Similar posts

3 Anonymous Cowards #sexist godlikeproductions.com

[Note: Three separate posts, bolding in originals]

List of female PR phrases

I don't wear make up for men I wear it for myself
Translation: I wear makeup to increase my sexual market value and get attention from men but I don't want to admit I'm superficial.

It's not easy to just leave an abusive relationship
Translation: I didn't want to leave him because he was such a chad but now I also want sympathy and attention from you simps.

personality and confidence are most important
Translation: A strong jaw and hunter eyes are most important.

You're not that ugly. Some girl out there will be lucky to have you
Translation: Don't even thinking about dating me or my friends you ugly subhuman, get the fuck away from me.

I like a man with passions and goals
Translation: I like a man who has a lot of money or going to make a lot of money and wagecucks for me.

I'm not even attracted to chad
Translation: I would lick chad's asshole but I'm sub 5 so he probably won't let me anyway.

I have depression
Translation: chad hasn't texted me back

---

Oh he's just a friend
Translation: He is the back up I keep here in case I want to cheat on you or leave you

The first thing we notice about you is your shoes.
Translation: The first thing we notice about you is your height and face.

I'm not looking for a relationship right now.
Translation: I just want to friendzone you and have you around for emotional support while I look for Chad dick to suck.

---

You're a creep
Translation: You're ugly and I think you're interested in me. Fat chance.

You're so disrespectful
Translation: You're disrespectful of my prescense because you're ugly

I want to rescue him
Translation: He's a POS but idk because he's chad

I want someone to sweep me off my feet
Translation: Not only do I demand chad but I also demand he be a stellar human being

You don't understand what its like being a woman
Translation: My life is hard because only Brad agreed to fuck me today, not Chad

You're such a nice guy.
Translation: You're ugly. Fuck off.

You're so quiet.
Translation: You're ugly. Fuck off.

You'd be perfect for another girl.
Translation: You're ugly. Bother someone else.

You treat me so much better than Chad.
Translation: Please continue lavishing me in validation while I fuck n' suck an actual human being.

Improve yourself.
Translation: Slave your life away so you can't even think about anything else than being a reliable betabux provider.

NO FUCKBOYS
Translation: Looking for fuckboys (i.e, Chad)

Napoleon de Geso #sexist #psycho incels.co

Unmarried females must be property of state, not of fathers

Fuck all traditionalists who say fathers must be in control of daughters. Absolute majority of fathers are uncultured morons, who just jealously guard daughters, especially when younger, because want to fuck them by themselves, or want to give to rich men only, not poor but nice. In that way poor, but cultured men with good intentions are discriminated by degenerate overprotective daddies. For solving that, girl must be property of state, and financially supported by state, and living with father only for not becoming crazy whore with daddy issues. Thats role of father, just to be company, but not to have say final word. And so when girl has first mesntruation, she has legal right, protected by state, to date any man, except excluded ones (chads, fuckboys, criminals), and daddy has no word to say no, "my house my rules", or "I'm you master while paying for your shit". State is paying, master is her bf, and rights of her ownership is shifting towards him, like you him or not. And so man doesnt need be working hard at very start, to being able to financially support waifu, because given period of transition, when she is still supported by state, she can even live in fathers house, but he has no right to interrupt her dating with future husband. Thats how state must help broken men to recover, but slowly, without shock

Thats be problematic to achieve, girls are still stupid in most to choose right man, even if chad and other scum forbidden, those of state officers, responsible of approving and protecting girl's relations, also can be not enough of culture required, but atleast threat of overprotective daddies be eliminated, let they burn in hell, theres special place for them

Napoleon de Geso #sexist #psycho incels.co

[Serious] Femoids need serious animal training

Training goes like this: femoids are tied up to chairs with sensors and electroed attached, and shown pictures of men. And when men are nice guy looking - beautifull music plays, and pleasant aromas spreads in room. When shown pictures of fuckboys - unpleasant sounds and smells. And when pictures of chads - femoids get electroshock, if sensors register sexual arousal

Those animals need to be trained

LOLI BREEDING (aka Napoleon de Geso) #pedo #psycho incels.co

How to deal with low IQ parents of loli who don't want mature man but rather fuckboy?

Very big problem, even if I somehow convince loli to cuddle and creampie(after 4.5 months coronavirus ends, can only ldar and looksmax now :feelsUnreal:) that still leaves daddy and mommy who are obviously normie npcs and will only want partner for loli as mainstream media dictates: teen fuckboy to have fun with and later betabux. Can't get cucked because of overprotective parents if I ever manage to ascend, I'd probably rope right then and there :feelsrope:
thoughts?

platinumgoldstarlesbians #sexist platinumgoldstarlesbians.tumblr.com

(Just out of curiosity, why do you feel the need to differentiate between lesbians and gold star lesbians? Why does it make you so angry that women who have had sex with men have the same right as a "gold star" like you to identify as a lesbian? Is it a superiority thing? Do you think you're better than those women? I really want to know why you put so much energy into something as trivial as this. )

First of all, it is not a trivial thing. Maybe to you non gold stars but to most gold star lesbians it is not trivial. Gold Star lesbian means a lesbian who has never willingly slept with a man or boy. Where in the definition does it say that gold star lesbians think they are superior to other lesbians? Rape victims can be gold stars lesbians because it implies consensual sex not rape. The term gold star used to be a slur. “Lesbians” who had or are sleeping with men made fun of and insulted lesbians who have never and will never sleep with men willingly by saying something like this, “oh, so you have never slept with a man? So now what do you want? A gold star!?” So these lesbians eventually got sick of it and decided to reclaim the word for themselves thus the gold star lesbian. The “lesbians” and their supporters who made fun of them and future supporters who will hate the term and/or definition of the term or/and the actual gold star lesbians are forever pissed of and will do anything to silence us and make us look bad. I think it was never about the term, it was and is about the definition of the term because they are other offensive terms such as pillow princess and dyke and slut that no one is making a fuss over and even if they do people ignore it. I think these people who are antigold stars just can’t stand and comprehend how a woman has not and will not willingly have sex with men and they are pissed of because they and everyone expect every woman to sleep with a man at least once in her lifetime. I view antigold stars to be mysoginistic and homophobic. I care because it puts a really bad reputation on real lesbians. Gold star lesbians have face the same compulsory heterosexuality just like the “lesbians” who have slept with men. There is only one type of lesbian and it is a biological woman who is sexually, emotionally, romantically, and physically attracted to ONLY other biological women. By that definition lesbians don’t willingly have sex with men. Also, they are many ways to avoid having sex with men when you are faced with expectations to sleep with them unless you live in a country like Afghanistan where who are basically raped and force to do things. The only excuse that I hear of why a “lesbian” slept with a man willingly is because compulsorary heterosexuality but there excuse is not valid because gold star lesbians face the same challenges as they do. Actually they have more of a challenge and are at more of a risk because they have never and will never sleep with men willingly and society expects women to have sex with men. Gold Star lesbians are not “lucky” they are just following their lesbianism. These “lesbians” who have slept and/or are sleeping with men make lesbians a huge joke to the mayority, the straight people. Those “lesbians” reinforce the stereotype that lesbians can have sex with men willingly, it is just a phase, they will end up with men, they can be “turn”, etc. The word lesbian has been changed (not by the dictionary but by what people connote it to) to mean a woman who had sex with men but now has sex with women. I don’t even like to call myself lesbian because people especially the LGBTQ will assume that I have slept with men which is not true. So I call myself gold star lesbian and this clearly states that I have never and will never sleep with men. The term lesbian has been changed to be ambiguous meaning that it can mean anything even the bisexuals claim the word lesbians. The point is to distinguish the “lesbians” who had and/or have sex with men from the lesbians who has never and will never willingly sleep with a man. After all, who do you think a person who wants to learn about lesbians will take more seriously, a “lesbian” who has slept or/and is sleeping with men or a lesbian who has never and will never sleep with men? I care because you antigold star lesbians are silencing us and expect us to be viewed as manfuckers like every other “lesbian”. It is just a term and because antigold stars are making a huge fuss over it I assume you all are homophobic. Plus, why do the “lesbians” who have had sex with men get a voice while lesbians who never slept with men need to shut the fuck up by the antigold star lesbians? It is antigold stars who make a huge fuss about the term and put bullshit lies in our mouths such as we don’t let rape victims be gold stars (most gold stars would agree that they can be gold stars). We gold stars are just defending ourselves from your homophobic bullshit.

(Hi, so there are many issues with your argument:

1) I think it’s funny how you assumed that I am a “non gold star” lesbian just because I have a problem with your perspective. To use your language, I am in fact a “platinum gold star” lesbian. My current girlfriend was my first kiss :)

2) The term “gold star” lesbian is not a slur. The response “oh, so you have never slept with a man? So now what do you want? A gold star!?” probably came after your insufferable and needless bragging about never having been with a “biological male”, which by the way, is transphobic. I’m not surprised that you’re a terf. A sarcastic comeback is not the same as a slur. The term “dyke” is used when I’m being threatened from across the street by a group of men for holding my girlfriend’s hand. No one cares if I’m a gold star or not.

3) You assume IMMENSE amounts of privilege when talking about being a gold star lesbian. I come from a country where there was absolutely NO LGBT representation. On top of that, my family was very religious and conservative. Heterosexual sex wasn’t even discussed or represented without religious warnings and limitations, i.e. only when you’re married, etc. I have had feelings for women for as long as I could remember, but due to my young inability to comprehend what I was feeling, I continued to identify as straight. After all, I had no point of reference, so how could I identify as something I didn’t even know was an option? You don’t have to be in Afghanistan being murdered or raped to deal with compulsory heterosexuality. If I had remained in my country, I would have probably ended up in a casually arranged marriage courtesy of my parents, distant relatives, and family friends. I know for a fact that I would also have just accepted and went along with the marriage, as I would have wanted to please my family. It would have probably been a close childhood friend of mine and we could just continue to be best friends after the marriage, just with occasional sex thrown in. Would I have been enthusiastic about the sex? Maybe not, but since I would have had no point of reference, chances are that I would have just went along with it to please my husband. No big deal, right? Except that in this scenario, I’m gay and I just don’t know it.

P.S. this situation isn’t completely hypothetical, I know a few of my parents’ friends that had me lined up as an option for their sons.

What I’m trying to show you is that there is nuance to being a lesbian. Nothing is just black and white. A lesbian is a woman (cis or trans) that is attracted solely to women. Therefore, I am a lesbian, just as much as my girlfriend, @tinylesbian, who has been involved with men for means of safety and survival.

4) The differentiation of platinum/gold star lesbians vs lesbians who have been involved with men in the past creates a hierarchy and is not helpful nor conducive to a supportive lesbian community. Bragging about never having been with a “biological male” (still transphobic) should not be a point of pride as it insinuates that you are somehow more of a lesbian than women who have and honestly, it’s just unnecessary information. We don’t care. No one does.)

There are gold stars and platinum lesbians who disagree with the label and I know that but most of them that complain about the label are the ones who sleep or have slept with men. Personally, I don’t like the term because it implies something better but no one including the haters have tried to come up with a new neutral term. Transexuals can’t be lesbians because I follow science. I suppose I am a TERF but I don’t call myself that because I find it offensive. The term may not have been a slur but it obviously was used to offend the gold star lesbians. I do agree that Afghanistan is not the only place that you can get raped and murdered for being LGBTQ. Unfortunately, even the U.S. has problems with murder and rape. However, as a society you can get help if you are raped and the rapist will get punished if he or she is reported but unfortunately some countries don’t have that. I in fact am a platinum lesbian. Despite that I had tried to be straight and tried to like boys in my teenaged years but it didn’t work and never got a boyfriend or any fuckboys coming after me (probably because of my social issues). Plus, I just couldn’t bring myself to have sex with males because to me it felt like I was going to sleep with an animal. It just wasn’t for me and my extincts just said no. I also tried commiting suicide a couple of times. But just because I am a platinum lesbian doesnt means that I had an easy life and that I and other gold star and platinum lesbians should be ignored and silenced. Most of us gold star and platinum lesbians have not had an easy life and we didn’t go have sex with men to make it easier and plus it is not in our nature. I totally disagree that lesbianism is nuanced. If lesbianism is nuanced, what about straight people are they nuanced and not black and white? The lesbian community is a huge joke (at least the ones I have been to) and it is not because of gold star and platinum lesbians. It is because of “lesbians” and bisexuals who can’t shut the hell up about men whether how it was good or bad having sex with them, how to unlearn liking men, divorces, marriages, children with men, etc. I expected a community of lesbians who talked only about women and not a thing about men (relating to sexual or romantic). Plus, the hate and bullying towards and silencing of lesbians who have never slept with men by the antigold stars and antiplatinums is unbelievable. Sometimes they even ban you from the place if you have never slept with men. I don’t involve myself in the lesbian community or LGBTQ community anymore and only seek other gold star or platinum lesbians to date. You and only people with your mentality may not care about the term but why the hell do you and others think you have the right to tell us what we can and cannot call ourselves and judge us when they are many bisexuals who mislabel themselves as lesbians and make a joke out of us? One of the reasons why we are loud and vocal is because people like you want to silence us and most people don’t want to be silenced. Also, we want to be role models to young lesbians to show them that they don’t have to sleep with a men to make sure they are lesbians or to be proper lesbians. I will respect your opinions despite that I disagree with them and I hope you respect mine despite you disagreeing with me. And then we call it quits.

Illustrious_Try #fundie reddit.com

Re: Sex Before Kissing: How 15-Year-Old Girls Are Dealing With Porn-Obsessed Boys

Fascinating. I didn't know the US had already degenerated to this level although I suspected something along these lines.

15 year old girls should be kept seperate from boys their age or at least supervised. At that age boys have levels of testosterone exceeding even that of violent adult males. I recall thinking about sex or something sex-related almost all the time when I was that age. It faded as puberty ended of course, but pubescent males are basically drugged up on a powerful aphrodisiac drug that also makes them aggressive and impulsive.

The media and liberalism have made it normal for 15 year olds to have sex. The truth is that as much as the hormones tell them to have sex at that age, they're just not mentally and emotionally ready for it.

I don't know about full segregation, but we at least need to be talking about this on a societal level, in comprehensive sex ed classes, etc... & parents are going to have to get over their squeamishness over talking about sex with their kids. As for the last part, I am grateful that I was strong willed & had strong boundaries at 15, because I ended up hearing too many cautionary tales that involved girls who didn't.

At that age boys want to have sex with anything female that moves. Liberalism has normalised sex for all ages to such a degree that it's now bordering on pedophilia.

These days when a teacher has sex with a student it's not even seen as wrong anymore. It's called a sex romp these days. Even when the kid later comes out and feels seduced and abused, the media will often still speak of it as a sex romp instead of rape. The media has created this sense that rules are meant to be broken, that no means yes if you try hard enough and that 'bad boys' are real men.

Too many women put up with it though. These boys become fuckboys in adulthood and consider relationship gatekeeping as a tool to get women to have sex with them. They don't see women as persons proper, just as delectable creatures with warm, soft and moist holes for them to stick their penises in. It was bound to happen at some point though I mean women are objectified just about all the time. I wonder if women are aware of it.

For example I'm sure a bikini is nice to wear but it's effectively the same as being naked, Almost everything of interest is already on display if women wear it, so any time a man wants to ogle women who are stripped almost bare, he can just go to the beach and have his fill.

While there is definitely a faction of pedos trying to normalize their behavior, I really am not convinced that 'liberalism' is wholly to blame for this- people practice child marriage in many of the most socially conservative societies on earth. Even here in the US, FLDS(a breakaway sect of Mormonism) members practice child marriage, & I myself met several girls under 16 who were married off, legally(with 'parental consent'), to much older men in fundamentalist evangelical christian communities. I am not convinced that any of those marriages turned out well. I can't remember who said it, but there was some quote to the effect that many right wing guys consider women private property, but left wing guys consider women public property. I wish what I have observed in my own life convinced me otherwise, but it doesn't.

I don't believe that all men engage in this or are responsible for it, but then they don't really have to- one of the greatest myths is that it takes a majority to influence social trends or societal expectations. As for swimwear/beachwear, my own choices just aren't centered around men's preferences at all- I don't care for hot, crowded beaches, so I'm usually in swimwear either because I'm going for a relaxing swim, or I'm doing some other sort of activity. Neither bikinis, nor the 'burkinis' that are positioned opposite them are actually optimal for any of the activities I like to do...trying to swim, dive, or stay on a board while I'm having to worry about a boob popping out, or dealing with so much extra fabric I might as well be wearing a beekeeper costume doesn't appeal to me. If I wanted to wear lingerie, I would wear lingerie, & I wouldn't be trying to swim in it.

I'm a nihilist and marxist. I'm not coming from the religious angle here (although most men who blame liberalism are so I understand why you would assume that). I'm not trying to say what came before wasn't extremely bad. I mentioned liberalism because as an ideology it's just bad on almost all fronts. I'm anti totalitarian but do believe in a little bit of authoritarianism/illiberalism when needed. Of course I believe in limits to such authoritarianism, I'm of the opinion that some rights are sacred, including right to bodily integrity, as well as the sovereignty of the self, and should be beyond legislation.

Left wing guys who think women are public property are just crazed tankies. Mao used to force people to do everything communally, including take showers together, sleep (not have sex, just sleep) in same room.

There's this thing called dialectical materialism. Some ideas come from the material realm, that is to say the ideas are thought up to justify the material conditions. Right wingers and left wing traitors will come up with ideas to justify the oppression of certain groups, just like how the rich like to claim the poor are lazy and that they are the parasites of society, etc.

Berniebros and common leftists don't even know what marxism is and have never read Das Kapital let alone excerpts of it. Marx says that society is divided into classes. There are the owner classes and then there are the proletariat classes, or simply the proletariat. These workers are exploited and forced to sell their labour as well as their body in certain conditions, to survive.

In a sense, men women and children alike are objectified. Men and children were worked in mines, used like disposable tools and were discarded of when their bodies were destroyed or outlived their usefulness. Women same thing, but also exploited in sexual manner. Men were sent to war like living meat bags to be shot up and bleed to death and die a few years later of PTSD if they survived.

Marx, meant not just labour but oppression as a class. That's why he makes it so very clear that there are the oppressed classes and the capitalist owner class doing the oppression.

Berniebros and so forth don't know anything about Marx, they just want a bailout for their student loans and useless college degrees. (I do think student loan debt has to be restructured though because it's abundantly clear that it's set up as a slavery ring)

sunsettommy #fundie freeconservatives.com

Markus666 loves to blather that he will only read from "peer reviewed" papers.It is just a narrowminded mindset I keep trying to point out.Just as he clearly dislikes "skeptics".He is hostile to anyone who does not belong to some "Ivy league" science club.It is pathetic to meet someone who is this bad.

reneekat777 #fundie forums.meez.com

1. People all over the U.S. Are being sent to prison for murdering the woman AND the unborn child. Look it up.
2. If you don't want a baby don't have sex. There are plenty of ways the pleasure yourself without the rick of pregnancy.
3. Coming from a family filled with rape victims I think that I know a little about what we go thru more than most. An unborn child has right too. I am thinking about what is best for everyone. Not just myself.
4. If you had done the research then you would know the statistics... Before just picking a side that would be best for you look into it... It does make a difference! It has a horrid affect on some woman! If you take meds that warn against suicide then shouldn't you know that the emotional toll of an abortion could result in the same?
5. Babies are born everyday pre mature. You never know if a child will live or die. Many states allow for abortions further than 12 weeks... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_kEth8pow9I Here is some of the research you should start up. Not trying to tell you what to think but you really should try and look into everything before you tell someone else that abortion is ok.
6. Forgive me for insinuating that young girls are mainly the ones getting the abortions. That isn't what I meant. Woman of ALL ages get abortions. Woman of all ages can have emotional damage after getting an abortion. Age doesn't seem to matter. Sorry for the misunderstanding.
7. Well. You don't spend much time with girls/woman that find out they are preggers do ya!? Cause most girls/woman I know PERSONALY that have an unplanned pregnancy go with abortion as if it is the ONLY option. Why? Because they are scared or just don't have time in their life to have a baby. They don't consider anything else... That's what people do today. When something isn't going to work for them or a loved one they find the quickest way out. That is how we have been raised. Life is all about me and what is going to get me futher in life. Sometimes tho it isn't the best option for EVERYONE.
Adoption is a very good "way out" that people fail to think of.
I have had a bad ecperence with pregnancy but went thru it anyway. I am still living. Some don't come out so lucky... But some of those that die didn't even have a complicated pregnancy in the first place. It came without warning. Just like the people that go to work or school and get in a car accident or some freak thing happened. You never know when you are going to die. But you shouldn't have the choice to take anothers life because you aren't ready to be a mom, or someone hurt you, or whatever your reason. I don't see ow anyone can justify being so selfish. But that's my opinion. You can be rude all you want... But it makes you seem childish.

CrackPr0n-EET- #fundie archive.forums.megatokyo.com

Oh god....
I can´t believe that some guys here are really saying they would date 13yo girls, even if they are 5 or more years older!

You sick pedophiles!

I can't believe your so fucking narrowminded that you think all 13 yo(the majority are, but not all) are too immature to be in a relationship.

How am I a pedophile if I look at the person as an individual? Not based on age, or appearance, but the person. Who says I'm going to have sex with them?

Senor:you're a fucking idiot. So I meet a 13 yr. old girl, that is totally compatible with me, and she's incredibly smart, and mature for her age. That makes me a pedophile automatically just because i'm an "adult"? Holy fucking shit.

You're a fucking idiot. So to you, it doesn't matter how intelligent or compatible she is, the fact that I like her automatically makes me a pedophile.

God, how narrow fucking minded. You're one of those idiot extreme conservatives aren't you? Despite me not looking for young girls, or even caring about them, I just happen to meet an amazing 13 yr. old girl, and that makes me a pedophile.

Grow the fuck up, and realize the world isn't a cookie cutter ideal. Everyone is different, and everything happens almost randomly. If you can't understand that, then shit... I hope the world fucks you over.

scoutsout1 #fundie forums.military.com

If you have to think in literal terms vs spiritual you will miss the boat completly; the Bible is written correctly, less minor translation mistakes, that useually are corrected or debated by man; I personaly, know of none that have been proven to be 100% out there and false, even the 4 legged flying insect is possible (many species of animal life whent extinct leaving the door open), regardless of the deffenition of insect, which came much later than when the Bible was actually written.

Damian #fundie theresistancemanifesto.com

I don't care if they marry, as long as they don't adopt kids, or show their discusting nature in public. I'm tired of the gay brainwash everywhere I go. That's my stance on that issue.
As for me dying for the cause, well, I am an obsolete man, I have no visible future, perfect cannon folder. A smart man traped in a warped world of brainwashed people who oppose my progress. Death would be a liberator. At least I will die fighting.
And yes, everyone should have good rights, but you also have to take some issues into consideration. I personaly am opposed to lesbians owning dildoes, they made their choice.

Carmen #fundie moonbattery.com

Death: the number one aphrodisiac for the soulless deviant.

Genocide / eugenics is a plank of “socialism”, as is butt sex, pedophilia, baby butchering and love of muzzies. Remember, the muzzies renamed Persia Iran (Aryan) for Hitler, as a warm and fuzzy thank you for killing 6-mil jews.

Murdering birds of a feather…… anyone up for more Mao ornaments on the WH satanic tree this year? Dead millions – yummers – let’s CELEBRATE!!

Since unborn humans are not REAL, why don’t the lefties make lamp shades out of them? Why hide the corpses??? ENLIGHTEN US.

Abiding Hope #fundie rr-bb.com

Personaly, I don't call them "Gay" if it can be helped. They are NOT happy people! They are queer! Something that is NOT NATURAL! I mean, my goodness, the queers that I know can't even get clean! They take 3-4 showers a day because they feel dirty ALL THE TIME! I wonder why?! Duh! Their souls are filthy! No wonder God called them an abomination! America as we have known it is gone..., a lost cause! It makes me sick to think of it.


Ok Getting off my soapbox now! This whole thing just makes me sick! Sorry for the rant. But GRRRRR!

Golden #sexist incels.co

[It's Over] Cuckoldry is getting more common in my country at a frightening rate

I remember that about 5-6 years ago or so, if a woman in a relationship were to hang out with a male friend often, she'd be shamed, such actions most certainly were not welcomed. 5 years of western social media influence later, and now "letting your girlfriend sleep with her best friend" is completely normal, sexual degeneracy is the epitome of civilization, and if you disagree, you are a narrowminded islamist bigot
I reckon in another 5 years, married women will start whoring around freely, claiming that they are expressing themselves, even now I see some cucks saying that their girlfriends sleeping around is fine as long as there's no emotional connection. Future is dark for us, all of us

values are fading away everywhere, even here in north africa and other muslim lands, the fact that degeneracy is getting worst in countries like ours is the ultimate prove of the decline of civilization and values.

It's only going to get worse

Where do you live? Even in America, actual cucking is looked down upon by most people.

Turkey, and actual cucking is looked down upon here aswell, but we are slowly getting there

Things will change and we'll go back to slut shaming whores again after more men get blackpilled.

I wholeheartedly hope so

If she’s got a “guy friend” and already has a boyfriend it was already over tbh.

Majority of the girls of my generation are like that

I just realized that the two guys with the most posts on this forum are both from turkey. Does this make u feel proud?

Not proud, it makes me feel hopeless, jfl at us, we are the incel central of the world

Letting your girlfriend sleep with her beat friend would be considered insane in the UK and I’m pretty sure our state is worse than Turkey, are you sure you’re not just taking cherrypicked articles to be the norm?

I didn't mean sleeping as in sexual intercourse, but sleeping on the same bed with a male friend, they claim that sleeping with one another doesn't have to be sexual

Acanthus #fundie gaiaonline.com

i hate it when stupid kids decide to be atheist, what the f*ck could have happened to you in your life so far that you think god does not exist..what did daddy not give you the right christmas present? You're 14 unless you have personaly experienced some serious shit or have searched for god and not found anything who the hell are you to call yourself that.....pffffft stupid teenagers and their damn idiotic tags and labels.

(no name given) #conspiracy infiniteunknown.net

(Claims these are quotes from Henry Kissinger)

Henry Kissinger Quotes On Depopulation And …(Headline abruptly ends)


STATE DEPARTMENT SPECIAL ENVOY
HENRY KISSINGER

BILDERBERG GROUP
TRILATERAL COMMISSION
COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS

“Depopulation should be the highest priority of foreign policy towards the third world, because the US economy will require large and increasing amounts of minerals from abroad, especially from less developed countries”.
– Henry Kissinger

“World population needs to be decreased by 50%”.
– Henry Kissinger

“Power is the ultimate aphrodisiac,” and “The elderly are useless eaters”.
– Henry Kissinger

"Control oil and you control nations; control food and you control the people." -- Henry Kissinger

“Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government”.
– Henry Kissinger, Bilderberger Conference, Evians, France, 1991

“What we in America call terrorists are really groups of people that reject the international system.”
- Henry Kissinger 2007

“(Soldiers are) dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns for foreign policy”.
(as quoted in Woodward and Bernstein’s “The Final Days”, ch. 14)
- Henry Kissinger

"It's not a matter of what is truer that counts but a matter opf what is perceived to be true - Henry Kissinger

“NAFTA is a major stepping stone to the New World Order”.
- Henry Kissinger

“My country’s history, Mr. President, tells us that it is possible to fashion unity while cherishing diversity, that common action is possible despite the variety of races, interests, and beliefs we see here in this chamber. Progress and peace and justice are attainable. So we say to all peoples and governments: Let us fashion together a new world order.”
- Henry Kissinger, in address before the General Assembly of the United Nations, October 1975)

“Who controls money controls the world”.
- Henry Kissinger


“The emigration of Jews from the Soviet Union is not an objective of American foreign policy’, The New York Times on Saturday quotes Kissinger as saying on the tapes to President Nixon. ‘And if they put Jews into gas chambers in the Soviet Union, it is not an American concern. Maybe a humanitarian concern”.
- Henry Kissinger

Dakota_Cowboy #wingnut freeconservatives.com

[Responding to story in which a student secretly records his geography teacher making anti-Bush comments in class]

He said that democracies don't go to war. He misquoted it unpurpose. Democracies don't go to war with EACH OTHER, is the correct statement. This guy is a hateful socialist who's brainwashing our kids. He said so much that I would have reacted to personaly by seeing him kicked out of the state, I ache! Isn't he supposed to be a Geography teacher??? Where did he teach Geography in that rant? This guy should be branded a traitor and burned at the stake.

baileysmom #fundie rr-bb.com

This is disgusting. My opinion is not popular but I personaly do not think ANY homosexual man or lesbian or transgendered crossdresser should be given a teaching job or ANY job in a school or anywhere else around children. Some of us cannot afford to home school or send our kids to Christian schools even though home schooling is something I personaly would dearly love to do with my daughter. A long time ago stuff like this would never have been an issue in even a public school. Teachers that were suspected of being gay or lesbian were fired, or never hired to begin with! And crossdressers? No way would that EVER have been even remotly considered. Now it seems like they actually WANT gay and lesbian teachers? And for what purpose? To be politically correct. That's it. There are plenty of upstanding straight teachers who could do the job just as well, probably better, who can't even get hired. We need to go back to the days when school districts would never even consider hiring someone who made the choice to be a homosexual or a transgender, and those who were allowed to get in were so deep in the closet no one would even suspect because they knew better than to prance around with their "partners" in public like they were in a perfectly normal relationship with no shame at all. Our kids look up to their teachers and teachers have tons of influence on kids. Who in their right mind would want that kind of influence around their kids? What happend to the days when this would never have even been considered?

Amessenjah #fundie bbs.payableondeath.com

Witchcraft is not of the Lord. The power comes from energy that is creating and given by demonic spirits. These demonic spirits all have a rank, a purpose, and a master. Their master is Satan. Satan is very pleased if a person decides to tap into the powers of witchcraft. He may use those powers that the person calls upon to show them supernatural things;(deja-vu feelings, paranormal happenings, coincidences, superstitious feelings) These demonic spirits may take the form of animals, the animals may act a certain way that would make a person believe that they had power over that animal or even a human. Withcraft in my opinion quickly turns into a practice of vampirism. This vampirism that I am speaking of is merely spiritual. It is were people feed off the thoughts of one another in order to become more powerful. This really takes effect when the person has sex with the other, essentially they become one spiritually, so the energy or power is increased every time you sleep with a different person. I may be getting off the subject of witchcraft and into the subject of Hallucinogenic drug cults, but oh well. To me it is all the same. These behaviors and thought processes are highly addictive and can cause very bad emotional and physical problems. A person could have insomnia, lose a lot of weight, have psychotic episodes, become suicidal, put distant between themselves and family, lose touch with reality and sense of responsibility. This is merely my personaly experience and my personal reality. I do believe that it is a universal reality though. I believe that satan uses these same "deceiving realities" to keep people away from God and eventually destroy them.

Napoleon De Geso #wingnut #sexist #pedo incels.co

[Based] What is real culture

Real culture is having honor, values, and morals. Education is just outer level. And a lot of people are cultured just superficially, have culture just on surface, but inside are rotten. Especially femoids - she has read a lot of books, but she also sucked a lot of dicks. Commitment to superfically cultured cunt like this is dishonor, and noculture

And so being lolicon is sign of real culture, as it is desire for honor and purity. Teen girls sometimes have it, they may be not very educated, not "formed personalities", but if they not sluts [yet] - that is most important. And so sad to see them loosing culture by becoming sluts, and trying to save them is made illegal in this degeneracy. Times of barbarism, teen fuckboy can destroy girl's culture, and elder man must be slave for rotten filthy whore. I refuse it, I am man of culture

The DiDi Delgado #fundie medium.com

In Defense of Punching Cops

Why the original slave catchers can catch these hands

Note: The views and opinions expressed in this piece are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position of Black Lives Matter or any affiliations thereof.


I have a friend who punched a cop?—?or as he describes it, he “two-pieced his white ass and laid him out on the street.” This is doubly impressive because my friend is a queer Black man and he lived to tell about it.As legend has it, a white cop was witnessed aggressively harassing Black school children for exhibiting Black joy (aka running), and my friend (we’ll call him “Pigslayer”), was so overcome with emotion that he confronted the cop and the situation escalated from there. Before Pigslayer knew what came over him, he knocked the cop on his ass and made his escape by hopping on a conveniently departing bus nearby. Pigslayer watched from the moving window as the officer got to his feet and tried to regain his composure. Assuming the bus would get pulled over, my friend gave his belongings to a random passenger who volunteered to keep them safe upon his arrest.But an arrest never happened.The cop?—?presumably too embarrassed to report he’d just gotten his ass whooped by an angry faggot with frosted tips?—?never so much as called in the incident. Folks on the bus thanked Pigslayer for intervening to protect the Black youth, and now my friend re-tells the story whenever he has three or more drinks in his system. And no matter how many times he tells the story I think it’s going to end with his funeral, because 9 times out of 10 that’s exactly what would have happened. And 10 times out of 10 the cop would have gotten away with it. It’s no secret that in the United States, police have a license to kill.
In the United States, police have a license to kill.
It’s for this reason that I own a hoodie that reads, “Police Murder People.” I don’t wear it ironically; I wear it because (spoiler alert) police have a habit of murdering people. Call me antagonistic, but I think that warrants some acknowledgement.
image

“Police murder people.” No lies detected.Perhaps more interesting, however, is the fact that many Americans are under the belief that police are murdering us for our own good. Sometimes we eagerly call them to our houses so they can murder us in front of our families. Just two weeks ago, police killed a pregnant Black woman named Charleena Lyles, who had called to report a burglary at her home. The fact her death barely interrupted the news cycle should scare the shit out of all of us. Instead, most Americans remain unfazed. I’m not one to give cops credit, but that’s an impressive public relations feat.Convincing Americans that killer cops are performing a public service is the fascist equivalent of selling road kill as “free-range organic.” Bravo. I might even respect the deception if it didn’t put a huge target on my back?—?and the backs of all marginalized folks. In fact, the prevailing message that law enforcement has a right to brutalize us is so normalized that most of us don’t even find it odd. And why would we?This past spring, I watched a new TV show in which cops were given high-tech military grade weaponry to patrol and terrorize low income minority communities. In a rational world, we’d recognize this as blatant fascist propaganda. But in 2017 America, it’s just the third most racist show on Hulu Plus. It’s part of an ongoing PR campaign which allows police to assault everybody from children to old ladies with relative impunity. That sentiment is frightening enough in its own right, but this PR stunt has an added side effect I hadn’t considered until recently: The higher we place law enforcement on a seemingly immovable social pedestal, the more blasphemous statements like, “cops murder people,” become?—?even when undeniably true.This explains why I’m frequently referred to as a fanatic and an extremist in the comment sections of my articles and social media posts. I’ve even internalized this, and (like many queer Black organizers) have started referring to myself as a radical. I wear it as a badge of honor, but I don’t know if I’m prepared to live in a world where single moms who blog and actually pay for Hulu Plus are considered radical. If I’m radical, what does that make Pigslayer? If I’m an extremist, what does that make of the folks behind this violent NRA ad?


Aka: “In Defense of Shooting Blacks, Gays, Muslims, and the Poor”Inevitably, as the status quo shifts to the far right, it drags all of us along with it. That’s why Democrats today are about as liberal as stormtroopers®, and Pride festivals are patrolled by cops driving rainbow colored paddy wagons. Even the “liberal media” recently praised mass-murderer-turned-oil-painter George W. Bush for criticizing Donald Trump’s overt racism. This is the same guy who called for a constitutional amendment permanently banning gay marriage. Why is he suddenly doing light-hearted guest spots on Ellen? How did George “Mission Accomplished” Bush become the golden boy of the Huffington fucking Post? It’s likely for the same reason I’m now being lumped in with radical freedom fighters like Assata Shakur and Korryn Gaines, even though I thought a Molotov cocktail was a mixed drink until I was 28.One of the best examples of this glaring political shift happened back in January, when actual neo-Nazi, Richard Spencer, was punched in the face. Twice. It’s not the punches that highlighted the shift, but the fact they caused a national discussion on the morality of punching Nazis. I shit you not.
Being civil in the face of oppression is to be a spectator?—?or, more accurately, a perpetrator.
There was a time when punching Nazis was the only thing all Americans agreed upon?—?even before most Americans were cool with Black folks drinking from public water fountains. We set aside our differences when it came to understanding that Nazis ought to have their bells rung on sight. Here’s a short list of fictional characters who have physically assaulted Nazis over the years: Wonder Woman, Deadpool, Captain America, Rafael from the Ninja Turtles, Indiana Jones, Superman, and Captain Planet. Even Daffy Duck gave Hitler a concussion with a croquet mallet[/url], and we all agreed it was fine because Nazis obviously deserve concussions. Or at least they used to. Today, it’s up for debate.
image
Duck the police.

As Isaac Hayes¹ once said, “For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.” That seems to be true for everything except American liberalism, which has largely decided that acts of resistance should not extend beyond clever memes and stern words of admonishment. Being civil in the face of oppression is to be a spectator?—?or, more accurately, a perpetrator. During the course of my life, I’ve seen the far right crank the dial up to 10, while the left has tried to politely reason with them over the deafening noise. They want to be remembered as the voice of reason, not the voice of revolution. In essence, liberals are the fuckboys of America?—?screenshotting their seemingly righteous indignation so they can gaslight us later and stake claim to the moral high ground.Boy, bye.From where I’m sitting, there are only two possible solutions for re-calibrating the political spectrum to redefine leftist radicalism and far right conservatism. We can continue to slowly build grassroots movements and increase pressure on the powers that be to abandon their regressive and oppressive regimes…. or we can punch cops.I think both of these solutions have merit, but cop punching might solve our problem faster. For starters, we don’t need a lot of people punching cops. We just need enough so that Fox and Friends will think twice before labeling people like me extremists. The goal is to burst the bubbles of those who view my boring ass opinions and lifestyle as “extreme” in any way. Nothing puts that in perspective faster than Officer O’Mally getting laid out in front of 1 Police Plaza.I know that if my child one day becomes a victim of police abuse and harassment (and statistically they will), I’d want somebody to intervene and defend them. But I also know that aside from myself and Pigslayer, not many people would. I find that realization frightening. Does that make me an unhinged extremist, or a mother concerned about a legitimate threat to my child and a violation of my reproductive rights?As a bonus, decking cops would make decking Nazis seem tame by comparison, and essentially end that debate once and for all. If history is any guide, we know how this plays out anyway. It ALWAYS comes down to the people rebelling and punching cops. It’s only a question of when. The new normal is not sustainable. I’ve been to the mountain top, and trust me; it’s covered in knuckle sandwiches with extra bacon.Punching cops would be the perfect plan, if it weren’t for one glaring reality: You’ll probably end up getting murdered. Which sounds terrible, until you come to grips with the fact that cops are already murdering us. Maybe if more people knew, my idea wouldn’t sound so radical. Maybe I should stock up on more hoodies.________________