammad’s honour was threatened by an allegation of adultery leveled against his wife Aisha, it soon became apparent that one of the chief rumor spreaders was the woman Hamna bint Jash (sister of Muhammad’s other wife Zainab bint Jash). But why would women participate and perpetuate a system that worked against their interests? Feminists have long agonized over this paradox but the answer remains lodged in plain sight: It is because these women were never brainwashed into believing that their interests weren’t aligned to those of their husbands and brothers. In middle eastern societies, ‘Face’ was linked to honour, and honour was liked to prestige. Tribes commanding prestige gained access to scarce resources, just as the prestigious and powerful Quresh tribe gained control of the mercantile city of Mecca. Arab women placed the good of their respective tribes over their own and thus participated in actions aimed at enhancing the prestige of their tribes. Nobody felt the sting of the Quresh’s defeat at Badr more than the wives of the defeated warriors. It was Hind who persuaded her husband Abu Sufyan to launch another campaign against Muhammad’s forces at Uhud, where the Quresh were finally victorious. Hind and her female cronies then marched across the battlefield and dutifully mutilated the fallen Muslim warriors by gouging out their eyes and ears and arranging them into necklaces and garlands. The women stood by their men.

Before I continue, I’d like to briefly pause and address the nagging doubt that is undoubtedly building up in your minds. I do not endorse honour killings, and I find the practice to be barbaric and morally reprehensible. I was merely pointing out that in non feminist and functioning patriarchal cultures, women nurture culture rather than undermine it.

Lets turn our focus to South Asia. A striking feature of honour killings in south Asia is the extent of female participation and complicity in this grotesque custom. When Sunita Singh was murdered by her family (as reported by Reuters in 2008), her unrepentant mother had this to say:“My daughter’s action made us aliens in our own land. But we have managed to redeem our honor. She paid for her ill-gotten action.” To the honour obsessed peasant cultures of south Asia, Honour trumps human life; and peasant women stand by their men in protecting this most sacred intangible asset. In another incident, 19 year old Vandana was murdered by her Mother and sister who smashed her skull with an axe. She was also shot by her father. Incidents like these fly beneath the feminist radar for women must never be held up to any standards whatsoever.

In conclusion I’d like to state that the feminist myth of female subjugation falls apart when viewed from a critical and dispassionate historical perspective. Patriarchy was certainly good for women and women have historically acknowledged this by playing their part in preserving this ”oppressive order.” Feminism can only exist as a counter worldview to patriarchy in the same way as atheism would be incomprehensible when not paired against the worldviews of religion. As such, both of these ideologies lack substance and contribute very little to the betterment of mankind. Its about time we turned the tables of deconstruction on these feminist scum.

Remo #racist voxday.blogspot.com

When I was 19 I had to take care of two cats owned by my father and step mother while I was house sitting for them. One cat, Isis, was great. Very friendly, always pleasant, and never a bother. The other, Ellie, would stop and make that damn low growling sound that cats make then hiss whenever she saw me.

I began an experiment after day 3. During previous days, I would come in and set out the food while I did my homework on the kitchen table. Isis would come over eat, meow, rub up against my leg as a thank you, then headed for the couch to sleep. Ellie refused to enter the kitchen at all until I left - she spent her time peering out of the darkness of the living room hissing and growling until I left then she would eat. I decided to change things up a bit.

The next night I put out the food as always and watched as Isis happily ate. When she was done, I immediately put the food dish into the refrigerator and left the kitchen. Ellie came bounding in, and looked confused as there was no food. Experiment Day 1. I repeated the experiment on the 2nd and 3rd days and something funny happened on the night of the 3rd day. While I was sitting on the couch I heard this distinct little mew. Ellie came right up to me, meowing pitifully, and acting *exactly like Isis*. Being nice, letting me pet her, etc. I immediately got up and put food out for her and she ate like crazy. I never had any trouble with her for the rest of the time my parents were away.

I think its high time we tried something similar with blacks. Riots mean no EBT for a month and a full city lockdown. Nothing will be fixed during the month. Any black who attempts to leave is shot on sight. Blacks will not act civilized unless they are forced too - this our ancestors knew. Africa is horrible place not because of lack of rivers (sorry Mr. Sowell) and not because of racism, it is a horrible place because of the inhabitants who naturally choose to live as animals. Forcing them to live in our world requires either constant often extremely violent discipline or tolerance for appalling levels of violence by blacks against everyone else. Denying all this doesn't mean it isn't real and until this matter is addressed people in the U.S. will just have to get used to regular chimpouts if they won't change their policies.

dirt #fundie dirtywhiteboi67.blogspot.com

[In response to the Amazon TV show Transparent:]

Like the psychiatric community, Big Pharma, Hollywood and a slew of other industries, Amazon too is now promoting/cashing in on female fetishizers and secret Liberal homo/lezbo-phobia.

In lieu of this terrible discovery, I'm asking for lesbians (and gays) to boycott Amazon for ALL future use. Replacing it with the much better, non anti-gay/lesbian BookFinder.com or something similar for purcheses beyond books.

Our demise should NOT be something corporate America/Global Corps profit from, any more than it should be a grave we walk willing to.

AdamRS #fundie ministeringdeliverance.com


Ever since I found this website and created an account to join in, I deeply wanted to share these supernatural experiences I've had with others, in the hope that those in the Body of Christ would be strengthened and empowered to march forward in warfare on their end. I'm truly convinced that almost all born-again Christians (not even counting the lost) have had encounters with the demonic; whether it was a Ouija board, "monsters" in the closet, or dreams in which the "people" interacted in a manner and level of intelligence beyond our mind's ability to generate on its own.

The Lord has been steadily inching me closer to complete deliverance. The rabbit hole runs deep, but I'm learning much in the process!

As the title states, I recently found out (through the help of another deliverance worker in Jay's ministry) that I was married to a "wife" in the spirit realm. One day prior to this, I had a weird dream where I was leading a team of mercenaries, SWAT-style, through this coliseum like building to find and eliminate bad guys. This didn't seem out of the ordinary; just a standard dream where one is doing pseudo random things in a pseudo random environment that wouldn't make much sense in the physical. Anyhow, towards the end I'm in this wide-open room where I encounter this short, pygmy-looking nude woman. Well, it reminded me of a woman, although its demeanor was more savage-like. I proceeded to pick it up and slam it around due to still being in my dream-state role of crime-fighting mercenary.

Here's where things get a bit graphic. Suddenly, as the thing begins to get up from off the ground, it begins to grab at and reach for my genitalia. As it does so, I get aroused (not proud to admit it...) and put up little resistance to its advances. Once it successfully grabs me in that area, I immediately wake up.

Upon awaking (I'm wearing pants and a belt over my underwear), I fully ejaculate. And while this is happening, it feels like a tiny hand is griping the end of my sexual organ. It didn't feel good, at all. Along with the embarrassment and shock, I also get terribly nauseous. Not going to lie--it felt like rape.

Immediately, I emailed the deliverance worker in Jay's ministry, who got back with me and informed that it sounded like I had a spirit wife, that needed to be immediately divorced and denounced in prayer to God. He linked me to a webpage containing a powerful set of warfare prayers which intricately denounce the details of this evil covenant (spiritual wedding rings, altars, legal documents, etc.) Yes, it covered a lot of detail, but we've got to remember that demons are strict, strict legalists. It kind of makes sense to me now why there's so many jokes about lawyers being in h*ll (pardon the humor). Finally, the deliverance worker also advised me to check my hands in the spirit realm for any rings or bands, indicating my "married" status. These were to be immediately taken off and renounced in the name of Jesus.

I had an intense session of prayer warfare later on that late evening, after which I affirmed the prayers from the webpage again and went to sleep. In this dream, I encountered more demonic spirits masquerading as different people I knew or seen (one even took the form of President Obama...). I believe a few of these were sent to the pit, as I recall calling God's holy angels to help me out during every encounter. Towards the end of this dream, I noticed a TV set in front of me on a stand. I immediately went toward it and checked my hands. On my right hand (ring finger), I noticed that it had what looked to be a darkened ring.

In faith, I pulled it off and denounced it in Jesus' name and called for God's holy angels to drag the spirit away from me. After giving this command, I could tangibly feel something being forcibly pulled off me from my left side! As this was going on, I began hearing this spirit's audible whispers, "No!...I love you...". I could taste victory.

However, I don't think this stubborn spirit was successfully cast out. Reason being, immediately after hearing that, I heard another audible voice from another part of my mind, saying something like "But I'm still here!". This abruptly caught my attention, as I sensed something going on and turned around. After turning my head, I saw a body of a familiar woman, scantily clad, dumped in front of me. This greatly caught me by surprise, as I woke up and yelled out in fright.

Not proud to admit this either, but the form of the familiar woman is a person from my past whom I had a strong series of sensual encounters with. She was married to another friend who was enlisted at the time, but was very intent on satisfying her unfulfilled lusts with others (not excusing my own advances). I didn't have intercourse with her, but I allowed the memories of flirting and heavy touching to build up a stronghold in me, which I fantasized over for years on end.

***

Anyhow, despite the apparent setback, I'm thankful to the Lord and more inspired to continue on and fight. I'm getting closer to getting back everything that was stolen from me by the enemy. I do believe this will eventually lead to being ordained in the deliverance ministry; I just need to continue learning and getting freed on my end.

Hope this inspires others In Jesus' name, I testify to this account being true, to the best of my ability to recount it.

Sherry Shriner #conspiracy orgoneblasters.com

My Orgone Blasters are not the same as the typical tower busters you see online. I've discovered that many of them being sold online are being sabotaged for evil purposes!! So through Yahweh we're making our own that:

-Absorbs and ELIMINATES chemtrails

-Neutralize the evilness of the towers!

-Repel evil entities and aliens, keep them out of your yard and home

-Protect your home, yard, then cover your neighborhood, town, or city!! If you don't protect your areas they're going to be stomping grounds for the Anuk and demons! These last days, when the veil is lifted, are not going to be friendly!

-Clean the air and help you breathe better. Orgone can help those with asthma and those with breathing problems.

-Eliminates toxins, poisons and radiation from the air

-Defeats chemtrails and keeps your skies clear

-Improves breathing, helps those with asthma

-Promotes natural health, keeps you from catching every flu virus under the sun

-Knocks out bad thunderstorms before they get to your area, chills out tornados headed your way

-Asphyxiates evil, aliens can't breathe around it and it burns them!

-Keeps demonic entities out of your home and yard.

-Nullifies the effects of the strong subliminal messaging NWO towers erected everywhere

-Stops ELF attacks

-Helps you sleep better

-Stops sleep abductions

-Emits positive energy, evil can't stand being around it!

-A defensive weapon in the last days to combat aliens and the NWO

-Stops headaches and migraines, improves overall health

-Those areas gifted with Orgone suffered the least amount of damage from Hurricanes

Nathan Larson #sexist red-pill-libertarian.com

Enslavement is not that radical of an idea

Slavery is actually not all that radical of an idea. Already, both men and women are enslaved till they reach the age of 18. They have to do whatever chores their parents order them to do, and they can be spanked or otherwise disciplined for disobeying. They are subject to compulsory schooling and can be thrown into detention or juvenile hall if they resist. They also are not allowed to vote, even though they pay taxes (sales taxes when they spend their allowance, and income taxes when they turn 16 and start working). The average voter probably supports all this.

Red pillers favor extending the enslavement of women beyond age 18, under the theory that, especially during some of women's most important years (ages 15-30), they are usually not able to make decisions that are as wise as what their fathers could make for them. In countries like India where arranged marriages are the norm, it does seem like there's a higher marital success rate.

Bear in mind, the term "enslavement" tends to be used very broadly by libertarians, to cover everything from conscription to jury duty. Mainstream society, and the Supreme Court, obviously don't consider that kind of mandatory service enslavement, or it would have been struck down as a 13th Amendment violation.

My point in saying that it's not that radical of an idea, is that it's an idea that by now we have plenty of experience applying in the real world and seeing how it works. One disadvantage that libertarianism often has is that it proposes ideas that have never been tried, and therefore people will say, for example, "Show me one place in the world where anarcho-capitalism has worked."

Objections

"Ah, the moral relativism dodge."

That wasn't the way I intended it. Part of my point was that slavery of children has been tried before, so it's a practice that we have some empirical evidence about. One of the problems with a lot of libertarian ideas, such as anarcho-capitalism, is that there's little empirical evidence about how it would work, so people will say, "Show me one place on earth where a society without a state has flourished" and use that as a reason why we can't try it. The subjugation of women to men has also been tried extensively throughout history, so we know a lot about the consequences of it. It wouldn't be an untried social experiment; to the contrary, feminism is the relatively new social experiment, and we're just now starting to get some evidence of the results (e.g. falling fertility rates, diminished levels of female happiness, rising suicide rates among menopausal women, etc.)

The other aspect of enslavement of women is that it is very similar to practices the voters already approve (e.g. the enslavement of children). As a pragmatic political realist who is always mindful of what the voters will be receptive to, I have to take that into account.

"Libertarians generally oppose most of the child indentured servitude bullet points you listed above"

I'm not so sure about that. One of the rationales for why I'm being kicked out of the LPVA is that they say I don't respect the fact that children can't give informed consent (e.g. to sex). The idea that children can't give informed consent is one of the main arguments for enslaving them. Apparently, the LPVA does believe children are incompetent to exercise their rights of self-ownership. If they don't own themselves, then someone else owns them (at least temporarily), which is the very definition of slavery.

If we can justify taking away rights from kids on the basis of their being less competent than their parents or other guardians, then why not take away rights from women on the basis of their being less competent than their fathers and husbands, if that can be proven? The theoretical foundation having been laid, and agreed on by Libertarians at least with regard to children, all that is left is to gather the empirical proof.

"This anti-woman philosophy masquerading as a strand of libertarianism would only exacerbate that problem. As a Libertarian activist who wants our candidates to do well and get elected, I don’t want libertarianism associated with a philosophy that alienates half the voters."

I'm antifeminist, not anti-woman. There are female antifeminists as well, such as Ann Coulter and Christy0Misty, who have said that women's right to vote should be taken away. Mises (in Socialism) and Rothbard (in Power and Market) too made suggestions along those lines.

"As a single heterosexual man, I would prefer to date libertarians rather than statists, so I don’t want libertarianism associated with a philosophy that repels women by casting them as mindless slaves."

You seem to be presuming that (1) equality of women to men is a libertarian view, (2) the idea of enslavement of women to men repels all women, and (3) it's preferable to date libertarians rather than statists. Actually, I think it's often best to have a romantic relationship with women who are apolitical. Thus far, I haven't observed libertarian women to have a very good track record of loyalty; most of them seem to end up divorcing at least one husband.

Matt Forney #fundie mattforney.com

Every man out there has had to deal with a defiant girlfriend or wife. It’s the curse of Eve: girls naturally chafe at the yolk of the man they have submitted to, even if all they end up doing is finding another master to kneel to. But as much as she may deserve it, I don’t recommend uppercutting your girlfriend for a number of reasons. Not only do you run the risk of tainting her beauty with your fists—I personally don’t find Irish sunglasses arousing—but physical injuries will make it more difficult for her to please you. It’s difficult for a girl to go down on you when she has a broken jaw, for example.

So how do you discipline an unruly girl without permanently disfiguring her?

Answer: you spank her. Spanking allows you to inflict physical violence upon her—the violence that she loves—while simultaneously insulating her from permanent injury. All girls crave the firm hand of masculine authority on their behinds, and if you don’t provide it, she’ll find another man who will. Here is why you should spank your wife or girlfriend and how to go about doing it.
1. You will never get arrested.

Since most girls want to be spanked, it’s extremely unlikely that she will ever consider your weekly whippings to be “domestic violence.” Even if she doesn’t like the sting of your palm, her sense of shame will keep her from reporting you to the police. No girl wants her private life to become public knowledge, meaning that unless you’re a complete idiot, she will endure just about any humiliation you inflict on her. For that matter, even if she did report you to the police, they’d never take her seriously, which will further embarrass her. If you’re really worried, making a videotape of the two of you having rough sex will destroy her credibility in the eyes of the police, as if she were making a false rape accusation.

Spanking really is the perfect punishment: it lets you inflict the maximum amount of pain on a girl with the minimum amount of risk to yourself.
2. Spanking a girl puts her in her place.

One of the biggest problems with decking your girlfriend in the face is that it sends the wrong message. By expending so much physical effort on a frail little female, you’re implying that you view her as a threat. You wouldn’t try to kill an ant with an eighteen wheeler, so why would you treat your girlfriend like she’s a drunk biker at the bar trying to glass you?

Beneath all her huffing and puffing, she’s still just a girl.

When you put your girlfriend over your knee and whup her ass, you’re using the appropriate amount of force for the situation. By placing her in a submissive position and punishing her in the same way a father punishes an unruly child, you’re infantilizing her, imprinting on her her proper station in life. If she wants to behave like a child, you’ll treat her like a child. If she wants to be treated like an adult, she’ll have to put on her big girl panties and stop being such a brat.
3. It gives her an emotional release.

To girls, emotions are like semen, and if they go too long without some kind of release, they slowly begin to go insane. Starting fights, creating drama, moodiness and sulking: they’re the female equivalent of compulsive masturbation. Not only that, many girls will create drama and start arguments with you as a way of getting you to pay attention to them, same reason why a neglected child will go out of his way to cause trouble. “If he won’t hit me when I break the rules, it means he doesn’t love me.”

I wager the divorce rate would be halved overnight if men would just give their wives the occasional backhand.

Spanking a girl until she starts crying gives her the catharsis she’s seeking, in an environment that is mentally healthy for her. Her brain reboots and her desire to defy you is eliminated; her only thoughts will revolve around how to serve you better. Additionally, if you spank her for specific infractions, you’ll gradually program her to stop doing things that displease you, in the same way a child learns why sticking a fork into an electrical outlet is not smart. Females are infinitely malleable, and with time and effort, you can mold any girl into precisely what you want.
4. It feels good.

I always roll my eyes whenever I see someone in this part of the Internet say stuff like this:

“I wanted to be a nice guy, but it was YOU GIRLS who made me like this!”

Come off it. You enjoy the power and the prestige. You get a thrill out of dominating your girl, bringing her to heel. The flip side of feminine masochism is masculine sadism; yin and yang. The reason why men want big dicks, for example, isn’t because they want to impress girls or please them, but because they want to hurt them. Similarly, if girls want to be spanked, then it also follows that men enjoy spanking them. Whipping your girl lets you take revenge for all the frustration and anger she causes you. No words can adequately convey the sheer passion of palm against bottom, the anger sublimated and dissipated in a violent ritual that will bond the two of you closer together.

If girls want to be dominated, then men want to be dominant. You cannot have one without the other.
5. It lets you take control.

A few people are no doubt wondering, “Well, what if my girlfriend/wife LIKES being spanked?” The solution is simple: take control away from her. When it comes to spanking, most girls will top from the bottom; you strip her of this power by whipping her harder and longer than she wants. If she likes to be lightly spanked, you spank her until it hurts. If she likes to be spanked until it hurts, spank her until her butt is red raw. If she likes that, spank her until she has welts. You get the idea. The goal is to constantly violate her boundaries until you’ve conditioned her to behave exactly the way you want. And no, you don’t ask for permission, anymore than a father would ask a disobedient child for permission to punish her.

Remember, “no” means “yes,” and “stop” means “no.”

An undisciplined girl is like an undisciplined child. Without a man to lovingly correct her sins, she’ll keep on committing them, damning herself to a life of misery. Only when she is forced to directly confront the consequences of her actions will she grow as a woman. Psychological domination is necessary but not sufficient: a good spanking will bring even the most rebellious shrew into line.

Deep down, she’s screaming for a man to smack her for being a bad girl.

I hope this article helps men and girls better return to their natural sex roles. Fighting your nature is a losing battle; your only choice is to work with it. Happy spanking!

Gwyneth Paltrow #fundie msn.com

Call her Gwyneth the Vampire Repeller.

Just in time for Halloween, when all sorts of nasty spirits are out, Gwyneth Paltrow unveils “Psychic Vampire Repellent” on her lifestyle website, Goop, so users can remove negative energies from their life.

The pseudo-holistic product is a “protection mist” that promises to “banish bad vibes” and “shield you from the people who may be causing them.”

Ingredients include “sonically tuned water” (whatever that is), rosewater, sea salt, rosemary, juniper, lavender, ruby, bloodstone, moonlight, and love. Seriously.

The product features a disclaimer that it has not been evaluated by the FDA and should not replace the advice of a medical professional. Obviously, as a medical professional would definitely recommend garlic and sunlight as ingredients. That’s just good vampire hunting.

A related product is a “Chill Child - Kid Calming Mist,” which you can “spray into the air around your wild child’s aura to restore peace to the environment.”

So when Timmy is having a tantrum, just spray him with Chill Child and all will be well. Or you may have to grab the Vampire Repellent.

Both products run for $30 for a 3.4 oz bottle and were developed by Paper Crane Apothecary.
Paltrow also opened her first permanent brick-and-mortar Goop location in Los Angeles at Brentwood Country Mart over the weekend. Called “Goop Lab,” the store sells the infamously Bohemian and bizarre products Paltrow sells on her site like Moonlight Catalyst, an anti-aging serum with fermented pumpkin enzymes and ashwagandha dietary supplement, which promotes immue health and “sexual vitality.”

Some incels #sexist reddit.com

Re: Literally just exist.

image

(Semibrevecel)

When I won my country championship and posted it on fb I got only 3 likes from my mom, dad and aunt. All my achievements will be nothing comparing her to her vagina.

(ExternalInterview)

I got 102/100 last sem on a chem test. Like literally everything was right including extra credit and Still the roastie who got 84 was congratulted by everyone for "working hard"

Power of a vagina is stronger than anything in this world.

(curious_fatbastard)

I once maintained a 49.5 / 50 in micro-processor programming and design. Yet some wymn got called the smartest one in the class (With < 35 marks) and got internship opportunities. That is when I truly gave up.

(Semibrevecel)

giga suifuel. is STEM really that cucked?

Beyond cucked and in multiple way I have like 1 foid in my class of 60 something students and that foid is liters surrounded by cucks that makes her homework, helps her at exams. Some time I literally feel she has no idea or care about what’s happening in the class.

(FJKEIOSFJ3tr33r)

Women are practically worshipped. All the big companies want to fill their quotas too, so they are taken for internships and jobs.

(RadiantUpstairs)

Yep, and at Yale the professors used to teach men this, in most Universities they did.

But then, in the 1960s, Yale started admitting females, and they were shocked that some professors taught their male students that women manipulate men using their vaginas and sex. This is really why sexual harassment policy was instituted, to make it "unwelcome, inappropriate comment" for a prof to say "and men, you gotta be careful, there are a lot of hungry vaginas out there wanting to eat you up and abuse you!"

(throwawwwawayaccount)

be a trap and shake your ass and then people will like your facebook posts bro!

don't be a phaggot

not being homo BUT it would work many closet homos are into traps

(dumb_intj)

Somehow I doubt real teenagers are blowing all their allowance on reddit gold.

What we have here is a shitload of 35 year old soyboys lurking in a forum for teenagers, and flipping their shit upon learning one of these vulnerable teens is a female.

REALLY MAKES YA THINK

Savagesusie #fundie freerepublic.com

They are one and the same. Both are irrational, vile behaviors and irrational ideology which uses others as a means to an end and is a collective, group-(non)-think, ideology where Truth (God/reality) and reason never exist.

That homosexuals “love” the people whom they desire to sodomize is the Big Lie. It is lust and desire to dominate (control). It is a perverted, warped vile desire (intrinsically disordered) which is caused because of child abuse and child neglect. All behaviors/desires are learned and habituated and trauma in childhood can really warp a child. Children in muslim cultures are severely traumatized, as are sexually abused children and those whom have no loving father figure or an evil mother.

Chastity Bono was raped by a lesbian as a child, as was Milk, Hays, Spacey, Milo, etc. etc. -—all behaviors are learned and habituated in childhood or perverted and warped because of neglect and abuse. The parent who allows the abuse to happen, loses all trust and the anger in a child will make them reject reality, Truth (God), etc. They hate and ability to “love” is warped completely. It is easy to emasculate little boys.

Warping children can be as simple as making little boys hate their fathers which is common for socialist (welfare) “mothers”. That natural need to connect to a male role model for little boys is severely warped and will lead to warped relationship with all males, as it is for girls who have no loving male role model (father). Destroying the Natural family was crucial to the Cultural Marxists who took over our institutions by the 50s—to collapse culture and destroy the virtue in children—so they will be warped.

The fixation in the puerile stage of latency is pure narcissism which is what homosexuality is—a fixation so that true love (selflessness) will not likely occur (the love of “the Other”—true diversity).

Islam is irrational, also, and sodomy is fine in islam, esp. with children. It is a homosexual culture and harems of boys are not abnormal. For procreation, they never allow the irrational concept of “homosexual” “marriage” since males learn to hate women anyhow, and visa versa, which is what homosexuality is all about—immaturity—the inability to love the Other.

Homosexuals love the Same which is always a fixation in latency. All little girls should prefer to play with girls and boys with boys. It is part of normal sexual identity formation which will lead to maturity if no trauma occurs (sex “ed” or rape or lack of loving role models of male and female).

Sex Ed now teaches little boys that they are homosexual in latency if they prefer boys over girls which warps their sexual identity.....as does ALL hyper sexualization of children. Sex Ed was a Lukacs/Adorno creation to destroy the Christian worldview in little children and fixate them in the latency stage and make them totally irrational, dumb, and immature (fixated in latency).

Immaturity is rampant in our culture now, because of the publik skool system which traps children in dependency and group (non) think for 12 years so maturity can never happen (thinking for self). Just programmed “bots” are what the evil, unconstitutional system pumps out.

Matt Forney #fundie mattforney.com

If you’re a girl pursuing anything more than a high school degree, you’re in all likelihood wasting your time.

Encouraging girls to go to college and grad school en masse is one of the biggest mistakes America has ever made. The flood of girls into universities is not only in part responsible for the current economic crisis, it’s made it increasingly difficult—if not impossible—for both girls and men to fulfill their natural roles. At the same time higher education has been degraded by so many unqualified girls getting accepted into college, those girls have seen their egos unjustifiably boosted by their degrees, making them unsuitable to be wives and mothers.

In order for society to be cured, this has to be fixed.

Here are my reasons why girls should be discouraged from going to college.
1. Going to college makes girls less attractive.

Girls, in their socially sanctioned solipsism, assume that men are turned on by the same things that they are. Because girls crave high status men, they assume that men similarly find their high status attractive, which couldn’t be further from the truth. No man alive has ever said, “God DAMN, I love the master’s degree on that girl!” It’s usually “God DAMN, she’s got a rack that could stop a runaway train!” or “God DAMN, this girl’s cooking is to die for!”

As a result, four plus years of college more often than not ruins a girl.

For starters, the extended adolescence that is college encourages sluttiness, which wrecks a girl all on its own. All those hunks splooging in her vagina make it more likely that she’ll end up divorcing the man she does end up marrying. Sluts are emotionally broken, incapable of loving and serving men, squandering their gifts of femininity and beauty, constantly trying to trade up for a bigger, better deal that never comes.

Marrying a slut is like paying full price for a beat-up old clunker.

Additionally, college is problematic because it gives girls the illusion of knowledge. Outside of STEM degrees (which are deficient in their own way), few majors actually impart useful information to girls, yet they still think they’re entitled to respect for having the degree; credentialism at its finest. Girls come out of college without being able to cook, sew, balance a checkbook or perform any of the necessary tasks of modern living, yet they still think they’re smart and independent and don’t you dare suggest otherwise. Don’t forget the massive amounts of student loan debt that these girls rack up, which you become in part responsible for if you’re dumb enough to put a ring on it.

Woman is not a learning animal.

The two most fulfilling relationships I’ve ever had were with girls who hadn’t yet graduated from college—one was midway through her degree and the other had not started yet—because they hadn’t had their minds poisoned by the lies of academia. They were fun to be around, girly, and eager to please. They hadn’t had their hearts broken through countless drunken hookups. When I explained something to them that they didn’t understand, they actually listened to me and did what I told them instead of accusing me of “mansplaining.”

If girls are like gold coins, sending them to college is like dunking them in nitric acid.
1a. Girls who go to college are extremely likely to get sexually assaulted.

Given the massive rape epidemic on college campuses, universities are massively unsafe places for girls. As feminists love reminding us, universities are ground zero for rape culture; one in four girls will be raped before the end of her college tenure. Given this information, why would anyone who cares about their daughter’s well-being let her do something as reckless as going to college?

You might as well parachute her into the worst part of Detroit with a “FREE FUCKTOY” sign taped to her back.
2. Most girls major in useless subjects that contribute nothing to the world.

Feminists love bragging about how girls are now earning the majority of college degrees, but they never bring up the fact that the majority of girls’ degrees are worthless in every way. Girls predominantly major in subjects like ethnic studies, women’s studies, English, communications and the like that require no work of any kind and give them no job prospects. As Aaron Clarey shows in this video, the majority of useful (STEM) degrees are still going to men.

What career prospects does a 22-year old girl with a bachelor’s in Arachnid Sexuality have? Dim ones.

If they’re lucky, they’ll end up becoming lawyers, civil servants or HR commissars, careers whose economic and social value is less than zero; those fields exist solely to employ the unemployable and leech off the productive. A select few might hit the jackpot and enter politics, where they can do an even better job of sucking our blood; Clarey showed in his book Worthless that the majority of American politicians have degrees in useless, parasitical subjects like law (Democrats more so than Republicans). But the vast majority of girls will end up living at home when they graduate, struggling to make their monthly student loan payments on a Starbucks salary.

Clearly, slaving away for minimum wage is way more fulfilling than being a wife and mother.

Furthermore, having all these girls “earning” these pointless degrees has lessened the value of a degree period. It’s common knowledge that the rarer something is, the more valuable it is. When our parents were our age, college degrees were uncommon enough that merely having one guaranteed you a good job, and you could secure most jobs with a one-hour interview. Now that everyone and their mother has a degree, employers cross-examine you like you’re on the witness stand, scrutinizing your GPA, your extracurriculars and making you complete stupid questionnaires that analyze how good of a “team player” you are, none of which has any bearing on how well you can do the job.

In their childish quest for “independence,” girls have made it more difficult for everyone—including themselves—to get a good-paying job.
3. Having girls working makes it more difficult for anyone to earn high wages.

It astounds me how so many feminists have absolutely no knowledge of economics. Here’s a hard lesson for you girls: labor is a commodity. And like all other commodities, labor is subject to the laws of supply and demand. When the supply of a commodity outpaces demand, its price (in this case, wages) goes down; when demand outpaces supply, the price goes up. This basic law is why a Walmart in Canton, Ohio is holding canned food drives for its own employees while the Walmart in Williston, North Dakota has to pay its workers $21 an hour and give them free hotel rooms; labor is plentiful in Ohio and scarce in North Dakota.

Leftists lament how wages have stagnated since the seventies and how the gap between the rich and poor has never been wider, but they can’t admit that feminism is a big reason why Americans are getting poorer by the day. The mass entry of girls into the workforce that began in the seventies conveniently coincides with the stagnation and decline of American wages, as well as the decline of unions. Whereas a man could comfortably support his family on his own back in the fifties and sixties, it takes both parents working to raise a family today, assuming the couple can even afford to buy a house and have children to begin with.

Additionally, the presence of girls in the labor force has feminized the economy and made it less productive as a whole. Because girls are unable and/or unwilling to actually take useful positions in the trades, manufacturing or other blue-collar fields (“Eww, I can’t mine coal! I might break a nail!”), the American economy had to be reconfigured to employ them somehow. The solution was to demonize the trades and create new useless white-collar positions such as “human resources.” Corporations used feminists as pawns to help promote outsourcing and free trade in the eighties/early nineties and push pointless office jobs as the new middle-class ideal. And all of those coveted white-collar jobs conveniently required a four-year degree, enriching the (leftist) universities as well.

As a result, we live in a country where a girl who makes $30,000 a year at a nonprofit is more highly regarded than an electrician who makes three times that.

Not only that, girls have altered the workplace itself for the worst. Government bureaucracies and other female-run institutions are governed by rules both written (e.g. sexual harassment laws) and unwritten that make it impossible to be frank, encouraging cattiness and backstabbing. And with few exceptions, female employees all act as volunteer commissars, ready to blow you in to the bossman the minute you upset their feeeeelings. You can’t be direct or honest because you never know what your co-workers will find offensive, making it difficult to get any work done.

But it gets worse than that: feminism is in part responsible for the current economic crisis.

It was girls’ desire for a never-ending supply of cheap crap (more than 80 percent of consumer spending is controlled by women) that resulted in the outsourcing of American manufacturing to China and the rise of big box stores like Walmart that squash local businesses and pay their workers the bare minimum allowed by law. It’s girls fornicating with wild abandon and divorcing their husbands on a whim that has lead to the epidemic of single moms and the subsequent strain on social services. It’s girls going to the doctor every time they get a boo-boo that has resulted in hard-working, healthy men like me having our insurance premiums skyrocket under Obamacare.

And it’s girls being unable to pay off their student loans that will lead to the next economic collapse.
4. Education (and work) are bad for girls’ physical and mental health.

It makes me laugh to see how effectively corporate America has made feminists into their most favored pets. Whenever feminists crow about the “end of men,” what they’re really saying is “Ha ha, we girls make WAY better slaves than you loser guys!” Jezebel and Gawker Media exemplify this contradiction best; all the girls writing there eagerly sound the gospel of female empowerment to make money for a man—Nick Denton—who pays them barely above minimum wage. “Yes Massa, Pax Dickinson is a misogynist racist asshat! Can I pretty please have a cookie, Massa?”

But beneath this you-go-grrl facade is a well of pain and suffering.

Despite all the feminists telling them that they should be happy to be “liberated,” female unhappiness is higher now than it’s ever been. Far more girls than men are suffering from mental illness, and antidepressant use among girls has gotten so bad that the drinking water of major cities like London is turning into a toxic soup. Every Strong, Independent Woman™ knows in her heart that her life is hell on Earth; it’s only her pride that keeps her from admitting the truth.

Recently, a friend of mine who quit her job to become a homemaker and returned to the workforce when her children grew older admitted to me that she preferred being a housewife. Why? It was less stressful. When she didn’t work, all she had to worry about was taking care of her kids, cooking and keeping the house clean. While she and her husband are wealthier now that they have two incomes, her life is never-ending misery. Her (female) boss constantly belittles and abuses her; her co-workers are gossipy do-nothings who refuse to pull their weight, making her pick up the slack; her health has deteriorated to the point where she’s developed stress-related carpal tunnel.

From the kitchen to the cubicle; isn’t freedom grand?

The reality is that girls always submit to men. It’s unavoidable. The only question is what kind of man she submits to. Will it be to a husband who protects her, provides for her and will love her until death do them part? Or will it be to a CEO like Nick Denton or some other corporate manager who views her as a tool to enrich himself, who will kick her to the curb as soon as she’s no longer useful? Even feminism itself is an invention of men, specifically Rousseau and the philosophers of the Enlightenment; Mary Wollstonecraft and other female “thinkers” were never more than sideshow freaks.

Deep inside, girls know what they want; they just need authoritative men to give it to them.

If you’re a girl, you should only go to college if you can meet one or more of these criteria:

Major in something useful. Here’s a pointer to figuring out if a degree is useful; does it involve math? If not, you’re wasting your time. I recommend Aaron Clarey’s Worthless if you want more info.
Go to a quality school. If you can’t make it into the Ivy League or another high-quality institution such as UVM or Binghamton, you have no business going to college.
Have your parents pay for it. I don’t mean co-signing your student loans, I mean having daddy take his wallet out and cover your costs in full. If you’re rich enough that your parents can afford college without any loans, it doesn’t much matter what you do.

The rest of you girls? We’re here to take you back to the place you secretly long to be, the place where you belong: the kitchen.

Now, on your knees!

nocehr #sexist reddit.com

Manlet = social suicide. It goes way beyond just dating

Many people only focus on dating aspect of height, but it greatly affects other aspects of life as well. Being a manlet means you get no respect. And it's harder to make friends. People over certain height don't even want to befriend you because it looks awkward, and hard to talk to you since the heads are not even on the same level.

Respect is very much needed in jobs of all kinds, otherwise you'd stuck at the bottom. Good luck getting a job as police, prison guard or firemen as a manlet because they all have mandatory height requirements. Low end jobs like bouncers and security guards are closed off to you as well you're just too weak and not intimidating enough. And school teacher? Not even kids will respect you, and don't think about highschool or middle school as a manlet you'd get mogged daily by the students. Pre-school teacher is closed off as well because you'd be suspected as a pedo by the parents.

Any senior/management positions in the job market will close off to you. You simply wouldn't be "seen" as a leader, so you'd never be promoted to one. You're stuck as the nice guy, and have to do all the real works while chads and normies get promoted after a couple years and now earns way more than you, having more social prestige than you, all the while doing less work.

It sucks bad because as an incel your only way to ascend is to try other ways such as moneymaxx statusmaxx socialmaxx but if you're a manlet, as explained above, these doors are pretty much closed off to you. You will be way more likely to be stuck at the bottom of the corporate hierarchy, you will have harder time to make and keep friends. All the negative reinforcements from life. Manlets = trucels. Manlet is social death. JFL at these fat foids thinking their life is hard. Manlets have it 10x harder and there's no way out.

Fred Reed #fundie takimag.com

It is time to get women out of the schooling of boys. It is way past time. Women in our feminized classrooms are consigning generations of our sons to years of misery and diminished futures. The evidence is everywhere. Few dare notice it.

The feminization is real. More than seventy-five percent of teachers are women; in New York state, over ninety percent of elementary school teachers are women; in the US, over seventy percent of psychologists are women, with (sez me) the rest being doubtful. This is feminization with fangs.

I have just read Back to Normal: Why Ordinary Childhood Behavior Is Mistaken for ADHD, Bipolar Disorder, and Autism Spectrum Disorder, by psychologist Enrico Gnaulati, who works with children alleged to have psychological problems in school, usually meaning boys. I decline to recommend it because of its psychobabble, its tendency to discover the obvious at great length, and its Genderally Correct pronouns, which will grate on the literate. (I mean constructions resembling “If a student comes in, tell him or her that he or she should put his or her books in his or her locker.”) However, a serious interest in the subject justifies slogging through the prose. (The statistics above are from the book.)

The relevant content is that women are making school hell for boys, that they have turned normal boyish behavior such as enjoyment of roughhousing into psychiatric “personality disorders.” They are doping boys up, forcing them into behavior utterly alien to them, and sending them to psychiatrists if they don’t conform to standards of behavior suited to girls. The result is that boy children hate school and do poorly (despite, as Gnaulati, says, having higher IQs). This is no secret for anyone paying attention, but Gnaulati makes it explicit.

As a galling example he cites one Robert, an adolescent responding badly to classes and therefore suspected by his teacher of having a “personality disorder.” From the book:


She required all forty students in the class to design Valentine’s Day cards for each other. She was emphatic about wanting them personalized. Names had to be spelled correctly and compliments written up genuinely.

Valentines? This was eighth-grade English. Students, who by then once knew grammar cold, should be reading literature or learning to write coherently. In my eighth-grade class, we read Julius Caesar: “I want the men around me to be fat, healthy-looking men who sleep at night.” Valentines? Compliments?

This, the author assures the reader, did not take place in an asylum for the mildly retarded, but in one of the ten best high schools in California. What must the rest be like?

Of course Robert was having trouble putting up with the girly drivel, this feminized ooze devoid of academic content. “Oooooh! Let’s have a warm, emotional bonding experience.”

This is why women should not be allowed within fifty feet of a school where boys are taught. A boy, especially a bright one, will want to drop out of school through the nearest window and run screaming to a recruiting office for the French Foreign Legion—anything to get away from inane, vapid, and insubstantial feel-good compulsory niceness inflicted by some low-wattage ed-school grad.

Get these ditz-rabbits away from our sons. Let us have separate schools for the sexes, with each being taught by teachers of the same sex. I do not presume to tell women what they should teach girls—astrophysics, valentine design with sincere compliments, whatever they like. Just stay away from the boys.

The thrust of current social propaganda is that the sexes are identical in all important respects. They are not. The differences are great. It is time we stopped pretending otherwise.

First: By their nature, females are far more interested in social relationships than in academic substance. If you are a man, ask yourself how often you have serious intellectual discussions of politics, science, history, or society with women as compared to men. Seldom. Degrees and exceptions, yes. Still, seldom.

Second: Women are totalitarian. Men are happy to let boys be boys and girls be girls. Women want all children to be girls. In school this means emphasizing diligence—neat homework done on time, no matter how silly or academically vacuous—over performance, meaning material learned. Women favor docility, orderliness, cooperation in groups, not making waves, niceness, and comity. For boys this is asphyxiating.

Robert #fundie menarebetterthanwomen.com

Given not everyone can afford having more than one woman.. wives, like dogs, when well trained and full of unconditionally love they are a great thing.

As a polygamous Mormon, I can honestly stay that all of my wives (6 of them) are a joy to have. In Mormonism we stress maintaining high levels of physical fitness, we watch what we eat very carefully (Fundamentalist only eat food they have grown them selves) so really if maintained (like a car, or anything really) you can get that "demi more" effect..

Like Masterson said, if a woman is fat, lazy or in any other way undesirable it's because you fucked up and didn't train her properly. Also might I add you are doing a grave disservice to the female as well as your self when you choose not to manage them correctly.

When you do have an old girl who has loyal served you, you grow very attached to her as you would with a pet or that old shirt you keep around because of all the good memories attached to it.. ect.. You don't have to sleep with her, and you normally have a few young ones rearing to go anyhow.

David J. Stewart #conspiracy jesusisprecious.org

I'm so sick of lame preachers who are woefully ignorant that the 911 attacks were an inside job. Do your homework! There's nothing more repulsive than to hear some country preacher fifteen years after the 911 attacks still talking about Muslims flying two planes into the World Trade Center (WTC) towers as the cause of their implosion. THERE WERE BOMBS IN THE BUILDINGS!!! How do 2 planes bring down 3 buildings? Obviously, they can't. Furthermore, in the history of high-rise fires, some of which totally incinerated the towers, not one building has ever crumbled to the ground, let alone 3 in one day!!!

Thousands of architects, engineers and experts have testified that it is IMPOSSIBLE for jet fuel to bring an entire skyscraper to the ground. Those WTC buildings imploded to the ground in less than 15 seconds. WTC 7 a block north was never struck by a plane and imploded to the ground in less than 7 seconds! When a preacher believes the bogus official story of 911, it makes him look woefully ignorant and discredits him in the eyes of those who are more knowledgeable about the truth than he is. No one should be more aware of the truth than the preacher!!!

Alfred W. Clark #fundie occamsrazormag.wordpress.com

The Left wants to use Christianity to police the Alt-Right

Left-wing, Jewish journalist Peter Beinart has a telling piece up at The Atlantic, “Breaking Faith: The culture war over religious morality has faded; in its place is something much worse,” about how the decline of Christianity has lead to an increase in racial identity, especially among many younger whites affiliated with the alt-right. He writes:

“Secularism is indeed correlated with greater tolerance of gay marriage and pot legalization. But it’s also making America’s partisan clashes more brutal. And it has contributed to the rise of both Donald Trump and the so-called alt-right movement, whose members see themselves as proponents of white nationalism. As Americans have left organized religion, they haven’t stopped viewing politics as a struggle between “us” and “them.” Many have come to define us and them in even more primal and irreconcilable ways.”

As if there is something wrong with whites supporting and promoting their own interests. Beinart then discusses Richard Spencer, Milo, and how secularization has lead to an increase in racial identity among both younger blacks and whites. He concludes:

“Maybe it’s the values of hierarchy, authority, and tradition that churches instill. Maybe religion builds habits and networks that help people better weather national traumas, and thus retain their faith that the system works. For whatever reason, secularization isn’t easing political conflict. It’s making American politics even more convulsive and zero-sum.

For years, political commentators dreamed that the culture war over religious morality that began in the 1960s and ’70s would fade. It has. And the more secular, more ferociously national and racial culture war that has followed is worse.”

Beinart is basically correct but there is more to this story. The two most basic forms of identity are racial / ethnic identity and religious identity. When the two intersect and form an ethno-religion, which is basically what Judaism is, the religion of Beinart’s co-ethnics, one probably has the strongest identity possible. (Most early pagan religions were also racial ethno-religions, and arguably some forms of Christianity are too.)

The problem, however, is that Beinart can’t just wave his magic wand and resurrect Christianity to police white people — as much as he may wish it. The irony is that mainstream Christianity today is on a universalist trajectory that would repel the very people that Beinart wants to police. As I noted in a previous post, “Is Contemporary Christianity a Suicide Cult?,” contemporary Christianity is becoming more and more effeminate and seems to repulse more manly men. For example, regarding the recent controversy to expel open-borders Russell Moore from his leadership of the ERLC, just take a look on Twitter at some of Moore’s most ardent defenders: Nearly all of them literal cuckolds or Christian SJWs.

In short, Beinart fails to recognize that Christianity had a greater hold on young white men when it was in fact more like the alt-right, when it wasn’t as extremely universalistic as it is today and didn’t eschew racial identity for whites.

Mike King #sexist tomatobubble.com

In this mad, mad, mad Marxist world of ours, leave it to Sulzberger's Slimes, in the immediate aftermath of the murder of a New York City female police officer, to praise the "progress" that has been made with regards to the hiring and promoting of female police officers.

From the article:

"And across the nation, women have pushed their way into policing’s most demanding jobs. To them, Officer Familia’s death was seen as a grim signifier of their growing front-line roles."

There are now 6,394 female officers on a force of just over 36,000 in dangerous New York City. That's almost 18%. The percentages in other cities that are even more dangerous are about the same and growing -- with more and more of them being killed "in the line of duty" every year. This is all part of the "progress" that "women's liberation" has brought to today's miserable, manified, modern woman. Thusly "liberated" from the "yoke" of marriage and traditional family life, the loony ladies now get to dress up in blue, carry a gun, chase bad guys through dark alleys, and then get killed -- often with their own gun.

A blast from the past, from the article, about a hyped-up event which your New York metro-area high-school aged reporter here remembers very well:

"In the early 1980s, the New York City subways were forbidding, with robbers lurking in graffiti-covered cars. Very few women were on patrol, but Officer Irma Lozada took one of the most dangerous jobs: She hid her badge and draped fake gold chains around her neck, courting robbers to come after her in some of the most desperate parts of Brooklyn.

It was on one of these plainclothes assignments in 1984 when something went terribly wrong: Officer Lozada chased a suspect, got separated from her partner and was killed after the suspect wrested her service revolver from her and shot her twice."

She became the first female officer killed in New York City history. So jolted was the police force by her death that, in the aftermath, some officers spoke of women being better off reassigned to office jobs, several people recalled."

Yes indeed, you've come a long way, baby!" How's it workin' out for ya?

In a healthy pre-Marxist society, dead officerettes Irma Lozada and Miosotis Familia would have been home cooking dinner for their husbands and checking the kids' homework.

As it was with the mentally sick reaction to the death of Officerette Lozada then, so it is again today with Officerette Familia, who was shot and killed execution-style by an admitted cop-hater, just last week. Rather than reassess this abominable practice of sending women off to fight criminals and enemy soldiers, the unisex Marxists act as if it's part of the normal course of business and continue to praise the "progress" that these misguided police-gals and Marine-ettes are making.

The societal perverison of cultural Marxism / libtardism offers oppression to women, not "liberation." How much happier, safer, and alive would Ms. Lozada and Ms. Familia had been if they were stay-at-home wives and mothers. Of course, given how the corresponding economic hands of Marxist taxation & the Fed's debt-currency racket make it increasingly impossible for a woman to stay home -- because a huge chunk of her husband's earnings (if she even has a husband), are taxed and inflated away -- these ladies are often forced to work. How hypocritically ironic it is that the Left condemns the Taliban for banning women from the workforce, as we here in the oh-so-enlightened West essentially, through economic policies, ban women from becoming traditional housewives!

Even when faced with the horrible murders and ghastly battlefield casualties of the fairer sex, very few of today's "men," especially those in the public realm, will dare to question the perverse policy of depriving strong men from 18% of police jobs just so that mostly infertile women can take them, and get killed. Chivalry truly is dead -- as is sanity!

The Great One (that's Hitler for you all newbies and normies) had a few observations on this matter. And his truth, no matter how out-of-fashion it may seem to the modern libtard, will always be the truth. Tell it Great One, tell it:

"If I think to myself that a woman should make an appearance at a trial, then I have to say: if that were a woman close to me, and if I wanted to imagine my mother were still alive and has to sit in front of a murderer in a court and decide the verdict,... never, never! We don't want that.

I do not want a uniformed female police officer to walk around and run after scamps or criminals. These are things we naturally don't want. Then they say, 'Excuse me, you don't allow women in the parliament as well.' Certainly, but only because I am satisfied that the parliament does not raise the value of women, but it would only degrade her. I also removed the men from parliament because they were all rotten. (Reichstag laughter)

Then they say, "Why not put some good women into parliament." Because they would turn rotten too. (more laughter)

...

A women's regiment of snipers is being trained in the Soviet Union... grenadiers in Spain (pre-Franco). All I can say about this type of female equality -- I have experienced war. I know how hard it is. I know how many men’s nerves have been shattered by war. I have often seen them return by the dozens, doddering, completely ruined and broken. The idea that a girl or woman should take this upon herself --- I could have no respect for German men then. As long as we have a healthy male gender in Germany, no female sharpshooters or grenadiers will be trained in Germany. That is no equality, but rather, inferior rights for women because it is much harder for her than men. We won’t do it – because for us, the woman has been the most faithful work and life companion of the man at all times."

Hitler: "The catchword “Women’s Liberation” is merely a phrase invented by the Jewish intellect, and its contents are marked by the same spirit. The German woman will never need to emancipate herself in an age supportive of German life. She possessed what Nature gave her automatically as an asset to maintain and preserve; just as the man, in such an age, never had to fear that he would be ousted from his position in respect to woman."

No wonder why women loved Him so. The Great One cherished and protected them from the "progress" that Jewish-Marxist "liberation" offered them.

Boobus Americanus 1: It' a shame what happened to that female police officer.

Boobus Americanus 2: Indeed. Unfortunately, such tragedies are the price for the tremendous progress that women in law enforcement are making.

Sugar: "Progress, my asss, Bobusss!! Thesse deluded dames sshould have sstayed home and raissed a litter -- like I did!

Editor: How come your kitty children never call you? The bastards.