Similar posts

Lincoln Was A Conservative #fundie answers.yahoo.com

" The terms "left wing" and "right wing" came from the French Revolution. The politicians who sat on the left wanted to reject the existing government, while the politicians on the right wanted to preserve the existing government. That's why the right wing is commonly called "conservative." The left wing was characterized by more liberal policies, so the left wing is commonly called "liberal."

During the Civil War, the southern states were so determined to reject the government that they seceded from the Union. So clearly they were definitively left wing.

Lincoln and the Republicans were devoted to preserving the Union by preventing the militant radical left wing states from seceding. So clearly they were definitively right wing.

Lincoln sought to cause change within the established framework of the constitutional process of lawmaking and executive authority. The southern states sought to depart from this established framework by rejecting it completely. This illustrates the conservative constitutional stance of Lincoln, as opposed to the militant radical stance of the left wing southern states, which used radical violence to pursue an agenda that was based on a revolt against the existing government. The southern states fired the first actual cannon shots of the Civil War at Fort Sumter, which illustrates their militant radicalism.

After the south lost the Civil War, they continued their militant radicalism by forming the KKK to use intimidation tactics in pursuit of their political agenda, which continued to be based on rebelling against the existing and established government.

Anyone who says otherwise is just spouting left wing propaganda.

This is so clear and obvious, how can anyone disagree? "

Dr. Paul Craig Roberts #conspiracy globalresearch.ca

The only thing we can conclude from the facts is that the United States Government and those ignorant fools who worship it are evil incarnate.

Out of evil comes dictatorship. The White House Fool, at best a two-bit punk, has decided that he doesn’t like the Second Amendment to the US Constitution any more than he likes any of the other constitutional protections of US citizens. He is looking for dictatorial methods, that is, unlegislated executive orders, to overturn the Second Amendment. He has the corrupt US Department of Justice, a criminal organization, looking for ways for the dictator to overturn both Congressional legislation and Supreme Court rulings.

The media whores have fallen in line with the would-be dictator. All we hear is “gun violence.” If only Karl Marx were still with us. He would ridicule those who turn inanimate objects into purposeful actors. It is extraordinary that the American left-wing thinks that guns, not people, kill people.

The position of the “progressive left-wing” in the United States is perplexing. Here are Americans, immersed into a police state, as are the Hammonds, and the progressive left-wing wants to disarm the population.

Whatever this “progressive left-wing opposition” is, it has nothing in common with revolutionaries. The American left-wing is totally irrevelant, a defeated force that sold out and no longer represents the people or the truth.

various commenters #fundie breitbart.com

Re: Fact Check: Video Games Do *Not* Cause Violence

(Jjabba)
What about the feminized culture that drives the use of these drugs because it regards being a boy as a disease?

(VulpesRex)
I think you hit the nail on the head. The leftist culture that exists in orgs like the APA, taking its cues from the gender theory and third-wave feminist movements, treats masculinity as toxic. Boys who act like boys are diagnosed with AD&D, EDD, or ODD, and are psychologically neutered with anti-psychotic drugs while their minds are still developing.

If you are a parent, and you give in to pressure from your public school district to put your son on psych-drugs, you deserve to be hung upside down over a pit of lava.

(Seriously?)
The inability to read the non-verbal social cues that have been the halmark of human society is approaching crisis level. It's not just that it shows up in these kinds of violent break-downs, but it's also a huge part of the "sexual harassment" crisis that has been steadily making its rounds through every sport and every sector of our society.

(FreedomPlease)
Disintegration of the nuclear family, family values, discipline, and morality are all the banners of liberals. So to sum it up, liberals are the problem with our society.

(dtom2)
And God help the white boy. He's the politically approved target for all things vile.

(Ajohn)
Not if he claims gayness. He will then be exonerated from all white guilt.

(AlwaysTryYourBest)
Not if he is conservative, gay and white. Milo is the example.

(Pleiades R)
by the liberal media and a few followers...

do you actually think it is a national movement?

LOL and you make the "weakness" issue seem correct when you fear a liberal media facade... like, "hillary is going to win" "declare war on white guys"

I have an idea, act like ideal men... intelligent, strong, respectful, defenders of family and neighborhood....
be the role model decent people admire....
and ignore the sour grapes of liberal self haters....

don't let the turkeys make you act like the whiners they want everyone to be, just like them

and I notice, you miss the fact.... .. white women are being treated poorly too..... heroic guy....
you know, a lot of strong women, become so because there are no longer the caring men....

(The reality bites...you)
Look for disabled parking permits for all penis owners...coming soon.

(AlwaysTryYourBest)
What about transgender penis owners. Have you heard they like to complain in the military the drills are too hard. So they play both sides. Just like gays. They are behaving only part way the other gender. The point is that it is not a true full blown transgender in the mentally ill minds. Gays the same. They only take on part of other gender behavior. The point is that these are mental illnesses that the left is trying to justify as normal.

(Glaucon1)
The problem with your argument is that the academic, post-modernist feminists are "feminists", and the colloquial use of "feminist" is incorrect. Actual feminism began in universities, and "feminism" is used to describe a particular gender theory that derives its central themes from Marxist conflict theory. Somehow, perhaps deliberately, folk vernacular conflated "feminism" with "women's rights" to denote any collective action women took to achieve equal rights.

(b.macintosh)
Equal pay for equal work has been the law for decades. If they can't compete it's because they are no good and shouldn't be allowed to jeopardize the quality of work or the pocketbooks of their employer. They generally pay too much attention to relationships at work while men and non feminist women are able to focus on the task alone. We know this because we see it time and time again.
Feminists manipulated young women into believing their only value was as a careerist. Pushing women into the workplace doubled the work force and halved the wage and now women who understand how important it is to raise their own children can't unless they marry a wealthy man and that's an unrealistic goal. Women will never be as important as the children they once raised. Day care and preschool made them redundant, not just men.
The fact is that domestic women had all the real power. Western civilization was built to provide for and protect the children they raised. The social mores and rules of living were set by and for women. The hand that rocked the cradle really did rule the rule. Thst's why poll after poll could never come up with more than 25% of women calling themselves feminist, but feminists do not care whst women want, just what they alone want.

Feminists always throw in this specious crap "or the kind of gal who allows herself to be beaten when her "big strong man" is drunk... is that what you had in mind?" The vast majority of men live their entire lives without ever once hitting a woman, even when they're hit by abusive women. That's the kind of demonizing of men that is so perverse.

(Cahal the Mad™)
"Too many kids running around that can't distinguish fantasy and reality."

And THAT is the direct result of indoctrination, propaganda, and lies by left-wing public schools, the left-wing media, left-wing "parents", left-wing Hollywood, and left-wing politicians.

(Cinj)
And the parents that allow it. If one won't stand up for themselves at least stand up and fight for your own child. If enough people stood up to this nonsense we could start beating it back, but too many lemmings out there content to do what the idiot box tells them to do while sending their kids off to the local indoctrination camp for the free daycare.

FrostyB #fundie steamcommunity.com

???? ?????????????????? ??????????????????

To set some standards straight, before you read:
If you're ever so willing to read a Manifesto, please do read with an open-mind as the close-minded would see through the conveying message of the Manifesto.
Also yes, I am quite serious when I say I'm a Neo-Fascist, I'm politically active and bloody proud:

I was once a "Democratic-Socialist" in my early stages when I was learning about politics, because I was influenced by the nice sounding words "equality", "diversity" and "acceptance".
My friends, my teachers, even the media spoke greatly of the Left-Wing and how everyone has "human rights" and also how it is religiously affiliated as a just and moral cause to help your fellow human being.
I loved everything about the Left-Wing at the time, it sounded so right, so justifiable to fight for us all to unite as one equally same human being, sharing our own customs and traditions amongst foreign men in the country I loved dearly.
Well, that was until I started opening my eyes to the Left-Wings destructive nature.
It all started with the 2014 Sydney hostage crisis, it shocked everyone in Australia and the world.
I was shocked and surprised that it was done by a Muslim, and so, after school, I went home to research more about Islam, the further I dug I came to read online that Islam was a violent cult.
I was often told that Islam was a religion of peace so this left me very confused, the next day I confronted my Muslim friend about the violent quotes in the Quran I read online, to which he responded "They're lying, it's not in the Quran, they take it out of context", and so the next week as I was further driven by curiosity I borrowed the English version of the Quran from my local library to see if it was true what the so-called "Nazis" said online about Islam.
To my surprise, it was true, the standard version of the Quran was indeed true to holding many violent phrases against the "Infidels".
I felt betrayed, my Muslim friend and the teachers lied to me about Islam, to then they've lost my trust that they are teaching us accurate information, so I started questioning everything they've taught me thus far and started researching everything learning more deeply in its roots to see if it is at all accurate.
I became even more curious the more deeper I researched and started questioning the morals of "equality" and even the technical tenets of the Left-Wing, as curiosity led me to only more questions about everything I've learnt about Religion, Diversity, Equality and the so called "good and just" cause of the Left-Wing.
To everything I thought was morally right, correct and good in its practise, bad and evil I found myself to be very wrong.
Throughout all my research, I have concluded to find myself to be in total disbelief, I was in shock, I felt total agony to my discovery that me, my friends, my family and the fellow European brothers of descent that we were indeed living in a political dystopia, as it is true.
The more I thought about it, the more it became clear to me of what I thought reality once was, is now collapsing into what I know as the very real reality, it left me completely stunned.
I was shattered, morally, religiously, and politically.
To my conclusions, learning that by human nature and its principles, we are indeed not equal nor the same at all.
We are all different for a reason, as I am now convinced religiously and politically, we are not infact equal at all, but unique.
By keeping our Customs, Traditions, Ethics & Ethnics separate, we are playing by basic human nature, as it was always intended to be.
By nature, I am also talking religiously by Gods and God them self that we were always meant to be a unique blossom of different cultures and customs in its purest form, like a unique colour in the Rainbow.
As for example, when you combine all the colours together, it creates a disgusting brown darkish colour, it creates a mess.
The same with different cultures, as by natures fundamentals it is proven that different cultures do not mingle, but collide.
As such as the animals that we are, you never see the bear befriending the fish.
Nor see the Rhino mate with the Elephant, it was never intended to be, it doesn't work by nature.
Race mix is simply a form of destruction, a form of impurity, like a detached link from your ancestors blood and from the soil on which you live on.
By Left-Wing nature, in its true form and purpose is a self-destructive political monster of corruption that favours imaginative thoughts over realpolitikal action which goes against the very statically set principles of human nature to which they call "progressive Globalism", which is infact regressive and dangerous in its true form, created to trick the light-minded, the vulnerable and gullible people who is politically active into voting for disaster profiteers.
Alike Democracy as I've learnt, people are tricked into voting for the dangerous, destructive and corrupt Left-Wing and other regressive parties.
To which also in its other form on the Right-Wing such as Centre-Right like Liberalism are no better than the Left-Wing as it is a different form of Leftism "Globalism" but for the Right-Wing, in which Liberalism populates and fundamentally favours bigot groups for those who don't think regressively and to punish those who dare to think differently from the fundamental tenets of Leftism/Liberalism like the groups that are born from a Liberal democracy such as Antfia, "Anti-Fascist", and other fantastical anti-fundamentalist groups like LGBT where there is more than 2 genders or even Black Lives Matter where the foreign man deserves superior living conditions to the Native White European man in his very own country for all the supposed "evils" our White ancestors have done in the past that have created the great Western world we have today.
In all of this further proving what I believe in and why I do, we need to remove the dangerous Left-Wing and Democracy itself, it favours a false idea of freedom which ultimately leads to the destructive nature of Leftist and Liberal agenda's as such for example bringing the foreign man first before the Native people, as well as giving a false sense of equality that hides the destructive nature of democracy.
The Western world needs Social order more than ever, we need an authoritarian system that would lead us beyond the Left-Right spectrum of politics, a leader, a hero, for those to look up to, to inspire and to install within the people the values of the Western man, the ideal citizen body who rules with an Iron grip, who would light the way for the future generations of our great Western Nations to her survival and for those of descent to look back at our great unique history with pride and glamour to say I am proud to be a White Native European of descent, of this blood, of this soil that we share with one custom, one culture, one tribe, in this great Nation of ours where security is strong, where we are safe and where we live and prosper in this Utopia amongst fellow Western men of the same descent, we are free, we are safe, long live the West, long live Europe, we belong here, this is our country, this is our people of whom share the same blood, we are of the Western world, of European blood, we are Australian and this is what equal is!
Do your research before you are quick to judge and never be afraid to think independently from others, I'd rather die knowing I was living the truth about politics and its nature rather than to live my whole life believing in a lie just because the Media, my teachers, and my friends says its true, don't be fooled!

Africa for Africans!
Asia for Asians!
Europe for Europeans!
Dogs for dogs and cats for cats!
This is natures rule, and it will stay that way forever.
Religious or not, this is the intentions!
This is the correct and true European way of life, through one cultural unification, through order, and by blood and soil.

Stephen Smith #wingnut santaclaritafree.com

The question I keep hearing from friends and family who follow current events is, “How did things get like this?”

Puzzlement is understandable.

Said about President Trump by the left:

There are vicious attacks on his policies and his requests of legislation for asylum and immigration laws, which are remarkably similar to liberal Democrat Presidents Barack Obama and Bill Clinton.

He is charged with being the most divisive President in history, while his actions and policies reflect traditional American values more than any President in memory apart from Ronald Reagan. The division is being caused by the often repeated lies and out of context statements being made by his accusers. The media and Democrats speak in lockstep, using the exact same phrases attributed to Nazi Joseph Goebbels, “Repeat a lie often enough and it becomes the truth.” Leftists use fascist tactics, not President Trump.

President Trump has been charged with the usual litany of sins chanted by the left. They are all based on race, class, gender and now sexual orientation. Those who know him best and have worked for him, refute these charges. It seems that those on the left, who live life with unreasoned hate, ignore evidence.

America’s Mandatory Re-Education and Indoctrination Centers
Communist countries have a history of killing, imprisoning or re-educating people who act against or don’t conform to their left-wing ideology. Conformity is expected, news is regulated and suppressed, and the media and educational systems are required to follow and promote the party line.

Democratic Western nations are moving toward the adoption of these policies. The United Kingdom now incarcerates people who violate their requirements for politically correct speech; for example, you may be imprisoned for referring to a man, who identifies as a woman, as a man.

Some American liberals claim this could not occur here. Moderate and conservative Americans generally believe that our principles will prevail. They are wrong. Not enough attention is given to what is happening at colleges and the rest of our education establishments.

Most of our colleges are run and controlled by left-wing radical “educators.” Many professors will acknowledge they are socialist, communist or otherwise left-wing. Any conservative teacher who speaks up, risks losing employment. Only ideologies of the left are tolerated.

Students are told what they must believe. Dissenters are ridiculed and bullied by their professors and fellow students. Their grades suffer, or they face expulsion.

California requires mandatory college classes. At first this was for the basics or reading, writing, mathematics and government. These were covered in the first two years of college. Then they added indoctrination classes. More recently, recognizing the need, more indoctrination classes were made mandatory in the second half of college. Of course, radicals will promote their philosophy whatever the class may be.

To complete college, one must take such indoctrination classes as American Racism, Disparity of Income and various others that are anti-capitalist, anti-American or promote the conversion of our country into some form of Socialist utopia. Many parents would be offended if they knew of all these classes, so restrictions were placed on the dissemination of college class catalogues and the classes being taken by one’s own kids.

Anyone wanting a career dependent on a college education has no choice but to submit to the process. It should be no surprise that the young and impressionable get radicalized.

To make matters worse, tuitions are enormous, student loans are readily available and many classes are useless. This makes the college graduate both dependent and resentful when they are burdened with paying off these debts. While the colleges promote student loan waivers or publicly paid college for all, they ignore the major factors in education costs. University of California professors get full time pay for 3-6 hours of teaching per week. Many professors supplement their income by requiring the purchase of an unnecessary text that they wrote.

You may think your pre-college kids are safe — teachers in grade school work much harder and you know what classes the kids are taking. Remember, teachers are educated at indoctrination centers.

Driving a wedge between students and parents, California has instituted and modified sex-education classes that require or encourage secrecy and non-disclosure to parents. These programs appear to advocate sex regardless of a person’s gender, and offer contraceptives and abortions without parental disclosure.

Rationally, one might thing that graduates ultimately would recognize that the propaganda classes should be replaced with practical courses such as managing personal finances, understanding investments or even home making. If the indoctrinators are successful, instead they will be advocating that everyone must conform to what they perceive as proper thought.

President Trump’s economic and foreign policies are demonstrably working. Income and employment for all races and classes are up, inflation is under control and 401ks are at record highs.

North Korea is in check, we are negotiating with China and the rest of the world for more fair-trade agreements, our relationship with Israel is the best in history and Iran will comply or collapse. Regardless, for some unknown reason all the Democrat Presidential candidates want to reverse the policies that are currently serving all American people so well.

Resigning Labor Secretary Alex Acosta has been viciously attacked by Democrats because they say that some 10 years ago, as a prosecutor in Florida, he had not adequately charged the vile sexual criminal Jeffrey Epstein. The Democrats were somehow trying to make this reflect on President Trump who had thrown Epstein out of his club, Mar-a-Lago, years ago. Unaccused was President Clinton, who was often a guest on Epstein’s private plane (Lolita Express) that was used to transport underage girls to his private island for sex. Over the years, John Kerry, Chuck Schumer and the Clintons all gladly accepted donations from the registered sexual predator. Crickets from the media.

These are but a few examples that reflect how America, our core values and rational thought are under assault by the most intolerant religion, the progressive left. It now dominates public education, corrupts the minds of our children and is in the process of re-writing our history in its own image. We are engaged in a great civil war. The battle is liberty and free market capitalism vs. the tyranny of socialism and fascism by the leftist progressives.

To begin engaging in this battle against the fascist/socialist left we must start with two things.

First – become armed with our foundational roots by educating ourselves on traditional American and Judeo/Christian core values. You may begin that process by watching the short videos at Prager University and taking the free online courses available at Hillsdale College.

Second – we must take back our educational system and put the brakes on the advancement of the left. We must support home schooling. We must transform our school choices to one where Americanism, traditional civics, western civilization and traditional values can be taught; rather than only the social agenda and revisionist history that are being taught now in our progressive dominated schools. Free market solutions can be found at www.SchoolChoice2020.org.

The revolution begins with you.

MarineSentinel #racist freerepublic.com

White democrats, liberals, elitists, leftists, progressives, left wing-nuts, communists, socialists, gays, lesbians, leftist loons, mentally handicapped—meaning their vocabulary is so small it would fit in a navel cavity of a flea, Nazis, republican rhinos who are really democrat insider fools, traitors, anti-Americans, and yes last but not least my favorite—lying maggot politicians are the most racists individuals around. This is a fact that these racists purposely try to shove off on their opponents namely Conservatives. The truth hurts and if ever there was a time where racism is more visible than today it is none other by these kooks I’ve mentioned.

Dr. Ben Carson a renowned neurosurgeon who put it truthfully and factually that “Liberals are the most racist people there are.” He is right and they can’t deal with a black man telling the truth about them and how they really think. This isn’t something new; these crazies have always been racists who date back to the “KKK” and slavery. They are the ones responsible for the many deaths associated with and committed by the “KKK” period. Dr. Ben Carson has made all of these kooks nervous and they don’t know how to deal with him especially coming from a successful educated black man.

I recently saw this racism on full display yesterday when a known liberal such as Bob Beckel went nuts over Dr. Ben Carson telling the truth about liberals. Bob Beckel said about Carson, that most liberals don’t care what he Carson says or thinks. This was his whole point genius Beckel couldn’t wrap his mind around that “White liberals and the rest of these kooks don’t care about blacks or other minorities who are different from them, ergo he and his “White liberals are racist.

The reason the liberals and the rest of their kook fringe are after Dr. Carson is they view him with the Uncle Tom tactic they tried with Herman Cain. Its funny how these crazies call us racist but when a decent Conservative black man who believes in God and tells it like it is they turn the table on him. Dr. Martin Luther King said it’s not the color it’s the content. This alone sheds 100% light on their racist’s views. Dr. Carson is the mesquite thorn in the racist lefts a**, both uncomfortable and poisonous which the truth does that.

Dr. Carson revealed what a loser Obama and his ilk really are; at the bottom of the barrel if you ask me. The liberals and the rest of these kooks are scared of him because he is a brilliant man and he is everything that they and Obama are not. Obama and his ilk=affirmative action and Dr. Carson=All Merit. The liberals and the left remain on their road to destruction and they are dragging the country down with them. The true Patriots of America must do all they can to take back our country.

I recently read a column about Dr. Ben Carson’s up and coming book where he makes a great and valid point. He says that it is just as much about racism to vote for someone because he is black, just because he is black even though you don’t agree with his politics. I have never voted this way for any President and those who have should be ashamed. Liberals may not care what Dr. Carson has to say now, but soon they will know if they don’t already he is their worst nightmare. Dr. Ben Carson is a prime example that America truly does work and liberals despise him for it. This President really thinks “White Liberals” actually like him. I’m here to say NOPE, they don’t. They are just using him like Bob Beckel to help him bring down the country. I say keep talking “White Liberals and the rest of their kooks, you are making our point.

The flip side to “White Liberals” is the “Black Liberals” who espouse to the same playbook. These crazies have fallen into the trap of actually believing “White Liberals” care for them when in reality they think blacks are not capable of doing things on their own. “White Liberals” truly believe that if you’re not white you are not capable. Why else would liberals demand affirmative action? Affirmative Action has done nothing more than exacerbate black poverty period. Look at most poor neighborhoods; they are all Democrat represented areas, Always. “White Liberals” always pat you on the head and tell you you’re so brilliant, but not brilliant enough to get anywhere on your own. We 20 years later have a President reaffirming everything we know to be true about “White Liberal” mentality. From his lips to our ears—“You didn’t build that, you didn’t get there on your own.” Molon Labe.

JackHectorman #fundie republicanoperative.com

... think about this: We Conservatives are 10 times tougher than these mentally-pink-panty wearing liberals, moderates, and RINOs, and we can survive better in severe hard times than they can, and besides that Spartan times produces a Spartan citizenry ...the same hot boiling sun that melts the butter also hardens the clay (soft warm butter is a good metaphore for liberals/moderates/RINOs don't ya think ? ), and steel is made inside a hot furnace not inside Disney World.
I'm not a kamikaze, but if worse come to worse, we Conservatives can play ( and WIN ) the "Wreck The Country" game better than these American Liberal-Socialists-Commies ( And RINOs) can play it. I will not play the old game of "Chicken" if I can get out of it...you know where they get their cars up to about 80 miles per hour and head straight into each other to see who will turn aside first, but if I find myself in a situation where I must play that game then the other driver will turn aside first or we will find out what happens when two cars going 80 miles per hour crash into each other. The moral of that story is this: If it ever does work out where the soft weak girlie-men Socialists - Commie - Liberals get really hungry as in no food the last week while they are living in unheated houses in the dead of winter, etc ...it will be THEY not we Conservatives who "turn aside first."

There is a huge Old Guard of true Bible believing Christian Family Men in America that are making a sincere effort to be good Christian husbands and fathers and to raise their children in the fear of the Lord and teach them to do what is right and they are in the three main Tribes of America: the White European Americans, Black Americans, and Hispanic Americans, and we number in the tens of millions. The Sovereign God will not forsake His people, His Church, in hard times (if hard times does come) and we Christians can endure hard times better than these soft snot-nosed Liberal - Socialists - Commies can endure hard times **BigGrin**.

YOUGOTIT #fundie freerepublic.com

“In his new book, American Fascists: The Christian Right and the War on America, Hedges insists that today’s evangelical Christians are good old-fashioned fascists and Nazis reborn.”
Another left-wing fascist liar. Hitler was a left-wing Democrat as all multi-killers of the 20th century have been. Hitler (7 to 15 million), Stalin (25 to 35 million), Pol Pot (1 to 5 million), Saddam (1 to 6 million) and the list of left-wing scum goes on and on. The left has been responsible for more killing and dictators than any group who believes in small government and freedom like the right of the Republican party.

Linda Goudsmit #fundie conservativenewsandviews.com

Religion and religious freedom gone wild

The First Amendment guarantees Americans the freedom of religion in the “establishment” clause:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Words matter, so the first question that must be answered is a matter of definition.

What is religion?

The dictionary defines religion as:

1. The belief in and worship of a superhuman controlling power, especially a personal God or gods.
2. A particular system of faith and worship.
3. A pursuit or interest to which someone ascribes superhuman importance.

Dictionaries have been used for centuries to help codify the meaning of words in an attempt to make language useful. Without accepted specific meanings for words it is impossible to communicate through language effectively. Language is the common denominator of speech. Even biblical stories express the importance of the meaning of words as they are understood or misunderstood in any language. The most famous example is the biblical story of The Tower of Babel that begins with everyone on Earth speaking the same language and able to understand each other. Whether the scattering of people around the world was a punishment for hubris or not, the consequence was that people began speaking different languages and could no longer understand each other.

But what happens when people speaking the same language no longer understand each other because they interpret the meaning of the same words differently? That is the situation we are facing in contemporary American society today.

The second question that must be answered is a matter of interpretation.

What does religion mean to you?

Thomas Jefferson wrote eloquently on the subject in an 1802 letter to the Danbury Baptists who worried about their minority status in Connecticut. Jefferson was reassuring the Baptists that being a minority religion would not be a problem in a Protestant majority state as far as the federal government was concerned.

Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between Man & his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, & not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should “make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof”, thus building a wall of separation between Church & State. Adhering to this expression of the supreme will of the nation in behalf of the rights of conscience, I shall see with sincere satisfaction the progress of those sentiments which tend to restore to man all his natural rights, convinced he has no natural right in opposition to his social duties. (Wikipedia)

Jefferson’s letter clearly indicates that for Jefferson, religion was a matter of Man and God. Jefferson’s interpretation was the widely accepted and understood view of religion in the early 18th century. By the 20th century the U.S. Supreme Court “incorporated” the Establishment Clause and expanded its application from the federal government to the state governments as well.

Practical application

The practical application of the freedom of religion also requires a uniform understanding of the meaning and interpretation of the word religion. The Exercise Clause clarifies the supremacy of Constitutional laws and freedoms over religious laws and freedoms. This is particularly important in contemporary America because we are facing “religious” practices of Islam that threaten our Constitutional freedoms.

The Free Exercise Clause distinguishes between religions beliefs and religious practices. It is the equivalence of distinguishing between thinking and doing. In America an individual is free to think murderous thoughts but he is not free to murder. Islam is a religion governed by religious Sharia Law that endorses honor killings, female genital mutilation, murder of apostates, murder of homosexuals, wife beatings, child marriage and pedophilia. American jurisprudence does not have the will or authority to change people’s beliefs. This applies equally to citizens of the United States, guests in this country, illegal aliens, or citizens of other countries. But we most certainly have the right and legal obligation to disallow any and all practices in conflict with the U.S. Constitution and our cultural norms. Free Exercise Clause (Wikipedia)

“Freedom of religion means freedom to hold an opinion or belief, but not to take action in violation of social duties or subversive to good order.”[28] In Reynolds v. United States (1878), the Supreme Court found that while laws cannot interfere with religious belief and opinions, laws can be made to regulate some religious practices (e.g., human sacrifices, and the Hindu practice of suttee). The Court stated that to rule otherwise, “would be to make the professed doctrines of religious belief superior to the law of the land, and in effect permit every citizen to become a law unto himself. Government would exist only in name under such circumstances.”[29]

Words mean things

In Cantwell v. Connecticut (1940), the Court held that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment applied the Free Exercise Clause to the states. While the right to have religious beliefs is absolute, the freedom to act on such beliefs is not absolute. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/310/296/case.html

In Jefferson’s time as in Truman’s time the meaning of the word religion included items 1 and 2:

1. The belief in and worship of a superhuman controlling power, especially a personal God or gods.
2. A particular system of faith and worship.

Seventy years later in 2017 we must reconsider the meaning of the word religion and ask the question:

What is Islam?

Islam is not a religion like Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism, or Judaism. Instead, Islam is a unified supremacist socio-political system with a military wing and a religious wing. Islam features religious sharia law. The goal of Islam since the 7th century is to make the world Islamic and impose sharia law worldwide.

Islam is tyrannical in its demand for conformity to its barbaric sharia laws. It is also intolerant. Islam is a political force seeking world dominion. So we cannot allow it religious protections like the Baptists in Connecticut during Jefferson’s times.

Islam is far more like the Nazis during Hitler’s time. Consider this question. What if Hitler declared Nazism to be a religion. It certainly qualifies as a religion according to Item 3. A pursuit or interest to which someone ascribes superhuman importance.

Suppose Adolph Hitler declared his Nazism a religion. Then would the left-wing liberal apologists for Islam defend Nazism? Would they defend its determination to rule the world and rid the Earth of every Jew? Would the lefty-wing liberals declare murder of Jews protected by religious freedom? How is this different from allowing Muslims to perpetrate honor killings, female genital mutilation, murder of apostates, murder of homosexuals, wife beatings, child marriage, and pedophilia?

There is no difference.

Apologists for Islamic barbarity claim that Islamists have perverted their religion. If so, it is also true that they have perverted our concept of religious freedom. Islam is not a religion like any other. Moreover its savage practices do not deserve protection under our religious freedom laws and the free exercise clause.

Right for the Wrong Reason Award

The number of 'successful' left-wing and right-wing dictatorships is exactly equal: Zero!

AoT #fundie dailykos.com

Ends don’t justify means.

So you’re opposed to killing someone in self defense? Or is it just when it’s a left wing government that you believe this?
There is some lesson to be learned in the fact that there has been no successful left-wing dictatorship to date.

That’s just false. There’s been as many successful left wing dictatorships as right wing. Americans just mythologize the right wing dictatorships as being “efficient” and “making the trains run on time.” But the USSR was a successful left wing dictatorship.
Really? Now it’s somehow “self defense” for a government to kill its own citizens (so long as the government is “left wing”)?

The point is that the ends do sometimes justify the means, and unless you oppose violence as self defense then you agree with that.
And it starved to death millions of Ukrainians on purpose because they wouldn’t get along with the Party line. Not to mention the other millions murdered in Stalin’s later purges.

Indeed, just like the US genocided Native Americans. In fact, the US is responsible for more death than the USSR. Since we’re talking about ends and means and all. Because right now it sure seems like that’s just a talking point that liberals push to pretend like communism is the greatest evil ever while ignoring everything that capitalism has done and is doing.

Edgar Tru #sexist #fundie #wingnut returnofkings.com

2 SIGNS TO IDENTIFY A LIBERAL IN DISGUISE


What is a liberal? What is a conservative? Many will have different words to describe these terms, and often conflating them with Democrat or Republican.

A conservative does not have to be part of the Republican Party. A conservative does not have to be a wardog. A conservative could be a socialist on a nationalist level. Many have this mainstream idea about what a liberal and conservative are. And many in the political arena fly under the conservative banner when, in reality, they are an adversary to the very foundation of conservatism. Perhaps not today, or next year. But sooner or later, their adherence to liberalism will craft a political and cultural snowball effect which shall be the death of their set society.

So, how does one identify a liberal in disguise, or in denial?

1. They Support Women’s Rights

I hold to the claim that allowing females to vote was a rotten call of judgement by men. And, to this day, there are ‘conservatives’ who support this decision. Personally, I find it anti-conservative and pro-liberal to allow women a vote. That doesn’t equate to hating them but rather recognizing they lack logic which, by their very nature, means they cannot vote in accordance with law and order, safety and security. It isn’t complex; unless, of course, you’re a female in which you may not possess the intellect to grasp the overall societal implications of such a manner.

Women like Ann Coulter or Faith Goldy are rare. A beautiful rarity, I might add. In truth, I’d vote for Faith Goldy for mayor of Toronto. I do not dwell there, but I’d support a female who is anti-immigration and pro-borders. I’d vote for Ann Coulter as US President. They both have more backbone than any contemporary limp-wrist Western man. But, again, they are rarities.

Conservatism has a foundation. It does not stray from tradition. In the Ancient World, men dominated and women submitted, or were put in their place if they were too disobedient. Any man, or woman, who supports women’s right to vote, in terms of political power, is liberal-minded. Beware of those prancing around right-winged circles who still hold to this delusional libertarian-esque mentality. They are not conservative in their hearts of hearts.

2. They Support Libertarianism

I’d be fine living in a libertarian society. How cool would that be? I get to live as I please and, as long as I don’t harm another, I am free to be myself. What a glamorous fantasy!

It is a fantasy. That’s not how the real world operates. If it did, I’d subscribe to that ideology. But human nature shall never allow it. In conveying that, it strikes me liberal as hell the one who dares advocate for such a society. They are not only defying human nature, but they are straying from conservatism by giving far too much freedom, on such an irresponsible level, to the citizens of that set society. Libertarianism, along with communism and anarchy, are all ludicrous because they stand on one similar basis: human beings can get along and play nicely.

Less government is, in my view, not the solution. I do not like it, but my observations direct me this way, in accordance with maintaining law and order. Some claim the solution to the system is… no system? Sorry but that’s childish, stupid and fucking foolish. It’s an immature, irrational worldview based on lunacy.

Imagine this: we’re all standing around and, just to our left, is an open door. Inside are the controls of all of society. The libertarian says we are all going to behave and no one is to enter that door because ‘freedom’ and ‘liberty’ are totally in fashion. Well, human nature will give way and, before the libertarian can finish their line of piffle, someone has already run inside that door, locked it, and is now boss.

Libertarians aren’t really that intelligent.

Beware: Dave Rubin Is A Progressive In Infancy

I personally do not have any qualms with Dave Rubin. He is one of the reasons I’ve found my way to conservatism. He began talking to a variety of different guests which, over time, led me to one character, then another until it networked toward the alternative right (or dissident right), etc. I could most likely get along just fine with the man. But he is liberal. And he is a progressive in infancy.

His ideas, if actually obtained on a societal level, would be fine. Live and let live. It’s a fantasy but, if manifested in reality, would be fine. The conundrum is human nature, along with the political and cultural snowball effect of liberalism and its ideals and political decisions made within a society. After women were allowed to vote, it led, many years later, to females on the frontlines of war weakening what is supposed to be the self-defense tool of a nation. After gay marriage, it shortly thereafter became bigoted to be against children transitioning into the opposite sex. There are political and cultural snowball effects to every decision if it strays from orthodoxy.

So, anyone prancing around as a conservative, and believes women should have the same opportunities as a man, are liberal. And, by extension, a progressive in infancy. They may themselves not turn progressive, but their adherences will trickle down to the latter generations allowing a gateway toward leftism.

People, such as Dave Rubin, are gateways into leftism. Not today, or even next year. But, in time, it will lead toward that direction.

Conclusion

We must have comrades if one desires survival over death. Not everyone who is liberal (in disguise or denial) is your adversary. Not for now, at least. But be aware of their worldview and adherences because, again, there is a very serious thing to understanding human nature and the political and cultural snowball effects of the liberal mindset.

It is not wise to constantly bicker at those who will, if civil unrest breaks out, ultimately land on your side. But, again, understanding the giveaways of the liberal mindset may very well be important in identifying a little problem in the many years to come.

The Individual (a.k.a: Reptilian Dimension) #conspiracy reptiliandimension.wordpress.com

The extreme left communist’s (Jesuit trained) are working with radical Islamists linked to ISIS to shut down Donald Trump rallies

The Jesuit New World Order are using the same tactics all over the world to ensure an Islamic invasion of Europe and the US. The Jesuit’s train extreme left wing communists to aid and abet destructive Islamic immigration into the West, so the Jesuit’s can use Islam to destroy Protestant nations and implement a one world government and religion. When a right wing political candidate or group arises to challenge Islamic immigration or leftist policies, the extreme left rises against them with violence and destruction. These left wing groups are often working with radical Muslim’s with links to ISIS. The recent protests against Donald Trump involved left wing communists who work directly for Bernie Sanders and Hilary Clinton, and it also involved radical Muslim’s who have links to ISIS. This is the political group Donald Trump is essentially fighting against, he is fighting against; Jesuit (Greg Galuzzo)/Saul Alinsky trained communists and radical Muslims who flirt with ISIS. If Bernie Sanders or Hilary Clinton gets elected, America will begin to become radicalized by Islam and the left will collapse its borders even more.

In the UK the extreme left wing and government funded group called UAF (United Against Fascism) attacks anyone who criticizes Islam. The UAF actually gave the Muslim who beheaded a UK soldier (Lee Rigby) on the street a platform to speak on at their protests. These are the same type of left wing Islamic linked groups that are protesting at Donald Trump rallies. Donald Trump was recently attacked by a protester who can be seen on various online videos posing with a machine gun behind an ISIS flag. Donald Trump is America’s last defense against an engineered Islamic invasion, and against the Jesuit Order who are seeking to destroy the country from within by funding and training the extreme left.

The Jesuit Order are an occult Luciferian group who took over the Roman Catholic church centuries ago, and they now use the Vatican and various secret societies, to take over the world and create a one world government and religion. The Jesuit Order are using Islam to destroy Protestant Christian culture in Europe and they plan to do the same in the United States. The Jesuit Order control Islam through the Jesuit controlled Vatican Knights of the Golden Fleece (Saudi Royals are Knights of the Golden Fleece) and various other secret societies. According to former Jesuit of the fourth vow, Alberto Rivera, the Vatican created Islam to destroy Bible based Protestant Christianity in the Middle East. The Jesuit Order seem to be pro Islamic and pro left wing progressive, and they are creating a leftest progressive doctrine within the Vatican to accommodate Islam. The Jesuit Order may create a one world religion which includes radical Islam, so they can use Sharia law to murder anyone who doesn’t submit to their rule. The Jesuit Pope has made various statements over the years which include justifying violence by radical Muslims, and he has also stated that all religions are different paths to God (contrary to the Holy Bible). The Jesuit Order trained President Obama in communist and Islamic tactics through a Jesuit called Greg Galuzzo at the Gamaliel foundation. It is the communists and radical Islamist’s that are now taking over the governments of the world for the Jesuit Order. The Jesuit Order wish to have a communist/Islamic/liberal Vatican one world religion and government under the United Nations. Many radical Islamic leaders are controlled by the Jesuit Order or are Jesuit’s themselves in accordance with the Jesuit oath. The Jesuit oath requires the Jesuit to take over organized religion through infiltration and spying. The Jesuits also control the United Nations through the Knights of Malta who have permanent observer status on the security council.

Jefferson #racist amren.com

European socialism can not work because White socialists all love racial diversity.

The same left wing White socialists in England who were out in the streets celebrating the death of Margaret Thatcher, are the same left wing White socialists who would never in a million years hit the streets of England to protest against the increasing number of Muslim and Black immigrants into their country.

Europeans ONLY hit the streets to protest and celebrate left wing causes like spitting on Margaret Thatcher's grave. Europeans NEVER hit the streets to protest and celebrate right wing causes like demanding that all Muslim South Asians and North Africans be deported from Europe.

That is why I do not feel sorry for the eventual collapse of Europe. I blame Europeans for voting these far left wing politicians into power.

I blame Europeans for not embracing right wing politicians.

I blame Europeans for not embracing the right to own guns in their home. Most European men are a bunch of sissy beta males who are afraid of guns.

America has more gun loving White alpha males than all European countries combined.

James Simpson #fundie rightsidenews.com

Sixty-eight years ago today, Japan launched a surprise attack on Pearl Harbor that brought the United States into World War II. In that historic conflict we defeated Japan and its German Nazi ally four years later at a cost of over 400,000 American lives.

Since before World War II however, we have faced a much more subtle foe - one that in many ways has been more deadly. The foe is an amorphous mass, variably called: "Liberal," "Progressive," "Leftist," "the Left," "the Radical Left," the "New Left," "Communist," "Neo-communist," "Socialist," "Marxist," "Neo-Marxist," even "Marxofascist."

Lest "liberals" take offense at being associated with communists, Marxists and socialists, it can only be said that Lenin referred to them as "useful idiots," i.e. those who knowingly or unknowingly assist communists in achieving communist objectives. For this reason communists share the same contempt for liberals that the rest of us do. We both know they are fools.

So forget liberals. Call the foe the "radical left". It has been the instigator of most of our foreign policy failures, including Vietnam and Korea; failures measured in millions of lives. Practically every public policy failure of the past century, from the healthcare crisis to our addled legal system, from crime-ridden ghettos to failing public schools, can be laid at the feet of the Left.

2016 FSTDT Awards

Nominations

The Nominees #announcement

Nominations closed — thanks to everyone who nominated! Also very special thanks to Pharaoh for keeping the nominations list up-to-date! The first round of voting will be up in the next day or two.
___

This the page for the 2016 FSTDT Awards nominations!

Note: you must be a registered user to make nominations. Nominations from anonymous and unregistered users will be deleted at my discretion. Make sure you're logged in before you make any nominations. If you don't have an account but you want to participate, register here! Don't be shy, because that's me!

In your nomination, try to include a brief explanation of why it is worthy of an award and a few exemplar quotes where applicable. (See my nominations below for an example.) You may make as many nominations for as many awards as you want, and you may nominate as many times as you want (i.e. all your nominations don't have to be in one comment, and I would much prefer you post a new comment than than edit your original comment when adding more nominations). Also feel free to suggest categories and give feedback on how I'm doing and handling the awards this year!

Categories that don't receive much attention will probably be culled from the final vote. The deadline for nominations is December 17.

The nominations will be aggregated and organized on this page to keep from cluttering this one.

And one last (but very important) thing: Please provide either quote URLs or quote #s / IDs where relevant (e.g. fundie-nomination exemplars, quote nominations)!

...and now, ladies and gentlemen, without further ado, the categories are:

Fundie Nominations
• Religious fundie of the year
• Right-wing / conservative fundie of the year
• Left-wing / liberal fundie of the year
• Conspiracy theorist of the year
• Sexist of the year
• Racist of the year
• Single-issue wonk of the year
• Vulture of the year
• Batshit-insane person of the year (generally / overall)

Quote nominations
These are regardless / independent of the fundie who said them, but you can make a double-nomination (i.e. nominate a fundie and nominate one of their quotes for X quote of the year). Quote nominations may be from any section and about anything: religion, politics, conspiracy theories, racism, sexism, etc.

• Funniest quote of the year
• Nightmare fuel quote of the year
• One-liner of the year: Two sentences and 250 characters max, ideally less.
• WTF?! quote of the year: The most bizarre, incomprehensible, or "out there" quote (this would be a prime example if it were from 2016)
• Incel quote of the year: Just since there's been so damn many of them

Board nomination
• Board of the year: may be fundie, racist, conspiracy theory, etc.

Commenter / Submitter nominations
• Best submitter of the year
• Best commenter of the year
• "Best" troll / shitposter of the year

Comment nominations
• Funniest comment of the year
• Best rebuttal of the year

Misc.
• Conspiracy theory of the year: Because this has truly been a banner year for CSTDT...
• False flag of the year: ...mostly because of these
_

17 Dec Update:
Today's the last day to nominate!

With that news out of the way, I'll go into detail about the candidate-selection and voting process. If I make this whole thing sound complicated and confusing, it's not really. It just seems that way because I'm going into a lot of detail. Just go with the flow come voting time and everything will make sense. Since I'm going over the voting process in length here, this'll probably be TL;DR for many (most?) people, so I'll also include the most important information here on the voting pages.

Fundies (religious, left-wing, right-wing, conspiracy theory, sexist, racist, single-issue wonk, vulture, batshit-insane person) must have at least one accompanying example quote to make it to candidates. Fundie nominees that still need quotes after today will be disqualified and removed from the list of candidates.

Quote categories (funniest, nightmare fuel, one-liner, WTF?!, incel) and the remaining categories (board, submitter, commenter, troll, best comment, best rebuttal, conspiracy theory, false flag) must have at least three nominees to make it on the list of categories up for vote. Those with fewer than three will be disqualified. (The same also technically applies for the fundie categories, but they have all surpassed the minimum number of three fundie nominees, rendering the whole rule moot for them.)

Voting for fundies and voting for the remaining categories will be done in two separate posts concurrently. Fundie categories will have four rounds of voting, each lasting a week (give or take a day for preparation), and the remaining categories will have two rounds, each lasting two weeks. That makes the total time for voting about a month (That's also about the same amount of time Distind generally allotted to voting, though he didn't do it in rounds.)

For fundies, the four rounds of voting will be:

First round (December 19–24) – Will select the top 3 exemplar quotes for each fundie. If a fundie already has only two or three exemplar quotes, then they will be exempted from this round and will be up for voting in the next. If a fundie has just one exemplar, then they will be exempted from this round and the next, and they will be up for voting in the third round.

Second round (December 25-31) – Will narrow the exemplar quotes down to one.

Third round (January 1-7) – Will choose the various fundies of the year! Their winning exemplar quotes will be embellished with their awards.

Fourth round (January 8-14) – Will pitch each of the winning fundies against one another to choose the one single darndest, fundiest fundie of the year. Their exemplar quotes will have two awards put on them: the category they won and fundiest fundie of the year.

For the remaining categories, the two rounds of voting will be:

First round (December 18–31): Candidates in each category will be narrowed down to three.

Second round (January 1-14): The three remaining candidates will be narrowed down to one, the winners! Each of the winning quotes will be embellished with their awards. Winners in the other categories will receive a special mention in a Shy Says post because I don't know what else to do. Any suggestions?

As with nominations, users must be registered and logged in to vote. If you don't have an account and wanna vote, go make one and use it! I will be the only one in charge of voting and tallying the votes. Letting more than one person do this is just asking for errors. While I'm busy handling voting, Pharaoh and Ravy will be the ones approving new quotes for the most part. They'll also be doing comment moderation after I have a little chat with them regarding trolls.

Oh, and another thing, when you cast your votes in the comments, each comment will be hidden after I count its vote to keep from losing my place and double-counting. So don't freak out if your vote suddenly disappears. That will actually be a good thing: it means I counted it. :) Hiding the votes will also have the benefit of preventing a bandwagon effect from influencing the vote.

But remember, I'm hiding the comments, not deleting them: if you vote more than once, I'll catch you and ask you to pick a vote to keep and discard the other one(s). If they're for the same candidate, I'll just count them as one. If you repeatedly vote more than once, all of your votes will be discarded and you won't get to participate in any remaining rounds of voting. (Any votes will be ignored if you try.)

Votes will be tallied using a combination of automated SQL queries and manual counting to ensure what the queries return is correct. To make manual counting easier for me, follow the ballot format I give on the voting pages exactly, that way my SQL sorcery will count it correctly with minimal fuss and all I'll have to do is verify it.

Whew. I think that covers everything. If you read it all, thanks for hanging in there with me!

Azril Mohd Amin and Rafidah Hanim Mokhtar #fundie themalaymailonline.com

Let’s be clear. Being leftist does not inoculate you from behaving like a fascist; just as authoritarianism is not the exclusive vice of the right wing. The Nazis, after all, were socialists and lest we forget, Joseph “Dictator” Stalin and Chairman Mao Zedong were communists, while Francisco “Fascist” Franco in Spain was, in fact, a left wing socialist.

The most archetypal examples of totalitarianism in the 20th Century were incarnated by left wing ideologues and simply, using liberal jargon with the aim to appeal to compassion and tolerance in order for you to advance a deeply authoritarian agenda does not make that agenda less offensive.

What makes a movement fascist is the degree, to which it does not accept dissent, its refusal to tolerate other opinions and the outright arrogance in seeking to advance its agenda through force, demonization and denigration of anyone who disagrees with it. And this is quite noticeable among the so-called “progressives;” or what should be more accurately described as the “regressive left.”

The left does not deal magnanimously with anyone who challenges its narratives; in reality, the supporters can be quite malicious.

In Malaysia, human rights NGO, the Centre for Human Rights Research and Advocacy or Centhra, along with a broader coalition of NGOs under the name Macsa (the Malaysian Alliance of Civil Society Organisations in the UPR Process), recently published a statement against the efforts to advance political agenda of the LGBT community in the country against the prevailing sentiments and religious concerns of the general public.

Centhra and Macsa were instantly excoriated online by gay-rights activists and left-wingers as advocates of “selective rights.” Worse off, Centhra and Macsa were brandished as bigots and as religious extremists. Their credentials as human rights defenders were rejected with the allegations that they purportedly did not align with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948 (UDHR) in their opposition to, for instance, same-sex marriage.

LGBT defenders’ political game

To begin with, it should be acknowledged that it is a political ideology to regard homosexuality as an identity akin to race or ethnicity. This is neither an objective nor a scientific fact and for all intents and purposes, it remains merely an opinion.

Another opinion, far closer to objective evidence, is that homosexuality is a chosen behaviour. Therefore, the moment we begin to talk about the “rights” of the LGBT community, we are participating in an ideological discussion.

Declaring that LGBT individuals deserve special rights and protections is based on the concept that homosexuality is an identity, and this should not be accepted as an un-debatable fact. A good deal of the progress in the LGBT agenda has derived from their making this concept unquestionable; even though the actual science on the matter is, at best, inconclusive.

It is an entirely valid viewpoint if you do not subscribe to the idea that there should be special rights afforded to LGBT individuals. This viewpoint does not in any way equate to believing that the general rights afforded to all people do not apply to them.

If you choose to believe that homosexuality is a chosen behaviour, which, in the absence of conclusive scientific evidence to the contrary, is the most reasonable assumption to make; then, like everyone else, LGBT individuals are, and should be, subject to laws that regulate public behaviour.

Furthermore, like everyone else, their choices once made, will tend to limit (or at the very least impact) their subsequent available options.

Take for example the right to contract a marriage. The right to marry is upheld by the UDHR, but it is a right upheld for heterosexual couples exclusively, wherein article 16(1) thereof uses the phrase “men and women of full age.”

There is nothing whatsoever that contradicts the UDHR if one does not believe in the right of same-sex couples to marry. Nor is there anything inaccurate about describing the push for gay-rights and same-sex marriage as essentially a political agenda, rather than a human rights concern.

If one chooses to exclusively partner with members of one’s own sex, one has implicitly chosen to not marry and to not procreate. It is made with a conscious decision to choose. These are at least two of the obvious ramifications of that choice, and avoiding the consequences of one’s decisions is not a human right.

One cannot invoke their right to food, for example, when they have chosen to spend their income on other things.

Pushing political agenda in the name of human rights

The regressive left are manipulators of the UDHR, not defenders of it. They are not human rights campaigners; they are political extortionists who couch their demands in the language of human rights.

The preamble of the UDHR states that “a common understanding of these rights and freedoms is of the greatest importance for the full realisation of this pledge,” yet the leftists want to reinterpret the terms of the contract which the UDHR represents after it has been signed; and by this new interpretation, they intend to include things to which the signatories have not agreed; and they call this “defending” the UDHR!

The UDHR provides no special recognition of homosexuality as an identity deserving specific rights or protections; it only states that the general rights outlined in the declaration cannot be denied to any individual on the basis of his or her sex.

That is what the signatories have agreed to; nothing more and nothing less of this. And the term “sex” used herein refers to the biological anatomy of an individual, as opposed to the term “gender” which may refer to the social role based on the sex of the person.

Pushing the political agenda of recognisng homosexuality as an identity rather than a chosen behaviour, has no basis in the UDHR, and opposing that agenda is in no way conflicting with the rights enshrined in it. Every nation is free to legislate behaviour according to their own standards of morality and justice and logic.

The UDHR has always respected each member state’s rights to establish its own human rights laws within the ambit of its national narratives.

One must ask, why are the leftists in Malaysia holding other fellow citizens in such contempt that they believe they are incapable of determining for themselves what is best for our society? Why do they presume, when the people of Malaysia disapprove of homosexuality, and resist the same-sex political project, that they are all religious extremists and ignorant bigots; all the while it is the leftists who are seeking to force average Malaysians to follow their unpopular political opinions?

In short, why are they so fundamentally undemocratic in their pursuit of their “human rights” agenda?

Glenn Christopherson #fundie facebook.com

For the apologists of Islamic Jihadists. A little history lesson to keep in mind when next you wish to point out the problems within Christianity as an illustration of other "bad" religions.

Hitler was NOT a Christian. He was affiliated with Romanism but loved pagan religion especially the Thule society. And he was a left wing socialist, not the prime example of "right wing extremism"

The Oklahoma bomber was NOT a Christian. He was a left wing progressive who hated the Bible.

Jim Jones was a minister in a left wing denomination but was NOT a Christian but rather a Bible hating social justice advocate.

The Crusades were NOT an example of aggressive and violent Christianity but were one false religion (Roman Catholicism) at war with another false religion (Islam).

Hope that helps

BobbyXD9 #fundie youtube.com

Most left-wing racists are too stupid to know that membership in the Democrat Party was a requirement to join their Klan. ALL slave owners were Democrats in the beginning as they are today. The haters on the left just accuse patriotic Americans of the biases, hatreds, fear & self loathing that they themselves feel. It takes a? fascist left winger to hate America & Americans so much. Like their mideast terrorist counterparts, liberals want patriotic Americans & our Constitution dead & gone.

State of the Nation #conspiracy stateofthenation2012.com

The agenda is a complex and convoluted one. The primary purpose of the California strategy is to use the engineered drought as a means to impose an unlawful geoengineering program … as a ‘remedy’ to this and all future droughts and deluges. There is now no question that the drought was purposefully geoengineered over the course of Jerry Brown’s most recent tenure as governor. He has never once publicly addressed the persistent chemtrails which have been sprayed incessantly over the past five years.

Governor Brown Has Repeatedly Received Scientific Evidence Indicating That The Drought Was Purposefully And Meticulously Geoengineered

And yet in spite of this indisputable evidence, he has never responded to those parties who have provided the volumes of scientific research showing how it was geoengineered. The soil samples alone have revealed shocking levels of aluminum, barium and strontium. Each of these chemical elements just happens to be the major components of the standard chemtrail mix which is sprayed daily across the skies of America.

Of course, the resulting chemclouds then rain these noxious chemical agents on the land and water below. Over years of chemtrailing these and other toxic chemical compounds begin to bioaccumulate in the vegetation and animals on land, as well as in the marine animals and plants in the water bodies. Whole forests in northern California are now rapidly disappearing as both heat stress and lack of water conspire with these chemical contaminations to systematically weaken the trees. Then various types of pestilence and other infestations eventually kill off square miles of once healthy trees.

Governor Brown is fully aware of this devolving situation and has done nothing to address it. The chemtrailing continues as before despite so many bringing it to his attention. In many locations the chemtrailing operations appear to have been considerably ramped up to an alarming level of intensity. And still the Governor’s office has no response to those who have alerted him to the regularly chemtrailed skies and worsening emergencies across the state (e.g. wildfires in the form of forest fires, brush fires, grass fires; mudslides and flash floods; tree blight and plant pestilence; forest collapse; agricultural contraction; reservoir water loss, evaporating lakes and ponds, etc.).

Governor Brown Has Witnessed The Same Chemtrails As Everyone Else —
Why has he steadfastly refused to acknowledge them?

Governor Brown goes back and forth to work everyday just like every other Californian. He sees perfectly clear days turn into cloudy ones in a matter of minutes. Within just an hour of intensive chemtrail spraying, which sometimes weaves an unmistakable tic-tac-toe board across the sky, chemclouds stretch across the previously blue sky, from horizon to horizon.

Because of this geoengineering phenomenon, the weather forecasters around the state have been made to look like total incompetents, as are the meteorologists in every state nowadays. How does a state government properly function in a state where the weather is now completely unpredictable, except for those who really do control the weather? Does the governor even consult with his chosen meteorologists during the ever-occurring disastrous weather events? Does he ever convene his panel of climate experts to discuss the reasons for the new climatological trends criss-crossing the state?

Just as the current covert and illicit geoengineering regime in California has exposed Governor Brown to be either another willfully negligent political operative who cares not a whit for the state or its residents. Or, he is prominently configured within a pivotal scheme to use California as an example for every other state, should they fail to succumb to the coming ‘legalized’ regime of geoengineering.

California does appear to be primary cog in the global machinery that was engineered to implement a New World Order to be administered by a One World Government that will be initially established to ‘fix’ global climate change. The following article well explains both the plot and purpose behind this highly ambitious and fatally flawed scheme.

It’s no accident that Jerry Brown’s tenure as governor has perfectly paralleled Barack Obama’s. Both politicos have had carefully managed political images that would be used to corral the entire spectrum of Democratic and left-wing, liberal and progressive voters into a pen of blind acceptance and uncharacteristic compliance. In this fashion a big chunk of the electorate has been used to manufacture consent around some of the most weighty issues that are preparing the way for this newly emerging and highly oppressive carbon management regime.

Faith and Freedom Coalition #fundie motherjones.com

[Some highlights from a F&FC voter registration survey]

Question #1: How do you rate Barack Obama's overall performance as President so far?

()Excellent ()Good ()Fair
()Poor ()Abysmal ()Undecided
()I consider him an enemy of liberty and the values that built our great nation.

Question #9: What do you think is President Obama's true political ideology?
()Mostly Conservative ()Moderate ()Mostly Liberal
()Far-Left ()Socialist ()Communist
()Fascist ()Not Sure
()Other_____________________________

Question #10:How much danger do you think liberty is in right now as a result of President Obama's policies, actions and agenda for America's future? (Mark as many answers as you think appropriate.)
()More serious than the threats we faced in World War II from Nazi Germany and the Japanese because the attack on liberty today is from our own government.
()More serious than the threat we faced from the Soviet Union during the Cold War.
()More serious than the American Civil War.
()All of the above.
()Serious, but not as serious as the threats to liberty listed above.
()President Obama is not a threat to liberty.
()Undecided ()Other_________________________

James Adkisson #fundie crooksandliars.com

(Three choice quotes from church-shooter James Adkisson's manifesto)

Know this if nothing else: This was a hate crime. I hate the damn left-wing liberals. There is a vast left-wing conspiracy in this country & these liberals are working together to attack every decent & honorable institution in the nation, trying to turn this country into a communist state. Shame on them....

...

"This was a symbolic killing. Who I wanted to kill was every Democrat in the Senate & House, the 100 people in Bernard Goldberg's book. I'd like to kill everyone in the mainstream media. But I know those people were inaccessible to me. I couldn't get to the generals & high ranking officers of the Marxist movement so I went after the foot soldiers, the chickenshit liberals that vote in these traitorous people. Someone had to get the ball rolling. I volunteered. I hope others do the same. It's the only way we can rid America of this cancerous pestilence."

...

"I thought I'd do something good for this Country Kill Democrats til the cops kill me....Liberals are a pest like termites. Millions of them Each little bite contributes to the downfall of this great nation. The only way we can rid ourselves of this evil is to kill them in the streets. Kill them where they gather. I'd like to encourage other like minded people to do what I've done. If life aint worth living anymore don't just kill yourself. do something for your Country before you go. Go Kill Liberals.

reptiliannogmar #conspiracy abovetopsecret.com

So in a thread here in The Political Madness page I had someone question my right to be an American since I am a sovereign citizen. He for some reason thinks that I am denied my American Pride when I became a Sovereign Citizen. When in fact I believe I have embraced it. I have shut out public civil and government authority and embraced The Constitution and my Amendment Rights in a way I never could have done as an American Citizen. Yet I believe vice versa. I believe that I would not have the freedoms I have today had I not denounced my American citizenship. I believe that according to the constitution and Amendment rights that I am more American now that ever before.

You decide. I no longer live by public local state or government laws. But English Common Law.

The American way is believing in The Constitution, you Amendment rights, hope peace and happiness. You can believe in something with out it actually working. Well since I became a Sovereign Citizen these documents finally work for me.

So what does being a Sovereign Citizen actually entail...

I do not pay any taxes what so ever since I am a sovereign citizen.

But that does not mean I does not have American pride. It just means that I protect myself from the corrupt American Government the best I can.

I protect myself from The bankers stealing my money.

It means I dont have to pay traffic tickets or be documented as a cocky mamy bull# licensed driver.

It means that you cant sue me, the government cant sue me.

It means that THE BANKERS AND TPTB HAVE PAYED OFF MY DEBTS by means of debt bonds.

It means that I can walk into any bank I want and ask for these bonds and refusal means that that bank would have do deal with stacks of paperwork and the American court system.

It means that no one man or court can decide my fate.

It also means that I am part of an "extremist anti-government group" according to the FBI. Which I am perfectly happy with as long as I AM A FREE MAN.

It means that I can smoke my mary jane and big brother cant do # about it.

It means that I can grow my mary jane and big brother cant do # about it.

It means that I have disconnected myself from the public civil government and bull# reaches of the TPTB.

It means although I still pay, that I dont have to pay my mortgage and no body can do # about it.

And I am surprised that all ATS members have not done this.

It means that I truly I have my civil liberties I have my civil rights given to me by my birth as a human not as an American.

IT MEANS THAT I AM A REAL AMERICAN AND HAVE THE RIGHTS OF LIFE AND LIBERTY FREEDOM HAPPINESS AND THE TRUE AMERICAN WAY AS IT IS DESCRIBED IN THE CONSTITUTION AND THE AMERICAN AMENDMENT RIGHTS THAT WERE GIVEN TO ME AS A BIRTH RIGHT. Even if I am no longer an American citizen I am more free than probably everyone on this damn site.

iT MEANS THAT YOU DONT AND THAT YOU ARE NO AMERICAN CITIZEN BUT RATHER AND AMERICAN CAPTIVE.

Nuff said... DONE.

Get a lawer

get a loan to pay that lawer

Then become a sovereign citizen

Become an independent

Be free of the corrupt American government.

Be prosperous happy and truly embrace The Constitution and Amendment rights by reject the American Government out of your life.

"James" and his various sockpuppets #fundie mediamatters.org

So disgusting "James" was back on MMfA. Here're today's gems of wingnuttery.

• a few seconds ago

Obama niggér B747 • a minute ago

Your kind wishes GOP shot & killed.

Phil Montag, democrat was happy Majority Whip Steve Scalise was shot at a congressional baseball game practice and wished the Louisiana Republican was dead. How many of your kind celebrated with him?

Avatar
Obama niggér Indy • in a few seconds

What, still not good enough. Keep in mind, 90% of the time here is disrespecting his Eminence Trump.

Look at it in one of 2 ways.

Folks do it, coz they want it back

or

Since they do it, it must be ok.

Obama niggér B747 • a few seconds ago

I hate everyone.

Why do your kind hate gays?

bama niggér waggs03 • a few seconds ago

Because you suck trånny nigger cøck, thats why

•
Reply
•
Share ›

-
Avatar
Obama niggér Obama niggér • in a few seconds

LOL

Obama niggér StratRat • a few seconds ago

Do you suck off that cat?

Obama niggér • a minute ago

< < Michelle Obama

Michelle, please plow me in the ass with your ebola ridden trånny niggér cøck.

- Obama -

Obama niggér dld • a few seconds ago

So no real reason, except for your filthy degenerate diseased depraved sense of pig liberal logic

Obama niggér • in a few seconds

MMMM, liberals, who wants me to puke in your ass?

Afterwards I will ass fuck you.

Obama niggér GOPvsUSA3 • a few seconds ago

He had aids, was a liberal, had a trånny niggér fake cøck hanging out of his ass


Avatar
Red Rose • 3 minutes ago

03272017: Three Oklahoma kids, future liberals, thinking other folks property belongs to them, killed with an AR15.

Gotta love this. And we got away with killing your kind, AGAIN!

Red Rose BigBearcatBill • 10 minutes ago

Funny your kind think Bill is clean since he shoved cigars up a lil girl.

Your kind

Captain Freedom • 12 minutes ago

Liberals are OK with OJ Simpson being released into the public, after he has proven to not be reformed or repentant, by stealing cookies in prison and smirking about it

Red Rose solon • 17 minutes ago

You are nothing but a whiny cum laden queer.

Red Rose Finnibar87 • 17 minutes ago

And our dogs got blow jobs from you


Red Rose • 4 minutes ago

California liberal, Matthew Warner, convicted of fucking then murdering his 3 week year
old daughter. Just as the filthy degenerate depraved diseased pig liberals blame an entire state on the actions of one, the same must be done here. Maybe Matthew wanted the baby aborted, decided the baby needed raped, couldn’t wait for an illegal to do, so he did it.

Liberals, anything degenerate will do.

Red Rose • 7 minutes ago

TREASONUS LIBERALS BLOCKING TRAFFIC THREATENING CORRECT THINKING AMERICANS. CORRECT THINKERS RUN OVER DISEASED LIBERALS. NO CHARGES FILED AGAINST THE CORRECT THINKERS.

Red Rose • a minute ago

Nemias Garcia-Velasco, illegal alien, deported 7 times, drunk driving, kills father of three.

Thank you liberals for giving aid & comfort to illegal’s in sanctuary cities.

Liberals, anything degenerate will do.

ed Rose TMax01 • 9 minutes ago

So you suck cøck on school play grounds?

Red Rose JimWolf359 • a few seconds ago

Democrat State Senator Kevin de Leon calls democrats morally repugnant.

Democrat congress woman Corrine Brown faces fraud charges which could land her in prison for 300 years. Out of $800,000.00 she collected for its charity, only $2,400.00 was spent on charities. The rest she spent on its own filthy degenerate depraved disgusting pig liberal self.

Liberals, anything degenerate will do.

Red Rose • a few seconds ago

Dan Grilo, worked for both Hillary & Obama attacks Carryn Owens, widower of slain seal
William Ryan Owens, calling her an idiot. Your typical filthy degenerate depraved diseased disgusting mentally ill pig liberal.

Red Rose • 2 minutes ago

Rachel Anne Dolezal, a filthy degenerate depraved diseased pig liberal to pretended to be black to get a job at the NACCP, has changed its name to Amare Nkechi Diallo. Which means filthy degenerate trånny nigger in African.

What is wrong with filthy degenerate liberals these days?

Red Rose • a few seconds ago

Baltimore liberal Judge Nicole Taylor releases 18 year old man, after being arrested three times since January 1st for gun & drugs charges. This filthy liberal places no value on American lives as do the rest of liberals dont. It placed restrictions on this 18 year old male nigger, like 1am curfew, etc, etc, but did not think of protecting its fellow Americans from this thug. A day after this nigger was released it was running away from cops with a gun and in his hand. Justifiably the cop shot this thug three times dispatching him into the lap of God. What is wrong with filthy liberals, they give aid & comfort to illegal’s who kill their fellow Americans, now they are releasing thugs from jail to give them another
chance to kill us.

Red Rose • a minute ago

Nancy Piglosi & Elijah Cum in my ear, going on about scapegoat. Piglosi, “Do you know what a scapegoat is? It’s a goat, that we filthy liberals & fucked in the ass Democrats, cum & shit on, and fuck in the asshøle. Then we grease ourselves up, smear lipstick
on our åsses, and chase it down. And at the stroke of midnight, we eat it, while fisting ourselves.

Later, they apologized for letting out trade secrets.

Brennin #fundie christianforums.com

['While liberals advocated for the end of slavery...conservatives resisted
While liberals advocated for the end of segregation conservatives resisted
While liberals advocated for women's rights...conservatives resisted
When liberals advocated for civil rights...conservatives resisted']

John Jay-not a liberal

Alexander Hamilton-not a liberal

John Rankin-not a liberal

Henry Ward Beecher-not a liberal

Lincoln-not a liberal

Teddy Roosevelt-not a liberal

Folks should not get their history from the West Wing.

Joshua Bonehill #fundie nationalistresistance.com

1) A Bonehillist will not defend himself to the Left-Wing or anybody for that fact under Any circumstance. All bonehillists are morally superior and righteous in their argument so therefore there is no need to defend yourself when you encounter an attack – go on the offence instead.

2) As a Bonehillist, it is your duty to protect the British public from the lie that is political correctness. When you encounter PC criminality you should do your best to expose it and attack the source to stop the pollution.

3) Metrosexualism is strictly forbidden for all males who identify with Bonehillism. We recognise that Metrosexualism is a perverse tactic used by the Left-wing to feminise masculinity and We believe that men should be men.

4) As a Bonehillist, you will always be required to help your fellow countrymen In times of need. We believe in social nationalism and want to create a society where neighbours help each other and our society pulls together in order to repair society. You will help your neighbour and do your best for your people.

5) Shopping at massive corporate owned American superstores is strictly forbidden, we support the smaller man and encourage all bonehillists to shop locally in small independent stores. Support the green grocer, the butcher and the local corner store. The only supermarket permitted for use by bonehillists is Waitrose because they are owned by the employees who benefit from the business In a fair and equal way.

6) All Bonehillists must maintain a degree of personal hygiene. We are not like the Left-Wing who refuse to wash so therefore we will be clean, free and fresh in appearance. Short cropped hair is advised for males but not mandatory.

7) Bonehillists will only buy British, buying something that has been made in another country is supporting their economy and that could be seen as treachery. Grow your own produce and double check the products you’re buying to ensure that they have been made in this country.

8) baggy or loose clothing is strictly forbidden. As touched on with rule number 6, Bonehillists are smart and clean in appearance. All items of ‘Chav’ clothing should be disposed of before you even consider becoming a Bonehillist.

9) Bonehillists do not cheat on their partners, they are loyal and respective of their relationships.

10) A Bonehillist will always help his fellow Bonehillist first over all other people. If a ‘comrade’ is in need of help then you will always help him first.

11) After speaking to a fellow Bonehillist it is courteous to say “Bonehill Be With you” and he will respond “And with you”. This is done as a degree of respect to the Founder and acknowledgement of ones position within Bonehillism.

12) Bonehillists will respect the law of the land, if they fall foul of it and suspect they have been wrongly accused then it will be fought out in the court of law with full Bonehillist support.

13) Bonehillists will fly both the Union Jack and St George’s cross flags from their home. This can either be done by hanging the flag from a window outside or by suspending the flag by flag pole in the garden.

14) Bonehillists are not permitted to be a member of any Unions as they are evil perverse Left-Wing traps.

15) Bonehillists will not legitimise the Left-Wing, under no circumstance is conversation between a leftist renegade and a Bonehillist permitted. The left-wing only vent poison and lies, do not corrupt your mind with the filth – ignore them instead.

16) Bonehillists must address the founder himself as “The Founder” or “Leader”, again this is done as a mark of respect towards the divine providence of the founder who rules over Bonehillism with an iron fist.

17) Mega Morbid obesity is not permitted within Bonehillism, a Bonehillist must maintain a healthy body and reject fast food. Obesity is a disease created by the Left-Wing to kill off the British people.

18) A Woman must never question the authority of a man. A Bonehillist male is viewed as the “Pack Leader” and main bread winner of the household. The male will offer protection and a roof for the female and maintain household authority whilst the woman will engage in feminine activity that doesn’t overtake the mans standing within the household.

19) The music of Billy Bragg is strictly forbidden to the ears of all Bonehillists.

20) Bonehillists must never question the authority of the founder. The Founder himself has a Job to do and is always right in all of his decisions. There is only one leader of Bonehillism and that is Joshua Bonehill.

Kaykay #fundie answers.yahoo.com

Why do so many people fall for the "Palestinian" facade?

FUN FACT: There is no such thing as a "Palestinian". "Palestinians" didn't start calling themselves "Palestinians" until the early sixties. They're ancestors were planted there as a part of an old Islamic conspiracy to take over the world. After the Jews left the "Palestinians" came and started calling themselves "native" there (Despite what the liberal media say, the "Palestinians" are the land thieves, not the Jews).
Also don't give me that myth about how Jews and Muslims lived in peace until Israel was formed (and made the Levant a civilized country). The Jews were the "Palestinians'" dhimmis. That is not "living in peace".
Of course the "Palestinians" eventually started painting themselves as victims and Europe took the bait hook line and sinker. The EU agreed to turn their back's on Israel and accept Muslim immigrants in exchange for oil. Now look at Europe. A lot of Europeans admire left-wing dictators like Stalin, Hitler(He was left-wing. Left-wing is big government and right-wing is small government) and Mao. A lot of Europeans are openly anti-semitic and beat up Jews and accept Islam. Liberalism will be the death of Europe. It won't be long before Europe collapses under the Muslim hordes and becomes "Eurabia". In case you don't believe me read "While Europe Slept".
No one should feel sympathy for the "Palestinian" invaders. They teach their children to be anti-semitic and hate Israel and Jews. Why are libs gullible enough to believe this?

FreeConservatives.com #fundie freeconservatives.com

Editors note: By request, FreeConservatives.com has been nominated as FSTDT's Outstanding Fundie Site of the Month!


FC completely swept the competition in all categories, excelling especially in the Intellectual Sterility relay race, the Egregious Racism decathlon, and finally everyone's favorite event the Sanctimonious Prick endurance competition.

Editors pick of favorite posts:
- Medved on evils of waiting until you're over 25 to have children

- Venus de Smilo on cleansing the gene pool of black people

- DoctorDoom on non-Cauc nutcases

- Beowulf on the Right to Life for American flags

- BarryG on the need for a total genocide of Muslim men, women, and children

Whether you're a left-wing liberal douche, or a right-wing conservative asshole, or a pansy libertarian, you just have to admit: these people are sick fucks.

Way to go, FC, you earned it! ;)

NeptunesSon #fundie answers.yahoo.com

Is Hillary Clinton against homeschooling ?

Answer: Against. 100%!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

She is a pure unadulterated Far Left Liberal Secular Progressive that want's Secular Progressive values inculcated into kids as early as possible!

And public schools have become the platform for promoting "Homosexuality", the use of Condoms encouraging sex at an early age, and Lesbianism as a normal healthy lifestyle i.e. in some Second Grade Readers discovered being used in California there are stories like, "Billy has two Mommies" and "Tommy has has two Dads"!

Home-schooling for the Far Left Wing ACLU Adoring Ultra Liberals is a ... NO NO !!

They are against Family values and are out to promote pure secularism and remove any vestiges of traditionalism from America, from saying "Merry Christmas" to "One Nation Under God".

Hillarty Clinton is an avowed Secular Progessive and champion of the Far Left .. and the "Closet Muslim" Osama Obama is even further Left of Hillary !!!

You need to read "Culture Warrior", there's the proof and the answer to your question in "Spades"!

Good luck!
Source(s):
Culture Warrior
Bill O'Reilly

Glock29 #fundie theblaze.com

The conservative base is here like we always have been, but the Republican party has swung so far left that only very few of them are trustworthy conservatives. The GOP has been so worried about getting more left wing radical progressives to vote for them they themselves have become the far left radical progressives and are too stupid to even realize what they stand for now. The liberal progressives have guided them down this path leading them by the nose hoping to split the party (divide and conquer) only the GOP has gone so far left now that very few Republicans will vote for ANY of the GOP now.

The only way the GOP will get it is another big purge next several elections!

I will never give up my firearms nor will my family!

Matt Forney #fundie returnofkings.com

Last week, the mainstream conservative press went apoplectic with rage at the epithet “cuckservative,” a popular insult in alternative right and neoreactionary circles. For the uninitiated, cuckservatives are right-wing politicians and pundits who make a big show of defending traditional values, yet when push comes to shove, they roll over for the left on every issue out of fear of being called “racist,” “sexist” or “homophobic.”

Conservatives like Red State’s Erick Erickson who throw tantrums over the term “cuckservative” are doing so because the term describes them perfectly. If you’re wondering whether you might be a cuckservative, Return of Kings has put together this handy guide to show you. Read on and discover if you’re the kind of conservative who enjoys watching your nation get brutally gang-raped by cultural Marxists…

...

4. You think the reason Detroit and other major U.S. cities are falling apart is because of unions

Cuckservatives are so desperate to avoid being called “racist” that they completely deny the role of race in American society. For example, National Review’s Kevin Williamson absurdly blames the dysfunction of Detroit on unions run amok and not the fact that the city is more than 80 percent black. While socialist policies will eventually ruin a nation, white liberal areas such as Vermont and Oregon have considerably higher standards of living than black areas with the same politics.

...

6. You support corporations, despite their advocacy for leftist causes

Cuckservatives are vociferously opposed to any government action that limits the power of corporations, from higher taxes to environmental regulations to minimum wage increases. These corporations have rewarded cuckservatives by eagerly shoving left-wing degeneracy down Americans’ throats. Not only does Hollywood and other popular media glorify homosexuality, transsexuality and other perversions, most corporations enforce leftist orthodoxy, contrary to the left’s claim that big business is pro-Republican.

For example, following the Supreme Court’s decision legalizing gay marriage, a whole host of corporations, from Google to Facebook, suddenly put up rainbow flag logos in solidarity with the LGBT movement. Here in Chicago, Allstate currently has posters plastered all over the L featuring two men holding hands. Just a few days ago, the WWE acceded to left-wing hysteria about “racism” by firing Hulk Hogan solely because he used a racial slur in a private conversation nearly a decade ago.

Even supposedly right-wing corporate figures are further to the left than the average American. For instance, the Koch brothers, favorite boogeymen of the left, are in favor of open borders. Yet despite being turkey-slapped repeatedly by their corporate masters, cuckservatives are all too happy to spread their cheeks for these multinational purveyors of leftist degeneracy.

...

Unfortunately for cuckservatives, their reign of squeezing their clammy mitts around conservatism’s balls is coming to an end. The sudden popularity of the “cuckservative” epithet shows that grassroots right-wingers are tired of the movement’s spinelessness and groveling to the left. With Donald Trump on the rise and cuckservatives on the run, reversing America’s decline has never looked more possible.

Dan Schneider #fundie rightwingwatch.org

This morning, Dan Schneider of the American Conservative Union, which organizes CPAC, delivered a speech titled “The Alt Right Ain’t Right at All” in which he tried to claim that the Alt-Right has no place within the conservative movement because the term “Alt-Right” has been hijacked by “a hate-filled left wing fascist group” for the purpose of confusing people about what conservatism really represents.

“They stole the term specifically to confuse us,” Schneider stated. “They are anti-Semites, they are racists, they are sexists, they hate the Constitution, they hate free markets, they hate pluralism, they despise everything we believe in. They are not an extension of conservatism … They are nothing but garden variety left-wing fascists.”

mesoness #fundie washingtonpost.com

Mussolini's fascist regime was praised by progressives (you know, the left). Hitler's regime was the National *Socialist* party, and in fact was quite socialist.

Fascism is a left wing idea - it is all about the government making the economy work well through micromanagement. Of course, to do that, it needs strong leaders, and the result was Mussolini. Hitler was an admirer of Mussolini and copied his ideas.

Brett Stevens #fundie amerika.org

As democracy winds down in the West, many of us are facing an ugly truth that first reared its head in the 1800s: that democracy itself impedes conservatism.

Mainstream conservatives will not publicly approach this realization, but the core tenet of democracy is leadership by desire, not by reality. People vote for what they wish were true.

While the ashes cool in Baltimore and the latest news frenzy keeps us distracted so we can avoid noticing the systemic problems of Western civilization, many are wondering how the situation got so bad without anyone figuring it out.

The answer is simple: we voted for it.

By “we” I mean the largest plurality which could work itself into a frenzy over an issue. This is how democracy works: the simplest and most emotional concept unites a mob, they rage and expound and demand it, and then it gets passed. Everyone assumes the situation is decided and moves on.

In any sane democracy, every single law would be voted on every year with a simple question: Is this law achieving its aims?

When you speak to the average voter, it becomes clear that they focus on anything but this question. They talk about moral categories, such as how well-intentioned the law is, or how essential it is, or how it cannot be changed because people depend on it. Never do they look at it as a cause-effect principle that intends to achieve a goal.

The conservatives you see on the television earned the name “the stupid party” because their ideas are fundamentally paradoxical. They want a reality/accountability/responsibility-based (consequentialist) society with a transcendent focus, since if you understand reality, you have no need for the emotional distractions of ideology and go right to the need for meaning. The voters do not want this because distraction is always simpler and more emotionally comforting.

The situation can be revealed in this comical law of politics from Robert Conquest:

2. Any organization not explicitly right-wing sooner or later becomes left-wing.

This law succumbs to an easy attack, called (sensibly) “entryism” by neoreactionaries, which is that it is easy to dress up a liberal idea as a conservative one and declare it explicitly right-wing, then use it to subvert the rest of a right-wing movement.

The left wing will forever be more popular because it offers ideas that are easier to understand, since they require no knowledge of reality and its workings, and more emotionally satisfying, since they are both distraction and “social,” or consist of gift-giving to those who identify with victimhood. Every person in their under-confident, weak and uncontrolled moments succumbs to self-pity and in remembering those, they yield to this force.

Friedrich Nietzsche wrote about this process because he saw it first-hand. In the 1800s, he drove an ambulance in one of the early wars of the forces of democracy versus the rest of us. In it, he saw the process: liberalism appeals to the best of us first because they are reacting emotionally to problems in our society, and only later do they recognize it for what it is, which is a cynical power grab by those least competent to rule.

Conservatives have balked at this dividing line so far. They hope to ride the train of liberal popularity by endorsing the great illusion that desire can decide our problems. They also fear alienating the Christian segment of the right which sees Nietzsche as an atheist and blasphemer, since they have confused the name of what is holy with what is actually holy.

Like other dividing lines — nationalism, rejection of all socialism and need for social hierarchy — this decision separates the men from the boys. Boys still want to please their mother and their friends, maybe hope one of the girls in the class will let them kiss her if they do what she wants. Men realize that original sin was correct, and that without the intervention of discipline and focus the human being is nothing more than a monkey which can talk.

As mainstream conservatism is forced to confront issues like the ongoing failure of diversity, the corruption rising from the liberal state and its institutions, and the accelerating decline of Western Civilization, more conservatives will join the “underground” fringe of conservatism and take the path that Nietzsche did. Until that point, nothing said by conservatives in public will make any sense.

State of the Nation #conspiracy stateofthenation2012.com

The timing of the Florida high school shooting is too perfect not to be a false flag operation executed to deflect attention away from the Democrat’s unprecedented spate of serious scandals. It was also designed to take away the guns — THIS YEAR — which the DEMs cannot do fast enough. They know that at least half of the U.S. citizenry is onto their stealthy and surreptitious Purple Revolution. And they can see the “torches and pitchforks” (and guns) slowly approaching their sanctuary cities.

BEWARE: The Purple Revolution Comes To America

As long as the patriots and conservative side of the body politic (i.e. the Right) are fully armed as many are, the Democrats really do have a LOT to worry about. Hence, their concerns are not unfounded. The serial lawbreakers — from the Obamas and Clintons on down — really do face existential threats. The truth movement not only wants to “lock her up”, they want gallows for the whole lot of them.

Gun Control via Shock and Awe
Ever since Obama first took office there has been a steady stream of mass shootings right up to this very day. In this manner, the behind-the-scenes perpetrators are constantly applying the “Chinese water torture” to the American consciousness. With each successive school shooting, more parents are fearful about the plight of their children. After all, you never know when and where the government’s next mind-controlled terrorist(s) will strike.

The globalists believe that it’s only a matter of WHEN a critical mass of citizens will rise up and demand the outlawing, and subsequent confiscation, of guns. Any populace, no matter how aware they are of the true back story, would likely give into this tactic. However, with the Internet running at full tilt 24/7, the ruling elites greatly underestimate the resolve of the patriot movement.

Yes, it’s quite evident that the liberal side of the political equation can be quite easily manipulated by this incessant fear-mongering. As a matter of historical fact, the liberal, progressive, and left-wing members of the Democratic Party have been [FASTIDIOUSLY] socially engineered to give up their guns and take them away from everyone else. These hard-core Cultural Marxists will not rest until this objective is accomplished for their Bolshevik masters.

However, the faithful Christians and conservatives, freedom-loving Libertarians and Tea partiers, no-nonsense Republicans and constitutionalists, etc. are an altogether different matter. The NRA members, veterans, hunters, militiamen, police and other gun owners are particularly determined not to be disarmed. And their numbers are growing by the day. Therefore, the more TPTB resort to “shock and awe” via domestic terrorism, the more these horrific shootings will come back to bite the CIA-directed and FBI-protected co-conspirators.

Ken Livingstone #moonbat venezuelasolidarity.co.uk

[From "Remembering Hugo Chavez"]

YOU won’t read about it much in those parts of the media currently arguing for war on Venezuela, but when Hugo Chavez first became president in 1999, Venezuela had endured a wave of economic and social catastrophes in the preceding two decades.

Up to seven in 10 people had been left in poverty. Income per head had collapsed to the levels of the 1950s. Millions were left to live in barrios dangerously clinging to the mountainsides, often without clean water or sanitation. Many had no proper access to healthcare and education

After Chavez’s election in 1998 with a 57 per cent vote, he set about his mission to transform the country.

Two key pillars of progressive change in Venezuela were transformations in healthcare and education, funded by a massive programme of wealth redistribution that redirected Venezuela’s oil revenues to collective social purposes.

Under Chavez, the government built thousands of new clinics, hospitals, and diagnostic centres across the country.

Through Mission Barrio Adentro (Into the Neighbourhood Mission), the main healthcare programme established in 2003, care and treatment were provided free. In Chavez’s lifetime it saved as many as 292,000 lives, cut infant mortality by a third and increased life expectancy by over two years. Mission Sonrisa (Mission Smile) provided free dental care, while Mission Milagro (Mission Miracle) restored eyesight to about 300,000 Venezuelans.

In education, tackling illiteracy was an early priority. In just 18 months, 1.6 million adults learned to read and write, two thirds of whom were women. Beyond meeting this basic need, free education at all levels was made a constitutional right.

Investment in education doubled from 3 per cent of GDP in 1999 to 6 per cent of a much greater GDP in 2011, funding provision such as free nurseries, free school meals and the constriction of more than 3,000 new schools and 40 new higher education institutions. Two million children were added to school rolls, a 25 per cent increase.

Millions of adults were also enabled to return to school to complete their basic education, while Unesco data recorded Venezuela as achieving the fifth highest level of university enrolment in the world.

Free education as a legal right was just one measure of a new progressive constitution instituted by Chavez that guaranteed a wide range of human rights and prohibited discrimination. Turning these provisions into everyday reality against a background of decades of deep-rooted discrimination was never going to be easy, but huge advances were made under Chavez’s leadership.

Women were the main beneficiaries of the social programmes tackling poverty and disadvantage, such as entitlements to social security, help to set up small businesses and co-operatives and advancements of women’s rights in the workplace, particularly through the 2012 Labour Law legislation.

Coupled with these material improvements was a drive to ensure that the concerns of women were represented at the heart of the political process. This led to women substantially increasing their representative and leadership roles, particularly in the 35,000 community councils that form the backbone, along with 130,000 grassroots “Bolivarian Circles” in neighbourhoods and workplaces across the country, of Venezuela’s constitutional commitment to being a participatory democracy.

The new progressive constitution also provided protection for indigenous people and those of African descent, within an acknowledged multi-ethnic and multicultural society. Parliamentary political representation was guaranteed; a Ministry for Indigenous People set up in 2007 and service provision such as medical care tailored to meet specific community needs.

Alongside redistributing 1.4 million acres left idle in large landed estates to 15,000 peasant families, Chavez’s government returned one million hectares to indigenous communities through 40 collective title deeds

While a specific law against racial discrimination was passed in 2011, Chavez — proud of his own African heritage — also promoted the celebration of indigenous and African ancestry and culture.

The 1999 constitution’s fundamental provision that “The state shall guarantee to every person, in accordance with the progressive principle and without discrimination, the enjoyment and inalienable, indivisible and interdependent human rights,” also enabled Venezuela’s LGBT communities to strengthen their struggle against homophobia and transphobia.

The 2012 Labour Law explicitly prohibited “exclusion or restriction in access to work and work conditions” based on sexuality, as well as other forms of discrimination.

Chavez’s programme also included advancing rights for disabled people, rooted in the new constitution’s commitment that “any person with disabilities or special needs has the right to the full and autonomous exercise of his or her abilities.” The 2007 Law for Disabled People helped translate this commitment into effect through various measures, not least the establishment of a specific Mission to meet the medical and social needs of disabled people.

Taken together, all these policies had lifted five million Venezuelans out of poverty by 2011 and transformed the lives of many more.

But to help realise his vision that “another world is possible,” not just for Venezuela, Chavez also led the creation of key regional organisations to unite Latin American voices and provide progressive economic alternatives to neoliberalism, such as the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (Celac), a regional bloc made up of 33 nations, and the Bolivarian Alliance for the Peoples of Our Americas (Alba), a trade alliance made up of eight countries.

On the global scale, he opposed the disastrous US wars on Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya, becoming ever more an enemy of the Bush administration, who (like New Labour’s Denis MacShane) backed the shortly successful coup against him in 2002.
Of course, like any other leader, he made mistakes — and he was known to have regretted not doing more to diversify the economy away from its historical overreliance on oil, which has caused so many difficulties in recent years — but we mustn’t let enemies of socialism delete from history what he achieved.

I was proud to host Chavez as mayor of London when he visited here, and I’m proud to write this article on his achievements and legacy today.

Chavez was the spark for a revival of the Left and Latin American liberation in the 21st century and for that he will always be remembered.

Raymond #fundie motherjones.com

On November 06, 2012, The United States of America passed away with an almost silent whimper. She was 236 years old. The grand old lady died of neglect, stupidity, arrogance and pure abuse at the hands of both her leaders and its ignorant populace. She will be survived by the Socialist Democratic Republic of Obamerica or SDRO.Also killed in this same massive, catastrophic, progressive wreck were personal freedoms, American values, exceptionalism, The Constitution, economic growth, conservatism, fiscal sanity, American unity, free markets, life's sanctity, marriage between man and woman, Republicanism, free will, self-reliance and many more so mutilated as to be unrecognizable any longer. July 4, 1776 - Born
November 6, 2012 - Committed Suicide

FEZZILLA #fundie christianforums.com

Yes. If you've speant the time studying and debating communism like I have you'd know that all those far-left liberals who go on their commy march against religious freedom (or actually, Christian freedom!) you would thoroughly understand that our country is under attack by communist ideology. I know several people in my local area who are involved with brainwashing people out of their American rights. The ACLU upholds the constitution of the U.S.S.R., but the U.S. constitution it is attacking! Our country was meant to be a country of religious freedom, not atheistic propaganda and fascism.

And thats the truth..

Kristi17 #wingnut #fundie nowtheendbegins.com

Greta Thunberg she is Extreme Left-Wing Liberal and Anti-Christian and Jewish people / Anti-Isreal-Yisreal / Anti-Christian ( Anitchrist ) / Anti-USA Constitution and Capitalism / Anti-Holy Bible!!

Shameful of these extreme Left-Wing Liberals and California!!

There is NO such thing as Global Warming aka Climate Change!! Our ONE TRUE GOD THE HEAVENLY FATHER and HIS SON Christ-Messiah Jesus-Yeshua CONTROLS THE WEATHER ( UNIVERSE ) and our Judeo-Christian Nation United States of and Israel-Yisrael and our Christian Earth!! The Global Warming HOAX ~> ( https://kristiann1.com/2014... )!!
.
.[image of flags of USA and Israel redacted]
.
Christ-Messiah Jesus-Yeshua is our only WORLDS HOPE for our Judeo-Christian Nation United States of America and Israel-Yisrael and our Christian Earth!!

Christ-Messiah Jesus-Yeshua Came too SAVE you all everyone through Foreveremore!!

I am Pro-Israel-Yisrael / Pro-Zionism / Pro-Christian and Jewish people / Pro-USA Constitution and Capitalism / Pro-Holy Bible KJV / PRO-LIFE!!

I am a Devout Christian Conservative Republican Patriot in our Judeo-Christian Nation United States of America and Israel-Yisrael!!

Happy Shavua Tov ( Good Week ) Everyone!! Also Happy Veterans Day too all our Veterans!!

Love 💕 Always and Shalom ( Peace ), YSIC \o/

Kristi Ann

Teutonic Knight #sexist incels.co

[Historypill] Why the Western white men have become such cucks

It's a bit long text but I can't put it any shorter.

The men that I have in mind: White heterosexual middle class and working class men from Western Europe and Northern America. Why have they become such cucks?

These men have had a very specific cultural and social history. They have been conditioned through centuries to obey their elite and to respect the hierarchy. First during the medieval and post-medieval feudal system. Then in the 19th century, these feudal states transformed into secular nations. The non-aristocratic men of all classes were technically given liberty but at the same time, they now had to follow a new religion of being loyal to the nation and its institutions, its symbols, its cultural and industrial elite. This was furthered by secularism which removed the power religion to a large extent and separated it from the state, so the state became THE religion.

These regular white men had to work hard in factory, support their families, go to wars for their nations and were expected to be blindly loyal to the Institutions of the State and its Law. A modern ideal of manliness was born out of this that among other things included the idea that you should accept all the hardships ("men don't cry", men aren't supposed to show emotions etc.) and that you should always blame yourself for your failures, because you live in this wonderful nation that provides you with everything. This is the mentality from which the incels are judged today (basically as a man, you should never complain, and if you have a problem, it's your own fault).

During the 19th century, these Western European nation-states became the dominant superpowers and controlled almost the entire world. The white Western men suddenly became an aristocracy of their own in the global perspective, fueled by the ideas of the white racial superiority, and they started to see themselves as such. The white race as a whole adopted the aristocratic mentality that they are the noble men who have to spread civilization all over the planet (the idea of the white man's burden). The white men now became the gentlemen, the white knights, the nobility of the world.

Meanwhile, the Western society started "liberating" all kinds of "vulnerable" groups from the supposed "oppression". After the WW2, this process was intensified and was systematically directed by the institutions of the Western states. The Western white men were expected not only to continue to respect their regime and its institutions and its new ideology, but also to stoically accept all the insults and provocations from all the feminists, gays, degenerate "artists" and other groups dedicated to shame the white men and their past. The white men were expected to bear all this and they did because they still saw themselves as some sort of gentlemen and aristocracy that is "above this". It's basically like the concept of noblesse oblige where the nobility is expected to be held to a different code of conduct than the rest of society and to be generous and benevolent, not lowering itself to the conduct of the plebeian lower classes. This is basically what you have in the society today, one code of conduct for the white men (you have to be liberal, respectful, humble, work hard, don't complain) and another for everyone else (you can complain, be loud, insult). White men were raised with this code of chivalry for a long time and have integrated these ideas about protecting the weak. They repressed their manly impulses which would mandate them to lash out and respond aggressively.

This is why the middle class and working class white men allowed all of this post-WWII feminism, LGBT, sexual liberation and other degeneracy to flourish. They believed that they still held a position of power and that they have a responsibility to serve the Western civilization (which became synonymous with liberalism, capitalism, feminism and 'freedom'). So they not only accepted all the degeneracy and all the insults, but even became proud of it and bragged to the entire world about what kind of freedom they have. They were doing it from a position of power, feeling as if it's their duty to protect the weak. This why you have all these manly men in Western armies bragging about fighting against the Muslims or other non-Westerners for "muh Western freedom" while their Western women are whoring themselves out at home. They're actually proud of this degeneracy. They see it as a sign of power and progress. Ever wondered why the American army doesn't have any equivalent to Muslim nasheeds? Because for the Western men, listening to some degenerate rap is their nasheed as it symbolizes the alleged power of Western liberation and global supremacy.

The thing is, all these vulnerable groups that the regular white men are supposed to protect and bow down to in fact aren't weak at all. They have been systematically protected by the increasingly more powerful State and its Institutions (that the white men are blindly loyal to) for decades. The West gives this groups like women, LGBT, immigrants etc. special privileges like the old feudal kings used to do in the past, so that in turn, they can expect their support and loyalty. This is basically what we have in the West right now, these "weak" "vulnerable" groups serve the system, they endorse it, they want stronger state, stronger institutions, stronger police repression (at the excuse of protect this vulnerable groups) etc. And the system gladly accepts their demands.

It's very interesting to note that the feminists never really opposed the white-knightism and chivalry of the patriarchical Western culture. They're perfectly fine with the middle class and working class white men thinking that they hold this alleged position of power where they have to help women. They don't want to convince them into true equality because if there was true equality, they wouldn't need these white knights, and the white knights would no longer help them. The feminists are just promoting a specific type of ideology that tries to strengthen the system and its ideological norms and which tries to humiliate the white men while at the same time giving them a false impression to these men that they're actually being noble and strong.

The white Western men are still too blind to see all of this. They still believe in the old conduct of chivalry, either in the form of being a left wing cuck, or a right wing cuck. They both very similar in mentality when it comes to protecting "muh freedom" (which in reality just means giving more power to the state which gives you this "freedom" and protects it). Both left and right wing cucks are blindly loyal to the West and see it as the peak of all human civilization and progress.

The attitude towards racism is very similar in the West too in terms of white-knightism. As a white male you're supposed to formally criticize every form of white racism, but this comes from a specific position of power as well. As a white male, you're also expected to be much more liberal than a non-white male. Non-whites can get away with certain anti-liberal ideas but the whites can't (eg. Muslims can be much more radical than the white Christians who get persecuted for the slightest offense). This is because as a white man, you're supposed to be a gentleman and protect the "weaker" races. This is literally what this so-called liberal "anti-racism" is all about. It's not about equality of the races, it's about white men being expected to be cucks and white knights for other races. So it's essentially racist in itself, although it doesn't really benefit the majority of the white race (and arguably it doesn't help the non-white races either).

Note, I'm talking about middle class and lower class white men here. There are whites who do perfectly fine in the West now, the rich oligarchic elite which holds the power, the politicians, judges etc. They hold a similar position to the aristocracy and clergy in the feudal systems, they're the ones who are actually above all of those things and laugh at the pathetic white peasants who work like idiots for this system while being humiliated and insulted by all the privileged "weak and vulnerable" groups at the same time.

What keeps the regular white men going? Four things: 1) century-long blind loyalty to the state, the church (the churches have unfortunately become too westernized and weakened to stand up to the anti-Christian secular states), the institutions, the legal system, the hierarchy etc. 2) an utopian belief that they can ascend to being the elite themselves. No matter how bad the situation is for them, they still have some weird hope that they can get a normal family, earn big money etc. This comes from the American capitalist mentality of pursuit of happiness, American dream (this mentality is now prevalent all over the West). 3) Relative economic prosperity which still enables all kinds of copes. The illusion of the mighty West that will continue to dominate the world through science and technology and solve everything. Addiction to the materialistic world and hedonism. 4) Fear of going against the Western idea of manliness where as a man, you're not supposed to cry and complain. This is further fueled by the secular humanism which promotes the idea that you are the master of your own destiny and if you have a personal problem, you have to find a solution yourself and solve it.

Incels are a problem for the regime because they have opted out of all this and don't share this mentality (other than maybe what I described under the number 3). This is also where this obsession with painting incels as "frustrated white men" (when there are in fact plenty of non-white incels) comes from. The regime fears that the white men will abandon it and stopped being the obeying little peasants. They want the white men to continue thinking that they're the gentlemen and noble white knights of this system because once the local Western white men stop being productive, it's pretty much the end for the West as we know it. That's why they want to shame the white men who turn incel.

The end of the West will come either way. This society has nothing more to offer (culturally, philosophically), it has clearly degenerated way beyond the point of no return. While not necessarily blackpilled, people are more and more cynical, they don't want to serve their nations as much as they used to (harder and harder to find people who want to serve in the army), this whole nihilism that the West promoted in regards to religion and traditionalism is now backfiring and is starting to question their own liberal ideology as well. Incels are simply a sign of things that are about to come as the men abandon the Western ideals of manliness.

Ellis Washington #conspiracy renewamerica.com

Why does this existential, invidious racism against minorities who achieve outside the slave chains of affirmative action still exist in the twenty first century? Because the original intent of affirmative action was NOT equality, but egalitarianism (tokenism, racial quotas, and statistics), not real equality, but hypocritical counterfeit equality that for example, allows the Left to set up thousands of so-called "Office of Diversity" at colleges and universities all over America. White people aren't stupid. They are fully aware that these leftist bureaucracies don't further racial diversity, but on the contrary establish a progressive, socialist Groupthink throughout higher education because on average professors holding a conservative worldview (like me) are hired at the 0-10 percentile while those professors holding to a liberal, Marxist, progressive or postmodernist worldview are hired at the 95-100 percentile. Ergo, what type of students will American college propaganda factories likely produce – me or a Barack and Michelle Obama?

Is this affirmative action? Is this justice or is this White Democratic Socialist Party hypocrisy and invidious ideological racism? If it is the latter, it must be exposed and eradicated by more and more people in a power position to do so. America, stop allowing racist liberals, reactionary progressives, delusional evolution atheists and unhinged postmodernists the power to set up these phony institutions like affirmative action, Offices of Diversity, speech codes, hate crime statues and phony LBJ 1964 Civil Rights Act and 1965 Voting Rights Acts which LBJ cynically bragged to two governors aboard Air Force One if he could pass through Congress "I would have those Niggers voting Democrat for the next 200 years." Stop this insanity.

Let all people of good will rise up and with the Michigan voters who in 2006 passed Proposal 2 and say No to affirmative action. Let every Black American say No to the slave chains of White guilt, servile tokenism and racial quotas and have enough honor to say, "If I'm not smart enough to go to Harvard, then I'll go to Howard, but at least wherever I go to college I won't have the sword of Damocles hanging over my head, over my career telling all who view me that I didn't earn my education, my vocation, my rightful place in society."

End affirmative action, end affirmative slave chains!

Dave Blount #racist moonbattery.com

Latest “Teen” Craze: Setting Whites on Fire

Any left-wing phenomenon, if left unchecked, will grow. Progressives progress by always pushing the envelope. For example, attacking random whites and beating them unconscious used to be a cutting edge activity for “teens” (the media’s euphemism for blacks who commit crimes). But by the time the media finally got around to grudgingly reporting on it, the Knockout Game was already passé.

Now they set whites on fire. DailyKenn.com has collected multiple examples. Just a few samples[...]

For plenty more cases, many involving fire, refer to Why Do Blacks Attack Old White People?

The seeds of aggrievement planted by the liberal media and education establishments are blossoming into flames.

Needless to say, if whites did this to blacks, it would crowd out every other news story with the possible exception of Nelson Mandela hagiographies.

But don’t forget, white people deserve it because a minority of us had ancestors who owned slaves going on two centuries ago.

fubusvitch #racist reddit.com

fubusvitch:

I'm a mod at r/IsraelExposed. Several of the mods there are Jewish. My wife is Jewish. I was married by my Rabbi under a huppa and our baby was named by the same Rabbi. We host Passover dinner at our house every year. We're active at our local Temple.

I fight to make sure that IsraelExposed doesn't become anti-Semitic. The trolls try. We constantly ban hitler apologists and anti-semites there. People don't recognize the difference between criticizing the Israeli government and being an anti-semite. This includes the op. The op is the kind of guy who'd call Bernie Sanders an anti-semite.

I also mod antifascistsofreddit. The op has made several accounts and has been ban evading and blowing up our modmail calling us "Nazis" among other things. The op has been completely unhinged and antagonistic to us. I can post screengrabs for proof if need be, if the other mods will let me. But there interaction with you here should be telling, as should this user having only a day old account should be an indicator.

This user is also u/Angry-Corbynista.

Angry-Corbynista:

Right. It was an anything goes cess pool but has been converted to a very typical for Reddit left wing antisemitic cess pool. You can’t openly glorify Hitler anymore but instead you glorify Hitler’s benefactors.

That there are Jews involved only makes it more disgusting. There are plenty of Jewish Antisemites; strangely they’re always found on the far left. 🤔🤔 Like Tony Greenstein,. suspended from labour for antisemitism. Do you know how hard that is? It’s like being too racist for the KKK.

Or Miko Peled, who gives speeches at events organized by Holocaust deniers, among many other displays Jew hate.

Or Holocaust denier Gilad Atzmon. Many many more, these are just the tip of the iceberg. And always among the very far antiZionist left.

You support Antisemites. Period. Saying a Jew can’t be an Antisemite is like saying an Isreali can’t be an antiZionist. It’s a meaningless statement meant to distract. And likewise there have always been Jews like this - kapos and Bundist far left Jews who told eastern and Central European Jews during the first half’s of the 1900s how safe they were in Berlin and Warsaw and how unnecessary Israel was . And before that, Hellenized Jews who opposed the Maccabees.

Also I call you left wing Nazis, bc that’s what you are. Left wing Nazis were socialist, anti Jew, antiZionist, anti capitalism... isn’t that you?

Everyone on earth recognizes the difference between criticizing Israel’s govt and antisemitism. Just as everyone on earth understands that what you ppl do most definitely isn’t “criticizing Isreali policy” and most definitely is lying to demonize the Jewish state. You’ll frame any and all Antisemitism as “criticizing Isreali policy”.. We’re all very familiar with your type of hypocritical Antisemitism.

fubosvitch:

I didn't say a Jewish person couldn't be an anti-semite. I said you're the kind of person who can't tell the difference between anti-Semitism and someone like Bernie criticising the Israeli government.

Dinesh D'Souza #fundie rightwingwatch.org

Conservative author Dinesh D’Souza compared left-wing protestors who destroyed a Confederate statue in North Carolina to the terrorist organization ISIS and violent fascist regimes.

D’Souza appeared on the August 15 episode of Fox News Radio’s “Todd Starnes Show” to continue blaming the left for violent protests in Charlottesville, Virginia, where a white supremacist alt-right demonstrator killed one person and injured more than a dozen others after speeding his vehicle into a group of counter-protestors.

Before ending the interview, Starnes turned the discussion to “anti-fascist” protesters in North Carolina who forcefully toppled a bronze statue that memorialized Confederate soldiers. Starnes asked D’Souza if Americans should “be concerned about this whitewashing of history,” to which D’Souza responded by comparing the protestors to ISIS and other fascist groups.

“Just think about it. When is the last time somebody did this?,” D’Souza said. “The last time somebody did this is when ISIS was sandblasting and blowing up statues.”

D’Souza continued, “This whole idea that you want to erase history that you don’t like—this is a kind of behavior that is characteristic of a despotic mindset. The fascists did the same thing.”

Liberals, D’Souza claimed, are comparable to “black shirts” in Benito Mussolini’s fascist Italian regime and “brown shirts” in Nazi Germany. “The fascist mindset is revealing itself fully on the left,” D’Souza said.

D’Souza’s comparison is yet another installment of the pro-Trump right’s attempts to blame the violence in Charlottesville on the left. The conservative author has also capitalized on the violence in Charlottesville to promote his new book, which promises to expose “the Nazi roots of the American Left.”

Kevin Sorbo Official Facebook Page #fundie facebook.com

Just saying:

This could solve the gun concerns!

In 1865 a Democrat shot and killed Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States.

In 1881 a left wing radical Democrat shot James Garfield, President of the United States - who later died from the wound.

In 1963 a radical left wing socialist shot and killed John F. Kennedy, President of the United States.

In 1975 a left wing radical Democrat fired shots at Gerald Ford, President of the United States.

In 1983 a registered Democrat shot and wounded Ronald Reagan, President of the United States.

In 1984 James Hubert, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 22 people in a McDonalds restaurant.

In 1986 Patrick Sherrill, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 15 people in an Oklahoma post office.

In 1990 James Pough, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 10 people at a GMAC office.

In 1991 George Hennard, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 23 people in a Luby's cafeteria in Killeen , TX.

In 1995 James Daniel Simpson, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 5 coworkers in a Texas laboratory.

In 1999 Larry Asbrook, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 8 people at a church service.

In 2001 a left wing radical Democrat fired shots at the White House in a failed attempt to kill George W. Bush, President of the US ...

In 2003 Douglas Williams, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 7 people at a Lockheed Martin plant.

In 2007 a registered Democrat named Seung - Hui Cho, shot and killed 32 people in Virginia Tech.

In 2010 a mentally ill registered Democrat named Jared Lee Loughner, shot Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and killed 6 others.

In 2011 a registered Democrat named James Holmes, went into a movie theater and shot and killed 12 people.

In 2012 Andrew Engeldinger, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 7 people in Minneapolis.

In 2013 a registered Democrat named Adam Lanza, shot and killed 26 people in a school in Newtown , CT.

As recently as Sept 2013, an angry Democrat shot 12 at a Navy ship yard.

Clearly, there is a problem with Democrats and guns.

Not one NRA member, Tea Party member, or Republican conservative was involved in any of these shootings and murders.

SOLUTION: It should be illegal for Democrats to own guns.

Graywolf12 #fundie absoluterights.com

Efficient Gun Control that makes sense.
•In 1863 a Democrat shot and killed Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States.
•In 1881 a left wing radical Democrat shot James Garfield, President of the United States, who later died from the wound.
•In 1963 a radical left wing socialist shot and killed John F. Kennedy, President of the United States.
•In 1975 a left wing radical Democrat fired shots at Gerald Ford, President of the United States.
•In 1983 a registered Democrat shot and wounded Ronald Reagan, President of the United States.
•In 1984 James Hubert, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 22 people in a McDonalds restaurant.
•In 1986 Patrick Sherrill, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 15 people in an Oklahoma post office.
•In 1990 James Pough, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 10 people at a GMAC office.
•In 1991 George Hennard, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 23 people in a Luby's cafeteria.
•In 1995 James Daniel Simpson, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 5 coworkers in a Texas laboratory.
•In 1999 Larry Asbrook, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 8 people at a church service.
•In 2001 a left wing radical Democrat fired shots at the White House in a failed attempt to kill George W. Bush, President of the US.
•In 2003 Douglas Williams, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 7 people at a Lockheed Martin plant.
•In 2007 a registered Democrat named Seung - Hui Cho, shot and killed 32 people in Virginia Tech.
•In 2010 a mentally ill registered Democrat named Jared Lee Loughner, shot Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and killed 6 others.
•In 2011 a registered Democrat named James Holmes, went into a movie theater and shot and killed 12 people.
•In 2012 Andrew Engeldinger, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 7 people in Minneapolis.
•In 2013 a registered Democrat named Adam Lanza, shot and killed 26 people in a school.

One could go on, but you get the point, even if the media does not. Clearly, there is a problem with Democrats and guns.

No NRA member, Tea Party member, or Republican conservatives are involved.

SOLUTION: It should be illegal for Democrats to own guns.

Little.Alex #fundie fark.com

["If the Nazi party is the national socialist party, why is it considered right wing?"

"Where a party lies on the political spectrum comes from actions, not names."]

False.

To answer the question: Nazis are considered right wing, because the Left wants to re-write history. In the 1930s: the Left loved the Fascist and the Nazis. Time Magazine fawned over Hitler, and made him Man of the Year twice. Now they want to disown them, so they claim they're right wing.

The Nazis wanted a government without constitutional limitations, redistributing income, and with a set of special privileges for the preferred race: exactly like American Democrats today.

Read "Mein Kampf". Putting aside the militarism; Hitler's politics are mainstream Lefty. -all about class envy, hating the rich/educated and income redistribution.

Liberty Counsel, Family Research Council, et al #fundie pjmedia.com

No fewer than 60 organizations branded "hate groups" or otherwise attacked by the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) are considering legal action against the left-wing smear factory, a Christian legal nonprofit leader confirmed to PJ Media on Tuesday. He suggested that the $3 million settlement and apology the SPLC gave to Maajid Nawaz and his Quilliam Foundation on Monday would encourage further legal action.
"We haven't filed anything against the SPLC, but I think a number of organizations have been considering filing lawsuits against the SPLC, because they have been doing to a lot of organizations exactly what they did to Maajid Nawaz," Mat Staver, founder and chairman of Liberty Counsel, told PJ Media on Tuesday.
Liberty Counsel filed a lawsuit against the charity navigation organization GuideStar for defamation after GuideStar adopted the SPLC's "hate group" list. That lawsuit is ongoing.

In 2016, the SPLC published its "Field Guide to Anti-Muslim Extremists," listing Muslim reformer Maajid Nawaz, a practicing Muslim, as one such extremist. The left-wing group listed various reasons for including him, changing the reasons every so often, and even at one point mentioning that he had gone to a strip club for his bachelor party.
On Monday, SPLC President Richard Cohen extended his group's "sincerest apologies to Mr. Nawaz, Quilliam, and our readers for the error, and we wish Mr. Nawaz and Quilliam all the best." In settling the suit, the SPLC paid Nawaz's organization $3.375 million.

"This is a significant settlement," Staver told PJ Media. "3.375 million dollars, and it did not even go to litigation; it was a result of a demand letter."

Importantly, "the allegations that were at issue here were very similar to the allegations against the other groups," the Liberty Counsel chairman explained. "The SPLC promotes false propaganda, demonizes and labels groups they disagree with, and that labeling has economic as well as physical consequences."
Sponsored

The SPLC started as a group to oppose racist terrorism, and its first legal action targeted the Ku Klux Klan. In recent decades, the organization has begun marking mainstream organizations as "hate groups" on par with the KKK. Last year, 47 nonprofit leaders denounced the SPLC's "hate list" in an open letter to the media. The SPLC has admitted that its "hate group" list is based on "opinion.""SPLC's partisan tactics and slander have ruinous, real-world consequences for which they should not be excused; we are evaluating all our options to defend the good name of ADF, including possible legal action," Tedesco concluded.
Staver noted that the SPLC labels groups "in order to destroy them," and he pointed out that that characterization comes from the SPLC's own words. The Liberty Counsel chairman also referenced a terror attack inspired by the left-wing group's "hate map."
In 2012, Floyd Lee Corkins III broke into the Family Research Council (FRC), aiming to kill everyone in the building. He admitted to targeting the FRC because the SPLC listed it as an "anti-gay group" on its "hate map." That wasn't the only incident connecting the SPLC with terror, however.
"Even the shooter last year in D.C. was a Facebook fan of the SPLC and the SPLC ran a false article saying [House Majority Whip] Steve Scaliese was a white supremacist," Staver added. In a statement, Nawaz himself had highlighted the connection between the SPLC and James Hodgkinson, the Congressional Baseball Game shooter last summer.
"There are people out there that are unhinged. They go out and take action. They assume that somebody hates them," the Liberty Counsel chairman explained. Due to these radical actors, "You have to be careful with your language. We can disagree but we can't demonize one another. Certainly, do not do anything that would put somebody that you disagree with in physical danger."
"The groups that we're talking to, that have approached us, all of them oppose violence," Staver said. "None of them advocate violence. They don't agree with the SPLC on certain issues, but they oppose violence. They have no reason to hate anyone."
It is hard to predict how a 60-party lawsuit against the SPLC's "hate group" labeling would play out. D. James Kennedy Ministries, the Christian nonprofit that sued Amazon and the SPLC over the "hate group" defamation last year, reported in late May that a preliminary hearing on its case was a "positive development."
Nawaz's case may be unique, since it involved a devout Muslim slandered as an "anti-Muslim extremist." Even so, the settlement does give grounds for hope, and the falsely labeled "hate groups" are considering their options.

Staver insisted that the settlement with Nawaz "will encourage further legal action." He suggested that the settlement "helps our lawsuit against GuideStar" and may encourage organizations that were considering suing the SPLC to actually file the paperwork.
"There are probably about 60 organizations that we're talking to — there's at least 60," Staver told PJ Media. He mentioned the group of 47 nonprofit leaders who denounced the SPLC last year, and said "that group has grown since then."
Furthermore, many of the "hate groups" attacked by the SPLC do not encourage hate or violence, but merely disagree with the left-wing organization's political views. Many — like the Family Research Council (FRC), the Ruth Institute, and Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) — merely stand for marriage as between one man and one woman. The SPLC has twisted 30-year-old arguments to smear these groups, and in one egregious case the group actually quoted as hateful the Catechism of the Catholic Church.

Other organizations attacked by the SPLC also told PJ Media they are "considering their options" regarding a lawsuit.
"Truthfully, I have not been following the activities of the SPLC too closely," Jennifer Roback Morse, founder and president of the Ruth Institute, an organization that lost its credit card processor, Vanco Payments, over the SPLC's "hate group" labeling last year, told PJ Media. "Pursuing our mission is more important than attempting to take on the behemoth of the SPLC."
"I must say, though, this apology to Mr. Nawaz has caused us to consider our options," Morse added, cryptically.
"We are reviewing all our legal options," J.P. Duffy, a spokesman for the Family Research Council, told PJ Media on Tuesday.
A spokesman for Prager University, another organization attacked by the SPLC, said that "at this point" the group had "no intention to sue," but they "reserve the right to change their mind as the situation evolves."
Jeremy Tedesco, senior counsel at Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), echoed this trend, saying his organization is "evaluating all our options," including a potential lawsuit.
"It's appalling and offensive for the Southern Poverty Law Center to compare peaceful organizations which condemn violence and racism with violent and racist groups just because it disagrees with their views," Tedesco told PJ Media. "That's what SPLC did in the case of Quilliam and its founder Maajid Nawaz, and that's what it has done with ADF and numerous other organizations and individuals."
"This situation confirms once again what commentators across the political spectrum have been saying for decades: SPLC has become a far-left organization that brands its political opponents as 'haters' and 'extremists' and has lost all credibility as a civil rights watchdog," the ADF senior counsel added.
Tedesco defended the good name of Alliance Defending Freedom, which SPLC falsely maligns as a "hate group." "With eight wins in the last seven years at the U.S. Supreme Court and hundreds of victories for free speech at America's public universities, ADF is one of the nation's most respected and successful legal advocates, working to preserve our fundamental freedoms of speech, religion, and conscience for people from all walks of life," he said.

NoDragQueensInGovernment #fundie mediamatters.org

NoDragQueensinGovernment • in a few seconds

Drag Queens have no business in the armed forces. The only place these confused males should be tolerated is in a gay parade. They are awkward and scary for some adults and they truly scare children. Allowing a dude in high heels, stockings and makeup to flaunt around in the military is ridiculous nonsense and I'm very happy Trump put a dead stop to this insanity

NoDragQueensinGovernment • in a few seconds

Since when has it been an "American" staple of having cross dressing drag queens, males who think they are women in soldiers uniforms? Absolutely never. It's always the actual unAmericans, trying to lecture us about what is American. You are enemies of America, there is nothing "American" about you left wing extremists, you are all allied with and support anti American maliciousness.

NoDragQueensinGovernment Messed are the Bleak • a few seconds ago

Drag queen weirdos have been banned, and plenty more disgusting left wing degeneracy will be undone through Trump's 8 years. Get used to groveling and whining on a left wing extremist website, because we aren't stopping, we are barely even warmed up.

NoDragQueensinGovernment Messed are the Bleak • in a few seconds

You are the triggered snowflakes, we are the ones triggering you weak enemies and stomping you when you are down.

NoDragQueensinGovernment Messed are the Bleak • a few seconds ago

And you say that, while hiding in a safespace behind pixels... Easy, when the threat of an enemy such as myself who has every intention of opening up your throat from ear to ear in a real encounter, isn't quite there.

Chris Roberts #wingnut #racist amren.com

Can Hispanics, Asians, and White Progressives Launch a Socialist Insurgency in the Western United States?

If not now, soon.

The fight for the Democrat presidential nomination is all but over. Joe Biden’s coalition of blacks, white suburbanites, and old people gave him one crushing victory after another, and — barring an act of God — he will face President Donald Trump in the general election. Senator Bernie Sanders failed to mount much resistance to Mr.. Biden nationally, but the democratic socialist’s successes in the West mean trouble for that region’s centrist Democrats. Mr. Sanders won the California primary and the Nevada caucus because of strong support from Hispanics and Asians in both states, neither of which had enough white moderates or blacks to stop him.

White advocates have long warned that America’s forthcoming non-white majority will end conservatism and destroy the Republican Party, but what is happening is more complex. Within the Democrat Party, a divide is forming along racial lines. There is a moderate wing backed by blacks and certain whites, particularly old people and suburbanites. Then there is a more leftist, or even socialist wing of younger and urban whites and non-black minorities. Mr. Sanders has twice demonstrated that the socialist wing can’t win at the national level — but it can win locally.

Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is a good example. In 2018, with the backing of the Democratic Socialists of America, she launched a primary challenge against Joseph Crowley, a moderate white Democrat, in New York’s 14th Congressional district. Its racial makeup is 11 percent black, 16 percent Asian, 18 percent white, and 50 percent Hispanic. That makes it solidly blue (Hillary Clinton won it in 2016 with 76 percent of the vote), but it also means no black/white alliance backing a moderate can stop a progressive who attracts Hispanics and Asians. Two years ago, Mr. Crowley complained, “I couldn’t help being born white” and lost to Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez by 15 points.

A similar election took place in California. Due to the Republican Party’s weakness and the state’s unusual election laws, in 2018, Senator Dianne Feinstein faced only one opponent in her bid for reelection: fellow Democrat Kevin de León, a progressive Hispanic. Though very few Americans would consider Mrs. Feinstein a “moderate,” her challenger ran to her left, claiming she didn’t oppose President Trump vigorously enough. He lost to her by less than ten points — 54.2 percent to 45.8 percent — and exit polls show that this race was similar to California’s primary:

Incumbents are very hard to beat; they win reelection at least 80 percent of the time. Mr. de León was running against a widely known figure who first won her Senate seat in 1992. You need a lot of money and staff to run against such an entrenched candidate, especially in a state of nearly 40 million people. Furthermore, as the more centrist of the two, Mrs. Feinstein presumably had the support of Republican voters in the general election. Even against all those obstacles, Mr. de León won with Hispanics — his own people and the state’s largest racial group — and lost most dramatically with blacks, the state’s smallest group. He also did better than Mrs. Feinstein’s last three Republican challengers, who won 37.5 percent of the vote in 2012, 35.0 percent in 2006, and 36.6 percent in 2000.

This November, another very prominent “moderate” white California incumbent will be tested against a younger, left-wing, non-white challenger. Nancy Pelosi is defending her seat against Shahid Buttar, a Pakistani democratic socialist. Her district covers most of San Francisco: 6 percent black, 15 percent Hispanic, 33 percent Asian, and 44 percent white. In other words, she has a good chance, but she’ll have to fight to win.

America’s Southwest will see more candidates like Mr. Buttar. Our nation’s rising tide of color is not uniform, and has plenty of internal divisions. That blacks are ending up in political coalitions at odds with Asians and Hispanics is an interesting development. But more important, far-left non-whites are increasingly challenging liberal whites. This should be a warning to those whites that this country is changing, and that no matter how enlightened they think they are, they’ll still be on the losing side in a non-white America.

JD Pendry #fundie thisainthell.us

If I have learned one thing in all the years I have been writing these posts it is that the mere mention of God is the best generator of keyboard borne venom. Last week, I wrote that our country’s founding principle is God-given freedom. In 2010, I posted Our Foundation is the Spirit of Freedom. It was my first post after a year long hiatus. So, it is not a new thought to me (or to history), but one I certainly hold to dearly.

I was questioned about where in our constitution is any reference to God or Jesus or any specific religion. The answer is in specific terms nowhere. With a rudimentary understanding of Judeo-Christian values and phrases like “endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights” and given the religious inclinations of the American populace at the time the phrase was penned, it is not a great leap of logic to conclude to which Creator the reference was made. I was asked whether I thought my rights came from God or some question similar to that and the answer is profoundly yes. Our Declaration of Independence is quiet clear on the origin of those unalienable rights among which are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. With that declaration in mind, those unalienable rights are protected in our Constitution and the Bill of Rights. So, where is God in our Constitution? He is all over it brother.

And another, the one that forever flies off the keyboard. If your God is so great, where was he when…” and just fill in whatever atrocity comes to mind. The answer to that (although the question itself exposes the questioner’s ignorance of Christianity and the Christian God) is that God lets people choose their way. God wants you to accept him by your own free will. If by your free will you choose another path he will turn you over to it as is well explained in Romans 1: 18-32. So let’s not blame God for the choices made by men. Then there is the Darwin worshipper who declares that belief in God is just an example of scientific ignorance. Might I ask? Is this the same science that declares man-made global warming is destroying the planet and the solution to that problem is a global wealth redistribution scheme?

The left (communists, Marxists, socialists, progressives, liberals…) mostly rejects Judeo-Christian values out of hand. Sure, there are those who lean left in their ideology who are Church goers and proclaimed Christians, but they have embraced things simply are not Biblical. The right (wholly evil in the minds of many on the left) certainly has its share of people who are as anti-Christian as anyone on the left could ever hope to be. What both have in common is the rejection of a higher moral authority – a rejection of God and his commandments.

Without a moral authority, who decides what is good or bad. Who would decide for people that it is wrong to murder – or for that matter, to do anything else? Moral relativism, for as destructive as it is we see it every single day. When an ultimate moral authority is rejected so is civil society and so is freedom.

I just heard presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, in a speech, declare that in our country we are going to have to modify deeply held religious beliefs adding that no one should be discriminated against because of who they love (with the exception of those having deeply held religious beliefs). I certainly agree with the part about not discriminating. Choosing your path in life whatever it is should not require that anyone else embrace it. In that light, Mrs. Clinton I refer you to the first commandment: Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind. While doing that, and in light of the most recent revelations you may want to contemplate the remaining 9 as well. I recommend Dennis Prager’s short book, The Ten Commandments: Still the Best Moral Code.

In our military, we are also seeing people persecuted because of their Christian beliefs. The worst of which, Chaplains are being disciplined for counseling from a Biblical perspective or praying in the name of Jesus. From what other perspective would one expect a Christian Chaplain to counsel or pray? History is quite clear about what Godless armies are capable of and their ultimate destruction.

It is also quite clear on the destiny of Godless nations. History is littered with their remains.

Samerica #fundie motherjones.com

never heard of him or his wife both should haven been aborted! I'm sure their
books are nothing but brainwashing liberal propaganda like most of these liberals
teachers and politicians are doing to our kids but if they had their way their would
be no kids because they support MURDERING BABIES before they are born!
boycott them both and all the left wing liberal progressive companies! I DO!
p.s. he looks like a pervert and she looks like a lesbian.

~Kay~ #fundie answers.yahoo.com

Angela, if you’re not a Christian, you have no right to get married. Why do non religious people insist on getting married? Marriage is a RELIGIOUS union between ONE man and ONE woman. how hard is that to figure out?

If your not Christian or not of another religion that practices marriage, then you have NO RIGHT (none, zero, nothing) to get married. You're also sinning by denying the existance of God. Jesus Christ died on the cross for you and this is how you honor him? by turning your back on him? disgusting.

why do I never see any Christian questions featured? why?

oh thats right, because yahoo hates Christians and hates moral family values. Yahoo is a website for left wing liberal socialists

micropenis29 #fundie incels.co

(Based) Fascism is NOT on the right side of the political spectrum

Foids love governments. The bigger the government, the more ways there are for incel money to get funneled to single-mom foids for various purposes. After all, someone has to pay for birth control, abortions, Chad and Tyrone's abandoned babies, etc. and the way foids see it, that someone might as well be incels.

Fascism is a left-wing ideology. Communism is also a left-wing ideology. Both are on the far left-end of the political ideological spectrum. Both make the government really, really fucking huge. Hence, foids adore these ideologies.

As we all know, foids are great liars. This is especially true when it comes to politics. Foids try to disguise their authoritarianism by framing fascism as a right-wing ideology. This allows them to smear real right-wing ideologies such as anarcho-capitalism, classical liberalism and libertarianism by wrongfully claiming that they're "closer on the spectrum to fascism" than socialism is.

This illusory false-dichotomy results in people rejecting all right-wing ideologies in favor of socialism, since "teehee everything to the right of socialism is the road to fascism you Nazis!"

Just remember, the real political spectrum looks like this:
image

Scott Lively #fundie scottlively.net

Lively to Run for Massachusetts Governor

The people of this state need a candidate who can clearly and unapologetically articulate Biblical values without fear or compromise. They need a candidate who will tell the simple truth that abortion is murder, and homosexuality is condemned by God (but that Jesus forgives and heals those who repent). That parents and not the state have authority over their children, because government is our servant and not our master. That socialism is slavery and humanism breeds corruption. But mostly they need a leader who will remind the people that Massachusetts was founded upon Jesus Christ and the Bible and that our future security and prosperity depend on restoring our trust in Him. “Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord!” Psalm 33:12.

These are very dark days in Massachusetts and across America, and growing steadily darker. I believe it is time for Christians with a strong Biblical worldview to rise up and preach the whole truth of the Bible as widely and boldly as possible. Massachusetts is the bluest of the blue states: the first to adopt socialized medicine and “gay marriage,” the national model for promoting homosexuality to children in the public schools, and the most aggressive defender of child-killing through abortion. The Mass Republican Party is solidly controlled by moderate to liberal “progressives” and the Democrats are virtual communists. They both embrace and champion the culture of death. With these two liberal parties splitting the liberal vote, a true conservative independent could win the governorship.

I feel both called and well prepared to meet this challenge. I am a fifth-generation Bay-Stater, born and raised in the Village of Shelburne Falls, with roots in the region going back to the early 1600s. I am a former left-wing liberal, who has learned by hard experience the folly of those ways. I am a constitutional lawyer and internationally-recognized authority on family and human rights issues from a Christian perspective. I have run my own successful businesses and know how to keep a budget. I am a missionary pastor with a doctorate in theology who for the past five years has founded and run an inner-city mission serving the poor and disadvantaged — a mission that is a model of racial harmony and community service — without accepting a dime of government funding.

My personal life theme of “redemption theology” is clearly reflected in all of my endeavors, and exactly what Massachusetts needs to recover from four decades of decline under Godless socialism.

[...]

I expect to often be asked by reporters what I think my prospects are for winning this election. To this I reply that it would take a miracle from God for Scott Lively to become Governor of Massachusetts — and I wouldn’t want it any other way. God should get the glory for any good thing that comes from this campaign. So don’t expect me to campaign like a politician. I will do nothing more than travel the state to offer what I believe are Biblical solutions to Massachusetts’ problems — and leave the rest to Almighty God.

May He Heal this Commonwealth

Dr. Scott Lively

eplarsenal #fundie yahoo.com

I strongly believe Governor Haley fits as the perfect V.P. selection so much that Left-Wings bloggers will begin "ramping up the attacks" after her RSOTU this evening.

I have felt that Governor Nikki Haley would make a great Vice-President, and future President alongside Ted Cruz or Marco Rubio.

Trump & Billary Hit'on Both have their issues as the author speaks about, some other possibilities include that one is a possible sociopath most likely to receive corruption charges involving issues unrelated to Benghazi. The other is as Andrew stated in his article, even though he did misstate the right wing part, should say [left-wing] as that is Trumps foundation. He only changed to Republican recently as it certainly does not look good to be really rich and entitled running as a Democrat (ie Obama v. Clinton 2008 (D) Primaries.)

...

Other than Trump & Hillary being capitalists because they are super-wealthy, they both have left-wing views. So the only true difference between Trump & the Clinton's is that Trump worked hard for his money (based on U.S. law) and earned it legally... meanwhile The Clinton's cashed in via Politics and law-subverting cash-crop vehicles like The Clinton foundation, in which Hillary, and possibly Bill as well, will most likely be indicted for activities relating to illegal actions taken while Secretary of State under the Obama Admin 2009-2013 " America’s principal avatar of right-wing intolerance, demonizing Mexicans, Muslims, and Megyn Kelly, among others,".

Trump & Billary Hit'on Both have their issues, one is a possible sociopath most likely to receive corruption charges involving issues unrelated to Benghazi. The other is as Andrew stated in the article, even though he misstated the right wing part, should be [left-wing] as that is where roots are.

I therefore endorse the only candidate that is an Incredibly Strong Leader, will Destroy ISIS, and will work to bring Jobs back to America.

Ted Cruz 2016 -

Nikki Haley V.P.??? That would be awesome!

Marco Rubio finishes a close second for me and therefore I believe whichever Candidate of the two Wins or competes better in Iowa or New Hampshire, should concede their votes and base to the other candidate for upcoming South Carolina... Which is 'The real reason Nikki Haley is Speaking tonight' as the 'Republican Debate' will be televised this 'Thursday on FBN Fox Business Network!' Based on previous debates this year, you will see 8 Republican Candidates that care deeply about American Jobs and Wages, Defeating ISIS, National Security, and a Party that Unites by Creating An Even Playing Field For All U.S. Citizens Economically. See you there!

Brandon Straka #fundie walkawaycampaign.com

The #WalkAway Campaign is a true grassroots movement, founded by former liberal, Brandon Straka, dedicated to providing a place to share #WalkAway testimonials and personal journeys to freedom. It is inspiring, exciting, heart-wrenching, and extraordinary to watch and read the stories of the individuals who no longer accept the current ideology of the Democratic Party, what it has become, and are now bravely sharing their stories with the world.

Some of us left long ago, while many have only recently begun to reject the narratives of the left. Some people have wanted to #WalkAway for some time now, but have feared the consequences they may be forced to endure from friends or family if they were to share their true feelings and #WalkAway.

The #WalkAway Campaign encourages and supports those on the Left to walk away from the divisive tenets endorsed and mandated by the Democratic Party of today. Classical liberalism on the left is a thing of the past. Today’s leftist pseudo-liberalism is more committed to expanding the scope of government, pushing us into collectivism, and groupthink. The Democratic Party has gone astray, and it is time to recognize that there is very little true liberalism practiced there anymore.
?
The “liberal” agenda of today has become authoritarian and fascist: forcing people into government-controlled health care; restricting school choice to assigned government-run schools; stifling speech that challenges liberal beliefs and candidates; buying political support from corrupt interest groups; welfare programs that breed dependence upon the state; legal preferences for particular groups rather than equality for all before the law; establishing price floors and ceilings enforceable by law; using government to redistribute wealth just to satisfy their egalitarian instincts, and shaming anyone who dares to deviate from their obligatory way of thinking.
?
The Democratic Party of today has adopted a destructive belief system, happily and without skepticism, separating people into groups based on identity and organizing them into camps of victims and oppressors. If you are a person of color, an LGBT person, a woman, or an American immigrant; the Democratic Party wants you to know that you are a victim and destined to stay that way.

They will insist that you are a victim doomed to exist within a system that is rigged against you; that you are a victim of systemic oppression; that you are a victim of your circumstances; and that no amount of hard work or motivational action will ever allow you to overcome your victimhood or the privilege of those around you.

This is perhaps the Democratic Party’s greatest and most insidious lie.

If you are a minority in America today the liberal media and left-wing politicians don’t want you to ever discover this lie. So they bombard us with stories designed to reinforce the narrative that you are in danger, that you can not succeed. They manipulate your fears and concerns by telling you that you are disadvantaged, disempowered, and disposable… to everyone except them.

Minorities in this country, are told by the Left, their entire lives that they are not welcome on the Right. They are told that they are hated because anyone who isn’t a Democrat is racist, bigoted, homophobic, xenophobic, and sexist. It is now the time for us to help minorities recognize that they do not owe their subjugation and allegiance to the Democratic Party. Centrists, Libertarians, Independents, and Conservatives believe there is a seat at the table for everyone. It is time for us to show minorities that they are cared about, appreciated and welcomed by conservatives and Republicans alike.

We invite Americans who have never been Democrats to join the campaign to share their own written and video #WalkWith testimonials supporting those courageous enough to #WalkAway. We need Americans on the Right to stand up and use their voices to tell the world the truth about what it actually means to be a conservative in America. We must come together to declare, loudly and often, who we really are, our real values, and finally expose the lies the Left has tried to place on us for far too long.

The #WalkAway Campaign also serves another fundamental purpose. For far too long, the Left has controlled the narrative in this country within the news and media, while the “silent majority” on the Right have done what they always do – remain silent. The Left has been allowed to reinforce the narrative that everyone on the Right is a bigot, a racist, a homophobe, a misogynist, and so on. This dangerous lie cannot be perpetuated any longer.

The Left has become so extreme and relentless that it is now the time for us to fight back!

The #WalkAway Campaign is a movement of Patriots from all walks of life – men, women, black, brown, white, straight, LGBTQ, religious, and non-believers – who share something very important in common.

WE ARE ALL AMERICANS, and we will not surrender our country.

Anonymous Coward #fundie godlikeproductions.com

Progressive Democrats Are The New Nazi Party

Their own actions speak for themselves,there is very little difference between radical left-wing progressivism and fascism.

Now that progressives are openly backing political violence against their opponents, they have technically crossed over.

NAZIs practiced or enforced:

Nationalized health care
Gun ownership rights stripped from citizens
Restrictions placed on free speech
Centralized control of the national economy
Capitalism banned
Centralized control of the media
Adherence to strict "green" environmental policies
Centralized control of education
Political violence against their opposition


The list goes on, but the key is progressive democrats today agree with pretty much everything the NAZIs did during their reign of terror against the world.


Progressive democrats are not liberals, not even to the slightest degree. True liberalism is a far right wing ideology that is predicated upon anti-authoritarianism, private property rights and the individual.

Anonymous Coward #fundie godlikeproductions.com

Refuse to click a Washington post link, but felt i should add this.

Regardless of what each political parties policies were even last election, in this modern presidency they mean two, very defined and very blunt things.

Conservative: Patriots and fans of the American constitution and the republic for which it stands.

Liberal: Neo-Socialist who sees America as an enemy and views the flag and constitution as “colonial”.

There is a clear line in the sand, the players are in position. All we are waiting for is the whistle at this point.

Ted Nugent #fundie wnd.com

Three key things are going to happen as a result of liberal zombie goons proposing banning so-called “assault weapons.” First, more so-called “assault weapons” and massive quantities of ammunition are going to be sold. Second, the NRA will gain more members.

Lastly, and regrettably, Americans will not be any safer from bug-eyed psychos or religious voodoo scum for the simple and glaring reason that the zombie in chief is focusing all his attention on good Americans exercising their constitutionally guaranteed God-given individual rights instead of stopping the Islamic voodoo devils who keep murdering innocent people in the name of his allah.

Donald Trump is skyrocketing in the polls as many Americans see through the thinly veiled lies, deceit and subterfuge of left-wing ideologues. Mr. Trump knows that Americans are disgusted with liberal politically correct horse dung laws, policies and counterproductive gun restrictions. Mr. Trump knows that more gun control will not make America safer but will only punish and endanger law-abiding citizens.

You want to make America a safer place to live, work and play? If so, ban liberal zombies and their horse dung toxic-

M. Espinola #conspiracy freerepublic.com

1960s era, radical communist leftists have had a documented history of demanding a violent total overthrow of the American government, and American way of life, however since this manipulative left-wing element still controls the White House, Senate, academia & most of the mass media, the public is told to unquestioning support everything 'their' Federal government mandates -- since the simple minded sheeple are viewed by the all knowing, vastly superior, Upper West Side, limousine liberal elite, as not being enlightened or 'progressive'.

If the bulk of the voting pubic, the very same public which rejected left-wing Obamaism in the most recent election, refuses to bow down to the ruling, elitist, leftist totalitarians, their controlled mass media viciously labels the majority of the American voters as being, 'right wing extremists!'.

How obviously hypocritical coming from communistic agenda driven political hacks playing their political power games, coupled with obviously seeking various calculated methods of brazen revenge on the bulk of voters, for tossing out the House radical-Dem-cabal, which until a short while ago was still dictatorially & arrogantly catapulting the America economy into a dark hole of astronomical debt, coupled with ripping up the U.S. Constitution.

Funny that MSNBC, NPR & the rest of the 'progressive media' forget to report all those death threats against President Bush by leftist fellow travelers.

Sinclair Jenkins & Kajsa Norman #racist amren.com

The Swedish Unimind

Marcellus famously said to Horatio, “Something is rotten in the state of Denmark.” Fortunately for today’s Danes, their politicians care about their citizens. This year the Danish Social Democrats, headed by Mette Frederiksen, blunted the rising power of the nationalist Danish People’s Party by co-opting their restrictionist immigration platform, and won over 25 percent of the vote. A young, left-wing female prime minister was poised to oversee a new era of nationalism.

Although the American media questioned Miss Frederiksen’s left-wing credentials, her party was returning to its roots. Before multiculturalism, labor unions throughout the West promoted strict immigration policies to protect workers against cheap “scab” labor. In the United States, Irish-born firebrand Denis Kearney called the Chinese immigrant a “cheap working slave.” There could be no compromise. In 1878 he said, “California must be all American or all Chinese” [1].

Europe’s social democratic parties pursued similar immigration restrictions. Harold Wilson’s government damaged Great Britain, but his Labour administration drafted a white paper in early 1965 that tried to curb immigration from Commonwealth countries. Had it been acted on, Enoch Powell’s “Rivers of Blood” speech three years later would have been unnecessary. In the 1970s, even the French Communist Party emphasized immigration control.

Sadly for the people of Sweden, their Social Democratic Party (SAP) lack the courage either to follow the Danes or to admit that their nation’s generous welfare state is on the brink of collapse due to unchecked immigration.

Journalist and former member of the Swedish Armed Forces, Kajsa Norman, discusses Sweden’s decline in her book Sweden’s Dark Soul, which was translated into English earlier this year. So far, it has received almost no press in the United States. The reason is obvious: Miss Norman exposes Sweden as an oppressive state of social democratic conformity that deals cruelly with dissenters. Miss Norman has a name for Sweden’s spiritual tyranny: the “Unimind.”

The book begins with Saturday, August 15, 2015. On that day, thousands of teenagers gathered inside Stockholm’s Kungstradgarden Park for the pop-music We Are Sthlm festival. Billed as a safe, family-friendly event, the day turned sour when hundreds of young men — the vast majority were Afghan and Somali immigrants — began molesting any girl they could find. They held down some of the victims and shoved fingers into their vaginas. The police and private security detained at least 90 suspects, but let them all go. A middle-aged police psychologist named Hans decided to send Dagens Nyheter, one of Sweden’s major publications, a first-hand account. Even though Hans saw that the perpetrators were foreigners, his initial email to the newspaper said nothing about race because he feared he would “be branded a racist” [2].

The story of the mass assaults was not made public until Saturday, January 9, 2016, nearly five months later. Fed up with the apathy of the mainstream media, Hans took his story to Chang Frick, an independent, Jewish-Gypsy journalist who first made a name for himself in 2013 by documenting riots in the immigrant-heavy suburb of Husby that the Swedish media ignored. Rioters shouted “Allahu Akbar!” and fought off firefighters with a hail of stones [3]. Mr. Frick’s Nyheter Idag not only broke the news on what had happened at the festival; it reported that authorities had been covering up We Are Sthlm assaults for at least a decade.

As Miss Norman writes, a few independent media outlets later noted other facts about mass immigration:

Young girls and women have been sexually assaulted in public swimming pools, parks, subways, and schools, and on buses. For many young people, this has been a part of everyday life, something one just has to learn to live with. In the 2016 Swedish Crime Survey, 14 per cent of 16- to 24-year-olds reported that they had been subjected to a sex offence [sic] that same year. In 2007, there were 12,563 reported sex offences [sic], including 4,749 rapes. By 2016, that number has grown to 20,284 reported sex offences [sic], including 6,715 rapes [4].

The mainstream media reacted by accusing Nyheter Idag of xenophobia. They tried to cast the story as one of police incompetence, noting correctly that Swedish police officials barred officers from investigating the crimes. Months before the same accusation became common in the United States, the Swedish establishment accused Mr. Frick and his website of being a mouthpiece for Russian disinformation [5].

This was not surprising coming from the elite media cartel. As Miss Norman points out, in Sweden, the media and the government have a close relationship dating back to the 1960s. Olof Palme, later to be murdered on the streets of Stockholm, spent his time as minister of education using television to “educate the population and convey the correct opinions” [6]. Between the 1960s and early 1990s, publicly owned television networks provided the bulk of news and entertainment to Swedes. Most programs championed left-liberal causes, from anti-colonial movements to feminism. And in Sweden, public shaming and ostracism — punishments typical of a feminized society — are very powerful.

In many respects, Sweden is not like other nations. Miss Norman writes that “according to research projects such as the World Values Survey (WVS), no other country deviates more from the global norm” [7]. Sweden is the least traditional country on Earth; in Sweden, extreme positions on sex equality, abortion, and families are common. The Swedish Unimind, which sees itself as the pinnacle of human achievement, does not permit deviation, but, as those who broke the silence about the We Are Sthlm assaults prove, the Unimind can be broken.

Sweden’s Dark Soul is less about collapse due to immigration and more about how, for almost 100 years, the Social Democrats created a false utopia and millions of citizen sycophants. It is a vivid demonstration of the problems of unchecked central power. The first Swedish centralizer, King Gustav Vasa (1496 – 1560), nationalized the Lutheran church [8] and created the first professional Swedish army and navy. This paved the way for the legendary Gustav II Adolf (Gustavus Adolphus) and the creation of the Swedish Empire. Until the late 19th century, long after the days of Swedish hegemony in the Baltic, “90 percent of Swedish taxes went to the Armed Forces” [9]. Statism, heavy taxation, and enforced opinions combined to create today’s Folkhemmet, or “people’s home.”

Swedes practiced collectivism long before the Social Democrats came to power in the 1930s, but it was the SAP that re-engineered Swedish society by giving power to left-wing technocrats. In 1934, racial hygiene laws were introduced to perform sterilizations on the mentally disabled, chronically ill, and those with “undesirable character traits” such as promiscuity, laziness, and alcoholism [10]. Alva and Gunnar Myrdal, who later won fame in Sweden promoting nuclear disarmament and the destruction of the nuclear family (Gunnar Myrdal also supervised the compilation of the hugely influential An American Dilemma), enthusiastically supported the sterilization of “anti-social” people [11].

After two decades of eugenics, the Swedish state decided to promote itself abroad as a “moral superpower.” A large part of this morality was an open immigration policy. In 1973, Sweden took in refugees from Chile after the military coup that ousted Salvador Allende. In 1979, thousands more entered Sweden from Iran after the fall of the Shah. Despite polls indicating that a plurality of Swedish citizens did not want more immigrants [12], the state decided to purge the country of “superstition and ignorance” [13]. In 1975, the Swedish Parliament wrote multiculturalism into law: “immigrants and minorities should decide for themselves to what extent they wished to be assimilated” [14].

Immigrants from Africa and the Middle East are four and three times, respectively, more likely to commit crimes than native-born Swedes [15]. Sweden has a higher percentage of foreign-born citizens than almost any other country in Europe, and rape, bombings, and shootings have become common. The “moral superpower,” which gave $550,000 in aid to the Viet Cong and $443 million to the African National Congress, is destroying itself.

As part of the Unimind, both the Social Democrats and the supposedly conservative Moderate Party parrot each other on the need to accept as many “migrants” as possible. The Unimind blames the patriarchy — not immigrants — for the rise in sex crimes. The Unimind believes that dismantling ancient Swedish tradition of free speech is more important than protecting the people or grappling with the truth. Sweden can be likened to a dictatorship of National Public Radio producers.

Sweden has become a nation of materialism, extreme egalitarianism, with a culture of shaming. Although Miss Norman does note that the Swedish mindset can turn quickly, and that the nationalist Swedish Democrats are winning more votes, Sweden’s Dark Soul reads like an epitaph. In the United States, if demographic change continues and the Democrats become as powerful as the SAP, we will become like Sweden, though far more violent.

U.S. Backlash #wingnut usbacklash.org

#IStandWithLaura — Conservatives Need To Boycott All Shitty Companies Who Cower To Teenage Nut-Job Loser Hitler Hogg

#IStandWithLaura — ALL conservatives need to support Laura Ingrahm and all conservatives in the media, and finally stand up to the bully tactics of the Democrat alt-left fascists, and their poster CHILD of hate.

WE’RE DONE FUCKING AROUND WITH THESE LOSER FUCKING COMPANIES WHO CONSPIRE WITH DEMOCRATS TO DESTROY CONSERVATIVES!!! IF THESE SHITTY COMPANIES WANT TO PLAY THAT DANGEROUS GAME THEN WE WILL ALSO WORK EVERYDAY TO DESTROY THE NUTLESS SHITTY COMPANIES!!

If you think that they are done after trying to destroy Laura Ingrahm, you are dead wrong. The Democrats fascists plan on attacking anyone who doesn’t hold the same radical and idiotic anti-American and anti-constitution views as the alt-left, and once they are done with Laura Ingrahm they will move on to their next conservative target. Just as they destroyed the career of Bill O’Reilly and others.

Write these companies on Twitter/Facebook and call them on the phone, and tell them to stop advertising on CNN or you will push a boycott of their company.

[list of 14 companies follows]

The companies above need to be targeted, attacked and completely destroyed online, including on conservative websites and especially on social media accounts. Everyone should tweet their anger aimed at these companies, and use the company’s social media handles so that the attacks show up in the company feeds.

The Democrats are using a teenage loser to attack conservatives, and if we allow this to continue there will be no conservatives left on TV.

We will not spend one fucking dime on any products or services provided by these shitty nutless pussy companies until they take out full-page ads to apologize to Laura Ingrahm and reinstate their advertising on her show!

We have already cancelled our Hulu membership, and will stop ordering all of our office products from shit-eating Office Depo, and will be very careful to not spend another fucking penny with the rest of the fucking loser companies on the list above — AND YOU SHOULD DO THE SAME!

Any other shitty companies who join the alt-left dickheads in attacking conservatives will be added to this list, and we will do everything in our power to destroy them as well.

#IStandWithLaura
In fact we will push hard for boycotting the advertisers of any shows that put David Hogg, who calls all NRA members “child murderers” on the air ever again.

And I hope David Hogg realizes that, for the rest of his miserable fucking life, he will never be able to have a job where he, and the company he works for, is not viciously and unmercifully attacked until Hogg loses the job or the company goes under. Companies beware!

We will start with the advertisers on CNN!

Stand Up To Government Corruption and Hypocrisy — usbacklash.org

Art Nickel #wingnut merriam-webster.com

Words can change and the people who used to use that as a derrogatory term for abolitionists are the Snowflakes of the 21st Century. Today it simply means a crybaby, snotnosed, Progressive Liberal Socialist Democrat (PLSD; see Urban Dictionary) or someone who has mass but no substance. A person who can't take the heat. A person who is a perpetual victim. And, worst of all, a person who believes in the economic slavery that is socialism, including welfare, public housing, and government-paid medical for all on the backs of those who work hard. Snowflakes, in perhaps the closest sense to the 1860s use, are also those who want to support all the world's rejects even when they don't come here legally and who recogize the only "religion" in the entire world that mimics Naziism in its desire to rule the world and its willingness to kill all who don't join in and worship allah.

yoyoofloco #fundie imdb.com

Today's liberal can only be matched to one time in world history. That would be the French Revolution. Matter of fact this is where the concept of the left came from. I think you know how fouled up these people were.

Speaking of stopping Hitler, as I sure you are well aware, Hitler and FDR went into power only four months apart. How many lives would have been save had Hitler been taken out in 1933 or 1934? Instead we fought a war over oil in the Pacific in 1941 with a weakened arm forces that had been allowed to decay. If history is allowed to repeat itself, we will see the same thing happen again.

You can rewrite history all you want to. If you think America or the colonies were liberal during the American Revolution you need to check your facts a bit. England was far more liberal than the colonies were at that time.

What prevented nuclear amageddon was the fact that both powers had nuclear weapons. Had the world been armed with conventional weapons, Europe and possibly the entire world might be under the Soviet Union now. (This would have made a lot of leftist happy, we certainly saw an example of this in South East Asia). There has been recent nuclear lately activity in both Iran and North Korea. Even though North Korea has actually tested a weapon and Iran is working on one, we have heard nothing from Green Peace. This explains the references to Green Peace and watermelons, green on the outside and red or yellow on the inside.

The way world history has worked is it swings back between being conservative and liberal. Conservatives makes the world stable enough so liberals can exist in it, as soon as the liberals take over, we go back into chaos and confusion. Then things fall apart again.

Thee_Bruno #fundie debbieschlussel.com

You can analyze the motivations of LIBERALS until the cows come home. It all boils down to the same Anti-American philosophy, and the same Anti-Freedom philosophy! LIBERALISM'S roots were spawned along with the rest of mankind's basest instincts - during the Dark Ages! (Communism and islam, just to name a couple.)

You can dissect, bisect, and tear apart every LIBERAL'S flawed arguments and they will still boil down to their Communist, America-hating, freedom-denying, liberty-hating, Totalitarianistic, simplistic propaganda.

The bottom line is this...and, once you fully understand this, it'll make your life less complicated......LIBERALS HATE AMERICA.....THEY ALWAYS HAVE, AND THEY ALWAYS WILL, AND THEY WILL STOP AT NOTHING UNTIL AMERICANS BOW DOWN AND WORSHIP AT THE ALTAR OF GOVERNMENT-SANCTIONED DEATH AS WAS PROMULGATED BY AMERICA'S ENEMIES DURING THE COLD WAR AND AS WE ARE STILL WITNESSING IN THE LANDS WHERE COMMUNISM AND ISLAM STILL DOMINATE!

LIBERALS HATE HITLER, BUT THEY ADORE AND WILL NEVER CRITICIZE LEFT-WING AND RELIGIOUS-CULT MASS MURDERERS SUCH AS: STALIN, POL POT, HO CHI MIHN, FIDEL CASTRO, CHAIRMAN MAO, DANIEL ORTEGA, HUGO CHAVEZ, IDI AMIN, ROBERT MUGABE, YASSER ARAFAT, AYATOLLAH KHOMENEI, HEZBOLLAH, HAMAS, OSAMA BIN LADEN, al-QAEDA, VLADIMIR PUTIN, LEONID BREZHNEV, NIKITA KRUSCHEV, CHE GUEVERA, MUQTADA AL-SADR, THE IRA, ISLAM, ETC., BECAUSE THOSE DESPOTS BELIEVE/BELIEVED IN THE SAME PHILOSOPHY THAT LIBERALS ESPOUSE - THE DEATH OF FREEDOM, THE DEATH OF DEMOCRACY, AND THE DEATH OF INDIVIDUAL LIBERTY!

LIBERALISM = THE DISEASE/RELIGION OF THE UNEDUCATED, THE LAZY, THE SPINELESS, THE INTOLERANT, THE IRRATIONAL, THE ANARCHIST, AND THE GULLIBLE LEFTIST!

LIBERALS HATE AMERICA....but they don't dare live anywhere else because they are...DARE WE SAY IT?....COWARDS!!

WE MUST ERADICATE THE LIBERAL, JUST AS WE MUST ERADICATE THE REST OF THE ENEMIES OF FREEDOM, LIBERTY, AND DEMOCRACY!

Phyllis Chesler #fundie meforum.org

<table>

It's become fashionable to draw comparisons between the popular television adaptation of Margaret Atwood's The Handmaid's Tale and Donald Trump's America.

It's become fashionable to draw comparisons between the popular television adaptation of Margaret Atwood's The Handmaid's Tale and Donald Trump's America.

Margaret Atwood, whose work I have long admired, is now being hailed as a prophet. It is quite the phenomenon. According to the pundits, Atwood's 1985 work, The Handmaid's Tale, which Mary McCarthy once savaged, and the recently-published 2019 sequel, The Testaments, are dystopias which aptly describe the contemporary climate change crisis, toxic environments, the rise in infertility, and the enslavement of women in Trump's America.

Is this all Atwood is writing about? Do the increasing restrictions on abortion in America parallel the extreme misogyny of Gilead, the theocratic state in Atwood's saga? Is the unjust separation of mothers and children, a la Trump on the southern border, what Atwood has foretold? Every review and interview with Atwood that I could find strongly insists that this is the case.

Michelle Goldberg, in the New York Times, attributes the current popularity of The Handmaid's Tale to Trump's ascendancy. She writes: "It's hardly surprising that in 2016 the book resonated—particularly women—stunned that a brazen misogynist, given to fascist rhetoric and backed by religious fundamentalists was taking power."

<table>

Gilead-inspired handmaid outfits have become popular at anti-Trump rallies as far away as Poland.

Gilead-inspired handmaid outfits have become popular at anti-Trump rallies as far away as Poland.

... At the anti-Trump pro-women's rights marches around the country, some feminist protesters dressed like Handmaids in billowing, shapeless red dresses, their facial identities obscured by large, white Victorian-era bonnets, carrying signs that read: "Make Margaret Atwood fiction again" and "The Handmaid's Tale is not an instruction manual."

They have a point. Abortion rights are being steadily challenged and nearly eviscerated in the formerly slave-owning American states. Right-to-life lawyers insist that the protection of unborn children without any gestational markers is the law of the land. We now have free states and slave states in terms of access to high quality, insurance-funded abortions. Pregnant, drug-addicted women are being jailed for child abuse.

<table>

Gilead most reflects what is happening not in America, but in most Islamic countries.

Gilead most reflects what is happening not in America, but in most Islamic countries.

However ... [t]here's another contemporary parallel that also gets scant attention. Gilead's system of pseudo-theocratic totalitarian control in both her novels and in the MGM/Hulu versions does not accurately reflect what is happening in America today; it mirrors what is happening in most Islamic countries, a fact that Atwood and her admirers are too politically correct to notice.

Obscuring one's individual identity, masking one's face, sequestering women at home, may have been true of many previous cultures and regimes. However, in this day forced niqabs (face veils) and burqas (head, face, and body bags) are mainly realities for women in Muslim countries and communities in the West. In Iran in July, three women were sentenced to a total of 55 years between them for protesting against the veil.

<table>

In July 2019, an Iranian court sentenced Yasaman Aryani (left), Monireh Arabshahi (center), and Mojgan Keshavarz to a total of 55 years in prison for protesting against the veil.

In July 2019, an Iranian court sentenced Yasaman Aryani (left), Monireh Arabshahi (center), and Mojgan Keshavarz to a total of 55 years in prison for protesting against the veil.

In The Handmaid's Tale Atwood does mention Islam twice (to exonerate Muslims as the suspected mass murderers of Congress, the Supreme Court, and the Oval Office in Gilead (p.174) and again in a reference to the "obsession with harems" on the part of allegedly Orientalist Western painters who did not understand that they were painting "boredom" (p.69). Atwood's quintessential Bad Guys are Caucasian, Bible-thumping, right wing, conservative, American Christians.

Where else but in the Islamic world do we see forced face veiling, forced child marriage, women confined to the home, polygamy (a "wife" and a "handmaid" under the same roof), male guardians and minders, cattle prod shocking, whipping, hand amputations, stoning, crazed vigilante mobs stomping and tearing people apart, and tortured corpses publicly displayed on city walls or hanging from cranes in order to terrify the populace? Or the torture murder of homosexuals? This is how Al-Qaeda, ISIS, Boko Haram, the Islamic Republics of Iran and Afghanistan, the tyrants of Somalia and Saudi Arabia, interpret, correctly or incorrectly, Sharia law.

How could all the reviewers not see what I so clearly see? Perhaps here's how.

I once lived in a harem in Afghanistan—a harem simply means the "women's quarters." It is forbidden territory to all men who are not relatives. If you can't leave without permission or without a male escort, you are in a harem and living in purdah.

<table>

"I once lived in a harem ... the property of a polygamous Afghan family."

"I once lived in a harem ... the property of a polygamous Afghan family."

After a 30-month courtship, I married the glamorous, wealthy, very Westernized, foreign student whom I first met at college when I was 18. We never once discussed religion. Not a word about Islam. He had not prepared me for what life would be like in his country, even temporarily. For example, he had never even mentioned that his father had three wives and 21 children, that most Afghan women still wore burqas or heavy hijab, that I would be pressured to convert to Islam, and would have to live with my mother-in-law.

When we landed in Kabul, officials smoothly removed my American passport—which I never saw again. Suddenly, I was the citizen of no country and had no rights. I had become the property of a polygamous Afghan family. I was not allowed out without a male escort, a male driver, and a female relative as my chaperones.

This marriage had transported me back to the 10th Century and trapped me there without a passport back to the future.

I experienced what it was like to live with people who were permanently afraid of what other people might think—even more so than in Small Mind Town, USA.

<table>

Read more about the author's captivity in Afghanistan in her acclaimed 2013 book.

Read more about the author's captivity in Afghanistan in her acclaimed 2013 book.

I was terrified when I first saw women wearing ghostly burqas—ambulatory body bags, sensory deprivation isolation chambers—huddled together literally at the back of the bus. My Afghan family laughed at my over-reaction, which was considered abnormal, not their practice of burying women alive.

My dreamer-of-a husband kept assuring me that the dreadful burqa and my captivity would both soon pass. He lived to see this dream come true for about 15 years for the middle classes until it was shattered again, perhaps forever.

Many Afghan women have mothers-in-law who beat them and treat them as despised servants. Mine never hit me or ordered me to cook or clean, but she tried to convert me to Islam every single day and tried to kill me by telling the servants to stop boiling my water and washing my fruits and vegetables. I got deathly ill.

Poor woman, she was a deserted and much maligned first wife. She feared me, envied me, hated me—as a woman, an infidel, a Jew, an American, and mainly, as a "love match," something considered too dangerously Western. Afghan mothers-in-law do collaborate in or even perpetrate the honor/horror killings of their daughters and daughters-in-law. So do rural India-based Hindu mothers and mothers-in-law, Muslim mothers and mothers-in-law world-wide, and Sikhs, to a lesser extent.

I got out of the wild, wild East and I moved on. But I never forgot the way it was. I always understood that as imperfect as America and the West might be, it was still a much better place for women than the Islamic world. Forever after, I understood that barbaric customs are indigenous, not caused by foreign intervention; and that, like the West, Islam was also an imperial and colonial power, owned slaves, and engaged in gender and religious apartheid.

I owe Afghanistan a great deal for teaching me this. Perhaps my radical Western feminism was forged long ago in pampered purdah in Kabul.

Islamic or Islamist totalitarianism today and as I knew it nearly 60 years ago in Kabul is the more obvious face of Gilead than the one imagined by Atwood more than 30 years ago.

Like the handmaids and domestics in Gilead, the captive population in Orwell's 1984 is monitored around the clock through "telescreens" that can view every room, each person. The telescreens broadcast Big Brother's orders and conduct daily "hate" sessions. People are always anxious and paranoid; everyone has permanent enemies.

Today, Orwell's Thought Police sound a lot like the Afghan Taliban or like Iran's or Saudi Arabia's Virtue­ and-Vice squads, who arrest men and women for the smallest sign of "individuality" or difference, and who harass and arrest women for showing a single strand of hair, or a glimpse of ankle. Here's Khaled Hosseini's fictional description of life in Afghanistan under the Soviets in The Kite Runner:

You couldn't trust anyone in Kabul anymore—for a fee or under threat, people told on each other, neighbor on neighbor, child on parent, brother on brother, servant on master, friend on friend...the rafiqs, the [Afghan] comrades, were everywhere and they'd split Kabul into two groups: those who eavesdropped and those who didn't...A casual remark to the tailor while getting fitted for a suit might land you in the dungeons of Poleh-charkhi...Even at the dinner table, in the privacy of their own home, people had to speak in a calculated manner—the rafiqs were in the classrooms too; they'd taught children to spy on their parents, what to listen for, whom to tell.

And here he is describing Afghanistan in the Taliban era:

In Kabul, fear is everywhere, in the streets, in the stadiums, in the markets, it is a part of our lives here...the savages who rule our watan [country] don't care about human decency. The other day, I accompanied Farzanajan to the bazaar to buy some potatoes and naan. She asked the vendor how much the potatoes cost, but he did not hear her, I think he had a deaf ear. So she asked louder and suddenly a young Talib ran over and hit her on the thighs with his wooden stick. He struck her so hard she fell down. He was screaming at her and cursing and saying the Ministry of Vice and Virtue does not allow women to speak loudly. She had a large purple bruise on her leg for days...If I fought, that dog would have surely put a bullet in me, and gladly!

Hosseini's descriptions are right out of 1984 or The Handmaid's Tale.

Two memoirs set in Iran, Azar Nafisi's best-selling Reading Lolita in Tehran and Roya Hakakian's Journey from the Land of No, describe the savage curtailment of private life and thought—and of life itself—by radical Islamists.

<table>

Two compelling accounts of life for women in Iran's Islamic Republic.

Two compelling accounts of life for women in Iran's Islamic Republic.

According to Nafisi, Khomeini's goon squads closed news­papers and universities and arrested, tortured, and executed beloved teachers, prominent artists, intellectuals, and activists, including feminists, and thousands of other innocent and productive Muslims. The squads constantly harassed women on the street and at work. If a woman failed the dress-code standards even slightly, or by accident, she risked being arrested, probably raped, probably executed.

In Journey from the Land of No, Roya Hakakian describes the in­describable "Mrs. Moghadam," the newly-installed head of the Jewish girls' high school. Mrs. Moghadam tyrannizes, terrifies, and shames the Jewish girls. She tries to convert them to Islam. However, her true passion is more Talibanesque. She informs the innocent girls that, although they do not know it, they are "diabolical," "abominable," "loathsome," "lethal," capable of "drowning everything in eternal dark­ness," capable of bringing the "apocalypse" by showing a single strand of hair. To Hakakian's credit, she presents a rather dangerous turn of events as a dark comedy.

Mrs. Moghadam is definitely an Aunt Lydia, the lead female tormentor of the Handmaids, right out of Gilead, circa 1985.

<table>

Many Western feminists mistakenly see the face veil and head scarf as symbols of anti-racism.

Many Western feminists mistakenly see the face veil and head scarf as symbols of anti-racism.

As Muslim women are being tortured, honor-murdered by their families, or stoned to death, sometimes for refusing to wear the veil, many Western multiculturally and politically correct post-colonial feminists are deconstructing and wearing the face veil and the head scarf as symbols of anti-racism and as a form of respect when they visit Muslim countries. Such feminists are also silencing and demonizing all other views in academic journals, in the media, and on feminist internet groups.

I've written about this many times. Therefore, while I know that violence against women still remains a burning issue in the West, I agree with Allison Pearson's recent article in The Spectator: "The appalling vanity of Western Feminists who think Margaret Atwood writes about them."

Atwood depicts an all-female power structure in which the handmaids are kept in line by cruel female "Aunts," led by Aunt Lydia, who casually apply cattle prods and tasers, who blame them as evil sluts, punish them with group condemnation, bouts of solitary confinement, exile them to the "Colonies" to die cleaning up toxic waste, etc. Such behavior seems to contradict feminist views of women as morally superior to men and as more compassionate and intuitive.

<table>

Aunt Lydia (left) and the al-Khansa Brigade of ISIS

Aunt Lydia (left) and the al-Khansa Brigade of ISIS

Like men, women are human beings and as such are as close to the apes as to the angels. Women are also aggressive, cruel, competitive, envious, sometimes lethally so, but mainly toward other women. I would not want to be at the mercy of a female prison guard—or a female concentration camp guard—in the West. But let's not forget the Wives of ISIS—the all-femaleal-Khansaa Brigade who whipped, beat, and mutilated the breasts of girls and women when their heavy black burqas slipped. Displaced ISIS women continue their anti-woman reign of terror.

Misogynist thinking and actions exist in America today but not only among right-wing conservatives. It is also flourishing among our media and academic elites. Such thinking is flying high under the banner of "free speech," "multi-cultural relativism," "anti-racism," and "political correctness." Dare to question this elite's right to silence and shame those who challenge their views—i.e., that the West is always to blame, that jihadists are freedom-fighters, that the Islamic face veil is a free choice or a religious commandment, that polygamy encourages sisterhood, that Islam is a race, not a religious and political ideology—and, as I've noted many times, one is attacked as a racist, an Islamophobe, and a conservative, and swiftly demonized and de-platformed.

While MGM/Hulu's TV series is dramatically compelling, part soap opera, part horror movie, part Warrior Queen fantasy, the series is radically different from Atwood's 1985 novel. For example, Atwood's narrator, Ofglen, is not an increasingly daring, crazed, female assassin, as Elizabeth Moss brilliantly plays her. She is hardly heroic at all; under totalitarianism, heroism, collective or individual, is quickly ferreted out and destroyed. It exists but is rare.

Contemporary viewers are hungry for multi-racial characters, interracial and same-sex couples, "badass" women. Hulu gives them to us. Hulu's Canada is a multi-racial, politically correct refuge for Gilead's escapees; same-sex couples and feminists are government leaders. This is not true in the novel. On the contrary, in her 1985 Epilogue, Atwood has Canada rounding up and returning all Gilead escapees.

<table>

Media and academic elites are playing partisan politics with Atwood's original vision.

Media and academic elites are playing partisan politics with Atwood's original vision.

Atwood the divine novelist is absolutely entitled to depict whatever she wishes. But the current crop of reviewers as well as the filmmakers are playing partisan politics with her original vision and are refusing to see other and larger global dangers contained in her work.

Women's freedom and women's lives worldwide are under the most profound siege. To focus solely on the United States or on the Caucasian, Judeo-Christian West is diversionary. It scapegoats one country, one culture, for the far greater crimes of other countries and cultures.

Phyllis Chesler, a Shillman-Ginsburg Fellow at the Middle East Forum, is an emerita professor of psychology and women's studies and the author of eighteen books, including Women and Madness, Woman's Inhumanity to Woman, An American Bride in Kabul, and A Politically Incorrect Feminist.

Notes:

[1]Commercial surrogacy has been outlawed in India, Thailand, parts of Mexico, Malaysia, and South Africa, as well as in many European countries including Austria, Belgium, France, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, and the UK. Hence, the campaign to legalize commercial surrogacy in America has gathered momentum.

[2] Contemporary surrogacy has now become a way of slicing and dicing biological motherhood into three parts: an egg donor, who undergoes painful and dangerous IVF procedures; a "gestational" mother who faces all the risks of pregnancy, childbirth, and potentially negative and lifelong medical and psychiatric consequences; and an adoptive mother or father. This vivisection of motherhood makes it impossible for a birthmother to win custody for any reason.

al_Mulazem #conspiracy forums.military.com

he is just another conservative news hater. Fox News is the only network that gives the benefit of the doubt to the military. All other networks jump on any story that might discredit the military and the war effort

FOX NEWS..FAIR BALANCED PRO AMERICAN AND PRO MILITARY.
CNN MSNBC- LIBERAL, LEFT WING, COMMUNIST ANTI MILITARY AND ANTI WAR EFFORT

Muslim_Acid_Salesman #fundie reddit.com

Liberals view Islam as the lost proletariat that will fight against the West. They view Muslims as the disenfranchised group of brown people that will fight against the United States. Despite the fact that they are the most conservative people on Earth (They hate gays, women and minorities) liberals will ally with them for the sake of anti-Americanism and anti-capitalism.
As an atheist and a conservative, I'm sick of hearing excuses by liberals apologizing for far-wing conservative Islamic values. The culture of Islamic countries are anti-liberal.

The "If You Have to Ask" Award

The answer's probably "yes"

David J. Stewart #fundie davidjstewart.blogspot.com

Am I Too Conspiratorial?

I once received an e-mail from one of my website guests which said I was too conspiratorial. As always, I am thankful to my web visitors for their opinions and I am open-minded to any constructive criticism. I am not going to be critical of my guest, not at all. I simply would like to address this issue of being "too conspiratorial" because I believe others may be feeling the same. I have so much to say to you in this dark hour. Please hear me out. Here goes...

I do a lot of reading. When I was younger, I was your typical person who didn't take serious notice of the U.S. Constitution or the Bill of Rights. I couldn't have told you what my rights were if my life had depended upon it. I thought the government was good, judges were all honest and authority was never to be questioned. I had been taught that Republicans were good, and Democrats were bad. As I grew older, I was still your typical person who really didn't care to concern myself with other people's problems. The scandals and government corruption I was hearing about really didn't phase me. I just didn't care one way or the other.

By the way, I was a saved Christian the whole time. I was saved at the age of thirteen. I did care about the things of God, but I felt that anything dealing with the world's problems was their own dilemma, not mine. I would continually vote "Republican" simply because they claimed to be against abortion (what a bunch of liars). In my mind, Republicans were decent conservative people and Democrats were all left-wing liberals. In part, this was because of whitewashing schemes (such as the all-American image painted over Ronald Reagan's presidency to hide his war crimes and betrayal of the American people). I was an idiot, just like many people still are today. Thank God, I woke up!

Before I go any further, I have to make this statement because it is so good. It is a statement by Thomas Jefferson.

"The man who reads nothing is better educated than the man who reads nothing but newspapers."

That is so true! If all you ever do is read the newspaper and listen to the TV, you're going to be a brainwashed fool. Sadly, most people form their opinions based upon information they heard from the TV. I said earlier that I read a lot. I have spent countless thousands-of-dollars for books in my lifetime. I have read many books, searched many websites, watched many videos, and listened to many sermons. I am shocked (to say the least) about the things I have learned. The more I learn, the more I realize how much I don't know. I can honestly say that the average person today is woefully ignorant of the truth about so many things. Even worse, they don't care! They are like I was years ago. God help us!

As I mentioned, I had always voted Republican because I thought they were against abortion. They lied to the public. Then one day I realized that abortion has remained legal ever since it was federally legalized in the early 1970's. Whether a Democrat or Republican has been in The White House hasn't made a difference, abortion has continued. The Republicans haven't even made a small ripple in the abortion industry. Yes, I say industry. Did you know that the abortion industry SELLS the babies' body parts for money? For $800.00 you can buy an aborted baby's brain. This is no conspiracy theory, it is a documental fact.

Am I too conspiratorial? Let's take a look at the dictionary meaning of a "conspiracy."

Based upon these definitions, we are living in a cesspool of conspiracies. Now let me ask you a question, especially if you claim to be a Christian. How are we supposed to respond to these "conspiracies?" Though most people would like to dismiss them as "conspiracy theories," that is not what God wants us to do about them. We need to look into these matters. Do you know what the smallest Bible in the world is? It is the Bible that most believers live. It is the few pet verses that many believers center their life around, but they never see the other Scriptures in the Bible. You can't just live your life friend on the portions of God's Word that you feel comfortable with. You must obey all of God's Word. There is a verse in the Old Testament which reads...

"Who will rise up for me against the evildoers? or who will stand up for me against the workers of iniquity?"
-Psalm 94:16

I've based much of my website ministry upon this verse. You see friend, part of being a Christian is standing up for what is right. Ephesians 5:11 commands believers to refute (Greek, elencho, meaning, "to expose") all works of darkness. Our duty as Christians is to speak out against evil and the workers of iniquity, and to expose Satan's works of darkness. If the truth offends them, so be it! I value your soul more than I do your friendship.

I admire Pastor Roy Thompson who used to pastor the Cleveland Baptist Church in Ohio for decades. He had a big sign out in front of his church that said, "Abortion is Murder!" Would to God more believers had that type of zeal for truth and righteousness. To our shame (as believers), there are unsaved people doing more to protect our freedoms than we are. Freedom isn't free. Liberty doesn't just happen. The problem is simple... people WON'T CARE until they lose their liberty and freedom, or their children. Oh, then they'll care! What will it take to wake you up?

How about having TSA stick their hands down your pants and grab your genitals?

Erik Rush #fundie wnd.com

It is improbable that the framers of the Constitution anticipated a situation in which the press were entirely given over to seditious, anti-American policies. If they had, it is likely that their modus operandi would be similar to that for any faction found guilty of high crimes. Trials for treason and the requisite sentences would apply, and I would have no qualms about seeing such sentences executed, no matter how severe.
...
Those whose speech and actions impinge upon the God-given rights set forth in the Declaration of Independence and codified in the Constitution are, by definition, excepted from protection under the First Amendment (as well as the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment). This is a very important concept to consider, because it is based on these presumptions of protected speech and equal protection for all that progressives and socialists have engaged in their predation upon our liberties.

If these truths can be acknowledged and widely accepted as such (as opposed to progressives’ Orwellian interpretations), then the political disenfranchisement of liberals, progressives, socialists and Marxists can begin in earnest, and in the open.

John Hawkins #fundie townhall.com

There may be no official rule book for being a liberal, but that doesn't mean there aren't rules. There are actually quite a few rules liberals go by and the more politically active liberals become, the more rigidly they tend to stick to their own code of behavior. These rules, most of which are unspoken, are passed along culturally on the Left and viciously enforced. Ironically, many liberals could not explain these rules to you and don't even consciously know they're following them. So, by reading this article, not only will you gain a better understanding of liberals, you'll know them better than they know themselves in some ways.

1) You justify your beliefs about yourself by your status as a liberal, not your deeds. The most sexist liberal can think of himself as a feminist while the greediest liberal can think of himself as generous. This is because liberals define themselves as being compassionate, open minded, kind, pro-science and intelligent not based on their actions or achievements, but based on their ideology. This is one of the most psychologically appealing aspects of liberalism because it allows you to be an awful person while still thinking of yourself as better than everyone else.

2) You exempt yourself from your attacks on America: Ever notice that liberals don't include themselves in their attacks on America? When they say, "This is a racist country," or ",This is a mean country," they certainly aren't referring to themselves or people who hold their views. Even though liberals supported the KKK, slaughtering the Indians, and putting the Japanese in internment camps, when they criticize those things, it's meant as an attack on everyone else EXCEPT LIBERALS. The only thing a liberal believes he can truly do wrong is to be insufficiently liberal.

3) What liberals like should be mandatory and what they don't like should be banned: There's an almost instinctual form of fascism that runs through most liberals. It's not enough for liberals to love gay marriage; everyone must be forced to love gay marriage. It's not enough for liberals to be afraid of guns; guns have to be banned. It's not enough for liberals to want to use energy-saving light bulbs; incandescent light bulbs must be banned. It's not enough for liberals to make sure most speakers on campuses are left-wing; conservative speakers must be shouted down or blocked from speaking.

4) The past is always inferior to the present: Liberals tend to view traditions, policies, and morals of past generations as arbitrary designs put in place by less enlightened people. Because of this, liberals don't pay much attention to why traditions developed or wonder about possible ramifications of their social engineering. It’s like an architect ripping out the foundation of a house without questioning the consequences and if the living room falls in on itself as a result, he concludes that means he needs to make even more changes.

5) Liberalism is a jealous god and no other God may come before it: A liberal "Christian" or "Jew" is almost an oxymoron because liberalism trumps faith for liberals. Taking your religious beliefs seriously means drawing hard lines about right and wrong and that's simply not allowed. Liberals demand that even God bow down on the altar of liberalism.

Jpatt #fundie conservapedia.com

You'll notice the progression of monkeys below the progression of liberal man. The box represents life in the present times. You'll notice liberal man began as a monkey. Over time, liberal monkey man walks on two feet. Liberal man sheds his monkey days and grows into the present day man. The liberal future holds that man adapts over time, almost a more sleek, lean frame. Clearly it appears that the brain is growing during this period. As well, a wing bone emerges from his backside. Also, you'll notice the absence of the monkey below future liberal man. In the future, all beasts have become extinct due to overpopulation of the human species. The last progression of the liberal man, millions of years into the liberal future, wings and feathers. Man evolves into flight to escape, to flee other mankind so as not to become food. So, you believe in Evolution?!? Tell me another funny story

asderathos #fundie asderathos.deviantart.com

Impeach Barack Hussein Obama
by Asderathos
i
86
-UPDATE-
***********************************************
not all that is legal is just - We must find a candidate of honor by 2012 [NO not Glenn Beck or Sarah Palin]
***********************************************


-OLDE-
_______________________________________

The SPIRIT of the Constitution Has been Violated
_______________________________________

Violation of Rights To Life Liberty & the Pursuit of Happiness etc
___

Life - Abortion (& partial Birth Abortion) IE Infanticide

Liberty - Centralized Govt is a violation of state's rights,

Pursuit of Happiness - Affirmative Action, Taxation without representation (fed taxes in particular),

Freedom of Religion - Public religious displays & prayer in school are banned in some places (ITS NOT FREEDOM FROM)
___

2nd amendment was violated for Years in DC gun ban
___

_______________________________________________

but the Socialist outrages, destruction of what's left of the constitution, & Ivory Tower Socialist Professor Policies
will eventually come home to roost.

Administrator of Rapture Ready #fundie rr-bb.com

Rule #13

13] No Liberal Left Wing Political Agendas, Tax Dodging, Anti-American Conspiracies, Anti-War Propaganda, or that the United States is Israel or Mystery Babylon. This message board is conservative in line with the classical interpretation of scripture in that we uphold God's Word as the literal final authority on all matters. The Political forum is for discussing issues from a Christian viewpoint, not for plugging a favorite candidate.

Rose City Antifa #fundie newsweek.com

A man assaulted by Antifa supporters in a video that went viral following a demonstration against a far-right rally in Portland, Oregon, says he is not a fascist but a Bernie Sanders-supporting progressive and registered Democrat.

On August 4, Portland-based far-right group Patriot Prayer rallied at the city’s Tom McCall Waterfront Park. But it was opposed by a larger number of counter-demonstrators from various left-wing and liberal groups in the city.

Footage shows Paul Welch, 38, wrestling with masked anti-fascists for possession of the American flag he brought to the counter-demo. They demanded he let go of the flag, calling it a “fascist symbol,” reported The Oregonian.

"The right and certainly a lot of smaller groups like Patriot Prayer might rush to things like the flag and try to take it up as, 'This is our symbol exclusively,'" Welch, a protest regular, told The Oregonian. "Part of my thinking was to take it back."

One of the men in the video beats Welch on the legs with a club-like object before striking him on the head with it. Welch is left bleeding on the floor, holding his head, as his assailants calmly walk off.

He feared he would be beaten to death but was taken to hospital by onlookers and his head gash stapled back together by doctors. Welch, who said he voted for socialist Sanders in the 2016 Democratic primary, was also concussed.

[...]

Rose City Antifa, the anti-fascist group in Portland, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Jesus4mankind #fundie uk.youtube.com

Morally-normal people gain nothing good by heeding sodomite ideas. Sodomites lack all respect due to their immoral homosexuality stain. Liberalism is a vice: Destroying economic freedom by stealing from workers and subverting a nation's body politic. Liberalism is toxic sleeping-gas from the socialistic left. Libertarianism is watered-down liberalism (Kool-Aid). Also, fag-males have XY chromosomes and fag-females have XX. Show the location and composition of the "gay gene sequence".

WhiteCSA #racist stormfront.org

Yes I've noticed this about White Liberals. Many of those people are "Liberals" but have no association with the Ghetto. Not only in terms of education but living. Many people live in the "Country" or rural areas but still be Liberals.

That's because these people only act like Liberals but in reality share our racial views. The difference is we admit being White Nationalist. The White Liberals are pretty much cowards and afraid of being Politically Incorrect and being called a Racist.

That must change because America's changing. The White Race will be a minority in the US in only a few years. I'm not talking about White Conservatives, Liberals, Libertarians, National Socialists, Socialists, Moderates, Communists, Normies, and White Christians. I'm talking about WHITE PEOPLE. We're all in it together. WPWW !

Jim #fundie blog.jim.com

Whosover wants to overthrow Assad of Syria, wants to murder all Alawites and murder or expel all Christians. There used to be a moderate opposition, composed entirely of do-gooder employees of “NGOs”, which is to say, employees of the State Department, but they all got out when things went bad, and are now employed on various do-gooder international grants all over the world, such as settling Somali refugees on middle American marginal electorates in flyover country. The opposition to Assad is now 100% head chopper Muslim. The Cathedral delusively imagines it can regain control once they have finished chopping off heads.

Whosoever wants to overthrow Assad of Syria, wants to ally with people unlike me, to murder people who are like me, to murder them for what they have in common with me. Murdering some people who are like me, murdering them because they are like me is a step towards murdering everyone like me.

It is striking that the advocates of reason, rationality, niceness, and maximizing everyone’s utility always wind up with pyramids of skulls. The French revolution was in large part a creation of the cult of reason, and I see the same evil and madness in today’s rationalist community, for example the Bay Area rationalist community, whose rationality is strikingly and conspicuously limited by their refusal to engage in thoughtcrime and their demented demonization of thought criminals.

Recall the Populares of Rome. “Populares” is latin for “Democrats”, or “People’s Party”. In the end they allied with the Samnites. I suppose the Populares wanted to give the Samnites citizenship and fairer treatment, because that is the kind of moldy bananas the Populares stood for, being nice to people, especially the oppressed, remedying justice and inequality, rationality, reason, and reasonableness, all that filthy disgusting garbage. The Samnites, however, wanted to overthrow the walls of Rome, kill every Roman male, and rape every fertile age Roman woman. The Populare/Samnite alliance strikingly resembles today’s progressive/Muslim alliance.

The fans of kindness, niceness, pleasantness, reason, and rationality tend to wind up quite unreasonably and unpleasantly torturing and murdering very large numbers of people. Hostility to near is a key foundational principle of leftism, goes down all the way to friends, family, and political allies.

War with Syria is war on the side of Jews against the side of Christians, since Assad is keeping Syrian Christians alive, and Israel is backing the side that wants Assad (and Christians) dead. I don’t think this is a matter of the Zionist Occupation Government ruling the world. Rather it is that the Cathedral, though it hates Israel, or rather hates Israel being Jewish, wants a non Jewish Israel, hates Christians even more. The Cathedral is allied with Israel the state, but there is a point of contention, since they cannot stand Israel being Jewish or India being Hindu, any more than they can stand America being Christian. Israel the state wants Syria the state in chaos, and the Cathedral wants to rule Syria and imagines it can rule through the head choppers. Were they to actually succeed in ruling through head choppers, Israel the state would find itself under a lot heavier pressure to become less Jewish, but the Israelis doubt that this outcome is very likely.

Trump’s attack on Syria was both real and fake – real enough to threaten Assad and Putin, real enough to get his judge through the senate, real enough to keep the Pentagon on his side, fake enough to avoid war with Assad and Putin. What is clear is that the left wants to overthrow Assad. If we continue to take substantial measures to overthrow Assad, then Trump will have cucked out to the left as the Czar did, which I think will likely be the death of Trump and his family, as it was the death of the Czar and his family. Any concessions to the left are just blood in the water. They are more likely to kill you if you play nice with them than if you piss on them.

When Obama took power, we were involved in two pointless unwinnable wars in the middle east, where we supporting the side that could perhaps be argued to be the good guys, though it was far from clear who the good guys were.

When Obama had governed for eight years, he had gotten us into five more pointless unwinnable wars in the middle east, where we are for the most part supporting sides that are appallingly evil and indiscriminately murderous.

When I say unwinnable, it is not that we lack the capacity to defeat a bunch of backward goat herders. It is that we lack the capacity to defeat a bunch of backward goat herders when our troops are required to behave like heavily armed nursemaids, and when I say pointless, I mean that the victory condition is defined as our enemies liking us, rather than our enemies being dead or enslaved. If you forbid our troops to kill civilians that are intermixed with our enemies, our enemies will grasp civilians to their chests. If you applied the the old laws of war, which allowed you to flatten enemy cities and such like, civilians would separate themselves from combatants, and combatants would have no reason to prevent them from doing so.

And now Trump is under extreme pressure to bring us into war with Syria, North Korea, Russia, and China, and may well be cucking out under that pressure, bringing us from seven low level wars in five of which we are allied to the bad guys, to eleven wars, in three of which we will be the bad guys, and two of them likely to go thermonuclear.

Why is it that the fans of niceness and rationality tend to be unpleasant and irrational, from the Bay Area Rationalist community to the Khmer Rouge?

It is because caring for your children, your spouse, your lover, your sisters, your brothers, and your friends is likely to be expensive and inconvenient. Caring for far away people located in places you cannot find on the map tends to be a whole lot cheaper and much more convenient.

And thus it is no surprise that Badwhites look after their children, their spouses, their kin, their lovers, and their friends, while Goodwhites do not look after their children, their spouses, and their kin, and routinely stab lovers and friends in the back. Often stab kin in the back also – observe what happens when the old man dies, and fights over the inheritance break out. Leftists lie, betray, and sometimes murder, in order to rob their brothers and sisters, sometimes even their parents and their children.

Can you imagine one of ours suckerpunching an Obama supporter to the enthusiastic cheers of everyone who voted against Obama? Reflect on the Yellow Hat incident – the video shows yellow hat being sucker punched, presumably because he formerly wore a Trump hat. There is just no way that could happen on our side. Nasty goings on when inheritance is being distributed always involve lefties behaving ruthlessly to close kin. Normal people generally cooperate with close kin. The rubbish and destruction left after left wing protests, as compared to the neatness and order of right wing protests. It is not like a ten percent greater likelihood of littering and vandalism, it is a thousand fold greater likelihood of littering and vandalism.

Lord Howe arranged for his men to die. The Victorian anti slaver movement committed perjury in court. Who kills commies? Commies kill commies. It is totally and completely one sided. Nazis, right wing dictators, right wing death squads kill hardly any commies by comparison. It is not like there is a ten percent greater tendency to murder their own, it is more like a thousand fold greater tendency to murder their own.

Would our people have produced something like the “10:10 no pressure” video?

The moral difference between lefties and normies is as clear as the trail of rubbish that they leave in their path.

Hostility to near is a key foundational principle of leftism, goes down all the way to friends, family, and political allies. Hence Lord Howe. If your commanding officer is a leftist and he orders you into danger, desert.

Leftism as an individual propensity is a propensity to game the systems for status, affiliation, alliance formation, and virtue signaling. Leftism as a movement is large scale organized gaming of the status, affiliation, and virtue signaling systems, and thus tends to work to the disadvantage of individual leftists. No friends to the right, no enemies to the left, means all your friends are your enemies and all your enemies are your friends, hence the greatest danger to leftists as members of a leftist movement is being murdered by their own movement.

If you are genuinely decent and conscientious, you are substantially less interested in cheap signals of decency and conscientiousness. Decent conscientious people are not attracted to whatever opinions are high status. People who want cheap ways of signaling decency and conscientiousness are attracted towards whatever opinions are high status.

Thus, observe …

Citizenfitz #racist realjewnews.com

A Jewish-English dictionary: what Jews say - and what Jews are REALLY saying.

Antisemite: Someone Jews hate
Freedom: Depravity
Equality: Gross favoritism
Tolerance: Debauchery
Holocaust: The holy cash cow
Holocaust denial: Blasphemy

Freedom of speech: Shut up, Nazi!
Hate speech: Words Jews hate
Race: Something that exists only in the minds of racists
Racist: A White person
Racism: A mantra used to program liberals

Liberal: Schmuck
Liberalism: Schmuck farming
Social justice: Cultural Marxism
Civil rights: Run-up to multiculturalism
Multiculturalism: Nation wrecking

Feminism: Home wrecking
Gay marriage: Society wrecking
Gay rights: Disease propagation
Teenagers: A mob of criminally violent Blacks
Hater: Right winger
Right winger: (See “hater”)

Conspiracy theorist: Someone who’s on to the Jews
Right wing extremist: Anyone Jews hate
Left wing extremist: Freedom fighter
Justice: Jewish scheming
Injustice: Resisting Jewish scheming

Zionism: Scheme for Jewish world rule
Communism: Scheme for achieving Zionism
Democracy: Scheme for national Jew rule
Republicanism: Scheme for local Jew rule
Republicans: Useful idiots
Democrats: Very useful idiots

Gentile: Sub-human
Goyim: Sub-animal
Negro/Schwarza: Sub-goyim
Christian Zionist: Imbecile
Antisemitic canard: Indisputable truth

Ron #fundie latimes.com

It seems there was 1 candid honest student post. "" I knew this was going to happen sooner or later. With the "Bush Is A Terrorist" posters around his room, and his propaganda filled lectures,"" The other alleged students are already brainwashed and indoctrinated in far Left radicalism. Those posts eerily sound like they they were all made by the same person OR a Robotic Clone. Did some one dictate what to say? Perhaps the teacher himself posted at least a few f those in favor of himself. Out schools are full of far left radical Socialist, Marxists and far left Liberals.

Peter Furman #conspiracy wnd.com

Obama is a tyrant,a narcissist,a megalomaniac,a Constitutional,Federal and Civil criminal who has/is attempting a "coup" in America!

The acknowledged dumbest thing you can do,the Holy Grail if you have no other option than to fight is "Never,Ever fight a war on two fronts at the same time!

Hitler would have won if he didn't go to war with the Allies and the Russians at the same time. Bush made the imbecilic mistake of going to war in both Iraq and Afghanistan at the same time.This act resulted in an economic implosion,a worldwide collapse,the election of Obama,the tyrant,the Socialist,the Totalitarian,the criminal,the dictator,the evisceration of the Constitution and the concept of "Limited Government",the cornerstone of Freedom,Opportunity,a viable,powerful economy the "Engine" which drives everything the millions and millions of "legal" immigrants came here to embrace.

Obama is the result of 50+ years of an exponentially corrupt,amoral,destructive shift away from the very foundation which made us great. One corrupt President after another usurping the purpose,the reason they are sworn to do. The President,every member of the Three Branches of Government takes a solemn oath to honor has been "violated",abused,perverted for power,money,a sociopaths need to control to destroy the very people he/she is sworn to "Serve". Johnson,Nixon,Clinton.all committed impeachable,tyrannical crimes yet None was held accountable for betraying,taking,stealing,lying,killing,eviscerating the Constitution and the Constitutional Republic,the Freedom,the opportunity,the American Dream turned Nightmare by them,against the people,against the law,the ethics,the sacrifice so many made!

This Failure of the system,of "checks and balances",of the responsibility they took has led to exponentially greater abuse,crime by each Chief Executive,each Congress,the entire Political and electoral system as it became apparent that they would "Skate" from the justice,the punishment they deserved.

Assassination,grand larceny,bribery,extortion,the crimes they committed.the deals,the betrayals,the imbecilic programs paid for with Taxpayer money via a contract with government looted,a ponzi scheme all of which are bankrupt,failed,taking with them the quality of life we once had.

Obama,Biden,Pelosi,Reid,the agencies,the Czars,the circumvention of Congress,the sheer number of High Crimes and Misdemeanors that brought us here must END.

Those who committed them and found liable need to feel the full fury of the American People,the full fury of the Judicial system,no deals,no immunity,no easy time,no probation,no options just the punishment for what they have done and so,the next Obama will have to think twice or face the same fate these provocateurs
,these morally and ethically empty,these parasites vacuous takers of Life,Liberty and our way of life will serve as a warning,to serve as a union of all that so many suffered to accomplish,fought and died to create and protect will NEVER be forgotten,taken again!

"Live Free Or Die" "Never Forget"!

Daniel Greenfield #fundie sultanknish.blogspot.com

Now Europe has been going demographically bankrupt for awhile now because of its falling birth rates, so the socialists who run it have come up with an absolutely amazing plan, which socialist plans can't possibly fail. They're going to solve this demographic bankruptcy and this resulting economic bankruptcy when there's nobody to do the work or pay the bills or even write the welfare checks by bringing in millions and millions of Muslims to fill the gap. So you're going to have people from high birth rate countries come in, and they're going to be at the very bottom of the pyramid.

[...]

There's just one, tiny, little, minor problem with it, and I'm not talking about the terrorism, the Sharia, the no-go zones, the attacks on Jews, or all the other fun stuff. There's just one other minor problem, which is that the people coming in don't actually work. [...] They don't want to work, and why should they want to work? Because there's a basic cultural difference between Europe, between the West, and Islam, the Muslim world. Europe, the West, we're a work ethic culture. We believe in working. We believe in coming home and saying okay, honey, what did you do? I worked 8 hours a day. That's great. The Muslim world, it does not work like that because the Muslim world is a slave culture. We're in the south now. We're in Charleston. [...] Even the people who aren't at the top [in Muslim countries] believe that work is something you're punished with. It's not something you want to do, and socialists, by the way, believe the same thing. Work isn't a good thing. It's something you have to be forced to do.

This is a slave culture, and in the slave culture when people come into a country where it has generous socialism, that has generous welfare policies, they're coming there not to work. In fact, you have the whole idea that these people are refugees. They are not refugees. [...] They are economic migrants. [...] Why are they all headed there [to Europe]? Welfare.

[...]

We can't allow our United States to go that route. We can't allow refugee resettlement to fill our cities, to fill our towns with people who are supposed to be our future, who we are told are going to do the work that we don't want to do. Socialism is the underlying problem here. The migration we're seeing is caused by socialism. It's caused by left-wing policies, and now the left wing as it always does manages to make a crisis that they caused even worse. [...] If we don't recover the birth rate, if we don't fundamentally change the demographics, we're going to go the way of Europe.

'Coach' Dave Daubenmire #fundie youtube.com

I, I, I finished yesterday's show with something that I think is, is, is uh was pretty profound, infact the Lord worked, worked on me all day yesterday. The whole idea that Liberal and Left are not the same thing, they're not the same thing.

Leftism, Leftism, think about this. People would call someone like me a fundamentalist. "He's a right-wing fundamentalist." When's the last time you've heard them say 'left-wing fundamentalist'? When's the last time you've heard them identify something as a 'left-wing fundamentalist'? Now don't, don't please don't, THANK GOD STEPHEN HAWKING'S DEAD, thank God. Is that is that date, not date, yeah Stephen Hawking has been?

[Yeah.]

Hey listen, I'm sorry. I hope he found the Lord, but, hey. He ain't an atheist any more. Hey, he ain't an atheist any more!

[He, he didn't find the Lord.]

Yeah. Yeah, well, so good. I don't cry, I mean, I don't cry. SORRY! I signed on. So, if I'm a 'right-wing fundamentalist', is there such a thing as a 'left-wing fundamentalist'?

IMHO #fundie disqus.com

IMHO:
The American flag and the queer flag stand for the same thing. Empowerment and equality of deviant God haters.

Canis Vulpes:
The American flag stands for the country of The United States of America.
The LGBT flag stands for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered people.
So no, not the same thing.

IMHO:
Perhaps you should study on that a little more. The Constitution guarantees the rights of the deviant left and since this is a democracy then they can hold office and push whatever legislation they want. Now we have an openly homo running for president who will be seeking more "rights" for the deviants.
You may say that they should have equal rights too. But they are not making equal rights, they are seeking favor by taking away CHRISTIAN rights. The right to associate is the most basic right of religion and they started taking that away early on with their socialist legislation and taxation to pay for it. Now they want to teach "alternate" sex in schools which is a result of the socialist decision to teach "sex ed" in schools. The examples/proof goes on and on.
Look at the liberal lefts other front runner Sanders. He wants to spend trillions of our dollars on his socialist agenda. And all the while "Freedom of the Press" has given ultimate power to the liberal left media to control peoples thinking, make the issues and set the arguments.
The socalled "Right" is just another side of the same coin.
The flag does stand for the U.S.A. and the constitution which it upholds. Any Christian who flies it is supporting an ungodly government plain and simple. Before long I wouldn't be surprised to see a rainbow flag over the Capitol.

Canis Vulpes:
The only rights Buttigieg would be looking for for LGBT people at this point is to protect them from raging Christofascists who want them dead because their holy book says so. I assume you have a problem with that, keeping people safe from harm from bigots.
It isn't the homosexuals trying to take away Christian rights, it's people who want to uphold the divide between church and state. And if someone taught me in school that hey, homosexuals exist, they are what they are and have existed since the beginning of time and no, they're not interested in your children, and could you maybe please not attack and kill them, I can't see why I or anyone else would take issue with that.
For a smaller portion of the population, it IS normal. Just like being left-handed.

Lance D Johnson #wingnut #racist naturalnews.com

As San Francisco collapses into Venezuela, the city turns a parking lot into a homeless camp with “case officers”

The desperation that is sweeping through the streets of socialist Venezuela is starting to infect the liberal-run cities within the United States. San Francisco, for example, is so suppressed by liberal policies; non-profits are now turning parking lots into homeless camps. The common cause: The left’s socialist economic policies are punishing the working and Middle class, squelching opportunity, entrepreneurship and free market incentives that could lift people out of poverty.

In the past year in San Francisco, the number of people living homeless out of their vehicles has increased 45 percent. An estimated 1,700 people live out of their vehicles in the city now. The city has set up a pilot program to accommodate some of them. In order to clear RVs out of residential neighborhoods, a parking lot has been set up to contain a small fraction of the homeless population. The pilot program will allow thirty vehicles to park there over the next ninety days. The parking lot will include amenities such as portable toilets, portable showers, and case managers. The pilot program will be set up near the Balboa Park Bay Area Rapid transit station. The case managers will refer some people to shelters and help others find addiction treatment and mental health care.

Cities run by Leftists are high-crime suicide cities, full of desperate, homeless people
San Francisco’s Golden Gate Bridge is patrolled by five officers who have one job – to identify and stop the dozens of people who commit suicide off the bridge each year. The city is currently constructing a suicide safety net under the bridge to catch the most desperate people.

The overall homeless population in San Francisco has grown 17 percent over the past two years. The mayor of San Francisco plans to add 1,000 new shelter beds to accommodate the city’s growing homeless population. The city is slowly turning into Venezuela, where drug addiction runs rampant, where gangs rule the streets, where people go hungry and defecate on the streets. Socialist policies have created income inequality, driving the middle and working class into poverty. These liberal policies have choked the entrepreneurial spirit out, while emboldening the most desperate behaviors.

The Left promise “progress” with their new tax programs, but their incessant taxes only stifle the productive members of society, ultimately emboldening Third World helplessness, drug addiction, and disease, right inside the most prosperous Nation in the world! It doesn’t matter if the government promises health care to everyone, including illegal aliens; it doesn’t matter if the progressives want to double the minimum wage or make education free; in the end their socialist policies will destroy the economic structure, replacing opportunity and free will with suppression, subservience, and desperation.

The Left welcomes illegal immigration, and San Francisco is a sanctuary city, where there is no rule of law. San Francisco’s streets are filled with drug paraphernalia and helpless individuals who aren’t allowed to defend themselves against the rising crime syndicate.

All liberal-run cities are headed in this direction. If Washington D.C. is hijacked by the same decrepit mentalities in the future, then America’s entire economic structure will be put at risk — the rule of law breaking down, with violent criminals and drug dealers running the streets.

If Venezuela’s socialist collapse isn’t a strong enough warning, then Americans should heed the warning signs developing within the liberal-run cities throughout the United States. The Left, lacking any real principles or sanity, is slowly descending America into chaos, homelessness and drug addiction.

Imperial White Knights of the Ku Klux Klan #racist iwkkkk.weebly.com

Platform of the Imperial White Knights:
Enemies from within are destroying the United States of America. An unholy coalition of anti-White, anti-Christian liberals, socialists, feminists, homosexuals, jews and militant blacks have managed to seize control of our government and mass media. This gang of criminals and degenerates has declared war on the hard working, tax paying, White citizens. White Americans have become second class citizens in the country our ancestors built from nothing. The liberal dictatorship seeks to disarm us and leave us at the mercy of savage rapist and murders. Bands of bloodthirsty criminals prowl our streets. They rape, rob and murder with impunity. As our women and children are butchered by these subhumans, the Republicans and Democrats demand that white people remain silent and show tolerance. Freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, freedom to keep and bear arms are all being taken away. All the mighty pillars of American democracy are being torn down by the left wing tyrants. The Imperial White Knights of the Ku Klux Klan plan to change things for the better. We shall liberate our nation from these savage criminals and restore law and order to America.

TRADITIONAL VALUES: The liberal government and its media encourage our young children to behave like primitive savages. Homosexuality, bisexuality, transsexuals, sado-masochism, and every other type of vile perversion is applauded by the scum that control our country. The American Knights demand a return to sanity. We call for a restoration of Christian values to all walks of life.

CRIME: America is the most violent nation on the face of the earth. Major cities like New York, Chicago, Miami, Atlanta and Philadelphia have been all but over run by hordes of savage criminals. The liberal government papers these subhuman and attempts to disarm law-abiding citizens. The American Knights demand that our cities be liberated from these barbarians. We shall remove the killers and rapists from our streets and execute those that deserve it.

ABORTION: Thousands of innocent children are slaughtered each day at Baby killing centers all over the country. The government has made abortion a convenient form of birth control. The American Knights will outlaw this barbaric, satanic practice and punish the sadistic doctors who are guilty of these crimes against humanity.

GUN CONTROL: The so-called gun control bills enacted by the government are nothing but anti-self defense laws designed to disarm law abiding White citizens. The Klan will completely restore the right of all law-abiding citizens to keep and bear arms.

THE MEDIA: All three of our television networks are controlled by jews. Most of our daily newspapers, magazines and book publishing companies are owned by jew tycoons. The Klan will smash this jewish monopoly of our mass media. We will restore the right of free speech and open debate of political issues.

EDUCATION: America's public schools, colleges and universities have been turned into political indoctrination centers run by deprived liberals, communist and jews in our public. WHITE teachers and students are raped and robbed by niggers and other savages on a daily basis. The Klan will remove the criminals from the classrooms and put them behind bars where they belong. Forced bussing will be outlawed. Prayer will be returned to our schools. All teachers who continue to promote anti-American doctrine will be removed and replaced by decent American patriots.

HOMOSEXUALITY: The Klan will take away all the special rights and privileges granted to homosexuals by the liberal dictatorship over the last few years. Homosexuals will no longer be permitted to adopt children or marry each other. Gay bars, gay nightclubs, and gay bathhouses will be shut down.

IMMIGRATION: Millions of Third World bandits enter our country illegally every year. The Republicans and Democrats do nothing to halt this massive invasion. America is being transformed into a new Mexico. The American Knights call for an end to this madness. We shall halt all immigration from non-White nations and use the U.S. Army to restore integrity to our borders.

THE NEGRO PROBLEM: The Klan is strongly opposed to the insane policies that discriminate against White people in favor of unqualified and lazy niggers. We shall abolish affirmative action and minority quota systems. All unqualified blacks will be removed from positions of power and influence in our government. The Klan will launch a massive campaign to liberate our cities from the black gangs that presently terrorize them.

THE ECONOMY: Jewish bankers and shylocks control the American economy with an iron hand. The American Knights will remove these users from power and restore a Constitutional money system. Taxes will be lowered, the corrupt Federal system will be smashed, and the foreign buying up of our nation will be halted. The Klan will place trained economist in charge of our economy and punish the jew tycoons who have brought America to the brink of financial disaster.

FOREIGN POLICY: The Klan favors a strong foreign policy that closely guards American interests around the world. The Klan will encourage all other White nations to throw off the yoke of zionist/liberal occupation. All aid to worthless third World nations like Israel will be cut off. The foreign policy of the Klan led United States will be: AMERICA FIRST, LAST AND ALWAYS!

Fred Gallagher #fundie lenconnect.com

As the war on Christianity continues in the United States, we seem to accept the fact that we should never offend or cause anyone discomfort by encouraging those baddy Christians to express cheer, hope and peace on earth to everyone at Christmas. Please, let’s not dare offend anyone.

Well if anyone cares, I am offended! I am greatly offended by the stealthy actions of the ACLU and other liberal socialist organizations that are slowly stripping our country of the Christian foundations that are responsible for our very freedoms and the creation of our extremely successful society.

It is time for Christians of all denominations to come together to fight this attack on our religion, our culture and our very way of life. The anti-Christian movement is worldwide and has been frighteningly successful.

How can we fight this program? You can start by wishing everyone a very “Merry Christmas” and not just “Happy Holidays.” It would also be a great idea to go to church and bring your family with you. We should consider not buying from any store or company that does not allow “Merry Christmas” to be uttered.

You may also be more careful about who you vote for at election time. Contrary to popular belief, religion and liberal, progressive or communist socialism cannot coexist. The religion of socialists is not atheism but socialism itself. They believe that their god is the government.

Maybe with this small effort, we can regain that warm Christmas spirit that was enjoyed by everyone while I was growing up. On that note, I would like to wish everyone a very merry Christmas and the blessings of a happy, healthy and prosperous New Year. As always, if that offends anyone, I can only say BAH HUMBUG!

Matt Forney #fundie mattforney.com

[A transcript of Matt Forney's speech at the recent Identitarian Ideas IX conference]

I don’t think I need to remind anyone that the election of President Donald Trump was a turning point in American and European history. For our entire lives, our overlords in the government and media have told us that we were on the losing side of history. That we were destined to fail. That the future of our civilization was rainbows, unicorns and chocolate chip cookies, fruits Frenching their boyfriends in front of empty churches, neon-lit mosques eclipsing the cities our forefathers labored to build, and finally, being finessed out of our neighborhoods by swarthy foreigners who stare at our sisters, wives and girlfriends the way lions stare at gazelles.

But for now, the arc of the moral universe has been redirected.

The arc of the political universe has also been redirected. One of the most important achievements of the past two years has been the total destruction of the mainstream American right-wing. My friend Edwin Oslan calls them “Conservatism, Inc.,” the alt-right calls them “cuckservatives,” but regardless of how we abuse them, they were the primary impediment to real, nationalist change in the West. It is they, not the left, who are the biggest losers in the age of Trump. Right now, the left is so excited about the prospect of “resisting” the President that they almost seem sexually aroused by it. It’s your National Reviews, your Weekly Standards, your Rick Wilsons and Rich Lowrys and rich finks in general who have lost everything in the God-Emperor’s ascent.

I’m not just talking about the neocons, the loudest, yappiest poodles echoing in the cuckservative kennel. There’s a whole world of inanity beyond the armchair quarterbacking of soft, pudgy Manhattan intellectuals renaming French fries to “freedom fries” or calling on poor men’s sons to fight their wars for them. Mr. Trump has helped sledgehammer the foundations of American cuckservatism, and we are now dancing among the ruins.

A common refrain during the election was that Donald Trump was not a “true” conservative. The myth of the post-National Review right-wing in America is that the United States was intended to be a different society than the nations of Europe, one bound not by blood and soil but by the liberties granted by the Constitution: the proposition nation. In the minds of the geldings who believe this myth, such as, for example, the guy at CPAC who denounced us as “left-wing fascists” a couple of days ago, Trump and the alternative right are a rejection of these core American values, a return to the bad old days of European nationalism, endless war and diminutive Austrian men with funny mustaches.

The problem with myths is that they have a bad habit of being false. The proposition nation so beloved of William F. Buckley and Norman Podhoretz is nothing but Saran wrap stretched over the casserole of white America. While it’s true that the Constitution represented a break from the European tradition of monarchy, the ideals that fueled the American Revolution were derived from Enlightenment thinkers such as John Locke and implemented by Americans of European descent. Without Europe’s peoples or its philosophies, there is no Constitution, there is no right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, and there is no United States of America.

The “golden age” of immigration to Ellis Island, so beloved of cucks and leftists and a fundamental underpinning of the proposition nation myth, is itself a crock of garbage. As Jim Goad detailed in his book The Redneck Manifesto, during the 19th century, corporations lobbied the U.S. government to bring in Italians, Chinese and other foreigners to break the backs of labor unions and lower wages for the average worker. The lie that immigrants do the jobs that Americans don’t want to do has a far longer history than you think.

But myths cannot take root unless they contain some truth. You may not believe that Jesus Christ died for your sins, but that doesn’t necessarily mean that the Romans didn’t nail him to the cross. Similarly, while the U.S. is hardly a proposition nation, bound together only by the Bill of Rights, its history as a colonial state has kept white Americans from forming a cohesive, rooted culture.

Rare are the Americans who are so attached to their hometowns that they don’t want to leave them. Packing your bags and moving to another state, even if it’s on the other side of the country, is as American a tradition as sportsball and diabetes. From the settlement of Jamestown and the landing at Plymouth Rock to the Louisiana Purchase to the California gold rush to the rise of the Sun Belt in the 1950’s and sixties, if white Americans didn’t like where they were, they went somewhere else. I know that when I was a kid, I dreamt of nothing more than getting out of my hometown of Syracuse, New York, that decaying Rust Belt ghetto midway between New York City and Toronto.

People who are constantly moving from point A to point B cannot put down roots and develop a sense of self. In fact, recent scientific research has shown that the brains of those who live in the same place their entire life develop far differently than those who migrate to new locales. White Americans never developed a unified sense of who they are because they’ve never stayed in one place long enough for the question to come up. And that’s before we get into mass immigration, media propaganda and the other myriad ways that cultural Marxists have tried to destroy the spirits of white Americans.

Now, we do have strong regional identities: as explained in the book Albion’s Seed, the United States was settled by four distinct groups from the British Isles, and our politics and culture is in many ways a continuation of the struggle between the Cavaliers and the Roundheads during the English Civil War. But no singular white consciousness has ever existed in the U.S. Ask a Swede, a Pole, or a Hungarian who he is and what his nation means to him, and you’ll get concrete answers rooted in cultural memory going back centuries. Ask the same question of an American and you’ll quickly find out that there’s no “there” there. At the moment, mindless consumerism is the only duct tape holding the U.S. together.

So, yes, the cucks have—had—a glimmer of a point: as a settler state of European mutts, the U.S. was not merely an extension of its fatherland. But that has come to an end, not because of Donald Trump or the alt-right, but ultimately because of the left themselves.

Years ago, when I was skeptical of white advocates and tribalism, I wrote on my old blog In Mala Fide that a political movement like the alt-right would never work because whites in the U.S. don’t define themselves by their whiteness, unlike blacks. A reader of mine interjected by saying that whites have already been defined as white, in the negative, by the left. And he was right.

To be white is to be the world’s whipping boy. It means being blamed for everything from poverty in Africa to environmental degradation to women not having enough space to sit down on the subway. It means being told to shut up and sit down, that your opinion is worthless because of your “privilege,” and that the eventual disappearance of your people and culture is a sign of progress.

To be white, straight and a man is even worse, because you’re told that your natural masculine instincts, your natural desires to bed and wed women make you an oppressive misogynist. In 21st Century Parody World, six-year olds are allowed to take dangerous hormones so they can become a funhouse mirror version of the opposite sex, but not asking your wife for permission before you kiss her can land you in prison for rape. And if you’re not happy with this arrangement, you’re expected to sate yourself with degenerate Japanese cartoons and pornography, the bread and circuses of the globalist empire. That’s how mad the Marxists are: they don’t merely want to destroy our culture and identity; they want to destroy the very things that make us human.

Sun Tzu stated that when you have surrounded your enemy, you must give him a way to escape, or else he will fight you to the death, having nothing to lose. The left never learned that lesson, because they’ve pursued whites—white men—everywhere they’ve gone, leaving them no quarter and no place to call their own. Even video games, long the province of virginal nerds, were not safe, which is what sparked the GamerGate movement three years ago, the first successful backlash against cultural Marxism in most of our lifetimes. The white men of gaming saw leftists trying to subvert their favorite hobby, one they retreated to after society rejected them, and said no more. Enough. This line you shall not cross.

It was this spark that ignited the pile of TNT that was the Trump campaign and the alternative right. The average Trump voter isn’t explicitly aware of all the issues that we are versed in. They don’t know everything that we know. But they know, deep down, that something is wrong. They know that fifty years of mass non-white immigration and globalist free trade have ruined them financially and placed their lives and that of their children in peril. And they see, day in and day out, the chattering classes tell them that they are the problem. They see liberal arts dilettantes in Brooklyn brownstones, rent paid courtesy of Daddy’s credit line, banging out “thinkpieces” every day claiming that all the world’s ills are thanks to those stupid white rednecks in Kentucky, Michigan or Pennsylvania, and as soon as they kick the bucket and give way to all these newcomers from Mexico, we’ll be all better off.

White Americans saw this repulsive display and they said no more. Enough. This line you shall not cross. And they turned out to support a champion who would fight for them. Donald Trump is the first politician in years who treats white Americans as a group with interests of their own, interests that are worth defending. While he is far from the alt-right ideologically, Trump’s nationalist presidency is aiding the maturation of white America from an empty, consumerist frontier into a people with an identity of their own, one that runs deeper than pop culture effluvia and waxing autistic about “muh Constitution.”

I’ll end with an interesting anecdote.

Over the past few years, I’ve noticed an increasing number of houses in upstate New York flying Confederate flags. Seems absurd on the face of it. Why are white New Yorkers adorning their homes with the flag flown by the Southern rebels that their ancestors fought in the Civil War? After all, you don’t see many Poles flying the Hammer and Sickle, or many Koreans paying obeisance to the emperor of Japan. Then it hit me: the U.S. has become so deracinated and so debauched that rural Northern whites are reaching for any emblem of culture that they can get their hands on, anything that they can call theirs.

To the cultural Marxists, the Confederate flag represents white America, the white America they seek to destroy and replace with foreigners, a symbol that drives them insane with hatred. To rural whites across the U.S., lambasted as the embodiment of everything wrong with the world, the Confederate flag is a gesture of defiance to those who would see them dead and buried. A symbol of implicit white identity, transcending the petty regional differences between North and South, united against the forces of globalism, multiculturalism, and degeneracy.

None of us can say for certain whether this a struggle our people will win. But I can say this: we will not lie down and die either. Regardless of how the next eight years play out, the dragon of white identity has been roused from his slumber, and he’s not going back to bed anytime soon.

As my friend the Bechtloff says, I’ve made my peace with God. Let’s dance.

Thank you.

Gregory Hood #racist amren.com

Ashley St. Clair and the Bankruptcy of Conservatism Inc.

American Renaissance readers may remember Ashley St. Clair, whom we first mentioned in June. She was a young woman who appeared out of nowhere to become a “brand ambassador” for Turning Point USA, a major campus conservative organization backed by the president. Her job was to promote the group on social media, essentially through attractive photos of herself. She kept her position even after mocking President Trump, anti-immigration conservatives, and her own organization.

Why does it matter? Young campus conservatives, overwhelmingly white, join groups like TPUSA because that is the main opposition to liberalism. However, instead of effectively fighting anti-white policies on campus, groups like TPUSA teach young whites to repeat tired, ineffective “conservative” slogans.

In TPUSA’s case, it’s particularly obnoxious because the group is fanatically opposed to white identity politics, but regularly hosts “leadership summits” for blacks, Jews, women, and Hispanics. The Beltway Right is the main obstacle preventing white identity politics because it funnels right-wing energy into dead ends. Miss St. Clair’s case proved the point; despite her obvious contempt for the president and the anti-immigration grassroots, TPUSA stood by her.

However, TPUSA recently fired her. Her crime? She appeared in a photo with Nick Fuentes, who has been so wicked as to speak at an American Renaissance conference.

Mr. Fuentes was debating Jacob Wohl, a Jewish political activist who’s occasionally in the news for leveling sensational charges against President Trump’s enemies. Miss St. Claire was one of the people present at the debate and appeared in the selfie below. Astonishingly, although TPUSA claims to define itself as defending “free speech,” this photo was enough for Miss St. Claire to lose her ambassadorship.

RightWingWatch triumphantly displayed Miss St. Clair’s scalp, while Miss St. Clair’s associates blasted TPUSA for capitulating so shamelessly.

Commentator Mike Cernovich mocked conservative cowardice.

Kathy Zhu is the former Miss Michigan who was stripped of her title for tweets that criticized the hijab and blacks’ propensity to blame others for their own problems. Now a conservative activist, she condemned TPUSA, in language I will link to but not repeat. She noted that TPUSA does practice identity politics for everyone except whites and does not support free speech.

Black conservative C.J. Pearson also defended Miss St. Clair. He even took a stab at distinguishing white consciousness from white supremacy.

He has since deleted the tweet and apologized, but later said whites should be allowed both racial and national pride.

Still, other conservatives supported TPUSA’s decision to fire Miss St. Clair. Human Events editor Will Chamberlain was one. In the past, he’s argued strongly that “platform access is a civil right.” However, he recently tweeted:

Are covert “racists” ok?

The Washington Examiner was equally harsh. “If you want to be a conservative personality, don’t associate with white nationalists and anti-Semites,” wrote Madeline Fry. Washington Examiner contributor Tiana Lowe said “white culture” does not exist and that identitarians are “incelites.” Brad Polumbo dedicated two columns (so far) to attacking C.J. Pearson for daring to stand up for white people.

The final irony? Mr. Pearson is now an “ambassador” for TPUSA, essentially replacing Miss St. Claire. Protective coloring?

The whole thing looks like a game of musical chairs mixed with kindergarten-level politics. Joe Sobran famously said conservatives think their movement is a “game, a way of making a living.”

“Movement conservatives” are in a never-ending war of position against each other. “Purges” define the movement. Those within the “movement” keep their platforms, media access, and above all, money. Those outside become non-persons. The goal is to become a “conservative personality,” as Madeline Fry explained in the Washington Examiner.

This requires a balancing act. A “conservative personality” must bait leftists, but if a “conservative personality” is pro-white or questions racial double standards too aggressively, his colleagues use the liberal media against him. Ultimately, the liberal media determine who remains within the conservative movement. Miss St. Clair, whatever her faults, is the latest victim of Conservatism Inc. collaboration with its supposed opponents.

I wrote weeks ago I didn’t want Miss St. Clair fired, despite her attacks on opponents of mass immigration. Yet it’s striking that TPUSA tolerated insults against itself but could not stomach her appearing in a photo with Nick Fuentes.

Movement conservatives are paralyzed by fear. So are most normal white Americans. However, movement conservatives could instantly stop what can be called “cancel culture.” They just have to say “no,” and the liberal media’s power over them would be broken.

They don’t. They won’t.

Will Chamberlain speaks of “wartime conservatism.” Yet Conservatism Inc. disarms its fighters. Intellectually, they are limited to repeating slogans about “free markets” or outright lies about American history if they want to stay in good standing. Non-whites organize on racial terms; white conservatives prevent their own people from doing the same. It’s not surprising the Left owns American campuses.

If the American Right is fighting a “war,” its generals are abandoning their wounded and spiking their own guns. They take orders from their enemies and execute their own soldiers when told to do so. It’s immoral to ask people to “fight” for a cause when their “leaders” don’t want to succeed.

No white advocate is trying to be a “personality.” One silver lining to the repression we face is that no one would choose this because it’s an easy way to make a living. We do this because we know our duty.

Identitarianism is rising because it is true and necessary. Conservative failure leaves no alternatives. The “wartime conservatives” have many generals, but not many soldiers. We get more defectors from their side every day. No one will fight for generals who define victory by surrender.

Signaferte #fundie nymag.com

Firstly, the New Right is based off the Nouvelle Droite from Europe, an ethnic nationalist reaction against demographic changes in the west.

There is no connection between "Kosher Conservatives", i.e Republicans, evangelical christians, British Conservative Party, libertarians with this. It grew in Europe in the 90's and 00's as an existential crisis about migration, ageing populations, removal of traditional architecture, Americanization, and populist dislike of conservatives and liberals. It spread to the US in the late 00's online

Trumpists only partially overlap. Most Trumpists are Republicans, who cannot be "New Right'. Early on a lot of New Rightists supported Trump out of hate of Republicans and his few decent ideas, such as saying the Iraq war was bad and comments against globalism (alt-right is anti-war and doesn't support the US military)

Most Rightists have given up on him even before the election. He came out in support of globalism, supports mega-capitalism, supports pollution, has a Judeo-Christian zealot as VP, gone on neocon forades in Syria (All new-righters support Assad). The alt/new right is against military intervention, nation building, excess consumerism, obesity, fossil fuels (American-style) Judeo-Christianity, Americanization of culture, neoliberalism, neoconservatism, and of course cultural left-wing stuff.

The alt-right wants a world in which Europe is inhabited by whites practicing native traditional culture, higher birth rates, the USA is isolationist (and possibly split up) and doesn't spread pop-culture, green energy, third position economics (no excessive capitalism or socialism), rebuilding traditional architecture, education and academia are pro-Western

Pastor Matt #fundie pastormattblog.com

Hitler’s favorite philosopher was atheist Friedrich Nietzsche. In fact, he gave copies of his books to Stalin and Mussolini. Following Nietzsche, Hitler had these words placed over one of the gas ovens in Auschwitz, “I want to raise a generation of young people devoid of conscience, imperious, relentless and cruel.”

Hitler often quoted materialist philosophers with glee. One of his favorite sayings was that the destruction of the weak is a good thing for the survival of the strong for “nature intended it that way.”

Moreover, in Hitler’s Table Talk, a collection of his private sayings preserved by his closest followers, the “fuhrer”, derides Christianity as a “scourge” and wishes Germany will be the first nation in centuries to be immune from its influence. Hitler went so far as to ban Christmas and demand the Hitler Youth praise him on December 25th rather than Jesus.

Hitler also mocked Christianity for its opposition to Darwinism. Indeed, many of his closest colleagues, Goebbles, Himmler, Heydrich and Bormann, were outspoken atheists and materialists also some were intrigued by the occult.

That Hitler was a Christian is one of the most pernicious lies perpetrated by modern secularists. The second, one promoted by revisionist historians, is that Hitler and the Nazis were “right wingers.” In fact, Hitler and his party were left-wing socialists. The Nazis were “National Aryan Socialists.” The only difference between them and communists were that the former was nationalistic while the latter was global in scope. In fact, the body count racked up by the secular left during the twentieth century alone is staggering and unparalleled in history. What also goes unreported is that many progressives of the time, like George Bernard Shaw, were enamored with the Nazi party.

The myth that Hitler was a “right-wing Christian” began in the 1950s when leftist academics who had previously supported the Nazi regime began revising history to cover their butts. They successfully linked the attempts by fundamentalist groups to ban certain books from public libraries (like Henry Miller’s pornographic The Tropic of Cancer) to the burning of books by the Hitler Youth. But this is really the ONLY thing Nazis had in common with far right-wingers (and historians failed to mention that the Soviets and Chinese had also banned these books). For example, the Nazis were pro-abortion and pro-euthenasia, a position they took from Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, who Hitler greatly admired. They also supported gun control and national health insurance.

Harmonica #wingnut identitydixie.com

[From "The Spanish Distinction"]

I recently finished reading The Last Crusade: Spain 1936 by Warren Carroll, it’s a history of the first year of the Spanish Civil War written from a traditional Catholic perspective. Unlike secular historians, Carroll covers the religious motivations of the Nationalists during the war in a more serious way.
[...]
One of the strengths of Carroll’s book is that it discusses the realities of the battle for control in Spain. He describes how unlikely a coup would be successful. The Popular Front took control of the Spanish Navy, traditionally the most prestigious of the branches of the Spanish military. They used the Spanish Navy’s humiliation in the Spanish-American War as a pretext to upend it (oddly enough, Franco was from a traditional naval family, but the decline of the Spanish Navy convinced him to join the Army instead). Too popular to dismiss them entirely, the Popular Front then proceeded to make sure the most conservative, Nationalist generals were deployed out of mainland Spain. Franco, for example, was deployed to the Canary Islands. To stage a coup, Franco would have to find a way to get to mainland Spain from the Canary Islands without naval support.

Fortunately, the Republic overlooked the power of aircraft, mostly because the technology was so new at the time.
[...]
It’s a great story, but it is also a sobering one. Nationalists in the United States are in a far worse position than the Nationalist Right of Spain in 1936. If you have been on social media for the past several years, you’ve no doubt heard someone talk about the possibilities of a new civil conflict. The Normie-Right usually takes comfort in the hope that, “the military will have our back.” On the surface, it makes a lot of sense. It is a sentiment I once shared. I have since changed my mind. There are several parallels between 1930s Spain and the modern U.S. A key component is the exploitation by the Left of a historic and humiliating defeat to take over a traditionally rightwing institution, the Spanish Navy in the first case and the American military, as a whole, in the second. But, there are several differences and they don’t bode well for traditionalists in the American Empire.

For one, the American Left has been working on this a lot longer, and thus done a more thorough job than the 1930s Spanish Left. By 1936, they had only completed the takeover of the Spanish Navy. By contrast, the leftist takeover of the U.S. military has been far more effective. If you ever want an example of this consider the differences between the early 1990s and the late 2000s. When Bill Clinton tried to repeal the military’s ban on homosexuals in the 90s, the top brass fought him tooth and nail, eventually forcing the “don’t ask, don’t tell” compromise. Flash-forward about two decades and the political generals have been in open revolt over Trump’s plan to ban transsexuals.
[...]
One of the most impactful actions Obama undertook during the early part of his presidency, and one that has largely been ignored, even by most of the Right, was a purge of the military leadership. Largely using the disaster of the Iraq War as a pretext, Obama dismissed the older, more conservative generals in favor of more leftist ones.
[...]
There is no element of the U.S. military that is overlooked. It is a seamless, interconnected series of services. Air has been an important part of warfare for over 100 years and its ability to carry cargo has greatly improved. The Left knows this and will not allow such an oversight to happen this time. The American political Left has grabbed control of all facets of today’s U.S. military. Members of the U.S. military cannot provide any private or public commentary favorable toward traditionalism or Nationalism, unless they want to be removed from the service. Rightwing enlistees and officers have learned to keep quiet and follow orders.

Considering the modern realities, an American Franco waiting in the wings to lead a rightwing coup against a leftwing government is pure fantasy. It almost feels like a secular version of Christ’s Second Coming, where the good guys are saved at the last moment. Yes, Christ will eventually come back. Yes, Christ promised us that, “the gates of hell will not prevail over my Church.” But, to hope for this is an incredibly poor strategy. Christ’s promise was to the global Church, not locally, and no man knows the day or the hour when Christ will return. Neither stopped several intense persecutions of Christians in the past 2,000 years and nothing will stop it in the U.S. either.

If your plans rely upon a savior from within the U.S. military, you are set up to lose. Likewise, if your plan is to hope an American Francisco Franco will rise up, you are setting yourself up for failure down the line. There is no American Franco coming. Don’t expect Trump to reverse this trend, either.
[...]
The history of the American military makes it sound like a ripe breeding ground for our own Nationalist Franco, but the fact is the military, or at least the leadership, has gone through a significant change and the Right must adjust accordingly. There is no Franco on the horizon. It is a sobering thought, but a necessary one. The political Right, and especially Southern Nationalists, must accept a stark reality: the military is no longer a conservative, Nationalist institution. It is now conquered by the Left.

Conservapedia #fundie conservapedia.com

[from the American History online course; pointers for an essay entitled Liberal Denials About History]

GENERAL DENIALS

The following truths about history are typically denied by liberal history textbooks:

- That "Yankee ingenuity" (American inventions) far surpassed the rest of the world, and brought great wealth to it
- That military battles are an essential part of history, and of preserving freedom.
- That there were valid reasons for past opposition to immigration which had nothing to do with racism; immigration did not enable the North to beat the South.
- That unions caused great harm, including senseless violence and lost jobs.
- That hard work was the key to the success of many Americans.
- That most great Americans, from Abraham Lincoln to Thomas Edison, were homeschooled.
- That Abraham Lincoln's faith grew while he was President.
- That Benjamin Franklin abandoned the Deism of his youth later in his life.
- That Thomas Jefferson's religious beliefs were not representative of the other Founding Fathers.
- That Rhode Island and Thomas Jefferson, and their view of a "separation of church and state," had no role in the formation of the Constitution.
- That there were conservative Presidents before Ronald Reagan, such as George Washington, James Monroe and Grover Cleveland.
- That "anti-imperialism" movements against the United States were really communist or Muslim movements against Christianity, as in denying the Islamic basis for the Philippine insurgency around 1900.

[later...]

SPECIFIC TRUTHS THAT HISTORY BOOKS DENY

- American Indians are too different from Asians to have descended directly from them.
- Rhode Island was the only state to separate church and state, and as a result it became the biggest importer of slaves.[1]
- Thomas Jefferson was not as successful or important as liberals claim;[2] he failed personally and as president, and little in the Declaration of Independence is attributable to him.
- Chivalry was customary throughout most of American history.
- The greatest corruption in government during the Grant Administration was by the Democratic-controlled "Tammany Hall."
- The misnamed "Gilded Age" generated tremendous prosperity for the world, thanks to an absence of stifling regulation.
Public school education in its current form is less than 100 years old.
- Atheist materialism lay behind the genocidal crimes of the Nazis
- Martin Luther King was a Republican who preached Conservative values.
- The so-called Dark Ages brought a revolution in science and learning from the spread of Christianity throughout Europe and the establishment of networks of monastic 'universities'.
- Lenin was a ruthless and violent dictator who oppressed the people of the Soviet Union as thoroughly as Stalin.
Nazism, with its insistence on the collective, was a left-wing doctrine.
- The United States Immigration Service ran Ellis Island as a harsh, unwelcoming and discriminatory institution.

Michael Savage #fundie rightwingwatch.org

Conservative radio host Michael Savage has high hopes for a Donald Trump presidency, urging the GOP nominee yesterday to “rule by decree” and to pick Savage for a post in his administration if he is elected.

Savage said Trump should launch a “crusade” against the “radical left-wing fringe controlling this country,” even if it means undermining their civil rights. Savage said that Trump should launch inquiries into “treasonous” organizations such as the American Civil Liberties Union, “the head of the serpent” that “must be broken apart,” with a renewed “House of Un-American Activities Committee investigation.”

“The left wing will go insane,” he said. “They’ll say, ‘Savage, you’re violating our civil rights.’ They’ll say, ‘You do not have probable cause to bring people in to investigate them.’ They might be right. But we need to do exactly that for our survival.”

He continued: “Tell me how a society that is open like ours, that is democratic like ours, can survive when enemies of freedom, enemies of democracy are destroying society by using the very freedoms we have in place because of the U.S. Constitution?”

Kaaaarl2 #fundie reddit.com

The left-wing of one group will always become natural allies to the right-wing of a rival. The Left wing has the goal of destroying whatever society they are a part of, and that naturally appeals to the rivals of that society
It's not just Asian feminists, but you often hear of "progressive Muslim reformists" making alliances with neo-cons/zionists. In China, far left-wing anarchists are informally supported through the NED. In Iran, one of the largest Marxist groups is also funded by the US.

islam is cancer #conspiracy topix.com

I honestly believe the media, the liberals, and all parties involved that support Obama know he is not a natural born citizen.
The rabid hatred the left wing has for our Country takes presedence over anything else.
I believe that the Left is using Obama as a tool for punishment against Conservatives.
The Left wants to aboslish our Constitution and remove all religions excluding islam.
Consessions will be made for the murderous moslems due to the fact they helped the Left in their anti America agenda & take over.
Trust me when I tell you that everyone who voted for Obama knows the absolute truth about him.
The Obamaites know he is illegal, they know he is moslem, they know he has terrorist friends and supporters, they also know he has plans to destroy our Country......when you present them with facts, they argue despite knowing the truth. Like I said ...the RAGE coming from the traitors of this Country has reached a rabid level.