Similar posts

CH #sexist heartiste.wordpress.com

A fat tax has been seriously discussed on various platforms for years, usually supported by the premise that fat craps cost society a lot of money in higher health insurance premiums, mitigation overhead, and the daily annoyances of dealing with fatties in public spaces, making room for them, avoiding their stank, and spending mental energy looking away from their disgusting blobbiness while trying to suppress the retch reflex.

A well-meaning but nutritionally misguided fat tax (which taxed foods high in saturated fat) was even tried in Denmark, with positive results (the tax was later scrapped due to open borders…not kidding).

But what if I were to tell you that a Fat Chick Tax makes a lot more sense than a sex-blind generic fat tax? Tucked into a great post on macro-sexonomics (which reads a lot like Heartiste posts) from the blogger who calls himself Giovanni Dannato, the justification behind the Fat Chick Tax:

When most men rarely see higher than a 6.5 in public who isn’t flagrantly anti-social, their morale and motivation is sapped and the scale of sexual market value is drastically distorted in favor of those obese and plain women who stay behind.

While men will always get thirsty enough to settle for whatever they can find, they aren’t as willing to sacrifice as they would be if access to potential mates were more equitable. Once the girls they could approach are repulsive enough compared to anime porn, enthusiasm for the chase goes into a downward spiral.

For every low-status nerd who is willing to date a fat woman, there is another who ends up a celibate omega. This creates millions of bare branches with no roots or prospects in the social order, a state of affairs which makes steadily increasing agitation against the establishment inevitable.

Even those men who still succeed with women know they could be doing a lot better. Without any real status or bargaining leverage they are struggling with long term relationships and family formation. They have no more stake in the present state of affairs than do incels.

Just as illegal immigration and offshoring push down wages for everyone, most men see their sexual market payoff reduced by relentless demand inflation.
To put it in perspective, we all know how an influx of millions of pretty young women would be received by the matriarchy.

The overwhelming thirst caused by the hyper-inflationary collapse of the sexual market has played a significant role in the death of civic life. […] Clearly, a society that wants to persist under modern conditions must acknowledge the importance of balancing the sexual market for the sake of cohesion and stability. […]

A main point here is when we objectively rate beauty in a new inegalitarian age we can incorporate it into policy. A special tax on obese women for instance would tacitly acknowledge they are reneging on their side of the social contract by depriving society of the beauty that motivates male participation and helps sustain a workable balance of power between the sexes.

Similar penalties might apply to disfigurative piercings or tattoos.

Congregating in a few neighborhoods in a few cities could be dis-incentivized by removing feminist laws that make it easier for women to get nice white collar jobs they can’t get fired from and imposing special taxes on certain places of residence for single females.

These kinds of measures would obviously trigger massive female opposition, but if women as a whole tried living within a stable balance of power rather than an extractive matriarchy, they might actually like it.

The modren post-America sexual market is horribly skewed against men and their interests, and this as noted is a recipe for revolution. Giovanni is essentially recapitulating the same themes CH touched upon in posts like “Obesity to blame for Game“…

Game has been refined, taught and embraced by men in direct proportion to the shrinking pool of attractive thin girls. As the reduced supply of skinny chicks have seen their sexual market value skyrocket, they have adjusted by pricing their pussy out of reach for the average guy. In return, men have sought solutions to this new challenge in the rapidly advancing science of seduction. Where simple courtship worked in the past, it is no longer effective against the deep bunker defenses of the in-demand slender woman.

There has always been an evolutionary arms race between men and women in the quest for sex but now, for the first time in human history, the sheer numbers of fat chicks — in concert with the increase of financially independent women — is accelerating this arms race so fast that many people can’t cope and drop out. The tools of seduction for men become better by the day and the women counter with more impenetrable defenses. The tension is palpable. The whining and bitching is cacophonic. Distrust and dating blogs are at record highs.

If just 20% of fat chicks lost weight relations between the sexes would start to noticeably improve. And there would be more happiness in the world, because a skinny girl with hunger pangs is happier than a fat girl with a sheepdog and peanut butter.

…and in posts like “Game. obesity, and men dropping out“:

In short, no sociological theory into sex, marriage and family trends is complete without a long, hard look at female hypergamy, the one biomechanical force to rule them all, and its intersection with economic realities. The science is out there; when women become financially empowered, they begin to choose men based on criteria other than their ability to provide.

But that’s not all that Murray, et al are missing. I’m here to tell Murray and others perusing his findings that there is another, MASSIVE factor at work skewing the sexual market, and one that, just as unsurprisingly, gets almost no attention from the PC-soaked punditariat: female obesity.

Imagine you are an unmarried working class dude recently unemployed. You look around you and marvel at a sea of grotesquely misshapen fat women, rolls upon rolls of undulating flesh hiding stores of cheesy poofs, porky hellion spawn trailing their wakes, chins resting atop chins, bloated diabetic cankles stomping the Walmartian grounds like lumbering elephants. In some towns, close to 40% of the available single women are clinically OBESE.

This is obesity folks, not just overweight. Overweight women are physically repulsive, but obesity renders them monstrous. To clarify this assertion for the modern indoctrinated female reader: an obese woman is as sexually undesirable to men as a jobless, charmless, humorless, enfeebled, dull man is sexually undesirable to women.

So back to our realistic scenario: Our typical unmarried working class man surveys his cellulite-blasted kingdom (and it does not matter how fat he, himself, is, for fat men and thin men alike prefer the exquisite sight of slender female bodies), and he makes a quick hindbrain calculation. Does he bust his ass in a crappy service sector job doing women’s work for a shot at legally bound long-term commitment to a shuffling shoggoth dragging the bastard spawn of a hundred alpha males in tow, or does he say “fuck it” and turn to video games and porn featuring hot, thin chicks for his status and dopamine fix?

You see where this is heading. It’s entirely reasonable, and expected, that a lot of men would drop out of the intensified competition for the few remaining childless slender babes in a world full of fat asses, single moms, and fat assed single moms. And even among the small contingent of sexually appealing women, they make enough in government and HR paychecks to cover expenses plus gifts for their Skittles Men. What working stiff beta provider can compete on those terms?

A Fat Chick Tax would go a long way to bringing balance back to the force — bringing Truth & Beauty to a swellscape scarred by Lies & Ugliness — and in so doing return to White Men, the creators and maintainers of civilization, the motivation to keep sacrificing for the Good.

R. Michael Hands #fundie home.earthlink.net

Male bastard children should be sterilized by age nine and the mother sterilized at the birth of her first bastard child.

Society does not need bastards making more bastards, or even birthing more legitimate children.

Most bastards have a propensity to become social criminals and hate God's do's and don't laws.

Occasionally a bastard will break loose from the hell-bound plunge its mother has sent him on and will choose to serve God in mind, soul and body.

If this happens God expects the saved bastard to lead others of illegitimate birth into holiness living for Jesus.

11422168233 #sexist reddit.com

99.99 % males are simps/whiteknights (same thing) scums (That’s a FACT), And it wouldn’t be a exaggeration to say all males are simps scum, Real Alpha Males are Rare, If you are not celibate, You’re a simp simple as that, Just accept it, No amount of whining will make you “not simp scum”, If you REALLY wanna change that, Then improve on yourself, Your interaction with the opposite sex should be zero to rarely, Only when when you must have to and for only important reasons, Otherwise you’ll sucked deeper and deeper into the “females are wonderful effect” and then you’re fucked for life.

Self Declaration: Even though I was never a subscriber of r/MGTOW, Just call it celibacy simple as that.

Anyway, Ban me, Don’t ban me it makes no difference to me, I don’t care, I said what I had to say.

FidelCashflow & tomomot919 #sexist #racist incels.co

[Soy] Jfl at this Albanian simp

image

image

tomomot919

dude half of these posts are about girls trashing guys so... and stop creeping on people

b_tommyl

I'm a Albanian man myself. You wouldn't understand what happens to Albanian woman because you have the privilege of doing what ever the fuck you want with out being called a "kurve" just for simply breathing. And yes there is a word in Albanian for man hoes it's "Kurvar" wonder how you would feel if the roles were reversed.

tomomot919

dude stop simping... while you act like knight in shiny armor for some woman, she's getting railed by some Italian or German dude!

b_tommyl
Respecting woman and your fucking mother is not a bad thing. And also don't be saying shit like "i like non Albanian woman" but then getting jealous that Albanian woman dont like you. Also my sister so happens to be qettinq married to an amazing 6th generation American man of German decent. They both work, they both cook, they both clean, they do everything together. Most importantly he doesn't disrespect her or keep her locked inside a house cleaning like most Albanian men a known for

Albanian men as a whole are pretty based when it comes to females. This causes an issue because females want to be complete sluts that nobody can control, so they are always sperging out against Albanian men for trying to stop them from being whores.

What happened when an Albanian female enters the west is that she becomes a complete whore and will never date an albanian guy.

Above we have a simps albanian guy trying to white knight for women. Then a based Albanian man calls him out and drops some blackpills. The simp then reveals that hes right and his sister is married to an aryan non Albanian man who will allow her to be a degenerate whore

Roosh V #fundie returnofkings.com

Compelling new scientific research has shown that female insects and mammals are able to absorb foreign DNA throughout the cells of their bodies. In human beings, this phenomenon has been conclusively shown to occur in women during pregnancy where genetic material from her growing fetus becomes fused within areas of her brain, affecting her chances of developing Alzheimer’s disease.

The evidence now shows that female animals can incorporate sperm DNA from her prior sex partners. This foreign DNA winds up in future children after the woman successfully reproduces with a completely different male. In the human world, this means that the children a man has with a promiscuous woman could possess genes from previous sexual partners he has never seen or met.

...

The above study has two seismic implications. The first is that a woman can absorb enough DNA during her lifetime that it changes her phenotype (i.e. her appearance and overall health state). There could be some truth to the phrase “slut face” in which highly promiscuous women suffer a change to their appearance because of all the variable sperm from different males that have been deposited inside them.

The second implication stems from the fact that it’s scientifically conclusive that single mothers have DNA of their bastard children residing permanently within their bodies. Any man who reproduces with a single mom will have a child that contains DNA from the bastard spawn, which of course includes DNA from the absentee father. This means that men can be genetically cuckolded without being traditionally cuckolded, and that having a baby with a single mom is essentially giving the father of her first child a bonus prize in the game of evolution.

...

For thousands of years, a woman’s purity was cherished above all else when it came to creating a family. Now the scientific community is confirming the validity of that practice. Until the science is settled, men who insist on reproducing with a promiscuous woman should at least demand to interview her previous sexual partners so he can become familiar with the men whose genes may be passed on to his future children.

Insidious_Sid #fundie goingyourownway.com

Governments will continue to become more socialist because more women will vote, and women need socialist governments to pay for their whore spawn. The reason they don't care that beta's are leaving the plantation is because they see how women are propped up and taken care of. The alpha's (who they only want to fuck) are either not good marriage material or want nothing to do with it - so the women don't want marriage anyways. Marriage was just a pain in the ass for women - they did it as a means to and end, that end being a mans wallet. Now they access ALL men's wallets through the state.

There will be a tax war. Men saying "fuck it" will continue to be taxed more and more to pay for more and more bastard alpha babies. Governments will continue to create more insidious ways of getting men to pay for children that are not theirs. They will also bring in more immigrants from the most vile sewers of the world to get the vote from yet more.... socialist-dependent individuals. Impoverished immigrants with language barriers and barriers to the workforce are sheep - they will vote in droves for the governments that pander to them the most. Governments know they don't need marriages or babies from marriages. They can import voters from every corner of the earth.

Economies will crumble - women are actually waiting for this. They believe in the lies of the feminist utopia, where the rich white men at the top of the towers fall to their deaths, the towers topple and gold spills into the streets for everyone to plunder. They have no real knowledge of what the real repercussions of this will be - they think it will be handsome alphas fucking all the women while betas toil in the mines and obediently pay their taxes.

That's not what is going to happen. Before it's all over they will say "Oh no, what have we done?!"

These cries will fall on deaf ears.

Sig94 #fundie fellowshipoftheminds.com

Supposedly Hoffman was clean for 23 years. I rather tend to doubt that. Not in the environment he was in. He supposedly loved his family but …. not enough to legitimize his relationship with the mother of his three children. What do they call children born out of wedlock? Oh yeah, bastards. There’s a loving father for you.

So we have another self absorbed individual fresh out of rehab found assuming room temperature with a heroin spike sticking out of his arm. Dumb ass.

Hollywood mourns the loss of yet another star; the same Hollywood that celebrates the exact kind of relationship that spawns bastards, glamorizes pornography and drug abuse and makes gazillions of dollars in the process.

Wake me when it’s over.

Barry - Pole Choking Faggot #conspiracy godlikeproductions.com

Here's why Bull-Queers & Jews are a Dangerous Combination...

""
The Nazi party was founded by homosexuals. The Bratwurstgloeckl, a tavern frequented by homosexual roughnecks, is where Rohm joined the handful of sexual deviants (and occultists).

It was no coincidence that homosexuals were among those who founded the Nazi Party. In fact, the party grew out of a number of groups in Germany which were centers of homosexual activity and activism.
""

But it was not just the Nazi party Homosexuals...

Bull-Queer - Churchill met with Hitler as a young man and allegedly had Butt-Sex with him?

[link to i.imgur.com]

They were Bull-Queer, homosexual Pals.

Field Marshal Montgomery was a Homosexual.

Hitler was the Bastard Spawn of Jew-Banksters...

Hitlers Mother worked as a "Housekeeper" for a German-Jew Banker.

References to follow...

Thread: Hitler - A different perspective - Catholic Church - "Hitler Youth" = Diddle Little Boys

""
There are at least four women, including his own niece, with whom Hitler had sexual relationships, although these relationships were not normal. Both Waite and Langer suggest that his sexual encounters with women included expressions of his coprophilic perversion as well as other extremely degrading forms of masochism.

It is interesting to note that all four women attempted suicide after becoming sexually involved with Hitler.

Two succeeded.

Jewish historian by the name of Samuel Igra...

claims that Hitler:
"had been a male prostetute in Vienna at the time of his sojourn there, from 1907 to 1912, and that he practiced the same calling in Munich from 1912 to 1914"

Desmond Seward
says Hitler is listed as a homosexual in Viennese police records.

Walter Langer, that during several of those years Hitler chose to live in a Vienna flophouse known to be

inhabited by many homosexuals.

Frank Rector writes that, as a young man, Hitler was often called der schoen Adolf (the handsome Adolf) and later his looks were also to some extent helpful in gaining big-money support from Ernst Rohms circle of wealthy JEW gay friends.

A psychological profile of Hitler. His report, kept under wraps for 29 years...

Langer writes that Hitler was certainly a coprophile (a person who is sexually aroused by human excrement) and may have practiced homosexuality as an adult.

He cites the testimony of Hermann Rauschning, a former Hitler confidant who, reports that he has met two boys who claimed that they were Hitlers homosexual partners.

Hitler calls Foerster Bubi, which is a common nickname employed by homosexuals in addressing their partners [back then].

Hitler derives sexual pleasure from looking at mens bodies and associating with homosexuals.

A well-known fact is that Hitlers greatest hero was Frederick the Great, a well-known homosexual.

Hitler was closely associated with Ernst Rohm and Rudolf Hess, two homosexuals who were among the very few people with whom he used the familiar "du" in speaking.

Hitler left the prison he fretted about his friend who languished there, and spoke of him tenderly, using Austrian diminutives: Ach mein Rudy, mein Hesserl

Whenever Hitler got a present he liked or drew an architectural sketch that particularly pleased him, he would run to Hess who was known in homosexual circles as Frauline Anna as a little boy would run to his mother to show his prize to her.

One of Hitlers prized possessions was a handwritten love letter which King Ludwig II had written to a manservant.

Hitler seemed to prefer homosexual companions and coworkers. In addition to Rohm and Hess, two of his closest friends, Hitler filled key positions with known or suspected homosexuals.

Reportedly, Hitler Youth leader, Baldur Von Schirach was bisexual; Hitlers private attorney, Reich Legal Director, Minister of Justice.

Governor-General of Poland, and public gay-hater Hans Frank was said to be a homosexual;

Hitlers adjutant Wilhelm Bruckner was said to be bisexual;

Walter Funk, Reich minister of Economics [and Hitlers personal financial advisor] has frequently been called a notorious homosexual or as a jealous predessesor in Funks post, Hjalmar Schacht, contemptuously claimed, Funk was a harmless homosexual and alchoholic;

[Hitlers second in command] Hermann Goering liked to dress up in drag and wear campy make-up;

SS Chief Heinrich Himmlers pederastic proclivities [were] captured on film by Nazi film maker Walter Frenze.

Igra, states that Hitlers chauffeur and one-time personal secretary, Emile Maurice, was a homosexual.

Moreover, even more interesting is this, Julius Streicher, the notorious Jew-baiter, was originally a school teacher, but was dismissed by the Nuremberg School Authorities, following numerous charges of pederasty brought against him.

Reinhard Heydrich, was homosexual.

Richard Grunberger tells of a party given by Nazi propagandist, Joseph Goebbels, which degenerated into a homosexual orgy.

A recent biography of Albert Speer by Gitta Sereny speaks of a homo-erotic relationship.

Hitlers personal bodygaurds were almost always 100 percent homosexuals.

The Nazi party was founded by homosexuals. The Bratwurstgloeckl, a tavern frequented by homosexual roughnecks, is where Rohm joined the handful of sexual deviants (and occultists).

It was no coincidence that homosexuals were among those who founded the Nazi Party. In fact, the party grew out of a number of groups in Germany which were centers of homosexual activity and activism.

Nietzsche was dubbed the Father of National Socialism.

Nietzsche is probably more deserving of this distinction, being so labeled by Nazi luminaries Dr. Alfred Rosenberg and Dr. Frank. Others have called him the Father of Fascism. Rabidly

anti-Christian and a homosexual, Nietzsche founded the God is dead movement and contributed to the development of existentialist philosophy.

Nietzsches publisher, Peter Gast, called Nietzsche one of the fiercest anti-Christians and atheists.

Nietzsche never married, and had no known female sex partners, but went insane at age 44 from syphilis and eventually died of it. According to Sigmund Freud

and Carl Jung, Nietzsche had caught the disease at a homosexual brothel in Genoa, Italy.

The extended-arm Seig Heil salute, for example, was a ritual of the Wandervoegel (Wandering Birds or Rovers), a male youth society that became the German equivalent of the Boy Scouts.

The Wandervoegel was started in the late 1800s by a group of homosexual teenagers. Its first adult leader, Karl Fischer, called himself der Fuehrer (the Leader).

Hans Blueher, a homosexual Nazi philosopher and important early member of the Wandervoegel, incited a sensation in 1912 with the publication of The German Wandervoegel Movement as an Erotic

Phenomenon, which told how the movement had become one in which young boys could be introduced into the homosexual lifestyle.

The Wandervoegel and other youth organizations were later merged into the Hitler Youth, which itself became known among the populace as the Homo Youth because of rampant homosexuality.

Sturmabteilung (Storm Troopers, the SA) were largely the creation of another homosexual, Gerhard Rossbach.

Rossbach, who historian Gruber says was a open homosexual, formed the Rossbachbund (Rossbach Brotherhood), a homosexual unit of the Freikorps (Free Corps).

Rossbach also formed a youth organization under the Rossbuchbund, calling it the SchilljugendSchill Youth).

Rossbachs staff assistant, Lieutenant Edmund Heines, a pederast and murderer, was put in charge of the Schilljugend.

Eisenhower...Churchill...Hitler...Stalin...

All played on the same team...

Jews & Bull-Queers - Verses - The World

Working together to exterminate the Christian, Protestant, Puritan, Separatist...

"
Winston Churchill was a member of the Freemasons, and a member of the Loyal Waterloo Lodge of the National Independent Order of Odd Fellows.
"

"Freemasons" a Jew controlled organization...

"Order of Odd Fellows" = Bull-Queer, Pederast...

Prez Jeff Davis #racist therightstuff.biz

[From "Genocide: The Inescapable Conclusion"]

Genocide is just a word invented by a Jew to demonize the Nazis. As a Dixian-American, I feel no particular link to the Nazis, swastikas, Roman salutes, etc. I’m really pretty ambivalent on those things. Whatever. Jean-Marie Le Pen hit the nail on the head when he called the Jew/Gypsy genocide a detail of history. Ethnic cleansing is a universal part of world history. Nations have always had intermittent wars, wherein they killed their enemies. So what? The common pejorative use of the word genocide as something unthinkable is ignorance gone to seed as it elevates losing for your people as somehow morally superior to winning for your people. Meanwhile Jews don’t seem to show any remorse for genociding the Hittites, Girgashites, Amorites, Canaanites, Perizzites, Hivites, Jebusites, or the Amalekites.

It is to our peril that we say “I respect nationalism for all peoples.” While we may sometimes be able to strike up treaties and mutually beneficial trade agreements, or the exchange of scholarly research, or a mutualistic white supremacy such as slavery, we must realize that in the big picture human races are indeed biological competitors, that human evolution is a giant tournament with immutable rules that we cannot cancel and in which elimination means racial extinction rather than just failure to win a trophy. There have always been and always will be eliminations. The only thing we have to decide is whether we want our race to continue to the next round at the expense of others or for other races to continue to the next round at the expense of our own. While it is possible some remnant populations may be retained for cheap labor or medical research, the pro-genocide stance is an inescapable conclusion on at least three different grounds:
• competition for resources
• disease control
•• reservoir for existing diseases
•• emerging diseases and antibiotic resistance
•• engineered diseases (biological warfare)
• environmental pollution

[...]

The brown hordes of the world are a reservoir for diseases that we could easily eradicate if we were only willing to eradicate the host population. Rotary club has long worked toward the vision of A Polio Free World, and could have achieved it a long time ago if we would only eliminate the native population of Afghanistan and Pakistan along with some other problem areas. Rotary claims that polio vaccines can be as cheap as $0.60 USD each, but of course these children (that we also pay to feed and vaccinate for other diseases) grow up to bear more children who will also need to be vaccinated and fed. Meanwhile, the going rate for AK-47 ammo is less than $0.30 USD, can be administered at any age, and actually breaks the cycle. With wide scale 3rd world genocides, we could much more easily eradicate polio, measles, mumps, whooping cough, influenza, rubella, zika, malaria, and many other diseases for good.

[...]

It’s important to realize that new diseases and antibiotic resistant strains of microorganisms are continually evolving. For instance, AIDS is not a disease from antiquity, but could have been eradicated before it was even discovered if negroes had been eradicated from Africa as little as 50-100 years ago.

[...]

Most readers are probably already aware that preserving endangered species is a white thing, but perhaps few have realized that third worlders will happily dump durable pollutants into the air and water that will eventually end up in the globally shared seafood supply. Example: DDT was banned from USA in 1972 but is still being found in seafood and still being made and used in India while China only recently stopped manufacturing it. Given that DDT only has a 150 yr half life in water, it is unlikely that India alone is going to doom the world’s oceans with this one chemical, but it demonstrates a problem that is bound to grow as the 3rd world grows. If African countries ever manage to profitably manufacture and use chemicals like this, there is little doubt that they will use them carelessly, just like they mismanage everything else they do. Similar concerns should be expected if any of these countries ever manages to split the atom and generate nuclear wastes.

The inescapable conclusion:
Although deportations and international treaties may mitigate some of the issues listed above, none of them will be fully resolved without implementing the largest genocide the world has seen up to this point. It is my personal opinion that the biggest threat dindu nations pose to whites is through diseases and that peaceful deportations would do little to diminish that threat. I also think that with present trends, it is more likely that the next deadly pandemic will arise naturally from the 3rd world rather than engineered by the Islamic world, however the West’s penchant for affirmative action in education may just educate the right Muslim scientists for the job.

Genocide necessarily involves either suppression of fertility or active or passive killing, or some combination of methods. Passive killing might include the refusal to supply aid such as food or medical care, preferring to just let Nature run her course, or refusal to come to the rescue when brown tribes genocide each other. The passive method would cause greater suffering and would not finish the job, as there will always be a remnant population to rebound in time. Clearly, an active genocide using white man methods would be more humane than passively letting Nature or savage tribes to do a much sloppier and less complete job. In the same way that animal lovers cannot adopt and care for every stray, but must accept that many be euthanized or sterilized, so it must be with the lower races of humanity.

The Bright side:
Extermination of the brown hordes in their homelands could give vast new territories to us. They are ours for the taking. Perhaps some readers wish they could have taken part in the US Homestead acts. Those days do not have to be gone forever. We could gain vast territories and give them away to settlers much like in the old days. We could even form new white countries, and settle much more territory than the entire continental US put together. In Africa, India, and Latin America 100 or even 1,000 acre tracts could be given away to young homesteaders. Or perhaps our governments could just auction parcels of land or mineral rights instead of collecting taxes. It is up to us white men to agree on the justness of our cause, how the spoils will be divided among us, and to go out and conquer and settle like only white men can.

Note: This article is meant to provoke thought and discussion and should be used for informational and educational purposes only. TRS does not support church shootings or any sort of violent or illegal activity of any kind. Support your local Police.

jeff & eddie #fundie forums.filefront.com

Here I sit again, ready to dispel the evolving myths of evolution. Just recently I remember reading an article in a scientific journal explaining how when you breed a Tiger with Lion, you get a "Liger". A mix between the two giant cats. Interestingly enough, these "Ligers" are sterile, which demonstrates that you cannot mix two species of animal and get another species. It doesn't happen.
If you breed Lions for thousands of generations, the results will always be a lion. If you breed tigers for thousands of generations, the results will always be a tiger. The moment you mix the two species together, you get a sterile animal. Another nail in the coffin for evolution.

But this is just of course one of the many flaws regarding Evolution, common sense indicates that complex organs such as the eye, wings, cannot evolve by chance. But not according to evolution which wants us to believe everything is by chance. By chance. This is akin to suggesting that a tornado ripping through a junkyard will cause the flying debris will assemble themselves into working jet airliner. Silly, isnt it? Not only is it silly, it's flat out impossible. Anyone can look at a Jet Airliner and come to the conclusion that it had a creator. Someone created the parts, and assembled it. It did not happen by chance.

But even ignoring the above, one merely has to look at what evolution really says to arrive at the conclusion that it's just bogus. Evolution is best defined(according to biologists) as the "change in allele frequency over given populations". Anyone with even minimal knowledge about biology and genetics should immediately recognize that that definition has not been directly observed. They'll suggest that evolution is correct because well, you can breed traits into animals, such as a better milk producing cow, or hairless cats. Seeing that their theory was in trouble, they needed to explain this, so they called it "microevolution". So they claim we can observe microevolution, but not macroevolution(a more larger step). Well, any attempts to recreate macroevolution have failed. If you'll recall my story of the Liger(bred between a tiger and a lion), as it is simply sterile. Where does this leave us? Well, it means evolution simply doesn't occur. At least according to their own definition.

And yet, even beyond these overwhelming mounds of evidence, we see people fighting for the right to teach it. Fighting for the right to say its fact, when it's simply hogwash! I predict it will only be a few years until we finally rid our school cirriculum of evolution. Replace the theory with something more plausible, intelligent design.

Aurick the Great White Elf #racist stormfront.org

Today I saw a White woman with a black man walking down the street with their vile spawn half-breed bastard. They are sick if they think for a second that the world is going to accept this, or that this is normal. It is still wrong and I hope the vile spawn of such an unholy union gets sick and dies as it is unfit to live anyhow and genetically weaker than either a pure Black or pure White person would be. There used to be a law against such things unforntunatly that changed. Common sense should be enough but these people have none.
Mescegeny is disgusting and leads to all sorts of genetic diorders and diseased mutated offspring that look like little devils that are sick weaklings and they are evil and more chance of being retarded or mongeloids.
I am glad my Grandma had that little talk with me about such things. So many of todays youth seemed to have not been so lucky and they seem to be very confused on this issue. They do not understand what they are doing is destroying their families forever! It cannot be undone once done. Races were not meant to be mixed and that is why God made us different. That is why God put them in Africa and Whites in Europe far from each other because we were never supposed to mix.
Further more Black males commit crimes domestic violence and kill their White girlfriends or wives. This is reality wake up!
Well at least I stayed true, and I know that everyday of my life, and my Grandmother and all my ancestors look down from Heaven upon me with pride!

Mick Williams/Lady Checkmate #fundie disqus.com


Mick Williams:
When I worked in blood bank, we had, on rare occasions, a request for a fetus-sized donor unit. This was a 'satellite bag', from which you could tap into the blood for any small volume, and the system remained sterile. Doctors could then transfuse the fetus, which suffered from maternal antibodies (incompatible blood types). Compare that to the left's disdain for infants' rights to life.

Lady Checkmate:
• Only the simple believe that the alt-left is not still swearing to take down as many Bible-believing Christians as possible, still hatefully and obsessively stalking certain churchs and Christians worldwide
(business owners, pastors, bloggers, and bible-believing Christians in general), to continue to stage false claims of discrimination, still issuing death threats, and still plotting how to hurt innocent Christians. Remember:

image

I guess they just want to beat "love" Christians to death.

• I continue to pray God's will is done. I wish I could take all of the unwanted babies and care for them.

• I never made that connection. There are female prophets in the Bible, but none of the apostles were female. When the word addresses pastors and deacons, they are always male. I agree with
and submit to God's word.

RREEEEEEEEE #sexist #psycho incels.co

The feminists are right. Men need to die.

Just think about the hordes of cucks and simps that will lynch you if you dare say anything negative about a female. Just think about the hordes of cucks and simps that will donate tons of money to females just for existing. Just thinking about the hordes of cucks and simps that will exploit female sexuality by enabling and encouraging degeneracy. Just think of the hordes of cucks and simps that will buy and eat chocoshit chip cookies. Just think about the hordes of cucks and simps that are swiping right on landwhales and grannies on Tinder. Just think about the hordes of cucks and simps that are inflating the egos of below average females by giving them validation. Just think about the hordes of cucks and simps.

Looksmaxxcel #sexist #fundie incels.co

[JFL] My little sister asked a pretty funny question.

"How come the boys like girls, but the girls don't like the boys?"

She even asked, "Why are so many girls gay?"
JFL at this society.

r/thathappened

But in all seriousness I think you should break the news to her, the sooner the better

I did. I told her that it was because girls only liked a small majority of boys. I also told her to stay away from boys especially at her age.

How old is she?

12.

Tell her that she has to remain a virgin until marriage.

My parents are ardent christians who believe in no sex before marriage. They're much more strict with my little sister because they don't like how my other sister turned out.

I sincerely hope she grows up to become a respectable pure woman instead of falling for the degeneracy trap and becoming just another thot.

you just made her want chad even more because it being forbidden makes it romantic

Me and my dad joked that we would wait for her "boyfriend" with a shotgun, but I was only half joking when I said I would kill the little shit.

letsgobish29 #sexist #homophobia reddit.com

they're also still obviously attracted to men. lesbianism is just extreme degeneracy, when a girl has been alpha widowed and finds 'beta comfort' in her female friends instead of a beta male and they twist that need into a perversion, desperately trying to replace that lost chad intimacy with her new comfort provider. of course women cannot actually perform this role like a beta male can, so she ends up becoming even more mentally unsound and that's why all lesbian relationships are a fraudulent disaster.. they are trying to force something that is unnatural.

Dota #fundie occidentinvicta.com

The second assumption stems from the feminist view that Nationalism and feminism are mutually exclusive; which translates into women’s interests being separate from nation unless feminists are allowed to reconstruct culture on their own terms. The third point listed above, and the most obvious, is the tired old cliche that the traditional female role of protecting and nurturing culture (as opposed to subverting it) is inherently oppressive. It’s impossible to love a nation when you despise half of its population.

As I’ve written previously, traditional cultures produce women that willingly protect and fight for the values of their cultures. Despite their valiant struggles, feminists condemn such women as being brainwashed by patriarchy; which brings to surface certain contradictions in feminist thought. On one hand, feminism aims to restore women’s autonomy by seizing it from the jaws of patriarchy, yet that agency must be exercised solely at the feminist’s discretion. Very few feminists (to my knowledge)stood in support of France’s Muslim women who were barred from wearing the headscarf by law; so much for a woman’s body being her own. When their lesser sisters fail to act in accordance with their dogma, feminists infantalize their motives and actions with a paternalism that they are quick to criticize in men. Some have rightly referred to feminism as ‘paternalism in lipstick.’

The second contradiction lies in their rather peculiar definition of “independence.” When North American men think of independence we generally picture a society free from government intrusion that protects our lives, liberty, and property; as articulated by John Locke. We picture an existence where a man is free to pursue any vocation as he feels inclined. The spirit of freedom that underlies the protestant work ethic forms the very basis of our definition of independence. Free and independent men do not desire charity and observers during the great depression noted extreme shame in the eyes of the men who stood in bread lines. Women on the other hand (feminists especially) are more than content to live on charity; they simply refer to it with euphemisms like “Child support” and “Alimony.” This naturally calls for a more expansive and intrusive state whose function is to legislate this highway robbery and ensure the redistribution of wealth from men to women. It’s unsurprising why astute critics have called feminism a front for communism. Yet this contradiction is made evident when contrasted with the reality that women are still dependant, not on families and men, but on the state. Women aren’t independent, their dependence has merely been shifted onto the nanny state. Independent men want a smaller state whereas independent women desire a large nanny state to hold their hand (Family laws, affirmative action, ect).

Roosh #racist rooshv.com

Why can’t the Muslims, Africans, and Indians be more civilized like people in the West? Why do they insist on endless breeding when their children have no chance of attending an Ivy League university? Isn’t there a way we can help them to see the light of civilization, rationale thinking, and clean hygiene? These are questions you may have asked at some point when looking down on the third-world barbarians, but from the perspective of nature, it’s not them who are the problem. We are the problem. We are the defects of nature that will be eradicated.

Nature does not care about education, “high quality” offspring, college degrees, equal rights, cleanliness, sustainability, philosophy, or the environment. It cares about fertility and might, and the species or race that is most fertile and most powerful will be rewarded with the bounty that the Earth provides. The people who are able to take over the planet in sheer numbers, regardless of its intelligence or manners, will come to rule the world, just like how homo sapiens came to overrun the more intelligent Neanderthals by breeding at a far superior rate. The most intelligent race on the planet can use their smarts to fortify themselves in caves as the more numerous barbarians take over the planet, even if they’re nothing more than mindless zombies.

Rational thinking from the enlightenment era, when taken to its logical end in proving that families, divinity, and traditional standards aren’t necessary, along with the notion that the individual is God, leads to the suicide of society. Rationale, in it’s beautifully cherished civilized form, leads to the end of any race who participates in it, while the stupid barbarians with IQs of 95 or lower, who follow a two-thousand year old book that implores them to conquer and chop off heads, continue to multiply and take over more lands.

We are the mistakes of nature. We are the grotesque. We have been condemned for replacement, forsaken by God for enabling over one billion abortions in just a few decades while we attempt to change the rules of nature, to declare man woman and woman man. Our goal is not one of spiritual enlightenment but of achieving the most vile feats of degeneracy.

Because of our cultural and biological sterility, I believe we have been fated for destruction. Even though this end stares us right in the face, the best we can muster is a few rants on internet web sites, while the barbarians are raping, conquering, and breeding. I promise you they will win. History shows that the barbarians always win. They are the solution to a broken people. They faithfully worship their gods while we worship our Facebook likes and celebrities. We are so hopelessly sterile, so anti-life, that nature will celebrate when we are replaced by those who can barely read. But they will treasure the life of their kind, and that’s enough.

Even if we solve all the political problems of the day, and neutralize the most vulgar of our society, what are we left with? A shrinking population and citizens so atomized that they are even losing the ability to communicate with each other, who have to use computerized apps and alcohol to fornicate while the female is on sterility medication, which her parents awarded her upon turning 16 years old. Our punishment is coming. Lands of the West will be given away, and even if the barbarian horde can be beaten with technology, there will be a day where there’s man left to stand against them to push the kill button. The barbarians will inherit the new world until they become civilized themselves and the cycle renews once more, like it has many times in the past.

Nature doesn’t care about your egalitarian laws or your superior IQ. It cares about reproduction and power, and what the barbarians lack in intelligence, they make up for in life energy. We are the anomalies, we are the mistakes, and unless we re-discover the ways of family, tradition, and God, we must be ready to accept the inevitable end that it was us who become so weak as a people that we didn’t even bother having a gate, and that all the barbarians had to do was walk right in.

ShadowTheEdgehog #sexist incels.co

[Blackpill] Cucking used to be a punishment for Thots OUR ANCESTORS WERE BASED AS FUCK

Francois Maximilian Misson, a French traveller and writer, recorded the method used in England in the early 18th century:

The way of punishing scolding women is pleasant enough. They fasten an armchair to the end of two beams twelve or fifteen feet long, and parallel to each other, so that these two pieces of wood with their two ends embrace the chair, which hangs between them by a sort of axle, by which means it plays freely, and always remains in the natural horizontal position in which a chair should be, that a person may sit conveniently in it, whether you raise it or let it down. They set up a post on the bank of a pond or river,[3] and over this post they lay, almost in equilibrio, the two pieces of wood, at one end of which the chair hangs just over the water

They place the woman in this chair and so plunge her into the water as often as the sentence directs, in order to cool her immoderate heat.

dare I say,...BASED

Prepare your rear orifice for this is even more based:

Cucking stools were chairs formerly used for punishment of disorderly women

The stools were technical devices which formed part of the wider method of law enforcement through social humiliation

A common alternative was a court order to recite one’s crimes or sins after Mass or in the market place on market day

BASED BASED BASED BASED BASED BASED BASED BASED BASED BASED BASED BASED BASED BASED BASED BASED BASED BASED BASED BASED BASED BASED BASED BASED BASED BASED BASED BASED BASED BASED BASED BASED BASED BASED BASED BASED BASED BASED BASED BASED BASED BASED BASED BASED BASED BASED BASED BASED BASED BASED

Imagine that in our time.
You are Walking into a Walmart and come across a very strange sight: There is a Woman, strapped to a Chair, gagged and Bound. Next to her stands a dude with a Megaphone and a piece of paper.
He starts blasting his voice through the Megaphone:

"THIS BE STACY OF THE HOUSE OF THOT, SHE HATH HAD UNSCRUPLOUS SEXUAL INTERCOURSE WITH MANY A MAN, WOMAN AND EVEN SOME 4 LEGGED CREATURES, THE SPECIES OF WHICH SHALL NOT BE NAMED, TO PRESERVE THE SANITY OF THOSE PRESENT AT THIS HOUR.
IT FOLLOWS A LIST OF THE MEN STACY HATH HAD SEX WITH:
CHAD
CHAD
CHAD
CHAD
CHAD
TYRONE
GROWLER
SPIKEY
SECRETARIAT
...

jfl based Level of the Charts, no wonder our ancestors fucking conquered the globe against all odds.

Using water to quench that burning desire for chad thats in her pussy. ER level of basedness ngl

JFL I can't stop thinking About this. Imagine just yelling out someones dirty laundry in public jfl.
Imagine theres is a wedding and suddenly a Government offical Shows up with a Megaphone like:
"hold up hold up, stop the ceremony, this Woman has been accused of being a whore *clears throat*

STACY MCCORMAC, AGE 27, HAS FUCKED OVER 200 MEN IN COLLEGE AND DONE MULTIPLE GANGBANGS, SHE ALSO HAD SEX WITH A DOG AND ENJOYS THE COMPANY OF KNOWN CRIMINALS, STACY HAS HAD SO MUCH ANAL SEX THAT SHE HAS UNDERGONE EXTENSIVE SURGERY TO STOP SHIT LEAKING INTO HER PUSSY THROUGH HER WRECKED COLON WALL"

(this condition is real and ist alled Anal Fistula. It's basically when the wall between the pussy and colon gets wrecked by physical Trauma - cock smashing into it- and fecal matter starts leaking into the pussy. They have shit smell coming out their pussy. ANAL SEX IS HEALTHY AND NORMAL BTW JUST IGNORE THIS BTW, JUST PEEPEE IN POOPOO MAX BTW)

Jennifer Hartline #fundie stream.org

I see the liberal, secular feminist and the homosexual/transgender ideologies running smack into each other like bulls. The losers in this bloody clash? There will be many, but let’s talk about the most ironic losers: women.

Neither ideology respects true femininity and the beauty of womanhood. Both want to empty it of its gift and uniqueness.

Both have created a caricature of woman. Both exploit what they find useful about the female body and shun the rest. Both have reduced womanhood to only the parts that serve their agenda.

Both the modern, perpetually-contracepting woman and the transgender “woman” are sterile. The former disdains her natural fertility and procreative nature, going to great lengths to quash the nuisance; the latter insists he doesn’t even need fertility to be a woman.

The transgender ideology insists that a man can, through chemical and surgical means, simply “transition” and become a woman. Poof! It’s magic!

Gender is supposedly “fluid” now and a meaningless social construct at that.

But hold on, not so fast!

The transgender movement insists there is a distinct difference between the male and female brain; between the male and female soul. Those who “transition” are considered trapped in the wrong body — the dissonance between how they feel and think and their genitals is proof. Yes, they say, being male or female obviously matters, and there are clearly important differences.

We’re told that “men” have menstrual periods now. “Men” have abortions, too. (So much for the shiny trophy of “women’s reproductive freedom.”)

Even the liberal feminist theme show, favorite of college students everywhere, The Vagina Monologues, is now sexist and insensitive because it excludes those “women” who don’t have a vagina.

I can’t believe I even wrote the preceding paragraphs in earnest. It all sounds insane. It is insane.

In 2015, it’s just a matter of adding or removing pieces and parts, like playing with Mr. Potato Head. Or Mrs. Potato Head. (How long before that toy becomes just Potato Head Person? Any bets?)

I’ve had enough of misappropriated womanhood.

Bruce Jenner gets pumped full of female hormones, has cosmetic facial surgery, gets large breast implants, hair extensions, makeup and a push-up bra, and suddenly, he is supposedly a woman. That’s all it means to be a woman: big boobs, lingerie and makeup.

Never mind that his new breasts are useless. They’re just decoration, and garish decoration at that. They symbolize a superficial “womanhood” that’s empty of meaning or purpose beyond sexual arousal.

A woman’s breasts mean infinitely more than that. The human race can credit its entire survival up to our modern era on mothers’ breasts. Mother’s milk from mother’s breasts is an integral part of being a woman, whether the modern feminist likes it or not.

The female body is gloriously designed to grow and nurture new human life. It’s an undeletable part of the female code at the deepest level. Whether our wombs ever carry a child, or whether our breasts ever nurse a baby is irrelevant to the fact that our feminine physical nature was created for that miraculous purpose. It’s inextricable to womanhood.

That is not something any surgeon can replicate with silicone, nor any doctor with artificial hormones. Bruce Jenner’s surgeon has created a mannequin, not a woman.

Adding insult to injury is the exploitation of women’s reproductive parts in the service of manufacturing children. Women are merely “ovens” used to create babies conceived without sex for the satisfaction of same-sex couples, single parents and other couples who want to “design” their child according to their specifications.

Mothers are replaced with “donor eggs” and surrogate wombs, and neither will actually have any presence in the child’s life. Who needs a mom? All that’s wanted is the raw material and the human incubator, please.

This is a profane indignity to women, to womanhood and to motherhood. It once again reduces women to parts. Parts that can be bought, rented and used to satisfy someone else’s wants. We can’t yet grow our special-ordered kids in the lab; we still need God’s equipment to get the job done, so we gotta have some wombs to use.

Those who champion abortion, free contraception, same-sex “marriage” and surrogacy are the ones always screaming that Republicans, conservatives, and especially Catholics, treat women like “breeders” without brains or any worth of their own. Ironic, eh? Who’s zoomin’ who here?

Who really appreciates the inherent, unique gift of womanhood? Those who just want to use the egg and rent the womb but refuse the mother, or those who know that a mother is irreplaceable in a child’s life?

Who really values women? Those who think plastic surgery and pills can turn a man into a woman, or those who understand the feminine genius that goes beyond boobs and makeup?

Who really respects a woman’s body? Those who believe it’s necessary to shut down her natural, healthy fertility with carcinogenic hormones, and even intentionally damage a healthy, functioning organ with crazy devices? No way. Doing damage to a woman’s health and body in the name of “equality” doesn’t sound very equal to me.

Fertility and child-bearing are part of the whole package of a woman. You can’t claim to value women, or champion women’s rights or equality and then pick her apart like you’re scouring a used car for spare parts. You can’t take what’s useful to you and leave the rest of her.

You can’t fabricate a sterile “woman” out of a man’s body and call him a woman. A woman is nobody’s Play-doh creation. She’s the marvelous handiwork of God. Her physical body, her feminine nature, her mind, her gifts and her strengths are all designed with intent and purpose by Him out of great love.

Respect the whole woman — her body, her fertility, her nature that is complementary to a man’s, her motherhood — or you don’t really respect her at all.

Know_What_Fvck_This #fundie reddit.com

The 80/20 rule makes suicide reasonable

Basically, if you're not in the top 20% of chads your life will be miserable. Men only exist to do labor, raise Chad's offspring, and die. I feel, men should have a right to rebel against nature, however. 80% of men should be euthanized or aborted, do tests and analysis to see if the infant will be in the top 20%, if they will not, terminate the pregnancy. Think of all the misery that could be avoided if all non-Chads were granted the freedom of death! And, it'd make women happy, all the undesirable males she didn't want are now dead or never existed and only chad exists, they'd be thrilled! If not 80% of males, the bottom 20% of physical and mental defects such as myself should be euthanized soon after birth or prior to it.

David Chase Taylor #conspiracy truthernews.wordpress.com

SWITZERLAND, Zurich — Based on breaking news and events, it appears that the Obama administration (at the behest of the CIA in Switzerland) is preparing to execute a wave of terror attack on Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey Circuses. That being said, other smaller circuses could be targeted as well.

Although the state-sponsored terror group ISIS could be fingered in a circus-related attack, it’s far more likely that the CIA will blame circus-related terror attack on so-called domestic terrorists and/or so-called eco-terrorists who want to free the circus animals from a life of abuse and captivity.

Exactly what type of circus-related terror attacks are planned is not known, but a gun-related massacre which cuts down circus animals, circus employees and patrons alike is the most likely terror scenario. Said massacre will likely cause a stampeded which will kill far more people than the original attack.

The feds could also engineer a so-called “accident” or “natural disaster” during upcoming circuses (e.g., biological outbreak, tent collapse, fire, gas explosion, lightning strike, thunder storm, vehicular manslaughter attack, etc.) which would kill and terrorize thousands of animals, circus performers and patrons alike.

Top Circus Terror Scenarios:

1. Gun-Related Massacre
2. Circus Tent Collapse
3. Vehicular Manslaughter Attack
4. Biological Outbreak

[Does not purport to be a complete list of circus-related terror scenarios]

Due to cell phone cameras and social media platforms (e.g. Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, etc.), a circus-related attack or so-called natural disaster will be witnessed by the entire world from numerous angles. Needless to say, the graphic images of the dead and dying would be used to terrorize the masses for years to come.

In what appears to be a sign of circus terror to come, it was reported on July 17, 2015, that a spooked circus elephant attacked a car after a circus employee beat the animal. Needless to say, the incident was likely staged in order to set the precedent for an animal attack post-circus terror attack.

Roughly a week later on July 23, 2015, it was reported that Peruvian police are investigating a circus-related grenade attack which wounded 11 people, mostly members of the audience. The incident was likely executed at the behest of the CIA in order to set the precedent for a for deadlier circus-related terror attack.

In what appears to be pre-circus terror programming, it was reported on August 3, 2015, that a man was killed after a thunder storm collapsed his tent in a Chicago suburb. The incident was likely staged or fabricated in order to set the precedent for ten-related terror at a circus.

A day later on August 4, 2015, 2 people were killed and dozens hospitalized in New Hampshire after a circus tent collapsed. Needless to say, the collapse was likely executed at the behest of the CIA in order to set the precedent for a far deadlier circus tent collapse involving Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey Circus.

Two days later on August 6, 2015, The Wire published a report entitled “Turning the Capture of a Terrorist into a Circus” which was evidently designed to associate circuses with terrorism just prior to a state-sponsored circus-related terror attack.

In what appears to be pre-Ohio circus terror programming, it was reported back on July 31, 2015, that this is the first year that people can openly carry weapons at Ohio fairs and festivals. Coincidentally, Ringling Bros. will be in Dayton (September 24-27), Cleveland (October 21-25), Toledo (October 29-November 1), and Youngstown (November 19-22) in 2015.

In what appears to be pre-Oregon eco-terrorist attack programming, it was reported back on July 29, 2015, that Greenpeace activists dangled from a bridge in Oregon to protest Shell Oil’s icebreaker that allegedly set sail from Portland for the Arctic.

Since Greenpeace is a CIA activist front, it can be deduced that the publicity stunt was nothing more than programming for an eco-terrorist-related terror attack in the state of Oregon. Coincidentally, Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey Circus will be in Portland from September 17-20, 2015.

Cecil the Lion Hoax
In order to raise the specter of animal-related death on an international level just prior to a shocking circus-related terror attack, a CIA-spawned hoax was created over the death of Cecil the lion. In short, Walter James Palmer from Minnesota reportedly shot and killed Cecil, one of Zimbabwe’s most beloved lions. What ensued was a contrived uproar which was led by the CIA-run media, regardless of the fact that 20-million animals are slaughtered daily and millions more experimented on at zoos around the world. Nevertheless, to add even more fuel to the Cecil fire, it was reported on August 1, 2015, that Cecil’s brother Jericho was also shot dead in a Zimbabwe park. A day later on August 2, 2015, a second American man was accused of poaching an African lion. That same day, August 2, 2015, the Empire State Building in New York’s Empire was lit up with endangered animals. Two days later on August 4, 2015, Delta and American Airlines banned the transport of big-game trophies. Needless to say, the temporary ban was instituted in order to draw even more attention to dead animals just prior to a circus-related terror attack which kills hundreds more. Lastly, in order to rehash the death of Cecil one last time, it was reported on August 8, 2015, that the cub of Cecil the lion was killed by a rival male in Zimbabwe. Needless to say, these reports, most of which were blatantly fabricated, have psychologically programmed the public for an animal-related terror attack, most likely at a circus or zoo.

FLASHBACK: Indiana State Fair Stage Collapse
Back on August 13, 2015, a stage collapsed at the Indiana State Fair during outdoor concert by Sugarland. According to video footage and witnesses, a gust of wind from an approaching severe thunderstorm hit the stage’s temporary roof structure, causing it to collapse. The structure landed among a crowd of spectators, killing 7 people and injuring 58 others. Consequently, a redux stage-related collapse or fire involving a circus may now be in order.

MattShizzle #fundie rationalresponders.com

It's insane to say someone should be punished with a baby just for having sex. I personally don't have a problem with infanticide as long as it's the parents/mother doing it up to maybe age 2. Abstinence is utterly unacceptable to nearly any normal person. I see no problem euthanizing anyone in a situation where they are at an infants ability to reason and/or function. I certainly wish someone would have enough mercy to kill me if I was in that situation. People seem to have this unhealthy obsession with protecting babies. Guess what? The species is way overpopulated now - we don't need to worry about dying out barring a freak disaster (ie large meteor strike) or doing something stupid like nuclear or biological war.

Dr. Lorraine Day #racist goodnewsaboutgod.com

"Very few people realize that the Zionist Jewish version of the “Holocaust”, what the revisionists refer to as the Holocaust Hoax, is the CENTERPIECE of the Zionist Jews’ Plan to destroy all nations, control the entire world, slaughter most of the population of the earth [...]

The covert goal of the World Health Organization is to decrease the population in all countries of the world, especially the third world, by 1) vaccinations that CAUSE rather than prevent disease, 2) forced birth control, abortion and sterilization, 3) manufactured famines by weather control (creation of droughts), terminator seeds (seeds that don’t produce seeds), and withholding of meaningful medical care during pandemics, such as the AIDS pandemic in Africa...

metabuxx #psycho #sexist #pratt incels.co

[RageFuel] "Just get out of your basement inkwell"

Never fall for this. ITS A TRAP. Being born as a non Chad is a curse and all non Chads should take every necessary precaution to avoid being seen publicly.

By getting out of your coping area you are exposing yourself to further embarrassment and humiliation. They want you to get out so they can laugh at your subhumanity.
You are giving a chance to holes, normies and simps to make fun of your hideous face.
White knights and feminists see this a perfect opportunity to beat you, falsely accuse you of rape and get you locked up for having the audacity to breathe in the same air M'ladies were breathing.
You are giving Chads the pleasure of mogging you in every way possible into oblivion.
Every single person present around you only wishes for you death and nothing else. They'll spit on your face and piss on your grave and the world will praise them for doing so. Why risk going out into the gynocentric world when you can happily LDAR in your favorite coping spot.

Roosh #fundie rooshv.com

I’ve had a front-row seat in the culture war for over a decade, but I haven’t made any big policy declarations like other movements. Men’s rights activists their “family law reform” platform. The MGTOW group has “legalize prostitution and invent realistic sex bots.” The alt right has “white ethno-state.” The alt lite has “civic nationalism.” When it comes to policy, I’ve been quiet, solely focusing on fostering truth and masculinity. Only now am I ready to make the commitment to a policy platform which nips the essential problem in the bud in a way that other movements do not. We must repeal women’s suffrage, starting with the 19th Amendment in the United States. Once this is accomplished, no other planned or conscious action must be taken to solve nearly all our societal ills.

...

Today’s problems are all branches of a radical leftist root that has been normalized through feminism, social justice, and socialism. Allowing women to vote has made it effortless to elect leftist politicians who hate the family unit, men, and healthy market competition, while simultaneously weakening society by pushing women into work and giving them generous welfare in the form of handouts to single moms and the able-bodied along with make-work jobs for females in bloated government bureaucracies.

Thanks to leftism, we have seen the rise of a techno-matriarchy with an agenda of male disempowerment and persecution that transfers resources and soft power from men to women while solidifying hard power among elite globalists who control it all to uphold their own high-level aims. Individual globalists work together as an oligarchy to enact a divide-and-conquer strategy among races and sexes to fund leftist causes, politicians, and NGOs. The group with the most money to influence “democratic” politics and public opinion implants their useful idiots and political puppets to maintain control.

These puppets, whether on the “right” or “left,” have a true center on the left end of the spectrum for the sheer reason that votes from women must be gained. The manosphere cannon has shown that women have special mental faculties that operate almost exclusively on emotion, submission, and social conflict more than logic, dominance, and merit. Western countries have transformed into a national representation of the female psyche.

...

To appease female voters and their destructive nature of promiscuity and drama, a symptom of which is collectively propelling a book about a woman being brutally dominated by a man (50 Shades Of Grey) to one of the best selling books of all time, society has veered so far to the left that it is crumbling at its base through declining birth rates and collapse of the family unit. Because we have given women suffrage, it has become necessary to gain their votes by promising whatever they want in the moment, including the removal of all gates to the sexual market so they can engage in the great game of “alpha male hunting,” which has led to such unbridled chaos and sterility that we have to import third-world people as these empowered female voters abort nearly 60 million American babies. The demographic crisis the West faces today is primarily due to allowing women to do as they please instead of imposing healthy standards on their behavior and choices. The direct cause of this horror movie is giving women the vote.

I haven’t even touched the surface of the problems we have today that stem from having to appeal to the female vote: lowering of academic standards in universities to allow them to “excel,” promotion of degeneracy in media, invention of apps and technology to allow frictionless casual sex with bad boys, promotion of sex change operations among children, re-defining fat women as “beautiful at any size,” legalization of gay marriage, use of murder (abortion) as birth control, maligning normal masculinity as “toxic masculinity,” and elevation of damaging myths such as “rape culture” and the “wage gap” to foment gender fear and confusion. The culture has degraded because women have been at the forefront of degrading it. Their true nature, once unimpaired by societal limits, embarks on an tragic mission of destruction to recreate reality in a way to make them appear more attractive to high status men, no matter the consequence.

The problems I mentioned above would take thousands of local and Federal laws to address individually, and it would meet intense opposition from globalists who would fund the sort of antifascist protests and Deep State interference that we have seen thwarting Donald Trump. And even if those thousands of laws are passed, there is no guarantee that a renewed leftward push, thanks to ongoing demographic changes, wouldn’t roll them back. Is there a way to solve the problems while being assured that they couldn’t be repealed over the course of several generations? I’ve thought about this dilemma for years, after scratching the surface with previous thought experiments, and can only come to one conclusion: the problems in society can only be solved, and remain solved beyond one generation, by repealing women’s suffrage.

...

Take away the power of women to vote, and the degradation stops. The paltry population of male feminists, who are likely suffering from low testosterone due to environmental plastics, would offer no barrier in stopping the return to patriarchal normalcy. Women, helpless at enacting political change, would just whine and nag endlessly, and when they tire themselves out, they’d complete their protest by buying dildos or cats. Consider that no Democratic candidate for President since Jimmy Carter would have likely won if women were not allowed to vote. Upon repeal of women’s suffrage, a new party to the right of Republicans would be created as conservative men seek true conservatism and tradition.

Remove a woman’s right to vote and within just one national election, every single leftist party would be crushed. Within two elections, politicians would speak directly to men and their innate interest for patriarchy, economic success, stable families, and an equitable distribution of females among society. More than half of the candidates running for office would already be more conservative than Donald Trump, who is still liberal on social issues like equality and gay marriage.

Within three elections, the entirely of the liberal platform of the past 50 years would be rolled back, and the only living audience a woman can gain for her political opinions is from her feline friends. Within four elections, the global elite would be forced to retrench while sitting on billions of capital with no direct path of influence except sponsoring color revolutions and coups that can be defeated in the name of patriotic national defense. By then, the power of NGOs, media outlets, and day care universities will have declined. Within five elections, cultural standards would have tamed the sexual marketplace, and birth rates would rise once more as both women and men see the incentive in spending their free time building families instead of endlessly trying to secure a sex partner for the fleeting moment.

Repealing women’s suffrage would also diminish other dissident movements whose solutions can only bring temporary success as long as women have the right to vote. Men will automatically push laws that account for men’s rights. They will automatically regulate the sexual marketplace to make it more fair, diminishing MGTOW. They will automatically regulate immigration and replace it with a policy of natalism, diminishing the alt right. And they will automatically have high standards for citizenship, diminishing the alt lite.

Even the concept of masculinity will be built into the crust of society where only men have a political voice and not women. My game guides would no longer be needed, allowing me to buy land and operate a real farm instead of a content farm where most of my life has been spent pushing back the harmful effects that were unleashed after allowing women to vote. There will be no need for counter-cultural movements of men when those in charge of national politics only need to cater to male votes. If women’s suffrage is repealed, the most reviled dissident today would even be able to easily attain political office.

...

It should be clear to you that women will always use their votes to destroy themselves and their nations, to invite invaders with open legs, to persecute their own men, and to ravage their economies with socialism. Because they don’t operate on logic like men do, you will always have this destructive element within the political ranks of your nation as long as women have the right to vote. Giving them this right was a terrible mistake. I can now claim to have one political dream, and that is to repeal women’s suffrage. I will vote only for politicians who put me closer to realizing this necessary reality. Within my lifetime, I’m certain that at least one country, in an attempt to save itself, will elevate a barbarous and ferocious strongman to fulfill this task, and he will have my full support, because repealing women’s suffrage is the only issue of our day that can single-handedly solve all the others.

Neil G. #fundie talkorigins.org

Let's suppose for a moment that evolution is true and verifiable (scientifically speaking). I would have to believe that we as humans have been inhibiting our progression as a species by our human efforts to eradicate disease, poverty and war. These conditions which we see as enemies of civilization are the very elements that - if one believes in evolution, are meant to improve our genetic makeup and eventually change us acordingly. Disease wipes out inferior or week life forms...war eliminates those who are intellectually stunted and poverty allows the stronger to enslave the weaker. These are things that we (if one believes in evolution) must not be resisted in the quest for a higher and more advanced society. The elderly must be euthanized, the sick be exterminated and the poor must be sexualy sterilized and then enslaved to enrich the society of the priveleged.

....right out of the sick mind of some nihilistic "scientists" and philosophers, right? His name was Hitler.

For the record, I believe that the earth was created (designed) by the master designer himself...Jesus Christ.

John C. Wright #racist scifiwright.com

Especially effort will be made to kill the babies of Negroes in the womb, a race which all the Progressives hate and fear, so much so that they will not even call a black baby a “baby”, but instead call it a untermensch nigger fetus. The other thing they will do is attempt to promote artificial sterility via contraception, in order to demean the status of women and degrade the prudence and chivalry of men. Since the rhythm method is both more reliable than contraceptives, and produces neither breast cancer nor ground water contaminants as do hormonal contraceptives, it is decried and dismissed by the Progressives.

The World Should Change Because I Say It Should

If anyone wants to argue if this guy was not an eco-fundie, email Bite.Me@fstdt.net and your complaints will be addressed appropriately.

James J. Lee #fundie savetheplanetprotest.com

The Discovery Channel MUST broadcast to the world their commitment to save the planet and to do the following IMMEDIATELY:
1. The Discovery Channel and it's affiliate channels MUST have daily television programs at prime time slots based on Daniel Quinn's "My Ishmael" pages 207-212 where solutions to save the planet would be done in the same way as the Industrial Revolution was done, by people building on each other's inventive ideas. Focus must be given on how people can live WITHOUT giving birth to more filthy human children since those new additions continue pollution and are pollution. A game show format contest would be in order. Perhaps also forums of leading scientists who understand and agree with the Malthus-Darwin science and the problem of human overpopulation. Do both. Do all until something WORKS and the natural world starts improving and human civilization building STOPS and is reversed! MAKE IT INTERESTING SO PEOPLE WATCH AND APPLY SOLUTIONS!!!!

2. All programs on Discovery Health-TLC must stop encouraging the birth of any more parasitic human infants and the false heroics behind those actions. In those programs' places, programs encouraging human sterilization and infertility must be pushed. All former pro-birth programs must now push in the direction of stopping human birth, not encouraging it.

3. All programs promoting War and the technology behind those must cease. There is no sense in advertising weapons of mass-destruction anymore. Instead, talk about ways to disassemble civilization and concentrate the message in finding SOLUTIONS to solving global military mechanized conflict. Again, solutions solutions instead of just repeating the same old wars with newer weapons. Also, keep out the fraudulent peace movements. They are liars and fakes and had no real intention of ending the wars. ALL OF THEM ARE FAKE! On one hand, they claim they want the wars to end, on the other, they are demanding the human population increase. World War II had 2 Billion humans and after that war, the people decided that tripling the population would assure peace. WTF??? STUPIDITY! MORE HUMANS EQUALS MORE WAR!

4. Civilization must be exposed for the filth it is. That, and all its disgusting religious-cultural roots and greed. Broadcast this message until the pollution in the planet is reversed and the human population goes down! This is your obligation. If you think it isn't, then get hell off the planet! Breathe Oil! It is the moral obligation of everyone living otherwise what good are they??

5. Immigration: Programs must be developed to find solutions to stopping ALL immigration pollution and the anchor baby filth that follows that. Find solutions to stopping it. Call for people in the world to develop solutions to stop it completely and permanently. Find solutions FOR these countries so they stop sending their breeding populations to the US and the world to seek jobs and therefore breed more unwanted pollution babies. FIND SOLUTIONS FOR THEM TO STOP THEIR HUMAN GROWTH AND THE EXPORTATION OF THAT DISGUSTING FILTH! (The first world is feeding the population growth of the Third World and those human families are going to where the food is! They must stop procreating new humans looking for nonexistant jobs!)

6. Find solutions for Global Warming, Automotive pollution, International Trade, factory pollution, and the whole blasted human economy. Find ways so that people don't build more housing pollution which destroys the environment to make way for more human filth! Find solutions so that people stop breeding as well as stopping using Oil in order to REVERSE Global warming and the destruction of the planet!

7. Develop shows that mention the Malthusian sciences about how food production leads to the overpopulation of the Human race. Talk about Evolution. Talk about Malthus and Darwin until it sinks into the stupid people's brains until they get it!!

8. Saving the Planet means saving what's left of the non-human Wildlife by decreasing the Human population. That means stopping the human race from breeding any more disgusting human babies! You're the media, you can reach enough people. It's your resposibility because you reach so many minds!!!

9. Develop shows that will correct and dismantle the dangerous US world economy. Find solutions for their disasterous Ponzi-Casino economy before they take the world to another nuclear war.

10. Stop all shows glorifying human birthing on all your channels and on TLC. Stop Future Weapons shows or replace the dialogue condemning the people behind these developments so that the shows become exposes rather than advertisements of Arms sales and development!

11. You're also going to find solutions for unemployment and housing. All these unemployed people makes me think the US is headed toward more war.

Humans are the most destructive, filthy, pollutive creatures around and are wrecking what's left of the planet with their false morals and breeding culture.

For every human born, ACRES of wildlife forests must be turned into farmland in order to feed that new addition over the course of 60 to 100 YEARS of that new human's lifespan! THIS IS AT THE EXPENSE OF THE FOREST CREATURES!!!! All human procreation and farming must cease!

It is the responsiblity of everyone to preserve the planet they live on by not breeding any more children who will continue their filthy practices. Children represent FUTURE catastrophic pollution whereas their parents are current pollution. NO MORE BABIES! Population growth is a real crisis. Even one child born in the US will use 30 to a thousand times more resources than a Third World child. It's like a couple are having 30 babies even though it's just one! If the US goes in this direction maybe other countries will too!

Also, war must be halted. Not because it's morally wrong, but because of the catastrophic environmental damage modern weapons cause to other creatures. FIND SOLUTIONS JUST LIKE THE BOOK SAYS! Humans are supposed to be inventive. INVENT, DAMN YOU!!

The world needs TV shows that DEVELOP solutions to the problems that humans are causing, not stupify the people into destroying the world. Not encouraging them to breed more environmentally harmful humans.

Saving the environment and the remaning species diversity of the planet is now your mindset. Nothing is more important than saving them. The Lions, Tigers, Giraffes, Elephants, Froggies, Turtles, Apes, Raccoons, Beetles, Ants, Sharks, Bears, and, of course, the Squirrels.

The humans? The planet does not need humans.

You MUST KNOW the human population is behind all the pollution and problems in the world, and YET you encourage the exact opposite instead of discouraging human growth and procreation. Surely you MUST ALREADY KNOW this!

I want Discovery Communications to broadcast on their channels to the world their new program lineup and I want proof they are doing so. I want the new shows started by asking the public for inventive solution ideas to save the planet and the remaining wildlife on it.

These are the demands and sayings of Lee.

Robertredgreen #fundie reddit.com

Shaden_Freud_e:

ITT i shall argue that an atheistic society destroys social darwinism and eugenics by; Promoting low birth rates trough supporting birth control and gay rights Opposing any form of warfare Allowing the poor to thrive and seeking to limit the power of the rich All this amounts to a dysgenic society.

Atheism doesn't require any of that.
Promoting low birth rates trough supporting birth control and gay rights

Pro-eugenics groups have historically been in favor of low birth rates for undesirable demographics, so that's a bit simplistic. They sterilized a number of black people, Hispanics, Native Americans, and poorer white women in the US, while also demanding that middle- and upper-class women bear many children to prevent "race suicide".
By the way, it's not like we need more people on this planet right now.
Opposing any form of warfare

Warfare right now is no longer as reliant on genetics. You don't need to be physically healthy to launch a missile or call in a drone strike. I also don't see how generally being averse to war is a bad thing, as long as you can get involved when it's necessary. Your genetics also can't save you from getting hit by an IED in some hellhole.
Allowing the poor to thrive and seeking to limit the power of the rich

Oh, no, not equality! If you're looking for the best to rise, then fucking over most people in favor of the guys with some cash isn't the way to go. You think the rich are limited right now when they can bribe their way into top schools and get a born advantage to everyone?
This argument is pretty trash, and I fear for a society that you desire.

Robertredgreen:
I STAND by no inequality. The rich havebeen denied their due status and villified all across the media. I notice you said"hellhole" Is the great nation of afghanistan,who teaches usa how to treat women,a "hellhole"? Is DETROIT a hellhole? I stand by the third world. The first world is anti eugeni

Shaden_Freud_e:

I STAND by no inequality. The rich havebeen denied their due status and villified all across the media. I notice you said"hellhole" Is the great nation of afghanistan,who teaches usa how to treat women,a "hellhole"? Is DETROIT a hellhole? I stand by the third world. The first world is anti eugeni

Funny, isn't it, that you decided not to address the majority of the argument. The rich have their status and they can get away with literal murder. Don't you deserve to be vilified if you can cheat your way into Yale on Daddy's dime? And are you trolling by saying Afghanistan is the best exemplar of how to treat women, or are you a misogynistic asshole?

We should be extremely wary of eugenics, given its track record, unless you're really into involuntary sterilization, pressuring other women to bear kids, and Nazism. Wouldn't surprise me if you were, but.

Robertredgreen:
No,you do not. Learn to accept others good luck. I Embrace afgaghnistan. Take the black pill. You call me an asshole but im defending you from thots who will cheat on you for another man I dont have any hard words for nazism. Sterilization is bad because even the poor must breed.

Jog Mansen #fundie incels.co

Why Pol Pot was a Hero to Incels

Pol Pot was the best example of how to purge and repress degeneracy in the modern age post ww2, all of the party members of his Regime were literal subhumans and yet they enslaved all of the whores and starved them to death which is exactly what they fucking deserve in three years he killed 15% of his country, Foids needed permission from the state to have kids or marry and anyone who even kissed without permission would be beat to death, this is the best way to prevent degeneracy and why Pol Pot should be considered an Incel hERo

metabuxx #sexist #psycho incels.co

[RageFuel] Imagine 50 men and 50 women are stranded on an island after a violent sea storm.

They are out of resources so they would have to cooperate together for survival until help arrives.

Now imagine that out of those 50 men, 5 are Chads. What do you think is gonna happen? Each one of those 50 women will be fucking Chads for the rest of their days on the island while the other 45 men will be rotting alone. Holes will be like - "Its just a preference sweaty. Why don't you go fix the ship while I suck Chad's dick"

Do you see this island functioning at all? What incentive would these men have to contribute to the island's economy? Why the fuck would they even contribute? Just so that those holes and Chads can fuck without any worry.

And if you can't see this island functioning then how do you expect the society to function. A society where millions of women are dying to be a part of Chad's harems while their looksmatches are rotting in their basement. JFL at this cucked society.

We'd enslave the whores and make chads build ships

based thing to do

the other men would just kill the chads and redistribute the foids with the 5 left out used for being raped by anyone

Rapemaxing is the only way for sub-8 men to ascend

I think there was a show similar to this.
what ended up happening was the Chads didnt do anything (okay they did hunt once or twice) and fucked any woman they wanted. all the women didn't help in any serious way (they would fucking gather firewood/driftwood and shit that fell off the trees) and eat all the food and complain about everything then the average guys did 90% of the work. building stuff. cooking the food. making shelter. gathering food and resources.

The girls that were not good enough for Chad would find a beta male and fuck him and live in his hut and get free resources. but that was only 2-3 guys. All Chads fucked. All girls fucked. 2-3 average guys fucked. The rest rotted away BUT STILL HAD TO CONTRIBUTE to the group otherwise the women would call him a pig and sully his name to the rest of the group. then he would be outcast. So even though they were literally getting NOT A SINGLE DAM THING from the group they still had to contribute otherwise be ousted. Hmmmmm...sorta like society, eh?

(And to be fair I never watched the show. I ended up reading an article on it that some MGTOW youtube channel had posted)

Utterly brutal. Exact replica of the modern society.

I would take down the other men at night and have all the womens to myself

You must be a gymcel but I'm going to ask anyway
Realistically, how many women could you beat up at once?

Reason I ask is because if you kill all the Chads the women are not just going to let you fuck them willingly. They are going to revolt against you. Could you win against 10 women at once?

I'd probably gather a few based brocels and brutally murder chads, then rape the bitches (actually I think they'd just simply accept me submissively). I've seen this behavior among chimps btw.

nah man they would. Women are submissive. If even men act this way among alpha males despite clearly being able to kill him once let alone women who are naturally designed to avoid conflict.

Ill get a sharpened stick and start jabbing the ugly ones and the stronger women first. Then when they see i mean business theyll give up

Damn I didn't know you were a High-IQcel as well
you've thought about this scenario before lol

In a situation like this, are we assuming the same intellect or intellect inverse to looks?

In that case I think what you said above holds true for a few weeks/ months, but then the smartest normies and incels would start their own group, and go find a separate part of the island, and they would just cope there. They'd figure out more efficient ways to get food and other essential shit, meanwhile chad would fuck 7-8 foids a day, but eventually he'd get screwed cos he won't have evolved. Some Becky's would take the hint and move in with the normies (betabux) and eventually Stacy might go tell chad to bully the normies and incels to give them shit, but by this time you'd have a group of 20 high IQ normies incels made one 'state' 5 chads and medium IQ normies in another, so the 5 chads won't be able to do shit to the incels, it's quite likely incels will develop weapons too, so then chad dies out, but presumably they already impregnated the Stacies .

Incel state might send their highest T normies to go kill weakened/ dehydrated chad (ngl I knew a slayer who didn't know u can't drink seawater), and take the Stacies, and then they will kill chads spawn.

Fucking based prediction. This way they could emerge as winners without even rapemaxing. Even the simps in the group would support it.

CH #sexist heartiste.wordpress.com

Was it the (((propaganda)))? The Pill? The refined factory-made carbs? The SCALE? The sexual market chaos? The enabling thirsty betas? The Diversity™?

Maybe all of the above. Whatever the foul source, our women are flying off a cliffside with a vengeance, and taking their homelands with them. We either collar them, or allow them to continue steering the ship straight into the rocky shoals.

WILL YOU MAKE YOUR DECISION FOR THE PATRIARCHY?

***

Anonymous probes,

Why, prey tell, Mr. Heartiste, do you think this girl on some Alpha’s boat aping him by wearing his hat flew off the cliff?

Take a few minutes and peruse your former GF’s on facebook to see what became of them.

I don’t. It hurts too much to see the wreckage wrought.

I get you. Alpha widowhood and its cuntsequences are another feature of a recklessly liberated sexual market. The detritus of damaged thots.

David James #fundie eurofolkradio.com

Why Did Jews Create Pornography?

Ladies and Gentlemen, I think you should watch this film so that you will have a deeper understanding of how our enemy, the Jew operates. This despicable people have done the same things over and over to our people for thousands of years. We can, and must learn from the examples of History and our mistakes. What you see in our countries today is nothing new. The Jews are destroying the moral fabric of our societies and are causing us and our children great harm.

When you look at the condition of America today, you are actually seeing what happened to Germany in the 1920s. If you study that historical period, you will understand where we are, and where we are headed. Our people will be eating out of garbage cans and fat Jews will mock us while we starve. These very conditions caused World War 2. Notice that this takes place after World War 1. This is the very reason the Jews cause wars and keep our countries in perpetual war. They make money off the wars, steal all the properties and businesses, control the wealth, change the laws, promote degeneracy and this list could go on all day.

This little film has some nudity in it but, it is important to understand that the Jews use our feelings as a weapon against us. They use sex, drugs, music, news stories, films, hatred, television, parties, games, politics and many, many more things to sway us one way or another. Your feelings can become dangerous to you and others if not kept in check. You will see in this film the confirmation of the things I just mentioned.

You see, your feelings are a way to manipulate you. In the film, the Germans are kept in their homes with a curfew. They practically have no choice but the Talmudvision to get information. The Jews play porn on all 3 stations…What is the purpose you say? The purpose is to poison the peoples minds with contrived realities and the monkey see, monkey do principle. Children are subject to this all the time on Talmudvision. They see a guy with tattoos and piercings and they say…that’s cool. Some of them will believe it is a reality and enact upon it, getting tattoos and piercings thus disobeying Yahweh and causing themselves harm for years to come. The crazy thing is that the guy on Talmudvision may not have had any REAL tattoos or piercings at all. Another way to contrive realities that lure the young to their deaths is to have an actor or rock star pretend that they are gay. The children have been taught that these people should be their idols. They then try to be like their idols in every way. Though the rock star or actor is not truly gay, the child believes it and becomes it and voila….there’s your contrived reality.

One more thing. Notice how the word FREEDOM is used in this video, it is the key to understanding something which is extremely important.

Why Did Jews Create Pornography?

These are only some of the examples that I could present to you. Hopefully you get the message and the understanding of how these filthy Jews work. We must become Jew savvy and warn our children how they operate. May Yahweh save our children from these horrible Demonic wolves!

Yet, one more thing…I got an email about the fact that the video mentions the Catholic church as the only true religion. Well, I figured you all know that the Catholic church is a Satanic entity, which is part of part of Mystery Babylon. I hoped you would automatically disregard the foolish nonsense about the Catholic church. Evidently I was wrong! Take Notice! Disregard the comment about the Catholic church being the only true religion for it is an harlot and totally against Yahweh The Most High! There< That settles that!

Incels Wiki #racist #sexist incels.wiki

Anglo girls

Anglo girls are amongst the worst girls on the planet. Essentially every common characteristic attributed to American women within the Manosphere can also be applied to Anglo girls.

Cluster-B

They generally have a highly anti-social, narcissistic and rude attitude and seem to speak in a language composed entirely of sarcasm, pop culture references and shit tests. The majority follow the American model of riding the Cock Carousel through their teens and twenties, before settling down with a Beta male once they hit the wall. A lot of Anglo girls lose their virginity in their early teen years before hitting sixteen.

Particularly Promiscuous

In particular, according to a survey conducted by the condom manufacturer Durex, women from New Zealand are the most promiscuous in the world with an average of 20.4 sexual partners, compared to men from New Zealand averaging just 16.8. (It is important to note, women have been demonstrated to lie about their number of sexual partners, even in anonymous surveys, thus this is most likely an underestimate.) [1] Thus it appears that they are not only the most promiscuous, but among the most prone to hypergamy to boot.

The thirst of most of the men in the Anglosphere means that any girl who slim is viewed as 'fit' and she will be guaranteed to have an army of thirsty orbiters fawning over her. This thirst causes even the most fat, unattractive women to believe that they are entitled to a high sexual market value man.

Particularly Feminist

Women in the Anglosphere typically hold strong feminist attitudes even if they refuse to use the label, and are successful in enforcing their demands on the men of the Anglosphere (typically bluepilled simps); for example Canada is apparently "the vasectomy capital of the world" [2] where "more women here (Canada) rely on male sterilization for contraception than in any other country surveyed."

Women in the Anglosphere, particularly Australian women are also notorious for their uncouth behavior, which includes a tendency for public drunkenness and urination.

Cock Carousel

Women now outnumber men at British universities, and spend their time of 'self realization' riding the cock carousel with the bad boys on campus, wasting taxpayer money studying useless social science degrees, before either ending up in a dead end office job and finding a Captain Save A Ho to bail them out, or becoming a career focused, strong independent woman, unable to hold down a stable relationship post wall, which leads to them becoming unhappy spinsters who have missed their ability to fulfill their biological imperative of having a family.

For example, Australian women have the oldest age at first birth (if they deign to have any children at all) at 30.5 years old[3] with the U.K close behind (30) which will surely result in skyrocketing rates of autism in those countries, resulting in a large pool of likely incels being created.[4]

References

[1] http://www.stuff.co.nz/life-style/22444/Kiwi-women-most-promiscuous-in-the-world
[2] https://www.macleans.ca/news/canada/are-we-blushing-yet/
[3] https://www.nationmaster.com/country-info/stats/People/Mother%27s-mean-age-at-first-birth
[4] https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#44.6.25_of_high_functioning_adult_autistic_men_remain_virgins.2C_despite_high_sex.2Frelationship_drive

See Also

* femoid
* iceland

ViralCel #sexist #racist #psycho incels.co

Magicels: The Blackpilling (CARDCELS GTFIH)

Hello there and welcome to my card making cope thread. Will update when I have more ideas, open to feedback and suggestions.

Inspired by Bufophiliac og post:
image

Transcript(several spoof Magic The Gathering cards:
“Balding Indian Janitor” - 1 Any, 1 Green - Creature - Subhuman Incel - Misogyny 2 (Whenever this creature blocks or becomes blocked by a Foid, this creature gets +2/+2 until end of turn) - “Show bobs and vagene.” - 2/2
“St. BlackOps2Cel” - 2 White, 1 Any - Creature - Subhuman Incel - Indestructible; Other Subhumans get +1/+1 and have protections from Foids, Normies, and Cucks. - “Come unto me, all ye that labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest.” - 1/1
-“The Supreme Gentleman” - 1 White, 1 Red - Land Creature – Subhuman Incel - Misogyny 3; Whenever a Foid enters the battlefield, put a Rejection counter on The Supreme Gentleman; 1 Red, 1 White, Tap, Remove three Rejection counters from The Supreme Gentleman and sacrifice him: Destroyup to five target creatures. - “I don’t know what your problem is, girls.”
“Slaying Queen” - 2 Black, 2 Any - Creature - Human Foid - Whenever Slaying Queen blocks or gets blocked by a Chad or Tyrone, exile that creature and place a black 1⁄1 Spawn creature onto the battlefield - Someone gotta take responsibility for these kids” - ⅔
“The Rope” - 3 Any - Artifact - 1 Any, Tap, sacrifice a subhuman: You draw two cards and gain 5 life. “The ultimate cope, and our only hope. A permanent solution to a permanent problem”
“Gymcel Manlet” - 2 White, 3 Any - Creature – Subhuman Incel - Overcompensate - 1 White, 3 Any (1 White 3 Any: This creature becomes a Human Nomrie until end of turn.); Whenever Gymcel Manlet overcompensates, put a +1/+1 counter on Gymcel Manlet. - ¾
“Nerdy Guy” - 3 Any 2 Blue - Creature - Human Chad - When Nerdy Guy enters the battlefield, gain control of target foid. - “Silly Incels, you know noting about women. Just look at my boyfriend, he’s a total nerd!! Tee-hee!”
“Surgerymaxxing Hopefuls” 1 Red, 3 Fire - Creature - Subhuman Incel - Overcompensate - 1 Red 1 Any; Whenever Surgerymaxxing Hopefuls overcompensates, flip a coin. If you win the filp. put a +1/+1 counter on Surgerymaxxing Hopefuls, otherwise remove a +1/+1 counter from Surgerymaxxing Hopefuls. Then, if Surgerymaxxing Hopefulls has three or more +1/+1 counters on it, sacrifice Surgerymaxxing Hopefuls and put two 5⁄5 white Human Chad creature tokens onto the battlefield. - 2⁄2.
“Tinder” - 3 Any 3 Red - Enchantment - All Foids get +2/+2.; Subhumans cannot attack or block, and their activated abilities cannot be played. - “It’s Over”
“Soy Boy” - 2 Any 1 Green- Creature . Human Cuck - Male Feminist (Preven all damage this creature woould deal to Foids.). “I would appreciate if you left me and my wife’s son alone.”

Latest expansion:
imageimageimageimageimageimageimageimageimageimage

Transcript”NEET Squad” - 7 Any - Creature - Human Incel - This spell costs 1 Mana less to cast for each Normie or Cuck on the battlefield. NEET Squad’s power and toughness are each equal to the number of untapped Incels you control. - “Can’t beat the NEET.” - */*.
“NPC” - 1 Any - Creature - Human Normie - NPC can’t attack or block alone. NPC gets +1/+1 for each other creature in play named NPC. - “if (offended=true) say “normie platitudes”;” - 1⁄1.
“The Blackpill” - 3 Any 3 Black - Legendary Enchantment - The Blackpill can’t be countered. All Humans you control are now Incels in addition to their other subtypes. All Incels in your control get +2/+2 and gain vigilance. - “It never began.”
“Juggernaut Law” - 2 Any 3 Black or Red - Enchantment - All Foid creatures with power 4 or less have haste. All Foid creatures with power 3 or less have trample. All Foid creatures with power 2 or less can’t be blocked. - “You can’t keep a woman’s dating potential down. She is unstoppable. Any flaws she has, just make her stronger.”
“Lay Down And Rot” - 2 Any 1 Black - Sorcery - Target creature gets -3/-3 until end of turn. Put a -1/-1 counter on it. - “Tour’s over boyo, time to ldar.”
“Wagecuck” - 2 Any 2 Green - Creature - Human Normie - Tap. Put a -1/-1 counter on this creature and put 1 Mana in your Mana pool. It becomes a Cuck until the end of yor turn. Tap: Remove a -1/-1 counter from this creature and draw a card. - “W- Would you like fries with that, sir?” - 4⁄2
“Fakeup” - 1 Red 1 Green - Target Foid gets +5/+0 and gains haste until end of turn. - “I don’t wear makeup for men, I do it for myself.
“Trucel” - 2 Any 1 Blue 1 White - Creature - Subhuman Incel - Defender; Return any Foid that would fight this creature to its owner’s hand instead. - “Be honest guys, is it over for me?” - 0⁄10
“Betabuxxer” - 2 Any 1 White 1 Blue - Creature - Human Cuck - Tap: The next Foid spell you cast this turn costs 2 Mana less to cast. Male Feminist - “Happy wife happy life!”
“Online Dating Service” - 1 Any 1 Red 1 Black - Artifact - 1 Mana, Tap: Reveal the top card of your library. If it’s a Chad card, put the card into your hand. If it’s a Human card, you may put that card into your hand. If it’s a Subhuman card, exile it. - “Just put yourself out there, bro!”

Bill Donohue #fundie catholicleague.org

The quest for autonomy has reached such a macabre level in the Netherlands that last year the Royal Dutch Medical Association expanded the list of conditions legalizing euthanasia to include “loneliness.”

In the state of Washington, a debate is currently raging over whether to expand the list of conditions legalizing euthanasia to include those who are not terminally ill, as well as those who are mentally disabled.

By contrast, this week in Tennessee a dog was rescued from being euthanized (one news outlet said he was being spared “the Gas Chamber”) because the condition driving the dog’s death was his alleged homosexuality (the owner was ticked when he saw his Fido hunch another male dog). For reasons that appear entirely reasonable, the gal who rescued the dog named him Elton [click here to read the story].

The place where Elton was dropped, Euthanasia Jackson TN, encourages dog adoption, but it also promotes dog euthanasia. Not, however, in Elton’s case: the shelter has no stomach for putting dogs down on the basis of sexual orientation. It must be said, though, that the shelter is not exactly inclusive in its policies. To wit: Had poor Elton not been identified as a homosexual, his heterosexuality would not have been enough to save his hide.

The moral of the story is: Being gay is not only a bonus for humans these days, it is a definite plus for dogs as well. As for straights, the lonely and the disabled, that’s another story altogether.

various incels #sexist reddit.com

(FlowerEmperor)
Chad friend told me about how he pisses on girls in the shower

He said he pisses on girls while they're showering together to see how much he can get away with. Apparently his current girlfriend expressed annoyance at it at first but then stopped showing a reaction. He also bragged about pissing unnanounced on other girls in the past. This guy has women all over him and hooks up left right and centre even when he has a girlfriend.
REMEMBER: You are incel because you don't respect women.

(spiritplumber)
Pee on him, establish dominance.

(RapeAFeminist4Jesus)
Chad
shower

.
.
.

Checks out.

(hot_young_dude)
Obviously he realises the worth of modern females, just like a lot of other Chads do. It seems normies are usually the most delusional. Let's look on the bright side: at least someone pisses on these whores.

(HomoheroBishii)
Females consider it an honor to be pissed on unannounced by Chad. Whatever it takes to keep him around for one more minute. It also turns the submissive ones on (which is most women when they're around Chad).
An ugly beta smiling at them is considered an insult and should be illegal.

(incelwarrior95)
chad gets way with anything

(fart_fetish)
Maybe if Chad pees on me I will become attractive

(LynchingTriHards)
GEEEEEEEEEE I WONDER WHYYYYYYYY I DON'T HAVE ANY GIRLS EVEN THOUGH I TOOK A SHOWER JUST THEN??????
WELL NORMFAGS??????

(BrigandEileen)
In other news, stare rape needs to stop.

(NutNotBusted)
Golden showers are a must for femaloids, they love being degraded by Chad

(King69Alex)
Just marking my territory.

(mysterixx)
Chads are narcissistic assholes and they will anything just because they can do. I know many of them beating women and still get away with it.

(MarriedAndLookin4Fun)
Who else pisses on themselves while showering?
Only me? Okay

(pepefrog100)
Pee on my bum bum chadley

(dindu_nuffin_dontBan)
I've done this too it's hilarious.

(Donewithitall7766)
Someone please make a weaponized blackpill tinder account with golden shower fetish and show these femaloids they only care about face and no regard for levels of degeneracy when it comes to Chad.

(Bojack101)
Ultimate blakcpill

(Mest666)
pic?

kalki666 #racist lordkalki.wordpress.com

Invasion of the prostate snatchers!

Every 25 minutes, a man is diagnosed with prostate cancer. The discovery will turn his life upside down and bring heartache and fear to him and his family.

He will face a bewildering array of treatments from which he, not his doctor, will have to choose. He will suffer years of uncertainty about his future. His sex life may suffer or disappear as surgery or drugs take away his libido.

Yet, in the U.S. only 95 of 100,000 inhabitants, in Europe only 40 in 100,000 people, and in Asian countries only 4 in 100,000 people develop prostate cancer.

[...]

The whole ‘prostate cancer’ thing is one big ZOG scam! They incessantly scare the public about an affliction that is statistically next to non-existant! With the ultimate goal being sterilization (Morganthau Plan, revisited), after they repeatedly rape and humiliate you! All under the guise of ‘we’re helping you’! Filthy Jew bastards! It’s such a shame that Hitler didn’t get to finish the job!

Tentacle Grape #sexist steamcommunity.com

I'm calling it

these anti-pedo white knights are actually OLD HAGS behind their monitors. they cannot attract that 6-digit per month earning alpha male that only have their eyes on those fresh young teen girls. they use pedoshaming tactics to shame men in the hopes that they could steer their attention at them. in vain I'll add.

they want attention too you know! they want the lion's share! they want their bills paid! they want men to pay for them and give NOTHING in exchange.

or they are simps and manginas.

savagesusie #conspiracy freerepublic.com

I think you are right. Giving healthy children a cocktail of toxins-—and all vaccinations have known toxins in them-—has to affect the babies in particular. We used to NEVER give vaccinations to children under 6 mos. of age.

These pediatricians who mandate newborn vaccinations to healthy infants should be put in prison.

The Bill Gates crowd—think there are a few too many billion people in the world and sterilization through vaccines would be the best method to save the planet. Of course, getting Autism helps prevent marriage and families also-—what a coincidence.

Just look at the amount and timing of vaccinations in the 70’s and then in the 90’s. All that toxin being injected into toddlers is a crime. They can’t excrete it at young ages and the toxins attack the neurons in the brain. There is a correlation because Autism became epidemic after the schedule of vaccines were upped and the age lowered in children.

LittleBoy #sexist incels.co

[Blackpill] The future of dating & mating as a sub 8 PSL: Glorified Betabuxxing & Simpmaxing

Going on a date. Forget it unless you pay for her dinner & dessert. Oh. Also her time cause she's got better things to do as a foid.

Sex. Forget it unless you either pay for condom & lubricant & her "services" as we all say all foids are whores so she'll charge for that even if she isn't.

Bareback it'll be 2 courses of PrEP alongside some antibiotics alongside testing alongside birth control etc...

Being a baby momma. That's surrogacy costs/ lost earnings for 2 months of her wages, baby items (that's okay I suppose), paternity testing, accommodation, food etc...

So guys. As a sub 8 psl man prepare to get rinsed financially...

While over at meeksville... Women are simping for him... fucking. Unbelievable...

The Voice of Reason #sexist thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com

A libertarian state should give sluts the rope to hang themselves.

A libertarian state would not presume to stop sluts from disposing of their unwanted babies either before or after birth.

Sluts are the agents of illegitimacy and therefore the agents of degeneracy and corruption.

If promiscuous women are seen to be ones frequently killing their babies because they are too stupid, careless and lazy to practise effective contraception, then in time they will come to be ostracised by society.

Currently, Western men are terrified of offending sluts.

Remember, sluts are fornicatresses who are the agents of illegitimacy and therefore the agents of degeneracy and corruption, who will destroy your civilisation with their promiscuity and inability to practise effective contraception. Sluts are stupid too. If you are a bastard, then half your genes are full of stupid slut genes, and the other half full of the genes of an MCSF (Morally-Compromised Slut-Fucker). What would happen to your country if most of your countrymen and countrywomen are like that?

http://www.theguardian.com/society/2011/may/31/care-failing-those-with-learning-disability
"people with a learning disability, whose numbers are growing by up to 5% a year and who can require care and support costing a typical £1,500 a week" Most of the mothers of the learning disabled will be SSMs [Slut Single Mothers].

And still no British male politician will criticise the irrational and irresponsible reproductive choices of stupid sluts.

Svarog123 #fundie reddit.com

There is nothing inherently harmful or immoral about having sex with children CMV

There are a number of arguments used by proponents of the prevailing cultural mythology on the subject:

1. Children are psychologically damaged by sexual activity

Sex is an inherently pleasurable activity- the claim that children are inherently "harmed" or "traumatized" by sex is demonstrably false, supported by no scientific research, and is essentially absurd, as children are not asexual (a point I will address later).

"The self-reported effects data contradict the conclusions or implications presented in previous literature reviews that harmful effects stemming from CSA are pervasive and intense in the population of persons with this experience. Baker and Duncan (1985) found that, although some respondents reported permanent harm stemming from their CSA experiences (4% of males and 13% of females), the overwhelming majority did not (96% of males and 87% of females). Severe or intense harm would be expected to linger into adulthood, but this did not occur for most respondents in this national sample, according to their self-reports, contradicting the conclusion or implication of intense harm stemming from CSA in the typical case. Meta-analyses of CSA-adjustment relations from the five national studies that reported results of adjustment measures revealed a consistent pattern: SA respondents were less well adjusted than control respondents. Importantly, however, the size of this difference (i.e., effect size) was consistently small in the case of both males and females. The unbiased effect size estimate for males and females combined was ru = .08, which indicates that CSA, assuming that it was responsible for the adjustment difference between SA and control respondents, did not produce intense problems on average."

Rind, Bruce & Tromovitch, Philip (1997). "A meta-analytic review of findings from national samples on psychological correlates of child sexual abuse," Journal of Sex Research, 34, 237-255.

The Rind meta-analysis is peer-reviewed, and its conclusion has not been discredited to date.

Often, when psychological damage does occur, it is not the result of the act itself, but rather the result of society's reaction to it:

Nelson's relationship marked "the happiest period of [her] life." "When I was a child I experienced an ongoing incestuous relationship that seemed to me to be caring and beneficial in nature. There were love and healthy self-actualization in what I perceived to be a safe environment. Suddenly one day I discerned from playground talk at school that what I was doing might be "bad". Fearing that I might, indeed, be a "bad" person, I went to my mother for reassurance. The ensuing traumatic incidents of that day inaugurated a 30-year period of psychological and emotional dysfunction that reduced family communication to mere utilitarian process and established severe limits on my subsequent developmental journey."

Sexologist Joan A. Nelson in Children and Sex, on her relationship with an adult cousin at 8 years of age December, 1981

In other words, if the prevailing belief was not that having sex as a child is the worst thing that could possibly happen, psychological issues stemming from childhood sexual experience would lessen drastically.

2. Children are essentially asexual

This is false. The orgasmic reflex develops in the womb:

"We recently observed a female fetus at 32 weeks' gestation touching the vulva with the fingers of the right hand. The caressing movements were centered primarily on the region of the clitoris. Movements stopped after 30 to 40 seconds and started again after a few minutes. Furthermore, these slight touches were repeated and were associated with short, rapid movements of pelvis and legs. After another break, in addition to this behavior, the fetus contracted the muscles of the trunk and limbs, and then clonicotonic movements of the whole body followed. Finally, she relaxed and rested.

We observed this behavior for about 20 minutes. The mother was an active and interested witness, conversing with observers about her child's experience.

Evidence of male fetuses' excitement reflex in utero, such as erection or ?masturbation” movements, has been previously reported.

The current observation seems to show not only that the excitement reflex can be evoked in female fetuses at the third trimester of gestation but also that the orgasmic reflex can be elicited during intrauterine life. This would agree with the physiologic features of female sexuality: The female sexual response is separate from reproductive functions and doesn't need a full sexual maturity to be explicit."

Giorgi, Giorgio, and Siccardi, Marco (1996). "Ultrasonographic observation of a female fetus' sexual behavior in utero," American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 175, 3(1, part 1), 753.

"In a 1999 study of undergraduate students, 5.2% of females and 12.8% of males reported having engaged in sex play with their peers involving genital contact before elementary school, and that 1.3% of girls and 4.0% of boys had engaged in sex play involving anal/genital insertion (with objects or fingers) or oral-genital intercourse before elementary school. By the end of elementary school, the numbers increased to 29.2% for females and 32.9% for males for genital contact and 12.3 for girls and 10.1% for boys for insertion or oral sex. Very little pressure and almost no coercion were reported."

Reynolds, M.A., Herbenick, D. L., & Bancroft, J. (2003). The nature of childhood sexual experiences: Two studies 50 years apart. In J. Bancroft (Ed.), Sexual Development in Childhood (pp. 134-155). Indiana: Indiana University Press.

If children masturbate, orgasm, and have sex with each other, it is absurd to claim they are asexual.

3. Children cannot consent, and therefore having sex with children is rape, and we all know rape is harmful and immoral

Consent refers to the provision of agreement- if children are capable of initiating sexual activity, it is nonsensical to claim they cannot consent to it.

For example, in the animal kingdom, which has no taboo on childhood sexuality, sex between adult and children is common:

"Both adult males and females interact sexually with adolescents and juveniles (three-to-nine-year-olds). In fact, young females go through a five-to-six-year period sometimes referred to as ADOLESCENT STERILITY (although no pathology is involved) during which they actively participate in heterosexual mating (often with adults) but never get pregnant. Sexual behavior between adults and infants of both sexes is common - about a third of the time it is initiated by the infant and may involve genital rubbing and full copulatory postures (including penetration of an adult female by a male infant). (Biological Exuberance - 274)

Who is raping whom when the infant initiate sexual activity? Does the infant rape itself or does the adult rape the infant by not denying it sexual gratification?

3a. Children lack the ability to make informed consent

Sex is not some kind of complex and incomprehensible activity that requires a lot of knowledge to preform correctly- it is one of the simplest things in existence. Animals surely don't "understand" what sex is, yet it would be absurd to say all sex between animals is harmful or immoral.

5. This thread is disgusting and so are you.

This is not an argument.

Note that even though there is nothing inherently harmful about having sex with children, in our sex-negative culture, it very often is- see Joan A Nelson's quote above for an example. The harm did not come about from the sex itself, but from society's reaction to it- but regardless, it is still grossly immoral to risk ruining a child's life for the sake of an orgasm, even if the damage comes from iatrogenic sources.

So I'm not saying it's OK to have sex with children in this day and age- it most certainly is not. But the only reason it isn't is because of society's hysterical, unscientific, and maladaptive attitude towards this subject- if this were different, I see no reason why engaging in a harmless and mutually pleasurable activity with a child would be either harmful or immoral.

James Wilson #fundie conservatism.referata.com

The breast is an organ that was originally designed by God to allow for female humans and primates (humans are NOT primates, contrary to the fundamental beliefs of Darwinism) to feed milk to their young. This seemingly innocuous organ, much like others, was corrupted by sin. Sin is known for allowing things like lions killing animals to eat them, instead of the animal kingdom living in harmony.
"Mortify therefore your members which are upon the earth; fornication, uncleanness, inordinate affection, evil concupiscence, and covetousness, which is idolatry: For which things' sake the wrath of God cometh on the children of disobedience"- Colossians 3:5-6
"But we are all as an unclean thing, and all our righteousnesses are as filthy rags; and we all do fade as a leaf; and our iniquities, like the wind, have taken us away"- Isaiah 64:6
The fall of man is notable because it has caused sin to come into the world, and rampant sin has occupied every last inch of land on the globe. Breasts, which were and still are organs designed to feed infants, have been corrupted by Satan to cause sickening men and particularly apostate women to lust after them as some sort of sexual object. Satan knows this, and Satan therefore spawned the evil succubus Taylor Swift to corrupt young men into the wicked ways of the flesh, and Satan did so by giving Taylor Swift perfectly circular and perky breasts that she flaunts at every possible moment in these low-cut outfits that are wastes of fabric that would have been better used to clothe naked children in Africa than to accommodate the lustful desires of sick minded perverts who subvert the will and the name of God to fit their own agenda.
The breasts of human females, much like thorns in gardens and predatory lions, shows that sin has the power to corrupt the good things that God created.

wereqryan #sexist #crackpot incels.co

[Blackpill] Most of you are cucks who love women, and you use your superficial hate to hide your burning passion of love for women.

Those of you here who scream, whine and throw a hissy fit over not getting fucks, blowjobs, cuddles, affection from women are just as bad as the women-worshiping simps you hypocritically denounce. You still have a lot of realization to go through, and a lot of growing up to do because you've yet to realize women's inherent subhumanity and parasitic nature.

Subhumanity is a design feature for women; its a part of their programming. For men, subhumanity is a bug, because even the most downtrodden slave tier man can exert more effort than the average woman. Women seek Chad to compensate for their own weakness, which means that a man who successfully mates has to have the strength to cover for himself and his woman. When you realize these things, only then will the true blackpill awakening occur.

Sociopath_69 & nashyneddly #sexist reddit.com

Re: Based Tyrone

image

Oh no he didn't! Taneeesha hits back!

(Sociopath_69)
This is super Red Pill. She only wants men that worship her and grovel at her feet. Then when she's in a relationship, she wants men to continue to be a beta male slave and worship her, grovel at her feet, and be an obedient little beta male. If men become super Red Pill and start standing for themselves, she cheats on him and then dumps him. If the man continues to be a beta male simp, she cheats on him, then she dumps him and claims she FEELS bored in the relationship, and she "doesn't love you anymore".

You can never win with women. If you're too Alpha, then they dump you because of "muh feelings", if you're too beta, then they dump you because "Honey I just dont love you anymore".

They're so inherently Wicked, Evil, Chaotic and Retarded. They literally want men to be both Alpha and Beta. They want men to have the right amount of Alpha and Beta inside of them to quench their insatiable appetite for a "Good man".

Even then, nothing you do for a woman is ever enough, because as soon as you start to get too Beta or too Alpha, she'll cheat on you and dump you. Women don't actually Love men, they just love what men can do for them, women don't Love men, they just Love how men make them FEEL. Women are literally children.

Women are incapable of True Selfless Romantic Love for a man.

(nashyneddly)
She'll be unhappy forever. So many women try put on this stuff as a front but they don't believe it. They just have a dumb urge to go along with the crowd. When they're alone they cry. I saw a girl post about it just yesterday on here, how she puts on this "I hate kids, am strong and independent" front but she said word for word what I've been saying - but she doesn't want that, she wants kids, a cozy home, a guy she feels protected by and cries sometimes because she wants it so bad.

The only way women will get that is breaking away from the crowd and risking a few mean looks. But they can't do that.

Lordareon #fundie forum.nationstates.net


10 Reasons Why Homosexual “Marriage” is Harmful and not compatible with Christianity.

1. It Is Not Marriage

Calling something marriage does not make it marriage. Marriage has always been a covenant between a man and a woman which is by its nature ordered toward the procreation and education of children and the unity and wellbeing of the spouses.

The promoters of same-sex “marriage” propose something entirely different. They propose the union between two men or two women. This denies the self-evident biological, physiological, and psychological differences between men and women which find their complementarity in marriage. It also denies the specific primary purpose of marriage: the perpetuation of the human race and the raising of children.

Two entirely different things cannot be considered the same thing.

2. It Violates Natural Law

Marriage is not just any relationship between human beings. It is a relationship rooted in human nature and thus governed by natural law.

Natural law’s most elementary precept is that “good is to be done and pursued, and evil is to be avoided.” By his natural reason, man can perceive what is morally good or bad for him. Thus, he can know the end or purpose of each of his acts and how it is morally wrong to transform the means that help him accomplish an act into the act’s purpose.

Any situation which institutionalizes the circumvention of the purpose of the sexual act violates natural law and the objective norm of morality.

Being rooted in human nature, natural law is universal and immutable. It applies to the entire human race, equally. It commands and forbids consistently, everywhere and always. Saint Paul taught in the Epistle to the Romans that the natural law is inscribed on the heart of every man. (Rom. 2:14-15)

3. It Always Denies a Child Either a Father or a Mother

It is in the child’s best interests that he be raised under the influence of his natural father and mother. This rule is confirmed by the evident difficulties faced by the many children who are orphans or are raised by a single parent, a relative, or a foster parent.

The unfortunate situation of these children will be the norm for all children of a same-sex “marriage.” A child of a same-sex “marriage” will always be deprived of either his natural mother or father. He will necessarily be raised by one party who has no blood relationship with him. He will always be deprived of either a mother or a father role model.

Same-sex “marriage” ignores a child’s best interests.

4. It Validates and Promotes the Homosexual Lifestyle

In the name of the “family,” same-sex “marriage” serves to validate not only such unions but the whole homosexual lifestyle in all its bisexual and transgender variants.

Civil laws are structuring principles of man's life in society. As such, they play a very important and sometimes decisive role in influencing patterns of thought and behavior. They externally shape the life of society, but also profoundly modify everyone’s perception and evaluation of forms of behavior.

Legal recognition of same-sex “marriage” would necessarily obscure certain basic moral values, devalue traditional marriage, and weaken public morality.

5. It Turns a Moral Wrong into a Civil Right

Homosexual activists argue that same-sex “marriage” is a civil rights issue similar to the struggle for racial equality in the 1960s.

This is false.

First of all, sexual behavior and race are essentially different realities. A man and a woman wanting to marry may be different in their characteristics: one may be black, the other white; one rich, the other poor; or one tall, the other short. None of these differences are insurmountable obstacles to marriage. The two individuals are still man and woman, and thus the requirements of nature are respected.

Same-sex “marriage” opposes nature. Two individuals of the same sex, regardless of their race, wealth, stature, erudition or fame, will never be able to marry because of an insurmountable biological impossibility.

Secondly, inherited and unchangeable racial traits cannot be compared with non-genetic and changeable behavior. There is simply no analogy between the interracial marriage of a man and a woman and the “marriage” between two individuals of the same sex.

6. It Does Not Create a Family but a Naturally Sterile Union

Traditional marriage is usually so fecund that those who would frustrate its end must do violence to nature to prevent the birth of children by using contraception. It naturally tends to create families.

On the contrary, same-sex “marriage” is intrinsically sterile. If the “spouses” want a child, they must circumvent nature by costly and artificial means or employ surrogates. The natural tendency of such a union is not to create families.
Therefore, we cannot call a same-sex union marriage and give it the benefits of true marriage.

7. It Defeats the State’s Purpose of Benefiting Marriage

One of the main reasons why the State bestows numerous benefits on marriage is that by its very nature and design, marriage provides the normal conditions for a stable, affectionate, and moral atmosphere that is beneficial to the upbringing of children—all fruit of the mutual affection of the parents. This aids in perpetuating the nation and strengthening society, an evident interest of the State.

Homosexual “marriage” does not provide such conditions. Its primary purpose, objectively speaking, is the personal gratification of two individuals whose union is sterile by nature. It is not entitled, therefore, to the protection the State extends to true marriage.

8. It Imposes Its Acceptance on All Society

By legalizing same-sex “marriage,” the State becomes its official and active promoter. The State calls on public officials to officiate at the new civil ceremony, orders public schools to teach its acceptability to children, and punishes any state employee who expresses disapproval.

In the private sphere, objecting parents will see their children exposed more than ever to this new “morality,” businesses offering wedding services will be forced to provide them for same-sex unions, and rental property owners will have to agree to accept same-sex couples as tenants.

In every situation where marriage affects society, the State will expect Christians and all people of good will to betray their consciences by condoning, through silence or act, an attack on the natural order and Christian morality.

9. It Is the Cutting Edge of the Sexual Revolution

In the 1960s, society was pressured to accept all kinds of immoral sexual relationships between men and women. Today we are seeing a new sexual revolution where society is being asked to accept sodomy and same-sex “marriage.”

If homosexual “marriage” is universally accepted as the present step in sexual “freedom,” what logical arguments can be used to stop the next steps of incest, pedophilia, bestiality, and other forms of unnatural behavior? Indeed, radical elements of certain “avant garde” subcultures are already advocating such aberrations.

The railroading of same-sex “marriage” on the American people makes increasingly clear what homosexual activist Paul Varnell wrote in the Chicago Free Press:

"The gay movement, whether we acknowledge it or not, is not a civil rights movement, not even a sexual liberation movement, but a moral revolution aimed at changing people's view of homosexuality."

10. It Offends God

This is the most important reason. Whenever one violates the natural moral order established by God, one sins and offends God. Same-sex “marriage” does just this. Accordingly, anyone who professes to love God must be opposed to it.

Marriage is not the creature of any State. Rather, it was established by God in Paradise for our first parents, Adam and Eve. As we read in the Book of Genesis: “God created man in His image; in the Divine image he created him; male and female He created them. God blessed them, saying: ‘Be fertile and multiply; fill the earth and subdue it.’” (Gen. 1:28-29)

The same was taught by Our Savior Jesus Christ: “From the beginning of the creation, God made them male and female. For this cause a man shall leave his father and mother; and shall cleave to his wife.” (Mark 10:6-7).

Genesis also teaches how God punished Sodom and Gomorrah for the sin of homosexuality: “The Lord rained down sulphurous fire upon Sodom and Gomorrah. He overthrew those cities and the whole Plain, together with the inhabitants of the cities and the produce of the soil.” (Gen. 19:24-25)

TFP Student Action #homophobia #fundie tfpstudentaction.org

1. It Is Not Marriage
Calling something marriage does not make it marriage. Marriage has always been a covenant between a man and a woman which is by its nature ordered toward the procreation and education of children and the unity and wellbeing of the spouses.

The promoters of same-sex “marriage” propose something entirely different. They propose the union between two men or two women. This denies the self-evident biological, physiological, and psychological differences between men and women which find their complementarity in marriage. It also denies the specific primary purpose of marriage: the perpetuation of the human race and the raising of children.

Two entirely different things cannot be considered the same thing.


2. It Violates Natural Law
Marriage is not just any relationship between human beings. It is a relationship rooted in human nature and thus governed by natural law.

Natural law’s most elementary precept is that “good is to be done and pursued, and evil is to be avoided.” By his natural reason, man can perceive what is morally good or bad for him. Thus, he can know the end or purpose of each of his acts and how it is morally wrong to transform the means that help him accomplish an act into the act’s purpose.

Any situation which institutionalizes the circumvention of the purpose of the sexual act violates natural law and the objective norm of morality.

Being rooted in human nature, natural law is universal and immutable. It applies to the entire human race, equally. It commands and forbids consistently, everywhere and always. Saint Paul taught in the Epistle to the Romans that the natural law is inscribed on the heart of every man. (Rom. 2:14-15)

3. It Always Denies a Child Either a Father or a Mother
It is in the child’s best interests that he be raised under the influence of his natural father and mother. This rule is confirmed by the evident difficulties faced by the many children who are orphans or are raised by a single parent, a relative, or a foster parent.

The unfortunate situation of these children will be the norm for all children of a same-sex “marriage.” A child of a same-sex “marriage” will always be deprived of either his natural mother or father. He will necessarily be raised by one party who has no blood relationship with him. He will always be deprived of either a mother or a father role model.

Same-sex “marriage” ignores a child’s best interests.

4. It Validates and Promotes the Homosexual Lifestyle
In the name of the “family,” same-sex “marriage” serves to validate not only such unions but the whole homosexual lifestyle in all its bisexual and transgender variants.

Civil laws are structuring principles of man's life in society. As such, they play a very important and sometimes decisive role in influencing patterns of thought and behavior. They externally shape the life of society, but also profoundly modify everyone’s perception and evaluation of forms of behavior.

Legal recognition of same-sex “marriage” would necessarily obscure certain basic moral values, devalue traditional marriage, and weaken public morality.

5. It Turns a Moral Wrong into a Civil Right
Homosexual activists argue that same-sex “marriage” is a civil rights issue similar to the struggle for racial equality in the 1960s.

This is false.

First of all, sexual behavior and race are essentially different realities. A man and a woman wanting to marry may be different in their characteristics: one may be black, the other white; one rich, the other poor; or one tall, the other short. None of these differences are insurmountable obstacles to marriage. The two individuals are still man and woman, and thus the requirements of nature are respected.

Same-sex “marriage” opposes nature. Two individuals of the same sex, regardless of their race, wealth, stature, erudition or fame, will never be able to marry because of an insurmountable biological impossibility.

Secondly, inherited and unchangeable racial traits cannot be compared with non-genetic and changeable behavior. There is simply no analogy between the interracial marriage of a man and a woman and the “marriage” between two individuals of the same sex.

6. It Does Not Create a Family but a Naturally Sterile Union
Traditional marriage is usually so fecund that those who would frustrate its end must do violence to nature to prevent the birth of children by using contraception. It naturally tends to create families.

On the contrary, same-sex “marriage” is intrinsically sterile. If the “spouses” want a child, they must circumvent nature by costly and artificial means or employ surrogates. The natural tendency of such a union is not to create families.Therefore, we cannot call a same-sex union marriage and give it the benefits of true marriage.

7. It Defeats the State’s Purpose of Benefiting Marriage
One of the main reasons why the State bestows numerous benefits on marriage is that by its very nature and design, marriage provides the normal conditions for a stable, affectionate, and moral atmosphere that is beneficial to the upbringing of children—all fruit of the mutual affection of the parents. This aids in perpetuating the nation and strengthening society, an evident interest of the State.

Homosexual “marriage” does not provide such conditions. Its primary purpose, objectively speaking, is the personal gratification of two individuals whose union is sterile by nature. It is not entitled, therefore, to the protection the State extends to true marriage.

8. It Imposes Its Acceptance on All Society
By legalizing same-sex “marriage,” the State becomes its official and active promoter. The State calls on public officials to officiate at the new civil ceremony, orders public schools to teach its acceptability to children, and punishes any state employee who expresses disapproval.

In the private sphere, objecting parents will see their children exposed more than ever to this new “morality,” businesses offering wedding services will be forced to provide them for same-sex unions, and rental property owners will have to agree to accept same-sex couples as tenants.

In every situation where marriage affects society, the State will expect Christians and all people of good will to betray their consciences by condoning, through silence or act, an attack on the natural order and Christian morality.

9. It Is the Cutting Edge of the Sexual Revolution
In the 1960s, society was pressured to accept all kinds of immoral sexual relationships between men and women. Today we are seeing a new sexual revolution where society is being asked to accept sodomy and same-sex “marriage.”

If homosexual “marriage” is universally accepted as the present step in sexual “freedom,” what logical arguments can be used to stop the next steps of incest, pedophilia, bestiality, and other forms of unnatural behavior? Indeed, radical elements of certain “avant garde” subcultures are already advocating such aberrations.

The railroading of same-sex “marriage” on the American people makes increasingly clear what homosexual activist Paul Varnell wrote in the Chicago Free Press:

"The gay movement, whether we acknowledge it or not, is not a civil rights movement, not even a sexual liberation movement, but a moral revolution aimed at changing people's view of homosexuality."

10. It Offends God
This is the most important reason. Whenever one violates the natural moral order established by God, one sins and offends God. Same-sex “marriage” does just this. Accordingly, anyone who professes to love God must be opposed to it.

Marriage is not the creature of any State. Rather, it was established by God in Paradise for our first parents, Adam and Eve. As we read in the Book of Genesis: “God created man in His image; in the Divine image he created him; male and female He created them. God blessed them, saying: ‘Be fertile and multiply; fill the earth and subdue it.’” (Gen. 1:28-29)

The same was taught by Our Savior Jesus Christ: “From the beginning of the creation, God made them male and female. For this cause a man shall leave his father and mother; and shall cleave to his wife.” (Mark 10:6-7).

Genesis also teaches how God punished Sodom and Gomorrah for the sin of homosexuality: “The Lord rained down sulphurous fire upon Sodom and Gomorrah. He overthrew those cities and the whole Plain, together with the inhabitants of the cities and the produce of the soil.” (Gen. 19:24-25)

Taking a Principled not a Personal Stand
In writing this statement, we have no intention to defame or disparage anyone. We are not moved by personal hatred against any individual. In intellectually opposing individuals or organizations promoting the homosexual agenda, our only intent is the defense of traditional marriage, the family, and the precious remnants of Christian civilization.

As practicing Catholics, we are filled with compassion and pray for those who struggle against unrelenting and violent temptation to homosexual sin. We pray for those who fall into homosexual sin out of human weakness, that God may assist them with His grace.

We are conscious of the enormous difference between these individuals who struggle with their weakness and strive to overcome it and others who transform their sin into a reason for pride and try to impose their lifestyle on society as a whole, in flagrant opposition to traditional Christian morality and natural law. However, we pray for these too.

We pray also for the judges, legislators and government officials who in one way or another take steps that favor homosexuality and same-sex “marriage.” We do not judge their intentions, interior dispositions, or personal motivations.

We reject and condemn any violence. We simply exercise our liberty as children of God (Rom. 8:21) and our constitutional rights to free speech and the candid, unapologetic and unashamed public display of our Catholic faith. We oppose arguments with arguments. To the arguments in favor of homosexuality and same-sex “marriage” we respond with arguments based on right reason, natural law and Divine Revelation.

In a polemical statement like this, it is possible that one or another formulation may be perceived as excessive or ironic. Such is not our intention.

ForeEverAnIncel #sexist reddit.com

I’m proud to be an incel.

I’m tired of simps, chads, and of course, foids, calling me an incel. We’re the modern version of the jews in Nazi Germany. We’re kicked out of subreddits. Our subs get banned. Our thoughts and blackpills silenced. Why?

Is it because the truth hurts?

Admit it foids. You don’t care at all about personality. You would clearly fuck a good looking guy even if he was the shittiest person in the world. You wouldn’t care.

I always here the same bullshit advice. “Just go to the gym bro”, “just be yourself bro”, “find hobbies bro”. All of these are just shitty copes. None of them fucking work obviously.

Being a shortcel fucking sucks. Nobody takes our problems seriously.

We also know that the blackpill is absolutely true. Only good-looking people can be successful. Fuck they don’t even have to try. I instead have to live life on fucking hardcore mode. Women also live life in fucking easy mode. Seriously, if you’re a woman all you have to do is just fucking exist. Shit, you could be rich just by showing your tits online. Guys can’t fucking do that unless they are seriously attractive.

It’s game over for us. And you know what, I’m proud of it. We shouldn’t be afraid of our thoughts silenced. Reddit doesn’t like wrongthink. And the NPCs that reply will say the same old argument “omg who hurt you”, “found the incel”. You can’t even come up with a proper argument.

It’s over. When the incels rise up then the world will finally understand our struggle. Maybe we’ll have our own country too. Hail St. Elliot Rodger and St. BlackOps2Cel

Some incels #sexist reddit.com

Re: Looks are everything.

image

(DasRoteOrgan)

imagine some reddit simp doing the same on foid progress pics but with his dick

-500 downvoted 100+ comments calling him a creepy incel

foid ridiculing him for his size to try to be funny

Imagine calling yourself blackpilled and still struggling with the concept that sexual dimorphism goes deeper than physical appearance.

Yeah, it is different if a man does this because men and women are not the same.

It’s just funny to look at the double standard bro chill out

two standards for two different things

(PeechMan)

Only simps believe in any form of gender equality being possible

(ImHereForTheImages)

Yes but we are making fun of people who believe in "gender equality" by showimg the contradictions.

(kysuglydog)

itd be a different story if foid was sending pics of her nasty cunt, boobs for boobs, i doubt a woman would be super upset about getting pics of nice pecs

the original example is more equivalent for several reasons:

functionally; the penis is an external device, the vagina is internal, breasts are external

male breasts are not nearly as sexually associated

male breasts have much less dimension than females

Bill P #fundie unz.com

I sometimes wonder whether anti-fascism isn’t driven by some sexual pressure, i.e. the tikkun olam fags are really upset that they aren’t getting a piece of the action, so they agitate as though their balls are on fire.

Healthy women seem to have a thing for militant guys, and that must be extremely frustrating for the Dilberts out there, so they come up with all sorts of reasons why these guys should be condemned eternally for their damned sexiness.

I mean, shouldn’t academic weenies have a shot at these hot specimens from northern Europe instead of being stuck in sterile institutions with clumsy female nerds who have the sex appeal of lab monkeys?

This is why Morris Dees is such a hero to these types. Through shameless self-promotion and deceptive advertising the man achieved alpha male status despite taking on a cause associated with the dregs of manhood. Really, a man to look up to, and one whose achievements every weaselly liar should strive to emulate.

Oh, America, how proud I am of what you have wrought: the Clintonian scumbag with a girl under the table on her knees, selling out his own folk. A truly glorious specimen of homo nematodensis.

Claire Khaw #fundie thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.de

HOW TO IMPOSE A ONE-PARTY THEOCRACY IN BRITAIN

HOW TO ESTABLISH A BRITISH CALIPHATE IN ONE EASY STEP, WITHOUT CONVERTING A SINGLE SOUL

HOW TO DESTROY FEMINISM

HOW TO RETURN THE GOVERNMENT TO SANITY AND MORALITY

What is this first step?

The Koran is generally acknowledged to be a great work of literature, even by non-Muslims.

It is also said to be the directly revealed Word of God.

If that is so, it should be regarded as a contract between God and Man.

It promises to be a warning and a guide for mankind and warrants that its guidance will keep man peaceful and at peace with himself, but only if its directions are followed.

While it is said to be a religion of peace, it is also a religion of war – a war against evil and oppression, idolatry and irrationality, intoxication, usury, gambing and sexual licence.

This being so, it would benefit law students to study such a divine contract, whether or not they are Muslim as it would usefully add to their legal knowledge and drafting skills.

Even if Koranic knowledge were acquired reluctantly, just for the utilitarian purpose of passing a law exam and getting a law degree, it is very likely that the law student who goes on to becomes a legal practitioner will apply Koranic principles either consciously or unconsciously when interpreting and applying the law.

An example of this is seen in the case of Donoghue v Stevenson which promoted the Christian principle of love thy neighbour also found in The Old Testament in Leviticus. The Koran has a similar principle too.

004.036

YUSUFALI: Serve Allah, and join not any partners with Him; and do good- to parents, kinsfolk, orphans, those in need, neighbours who are near, neighbours who are strangers, the companion by your side, the wayfarer (ye meet), and what your right hands possess: For Allah loveth not the arrogant, the vainglorious;-


PICKTHAL: And serve Allah. Ascribe no thing as partner unto Him. (Show) kindness unto parents, and unto near kindred, and orphans, and the needy, and unto the neighbour who is of kin (unto you) and the neighbour who is not of kin, and the fellow-traveller and the wayfarer and (the slaves) whom your right hands possess. Lo! Allah loveth not such as are proud and boastful,


SHAKIR: And serve Allah and do not associate any thing with Him and be good to the parents and to the near of kin and the orphans and the needy and the neighbor of (your) kin and the alien neighbor, and the companion in a journey and the wayfarer and those whom your right hands possess; surely Allah does not love him who is proud, boastful;


There will doubtless be skeptics and Islamophobes who will have to be persuaded of the wisdom of adopting such a course, which they will find objectionable and frightening.

To counter them, simply form a Koran Book Club and offer generous prizes to non-Muslims only for essays that confirm what has been said above.

The Caliphate should be fully mature in about two decades, I predict.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/search?q=Secular+Koranism


1. If Islam is Judaism Lite, Secular Koranism is Islam Lite.
2. Secular Koranism is the vaccination for Radical Islam. Think of Edward Jenner and his immunisation programme. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Jenner Secular Koranism is cow pox and Radical Islam is small pox.
3. The problem with Muslims is that they prefer the Hadith to the Koran, even as they acknowledge the Koran to be the revealed Word of God, while the Hadith was compiled by fallible humans.
4. Muslims cannot bring themselves to reject the Hadith where it is contradicted by the Koran for to do so would be considered heresy by most of their fellow Muslims.
5. What Islamophobes hate about Islam comes from the Hadith.
6. If the Koran says "all animals are equal" the Hadith says "but some animals are more equal than others".
7. The Koran is well-drafted enough to withstand a literal interpretation.
8. Thesis = Old Testament; Antithesis = New Testament; Synthesis = Koran.
9. The Koran has less harsh punishments than the Old Testament.
10. The hatred the West have for Islam is based mainly on cultural chauvinism and the belief that brown and backward people whom they have conquered cannot possibly have a better religion than Christianity.
11. Napoleon Hill, who wrote THINK AND GROW RICH, promoted Islam. http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2009/03/think-and-grow-rich-author-napoleon.html
12. Man created God to protect him from the slut.
13. All the Abrahamic faiths promote the same moral precepts. The moral precepts promoted by the Abrahamic faiths bring about social cohesion, which protects your society from internal and external enemies.
14. Who are the internal enemies of a society? Sluts and socialists.
15. The patriarchy is maintained by the precepts of the Abrahamic faiths.
16. The matriarchy reasserts itself when the precepts of the Abrahamic faiths are abandoned.
17. All advanced societies are patriarchal, and all declining and primitive societies are matriarchal.
18. A patriarchy is a society that condones male promiscuity while a matriarchy is a society that condones female promiscuity.
19. Female promiscuity facilitates male promiscuity.
20. Male promiscuity is more easily checked by women being told not to be sluts.
21. A slut is a woman who has extramarital sex.
22. The evil the prohibition against extramarital sex was intended to prevent is widespread bastardy.
23. Widespread bastardy leads to widespread degeneracy and racial and national decline, leading eventually to civilisational extinction.
24. Only the Koran will save the West from feminism and allow it to go back to basics now.
25. To tolerate sluts means to tolerate bastards, to tolerate both means to tolerate a cancer growing within your society whose numbers grow exponentially. To say it is OK for women to be sluts means you are saying it is OK for your race and nation to breed an inferior, criminal, unproductive, degenerate and parasitical race within your race at the expense of the productive.
26. The defect of Christianity is that it requires a corrupt and corruptible priesthood who will interpret scripture to suit the political orthodoxy of the time, eg gay marriage.
27. The advantage of Islam is the Koran whose clearly-drafted precepts are easily translatable into legal principles.
28. The law restrains the extent of our immorality. "The people are the grass, the law the wind. When the wind blows, the grass will bend."
29. A legal system infused with Koranic principles can dispense with the need of for a corrupt and corruptible priesthood to maintain and promote morality.
30. Secular Koranism - a legal system and not a belief system - can be interpreted and applied by a non-Muslim judiciary.

eugene c. chavez #fundie greenspun.com

[On euthanasia for the terminally ill who suffer dire pain]

You lose. Suffering is temporary, God is eternal. You won't suffer eternally, Winston, if you love God. But suffering will be eternal for those who oppose God. No one can euthanize a soul in torment. It's just a question of a few years, and we'll all find out for ourselves. --Eternal life; or eternal pain.

Mick Williams #fundie disqus.com

"The Race to the Pit"

Welcome to a peek into the near future of a misguided communist utopia. Ecstatic with the success of their recent infanticide bill, increasingly murderous liberals are eager to accelerate the globalist dream of slashing the world's population by 94%. Witness the HPV vaccine manically pressed on teen girls, resulting in cases of sterilization. An African nation files futile suit against a software titan, whose vaccination program here, as in South America, has caused sterility and autism. The fanatical assault on, and feminization of men guarantees a plunging birth rate. Whereas conservatives see the Deep State as public enemy number one, the left pictures this dire threat as a just-delivered infant. Enter the surgeon with a diagonal cutting tool, and he isn't aiming for the umbilical.
Yet the enemies of freedom aren't content to freefall over the cliff; they're on the way to the pit on Buck Rogers rocket backpacks. Herewith a look at some pending bills in congress. First, the Liberal Offspring Fairness Act (widely derided by conservatives as 'LOFA, or LOAFER): Do conservative parents oppose your enlightened college worldview? Been living the good life long enough? Disinherit them and take what's yours. Changed your mind about having had kids? The Stop And Take Away Norman act allows for their euthanizing at any age.
Recent news items: Chinese paratroops occupy the failed third-world state of California. When delighted liberal leaders greet them with open arms, they're promptly sent in chains to re-education camps. When New York's new World Trade Center lights up in pink to celebrate the S.A.T.A.N. act, an earthquake levels Manhattan.
Judgment, of course, takes many forms. But it undoubtedly lurks just down a country lane in. . . .The Twilight Zone.

image

CH #sexist heartiste.wordpress.com

Drearily for lovers of Truth&Beauty, the modern Western sexual market may select against the production of exquisite female beauty.

Surplus women?

Nope. If anything, there’s a surplus of men in the West. Infant mortality rates have dropped, technology has brought immense comforts, wars of attrition are largely one-sided affairs now, and there’s been an effective elimination of male-skewed early deaths from hunting and disease.

Male paternal investment?

Retreating. Presumably it’s still an innate disposition in White Western men, but shocks to the functioning of the sexual market have incentivized a gradual shift to caddishness and delayed family formation, especially at the margins where there are men who could go either way (towards a dad or cad lifestyle).

Female dependence?

Nope. This is the big one. As I’ve argued here before, female economic self-sufficiency like we have now in the West creates massive negative feedback loops in the Male Commitment-Female Commitment Worthiness relationship. And as williamK notes, female independence (in which women can feed, house, and clothe themselves) not only pushes women to emphasize fulfillment of their desire for sexy cads, but it pushes men to DE-EMPHASIZE their beta provider skills. Men don’t feel inspired to wife up self-sufficient women; men DO feel inspired to provide for and protect vulnerable women. And in en environment of female dependence, men will be careful to choose the prettiest women they can get, because they will be investing a lot in her. In contrast, an environment of female independence encourages men to spread their seed indiscriminately, because the pressure to provide for careergirl yaass queen shrikes has diminished.

Executive summary: The West is currently selecting against the efflorescence of female Beauty and selecting FOR the effluvia of female Ugliness.

Literally feminism means more ugly women and fewer beautiful women. Feminism is the ideology of Ugliness.

Various Commenters #sexist incels.co

(Atavistic Autist)

[JFL] Femoid breaks up with high IQ Jewish physicist because he's an "insecure incel," bemoans the fact that she can't find an intelligent gigachad instead

I dated an incel, AMA

Meanwhile...

Why it is sooo unfair? If a guy is handsome most of the time he is stupid.

The foid literally admits that "personality" = "looks" here.

She juxtaposes a dumb Chad with an intelligent incel, yet specifies that the incel has "no personality."

Foid IQ: 0. She deserves nothing more than to be raped by monkeys (she's already having consensual sex with the "neighbor's dog," of course).

(WizardofSoda)

Thats evolution.. some bloodlines survived based on intellect, others on looks/physical strength.

There is few if any men out there who are handsome, healthy/strong and advanced minds.

(ItsOver4cel)

I’ve said it in previous threads and I shall say it again: foids’ minds are stuck in 10,000BC. They should be grateful to have met a very intelligent man but it just isn’t good enough for this bitch.

Yeah this. Actual intelligent men are pretty rare and these bitches treat them as the product of the week jfl when are they gonna admit they just want to suck Chad's dick and nothing more?

(GoffSystemQB)

People using the word "incel" in place of ugly male is brutal and confirms the blackpill. Jfl if you think Chad would EVER get called an incel regardless of his behavior in a relationship.

(Atavistic Autist)

Her other posts seem quite blackpilled:

We must be more understanding towards Inсels.

She is just being a benevolent feminist here.

She does not contest female control over the sexual selection process, considering it to be a given, and fundamentally agrees with the idea that highly intelligent incels have "defective" genes whereas the boneheaded Chads who make her wet have genes worthy of reproduction.

Her only point is that her fellow feminists should pity incels and say a prayer for us as we're sentenced to death. The only incels who can escape this fate are the psychopathmaxxers who are good enough at pretending to be NT and "alpha" to deceive a woman into believing it.

It would get deleted otherwise, I guess. There are some sentences, that were pretty based, but I need to sleep. She just described the status quo or not? Are you for forced male selection, just curious?

She describes the status quo and then fundamentally agrees with it. Nothing she says is anything more than virtue signalling, combined with her own style of redpilled nonsense.

She considers it an inevitability that females are the judges of what "good genetics" constitutes, their criteria being based on Fisharian Runaway qualities which have no actual bearing on men's fitness. Namely, "personality," which somehow a Chad who's dumber than a dog has more of than an intelligent incel (her reasoning being that intelligent incels tend to be neurotic and this doesn't make her cunt wet, like extroverted and imbecilic Chads do).

According to her, incels have to pretend to be those extroverted and imbecilic Chads in order to possibly impress a foid and then have sexual success with her. This is just a feminist version of the redpill. We need to deceive women with our perceived alphaness! Why not just put women into their place as inferior creatures who must submit to us?

She virtue signals about ultimately liking "ugly yet intelligent guys," but it's belied by her own stated nature, her own admission that Chads make her instantly wet and intelligent guys are merely a curiosity to her. She must be subjugated, or else she's just a hypocrite who's promoting the devolution of the species.

Top kek, do they have any self awareness at all, are they thick as shit or know what's up but don't give a fuck as to do so would be like folding on a pair of aces?

She wants a man who is high on the intelligence hierarchy, high on the looks hierarchy, and high on the NT hierarchy at the same time. This is her "Mr. Right." She is a picky bitch who is using the evolutionary psychology of the blackpill to justify her insane standards.

Intelligent men tend to be ugly, introverted, and neurotic if not autistic (in her terminology, "sociophobic"), and this makes her cunt shrivel.

On the other hand, sociopathic men who are attractive, extroverted, and outgoing tend to be dumber than dogs, which quickly bores her.

She wants the best of all worlds -- a giga-IQ, giga-NT, giga-Chad who mogs everyone, a man who she can bear settling down with. JFL.

Haha yeah she can totally get that if she gets herself a superhero reality, brilliant scientist takes strength serum or dumb brute has his brain Lasered with evolutionary beam.

Fucking dumb cunt, why would a guy that gets everything from his looks waste time reading books; no need & of course if you ain't turning heads you cope to get the good career & betabux a bitch but as we know this method ain't worth shit no more what with female empowerment of employment & simps. They call men the picky ones lol.

Hopefully she will find her standards satisfied in a Ted Bundy.

Intelligent, attractive, extroverted. The trifecta.

But a psychopath who will murder her. Good riddance, slut.

(PPEcel)

Wow, massive blackpill here.

"He is an incel because 1. ugly 2. virgin."

This confirms everything I already knew. You won't get an ounce of respect if you are male and not conventionally attractive. People look at you and based off of your appearance alone will judge your ethical predisposition.

Coming right from the fucking horse's mouth, ITards.

exactly

(FUCKITALLREEE)

JFL a blackpill straight from a femoid mouth, they still try to silence it.

image

Pretty guys are for fucking, smart guys are for dating.

To_Live_is to_Serve #sexist incels.co

[LifeFuel] Imagine if the gender roles were reversed.

You could get a one-way open relationship with your looksmatch while also using tinder to get Prime top percentage Stacies. Your fellow men will be lazy and thousand cunt stare making you a real catch. You will not have to work; you could just get a virgin betabuxx 7/10 engineer wife without sexual experience.

You could give thousands of cream pies and not worry about pregnancy as you have total control over paternity and abortion. You get easy well paid job as receptionist while your looksmatch get a depressing manual labour job. You could sell your dirty undies for money while staying completely anonymous and you could show your currently subhuman body on webcam to get endless compliments and money by women who want to admire your body. You would get softer sentences and it would be a crime to make you homeless. You would not get attacked violently by other men as they have a great solidarity and would burn 1000 women alive instead of having your needs go unmet which the government would support.

All modern media would cater to your hedonistic desires while you would be praised for having the spirituality you have. Genes would be filtered out by selection of females instead of female selection meaning that your mass reproduction could be justified as a part of evolution. You could have sex with virgin teens illegally and they would be grateful for you taking their virginities and creampieing them. You could help the incel normies ascend in this world and get praised as a moral paragon by both the privileged and the unprivileged. You would get endless personalised compliments by sending a mass message on your real tinder intead of just the catfish account.

Women would instinctively protect you with their lives and send you gifts, expecting nothing in reward and getting joyfully over a dicpic which they would brag about getting from you on the internet. No face would be too foul and no penis too small for you to live a life of leisure and privilege and anyone who says otherwise would get deplatformed immediately. Women would still cook food and take care of children as betabuxxers do now. You would decide when sex is had in the relationship and media would uphold male pastimes like warfare, sport and gaming while condemning fraudulent make-up. Women who get caught frauding men get burned alive by jealous women as soon as you give the hint.

You wouldn't need to have a personality or an inner monologue to get by but having one would grant you great opportunities. You could wear shorts in public and get compliments IRL daily while being able to have sex with any woman who compliments you. You would be the archetype of an admirable moral person. Parties with high energy would be held to attract and amuse people like you and get you to open up and have sex like for young females. All men would have a similar smv; some difference in attraction would exist but fetishes even it all out. All female students and teachers would want you and especially you as you don't appear to be damaged by the cunt coaster. It would be paradise-like.

The true paradise comes from within but is a poor comfort when you are poor, wet and unwanted.

CH #sexist heartiste.wordpress.com

Captain Obvious draws the obvious parallel between masculinizing women and a culture’s operative sexual market.

R-Selection necessarily MASCULINIZES women, because under R-Selection, women have to FIGHT their way into an Alpha’s harem.

You could pretty much state it as a foundational premise of Evopsych that you have “Femininity if and only if K-Selection” [i.e. monogamy].

r-selection is the term to describe a sexual market dominated by polygyny, high fertility, lower paternal certainty (and thus lower paternal investment), and usually the sexual or marital disenfranchisement of beta males. Africa is a prime example.

K-selection is the opposite: a term to describe a sexual market dominated by monogamy, lower fertility, higher paternal certainty (and thus higher paternal investment), and usually the sexual or marital enfranchisement of beta males. Northern Europe is a prime example.

C.O. is right that masculinized women — in appearance and personality — are a feature of r-selected societies, because women fight for a few alpha men, toil for their bread, and generally put less effort into behaving or looking womanly because their men are pump and dumpers who won’t stick around for the duration and are just looking for an ass to hump.

In contrast, the men of K-selected societies are romantically inclined to long term monogamy, and seek women with very feminine attributes. If a man is in it for the long haul, he’ll want a woman who herself brings a lot to the bargaining table, and her number one asset is her loveliness and femininity.

[You just stated that it's the other system where women have to work, and you're very eager to talk about how poorly women age ("The Wall"), what the fuck are they bringing to the bargaining table in your K-selection?]

If a nation’s women are masculinizing, that is a portent of civilizational collapse, because r-selected societies are backward, violent societies filled with bitter beta males and bastard children. The masculinizing women are biologically responding and adapting to a change in sexual market norms and functioning, that requires of women a willingness to compete more forcefully with other women for the honor to be part of an alpha’s de jure or de facto, concomitant or serial, concubinage. As a culture’s women become more or less masculine, that culture is likewise becoming more or less r-selected.

Slut walks?

Pussyhats?

Studies in Patriarchal White Male Privilege?

Bitter spinsters typing Feedbuzz agitprop encouraging younger women to follow their EatPrayCarousel lifestyle?

Preteen glam mags offering tips to younger and younger women how to sexually satisfy themselves and their boyfriends using a variety of sex toy implements?

[There's a lot you could say about that last one, but Cosmo being masculinizing is a new one.]

These and more are the cultural hallmarks of masculinizing women. The West is becoming Africa (minus the cannibalism, but give it time).

Jean-Batave Poqueliche #sexist returnofkings.com

It is grim to realise that we have reached a point where our contemporary society is so sick, that it could be healthier for everyone if women were imposed the legal status of property instead of being free individuals. The fact that this absurd method could indeed create a safer society shows how cancerous our “progressive” Western world has become.

...

Women would keep the status of human beings even by becoming property. They would become the asset of a Senior Male Authority (SMA) from birth until his death or their own. In practice, the bond between man and female property would resemble the one between a legal guardian and a minor, incapacitated senior or mentally handicapped adult.

With women being children in adult bodies, the comparison is appropriate. But where the authority of the legal guardian expires in time, the right over female property would not be finite. All decisions would be taken by the SMA (father, older brother, then husband). The auction of a young woman from a father to a suitor of his choice would be agreed upon by setting a dowry.

Purchasing power would be in the hands of the SMA, preventing women to spend male income on frivolous and useless items like female “holidays” (the real sex tourism), designer clothes, drugs, club entrances and the like.

...

This measure would include the right of repudiation for the husband in case of serious misconduct. The decision would have to be studied and approved by a jury of adult all-male peers.

Repudiation would be efficient to keep women in line because they greatly fear being called out, held accountable, and losing resources or status because of self-inflicted behaviour, and this proposal would not deprive them from love. On the contrary, because of the affection that a man shows towards his property (added to the blood or family bound), the women he acquires will be safer. His “investment” has both a financial implication in addition to an emotional one.

To the triggered liberals, women are already property in Islam. But all I hear about it from the left on social media are crickets. Contrary to Shariah law, my theory does not include whipping, gang rape, honour killing, beheading or stoning when women are at fault.

...

10 societal benefits of declaring women legal property

1. No women in the military or police, so men and women would die less.

2. Divorce would plummet and single mommery would become a rarity.

3. No access to funds (under SMA supervision) for women would benefit the global economy.

4. Being a negotiable asset, women would be under constant male protection.

5. Women (and men) would die less of drug, tobacco, alcohol abuse and the heart diseases, cancers and violent or accidental deaths caused by it.

6. Due to heavy competition, women would have to be thinner, reducing the epidemic of obesity and the health risks that it involves.

7. Less child mortality and death during childbirth (women giving birth younger combined with better healthcare hence greater chances of survival).

8. No more left-leaning parties elected as women would be deprived of the right to vote.

9. Conservative governments elected by men would favour traditional families over leeches and degenerates.

10. Less domestic violence as women would avoid damaged men, having no personal resources (and hitting your woman would be like keying your own car: pointless).

...

7 ways this proposal would bring balance to the sexual market

1. No more welfare policies encouraging women to remain single or raise bastards. Welfare would be focused on those who need it the most, like veterans or the elderly.

2. No more inflated ego and instant gratification through attention whoring on social media. Its restricted access would create saner women. Promotion of degeneracy would be greatly reduced in the mainstream and social media.

3. No Instagram prostitution for wealthy sheikhs, being defiled for platform shoes and handbags with “stylish” patterns worthy of a child doodle.

4. Women would actively seek males based on their ability to provide, as they would have no alternative access to wealth.

5. Males would access a healthier sexual market, their hard work being rewarded by regular sexual intercourse, relative loyalty and children.

6. No more violent third world hordes imported by the votes of bitter women. No more homosexual agenda, gateway to the next great taboo, the pedophile-friendly agenda.

7. Professional advancement and success earned by women through sexual favours, like the one popular in Hollywood, would virtually disappear as adultery would be a valid reason for repudiation. “Promotion through horizontal refreshment” would only be used by already repudiated women, nothing of value would be lost.

...

It is not a panacea. The nature of women can’t be changed, but women-as-property would be finally held accountable after the “empowered” ones spent such a long time driving the Western world into the ground.

AccountError #racist #psycho incels.co

[Serious] People give ER shit for false reasons

From reading My Twisted World, it is very apparent that alot of the shit that's used against him is false. He was never the rich person people claim he was, his father was facing a financial crisis and Elliot only had a few thousand in the bank, which is practically nothing. He might've had a BMW, but that's it, there really was nothing else going for him in terms of wealth.

Elliot did not exclusively want a blonde stacy gf, he had multiple points of interests in other type of foids. The quotes about him wanting a blonde stacy are just projections of the perfect women, he legit didn't have 2/10 foids asking him out, if they did he wouldn't have gone ER.

And speaking of asking out, Elliot mostly gets shit for not asking a foid out. It sounds legitimate at first, but let's be real, Elliot knew the signs women gave him. Most blackpilled users will understand women will give non- verbal cues to signal that don't want to talk to you or even have any interaction. It would not be a stretch to say that ER picked up on these as even a bluepill simp can.

Lastly, Elliot isn't handsome. He was short for his area, hapa, small frame and big lips. It is delusional to think that women would find him attractive, let alone in an area full of Cali chads. JFL

BlkPillPres #fundie incels.co

[Blackpill] To Those That Are Religious - Your God Even Made Getting To Heaven Easier For Chad & Stacey

@BlkPillPres

Its easier for someone who is physically attractive to live a "Godly life" and make it into heaven, they can spend their younger years thoroughly enjoying degeneracy, "find God" like most Christians conveniently after getting to "have their fill" of degeneracy, "settle down" and still get to enjoy some degeneracy "within the sanctity of marriage" and they still get to go to heaven even though they lived lives 100 times more degenerate than us.


That's another black pill for you, Chad even has it easier with respects to getting into heaven because everyone is going to sin, but Chad gets to enjoy sinning to an extent that he doesn't feel like he's "missing out" in his later years, while guys like us are escortceling in our 30's and up to make up for lost time and experiences never had, he's starting a family with that Stacey he met at a college gangbang and started dating, and becoming a "man of God" JFL this world is ridiculous when you really think about it.

Your God has practically almost set in stone that he's sent you to hell, even before you were born and were being formed in the womb, because by being unattractive God has set you up for a life where you will be "chasing sin and degeneracy" into your old age, while Chad and Stacey have already "sowed their wild oats" and thoroughly enjoyed degeneracy and are now moving on to living a "Godly Life".

dyellow #sexist #homophobia #psycho incels.co

[Blackpill] Most men DESERVE to be incels

Mostly normies. Think about it rationally: women don't have moral agency, they're just instincts, but men can think. Who do you blame, the dog or the owner?
I blame the owner. Cucks have allowed the peak of degeneracy we are living, they are the enemies, not foids. These men are worthless sacks of shit that will sell their souls just to get attention from a woman, such people don't deserve to even be normies, they deserve to be incels, and live a live of servitude. I don't deserve to be an incel, I'm a hard worker, I have good values, strong and capable. I just happened to be born with an ugly face, this is totally unfair.
Now lets see who deserves to be thrown in concentration camps:
-White Knights
-Men into Findom
-Subscribers of twitch thots
-Men that like/compliment foids on social media
-"Sugar Daddies"
-Cucks
-"Sissy" fags
-coprophiliacs
-Masochists

More suggestions?

pharma insider #conspiracy naturalnews.com

On June 4th, 2015, REUTERS accurately reported that arch evil and overtly criminal MERCK (mass murders on Vioxx, mass sterilizers with Gardasil, fakers/fraudsters on Tamiflu), criminally colluded with the US FDA, to criminally block approval of all competitors' MMR Vaccines and then arch evil criminal MERCK criminally colluded with the US CDC to criminally hide since early 2003 that the Merck MMR Vaccine has empircally spiked us infant and chils AUTISM by at least 314 percent.

dsar9012 #sexist sluthate.com

MGTOWs are destroying the roasties and cuck on /pol/
I noticed on /pol/ recently (at 4chan not 8chan), there are more and more guys who are going MGTOW and are even blacpilled incels who are going their own way (like me). Great news, since /pol/ is very influence, far more so than pretty much any subreddit and far more than Sluthate or any other incel site.

With luck the number of blackpilled men who are incel or MGTOW and know the truth about women will accelerate, as social media has allowed women to show their true nature and completely destroyed blupilled ideology that women want nice, caring guys. And completely destroyed cuckservative ideology that guys should just get married and start a family with some thot who can accuse you of rape with no proof and get you sent to prison for years, or fuck outside the marriage, get knocked up and then ask the husband to pay child support for a kid that isn't even his for 18 years.

Soon these feminist and cuckservative pussy worshipping SIMPS will run out of bluepilled cucks to exploit. Soon being MGTOW or incel will be a point of PRIDE (it already is for me) rather than targets of derision and degradation as they are for so much of modern, liberal, feminist, western, multicultural society. LONG LIVE MGTOW!! And also blackpilled incels who are spreading the truth about bitches, you just need to swallow the final blackpill that getting married/dating women is not worth it in the long run, especially if you're an omega male who women don't like.

3 Anonymous Cowards #sexist godlikeproductions.com

[Note: Three separate posts, bolding in originals]

List of female PR phrases

I don't wear make up for men I wear it for myself
Translation: I wear makeup to increase my sexual market value and get attention from men but I don't want to admit I'm superficial.

It's not easy to just leave an abusive relationship
Translation: I didn't want to leave him because he was such a chad but now I also want sympathy and attention from you simps.

personality and confidence are most important
Translation: A strong jaw and hunter eyes are most important.

You're not that ugly. Some girl out there will be lucky to have you
Translation: Don't even thinking about dating me or my friends you ugly subhuman, get the fuck away from me.

I like a man with passions and goals
Translation: I like a man who has a lot of money or going to make a lot of money and wagecucks for me.

I'm not even attracted to chad
Translation: I would lick chad's asshole but I'm sub 5 so he probably won't let me anyway.

I have depression
Translation: chad hasn't texted me back

---

Oh he's just a friend
Translation: He is the back up I keep here in case I want to cheat on you or leave you

The first thing we notice about you is your shoes.
Translation: The first thing we notice about you is your height and face.

I'm not looking for a relationship right now.
Translation: I just want to friendzone you and have you around for emotional support while I look for Chad dick to suck.

---

You're a creep
Translation: You're ugly and I think you're interested in me. Fat chance.

You're so disrespectful
Translation: You're disrespectful of my prescense because you're ugly

I want to rescue him
Translation: He's a POS but idk because he's chad

I want someone to sweep me off my feet
Translation: Not only do I demand chad but I also demand he be a stellar human being

You don't understand what its like being a woman
Translation: My life is hard because only Brad agreed to fuck me today, not Chad

You're such a nice guy.
Translation: You're ugly. Fuck off.

You're so quiet.
Translation: You're ugly. Fuck off.

You'd be perfect for another girl.
Translation: You're ugly. Bother someone else.

You treat me so much better than Chad.
Translation: Please continue lavishing me in validation while I fuck n' suck an actual human being.

Improve yourself.
Translation: Slave your life away so you can't even think about anything else than being a reliable betabux provider.

NO FUCKBOYS
Translation: Looking for fuckboys (i.e, Chad)

Various incels #sexist reddit.com

RE: Woman is forced to live for 2 weeks like an incel lives his whole life - without validation and intimacy. Guess what happened?

(Crazila)

This is beyond pathetic actually, imagine failing tutorial mode

(RedditSoyBoyBetaCuck)

Couldn't care less as women like this would want someone like me dead even if they don't admit it.

(basedautist)

Stacy commits suicide over having to social distance and live like an incel in a matter of weeks.... But we aren't entitled to social interaction or relationships where people care about us?

HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM

(shii410)

JFL. I literally haven't had to change my daily routine at all as a result of quarantine. She probably had more social outings planned over those two weeks than I've ever attended in my entire life. After spending her entire life being constantly validated, given attention, going out with friends, going to parties, clubs, having sex with guys, etc.; just a COUPLE WEEKS of having none of that was too much for her. And she still tried to claim that she was a social outcast? This is hilarious. It's like if you took all of Jeff Bezos' money and forced him to live like an Amazon factory worker.

(Terminator_Commando)

Also many brocels have hardened psyche and don't really care anymore about the fucked-up nature of the black pill, it's just a part of life at this point. Hardened psyche is important. Can you imagine the fragile normies taking such doses of the blackpill? Half of them would rope immediately and the other half would get hooked on drugs. I'd say it's an advantage, if some of you would break the habit of rotting and go out there and make money and fuck over some normies and stacies, some of you will succeed. You will never be attractive but you can make money in this fucked up world

(Sepukkumaxx)

These are the same brain dead whores that regurgitate platitudes like "You just gotta learn to be with yourself. If you don't even want to spend time with you why would you expect anyone else to?"

(AdminsSuckMyDick)

Imagine being so used to 24/7 in person attention and validation that a few days with being restricted to only online validation sends you off the rails.

She went from getting 1,000x the validation of most men to only getting 500x the validation and took the rope.

Now imagine if she had to live 2 hours as an incel?? She would have psychotic PTSD for the rest of her life.

Not Guna lie though. I do feel bad for her. She received a dangerous amount of validation. So much so, that her ego depended on it. Shows how these simps are really fucking up the mental state of women.

(Mikhail_Popkov_100)

This is Fucking LifeFuel. Hahahaha LMAO!!

Pomidor Quixote #sexist dailystormer.name

Watch: Slut Airport Meltdown, Telepathic Rapist Saves the Day

Although this isn’t as epic as the psychotic meltdown from the vape shop employee, it has some charm.

Daily Mail:

This is the shocking moment a woman erupts into a furious tirade at a member of staff at an airport in front of horrified passengers.

The passenger, who was scheduled to fly on JetBlue on Sunday, launches a furious verbal attack at the staff member standing behind the desk as he tries to call for help.

Footage, captured at Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport, Florida, shows the female passenger screaming at the staff member after she was denied entry to the plane due to signs of intoxication.

Saying that normal female behavior is a sign of intoxication is very misogynistic. What the woman in the video does is a symptom of not becoming a mother immediately after their first period.

She threw a tantrum because she’s still a child. Women are in a perpetual state of infancy and the only option they have to evolve their brains a little bit is becoming mothers. The sooner after they first period, the better.

Pregnancy begins changing their brains and best case scenario, it takes their psyche from child-level to teenage-level. Sterilizing themselves through birth control so they can become community flesh toys stunts their growth and denies them their existential purpose. They’re born with the baby-making organs to use them.

Women are baby factories. There’s no way around that. They exist to make babies and operate kitchens. If they were supposed to do other stuff, they wouldn’t have been born with the baby-making organs, and they wouldn’t have been born so weak. Physically and mentally weak.

The further away they get from their purpose, the more corrupted they become.

In the recording, the unnamed woman launches her body above the desk and bellows: ‘God damn it! Who does that to a woman like me. Who?’

As she hoists her body off the ground and onto the JetBlue counter designated as a help desk for Cuba flights she carries on her verbal outburst by calling staff ‘rapists’ and threatening that she has a gun.

She continues: ‘Get me out of here! Get me out of this sick f***ing place! Get me out of here! Get me out of here! I have a f***ing gun on me because I’m homeless!‘

She should insert herself into the music industry. Her first hit could be called A Woman Like Me.

Check out its lyrics:

Get me out of here!
Get me out of here!
Get me out of this sick fucking place
Get me out of here!
Get me out of here!
I have a fucking gun on me because I’m homeless
Get me out!

It has some ring to it doesn’t it? She doesn’t even need to make the lyrics longer or say anything else really. Modern mainstream music is carefully designed by occultists to harvest your energy through low-vibration negative mantras anyways. Most people even physically feel their energy being taken away, the so-called chills, and assume that’s just a feeling people get when the music is good or when they like it very much. Normies are so uninterested in reality…

But yeah, some interesting symbolism in her sayings there.

Fertile women that are not mothers are emotionally homeless because they see no place for their hearts in the world. Deep down they know the reason why they were born the way they were born is so they could bring more babies to the world.

Imagine knowing without a doubt what your life purpose is — what you were made for — and thinking that you can’t or aren’t supposed to fulfill it.

Can you imagine that feeling? That’s what women feel thanks to the relentless Jewish social engineering that has brainwashed them into believing that what they are is not okay and that they should be more like men.

They experience a constant existential crisis.

The infuriated traveler then picks up a large, green duffel bag and walks away.

Walks away for a bit.

If the airport staff hadn’t telepathically raped her, the meltdown could have been much worse. Who knows, maybe she’d have taken out the gun she carries around because she’s homeless and the headlines would have been different.

Rape saved the day.

K-Rino #conspiracy genius.com

Grand Deception
K-Rino
Produced By Paragon
Album Solitary Confinement
GRAND DECEPTION LYRICS

[Intro: K-Rino]
As we move forward
Any time you come closer to something
Your vision should get clearer
Am I right?

[K-Rino]
You are a tool and the Hidden Hand is using you
Please don't be delusional, the rulers of this world practice confusing you
The people and the priest and the imams have been jammed
By government scams, mind systematically programmed
Blatant black hatred and racism
The way they laced the whole world and nation with traces of Satanism
This place is a pagan prison, the Founding Fathers' enslaving
Intentions were no different then Bush's and Reagan's visions
1776 they took action
This Illuminati took form and was spawned from a Colombian faction
Just flip your one dollar bill over
And if you want me to expose the true code of deception, I will show ya

We live in a designed wicked system
The number 13 is consistent in Masonic symbolism
It represents transformation, 12 completes the cycle
So 13 is rebirth and regeneration
The meanings of this symbol are strategically hid
On the left side you see a 13 layer pyramid
Over that, sits the The All-Seeing Eye where the light shines
A sign of the Devil watching over you at all times
With the words "Annuit coeptis"
13 letters meaning, "He has favored our undertakings", will you accept this?
Or will you learn the science and ignore 'em
Under the pyramid you see "Novus ordo seclorum"
Translated: "New Order of the World" or "the New World Order"
Authors and Satanic fathers of mass slaughter
The Eagle that you see on the right
Sits below 13 stars with a shield that has 13 stripes
And an olive branch in its claws with 13 leaves
Which is suppose to be in its talon to represent peace
But peace was always on a decrease
His other claw holds 13 arrows of war set to be released
And the letters at the bottom of the pyramid are fixed
With the Roman Numerals that equal 1776
The United States of America exists
In a deep devilish abyss with truth and paganism mixed

Every President that ever lived was foul
They gather at Bohemian Grove where they bow down before the Owl
See the Owl is wise and sees through the darkest of night
And there's a small one on the dollar near the one on the top right
It ain't hard to understand this government was never for us
The eagle was based off the Egyptian hawk Horus
The 13 colonies grew into wicked sovereignty
And made no apology for the obvious idolatry
Subconsciously we follow the ways of the Beast
And pay homage to pagan gods when we say the days of the week
Like Sunday, they worship the Sun; Monday, is Moon's Day
Týr the god of war was worshipped on Tuesday
Odin the Chief God is who Wednesday is named for
Thursday is Thor's Day, god of thunder, the mighty Thor
Friday was named after Frigga notice the pattern
Saturday is the Roman god of agriculture Saturn
Frigga was the goddess of love, the wife of Odin
The polytheistic theology needed decoding

The rituals like trips across the sand this man takes
The skull and bones fraternity, the secret handshakes
But understand he receives only 33 degrees
He secretly believes in Lucifer and other deities
Many powerful and rich people are controlled by these
They even hold the soul of several of your favorite emcees
Politicians telling lies, tongues whittled with thorns
And use hand gestures shaped in the form of Devil horns
You don't feel the city home cos you don't know what it entails
Satan tampers with stem cells and sprays chemtrails

The so called holidays are hypocrisy
Established to use religious doctrines to commit annual robbery
Christmas split in half is Christ Mass
The so-called birth of Jesus where every home has glowing lights cast
Christ the anointed One, Mass the birth celebration
But Jesus' birth was kept secret due to the situation
The King initiated a death plot
Cause a Messiah was prophesied to rule so Jesus' murder was authorized
No one knows the actual date, that's why sometimes you see 'Xmas'
X means unknown but ignorance affects us
A fraud that was purposely flawed
December 25th's is the birthday of the wicked ruler Nimrod
This whole disguise is part of Satan's universal wise
A Holy Prophet's life being pimped and commercialized

Traditions like lights on trees
Rooted in the Nicaea Council in 325 AD by Constantine
These matters would decreed
The concept of a virgin birth was actually conceived and then agreed
With graven images in the temple
The fish on your car is called Oannes, a Babylonian symbol
It's visibly contradictory, telling your children lies
You need to make them study Santa Clause's sick history
But yet we go wherever Satan leads us
The falsehoods we practice in his name ain't got nothing to do with Jesus

CertifiedRabbi #fundie reddit.com

Contrary to the common talking point that eugenics is "thoroughly debunked pseudoscience", eugenics is actually one of the most important ideas in all of human history. There's nothing pseudoscientific about the idea of improving the human gene pool. Virtually all scientists, academics, intellectuals, and progressives in the late 19th and early 20th century supported eugenics for a reason: it's the logical conclusion of Darwinian evolution.

We all recognize the importance of keeping the gene pools strong and healthy in other species, but we make an exception for our own species because we think that we're somehow immune from the accumulative effects of dysgenics. Reality check: we're not.
After the Nazis tried to implement their utopian Aryan society through utilizing extremely brutal forms of eugenics, the Western world decided to not only turn their backs on eugenics, but we went in the exact opposite direction by actually celebrating dysgenics.
The left encourages mass 3rd world immigration and miscegenation and embraces various forms of Marxism and egalitarianism, and the right demonizes birth control and abortion and embraces Christian universalism. Adopting 3rd world kids and dating outside of your race has almost become a fashion statement on both the left and the right. And the right has become even more dysgenic by viewing handicapped babies as a blessing from God. At least the left still has enough common sense to abort their handicapped fetuses. That's why down syndrome is almost completely non-existent in Iceland now.

Now, I'm not saying that we should become like the ancient Greeks and practice infanticide by tossing our handicapped babies off of a cliff, or like the early 20th century American progressives by forcibly sterilizing the feeble minded, or like the Nazis by gassing the mentally ill and other undesirables. But we need to start rethinking our opposition to eugenics now that we have enough scientific understanding and technical know-how to implement the utopian promises of eugenics without violating anyone's basic human rights.

We can all agree that countries like Switzerland and Japan greatly benefit from having an average IQ score that's about 30 points higher than the average IQ score in Nigeria and Kenya, right? Well, imagine if we could create a society that had an average IQ score of 130, 150, 180, or even 200. And imagine if we could locate the genes and alleles that make people extremely conscientious. And imagine if we could locate the genes and alleles that allow people to live long, healthy lives and break world records in sports. And imagine if we could humanely remove the genes and alleles that make people prone to criminality. We'd be able to create the most advanced civilization that ever existed within just 3 or 4 generations. And every generation would be a significant improvement over the last generation.

And we could accomplish this utopian vision without forcibly sterilizing or killing anyone. All we'd have to do is subsidize contraception and early-term abortion and make genome sequencing, embryo selection, and precision gene editing mandatory by law. Crime would disappear; productivity, GDP, and technological advancement would sky rocket; political corruption and bad governance in general would be a thing of the past; health care costs would plummet; everyone would look like supermodels; et cetera.
And leftists should support this utopian sci-fi vision as well because we'd finally be able to solve inequality and transcend the primitive tribalism that has defined our species for millennium. We'd also finally be able to fix the underlying genetic shortcomings which have held back the lower classes and brown people over the last several decades. And we'd actually be greatly diminishing human suffering by curing genetic diseases.

Eugenics is also the most logical and effective solution to climate change and a long list of other serious environmental problems. I'm a former far-left environmental extremist, so I'm very aware of the fact that human overpopulation is almost always the root cause of most environmental challenges. I'm also very aware of the fact that exponential human population growth is a looming crisis that barely anyone has the balls to talk about because they don't want to be viewed as creepy misanthropes and Bond villains. But the fact remains that our planet's dwindling natural resources simply can't sustain a population of 10+ billion people, especially if standards of living and consumption levels in the 3rd world continue to rise. So, if we have to dramatically reduce the human population, then selecting for the best and brightest simply makes sense.

Incel_Because_Short #crackpot #sexist incels.co

[Discussion] An explanation for how short/ugly/ethnic guys sometimes get a girlfriend.

The blackpill is true, but often you get special cases where a guy is somehow dating way above his looksmatch. You probe further and you find that this guy isn't rich or has much status. I'm going to explain how this happens.

Typically before the relationship, the guy was simping for her while she was either dating a guy (Chad) or hooking up. Now for one reason or another, her relationship/FWB arrangement with Chad goes sideways; She really liked Chad and he burned her by not wanting to get into a relationship. So she ends up feel angry at Chad, very insecure and wanting the easiest way to feel better and somewhat get some revenge.

So what does she do? It's simple, she finds her simp, who is the complete opposite of Chad, and dates him. This does a couple of things:

1. It eases her insecurity, because her boyfriend is doing what she wanted Chad to do (worship her and love her unconditionally). Also, her friends will compliment her and state that she's too good for her simp boyfriend.

2. It's her way of "Getting back at Chad". In her point of view, dating the ugly simp is revenge because she valued the relationship with Chad, so she thinks Chad will also regret not dating her.

Ultimately, these types of relationships don't last too long because they are based on a false premise. The whole purpose for the relationship was so that the foid builds up her confidence. Once she feels confident enough to go after Chads again, she typically dumps him and that's the end of that.

Cornfed #sexist happierabroad.com

The reproductive superiority of stupid assholes

I realize this point has been made before and I may be boring people, but think of it this way: How many grandchildren is a Western woman likely to have if she has a few children fathered by stupid assholes vs. if she has a few children fathered by intelligent, righteous men? The answer - obviously vastly more.

Because they don't care about the consequences to other people and are too stupid to worry much about the potential downside for themselves, stupid assholes can go around impregnating underage girls, the wives and girlfriends of other men, stray skanks etc. without feeling the need to be tied down in raising any of the resulting offspring. Being stupid, they won't learn from their mistakes, so will likely continue their behavior even after serving time for statutory rape, incurring child support etc. Hence they have the potential to father dozens of children. How many children is an intelligent, decent man likely to have in modern society? Between zero and three perhaps.

Now consider a woman who gives birth to a son who takes after his stupid asshole father. She would reap a reproductive bonanza in grandchildren. Daughters of stupid assholes are also at a huge advantage. Smart women are now encouraged to become sterile corporate whores or other "career women" and have few if any children. Stupid asshole women can crank them out on welfare. If some of these are stupid asshole sons, their grandmother will once again reap a reproductive bonanza. Note that the children produced will be low quality scum lacking paternal or community support, but in modern society this is reproductively irrelevant, since Western regimes ensure that virtually all children survive to reproductive age, so female hindbrains have no reason to care.

Now, a woman is a relatively simple, biological robot designed to survive and reproduce in whatever environment she finds herself in. If she can vastly improve her reproductive fitness by f***ing stupid assholes, then this is what she will "want" to do.

This is why by far the most important qualities Western women are attracted to in men are stupidity and assholishness. "Game" consists mainly of acting like a stupid asshole. Sure other factors (looks, height, wealth etc.) come into it, but those are the main ones, and they are becoming more prominent over time. This is because a positive feedback loop occurs. The more reproductive advantage stupid assholes have, the more women find them attractive, so the more reproductive advantage they have and so on.

This situation only occurs in the first place because evil Western regimes create an environment that sustains it. It will end when the society is so corrupted by stupidity and assholishness that it can no longer sustain the system that gave rise to the problem. However, with modern technology the system is resilient, requiring the collaboration of just a handful of intelligent men to keep it going. By the time it collapses the gene pool may be complete shit and not survivable without the system. R.I.P. the human race. You were an interesting experiment that didn't really take.

Dave Rubin, Nick Fuentes, et al #wingnut twitter.com

Rubin: Conservatives must fight the impulse to regulate big tech. Competition, free markets and human ingenuity are the answer. Not taking one big problem and combining it with another big problem.

Will put a hold on your name for when you join http://Locals.com!

Fuentes: Hard to believe there are still people out there who are ignorant or dishonest enough to perpetuate the laughable idea that the “free market” will protect conservatives from big tech. The loudest advocates for “free speech” are almost always those who are the least likely to be censored and who are nowhere to be found when actually “dangerous” ideas are suppressed. Censorship protects the marketshare of safe, sterilized, uncontroversial goobers like Rubin.

EveryBodyHatesScott: Build your own google, build your own facebook, build your own bank, build your own credit card processing place...

Jack Jolis: We shldn't "regulate" Big Tech,
@RubinReport
, we shld break it up.

If TR was right to bust up ESSO, & we were right to do the same to "Ma Bell" (AT&T) in '82, both non-political

it make much MORE sense to bust up Google, Facebook, Twitter & YouTube--who CONTROL THE PUBLIC--today

squee: Hard to believe anyone thinks the free market will protect anyone from anything. It’s not the free market’s job, snowflake.

James Miller #sexist returnofkings.com

The Case For Gendo-Nationalism
image
James Miller is a political strategist and policy intellectual from New York City. He is the founder and president of the James Miller Foundation.

The alt-right and their leaders have often stressed the need for the establishment of a ethno-state on the North American continent. While I can understand many of their concerns as a middle-class white guy who lives in a gated community in the suburbs of New York City, I honestly do not have to deal with the minority problem on a day to day basis.

Whether the Bronx is being flooded with new arrivals is simply not my problem. Thots, on the other hand, affect us wherever we live. It doesn’t matter how great your neighborhood is or even how religious your state is. America has become a degenerate nation, and thottery has pervaded all aspects of American life—Northern and Southern, Protestant and Catholic, conservative and liberal, normie and alt-right.

image
A thot prepares to flash her breasts to a crowd of onlookers in a ‘conservative’ state in the Deep South.

Traditionalism Is Hopeless

Many on the right advocate for traditionalism. They think we can just return to the days of a nuclear family, reverse all three waves of feminism, and let women assume their traditional role. While I respect the arguments made by traditionalists, I have concluded that any sort of rollback is now politically impossible in the United States. We have lost the culture war. There is no going back. Sure, you can flee to a country where remnants of traditionalism still exist, but they are merely a little further back on the ongoing global shift towards female ‘liberation’ and the dissolution of family life.

Furthermore, while this problem has been substantially amplified in recent years, it is certainly not a modern one. Thots have consistently been the downfall of powerful men throughout history. John F. Kennedy was compromised by the Soviet Union as a result of depraved female temptresses. Even Adolf Hitler’s defeat in the Second World War can be attributed largely to the presence of Eva Braun. Cleopatra’s betrayal of Mark Antony the moment a more alpha chad arrived on the scene surely serves as one of the clearest demonstrations of the subversion of the opposite sex.

Richard Spencer similarly and correctly recognizes a return to the days of actual white supremacy is impossible and undesirable, and instead advocates for a white ethno-state, building on the momentum of left-wing identity politics movements. Although I respectfully disagree with him on that issue, his fundamental analysis is correct. We cannot return to an undefined point in the past when things were somehow better on the issues that we care about. All we can do is seek to influence the future. I have thus come to the conclusion that the only solution to our current thot debacle is peaceful separation between the sexes, and a resulting male gendo-state.

Now, this notion may sound absurd. Most traditionalists love and respect women, and simply wish for them to return to their historical place in society, rather than be done away with altogether. They must come to understand that separation has now become a necessity.

image
We may reach the point of open conflict with the opposing gender.

Separation Is Necessary

Cultural feminism has degraded women to the point where co-existence is a net negative to males. Women weaken men by their very presence, co-opting and hijacking even traditionalist movements by embracing the rhetoric and yet leaving much to be desired in terms of the personal example they set.

As the last few weeks have shown, women are able to completely destroy the reputations of decent, upstanding men through false accusations of sexual abuse. Women compete with us in a job market that is rigged against us by politicians who have come to see women as an essential voting bloc to appease. Women now even proudly declare that they do not need or want men in their lives.

Why don’t we put that to the test? Let us see how well the opposing gender fares when left completely to their own devices. In this way, we could use the rise of feminism as force of acceleration in order to promote our bid for nationhood. It is ironically fairly likely that the world’s first gendo-state will consist of pink haired female ogres LARPing as Amazons. But once the precedent is set, males will have a unique opportunity to seize the moment and build the case for our secession.

The Vision

Gendo-nationalism would involve near-total separation between men and women. A physical border would be erected between the respective male and female nation-states, and travel between these gendo-states would be tightly controlled and require permission from the governing authority of the gendo-state being entered. In the male gendo-state, which I have little doubt will be far more successful than its female competitor, male chauvinism will be the zeitgeist of the new order.

In addition, we need to think about the only real thing we need women for—sex. Advancements in robotics in recent years are quickly making this need obsolete. Future improvements in cloning technology may even allow us to replace women for the purposes of reproduction. Until the point at which a solution is devised, the gendo-state could have a work visa system which prostitutes and surrogates could utilize without permanent settlement in our new nation.

image
Soon, we will no longer need women to lead fulfilling sex lives.

The Path Ahead

Before we can have separation, we need to have a general sense of male identity. Now, I believe this to an extent to be inherent and hardwired, hence the presence of so many all-male social groups in our society. Nevertheless, we must promote the importance of masculinity and push close identification with our gender’s collective interests as a component of that.

Subsequently, we need to urge our fellow men to gradually start removing all emotional attachment to women. They’re to be seen as a tool, not a crutch. Emotional attachment makes men the weaker sex because women are inherently able to exploit it, and ensures the perpetuation of the anti-male status quo. Once it is overcome, the foundations for a gendo-state can be laid.

Free from the shackles of womankind, men will be able to embrace their true potential. We will have hours more in our days which would otherwise be wasted on entertaining vacuous thots. We will no longer be treated like second class citizens in the very nations we built and shed our blood for. Our inherent physical and mental supremacy will give us a substantial edge in the world marketplace. Much as ethno-nationalist movements played a major role in defining the 20th century, my hope is that gendo-nationalism will define the 21st.

David J. Stewart #conspiracy jesus-is-savior.com

If the Lord tarries His return, parents of the future will become mere incubators, producing servants of the State. Traditional families will become a thing of the past, and already today is is happening to a large extent. China's one-child policy began as a simple tax, and escalated into a crime punishable by forced abortion, sterilization, imprisonment, fines, and infanticide. The insane environmental agenda will be used to tax Americans for having too many children, which will eventually bring China's cruel tyranny and oppression to the United States. Mark my words.

I know my opinions are not very popular in today's apostate world, but they are Biblical. Feminism was spawned by Communism. Do a web search under “Feminism Communism” and see all the articles that come up. Feminism is destroying America, deceiving women to kill, steal, and destroy in the name of liberation and women's rights.

MuslimCell #god-complex incels.co

I will be the next saint of inceldom

I am dead serious . I will be the saviour , the one who will make you all ascend and guide you through the degeneracy we are living in . Wait for me and I will make the next incels cult and together we shall change the world , bring balance and make the world fair again . It's not over . Wait for my coming from the journey I am in , I will bring the fruit of ascension and share it with all of you , remain blackpilled and don't transgress my beloved brother . It's a hard journey I am in , things are challenging but I see the light up their , it was never about me but actually for each one of us I am on this struggle . wait for my coming and for you I will never give up . Love you all .

Wednesday #fundie moonbattery.com

I’m all for sterilization– Mandatory sterilization. As in, any person receiving welfare benefits gets sterilized. Before you get your EBT, TANF, WIC, etc., you get Norplant.

It is a humane solution to a pressing problem. It’s also more cost-effective than broken schools, devalued neighborhoods, multiple victims of violent crimes, and the expensive, ineffective penal system.

We are not a village, and it is not our responsibility to raise your children. No more Cash for Bastards.

Little Pink Pill #fundie message.snopes.com

[by Johnny Slick
What about slaughtering every man, woman, and child in a city because the city itself sits on a spot where God wants you to put your own city? I don't care how many "witnesses" you have for something like that; if that's God's will I don't see how one can call him omnibenevolent with any realistic usage of that term. ]

Those would certainly be considered war crimes by today's standards, but you do have to keep in mind the historical and political backdrop. Those cities which were completely demolished were those in which archeological evidence has uncovered a miriad of horrific crimes against humanity, including human trafficking, ritualistic child rape, and excruciating infant sacrifice on the molton arms of the god Molech. The "other gods" of the Old Testament that were forbidden to the Israelites were not gentle deities of peace, and their worshippers were compariable to the Aztecs in their life and practice.

Those were the days of revenge, as well. Look at the story of Esther. Haman, the man who basically tried to euthanize the Jews, was the descendant of a nation God had instructed Israel to completely destroy. They didn't, and it almost meant their own annihilation.

Some cities the Israelites were instructed to completley burn, as well, jewels, gold, linens and all, which makes you wonder about the possibility of diseases and plagues.

Ancient Israel would not have been a place I would like to live in comparison with today's world, but with its obligatory release of slaves, cleanliness laws, and forbidding of human sacrifice for ritual or sport, it was a heck of a lot nicer than most ancient societies.

various commenters #sexist incels.co

(BarredOut)
[Blackpill] BRUTAL BLACKPILL STORY

Sup boyos, I'm new here but I've been lurking the community since July. Today I wanted to share with you an absolutely brutal blackpill a chadlite friend told me yesterday.

So, about an year ago a few of my friends (two low tier 5-6/10 normies and two chadlites 7.5/10) went to a northern city in my country (EU) to have some fun an try to get some femoids. Basically this chadlite friend who told me the story already had a gf at the time, the other three didn't, and beware since this makes everything worse and obviously exposes femoids hypergamy even more.

So they go out in a club and try to approach some femoids. The other chadlite (the one which didn't have a gf) scored almost instantly, while the two low tier normies both approached the same girl but both failed miserably, first one then the other. My chadlite friend (the one with a gf) wasn't trying to score cause he wasn't interested since having a girlfriend.

Well, guess what the fuck happened. The girl who rejected both of the low tier normies spontaneously approached this friend of mine, sat on his lap, started acting slutty and eventually started making out with him, all by herself, he didn't even had to get his ass up from the chair. And keep in mind the two that got rejected are both looksmaxxed/gymcelled 5-6/10 normies, they both got rejected in turn, so imagine what it is like for us. And keep in mind my friend isn't even chad, he's a 7.5/10 5'8 chadlite, not even gymcelled.

JFL at normies saying that you actively have to try to get a girl, that you gotta do all the work, and that you gotta better yourself and pick up signs a girl might throw at you, lol.

Just a daily reminder that it is beyond over boyos, have a nice day.

(TheRealChincel)
Yeah, nothing revealing here to me but JFL @ thinking guys have to approach.

(Twisted)
And this place tries to act like normies don’t have it bad.

Incels have it far worse though I won’t deny that.

If NT normies get rejected then imagine how badly I’d get shut down considering I’m not NT

(RREEEEEEEEE)
Ok, so they're trying to get some degenerate whores. Not brutal or a blackpill to me, kek

(BarredOut)
wut? Did you read the rest? The blackpill is that they are normies and failed, while the chadlite did absolutely nothing and got the girl. Hence, imagine what it's like for us if normies get cucked like this. That was the point of the post.

(RREEEEEEEEE)
You're 6.5/10 if you looksmaxx naturally (just shaving, doing your hair) so you'd fare better than they'd do. But in a club.... kek, you're shit outta luck.

Yes, I did read the post. But I am anti-degeneracy, so what happens in a club doesn't bother me. Most of us are also aware that if you're good looking, girls approach you, and not the other way around. :p

(Raiden)
>clubbing

Never done this before

(BarredOut)
Don't do it. Having normie friends I've tried sometimes, it' absolutely degenerate and terrible if you're incel. It's literally a blackpill manifestation IRL. Drunk stacies acting as slutty as possible to attract all the chads, it feels unreal seriously. It's like seeing all the theories discussed here taking place in front of your eyes.

Eugenicist #sexist #wingnut incels.co

[Serious] Women are naturally leftist.

Women are attracted to degeneracy. To being laidback and loose in rigidity. Yet narcissism, and being uptight in terms of appearance. And yet if they ever grow old they can still rebound by being flowery and happy clappy (no serious rigid rules make it easier for them to be traversing the social sphere)
Women also like to have people be deluded under the propaganda of virtue, and not making blackpill realities of humanity's cynicism well known.

It is an incel trait to be a cynic, realist because women want to be vain and blinded by lookism. While there are no party pooping red pillers stopping the situation for what it is.

Women do not want to have to be bothered to be concerned with socialism.
Yet they're gravy training benefits, and go on vacation trips, and abuse their credit as if they don't give a fuck about socialism. They just pretend to for virtue veneering.

Ping And Pong #sexist #homophobia incels.co

[Blackpill] Reminder that most "lesbians" are infact chadsexuals

Link to article: https://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2017/04/19022/

I've always had my suspicions but now after some research I have found statistical evidence that 'lesbians' get pregnant way more often than straight girls. What this means is that most of these women would rather fuck each other instead of a non-chad.

These are the consequences of promoting degeneracy like LGBT, super hypergamous foids have a great excuse to never interact and reproduce with non-chads and the pool of available women to date is even smaller.

image

Darth_Aurelius #fundie incels.co

Why Nazi Germany was awesome

* It’s highest leadership were all essentially incel type men, though for different reasons – Goering was a morbidly obese morphine addict, Goebbels was a club footed manlet, Himmler looked like the epitome of a lanky jew and even the Fuhrer himself was very probably a life-long virgin and syphilitic through his mother.Despite these impediments, they acquired immense power and prestige through their intellect and rhetorical brilliance.
* Women were subordinated in every facet of society – they had to attend to the menial tasks which their biology and physiology has suited them for, "kinder, kuchen und kirchen" (kids, cooking and going to Church). No woman ever outranked any man in Nazi Germany, either socially (de facto) or in any of the paramilitary organizations (de jure). Thus, even the lowest ranking man was superior to all women, as it rightly should be.
* Aryan men who could not find or attract women for whatever reason were permitted to rape subhuman untermenschen type females with impunity both in order to satisfy the basic human need as well as to propagate more Aryan blood lines.
* Rank and status were not predicated on money nor were they reinforced by ostentatious displays of material wealth, as in the Jewnited States but rather were acquired by honorable and manly service to the state which all self respecting men should strive for.
* Degeneracy in all of its putrid and corrupting forms was cast out and destroyed by the Nazi party which understood that the people needed to be protected from the perverse influence of modern art, jew propaganda, homosexuality and any other cultural contaminants.

If that’s not enough, also bear in mind that his noble honor, Sir. Elliot Rodger admired the efficiency, glory and power of the mighty Third Reich. Sieg Heil.

Some incels #sexist #racist reddit.com

Re: Imagine having a daughter

image

(testaccountplsdontig)

Lmao, imagine what the reaction would be if this bitch was from literally any other culture. Her father would fly over to wherever she's residing in, and slap the shit out of her, and everyone would cheer.

But nope; in modern times, she's a strong woymn who's standing up against the tyrant father who....raised her and wished her happy birthday.

Respect your elders. Obey EVERY word they say, their words are almost always based, regardless of what culture they are from. Stop being a fucking degenerate.

(PedophileMurderer)

LOL at last paragraph. If you're an ethnic in the West you're probably suffering because of your parents who isolated you from your culture to force you in a situation where you have to integrate with people who instinctively hate you and women who you'll never be able to build a bond with even if they find you attractive because of the extreme culture difference. Add to that other low iq parents who produce mentally ill children and raise them on shit diets on their minimum wage and welfare doing their best to guarantee inceldom. Respecting elders by default is low iq and cucked

(plamplamthrow0321)

Who cares if her dad likes Trump. I don't even follow politics, nor do I follow Trump. She's the one that's toxic. What a fucking bitch.

Everyone on both sides is brainwashed about how 'effective' trump has been as a leader. Personally i've found him to be having little or no effect on business as usual in the us, for better or worse. It's astounding how liberals all think we're living under fascism now and righties all think the day of the rope is imminent. It all just seems like everyone is making up in their mind what is happening instead of looking at what's really happened, what policies have actually passed and where the money is going. I haven't felt like the country has changed much at all compared to Obama. If anything, people have just become bigger assholes and more prone to arguing over politics in areas of life where it is completely unnecessary.

The dating realm is the biggest change now. I just can't imagine dating someone and giving a shit what their politics are without knowing anything else about them. Yet, that's what people do, they automatically discount someone based on the political compass. To me its always the dumbest and weakest people that don't want to hear opposing points of view.

The damage Trump is doing will be seen in 5-10 years. That's typically how it is with these administrations.

It's only been 3 years. Regardless, you haven't been paying attention. The EPA is an obvious example of the damage he's making.

lmao ok

you're that same cuck that was whinging about me shitting on 'the left' 3 days ago.

the whole piont is trump isn't much different than obama. the epa does fuck all anyways at this point.

(BWC_Lover)

It's possible that while she's driving to meet her "Master", she accidentally loses control of her car and is sent into a spiral by a brief clash with another car, which incidentally was being driven by her father. It's possible that she suffers from brutal lacerations, burns, and suffocation in her car, before finally being burnt alive by an unlikely explosion. It's also possible that when her father's waiting outside his (only slightly dented) car, an awesome stray German Shepherd runs to him, plays a bit, then settles on the passenger seat of his car.

(PedophileMurderer)

Why are white women so disgusting?

Because at some point in history white men became fucking idiots.

meh nordics were always like this, eg read what romans (levantines) wrote about english natives, what we're witnessing is probably just regression fuelled by comfort

(plamplamthrow0321)

She probably tied her tubes already, she enjoys whoring around too much to risk that lifestyle getting ruined by kids.

No way man, white girls having mixed kids out of wedlock is progressive now. Even if she's a single mom they will be souvenirs for her to look back on her days as daddy's slave.

She will find some guy who's betamaxxing to handle the tab, ofc, and continue whoring around. Kids don't stop whores nowadays. If anything they just keep having kids and lonely simps "man up" for them. Or the gov't. does.

google her username. she's disgusting and looks retarded. her "master" is a liberal black supremacist.

but somehow cannot seem to find his way back to africa and keep his hands off white chix.

honk honk!

(FailAllAspects)

If i ever manage to ascend or betabux or whatever, i will NEVER have kids.

The age of degeneracy is upon us. It’s in full swing and will only get worse. The US is already a degenerate hellhole and it’s spreading everywhere, even the middle-east isn’t safe anymore.

You’re going to have to sit your ass down and shut the fuck up while your children indulge in whatever depravities they wish. If you EVER voice disapproval you will be met with “Yikes sweaty, stop your ABUSIVE and MISOGYNIST meddling with her life. She’s a fully GROWN AND INDEPENDENT 13 year old, and she can do bukkakes with Chadlets if she wants. You’re so insecure! So what if she wants a dildo?”

Remember, it’s a 🤡🌎. Nothing makes sense.

(Idk12344482305)

ITcels actually defend this.

At this point, I will just spend all my money on plane tickets to speed up global warming at least a little bit.

Whites should be exterminated.

(FantasticPressure1)

Please note her username: Cascadia

This is the region including Portland and Seattle, otherwise known as the Femtopia hellscape full of homeless and incel men. There are more homeless and incel men per capita here than anywhere in the US, possibly the world.

It's the region where the famed pussy slayer Ted Bundy, the man women masturbate to biopics of, reigned. That's your competition and who the women want. No they don't want a "nice guy" but you'll have the messages "reject gender roles, resist the patriarchy, down with toxic masculinity" shoved in your face by tattooed prostitutes. Actual prostitutes. Camgirl whores with nose rings.

An endless amount of information has been posted about this region but read what this slut writes, look at her tattoos, look how she hates her dad, and then understand that's "Cascadia." Incidentally, redditors love the place and it's pretty much 110% white. How can it be over 100%? You'd understand if you ever lived there. You sometimes see well-dressd asian, indian, and white dudes walking around like zombies because they're incel.

(Archmage_Saltcel)

"Reproductive rights" AKA the left-wing's foot in the eugenics doorway. Legalize abortion federally and you'll have designer babies within at least 10-20 years. Screenings for and aborting babies for "undesirable" traits will become the norm...If not outright law. Knowing democrats the "clump of cells" argument will be made into legal precedent and eventually expanded to encompass people of any age who become a problem to the government. Short? Abort. Ugly? Abort. Poor? Abort. Question anything a woman does ever? Abort.

It's a clown world when the people who "punch Nazis" are the ones trying to make Hitler's dream world a reality. NUKES WHEN?

Redshadowz #fundie city-data.com

No, Africa was always a craphole, and much of it is still a craphole.. well anything south of the Sahara anyway. Most of sub-saharan Africa was hunting with spears when we began colonizing it. The only places that have ever spawned any kind of civilization are along the mediteranean and the nile.

Solution? Like I said, I just think the entire world is better off being segregated. I mean, do we really want half this country filled up with muslims? Do you have any idea what kind of daily war that would be? Racial differences are kind of like that, but not quite as bad. It just feels like a perpetual war between us all, and no one is happy. Its just that everyone knows they are still better off here than somewhere else, so no one wants to leave.

Gymcelled #sexist incels.co

[Blackpill] Onlyfans will have as much impact as tinder and social media

Millions of men out there are willing to send money to foids just for nudes. You have to mentally retarded to pay for something you can get online for free wtf

Recently with corona and lockdowns, even more men are lining up to pay foids smh

In the coming years it'll be impossible to betabuxx. Because of all those simps and paypigs, tons of women will be making 6 figures just by showing their cunts a few times per month. You can bet they'll still be bitching about the wage gap though.

John Doe #fundie wehuntedthemammoth.com

Adams is so great. Fuck all you dirty piece of shit feminists you should be FUCKING SHOT or sterilized. or sent to a rehabilitation facility.
You should lose your right to vote. Ignorance is dangeorus. and Feminism is evil ignorance. Feminism is not about equal rights and has not been for many decades. Maybe if this was the 1960s america you could say something to me, but now you can shove it up your fucking ass. Fuck american womena nd fuck feminism.
Men will stop getting marreid more and more. THe spawn of the MGTOW groups are evidence of this.
The government is getting what they want. People to stop breeding.
I think every feminist should be sent to a labor camp or imprisoned or shot dead. I don’t care. You are scum and if you are not capable of changing you should lose your right to live. All humans are a burden to the earth, but Feminists are a burden to all humans and everything else, especially men.
Women are treated like children and coddled with kid gloves and in some ways you always have been.
Even in 1890 there was a female bandit in the west that did crazy shit and got away with it for years. But there were men that did the same that were shot dead instantly.
And men have always fought the wars. Women rarely in any society ever had to do so. You got to stay home. You got the easier job.
The only way now for a normal guy to have a healthy relationship with a girl under 30 in the new generation is to scare the shit out of your woman and make her fear you and make her think you will end her life if she tries to screw you over. That is the only way to keep them in line from being destructive bitches. And even then you might have to sit them down and threaten them now and then.
I had to, i’ve had to with the last girl i dated. all the time.
Look what happened when i didn’t. She told her friend i was a drug dealer simply because she was jealous she liked me. She publically slandered me. So i used her took her virginity which honestly id trade for her hotter friend at this point.
Unless you are rich and powerful and good looking youre only real option to have a good time and enough control that you can relax is to scare the shit out of these girls, find some way to blackmail them or scare them and use it. That is the only way.
Even without me saying any of this it remains true and feminism has destroyed the country and everyone born from the 90s onward.
David Futrelle is a piece of shit beta male and should lose his right to vote among other freedoms for supporting such a piece of shit ideology.
The US and Canada and most 1st world countries are female dominated all the way up to the super rich who then are the men having power but everyone who is not rich is ruled and controlled by females if they want any kind of success. Period.
Unless you do as I was saying before, find a way to scare a girl and blackmail her into doing what you want. Because even if she likes you, even if you are perfect for her, she would rather run away and flirt with many other guys and fuck things up. So scare her into submission.

Various Incels #sexist #psycho #pedo incels.co

RE: [SuicideFuel] [NSFW] This is what Chad gets to do with prime teenage girls while you rot alone in your room

(AAAAAAAAAAAcel)

I have a great want to put a bullet into that guy's skull, piss on his corpse, rape the foid and then piss on the foid

(Words2_live_bye)

NOO NO NO NO ON FUCK FUCK FUCK
I HATE EVERYONE
FUCK YOU ALL
AGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH GIVE ME TEENAGE PUSSY

(Robtical)

Whoever sees this and still thinks whores deserves to vote and get our tax money needs to be bitch slapped.

One of my dreams is touching a girls ass. And these chads get to do it for free.

I need me a girl with a fat ass. I only need one thing

You're not entitled to a girl with a fat ass inkel.
But they're entitled to your tax money.

(Ultimatepassivecel)

Real teen girls are busy doing shit like this while soyboys in IT are shitting on us for finding fictional 17 year olds attractive

(FUCKITALLREEE)

"Prime" jfl she looks like a 20 something roastie that ride the cock carousel since high school.

whatever helps you survive through another day

If you thinks she is special and/or prime, you have to put your simp glasses off. 20 years old are already been used up by many chads.

They're all used up, and you'd fall for them in a heartbeat if they gave you the attention and validation you crave.

As a truecel it is impossible for them to feel attraction towards me, and even if i would win the lottery and some hoe try to come by, i know too much about the blackpill and foid nature to fall for any bullshit front they put up.

Alice Friedmann #fundie smoloko.com

WHAT WOULD HAVE BECOME OF AMERICA IF NATIONAL SOCIALISTS WON WW2?

1. The Federal Reserve and all usurious banking would be halted immediately and replaced by debt-free currency backed by the hard work of the American man – not Gold

2. Hollywood would be shut down and replaced by patriotic Americans who cared deeply about our history, our people and the upholding of high moral standards.

3. Jews would be banned by law from working in many sectors, their Jewish identity should be shown when applying for Jobs, or they might be rounded up and deported to a homeland of their own where they would be isolated by the force of the US Military.

4. Israel would not have existed in 2016, simply because Israel power does not come from Israel, but from the Jewish lobbies ruling the western world. Israel would have been destroyed long time ago by the Arabs.

5. Education on the Jewish question would become mandatory and perpetual in the understanding that they must never, at any time in the future, be allowed to subvert the Western world again.

6. Capitalism & Communism destroyed, no oligarchs anymore, the government will take care of citizens from birth to death, free Universities, free health care… Bund Deutscher Mädel and Hitlerjugend will be implemented to educate youth on the love of nation, family, nature, sports…

7. The promotion of any and all kinds of perversions and degeneracy would be treated as an attack on the family thus an attack at the very foundation of civilization and the nation itself and as such would be ruthlessly crushed and suppressed. The blasphemy on Christianity & Islam would be banned by law.

8. Racial tensions, and Multiculturalism done only on European-ethnic majority countries would have been abolished, and by that the European race living all over the western world & USA would have been protected from the planned extinction by the Jewish-made miscegenation propaganda, homosexual propaganda, feminist propaganda

9. Democracy would be replaced with Meritocracy: Leaders would be chosen based on ability rather than on who could get the most campaign donations given by Jewish-run Banks, corporations & organizations.

10. The border to Mexico would be sealed. It would be announced that any illegal caught crossing the border would be shot. Poverty in the world is a cumulative problem that needs decades if not a century to be solved, it will never be solved by economic & illegal immigration which is a Jewish weapon to destroy the western people power to resist the Jew World Order

11. Arabs & Africans would become much more rich and happy because
American Jewish-Rothschild-Zionist interventions, wars and corruptions would have been abolished forever

12. EU Union, TPP, TTIP, NATO, UN and all Jewish made unions and globalization for the world government would have not existed

Illimitable Man #fundie reddit.com

Single mothers are complete and utter mother fucking subhuman scum 99.9% of the time. If she's not a widow, she's scum. The statistics for kids raised by single mothers shows all manner of dysfunction (poverty, mental illness, crime) for kids raised by single mothers, but not widows. So as far as I'm concerned widows are cool it's not their fault the dad died, they're not making bad decisions but shit happens.

But single mothers - they play the victim angle like a motherfucker and all the SJWs/politically correct bluepillers make the wild fucking assumption that it's not the woman's fault, revoking all agency or blame from the dumb silly bitch who chose to raise a kid alone. But the sheep don't see it like that, they start making all these wild accusations that the father was probably abusive or violent and that's why she raised the kid alone.

It's presumed the mother is a victim of circumstance even though 99% of the time she created the circumstances she's in not only for herself, but for her kid(s.) And it's presumed the father is an asshole, but most the time he was a horny guy begged not to use a condom and told she was on the pill when she wasn't. So she gets pregnant and keeps the kid. Sometimes these guys don't even know they have a kid until they get a child support notice out of thin air. Then the poor guy gets fucking berated for being a deadbeat when all he did was fuck a woman under the presumption it was recreational sex and that no baby would be born.

If bitches are deceiving guys into fatherhood, and then crying victim when it backfires because he refuses to defer to her deceit, tough shit for her. The only victim here as far as I'm concerned is the child. She tricked the guy she fucked, tried to force him to become a parent, and when he wouldn't, tried to ruin his reputation and extract wealth. That is some fucked up shit. But hardly anybody sees it from that perspective, do they? Naturally, bitches be crazy and society is all jumped up on the sycophancy of feminism and the woman are wonderful effect, so she's blameless and he's just a cunt. People are so single-minded and intent on blaming the father it's unbelievable. If your father is never there for you growing up, there's a good fucking chance that's your mothers fault.

But no, everyone acts like she's this marvellous creature for forcing her kid(s) to struggle for THEIR ENTIRE LIVES. And that the guy is probably some dark triad woman/kid abusing asshole.

It's total fucking bullshit. Very few men are violent or abusive, that's complete lying utter horseshit used to smear the male name and justify the child abuse that is raising kids without a father.

No, the truth is, mummy was somebody's plate/one night stand and thought it would be a wise idea to not use protection AND THEN keep the kid. Her body, her choice, right? Does this oft gloated feminist principle not fucking extend to the responsibility of giving and raising life too?

It makes me sick how everybody rallies to the aid of single mothers and exclaims how hard they have it and how everyone should feel sorry for them. Fuck that. Fuck them. They had a choice didn't they? I mean a whore has a fucking choice to take a pill, or get an implant or terminate. Or a million other things. The kid had no fucking choice to be born and go through all the dysfunction that awaits it. The kid is a total innocent and the mother, a cunt.

I reserve all my sympathy for the boys and (to some extent, the girls) who grow up fatherless and fucking despise the child-abusing fucks that single mothers are. They are total fucking scum contributing to the complete and utter degeneracy of our society morally, spiritually, socially and economically. Total fucking scum. Again, it is total bullshit that the huge amount of kids who have no father all had asshole fathers who abused the mother/kid when most men in society are complete fucking betas. That's just not plausible. This is simple female blame-shifting mixed with misandry.

I have 0% empathy for these broads. How the fuck can I when I see how they destroy their children? Only the children are blameless. Their sons are welcome on TRP and their daughters, RPW. If you are the son of a single mother, don't worry. We got you. And single mothers who for whatever reason read TRP, you're like HIV - a fucking pathogen.

Golden #sexist incels.co

[It's Over] Cuckoldry is getting more common in my country at a frightening rate

I remember that about 5-6 years ago or so, if a woman in a relationship were to hang out with a male friend often, she'd be shamed, such actions most certainly were not welcomed. 5 years of western social media influence later, and now "letting your girlfriend sleep with her best friend" is completely normal, sexual degeneracy is the epitome of civilization, and if you disagree, you are a narrowminded islamist bigot
I reckon in another 5 years, married women will start whoring around freely, claiming that they are expressing themselves, even now I see some cucks saying that their girlfriends sleeping around is fine as long as there's no emotional connection. Future is dark for us, all of us

values are fading away everywhere, even here in north africa and other muslim lands, the fact that degeneracy is getting worst in countries like ours is the ultimate prove of the decline of civilization and values.

It's only going to get worse

Where do you live? Even in America, actual cucking is looked down upon by most people.

Turkey, and actual cucking is looked down upon here aswell, but we are slowly getting there

Things will change and we'll go back to slut shaming whores again after more men get blackpilled.

I wholeheartedly hope so

If she’s got a “guy friend” and already has a boyfriend it was already over tbh.

Majority of the girls of my generation are like that

I just realized that the two guys with the most posts on this forum are both from turkey. Does this make u feel proud?

Not proud, it makes me feel hopeless, jfl at us, we are the incel central of the world

Letting your girlfriend sleep with her beat friend would be considered insane in the UK and I’m pretty sure our state is worse than Turkey, are you sure you’re not just taking cherrypicked articles to be the norm?

I didn't mean sleeping as in sexual intercourse, but sleeping on the same bed with a male friend, they claim that sleeping with one another doesn't have to be sexual

RadiantUpstairs #sexist reddit.com

Re: Two atomic blackpills dropped on unsuspecting normies

image

This "evolutionary pressure" explanation is just post-factum rationalization, but damn it works.

How is that? Women have to carry the child inside them for 9 months and most always are the one to raise it if things don’t work out. There is way more of a reason they would be concerned with good genetics than a dude.

It's giving a pseudorational veneer to their ethical degeneracy.

It's basically the same sort ofrationalization you'd give for any eugenics project.

The ethical must be paramount. Women are unethical eugenicists who deny the means of reproduction to males they deem life unworthy of life.

If we had a system where women who wouldn't put out were left to starve in the street, would that be found ethical? Of course not.

You must understand how deeply abused men are, to think women can do no wrong, even when men are being denied the necessaries of life.

”its a pseudorational veneer to their ethical degeneracy”

Ethical degeneracy? Its literally just foid nature.

“its a rationalization for a eugenics project”

You realize most species are naturally eugenic right? Us included.

“women are unethical eugenecists who deny men reproduction”

They can argue being forced to reproduce with men they dont want is unethical. You're making the case for monogamy and patriarchy completely incorrectly.

“you must understand how deeply abused men are”

I do but i also wont call the reasons for why its reality immoral or "ethical degeneracy". It is simply the way of human beings. Patriarchy abd monogamy was a good solution while remaining ethical because it paired looksmatches and gave both men and women the ability to move up in looksmatch bit by bit per generation.

Yes, OK, you can deny the ethical, that is fine.

Most species are not eugenic, most species do not have any ethics involved in reproduction. Eugenics is an ethical system. A male primate might be fought off by a stronger male primate, or by a group of female primates, but that is not eugenics, it's not like that male primate has been indoctrinated to believe he needs to wait for the woman's approval.

Eugenics is a psychological system backed by violence; primates do not develop systems of psychological control at the cultural level.

Eugenics is a cultural phenomenon, to reduce all mating behaviour, because sometimes you win, sometimes you lose, in every animal species, to eugenics, is to miss the essential nature of eugenics.

Eu, good, genos, kind. Eugenics is involved in intentional selection of "good traits." Even if nonhuman primates, and other animals, are involved in trait selection, they're not doing it because they think those traits "good," they have no scienter, knowledge of good and evil.

Anonymous MG #sexist incels.co

Cucks have always, and will always, be the main driving force behind social degeneracy and a decline in male conditions as long as they're allowed to keep existing in society. Before, these types of men would succumb to disease or be killed fighting a war, as the masculine men would survive and reproduce up until the advent of modern medicine and "the long peace".

These weak men will cause a societal collapse soon enough with their awful values and ideals, and we'll have to rebuild and try again soon enough. This is the cycle of civilization, and these are the unforeseen consequences of social reforms that enforce "equality".

Coronachan pls save us pewpew

Beer_Grills #sexist reddit.com

Blackpill of the day: Chad landmines are everywhere

If you manage to looksmax and socialmax, and crawl your way out of inceldom and finally get a girlfriend, be aware of omnipresent Chad landmines. And this is also a warning to the beta normies lurking this sub.

One day if Chad is bored and horny, and notices your mildly attractive or even ugly girlfriend, and he gets the idea in his head that he wants to pump and dump her in a sloppy one night stand. Chances are 80-90% that he will be able to do that.

And it's not exactly uncommon these days, there are millions of feral Chads running around who had no proper parenting and will do this kind of stuff just because they are bored.

There's also a high chance he won't use protection and she will give birth to his demon spawn. Which she will likely claim to be yours, and you'll end up raising his child as a beta cuck provider.

PS! This is why you looksmax and gymcel. If you do get a gf eventually, then you want to be able to physically dominate or at least match potential Chads and tell them to fuck off.

PPS! This is not meant to discourage incels from trying to get laid or get a gf. It doesnt discourage me. This is just a blackpill reality. Infidelity is real and more common now than ever. Better to accept it now than be ignorant and shocked if/when it happens.

Makeshift Alpha Male #fundie makeshiftalpha.com

I declare we SHOULD shame single mothers.

(Without the fathers consent and an inability to support it herself)

Okay sounds horrible right. However if you agree with the premise that this is a problem and this is on the increase and without something being done, we are most likely going to end up in a country / world in a complete mess. At some point we will need to do something about it. Here are the other options that spring to mind:

Forcing sterilization / abortions.

Well we can’t afford them, we can’t feed ourselves any more. We need to stop them before the kid is born. You can either start sterilizing people and get them to apply to have it reversed or we can start state enforced abortions.

Leaving children to starve in the street.

Stop all funding to help children and let them starve in the streets. This is already pretty common place in 3rd world countries and we know how pretty that looks.

Start killing people.

People are getting in this nasty habit of living longer and longer these days and if we are pumping out more and more kids that are just so damn cute. then we need to get rid of some of the people that kicking around. We could do this on a merit based system, money based system or just get rid of anyone over a certain age

throwaway680603 #fundie reddit.com

If I had the following then I wouldn't be incel

If I was rich and drove a mercedens benz

If I had confidence of an alpha

If I wasnt ugly

If i wasnt an ugly ogre

woe is me

if i wasnt clinged with girls who have girls orbiting around them all the time

if i didnt have to get raped metaphorically as guys around my age post pics online of themselves dating

if i didnt have to be a sneaky rat-looking guy

woe is me

if i didnt have to live in this society but rather in 5000 bc where the strongest is the leader

if i didnt have to live in this degeneracy society where hook up culture is present

if i could get women to not think of me as a creep

if girls could just start talking to me

woe is me

TheIncelRepublic #sexist #wingnut #psycho incels.co

Anyone just want to live in a total utopia patriarchy?

Now for as long as humanity has existed we have never lived in a total patriarchy, women in history had some degree of rights.

But we ended up hypothetically take over society and put in extreme patricarcal laws.

So, we should only let women into the workforce making up 100% of workers with the exception of military, government, police, doctors and other high ranking jobs. Every male is given a government mandated wife/gf to breed with. All other men who aren't high IQ or don't want higher wages can become certified NEETs. Every male NEET will receive a free wife/gf , a free house, $3000 from the government each month, and a free education. Men can only be citizens, all other countries have to cooperate in the equal distribution of women as a source of labor and breeding

Women aren't allowed to go to school unless they need to use the education for their work. If she doesn't need it, she is not allowed to read or do any math.

Women aren't allowed to show any skin in public.

Women are not allowed to be near unneutered animals.

No abortions and birth control is only provided by their male leaders.

Women aren't allowed to vote or have a say in government.

Obey their male leaders whatever they say and adhere to their immediate commands, if the male demands sex, she has to give sex no matter what.

Women aren't allowed to chose their sex partners, but men are allowed to chose which women they want through government assisted selection process.

Tinder, porn and all other female degeneracy is banned. She has to have no male friends, and she has to not speak to anyone unless she is given permission too.

Any violation to these rules will result in extreme and harsh measures by the government to put these women back in line.

She is not entitled to food, shelter, water, affection, Chad or any basic human rights for that matter.

All men are entitled to human rights.

If there is an excess of men then we are to genetically create more eggs and sperm that will have a higher likely spawn rate of more women in the womb.

The wife/gf goes to work with the other women and makes a wage which is automatically transacted to your bank account and taxed by the government to fuel the welfare state. When she comes home from waging, she cooks dinner and cleans the house for the family and she has to feed you tendies and fries on your bed and have sex at the same time while you are watching a movie or playing a game. She also has to take care of your children when they come home from daycare. She is your property and you should do what you want with her as you wish. If you decide to get rid of her she is to be handed back to the government as "used goods" if she isn't virgin and essentially a slave to work without a wage as free labor.

But what if the women rebel against their male overlords?

Males will still be in the military, and I think you can put two and two together.

I think this my dream and comfy utopia right here.

Octavian #fundie goingyourownway.com

Im no Issac Asimov, so bear that in mind when reading this.

Personally, I think marriage will go the way of the mechanical typewriter.Some folks of certain religious or traditional socieities & families thereof will do so, but for the most part it'll fade into history.

As others have noted marriage is becoming obsolete, although IMO the pressure will come from females vs males. There arent enough unplugged men to make a dent in the matriarchy- for every committed man who leaves the system ten more become shackled to it.Rather women will be so disgusted by the spineless fem-dudes their moms created that they'll be repulsed at the notion of shacking up with any 'guy'.I live in a rural area of America and am amazed at the general feminized nature and thinking of average guys nowadays.Forget about urban cities. At times walking through and interacting with people in LA made me feel like I was Don Draper time travelling to 2015.Why the hell would a female shack up with a dude who knows less about a car motor and spends more time in the bathroom prepping then she does?

"Money,duh" you might say in response.
But you dont need a marriage to do that.A simple cohab arrangement is enough in many places, and fairly soon the governments of the world will get hip to the fact that the dudes who dont have women in their lives have a LOT of disposable income . If 80% of the dudes in society are unattached beta males with no kids and no wife, fairly soon someone's gonna realize taxing those guys will pay for a lot of Mr Thundercock's progeny.

Thats how things went in ancient Rome, and thats how things are likely to play out for us.We'll be served with a summons to present proof of gay marriage ,alimony expenses paid ,a court order for child support or a documented relationship with a female....or pay a 40% income tax until we do.The reason?

"All men should share the burden to pay for child support, because patriarchy.Whats more important-a kid or your classic 1965 Mustang restoration?"

At first to sell the "Bachelor Tax" theyll apply it to females as a gesture of "equal burden", but that'll be a non-binding price ceiling. They'll find a beta to happily vouch for being in a relationship so she can dodge the taxman, who wont be encouraged to enforce female recievables due anyways .

Meanwhile , we single dudes will be looking over our shoulders every time we use an ATM.Next floor in the elevator of decline after that is polyamory-ive already seen a few examples of this in LA.One woman in a relationship with a harem of dudes who exclusively 'date' her in return.

The financial squeeze will justify part of this. Want to dodge the 40% bachelor tax, Mister Bluepill? Go find a bored fat girl who's willing to vouch for you to the IRS that you're a taken man.Of course nothing is free in this world......and you'll have to prove to Miss Fatso you have the commitment required to join her roster.

As for the alpha's, itll be a lonely club-moving between harems means pissing off a few women. Itll be the lowest social category of public society; staying out of jail & poverty will mean fake ID's and quick feet.Plate spinning for males will require CIA tradecraft to avoid imprisonment.

I hope we dont suffer a Big Collapse ; the only thing worse then living in a matriarchy is wandering a post-industrial disaster filled with desperate bluepill males ,ruthless whores ,and easy accessed personal weapons with no law or order.You think guys are thirsty simps NOW....just wait until a society of feminized she-dudes have to figure out how to live without Amazon Prime and extended warranties. Just remember-most forms of pornography require electricity to work. As does the production of birth control.

Corey Savage #sexist returnofkings.com

7 Ways Modern Women Treat Men Like Dogs

Corey is an iconoclast and the author of ‘Man’s Fight for Existence’. He believes that the key to life is for men to honour their primal nature.

For all the feminist criticism of men supposedly treating women like dogs, it is actually today’s feminism-infected women that are treating men like domesticated animals.

While the majority of women still prefer masculine men for relationships, I’ve been noticing how more and more women today are defying their biology for ideological reasons and are pursuing long-term relationship with men they’re not even attracted to just because they are supplicant and effeminate. If this trend continues unabated, I expect the entire male population to turn into weak and feckless bonobos who grovel around to serve female interests.

Observe the following comparisons to see how men are being turned into dogs for both women and the state:

1. Dogs are optional

Dogs as pets are optional. People get a dog only when they want one; it’s not a necessity. Men today are also increasingly becoming an object of utility for a woman rather than a man whom she forms a bond with for a nuclear family. She will marry a man when she wants to (if at all) and she will dump him when she feels like it.

2. Once attached, dogs offer unconditional loyalty

If you want a picture of what the feminists want from men, just imagine a world where all men are male feminists.

Once dogs have a human to call a master, it doesn’t care whether he is a scumbag, loser, criminal, or homeless. Dogs are faithful no matter who their master is and what he does. In fact, they’re so loyal that they’ll even remain with an owner that mistreats them. And that’s exactly what feminists want men to be.

If you observe the rhetoric of the feminists, you’ll notice two general themes: first, the desire to be free from all criticisms. And second, for men to believe them and “support” them no matter what. Feminists want their prospective low-testosterone boyfriends and husbands to fully accept them for who they are no matter how disgusting, slutty, crass, and toxic they are. They want their men to show unconditional loyalty so that they can openly cheat on them and brag about it. And men, if they don’t want to be called a misogynist, must never question their partner’s past or present behavior and remain faithful even if they’re treated like garbage.

3. Dogs do what they’re told

Once the owner has secured his dog’s loyalty, he can train it to behave on command. Some owners enjoy the power they have over their companions and they will order their dogs around for fun.

Western women today have discovered that there are truck loads of desperate men who will do just about anything for them to win an ounce of female approval. These women have successfully used men to take them out on expensive dinners (only make fun of them on their blogs afterwards), buy pizza for them for free, shovel snow for them, and so on. The women who order these men around like dogs didn’t even have to train them as they’ve already been conditioned from birth by the society to do what women tells them to do.

4. Dogs are treated for good behavior
image
Dogs need to be treated to reinforce good behavior; the same is true when you want to domesticate men as second-rate citizens.

Women understand just how desperate the general male population is for affection and sex. Women today are leveraging this power over men to make them behave the way they want them to, rewarding these simps with faked compliments so that they’ll continue being good boys.

5. Dogs defend their masters
image
One serves a man, the other serves the government and its harem of women.

Besides companionship, the main roles dogs play is to defend their masters. In spite of all the calls for equality, the reality is that women still expect men to defend and save them. The men suffering from white knight syndrome will go as far as sacrificing their own lives to rescue women they don’t even know.

Feminists also don’t mind that many men are serving the police and military force to serve their alpha boyfriend: the government. Women are innately attracted to power and the government is the new protector and provider of women that grows bigger and stronger each day while ordinary men are becoming weaker and irrelevant.

6. Dogs are neutered

Although men aren’t getting physically neutered the way dogs are, other methods are being employed to psychologically castrate men. This includes the epidemic use of ADHD drugs to tame boys, ridiculous laws aimed at controlling men’s sexual interactions with women, and the overall cultural currents to shame masculinity while promoting all sorts of degeneracy that dilute it. Today’s wives don’t even want to get sexual with their husbands.

7. Dogs that are not domesticated are pests

“Masculine men are organizing a meeting? They must be rapists!”

When a dog is not owned by a human being, it is considered a pest that needs to be controlled.

Men today who do not submit to the feminist agenda are constantly attacked as being losers, sexists, misogynists, rapists, and so on. In today’s feminist society, you either serve the female imperative or you’re a Neanderthal who is out of touch with the times. Steps are already being made to control every aspect of male behavior in public.

You should also remember that dogs are natural pack animals (think of their cousins, wolves). By being removed from the pack, they become isolated and dependent on their masters. Can you see how the same applies for today’s men?

The Differences

In addition to being dogs, men are also expected to serve as drones to keep the feminist nanny-state running.

In spite of all the similarities, there are differences that need to be addressed.

First, unlike dogs whose owners house them and feed them, men are not supported by women. Women are free to throw men away like used tampons or divorce their husbands to extract their cash. If anything, men are usually the ones who must provide for their wives.

Second, whereas dogs are under the responsibility of their owners, men are expected to be fully responsible in all their interactions with women. It is the man’s job to ensure that a woman is giving consent even if both parties are drunk; it is men who must watch over their own behavior to ensure that what they say is non-offensive and conforming; and it is men who must ensure that women feel perfectly safe and comfortable in all their interactions. If you so much as walk past a woman in the wrong manner, you’ll be accused of rape. Again, it is the man’s responsibility to ensure that he is acceptable enough to share the same space as women, not the other way around. Feminists want “equality” without accountability.

Are men becoming collectively domesticated?
image
The domesticated cows we see on farms didn’t end up the way they are now naturally. It was through thousands of years of herding and selective breeding that they became smaller, more passive, and accepting of their conditions. But the fact is, it doesn’t take thousands of years to transform entire species. In this article which I recommend you read, a Soviet project to domesticate foxes have shown that it only takes several generations of selective breeding to transform wild foxes into effeminate and tamed versions of themselves.

The global testosterone level around the world has been mysteriously dropping for the past few decades. While chemical toxins in all the products we consume and come in contact with has been given as one possible explanation, I wouldn’t be surprised to find out that we as species are gradually becoming emasculated at a genetic level through the selective breeding process. In other words, we are becoming socially engineered to be effeminate. It’s not something impossible when you consider that easily tamable beta males, the sperm donors, are usually the males women select as their mates after they themselves are done riding the cock-carousel. I think it’s a factor we should consider besides the emasculation through cultural degeneracy that we’re already familiar with.

Men are supposed to be men unleashing their primal energy through raw adventure instead of getting tamed into submission. I have no doubt that the systematic domestication efforts of today is what is causing collective male nihilism, depression, and frustrated energy. Men who are awake must allow themselves be men.

If you like this article and are concerned about the future of the Western world, check out Roosh's book Free Speech Isn't Free. It gives an inside look to how the globalist establishment is attempting to marginalize masculine men with a leftist agenda that promotes censorship, feminism, and sterility. It also shares key knowledge and tools that you can use to defend yourself against social justice attacks. Click here to learn more about the book. Your support will help maintain our operation.

Michael Slay #racist archive.is

It’s been all over the news lately, and it’s something that every European is talking about: thousands and thousands of inferior mud-blooded subhumans have been flooding into Europe by the boat loads. Eager for welfare money to spend on drugs, White women to rape, tourists to mug, and buildings to bomb in the name of their goat-fucking prophet, these primal, feral nigger savages have become like a cockroach infestation on the once-great European continent. Except they are much, much worse than cockroaches. Cockroaches can be easily dealt with, and they damage they cause is relatively minimal.

The nigger virus, however, is much more destructive. Cockroaches only destroy houses, but niggers destroy entire nations—and, if we let them, these primitive apes will destroy the entire world.

How do we deal with cockroaches, one might ask? Well, we don’t welcome them in. We don’t argue with them or try to reason with them either. We exterminate them. When you encounter a parasite, you eliminate it. Why, then, shouldn’t Europe exterminate the vermin flooding into the continent from third-world garbage cans? If we exterminate termites because they destroy the foundations of our houses, why shouldn’t we also exterminate niggers, who destroy the foundations of our societies? Niggers have proven time and time again that they are nothing more than an absolute scourge on human civilization. One can take a look at these well-sourced facts about niggers if they aren’t well-versed in the dangerous nature of the nigger plague. Niggers are a savage, feral, primitive, violent, and unfathomably destructive breed of vermin. In any area they inhabit, crime goes up tremendously. When they become the majority, their surroundings become a third-world dump just like Africa. One need look no further than parts of the US where niggers are the majority—places like Detroit and Ferguson are virtually indistinguishable from the ape dwellings in Africa. In Europe, too, niggers have proven themselves to be the worst vermin imaginable. Thanks to an infestation of niggers from Somalia, the once-Swedish city of Malmö is now one of the most dangerous cities in the world, with weekly shootings, stabbings, arson attacks, and grenade bombings. Recently, a feral nigger from Eritrea stabbed two humans to death in an IKEA store in Stockholm. The more niggers there are in Europe, the more these attacks will continue to happen.

In Israel, niggers are treated like the vile cockroaches that they are. Niggers in Israel are locked up in concentration camps, forcibly sterilized, and then shipped off to White nations like Sweden and Australia. That’s because Israel knows very well how destructive niggers are, and they know how niggers destroy cities and eventually nations. If you ask me, Israel isn’t nearly harsh enough on niggers. Niggers shouldn’t just be sterilized and deported. Niggers should be exterminated altogether. Every single worthless nigger needs to be rounded up into cattle cars, shipped off to gas chambers, and slaughtered like cattle. The only possible use for niggers would be to conduct medical experiments on them. We can’t experiment on humans because our ethics prevent us from conducting experiments that cause significant pain. But, since niggers aren’t human, we can cause as much pain as we want. We can cut open pregnant niggers, we can chop up nigger babies, we can inject nigger children with all sorts of unstable chemicals—hell, we can do whatever we want to these subhuman beasts. And, by conducting medical experiments on niggers, we can obtain medical knowledge that will ultimately be useful in providing medical assistance for humans. Not only that, but it would also be a lot of fun to do. Could there be anything more satisfying than the helpless screams of a nigger child as it’s torn apart by human doctors? I certainly can’t imagine anything more enjoyable. If Europe had any sense, it would be slaughtering niggers en masse, keeping only a few alive to conduct medical experiments on (and then killing those niggers once they’re no longer useful).
European man, do you want your once-great continent to become a third-world cesspool like Africa? Do you want your race, your heritage, and your nation to be replaced with primitive apes who rape your women and burn down your cities? Do you want to be beheaded in the streets by the feral monkeys that your tax dollars feed and clothe? If not, then you have not only the right, but the DUTY to engage in violence against these parasitic nigger savages. The only way to stop the infiltration of Europe is to use lethal force on unarmed civilians. That means shooting children and women, as the African infiltrators will hide behind their women and their children. You need to start killing niggers, and you need to start doing it right now. You need to indiscriminately slaughter niggers, whether they’re muscular nigger men or little nigger babies. You need to blow up nigger churches, shoot up nigger preschools, and burn down refugee centers. You need to butcher newborn African babies in hospitals, and you need to stomp on nigger babies right in front of their parents. You need to take guns into mosques and kill every single worthless goat-fucking nigger and sandnigger you can. You need to cut open pregnant niggers, rip their fetuses out, and stick their fetuses on pikes all over the border as a warning to other niggers about what awaits them. You need to get a flamethrower and burn niggers alive at the refugee centers. Kill niggers of all ages, from little nigger babies to little nigger old ladies. Remember: niggers are not human beings, and the life of a nigger has no more value than the life of a flea or a tick. If you do not exterminate these worthless apes, they WILL exterminate you.

These vermin need to be exterminated before they exterminate Europe.
It’s time for a Final Solution to the nigger problem, Europe. The only way to deal with these filthy subhuman beasts is to slaughter every single one of them like the worthless vermin that they are. The only good nigger is a dead one. So, what are you waiting for? You have nothing left to lose, European man. Go out right now and get this Final Solution started. Do you want your mother to be raped and beheaded by niggers while you die in a suicide bombing? Do you want Europe to become the new Somalia? Or do you want to be a martyr for White Europeans around the world as a bold, courageous man who stood up and fought against the subhuman invasion? Your governments have betrayed you. The only thing left for you to do is to FIGHT BACK against this nigger plague—fight back before it’s too late! Get guns, get knives, get bombs—get whatever you can—and go kill some niggers. Do it while you still can, White European man. Kill these subhuman chimps before they kill you, your family, and your entire continent.

Triweekly Antifeminist #fundie triweeklyantifeminist.wordpress.com

The esteemed commentator Chinzork wrote:

For one of the first posts on this blog, I think you should debunk all of the common talking points against abolishing the AOC. The talking points get repetitive after a while, so an article debunking all of them sounds good.

Alright then, you got it. Herein is a compilation of the 15 most popular Blue Knight arguments, each argument followed by a thorough dissection thereof.

#1: Teenagers only become sexually mature after completing puberty around 16.

This is a wholly metaphysical proposition; a statement of belief. The Blue Knight starts out from the premise that a “completion of puberty” is a prerequisite for this nebulous state known as “sexual maturity,” then makes the circular argument that, because a 13-year-old has not yet completed puberty, he or she are thus sexually immature. “Sexual maturity” is an altogether arbitrary concept, and there isn’t any way to measure it or test it.

The Blue Knight makes it seem like he or she has objectively examined the issue and reached the conclusion that the age of “sexual maturity” just so happens to start when puberty is over; but there has not actually been any such objective examination of the issue – it simply has been assumed (axiomatically) that this is the case, and the whole “argument” proceeds from this unproven, arbitrary, and essentially metaphysical assumption.

The Blue Knight argument posits that 1) without “sexual maturity” sex is harmful and as such should be illegal; 2) a full completion of puberty is a prerequisite for “sexual maturity.” You may well give the following counter-argument, accepting — for the sake of discussion — the former premise, while rejecting the latter, and say thus: “children become sexually mature after completing adrenarche around the age of 9.”

Fundamentally, however, I have seen no evidence whatsoever that a “sexually immature” person is necessarily harmed (or victimized) by sexual relations merely due to being, according to whatever arbitrary definitions one uses, a “sexually immature” person. I suspect that, as a matter of fact, “sexually immature” people often enjoy sex and benefit from it even more than the so-called “sexually mature” folks. And again, the very distinction between “mature” and “immature” is altogether metaphysical in this regard, like the distinction between “pure” and “impure” or “holy” and “unholy.” It is hocus pocus; theology not-so-cleverly disguised as biology.

According to Blue Knight “morality,” an extremely fertile 15-year-old female should be prevented from sex (because “sexually immature”), while a 55-year-old female who has no ovaries left should be free do get fucked however she likes. It is very clear that such a “morality” is really an anti-morality; it is against what is biologically natural, it is against human nature specifically, it is degenerate, and it is detrimental to the interests of civilization and the TFR.

#2: The Age of Consent protects young people from doing things (sex) which they don’t really want to do.

I have seen no evidence that young people “do not really want” to have sex. On the contrary, I have seen, and keep seeing, that young people greatly desire to engage in sexual activities. That is why they engage in them. If 11-year-old Lucy is a horny little slut who enjoys giving blowjobs to all the boys in the neighborhood (many such cases), the Age of Consent does not protect her from something which she is reluctant about doing; it prevents her — by deterring men from approaching her — from doing something which she does in fact desire to do.

The Age of Consent is simply not needed. Think for a moment about young people. Do you not realize that they are just as eccentric, and can be just as wild, as older people? Why is it that when a 19-year-old chick randomly decides to have an orgy with 3 classmates after school, that is okay; but when a 12-year-old chick likewise randomly decides to do just that, oh noes, she is a “victim” of a horrible crime? We accept that each person is unique, independently of age; and we realize that there are children –not to mention young adults — who are very much into X while others are very much into Y. Why, then, should it be so “shocking” when it turns out that some children, and plenty of young teenagers, are very much into sex? Being interested in sex is arguably one of the most natural things there are, on par with being interested in food; certainly it is more natural than being interested in physics and chemistry and mathematics, right? If we accept the existence of child prodigies, children who are naturally driven to pursue all kinds of weird and special callings, why can’t we accept that there are indeed lots of children who pursue the very natural thing which is called “sex”?

Young teenagers have extremely high sex-drives, and the idea that they “do not really want sex” is contradicted every single moment. This is all the more remarkable given that we are living in a puritanical, prudish, sex-hostile, joy-killing, pedo-hysterical, infantilizing society; yet teenagers manage to overcome this intense anti-natural social programming, and do what nature commands them to do. “Child innocence” is a self-perpetuating myth, which society shoves down the throats of everyone all the time since age 0, and then uses this self-perpetuating myth which has been forcefully injected into society’s bloodstream to argue that “oh gee, young people just don’t really want to have sex.”

The entire entertainment establishment is concomitantly brainwashing children to remain in a state of arrested development aka infantilization, while conditioning the consumers of this “entertainment” to only find old women attractive. That’s one reason why I believe that we must create Male Sexualist aesthetics – we must reverse the brainwashing done to us by the entertainment complex. The television box is deliberately hiding from you the beauty and the passion of young teenage women, and is actively engineering your mind to only find older women attractive. And yet, despite there being a conspiracy by the entire society to stifle young sexuality, young sexuality lives on and thrives. Well, not really “thrives” — young sex is in decline, which conservative total dipshits blame on pornography rather than pointing the finger at themselves for propagating a climate that is extremely hostile to young sexuality — but it still goes on, to the consternation of all Puritans and Feminists everywhere.

Blue Knights claim that young teenagers are “peer-pressured into sex.” This assumes that your average teenager is asexual or close to being asexual, and thus would only engage in sexual activities if manipulated into it by his or her environment. The reality, meanwhile, is that those 12-year-old sluts who have orgies after school time (or during school time) are often as horny as a 16-year-old male. They are not being pressured into sex – they are being sexually restrained by a society that is terrified of young sexuality.

#3: Young people who have sex grow up to regret it.

First of all, when the whole of society is determined to portray young sex as a horrid thing, it is no wonder that people — especially women, who possess a herd mentality — arrive at the conclusion that they’ve been harmed by it. If young sexuality were presented in a positive light by the media-entertainment-state bureaucracy-academia complex, people would be more inclined to remember it fondly than regretfully.

The second thing is that it doesn’t even matter. People feel regret about doing all kinds of things – so what? Does that mean that for each and every case of such “regret,” society needs to go on a witch-hunt for “victimizers” in order to inflict punishments upon them? It’s time to grow the fuck up and accept the fact that people sometimes do things which later on they regret doing, and that this is an integral part of life, and that the state has no business protecting the civilians from “bad feelings.” That’s literally what this Blue Knight argument boils down to – “the state should punish men because women experience negative feelings due to their own behavior.” No, women should learn to deal with their bad fee-fees without demanding the state to find “abusers” to penalize. We are living in a totalitarian emotocracy (rule by emotions) and I’m sick of it.

Also: what is the difference between feeling regret about fucking at 13 and feeling regret about fucking at 17? Women generally feel bad about promiscuous sex (hence the phenomenon of “regret rape” false accusations), and they feel it at the age of 21 as much as at the age of 11; actually, older women may be even more regretful than young ones about sexual activity, because they’v been longer exposed to Puritan-Feminist brainwashing, and because their biological clock ticks much faster. So, according to the victimization-based morality of Blue Knights, men who sleep with 23-year-olds should also be punished. Again, the Blue Knights want men imprisoned solely due to some vague negative fee-fees felt by some women. This is emotocracy in action. No wonder that testosterone and sperm counts are in sharp decline – society is ruled by catladies, and is structured according to catlady morality.

The state simply should not protect people from the consequences of their own behavior – and here “protect” means “punish men,” and “consequences” means “vague negative fee-fees.” Our society is severely infantilized by the victimization-based morality, and infantilization is degenerate.

#4: Young sexual activity is correlated with many bad things.

That may or may not be so, but what are the implications? Generally, people who are natural risk-takers will do all kinds of things, some of which may be positive, others negative, and still others just neutral. The conservadaddy making the “correlated with bad things” argument implies that punishing men (and women) for young sex would somehow reduce those negative things supposedly correlated with young sex. That, of course, is bullshit. If a risk-taking 12-year-old decides to have an orgy with her classmates, she will remain just as much of a risk-taker whether or not her classmates or other people are punished. Depriving her of the opportunity to take “sexual risks” won’t diminish whatever other risk-taking behaviors she is prone to.

The thing about Blue Knight arguments is that they aren’t arguments at all. There is no logic in stating “young sex is correlated with X, and X is bad” and then using that to support the criminalization of young sex. This is the same logic used by pedagogues to justify pedagoguery, only in reverse: the pedagogues argue that education is correlated with intelligence (as measured by IQ tests), then use that claim to imply that education makes people smarter, and therefore everyone should undergo education. This is a wholly fallacious argument. At the risk of sounding like a spergtastic redditor goon – correlation does not imply causation. The Blue Knight argument is not an argument at all. It’s plainly illogical.

By the way, I’d say that there are plenty of negative things correlated with young sexlessness – such as growing up to be a school shooter, for instance. You’ll never hear Blue Knights discussing that.

#5: Some Statutory Rape legislation allows teenagers to have sex among themselves, and only prohibits older people from predating upon them.

This argument typifies what I call the “victimization-based morality” aka “victimology.” The people making it assume — against all the available evidence — that within any relationship between a young person and an old person, the former is necessarily victimized by the latter.

The individuals making this argument (usually you’ll hear it from women) will often tell you that it is “creepy” for older men to be interested in young women. They will pretend that young women are exclusively attracted to young men, when in reality they are attracted to men of all ages – to men as old as their father as well as to their classmates. My own life experience confirms this, as I personally, in-real-life, know of women who fucked significantly older men when they were aged 14-15. It was all passionate and voluntary and enthusiastic, believe me. And the many accounts you can find on the internet leave no doubt that it’s common for young women, pubescent and even prepubescent, to be sexually attracted to significantly older men.

It is important to stress the point that the women themselves pursue and desire those sexual relationships, because the Blue Knights have created the false impression that the entire argument for abolishing the AOC rests on our attraction to young women, an attraction which according to the Blue Knights is completely unreciprocated; whereas in reality, it is incredibly common for young women to initiate sexual relationships with men as old as their father. It takes two to tango – and the tango is quite lively indeed. Given the sexual dynamics elucidated by Heartiste, wherein women are sexually attracted to “Alphas,” it makes perfect sense that young women would be sexually attracted to older men even more-so than they are sexually attracted to their peers, since older men possess a higher social status than young ones, relatively speaking. Again, life experience confirms this.

Thus, there is no sense in punishing old men who fuck young women, unless, that is, one embraces the whole “taken advantage of” argument, an argument which relies on a denial of the biological and empirical reality on the ground, and simply defines (as an axiom) all relationships in which there is a “power imbalance” as “exploitative.” That is, there is no evidence that any “exploitation” is taking place in such relationships, and Blue Knights assume its existence because they refuse to believe that young women can be horny for older men.

Also, the Blue Knights will bring up argument #1 to “substantiate” argument #5, and argue that due to the “sexual immaturity” of the younger party, the older party must be forbidden from being in a sexual relationship with it altogether – because otherwise there may be “exploitation.” Again, the moment you realize that a 12-year-old female can be as horny as a 16-year-old male (who are, needless to say, extremely horny), the idea that the slut is prone to be “sexually exploited” by a sexual relationship with a man who is statistically likely to be high-status (and thus naturally sexually attractive to her) become absurd. And as we’ve seen, the whole “sexually immature” line is ridiculous – it has never been shown that maturity, for whatever it’s even worth, is reached at 16. In saner, de-infantilized times, 12-year-olds were considered to be mature, were treated as such, and evidently were mature. Hence my saying: “child (and teen) innocence is a self-perpetuating myth.”

#6: You only support abolishing the AOC because you’re a pervert.

A common ad hominem. Now, it is expected that possession of a naturally high sex-drive would be correlated with sexual realism (i.e. being woke about the reality of sex), because a high sex-drive individual would be much likelier than a low sex-drive individual to spend hours upon hours thinking about the subject of sex in its various and manifold aspects. But that only goes to prove that it is us, the “perverts,” who were right all along about sex – and not the catladies and the asexuals who haven’t ever thought about sex in realistic terms because they never had any incentive to do so. Our “bias” is a strength, not a weakness.

There really isn’t anything else to add here. When they accuse you of being a pervert, just agree & amplify humorously: “oh yeah, I jerk off 8 times each and every morning before getting out of bed – problem, puritan?”

#7: You only support abolishing the AOC because you are unattractive and trying to broaden your options.

Also known as “projection.” Well, actually, there also are men who make this argument and not just dried-out wrinkly femihags, so let’s address it as if a man said it. Again, this is an ad hominem that presupposes that your motivation to engage in sexual politics of the Male Sexualist variety is merely your desire to improve your personal situation in life. Now, even if it were true, that 1) wouldn’t matter, because what matters is the arguments made and not the ostensible motivation behind them; 2) there is nothing essentially wrong with trying to improve one’s situation in life – and “there are no rules in war and love.”

By the way, abolishing the AOC, by itself, is not going to get all of the incels laid over-night. There are other measures that must and will be taken to ensure sexual contentment for all of society. Abolishing the AOC is a crucial part of the program, but it’s not the single purpose of Male Sexualism, in my view. What I personally would like to see in society is maximal sexual satisfaction for everyone. There are many ways to try reaching that point.

Anyway, the point is that “you are motivated by a desire to increase your options” is not even true regarding most of the prominent Male Sexualists. Presumably. I won’t speak for anyone else, but I’m married, and very satisfied with my great wife.

14376_7
Big Beautiful Women are not for everyone, but I’m cool with it. In this scene from the Israeli film “Tikkun,” my wife — who is an actress — plays a prostitute. Sorry, Nathan Larson, I’m not sending you her nudes; this one should suffice.
As a matter of fact, as I wrote in one of the last posts on DAF, my own kind of activism would not be mentally possible for me if I were not sexually satisfied. I’m not driven by a personal sexual frustration; on the contrary, as I keep saying, what drives me is essentially a spiritual impulse, which has awoken to the extent it has as a result of getting laid.

#8: If you support the abolition of the AOC, it’s because you’re a libertine who believes in “everything goes.”

Some Male Sexualists are, unmistakably, libertines – and proud if it. However, others are faithful Muslims. The notion that opposition to the AOC must necessarily be tied to libertinism is nonsense. Look at traditional European societies 350-300 years ago – almost none had an AOC at all, yet they were hardly “libertines.”

This Blue Knight line is somewhat related to the “LGBTP” meme – they think that we are Progressives trying to advocate for pedophilia as part of a Progressive worldview. I think that it’s safe to say that no one in Male Sexualism belongs to the Progressive camp, which is the camp where Feminists and SJWs reside. That said, some versions of libertinism (sexual libertarianism?) aren’t so bad, anyway. As TheAntifeminist said in a comment at Holocaust21:

[M]y utopia as a male sexualist would be somewhere like 1970’s Sweden or Holland.

This is a legitimate view within the movement.

#9: If young people are allowed to have sex, their innocence will be ruined; sex is exclusively for adults.

Here we see the Enlightenment-spawned Romantic idealization of “childhood” as a period that, due to whatever values one attaches to it, must be preserved against encroachment and incursion from the “fallen world of adults.” This is the Romantic basis of modern-day infantilism.

It used to be understood that the purpose of “childhood” is growing up into adulthood. The so-callef ‘child’ should be made into an adult, should be given adult tasks, adult responsibilities, and — all the sooner — adult rights. Today, society does just the opposite, and infantilizes people with a historically unparalleled intensity. That’s the result of elevating “childhood” into an ideal form. No wonder that now, it’s not just teenagers who are called “children,” but people in their 20s. That’s the process of infantilization which society goes through.

As usual, conservative dipshits, addicted to their own Romantic conceptions, claim that “actually, children are not nearly infantile enough these days.” They don’t see the pervasive “kid culture” that has completely zombified kids into being basically a bunch of drooling retards; no, what the prudish-types care about is “MOAR INNOCENCE,” as usual.

Fact is, kids today are not shown anything about the real world; a whole culture of idiocy, blindness, silliness, and clownishness has been erected like walls all around them. It is the culture of the TV channels for kids, the culture of Toy-Shops, the culture of child-oriented video games. Muh “birds and bees.”

Look, I get the temptation to indulge in infantilism. In fact, I’m probably a hypocrite, because I haven’t yet begun doing anything to de-infantilize my own 19-month-old son. He, like most toddlers, also watches the stupid TV shows and has all of these damn toys all over the place. It’s not easy resisting the ways of the system. But the real problem is that society is not structured in a way that allows children to be de-infantilized. When people only get a job at 18 or at 21 or they are NEETs, and there is an age-ist Prussian School System that is mandatory and which brainwashes its prisoners to believe that “school is good,” and Feminist careerism is pushed on all potential mothers by the media-entertainment-state bureaucracy-academia complex, it’s no wonder that people are very immature nowadays. That only goes to show how radically modern society must be transformed, in my opinion.

To get back on point: “childhood” and “adulthood” are both fictional concepts. These may be useful fictions, but they are still fictions. The telos of childhood is adulthood. It’s a transitional state, and if we must choose an arbitrary age when childhood should be officially and finally over, that age should be 9. That is, if we discover that 10-year-olds behave in an infantile manner nowadays, it’s because their parents — and, crucially, society at large — have not properly de-infantilized them. It’s a wholly artificial state of affairs, rooted in Romantic delusions.

Young people should have sex, because young people should experience real life in order to become functional adults; and an integral part of real life is — and should be — the sex life. Far from constituting a “problem” for young people, sexual intercourse is one effective way for getting young people to see the broader picture of reality. Deprived of sex, ‘kids’ grow up with warped and unrealistic notions about reality, and suffer dysfunction as adults. They don’t get to learn what’s important and what’s unimportant in life when they should learn it – young. Getting laid gives you a mentally clear vision of priorities in life, gives you a clarity of mind which allows you to deeply reflect on what’s actually going on in the world. Sex is necessary for young people, whose one and only task is to — repeat after me — become adults. Sex is a fundamental part of a fulfilled adult life.

#10: Young sex leaves young people traumatized.

No, it doesn’t. The ‘trauma’ stems entirely from being repeatedly and incessantly told by Blue Knights (Puritans, Feminists, Conservadaddies, Catladies, etc.) that a horrible crime has been committed against you by a wicked individual, that you have been “taken advantage of,” “deprived of innocence,” “ruined forever,” “sexually exploited,” “abused,” and the rest of the victimological jargon. The sex itself and the relationship itself feel good, and are indeed good biologically and psychologically; they bring fulfillment to one’s life and a satisfaction for one’s fresh and burning biological needs. The whole “trauma,” such as it is, is inflicted by society on the younger party, due to society’s strict adherence to a victimization-based morality.

That’s why I call for a Moral Revolution. This is not a troll. As long as people adhere to a victimization-based morality that sees “power imbalances” as inherently and fundamentally victimizing, people won’t be able to think logically about young sexuality. The current prevailing system of social morality must be replaced with a new one. Once that is achieved, all of this “trauma” — which is inflicted by the Blue Knights on horny young people — will dissipate and evaporate altogether

Young people greatly enjoy sex, and will go to great lengths to achieve it, overcoming the very many mechanisms of sexual oppression established by Blue Knights.

#11: Young people don’t know what’s good for them, and therefore need to be protected from risky situations.

If young people don’t know what’s good for them, it’s because society itself has successfully destroyed their ability to know what’s good for them. I mean, by the age of 10, a person should have a basic idea about what life is all about. If that’s not so for most or all people, something is deeply rotten in society.

And the reason for this indeed being the modern state of affairs is exactly because the protectiveness of parents, combined with wholesale cultural infantilization, has rendered young people incapable of independent thought. Thus, instead of “MOAR PROTECTION,” young people need infinitely less of it – so that they will learn to deal with reality.

And at any rate, sex is not as risky as the Blue Knights claim it is. They scare people about STDs, but then the solutions to that problem are well-known, and are completely independent of age – if instructed properly, and possessing a responsible personality, a 10-year-old can behave just as carefully — if not much more carefully — than many 40-year-olds.

Then there is the issue of pregnancy. First of all, what I wrote in the above paragraph about responsiblity applies here as well – the pregnancy-avoidance methods are well known. Secondly however, there’s a great differences in here: pregnancy is not a disease. It’s not a bad thing, but a good thing. I support young pregnancy and young parenthood. That is the primary “risk” which Blue Knight scare-mongers warn about, and I don’t see it as a risk at all. Instead of being protected from reproduction, people need to be instructed about how to reproduce. I once wrote, trollishly as usual, that if there should be any schools at all, then the “homework” of young females should be getting impregnated. The essence beneath the statement is on-point: pregnancy is good, because reproduction is good; fertility is good, while sterility is bad.

So, in my view, young people should not be protected from the “risk” of pregnancy. They should be instructed about it, made to comprehend the how’s and why’s of it, and then allowed to use their mind-faculties to figure-out what should or should not be done. That’s the gist of any de-infantilization program.

#12: Young people don’t desire to have sex.

Young people do, as a matter of actual fact, very much desire to have sex; much more-so, even, than many old people.

#13: If the AOC is abolished, parents will no longer be able to control their children.

What is the purpose — the very raison d’etre — of parental control over children? To turn children into functional adults, so as to allow them to form families and continue the bloodline. This cannot be achieved by hindering the ability of children (or “children”) to engage in the one thing that marks the arrival of maturity – sexual activity. Sexual activity is the thing that most unequivocally transforms an un-developed person into a developed person. Since the purpose of parenthood is the creation of adults, parenthood should serve to (at the very least) give-way in face of the natural maturation of children, rather than artificially prolonging “childhood” in order to extend the period of parental control. Parental control is only good insofar as it allows parents to facilitate the de-infantilization of their children; when, as in our deplorable times, parental control is used to exacerbate the infantilization of children, it is in the interest of society to tell parents to fuck off.

Since parents these days abuse their parental power and authority by artificially prolonging the infantilization of their own children, the abolition of the anti-natural AOC is exactly a thing that is needed in order to put parental control in check. The power of parents vis-a-vis their children must be drastically reduced when the child reaches the age of 8. That’s usually the age when sex, reproduction, and marriage all become relevant. If you want to argue that 8 is still too young, perhaps (maybe) we can compromise on 10. Point is, between 8 and 10, parental power should be dramatically restricted.

As a 23-year-old father, I can tell you that parents and family in general continue to significantly shape your life long after you cease being under “parental control.” An abolition of the AOC won’t result in all teenagers running away from home never to be seen again. But it will, God willing, result in the establishment of many new young households. That is something that we should strive for – getting teenagers to form families. That is the meaning of creating adults.

#14: Without an AOC, there will be grey-zone situations of child prostitution.

Child prostitution should be legal.

#15: Abolishing the AOC will increase pre-marital sex, which is a bad thing.

First of all, I couldn’t care less about whether or not sex is “pre-marital.” I had fucked my wife and impregnated her before we were married; so what? What matters is the bottom line: the creation of a patriarchal and stable household.

The second thing is, people today marry extremely late, and many forgo marriage altogether. This is related to the war against young sexuality: not reproducing when young, people struggle to reproduce when old; and living in sexlessness until the late teens or early twenies (or until later than that), a total sexual dysfunction takes over society, and people find it difficult to form long-lasting relationships at all. Young love shines the brightest, the younger the love, the brighter it shines; couples who start young last longer than those who start old.

Puritanical Blue Knights have brought about the plummeting of the TFR in Western Society. In my view, pre-marital sex should be accepted, as long as everyone involved understands that the purpose of any “romance” is the formation of a household. Early teenage marriage should be encouraged, and if early teenage sexual intercourse facilitates that, so be it – it’s all the better. It is not sex that is harmful to young people; sex is good for them. It is sexlessness that is the central and overarching problem of our times.

In conclusion
Man, that was exhausting, I gotta say. But hopefully, this post will serve as a guide to answering Blue Knight talking points. All of you must remember this: before you can annihilate Blue Knightism, you must mentally internalize what it is that we Male Sexualists believe in. In moments of uncertainty and doubt, consult this post, and you may find the core idea needed for you in order to formulate your own Male Sexualist position about any given issue.

There is a new revolution on the horizon. I don’t know how long I personally have left in this world. Perhaps the intelligence operatives threatening me will decide against killing me, or maybe they’ll slay me this very night. Who knows. What I want you to do is to take the ideas provided on DAF and now on TAF, understand them, and spread them. This is not a cult of personality or a money-making scheme. This is a political movement that has its own ideas, ideas that may initially appear groundbreaking but which in reality may also be primordial, ideas which we hope will be implemented in reality – be it 30, 80, or 360 years from now. At some point in the future, somewhere on the face of our planet, there will be a Male Sexualist country.

If during the next half-decade we manage to bring into the fold both edgy 4channers and 8channers (“meme lords”), and serious, intelligent, competent, affluent, deep-thinking, and strategizing supporters, we will be able within several decades to achieve our political objective.