Similar posts

Vox Day #fundie amazon.com

[Description of the book "SJWs Always Lie: Taking Down the Thought Police]

Social Justice Warriors have plagued mankind for more than 150 years, but only in the last 30 years has their ideology become dominant in the West. Having invaded one institution of the cultural high ground after another, from corporations and churches to video games and government, there is nowhere that remains entirely free of their intolerant thought and speech policing. Because the SJW agenda of diversity, tolerance, inclusiveness, and equality flies in the face of both science and observable reality, SJWs relentlessly work to prevent normal people from thinking or speaking in any manner that will violate their ever-mutating Narrative. They police science, philosophy, technology, and even history in order to maintain the pretense that their agenda remains inevitable in a modern world that contradicts it on a daily basis. The book is named after the First Law of SJW: SJWs always lie. SJWS ALWAYS LIE is a useful guide to understanding, anticipating, and surviving SJW attacks from the perspective of a man who has not only survived, but thrived, after experiencing multiple attempts by Social Justice Warriors to disqualify, discredit, and disemploy him in the same manner they have successfully attacked Nobel Laureates, technology CEOs, broadcasters, sports commentators, school principals, and policemen. It analyzes well-known SJW attacks as well as the two most successful examples of resistance to the SJW Narrative, #GamerGate and Sad Puppies. Written by Vox Day, Supreme Dark Lord of the Evil Legion of Evil and three-time Hugo nominee who is described as the most hated man in science fiction by Black Gate and The Wall Street Journal, SJWS ALWAYS LIE is a powerful weapon in the cultural war against the thought police.

Jack Package #fundie returnofkings.com

Black Cricket Player Fined $10,000 For Asking White Reporter Out On A Date

Over the past week, another example of non-issue hysteria has been created in the Australian media, further feeding the need for female indignation. The following interview is what started the response:

Chris Gayle Flirts With Reporter Mel McLaughlin During Live Interview in Big Bash League

The man being interviewed is Chris Gayle, a professional cricketer from Jamaica. The interview was held shortly after Gayle left the field after being dismissed in a T20 match for Melbourne vs. Hobart. Gayle currently holds the record for the highest score in a domestic T20 game of 175 not out. This is only one of the many records that Gayle currently holds. His full player bio can be found here.

Off the field, Gayle has always been known as a smooth “ladies’ man.” It is his on-field performances, and his laid-back attitude and flamboyant lifestyle off the field, that have made him one of the more known and likable characters in world cricket today. It is also because of his character that he behaved in this way in the interview with Mel McLaughlin

The response from Mel McLaughlin

The response in the days after the event from the journalist who interviewed Gayle has to be applauded. McLaughlin could have easily used this to set herself up as a professional victim. However, her take on this is that while she was uncomfortable at the time, it isn’t a big a deal. Notice in the interview here she was continually trying to get those interviewing her to get over it as she wanted to talk about what she is actually paid to talk about… cricket.

Even though McLaughlin has accepted that Gayle didn’t mean to cause offence and she wants to move on, others in the media couldn’t accept this and are continuing with their assault on Gayle. While pretending to care about the welfare of McLaughlin, the people interviewing her in the video above don’t seem to care that she was feeling uncomfortable in continually having to answer the same question as to whether she felt harassed or not.

The media response

Chris has currently been fined $10,000 for this “offence,” but even the most novice of fortune tellers could have predicted that wasn’t the end of it. There are currently countless articles vilifying Gayle’s actions from a plethora of media channels on this issue, but the worst of all these is that the most respected source for cricket news the world over (ESPNCricinfo) has published these articles.

Much in the same way that Gamergate began with articles claiming that “gamers are dead,” cricket journalist Dan Brettig is also trying to lecture to men that we need to bend over backwards to accommodate women into another section of what used to be a male space. This was then backed up by a “cricket feminist” claiming that women’s cricket is just as good as men’s, as well as the usual garbage of wanting to introduce quota systems onto cricket administration boards.

Out of fear of becoming the next target for feminist sabotage, the chairman of Cricket Australia Jamie Sutherland has shown support for those wanting harsh penalties on Gayle. The media are currently and quite successfully calling for Gayle to be sacked, and it is now likely that Gayle won’t be part of the next season. Similar to how Bill Cosby had his name tarnished by claims of harassment in the name of publicity, so too has someone come out months after the event allegedly occurred to say that Gayle exposed himself to a female journalist in Sydney during the Cricket World Cup in February 2015:

This journalist is from the same company (Fairfax media) where Gayle was previously employed as a guest columnist. Even though Gayle has denied the allegations and there hasn’t been a single piece of evidence shown to prove this allegation, we can safely assume that Gayle won’t be employed to contribute any columns to this paper in the future.

The public response

The public response to this has been much polarized. After reading the comments sections from various new sources, there have been a surprising amount of people who are getting sick of being lectured to by leftist PC thought police. A lot of people are seeing this “incident”—a man complimenting a woman and then asking her out for a drink. There are, of course, those of the public who have joined the media in blowing this out of proportion.

People are now rightly so comparing this incident to one of Maria Sharapova flirting with a male journalist in a press conference:

Sharapova flirts with Aussie journo

This issue has nothing to do with whether Gayle made the journalist uncomfortable or not. The PC zombies are instead outraged that a man would take steps to fulfill his own sexual strategy rather than passively waiting in line so that women have full control in fulfilling theirs. Gayle putting a woman on the spot scares women and manginas because he is showing that they don’t always have full control. This is also why the red pill is so offensive to most women.

This issue will more than likely blow over in the next couple of days. However, with more and more examples of issues like this coming up each day, it might have the same effect of opening the eyes of a number of men to the feminizing of society.

Vox Day #fundie voxday.blogspot.com

If people can be disemployed for refusing to believe that gender is self-determined or that one group of people murdered a specific number of a different group of people in the 20th century, then they can certainly be disemployed, or even deported, for refusing to believe that God exists and Jesus Christ is Lord.

The fraudulent nature of the Enlightenment has been revealed. Freedom of speech and expression was always just an excuse to try to dislodge Christianity from its dominant position in the West and thereby destroy Western Civilization.

...

Observe that, as usual, equality is the intellectual justification for evil. Equality is evil and Thomas Jefferson's flights of rhetorical fancy notwithstanding, all men are most certainly not created equal in any way, legal, material, or spiritual. Equality is the retarded version of "ye shall be as gods" and nothing good ever comes of it.

Some MRAs #sexist #fundie reddit.com

Post-Gamergate Study Blows Up Conventional Wisdom – Finds Female Gamers Are the Real Sexists

(xNOM)

The results confirmed their hypothesis “that the level of online sexual harassment behavior, especially toward women, will increase after playing a sexualized video game.” Harassment of men did not increase after playing the sexualized video game.

wtf does "especially toward women" mean?

However, in a surprise twist, the female gamers in both groups turned out to be significantly more likely to engage to send sexist jokes to their partner, and most of the sexual harassment was of men.

"especially toward women?"

The admittedly surprised researchers came up with a theory for their findings. They posited that the women sent more sexist jokes because they saw harassing each other as harmless fun and harassing men as a form of revenge.

Hey retards, that's exactly why men sexually harass women as well. There is no evil patriarchy full of toxic masculinity.

(ExpendableOne)

It's always been pretty clear to me that many, if not most, female gamers are far more sexist than your average male gamers. You see it on reddit all the time, grown women trying to victimize themselves because they received male attention; all the while glorifying attention from other women themselves(especially blatant when you look at "female only" subs like girl gamers which is deliberately discriminative) or demonstrating the exact same time of attention seeking behaviour(basically jumping on this "look at me, woe is me, i'm an oppressed female gamer" narrative for attention).

They will cry that lonely, depraved and awkward teenage boys will sexualize or romanticize them online, even when they are literally adult women in a position of power and privilege over them(both offline and online). There is a major empathy gap there not just in where at attention might be coming from but a major negative bias and hostile predisposition towards male attention in general(a dehumanizing and irrational disdain that I could only describe as toxic femininity). If men complained about female attention the way women do about male attention, it would be labelled as misogynous gate-keeping.

So many times, I see female gamers make everything about gender, when gender isn't necessarily a relevant factor, but neglect gender as a factor when it is actually relevant. Male to female sexual attention from a heterosexual man relates to gender, but female gamers will try to present this as misogyny because apparently all boys should act like eunuchs and treat girls no differently than boys(despite biology, sexual market value and romantic gender role expectations all being relevant factors). When a guy insults a girl online, even with it's totally warranted and in the most gender neutral manner, female gamers will make this a gender issue, and try to label the situation as misogyny(this is especially true if gendered terms like "bitch" are used, despite the context in which they are used had nothing to do with gender).

And that's not even going into the number of women who are absolutely toxic, hostile and condescending online, often explicitly so towards men/boys, just because they can(and, because they are women, there is very little to no accountability for their actions because most people wouldn't tell them they are wrong or would just automatically side with them because they are women). Or the fact that men seem far more open/comfortable with the idea of playing female protagonists than women seem to be with male protagonists.

(DJ-Roukan)

"Reality can be whatever I want" -Feminazis

Where proof and truth are subject to interpretation.

A team of scientists placed a frog on a table and ordered it to jump. it jumped

They then cut of it's legs and ordered it to jump, it did not.

They concluded that a frog with no legs cannot hear.

"Reality is often... disappointing" - Thanos

Exactly.

There is one glaring truth exposed in this study that they seem to either have missed or do not want to admit.

Women commit sexual harassment more than men because we hold men accountable, and we do not hold women accountable, but encourage it.

Does not take a team of scientist to understand that, and it seems they do not.

(omegaphallic)

It's fucking disgusting that people can't joke with each anymore, it's callled msygony or whatever now. The SJWs are fighting to make this a soulless, joyless world, utterly passionless and sterile. I'd rather be offended and just talk it out now and against this live like that, eggs all the time.

These Gamer Girls aren't sexist, they are just joking around like normal people do all the fucking time, this shit is just getting down right oppressive. You can't flirt safely anymore, you can't joke with friends, ect... Enough.

Jim #fundie blog.jim.com

Nazis are commies and commies are progressives.

If you are a Nazi, you think that the rot set in around 1930-1950. If you are a progressive, you think the rot has not set in yet.

So if you are a Nazi, you pretty much want the New Deal, or the New Deal on steroids. Nazis are leftists who have been left behind by the movement ever leftwards.

If you are a Nazi, you think leftism is fine except for Freudian Theory, second wave Feminism, race denialism, and the Frankfurt School’s Cultural Marxism, all of which can be plausibly blamed on Jews.

But when the Supremes hypocritically endorsed “separate but equal”, that was race denialism, with a touch of hypocrisy to make it actually workable.

The Jewish problem is that Jewish conversos to progressivism failed to pick up on the hypocrisy, and started demanding that people actually live according the moral standards that everyone piously endorsed around 1820 or so.

The rot did not set in with cultural Marxism. The rot set in with “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights”. There is your race denialism right there.

As for feminism and the destruction of marriage, the attempted divorce of Queen Caroline in 1820 established the moral principle that women are so naturally pure and virtuous, that it is mere cruelty to enforce the marriage contract on women, it should only be enforced on the naturally wicked and despicable sex, men.

If you want to get out of the trap, say after me: “All men were not created equal, some should command some should obey, some should not merely obey, but are naturally slaves, and should not be allowed to make their own decisions. If found wandering loose causing problems, should be placed under the control of an owner. Women’s sexual choices are apt to be dangerous to society and to themselves, thus fertile age women should always be controlled by husbands or fathers. A women not subject to a man is suffering misfortune, as for example an orphan or widow, or is wicked and needs punishment, as for example a harlot.”

As soon as you denounce the declaration of independence and the emancipation of women the logical case the Jews are a big problem collapses. And the emotional case for hating Jews is the same as that of any market dominant minority, envy and covetousness, which is also at the root of declaration of independence and the emancipation of women.

Getting rid of the Jews will not help you. The problem is inside your head. They are not emitting evil mind control rays at you. You have been emitting evil mind control rays at them. Umpteenth wave feminism is the logical consequence of the failure to divorce Queen Caroline.

One Angry Gamer #conspiracy #sexist archive.fo

SJWs Are Furious E3 2017 Is Open To Real Gamers

Most so-called “game journalists” at major mainstream media outlets aren’t real gamers. They don’t know how to play games (as evident with Polygon’s video of DOOM), and many of them have no history of gaming (as evident with all the major sites reiterating falsehoods spread by charlatan culture critics). The reality is that most game journalists aren’t real gamers. So you can imagine the furor when they realized that real gamers will finally get to attend E3 this year.

The news recently went out that the ESA will open up E3 2017 to everybody. All gamers from all walks of life and all backgrounds, from all over the world, each one coming in different shapes and sizes, will be able to attend the event. Tickets will be available between $150 and $250 for a three-day pass.

Typically, some SJWs were not pleased that real gamers would be able to finally bypass the uninformed, fascists gatekeepers known as game journalists, and see and experience the games and technology for themselves. No longer would gamers have to rely on misinformation, sociopolitical commentary and identity politics pervading the coverage of E3.

Various individuals, many of whom identify as SJWs, took to social media such as Twitter to sound off against gamers making their way to E3.

[…]

Others, however, were hoping that this would be a short-lived exercise in pro-consumerism, hoping desperately that the legs of opportunity would close shut tight on gamers in years to come.

[…]

Other SJWs found it to be a mistake, a blasphemous call for the hydra of consumerism to emerge from the far corners of the interwebs; a stake to the heart of game journalism’s oligarchy; a raping of the gated clique that once controlled the foyer of information that lactated from the bulbous PR udders dangling from the publishers’ visceral bloat that drips begrudgingly through the sphincter of the media and out through the curdled lips of their blogs.

[…]

That above tweet is also assuming that indie developers showing a little sexual interest in pasty, unattractive games journalists wouldn’t also sway their convictions toward the dark side. In the case of Kotaku, it swayed them into a culture war that spawned a hashtag that opened the eyes of the public to the incestuous nature of journalism’s clique.

Regardless, other SJWs continued on with the whole “gamers are a hate group narrative”, the same narrative that made gamers hate journalists in the first place, and the reason that they would rather attend E3 in person than trust the likes of anyone reporting for a website who was attached to the Game Journo Pros.

[…]

Moreover, those who actually play games still managed to get the last laugh, with a WAM! report revealing that #GamerGate wasn’t a harassment campaign; an FBI report revealing that #GamerGate wasn’t a harassment campaign; and the FTC working with #GamerGate to help bring down Gawker and improve ethical standards for all media outlets.

Gamers’ milky victory secreted onto the tongue of SJWs’ pride, languishing there like a badge of honor that can’t be rinsed away; all while the pole of ethics lodged its way down the orifice of corruption, filling the gaping hole with improved policies and updated disclosures, changing the landscape of media journalism forever.

And now that the ESA has opened the doors to the public, it’s time for real gamers to make E3 great again.

Alexander Anderson #fundie reaxxion.com

It was a cold and snowy day, when suddenly a gamer announced online that she’s a girl. We’ve seen the scene played out multiple times across different gaming communities. By revealing herself as a female, her value suddenly increase 100-fold and instantly become as rare as a legendary pokemon.

A gamer girl will be forced to navigate through dozens of hormone driven posts from little boys who have never seen the sun. All that repressed biological male desire need to be released somewhere. However, a gamer girl has unlimited power once she manage to weather the storm. She can use her newly discovered power to have the entire gaming community under her control due to the perks of being a woman in a male-dominated environment.

Gamer Girl Privilege
It’s irrelevant if a girl is a “real” or “fake” gamer because they all receive similar special treatment. Typical membership benefits include perks such as the ability to receive extra items and help from most guys within the gaming world. Whether it be the rare items or that hard quest, it doesn’t matter. All she has to do is ask. Why go through the grind and farm for items when you can get it for free from others? A gamer girl won’t always succeed asking for help and getting what she wants, but her chance of success is considerably much higher than that of a male gamer.

A gamer girl also has a benefit of not ever being called out for her mistakes in the game. Calling out a girl for making an in-game mistake or telling her that she’s bad at the game online is an equivalent to punching or hitting a girl in real life. E-white knights will be there to defend her and you will be e-excommunicated from that social circle for daring to speak the truth.

In contrast, always expect to get blamed if something went wrong within the game, because nothing is ever her fault even if it clearly is. In her mind, she’s a woman and you are a random gamer guy who is probably nerdy. She should be paid money just for playing this game with you, let alone interact with you.

Gamer-Girl-Fail-...

It doesn’t just end there. Benefits and special treatment extend into social media where girls already have an advantage. She can start streaming on twitch.tv or open an account on Twitter and easily obtain thousands of followers of dedicated male gamers simply because she is a girl that happens to play video games. If it doesn’t work out, she can always play random video games on Youtube and become an e-celebrity.

For any social justice argument she gets into online, she can be sure that the majority of people will be on her side no matter how ridiculous or non-factual her argument is. Her opinions and feelings are prioritized above all other gamers and she must be kept happy at all time. IF SHE’S NOT HAPPY, she’ll leave us!!! And I won’t have an e-online girl to talk to anymore!!!!!!!!!11111

The Root Of Gamergate
Women get special treatment from every level in the gaming community. It doesn’t matter if they are a casual gamer, hardcore gamer, competitive gamer, game developer, etc. They are the first priority and their needs come above all else. This culture of women-first mentality is the reason why #gamergate first happened.

Zoe Quinn first took advantage of someone actually being nice enough to let her make a game despite her obvious lack of skill and imagination. Next, nobody called her out for creating Depression Quest. The game was so bad it shouldn’t be classified as a game. Next she slept with gaming journalists in order to get favorable reviews for her terrible anti-game game. We all know what happened next—the information leaked on the internet and her white knight gamers rushed to defend her action and attempted to delete all evidence regarding the topic like it never happened.

Zoe Quinn should have been condemned and then banished into the void for her actions instead of being hailed as a martyr who is fighting a holy war against misogyny and harassment. What she did is a slap to the face game developers who actually work hard to make great games and earn those favorable reviews.

Next we have Anita Sarkeesian, a girl who as recently as 2010 admitted herself that she is not a gamer. Her low-quality videos are an insult to gamers everywhere because it’s obvious that she doesn’t know what the fuck she is talking about. She continues to mislead the public by cherry-picking game mechanics and misinterpreting ideas within games in order to fit her feminist propaganda.

Vox Day #fundie voxday.blogspot.com

The thing is, the conservatives speaking out against this are the some of the same conservatives who also celebrate disemploying and jailing people for racism, anti-semitism, and Holocaust denial, and support both state and federal laws criminalizing speech in support of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions Movement and denying federal contracts to corporations that boycott Israel. All of which result in penalties considerably more harsh than simply not being able to graduate from one particular university.

Why is the enforcement of the cuckservative narrative any more acceptable to these self-professed champions of free speech than the SJW narrative or the Fake Science narrative?

So, to be blunt, I don't give a damn about any these so-called "free speech" rights anymore. The First Amendment is observably dead and it's now clearly all just a power game of "who, whom" between rival identity groups, which means it is time for Anglo-American Christians to go back to having the temporal courts enforce blasphemy laws that criminalize all blasphemies against God, including denying His being or providence, all contumelious reproaches of Jesus Christ, all profane scoffing at the Holy Scriptures, and exposing any part thereof to contempt or ridicule, and punish violators with death, imprisonment, corporal punishment and fine.

That is not only more legitimate than these various anti-speech laws and public policies, it is actually part of the common law that has been degraded by non-Anglo immigrants who never understood it due to their historical lack of exposure to it.

Vox Day #fundie voxday.blogspot.ca

It occurs to me that it will be helpful to begin compiling a list of confirmed SJWs, both for those who work for SJW-converged organizations and want to add to their collection as well as for those who wish to keep their organizations free of the creatures.

In either case, it will be useful to know if an individual is an advocate of an ideological movement that promotes the politicization of the workplace, insists that all individuals and organizations make social justice their primary objective, and seeks to disemploy or no-platform everyone who rejects their principles or refuses to submit to their ever-shifting Narrative.

Brian Niemeier #wingnut brianniemeier.com

The recently concluded stage of the battle for Western civilization saw one side drop its mask and effectively admit they want to destroy Christendom. The other side also made a bold change of tactics by actually fighting back.

Perhaps the most significant dimension of the culture war's 2010s escalation was that many of the battles were not fought for the future, but over the past.

The archetypal form of these engagements was #GamerGate, a consumer revolt staged by exasperated video game enthusiasts fed up at being lied to and lied about by the gaming press. Though GG ultimately failed to reform games journalism, it exposed the hysterical Cult that's hijacked the entertainment biz as a vehicle for nihilistic anti-culture propaganda.

That the Gators and SJWs were fighting over video games is either taken for granted or glibly dismissed by most commentators. But both vantage points miss a key aspect of the conflict. On one side stood gamers who'd enjoyed their hobby since childhood and liked it the way it was. On the other massed invaders who demanded that gaming change to comport with their progressive creed. If you spent any time in the hashtag ca. 2014-2016, you couldn't escape the refrain, "I just wanted to play vidya." Gators, by and large, longed for a return to the status quo ante where they'd be left to indulge their favored pastime in peace.

In this light, #GamerGate can be seen as a conflict between those who love the past and those who are infatuated with a utopian future.

[...]

The real dynamic behind #GamerGate and similar anti-SJW reactions was Gen Y's spiritual emptiness splitting two ways. Of the great mass that tried to fill the void with nostalgia, many swelled the ranks of gamers. The Pop Cult did its evil work on roughly 25% of Ys, whose desperate but misguided quest for meaning led them into the Death Cult's belly.

Tragically, Gen Y witches may have the same motive as their peers caught in the nostalgia trap. The former try to recreate the joy and richness of their beloved childhood IPs, but their abandonment of the vestigial Christian worldview that made those properties work dooms them to forever produce hollow knockoffs tainted by Death Cult propaganda.

Again, it makes sense. Millennials wouldn't try to remake She-Ra or Thundercats. They have no attachment to either. Millennials, as the name implies, are consumed with chasing an illusory utopian future without history or memory.

There's an important lesson in the Gen Y witches' victory over their Pop Cultist siblings. A firm moral vision--even a warped one--trumps hazy nostalgia. The Outer Party can't beat the Inner Party. You don't show up to a holy war without a religion.

In the next round of culture wars, the Millennials, having finally come into their own, will rush to realize their utopian fantasies. They will face opposition from red-pilled Zoomers. Gen Y will have the chance to share their lessons from the school of hard knocks with Gen Z. By embracing their vocation as world-weary mentors, Ys may find a last chance for redemption.

Roosh #fundie rooshv.com

How Patriarchy Will Return

Stage 1: Rise Of The Networks
This stage has already taken place with the spontaneous development of internet communities that serve to help men meet women, teach them entrepreneurship skills, improve their health and bodily strength, and enlighten them with counter-cultural truths. They arose because in the past forty years the singular cultural focus has been about empowering women (providing them with benefits and privileges) while giving bad advice and withholding information from men, if not outright sabotaging them. The informational black hole left by the establishment was filled by various teachers and thinkers like myself.

My teachings on game, along with the columnists on Return Of Kings and the hundreds of contributors on RVF, are but a drop in the bucket of Western men helping each other through antifragile networks that share common ideological beliefs. Each network attracts men who have become aware of societal problems that inhibit their own self development and liberty when compared to women.
Timeline: Already completed
Stage 2: Seed Resistance

There are many paths to truth, and once a man has attained what he believes is the correct reality, he will execute one of two options: (1) escape from the effects of the oppressive narrative by structuring his lifestyle to avoid its most severe faults, or (2) try to impose his righteous narrative upon society.
I tried the first option by expatriating to foreign lands, but have soon watched large components of that narrative follow me, most commonly through Western technology. I have moved to option two by actively resisting efforts of the far left narrative that is currently dominant in the West. Seed resistance can come in many forms:
Providing basic alternative media — producing blogs, videos, podcasts, and mailing lists that disseminate subversive information
Counter operations — producing attack pieces against far left narrative bots that expose their damaging behavior and hypocrisy
Awakening men — enlightening men by continuing to refine and disseminate ideological talking points and memes
Each resistance group has their own style of fighting, from sharing concealed knowledge to public shaming through humorous images and comics. Collectively, they begin to push back against efforts of the dominant narrative.
Timeline: Ongoing
Stage 3: Culture War

Separate networks and groups will form natural alliances that put aside their differences to defeat the enemy. In the past year, I have exchanged friendly gestures from the men’s rights sphere, religious conservatives, liberal gamers, and even white nationalists, whereas in the past there was either no communication or only hostile communication between us. These groups are currently probing each other for common ground, loyalty, and commitment.
Assuming that individual groups are ready to sacrifice and put their differences aside (a challenging task), a huge fighting force will be created that can balance out the immense power of the existing establishment. The neomasculine sphere will be but one regiment in a large army to defeat the enemy.
Culture war will involve sustained, asymmetrical, and intense informational warfare against the enemy that starts to damage their way of life, happiness, and disposable income. They will soon have sleepless nights just like I did in Canada when the full force of the establishment came down upon me. While guerrilla tactics must still be used to ensure our self-preservation, allied forces may be strong enough in the near-term to engage in open battle without having to be as anonymous as before.
Here are some additional strategies for successful culture war:
Acute divide and conquer campaigns that target weak-willed individuals who are not ready to fight without being part of the herd.
Sustained criticism of individuals to encourage meltdowns and bad decisions, facilitating their descent into illogical madness that makes them lose support or prestige within their group.
Psy-op campaigns to undermine the word of women and other alternative groups by painting them as pathological liars or mentally insane
Creation of pressure groups (i.e. mobs) to target small companies that are sensitive to even small amounts of negative publicity and profit loss.
Stealth infiltration into intellectual circles and various institutions such as universities, media, military, and government bureaucracies.
The victories of culture war will also make it easy to attract new members to our ideology. Initially, self-improvement (e.g. “how to get laid”) and dissemination of truth allowed men to find us, but now merely being seen as a “winner” will be sufficient, and I saw this first-hand with the large jump in my follower count after winning in Canada. A winner strategy may also attract women since they have an innate need to be part of groups with strong males they admire or respect.
It is difficult to estimate the start of culture war, but I want to state that it began in August 2014 with the introduction of Gamergate, a revolt against corrupt social justice gaming websites. The revolt has turned into a sustained gathering of individuals who criticize gaming websites and other sectors of the media, and which has resulted in millions of lost dollars for media companies along with career frustration for social justice journalists.
More recently, another victory over the narrative came in the form of the Hugos, a science fiction book awards show, when authors of the far left failed to exclude “Sad Puppies” authors whose disagreements with the narrative blocked them out in past awards. The cuckserative meme followed shortly afterwards to expose the traitorous social justice leanings of establishment conservatives. If we are indeed in culture war, events such as Gamergate, Sad Puppies, cuckservatism, and my battle in Canada will become more commonplace and increase in intensity in the next two years.
The current narrative is failing an increasing percentage of people, so a culture war is necessary for them to see the opposing viewpoint that is being deliberately hidden from them or outright distorted.
Timeline: 2015 – 2025
Stage 4: Culture Vacuum

After culture war, a large percentage of the population will have lost faith in the existing narrative and convert at least partially to an alternative narrative. Victory will come when approximately 20% of the American population will solidly believe in neomasculine or alternative ideals by 2025, compared to what I estimate to be 3% and lower currently. A size of 20% seems small at first glance, but it allows a tipping point that is more than sufficient to convert others at a rapid pace as the existing narrative fades away.
Culture vacuum will be highlighted by intense confusion within the population over what to believe and think. Individuals will be far more open than during culture war to give the patience and time required to understand the logic behind an alternative narrative that they were once hostile to, especially since the losing narrative utterly failed to provide them with answers on how to live and pursue happiness, and which may have even put their life at risk.
The groups that comprise the winning side of the war will now attempt to differentiate between each other and convert believers, not unlike how varying religious faiths attempt to convert those to their own church. This may result in battles where once-allied groups fight each other out for the spoils. As is said, those who start the revolution are rarely those who end it, so it is possible that the winning group will simply be less fatigued than proto-groups that were involved from the beginning stages.
It is at this stage that a winning group must position themselves to accumulate institutional power. Those who infiltrated institutions during culture war can now more readily assert their views to usher in new policies and laws that roll back the damage caused by the previous narrative. They can also open the door to allow entry of those with similar beliefs to form powerful in-groups within the institutions.
If existing institutions can’t be successfully infiltrated, parallel institutions must be made. This will be easiest to do when it concerns establishing independent media organizations. We will have to improve the quality and professionalism of our entertainment and propaganda to rival that of current slick products that so easily capture impressionable minds.
Timeline: 2025 – 2045
Step 5: Return Of The Patriarchy

Over the course of a generation, there will be a gradual return to the patriarchy as at least 50% of the population believes in traditional ideals and have the voting power to usher in non-bought leaders who see patriarchy as the only way to maintain cohesion of society.
Since America is a multiracial nation, this means that minorities must be a part of those aching for patriarchy, or else the country may be split into several different countries along racial, cultural, and economic lines. I expect many minorities to come to the realization that patriarchy serves them better and provides a deeper life meaning that the consumerist and nihilistic ideals of the far left narrative that race-baits them for their own ends. While converting these more liberal groups may seem like an impossible task today, it’s a requirement if the United States will continue to exist as one nation.
In this stage, neomasculine ideals will be obviously entrenched in the media, government, and academic spheres. Women will be encouraged to marry young instead of embarking on a decade or two of sexual experimentation. Men will put their labor into helping their family or society instead of spending large amounts of time trying to get laid for short term pleasure. Heuristic rules of living that stem from religion and tradition will be used instead of ever-shifting scientific “facts” and technological mandates. A swing back to puritanism may result, but families will be stable, welfare will be less encouraged, each gender will fulfill their biological roles, and society will be better off as a result.
Timeline: 2045 – 2075
Conclusion

The return of patriarchy will essentially roll back what has been added since the sexual revolution of the 1960’s, and all the damage that the far left has caused since then. Neomasculinity, and those ideologies that overlap with it, will either triumph outright in America or be a big part of republics that form as a result of secession, and I can state this without exaggeration since the current narrative is already showing severe signs of stress that will lead to outright cultural collapse of nations that have foolishly adopted it.
The process of culture change is long, and the end result may occur well after we’re dead, but since the current narrative is not sustainable, victory is inevitable. When you have the truth on your side, it becomes only a matter of time and effort. I just hope to be alive when these events do unfold in the Western world.

Mencius Moldbug #fundie unqualified-reservations.blogspot.de

(Extract from A gentle introduction to Unqualified Reservations (part 1))

The triangle of professors, bureaucrats, and public opinion is stable, because the professors teach as well as advise. Of course, there is a time lag. The system experiences some strain. But it will stay together, so long as the polarity does not randomly reverse - ie, because Cthulhu decides to suddenly swim right rather than left.

But no. Cthulhu may swim slowly. But he only swims left. Isn't that interesting?

In the history of American democracy, if you take the mainstream political position (Overton Window, if you care) at time T1, and place it on the map at a later time T2, T1 is always way to the right, near the fringe or outside it. So, for instance, if you take the average segregationist voter of 1963 and let him vote in the 2008 election, he will be way out on the wacky right wing. Cthulhu has passed him by.

Where is the John Birch Society, now? What about the NAACP? Cthulhu swims left, and left, and left. There are a few brief periods of true reaction in American history - the post-Reconstruction era or Redemption, the Return to Normalcy of Harding, and a couple of others. But they are unusual and feeble compared to the great leftward shift. Nor, most important for our hypothesis, did they come from the universities; in the 20th century, periods of reaction are always periods of anti-university activity. (McCarthyism is especially noticeable as such. And you'll note that McCarthy didn't exactly win.)

The principle applies even in wars. In each of the following conflicts in Anglo-American history, you see a victory of left over right: the English Civil War, the so-called "Glorious Revolution," the American Revolution, the American Civil War, World War I, and World War II. Clearly, if you want to be on the winning team, you want to start on the left side of the field.

And we are starting to piece the puzzle together. The leftward direction is, itself, the principle of organization. In a two-party democratic system, with Whigs and Tories, Democrats and Republicans, etc, the intelligentsia is always Whig. Their party is simply the party of those who want to get ahead. It is the party of celebrities, the ultra-rich, the great and good, the flexible of conscience. Tories are always misfits, losers, or just plain stupid - sometimes all three.

And the left is the party of the educational organs, at whose head is the press and universities. This is our 20th-century version of the established church. Here at UR, we sometimes call it the Cathedral - although it is essential to note that, unlike an ordinary organization, it has no central administrator. No, this will not make it easier to deal with.

This strange chiral asymmetry implies some fundamental difference between right and left. What is that difference? What does it even mean to be left rather than right? How can an entire system of independent thinkers and institutions, without any central coordinating agency, recognize that everyone should go left rather than right?

Genghispullo #conspiracy reddit.com

(Talking about the progress of Gamergate)

The progress isn't on the actual issues.

The progress is on the core of the resistance awakening.

More and more people know what's going on now.

The forces in motion can't be stopped, but enough people are aware that there will be someone out there keeping the ideas of freedom alive.

Vidya won't be saved. The internet won't be saved.

But something will survive. The industry might crash but gamers will still make games for gamers. Maybe not with billion dollar budgets and Hollywood actors, but games by gamers for gamers will survive in some form.

And those with knowhow will find a way to use computers to communicate in private anonymous ways. Might not be as widespread or as easy to find as chan boards, but you can't stop the signal.

Jim #wingnut #racist #conspiracy #transphobia blog.jim.com

[From "State of the left singularity"]

Preamble, to get those not yet darkly enlightened up to speed
Leftism is entropy in the apparatus of state. Leftists ally with far against near, in the struggle within the state.

The driving force of leftism is a holiness spiral. The state is a synthetic tribe, so the state always has, furtively or openly, a state religion, so leftists struggle for power by endlessly adding new, ever holier, stuff to the state religion, and eliminating the unprincipled exceptions and theological inconsistencies that made earlier forms of the state religion workable and practical.

Thus leftism goes ever lefter. And the more disordered the state becomes, the faster it goes left, and more left it becomes the more disordered it becomes.

Every day the left gets lefter.

As we approach the left singularity, as the left goes faster and faster leftwards, tidal forces increase, with the left most part of the left moving left faster than the not so left part of the left, the leftmost become increasingly dangerous to the not quite so left.

The radical left is purging the less radical left, purging the Haidt / Mounck / Pinker axis. They probably will not purge Biden, since more and more often, he no longer knows where he is, what year it is, and fails to recognize family, but Pelosi is headed for removal soon enough, finding it increasingly difficult to control the radicals, and increasingly make self destructive concessions to them.

These fractures within the left eventually result in the left singularity being halted short of infinite leftism, as sooner or later, someone important decides “Yes, I do have enemies to the left and I have no choice but do whatever it takes to stop them.”

To merely stabilize movement ever leftwards, ever faster, it has to become as dangerous to be too far left as it is to be too far right. That, merely stabilizing the left wing singularity to current levels, as Stalin and Cromwell did, is a quite drastic measure, and the more dangerous it has become to be too far right, the more dangerous it has to become to be too far left, and the more drastic a measure it is. Cromwell’s measures were drastic, but non lethal. Stalin’s measures were drastic and massively lethal and nothing less could have saved Russia. Once they started killing rightists, it could only be stabilized by killing leftists.

England having been stabilized non lethally, Charles the Second could then restore normality by merely massively purging the state Church, executing a handful of people, and encouraging large numbers of clerics to get out of England. Unfortunately many of them went to America, where they founded Harvard, and have been plotting to take over the world since then.

Harvard was the Vatican, the official state Church of New England, thus the left has organizational continuity and continuity of personnel all the way back to the Christian state church of ancient times. Today, as when Emperor Constantine founded Constantinople, you cannot get a job in the state and quasi state apparatus, unless you have passed catechisms administered by the seminaries of the state religion, but while the catechisms of Constantine’s Church concerned unfalsifiable claims about the next world, today’s catechisms contain ever growing falsifiable and false claims about this world,

[…]
And now, the meat of the post, where we are today
Drag Queens having government sponsored and government approved sex on the floor of the public library with nine year old boys. The books in the library they performed sexual acts on the floor have been purged of all thought crime, and the library needs a coat of paint.

Schools pressuring students to transsexualize.

A school curriculum of hatred against white people, reading, writing, and arithmetic being white privilege. Quiet in the classroom being white privilege.

Arrest quotas on blacks that enable them to swagger down the street because they can beat up white people with impunity and not get charged or arrested, but white people will be arrested for defending themselves.

Ever increasing violence and intimidation against anyone insufficiently left wing.

Collapse of marriage and family.

Courtship and dating can no longer be plausibly or interestingly depicted in movies, books and dance videos. the destruction of Star Wars and the self destruction of Marvel Comics. Han Soylo. The mating dance can no longer be realistically or entertainingly depicted. Dance videos can no longer depict men acting male and women acting female.

Child protective services abducting children from Christian families and selling them to gays.

Hatred of white people and America taught in schools. Second class citizenship for whites.

That pretty girls no longer walk the Embarcadero, that José Inez García Zárate came to San Francisco illegally, lived on crime and welfare, and is still there despite illegal status and numerous arrests for very serious crimes, that Zárate murdered Kathryn Steinle on the Embarcadero because she was white, that he was acquitted because a brown man murdering a white girl.

White flight, whites are now fleeing San Francisco as they fled Detroit.

White flight everywhere. We are running out of places in America to run to. Most white people in America cannot return to the place that they were born and raised because “It has changed”, though if they were to say how it has changed, that would be a thought crime. The cost of housing soars as we run out of places to flee to

The silicon valley meritocracy exemption has collapsed, and now silicon valley is collapsing because of affirmative action. They now have to practice affirmative action like everyone else. Hot new technology no longer comes out of Silicon Valley.

Abortion as a holy sacrament. They shut down the Churches and the cancer wards, but did not shut down the abortion mills.

The collapse of intelligence in the student intake of Harvard and Yale. They are stupid, because selected for race, sex, and political correctness, not ability as they select for PC rather than smarts.

[…]

Increasingly second class citizenship for white people. There are arrest quotas limiting the arrest of blacks, so a black can attack white people with little risk, while if a white defends himself, he faces grave risk. So blacks swagger down the street and disrupt the workplace.

The pope worshiping naked pagan idols.

[…]

That a man’s obligation to look after his wife and children is legally and socially enforced, and his obligation to love and cherish socially enforced, but a woman has no legal or social obligation to refrain from cucking her husband, and her obligation to honor and obey is not only not socially enforced, but aggressively opposed.

CH #fundie heartiste.wordpress.com

This is great article by Bruce Charlton, a must-read, because it explains so much about post-America shitlibbery. (For a complementary thread on the topic, try here.)

Executive Summary: what liberals have in IQ they lack in common sense. It’s an evolutionary trade-off.

...

That description sounds precisely like the basis for the cognitive and social schisms currently tearing apart Western nations. Self-segregating and supercharged-signaling “clever sillies” are running their homelands into the ground with overbearing government interventions to “close the gap” and open borders to “create more gaps”. This stupidity of intelligence signaling would be funny if it weren’t also so damned threatening to the continued survival of the West.

...

For an immediately palpable example of SMRT shitlibs applying abstract and systematic reasoning to a social intelligence system, see their snarky “you’re more likely to be killed by falling furniture than by a Muslim terrorist” apples-to-oranges comparison. (Socially intelligent reply: “Sure but falling furniture isn’t getting on planes with me, patting me down after a two hour wait in the TSA line, or calling for death to all infidels.”)

Charlton goes on to explain why it seems like we are seeing more pajamaboy shitlib faces and cuckfaces in the West[.]

...

Psychological neoteny is likely correlated, by the associative property, with physical and facial neoteny. Physiognomy is real, and it’s no accident that we often observe the silliest of shitlibs have very punchable faces devoid of any masculinity.

Shitlibs are, in essence, arrested adolescents, forever on the hunt for the next thrill to add meaning to their disconnected lives. Risk-taking and novelty-seeking are useful traits to have when one must impress a mate (usually a man impressing a girl) or broaden the pool of acceptable mates; but those traits are destructive when scaled up to the level of social policy and beyond the bounds of the life stage when mate acquisition is paramount.

...

But we are now at the point when the libshit SMRT mate signaling has reached sexual market saturation; I predict, and in fact we can see it happening already, that deftly counter-signaling the leftoid equalism orthodoxy will be a powerful display of fitness, for what do women love more than a bad boy rule-breaker who can buck the system and not just survive, but thrive? As always, BALLS wins babes.

...

I was convinced before reading this Charlton hypothesis that what’s happening in the AngloGermanoSphere is runaway “intelligence signaling”; that is, aesthetically disfigured and socially untethered White shitlibs of the West can only pride themselves on their abstraction smarts, and to stay ahead of their peers they have to signal hard against common sense, leading to xenophilia spirals (as well as degeneracy spirals and anti-White spirals).

(As a reader wrote, “Believing in a lie can require more intelligence; you have to know the truth to conceal it properly, plus the pleasing lie, plus the explanation why the lie is more true than the truth.”)

What’s happened is that common sense (or gut instinct, or mental sanity) has become associated with declassé opinions and flyover rubes. The cause of this association is complex, but it’s where we are today and it means that the shitlib clown-cognition signaling will continue until a cataclysm forces common sense on them. I doubt that increasingly insulated, credentialist suck-up shitlibs will rediscover the merits of common sense on their own.

Addendum: the Maul-Right is the next stage of human evolution: high IQ AND common sense. And that fact, more than any other, explains the hysterical response of the Left to dissident crimethinkers and to Trump; the Left knows a real threat to their rule when they see one.

The QuQu #fundie castaliahouse.com

The founder of the #AltFurry, John Kelly (@jmktwit on twitter), made the observation that O’Sullivan’s Law held true in the case of #GamerGate, and had a devastating effect on its impact in mid-to-late 2015. As such, #AltFurry is an EXPLICITLY right-wing and EXPLICITLY radical furry political movement. It will stand as a bulwark against the furry fandom completely surrendering to the excesses of the left. It’s motto is “We must ensure the existence of our species, and a future for Furry children” and its core principles are “Anti-speciesism is code for anti-furry” and “species-mixing is furry genocide”.

It is also a furry supremacy movement. Too long has social justice rhetoric been used to advantage one group of humans over another. It’s us non-humans’s turn to utilize the same absurd rhetoric to point out human privilege wherever we see it, and institute furry affirmative action policies to take down the homosapientarchy. This includes demands for increased furry representation in media, demands that people unpack the knapsack of human privilege when performing cultural criticism, putting an end to humansplaining, seeking legal permission to wear a fursuit in driver’s license photography, getting the phrase “yiff in hell furfag” labeled as hate speech, and more.

If you want to join the #AltFurry movement, you simply need to adopt a fursona, and start using the #AltFurry tag on social media accounts to do the work of the movement. If you’re tired of the fandom slipping leftward and want to demonstrate the absurdity of the increasingly common rhetoric based off of hierarchies of privilege, join the internet’s least privileged group and help us weaponize it against the very humans who invented it in the first place.

Tony Demarcus, Ph.D., D.D. #fundie disqus.com

My utmost esteemed and illustrious fellow true Christians,

Relative to how a man is to treat his wife, we have a wonderful sermon by one of our utmostest brethren, Brother Pastor James the Preacher! To wit:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M4jYrvaKbKQ

Just because the man is to be the head of the sister of Eve, 1 Cor 11:3, does NOT mean we are not to love the second-class citizen that is the female! The notion may be foreign to the false Christian like the assorted Cathlic, Homolutheran, Episcopalian, false Prestyterian, or any other rejector of the Christian Bible, but not the real Christian. To wit:

"Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it". Eph 5:25.

As the glorious Pastor Reverend Dixon would say, "Bible says so, we believe so!" Praise and Glory!

Stan and Elizabeth Madrak #fundie demonbuster.com

Occult Practices (partial listing): Fortune Telling, Ouija Board, Cards, Good Luck Charms, Seances, Edgar Cayce, Jeanne Dixon, Mind Control, Witchcraft, Four-leaf Clover, Rabbit Foot, Wishbone, ESP, Transcendental Meditation, Yoga, Hypnosis, Drugs - Tranquilizers and Pain Relievers, Incense, Dungeons and Dragons, Pendulum, Palm Reading, Automatic Handwriting, Pierced Ears, Horoscopes, Signs of the Zodiac, Voodoo, Magic, Levitation, Waterwitching, Tea Leaf Reading, Secret Organizations and Lodges, Eight Ball, Smoking, Chewing Tobacco, Dipping Snuff, Drinking Alcoholic Beverages, Kabala, Handwriting Analysis, Strychnine, Arsenic, Spirits of Gene and Chromosome Damage, Crystal Ball, Tarot Cards, Psychic Readings, Spiritualism, Sorcery - Drugs - Pharmakia, LSD, Rubik's Cube, Clairvoyance, Telepathy, Para-psychology, Enchantments, Potions, Ankh, Peace Sign, Star of David and Five Pointed Stars, Artifacts, Tatoos, Owls and Frogs, Snakes Self Realization, Deja-vu, Martial Arts, Buddism-zen, Hinduism, Taoism, Yin and Yang, Confucianism, Acupuncture, Hare Krishna, Bingo Gambling and Playing Cards Gambling, Astral Projection, Eckankar, Reincarnation, Arthur Ford, Ruth Montgomery, Divining for Metal or Minerals or Anything Else, Psychosybernetics, Mind over Matter, Pyramid Power, UFO, Trances, Dolls (Originated in Voodoo), Psychometry, Psychic Predictions, Clairaudience, Second Sight, Auras, Metaphysics, Mental Science, Vision, Superstition, Fetishes, Runes, Amulets, Talismans, Satanism, Indian Witchcraft, Sun or Moon Worship, Spiritual Healing, Italian Horn, Indian Religions, Warpaint, Maize Fertility, Christian Science Healing, Omens, Karma, Rock and Roll, Mediums, Hex Signs, "Jesus" Rock and Roll, Itial, Irish, Gypsy, German, Etc., - Witchcraft, Rappings, Poltergeists, Haunted Houses, Fantasy, Science Fiction, Tolkien, Conjuration, Incantation, Idolatry, TV Shows like "Merlin", Walt Disney, Rose Mary's Baby, Reading Hari, Biofeedback.

Crystal Dixon #fundie advocate.com

Crystal Dixon, who was fired from her job at the University of Toledo in 2008 for writing a newspaper column that argued being gay is a choice and not a matter of civil rights, has been hired to lead a county human rights department in Michigan.

In 2008, Dixon lost her university job as associate vice president for human resources over a column she wrote in the Toledo Free Press called “Gay Rights and Wrongs: Another Perspective.” Her column was a response to an opinion written by the newspaper's editor-in-chief.

“As a Black woman who happens to be an alumnus of the University of Toledo's Graduate School, an employee and business owner, I take great umbrage at the notion that those choosing the homosexual lifestyle are 'civil rights victims,'” she wrote. “Here's why. I cannot wake up tomorrow and not be a Black woman. I am genetically and biologically a Black woman and very pleased to be so as my Creator intended. Daily, thousands of homosexuals make a life decision to leave the gay lifestyle evidenced by the growing population of PFOX (Parents and Friends of Ex Gays) and Exodus International just to name a few.”

The Confederate Council #fundie csagov.org

This is the official web page of the Confederate States of America. Official statutes and journals of Congress of 1861-1865 are contained herein and are, for the most part, still binding upon the Confederate States of America as is the ratified C.S.A. Constitution of 1861.

The national Government of the Confederate States of America does not, at this time, have any salaried personnel, but does pay some reimbursement of expenses of contractors for work contracted for by the government. It is important to note that the national Government is not structured to legally have control of the State C.S.A. Governments, but rather for them to function with the national Government and each other in accordance with the national C.S.A. Constitution and their own State Confederate Constitutions according to the dictates of the Citizens therein.

The Government of the Confederate States of America is not a political party nor a club but a government and thus does not endorse any political party or candidate nor club or other organization. Nevertheless, the Government does appreciate positive support by such other organizations and/or political parties and the C.S.A. Registered Citizens will elect candidates to hold the various offices of the various Confederate Governments.

The Government of the Confederate States of America never officially surrendered to the Federal Union and thus still exists as an occupied government under the control of the Federal Union (UNITED STATES, INC.) in the Southern States of America including: Arkansas, Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, No. Carolina, So. Carolina, Tennessee, Texas and Virginia and within the Territory of Arizona and the provisional Territories including Colorado, Oklahoma, Kansas, Maryland, Montana, New Mexico, Oklahoma and Wyoming.

C.S.A. Registered Citizens live in these various states and are eligible to vote in Confederate elections. Non-voting C.S.A. Registered Citizens also live in a number of Northern and Western states which are not considered part of the territory claimed by the Confederacy and thus may not vote in Confederate elections unless they move to a Confederate State or Territory.

Most C.S.A. Registered Citizens are also U. S. Citizens by virtue of the 14th Amendment of the U. S. Constitution, which is not necessarily recognized by the Confederate States of America, but yet applies due to the occupation and thus such C.S.A. Registered Citizens may individually vote in U. S. and U. S. Satellite State elections.

So long as a peace treaty between the Confederate States of America and the Federal Union (United States of America) recognized by the UNITED STATES, INC. has not been signed and thus occupation and reconstruction still apply, the governments of the Confederate States and the Citizens thereof are obliged to obey the laws of the occupying nation.

No new treaty between the Confederate States of America and any foreign government other than the occupying nation (Federal Union or the United States of America) may legally be concluded, but the subjects of the occupation living in the South, whether or not they are C.S.A. Registered Citizens, may avail themselves legally to the laws and supposed rights and protections of the U. S. Constitution.

Meanwhile and prior to a negotiated peace treaty and termination of occupation, the C.S.A. Registered Citizens are admonished to avoid any form of military hostility against the Federal Union or the satellite states thereof. We pray that the Lord will bless His people if we are worthy and that He will shield the innocent from harm as in the Lord’s prayer.

In the Service of Almighty God,
The Confederate Council

Therumancer #homophobia v1.escapistmagazine.com

The more reasonable, non-religiously driven, right wing majority like me, well we aren't a factor because we don't have the media power to be heard an any large scale, we pretty much write message boards like this to make our noise, and sadly few of us bother to come into hotbeds of opposition like I do to express their viewpoints as opposed to engaging in a lot of back patting in friendlier enviroments.

As far as the gay/lesbian thing goes, I won't get into it in detail, but as I mentioned it's more pervy than hypocritical. I just haven't gone into a full run down on homosexuality and what I think of it in general. In short I do not define "homosexuals" as all being the same thing, men and women are differant, and gays and lesbians are differant. One of the problems with dealing with the "gay rights movement", compiling statistics, and setting fair policies is specifically that people lump it all together as opposed to dealing with gays and lesbians as two entirely differant issues, with two very differant outlooks, subcultures, and behavior patterns, that are rarely allied for anything other than political power. Gays and Lesbians don't exactly group up together "in the wild" like they do during rallies and shows of political unity. To make one point, when is the last time you've seen, or even really heard of a lesbian stalking and molesting a young girl, or a mother raping her daughter, or whatever else. It HAS happened, but not very often in reality. Now how many times have you seen or heard about it with men? You do a quick search you'll find tons of stuff about gay child molesters and predators but very little about lesbians. Likewise accross the spectrum women are more likely to kill their offspring/dependants when they go off the deep end, than sexually molest them over a period of time. As I said, there are exceptions, but that's one big pattern. Working casino security for a pretty long time I literally chased scores of creepy guys away from the little boys in the arcade, I did not have a single incident of finding a woman trying to lure little girls away or anything. It's not a point many people on the leftward side of things like to hear, but think about it sometime. You do a job like I did and you'll see the differances first hand as well in who you have to step in to deal with. Basically, chances are if I thought Lesbians represented a threat, I wouldn't be pervy towards the idea, especially seing as by their nature girls who like girls want nothing to do with me. :)

Various Chinese officials and journos #conspiracy theguardian.com

One of the most popular topics on the Chinese microblog Weibo on Thursday was a one-minute clip of a US congressional hearing this week on how the country was dealing with the coronavirus.

In the video posted by the People’s Daily, Robert Redfield, director of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, is asked whether there may have been deaths attributed to influenza that could actually have been the result of Covid-19. Redfield responds in the affirmative: “Some cases have been actually diagnosed that way in the United States today.”

Redfield’s vague answer was enough to add fuel to a conspiracy theory that has been gaining traction over the past two weeks in China – that the coronavirus did not originate in China but may have come from the US instead.

“The US has finally acknowledged that among those who had died of the influenza previously were cases of the coronavirus. The true source of the virus was the US!” one commentator said. “The US owes the world, especially China, an apology,” another said. “American coronavirus,” one wrote.

The theory has gained traction over the past few weeks, after a respected epidemiologist Zhong Nanshan, said in a passing remark at a press conference on 27 February that although the virus first appeared in China “it may not have originated in China”.

Zhong later clarified his statement, saying that the first place where a disease is discovered does not “equate to it being the source”. He told reporters: “But neither can we conclude that the virus came from abroad. Only through investigation and tracing can we answer that question.”

Yet only Zhong’s first comment has stuck, repeated by Chinese diplomats, state media and officials who have subtly encouraged the idea.

On Thursday, a foreign ministry spokesman suggested without evidence the US military might have brought the virus to the Wuhan, the centre of the outbreak. Zhao Lijian accused the US of lacking transparency, saying on Twitter: “When did patient zero begin in US? How many people are infected? What are the names of the hospitals? It might be US army who brought the epidemic to Wuhan. Be transparent! Make public your data! US owe us an explanation!”

China’s ambassador to South Africa said last week on Twitter that the virus was not necessarily “made in China”.

An editorial in Xinhua last week also echoed Zhong: “The epidemic was first reported in China but that does not mean it necessarily originated in China … The WHO has said many times that Covid-19 is a global phenomenon with its source still undetermined.”

Officials have framed the campaign as a protest against the “politicisation” of the outbreak by countries such as the US, where some officials have continued to use the terms “Chinese coronavirus” or “Wuhan virus,” despite the World Health Organization’s discouragement. But analysts say China may be looking to deflect blame as the coronavirus spreads around the world.

“We might be heading into first global recession caused by Chinese Communist party mismanagement,” wrote Bill Bishop, author of the China newsletter Sinocism. “Previous manmade disasters in China since 1949 never really spread outside the People’s Republic of China’s borders in meaningful ways.”

“This time looks to be different … And that is likely one of the reasons the propaganda apparatus and PRC officials are pushing so hard the idea that virus may not have originated in China,” he wrote.

For weeks, Chinese state media pointed to a seafood market in Wuhan as the likely origin for the virus while researchers said the source had not yet been determined, but few have floated the idea that it came from outside of China. Another respected Chinese researcher, Zhang Wenhong, said in an interview with the China Daily that he did not believe the virus had been imported into China.

“If that was the case, we should have seen patients emerging from different regions in the country around the same time rather than their concentration in Wuhan,” he said, in comments that later appeared to have been removed from the interview.

“I think the consensus is still clearly that the virus did originate in China,” said Jane Duckett, professor at the Scottish Centre for China Research, University of Glasgow, focusing on Chinese policy and health.

“This would appear to be a nationalist narrative aimed at countering criticism of the Chinese government for not better managing the outbreak in its early stages,” she said.

Shifting the narrative may also be important as China tries to move forward, now that new infections appear to have levelled off. This week, the Chinese leader, Xi Jinping, visited Wuhan for the first time since the outbreak began as state media pronounced “victory is near”. State media showed elaborate celebrations marking the closure of the last of the temporary hospitals in Wuhan.

“This is a propaganda effort aimed at the domestic audience. Among the Chinese public, there is a general awareness that delays in notifying the public led to many more infections in Wuhan,” said Victor Shih, a politics professor at the University of California, San Diego.

He said: “This campaign is aimed at distracting the public from the party’s delayed response.”

Russell Pipkin #racist politico.com

One of those was Russell Pipkin, 47, who lives just south of the Mason-Dixon line in Mount Airy, Maryland, between Washington and Gettysburg, Pennsylvania. Pipkin, a warehouse manager, traces his roots to North Carolina and wears his Confederate heritage on his vest, his belt buckle, his earrings and a ring on his finger. On his right arm, he has tattooed the Southern Cross battle flag with the words "Crazy Rebel."

"It has nothing to do with race," he said, wearing—on top of all his accessories—a battle flag T-shirt as he waited for a mounted cavalry re-enactment to get underway. "It's more, for me, about just the way our country is headed ... Anything that's Southern is viewed as hatred. That's not right."

Hunter Wallace #racist occidentaldissent.com

[From "Slavery: A Positive Good (2012)"]

Dixie

“But I take higher ground. I hold that in the present state of civilization, where two races of different origin, and distinguished by color, and other physical differences, as well as intellectual, are brought together, the relation now existing in the slaveholding States between the two, is, instead of an evil, a good – a positive good.”
– John C. Calhoun, 1837

Is there a positive case for the domestic institution of negro slavery?

(1) In slave societies, negroes were a wealth generating economic asset: America’s slaves were worth more than its railroads, banks, and manufacturing industries combined.

In 1861, the average slave was worth $800. In 2009 dollars, a single slave purchased in 1861 would be an asset worth $135,000.

(2) In 1860, 49.8 percent of the population of Barbour County (AL) were slaves.

(3) In 1860, there were 2,717 free families in Barbour County (AL). There were 1,143 slaveholders. 42.1 percent of free families were slaveholders.

(4) In the Lower Chattahoochee Valley as a whole, there were 47 slaveholders who owned over 100 slaves. If the average slave was an asset worth $135,000, then each one of these super planters in 1860 had a fortune in slaves alone worth a minimum of $13.5 million dollars.

(5) In the Lower Chattahoochee Valley, there were 270 slaveowners who owned 50 to 100 slaves. If the average slave was worth $135,000, then each one of these middling planters had a fortune in slaves alone worth a minimum of $6.7 million dollars.

(6) In the Lower Chattahoochee Valley, there were 1,193 slaveowners who owned 20 to 50 slaves. If the average slave was worth $135,000, then these lower tier planters had a fortune in slaves alone worth a minimum of $2.7 million dollars.

Obviously, the planter class in the Lower Chattahoochee Valley was stupendously wealthy by modern standards – those numbers don’t include their non-slave property or investments and are based on the minimum number of slaves required to belong to each tier.

In 1860, there were 1,150 planters in the Lower Chattahoochee Valley. The planters were only 17.3 percent of slaveholders though. How’s that compared to the stock market?

(7) In the Lower Chattahoochee Valley, there were 1,637 slaveowners who owned 10 to 19 slaves. If the average slave was worth $135,000, then these upper middle class slaveowners had a fortune in slaves alone worth $1.35 million dollars.

(8) In the Lower Chattahoochee Valley, there were 1,485 slaveowners who owned 6 to 9 slaves. If the average slave was worth $135,000, then the typical middle class slaveowner had a fortune worth $810,000.

(9) In the Lower Chattahoochee Valley, there were 4,100 slaveowners who owned 1 to 5 slaves. 47 percent of slaveowners in the Lower Chattahoochee Valley belonged to this group. Every one of these slaveowners had at least one slave worth $135,000.

(10) In Barbour County (AL), 42.1 percent of free families were slaveowners – surely, the great majority of them were middle class slaveowners, while only a small minority were planters.

How much is the average negro household worth after 147 years of free society? The average negro household is worth $4,995.

As we have learned from Paul Kersey, the average single black woman in America has a net worth of $5, which is over a 99 percent depreciation in value from 1861. A third of blacks have a negative net worth. They are effectively bankrupt after 40 years and countless billions of dollars of wasted Great Society redistributive spending.

Freedom failed doesn’t quite capture the magnitude of the social and economic disaster that was abolition: it is more like freedom was a world shattering catastrophe that nearly crippled American civilization.

In free society, the average White household might have a net worth of $110,000 in 2012, most of which is locked up in the value of their depreciating suburban home – with both parents working in order to pay income taxes to a federal government that redistributes their wealth to millions of idle tax consuming negro voters.

In slave society, if you owned one slave, you had an asset worth $135,000 in 2009 dollars not counting your property or home, those slaves worked in direct proportion to the leisure time of a single male slaveowning patriarch, and there was no income tax because the government was funded with a revenue tariff.

(11) That’s the rub: under slavery, the negro was a fabulous wealth generating economic dynamo, the ownership of which emancipated White families from the drudgery of wage labor and significantly contributed to our national prosperity.

Under free society, the negro is the single biggest economic albatross in the United States and a civilization wrecking menace to public safety who through the genius of liberal democracy can vote himself a living from taxes and fees on the income and property of White families.

(13) Libertarians: What planter ever emancipated his slaves based on the assumption that liberating them would increase his wealth and make his plantation more productive?

(14) As a commodity, slaves were used as a store of value like gold and silver or stocks and bonds: a single slave in 1850 was worth $80,000 whereas a single slave in 1860 was worth $135,000.

(15) Paul Kersey writes:

“Black unemployment rates are directly correlated to the fact that a great many Black people are unemployable in America’s service economy, save for government/public jobs. Not institutional racism.”

The only known solution to this problem is slavery.

There are any number of industries where the millions upon millions of negroes who have an IQ less than 85 could be profitably employed today as slaves.

They could be put to work immediately as stoop laborers in the construction industry or in the fields harvesting fruits and vegetables. Alternatively, they could at least be hooked up to bicycles and used to manually generate cheap electricity to promote America’s goal of energy independence.

Even today, a slave society could find some use for them. Black women could be employed as domestics as they were in the Jim Crow South. They don’t have to become welfare queens shacking up with Mr. EBT to breed little Ja’Quares Walkers or Trayon Omar Washingtons in the Booker T. Washington housing projects.

If negroes were enslaved in such a way, we could empty our prisons, raise property values, raise per pupil spending on White students, slash law enforcement and court costs, fund an expedition to Mars, and slash the soaring cost of healthcare by curtailing epidemic black obesity.

(16) As far back as the 1830s, free negroes in the Northern states were notorious for elevating crime, destroying property values, and burdening prisons and other social services.

In free societies, the cost of negroes is socialized whereas it was privatized in slave societies: abolition eliminated natural masters (who provided employment for White working class overseers) who had a vested economic interest and legal responsibility for curtailing destructive behavior and promoting productive labor.

(17) Any student of the discipline of negro management in the Old South could have told you that emancipating slaves, blaming White people for all their various failings, and giving them access to drugs and firearms was a recipe for disaster. See the 21,000 black people who have been murdered by other black people in Detroit since 1969.

(18) In 1850, a slaveowner could have told you that the return on investment on negro education was quite low because of biological racial differences in intelligence.

(19) In 1850, a slaveowner could have told you that abolition and the politicization of the negro was a recipe for disaster based on previous experiments in abolition in Haiti and the British West Indies.

(20) Slave society promoted conservatism and racial solidarity in the Old South. It also created an indigenous elite that had the wealth and political power to resist the encroachment of the degenerating effects of liberal capitalist democracy.

Note: Virtually all the social ills that are commonly blamed on slavery are actually a consequence of freedom.

Slave societies didn’t tolerate or meekly subsidize negro criminals or flagellate themselves with racial guilt. The negro had no status as a citizen or a voter. He wasn’t a huge drag on our national prosperity as he is today in the 21st century.

Slavery was a positive good. It was a successful social system that broadly distributed wealth among Whites, created an elite invested in white supremacy, cultivated a moral sense based on the cult of honor, and most importantly, acted as a brake on the consolidation of power in Washington.

The success of slavery proved to be its downfall. It was a rival economic system that inspired enormous jealously, fear, and envy of the Slave Power in the North. As we all know, that’s what brought about the War Between the States, destroyed the White Republic created by the Founders, and set America down its path to the present racial disaster.

That’s not the fault of slavery though. It is the fault of slavery’s professed enemies.

Patrick Scrivener #conspiracy reformation.org

Adolf Hitler–the grandson of Queen Victoria unmasked at last!!

It should not astonish US that Hitler was so evil because Holy Scripture refers to women rulers as Jezebels and WITCHES (Nahum 3:4, Revelation 2:20, 17:5). King Henry VIII was absolutely correct when he predicted that female sovereigns would be a disaster for England!!

In 1861, Albert, the prince consort of Queen Victoria, was poisoned after he averted a war between Britain and the United States. The prince consort made powerful enemies in the British Parliament because of his opposition to the Crimean War and British intervention in the U.S. Civil War.

After a short period of "mourning" for her beloved Albert, Queen Victoria soon found a new love.

His name was John Brown–the Scottish Rasputin.

In 1868, the loving couple found it necessary to make a top secret trip to the British Crown Colony of Switzerland.

Accompanying her were her physician, Dr. William Jenner, and 4 of her children. Her lover John Brown also accompanied her on the trip as her equerry.

The queen's vacation was all arranged by Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli. "Dizzy" was the real "Father" of the counterfeit state of "Israel" and he had many relatives named Hittler or Hitler in Switzerland and Austria. Only after Hitler's defeat in WWII has the name become disreputable.

[...]

Switzerland has been a British Crown Colony since at least 1600. It was the ideal place for the couple to have their baby as discretion has always been the watchword of that colony.

The queen left Osborne House in the Isle of Wight on August 5 and crossed via yacht to Cherbourg, France. Emperor Napoleon III provided his special saloon train to take her to Paris. After a brief stopover in Paris, she arrived in Lucerne, Switzerland, on August 7.

Queen Victoria's Swiss son was born on August 24–the anniversary of the St. Bart's Day Massacre.

The "Prince of Switzerland" was born in the high altitude Furka Inn.

Benjamin Disraeli's many relatives among the "Jewish" Rothschilds, Hapsburgs, and Hitlers took care of the baby's adoption.

There is no record that the baby was taken back to Britain when the queen returned home on September 11, 1868. Benjamin Disraeli was especially close to the Rothschilds who financed the theft of the Suez Canal from France.

[...]

Like a mother hen, Queen Victoria kept a watchful oversight on all her brood . . . and their offspring. When Adolf was born, she dispatched "Mr. British Empire," Houston Stewart Chamberlain, to oversee his education.

Queen Victoria was very concerned about the education of her grandson Adolf.

In 1889, she dispatched Houston Stewart Chamberlain to oversee his education.

Adolf had no higher IQ than the other boys in his class, but it is not brains . . . but genes . . . that count in the monarchical system.

Houston Stewart Chamberlain arrived in Vienna in 1889 for the express purpose of overseeing Adolf's training

[...]

Austria was the most reactionary country on the face of the earth. The Austrian Hapsburgs were the bulwark of the Papacy for over 1,000 years, and they were still smarting from the loss of the Papal States. "Intense" is a mild word to describe Chamberlain, who was a fanatical believer in the divine right of the British Empire to rule the world. Chamberlain prepared Hitler well for his future role by giving him a thorough grounding in English

[...]

It seems like Chamberlain did his teaching job very well and Adolf was good at subjects that interested him.

Hitler did excel at one subject: drawing and painting.

Like his grandma Victoria and cousin Winston Churchill, Adolf was a fairly good artist.

Adolf was also a very good actor.

If the Axis of Evil had won WWII, Hitler's watercolors would be more valuable than paintings by Michelangelo or Rembrandt.

King Edward VII invited "Edmund" Hitler to join the family in London!!

From the fall of 1908 to his reemergence in Munich in 1913, Hitler seems to have vanished from off the face of the earth. There are absolutely no pictures or records of him during that period. The Austro-Hungarian army conscripted all males at age 21, so by law Hitler had to register for the draft at age 20, or face a fine and imprisonment.

The most likely explanation is that Adolf assumed the identity of his dead brother Edmund and traveled to Britain under that name.

When "Edmund" Hitler arrived in London, the first business of the king was to introduce him to his numerous relatives.

First on the list was Winston, who was very, very busy planning the German conquests of France and Russia.

The biggest event to happen during his stay in Britain was the funeral of Winston's real father, and the coronation of King George V.

Hitler arrived in Britain with his step-brother Alois. Alois was not "royal" so he found a job as a waiter at the Shelbourne Hotel in Dublin, Ireland.

Where "Edmund" Hitler stayed during his time in Britain is a big mystery. As cousin Winston briefed him on his role in the upcoming war, they must have spent a lot of time together.

Chartwell Manor in Kent was the home of the Churchills and its remote location guaranteed privacy.

"Edmund" Hitler left Britain for Munich in 1913

His training completed, "Edmund" said "goodbye" to his Hanover cousins in May of 1913. He dropped the English named Edmund (rich protector) and resumed using his original name. When World War I started a year later, he enrolled in a Bavarian regiment.

"Edmund" left Britain for Munich in May of 1913 and he reverted to his original name because the Austrian secret police soon found the "missing Adolf" and charged him with draft evasion.

A few substantial bribes took care of that problem.

A year later he enlisted in a Bavarian regiment.

His half-brother, Alois Jr., moved to Berlin a year later with wife Bridget and son Patrick left behind in Liverpool. Alois Jr. faked his own death in order to marry another woman.

"Courier" is just another word for spy. Hitler spent most of the war in regimental HQ, far to the rear. His iron cross for "bravery" was fake too, but it helped his rise to power as German Führer. Hitler's career is a classic example of how "royals" succeed in politics without really trying

Hunter Wallace #racist #dunning-kruger occidentaldissent.com

[From "Southern History Series: The Dred Scott Decision"]

Have you ever read the Dred Scott decision of 1857?

If you haven’t done so, I would highly recommend it. The Dred Scott decision was written by Chief Justice Roger Taney who was a native of Maryland. It struck down the Missouri Compromise which opened all the Western territories to slavery. Taney used history and law to explain why blacks were not American citizens and had “no rights which the white man was bound to respect.” He also said the Constitution was formed by the Founders “for them and their posterity, but for no one else.”

[...]

Aside from his ruling in the Dred Scott decision, Taney is known for the [I]Ex parte Merryman[/I] decision in which he denied that Lincoln had the right to suspend the writ of habeas corpus and arrest John Merryman who was being held as a political prisoner in Fort McHenry following the Baltimore Riot of 1861. Lincoln ignored and defied the order of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.

After the War Between the States, the Reconstruction Amendments had to be passed at gunpoint by the Republican Party to establish black citizenship and voting rights. This was because of Taney’s ruling in the Dred Scott decision and the fear the Civil Rights Act of 1866 would be found unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. The Founders had created a White Republic and a voluntary Union of sovereign states for their posterity which Lincoln and his Radical Republican allies in Congress overturned to create the centralized and consolidated empire that we live under today.

Dale Pond #crackpot svpvril.com

Q1) Is there any way you could provide me with more essential data such as equations or texts related to the theoretical developments of SVP, etc.? I find the historical text very time consuming and would prefer to get down to the nitty-gritty.

A1) A comprehensive compilation of SVP can be seen here. To know the mans history is to know his life and work. To know his life and work is to know his discoveries, philosophy and science. Keely worked with sound, vibration and music as applied to and through mechanics, Mind, philosophy, spirituality, chemistry, physics, etc. The basis of everything that there is is vibration. "All force is vibration..." Cayce (900-422) "So is matter." Cayce (1861-16) The study (for many centuries) of sound and vibration has been carefully and extensively organized into what has become the scientific basis of music. A careful and in-depth study of the arithmetic of music will reveal a great deal of the foundation "math" of the Keely legacy now called Sympathetic Vibratory Physics. All forces are vibratory and therefore the principles that govern music govern them as well.

This study into the scientific basis of music will be the beginning of "getting down to the nitty-gritty."

The second part of the question has to do with the EFFECTS of sound and vibration on "things" and processes. SVP holds that Mind (Will, Love & Spirituality) is the initiatory cause of all phenomena and it was this force Keely worked to harness. These phenomena fall into several areas of research. These being: acoustics, heat, light, etc. or the various categorizations of vibrations in their actions and reactions on, with and through "things." A great deal of SVP is scattered throughout several fields of science. This makes it difficult for the ordinarily trained person to grasp all the points required to develop a working knowledge. For this work it is far better to have a general knowledge in many fields rather than an in depth knowledge in one field - in fact it is essential.

The third issue is about the substance of SVP - the Forty Laws of Sympathetic Vibratory Physics. Please review these for greater detail.

Adam Hobbes #fundie reaxxion.com

“The uncontested absurdities of today are the accepted slogans of tomorrow. They come to be accepted by degrees, by precedent, by implication, by erosion, by default, by dint of constant pressure on one side and constant retreat on the other—until the day when they are suddenly declared to be the country’s official ideology.”

-Ayn Rand

The public debut of “Caitlyn” Jenner represents a watershed moment for American culture. Though most have not realized it, Jenner’s coming out party constitutes a significant “trial balloon” on the part of the progressive left and the media. It is an attempt to cash in on years of carefully managed stories on transgender “discrimination,” sympathetic portrayals of transgender characters in entertainment, and the generally successful campaign of the gay rights movement and social justice activists.

The goal is simple: normalize transgenderism to such an extent that any criticism of the concept or its practitioners will not be tolerated.

They must not be allowed to succeed. Whether the silent majority of Americans realize it or not, the transgender issue represents the last best opportunity to turn the tide in the culture wars. Make no mistake: the progressives are winning. Twenty years ago a person could openly criticize homosexuality. Today, thanks to the Supreme Court, people who do not enthusiastically endorse gay marriage are branded as bigots, disqualified from high-profile business positions, and generally dismissed as ignorant hicks whose views are outside of the scope of acceptable thought.

Media outlets have already taken sides and are branding people as being “transphobic” for not accepting the idea that Bruce Jenner is now a female. It is now “bigoted” to refer to Bruce as a “he.” Even so much as joking about Jenner is verboten. The media is rallying around him, protecting him, in spite of the fact that his refusal to get sex reassignment surgery, his sexual preference for women, and his recently having killed someone in a car accident all make him a very poor candidate as the face of transgenderism.

Nevertheless, they have made him the poster boy, hoping that everyday TV watchers won’t sweat the details and that the popularity of the Kardashians will keep him relevant. The next steps include some Will and Grace style sitcom to make transgenders seem more hip and fun, adoption by the Democratic Party as the next great civil rights issue, and finally a sustained campaign of legal and private ideological bullying until transgender acceptance is the new normal.


"The Line In The Sand"

Why must we draw the line at transgenderism? I argue that legitimization of transgenderism would constitute a cultural sea change. It would be the first time the cultural fascists had succeeded in enforcing genuine doublethink. Leftist ideology regarding transgenderism not only contradicts existing progressive doctrines (feminism), but is also literally false. You are being ordered to believe in a fairy tale—the idea that a dog can transform into a cat if it just wishes for it hard enough—and this is where the danger lies.

To be clear, I do not argue that we need to persecute or hate transgenders: people have the right to choose to play dress up and freely associate with others who indulge their delusions. What we need to protect is our right to disapprove of their behavior and reject their “science.” We must dig our heels in and fight. One is reminded of Picard’s words on the Borg in First Contact:

“We’ve made too many compromises already, too many retreats. They invade our space and we fall back. They assimilate entire worlds and we fall back. Not again! The line must be drawn here! This far, no farther!”: might as well be GamerGate’s slogan.

Of course, in the film Jean-Luc eventually agrees with Lily, though this does not refute his point about the Borg. He is right when he says that repeated compromise and surrender will not work. As in any war, the longer good men wait to fight back, the more difficult it is to overcome a metastasizing and emboldened evil.

The progressives have been encouraged by traditional Americans’ reluctance to fight back due to a mixture of indifference, moral cowardice, and bemusement. They are strengthened by the tendency of mainstream society to not take them seriously, to say “Who cares about Bruce Jenner and the reality TV sideshow!”, and to think that the goodwill and tolerance extended toward progressives will be returned.

This last point is crucial when we consider the history of previous civil rights causes. Earlier progressive campaigns pertaining to issues such as women’s lib, gay rights, and miscegenation had decent libertarian justifications and did not seek to impose much on society save tolerance of alternative life choices. (Social conservatives would likely argue that there were other negative consequences.)

Transgenderism, by contrast, imposes a great deal on American society. It requires us to revisit all questions of sex segregation, everywhere from schools to sports leagues to bathrooms. And note that this is all demanded based on the softer concept, “gender,” as transgenders have all but stopped using the term “transsexual.” They understand that with current technology, sex is immutable.

Since gender is supposedly just about feelings instead of biology, transgender logic would allow any man to claim he is a woman and waltz into a women’s locker room. There is no requirement that he pass for a female, nor is there a requirement that his “feeling” be permanent.


"The Real Danger"

The biggest problem with the transgender agenda is that it erodes our right to our own minds and to our perceptions of reality. A man is not a woman merely because he believes he is one, yet the progressives would have us believe so on pain of social ostracism, loss of employment, and discrimination lawsuits. If we give progressives the right to redefine reality, then we are no better off than Winston in 1984 when he was tortured for refusing to say that 2 and 2 equal 5 (or to continue the Star Trek references, Picard when he was tortured by the Cardassians for refusing to pretend there were five lights. And isn’t it weird that “Cardassian” sounds like “Kardashian?”)

What argument could there possibly be against polygamy, pedophilia, zoophilia, or any range of (currently) unacceptable behaviors? If the legal criteria for a thing’s identity is mere belief on the part of the subject, why shouldn’t a child be allowed to have a romantic relationship with an adult if he believes himself to be an adult as well?

Children are too young to make that choice you say? Then why are there transgender children? Surely you can’t argue that a small child ought to be able to take hormones and change their gender (a decision that will have a massive impact on the rest of their lives), yet cannot consent to sex. If feelings are good enough in one case, then why not the other?

We are not only legitimizing a subculture that will invite massive legal headache and mischief upon our society, we are also establishing a criteria for said legitimacy that is so patently irrational and dangerous as to ensure an endless queue of additional subcultures will come forward seeking the same affirmation from society.

It is perhaps ironic that it is the traditionalists and conservatives that are arguing that there is more to being a woman than copying stereotypical gender norms and looking the part. To say that Bruce Jenner is a woman after a bit of surgery and makeup is degrading to the idea of womanhood. The case of Rachel Dolezal shows that black people are not especially tolerant of whites identifying as black merely because they “feel” they are. Yet there is no strong argument against transracialism if we accept transgenderism.

Given the example of Dolezal, women should be just as insulted at the pretense of someone like Bruce Jenner. Lacking the biology and differing treatment from society that comes from actually being a woman, his claim that he “has always felt like a woman” is absurd on its face. What he really feels is a compulsive desire to play dress up: to make manifest a fetishized ideal of femininity brought about by his own psychological insecurities and a “grass is always greener” presumption about life as a woman.

Transgender people suffer from a pervasive mental illness, and as a result they deserve our sympathy. There is no reason to be violent or mean toward them. Still, we should not be expected to affirm their neuroses anymore than we should affirm the beliefs of a schizophrenic who believes himself to be an alien.

The time for compromise is over. Do not apologize for “misgendering” them, do not feel bad for calling him “Bruce,” do not be afraid to make jokes about them (they say worse things about whites and Christians), and do not ever apologize for rejecting their unscientific hogwash. This noisy .001% of the population is sick and should not be allowed to dictate to the rest of us. When they tell you to move, plant yourself like a tree by the river of truth and tell them: no. You move.

Sh1v #sexist #psycho reddit.com

CMV: Revenge porn is often a fundamentally just and noble act

Hypothesis: We live in an unjust world.

Women lie. Women cheat. Women divorce-rape. Women try to gold-dig honest rich men, like myself. Women make false rape allegations. The 1/5 women will be raped shit? False rape allegation on a massive scale. Women always get away with it, of course. That's just how the world works.

But there comes a time when a man asks himself... why?

When a man is faced with a lying, cheating ex girlfriend, or god forbid, wife... when the state cuts his livelihood in half, and takes away his kids, or forces him to pay for kids who aren't even his. When he discovers the texts from Chad Alpha about how his supposedly low libido wife was greedily taking it up the ass. When he cries out for justice, and the courts and every feminist on earth tell him "Too bad. Not our problem. Pay the fuck up." ... I ask you, where can such a man turn?

TRP, of course. Allah, perhaps. But there's another option as well, which provides a visceral, direct, and immediate form of catharsis. I speak to you of the noble, even godly act that is revenge porn (and which I prefer to think of as justice porn).

You see, there is this concept called justice. It exists, even when a feminized society decides to flout it, or rebrand it as simply the destructive lashings out of angry juvenile arguably rapist men. When you wrong somebody, you are punished for it - it is as simple as that. And yet, I ask you, in our time, in our society, what punishment does the cheater recieve?

None. And in the case of women, often less than none. Cheating and stirring up a shit storm can be the makings of a solid career in the victimhood industry. That whole gamergate kerfuffle, for example. All a woman need do is fuck a solid half dozen of the men she has professional contact with, stir up controversy, post a bunch of inflated death threat claims, and then cash the fuck in. Create some bs startup about "online harassment" or what have you.

Revenge porn is simply filling the vacuum of injustice that society has created by turning profligate, unrepentant sluts into a protected class. Now, I admit, the whole process is not QUITE as satisfying as putting the offenders to death, or any of the other punishments that older, wiser societies were apt to use. But hey, it's a step in the right direction.

There are times when a man must stand up and do what is right, for himself, his country, and every amateur porn connoisseur out there, and post videos of his woman being fucked. And what harm, really? She already devalued her body by whoring herself out. She's no longer of any use, save for using for one's pleasure and then summarily discarding - and that's exactly what revenge porn is. She might claim to be offended, but she also claimed to be faithful at one point, so everything that comes from her mouth is basically irrelevant.

I'm betting most of the female stars of these juicy little videos had it coming. Liars, cheaters, divorce rapists. They should be thankful they got off this light.

So to sum up. Revenge porn. Is it legal? Maybe. Is it just? Beyond a shadow of a doubt. Is it good fap material for me personally? Indubitably.

Full disclosure: I have a folder on a certain hard drive with pics and videos of a few ex girlfriends. Nothing I'd ever release to the public, of course...unless I felt like it.

David Chase Taylor #conspiracy sites.google.com

Knights of the Ku Klux Klan
The Ku Klux Klan, commonly referred to as the KKK, was purportedly founded on December 24, 1865, by six Confederate veterans in Pulaski, Tennessee during the Reconstruction Era post American Civil War. The secret society was first known as the "Kuklux Clan", a name derived from the combination of the Greek words “kyklos” (??????), meaning “clan” and “kuklos” (??????), meaning “circle”, inferring a circle or a band of brothers. Aside from term “Knights”, which has historically been used by orders affiliated with the Roman Catholic Church, the logo of the KKK bears a Roman Cross superimposed with an icon representative of the number “6” which equates to the letter "F" or the " ?" (i.e., the double-cross) in the Roman Score (i.e., the Roman alphabet). As witnessed by the numerous KKK members who were tried and convicted decades after their respective hate crimes, the double-cross is always in play. In other words, members of the KKK are routinely sacrificed once they have fulfilled their respective missions. Fifty years after its inception, the KKK re-established itself in Atlanta, Georgia in 1915 atop Stone Mountain. Founder William J. Simmons and other were members of the Knights of Mary Phagan, a secret society likely affiliated with the Roman Catholic Church. Consequently, the organization and its chapters adopted regalia featured in “The Birth of a Nation” (1915), including white costumes, robes, masks and conical hats which are coincidentally also Greco-Roman in origin. The KKK also began to use paraphernalia adorned with a white Roman Cross on a red shield. At its peak, Klan membership reportedly exceeded 4 million and was comprised of 20% of the adult white male population. However, as of 2012, the KKK was estimated to have between 5,000 and 8,000 members and 150 Klan chapters. It is classified as a hate group by the Anti-Defamation League and the Southern Poverty Law Center. Aside from the Southern Cross of New Orleans, Knights, orders and secret societies affiliated with the KKK include but are not limited to: the Bayou Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, the Church of the American Knights of the Ku Klux Klan; the Imperial Klans of America, Knights of Mary Phagan, the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, the Knights of the White Camelia, the True Ku Klux Klan. the United Klans of America (UKA), the White Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, and the Women of the Ku Klux Klan.


KKK Under CIA Control
Similar to most secret societies (e.g., Freemasonry, Rosicrucianism, etc.), the KKK claims that it is not one organization but rather that it is composed of small independent chapters. They also claim that they never operated under a centralized structure, despite the existence of the United Klans of America (UKA), one of the largest Ku Klux Klan organizations in the U.S. which admittedly had “tens of thousands” of members. Nevertheless, modern historical sources emphatically state that “there was little organizational structure above the local level”. Klan organizers entitled "Kleagles" reportedly traveled the country, signing up hundreds of new members who paid initiation fees, receiving KKK costumes in return. Historical sources state that “The organizer kept half the money and sent the rest to state or national officials”, further confirming a top down command structure within the KKK. Whether the Fraternal Order of the Eagles is connected to the Kleagles and the KKK is not known, but they both appeared in America around the same general time. The first national leader and Grand Wizard of the KKK, Confederate General Nathan Bedford Forrest, boasted that the Klan was a nationwide organization of 550,000 men and that he could muster 40,000 Klansmen within 5 day notice. Needless to say, this would not be possible if there was no centralized structure within the Klan. Although the KKK claims to be an "invisible" group with no membership rosters, no chapters, and no local officers, in 1925 a Klansman was bribed for the secret membership list and subsequently exposed Klansmen running in the state primaries. Modern historical accounts even state that the so-called “second Klan was a formal fraternal organization, with a national and state structure”, rendering the aforementioned claims of independence obsolete. During the Civil Rights Movement in the American South, the KKK forged alliances with the police department in the South (e.g., Birmingham, Alabama) and with Southern governors (e.g., George Wallace of Alabama). The fact that they conspired with the state to commit acts of terror across the South confirms that the KKK was in fact a state-sponsored terrorist organization. According to historian Brian R. Farmer, "two-thirds of the national Klan lecturers were Protestant ministers”, a statistic which suggests that there was a federal program to incite hate across the South. It has also been revealed that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has paid informants within the Klan who were active in Birmingham in the early 1960s. In 1964, the FBI's COINTELPRO program admittedly infiltrated and disrupted civil rights groups from within while the KKK attacked them publically. In other words, the FBI and the KKK worked in unison to destroy the Civil Rights Movement which was bringing black and white people together, a threat to the establishment and the status quo. The notion that the KKK is intimately affiliated with the FBI was further confirmed when Bill Wilkinson of the Invisible Empire, Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, was revealed to have been working for the FBI. Due to the KKK’s uncanny ability to avoid prosecution for their hate crimes and their intimate relationship with the U.S. government, namely the FBI, it can be ascertained that the organization is highly organized and under command and control of the CIA of Switzerland.

KKK & Prohibition
The KKK’s allegiance to the U.S. government was never more apparent than during prohibition which decimated rural America’s self-sustainability and caused widespread economic damage the country. Historian Prendergast stated that the KKK’s "support for prohibition represented the single most important bond between Klansmen throughout the nation”. This confirms, albeit in a de facto manner, that the KKK was on the payroll of the U.S. government. In 1922, two hundred Klan members set fire to saloons in Union County, Arkansas, terrorizing the South. Their use of violence against bars, bootleggers and distilleries was widespread, working hand in hand with the U.S. government against the people of America.

KKK Legislation
In response to KKK-related violence, the U.S. federal government passed the Force Acts in 1870 and 1871 which were allegedly used to prosecute Klan crimes. However, in 1876, the Supreme Court of the United States eviscerated the Ku Klux Act in “United States v. Cruikshank” (1875) when they ruled that the federal government could no longer prosecute individuals although states would be forced to comply with federal civil rights provisions. The result was that African Americans were at the mercy of hostile state governments that refused to intervene against their own private paramilitary groups. In other words, there would be no federal prosecution of the Klan and therefore they could continue terrorizing the South as they pleased. Six years later, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in “United States v. Harris” (1882) that the Klan Act was partially unconstitutional. They stated that Congress's power under the Fourteenth Amendment did not extend to the right to regulate against private conspiracies. Again, the U.S. federal government openly allowed the Klan to operative with impunity, repealing all federal laws that could be used to prosecute them. Therefore, it must be concluded that the KKK was a federally funded program that they did not want to interrupt.

Terror Arm of Democratic Party
Evidence acquired to date indicates that the KKK was primarily used as the terror arm of the Democratic Party. According to historian Eric Foner: “In effect, the Klan was a military force serving the interests of the Democratic party…Its purposes were political, but political in the broadest sense, for it sought to affect power relations, both public and private, throughout Southern society. It aimed to…destroy the Republican party's infrastructure, undermine the Reconstruction state, reestablish control of the black labor force, and restore racial subordination in every aspect of Southern life”. According to historical sources, “The members of the first Klan in the South were exclusively Democrats”, launching a "reign of terror against Republican leaders both black and white. Those political leaders assassinated during the campaign included Arkansas Congressman James M. Hinds, three members of the South Carolina legislature, and several men who served in constitutional conventions”. The Klan also attacked black members of the Loyal Leagues and intimidated southern Republicans and Freedmen's Bureau workers. They killed black political leaders, heads of families, and leaders of churches and community groups because they had prominent leadership roles in society. In North and South Carolina alone, within an 18-month period from ending in June of 1867, there were 197 murders and 548 cases of aggravated assault”. To add insult to injury, the KKK made people vote Democratic and gave them certificates of the fact. Again, the KKK was working hand in hand with a state-sponsored political party, further confirming that they themselves were in fact state-sponsored.

KKK Cover
Although a federal grand jury determined that the Klan was a "terrorist organization” in 1870, its member remained free to terrorize the South for over a century. Reason being, the KKK was a cover for federal intelligence operation being executed in the South. If a politician or labor party leader needed to be assassinated, their subsequent murder would be blamed on the Klan. In other words, the KKK was the scapegoat for thousands of acts of state-sponsored terrorism. The notion that the KKK was nothing more than federal cover was corroborated by historical sources which state in-part: “Many people not formally inducted into the Klan had used the Klan's costume for anonymity, to hide their identities when carrying out acts of violence…While people used the Klan as a mask for nonpolitical crimes, state and local governments seldom acted against them.” The fact that the government did not prosecute said crime further confirms that the KKK was a state-sponsored organization. This notion was also substantiated by a Georgia-based reporter who wrote in 1870: "A true statement of the case is not that the Ku Klux are an organized band of licensed criminals, but that men who commit crimes call themselves Ku Klux.” Historical sources also state that: “The "Ku Klux Klan" name was used by a numerous independent local groups opposing the Civil Rights Movement and desegregation, especially in the 1950s and 1960s.”

“The Birth of a Nation”
Just prior to the Ku Klux Klan re-establishing itself atop Stone Mountain in Georgia, a film entitled “The Birth of a Nation” (1915) was released nationwide on February 8, 1915. In short, the film served as the advertisement for the new and improved KKK. The film was allegedly based on Thomas Dixon, Jr.’s book “The Leopard's Spots” (1902), as well as his book and play entitled “The Clansman” (1905). Dixon stated that his purpose was "to revolutionize northern sentiment by a presentation of history that would transform every man in my audience into a good Democrat!" In other words, his work was designed to reignite racial and political tension between the North and South along the lines of the previously fought American Civil War. In “The Clansman”, Dixon falsely claimed that the KKK had used burning crosses when rallying to fight against Reconstruction. Nevertheless, film director D. W. Griffith repeatedly portrayed an upright Roman Cross on fire in “The Birth of a Nation” rather than the St. Andrew's cross which was historically accurate. Due to the movie, a burning Roman Cross has been associated with the Klan ever since. Consequently, William J. Simmons displayed an upright burning Roman Cross atop Stone Mountain during the KKK’s second founding. Because “The Birth of a Nation” (see movie) was a Hollywood propaganda film that mythologized and glorified the Ku Klux Klan, it made the terrorist organization a household name overnight. The film is credited with single-handedly reviving the KKK in America. By portraying the Ku Klux Klan a heroic force, the film created an artificially induced Klan craze, exactly as it was designed to do. Needless to say, the movie has been used as a recruiting tool by the KKK ever since. At the official premiere in Atlanta, Georgia, members of the Klan rode up and down the street on horses in front of the theater, a publicity stunt designed to invoke fear in the South. As depicted in the movie poster for “The Birth of a Nation”, much of the modern Klan's iconography, including the standardized white costume, the white cross on a red shield, and the burning cross, were all derived from the film. Under Democratic U.S. President Woodrow Wilson, the “The Birth of a Nation” was the first motion picture to be screened at the White House. In order to create even more racial tension and turmoil in America, Wilson, a Southerner, endorsed the film. According to a Hollywood press agent, Wilson stated after watching the film, "It is like writing history with lightning, and my only regret is that it is all so terribly true”. Naturally, Wilson's alleged remarks generated a national scandal, causing Wilson’s staff issued an official denial on April 30, 1915. According to a press release from Wilson's aide, Joseph Tumulty, "The President was entirely unaware of the nature of the play before it was presented and at no time has expressed his approbation of it”. Due to its phenomenal success in causing unprecedented racial division in America, the “The Birth of a Nation” is often ranked as one of the greatest American films of all time.

Anti-Catholic Agenda
In order to publically disassociate itself from the Roman Catholic Church, it’s alleged founder and funder, the Ku Klux Klan has disseminated various forms of anti-Catholic propaganda, especially since its second founding in 1915. Shortly after the pro-KKK Hollywood propaganda film entitled “The Birth of a Nation” (1915) was released in America, the KKK suddenly focused on the impending threat of teh Catholic Church, resorting to anti-Catholicism and nativism. Although a book entitled “Klansmen: Guardians of Liberty” (1926) was allegedly responsible for fostering the Anti-Catholic sediment, it’s far more likely that the Catholic Church wanted to distance itself from the KKK after funding the aforementioned film which generated an uncontrollable and unpredictable KKK movement. In a cartoon from 1926, the Ku Klux Klan is depicted chasing the Roman Catholic Church (personified by St. Patrick) from the shores of America. The "snakes" in the cartoon are labeled with the negative attributes of the Church, including superstition, union of church and state, control of public schools, and intolerance. In another carton from 1926 entitled "The End", a KKK member is depicted with an American flag and a Bible sitting atop a fat Roman Catholic priest. Historian Roger K. Newman stated that KKK politician Hugo Black "disliked the Catholic Church as an institution" and gave over 100 anti-Catholic speeches at KKK meetings in Alabama during his 1926 U.S. senate campaign. Black was subsequently rewarded for anti-Catholic rhetoric when he was elected as a Democrat to the U.S. Senate later that year. Although Black said he left the Klan when he became a senator, it is highly unlikely. In 1937, President Franklin D. Roosevelt appointed Black to the U.S. Supreme Court despite his activity in the Klan.

KKK Bombings
During the Civil Rights Movement and the days of Martin Luther King, Jr., there were so many Klan bombings in Birmingham, Alabama, that the city's nickname was "Bombingham". During the tenure of Bull Connor, the police commissioner of Birmingham, Alabama, Klan groups were closely allied with the police and operated with impunity, showing once again that the KKK was and is a state-sponsored terrorist organization. In states such as Alabama and Mississippi, Klan members also forged alliances with the governors' administrations. When the Freedom Riders arrived in Birmingham, Connor gave Klan members 15 minutes to attack the riders before sending in the police to quell the attack. In Birmingham and elsewhere, the KKK bombed the houses of civil rights activists, also using physical violence, intimidation and executing assassinations. According to a report from the Southern Regional Council in Atlanta, the homes of 40 black Southern families were bombed between 1951 and 1952. The Ku Kulx Klan was responsible for numerous murders during the Civil Rights Movement, including but not limited to: the 1951 Christmas Eve bombing of the home of National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) activists Harry and Harriette Moore in Mims, Florida, resulting in their deaths; the 1957 murder of Willie Edwards, Jr. Klansmen forced Edwards to jump to his death from a bridge into the Alabama River; the 1963 assassination of NAACP organizer Medgar Evers in Mississippi; the 1963 bombing of the 16th Street Baptist Church in Birmingham, Alabama, which killed four African-American girls; the 1964 murders of three civil rights workers, Chaney, Goodman and Schwerner, in Mississippi; the 1964 murder of two black teenagers, Henry Hezekiah Dee and Charles Eddie Moore in Mississippi; the 1965 murder of Viola Liuzzo was transporting Civil Rights Marchers in Alabama; and the 1966 firebombing death of NAACP leader Vernon Dahmer Sr., 58, in Mississippi.

Knights of the White Camelia
The Knights of the White Camelia was purportedly founded on May 22, 1867 in Franklin, Louisiana by Colonel Alcibiades DeBlanc, a Confederate veteran. The name was derived from a snow-white flower of the genus Camellia, an apparent reference to the required skin color of its members. The secret society supported white supremacy, opposed to the Republican Party, and was very similar to the Ku Klux Klan with whom it associated with. Unlike the Klan however, which drew much of its membership from lower-class southerners and Confederate veterans, members of the Knights of White Camelia were mainly upper crust southerners, including doctors, landowners, newspaper editors, and officers. By 1870, the original Knights of the White Camelia allegedly ceased to exist. Like so many other secret societies, their alleged demise has likely been exaggerated. In other words, the Order appears to have gone undercover. Louisiana Judge Taylor Beattie, who led the Thibodaux massacre of 1887, and David Theophilus Stafford, the Louisiana adjutant general, were both member so the Order. In 1939, TIME magazine quoted West Virginian George E. Deatherage as saying that he was the "national commander of the Knights of the White Camellia", suggesting that the Order is alive and well. Based on their use of the Roman Cross and their close relationship with the Ku Klux Klan, it can be ascertained that the Order was founded and sanctioned by the Roman Catholic Church.

Southron Blood #racist stormfront.org

((Cro-Magnon)
The entire US is being browned out and you're concerned about fellow White Americans moving to the south? There is no way you're pro-white.)

- Change "Fellow white Americans" to "Yankee hordes" and the answer would be a resounding "yes". Yankee migrants - who number in the tens of millions - are a deadly threat to the survival of the South. We Southerners will very likely become extinct in the coming generations and it will mostly be because of assimilation into Americanism and dilution of our identity by mixing with the Yankee newcomers.

- I am not aware of any requirement to accept massive colonisation of my native land by outsiders in order to be pro-white, solely on the grounds that the millions of outsiders are white. The South has a long history of being both pro-white and against Yankee domination and conquest. To try to say that I can only be one or the other is completely absurd.

- The Yankee newcomers have created a culture that is alien to the South and in which Southerners are culturally and politically marginalised. The overwhelming net result of Yankee migration to the South has been a shift Leftwards in politics here. The South has long been an obstacle to the plans of the internationalists. With the South broken and ruined by assimilation, mass immigration, and loss of identity, nothing will be left in North America to block the internationalists and the white race from here to Canada will be wide open for conquest.

- The migration of Yankees to the South is a major goal of the internationalists. By supporting it, you are pushing the same things that the internationalists push. Have you ever thought that there is a reason why internationalists push Yankee migration to the South (or, for that matter, Polish immigration to Germany and Britain)?

Conclusion: Supporting mass Yankee migration to the South makes you anti-white.

((Cro-Magnon)
At this point does it matter what pieces of land a given European country holds when all of Europe including Germany is being ethnically replaced? You are not choosing your battles wisely when we currently face the greatest threat the White race has EVER faced. We are marked for extinction.)

Yes, it does matter. There is some hope for Germany awakening and leading Europe to victory at some point in the future. There is no hope for Poland doing that. There is a reason why Jews and communists supported giving German land (including most of their entire Baltic coast) to Poland.

frankenmine #conspiracy reddit.com

Corruption in gaming journalism is merely a tool by which the SJW hate movement is attempting to culturally appropriate and financially exploit western civilization. We engaged the problem from the initial angle first, but quickly realized its full scope. GamerGate activism addresses this full scope now.

Hank Junior #fundie barenakedislam.com

The War of Northern Aggression, 1861 to 1865, was a war where the South democratic rights were treated with contempt by the northern Yankee.

The vast majority in the South wanted to succeed from the Union, a Union that had been screwing them for sometime. Their will was suppressed, a people should have their democratic desires respected if the majority in a state want to succeed they should be allowed.

Yet the brutal Yankees suppressed and destroyed the great south. Our soldiers should be remembered for the great sacrifice, outnumbered 4 to 1 in manpower, 10 to 1 in GDP, no control of the sea and major nations such as France and the UK siding with the Yankees, they fought well.

Never forget that confederate spirit, it will never die.

Van Helsing #racist moonbattery.com

In response, they were beaten senseless by the mob, one of which, a 240-lb gorilla named Timothy Dixon, used a metal baseball bat.

Bukler said, "Those in the crowd were yelling, 'Hey, white boys, you're in the 'hood now!' We were yelling back, 'We don't care — we live here!'"

Yet the assault has not been labeled a hate crime, probably because only white people can be racist.

Soon Brooklyn will be like the Arab suburbs of Paris, where taxpayer money goes in, and drugs and violence come out, but there is no other interaction with society, as civilized people aren't allowed to set foot in welfare-financed no-go zones.

Jared Taylor #racist #wingnut amren.com

Is It Time for Secession?

Are the United States ripe for partition? Francis Herbert Buckley, a lawyer and academic who has taught at McGill and is now at George Mason School of Law, thinks they are. “In all the ways that matter, save for the naked force of the law, we are already divided into two nations just as much as in 1861,” he writes. “The contempt for opponents, the Twitter mobs, online shaming and no-platforming, the growing tolerance of violence — it all suggests we would be happier in separate countries.”

It’s a great step forward that a separatist can find a respectable publisher — even if it claims to sell “books for smart conservatives.” American Secession reports that there is a lot of support for separation and offers good reasons for it but, alas, only hints at the most compelling reason.

Prof. Buckley makes much of a 2018 poll that found fully 39 percent of Americans — including 42 percent of Democrats — wanted to secede. Presumably there would have been fewer secessionist Democrats under President Obama. Another 2018 poll found that 31 percent of Americans thought there would be a civil war within the next five years. I don’t take these numbers very seriously; wild talk is cheap. But I think Prof. Buckley is right to underline a recent Gallup finding that only 44 percent of Americans would be wiling to fight for their country. Surely, he is correct to say that far fewer would fight to stop an American state from seceding.

Many people think that 700,000 dead Civil War soldiers settled the question of secession, but Prof. Buckley disagrees. He argues that the Framers clearly thought the states had the right to secede. James Madison believed any attempt to keep states in by force would be wrong and “would look more like a declaration of war.” Virginia joined the United States with the express proviso that it had the right to bolt. New England states that didn’t like the War of 1812 didn’t debate the legality of secession; only whether to do it.

Abolitionist William Lloyd Garrison thought the slave-holding states should be expelled if they didn’t have the grace to leave, and wanted to hold a national Disunion Convention to expel then. On July 4, 1854, he told an Independence Day crowd that because the Constitution implicitly recognized slavery, it was “a covenant with death and an agreement with hell.” He then burned a copy, saying “So perish all compromises with tyranny!”

James Buchanan, who was president when the Southern states began to leave, believed they should not be forced to stay:

The fact is that our union rests upon public opinion, and can never be cemented by the blood of its citizens shed in civil war. If it cannot live in the affections of the people, it must one day parish.

Before South Carolina hotheads fired on Fort Sumter, even Abraham Lincoln wavered: “Would the marching of an army into South Carolina . . . without the consent of her people, and in hostility against them, be coercion or invasion? I very frankly say, I think it would be invasion.”

Prof. Buckley reminds us that even now, there is one way to leave that everyone would agree is legal. The Founders believed the federal government would never give up power voluntarily — they were right — and that’s why they wrote Article V of the Constitution. It lets the states bypass the federal government to amend or even abolish the Constitution. If 34 state legislatures agree, there will be a constitutional convention at which anything goes. If 38 states then ratify the changes, that’s the new constitution — which could recognize secession or even sanction a partition. “Secession cannot be unconstitutional,” writes Prof. Buckley, “when there’s a constitutional way of making it happen, through a constitutional convention.”

I don’t think any of that would be necessary, because the federal government wouldn’t today invade a seceding state. As I wrote nine years ago, Americans don’t have the stomach to slaughter fellow Americans just to keep their corpses within the union. If a state wanted to make a serious go of it — especially for “progressive” reasons — the coast is clear, and as Prof. Buckley notes, these days, it is lefties who promote secession.

One of the best-known breakaway movements is in California, and Mr. Trump’s 2016 victory gave it a boost. The state already has legal marijuana despite federal drug laws and it loves illegal immigrants. The “Calexit” movement is run by people who think: “California loses billions of dollars every day [in federal taxes] supporting states whose people hate us and our culture. Let’s keep our taxes in California and invest in our people first.” Prof. Buckley notes that this sounds like “California first” or even “make California great again” and almost implies an anti-conservative immigration policy. The point is, many Californians hate Donald Trump and want out.

Vermont is so full of goofy liberals it has Bernie Sanders for a senator; it has also long been a nest of secessionists.

The Cascadia movement would make an independent country out of Oregon, Washington, and British Columbia and would, as Prof. Buckley puts it “unite people with the same kinds of ideas about the environment, Starbucks and yoga.” If the President gets a second term, Prof. Buckley can imagine Democrats calling for resistance in the streets.

They already have. The manager of a Red Hen restaurant proudly refused service to White House press secretary Sarah Sanders, and a woman jostled and screamed at White House counselor Kellyanne Conway. Black congresswoman Maxine Waters then urged Democrats to mob and humiliate any Trump cabinet members they saw in public.

This is all part of the nastiness Prof. Buckley says is a sign of irreconcilable differences. Examples he cites are a 2017 article in Foreign Policy — not normally a crackpot magazine — claiming that “for the first time in America’s history, a Nazi sympathizer occupied the Oval Office.” Prof. Buckley also remembers that when Michelle Obama said that “when they [our opponents] go low we go high,” Attorney General Eric Holder corrected her: “No, no, when they go low, we kick them.” When Republican Senator Rand Paul was attacked and suffered six broken ribs and lung damage, MSNBC host Kasie Hunt laughingly said it was one of her “favorite stories.” Reporters routinely write vile stories about Republicans that would have got them fired in more civil times, but the point of today’s journalism is, in Prof. Buckley’s words, to let readers “feast on their hatreds.”

The last go at secession didn’t end well, and perhaps because he was born in Canada, Prof. Buckley understands something about it most Americans don’t: The further we get from the Civil War, the more we are supposed to revile the Confederates. The people who were actually trying to kill each other became friends. President Grant invited Robert E. Lee for a visit to the White House, and on the 50th anniversary of Pickett’s charge, veterans from both sides met on Cemetery Ridge and embraced each other. There was a popular television series, The Grey Ghost, in which Confederates were the heroes, and, as Prof. Buckley writes, “From their defeat, white southerners were permitted to retain some measure of dignity in the memory of their battlefield heroes.” Not anymore. Anything Confederate or even Southern is worse than leprosy, and “if millions of people in one section of the country are told they’re presumptively evil, and that the presumption really can’t be rebutted, they’re going to wonder if they belong somewhere else.”

But as Prof. Buckley recognizes, there is an even more testy divide: “Now the divisions are broader than North versus South. It’s liberals versus conservative and especially progressives versus Trump supporters.” “In our politics,” he adds, “we are already two nations.” One likely split would be to hive off the two coasts and leave the middle, making three countries.

That would make smaller countries, but Prof. Buckley says they would be better countries. He makes much of the fact that the people who claim to be the happiest in the world live in small countries (he ignores the fact that they live in white countries). They have governments that are close to the people and if they are homogenous, they have a sense of community. One disadvantage of big countries is that they spend more than they need to on weapons. America, China, and Russia don’t need anything like all the firepower they have, but their leaders like being able to swagger around the globe. Prof. Buckley thinks their citizens may not care. In the United States, it is the 700 to 1,000 defense-industry lobbyists — about two per congressman — who keep the defense budget fat.

The military-industrial complex is a good example of the dangers of size. Prof. Buckley argues that big countries have a lot of corruption because their governments spend huge sums people love to divert. He makes an interesting point: The kinds of political corruption that are actually illegal — bribery, extortion, mail fraud, vote-buying — are the least of our problems. Campaign contributions and lobbying are far worse, and are perfectly legal. After they leave office, about half of all congressmen become lobbyists, and make much more than they ever did as “public servants.” While they’re in office, they vote on bills with an eye to pleasing their future paymasters.

Prof. Buckley does note one clear advantage of size: free trade. Imagine, he writes, what it was like under the Articles of Confederation, with states taxing goods from other states. However, this problem could be solved through a common market of the kind that has enriched Europe.

Prof. Buckley recognizes that outright secession is unlikely, despite its advantages, so he proposes a middle ground: home rule. States would make all their own laws but leave foreign policy to the feds. All the hot issues — same-sex marriage, gun rights, abortion, public prayer, drug laws — would be thrashed out locally. If Americans were free to move to whatever state suited them, everyone could find a place to be happy.

This, is of course, was what the Founders wanted, and until the 20th century, and the federal government touched most people only when they went to the post office. Now, as Prof. Buckley points out, the feds want to run our lives for us. They are helped by a Supreme Court that has become the final arbiter of tough problems and forces the same solutions on every state. Federalism was supposed to be a compromise to get the best of both small and large government, but a ruthlessly centralizing United States is destroying all the advantages of smallness.

Home rule would be much better than what we have now. American Secession is fine as far as it goes, but it doesn’t go far enough. Prof. Buckley does note that “diversity” is not an advantage for a country, but I don’t remember a single occurrence of the word “race.” Prof. Buckley admits that at one time the country was coherent — British and Protestant — “but if we were ever that, we’re certainly not that today.” He goes on: “Our constitution has been justly admired, but it was made for a citizenry very different from the angry Americans of today.” And on: “The constitution was designed for another country, one in which people agreed on fundamental principles, and that’s not today’s America.”

What happened to yesterday’s America? Prof. Buckley gives us a hint with one of his diagnoses of why the country is splitting apart politically: “With their identity politics, the Democrats have become the intersectional party of racial and sexual minorities, of immigrants and feminists.” This is certainly true, but Prof. Buckley fails to note that the most bitter and enduring fault line is race. Instead, he trots out nonsense: “Other countries have their common cultures or religions. What America has is an idea that constitutes our identity as Americans, and that idea is liberalism in the classical sense.” The Founders would have been astounded to be told that they were starting a country with an identity that was nothing but an idea.

Prof. Buckley also argues that no secession movement would repeal civil rights laws or follow racial contours. That might be true for goofy-liberal secessionists in California or Vermont, but a split along current political-party lines, would be implicitly racial. As the partition was worked out, the racial divide might even become explicit.

It is strange that conservatives are so unwilling to recognize the importance of race while liberals, in their perverse way, are often obsessed with it. Still, this book is progress. Anyone who recognizes that people are better off separate — for whatever reason — is preparing the way for the kind of racial separation that many whites yearn for.

Leovictor #wingnut deviantart.com

This is what happens when higher education opens the door to Psychopaths.
The "professor" who came up with this idea wouldn't look out of place in the Grim Adventures Of Billy & Mandy

(Video by Sargon)

This is how "journos" at VICE write articles.
(Still an ardent supporter of "Learn To Code" here)

https://www.deviantart.com/users/outgoing?https://twitter.com/MrSlouch134/status/1226112769239474176

Extra.

CHINA NUMBA ONE!!!

Coronavirus: WHO chief warns against 'trolls and conspiracy theories'

https://www.deviantart.com/users/outgoing?https://www.bbc.com/news/world-51429400


From the same Traitors of the West who gave us this:

https://www.deviantart.com/users/outgoing?https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-health-who/who-says-countries-should-keep-borders-open-trade-people-moving-despite-coronavirus-idUSKBN1ZU1C2


Keep sucking that China Peepee WHO.

Brian Niemeier #conspiracy brianniemeier.com

Going back even further, the Protestant Reformation is often credited to the printing press, but the same technology helped ignite one of the longest and bloodiest conflicts in European history.

It's no different today. The low-work, high-pay, incestuous character of the contemporary newsroom has just made the propagandists worse at hiding their intentions.

The latest spate of shootings by atheist Leftists egged on by fedposters is a great example. Five minutes on any news channel or social media feed will show you that the mainstream media is using these crimes as a handy club to beat white people--which the shooters were--and Christian conservatives--which the shooters were not.

So eager were the priests of the ruling death cult to condemn their sworn enemies that they were easily and hilariously duped, at length, by an obvious prankster.

It should be self-evident by now, but the mass media isn't there to inform you. Its purpose is to keep people in a constant state of low-grade panic--fluctuating within tolerances.

Why keep everyone afraid? Ask any accomplished salesman. Scared people don't think rationally. They're far more suggestible and manipulable. Watch any insurance commercial.

What the Boomers miss are the days when the media would openly use this tactic to sell beer and toothpaste while keeping the real propaganda subtle. Now that the entire TV ad revenue model has been proven fraudulent, the corresponding decline in journo IQ has torn the curtain away from their whole operation.

While you're better off not consuming news at all, here's a surefire way to tell if you're being manipulated. Is the lead story about some massacre/accident/natural disaster three states over? If so, and unless you have family in the affected area, the news is irrelevant. Act accordingly.

bhparkman #fundie debbieschlussel.com

The wife and I homeschool our children with great results. How are they going to enforce this multicultralism bull-plop in our home? I dare them to try.

We have no fears of terrorists taking over the bus our kids could be on, no fears of school shootings, no fears of indoctrination, no fear of our kids parenting the teacher's child - I can on for hours.

Just recently, some District slag tried to give us a hard time claiming that our kids would suffer socialy from homeschooling. After a slight debate (I was civil, she was going off on rants), I finally realized why the public and private school folks constantly bring this up - they don't warn of developmental problems; they threaten it. She threatened us with blackballing.

Our family has consistantly yelled at local government to stop stealing our money to fund their illegal activities like public education and welfare. They just brush us off 'til election season. Then they act like "Huh? We brushed you off?" and then say whatever they think we want to hear to get our vote.

If the Islamofacists think they can enforce their psychobabble in our home where I am Lord-Protector and Heavenly Father fights our battles; then they'd better be ready for a fight!

Nagato #fundie reaxxion.com

Can't help but agree; we need to march towards Ragnarok instead.

We don't need to prove our moral superiority, because we already know we have it. A rational creature has no need for validation by an emotional one.

By now all of this feels somewhat akin to white knighting for a girl that has already shown no interest in you, where you know it's a massive waste of time and money all in the name of... thinking you have a chance at getting something you've failed to get many times before?

No, we - Gamergate as a whole - need to alpha up instead. Hell might have no fury like a beta scorn, but that still leaves us as a beta, and who takes those seriously to begin with? The whole Nice Guy™ thing isn't doing us any favors, and thusly we need to self-improve instead.

"The Rebuild Initiative" - which I consider this site to be a part of - is a step in the right direction. Our opponents might only be able to leech onto something successful, but we can create it ourselves, and that makes us mighty. Promoting sites like RXN and Nichegamer is one thing, but we need to go beyond that: it's about time get some actual game projects going and attain a proper foothold from which to the greater gaming community.

Doesn't matter whether it's self-funded by the bigger names already among us or Kickstarted, we need to finally have genuine talent flying our flag; not just bloggers and Twitter celebs, but those capable of creating successful products in our beloved medium, and use those to openly subvert and destroy our opponents' intended censor.

Now pick up that hammer and become the gods you were meant to be.

Murica1488 #racist niggermania.net

The Nigger Bakkatball Association could go with the NFL. These ignoranus niggers have way to much to say like LeBoon calling Trump a bum. If LeBoon wasn’t making millions playing playground games, where would he be? A bum looking for handouts and muh dicks.

All these months I’ve been wondering why niggers hated Trump since he never actually said anything about them. Today I came to the realization after 8 years of Obongo s big nigger lips sucking their dicks over every thing they felt bad about, they can’t take someone calling them on their bullshit.

Sports is one of humanity’s last hopes. It’s a huge business. Stop going, stop watching, the owners will realize why. Then they have two choices, blackball all niggers or keep them in their place like we used to.

doclove #fundie the-spearhead.com

Look at reality. Our American Republic has been under durress since the Seneca Falls meeting in 1848. They managed to change the divorce laws for the American Civil War Veterans 1861-64. Before this, if there was a divorce, the man got the house and the children unless something was seriously wrong with him. Divorce rates were only a measley one percent and a spouse still had to prove fault and it wasn’t easy to get a divorce and not everyone could get one. Divorce rates rose to 10% by the end of the First World War, and why shouldn’t they as women usually got the house and kids even under a fault system. Then just in time for the Vietnam War, the divorce laws were changed to no fault and the wife still got the house and kids like it was after the American Civil War unless something was seriously wrong with her. After the Vietnam War, marriage was a man’s fool game tp play and to be honest after the American Civil War it was starting to get a little bad too.

As most of you know, I’m a 43 year old White man and a Christian and a Catholic as well as an U.S. Army Veteran of Iraq and Afghanistan. I’m also a bit of an amatuer historian. The Roman Republic rose for two imporatant reasons although they weren’t the only ones but I believe they were crucial. Enforced monogamy even if the husband but not the wife was allowed in practice if not theory to commit adultry. Pater Potentas, Father’s power, was the other reason. A man had a right to harm or kill his wife, children even unmarried adult female children, adult male children even if theoretically elected to the highest office of the Republic, Consul. He also had the right to harm or kill his grandchildren and great grandchildren. He had the right to harm or kill his descendants wives, slaves, his descendants slaves, his descendants wives slaves or any freed slave by him or them. He had a right to do this without being questioned. Not even the Taliban would allow such a thing as a man needs sufficient reason to do so. When these rights were lost by the Roman Empire among other reasons as well, Rome started to eventually lose. The same process is happening in the USA and we had a much more pleasant patriarchy for the Females even before 1860 than the Roman Republic ever did. As I said above even the Taliban was more pleasant to females than the Roman Republic which our founding fathers based much of our American Republic on. Although it emotionally and in a moral Christian Catholic sense offends even me, in order to halt and reverse our decline we may need to reinstitute some Ancient Roman Republican laws. There’s a reason the Roman Republic crushed all before it, even after suffering fearsome losses in battle and horrific defeats. I see no other logical way. By the way I’m of Polish and Irish descent and not of Italian descent. For as painful as it is for me to admit this, I logically can see no other way to prevent the coming collapse. If someone disagrees with me, please logically prove me wrong as emotionally and morally I would accept and love it. I mean this.

The Mad Jewess #conspiracy themadjewess.net

Did Lincoln Introduce Communism & Socialism To America? Strong Evidence Suggests So

So, why do the “Progressives” hate the south so much? Why do they want to silence the southern people and take their flag? It’s not because of supposed ‘racism’ because the north had more slaves than the south. True, there are hard core white racists, but they have always been a minority, not a majority. One thing that Communists hate: Is to be exposed. Which is the real reason that Communists hate the southerners. They fear being exposed regarding the truth about the Civil War. Communists also despise the southerners because they are patriotic. Communist/Progressives hate patriotism. They loathe country and always have.

My husband and I both attended Elementary schools on Long Island. What did we learn? By 1979, I was already in 9th grade. The only thing I learned about the “Civil war” was this: Lincoln fought to free the slaves & was the greatest President ever. The Confederate flag is evil and so are southerners. Basta, end of story. That’s all she wrote. That’s all they teach up north.

In the age of the internet, we can, however – find truths. For eg., the ’48ers’. The 48ers were Communist Revolutionaries who brought Communist and Socialistic terror to Europe: REVOLUTIONS OF 1848 (PDF file) They moved to America after Revolutions in EU failed. They had to succeed somewhere. They were agitators. Liberals have always been alive and well, seeking to destroy nations. SO:

Ask yourself why did the Union Army have foreign, German Generals, Colonels, Lt Colonels? Why? Because they had already been part of the European Revolutions. The goal for America in 1861 had nothing to do with slaves. Zero. They used abolition as a ‘watchword’ to gain sympathy from the country. Remember, Communists are good with buzz-words..

Mike King #racist tomatobubble.com

Trumpstein's declaration of war and call for a boycott on the NFL & NBA represent a classic case of a clever politician doing the right thing, but for the wrong reasons. With his conservative / nationalist core constituencies shrinking due to his tiresome buffoonery, leftward movement and broken promises, this calculated move to fire-up the patriotard base may turn out to be a stroke of political genius for Ivanka's daddy. Though Sugar and I, er, "The Editorial Board" of The Anti-New York Times can see right through the Orange Clown's tactical trickery, any damage done to the National Felons League will come as a welcome side-effect.

Yes, it's high time that these Jewish-run leagues and their stables of ungrateful, whiny, low-IQ, anti-White, spoiled-rotten multi-millionaire, deadbeat dad brats be taught a lesson by the lazy fat White guys who attend their games, purchase their merchandise and watch them on the Idiotic Box. And to whatever extent that a sports boycott ends up re-focusing Boobus Footballicus attention on matters political, something good may actually come out of this -- maybe. Let the leagues die and let the protesting punks work as dishwashers, janitors, busboys, pimps and crack dealers --- those who don't end up dead or in prison within a few months, that is.

"Yo man...the anthem be racist."

One can only imagine how many fatherless Black kids these notoriously promiscuous multi-millionaire morons have sired and abandoned. They are also notorious for blowing millions of dollars of women, drugs, and extravagance, while doing little if anything to offer financial support or mentoring in the "oppressed" ™ Black communities.

As for the libtarded whining about Trumpstein's "divisiveness," it is important to note that these childishly provocative anthem-protests began in 2016 as a direct consequence of the relentless, multi-year incitement against innocent police officers by Mr. & Mr. Obongo and the rest of the usual suspects above and below them. The meaning of the circus has since morphed into a protest of "racism" ™ in general. A bit of essential chronology is called for here:

2009: Obongo publicly accused the Cambridge, MA police of "acting stupidly" for arresting Black Communist Harvard professor Henry Gates after Gates began abusing police officers merely for questioning him as to why he was breaking into a home. The pinko professor could easily and calmly have explained that he was the new rightful renter of the property who had lost his keys, and then shown them his documents. Instead, he chose to make a public spectacle in the exclusive neighborhood.

2012: Obongo took up the cause of a Black thug named Trayvon Martin who was killed by George Zimmerman, an armed neighborhood watchman who shot Martin in self-defense as the drugged up "teen" was bashing Zimmerman's head into the pavement. Said Obongo of the dead beast: "If I had a son, he'd look like Trayvon."

2014: Obongo made a Federal case of another justified killing of a thug that occurred in Ferguson, MO. A 6'5"- 300 pound beast, Michael Brown, had to be put down by White Officer Darren Wilson after he had robbed a convenience store and then tried to kill Officer Wilson. Obongo's surrogates, the Reverend Al Charlatan and the Black Lives Matter terrorist group, then incited riots as Obongo's Attorney General, Eric Holder, persecuted the Ferguson police department.

2016: Clad in black leather and draped with bullets, the glorified go-go girl skank Beyonce, who is as "as thick as thieves" with Mr. & Mr. Obongo, used the occasion of the Stupor Bowl to pay a half-time tribute to the cop-killing Communist Black Panthers.

Building upon the sustained hate campaign against police -- an evil effort that actually led to the execution murders of several police officers nationwide -- San Francisco 49ers Quarterback Colin Kaepernick -- a mulatto who was raised by a loving White family after his Black biological father disappeared (so typical!) -- began dropping to one knee instead of standing before the National Anthem. When asked to comment on the controversy, Obongo actually defended the anthem protest:

"I don’t doubt his (Kap's) sincerity. I think he cares about some real, legitimate issues that have to be talked about. If nothing else, he’s generated more conversation about issues that have to be talked about... “I’d rather have young people who are engaged in the argument and trying to think through how they can be part of our democratic process than people who are just sitting on the sidelines not paying attention at all,”

Kap's anti-White / anti-cop antics have since spread to other teams and other sports. So you see, it was the administration of Mr. & Mr. Obongo, backed by the promotion of the all-mighty Judenpresse, not Orange Man, that started this whole divisive nastiness.

Frankly, this trite tradition of playing the National Anthem before every single sports game is a malignant form of self-worship that was instituted at baseball games on the suggestion of Woodrow Wilson. The purpose was to whip up fake patriotism for World War I -- a tragic event fought only for the benefit of Globalism and Zionism. Even back then, "they" (cough cough) understood the power of sports.

If players were to take a knee to protest something real, such as the America's political and military oppression of the world, or the erosion of liberty here at home, we would strongly support that. But because these idiotic protests are motivated solely by bigotry against Whites and blind hatred against police officers, The Anti-New York Times, - in spite of Trumpstein's manipulative personal motives in calling for it, wholeheartedly endorses the "mancott" of the NFL and NBA. So, these disrespectful, hateful, bigoted ass-clowns want to drop to one knee, eh? Then the big bad White man needs bring the whole damn pack of them to their metaphorical knees, financially.

In the vernacular of ghetto thuggery: "Let's tear the mutha down!"

The drunken little White boys in fat men's bodies need to sober up, grow up, shape up and fight for something real!

Boobus Americanus 1: I read in the New York Times today that Trump is calling for a boycott of the NFL.

Boobus Americanus 2: That's so divisive. Football is our national game.

Sugar: No Boobuss! Defending frickin' cop killerss and biting the hand that feedss you is what'ss divissive!

Editor: White Sport-tards who turn a blind eye to this have no self-respect.

Brian Niemeier #fundie #mammon brianniemeier.com

The man in the picture above was accused of sexual assault by conniving Jezebel Zoe Quinn. Are the allegations true? We'll never know because he's dead now. Game developer Alec Holowka killed himself on Saturday morning. His suicide followed his public drumming out of the industry as a result of Quinn's accusations.

Quinn, it should be noted, is the predatory tart whose escapades may have incited #GamerGate. Since then she's ridden the professional victimhood gravy train, raising $80,000 for a Kickstarter she failed to deliver on, landing a writing gig at Vertigo which helped kill the imprint, and failing upward to another writing job at Marvel.

[...]

If I were Holowka's next of kin, I would file a wrongful death suit against Zoe Quinn. But I'm not, and she is unlikely to see the inside of a courtroom. The human hunger for perfect justice despite its absence from this world testifies to the reality of divine justice.

Unlike Literally Who, I've delivered on every promise I made to my backers. Support independent creators. Back Combat Frame XSeed: CY 40 Second Coming today!

[In the comments section…]

xavier: Her twitter name and the image are very telling. Unburnt witch and a pentagram image. Striking no? I look at her and fear God's divine justice. That could be me too.

Niemeier: It's convenient when they waive the witch test and just declare their allegiance openly.

TheTruthNoOneWan ts #racist topix.com

AMERICA ONLY AVERAGED 45 YEARS OF SLAVERY (FACT)

Some stupid congressman wanted slave reparations.
He listed slavery has being from 1600 to 1870 something.

REALITY CHECK:
In 1775, We sent the King of England a letter, declaring our independence.
That was the first act of treason
.
The second act of treason was several Northern states didn't like slavery,they despised it.
Many of the Northern states IMMEDIATELY passed Emancipation laws.
They said no more buying, selling, or trading of slaves.
If your slave has a child, then that child is a free person.
If a slave owner dies, his slave is set free.(Yes, It's a shame all states didn't do it).

In 1776 we were at war with Great Britain, and that war lasted to 1786.
George Washington became our first President of the United states in the 1788 Election and took office just like every other president in 1789.

1788 was the year the British flag was taken down from America, and the American flag raised.
This was the year we became a country.

In 1861 We went to war with the south to end that Slavery.
That's 72 years after we became a nation.
During that time half the Nation had slaves.
Hence, America averaged 36 years of slavery.
But those who want to argue.
I just proved America only had 72 years of it.
Then America traveled the world, to end slavery world wide.
That's why we have several Caribbean Islands has territories.
The Spanish American war of 1900.
We paid $25 Million dollars for those islands and then Free'd all the slaves at the signing of the Paris treaty.

America has always been a champion of freedom.
If a Black man really wants to know how smart he is? Just go visit Africa.
Thats where every Black person would be if they didn't get the gift of America.
Many of them would still be enslaved over there.

michael louwen #fundie #dunning-kruger christiannews.net

You are actually agreeing with me that the 1964 Civil Rights Act does not apply to or protect the gays/LGBTQs from discrimination in public accommodations.

The 1776 US Constitution enacted the "separation of Church and State" policy, not the separation of Mosque/Temple and State.

The 1776 US Constitution also prohibited the powerful US government from restricting her citizens' rights to freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom to protest peacefully to seek redress and freedom to bear arms. In theory, this protection applied to Christian and non-Christian citizens. But in 1776, nearly all US citizens were Whites and/or Christians = about 99%, ie no Moslems or Hindoos.

In the early 1800s, Blacks were brought into USA as slaves, mostly to work in the cotton fields in the South. In 1861, the mostly Christian White citizens killed each other over slavery and politics and were henceforth split into Northern White liberals and Southern White conservatives = became perennial enemies. And 1 century later, US citizens would include sizable numbers of Moslems and Hindoos who were mostly immigrated into USA by the vote-pandering White liberals of the Blue States in the North and West.

Rayburne F. Winsor #fundie postmillennialworldview.com

I once posted a long comment on a similar article by Randy Alcorn entitled: Do you believe God created the universe in six literal (24 hour) days? I certainly do. I really am not concerned with how many (is it 38%) “evangelical Christians are compromising the truth of God’s Word regarding the sex literal (24-hour) days of creation in Genesis by bowing down to scientific opinion (“from the goo, through the zoo, to you” evolution) that accommodates millions of years to the days of Genesis rather than the clear,straightforward , literal meaning of six literal (24-hour) days in Genesis. There is no warrant biblically, scientifically or linguistically for doing so (from the perspective of the ancient Hebrew language). I have posted many long comments why I oppose theistic evolution (accommodating long ages to the literal days of Genesis) as not biblical. Jesus Christ himself accepted the Genesis account of creation (Matthew 19:4), including the supernatural creation of Adam and Eve, as well as the biblical account of Noah’s Flood (which would radically alter everything modern uniformitarian geologists have learned in Geology) as historical fact (Matthew 19:: 4, Matthew 24:37-39). We should not be surprised by this when we remember that, though many leading scientists (i.e. “scriptural geologists”) resisted the “old earth” ideas of James Hutton and Charles Lyell (Uniformitarianism) and defended scripture as both true and scientific, Regrettably, it was Christians, not evolutionary scientists, who first lead the charge against scripture, beginning in the 1800s when theologians (theistic evolutionists) readily adopted the “old earth” ideas, of Lyell (uniformitarianism) instead of Noah’s Flood. The Bible believing scientists of the day were in a difficult position of trying to defend scripture when even theologians (who compromised the literal history of Genesis) were against them. The situation remains even worse today, despite recent scientific discoveries about the universe, atom, the internal structure and incredible complexity of cells, DNA, the natural world, etc. Believing scientists, though understandably still in a minority, are leaving Darwinian Evolution, recognizing that strictly natural processes, operating at random on inorganic chemicals, could never have produced complex living cells. Unfortunately, though they have grown weary of arguing how random mutations (essentially harmful to a living organism) in a highly complex genetic code provide improvements to it (no functional genetic information-increasing changes on which “goo to you” evolution depends). So, what do they do? They re-adopt Creation, but still hold on to the old earth and formulate a local Flood account to fit modern uniformitarian geology. How much better it would (and I believe employ better science) to come all the way back to a biblical worldview (instead of just a halfway or middle position between biblical creation and natural evolution (Theistic evolution).. See other comment below:

One could write a book on why it is imperative that Bible-believing Christians not compromise the historical truth of Genesis 1 ( i.e. Day-Age theory, Gap theory, Framework Hypothesis theory) by adding or accommodating evolution to the Genesis account. First, theistic evolution, which is just evolutionary development with God added on, is diametrically opposed to supernatural, ex nihilo (out of nothing), , fiat, (divinely spoken Word\) creation, which even Darwin, who was also a divinity student, rejected: In a letter he wrote to Charles Lyell in 1861, he stated: “The view that each variation has been providentially arranged seems to me to make Natural Selection entirely superfluous, and indeed takes the whole case of the new species out of the range of science” . Not only was theistic evolution rejected by Darwin, but also was never seriously considered by the other founding fathers of evolution. The evolutionary claim of an old earth (4.5 billion years old) denies the veracity of the first 11 chapters of Genesis regarding the order of creation (contrary to evolution, the Bible says birds were created on Day 5 at the same time as the sea creatures –before dinosaurs and other land animals; the Bible says the work of shaping the earth was finished on Day 3 before the moon was made on the 4th day into earth’s creation, not smashed from the earth in a cataclysmic collision; etc.), the distinctness of created kinds (10 times in Genesis 1), the absence of death and bloodshed before the Fall (see Genesis 3; Romans 5:12), the instantaneous creation of Adam and Eve and all of creation functionally mature (which explains the appearance of age), the “very good” status of the creation at the end of the creation week (Genesis 1:31), the great longevities of the patriarchs, and the global nature of the Flood, as attested by over 200 Flood traditions by peoples all around the world, over 30 scriptural references (indicating universality of Great Flood), and layers of water-deposited sedimentary rocks containing separate and distinct and intact kinds of fossilized plants, birds, animals, etc. (not transitional or intermediate fossil) all over the earth.

Every major doctrine of Christianity stands or falls upon the historical foundation laid in the first 11 chapters of Genesis. Obviously, if death were here eons before Adam sinned (Genesis 3), as evolution requires, then creation had already been spoiled and death is not the penalty for sin, as scripture plainly teaches (Genesis 2:16; Romans 5:12). This, in turn, means that Christ’s death and resurrection were ineffective and meaningless, and the biblical teaching (Romans 8:18-23; Rev. 21) of the final restoration (Paradise Regained) of this fallen world to its original state before the Fall (only much more magnificent and glorious)–no sin, no death. no curse–is sheer nonsense. Dr. James Barr, formerly Oriel Professor of the Interpretation of Holy Scripture at Oxford University and renown as one of the world’s leading Old Testament Hebrew scholars , wrote, “So far as I know, there is no professor of Hebrew or Old Testament at any world class university who does not believe that that the writer (s) of Genesis 1-11 intended to convey to their readers the ideas that creation took place in a series of six days which were the same as the days of 24 hours we now experience.” The word “day” (Hebrew yom) associated with a numeral (i.e. “first day” “second day,” “third day” in Genesis 1 (and that used 359 times in the Old Testament outside of Genesis 1 ) always means a literal 24-hour day. 

To make sure that no one missed the obvious meaning of a literal 24-hour day, the writer (s) of Genesis 1 under inspiration of the Holy Spirit further qualifies “first day, ” “second day” etc. with “evening and morning”–“and the evening (that part of the day associated with darkness) and morning (that part of the day associated with light) were the first day” (“second day, “third day” etc.). But many who are easily embarrassed (yes, that includes genuine Christians and theistic evolutionists like Dr. John Lennox, astronomers like Hugh Ross and others) by the opinions of secular scientists concerning the unproven assumptions of radiometric dating (which has been off by hundreds of thousands/millions of years, even on rocks of known age) will claim that Genesis 1 and other creation passages are myths, parables, poetry, dramas, allegories or analogies–the only exceptions to the perspicuity of scripture and cardinal rule that “context defines the meaning of a word”—anything, in order to escape the obvious fact that they are written, and read as, a straightforward historical narrative.
 
Even such astounding scholars as Dr. E. J. Young of Westminister Seminary in Philadelphia, an authority of massive erudition in Hebrew and cognate languages holds that “Genesis is not poetry. There are poetical accounts of creation in the Bible–Psalm 104, and certain chapters in Job, and they differ completely from the first chapter of Genesis. Hebrew poetry had certain characteristics, and they are not found in the first chapter of Genesis.” He further states: “The man who says I believe that Genesis purports to be an historical account, but I don’t believe that account” is a far better interpreter of the Bible than the man who says, “I believe that Genesis is profoundly true, but it is poetry”. The inspired, infallible Word of God trumps the opinion (actually “faith”) of fallible scientists, my friend. Don’t undermine or sell out the firm foundation (Genesis 1-11) on which your Christian faith is based, my friend, for the favor and praise of men. God will reward you in due time for your faithfulness to His inspired, infallible Word. God bless.

CH #fundie heartiste.wordpress.com

The gaydar AI algorithm would peg this face [picture of Mary Wollstonecraft] as a rugmuncher mug.

Wollstonecraft married, but in the 18th Century it would have been common for lesbians and gays to marry into heterosexual relationships.

The origin of modern feminism — the particularly nasty and virulent form of feminism that seeks to invert the sexual market to the perceived benefit of ugly women by removing all constraints on female sexuality and stripping moral agency from women, while maximally restricting and pathologizing male sexuality and burdening men with all moral responsibility — was disproportionately a Jewish and ugly woman movement. The book that begat modern feminism was The Feminine Mystique, by Jewish woman Betty Friedan.

What followed in Friedan’s wake was a freak parade of uglier and uglier women fronting the modern feminist agenda, and enacting their warped vision of the sexes into policy (e.g. Title IX).

Steve Sailer argues feminism is a WASP concept, and 20th Century Jewish immigration and dominance in media and Hollywood actually delayed the triumph of feminism (seen in the WASPs passing Female Suffrage and Prohibition), because Jewish men, like all Semitic men, evolved in a patriarchal and ethnocentric culture and didn’t see a need to extend respect to shiksas.

Maybe proto-feminism is WASPy, but that doesn’t explain the Jewishness of modern feminism, unless one considers Jewish feminism an ethnic-scale case of intratribal negative transference. Jewish female feminists were rebelling against their patriarchal religion (and seething with resentment against their Jewish men lusting after pretty Gentile women), but as is the wont of their tribe they organized their resistance around defiance of the Gentile soft-patriarchy culture of comfortably accepted sex roles and sex-based preferences, instead of targeting their attacks against their own Swinesteins. They transferred the cause of their bad feelings onto the contemptible goyium.

Jewish-led feminism was actually a reaction to their own anti-feminist ethnic culture. But since Jewish men, like all men, are more interested than are women in acquiring status and power to exchange for sex, the heights of industries like Hollywood filled with patriarchal Jewish men instead of feminist Jewish women.

That’s not the end of the story. Jewish men eventually caught on that hypocritically espousing the radical feminism of their tribeswomen was a great stick with which to beat goy society and poison relations between Gentile men and their women….and also to fool naive feminists into bed using the “Hugo Schwyzer” male feminist ruse. If you’re a casting couch sleazebag running a de facto brothel for skanky actress wannabes, posturing like a champion of women’s lib is an effective way to keep the heat off you and your whores satisfied with a pittance of hush money and empty promises.

When one sees feminism, and especially modern feminism, through the lens of homosexuality, ugliness, and Jewishness, the tenets and demands of the twisted ideology begin to make sense.

Lesbians resent men. They love feminism because they want to be men in every way that matters, and that means they have a stake in undermining sex-differentiated norms and even sexual dichotomy.

Lesbian Feminism is the agenda of making unfeminine women into second rate men rather than first rate women.

Ugly women resent pretty women. They love feminism because they want to reduce the competitive advantages pretty women enjoy by enforcing equality and uniformity among women. Ugly women also love feminism because they understand on a deep level that they are too ugly to find a provider husband and must pursue careerism to collect the resources themselves.

Ugly Woman Feminism is the agenda of pitting the bottom quarter of women against the top three quarters of women.

Jewish women resent their patriarchal culture and Gentile social norms. They love feminism because it subverts the traditions of their ethnic religion and gives them cover to corrupt the benignly sex-differentiated Christian culture which largely rejects the radical value system of Jewish women.

Jewish Feminism is the agenda of delegitimizing patriarchal Judaism/Semitism and of poisoning the benevolent sexism of Christian Gentile culture.

Put those three origins of modern (and proto-) feminism together — the lesbian, the ugly, and the Jewish — into one monstrous frankenshrew, and you get intersectional insanity like “white male privilege”, the UVA rape hoax scandal, and the constant invocation of the mythological discriminatory “wage gap“. Not to mention the gross anti-male injustice known as the family court industrial complex.

PS Even WASP feminism is tainted in origin. Prohibition was a failure, and Female Suffrage has inarguably shifted America politically leftward and into the waiting petri dish of Poz.

Gregory Hood #racist amren.com

Scandinavian Airlines Erases Scandinavian Identity

“Once any group has been stripped of their identity and existence in theory, it is only a matter of time before someone will seek to strip them of their existence literally,” wrote Joel Richardson.

“Whiteness is not a culture,” said the late Noel Ignatiev, “but a privilege and exists for no reason other than to defend it.” He wanted to “abolish the white race,” but said this was a political project, not a call to genocide. “Perhaps AR should publicly call for the destruction of the black race,” wrote Michael Levin, “and then explain that this is just a way of criticizing affirmative action.”

Ignatiev at least said “Italian culture” and “Irish culture” are real. Today, even that may be politically incorrect.

“What is truly Scandinavian?” asked a recent ad from Scandinavian Airlines (SAS). “Absolutely nothing.”

“There is no such thing,” say two girls in the ad.

Posted on February 26, 2020Scandinavian Airlines Erases Scandinavian Identity
Gregory Hood, American Renaissance, February 26, 2020

“Once any group has been stripped of their identity and existence in theory, it is only a matter of time before someone will seek to strip them of their existence literally,” wrote Joel Richardson.

“Whiteness is not a culture,” said the late Noel Ignatiev, “but a privilege and exists for no reason other than to defend it.” He wanted to “abolish the white race,” but said this was a political project, not a call to genocide. “Perhaps AR should publicly call for the destruction of the black race,” wrote Michael Levin, “and then explain that this is just a way of criticizing affirmative action.”

Ignatiev at least said “Italian culture” and “Irish culture” are real. Today, even that may be politically incorrect.

“What is truly Scandinavian?” asked a recent ad from Scandinavian Airlines (SAS). “Absolutely nothing.”

“There is no such thing,” say two girls in the ad.

The ad says Scandinavian traditions and achievements came from elsewhere. “We’re no better than our Viking ancestors,” explains a black man.

image

The ad doesn’t say why SAS is a good airline. The ad is pure Woke Capital — a company pushing politics. If you know about Stonetoss, you’re probably thinking about his “Burgers?” cartoon.

image

The ad insults Scandinavians in three ways.

Scandinavians have no culture except what they took from others. “In a way,” says the narrator, “Scandinavia was brought here.”

Scandinavian identity belongs to everyone. Non-whites, including the black Viking, represent Scandinavia.

Finally, the few Scandinavian achievements the ad finds worth mentioning are egalitarian projects, including “our democracy” and “women’s rights” — but Scandinavia can’t claim these either. The ad credits democracy to ancient Greece and women’s suffrage to America. (Of course, linking modern Scandinavia to ancient Greece admits there’s a larger Western, white culture that goes back millennia.)

The ad doesn’t mention Scandinavian explorers, composers, novelists, commanders, or scientists.

The good news is that people hated the ad. On YouTube, about 13,000 people “liked” the ad, while 112,000 “disliked” it.

Danish People’s Party foreign affairs spokesman Soeren Espersen said SAS “spit on us.” “What nonsense and self-hatred,” said Swedish Democrats secretary Richard Jomhof on Facebook.

SAS pulled the ad from its website but didn’t apologize. It vowed to continue the campaign and released a shorter version with the same message. It said the problem wasn’t the ad, but the people who didn’t like it.

Some media agreed. “4chan Trolls Target Scandinavian Airlines With Racist Harassment Campaign,” said Mother Jones, comparing the flap to the “coordinated harassment campaign” of Gamergate. LoyaltyLobby, which tracks travel loyalty programs, said the controversy was “made up.” Aftonbladet’s Jenny Wennberg’s blamed Russian propaganda and said “only an idiot” would object to the claim “Scandinavia was brought here bit by bit.” Expressen cited reports that the criticism came from “hate sites,” the “extreme right,” and Russia.

Blaming “trolls” or “Russia” is a way to claim any opposition to the ad was fake. It’s true that the Russian outlet Sputnik posted an article about the ad on February 12. However, Twitter users were protesting the ad before that.

No national airway of any non-white country would ever say its people had no culture. No company would ever say a non-white race, region, or country had no culture. McDonalds, Target, and Disney and scores of other companies celebrate Black History Month. The film Black Panther invented fictional history to make blacks feel better. If whites adopt black, Hispanic, or Asian traditions, non-whites accuse them of “cultural appropriation.” Somehow, a black man claiming “Viking ancestors” is fine.

The SAS controversy may seem small, but it’s part of our race’s central problem. Those with financial and political power seem to think we shouldn’t have anything of our own. If we have no culture, why should we have countries? Journalists and academics can call “The Great Replacement” a conspiracy theory because there’s nothing there to be replaced.

This is why white identity isn’t just about biology, pride, or politics. It’s about survival. The SAS ad wasn’t just an insult. It was a warning.

David J. Stewart #fundie #sexist jesusisprecious.org

You know, what Harvest Baptist Church on Guam has done to me reminds me of an eerie episode of The Twilight Zone. A man had planned ahead, by building a nuclear survival shelter under his home. He had told all his neighbours about it, but they all mocked and laughed at him for years. But then one evening on the news, it was reported that Russia was about to launch a massive nuclear strike against the United States! The man took his wife and children and locked themselves into the underground bunker shelter. His neighbours came by the droves, begging to be let in. When the man kindly explained that there was only enough room and supplies for his own family, his neighbours became threatening and violent. They started trying to find ways to break in. They brought power tools, and made all kinds of threats, terrorizing the poor man and his family. At the end of The Twilight Zone episode, right about when his neighbours had found a way to murder the man and his family if they didn't cooperate, the news announced that the threat had been false, and all was back to normal. The man's neighbour's tried to go back to THE WAY IT WAS, acting normal, but there was no way that family could ever look at their neighbours the same again!

That is how I feel with the horrible way Harvest Baptist Church has abused and mistreated me all these long years since 2014. Their ungodly pastors just threw me under the bus, like I wasn't a person anymore. They knew exactly where I lived, and my hurting situation, being all alone in life. One of their reprobate assistant Pastors, Jared, even mocked me, making fun of me for being alone. He said was sarcasm: “How's your belief's working out for your social life?” I went home and cried. That little man is a cold-hearted bastard with no business being in any ministry. These ungodly pastors at Harvest see no problem using two dozen different Bible versions in church. They see no harm in Calvinism, otherwise they wouldn't promote Satanic preachers like Pastor MacArthur (the modern godfather of Lordship Salvation). Thank God Jared quit and left Guam. Sadly, he's ruining lives elsewhere now! I am a good judge of character, and I know a selfish person when I meet one! Harvest is full of selfish people, especially among their pastors and staff. It's the Richy Rich club! Harvest loves their trips to Israel. I wish they'd stay there and not come back, and do the island a favor!

I have said oftentimes that I would make things up to Harvest if they ever invited me back, and simply give me a second chance; but they have ignored me, playing stupid games, and I have no patience for games, nor the ability to read their minds. All I know is that NONE of my Harvest neighbours will have anything to do with me. They just selfishly go about their lives, as if I don't exist, knowing that I have no church to attend, and they are okay with that. So what does that say about all of them at Harvest? It says they are wicked people, who parasite off of Christianity for a paycheck, and don't give a damn about THE TRUTH, nor do they give a damn about hurting people like me, who has reached out to them numerous times for their love, help and friendship. They are real bastards! If you don't like that word, then stop reading and go away. I am writing my articles the way I think God wants me to write them, from my heart!

Going back to my illustration of the man with the underground nuclear shelter, if Harvest ever did invite me back, I think it just wouldn't be the same, after they have shunned, ignored, ostracized and avoided me AS A GROUP. But I figure if they can let go of everything, so can I. It was the darndest thing last year. I mean, one week I have A GROUP of my Harvest neighbours all waving at me. I was so happy. I don't know what the hell they were doing. I waved back as earnestly as I could to let them know I AM HERE AND NOT UPSET AT YOU! I waited for an invitation to church, but one never came, so I quickly got frustrated. Next thing I know, AS A GROUP they totally reject me again—they won't even look at me, and they pretend like I am not a human being. Well fuddrucker them! That's Greek for a$$holes! I am praying about moving, possibly to Pensacola, Florida or somewhere in Texas. I am also considering taking a trip to Asia to search for a wife. I am tired of being alone. Pastor Jack Hyles is right that American women are spoiled brats who only want a man to use as a tool to get a house, money and children, but they don't want A MAN. Even worse, many young women nowadays are pursuing careers and don't won't to get married. And they talk about MGTOW (men going their own way). As far as I can tell, American women are GOING THEIR OWN WAY, and men are scared to marry them!

image

Image: A black and white photo that is labelled “Harvest Baptist Church on Guam Cult”, and has “We only care about our own; David J. Stewart is not welcome!” and “Truth-tellers are not welcome!” written below the label. The photograph consists of eight children with glowing eyes and some have the numeral “666” etched on their foreheads. The phrases that the children are saying consists of “Aren’t we supposed to love others?”, “Why am I not being friendly anymore?”, “Me too, I won’t wave either.”, “Okay, I will ignore him.”, “Isn’t this hatred?”, “Sure, be just like the pastors.”, “Can I be a big a$$hole too?” and “Nobody talk to David Stewart, we don’t like him!” Written on the children’s torsos are the phrases “My Baptist church stinks!”, “Harvest promotes Calvinism, which is Another Gospel”, “Who cares?”, “Harvest is ecumenical”, “Harvest is uncaring!”, “Harvest are selfish jerks!” and “Harvest uses dozens of fake Bible versions”

It disturbs me when I see cult behavior in a church. When my neighbours synchronize for or against me, on cue from their pastors and staff, that is a Satanic cult. Harvest Baptist Church on Guam are just as guilty as dictator Kim Jong-un in North Korea, where people are not allowed to know the truth, because everything is censored. For telling THE TRUTH that the modern Alexandrian based Bible revisions are corrupt, I have been banned and blackballed by Harvest Baptist Church since 2014. I'll never shut up! I'm not the bad guy, Kim Jong-un and Harvest Baptist Church are, for defending their errors and trying to keep people IN THE DARK! Harvest's pastors and staff have much blood on their hands!

Charlie Nash #fundie breitbart.com

Media outlets have been fooled by a joke photo long in circulation into believing that a Photoshopped picture of notorious anti-GamerGate critic Veerender Jubbal was one of the suspects responsible for the recent Paris terrorist attacks that occurred on Friday.

...

Other users have also attempted to defend Jubbal and create awareness about the hoax.
But a large majority of the internet has found the situation hilarious, especially due to the irony of Jubbal’s previous comments that have painted entire innocent communities as terrorists and hate-mongers.

...

Luckily for Jubbal, there are many women that love serial killers and the foulest dregs of society serving life sentences, so an online reputation as a suicide bomber should be more than enough to earn him the female company that so far has eluded him.

David J. Stewart #sexist #fundie jesus-is-savior.com

America was a much better nation back during the Civil War (1861-1865). Every woman wore beautiful long dresses. In the early 1900's all women dressed extremely modestly. What a great time in our nation's families. Feminism has ruined women in America. Today, it is very rare to see a woman wearing a long dress. Vintage women's clothing is so modest and classy. I encourage you ladies to wear vintage dresses. Make it your hobby. Better yet, get a sewing machine and learn as you go how to become a seamstress.

Get some vintage patterns and work at it. I've provided links on the Women's Page to numerous modest clothing places. There's a lot on the web to help you learn the art of being a seamstress. I'll tell you, if there's a need in America today it is for Christian women to inspire, encourage and teach young girls how to dress modestly with class, sew and make their own clothing. It's a great MINISTRY to start in your church ladies!

Ron Paul #fundie newsone.com

Ron Paul has made no secret the fact that he thought that the South was right in the Civil War. Here he is giving a speech in front of a giant Confederate Flag about why he believes the North was wrong in the Civil War and why the South was right.

Ron Paul is a neo-Confederate, and proud member of the Ludwig Von Mises Institute, which has been labeled as a neo-Confederate organization. In the video he claims that the North should have paid to buy slaves from southern slave owners to avoid the war, rather than the South renouncing slavery. Paul also fails to bring up the fact that it was the South that started the war by attacking the North in 1861.

Ron Paul was also was the only member of congress to vote against honoring the Civil Rights Act Of 1964 in on its 40th anniversary in 2004. Paul would also claim that he wouldn’t have voted for it at the time, putting him on the side of the racists in both the fight against slavery and the fight against Jim Crow segregation, the two defining struggles of Black people in America.

Several Ron Paul supporters have asked that the video be taken down, from the pro-Confederate channel, Patriot Review but Patriot Review believes that the video could help Paul win South Carolina.

David J. Stewart #fundie soulwinning.info

Kindly, and lovingly, I've got a big independent Baptist church down the street from me on Guam, whose shameful pastors I have repeatedly warned in a spirit of Christian love, that their “Easy-To-Read Version” is of the Devil. Instead of listening to the rebuke of a wise man (humbly), they kicked me out of THEIR church and on three later occasions have refused even allow me to attend their church services. They hate and despise me and the truth, THAT MUCH!!! I'm talking about the Bob Jones University camp, who embrace the Devil's Bible PERversions, and call me and Dr. Jack Hyles “a cult” for being King James Bible only in our beliefs and preaching!!! Isaiah 53:3, “He is despised and rejected of men; a man of sorrows, and acquainted with grief: and we hid as it were our faces from him; he was despised, and we esteemed him not.” I know how Jesus felt, being rejected and despised, and the Lord knows how I feel (Hebrews 4:15-16). I am being rejected, despised, ostracized, hated, ridiculed, and stereotyped as being in “a cult,” having been set at nought by my own Christian pastoral brethren in the local Baptist church. I've been outcast as the blacksheep of the church family... ALL BECAUSE I AM TELLING THE TRUTH!!!

The immature Baptist church on Guam, that I speak of, are indifferent toward truth. It matters not to them that Satan has flooded the churches with umpteen Bible versions. They officially use two different Bible versions: One originating from Antioch, Syria (the King James Bible); and the other text (which is corrupt) originating from Alexandrian, Egypt (the Easy-To-Read Version). The church's multiple pastors are indifferent about all this, refusing to pick a Bible and stick with it. Consequently, the church is a safe-haven for false doctrine, ranging from the evils of Lordship Salvation to the corruption of the Word of God itself. I love them, but they don't love Jesus, for if they did, then the purity of the Word of God would matter to them. Jesus is called, “THE WORD OF GOD” (Revelation 19:13). The purity of God's Word is upon my heart 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, all the time. I MUST have the very pure words of God to live by, and I have them, hallelujah!, in the precious King James Bible!!!

I can't play church! I just cannot stomach it!!! I can't take the phoniness. I have to proclaim THE TRUTH!!! Even if that harelips every dog in the county, then so be it!!! For my zeal and stand for THE TRUTH, for the Lord, I have been blackballed by the Bob Jones camp, kicked out, belittled, turned away, and left looking for another church family. It is wrong, but Jesus sees what they've done to me, and God will judge everyone at the Judgment Seat of Christ. I say that with love. What the Bob Jones University camp called me and Dr. Hyles “a cult,” so did they say those untrue words to Jesus. They banned me from their local church services, banned me from men's prayer meeting, and in so doing they BANNED JESUS CHRIST!!! They banned me because I faithfully shared THE TRUTH about God's Word, exposing the modern Bible versions as a fraud.

The Bible says that when someone hurts us, they've done it to Jesus Christ. Matthew 25:40, “And the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me.” I am not alone in my hurt, pain, frustration and suffering, Jesus feels what I feel, He is outside the Bob Jones University camp with me, enduring the mockery, rejection, being called an ”enemy” and being labeled as “a cult” member. I have MUCH to say against them all on judgment day.

RavySnake #conspiracy leekyforums.com

Was the Kalamazoo Shooting an Anti-Trump False Flag Attack?

Obama less than a week ago says he is confident Trump will not win the presidency.

On election day a alleged angry white male goes on a shooting spree. People on facebook claiming he had MAGA hats in his profile pictures.

Anyone feel this maybe a false flag to throw a wrench in Trump's campaign? Will the media try to run with it just like gamergate and Sandy Hook?

Also, it's worth noting that Obama os the King of false flags

Mike Adams #conspiracy naturalnews.com

Vaccine industry science lies are nothing more than recycled Big Tobacco science lies

You gotta love it when arrogant science devotees defiantly claim they alone have a monopoly on the "settled facts" of our reality. Throughout much of the 20th century, it turns out, these same sort of arrogant scientists claimed smoking was awesome for your health, too.

"More doctors smoke Camels than any other cigarette" was the headline of a full-page ad carried by the Journal of the American Medical Association. Doctors were paid by Big Tobacco to tout the amazing health benefits of smoking cigarettes, and any doctor who dared point out that smoking might be linked to cancer was subjected to the same industry blackballing, scientific censorship and verbal abuse that's leveled today against honest researchers questioning the safety of GMOs or mercury in vaccines.

The real truth is that science never has a monopoly on facts, and science makes enormous mistakes (such as condoning smoking cigarettes) on a regular basis. Science is also for sale and easy corrupted by corporate interests.

Mike King #conspiracy tomatobubble.com

Those of you who have had some degree of understanding about the New World Order -- that fiendishly clever conspiratorial movement to slowly bring about a super-centralized one-world dictatorship -- have no doubt experienced the frustration of trying to convince family and friends that A: You are not "crazy," and B: The trans-generational monster plot to take down America is real and not even that well-concealed any more. The torment that comes with seeing the world as it really is, while the willfully blind ridicule you, is a terrible burden that we "conspiracy theorists" ™ have always had to bear, in spite of the world's stupidity and hostility. After all, "He who dares not offend cannot be honest." (Thomas Paine).

But what if one of the 20th Century's best known and most trusted news media "rock stars" was to confirm, on camera, the validity of our nutty "conspiracy theory" ™. And what if an equally famous woman, the First Lady of the United States at the time, who came damn near close to becoming our 45th President, then congratulated that same man for his honest remarks while expressing full agreement with his totalitarian world government scheme? Would the doubters still be laughing? Try using this piece on them, and let us know what kind of reaction you get.

The logo of Cronkite's CBS depicts the same all-seeing eye as the logo for the "Novus Ordo Seclorum" (New World Order for the Ages) found on the back of a $1 dollar bill.

THE SETTING

CBS propaganda had dubbed the legendary anchorman "the most trusted man in America” and the people believed it. From those early 1962 days of TV News (when there were only three networks and no cable stations) through 1981, Cronkite's carefully cultivated marketing image as a grandfatherly sage was unquestioned. In those naive pre-Internet, pre-talk radio days, "Uncle Walter's" leftist propaganda was difficult for amateurs to detect -- but it was always there.

In 1999, Cronkite, who was by then retired, appeared at a United Nations room to accept the Norman Cousins Global Governance Award from the openly pro-world government World Federalists Association. He told those assembled, including First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton (watching by video feed), that he had always believed in world government but could not say so openly because of his position as CBS Anchorman.

Some excerpts, coupled with editorial analysis:

Cronkite: I am greatly honored to receive this award for two reasons: first, I believe as Norman Cousins did that the first priority of humankind in this era is to establish an effective system of world law that will assure peace with justice among the peoples of the world; second, I feel sentimental about this award and this organization because half a century ago Norman offered me a job as spokesman and Washington lobbyist for the World Federalist organization, which was then in its infancy.

Analysis: Norman Cousins was a Jewish-American journalist, author, professor and tireless activist for world government. The fact that Cousins offered young Walter a job with the World Federalists a "half century ago" confirms that Cronkite was always a Globalist-Socialist, if not a full blown "McCarthy-era" communist.

Cronkite: For many years, I did my best to report on the issues of the day in as objective a manner as possible to achieve. When I had my own strong opinions, as I often did, I tried not to communicate them to my audience.

Analysis: Nonsense! Cronkite's reporting was always heavily slanted leftward. It was harder to notice in those days because the viewing public had few alternatives to compare with.

Cronkite: Now, however, my circumstances are considerably different. I am in a position to speak my mind. And by God I'm gonna do it! (loud applause)

Analysis: You see, now that the retired old man has got nothing to lose, he can finally and completely drop his mask of "objectivity."

Cronkite: Those of us who are living today can influence the future of civilization. We can influence whether our planet will drift into chaos and violence, or whether through a monumental educational and political effort we will achieve a world of peace under a system of law ...

Analysis: A "monumental educational and political effort." -- Cronkite is talking about mass brainwashing, beginning in grade school, such as is now the case with the Global Warming ™ / Climate Chamnge ™ hoax to usher in world taxation.

Cronkite: ... where individual violators of that law are brought to justice.

Analysis: An "individual violator" is any foreign government that dares to defy the New World Order. The term "brought to justice" means that the "violator" is to be killed.

Cronkite: For how many thousands of years now have we humans been what we insist on calling "civilized"? And yet, in total contradiction, we also persist in the savage belief that we must occasionally, at least, settle our arguments by killing one another.

Analysis: Classic projection tactic. It is the warmongering "one worlders" who have, directly or indirectly, engineered just about every major conflict of the past two centuries! (Read: "Planet Rothschild")

1. "Peace...Peace ...Peace" -- the phony mantra of Globalists like Norman Cousins.

2. The "Planet Rothschild" two-volume set blows the cover off of this monster plot to turn humanity into a global bee-hive of raceless alienated tax and debt slaves.

Cronkite: While we spend much of our time and a great deal of our treasure in preparing for war, we see no comparable effort in establishing peace.

Analysis: Here is the "inside joke." -- In the Globalist code language, "peace" ™ is defined as the absence of resistance to the Globalists. When all nations finally and unconditionally surrender to the New World Order (a global EU), then and only then will the Globalists finally stop their endless bombings, sanctions, bribing, blackmailing, coups, assassinations, "color revolutions," wars, and proxy wars against the "violators" -- thus bringing about "world peace." See the trick?

Cronkite: It seems to many of us that if we are to avoid the eventual catastrophic world conflict we must strengthen the United Nations as a first step toward a world government with a legislature, executive and judiciary, and police to enforce its international laws and keep the peace. ... We Americans are going to have to yield up some of our sovereignty. That's going to be to many a bitter pill. It would take a lot of courage, a lot of faith and a lot of persuasion for them to come along with us on this necessity. ... But the American colonies did it once and brought forth one of the most nearly perfect unions the world has ever seen.

Analysis: Cronkite leaves no doubt. He and his ilk seek the end of America (and all nations) and the emergence of all powerful one-world-super-state to be erected behind the phony platitudinous facades of "federalism" and "democracy" ™ and "peace" ™ and "human rights" ™. And if they don't get it done "peacefully," they will have no choice but to unleash an "eventual catastrophic world conflict." (World War III)

Cronkite: Today we must develop federal structures on a global level. We need a system of enforceable world law --a democratic federal world government. ... Today the notion of unlimited national sovereignty means international anarchy. We must replace the anarchic law of force with a civilized force of law.

Translation: National sovereignty = chaos and anarchy. Nations = bad. World Government = good.

Cronkite: Ours is never going to be perfect world, nor a world without disagreement and occasional violence. But it will be a world where the majority of national leaders will consistently abide by the rule of world law, if we have our way, and those who won't will be dealt with effectively and with due process by the structures of that same world law.

Translation: Those who dare to defy our New World Order will be "dealt with" (Hussein of Iraq, Chavez of Venezuela, Qaddafi of Libya, Lil' Kim of North Korea, Assad of Syria, Putin of Russia et al.)

Cronkite: Consider... the possibility of a more representative and democratic system of decision making at the U.N. This should include both revision of the veto in the Security Council and adoption of a weighted voting system for the General Assembly. The World Federalists have endorsed Richard Hudson's Binding Triad proposal.

Analysis: By removing the veto of Security Council members (US, UK, France, China, Russia) each of the major powers will be powerless before the General Assembly's mob rule -- a mob directly controlled by the top Globalist mobsters who will have by then discarded "hit man" America like a used-up lemon.

Cronkite: George Soros, in his recent book "The Crisis of Global Capitalism," has given serious attention to this concept which would be based upon not only one-nation-one-vote but also on population and contributions to the U.N. budget.

Analysis: There it is!!! Mafia journalist Cronkite and George Soros (a "capo" of the Rothschild gang) dream of a "one-nation-one-vote" system in which hundreds of Turd World mini-gangster states get to rob the "evil rich White people" of America and Europe blind while flooding the West with their dirt-poor and criminal elements -- all done "democratically," of course. (rolling eyes sarcastically) Mind you, this was stated 20 years before the Soros-funded immigration invasion that we are witnessing today!

For nearly 40 years, the notorious billionaire George Soros has been pumping hundreds of millions of dollars in radical leftist causes, Globalist political campaigns worldwide, and world government groups. Gangsters like Soros make and promote men like Cronkite.

Cronkite: Resolutions adopted by majorities in each of these areas would be binding, enforceable law.

Analysis: "Binding, enforceable law" means that no power on earth, including the de-balled USA of the future, will ever be able to rebel against the New World Order. And that is why "liberals" are so obsessed with disarming all those millions of American "good ol' boys" who might find world government to be "a bitter pill to swallow." And you thought "gun control" was about "saving children." Ha!

Cronkite: Within the powers given to it in the Charter, the U.N. could then deal with matters of reliable financing,

Analysis: "Reliable financing" means a system of world taxation. That's what the Climate Change ™ hoax and its proposed "solution" of imposing "carbon taxes" on "wealthy nations" is really all about.

Cronkite: ... a standing U.N. peace force, development, the environment ....

Translation: Cronkite envisions a multi-ethnic global goon squad enforcing tax collection and compliance with the world system.

Cronkite: ... and human rights.

Analysis: More code language. When Globalists speak of "human right," ™, they are referring to the "rights" of their paid trouble-makers within any "violator" nation to subvert that particular government. When the target government is forced to crack down on the CIA-NGO backed agitators, saboteurs, terrorists and subversives, the Globalist media, led by the New York Slimes, will immediately accuse that nation of "human rights violations" and call for sanctions, bombing, war etc.

Cronkite: As with the American rejection of the League of Nations after World War I, our failure to live up to our obligations to the U.N. is led by a handful of willful senators who choose to pursue their narrow, selfish political objectives at the cost of our nation's conscience. They pander to and are supported by the Christian Coalition and the rest of the religious right wing.

Analysis: In order to avoid the sound logical and moral arguments against One World Government, Cronkite is setting up the straw-man of the goofy televangelist Pat Robertson.

Cronkite: Their leader, Pat Robertson, ....

Analysis: I didn't know that Pat Robertson was "our leader," -- did "youse guys" (New Jerseyese for the plural of you) know that?

Cronkite: ... has written that we should have a world government but only when the messiah arrives. "Attempts for world order before that time must be work of the Devil." -- Well, join me, I am glad to sit here at the right hand of Satan.

Analysis: Given the freaky fascination with the occult that many of these elites have been known to dabble in, Cronkite's shout-out to Satan might very well have been literal. Indeed, Cronkite was, for many years, the voice of Molech the Owl for the creepy-as-all-heck "Cremation of Care" ceremony at the secretive annual gatherings at the Bohemian Grove in Northern California. (here).

Cronkite: The only way we who believe in the vision of a democratic world federal government can effectively overcome this reactionary movement is to organize a strong educational counteroffensive stretching from the most publicly visible people in all fields to the humblest individuals in every community.

Translation: We still have got a lot of brainwashing to do before the American people will accept the New World Order as a good thing.

Now, here's the kicker. After Commie Cronkite wrapped up his open call for treason and full NWO "democratic" takeover, First Lady, future US Senator, future Secretary of State and 2016 Presidential nominee Killary Rotten Clinton appeared on the big screen to congratulate "the most trusted man in America" on his treason award.

IN HER OWN WORDS

Clinton:
"Good evening and congratulations, Walter, on receiving the World Federalist Association's Global Governance Award. For more than a generation in America, it wasn't the news until Walter Cronkite told us it was the news. Every night at 6 o'clock, we listened as you explained the complex events of the day. ... You became a trusted member of my family and the families across America. For decades, you told us "the way it is," but tonight, we honor you for fighting for the way it could be. .. So thank you, Walter. Thank you for inspiring all of us to build a more peaceful and just world. We are still listening to your every word. And with your continuing leadership, we can sail across these un-navigated seas into the 21st Century, and there is no better captain that I can imagine than you."

Cronkite and Clinton --- "the most trusted man in America" and the neurotic hag who, were it not for Donald Trump, almost became "the first woman President" -- just a couple of meaningless and non-influential "conspiracy theorists" ™, eh? Believe it, there are plenty more big names who think just like them. Actually, the entire PRC (Predatory Ruling Class) is on board with the America-busting New World Order, or at least afraid of bucking "the tide of history."

Now, as much as the pro-Globalist prostitutes of the Piranha Press, Hollyweird, Corporate America (and Europe) and Academia all love Killary and Walter (who died in 2009), that's as much as they hate Trump and Putin. So why do the "great and the good" of the bought-and-paid-for pseudo-intelligentsia all hate on Trump and Putin so much? Read the quotes below, and the world situation will begin to make more sense to you.

Trump: “We will no longer surrender this country or its people to the false song of globalism. My foreign policy will always put the interest of the American people and America security above all else. That will be the foundation of every single decision I will make.”

“America First will be the major and overriding theme of my administration,”

Putin: "What is a unipolar world? However one might embellish this term, at the end of the day it refers to one type of situation, namely one centre of authority, one centre of force, one centre of decision-making.

It is world in which there is one master, one sovereign. And at the end of the day this is pernicious not only for all those within this system, but also for the sovereign itself because it destroys itself from within....I consider that the unipolar model is not only unacceptable but also impossible in today's world. "

Putin and Trump certainly sound like "violators" who need to be "dealt with" -- eh Walter? If you still think the New World Order is just "paranoid conspiracy theory," then there is little else that can be done to enlighten you --- short of an economic calamity and/or World War III with Russia and China (which kingpin George Soros had already strongly hinted at (here)). But if you are intrigued by this subject and would like to learn more, then please have a look at "Planet Rothschild" (also linked below). Your world-view will never be the same.

HHHisXpacXSteph #racist wrestlingforum.com

In this rapidly advancing technological world mixed with an increasingly politically correct and race baiting culture we are fucked if we say anything even remotely offensive. It is now to the extent that you will be fucked over and publicly crucified if you say anything that could be remotely offensive. Jokingly call your B..Rother a "ni&&a", get into a verbal altercation on COD, call a guy a fa&&ot for saying he likes to wear eyeliner, literally anything.

Im also not just talking about like being ridiculed for being an idiot, your life will be ruined. If you make a sex tape with your wife, and afterward you say "my boss is a fucking D*ke" and that sex tape is stolen from your house...the person who stole the sex tape wont be in trouble, your life will be ruined though. You will be blackballed as a sexist and insensitive to women.

If two random guys at a party bang out a drunk girl and you go home and joke about how she was so drunk she was "dead', you will receive death threats until you need psychiatric counseling and get kicked out of college.

If you have sex with a girl, and then reject her, no matter how much proof you have that she wanted you and it wasn't rape, she will destroy your life and no one will believe you. It doesnt matter if you have texts before and after saying "I want your cock in my ass" you will be vilified and labeled a rapist.

If you are a police officer and ask a woman to get out of her car, and she curses at you, and refuses, and kicks you and you arrest her you will be labeled a racist and if that woman kills herself, regardless if there is tape showing no one entered her cell, you will be labeled a murderer.

White people and especially white men....we are fucked. Freedom even in our own houses is gone.

Mencius Moldbug #fundie unqualified-reservations.blogspot.de

(Extract from A gentle introduction to Unqualified Reservations (part 1))

First, we need to define left and right. In my opinion, obviously a controversial one, the explanation for this mysterious asymmetric dimension is easy: it is political entropy. Right represents peace, order and security; left represents war, anarchy and crime.

Because values are inherently subjective, it is possible to argue that left can be good and right can be bad. For example, you can say that the Civil War was good - the North needed to conquer the South and free the slaves.

On the other hand, it is also quite easy to construct a very clean value system in which order is simply good, and chaos is simply evil. I have chosen this path. It leaves quite a capacious cavity in the back of my skull, and allows me to call myself a reactionary. To you, perhaps, it is the dark side. But this is only because the treatment is not yet complete.

Whatever you make of the left-right axis, you have to admit that there exists some force which has been pulling the Anglo-American political system leftward for at least the last three centuries. Whatever this unfathomable stellar emanation may be, it has gotten us from the Stuarts to Barack Obama. Personally, I would like a refund. But that's just me.

It is time to understand this force. My theory is that what we're looking at is the attraction of power itself. The left attracts a natural coalition because it always attracts those whose only interest is in the pure thrill of domination. Most will join them through peer pressure alone, leaving only the misfits.

Let's look, for a minute, at the minds of the people who hold these positions of power. Your R1 professors, your Times reporters, and so on. These are, of course, very competitive jobs, and only a tiny minority of the people who want them and are capable of doing them will get to have them. They have certainly worked very hard to get where they are. And they perceive that effort as one made in the interest of humanity at large.

I think the salaries at this level are reasonable, but it is not money that makes people want these jobs. It is power, which brings with it status. I define power as personal influence over important events; I don't know of any other definition.

One of the key reasons that intellectuals are fascinated by disorder, in my opinion, is the fact that disorder is an extreme case of complexity. And as you make the structure of authority in an organization more complex, more informal, or both - as you fragment it, eliminating hierarchical execution structures under which one individual decides and is responsible for the result, and replacing them with highly fragmented, highly consensual, and highly process-oriented structures in which ten, twenty or a hundred people can truthfully claim to have contributed to the outcome, you increase the amount of power, status, patronage, and employment produced.

Of course, you also make the organization less efficient and effective, and you make working in it a lot less fun for everyone - you have gone from startup to Dilbert. This is Brezhnevian sclerosis, the fatal disease of organizations in a highly regulated environment. All work is guided by some systematic process, in which each rule was contributed by someone whose importance was a function of how many rules he added. In the future, we will all work for the government. Individually, this is the last thing your average intellectual wants to do, but it is the direction in which his collective acts are pushing us.

In short: intellectuals cluster to the left, generally adopting as a social norm the principle of pas d'ennemis a gauche, pas d'amis a droit, because like everyone else they are drawn to power. The left is chaos and anarchy, and the more anarchy you have, the more power there is to go around. The more orderly a system is, the fewer people get to issue orders. The same asymmetry is why corporations and the military, whose system of hierarchical executive authority is inherently orderly, cluster to the right.

Once the cluster exists, however, it works by any means necessary. The reverence of anarchy is a mindset in which an essentially Machiavellian, tribal model of power flourishes. To the bishops of the Cathedral, anything that strengthens their influence is a good thing, and vice versa. The analysis is completely reflexive, far below the conscious level. Consider this comparison of the coverage between the regime of Pinochet and that of Castro. Despite atrocities that are comparable at most - not to mention a much better record in providing responsible and effective government - Pinochet receives the full-out two-minute hate, whereas the treatment of Castro tends to have, at most, a gentle and wistful disapproval.

This is because Pinochet's regime was something completely alien to the American intellectual, whereas - the relationship between Puritan divines and Bolshevism being exactly as the mad Arab, Abdul Alhazred, says - Castro's regime was something much more understandable. If you sketch the relative weights of the social networks connecting Pinochet to the Cathedral, versus Castro to the Cathedral, you are comparing a thread to a bicep.

various commenters #fundie breitbart.com

(Marilyn & James Dean)
From High Above The Beautiful, Milky Way,
In 1861, a few months before the start of the Civil War, there were 4,000,000 slaves in the United States.
Not one of these slaves was owned by a Republican. They were ALL owned by Democrats.
A few years of the most horrible war in American history, and the Republican President who put an end to this horrible evil, was murdered by a pro slavery, actor, John Wilkes Booth.
Fast forward, 153 years later to the cycle of evil, that pervades this country.
Democrats openly advocate, promote, and participate in the daily and ongoing, mass murder of innocent, unborn, children.
Nothing in the history of all humanity, was, is, or ever will be, worse than that.
It is the absolute epitome of pure, evil.

(anjisan)
And over 1/2 of those slaves were owned by black slave owners.!!

(Slick312)
Indentured servants, which was another form of slavery, vastly outnumbered slave.

(Vlad-the-emailer)
Thank you for bringing this up, in many cases they were treated far worse than slaves because of the low investment their holders had.

(anjisan)
Slavery was illegal until e slave owner positioned to have it made legal he wanted to keep his slave the rest of his life. that slave owner was a black man.!!

Harmonica #wingnut identitydixie.com

[From "Notes on the Third Reconstruction"]

Previously, I took the view that there were three periods of Reconstruction on the South. The First Reconstruction began in 1865 at Appomattox and ended in 1877 with the withdrawal of the last Reconstruction soldiers from Dixie. The Second Reconstruction began in 1954 with Brown v Board of Education and ended in 1972 when George Wallace forced Richard Nixon to embrace an anti-busing position, something I previously outlined here. The Third Reconstruction began in 2015 with the Charleston Church shooting and is going on to this day, having picked up considerable steam in the past few months. However, the more I study, the more I am convinced that there are actually four Reconstruction periods. The first two Reconstructions remain unchanged, but I now realize that there was a Third Reconstruction during the 1990s, beginning in 1991 and ending in 2001. What I previously considered the Third Reconstruction is actually the Fourth Reconstruction (our present situation).

The true Third Reconstruction began in 1991, one of the most important years in human history. It is this year that the Soviet Union fell and Marxists had to abandon their economic focus and shift fully to the Culture War – embracing anti-racism (anti-Western civilization), feminism (anti-masculinity) and the alphabet soup identities (anti-procreation). It was also that year that, with the fall of the Soviet Union, globalism was left unchallenged . In the U.S., 1991 would also see the emergence of the Clinton takeover of the Democratic Party, completing the transformation of what was the pro-worker, pro-Dixie, virtually Christian Democratic Party of my grandfather to a party that was willing to sell out workers for free trade and celebrate infanticide. And, more directly related to Dixie, it was this same year the NAACP issued a proclamation condemning the use of the Confederate flag.

Part of the reason I didn’t think the 1990s constituted the Third Reconstruction was how idyllic that time period appeared to be when I was growing up. It was a world where the Old South still lived, Confederate flags were commonplace, and we still had men like M.E. Bradford with us. “Unreconstructed” was a compliment in those days. But, as I have studied the era with clearer eyes, I realize things were not as rosy as they appeared to be. It was a decade of several significant terrorist attacks, a ton of racial tension, and horrific school shootings just to name a few. It was also a time when the Republican Party began to win elections, outside the presidency, with some consistency in Dixie. While a surface level critique would suggest that this was simply the result of the national Democratic Party moving leftward and that Dixie just replaced conservative Democrats with conservative Republicans, the truth is much more complicated as there was a distinct difference between the conservative Democrats of Dixie’s past and the conservative Republicans of the 1990s onward. The former was a conservatism of a particular people and their preservation, the latter was a conservatism of corporate profits and military spending.

It was during the 1990s that these newly elected Republicans began to dole out the incentives to come to Dixie, under the auspices of “creating jobs” and being “pro-business.” It worked for a while, but with this job growth came new people that did not share our values. Until the 1980s, virtually the entire native population of Dixie could claim membership in the Sons of Confederate Veterans or the United Daughters of the Confederacy, now we’re being pushed out by newcomers to such a point that we joke if Atlanta is even still in the South, and how in Florida the farther south you go, the further “north” you get.

[...]

Now I see that what occurred in the 1990s helped create the political climate of today and what victories we did gain was merely an illusion. We lost because we allowed the subtle subversion of our culture to take place, the fruits of which are being felt today. I liken what happened during the 1990s to AIDS. When the body is first infected with the HIV virus, the person will have flu like symptoms for two weeks before they recover. That’s when the virus is working its way into the body. Years later, the problems really start as the immune system has been ravished. And, such is the case with Dixie (along with the rest of America). The battles we were fighting were small potatoes compared to what had gone on before, but it was even more destructive in many ways as it destroyed the long-term ability for Dixie to push back.

When future historians write about how efficient the Fourth Reconstruction was, I think the events of the 1990s will be seen as particularly important. Yes, I know the history of the Fourth Reconstruction has yet to be completed, but it isn’t looking good and that they were able to push things this far is remarkable and frankly frightening. It would have been unthinkable at any point in the past and it didn’t come out of the blue, it was simply the 1990s baring fruit. It was the era when we were promised that in exchange for assimilation, we could become wealthy. Far too many of our people took it, especially the politically well-connected. Due to the problems of that decade, Dixie was unable to produce a new generation of leadership to guide her during tough times, and boy are these ever tough times. The 1990s may have looked great at the time, but good times don’t forge strong men – were living through that now. The good news is that tough times do forge strong men.

Keep the faith. We’re not dead yet.

Anonymous Coward #fundie godlikeproductions.com

Feminism is being used by the NWO/CIA/Pentagon/etc. as a military psychological weapon to control society

feminism as a military psychological weapon to control society

[link to famguardian.org]


feminism as a military psychological weapon to control society


Message To All so-called Patriot Americans: You Can't Handle The Truth

1. Current US child support laws were actually invented in the former communist Soviet Union.

2. Current child support laws are communist infiltrations into the united states of America.

feminism as a military psychological weapon to control society

Amerika the 4th Reich:

FEMINISM IS SOCIALISM

First thing communist countries do is put the women to work to take over the family unit. Increasing the workforce decreases wages - Economy101 - basic simple concepts of supply and demand. Women in the workforce doubled the workforce which decreased wages - (which was deceptively hidden thru deflation/the devaluing of the dollar).

(example: Let's say I own a factory. I have 500 employees knocking on my door everyday looking for work; I can then decrease wages and say, "If you don't like it there's the door. I have 500 ppl knocking on my door everyday looking for work." On the other hand, if I cannot find enough ppl to work in my factory, I would have to increase wages (if I can still make a profit.)
Read again from top now and Continue)...

That is why in the 1950's, the avg. American family lived fine on one income but today the avg. American family needs two incomes just to get by. Women in the workforce; feminism, just created more Taxpaying Slaves for The State resulting in the enslavement of the average American family unit.

Feminists are being used ... they have complained about power control freak men, husbands ... only to have it replaced by a Power-Control-Freak Totalitarian Police STATE. Create a (so-called) problem just to justify the excuse for more power to solve it is the oldest Dictator ploy in the book.

Either Fathers own their children or the STATE OWNS the children. Law of the Jungle; women look for the best Provider -- when the best Provider becomes the STATE (i.e. the Welfare State), she then marries (into) the STATE and now the STATE OWNS her children.

"Who owns the youth owns the future!" - Adolf Hitler ... thus the US Dept. of (in)Human(e) Services; Division of Family Destruction. Either the man/husband/father is the Head of His Household ... or the STATE is the HEAD of your Household! Attack the Family Unit = weaken society ... thus more STATE CONTROL. Cut the Head (man of the household) out - thus more STATE CONTROL = own the children thus more STATE CONTROL - breed ignorant society thus more STATE CONTROL.

Feminism = weaker men; weaker men = LESS RESISTANCE thus more STATE CONTROL.
Patriarchy = Men own their wives ... it's called a family unit ... it's called morality.

Feminism/matriarchy = everyone having sex with each others' women while still remaining "friends" like a bunch of ANIMALS! Feminism/matriarchy = village = socialism = tribalism = lowest form of civilization = NO SURPLUS = Deficit = Slavery.

Patriarchy = family unit = efficiency = prosperity = Individual Rights = opposite of socialism = Surplus = free time for great works/inventions ... i.e. immigrants who come here and prosper come from patriarchal family structures because Patriarchy = family unit = efficiency.

Name me one time when Government Sponsored Propaganda was not Totalitarian in Nature. Feminism is Government Sponsored Propaganda - to weaken society; weaken the family unit; weaken it's men ... for more STATE CONTROL.

Multiculturalism = everyone different (immigrants not "Americanized") = NO UNITY amongst society = Divide & Conquer/LESS RESISTANCE thus more STATE CONTROL.
Homosexuality + abortion = population control.

Population control techniques deployed at Americans + allowing more illegal immigrants into the country = higher % (of society) of a working slave force - cheap labor.

Racial Eugenics in AmeriKa:
The #1 Group to benefit from Affirmative Action are white women (thus) they are using mathematics to keep a large percentage of minority men DOWN
"He who rules mathematics rules the Universe"
This is the mathematics of racial eugenics.
This is the mathematics of the New World Order.

AmeriKa Today has 1/3 of the entire world's prison population and 78% of Amerikan prisoners are black men, and that is not even counting latino men.
If these black men were all let out of jail, there would not be enough jobs for them all.

The Shadow Government who is truly in Control of AmeriKa, wants and needs all these minority males in jail so that they can give half the good jobs to white women.

I am going to expose this evil to Non-White AmerIka. I am not against white people, I am against the evils of feminism, I am against having all these minority males living horrific lives in jail at the expense of the AmeriKan Feminist WHITE WOMAN.

Even after DNA proves that he is NOT the biological Father, Judges in the US still force thousands of men to pay child support even with the DNA evidence in front of them !!!

Thousands of men in California ALONE are being forced to pay child support AFTER DNA Proves that He is NOT the Biological father:
[link to www.abcnews.go.com]
News/paternity021002.html
www.glennjsacks.com/california_governor_davis.htm

Not even Saddam Hussein would force a man to pay child support for a child that is NOT his !!!
Feminism is a Weapon of Mass Destruction

"First You Get the Women, Then You've Got the Children, So Follow the Men" -Adolph Hitler

"The `perennial' father is a menace to society and must be treated as such. Like the mental defectives and those afflicted with certain hereditary diseases, he should, after due warning, be rendered incapable of further parentage." -W.J. Ruth. "Population Control For Unemployment." Birth Control Review, Volume XVII, Number 5 (May 1933), page 134.

In the Book of Genesis, when Satan attacked Adam and Eve, he attacked through the weaker vessel: the woman. Just like The STATE is doing today, attacking us through feminism, through the 'woman'. Falsely "empower" the woman for her to make the wrong choices that way to weaken the man to control him. This is how evil attacks man, who was made in the image of God.

In the Book of Exodus, Pharaoh of Egypt decided to kill all the male Israelite infants to weaken the Israelites militarily. This is nothing new. Think about it ! ! !

Statism is Antichrist plain and simple. God should be the King and Head of an individual man, and the man/husband should be the head of his household, not the Anti-Christ STATE.

In this last century alone, governments around the world have killed over 500 million people of their own people. All this government sponsored propaganda about Domestic Violence is just a smoke screen to divert attention from the real abuse: Government Abuse Against It's Own People. This is the real Domestic Violence.

The Bible depicted governments as Beasts; in Daniel and Revelations. Look at old Nazi film; their Armies marching like ants mimicking the Animal Kingdom and therefore subhuman. Individual Freemen become just another cog in the Wheel of the Predator Beast State which becomes the Alpha Male which today IT is doing this through the propaganda of feminism. By feminizing society and thus emasculating it's males for more State Control.

"To disobey tyranny is to obey God." - Thomas Jefferson


Paying child support kills children by Funding/Subsidizing the #1 KILLER of children: single-mother-households:
Children from single-mother households, compared to children of two-parent families where the biological father is present, are more likely to go to prison by 20 times, to commit suicide by 5 times, to have behavioral problems by 20 times, to become rapists by 14 times, to run away by 32 times, to abuse chemical substances by 10 times, to drop out of high school by 9 times, to be seriously abused by 33 times, to be fatally abused by 73 times, to be one tenth as likely to get A's in school, and to [per Lenore Weitzman] have a 72% lower standard of living.

"This country, with its institutions, belongs to the people who inhabit it. Whenever they shall grow weary of the existing government, they can exercise their constitutional right of amending it, or their revolutionary right to dismember it or overthrow it." - Abraham Lincoln, First Inaugural Address, March 4, 1861 (1809-1865)

Question to America:

America used to be free. Not anymore. America has turned into Amerika.

Question to America:
1. I steal your car.
2. You take me to Court and the Judge 'gives' me custody of your car.
3. On top of that, the Judge now says you must keep paying the monthly payments, insurance, and overall maintenance of the car.
If you refuse to 'pay', you are labeled/vilified into a lowlife scumbag dirt bag criminal and thrown in jail surrounded by violent criminals.
And to make matters even worse, the government pays/sponsors for a massive government Nazi-like propaganda campaign, brainwashing society, convincing them that if you don't accept/pay for this, with a smile on your face no doubt, that you are than a scumbag dirt bag lowlife 'deadbeat' who belongs in jail surrounded by murderers, rapists, child molesters, etc.

Question to America:
What exactly happened here?
Explain to me what happened here, because this is exactly what they are doing to American Fathers.

If the British had this current System some 200 yrs. ago the American Revolution would have never happened. Benjamin Franklin had like 13 bastard children, he would have ended up in jail as a 'deadbeat' dad.
The rest of our Founding Fathers would have been forced to 'attend' Anger Management Courses.

This US Media Propaganda Machine would have called the Protestors of the Boston Tea Party a bunch of 'nuts' and/or anarchists.

Feminism is a military psychological weapon to feminize/emasculate society for more State Control by weakening the State's Main Competitor: Men

The US Federal Government is the Biggest Deadbeat: $5.7 TRILLION on the National Debt - (financial-future of 'our children').

The STATE Kidnaps children from their Fathers than demand ransom/extortion deceptively called 'child support.'

Maxim of law: The children that belong to the mother are those of slaves and animals. But the children that belong to the Father are those of Freemen.

That is why the Slave Masters used to separate the black slave Father from the black slave mother and child to weaken them to better control them. Divide & Conquer: this is nothing new.
And now they are doing it to men today in Amerika: 2008

Even after DNA proves that he is NOT the biological Father, thousands of men in America are still FORCED to pay this ransom/extortion deceptively called child support even with DNA EVIDENCE PROVING he is NOT the Father:
[link to www.abcnews.go.com]

Why aren't former Enron Execs forced to pay child support to all the familes who lost their money?
Why should Corporations have more rights then Individuals?
The Constitution spoke of Rights of the Individual (not of the rights of Corporations)

Also:
Women today can dump their babies off in garbage dumpsters and go to jail, but when they get out of jail (they are than not forced to pay child support)

Women today can dump their babies off in Police Stations and Hospitals and not be prosecuted for it (a new law now) And these women are not forced to pay child support...

Women can also give up their baby to adoption (orphanages)... and not be forced to pay child support. Women can dump THEIR responsibilities...

Why can't men ?

Society today promotes, advocates, and supports homosexuality while at the same time promote, advocate, and fully support destroying heterosexual males with alimony and child support... this is SATANIC !!!

"Those who profess to favor freedom, and yet depreciate agitation, are men who want crops without plowing up the ground. They want rain without thunder and lightning. They want the ocean without the awful roar of its waters. This struggle may be a moral one; or it may be a physical one; or it may be both moral and physical; but it must be a struggle! Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did, and it never will. Find out just what people will submit to, and you have found out the exact amount of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them; and these will continue until they are resisted with either words or blows, or with both. The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress." - Thomas Paine


All Praise and Glory to the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob

the Only True God - The Creator of both the Heavens and the Earth in the NAME OF JESUS THE CHRIST

313Chris #racist occidentaldissent.com

Hunter, people should be careful when they talk about dissolving the Union, Southerners in particular.

If the Union were to be dissolved, then we assume it could only be under circumstances where there is no longer any kind of central authority holding it togethor by force — no Washington DC, no federal troops, just disparate regions and the racial majorites that control them.

So it essentially boils down to numbers. Politics goes out the window, and numerical racial majority becomes the rule of the land. There are more white people in the North than in the South. There are more niggers and beaners in the South than inn the North. Where do think people are going to go, if it came to that, given those demographic realities?

You might then say ‘The Yankees in the North will welcome all niggers from South and take care of them because it’s the historical Yankee way’ or some such. Well, that’s just way off. This isn’t 1861 anymore. Racial attitudes today are demonstrably harder among Northern whites than they are among Southern whites. Without the federal government in place to strong-arm us into tolerating the presence of niggers, like has been the case in Detroit since 1838, there would be nothing stopping us from expelling them from our territory — certainly not some antiquated notions about “Yankee utopianism” that no one today would have any clue about anyway.

And the above would hold true in every city and state in the North, even the ones in New England.

So what do you think the niggers are going to do? Stay in the cold states where they’ve been utterly cut-off, chased out, and hunted down? No, they are going to migrate South, where it’s warm & hospitable, where they can steal chickens and catch catfish or whatever they do, and most of all, where they are the numerical majority in many areas.

The beaners, gooks, and assorted mystery-meats would go back where they came from in short order. They have no claim here, and wouldn’t risk their necks over one.

If anything resembling civilization emerges from a dissolution of the Union, it’s going to be where white people are the numerical majority, and where white people are the most conservative. This rules out Dixie, and the Pacific Northwest.

Personally, I don’t want to divide up this country and trade populations like baskets of fruit at a farmers market. I want white people in every region of America to take responsibility for their own homeland when the time comes.

Tony Demarcus, Ph.D., D.D. #fundie disqus.com

Breiter:

Baring the fact that your inane posting has nothing to do with the topic at hand, the fake Westboro (Hellsboro) Lieberal Baptist Church has been rebuked by a number of Christian Preachers. Take for example the illustrious James Lyman, a.k.a. James the Preacher, who made them look the fools that they are on numerous occasions. How did he do that? Simple: he used the Christian Bible to expose and rebuke their iniquities! Simple isn't it?

The Christian also must inform you, that relative to the message posited by the boy in the picture, there is nothing wrong with it whatsoever. Does our Jesus hate all who are not real Bible-believing Christians, a.k.a. all satanists? Of course He does! Ps. 5:5 illustrates this point without any reservation! To wit: "The foolish shall not stand in thy sight: thou hatest all workers of iniquity." Got it?

As the Christian studies the Christian Bible, we also know the pagan entities that make up these "foolish" and other "workers of iniquity". Romans 1, and many others others, state it so plainly even most pagans get it! The complete list of the various heathen entities would be way too long to post here, but you can get a glimpse into the subject matter by perusing the blog of our national treasure, the esteemed Pastor Jerry Dixon: https://pastorjerrydixon.wo...

See yourself in there? If so, there is good news for you: even someone like you can get Saved and be Loved! All you have to do is to repent of your sins and to genuinely and truly accept our beloved Jesus as your Lord and Savior. Simple stuff!

You can thank the Christian later for showing you true Christian Love relative to offering you the good news of the Gospel.

Brother T

antitox #fundie rr-bb.com

[In a response to a thread 'There is no devil and there are no demons']

Indeed. These folks get a pardon every time they're wrong. Jeanne Dixon got the same favorable treatment. But if a peacher makes a mistake, WHOA, the media is on top of it with a microscope and it's on the 6 o clock news.

So they use psychics to find dead bodies. Of course, the demons KNOW where the dead bodies are. After all, they were there when it happened and probably were the main instigator fueling the act.

Sheeesh.

Doug Wilson & Steve Wilkins #fundie reformed-theology.org

Slavery was attended with evils. As it existed in the South, it was not in any way perfect or utopian. But too often the real problems with slavery were not the problems we have been told about. However, as discussed earlier, Christians should be quick to notice the discrepancies between biblical slavery and that practiced in the South. These differences between the biblical standard and Southern slavery do make impossible an unqualified defense of the institution as it existed and operated in the South. Furthermore, the cruel mistreatment given to some slaves is inexcusable and truly despicable. All such evil was wicked and indefensible. When modern Christians condemn such things, however, they must recognize that they are not condemning something defended by the South. This mistreatment was reprobated by the majority of ante bellum Southerners as well. Modern condemnations of these abuses are several centuries late.

Third, a problem with slavery not yet discussed is the fact that slavery promoted what can be called a "slave mentality" in the minds of some blacks. Not everyone, as we have seen, was so affected. There are amazing stories regarding the industry and ingenuity of many slaves. Not everyone imbibed the "slave mentality," but many did. There are many complaints in the Slave Narratives which indicate this. The majority of those interviewed complain that they would rather be slaves again than to be free with all the responsibilities that freedom entails. Ironically, if slavery had not been so pleasant an experience for the majority, this mentality would not likely have such a strong hold upon the minds of some of their descendants today.

Finally, slavery gave an issue to radical revolutionaries by which they could provoke animosity against the South and, consequently, the "old order" which held sway in this nation prior to 1861. The War that resulted gave these radicals opportunity to increase the size and power of the federal Government in this nation to undreamed-of proportions. Our nation, after 1865, was transformed into a distinctly different entity than it had been before. The nation established by the founding fathers, a limited, constitutional republic, a union of free States, was no more. And the modern, messianic State which seeks to bring salvation by law, was firmly established.

Roy Dixon #fundie signonsandiego.com

Proposition 8 is not discrimination. It is a way to keep marriage holy and sacred the way God intended. Have you seen a “gay” restroom? A “gay” water fountain? A “gay” waiting room? Have you even heard of a “gay” person being lynched in the news recently? No, because those things that I named are true issues of discrimination.

Homosexuality is not a race, gender, religion issue. It's about choice and behavior. Everyone has encountered discrimination, because of the way they are shaped, the way they talk or even the color of their skin. Homosexuals were not born that way. They choose to like the same sex.

God has a plan for all of us, and we should not hinder or look away from that plan. He wants the best for us. Proposition 8 is God's will. He is the father, and every father has rules. Fathers make rules because they love their children. And children should obey the rules their fathers have given them.

JohnWickCel #crackpot #sexist #wingnut incels.co

2014 seems to be when everything went to crap both socially and media wise.

2014 was the year of GamerGate, which seems to be the first big SJW outing and when SJW's started to really infect everything. 2016 was when the dam broke with the USA election happened and stuff like MeToo became a thing.It also really let women go crazy with their sluttiness and their treatment of men. And based off what I've heard from other guys, it also ended a lot of trust and comfortableness men had around women. And yes I know things could get crappy in regards to this stuff before, but this seems to be when it started it's insane descent into where we are now.

JD Greear #fundie charismanews.com

Pastor: Preaching Against Homosexuality Akin to Preaching Against Slavery

Baptist pastor said at the denominations summit earlier this week.

The setting was the Southern Baptist Convention’s Ethics and Religious Liberty summit. The topic: preaching about homosexuality in the gay rights era.

Summit Church’s Pastor J.D. Greear certainly got the audience's attention when he started making comparisons between preaching against homosexuality in modern days to preaching against slavery in the 1800s.

With the hashtag #erlcsummit, RNS’s Sarah Pulliam Bailey quoted Greear on Twitter as saying, “Preaching against homosexuality is about as popular as preaching against slavery in South Carolina in the 1800s.”

Another tweeter, Ruth Graham (@publicroad) wrote, “@jdegreear compares preaching against homosexuality today to preaching against slavery in South Carolina in 1861."

So who is this brave pastor? Greear became the pastor of a church called Homestead Heights Baptist Church in 2002. According to his bio, he led a 40-year-old, plateaued church of 300 to re-launch itself with a new name and a new vision to reach its community and world with the gospel. Now, over 8,000 worshippers gather weekly, making The Summit Church one of Outreach magazine’s “top 25 fastest-growing churches in America” for several years running.

Jim #fundie blog.jim.com

A hundred years ago the Czar and his family were murdered, which murder foreshadowed and led to the murder of huge numbers of ordinary people.

Progressives, including supposedly very moderate centrist progressives, made, and continue to make all sorts of myths justifying and rationalizing the murder, revealing their intent to do it all over again.

Myth: The Czar was brutal and oppressive, but the soldiers refused to fire on the revolting masses, so he was overthrown, and thus the communists, representing the masses to power.

Reality: The Czar was a cucked progressive. He had Lenin and Stalin his hands, guilty of all sorts of crimes that gave him grounds for execution or indefinite imprisonment, but let them off because letists are holier than thou. There were no revolting masses, just a series of coups made in the name of the revolting masses, and such riots and looting as occurred, occurred Ferguson style – the police were ordered to stand back and let the mobs loot stuff and smash stuff.

The February revolution was no revolution – rather the elite allowed the mobs to knock over a few breweries, to provide an excuse for them seizing power from the Czar while he was away at the front.

The communists did not overthrow the Czar. The Kadets overthrew the Czar. Then Kerensky overthrew the Kadets with a policy of no enemies to the left, no friends to the right, which meant he disarmed the military officers, and armed the communists. Then the communists overthrew Kerensky. The leftism of the Czar led to his overthrow by the even lefter Kadets, the indecisive leftism of the Kadets led to their overthrow by Kerensky, and the radical leftism of Kerensky led to his overthrow by the even lefter communists, who then murdered the Czar, and millions of peasants, until the madness ended with them murdering each other.

What happened to Russia was leftism leading to more leftism.

Progressives agree that serfdom was absolutely horrid, and perhaps it was. If it was horrid, the solution should have been to free the serfs and leave the land with the lords. Or perhaps give some of the land to the more competent, successful, and wealthy serfs. But this solution was considered unthinkably horrible and inconceivably reactionary, which implicitly acknowledged that most serfs were not ready to run their own lives. What progressives wanted was the serfs freed with the land. But quite obviously, most serfs were incompetent to operate a small farm. So progressives wanted them to operate the land collectively. But if one man trying to run a small farm is hard, one hundred men trying to run a large farm is considerably harder.

So, Alexander the liberator freed them with collective ownership of the land. Which was predictably a disaster. And there was thereafter a succession of ever lefter government measures to try to deal with the problem, each of which made the problem worse. Russian agriculture still has not recovered. By freeing the serfs and giving them the land collectively, but not individually, Alexander the liberator set in motion a slide ever leftwards that continued steadily all the way to the liquidation of the kulaks.

The liberation of the serfs with collective ownership of the land created a crisis, for which the solution was always more leftism, which led to more crisis. This created an expectation that the way to power was to be lefter than thou. The Czar’s generals and bureaucrats outflanked him on the left. Kerensky’s socialists outflanked them on the left, and the Communists outflanked Kerensky on the left. Then the communists proceeded to outflank each other, till Stalin put a stop to that.

If at any time any of Alexander the Liberator’s successors had been so horribly repressive as to demonstrate that lefter than thou was a seriously bad career move, as Stalin belatedly demonstrated, the slide leftwards would have halted and stayed halted. But instead the Czars allowed to the progressives to guilt them into doing whatever the progs demanded, which merely excited progressive bloodlust.

Patrick Scrivener #conspiracy reformation.org

The "space age" was launched to undermine the foundation of the earth!!

Even though children were exposed to the ball earth when they first entered kindergarten, it wasn't until the dawn of the "space age" that thinking people were forced to accept it as a "scientific" fact.

The fact that the earth is stationary and flat is the very foundation of Christianity:

Of old you laid the foundation of the earth, and the heavens are the work of your hands (Psalm 102:25).

Satan knows that he must undermine the foundation in order to enthrone is mother goddess.

Jesuit "Sir" Isaac Newton invented GRAVITY to explain why the oceans, and all living things, stick to a rotating ball earth.

Newton was a bitter foe of the Fifth Monarchy Men, and he spent most of his life studying the Book of Daniel and Revelation in order to refute them.

Gravity did away with antipodes or men walking upside down in the Southern hemisphere.

According to Jerome's corrupt Latin Vulgate Version, the earth is suspended in space by NOTHING:

He stretched out the north over the empty space (Lat. super vacuum) and hangeth the earth upon nothing (Lat . super nihili). (Job 26:7, Douay-Rheims Version).

That is an apt description of the earth according to Newton: A ball hanging in SPACE suspended by NOTHING or GRAVITY.

Newton's "law of universal gravitation" states that "a particle attracts every other particle in the universe using a force that is directly proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them."

In other words, the further an object is from another, the less the gravitational attraction.

To prove this bizarre theory, astronots aboard a fake ISS are shown in "zero gravity."

Remove gravity from the fake Newtonian system and the foundation is as unstable as water. That has not prevented NASA from spending billions of taxpayer dollars to prop up their crumbling foundatiuon. To go to so much trouble to exalt a female pagan deity is beyond belief.

[...]

Hillary in the White House is a vital part of the "Virgin Mary" Co-Redemptrix dogma!!

Hillary in the White House is a vital cog in the Rockefeller/Vatican scheme to force acceptance of that dogma worldwide:

For all nations (UN) have drunk of the wine of the wrath of her fornication, the kings of the earth have committed fornication with her, and the merchants of the earth have become rich through the abundance of her luxury (Revelation 18:3).

On 9/11, the official Hillary double was introduced. Hillary can run the White House vicariously through her double like she ruled the nation during the Presidency of her husband.

The official Hillary double was introduced on 9/11.

That date was so appropriate because Jay and Hillary Rockefeller engineered the 9/11 false flag operation.

If Hillary is placed in the White House, both Russia and the United States will have doppelganger Presidents.

For the past 500 years, with very few exceptions, female rulers have been bitter persecutors of Christianity. The first female ruler to be crowned Queen of England was the daughter of King Henry VIII and Catherine of Aragon. Catherine was the niece of King Charles I of Spain.

Bloody Mary Tudor earned that sobriquet because she had over 300 British Christians burned alive at the stake.

A bigoted devotee of Minerva, she was also married to King Philip II of Spain.

Mary of Hungary (sister of King Charles I of Spain) introduced the Inquisition into Holland and she outdid Bloody Mary in persecuting zeal.

Mary was married to King Louis II of Hungary. When the Terrible Turks were on their way to conquer Germany in 1529, Louis put up token resistance and was killed in battle.

Mary became ruler of the Hapsburg Netherlands in 1531. She ruled that province with an iron fist until 1555. Thousands of Christians perished during her reign as she turned Holland into a veritable slaughterhouse.

Queen Elizabeth I (Shake-speare) succeeded Bloody Mary Tudor and ended the overt persecution of Christianity.

During her reign, the corrupt Latin Vulgate was translated into English.

Elizabeth coordinated the horrible Saint Bartholomew's Day Massacre with Catherine de' Medici in France.

Elizabeth also made sure that no British colony was established in the New World during her reign. Both women were under the control of the Jesuit generals in Rome.

Queen Victoria was the daughter of Sir John Conroy and Victoire of Saxe-Coburg-Saalfeld.

Known as the "Grandmother of Europe," her grandsons included WWI Kaiser Bill, Winston Churchill, and Adolf Hitler.

Contemporaneous with Queen Victoria, China was ruled by another femme fatale named Empress Tzu-hsi.

Empress Tzu-hsi was the de facto ruler of China from 1861 until her death in 1908. The Empress presided over the Chinese St. Bartholomew's Day Massacre of Christians. In the West, the Massacre was called the Boxer Rebellion.

CH #fundie heartiste.wordpress.com

amazon_policy

Amazon applauds @KevinYoder on the passage of his amendment to the @DHSgov appropriations bill, H.R. 392, that would remove the per-country limit on green cards. This is an important step towards green card reform, and Amazonians thank you for your leadership on this issue.

There is no European Christendom. There is only one genderfluid system of systems, one vast and immane, interwoven, interacting, multivariate, multinational dominion of dildos. Petro-dollars, electro-dollars, multi-dollars, bitcoin, dickcoin, clitcoin, and shekels. It is the international system of cashless transaction which determines the totality of life on this planet. That is the natural order of things today. That is the atomic and subatomic and galactic structure of things today! And YOU — pro-America dissident — have meddled with the primal forces of nature, and YOU… WILL… ATONE! Am I getting through to you, Mr. Trump? You get up on your little hundred-and-twenty-one inch screen and howl about America First. There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only Facecock, and Twatter, and Amazonia, and Clitflix, HBOrifice, Goolag, and Gamergate. Those are the nations of the world today. What do you think the Russians talk about in their councils of state, Karl Marx? They get out their linear programming charts, statistical decision theories, minimax solutions, and compute the price-cost probabilities of their two bit phishing scams and Facecock ad investments, just like we do. We no longer live in a world of nations and ideologies, Mr. Trump. The world is a college of corporations, inexorably determined by the immutable bylaws of gaysex. The world is a business, Mr. Trump. It has been since man crawled out of the slime. And our genitally malformed anti-social autistic children will live, Mr. Trump, to see that… perfect world… in which there’s no war or famine, oppression or brutality. One vast and ecumenical holding company, for whom all men will work to serve a common profit, in which all men will hold a share of clit ticklers. All hormone replacements provided, all anxieties tranquilized, all boredom amused. And I have chosen you, Mr. Trump, to KNEEL BEFORE ZOG.

Various communists #fundie facebook.com

Person A: I´m a stalinist pro-gulag communist so i wanted to ask you comrades about how much truth is behind all these labour-camp stories in the DPRK. I have heard south koreans get paid by the CIA for talking some fairytales of how they fled the DPRK.
Sources?

Person B: Even if there are gulags in the DPRK, the capitalists that are in it deserve it.

Person C: Why are people so fucking obsessed with a few prison tents in North Korea? You have fucking massive prisons the size of the entire fucking towns and cities in the USA, the US mega gulag prison industrial complexes, thousands of these all across the country, with over 2.3 million in prison, with several million more going in and out, for some of the most bullshit most ridiculous charges.

Person A: No my problem are not the gulags themselves, my problem is that there are those stories which just cannot be true like imprisoning the whole family because one of them did sth. The people interviewed must be payed by the CIA but i just cannot find some sources

Person C: Of course, I agree with you. The stories about North Korean prison tents are bogus propaganda. But on the other hand, if you look at the US, they really have a problem, a massive and gross human rights problem with their massive prison and justice system, injustices that parallels no other country in the world, and along with that a hyprocrisy and narcissim that parallels no other other country in the world. Before Americans especially their media and journos and the American human rights industrial complexes with their many fraudulent human rights groups and activisits go shouting and screaming about human rights issues in some other X country, they should be really looking themselves in the mirror.

Person A: but i am not talking about the US i am talking about the DPRK. The interviews exist and as long as we cannot prove them wrong we will have to face this topic when discussing with a western liberal.
I would personly throw reactionaries and criminals into a cold gulag where they do sth for society but never the family members and i cannot imagine this to be happening in best Korea.

Person C: Well, a lot of the western liberals are American. and Americans don't want to discuss their own problems, they rather invent some shit in some other country to divert their attention or use it as a pretext to start illegal wars or illegal invade or overthrow leaders in other countries. I think it's important to bring this up, to show the major hypocrisy and major narcissism of western liberals especially Americans. because it can cost millions of lives.

Person D: The prison camp system in the DPRK is a lie perpetrated by the Western Media and their handlers in the CIA and if it isn't a lie then it's good and justified.

Andre Vltchek #fundie 21stcenturywire.com

The Empire knows psychological warfare extremely well: to discredit China, it really has to be called capitalist. Or call it imperialist. Say it is ‘like us’. (“Like us” is definitely not good. The people on all continents hate ‘us’). Say that China is not helping African people by building infrastructure, hospitals and schools (although that is precisely what China is doing, if you ask Africans – something that no Western journo is bothering to do). Say that China is ‘following its own interests’, and that it is doing business (again, these days, a dirty word, except in a few Southeast Asian helplessly corrupt and servile ‘client’ states).

The same is true when it comes to Russia. The foreign policy of Russia is clearly anti-imperialist. In many ways, it is still that good old Soviet foreign policy – internationalist, egalitarian, based on humanism. Present-day Russian diplomats are brilliant, soft-spoken philosophers. The West can never match them. Therefore, it smears them, their country and everything that it stands for. President Putin is portrayed as some right-wing strongman and lunatic, and Russia as a capitalist state. It is thorough nonsense, as Russia is in many ways, increasingly, similar to its close ally – China. Russia counts on a mixed economy with a great accent on social welfare, and it is a country that is ready to defend and protect those who are brutalized by Western neo-colonialism. It occupies nobody, overthrows no governments. It is increasingly a good, solid and compassionate country, but the more it is, the more demonized it gets. The better it behaves, the more it gets smeared, mostly by being called ‘capitalist’, ‘right-wing’, an ‘oligarchy’. Well, great propaganda barks for sure; the Western demagogues and intelligence officers certainly know their trade.

Syria, oh how is it being defined by the Western demagogues? How it is being defamed! It is never called by what it really has been for decades – a Pan-Arab socialist state! Its ‘regime’ (a favorite British derogatory term, which I actually love to use against their own, British fascist, stale, passive-aggressive monarchy) is constantly branded as ‘dictatorial’. You will never hear expressions like ‘socialist’ or ‘internationalist’. You know why? Because, let me repeat it again, these terms, deep inside, evoke sympathy in the ears of people worldwide, even in the hearts of some Westerners, subconsciously.

‘Socialist’, ‘serving the people’ – you may smear it, but that is what people really want, and wanted for decades and centuries. That is what they have fought for, were dying for; on the barricades. Some instincts are still there, in people’s hearts, or do you think that they were sacrificing their lives in order to be governed by individuals like Macron or May?

Therefore, the socialists, not some European pseudo-traitors-socialists, but true socialists and Communists, are constantly branded by the West as ‘populists’, demagogues and often, even as right-wingers.

Steve McMahon #fundie returnofkings.com

Women Should Not Be Allowed To Vote

At the dawn of the 20th century, Britain had the greatest empire the world had ever seen. It stretched from the boreal vastness of Canada to the ice floes of the South Pole, from the scorching deserts of Egypt to the steamy jungles of New Guinea.

In 1900, British king Edward VII ruled over a quarter of the world’s population. His navy was the largest, most modern, and most ruthlessly efficient fighting force on the planet. His was the empire on which the sun never set, the undisputed global leader in science, technology, and commerce.

BEgoods

And then, in 1918, the British Parliament made a historic mistake. It gave women the vote. In 1920 the United States followed. Women’s suffrage rapidly spread around the world. Nearly 100 years later, how’s that working out for us?

Men were free in 1900
A man in Britain or the United States was free to say what he liked, subject only to the ancient laws on slander, treason, and incitement to crime. Men were the heads of their households, and they commanded respect as fathers and husbands. The majority paid no income tax. You were free to start a business without having to fend off legions of government busybodies. There was no welfare state, the only people who expected to live off their fellow men were beggars and drunks.

Western civilisation was unashamedly patriarchal and capitalist. Masculine virtues had propelled Europe out of the dark ages and colonised the New World, creating mighty new nations from scratch. Freed from feudalism and serfdom, the fertile mind of Western man produced an incredible series of discoveries and inventions. These allowed our forefathers to tame the forces of nature which had dominated and immiserated human beings since the first primitive hominids gazed in wonder and fear at a sunset on the African savannah.

Electricity let us push back the night. The steam engine brought us factories, mass production, and railways, which made mass prosperity and mass transit possible for the first time. Modern agriculture eliminated the ancient evil of famine in every country that bathed in the light of Western science. The world began to knit together as the primordial forerunner of the internet—the telegraph—brought regions and then nations and then continents together in almost instantaneous communication.

tesla_3

The intellectual crowning jewels of the West lay in its universities, from the medieval institutions of Europe to the Ivy League. These were places where serious and ferociously bright young men studied law, philosophy, and science. Where the secrets of the atom were probed, life-saving medical advances were made, astronomers mapped the cosmos, and engineers dreamed of ways to take us there, one day, into space.

The Western world in 1900 was not Utopia. There was poverty, bigotry, and injustice, but opportunity was real and a man with grit and ability could make something of himself. Many of the richest and most famous men of that era had been born poor and were self-taught.

Where stands Western civilisation today?

Men are not free in 2014
Most Western countries have a labyrinthine code of laws designed to jail you for saying the wrong things. Even in the United States, which stubbornly clings to its First Amendment, a man’s career can now be ruined and his reputation traduced if he offends against the latest dictates of political correctness.

Half or more of your income ends up in the pockets of the government, thanks to its bewildering array of taxes. Fathers and husbands—when they’re not being ridiculed as the butt of every joke on television—are second class citizens. If your wife decides she wants to take your house and your children away from you, she easily can with the full force of the law behind her.

If you try to start a business, you will find that not only are you not free to hire whoever you want, but you must also satisfy every whim of town planners, environmental bureaucrats, and health and safety commissars—all of them paid for by you, the taxpayer, to tell you what to do.

Another thing that you, the taxpayer, are funding is the welfare state. The welfare state exists to allow lazy people who don’t feel like working to live off you without going to the trouble of begging you for your money. The welfare state pays single mothers to squat out feral kids by multiple men without having to hold down a husband to pay for it all. The welfare state means the government is substitute Daddy for these women and their bastard offspring.

One fifth of US households now claim food stamps. That’s 47 million Americans, living in the richest and most successful society that has ever existed, where food is cheap and plentiful beyond the wildest dreams of people living 100 years ago, who are supposedly so pathetic and helpless that they need the government to feed them, as if they were children.

Our universities have become a bizarre combination of daycare facility, pick-up joint, and grotesque circus of left-wing drama. Universities are no longer places for serious thinkers to hone their minds. They’re places where braying young idiots go to learn to parrot feminist and Marxist slogans before reality punches them in the face with the realisation that their joke degrees are worthless.

gammamale2

The days have gone down in the West. Behind the hills, into shadow.

How did it come to this?
The state of modern society is a disaster for many fathers. But of all the self-inflicted wounds perpetrated on Western civilisation, votes for women was the most easily avoidable. It must have seemed like a good idea at the time, in 1918 and 1920, when Britain stood at her peak and the United States looked to the century ahead with supreme confidence. But women are not like men. They don’t think in the same way. They don’t understand or value freedom the way men do. Women have a herd mentality. Rugged individualism, healthy masculine debate, and raucous male laughter offend their sensibilities.

As soon as American women were allowed to vote, alcohol was banned in the United States. The temperance movement had been a female dominated nuisance for decades, but now hopelessly misguided female busybodies had electoral power. It was a farce that turned a nation into lawbreakers and birthed organised crime on a massive scale.

Slowly but inexorably, the United Kingdom and the United States, and other societies that allowed women to vote, began to tilt leftward. Welfare states were created, largely because women feel that it’s not “fair” to allow people to succeed or fail on their own merits. And it’s not “fair” that a woman should have to rely on the father of her children to support her, when she can make men in general pay for her upkeep through the tax and welfare systems.

Government, which had once been small and limited, began to spread its tentacles like a rape-beast from the sickest Japanese anime porn until it penetrated the lives of every citizen. Taxes started to rise in order to pay for all these new entitlements and programmes, and an entire caste of useless bureaucrats emerged to run them. Family and divorce law gradually warped into the anti-male Kafkaesque nightmare it is today because of politicians chasing female votes.

As with most female demands, capitulating to women’s suffragists didn’t satisfy them. Not content with invading the traditionally male space of political affairs, women started insinuating themselves into every other masculine sphere. The universities admitted them, which is why male students today find themselves harangued about imaginary “rape culture”. They swarmed into the workplace, which is why working men today find themselves terrified of sexual harassment or discrimination accusations from spiteful female co-workers. Even the military became feminised and sensitised, with deleterious consequences for the fighting man.

suffragewants

The modern religion of the West—political correctness—is every feminine vice writ large: bossy, deceitful, petty, and false. Almost everything that is wrong with modern life can be traced to the decline of masculine virtues and their replacement with feminine vices. For civilisation itself is the triumph of masculine energy, vision, and courage.

For the sake of our civilisation, for the sake of all men and women, we must undo this historic wrong turn. Women have no business voting in elections for public office, let them stick to voting for things they understand, like the X-Factor. This may seem like a quixotic idea. But remember—so was women’s suffrage, once.

If you like this article and are concerned about the future of the Western world, check out Roosh's book Free Speech Isn't Free. It gives an inside look to how the globalist establishment is attempting to marginalize masculine men with a leftist agenda that promotes censorship, feminism, and sterility. It also shares key knowledge and tools that you can use to defend yourself against social justice attacks. Click here to learn more about the book. Your support will help maintain our operation.

66wow99 #racist eurocanadian.ca

Ladies and Gents (yes, only two possible), it's self-preservation. Any white persons in position of power, will parrot "diversity is our strength" simply because it puts food on their table, and pays their mortgage. Anything less than towing this line will blackball them from their respective industries. But, what these Whites apparently fail to realize is that it will destroy their children's future in this once great country built by the ingenuity, sweat and tenacity of our European ancestors. If I were these people's child, I'd round-house them to the head.

In the meantime, it is horrifying to witness Whites eating their own.

CH #fundie heartiste.wordpress.com

The InfoWars saga (and Daily Stormer before it) are meant to be object lessons to discourage the others. The swarm-like nature of the operation by leftoids, against a readily identifiable and personalized crimethinker, betrays its real purpose: to silence an entire segment of the population.

Active censorship is just the tip of the speech-chilling iceberg. Like I wrote, leftoids are playing with a super-weapon which in their hubris think they can control without blowback. They will overreach, as they’re doing now, and the weapon will turn on its wielder.

There is only one way this super-weapon remains in the control of one faction for a sufficient length of time to generationally entrench its power: by ratcheting up the lethality and area of effect of its payload. Mass censorship requires increasingly totalitarian suppressions to prevent its use from provoking an even more righteous counter-attack.

Mass murderers like Stalin knew this. And here we go again.

Gunny G #fundie moonbattery.com

Your grasp of US history in pathetic.

The North meddled in Southern affairs for years prior to the attack on Ft Sumter. Slavery was dying thanks to the cotton gin and harvester machines but the abolitionists kept the pot boiling. Also, the North and the Feds used economic sanctions on the South coming up to 1861. Kinda like the Feds do NOW when Obama takes 1.6 MILLION acres of “federal land” off of the drilling table.

How can the Federal government usurp the 10th Amendment, seize the lands of a State, and then prevent the State from developing the resources to the benefit of its citizens.

THAT is just one reason why I support secession.

Welcome to ZOG-World #fundie youtube.com

[This is from the video description.]

Wartorn 1861 -- 2010 is a documentary by HBO about Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. While being an HBO production the documentary is bound to be full of shit, it does in many ways prove what I have been the first to say out loud. What "experts" classify as PTSD is really conscience catching up with monsters who preyed upon the weak. It's the remorse reminding the filth who murdered, raped and pillaged the innocents that they may have gotten away with it legally, but there are beyond Earthly powers that saw what they did and will hold them accountable.

I have always been very vocal about how nothing speaks "divine justice" quite as loudly as a ZOG mercenary committing suicide. I have always cheered when one of the filth eventually went ahead with it and I've always been clear about knowing the real reason why they did it -- the images of children they had raped, of the elderly they had executed in cold blood while laughing in their faces, of terrified families helplessly at the mercy of the murderers who made it fun and games to kill them in such a way so as to cause maximum suffering -- all these images came back to haunt them.

Christian Answers #fundie christiananswers.net

There is no other book, ancient or modern, like [the bible]. The vague, and usually erroneous, prophecies of people like Jeanne Dixon, Nostradamus, Edgar Cayce, and others like them are not in the same category at all, and neither are other religious books such as the Koran, the Confucian Analects, and similar religious writings. Only the Bible manifests this remarkable prophetic evidence, and it does so on such a tremendous scale as to render completely absurd any explanation other than divine revelation.

Fr. John+ #racist occidentaldissent.com

Charles Blow should be the first to feel the Master’s lash, come Dixie 2.0.

Do you realize the ‘anti-black’ anger this dumb nigger is generating via columns such as thi, and, all the while, thinking that he’s actually the EQUAL of a white man, with his suit and smug-ass face?

Come the Revolution, niggers will find no ‘hiding place’ (a la Corrie ten Boom) south of the Mason-Dixon line. Why should they? Four HUNDRED YEARS of anti-assimilation attitudes, ONE HUNDRED FIFTY YEARS of uppityness, and FORTY YEARS of mandated ‘equality’ has taught them NOTHING- just look at Mr. Smugass, himself, over at the “Darkie House” in D.C.

As I said on this forum, months ago, and as I have been chronicling on my blog for the last year or more, the best advertisement for a Whites-only Nation, and a complete disenfranchisment of BRA, is niggers themselves.

And they don’t realize how utterly repugnant they are…… to everyone.

Patrick Scrivener #conspiracy reformation.org

THE AMORAL MAJORITY STRONG CONSPIRACY IN 1979

THE AMORAL MAJORITY WAS FORMED BY JERRY FAKEWELL IN 1979 FOR THE EXPRESS PURPOSE OF MAKING RONALD REAGAN ACTING PRESIDENT AND MARGARET THATCHER DE FACTO PRESIDENT!!
Most of the information in this expose was taken from 2 autobiographies of a man claiming to be Jerry Falwell. Only a BLIND man or woman could mistake him for the real Jerry Falwell who graduated from Baptist Bible College (BBC) in 1956.

Most people like to see new faces, but our Creator made us with only one face during our lifetime. Additionally, an adult's height does not change after he/she becomes an adult.

The "Jerry Falwell" who founded the Moral Majority in 1979 was not the same Jerry Falwell who pastored the Thomas Road Baptist Church in Lynchburg, Virginia.

I call that now deceased anonymous actor "JERRY FAKEWELL."

The Falwell twins were born in Lynchburg, Virginia, on August 11. 1933. Their father's name was Carey Hezekiah, and their mother's name was Helen Virginia. When twins are born it is impossible to tell which twin is a normal human being and which twin is the seed or offspring of Apollyon. In 1933, twins were rare in the U.S., but now they are a virtual epidemic!

It was impossible to tell at birth which was the normal human baby and which baby was the son of Apollyon!

According to the autobiography of "Jerry Fakewell," it was Jerry himself who was the evil twin.

However, Gene was the real "hell raiser," and one of his "practical jokes" almost killed his high school Latin teacher.

In the second grade, the twins were separated because the teacher could not handle both Falwells:

I do remember the awful moment my brother Gene and I were separated by our second-grade teacher, Mrs. Hunter. She didn't think I belonged in the second grade; so, with the principal's approval, she skipped me on to third. From that day my brother and I were in different classes. We never knew exactly why she advanced me one whole year. Looking back, I think she knew that one Falwell was enough for any teacher to handle and she preferred Gene to me (Fakewell, An Autobiography, p. 58).

Jerry was indeed the normal twin and Gene was more than any teacher could handle.

Jerry graduated with high honors and he was the class valedictorian.

In high school, Gene hated learning Latin, so instead of bringing an apple to the teacher, he brought a RAT, and almost killed her with fright.

Gene either dropped out or was expelled as an inveterate "hell-raiser.

After graduating from the Bible College, Jerry returned to his hometown of Lynchburg, and founded the Thomas Road Baptist Church with just 35 members.


In 1956, Jerry founded the Thomas Road Baptist Church in Lynchburg.

Soon afterward, he started a local radio program called "The Old Time Gospel Hour."

A TV version of the "Old Time Gospel Hour" soon followed.


In 1958, Jerry married Marcel Pate, a local girl from Lynchburg.

They seemed to be another perfect partnership as Jean took care of the home and children and Jerry did the preaching.

Jerry Jr. was born on June 17, 1962, followed by Jean Ann in 1964, and Jonathan in 1966.

The ERA, or Evil Rules America Amendment, was only a small dark cloud on the horizon during the 1960's. However, that small dark cloud was soon to grow into a monstrous hurricane of destruction that threatened the ruin and wreck of the United States of Israel.

In 1969, long tall Jerry Falwell was killed in a plane crash and replaced by his twin!!

Sometime in early 1969, the real Jerry Falwell disappeared from Lynchburg. The most likely cause of his disappearance was a plane crash. Many times plane crashes leave absolutely no remains of the victim or victims.

The real Jerry Falwell was TALL, at least 6' 5," and that was why he was captain of the Bible College basketball team.

He didn't shrink in the intervening years.

Around 1969, a "businessman" donated a small Cessna 310 to the church.

"Jerry" claimed that he almost died from a broken rib in California, but that was just a cover for the fatal plane crash.

We know that the British Secret Service specializes in car and plane crashes. Here is a quote from the autobiography of the man who impersonated the real Jerry Falwell:

Late in the 1960's when I was still traveling 50,000 miles in my Buick to hold preachers' meetings or evangelistic crusades in churches around the country, my son Jerry Jr. would often accompany me. And though he didn't mind missing school and was pretty bright enough to make up the work he missed, that first little Cessna 310 that was given the church by a businessman named Gene Dixon made it even easier for Jerry Jr. to attend the meetings. (Fakewell, Strength for the Journey, p. 277).

I don't think the real Jerry Falwell was flying around the country with his 7-year-old son in the cockpit. Whatever happened, the long tall Jerry Falwell disappeared after 1969. That is why the Apostle Paul warns us over and over that false brethren can be very, very dangerous (II Corinthians 11:26).

Gene Falwell replaced his twin brother Jerry in 1969

By 1969, the economy of Lynchburg was dependent on the TV, radio, and publishing ministry of Jerry Falwell. Many people were dismayed and horrified at his very untimely death at such a young age. However, there was a Jerry substitute readily available in his twin brother Gene.

The Amoral Majority was founded by "Jerry Fakewell" in 1979

It is beyond belief but in 1979 a man who looked nothing like Gene Falwell made his appearance on the national stage. I call the anonymous actor Jerry Fakewell, and his main goal was to make Ronald Reagan acting President.

The Presidential race of 1980 was as critical as the election of 2016. In 1980, the very fate of the nation hung in the balance because a second term for the doppelgänger Carter would have led to ratification of the Evil Rules America Amendment.


2 titanic forces, with different agendas, were at work in 1979.

The election was only a year away, and the reelection of the Carter double would have meant the ratification of the Evil Rules America Amendment.

The election of Ronald Reagan would have placed "Iron Lady" Margaret Thatcher in the White House.

Both options were deadly . . . but the Equal Wrongs Amendment would have been the deadlier....Under instructions from Margaret Thatcher, Reagan would have reignited the Cold War . . . and perhaps World War III. That World WAR III didn't happen was thanks to the Russians who could not be provoked into firing the first shot.

If it wasn't for the Iran Hostage Crisis and the Amoral Majority, the doppelgänger Carter would have been reelected, and the Equal Wrongs Amendment would have been ratified.

In 1980, the Amoral Majority elected Ronald Reagan as acting President!!

Greed won over corruption in the all-important race of the dopplegänger versus Ronald Reagan. For the military-industrial complex there was no money to be made in sex-change operations or combining male and female bathrooms.

However, they stood to make billions in the unprecedented peacetime Reagan Administration military buildup.

Only a month after his inauguration, the British Cleopatra arrived at the White House and gave President Reagan his marching orders.

He was to concentrate exclusively on bringing down the Soviet Union.

Something totally unexpected happened: the Argentines invaded the Falkland Islands.

The U.S. Cleopatra did not campaign for the ERA in Illinois!!

Amazingly, "Hillary" Clinton—the U.S. Cleopatra—did not campaign for the Evil Rules America Amendment in her "home" state of Illinois. That was because she would have blown her cover, and people would have been asking her about the fate of the real Hillary Rodham.

Doppelgänger Hillary Clinton was the driving force behind the Evil Rules America Amendment.

According to "Hillary," she was born in Park Ridge, a suburb of Chicago, in 1947.

Her "home" state of Illinois was one of the battleground states, yet she never showed up once to be a cheerleader for ratification.

Since it was her lifelong ambition to see the ratification of the ERA, it is amazing that "Hillary" never showed up once in her home state to campaign against the Women Who Wanted to be Women.

One of the most contentious political battles ever waged was the Illinois battle to ratify the ERA.

It was a no holds barred, down to earth political dogfight.

Even a monkey, who didn't want them messing with his GENES, showed up to help the women fight the ERA.

It is beyond belief but Hillary never showed up once to battle against the women who wanted to be women!

We can thank our Great JEHOVAH that the Evil Rules America Amendment did not pass, and the fulfillment of this prophecy of Daniel was delayed once again:

And he (Antichrist) shall plant the tabernacle of his palace between the seas in the glorious holy mountain; yet he shall come to his end, and no one will help him (Daniel 11:45).

The Meme Policeman #fundie facebook.com

(In response to a meme about Trump praising Robert E. Lee....)

This meme isn’t limited to the hyper partisan Occupy Democrats. In an embarrassing display of journalism, major media outlets from NBC, to CNN, to the Washington Post all ran headlines proclaiming “Trump called Robert E. Lee a great general”. Without context, the implication is “there Trump goes again, praising white supremacists”. With context, the headlines are highly misleading and OD’s assertion is outright false.
In the comments is a screenshot of the fuller context of Trump’s remarks, make sure to read it. The speech was clearly praising General Grant, not Lee! He was speaking in Ohio, after all, the birthplace of Grant. In a rambling historical account, which only Trump could give, he recounted how Lincoln ended up choosing Grant, despite his drinking problem, because none of his other generals knew how to win. The “incredible” accolade clearly referred to Grant, not Lee, and he called Lee a great general as a foil to praise Grant.
But, calling Lee a great general shouldn’t be controversial anyway. He was, objectively, a great general. That’s why the Union wanted him on their side. Acknowledging his battle prowess does not condone slavery anymore than acknowledging OJ Simpson was a great football player condones murder. Since Occupy seems so horrified at a president calling Robert E. Lee great, let’s see what some other presidents and historical figures said.
-Franklin Roosevelt said this in dedicating a monument to Lee in 1936: “I am very happy to take part in this unveiling of the statue of General Robert E. Lee. All over the United States we recognize him as a great leader of men, as a great general. But, also, all over the United States I believe that we recognize him as something much more important than that. We recognize Robert E. Lee as one of our greatest American Christians and one of our greatest American gentlemen.” [1]
-Winston Churchill once said, “Lee was the noblest American who had ever lived and one of the greatest commanders known to the annals of war.”[2]
-President Truman personally visited Lee's statue at Gettysburg and wrote this to his daughter, “I stood on the spot where General Robert E. Lee stood while the famous and immortal Pickett made his charge…I picked two little flowers from the foot of the Virginia Monument which stands on the spot where Lee stood and I am sending them to you. They will remind you of how a great man takes a terrible defeat…Lee didn’t blame anybody. He accepted the responsibility…”[3]
-Of the 4 portraits in President Eisenhower's office, one was Lee's. He remarked, “General Robert E. Lee was, in my estimation, one of the supremely gifted men produced by our Nation. He believed unswervingly in the Constitutional validity of his cause which until 1865 was still an arguable question in America; he was thoughtful yet demanding of his officers and men, forbearing with captured enemies but ingenious, unrelenting and personally courageous in battle, and never disheartened by a reverse or obstacle. Through all his many trials, he remained selfless almost to a fault and unfailing in his belief in God. Taken altogether, he was noble as a leader and as a man, and unsullied as I read the pages of our history."[4]
-JFK said, "As a New Englander, I recognize that the South is still the land of Washington, who made our Nation – of Jefferson, who shaped its direction – and of Robert E. Lee who, after gallant failure, urged those who had followed him in bravery to reunite America in purpose and courage.”[5]
-LBJ used Lee's name in support of civil rights legislation, "If we are to heal our history and make this Nation whole, prosperity must know no Mason-Dixon line and opportunity must know no color line. Robert E. Lee, a great son of the South, a great leader of the South–and I assume no modern day leader would question him or challenge him–Robert E. Lee counseled us well when he told us to cast off our animosities, and raise our sons to be Americans.”[6]
-Jimmy Carter recently came out against removal of confederate landmarks in the south. As president, he said this in his eulogy to the Americans killed in the Iran hostage crisis, “This very land once belonged to General Robert E. Lee. Like these eight men, he was a soldier whose affection for his home and family called him to a life of service that often meant hardship, loneliness, and long separation from those he loved and even from the Nation which he most loved."[7]
-President Reagan said this, “Robert E. Lee, this southerner who criticized secession and called slavery a great moral wrong, would become himself an American legend; yet a man who thought-though he rode off into myth and glory, would suffer cruelly in his own time. After the dissolution of his cause, he would work to bind up the Nation’s wounds"[8]
-As Arkansas governor, Bill Clinton signed legislation combining Martin Luther King day with Robert E. Lee day.[9]
[1]http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=15303
[2]http://www.vahistorical.org/…/virginia-histor…/lee-and-grant
[3]https://www.trumanlibrary.org/…/lar…/folder1/1935julytxt.htm
[4]https://www.neh.gov/…/how-did-robert-e-lee-become-american-…
[5]http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=74076
[6]http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=26585
[7]http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=33388
[8]http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=40134
[9]http://www.npr.org/…/arkansas-to-split-its-holidays-for-mar…

William Schnoebelen #fundie chick.com

Therefore, here are just a handful of the tragic deaths reported (as of this writing) to be related to D&D:

The "Freeway Killer," Vernon Butts, who committed suicide in his cell in 1987 while being held as a suspect in a string of murders, was an avid D&D player.51
D&D player (14 years old) commits suicide by hanging, 1979, name withheld by parents' request.
D&D player (17 years old) Michael Dempsey, Lynnwood, WA. suicide by gunshot wound to the head, 5/19/81. Witnesses saw him trying to summon up D&D demons just minutes before his death.
D&D player (age not mentioned) Steve Loyacano, Castle Rock, CO., suicide by carbon monoxide poisoning, 10/14/82. Police report satanic writings and a suicide note liked the death to D&D.
D&D player (21 years old) Timothy Grice, Lafayette, CO., suicide by shotgun blast, 1/17/83. Detective reports noted, "D&D became a reality. He thought he was not constrained to this life, but could leave [it] and return because of the game."
D&D player (18 years old) Harold T. Collins, Marion, OH., suicide by hanging, 4/29/83. Collins was noted to be "possessed" by D&D as if he were living the game.
D&D player (16 years old) Daniel Erwin, Lafayette, CO., murder by brother's shotgun blast to head, 11/2/84 (right after Halloween). Death was apparently the result of a death pact as part of the game.
D&D player (12 years old) Steve Erwin (see above) suicide by gunshot, 11/2/84. Detective report: "No doubt D&D cost them their lives."52
D&D player (no age given) Joseph Malin, Salt Lake City, UT., pled guilty to first degree murder 3/2/88 and was sentenced to life in prison. He killed a 13-year-old girl while acting out the fantasy-role game. The girl had been raped, her throat cut, and she had been stabbed twice in the chest. Police said his "violent urges were fed by 'extreme involvement in the fantasy role-playing game Dungeons and Dragons.'"53
D&D player (14 years old) Tom Sullivan, Jr. got into Satanism and ended up stabbing his mother to death, arranging a ritual circle (from D&D) in the middle of the living room floor and lit a fire in its midst. Fortunately, his dad and little brother were awakened by a smoke detector; but by then, Tom, Jr. had slashed his wrists and throat with his Boy Scout knife and died in the snow in a neighbor's yard. (1/19/88, Amarillo, TX).54
D&D player Danny Remeta went on an eight-state crime spree, including murder. In an interview in the DETROIT FREE PRESS, he asked, "Have you ever heard of Dungeons and Dragons? That had a lot to do with it … It is not just a board game. It's a lot deeper than a board game. I've got five friends that are locked up for the same thing [murder] right now because of the game."55
D&D player (14 years old) Sean Sellers was convicted of killing his parents and a convenience store clerk in Greeley, Oklahoma (1/11/87). He was the youngest inmate of death row in the country before being executed for his crimes. His involvement in hard-core Satanism began with D&D, according to his own testimony. Praise the Lord; he became a Born Again Christian some time before his execution!56

John C. Wright #fundie scifiwright.com

[He’s welcome to spout his anti-gay bigotry all he likes…..he and other artists [...] are beginning to find that this has consequences. If they feel the pinch as a result, they’ll get no pity from me.]

I hereby to apply to you the same rules you apply to Mr Card: you have spoken your slanders against me and mine, and you should “find this has consequences” and be blackballed. You are banned.

Had you spared any pity for him, I would have had pity for you.

It is not in my self interest to help you spread your venom against me, by lending you a public forum to advocate that thought police should punish science fiction writers for questioning conformity, and it is beyond the bounds of reason that you should presume on my good nature to think I should.

What makes you think you have the right to be patiently heard, when you are advocating denying that right to other men, men by any measure better than you? Better than you, indeed, by your own admission.

For what is the political correctness you support? It is a cult. What do you worship in this cult?

You worship your phallus.

You support the sexual deviants because you correctly see that any hindrance, even so much as a polite word in opposition, to the prodigious indulgence of sexual vice which forms the backbone of your — I cannot call it a philosophy — your phallus cult would show your own vices in a true light.

Not even nature, not even reality, can be allowed to form a barrier to your almighty phallus that you bow and serve and any cruel or vile or unnatural impulse you seek to indulge, or see others indulge. Your only enemy is temperance.

You correctly see that if men stuffing their members into the smelly rectums of other men is even so much as frowned upon, that your own member-stuffing into whatever harlots or trollops you seek to conquer and exploit would be condemned.

Your enemy is chastity, virginity, romance, beauty.

But you dare not admit this.

And so you lie, and so you take up the banner of intolerance, injustice, indecency, with the zeal of the witch-hunter. In this case, the witches are not accused of selling their souls to the devil, but failing to do so.

You think you will never pay for your lies and hypocrisies to that Power which gave you power of speech. You are sadly mistaken.

wetwareproblem #fundie wetwareproblem.tumblr.com

hey there! i have a question i'd like your input on, if you have the spoons to discuss these two topics. (trigger warning: harassment, violence, fasc*sm.) i know you have policy of no harassment, no verbal violence, etc, against people who have done horrific things or have dehumanizing and violent opinions, on tumblr. but i also see you endorse physical IRL violence against fash. this is a duality ive struggled with- how to justify "do not engage" and also "fight them off the street". (1/2)

(2/2) (cw: harassment, violence, fasc*sm, cont’d); im going with “engage offline if Very sure, and if its safe to do so andor if consequences seem worth bearing” and “do not engage online” as a compromise, since i can’t be certain online most time. or else, “do not engage online unless absolutely sure, witnessed with own eyes or ears, that this person is Active threat” but with that, theres risk of creating “acceptable targets”. inb4 slippery slope, but im legit worried. (ok2 publish if u want)

Okay. SM here. I’ve gotten special permission to answer this one, since it’s really more in my wheelhouse overall.

Well. To begin with, we’re in the kinda unique position of having dual policies on a lot of things. I endorse the “bring a bat” mentality… from a distance, but it’s Ashlyn who would actually show up with one. (We’re still negotiating boundaries on who wins in conflicts like these.)

But speaking more generally? The key questions to me as regards morals and ethics are “What impact will this have,” and “How do I win?” I want to see a world in which marginalized people are less marginalized, where we’re accepted as full and equal members of society as we are. How do I bring that about most effectively?

Hate-mobbing has a lot of black marks against it from this angle. It’s an escalation - responding to speech with violence. It makes people miserable and harms their mental health. It more often than not makes them double down on hateful politics. And it’s poisonous to rational thinking and winning strategies.

To expand on that last part: The fundamental problem with saying “But this time I’m right, so the hateful tactics that oppressors use on me are justified here” is that, by and large, the oppressors are saying the same thing. The Slymepit, Gamergate, Swarmfront? They all think of themselves as oppressed by a conspiracy of marginalized people. They think that justifies the shit they do. They’re sitting there going “Well, sure, it’s evil when those uppity SJW types do it, but this time I’m right!” And frankly, it feels really good to say that, to engage like that. it feels like vindication, like justice. Revenge usually does. So it encourages you to think a little less about it and lash out a little more.

But revenge isn’t justice. Revenge doesn’t actually accomplish our goal of making the world better for marginalized people. And it does make us gloss over an important question, one that requires the exact sort of difficult and careful and considered thought it discourages:

How do you know that you’re not falling into the same trap as those guys?

Finally, particularly here on tumblr, it fails the “winning” test. A lot of people spewing bigoted rhetoric - a lot of them - are kids just making their first forays into forming political opinions. They’re going to fuck up and do/say/think something wrong. Sometimes it’s going to be terrible. But if we respond with a hate mob, not only are we bullying a child, we’re making sure that kid’s first exposure to us is a rage-filled mob that wants them to die because they said the wrong thing. These kids could have been talked around or educated, but now they’ve seen that and they know we’re The Enemy. They’ll always be looking for the knife in every word we say.

When we’re talking about fighting fascism, though, we’re looking at a different situation. We’re looking at people who have already been hardened. There’s no talking someone around or educating them by the time they’re ready to engage in actual violence against you. They won’t listen to a single word you say - if you’re an Acceptable Target for violence, then they already see the knife in everything you say or do, whether or not it’s actually there.

(And yes, this should be taken as a general warning against Acceptable Targets, because you’re not immune to this way of thinking either.)

So with words off the table, we’re left with the question: how do we actually stop the violence? Police and authorities aren’t going to help - they’re complicit in it, when they’re not actively engaging. The only people we can rely on are our siblings in this fight. And the only tool that has been shown to get the job done is violence.

I know this seems like I’m just going back on the Acceptable Target principle above, but… well, to me, at least, there’s a clear line. You can’t turn to violence as an acceptable tool without endorsing its use to resist your violence. And yes, that works both ways - if you’re going to engage in antifa action, then getting hurt might be the cost of doing business, and you have to be willing to pay that cost when it comes. But frankly, sometimes that price is worth it.

So it seems that the only point of confusion remaining is “Why is fascism categorically violence?” And sure, a lot of it doesn’t look like things we associate with the word ‘violence.’ A lot of the time it’s holding rallies, distributing leaflets, etc.

But every one of those leaflets, every one of those rallies, is a veiled threat. The core of fascism is and always has been “surrender what we want or we will take it by force.” And people who have been targeted by it know this. They see that, and they know that they can be hurt or killed anywhere, at any time, by someone like that. They are less safe, and their mental health is directly impacted, long before the first blow lands.

Fascism is violence against marginalized people for simply existing, and the tool that stops it is violence against oppressors for harming innocents. And y’know what? All things considered, I’m okay with that.

Atavisionary #fundie atavisionary.com

However, I am not entirely convinced that this student’s lack of interest both in the book and in the essay were all that bad in the grand scheme of things. Specifically, the summaries I have since read on this book strongly suggests to me that it is a very clear case of progressive propaganda being forced onto unwitting children. In fact, I was at once reminded of my own experience in high school with similar propaganda. “Speak” by Laurie Halse Anderson. Where as speak was only concerned with feminists conceptions of rape, “The Kite Runner” appears to focus more on Muslims/Afghans (although it also goes into rape as well).

In summaries of the plot, it follows two boys in Kabul who play with kites together. One is of an Islamic sect which is considered lower class than the other. The lower class boy in one scene protects his superior from being beaten up, while in another, later scene the higher class boy does nothing to stop the former from being raped (by a male). Typical prog lionization of lower classes; as well as an awkward insertion of rape. Later the high class boy escapes the soviet invasion and moves to America as a refugee where he experiences guilt at his luck generally (he regularly imagined the hard lives of his friends back home) as well as specifically with respect to this friend he didn’t save from the rape. Finally, he finds out that this friend who he didn’t save from a rape both had died and also had a son during the general turmoil in the country. He goes back and saves this friend’s son and brings him to America as well.

In this story we seem to have both support of cat-lady style saving of refugees as well as touching on rape hysteria. There was probably little mention that there might be a connection between the ethnicity involved and tendency for rape and violence. At least that is how it seems. Without reading the book, I can’t be entirely sure of how much it is in fact propaganda and how much it is just a story (though my own experience with progressive propaganda leads me to a specific guess). I won’t comment further on the content of the story itself. However, the student also showed me his rubric and instructions on what topics were allowed for the essay. All of the designated topics were clearly progressive points of interest (such as “human rights,” which is what this student chose) which leaves no doubt that whatever merits this story has on its own, if any, it is being used in schools to indoctrinate children into progressive positions.

...

Anyway, I focused mainly on non-content related suggestions to improve his essay. However, I also made a point that when he spoke of human rights he did so in a very general sense, yet all of the examples from the story were from a very specific group of people with a very specific religion. After all, we don’t hear about Theravada Buddhists raping and murdering Mahayana Buddhists. To generalize Muslim culture in Afghanistan as if it were a world wide issue for every group of people is inaccurate and absurd. This is as much crimethink as I dared to inject into the situation, but I think the point was taken and will be considered by the student. In my head, I thought facetiously that the human rights issue he should write about is forcing young children in schools across the country to read and write about progressive propaganda; with their essay conclusion being determined in advance of writing. I did not say this however, as I anticipated the comment would not be appreciated by the adults who would no doubt hear about it. If you are a parent, I would suggest keeping an eye out for this story in your child’s curriculum so that you can do any necessary damage control when they are forced to regurgitate prog propaganda as a graded assignment.

Matt Forney #fundie mattforney.com

[A transcript of Matt Forney's speech at the recent Identitarian Ideas IX conference]

I don’t think I need to remind anyone that the election of President Donald Trump was a turning point in American and European history. For our entire lives, our overlords in the government and media have told us that we were on the losing side of history. That we were destined to fail. That the future of our civilization was rainbows, unicorns and chocolate chip cookies, fruits Frenching their boyfriends in front of empty churches, neon-lit mosques eclipsing the cities our forefathers labored to build, and finally, being finessed out of our neighborhoods by swarthy foreigners who stare at our sisters, wives and girlfriends the way lions stare at gazelles.

But for now, the arc of the moral universe has been redirected.

The arc of the political universe has also been redirected. One of the most important achievements of the past two years has been the total destruction of the mainstream American right-wing. My friend Edwin Oslan calls them “Conservatism, Inc.,” the alt-right calls them “cuckservatives,” but regardless of how we abuse them, they were the primary impediment to real, nationalist change in the West. It is they, not the left, who are the biggest losers in the age of Trump. Right now, the left is so excited about the prospect of “resisting” the President that they almost seem sexually aroused by it. It’s your National Reviews, your Weekly Standards, your Rick Wilsons and Rich Lowrys and rich finks in general who have lost everything in the God-Emperor’s ascent.

I’m not just talking about the neocons, the loudest, yappiest poodles echoing in the cuckservative kennel. There’s a whole world of inanity beyond the armchair quarterbacking of soft, pudgy Manhattan intellectuals renaming French fries to “freedom fries” or calling on poor men’s sons to fight their wars for them. Mr. Trump has helped sledgehammer the foundations of American cuckservatism, and we are now dancing among the ruins.

A common refrain during the election was that Donald Trump was not a “true” conservative. The myth of the post-National Review right-wing in America is that the United States was intended to be a different society than the nations of Europe, one bound not by blood and soil but by the liberties granted by the Constitution: the proposition nation. In the minds of the geldings who believe this myth, such as, for example, the guy at CPAC who denounced us as “left-wing fascists” a couple of days ago, Trump and the alternative right are a rejection of these core American values, a return to the bad old days of European nationalism, endless war and diminutive Austrian men with funny mustaches.

The problem with myths is that they have a bad habit of being false. The proposition nation so beloved of William F. Buckley and Norman Podhoretz is nothing but Saran wrap stretched over the casserole of white America. While it’s true that the Constitution represented a break from the European tradition of monarchy, the ideals that fueled the American Revolution were derived from Enlightenment thinkers such as John Locke and implemented by Americans of European descent. Without Europe’s peoples or its philosophies, there is no Constitution, there is no right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, and there is no United States of America.

The “golden age” of immigration to Ellis Island, so beloved of cucks and leftists and a fundamental underpinning of the proposition nation myth, is itself a crock of garbage. As Jim Goad detailed in his book The Redneck Manifesto, during the 19th century, corporations lobbied the U.S. government to bring in Italians, Chinese and other foreigners to break the backs of labor unions and lower wages for the average worker. The lie that immigrants do the jobs that Americans don’t want to do has a far longer history than you think.

But myths cannot take root unless they contain some truth. You may not believe that Jesus Christ died for your sins, but that doesn’t necessarily mean that the Romans didn’t nail him to the cross. Similarly, while the U.S. is hardly a proposition nation, bound together only by the Bill of Rights, its history as a colonial state has kept white Americans from forming a cohesive, rooted culture.

Rare are the Americans who are so attached to their hometowns that they don’t want to leave them. Packing your bags and moving to another state, even if it’s on the other side of the country, is as American a tradition as sportsball and diabetes. From the settlement of Jamestown and the landing at Plymouth Rock to the Louisiana Purchase to the California gold rush to the rise of the Sun Belt in the 1950’s and sixties, if white Americans didn’t like where they were, they went somewhere else. I know that when I was a kid, I dreamt of nothing more than getting out of my hometown of Syracuse, New York, that decaying Rust Belt ghetto midway between New York City and Toronto.

People who are constantly moving from point A to point B cannot put down roots and develop a sense of self. In fact, recent scientific research has shown that the brains of those who live in the same place their entire life develop far differently than those who migrate to new locales. White Americans never developed a unified sense of who they are because they’ve never stayed in one place long enough for the question to come up. And that’s before we get into mass immigration, media propaganda and the other myriad ways that cultural Marxists have tried to destroy the spirits of white Americans.

Now, we do have strong regional identities: as explained in the book Albion’s Seed, the United States was settled by four distinct groups from the British Isles, and our politics and culture is in many ways a continuation of the struggle between the Cavaliers and the Roundheads during the English Civil War. But no singular white consciousness has ever existed in the U.S. Ask a Swede, a Pole, or a Hungarian who he is and what his nation means to him, and you’ll get concrete answers rooted in cultural memory going back centuries. Ask the same question of an American and you’ll quickly find out that there’s no “there” there. At the moment, mindless consumerism is the only duct tape holding the U.S. together.

So, yes, the cucks have—had—a glimmer of a point: as a settler state of European mutts, the U.S. was not merely an extension of its fatherland. But that has come to an end, not because of Donald Trump or the alt-right, but ultimately because of the left themselves.

Years ago, when I was skeptical of white advocates and tribalism, I wrote on my old blog In Mala Fide that a political movement like the alt-right would never work because whites in the U.S. don’t define themselves by their whiteness, unlike blacks. A reader of mine interjected by saying that whites have already been defined as white, in the negative, by the left. And he was right.

To be white is to be the world’s whipping boy. It means being blamed for everything from poverty in Africa to environmental degradation to women not having enough space to sit down on the subway. It means being told to shut up and sit down, that your opinion is worthless because of your “privilege,” and that the eventual disappearance of your people and culture is a sign of progress.

To be white, straight and a man is even worse, because you’re told that your natural masculine instincts, your natural desires to bed and wed women make you an oppressive misogynist. In 21st Century Parody World, six-year olds are allowed to take dangerous hormones so they can become a funhouse mirror version of the opposite sex, but not asking your wife for permission before you kiss her can land you in prison for rape. And if you’re not happy with this arrangement, you’re expected to sate yourself with degenerate Japanese cartoons and pornography, the bread and circuses of the globalist empire. That’s how mad the Marxists are: they don’t merely want to destroy our culture and identity; they want to destroy the very things that make us human.

Sun Tzu stated that when you have surrounded your enemy, you must give him a way to escape, or else he will fight you to the death, having nothing to lose. The left never learned that lesson, because they’ve pursued whites—white men—everywhere they’ve gone, leaving them no quarter and no place to call their own. Even video games, long the province of virginal nerds, were not safe, which is what sparked the GamerGate movement three years ago, the first successful backlash against cultural Marxism in most of our lifetimes. The white men of gaming saw leftists trying to subvert their favorite hobby, one they retreated to after society rejected them, and said no more. Enough. This line you shall not cross.

It was this spark that ignited the pile of TNT that was the Trump campaign and the alternative right. The average Trump voter isn’t explicitly aware of all the issues that we are versed in. They don’t know everything that we know. But they know, deep down, that something is wrong. They know that fifty years of mass non-white immigration and globalist free trade have ruined them financially and placed their lives and that of their children in peril. And they see, day in and day out, the chattering classes tell them that they are the problem. They see liberal arts dilettantes in Brooklyn brownstones, rent paid courtesy of Daddy’s credit line, banging out “thinkpieces” every day claiming that all the world’s ills are thanks to those stupid white rednecks in Kentucky, Michigan or Pennsylvania, and as soon as they kick the bucket and give way to all these newcomers from Mexico, we’ll be all better off.

White Americans saw this repulsive display and they said no more. Enough. This line you shall not cross. And they turned out to support a champion who would fight for them. Donald Trump is the first politician in years who treats white Americans as a group with interests of their own, interests that are worth defending. While he is far from the alt-right ideologically, Trump’s nationalist presidency is aiding the maturation of white America from an empty, consumerist frontier into a people with an identity of their own, one that runs deeper than pop culture effluvia and waxing autistic about “muh Constitution.”

I’ll end with an interesting anecdote.

Over the past few years, I’ve noticed an increasing number of houses in upstate New York flying Confederate flags. Seems absurd on the face of it. Why are white New Yorkers adorning their homes with the flag flown by the Southern rebels that their ancestors fought in the Civil War? After all, you don’t see many Poles flying the Hammer and Sickle, or many Koreans paying obeisance to the emperor of Japan. Then it hit me: the U.S. has become so deracinated and so debauched that rural Northern whites are reaching for any emblem of culture that they can get their hands on, anything that they can call theirs.

To the cultural Marxists, the Confederate flag represents white America, the white America they seek to destroy and replace with foreigners, a symbol that drives them insane with hatred. To rural whites across the U.S., lambasted as the embodiment of everything wrong with the world, the Confederate flag is a gesture of defiance to those who would see them dead and buried. A symbol of implicit white identity, transcending the petty regional differences between North and South, united against the forces of globalism, multiculturalism, and degeneracy.

None of us can say for certain whether this a struggle our people will win. But I can say this: we will not lie down and die either. Regardless of how the next eight years play out, the dragon of white identity has been roused from his slumber, and he’s not going back to bed anytime soon.

As my friend the Bechtloff says, I’ve made my peace with God. Let’s dance.

Thank you.

Roosh #fundie rooshv.com

I’ve had a front-row seat in the culture war for over a decade, but I haven’t made any big policy declarations like other movements. Men’s rights activists their “family law reform” platform. The MGTOW group has “legalize prostitution and invent realistic sex bots.” The alt right has “white ethno-state.” The alt lite has “civic nationalism.” When it comes to policy, I’ve been quiet, solely focusing on fostering truth and masculinity. Only now am I ready to make the commitment to a policy platform which nips the essential problem in the bud in a way that other movements do not. We must repeal women’s suffrage, starting with the 19th Amendment in the United States. Once this is accomplished, no other planned or conscious action must be taken to solve nearly all our societal ills.

...

Today’s problems are all branches of a radical leftist root that has been normalized through feminism, social justice, and socialism. Allowing women to vote has made it effortless to elect leftist politicians who hate the family unit, men, and healthy market competition, while simultaneously weakening society by pushing women into work and giving them generous welfare in the form of handouts to single moms and the able-bodied along with make-work jobs for females in bloated government bureaucracies.

Thanks to leftism, we have seen the rise of a techno-matriarchy with an agenda of male disempowerment and persecution that transfers resources and soft power from men to women while solidifying hard power among elite globalists who control it all to uphold their own high-level aims. Individual globalists work together as an oligarchy to enact a divide-and-conquer strategy among races and sexes to fund leftist causes, politicians, and NGOs. The group with the most money to influence “democratic” politics and public opinion implants their useful idiots and political puppets to maintain control.

These puppets, whether on the “right” or “left,” have a true center on the left end of the spectrum for the sheer reason that votes from women must be gained. The manosphere cannon has shown that women have special mental faculties that operate almost exclusively on emotion, submission, and social conflict more than logic, dominance, and merit. Western countries have transformed into a national representation of the female psyche.

...

To appease female voters and their destructive nature of promiscuity and drama, a symptom of which is collectively propelling a book about a woman being brutally dominated by a man (50 Shades Of Grey) to one of the best selling books of all time, society has veered so far to the left that it is crumbling at its base through declining birth rates and collapse of the family unit. Because we have given women suffrage, it has become necessary to gain their votes by promising whatever they want in the moment, including the removal of all gates to the sexual market so they can engage in the great game of “alpha male hunting,” which has led to such unbridled chaos and sterility that we have to import third-world people as these empowered female voters abort nearly 60 million American babies. The demographic crisis the West faces today is primarily due to allowing women to do as they please instead of imposing healthy standards on their behavior and choices. The direct cause of this horror movie is giving women the vote.

I haven’t even touched the surface of the problems we have today that stem from having to appeal to the female vote: lowering of academic standards in universities to allow them to “excel,” promotion of degeneracy in media, invention of apps and technology to allow frictionless casual sex with bad boys, promotion of sex change operations among children, re-defining fat women as “beautiful at any size,” legalization of gay marriage, use of murder (abortion) as birth control, maligning normal masculinity as “toxic masculinity,” and elevation of damaging myths such as “rape culture” and the “wage gap” to foment gender fear and confusion. The culture has degraded because women have been at the forefront of degrading it. Their true nature, once unimpaired by societal limits, embarks on an tragic mission of destruction to recreate reality in a way to make them appear more attractive to high status men, no matter the consequence.

The problems I mentioned above would take thousands of local and Federal laws to address individually, and it would meet intense opposition from globalists who would fund the sort of antifascist protests and Deep State interference that we have seen thwarting Donald Trump. And even if those thousands of laws are passed, there is no guarantee that a renewed leftward push, thanks to ongoing demographic changes, wouldn’t roll them back. Is there a way to solve the problems while being assured that they couldn’t be repealed over the course of several generations? I’ve thought about this dilemma for years, after scratching the surface with previous thought experiments, and can only come to one conclusion: the problems in society can only be solved, and remain solved beyond one generation, by repealing women’s suffrage.

...

Take away the power of women to vote, and the degradation stops. The paltry population of male feminists, who are likely suffering from low testosterone due to environmental plastics, would offer no barrier in stopping the return to patriarchal normalcy. Women, helpless at enacting political change, would just whine and nag endlessly, and when they tire themselves out, they’d complete their protest by buying dildos or cats. Consider that no Democratic candidate for President since Jimmy Carter would have likely won if women were not allowed to vote. Upon repeal of women’s suffrage, a new party to the right of Republicans would be created as conservative men seek true conservatism and tradition.

Remove a woman’s right to vote and within just one national election, every single leftist party would be crushed. Within two elections, politicians would speak directly to men and their innate interest for patriarchy, economic success, stable families, and an equitable distribution of females among society. More than half of the candidates running for office would already be more conservative than Donald Trump, who is still liberal on social issues like equality and gay marriage.

Within three elections, the entirely of the liberal platform of the past 50 years would be rolled back, and the only living audience a woman can gain for her political opinions is from her feline friends. Within four elections, the global elite would be forced to retrench while sitting on billions of capital with no direct path of influence except sponsoring color revolutions and coups that can be defeated in the name of patriotic national defense. By then, the power of NGOs, media outlets, and day care universities will have declined. Within five elections, cultural standards would have tamed the sexual marketplace, and birth rates would rise once more as both women and men see the incentive in spending their free time building families instead of endlessly trying to secure a sex partner for the fleeting moment.

Repealing women’s suffrage would also diminish other dissident movements whose solutions can only bring temporary success as long as women have the right to vote. Men will automatically push laws that account for men’s rights. They will automatically regulate the sexual marketplace to make it more fair, diminishing MGTOW. They will automatically regulate immigration and replace it with a policy of natalism, diminishing the alt right. And they will automatically have high standards for citizenship, diminishing the alt lite.

Even the concept of masculinity will be built into the crust of society where only men have a political voice and not women. My game guides would no longer be needed, allowing me to buy land and operate a real farm instead of a content farm where most of my life has been spent pushing back the harmful effects that were unleashed after allowing women to vote. There will be no need for counter-cultural movements of men when those in charge of national politics only need to cater to male votes. If women’s suffrage is repealed, the most reviled dissident today would even be able to easily attain political office.

...

It should be clear to you that women will always use their votes to destroy themselves and their nations, to invite invaders with open legs, to persecute their own men, and to ravage their economies with socialism. Because they don’t operate on logic like men do, you will always have this destructive element within the political ranks of your nation as long as women have the right to vote. Giving them this right was a terrible mistake. I can now claim to have one political dream, and that is to repeal women’s suffrage. I will vote only for politicians who put me closer to realizing this necessary reality. Within my lifetime, I’m certain that at least one country, in an attempt to save itself, will elevate a barbarous and ferocious strongman to fulfill this task, and he will have my full support, because repealing women’s suffrage is the only issue of our day that can single-handedly solve all the others.

Cretus clawfinger #fundie reddit.com

Libertarians need the alt-right because the demographic changes cause by mass immigration will assure that you will permanently lose on most of your major issues. Whatever pet theory you have to why this is the case is really irrelevant...increasing 3rd world immigration will bring increasing 3rd world dysfunction into 1st world countries. Identity politics will become the only politics because the different demographic groups have no common identity or history. Like in many diverse societies, politics will become an ethnic spoils system where differing groups demand more free shit and special privileges from the government while crushing the middle and upper classes with punishing taxation until the whole system collapses. Competing groups who view each other as hostile aliens will fight for state power in zero-sum fashion while promising ever more freebies to their tribe with no regard for long-term consequences. All this will do is work to increase centralized state power exponentially and further bloat the bureaucracy, as it becomes more craven and corrupt.
Listen, the world is full of people that don't give a flying fuck about liberty as you might understand it. They just want material comfort. Many more enlightened lower class people realize that if you don't like whatever law, you just break it, it's that simple, so who gives a shit about runaway regulation? This small government, limited regulation autismo is largely a white phenomenon, that is an inherited legacy of traditional American mythology surrounding the 1776 revolution and Enlightenment thought in general, that many non-whites, immigrants especially, don't identify with and don't give one flying red fuck about. Take a look around at any Libertarian gathering and report back to me the racial makeup of the attendees. And yes, there's always exceptions, I'm talking about general trends. Problem is, democracy is winner takes all and general trends determine the outcome of your politics which determines the outcome of your society.
The drug war, however, is an exception to this. The demographically induced leftward shift (and yes, the kvetching of the libertarians) may end the drug war as we know it in a decade or two. I'm no fan of the drug war, vice is it's own punishment, but drugs are given WAY too much importance in the grand scheme of things by libertarians. They focus on the drug issue because it's easy...it's a naked example of the government persecuting peaceful people for consensual crimes. I'm on board that this is an obvious hypocritical evil, and a massive waste of resources. Still, this being your only hill to die on is ridiculous...is illegal drug use so important to the health and happiness of the average person that it warrants this much attention? Let me ask you this...if you achieved your Libertopia of all drugs totally legal, how would the life of the average illegal drug abuser (already a small subset of the population) realistically change? Yes I could by crack rocks at CVS instead of the corner hustler, woopedy fuckin doo. If you're so inclined and have a modicum of discretion, drugs are very easy to buy and use without police harassment. Well what if you're a drug dealer? Could get a hefty prison sentence. Well, drug dealers should be thanking their lucky stars for drug prohibition, because if there was no risk of incarceration, they would never be able to compete against GloboCorp Dope Distributors. Now you've just removed thousands of independent sole proprietors practicing agorism in favor of corporate oligarchy where liquor store clerks making minimum wage hawk heavily taxed tweaker fuel.
I also think that blaming inner-city dysfunction on the drug war is laughably naive. You really think that Detroit would just become a modern marvel of prosperity if it's denizens could buy black tar at Costco? Give me a fuckin break. If anything, removing one of the last viable side-hustles from a poverty stricken and embittered populace would probably have them grasp at even more anti-social methods of illicit income than drug dealing, even though battles over territory are a real problem.

This also begs the question, why are universally applicable drug laws only hurting black communities to the point that this totally defines their socio-economic plight? Do minorities just LOVE drugs that much? You're not realizing the extent to which disparities in what we might define as social pathologies follow African majority societies EVERYWHERE they exist around the globe. The richest black neighborhood in the U.S. has more violent crime than the poorest white neighborhood. There are globally evident IQ disparities amongst different races independent of income levels or socioeconomic status. Lower IQ's do highly correlate with all manner of adverse life outcomes, including the odds that you will do time in prison. To what extent this is a cultural artifact or is genetically determined is not really relevant to the outcome, but it does no one any favors to avoid the overwhelming evidence of cognitive/behavioral racial differences in favor of glib explanations for disparities that invite even sillier faux solutions. It makes you rely on vast international conspiracy theorizing and ad-hoc rationalizations as an explanatory basis for your religious-like faith that all human groups are the same in ability, potential, etc. This is an extraordinarily shaky foundation that will continue to be eviscerated by the alt-right.

CH #sexist heartiste.wordpress.com

Testosterone levels have been plummeting in Western men for at least two generations and this fact is without question. I will speculate in this post what a multigenerational, age-independent decline in T will portend for American society, should the trend not shortly reverse itself.

women will dress and act sluttier to capture the attention of increasingly benumbed men who need the services of the hardest of hardcore porn to feel aroused.
team sports will disappear.
drama club will be a required class.
politics will intensify its shift leftward because low T men will vote more like women.
the national (and psychological) borders protecting the low T men from predation will remain, for all practical purposes, open to the sewer world until, inevitably, higher T conquerors arrive in sufficient number to wipe out the low T White submissivists.
inventiveness and entrepreneurship will stagnate, and contract.
any big job or goal will demand more oversight, more paper pushing, more regulatory hurdles to overcome. the days when men gathered and made shit happen on a reasonable time frame will be over. it’ll be an HR dystopia of endless meetings all the way down to the musty cellar of the gossip mill.
corporations will turn into ghettos of bickering crones, slutty college girls, and yes-manlets. nothing will be produced but social media apps and articles about online dating. the resulting economic collapse will create a run on arable urban land as millions of useless SWPLs fight to the death for patches of communal gardens to plant their sad kale and heirloom tomatoes.
therapy and self-medication will shoot through the roof.
heart disease, cancer, and obesity will rise again (or continue the general upwards rise) among men.
the rate of infidelity will increase.
the rate of divorce will hold steady or increase (we may have hit the divorce industrial complex saturation point).
marriage will increasingly be platforms for brides to take selfies and grooms to blubber during the vows. jerkboy best men will be tasked with the job of deflowering any virgin brides remaining in the wilds as the soyfatted grooms recite lines from their favorite feminist poets.
fertility will continue declining.
the rate of cuckoldry will increase.
cat ownership will increase among men.
muscle cars will become a distant relic.
there will be vanishingly little entertainment made with a straight male sensibility in mind.
weird sexual paraphilias and fetishes will rise (those afflicted with declining libido will compensate with outlandish substitutes to bring back that lovin’ feeling).
the prevalence of sexual dysfunctions will increase.
feminism will get increasingly shrill, and male feminists increasingly servile and pathetic.
the population of basement bachelors, cat ladies and bitter spinsters will explode.
sexbots will be the only romantic companionship for half the population.
high libido men — cads — will reign supreme in the actual sexual market (what’s left of it) as opposed to the pretend sexual market that lonely feminists jabber about during their intersectionality bullshit sessions.
androgyny will become the norm.
polyandry will be common.
polygyny will be rare, but more entrenched. (the few high T men who aren’t eunuchs will have no trouble keeping de facto harems of smitten lovers satisfied and compliant)
balls, penises, jawlines, chins, noses, and musculature will literally shrink in men. ears may become floppy.
a million sociologists with shitty research papers no one has any intention of replicating will claim that beta male orbiters are our strength. they will write of the virtues of polygamy and the matriarchy, as their civilization burns down around them.
no one will ever again speak anything close to the truth about the world, about the sexes, about the races. equalist self-delusion will be taught in schools under the subject “everything but math”.
math will succumb soon afterward.
art will suck. music will suck. architecture will suck. literature will suck. this will continue a trend long evident. houellebecq may very well be our last great author.
tissue boxes will be handed out in movie theaters so that the 70-30 male-female audience may dab their eyes sitting through a full line-up of sappy rom-coms.
Mars? Uh, no. More like, the space program will be dead and the androgynes of the future will come to remember the moon landing as a myth promulgated by ancient hirsute men imprisoned in a strictly binary sexuality, who possessed a vestigial feature called a “jawline” and squinted a lot.
infrastructure will continue crumbling. instead of doing something about it, everyone will wait for the next tragedy when a bridge fails and then participate in a candlelight vigil and cry a lot. they will repeat this process until everyone is dead from preventable tragedies.
John Scalzi will be Premier of this Empire of Aromatase. His rule will not last long. Muslims, blacks, and black Muslims will overrun the Femme West and every capital will ring out with the dulcet ululations of muhammed’s flock.

Recall the Law of Gender Conservation:

?Masculinity = ?Femininity

Or, ?T = ?E, for short.

Nature abhors a testosterone vacuum. If one tribe’s men has low T, the fapuum will be filled with (in no particular order or likelihood of emergence):

invader men who have higher T
aggrocunts of man-jaw and boy-hip who have lower E (to align with the lower T of their men)
intratribe men with high T who somehow evolved an immunity against the low T disease.

Option one is genocide. Not fun.
Option two is bed death. Not fun.
Option three is our best bet for saving the West. Society will rebound as Nature, in her infinite wisdom, entrusts the low T landscape to high T spermlords who, despite feminists’ faux abhorrence to the contrary, will piledrive a wide swath through a lot of parched pussy that has spent decades lost in an anhedonic wilderness of un-men.

But if we don’t get our borders under control and stop seeding our water supply with endocrine-disrupting chemsexicals, Option Three will never have a chance to pass.

Little Bright Feather #conspiracy wnd.com

Lincoln is who began this whole OWG fiasco in his coup on DC in 1861 and REPLACED our Founders govt with his own Marxist Communist system that we have been under since !! It's because of Communist Lincoln that we have this mess ! Why do you think Lincoln has been made the worshipped "hero" in all the Communist govt schools ?!

Dave Blount #racist moonbattery.com

The Coming Non-White Majority

While we rearrange deck chairs and squabble over trivialities, the ultra-left is winning the battle that will decide the war — demographics:

For the first time in American history, non-whites will make up half or more of the next generation, likely pushing Washington toward a bigger government — and the GOP better tone down their anti-government rhetoric if they want to win them, according to a top polling outfit.

But the GOP winning isn’t the object. It is about liberty winning, and America being preserved. If Republicans adopt a socialist platform, they can win every election until Kingdom Come; liberalism will win right along with them.

At a briefing for congressional aides hosted by the moderate Republican Ripon Society, Pew Research Vice President Michael Dimock said that the trend among younger Americans is support for government programs and acceptance of Democratic Party policies.

“Their tendency is more liberal, their tendency is bigger government,” he said of so-called “millennials” born between 1979 and 1995. They will likely set the trend for the still-unnamed next generation.

Their leftward tilt isn’t only because they are still inexperienced, and haven’t had time to cast off liberal establishment brainwashing. It is because many of them are not American in the same sense as past generations.

“This is a generation that is 41 percent non-white; the generation behind it is likely to be close to 50 if not more than 50 percent non-white, and the anti-government kind of tone is one that really doesn’t resonate with that non-white sector in particular,” said Dimock at the Ripon retreat.

This isn’t about skin color. It is about the values and cultural traditions associated with groups with different backgrounds. Of course there are many individual exceptions, but on the whole, Americans of European ancestry are the only people who will choose hard liberty over easy tyranny. No other culture could have produced the US Constitution; no other culture will maintain it.

Some can be won over to traditional American culture, with its reverence for rugged independence and individual rather than group rights. But they are likely to remain a minority. The liberals who control the media and education see to that by stressing multiculturalism and the grotesque concept of racial entitlement to other people’s wealth.

People of any background can be gradually assimilated. But the rapid swamping of the country with Third-Worlders lured by extravagant government benefits has made that virtually impossible.

The appalling political consequences of whites becoming a minority in Detroit, New York City, and California are not only illustrative; they were inevitable.

Teddy Kennedy can rest easy in his grave. His Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 is working according to plan.

Brother Nathanael Kapner #fundie realjewnews.com

JEWISH DESTRUCTION OF AMERICA

HOW HAVE THE JEWS destroyed America? Let us count the ways:

- Jews Are The Main Pushers Of Homosexual Activity.

- Jews Brought In Multiple Creeds via Their Open Immigration Law of 1965.

- Jews Offshore US Jobs via Jewish Wall Street.

- Jews Have Accelerated Inflation via The Federal Reserve.

- Jews Have Created a Jewish Police State via Homeland Security.

- Jews Form Public Opinion via TOTAL Ownership of the Main Stream Media.

- Jews Blackball Christian Groups via Homeland Security.

- Jews Litigate Against Christian Symbols in the Public Square.

- Jews Celebrate Passover In The White House But Forbid Easter Services.

- Jews Control Capitol Hill via AIPAC, ADL, and Sheldon Adelson.

- Jews Manipulate Elections via Money & Media.

- Jews Corrupt The Youth via Jew-owned Hollywood and the Music Industry.

THIS IS ONLY the tip of the iceberg of the Jewish ruination of America.

Where are the leaders of yesteryear?

Men like Robert E Lee, William Howard Taft, and Louis Thomas McFadden will never be seen again. Now we're stuck with Jews, queers, and incompetent women.

Wake up America! Jews have destroyed your country!

Patrick Scrivener #conspiracy reformation.org

John D. Rockefeller was a British Secret Service agent who dominated the U.S. and world economy for over 70 years. He created the modern petroleum industry, and he is the father of the foul air polluting gasoline automobile.

The ancestor of Rockefeller was named Johann Roggenfelder and he came to the Colonies from Germany in 1722.

By 1722, Germany–the birthplace of the blessed Reformation–was already saturated with British spies.

Prussia was added to the British Empire in 1701.

When the Civil War broke out in 1861, Rockefeller was only 22 years old. Like his fellow spy J. P. Morgan, he bought a substitute for $300.00 and sent him off to get killed.

Here is a quote from an authorized biography of Rockefeller:

So why didn't Rockefeller act on his keenly felt sympathies when Lincoln appealed for 75,000 volunteers after Fort Sumter's fall in April 1861? Why did he turn a deaf ear to the torchlight rallies and street-corner recruiters swarming through Cleveland that spring? "I wanted to go in the army and do my part," Rockefeller said. "But it was simply out of the question. We were in a new business, and if I had not stayed it must have stopped—and with so many dependent on it." This last sentence hinted gingerly at what must have been the main reason behind his failure to serve: his father's desertion of the family and his own need to sustain it. Though the Union government offered no occupational exemptions from the draft, men were excused if they were the sole means of support for siblings, children, or parents. Though only twenty-two at the outbreak of the war, John D. was effectively in the position of a middle-aged father responsible for a family of six. (Chernow, Titan, p. 69).

Rockefeller had no real sympathy for the Union but he did make a fortune with a partner named Stephen V. Harkness selling WHISKEY to the Union army.

[...]

The Twin Towers were called David and Nelson Rockefeller!!

The demolition of the Twin Towers has all the earmarks of an MI6 psyop. The British secret service has over 400 years of experience in carrying out false flag operations.

The Twin Towers were called David and Nelson after the Rockefeller brothers.

They were demolished on Sept 11, 2001.

The demolition has all the earmarks of an MI6 psyop or false flag operation.

Assassination, disinformation, doubles, propaganda, false flag operations, are all part of the deadly arsenal of espionage that the British are using against the United States . . . and Russia!

The only weapon that Gog and Magog fears is the Sword of the Spirit which is the Holy Bible properly translated:

No weapon that is formed against thee shall prosper; and every tongue that shall rise against thee in judgment thou shalt condemn. This is the heritage of the servants of JEHOVAH, and their righteousness is of me, saith JEHOVAH. (Isaiah 54:17).

Andre Vltchek #conspiracy journal-neo.org

West is Losing and so It’s Bashing China and Russia ‘Left and Right’ Literally

The insanity and vileness of Western anti-Chinese propaganda used to make some of my Chinese friends cry late at night. But things are changing. The lunacy of what is said and written about China (and Russia, of course), in the US and Europe, is now clearly reflecting frustration and the bad manners of sore losers. One could almost be inclined to pity the Western empire, if only it wasn’t so violently murderous.

The Empire’s propagandists are pitying nobody – they are now shooting like maniacs, but without any coherent plan.

Various Western ‘experts’ and journalists cannot really agree on the basics: ‘what is really wrong with China’. But they are paid extremely well to find new and newer skeletons in the huge Chinese closets, and so they are constantly competing with each other, looking for the juiciest and the most scandalous stories. Often it appears that it pays to assume that absolutely everything is flawed with the most populous, and on top of it, Communist (with the ‘Chinese characteristics, of course) country on earth!

China will end extreme poverty by 2020, but do not look for cheers and applause from Berlin, Paris, London and Washington. China is far ahead of all the large countries on earth in building a so-called ‘ecological civilization’, but who is willing to notice? China is constructing public parks, boardwalks and playgrounds, the biggest on earth, but who cares? The Chinese government is introducing sweeping educational reforms, while flooding the entire nation with concert halls, museums and theatres. But that’s not worth mentioning, obviously!

Western propaganda tries to discredit China literally from both ‘left and right’, sometimes accusing it for being too Communist, but when it is suitable, even for ‘not being Communist enough’.

The New York Times ran a cover-page story on October 5, 2018, “Unlikely foe for China’s leaders: Marxists”. For this highly sarcastic piece, a reporter visited the Chinese city of Huizhou, from where he wrote about a group of over-zealous young Marxists who are demanding things to be as they were in Mao’s days:

“But the Huizhou activists represent a threat the authorities did not expect.”

Seriously? A threat? China is moving towards Communism, again, under the current leadership. We are talking about democratic, socially-oriented Communism. But let us not argue with the official U.S. newspaper. It is definitely not a pro-Communist publication, but they had to show some sympathy (by running a cover story!) to a small bunch of over-zealous ‘opposition’ Marxists, just to spread doubts among the readers, suggesting that the Chinese government is not that Red, anymore.

The next day (Saturday-Sunday edition, October 6-7, 2018), the same New York Times published two cover stories on China. One was along its usual anti- Chinese and anti-Russian conspiracy lines “Will China hack U.S. mid-terms?”, but the other basically contradicted the story from the previous day, accusing Beijing this time of cutting the wings of private companies: “Beijing is pushing back into business”, with a sub-title:

“Government flexes muscle as private companies that built economy lose ground.”

‘Wherever it can hurt China, just write it’, could be the credo of thousands of European and North American journos: ‘as long as the news about or from China is bad, really dark and negative, anything goes!’

Too much Communism, or too little… As far as the West is concerned – China can never get it right! Because… simply because it is China, because it is Asia, and because it waves the red flags.

And so, The New York Times ran two totally contradictory stories. An editorial blunder, or a pre-meditated attempt to inflict maximum damage, by kicking ‘left and right’?

*

It is, of course, fun, to follow this propaganda trend, ‘from a safe distance’ (meaning: ‘not believing a word of what it says’). But what is happening is not a joke; what is being done can actually be deadly. It can trigger, unexpectedly, a chain of events that could truly hurt China.

‘An explosion’ could originate in Taiwan, in Southeast Asia, or from the PRC territory itself.

Look at Brazil, look at Venezuela! Look at all those Color Revolutions, Umbrella Revolutions, ‘Springs’ from Europe to Arab countries. And look at China itself: who triggered; who sponsored the so-called Tiananmen Square events? There is clearly enough evidence, by now, that it was not some spontaneous student rebellion.

The West has convinced several countries such as the Philippines, that they should confront China, through various territorial claims in which, honestly, almost no serious Filipino historian or political scientist is ready to believe (unless he or she paid royally from abroad). I talked directly to several top historians and political scientists in Manila, and I got a clear picture of whom and what is behind those territorial claims. I wrote about it in the past, and soon will again.

China is too big to tolerate dangerous subversions from abroad. Its leadership knows well: when the country is in disarray, hundreds of millions of human beings suffer. To preserve the nation’s territorial integrity is essential.

*

So, what is China really; in a summary?

It is a Communist (or you may call it a socialist) country with thousands of years of a great and comparatively egalitarian history. It has a mixed economy but with central planning (government tells the companies what to do, not vice-versa). It is clearly the most successful nation on earth when it comes to working on behalf of, and for the benefit of its citizens. It is also the most peaceful large nation on earth. And here are two more essential points: China is at the forefront of saving the world from the looming ecological disaster. And it has no colonies, or ‘neo’-colonies, being essentially an ‘internationalist’ state.

Its political system, economy, culture: all are diametrically different from those in the West.

China has millions of things to say about how this planet should be governed, how it should be marching forward, and what is true democracy (rule of the people).

Now honestly: does Western mainstream, which manufactures ‘public opinion’ all over the world, allows many Chinese (PRC) patriots, Communists, thinkers, to appear on television screens, or to write op-eds?

We know the answer. Almost exclusively, it is the Westerners who are, (by the Western rulers), entrusted with the tremendous task of ‘defining what China is or isn’t’. And what the entire world is or isn’t.

If China says that it is ‘socialist with Chinese characteristics’, they say ‘No!’ with their perfect Oxford accents. And their arrogance from telling the greatest civilization on earth what it actually is or isn’t, gets accepted because of the fact that most of them are white, and they speak perfect English (paradoxically, still a seal of trustworthiness, at least in certain circles).

The West never hears what the Chinese or Russians think about the world. While the Chinese and Russians are literally bombarded by what the West thinks about them.

Even Chinese people used to listen to such ‘false prophets’ from the ‘civilized West’. Now they know better. Same as the Russians know better. Same as many in Latin America know better.

The spread of Western propaganda and dogmas used to appear as a battle, an ideological combat, for Chinese and Russian brains (if not for hearts). Or at least it appeared as such, to many naïve, trusting people.

Now it is all much simpler and ‘in the open’: the battle continues, but the frontlines and goals have shifted. How?

What is taking place these days, is simply an enormous clash between Western imperialism plus its propaganda, versus the determination of the Chinese and Russian people to live their own lives the way they choose. Or to put it into even simpler terms: the battle is raging between Western imperialism on one side, and democracy with ‘Chinese and Russian characteristics’ on the other.

West is bashing China and Russia ‘left and right’, literally. But it is definitely not winning!

Patrick Scrivener #fundie reformation.org

Will your END be Christian burial or pagan Druid cremation? The Holy Bible guarantees that everybody is going to die, except for a very, very small number who will still be alive when Christ returns. All the people alive today are just ONE HEARTBEAT from eternity . . . or the end of their world!

[...]

Christian burial prevailed in Great Britain until the beginning of the 20th century. The door was opened to Druid cremation by another deadly Druid named Charles Darwin. Darwin said that man was just an evolved beast . . . so why bother with burial . . . and just burn him like an animal when he dies.

[...]

MI6 Jessica Mitford opened the door to Druid cremation in the U.S.

Except for a very small minority, pagan Druid cremation was never accepted in the United States until the beginning of the ecumenical movement. Before Vatican II, cremation was actually forbidden to Latin Church members.

[...]

The U.S. has over 1,800 crematoriums!!

In the dogmatic Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, modern civilization is completely condemned:

#80. The Roman Pontiff can, and ought to, reconcile himself, and come to terms with progress, liberalism and modern civilization.—Allocution "Jamdudum cernimus," March 18, 1861. (Condemned as error).

Modern crematoriums are one of the major exceptions to this rule. In the past, when Christians were publicly burned alive at the stake, it just produced more martyrs, as the people saw the cruelty and hypocrisy of the hierarchy.

Before Vatican Council II, only 2% of the U.S. population were cremated. After the publication of Jessica Mitford's book, the numbers soared. When most of the Latin Church monasteries closed, it looks like the monks found new occupations as undertakers!!

The largest number of death ovens are located in California and Florida.

Before Vatican Council II cremation was very, very rare in the U.S.

Now over 1,800 of these FINAL SOLUTION crematoriums exist, with the largest number located in California and Florida.

With all the advances in technology, cremating a body is still a slow process. Patents have been granted for mobile cremators that can pull up to your house and save you the trouble of a trip to the crematorium!!

It is beyond belief that "Jews" in the U.S. are not sounding the alarm night and day about these FINAL SOLUTION ovens.

This is even more bizarre because there is a Holocaust Museum in Washington City, and Houston, Texas!!

Why don't we find groups of concerned citizens picketing these crematoriums as they do abortion clinics? After all, abortion clinic babies are also cremated. This is all the more astonishing as the largest number of "Jews" in the world live in the United States.