Similar posts

HumanSockPuppet #sexist reddit.com

Good day, class. This will be a recap (and expansion) of my original guide to bitch management. In it, you will learn how to manage your bitch(es) by turning your relationship into a game she plays - winning prizes of intimacy for good behaviour, and getting punished with demotion or exile if she fails.
Additionally, this guide will also cover:

What it means to manage a bitch, and the challenges you will face
Why bitch management is ultimately YOUR responsibility
Relationship strategies for maximizing happiness and minimizing drama
How to turn those strategies into lasting positive lifestyle changes

This guide will begin with some basic theory, describing why men are the arbitrators of relationships. It will then establish some common definitions and lay the groundwork for the strategy section afterwards.
As you read this guide, bear in mind that it is a model, not an absolute treatise. You are free (and encouraged) to modify any part of it to suit you. But for the most part, the principles outlined here should be fairly universal.
We say AWALT for a reason.

Disclaimers:

1) In order to sustain a prosperous relationship with a girl, you MUST be comfortable with bossing her around - being a bonafide Patriarch™.
You don't have to be a master of your emotions yet. But at the very least, you must be willing to be firm with her, give her orders, and tell her "no", even against a flood of her tears.

Why? Because ultimately, women get their behavioural cues from men. Remember, women are children: mentally, behaviourally, evolutionarily. They are not like us. They don’t think like us, or have the same deep sense of personal responsibility.

Even the most sociopathic man will intuitively know when he has crossed a boundary and offended another man. Whether or not he feels guilty about it is a different issue, but he at least knows he’s done something wrong. Evolving this instinct was the key to a man’s ability to either strategically make enemies or avoid unwanted conflicts.

Women, on the other hand, evolved no such instinct. On the contrary, women evolved the instinct to push a man’s buttons as a way of testing his willingness to face conflict head-on (what we call shit-testing). A man who is willing to fight against her will also fight FOR her. Likewise, a man who caves before her will most certainly cave before his enemies.

This is why bossing her around is key. She is evolved to push the boundary by picking fights with you. So unless you are strict with your girl, she will become as selfish and insufferable as you let her get away with.

2) A long-term relationship CANNOT be your end goal. You can only be OPEN to the possibility of having one.
Men are the gatekeepers of relationships. Since a relationship is what you have to offer, you mustn’t just give it away. It must be a reward she earns in small doses for inspiring your trust and devotion.

I understand that many of you want a LTR with a good girl – sometimes a series of flings isn’t enough to fulfill you. Believe me, I sympathize.
But winning a LTR is HER problem, not yours. Handing a girl your devotion won’t magically make her worthy of it. When you WANT a LTR too badly, you place your focus on the idea of having a relationship instead of evaluating the girl. You become fixated on your fantasy relationship and selectively ignore the things happening right in front of you: her deep character flaws, her indiscretions, and the red flags.

You must regard women as candidates applying for the job of being your girlfriend – a supporter, a lover, a comfort away from the everyday battles. Don't just hire a bitch because you want the position filled. Make sure you vet your candidates fiercely and hire the right girl for the job.
This guide will help you do just that.

3) This guide will be far less effective if you’re already married.

As a man, your ONLY power in a relationship is the power to revoke your attention, validation, and your time by walking away – sometimes for good. It’s the only strategy you have, but it’s a potent one, and for a very specific reason:
You may want a woman, but women NEED you. The problem with marriage is that it strips you of the ability to completely walk away. Sure, you can still get a divorce, but not without shooting yourself in the foot, possibly losing your children and a significant portion of your hard-earned assets in the process.

Our current social climate is not amenable to marriage. If you’re already married, you have my condolences. If you’re not married but plan on it, then you’re a moron and you have no one to blame but yourself when your mistake comes back to bite you in the ass. And bite you it will.

Theory: The Fundamental Principle of Sex and Relationships

The Fundamental Principle states that women are the gatekeepers of sex, and men are the gatekeepers of relationships. You should be familiar with it by now. If not, educate your ass here.

Beyond a man's Relationship Gate lies a paradise that every girl wants to live in. It is a magical place where pickle jars are opened, spiders are squished, rides are given, appliances are fixed, cuddles are administered, encouragement is provided, and order is firmly established. And all of that requires a man’s time and effort.

As a man, your time and effort is your most valuable asset. You use it to get shit done – most often shit that’s related to Your Mission. When you give that time to someone else, it is a tremendous gift which should be appreciated and respected. This is the key principle behind bitch management. You must demand that a girl appreciate and respect your time.

Some men don’t demand respect for their time. They are too liberal with who they let through their Relationship Gate. They've got no border patrol, no review process. Just a country full of free benefits for anyone who crosses over. These are the beta-orbiters, and they are constantly beset by every vagrant vagina and panhandling pussy that bats its attached eyelashes.

Other men are too strict about admission. They only issue temporary sex visas, and they often deport women without notice. These are the uninterested lone-alphas, and they have chosen a lifestyle of banging and then flying solo. YOU, on the other hand, are open to a LTR with a bitch – IF she earns it.Managing your life and your bitches comes down to awarding her ONLY the time that she has earned. You can decide just how much of your time a bitch has earned by assigning her with a “rank”.


Definitions: An Overview of "Ranks"

We use a lot of terms for describing a relationship with a girl: girlfriend, fiancee, one-night stand (ONS), plate, friend-with-benefits (FWB), etc.
But what do these terms really mean?
From a male perspective, each term implies a different level of investment in the girl – an investment of time, effort, emotions, and other precious male resources. As such, they can be arranged as ranks in order of how much investment each term implies.

Here is a list of ranks we will use (along with working definitions) ordered from least to greatest:
Level 0: One-Night Stand -or- Pump and Dump. You throw a fuck into this girl and never see her again (unless she reaches out to you). It is a single encounter that is casual, sexual, and impersonal. You may or may not have met her before the encounter, and you may or may not even know her name. She is a one-time answer to a physical necessity - nothing more.
Requires no maintenance and a very low investment of time.

Level 1: Plate -or- Fuck Buddy. You have sex with this girl more than once. You will know her name and just enough about her life so you can schedule sexual encounters. You may also know a little bit about her personally, so you can help her rationalize being your fucktoy, assuming she's uncomfortable about the idea of being one. Otherwise, she's down with it and you're both satisfied with being casual. She is a temporary answer to a physical necessity.
Requires some maintenance and a low investment of time.

Level 2: Friends with Benefits. You have sex with this girl more than once - typically as often as mutual convenience allows, but perhaps even when it's not completely convenient for her (because she likes you enough to go out of her way). You also spend non-sexual time with this girl, like eating out or pursuing activities of mutual interest. You know more about her personal life, and she knows more about yours, and as a result the two of you exchange mutual, non-sexual favours from time to time. You will most certainly have good memories of non-sexual time spent with this girl, which will lead to positive emotional investment in her, making her more than just an answer to a physical necessity.
Requires moderate maintenance and a moderate investment of time.

Level 3: Significant Other -or- Girlfriend. The highest level of intimacy a girl can earn. You have sex with this girl often, usually more often than you do any of your other girls. You also spend a considerable amount of non-sexual time with this girl, resulting in many shared memories and a deeper emotional investment. At this level, there is significant mutual concern for the other's well-being. The girl in particular will feel a great dependence on your direct and involved guidance in her life (rather than simple stoicism and confidence). Emotions are strongly felt at this level: affection is especially sweet, and betrayal can be especially bitter.

Requires significant maintenance and a significant investment of time.

Strategy: How She Plays the Game

The game itself is quite simple:
A girl begins the game at Level 0 or Level 1, depending on the context in which you two met.
If you met in a club, or began as total strangers grinding against each other at a house party, she's Level 0.
If you two met in a slightly more sociable manner - perhaps introduced by mutual friends, or she impressed you with her pleasant demeanour after you opened her at the local cafe, she's Level 1. She can also bump up from Level 0 to Level 1 if she reaches out and maintains pleasant and reasonable contact with you after a casual sexual encounter.

From that point on, a girl must perform NON-SEXUAL services for you in order to advance in rank.
These services can include, but are not limited to:
Cooking you a healthy meal. Either at your place or by invitation to hers.
Treating you out some place. A restaurant or an activity of interest to YOU. Bonus points if you've never done the activity but it looks like fun - that means she's really thinking about you.

Buying you a well-thought-out gift. Not just a random thing, but a gift which demonstrates an effort to understand your life and interests (example: therapeutic shoe insoles for a guy who likes running, or high-quality ear buds for a music-lover). The accuracy of her insight is more important than the cost of the gift.

Hand-making you an artistic gift. These might include a picture or painting, a poem, a knitted scarf, a calendar of her photography, and the like. The more personalized the gift, the better. A hand-made gift doesn't have to be highly useful (since making useful things is tough), as long as the gift shows patience, diligence, and an attention to detail.

The greater her investment of time and effort in the gesture, the more credit she earns with you. Eventually, if she shows a consistent pattern of investing effort in you, she can advance in rank by one level.

As previously stated, a girl must invest time and effort in you in order to get your time and effort in return.

Why Do the Services Have to Be Non-Sexual?

Simple. Because a girl doesn't have to exert any effort at all to have sex. If she is attractive enough, all she needs to do to get sex is show up. Someone will fuck her if she makes herself available.
This game only rewards effort. You should also remember this: sex is the most fundamental pre-requisite of any non-platonic interaction between a guy and a girl. You'll never find yourself in a situation where a girl is giving you gifts and cooking you meals, but NOT having sex with you (unless you’re both a coward and too daft to read the signs). If sex isn't happening, then something is terribly amiss and you must either correct it or next her. Which brings us to our next section...

Strategy: Punishment and Demotion

There are many ways in which a girl can make a mistake and upset you. Maybe she starches your shirts too much, or she burns the dinner she was making for you. These kinds of mistakes should not be punished with demotion because, despite her mistake, she is investing time and effort in you. You can think of a suitable punishment and repayment for your lost shirt without going to the extreme of knocking her down a rank.
Instead, demotable offenses should be offenses that are an affront to your dignity, your authority, or to the time and effort you have invested in her.
Offenses can be intentional or unintentional.

Unintentional offenses will usually come in the form of some indiscretion on her part, as she slowly loses attraction for you, her conscious effort wanes, and she slips back into her natural hypergamous state.

Some examples of unintentional offenses are:
Unconsciously being too flirty with another guy (shit-test, can occur at any level).
Failing to keep an important promise (usually by neglect or poor-planning), the consequences of which cost you a substantial amount of money or ANY amount of reputation (failing of respect, this offense will happen at Level 2 or above, since you don't entrust these matters to girls below Level 2).
Neglecting some important duty that you have assigned to her (failing of respect, typically occurs at Level 3).

Frequency of sex decreases, and she absently evades when you try to initiate sex (loss of attraction, can occur at any level).
Committing an unintentional offense should typically result in the demotion of the girl by one (1) rank.
Intentional offenses are far more vulgar than their counterparts. Intentional offenses are usually targeted shit-tests meant to re-assess your fitness. In some extreme cases they might even occur in the presence of friends and family, making them vindictive attacks against your reputation or dignity.

Some examples of intentional offenses are:
Consciously flirting with another guy, trying to arouse jealousy in you (shit-test, can occur at any level).
Openly insulting you (shit-test, can occur at any level).
Frequency of sex decreases, and she consciously and vehemently evades when you try to initiate sex or talk about it (loss of attraction, can occur at any level).
Committing an intentional offense should result in the demotion of the girl by two (2) ranks. Committing a vindictive attack against your reputation should result in a loss of three (3) ranks.

Now, this next part is important, so pay attention:
Once a girl has been demoted, her current level becomes the maximum level she can ever be again. She can only climb the ladder as long as she is flawless in the execution of her womanly duties. Once she commits a serious offense, she is demoted, and she can never rise again.

Some examples of transgressions and appropriate punishments:
A plate (level 1) who fails to provide sex on demand drops one rank to level 0, and she is replaced by a plate who will.
A friend-with-benefits (level 2) who remorselessly loses your expensive digital camera drops one rank and becomes a plate forevermore.
A girlfriend (rank 3) who drunkenly humiliates you in front of your friends at a party drops three ranks to level 0, and you quietly disappear and move on.
Now, I know what you’re thinking. Permanent plate status? Walking away for good? Aren’t these punishments pretty severe?

In reality, the offenses outlined above will generally only occur for one of two reasons:
You’ve slipped up in your duties as a Red Pill man and her attraction for you is beginning to wane.
She doesn’t have the sense to recognize her unworthy behavior because of a failure of parenting that occurred long before you met her.
If it’s reason 1, then you’re at fault, and you’re better off starting from scratch with a new bitch then trying to salvage a relationship that’s on a downward slope. If it’s reason 2, then the girl was never worth your time to begin with, and you simply didn’t know it until now. You can’t turn a ho into a housewife, so don’t even bother trying to reform her.

In general, you must be uncompromising whenever you punish your bitch. Remember what we’ve already established: girls look to you for cues on what’s okay. If you don’t crack down on bad behavior when it happens, a girl’s only assumption is that you are perfectly okay with whatever she’s done. Hypergamy is selfish by nature, and it shows no mercy. Tough love is the only effective response.

There’s also another benefit to being ruthless: meting out uncompromising punishment helps to keep you in abundance mentality. An uncompromising approach helps you to avoid the risk of developing oneitis, and it prevents you from being manipulated by women who are all too good at tugging at your sympathy to get just one/two/five more chances.

Keep your life drama-free by dropping troublesome bitches. With so many eligible bachelorettes out there looking desperately for a strong man like you, no single one of them is worth your grief.

Strategy: Naturalizing the Process

As you learn the rhythm of using rewards and punishments to keep your bitch enthralled, you’ll develop an intuition for how to play your part of the game. The process will become second-nature to you. You’ll naturally become bored with women who fail to show you the proper appreciation, and gravitate towards the ones who make your life more pleasant.

That’s the ultimate goal here: to make you a natural. You’ll never say to your bitch “You’re a level 1 plate now!” or “You’re going down a rank for that shit!” This system is for YOU – so you can have an abstract model with which to understand the game, until managing bitches becomes as natural to you as breathing or blowing a load on her face.

Final Thoughts

The key trait of the modern western woman is her absolute lack of concern for the desires of men. Our cuckold state has all but replaced men as husbands and providers, and so it would seem like the traditional relationship is basically obsolete – that women will never again need to concern themselves with OUR wants. Nothing could be further from the truth.

Though a woman can subsist off the benefits paid for by our taxes, the government cannot give her the love, the attention, the stability, the masculine reassurance, and direct intervention that are so crucial to her emotional well-being. A woman feels vulnerable in a role of leadership, and she feels lost without a masculine leader to boldly claim responsibility for confronting all of the challenges that terrify her. No government can provide that for her. For that, she must come to us.

And for that, we must demand a price.

My hope is that this guide has helped you realize just how much leverage you have in the sexual dynamic – much more than you once thought. Let this guide help you to capitalize on that leverage – for the sake of your happiness, and for the happiness of any woman who works hard enough to earn your time and effort.

Liptusg #sexist reddit.com

Many incels are neurally incompatible with the female personality

This is a topic which has earned some coverage in a lot of the 'proto-blackpill' manosphere communities of their day, and some which relate to it here, but I think it might be worth encapsulating into a more poignant declaration. That is, to address the seeming disparity ( From an outsider's perspective ) between the idealistic yearning to the harsh reality and bring them into reconciliation.

And that is, many of the men who are in the incel demographic ( And I say many because you can still be incel and possess a heavily neurotypical mindset or adhere to certain Bluepilled doctrines ) are both neurodivergent enough, introspective enough and wise enough ( regardless of cognitive ability ) to automatically set themselves completely apart from the spectrum of coexistence with femininity. More succinctly, hypergamy and unattractiveness aside, they just don't have what it takes to put up with the myriad faults of female nature and wouldn't actually be able to find common ground with women even while passing initial mate selection, despite instinctively yearning for the sex or affection.

In a Chad's body, they would be forced to emulate the lifestyle of the exalted Redpiller ideal, the plate-spinner, who pumps and dumps yet never settles down because he is disillusioned with women's behavior as people ( for good reason ) and can't really tolerate all the nonsense or immorality that comes with 'committing' or trying to love one. The 'girlfriend' of his dreams his a mirage, an organism that does not actually exist on earth, a unicorn that acts like a man, not like an actual homo sapiens female.

But let's elaborate more on what that female personality is, and why most of the incels who are, and I'm searching for a term which is actually hard to put into words here - who are ruminative ( a synonym of wise, actually ), not as impulsive, who find themselves operating in a mindset of taking a few minutes in any new situation to existentially ponder the meaning, consequences and rightfulness of their own decisions and those of others ( Something which is predominantly an atypical masculine and non-feminine approach by the way, just look at the gender of most philosophers ), if you find yourself resonating with that, then it is very likely that you will not resonate with femininity under any circumstance.

Any so-called 'potential partner' is going to be predictively broken up with just by witnessing her actions for a minute, before it even has to come to it physically, just like a calculator has the results to your math equation before you even finish going through the motions. The gap between masculinity and femininity is wide enough that keep in mind, even among NPC's, normies, with only a tinge of 'positive masculinity' at it's finest and a flat 0 at Wisdom score, it is still the number 1 factor in the breakup rates of couples and why they change relationships like socks. Whether it be the man realizing he's being used as a status object and getting sick of it or the woman deciding he isn't good enough for her anymore, they just either didn't have the foresight to see it or they never actually cared and well long-term plate spinning ( Or Chad-fishing ). Look at how surprised some of the participants in say, Jersey Shore are, when their relationship which was built on superficial normie trash breaks down over superficial normie trash. Does it surprise anyone else? Here's a secret for the smug women and bluepillers reading this - you are merely one level above them. Your superficial relationships founded on social status, body language, 'ambitions' and looks ( as much as you hate to admit it ) are just one tiny iteration above tan spray and club swagger.

Now let's elaborate more on what is female personality and why it's so discordant to any man who can't bring himself down to it's level. First of all, when I say female personality, I mean it - there is literally just one, it is, contrary to all protestations, a monolith. You know who's the chief proponent of this theory? Women. Every time a woman tells you "You don't understand what women want", or "No woman is ever going to touch you with a 10-foot of stick if you do X" and "Women like a man who is BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH" and "You creep women out when..", they're all confirming it. I bring it up to them every single time that they make an affirmative statement about women, and they always remain speechless.

Liking one horror movie over the other or preferring hiking over Netflix, being a ballerina or psychologist, wearing this crop-top instead of those short-shorts, political alignment, religion, none of these are necessarily core personality differences. You could manufacture a robot that does all of the above combined, programming to vote and to recite lines from books ( AKA female ideology and spirituality ) included. When it comes to truly 'groundbreaking' distinctions, AWALT. All the female dating profiles on reddit might as well be procedurally generated templates of each other, starkly separate from the male ones. When it comes to opinions, when is the last time that the women of AskWomen, of TrollX, of IT, of CreepyPM's, of Tumblr, anywhere, had a major debate or fracture over something to the extent male demographics do? What's the number of women coming here, or to ForeverAlone, or to Men'sRights ( While there are female MRA's like the HoneyBadgers, check out the ratio between female MRA's to male feminists ) or to MGTOW in order to get our perspective things in a non-confrontational way to the same extent men visit even the most radical female spaces to offer their whiteknighting support? When was the last time female IT users disagree with each other about men's role in the universe? When was the last time a woman went 'Nobody wants to date an X' and instead of getting 5000 upvotes and 'yu go gurl' from other women, got a debate from other women instead, similarly to how there are always men who would be willing to say they wouldn't mind something in a woman that even most people would, including extreme insecurities or mental illnesses or weight or clinginess or what have you? Ein gender, Ein matriarchy, Ein hamster.

Well, is the unified female monolith at least a force of goodness? It is not. Let us actually skip over the known and rehashed attributes of hypergamy, superficiality, manipulativeness, capriciousness, solipsism and frivolity which have earned femininity the scathing rebukes it's received from pretty much almost every society to ever walk the earth until the point where they leveraged sex in order to shame everyone from even thinking about doing it. Let's focus on how women perceive themselves to be on their 'best behavior', which, you might be surprised to find out, is not at all working in their favor coming as it is from a brain so philosophically bankrupt and so out of tune with the evolutionary higher faculties of ( And I don't mean intelligence, that is what they think it means, because they can't grasp it ) mankind that it doesn't realize why would anyone reject it's framework.

Pardon me in advance for the upcoming rant, but one can't really enter the female mindspace properly without it - "I want a man who has his shit together! You better have some ambitions, you better have some accomplishments if you want to be with me! I WANT ( I want I want I want I want I wannnnnnt ) a guy who isn't afraid to take what he wants, who is assertive and dominant and aggressive when he needs to be, don't be a fucking doormat, don't be NEEDY ew, although I myself am insecure about my body and need someone to motivate me for the gym and baby me in my DD/lg fetish teehee, oh and for god's sake have some SOCIAL GRACES. Be confident and charming, don't you know how important social graces are? I want a functional man, not a boy, you have to know what you're doing."

Speaking of the monolith, can you find any female profile on r4r which isn't like that in whole or in part, in spirit if not in the explicit and intentionally highlighted priorities? Try it. Now, the average woman looks at the above and thinks to herself "Yass queen SLAY", this is peak performance to her. She considers this to be the most wholesome, deep, reasonable attitude humanly attainable. Thanks to the decadent evil empire and gynocentric atmosphere that we've been under the spell of for a long time now, maybe even you might fail to see the absolute sewage that underlines the gung-ho tirade at first glance.

You know what I see? I seen an application for a sycophantic leech, not a love interest. A total obsession with materialistic, external pursuits and one's position in the societal rat race due to incapability of actually loving anyone for who they are as opposed to what they do, and seeing them as 'success objects' in the same vein that women complain of men only evaluating them as 'sex objects'. I see a total bratty, undeveloped obsession with one of philosophy's biggest vices ( Big surprise, remember the role of women in morality and philosophy? ) - judging a book by it's cover rather than it's content and caring to an extreme length about how someone says something as opposed to what they're saying, which is part and parcel of hindbrain herd behavior. Women are under the impression that their fanatic obsession in that regard is a virtue, and that a good man is one who adapts to it rather than discounts it. It is not, there's a reason why it doesn't figure so prominently in men's dating profiles. And finally, yet another glaring whimsical and infantile female habit which they credit to their superiority - the lack of willingness to give someone any leeway or acceptance whatsoever, to put principle and ideal above ego and feelings, once again, a cornerstone of advanced morality. And once again, something that almost every man instinctively does for women. Put aside the 'muh social skills' ( Or more correctly, women skills, because they're the only ones demanding all the crazy eggshell-stepping ) and 'muh assertiveness', and put themselves in the shoes of the other side, and try to find goodness at the most fundamental level that it really matters, because they have this non-Darwinian sensation and guideline deep down inside of "I should be magnanimous moreso than I am judgemental". Does that ever happen? You can tell from the dating profiles, the answer is obviously not. And that's what makes the female personality what it is.

And this is just one sliver of the grander shit-show. Plenty has been written about the shit-tests even once you're already in a relationship, the double standards, the branch-swinging if you ever fail the shit-test, the mental games, and all for what - the craved female submission state, which let me emphasize, is not 'love' in any sense. The condition which is reached whereupon the female has deemed you to be a successful status/gene leeching target and begins feigning ( Naturally she'll say it isn't feigned, until you stop being Chad to her, and become her "abusive and toxic ex" ) all the sticky affection and sexual favors associated with the 'positive' aspects of female personality, like a colorful and inviting carnivorous plant attracting a fly inside. But any incel which understands the entire process, upon it's carnal pros and philosophical cons, is also one who will never be compatible with a woman, even if he attained physical desirability.

GayLubeOil #sexist reddit.com

A lot of people come here, subscribe, and start participating without giving a serious thought to what the Red Pill metaphor means. We have a lot of cool Red Pill art, banners and symbolism. Yet hardly anyone bothers to figure out what it all means. Why? Because most people are brain dead zombies incapable and highly averse to complex thought. People would rather enact a predesigned narrative (Matrix) then independently respond to life's stimulus.

By using the Matrix metaphor we're claiming that The Red Pill can only function via uncompromising rejection of the Blue Pill. Only with full rejection are you free of Blue Pill influence and capable of truly acting freely. The Matrix film makes this point very clear, which is why we chose to use the metaphor in the first place. There are no half measures here. In other words if you're making posts about acting like an asshole without being an asshole or are concerned with what the vagina person will think of your Red Pill reading, you are a loser and an imbecile. You have failed to comprehend the meaning of Red Pill. You lack the capacity to participate and should fuck off to less intellectually demanding activities like Sports Ball, Game Of Normies and navel gazing.

How does total rejection work in the real world? Let's say for whatever reason you are being shit-tested. Some mindless vagina drone is flapping non-sequiturs out of her labia. What she's saying doesn't logically make sense and isn’t factually representative of what happened. All of the symptoms of a shit test. So before you open your mouth and keep frame, you begin by holding the emphatic belief that all women are illogical emotional child people. 99% of the time they're either hungry, sleepy or need a time out. Nothing a woman says matters by virtue of it being said by a woman. It is with this mindset of absolute chauvinism, that you should enter or refuse to enter the interaction.

Likewise the same methodology can and should be applied when dealing with women and dick-women who aggregate themselves into political movements. Feminism, Egalitarianism, Antifags, namely any ideology not comprised of macho macho men. You wouldn't argue with the Alzheimer's crew at the nursing home. So why are you concerned with the ravings of some freak who doesn't believe in gender, due to a lifelong hormonal imbalance? Occasionally societies like to make crazy people feel important by listening to them. The Greeks did it with the Oracles. Now the West is doing it with Gender Studies dykes. Your Gender Studies professor admires Che and Fidel, however if they were alive today they would gladly execute her for being a maricón. Postmodern art painted with 9mm onto a brick wall. Anyone who admires their executioners is bat shit crazy. Don't argue with them, smile and nod just like the nursing home. Emphatic Rejection.

This brings me to my last point. If you don't emphatically reject the Blue Pill, you are going to have a very bad time. In the operating room of life you are cutting with a dull scalpel. Children, women and the mentally feeble don't understand the world, so they must rely on social cues. They are the stupid kid in class who has no idea what's going on. They might not know anything about calculus, but they can definitely copy off the smart kid. Their understanding of the world is based off of others reaction to it. They are inherently dependent people. They need to test those around them in order to know who to depend on. The more you compromise with their stupidity the more they will believe in their own stupidity and in turn, the more stupidity you will have to deal with. Explaining to a child why she doesn't need the candy bar is just an invitation for more childish bullshit.

The truth is radical, it's not democratic. If the sky is blue and 99% of the population believes it to be yellow, compromising and saying that it's green isn't helping anyone, least of all you. We live in a feminist Cuck-Fag society that promotes a Cuck-Fag dating strategy and a don't offend anyone morality. The Red Pill is an emphatic rejection of both. Going half Cuck-Fag isn't going to help you. There is nothing noble about compromising with idiots. You have to go all the way. That's what the Red Pill is all about.

Pomidor Quixote #sexist dailystormer.name

Mothers Furious After Watching Rape Porn Make a Porn Film to Show to Their Kids

Some mothers will make their own porn films to educate their kids about what sex is really about.

This isn’t even peak degeneracy yet.

Daily Mail:

A group of five mothers are making a porn film they would be happy to show their children after being disgusted by watched X-rated videos online.

One mother was so horrified by online porn that she threw up and one was so traumatised that she quit the whole process.

Sarah, 40, from North Wales, cried while watching rape-based content during the mothers’ research portion of the show.

According to The Mirror, she said: ‘If that was the first time I’d seen anything about sex I’d be petrified. I just thought all of a sudden that I was going to throw up.

‘We need to show kids that there’s something else than this horrible sh*t we see on the internet.

‘If my son treated a woman like that I would kick his a*** to kingdom come.

She added: ‘Porn doesn’t represent normal women, the actors and actresses they use mislead kids. They need to realise it’s not normal.’

The mothers are making their own porn film as part of a Channel 4 TV show called Mums Make Porn.

The three-part series will see a group of mothers create a film with sex in it that they would be happy to let their children watch.

Their mission was to create a porn film which promoted positive attitudes towards sex and realistic expectations of what it involves.

They worked with industry experts and were given all the tools they would need to make the film.

At the end of the series, the mothers reveal their X-rated film to their friends and family, including their children.

That’s right, kids. Mommy will teach you how to fuck women now.

How about not letting kids watch porn instead?

They’ll likely say that that’s just not realistic, but if that’s the case, how can making them watch more porn — even if homemade — be the solution?

Because this isn’t even about porn. It’s about women policing men’s sexuality.

One of the mothers literally said “If my son treated a woman like that I would kick his arse to kingdom come” and that is the perfect synthesis of what all of this depravity is really about; women not approving of how men experience their sexuality.

Old story, really.

Don’t let front-holes tell you how to fuck. You are the one doing the fucking. These bitches do nothing but lay there anyway, so what say should they have in the activity?

If they don’t like it, they can go get themselves fucked and beheaded by niggers.

Besides, women really enjoy when you’re not concerned about their enjoyment of sex. They actually want you to take control over their bodies for your own pleasure, without worrying about their pleasure.

It’s all just a gargantuan shit-test.

Atavistic Autist #conspiracy #quack incels.co

[Serious] Therapists are the capitalist equivalents of KGB informants

As social alienation has increased due to the dislocations wrought by liberal-capitalism, people have naturally become less capable of resolving disputes between themselves, and so have outsourced conflict resolutions to police officers and therapists and the like.

It is no coincidence that a therapist will not hesitate to call the police on you if you say too much, and betray your trust, because both professions are inherently rooted in the contradictions of a low trust society. Both a police officer and a therapist are ultimately working against you, and see you as something to be managed rather than made satisfied.

A therapist is the capitalist equivalent of a KGB spy in the Soviet Union pretending to be your friend, but who is actually just there to inform on any seditious words of yours, while you pay him to do so (whether through the vector of the state or the sham of paying for "mental health treatment").

Except there's much less pretense with a therapist, and at least a KGB spy did not personally force you to remunerate him as he shit-tested your faith in the prevailing system of power.

CH & Jack Ragnar #sexist heartiste.wordpress.com

COTW winner Jack Ragnar does a 180 on cuckventional wisdom and as a result grazes a deep and abiding truth about the sexes.

" I had a conversation about flirting with my sister. This came up. Women at their core want to find out who the better man is. They would by default go with the winner of “you and him fight”. However men are not all on board with this idea. Such games are anti-civilization, and the costs are high. If men refuse, and choose to work out their differences in a more civilized and subtle way, women have to gain the information about men in a more covert fashion. So we get shit-tests, status seeking, etc.

Women are literally anti-civilizational. Their instincts if left unchecked (ala modern women), will bring out the most violent aspects of men. Men despite their capability for violence and destruction are not on average destructive. Women, if left to their devices would have us living in grass huts."

The white kight/cuck aphorism they love to cling to is that women are the civilizers of men, by dint of being the gatekeepers to sex and therefore having the leverage to demand men behave themselves.

But what if the civilizing force runs the other way? Any man who has experience with women has seen that the fair sex can entertain malice and destructiveness the equal of any man, but without the sensationalist physical violence that grabs headlines and puts the spotlight on male wickedness. There’s a better case to make that men are the sex with the drive to civilize, and that women, constrained as their sex is by the hypergamous need to identify the strongest man in the tribe, exert de-civilizing forces on the sexual market that if left unregulated can and do lead to cultural collapse.

Jack is onto something yuge, and we here at CH have toyed with the same idea of unrestricted female sexuality as a herald of national decline. The entire story may be more nuanced than this, but it’s a necessary and useful widening of the discourse to at least begin to cast suspicion on the shibboleth that women civilize men and not the other way around. When all is said and done, CH will have pushed open the Ovaton Window so wide the sunlight will scorch dying feminist wombs from Berkeley to Bonn.

128730 #sexist #wingnut #pedo reddit.com

[OP of "Allowing men to marry younger women would fix things?"]

So NRx is about returning social mores to a state that would be more in line with what humans have done historically, right? Well, historically, even in the Western states that most NRx models for an ideal government are based on, men could marry girls way younger than 18. Why was this done? Why was it changed in recent times?

I think the change in that custom was brought about intentionally (as intentionally as anything in the Cathedral is done; I'm not implying that there was an evil cabal of fat lesbian feminists that unilaterally succeeded in taking women away from men, although the desire definitely does exist on their part) , as a means of "undermining patriarchy" (aka shit-testing society). My reasoning is as follows:

A big part of Cathedral dogma is that women need to be educated in order to become strawng and independent and better than men, because Equality. The only way women could begin to do that is if men stopped marrying them as virgins at 13 and forcing them to have and raise children. So my idea is that pedophilia actually helps patriarchy, in that women are more likely to be married, having children, only having sex with one guy, not getting divorced etc, if all they know is powerful older man dick and authority. Changing the laws and customs regarding "pedophilia" was a big step toward current clown world nuttery.

So....Islam is right on women? Maybe the part about marrying women off early is right. I don't know about the polygamy part though. Seems like a good way to have hordes of angry horny men around is to make it so that only a few men have access to most of the women; and in fact this extreme sexual deprivation and the resultant frustration is what fuels Jihadism.

I don't know about the bugging 9 year olds part either. I think prepubescence is too early to get started on explicitly sexual domination of women. Little boy buggery and diddling is totally out of the question.

I know this isn't an original thought in NRx circles, but I think its worth bringing up here on Plebbit where tons of newbs and others may see it.

EDIT: By pedophilia I mean anything that would be classed as statutory rape in the US. Sorry I didn't clarify that.

laidnyc #sexist web.archive.org

I'LL LOVE YOU FOREVER UNTIL YOU TURN 30

Your Seed is Gold

Sex is too easy.

Work out, put on nice clothes, talk to girl, tease her, tell her cool things about me, pretend to be interested in her, fuck her.

See?

Too fucking easy.

It’s stupid.

I don’t give a shit about sex. Any broad can spread her legs.

You know what I do care about? Holding girls to a higher standard.

Why? Because my seed is liquid fucking gold and I don’t give it out like its god damn tap water.

See girls, your pussy is powerless to me. What else you got?

You slip on a tight skirt and throw on some makeup and flaunt those nice tits and think your job is done. You shit-test me all the way into the bedroom expecting me to give you amused mastery and show you my status and give you attention and ignore you just right all at the same time, and then you’ll give me sex.

But why should I give you my valuable time and let you revel in my charisma?

Sex, is that the big deal? I’m supposed to feel so grateful that you blessed me with that magical unicorn pussy of yours?

I got news for you girls. For a guy with any clue, finding sex is as easy as finding a pizzeria in New York, and like pizza in New York, its all pretty fucking good.

Your brand ‘aint that special.

Sex is everywhere and anywhere I want it, I don’t give a shit about yours.

It takes more than a nice curve of the ass or a bat of the eyelashes to earn my seed.

My salty essence and genetic code is a gift from my father, and his father, and his father, and on it goes. Its the sticky genetic code of self-sufficient men who have protected and provided for family, women and children. Its the haplogroup of men who built civilization. I have the genetic lineage of warriors, business owners, firefighters, blacksmiths, farmers, herders, poets, politicians, soldiers, artists and even chefs. Hard jobs that help build the world, thinking jobs that help build a culture, they’ve all been done by men in my bloodline. My ceiling for accomplishment is limitless.

I’m not some average guy begging to give my seed away. My seed is valuable and I know it.

Men of lesser genetics may be able to afford spraying their seed anywhere; I allow myself no such atrocities.

My sperm could populate an entire society of strong good looking altruistic people and any girl who takes it in would be lucky to be a vessel towards that new world.

But for that I demand a high price.

Whether or not our sex is intended to end in pregnancy makes no difference. Just the sheer fact that it could makes me demand the same high price.

You better have enviable genetics yourself- I don’t breed with inferior stock. Beauty is the minimum and you better know how important that is. Long hair grown to impress me, healthy diet and exercise to maintain your figure and viability of your eggs.

But the beauty that draws the stares, stutters and drools of lesser men won’t capture my attention for more than a millisecond. I am inundated with a surplus of beauty in my daily pursuits, I can assure you that yours ‘aint that special. You probably look like shit first thing in the morning or on the first day of your period.

I expect impeccable hygiene and classy style. A body tainted by tattoos and excessive piercings and slutty clothing signals you are available for sex to lesser men than myself. I’ll have none of that.

I demand a low N count to show you value your body and sex, and the seed I am about to give you will be appreciated on the level it deserves. A low N count shows both intelligence and confidence as you are smart enough not to give your body to charlatans and scoundrels, and confident enough to wait for the high value man you know you deserve.

I expect manners and grace. No swearing, drunkenness, burping, sarcasm or anything else unbecoming of a lady. I spend a lot of time working with and competing against men in my daily life, the last thing I need is the company of a woman who acts like the men I must compete with. You exist to soothe, not to grate.

A year from now I will be richer and fitter and more socially respected in the Kingdom, but your beauty will have faded a notch. I demand that you treat me with the humility and respect that this biological reality dictates.

Finally, there is nothing I despise more than a woman who shows any disgust for my jizz.

It is the Royal Essence and you better enjoy every last drop.
If it lands on your face, chest or back, consider it raindrops from heaven, a rope of Holy Yogurt.
If you are lucky enough to get it in your mouth, savor it like the nourishing nectar of the Gods.
If I shoot it inside you consider it the greatest compliment of all. You will feel an immediate buzz.
My jizz is to women what Walter White’s pure blue meth is to junkies.
You’ll take my seed, sweetly tell me “thank you sir” and buzz with happy feminine energy for the next day while you iron my fine shirts and indulge in memories of me.

I’ll settle for nothing less.

Some girls don’t want to respect a man that much. They have been poisoned by feminism or never had a strong male figure to look up to growing up or they have already taken far too high a volume of cock to revere their next one. I have no use for those girls. Even a one-night stand with them is worthless beyond the ten-second orgasm, itself not worth the time spent to get it. Leave them for the men who have a low enough opinion of themselves to not demand such respect.

For guys, I don’t give a shit how many girls you’ve fucked just like I don’t give a shit how many pizzerias you’ve eaten at. A man is measured more by the pizzeria’s he refuses to eat at, the prices he refuses to pay for average pizza, if you know what I mean.

Remember, you set the price of your seed.

Mine is fucking gold.

What’s yours?

Silverandgold #sexist #psycho incels.co

[Serious] Honestly, rape isn’t that bad

Even when I was younger and more of a normal man, not a sexually frustrated nihilistic misanthrope, I didn’t think rape was that bad. I thought it was wrong, like stealing a loaf of bread or maybe an expensive TV at worst, but I never thought it was a crime worthy of jail time. I never thought it was a crime that was unforgivable. I always thought it was ridiculous when rapists got lumped in with murderers and child molesters. Rape is really not that serious. Women just don’t like it because the men are ugly. If I was raped by an ugly woman, I would take it as a compliment. Now if she was really fat, elderly, and had smelly genitals that she forced me under gunpoint to lick, I would be mad. I would probably vomit. But I wouldn’t be traumatized for life or believe that the woman deserves to be in prison for 10 years. A hefty fine would be enough. Women who get raped are no virgins. women who get raped have sex with at least 10 men by age 20 so how is it traumatic to take just one more penis? It’s not. Women have too much time on their hands to dwell on things and become neurotic about unimportant situations. If women were in a tribe, they would get raped all the time and wouldn’t even care anymore after one point because they would have more important things to worry about like surviving in the harsh environment. By the way, I don’t want to rape anyone. It wouldn’t turn me on to be with someone who is repulsed by me. I Would never rape someone even if I could get away with it. I’m just thinking out loud. Rape isn’t that bad. By the way, I know a woman who got raped by a black man when she was a teenager and she turned out okay. She is a happy wife and mom now of 3 kids.

ItsNotADream #sexist incels.co

RE: [JFL] Slavcels posing with their noodle wives

Us, Serbian guys with our Indonesian wives in Serbia

Lifefuel for a slav like me. But I also feel bad for the rice men in indonesia tbh

A comment on r*ddit

"now where is our serbian wives in Indonesia"

:feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha: :feelsrope:

They most be really desperate, but I don't get the guy in the left, he looks like a chadlite

Because slav foids treat their men like shit. He probably just wanted someone who treated him well

I always thought that slavic women are more traditional, I guess that my slavic mother isn't that different after all since she treats my father like shit
also every modern woman is like that regardless of ethnicity

Various Incels #fundie incels.co

(EcuntR)
Would you support a facist government if it meant a gf was guranteed to you?

Imagine if a right wing government was gathering support for the re-introduction of old values such as slut shaming and women going back to the kitchen. Would you support it?

(Weeb25)
i would even if they didnt provide me gf

(TrueForcedIncel)
Sure why not, better then what we got now shit. Fuck the people anyway.

(LiterallyASoyboy)
Yes, as it would get me a gf. It's not as if people aren't currently breeding like rabbits anyway, might as well ensure my personal contentment. Almost anything would be better than the current system.

(HighTGymcel)
yes bro as long as they wont kill me

(ordinaryotaku)
Yes, even though I'm against fascism.

(RageAgainstTDL)
Only if she was superprime and very hot. I have come to think women are low value in general and I wouldn't want one unless she was top notch or alternatively extremely subservient.

(Michael15651)
Yes, without hesitation.

(South'Merican)
Yup, even without a gf. Even more if is based in conservative ideals like arranged marriage.

(SlayaCaleb88)
If its like the 3rd reich hell yeah I would.

(Cuyen)
Lmao I would support it even if it dont guarante me anything :feelshaha:

(Insomniac)
I would support a fascist government regardless.

(TheRealChincel)
No, having a gf is too :soy: in today’s world.

(FinnCel)
Hell yeah!
I don't give a shit even if it made our standard of living worse as long as we get decent lives. We'd be happier in general than we are now

(BlackPincel)
I wold support a fascist government even if it didn't give me gf, as long as it doesn't make me unemployed, makes my hellhole safer getting rid of violent criminals, wasn't corrupt, and have a stable capitalist economy.


And the dictator would have to be Red/Blackpilled as well and not a populist.

A1M2E21 #sexist reddit.com

It is possible to be able to change how masculine you are!

Jesus christ these morons prove the heightpill every time they talk. How the fuck you suppose a 5’5 manlet would make himself look masculine? If he manages to get jacked then he’s going to look funky and be seen as an overcompensating asshole. I know this masculinity shit is mega cope for chubby niggas like him but damn it pisses me off. These boomers tell themselves its masculinity that attracts women so that they can still put their “pull yourself by the bootstraps bucko” mentality to work. Instead of just bluntly saying its good looks, since good looks didnt require ((hard work)), they have to say its “muh masculinity”. FFS man. Im like amazed at how stupid people are. I never realized how alone I really am in this world until I browsed r/incels and here. Literally everyone deludes themselves into believing this shit. WHY?

Shinjicel #elitist #dunning-kruger incels.co

[Blackpill] incels have a more "interesting" personality than any other group of people.

I never got this, with incels, you always get gas-lit by foids, normies and chads that its our "personalities' that do not get us laid yet the threads here especially that quote thread from numerous great minds through history is 90% more interesting than talking about some retarded normie tier drama behind other normies backs and then spreading those rumors round the friend group or sitting at home smoking weed all day and playing smash bros or some other gay shit with your friends for the 90th time. Women and chads have even less of an interesting "personality", since all they do is think about sex or in women's cases leveraging sex for material possessions or for ego purposes.

I feel like if anything most of these degenerate fucks are afraid of incels and their line of thinking, not because of what we claim but because of how multi-dimensional you as a person have to be to adapt in a looks based world. You as a person are going to have to do a lot more to stand out as your looks will always be holding you back, whether it be getting a better paying job to in more severe cases not being picked on while being in public. As meritocracy and the idea of pulling yourself by your bootstraps gets obfuscated by the ruling class, this issue in particular will be the next frontier I feel like incels will have to fight knowing full well the futilely of it all in the face of AA becoming a bigger and bigger deal.

With all that said, I genuinely want to know, how retarded normie tier thinking has to be to even begin to say that its an incel's personality that is the problem when if anything the hobbies, past-times,career and friends an incel decides to associate themselves especially from my experience is much more interesting than normie tier groups of friends. Not to mention its much more liberating not having to deal with the overly offended crowd in general.

warbiitch #fundie warbiitch.tumblr.com

You wanna know why I don’t give a fuck about that Keaton kid ? Because so many Black and Brown babies get fuckin bullied and beaten down and jumped every fuckin day but nobody cares. But let a racist little white boy or girl start crying and everyone rushes to save them and support their fucking family.

66, 000 Black girls went missin this year and nobody who cried All Lives Matter pulled themselves up by their bootstraps to fucking help not one fucking but. It was Black people who stepped up to help find the girls. It was Black people who stepped up to help with flint. And It was Black women who saved the Whites from Roy Moore in Ala-motherfucking-bama

It’s 2017 and White people are fucking pathetic. White people prove themselves everyday to be pathetic , ridiculous, whining, BITCHING, unnecessary, and asinine fucking mutated creatures. Appointing Uncle Toms, Racists, Neo Nazis, Transphobes, and pedophiles and rapists as leaders. And now this little racist White boy starts crying on social media and people threw their fucking money away to him and his racist fucking family

And you wanna know the trip part about the whole fucking thing? That little cunt wasn’t even bullying any fucking body. He was calling a bunch of Black kids niggers and got mad when the kids called him out on his shit.

But these motherfuckers really threw their money away to him when all that money could have went towards more important things.

Let me tell ya, it is 2017. I am Black, I am a Cisgender Woman, I am Angry, I am Hateful, Cruel and Mean and Ruthless and Vulgar and most of all Unapologetic.

Fuck that little fucking Keaton turd and his entire fucking Racist family. Fuck the people who gave him money. Fuck the people who defend him just cuz he’s a kid. Fuck White people in general this year all the way into the next. I’m tired and I’m sick.

Gross. I’m gonna fuckin vomit.

{gif of a vomiting woman redacted because Yesman is a sissy}

Gymcelled #sexist incels.co

[Blackpill] The top 10% of antisocial men are responsible for 27% of pregnancies and 62% of violent assaults against women

This study will show us what kind of personality men need to have the most success with women

"LCP" stands for Life-course-persistent, they are the men who have been antisocial all their life ever since they were a kid. They have the WORST PERSONALITY since FOREVER and NEVER IMPROVE. They are the 10 percentile when it comes to antisocial behavior. The worst of the worst.

Surprise surprise, these men are extremely successful with women despite their personality, they are responsible for 27% of pregnancies despite making up 10% of the population. They are responsible for 62% of convictions for violence against women and are overrepresented when it comes to unemployment and most crimes.

"the childhood-onset delinquents were the most elevated on psychopathic personality traits, mental-health problems, substance dependence, numbers of children, financial problems, work problems, and drug-related and violent crime, including violence against women and children"

So this is the amazing personality women want. Unemployed drug addicts who pummel women, commit various crimes and don't try to better their personalities are slaying the most

image

You'll also notice the other group "AL" which stands for adolescence limited. These are men who grow out of their antisocial phase. You'll notice that they're also overrepresented when it comes to unemployement, crimes, violence against women AND OF COURSE PREGNANCIES.

"The adolescent-onset delinquents at 26 years were less extreme but elevated on impulsive personality traits, mental-health problems, substance dependence, financial problems, and property offenses"

image

Males on the life-course-persistent and adolescence-limited antisocial pathways: Follow-up at age 26 years

Women are bluepilled on the streets but blackpilled in the sheets

Not sure I'd call them blackpilled in any way considering they're convinced that they're choosing the men with the best personalities.

Personality matters :feelskek:

If it does it seems to be 100% the opposite of what we're told every day :feelshaha:

Darktriadpill single-handedly destroys mainstream narratives about morality and being a 'nice guy'.

It's infuriating though, all our life we're accused of being horrible people, the gaslighting never stops. And then you realize that the worst kind of people get EVERYTHING in life while you're blamed for it

Women love narcissistic Chads who LARP as charismatic but are really petulant and aggressive children.

That's what I've noticed irl. Thug chads, drug addict chads, and just in general very impulsive chads like to think they're some sort of complex and unique leading figure going against societal rule.

Holy shit - so the group who commit violence against women at a rate of 18x the non-violent men are 4x more likely to be fathers? In effect, saying that violence has a positive impact factor of 72!!!

What the fuck...

I wouldn't extrapolate things like that because we all know looks matter the most. The point is just that it looks like the worst type of men are the most successful. Which goes completely against the whole "improve your personality bro" and "don't be a dick bro"

MMDT #sexist reddit.com

Why are "progressives" so deterministic when it comes to poverty, , yet for incels they suddenly have a "pull up your bootstraps and stop making excuses" mentality?

It just blows my mind. They understand that for poverty, simply being born poor is a strict disadvantage. They understand it's not always a clear cut discrimination, but a long series of subtle things that happen all throughout life.

They understand that some poor people making it out does not negate the experiences of the others, and does not mean we should expect all poor to make it out.

They understand that a person born rich can essentially make constant terrible life decisions and still come out ok, whereas a poor person has to play the game perfectly just to fare moderately well.

Yet suddenly, when it comes to looks, despite lookism being well documented and observed, their so called progressivism goes flying out the window and they become Ben Shapiro.

Can you IMAGINE if the shit they said about looks was transferred over to wealth?

"Poor people need to stop making excuses and realise the problem is their fault"

"Being born poor isn't even that big a deal. My friend was born poor and now he's rich"

"Employers can sense your negative attitude, that's why they won't hire you"

"You aren't entitled to money. Companies are not objects where you put job applications in and money falls out"

"I'm a 36 and I've been homeless all my life, but I don't let it get me down :)."

"Poor people are a danger to society. How much crime is commited by poor people? They need to be put on a government watch list"

"If they hate capitalism so much why do they even want a job?"

"Having money won't make you happy. If you think being trapped in poverty is the cause of your problems then you're wrong"

"Stop focusing so much on poverty. If you go around talking about things like gini coefficients people will think you're weird. And you wonder why you can't get money."

It's simply astounding the hypocrisy.

Edit: and now inceltears have a thread on this. So far all responses are not even worth the bandwidth used to post them. But I remain hopeful that just one person can say something worthwhile.

Visceral #fundie dailykos.com

I'm a progressive, but also a pessimist and a misanthrope. My support for progressive policies is motivated by a firm belief that most people are crazy, evil, or just plain stupid and cannot be left to their own devices without ultimately screwing themselves and/or others. I don't see any contradiction between being a progressive and a control freak because "freedom" to me means freedom for them, not us ... since we have well-developed internal restraints, so while reducing external restraints wouldn't change our behaviors, it would change the behaviors of the people that we are logically most interested in controlling.

The irony is that while mental illness is regarded as grounds for leniency, I could argue that diminished faculties means they're more likely to require strong external controls and simple, powerful associations between undesirable behaviors and negative consequences. If only we really could "throw away" all the clinical psychopaths (as defined by patterns of behavior and/or measurable physical differences in brain structure): throw every banker, MBA, and Republican politician in jail.

Angela Helm #racist thegrapevine.theroot.com

Cry Me a River of White Tears, White South African Colonizers

Recently, Lauren Southern, Tomi Lahren’s Canadian sister in the white supremacist struggle, highlighted the perilous plight of white South Africans, who—gasp—are being discriminated against ... this, in the very country known throughout the world for its racial tolerance!

In a seven-minute documentary, this tone-deaf “alt-right” propagandist ruminates on the travails of white South Africans who are “going through an intense crisis” (complete with sad music in the background) in the very same country where their people colonized native South Africans into a brutal racial caste system beginning in the 1940s. Southern says that these whites are allegedly being displaced (all 60 of them, in this case) and have to live in “white settlement camps” on the outskirts of town because the nasty African National Congress-led government won’t help them.

Whites in South Africa are being denied jobs and will soon have their land taken away without compensation,” writes Becky Boer Southern. “As a result, more and more people are finding themselves living on handouts in white squatter camps because they are routinely denied help from anywhere else.”

She then “exposes” these terrible conditions—whites living in one-room “shacks” with no electricity or water—none of which South Africa has ever, ever seen. Oh, except in the infamous shantytowns where tens of thousands of black South Africans were forced to live in conditions that would make that “shack” look like the fucking Ritz.

But the pièce de résistance comes when Southern interviews a white South African woman who says she can’t walk around her neighborhood at night because the blacks will “rape you, beat you up.” She says her children are being teased by black children “in their own language,” which she tearfully cannot understand. So much so that she actually wants to leave the country. “We are human beings just like them, just the color and the language is different.”

You don’t say.

The crazier part is how many South Africans and white Europeans were in shrill agony saying that what is happening to these deserving whites is the worst thing since Syrians bombed their own people with sarin gas (OK—they didn’t say that, but they did say they that should be “relocated.”)

{snip}

The question is, have these people no sense of history, context or irony? Maybe white poverty is increasing because they actually have to compete with blacks for jobs. Maybe they don’t work hard enough. Maybe they’re just dumb and lazy. I don’t know.

What’s really glaring is the sense of entitlement that white Americans and white South Africans both have. Hmm. Let’s see. What do they have in common? General wealth? Check. Some of the world’s highest rates of incarceration and HIV? Yup (except this affects only the blacks in those countries). What else? Oh yes, a once-legal but still-pervasive racial caste system, which gifts and curses whites into thinking that they are so much of a god that the world owes them something.

Here’s an idea for these poor, sad, white South Africans: Get a job. Work harder. Do better. Don’t rely on the government so much. Stop having kids. Pull yourself up by your bootstraps. Go back to your own country.

The gall of these people is incredible. Truly ah-mazing.

David Yeagley #racist smashculturalmarxism.com

“Fifty years from now, there won’t even be any white people!” said my pathological Middle Eastern neighbor. He knew I was an American Indian, and he expected me to dance in his vision. I didn’t. I found his attitude, and that of his angry black wife, repulsive. I don’t
appreciate being presumed upon or being dictated to in any matter, especially in the matter of race. Nobody tells this Indian how to think. I’m free to like and dislike whomever I please, for whatever reasons I choose.

My two neighbors were racists, obviously. And they were making me a victim of their racism. Because I was non-white, they presumed I was a natural partner in their resentment and animosity toward the white race. I was judged by the color of my skin, so to speak.

This all happened many years ago, but, I never forgot it. Today, I see truth in the words of my Middle Eastern neighbor. White women are leaping in bed with black men, or other darkies of the world, and popping out strange-looking children. Generally speaking, the male in these incidents could not care less about the children. It’s all about sexual aggression against the white race. They’re happy to conquer for the moment, and to create ghastly, permanent consequences. Marriage and family have nothing to do with these misanthropes, nor the lusus naturae they create.

Sematrix #fundie reddit.com

Yep. Socialism only works in ethnically homogenous countries, and European socialism really amounts to people who see themselves as an extended family working for the common interest and good under nationalist circumstances.
Without "kinship," socialism turns into Soviet-style Communism that has to be enforced at the point of a gun and only serves a party oligarchy.

In the case of the massive and growing American welfare state, that "socialism" amounts to a massive, Big Brother debt and dependency-generating Ponzi scheme sold by international bankers and their pimps and whores. (Think of Jewish huckster Bernie Maddoff's racket, only on a militaristic and geopolitical level.) And it requires the constant hijacking of other nations and massive in-migrations to keep it propped up, and eventually and inevitably a world war to wipe all of the debt clean by fiat of total chaos and destruction -- which explains the relentless Jewish and liberal-neocon Mideast war agenda, and why they're trying for world War with Islam, Russia and China -- even as they bring in droves of Muslims, who are now targeting average Americans in a perfect distraction and opportunity for a Big Brother clampdown.

This is why, far from "humanitarians" and "progressives" that the welfare state debt pimps and Big Brother hucksters advertise themselves to be, they're actually the most murderous and misanthropic rats walking the earth.

The Jewish banker and extended Zionist crime family role in all of this also goes a long way toward explaining the tenacity of what these rat-fascist psychopaths and their whores call "anti-Semitism."

Bernard McGuirk #fundie towleroad.com

The war on Christmas is very, very real, and if you ask me, in addition to some grouchy misanthropic heathen atheists it has to do - at the root of it - with two things - abortion and the gay rights agenda, because Christianity is against those things. It's subtle but that's why it's so pronounced in recent years.

Eivind Berge #sexist eivindberge.blogspot.com

Reasons why people believe in the female sex offender charade

Whatever their reasons, people do not believe that women can sexually abuse because it is true. As I have resoundingly pointed out, it is logically impossible, given the core beliefs and values that I hold, for women to sexually abuse boys. In this post I will examine possible reason for why people believe, or say they believe that women can be sexual abusers despite the obvious falsehood of this proposition.

- Virtue signaling. Now that it is established as politically correct to believe in female-perpetrated sexual abuse, that in itself will make a lot of people say it just because it increases their status. It is a classic case of the emperor's new clothes -- social status counts more than perceptions and one tends to say what powerful people want to hear.

- It follows from other strongly held beliefs. I am thinking of feminists who posit that the sexes are equal, which is how we got into this mess. Once it is axiomatic to you that there cannot be any sex differences, women must be able to do everything men can no matter how absurd, and so female sexual acts must be equivalent to male abuse despite no one ever feeling it. This is similar to how some physicists feel compelled to believe in the multiverse. Neither phenomenon can ever be observed, but one must believe in it for the sake of consistency.

- Projection. Women project their own sexual feelings (or lack of them) onto males, honestly not realizing how different we are. Notice that women are by far the most vociferous proponents of the female sex offender charade, as well as inventing it, and we often hear that "abuse" was accused only because a boy's mother egged him on. Men used to keep such lunacy in check, and it can thus be seen as a nasty side effect of giving women too much political power.

- Their paycheck depends on it. Is a policeman, prosecutor, judge, school administrator, therapist or journalist going to go with his instincts, which if expressed will get him instantly fired, or what brings home the bacon and furthers his career? The choice is dishonorable, but understandable. These figures will almost always follow the profits. The same goes for accusers and their families who stand to gain from suing the school etc., in which case greed is the proper name of the sin.

- Thoughtlessness and going with the flow. I know I am special because I have thought and read extensively about sexual abuse, and there are doubtless people who give it little thought. I am sure I hold irrational beliefs on some other subjects myself, perhaps some of them equally ridiculous as the assertion that women can sexually abuse boys. But I wouldn't know, because I don't examine these views critically, and there isn't enough time in anybody's life to think critically and research the facts about everything. This is probably the most excusable excuse, but it can't remain excusable for long if you are made to think about the topic.

- Socially acceptable misogyny. To label a woman as "sex offender" is to declare open season for any hate anyone wishes to heap on her, and this being the sole remaining politically correct way to hate women, naturally it will attract misogynists. This hate is so strong in some men that they will pathetically deny their own sexual nature as boys in favor of claiming abuse, and this applies to accusers as well as bystanders. Thus you have grown men spouting the lie that they didn't want to have sex with their female teachers in school, or that they were "abused" if they did. I am willing to accept that their hate is stronger than their sex drive, but they were most assuredly not abused, because that would require a consensus reality in which I could intuitively partake and not just a false and self-serving belief. This doesn't even have to be misogyny, but the same kind of misanthropic malice that causes a person to jump on the bandwagon and participate in any old witch-hunt or lynching. Vigilante pedophile hunters are cut from this cloth.

Insofar as people believe in the myth that women can be sexual abusers, how do they justify it to themselves?

- The aversive experience delusion. We all know that boys want sex, but somehow, for the purposes of expressing an opinion on female "abusers," this knowledge is blocked out and replaced with the message promulgated by the theatrics of feminist abuse hysteria. They may be laboring under the delusion that "children" are asexual, never mind their own memory to the contrary. And the "teacher or similar status = abusive power differential" myth is a powerful destroyer of common sense. All it takes is a mumbo-jumbo explanation like that and a lot of people's minds go blank and ready to be filled with whatever authority tells them. This is similar to how the "rape is about power rather than sex" canard got established. It sounds like a sophisticated thing to say, so having heard it all his life from intelligent-sounding people, the man in the street will parrot it even though it bears zero resemblance to how he feels his own sexuality works.

- The more pseudo-sophisticated explanations. Some true believers will admit that boys go through all the motions and feelings of wanting and enjoying sex, but then all this is somehow made irrelevant by a metaphysical layer that still makes it abuse. Or it is believed that some kind of "trauma" will surface later. Of course this is gibberish unless you go out of your way to brainwash boys into thinking they have been abused -- which is to say actually abusing them -- but it is an explanation for how these dimwitted minds work.

- Misguided equality or an MRA tactic. Some men understand that the female sex offender charade is completely or mostly nonsense, but they want to punish these women anyway just to be "equal" or get even or convince women that the hateful sex laws were a bad idea (which never happens). This belief is common among men who have partially opened their eyes to the abuses of feminism, including a lot of self-styled "MRAs," but of course they are no such thing.

- The irrelevant harm theory. This is also common among "MRAs," who will want to punish women not for sex itself, which they know is harmless, but consequences such as child support. They may have a point, but this should be dealt with by reforming child support laws rather than pretending that women can rape or sexually abuse boys. Apparently they lack the imagination to do anything but go along with the feminists on 99% of issues.

If you look at the comment section below any news article about supposed female sexual abusers, wherever comments are unmoderated, it is always teeming with men who express disbelief that it can be abuse or say they wish they had been so lucky themselves. So this is one issue where male sexualists are decidedly not alone. I would say we represent the true majority, but those who promote the female sex offender charade wield disproportionate power, enough to make it the law of the land for now. This is a horribly wrong situation that we need to change, gentlemen. As male sexualist activists we must never forget to stand up for women accused of sexual abuse as well, because we know this charade is every bit as absurd and odious as any historical witch-hunt and even more troubling than the hateful persecution we face ourselves.

Bristol Palin #fundie patheos.com

If you aren’t paying attention to Texas politics right now, join the crowd. But the Democrat running for governor is just so awful you have to pay attention. Wendy Davis rose to the top of everyone’s minds because her story was so compelling. This CNN headline summed it up:

CNN: Wendy Davis: From Teen Mom to Harvard Law to Famous Filibuster

Turns out, she lied about much of her “pulling herself up by her own bootstraps” story. Actually, she found a man to marry her, pay her way through college, and then through Harvard Law School. The day after he paid the last bill, she left him. By the way, she left her kids too. She said, “it’s not a good time for me right now” to be a parent.

Is everyone paying attention? This woman is the hero of the Left? A woman whose ambition and ego were so big she couldn’t have both a career and kids at the same time.

Gosh, children are sooo inconvenient, huh? I’m glad my mother didn’t put motherhood on the shelf when she was elected to City Council, then became our mayor, then Governor. Oh sorry – I mentioned my mother… Have you liberals gone into a tail spin of hate already? Did I lose you?

I know you would rather think about Wendy Davis, so let’s get back to her. She’s more your type of woman. She left her kid, husband, made it into a false “made-for-tv-movie-type-tale” and then demanded that Texans have the right to kill babies. That’s the woman you libs can really get behind!

Let me be clear. I think it’d be so nice to have a husband take care of me, and my son, so I could attend school. (Any school — let alone, Harvard!)

But the way Wendy Davis did it – by getting married and leaving him as soon as the ink dried on his last check – is downright pathetic.

Plus, it perfectly shows that – no matter what they say – feminism is a farce. If you truly believe in strong, independent women, you’d be a conservative.

W. F. Price #fundie the-spearhead.com

As Roissy has pointed out, when women are faced with a smaller selection of viable mates, they tend to respond by ramping up their promiscuity and hypergamy to new heights. Today, on college campuses, there are far fewer men than women, and the desirable males – those with the looks and social skills – represent an even smaller proportion of the student body. At the top of the heap are athletes, who need do nothing more than leave their bedroom doors unlocked to get laid.

For these few, privileged men college is like a giant harem full of competing concubines. For the concubines, well, it must be pretty stressful and demoralizing.

This is really the key to the happiness gap between men and women. Women have consistently reported a decline in happiness since the 1960s, when their status began to rise and eclipse men’s. Elevating women and suppressing men may have seemed like the perfect recipe for female happiness for the feminists, but they failed to take into account what the real effect would be on women, who are fundamentally driven by matters of the heart. Or perhaps they didn’t care, because the entire project was about personal and emotional gain for a few, strange, power-hungry women.

...

If women are happier when surrounded by higher status men, the obvious step to take to increase women’s happiness would be to raise men’s relative status. If men dominated the professions, politics, business and even the office floor, the average woman would be happier. It may seem paradoxical that diminishing women’s relative status could make them happier, but if you consider that status = attractive to females, it makes perfect sense.

The decline in female happiness and rise in mental illness among women is a direct result of the marginalization of the men around them. This is yet another example of the moral and philosophical failure of feminism, which is at its core not only misandric, but misanthropic as well.

ionetranq #sexist theguardian.com

[Re. men putting their arm around women's shoulders]

Trust me, it's an annoying form of territorial pissing.

I, and many others, don't trust you. If you think it is always "territorial pissing" then you're miserable and misanthropic. The people viewing it always as such are the ones doing the territorial pissing - feminists marking other women, and how and what they think, as their territory.

You can't speak for all the men who do it, nor the women who they have their arms around. As is obvious from the comments, plenty of men do it affectionately, and many women like it.

excentrykemuse #fundie reddit.com

I Hate Everyone

I was typing away on my computer, when my mother commented that I hated everyone.

The idea never actually occurred to me before. However, I realized I don't like a single person on this planet. I like my cat, I like my dog, and that's about it. I try to be a good person, do the right thing...

But everyone is just so selfish, self-absorbed, annoying to the extreme. I can't stand to be around people most of the time and listen to their tiny mundane concerns when really -- the whole world is pretty messed up and there are seriously more important problems than x, y, or z. Then it occurred to me. Is there a reason why I'm so nice to people who frankly don't deserve it? Why do I put up with people hugging me and shaking my hand, when really I wish them on the other side of the planet where they can't bother me or anyone else.

I claim to be "zen" without any hatred, but maybe I'm just deluding myself.

I look at history and I see so many places where we could have taken a different path ... and maybe this would better.

So, I guess I'm asking for a bit of advice. Am I misanthropic? Wikipedia is being so vague ...

Or do I need to go searching for some other explanation as to why I feel this way.

"I'm not X, but..." Award

dr. misanthrope #sexist whyihatepeople.com

Modern women are spoiled, here's why

First, let me say I'm not a misogynist, I'm not even a right winger. But, I've come to the conclusion that modern women are spoiled.

There's a reason why. The reason is that the modern world spoils everyone. Modernity is all about endless food, endless entertainment, shopping, photos and videos to feed your ego, everybody spouting crap all the time, everybody feeling important, etc. That's what modern consumer society is all about.

So basically, it spoils everyone, but it spoils women a bit more. Men are competitive by nature, so often men will seek out challenges, or hardship, or things of this nature, even though they live in comfort. Men can never be fully domesticated. Believe me, I think men cause many problems, but most men will always feel a bit uneasy with just the comfortable life.

But with women, that's not the case. Once you feed women's ego, then the whole world becomes about her. All that matters is her, her wants, her desires, etc. And everything else exists to feed it. The one exception is if women have kids, then they turn into mothers and that helps them overcome it to care about her children. But in the background is still the spoiled woman, used to every convenience and comfort, who even thinks of herself as superior to men, and will leave all the real, dirty work to them.

My advice to men: seek out women who aren't spoiled, who are humble and who want to contribute, and want to be good wives and mothers. The spoiled women, the whores, they will ruin you, milk you for all you are worth and then abandon you for the next sucker who falls for their charms.

dr. misanthrope #racist whyihatepeople.com

Black people can do whatever they want, act however they want, say whatever they want, etc., and it's all a celebration of their black culture, or asserting their identity, or being bold, sassy, etc. They are completed protected, and only lose their place at work for the most egregious offenses, and sometimes not even that.

But other groups, especially white people, always have to be on tip toes, walking on egg shells and watching everything they say and do, less they offend someone. Everything is carefully monitored by the PC police, and all of the government and businesses are in on it.

Complete double standard!

I notice this, and I'm not even white! I repeat to everyone who wishes to censor this post - I am not white.

dr. misanthrope #sexist whyihatepeople.com

Where do these whores come from?

As men, obviously we appreciate a few whores here or there. I think a certain amount is sort of natural. After all, there will always be some women willing to use their bodies to make money, etc. And it's not the worst thing in the world to look at women or have sex.

Still, the never ending, infinite number of whores in the world is starting to make me a little ill. There's no end to it. Honestly, do these women want to do anything else with their lives other than take their clothes off and have dirty sex with random men, and film it for the world to see? Can they think of nothing else to do? And don't they want to settle down with one man and become a mother?

Any women want to chime in? If you are not one, who exactly are these women? And do they really enjoy having random men plunge into them over and over?

Again, I just don't understand how there could be so many whores. Millions and millions. It just boggles the mind.

Zamboro #fundie forums.fark.com

[there were an amazing number of dumass comments from _both_ sides in that thread]

Agent C2H60, friendly_neighborhood_misanthrope and mdalli are a good examples of dysgenics in action. They're stupid, useless tumors in the body of humanity. Because of their ignorance they will never accomplish anything noteworthy, and are in fact more likely to hold back everyone that they have power over, sepcifically their children.

This is why they ought to be sterilized.

Michael Hill #racist conservativetimes.org

If the scenario of the South (and the rest of America) being overrun by hordes of non-white immigrants does not appeal to you, then how is this disaster to be averted? By the people who oppose it rising up against their traitorous elite masters and their misanthropic rule. But to do this we must first rid ourselves of the fear of being called "racists" and the other meaningless epithets they use against us. What is really meant by the MC advocates when they peg us as "racists"is that we adhere to ethnocentrism, which is a natural affection for one's own kind. This is both healthy and Biblical. I am not ashamed to say that I prefer my own kind and my own culture. Others can have theirs; I have mine. No group can survive for long if its members do not prefer their own over others.

various TERFs #fundie reddit.com

(Note: TERFs trying to be philosophical now)

(timetaker999)
How can you read the history of female oppression without becoming a misanthrope?

When I read about it, it just makes me hate people and the concept of society even more. When people talk about the good of civilization, it's simply a justification to strip the individual of their rights because of some imaginary concern people have. If they sat there and didn't care when their daughters and wives lost rights it just goes to show how horrific they are. Because laws are the only thing stopping them from going back, it just makes me realize how horrible human nature is.

(nataliebarney)
I hate men.

(krasnoobsk)
wait until stalking genderists will screen it and present it as a proof of this sub being hate sub

(Caducea)
They can all politely go fuck themselves. The only people that care about their fussy, hypocritical, overdramatic stalking are themselves.

(sortofrecovering)
Ditto.

(nataliebarney)
who cares what they think? We really need not to give a shi*t. Saying what we think is liberating and real freedom! I know how women are socially conditioned but my sisters we need to throw this off. I and the rest of you are already an endangered species; being lesbian, being a radical feminist who critiques the patriarchy.

(Non-PC_RadFem)
I second the motion.

(isabeltydoria)
I have to admit, I look at History and vaguely accept it as a weary "of course men dominated women and ruled over them". I don't have a great imagination and it doesn't seem that tangible to me.
But since finding Reddit and becoming active here I'm realising how many men actually hate women right now, see them as sex objects, and genuinely don't understand what women go through. (And I mean, deep, embedded scorn and hatred and loathing.)
It's baffling to me, it's not something I've knowingly experienced in real life but it now makes me wonder what's under the surface of every random guy I see.

(FeistandFurry)
I think men don't see women as full humans. You are a lesser than to them. This has been my experience interacting with males.(excluding a few sissy gay men I had as friends).
That's not even going into the ones that want to harm and mutilate us. Many carry hatred for us and are oblivious to the reality of being a woman. Their world centers around them being hero of their world and women are just props.
Even in benign conversations men are consistently disrespectful.
At this point in my life I focus on women. I have the best conversations with them.

.
.
.

What I try to do is focus on little aspects of people as individuals. I think macro analysis has its uses but it generally hinders affection on a micro scale.
The other day I was eating breakfast and the waitress was having conversation with this older woman and so between bites of toast I became an audience member. I was like there at the diner bar and they were acknowledging me but I wasn't actually saying anything. Like I said, eating toast.
Anyway, the old lady was talking about her garden and the waitress apparently had this tomato garden.
She then went into detail about the bugs and various issues she had with the garden. They both talked about how wonderful the smell of a fresh tomato is. How great it is to plant things. The wonderful feeling of fresh dew and sunshine.
Both were women who on surface are nothing. Just an old lady and a waitress. But inside they have an internal universe.
Sometimes you have to turn off the macro analysis long enough to zero in on the internal universes of each individual.
Misanthropy is a condition too macro for me to exist in for an indefinite amount of time. The way my brain works is it tends to zoom in and out.

(RadFHarva)
Be a misandrist, don't be a misanthrope ;)
After all, who'se been actively oppressing, mutilating, killing and raping women for milleniums? Males. Who created a whole system of oppression and colonized our thoughts? Males. Female collaborationists played a big role because of internalized misogyny, sure, but were they 100% free to act and in their right mind? Of course not. Hate men, love your sisters.

(languidswan)
I swing between those two states a lot. I'm mildly drunk, so this is going to descend into quasi-philosophical rambling that I might feel like deleting tomorrow, but to me, the question that gets raised is what's the distinguishing quality that resulted in most of violence being...well male violence. I mean, radical feminism gives an axiom-sort of response to that, it's socialization kickstarted from biological moment zero of the material reality of sex and the fact men are physically superior to women. Sort of, if women were given the beginning conditions men were given, would they behave that exact same way?
If the answer is yes, then fuck human design altogether honestly, we should all go DIAF because you can never fix that, even if you remove the current "top of the food chain" someone else will come on top and turn just as sociopathic and corrupt by power. If the answer is no, then I believe in gender to some degree, even if my version of believing in gender on the days I do is more along the lines of "men are hardwired for destruction" than "women are naturally submissive". I suppose between the prey and the predator, only the predator needs to want the uneven power dynamic in order for it to happen, the excuses the prey "wanted it" are just that, excuses and propaganda the predator sells you on so you can't call him hypocritical when he asks for empathetic consideration for himself as a "true full human" that deserves it.
In any case, I don't have an answer to that, I don't think anyone currently does with confidence given the things we know. Regardless, I'd perhaps see myself as a mild antinatalist; honestly, I'm not sure the experience of human life is worth all the inherent or less inherent suffering that gets inflicted upon you. I don't see life as a definitely positive thing (my possibly only consistent moral judgement is that suffering is bad); we're mostly evolutionarily wired to dread suicide and culturally we celebrate life (and not just life -- we like existence) so I understand why that viewpoint is wildly unpopular, and I see the obstacles and flaws in it, I'm far from a militant antinatalist or anything. Still it's my emotional impression of the world, I'm far too indifferent to me or all of us (particularly me) just ceasing to exist from one moment to the next, no warning and suffering involved, and particularly, I'm mildly, privately opposed or at least not as sure it's great when more sentient life gets brought into the mix. Whenever anyone rambles on about the "human race" going extinct and how we should do everything to extend our line and create as many sentient beings as possible, I'm like "meh, let it end, as long as no one has to suffer in the process" (btw I watched the movie "What happened to Monday" the other day, if anyone else watched it and was pissed by the ending as me, hit me up to rant).

(RadFHarva)
We'll live on, wether males are there or not. We appeared before them after all, the XY chromosome is just a mutation. If they indeed change their behavior after gender is destroyed and stop being criminals and rapist then fine, we'll have a great society. If they don't, we'll just have to find a way to continue without them (parthenogenesis or articial semen) and we'll just eradicate the Y (with a male specific disease). When no Y exists on the earth, they'll be gone forever. They can't do the same thing with us btw, since they have an X, too, so thet can't get rid of the x. And we'll be free from oppression and ready to create a perfect society. Either way we're going to win on the long run. I don't fully agree with antinatalists, really poor people in war zones or ppls with genetic illnesses should'nt breed, sure, because exposing kids to that is cruel and unethical, but healthy and affluent (or just average) people can give their offspring a great life.

Voluntary Human Extinction Movement #fundie vhemt.org

Q: What is the Voluntary Human Extinction Movement?

VHEMT (pronounced vehement) is a movement not an organization. It’s a movement advanced by people who care about life on planet Earth. We’re not just a bunch of misanthropes and anti-social, Malthusian misfits, taking morbid delight whenever disaster strikes humans. Nothing could be farther from the truth. Voluntary human extinction is the humanitarian alternative to human disasters.

We don’t carry on about how the human race has shown itself to be a greedy, amoral parasite on the once-healthy face of this planet. That type of negativity offers no solution to the inexorable horrors which human activity is causing.

Rather, The Movement presents an encouraging alternative to the callous exploitation and wholesale destruction of Earth’s ecology.

As VHEMT Volunteers know, the hopeful alternative to the extinction of millions of species of plants and animals is the voluntary extinction of one species: Homo sapiens... us.

Each time another one of us decides to not add another one of us to the burgeoning billions already squatting on this ravaged planet, another ray of hope shines through the gloom.

When every human chooses to stop breeding, Earth’s biosphere will be allowed to return to its former glory, and all remaining creatures will be free to live, die, evolve (if they believe in evolution), and will perhaps pass away, as so many of Nature’s “experiments” have done throughout the eons.

It’s going to take all of us going.

Vester Lee Flanagan II #fundie gma.yahoo.com

A man claiming to be Bryce Williams called ABC News over the last few weeks, saying he wanted to pitch a story and wanted to fax information. He never told ABC News what the story was.
.

In the 23-page document faxed to ABC News, the writer says “MY NAME IS BRYCE WILLIAMS” and his legal name is Vester Lee Flanagan II. He writes what triggered today’s carnage was his reaction to the racism of the Charleston church shooting:

“Why did I do it? I put down a deposit for a gun on 6/19/15. The Church shooting in Charleston happened on 6/17/15…”

Sources say Flanagan's firearm was legally purchased from a Virginia gun store.

“What sent me over the top was the church shooting. And my hollow point bullets have the victims’ initials on them."

It is unclear whose initials he is referring to. He continues, “As for Dylann Roof? You (deleted)! You want a race war (deleted)? BRING IT THEN YOU WHITE …(deleted)!!!” He said Jehovah spoke to him, telling him to act.

Later in the manifesto, the writer quotes the Virginia Tech mass killer, Seung Hui Cho, calls him “his boy,” and expresses admiration for the Columbine High School killers. “Also, I was influenced by Seung–Hui Cho. That’s my boy right there. He got NEARLY double the amount that Eric Harris and Dylann Klebold got…just sayin.'"

Sources familiar with the investigation tell ABC News that in his attack, Flanagan used a Glock 19 -- a firearm similar to one that Cho used in his mass attack.

In Flanagan's often rambling letter to authorities, family and friends, he writes of a long list of grievances. In one part of the document, Flanagan calls it a “Suicide Note for Friends and Family."

He says he has been attacked by black men and white females
He talks about how he was attacked for being a gay, black man
He says has suffered racial discrimination, sexual harassment and bullying at work

A source with direct knowledge of his complaints against the station said a pair of tweets sent today and attributed to him accurately reflect previous complaints he lodged against the two people he killed today. These are the two Tweets: “Alison made racist comments,” and, “Adam went to hr on me after working with me one time!!!”

View gallery
.

Nowhere in the document does he make specific threats against anyone from WDBJ.

In his manifesto, he says he encountered "nasty racist things" while working at WDBJ-7 in Roanoke, and that drove him to sue the station. "I marched down to the courthouse and sued WDBJ7 by myself and they settled! HA!"

He continues: "I can remember one day in particular... leaving the courthouse... feeling overwhelmed... confused... even some fear. But by golly I knew I HAD to fight. ... They truly f----d with my life and caused an awful chain of events." He says he even killed his cats in a forest "because of them."

Flanagan says that, "Hell yeah, I made mistakes," noting that he "should not have been so curt" with photographers in Roanoke. "ut you know why I was? The damn news director was a micromanaging tyrant!!"

View gallery
.
And, he writes, "the photogs were out to get me at WDBJ7... one went to HR after only working with me one time... the chief photog told his troops to [record video of] me if they saw be doing something wrong."

Flanagan then suggests that, after leaving WDBJ-7, he was offered a job at a station in Pennsylvania, but WDBJ-7 persuaded the Pennsylvania station to rescind the offer.

"I got to the point, this time around, where I wasn't even looking for a job. I don't need to deal with workplace bullies anymore. THAT is what lawmakers need to focus on," he adds.

“Yes, it will sound like I am angry," he writes in his manifesto. "I am. And I have every right to be. But when I leave this Earth, the only emotion I want to feel is peace....”

“The church shooting was the tipping point…but my anger has been building steadily...I’ve been a human powder keg for a while…just waiting to go BOOM!!!!”

He chronicles the "tough times" he's faced, including some "financial crashes." He says he used to work as a male model but, "I am proud of it" because he "made thousands."

" tried to pull myself up by the bootstraps," but, "The damage was already done and when someone gets to this point, there is nothing that can be said or done to change their sadness to happiness. It does not work that way. Meds? Nah. It's too much."

"And then, after the unthinkable happened in Charleston, THAT WAS IT!!!"

"Yeah I'm all f----- up in the head," he concedes.

Sematrix #racist reddit.com

This is an interesting theological, philosophical and moral debate. A strong argument can be made that anyone who believes in the Talmud's interpretation of the God of the Jews is the most immoral, misanthropic, anti-Christ presence on earth, because the Talmud literally curses Jesus of Nazareth and Gentiles as the bane of the universe and the bane of their God. So in that sense, those who subscribe to the Talmudic "anti-Christ God" and the "anti-human God" or not only not moral, but they're murderously immoral.

Similarly, corrupt and psychotically greedy "liberal" and neocon underlings to the Talmudists and Zionists, and those who subordinate themselves to the wealthy, racist Jewish rackets and Zionist geopolitical war agenda, are subordinating themselves to the inhuman anti-Christ. How "Godly" is that? It's clear that from any coherent Christian or humanist theological perspective, the anti-Christ and its diabolical minions need to go down.

But for people who worship the Talmudists and their filthy lucre (or their fork tongued promises of filthy lucre), all of Christendom and all of humanity other than the "Chosen-Elect" needs to go down. Decisions, decisions. One can almost hear the calculations whirling in the greedy little minds of so many critters. Which group should I side with? If you have to ask, you probably have reduced yourself to the status of a Talmudnik rat. And you deserve nothing but the worms.

Uglyme #psycho incels.co

[Venting] If I had a big family with lots of sisters, I'd rope on Valentines' day


First off: "oH No, tHiS iNkweL Is eNcoUraGinG SuIciDe :soy::soy::feelstastyman::feelstastyman:" Shut up simptears get the fuck out of here!

Alright, I think Valentine's day is perfect for roping especially if I had a big family with sisters, that would ruin their lives forever cause every time they were fucking their boyfriends on that hollyday, they would remember that's the date her subhuman brother died. To make it even harder to swallow, I'd rope in the middle of the living room, so that when they came back from fucking their fucking boyfriends, the first thing they'd see would be the corpse of their ugly brother hanging from the ceiling. Unfortunately, my only family is my mom so that wouldn't have the same effect.
Disclaimer: "don't rope you have so much to live for :feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha: :feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:"

CertifiedRabbi #fundie reddit.com

Contrary to the common talking point that eugenics is "thoroughly debunked pseudoscience", eugenics is actually one of the most important ideas in all of human history. There's nothing pseudoscientific about the idea of improving the human gene pool. Virtually all scientists, academics, intellectuals, and progressives in the late 19th and early 20th century supported eugenics for a reason: it's the logical conclusion of Darwinian evolution.

We all recognize the importance of keeping the gene pools strong and healthy in other species, but we make an exception for our own species because we think that we're somehow immune from the accumulative effects of dysgenics. Reality check: we're not.
After the Nazis tried to implement their utopian Aryan society through utilizing extremely brutal forms of eugenics, the Western world decided to not only turn their backs on eugenics, but we went in the exact opposite direction by actually celebrating dysgenics.
The left encourages mass 3rd world immigration and miscegenation and embraces various forms of Marxism and egalitarianism, and the right demonizes birth control and abortion and embraces Christian universalism. Adopting 3rd world kids and dating outside of your race has almost become a fashion statement on both the left and the right. And the right has become even more dysgenic by viewing handicapped babies as a blessing from God. At least the left still has enough common sense to abort their handicapped fetuses. That's why down syndrome is almost completely non-existent in Iceland now.

Now, I'm not saying that we should become like the ancient Greeks and practice infanticide by tossing our handicapped babies off of a cliff, or like the early 20th century American progressives by forcibly sterilizing the feeble minded, or like the Nazis by gassing the mentally ill and other undesirables. But we need to start rethinking our opposition to eugenics now that we have enough scientific understanding and technical know-how to implement the utopian promises of eugenics without violating anyone's basic human rights.

We can all agree that countries like Switzerland and Japan greatly benefit from having an average IQ score that's about 30 points higher than the average IQ score in Nigeria and Kenya, right? Well, imagine if we could create a society that had an average IQ score of 130, 150, 180, or even 200. And imagine if we could locate the genes and alleles that make people extremely conscientious. And imagine if we could locate the genes and alleles that allow people to live long, healthy lives and break world records in sports. And imagine if we could humanely remove the genes and alleles that make people prone to criminality. We'd be able to create the most advanced civilization that ever existed within just 3 or 4 generations. And every generation would be a significant improvement over the last generation.

And we could accomplish this utopian vision without forcibly sterilizing or killing anyone. All we'd have to do is subsidize contraception and early-term abortion and make genome sequencing, embryo selection, and precision gene editing mandatory by law. Crime would disappear; productivity, GDP, and technological advancement would sky rocket; political corruption and bad governance in general would be a thing of the past; health care costs would plummet; everyone would look like supermodels; et cetera.
And leftists should support this utopian sci-fi vision as well because we'd finally be able to solve inequality and transcend the primitive tribalism that has defined our species for millennium. We'd also finally be able to fix the underlying genetic shortcomings which have held back the lower classes and brown people over the last several decades. And we'd actually be greatly diminishing human suffering by curing genetic diseases.

Eugenics is also the most logical and effective solution to climate change and a long list of other serious environmental problems. I'm a former far-left environmental extremist, so I'm very aware of the fact that human overpopulation is almost always the root cause of most environmental challenges. I'm also very aware of the fact that exponential human population growth is a looming crisis that barely anyone has the balls to talk about because they don't want to be viewed as creepy misanthropes and Bond villains. But the fact remains that our planet's dwindling natural resources simply can't sustain a population of 10+ billion people, especially if standards of living and consumption levels in the 3rd world continue to rise. So, if we have to dramatically reduce the human population, then selecting for the best and brightest simply makes sense.

taloh #sexist #psycho incels.co

[Serious] I love how you IT bitches think you can stop a man from his primal urges.

You little cunts really think rejecting countless of men and being little cum sucking whores will have no consequences?
You really think the law is gonna stop a man (who will always be physically stronger than a w*man) from raping you in the cunt?
You really think you can stop someone who is stronger than you in literally every aspect?
When a sub 8 man fucks you raw in the cunt pointing a knife to your face remember nobody is going to save you.
:)

Oh yeah and you can send the feds to my house or whatever you faggots do.
I will keep saying what i want.
:feelshaha:

various commenters #fundie reddit.com

RE: Being black in America is a "disability", black law professor argues

(Skynuts)
1963: "I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character"

2018: "Being black in America is a disability"

(fleebly)
So, she's arguing for white supremacy?

(lolelulalily)
white privilege = white supremacy

They've been at it this whole time.

(BasedMcCulloch)
Seriously. There are enough... um, rather dodgy individuals out there routinely citing average black IQ being in the sub-85 region that it seems, well, retarded to give them ammunition like claiming blackness is a disability.

Leftism is a mental illness. And Democrat plantation blacks are so quick to abdicate responsibility and agency that, fuck, sometimes the claim of "85" does not seem so outlandish.

(Perfection_Merchant)
Seeing this idiotic bullshit spewed by my own people is the reason I’m so disappointed in the black community. We have so much potential and when we unite together behind a good cause we have shown what we can achieve. But my own people have been indoctrinated into this bullshit.

MLK would be labeled an Uncle Tom had he existed in today’s times. It’s really disappointing, someday I hope that we can unite together and cause good for our children and our future kin. You have to pull yourself up by the bootstraps and fight for yourself. But instead most of them want to spew a political ideology that only uses them as props. Then send toxic racists like Louis Farrakhan and Al Sharpton who are only good for race baiting.

Then comes along this lady who sees only oppression. It infuriates me each and every day. But I can’t sweat it too much. I feel like Huey Freeman from the Boondocks. I’m just continually cynical and disgusted.

(j0ssv8)
But, what she leaves out is, "The disability only manifests itself while surrounded by other blacks, blacks that do not want you to succeed."

(steveryans2)
It feels very similar to how the LGBT population treats conservative LGBT folks. Blacks have to fight harder to escape their own segment of the population than anything they have to face from the world community at large. Successful black person who is making a living doing something with intellectual purpose? Sold out to the white man. It leaves them in a ponderous catch-22 in that it requires them to succeed in a broad scale, middle-class way doing rap or sports while changing nothing else. It'll never happen.

(heroofadverse)
This is an insult to the Blacks who are healthy, and ready to do honest work to earn a living. In fact, saying someone is disabled because of their race is no less a racist statement.

And this comes out from a law professor. Shame on her.

(Vanguarde2020)
I grew up with a black family next door and their oldest son out of TWELVE kids ( family on welfare, Section 8, food stamps, full free medical care, the entire package ) wanted to better himself and decided to go to college ( free, because of economic status and other factors ) to study law enforcement.

He wanted to become a police officer, and eventually a detective.

His family threw him out of the house at 17, disowned him, and never allowed him to attend their church or family holidays again.

This was a close family. VERY religious. They flat out said the did this because he “betrayed the black community by joining the enemy side”

Blacks have to stop fucking blaming others and fix their god damned family units and warped thinking. Until they do not see the police as the “enemy” they will never full integrate into society and will always play the victim card.