Similar posts

NO MORE FACTORIES EVER #conspiracy godlikeproductions.com

CoronaVirus 100% MOTIVE = RAPID DE-INDUSTRIALIZATION: Potato Chips Donuts Cookies Recreational Drinks ALL DEEMED NON-ESSENTIAL

Coronavirus motives now showing in MSM reports

There are several British papers that are giving up the game on Coronavirus (or at least part of it). Their reports are stating that people are now being fined for buying non-essential items. What have they defined non-essential to now?

Potato chips, donuts, cookies, and recreational drinks (so far) and if the list includes that, it will also obviously eventually include other things you "don't really need" such as musical instruments, entertainment systems, cars, spices and anything else you would not actually physically die without. You can forget buying roller skates, baseball bats, football cleats and whatever else also.

It was said EARLY ON in this "coronavirus crisis" that "people would have to learn to live with less" but they never said why. It is becoming obvious WHY - they are going to shut down a LOT of factories and they will never be re-opened and I would not doubt the prospect of goons going around and stripping everyone of everything they don't absolutely need - that they already had before this.

De-industrialization and an extreme downgrade in standard of living is going to be a major goal here, "you don't need a 3 bedroom home, you really can live in a 100 square foot room with a squat toilet and stove".

David Barton #fundie rightwingwatch.org

Religious Right pseudo-historian David Barton delivered a presentation to a Tea Party group in Virginia over the weekend, where he stated that New York Governor Andrew Cuomo’s executive orders banning non-essential state travel to North Carolina and Mississippi are violations of the laws of nature.

Barton was making his standard argument that natural law was incorporated into the Constitution and so things like abortion and homosexuality can never be legalized when he took issue with Gov. Cuomo’s orders, which were responses to the passage of anti-LGBTQ laws in North Carolina and Mississippi.

As Barton explained it, barring non-essential state travel to those two states is a violation of the natural right to expatriation.

“Expatriation … is the right to move freely among herds,” Barton said. “If I’m with an elk herd and I’m tired of this group, then I’ll go over to that group and I’ll change and I have the right to move among herds and that’s why Article II in the Constitution gives us the right to move freely between the states.”

Cuomo’s executive orders, Barton said, “violate the rights of expatriation” because “I’ve got the right to move freely among all the states.”

“We’ve got a governor who says, ‘I don’t like what they’re doing, so you can’t go to those states’,” Barton said. “No, you can’t do that. That’s the right of expatriation.”

Barton’s argument is obviously nonsense, since the executive orders do not prohibit anyone from traveling anywhere they like, but rather simply ban non-essential “publicly funded or publicly sponsored travel” to these two states. In fact, by Barton’s logic, any employer not allowing any employee to use company funds to travel anywhere they want for any reason would be a violation the natural right to expatriation.

Washington Watcher II #racist #wingnut vdare.com

Thanks to the Chinese Virus, you can be arrested for leaving your home or traveling for “non-essential purposes.” Failure to “social distance” can mean jail-time as well. Yet the same politicians and judges who propose and enforce such measures have freed thousands of criminals from jails in case they contract the deadly Asian pathogen. The Anarcho-Tyranny so brilliantly described by the late Sam Francis is here.

President Trump’s job? Resist with everything he has.

Unsurprisingly, the Kritarchs are using the pandemic to bend the law. Last week, Obama-appointed Judge James E. Boasberg of U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., ordered Immigration and Customs Enforcement to prove that conditions in three family detention centers were sanitary. Failing that, he will free 1,350 illegals [U.S. judge widens order, urging ICE to release migrant families with young children in coronavirus outbreak, by Spencer Hsu, The Washington Post, March 30, 2020]. Boasberg’s move fortifies an order from benchmate Dolly Gee, a notorious Kritarch who routinely sides with illegals. She made detained minors eligible for release.

Judge William Young, of the U.S. District Court in Massachusetts, ordered three illegals released from the Bristol County Court House because they have no prior arrest records. And he wants to review 50 more cases [Judge starts releasing ICE detainees during coronavirus spread concerns, by Sarah Betancourt, Commonwealth, April 3, 2020].

Reinforcing the Kritarchy is its lawfare auxiliary. The $PLC and ACLU filed a joint lawsuit to demand the release of all illegal aliens in southern facilities if they are deemed “no threat” to the public. Those border jumpers are so-called asylum seekers, the lawsuit claims, who “risked their lives to escape persecution and torture in their home countries” [Civil Rights Groups Sue ICE to Force Release of Detainees Vulnerable to COVID-19, by Noah Lanard, Mother Jones, March 31, 2020]. More than 3,000 left-wing physicians demand the release of all detainees, and immigration judges and lawyers want immigration courts closed [Growing Calls To Close Immigration Courts And Release Detainees As Virus Spreads, by Joel Rose, NPR, March 21, 2020].

Unsurprisingly, 15 Democrat congressmen, including Minnesota’s Ilhan Omar—the beturbaned Somali refugee brought to the country on the taxpayers' dime—have demanded that the Department of Homeland Security halt deportations, release “vulnerable” detainees, and shut down immigration courts [Rep. Ilhan Omar: ICE Must Stop Spreading Coronavirus, by Ryan Devereaux, The Intercept, March 20, 2020].

The detainees, of course, are helping push the Open-Borders agenda. Personnel in multiple facilities have needed force to quell demonstrations, which the MSM and Democrats call “peaceful protests” [Immigrants Afraid Of The Coronavirus Outbreak Are Protesting Inside ICE Facilities, by Hamed Aleaziz, Buzzfeed, March 26, 2020].

Then again, some detainees, fearing infection, want immediate deportation: “They don’t want to continue fighting,” one detainee told The Guardian [‘We’re gonna die’: migrants in US jail beg for deportation due to Covid-19 exposure, by Sam Levin, April 4, 2020]. That’s right! It makes little sense to keep the illegals here, where contracting the infection is more likely than in Guatemala, Honduras, or El Salvador.

All this proves one thing: no matter how grave the crisis, the Left will push for Open Borders. Don’t forget that Democrat presidential candidates Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders, along with their allied Leftist media mob, called Trump a xenophobe for closing the borders to China back on January 31 [After attacking Trump's coronavirus-related China travel ban as xenophobic, Dems and media have changed tune, by Greg Re, Fox News, April 2, 2020].

Yet turning illegals loose is only one weapon in the arsenal of Anarcho-Tyranny.

Expanding soft-on-crime policies, authorities in Michigan, California, New York, and New Jersey have released convicted criminals from jail. Many are unhealthy or close to their release dates [Nowhere to go: Some inmates freed because of coronavirus are 'scared to leave', by Kara Scannell, CNN, April 4, 2020] And Attorney General Bill Barr has ordered federal prisons to speed up early release for vulnerable detainees [Barr expands early release for inmates at prisons hard hit by coronavirus, by David Shortell, CNN, April 4, 2020].

But those seemingly humane policies don’t go far enough for the Anarcho-Tyrants.

Several district attorneys and police commissioners now won’t arrest thugs for “non-violent” offenses, while cops in Philadelphia are releasing suspects collared for theft, burglary, narcotics, prostitution, and other “low-level” crimes [Philly Coronavirus News: Confusion Over Arrests, Confusion Over “Essential” Businesses, by Victor Fiorillo, Philadelphia, March 18, 2020].

However, “progressive” prosecutors and police chiefs want to make those changes permanent. “We put far too many people behind bars for far too long,” read one letter signed by 30 Leftist district attorneys [The Coronavirus and Anarcho-Tyranny, by Robert Hampton, American Renaissance, March 25, 2020].

That’s the anarchy. Here’s the tyranny:

New York police arrested three people last week for ignoring or forgetting “social-distancing” guidelines. One woman spent 36 hours in a crowded holding cell, and so her employer forbade her return to work because she might have been exposed [NYPD’s Aggressive Policing Risks Spreading The Coronavirus, by Alice Speri, The Intercept, April 3, 2020]. Rhode Island authorities are searching door-to-door for Empire Staters to quarantine them or, amusingly, deport them back home [Rhode Island begins door to door checks for New Yorkers fleeing coronavirus, The Associated Press, March 29, 2020].

Most cities and states have ordered residents to stay home unless traveling to work or the grocery. Violators face stiff penalties. In Maryland, you might pay a $5,000 fine and spend a year in the slammer [Governor Hogan Issues Stay-At-Home Order For Maryland, WAMU, March 30, 2020]. As well, “non-essential” businesses and services, including churches, are shuttered. Last week, cops arrested a Florida pastor for holding a church service [Florida pastor says he got death threats after being charged with violating coronavirus order, by David K. Li, NBC News, April 2, 2020].

The Chinese Virus is also helping the gun grabbers: Gun stores in some cities are judged “non-essential,” which means law-abiding residents can’t buy the means to defend themselves against the very thugs the authorities released from jail [Cities close 'nonessential' gun shops despite increased new weapons purchases amidst coronavirus pandemic, by Alexandra Kelley, The Hill, March 27, 2020]!

This is the face of Anarcho-Tyranny: Free the illegals and criminals; control and arrest the law-abiding.

Most Americans are freely cooperating with basic safety precautions. But the Left is using that good will, good sense, and respect for the law to expand state power and insidiously erode our basic civil liberties.

That’s why Trump mustn’t cave. Illegals should either be detained or deported—particularly given the success of his immediate deportation order for those caught jumping the border. Criminals must be kept in jail … where they belong. The crimes they’ll commit regardless, if the Chinese Virus is spreading to jails, that’s where possibly-infected inmates must stay.

Fighting this insanity might ultimately require Trump to ignore the judges to deport illegals. And he might have to use federal law to stop the arrest of the law-abiding for petty violations of Chinese Virus orders.

The president did right when he stopped travel from China and cracked down on the border.

Now, he must do right again, and stop the Anarcho-Tyrants.

Covid Joker #conspiracy godlikeproductions.com

PAY ATTENTION... the TRAP is SET... this is the BAIT.

As I relax at home typing this, Hundreds of Millions of people around the globe, who work for businesses deemed 'non essential'...

...are also relaxing at home enjoying a paid holiday, in what is basically 'a taste' of Universal Basic Income...

So... how does that UBI bait taste?

It taste good don't it?

I mean let's be honest, most work does suck, and I reckon we could get used to this.

But, something does seem a little bit off doesn't it?

CORRECT.

The saying 'no such thing as a free lunch' is as true as ever, and I believe the Global Elite are giving us a taste of their UBI bait, in order to SEDUCE us in PHASE ONE of their trap, which is to have every human on the planet digitally marked for tracking using 5G and Artificial Intelligence.

This 'Digital Mark' will be linked to your unique ID2020 number and your vaccine records, and will enable you to receive Universal Basic Income EVEN if you are deemed a 'non essential worker'...

...in other words pretty much EXACTLY what many are experiencing right now, which is getting paid to stay at home because they are deemed 'non-essential'.

So... PHASE 1 of the TRAP (the phase we are currently in) is to get 'non essential workers' used to free money (UBI), in order to seduce them into receiving the Digital Mark tied to Vaccine Records, and of course to get 'Essential workers' to also take the mark, in order to keep their jobs.

When you think about it their PHASE 1 trap is genius...

...if you as a 'non essential worker' want to continue your paid holiday... then take the vaccine and digital mark, otherwise continue, but on permanent unpaid leave.

THEN COMES PHASE 2...

Phase 2 is when Bill Gates's TRUE agenda is revealed...

...you see Bill is a huge proponent for Universal Basic Income... but it comes with a caveat... he believes and has expressed on several occasions that the UBI must be EARNED...

In other words, 'useless eaters' or those in society who are not considered 'essential workers' in their New World Order permanent Lock Down WILL be CUT OFF completely from the Universal Basic Income, and left to STARVE.

As inhumane as that sounds (and definitely is), the harsh reality is that throughout history death by STARVATION has been a favorite depopulation method embraced by Communist Dictators, and this One World Government Dictatorship will be no exception.

You have been warned.

WorldGoneCrazy #fundie disqus.com

(comparing abortion to whipping slaves and Jew gassing)

You really do not get it.

All human rights atrocities differ on the non-essentials and have agreement on the essentials.

The fact that they are not identical is no warrant against the fact that they have commonality.

If this were not true, then we could NEVER learn from past mistakes.

But, you reminded me of one more similarity: slaves were considered to be human property and the preborn child is considered to be human property - to be killed or disposed of by choice.

Thanks!

Linda Harvey #fundie #homophobia #transphobia #wingnut missionamerica.com

We’re all figuring out the new normal, yet it’s important to be on guard as the usual suspects try to rip off America while we aren’t looking.

For instance, Samaritan’s Purse is subjected to petty protests from the left about possible “LGBTQ” exclusion from their field hospitals built to take care of virus patients—of any preference or persuasion—in New York City’s Central Park.

So what contributions are America’s homosexual activists making out of the goodness of their hearts? Sacrificing time, talent and treasure to lend a hand to any suffering American, even a Christian, who shows up at their vast array of volunteer clinics?

In a word, zip. Instead, the self-interested Human Rights Campaign is morphing into the latest whining entitlement group. A recent e-blast lamented the marginalized “LGBTQ” community’s limited access to health insurance, the message being that it’s everyone else’s responsibility to provide for these self-disadvantaged perennial victims. Never mind their chosen high-risk lifestyles. The President must be pressured to reopen the wasteful ACA health exchange bureaucracies during the virus emergency.

Watch for the virus relief bills to cover “gay” entitlements as these radicals never let a crisis go to waste, and also, seldom think about anyone but themselves.

While the virus shutdown settles in for a few weeks, parents must diligently protect children now at home for seven additional hours each weekday. Guarding them from cyber danger is essential.

The good news is that drag queens are shut out of libraries for now. The bad news is that some are offering online “entertainment” for kids where perversion is pitched as a light-hearted joke and “LGBTQ” deviance mainstreamed as a normal option.

The Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN) will hold its annual pro-homosexual/pro-gender-confusion propaganda day, the “Day of Silence,” online for middle and high schoolers this year on April 24. This child corruption organization will also conduct virtual “gay straight alliances” (or “genders and sexualities alliances”) in what they believe is “support” for these terribly confused teens.

Be alert to any connection your middle or high schooler makes on the Internet or in social media to GLSEN or its affiliated activists. They fill young minds and hearts with immoral, ungodly misinformation, are openly hostile to Christian doctrine and seek to propel youth down heartbreaking, sinful roads.

The Human Rights Campaign is in the child endangerment business as well. Its gender confusion indoctrination program for grade schoolers called “Welcoming Schools” is holding a Wednesday online “inclusive” story session, featuring books normalizing gender switching, and families with two moms or two dads. Make sure your kids stay far away from this lollipop deviance.

There is some good news for parents grieving about a teen’s gender identity confusion. Surgeries to amputate healthy body parts (or construct false ones) are on hold for now, because they truly are “non-essential.” The bad news is that off-label prescriptions for puberty blockers and opposite sex hormones can continue.

T. Nguyen #fundie amazon.com


Of course I group TE into the category of non-essential, fuzzy type of class. I have no issue with TE as mutation but as macroevolution that it's often illustrated in books with morphing of cell to fish to mammal to man. To me at this point it's not proven until scientist can create a first living cell from chemicals and energy, and it's materially not useful, yet spiritually harmful. Scientific methods can be taught without TE. If some says creation shouldn't be taught in school then I'll suggest they don't tell fairy tales to their children, let them read Harry Potter, celebrate Christmas or Easter, or Halloween etc...anything that is not real or proven.

Truth first #fundie christiannews.net

Eldrida Urika:
"I always find it sad that grown adults can't get long with each other at all even just to work out the compromise .
Adults don't seem to have learned to share these day. They have little tolerance for other views and reject all suggestions of how to get along with small changes on each side."

Truth first:
You are totally correct in this if you apply it to the non-essentials of our lives, Eldrida. If we can find some common cause on topics that do not challenge the essence of the Bible, we must live in harmony with those people around us, and look for compromises if these can improve our relationships with them.
However, homosexuality goes to the core of who we are and how God created us. It is one of the non-negotiables of our faith and doctrine. As Christians we want to obey Jesus Christ who unequivocally rejects gay and lesbian lifestyles. We declare God to be inconsequential or, worse, to be a liar, if we even give the slightest kind of endorsement to homosexual unions. They can not be called marriages, as God made clear what he meant marriage to be. It is only when we redefine LOVE and redefine MARRIAGE in terminology that is unbiblical that we can endorse "same sex marriages". As Christian we HAVE TO warn the world about the sustained sinful state in which gays and lesbians live, and tell them that they forfeit afterlife with God if they sustain these relationships without repentance of it.

We can say all of this in a loving way, but cannot deviate from that message, even if it were to hurt the hearers.

Wayne Allyn Root #fundie rootforamerica.com

It’s only been 6 days and already my wish list is in place:

Trump used Executive orders to give the go-ahead to the long-stalled Keystone and Dakota Access Pipelines. America is open for business again (and high-paying middle class jobs).

Trump erased all mentions on the White House web site of “climate change.” He did that within ONE HOUR of taking the oath of office. Are you kidding me? It’s almost as if conservatives like me have died and gone to heaven. But wait, it gets better…

Trump erased all Spanish language from the White House web site. It is now “English Only.” It’s like Christmas in January.

Yesterday Trump issued an Executive order starting the construction of “THE WALL.” Liberals heads must be ready to explode.

He also announced the hiring of 10,000 new border agents.

He will soon announce a temporary ban on refugees from Syria and Middle Eastern war zones.

He also announced a ban on visas from dangerous Muslim-majority countries with inadequate screening.

He also announce the end of “Sanctuary cities” and the defunding of federal funds for any city that chooses to continue breaking the law.

He also signed an Executive order demanding the Secretary of Homeland Security publish a weekly list of violent crimes committed by illegal aliens.

Trump signed an Executive order freezing the hiring of non-essential federal employees. He is the first President EVER to figure out that government employees are busting the budget and bankrupting America with their obscene salaries and benefits, plus pensions that can best be described as insane. And there are far too many of them.

Trump issued an Executive order to “ease the burden of Obamacare” and as a bonus, made it clear to Congressional Republicans he wants Obamacare repealed and replaced FAST.

Trump said out loud the words “radical Islamic terrorism.” He did it in his inaugural speech- which means Trump did in his first 15 minutes as president what Obama would not do in eight years.

Trump has announced plans to dramatically lower taxes.

Trump has announced plans to cut 75% of regulations…and “maybe more.” SEVENTY FIVE PERCENT? Only a billionaire “CAN-DO” businessman aims for the moon. What a breath of fresh air.

Trump withdrew America from the TPP treaty that kills middle class American jobs. Even liberal unions applauded.

Trump announced he will renegotiate NAFTA in a matter of days.

The Trump State Department will begin an immediate review of Obama’s final hour giveaway of $220 million to the Palestinian Authority while Congress had a hold on the money.

The NY Times reports Trump is preparing Executive orders to drastically reduce funding and America’Donald Trump Is Already the Greatest Conservative President in Modern Historys involvement in the United Nations and international treaties. I’ve been waiting a lifetime for this one. It’s Christmas in January!

Trump announced he’ll begin a major investigation into voter fraud in the 2016 election. He believes millions of illegal aliens voted. It’s about time a Republican woke up- I believe he is right on the money.

So here’s my message to President Trump. Start your investigation in my home state of Nevada. I believe the so-called “Harry Reid Machine” used thousands of illegal alien voters to steal the state from Trump and the GOP. Make Nevada your “Exhibit A.”

And I’m counting on President Trump to pass National Voter ID laws so Democrats can never use voter fraud or illegal aliens to steal elections ever again.

By the way, Trump signed all these Executive orders with the bust of Winston Churchill behind him- back in the Oval Office for the first time in eight years. If image is important and symbolic, this says everything. Trump is erasing Obama as if he never existed.

Lastly, corporations across the globe have all publicly announced they are bringing jobs and billions of dollars of investment monies back to America because of President Trump- and many of those announcements came BEFORE Trump was even sworn in.

Simply amazing. Breathtaking. Head-spinning.

And all of this happened in Trump’s first 6 days. Even God rested on the 7th day. I’m betting Trump doesn’t.

Can you imagine what Trump will do starting in his second week?

There is no longer any doubt- Donald Trump is already the greatest conservative president in history.

Intothelight.news #conspiracy #crackpot intothelight.news

The National / Global Economic Security & Reformation Act

NESARA is the most ground breaking reformation to sweep not only the United States of America but the whole planet (thus GESARA) in its entire history. The act does away with the Federal Reserve Bank, the IRS, the shadow government, and much more.
NESARA implements the following changes:

Zeros out all credit card, mortgage, and other bank debt due to illegal banking and government activities. This is the Federal Reserve’s worst nightmare, a “jubilee” or a forgiveness of debt.
Abolishes the income tax.
Abolishes the IRS. Employees of the IRS will be transferred into the US Treasury national sales tax area.
Creates a 14% flat rate non-essential new items only sales tax revenue for the government. In other words, food and medicine will not be taxed; nor will used items such as old homes.
Increases benefits to senior citizens.
Returns Constitutional Law to all courts and legal matters.
Reinstates the original Title of Nobility amendment.
Establishes new Presidential and Congressional elections within 120 days after NESARA's announcement. The interim government will cancel all National Emergencies and return us back to constitutional law.
Monitors elections and prevents illegal election activities of special interest groups.
Creates a new U.S. Treasury rainbow currency backed by gold, silver, and platinum precious metals, ending the bankruptcy of the United States initiated by Franklin Roosevelt in 1933.
Forbids the sale of American birth certificate records as chattel property bonds by the US Department of Transportation.
Initiates new U.S. Treasury Bank System in alignment with Constitutional Law
Eliminates the Federal Reserve System. During the transition period the Federal Reserve will be allowed to operate side by side of the U.S. treasury for one year in order to remove all Federal Reserve notes from the money supply.
Restores financial privacy.
Retrains all judges and attorneys in Constitutional Law.
Ceases all aggressive, U.S. government military actions worldwide.
Establishes peace throughout the world.
Releases enormous sums of money for humanitarian purposes.
Enables the release of over 6,000 patents of suppressed technologies that are being withheld from the public under the guise of national security, including free energy devices, antigravity, and sonic healing machines.

Kyle Hunt #conspiracy renegadetribune.com

This coronavirus crisis has been cooked up by the vampires of the world, who wish to inject us with their poisons and suck all the remaining life force from humanity. It should not really come as a surprise that medical organizations around the world use snakes as their symbols, when their form of medicine involves injecting people with their various venoms.

These organizations know that humans need direct sunlight to be happy and healthy, which is why they have severely restricted people’s time outside in nature and explicitly banned sunbathing as “non-essential.” If we don’t get Vitamin D, we are prone to get sick and then seek their tests and treatments. Even if we were “allowed” by the vampires to go out into the sun, we would likely be getting a severely restricted spectrum of the sun’s energy, since Bill Gates and other ruling psychopaths have been spraying different things into the sky to block out the sun.

Bill Gates is the technocrat who planned Event 201, which was a coronavirus pandemic simulation, right before Covid-19 appeared on the scene. It’s quite telling that this is all about a “corona” virus, when you realize what exactly they are doing. The corona of the sun is the outer atmosphere, extending far out from the solar surface, which is not usually visible to the naked eye because of the sun’s brightness. It eventually becomes what is known as the solar wind.

We are not even allowed to buy products grown directly from the sun’s energy, like fresh fruits and vegetables from farmers markets, and instead are encouraged to go to fast food drive-throughs for sustenance, showing how NONE of their “health” recommendations are actually intended to improve health.

Our rulers getting in the way of the sun is actually nothing new. For example, they put king Jesus, with his halo and corona of thorns, in front of the sun as the “son” of God, getting people to worship a rabbi in the church instead of taking in the real “light of the world” out in nature.

Various Incels #sexist incels.co

(Venomkore)

[RageFuel] Female “Introverts” piss me the fuck off

image

1st panel: A boy say “I’m a shy introvert”

2nd panel: A girl says “I’m a shy introvert”

3rd panel: Offscreen figures say to angry-looking boy: “Enjoy being alone”, “Man up fag”, “Fucking creep”, “Loser”

4th panel: Offscreen figures say to happy-looking girl: “Ur so cute lol”, “tfw no shy gf”, “Want to go out?”, “Well, let’s fix that”, “I like shy girls anyway :)”, “It’s OK, want to try and talk?”

this sums it up basically
But actually none of them are fucking introverts they say they are and still do low inhib shit all the time. I basically just play vidya all day. WTF DO THEY THINK BEING AN INTROVERT IS, WATCHING NETFLIX EVERY EVENING??? JFL at this, here is what real introverts are like

image

A father comes home saying “Are ya winning, son?” while his son lays there with blood pouring out of his head, having killed himself

(curryZoomercoomer)

Fact: All the shy and innocent foids are actually the biggest whores.

They just flash strangers on omegle and send snapchat nudes to the latest chad to ask her for them lol

Indeed, there is no such thing as an innocent virgin girl.

(Animecel2D)

They don’t exist. All of them crave attention.

(RemoveNormalfags)

Females are just introvert when no Chad is around.
They become very extrovert when there is a Chad.

(MayorOfKekville)

Foids think they are Introverts™ because they only go out 3 nights a week and wait for chad to make the first move.

(The Incel Decade)

Women can't be introverts any more than they can be Incel. Women are designed to be social.

Even the autists

(Boeuf)

"I'm like, so anxious, I cancelled my rendezvous with chad to sit inside and watch netflix and eat pizza. I'm so lonely like oh my god."
God fucken damn it I want to fucken pierce their heads with a bullet

(Jazavac)

they are all the same, terms like "introvert" are just cosmetic to them. much like make-up, they only use them to attract attention to themselves.

(Arthas93)

Nice read OP, agreed. Foids only call themselves introverts to get attention, specially from Chad. There is no such thing as "introvert foids", it's just an act, an attention grabbing tool.

Like when they say they have "depression". Their depression is not being engaged to a 6' Chad. Foids are showered 24/7 with attention, privileges, gifts, the opposite sex giving them validation and acceptance.

Worthless whores, one day their free ride will end. No good thing lasts forever.

(TheGambler2)

They think staying in and watching netflix some weekends(instead of getting banged by chad at a party) counts as introvert.Imagine being completely friendless autist ldaring at home daily because any social interaction is a failure while society continuously blames you for it

(Atavistic Autist)

image

>asl
feamle 19
>about yourself
i am crazy. i have ass burgers. i am incredibly cool and fun. i hardly shower. sleeping on my bed gives me anxiety so i sleep on the floor next
to it. ive given head to 2 different men multiple times. i scored a 1550 on my sat. i dont have a chair i was held back in 1st grade. im going to
vacation in new york next year. i am a normie.
>interests
adderall and pseudoscience
>looking for
i want to fall in love. i won't fall in love but ill make friends with you and lead you on if youre male or desperate.
>not looking for
sex offenders and aliens
>voice/video
im not stupid like you
>fav movie/vidya
shawshank redemption

A perfect example of a female introvert

le quirky xD

She is actually being tremendously honest due to her autism, and not pretending to be unique at all.

That's what's extraordinary about it. She even admits to her internal contradictions. "Ass burger" but "normie" (because foid), wanting to fall in love but really only leading males on (because they're "desperate"/sub-HSM).

larp

Perhaps, but I wouldn't count on it. Autistic foids tend to be very blatant about their intentions, insanities, and narcissistic personaliteeehees, whereas neurotypical foids are the ones who try to make themselves look better/different than they really are.

The way that you attributed the apparent honesty of an autistic slut to a "not like the other girl" tier LARP is quite ironic. Autistic people are often put under a lens of suspicion for being honest like this, when they're really, truly concealing nothing from the world, JFL.

In the case of autistic men, NTs will suspect them of being psychopathic mass-murderers or rapists or potential school shooters, when it's actually the charming Chad who has the 'bodies in his closet,' likes abusing women, and derives enjoyment from bullying others (and killing their spirits, if nothing else).

Fact: All the shy and innocent foids are actually the biggest whores.

In the case of foids with autism, it's paradoxically because they're more likely to be honest about being sluts, whereas extroverted foids often lie and try to seem of a higher social status.

The inverse of this, I'm sure, is that men with autism are more likely to be honest about being incel, whereas NT men lie more often and say they're Chad-tier.

Right to Know #conspiracy godlikeproductions.com

The Perverted GAY Food Agenda - GMO's and Chemicals that Make People Queer

BPA, and it's Replacement used in Plastics and thermal paper used in recipt printers

Soy - GMO and Non GMO, it raises estrogen levels.
includes eating Animals fed Soy.
Feminizes Boys
Girls hit Puberty at younger than normal age.

Corn Syrup / Processed Sugar and Alcohol Reduce Human Growth Hormones

Herbicide listed in video below, will post name after video part of post, just in case it is one of those words.

Solution, Use Glass or Stainless Steel to store/drink out of, Filter/Purify your water to remove (drugs and chemicals in the water supply)
Eat only Traditional Foods raised without
GMO, Organic Only.
Eat Animals that are fed Grass, and their Natural food diet and not given Vaccines, Chemicals and Antibiotics.
If animals are not raised on Factory Farms the need for Antibiotics is much, much lower because the conditions the animals live in are "natural" much healthier.

Unsprouted grains, sugar or fructose decrease seven of the 12 most important hormones.

Alcohol decreases your human growth hormone (HGH), one of your most potent built-in anti-aging hormones. Having just one alcoholic drink per day can decrease your HGH by 75 percent.

Magnesium supplements improve your sex hormone levels, including your testosterone and HGH.

High-quality protein from meat and fish, as well as healthy fats such as egg yolk, lard, and butter, will improve progesterone and DHEA secretion, as will an otherwise healthy Paleolithic (read: unprocessed, nutrient-rich organic) diet.

Progesterone can also be increased by several nutritional supplements, including vitamin A. As a general rule, fat-soluble vitamins will have a beneficial effect on sex hormones.

Theoderich #fundie reddit.com

NECROPHILIA
by Theoderich

I: Introduction
Very few text files have been written regarding the sexual tendencies and practices of necrophiliacs. While most people would prefer to believe that we do not exist we most certainly do as is obvious to anyone who visits a cemetery during our nightly rampages. Necrophiliacs prefer to go about their business alone; sharing is not a part of this alternative lifestyle as the corpse usually wears out fairly quickly. This is not to say that the occasional orgy involving four or five necrophiliacs and about a dozen or so corpses does not occur, but it is very rare. In this file I will describe common (and some uncommon) techniques which necrophiliacs use to gain satisfaction from their stiff partners. Hopefully these vivid descriptions will encourage you to go out to your local cemetery and to join our ranks!

II: Finding a partner

Finding a partner for your necrophiliac activities is definitely the hardest part. You not only have to gain access to the corpse but you also have to find one which suits your tastes. Granted, some necrophiliacs would screw roadkill if given the chance but most of us are more discriminating. Your chances depend upon where you pick up your date. If you have access to a morgue it would definitely be your best bet as the corpses there are usually the freshest and have not yet been treated for burial. They may be a bit chilly because they've been lying in the meat locker for days but that really shouldn't make a big difference to the determined necrophiliac. Cemeteries are a bit harder to deal with as finding a screwable corpse is harder to do. However, if you know how to interpret signs this shouldn't be a problem. If a grave consists of a mound of fresh dirt and is covered with flowers, chances are that the stiff hasn't been laying here for too long. Rotting flowers on the mound usually hint to the state of the corpse as well. Some people are exclusively into 'porking the bone', i.e. sex with skeletons. In this case you can dig up almost any grave and hope that the inhabitant hasn't yet disintegrated into dust. Try to scope out a fairly secluded cemetery for your passions unless you like a sense of danger to go along with the sex. Having anyone catch you in the act is NOT fun, and if you're picked up by a cop chances are that you won't be able to screw anything but Bubba behind bars for the next few decades. People are generally not understanding of the necrophiliac lifestyle, so it will probably be a long time before we can come out of the closet.

III: Preparation

Depending upon where you are at this point you'll have either a little or a lot of work to do. The person in the morgue will obviously have to do little more than to open the locker, pull the corpse out and bang away. If you're one of the cemetery people you'll have more work to do. An experienced necrophiliac is always equipped with the bare essentials: a shovel, vaseline and a box of rubbers. Why the shovel is needed should be obvious, but if the ground is hard then you might need more equipment to dig up your date. Vaseline is used to loosen the corpse up a bit. This makes it less likely for a body part to break off while you're having fun and it also prevents your mantool from becoming too irritated while screwing the dried out pussy. The BOX of condoms is used to play it safe; no necrophiliac should be without it. You never know which STDs your partner had during his/her lifetime, and believe me, it doesn't get any better after the person dies. You can put on more than one rubber for extra protection if it is warranted, but screwing a corpse without protection is just plain stupid unless you want to be the next date for a necrophiliac. If you're in a cemetery try to drag the corpse out of the grave and behind a bush or to another secluded place. Pumping away in the grave may seem more convenient, but it's a severe disadvantage to you if you need to take off in a hurry. Sometimes the corpse is too fragile to be moved; in that case make it fast. Or just break off the head, hand or lower torso and take it with you for added convenience.

Part IV: Techniques

So now you've got a stiff lying seductively in front of you, but you have no idea how to start. How you proceed from this point onward really depends upon what kind of person you are. The corpse will last longer if you treat it gently and with care, but if you prefer to go all out you'll probably receive greater satisfaction. There are many differences between screwing a live and a dead person which one needs to be aware of. Firstly, a corpse will never tell you to get off of it if you're being a bit rough and it will never complain no matter what kinky sexual practices you use it for. Screwing a corpse is also much more predictable because you can raise an arm, leg or whatever and it will still be in that position when you reach for it again. Take the arms and gently lock them in an embrace behind your back, or spread the legs to make sex a bit easier. If you want a great blowjob then lubricate your partner's mouth, lock it to your preferred width, insert and go for it. Although there's no tongue stimulation it's still worthwhile, and it's also safer than conventional sex. Corpses can also be recycled if treated properly. If you're a proficient embalmer you can keep a corpse for over five years if it has been properly embalmed. That's free sex whenever you want it! You naturally don't want to be too rough with an embalmed corpse though as they are more fragile. One final advantage of screwing corpses is that they are always in abundance. Based upon your sexual preferences you can designate a cemetery or a morgue as your territory and always find fresh partners to screw. Plus you don't have to resort to cheesy pickup lines or spend all your money in order to get a date. Necrophilia is a passion which is cheaply satisfied.

V. Conclusion
I hope that this text file will encourage you to go out and try necrophilia. Not many people do it, but that's precisely what makes it so much fun; it makes you feel special! If no living person would touch you with a 10 foot pole then try having sex with a corpse! Some of them are real beauties and it's an experience you'll never forget. There is no greater experience for a virgin than having his/her virginity taken by a corpse. Anyways, have fun and if you have any experiences you'd like to share then by all means do! Maybe necrophilia will enter the mainstream because of your efforts.

beeohdee #fundie disqus.com

Responding to story “DOJ Counters Greenville’s Shutdown of Drive-In Church Services, Vows to ‘Ensure Religious Freedom Remains Protected’”:

beeohdee:
This insanity needs to stop NOW. The virus will take it's toll. We are not GOD and cannot stop it. Over time it will then be succumb to herd immunity just the same as every other virus/flu has been overcome in any population since the fall of man. Prayer certainly will help. But to restrict peaceful gatherings, whether they be religious or not, is insanity. Our economic foundation is crumbling and OUR HEALTH WELL-BEING IS DEPENDENT ON A STRONG ECONOMIC FOUNDATION, as is every other facet of life! The purpose of these draconian regulations is NOT to restrict the spread of this virus, but to destroy our economy in a final effort to attain the ends that these people have been attempting to accomplish for at least the last 12 years... "to transform America." These enforcement efforts are an attempt to further that agenda. We need to oppose these unlawful regulations, peacefully; force mass arrests of peaceful citizens. We are fulfilling the truth stated in Romans 1:28, "and he gave them over to a reprobate mind to those things that are not proper."

Travis Kingston:
You can’t stop the virus but you can take measures to control how much destruction and death it causes. And it seems to me you oppose that.

beeohdee:
Where is it written that we can control destruction and death? You are absolutely correct, I am in <b>total</b> opposition to this madness that has enveloped our entire culture and the world.
As I said above, the virus WILL take its toll. What we control is whether we cause more destruction or less while it does what it is going to do, regardless of our believing that we can sit on God's throne and determine the course of events.
This is nothing more than a political opportunity for the 'transformers' of our culture to mold our politics after their own image. Romans 1:28 still applies, and we deserve it. But God is merciful to them that turn to him in time of need.

CH #racist heartiste.wordpress.com

The Schlomo-Shitlib Axis convulsed themselves into a heavy menstrual flow this past week over the Fake Atrocity of bawlin’ beanlets being temporarily separated from their beaner parents for processing by border control officials. The real atrocity is of course the child abuse committed by the parents for hauling their leetle darleengs across hundreds of miles of hot desert, beset by child smugglers, cartel murderers, rapists, and pedophiles at every pit stop, passing through the non-shithole country of Mexico en route to invading the oppressively racist country of America, to live la vida loco.

Naturally, Trump and his supporters are to blame for being Nazis or something. The media said so. It’s all connected. You just have to abandon your senses of sanity and hyperbole.

So many leftoid crocodile tears shed for bawlin’ beanlets dragged by their parents thousands of miles away from their homelands, while not a single tear spared for poor White kids who live a few towns over. Tears for the former are grace and empathy personified, while tears for the latter are gauche. That’s how moral enlightenment looks once refracted through the twisted shitlib mind.

“How dare you?” shrieks the anchorshitlib in high dudgeon when her Void-Cunt Conformism Test is defied by a wompin’ White man whose sympathies are more realistically and sincerely situated closer to home. “These poor (brown) children are being separated from their parents! IT’S A NATIONAL DISGRACE,” she screams through red face and eyes bulging with fire and brimstone. To which the only needed response is, “lol suk a dik, you leftoids are off your rockers. ‘Tender age’ kids are separated every day from their parents…it’s called elementary school!”

CRY ME ANOTHER RIVER OF SALTY TEARS, YOU INFANTILE FREAKS

But the shitlib won’t stop her descent into infantilism. There’s too much at stake, such as the much better moral high she can get from effortlessly sympathizing with faraway people who don’t look like her. Sympathizing with kin closer to home comes with expectations of real assistance, and why work for her hit of methamphetapreen when she can emote ineffectually over illegal aliens who can only trip her guilt from a distance.

The poster beanlet for this virtue signaling mass hysteria is a toddler girl who was photographed…wait for it…crying. Yes, stop the presses, a toddler was crying. It’s the next Watergate. Or Waterworks.

The aztot immediately became iconic to one half of the country. She was even featured on a Time fagazine cover:

...

The suspiciously coordinated Chaimstream Media moved quickly to action to give their shitlib audience what it craved: a narrative injection about no good, very bad, horribly racist BadWhites and the evil Trump Administration tearing a little crying girl from her mother. Never mind that the separation policy is twenty years old, enforced by Gay Mulatto and Trump alike.

Yellow journalism isn’t the right term for what’s going on today with the media, which is much worse than mere sensationalism. The media is now into passing off lies and suppressing truths to whip up fervor among their remnant shitlib followers in the hopes of inciting either an impeachment or an assassination of Trump. It’s that bad.

Manufactured emotionalism is the Chaimstream Media’s sole purpose now. Truth? Objectivity? Journalistic ethics? Sanity? Toss it in the bin, because the only thing that matters is winding up a bunch of hysterical cat ladies, urban sluts, and soyboys over the phony plight of foreign invaders who use their kids as “get into the US free” props. The media’s mottos can be condensed to “Anything to Get Trump” and “No Lie Too Big”.

It only took a day of media fluffing to give Shitlib America wood. Protests erupted. Celebrities jizzed themselves in ropes of self-righteous indignation. Trump officials were hounded out of restaurants and leftists threatened ICE patriots with bodily harm on Twatter (account suspensions delayed pending review of what level of incitement to violence is permissible if the threat is carried out by a leftoid…turns out, quite a lot).

But a funny thing happened (again) during this combo platter two minutes hate + two minutes sanctimony: the central figure — the core conceit — of the shitlib narrative collapsed, and made a farce of what was already a sham.

The bawlin’ beanlet was never separated from her mother.

The morbid humor doesn’t stop there. In the midst of the anti-Trump frenzy, ethical journalists at the Daily Caller and Breitbart reported a host of details that put the lie to every cherished mythology of the Left in their manufactured crisis du jour.

...

Trump was right. They really aren’t sending their best.

(left unstated: the toddler grows up to be a fat waddling adult bean who gives birth to five ms-13 gang members. #GenesMatter #RaceMatters)

Even when the Left thinks they have scored a battlefield victory, their delusions are exposed by the countervailing facts that inevitably surface a few sanity-check days later to put the lie to their anti-White narrative.

It’s almost clockwork-like now:

a propaganda photo of Browns Behaving Heartwarmingly goes viral
shitlibs celebrate their good fortune at getting the chance to once again paternalistically emote over a nonWhite while denouncing Trump and TrumpWhites who insufficiently grovel before the Equalism Monolith
a disingenuous moral panic ensues, recharging shitlib batteries depleted by the Trumpening and the creeping realization that their noble savage worldview is on the verge of implosion
as shitlib menstrual cycles are synchronizing, a trickle and then a deluge of contradicting facts escapes from dissident media outlets, destroying any slim justification for the shitlib hysterics
shitlibs and their media symbiote ignore the contradicting facts, pretending their entire narrative wasn’t just discredited (but enough realtalk pierces their bubbles that another bout of cogdis pushes them one step closer to the funny farm)

That last item is important, because it’s proof that shitlibs don’t really care about the bawlin’ beanlets. If they really cared about the leetle crying beanlet, they would express relief that she wasn’t actually separated from her mother. They would be happy that their worst fear wasn’t realized. Instead, they ignore the heartening news to continue slandering Trump with the melodramatic blood libel that he’s building concentration camps for the saints.

The Great Bawlin’ Beanlet Hoax of 2018 was always about Trump and what he and his followers represent: a disturbing lack of faith in the value of histrionic anti-White moralism. It was, yet again, a theatrical piece of agitprop around which shitlibs could coalesce into an uptalking choir of smarmy self-righteousness revealing an increasingly fragile superiority complex over those deplorable Whites who don’t commute to work via bike lane. Every modren day madness roiling the Hajnalsphere is just another front in the IntraWhite War.

It’s virtue signaling all the way down. Don’t let the torrent of tears fool you. (For one, shitlibs cry over anything. They aren’t known for emotional continence.) The tears aren’t for the children; the tears are for other shitlibs: briny droplets of estrogen that serve as club membership dues and backstage passes to polite society. When the tears streak in unison, shitlibs experience something akin to a mass hypnotic event; their atomized striver existence is, for a brief window, mutually connected to a larger community and social purpose that evokes a feeling of religious transcendence and earthy authenticity which they commonly lack and consequently endlessly try-hard to achieve.

In truth, children have always only ever been one of two things to the typical White shitlib: inconveniences, or soldiers to recruit for the cause. Satanic, really.

The scum who pushed the Bawlin’ Beanlet blood libel on gullible Whites by exploiting a bug in their high trust, guilt-based, empathobesic code should be reminded up front and as often as possible that America is not the fucking daycare center of the world. Beanlets separated from their parents because the parents tried to invade a foreign country? PARENTS’ FAULT. Claiming anything else is simply opportunistic moralism leveraged to tactical advantage by SWPL elites and sub-elites desperate to keep out of their halls of power and striver circles any incursions by declassé Whites riding a wave of revolutionary churn.

A slim majority of Americans is sane enough to understand the moral calculus, but a disconcertingly large minority prefers moral inversion, because the goal here isn’t moral clarity. It’s battlefield advantage. Precursors to Civil War 2…

Sparrow's Song #sexist incels.co

[SuicideFuel] Even if a becky or stacy accepted you despite your hideous face, it's still better just to rope.

Let's say a becky or stacy that was a NAWALT actually existed and loved you despite how ugly you are (which is impossible), you would still be a subhuman, your existence would still be an unbearable facial hell and the beckoning of the rope would not subside. Most of the non larping incels here would disagree, but the legit truecel subhumans might understand.

Having a loving partner would destroy your soul even more. It's already bad enough to see yourself in the mirror and see everything that makes you less than human and unworthy of life, having a girlfriend would make it worse because it means that another human will also see that untermensch face every day. The same goes for if you could somehow make friends irl despite how much of a facial boneless, asymmetrical, rotting freak you are. Every human you interact with in real life, whether it's a stranger you walk past, a co-worker, a friend, or even a girlfriend is another human who knows that you physically exist. The knowledge that you are a person that exists in now in their mind, and when they think of you they will think of your face. That's why it's better to never leave your house until it's time to off yourself, because the less people know you exist, the less painful your existence is.

Having a girlfriend would be one of the most brutal reminder of your worthless existence. It doesn't matter if she somehow has a goblin fetish and finds you attractive, you are still trapped behind a face that would look better if it was splattered by a shotgun. You know the first time you saw a mangled dead body on BestGore? That's how she would feel every time she saw your face, even if she somehow "loved" you, there is no way her instinctive disgust could be overcome. Imagine how suicide inducing it would be to have to make physical intimate contact with another human WHO CAN SEE YOUR FACE. How could you even live with the thought of your inbred, genetic trash face... connected to your pathetic manlet body... having sex? How would you not cry and want to kill yourself immediately if a foid was trying to have sex with you? How would you even be able to get hard and have sex while the depressing and dark thoughts of your mind are telling you that you are so ugly that any sexual act you engage in is cringe or you're imagining the whole thing? How would she bring herself to allow her skin to touch yours? How would her pussy not dry up immediately? How would she not feel as if she is being violated by a facially disabled freak? How would she not regret it and #MeToo you right after? How would she not kill herself in shame and disgust?

Imagine living with someone who sees your subhuman face every day? You cannot hide from them. She would think you're pathetic as you cry in the bathroom when you see yourself in the mirror. You'd want as much time away from her as possible. It's always better to be ugly and alone than to be ugly in the presence of other living things. There is no hug for your face, there is no kiss for your face, there is no hand holding for your face, there is not cuddling for your face, there is no blowjob for your face, there is no sex for your face. Suffering a worthless life of facial disgrace is bad enough as it is, there is no reason to allow another human to witness your facial suffering in person every day.

Obviously, it's impossible for a foid to accept an ugly faced man anyway, but even if it was possible... it would not fix your face.

Surgery or suicide.

Edmund_Kemper #sexist #transphobia incels.co

[RageFuel] Bluepilled fags try to argue against me on fstdt

This bluepilled faggot named Swede reads that I said most people like him only agree with what everyone else believes and how if he lives in a society where society had different values his values would be different

then he says “i aCcEpT hOmOs aNd TrAnNiEs BeCaUsE iT’S rIgHt” no you don’t. And then he says in the 50s people were still pretty live and let live yeah go back to that era and kiss another man in public or kiss a black person and you’d get beaten up or yelled at. If he seriously thinks he would’ve accept homos back then he’s wrong. He would’ve hated them back then. And only 4% of Americans approved to interracial marriage back then. This retard cuck thinks he’d be part of that 4%. He thinks he’d resist Kim jong un if he lived in North Korea or would’ve resisted Hitler if he lived in nazi Germany when only a tiny percent of Germans did that. Then he says marrying jb foids wasn’t common back in Ancient Greece because pederasty happened back then. Just because teen boys fucked adult men back then doesn’t mean adult men didn’t marry jb foids. Several sources say girls usually married in their mid-teens to a man twice their age and then he says they were prolly bad wives back then because they were young teens even though teens grew up faster back then. And the teen brain thing is a myth (look it up)

keep an eye on this bluepilled website
Edmund_Kemper #wingnut
here’s the link

I hate the openness of the 21st century.
We allow too much degeneracy.

If he lived in the 50s he would’ve hated homos

Most likely.

Let’s be honest. The only reason why people approve of trannies with cocks using the women’s room is because we’re gonna be labeled “bigots” and get hassled if we don’t approve of it. 10 years ago nobody would’ve approved of it because they were allowed to disapprove

imagine thinking that trannies are a legit thing

Trannies are the most annoying retards online especially that sjw trannyfag Sam Collins

there is no tranny
trannies are males, even if they think otherwise

High IQ

Do you go out of your way to find these faggots? I don't encounter them nearly as often.

I heard of that forum so I check em once in a while

That place seems just as soy as Reddit. What a nightmare.

It’s like another clone of IT

Anonymous #sexist desuarchive.org

So as you know Mike Vogel I guess confirmed that Scootaloo's "aunts" are pretty much dykes.

Honestly I'm not too worried about conservative backlash from right-wing family groups that will bash on Hasbro for this decision (this is kinda inevitable and do expect something like this to happen very soon).

I'm more worried about how the fandom itself will react. Obviously you have the /pol/acks that will scream "muh degeneracy". But a lot of people here will probably fail to take into account are the autistic SJW larps that will see this as some victory for social justice. (Wow, gay characters in a children's toy franchise. How stunning and brave of you. I mean you could help kids in Africa get access to food. But first world problems are more important.) I mean honestly if Hasbro decides to continue with this then eventually this fandom which is already seen as cancer by many will be seen as a stage 4 tumor just like the Steven Universe fandom or the worst case scenario the Rick and Morty fandom because of all the autists that will sperg out and show off how they are such a high IQ "intellectual" for watching a kid's T.V. show about magic equines.

I mean if you're happy that Hasbro is doing this then good for you and more power to you. But the way I see it if Hasbro and the show's staff aren't careful then there's a really good chance they will find themselves in the same awkward position as the freaking writers that work on Rick and Morty.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-GC5rAX0xHg

theangryamerican #fundie ethicalcringe.tumblr.com

image

(The person who made this probably rages at the mere mention of the word “antifa”)

Nobody rages at the words antifa. The group is the laughing stock of the world right now. It’s a bunch of beta males who have to ask their mom to make them a sandwich before they go out and put on masks to LARP on 75 year old Trump supporters in a 12:1 ratio until they are encountered by Based Stickman and beaten back into the depths of Hell whence they came. Had to reblog it just because this shit is too comical.

Herschel #sexist #racist psychologytoday.com

Women are held to much, much lower standards than men. They are basically children trying to compete with adults. It's not just in PE class, it's in every facet of life. Women can get away with acting like children these days so they do. They're just incredibly bitchy and pretentious. I hope you all continue to live your miserable lives with your disgusting cats. Soon, you will realize who the good guys were. It was the white men, but your envy did not allow you to see that, so now the world is turning into a shithole of non-whites.

Also, your whole attitude is just disgusting as well. You can always tell when it's a woman talking on the internet. You can tell because their level of self-esteem is about 100x higher than it should be. "How dare he suggest that women are more childish than men. I bet he couldn't come up with a single example. And, if he does, I'll gaslight him."

Various Incels #sexist incels.co

(KingOfRome)
[Serious] The world would be a better place if all femoids were shipped off to the sun.

Anyone agree?

(Poll)
Agree?
Yes | Votes: 12 | 66.7%
No | Votes: 6 | 33.3%

(SkinnyBaldcel)
Considering that would mean the end of humanity.. Then yes but I still want to have a foid with me so personally it wouldn't be better for myself

(Albocel)
Absolutly. Female humans are fucking vermin. All of them

(Evil Genius)
Yes.

(Mainländer)
Killing all women :no:
Sexually enslaving all women :yes:

(GameDevCel)
all the man in the planet would start hunting efeminite males to fuck, i would be like fucking jail but everywhere, considering most dudes here are bellow 6 feet and noit jacked, noo, i don't to have my ass raped by some hobo
@Mainländer

Killing all women :no:
Sexually enslaving all women :yes:

don't neet to be sexual slavering, just brainwashing them to be submissive would be a massive help

(anon)
@SkinnyBaldcel
Considering that would mean the end of humanity..

>he thinks men wouldn't figure out a way to make do without foidfilth
:soy:

(Michael5651)
Yes, end humanity.

(SkinnyBaldcel)
@anon

>he thinks men wouldn't figure out a way to make do without foidfilth
:soy:

Yea artificial insemination but if you want society to continue to exist then you are:soy:

(anon)
@SkinnyBaldcel

Yea artificial insemination but if you want society to continue to exist then you are:soy:

You are a reddit fag soyboy for thinking men need women to survive. Kill yourself, newshit.

(chesscel)
yes, but it would be better to have farms or breeding concentration camps for them so humanity doesnt die

(SecondComing)
Mankind was a mistake.

(anon)
@chesscel

yes, but it would be better to have farms or breeding concentration camps for them so humanity doesnt die

Keep 1-5% of foids alive as sex slaves.

(SkinnyBaldcel)
@anon
You are a reddit fag soyboy for thinking men need women to survive. Kill yourself, newshit.

You don't get my point, my point was that society needs to be whiped off so when all women are gone men should NOT be allowed to do anything to maintain society cause life is pointless and humans are shit you low IQ brainlet

(Red Pill Rage)
@Albocel

Absolutly. Female humans are fucking vermin. All of them

They're incel hate machines.

(Insomniac)
Yes bro.

(Life Wasted)
The world would be a better place if the sun died and took earth with it.

wernmax #fundie bikeforums.net

Regarding government employees going to food banks during the shutdown

Lowlifes. They live a lifetime on the public dole as their Statist government games the Public Treasury, leaving it with multi-trillions of dollars of debt that will never be repaid and that also rapidly devalues the currency we all get "paid" in, then they run to foodbanks set up for actual poor people and overwhelm them with their "need" because they never put away a nest egg while the money was coming in and they were busy living the expected American Lifestyle of nice houses, nice cars, good restaurants, and lots of entertainment, all the while trusting their criminal government to take care of their every want to the detriment of all the people not getting government money. Screw them to hell.

I'm sure their criminal government will set up 70% tax rates so they can get paid and go on with their partying and debt binge.

Eugenicist #sexist sluthate.com

Girls and their disinformation to the redpill.

Girls do not like to be analyzed. They're machiavellian masterminds in their own concept of inner self. They have to be in order for them to have power. Power through artifice, evasion, resourcefulness and vigilance. They want to be the one who analyzes you, not the other way around. They're value suckers. They invest in you only insofar as how valuable you are. That is all. Transaction or

If you drop a redpill, confronting their artifice in anyway that cracks past it, or any conception of having a clue you will either be cut out, deliberately be manipulated, almost entirely treated as someone to be replaced.

You cannot have an objective perspective/ robotic and get pussy unless you are the Alpha of all Chads with looks. You need to use inference, intuition, dissection and ingurgitate all information. But you need the LMS to get investment. CPW, Charisma, Personality, Wits are the personality which usually take the backseat 95% of the time.

It's all about transaction that's exclusive to you. The PUA are puppets. Fools.

All personality traits must indicate not charm, wits, charisma alone. That comes off as try hard, as a sign of forcing or trying to make validation happen. All personality/ character value must come from things which indicator power, experience, inner strength, ability, unprecedented aptitude, and occasional wit but only wit that gives you the impression of an intelligence that has ability behind it. Intellect without ability is pointless.

Personality traits are an extension of your dominance/ value. Not esoteric sophistication.

Interaction/ Interest/ Investment is merit based. And although the standard of merit is subjective, it falls in with LMS most of the time. So often that PUA tactics are rendered defunct. Only Autistics would invest in it. People who are oblivious to the biological conventions humanity lives by. They're in another world.


Girls are dishonest and stick to their inner agendas no matter what. Their inner desires will ultimately always possibly overstep, overlap, overbear yours. You just need to meet all the marks that is in their criteria to turn them to investment. That's all you can do until we return to an Islamic esque enslavement of women.

Sea_Safer #fundie #homophobia #transphobia #wingnut reddit.com

[on Taiwan legalizing gay marriage]

This changes my mind.
Taiwan is China. All traces of Taiwanese national distinction should be wiped out and replaced by Chinese. These degenerates need to bend the knee.

They think that because they can trace their political history back to the Emperors that they are the true China.
This is not in keeping with Allahs teachings. The only true China is the one capable of defending its divine mandate - i.e Daddy Xi > whatever faggy crap this is

If hong kong goes the way of the degenerate west China needs to send in the tanks and clean house.

I don’t understand why reddit cares so much about HK. It’s a fucking shithole of a city, overpriced, overcrowded and all around filled with these arrogant cantos. Nuke it down china daddy

I'll only support HK independence if they too denounce homosexuality and blacks

this, but unironically

My priorities for HK:
conversion to islam
expulsion of the white devils
denouncement of bussy and trannyism

also good

Groidimore The Uglyful #racist blogger.com

Let us just face the harsh cold fact that baseball is a thinking man's game replete with strategy and tactical decisions. Clearly this is not a game for an African latrine and human shithole like Groidimore.

OTOH, basketball, wherein jumping like tree monkeys and non stop crotch scratching are at a premium is far better suited to these nit-picking Mau Maus.

BTW, all you caucasions who love basketball would be better off going to the zoo and studying the real thing - and they don't even need white coaches!

Chronosbeamz & RadiantUpstairs #sexist reddit.com

(Chronosbeamz)

Why do only soyfags and foids still try to argue against this

Because foids only think with their pussies. All their braincels went to the pleasure center and left a void in any critical thinking regions.

numales drank too much soy and it's destroyed their testosterone/estrogen balance so they're essentially a foid in a male body.

(RadiantUpstairs)
Well, get rid of the idea that there is some objective, truth-seeking drive. Maybe a few have that, but even that will develop due to some selection pressure. Organisms only do things because of pressures exerted upon them. Females have no selection pressure for anything other than seeking high-quality sperm, and they understand that the current situation allows for them to do that, so they don't want things to change.

Saudade #sexist incels.co

RE: [Blackpill] [Slavpill] Russia among has the highest rates of abortion in the world

Ukraine and Belarus are aslo at the top of the list

Extra degenerate slav foids are too busy riding a non-slavic man's massive thundercock that they are forget about contraceptions.People should stop seeing slavic foids as goddesses

Serbia too. Slavic countries are extremely matriarchal and feminist since times of communism. I actually go around foids forums and i look up the reasons why they kill their kids and its comical, they always say how they are good persons because she wouldn't have afforded a baby branded clothes or vacations every year (richest county in Serbia has lowest birth rate), she is busy with studying some useless shit, she is too young in her 20s to have a kid, world is overpopulated, i want child free life, some are already on their third of fourth abortions, some are so deluded they still call themselves Christian and they pray in Church before abortion and thank God that it all finished well and they know God will forgive them because she wasnt ready for a kid (LOL). Then the first thing they ask is can i have sex immediately after abortion or can i have kids in future (they wanna pop one kid in late 30s so it can take care of her when she gets old). Reality is that they are extremely materialistic, hedonistic and nihilistic and they see children as burden and investment that threatens their commodity and cock carousel, but they still want to push this bullshit about how noble they were for ending a life of a baby that would "suffer" because it would wear cheap clothes and have Chinese smartphone instead of Iphone, when they eventually pop one kid then they will act as greatest and most conservative mother ever ignoring their abortion counts. They are extremely uneducated about their bodies or anatomy, only 20% use protection, they also have tendencies to blame everything on men ignoring that they chose those same men, they all want to "experience life" aka party and ride cock carousels and then they want to be mothers in mid 30s (seriously i barely see any women in 20s with kids) but most of them cant find partners anymore due to low fertility and old age. If someone suggests that maybe you should watch with whom you sleep or dont be promiscuous or use protection then they will say that you are close minded, religious and patriarchal fanatic, backwards nut, my body my choice etc, they also get offended or insulted when Chadimir asks them about sex count or abortions count (past is past teehee). 16 year old girl can abort legally and parents will never know, doctors tell women here to hide their abortions from parents or partners so they can pretend to be religious and innocent until they lock up some naive betabuxxer. Mini lifefuel is that most of those foids when i read say that they cant forgive themselves for what they did, they want to go back in time and stop it, they cry when they see pregnant women and babies in public, they have nightmares, they become extremely depressed and suicidal, some become infertile, some start giving many births to compensate, some take radical feminist stances to hide their sorrow etc. By raw statistics on average every woman in this country aborted 3 times during her lifetime, and in same time people here are trying to present this shithole as "conservative", "traditional", "Christian" etc, 84% of people here declare themselves as """"""""Christian""""""""" which is laughable and insulting to real followers.

caamib #sexist #psycho fstdt.com

(In regards to comments on a quote of his where he proclaims himself a “limited political pedophile”)

first anon-

"Yeah I have a question. Can we put you in prison before you hurt someone."

No. I am not committing a crime by saying this. I am merely explaining a political view.

Kanna - "Some females at some time ignored you, therefore all females at all times should be penalized"

What the fuck are you rambling about? I don't care about women who ignored me at all, they didn't do any damage to me at all. The ones who didn't ignore me were the ones who could hurt me. I also never say that all should be penalized, I specifically state which ones should.

Kadorloon - " what makes you think outright admitting you'd have sex with a toddler is in any way, shape or form a good idea? "

The same thing that makes anybody state our their political ideas.

"Oh, right, brain damage. "

Hahahah, here we go again. The same cretin who wants citations about everything is making a completely unverifiable claim again, after I warned him many times about it. Still claiming I am living in a mental hospital while never taking me up on my offer to talk on Skype at 3 AM? Only an American can be this dumb and have this little self-awareness.

"EDIT: and, no, no one else in the world cares what made-up distinctions
you make to pretend a toddler from America "deserves it" "

No one else? Made up distinctions? Tell it to tens of thousands of men who have already left America and other feminist countries to find wives in non-feminist places in the world. Tell them how rape worshipping scum like modern Western women are no different than sane non-feminist ones. You imbecile !

"more than a toddler from some Middle Eastern sharia hellhole that you hold as the epitome of morality because they'd just straight-up kill her."

What ?!

A toddler from a non-feminist country doesn't deserve it at all, and nobody would kill such a toddler, but the ones who would rape such a female toddler. It would be a horrific crime, while it would be honorable act in America, as American women are scum. So are Western men, as evidenced by you. The fuck did you get the idea that somebody would just kill a raped toddler in the Middle East? Or that Middle East is the only non-feminist region of the world? Or that Middle East is a shithole, while some of the wealthiest countries in the world are situated there? You're a cretin, Kadorloon.

"Not only are you disgusting but you just contradicted yourself."

I am not. I explicitly say IT IS NOT ABOUT ATTRACTION and am even expressing doubts about my ability to get a hard on somebody that young. It's a political matter, limited political pedophilia.

ShySaxon #sexist incels.co

[It's Over] [COPE] The football/soccer team you backed is getting hammered 6-0 with only a minute left to play...

Suddenly some guy gets up and says...
“They still have a chance bro they can still win!”

It’s not even cope at that point, it’s STUPIDITY.
It is blatantly over for the losing team.
The same applies for Incels. I’m an ugly manlet and I’m autistic as fuck. My best trait? Being white. That’s it. Yet bluepilled soy man here still thinks that I can ascend.

It is fucking over. Done and dusted. I’m sub 8, an autistic freak and I’m a manlet. It doesn’t take a fucking genius to figure out that I’m not going to get laid. Stop denying what’s in front of you, stop embarrassing yourself and stop fucking coping. It’s over.

Sans #sexist incels.wiki

Soy points, also known as karma are worthless internet points that can be obtained on Reddit when someone “upvotes“ your post. Due to Reddit’s hive mind mentality, posting things that go with the mainstream will get you lots of soy points, while stepping out of line will cause you to lose them. Similarly, due to the cucked nature of Reddit, simply being a female (usually signified by putting “female here” before a post) will get you thousands of soy points, while saying anything about them that isn’t emphatic praise will make you lose them.

BrazilianSigma, the most well-known member of the incelphobic hate group IncelTears, has over one million soy points.

Gedaliah Braun #racist halcyoninitiative.wordpress.com

[Part 3]

Gruesome cruelty

Another aspect of African behavior that liberals do their best to ignore but that nevertheless requires an explanation is gratuitous cruelty. A reviewer of Driving South, a 1993 book by David Robbins, writes:

“A Cape social worker sees elements that revel in violence … It’s like a cult which has embraced a lot of people who otherwise appear normal. … At the slightest provocation their blood-lust is aroused. And then they want to see death, and they jeer and mock at the suffering involved, especially the suffering of a slow and agonizing death.” (Citizen [Johannesburg], July 12, 1993, p.6.)

There is something so unspeakably vile about this, something so beyond depravity, that the human brain recoils. This is not merely the absence of human empathy, but the positive enjoyment of human suffering, all the more so when it is “slow and agonizing.” Can you imagine jeering at and mocking someone in such horrible agony?

During the apartheid era, black activists used to kill traitors and enemies by “necklacing” them. An old tire was put around the victim’s neck, filled with gasoline, and—but it is best to let an eye-witness describe what happened next:

“The petrol-filled tyre is jammed on your shoulders and a lighter is placed within reach . … Your fingers are broken, needles are pushed up your nose and you are tortured until you put the lighter to the petrol yourself.” (Citizen; “SA’s New Nazis,” August 10, 1993, p.18.)

The author of an article in the Chicago Tribune, describing the equally gruesome way the Hutu killed Tutsi in the Burundi massacres, marveled at “the ecstasy of killing, the lust for blood; this is the most horrible thought. It’s beyond my reach.” (“Hutu Killers Danced In Blood Of Victims, Videotapes Show,” Chicago Tribune, September 14, 1995, p.8.) The lack of any moral sense is further evidenced by their having videotaped their crimes, “apparently want[ing] to record … [them] for posterity.” Unlike war criminals, who hid their deeds, these people apparently took pride in their work.

In 1993, Amy Biehl, a 26-year-old American on a Fulbright scholarship, was living in South Africa, where she spent most of her time in black townships helping blacks. One day when she was driving three African friends home, young blacks stopped the car, dragged her out, and killed her because she was white. A retired senior South African judge, Rex van Schalkwyk, in his 1998 book One Miracle is Not Enough, quotes from a newspaper report on the trial of her killers: “Supporters of the three men accused of murdering [her] … burst out laughing in the public gallery of the Supreme Court today when a witness told how the battered woman groaned in pain.” This behavior, Van Schalkwyk wrote, “is impossible to explain in terms accessible to rational minds.” (pp. 188-89.)

These incidents and the responses they evoke—“the human brain recoils,” “beyond my reach,” “impossible to explain to rational minds” — represent a pattern of behavior and thinking that cannot be wished away, and offer additional support for my claim that Africans are deficient in moral consciousness.

I have long suspected that the idea of rape is not the same in Africa as elsewhere, and now I find confirmation of this in Newsweek:

“According to a three-year study [in Johannesburg] … more than half of the young people interviewed — both male and female — believe that forcing sex with someone you know does not constitute sexual violence … [T]he casual manner in which South African teens discuss coercive relationships and unprotected sex is staggering.” (Tom Masland, “Breaking The Silence,” Newsweek, July 9, 2000.)

Clearly, many blacks do not think rape is anything to be ashamed of.

The Newsweek author is puzzled by widespread behavior that is known to lead to AIDS, asking “Why has the safe-sex effort failed so abjectly?” Well, aside from their profoundly different attitudes towards sex and violence and their heightened libido, a major factor could be their diminished concept of time and reduced ability to think ahead.

Nevertheless, I was still surprised by what I found in the Zulu dictionary. The main entry for rape reads: “1. Act hurriedly; … 2. Be greedy. 3. Rob, plunder, … take [possessions] by force.” While these entries may be related to our concept of rape, there is one small problem: there is no reference to sexual intercourse! In a male-dominated culture, where saying “no” is often not an option (as confirmed by the study just mentioned), “taking sex by force” is not really part of the African mental calculus. Rape clearly has a moral dimension, but perhaps not to Africans. To the extent they do not consider coerced sex to be wrong, then, by our conception, they cannot consider it rape because rape is wrong. If such behavior isn’t wrong it isn’t rape.

An article about gang rape in the left-wing British paper, the Guardian, confirms this when it quotes a young black woman: “The thing is, they [black men] don’t see it as rape, as us being forced. They just see it as pleasure for them.” (Rose George, “They Don’t See it as Rape. They Just See it as Pleasure for Them,” June 5, 2004.) A similar attitude seems to be shared among some American blacks who casually refer to gang rape as “running a train.” (Nathan McCall, Makes Me Wanna Holler, Vintage Books, 1995.)

If the African understanding of rape is far afield, so may be their idea of romance or love. I recently watched a South African television program about having sex for money. Of the several women in the audience who spoke up, not a single one questioned the morality of this behavior. Indeed, one plaintively asked, “Why else would I have sex with a man?”

From the casual way in which Africans throw around the word “love,” I suspect their understanding of it is, at best, childish. I suspect the notion is alien to Africans, and I would be surprised if things are very different among American blacks. Africans hear whites speak of “love” and try to give it a meaning from within their own conceptual repertoire. The result is a child’s conception of this deepest of human emotions, probably similar to their misunderstanding of the nature of a promise.

I recently located a document that was dictated to me by a young African woman in June 1993. She called it her “story,” and the final paragraph is a poignant illustration of what to Europeans would seem to be a limited understanding of love:

“On my way from school, I met a boy. And he proposed me. His name was Mokone. He tell me that he love me. And then I tell him I will give him his answer next week. At night I was crazy about him. I was always thinking about him.”

Moral blindness

Whenever I taught ethics I used the example of Alfred Dreyfus, a Jewish officer in the French Army who was convicted of treason in 1894 even though the authorities knew he was innocent. Admitting their mistake, it was said, would have a disastrous effect on military morale and would cause great social unrest. I would in turn argue that certain things are intrinsically wrong and not just because of their consequences. Even if the results of freeing Dreyfus would be much worse than keeping him in prison, he must be freed, because it is unjust to keep an innocent man in prison.

To my amazement, an entire class in Kenya said without hesitation that he should not be freed. Call me dense if you want, but it was 20 years before the full significance of this began to dawn on me.

Africans, I believe, may generally lack the concepts of subjunctivity and counterfactuality. Subjunctivity is conveyed in such statements as, “What would you have done if I hadn’t showed up?” This is contrary to fact because I did show up, and it is now impossible for me not to have shown up. We are asking someone to imagine what he would have done if something that didn’t happen (and now couldn’t happen) had happened. This requires self-consciousness, and I have already described blacks’ possible deficiency in this respect. It is obvious that animals, for example, cannot think counterfactually, because of their complete lack of self-awareness.

When someone I know tried to persuade his African workers to contribute to a health insurance policy, they asked “What’s it for?” “Well, if you have an accident, it would pay for the hospital.” Their response was immediate: “But boss, we didn’t have an accident!” “Yes, but what if you did?” Reply? “We didn’t have an accident!” End of story.

Interestingly, blacks do plan for funerals, for although an accident is only a risk, death is a certainty. (The Zulu entries for “risk” are “danger” and “a slippery surface.”) Given the frequent all-or-nothing nature of black thinking, if it’s not certain you will have an accident, then you will not have an accident. Furthermore, death is concrete and observable: We see people grow old and die. Africans tend to be aware of time when it is manifested in the concrete and observable.

One of the pivotal ideas underpinning morality is the Golden Rule: do unto others as you would have them do unto you. “How would you feel if someone stole everything you owned? Well, that’s how he would feel if you robbed him.” The subjunctivity here is obvious. But if Africans may generally lack this concept, they will have difficulty in understanding the Golden Rule and, to that extent, in understanding morality.

If this is true we might also expect their capacity for human empathy to be diminished, and this is suggested in the examples cited above. After all, how do we empathize? When we hear about things like “necklacing” we instinctively — and unconsciously — think: “How would I feel if I were that person?” Of course I am not and cannot be that person, but to imagine being that person gives us valuable moral “information:” that we wouldn’t want this to happen to us and so we shouldn’t want it to happen to others. To the extent people are deficient in such abstract thinking, they will be deficient in moral understanding and hence in human empathy—which is what we tend to find in Africans.

In his 1990 book Devil’s Night, Ze’ev Chafets quotes a black woman speaking about the problems of Detroit: “I know some people won’t like this, but whenever you get a whole lot of black people, you’re gonna have problems. Blacks are ignorant and rude.” (pp. 76-77.)

If some Africans cannot clearly imagine what their own rude behavior feels like to others—in other words, if they cannot put themselves in the other person’s shoes—they will be incapable of understanding what rudeness is. For them, what we call rude may be normal and therefore, from their perspective, not really rude. Africans may therefore not be offended by behavior we would consider rude — not keeping appointments, for example. One might even conjecture that African cruelty is not the same as white cruelty, since Africans may not be fully aware of the nature of their behavior, whereas such awareness is an essential part of “real” cruelty.

I am hardly the only one to notice this obliviousness to others that sometimes characterizes black behavior. Walt Harrington, a white liberal married to a light-skinned black, makes some surprising admissions in his 1994 book, Crossings: A White Man’s Journey Into Black America:

“I notice a small car … in the distance. Suddenly … a bag of garbage flies out its window . … I think, I’ll bet they’re blacks. Over the years I’ve noticed more blacks littering than whites. I hate to admit this because it is a prejudice. But as I pass the car, I see that my reflex was correct—[they are blacks].

“[As I pull] into a McDonald’s drive-through … [I see that] the car in front of me had four black in it. Again … my mind made its unconscious calculation: We’ll be sitting here forever while these people decide what to order. I literally shook my head . … My God, my kids are half black! But then the kicker: we waited and waited and waited. Each of the four … leaned out the window and ordered individually. The order was changed several times. We sat and sat, and I again shook my head, this time at the conundrum that is race in America.

“I knew that the buried sentiment that had made me predict this disorganization … was … racist. … But my prediction was right.” (pp. 234-35.)

Africans also tend to litter. To understand this we must ask why whites don’t litter, at least not as much. We ask ourselves: “What would happen if everyone threw rubbish everywhere? It would be a mess. So you shouldn’t do it!” Blacks’ possible deficiency in abstract thinking makes such reasoning more difficult, so any behavior requiring such thinking is less likely to develop in their cultures. Even after living for generations in societies where such thinking is commonplace, many may still fail to absorb it.

It should go without saying that my observations about Africans are generalizations. I am not saying that none has the capacity for abstract thought or moral understanding. I am speaking of tendencies and averages, which leave room for many exceptions.

To what extent do my observations about Africans apply to American blacks? American blacks have an average IQ of 85, which is a full 15 points higher than the African average of 70. The capacity for abstract thought is unquestionably correlated with intelligence, and so we can expect American blacks generally to exceed Africans in these respects.

Still, American blacks show many of the traits so striking among Africans: low mathematical ability, diminished abstract reasoning, high crime rates, a short time-horizon, rudeness, littering, etc. If I had lived only among American blacks and not among Africans, I might never have reached the conclusions I have, but the more extreme behavior among Africans makes it easier to perceive the same tendencies among American blacks.

RadiantUpstairs, Top_Locksmith, FavelaSmegma #sexist #fundie reddit.com

Never forget this nuclear cuck

image

How does...that make...sense.

Only savages believe in collective guilt.

@Top_Locksmith

chapter 24 of das kapital, marx says that the original acumulation of resources by the bourgeoisie was achieved by stealing common land, therefore any person that has any money to this day is partner in that original sin.

translate that bullshit to this and there you go, numales slicing their dicks right off and chugging soy to get rid of the curse of masculinity

lol "common land."

Amorphous herd animals that had no individuality used to graze there!

@AramaeanNigmar

Even animals have territory and run off their competition, hoarding resources/females

Yeah, and if the competition wins, it's their territory now, it's not like they're "squatters" or "illegal invaders," that's just hypnocratic bullshit, putting people to sleep, having them dream that the land is theirs in spite of their feet not being on it.

@FavelaSmegma

the entire western white race has collective guilt for slavery and racism. They are super guilty and seething at the n word for things they never committed to people that never experienced them. There is 0 logic in this world.

There's plenty of logic, it's just not evenly distributed throughout the population.

Anna Diehl #fundie 924jeremiah.wordpress.com

People have been preaching that the end times are just around the corner for thousands of years. The New Testament Christians all thought that they were living in the last days. If they had been right, you never would have been born. But here you are, and of all people, God has chosen your time in history to start His global shutdown. This is a thrilling time to be alive. Cultivating reverence for God is an essential part of acquiring a closer relationship with Him, and nothing spikes your level of reverence faster than having God flex His awesome power in your face. Excelling in the end times is not a matter of learning to survive nasty torture and persecution from a bunch of Christian haters. It’s simply a matter of knowing where you personally stand with God and keeping a firm grip on a few essential truths. God is in control. God is always with you. God delights in souls who sincerely desire to please Him. You can do this. The Holy Spirit will help you.

BabyFuck McGirlsex #sexist #crackpot incels.co

[ToxicFemininity] Foids working in the Medical Field are the reason why no COVID-19 cure exists yet

Having foids working in scientific and medical fields essentially guarantees that virtually no scientific progress on COVID19 will be made as the foids larping as scientists will be too busy on tinder sexting chads.

Also foids "working" in the Life sciences as researchers will actually disturb & distract the men who are ACTUALLY working on the cure by wearing skimpy whore outfits and filthy fakeup and taking selfies and nudes to send to chad and sell to beta cucks.

Further to this, half the time the male Scientistcels will be perpetually living in fear of being #metoo'ed by their workmate foids such that their ability to quickly create a cure for St. COVID-19cel will be greatly impaired.

How is this relevant to the inceldom Discourse?

This validates what we in the Incel Cinematic Universe have known for years - remove all foids from the workforce and this will end inceldom, propel science and technology to the future and normalise the Sexual Market Place

Wuli #fundie freerepublic.com

No scientific foundation.

Yes, children can for some unknown reasons make believe they are something they are not, fantasize about that, and eventually form a obsession of belief in that fantasy; to their long term detriment.

That is not a “nuance”, it’s a problem. Left ignored, untreated and enabled by parents it becomes a lifetime problem from the individual which not even surgical abuse of the body can adequately make up for, no matter how hard it tries.

I have no problem with laws that would say no, you cannot teach and preach transgenderism in the schools. You can teach and preach it to yourself and in your own family but not to children in school.

Enable a mental obsession and call it “O.K.”? No.

Some incels #sexist reddit.com

Re: reddit: the front page of the internet

image

(PM_ME_YOUR_M1LKERS)

if any of you wanna larp and get free gold, heres your chance

(SlavaPutin)

I've done it with getting free games before.

(persia_cel)

this works as long as you're not caught, I got kingdom come deliverance and all ck2 dlcs like this

(I_CAPE_RUNTS)

I was ranked in top 10 of a certain game all because the #2 trained me because I had “chick” in my name

(BF8211)

I got ran through so many dungeons and quests by pretending to be a girl in WoW

Lmao, really? Did you fake voice in vent? What expansion was it in?

It was very low effort, made a new (female) character with a girly name and would type like a girl, I didn’t even have to search very hard before finding someone to help me out. Guys didn’t even care about verifying if I was real or not, they just did shit for me lmao.

This was during peak Lich King

(BillyCostiganBoston)

Brutal shit how foids cruise through life on easy mode

(Talmadge_McGulager_)

i got a ton of free shit just by being a female character and having a girlish sounding name. never even pretended to be one or anything.

i used to play a night elf female druid named Sprinkles and guys would “flirt” with me and give me free shit all the time. mounts, gold, gear, help with raids/pvp, etc. it was crazy. there’s so many desperate losers on wow that every woman is treated like a literal god

(FaggotHolyshit)

I had a guy give me the password to his Diablo II account because I told him I would be his girlfriend

Eugenicist #racist #sexist #crackpot incels.co

[Soy] JFL when manlets say "fighting ike a little bitch" when you fight dirty, yet use martial arts when it's essentially prescribed just for little bitches
Maratial arts wqwas develeoped in asia because of frameltism and manletism.
all manlets who even care to do martial arts or sports are compensating. There is no way that anyone with the jock mentality could possibly be not insecure if they are short. THe system of values contrast. Martial arts are just fighting dirty/ cheap shotting with a better reputation.
In the eyes of females doing anything mental shows low base value genetic requirement.
WOmen are only impressed by things that represent high genetic faculty.
WOMen want tyrants on their side, emboldened tryhard underdogs.
Martial arts were developed in East Asia for a REASON remember.

Donald Trump #fundie huffingtonpost.com

President Donald Trump, one of the richest men in America, wants you to believe he can empathize with federal employees who are struggling to make ends meet as the partial government shutdown heads into a third week.
The shutdown, already one of the longest in U.S. history, has left an estimated 800,000 federal workers either furloughed or, if deemed essential, working without pay.
“Mr. President, can you relate to the pain of federal workers who can’t pay their bills?” a reporter asked Trump outside the White House on Sunday.
“I can relate,” the president responded. “And I’m sure that the people that are toward the receiving end will make adjustments, they always do. And they’ll make adjustments. People understand exactly what’s going on.”
“Many of those people that won’t be receiving a paycheck, many of those people agree 100 percent with what I’m doing,” he added, without evidence.

Larsen Halleck #conspiracy returnofkings.com

3 Reasons Why Men Should Avoid Soy Products
Don't become a soy boy....!

Soy. The boogeyman of masculine men everywhere. Indeed, the term “soy” (and derivatives such as “soy boy”) itself has become a slang term encapsulating all that we hate about the state of modern manhood: weakness, effeminancy, soft facial features, and more.

But is that the case? We all know that soy is the only complete vegetable protein—which is to say it’s the only vegetable protein that has all of the essential amino acids—but is it really so bad for people in general and men in particular?

The short answer is: for “people” as a vague concept, no. It’ll keep you alive and functioning. But for MEN, specifically, seeking to be the best possible men they can be, the answer is a resounding yes.

What It Does, and Why It’s So Common

As I said above, soy will keep you alive—it is a complete protein, which means it will indeed give you enough protein to trudge through your daily life. That much, even I will not dispute.

As many have pointed out, soy is indeed an extremely common foodstuff and food additive, not just in its native East Asia but increasingly in the other four cardinal directions of the compass rose as well. Note that the three largest producers of soy beans, which make up a majority (80+%) of the world’s crop are all in the Western Hemisphere: the USA, Brazil, and Argentina.

And indeed, when I say it’s extremely common, I mean it with no hyperbole. In addition to just being eaten in its natural state, soybeans are processed into many foodstuffs such as the famous tofu and tempeh and vegetable oil. If that weren’t enough, textured vegetable protein, or TVP, is a soy product that is used as a filler/substitute in many meat/dairy substitutes and as an enhancer.

Why is it so common? While some conspiracy theorists would undoubtedly posit that this is all some fiendish Illuminati/Judeo-Satanist plot to emasculate men around the world, I don’t think that’s the case. Frankly, I’ve always believed in Hanlon’s Razor, the idea that you can never attribute to malice what can be attributed to stupidity—and I would paraphrase “laziness” for stupidity.

The simple reason for the preponderance of soy in the modern diet is simply that it is cheap, and corporations are primarily—and entirely— businesses, seeking to maximize their profits and minimize their expenditures. Thus, a cheap source of protein like soy is common, nevermind the side effects. And what are those side effects that deliberately harm men?

1. Hormonal Distress

Soy products are confirmed to inherently contain phytoestrogens, which can have estrogenizing effects on the human body. Indeed, they have been linked to positive effects for women, including the reduction of risks of certain types of cancer—and this happens to be the same effect that can occur with certain types of estrogen supplementation.

Since this is the case, we can also discuss the inverse (i.e. the same estrogenizing effects that are good for women will of course be bad for men). Of course, the issue is a matter of debate, but more than one study has reported negative hormonal effects of soy in men.

2. Decreased Male Fertility

Related to the above, a soy-heavy diet has also been linked to fertility dysfunction in men: lowered sperm counts and decreased semen quality. If you read this website, you’ve probably picked up somewhere or other that testosterone levels in the Western world are lower than they were in previous generations, and not only that, several studies have confirmed that testosterone and sperm counts are being lowered THROUGHOUT all Western countries.

Again, it’s not likely that this is a deliberate conspiracy, so much as an unfortunate side effect of cheapness and decreased quality of life.

3. Flatulence

And now going in a completely low brow direction, eating an excess of soy products has been linked to gastrointestinal distress. And needless to say, being associated with flatulence stink won’t do much for anything that you’re attempting to do, whether it be physical fitness, seduction, or business.

While one may not believe in the phenotypic changes associated with the stereotypically weak, spindly, soy eating male, the three reasons cited above are enough for any man to avoid this food.

What To Do

Seeing as soy isn’t required in the diet, avoiding it shouldn’t be so difficult. Just read all food product labels, avoid anything with soy, and avoid eating it directly. Replace it with animal proteins instead.

Make these simple changes, and see health and masculinity improve.

RP student #conspiracy reddit.com

East coast person here. I have many Jewish friends and colleagues. My direct report at work is a Jewish man and I largely play the loyal foot soldier to him on a daily basis.

I think 90% of Jews are either completely oblivious of or only vaguely aware of the ZOG / elitist Jewish conspiracy.
I think many of that 90% consider themselves to be essentially white people with curly hair that observe a religion that is only superficially different (menorahs instead of Christmas trees, Kosher food, Saturday Sabbath instead of Sunday etc.) from Christianity. However, virtually all of them have a sense that they are wise to oppose conservatism and nationalism, as shown by their voting patterns of supporting the Left parties despite falling predominantly in the upper-middle class.
The other 10% are the enemy of course.

Jesus Christ is Lord #fundie godlikeproductions.com

Satan has been working behind the scenes to Destroy Humans since the Beginning in the Garden of Eden.

Today Satan is using the Government, Corporations, Schools, Media as well as Religious and Secular Cults to Attack and Destroy

Humans and the Earth that supports all life.
His Methods of Destruction include Physical, Moral(Mental) and Spiritual attacks on Individuals, Families, Communities, Nations

and the whole World.
Many of these Attacks at the Individual and Family level could be stopped by simply recognizing them and avoiding them.
Attacks that destroy through the corruption of Air, Water and Land require Political Change.

Physical Weapons of Destruction
(P1)Radiation:(Fukashima, Depleted Uranium Weapons, Nuke Power, Cell, Wifi, TV/Radio, Microwave)
(P2)Abortions: Child Sacrifice by M.D., Birth Control Pills , Morning after Pills
(P3)High Fructose Corn Syrup:GMO, Immune Suppressor, Mineral Depletion, Feeds Yeast,Mold,Bacteria
(P4)Refined Sugar:Immune Suppressor, Mineral Depletion, Feeds Yeast,Mold,Bacteria
(P5)GMO:Causes Cancer, Infertility and destroys the Colon, found in verities of Wheat, Corn, Soy, Canola, Cotton, Sugar Beats, Potato and squash.
(P6)Fluoride: Nerve toxin, Cancer cause, often banned as a pesticide (because it is too dangerous)
(P7)Aspartame - NutraSweet / Splenda - sucralose(Numerous health problems too many to list)
(P8)Antibiotics/Antibacterial Cleaners (Kill off good bacteria leaving prime conditions for Yeast, Bacteria and Mold Growth)
(P9)Rx Drugs / Big Pharma Industrial Complex (mask symptoms, poison the body making more new disease)
(P10)Processed Foods - Low in Nutrition, High in Chemicals often contain GMO's and Chemicals
(P11)BPA Hormone Disruptor
(P12)MSG Nural Toxin added to food as taste enhancer
(P13)Propylene glycol Put in Food and some medications
(P14)Chemtrails (toxic spray from NWO Airplanes)
(P15)Vaccines (biological Weapons causing huge list of problems including Death)
(P16)Food Dyes
(P17)Makeup
(P18)Perfumes/Colones
(P19)Antiperspirant - Aluminum compounds - breast cancer
(P20)Baking Powder - Aluminum
(P21)Sunscreens/Lotions - Chemicals
(P22)Soaps/Cleaners
(P23)Alcohol
(P24)Tobacco / E-Cigarettes
(P25)Illegal Drugs

Moral(Mental)Weapons of Destruction
(M1)WAR - Military Industrial Complex (Gov Promoting Division and Hatred to induce Killing and other Crimes)
(M2)Addictions (TV, Internet Surfing, Social Media, Video Games, Sports, Porn, drugs)
(M3)Gangs (Culture of Death)
(M4)Racism (Teaching/Preaching Hatred because of Physical, Moral, Cultural, Spiritual Differences)
(M5)False Flags (mass murders blamed on innocent parties using controlled Media)
(M6)STRESS Increased Levels (doom on every day)
(M7)Political Process Failures (Failure of Justice System and no Redress of grievances)


Spiritual Weapons of Destruction

By attacking God, The Word of God and the Doctrines of God Satan has sought to pull people away from the Truth and get them to

believe in Lies.

Rebuke the LIES of Satan Using The Word of God
Word of God = King James Bible

Rebuke the LIES of Satan Using the Truth, The Word of God.
Lie - Scripture exposing/rebuking lie
-------------------------------------
(S1)There is NO GOD. - Isaiah 45:21-23
(S2)The Big Bang theory. - Genesis 01:31 - 2:01
(S3)Darwin’s Theory of Evolution. - Genesis 01:27, Romans 1:20
(S4)Aliens exist from other worlds. - Acts 17:22-32, Acts 19:35
(S5)There is no life after Death. - John 05:29, Mat 27:53
(S6)There is no Hell or Heaven. - Luke 16:23, Acts 1:11
(S7)It is Good for people to Tolerate Sin. - Romans 01:18-02:29, Luke 17:29
(S8)Abortion is not murder. - Exodus 21:22-23
(S9)Fornication and Adultery are O.K. - John 8:3-8:11
(S10)Pornography is not the same as Adultery, and harms nobody. - Matthew 05:27-5:29, 2 Peter 2:14
(S11)We can’t trust God’s Word because we don’t really know what it is. - Psalm 12:06, Matthew 24:35, 2 Corinthians 11:3-4
(S12)If we can’t trust in God, then we must trust ourselves as God instead. - Genesis 03:04-05, Romans 05:01, Romans 10:02-04


====================================================

(P2)Abortions - USA Child Sacrifice/Murders (Genocide of the Unborn)
as of July 28, 2014 www.numberofabortions.com
(USA since 1973=57Million) (World since 1980 1.34 Trillion)

[link to www.humanlife.org]
The Pill is used by about 14,000,000 American women each year and 60,000,000 internationally. Thus, even an infinitesimally low portion (say one-hundredth of one percent) of 780 million Pill cycles per year globally could represent tens of thousands of unborn children lost to this form of chemical abortion annually. How many young lives have to be jeopardized for prolife believers to question the ethics of using the Pill? This is an issue with profound moral implications for those believing we are called to protect the lives of children.

After the Pill had been on the market fifteen years, many serious negative side effects of estrogen had been clearly proven. These included blurred vision, nausea, cramping, irregular menstrual bleeding, headaches, increased incidence of breast cancer, strokes, and heart attacks, some of which led to fatalities.

Britler #racist stormfront.org

Race defiler / mongrel breeder factsheet

1) Race defilers commit crimes against humanity
The race traitor typically produces mongrolized offspring with a non-white partner. This undoes thousands of years of evolution and is a serious crime against humanity and life itself. The offspring typically dwell in the host nation and aids population replacement of the national community. The offspring must themselves reproduce and the bloodlines are diluted for generations to come.

2) Race defilers are a menace to society
Interracial breeders not only commit genetic suicide themselves they bring into being a new sub race of human with no homogeneous hereditary.

3) Race defilers are anti-social
Race defilers are typically oblivious to their immorality due to ignorance, poor education, low standards of upbringing, etc. They cannot be patriotic and are of no real use to their homeland but are rather a danger.

4) The white partner is the criminal and society is the victim
The none-white partner is less guilty than the white partner since it is only natural to want to improve the DNA of ones offspring through mating with superior genetic stock. It can only be viewed as criminal to want to mate with significantly inferior genetic stock even though perhaps due to insanity.

5) Race defilers are criminals and are not treated as such
The perpetrators are criminal and in post war era society they are not punished with fines or imprisonment.

6) Race defilers are a threat to their homeland
Interracial breeding is a national security threat since it aids population replacement.

7) Race defilers are deficient in honor and loyalty
8) Race defilers have less no control over their base instincts
9) Race defilers can be more vulnerable to left wing media indoctrination
10) Race defilers are quislings who may tend to have genuine hatred for their own country
Britler is offline

MarquisDePaid #racist reddit.com

In current culture in the past 10 years especially there is an unfortunate trend of Jewish anti European racism.
In Ukraine antisemitic hate crimes have soared, and the Jewish elites are indeed, confirmed, helping to cover it up because they hate the strong European country of Russia.
In France, many Jews are subjected to horrile hate crimes which are ignored, because the leaders hate the idea of strong europeans. The leaders have other "more important" concerns with anti European political maneuvers and this bullshit hate is victimizing both Europeans and non-elite Jews.
If you are a Jew who denies this elitist problem exists then you are supporting their hate and your bullshit faggoty opinion is irrelevant. I definitely don't hate all Jews but I hate the bullshit Jewish elitism is doing, they are piece of shit human beings and I WILL call them out.

wxhluyp #transphobia #crackpot reddit.com

(This is a guy who thinks that everyone who wishes they were the opposite gender or has fantasies of being the opposite gender secretly have a fetish he’s came up with in his head.)

Quite unexpectedly nuanced, but still uninformed. From the title of the article, what should be understood is that this "sissy" fetish (and likely all meaningful non-dragqueen crossdressing) is actually a masochistic emasculation fetish. That it is possibly the most common masochistic fetish in males. That for the small proportion who develop profound emotional attachments related to their fetishism (especially if it is related to self identity), then these appear to make up the bulk of M2F transgender population.

It also goes without say, that while most masochistic emasculation fetishists are otherwise pretty regular guys, there is the possibility for some that substantial femininity/homosexual feelings figured in the initial emasculation anxieties/trauma which result in the fetish in the first place.

Mactrip100 & Thalanox #sexist youtube.com

(Mactrip100)

A lifetime of watching colleagues and friends - many of them wimmin, hasn’t taught me anything different, never, ever, be a house husband or soy-boy.

What women say they want, and what they actually want, is very, very different. When female friends or colleagues admit to me their feelings about their husbands, and start with ‘he’s a good man, but...’ I know what’s coming next...🤦‍♂️

By the way, I read Paglia two decades ago and she’s absolutely right and that’s why she is now a pariah to feminists, and has never been invited back to speak on the BBC, after walking out of an interview calling Dimbleby a popinjay - she takes no prisoners.
I’ve something to ad to her famous quote, ‘... if women were in charge of civilisation, we’d be living in mud huts, BUT - we would be sitting on lovely decorative cushions...’ 😬

(Thalanox)

There are plenty of relationships where a man is a house husband and it works just fine

Have you heard of the phrase "The exception that proves the rule"?
How about this: If I were to say "Men are taller than women", would you tell me I was a liar because there are SOME women who are taller than SOME men? No, you wouldn't. The exceptional situations, because they are rare, prove the general rule.

yet there's plenty of relationships where the house husband wife works relationship works in fact this story would be the exception

What is the ratio of the number of house husband / wife works relationships compared to the more traditional arrangements?
There are reasons you have to be careful about understanding whether you have a representative sample to work from. I do not think you have a representative sample, because the model of relationship you're characterizing as being normal and standard isn't.

how is it not normal for a man to be a house husband it's not the 1950s women work many of these relationships work just fine with the man being a stay-at-home parent this woman's story is only the exception to the general rule that these relationships work

Women have been selected over an evolutionary time scale to be attracted to men who will dominate and protect her.

Human instincts are programmed for men having harems of women, and waging tribal warfare against other tribes to kill all of their men and take their women as prizes. It'll take a lot more time than fifty years to undo all of that programming.

Hell, even modern first world civilization is something that only a small minority of humans on the planet can function in, let alone build and maintain on their own.

Tabula Rasa (the blank slate theory of human psychology) is a lie. Stop believing it.

A man being the breadwinner and the woman being the homemaker has been the historical standard since time immemorial for a reason.

Atavistic Autist #psycho #quack #ableism #transphobia incels.co

[Serious] Bring back the anachronistic diagnosis of "autistic psychopathy"

Us autistic celibates need every status halo that we can get, and I posit that if we are properly understood as being psychopathic again, rather than effeminate soys who "stim" to consumer trinkets by jumping up and down (or even worse: trannies who cut off our own dicks), then people will fear us and thus respect us, and foids will naturally fuck us.

We must stop the mental health establishment, as guided by the desires of the preening mothers of autistic children, from promoting the myth that "autistic men are no more likely to commit crimes than neurotypical men, and are even less likely to commit them." This stigmatizes us as high-inhib pussies who are not even good enough for betabuxxing. Because anybody who lives an autistic life and does not give thought to crime must therefore be a masochistic slave worthy only of contempt, and if it's said that this is true of most autists, then we are consequently degraded as a whole in the popular consciousness.

The related myth that "there are just as many autistic women as autistic men" must also be stopped for similar reasons.


This is our culture:

image


Executing one's mother and then going lone wolf is what it means to be autistic; not becoming a eunuch tranny, nor stimming to Star Wars action figures or anime figurines. And don't forget it, normgroids!

Julie Lévesque #conspiracy globalresearch.ca

During the recent measles outbreak, the mainstream media blamed the epidemic solely on non vaccinated children, even though people who were vaccinated caught the disease and some vaccines have proven to be inefficient in the past. Without the slightest nuance, the mainstream media constantly portrays people reluctant to accept just any vaccine as “anti-vaxers”, irresponsible and misinformed people, relying on irrational fears and the one and only “fraudulent” Andrew Wakefield study linking autism to vaccines. (Watch Lina B. Moreco’s documentary Shots in the Dark, which features Dr. Wakefield and thankful parents of his young patients with autism.)

In reality, many so-called “anti-vaxers” are not ALL totally against vaccines. While some people may be totally against any kind of vaccination, many, including doctors and health specialists, question certain vaccines, ingredients in the vaccines and/or the vaccination schedule. This is not based on a survey but on my own perception resulting from the fair amount of articles on vaccines and the pharmaceutical industry that I’ve read over the last five years as a journalist. There are a large number of doctors and health specialists who have done truly independent research and who criticize vaccination based on scientific studies and solid evidence.

Why is the media so keen on portraying Big Pharma critics as crazy, uneducated, unscientific and irresponsible people?

Ann Barnhardt #fundie barnhardt.biz

In my video in which I burned the Koran, I bookmarked the various pages with strips of raw bacon. Why did I do this? Is it because I actually believed that I was thumbing my nose at a non-existent pagan moon deity? Nope. People, there is NO SUCH THING AS “ALLAH”, so therefore what sense would it make for me to “offend” or “bait” a non-existent entity?

And a book is just a book. The paper is made out of tree cellulose and the ink is made out of petroleum and probably some sort of soy derivative. The bacon itself was composed of muscle tissue, fat tissue and connective tissue. The components of these tissues are water, protein, fatty acids and collagen. Break it down further and we’re talking carbon, hydrogen, oxygen and nitrogen in various configurations. Touching a piece of bacon, or any piece of pork or pigskin to a book does not result in anything except making a bit of a greasy mess of the book. No pagan moon deity is roused from slumber and filled with murderous wrath. Do you know why? Because THERE IS NO PAGAN MOON DEITY.

So why did I bookmark my koran with bacon? Because it was WITTY. Because it pointed up the absurdity of the West’s groveling before musloid superstitions – specifically the U.S. Military’s rules and protocol for handling korans, namely handling with the right hand only, and preferably with the hand or hands gloved.

Yeah, because the people who actually use toilet paper and DON’T wipe their butts with their bare left hands are the ones with the “dirty hands”. You betcha, General Petraeus.

[...]

Christ, on the other hand, is Real. Not only is He real, but He was there, in the septic tank with Thomas Vander Woude. Christ knows all about diving into tanks of shit, because that is exactly what He did for us. He was literally born in shit, in a cave that acted as a shelter for livestock. The floors were covered in shit, as were the walls. Don’t think that wasn’t symbolic and carefully planned by Him. You don’t think He could have worked it out so that there was one room left at the inn? Sure He could have – but He specifically chose the shit. He chose the shit because humanity fell into the septic tank, and we are all, every single one of us, drowning in our own shit. We just call it “sin”. The funny thing is, most of us don’t feel Jesus underneath us, holding us up. It just feels like we are standing on a solid base. You know why? Because like Thomas Vander Woude, Our Blessed Lord isn’t struggling. He isn’t squirming or flailing as He sucks our shit into his lungs. He’s just down there, supporting us, holding us up, drowning in our shit, with more solidity than the foundations of the earth, so that we can have life. I reckon the challenge in day-to-day life is to never delude one’s self into thinking that we are standing on the bottom of the tank and holding ourselves up. We aren’t. That’s Our Blessed Lord down there, whether or not we perceive it, or even believe it.

Remember this the next time you hear some musloid waxing philosophical on ritually clean death and admission criteria to “allah’s paradise”. And don’t belittle Christ, His Incarnation and His Sacrifice by encouraging such stupidity of thought. The fates of men’s souls aren’t trivia, and it sure as heck isn’t a game of tag played with pork products. Shooting someone with a pork-coated bullet doesn’t make you the judge of mankind, determining who goes to hell and who doesn’t. That task belongs to Christ and Christ alone, since it is Christ and Christ alone who has willingly drowned in the shit of every human being. And for that we should feel nothing but gratitude.

CH #fundie heartiste.wordpress.com

Bolded emphasis mine. Male dominance is the yang to female submissiveness. And male dominance hierarchies are a natural and healthy self-organizing behavior among young and old men. Hierarchies keep the peace and enable male cooperation for the greater good. Women and male shitlibs of womanly disposition don’t understand this inherent property of manhood because the former don’t compete to establish useful hierarchies and the latter are always on the bottom of male hierarchies and so seek to destroy them and the need for them.

...

Victimhood culture is the outgrowth of a feminizing (and feministing) nation. As our institutions have caved to the deluge of the Great Menstruation, boys have been severed from their innate biological predispositions, with no outlet of expressing their inborn male-ness. The result has been a massive retreat of boys from school and of men from public life, and a terrible overrun of our institutions by women, particularly women who harbor deep wells of spiteful man-hatred.

...

[Right here he's talking about bullying crackdowns restricting schoolyard fighting]

Great insight. The protection of the feminized State protects the tyrants from their deserved humblings at the hands of boys who are proud to be boys and not some twisted tranny genderfluid simulacrum of a male-thing. We’ve created a real monster in our zeal to defeat an imaginary monster.

...

This aligns with Jon Haidt’s moral foundations research which uncovered that liberals stress fairness and harm in their moral calculations, while conservatives place equal emphasis on all six moral dimensions (fairness, harm, liberty, authority, purity, and loyalty). What this means is that shitlibs are constricted in their world views, seeing all violence as against their notions of harm-based morality, instead of having the more nuanced moral view of conservatives who better understand that some violence is necessary to preserve societal health.

...

Social norms exist for a reason, even if liberaltardians don’t have the mental capacity to see those reasons beyond “Ugh, stop harshing my buttplug mellow, man!”. As we add more Diversity, we add more competing norms, and we take away more of the national cohesion that makes America a real country and not a bus depot for international frugalists and their buffer zone third world pets.

...

Liberals may be slightly better than conservatives on tests of abstraction, but I’ve normally found that conservatives are much better “big picture” thinkers than are liberals who are hidebound by their pinched individualistic morality to focus exclusively on short-term affronts to their lifestyles.

...

Conservatives rely more on their gut instinct, which is why they tend to lose media-framed sophistic shitlib “debates”, but also why they are smarter about foreseeing the downstream effects of social policies favored by liberals.

...

A rootless nation substitutes one form of social pressure — family and neighbors — with another form that accommodates the atomized existence — pressure from fake news media, entertainment, social media, and BIGCORP. It’s a malignant trade-off in the long run.

Diversity™ of course exacerbates rootlessness and the problems that come from population churn. White people constantly fleeing encroaching Diversity can turn an entire nation into a rootless mob of psychologically frayed zombies doped up on SSRIs and opioids.

It’s not a shock to learn that almost all the school shooters were taking anti-anxiety drugs. Cause and effect are hard to disentangle — it probably goes both ways in a vicious feedback loop of degenerating evil: rootlessness brings on the anxiety which is prescribed BIGPHARMA drugs which with chronic use mentally destabilizes the user and makes him more susceptible to the problems arising from rootlessness and social isolation.

We’ve got a long way to go to make America great again. Trump was only the opening salvo.

churl #fundie achristianthing.wordpress.com

The term “brony” describes a male (often adult) fan of the recent TV childrens’ series My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic. When I first heard about brony culture, I was just a little unsettled. Men of my generation have trouble growing up – much to the chagrin of many eligible women I know who have suffered at the hands of their prolonged adolescence – and to me this sounded like another instance of immature infantilism; I won’t exactly say that I was ready to pull a Mark Driscoll and tell them to “man-up,” but I will say that it made me wish there were more sensible guys around, if not for my eligible women friends, at least for the dignity of our sex. I may not have been ready to tell such men to man up, but I could at least insist that they grow up. To a certain degree, I still think this. But I have come to see that the actual process of growing up may be more complicated than I initially thought. Perhaps growing up is not simply a matter of becoming serious. Perhaps it is also a matter of becoming (as George MacDonald famously put it), not childish, but childlike.

You see, while I would not call myself a “brony” per se, My Little Pony happens to be my five year old son’s favorite show. As most parents will know, this means I have been witness to almost all the episodes multiple times. And the conclusion I have come to is that, at bottom, what appeals to a certain kind of male about the show is its representation of the kind of story we no longer tell. By this, I mean the fairy tale that does in fact entertain some idea of innocence.

In modern culture, we love fairy tales, but we always insist on digging up in them very dark twists and sub-themes. Almost all of them (we presume from psychoanalytic theory) are about sex. Hansel and Gretel must be witch hunters. That Prince Charming cannot be the protagonist has become something of a modern cliché. Snow white becomes a sexualized vampire figure. Etc. I do not mean of course to say that we should have no revisionist fairy tales; in my opinion, the recent Snow White and the Huntsman film did quite a good job of adapting the tale. But it is perhaps tragic when a film like Shrek – that was so humorous to us who were brought up on the original stories – can no longer be understood in a generation that no longer has these stories. Irony and complexity can only work when the basic building blocks are grasped, and we seem unable or unwilling to pass these on to our children. All we can see are the sarcastic adult versions, and even when we encounter an original, we still think that it masks something far more sinister than its literal vehicle suggests.

What I want to suggest, though, is that there is in us not only a deep desire and need for complexity, nuance and treatment of a sinister reality; there is also in us the desire for something beautiful, something innocent – older writers would call this an Edenic impulse. And what I want to suggest is that My Little Pony is popular among males precisely because they have no other cultural referent pointing them back to a certain kind of fairy-tale innocence that they were created to need.

The reason the show does this so well, I suggest, is because it is pagan in the best possible sense – it is a classical pagan story. I am not here using the word pagan pejoratively, but rather descriptively. As in classical philosophy, friendship in the series is one of the highest goods. The ideals – the seven elements of harmony that figure prominently in the show – are reminiscent of the classical cardinal virtues, with a nod to the theological virtues thrown in via the number seven. There are composite beasts that look like they could come from a classical or medieval bestiary, and dragons are penalized for their hoarding capacities. There is even a nod to the classical grammarian in us all, that insists on pluralizing “pegasus” as “pegasi” (this, by the way, is a far greater “take-home-message” than the ones I see on most childrens’ shows).

Considered all together, these elements make for a show that, in an imaginative desert, stands out as a mythopoeic beacon. It is sad, of course, that we are not at a historical point where children are being fascinated by the really great mythopoeic stories – the ones that held the likes of Lewis, Chesterton, Tolkien, and MacDonald in their thrall. Nonetheless, we must work with what we are given, and even if My Little Pony will not exactly outlast the Grimm brothers, it is a significant pointer in our culture back to the childlikeness for which my generation – and particularly the males of my generation – are starved. At least, culturally speaking, there is still some kind of space wherein girls can appreciate real mythopoeic innocence (or at least I feel it may be easier – but am willing to be corrected); in male culture, though, such innocence appears as “girly” against the backdrop of a hyper-violence channeling all the ferocity of past epics with none of the wisdom or the reasons these epics provide for fighting.

I think when we understand this we may be able to evaluate so-called brony culture in a different light. Rather than understanding it as a stunt or stutter in the “serious” development of an adult, perhaps instead we should understand it as a transitional space in culture for those on their way to becoming childlike. And such childlikeness is to be by all means encouraged, for it in fact involves a maturity and wisdom beyond the stiff and unimaginative thing we think of as adulthood. As T. S. Eliot liked to remind us (channeling I think Heraclitus), “the way up is the way down,” and perhaps we will find this true of the young men that we simply want to “man up”; maybe the problem is not that they have become children, but that they have not become children enough.

Anonymous Coward #conspiracy godlikeproductions.com

Ebola Vaccine - We are from the Government and are here to help!

some things to keep in mind when the CDC and Gov tell you, You must take the Ebola Vaccine......

Vaccines are Promoted Junk Science Like Tobacco and Root Canals/Caps and Mercury Fillings that Kill and make ill many more people than they help. If the Government says they have a vaccine to keep you from getting Ebola;
point out that The Chicken Pox Vaccine has not worked since people who have gotten it can and have gotten Chicken Pox / Shingles later in life. If the Vaccine WAS effective then they have nothing to fear from the un-vaccinated.

People who have "taken" the Polio Vaccine have been paralyzed or suffered partial Paralysis.

RE: CDC“We are losing the battle on convincing people to get vaccines through science and facts."

That is because Science and Facts do not Support Vaccines.

Some vaccines may provide short Term immunity against a small specific number of specific Viruses, But All Vaccines Weaken the Immune system by bypassing normal Exposure methods through the Lungs or GI Track.

All Vaccines have Risks that may include Allergic Reaction, Immune system degradation or Over stimulation resulting in Illness or Allergies.

When DNA is used such as Human Embryos, or Animal Tissue to grow the Viruses on, it can cause the Immune system to attack the Body as segments of the Foreign DNA may be similar enough to be targeted in the vaccinated person.
God never intended DNA to be injected into the bloodstream.

Additives to vaccines such as Mercury, Oils, MSG, Unknown and unintended Viruses etc. etc. etc. can have serious side effects including Death, SIDS, Brain Damage....

The Latest type of Flu Vaccines are GMO grown with/on Insect DNA. They are Altering peoples DNA and Immune system with these Bio-Weapons they call Vaccines.

The Stress, and Fake Foods full of chemicals and Toxins are weakening peoples ability to resist disease, along with radiation like Cell/WiFi/Microwaves/Radio etc.....
as a Ebola that looks engineered to Kill, like it came out of a Lab is spreading throughout the world.

21 day incubation period for new Ebola strain, last 3 days with symptoms followed by quick death usually.

If the Government Did not Want US to die in the Coming Engineered Pandemic of Ebola, they would not allow the attack on American Immune systems by their Endorsement of the following.

Government approved/promoted WEAPONS used against People
1. Radiation (Cell, WiFi, Nuclear Fukashima, D.U. Weapons)
2. Fluoride
3. BPA
4. MSG
5. GMO (Wheat, Corn, Soy, Cotton seed oil, Canola, Sugar Beets)
6. Hydrogenated Oils
7. Chemtrails
8. Vaccines
9. Aspartame
10. Refined Sugar
11. High Fructose Corn Syrup
12. Big Pharma Industrial Complex
13. Abortions (The Birth Control Pill, Morning After)
14. WAR/Drugs - Military Industrial Complex/CIA Drug Cartel
15. Obama Care (destroying full time jobs making them part time)
16. Addictions (Video Games, Sugar, Pop, Rx Drugs, ssri drugs)
17. Rx Prescription Drugs(Mask symptoms cause Disease)
18. Sterilization (GMO Foods, BPA, Fluoride, Vaccines)
19. False Flags (93 WTC, 9/11/2001, Oklahoma City Bombing)
20. Food Dyes
21. Laced Tobacco
22. E - Cigarettes Nicotine, some have Propylene glycol
23. Alcohol
24. Increase STRESS Levels (bio-weapons labs incompetence)
25. Antiperspirant - aluminum compounds - breast cancer
26. Processed Foods (Microwave Ovens cause Cell Protein Destruction)

Mike King #conspiracy realhistorychannel.org

Advanced students of both Q Anon and Trump himself all understand that both parties speak in cryptic, or coded language. The late-night commie comics have really enjoyed themselves by poking fun at all Trump’s blatant twitter “typos” as well as many of the strange things that he has said over the past three years. But, with the grace of God, the last laugh will be on these fork-tongued sons-of-bitches, and hopefully soon too.

Over the past few days, the Piranha Press seems to be impressed by the President’s new somber and serious tone regarding a virus “crisis” which Trump surely knows is essentially little more than the annual flu (if that!). Based upon Trump’s new “gravitas” ™ and increased death expectation, the Fake News is now more confident than ever of a protracted economic shutdown and an election year Depression. (((They))) now think, based on Trump’s own words, that they’ve got him trapped in their box. Maybe not.

image
image
image
1 . Trump has been ridiculed for spelling "smoking" as "smocking" -- but the coded message refers to "smocking parties" in which elite Satanic sex perverts such as Hillary campaign manager John Podesta and Obama handler Valerie Jarrett (above) mingle naked wearing just body paint. // 2 & 3. The smug and snarky CIA comedians had lots of fun with Trump's botched word "covfefe" (instead of "coverage") -- but Trump 's term had a hidden meaning.

The Trump quotes that have got Sulzberger’s Slimes giddy are contained in this article (and have been replayed widely all over the Fake News – From the article:

“I want every American to be prepared for the hard days that lie ahead. We’re going to go through a very tough two weeks.”

Afterward, he added:

“We’re going to start seeing some real light at the end of the tunnel. But this is going to be a very painful — very, very painful — two weeks.”

*** Quote not included in the article *** "When you look ... and see the kind of death that's been caused by this invisible enemy. ... This is going to be a rough two week period. --- We're going to see things get better, and it's going to be like a burst of light."

Hmmm. Trump is sounding every bit as alarmist as Bill Gates now -- only with a rosy optimistic ending. Let’s analyze.

Trump: We’re going to go through a very tough two weeks. // very, very painful two weeks // rough two weeks.

Analysis: Could that be alluding to imminent mass arrests and Q Anon’s promise of a glorious “Patriots Day” (April 19th)? It would certainly fit.

Trump: We’re going to start seeing some real light at the end of the tunnel // burst of light.

Analysis: One of Q Anon’s oft-repeated slogans is “Dark-to-Light.” Q has posted this phrase so often that some of the enterprising Q Marketeers sell “swag” items emblazoned with this phrase which refers to “The Great Awakening” of a public that is to be led out of darkness and into light.

Trump: “This is going to be a very painful — very, very painful — two weeks.”

Analysis: “Pain” is another of Q’s signature slogans – which the meme-makers and marketeers have also seized upon. The term refers to the “pain” that is to be unleashed upon the Deep Staters and Satanists.

To recap the ominous de-coded parallels:

Q

Patriots’ Day (April 19)
Dark to Light
Pain

Trump

Very tough two weeks (now to April 19th)
Light at the end of tunnel // Burst of light
Very painful — very, very painful.

And finally, there are those two massive hospital (or prison?) ships – the USNS Comfort and the USNS Mercy – docked, respectively off the coasts of the Deep State rat nests of New York and Los Angeles. Both ships have three red “plus sign” crosses painted across their hulls. Those crosses match up nicely with yet another one of Q Anon’s repeated signature moves the “+” and also an occasional “+++.”

The images below say it better than we can describe it. We are either on the cusp of an historic event – a knockout blow against the New World Order – that will be written and talked about centuries from now --- or, a deflating and inexplicable disappointment suffered at the hands of Trump.

One thing is for certain – something BIG has got to give and soon. Stay tuned.

Boobus Americanus 1: I read in the New York Times today that Trump is saying that the next two weeks will be very, very painful.
Boobus Americanus 2: Yes. But he also said that there is light at the end of the tunnel.

*

St. Sugar: Patriots Day! -- Dark to light! -- Now comes the pain!
Editor: With ships bound for Guantanamo Bay prison, perhaps? -- The suspense is killing me.

Various Incels #sexist #pedo incels.co

(Llama)

[SuicideFuel] Average teenage chad life

image

i was on some social media and a chad i have added posted this. This guy is in HIGH SCHOOL. Thats right, you resd that right, HIGH SCHOOL. While you were at home rotting and playing video games in high school chad was LITERALLY HAVING GIRLS BEG TO HAVE SEX WITH HIM. Incredibly over.

Brutal tbh, I can barely understand what they’re saying.

Hit it means have sex, she is begging to have sex with him

You fuckin idiot,you fuckin masochist cuck.
Why are you using any sort of social media or add Chads ?
You deserve getting your blood boiled with anger and dying ıf you use non-art/porn/meme only social media

You sound angry at me. You should be angry at chad.

(Robtical)

But but, teen foids can't consent and aren't ready for sex. :soy:

Even kindergardeners can consent to things. They just don’t always know whats best for them. But men do and men have married off their young daughters to eachother for as long as patriarchy has existed among humans. It’s a few thousand years. Paleolithic humans were like mandrills.

Not even adults know what's best for them. Teen foids will be better at choosing a mate because most likely they're less picky than adult chad chasing whores.

soy if you dont think they're ready by 10. even boys are having sex at 10 when they start puberty after females

Soy if you care about the age when they're ready.

(nihilisticelist)

Imagine having girls literally begging for your dick because you're good looking. Being able to just snap a quick selfie and get on Tinder and have girls hitting you up for sex. Life is just a pussy buffet if you're good looking enough.

(SuperMario64DS)

Genocidefuel.

What a crazy bitch
"I need to have sex with you or ill kill myself"

God help the kids she has.

(FemoidsGTFO)

We need to euthanize all teenage foids. They're degenerates. Every single one of them. AWALT.

Colvin76 #sexist #crackpot incels.co

[Blackpill] [Hard To Swallow Edition] If you are still a KHHV after high school & after turning 18, you will never ascend.

You are delusional as fuck if you think otherwise. High school is the "easiest" time to ascend for many reasons. Foids have less access to chads and still live at home.

My high school has 500-550 students per grade.
Divide that in half and you get the foid students, so 250-275. School time is 7 hours a day, 5 days a week, and approximately 180 days per year. Some of you many not have 500 students per grade. Maybe you only had 250 to 400s but my point still stands.

Imagine being around foids for this much time, in a less hypergamous setting, no tinder, and still not getting laid. What the fuck do you think is going to happen when I get to college or the work force? Adult 18+ foids have unlimited access to Chads on tinder, instagram, college/uni or work. Why would they choose a sub8 male like me?

*Brutal TeenLovePill incoming*:
being a virgin after high school or after 18 = missing Teen Love.
IF YOU MISSED OUT ON TEEN LOVE, IT NEVER EVEN BEGAN FOR YOU AND HERE'S WHY.

Teen love is a crucial point of development for being able to have a decent sex life and being socially accepted into society. This is when kissing, handholding, and sex happen. If you can't get these by 18, You are EXTREMELY FAR BEHIND SOCIALLY AND SEXUALLY. It its COMPLETELY OVER FOR YOU and saying anything else is DELUSIONAL COPE. Missing teen love means you are genetic dead-end subhuman trash. No way around it.

***Reminder that by the time HS ends, most of your normalfaggot peers have already either had sex, kisses, flirting, partying, dating, or other specific degenerate encounters/acts with the opposite sex.

How the fuck am I going to catch up? I can't. You can't either unless you are a fakecel faggot larper.

The only hope for 18+ virgins is if he were somehow a good looking tall mentalcel and foids looked past his non-existent experience. Besides that RARE EXCEPTION, it doesn't make sense how an 18+ Kissless Handholdless Virgin could ascend otherwise. Think about how creeped out foids get when thinking about average/ugly adult virgins.

(Cope): INB4 copers saying: :soy::soy::soy: "But we had 18 year olds and older on the forum ascend. Stop being so negative you're hurting my feelings with blackpills!!!" :soy::soy::soy:

Retards need to stop chugging soy and know that the exception is not the rule. 99% of us are going to rot here forever and there is nothing that can be changed about it.

If you can't ascend in high school or before 18, YOU WILL NEVER ASCEND PERIOD. You are doomed to Inceldom for life. GET OUT OF YOUR FANTASY LAND AND STOP BEING FUCKING DELUSIONAL.

Atavistic Autist #sexist #racist #crackpot incels.co

[Theory] Feminists hate male allies because they remind them of their effete fathers

Just like their fathers had a claim of authority over them yet were weak and allowed them become whores, soys similarly have a paternalistic attitude towards women, yet are weak and cannot enforce it. Foids therefore enjoy cucking soys with psychopathic Chads as a form of revenge against the fathers they resent for not adequately protecting/controlling them.

The same concept applies to Black Lives Matter and its White allies, who nogs hate because they are preening White supremacists on the inside and yet meek on the outside, so nogs derive special enjoyment from humiliating them.

Zaetheus #fundie incels.co

I wish “The Purge” was real.

Legally for 24 hours all crime would be legal. All the people who made me suffer would pay. I could shoot numales/cucks in their soy filled bathtubs, and slit roastie throats with barbed wire dipped in lemon juice.If ERing would actually be legal it would actually solve most of our problems. Virgin? Take a femoid by force.LTR? Chain her to the walls in the basement. Chad? Dismember his manhood to prevent his seed from spreading. Roasties? Lock them in a secluded room, deprive them of food and water. Forcing them to lick the sweat from my balls as sustenance.

Sockerpiller #sexist reddit.com

Re: a l p h a w i d o w

image

Imagine being such a privileged retard that you can boast about fucking a 0,1 percentile guy and still claim you are ”””femcel”””. I have no sympathy for these idiots. If they were born men they would have something to feel shit about.

Being a femcel is like being born a white man in 1800s America and complain that your slaves don’t actually want to be owned by you. It’s a non-issue and they try to play the victim to feel better about themselves when they fucking know they could easily solve their ”””problems”””. Thing is, they fon’t actually have to self improve, just lower their standards. UNLIKE US.

Probably LARP to trigger us but wouldnt be surprised if it was true

why we would triggered to this.
this is entire shit we all want to point out.

I think many of us here (and people in general) derive some enjoyment out of being disillusioned, even when it is a superficially painful experience. I think many of us are addicts to pain and marginalization; we somewhat enjoy being victims, whether we admit it or not

Confusing IQ

People enjoy pain, they kind of indulge in it, even if it seems counterintuitive. We love looking at blackpills because it painfully confirms our ideas about the world. Maybe the logic is that if we own the pain, it can’t hurt us without our consent or catch us off guard.

Isn't that the whole point of the blackpill? If you disown the bluepill, you ready yourself for the truth, you accept reality and all the horrible shit it brings with it and cast away the illusion you, and the rest of the world has built up to guard/shield you from the shit reality of the real world. No sugarcoating, no virtue signalling, just the truth. The sooner you accept it, the sooner you know that your failures in life aren't only a result of your own actions. However this might make you indifferent and unmotivated since this basically means that you were disadvantaged from the start. It's a double edged sword which is very hard to wield correctly.

Ben Norton #moonbat bennorton.com

Alot of my work as a journalist has been dedicated to exposing the role of so-called “human rights” groups and “non-governmental organizations” (NGOs) as tools of US imperialism. But rarely is their status as an arm of Washington’s imperial power openly acknowledged.

That is what makes the follow remarks from blood-soaked war criminal Colin Powell so, well, explosive.

On October 26, 2001, top US military General Powell, who was then serving as secretary of state under the George W. Bush administration, gave a speech at the “National Foreign Policy Conference for Leaders of Nongovernmental Organizations,” held in the State Department.

This was well over a month after the 9/11 attacks, and the United States was already several weeks into its war on Afghanistan. The Bush administration was also setting the stage for its subsequent invasion of Iraq.

Powell gathered leaders of prominent NGOs in Washington to butter them up and emphasize the crucial supplementary role that they would be playing in the US government’s war efforts.

Powell heaped praise on NGOs that “shed light on human rights.” He noted that they were a key part of US military efforts, a “force multiplier” in Washington’s wars, and “such an important part of our combat team.”

Powell dispelled any pretense that American NGOs do work around the world in the interest of vague notions like “human rights.” Rather, he gloated, these NGOs serve the United States’ imperial interests, and it is in fact the illusion of their ostensible “independence” from the US government that is precisely what “makes [them] so valuable.”

[…]

Although he might be most well remembered for his infamous speech lying to the United Nations Security Council about non-existent “Weapons of Mass Destruction” in Iraq, never forget that Powell presided over the following atrocities:

the criminal US invasion of Panama, a blunt act of murderous neocolonialism, in which thousands of homes were burnt down and the bodies of civilians were shoveled into mass graves;

the first war on Iraq, the heinous Persian Gulf War, in which Washington intentionally bombed the country back to the stone age, devastating civilian infrastructure, even slaughtering fleeing Iraqi soldiers and Palestinian civilians on the abominable “Highway of Death”;

and the unspeakably criminal invasion and subsequent occupation of Iraq, in which more than 1 million Iraqis lost their lives, their country once again destroyed.

When Powell says purported “human rights” groups and other NGOs serve as “force multiplier” and “an important part of our combat team,” he means they help the US empire more effectively carry out blood-curdling war crimes like these.

All of this is only further confirmation that NGOs’ supposed support for “human rights” is just an imperial fig leaf to cover for Uncle Sam’s subjugation and exploitation of the planet.

Anonymous #conspiracy #wingnut #fundie i.redd.it

QANON GUIDE FOR NEWBIES

<table>

Who is Q? 01 Q is about 10 people in military intel & Trump admin.
What is Q’s purpose? 02 To awaken the population to the evil global cabal elite.
Why is this necessary? 03 The satanic cabal controls media, money. meds & minds.
When did Q start? 04 Q’s first post was 10.28.17. but plan started years ago.
Can Q be trusted? 05 You decide, Q posts keep coming true in the news.
Can Trump be trusted? 06 You decide. Trump’s policies all weaken the cabal
Can Military be trusted? 07 You decide. Marines are personally protecting Trump.
Can Media be trusted? 08 You decide. Media tells you what to THINK. Reconcile.
How does Q = Trump? 09 Q posts first. then Trump confirms with tweet ‘clues’.
What are the clues? 10 Typos & timing intervals of Trump tweets match Q posts.
Any other evidence? 11 Q predicts things only Trump would know. Over & over.
Who are LARP’s? 12 Bad actors in cabal hired to discredit Q posts & blind you.
Who are QAnons? 13 Patriots that research Q posts for evidence on the Chans.
What is QAnon.pub? 14 A safe place for newbies to read every new Q post.
What is Reddit? 15 Reddit has lots of Q boards with 50% real & 50% fake.
What is 4Chan? 16 Q started here. Not for newbies. Just above dark web.
What is 8Chan? 17 Q posts here now. QAnons only. Don’t visit. Need VPN.

Life, Human Life is from God #fundie godlikeproductions.com

Babies Lives Matter BLM

Things Not usually taught in Government Education Camps (public schools)

KJB Genesis 1:26-27 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.
So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

KJB Genesis 4:1 And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the LORD.

A Doctors Testimony-
At the end of a lecture in St. Louis, one of the doctors
present told me of a lady in good standing in
society and the church, who came to his office
and requested his services in producing abortion.
Her reason was that she had three children
and her husbands income was not sufficient to
support four children. He suggested that if
the presence of four children in the home
would lead to the death of the whole family
by starvation, that she return home and kill
one of the three. She was horrified at the
doctors suggestion that she murder one of the
children. The doctor explained that if she followed
his suggestion her health would be protected and
there would be but one guilty of murder, while,
if he followed her with, her health would be injured
and there would be two responsible for the
murder of her unborn child. But, Doctor,
she replied that would not be murder? I've not felt
it's movements. The Doctor explained to her how life
began at the moment of conception, how the little
embryo was as much a living human being as when it
has become strong enough to make it's movements known.
The true mother love triumphed and
she returned home and resolved to protect,
love, welcome and toil for four instead of three.

Medical Genocide approved of by World Governments under Satan's New World Order

Four Different Things:Abstinence, Conception Elimination, Conception Prevention, Birth Control

1)Abstinence - Not having Sex
2)Conception Elimination - Never having Intercourse
3)Conception Prevention - The rhythm method and/or Using Condoms or similar
4)Birth Control - Using a IUD, Chemical pill/drug to force abortion/menstruation

The Intrauterine Device IUD does not stop conception
The IUD does little or nothing to interfere with sperm migration or
fertilization (conception). It achieves its birth control effect primarily
by preventing the newly conceived human life from implanting in the uterine
lining (endometrium) and is thus an abortifacient.

The "Birth Control Pill" does not stop conception, it ends pregnancy by forcing menstruation through a Hormone induced Abortion.
The Hormones in the Pills are stronger than the ones that tell the body that the woman is pregnant, but the body still goes through partial transformations in the breast to provide milk to the Baby, that is why breast cancer rates go up in women with long term birth "control" pill use.

Many women on the "pill" have had many pill induced abortions and many partial transformations of their breast tissue.
Who knows how many forms of cancer are a result of hormones starting the Pregnancy Changes, and them having them abruptly end when the Menstruation pills take over and starts the woman's Period?

(P2)Abortions - USA Child Sacrifice/Murders (Genocide of the Unborn)as of July 28, 2014

www.numberofabortions.com
(USA since 1973=57Million) (World since 1980 1.34 Trillion)

[link to www.humanlife.org]
The Pill is used by about 14,000,000 American women each year and 60,000,000 internationally.

Thus, even an infinitesimally low portion (say one-hundredth of one percent) of 780 million Pill cycles per year globally could represent tens of thousands of unborn children lost to this form of chemical abortion annually. How many young lives have to be jeopardized for
prolife believers to question the ethics of using the Pill? This is an issue with profound moral implications for those believing we are called to protect the lives of children.

After the Pill had been on the market fifteen years, many serious negative side effects of estrogen had been clearly proven. These included blurred vision, nausea, cramping, irregular menstrual bleeding, headaches, increased incidence of breast cancer, strokes, and heart attacks, some of which led to fatalities.

Methods of Genocide Protected by the New World Order Government inside the United States of America.

the items below prove that Americans are being exterminated in a organized program of Genocide, protected and allowed
by their own "government"

Government approved/promoted WEAPONS used against People
-Abortion and Birth Control(physical and Chemical/drug induced Abortions)
-Rx Prescription Drugs, They rob the body of nutrients to detoxify from the drugs that suppress symptoms but actually create disease and new symptoms for witch Doctors will prescribe you MORE Rx Drugs. Drugs do not Cure Disease, they only treat (suppress) the symptoms and make you more Ill.
-Radiation (Cell, WiFi, Nuclear Fukashima, D.U. Weapons)
-GMO (Wheat, Corn, Soy, Cotton seed, Canola, Sugar Beets)
-Chemicals used on/in food, Pesticides/Herbicides/Preservatives/Dyes/Additives
-High Fructose Corn Syrup
-Refined Sugar
-Fried Foods/(Hydrogenated Oils) cause free radical damage and inflammation
-Aspartame and Sucrolose / NutraSweet and Splenda
-Alcohol consumption is a poison that like refined sugar suppresses the immune system and causes damage to the body.
-Fluoride plus other Chemicals and Drugs in the Water.
-BPA
-Chemtrails
-Vaccines
-Chemicals Cleaners, Flame Retardants, air fresheners.....
-Chemicals in Cosmetics and Perfumes
-WAR - Military Industrial Complex
-Laced Tobacco / E - Cigarettes
-Antiperspirant have aluminum compounds that increase breast cancer risk
-Processed Foods Micro Wave It so its really bad/destroyed
- Sunscreen, usually filled with Chemicals known to increase the risk of Cancer.
Sunscreen and covering the body in cloths all the time suppresses the Body in the production of Vitamin D, that is needed for countless essential body process to work properly.

Addictions (Cell Phones, T.V., Internet, Porn, Video Games, Sugar, Pop, Rx Drugs, ssri drugs)
============

Want to live?
Get Good Nutrition, Sleep in a natural/clean fresh dark room away from electromagnetic radiation, Exercise, Drink Clean Water, Detoxification and reducing Stress Cure the body of Disease (Dis-Ease).

Incel Wiki #sexist wiki.incels.info

Tanner

There is a tier between Melvin and Chad.

This tier is called Tanner. In the grand scheme, relatively speaking, Tanner functions as a Melvin if Chad is present, but Tanner does possess some unique traits.

Tanner is basically just a douche, kind of like some people think Chad is, but Chad isn't a douche, Chad is really funny and is just a genuine savage. Everyone loves Chad, even if it's just begrudgingly, unless they're insane and want to kill Chad out of envy. Okay back to Tanner. No one thinks Tanner is actually that funny. If they are laughing at his joke, it's because they overestimate his social clout and want to be adjacent to him to increase their own shit-tier standing. He isn't really popular, but he IS capable of making friends who aren't autistic and who do not interact with him initially only from things like dungeons and dragons.

Tanners can often be mistaken for Melvins, or a really, really third-rate Chad, but only by people who don't understand or at least recognize the many nuanced layers Chad operates on so effortlessly. (Sidenote: Chads don't necessarily have to understand their own behaviors completely in order to continue them or to be a Chad). Tanners also confuse people this way because they readily offer up their own resources, for example a Tanner will volunteer his parents' house for a high school party. In this scenario, Tanner hasn't actually brought anything to the table himself, especially not with his social skills (because they are poor - unlike Melvin's which don't exist at all). Tanner is attempting to buy social clout, likely thinking he can get laid with this method. He might, but he will not retain a truly valuable lady, an elusive Stacy, if he is even lucky enough to snag one for that fateful night. Many people besides Stacys and Chads will mistakenly believe having hard resources can make you a Chad. Chad is both a status, and a mindset, first and foremost. Hard resources are simply something that comes to Chads from their hard work ethic.

Tanners often do possess enough cleverness to recognize Chads. Tanners, because they are not completely oblivious to the repercussions of their mistakes like so many Melvins are, universally fear Chads. To be fair, it doesn't take a ton of cleverness to recognize Chad. Some Melvins can do it. The main motive for Tanners to identify Chads is to attempt to be adjacent to them, to swim in their wake so to speak. This nearly always ends poorly for them, because Chads can coexist with each other when in environments with plentiful Stacys, and with Chads in the picture, Tanner is basically invisible. Tanner will almost always end up with a Margaret in this scenario, but generally avoids Gertrudes as they think themselves too high ranking to stoop to Gertrude.

Through many years of efforts, poor quality as they are, Tanners can eventually develop a reasonable enough understanding of the power dynamics that surround them, if they didn't have that earlier in life. For this reason Tanners will attempt to occupy spaces that are vacant of Chads, to assume Chad's role and hope to fool those in that space. Stacys tend to instinctively know something is wrong, but while experiencing Chad-scarcity they find a way to rationalize temporarily stooping to a Tanner, especially if he or his parents have money.

Because Tanners do not possess the natural social skills, chiseled forms and sexual abilities that Chad does, it's only a matter of time before he slips up and Tanner's tactic of pretending to be a Chad blows up in his face. Tanner will likely go through a period of hard Melvining after the devastation of his one-sided bonding with a Stacy and then losing her.

Chad has total social dominance, and even if he's borderline retarded, he at least vaguely knows it. Margarets who cannot retain Chads and are aware of it may pretend to not be into Chads, and may seek out Tanners to try and pussy-whip into trophy boyfriends to present as a Chad, that may fool other, less experienced Margarets and Gertrudes. Stacys will always figure out Tanner isn't Chad in the end though, but then again Stacy doesn't like lowering herself to hang out much with Margaret and Gertrude in the first place.

Although inconsequential, Tanners may be identified by Chads as non-Melvins, but also as non-Chads. That's why it's inconsequential. Chads treat Tanners as Melvins because relatively speaking, with Chad around, they are. Tanners are generally competent enough to get degrees and decent jobs, though it isn't a guarantee for them. It isn't a guarantee for anyone. However this remains a requirement for any non-Chad to retain even the lowest level Margarets and Gertrudes. Again, going back to hard resources, they are most often a substitute for charm, tact, good looks, height, athleticism, sexual prowess, and humor, in this context. Only the inexperienced will fail to recognize this in "the dating market" free for all.

Tanners also confuse people because they can have, or mimic; popular fashion style, sense of humor, and entertainment media choices. They also may attempt a gym routine, but are often not dedicated enough to make substantial "gainz". Although at first glance a Tanner's style may seem on point, with careful scrutiny it becomes obvious Tanner is a try-hard. Chad wears whatever he feels like. Sometimes he puts literally zero thought into how he presents himself. Tanner never does this. Tanner is always self conscious. He also knows very little about the entertainment media he is careful to always present himself with. This is another dead giveaway of his real identity. Tanners also may have a witty remark to make in the ideal situation, if they speak up first, but it should be noted that it's usually memorized (mimicked from past experience with Chad) and practiced, and that their utter lack of natural improvisational skills will rear its ugly head fairly quickly in an evening of light hearted socialization, leading Tanner to lose the attention of countless Stacys.

Keep an eye out for the subtle indicators of a Tanner, and observe them in the delicate ecosystem that is human group interaction. It will be on the mid-term.

Ed Finn #moonbat #magick rabble.ca

Is COVID-19 Mother Nature’s latest effort to rid herself of the virus of humankind?

Back in the 1970s, chemist James Lovelock, with his associate microbiologist Lynn Marguilis, developed what they called the Gaia hypothesis: the theory that our planet is a sentient organism dedicated to promoting and protecting all forms of life.

Gaia is the ancestral name of the primal Earth goddess, whose regulation of all organic components of life — until the Industrial Revolution and the spread of capitalism — maintained a viable existence for humans and other creatures.

During the past 150 years, however, the operation of international trade and industry has steadily come under the control of “free enterprise” corporations. Their obsessive pursuit of profits for the rich and powerful, and the consequent poverty, hunger and inequality that has devastated nearly half the world’s population, have seriously sabotaged Gaia's global guardianship.

She has witnessed an alarming growth of human overpopulation; the pollution of the planet’s oceans, seas, lakes, rivers and soil; the contamination of its atmosphere with fossil fuel and carbon dioxide emissions; hacking down the rainforests; driving hundreds of animal and marine species to extinction; underdeveloping the planet’s renewable forms of energy, and — most tragically — raising global temperatures to lethally intolerable levels.

Lovelock surmised that humans have now pushed Gaia to her limit of toleration. In self-defence, she has been forced to treat humans as malignant invaders, whose many injurious activities have to be curbed.

She had hitherto confined her retaliatory measures to ramping up floods, droughts, hurricanes, wildfires and other climatic deterrents. But, these having proved ineffective, she has resorted to the imposition of a global pandemic onslaught. Unlike previous such epidemics, however, COVID-19 has two deadlier aspects: it proliferates very quickly, and (so far) has no vaccine.

For humans, such a virulent assault on their health, security, mobility, and social and economic welfare is an appalling experience. The sooner it can be overcome and their lives restored to normal, the better.

For Gaia, on the other hand, COVID-19’s effects are quite beneficial — not just in terms of restraining humans’ harmful activities, such as deforestation, destruction of biodiversity and the depletion of non-renewable resources — but also in helping moderate the baneful effects of human-generated global warming.

A major drop in travel by airplanes, cruise ships and motor vehicles — all significant CO2 emitters — has effectively cut greenhouse gas emissions and helped detoxify the atmosphere.

So has the shutdown of many factories and refineries — also big industrial polluters.

The main question that the COVID-19 pandemic raises is whether such a severe reprimand by Mother Earth — when it eventually runs its course — will be heeded and appropriately acted upon, or whether we will promptly return to our old reckless, asinine and ultimately suicidal ways.

If we take the latter self-destructive course, humankind’s future will be put in imminent jeopardy. With key economic, political, cultural and climate policies continuing to be set by capitalism’s profit-deranged CEOs and investors, hope for the human race’s survival will be inconceivable.

Gaia will of course survive. Over the millennia, she has overseen the rise and fall of many previous dominant lifeforms, from the dinosaurs and reptiles that ruled the planet for 175 million years to mammals and primates such as monkeys and apes, from whom humans eventually evolved.

The crucial distinction between humans and earlier mammals was that humans were endowed with a superior intelligence that, over time, led to hunting and gathering skills and then to farming and high-tech devices. Unfortunately, it also led to wars, poverty, inequality, overpopulation, capitalism and global warming.

If humans precipitate their own extinction, Mother Earth may have a role to play in supplanting us with a species that shuns conflict, greed, inequality and capitalism — and thus survives as long as the dinosaurs.

As we are confined by COVID-19 in our homes for the next several months, we might well contemplate the kind of society we would prefer to have in the aftermath of this crisis. It’s either a resumption of the perilous free-market status quo, or a firm commitment to the creation of a fair, safe, progressive, clean and epidemic-free environment.

The choice we make will shape the future of our children and grandchildren, and the fate of potential generations that may or may not succeed us.

Herewardwakes #fundie reddit.com

The Alt Right is not National Socialism or Fascism. If it was it would just be called National Socialism or Fascism.

You could absolutely be alt-right and favour a fairly limited government free society.

I believe for example that more freedom could quite possibly achieve our goals, if Civil Rights type legislation that coerces white people to associate with non-whites was repealed I think we'd start to see a natural movement back to white ethnic enclaves for example

Just a few small things, like allowing people to make racially based restrictive covenants on properties again, would probably make a huge difference.

Unfortunately the Nazi larping stuff is quite prominent so the tone of debate you'll get when advocating a more libertarian approach will often be quite dismissive.

Mike King #fundie tomatobubble.com

Adolf Hitler was great because Adolf Hitler was good. He was a man for all ages and his noble philosophy is for all races. Hitler's legacy should serve to unite the diverse peoples of the world in the common cause of liberation from the murderous predatory gangsters who work ceaselessly to torture and enslave the peoples of this planet. His great name will be restored one day, but, like Jesus, only after many years of being dragged through the Marxist mud.

How deliciously ironic it is that so many non-Whites seem to be more enthused about Hitler these days than the dumbed-down Whites of the brainwashed West. Perhaps they will be the spark that serves to finally wake the dying West up to the cultural and physical genocide that is rapidly being prepared for the oblivious White Man.

Hitler's 1942 prayer may not have been answered then, but to the Eternal Cosmic Intelligence, the answering of prayers has no time-table. If and when the whole world comes to understand what World War II was really all about; it will be "lights out" for the Satanic scum of The New World Order!

With that hope in mind, let's us close as we began; with Hitler's sincere prayer for ALL humanity - a prayer that is as relevant today as it was then:

"Lord God, give us the strength that we may retain our liberty for our children and our children's children, not only for ourselves but also for the other peoples of Europe, for this is a war which we all wage, this time, not for our German people alone, it is a war for all of Europe and with it, in the long run, for all of mankind."

Amen Chief. A-flippin-men!

various TERFs #fundie reddit.com

(Note: TERFs trying to be philosophical now)

(timetaker999)
How can you read the history of female oppression without becoming a misanthrope?

When I read about it, it just makes me hate people and the concept of society even more. When people talk about the good of civilization, it's simply a justification to strip the individual of their rights because of some imaginary concern people have. If they sat there and didn't care when their daughters and wives lost rights it just goes to show how horrific they are. Because laws are the only thing stopping them from going back, it just makes me realize how horrible human nature is.

(nataliebarney)
I hate men.

(krasnoobsk)
wait until stalking genderists will screen it and present it as a proof of this sub being hate sub

(Caducea)
They can all politely go fuck themselves. The only people that care about their fussy, hypocritical, overdramatic stalking are themselves.

(sortofrecovering)
Ditto.

(nataliebarney)
who cares what they think? We really need not to give a shi*t. Saying what we think is liberating and real freedom! I know how women are socially conditioned but my sisters we need to throw this off. I and the rest of you are already an endangered species; being lesbian, being a radical feminist who critiques the patriarchy.

(Non-PC_RadFem)
I second the motion.

(isabeltydoria)
I have to admit, I look at History and vaguely accept it as a weary "of course men dominated women and ruled over them". I don't have a great imagination and it doesn't seem that tangible to me.
But since finding Reddit and becoming active here I'm realising how many men actually hate women right now, see them as sex objects, and genuinely don't understand what women go through. (And I mean, deep, embedded scorn and hatred and loathing.)
It's baffling to me, it's not something I've knowingly experienced in real life but it now makes me wonder what's under the surface of every random guy I see.

(FeistandFurry)
I think men don't see women as full humans. You are a lesser than to them. This has been my experience interacting with males.(excluding a few sissy gay men I had as friends).
That's not even going into the ones that want to harm and mutilate us. Many carry hatred for us and are oblivious to the reality of being a woman. Their world centers around them being hero of their world and women are just props.
Even in benign conversations men are consistently disrespectful.
At this point in my life I focus on women. I have the best conversations with them.

.
.
.

What I try to do is focus on little aspects of people as individuals. I think macro analysis has its uses but it generally hinders affection on a micro scale.
The other day I was eating breakfast and the waitress was having conversation with this older woman and so between bites of toast I became an audience member. I was like there at the diner bar and they were acknowledging me but I wasn't actually saying anything. Like I said, eating toast.
Anyway, the old lady was talking about her garden and the waitress apparently had this tomato garden.
She then went into detail about the bugs and various issues she had with the garden. They both talked about how wonderful the smell of a fresh tomato is. How great it is to plant things. The wonderful feeling of fresh dew and sunshine.
Both were women who on surface are nothing. Just an old lady and a waitress. But inside they have an internal universe.
Sometimes you have to turn off the macro analysis long enough to zero in on the internal universes of each individual.
Misanthropy is a condition too macro for me to exist in for an indefinite amount of time. The way my brain works is it tends to zoom in and out.

(RadFHarva)
Be a misandrist, don't be a misanthrope ;)
After all, who'se been actively oppressing, mutilating, killing and raping women for milleniums? Males. Who created a whole system of oppression and colonized our thoughts? Males. Female collaborationists played a big role because of internalized misogyny, sure, but were they 100% free to act and in their right mind? Of course not. Hate men, love your sisters.

(languidswan)
I swing between those two states a lot. I'm mildly drunk, so this is going to descend into quasi-philosophical rambling that I might feel like deleting tomorrow, but to me, the question that gets raised is what's the distinguishing quality that resulted in most of violence being...well male violence. I mean, radical feminism gives an axiom-sort of response to that, it's socialization kickstarted from biological moment zero of the material reality of sex and the fact men are physically superior to women. Sort of, if women were given the beginning conditions men were given, would they behave that exact same way?
If the answer is yes, then fuck human design altogether honestly, we should all go DIAF because you can never fix that, even if you remove the current "top of the food chain" someone else will come on top and turn just as sociopathic and corrupt by power. If the answer is no, then I believe in gender to some degree, even if my version of believing in gender on the days I do is more along the lines of "men are hardwired for destruction" than "women are naturally submissive". I suppose between the prey and the predator, only the predator needs to want the uneven power dynamic in order for it to happen, the excuses the prey "wanted it" are just that, excuses and propaganda the predator sells you on so you can't call him hypocritical when he asks for empathetic consideration for himself as a "true full human" that deserves it.
In any case, I don't have an answer to that, I don't think anyone currently does with confidence given the things we know. Regardless, I'd perhaps see myself as a mild antinatalist; honestly, I'm not sure the experience of human life is worth all the inherent or less inherent suffering that gets inflicted upon you. I don't see life as a definitely positive thing (my possibly only consistent moral judgement is that suffering is bad); we're mostly evolutionarily wired to dread suicide and culturally we celebrate life (and not just life -- we like existence) so I understand why that viewpoint is wildly unpopular, and I see the obstacles and flaws in it, I'm far from a militant antinatalist or anything. Still it's my emotional impression of the world, I'm far too indifferent to me or all of us (particularly me) just ceasing to exist from one moment to the next, no warning and suffering involved, and particularly, I'm mildly, privately opposed or at least not as sure it's great when more sentient life gets brought into the mix. Whenever anyone rambles on about the "human race" going extinct and how we should do everything to extend our line and create as many sentient beings as possible, I'm like "meh, let it end, as long as no one has to suffer in the process" (btw I watched the movie "What happened to Monday" the other day, if anyone else watched it and was pissed by the ending as me, hit me up to rant).

(RadFHarva)
We'll live on, wether males are there or not. We appeared before them after all, the XY chromosome is just a mutation. If they indeed change their behavior after gender is destroyed and stop being criminals and rapist then fine, we'll have a great society. If they don't, we'll just have to find a way to continue without them (parthenogenesis or articial semen) and we'll just eradicate the Y (with a male specific disease). When no Y exists on the earth, they'll be gone forever. They can't do the same thing with us btw, since they have an X, too, so thet can't get rid of the x. And we'll be free from oppression and ready to create a perfect society. Either way we're going to win on the long run. I don't fully agree with antinatalists, really poor people in war zones or ppls with genetic illnesses should'nt breed, sure, because exposing kids to that is cruel and unethical, but healthy and affluent (or just average) people can give their offspring a great life.

Some incels #sexist reddit.com

Re: Yes, you're an asshole.

image

@WorldOfCopecraft

If it was a male finding a foid posting on gonewild and talking about being a slut you can bet that he would be called an asshole for telling that roastie’s cuck

AITA for masturbating to naked pictures of my best friend? She feels like I violated her privacy whereas I feel like I did nothing wrong.

ASSHOLE

@balkancel

Say it with me.

Honk honk.

@xxxismydaddyy

Jesus what a shithole

@HomoheroBishii

Jfl, this is one of the best examples where if the genders were reversed, you'd be a "slut shamer repressing women's sexuality" if you told her not to flick her bean to photos of a Chad friend.

@69HonkPill420

The replies in there are so fucking cucked Im drowning in soy just reading them. What the fuck 🤡🌎

@dick_genie

Look at all the replies by the normie fags, holy shit they make me enraged. Of course it's okay for a woman to hide from her boyfriend that she freely posts nude pictures on the internet, but you are the asshole for telling him that! I am sure they will come up with an equally fucked up explanation excusing girls who cheated on their bf.

Some incels #sexist reddit.com

Re: FTM blackpill

(balkancel)
I'm a mentalcel so I do sympathize with her. Or him.

Imagine having this realization, that you just lost all your privilege and your life is going to become irreversible hell as an ugly manlet. Her fault and her choice fully. Yet I can't not feel bad.

The most ironic/saddest thing is, if the blackpill wasn't so controversial with brainlet normies and she was familiar with it, this could've been prevented.

Basically picture being a Chad since birth and one day waking up as yourself, your present incel self. Fucking brutal.

(Coldheartedincel)
This is why there are way more MTF trannies than FTM ones. Most foids would never want to experience the hardships of a man while many men want to experience the much easier life of a woman.

(moneysubber)
Exactly. Assuming all humans have the capacity to tolerate a certain level of hardship why do people think the vast majority transitions are male to female?

It's because many men cannot tolerate the natural level of hardship thrust upon them whereas women can. Why? Because they are by default on easy mode

(kaisercel)

wtf is fun about larping as a man? Took t shots too, dry bagina here we come

FtM trannies genuinely think that men are extremely privileged, so they transition thinking that they'll 'become privileged', but in reality, all they become is depressed.

They're too stupid to realise that they have it easy, not us

Oh absolutely, they're the aristocracy complaining that the peasants have too much grain.

(Mgtow_troaway)
FTM rates are the actual trans rates in the population, that's roughly how many MTF there should be. The reason there's so many more MTF is because a bunch of non-dysphoric incels are tryna see if they can switch life to tutorial mode

If tech ever advances to make gendermorphing flawless, there'll be like 8 guys left, each with their own harem nation

(JFLmaxx)
Last sentence is supreme unintentional blackpill truth.

How many nanoseconds before a woman manipulated the truth to benefit women and trannies and continue to gaslight men with blame?

(texanapocalypse33)
I knew an ftm a few years ago. 6 months after surgery and successfully passing, s/he got their first false rape accusation. If he wasn't rich, he'd be the only vagina in a male prison right now and you can guess how that would've turned out. Last I heard he went back to being adrogynous female appearing so as to avoid being treated like a man by strangers

(Concerned-father2)
My sister in law transitioned to a top lesbian (as opposed to bottom). One year later, she was blackpilled as F. Made a meme about how women were all the same on tinder, posted a couple of tweets about how basic women were and basically came off as a redpilled/blackpilled misogynist bastard. Got severely depressed and told me she felt like killing herself from time to time, that life as a man is hell compared to a woman.

(UnjustLiving)
ROPE OR COPE BRAH, i swear more of these degenerates who call us scum and such should go through test. therapy and see how living as a man is like playing the game on hardmode, not only do we have to provide for ourselves but we have to be sustainable, we have to persevere through any fucking object, and while being hated by society, being sub 5 male is truly one of the hardest things in life with the exception of living in a 3rd world country but as far as 1st world goes it's being a male.

(jonarbuckleup)
No wonder so many guys want to become girls in hope of being treated like human beings for once.

Alfred Lambremont Webre #conspiracy goldenageofgaia.com

[Mr Carnicom has expressed that these views are not his own, and review of the cited report has shown this to be largely true. Any sentence that does not directly quote Mr Carnicom should not be considered to be his belief, including those that reference him without a direct quote. Seriously, only the quotes and the list of seven items seem accurate. Which leaves this as a complete fucking baffling bit of bullshit someone else wrote and ascribed a number of their own beliefs to him. The author has been updated to the individual the article is supposedly written by.]

Clifford E. Carnicom, an acknowledged expert since 1999 on the global covert spraying of aerosols into the atmosphere operation (also known as “Chemtrails”), stated in an exclusive ExopoliticsTV interview with Alfred Lambremont Webre released March 1, 2011 that the covert aerosol-spraying operation had transformed the Earth’s atmosphere into a plasma for carrying out weaponized applications such as bio-warfare (including Morgellons disease), electromagnetic operations such as HAARP, weather warfare, tectonic (earthquake) warfare, mind control, advanced surveillance technology, and detection of advanced propulsion technology including UFOs.

The over-all purpose of this covert operation of spraying aerosols into the atmosphere and converting it into plasma was to achieve “absolute control” over the global human population. This total control is accomplished using the combined effects of seven weapons-like applications that use the plasma-like atmosphere with weaponized effects on the environment, the biosphere and the human population.

Although Mr. Carnicom prefers to use the term “aerosols”, the global covert operation spraying of aerosols into the atmosphere is also known as the “chemtrails program”.

In a Jan. 10, 2011 assessment of the current impact of the global aerosol-spraying program, Mr. Carnicom stated, “The vitality and viability of human existence and life on this planet, as it has been known to exist, is under threat.”

[...]

In the ExopoliticsTV interview, Mr. Carnicom details seven weapons applications of the covert global sprayed aerosols program that are being used to carry out over-all the goal of “absolute control” over the global human population.

These seven weapons applications of the sprayed aerosols are:

1. Biological operations, including the use of apparent bio-warfare, such as Morgellons disease, in the sprayed aerosols, constituting war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and the Geneva conventions.

2. Military Operations, such as advanced radar applications, anti-missile Star Wars applications.

3. Electromagnetic Operations, including HAARP directed energy scalar weapons and mind control weapons applications, constituting war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and the Geneva conventions.

4. Environmental modification and weather wars. Mr. Carnicom stated he has concluded that the covert aerosol-spraying program has transformed the atmosphere of the planet into plasma capable of sustaining weaponized applications since its acceleration in 1999. This constitutes a violation of the 1978 Treaty against Modification of the Environment.

5. Geophysical operations, including tectonic (earthquake) warfare, constituting war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and the Geneva conventions.

6. An advanced surveillance system capable of covert surveillance of the entire human population.

7. Detection of exotic propulsion systems, including detection of off-planet or interdimensional UFOs.

[...]

We must have accurate information. With our current exposure on complete overload, we simply cannot wait more months or years. In fact, what do we think we are waiting for? In many parts of the US, the Chemtrails assault appears to have intensified over the past two months. Just look at the artificially induced crazed weather around the US just during this past month: The temperature in Texas was 0-degrees yesterday; and whatever “white stuff” is falling from the skies throughout New England is not snow that looks anything like what used to fall 15 years ago. This white material smells full of chemicals. The Chemtrails-Weather Modification [read: destruction] situation is now far past critical.

“How many people have had their air tested for these metals by a reputable independent lab [with no government ties]? How many of the millions of people who love to garden have tested their soils? When the robins return in the Spring, will they be pulling heavily-pesticided and Manganese-infested worms (part of the web of life and our food chain) out of the ground to eat? What other mass bird deaths might follow? [Note: a well-known scientist told me that the recent mass bird and fish deaths were caused by man-made scalar activity. Their deaths were not natural.] It is now essential that, over a short period of time, we make a collective effort to get samples tested around the country. Resources can be pooled. Other things that could also be included for analysis are biological materials (molds, fungi, viruses), Phosgene, EDB [Ethylene dibromide], polymers, and possibly radioactive uranium, thorium, and strontium. We can then have a clear picture of the extent of the damage to which we are subjected. For our SAFETY, this is now of the utmost urgency.

“Standard blood tests do not show up heavy metals poisoning. However, a simple hair analysis can detect heavy metals, so people have a base from which to determine their own risks. This hair analysis can even be done for your pets. Many toxic chemicals and heavy metals have overlapping and similar poisoning symptoms. So, it is always important to consult your primary health care provider. The only problem there is that most physicians have little-to-no-training in environmental medicine, or the effects of these omnipresent poisons, or how to treat them. This is now in abundant evidence with the nine-and-and-a-half-month mega-crisis situation in the Gulf of Mexico. There are not enough doctors who really know how to deal with this epic catastrophe caused by the mixture of lethal Corexit dispersants, crude oil, and Chemtrails. Doctors Without Borders and the American Academy of Environmental Medicine both have been silent. This is reprehensible. Around the Gulf, hospitals are overwhelmed. This is an unprecedented brew of poisons. However, depending upon the extent of medical issues, it is possible to detox from heavy metal poisoning –provided this toxic aerosol assault stops.

“Since the new millennium began, there has been a concerted and sped-up effort to destroy decades of environmental laws that had been enacted to protect us. We now have corporations running our country into the ground with the help of “public” officials whose salaries come from our taxes. This is done with the cooperation of news media that hardly do either any investigative journalism or truthful reporting. We now need this so urgently; and it is essential to our very continued existence. Mainstream news is distracting “spin” but certainly not real news. This is especially relevant, as it concerns our less well-educated younger generations who do not have accurate news input, or often the ability to analyze issues, and/or think critically. They are constantly on their cell phones and oblivious to much else. Here, too, there is abundant documentation and scientific reports of the brain damage done by daily cell phone use. Brain cancer, once rare, is now on a steep rise.

[...]

“In addition, high-tech “Star Trek” type instruments surround our every move. From cell phones and their towers, Wi-Fi, and HAARP. Added to this horrific brew also are illegal and criminal military uses of Depleted Uranium on civilians, and the Gulf of Mexico’s nine-month attack under the deadly Corexit dispersant (now carried on the winds around our planet) mixed with Chemtrails, and other carcinogenic chemicals. Our immune systems and our lives are under chronic siege! Anyone living anywhere near the Gulf of Mexico is already at life risk. The natural functioning of our immune systems has been severely compromised and damaged. Despite national and international laws that supposedly forbid the use of these assorted dangers on humans, nothing has been done to stop any of this. We continue to be uninformed experimental laboratory animals for secret agendas by imbedded “Trojan horses” that are causing all of us extreme, but often invisible, harm every day. In humankind’s entire history, there has never been such an environmental toxic assault on us. As I have written numerous times: Invisible technology, or the chemicals we don’t see (but are breathing and eating), doesn’t mean we are safe. None of this is sustainable for life on our planet. Certainly not for our children and grandchildren.

“It is possible not to shop at any company that harms us. Why should we support them with our hard-earned money (and its increasing shrinking power)? Do we want to continue to get sucked into a completely broken system that does not value anything but destruction and war? Just look at all the social services that are being continuously cut to the bone, while the behemoth military budget is the largest in our history. All our social services are being gutted. Global Research reported on January 18 that “Obama may cut Social Security.”(16) Do we get it? Everything else, that once made ours a shinning example to other countries, is being deliberately destroyed by those in charge. These economic and environmental crises are no accident. They are planned.

CH #fundie heartiste.wordpress.com

Very sneaky of this tub of soy to use the category “middle eastern refugees” rather than the more precise and relevant “moslem”, which includes all moslems residing in America rather than just those officially designated as refugees recently escaping a war zone. The latter category — “moslem” — has a terrorist attack rate in America 5,000% higher than the rate for non-moslems.

[When you miss the point so hard you get a PhD in the new geometry you invented]

And the vapid conflation of terrorist attacks with falling down stairs is par for the shitlib course. Stairs don’t surprise us with pipe bombs in the subway. We all know where the stairs are and the risks inherent in climbing or descending them. But the goal of moslem terrorists goes beyond their kill count; their objective is to spread fear and panic that death could come at any time and in any place. And, unlike stairs, moslems kill in the name of a religion, and have deep and wide networks of fellow moslems helping them in their deranged cause. They have an agenda, which stairs do not.

Finally, one has to scoff at the asterisked fine print on this bugman’s posterboard. He went out of his way to assure viewers he has “citations” for his claims.

But who will fact check the fact checkers?

(anyone with descended testicles)

Anyhow, that PURE CUCKFACE is a lesson in physiognomy. A quick glance at his problem glasses and his smug doughy androgynous puffboy mug is all you need to know he’d be the type to WELL ACHSHUALLY about moslem terrorism and welcome an invasion of hued hordes….into somebody else’s neighborhood. It’s also the look of a pasty blob who just hit the button on his rectally-inserted orgasm egg.

Anne Kennedy #fundie patheos.com

(=First of a two part post/rant about Glennon Doyle Melton, a Christian blogger/author who came out as a lesbian and married a woman=)

I mentioned in our podcast yesterday the tragic downfall of Glennon Doyle Melton. I would like to point out a few obvious home truths. Incidentally, of course it would be nice to think nuanced and fascinating thoughts, to grasp at difficult insights that have not been articulated by others, to, in short, be Novel. But this point in Christian history doesn’t seem to be calling for that sort of thinking. We seem to be needing to go back to the most basic point, the expression of the most essential truths. And the most essential of all of them is...

What is love?

This foundation of Christian doctrine has been so muddled and twisted, squandered really, by the modern Westerner, that we have to keep going back to the very beginning point of Christian Faith in order to answer this tragic confusion.

So Glennon, like so many, got married, had some children, and found herself in the usual way of coping with a too difficult life, a broken relationship with herself, and a cheating husband. In the midst of this, she turned out to be a top notch writer and so wrote her way through her difficulties and troubles. Here she has my complete sympathy. I am sitting here at this very minute in desperate pursuit of mental health through writing. Writing is my life line. If I don’t write every day, I become unhinged. And gosh, isn’t it nice if people read your writing? Everyone has been reading Glennon. That I haven’t is my own fault. I need to get out more and read more. I’ve read a few of her blog posts, though, and they are breezy, brilliant. The writing is what you Want when you click on the Internet.

But good writing does not a theologian nor a Christian make. Any one of us can put ourselves out there but the church–the people who know and love God and his Son Jesus Christ through the power of the Holy Spirit of whatever denomination and background–have a duty, an obligation, to articulate the gospel clearly and repudiate those who call themselves Christian but do not adhere to basic Christian doctrine. For the sake of Glennon herself, because she has claimed the name of Christ, I find I must say no to her new way of life.

Let’s just quickly look at what she says about love, both for herself, and more troublingly, for her children. She writes, “I want you to grow so comfortable in your own being, your own skin, your own knowing – that you become more interested in your own joy and freedom and integrity than in what others think about you. That you remember that you only live once, that this is not a dress rehearsal and so you must BE who you are. I want you to refuse to betray yourself. Not just for you. For ALL OF US. Because what the world needs — in order to grow, in order to relax, in order to find peace, in order to become brave — is to watch one woman at a time live her truth without asking for permission or offering explanation.”

And about her children, “They have the love and support of their dad, me, their grandparents, their aunts and uncles, their church, their teachers, their friends’ families –all of whom have fallen as hard for Abby as they have. They’re lucky kids, to be surrounded by so much love. We have family dinners together – all six of us — and Abby cooks. (She is an AMAZING chef because Jesus loves me). We go to the kids’ school parties together. We are a modern, beautiful family. Our children are loved. So loved. And because of all of that love, they are brave.”

You can find the longer post on her Facebook page.

Let me begin by saying that throwing over your broken marriage to join with another woman isn’t actually brave any more. It’s one of the easiest choices on the table. It may not feel easy in the moment, but what you are doing is embracing a copy of yourself, and you are doing it with the culture’s complete approbation. Bravery is when you do something difficult that ought to be done but you don’t want to do it, but you do it against your desires, for the sake of another. The choice of Glennon to be with a woman is the choice to go with self expression and the love of the self over the love of another and of God.

And that’s the confusion, isn’t it? It’s everywhere. In Christianity you are called to die to yourself, to die to the very essential nature of who you are which has been so corrupted and marred by sin that it is irrevocably bound to eternal death. This is the state of the human person. Not a single human person escapes the sentence of death that came when we chose to love ourselves rather than the Other, that is God. And however painful it is to face, no one gets a pass on this sentence. We all go down the grave one by one, dust to dust, because we idolatrously chose to love ourselves rather than our Creator.

No amount of embracing the self will cure the ills of the soul. No Amount. There is nothing you can do to love yourself enough to rescue your soul from death. You can’t. There is no human solution to the death dealing cavern that separates us from God.

That is why God himself had to cross over that cavern by himself. He had to come and absorb our sin and our rejection of him in himself. That is the cross. He took our catastrophic and poisonous self love onto himself and died the death we should have died.

When we cling to him, the death we endure, though it feels very great, is actually very small. Still, it is not easy to say no to the self, to put to death that essential poisoned self. It can’t happen without God himself carrying you through to eternity.

And I really hate to say it, but this is going to have to be part one, because I have somewhere to be. But I will pick up right here tomorrow, and will probably have another part after that. I hope you who know and love Jesus will pray for Glennon and her children and her husband and her new person and plead with God to enlighten the eyes of her heart that she might finally see him for who he is. See you tomorrow!

The Distributist #wingnut #dunning-kruger twitter.com

More needs to be said about the self-identity of western progressives. I would maintain that the defense of this identity (and its virtue) explains most of the insanity coming from the left today.

I notice two tricks, in particular, being used by leftists here.

First trick, linguistic, is the creation of loose words for their own political radicalism. These words are used to organize and galvanize when new, when discredited however they disappear and seem to apply to no one. We can see this in labels like “AntiFa” which the left has defended for years but now seems to be a figment of our collective imaginations. It also applies to general terms (“SJW” and “woke”). Who coined these? The left. But to hear their account they are right wing smears. This is process is complemented by the second trick, historical, that defines “progressive”, as by its essential nature, to be good, honest, and always winning. As such their history curves around counter examples and a self flattering triumphalist narrative is constructed. Whereas real identities (religion, ethnicity, and nation) refer to real things and therefore have real messy records of good and bad actions, the progressive identity need not worry itself with such troubling nuance. Any evil doer who called themselves a “leftist” or “progressive” in the past is vetoed from their history by definition. The inquisition & crusades will forever be part of “Catholic history”, but Eugenics and the Gulags are not and never will be part of “progressive” history. Progressivism is of course a religion. But these deceptive tactics give it the ability to do things we don’t usually allow. The first is the construction of impossible to meet historical moral standards. Since the left can never be held to account this is a fun excercise.

The second is an ability to shift standards in order to maintain its dual illusions (“always right and always wing”). For this reason neither the progressive moralist nor prophet ever need to doubt their work. But also as a consequence, the ideology itself is mercurial. Many have said that progressives see “progress as God” (e.g. it cannot fail it can only be failed) but the problem is deeper. The “God” the progressives worship has no nature, it is shifting, and ephemeral. There is no there there. Progressives have created for themselves and identity that always wins and that is always good, but the price they pay is that this identity is entirely EMPTY. It has nothing in it.

As such the progressive is the culmination the ne plus ultra of the rootless and stale modern condition, as sad as that is.

Can we not all strive something more authentic in our own identities?

Fin

Some incels #sexist reddit.com

This is what happens when an incel ‘ascends’

image

(janniekilla)
This is the type of situation where I pray her husband is one of those beta cucked normies who roid rages at the thought his woman getting fucked by another man.

here's to hoping he follows her to one of those hotel rooms one day and goes ryan gosling Drive on both of them

(Administrative_Worth)
I've looksmaxxed recently over the past 8 motnhs and have had some attention from my oneitis. Knowing foid mindset, I literally had like a prophecy vision, one day, maybe in our 30's/40's when she realises how weird I am, and that we've bene together for a while she will cheat. Hell so many women want to cheat, its ridiculous. They just feel like doing it.

(ReformedConvict)

I think its better to stay single....

It is. It really is. Any ugly/short/crippled guy is an absolute idiot if he thinks a women's "interest" in him is romantic or sexual. The only women who date unattractive men are those with other motives - settlers under pressure to get married no matter what the cost to her dignity, ugly women desperate to escape loneliness, gold diggers seeking a meal ticket, etc. When a woman prostitutes herself like this, not only is she gonna be demanding as fuck in order to compensate for the lack of attraction, but she WILL eventually resent him, and whatever table scraps of sex and affection he was getting will dry up the minute she feels she has him locked down. If you absolutely must get married, you better invest in however much plastic surgery it takes to become good looking, otherwise any marriage you get will be a miserable one. Even if it's obvious you had a lot of surgeries, fake/uncanny valley beauty is far more attractive than natural ugliness.

(gyangyanman)

No it doesn't because this was written by a dude pretending to be a girl pretending to cheat.

You are very naive. Reddit has an absolutely massive female userbase and they post about all kinds of shit willingly because it's easy to stay anonymous. I interacted with a reddit foid who was a self admitted slut and told me she wanted to be my whore and I was 100% sure it was a troll, but then I asked her for a selfie and she sent one.

You are still bluepilled as fuck if you are under the impression that women don't think about sex like this.

(Brokemgtow)
I agree; people talk about easy mode this and easy mode that, but as soon as a story drops that is so far beyond what people are used to, they call it larp.

But in reality we are are guarding our minds, because some of us cant grasp someone living life to the fullest, and to that extend,

because we definitely dont, and they can, so we cant fathom that reality of unadulterated liberation

(baldingindianjanitor)
why do women like rough sex its weird!

(billybones11)
It's very weird.

I was oblivious for most of my life, because I had an online gf who I sex text'd with who was into receiving oral, but 95% of women want to be dominated in some way in the bedroom. Especially if you're chad. Maybe if you're billy beta, they'll prefer to "make love" once a month.

CALVIN FREIBURGER #fundie liveactionnews.org

image
In their never-ending quest to impugn the motives of pro-lifers, abortion defenders have accused us of hypocrisy because some support the death penalty and others oppose various government benefits.

Another variation of this attack has surfaced in our comment threads recently. Sharon Rose says the only way we can justify opposing abortion would be if we’re “equally and as vehemently against war, against the death penalty, against killing of any kind.” Astraspider asks if we respected human life “when we punished 100,000 Iraqis with their lives to avenge 3,000 of our own deaths they had nothing to do with[.]” The alleged hypocrisy of simultaneously being pro-life and “pro-war” is a very popular talking point.

But as with many other pro-abortion efforts, the logic of this attack doesn’t extend beyond the superficial. To start by getting the obvious out of the way, the pro-life movement isn’t of one mind on foreign policy, meaning pro-aborts will need to find some other reason to hate those of us who don’t fit their generalization.

The claim doesn’t fare much better against the rest of us, either, because nobody is simply “pro-war” in the sense that it’s something to celebrate, as if they value conquest and bloodshed for their own sake. Everybody supports American involvement in some wars (just about everyone except hardcore pacifists agrees on World War II, for instance) and opposes involvement in others, based on the unique circumstances of particular cases.

We could endlessly argue the merits of our nation’s interventions in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, or any number of other conflicts throughout our history, as well as the various mistakes made in each one. Such a debate, however, would depend largely on hotly contested factual questions, in-depth historical analysis, and navigating the nuances of international politics, and therefore falls more within the scope of a foreign policy website than a pro-life one.

Suffice to say, proponents of a given military action believe their cause is warranted under just war theory: it is meant to end or prevent a greater loss of life than that of the war itself, non-violent alternatives have been exhausted, effort is made to spare civilians as much suffering as possible, etc. Such judgments may be correct or mistaken depending on the case, but they don’t constitute a devaluing of human life.

What our critics are really saying, then, is that we have to be pacifists in order to truly be pro-life. Which is an absurd standard, considering that no right other than thought is completely without limitation. Is it “anti-freedom” to support imprisoning felony convicts? Is it “anti-speech” to support libel laws? Is it “anti-life” to let police officers use lethal force? Clearly not. It’s entirely reasonable, principled, and consistent to value a right while recognizing limitations on it when it comes into unavoidable conflict with other rights.

Lastly, and most importantly, the potential wrongness of any given war and of those who support them has no bearing on the case against abortion. We could concede the wrongness of every single war this nation’s ever fought, and it still wouldn’t justify letting us slaughter the unborn. There is simply no comparison between killing an enemy soldier on the battlefield and the needless and killing a baby in the womb. The former (in just wars) involves someone who knew the risks going in and has defensive capabilities, and is meant to save lives in the long run. The latter involves an innocent, defenseless victim, and saves nobody.

Indeed, abortion’s death toll still dwarfs the American casualty count of every major war we’ve ever fought, and matches the combined total. Crying hypocrisy isn’t enough to clean the blood off abortion defenders’ hands.

melaninmagic #racist africaspeaks.com

SPIRITUAL CALCIFICATION associated with chronic melanin deficiency. This diagnosis is the explanation for the misery and strife that all the earths' children have been subjected to by the non-melanated for centuries. That these folk still haven't gotten their act together for so long is not because they don't want to, but simply because they don't know how; Divine Guidance to this end is severely lacking. How can an individual alter his/her ways if deeply rooted in their sub-conscious there exists a spiritual void that makes them oblivious to the TRUE suffering they cause (i.e. lack of empathy to the hueman condition)? Ofcourse, this is not to say that all euro-decendents suffer from this disease or that there is no cure for this physio-spiritual ailment. Albeit a slow process, erradication of this disease has only been sucessfully achieved through 'mixing' whether this be on a social or genetic level. Something to think about...

_Ryo_Hazuki #fundie reddit.com

The ironic thing is if the standards were applied equally, we're among the only men that are NOT rapists.

Since the definition of "rape" has gone from "sex without consent" to "sex a woman does not enjoy" that makes all non-incel straight men rapists. The idea of a woman enjoying sex is for the most part male fantasy. Women use sexuality to get things (money, attention, etc.) but hate the act itself. That's another reason I want a sexless relationship, neither of us would enjoy it. I'm too black pilled to play such a childish make pretend game. If I'm gonna LARP I'd rather do so on the computer as a good looking 2d character from a Mongolian toilet repair series.

But I find it ironic that men who have engaged in intercourse (Or "piv" as millennials call it) an act that is inherently uncomfortable (and often painful) for a woman, who would rather be doing anything else... and then come here and call a group of kissless hugless virgins "rapists". And of course those comments get le upboats because this is reddit.

(Emphasis original)

Gymcelled #sexist incels.co

[Blackpill] The top 10% of antisocial men are responsible for 27% of pregnancies and 62% of violent assaults against women

This study will show us what kind of personality men need to have the most success with women

"LCP" stands for Life-course-persistent, they are the men who have been antisocial all their life ever since they were a kid. They have the WORST PERSONALITY since FOREVER and NEVER IMPROVE. They are the 10 percentile when it comes to antisocial behavior. The worst of the worst.

Surprise surprise, these men are extremely successful with women despite their personality, they are responsible for 27% of pregnancies despite making up 10% of the population. They are responsible for 62% of convictions for violence against women and are overrepresented when it comes to unemployment and most crimes.

"the childhood-onset delinquents were the most elevated on psychopathic personality traits, mental-health problems, substance dependence, numbers of children, financial problems, work problems, and drug-related and violent crime, including violence against women and children"

So this is the amazing personality women want. Unemployed drug addicts who pummel women, commit various crimes and don't try to better their personalities are slaying the most

image

You'll also notice the other group "AL" which stands for adolescence limited. These are men who grow out of their antisocial phase. You'll notice that they're also overrepresented when it comes to unemployement, crimes, violence against women AND OF COURSE PREGNANCIES.

"The adolescent-onset delinquents at 26 years were less extreme but elevated on impulsive personality traits, mental-health problems, substance dependence, financial problems, and property offenses"

image

Males on the life-course-persistent and adolescence-limited antisocial pathways: Follow-up at age 26 years

Women are bluepilled on the streets but blackpilled in the sheets

Not sure I'd call them blackpilled in any way considering they're convinced that they're choosing the men with the best personalities.

Personality matters :feelskek:

If it does it seems to be 100% the opposite of what we're told every day :feelshaha:

Darktriadpill single-handedly destroys mainstream narratives about morality and being a 'nice guy'.

It's infuriating though, all our life we're accused of being horrible people, the gaslighting never stops. And then you realize that the worst kind of people get EVERYTHING in life while you're blamed for it

Women love narcissistic Chads who LARP as charismatic but are really petulant and aggressive children.

That's what I've noticed irl. Thug chads, drug addict chads, and just in general very impulsive chads like to think they're some sort of complex and unique leading figure going against societal rule.

Holy shit - so the group who commit violence against women at a rate of 18x the non-violent men are 4x more likely to be fathers? In effect, saying that violence has a positive impact factor of 72!!!

What the fuck...

I wouldn't extrapolate things like that because we all know looks matter the most. The point is just that it looks like the worst type of men are the most successful. Which goes completely against the whole "improve your personality bro" and "don't be a dick bro"

Henry Makow, PhD #conspiracy #racist #sexist #wingnut #psycho #homophobia #transphobia henrymakow.com

Occult Attack - Ten Examples of this Occult War on Civilization

The list below is not meant to be detailed or exhaustive but to provide a list to see the virus hoax in context.

1. Immigration & Migration - To re-engineer humanity as servants, the Protocols state, "we will destroy every collective force but our own." (16-4) The four legs of human identity (collective force) are race, religion, nation, and family. Migration undermines two of these directly, race and nation, and the other two indirectly. They are a form of gerrymandering to ensure people of European descent become a minority and are disenfranchised.

2. Vaccinations, Chemtrails, Fluoride and Soy. They are inoculating us with diseases, making us comatose and feminizing males. In general, a satanic cult such as Western society has become, controls and exploits its members by corrupting and making them sick. Western society is obsessed with sickness which is a bigger industry than war.

3. Control of information and discourse - Media and higher education now are mind control instruments. Political correctness & censorship punish thought crimes.- Non-Conformity leads to loss of employment.
Gaslighting - political widgets can say anything and be taken seriously. As with 9-11 plane disappearing into Pentagon, the goal is to make us question reality.

4. False flag terror is used to confiscate guns (Christchurch) and to justify war (9-11) or civil strife (Notre Dame) Mass surveillance using CCTV, Internet, and smart devices.

5. Satanism, occultism, violence and sexual depravity in the entertainment industry. Major stars are all Satan worshippers.
Their success isn't based on talent alone. They have sold their souls to the devil. Increasingly our culture and entertainment reflect that of a satanic cult.

6. Agenda 21; "Climate Change" -- comprehensive UN Plan to limit economic development & control the world.

7. The Demonrat Party: Making removing Trump their first priority and lying.
Buying votes by promising the moon for free. The media constantly gaslighting us re. 9-11, JFK assassination, Syrian gas attacks, and numerous mass shootings (Sandy Hook, Parkland.) The Communist Manifesto calls for state control of communication (#6) - which we effectively have when we realize that media corporations are all controlled by the central bankers.

8. Attack on marriage and family by erasing traditional heterosexual values using pornography, sexual liberation, gender dysphoria, homosexuality and transgenderism. Sexual "liberation" is pure Satanism because it dehumanizes and makes sex an end in itself.

Disregarding female rights by allowing trannies in their bathrooms. Canada issues apology to gays and new "equality" coin. Some say transgenderism is the worship of "the Beast" before his return. This is all presented in terms of tolerance and progress; in fact, the aim is to undermine and shred the social fabric.

9. Income inequality. The "one percent" In France, Chile, Iraq, and Lebanon, people are in the streets because they can't make ends meet.

10. Attack on white men and the promotion of miscegenation. Undermining all races but especially people of European descent. This is an ad from the Saturday paper seeking a Journeyman Electrician starting at $71K. They give preferences to anything that isn't a white male: They "encourage candidates to indicate on their application if they are a woman, Aboriginal person, a person with a disability, or member of a visible minority." Whatever happened to hiring on the basis of merit and not discriminating against anyone?

In conclusion, the only way out of this morass is to nationalize central banks and disavow debt created out of nothing.

Or for the Masonic Jewish leaders to have a change of heart, and become the benefactors of humanity instead of its deranged cruel jailers.

MK_Ultralord #racist reddit.com

[OP of "Japanese culture hate thread"]

Why does everyone in the modern fucking politicsphere idolize this shit nation.

Sure it has tight border control but that's it. That's the only "good" thing about it.

• It's an atheist nation that is "culturally Shinto." If "Cultural Christians" are anything to go by then these Jap atheist are moral relativist who larp as Shintos.

• Rampant homophila, beastiality and pedophilia in their media. The term "Loli" and "trap" shows how common this is. Also their AOC laws is disgustingly low. They are a country of irradiated paedophiles and for anyone to point to this and say it's progress shows that the slippery slope isn't a fallacy

• Gay pride parades, just because they rumored to be less obsene doesn't make it any better.

• Any non homophiliac media they have rarely features any Japanese people, even one of the key anime artists said modern anime doesn't resemble people anymore. For WN to idealize this country is retarded, alot of their media could be considered foreigner influenced and not Japanese.

• See above, Most hick style racist country in the world. As in, they blame foreigners for a problem that they legitimately caused by themselves and think their shit godless nation is great.

• Disgustingly consumerist capitalist. The whole "you don't have a lifestyle outside working for the corporation" is like something written in a dystopian novel.

• Parents being such pussies not to kick out their lazy otaku sons and daughters to the point it drains so heavily on the welfare of the country and caused the government to address it directly even has a name called Hikkimori.

Japan needs to open it's borders. I want to see it crumble under it's own weight. I hate Japan and frankly CF doesn't trash the gooks enough. It's a good way of pissing off the alt-right by trashing Japan

The Christian Party #fundie christianparty.net

Isn't it strange that Americans are so consumed with images of millions of Jews dying in Nazi concentration camps that they are oblivious to 216 million Christians who died? Nobody, not even jews, disputes that less than half the population of concentration camps were jews. Who were the other half? Christians. Even if you accepted the Holocaust story in its entirety as historical fact, this is still 25 times as many Christians as Jews who died. Many of these Christians died in the course of defending their homes and homelands, rather than in concentration camps where Jews were herded after they successfully lobbied for and got gun control laws in pre-war Germany, just as they're now doing in the US.

Vince Dhimos #wingnut #conspiracy newsilkstrategies.com

The inability of most grassroots Americans to see the whole picture of the US Establishment’s actions and intentions will be the downfall of the US.

Many Trump supporters blindly believe that Trump is pro-Russia but anti-China.

I get many messages from Trump supporters indoctrinated by MAGA propaganda, who say they admire Putin but that they don’t trust China. Some acquaintances of mine who lead “peace” organizations say essentially the same thing, praising Putin but smearing Xi. These people are hopelessly naive to think that Putin would ever betray Xi Jinping because of some foolish suggestion of theirs or their government’s. Look, if you want to be friendly toward Russia, then you have to be aware that Russia’s main hope in the world is China, nothing else. Only China and Russia have the clout and the economic and military power to oppose the war-mongering US-led West, and they both know it. To think that some puny little peace activist or some oversized US official could possibly sway one of them to turn against the other is utter brainlessness.

Of course many MAGA enthusiasts remember that Trump had said in his campaign that he thought he could “get along with Putin,” and they foolishly figured that Trump is a friend of Russia and that the whole “Deep State” wants the poor man to be punished for his supposed friendliness toward Putin. They are partly right because certain prominent Democrats have tried to have Trump impeached on silly charges, but these hyperliberals are not deeply enough embedded in the Establishment to understand the nuances of US foreign policy. Further, these hyperpatriots on the far right have apparently slept through all the anti-Russian sanctions that Trump promoted, and all the flashing lights spelling out that, despite the show of friendliness toward Putin, he is fully engaged in the Establishment’s game of trying to drive a wedge between Russia and China. Of course, Trump and his cronies in Big Government miss the clear signals that this policy of theirs is a non-starter and that Russia and China will not only always be close partners – de facto allies – in their opposition to the US and its sleazy tricks, and the more virulent the anti-China campaign becomes, the tighter their bond will become. This is because Russia and China are a whole lot smarter than the Washington misfits give them credit for.

Since Congress first opened up trade with China in the 80s, the ulterior motive of the biggest Neocons and Neoliberals was to use China as a tool to keep these two countries from forming an alliance that might throw a spanner into Washington's plans for world domination. It never worked out, especially after Putin stepped into the picture. Yet they keep hatching their childish plots to propagandize Russia into abandoning its partnership with China. The very existence of these obvious ploys to weaken their friendship is a major factor that drives them together, but that never occurs to the Washington game players, who never bother to follow Sun-Tzu’s advice to know the enemy.

Just last week, a rumour surfaced in both Israeli and US media that supposedly Putin was ready to turn his back on Assad. It was a brainless attempt to sow chaos by making Assad think Putin was about to ditch him, and was the umpteenth time this kind of fake news had been tried, to no avail, of course. Just a few days ago, Russian officials pointed out that the Russian who started this rumour was not a Russian official and that the rumour was not true.

Now comes Mike Pompeo offering an olive branch to Russia, obviously in an attempt to ensnare Russia into a plot to weaken China. Nobody is falling for it in Russia or China, but that won’t prevent Pompeo from thinking he is a genius for dreaming up this cute little plot.

CrossRufus #dunning-kruger #conspiracy #fundie #crackpot #pratt reddit.com

One thing I have been increasingly taking notice of is how e-skepticals - you know, the "science, reason, facts and logic" crowd, people you can easily find at internet communities such as "Fundies Say The Darndest Things", "RationalWiki" and basically most left-wing forums - tend to be extremelly vain, ego-driven and arrogantic. For instance, let's illustrate this with a hypothetical situation: imagine it's scientific consensus that a few million years ago there was a frozen continent named "Lumumba" and that a random man named Edmund contests the existence of Lumumba; according to the skepticals Edmund is a mentally unstable idiot whose brain lives in an alternative reality. At a first glance it could seem fair to regard him as such, he's in disagreement with thousands of individuals who are educated on that field after all, right? However, let's take into account that Edmund currently has no means to verify these claims by himself (like most people) and it basically has no relevance at all to his practical life; having that in mind, one should start to question if it really makes sense to mock and belittle that person. Why must he believe what a bunch of people with diplomas tell him on the matter in order to not be deemed as intelectually inferior? If having an inquisitive mindset is so valued and praised by the "facts and reason" crew then why people like Edmund are supposed to just accept everything scientists say? Why does that say anything about his mental health if believing or not believing in Lumumba causes literally zero negative impact in his life or in the lives of others? The whole issue here comes down to the fact that these skepticals aren't really interested in promoting scientific thinking and skepticism but rather in feeding their own ego and trying to affirme themselves as smart and enlightened in comparison to the "idiotic science-denying bigoted cranky fundies"; that's why you have youtube videos with titles such as "physicist reacts to flat-earthers" and websites such as the ones mentioned at the beggining (RationalWiki and FDST), it's all a huge group session of intellectual masturbation.

And no, I am not strawmaning, that hypothetical situation is based-off something quite similar I saw on a FDST thread: it was a comment that labeled anyone who took Pink Swastika (a book about alleged homosexuals in the Nazi Party and the connection between homossexuality and the fascist ideology) seriously was clinically insane. I mean, really? The view one has about things that happened more than seven decades ago in another continent is really so relevant to the point of determining their mental health? I can kind of understand cases like the mockery of flat-earthers (well, actually I don't, thinking that the Earth is flat causes no damage to anyone, so why not just let them have their belief instead of starting this whole outrage?), since it's actually possible to verify by yourself that the Earth cannot be flat (for example, by looking at the clouds in the sky or realizing that people in other countries are under different time-zones), but having this same attitude towards something so inexact, imprecise, malleable and distant such as the study of the past is an attestation of arrogance.

"You clearly don't understand how science works, the scientific method is extremely rigorous and scientists have to stand scrutiny from their peers in order to have their findings accepted as factual. If you have doubts about a certain topic you can simply study and verify it by yourself" Ok then, I will study it by myself and come to my own conclusions, but until I'm in my right to have doubts and having them instead of just blindly accepting everything the scientific community says (like, let's be honest, everyone does) doesn't make me intelectually inferior to anyone. However, let's not ignore that it would take me years and years of study to "understans" just one specific topic, that I would still have to just accept as true everything that my peers from the hundreds of other fields say (no, you can't seriously expect someone to specialize on everything in a lifetime, come on) and that even in my own field I would have to assume as true the countless premises that it's based upon (for example, an archeologist has to accept this or that method of dating as the most precise so everything he has learned so far can make sense - this example may not be accurate but I just wanted something to illustrate what I meant)

"Yikes, the Dunning-Kruger is strong on this one. Ok Mr. Nuanced Contrarian, so if all doctors said that taking poison is harmful for your well-being and may possibly culminate in your death but a local charlatan claimed it would give you superpowers then you would take both claims as having the same weight just because you can't verify it by yourself first?" No, I would absolutely stand with the doctors on that one; however, that's not because they are science-people but rather due the fact I know from my own experience that poison is harmful (by seeing all the cases of people who took it and experienced negative effects). So yes, I agree that it's stupid to do certain things when you can verify with YOUR OWN EYES that it won't have a good outcome (not vaccinating your kids, for example)

"We know that science is accurate because it works" Why? Where that implication comes from? Just because a certain institution or group of people creates things that work and improve our lives it doesn't necessarily mean their explanations and theories behind their "inventions" are true; if that is the case then the healers of some amazonian tribe are correct in their beliefs about spirits just because some of their cures are effective?

"If you are so against science then why don't you just drop your phone, leave everything behind and go live in the wilderness?" Again, why? Where that implication comes from? Just because I don't accept as true some explanations of reality that the scientific community come up with it doesn't mean that I think everything related to science is evil and that we should reject all of it's inventions

"You are thinking of scientists as 'the others' when in reality they are just people like you. Also, it would make no sense for scientists to try hiding something from the public when in fact they would receive prestige for exposing the findings of their peers as false" Well, what if they are indeed 'the others'? I mean, who knows? There could be a lobby to push for some agenda or a certain conspiracy to cover something up; this may sound like silly conspirationism but you can't really know for sure. As for the "scientists will seek to disprove their peers instead of covering them up" part, it's just an assumption, there is no reason to say that scientists will necessarily have such mindset; it can be true but it could also be true that anyone who questioned the consensus would risk getting ostracized or even losing their diploma and their source of income - I mean, who knows?

"Science may not have the answers for everything but that doesn't mean your cranky nutjob theories are on the same level of accuracy and respectability" Well, that's a "case by case" situation since there are many different "cranky nutjob theories" out there, but to spare some words and space let's say that such affirmation is mostly true. What then? Just because the alternative theories are wrong it doesn't mean all criticism is invalid. Furthermore, you have to have in mind that different worldviews often come from differing premises and assumptions; science, for instance, is based on methodological naturalism, the assumption the explanation for every topic investigated must be a natural/material/non-supernatural one, while a religious person, for example, takes into account the existence of the divine and thus will likely come up with an alternative and supernatural view of the same phenomenon (what you mockingly label as "goddidit"). Yes, these people have a faith they embrace and because of that they think differently, what's your problem with that? Why can't you just let them be? Oh, I forgot: you guys are desperate for self-affirmation and in constant need of feeling smart and enlightened in comparison to the "cranks, bigots and fundies", right?

J.K. Rowling #transphobia jkrowling.com

This isn’t an easy piece to write, for reasons that will shortly become clear, but I know it’s time to explain myself on an issue surrounded by toxicity. I write this without any desire to add to that toxicity.

For people who don’t know: last December I tweeted my support for Maya Forstater, a tax specialist who’d lost her job for what were deemed ‘transphobic’ tweets. She took her case to an employment tribunal, asking the judge to rule on whether a philosophical belief that sex is determined by biology is protected in law. Judge Tayler ruled that it wasn’t.

My interest in trans issues pre-dated Maya’s case by almost two years, during which I followed the debate around the concept of gender identity closely. I’ve met trans people, and read sundry books, blogs and articles by trans people, gender specialists, intersex people, psychologists, safeguarding experts, social workers and doctors, and followed the discourse online and in traditional media. On one level, my interest in this issue has been professional, because I’m writing a crime series, set in the present day, and my fictional female detective is of an age to be interested in, and affected by, these issues herself, but on another, it’s intensely personal, as I’m about to explain.

All the time I’ve been researching and learning, accusations and threats from trans activists have been bubbling in my Twitter timeline. This was initially triggered by a ‘like’. When I started taking an interest in gender identity and transgender matters, I began screenshotting comments that interested me, as a way of reminding myself what I might want to research later. On one occasion, I absent-mindedly ‘liked’ instead of screenshotting. That single ‘like’ was deemed evidence of wrongthink, and a persistent low level of harassment began.

Months later, I compounded my accidental ‘like’ crime by following Magdalen Burns on Twitter. Magdalen was an immensely brave young feminist and lesbian who was dying of an aggressive brain tumour. I followed her because I wanted to contact her directly, which I succeeded in doing. However, as Magdalen was a great believer in the importance of biological sex, and didn’t believe lesbians should be called bigots for not dating trans women with penises, dots were joined in the heads of twitter trans activists, and the level of social media abuse increased.

I mention all this only to explain that I knew perfectly well what was going to happen when I supported Maya. I must have been on my fourth or fifth cancellation by then. I expected the threats of violence, to be told I was literally killing trans people with my hate, to be called cunt and bitch and, of course, for my books to be burned, although one particularly abusive man told me he’d composted them.

What I didn’t expect in the aftermath of my cancellation was the avalanche of emails and letters that came showering down upon me, the overwhelming majority of which were positive, grateful and supportive. They came from a cross-section of kind, empathetic and intelligent people, some of them working in fields dealing with gender dysphoria and trans people, who’re all deeply concerned about the way a socio-political concept is influencing politics, medical practice and safeguarding. They’re worried about the dangers to young people, gay people and about the erosion of women’s and girl’s rights. Above all, they’re worried about a climate of fear that serves nobody – least of all trans youth – well.

I’d stepped back from Twitter for many months both before and after tweeting support for Maya, because I knew it was doing nothing good for my mental health. I only returned because I wanted to share a free children’s book during the pandemic. Immediately, activists who clearly believe themselves to be good, kind and progressive people swarmed back into my timeline, assuming a right to police my speech, accuse me of hatred, call me misogynistic slurs and, above all – as every woman involved in this debate will know – TERF.

If you didn’t already know – and why should you? – ‘TERF’ is an acronym coined by trans activists, which stands for Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminist. In practice, a huge and diverse cross-section of women are currently being called TERFs and the vast majority have never been radical feminists. Examples of so-called TERFs range from the mother of a gay child who was afraid their child wanted to transition to escape homophobic bullying, to a hitherto totally unfeminist older lady who’s vowed never to visit Marks & Spencer again because they’re allowing any man who says they identify as a woman into the women’s changing rooms. Ironically, radical feminists aren’t even trans-exclusionary – they include trans men in their feminism, because they were born women.

But accusations of TERFery have been sufficient to intimidate many people, institutions and organisations I once admired, who’re cowering before the tactics of the playground. ‘They’ll call us transphobic!’ ‘They’ll say I hate trans people!’ What next, they’ll say you’ve got fleas? Speaking as a biological woman, a lot of people in positions of power really need to grow a pair (which is doubtless literally possible, according to the kind of people who argue that clownfish prove humans aren’t a dimorphic species).

So why am I doing this? Why speak up? Why not quietly do my research and keep my head down?

Well, I’ve got five reasons for being worried about the new trans activism, and deciding I need to speak up.

Firstly, I have a charitable trust that focuses on alleviating social deprivation in Scotland, with a particular emphasis on women and children. Among other things, my trust supports projects for female prisoners and for survivors of domestic and sexual abuse. I also fund medical research into MS, a disease that behaves very differently in men and women. It’s been clear to me for a while that the new trans activism is having (or is likely to have, if all its demands are met) a significant impact on many of the causes I support, because it’s pushing to erode the legal definition of sex and replace it with gender.

The second reason is that I’m an ex-teacher and the founder of a children’s charity, which gives me an interest in both education and safeguarding. Like many others, I have deep concerns about the effect the trans rights movement is having on both.

The third is that, as a much-banned author, I’m interested in freedom of speech and have publicly defended it, even unto Donald Trump.

The fourth is where things start to get truly personal. I’m concerned about the huge explosion in young women wishing to transition and also about the increasing numbers who seem to be detransitioning (returning to their original sex), because they regret taking steps that have, in some cases, altered their bodies irrevocably, and taken away their fertility. Some say they decided to transition after realising they were same-sex attracted, and that transitioning was partly driven by homophobia, either in society or in their families.

Most people probably aren’t aware – I certainly wasn’t, until I started researching this issue properly – that ten years ago, the majority of people wanting to transition to the opposite sex were male. That ratio has now reversed. The UK has experienced a 4400% increase in girls being referred for transitioning treatment. Autistic girls are hugely overrepresented in their numbers.

The same phenomenon has been seen in the US. In 2018, American physician and researcher Lisa Littman set out to explore it. In an interview, she said:

‘Parents online were describing a very unusual pattern of transgender-identification where multiple friends and even entire friend groups became transgender-identified at the same time. I would have been remiss had I not considered social contagion and peer influences as potential factors.’

Littman mentioned Tumblr, Reddit, Instagram and YouTube as contributing factors to Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria, where she believes that in the realm of transgender identification ‘youth have created particularly insular echo chambers.’

Her paper caused a furore. She was accused of bias and of spreading misinformation about transgender people, subjected to a tsunami of abuse and a concerted campaign to discredit both her and her work. The journal took the paper offline and re-reviewed it before republishing it. However, her career took a similar hit to that suffered by Maya Forstater. Lisa Littman had dared challenge one of the central tenets of trans activism, which is that a person’s gender identity is innate, like sexual orientation. Nobody, the activists insisted, could ever be persuaded into being trans.

The argument of many current trans activists is that if you don’t let a gender dysphoric teenager transition, they will kill themselves. In an article explaining why he resigned from the Tavistock (an NHS gender clinic in England) psychiatrist Marcus Evans stated that claims that children will kill themselves if not permitted to transition do not ‘align substantially with any robust data or studies in this area. Nor do they align with the cases I have encountered over decades as a psychotherapist.’

The writings of young trans men reveal a group of notably sensitive and clever people. The more of their accounts of gender dysphoria I’ve read, with their insightful descriptions of anxiety, dissociation, eating disorders, self-harm and self-hatred, the more I’ve wondered whether, if I’d been born 30 years later, I too might have tried to transition. The allure of escaping womanhood would have been huge. I struggled with severe OCD as a teenager. If I’d found community and sympathy online that I couldn’t find in my immediate environment, I believe I could have been persuaded to turn myself into the son my father had openly said he’d have preferred.

When I read about the theory of gender identity, I remember how mentally sexless I felt in youth. I remember Colette’s description of herself as a ‘mental hermaphrodite’ and Simone de Beauvoir’s words: ‘It is perfectly natural for the future woman to feel indignant at the limitations posed upon her by her sex. The real question is not why she should reject them: the problem is rather to understand why she accepts them.’

As I didn’t have a realistic possibility of becoming a man back in the 1980s, it had to be books and music that got me through both my mental health issues and the sexualised scrutiny and judgement that sets so many girls to war against their bodies in their teens. Fortunately for me, I found my own sense of otherness, and my ambivalence about being a woman, reflected in the work of female writers and musicians who reassured me that, in spite of everything a sexist world tries to throw at the female-bodied, it’s fine not to feel pink, frilly and compliant inside your own head; it’s OK to feel confused, dark, both sexual and non-sexual, unsure of what or who you are.

I want to be very clear here: I know transition will be a solution for some gender dysphoric people, although I’m also aware through extensive research that studies have consistently shown that between 60-90% of gender dysphoric teens will grow out of their dysphoria. Again and again I’ve been told to ‘just meet some trans people.’ I have: in addition to a few younger people, who were all adorable, I happen to know a self-described transsexual woman who’s older than I am and wonderful. Although she’s open about her past as a gay man, I’ve always found it hard to think of her as anything other than a woman, and I believe (and certainly hope) she’s completely happy to have transitioned. Being older, though, she went through a long and rigorous process of evaluation, psychotherapy and staged transformation. The current explosion of trans activism is urging a removal of almost all the robust systems through which candidates for sex reassignment were once required to pass. A man who intends to have no surgery and take no hormones may now secure himself a Gender Recognition Certificate and be a woman in the sight of the law. Many people aren’t aware of this.

We’re living through the most misogynistic period I’ve experienced. Back in the 80s, I imagined that my future daughters, should I have any, would have it far better than I ever did, but between the backlash against feminism and a porn-saturated online culture, I believe things have got significantly worse for girls. Never have I seen women denigrated and dehumanised to the extent they are now. From the leader of the free world’s long history of sexual assault accusations and his proud boast of ‘grabbing them by the pussy’, to the incel (‘involuntarily celibate’) movement that rages against women who won’t give them sex, to the trans activists who declare that TERFs need punching and re-educating, men across the political spectrum seem to agree: women are asking for trouble. Everywhere, women are being told to shut up and sit down, or else.

I’ve read all the arguments about femaleness not residing in the sexed body, and the assertions that biological women don’t have common experiences, and I find them, too, deeply misogynistic and regressive. It’s also clear that one of the objectives of denying the importance of sex is to erode what some seem to see as the cruelly segregationist idea of women having their own biological realities or – just as threatening – unifying realities that make them a cohesive political class. The hundreds of emails I’ve received in the last few days prove this erosion concerns many others just as much. It isn’t enough for women to be trans allies. Women must accept and admit that there is no material difference between trans women and themselves.

But, as many women have said before me, ‘woman’ is not a costume. ‘Woman’ is not an idea in a man’s head. ‘Woman’ is not a pink brain, a liking for Jimmy Choos or any of the other sexist ideas now somehow touted as progressive. Moreover, the ‘inclusive’ language that calls female people ‘menstruators’ and ‘people with vulvas’ strikes many women as dehumanising and demeaning. I understand why trans activists consider this language to be appropriate and kind, but for those of us who’ve had degrading slurs spat at us by violent men, it’s not neutral, it’s hostile and alienating.

Which brings me to the fifth reason I’m deeply concerned about the consequences of the current trans activism.

I’ve been in the public eye now for over twenty years and have never talked publicly about being a domestic abuse and sexual assault survivor. This isn’t because I’m ashamed those things happened to me, but because they’re traumatic to revisit and remember. I also feel protective of my daughter from my first marriage. I didn’t want to claim sole ownership of a story that belongs to her, too. However, a short while ago, I asked her how she’d feel if I were publicly honest about that part of my life, and she encouraged me to go ahead.

I’m mentioning these things now not in an attempt to garner sympathy, but out of solidarity with the huge numbers of women who have histories like mine, who’ve been slurred as bigots for having concerns around single-sex spaces.

I managed to escape my first violent marriage with some difficulty, but I’m now married to a truly good and principled man, safe and secure in ways I never in a million years expected to be. However, the scars left by violence and sexual assault don’t disappear, no matter how loved you are, and no matter how much money you’ve made. My perennial jumpiness is a family joke – and even I know it’s funny – but I pray my daughters never have the same reasons I do for hating sudden loud noises, or finding people behind me when I haven’t heard them approaching.

If you could come inside my head and understand what I feel when I read about a trans woman dying at the hands of a violent man, you’d find solidarity and kinship. I have a visceral sense of the terror in which those trans women will have spent their last seconds on earth, because I too have known moments of blind fear when I realised that the only thing keeping me alive was the shaky self-restraint of my attacker.

I believe the majority of trans-identified people not only pose zero threat to others, but are vulnerable for all the reasons I’ve outlined. Trans people need and deserve protection. Like women, they’re most likely to be killed by sexual partners. Trans women who work in the sex industry, particularly trans women of colour, are at particular risk. Like every other domestic abuse and sexual assault survivor I know, I feel nothing but empathy and solidarity with trans women who’ve been abused by men.

So I want trans women to be safe. At the same time, I do not want to make natal girls and women less safe. When you throw open the doors of bathrooms and changing rooms to any man who believes or feels he’s a woman – and, as I’ve said, gender confirmation certificates may now be granted without any need for surgery or hormones – then you open the door to any and all men who wish to come inside. That is the simple truth.

On Saturday morning, I read that the Scottish government is proceeding with its controversial gender recognition plans, which will in effect mean that all a man needs to ‘become a woman’ is to say he’s one. To use a very contemporary word, I was ‘triggered’. Ground down by the relentless attacks from trans activists on social media, when I was only there to give children feedback about pictures they’d drawn for my book under lockdown, I spent much of Saturday in a very dark place inside my head, as memories of a serious sexual assault I suffered in my twenties recurred on a loop. That assault happened at a time and in a space where I was vulnerable, and a man capitalised on an opportunity. I couldn’t shut out those memories and I was finding it hard to contain my anger and disappointment about the way I believe my government is playing fast and loose with womens and girls’ safety.

Late on Saturday evening, scrolling through children’s pictures before I went to bed, I forgot the first rule of Twitter – never, ever expect a nuanced conversation – and reacted to what I felt was degrading language about women. I spoke up about the importance of sex and have been paying the price ever since. I was transphobic, I was a cunt, a bitch, a TERF, I deserved cancelling, punching and death. You are Voldemort said one person, clearly feeling this was the only language I’d understand.

It would be so much easier to tweet the approved hashtags – because of course trans rights are human rights and of course trans lives matter – scoop up the woke cookies and bask in a virtue-signalling afterglow. There’s joy, relief and safety in conformity. As Simone de Beauvoir also wrote, “… without a doubt it is more comfortable to endure blind bondage than to work for one’s liberation; the dead, too, are better suited to the earth than the living.”

Huge numbers of women are justifiably terrified by the trans activists; I know this because so many have got in touch with me to tell their stories. They’re afraid of doxxing, of losing their jobs or their livelihoods, and of violence.

But endlessly unpleasant as its constant targeting of me has been, I refuse to bow down to a movement that I believe is doing demonstrable harm in seeking to erode ‘woman’ as a political and biological class and offering cover to predators like few before it. I stand alongside the brave women and men, gay, straight and trans, who’re standing up for freedom of speech and thought, and for the rights and safety of some of the most vulnerable in our society: young gay kids, fragile teenagers, and women who’re reliant on and wish to retain their single sex spaces. Polls show those women are in the vast majority, and exclude only those privileged or lucky enough never to have come up against male violence or sexual assault, and who’ve never troubled to educate themselves on how prevalent it is.

The one thing that gives me hope is that the women who can protest and organise, are doing so, and they have some truly decent men and trans people alongside them. Political parties seeking to appease the loudest voices in this debate are ignoring women’s concerns at their peril. In the UK, women are reaching out to each other across party lines, concerned about the erosion of their hard-won rights and widespread intimidation. None of the gender critical women I’ve talked to hates trans people; on the contrary. Many of them became interested in this issue in the first place out of concern for trans youth, and they’re hugely sympathetic towards trans adults who simply want to live their lives, but who’re facing a backlash for a brand of activism they don’t endorse. The supreme irony is that the attempt to silence women with the word ‘TERF’ may have pushed more young women towards radical feminism than the movement’s seen in decades.

The last thing I want to say is this. I haven’t written this essay in the hope that anybody will get out a violin for me, not even a teeny-weeny one. I’m extraordinarily fortunate; I’m a survivor, certainly not a victim. I’ve only mentioned my past because, like every other human being on this planet, I have a complex backstory, which shapes my fears, my interests and my opinions. I never forget that inner complexity when I’m creating a fictional character and I certainly never forget it when it comes to trans people.

All I’m asking – all I want – is for similar empathy, similar understanding, to be extended to the many millions of women whose sole crime is wanting their concerns to be heard without receiving threats and abuse.

Dave Armstrong #fundie ncregister.com

Atheists Seem to Have Almost a Childlike Faith in the Omnipotence of Atoms.

The natural “laws” that we observe somehow attained their remarkable organizing abilities. One either explains them by natural laws or by humbly bowing to divine teleology at some point, as an explanation every bit as plausible as materialism (everything being supposedly “explained” by purely material processes).

Matter essentially “becomes god” in the atheist/materialist view; it has the inherent ability to do everything by itself: a power that Christians believe God caused, by putting these potentialities and actual characteristics into matter and natural laws, as their ultimate Creator and ongoing Preserver and Sustainer.

The atheist places extraordinary faith in matter – arguably far more faith than we place in God, because it is much more difficult to explain everything that god-matter does by science alone.

Indeed, this is a faith of a non-rational, almost childlike kind. It is quite humorous, then, to observe the constant charge that we Christians are the ones who have a blind, “fairy tale,” gullible, faith, as opposed to self-described “rational, intellectual, sophisticated” atheists.

Atheistic belief is [see my explanatory “disclaimer” at the end] a kind of polytheistic idolatry of the crudest, most primitive sort, putting to shame the colorful worship of the ancient Babylonians, Philistines, Aztecs, and other groups. They believed that their silver amulets and wooden idols could make the sun shine or defeat an enemy or cause crops to flourish.

The polytheistic materialist, on the other hand, is far more religious than that. He thinks that trillions of his atom-gods and their distant relatives, the cell-gods, can make absolutely everything in the universe occur, by their own power, possessed eternally either in full or (who knows how?) in inevitably unfolding potentiality.

One might call this (to coin a phrase) Atomism (“belief that the atom is God”). Trillions of omnipotent, omniscient atoms can do absolutely everything that the Christian God can do, and for little or no reason that anyone can understand (i.e., why and how the atom-god came to possess such powers in the first place). The Atomist openly and unreservedly worships his trillions of gods, with the most perfect, trusting, non-rational faith imaginable. He or she is what sociologists call a “true believer.”

Oh, and we mustn’t forget the time-goddess. She is often invoked in reverential, awe-inspiring terms as the be-all, end-all explanation for things inexplicable, as if by magic her very incantation rises to an explanatory level sufficient to silence any silly Christian, who is foolish enough to believe in one God rather than trillions. The time-goddess is the highest in the ranks of the Atomist’s varied hierarchy of gods (sort of the “Zeus” of Atomism). We may entitle this belief Temporalism.

Atomism is a strong, fortress-like faith. It is often said that it “must be” what it is. The Atomist reverses the error of the Gnostic heretics. They thought spirit was great and that matter was evil. Atomists think matter is great (and god) and spirit is not only “evil” (metaphorically speaking), but beyond that: non-existent.

Atomists may and do differ on secondary issues, just as the various ancient polytheistic cultures differed on quibbling details (which god could do what, which material made for a better idol, etc.), but despite all, they inevitably came out on the side of polytheistic idolatry, with crude material gods, and against spiritual monotheism.

Yet in Atomism, each person is a god, too, because he is made up of trillions of atom-gods and cell-gods. When you get trillions of gods all together in one place, it stands to reason that they can corporately perceive the order of which any one of them individually is capable of producing.

Within the Atomist faith-paradigm, this make perfect sense. But for one outside their circle of religious faith, it may not (devout, faithful Atomist need to realize that others of different faiths may not think such things as “obvious” as they do). The Atomist – ever imaginative – manages to believe any number of things, in faith, without the “unnecessary” addition of mere explanation.

“Why” questions in the context of Atomism are senseless, because they can’t overcome the Impenetrable Fortress of blind faith that the Atomist possesses. The question, “Why do the atom-gods and cell-gods and the time-goddess exist and possess the extraordinary powers that they do?” is meaningless and ought not be put forth. It’s bad form, and impolite. We know how sensitive overly religious folk are.

Instead, we are asked to bow to the countless mysteries of Atomism in dumbstruck, awed silence, like the Magi at the baby Jesus’ manger, offering our unquestioning “scientific” and “philosophical” allegiance like they offered gold and frankincense and myrrh. The very inquiry is regarded as senseless and “intrusive.”

We can’t help — almost despite ourselves — recalling with fondness the wonders and fairy-tales of childhood. Atomists are (we might say) the “adult children” among us: like Peter Pan!

Who can resist Peter Pan, after all? This (arguably) gives them their charm and appeal: evident in so many Christian discussion threads online, where they suddenly enter and — seemingly oblivious to the existing discussion — start incongruously preaching their rather fantastic fideistic faith.

In a certain remote and limited sense, we Christians (since we value faith) stand in awe of such Pure Faith, with its sublime fideism and Absolute Trust in Design via trillions of atom-gods. It is, indeed, an ingenious, even elegant system, admirable in its bold, brilliant intellectual audacity, if nothing else.

Like much of modern philosophy, however, at bottom it is hopelessly irrational, self-defeating, and ultimately incoherent. For that reason, the Christian must reject it, since we believe that self-contradictory beliefs are untrue and unworthy of anyone’s allegiance.

Note: the above article is an exercise of what is known in logic and philosophical discourse as reductio ad absurdum: illustrating the absurd by being absurd, and taking things to their logical conclusions. It is humorous, satirical, and also an example of the argumentative technique of “turning the tables.” But the underlying point I am trying to make is assuredly dead serious.

James Miller #sexist returnofkings.com

The Case For Gendo-Nationalism
image
James Miller is a political strategist and policy intellectual from New York City. He is the founder and president of the James Miller Foundation.

The alt-right and their leaders have often stressed the need for the establishment of a ethno-state on the North American continent. While I can understand many of their concerns as a middle-class white guy who lives in a gated community in the suburbs of New York City, I honestly do not have to deal with the minority problem on a day to day basis.

Whether the Bronx is being flooded with new arrivals is simply not my problem. Thots, on the other hand, affect us wherever we live. It doesn’t matter how great your neighborhood is or even how religious your state is. America has become a degenerate nation, and thottery has pervaded all aspects of American life—Northern and Southern, Protestant and Catholic, conservative and liberal, normie and alt-right.

image
A thot prepares to flash her breasts to a crowd of onlookers in a ‘conservative’ state in the Deep South.

Traditionalism Is Hopeless

Many on the right advocate for traditionalism. They think we can just return to the days of a nuclear family, reverse all three waves of feminism, and let women assume their traditional role. While I respect the arguments made by traditionalists, I have concluded that any sort of rollback is now politically impossible in the United States. We have lost the culture war. There is no going back. Sure, you can flee to a country where remnants of traditionalism still exist, but they are merely a little further back on the ongoing global shift towards female ‘liberation’ and the dissolution of family life.

Furthermore, while this problem has been substantially amplified in recent years, it is certainly not a modern one. Thots have consistently been the downfall of powerful men throughout history. John F. Kennedy was compromised by the Soviet Union as a result of depraved female temptresses. Even Adolf Hitler’s defeat in the Second World War can be attributed largely to the presence of Eva Braun. Cleopatra’s betrayal of Mark Antony the moment a more alpha chad arrived on the scene surely serves as one of the clearest demonstrations of the subversion of the opposite sex.

Richard Spencer similarly and correctly recognizes a return to the days of actual white supremacy is impossible and undesirable, and instead advocates for a white ethno-state, building on the momentum of left-wing identity politics movements. Although I respectfully disagree with him on that issue, his fundamental analysis is correct. We cannot return to an undefined point in the past when things were somehow better on the issues that we care about. All we can do is seek to influence the future. I have thus come to the conclusion that the only solution to our current thot debacle is peaceful separation between the sexes, and a resulting male gendo-state.

Now, this notion may sound absurd. Most traditionalists love and respect women, and simply wish for them to return to their historical place in society, rather than be done away with altogether. They must come to understand that separation has now become a necessity.

image
We may reach the point of open conflict with the opposing gender.

Separation Is Necessary

Cultural feminism has degraded women to the point where co-existence is a net negative to males. Women weaken men by their very presence, co-opting and hijacking even traditionalist movements by embracing the rhetoric and yet leaving much to be desired in terms of the personal example they set.

As the last few weeks have shown, women are able to completely destroy the reputations of decent, upstanding men through false accusations of sexual abuse. Women compete with us in a job market that is rigged against us by politicians who have come to see women as an essential voting bloc to appease. Women now even proudly declare that they do not need or want men in their lives.

Why don’t we put that to the test? Let us see how well the opposing gender fares when left completely to their own devices. In this way, we could use the rise of feminism as force of acceleration in order to promote our bid for nationhood. It is ironically fairly likely that the world’s first gendo-state will consist of pink haired female ogres LARPing as Amazons. But once the precedent is set, males will have a unique opportunity to seize the moment and build the case for our secession.

The Vision

Gendo-nationalism would involve near-total separation between men and women. A physical border would be erected between the respective male and female nation-states, and travel between these gendo-states would be tightly controlled and require permission from the governing authority of the gendo-state being entered. In the male gendo-state, which I have little doubt will be far more successful than its female competitor, male chauvinism will be the zeitgeist of the new order.

In addition, we need to think about the only real thing we need women for—sex. Advancements in robotics in recent years are quickly making this need obsolete. Future improvements in cloning technology may even allow us to replace women for the purposes of reproduction. Until the point at which a solution is devised, the gendo-state could have a work visa system which prostitutes and surrogates could utilize without permanent settlement in our new nation.

image
Soon, we will no longer need women to lead fulfilling sex lives.

The Path Ahead

Before we can have separation, we need to have a general sense of male identity. Now, I believe this to an extent to be inherent and hardwired, hence the presence of so many all-male social groups in our society. Nevertheless, we must promote the importance of masculinity and push close identification with our gender’s collective interests as a component of that.

Subsequently, we need to urge our fellow men to gradually start removing all emotional attachment to women. They’re to be seen as a tool, not a crutch. Emotional attachment makes men the weaker sex because women are inherently able to exploit it, and ensures the perpetuation of the anti-male status quo. Once it is overcome, the foundations for a gendo-state can be laid.

Free from the shackles of womankind, men will be able to embrace their true potential. We will have hours more in our days which would otherwise be wasted on entertaining vacuous thots. We will no longer be treated like second class citizens in the very nations we built and shed our blood for. Our inherent physical and mental supremacy will give us a substantial edge in the world marketplace. Much as ethno-nationalist movements played a major role in defining the 20th century, my hope is that gendo-nationalism will define the 21st.

Roy Batty #psycho dailystormer.name

[From "Cambodia Inspired by Duterte’s Example, Threatens to Send Back Trash as Well!"]

Liberals like to talk about and fantasize about strategies to get the Third World to rise up and throw off the shackles of evil Western corporations and all that Dances With Wolves noble savage inspired shit.

But, obviously, only an unrepentant strongman could confront the West and institute a greener, more environmentally-friendly policy.

Now, other countries are inspired by his example and beginning to do the same!

RT

Cambodia will return 83 shipping containers loaded with plastic waste to the United States and Canada, the country’s Environment Ministry has announced. The move comes as Southeast Asia tires of accepting the west’s refuse.

[...]

I’ve always had a soft spot for Cambodia because it had the 20th century’s most misunderstood leader, Pol Pot, running the show for a bit. Being a true man of the people, Pol Pot got fed up with the decadent and corrupt elites of Cambodia that preferred Liberalism and caviar to Communism and rice soup, and just decided to fucking man up and kill them all.

Perhaps his measures were a bit extreme… but then again, perhaps they weren’t.

We don’t really know how bad the situation in Cambodia was at the time that Pol Pot decided that everyone needed to become a rice farmer again and stop living like bugmen in city slums.

Perhaps Pol Pot was more akin to a cleansing force of nature than to a politician.

Furthermore: who is to say that we ourselves wouldn’t benefit from a new Pol Pot in the West now?

Just imagine the death march of 6 million soy-addled Millennials forced out of Brooklyn and dropped into Montana. They would be given a choice: become a cowboy or die, and then left to their own devices. One or two generations down the line, you’d have healthy assimilated communities in full genetic, hormonal and cultural recovery… and about 5 million corpses.

Frankly, I think it is a price that most people would be willing to pay. Having big-city liberals death-marched into the country and given the chance to start being productive members of society is a plan that all positions of the non-liberal political spectrum could get behind.

Furthermore, a Western Pol Pot could just shut down every single mega-corp and outlaw plastic forever. That way, there would be no more trash to send to Cambodia or dump in the ocean.

It would be a win-win for everybody!

Since we’re going to become more like the Third World demographically, perhaps we can borrow some of their more successful social experiments and implement them in the West as well!

Levi Quackenboss #conspiracy #quack patreon.com

[From "Seven Silver Linings of the Pandemic"]

A few weeks ago, as I was desperately looking for an upside to a national shutdown, a post about the Earth healing from pollution came my way. The world’s air was cleaner, the water was getting clearer. That was nice, I suppose. That was something to hold on to in such a crap situation. And then people finally started washing their hands for the first time in their lives, which was a miracle in itself, hopefully that habit will stay. Then homeschooling and homebirth came to the masses; both significant sub-movements of the health freedom and parental rights movement. As long as one has money to put food on the table, it’s lovely being home in the evening to go on a sunset walk and read books to your kids and tuck them into bed.

I try to hold onto these thoughts because this shutdown has been more divisive—in my personal life and in this community of ours— than the 2016 election. I have felt friendships die. I have read accusations that I don't think I'll ever get over.

But it’s been three weeks now and I’m happy to report that my relentless optimism has bounced back three-fold on this wild ride, and I want to give you all my seven major pandemic wins to bounce around in your brains while you wander from your pantry to the sofa and back to the pantry again.

[...]

3. Infants are missing vaccination appointments and SIDS rates are dropping.

Not every infant, don’t get me wrong. Pediatricians are doing a full court press begging new parents to keep their “well baby” appointments as an essential reason to leave the houses. Do you remember what it was like to have a two-month-old in your house? Would you have taken your precious baby to a doctor during a pandemic? Me neither.

Some will, some won’t, but here are the facts: 3,500 babies die of SIDS each year. That’s almost 10 babies lost per day, every day of the week. If half of all new American parents skip the two or four-month vaccination appointment from March 15 to May 1, that’s 221 babies who don’t die in those 45 days. If more than half skip, that’s more babies who don’t die. If all parents skip, it’s 442 babies saved in six weeks.

[...]

4. The Average Joe is facing mandatory vaccination and it doesn’t look good for the CDC.

The numbers of our movement are about to increase exponentially if states attempt to require this dangerous vaccine. We’ve all seen Paul Offit, Ian Lipkin, Peter Hotez, and finally Anthony Fauci himself warning the public about the “paradoxical immune enhancement” caused by an early version of the coronavirus vaccine, which is a common reaction with respiratory virus vaccines. It means that if the vaccinated person encounters the virus in the wild, they get far sicker than average, and die. Who the hell wants that vaccine?

[...]

Then what will happen if people are hurt or killed by this coronavirus vaccine immune enhancement phenomenon? The entire vaccination program will implode, just like it did in the Philippines after the dengue disaster—that’s the only reason Paul Offit is losing his mind over fast-tracking this vaccine.

5. The Gates Foundation got exposed conducting tobacco science.

We all know that science has been for sale for decades, but this revelation couldn’t have come at a better time. The Gates Foundation is conducting a study on people sickened with COVID-19, to see whether hydroxychloroquine, the darling of the pandemic, is more effective than a placebo at saving lives. But guess what the placebo is? It’s vitamin C, which is, in itself, has been a successful COVID-19 treatment! Gates has all of his eggs in the vaccine basket, naturally, and is attempting to defeat hydroxychloroquine in the media, so stay tuned for the results of his study to be released in a few weeks or months.

[...]

6. Immunity badges are going to destroy the adult vaccination tracking system.

Surely you’ve seen this outrageous Bill Gates idea being parroted in our Congress: people are supposed to IgG test for past COVID-19 infections, and then obtain “certificates of immunity” or “immunity badges” before being allowed to return to work “with confidence.”

[...]

7. America is learning the importance of not eliminating the control group from the population.

How often have we said that states like California and New York have eliminated exemptions in attempt to eliminate our healthy control group from society? A parallel story is playing out in Arkansas, Iowa, Nebraska, South Dakota, North Dakota, and even in Sweden and Belarus. They have refused to lock down, not that most people aren’t taking the virus seriously. The seriousness of the situation isn’t the issue; stripping people of their freedoms is the issue.

But the "control group" is why you see the media screaming about how the center of America isn’t threatening their citizens enough. It started with Bill Gates a few days ago, and was quickly picked up by his minions.

platinumgoldstarlesbians #sexist platinumgoldstarlesbians.tumblr.com

(Just out of curiosity, why do you feel the need to differentiate between lesbians and gold star lesbians? Why does it make you so angry that women who have had sex with men have the same right as a "gold star" like you to identify as a lesbian? Is it a superiority thing? Do you think you're better than those women? I really want to know why you put so much energy into something as trivial as this. )

First of all, it is not a trivial thing. Maybe to you non gold stars but to most gold star lesbians it is not trivial. Gold Star lesbian means a lesbian who has never willingly slept with a man or boy. Where in the definition does it say that gold star lesbians think they are superior to other lesbians? Rape victims can be gold stars lesbians because it implies consensual sex not rape. The term gold star used to be a slur. “Lesbians” who had or are sleeping with men made fun of and insulted lesbians who have never and will never sleep with men willingly by saying something like this, “oh, so you have never slept with a man? So now what do you want? A gold star!?” So these lesbians eventually got sick of it and decided to reclaim the word for themselves thus the gold star lesbian. The “lesbians” and their supporters who made fun of them and future supporters who will hate the term and/or definition of the term or/and the actual gold star lesbians are forever pissed of and will do anything to silence us and make us look bad. I think it was never about the term, it was and is about the definition of the term because they are other offensive terms such as pillow princess and dyke and slut that no one is making a fuss over and even if they do people ignore it. I think these people who are antigold stars just can’t stand and comprehend how a woman has not and will not willingly have sex with men and they are pissed of because they and everyone expect every woman to sleep with a man at least once in her lifetime. I view antigold stars to be mysoginistic and homophobic. I care because it puts a really bad reputation on real lesbians. Gold star lesbians have face the same compulsory heterosexuality just like the “lesbians” who have slept with men. There is only one type of lesbian and it is a biological woman who is sexually, emotionally, romantically, and physically attracted to ONLY other biological women. By that definition lesbians don’t willingly have sex with men. Also, they are many ways to avoid having sex with men when you are faced with expectations to sleep with them unless you live in a country like Afghanistan where who are basically raped and force to do things. The only excuse that I hear of why a “lesbian” slept with a man willingly is because compulsorary heterosexuality but there excuse is not valid because gold star lesbians face the same challenges as they do. Actually they have more of a challenge and are at more of a risk because they have never and will never sleep with men willingly and society expects women to have sex with men. Gold Star lesbians are not “lucky” they are just following their lesbianism. These “lesbians” who have slept and/or are sleeping with men make lesbians a huge joke to the mayority, the straight people. Those “lesbians” reinforce the stereotype that lesbians can have sex with men willingly, it is just a phase, they will end up with men, they can be “turn”, etc. The word lesbian has been changed (not by the dictionary but by what people connote it to) to mean a woman who had sex with men but now has sex with women. I don’t even like to call myself lesbian because people especially the LGBTQ will assume that I have slept with men which is not true. So I call myself gold star lesbian and this clearly states that I have never and will never sleep with men. The term lesbian has been changed to be ambiguous meaning that it can mean anything even the bisexuals claim the word lesbians. The point is to distinguish the “lesbians” who had and/or have sex with men from the lesbians who has never and will never willingly sleep with a man. After all, who do you think a person who wants to learn about lesbians will take more seriously, a “lesbian” who has slept or/and is sleeping with men or a lesbian who has never and will never sleep with men? I care because you antigold star lesbians are silencing us and expect us to be viewed as manfuckers like every other “lesbian”. It is just a term and because antigold stars are making a huge fuss over it I assume you all are homophobic. Plus, why do the “lesbians” who have had sex with men get a voice while lesbians who never slept with men need to shut the fuck up by the antigold star lesbians? It is antigold stars who make a huge fuss about the term and put bullshit lies in our mouths such as we don’t let rape victims be gold stars (most gold stars would agree that they can be gold stars). We gold stars are just defending ourselves from your homophobic bullshit.

(Hi, so there are many issues with your argument:

1) I think it’s funny how you assumed that I am a “non gold star” lesbian just because I have a problem with your perspective. To use your language, I am in fact a “platinum gold star” lesbian. My current girlfriend was my first kiss :)

2) The term “gold star” lesbian is not a slur. The response “oh, so you have never slept with a man? So now what do you want? A gold star!?” probably came after your insufferable and needless bragging about never having been with a “biological male”, which by the way, is transphobic. I’m not surprised that you’re a terf. A sarcastic comeback is not the same as a slur. The term “dyke” is used when I’m being threatened from across the street by a group of men for holding my girlfriend’s hand. No one cares if I’m a gold star or not.

3) You assume IMMENSE amounts of privilege when talking about being a gold star lesbian. I come from a country where there was absolutely NO LGBT representation. On top of that, my family was very religious and conservative. Heterosexual sex wasn’t even discussed or represented without religious warnings and limitations, i.e. only when you’re married, etc. I have had feelings for women for as long as I could remember, but due to my young inability to comprehend what I was feeling, I continued to identify as straight. After all, I had no point of reference, so how could I identify as something I didn’t even know was an option? You don’t have to be in Afghanistan being murdered or raped to deal with compulsory heterosexuality. If I had remained in my country, I would have probably ended up in a casually arranged marriage courtesy of my parents, distant relatives, and family friends. I know for a fact that I would also have just accepted and went along with the marriage, as I would have wanted to please my family. It would have probably been a close childhood friend of mine and we could just continue to be best friends after the marriage, just with occasional sex thrown in. Would I have been enthusiastic about the sex? Maybe not, but since I would have had no point of reference, chances are that I would have just went along with it to please my husband. No big deal, right? Except that in this scenario, I’m gay and I just don’t know it.

P.S. this situation isn’t completely hypothetical, I know a few of my parents’ friends that had me lined up as an option for their sons.

What I’m trying to show you is that there is nuance to being a lesbian. Nothing is just black and white. A lesbian is a woman (cis or trans) that is attracted solely to women. Therefore, I am a lesbian, just as much as my girlfriend, @tinylesbian, who has been involved with men for means of safety and survival.

4) The differentiation of platinum/gold star lesbians vs lesbians who have been involved with men in the past creates a hierarchy and is not helpful nor conducive to a supportive lesbian community. Bragging about never having been with a “biological male” (still transphobic) should not be a point of pride as it insinuates that you are somehow more of a lesbian than women who have and honestly, it’s just unnecessary information. We don’t care. No one does.)

There are gold stars and platinum lesbians who disagree with the label and I know that but most of them that complain about the label are the ones who sleep or have slept with men. Personally, I don’t like the term because it implies something better but no one including the haters have tried to come up with a new neutral term. Transexuals can’t be lesbians because I follow science. I suppose I am a TERF but I don’t call myself that because I find it offensive. The term may not have been a slur but it obviously was used to offend the gold star lesbians. I do agree that Afghanistan is not the only place that you can get raped and murdered for being LGBTQ. Unfortunately, even the U.S. has problems with murder and rape. However, as a society you can get help if you are raped and the rapist will get punished if he or she is reported but unfortunately some countries don’t have that. I in fact am a platinum lesbian. Despite that I had tried to be straight and tried to like boys in my teenaged years but it didn’t work and never got a boyfriend or any fuckboys coming after me (probably because of my social issues). Plus, I just couldn’t bring myself to have sex with males because to me it felt like I was going to sleep with an animal. It just wasn’t for me and my extincts just said no. I also tried commiting suicide a couple of times. But just because I am a platinum lesbian doesnt means that I had an easy life and that I and other gold star and platinum lesbians should be ignored and silenced. Most of us gold star and platinum lesbians have not had an easy life and we didn’t go have sex with men to make it easier and plus it is not in our nature. I totally disagree that lesbianism is nuanced. If lesbianism is nuanced, what about straight people are they nuanced and not black and white? The lesbian community is a huge joke (at least the ones I have been to) and it is not because of gold star and platinum lesbians. It is because of “lesbians” and bisexuals who can’t shut the hell up about men whether how it was good or bad having sex with them, how to unlearn liking men, divorces, marriages, children with men, etc. I expected a community of lesbians who talked only about women and not a thing about men (relating to sexual or romantic). Plus, the hate and bullying towards and silencing of lesbians who have never slept with men by the antigold stars and antiplatinums is unbelievable. Sometimes they even ban you from the place if you have never slept with men. I don’t involve myself in the lesbian community or LGBTQ community anymore and only seek other gold star or platinum lesbians to date. You and only people with your mentality may not care about the term but why the hell do you and others think you have the right to tell us what we can and cannot call ourselves and judge us when they are many bisexuals who mislabel themselves as lesbians and make a joke out of us? One of the reasons why we are loud and vocal is because people like you want to silence us and most people don’t want to be silenced. Also, we want to be role models to young lesbians to show them that they don’t have to sleep with a men to make sure they are lesbians or to be proper lesbians. I will respect your opinions despite that I disagree with them and I hope you respect mine despite you disagreeing with me. And then we call it quits.

Chris Burnett #conspiracy counterpunch.org

Why Star Wars: “The Force Awakens” is a Parable That Supports US Empire

Just about everything in the new Star Wars film, The Force Awakens, is hard to believe, I mean, at least in terms of consistency. The plot is full of holes, but older Star Wars fans are willing to suspend disbelief for that warm and fuzzy feeling of childhood regression. Myself included. But in our modern day screen culture that is the US, where we sell wars and elections like toothpaste, I suppose suspension of disbelief is a daily occurrence.

People want to believe. The corporate culture produces “just war” narratives to satisfy an insatiable appetite for violence, exactly what Star Wars delivers, except this time, I would argue, it’s been turned upside down in the service of a real empire: The US Empire.

I am not saying that The Force Awakens was intentionally made as an imperial piece of propaganda for US wars, but it’s hard not to make the connections between Disney’s history of racism and xenophobia, the total absence of the Dark Side’s politics (other than ISIS like nihilism), and the way in which the “good guys” are always innocent and being attacked by an evil force that literally hates their freedom. The Dark Side in The Force Awakens is reconstituted as The First Order that explicitly engages in an act of mass terrorism to destroy the Republic, i.e democracy.

On a positive side, the actors playing the parts of Ren, Rey, Finn and Poe were excellent. The toned down use of CGI is a plus, and the landscape shots and the sets of The First Order were impressive. This thing was even shot on 35mm film!

Don’t get me wrong, I love Sci-Fi, but I am far more interested in deeper, radical socio-political-economic narratives you would find in the writings of Iain Banks or Kim Stanley Robinson. Star Wars is a kids movie, but I can’t help but see this new film as cynical in light of our current political climate. It’s reactionary in a way that strengthens current myths in our endless “war on terrorism”.

The Force Awakens (TFA) is weirdly post-post-modernist in that it kind of eschews skepticism, and embraces a kind of hopeful cluelessness. Indeed, the original film was made in the 70’s coming off of a massive cultural and political rebellion. The US just lost it’s first war after an illegal and immoral invasion of Vietnam. Corruption was in your face with Watergate and the Church Committee hearings.

You could easily identify with the rebel message of the original Star Wars as a fight against an unjust system. Stormtroopers were seen as either Hitler’s SS or riot cops bashing student heads, depending on your point of view. Today, 14 years into the Neo-cons endless war against independent states in the Middle East completely recasts the context for any war movie.

Terrorism has replaced communism as the existential threat to the US. It’s a very useful propaganda tool for justifying large military budgets, illegal invasions, illegal assassinations, illegal spying, illegal detentions, and a shredding of the US Constitution. Real war planners don’t really believe terrorism is a threat at all, in terms of an actual challenge to state power.

Non-state actors like Al Qaeda and ISIS don’t kill anywhere near the numbers that their state counterparts do. Industrial state terrorism like that conducted by the US in Iraq and Libya have murdered millions of innocents. And by definition, terrorism is the use of violence against civilians to advance a political cause. That definition applies equally to both retail (non-states) and wholesale (states) terrorists.

In TFA, it’s clear The First Order doesn’t want to take state power, unlike their previous counterparts: Darth Vader and the Emperor. Their goal is total destruction, total domination and total obedience, an existential threat of, literally, the first order. They are terrorists by definition.

With TFA, you can almost see how this warped world we have arrived at in 2015 could remake the original and interpret the Rebels as US soldiers fighting cult-like fascists with no politics other than nihilism (aka ISIS). Interestingly, we learn that the Stormtroopers in this Star Wars are taken as children and indoctrinated with one belief system: obedience. And in a very insightful moment, Captain Phasma asks Finn, “who gave you permission to remove your helmet?” (mask?). These are not-so-subtle references to an ISIS like world: abduction, obedience and anti-individualism. (okay, yes, you can say the same thing about the US military, except its abduction by economics).

The explicit lack of politics of the Dark Side, other than nihilism, makes it even more politically current by what scraps are left on the table. This strikes me as a very Disney thing to do: simple narratives of good vs. evil. If the original Star Wars was subtle political commentary, and I think it clearly was, the new Star Wars is more like political anti-commentary. It says more by what’s left out.

As criticized as the three prequel Star Wars movies were, George Lucas actually explained the political landscape of how the emperor rose to power, and made not so subtle references to the lunacy of the George W. Bush administration. Anakin said, “If you are not with me, then you are my enemy”. Under the guise of being attacked (a false flag attack), the Emperor demanded that the senate hand him full power, alongside a reduction of liberties (i.e. the Patriot Act). Not gonna happen in a Disney/JJ Abrams movie.

And of course, this film is a complete remake of the original ’77 film, repackaged on a foundation of quicksand with no new original ideas, and is a kind of fluff simulacra a la Baudrillard, arguably a reflection of the modern propaganda spun towards current day citizens of empire with the intent to turn the world upside down and portray the aggressors as innocent bystanders of someone else’s evil.

In other words, US citizens are always portrayed as innocent victims in support of truth and justice, and that their government is benevolent and full of good intent. Today, as a case in point, the dominant narrative is that ISIS came out of nowhere and has nothing to do with the US invasion of Iraq, or its policies in the Middle East.

To any clear headed observer, this is a blatant falsehood, but to a student of history, it’s a despicable distortion starting with the CIA overthrow of the democratically elected government of Mosaddeq in Iran, and the US policy of destabilizing secular Arab states for over six decades, especially those that chose a course independent of the US hegemon. Not to mention support of the Mujahideen and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan ( see this photo of Reagan meeting with the Mujahideen in the White House: http://bit.ly/1OfEjIg ).

So, in a similar fashion, the Rebels in The Force Awakens are always innocent victims responding to an outside Evil of great magnitude. Except today, that great Evil isn’t fascist states hell bent on world domination, they are rogue nihilists Attacking Us For Our Freedoms™.

For both the audience of Star Wars and the US public generally, we are both meant to identify with the good side of the Force, but instead of Luke Skywalker as the ultimate savior in the film, we just need to endorse a yearly Pentagon budget of $600 billion to rule the world, with the best of intentions, of course.

So with that…

THE COMPARISONS:

Star Wars: The Force Awakens repackages Episode IV almost entirely:

1 Rey = Luke

2 Finn = Leia

3 Ren = Darth Vader

4 Death Star = Planet Weapon (seriously, again?)

5 Jakku = Tatooine

6 New bar scene = equals old bar scene

7 Obi Wan, the mentor, dies = Han Solo, the mentor, dies

8 Rebels meet before they attack death star = rebels meet before they attack planet weapon (same scene basically)

9 R2D2 carries message = BB-8 carries message (a map that makes NO SENSE at all in this case)

10 Rebels are underfunded = rebels are underfunded (how this is possible is a total mystery since they, um, WON last time!)

And on it goes…

Also…as we look closer:

PLOT LINES TO CONSIDER:

I am supposed to believe Luke just gives up because of guilt over training Ren because he went to the dark side, and self-exiles to some far away place? Seems like a chump move for a guy who was the original hero. Shit, not even Obi Wan acted that cowardly. At least he stayed within earshot of Luke as we was growing up.

So, there is a jigsaw like digital map (why the fuck does it look like a puzzle? seriously?) that someone made to identify Luke’s location, even though Luke doesn’t want to be found, and isn’t training Jedi anymore. So why exactly is Luke such a threat to The First Order? I mean the dude just stuck his tail between his legs and ran. He blames himself for creating this mess, and then runs away from it? What are the filmmakers unintentionally saying about this guy?

And who made the map? Can’t he just email the location, encrypted with PGP, and send the thing on to the rebels? I mean, can’t the Map-maker just tell a couple of comrades where Luke is, or did he die being the sole carrier? How did he royally fuck that mission up? Was it a mission? If so, why was this Map-maker on his own if this was so goddamn important? And how, do tell, does a digital map get split up into perfect puzzle pieces? WTF?

Ok, let’s say that Luke made the map and split it up on purpose with R2D2. What’s the point? Why even make a goddamn map in the first place? Can’t you just let your friends know where you are going? Again, encrypted mass email? WTF?

Ok, what is up with The First Order anyway? I get that they look like the 3rd Reich Nazis, but they act more like a planet-destroying ISIS. And how exactly how did the last rebel alliance royally screw up their victory? I mean, how did these guys get their hands on massive quantities of ships, technology, and weapons so easily? Are we to believe the Republic is that weak, and incapable of, oh i dunno, disarming it’s enemies!?

Are the filmmakers really saying that General Leia and Luke are that truly incompetent not to see the rising Nazis/ISIS in their midsts? Did the Republic invade the Star Wars version of the Middle East and set the groundwork for the rise of The First Order? Where were the anti-fascists?

This isn’t necessarily JJ Abrams problem as much as it is the shallowness of the original idea of the Dark/Light side of the Force. That dichotomy is so ridiculously simple, it doesn’t allow for much in the way of nuance. Star Wars is truly a fundamentalist world. But to Lucas’ credit, he tried to explain the larger political context. Clearly, JJ Abrams and Disney don’t really give a shit about that.

If Ren was trained by Luke, there is NOT a chance in hell that either Rey or Finn could have fought him for more than one second in their lightsaber battle at the end. Not one second, especially given the supreme powers that Ren displayed earlier, like stopping a laser blast mid-air, or pulling a guy across a room using the Force. To be consistent in the Star Wars world, Jedis need training, and there’s now way to believe that Rey, let alone Finn, could have survived that encounter. It was a joke. But, I supposer there is one cop-out for the filmmakers: Luke Skywalker is the WORST teacher ever in the history of the Jedi.

The Star Wars universe have some pretty fucking bad parenting problems if all the kids keep falling over to the dark side. How the fuck did Leia, Solo and Luke fuck that one up so bad? It’s seems pretty clear that Rey and Ren are cousins, that Rey is the daughter of Luke, so why did he abandon her? That coward of a parent just sits sulking on an island hidden somewhere in the Universe, and doesn’t go in search of his daughter? Ok, for the sake of argument, lets say it’s not his daughter, but this guy is a JEDI and Ren’s uncle, and he still leaves his nephew behind? WTF?

Generally speaking, Empires don’t destroy the places they conquer which is precisely why they are EMPIRES!! They conquer land to extract resources as the US did in securing its hegemony in the Middle East. Even ISIS conquers land, steals the oil, and sells it to Turkey! (side note: ISIS sells oil to Bilal Erdogan, the son of Turkey’s president, Recep Erdogan). Why would The First Order destroy the planets they want to conquer? It’s far too nihilistic. Where are the politics of The First Order? Is it really that simple: nihilism? This is the strongest evidence for comparing The First Order to ISIS.

Also, why do they do what they do? Apparently, they aren’t racists (Finn) or misogynists (they have females in leadership roles), but yet they conquer to only destroy? Where does that make sense? The best antagonists are smart ones. These guys are cardboard cutouts. Pretty fucking stupid. At least the old emperor was a senator first who skillfully connived his way into dictatorial power. There is logic to that.

Remember when The First Order destroy the home world of the Republic, are we to believe that they are in the same solar system as the rebels? Because we see the red laser sun-ray gun killing planets from the Rebel’s home world. How the fuck is that possible? i mean it’s been 30 years since the original Star Wars, and a lot has progressed in our Sci Fi worlds, and in particular, our understanding of the distance between stars. I was baffled by this obvious oversight.

Was I the only one concerned with the repeat of Mr FishHead talking about the shields? Another bad rip off. But more importantly, it took them a total of maybe 60 seconds to figure out where to attack the planet weapon. That was pathetic, something that even an 8 year old wouldn’t believe. Just a little too easy, and a little to squeaky clean and fast, based on so many assumptions about a weapon they know nothing about. At least with the Death Star, there were STOLEN PLANS that were studied for a long time to find a weakness. That was believable, this was horrendously not believable.

Wasn’t it just a little too convenient that Solo and Chewy found Finn and Rey at the exact time and place that they did? It’s not impossible in Star Wars world, okay, but it is highly improbable. I was just rolling my eyes at this one. At least write something into the script that makes this encounter just slightly believable. Solo claims to have been tracking the ship, but WTF, for how long? Thirty years?

Ok, how is it that the rebels this time under “General” Leia are so under-equipped? I mean, didn’t they WIN last time? They defeated the Emperor with the help of Darth Vader, and you might think that they have the upper hand in terms of force, no? Somehow the tables got turned once again significantly in favor of the Dark Side. Yes, it is necessary for a plot line, but you got some explaining to do JJ.

I am all for a little suspension of disbelief, especially in a space movie, but this was just too much.

Various Incels #sexist incels.co

(Ap0calypse)

The most retarded thing I've seen all year

Can you imagine what being a man would be like?

Everyone takes you seriously. Men view you as human, women view you as stronger. You're on the same level of men, women are either scared of you or attracted to you.

Short men don't get discriminated against. Even short men can be leaders of billionaire drug cartels and have a million followers behind him. Look at El Chapo (translated to literally "short guy").

Bald men are viewed as sexy and strong.

Fat men get paid more than fat women, regardless of education or skill. Everyone looks at fat guys as funny and cool, they're friends.

Fat or ugly women are laughed at. Unless it's a pretty face or hot body, what are women good for, right? It's believed that women have no strength unless it's manipulating men, by looks of course. Without that, they belong in the garbage.

That explains the hate non-hot women get.

Women will always know where they stand in terms of looks because men are LOUD. It starts since when you were a child. Boys in elementary school wouldn't play on the playground with you and refuse to touch you in gym class during obligatory square dancing, boys in middle school would call you a monster and hit you, boys in high school would say "that girl is so ugly" when walking past you in the hallways. In your adult life, men will try to use you as a masturbatory pocket pussy while they battle with the fact that they can't get hot girls. What a win.

Not even attractive women are shielded from a man's hatred. Girls get catcalled from creepy 50 year old men at 12 years old and it makes them feel violated. Even if a woman can use her attractiveness to her advantage, when a woman is no longer attractive as she ages, she is thrown away.

Non-hot men don't get that amount of hate. Life would be a lot easier when your worth isn't 100% determined by how you look or how young you are. If it was impossible to get raped if you had biological strength. Is that why FtM exist? I think so.

(Mexicanmanletcel)

Tell me this idiot is trolling...

(radishman)

It's pretty obvious going by the sub.

And LOL @ short men not getting discriminated against. It's one of the few instances that not only is it allowed, but society encourages it.

(Ap0calypse)

short and bald males are discriminated against on the biological level, i swear everytime I go on reddit it gets worse

(Rheinkwell)

- be a foid
- complain about women losing their worth as they age
- don't realize that ugly men never have any worth to begin with

(manicel)

I loled at the comments:

"One day we were standing in the lunch line with friends and my crush was in front of us. He invited my friends to get in line before him, but as I walked up he put his arm to block me and said "only the pretty girls" and laughed with his friend. I'm sure he did this because somebody told him about my feelings. Thanks to my friends who scorned him for it I did not burst out in tears right there and then."

They legit think this kind of thing doesn't happen to ugly guys lmao

(MayorOfKekville)

This is absolutely inter-dimensional quantum stupidity.

Literally every sentence is the exact diametric polar opposite of the truth.

(Wristlet 2)

fuck that whore, she has no idea what unattractive men go through

let's say she's telling the truth and women are scared, rather than disgusted, of ugly males, which I don't believe but ok. what does that change? how is being feared, hated and unloved a good thing?

Reply to manicel’s post:

life fuel tbh, i love it when chads hurt women's feelings

(I.N.C.E.L.S. Boss)

When she talks about men, she refers to the top 0.5% males.
We are not men in their eyes.

(Catharsis)

How the fuck can you be this disillusioned, what is a normal day like in this OP's life that makes them this inept to their own advantages as a female in modern society

(ColdLightOfDay)

Reply to manicel’s post:

The most confusing thing about that is the fact his horrible personality wasn’t enough to stop him being her crush up till that point.

(Insanity)

this is infuriatingly bad, honestly, I am one of the most chill people you'll meet, I couldn't care less about normies, chads and stacies alike thinking looks don't matter and it's all personality, but these femcels that reject incels on a daily basis and then claim that being a man is much easier to perpetuate their victimhood notion and philosophy triggers me on such an insurmountable level, my blood literally starts boiling

How the fuck can you be this disillusioned, what is a normal day like in this OP's life that makes them this inept to their own advantages as a female in modern society

victim mentality I guess, I honestly have no clue how one can be so mentally handicapped, I've seen it all, I've passed through all the stages, atheism, blackpill-ism, nihilism, I don't care whatsoever about normies and their views on looks and how personality matters and what not, I'm used to people being oblivious to the truth, but man, these chad chasing "femcels" really get under my skin

Cowboy #conspiracy nodisinfo.com

Rudulf, listen things about the moon landing never made sense to me like the crappy Footage yet I never really researched it. Like the tiny Capsule leaving the moon & flying back to earth. The extreme heat & cold of the moon. How the large car fit into the tiny capsule with the men. I mean actually I did read all my encyclopedias A THRU Z: Childcraft, Collier, Encyclopaedia Brittanic, Encyclopedia Americana & library book but it never gave me any answer. Yet I never really researched it. Even trips to the Smithsonian as a kid were useless! But later I found out it was a hoax thru the net & thru accidentally leading Jim Collier (a NYC Jew who also told my the zionists were psychopaths) on an a research of NASA FRAUD Amazing Adventure of a lifetime by introducing him to Bill Cooper at a Militia Gun Rally in Lansing Michigan. I tolx both of them to go to that Rally & pestered the Orgaizer to have them as Speakers. Collier about Computerized Vote Fraud. Cooper about the NWO.

Anyway my point is I should have picked up the ball & really researched NASA & space travel & Space & the ridiculousness of the of the Sun being 93 million miles away. How could you see thru all that black & obsticles that far away???

Also the biggest thing that showed me that supposed science was BS was that all my Encyclopedias liseted completely different ages of dinosaurs & other Animals supposed existances and extinctions & prehistoric ages. And the crazy school books listed yet more completely contradictory time frames!! lol Like for example one would say the same supposed dinosaur existed 7.5 billion years aho and another might say 80 milion years ago! lmao! And at the Smithsonian in DC the Curator admitted to me the a giant Dinosaur I forget it was a T- Rex or Bronchiasaurus contained on like two bones & some teeth & the rest of the bones were theorized or calulated from this couple bones & a few teeth! It always seemed complete BS & impossible to determine what the hell an animal lokked like from that kind of Crappy non scientific theorizing! But they determine all the dinosaurs just like that except some large lizards & Woolly Mammaths! But we still have Komoto Dragons & Elephants & the have no wool from the hoax Wooly mammoths! ‘Cause they are ELEPHANTS! LOL.

Finally my point truth is truth regardless of atracks & trolls & being made fun of, hated scorned or ridiculed!

No excuses Rudulf Research the Flat Earth now!!! It’s amazingly exciting once you start! It just keeps proving it self they more you look at the facts. You can try to disprove it all but you can’t! Not by what you think you know now about it but what you will start discovering!

It’s like discovering a thousand Sandy Hook Hoaxes at once! And people from every walk of life are finding it impossible to disprove & becoming flat earthers as most people 500 years ago. And as a third to half scientists & the engineers & architects still were in 1848! Architects & engineers never account for any curvature of the earth! Not Even Railroad, highway or Bridge engineers. They simple build & engineer the bridges & Railroads according to they lay of the land and deepth water if footings required and all the obsticles in their way like hills & Mountain. I just ask an old retired Bridge & Highways engineer/builder recently if he ever accounted for curvature & he said no he never heard of doing such a thing! See all these guys are never taught to account for curvature so they never even think about it really. When I showed him tge accepted formula for curvature ofbthe earth he said that was crazy. He said that was impossible the earth must be bigger than that…See they always assume the earth must be so big that the curvature never comes into play but it does. We all assume it is to account for our own experience of never observing curvature. And by rationalizing we are seeing the curvature when traveling over hills, dips, valleys & mountains. But–The curvature rapidly comes into play. The next time I saw him he said he was looking for me for days because it was driving him crazy for a couple weeks wanting to have somebody to talk to about it! He said the earth has to be flat & it only took him two days on the internet & doing research to be completely convinced the curvature was completely impossible with all his experience in light of the formula of earth’s increasing curvature per each mile.

If Pilots & Engineers can be completely oblivious to this their entire lives there is no wonder everyday people are! And pilots & Engineers are never taught anything about accounting for curvature or they would either screw everything up dangerously or they’d soon figure out there is no curvature at all! If you tried to adjust for curvature building a highway you’d soon being digging dozens miles into the ground over a few hundred miles! And you would not do that insanity so you would figure it there is no curvature of the earth ever! ..except hills, valleys & moutains & such. The road from South Florida to Key West is a bunch of Bridges atleast 150 miles– Across the Ocean! Yet there is no Curvature a flat level plane of Ocean! Except for places for boats to cross under & such! They built it level with no accounting for the non-existant curvature!

Priscilla Ward #racist salon.com

I'M TIRED OF SUPPRESSING MYSELF TO GET ALONG WITH WHITE PEOPLE

I met my new roommates on Craigslist. Two white, one Chinese. Together we represented Portland, Florida, China and (with me) D.C., and as we moved into our apartment in Bed-Stuy last fall, I was excited for the potential of cross-cultural exchange.

We had a get-to-know you powwow on the rooftop. We talked about ourselves, what brought us to New York. It was a warm evening in September, a couple of weeks after Michael Brown was shot, and somewhere in the mix I brought up Ferguson, hoping to spark a “conscious conversation.” Then it happened. The nightmarish response.

“What’s happening in Ferguson?” one of my white roommates asked. “I heard some kid got shot or something like that.”

The words clamored in my ears. How could he not know? Weren’t his Twitter, Instagram and Facebook feeds flooded with opinions and hashtags? I’m sure he meant nothing by his statement. We’re all ill-informed from time to time. But as I stood there, awkwardly not saying a word — while hundreds of words ran through my head — it was a reminder of how much I would have to suppress in order to get along with my white male roommates in our tiny four-bedroom apartment. This place I would call my home for a year.

It hasn’t always been like this for me. I’m a girl with a fro, raised in the place once known as “Chocolate City.” I grew up part of a black nuclear family, was home-schooled, then became part of of the mini-Historic Black College Experience at Temple University. After arriving in New York, I became an intern at Essence, a magazine so safe I likened my boss to an aunt. Those settings were as comfortable as my grandma’s cooking on any given Sunday.

I longed to crawl back to my tiny black universe. A place where I could create a sense of peace, identity and acceptance, a place where I could sit there, trying to untangle my fro and make sense of what it means to be an African-American woman in this country, rehashing our history while facing present pain. But life happens, and most of us can’t stay in our own utopias forever.

Now I faced a new reality. The brief conversation on the roof that hot September night lasted much longer in my head. I sent myself into a 200-year-old tizzy, reckoning with outdated ideas on race, tampering with prejudice and stereotypes. I became enslaved by my emotions.

I started to worry about all the other things I might have to explain: My hair, the food I eat, why I like Miles Davis, Nina Simone and Marvin Gaye. Maybe I should have considered it a teaching opportunity. But I wasn’t feeling generous. I was all twisted up inside, ablaze over racial dynamics and anxious what other minefields my roommate might stumble upon. I hoped he wouldn’t say something really ignorant, causing me to just snap and go off on an angry rant. Then I’d have to make my living situation salvageable by pocketing my black rage, putting on my best smile and telling him, it’s all love.

I wanted my home to be a refuge, a place where I could be wretched when I wanted, walk around in my bonnet, fry chicken and sing real loud to Aretha Franklin’s R-E-S-P-E-C-T. Suppressing my blackness every day is exhausting. Back at Essence, we used “sister girl language,” but since then, I’d faced tougher environments. I briefly worked at a (now-defunct) women’s fashion website, where I was one of the only black people. I would pitch ideas that mattered to me, like how to do natural hair, only to see them ignored, shuffled to the side or diluted like apple juice in order to be made palatable to mainstream “whiteness.”

I was tired of catering to everyone else’s comforts. How much of my day-to-day experiences as a black woman do I have to filter? I replace “hey girl” with boring hellos. I eat my leftover fried chicken outside the office. In order to have some common point of identifiable communication, I pretend to care about Taylor Swift, or white movie stars on their I’ve-lost-count remarriages and those other white pop stars I could not care less about. “Oh yeah, she’s cute,” I tell them. “Yeah, that’s cool.”

As summer turned to fall and then winter, I continued to be dumbfounded at the way, for some white people, the killing of Michael Brown just didn’t resonate. They didn’t feel the need to pay attention. I guess some white people do act “real vanilla” and only understand the realities of their own universe. Like running around drunk in Santa costumes in the name of SantaCon while “The Millions March NYC” launches in response to the non-indictment verdicts. That’s real.

In December, when the Eric Garner verdict came out, I became loaded down with more emotional baggage than I could conceal. I couldn’t take it anymore. I didn’t care if I wasn’t mixing with others. I found my little black planet at work. I went over to my black boss and talked real low and real brief about how disturbing this all was. I grabbed one of my home girls I work with. We took to the streets to protest right outside my job. I hoped no one would see me and think something misguided.

Walking home that night, I unleashed all my tears. I wanted to reach out and hug a black man. Before I arrived at my apartment, I dried off my face as though nothing happened. My white male roommate asked me about the protest; I gave him a non-detailed response. I said something like, “I’m really upset, but it was a good way for me to get those feelings out.” I couldn’t handle revealing too much; I wanted to avoid a loaded conversation. I took a deep breath and exhaled, closed my bedroom door, picked up the phone, and spoke in whispers about how racist these non-indictments were to my parents, and to my socially conscious white and black friends.

These non-indictments reiterated what I’m up against every single day: the unintentional ignorance of white people. But I was also aware of my willingness to put away my justified “black rage” in order to ensure that my interactions with white people remain comfortable. And the more I hid it, the more crazed I became. By the time my birthday rolled around, in December, I was cooped up in my bed, without an appetite, my fro needing a good deep conditioner. I was making myself sick.

I know this needs to change. I understand that for my own growth, and in order to forge honest relationships with white people I meet — whether it’s my roommates, or my co-workers, or anyone else — I need to reveal myself more. I need to start sharing about my history and my culture and how it plays out in my everyday life as an African American woman. I don’t want this rage to fester into bitterness, or infect the very close white friendships I already have. I don’t want to ignore my rage, but I don’t want to be controlled by it either. Concealing my emotions has made me feel like a ticking time bomb just waiting to go off.

Things are calm right now at the apartment. I don’t bring up these sorts of conversations. I don’t talk about what happens every 28 hours — a black person is killed. My white male roommate and I, we just don’t go there. It makes things easier. Instead, our conversations shuffle between our day-to-day experiences at work, dating and the nuances of the city. I keep those “forbidden” conversations behind closed doors, and even when I’m alone I speak in code. I don’t say “white.” I use “they” instead.

But I want to stop tiptoeing around race. My blackness is not a secret I have to keep. I want to be able to publicly express my honest admiration for being black, outside of my little black planet. I don’t want to feel marginalized, like I can’t speak hard truths about myself. Having honest and challenging conversations with people of another race will hopefully disrupt other people’s ignorance. But it will also help me. I need to stop with my mental temper tantrums. I want to get free.

Pinochet-Heli-Tours #fundie reddit.com

[FAQ of the sub]

Is /r/Physical_Removal a hate sub?

If this sub is a hate sub so would /r/FuckRapists. Its no more a hate sub as it would be if it were a subreddit for how people don't like other people who violently beat and rob them, or others. If leftists don't want to be "hated" then don't try to steal our private property or go around causing harm to others.

But why remove them?

http://i.magaimg.net/img/m0.png

The same reason bar owners have security (bouncers) who will evict unruly citizens from their premises.

Anarcho capitalists, libertarians, and capitalists are NOT pacifists. We are against the INITIATION of force and violence. This means we will and must defend ourselves from your threats, or acts of violence. For you to implement communism it requires you to initiate force or agresss upon us, seize our private property to redistribute and abolish property rights. Private property owners may even feel threatened enough for preemptive defensive measures to ensure their safety depending on the severity of the threat. If you don't want to receive our defensive measures or threats to impose them, then don't threaten to seize our private property and implement communism upon us. Just leave us alone!

Why helicopters?

Traditionally the tool of choice (adpoted by Pinochet) was the helicopter. But its not absolute, nor the only method used to protect us.

Helicopter ride = x

Where "x" is whatever method of defense is issued by the capitalists or private property owners. This includes physical removal or eviction from the free society. Of course the market would devise the most efficient defense methods. Helicopter rides are just a meme example and is also fucking hilarious which helps get the message across. Leftists don't value free speech, thus logic and reason does not work. Historically, violence tends to be the language they comprehend the most.

This is also the logical reason why freedom loving people love being gun owners.

Are you fascists??

Protecting oneself from violence and theft of private property is simply called defense, not fascism. It should also be noted that fascism has historically never operated under or advocated free market conditions.

I assume this community supports Hitler's views?

Not really. Hitler was a socialist who hated jews. Although yes some jews created socialism and communism, it also doesn't not mean all jews are socialists and communists. We are not so focused on race here, merely the actions of humans.

Why the love for Augusto Pinochet?

In 1973 things got so economically bad in Chile the great General Augusto Pinochet (pbuh) decided he needed to seastead leftists into the pacific ocean. These actions prevented his nation from become a third world shithole, and subsequently became known as the great “Miracle of Chile”. His meeting with Milton Friedman and adoption of Chicago School Economic Theory improved the prosperity and economic conditions, and led to an improved quality of life for the people of Chile. All countries need a Pinochet.

Ideally, Pinochet's defense and security services should be privatized and provided via competing services within the free market.

A free society requires defense and enforcement of private property ownership, so that individuals can trade and live prosperously. Leftist ideology in its entirety is based upon envy which subsequently enables violating these basic human rights, as such they are a threat that needs to be defended against in order for society to optimally function freely. Statism was Pinochet's only "crime", although minarchists will argue defense is a valid role of the state. Ancap and miniarchist libertarians should support each other until we get to the point were police, military, and courts are all that is remaining of the state.

Augusto Pinochet's great deeds in this world caused him to transcended and evolve into an all powerful meme form, where he now serves Lord Kek in the afterlife.

Do you have to be an ancap to support physical removal?

No not at all. While there's a government (which will be the case for many lifetimes), its perfectly reasonable to be more sympathetic to any liberty or anti leftist politicians available who will provide the most free markets. Anarcho capitalism can be viewed as merely the end game or direction humanity needs to head into for the best outcomes for freedom. The new dogma for the right wing should be to seek positions of government and dismantle the state, and thus protect liberty by removing power from the left, which in turn brings back power to the people and to the invisible hand of the free market, where we are free to make our own choices.

What about the NAP (Non Aggression Principle)?

You can't defend yourself or private property (your liberty) without threats to defend, and a means to physically protect it if action is needed. When a violent mob of rabid commies threatens, attacks you or comes to steal your stuff, dogmatic moralist ideals and trying to explain the NAP to them won't get you very far. They don't even value freedom of speech for a start. Again, we are not pacifists! We must be capable to defend our liberty!

Why do you like Donald Trump?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hOCvWx9Lusc

President Donald J Trump is like a great prophet who has enabled many people to finally see and realize the true nature of the left. He is the great triggerer and also one of the greatest internet shitposters of all time.

Anarcho Capitalists and libertarians need to be pragmatic if they are to have a respected voice and survive into the future. Sure Trump is not an ancap or perhaps even a libertarian, and we aren't realistically going to get an ancap president in our life time. So there's no problem in supporting his measures to cut and slash government as he (Trump) has stated he will. Don't forget under Hillary we would be almost silenced and pushed aside and labelled as crazy as they grew the government and took away freedoms. At least Trumps main audience support the majority of what we say, and the direction we want things to head towards. We now have a president who is a warrior for the private sector, aka the productive people of society who do the heavy lifting for all the parasites to leech off.

Why do you group leftists and liberals into the same group?

I'll stop identifying and grouping statism, communism, progressivism, liberalism, and socialism as being the same thing, when they stop confusing my money and private property as being theirs.

Donald Marshall #conspiracy m.datehookup.com

My name is Donald Marshall, I have been cloned by a large secretive cult known as the "Free Masons" and "The Vrill Society" and "Scientologists" together called the Illuminati. They make replicated bodies of people to victimize in terrible ways, they clone children for men with underdeveloped penises to have sex with. Some very famous and politically powerful people all getting together for a disgusting time. Most of the G20 gather there to discuss worldly matters and watch gruesome things done to innocent people for sport. I have seen this firsthand and will tell all as it must be stopped. The political people started bringing movie stars and musicians there to hang around with them, they can control who remembers the cloning facility and who will remain oblivious even though not remembering still damages you. I know who is involved, the ring leaders and everything they do.

It is basically a torture and child molesting factory, I was one of those children but when I was young to keep the perverts off of me I started singing songs... original songs, very good ones, they told me to keep making these songs and I wouldn't get hurt, and so I did, then they started bringing me there everyday for songs as the celebrities wanted more, they called me the goose that layed the golden egg, the phenomenon, but I ran out of ideas, then the torture began. They smashed my face to start, throwing me around scaring me a 5 year old never letting me remember in real life until I turned 30. The torture worsened until I was being stabbed and burned and repeatedly sodomized. At age 30 they allowed me to remember these clone memories and now everytime I enter R.E.M sleep I am there, I don't have dreams only clone memories, they made the movie "The Island" and "Inception" about this subject. They think they're very sly and untouchable.

They have nothing to do but show off for each other in disgusting ways, they have no shame, it seems nothing embarrases them. They sit there in the stands of an unused arena smaller than a hockey rink but can still seat between 300 and 400 people with dirt in the center where the ice would be, they have frightened clones of children go into the middle to be victimized for a bizarre disgusting spectacle sometimes having animals like dogs have sex with them while a man holds the leash so it won't bite them on the back of the neck, which I've seen happen before. They all try to out do each other in their levels of depravity, to be evil is "cool" to them.

Now to tell you about the ring leaders as unbelievable as it may be to you, but you must believe me, this is a world emergency. The royal family of England,... yes Queen Elizabeth,Phillip Duke of Edinburgh and Prince Charles are the worst of them, unbelievable depraved perverts all showing off for the celebrities that go there, Elizabeth has the children there call her "lillibet" and does ungodly things to them, some she fakes being nice to, some she is terrible to, cutting them with swords while they scream, the decent people that are there against their will are afraid to say anything against them, most have their children there as a kind of hostage, to be torn apart if they even think of informing anyone, but as they have been torturing me terribly anyway I will tell all, Vladamir Putin loves to put the fear of torture and death into people but is essentially a cowardly pervert himself. Most of the famous people are ashamed to speak or be seen by me there very much,as they're ashamed of the perverse and disgusting gatherings, I am a decent person and will not participate in these acts, so they use me as an example and torture me for my being a good person. They've drugged me and had me say and do disgusting things in a blurred state just in case any of this comes to light so I can be hated as well by any that prove this.

C.S.I.S Canadian intelligence are all involved, including a lot of Commissionaires and Prime Minister Steven Harper himself, They do what Elizabeth says, seem to follow her every whim without question, It doesn't matter who you are, If you have a cute child or a child with a moneymaking ability (like song making) they will clone your child, and molest them, it's a pedophiles paradise and must be stopped. Elizabeth secretly owns a few music companies, (universal and others) with bands under contract, she forces me while under the knife to compose music for them, if I can't she will stab my clone, burn me have her pervert thugs smash my body there. It's causing me some kind of heart damage and severe debilitating headaches.

One good person there Bernie Mac comedian and actor tried to stand up for me speak up for me saying it's not right to do to a human being,... tried to have others join him in speaking out against the clone torture zone while there,... Elizabeth and Phillip had him tortured so badly there as an example of their "power" he had an aneurysm the next day and died. Now no one will speak up, they're all afraid of suffering the same fate. All it will take is a few lie detector tests, I will volunteer for them, they cover up for themselves so carefully that it will be the only way. I know of many non famous people that could be given a lie detector test to to prove this.

When it comes to the sexual exploitation of a child lie detectors are admissable in Canadian courts. I need decent people with integrity so speak to about this filthy business, to tell who is involved. There is much more to tell, I am a wealth of information about this topic. Also Elizabeth had princess Diana Spencer killed by having someone shine the brightest light known to mankind through the window side on to the car, they swerved away from it and hit the divider, it was no paparazzi. Diana survived though, and while either on the way to or in the hospital was injected with a high concentration of salt which is near undetectable and died. She did this because Diana was going to marry an Arab. Diana hated them, knew about the cloning stuff and wanted nothing to do with it, but was afraid of being killed so said nothing. I know this and many more things that I will be more than happy to tell.

Corey Savage #sexist returnofkings.com

7 Ways Modern Women Treat Men Like Dogs

Corey is an iconoclast and the author of ‘Man’s Fight for Existence’. He believes that the key to life is for men to honour their primal nature.

For all the feminist criticism of men supposedly treating women like dogs, it is actually today’s feminism-infected women that are treating men like domesticated animals.

While the majority of women still prefer masculine men for relationships, I’ve been noticing how more and more women today are defying their biology for ideological reasons and are pursuing long-term relationship with men they’re not even attracted to just because they are supplicant and effeminate. If this trend continues unabated, I expect the entire male population to turn into weak and feckless bonobos who grovel around to serve female interests.

Observe the following comparisons to see how men are being turned into dogs for both women and the state:

1. Dogs are optional

Dogs as pets are optional. People get a dog only when they want one; it’s not a necessity. Men today are also increasingly becoming an object of utility for a woman rather than a man whom she forms a bond with for a nuclear family. She will marry a man when she wants to (if at all) and she will dump him when she feels like it.

2. Once attached, dogs offer unconditional loyalty

If you want a picture of what the feminists want from men, just imagine a world where all men are male feminists.

Once dogs have a human to call a master, it doesn’t care whether he is a scumbag, loser, criminal, or homeless. Dogs are faithful no matter who their master is and what he does. In fact, they’re so loyal that they’ll even remain with an owner that mistreats them. And that’s exactly what feminists want men to be.

If you observe the rhetoric of the feminists, you’ll notice two general themes: first, the desire to be free from all criticisms. And second, for men to believe them and “support” them no matter what. Feminists want their prospective low-testosterone boyfriends and husbands to fully accept them for who they are no matter how disgusting, slutty, crass, and toxic they are. They want their men to show unconditional loyalty so that they can openly cheat on them and brag about it. And men, if they don’t want to be called a misogynist, must never question their partner’s past or present behavior and remain faithful even if they’re treated like garbage.

3. Dogs do what they’re told

Once the owner has secured his dog’s loyalty, he can train it to behave on command. Some owners enjoy the power they have over their companions and they will order their dogs around for fun.

Western women today have discovered that there are truck loads of desperate men who will do just about anything for them to win an ounce of female approval. These women have successfully used men to take them out on expensive dinners (only make fun of them on their blogs afterwards), buy pizza for them for free, shovel snow for them, and so on. The women who order these men around like dogs didn’t even have to train them as they’ve already been conditioned from birth by the society to do what women tells them to do.

4. Dogs are treated for good behavior
image
Dogs need to be treated to reinforce good behavior; the same is true when you want to domesticate men as second-rate citizens.

Women understand just how desperate the general male population is for affection and sex. Women today are leveraging this power over men to make them behave the way they want them to, rewarding these simps with faked compliments so that they’ll continue being good boys.

5. Dogs defend their masters
image
One serves a man, the other serves the government and its harem of women.

Besides companionship, the main roles dogs play is to defend their masters. In spite of all the calls for equality, the reality is that women still expect men to defend and save them. The men suffering from white knight syndrome will go as far as sacrificing their own lives to rescue women they don’t even know.

Feminists also don’t mind that many men are serving the police and military force to serve their alpha boyfriend: the government. Women are innately attracted to power and the government is the new protector and provider of women that grows bigger and stronger each day while ordinary men are becoming weaker and irrelevant.

6. Dogs are neutered

Although men aren’t getting physically neutered the way dogs are, other methods are being employed to psychologically castrate men. This includes the epidemic use of ADHD drugs to tame boys, ridiculous laws aimed at controlling men’s sexual interactions with women, and the overall cultural currents to shame masculinity while promoting all sorts of degeneracy that dilute it. Today’s wives don’t even want to get sexual with their husbands.

7. Dogs that are not domesticated are pests

“Masculine men are organizing a meeting? They must be rapists!”

When a dog is not owned by a human being, it is considered a pest that needs to be controlled.

Men today who do not submit to the feminist agenda are constantly attacked as being losers, sexists, misogynists, rapists, and so on. In today’s feminist society, you either serve the female imperative or you’re a Neanderthal who is out of touch with the times. Steps are already being made to control every aspect of male behavior in public.

You should also remember that dogs are natural pack animals (think of their cousins, wolves). By being removed from the pack, they become isolated and dependent on their masters. Can you see how the same applies for today’s men?

The Differences

In addition to being dogs, men are also expected to serve as drones to keep the feminist nanny-state running.

In spite of all the similarities, there are differences that need to be addressed.

First, unlike dogs whose owners house them and feed them, men are not supported by women. Women are free to throw men away like used tampons or divorce their husbands to extract their cash. If anything, men are usually the ones who must provide for their wives.

Second, whereas dogs are under the responsibility of their owners, men are expected to be fully responsible in all their interactions with women. It is the man’s job to ensure that a woman is giving consent even if both parties are drunk; it is men who must watch over their own behavior to ensure that what they say is non-offensive and conforming; and it is men who must ensure that women feel perfectly safe and comfortable in all their interactions. If you so much as walk past a woman in the wrong manner, you’ll be accused of rape. Again, it is the man’s responsibility to ensure that he is acceptable enough to share the same space as women, not the other way around. Feminists want “equality” without accountability.

Are men becoming collectively domesticated?
image
The domesticated cows we see on farms didn’t end up the way they are now naturally. It was through thousands of years of herding and selective breeding that they became smaller, more passive, and accepting of their conditions. But the fact is, it doesn’t take thousands of years to transform entire species. In this article which I recommend you read, a Soviet project to domesticate foxes have shown that it only takes several generations of selective breeding to transform wild foxes into effeminate and tamed versions of themselves.

The global testosterone level around the world has been mysteriously dropping for the past few decades. While chemical toxins in all the products we consume and come in contact with has been given as one possible explanation, I wouldn’t be surprised to find out that we as species are gradually becoming emasculated at a genetic level through the selective breeding process. In other words, we are becoming socially engineered to be effeminate. It’s not something impossible when you consider that easily tamable beta males, the sperm donors, are usually the males women select as their mates after they themselves are done riding the cock-carousel. I think it’s a factor we should consider besides the emasculation through cultural degeneracy that we’re already familiar with.

Men are supposed to be men unleashing their primal energy through raw adventure instead of getting tamed into submission. I have no doubt that the systematic domestication efforts of today is what is causing collective male nihilism, depression, and frustrated energy. Men who are awake must allow themselves be men.

If you like this article and are concerned about the future of the Western world, check out Roosh's book Free Speech Isn't Free. It gives an inside look to how the globalist establishment is attempting to marginalize masculine men with a leftist agenda that promotes censorship, feminism, and sterility. It also shares key knowledge and tools that you can use to defend yourself against social justice attacks. Click here to learn more about the book. Your support will help maintain our operation.

ToxicPersonality #sexist #psycho incels.co

Im going to touch female coworker

I will touch female coworker now when i go there in a few days. Ass and titties. This will satisfy me and i will press my cock against her ass. It will be very enjoyable for me

Nice larp greycel.

I have already "bumped" into her on "accident" a few times. Its a small space with many of us so its believable that i could have because people are bumping into each other all day basically. But this time i will grab her waist and touch her nice ass with my cock

Hello cucktear infiltrator

Typical Greycel post

This cunt is obviously a foid infiltrator. Every thread it posts on has some stupid and/or larping bullshit like this mods need to get their act together tbhngl

Its not my fault that you are low t and dont want to put ur dick against womens asses.

”He is saying he will sexually assault them.

OP, rub one for me.”

When did he say that? He said he was gonna partake in normal interactions that happen in work day.
I wouldn't advise it personally due to metoo, I don't even meet with foids alone, unless they are western foids, because a noodle might not just metoo me for being ethnic, she might even have me organ harvested

If you look it up there was only like 2k lawsuits for workplace sexual harassment but lkke 5million was touched

They would lynch you if you were accused of fiddling a noodlewhore. Stay safe dude. The way OP wrote it seems as if he is going to be against her will.

She wont say anything due to my t mogging every soy shes met, i dont believe anyone shes worked with there has enough t to press his cock on her infront of everyone. I will satisfy myself in a truly blackpilled high t manner and everyone will tremble before my awesome power

Based gropemaxxer, mogs me.

Thanks guys. I will grope her titties and ass good when i work next. She will be my cum slave because my high t blackpilled groping will make her animal brain submit to me as my personal cum dumpster and fuckhole.

FidelCashflow & tomomot919 #sexist #racist incels.co

[Soy] Jfl at this Albanian simp

image

image

tomomot919

dude half of these posts are about girls trashing guys so... and stop creeping on people

b_tommyl

I'm a Albanian man myself. You wouldn't understand what happens to Albanian woman because you have the privilege of doing what ever the fuck you want with out being called a "kurve" just for simply breathing. And yes there is a word in Albanian for man hoes it's "Kurvar" wonder how you would feel if the roles were reversed.

tomomot919

dude stop simping... while you act like knight in shiny armor for some woman, she's getting railed by some Italian or German dude!

b_tommyl
Respecting woman and your fucking mother is not a bad thing. And also don't be saying shit like "i like non Albanian woman" but then getting jealous that Albanian woman dont like you. Also my sister so happens to be qettinq married to an amazing 6th generation American man of German decent. They both work, they both cook, they both clean, they do everything together. Most importantly he doesn't disrespect her or keep her locked inside a house cleaning like most Albanian men a known for

Albanian men as a whole are pretty based when it comes to females. This causes an issue because females want to be complete sluts that nobody can control, so they are always sperging out against Albanian men for trying to stop them from being whores.

What happened when an Albanian female enters the west is that she becomes a complete whore and will never date an albanian guy.

Above we have a simps albanian guy trying to white knight for women. Then a based Albanian man calls him out and drops some blackpills. The simp then reveals that hes right and his sister is married to an aryan non Albanian man who will allow her to be a degenerate whore

Archbishop Cranmer #fundie archbishopcranmer.com

‘Give me the child for the first seven years and I will give you the man’ is a Jesuit maxim attributed to Saint Ignatius of Loyola, founder of the Society of Jesus. He probably never said it, or if he did, he almost certainly said: ‘Give me the boy for the first seven years and I will show you the man’. The quote is also attributed to Aristotle, but in a sense the source doesn’t matter, for by its attribution to both one of the greatest spiritual minds and one of the greatest philosophical thinkers ever to have existed, it moves beyond cultural constructivism to transcendent truth: the workings of the mind were designed to be subject to time and space.

And into that time and space comes children’s education, by which process their moral, cultural and religious values are inculcated and their politics are moulded – from the history lesson which scorns the ethics of empire to the singing of ‘I vow to thee my country’ in the daily act of collective worship, schools are places where political perspectives become truths and religious exposure becomes morality. There is, of course, much debate concerning the proper aims of education and the right balance (should such a thing exist) between the prescriptive statutes of governments and the freedoms of parents and particular religious groups, but in a liberal democracy there must be the means to impart the knowledge of citizenship which is deemed necessary to sustain that liberal democracy, or the state ceases generation-by-generation to be either liberal or democratic.

Relationship and Sex Education (formerly Sex and Relationship Education) is one of those subjects which straddles the government-parent-religion tensions of responsibility and provision. For some, it is the task of parents to teach sexual morality and reify good relationship; for others, it is the joint responsibility of parents and religious communities, with a civic minimum imparting the essential facts of biology and social reality. For others still, mindful of parental delinquency and religious prejudice in this regard, it is fundamentally a function of the state to ensure that all children are taught the knowledge and life skills they will need to develop healthy relationships and stay safe while having sex.

The question and tension which then arises is related to age-appropriateness: at what point does the scientific naming of private body parts or discussion about where babies come from become consideration of emotional and physical changes; and then at what point those changes become discussions about different kinds of families or the differences between boys and girls; and then at what point those differences become discussions about engaging in sex, contraception or condoms, homosexuality and transgender people. And what about abortion? And then there is sexual experimentation, orgasms, group sexual experiences, oral sex, masturbation…

Would it surprise you to know that discussions about transgender are deemed appropriate for eight-year-olds?

One state primary school in Birmingham, where the children are predominantly Muslim, introduced RSE lessons to promote LGBT equality. The Guardian reported in January that the programme includes “the welcoming of people of any race, colour or religion and those who are lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender”. There is, of course, nothing wrong with welcoming people, but what is the age-appropriate way of explaining lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender to a four-year-old? What are books entitled ‘Mommy, Mama and Me‘ or ‘King & King‘ designed to inculcate about the morality of same-sex relationships and same-sex marriages? Birmingham school LGBT Muslim protestOne parent Fatima Shah is quoted: “Children are being told it’s OK to be gay, yet 98% of children at this school are Muslim. It’s a Muslim community. [Mr Moffat (assistant headteacher)] said all parents are on board with it, but the reality is, no parents are on board with it.” She added: “We have nothing against Mr Moffat – we are as British as they come. We respect the British values… but the problem is, he is not respecting our ethos as a community. We don’t send our children to school to learn about LGBT. We send them to school to learn maths, science and English.”

Andrew Moffat, who is gay and was appointed MBE in 2017 for services to education, responded: “I’m just teaching children from an early age that there are different families out there and, let’s not forget, that in some schools there are children with two mums, so I see it that they’re not being taught anything. All they’re seeing is their family is being accepted. We want all children in Birmingham to know that their family is normal; that their family is accepted and welcomed in schools.”

Last week Mr Moffat gave in, and subjugated the ethos of his school to the religious ethos of the majority Muslim parents: all LGBT lessons have been stopped. He did this because hundreds of those parents decided to withdraw their children from the lessons, which is their legal right. But what if RSE were to become mandatory, as the Government intends? What option would parents then have if they felt their children were being taught matters of sex and sexuality which they deemed to be age-inappropriate? “We are not a bunch of homophobic mothers,” Fatima Shah said. “We just feel that some of these lessons are inappropriate. Some of the themes being discussed are very adult and complex and the children are getting confused. They need to be allowed to be children rather than having to constantly think about equalities and rights.”

The themes being discussed are complex for adults, too, because it matters of sexuality and gender it isn’t at all clear where nature end and nurture begins. And that is the essence of the grievance these Muslim parents have: they feel their children are not simply being education in the sociological fact of homosexuality and transgender, but inculcated – or ‘indoctrinated’, as one parent put it – into the moral virtue of such expressions of identity. Now, you may believe that homosexuality is as innate as heterosexuality, and transgender is simply another increment on the spectrum of human diversity, but for others the causal debate is more nuanced, not least because there is conflicting evidence from eminent scientists and psychologists on both sides of the divide. While some favour the ‘nature’ explanation based on biology or genetics, others incline to the ‘nurture’ theory, based on the psychological reaction to upbringing and environment, which obviously includes education.

The Bible’s understanding of biology (and, indeed, that of the Qur’an) is a world apart from modern studies, and theologians are as divided as scientists. Some insist that cultural factors contribute in psycho-sexual development, embracing Freudian psychological theory, for example, which asserts that homosexual orientation is a consequence of the failure to identify with the same-sex parent; that a physical or emotional distance between the child and the same-sex parent results in a failure to be able to identify with one’s own sex. This results in a same-sex deficit, which the homosexual is unconsciously trying to repair by creating emotional and sexual relationships with people of the same sex. It is not so much a moral degeneracy but an emotional immaturity, and one therefore capable of being healed through therapy.

This is the view of the great majority of Muslims, and also of a great many Christians and Jews. The cause of homosexual orientation being somehow a combination of both nature and nurture – a psychogenetic fusion – would therefore be susceptible to educational inculcation. If the ethos of a school is toward ‘tolerance’ of homosexuality and transgender as ‘natural’, and that ethos is reified by teachers who impart notions of equal validity and moral parity, then what the Bible or Qur’an happen to say becomes irrelevant: British values trump God’s created order. If a child feels a bit gender-neutral or trans one day, why not explore androgyny further? Why not try living as the opposite sex for a while? It might be fun. It certainly makes you a bit more interesting and gets you noticed.

There is no easy solution to this: the government-parent-religion tensions will persist in state education until one party asserts its dominance – which appears to be imminent – at which point the other parties will respond or react. While reason demands the serious critical consideration of scientific studies, and certainly those which are concerned with the possibility that same-sex preference and transgender may be genetically programmed, not all innate tendencies in children are either good or desirable. But that is too nuanced a debate in this febrile atmosphere. It is to be noted that in the hundreds of parents who have withdrawn their children from LGBT lessons in this school, sporting their banners declaring ‘Education not Indoctrination’, ‘My Child My Right’ and ‘Say No to sexualisation of children’, they have not been condemned as homophobes or bigots by LGBT lobby groups. If these had been Christian parents, however, no doubt Amanda Spielman would have issued an instant press release, and Peter Tatchell would have been there in a flash.