Similar posts

Unknown #racist natvan.com

[Anti-race mixing ad]

The National Alliance believes that the human beings that are most closely linked -- that is, the races -- should remain separate and distinct and unique. Those opposing us believe quite the opposite: that all of the races should be mixed -- that husbands and wives should be of different races, for example -- so that the end result is an averaging of the races in terms of, most visibly, skin color. But far more important than skin color -- far more different than skin color -- are the many unique traits that each race possesses: not just physical traits, such as skin color and eye color and hair color, but also mental and psychological traits such as creativity, the ability to abstract, qualities of temperament, and so on. Suppose someone suggested that we must do everything possible to make sure that all of the varieties of beer -- stouts, ales, lagers, and so on -- are mixed so as to create a single type of mongrelized beer. It could have the brand name "Mongrel." The ad campaigns would have interesting slogans: "After a long day, kick back with your mutt and a Mongrel." Anyone can see this would ruin beer, why can't people see it also ruins the human race?

Pianke Nubiyang #racist rastafarispeaks.com

Fact one: Scientific American report on the genome project show that Europeans are about 75 percent African chromosomes. Asians are about 60 percent African chromosomes

East Indians (particularly black-skinned, African faces) are about 95 percent African chromosomes. The Negritoes of India/Andaman Islands are about 100 percent African chromosomes, so are the Blacks of New Guinea, Papua, West Papua, Melanesia and parts of Australia. Africans South of the Sahara are about 98 to 100 percent African chromosomes. Those of the North are about 95 percent.

Now there is a 'mysterious' chromosome/alu in Europeans and Asians. THAT IS THE NEANDERTHAL GENE. It is not found in most Africans except those who are mixed with Europeans or Asians.

That 'Neanderthal' gene is an INFERIOR TRAIT AND GENE and it is not fully human but closer to a 'primitive' gene that came out of an archaic form of humans. So, this clearly tells us who is closer to the semi-human Neanderthal. It is those with the most Neanderthal genes. Yet, since most people have more African genes, they are closer to the fully human African than they are to the hairy, archaic Neanderthal.

Neanderthal genes in whites or non-Blacks is not a mark of 'white supremacy' IT IS AN INFERIOR TRAIT, LIKE BLONDE HAIR, BLUE EYES AND PALE SKIN. What benefits are these to the earth's environment when pale skin is suceptale to skin cancer and quick aging, blonde hair cannot protect the scalp from sunburn and blue eyes are recessive traits.

Hence, those who know these are inferior, recessive traits continue to promote these traits as 'superior,' and desirable.

It is even more foolish to say that the genes of a human closer to the homoerectus, semi-ape is somehow 'superior.' There is nothing 'superior' about having Neanderthal genes. If we look at the ancient cultures of those with Neanderthal genes, we find barbarism of the worse sort, destroying of females and old people, warlike activities, roaming the wilderness of Eurasia and pillaging, infanticide (as in abortion, in destroying girls in parts of Asia, ect.). We find racism, casteism and philosophies that promote hatred of people and love of dogs (as in the New Orleans Flood disgrace where dogs were saved and Black people left to perish).

These are the differences between the PURE BLACK RACE WHO ARE 100 PERCENT FULLY HUMAN, AND THE PALE RACE WHO ARE 25 TO 40 PERCENT NEANDERTHAL.

Now the more Negroes/Blacks intermarry and defile the Black gene, the more they will continue to add this semi-ape, Neanderthal gene in the Black race and the more Blacks will become fragile and affected by all types of strange diseases. Hence, the objective is to reject all intermarriage, reject all homosexuality and same sex trickery, have lots of pure Black babies and unite to improve Black culture.

When we look at the ancient cultures of the Black/Negro peoples from the Americas, Africa, South India, South China, Mesopotamia....we find great civilizations, sedentary living, agriculture, respect for nature, respect for women.

theicarlyangel #fundie comments.deviantart.com

thanks to them, I call myself homophobic because of how mean and nasty they are. One of them sent me a gay porn fanfiction and I was disgusted, but I dealt with him maturely and blocked him. Now I really DO consider myself homophobic because they're terrifying. As one a cartoon animated character once said, "You think the only people, are people who think like you."
Be proud of being homophobic/hating homosexuality. I get bullied too and been told to die in Hell. :XD: Idgafudge though. :D That just shows them how immature they can be. :) I am never teaching my kids homosexuality is okay, but I will also not let them bully the LGBT. The LGBT is just hurt and confused, if they would just stop being so mean and respect others' beliefs, that'd be great. And accepting a belief is not the same thing as supporting a belief.


[ "Do you know the reasons WHY the LGBT community is often hurt and confused?" ]

Bullied, kicked out of their homes, etc. So yeah, I do know. Why should that change my viewpoint that I don't agree with homosexual rights?

[ "Have you seen the way society treats homosexuals?" ]

No, but I surely do see how homosexuals treat non-supporters of homosexuality.

[ "They are constantly being shunned simply for their sexuality. I've heard of people who can't get a job just for being gay, gay children are being disowned and kicked out of their houses by their own parents, people have even been MURDERED just for the sake of being homosexual. The treatment towards REAL homosexuals is more than just "bullying the LGBT"." ]

Yes, and guess what? People who don't support homosexuality also get shunned simply because of their own belief and viewpoint AND on what they wish to follow. People also get fired from their jobs if they disagree with homosexuality which isn't fair either. Yes, in OTHER COUNTRIES. I did nothing. Don't bash me, someone that's innocent who doesn't wish death upon homosexuals. People have also sent me death threats for not support homosexuality. I guess being on both sides sucks.

[ "Homosexuals aren't just sensitive or butthurt about people having different beliefs. They're not being "mean"; they're biting back." ]

But I did NOTHING. Why bash someone innocent when I did NOTHING? Do you think every freaking non-support of the homosexuality club wishes death upon people or wants them to die or wants them to be bullied? NO. What they're doing is sick and wrong. (I'm talking about the whole biting back issue.) They are butthurt and sensitive when someone doesn't follow their ways, so yeah. There's a HUGE problem here.

[ "Now I'm not saying that I HAVEN'T seen any rabid or immature LGBT members, but the main reasons for homosexuals attacking the homophobes back is NOT simply because of the fact that they don't support LGBT; it's because they're fighting to earn the same rights for not being judged by their sexuality, since enough homophobes have already judged gays simply by their sexuality. Telling a gay person to respect a homophobe's opinion is basically like telling a black person to respect a racist's opinion." ]

A skin color is different from a sexuality. Don't even compare the two. -_- I do not wish for gay/lesbian coupling to be as equal as straight coupling. What REALLY needs to happen here is for the LGBT to fight back the bullies and search for someone who is open-minded and kind. Religious people also get bashed as well. Now, imagine if everyone followed the bible, THEN everyone get along as well, but NO. Not going to happen, want to know why? Because not everyone believes God exists, not everyone thinks he made our world. They believe in the Big Bang Theory. Sure, it would be easier if everyone got along, but not everyone is going to see eye-to-eye and you need to learn to cope with it.

[ I am sorry, but the fact that you are ONLY looking at rabid LGBT members who have attacked YOU on the Internet makes you sound biased. NOT ALL homosexuals attack homophobes for not following their beliefs, but you treat it like they do. You probably still missed my point that LGBT is MORE than just an "opinion". I brought up race with sexuality because... as I said, they are both a matter of human rights. You can't just simply tell gays to respect homophobes' opinions and get over it because "Oh everyone thinks differently and we should all respect each other's beliefs just fine and dandy like that", no. Then can we just simply say that blacks should respect racists' opinions or that women should respect sexists' opinions just because they think differently. ]

First of all, I don't need to be 'educated' when I obviously am going to disagree with you. No, I don't. Also I know that, and I know not all homosexuals are bad and they actually accept me for me. No, a sexuality is NOT human rights. Yaoi and Yuri is wrong and it will forever BE wrong. You may think whatever you'd like, go on. You've got a choice to be gay or not, I don't think they should be as accepted as straight couples because homosexuality IS wrong. I don't know why you bring racism into something that is gay. I don't know enough about racism to debate about that so I am going to leave you be for someone else to argue with you.

[ Really? You're just going to let a serious issue slide like that? Being oppressed/disowned/killed over one little aspect means nothing to you? ]

Ummm... I'm gonna say, yes. Because hey, everyone's been through Hell and that's me included, but you gotta stay boss and move onwards and don't let people drive you down in the dirt. You gotta think happily and positively and whatever has been done has been done. I can't do anything about that. Do I think it's okay for them to be oppressed, disowned, and killed? No. Do I have to worry about it? No. Because I don't live where they are and I can't help them out when I am probably half-way across the world. Like someone said, ya gotta leave the past behind ya. It's not my fault it's still going on. No need to bash on me.

[ So you're basically saying an inferior group is not allowed to be equal as a superior group just based on their sexuality? Welp, I'm sorry, but that IS judging people by their sexuality, saying that homos don't deserve the same rights as straights. You are basically okay with oppressing human rights there. No, I disagree! ]

How on Earth is that judging someone on their sexuality?! JUST HOW? I don't understand your logic, what gave you that conclusion?! I NEVER said I want homosexuals to die and rot in Hell, seriously and that they should be treated like garbage, WHAT made you come to that conclusion? Are you that dense and close-minded or what? Agreeing with someone's rights is not the same thing as accepting someone for who they are.


[ Also, I have often seen you try to use "I hate homosexuality, but not homosexuals" as an excuse. That doesn't even make any friggin sense. It'd be like saying "I hate black skin color but I don't hate black people!" or "I hate vaginas but don't hate women for having them". Here's another reason I bring up sexism/racism to homophobia. Like different races with their skin color, homosexuals can NOT control their sexuality. They can't just wake up one morning and decide "Oh I want to be gay from now on!". Sexuality is a NATURAL aspect that people carry with them from birth or at a very young age. You can't change sexuality, and that is why most homosexuals hate homophobes. They are being oppressed for having a natural trait that they can't control, and that is another form of anti human rights. ]

Okay, first of all, it does make sense. It means I hate same-gender coupling and I could care less about it, but to people who like it or who are gay, then fine. I won't stop you. Be whoever you want. Give me one good reason why I should hate you over your sexuality. Don't you dare compare someone's skin color to a sexuality. Those are TWO different things. Look, I don't think racism is that much of an issue because from where I live, there's not much of it here... and anyways, loving someone versus a color of a skin are two completely different things. Sure, you can't help if someone has a skin color or if someone's gay, that's just who they are. It doesn't mean I hate them, it just means I would either hate their skin color or a sexuality. Just like if someone wore an outfit you personally don't like. You don't have to like it, it's their style and their choice. I for one don't hate anyone for being black/tan. It is not NATURAL. Okay, I can't change a sexuality, but what I can do is be against homosexuality. I am not supporting the idea to oppressed people. Seriously, how does someone NOT support homosexuality made you even come to that conclusion?

Ugh, I am done here. You're way too thick-headed for me. Go do something that makes you happy and positive. We are obviously gonna disagree here and nothing you say will change my mind and I will not change my beliefs just to please you. Have an awesome day and remember: Treat others the way you like to be treated.


[Also, regarding your last comment there; Just because you have not been oppressed it doesn't mean that you simply shouldn't care. There is a thing called empathy. If you could just put herself in a homosexual's shoes for once, you would know that being abandoned and killed just for being gay is not something you can just "think positively and get over with" about.]

I do care and I do feel bad for them, but I shouldn't worry about it. I should worry about myself and what needs to get done and what I can do to help make things a better place. Heck, I've been sexually abused since I was little, been bullied and harassed since the 3rd grade, and have gotten my heart broken. When people debate with me, my heart and liver hurts even more. It REALLY does. Which is why I tend to block people and think happily and positively and worry about myself first. I still need to worry about the work I need to get done and how am I going to succeed in life.

[ When you say that famous line 'treat others the way you want to be treated' , you need to understand that it also means that involves human rights as well. And that no one should be denied them. You wouldn't like your rights being taken away I'm sure. ]

Straight is normal and since two of the opposite gender can make a baby, I feel okay with that. I'm sorry, I disagree. Don't debate about me on this though, just please don't. I really think the LGBT should just stick up for themselves for once and call the cops. Maybe it's not easy, but I am here to help out whenever someone is needed. This involves NOT harming the innocent and shoving their beliefs down others' throats. Sorry, my mind has not changed and I don't want to debate about this.

Scapegoat #fundie rr-bb.com

[After I disagreed with him that Obama was a communist muslim, and stated that I had seen him with the 'Obama turban' picture as an avatar]

I think this thread is valuable. Semo and Machiavelli have provided great insight into the difference between a liberal and a conservative. A brief general summary (but by no means complete list) is:

Conservatives like facts. Conservatives use facts to build and support arguments. Liberals consider facts to be annoying and irrelevant.

Conservatives judge people according to their ideas and actions. Liberals judge people according to skin color.

Conservatives don't care about skin color. Liberals seem obsessed with skin color and bring it up regularly even when it has nothing to do with the subject.

Conservatives like to understand. Liberals like to muddy conversation with non-sequiturs and rambling so nothing can be understood. This is then presented as "Intellectualism."

Semo and Machiavelli.... Thank you for helping clarify these differences so well.

white_usa_ #racist stormfront.org

No, we are not recruiting liberals in this thread. Instead, we are transforming them into White Nationalists by eliminating the effects of brainwashing perpetrated by perfidious Jews.

The so-called ‘racial equality’ is a weapon Jews are using to destroy white societies.

To liberate white minds from the effects of Jewish brainwashing we must first destroy Jewish egalitarian ideology.

In this thread we expose ‘racial equality’ as a gigantic lie by demonstrating that nonwhites belong to genetically inferior races.

White liberals read this and realize that they were gullible, wrong on all these issues and worst of all, that they supported the destruction of their own people. Shame on them!

Fortunately, armed with the knowledge they absorb in this thread liberals figure everything out and change their horrific behavior: ’I will no longer be a race traitor! I am now a WN!’

Consequently, we are not recruiting liberals, but WNs.

This is how it works.

image

We first show this disturbing image to white liberals and ask them: Does this creature look like an ape or human?

Well, “it” has features of both apes and humans because aboriginals represent a transitional species between apes and humans. Technically speaking they are sub-human or Untermensch.

Everybody, including liberals agree with this assessment, because it is self-evident.

Okay, then we ask liberals: Do you think that only 1-2 million aboriginals in Australia are profoundly subhuman, but the remaining 7 billion+ ‘people’ are miraculously all at the same level of evolutionary development?

Of course not! Pigmies and bushmen are also subhuman. What about the Bantus? Perhaps borderline human. Maybe? No?

Cross that—Sub-Saharan Africans, particularly Congolese are also subhuman!

Then we discuss Dravidians that are vastly genetically inferior but not subhuman. Indonesians? The same thing.

So liberals finally realize that various races, subraces and mongrels are all part of a comprehensive racial hierarchy.

Racial hierarchy looks like a pyramid, with subhumans at the bottom. As you climb the pyramid, nonwhite ethnicities have ever higher percentage of humanity.

At the very top resides genetically vastly superior white race!

But make no mistake: All nonwhites, without exception, are genetically inferior beings!

So a white liberal reads this and goes: ‘I get it! If nonwhites are genetically inferior, then we must not mingle with them, because they will degrade our racially superior Aryan genetic pool with their retrograde genetics, right?’

That’s right! We don’t want them anywhere near our race, because their genetic inferiority transforms them into racial parasites. Nonwhites are absolutely worthless to us!

For example, I bet you that 10-20 white liberals reading this are nodding their heads in agreement: This makes perfect sense! Lying Jews have managed to fool me, but now I get it!

So they join our ranks.

This is the template we will use going forward to win this fight and liberate our people!

Makes sense?

Ayo Kimathi #fundie waronthehorizon.com

Black Brothers and Sisters worldwide, it’s time for a change! The Black Race is the oldest, strongest, wisest, and most beautiful Race of people this planet has ever known. And it’s long past time that we become a living reflection of who and what we are by nature – Righteous Rulers. We may not be perfect, but at our best we are certainly the closest thing we can imagine to being so.

It’s time to pick ourselves up and race towards greatness. We have no more time for pity, self-doubt, depression, laziness, and/or backwardness. It’s time to shed the skin of self-hatred and Racial suicide. It’s time to stand strong for Afrikan/Black culture and create a world that our children can feel safe in. It’s time to purge our communities of european sexual insanity. We have to educate our youth to move from the bottom of the global Racial hierarchy to the very top.

Our great leader and eternal ruler of Afrika, the Most Honorable Marcus Mosiah Garvey, told us that we would see him again in the world wind. And that world wind is here. His vision and goal of an internationally-unified Race of Afrikan people is right around the corner. The seeds of global Afrikan unity are blossoming and this generation of Race men and women will not allow anything to stand in the way of our movement for power and Black Racial dominion.

Listen to the inspirational words of President Yahya Jammeh of Gambia in West Afrika as he fights for the rise of his nation. In this particular instance, he is an example to all Afrikan leaders and people worldwide of what the 21st Century is supposed to look like for Black people.

This is just an early example of what the 21st Century will look like for Black people. We are going to repair the relationship between the Black man and woman worldwide. Black men will fight to gain the respect of our women and children. Black women will become the world examples of dignity, self-respect, beauty, intelligence, etc . . . Black children will outpace every other Race of people on this planet in technology, building infrastructure, food production, entertainment, economic development, and military warfare.

And in 2015, an international movement that will capture the imagination of every decent Black man, woman, and child on this planet will sweep through this planet. 2015 is the year that the Straight Black Pride Movement (SBPM) will become the movement that shapes the future of the Afrikan world. Under this banner, we will triple our population before the close of this century and be in position to protect the interests of Afrikan people worldwide.

This is a movement designed to synthesize the interests of Black people worldwide in a tangible and meaningful way. There are (3) pillars that mark the criteria for involvement:

1. You must be a heterosexual (straight) Black person who is definitively against “homosexuality”, pedophilia, bestiality, etc . . .

2. You must be a Black person whose mother and father are Black. Mulattoes cannot be actual members of this movement.

3. You must be proud of your Afrikan heritage and your Blackness and demonstrate this pride in your behavior.

Guzman (aka Supersport) #fundie rantsnraves.org

[Do you accept the fact that genes control skin color (as well as the color of hair and eyes)?]

No...genes are the ultimate cause of nothing. Genes are the end result of a deeper cause. Genes, however, do play a role in change. Just as a car is involved in the process of rolling down the street, it is not in itself the cause -- the driver is.

Dr. Charles F. Hollsworth #racist psychologytoday.com

I agree with the Anonymous poster. As a white, Englishman and a Doctor of Medicine, I hold no biases regarding races, but the fact of the matter is that they do indeed exist. People of African descent are the "master" race from which all races derive from. Anyone who is not black skinned with woolly hair is inferior for the lack of a better word. White skin and straight hair have no biological use or advantage. Black Africans can survive the elements of Europe just as easily as White Europeans can. The reverse, however, is not the case. White Europeans would simply perish in the presence of the sun.

The evolutionary biologists' claim that white skin "evolved" due to climate is absurd. Gould himself said that 50,000 years is not enough time for any significant evolution to take place, yet he subscribes these absurdities. The gene involved in white skin has always existed in the human gene pool, but has a very low probability of expression. In fact it’s a throwback gene found not only in earlier hominids, but in fish. It isn’t a mutation, but a defect in one of the genes involved in producing melanin. (Washington Post "Scientists Find A DNA Change That Accounts For White Skin")

Caucasians are a byproduct of inbreeding. The geographical isolation of Caucasians forced them to breed with their own family members. This is why the Caucasian gene pool is much smaller in comparison to the African gene pool. Incest gives rise to all kinds of genetic disorders found high frequencies among Europeans, but almost non-existent in African populations. Inbreeding is also responsible for the Caucasian phenotype, which upon close examination is remarkably similar to other primates. Chimpanzees and other low-order primates resemble Caucasians in hair texture, narrow features, thin lips, large outer ears, and hairy bodies. Perhaps, the most notable similarity Caucasians have with primates is their very large supraorbital ridge or brow ridge. (Wikipedia, Supraorbital_ridge)

Africans have very little body hair, dark skin, full lips, small close-set outer ears, and woolly hair. Woolly hair is a recent adaptation and probably the first to disappear with inbreeding. It is probably a mutation to stave off lice, a major disease carrier as witnessed in the Bubonic plague of Europe. As our hominid ancestors evolved, they lost body hair and gained pigmentation to combat the effects of the sun. I’ve done a bit of obstetrics in the past and I’ve noticed how babies seem to conform to this phylogenetic path. African babies are born with light skin, straight hair and as the days go by, the hair becomes woolly and the skin darkens. Clearly, this is yet more proof that the African is the ideal homo sapien.

Regardless, environment plays a much greater role than genetics. Caucasians are able to survive the elements because of advances in cleanliness, technology, etc. Thus, we should take good care of mother earth, since we are least able to survive her wrath.

GodsChild #fundie helives.com

I'm guessing you might be referring back to Darwins theory about humans evolving from ape. Ok How could this be true? If it happened over a long period of time how could it not die or sumthin? Reasons or questions:1.Another thing why is their apes still around? 2.Why didn't all of them evolve? 3.Did me and you evolve from apes? No! 4.Why do sum woman have children if they are just waiting for more people to evolve? 5. If you were mid-man mid-ape what would happen to your eyes and other organs? 6.If you were evolving from ape what would you eat? 7.How would you survive? 8.If your were mid-man mid-ape how would you reproduce? 9.If you were evloving how would man learin language? 10. If apes had a certain lifespan and humans have a certain lifespan How long would it take before they died before completely evolving? 11. There are many different kinds of people today (Chinese,African American,Filipino,Laocian etc.) How did these skin colors and such come to be if we evolved? 12. How would we have different skin colors and eye colors and hair colors if we evolved? 13. Who would we evolve form apes? Why not elephants or some other animal? 14. How come humans aren't evolving still today? 15.Did apes all over evolve? In different countries?

RageAgainstTDL #racist #crackpot incels.co

The Official Male Looks Race Hierarchy is White > Black > Latin/Arab > Curry > Rice > Abo

1) White

* Best features overall
* Bright skin creates powerful contrast
* Colorful eyes and hair
* Tall, big frames, good muscle genetics
* Big dicks

2) Black

* Ugly features but masculinity is off the charts
* Scariest most intimidating men possible
* Tall, big frames, low body fat, good muscle genetics, athletic
* Biggest dicks

3) Latin/Arab

* Look white enough in many ways to be "acceptable"
* Shorter than whites/blacks
* Some Arabs get colorful eyes
* Great hairlines

4) Curry

* Shitty skin color (literally)
* Some have colorful eyes but most don't
* Good hairlines
* Some have good noses and jawlines.
* Short, unathletic, shitty body fat, small dicks

5) Rice

* Sickly yellow skin color
* Black eyes, black hair, basically all look the same
* Good hairlines
* Bulbous noses and weak jaws
* Short, unathletic, shitty body fat, small dicks, hairless & look perpetually prepubescent

6) Abo

* No discernable positive features


That's about it.

Any questions?

Issac #fundie yecheadquarters.org

Science says we have different skin colors because that was our skin adapting to our environment. Africans are dark because they lived in a hot sunny climate. Sounds feasible. But Eskimos are dark skinned also. And they live in a cold climate. So adaptation does not explain this. So does the Bible explain this? Yes it does.

When God separated the people at the tower of Babel for their ignorance of wanting to challenge him. I believe he separated them according to kind (color or race). We all had one language, so he separated them by mixing up their language. So the different kinds went and lived in different places because they could not communicate with one another (each race) anymore. We all may have different accents to our languages. But when it comes to races, we have all different languages. Some may have to go back where they come from to find this. But it all traces back to the tower of Babel. So it has nothing to do with adaptation for the reason that different races live in different places around the world and have different skin colors.

When we understand how God did things, it makes us better understand the reason for why things are the way they are. And when we accept God's word for what it is, it all becomes clear.

Nico Dacumos #fundie everydayfeminism.com

The article title is "Should Light-Skinned People of Color Voluntarily Exclude Ourselves from People of Color Spaces?"

Wouldn’t it be amazing if you could get all the cool stuff that Black, Indigenous and People of Color (BIPOC) get? Like…

Richly artistic cultures that have been setting trends in music, dance, art, and fashion for hundreds of years
Ancient and powerful cultural and spiritual practices passed down through generations
Seasoned food

Without all the problems like…

Disproportionate incarceration and extrajudicial murder
Higher incidence of low self-esteem, depression, and suicide
Decreased life expectancy

There is a way to get lots of the good stuff and avoid lots (but not all) of the bad stuff!

It’s called being light-skinned or white-passing!

Really though. Don’t get mad, my fellow light-skinned and white-passing BIPOC. I’m not saying that we don’t face many of the same problems as other BIPOC. But it’s ridiculous to deny the fact that our experiences are easier than darker-skinned people’s.

There are too many concrete statistics to the contrary.

To be fair, us light-skinned and white-passing people cannot just snap our fingers and nullify colorism. We cannot return our privilege to the Privilege Store.

But, there are some things we can do to address our privilege, like not automatically assuming that we are entitled to be in all BIPOC spaces all the time.
Are Separate Spaces Based on Race Racist?

Dig, if you will, the picture:

A group of gazelles gathers by the watering hole to strategize about how to avoid being eaten by lions. Also just to kick it and admire each other’s stripes and horns.

A group of lions gathers on the plains to strategize about how to catch and eat gazelles more effectively. Also, just to play a round of golf and talk about wealth management.

Lions find out about gazelles gathering together and get very upset, calling the gazelle’s separatist meeting unfair and reverse speciesist. They demand that lions be able to attend gazelle meetings!

After all, aren’t gazelles allowed to attend lion meetings? It’s just a coincidence that gazelles who attend lion meetings sometimes get mauled and eaten.

You think I’m being funny but I’m not.

See, the way that this society is set up, Black, Indigenous and People of Color — especially those who are Black and Brown with darker skin tones — spend an inordinate amount of time trying to avoid the dangers of racism that are instigated by white people.

Meanwhile, the reaction of your typical white person to BIPOC expressing the levels of anxiety and terror they must manage while navigating emotionally, economically and physically violent white supremacist spaces is ¯\_(?)_/¯.

Pop Quiz!

In this context ¯\_(?)_/¯ means:

IDGAF
Hands thrown up incredulously as if to say, “I don’t know understand why you feel that way! I don’t see color!”
“Why couldn’t Kanye just accept that Taylor was the better artist? What’s the problem?”
All of the above.

Answer Key

Why, when BIPOC decide to gather for various reasons in the face of a society that systematically seeks to subjugate them, is it such a problem for white people?

Could it be that white people are afraid of what could happen if BIPOC divested from white institutions and ways of being and sought self-determination and independence instead?

BIPOC throughout history have spent much time and energy building our own spaces only to be met with disapproval, petty meddling, violent threats and horrific violence.

In the face of all this, BIPOC have even taken the time to explain to white people and our own people why it is okay and possibly advantageous to have separate spaces.

Yet we still encounter white people who want to know why it’s okay for BIPOC to gather but not okay for white people to form their own separate groups.

Problem is when white people gather separately we end up with groups like the KKK, Stormfront and the Trump White House (please avoid ‘splaining about how the cabinet is not actually completely white).

Bottom line: When life, wellness, and happiness are at stake, Black, Indigenous and People of Color have a right to gather without white people in order to address issues that are important to them.

Or even just to gather socially without the fear or inconvenience of having to worry about whether white people will insult them or act awkward.

Similarly, darker-skinned BIPOC may also desire spaces where they can process and organize around the unique issues they face because of their closer proximities to Black and Indigenous skin tones and facial features and that us lighter-skinned people do not have to worry about.
I’m Stalling

It’s easy to create a funny and provocative headline before you have to actually write it. Then you talk about it with people and realize that everyone has so many feelings. But feelings are okay, even my own, so let’s keep going.
Psst… I’m Not Making This Issue Up

In some areas, separate spaces are simply not possible because of lack of large populations of BIPOC. So this question is a moot point.

However, I have lived in the San Francisco Bay Area for the last 11 years, a place considered a mecca for social justice activism and vibrant BIPOC culture. I have been a part of many groups and events organized exclusively for BIPOC.

And every time I have been a part of putting together or attended such a gathering, the issue of whether very light-skinned or white-passing BIPOC should attend has come up.

At the very least, people have expressed annoyance that white-passing people seem to feel entitled to BIPOC spaces and/or get upset if someone questions whether they are BIPOC.

While some might argue that such comments are petty or inconsequential, I think it’s worth taking a pause to consider any issues that darker-skinned BIPOC bring up regarding colorism.

Besides, these tensions make sense since they arise out of the reality that colorism has been present since the first times Black and Indigenous women were raped by white men during colonization and slavery and then gave birth to mixed-race children.

To this day, light-skinned and white-passing BIPOC still receive economic and social advantages over their darker brethren despite all the writing, scholarship and discussion around colorism that is out there.

It must be very frustrating to know that someone of the same race as you can enjoy benefits that you cannot access and to know that they never have to worry about things that you worry about every day simply because of the lightness of their skin and facial features that are considered “finer” — AKA more European.

It might also feel startling to walk into a space that was advertised as BIPOC-only and see blond-haired, blue-eyed people who look whiter than the marshmallows in an Ambrosia salad.

Rather than being defensive or complaining about how we are being excluded from spaces, light-skinned and white-passing people might take a moment to think about what the impact of our presence is in the spaces that we inhabit.

Because let’s face it, us light-skinned and white-passing BIPOC — especially those with white parent/s — still get pretty defensive sometimes when BIPOC vent about the racism or poke fun at the cultural habits of white people.

Other BIPOC don’t really deserve to have to deal with our growing pains of sensitivity, defensiveness, and fragility when they were hoping to be in spaces that are safe from racist or colorist microaggressions.
Appearance Vs. Identification

Because identity is considered deeply personal, we are discouraged from questioning another person’s identity.

Being able to determine whether someone appears to be Black, Indigenous or a Person of Color is complicated and contested, and often depends on many different factors and contexts. For example, some BIPOC may only be seen as such when they are with other BIPOC.

But the examples of former NAACP leader Rachel Dolezal and respected Indigenous Studies scholar Andrea Smith, people who were enriched through claiming BIPOC identities even though they may not have any BIPOC ancestry, have highlighted that there might be a problem with uncritically accepting self-identification.

However, we know that one’s race and skin tone determines material factors such as health, income, and life expectancy, so to pretend that how one is perceived by the world at large has no correlation to how one might choose to identify doesn’t make sense either.

If a person has a BIPOC parent or grandparent and looks white, is treated as a white person, and was raised culturally white for most of their life with little exposure to other BIPOC, where does one draw the line?

Part of the problem may be that in the US we tend to talk as if race, ethnicity, and culture are equivalent, rather than related.

For example, a person can have mostly white European ancestry but due to their family immigrating to a Latin American country, may have been raised Latinx and strongly identify with Latinx culture.

Generally, Latinx people in the US are considered BIPOC. So a person with mostly European ancestry could be BIPOC in this instance and may show up to the next Black and Brown kick back wearing hoop earrings and a huipil blouse.

Does this section make you feel uncomfortable? It makes me feel uncomfortable! Maybe that means we are getting somewhere.

Or maybe it just means that this is a fraught subject. No one wants to go around policing membership into BIPOC-ness when it was white supremacy that created these imaginary categories in the first place.
These Final Thoughts Will Probably Not Feel Very Satisfying But They Are Important

Should you exclude yourself from people of color spaces as a light-skinned or white-passing person?

I can’t answer that for you. There may be no answer.

However, problems arise when us light-skinned and white-passing BIPOC fail to ask ourselves this question or freak out when others ask it.

Next time, before entering a BIPOC space, I would like to encourage light-skinned and white-passing people to read this helpful article by transpinay philosopher b. binaohan and consider the following questions:

Why do I want to be a part of these spaces?

Is it solely to be accepted, to be reassured by other BIPOC that I belong?

Is it to build community with the loved ones and inner circles of people who constitute the spaces in which we might have the most impact in our work to change the world?

Is it to hold space and compassion for the anger and resentment that darker-skinned Black and Indigenous people might have as a result of bearing the brunt of white supremacy’s abuses?

Is it to build solidarity with BIPOC communities so that we can fight injustice together?

Is it to move back by not dominating discussions and not rushing to take on leadership roles that could be filled by darker-skinned people?

Is it to humbly ask what we can contribute to the struggle?

Is to strategize around how we can use our perceived proximity to whiteness in order to destabilize white Supremacy?

***

I think you know where I’m going with all this, right? Humility, compassion, and patience are traits all people to strive toward, but it may just be a prerequisite for those of us with more power seeking connection, support, and solidarity from our communities.

Feeling entitled to space and the emotional labor of reassurance or favorable treatment is what often gives us light-skinned and white-passing BIPOC a bad name.

So keep this in mind — it may just be the reason why your people give you side-eye when you walk into a room.

comsic justice #racist godlikeproductions.com

Is skin color an indicator of karma?

Why is it that all the third world sh*tholes are populated by dark-skinned people while all the best, 1st world countries are populated by light-skinned people? Prof. Lynn's 'IQ & the wealth of nations' found there's a correlation between skin color & IQ, wealth, beauty, etc...

The Bhagavad Gita states, 'Only demonic [degenerate] souls are born into non-aryan bodies!" Also, "Outer is a reflection of inner" (i.e. if you're ugly on the outside its because you're ugly on the inside)..."Everybody is born into the body they deserve" (based on karma).

The ancient Aryans had a caste system - caste literally means 'color' -- restricting the top positions in society to light-skinned people only & the shittiest jobs to the darkest.

The Theosophists believe the negro race was created as punishment for many generations of degenerate behavior such as sodomy & bestiality. Makes sense to me!

Fading Light #racist stormfront.org

Who is stupid enough to think our problem with non-Whites is their skin color?

Once about every seven seconds, some libtard wanders in to our forums and asks us how we can "discriminate based on skin color."

Setting aside, for the moment, the monumental ignorance associated with pretending race is just skin color, do you anti-White nitwits really believe that's our issue here? Do you really tell yourselves that if all the violent Negroes out there just jumped into a vat of peach-colored paint, we'd suddenly ignore all the hurt they have inflicted on our people? ("Well they still attack us fifty times more often than we do them, but we like the new upholstery so we'll let it slide." )

This is apparently what you believe. It's astonishing to me that ANYONE could be that big of a retard, let alone that there are vast herds of you flatulent cretins out there operating motorized vehicles and being allowed to vote.

Over and over we discuss the ongoing ethnic replacement of Whites in the very nations they founded and built, the freely admitted agenda of the left to blend our race out of existence for all time, only to be interrupted every time by one of these androgynous morons lambasting us for "hating other people because of their skin color."

There is currently no word in the English language to describe that degree of idiocy, but I would like to propose one: LIBERAL.

Kathy M #racist amren.com

[Cheerios depicts an interracial family in its Superbowl ad.]

Adorable little girl? What is it? It isn't White. What I see is a Euro/African hybrid. A European who has mixed her genes with the primitive genes of an African. The offspring has a muted nature. It is unnatural.

Clarence Henderson #fundie charlotteobserver.com

Let us be clear: HB2 cannot be compared to the injustice of Jim Crow. In fact, it is insulting to liken African Americans’ continuing struggle for equality in America to the liberals’ attempt to alter society’s accepted norms.

Recently, U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch compared HB2 to Jim Crow. Jim Crow laws were put into place to keep an entire race positioned as second-class citizens. HB2 simply says that men and women should use the restroom of their biological sex in government buildings and schools. This comparison is highly offensive and utterly disrespectful to those families and individuals who have shed blood and lost lives to advance the cause of civil rights. I take this as a personal slap in the face because I was an active participant in the civil rights movement.

In 1960, I participated in the sit-in at the Woolworth Diner in Greensboro. As a student attending North Carolina A&T University, I experienced the cruel, vicious reality of segregation first hand.

During the Jim Crow Era, we stared down the nozzle of firehoses, felt the piercing bite of police dogs, dangled from trees after being strung up by an angry mob, all because of the color of our skin. Our businesses were burned, churches bombed, communities destroyed, all because of the color of our skin. We had to drink at separate water fountains, shop at different stores and even had to sit at the back of the bus, all because of the color of our skin. All this and more took place after enduring 400 years of arguably the most heinous crime in history – slavery.

In comparison, transgender individuals do not have to fight dogs, can shop anywhere and can use any water fountain. They are free to work, shop and ride the bus. And to my knowledge, they have not experienced 400 years of slavery and the ongoing fight for parity 151 years after emancipation.

It is a further insult that the left chooses to ignore the continued absence of African Americans at the top levels of corporate America including the companies that took a public stand against HB2. Look at their boards of directors and executive teams. Where are the African Americans? Women? Transgender people? To them, I say fix these problems in your own house.

Loretta Lynch’s political pandering to arouse African American interest in what has been proven to be lukewarm support for the supposed Democratic presidential candidate is an obvious attempt to elicit an emotional response. You cannot pimp the civil rights movement.

Throughout my life, I have noticed that even smart people say dumb things. And you, Ms. Lynch, have once again proven me right. Well done.

various commenters #racist breitbart.com

(On an article about Al-Shabaab using "beautiful women" as spies)

(Darth Awesome)
Whoopie Goldberg is a spy?

(ImRealistic)
The article said BEAUTIFUL women !

(Robin)
I'm guessing beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

(Flyover Al in CT)
eye of the beheader

(Some)
there are many beautiful women in Somalia and Ethiopia.

(Anti-Matter)
You means the ones that aren't sitting in the dirt letting their children die from the flies?

(Max Twice)
White and Asian women don't live in Somalia and Ethiopia.

(ArkonaRus)
LOL, well, I do like Asian and Mestizo women too. Even some mullattos. Although Id want white children only.
But not attracted to dark skinned black women. Just like how they are typically not attracted to pale white men.

(Barack Obama Sucks)
Its the blue eyes that mestizo women love and are attracted to. Just ask my wife.

(Bob)
Putting lipstick on your goat doesn't make it beautiful

(ArkonaRus)
Not my type. And if that sounds "racist" then so be it. Just not attracted to dark skinned Africans (light skinned African Americans yes, such as Tyra Banks for example). But I can understand why Africans would be attracted to dark sinned African women.

(Dakawn Vick)
I also understand why they're obsessed with white women. Maybe Al Kebab is hiring progressive liberal white college girl whores? They LOVES "people of colour" and can assuage them some white guilt!

(CB236)
No pics of these "Beautiful Women." You know what they say, "beauty is in the eye of the beholder."

(CMG MAGA)
They mean goats.

(mahgan)
The larger point here is that Somalia and Al Shabab are just another sad example of stupid slave blacks enslaved and bewitched by vile, wicked and stupid Arab Islam.

They are so stupid and dumb that they couldn't even invent a religion for themselves.

(Roger V)
That is indeed the bottom line - there is no REDEEMING quality to islam - the ONLY chance of redemption for the followers of this despicable cult of islam is to accept the Gospel and Jesus

(Ward)
There's no such thing as a beautiful Somalian. Total fake news.

(Zatoichi)
Actually, seeing every Somalian in the USA on a boat heading home would be quite a beautiful sight.

(oneMotime)
Luv ur side caption!
White lives DOES matter, or back to cave days!

amanda2324 #fundie comments.deviantart.com

It is not only offensive, but completely wrong to compare sexuality to skin color. One is a useful attribute for survival (skin color), one is not. One is something that is clearly visible /and/ is a physical reality; one is not.

Further, the experiences of the two groups are different. Have homosexuals ever been enslaved? No. Have they ever had their personhood denied? No. Do their parades attract hundreds of police officers who will beat them within an inch of their lives, and the courts and other police officers do nothing about it? No. Have homosexuals ever been forced to go to different restrooms, different drinking fountains, different schools, etc? No. Have they ever been disallowed to vote? No. Have they ever been disallowed to own property? No.

So it is offensive to a lot of people because blacks, as a group, had it like 10000000 times worse than homosexuals have ever had it as a group.

The worst thing they can whine about is that they can't get a piece of paper from the government that declares them "married." That's just NOT equivalent to being enslaved and legally able to be beaten /to death/. Hence why it's offensive to do the comparison. It's not valid, it's absolutely and totally incorrect, and makes their claims seem hyperbolic and childish.


Yes, other places in the world; no here. So here, in the US, what they are doing is in fact whining. None of their whining and lobbying here does a single, not even miniscule, thing for anyone who participates in same-sex erotic behavior anywhere else in the world. So, yeah. What they are doing here, in this country, is only whining. They may NOT, EVER use the suffering of people in OTHER countries as a means of obtaining anything /here/.

[ The point is that, in essence, both groups have been historically persecuted for something that is innate to their being, and that's why it is not an offensive comparison to make. ]

False. Homosexuality as a concept did not exist until within the last, according to my faulty memory, 60 years. Same-sex erotic BEHAVIOR is /not/ innate to anyone's being, and is the /actual/ thing that's ever been criminalized with death. And guess what? No one /has/ to participate or initiate same-sex behavior. It's not an innate part of their being. Now, skin color, which is neither a behavior nor something they can hide, is an entirely different matter.

[ Attempting to trivialise the persecution of gay people because their sexuality is not "clearly visible" is laughably superficial. ]

I never trivialized the persecution of gay people because sexual orientation isn't visible. I've trivialized in only in the sense that I've put it into perspective with groups of people who've actually had to deal with /real/ oppression and discrimination. So, in fact, I haven't trivialized anything. You and your false and ignorant comparisons trivialize /real/ cases of horrid discrimination and oppression

[ When the holocaust ended, people who were in there for racial issues where released.

The allies never released the homosexuals, because they saw nothing wrong with people being imprisoned for being gay, and many, many lgbt people are killed, even to this day.

So get fucked. ]


Due to your use of vulgar language, I can tell you're not here for an intelligent, rational discussion.

Lions of Israel #fundie therealjewsareblack.com

Jews vs. Israelites

Q) ARE THE SO-CALLED NEGROES IN AMERICA AFRICANS? NO!
A) THEY ARE THE REAL HEBREW ISRAELITES (JEWS)!

Read Exodus 11:7 "...That ye may know that the Lord doth put a difference between the Egyptians and Israel. It's not about COLOR it's about BLOODLINE. The Africans (dark skinned people) descend from Ham;
read Genesis 10:6 while the Israelites come from Shem, Genesis 10:22 (chapter 11 shows the lineage from Shem to Abraham). THE REAL JEWS ARE BLACK (referring to people of brown color) ACCORDING TO THE BIBLE.
Read Jeremiah 14:2 - "Judah mourneth (in sorrow) and the gates (the leaders) thereof languish (grow weaker), they are black unto the ground (meaning different shades of brown).
Read Isaiah 29:22 "...Jacob (Israel) shall not now be ashamed, neither shall his face now wax pale (meaning the Jews would never be Caucasians). We went into slavery because we broke the laws of THE MOST HIGH,
read Deuteronomy 28:15-68. (Read verse 68 especially; it describes the Israelites being sold into slavery by way of "ships") And the Lord shall bring thee into Egypt (bondage) again with SHIPS, by the way whereof I spake unto thee, Thou shall see it (Jerusalem the homeland) no more again: and there ye shall be sold unto your ENEMIES (the whiteman) for bondmen and bondwomen (slaves), and no man shall buy (save) you.

THE ONLY WAY TO GET OUT OF THE CURSES IS TO REPENT AND KEEP THE LAWS. Read Deuteronomy 28:1-14, 2 Chronicles 7:14.

Q) IS CHRIST A SO-CALLED NEGRO ACCORDING TO THE BIBLE?
A) YES!

Read: Hebrews 7:14 - 'For it is evident that our Lord sprang out of Judah; of which tribe Moses spake nothing concerning priesthood'.
Jeremiah 14:2, Revelation 1:1, 13-15, Daniel 10:5-6: ALL OF THE PROPHETS THAT WROTE THE BIBLE WERE OF SO-CALLED NEGROID OR SO-CALLED INDIAN DESCENT.
Also read Lamentations 4:2, 8, Job 30:30, Song of Solomon 1:5-6, Jeremiah 8:21, Exodus 4:4, 6-7, Acts 21:37-39. THEY CALLED THE DISCIPLES NIGER!
Read: Acts 13:1 "NIGER" is a latin word that means black (refering to people of brown color.

Does Jesus (Yahawashi) color matter? Yes. Do not let any wolf-in-sheep clothing, slick willy, preacher in a cheap suit fool you.

Read: St. John 8:32, 17:17, 4:24: If Christ color doesn't matter why do all the ghetto churches in the hood (especially in the south) have a image of a white Jesus. For hundreds of years he was potrayed as being 'white' but as soon as the truth comes out that he is a very dark skinned negro all of a sudden color doesn't matter. CHRIST IS A BLACK MAN - accept it or not the truth is the truth. The brothers in the street teaching the Word will testify that the people who have a hard time accepting this is not the so-called white people or other nations; it's the so-called blacks and hispanics (Israelites) in the ghettos of Amerikkka. Read Hosea 4:6 - "My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy GOD, I will also forget thy children."

Other negroes (JEWS) in history: King James, Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Shakespeare, the pharoahs of Egypt from the 14th to the 18th dynasties, King Author and the Knights of the round table, Robin Hood, Beethoven, Constantin the great, Spartacus, Hannibal, and Nostradamus just to name a few, whose true images have been changed and white washed.

Q) DOES THE HOLY BIBLE PROPHESY THE ENSLAVEMENT OF THE 12 TRIBES OF ISRAEL?
A) YES!

Read: Deuteronomy 28:15, 47-48, and especially 68: "And the Lord shall bring thee into Egypt again with ships, by the way whereof I spake unto thee, Thou shalt see it no more again: and there ye shall be sold unto your enemies for BONDMAN (slave men) and BONDWOMAN (slave women), and no man shall buy (save) you. When you research the original name of the land of Egypt, it was called MIZRAIM. It is a Greek word meaning BONDAGE.
Read Exodus 20:2: We went into slavery because we broke the laws of The Most High (YHWH) and the only way to get out of the hellish conditions that we are in is to come back to the laws, statutes, and commandments of The Most High.
Read 2Chronicles 7:14: Instead of humbling ourselves, confessing our transgressions, and coming back to The Most High (YHWH) we still continue in our wicked ways, and continue to follow esau (the white man) the devil and father of all lies. Our people are rebellious and stiffhearted (read Ezekiel 2:3-6).

Q) WHAT MUST THE 12 TRIBES OF ISRAEL DO TO SURVIVE AS A NATION?
A) RETURN TO THE HOLY LAWS, STATUTES, COMMANDMENTS & GATHER TOGETHER

Read: Zephaniah 2:1 "Gather yourselves together, yea, gather together, O nation not desired",
Isaiah 34:16 "Seek ye out of the book of the Lord, and read: no one of these shall fail, none shall want her mate: for my mouth it hath commanded, and his spirit it hath gathered them".
Also read: Job 8:8, Deuteronomy 32:7, 2 Chronicles 7:14, Jeremiah 4:1, Malachi 3:7-18, 1st John 3:10-24, and Zephaniah 3:8 "Therefore wait ye upon me, saith the Lord, untill the day that I rise up to the prey: for my determination is to gather the nations, that I may assemble the kingdoms, to pour upon them mine indignation, even all my fierce anger: for all the earth shall be devoured with the fire of my jealousy."

Q) WHO ARE THE TWELVE TRIBES OF ISRAEL TODAY?
A) See Below...
1. JUDAH.................AFRICAN AMERICANS
2. BENJAMIN............WEST INDIANS
3. LEVI....................HAITIANS
4. SIMEON...............DOMINICANS
5. ZEBULON.............GUATEMALA TO PANAMA
6. EPHRAIM.............PUERTO RICANS
7. MANASSEH..............CUBANS
8. GAD.........................AMERICAN INDIANS
9. REUBEN...................SEMINOLE INDIAN
10. NAPHTALI...............ARGENTINA
11. ASHER.....................COLUMBIA TO URUGUAY
12. ISSACHER...............MEXICANS

Fading Light #racist stormfront.org

The Importance of Appearances to Opponents of White Nationalism

I was recently watching the video made from a broadcast by William Pierce in which he discussed the dissolution of Haiti into savagery after the Blacks committed mass genocide against the Whites who had created a high civilization there. He discussed the three occasions since that time in which Whites came back to the island and rebuilt civilization, only to end up leaving again—fortunately not due to mass murder by the Negroes on these other more recent occasions. All three times the rapid decay of civilization occurred again despite the resource-rich environment and the priceless gift of a very large head-start to proceed from, making it pretty hard for liberals to support a rational argument that the miserable state there can be blamed on Whites holding the Blacks back.

The really interesting part, however, was Pierce’s paraphrasing of Hesketh Prichard’s book, Where Black Rules White, A Journey Across and About Hayti:

“To the Haitians, the imitation of civilization is as good as the real thing. They believe that if they are able to dress like White men and speak the White man’s language and mimic the White man’s institutions, then they are as good as White men.”

Blacks, and in fact non-Whites in general, lack the intellectual capacity to comprehend the difference between form and substance. Appearances are all that matter to them. A Black man who is dressed in a suit and handed a high position in society that traditionally belongs to a White man is, in the eyes of himself and his fellow Negroes, every bit as good as a White man would be in that position simply because their inferior minds cannot comprehend the deeper requirements and necessities of filling the role.

Barack Obama is a perfect example of this. Having been handed every advantage in life out of race-pity—so many positions of power entirely unearned and unmerited—he is seen by non-Whites as a success despite being entirely bankrupt of any meaningful achievements in those positions, from his utter failure to turn out even a single paper during his time as president of the Harvard Law Review, to the over 300 roll-call votes he neglected to participate in as a U.S. senator, to the Nobel Peace Prize he was handed within days of being elected president with absolutely no accomplishment to warrant it. The suit is his success. The title is his success. His actual efforts (or lack thereof) are immaterial to them.

The truly disturbing part of all this, however, is that those same empty appearances are also just as good as the real thing to a very large group of White people: liberals. We see this every day on Stormfront, where our opponents eternal lambaste us about “discrimination based on SKIN COLOR.” Appearance is all that matters to a liberal. The idea that race involves more than skin tone is beyond their mental comprehension. A White person who is spray-painted brown has magically transmuted into a person of African descent. His genes have changed. His ancestry has been rerouted. Nothing but bewildered agitation results when we show them images of albino Negroes who are still quite obviously members of the Black race despite an exceedingly light skin tone.

This inability to fathom content over appearance is a critical element of which we must be aware if we are to understand our opponents’ methods. As childish as it seems, as embarrassingly simple-minded as it may strike us, it truly is the very core basis of their approach to solving problems. For example, under the Obama regime, the National Crime Victimization Survey has stopped tabulating crimes by race because, to anti-Whites, if the truth of Black crime can no longer be SEEN, it no longer exists. Black-on-White crimes are routinely concealed from the public by the Jew-controlled media because, to the leftists, that makes those crimes rare. The fact that this does nothing about the actual crime rates escapes their comprehension. Dzhokhar Tsarnaev and George Zimmerman were just two of the recent examples of non-Whites being portrayed in the media with photographic adjustments to make their skin lighter because, to liberals, that makes them White.

This thinking (if that word can even correctly describe it) fits with virtually every social reform the left has ever attempted or proposed. In affirmative action, the NUMBER of non-Whites employed in various fields is to be increased even though the individuals being handed these jobs are not competent to do them. Liberal teachers in secondary education have been caught repeatedly giving non-Whites passing grades even though their academic performance was below the requisite threshold because, to them, a student who is simply given an A is every bit as smart as a student who earned an A. Money is to be transferred at gunpoint to non-Whites because a large income means success even if the recipient of the income did nothing to earn it and entirely lacks the monetary skills to retain it or use it rationally.

And it goes on into every other realm of their interference: Homosexual couples are to be treated like heterosexual couples because, if they are spoken of in exactly the same way as the commitment-bearing, sane members of that greatest of Western family institutions, the enormous rates of homosexual promiscuity and venereal infection will cease to exist. Politically correct speech laws are to be imposed on us because not being allowed to say anything “offensive” is exactly the same thing as not disagreeing with liberals (according to liberals at least).

I think they are going to get an especially painful lesson from that particular mistake pretty soon. This, too, is something we hear from them constantly on Stormfront: They literally believe that if there aren’t throngs of Whites standing up and speaking against their destruction of our race and civilization, they have won the war. They honestly believe that our silence in public means we will forever comply with their agenda. It’s the cognitive attitude of a five-year-old child, but it is the very best of which they are capable.

Liberals are, in every way, the appearance people, regardless of their race: They are the ones who achieve beauty not through superior genetics, but through hair dye, breast implants, nose jobs, colored contacts, skin-whitening creams . . . and sex-change operations for their mentally ill masses who pretend that genetics changes when the outside looks different. Beauty to a liberal truly is skin deep (at least right up until the revolting, dysgenic children start popping out).

I recently watched a video in which the narrator was discussing the enormous number of instances of Black rappers whose “bling” is actually fake because, to them, wearing imitation gold jewelry made of plastic is every bit as indicative of success as being able to afford the real thing. The video went on to cite numerous instances of camera tours of actors’ multimillion-dollar homes where it turned out that the home being shown wasn’t even actually theirs. The expensive cars they are seen in are very often rented. In a recent incident in which a Black actress’s pearl dress for the Oscars was stolen and described as being worth as much as ten million dollars, it turned out that the pearls were fake and the dress's true worth was less than $200.

The same appearances work for intelligence: Taking a Black actor and shoving him in front of a camera parroting some lines of sapient dialog makes all Blacks just as smart as Whites. A false claim on Wikipedia about performing the first ever operation separating conjoined twins turns a mediocre Black surgeon into the smartest doctor ever. A list of entirely fictitious Black (or Jewish) inventions "proves" the worth of those parasitic inferiors to White civilization. Nobel Prizes handed out for political reasons make Jews smart. An empty assertion about "jobs Americans just won't do" (whatever the heck that even means) makes illegal invaders from Mexico a boon to our economy. I would bet a quadrillion Zimbabwe dollars that the subhuman citizens of that cesspit nation feel rich as they walk around bearing arm-loads of bills covered in zeroes that aren’t worth the paper they are printed on. It’s all the same thing.

So now you know why our opponents lie to us here all the time. To their weak, pathetic little minds, the lie changes reality the instant they utter it. Explains quite a lot, doesn't it!

bourbonexpert #racist voat.co

whenever a nignog argues "it cause i black ain't it!!!?" i always think of this.

I love that fucking cop out excuse...its the default answer to any challenge to their invented reality.

Ya, I dislike you and avoid you because of your skin color, it has nothing to do with your loud rude and aggressive culture that you pridefully wear on your sleeve. It has absolutely nothing to do with your total lack of concern for anyone other than yourself when listening to your shitty music loud enough to wake up my toddler in my car at the gas station, or your fucking cell phone on speaker in the morning on the bus when everyone else is reading or being quiet..

Totally has nothing to do with the reality that most people normal people wouldn't dare ask you to change your behavior because you would take it as a personal affront to your existence causing you to want to fight no matter if it was a 13 year old or a 60 year old. Nope, nothing to do with the reality that many of you in "your community" are so repulsed by gay men that you have to say "no homo" when giving another man a compliment on his clothing or hair.

It most certainly has nothing to do that if I'm walking down the street and I cross paths with more than 3 of you, there's a 90% change of you or your buddies will make an insulting comment toward me and 100% if I'm with a woman. No, none of that has anything to do with it...It's your skin color.

Give me a fucking break.

Various commenters #sexist #wingnut reddit.com

(Aug415)

In case anyone was wondering what they teach in our schools today. Taught that men don’t experience sexism today.

image

A photo of a paper entitled “Web of unequal power relations”, defining various types of prejudice and who they target

In my sociology class, the professor (who was a woman of color) taught us that not only are women the only victims of sexism, but also that people of color are the only victims of racism. She got in front of the class and said that "black people cannot be racist, only white people can be racist because they have all the power".

I was the only white person in the class and I felt so attacked.

Honestly what is wrong with education these days

My school is around 65-70% Asian. I’ve seen white classmates be harassed because of their race, and there’s nothing they can do about it. If an Asian student calls a white student “the next school shooter”, everyone laughs, and if the white kid were to reply “shut up dog eater” or some other racial stereotype, they’d be sent to the principal’s office. White students also weren’t allowed to make any European cultural groups, because apparently that would be racist. So while there’s a Black Student Union, Latinos Unidos, and 3 separate Asian clubs, the Italian and German clubs were not allowed to be made. People also act like white people still hold the power at the school, despite the student union being 100% Asian, and the school staff being majority ‘people of color’.

I am Hispanic and I hate the fact that people says that "white" people can't suffer from racism, just because you are the majority doesn't means that people can't attack you just because you are white, I have seen how being white has become in a meme of offensive "jokes" and how easy it is to say "fuck white people" and "white people be like" (follows by something humiliating).

Hispanic isn’t a race, but I agree.

(furry8)

Imagine the influence of feminism in Canada which has rached to the extent that they have been given enough power to brainwash children from young to make men live inferior life than women. More boys will turn to white knights, resort to alcohol and drugs to supress their emotions because they are made to think how masculinity is a problem.

Then people say feminism represents minority group when in reality most of the people are not against their practises.

I think you have hit the nail on the head when you say it brainwashes men throughout their lives.

Historically beautiful women could enchant men and live a very privileged existence- she receives beneficial treatment from every interaction she has with men. (my ex girlfriend would always get a discount when her car was serviced etc)

This is why we see the very ugly women fighting so hard for feminism - they always wanted the benefits of being beautiful. This is why stealing men's work comes naturally to her. Due to western governments : Now even the ugly women can get beneficial treatment.

It clearly sucks to be a poor Canadian guy. But what I have also noticed - Beautiful women are losing out due to feminism! (rarely) some of them will complain about it. E.g. we see guys who won't stop when a woman's car has broken down since they have been shown to make false allegations.

Of course, the ugly women are ecstatic about feminism.... They are the only beneficiaries

(LawUntoChaos)

Wow straight white men are just the fucking worst aren't they?

They never have anyone discriminate against them for their gender, skin color, or sexual orientation LOL fucking losers.

arrested development theme plays

Ironic isn't it, this document is an example of discrimination against men but due to the magical patriarchy it somehow doesn't count because they are so advantaged in today's society. It's not like there's large swaths of boys being left behind in school or a whole host of male victims being ignored. No, that's just completely ridiculous...

No, every male is either holding the reigns of power in a patriarchal system who has only been gifted their power by the grace of society's gendered norms (not through their own merit), how dare they hold women and minorities back! Or... They're an incel, neck beard, and their suffering is somehow their fault. Why aren't they good enough for women?! Even though Patriarchy hurts men too but you better not talk about it because you're taking away from the actual oppressed groups. Who cares about a whole generation of disillusioned and demoralised children. Nah! What's important is people's personal values and who we decide is worthy of empathy based on...

My own morally righteous assumption and a belief structure (where like everyone else, I'm making it up as I go along) that I demand you take as fact. Otherwise you are sexist/racist. If you point out my contradictions, it also means you are sexist/racist. If you talk out of turn, you disgusting white male oppressor, you are a sexist/racist. What's that? No, of course, you can't fucking win. You are a disgusting sub human filth who isn't allowed to have their oppressive opinion.

(Elfere)

Yeah... I posted once about how I was a straight white catholic married guy and that I'm proud of all those things.

Holy shit.

The amount of pure hate thrown my way... Some from people who call me a 'friend'

But it doesn't matter because, well, I'm a straight married white catholic. So therefore I've never once experienced any kind of discrimination.

Oh. And despite the fact thay all my ansectors were peasants. I'm clearly directly responsible for all slavery and religious intolerance in the history of the world.

(notacrackheadofficer)

I'm not even a Bernie fan , but that guy got played hard because so many people wanted a woman president. Women were much more interested in the war monging , rape defending, drunken cunt Hilary than him. They openly bragged their gender preference as their basis for choosing her.

(iainmf)

This seems to have come from the shift from discussing 'disadvantage' to 'privilege'.

Some research shows that if you have strong beliefs about privilege than you are less empathic to the privileged people. There was a study where they tested peoples change in attitudes after a class on white privilege and they found that rather than being more empathic to poor black people they students became less empathic to poor white people. Another study found that people who believed strongly in male privilege much more sceptical of research that showed sex differences which benefit men (ie a study that showed men were better at X). Also, a study of the trolley dilemma found that feminists were more likely to sacrifice men than the general population. It's reasonable to assume feminists believe in male privilege.

All this leads me to believe that the result of the change in the language you mentioned will be the dehumanisation of privileged groups. It possible that something like this was the intention behind the change in language based on the misguided belief that it will help the oppressed.

(CJPsalm139)

How is this not blatant propaganda to literally ANYONE?! It's literally racist, sexist, (not sure if this is a real word but it's the closest I can get) religiophobic, and all around terrible.

(littlefilms)

I'm Asian and I've been told that only white people can be racist which just feels patronising imo. First off what is the definition of racism? I always assumed it's the ignorant assumption that your race is superior than others?

So for them to say only white people can be racist, is ironically them admitting how they see white people compared to everyone else, they're basically saying only white people can realistically see themselves as superior compared to black people and it be offensive. If a white person thought they were genetically superior to a black person, I'm sure these people would see it as racist, but if a black person thought they were genetically superior, being taller/bigger, stronger, faster, well endowed, nice ass instead of a flat chicken butt etc, that's not racist? Ironically these people sound like the racists they are condemning e.g:

"only white people can be racist, because only white people can realistically think they're better than everyone, no one could possibly think a black person is superior, come on look at them they're black. Every single white person loves being white where as no one could possibly feel superior being black, what can black people be proud of? Nothing"

(robcars)

Yeah that's like saying there's no such thing as reverse discrimination. It happens all the time. I have worked at a hospital that was mostly women and they were always mean to the man and said oh you're a man you can do that you're a man you can do this. I always thought you can do the worst jobs. I started to go to nursing school and experienced excessive bias. This was even in California. The women teachers did not like men. I also had a problem with one lesbian nurse in college that was an instructor. She said men should not be doing this kind of work this is Woman's Work and men are taking good jobs from women. I complain to the dean but it did no good because she had a high pass rate on the exam. Finally I just had to drop out. Is really caused me to have a great hatred towards women. And a lack of respect towards most of them.

(topsyandpip56)

That is applied Marxism. Omg I got to live long enough to see disguised marxism taught in schools in United States.

You can find a word for anything you don;t like and say is oppression.

Precisely this. The west was warned multiple times during the cold war and long before that foreign subversion especially in relation to social justice matters would be used to install far leftist governments. This nonsense coupled with the growing influence of China on businesses is the result of ignoring the warnings or being a useful idiot.

(Jyvur_Entropy)

Yeah :/ I majored in Creative Writing and English Lit. You'd think there wouldn't be a TON of SJW talk, maybe some in works that deal with gender and race. Nah, I feel like I got a freaking gender theory degree. Every class delves into colonialism, intersectionality and such.

Higher ed also sends white women a lot of mixed messages about where they fit into this whole web of oppression. In one class, I learn that I'm so damn privileged I've got nothing to complain about. In other, I'm told that women are the 'subalterns of white people' and that, white women are also colonized, but by their husbands and fathers.

Eck. I'm sick of it all. I just wanted to talk about books! :(

(BonelessSkinless)

"I won't date you if you're not tall enough"

"I can hit you, cut you, scratch you and spit on you and you can't hit back. The second you do, I'll cry enact my double standard pussy pass power and have you arrested"

"If you're not making upwards of 70-90k a year don't talk to me. Money, money, me, me, me, money"

"Guys don't get insecure, just shut up you'll like it, you're a guy right you should feel honored to get with me"

"Your clothes aren't brand name and you don't have this whole list of qualities I want so goodbye"

"You have to pay for every meal, bill, expense and anything that comes up and I MIGHT look at your dick for 4 minutes on the weekend and I said MIGHT and that's if you clean the kitchen and give me 2 footrubs after your 12 hour shift"

You're right, we don't experience strife or sexism, silly me.

Steve Jabba #sexist #fundie #crackpot stevejabba.com

Socio Sexual Hierarchy : What Rank Are YOU?

What Is The Socio Sexual Hierarchy?
The socio sexual hierarchy was a term originally coined by Vox Day to describe where men fit on the socio sexual totem pole. Just as in nature, there is a hierarchy, where the guys at the top tend to get the most attractive women in the greatest numbers.

A key point to note is that the socio sexual hierarchy as it was originally intended was based on patterns of behaviour. These patterns of behaviour tend to lead to outcomes such as social success and success with women. We’ll get into that more later.

[…]

The Socio Sexual Hierarchy Ranks (Top To Bottom)

Alpha : Often physically imposing (tall, handsome) and confident.

[Picture of Donald Trump]

A good phrase to capture the essence of an Alpha is that they suck all the energy in a room.

The most famous example of an Alpha male that springs to mind in 2019 is president Donald Trump.

Alphas usually do very well financially and with women and alongside high functioning Sigmas tend to sleep with the most attractive women in the greatest numbers. They usually insert themselves in a social scene and dominate by virtue of their powerful personality and social skills. You’ll often find that Alphas get success with women by their place in the social hierarchy and social status.

You will rarely see Alphas that would choose to do Daygame, for example. That’s not how they meet women.
Positives : social success, financial successs, success with women.

Downsides : Alpha males care about their place in the hierarchy and are sensitive to criticism (especially from women), whereas Sigmas are indifferent. Often their focus on winning and being on top means they are prone to walking all over other people and not being mindful of other people’s feelings.
[…]
Sigma – Sigmas share some qualities with the alpha, such as self confidence, but they tend to be way more introverted and do not thrive on social attention.
[Picture of Han Solo]

They do not want to be a leader as an alpha does, and often shun social groups.

Whereas Alphas can make friends with anyone and intimately understand social hierarchies and alliances, Sigmas go their own way and usually form very close friendships with few people which tend to last for life.

The 2 key traits of the Sigma Male : Very attractive to women. Outside the hierarchy.

Because of this, Sigmas will often gravitate towards activities like Daygame, or solo game. They tend not to enjoy socialising or indeed having contact with those they don’t respect or wish to spend time with, so high functioning and intelligent Sigmas will seek to get out of the hierarchy as much as possible, by finding their own source of income that doesn’t involve having to perform a conventional job.

Sigmas do not acknowledge the social hierarchy or pay it any attention. They can be frustrating for Alphas because they tend to look them in the eye and show that they have no interest in the Alphas social status or any respect for it.

[…]

The article you are reading and all the content on my website is written by a Sigma Male (me). My book Primal Seduction and video series Secret Society explain how a Sigma can leverage his natural tendencies to get success with women.

Postitives : Do what they want, live the life they want, not affected by the opinions of others.

Downsides : Can take introversion too far and become socially isolated. Can experience periods of intense lonliness if they spend too much time alone and don’t actively approach women, which can mean long dry spells.
[…]
Beta : Betas are probably the happiest rank overall. They are like the lieutenant to the Alpha.
[Screenshot of Maverick from Top Gun]
They are also confident, but don’t have quite as much swagger and are less prone to boasting than Alpha Males. If you look at Donald Trumps famous tweets as President of the United States, it’s a fascinating insight into the mind of an Alpha. Were Trump a Beta, you’d see far less boasting and bragadocio on his Twitter feed.

Betas actually have the most stable existence with the best cost / reward ratio. They can thrive in hierarchies, they can get attractive women, and they don’t need to engage in all the risk taking and status jockeying of the Alpha. For this reason, there are far more Beta’s than genuine Alphas.

Many guys hear the expression “Beta Male” and get the wrong end of the stick. The Beta’s have a pretty sweet set up!

Advantages : happy life, high position in the socio sexual hierarchy.
Downsides : Always playing second fiddle to the alphas and they know it.

Delta : The average guy. Most men are Deltas. These are the guys that keep society running smoothly.
[Picture of a pilot from the 1980 movie Airplane!]
They tend to be average looking, with nothing particularly striking phyically or mentally (they tend to hover around the mean in terms of IQ). Think of Deltas as “worker bees”. Whilst less glamorous than their higher counterparts, they have a pretty happy existence as they are often happy with their lot.

Whilst Deltas do have some limited success with women (on average 6-10 lifetime partners or less), they do not really understand women and view them somewhat fearfully. They tend to give up on women earlier on in life and settle with a midrange woman, and are by and large happy with this arrangement, not wanting to spend too much time or energy in figuring out the opposite sex.

Advantages : They get the job done, everyone tends to like Deltas.
Downsides : Often pedestalize women, (which women really hate!).

Gamma – Probably the most disliked of all the archetypes by both men and women (Sigmas in particular cannot stand Gamma Males).
[Grima Wormtongue from Lord of the Rings]
Gammas live a life of dishonesty both to themselves and others. They construct a powerful delusion bubble and think of themselves as “Secret Kings”, who will one day get all the rewards of the Alpha when the world finds out how talented and powerful they really are.

They believe themselves to be worthy of adulation and praise (especially from women), and alternate between pedestaliation of women (usually by a girl who is unwise enough to smile at them), or outright hatred of the entire female race. Gamma rage and reality denying are a very real and scary phenomena.

They are often unattractive physically, if not because of genetics but also because they are too lazy and conceited to accept their flaws and get to work on ironing them out.

[…]
Factors That Affect Your Place In The Socio Sexual Hierarchy

Appearance : It should be pretty obvious to most but it’s worth mentioning. Your appearance does have an impact on your socio sexual ranking. The number one thing any guy can do regardless of his archetype to improve here is to get physically fit, strong and well built. I don’t think anyone would deny that muscles are a universally attractive masculine trait.

Location : Where you are in the world can affect your place in the socio sexual hierarchy. If you were born in the UK or USA (for example), you would naturally have a higher place in the socio sexual hierarchy if you moved to Bolivia (for example). This is known as geography arbitrage (actually, it isn’t , I just made that up.)

It’s not just that you would have more money than the locals. It’s that you look different and might well be perceived as exotic (there are some parts of the world where pasty white skin is considered exotic, believe it or not!)

Game : Game, or behaviour can have a big impact on your place in the socio sexual hierarchy. This is why the concept of the rank is based on patterns of behaviour rather than just physical appearance. There is no single bigger predictor of sexual success than simply upping your game (or displaying more universally attractive masculine traits), and putting yourself in front of more women.

Marksman #fundie teens-4-christ.org

[In response to the question: What about the fish? I would think that they stayed in water, and weren't taken onto the ark, but sea fish need saltwater, freshwater fish need freshwater, and when the flood came, all the water would have mixed, and become brakish. Very few fish can survive this.]

This can probably be described in many ways, but one way it would work is that salt water is more dense then fresh water, so when they are mixed the salt water sinks to the bottom, and the fresh water stays on top. So when the flood happened, the bottom half of the earth was salt water, and the top half was fresh water. I am sure many fish died, but enough of them survived by staying in their type of water(top or bottom) to reproduce after the flood.

SlaveMaster Productions #racist wckkkk.org

Racial suicide all in the name of equality is insane. In the Klan’s opinion, it shows a lack of love and caring for the White Race. The Klan believes Whites are superior to the Non-Whites. When someone comes to a Klansman and makes the comment, ‘we are all God’s creation and the only difference in the Race’s is the color of the skin’, we tell them that they are partially correct. God is the creator, and he did create us all, but there is a world of difference between the races besides skin color.

Why are so many people bent on promoting race-mixing and racial equality? Because, it is Satan’s goal to have us violate our Heavenly Father’s law on mixing our seed with the other people of the world. What use to be wrong is now right. What use to be bad is now good. Our world has been turned upside down and we have only ourselves to blame for being so gullible.

The Federal Government promotes the destruction of our race through its many programs. They require that business’ hire based on race rather than qualifications, they call this Affirmative Action. The Government supports mass Non-White integration. When the hordes of Third Worlders that enter our country can not work, they go on Welfare. The Welfare Program allows the White people to pay for the Non-White people of the Country to eat and live, while at the same time causing the White people to lack in necessary funds to have children of their own. Our race, through the Government’s power, now has the lowest birth rate. White Men and Women can not have children because they pay ‘mandatory child support’ in the name of TAXES. Our Government promotes Race-Mixing through integration. Our Children are forced to go to school with every race under the sun. They are being taught that the races are equal. When did race-relations become part of educational curriculum? Our Children are being brainwashed all in the name of ‘Humanity’.

White people have practiced segregation throughout History. It is conclusive to believe this due to the fact the White Race has flourished throughout History rather than dwindling such as we are during this time of accepted race-mixing. The inequalities of the Races have never been more apparent than that in the Bible. Here are just a few Bible scriptures:

Exodus 33:16 "So shall we be separated: I and thy people, from all the people that are upon the face of the Earth"

Leviticus 20:24 " I am the Lord they God which have separated you from other people"

Joshua 23:12-13 "If you do in any way go back and cleave unto the remnants of these Nations, even these that remain among you, and shall make marriages with them, and go in unto them and they unto you: Know for a certainty That there shall be snares and traps unto you, and scourges in your side and thornes in your eyes. Until ye perish off from this good land which the Lord your God has given you."

The list goes on and on: Deuteronomy 7:3, Proverbs 23:27, Psalm 144:11-12, Hosea 5:6-7. So We, the True Chosen people of God, the True Tribes of Israel, are commanded not to Race mix. We are NOT EQUAL IN THE EYES OF YAHWEH.

Do you recall the story in the Bible about the two cities, Sodom and Gomorrah? Well guess what, it is happening again today. Non-White cultures, Race-mixing, drug abuse, disease, Homosexuality, and criminals plague our cities. We, as a Nation of White Christians, have turned from Yahweh’s law and have embraced Satanic Order. Our punishment is the society in which we live today.

The Double Standards that the Politicians use against us is blind to many. If a White man were to stand up and pronounce his pride for his Race and his Heritage, he is called a Racist and a Bigot. However, Non-Whites are encouraged to exhibit and promote pride in their Soul-less race. Today it is even deemed socially acceptable for Homosexuals to walk down the street and pronounce their Gay Pride.

We see more and more All-Black TV programs that pollute the airwaves. Where are the White people in these Black Sitcoms? You can be sure to find a majority of the credits for these Back Sitcoms belonging to the Jews. In a Country where the Majority rules, you would think that the White Man would be in control and therefore rid this land of the evil that plagues it. But instead you have the parasitic Jew at the Head of Government. The Whites are discouraged from taking part in political events, while the Non-whites are very encouraged. This is apparent at any election time. The candidates can always be found having some sort of political rally in the Non-White sections of cities. Where as every single election, the Republican and the Democrat always promise to better the Non-White. The White man is told that it is wrong for him to belong to a pro-white organization. While at the same time it is greatly accepted for Negroes, Jews and Hispanics to belong to Pro-Race organizations. The Negroes have the NAACP watching their rights. L.U.L.A.C. is out there watching the Hispanics. The A.D.L. and the J.D.L. is out there to remind us of the Holocaust every chance they get. But, if a White Man were to join the Klan he would more than likely lose his job and be a social outcast.

Our White National Holidays are currently being replaced. With the promotion of Pro-Black Holidays and Jewish Holidays, our White Culture is almost forgotten. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Day is now one of the most recognized Holidays by the people of the nation. Malcolm X, a known White Hater and terrorist, has a day set aside for him in the month of June. Kwaanza is now practiced throughout the Nation and dominates the News during its weeklong celebration. Juneteenth is celebrated here in Texas. Why?. The Negroes here in Texas found out that they were freed two years after the fact. So in essence they celebrate their stupidity. Jewish (Satanic) Holidays are taking precedent over Christian Holidays.

Gonzo #racist libertydwells.com

S Jackson has to play the stereotypical "angry black man" in damn near every movie he's payed MILLIONS OF DOLLARS (hear that Liberals, a Rich Black man!) to be in, and then he feels "victimized" when blacks are "stereotyped" as "angry". Typical Hollywired Liberal asshole.

I'm finally to the point where I'm ready to earn what Liberals want to make me.

I'm white, so I'm a racist, and because of that liberal belief, I've become what they said I was. I despise Barak Obama, and Samuel Jackhole, and Jessie Jackass, and Charlie Rump-Wrangler, and Louie Farrykan, and The THANKFULLY ROTTING CORPSE of Michael Jackson, and Al Race Pimp Daddy Sharpton, and all the rest of their darker kindred, FIRST AND FOREMOST, for the color of their skin.

I'm SICK of being called a "Racist" because their skin color is different than mine, therefore, I hate their f**king skin color!

If I could, i would eat white crayons for the rest of my life just so I don't have to have anything brown in my house. I would shit white turds, drink only white milk, eat only white bread, replace all wood in my house with metal or hard plastic, cover my yard with a concrete slab so no dirt shows. Switch from Budweiser to Heineken just so I can have green beer bottles instead of brown!

You want it, Liberal assholes, you got it. I'm the Racist you've always dreamed I would be. I hate you all, f**k off and die, preferably at MY hands you n**ger loving, fag sucking assholes!

White Genocide is Real #racist christiannews.net

White supremacy is a myth, a false tale told by communist globalist Marxist liberal democrats on a mission to genocide white people in the very nation they founded.

White Supremacist = A White man that openly objects to his political dispossession and demographic replacement by the 3rd World Hordes in the nation forged out of a savage wilderness by his White Forefathers

“There are some things that must be said so that future generations will know that at least some of us were aware, and that our generation was not entirely composed of cowards and fools.” - Guillaume Faye

White is much more than skin colour. White refers specifically to the peoples of European Descent just as Blacks refer to those of African descent.

Whites (Europeans) are a distinct Caucasoid phenotype.

Whites are one people... One race with many different tribes people, just like blacks in Africa are of one racial group which make up many different tribes. A swede who marries a pole and has a child is not race mixing and committing racial suicide. When Whites mix their racial bloodlines with Blacks, Asians, Latinos or Indians that is racial suicide.

The reason why Whites in America have been reduced to using the term White Nationalism is because the American identity have been hijacked by ((( Marxists immigrant propaganda))) and non-whites think they can be included in the American Nation. They can't...one is born into a nation by blood. The American ethnicity was forged out of Europeans Stock. How did this happen...because Whites (Europeans) are cousins by blood.

If you're not White (European) you're not an American. A nation is blood. A nation is not an idea.

Genes =DNA=Blood...create culture. If all the races were the same and equal then we would all have the same culture. It's a lie and everyone knows it..we see the lie daily everywhere we look.

Civilizations do not die. They commit suicide and it is what we are witnessing throughout all of White Western civilization. Neither those in power nor the people think enough of their civilization to preserve it.

The masses have been (((brainwashed))) by the progressive canard of multiculturalism that all cultures are equal. If you think your culture isn’t better than another, then you have no reason to care if it is preserved and replaced by another.

Lady Checkmate #fundie disqus.com

Lady Checkmate's headline: "Atheist (homosexual) Lies: "Being Black is as Sinful as Homosexuality."

This a common alt-left lie AND offensive in every way possible. They continue to conflate the two issues. Race is NOT sin, but behavior/homosexuality is sin.

I offer that it is the homosexuals who are the true racists. Consider this, I have NEVER heard a Christian state that being black is a sin; however, homosexuals regularly compare their sin to our skin color. They have essentially equated the two and said our skin color is as much an abomination as their behavior. That is an insult to every person of color in the world and a demonstration of what they think of AA people (our skin color is an abomination to them).

On the contrary, Christian abolitionists (white, black, etc. ) ALWAYS stood against racism and slavery, oft times risking their safety, lives, etc. in the process. Christians obey God and walk out His word.

Scripture DOES NOT support racism. In fact, God punished Miriam for her racism when she spoke against Moses and His black wife and God's word says that to Him there is neither black nor white/slave nor free. God is GOOD. Resist the lies of the alt-left. God loves us and is not for racism. The enemy lies and seeks to spread those lies as truth, in an attempt to draw people away from God. But not so, in Jesus name.

[irrelevant scripture deleted]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ADdr_3DixC4

Don't forget to RECOMMEND. Lets get the Truth out so that Light may shine bright in this dark place and Jesus Christ may be glorified.Even if the discussion is closed, please still RECOMMEND.

Fedorfan500 #fundie mixedmartialarts.com

[on a mechanic refusing to serve gays]

if a good ole boy doesn't want a gay gallivanting around his garage while he puts in his stroker, drops in his pushrod, bolts on a blower or screws your nuts then he has a right to refuse service especially if the truck will be used in a gay wedding.

[He can't say "I don't serve black people here" and it works the same way with gay people. He's a moron]

No that is a protected class and skin color is not like gayness.

[But if it's ok to discriminate then maybe there should be no protected classes?

How can you stand for freedom and tell me it's not ok to discriminate based on religion or skin color?]

No there should be protected class but where you put your junk isn't one of them.

If where you put your junk is a protected class then ALL on the LGBTPQQ should be a protected class from fur players to denim dress wearing polys.

[yes we know. you are pro discrimination.]

No I am pro religious freedom. I am pro constitution.

[no. you're pro discrimination. the constitution has been amended many times. if all you're saying is you'll argee with anything that's currently in the constitution you're even more morally bankrupt than I thought.

200 years ago you'd be appealing to its authority to validate your opinion on why women didn't deserve to vote, and why black people should be slaves.]


Homosexuality is a behavior,not a gender or a skin color.Sexuality is far less innate than skin color. And since sexuality is not protected and religion is, a behavioral code that limits any assumed innate behavior based on deeply held religious conviction would and should trump that behavior on one's premises.

It is wrong to use the government to force a business to do certain things. One of them is to force them to allow certain behavior on their premises or create an expression that violates their free ex.

Now we agree on the existing protected class. I do not agree with sexuality being one.

[So your sexuality is a "behavior?"

How is Religion different from a "behavior?"

If we go by that standard, Religion shouldn't be a protected class either.]

Yes.

Religion is protected. Are you arguing that it shouldn't be a protected class?

[ I'm saying that if your definition of what constitutes a protected class is that anything that can be defined as a "Behavior" and not something you were born with should not qualify, then Religion does not qualify either.

You choose to follow a Religion. You choose to be religious. That's a behavior.

Do you also believe that gay people can be fixed through therapy?]

Yes religion is important enough to to be protected. Your sexual urges are not.

Secret Asshole #fundie kiwifarms.net

I was always ultra-liberal, exploring my religion, never being fully atheist, but exploring others for a time. I looked at paganism and Wicca even, though that was brief when I read some books. (I have to admit this because I find this hilarious, I very very very briefly considered Islam. Just know this was before 9/11 or any real Islamic Terror attacks or rape riots). I always, ALWAYS argued liberal politics with my family, who are staunchly conservative. I argued with conservatives in college, went on debates, the whole nine. Except it wasn't like today, it was amicable arguments. Where it got intense, but you were still friends, you were still family. That's what I thought being a liberal was. Argue your points, but allow for freedom of thought. I even got offended by Muslim jokes, even after 9/11. I was tolerant and shit.

When it really started to erode was the financial crisis of 2008. My family got FUCKED by it. We avoided foreclosure by the skin of our teeth because of massive job losses, but we've never fully recovered. I got caught up in the hope and the dreams of Barack Obama. 'Yeah, Obama! Take care of that corrupt Wall...Healthcare? Wait, why? What are you doing, you can fix the financial system, help the poor and the...oh...you want a legacy...oh.' When he went balls deep into healthcare instead of helping the economy, the cracks started to appear.

Occupy Wallstreet was when I broke. I couldn't do it anymore. 'Stick it to those big bankers! FUCK EM UP...wait, why are there hippie drums here? Disabled people? What are you talking about the police for? Queer politics...the progressive stack? WHAT THE FUCK WHO CARES, THEY ARE DEGENERATE GAMBLERS AND IN A JUST SOCIETY WE'D HANG THEM FROM LAMPOSTS YOU STUPID FAGGOTS WHAT THE FUCKAREYOUDOING.' Which lead to the Colbert show clip and one of the leaders was a rich white cunt called Ketchup. At first, I actually thought it was the FBI doing COINTELPRO. Seriously, that's not a joke. I literally could not believe the people in charge were this fucking stupid to let them go in front of a camera.

Once I realized that they were that stupid and were rich white cunts who latched on to the most important issue of our time to promote their own fringe ideologies (which would become progressivisim) and force out others, I was fucking done. Hugely fucking done. It got even worse when progressives invaded gaming and started screaming. I was still bitter about 2011 so when the country hadn't recovered and they were screaming about meaningless bullshit, I wanted to beat people with pipes.

I went more and more into shitposting on SA and then even SA got fucking worse, which only pissed off...oh, a huge amount of people. I got really bad there, before it became a core of SJWs. Hellthread I was full on shitpost mode, which I found hilarious at how mad I made the libs. At this point, I hated progressives. They represented the worst of liberals, the excesses which didn't focus on the poor or downtrodden, but on people's skin color or genitals or shit that really didn't matter. After they closed Hellthread for good, pretty much all the shitposters left SA, I went to SASS, found it too specific to SA and came here to shitpost harder.

Nothing will turn you from a liberal to whatever I am like true financial strife and it being ignored so a disabled tranny black queer autistic can speak about wheelchair ramps. I relish every time the progressives lose societal influence, I love seeing them angry and not getting their way, I love to see them get fired and all their businesses to fail. They had the chance to fix one of the most corrupt industries in the world and they cared more about the most superficial traits on people instead. They rejected the foundations of liberalism for their own narcissism and virtue signaling. I want Donald Trump for another 4 years so they continue to go insane and lose influence as people see how fucked their priorities are and what hypocrites they are. Fuck progressives. Fuck all of them.

stefanbauwens #fundie deviantart.com

Stamp - Just stop doing it

"Comparing Homosexuality to Skin Colour is Ridiculous"

Skin color is something completely different than a lifestyle.
Above that skin color has nothing negative about it, does not harm your body or anyone else and this is something actually that can be scientifically proven to be born with.

Because you are not born gay. Yes, we are born with sinful desires, but we are not PHYSICALLY born into homosexuality. If you want to debate this then give me ONE believable proof that scientists identified a new born baby as gay, and that child also grew up and identified himself as gay. I'm pretty sure you won't and the reasons why are obvious: it's not possible because being gay is a choice.

HalfAsianBob #fundie reddit.com

Here's a letter to my dead Asian whore of a mother that I wrote, I hope you can read this and see the rage I have

Dear mom, you dirty fucking Asian cunt, white worshipping piece of shit whore,

I'm so very fucking sorry that Asian men weren't good enough for you. Again, I'd like to congratulate you on the fact that you gave me a white face that I could pass through this fucked up racist world, and I'd like to thank you for being so fucking incredibly forwardly thinking that you decided to fuck only white men; now, unfortunately, because of genetics, neither I nor my brother could ever have your coveted blonde hair or blue eyes, but that's alright, because it's good to know that deep down, you resent us because we look whiter than you, and because deep down, you still resent us for reminding you that no matter how much white sperm you took, you could never be white. Neither could I.

Oh, how sorry I am, you whore, you fucking degenerate whore, that you told the world that you hated Asian men, but yet you gave birth to two of us. I'm so fucking sorry that Asian men offended you SO much that you had to give into white supremacy and let the world know that you thought that the white master was king, and that his bastard offspring, both worse and better at the same time, was nothing more but the result of a conquest.

Don't feed me that fucking Asian men are patriarchal BULLSHIT. IT'S JUST FUCKING BULLSHIT AND YOU KNOW IT. White patriarchy is and will always be the be all and end all of patriarchy and you gave into it because it got your ratchet fucking pussy wet. That's all it was, you WHORE. You brought me into this world as a slave, a son of a slave master and a plantation female Uncle Tom; that's what you were. You, and all the other ugly brown whores in my family, tell yourselves over and over that you think Asian men are patriarchal, but all it is is that you like thing white cocks are better, and because you have a pussy and are able to use it to get whatever the fuck you want (thanks female privilege) you could get yourself a nice white man - and lo and behold you did - and this one was a beta Christian idiot who thought that you were God's answer to white women not wanting him. Oh, you played your cards right, didn't you mommy, didn't you.

Look at you. You're dead now. You're buried in the ground and have been for 15 years. My little white head tore you open and you got some bad blood from that, didn't ya? So sorry about that - you could have lived, couldn't you? But once your hormones wore down and you realize the mistake you had made, marrying a broke white guy who loved Jesus more than you - then you decided to end your life, didn't you? Isn't that what you did? You abandoned your two children - your two little half chinks. Now look at us. I can barely work I'm suicidal and depressed; my brother is bedridden and insane, he'll never work another day in his fucking life.

Look at us. LOOK AT US. YOU DID THIS TO US.

ALL YOU ASIAN WOMEN WHORES DID THIS TO US.

And it's not Asian men who are saying this. Asian men are too fucking naive to see what's really going on. But I see what's going on. You fucking sluts eye fuck me on the train every day; to you I'm just another tall white guy. But if you knew that I had won the genetic lottery and didn't come out looking Asian, oh boy, how quickly you would change your mind. I'm saying this. One of your precious "white / mixed race" children is saying this. I'm the patriarch, you fucking sluts. I AM. LOOK AT ME.

YOU MADE ME INTO THIS.

FUCK YOU. FUCK YOU, MOTHER. YOU THINK I HAVE KEPT THIS INSIDE ME FOR SO LONG? YOU THINK YOUR ACTIONS WOULDN'T HAVE REPURCUSSIONS? I'M ON THE BRINK OF SUICIDE EVERY FUCKING DAY FOR FIFTEEN GODDAMN YEARS, YOUR ELDEST SON IS BEDRIDDEN AND MENTALLY ILL AND OH, SHIT, WHAT A GREAT IDEA TO JUST SAY FUCK YOU TO ASIAN MEN, YET YOUR OWN SONS ARE ASIAN MEN?
YOUR OWN FUCKING SONS?

Read this, Asian women, READ THIS. I FUCKING DARE YOU.

I FUCKING DARE YOU TO READ IT.

And before you go off calling me Elliot Rodgers, at least you recognize that Elliot Rodgers was a little half-chink like me; the product of YOU. I am no harm to anyone, just myself. You all deserve this fucking hell on earth. Every single one of you cunts should be forced to live on earth for a million years. And I wish, I wish from the bottom of my fucking heart, that every one of your kids has exactly the same problems as me. Fuck you mom, fuck you and your dyed hair and colored contacts.
Fuck every last ounce of you. It took me a long time to say it but I said it. FUCK. YOU.

Oh yeah, I said it. Go and cry about misogyny, you whores. I'm your chosen one - America's little mixed race darlings, us magical mixed race unicorns that are nothing more than the products of aggressive sexual selection - that's me. And I say fuck you. Fuck you to hell. Burn in every last bit of hell.

Moses David / The Family International #fundie xfamily.org

Cover Image (NSFW!)

I am for the mini-blouse
Or the see-through at my house
She is such a lovely thing!
To her mounts I love to cling!

I'm a mountain' man, my Honey!
Give me mountains for my money!
Though I oft explore her cave
It's on her mountains that I rave!

Let those mountains be more visible
And their clothing more divisible!
Then they would be safer far
If you'd leave those gates ajar!

To reveal her scenic beauty
Is your Godly given duty!
Clear away that underbrush
And their praise you cannot hush!

Down with front retaining walls
Beauty hidden is what galls!
Away deceit--hypocrisy!
Truth unveil for all to see!

Lift men's minds from out the gutter
And her praises they will utter!
Raise their eyes unto her hills
And you'll cure neurotic ills!

T'would increase their hopes to hail
Beauteous heights without the veil!
You can now her valley fathom
Far above her lower chasm!

Clear the undergrowth away
For that smell of new-mown hay!
Undergirding, pillared column--
You can have your clothing solemn!

Flying buttress, deep crevasse,
There is nothing like her ass!
But I'll show you something better
For a real attention-getter!

Set your mind on things above
That deep cavern that you love!
When I show my lovely miss
Which is why I'm writing this.

I prefer the top to bottom:
Brother, she has really got'em!
The bottomless is not amiss,
But topless heights I like to kiss!

Can't have one without the other,
Like a babe without its mother.
'Bove the bottomless abyss
Stand the mountains you can't miss!

It's each peak so fascinating,
Makes my Love so titillating!
If you'd view ecstatic wonder
Tits like hers can make hearts thunder!

Top to bottom I'm no stranger
But I thrill to mountains' danger!
Top to bottom can be seen
Undulating curves between--
Up and down her tiny crater
Heaves and sighs whene'er I mate'er!

Her volcano off explodes
When we love in our abodes!
It's a holy hole indeed
And within I leave my seed.

Topless, midless, anywhere,
But for bottomless I don't care!
Lest we fall too far therein
And those peaks we ne'er unpin!

Twin peaks draped with fleecy cloud
Very thin and not too loud--
Billowy colour, not deep snow
Lest her lovely lines won't show!

Deep soft snow, howe'er you shape,
Will never cause us males to gape!
Natural pinpoints, clever cleft
That is all that we want left!

Unless she is some old crone,
Can't you leave those peaks alone?
Can't we leave those summits bare
Without all that underwear?

If snow is needed, let it fall
Down within her garden Wall!
For this padding I don't care!
I prefer my mountains bare
Not obscured or capped with snow!
For such trappings I don't go!

Let mountains rise o'er foliage too,
With timberline below the dew
To coverings I have objections!
I like to view the real projections!

Must you think it all so rude
To naturally let her protrude?
To fondle her resplendent beauty
Is our precious pressing duty!

If support is sometimes needed,
Let those peaks be unimpeded!
Buffer bulwarks from below
But leave mountain peaks to show!

Weight not down nor hide the top!
All this hiding's gotta stop!
Lofty shoulder, rolling field,
Let those headlands be revealed!

Arms extended full of grace
No more hidden than her face!
If warmth is needed ere betrothed,
Let her peaks be lightly clothed:
Furry creature, woolly flock,
Loosely wrapped about her smock,
Easy drawn aside by hand
Of the shepherd of her land.

When the summer sun doth shine
And in heat her fires refine,
Quickly melts her fallen snow
And cascading it will go
With the warmth of summer love
Baring mountain tops above!

Like the fleecy misty cloud
Just with vapour her enshroud!
Filmy vapours only flow
From above to vales below!

Only bright and shining tresses
Top our mountain maiden's dresses!
Accent all her naked beauty
With less on our nudie cutie!

She's a beauty with them on
Beauty's self when robes are gone!
Don't conceal her points of int'rest!
Nature's course with clothes thou hind'rest!

Flowers nestle in her hair
'Twined in hollows here and there
Circling round the tower above
All proclaim her joy of love!
Craft displays her lovely wares
Only please the one who cares!

Custom or conformity
And artificiality
Clothe her in hypocrisy
Never let her hidden be!

Methinks there'd be far less desire
To ravish her on lust's cruel fire
In man's relentless exploration
If viewed with open admiration
Her pleasing beauty clearly seen
Would satisfy his sexy spleen!

No need to strip what God created
Nor herself be violated
Open view could satisfy
Ardent longings of his eye!

Nudeness thrills her thankful viewers
Only look and be not doers!
Else she might end on the skewers
Of whose strength goes down the sewers!

You don't wonder what's beneath
Heavy snow or wooded wreath,
All is there for all to see
Mountains' magic majesty!

With each lovely rise and fall
Breath of Spring and nature's call!
Wonders of our God's creation
Defy man's imagination!

No need imagine here their form
Stark reality is borne
'Fore the eyes of mortal men
Naught is hidden from their ken!

With more truth and honesty
Viewers could possessors be!
Insatiable curiosity
Lust for new discovery
Need not strip this pretty maid
It's already been displayed!

Only lower parts need hide,
Upper ones seen far and wide!
Need not lust to rend her veil
See her now you could not fail
Need not dream what lies beyond
For all barriers are gone!

Fantasy doth hide and tease
But undress doth only please!
Fascination doth explore
Man insists on seeing more!

But when rid of all false pride
She has little more to hide!
Strip those bare necessities!
Show those nude realities!

Methinks such open revelation
Tempers tantalised temptation
All is now both known and seen
There is nothing in between!

Evil quests for the unknowns
But her beauty she enthrones!
She doth no more her viewers taunt
Beyond her garden wall to vaunt
To trespass on her property
For all is there so plain to see!

They're not piqued to push their way
Thru' foliage dense to see what lay
Beyond the hedge nor o'er the wall
For all lies bare at beck and call!

Why should I climb my neighbour's fence
When he's not barred my view from thence!
For now I have no need to tread
And trespass to his lady's bed
Nor climb her mounds for better look
Whilst all is clear as in a book!

For naught lies now 'twixt me and thine
To gaze upon thy lovely vine
I need but cast a casual glance
And pass her way with naught askance!

I go upon my merry way
I've seen the entire scene today!
With treasured mem'ry homeward bound
To climb upon my own young mound!

No need to prey and to offend,
This openness I recommend!
You need not honour sacrifice
Just let man's open view suffice!

For oftentimes such wall and hedge
But aggravate, I do allege,
And signs that say, "Do not trespass!"
The more provoke to see, alas!

Where if you'd not obstruct the view
I'd be the more obliged to you!
Let's have no hiding hedges now,
Nor warding walls, to this we vow!

'Twere better far for us to share
Our lovely view of pretties bare
Than hide for us alone to see
In selfishness and privacy!

So let them look in fancy free
Upon your female bon beautie!
Instead of tempting to trespass,
Let's have a look at you, fair lass!

For to look we all are prone--
Just let us see and leave alone!
For if all men are just like me
We like to view our wonders free!

We don't want to bother you,
We just want to see the view!
We'll then pass to other scene
Content with what we've only seen.

Methinks 'twere better to unveil
These hidden beauties ere they pale
And let be seen to all enjoy
So that their loveliness may cloy
And let be shared by every eye
To lessen wont to steal and lie
And trespass on some mountain peak
The news of which is bound to leak!

Let's tread our own and not another's
Or we may have too many mothers!
And so we'll gladly share our own
And hope to view our neighbour's zone!

We'll be most happy to display
Our property that others may
Enjoy the view that we can see
Of all her pretties well as we!

Methinks this rule be better far
And in such way the fashion bar
Of crude display of coarse crevasse
By some near unskirted lass!

That tempteth men with low desire
To plumb her depths beneath with spire!
Or else be nigh repulsed with spasm
By sinking sight of stinking chasm!

So lift your eyes unto the hills
And set your thoughts on rocks and rills
And keep your mind on things above
And let your heart be filled with love!

Let's hope for nobler, loftier scene
And lower parts from mankind screen!
Let's have top, midriff revealed
Not bottomless abyss unsealed!

I guess I'll take what I can get!
Enjoy each view, that you can bet!
For there are those who'd plant a kiss
Upon each passing friendly miss
And if you'd show a friendly nipple
they 'd kiss that too without a ripple!

They'd satisfy the bearer too
As each new mountain heaved in view,
And they'd not stop, but ask for more
Until they've made of you a whore
Give you a parting friendly squeeze
Leave you with nothing but a sneeze!

So let the barers thus beware
Of other bold ones that would dare
Imbed the distaff of their pride
In virgin soil beyond the tide!

Some dauntless might desire for more
And daily dream to you explore
To claim some new discovery
And leave it will posterity!

So you watch out, my maiden fair!
For if you choose to beauties bare
Don't let some drag you to their lair
And plant that distaff you know where!

Be on the lookout for each knave
Who'd leave his mark within your cave!
Please save the touching for your own
If you want mounts for him alone!

usachinanukewar #fundie usachinanukewar.wordpress.com

Jesus is immortal white, which means He must be very extremely gorgeous and, of course, yummy and tasty when eating Him, and He is the Creator of mandarin, my real Ancestor and Origin. Oh, baby, right now, I am on the peak, on the climax, on the pinnacle, of love towards Jesus. Now, absolutely, on the ultimate peak, climax and pinnacle. I’m gotta strip Jesus’ clothes off, just shirtless, not completely naked, whenever He hangs out with me in my own mansion He gives to me. I’m gotta be so speechless and joyfully stunned and submerge myself into His ultimate beauty of His immortal white skin plus a little bit sun-tan, a perfect mix, my ultimately favorite skin color, and all immortal, and His big chest and immortal 8-packs. My Sugar Daddy and Darling.

Horus #racist africaspeaks.com

Any black who do not represent the black man + black women = Black Child way of life is commiting suicide. Did you noticed the amount of publicity on television, newspapers etc..,who promote Interracial relationships with europeans?. This is no coincidence, they are trying to alter your genetic by encouraging you to mixe your genes. This is a genocide. Notice that in the word genocide, you have the word gene, so they encourage you to supress your own genes by mixing it with the caucasian gene.

Hunter Wallace #racist occidentaldissent.com

[From "How It Came To This"]

I agree with this.

The progressive liberal belief in absolute equality is daily affronted by the reality of intractable racial differences. It has been over 150 years since the demise of slavery and 50 years since the demise of segregation. Neither abolition or integration has brought about the liberal utopia.

How do progressive liberals explain this chasm between reality and their ideals and expectations? They do what all liberals do. They explain it through a combination of hysteria, denial and conspiracy theories. Even if there are no actual racists oppressing black people, they are being oppressed by the mysterious forces of “systemic racism” and “institutional racism.” White people benefit from the invisible knapsack of “white privilege.” As the evil oppressors of blacks, the only way to bring about true equality and to establish a just society is to treat White people differently than black people. White people have to be punished for their unwitting sins and the sins of their ancestors. This is “social justice” or “racial justice.”

In such a way, the twisted logic of progressive liberalism leads back to racial hierarchy, inequality and actual racism. Oddly enough, it leads to both intolerance and bigotry and the loss of liberty and equality for Whites who are returned to the feudal state, bowing and kneeling and prostrating themselves before their racial superiors who are endowed with the divine quality of blackness.

From a non-liberal perspective, it is utterly alien:

[Picture of protests and graffitis

What shall we call this?

Disappointed liberalism? Despair liberalism?

Incel Wiki #sexist incels.wiki

Alpha, Beta, Omega

There are three types of males: Alpha, Beta, and Omega. Alpha males are at the top of the social hierarchy, and Omegas are at the bottom. The majority of men are Beta males. 'Alpha' does not mean inherently, or even morally 'superior' it just means at the top of the social hierarchy, which may be corrupt, or too stratified.

Alpha males

Alpha males have dominating personalities. The alpha male is the kind of man whom everyone listens to when he speaks. Alpha males are typically very good looking. Around 10% of all men are alpha males. The average alpha male has had dozens of lays by the time he is 20.

It can be used to describe a wide range of men, some who would be well respected anywhere, and others who would be considered losers in most spheres, but are sexually successful with women.

When the term "alpha male" is used in the dating sense it usually means a man who is sexually successful regardless of other factors, though this usage is disputed.[1] It is possible for an alpha male to be sleazy, manipulative, aggressive, or abusive.
Traits associated with alpha males

These traits describe qualities that alpha males possess. A man can still be an alpha male without having all of these traits. Some alpha males have mostly positive traits, while others have mostly negative traits.

Positive traits

• Charming
• Good-looking
• Powerful
• Respected
• Monied
• Outgoing
• Sociable

Negative traits

• Sleazy
• Aggressive
• Manipulative
• Abusive
• Intolerant
• Bullying

Examples

• Fortune 500 CEO who marries a model
• Rockstar with groupies
• Almost any popular athlete
• Pretty boy who knows how to wrap women around his finger
• Poor guy with seductive skill who effectively has women be his provider

Beta males

Beta males are followers; they are subservient to alphas. They often pick up alpha social skills from their alpha friends, so they sometimes may appear alpha to female bystanders. For this reason, beta males do sometimes get laid. Around 85% of all men are beta males. The average beta male has had 5 lays by the time he is 20.

Omega males

Omega males are both inept leaders and inept followers. They often have little to no social circle. Omega males often suffer from Asperger's Syndrome. Around 5% of males are omega. Most omegas are still virgins by the time they are 20.

Criticism

Some have alleged that the Alpha/Beta/Omega hierarchy is illegitimate in that it bases sexual success upon behavior instead of looks. Looks theorists suggest using the Slayer/Incel hierarchy instead.

Lady Checkmate #fundie disqus.com

Lady Checkmate:
It's time to stop drawing false equivalencies. Behavior is sin, skin color is not. Such statements are very demeaning and offensive to people of color.

Please resist the lies of satan when they are presented to you.

image

Scotty:
My comment is that God equates skin color with sin. Look at Africa.

Lady Checkmate:
Scotty, we're a Christian forum. Please comment on topic. The topic is in the OP: "Behavior is sin, being a certain race is not a sin". Do not try to threadjack off topic, start a sub topic, race bait, make the discussion about one race-vs-another race, etc.

*Please see our community guidelines before commenting or posting here again...the link is in our channel's description (top right hand corner of your screen). We're a Christian community and all are welcome to participate here as long as they comply with our community guidelines. Do not send me any off topic comments, nor questions nor concerns about my request here. If you have follow-up/clarifying questions or concerns please post them in the proper forum, not here, again, the link is in the guidelines.

Consider this a warning.

Thanks.

Note: After this warning, Lady Checkmate banned Scotty and then posted the following:

Lady Checkmate:
Rebooting this as I've noticed several agenda-trolls still pushing that lie. Behavior is a choice...skin color is not.

Mychal Massie #racist wnd.com

Many blacks felt they were owed special dispensation because of slavery and Jim Crow, and whites on both sides of the aisle agreed with them. Even though Democrats fought against it, Lyndon Johnson, owing to the indefatigable efforts of Republican Everett Dirksen and his fellow Senate Republicans, signed the Civil Rights Act of 1964. And it was President Nixon who ushered in race-based affirmative action. Blacks were given special entrance to universities and colleges based on skin color and quotas. This was later concealed under the cloak of diversity, but, in reality, it was still skin color and quotas. Employers were forced under penalty of law to have the correct color-coded balance in the workplace. And that extended to management positions. Standards were lowered to ensure those blacks who were not qualified would be employed and promoted.

Penitence has been made for slavery and Jim Crow. But, not unlike the retail customer who refuses to be satisfied, I believe there comes a time when we must give those who refuse to be satisfied the option of going elsewhere. Yes, I’m saying what you think I am saying. If, despite, America’s best efforts, blacks argue they are not treated fairly, that they are not given the same opportunity to succeed that whites are, if bad decisions that result in bad outcomes are the fault of white society, why stay here?

If blacks are so mistreated, if the realities of life that beset people of every description are more onerous because of white people here in America, why stay?

According to Sails, it is an act of disdain for blacks that leads to a white Santa Claus and a white Jesus. According to people like Sails, white people are happy that blacks aren’t living long enough to “grow old.” Jeremiah Wright uses God’s name in vain as he condemns America. Louis Farrakhan, Wright and even Obama have stated that America brought terrorism on herself because of her mistreatment of peoples of color. There’s Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, the New Black Panther Party and the media, who are the pre-eminent expositors of the unfair treatment of blacks. There’s no way to get around it. Literally not a day goes by that blacks in America do not complain that they are mistreated and denied because of the color of their skin.

If that is truly the case, why do they stay here? Why not leave and go where they will be happy? Why not leave and go to a country where “true” opportunity exists? A place where they are taken care of and provided for better than they are in America?

It’s a conundrum to me as to why a group of people – who supposedly are as mistreated and persecuted as blacks are in America – would want to stay here. Let them leave, and let them take liberals, socialists and the Obamas with them. Because it’s obvious that America cannot satisfy any of them.

Let them go to Liberia. Maybe they can do more with it than Marcus Garvey was able to. But by all means, let them leave here, so that We the People who love America and what she represents can live in harmony enjoying the traditions that made her the envy of the world.

But alas, they won’t do that. They’ll stay here and spread immiseration and complaint because, in truth, they understand there is no other nation that will work as hard as America has to accommodate their malcontent.

Avery Foley #fundie answersingenesis.org

Bill Nye Agrees: “There’s No Such Thing as Race”

In a recent interview on Comedy Central’s The Nightly Show, host Larry Wilmore asked TV’s popular Bill Nye “The Science Guy” the question, “Does racism exist in the animal kingdom?” In Nye’s reply he made this statement, “We’re all the same . . . from a scientific standpoint there’s no such thing as race.” Bill Nye’s answer showed how much evolutionists have changed their position when it comes to the idea of different human races. Actually, this part of Nye’s answer is much more a biblical than an evolutionary view of humanity.

Changing Evolutionary Views

Bill Nye’s statement that “We’re all the same . . . from a scientific standpoint there’s no such thing as race” has been confirmed many times by observational science. For example, when researchers completed the incredible feat of mapping the human genome in 2000, they declared that, based on genetics, “there is only one race—the human race.”1 But this conclusion is not what was predicted in an evolutionary worldview.

DARWIN’S IDEAS ABOUT HUMAN EVOLUTION WERE INHERENTLY RACIST.

Darwin’s ideas about human evolution were inherently racist. He held that different groups of humans evolved at different times so some were closer to their ape-like ancestors than others. The late Stephen Jay Gould, an evolutionist, stated, “Biological arguments for racism may have been common before 1859, but they increased by orders of magnitude following the acceptance of evolutionary theory.”2

Evolutionary ideas about race led to all kinds of horrors such as members of pygmy tribes being put in zoos beside apes,3 injustices toward groups like the Australian aborigines,4 and atrocities like Hitler’s attempted extermination of groups like the Jews, Poles, Slavs, and Gypsies. Each of these horrors—and many more—stemmed directly from Darwinian ideas about evolution. So, according to evolutionary predictions, we should expect to see many different races of humans, each at different levels of evolutionary development. Darwin even predicted that the “Caucasian” should have exterminated all other races. This is a failed prediction by the “high priest” of evolution.

Evolutionary ideas about race have largely changed, however, as a result of Christian challenges. As Bill Nye’s statement shows, observational science did not confirm the idea that there were many different races, but instead confirmed the biblical prediction of one race. The shade of our skin does not reflect evolutionary progress but is primarily the result of our genetic makeup that determines how much of a brown-colored pigment called melanin that our skin produces. More melanin produces a dark brown, “blackish” shade, and less melanin produces a lighter brown, “whitish” shade. There is no such thing as different races! This observation from science goes completely against what evolutionists of the past predicted, so evolutionists today were forced to change their ideas to align with the biblical view.

Unchanging Word of God

GOD’S WORD HAS ALWAYS TAUGHT THAT THERE IS ONLY ONE RACE—THE HUMAN RACE.

Now, if instead of starting with man’s fallible ideas about the past, secular scientists had turned to God’s Word and started their thinking with the infallible Word of God, they would not have made these erroneous conclusions that later needed to be corrected by observational science. God’s Word has always taught that there is only one race—the human race. We did not evolve but were specially and uniquely created in God’s image from the very beginning (Genesis 1:26–27). God did not create different races, but “He has made from one blood every nation of men to dwell on all the face of the earth” (Acts 17:26). Every single human being is a descendant of the first couple, Adam and Eve (Genesis 1:27, 3:20), so we are all related. According to God’s Word, there are not different biological races, there is only one. God’s unchanging Word had it right all along and man’s changing ideas about the past had to catch up with it.

The Tower of Babel

During his interview with Larry Wilmore, Bill Nye said, “So everybody’s from East Africa . . . You migrate into Mesopotamia . . . You have to have lighter skin. It’s this balance between Vitamin D production in your skin and the breaking down of . . . folic acid. Then you migrate across Eurasia . . . Then there’s an ice age. All the snow’s frozen up in the mountains so you can walk to . . . [Alaska]. And then you come down the west coast. [Racism] started because you have these tribes and they have different skin colors as a result of ultraviolet light.” Now, while there are several evolutionary assumptions in Bill Nye’s statements (such as the idea that humanity began in East Africa) and we would certainly not agree with the timeline that Bill Nye holds to for these events, his statements actually sound similar to something a creationist might say!

According to God’s Word, all of humanity is descended from Adam and Eve. This first couple rebelled against God and introduced sin, death, and suffering into creation. Their descendants became increasingly wicked until “every intent of the thoughts of [their] heart was only evil continually” (Genesis 6:5), so God sent a global Flood to judge their wickedness. Only eight people, the righteous Noah and his family, were saved through the Flood. After the Flood, God commanded Noah and his family, “Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth” (Genesis 9:1). But instead of filling the earth, like they had been commanded to, Noah’s descendants gathered together and built a city and a tower (in Mesopotamia, no less). So God confused their languages, thus forcing them to spread out over the earth (Genesis 11:1–9).

Shortly after the Flood and the Tower of Babel, much of the world was engulfed in the Ice Age that was part of the aftermath of the Flood. This would have exposed land bridges, such as the Bering Strait between modern-day Russia and Alaska. As people migrated from Babel, some of the groups walked across this land bridge into the Americas or came by boat where they eventually spread out from North America to South America.

THE TOWER OF BABEL EXPLAINS WHY WE ARE SO DIFFERENT.

The Tower of Babel explains why we are so different. The different people groups did not begin as humanity migrated from East Africa. They began after God confused the languages and groups began to migrate from Babel on the Plain of Shinar in the Middle East. This also divided up the family group and split the gene pool, including various skin shades. Depending on where these groups lived and populated, the resultant genes were left to their descendants.

Because these groups were reproductively isolated due to the language barrier as well as later geographical barriers, different features, like skin shade or eye shape, were associated with different groups. Babel explains our differences! Different people groups are not the result of evolution. They are the result of the division of languages at the time of the Tower of Babel.

(...)

Eventually, the same forces that supposedly produced humans should cause humans to evolve into something new, different, and more fit for the environment. So for Bill Nye to say that “All you’re going to get’s a human. You’re not going to get some new thing” is completely inconsistent with his amoeba-to-astronaut evolutionary worldview, but it is completely consistent with both God’s Word and observational science. According to God’s Word, each organism—including humans—reproduces according to its kind. So we should not expect to see humans producing anything but humans. And this is exactly what the evidence confirms: humans produce humans.

God’s Word Has Been Teaching One Race All Along
Observational science did not confirm evolutionary religious ideas about the past. So evolutionists simply changed evolutionary ideas to match the new data. But what they should have done is realized that the observational evidence confirms what God’s Word has been teaching all along. If they had started with God’s Word, they would have had the right foundation for their thinking and would not have reached such erroneous conclusions. It is God’s infallible Word—not man’s changing and fallible ideas—that is true and is confirmed by the observational evidence.

Anonymous Coward #conspiracy godlikeproductions.com

Why Mexico is desperate to keep the illegals in America:

Mexico is desperate to keep the illegals in America, because effectively in Mexico, there is a racial caste system based upon skin color.

Mexico has spent the better part of 20 years, radicalizing the dark skinned Mexican's, to get them to illegally move to America. Accusing White American's of racism, for the most trivial of things, while in Mexico, in order to get a job, you have to attach a photo to your resume(to keep the darkies out).

Look at the former Mexican president, and even the current one: They look nothing like the millions of illegal immigrants from Mexico.

Heck, "Carlos Slim", is Lebanese/Semitic origin.

If the illegals are sent back, it means an end to the Mexican caste system. The light skinned Mexican oligarchy, is DESPERATE, to keep that from happening.

We need to expose this angle, and demand an end to Mexico's racist, ethnic caste system. We need to radicalize the dark Mexican's, against the light Mexican's. Remind them how wealthy Mexico is, and how the light skinned Mexican's are actually hoarding all the wealth, not paying their fair share of taxes, and deliberately discriminating against Mexican's that are too dark or Mestizos looking.

It can readily be done. We need to encourage protests at the Mexican embassy's, akin to the protests at the South African embassies in the late 80's, early 90's, to end Apartheid.

The dark skinned Mexican's, must be radicalized. We are at war, with Mexico's light skinned, roman catholic, upper class. We tried peace, but they aim to kill us.

Othmar #racist stormfront.org

Since you asked for politeness, I won't make any comments about your typically female attention-whoring. Let's begin with point A :

Race is not only skin color. Race consists of all inherited (expressed or recessive) characteristics that are commonly found in a given human (or animal) subgroup and are therefore distinctive. A common lie of anti-racist propagandists consists in reducing race to skin color so as to make it appear as something superficial and unessential; but actually, there are considerable race differences in intelligence and character (due to gene differences between races) which are reflected in human history and in the daily life of multiracial societies. That's why we are racist.

Intelligence lies mainly in genes and to a small extent in environment. Genes, including intelligence genes, are not randomly distributed, and that's why there are race differences in intelligence.

According to the evolution theory, we've once had the same skin color (even though there is a controversy regarding the exact timing of the separation of homo sapiens races, some believe that they evolved from already separated homo erectus races and some believe that we all came out of Africa as homo sapiens). But anyway; according to the same theory, a long time ago, our ancestors were not even humans, they were animals. Should this mean that we should not care whether a living being is an animal or a human? Should we advocate equality between humans and animals, and even legalize consensual human-animal sex? It just doesn't make sense.

Evolution doesn't take place through "parenting" (there is no such thing as a hereditary memory) but through :

- natural selection (the weakest die, those with a specific characteristic which make them better adapted to their environment survive).
- sexual selection (those who mate transmit their characteristics to their offspring, those who don't mate do not).

Nowadays, natural selection in humans is weakening due to technological progress but sexual selection still takes place (in the wrong direction, as stupid people tend to have more children).

Because there is no such thing as inherited moral standards (notwithstanding the fact that morality is subjective and volatile), even though people from different races do TEND to behave and think differently (with exceptions on the margin).

Groups based on inheritance are relevant because when you build a house, you want to give it to your children, to those who share your blood and not to some aliens sharing your "moral standards" or even your "intelligence".

This is due to biological imperatives (living beings seek to perpetuate themselves), hence the fact that our racism is based on inheritance-based groups (for example : White people) rather than strictly characteristic-based groups (for example : all intelligent people). Otherwise, our racism would be purely idealistic, without a grasp on reality. But if we seized the power, we would try to develop positive characteristics such as intelligence in White people through an eugenics agenda.

To make people more intelligent, there is nothing better than deporting non-Whites, since they are far less intelligent than Whites on average. The next step is eugenics among whites themselves.

As a matter of fact, one of the main vectors of epidemias is immigration (as we can see with the current ebola epidemia in West Africa)...

Null #racist kiwifarms.net

You all laugh at the idea, you scoff at your own tribe and loudly object to any idea of global anti-white sentiment by saying that "skin color doesn't matter" and "so what if we're all brown"

You'll be alive for 50 more years, and unfortunately for you, you are going to be a minority in your own country.

"Who cares? It's just skin color. White people aren't special."

Even if you don't think being white is anything special or unique, and you cast aside how the epicenters of culture and human development in this world mostly seem to congregate around the West, do consider that it's not particularly important. Even if we were all completely congruent to one another, except for skin color. Even if you don't believe your 'tribe' exists, they do, and if you don't believe it, the people you are calling harmless do believe it, and do have tribes, and you're not fucking a part of them. The most racist people on the planet aren't white.

And what happens when you become a minority in your own country and no longer have control? Not "race replacement" genocide, actual genocide.

https://archive.is/7SBQw

You and your family will be tortured. You'll call the police, but the police has since undergone reforms due to widespread protest and fears of racism. Now the police hate you.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i21HcugW_kI


We didn't have Apartheid. Segregation was 65 years ago. Jim Crow was 100 years ago. Slavery was 150 years ago. The wounds should have fucking healed by now. I was a part of the generation who voted for the first black president. I grew up in the 2000s were there was no racial tension that I could feel, where Carlos Mencia and Dave Chapelle were the #1 and #2 comedians on cable network, and they still hate us. You grow up as a white kid in a black school and they fucking hate you. When I was in school with only a handful of black and muslim students, I never saw them bullied or teased.

Once that tide turns it doesn't turn back. They fucking hate you.

My advice: buy bitcoin, move to Asia. The Asians are racist but a half-white half-asian kid will do pretty well over there compared to a white child in the U.S. after it gets black'd.

Ivan Prga #fundie killscreen.com

The USA is a Constiutional Republic, not a Democratic one. Keep crying with all your lies communists!

Disgusts me that you write that the increase of militias in America has to do with having a black president when his skin color has absolutely nothing to do with it... Maybe do a little more research next time buddy.

Taura Coel #conspiracy ufobriefcase.net

How plentiful patent private of Aliens and human looking hybrids are out there? Offer is theoretical to be all but 57 patent private. Clear of these 57 private are very constant in apperance. For example, acquaint with are theoretical to be plentiful patent types of grey aliens. Zeta reticuli greys, Bellatrax greys, Orion Greys, From top to bottom Greys, Brown/Orange Greys are a few alien grey private recognizable to exist. Clear run also class aliens analogous the Asari, Krogans, Salarians, Turians, Elcors, Hanar, Drell, Quarians and Vorcha aliens. But these aliens are linked larger than to visual display unit about to inscription as a consequence having they say that been seen by abductees. I aspiration I'm branded flawed..If you grasp seen one of these aliens in real life? Let me make out.

This is by no means a utter list of Extraordinary and Hybrid private, but larger than of an perception taking part in the possibilitys of what's out acquaint with in the universe, and in the vicinity of on Dig out. In the field of are several pictures of the patent types of aliens and human hybrids.

Bellatrax Pet Grey Extraordinary
Bellatrax Grey
Andromedans
Draconian Reptilian
Draconian Reptilians
Orion Grey Extraordinary
Small is recognizable about this alien private
The From top to bottom Whites
Varginha Extraordinary
Amphibian
Possible Pet Extraordinary Hybrid
Brown/Orange Grey Extraordinary
Brown/Orange Grey Extraordinary
Tawny Grey Extraordinary
Tawny Grey Extraordinary
Tawny Grey Extraordinary
Mantis Extraordinary
Pleiadians
Pleiadians are designed to be our associates
Brilliant Arcturian Extraordinary
Reptilian
Reptilian
From top to bottom Grey Extraordinary
Zeta Reticuli Grey Extraordinary
Zeta Reticuli
Zeta Reticuli

handy1 #racist moonbattery.com

[A poster states that President Obama doesn't hate white people.]

You are a parrot, self loathing white person hoping to be accepted. It won't happen. Obama does hate white folk, when he looks in the mirror he doesn't see a half white person, when he speaks with Michelle they discuss how cool it is that black folk are finally going to get pay back. As for the mostly white folk in the cabinet: they are just like you pathetic self loathing white people who buy into the idea that they are deficient by being born white.

Skin color should make absolutely no difference to anyone. Unfortunately liberals can't see past it. American exceptionalism to libs is being different; homosexual, goth, black, latino, et al.

This against real exceptionalism which is freedom and liberty for all, equal justice and opportunity. Such things do exist but are fading fast under Obamunisim.

various commenters #racist reddit.com

Re: 'To All The Boys I've Loved Before' Has Creepy Racial Things Going On | Plan A Magazine

(MyBad64)
This movie is an excellent reminder of the lingering pseudo-, false-, 1980’s style liberal take on AF representation of what it’s supposed to be like for an Asian-American (Canadian) teen. Movies like this were made to frame the narrative of WMs were the natural partner for AFs back then (a tsunami of them,with nothing showing the opposite or any different couplings). People haven’t discussed the normalization of this in Disney, Nickelodeon and other kids channels which also exclusively pair young Asian girls with white boys with no Asian boy in sight (except maybe Ravi an Indian-American boy, there are no East Asian-American looking boy). Solid work of imprinting and propaganda work to frame Asian boys and girls psyche on their future place in the American gendered racial caste system.

(Kenzo89)
This is a great article. This story seems to literally be the dream world of white worshipping AF who want a world with only white men and only Asian women. She even made the father white so there’s literally no Asian men.

(FourzeKITA)
Excellent, well-written piece. The actress doesn't do the movie any service (not that it is worthy of any) by saying she and the author demands more male Asian romantic leads in American films, yet have none to show in this one. As was said in the article, the movie is portraying whiteness as peak masculinity, whereas the minority races are seen as nonexistent or feminine. I can't imagine how much these genuine issues will be ignored and deemed as "overreaction" by the general audience, some of whom are of our own race.

(Dean_Friedman)
Wow, that was very well-written. He hit the nail right on the head by labeling it “racial neo-liberalism”. That’s exactly what it is. Putting aside the author’s own self-hate, there’s an obvious reason why this film is so marketable- it’s “progressive” in the most bare-minimum way, to be palatable to a wider, racially ignorant audience. They’re just trying to make a quick buck off the backs of minorities, while erasing the real experiences of Asians/hapas in a Eurocentric society. It’s written like a white person’s fantasy of what it’s like to be a half Asian woman.

Also, lmao at the mom dying from slipping on the kitchen floor. Wtf?

(eddyjqt5)
the neo liberalism is too real.... they'll tell you that being progressive means seeing past our skin colour and putting our color blind goggles on. Basically: promote post racial individualism under the guise of true equality, when in reality its just gentrification, white flight, cultural appropriation, and assimilation. So asians eventually don't even identify as asians. Honestly, neo-liberalism kind of props up white supremacy in an indirect way...

(Dean_Friedman)
Exactly. Neoliberalism= “we’ll only tolerate the profitable aspects of your culture”.

The only way you can make it to the top is if you work in the interests of white supremacy. Why do you think AA “acceptance” has a female face? Because Asian women have been sexually commodified.

(Handsome_Golden_Boy)
Jenny Han is a fucking racial fetishizing creep. Period. Seriously she comes off extremely off and creepy.

Let's disagree with her ideas, no need to personally attack her.

Remember, she grew up in the 80s in Virginia, and she's the product of that environment.

Doesn’t matter. She’s still doing severe damage to the Asian community and she’s being backed and supported by white supremacy. Sure there’s a reason why she is the way she is, but would you forgive the Joker because he used to be a good man who fell into a vat of toxic chemicals? Besides, her actions are creepy and fetishistic, nothing he said was wrong. Just look at how she creepily fetishizes her hapa nephews, comparing them to white actors.

(aleastory)
I can already see all the news articles about some Asian girl getting killed by her white boyfriend/husband/uncle/brother-in-law/family friend/father. All thanks to people like Jen the Hun *thumbs up*

Gee, what "positive" representation that is /s.

anincelforlifelol #fundie reddit.com

I've seen dontcomplain1 and I want to kill myself

He told me he's an incel. I saw how he looks, and his picture was posted on here. He fucking looks like a male model. Oh my god I can't fucking breathe. THIS is an incel? Of course he said he went out ALONE...reminder A LONER to a fucking state park, and made a shit ton of friends in one day. Are you fucking kidding me? He got their numbers, and all that crap. Try that uglies. I'm a big car guy, and I went out alone to a fucking car meet, and made a total of ZERO FRIENDS in one day. Not one person exchanged numbers with me. Male or female. You want to know why? Because I am ugly. I am a subhuman. He looks better than me. He has better eye area, eye color, skin, hair, lips, cheekbones, jaw, chin. Pretty much everything. Fuck this fucking bullshit fucking life. Fuck this existence. I am fucking genetic garbage. It's so fucking over.

LOOKS MEAN EVERYTHING. I CAN'T FUCKING TAKE THIS. I CAN'T FUCKING BREATHE.

Linda Harvey #fundie wnd.com

Why are conservatives back-peddling on slam-dunk issues like freedom of religion? Because we are being challenged on a core question we refuse to directly address.

And here it is: What about homosexual behavior? Good, evil, or neutral?

The answer is that homosexuality is always wrong. Objective reasoning shows us that skin color is unchangeable and that racial discrimination is unjust. We can in the same way objectively reason that same-sex “marriage” is indefensible because homosexual conduct itself is disordered for human beings.

Didn’t Lawrence v Texas settle some of this? Not for those who still use truth as a benchmark.

We aren’t fighting to protect marriage because the term and tradition are important. Let’s be honest that the only reason for this dispute is because people want to engage in anatomically challenged behavior that is observably unnatural, medically risky, improper as an example for children, and changeable.

And it’s a behavior God calls sin. There is no other biblical description of homosexuality except always and only a big taboo.

The constructed identity of being “gay” is harmful and should not be considered a worthy defense in light of reality. The evidence clearly points to the truth that everyone is intrinsically a heterosexual.

We need to have the guts to stand up and say so. Our defense should not be because we Christians just hope to somehow preserve narrow rights over here in our holy huddle.

It is not inequality to reject homosexuality, because no creature is made to engage in these relations, and if they find they want to, it’s their problem and it’s a disorder. We must all bear with each other as we humans struggle against iniquity, but it’s a grave sin in itself to call evil good and to enable a fellow human to walk rebelliously away from God. It is a sin worthy of drowning, Jesus told us, to teach sin to children as we are doing in many schools now by our endorsement of “LGBT” behaviors, as well as in the newly depraved Boy Scouts. God help us.

Guzman (aka Supersport) #fundie rantsnraves.org

[What exactly do genes do, then? What function do they serve? You could start with a consideration of the ~130 genes known to play a role in color. (Any why mutations in those genes alter color.)]


well I'm not going to play like I know all the functions of genes, but what I do know is they are not the end-all be-all of biology. The organism is not defined or controlled by its DNA...instead, the DNA is defined and controlled by the organism. Genes are followers in evolutionary change, not leaders. Genomes resist genetic change and generally only do so as a last resort.

Triarious100 #fundie reddit.com

Our own government is using our tax money to advocate for the genocide of it's own people. Obviously the Liberals and the redditors here will ask, "But whats wrong with white people going extinct, white is only a skin color?" The problem here is that Africans, Arabs, the Chinese etc. do not share our history and as such they have no incentive to protect, preserve, and teach the history of European 'Western Civilization', as we see here.
Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe when Canada has a population of 100,000,000 and the largest religion in this country is Islam, and the most popular language in Canada is Cantonese we will look back at the people that created this country as us rather than them, but that is a huge risk to take. We've already seen this happen. For example, we have already seen the push for curriculum that reflect the diversity of schools, which means no more white male authors in 2100 for example. Canadian History Class will begin with the advent of multiculturalism in Canada, with other units on 'The Migrant Crisis' and 'Western Imperialism'. The Seven Years war in Canada? No longer relevant in the slightest.
What about the cultural products of Western Civilization? Is the Miserere going to be sung by Muslims? Can anyone find any recordings of the Lux æterna done by an Islamic choir? What about the Pietà; will African immigrants to Canada in 2040 consider it their cultural legacy? These are real worries that are not rooted in 'supremacy'. We have already seen what has happened to the uniquely British elements of our culture in Canada, can someone assure me that our culture as a whole is safe?

vew573 #fundie answerbag.com

There is also much taking of liberties with the truth in the name of science, especially by evolutionists. Sweeping, groundless assertions are stated as facts regarding man’s origin and ascent or descent from the lower animals. A scientist who with righteous indignation comes to grips with this matter of taking liberties with the truth is Ivar Lissner, Ph.D., whose books have been published in fourteen languages. In his latest book, published in 1961, and entitled “But God Was There,” he speaks of “the ineffable stupidity of all attempts to reconstruct Neanderthal or even Peking man. Exaggeratedly hirsute [hairy] plaster figures of bestial mien glower savagely at us in museums all over the world, their features usually chocolate-brown in color, their hair wild and unkempt, their jaws prognathous [sticking forward] and their foreheads receding—and this despite the fact that we have absolutely no idea what color Paleolithic man’s skin was or how his hair grew and virtually no idea of his physiognomy” or facial features. “The American authority T. D. Stewart rightly pointed out in 1948 the impossibility of reconstructing hair, eyes, nose, lips or facial expression. ‘The probabilities are that the expression of early man was not less benign than our own,’ he wrote.

“When a museum displays models of Peking man, Neanderthal man and modern Homo sapiens [man] side by side, it encourages a conception of physical and intellectual development which is not in accord with the views of contemporary science. Those who make such models tend to give their imagination free rein. . . . The exhibition of these half-human, half animal figures is symptomatic of the moral arrogance of our era and latently inspired by a smug feeling of ‘look how far we’ve come!’” In his book scientist Lissner shows that man at all times was far removed from the lower creation and at all times had some form of religion. In one of his closing chapters he therefore asks, “Why do we cling so stubbornly to outmoded theories? Why do we prefer to look for our origins in the animal rather than in God?” Obviously because they do not want to recognize the debt of gratitude they owe the Creator nor their need to be in subjection to him. They refuse to admit the truth that “Jehovah is God. It is he that made us, and not we ourselves.”—Ps. 100:3.

hegotgame3 #racist freeratio.org

Actually black absorb more sun rays hence why solar panel are black. White actually reflects lights hence why you need sun cream when you go on the beach. How many black guys you know need sun cream? And also if you look at physical treats they dominate most of the sports which require physical strength (not like golf). The real reason why White ppls show up out of no ware (they will never tell you this in school neither mainstream science..) But its because white ppls extra-terrestial envaders (which is why there skin isn't use to the solar rays of earth sun) hence why you have all these empires which they built (watch the movie 10 000bc) but they had a war sometime 20 000 years ago and lust most of there tech...etc im not gonna get deep into but for those that are interested look up Michael Tsarion. Asians, Arabs, all the in-between colors are results of the mixing of both genes... and later with actual evolution some did develop smaller eyes..etc


Ever wonder why Hitler spoke of the pure blood Aryan race with Blonde Hair and Blue Eyes, with no Dark features? They added the Jew factor to confuse the masses... But if you research well and watch the symbolism that they used alot of symbols which are used by the British royal family and other ancient cult...

wardaddy #racist freerepublic.com

[From a thread on the coming "civil war 2," which is Freerepublic crypto-racist for "race war." This whole thread is excellent.]

Ain’t never been much melting

A bunch of Europeans from similar cultures who looked sort of alike blended together to a fair degree

The other groups not so much

Only groups mixing much across racial lines are at the bottom as a rule and it doesn’t involve marriage

Exception....white boys....oriental chicks...some are fine too

natsumihanaki20 #fundie natsumihanaki20.deviantart.com

1# Homosexuality is inborn


There's no proof that homosexuality is inborn. All of the studies often used to prove that homosexuality is inborn are fallacious. Why? Well, let’s begin with LeVay’s brain study. When looking at the methodology of the LeVay study, one of the key problems is that the study has never been reproduced. Another problem is that out of nineteen homosexual subjects used in the study, all had died of complications of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). AIDS has been shown to decrease testosterone levels, so it should be expected that those who suffered from that condition would have smaller INAH. Furthermore, in a scientific environment where controls and standards are a necessity, LeVay did not possess a complete medical history of the individuals included in his study. He therefore was forced to assume the sexual orientation of the non-AIDS victims as being heterosexual, when some may not have been. Also, there’s brain plasticity which is a fact acknowledged by most scientists. Given that we know today that the brain exhibits plasticity, one must ask if the act of living a homosexual lifestyle itself might be responsible for the difference LeVay noted? Another study often used by gay activists as a proof that homosexuals are ‘born’ that way is Bailey and Pillard’s Study. In this one there isn’t much to explain as the whole fallacy of the study can be proven with this one statement: If there was in fact a “gay gene” or “a gay combination per se” then all of the identical twins should have reported a homosexual orientation. This observation suggests that there is no genetic component but rather social component in homosexuality. In fact, more adoptive brothers shared homosexuality than non-twin biological brothers. If there was a genetic factor in homosexuality, this result would be counter to the expected trend. The other fallacious study we will be covering here is Dr. Alan Sanders’ study of x-male chromosome. Dr. Alan Sander’s study fails for this one reason: the results exhibited on the gay men were never compared to that of heterosexual males. Another thing as to why homosexuality cannot be inborn from an evolutionary standpoint is that: Being gay is a disadvantage as if gay people where everywhere this race would not produce offspring. Besides, there's no proof that homosexuality is caused by hormonal misbalances such as low testosterone, such claims are naught but mere hypothesis and thus, invalid. In fact, low testosterone has been associated with low sex drive and infertility so, there really isn't any ground for such hypothesis. So even if it did exist at one point it would be dissolved within a few generations. Things will evolve or die, since we are still here chances are it evolved away if it even existed. As you can see there's no study that even suggests that homosexuality is inborn.

2# Homosexuality is not harmful, it is just fine

Nowadays, there’s this myth that homosexuality is not harmful and an equal to heterosexual relationships; however, this couldn’t be further away from the truth. Homosexuality is a very harmful practice that results in many illnesses, it’s kind of like smoking a misbehavior that feels good but destroys your body. How can this be true? How can homosexuality be harmful when so many LGBT are such wonderful people? Well, let’s begin with how gays have shortened lifespan. Yes, homosexuals have shortens lifespan and this isn’t just my word as there are studies to back my claims. It isn't just the 1997 study that pointed to this grim truth, according to the article you attached, the 1997 study is fallacious because the lifespan of gays should have improved over time thus, so it shouldn’t be valid today. However, other recent studies have reported similar findings. Such studies include an study done by Paul Cameron and Kirk Cameron of the Family Research Institute and who held a poster session and presented the study at March, 2007 Eastern Psychological Association convention in Philadelphia. The facts of the Cameron's studies were these: the lifespan of homosexuals is 20 years lower than that of straights. They found that in the Canadian database, a decline in homosexuality was evident by the fourth decade of life. Those who identified themselves as homosexual constituted a relatively stable fraction of adults only for those aged into their mid-40s (e.g., one of every 47-48 adults). Thereafter, their proportion dropped regularly, down to one of every 234 adults in old age (65+), resulting in an overall estimate of 1.4% of adults who ‘were. In both the table and abstract done by the Cameron a precipitous decline in the homosexual population following middle age was noted. Taking a look at the statistics and studies regarding homosexuals, both old and new, it becomes evident what’s the real reason as to the reduction in homosexuals’ lifespan. Unlike what most pro-gay activist like to claims this reduced lifespans is not due to discrimination or stigmatization because these studies were conducted in countries were homosexuals are not persecuted, there's very little disapproval of homosexuality, and were homosexuals even enjoy special rights. The reason for this statistics is the nature of homosexual sex itself is harmful, and many of the harmful acts committed in such relationships are not committed by straights as often as by homosexuals. Like Diggs said the anus is not made for penetration and anal sex is extremely harmful for both homosexuals and straights. However, straights have the option to indulge in traditional sexual intercourse which is way safer than those homosexual practices. There's no such thing as safe homosexual sex for all the practices involved in their so called making 'love' ritual have been proven to be dangerous practices that often result in many illnesses. The use of a condom reduces the chances of HIV; however, it does not eliminate the risk especially during anal sex practiced mostly by homosexuals as 1 in 27 condoms will break during anogenital homosexual sex. Also, there’s no scientific evidence that condoms prevent the transmission of Gonorrhea, Chlamydia, and Herpes simplex virus. The prevention of the these three STDs has not been absolutely quantified, because no one is suggesting that a person known to have one of these treatable infections have regular intercourse with an unaffected partner. Though, health professionals assume the usage of condoms reduces the risks of getting these diseases; however, as to what extent condoms prevent these diseases are unknown. Back to anal sex, this kind of sex is extremely dangerous and harmful. The use of artificial lubricants doesn’t make this practice any safer, in one study involving nearly 900 men and women in Baltimore and Los Angeles, the researchers found that those who used lubricants were three times more likely to have rectal sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Even after controlling for gender, HIV status, city, condom use, and number of sex partners in the past month, the association between lubricant use before receptive rectal intercourse and rectal STIs remained strong. Another study that subjected popular over-the-counter and mail-order lubricants to rigorous laboratory tests discovered that many of the products were toxic to cells and rectal tissue. Thus, lubricants don’t really make anal sex safer if anything it makes anal sex more dangerous. Anal sexual intercourse as Mr.Diggs noted does increase fecal incontinence as shown in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2009–2010) done by Alayne D Markland and others which included 2,100 male participants. Anal sex is also known to increase anal cancer and it’s no surprise taking into account anal sex is done mostly by homosexuals that, gay and bisexual men are 17 times more likely to develop anal cancer than heterosexual men. Other physical problems associated with anal sex are: hemorrhoids, anal fissures, anorectal trauma, retained foreign bodies. Oral sex practiced amongst heterosexuals and homosexuals but particularly among homosexuals is dangerous as well. Fisting is far more dangerous than anal intercourse; results of fisting can include infections, inflammation and enhanced susceptibility to STDs. Rimming a practice done by most homosexuals which increases the risk for Hepatitis A or B, gonorrhea, syphilis, and herpes/genital warts, though low, the risks are still there especially when most people perform unprotected oral sex. Another illness that is very prevalent among homosexual communities is Shigella, it can be transmitted through person-to-person contact, oral-anal sex, or sucking or licking of the anus (anilingus or "rimming"), may be especially risky.Many shigellosis outbreaks among MSM have been reported in the United States, Australia, Canada, Japan, and Europe since 1999. Frottage, when done naked or simply if the infected skin of a partaker rubs against the uninfected skin of the partner, can result in STDs transmitted by skin-to-skin contact which include: Herpes, HPV, genital warts, mononucleosis, Molluscum Contagiosum, and syphilis. Also, another risk of frottage is clothing rubbing on a lesion as it can irritate it risking either a secondary infection or a disease spreading through self-inoculation. Tribadism includes the risks of frottage as well. There is almost no published research addressing the question of whether fingering is transmits STDs or not. However, common sense says it should be extremely low but still, fingering is not risk free from STDs. The usage of latex condoms does not completely eliminate the risks of STDs during mutual masturbation and other forms of sexual contacts as it is not 100% effective and there’s also the risk of developing latex allergies. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) reported that while men with same-sex attraction make up only 2 percent of the total population, they accounted for 63% of all newly-diagnosed HIV/AIDS cases in 2010. Despite what gay activist would like to believe, HIV among msm seems to be increasing as in 2014, gay and bisexual men accounted for an estimated 83% of HIV diagnoses among males and 67% of all diagnoses (CDC). When into account that gays are about 1.6% or 2.3% (counting bisexuals) of the population, according to a recent survey done by the National Health Statistics Reports (2014), it can be concluded by using basic math that being gay drastically increases your chances of getting many illnesses. In 2014, gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men accounted for 82.9% of all male syphilis cases and 61.2% of all syphilis cases in the US. In your article it was claimed that over time Homosexual’s ailments would become less common but it seems the opposite is happening as the Center for Disease Control and Prevention(2014) noted that the number of cases of Chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis is increasing among men and particularly the msm populace. A study done by Damien Stark(2007) resulted in indicating that MSM were more likely to have multiple parasites in their stool compared to non-MSM (43.5% versus 8%; P < 0.001). In a sexual health survey of MSM in Vancouver, 18% of men had been diagnosed with genital warts, 62% were infected with a strain of HPV, and screening for anal cancer detected abnormalities in 64% of HIV-positive men and 34% of HIV-negative men (suggesting anal cancer may be present). What’s more, it seems most homosexuals infected with HIV are unaware of their infection! A CDC study found that in 2008 one in five (19%) MSM in 21 major US cities were infected with HIV, and nearly half (44%) were unaware of their infection. Another study conducted by Marc Martí-Pastor,Patricia García de Olalla, and others (2015) concluded that an increase in cases of STIs was observed in 2015, most of which affected mainly msm. The Marc and Patricia’s study revealed that 66.8 % of the HIV cases were men who had sex with men (MSM), 45.5 % of the gonorrhea cases were MSM.74.2 % of the syphilis cases were MSM and 95.3 % of the LGV cases are MSM. Homosexuality increases the risk to HPV as shown by the statistics presented in the journal Cancer (2004): 60% of gay men without HIV, 90% of gay men with, have human papilloma virus infection in their anal canal. A study conducted n 2002 by Susanne L. Dibble and others concluded that lesbians are at a higher risk of developing ovarian cancer. HPV (human papillomavirus) is common in WSW as HPV can be transmitted through skin to skin contact. A study published by the Gay and Lesbian Association concluded that lesbians have higher rates of breast cancer. The lesbians that chose not to do the screenings do them for the same reasons straights chose not to. Since oral-genital sex is a frequent practice of women who have sex with women, genital herpes transmission with both HSV-1 and HSV-2 can occur. A National survey from 2001-2006, reported that 30% of women who reported having same-sex sexual contact in the past year, had positive blood tests for HSV-2. This finding is contrasted with women who report no same-sex sexual contact, among whom 24% had positive blood tests for HSV-2. Other diseases abundant in homosexuals include: Hepatites A, Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C, Proctitis, HSV, BV, HEP B, Giardia lamblia, Amebiasis, and mental disorders. The tendency of gay men to acquire many of these plethora of diseases, contrary to what most gay activists suggest, isn’t due to discrimination as public acceptance of gay/lesbian relations as morally acceptable grew slowly but steadily from 38% in 2002 to 56% in 2011 and is now holding at the majority level; the problems with the American LGBT community aren’t also due to lack of knowledge about ‘safe’ homosexual sex practices as since 2013 in The Real Education For Healthy Youth Act, an act that promotes homsosexual sex education by providing federal fund solely to programs that educate about ‘safe’ homosexual sex partners, has been in place. Also, there have been numerous LGBT education programs receiving federal funding before and many school districts teaching about safe homosexual sex education that date back prior the 2013. On the web there’s also a plethora of websites that cover safe gay sex available to homosexuals of any age, when you write the word ‘safe gay sex’ on Google you will get 36,100,000 results many of which cover on ‘safe’ gay sex practices with tips. So, it can be concluded that the many illnesses present on the homosexual community are more due to the harmful nature of the homosexual lifestyle and homosexuality per se rather than due to discrimination or lack of homosexual sex education. Homosexuality is asexual behavior, not a characteristic like a skin color, and when looking at all this statistics we can determine that homosexuality is a harmful sexual behavior such as smoking is a harmful behavior.

3# Children of gays parents do as well as those of straights

Children raised by homosexual parents don’t fare as well. Studies that indicate that children from homosexual households fare as well as those with heterosexual parents are fallacious. Such studies usually have relied on samples that are small and not representative of the population, and they frequently have been conducted by openly homosexual researchers who have an ideological bias on the question being studied. In addition, these studies usually make comparisons with children raised by divorced or single parents--rather than with children raised by their married, biological mother and father. They have also used selective recruiting instead of using random samples. And usually the reports are given by the parents instead of the kids themselves. Studies that prove kids under the care of same sex parents don’t fare as well as those raised by heterosexual parents include: Regnerus(2012), Allen(2013), and Sullins(2015). Most of these studies have random samples with numbers that are representative of the children raised in same sex households.

4# Homosexuality cannot be changed

there's evidence that shows intervention to change ones' sexualities are actually pretty successful.Robert Spitzer conducted a study on 200 self-selected individuals (143 males, 57 females) in an effort to see if participants could change their sexual orientation from homosexual to heterosexual (2003, 32:403-417). He reported some minimal change from homosexual to heterosexual orientation that lasted at least five years (p. 403). Spitzer observed:

The majority of participants gave reports of change from a predominantly or exclusively homosexual orientation before therapy to a predominantly or exclusively heterosexual orientation in the past year (p. 403).
In summarizing his findings, Spitzer declared: “Thus, there is evidence that change in sexual orientation following some form of reparative therapy does occur in some gay men and lesbians.” He thus concluded: “This study provides evidence that some gay men and lesbians are able to also change the core features of sexual orientation” (p. 415).
Six years earlier, the National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality (NARTH) released the results of a two-year study stating:
Before treatment, 68 percent of the respondents perceived themselves as exclusively or almost entirely homosexual, with another 22 percent stating that they were more homosexual than heterosexual. After treatment, only 13 percent perceived themselves as exclusively or almost entirely homosexual, while 33 percent described themselves as either exclusively or almost entirely heterosexual (see Nicolosi, 2000, 86:1071).

The study also reported:
Although 83 percent of respondents indicated that they entered therapy primarily because of homosexuality, 99 percent of those who participated in the survey said they now believe treatment to change homosexuality can be effective and valuable (p. 1071).

These data are consistent with the ongoing research project of Rob Goetze, who has identified 84 articles or books that contain some relevance to the possibility of sexual orientation change (2004). Of the data reported, 31 of the 84 studies showed a quantitative outcome of individuals able to change sexual orientation. These studies are not mere speculation as they have numbers to back up their results. These studies are more than enough proof that homosexuality can be changed.

#faggots #gay #homosexuality #homosexuals #lesbian #religion #statistics #yaoi #yuri #antigay #boyslove #homophobe #homophobia #lgbt #misconception #myths #science #study #truths #boys_love
Once again God is right and humans are wrong.

Ken Ham #fundie answersingenesis.org

[This is an older article which was recently posted on AiG's Facebook page]

Here’s something you might find hard to accept: In the U.S. culture we are racially programmed, particularly in regard to the skin color issue. Because of our culture’s racist roots, because of the way the world thinks, because of the influence of Darwinian thinking, we have been programmed to look at the exterior rather than the interior of a person, and to make broad judgments based on what we see. Had you not been programmed that way in this culture, you wouldn’t see the differences as you do. Different cultures are programmed in different ways. Our biases and prejudice show themselves in different ways, but in every case it is the world and our sinfulness (rather than science and the Bible) that drives our personal racism.

I realize those are very strong words. You might not even agree with me. But the fact is, it’s true. We just go through our days making all sorts of assumptions and judgment calls based on outward appearances of skin tone, facial features, size, height, etc. It’s very hard to see through the programming because it seems to be such a natural part of the way we think. No one likes to admit it, but the consequences are too serious to ignore. We’ve been programmed, and that programming needs to be changed.

This is no surprise to God, of course. He is fully aware of the pressures and the influences that the world places upon us. But He also states very clearly that it doesn’t have to stay that way. Change can take place in our minds and our hearts:

And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, so that you may prove what the will of God is, that which is good and acceptable and perfect. For through the grace given to me I say to everyone among you not to think more highly of himself than he ought to think. . . . so we, who are many, are one body in Christ, and individually members one of another (Romans 12:2–6).

If you want to solve the issue of racism in your own life, it’s very simple: You’ve got to believe the Bible. That’s the bottom line. You can spend millions of dollars trying to solve racist problems. You can pass new laws and institute all sorts of programs, but unless people believe the history in the Bible—unless our minds are renewed—we will never have the full picture of reality, and we won’t have the foundation that we need to make decisions that line up with truth rather than the lie.

HueHueBr #dunning-kruger incels.co

[Blackpill] Only losers find a losers forum interesting


Chads and stacies can only be interested in other chads and stacies. People with low social value are invisible to them. Our problems mean absolutely nothing to someone at the top of the sexual hierarchy, who does not always coincide with the social hierarchy.

Normies and beckies can only take an interest in the lives of other normies and, eventually, envy the lives of chads and stacies. Incels and other lower-class normies are invisible to them, not least because they are too concerned with their relationships and trying to make their sex lives more interesting.

That way, if you, who are not registered and live spying on this forum, can not be chad, stacy or even a lower category normie. Either you are an incel, assumed or in denial, or you are a normie who can no longer have sex with your partner (which could also be classified as incel).

(ItsOver4cel)
This is obvious. Normal people with an actual social life don't need to lurk for months to make an account in a forum made for lonely virgins.
It is the ultimate blackpill

CertifiedRabbi #fundie reddit.com

Exactly. We're simply looking at the data and coming to logical conclusions based on that data. If race and IQ statistics were some kind of neo-Nazi White Supremacist conspiracy, then why would East Asians score slightly higher than Whites on average? And why would Ashkenazi Jews have the highest average IQ score out of any ethnic group in the world? The Nazis fucking despise Jews with a literal genocidal passion, right?

That East Asians are arrested at much lower rates than Whites in "Amerikkka" also completely debunks the common leftist belief that some kind of White Supremacist conspiracy within our criminal-justice system is holding down non-Whites. If such a White Supremacist conspiracy existed, even if it was based primarily on subconscious bias towards outgroups rather than blatant bigotry, then you'd expect to see East Asians overrepresented in arrest and incarceration rates as well. That that's not happening is very convincing proof that the police are simply doing their job, and that blacks and brown-skinned "Hispanics" (Amerinds/Mestizos) really are genetically more prone to criminality. And when you see that these domestic racial trends largely mirror global racial trends, the genetic racial hierarchy model that race realists and the Alt-Right subscribes to becomes that much more convincing

Mythistory Channel #racist stormfront.org

Here is my massive dilemma with the entire notion of "Racism".

The accusation of being called a racist is worse than being called a paedophile in this warped jewish society. It has gotten so bad that whites will actively defend all other races except their own for fear of being accused of racism.

I have seen cases of white families adopting black kids out of this fear, I have seen weak parents support their children in marrying blacks, turning their back on countless centuries that made up their pure blood line only to destroy it out of fear for a society that hates their white skin no matter what they do.

The way in which racism is used today is almost purely against white society. Although racism does exist in other races, it is no where near as severe as it is against whites.

The message I get from every hollywood movie and just about every single media outlet is that we should allow non-whites into our societies based on the fact that we are all equal and that we need diversity.

Now lets get realistic, whites are the most diverse race on this planet, our features include:

Blonde hair
Brunette hair
Black hair
Fair hair
Blue eyes
Brown eyes
Green eyes
Grey eyes

All the other races on this planet have little to no variation amongst their own. They all have black hair and brown eyes.

So now that we have destroyed the ridiculous diversity idiocy lets move on to the reasons on race mixing.

The jewish promoters of race mixing tell us yet again that we are all equal (even though jews refer to themselves as The Chosen). Communism (a jewish invention) promotes the notion of egalitarianism which is the incorrect theory that we are all exactly the same and therefore mixing between us is good because egalitarianists/communists believe race does not exist.

If race doesn't exist then why are there obvious physical/psychological differences between each other? why has the negro never invented an alphabet or even the wheel? why could the Europeans split the atom and why are they able to enter space with their technology while blacks enslave themselves and believe that raping infants cures themselves of AIDS? please for the love of god, help me find the part where we are equal!

Now as I said before, race mixing is being encouraged by the jewish controlled media, they accuse the non-mixers of being racist. The jew's definition of the word racist is basically anyone against them or against the savagery of 3rd worlders and their totally foreign customs being forcefully integrated onto the Europeans' civilization at the behest of the jewish oligarchs. They say we are racist for not mixing but it is mixing itself that will destroy all races.

Say for example a white and a negro mix, they have just both destroyed their racial uniqueness, destroyed it so utterly that their blood line will NEVER recover. The real racists are the ones pushing racial mixing on us as they will destroy all our racial uniqueness and this applies to every race not just the whites.

Can some one please explain to me how mixing of the races is some how positive for anyone? I would definitely love to hear a Liberals' view on this... I also suspect they will chant empty slogans like "Diversity is our Strength" or "The only race is the human race", and this will confirm their level of irreparable brain washing.

So please, explain to us evil White Nationalists the fruits of a raceless world.

Fionn Westron #racist dailystormer.name

The implications of the baby not having any similarity and looking like a stranger, is starkly clear.
It is not a hate or cruelty to remark upon this, because it is a fact. It is a physical and psychological truth, and because it is a truth that dismantles the ‘multi-cult’, it is therefore a weapon – truth usually is, to philosophies of darkness. This weapon of truth is merely one observational comment, exchanged as a pleasantry in conversation. It’s power highlights how their “baby” looks nothing like them. No colour blue, grey, green eyes, no variety of brown, blondes, red hair, or the finer variety of white bones structures, and greater and finer varieties of long straight smooth and fine hair (whites also have black and brown eyes, as well as hazel). One will always wonder if they do not resemble them physically, what other ways are they different. No ability to see herself/himself, Granny or Grandad, or to see the more ancient ancestors in photos trotted out by the BBC program exploring the ancestors of Jews, who like to take pride in such. When they see other mother’s or father’s adoringly telling of the phsycial similarities between them, their grandparents and even greater grandparents, they will not be able to join in, but will sit silently and realise a massive part of parentage. Of course there is no subsitute for simple care and real love, which is independent of blood bonds, but ancestral racial bonds are one issue to consider, and they are a natural consequence of simply being with one’s own people, a natural and lovely component that is easily had when one partners with one’s own kin.
If you see a white mother, with a race-mixed child, especially of African input, there is practically no resemblance to the white person, there may be a tiny, miniscule structural resemblance, but by no means every time. From the cases I have seen, this occurs in only a small minority. We say there is no need sometimes to always tell people the truth, and sometimes this is true, it is sometimes the better thing and depends on the situation. But in this case, truth is doing these people a favour and more importantly it is crucial because it is messages like these that help our race. It helps our people value and thus defend themselves, it helps whites see themselves as worthy and as the people most desireable, that in itself would have helped all those girls who were savagely groomed and raped by Muslim gangs and many single mothers of mixed-race children. Of course white men are also guilty of their own degeneracy, but it is prevalent among African males.
This is why such day to day interactions are important, over the long term they all add up to have a wider impact. Although it must be said how modern society and male lad-mag culture has a hand in pushing women into the arms of waiting charmers to use as anchor wombs. Again that is another issue for another day.
Instead, the smug and image-conscious, or low self-esteem parents or single mother is now faced for the first time in their multicult indoctrinated lives that their jewel, may as well be someone else’s child. Or may as well be another part of the increasingly common non-white majority mass which globally is 90-92% while we are the rare and precious physically more diverse 8-10%. Our race has been proven to be the most balanced race in terms of attributes, in terms of IQ, emotional intelligence, stability, humour, imagination, physical prowess, martial skill and strategic intellect, there is nothing in any field we cannot excel in. I have a sneaking suspicion the fields where other races excel, are those where we have vacated, in the numbers which would allow our kind to outcompete the best of other races, who populate those said fields now, in greater numbers. And ironically out of all the races, she has opted to opt out of the one thing the multicults laud and applaud her for, the very reason she opted for a mixed-race child: for the approval of society, for the gushing comments of how cute her baby is, for the resounding back slapping that she lives up to her “green-peace” commitments by backing it up with having an earth child…..she opts out of having a child from the race who are the most compassionate race on the planet, so much so, that we have allowed that strength become our weakness, and it may end up killing us and humanity, ironic and tragic.
Above all I find it a very sad thing to behold, and while such a comment must be made, it is hard to do and hard for them to receive. I have more sympathy for the overweight council estate mother who perhaps was shunned or made fun of all her life by smart-arse white males, helping to push some white women to look and seek validation elsewhere and was duped by the snake-words of an Arab or African who know what the score is and how vulnerable or susceptible these women or girls are. I reserve such comments for the more capable and multicult-self-aware, smug-class, usually out and about parading their brown jewel when doing their shopping at the local organic markets. I have nothing but contempt for these image-conscious pious-parading smuggites. And after, I am left with the heavy feelings of care and compassion, one of the hallmarks of our race, towards my race and a sadness as I contemplate the possible fate that awaits us…..
……this feeling leaves and is replaced by another hallmark of our race, a righteous rage and fury, galvanised by a fierce determination!

Lady Checkmate #fundie disqus.com

(Commenting on story "Todd Starnes: A win for Masterpiece Cakeshop (Christians), but it ain’t over yet"):

When the alt-left is losing it's anti-christ campaign to promote sin and make it illegal to reject their sin, (out of desperation and hoping someone, anyone, is still open to their manipulation and lies), they try to co-opt the African-American experience (particularly slavery) attempting to draw parallels between their sins and the terrible abuse AA slaves suffered at the hands of VERY evil men and women (parallels that DO NOT exist btw) to garner sympathy for their sin in some sort of weird by proxy exchange of experience and sympathy. Note, the manipulators are usually NOT descendants of slaves nor even AA, but have the audacity to attempt to pimp the AA experience to further their own wicked agenda. It's VERY disrespectful. They overlook the fact that the two have NOTHING in common - behavior is sin, skin color is not sin. They essentially equate their sin to the color of AA's skin...smh. Also, notice that they only do that to AA, not Jewish people (May peace be in Israel. God bless Israel), Japanese people (prayers for them) nor any other people who have suffered such crimes against humanity. VERY DISRESPECTFUL.

Lincoln County Public Health Administrator #moonbat #racist newswars.com

Lincoln County’s directive, which went into effect June 16, appears similar to other mask orders across the country, stating:

General directive: All individuals in Lincoln County are required to wear face coverings during any indoor public setting or outdoor public location where a person will be in within six feet of another individual, who does not share the same household.

Where Lincoln County breaks from other places is it’s made an exception from the mask order for “people of color.”

“The following individuals do not need to comply with this Directive,” the order issued by Lincoln County’s Public Health Administrator states, before going on to exempt “People of color who have heightened concerns about racial profiling and harassment due to wearing face coverings in public.”

The county did not offer an explanation, or go into detail about what kind of “racial profiling,” or “harassment” a person of color might experience due to a face mask.

It’s also unclear why “people of color” would be excluded from mask ordinances when CDC data supposedly shows minorities are being disproportionately infected with COVID-19.

W. F. Price #sexist web.archive.org

["Historical" note: this post is the closest you can get to an origin story for The Spearhead]

Now that gender equality in terms of income has been achieved in the younger generation, and educationally women currently surpass men, most of us ordinary men find ourselves staring irrelevance straight in the face. A friend of mine recently observed that women are “taking over” his department at his former company. Except in specialized occupations that require male minds or bodies, women do indeed appear to have the upper hand. However, I observed to my friend that the top remains largely male, while the middle is dominated by females. The bottom, like the top, is predominately male. Unfortunately for us men, there’s a lot more space at the bottom than at the top.

So what does that mean for men who are not among the fortunate few? Are we destined to be lowly peons shoveling muck out of gutters? For many of us, our fate could be worse than that. Gutter cleaning pays fairly well, at least according to the last bill I saw for that service. The future certainly does look grim, but could there be anything redeeming about our new status as disposable goods? Yes, there could, but only when we learn to accept and finally embrace it.

Bound by a sense of duty and responsibility to family, employer and country, men demanded certain guarantees in return. All these guarantees can be summed up in one word: fidelity. We expected not to be cheated, lied to or abandoned. Sadly, all these things have come to pass. Perhaps our own complacency is as much to blame for this as anything else, but our betrayal is a fait accompli. There was the inevitable denial, rage, and despair, but finally we find ourselves at the point of acceptance.

Accepting such a great loss of security, confidence and trust is a very difficult thing to do, but it is profoundly liberating. Whereas before one was shackled to deceit and resentment, now the fetters are broken, the cell door opens, and suddenly the world is revealed. Feelings of guilt, inadequacy, anger, envy and disappointment dissipate in the open air; ought gives way to is. When one arrives at this state of mind, all of the countless obligations, worries and responsibilities lose their sting. It becomes clear that reality – the way things are – is our only true master. We owe no debt to anything or anyone else.

So once a man throws off his countless restraints and goes all the way up the chain of command to take orders from the top, how does he deal with his only boss? Perhaps surprisingly, dealing with reality is very simple; it is only a matter of “can” and “cannot.” There is no want, should or ought with reality. All those are subjective, and have nothing to do with the sun setting or things falling when dropped. A man who has a good idea of what he can do has a great deal of choices and ability, because there are infinite things men can do. Of course, there are always consequences. For example, you can jump out of an airplane without a parachute, but you cannot survive it. This is where judgment comes into play. However, although dealing with reality requires good judgment, letting other people do so for you requires absolute faith in their judgment AND their interest in your own welfare. That’s a risky bet.

Once a man is freed from the bondage of others’ expectations and desires, all that he does comes from his own heart. Any help or affection is freely given and not in any way coerced. His love and goodwill are pure and free from any taint of flattery. Likewise, any malicious acts are undertaken only by his own initiative. His heart and intentions are made clear through his actions. Because reality is truth, he embodies honesty.

These principles apply to all people, whether male or female, but the loss of direction among men in our civilization is a fairly recent development, and needs to be addressed. At this point, a politicized “men’s movement” might be counterproductive, because it would lead us down into the sewers of contemporary discourse. But a spiritual awakening, accompanied by a recognition that we have our own priorities, is sorely needed. Women rebelled against their social obligations and limitations and threw them off. Men, too, can do the same.

When men see that bondage is a state of mind – often an unconscious choice – they realize how easy it is to cast it aside. Our own bondage came from the guarantees that we demanded, which slowly created obligations that we came to see as inevitable. But now that the guarantees have been removed, we find that we are still in chains, and herein lies the great liberating opportunity afforded by injustice. Without the shock of betrayal and loss, we might have plodded along forever, devolving into something akin to oxen, fit only for heavy burdens and the whip. But that will not happen now. The deal we’ve got is clearly rotten, and there’s no good reason to haul that load.

The uplifting feeling one gets when laying down a heavy burden does much for the spirit. The bitterness over loss and betrayal is forgotten as the realization sets in that one’s life is in one’s own hands. What others want, think or expect becomes no more important than anything else, because all that matters is what IS and how one chooses to deal with it. When men know that, they know true freedom.

pRoPhEcY #racist abovetopsecret.com

The Blacker the Berry, the Sweeter the Juice

How do we account for blond hair and blue eyes?

A very small minority of people in the world demonstrate this phenotype.

Now there are plenty of other people who exist in very cold climates but do not have blond hair and blue eyes. They are "people of color".

If you are outside on a very hot day, and you are wearing Black clothing, you feel even hotter, because the color Black absorbs energy.

So the idea that skin whiteness is a result of evolutionary biology for the sake of being better able to absorb heat maketh no thenth.

Why do the Africans, in their splendid Blackness, demonstrate such Unequaled Greatness, which you can see upon the walls of the tombs?

Why are the white peoples crawling around in caves and throwing rocks at the moon while the Black Africans are solving the extremely complicated geometric equations in order to build The Great Pyramids?

"Lord of the Perfect Black". Osiris. The Great African God Figure.

Perfect Black Skin.

Now, go outside and let the sun shine on you.

Lady Checkmate #fundie disqus.com

Lady Checkmate's headline: "Attack Against Children: School Survey Asks Sixth Graders About Visiting Gay Bars"

(Story cut-and-pasted from Todd Starnes, link here: https://www.toddstarnes.com/show/school-survey-asks-sixth-graders-visiting-gay-bars/)

Lady Checkmate:
Todd is correct, that survey had NOTHING to do with Black History Month, but was instead about pushing a wicked agenda in an attempt to normalize the abnormal with an end goal of legalizing child rape. It is offensive that anyone (the racist alt-left in this instance) would try to associate sexualizing children with Black History Month and as a Christian AA, I find it disgusting that anyone would attempt to use the AA experience to push an agenda that not ALL of us support. Whoever gave that survey to children should be immediately released from their contract and have their licenses, certifications, etc., revoked. To the racist alt-left lost who assume they can equate the color of our skin with their sin...STOP it. Do NOT equate sin with the color of our skin. Your racism and hate is worse than anything you accuse others of. Being AA is NOT a sin, but behavior that goes against God's word is sin. Seek Jesus Christ.

Mick Williams:
Horror of horrors. . . a Christian lab partner! The poor liberal would be traumatized for life.

Gregory Hood #racist amren.com

MLK Is Post-White America’s Founding Father

It’s a holiday tradition. Conservatives, including civic nationalists such Steve Bannon, praise Martin Luther King. Both leftists and white Identitarians say this is absurd. Both agree King was a dedicated socialist who worked with Communist Party members. King was also an adulterer, a plagiarist, and did nothing to stop a rape he witnessed. The rape incident was disclosed by a progressive reporter and biographer, who called the challenge to King’s stature “fundamental.”

This has had little effect on conservatives. Instead, they redouble their efforts to force Martin Luther King into the American and even the conservative pantheon. Heritage Foundation president Kay James tweeted: “Our founding principles would be the very tools we would eventually use to right our own wrongs. Dr. King helped us to prove we could do just that.”

The Heritage Foundation also published an article at its website, The Daily Signal, claiming that “our principles required that we solve our race problem.” King therefore becomes “our last Founding Father.”

Yet can the race problem be “solved?” Barring genocide (which at least some leftists intend for us), expulsion, or peaceful separation, the race problem can at best be managed. No society has ever “solved” the race problem. That’s why prophets like Enoch Powell warned against unnecessarily importing the problem to begin with.

Even the Daily Signal article implicitly admits this. “The Untied States at large had a race problem that traced back to when the first African slaves were first imported to Virginia in 1619,” wrote Dion Pierre. “It was not ameliorated when Abraham Lincoln’s Union Army dispossessed the Southern aristocracy of its slaves and remained acute in places like Birmingham, where King first established himself as the man that would lead the United States into the multiracial era.” It would have been better to avoid slavery and the “race problem” altogether, as well as the supposed necessity for a “multiracial era.”

Contrasting King with Malcolm X and other black nationalists, Mr. Pierre said that “King understood the temptation to fight identity politics with identity politics, but refused.” Mr. Pierre also claims King preached that “any form of race nationalism defied the ‘edicts of the Almighty God himself.’”

Of course, King explicitly defended racial preferences for blacks, which is the essence of identity politics. Considering his sexual behavior and his denial of Christ’s divinity, he didn’t take the “edicts of the Almighty God” too seriously either.

Mr. Pierre deals with this history by ignoring it. He simply asserts that King believed “character, not skin color, counted most.” Now, thanks to the last Founder, the descendants of slaves and former slave holders can all sing “My country, ‘tis of thee, sweet land of liberty, of thee I sing.”

Maybe Mr. Pierre even believes this. Meanwhile, in the real world, most Americans think race relations are getting worse. A huge black majority says the country hasn’t gone far enough in granting “equal rights.” Fifty percent of blacks say America never will. Desegregation and affirmative action haven’t appeased blacks and leftists. They increasingly blame racism for racial inequality, no matter what programs are introduced, resources redistributed, or statues torn down. No other explanation for racial inequality is possible in a country that refuses to acknowledge racial differences.

Most non-whites think their race or ethnicity is “central” to their identity. Whites don’t, probably because “American” and “white” are still implicitly linked. Thus, polls show whites are more patriotic while non-whites lead protests against historic American symbols like the Betsy Ross flag.

White identity is catching up with “American” identity. In the “multiracial era,” your passport is less important than your race. European-Americans have more in common with our Continental cousins than “fellow citizens” who don’t speak our language, identify with our history, or honor our heroes.

Conservatives awkwardly trying to fit King into the Founders’ mold must ignore what Thomas Jefferson, George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, Alexander Hamilton and others said about race. Instead, they reduce our “founding principles” to “all men are created equal.” This is as stupid as saying King opposed racial identity politics.

Conservatives need King. To admit there is a conflict between King and Washington is to admit the problem can’t be resolved. It denies “American exceptionalism,” which to many whites is akin to denying God. Most whites can’t stomach religious hypocrisy the same way Reverend King and his pastor friends could.

Mr. Pierre is right about King being a “Founder,” though not in the way he thinks. A fraud and hypocrite in almost every aspect of his life, King cloaked his agenda in traditional American rhetoric that appealed to well-meaning, naïve whites. Now, the mask is off. Thanks to demographic change, leftists and non-whites no longer need to pretend. They can admit America was created by whites, that Martin Luther King was “radical” (in Cornel West’s words), and that American institutions must be fundamentally changed to serve the new population. King isn’t the last Founding Father, but the first Founder of the new, post-white United States. If King truly was the “Founder” of a nation, that nation has nothing to do with us.

Whether such a dystopian, dysfunctional polity can long endure is impossible to say. What is certain is that Sam Francis was right: “The logical meaning of the holiday is the ultimate destruction of the American Republic as it has been conceived and defined throughout our history, and until the charter for revolution that it represents is repealed, we can expect only further installations of the destruction and dispossession it promises.” Deliberate refusal to understand is moral failure. Conservatives can no longer plead ignorance.

Tiffany138 #racist teens-4-christ.org

why would God put the barriers of skin color up if they don't matter.. there is a reason for different skin color obviously or we would all be white, or black.. there are certain barriers.. i personally believe what i posted. that certain descendants are allowed to intermarry and certain ones are not.. [...]

janesophie1 #fundie news.aol.com

Laws against interracial marriage were wrong because a man or woman of different ethnic groups can fulfill the unitive and procreative propose of marriage and human sexuality. Homosexuals will never be able to fulfill the biblical purpose of marriage. I am African-American. It is deeply offensive to compare skin color to sexual preference. Stop hijacking the Civil Rights Movement. MLK would be appealed!

IAmWhatYouMadeMe9 #sexist reddit.com

The Sexual Revolution of the 60s was worse than the Holocaust

Sure, in the Holocaust, a lot of people died and it was pretty uncomfortable. But it was over in a couple of years and ever since then J-words have been living with unparalleled special treatment that only women exceed.
The Sexual Revolution was far worse. It undone centuries of social progress. Every achievement we'd made since the 1780s just disappeared. It condemned literally millions upon millions of men throughout the ages to a life of inceldom. It destroyed standards and morals by normalising shit music, drugs and the "club and casual sex" degenerate lifestyle. It was the progenitor of feminism which is and always has been an anti-male/anti-ugly male hate movement.
In short, the Sexual Revolution was our very own Holocaust but we're unlucky enough that it never ends, and we must live in the concentration camp of the degenerate modern day for our whole lives with the knowledge that things will only get worse. Already polyamory is being normalised and considered by sluts to be a valid form of relationship. Serial monogamy (basically the same thing) was normalised a while ago.
We're absolutely fucked, incels. Chad has won. We are hated because we're ugly, and that's the top and bottom of it. Personality means nothing if a slut can go to a club and have sex with a different alpha male every night.

brutus & John Adams #racist vnnforum.com

[On Indians]

brutus:

Of course most of us here realize niggers aren't hated for their skin color, they're hated for their individual and collective niggerish behavior. However the jew is forever able to trot-out that trite canard and the masses will dutifully nod their heads in agreement.
I bring up the idea of the Indians from India as a useful seed to be planted in the minds of racially unconscious Whites that logically refutes the lie that niggers are hated solely for their skin color.
Indians are the polar opposite of niggers in much of their behavior. And IMO much of India's problems we see today can be attributed to the centuries-long subjugation of that country by a jew-controlled England and jew's British shabbos goy.
The Taj Mahal was built before the time of the English and that feat of brilliant engineering and architecture is something to be admired and gives us an insight to an advanced culture far above the lowly nigger.

[...]

John Adams:

Do you actually know anything about India other than the taj which was actually built by the Mughals. The only input by the native curry was as slave labor
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mughal_Empire
As for your statement that the curry is the polar opposite of the nigger in behavior, have you never heard of the child grooming and repeated rapes of whites in England by currys..a paki is just a muslim curry.
Their involvement in money laundering, fraud, drugs and the sex trade and other criminal activities puts them way above niggers in terms of their danger to our race.
You obviously know nothing about India or the pathetic parasitical vermin that live there
Here is a thread from the UK section here covering just ONE problem Whites face with those from the sub continent I suggest you read it before making any further comments about currys
https://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=141709

[...]

brutus:

Re: John Adams

You sound like a Brit. If you are a White Brit I can understand your resentment of Indians, that you refer to as Pakis. It's much the same sentiment racist Americans feel toward niggers, and rightly so.
I have no intrinsic love for any of the brown races. But for those few browns who exhibit some degree of advanced culture, I'll acknowledge that for what it is. England suffers greatly from the jew disease and is probably a generation deeper into the illness than America. The British Empire is dead and the American Empire is on its deathbed. Thanks to the jew. And both the English Paki and the American nigger are but symptoms of the jew disease. While I dislike the symptoms, I reserve my visceral hatred for the cause of the disease, the jew.

the_worst_93 #sexist reddit.com

Men have been lied to so badly by women and society.

Just all these fucking copes man. "Personality matters", women like bad boys because of confidence". All Bullshit lies. Yes, why do bad boys have such high co fidence? Because they have fucking years of social proof that was given to them by their superior genetics! Fucking moronic Norman's. Your average or below average male can not become confident because he doesn't have social proof because he is ugly! Men have been sold a dream, and that dream is confidence will come naturally you just have to work on it. Such bullshit, we have gymcels here who spend years in the gym and they still know they are ugly and they can never get confidence like a chad.

So its simple normans, confidence comes as a result of years of social proof, knowing you're accepted and wanted. Being accepted and wanted is a result of having good genes. Any other explanation for why women love confidence is fucking delusional Bullshit.

Davide Piffer #racist #sexist amren.com

Creativity, Genes, and Racial Differences

Davide Piffer is an Italian evolutionary anthropologist. He received a BA in Anthropology from the University of Bologna and a Master of Science in Evolutionary Anthropology from Durham University in England. His Master’s thesis was on the sexual selection of sleep patterns among humans, and was the first to link mating behavior to chronotype (sleep patterns during a 24-hour period) within an evolutionary framework. His research later shifted to quantitative genetics, and he published one of the first studies of the heritability of creative achievement. In 2013, he switched to molecular genetics, focusing on the polygenic evolution of educational achievement and intelligence, and this remains his main focus. Within this area, his main finding is that ethnic differences in intelligence are largely explained by the thousands of genetic variants that predict cognitive abilities within populations.

Grégoire Canlorbe: As Leonardo da Vinci pointed out in his notebooks, “The black races of Ethiopia are not products of the sun, for if in Scythia a black man makes a child to a black woman, the offspring is black; but if a black man inseminates a white woman, the offspring is gray. Proof that the race of the mother has as much power over the fetus as that of the father.” Besides skin color, how do you sum up what we know — or appear to know — about heritable racial differences in traits such as intelligence, creativity, or even the rate of maturation of male voices?

Davide Piffer: As I said, creativity has been neglected by geneticists and many psychologists, so unfortunately we know next to nothing about race or individual genetic differences in creativity. With regards to intelligence, there is a growing consensus, thanks to the work of myself and colleagues, that racial differences have a genetic basis. This comes from different lines of evidence, using the most recent methods of population genetics: admixture analysis and polygenic scores.

As for voice maturation, Philippe Rusthon proposed the theory that the Mongoloids are the most K-evolved and the Negroids are the least K-evolved, while the Caucasoids fall between the two, although closer to the Mongoloids. This theory is supported by a large amount of data. I made a new contribution to Rushton’s theory by presenting data on race differences in the age at which the voice breaks in boys. The prediction from Rushton’s theory and the hypothesis to be tested is that the voice should break at a younger age in Negroids than in Caucasoids. The hypothesis was successfully corroborated.

Grégoire Canlorbe: Your most conclusive investigations in behavioral genetics deal with the connection between sexual selection and sleep patterns — or that between sexual selection and both sex- and country-level differences in performance on tests of fluid intelligence. Could you tell us more about it?

Davide Piffer: I was the first to investigate the relationship between sleep patterns and sexual behavior among humans as part of my MSc’s dissertation at Durham University. My original work was later replicated by a researcher from Sri Lanka and a group from Germany. Sleep is well known to affect mating behavior in many animal species, and some heritable differences in chronotype also predict mating success among men, both in Western and non-Western societies.

The effect seems to go above and beyond personality (extraversion) and the propensity to engage in social activities at night. Being a night owl is associated with going out at night, thus increasing the chances of meeting a member of the other sex, but also with testosterone levels. We still don’t know if it is also perceived as an attractive feature in males, but it has significant sex differences, with males across different societies being more likely to be night owls than females, so it is a candidate target for sexual selection.

Some years ago, I published a paper in which I proposed an explanation of the paradox that more developed countries, with higher equality of the sexes, had a higher sex inequality in IQ scores. That is, in more developed countries, men are smarter than women, but this sex difference is much smaller or absent in less developed countries. For example, in Muslim countries, women have higher ability than men, so we could call this the Muslim paradox. This is the opposite of what one would expect from a purely environmental perspective, because women get more education in sex-equal countries. What I found was that smarter countries had higher sex differences independent of GDP or equality of the sexes.

A potential mechanism that I did not mention in the paper but that occurred to me later is that in industrialized countries, dysgenic fertility is mainly driven by highly educated females having fewer children and later in life, whereas male intelligence is not generally related to reproductive success. This sex disparity in dysgenic fertility would cause women to decline in intelligence relative to men.

This may not seem obvious. Because both men and women contribute to the genotypes of children, the fact that high-IQ women have few children should depress the IQ of both sexes, not that of women only. The question is more subtle, however, because many complex traits have sex-specific mechanism of expression, so that the same allele has different effects in males and females, even if the genes are not located on the sex chromosomes.

Grégoire Canlorbe: You devised a methodology to detect polygenic selection, a mechanism that acts on many genetic variants simultaneously. You have done this in particular with educational attainment. How do you summarize your approach?

Davide Piffer: My approach moves away from classical methods that focused on a single gene, because most traits are polygenic — the result of contributions of many alleles, or gene variants — and the effect of each is so diluted that you need to study many genetic variants in order to detect a pattern of selection. The frequency of a single allele is mainly affected by genetic drift unless that allele has a very strong effect on a trait such as, for example, sickle-cell anemia. Natural selection also affects population frequencies of alleles, but the effect on a single allele is typically so small that it can go unnoticed. However, when you simultaneously look at hundreds or thousands of alleles, you start seeing a pattern because the effects of random drift on each allele cancel each another out, and what is left is the directional effect of natural selection, which acts more strongly on some populations than on others, according to the environmental conditions or the sexual dynamics across the millennia.

Of course, these alleles are not picked at random from the genome. They come from studies called GWAS (“genome-wide association study”) which explore the correlation between millions of genetic variants or SNPs (single-nucleotide polymorphisms) and some phenotype or trait, such as years of education or height, using very large samples (from 100,000 to over a million individuals). These studies then find the SNPs with the strongest phenotypic effect, that is those that can increase an individual’s IQ by half an IQ point or increase height by as much as a centimeter.

The average frequency of alleles weighted by their effect on the phenotype (e.g. IQ) is called the polygenic score. Polygenic scores can be used to predict how well individuals do in school, or their height, or risk for cardiovascular disease. These scores are based on direct biological evaluation of a subject’s genome, so they are unaffected by culture, family differences, or any other factor that is commonly claimed to invalidate traditional IQ testing. I calculated polygenic scores for populations by averaging the scores of samples from different ethnic groups available on public databases. In the case of educational attainment and intelligence, I used between 2,400 and 3,500 of the most significant SNPs to compute polygenic scores.

What I found was that these population-level polygenic scores had a very high correlation of r=0.9 with scores on standardized intelligence tests. Ashkenazi Jews have the highest polygenic scores, followed by East Asians, then Europeans, South Asians, Native Americans and Blacks. A correlation this high would occur at odds of only one in 46,000 if the SNPs had been chosen at random. Furthermore, the SNPs associated with the greatest intelligence differences between populations were also associated with the greatest differences between individuals within a single population. This supports the view that both kinds of difference were the result of selection.

image

Grégoire Canlorbe: You made the claim that the north-south difference in Italy in fluid intelligence should be understood in terms of genetic differences between the populations. What data corroborate that hypothesis?

Davide Piffer: Historically, literacy levels and economic prosperity have been higher in the north than in the south. Data collected by Richard Lynn have shown that these differences are reflected in scores on tests of intelligence and scholastic aptitude (PISA and INVALSI).

There are strong genetic differences within Italy, recently corroborated by an in-depth study (Raveane at al., 2019). These differences were mostly established in pre-Roman times: Bronze-Age migrations from the Eastern European steppes (Indo-Aryans) in the north and West Asians from the Caucasus in the south. The Latin people who founded ancient Rome belonged to the Indo-European/Aryan group, along with other Italic tribes, such as the Veneti who later founded Venice.

Later migrations strengthened the pre-existing differences. In the first millennium BC, groups of Celtic people (originating from Indo-Aryans, like the native northern Italians such as the Veneti and the Ligurians) settled in the north and mixed with their ethnic cousins (that is why the Roman name for northern Italy was Gallia Cisalpina), and the Greeks heavily colonized the South (Magna Graecia) in the 1st millennium BC. In the Middle Ages, Germanic people invaded Italy and mostly added to the genetic pool of northern Italy (mostly Lombards and Gothic peoples) with some pockets in central and southern Italy (the Lombards in the Ducato di Benevento and the Normans in Palermo), whereas the south was conquered by Arabs.

thoughtsandreplies #fundie thoughtsandreplies.tumblr.com

image

If #BlackLivesMatter, why are we called racist when we point out the major causes of Blacks dying? Like Abortion & Black on Black crime.
If #BlackLivesMatter then why am I denounced for pointing out the black owned businesses, their livelihoods, that are destroyed by riots in the name of criminal thugs whose own choices put them on a path of destruction, and who are venerated as innocent victims only for their skin color.
#BlackLivesMatter? Yes they do, but so does THE TRUTH.
This hashtag movement is all about racial victimhood and shaming the innocent, not telling the truth or solving the problems.
So maybe I should just focus on pointing out the Modern Holocaust and put the Undeniable Statistical FACTS that will automatically get me called racist, on the back burner for a while.
There are just too damn many h8 & race mongers meeting any criticism with a wall of lies.

Ah, really? Then lets point out that the would-be epidemic of cops killing innocent blacks is a complete fabrication and the number one killer of blacks is blacks. [of course the concentration of blacks in inner cities with gun control laws aka a disarmed law abiding populace amidst an armed criminal element, probably has a lot to do with it].
IF YOU CARE ABOUT BLACK LIVES THE MOST [well then you’re by definition a racist but] THEN YOU SHOULD POINT OUT THEIR NUMBER ONE KILLER, oh wait, abortion is greater than the so-called murder rate. INCONVENIENT that.
And most importantly when someone points out the numbers they are not championed as trying to put out the fire, but rather shouted down as racist for derailing a racist anti-police agenda laden hell hound, propagating myths through a persistent ignorance of how the justice system works, and scapegoating.
The term unarmed black teen is purposefully misleading bullshit propaganda. An unarmed teen can assault a cop and go for his gun, get shot dead, being fully responsible for his fate.
White thug did it recently enough, and didn’t make national news. It’s proven a black thug did it and the vast majority of blacks believe the myth of ‘hands up don’t shoot’.
The very premise of the slogan “Black Lives Matter” posits on its face that the person you’re saying to doesn’t think they do. Which just goes to show how heavily racist that movement is.
And to denounce the addendum that “All Lives Matter” is to pretend that one saying it must believe blacks are toasters, or to wish to illicit a superior attention based on skin color alone, ie Racism.
Sadly the solutions to the blights in the ‘black community’ have all been figured out for decades. It’s all just too hard to hear for culture raised on victimhood. And it’s far too easy to drown out the hard truths with comforting lies that lays the blame at the feet of others.

Incel Wiki #sexist wiki.incels.info

Hypergamy

Hypergamy is the inclination for women to "trade up" is terms of looks, money, or status.

Women are always calculating whether the gains from a new relationship will off-set the losses of leaving an old one. Femoids are consistent in analyzing the value of their partners relative to the available pool of men. While hypergamy has always existed, women judge social expectations as a cost when leaving a partner. Modern society makes promiscuity less of a negative, so women are more likely to jump shit when ready.

80/20 Rule

A analysis of online dating reveals than the vast majority of women who rate men only consider about 20% of them to be actually attractive in looks. In the most popular dating app of tinder, people have found out that “the bottom 80% of men are fighting over the bottom 22% of women and the top 78% of women are fighting over the top 20% of men" [1].

Personality Doesn't Override Hypergamy

Obviously, a common normie counterargument would be that women aren’t as visual in real life as in the app, and that you can display a bit of personality when approaching a woman. Other studies, however, stress on the notion called the “halo effect,” in which your perceived personality could be in correlation to how you look. [2] For example men are commonly told to be funny to attract women, but in reality being attractive makes you appear funnier in everything you say [3] and judged less harshly/not seen as creepy in weird situations [4].

Even in real life, you have to surpass a certain looks level for a woman to even desire you intimately. There has to be physical attraction at first for a relationship to be initiated. While women say that personality matters more than looks, their decision indicates that they value looks first [5].

As a result, we can conclude that since females do not regard the vast majority of men to be physically attractive, them being sexually free would result in sexual inequality, since only a few men would be actually desired by women. The other 80% have to make up heavily by status or money.

GINI coefficients

A study which analyzed GINI coefficients in human relationships found that, “single men have a higher Gini coefficient (.536) than single women (.470). Thus, female sexual partners are more unequally distributed among single men than male sexual partners are among single women” [6].

Keep in mind that women commonly underestimate the number of their partners to avoid appearing as sluts (only a view would actually say the truth.) This gives the illusion that sexual inequality might exist among them. The only reason why the GINI coefficient isn’t close to .6 (80/20) among men is because sub8 males are more likely to exaggerate their number of partners to avoid being virgin shamed.

More and More Males Are Becoming Celibate

Here is a graph that shows that male celibacy is rising, while female celibacy is decreasing.

https://mobile.twitter.com/lymanstoneky/status/992105680000749570?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fincels.me%2Fthreads%2Fmore-blackpill-data-share-of-population-sexless-in-the-last-year-by-gender.41257%2F

Since looks are the main factor in leading to sexual attraction, we could make the assumption that females are simply not appreciating the facial appearances of most men and not giving their sexual favors to them frequently.

How women chase Chads

The cock carousel is a phenomenon that is associated with hypergamy. In theory, women would chase as many Chads as possible during their prime years before settling with a betabux.

One particular UCLA study states that, “a great deal of the evidence indicates two overlapping suites of psychological adaptations in women: those for securing long-term, cooperative social partnerships for rearing children and those for pursuing a dual-mating strategy in which women secure a social partner and engage in selective sexual affairs to gain access to good genes for offspring” [7].

Translation: women (programmed to search for the best genes) have tendencies to fuck the Chads first, and once they become completely used up and hit the wall, search for a betabux to attain financial security and actually raise children with.

It’s OVER if you’re not Chad

Normalfaggots love to state that since ugly/average men can get women, the female species isn’t always displaying hypergamous behavior. This is so wrong on many levels, since women at heart always want Chad and will leave anyone for him once they get the chance.

“Women whose mate value increases substantially will become (1) more emotionally dissatisfied with their current partner, (2) more likely to evade a partner's mate guarding efforts, (3) more likely to cultivate backup mates, (4) more likely to initiate new relationships with higher mate value men, and (5) less inclined to stay with their current partners” [8].

Another study showed that women orgasm more frequently when having sex with attractive guys than with non attractive guys [9]. This shows that women are very likely to keep pursuing Chads for maximum sexual pleasure.

Further proof
A study that analyzed changes in the distribution of sex partners from 2002 to 2011-2013 showed that compared to 2002, top 20% of men (in terms of LMS) now had a 25% increase in sexual partners, and the top 5% of men had an outstanding 38% increase in the number of sexual partners. The study commented that “no significant changes were identified among women in the top 20% and top 5%, overall, and among subgroups” [10].

Sources

1 https://medium.com/@worstonlinedater/tinder-experiments-ii-guys-unless-you-are-really-hot-you-are-probably-better-off-not-wasting-your-2ddf370a6e9a

2 https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/92158/TheHaloEffect.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

3 https://www.theguardian.com/science/brain-flapping/2016/may/19/are-funny-people-sexy-or-are-sexy-people-funny

4 https://splinternews.com/homely-men-judged-more-harshly-than-hot-men-instantly-1793848040

5 https://youtube.com/watch?v=iOHdZKDldIg

6 https://contexts.org/blog/who-has-how-many-sexual-partners/

7 http://pillse.bol.ucla.edu/Publications/Pillsworth&Haselton_ARSR.pdf

8 https://labs.la.utexas.edu/buss/files/2013/02/The-Mate-Switching-Hypothesis-FINAL-PUBLISHED-2017.pdf

9 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886915001002

10 https://journals.lww.com/stdjournal/Fulltext/2017/02000/Changes_in_the_Distribution_of_Sex_Partners_in_the.5.aspx

Colonel-Knight-Rider #fundie #racist #homophobia deviantart.com

Umm, yeah, no. No, I do care about those communities. I'm fine with them being represented in cinema. I wouldn't call Lillies of the Field one of my favorite movies of all time otherwise. What I'm not okay with, and what you don't seem to get (or want to accept) is why current 21st century Hollywood is doing that sort of thing: to make themselves appear more "woke" to their target audience and get their money and praise. Modern Hollywood is exploiting racial minorities and LGBT people in America by treating them as popular trends, or moneymakers, or attention-grabbers, or Oscar bait instead of as people. Maybe bigwig Hollywood producers do care about those groups, or maybe they don't—I'm not a mind-reader. But, either way, do you not see how dehumanizing being treated as fashion trends instead of as people is to those groups? The problem is not who gets represented in cinema but how they're being used for other people's personal gain. I feel sorry that people of color and LGBT people are being exploited by those greedy sons of guns at the top who want to look more "woke" but are as greedy as the average Hollywood producer has always been.

Another fundamental problem is that Hollywood’s handling of race relations has deteriorated over time. Consider, for instance, Lillies of the Field or Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner? They handled race relations beautifully by presenting both black people and white people as smart but in different ways (there is, after all, no such thing as one kind of smart), all while showing that we all have the same capacity for good regardless of skin color. Now, in the 21st century, we get movies like the aptly-named Guess Who? and Get Out or TV series like The Neighborhood, which convey messages such as “White people bad, black people good,” or “White people dumb, black people smart.” This is not to say that Hollywood is incapable of going back to how it used to handle race relations—a rare gem like Bob Hearts Abishola, created by the genius who brought us Two and a Half Men and The Big Bang Theory, presents both races as different kinds of intelligent and shatters cultural barriers to show how much we’re all alike even though we have different skin colors, accents, and manners of dress. But still, I’d like to see more of those positive messages from Hollywood.

Daniel K. #fundie #psycho eaglethewings.com

WHEN RESIDENTS OF HELL ARE ALLOWED TO SEE HEAVEN,THEY CAN ONLY SEE UP TO THE EIGHT H LEVEL.HOWEVER IF A PERSON ON EARTH ASCENDED BEYOND THE EIGHTH LEVEL,THE RESIDENTS OF HELL WILL KNOW THAT SO AND SO IS ABOVE THE NINTH LEVEL,BUT WILL NOT BE ABLE TO SEE THE NINTH LEVEL.

DESCRIPTION OF HELL CANNOT BE DONE IN ITS ENTIRETY AS IT WILL TAKE MANY BOOKS TO DESCRIBE,AND IT ALSO IS STILL EVOLVING,BUT I WILL GIVE A BRIEF SUMMARY OF HELL LEVELS.

SOME FORM OF TORTURES ONE WILL FIND IN HELL INCLUDE.

BEING PASSED THROUGH A CHAIN SAW THAT SPLITS YOUR BODY INTO TWO FROM YOUR LEGS TO YOUR HEAD INTO TWO,SUCH THAT YOUR FLESH FALLS APART,AND AFTER THAT THE TWO DIVIDED PARTS JOIN,AND THE JOINING IS ALSO VERY PAINFUL.IT CAN BE COMPARED TO AN ELECTRIC VOLTAGE BEING PASSED THROUGH YOU.

OTHERS PARTS OF HELL YOU WILL SEE PEOPLE CARRYING LARGE WEIGHTS ON THEIR BACKS,LIKE 700 POUND WEIGHT OF ROLLS,PILED ON THEIR BACKS,AND EACH ROLL IS LABELED THE SINS(BURDENS) THAT THEY CARRIED ON EARTH .AND THEY WILL BE WHIPPED BY DEMONS AND TOLD TO KEEP MOVING AND CARRYING THE WEIGHTS,AND WILL NOT BE SUFFERED TO REST OR STOP,BUT MUST KEEP ON CARRYING THEIR BURDENS THROUGHOUT ETERNITY IN HELL.

IN OTHER PARTS OF HELL YOU WILL FIND DEMONS BUSY SKINNING ALIVE RESIDENTS OF HELL,WITH SHARP RAZORS AND WILL KEEP SKINNING THEM,UNTIL THEY ARE DONE SKINNING THEM AND THE SKINS WILL RETURN TO THOSE THAT HAVE BEEN SKINNED ALIVE AND THE SKINNING WILL CONTINUE THROUGHOUT ETERNITY AND THOSE SKINNED WILL SCREAM HYSTERICALLY.

SIXTH LEVEL

HERE THE RESIDENTS ARE SQUEEZED IN VERY SMALL BOXES OF ABOUT 2 FEET CUBED.AND PILED ONE ON TOP OF THE OTHER.AND THE ONE AT THE BOTTOM FEELS THE MOST PRESSURE AS THE OTHERS ARE ON TOP OF THEM.HOWEVER THE BOXES KEEP ROTATING SUCH THAT ,THE BOX AT THE BOTTOM WILL AGAIN GO TO THE TOP,AND THE SECOND LAST BOX NOW OCCUPIES THE BOTTOM.MUCH LIKE A CHAIN OF ROTATING BOXES IN A LINE,WITH THE BOTTOM ONE FEELING THE MOST PRESSURE OF CARRYING ABOUT 100 PEOPLE ABOVE IN BOXES.

IN ADDITION TO THAT, THERE ARE SPIKES ON EITHER SIDE OF THE BOX THAT KEEP PIERCING ACROSS THE BOXES AS THEY MOVE DOWN.THE SPIKE S ARE LIKE AN AUTOMATIC MACHINE THAT IS PRE PROGRAMMED TO KEEP ON CUTTING ACROSS THE BOXES (THOSE INSIDE FOR ETERNITY) so they pierce in and out CONTINUOUSLY INDEFINITELY.

QUESTION:IS THERE A TENTH LEVEL IN HELL?

ANSWER .

THE BOTTOM TIP OF THE NINTH LEVEL IS WHAT IS REFERRED TO AS THE TENTH LEVEL,OR THE SIT OF SATAN.BUT IT IS NOT A COMFORT SEAT THAT YOU WOULD EXPECT,BUT RATHER A SEAT MADE OF SPIKES.AND THE SPIKES ARE BURNING.WHEN YOU HEAR RAPHAEL HAS TAKEN THE DEVIL TO HELL,HE AT TIMES GOES AND CHAINS HIM ON THAT SEAT.

AND THE SPIKES ARE MADE OF ALL SORTS OF SPIKES(SPEARS,KNIVES,HOOKS,MACHETES ETC) 1000 DIFFERENT SHARP SPIKES,AND THE SPIKES ON THE SEAT ARE LONG AND MOVE UP AND DOWN ALWAYS PULLING AND PIERCING HIS FLESH.SO ITS NOT JUST A SEAT FOR HIM TO FEEL COMFORTABLE SEATING DOWN.

AND THE DEVIL HATES THIS SEAT AND MUST BE FORCED TO SIT ON IT.

HELL WAS MADE FOR THE DEVIL AND THERE IS NO COMFORT PLACE FOR HIM IN HELL.

AND THAT IS THE END OF REVELATION OF HELL.

THE LORD HAS GIVEN THIS REVELATION OF HELL AND THE THOUGHTS OF THE HOSTS OF HELL,SO THAT ALL THAT READ THESE REVELATIONS MAY BEWARE AND FEAR GOD AND SERVE GOD ON THE EARTH ,AND AVOID HELL.

Incel Wiki #sexist incels.wiki

Hypergamy

image

Hypergamy is the natural inclination for women to "trade up" in terms of looks, money, and/or status. In a social environment which seeks to free human sexuality from cultural influence, women become more hypergamous than men because they are naturally sexual selectors. Today, sexuality is very liberated, and women are extremely hypergamous, moreso than men, to the point of causing increasingly rampant inceldom among the male population.

Modern women are always calculating whether the gains from a new relationship will off-set the losses of leaving an old one. Femoids are consistent in analyzing the value of their partners relative to the available pool of men. Women judge social expectations as a cost when leaving a partner. Modern society makes promiscuity less of a negative, so women are more likely to jump ship when ready.

In non-human animals, this phenomenon is referred to as Bateman's Principle. Opposition or aversion to hypergamy is sometimes called 666phobia.

80/20 Rule

image
Women rate 80% of men as below the average of all men, source: Okcupid

An internal okcupid study revealed that the vast majority of women only consider about 20% of men to be actually attractive in looks, and irrationally evaluate 80% of men brave enough to show their mug on a public website as below the average of all men.[1] In the most popular dating app Tinder, people have found out that “the bottom 80% of men are fighting over the bottom 22% of women and the top 78% of women are fighting over the top 20% of men".[2] Because women are sexual gatekeepers their preferences decide the dating scene.

Okcupid deleted it's internal studies showing how women view 80% of men as below average etc... after the Alek Minassian attack but many archives exist including the ones cited above.

Personality Doesn't Override Hypergamy

A common normie counterargument to lookist theory would be that women aren’t as visual in real life as on apps, and that you can display a bit of personality when approaching a woman, thus overriding hypergamy. Other studies, however, stress on the notion called the “halo effect,” in which your perceived personality could be in correlation to how you look[3]. For example, men are commonly told to be funny to attract women. In reality, it is not the case that being funny makes you more attractive. Instead, being attractive makes you appear more funny[4] and judged less harshly/not seen as creepy in weird situations[5].

Even in real life, you have to surpass a certain looks level for a woman to even desire you intimately. There has to be physical attraction at first for a relationship to be initiated. While women say that personality matters more than looks, their decision indicates that they value looks first and foremost[6].

As a result, we can conclude that since females do not regard the vast majority of men to be physically attractive, them being sexually free results in sexual inequality, since only a few men would be actually desired by women. The other 80% have to make up heavily with status or money.

GINI coefficients

A study which analyzed GINI coefficients in human relationships found that, “single men have a higher Gini coefficient (.536) than single women (.470). Thus, female sexual partners are more unequally distributed among single men than male sexual partners are among single women”[7]. Famous sexologist Kristin Spitznogle says this is proof that Bateman's Principle now applies to humans.[8] A separate study of Tinder found that Tinder's GINI coefficient between the genders was on scale with the income inequality of third-world countries (see chart below).[9]

More and More Males Are Becoming Celibate

Here is a graph from Lyman Stone of the Insitute for Family Studies that shows that male celibacy is rising much faster than female celibacy.[10]

image

Since looks are the main factor in leading to sexual attraction, we could make the assumption that females are simply not appreciating the facial appearances of most men and not giving their sexual favors to them frequently.

How women chase Chads

The cock carousel is a phenomenon that is associated with hypergamy. In theory, women would chase as many Chads as possible, chasing the 666 rule, during their prime years before settling with a betabux.

image

Dual-mating strategy

One particular UCLA study states that, “a great deal of the evidence indicates two overlapping suites of psychological adaptations in women: those for securing long-term , cooperative social partnerships for rearing children and those for pursuing a dual-mating strategy in which women secure a social partner and engage in selective sexual affairs to gain access to good genes for offspring”[11]. The lack of loyalty with a dual-mating strategy begets the feminine imperative.

Translation: women (programmed to search for the best genes) have tendencies to fuck the Chads first, and once they become completely used up and hit the wall, search for a betabux to attain financial security and actually raise children with.

It’s OVER if you’re not Chad

image

Normalfaggots love to state that since ugly/average men can get women, the female species isn’t always displaying hypergamous behavior. This is so wrong on many levels, since women at heart always want Chad and will leave anyone for him once they get the chance.

“Women whose mate value increases substantially will become (1) more emotionally dissatisfied with their current partner, (2) more likely to evade a partner's mate guarding efforts, (3) more likely to cultivate backup mates, (4) more likely to initiate new relationships with higher mate value men, and (5) less inclined to stay with their current partners”[12].

Another study showed that women orgasm more frequently when having sex with attractive guys than with non attractive guys[13]. This shows that women are very likely to keep pursuing Chads for maximum sexual pleasure.

Further proof

A study that analyzed changes in the distribution of sex partners from 2002 to 2011-2013 showed that compared to 2002, top 20% of men (in terms of LMS) now had a 25% increase in sexual partners, and the top 5% of men had an outstanding 38% increase in the number of sexual partners. The study commented that “no significant changes were identified among women in the top 20% and top 5%, overall, and among subgroups”[14].

sexypony #racist newgrounds.com

Why aren't races classified biologically by subspecies?

I mean, blacks have very dissimilar appearences to whites and Asians or Indians.
You can denote several different physical features in different races other than skin color.

Blacks have dark skin, flat noses, big dicks etc.
Asians have tiny penises, light skin, slanted eyes, you get the picture.

I don't believe it's all cultural, there has to be some genetics involved.

Ethan Huff #wingnut #transphobia #homophobia #conspiracy naturalnews.com

As part of the trendy obsession with going “trans” these days, the LGBTQ Human Rights Campaign (HRC) has launched a “Safer Sex for Trans Bodies” primer that instructs the next generation of youth into the “proper” use of LGBTQ-approved names for trans people’s genitalia.

A “strapless,” the guide explains, is a term used to describe “the genitals of trans women who have not had genital reconstruction (or ‘bottom surgery’), sometimes referred to as a penis.” And a “vagina,” it further explains, isn’t something that a biological woman is born with, but is rather a “word to talk about the genitals of trans women who have had bottom surgery.”

So, what is a vagina now called on a biological woman? According to the primer, the proper terminology is front hole, which the guide explains “may self-lubricate, depending on age and hormones.” And as far as who has a dick, the guide says “people of all genders” may have one, as a dick is a “word to describe external genitals,” which can “come in all shapes and sizes.”

There’s also a section of the guide that offers tips about masturbation, including a section entitled, “SCREWING, SHAGGING OR MATTRESS DANCING,” which explains how this “safe” form of self-pleasure offers trans bodies the opportunity to engage in sex “without barriers.”

For more related news about LGBTQ perversion, be sure to check out Gender.news.

Transgenderism is a mental disorder, not an identity
As you might expect, Twitter was quick to condemn this Orwellian, and quite frankly disgusting, trans manifesto for basically hijacking the English language. One actual female user called out HRC for stealing the word vagina from real women, and giving them front hole instead.

“Wow, so trans women have a vagina, but us biological women have a ‘front hole,'” this user tweeted. “LOL these people are insane,” she added, referring to Amir Sariaslan, the guy from the HRC who first tweeted about his organization’s language guide.

“What in the fresh politically correct dystopian 1984 language control hell is this?” asked another Twitter user about the HRC’s attempted theft of common vernacular to suit a special interest LGBTQ cause that 99 percent of society would prefer not to have to hear about or deal with ever.

“Um, what point is there in downgrading the correct anatomical name for a born female’s genitalia to ‘front hole.’ I can’t even,” commented another disgusted Twitter user in response to the HRC tweet.

“I’m pretty sure we’ve arrived at the Singularity now,” joked another. Enlightenment has been a total black hole.”

Perhaps the most declarative tweet of all was one guy’s chastisement about how the HRC foundation “does not own language, fortunately.” He concluded this tweet by stating simply, “I have two specific words for them,” which you can figure out on your own.”

David Chase Taylor #conspiracy sites.google.com

Disc Shape of Earth
Unbeknownst to most of humanity, the Earth is shaped like a disc, rather flat on the top with a convex lens-like bulge at the bottom. In other words, Earth resembles a typical alien spacecraft which looks like a discus, hence the term “discovery”. Although only conjecture, it’s highly likely that the Greco-Roman philosopher Plato first discovered Earth’s disc or plate-like shape. In short, atop the Earth is Mt. Olympus (i.e., the North Pole) in Greenland, the northernmost point of Earth’s iron core, while Ayers Rock (i.e., the South Pole) is found “Down Under” in Australia, the southernmost point of Earth’s iron core. In geography, this phenomenon is known as antipodes, any place on Earth's surface which is diametrically opposite to it. Two points which are “antipodal” to each other are connected by a straight line running through the center of the Earth, a term likely derived from Earth’s magnetized iron core which draws compasses towards the north. The notion that the Earth is a relatively flat disc-shaped object was also held by the aboriginal cultures of the Americas who believed that the flat Earth was domed by the firmament (i.e., the clouds of Earth’s second moon). The Sumerian sky-god An ruled the "heavens" which were separated from the flat disc of the earth below, inferring that there are indeed two sides to the Earth. Consequently, the Sumerians, which are an alias of the Greco-Romans, also believed that the universe consisted of a flat disk enclosed by a dome.

Greenland Pi
Although only conjecture, it appears that the ratio of the Earth's circumference to its diameter (iron core) is approximately equal to 3.14 (Pi). In other words, the Earth is roughly three times as wide as it is deep, keeping in line with the oblate spheroid theory. Coincidentally, the “p” symbol (i.e., the pi symbol) is used in mathematics to calculate the area of a disc. The Greek “Phi” symbol (i.e., “F”), which is the 16th letter in the Greek alphabet, is coincidentally found on the flag of Greenland. The “p” symbol is also found in the Roman Score (i.e., the Roman alphabet) but does not exist in the English alphabet. However, the “p” symbol is represented in the English alphabet by the letter "P" and is still used as a symbol in mathematics. Mathematically speaking, the “p” symbol has a numeric value of “8” in the Roman Score while the letter “P” has a numeric value of “16” in the English alphabet. The “p” symbol, which equates to the number 3.14159—repeating to infinity, is an acronym for “infinity” as the “p” fraction goes on forever. Consequently, the aforementioned symbols of Pi or Phi (i.e., “p”, “F” and “P”) are acronyms for Greenland, home of the Roman Empire.


Oblate Spheroid
According to scientists from NOAA, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the true shape of the Earth approximates an oblate spheroid—a sphere flattened along the axis from pole to pole with a bulge around the equator. This particular notion was central to the Greeks and Stoics who adopted a model of celestial spheres after the discovery of the spherical Earth in the 4th to 3rd centuries BC. The myth that the Earth is a basketball-like shape was only adopted during the Middle Ages. To what degree the Earth is an oblate spheroid is not currently known, but it likely mimics the discus-like shape of Earth found in Greco-Roman art.

Earth’s Iron Core
Although Continental Drift has affected the location of the continents over time, the iron core of Earth has always remained at the center. Due to Earth’s disc-like shape, it has a V-shaped iron core, the top of which is Greenland (2) and the bottom of which is Ayers Rock (1) in Australia. Although geologists state that Ayers Rock is dominantly composed of coarse-grained arkose which is white and grey in color, Ayers Rock is unmistakably rust-colored which confirms that it is indeed iron based. This notion was confirmed, albeit in a de facto manner, by the Northern Territory Geological Survey (2002) which found that when relatively fresh, Ayers Rock has a grey color. However, due to weathering of the iron-bearing minerals via the process of oxidation, the outer surface layer of Ayers Rock exhibits a red-brown rusty color. Translation: Although Ayers Rock is not iron it oxidizes due to the iron-bearing minerals found within it. Needless to say, minerals cannot oxide if they are not iron. If Ayers Rock was not solid iron, the non-iron parts of the rock would clearly be evident as they would lack the rusty-like color due to lack of oxidation. This is not the case as the entire rock exhibits a uniform rust color indicative of iron. Despite differing greatly in size, Greenland and Ayers Rock exhibit the same general shape. Aside from confirming that the two are opposite ends of the same pole, it can be deduced that if Ayers Rock is iron, Greenland is as well.

Discus of Earth
The disc-like spherical Earth was likely the single most important issue to the Greco-Roman Empire who were hell bent on world domination, a feat they unfortunately achieved. Consequently, the disc-like shape of Earth is found throughout in their respective art and culture. The classical Greek sculptor Polyclitus created Discophoros, a marble statue featuring a male holding a disc. Diskobolus by Myron is another famous Greek sculpture which also depicts a Greco-Roman male holding a disc. Although these two statues claim to depict a discus thrower, their respective poses are likely symbolic of the Greco-Roman Empire’s control over the Earth. That being said, the discus throw was a Greco-Roman sport which was one of the events of the Greek pentathlon. The discus throw was likely a sporting tribute designed to celebrate the discovery of Earth’s true shape. A discus is also depicted on the Discobolus Motif as well as the Discobolus Kleomelos Louvre, both of which feature a male holding an oversized disc in a non-sportsman-like manner. Due to its importance in Greco-Roman culture, there are at least 60 Roman-English terms (e.g., discern, disciples, disclose, discourage, discovery, discussion, dusk, etc.) relating to conversation, exploration, thinking and science that contain the term “disc”. Other Roman-English terms such as “desk” and “dusk” were likely also derived from “disc”.

Guzman (aka Supersport) #fundie rantsnraves.org

just to clear the record, I am not in any way racist. Just in case anyone forgets, it's me, the creationist who believes skin color is skin deep and not at all the result of "evolution," as probably everyone in here believes. Skin is adaptive just many other human traits.....all it takes is a few minutes in the sun to prove that. Stay out in the sun all day, every day, and your offspring might very well emerge a wee bit darker than you. Over the course of a few generations, this may add up to big differences. But the point is, there is no random mutation and there's definitely no selection.

And to clear the homo thing up, I truly truly love these people. It's just that their bedroom/restroom/carseat activities repulse me and drag society down. So sue me.

Grizzly_Clout #racist reddit.com

Why is there no "no marriage trend" for Africans ? They breed like rats and should stop breeding rn

Imagine hating races but joining a forum because women hate you.

Who the fuck are you, a genetic-deadend, to say who deserves to breed or not when you won't be breeding yourself?

Having said that, I knew a few Africans and they have 3 children minimum. So you're not wrong about their fertility rates. And some of their behaviours aren't good.

Why dont you go and live in Congo then instead of the US? I'm sure it must great there.

Africa has a birth rate of 7 same as rats. They should breeding right now. The world can't handle so many low IQ people

Stomfrontcels mad kek, being a blackcel it makes me so satisfied seeing you guys reeeeee.

I'm not white so stfu

White worshipping is worse .

How is that a white worship ? I didn't even mention white people in my first comment. The less the Africans the better for the world it is.

Stormfrontcels btfo

I'm not white so how am I stormfront ? Low IQ response as I expected

Mostly because I can tell you believe in a racial hierarchy, and don't understand every nation goes through a low iq phase to which they change from industrial revolution to focusing on smarts. China, India good examples of this. You are a stromfrontcel.

IQ is not adopted with time, its genetic just like your muscular facial structure etc. If low IQ phase argument was correct, black people living in white countries would have high IQ but guess what they dont so dont pull this bullshit "wE aRe aLl sAmE". Asians from poor countries like Vietnam Cambodia do much better than blacks living in the USA.

And no I'm persian so fuck stormfront and fuck alt right

Have you even seen Nigeria? Also. Black people living in white countries iqs have been going up with modern education for many years, it's why I'm alot smarter then my mother was, and why my kids will be even smarter. Just because I'm black doesn't make me default low iq lmfao. Jesus your stomfrontcel tendencies are showing. every country goes through an industrial age where Iq isn't as valued dumb ass. Imagine thinking just because your country is ahead in terms of modernism. Means the whole country was just genetically born like that, and that every other country doesn't eventually catch up.

Look man wakanda isnt real and neither is your argument.

No matter what countries blacks live in they are all the same and have same behaviours be it Africa be it Caribbean be it the USA or be the rapefugees in Europe. Also why do you think countries develop? Why hasn't Africa developed yet ? Poverty has nothing to do with IQ level. I saw a documentary of Indian children from slums who had higher IQ despite living in extreme poverty. So is the case with Vietnam Cambodia Myanmar etc. Those countries are piss poor and guess what they do much much better.

I'm of Persian ancestry currently living in Oregon and this Asian kid from Vietnam used to be a top scorer despite being the first generation immigrant form the poor country while the blacks always used to be at the bottom despite living in the states from 100s of years

I'm Persian and not white so dont call me stormfront. Reality can appear racist sometimes. You're behaving like those foids who when they run out of arguments call you a racist incel nazi lmao stop coping man

Kek imagine thinking just because you haven't studied the statistics and trends, means that suddenly I'm wrong and I'm coping with "Wakanda". Dude, you obviously feel superior because you are ahead in terms of modernism, America felt the same before they saw China come from low iq farmers to now on the brink of ruling the world in the span in as little as 40 years. Study up on the industrial revolution, and how this shit works bro, I noticed you had nothing to respond to my Nigeria thing, because you understand modernism varies by country. But muh wakanda, I'm so superior wahhh. Kek, hope that superior facade helps you cope with the fact your superior race rejected your genetics.

“NIGERIA.”

the whole country is under the influence of Chinese and Indian companies. Every single infrastructure and companies are owned by them. Meanwhile Nigerian women are busy producing 7 kids each.

“Chinese low IQ farmers.”

More like poor farmers. Chinese people were never low IQ. They had great ancient civilization and various dynasties invented and created so many things in the past. Even after getting massacred by the Japanese in world wars dealing with extreme poverty, there were cases of poor Chinese kids of doing good at math and science. They were just piss poor. The poor Chinese who migrated from China after world wars to the USA are nowhere doing as poor as the African Americans. In fact Chinese are the smartest.

“industrial revolution.”

Man stop coping. God didn't give those Europeans and Asian all the wealth they have today. They earned with their brains and hard work which Africans clearly lack and please dont blame colonialism for your misery cuz much of Asia was colonized too at some point of time. You Africans couldn't even manage the rails and roads given to you the colonials lmao.

And you haven't answered my question, why do Africans living in the USA are just as bad as their counterparts in Africa despite being in the states for 100s of years? According to your argument , blacks living in the USA should do much better but they dont

“colonialism, segregation and slavery.”

All of those were experienced by most countries in Asia and in a very extreme manner but media only highlights Africa. China was same as Africa when the world war ended. They were completely buttfucked by the japanese with massacre slavery and poverty. Didn't stop them from being one of the world's super power today.

Same goes with South Korea, they were absolutely fucked after the world wars and Korean wars , poverty was rampant but look at them today. India was colonized and looted by the British for 200 years and today they are sending satellites in Mars and moon

So what's stopping Africa from growing? It's clearly not the past and poverty like you guys like to cry... it's the IQ level.

It will stop once China finishes cucking them. In post-industrial societies birth rates plummet.

I seriously hope ricecels btfo these rapefugees from wakanda

BHarlan #racist conservapedia.com

I personally do not think race determines character or value, but Obama (and his racist preacher Wright) focused on skin color for decades. Is it any surprise, then, than the Whitehouse website now has pictures of 9 people, 7 of whom are Black?

In fact, the 3 people who aren't celebrities are all Black. The odds of that, given that 1 out of every 8 Americans is Black? Less than 0.2%! I do not object to any skin color on whitehouse.gov, but the probabilities make this look like Obama must be trying to send a message about what he values.

Jon Miller #wingnut conservativereview.com

If you want firsthand experience of what it’s like to be discriminated against, all you have to do is put on a MAGA hat and walk down the street.

At best, you’ll get some dirty glares. You might be denied service, à la 1960s lunch counters. You might get your hat knocked off. At worst, you’ll get blamed for your own son’s death. That is what happened to BlazeTV host Eric Bolling while he was minding his own business recently at the Trump Hotel in Washington, D.C.

This pathetic excuse of a human being came up to Bolling and said, “Eric Bolling’s son killed himself because he was embarrassed by his dad,” according to the host. Eric’s son, Eric Chase Bolling, died in 2017 from an accidental drug overdose.

Video captured a man who appeared gleeful, even proud of what had just occurred. That is because Trump supporters are viewed by leftists as subhuman beings whose very existence makes them justifiable targets for physical or verbal assault.

At the time, Eric was hanging out with Hayden Williams, another Trump supporter who was recently punched in the face by an unhinged leftist at UC Berkeley due to his support for the president.

See the pattern? What’s worse is that these leftists pretend to be civil rights warriors while subjecting people to the same kind of disgusting, discriminatory behavior Republicans fought to end in the 1960s.

It used to be that discrimination was fast becoming a thing of the past. It would only pop up when shameless race-hustlers tried to make excuses for belligerent criminals like OJ while knowing full well race had nothing to do with it. When liberals tried to paint attacks on Obama’s Marxism as racist, I used to remind them, “I’m a black guy who grew up in the ’90s and I have never been discriminated against a day in my life. It’s not about Obama’s skin color. It’s about his crappy ideas!” But I can no longer say I’ve never been discriminated against, not because of my skin color but because of my political views. Then, of course, leftists try to turn it into a race issue by calling me racist names like “house n*gger” and “Uncle Tom” for having the wrong political views.

Nevertheless, because of these views, I can now say I know what it feels like to be persecuted. Recently, I went to order from a food truck with my friend Joel Patrick. Joel is a black Trump supporter who wears his support for the president not just on his sleeve, but on his head and his chest too, and we were essentially denied service. We waited for roughly 20 minutes while being completely ignored by everyone working there. I tried to give them the benefit of the doubt by assuming they were just busy, but the minute we walked away because they took an eternity to even acknowledge our existence, they gladly greeted the next customer who wasn’t in MAGA gear with prompt and friendly service.

If my grandmother were still alive, we would have been able to bond over how it feels to be denied service by Democrats.

I am fortunate that being denied service is the worst that’s happened to me, because, as Eric Bolling can attest, it could be a lot worse. Every week, it seems, there’s a new video of someone being harassed or assaulted because they dared to wear a MAGA hat out of the house.

Most notably, the Covington Catholic High School students were not just harassed, they were smeared by the national press. They were slandered by the media. They were sent death threats. People said they would bomb their school. All because they expressed support of the president.

Maddie Mueller (no relation to the man who sadly couldn’t deliver this weekend) is fighting her school because the administration actually tried to ban her from wearing a MAGA hat on campus. Gunnar Johansson’s family is trying to get to the bottom of what happened when his MAGA hat was yanked off of his head by a school bus aide. Logan Jones was suspended for wearing a MAGA sweatshirt and holding a Trump flag. A woman in Massachusetts was arrested for allegedly assaulting Bryton Turner, a man who dared to wear a MAGA hat to a Mexican restaurant. Even our elders aren’t spared. Just last month, an 81-year-old man was attacked for wearing his MAGA hat, and a 19-year-old was arrested for the assault.

What is happening here? It’s an epidemic. You cannot walk out of your house and be safe if you support the president. These leftists justify their actions by saying those who wear a MAGA hat may as well be members of the KKK. But it is actually those assaulting people in the streets and verbally tormenting them who more closely resemble the Klan.

History will not be kind to those who tried to take America several decades back into the past. And it will treat them particularly harshly because of the shockingly divisive hatred the Left is using to do it, all while shamelessly claiming the mantle of tolerance.

Carlos Whitlock Porter #racist #psycho #crackpot #homophobia cwporter.com

IN PRAISE OF AIDS

AIDS is a communicable disease of the Negro race, the non-white races, the racially mixed, and all persons that mix with Negroes (Hispanics, Jews, race-mixers, drug addicts, homosexuals, etc).

Among whites, it is estimated that 5% of Italians and 14% of Swedes are in fact racially immune to AIDS. They are said to possess the G2-fast gene, exclusive to certain members of the White Race and providing full immunity if passed on by both parents.

Since AIDS is a disease of minority groups, the only concern of the liberals, predictably enough, is to protect their "civil rights". Carriers must therefore be exempt from all laws applying to the carriers of other diseases (such as syphilis or typhoid). Insurance companies must be prohibited from asking any questions designed to determine whether or not an individual may or may not be a carrier. All laws against homosexual activity, no matter how lenient, must be abolished. Negroes must be encouraged to screw white girls at all costs. No problem!

NKP_Vet #fundie freerepublic.com

This sodomite attempt to destroy all morals in this country will never end as long as God-less democrats, let by the muslim Obama,continue to call the shots. If Obama is reelected, I guarantee you he will get on national TV and tell the world that sodomites have the right to get married and he is strongarming a bill through Congress to have DOMA overruled and that states have no right deciding who can and can not get married. Churches all over the country will be mandated to perform sodomite “marriages”, under threat of having the church closed down. The will also tell the Boy Scouts of any other organization they can not “discriminate” action a minority and that sodomites are in the same class as women and blacks, which is absolutely BS because you have no say so about what sex you are born or the color of your skin. There is no such thing as a sodomite gene, and it a learned trait. Elect Obama and this garbage will absolutely never end.

Padraig Martin #racist identitydixie.com

[From ""Distinguishing Southern Nationalism"]

Over the last week or so, I have received criticism for my attacks on generic White Nationalism, the so-called Alt-Right and Nazi LARPers. Generally, these are attacks from weak keyboard kommandos and obese geriatric geldings, some of whom mistook the original intended target. Regardless, given the reaction, it seems I struck a nerve. Good!

The vast majority of those who threw threats in my direction could not bench press an AR-15. Some of those who took shots at the latest round of strategic posts are intellectually too soft to see past their myopic understanding of our current predicament. Bowl Patrol? If you cannot see that someone like Dylann Roof would have done more strategically for “White People” by not being a psychopath, actually engaging in positive networking and community fellowship, then you lack strategic clarity. You are inferior in every single way – mentally and morally. You are useless. Go back to whatever leader du jure of your movement is taking pictures of himself in his underwear.

If you are serious about doing something for your people, let’s take an honest look at the differences within the movement: Southern Nationalism vs Generic White Nationalism.

Identity Dixie is a Southern Nationalist content producer. That is who we are. Generally speaking, ours is a fraternal group that seeks to build a Nationalist consensus within the South. The goal is to intellectually and emotionally lay the ground work for an independent South. Some members of Identity Dixie are also members of other groups that have aligned goals, but at their core, Identity Dixie contributors work the Southern zeitgeist. We are not the guys on street corners or running around in the woods playing Rambo on the weekends. We are the guys who convince the normie Southerner that he has a better future in a Free South.

What Identity Dixie is not is a generic White Nationalist entity. We obviously do not hate White people, but not all White people are the same. The Whites who call themselves Anti-Fascists are not my White people. Nor for that matter are Boston Brahmins. I went to graduate school with Boston Brahmins, they hate you and me. Generic White is simply not a good enough distinction.

I will root for White people in other areas of the country to do well, but they are not my own. Not all Whites are made equal. The German-American descendants of the 48ers, who comprise the rank and file of both AntiFa and the Alt-Right, have very little in genetic common with me other than skin color. The only ideological difference between the two groups is their brand of genocidal collectivism (one being crusty anarcho-communism, with a simmering hatred for Heritage America, and the other some form of authoritarianism, as long as it’s pro-white). Otherwise, they are almost identical. Their general hatred of Christianity and their support for socialism are entirely foreign concepts to me.

One other key similarity between AntiFa and the Alt-Right is their assumption that they will save the United States. True Southern Nationalists have no interest at all in saving the Empire. The United States is dead. It is a stinking, rotting carcass. The smell of its decomposition is evident in the Affirmative Action company commander, with an 85 IQ, leading your Southern enlisted sons into battle. She graduated with a 4.0 GPA from West Point because her Marxist professors wanted to achieve a social justice objective. White people did that. More specifically, Northern Whites empowered this marginally literate officer. Had she gone to the Virginia Military Institute, her inferior self would have transferred to Richmond Community College before she completed Hell Week. Now, her Communist Chinese counterpart is laughing, confident that he can beat an army led by incompetents in a week. He is right.

You can thank Northern Whites for your modern country.

And before you give me a diatribe about the JQ, just stop. Whites founded America. Prior to its existence, it was a massive forest comprised of wild savages, hunting and enslaving one another. They were conquered by Europeans. Towns and cities were erected by Whites. Institutions were established by Whites. If we assume Whites are superior, how did they let everything get taken by a tribe of Khazar gypsies? Let’s face a cold hard fact: three percent of the population did not weasel their way into power. Heritage Americans got lazy and gave it away – the same as they did when they sent their manufacturing to China. Specifically, Northern Whites gave it away. If I want to be even more specific, a cabal of Boston Yankees and German 48ers from the Midwest and Pennsylvania gave away the country that Anglo-Saxons and Scots-Irish built.

Why in God’s name would I want to align myself with the same Whites who get an occasional generational itch to dismantle the South?

Northern Whites first dismantled the antebellum South, a White dominated society, through a mass invasion. Northern Whites literally raped, pillaged, and starved Southerners, compelling them to remain in a Union against their will. Then they not only freed the slaves, they empowered them in local positions of governance throughout Reconstruction. Suddenly, I am supposed to look past their history and find myself aligned with their descendants because we share the same skin color?

Less than one hundred years later, the grandparents of these same generic White Nationalists lamented segregation. They demanded that the 101st Airborne march into Arkansas and impose integrated schools. It was a Wisconsin White gunman, Arthur Bremer, descendant of a 48er, who shot segregationist, George Wallace. Northerners later fought to reduce his sentence and they succeeded.

If the apple does not fall far from the tree, why would I now suddenly align myself with the grandkids of Midwestern Marxists? No thank you. Rather, I will align myself with my father’s people, many of whom fought and died to protect the Anglo-Celtic society upon which the South is based.

The fact is, the Alt-Right is full of socialists. They were raised praising Sherman, Grant, and Eisenhower – men who destroyed the South. They love themselves some Lincoln. They have nothing in common with Southerners. They cannot be trusted. So what if some guy in Vermont or Pennsylvania flies a Confederate Battle Flag? How edgy, bruh! That may resonate with your fellow militant egalitarians who equate imagery with purpose. It simply tells me the guy has nice taste in flags.

At the end of the day, generic White Nationalism is a fool’s endeavor. It is bound to fail. Southern Nationalists know they will have to go it alone. The socialists who comprise the majority of the rank and file of White Nationalists want to revive an American corpse.

In sum, keep your generic White Nationalism. Keep your bowl patrol. Keep your pagan imagery. This is not about optics for me. This is not about some short term edgy phase in my life. The Southerners with whom I daily interact are the legacy of a multi-generational quest to establish their own country, predicated on hierarchical stratification, Anglo-Saxon norms, and Christian values. We may not be perfect, but at the end of the day, we are not LARPy pseudo-Nazis.

Good luck and enjoy your pool parties.

sale123 #racist alternatehistory.com

(The user was banned for the post)

This is a very difficult question...What characteristics would this new race of humans have ?There is more to race then skin color.

A quote comes to mind "Equality is a lie… A myth to appease the masses''.Granted the quote comes from a sith lord (who aren't exactly known for their upstanding moral character) but that does not make it any less true.To claim that human races are equal to one another in ability is foolishness.All evidence points to the contrary.

The real problem the western world faces is forced diversity.Here is a good read on the subject.Racism is to be expected given our current situation.White people are being subjected to a form of ethnic cleansing in every country they live in.They are also the least racist race amusingly enough.The sheer amount of black on white crime in america is insane.Rotherham also shows what happens when western countries accept so many immigrants from third world countries.

Diversity is a truly terrible thing.If everyone were to suddenly become the same race ?Race based discrimination would probably stop but not very much would change if skin color is all that changed.The muslim jihadists would still keep trying to take over europe by immigrating and outbreeding the native populations like they are now.Africa would still remain a third world hellhole despite it's abudant resources because the people living there would still retain their depressingly low IQ's and so on.All that this would accomplish in the end would probably be the destrucion of many unique cultures which we have today.

Navaros #racist imdb.com


[statements in quotes are from the poster Navaros was answering]

"then why does Tessa Thompson’s character’s boyfriend, a white man, come off as the character who’s the most honest, has the most integrity and isn’t vilified for his skin color? "

He doesn't. You make it sound like he is some kind of deep, multi-dimensional character! ROFL. He's a one-dimensional cardboard cut-out. His only point in the film is to provide sex scenes which demonstrate that the main heroine character is a slut. But of course, being liberal nutjob propaganda, the film tries to represent her sluttiness as a good thing to be glorified.

And yes, he is vilified for his skin color by the black thugs who hate him because he is banging the heroine slut that they want all to themselves (even though some of them are also banging her simultaneously).

"by the way, “racistly" isn’t a word."


If I say it, it's a word. If it wasn't a word before I said it, then it has become a word henceforth after I've said it.

"it needs to start with thorough education on all parties to teach people from an early age the harm of superiority."


If you really believe that, then you should be condemning this film and this TV show for promoting black superiority.

Mark Tapson #racist #wingnut frontpagemag.com

Make Western Civilization Great Again

Universities have been ceding ground to anti-Western activists for decades now (remember Jesse Jackson leading chants of “Hey ho, hey ho, Western civ has got to go” at Stanford back in the ‘80s?). So it should come as no surprise that Yale recently announced it would grant yet another concession to multiculturalist students who demand that diversity of skin color replace the oppressiveness and irrelevance of Dead White Males: this spring will see the end of one of the school’s previously most popular classes, a survey course called “Introduction to Art History: Renaissance to the Present.”

According to the Yale Daily News blog, in its final iteration the course will shift from transmitting to students a greater appreciation of their cultural heritage, to a more “woke” focus on subverting the canon of Western art itself. The course’s instructor, art history department chair Tim Barringer, has stated that the class will still cover Western art chronologically from 1300 to the present, but he intends to emphasize that other regions, genres and traditions are as “equally deserving of study” as Western art, because according it any special reverence is “problematic.”

As we are all reminded daily now in every cultural arena from academia to Hollywood, anything Western is “problematic” (to put it politely) because multiculturalist doctrine deems that all cultures must be revered equally – except for Western culture which, because of its association with the toxic privilege of “whiteness,” must be denigrated, deconstructed, and dismantled to heal the nonwhite victims of its oppression and exploitation. Thus, we must be careful not to elevate the great works of the greatest artists in world history over other, “equally deserving” genres and traditions.

In a syllabus note to potential students, Barringer wrote that the emphasis would be on the relationship between European art and other world traditions. That is a fair topic for study, considering that Western artists have occasionally been influenced by other traditions: Picasso and African masks, for example (although such influence now would be devalued as “cultural appropriation,” another racist concept concocted by the postmodern and/or Marxist left). But the class also, according to Barringer, will consider art in relation to – wait for it – “questions of gender, class and ‘race’” and will discuss its relationship to Western capitalism. In other words, immersing ourselves in the transcendence and beauty that literally define great art and touch our common humanity must take a back seat to imposing our earthbound interpretations of how art divides us. Climate change also will be a “key theme.” Of course it will, because all intellectual streams now must feed into the river of today’s acceptable groupthink.

The Yale Daily News also reports that Barringer said he will invite students to write an essay nominating a work of art that has been left out of the course’s curriculum or its textbook. “I’m really looking forward to seeing what works the students come up with to counteract or undermine my own narratives,” he wrote. Newsflash, professor: your job is to educate and open the minds of your students, not see what these kids “come up with” to undermine your “narratives.” If they’re coming to school to lecture you and delegitimize your expertise, then what is the point of your job? What is the point of an art history department if art history can be wiped out or rewritten to suit and validate the gender- and race-obsessed whims of youth? Indeed, what is the point of a university anymore if it only exists to conform to the arrogant demands of children drunk with the power of their own dogmatic wokeness?

This change in the History of Art Department follows the Yale English Department’s decision in 2017 to “decolonize” its degree requirements after students presented a petition demanding that a survey course called “Major English Poets be abolished, and that the pre-1800/1900 requirements be refocused to deliberately include literatures relating to gender, race, sexuality, ableism, and ethnicity.” Yale caved then as well, making the course introducing English majors to such luminaries as Shakespeare, Chaucer, Milton, Spenser, Wordsworth, and Eliot “optional.” Meanwhile students can choose from such other options as “Black and Indigenous Ecologies,” “The Politics of Museums,” and “U.S. Afro-Latinx Literatures.”

Like far too many other universities, Yale quite simply has given students who have traded any sense of intellectual humility for belligerent activism too much power to determine the direction of their own edification. As the Yale Daily News notes, the art history major has adapted to changes “suggested” by students pushing to increase minority and female representation. The Director of Undergraduate Studies Marisa Bass noted, for example, that students have prompted the creation of art history courses like “Global Decorative Arts” and “The Politics of Representation.” She didn’t say whether there would be room in one of those courses for a truly notable “global decorative art” such as the breathtaking genius of Michelangelo’s Sistine Chapel paintings (pictured above). Presumably, that would be “problematic” because Michelangelo is not representative of the correct skin color and genitalia that some students have declared must be prioritized.

There is nothing wrong with a history of world art survey course that examines art from all over the world. But the de-emphasis of Western art at a major university in a course whose time frame begins with the European Renaissance, and the administrative kowtowing to a very vocal minority of politicized students, is an intentional devaluation of our own civilizational achievements and does a disservice to students who need to be roused from the anti-Western indoctrination they are subjected to now from kindergarten onward. Teaching that our own culture has a “problematic” history while uncritically revering every other tradition is anti-intellectual, bigoted, and self-loathing. And downgrading our appreciation for and comprehension of great art to examining it in terms of its racial and class dynamics is reductionist and divisive.

It's time for our universities to help make Western civilization great again.

Dave Daubenmire #fundie #pratt newswithviews.com


I’ve about had it up to my once water-breathing gills with this whole whitey hates blackie thing. Coming on the heels of a made-up pandemic the idea that the greatest evil facing America is racism is more than my once-monkey evolved brain can handle.

“Minds full of mush” is what Rush Limbaugh once called them; Human brains that will believe just about anything that some expert feeds them. “Please don’t feed the humans” should be the warning label on every TV in America.

Even though I would love to talk about the phony charges of racism that are spewed 24/7 on America’s airwaves I have decided to take a different tack and discuss another means of discrimination that very few people are willing to talk about. In fact, the thoughts my hunt-and-peck digits are tapping out may cover an area of thought that no one has ever programmed you with.

I am referring to the very common form of discrimination known as FAITHISM.

“I’ve never heard of that before” your CNN wired cerebral cortex may be beeping. “What the heck is faithism? Anderson Cooper has never mentioned that before, and if I haven’t heard of it from one of their expert guests so it certainly can’t be real.”

Well, racism isn’t real either. It is a made up word. It was a condition created by the CIA in the early 1930’s and was designed to be used to divide and conquer the American people. I won’t go into details about it in this rant, but as the carnival barker would likely say “read all about it.” RACISM IS MADE UP. Check out THIS LINK if you really want to know the truth.

Save me the emails. Racism is made up. It only exists in our minds…planted there by nefarious forces intent on destroying America. I’m sorry if Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, and Juan Williams have hustled your mind into believing it. There is only one race…human. Period. Skin color is not a race.

So I decided to coin a phrase that is just as prevalent and just as destructive to America and that is Faithism. Never heard of it, huh? Well, stick around and maybe we can get another group of Americans all riled up.

Faith is defined by Mr. Webster as “Belief; the assent of the mind to the truth of what is declared by another, resting on his authority and veracity, without other evidence; the judgment that what another states or testifies is the truth.”

Nearly everything you and I believe is based on faith. Any story you read about an historical figure is faith-based because you have no firsthand knowledge of the veracity of the information. I BELIEVE George Washington existed, but I can’t actually prove it. I have to trust that the historical record is true. In all of my life’s work I have never heard anyone tell me that they didn’t “believe” in George Washington. Most of us simply trust the history books.

The same holds true for Darwinism. I never met the guy, but from what I understand he wrote a book about “The Origin of Species” and even though I am familiar with it I have never met anyone who can prove he wrote it or that the information he presents in it is true. I simply take it on faith that he existed and that his theories are true.

By the way…a theory is a theory because there is no proof. Darwin’s theory is actually FAITH based because there were no eye-witnesses to verify what he postulates. Darwin’s theory has less scientific PROOF than the THEORY expounded upon in the book of Genesis. Both theories are lacking PROOF and can only be believed through FAITH.

FAITHISM is nothing more than the discrimination of one belief system over another based solely on the opinion of the one promoting the theory. Zoo keepers often have faith in Darwin and his acolytes while most Christians have faith in God and his evangelists.

A fair evaluation of the origin of man would certainly contain BOTH unproven theories. To choose one set of theories over another would be the ultimate discrimination. Despite what you have been taught in government schools, discrimination is a good thing. To discriminate is defined as “the act of making or observing a difference.” It has nothing to do with the buzz word “racism.”

But the nub of the issue is that both sides are not presented. “Science” always trumps “faith” when dealing in the secular world. “Religious” beliefs are always pooh poohed in favor of “science” even though much of what we believe about science is based completely on faith.

Racism is defined as prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one’s own race is superior.” Even racism is built upon a BELIEF and not a fact.

FAITHISM would be defined as “prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different worldview based on the belief that one’s own belief system is superior.”

Faithism is rampant in our society. Those in authority do not allow both systems of BELIEFS to be treated fairly. The theory of Darwin is presented freely and openly to America’s public school children while the theory of Creationism is forced to the back of the bus. Faithism is everywhere you look and there has been nothing as destructive to our American society as the second class treatment afforded Americans who put their faith in the God rather than in Darwin.

“People of faith” are the most discriminated against citizens in this country. Most of our problems would go away if we simply taught ALL children the 10 Commandments of God.

Our schools teach our children that they evolved from apes and we are shocked when they begin to act like monkeys. Amoral education leads to immoral behavior. Christian beliefs are given second class treatment in this nation.

America’s Christian history is being rewritten. Statues are being torn down. Faithism is worse than racism. Content of character is more important than skin color.

Colonel-Knight-Rider #racist deviantart.com

{Archived source: http://archive.is/M0cMz}

The way I see it, Black Lives Matter started out well-intentioned but has since become as corrupt and violent as the newsworthy police officers they oppose. According to George Floyd's brother Terrence, who's suffering the most from losing George, this level of violence that's giving people in LA another reason not to leave their houses—my brother included—is not something the late George would've wanted or supported. In his words, "Y'all doing nothing because that's not going to bring my brother back at all."
Yes, I believe that black lives matter. Think of the rich scientific, political, religious, artistic, musical, and literary contributions the black community has made for the benefit of the great nation that is the United States! But how many other lives have to be taken regardless of skin color before it's universally accepted that black lives matter? There is a better way than violent wars or verbal wars. I know it!
Speaking of which, I'm not a black person, but I know what it's like to be discriminated against. I once had a Hispanic teacher in my 2-year college days who gave lower grades to black, white, and Asian students all alike while championing Hispanic students. She even admitted to racism against whites when she said she was astounded that one of my high-scoring assignments came from a white person, implying that she thought of anyone not belonging to La Raza as intellectually inferior. Long story short, she doesn't work at my 2-year college anymore, and I didn't have to organize a violent protest to get her fired. Still, because of this experience, I can empathize with people of other races who've been judged based on skin color. Yes, being given lower grades based on race is not as severe as being arrested and killed based on race, but discrimination is discrimination no matter the level of severity or who the victim race is. And senseless violence is not the key to ending it. In my case, all I had to do was testify anonymously.
Unfortunately but unsurprisingly, a lot of left-wing corporations like the ever-woke Disney are in favor of the awful violence and destruction instead of supporting peaceful conflict resolution and use of words, not weapons, as means of stripping racism of its power.

Beau Toxx #racist moonbattery.com

The African-American community (97% and 95%), including Hank Aaron, voted twice for an un-vetted, inexperienced, unqualified, incompetent President with a hidden past, corrupt colleagues, and indiscrete personal indulgences. The African-American community's overwhelming vote and support was and is based solely on the color of Barack Obama's skin and nothing else. I would like Mr. Aaron to explain who didn't get the memo; "judge an man on the content of his character (and qualifications), not the color of his skin." Republicans? Whites? Really?! I would also like to remind Mr. Aaron that the founders of the KKK were Dixie Democrats, the governor who stood in the doorway of the University of Alabama to prevent segregation was George Wallace, a Democrat. Democrats overwhelmingly voted against the 1964 Civil Rights Act, including Al Gore's father! The South had historically been Blue states!Finally, Mr. Aaron please don't taint you reputation in your old age by being a "useful idiot" of the Progressive/Marxists.

Anonymous Coward #conspiracy godlikeproductions.com

THE WORST SMELLING PEOPLE ARE REPTILIANS!!! It's true!!

They purposely release these foul odors directly from their skin to disgust people to intentionally make them feel sick and awful!

They also do it to make people want to avoid them so that they can more easily hide that they are reptilians, and hide all the abnormal things about them that they do not want people to know!

Yes, anyone who has a straight out STRANGE and foul smelling smell to them is a reptilian!!!

This does not count guys who smell like NORMAL BO after doing a big workout, lol, unless they smell abnormally strong, or most of all if the odor itself is NOT NORMAL, like if the odor itself is a worse smell!!!


I have not actually looked into this and taken time to smell other people obviously hahaha, I have just observed it over the years just like anyone else!

I have noticed that bad smelling and also the worst smelling people/people who have the worst kinds of odors coming off the are noticeably physically unattractive!!!

Sometimes these odors are not on people all the time, they will randomly come from them and smell AWFUL and STRANGE, and then go away, that is them deliberately releasing strange substances from their skin to disgust people on purpose!

Gardendale #racist theroot.com

A judge told a mostly white suburb near one of the blackest cities in the country that—after reviewing all of the facts—she believed the town’s request to separate itself was motivated by race. She stressed that the move could encourage feelings of racial inferiority among the district’s black students. The judge chastised the white citizens for trying to minimize school desegregation laws. Then, with a pound of her gavel, she allowed them to do it anyway.

Just north of Birmingham, Ala., sits the tiny suburb of Gardendale. While Birmingham’s 74 percent black population ranks it as America’s fourth-blackest city, Gardendale’s population is 88 percent white. Gardendale’s median family income is more than double that of Birmingham, too, giving the small town a lucrative tax base. In recent years, most of Birmingham’s affluent suburbs have left the struggling Jefferson County Schools’ system to form smaller districts, but until now, a judge had never examined the racial reasons and implications as closely, according to a report by the Washington Post.

U.S. District Judge Madeline Haikala heard the case of Jefferson County Board of Education v. Gardendale City Board of Education and issued an extensive, wide-ranging ruling Wednesday. The case was not overly complex and was mostly black vs. white. The white residents of Gardendale wanted to break away from the county’s schools, creating a new district that reflected the demographics of the city. The parents of black students in Gardendale’s schools said the white parents just wanted to get rid of the schools’ black students.

In her 190-page ruling, Haikala admitted that Gardendale City’s motivations were based on race and inequality. She pointed to a Facebook group with thinly veiled racist messages and wrote about flyers that listed “some of the best” white schools that had already left Jefferson County Schools alongside a list of “bad” racially mixed schools, with a white child asking, “Which one will you choose?” The report noted that the flyers delivered an “unambiguous message of inferiority.” The ruling reprimanded the parents for their continued reference to “Smithfield kids” (a reference to a mostly black section of Jefferson County whose children attend Gardendale schools) in a degrading manner.

The ruling extensively referenced desegregation cases and how they impacted her ruling. The judge explicitly admitted that race seemed to be Gardendale’s primary motivation, finding such to be worse than some of the desegregations of the civil rights era, writing:

"Given these findings, the Court would be within its discretion if it were simply to deny Gardendale’s motion to separate. Were it not for a number of practical considerations, the Court would do just that. As was the case in Stout II, though, some of the circumstances surrounding Gardendale’s attempt to separate are deplorable ..."

Deplorable. But even though she saw that Gardendale’s motives were based on the idea that the school district’s black students were inferior; even though she noted that it would set back the county’s desegregation efforts to make schools equal; and even though it would negatively impact the black students who already attend Gardendale schools, she allowed Gardendale to move forward anyway.

“It’s hard to square,” said Monique Lin-Luse, an NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund lawyer who represented black parents.

No one could figure it out. However, the Gardendale parents were ecstatic.

“We know that the community is anxious and ready to achieve its goal of a locally led public school system. We are, too,” said Chris Segroves, the new board’s president.

There are no quotes from the black students who will all have to attend new schools, knowing it is only because of the color of their skin.

BlackPillEnema #sexist reddit.com

Just go to therapy bro, it's good for you bro

image

Group therapy is a fuckfest. I remember the white Chadlite in my group fucked both of the Asian girls in the group and essentially became king of everything because he was the top of the loser hierarchy, while my balding ass and the Indian manlet who would sit next to me got nothing. The Indian kid would try to tell jokes and no one else would even pretend to laugh at them.

Anytime there are females in a male group, they force a hierarchy on them by sexually selecting winners and losers.

yep, 1 woman completely changes the entire dynamic. saw it happen in every hobby/friend group i was ever a part of. maybe if every dude wasn’t such a thirsty retard.

We're all animals. If we weren't incels we would likely be trying to do the exact same thing. I wish I could honestly say I would act better than Chads and Normies if I was attractive to women, but I probably wouldn't. I think incels are like Bernard Marx from Brave New World, we are only virtuous so long as we remain incels, the second we ascend, we forget everything we learned before and become the normies that we hated in the past.

No, if I ever ascended, I would take the sobering experience of the Black Pill with me. I’d never let myself become the platitude-invoking normie or the slap-her-ass Chads I hate.

That's what you want to believe, the same way Bernard Marx believed he was actually a man of principles but then he got a taste of the good life and he became one of the vulgar, only for Chad John Savage to become disappointed with him.

How did you even endure group therapy? In the UK they banned the sale of all psychoactive substances ripping my only cope out of my hands and sending me in to acute withdrawal. I replaced my cope pills with alcohol and it was a fucking disaster, throwing up in public and passing out alone in parks. I went to AA and it made everything worse, i seem to be a magnet for the mentally ill. I am unable to say no and after the meeting was pressured in to going for a coffee with a visibly drunk attendee. We both ended up crying in a crowded coffee shop. Never again, i don't see how discussing your problems with other people just as mentally ill as you can help.

The really funny thing was that there were five guys in the group and 7 seven girls. And the only guy who got any was the Chadlite. The Chadlite was an actual mentalcel too, he was asking this lesbian white girl in the group for advice on shit and he ended up pissing off a different girl that he could have potentially fucked as well because he was talking about her behind her back. He was always reading books in public and shit, I don't think he actually learned anything from them, though.

Sarah Palin #fundie videocafe.crooksandliars.com

Well, what we can glean from this is an understanding of why we are all on the road that we are on and it's based on what went into his thinking, being surrounded by radicals. [Obama] is bringing us back Sean to days that... you can harken back to days before the Civil War, when unfortunately too many Americans mistakenly believed that not all men were created equal. And it was the Civil War that began the codification of the truth here in America... yes, we are equal and we all have equal opportunities, not based on the color of your skin.

You have equal opportunities to work hard and to succeed and to embrace the opportunities, god given opportunities to develop resources and work extremely hard and as I say, to succeed.

Now, it has taken all these years for many Americans to understand that that gravity, that mistake, took place before the Civil War and why the Civil War had to really start changing America. What Barack Obama seems to want to do is go back to before those days when we were in different classes based on income, based on color of skin.

Why are we allowing our country to move backwards instead of moving forward with that understanding that as our charters of liberty spell out for us, we are all created equally.

biff #fundie abagond.wordpress.com

Equalism is a religion and any science that indicates no, people are actually pretty different (if we look at groups as a whole), will somehow get ignored or attacked (whereas if the same methodology confirmed equality it would be praised and quoted ad infinitum). To say that there are no formal clear-cut racial classifications in nature goes without saying. For instance, one could separate down to many different groups of white or black people (and where would Indians fit in that dichotomy?). Nevertheless, recent studies have shown that genes can be used to reliably identify someone's ancestry down to a small region (e.g., certain community in Scotland)–and yes there are genes that affect intelligence and genes that affect criminality. And yes, actually racial composition can tell us a lot about a community. Or maybe all those geneticists (mostly white) are just secretly r@cists!

Anyway, I generally agree with jefe's comment (though I think intermarriage won't be as significant as self-segregation, white/Asian flight, at least initially). US will devolve into a Latin American type society. Skin color will still matter, perhaps even more than it does now (interesting to take a look at the past dozen or so Mexican presidents, which is pretty easy with Wikipedia, and compare their complexion with the Mexican/Mexican American janitorial staff you may have come across in the U.S.–might be even more interesting to look at Mexican multimillionaires, who don't have to be elected).

Are blacks treated better in Latin America than in the U.S.? Do they have a better lifestyle and more opportunities? If blacks had actually thought this one through, they would be pushing to "erect a wall".

By the way, so the cartoon seems to make it seem like everything will be all right, ignoring the fact that the country was 90% white before the U.S. decided to let the world in after 1965. Does it seem like everything will be all right in the U.S.? Does it seem like everything is getting better? Do you look around you and see life in the U.S. getting better for the average person? Do you think that tacitly permitting massive illegal immigration from Latin America will help improve the quality of life in the country?

Naturalized-Texan #racist freeconservatives.com

In his famous "I Have a Dream" speech on August 28, 1963, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. said, "I have a dream that my four children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character." Today, more than 43 years after Dr. King's speech, liberals still judge people "by the color of their skin," while conservatives still judge people by the "content of their character."

Liberals force inner-city blacks to beg for government handouts and to live in fear for their lives in squalid slums. Liberals force the children of inner-city blacks to attend sub-standard schools where the main curriculum consists of drugs, gangs, guns, sexual promiscuity, and illiteracy. Liberals consider all inner-city black women of childbearing age to be little more than breeders who are given monetary incentives to produce ever-increasing numbers of welfare babies. Then, if an inner-city black single mother dares to violate liberal welfare rules by allowing the father of her children to live with her and help raise their children, the liberal government social workers punish her by taking away her benefits.

Dr. King must be spinning in his grave over what liberals have done to his people.