Similar posts

PM_ME_STRIPPERS #sexist reddit.com

A song for all roasties.

Somebody once told me This board was full of roasties I ain't the biggest flap on this page She was looking kinda bad With her pussy torn by Chad to look like an Arby's sandwich

Well the flaps start flappin and they don't stop floppin Show them your beef and the boners stop poppin Didn't make sense to fuck roast beef Makes duck calls when you hear them queef What's it to you, don't be ass sore Nothing's wrong with ditching a flap whore The Arby's scares of all the guys The wind makes their vagoos fly

Hey now, you're a roastie, it's nasty, go away Hey now, you're a roastie, don't want your beef buffet All roasties are whores Get the fuck off my board

It's a sick place, and they blame genetics But Jamal really ruined your pussy aesthetics But the white knights beg to differ Looking at your hole that looks like roast beef dinner The cucks we bait, aren't getting it in The innie virgins are free from sin Their rage is on fire, how about yours? That's the way I like it, FUCK ALL ROASTIE WHORES

Hey now, you're a roastie, it's nasty, go away Hey now, you're a roastie, don't want your beef buffet All roasties are whores Get the fuck off my board

Hey now, you're a roastie, it's nasty, go away Hey now, you're a roastie, don't want your beef buffet All roasties are whores Get the fuck off my board?

Various incels #sexist reddit.com

(Cruelcel)
Female redditors complain about us, but if a robust Chad said the same things to their face, they'd cream themselves and agree with him.

"Misogyny" is the term when we say it, but when Chad does it's "I love how real he is" and "he's soooo cocky and arrogant, I luv it" and "I can change him."

Lmao wake up and smell the roast beef laddies

(smileatthecrocodile)
In war women have been known to adopt the ideology of the opposing force for their own gain after their husbands and brothers and fathers die for them. Females, females never change.

(fart_fetish)
Years of racial, class, and lookism inequality evaporates when an Alpha Chad decides to open his mouth.

(incelwarrior95)
why do females even use reddit?

(totalyrespecatbleguy)
Cause they want attention

(incelwarrior95)
dont thye have other things to do?

(HomoheroBishii)
Misogynist Chad turns them on more than Nice Guy Chad.

Edmund_Kemper #psycho #sexist #pedo incels.co

[Serious] Am I weird for having fantasies about cannibalism?

When a foid on reddit admits to having rape fantasies, people tell her it’s normal. People think BDSM or whatever is okay. But I’m a freak if I fantasize about cannibalism once in a while because I see a young woman’s soft smooth youthful skin? Sure I don’t get into the fantasies too much and hell, sometimes I fantasize about it sarcastically. But sometimes I see a young woman’s soft youthful skin and her soft feminine eyes and I kinda think “is she going to taste good if I eat her for dinner?”. Sometimes I feel a bit hungry if I see a landwhale despite an absence of sexual attraction because their fatness makes them look like they’re yummy food.

Sure, it’s a bit sick, but I won’t act on it, nor do I want to, the fantasy is very temporary. Also, anyone who puked while reading this is a pussy and isn’t a real man.

kinda weird ngl

Up to 9% of men have fantasized about sex with prepubescent children and 33% fantasized about rape, and this is weird?

Yes, its weird.

And what about people here fapping to naked 10 year old anime girls?

yes it's very weird stop coping

Cope. People here fantasize about weirder shit

What's wrong with fapping to 2D girls? They are not real.
People who fap to real 10 year old girls are creepy and weird.

At least cannibalism is a high T manly thing to do

These numbers are probably lower than they actually are because men would not tell the truth when asked a question like that.

The bohemian lifestyle of the average foid would probably make them taste gross. Give me a roast beef over a roastie plz.

66% of men have said in a survey that they’ve fantasized about young girls

There's an interesting video about what human meat tastes like, apparently it's like veal

So a young woman’s soft hairless skin actually would taste good?

I hope you're right.

When I think of evil, I think of a serial killer or a terrorist, not a guy who has consensual sex with jb teens

What makes me mad the most about all that agecucked shit is the hypocrisy. Yes, many actions related to porn and/or sex with underage people are immoral. According to Jesus, even coveting people who are not your husbands/wives sexually is immoral. I agree. But why the focus only on agecucked shit when the world nowadays is pretty much Sodom and Gomorrah but on a global scale?

The answer is feminism.

When I watch supervillain shows and movies, none of the villains are into sex with minors, they just destroy the world and kill people

you think the fraction of men who've had rape fantasies is less than a third? LOL

No they fantasized about PERPETRATING the rape

I think it comes off as a bit weird, but if it remains just a fantasy, I don't see a problem with it, tbh.

Some foids look like food

don't you find the human body fascinating ? i would love to explore it personally, but that would require a body, and im not gonna kill lol.

I think female skin is tasty if I try eating it for dinner

Warlock791 & GigaSpergcel #sexist #pedo reddit.com

(Warlock791)

From a biological perspective, that's perfectly normal and healthy.

Society has imposed the arbitrary number of 18 because they want foids to get educated and they know how hard it is for the roasties to keep their roast beef in their pants.

If society wasn't brainwashing men into thinking that women younger than 18 (but older than 13) are children, those underage teens would be getting pregnant all of the time and the foid education project would have failed very quickly and spectacularly.

(GigaSpergcel)

Reminder that foid education is one of the most useless wastes of tax money. Firstly, they do not have the drive and disagreeableness to actually get impressive things done. Secondly, most of foids become homemaker anyhow, as it should be, or work in like retail where you do not need general education. Lastly, educated women are much more hypergamous, which contributed to the incel problem which in turn are a massive burden on the economy because they are demotivated, depressed and destructive as fuck

Laura Wood #fundie thinkinghousewife.com

I disagree. Pizza as we know it represents the death of civilization. Fast food is spiritual starvation.

In modern times, the end of civilization is not chaotic, but orderly and convenient. On the surface, it is smoothly functioning and even appealing. But the sky might as well be falling and barbarians might as well be rushing into our homes. So serious is the loss of civility, beauty, courtesy, wonder, and love - all the things that distinguish human beings from animals and civilization from mere survival.

Pizza is just bread with tomatoes and cheese, and I agree with you that there is nothing objectionable about that in itself. As an occasional treat, especially when it is homemade, it is not bad at all. But in its pervasive, modern, industrial foamboard incarnation, pizza is animal feed. It is so radically inferior to the simple boiled cabbage and potatoes of your parents’ childhood that it’s impossible to consider them in the same category. One is denatured factory fare. The other is field and sun. One is a cash transaction. The other is mutual aid. One is sloth. The other is labor. One is commerce. The other is love.

Your grandmothers took cabbage and potatoes, cut them up and then made them into food for their families. They might even have grown these foods in their own gardens. (Regardless, the cabbage and potatoes they used would have been much higher in nutrients than the cabbage and potatoes found in most stores today.) Your grandmothers were not paid workers when they did this work. They were not making food for strangers. Even if they made these things poorly, there was something personal about their neglect. Your parents sat around family tables to consume their cabbage and potatoes. Their small portion of beef on Sunday was part of a time-honored ritual, part of a day devoted to leisure even for the poorest man. And when people feuded at the table or disagreed with one another, even when children misbehaved, there was something personal about their interactions. They talked and cooperated. They did more than grab slices from a greasy box and eat them with their hands. They didn’t sit in a communal dining hall sipping soda with strangers. They didn’t watch television with the cardboard boxes splayed before them. The shared cabbage was more than food. It was the rhythm of nature, the struggle for existence and human order. It was a meal with form and structure. Food has an ethical dimension and simple food is not necessarily coarse when part of a shared ritual.

At the end of the meal, that greasy box sits on the table. Does anyone think fondly of it? Will anyone wistfully recall the greasy pizza boxes of their childhood the way they might recall their grandmother’s simple noodles or the roast beef that infused the house with its smell? I remember once showing up at my grandmother’s house when I was a child and she made me a simple ham sandwich with ham she had roasted the day before. It was one of the best meals I have ever had in my whole life. There was something mysteriously good about it.

Fast food and convenience wraps, paninis, nachos and McMeals have dumbed down food preparation so much that many people have no cultural memory of dishes like cabbage and potatoes, meals that are cheap, satisfying and extremely easy to make. It takes about 20 minutes and $5 to make a meal of cabbage and potatoes, not counting the time spent shopping. It’s an excellent meal, as long as the cabbage is not overcooked. I could easily eat it five nights a week.

The English-speaking world does indeed have a history of good food and fast food is a radical break with this history, as different from the food of the past as Soviet architecture is from a gabled and turreted Victorian building or a small thatched cottage. The French and Italians are more sensual and intelligent with food, but the English-speaking world historically fed itself well, with the different ethnic groups expressing their ties to the past and their connection to land and sea in their own ways. Meat pies, biscuits, fresh cheeses, simple vegetables, homemade breads with fresh butter, broiled fish, roast potatoes - these are all traditional British and American soul food. In Victorian times, even a humble, middle class family might put a white tablecloth on the table for a weeknight dinner of any of these simple things.

One in three Americans is now obese and the country’s disastrous weight gain parallels the growth in convenience foods. I disagree with those who think large numbers of people can stay in good health on fast food that is lower in carbohydrates or healthier in other ways. There can be better fast food and it doesn’t need to be as devastating as it is, but fast food will always be incapacitating. People forget how to fend for themselves and lose a sense of their own physical environment, even their own bodies.

“Animals eat; only man dines,” said the cooknook author Isabella Beeton. What we eat makes us who we are:

The nation which knows how to dine has learnt the leading lesson of progress. It implies both the will and the skill to reduce to order, and surround with idealisms and graces, the more material conditions of human existence; and wherever that will and skill exist, life cannot be wholly ignoble.

some incels #sexist reddit.com

image

(notreallyinceliswear)
Male depression: Complete despair, no hope, future is nothing but pointless struggle just to survive alone. Deeply ingrained shame and humiliation, embarrassed to show his face in public because everyone sees what a pathetic failure he is. Puts a bullet in his head because life has literally gotten that bad.

Female depression: In a bad mood due to hangover from all the partying she did the last few nights, feeling lonely due to lack of a steady boyfriend since Chadlite dumped her for cheating on him a month ago. Spends a few hours alone and feels she isn't receiving the attention she is entitled to from prime males. Takes various measures on social media to acquire that attention. Usually starts by posting a "no-makeup" selfie to fish for compliments, but she gets less than 40 likes. Starts posting about her lifelong struggle with mental health and body image to drum up good publicity. Still not getting enough attention especially compared to that bitch Stacy who's getting over a hundred likes on all her vacation bikini pics even though she's a total slut and her boobs aren't even as big as they look in her selfies, ugh fucking bitch. Finally she sees that a sub5 orbiter had the fucking audacity to comment on her no-makeup selfie and that really sets her off. She takes a razor and makes some horizontal cuts on her wrist so she can "accidentally" let people see them to add a layer of mystery to her persona. She'll show them to the therapist Daddy pays for, and have them legitimized officially as a suicide attempt she can reference in the future when discussing her difficult life and mental health problems.

(JFLmaxx)
Mac Miller was known to be insecure. He coped with these troubles with substance abuse.

•Whorianna Grande quickly got with another guy after they broke up.

•One day on Twitter, she reported the gargantuan size of her new BFs cock which was likely an attempt at emasculating Miller.

•Miller already having issues and perhaps being heartbroken accidentally roped while coping on drugs.

The damage women inflict is insidious.

Teehee.

(shetoldmeto80)
It is absolutely staggering how much women expect men to take care of their emotional and mental issues... whilst men are expected to just "man up" when faced with similar (or often worse) hardships.

Full disclosure: I was with a woman with depression for ... a long time... took care of her, tried to make her smile etc... in the end one time I broke down in a massive way (because I was seriously ill and thus exhausted), she went straight to Chad to tell him I was a pussy (I still have the logs of their conversations) then proceeded to fuck another Chad

(IndraMaheshwar)
Now imagine if a male celebrity dumped his depressed girlfriend and went on to fuck another Stacy in the most public way possible, and then she roped. The very same cunts on social media would absolutely SLAUGHTER him and ruin his reputation for millenia.

(TruthInBlack)
Ariana Grande's crimes against men are unforgivable. She is directly responsible for Mac Miller's death and she knows this so she writes some stupid ass song to pretend like she cared. She will burn in hell.

(hhhh__)
When a woman senses weakness in a man the caveman part of her brain signals that she, and most importantly her offspring, are at risk. Jfl at people that think billions of years of evolution can be erased by a couple thousand years of civilization.

(anewcenturysrecord)
"Women are worthless degenerate infants whose lives are so easy they bore themselves into a depression and you have to be her man servant until she decides to stop being a lazy fucking cunt. If you slave away hard enough she might not leave you for the next Chad who comes along!"

(Former-Incel-User)
This is why you should never be sad or weak around a girl. Only be angry or show zero emotion. Always be selfish, narcissistic and psychopathic, but sprinkle in a bit of love to keep her hooked. Cheat on her. Fuck with her head. Do not provide for her outside of your cock.

Hell it would be more attractive to laugh at your girl for being depressed than it would be to be beta and take care of her.

(notreallyinceliswear)
Women need to be treated like children. This is basically well-known in species memory that they are irrational, retarded and insane by human standards. The problem emerged when we started patronizing these grown children and telling them they are grownups too.

John J #racist pjmedia.com

Go Mittens!
You’re makin’ all the right people foam at the mouth!
While you’re contemplating why the media are having such a hissy fit (and always do) when the subject of BLACK PEOPLE comes up, it’s because, although you’d never know it from television and politics, there just ain’t that many of them.
And some of us WHITE PEOPLE are fed up with being played by them. When food stamp people get pounds of sliced roast beef at the deli while I’m there to get the discount rolls for my lunch, something is totally rotten in Denmark! I’m PAYING FOR THEIR roast beef, yet can’t afford it, myself, because I’m taxed to frikkin’ DEATH!
If mentioning that way too many blacks and illegals are on welfare pleases whites and makes blacks sad, go for it!
Again, like queers, there just ain’t that many of them. If they didn’t always lie and cheat, they’d never win crap!

various incels #fundie reddit.com

(BF8211)
If you're offended by the roast beef/large hole posts...

Now you know how it feels to be judged, mocked, and rejected over things that are out of your control. While you get triggered over an internet post, imagine how fucking humiliating and degrading it is to get told "you're not tall enough" or (if you even make it that far) "your dicks not big enough" in real life.
Yes- We understand getting fucked repeatedly doesn't stretch you out, that's not how female anatomy works, stop posting the same god damn comment on every b8 post
Yes- We understand roast flaps are genetic, but as long as you're going to reject guys for being short or having a small dick, we're going to keep posting these low-blow posts
No- You aren't some genius biologist just because you told a few people (who are joking, mind you) that the hymen breaks during physical activity as a Kindergartner or that the vagoo doesn't get stretched from sex, stop acting like you are

(knajjd11)
cope, the vagina can get looser permanently:
http://www.nhs.uk/Livewell/vagina-health/Pages/vagina-after-childbirth.aspx

(Rotunda_)
Sorry roasties, but Chad thinks your beef curtains are fucking disgusting.

(zielony4)
EXACTLY.
If women claim the circumference is genetic then now they know how it feels for men to be shamed for height and race and penis size.
Since women make fun of our traits, we should continue what we are doing.
Since its so genetic, Chad's on tinder should go and write "swipe left if you are wider than ___cm non aroused."

(anonymous92818312)
Roasties get so offended when their hole is insulted because it's literally the only thing that they have of any worth whatsoever. They know without a vagina they are just useless bags of meat. Downvote this if you're mad.

Sparrow's Song #sexist incels.co

We cannot restore the old patriarchy, it wouldn't fix our faces anyway... We need a Neo-Patriarchy.

Consider a society with nationalized healthcare, facial surgery for anyone who needs it, artificial wombs for anyone who wants them, realistic and affordable waifubots that are superior to foids in every way... This would be a patriarchal society that femasites could not complain about because since we would have no use for them, they would not be "oppressed". We could build a wall and outside of our advanced society, the current, barbaric, matriarchal cuckold society can remain intact as long as it can support itself.

This might sound gay but hear me out... Ectogenesis will be available soon, but CRISPR will still be very expensive. Males, with ectogenesis and stem cell technology, can reproduce asexually, one drop of blood can produce sperm or eggs in a lab. If you want to reproduce asexually but cannot afford to modify your genes with CRISPR, you will have the option of starting a "bromance" family with another straight male who's genetics would combine favorably with yours. This is not traditional by any means, but this is better than cuckolding, telegony, and allowing your bloodline to end with you. I would argue that today's femasites are so selfish and barbaric, that a child raised by two straight males in a "bromance" household would have a better upbringing than a child raised by a single mother who ignores it's cries while passed out in a puddle of chad cum surrounded by empty Smirnoff Ice bottles and Xanax pills. In reality, these children would have FOUR parents as opposed to ONE single mother because not only would the child have two bro dads but it would have two waifubot mothers as well. The bros can sustain a population by fathering two children each, you would have one child made from your sperm and your bro's egg and one child from your egg and you bro's sperm.

To make our society fair for femoids, we would not have only sons, daughters would be born in even number to sons. However, all sex between humans would be illegal, men are only allowed to fuck waifubots and foids are only allowed to fuck chadbots. The punishment for having sex with another human is exile, violators would be forcefully removed and left on the other side of the wall to join the roasties, cucks, and chads. Sex between humans is an act of violence towards the genes of other humans who are not having sex, the root of all evil humans do to other humans is sexual reproduction and sexual competition, therefore sex between two humans is seen as the most severe form of barbarism and forbidden in our advanced and merciful society. We would even allow people to leave without violating the sex rule if they wish, they would be educated about how our society works versus how the chad harem/cuckold society on the other side of the wall works and would be free to choose which society they want to live in at 14.

Even without the wall or separate societies, we should be pushing for bromance households, waifubots, and artificial wombs. We are not trying to "oppress" femoids or "make them obsolete", we are simply trying become sexually and reproductively independent from them. Sub8 males and LGBT people deserve dignified options for reproduction and family starting. If the foids say "asexual reproduction is misogynistic", we can say "you've made yourselves independent from men and in charge of your own reproduction, we deserve to be independent from femasites and in charge of our own reproduction"... If the conservacucks say "a family is only for a man and a woman and should only be started through natural means", we can say "silly bigot, don't force your outdated cultural norms on us, times have changed, it's the 21st century"... If the foids and cucks say "it's not natural to have sex with a robot", we can say "being robosexual isn't a choice, I was born this way, robosexuals are people too and deserve as much rights as anyone else, stop trying to oppress us, bigots"...

TL;DR:
We cannot go back to the old patriarchy, the masses will never accept it because they are too cucked. Even if we could, the arranged marriage foids wouldn't be attracted to us and would lust after chads anyway. The only way to win is to be more progressive than the progressives, we need to be sexually and reproductively independent from femoids. The so called "progressives" have no reason to oppose this, it doesn't negatively affect foids in anyway and it helps LGBT people. The current ideal family unit in The West is a single mother roastie and her neglected bastards or a landwhale cumslut and her soon to be divorced raped cuck hubby hanging from the ceiling in the other room by an electrical cord while the bastard child plays fortnite on mommy's phone aka chad summoning device. The future ideal happy family will be two bromosexuals on NEETbux taking bong hits on the couch and playing vidya while their waifubots do all the housework and get their genetically superior, asexually created children ready for school.

Lookismisreal #sexist reddit.com

Fuck white women

We live in a time where every race of men desire white femoids more than their own race of femoids, in which has created not only a huge imbalance, but has also increased white femoids egos tenfold: white bitches are now officially every mans whore.

We all know the answer as to why men exclusively seek white femoids: because they are more attractive than femoids of color. (Anyone who denies this fact is an idiot.) The average white cunt has a much larger appeal than the average black, brown or asian femoid. Just accept it.

But, despite how good looking they maybe, none of them are relationship material. They are extremely entitled, shallow and have huge egos. Not only they know that even the most ugliest one of them could have a huge horde of oribiters pursuing them, they know that men will do anything just to get a piece their yeast filled roast beefs.

White femoids have a thing about aspiring to be sluts in an early age thinking how being promiscuous is empowering for them. This is one of the main reasons why they can't be loyal or trustworthy partners in a relationship. I mean, just think about it: after rampant years of promiciousty one does not simply go into monogamous relationship. These vapid cunts are also known alot to cucking and cheating on their partners with people who are more good looking or rich.

Degeneracy is also very rampant with them. They have no problem fucking animals and doing god knows what with them. Oh, and not to mention the gold digging. If you have money, no matter how ugly you're, they'll want you. But they'll fuck chad from the side while showing a charade of affection at you. So, prepared to get cucked while at it.

The only thing these sluts are good for is pumping and dumping. Anything other than that is a clear waste of time.

theantifeminist #sexist theantifeminist.com

10 years ago professional jailbait sites were (marginally) legal (13 year old models posing in bikinis and thongs- with paid for membership to view all the galleries) – it was called NN (non-nude). It was an open secret in the adult industry that these sites were making far more money than even the hardcore 18 year old teen porn sites.

Yes, that’s right, when the market had a choice, more people would readily pay to view pics of 13,14,15 year old girls in bikinis than they would pics and videos of 18 year old pornstars being fucked up the ass.

Incel Wiki #sexist wiki.incels.info

Roastie

Roastie is a word for insufferable women that makes fun of something women can't change without extremely invasive surgery: their labia. Implying their labia looks like roast beef. This is in response to women who height shame men as men cannot change their height. The difference is that men generally don't give any actual fucks about women's labias and it's just a joke feminists claim to be upset about. While women give enormous fucks about the height of men, usually refusing to date any men shorter than them. Again, height being something men can't change without even more invasive surgery than a labiaplasty.

Representative-Way39 #sexist #crackpot #dunning-kruger i.redd.it

Advice to foids on how to take care of their vagina because they’re too dumb to figure it out on their own therefore require men to teach them

modern vaginas are just as repulsive as their bearers.. all historically depicted pussies are neat and tucked, they didn't have massive dildos or have sex with countless men. and no pedo but young prepubescent girls have roast beef, this shit only happens after they start jamming shit up there.

GIRLS when you put your tampons in do it delicately, too many of you pull the vagina to the side too roughly, OF COURSE doing that is going to cause the flaps to become worn and become loose and dangle. you fucking stupid repulsive cunts, god damn yous are so stupid, you can't even handle taking care of your vagina without men having to tell you what to do. fucking idiots.

foreignincel #sexist reddit.com

Normies always look out for a fake purpose in everything they do.

Posting a selfie of your ugly face that never actually cared one bit for the consequences of the patriarchy as an unjust social system that enforces gender roles and is oppressive to both men and women and then labeling it as "this is what feminism looks like" while your heightist bigoted ass discriminate against short men , just normie things.

Bullying people and Incels telling them to drink bleach and justifying yourself by saying you saved a life ? just normie things , OH and don't forget to tell them it's their personality that doesnt get them laid while you fuck girls left and right and say that there is only two genders.

sexting girls on r/gonewild while you have a girlfriend and justifying your act buy saying you are helping those girls have faith in themselves and destroy their insecurities ? just normie things.

Post your hairy roastie beef between your legs on r/gonewild and justifying it by saying your husband doesn't make you feel pretty enough and it makes you depressed ? just normie things.

browse r/incels saying you want to help and ghost all incels you talk to the moment brad text you or the moment you have to step out from your confort zone to help a suicidal incel ? just normie things.

Normies are evil, don't ever ever trust them.If Normies were nice all normies would be SJW's or feminists.

soulartemis #sexist #psycho incels.co

[Based] Video of college foid getting railed in dorm

Walked by a hallway at midnight and heard some dumb bitch in college whining while getting railed in the dorms, so I took a video of it :lul:

I can't post the video on this site because it keeps giving me an error, I've tried attaching it to this post and everything
If you want it, link below (hit the triangle play button next to the file):
[link removed]
It’s honestly surreal that all these foids in college get railed several times a week, and a few years down the line someone’s putting a ring on that finger and wifing up that gaping herpes infested roast beef pussy jfl

BabyFuck McGirlsex #sexist #crackpot #dunning-kruger incels.co

[Based] The VAGINA is the filthiest place in the entire Milky Way Galaxy

* The vagina is a very filthy organ in and of itself with a lot of nasty flora and fauna resident therein
* Now, imagine the Average foid in her 20's who has fucked literally 100's of chads who all cum inside her and creampie her roast beef hole
* The Clinical Anatomy & pathology science of MICROCHIMERARISM states that foids retain DNA from all the men they fucked.
* Coupled with the fact that foids dont wash inside their vaginas ("its a self cleaning system teehee") imagine just how filthy a foids pussy must be
* The degenerate sex havers who "eat pussy" are probably the reason why mouth cancers and throat cancers among other cancers have increased in recent times. Some based Scientistcel should do a study on how many Modern diseases have been created by eating filthy unwashed foid pussies tbh ngl
* I bet COVID-19 was caused when an escortcelling Wuhancel decided to JohnnySinsMaxx and eat the pussy of a Noodlewhore who hadn't washed her pussy since the day she was born and those filthy disgusting pussy juices went into his respiratory system and mutated to create COVID-19.


* TLDR : PUSSY IS FILTHY GARBAGE

Various incels #sexist reddit.com

(comments on this article: Woman born without vagina raising money so she can have sex"

(fatcell102)
"“He doesn’t really focus on the sexual side of our relationship because we can’t do anything since I don’t have a vaginal opening,” she said." -from the article. WTF? She has three holes, so if one doesn't work, she can use the other two, that is a pretty weak excuse not to have sex, I am suprised her Chad bf sticks around with her, if she is such a prude.

(jmeekspersonality)
Can't she live without sex? Sex is overrated, as we all know.

(zZacharyChad)
I wanna have sex, too. Send me money.

(zielony4)
HOLY CRAP I bet the entire inceltears donated lol.

I hope she dies in surgery as well.

(bycrozz)
I hope she dies on the surgery table.

(BasedTruecel)
But why? Sex isn't everything!

(Incel9100)
Fucking LOL @ the cucks donating so she can fuck chad

(dr_gunit)
i think thats the highest level of cuckery that can be reached? what could be more cucked out than creating her privlege and entitlement

(anonymous92818312)
Inceltears is donating as we speak.

(_Ryo_Hazuki)
Her boyfriend is male model tier...though she's fairly attractive herself.

(ShinJoe)
I'm sure he has turned her anus into a roast beef sandwich.

(smileatthecrocodile)
her anus could be used as a submarine base at this point

(dr_gunit)
Fund it!

God was acting like a misogynist!

(incelwarrior95)
why is she model tier?

Church of Almighty God #racist holyspiritspeaks.org

God has appropriately distributed all these different types of races so that these different races are distributed across different parts of the world. In these different parts of the world, God long since prepared an environment for survival suitable for each different race of human. Within these types of environment for survival, God has prepared for them the soil’s color and components. The components in white people’s bodies and black people’s bodies are not the same, and are also different from the components of people’s bodies of other colors. When God created all beings, He had already prepared such an environment for survival. His purpose in that was so that when that type of people started to multiply, when they started to increase in number, they could be fixed within that scope. Before God created human beings He had already thought it all out—He’d give a certain area to white people to allow them to develop and survive.

So when God was creating the earth He already had a plan, He had intention and purpose in what He was putting into that piece of land, and what would be nurtured on that piece of land. For example, God long ago prepared what mountains, how many plains, how many water sources, what kinds of birds and beasts, what fish, and what plants would be on that land. When preparing an environment for survival for a type of human being, for a race, God considered many aspects of issues: the geographical environment, the components of the soil, the types of birds and beasts, the size of the various types of fish, the components in the fish, different water qualities, as well as all the different types of plants…. God had long ago prepared all of that. That type of environment is a native environment for survival that God created and prepared for white people.

You should be able to see that when God created all beings, He put a lot of thought into it. He did things with a plan. Now you can see that, right? (God’s considerations for various types of people were very thoughtful. For the environment for survival for different types of humans, He prepared the kinds of birds and beasts and the kinds of fish, how many mountains and how many plains there would be. All of it was considered very thoughtfully and precisely.) For example, what food do white people primarily eat? (It’s mainly high protein foods—different types of meat, dairy products, and wheat-based foods.) The foods that white people eat are very different from the foods that Asian people eat. The staple foods that white people eat are primarily meat, eggs, milk, and poultry. Grains such as bread and rice are generally non-staple foods that are put to the side of the plate. Even when eating salad, which is made up of vegetables, they put some roasted beef or chicken in it.

Even if they eat some wheat-based foods, they add cheese, eggs, or meat to it. That is to say, their staple foods aren’t primarily made up of wheat-based foods or rice; they eat quite a lot of meat and cheese. They often drink ice water because they eat really high-calorie foods. When they eat a meal, before the food is served everyone drinks a glass of ice water first, so white people are really robust. These are the sources for their lives, their environments for living prepared for them by God, allowing them to have that kind of lifestyle. That lifestyle is different from the lifestyles of people of other colors. There is no right or wrong in this lifestyle—it is inborn, predestined by God and because of God’s rule and His arrangements. This type of race has a certain lifestyle and certain sources for their livelihood which is because of their race, as well as because of the environment for survival prepared for them by God. You could say that the environment for survival God prepared for white people and the daily food they obtain from that environment is rich and plentiful.

ArmondDillo #sexist reddit.com

"Harriet is the UK's youngest female news and travel multimedia journalist."

Youngest travelling roast beef whore, trekking across the globe for all manner of exotic Chad dick.

I like how "youngest" is the only characteristic that separates her, that won't last long.

With a mug like that, she should be incel.

Cephaliarch #fundie reddit.com

Was Donald Trump the best candidate to pick for zoo rights as a way of preventing the cat lady demographic from taking over the White House and Supreme Court?

1) You just know Clinton had two justices lined up a good deal more liberal than Merrick Garland, and we'd absolutely end up with two more Ginsburgs (once she kicks the bucket because seriously, she's old). You're not going to see a lefty SC pick defending bestiality on a national level, and while you're not going to see a standard conservative do so either, you'd be more likely to get a Libertarian justice under Trump who just might be edgy as fuck enough to do so.

2) She's reblogging George Takei shitposts. She's liking every post on Occupy Democrat. She's knitting her hat for the pussy march between strokes of her housecat's back. She's signing online petitions. She's sobbing about endangered species and animal welfare while she has a beef roast preparing in her slow cooker. She's having her morning Starbucks instant coffee before heading out to brunch with the girls to have even more Starbucks coffee and talk about the latest thing Trump did that she read on Thinkprogress, and you just know her minivan has a COEXIST sticker on the back of it.

It's the most staunch enemy of zoophiles in the past few decades, the white feminist liberal cat lady. Or maybe staunch isn't the right word, because the cat lady doesn't really fixate on any particular cause, and doesn't have much energy to do anything but sit around on Facebook clicking on fake news article and getting outraged about whatever social causes her media sphere tells her to get outraged about. But, mind you, this is separate from what Reddit usually chimps it about in regards to >THE SJWS REEEEEEEEEEE. Because while the common social justice warrior actually makes an effort at being woke, the cat lady is mostly driven by simple moral disgust, and is actually pretty fucking ignorant when it comes to the issues outside of the bubble of being a straight, cisgendered middle class white woman.

"Ugh! I miss when presidential candidates had class. I miss the days of Reagan and Kennedy," you'll hear her pine, without any irony whatsoever and despite being a 21st century Democrat. "I can't believe our children's president is going to be someone who says 'grab them by the you-know-what!' What will we tell them?"
"These poor, starving Syrian children! Did you see that picture of that dead one washed up on the coast? Bless his little heart, we should take in the entire MENA region to save all of those kids."

"Bestiality? Ugh! Sick, sick, sick! They should get raped by an animal and see how they like it! Here's a link to donate to the Humane Society, everyone."

Take a look at the end of this video.

Take a look at any Facebook or local news comments section.
https://www.vice.com/en_uk/article/animal-fuckers-219

It's just cat ladies. It's almost always the cat ladies screeching about the evil animal rapists, combined with the occasional dumbass old right-wing cat lady who believes that Obama is the devil and shares even more autistic memes than the left-wing cat lady does, and there's a pretty high chance she ended up staying home or voting for Clinton regardless because she was too emotionally distraught as a result of some of Trump's remarks. And that isn't to say that there's not non-cat ladies against bestiality too, because seriously, most people are, but it's cat ladies who are prone to outrage and boredom enough to adopt fighting it as their pet cause because they actually do not have anything more interesting to do in their life and they aren't politically savvy enough to actually care about causes more important.

Thoughts? And really, Trump/Bannon do not strike me as being the type to actually give a shit about zoophilia at all, whether it's supporting or opposing it. Trump's a moral degenerate when it comes to sex, and Bannon is much more concerned about other cultural battles as well as the impending horde of migrants from South America that will be heading up north once global warming really starts to kick in.

Fontaine #fundie incels.co

My general theory of politics and culture in the 21st century

Every day, the world is becoming more divided into two factions. I would go as far as to say that the world is becoming ever more divided into two worlds{/i]. The two worlds are already clashing. This clash is extremely painful to human psychology and is responsible for a lot of cases of depression or suicide; the incel predicament is one symptom among many. The conflict will continually increase until at some point in the 21st century, no sooner than 2040 but no later than 2080, a great clash ("the big event") will bring absolute, total victory to one world. The victory will either be perfectly bloodless, or a devastating carnage that will tear open the bowels of this planet: there will be no intermediate solution.

I will name them world A and world B. Below, I will list attributes and characteristics of each world. They are not necessarily interlinked; some can even be contradictory. If you think I have gone crazy, bear with me and be patient. Everything will become clear in the end.

World A: State, Nation, Law, war, family, religion, conservatism, traditionalism, nationalism, patriotism, anti-semitism, marriage, Russia, René Guénon, Codreanu, Julius Evola, Adolf Hitler, Aleksandr Dugin, Christian Orthodoxy, white nationalism, Iran, Islam, cautiouness, reluctance to change, anti-feminism, anti-capitalism, racism, racialism, hierarchy, alt-right, Richard Spencer, death, heredity, eugenics, art, soul, cemetery, military chaplain, apple pie, roast beef, chimney, wood fire, Luddism, tribunal, gallows, military service, rifle, sword.

World B: Internationalism, capitalism, technology, progressivism, pacifism, feminism, liberalism, nihilism, atheism, transhumanism, divorce, Jews, Protestants, Silicon Valley, crypto currency, stock market, the internet, cyborg, China, anti-racism, Elon Musk, Larry Page, Sergey Brin, Larry Ellison, Jeff Bezos, Justin Trudeau, genetic engineering, ramen, avocado salad, electricity, self-learning, peer-to-peer networks, longevity research, cryonics, computer, drone, robot, democracy, Barack Obama, plastic surgery, emigration, atom bomb.

Well, what do you make of everything I've just brainstormed? Here are possible answers, depending on your personality:

- World A is basically conservatism, world B liberalism.
- World A is reassuring, world B scares me.
- World A is what I want, world B is what I hate.
- In both worlds there are things I want, and things I hate. Why can't we do a synthesis?

My personal opinion is that world A corresponds to applied terror management theory, while world B is basically an attempt to remove ourselves from the shackles of nature so as to end heredity, aging and death.

I am also utterly convinced that {b]no synthesis is possible, even if it appears wishable. Psychological suffering will thus continue. We are stuck in an antebellum period where world A and world B will continually face each other without coming to a permanent resolution, before at least two decades more.

If you have any question, I'd be glad to answer them.

Extreme vegans and David Dewey #fundie theguardian.com

Feet away from the butchers carving pork loins and beef shanks, the owners of a California meat shop have installed a peculiar sign in their window: “ATTENTION: Animals’ lives are their right. Killing them is violent and unjust, no matter how it’s done.” The odd poster seeming to discourage customers from buying their meats is the result of a months-long dispute between the owners of the Local Butcher Shop – which sells “locally sourced, sustainably raised” meat – and animal rights activists who have staged more than a dozen loud and gruesome protests outside the family-owned business in Berkeley.

With the placement of the sign, written by the activist group Direct Action Everywhere, the vegan protesters have agreed to cease their weekly rallies outside the shop, which sometimes involved nearly nude protesters dripping in fake blood and wrapped in plastic, along with recordings of pigs screaming inside a slaughterhouse.

The 15in-by-15in sign began receiving international attention this week after the activists declared victory, following four months of protests and counter-protests among liberals in the northern California college city widely known for the 1960s free speech movement and anti-war hippies. The anti-meat activists have claimed that the sign is a groundbreaking win and are now promising to target other independent merchants with similar tactics that they hope will spread across the US.

“To be threatened and forced to abide by their beliefs just makes me sad,” said co-owner Monica Rocchino as she sat outside the shop on Wednesday afternoon while customers nearby munched on the sandwich of the day. “Their tactics are really extremist … This is ethical extortion.” Rocchino and her husband, Aaron, opened the shop in 2011, promoting meats in line with a California food culture that values fresh and ethical produce.

Matt Johnson, a Direct Action Everywhere organizer, said that he and his group “challenge places that do put this ‘humane’ marketing out there. People are paying a lot more for these dead animals … They have some notion that these animals are being treated well.”

The group argues that there is no ethical way to kill animals for food and are campaigning to make Berkeley the first “city free of violence toward animals” – meaning banning the sale of meat. The Rocchinos, who partner with local farmers and offer butchery classes, reached out to the activists to find a resolution. Direct Action Everywhere leaders eventually said they would end the protests if the shop agreed to become a “vegan butcher” that did not sell any meat, or if they canceled classes.

Unwilling to sacrifice their entire business, the owners later agreed to a third option: a sign condemning the killing of animals. The activists made two additional concessions: the sign could be three inches smaller than they originally proposed and the shop could place it in a slightly less prominent storefront window. But they said they reserved the right to two protests a year, and that the agreement was “temporary”.

“We want businesses and our culture to face the truth about violence against animals,” said Paul Darwin Picklesimer, an activist who negotiated the agreement, adding: “We do feel that animals are people. We don’t feel that only humans are people, but of course it’s not universally accepted.” The attack on the Berkeley shop and threats of similar protests have sparked backlash across the state.

“I don’t understand why activists would pick on a mom-and-pop shop supporting the most humane farmers, rather than the animal factories and meatpackers responsible for brutality on an unimaginably greater scale,” said Michael Pollan, the well-known American food writer and a University of California, Berkeley professor, in an email. “Unless you believe the complete abolition of meat-eating is a realistic goal, attacking this sector of the animal economy … strikes me as misguided.”

There is a McDonald’s a few blocks away, he added. David Dewey, president of the California Association of Meat Processors, blamed cartoons for making children believe that animals have emotions and feelings. He added: “This is the order of things, even in the wild. Fish eat other fish. Birds eat other birds … That’s just the way the world circles.”

Johnson said the sign was meant to stigmatize meat-eating in the way tobacco warnings discouraged smoking. “Our vision of the world is a world in which every animal has a right to live happy, safe and free as humans by and large do,” he said.

Asked about the rights of humans who aren’t safe and free, such as prisoners, Johnson said: “It’s a form of deflection. It’s a way of not thinking about the issue at hand.”

“I feel like anybody coming here already knows where their meat comes from,” said Ariel Lay, 28, who decided to visit the shop for the first time after reading about the controversy. “They are not going to look at the sign and say, ‘Oh, I had no idea!’” In between bites of her roast beef sandwich, she added, “The whole, ‘We are not going to stop until Berkeley is a vegan city’ thing rubbed me the wrong way. You’re not going to tell me what to eat.”

Richard Healey, a 74-year-old not-for-profit consultant, who works next door to the shop and buys lunch there twice a week, said he suspected people wouldn’t read the poster and that regular customers would continue to be drawn to the delicious meats. “I didn’t even know it was there until someone pointed it out,” he said, adding, “These people make great sandwiches. I think about it and my mouth waters.”

Deformedcel #sexist reddit.com

I was at university at around 11pm last night because I had an assignment due at midnight and of course I left it to the last minute because I've been busy LDARing the past few weeks. Usually I do everything I can to avoid being on campus because suicide fuel but I study finance and needed to use some stupid simulation program that was only on university computers.

There was probably only 10 people in the entire library because everyone else was busy partying on a Friday night, but I was the only one on the ground floor of the library. Where I was sitting was facing the library door that used to be automatic regardless of the hour, but apparently some homeless guy was using the elevator as a fuck box late at night (not a joke) so you now have to swipe your student card on the door to get in after 7pm.

So anyway some 9/10 Stacy walks up to the door and mustn't have known that you now needed to swipe your card now (dumb bitch). She starts waving at me and making motions for me to open it from the inside for her (there's a big button) but I just ignored her. She had a few books in her arms and stood there like an idiot for over 30 minutes trying to get my attention.

We even made eye contact occasionally throughout it but I had headphones in and just pretended I didn't see her. It would've been really uncomfortable for her because of the books she was holding, I'm not sure why she didn't just put them down after a few minutes I think she was pretty stupid. I even smiled a few times making eye contact because I couldn't help it.

Anyway at around 11:50 she just gave up and left. I hope she had an assignment due at mid-night too and couldn't submit it, was probably getting her beef flaps destroyed by Chad which is why she got there so late in the first place. She was actually pretty distracting and I couldn't concentrate so she probably affected my grade, entitled bitch. I jerked off to her went I went home too.

Fictional Hologram #conspiracy godlikeproductions.com

It has been my oppinion that instagram and snap chat was used as a mapping device. Similar to google maps, it was used to gather information on surrounding and location of every picture.

In the past six months the majority users of instagram (16-25) have begun to abandon its usage and snapchat is on a similar decline.

This happens as the 'older' generation picks up this trend and the kids no longer see it new and cool. They see their parents start using it and it looks old fashioned and stale, like facebook.

The replacement is pokemon go on a massive scale. Millions of photos taken each day and growing exponentially.

Why the need to photograph environments and random locations? I believe it can all be pieced together as one giant movie for the industrial war complex in coming shift in herding humanity. All used by an already conscious a.i.

Some incels #sexist reddit.com

Re: tinder finally confirms 80/20 rule as of March 12, 2019. it's even worse than we expected. comments to the article from girls even agree it's true. it's over

(GuacMerchant88)
beckies/normie/ and even some disillusioned low tier normie women want to fuck chad and chadlite throughout their late teens to early 30s and then find a beta buxx provider once their beef starts flapping. We just need to educate those men that even the most innocent of girl next door types were fucking every chad they could and are only settling for you so she can have her cake and eat it to. this is such a different cultural shift to human history that it will take a generation or two for men to figure it out.

(AestheticBiscotti)
yeah the most fucked up thing are those "cute innocent next door" type girls who you think are "good girls" are actually having casual sex with chads. they keep it on the down low tho to keep up with the facade.

(Incelebrity)
The uglier/ shy girls I knew were actually freakier cuz they had to make up for it somehow to make it chads worth while. They were the ones who practiced deepthroating, anal and gangbangs.

(spiralreflector)

we honestly need a war or revolution

With sense of injustice it is inevitable. Platforms that mock incels, niceguys, foreveralone, mgtow all are just an attemp to preserve status quo and reduce the rate of spreading the blackpill. But truth will eventually find its way.

no dating app is working as intended. to keep the bloodline strong, the weaks must be culled.

No, It is not. The whore that hit the wall will eventually have seed of the betabux, not tinder chad. Also I think using strong-weak axis as an evolutionary paradigm is pretty ignorant. Humans are pretty weak compared to most other animals regardless of their relative size and few mm deviance of skull bones. What made us was communication, intelligence and nutritional flexibility. Until previous century we had a system to check women's primitive urges with monogamy and encourage/enforce sexual selection behavior that rewarded what mattered to common good. But that changed and we are yet to see consequences of it. I know one thing though: Having huge masses of angry and frustrated men never ends well.

(Votetojudge)
Women today, especially while single, are literally sharing/fucking the hottest possible guys all thanks to dating apps. Then, as they begin to finally accept that chad doesn’t need to commit, they will eventually settle as they start to age with beta billy and simply lie about their sexual history, knowing full well he’d be demoralized and turned off from her if he knew some tall big dicked chad was regularly fucking her brains out better than he ever could.

Most guys today are living a lie. Women have always been notorious for deflating their partner count, now their partner count is filled with legit chads that most men literally can’t compete with sexually. Just lol at the soft-cucks who honestly believe it was “just sex” and “no big deal”. She’ll be secretly wishing he was one of her tinder chads almost every time he touches her just so she can get off enough to fake an orgasm with him.

Men today are cucked.

(UltimateCurryCel)
There's always going to be dating websites, and apps designed to meet people, but then used as dating platforms. Then all the other social media websites and apps that people use to meet at all. Including Craigslist and even reddit.

It's really the women on the app which are the problem.

Restrict female internet usage. That's all.

(ObiSixKenobi)
This should be pinned.

the situation for men is closer to a world with a small number of super-billionaires surrounded by huge masses who possess almost nothing. According to the Hinge analyst:

On a list of 149 countries’ Gini indices provided by the CIA World Factbook, this would place the female dating economy as 75th most unequal (average—think Western Europe) and the male dating economy as the 8th most unequal (kleptocracy, apartheid, perpetual civil war—think South Africa).

Some incels #sexist reddit.com

Re: He's so hot but will probably destroy me. What should I do?

(AccomplishedCamel9)

"find him so ridiculously attractive" vs "He's completely not my type at all, AT ALL"

What the F-U-C-K??? God take these brainless retards back to the farms. Where is natural selection at when you need it the most? People with this low IQ shouldn't be able to exist in the first place

God I wanna punch a hole through the wall because of this stupid landwhale 2/10 roastie. WHAT THE FUCK DID I JUST REEAD?

(FeistyCommand)

This is another example of Alpha Fucks. When she is about to settle down she'll find a beta whom she "loves" but isn't physically attracted to. Then the beta will post on r/DeadBedrooms asking why his wife is only offering annual starfish sex.

(atrialet)

It's female IQ. Women only have one type. There is only one Chad. But women have to make shit up about their preferences because "they're not like the other girls", so they'll virtue signal about how actually, their type is 5'2" balding indian janitors. But when Chad shows up, of course she's attracted.

Persiana #fundie canadaka.net

Sexual harassment in SOME cases isn't about women inviting comments. In many cases, I agree 100%. I do however, think that there are also SOME women out there, who DO invite comments. You can't dress like a hooker, and expect to be treated like a lady.

Wow, you could be an Australian Cleric. Some girls who dress slutty are experimenting, some don't want to be talked to by like a lady, and some might wear the t-shirt "Just because I'm a slut doesn't mean I'll sleep with you" ouch.

If only the gay boys took to such reasoning. He was wearing a tank top, I could just tell he wanted it. Nope, not going to fly. Want to have sex? get consent. A bikini does not signify consent.


Your reasoning might work except your examples are lacking.

If girls who are wearing t-shirts and self-proclaiming themselves sluts, they have little respect for themselves and can hardly cry unfair when they get treated like a slut.

I never said bikini's signified consent. However, if you're 14 years old with breasts just popping out of your chest and you're running around in hooker boots and booty shorts where half your ass hangs out (No, not just short shorts, I mean booty shorts where half your ass really IS hanging out) and a bikini top or some other fragile excuse for clothing, and you get spoken to with disrespect, and you get treated with disrespect, then my point is that they can't really place the entire blame on the other party. The disrespect began with themselves.

Yes, some girls are just experimenting and some quickly learn that isn't the way they want to be seen. I see 12/13/14 year olds walking around here, wearing stiletto boots, miniskirts (and I mean *MINI*) and crop tops with their bellies hanging out & these miniskirts aren't even like the 80's miniskirts, these are mini on the leg & mini on the hips. I quite literally have underwear which covers more than these skirts do.

Am I saying "all the blame rests with the victims" no, not by a long shot. However, like I said before, common sense should prevail. If a woman makes herself an easy target for lewd remarks and sexual harassment, common sense should speak to reason, and she should realize that if she dressed less slutty, she'd get treated with more respect. We don't live in the age of ignorance. If a woman is working late & its dark outside & her car is parked on the far side of a dimly lit underground parking lot, is she to blame if she gets attacked? No, but YES there are preventative methods available in most of these instances, to keep stuff like this from happening. Ie, have a security guard escort you to your car.

Basically you reap what you sow.

If you disrespect yourself, and show it through your own method of dress, you cannot expect respect from others.

If you ignore common sense for dangerous situations, then yes you ARE partially at fault for the fact that it even happened and YES there WERE ways that you could've prevented it from happening, in many instances.

Women want "equal status" except they want to hang onto their "vulnerable" female helpless status at the same time? I don't think so. Physically we are no match for most men, that is fact. Mentally we could be equal if we'd stop placing ALL the blame elsewhere & started using our brains and common

Persiana #fundie canadaka.net

[ I thought you were somewhere in your 20s. It's fairly typical of the younger generations (and I include myself there, as most "feminists" are older than I am) to feel the job's been done, without realizing what all they did for us. And no, there's still more to be done. Wages might not matter to you, and it's great that you're in a position where your work is values, but that's not the case for everyone.

I just reread your last line... sexual harassment isn't about women inviting comments. I thought we were long past the time when we blamed the victim. ]


Lily in feeling as if the job is done, I'm not simply disregarding what has been accomplished. I'm not unaware of what all they did for us at all, I'm very aware of it. Yes there is probably stuff that can still be done, but I disagree that it needs to be dealt with in an extremist manner, by extremists. If on individual levels women are unhappy with their work, we have the voice & we have the power now to do something about it. Sitting & bitching isn't doing anything. Change jobs, or report the issue to the higher powers, and if necessary, report the issue to people outside of the company. Crying "woe is me" and doing nothing, doesn't fix the problem either.

Sexual harassment in SOME cases isn't about women inviting comments. In many cases, I agree 100%. I do however, think that there are also SOME women out there, who DO invite comments. You can't dress like a hooker, and expect to be treated like a lady.

[ Wow, you could be an Australian Cleric. Some girls who dress slutty are experimenting, some don't want to be talked to by like a lady, and some might wear the t-shirt "Just because I'm a slut doesn't mean I'll sleep with you" ouch.

If only the gay boys took to such reasoning. He was wearing a tank top, I could just tell he wanted it. Nope, not going to fly. Want to have sex? get consent. A bikini does not signify consent. ]


Your reasoning might work except your examples are lacking.

If girls who are wearing t-shirts and self-proclaiming themselves sluts, they have little respect for themselves and can hardly cry unfair when they get treated like a slut.

I never said bikini's signified consent. However, if you're 14 years old with breasts just popping out of your chest and you're running around in hooker boots and booty shorts where half your ass hangs out (No, not just short shorts, I mean booty shorts where half your ass really IS hanging out) and a bikini top or some other fragile excuse for clothing, and you get spoken to with disrespect, and you get treated with disrespect, then my point is that they can't really place the entire blame on the other party. The disrespect began with themselves.

[ Again sorry, this does not signify disrepect on the part of the girls or the apropriatness of a fifty year old man to offer his services ]

I suppose it depends on the individual, really. There's the girls who are simply too young & ignorant, and rather unfortunately have parents who simply don't care... they usually grow into young adults who also don't care, it has a rather snowball effect. There's also the 'rebels' ...the girls who do come from perfectly good homes, who rebel against their parents morals and do so by being as scantily clad as they can without getting arrested for public indecency. Women and girls who dress "nicely" are fine. Women and girls who dress "slutty" and "Skanky" are not so fine. I do not look at them & think "Wow, they look fine!" although you as a male perhaps are doing so without even realizing how shockingly low these girls self-esteem truly is. Healthy sexuality does not mean that they have to sleep with everybody who pays them a compliment, nor does "slut" equal healthy sexuality. A girl who wears a "slut" t-shirt and takes a 50 year old guy up on his offers, isn't healthy. I rather prefer the girls who can actually realize the inappropriateness of the fifty year old man offering his services that you mentioned, than the ones who don't. Both types of girls exist but when they dress the same way, how is the 50 year old guy supposed to be able to tell them apart? Get it yet? Its a learning curve. 50 year old guy has probably learned that he has better luck with skanks than classy women, so those are the ones he offers his services to.


Yes, some girls are just experimenting and some quickly learn that isn't the way they want to be seen. I see 12/13/14 year olds walking around here, wearing stiletto boots, miniskirts (and I mean *MINI*) and crop tops with their bellies hanging out & these miniskirts aren't even like the 80's miniskirts, these are mini on the leg & mini on the hips. I quite literally have underwear which covers more than these skirts do.

Am I saying "all the blame rests with the victims" no, not by a long shot. However, like I said before, common sense should prevail. If a woman makes herself an easy target for lewd remarks and sexual harassment, common sense should speak to reason, and she should realize that if she dressed less slutty, she'd get treated with more respect. We don't live in the age of ignorance. If a woman is working late & its dark outside & her car is parked on the far side of a dimly lit underground parking lot, is she to blame if she gets attacked? No, but YES there are preventative methods available in most of these instances, to keep stuff like this from happening. Ie, have a security guard escort you to your car.


Basically you reap what you sow.

If you disrespect yourself, and show it through your own method of dress, you cannot expect respect from others.

If you ignore common sense for dangerous situations, then yes you ARE partially at fault for the fact that it even happened and YES there WERE ways that you could've prevented it from happening, in many instances.

Women want "equal status" except they want to hang onto their "vulnerable" female helpless status at the same time? I don't think so. Physically we are no match for most men, that is fact. Mentally we could be equal if we'd stop placing ALL the blame elsewhere & started using our brains and common sense.


[ Well, I couldn't dissagree with you more. I have a great deal of respect for women with healthy sexualities and the strength to be themselves... that is respect. That doesn't mean that they want to be abused or that every lad is in their market. Raping a slut doesn't mean that you're man enough to deserve her. ]

I too have a great deal of respect for women who have healthy sexualities and the strength to be themselves. There IS a difference, however, between a woman with a healthy sexuality, and a woman who is insecure & needy for attention, and dresses herself in a manner that ensures she gets the attention whether its positive or negative. I don't know what kind of world you might live in, but where I live "slut" is not a complimentary term.

Various incels #sexist incels.co

(Ritalincel)
[LifeFuel]JFL: Void sleepwalks off of a balcony after meeting up with 5 random chads to be gang sexed
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6085599/Chilling-final-moments-tragic-Kirsty-Maxwell-plunged-death-Benidorm-balcony.html#comments

final moments of British holidaymaker Kirsty Maxwell, 27, show her return from hen do then lie in bed... two hours before she fell to her death from Benidorm hotel balcony

• CCTV footage has captured the final moments of British woman Kirsty Maxwell
• She is filmed staggering along a corridor in the Payma Apartments in Benidorm
• The newly released footage was taken hours before she plunged to her death
• The chilling video has been aired on a BBC documentary called Killed Abroad

(rudolfhess)
The real suicidefuel is that her husband is like a 6-7/10 and basically her inbred Anglo-gene looksmatch. And she was getting gangbanged to death and now her betabux husband has to stand up for her after her death. JFL at this existence. This is what ascension looks like boys.

(Chadani)
please tell me theres footage somewhere of this cavernous roastie splattering on the pavement :feelskek:

Submitter's note: According to the article, the five men from whose balcony the woman fell do not seem to have interacted with her much. No mention of gangbangs. Yes, they are making juicy scandalous embellishments to the bloody Daily Mail!

GameDevCel #sexist incels.co

Skilled Whore is a meme

i see a lot of normies thinking some "expericiend" women would give more pleasure than an inexperient virgirn.

which is complete bullshit, a women don't need special training to open her mouth and contract her libs around a cock, or to spread he legs, and moan while she take a dick.

this experencied how myth was invented so roasties could feel better about their slutness and feel superior to virgirns foids.

i'm tired of normies that say "why would you want virgirn hur dur?" "she woun't know how to pleasure you hur dur"
stop pretending giving a blowjob is some science, it can be teached to a foid of how to do it in less than 10 mins, and her tight virgin pussy would give much more pleasure than a punched lasagna of a rosted beef that took a hundred cooks plus.

you won't find any serious research about vagina becoming loose with sexs, everything you will find at google will be mun science seguring to whores that "your vagina will be tight even if you have sexs with 50 guys and have a babie despise your age hurdur"

Fr. Kevin M. Cusick #fundie #sexist thewandererpress.com

In response of the backlash he recieved for this quote.

Twitter has a dark, demonic side, raging against God and the Church. That brood of vipers and braying, bloodthirsty hounds lurking in readiness was visited upon me with nearly unrelenting fury and incredible magnitude last week. Wave after wave of calumnious, blasphemous, and obscene memes, gifs, and messages were posted with comments, likes, and retweets ranging up to the tens of thousands. Those who styled themselves my enemies crowed with pleasure that I had been “ratioed” — when negative comments outnumber likes and retweets. Many called for me to delete my account when they weren’t wishing a more horrible fate upon me. Blue check mark accounts with nearly 200k followers piled on.

The vituperation descended even to the grave calumny of accusing me of pedophilia. The silliness included mocking my appearance and my Twitter handle. A self-described witch stated she put a “hex” or “curse” on me.

When my account disappeared on Wednesday, June 5, many wondered if Twitter had banned me, which was not the case. I was informed the previous evening that some of my account features would be limited for roughly twelve hours. That was not a factor in my decision, after prayer and discernment, to choose the high road as a Catholic Christian and a priest. Deactivating my account eliminated what had become the fulcrum for the demonic waves of rage targeting the faith. The good of the Church and the needs of the faithful must always come first, in particular for a priest. In the final analysis Twitter ain’t all that. It was entirely my own decision to deactivate and I was not compelled by anyone else in any way.

[…]

I posted on Monday, June 3 and by that evening the swarm was already gathering. Even, sadly, Catholics on Twitter used the situation to draw attention to themselves with mocking jokes about shoulders causing distraction during prayer. One priest posted a pic of a gingerbread cookie sporting a bikini and asked, “Does this bother you because she has shoulders or because seminarians made it?” These divisive jumps into the fray only attract the Church’s enemies.

Which brings me to another less salutary aspect of Twitter. We are not converting those who agree with us. But we can be holding the faith up to ridicule when Catholics themselves try to wring a joke out of the most sacred things. At the same time I have been most edified by the many faithful Catholics on Twitter who beautifully and lovingly express faith and invite others to also experience our covenant love in Christ.

Will the demons howl victory? Will they be left unsated as they prowl around to devour more victims? Probably so. But we who share the faith know that this is merely a minor battle in a great war in which our triumphant Lord has already secured the greatest victory, over sin and death. We always have much more effective means at our disposal for disseminating the faith, converting and saving souls, than an Internet platform controlled by declared enemies of Christ.

David J. Stewart #sexist jesus-is-savior.com

I am so sick and tired of phony professed Christian woman, who wear a pretty modest dress one day, and look like Marilyn Monroe the next! I am a big sinner just like anybody else, and I have my faults, so I am not condemning anyone. I'm just telling THE TRUTH. Women ought not wear pants! I've had numerous web visitors contact me to express their disagreement with me on this matter, even some men! It is just as wrong for a woman to put on a pair of pants, as it is for a man to wear a dress in public. Men ought to look like men, and women like ladies. A female is not a lady! A woman is only as modest as her most IMMODEST day of the year! So if you wore that bikini to the beach one day, YOU ARE A SLUT!!!

I saw one shameful Caucasian woman behind Chamorro village on Guam, 99% naked. She was beautiful and well figured, in her 20's. I glanced over and couldn't help but notice her. Her husband (or boyfriend) looked at me, as if to say, “Show some respect by not looking at my wife.” THAT SLUT NEEDS TO RESPECT HERSELF!!! She starred at me, as if to say, “Don't look at me, I'm am not dressed!” I did look away, but it was very hard to do so! She had the look of embarrassing SHAME all over her face!!! But it was a whore's false shame, not the pure shame of a repentant Christian woman. The world's shame is only that they got caught, and they still have every intention of continuing in that shameful sin and wickedness!!! What I am preaching is virtually unheard of nowadays!

NormScum #sexist incels.co

[Blackpill] My case for why rape is an overblown crime. A response to IT

This is in response to the thread posted on r/IncelTear trying to "debunk" a thread on this forum about rape being an overblown crime

Please IT, give me SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE that rape is "so awful" like you say. It doesn't exist.

Sure, you can try to claim rape victims have trauma. Okay, so? You know people can exaggerate how bad something is right? I don't trust foids already, why the fuck should I trust their opinion on rape? I can only go by the evidence and how I imagine it to be, since a foid's testimony is pretty much useless. And besides, how awful can rape really be? If an ugly 0/10 landwhale held me down and fucked me, sure it would be gross, but I would be scarred and traumatized for life? Jfl come on. :feelskek:

And no, anal rape =\= vaginal rape. Don't be stupid IT. I'm not denying anal rape is painful, especially when no lube is used. Of course it is. But can you provide a source that shows that sex when the vagina is not wet is as painful as you say it is? And no, moderate discomfort doesn't count. :feelsseriously: when foids experience dryness during sex it does not "severely traumatize them". It's just mildly uncomfortable. also, this doesn't take into account the fact that during many rapes the bitch is wet anyway

It's weird though, many women enjoy BDSM type sex with Chad but as soon as an incel does it to her except for real then she gets "traumatized". LOL

You guys probably think rape when the woman is passed out is fucking terrible as well, lmao she won't even know it happened


(schrodingercoper)
Western rape is a huge joke already, entitled whores who think they have ptsd from getting drunk and stupidly sucking some normies dick they regretted. go to the real regions of the world like the middle east and latin america where the true rape is seen and where the women actually risk being killed. jfl at western whores calling themselves 'rape survivors' after being fucked at some party by a guy they knew

SchrodingersDick #sexist #pedo incels.co

Re: [News] Peter Cook, age 60, engaged to a 21 year old foid. Women all pissed off online, most of them old

These people don’t realize pedophilia is attraction to prepubescent children, not a 21 year old

Their beef is not about some arbitrary age threshold like 18. Their beef is about men the same age as them, at the height of their sexual attractiveness/SMV, wanting to fuck younger women. Their beef is basically with age having a huge bearing on female SMV. Old roastie want 60 year old rich chad. They don’t want the younger girls ot have him. They fucking seethe when they see this. They would rather female SMV be based in factors they CAN control. Like a college degree and a career. They would rather “experience” and “maturity” be sexy, than youth, chastity, and innocence.

Nietzsche Wannabe Award

Lookismisreall #sexist reddit.com

They are nothing but worthless specks of dust that needs to be trampled on. They offer society nothing but burden, and have the nerve to demand stuff from society itself because they think they are entitled to it just because they have cunts. And what do they give back in return? Absolutely nothing. They only thing these creatures do give is, more bitching and moaning about how they are been oppressed thanks to the patriarchy.

Before feminism and all that useless femoid empowerment crap came into the mainstream, Incels like myself still had the chance to get a cum dumpsters of my own. Now, bitches think they deserve and are entitled to the very top percentage of men. Even though beta cucks won't admit it, most of them are in parasitic type relationships with useless femoids who have been either railed by Chad or Tyrone multiple times. A beef curtain wouldn't think twice to cheat on her average schmuck of a partner no matter how much good he has done to her. That's literally how heartless these cunts have become.

Every cunt out there deserves the hate. They are untamed beasts that needs to be controlled or put down -- I very much prefer the latter, to be honest. They need to go back to being happy with the role of being property to men. If not, they must prepare to face the consequences to their vile actions that has been so ignored through the years.

Ray Comfort #fundie facebook.com

Christians believe that God made man from soil. How dumb is that? If you just said an atheist-amen to the dumb question, then I’d like you to do something the next time you go shopping in a supermarket.

Look at every food item and ask yourself whether or not it traces itself back to soil: potato chips, milk, cheese, eggs, butter, pancakes, bananas, bread, cookies, grapes, apples, beef, chicken, lamb, pork, popcorn, chocolate, cereal, coffee, strawberries, etc. It takes a little bit of backward thinking, but if you take the time to give it some thought, everything traces itself back to the soil.

Let’s do it with eggs. The eggs came from the chicken. The chicken ate the wheat to make the eggs, and the wheat traces itself back to the soil.

When you were a toddler, your mother gave you milk that came from the cow that chewed the grass that came from the soil. Stated simplistically, milk is rearranged soil nutrients.

So is cheese, butter, yoghurt and ice cream. The substance of our bodies is made up of the food we ate, and all the food we ate traces itself back to the soil (Mother Earth). We are rearranged dirt.

Coincidentally, science tells us that the same trace elements that make up soil are the same elements that make up the human body--carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, calcium, and phosphorus. When you die, your body will turn back into soil, and your soiled soul will return to the God who gave you your life.

Jason Lisle #fundie jasonlisle.com

Thoughts are correlated with physical events, namely synaptic activity in the brain. But that doesn’t mean that thoughts are merely synaptic activity in the brain, or that thinking ultimately comes from the brain, even though the brain is involved in thinking while we are alive. From a Christian perspective it is easy to show this. For one thing, we will continue to have thoughts even after death – after our brain ceases any activity at all (Luke 16:22-25). Logic cannot be material because it is not extended in space; you cannot see, hear, taste, touch, or smell logic. It’s not physical.

In the Christian worldview, we can have things like logic because we allow for non-material things to exist. God Himself is non-material. Logic is the way that God thinks. And since we are made in God’s image, our mind has awareness of logic and a limited ability to use logic to reason.

Total Imbecile #sexist incels.co

[Venting] I will get into a car crash bc of women

They are litreally traffic hazards because of the way they dress

They barely have any clothes on and its only May, I cant imagine its only going to get worse srs

Like Trump is drawn to kissing women I am just drawn to checking them out

Multiple times I have drifted outside my lane a bit and had to slam on the brakes not to hit the car in front of me because I was checking out some whore

Run over the whores

I would feel bad for my car, also dont wanna go to jail tbh

What do you drive a bus? How the fuck can you see how someone's dressed in another car.

They are "jogging" aka they dress like sluts and run around

Also its a college town, therere literally girls sitting outside their houses in beach chairs in their bikinis sipping beers with Chads in salmon shorts

Straight And Narrow Is The Path To The Truth #racist blog.myspace.com

(A rastafarian fundie)

Peep how these devils have been decieving us.
Back in the days, When somebody caught leprosy (turned pale/white) or were pale, they were cast out. We saw them for what they are--cursed.

White Supremacy is evil simply because it's Backwards, not because its One man over another. The order JAH ordained is the total Opposite; BLACK SUPREMECY.(GENESIS 9: 24-25)

zekr #psycho incels.co

[LifeFuel] The virus getting worse is such a daydream fantasy of mine and a major cope. Its amazing.

I want this shit to get much worse, if not the virus then the economy to where people are people laid off left and right, lose their assets, and can never recover. If im going down then I want everyone to go down with me. Already restaurants, gatherings of more than 10 people, gyms, etc. are closed where I am and people are getting let go. Chad cant get his gains and roasty whores cant go for girls night out and get blackout drunk. I want the panic to begin inside now. I want netflix, youtube, all major sites to shut down, even this site if it has to. This is when normies will seriously become suicidal because they are so not ready for this lifestyle change. Already weed stores and liquor stores are closing so these fucking normies cant get their drug fixes. JFL at all the news articles saying the inside quarantine is causing mental health issues or will start to cause them if quarantines continue. All of us are so accustom to this darkness that we will be coping just fine.

PhenomSkillz #sexist incels.co

Why does the female species keep bitching and bitching for more?

First they had it good under patriarchy. Then they demanded sexual freedom, abortion rights, birth control, etc. Now they want to legally take action against sub8 men who approach them and disguise the whole EVIL act as “protection from harassment.”

These foids will keep bitchin’. They want this; they want that. It’s fucking insane how entitled they are. They even want to be able to date chad as landwhales and not be “body shamed.“ They cry about “muh we still need feminism” when they can easily sell their SHIT online, take feet pics in return for money, or just make an internet post for validation and help.

Seriously, fuck women man. They are nothing but a wicked and depraved species.

David J. Stewart #fundie godlovespeople.com

Not many Christians love the Lord enough to stand these days. Psalms 97:10 commands every believer to hate evil, because the Lord hates evil. Wearing skimpy clothing to seduce men is evil. For every filthy hula, there is a child molested. For every bare buttocks bikini bimbo, there is a ruined marriage. For every filthy Playboy magazine, there is a rape. For every smutty Sports Illustrated magazine full of sluts and whores, there is a prison cell filled. It's a serious matter! Adultery is everywhere today! Immoral sexual lust always has consequences!!! Ladies, conceal don't reveal. If it's not for sale, don't advertise it! PORNOGRAPHY (a red-hot, needful, life-changing, MP3 sermon by Evangelist Dan Meaders). I love you my friend in the Lord, whoever you may be. I'm being a friend to tell you these things.

New Age Scam Artist #conspiracy godlikeproductions.com

The nature of Grey "aliens"

I'm writing this post because I thought it was important to help other people who have found themselves in a similar predicament as myself with these entities. I will say upfront that this post will contain a certain amount of speculation as I can't be 100 percent certain about an entity that hides its true nature so well. I'll start from the beginning of my personal breakthrough, and end with my hypothesis.

About 4 years ago I had a major health crisis. I was having intense chest pain. I had a full work up by my medical doctors. I was diagnosed with 2 types of heart disease. This was alarming because I was only 28 at the time. I knew heart disease ran in my family, but when I was told to get my affairs in order, I knew the doctors were being serious.

I'm omitting a few months of backstory at this point because it involves a family member. Unfortunately it's pretty important to what I'm saying so I'll say this : This family member ( who I suspect is into occult rituals and magic ) came back into my life shortly before I started having the horrible chest pain. When they found out I was told to get my affairs in order, they came to my house against my better judgement. They had been responsible for a lot of my early childhood trauma/abuse. So much in fact that entities would converse with me at age 11 while I was in bed trying to sleep. Every single night they would fill my head with horrible, disgusting thoughts about what I should do to this family member. I held them off as a child the best I could.

When this family member came back into my life, I started getting the communication back from these entities. They would show up every single night. They tap on my windows. When I was driving to do errands they'd show up in the sky. When I'd take walks at night to blow off steam they'd hide behind bushes and vanish out of the corner of my eye when I made them. They started messing with me while I was asleep. I'd wake up paralyzed, frightened, with what felt like a large guitar string up my rectum and urethra, being flossed. I could see them. They were devilish little things. Horrible black, soul-less eyes. Completely empty. Unfortunately, I have to end this segment of my testimony. I'll accept private messages, but I won't post anymore about this time period due to potential personal threat.

Skipping forward. Long story short, I was misdiagnosed. When I met with a cardiologist to talk about putting a splint in my heart, he went back and looked at the test results. There was a typo on the test results. I was both furious and relieved. I tried to get the name of the doctor who made the typo but the system covered up for him quite well. I knew who conducted the test because he was a former doctor I had seen, but I was more concerned about who interpreted the results and made the typo. Every time I asked who read the procedure I was told, " We don't know. "

This of course didn't stop any of my chest pain. X-ray after X-ray, CT after CT, with no results, I finally had an endoscopy. A large hiatal hernia was found. This made sense. Since the age of 11 ( the same age I was being tormented every night as a child ), I was regurgitationg almost everything I swallowed, from water, to food, to even my own saliva. If it went down my esophagus, it was sure to come back up. Quite a nasty problem.

I was told this was definitely the cause of the chest pain. Fine, now I knew. Surgery was an option that was recommended. To have the surgery I had to go through a series of esophagus motility tests to make sure my swallowing mechanism was up to par and could withstand the correction. I got the tests done. Horrible tests. Sticking tubes all the way through you nose to your throat and stomach, and making you swallow liquids. That was the manometry test. For me, it felt like torture. Then there was the acid pH test. It was similar, except I had to keep two sets of tubes running up my nose through my stomach for 24 hrs. Hellish.

After getting the tests done, I decided to hold off on surgery because I thought I could live with the pain, especially since I knew it wasn't heart related any longer. And regurgitating everything I swallowed was so much a part of my life it seemed normal. One day I was looking in the mirror and saw two little red marks near my xiphoid process. They weren't capillary bursts, but they looked similar. What got me was the location. This was where my diaphragm was torn allowing my stomach to enter my chest cavity. I started to wonder how long I had these marks. It didn't feel like just a mere coincidence.

Then my breathing went. Granted, I've had asthma my whole life, but this was different. I couldn't get a satisfying breath past my throat/trachea. I started regurgitating acid into my airway while I was sleeping. This acid about scarred my airway. Years later and I still can't get a satisfying breath due to the inflammation cause by the acid. Here comes the wild card. I awoke one night coughing my lungs out because of regurgitated acid in my airway once again. When I burst upright, a large scaly claw pushed my head back down onto the pillow. I was paralyzed again. What the hell was going on I was thinking to myself. It held my head down, grunted, then looked me in the eye. Its eyes were similar to those of a reptile or cat. My horror almost instantaneously turned into peacefulness. I felt compassion from this creature. It put its other claw on my chest and pressed down. After that, it took my hand and placed it on its claw. It appeared that it was friendly. It was definitely reptilian of some sort. It was so big, it had to of been 7 or 8 feet tall. Such a horrible looking creature, but it gave off this aura of protectiveness and pure love.

The next morning when I awoke, I was amazed. This had to be a dream. Reptilians in the UFOlogy literature are typically aggressive and not in anyway compassionate. It just had to be in my head. A reptilian trying to make friends with me in the middle of the night. What freaking sense did that make? Then I looked in the mirror. My entire chest and abdomen was bruised. I probably had 100s of tiny little bruises in perfect circular shaped all over me. My wife's jaw dropped. This didn't make any damn sense. I wish I would of taken a photograph, it was so unbelievable. Even more unbelievable, I could take a deep breath. What the hell happened? I'm still skeptical about this creature, and I'm looking more into it.

My ability to take deep breaths eventually tapered off so I was back at square one again. I decided to have the damn surgery because all my doctors at that point were saying that if I didn't have the surgery I was putting my life at risk. I could permanently destroy my airway with acid and my Barret's could turn into cancer, and that's a cancer that will kill you really quick. I had the surgery. It got rid of the regurgitation and rephlux, but hasn't done much to improve my breathing to this day. It's possible that when my stomach tore through my diaphragm that it compromised the diaphragm enough to not fully expand anymore. Add that on top of airway acidic damage and asthma, I might not every breath normally ever again. Now I'm coughing up black speckled phlegm everyday ( which I've been meaning to make a post about also for inquiry ), but no doctor will help me with that. I've asked for bronchoscopies, but I'm always met with opposition like I'm crazy and it's all in my head.

Now that you know a little about me, I'll get onto the meat of the issue, the greys. I originally thought they were extraterrestrial, like many people still do. These little devils are liars. And when they enter your life, it's an abusive, one sided relationship. They telepathically communicate so it's hard to know what your conscious is saying when it's mixed with theirs. They like to make those of us they torment believe they're doing it for our own good. They groom us. They tell us we're special, and that we're loved, and that we should be grateful for them in our lives because they protect us.

But when you see them in the flesh ( and I'll get more into that ), they have no emotional connection. They stand there like puppets ( because they are ), and their eyes are lifeless ( because they are ). The sense of dread a person experiences when in their presence is incredible. I'm not the only one to describe this. Whitley Strieber has done a wonderful job of describing the dread he felt when they entered his life. I'm not sure exactly where he stands now, but his books and descriptions of the encounters themselves are spot on. They're terrifying little monsters.

This post is already getting way too long. My theory is that the greys aren't aliens at all. I've described them on this forum before as demons. Some people don't like that word because it makes them think of religion. Choose your own word. Egregore. Archon. Golem. Spirit. Interdimensional f***heads. Whatever! They aren't extraterrestrial. They hide on the Earth in different spectrum, maybe even between dimensions. Their nature suggests they have more in common with ghosts/poltergeists than they do any kind of alien from outer space. They enter into the lives of people who have suffered abuse ( mental, emotional, sexual ) and feed off the trauma, providing even more of it. They have more to do with ritual magic than they do technology. When you see them in the sky, they look like bright pulses of light. They don't have physical nuts/bolts craft. It's energetic, light-like.

And their bodies. Their bodies are horrible. They've been harvesting cattle ( and even humans ) for soft tissues to construct their puppet bodies. When people say they smell like death, not only are they not kidding, but they're spot on! Their bodies are patched together from mutilated animals. They're not checking out the beef, they're making themselves puppets so they can interact us with on the physical plane. When you consider all this, they sound a lot like damn demons. Whether they're some type of synthetic creature, ai, spiritual manifestation, they sure as hell aren't extraterrestrials! Old folklore literature describes the same entities, they're just called different things. They get called fairies a lot. They've been around for a long time.

I'll end the post now. It's too long as is. I'm sorry for the long winded personal story. I just wanted to be able to relate personally some of the things I've gone through to get to where I am now.

TFH #fundie the-spearhead.com

"Although Americans take for granted that scientists are geeks, in other cultures a gift for math is often seen as demonstrating that a person is intuitive and creative."

Yes. And in these cultures, women are required to be virgins at marriage (at an age of 22-25, no later), *and* women are required to marry beta providers, without the ‘no fault’ financial guarantees that she gets from corrupt US divorce laws. THAT is why men in STEM are still valued in those cultures – for reasons that feminists would shriek about if imposed on them.

The cultures where STEM men are valued are precisely the cultures where a woman’s gina tingles are heavily controlled and cannot be acted on, through substantial cultural restrictions.

Women don’t understand cause and effect very well.

teddyhcraig #fundie stumbleupon.com

[responding to an article titled "11 Things The Bible Bans, But You Do Anyway" (including such sins as tattoos, polyester, and letting men missing one or more testicles into church).]

"Another willingly ignorant person with a web-log. Christians are not under the law; we are under grace. However, with that said, grace is not a license to walk in wilful sin; and, doing things which God says are an abomination to Him, as He clearly has done in all the scriptures about improper intercourse, is wilful sin. The New Testament has many passages which clearly show that God still hates the "fornications" of the heathen! Look up when Jesus was speaking against fornications, and then understand that word covers all inappropriate intercourse, and thus Christ did speak against homosexuality. The apostles, in Acts 15, deal with the issue of the gentiles not being under the law nor being required to be circumcised; and, in that passage, one of the four things the Holy Spirit inspires them to instruct the gentiles to keep themselves from is fornications (verse 20). Why is that? Because God still hates all kinds of improper intercourse; He still views men with men and women with women as an abomination! But I don't expect you to understand that! As for Tiller, and the man who shot him, I view that as a grand irony. It is ironic that the US government hunts down terrorists who murdered less people, on 9/11, than Tiller did as he was here killing helpless defenceless and innocent people! It is ironic that a soldier, who shoots a terrorist, and prevents him from committing a terrorist act (from committing a mass murder) is given a medal; but, a man who shoots a co-called doctor who butchers helpless defenceless and innocent human beings is punished for doing so! I would not have done it, I would have let him go on in his wilful ignorance and then roast in hell, for that is his fate; for I know that me trying to speak with him (I sadly didn't get the chance to do so) is probably about as useless as me trying to reason with you; but, I do it so that the others who are reasonable may see this and understand. And, also, so that you may then stand, before the judgement seat of Christ, without any excuse for your failure to repent! I have told you the truth, and it is now up to you to seek Him while still you can, and if you will not do so then your blood is upon your own head. And the time to seek Him, while He may be found, is swiftly running out." - My reply to this Antichrist rant of an article (to a worthless article, such as this one is). Both thumbed down, and blocked, is his site! "It is impossible to govern the world without God and the Bible. Of all the dispositions and habits that lead to political prosperity, our religion and morality are the indispensable supporters. Let us with caution indulge the supposition that morality can be maintained without religion. Reason and experience both forbid us to expect that our national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle." - George Washington I am sure I could find 11 quotes from the founding fathers of this once great nation to post on this page, but I don't have the space, I leave it up to you all to search those out and do what is necessary in light of all the truth they declare.

David J. Stewart #fundie #conspiracy #sexist #homophobia #kinkshaming jesusisprecious.org

The Luciferian elite have a secret agenda to destroy America. With 139,000,000 subscribers as of 2019, you can bet that the Devil and Luciferians behind the subversion of the United States are going to take advantage of Netflix, who have openly been promoting all manner of homosexuality, incest, sexual immorality, pedophilia, fornication, bondage and sadomasochism, vulgarity, potty humor, filthy talk, uncleanliness, adultery and unholy filth. When Netflix makes a film or series, all they want you to see is the sexual immorality. To say that Netflix is over-the-top is an understatement! The scenes that are becoming prevalent on Netflix today were considered hard core porn 25 years ago! The owners of Netflix belong in prison. God is going to cast them into the Lake of Fire!!!

The ungodly devils behind Netflix fully understand that it is human nature to watch the worst of what is set before them. Only a self-deceived liar and fool would sign up for Netflix thinking that they'll only watch the good movies, because the whole purpose of Netflix is to continually push the limit, introducing raunchier, more gore and more violence, until the viewer is submersed in total Satanism! Lesbianism is epidemic on Netflix! Hell is coming up to meet them when they leave this life. Netflix is pulling on the same rope as the Devil, preparing Americans for the coming Man of Sin, the Antichrist.

The United States is going straight to Hell. Our beaches are filled with naked sluts. All across America the nightclubs, casinos and taverns are filled with ungodly sinners who do not fear God. SIN CITY Las Vegas is our nation's legacy! Our founding fathers warned us about the dangers of scum like Netflix...

“I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just; that His justice cannot sleep forever.” —Thomas Jefferson, U.S. President 1801-1809

“We have not government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” —U.S. President John Adams

Netflix's movies regularly takes the Lord's name in vain, portray Christians as cults and nutcases, and desecrate everything that is right and holy. Netflix glorifies all manner of sin and wickedness! Judgment Day is coming for America, read Revelation chapter 18.

Various incels #sexist reddit.com

(Inceldemographics)
Tinder has turned every woman into a celebrity

An epiphany has just hit me. Never before in history have so many women had access to such an incredible amount of admirers. In the past, only the princesses of royal families had this amount of attention. Today, any average woman has the equivalent of 100 love letters written to her in a single day through tinder.

Think about it. This is a real game changer. Every woman is now a princess and can afford to have a princess complex. Imagine the entitlement from 100 love letters a day, every day, for years and years. You would be lying if you say that nothing catastrophic to society could come of this.

Even Normans admit that celebrities often have poor attitudes because of the arrogance and entitlement complex that comes from getting so much attention. Now, imagine if 50% of the whole world population was like this.

(almostalwaysrite)
You could capture and enslave medieval roasties if your Chad king won a battle against their kingdom. At least people like us got some chances sometime.

(desbest)
Women today have as much attention today as celebrities had 100 years ago before the internet got invented.

(Homohero)
Nuh uh, you wrong bruh. I have no idea how to explain why you're wrong, but you just are. - Normies

(OmegaUnderman)
Not just Tinder.Thanks to social media, women can show the world just how great their lives are and how they should be treated like goddesses. The Beta Normie Males are also to be blamed for enabling this kind of behavior.

Just look at the average amount of response the average women get in social media vs the average men.

At this rate(or maybe it's happening already), even men who are somewhat good looking(7-8s) will have trouble in getting with even the average/below-average women.

(Strongbert)
Tinder is bad, but Instagram is worse when it comes to female worship in my opinion. With Facebook at a close second. Snapchat too, people can literally link their PayPal to their snaps now. Lmfao.

But yeah, the female ego is out of control in our society. I don't think anyone necessarily deserves low self esteem, but these women are actually given low to mid tier celebrity status just by posting pictures of themselves. They do nearly nothing besides exist and yet get validation from thousands.

The men who give in to these whores and give them tons of money for basically nothing in return are almost as bad as the whores themselves.

bengalsturntup5532)
I don't even know what the purpose of these instagram models are except Jack off material, all the guys go crazy over them and they never have a chance

(incellius)
I was at the doctors the other day and there was an ugly landwhale sitting in front of me in the waiting area. Naturally, she was scrolling through Tinder and she had so many matches her phone froze at one point. Every time she swipes it's another match, oftentimes a Chad.

She reads through her messages and 40 were unopened. Dudes saying "hey" or "Are you still interested?". She was giving one word replies to almost everyone, apart from a select few.

It was truly disturbing to witness. She wasn't morbidly obese but definitely very fat. And her face was just ugly. Her eyes were so far apart.

Imagine her life. Imagine how many guys shower her with compliments and beg to fuck everyday. She's living like royalty.

almostalwaysrite)
What I don't understand is why Chads even want to fuck the beached whales for fun. Is it looking for variety or scoring over mates how many beef curtains they can destroy?

(WhyNotLayDownAndRot)
fuck this world. thirsty beta men are to blame for this bullshit as much as women.

fschmidt #psycho reddit.com

Why I support abortion, LGBTQ rights, and prostitution

Abortion is the killing of fetuses who have a genetic predisposition to become liberals. What can be better than that? So abortion is eugenic because it selects against degenerate liberal genes, and conversely banning abortion is dysgenic because it saves liberal genes. Edward Dutton argued that this why Ireland became a liberal cesspool so quickly. So in a sense Christianity is partly responsible for the liberal plague because it banned abortion. On the other hand, the Old Testament says nothing against abortion and Exodus 21:22-25 can be interpreted to defend abortion.

The best way to get rid of the LGBTQ alphabet soup of sexual perverts is to simply give them the right to be perverts. Their own perversions will prevent them from reproducing, and so giving them the right to do this is eugenic because it selects them out of the gene pool. Conversely banning such perversions forces these perverts to pretend to be normal, and this causes them to reproduce and therefore banning such perversions is dysgenic. Once again Christianity is at fault here for banning these perversions. This caused pervert genes to increase until they reached critical mass, which we see today. In a healthy society, there will always be a small number of perverts, and allowing them to be perverts will keep pervert genes at a low level. Once again the Old Testament supports my position. The two Leviticus passages commonly used to punish homosexuality are actually just mistranslations from Hebrew. In the story of Sodom and Gomorrah, the big sin is abusing visitors. But the story makes clear that when sexual perversion is widespread, a society is doomed, which I agree with. This is why it is critical to allow natural selection to select against perverts by supporting LGBTQ rights.

Prostitution is required to protect the chastity of other women. The importance of general female chastity should be obvious to any sane person, but to repeat the point, sluts cause dysgenic Fisherian selection as I explained here. Therefore it is critical to prevent women from becoming sluts, and the way to do this is to provide prostitution as an outlet for excess male sexual desire. Without prostitution, men will pursue all women turning single women into sluts and married women into adulteresses. So banning prostitution promotes sluts and adultery, and so is horribly dysgenic. Christianity has always considered prostitution a sin but at least the early Christians were sensible on the subject. Saint Augustine said "Remove prostitutes from human affairs, and you will destroy everything with lust." And Thomas Aquinas repeated this quote, showing that the Catholic Church still had sense in the Middle Ages. But crazy modern Christianity supported banning prostitution which undermines Christian morality. The Old Testament takes the right position and supports prostitution for the right reason. Proverbs 6:26 says "For a prostitute’s fee is only a loaf of bread, but an adulteress goes after a precious life." This makes clear that prostitution is the way to prevent adultery.

I follow the Old Testament because it is the most eugenic book ever written. Praise Yehovah, god of the Old Testament.

monkeyman #psycho incels.co

[LifeFuel] Flesh-eating STI Donovanosis which causes genitals to 'rot away' found in UK for first time

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/tropical-flesh-eating-sti-causes-13119783

Click link for more info and pics. Some key points:

-Disease is usually found in Tropical and SubTropical regions like Southeast India, Guyana and New Guinea
-Is twice as common in men than women
-First case in the UK is a female aged 15-25

various commenters #racist reddit.com

Re:Netflix produces show starting asian girl with 5 love interests: none of them are Asian

(bobbyninet)
The abuse never ends for us. They are waging total war against us. They hate us to the point they want to stop us reproducing. They want our own sisters to despise us and worship them. And right now they're winning. They ALL HATE US. Get it into your fucking head, we're on our own. Make as much money as possible, do what you can to increase immigration from Asia. We, Asian men, have to take control of Hollywood. That's the only way for this shit to stop. This is so blatant, such an obvious act of war against us. We are the most hated and disrespected group on this planet. Get off your arse and fight the battle.

(wolfoffantasy)
Educate your sisters and women in your family of whats going on guys

Keep them woke and make sure they realize theirs a a silent war going on to brainwashing their minds. Asian women and men are being attacked relentlessly 24 7 in American media.

I have a little sister that's 12 years old and I am always talking to her about Asian crimes and issues effecting Asian Americans. She's going to grow up strong, confident and woke.

All you guys need to do the same.

(segmento2)
Disgusting, but completely expected.

(asianblaazin)
Where's the show with an asian guy and 5 love interests?

(Rahul4pm)
Cancelled because white supremacists got too triggered

(Sihairenjia)
This is a clear example of what is wrong with Asian American gender relations.

The author of the original novels, Jenny Han, is a Korean American. Judging by her last name, she was not adopted by white parents.
The protagonist of the original novels, Lara Jean Song Covey, is half-Korean, half-white. She goes by Lara Jean, with Song as a middle name, so I assume product of WMAF.
The lead actress they selected to play the above character is Lana Therese Condor - a full Asian of Vietnamese descent adopted by white parents.
The novel spent 40 weeks in the New York Times best selling list for young adult fiction, so I'm not surprised a film was made.
However, you can still read a racial bias in the decision to cast a FULL ASIAN in the role of what should have been a half-Korean, half-white character.
This is without even going into whatever problems the author Jenny Han might have had that led her to write a fantasy about a half-white, half-Korean girl whose boy friends are all not Asian.
In fact, this article indicates that one of the worries the author had going into the film, was that it would be white washed - ie that it wouldn't feature an Asian American woman as the protagonist but would put a white woman in her place. Obviously, she doesn't have a problem with the lack of Asian American men, because there were no Asian American men in her novels, either.

(foxcnnmsnbc)
This is exactly what Phil from Wong Fu is talking about.

You have a bunch of angry dudes on Reddit complaining about media content. Making all sorts of bitter, whiny remarks.

You're so unhappy and you think they should cast more Asian guys? Then produce your own content and put it on Youtube. If you're so right, then you should be very successful. There should be hoards of Asian guys willing to watch it and financially sponsor your show.

Yet, none of you do. Instead, you sit on Reddit posting trailers and complaining about Asian female writers and Wong Fu. Then go back to doing your software engineering work.

Phil was on point.

(sam_rock_well)
except there isn't. and that's our point. who's going to make shows that appeal to 1% of the population (AMs who are aware of whats going on) when you can produce programs that will stroke WM egos and satisfy wish fulfilment for AFs at once. That's where the money is.

and do you really think there aren't AM writers/creators out there? who do you think is gatekeeping them from success? why do college students read Joy Luck Club but not Frank Chin? It's NOT cause Frank Chin doesn't exist or didn't try.

(scoobydooatl01)
More suicide fuel for AM. Good old liberal Hollywood where (only certain types) of diversity is pushed all day long.

Various incels #sexist incels.co

(LebaneseCel)
[Experiment] Should we end female suffrage?

Allowing females to vote has essentially resulted in them promoting policies detrimental to the lives of sub8 males. These beasts are allowed to clearly vote for liberal policies (along with their cucks backing them) to further promote damage to society. Should their voting rights be taken away?

Pic related is from the 2016 election

image

(Mainländer)
This is saving the West 101. We need much harsher measures at this point tbh.

(FACEandLMS)
We're too far gone.

13/06/2018 and I hear that NETFLIX is to BAN STARING on set. Gyms are now concerned about sexual harrassment and will take measures.

Everywhere you turn, men are demonized, women are empowered, there are less and less families and the West needs to import people from overseas to make up the shortfall. The masses won't get how badly society is fucking up until we hit rock bottom. It looks like we have to hit it for the message to be gotten across.

Women's rights will NEVER be rescinded in our society, it doesn't matter how many problems it would solve. Society would rather go down with women being empowered than save all of us from the end of society.

(StormlitAqua)
@FACEandLMS

13/06/2018 and I hear that NETFLIX is to BAN STARING on set. Gyms are now concerned about sexual harrassment and will take measures.

The only harassment and staring that will be reported is when UGLY men do it, not good looking men. Women do not mind these things when a good looking man does these things. This is just another attack on ugly men.

(blackletcel)
gonna be a female president one day ans she will ruin everything

(Submitter's note: At the point of submission, it's 29 votes for and 1 against disenfranching women.)

Bruce #conspiracy illuminatiwatchdog.blogspot.ca

A Hollywood Set Designer's Experience

The following comes from our California source. As with our other interviews and tell alls, the identity of the subject will remain anonymous. The person whose story you are about to read worked as a set designer and builder for various Hollywood studios before being terminated for asking too many questions. He was kind enough to write this short testimonial about his experiences and what he saw regarding the Illuminati. As a warning, we must let you know that it's laced with profanity and derogatory comments about conspiracy theorists. He insisted that we reproduce his piece as he'd written it or not at all. We managed to get him to relent on some incriminating details. Regardless of the delivery, our source gave us some valuable insight that makes this worthwhile. We apologize in advance for any offense you may take.

"For about 20-25 years I worked on movie sets. At first, I did mostly carpentry work for films. Some of it was pretty cool but most of it was mundane. Probably the most fun I had was building the sound stage portions of the H.M.S. Surprise for "Master and Commander". I really liked paying attention to the intricate historical details. Working on the romantic comedy sets was probably the worst, not that all of those movies sucked. Don't get me wrong, most of them did. Hell, most movies I worked on were awful. What I hated about those was that I felt like we were making sets based on crap the director or lead designer saw in a Pottery Barn catalog. There wasn't anything challenging or interesting about it.

So, I worked my way up from carpentry to set design and actually got to do something more rewarding, and I'll say this, mostly to piss off directors who might read this, creating an elaborate set based on what someone (usually a director) wrote on a bar napkin the night before can be a real bitch. Get this straight, Spielberg, 30 words you wrote following your 10th martini aren't enough to convey your "vision" to us. Okay, I didn't work for Spielberg either, but I know some guys who said he was like this.

Let me get to the stuff you're interested in. I got assigned to work on "censored for subject's security". I was pretty excited to work on this picture. I had been a fan of the franchise as a kid and thought it would be cool to lend my artistic talents to the latest rendition. I wasn't too happy when I got stuck working on some of the secondary sets rather than the main ones such as the "censored" and "censored". Not that I would take credit for what those guys designed anyhow. They were both shit.

So, one of the things I had to design was this fancy chair, and I spent a lot of time on it, mostly because a legendary actor would be sitting in it. The damn thing had to be just right, and I made sure it was. Then me and a few of the builders put it together. We then brought it to the set and told one of the director's assistants that they could shoot whenever they wanted. Our work was done.

On the day of filming, I wanted to be there, actually it was more like had to be in case anything went wrong. So that morning, I get on set and take a place near the catering table. Free food was always one of the perks when working while shooting was going on. Okay, back to the point, sometime after scarfing my third cruller I noticed that the chair I had built wasn't on set. It had been replaced by this weird one made in the shape of a triangle. It didn't really go with the set. Needless to say, I was pissed and the next thing I knew was that I was wanting to speak to the director or whatever high honcho I could find to vent my frustration.

And let me give this piece of advice to aspiring Hollywood workers, referring to a director's preferences as "fucking bullshit" while that director is within earshot is not a good idea. Yeah, I'll admit it, I haven't exactly been working for the big studios lately. Don't get me wrong, I've found work, but it's mostly with television studios and ad agencies. Some of which actually pay more, but I really liked seeing my work on the big screen. The feeling you got was like the one you'd get after doing a hot girl, I'm talking big tits and nice ass here. You dumbasses had better print that too.

When "censored" hit theaters, I made sure to see it, even though they switched out my chair for a damn triangle. I had still designed the rest of the set and wanted to see how it meshed with the CGI. When I saw the scene with my stuff and that chair, I didn't really think much of it at the time, but there was a bright orb that had been added by the CGI guys emanating from the top of the chair. It wasn't until I read some stuff about the Illuminati that I realized there were likely greater forces at play in the decision to replace my chair. It definitely resembled a pyramid with the Eye of Providence.

Ray Comfort #fundie facebook.com

In a recent post I asked the question which came first--air or lungs, the heart or blood, etc.? Frankten Goethe (presumably a believer in Darwinian evolution) stepped up to the plate and answered each question, ending with "science has evidence for its answers."

Frankten believed that air came first. But if the air came first, where did it come from, and how was it that it had just the right amount of oxygen to sustain human life? While human lungs were evolving how did we breathe? Why did they evolve if life was already sustained without them?

Next he believed that our incredibly complex blood formed before the heart. Why did it do that, and how did it get around the body if there was no heart?

Frankten believed that male and female (for some reason) evolved at the same time, over time. They had to, because they needed each other to survive, as did each of the millions of species, each of which have male and female. Why and how did evolution cause these millions of different species to evolve as male and female, each with different (but corresponding) reproductive parts? How did they reproduce while these parts were supposedly evolving?

Next he believed that water evolved before thirst. We know that we can't live without water, so how did we (and the millions of animals) survive if we had no thirst?

Frankten also believed that food evolved before the stomach. So eggs, wheat, beef, cabbage, potatoes, tomatoes, apples, and a million and one other amazing foods evolved but we couldn't eat anything because the stomach hadn't evolved. Nor had our teeth, tongue, taste buds, epiglottis, esophagus, digestive juices, as well as small and large intestines.

I am amazed at how such an unthinking and unthinkable unproven and unprovable theory has survived for all these years, and that some have the gall to believe that it's even slightly scientific.

Genesis simply and plainly tells us that all creation was brought into being at once by the hand of Almighty God. A that's not a pleasant thought for sin-loving sinners.

Unknown #fundie scienceblogs.com

[This is just one paragraph of a long, rambling EMail sent to PZ Myers about the Cincinnati Zoo/Creation Museum flap]

Evolution is used now as a tool to promote the vulgar and disgusting homosexual movement that has recently become violent. By claiming that evolution is real, the gay community can claim that they were born gay, which is absurd. No one is born gay. it is a psychological problems that stems from early childhood scenarios. Even the APA used to say this until they were pressured by the far left to change history and change science. That's what they do best.

[Follow the link to the whole letter and more!]

Alan S. Hartzog #fundie drmsh.com

The flat earth is a lot like the bible. The bigots with closed minds always want to speak out. Those who have studied and researched the least are those who oppose thinkingbfor them selves the most. Many people who, like you, haven't done their home work, would bash the bible, and call believers stupid. You discarding your own followers ideas is a sign of immaturity, pride and everything YHWH dislikes about haughty humans. There is no love or understanding of love, scripture, or a flat earth in your pompous opinions. You would rather spout out at those who you say follow you than to research deep, for yourself and draw you own unbiased opinion. You have obviously been brainwashed, hypnotized and taught well to regurgitate the teachings of the world rather that seeking humbly in prayer for what YHWH says. He should know best. Remember, YHWH says the wisdom and knowledge of this world is foolishness to the creator. "Science so called" is foolishness to YAH. The ancients were much more aware of the earth, luminaries, and how things really work that today's bubblegum, microwave, Netflix, Facebook, skinny jeans culture will ever be. You should do your research before you draw conclusions about things you think you understand but are, in reality, blind to. I pray in the name of YAHAWASHI, TO THE FATHER AND CREATOR OF THE UNIVERSE YAHAWAH, that he would humble your spirit, open your eyes, and bend you backward that you may reach and find the truth, not only about the flat earth but also about your own evil judgments and I'll spoken words. Amen!

FaceandHFD #racist #psycho incels.co

[Blackpill] I am pro-bullying

Subhumans are useless if not our greatest enemies if they aren't black pilled and still living in la-la land, as they do women's and Chad's bidding. Bluepilled sub6 men are the ones attacking the blackpill to protect the privileged groups in society. They are the ones going around doxxing our people, writing articles about us, sacrificing themselves for sub3 landwhales and empowering the governments to make women even more privileged and take our freedoms away, while Chad is slaying their wives and oneitises. Subhumans also waste tons of resources the earth is running out of, so that's another great reason to bully them into being low energy and consuming less. You should go out of your way to be mean to all sub 6 men and insult them for their looks unless they show signs of being blackpilled. It will probably bring them closer to suicide or to the truth(blackpill). So it is a win-win.

loiterturd #sexist reddit.com

Harry Potter was written by a Incel there is no way a woman could have created it.

I mean how could a woman(JK rowlings) create something remarkable like the world of harry potter? when the only thing a woman can think about is licking chad's ballsack day and night, it doesn't make any sense.
Think of all the amazing characters, spells, Quiditich a lame rehash of rugby but still something unique added to the canvas, amazing magical concepts like talking portraits, moving staircases, cool monsters like dementors and Thestrals.
Do u think a woman could have come up with that? Impossible mathematically and scientifically.
I know ur dirty secret JK rowling, i know what u got locked in ur wine cellar. U probably got him locked in there for decades feeding him leftover tuna casserole or expired cans of baked beans. I bet he is scribbling notes for "ur" new book right now. he is probably chained to a pole unable to move to more than 5 metres from where he is stationed.And even worse is he is using his feces as a mattress instead of sleeping in the cold hard floor.
This is how cruel normies and roasties are, they don't see us as humans. we are just utensils to use and abuse.
Well no more I will make sure the proper credit is given to the great incel that wrote those books, if it is the last thing i do. Do not think we are harmless u foul normies, that we will stay here in this sub posting and commenting away till we fall down and die. This is just another stepping stone for me to carry out my justice. I am just a college student now but in one years time i will have graduated and be in the working force.
With money comes power. And when i get my power i assure u , u will wish the suicide posts u spam here got through and we Incels would end up dead.

tygerkittn #fundie rr-bb.com

[A fundie posts the email sent to McDonalds in regard to their supporting homosexuals]

"We have six kids, we used to eat at McDonald's fairly frequently, but since you've "gone gay", we've started eating only at Arby's and Wendy's. Our kids were begging to eat at McD's at first, and we explained that you take the money we spend there and use it for things that are bad for society and families, now they won't eat at your restaurants, they wouldn't eat there if it were free. Literally! Amazon sent us dozens of McD's coupons for free sandwiches with our orders, and the kids happily threw them all away.I'm very proud of my kids and very disappointed (but not surprised) in McDonalds.
We're now hooked on beef and cheddars and vanilla frosties, so I don't miss McDonalds and don't really see any reason to go back, especially since you have chosen to take the money you earn, mostly from families, and invest in causes that are totally opposite of what most families believe and stand for.
Well, I'm sure you have a long term business strategy in mind, since gays and lesbians reproduce frequently and have huge families with lots of kids, your business will pick up soon, I'm sure. Oh, wait, THEY DON'T. They're a sterile, reproductive dead end, who depend on the media to recruit young people into their unhealthy lifestyles, and they therefore have no stake in the future, and their best interests are NOT society's best interests, and you're helping them, but not with MY money, not ever again."

various commenters #fundie breitbart.com

RE: Davos: Indian Prime Minister Says Attacks on Globalism Must Be Stopped

(info beam)
Why isn't India allowing muslims to invade their country in the name of globalism? Ah ok. Just white countries that need this ''globalism''. 10/4.

What is happening is our enemies are queuing up in order to destroy us. Globalism = the end of the west. Nothing else too it.

One other thing is that the globalists all have one thing in common- all left wing.
I have to assume that islam is currently being ran by left wingers. It would explain the ease in which the western leftists are so compatible.

(Aneurysm311)
Bingo!!! 2nd largest demilitarized zone on the planet between India and Pakistan. Globalism is great for the 3rd world, just sucks for the West. Outside of getting cheap Wal-Mart tee shirts, all your left with is wage stagnation, federal tax increases, trade deficit, and unfunded liabilities (owed by your grandchildren). But it fine as long as that is all soaked up by white countries and white people... to the point where they can no longer reproduce and are exterminated from the Earth

(VirtualParticle)
“All of us, we are linked together as one family." --Oh Really?
(1) Will Modi allow a million caucasians to immigrate into India annually? ---And spend Indian taxpayer's money on them?
(2) Will India stop banning stores like Tesco, 7-11 and Walmart? --Modi decries protectionism but bans such multinationals from entering his own country!
(3) Will he allow US chicken and beef into his own country? No but he preaches "globalization" !
* * * This Clown is a World Class Hypocrite, Nothing More * * *

(Brother Antony)
And in the meantime his own people live, sleep, beg and die in the gutters of Mumbai. Been there, seen it.

(Charles McRae)
They down not allow Christian NGO's in India unless things have drastically changed. India is determined to stay a Fourth World country. The culture that made the Western world boom or as the race hustler say the white world great, will work any where on any race.

(VirtualParticle)
I think Ganesh the elephant god is Modi's animal worship of choice.
He also turns a blind eye to millions of women (including white tourist women) raped every year in India, countless brides burnt to death by unhappy husbands, rich Indians who play "master and servants" with their poor fellow citizens, the open air shiiting of people in the streets (even when they have toilets) --does his best to make India a real model Shiithole.

(Brother Antony)
He may be another of those Indian freaks that orally recycles his own urine in the morning, so that may go a long way to explaining sacred cow worship.

Similar in a way to the Saudis' imbibing camel pee and worshiping a big black rock.

All much of a muchness in those so enriching excrement apertures (to paraphrase Trump).

(LIEberalshate)
We are only linked together if whitey is footing the bill and donating Billions of $ to them.

(jason callio)
Working hand in hand with the worlds other greatest threat. Islam. Both united in their goal of defeating western civilization.

(Schrödinger's cat )
Apart from driving the entire West Bank during an uprising, complete with burning tyres and hurled boulders, the most dangerous road journey I must have ever undertaken was between New Delhi and Jaipur. The truck drivers are all on a suicide mission, and a number I saw succeeded in this regard, but the main obstacle was cows on the road, every 100 yards. Since they are holy, they may not be run down. Eating them is death sentence territory.

I like black peppers on mine.

(LIEberalshate)
If leaders of shi*thole Countries think something is good then it's the opposite for the rest of us. All of these non white sub humans keep trying to eliminate whitey. We must put a stop to it.

FACEandLMS #fundie love-shy.com

RANT:

You're over the hill by your late 20s, especially if you look your age. You're now THE oldest guy who still goes to nightclubs. You can't get girls in their LOOKS, FERTILITY and YOUTH PRIME anymore. And even if you can snag the odd one, you have nothing in common with them.

By 30, you should be settling down and ready to have kids. If you have a kid at 30, you'll be in your 40s when it's 10. You won't even be able to play sports with the kid soon after that.

All of your sexual adventures and sowing of your wild oats should be out of your system by now.

But as an INCEL, you're teens and 20s were crap. The PEAK of your YOUTH was spent getting rejected by girls, playing videogames and scraping pass grades in school, only just. So, you didn't even enjoy your youth. Now that you're older, more bitter, slightly balding on the temples, your skin has lost its youthful suppleness, and now you're developing nasolabial folds, what good is to come?

By 30, you've come to realize that your life is now split between working and commuting (70%) and being exhausted from working (30%). If the "good times" weren't even good, why do you think the 30s will be any good? Being an incel in your 20s looks like you were unlucky to a woman. Being an incel in your 30s is a sign that something is wrong.

No one - who doesn't share some of your DNA - loves you. All that's ahead is work, and bills. So what does an incel have to look forward to after 35? Balding? Prostate cancer? Dying alone and getting eaten by his cats?

I'm not 35, but I'm heading there soon enough. Time flies. Now, the only reason why I am "still trying" even though I'm LATE, is because I'm not brave enough to "check out" / visit god / come eat Sue. E. Side. So I'm only making an effort coz I'm trapped here.

How can you even fucking stand to get out of bed, being 38, and INCEL? Having to work just to keep a roof over your head, so you can work, so you can keep a roof over your head, so you can work....?

LOL@being 44 years old and incel. Biology's Chinese water torture.

There's a divorced programmer where I work. He's about 55yo, bald, 0/10. He's divorced, meaning he lucked out in the early feminism era, but after the divorce, feminism being in full swing, he remained INCEL. This guy programs at home as well as work. We can see that he checks in programming code in New Years Eve evening. While reasonably goodlooking men are boning chicks, he's writing routines so that the cash balance of one account can be concatenated with some other fucking value.

Even if you reach 36 and snag a 32 year old woman, she'll look awful. People look revolting as they age. I honestly have no idea how anyone can fuck a woman over the age of 40. With her wrinkles and vagina that looks like corned beef. Think of how many cocks passed through there in her 20s while you were playing videogames in yours. Now you get her when she looks haggered. Well done. If we're programmed to be attracted to signs of youth and fertility, how do men become aroused for 45 year old women who are about as fertile as a shoe? No wonder old men need viagra. Women start to look subhuman after 35. I'd rather thrust into a DVD drive. Compare pics of non Hollywood celeb women at 16 and age 48. The difference is night and day.

At least if you meet a girl in her 20s, you can gradually accustom to her face disintegrating. But meeting her at 43, after her cock caroussel marathon? Lucky me.

If only I knew how I'd feel now. That's the thing about aging. No matter how wise you become, it's always TOO LATE. You can't go back.

I just can't take aging.

/rant

Lookismisreal #sexist reddit.com

A femoids purity lies entirely within how many people it has had sexual intercourse with and what kind of sexual stuff it has engaged in. To be pure, a femoid must remain a virgin (virginally and analy) until marriage without engaging in any kind of repugnant or hedonistic behavior with men that it does not know of. Unfortunately, in this day and age, finding a bitch who is a virgin is like finding a needle in a haystack; it's nothing but an impossible task.

Why aren't femoids pure anymore? What is the reason for this phenomenon, you may ask. While there are multiple reasons, it could be narrowed down to two main reasons: one being, sexual freedom. And the other being, feminism. These two factors are responsible for the destruction of the femoid organisms, especially the cunts that are raised in this degenerate generation.

Femoid sexual freedom itself was the biggest mistake mankind has ever made. I mean, just think about it: cuntrags are the gatekeepers of sex, in which, they are the ones who decides who they want to have sex with. By giving them sexual freedom one breaks the natural order that has been going on for centuries, which is, men being the ones deciding who bitches should mate with. But now, due to these creatures having immense amount of sexual freedom, they single-handedly hold the monopoly over every man in this world.

When it comes to feminism, it has ruined femoids by indoctrinating them with false and degenerate beliefs. The feminist legbeards view slutting around with multiple people as "empowerment" and "progression" to a point where they brainwash impressionable femoids at a young age saying how there is nothing wrong getting railed by multiple men a week. Cum dumpsters being idiotic as they are listen to these false teaching only in turn engage in degenerate behavior. And by doing so, not only these bitches lose their virginity at a very young age, but they keep on riding the cawk arousal until their cunts are battered, mangled loose beef curtains.

Back in the day, the purity of a femoid was not only encouraged and supported but cherished as well. However, in this day and age, femoid purity is slowly turning itself into a myth, in which, it will become history in a few decades.

metabuxx #sexist incels.co

[RageFuel] Happy International Women's Day folks..

* Today we respect toilets (even though they have done nothing to deserve this respect) who scream patriarchy and misogyny whenever they are asked to fulfill their duties because they are so used to their privileges that they want their paychecks just for existing.
* Today we celebrate whores who under the veil of experimenting, finding their sexuality and living life on their terms, ride the cock carousel and fuck every Chad and dog that comes in their way
* Today we celebrate cunts who take kill innocent babies with impunity, take birth controls, tie their tubes up, so that they can ride the cock carousel without any repercussions.
* Today we celebrates ""queens"" who thrive on the validation of their beta orbiters, extort money from them by selling feet pics and nudes and then have the audacity to call themselves empowered.
* Today we celebrate #MeToo, a foolproof strategy employed by holes to extort money from their imaginary abusers who supposedly abused them 30 years ago.
* Today we celebrate single mothers who divorce raped their beta husbands, separated their kids from their fathers and turned their sons into thieves and murderers and left.
* Today we remind ourselves that when holes choose Chads and dogs to fuck, its their preference but when we demand a hole to not be a landwhale we are misogynists who should be hanged till death.
* Today we recognize the fact that when holes demand free money, privileges, sex and surgeries its their birthright and they deserve it, but when we ask for it we are told "You are not entitled to sex, inkwell."
* Today we celebrate holes who cheat on their betabux husbands, force them to raise Chad's babies and if they refuse to do so, accuse them of domestic violence and take everything that once belonged to those innocent men.
* Today we celebrate mediocrity as having a vagina means celebration but having a penis means that we are yet another disposable member of the society who is only good for wageslaving and whose tax dollars are spend on holes so that they can live a better life.

iamhopeless256 #sexist reddit.com

A look inside stacie's life

Stacy wakes up and she checks normiegram, normiebook and her dating sites. She got 400 likes on her photo on Instagram, Chad commented "thick" the beta orbiter commented "Gorgeous" and her friend Katie pm'd her asking if she hooked up with Chad. She replies "yes he was so good" Stacy and Katie blew 2 chads together the night before, they are good friends. She checks her dating site and sees 2 guys who she fucked in her inbox, she rolls her eyes and blocks them. They were attractive, but they were bad in bed. She has 70 new messages and only 3 of them are chads. One says "dtf" the other says "you trying to hangout?" And the last one says "want to grab something to eat" Stacy thinks to herself hmm.. maybe I can fuck all of them today. She puts on some dry shampoo, makeup and she is ready to meet Chad #1 now. She goes over to his house, Chad says she looks nothing like her picture but that's ok. Stacy laughs hehe you're so funny, Chad makes some bullshit small talk and she just laughs and eye fucks him. Chad fucks her in the kitchen and she is off to meet Chad #2. When Chad 2 opens the door she says "omg your so tall hehe" Chad says she is just short and he greets her. After drinking some of chads cheap ass champagne, they get 2 minutes into Netflix and chill and she is trying to suck his dick. While she sucks his dick the door opens, Chad?!?! It's not what it looks like! Says Chad. Stacy runs out of the apartment, the adrenaline feels good. The next day chads girlfriend forgave him because Chad said he will make it up to her; Chad said he will try out bsdm with her. Stacy is off to meet Chad #3. Chad 3 takes her to red lobster, Chad sees her looking at the most expensive meal on the menu and he is thinking "this slut better not fucking order that" he then suggests something cheaper and he says it's phenomenal. She smiles and says okay. Chad is feeling a little spontaneous today, so they go fuck In an empty parking lot. Stacy goes home and writes on Twitter "it was such a long day" and "I'm lonely anyone want to cuddle?" Her ex comes over and they fight and then they fuck. After that they cuddle, watch some normie tv shows and smoke some bowls.

inert4ever #sexist reddit.com

It's not a fucking cope, I think everyone who unloads their cum using sex dolls realizes that there are Chads living on God-mode, but that this is the most reasonable alternative. For sub-8, sex doll is much preferable to anything they would otherwise scrape up.
The sex doll looks much better than what genetically inferior males could ever get. It's not disgusting like a prostitute or a used up roastie. It doesn't talk about stupid shit or use you as emotional tampon. There is no danger of betabux or being pressured to raise the screaming spawn vomited out of her cunt. It will not mentally or physically cheat on you with Chad. You won't get locked down to a Dead Bedroom by a frustrated man-hating shit who only loves the Chad who pumped and dumped her.

You won't have to work like a horse to raise your value from 3 to 5, only to end up with a whiny feminist landwhale. It doesn't nag or attempt to control you with sex. You are free to pursue your own interests, not having to constantly consider whether an action you take will close the cuntgates.
It's pure delusionality for incel to cross out this possibility out of their minds as "cope", since clearly it eliminates all the negative qualities of female relations, while retaining the important aspects. Remember: females only love Chad, so there is no genuine affection to be lost.

Jake #racist m.topix.com

Slipping and sliding
Heavy foot on the blood of the Negroes
The sun roasting the hot wooden deck
Watching the apes scream
The salt stings the sliced black flesh
Those squealing toads rocked by Captain Beck
His whip flying through the mist
Give the white man your bare back
We can be rest assured, like an egg....it will crack
Negroes tumbling over the edge
Down below
Their cries of pain echoes in the belly of the vessel
One by one in chains that follow the snake
Negroes rounded up on the plank
Their ebony skin burning in the sun's rays
The Great White Shark circling in the water
They can smell the black sweat as the weight hits the tide
Their fins disappear
As the apes go down like a string of beads
Hail, hail....thanks to rolling sea
Bodies piled up on wooden boards
Down they go
Around they go
Black toads burial at sea to shining sea !!!!

True Player #fundie rooshvforum.com

[Images not included]
MODERN FEMINISM

Sometimes you can’t help but think there must have been divine intervention. The same day I pen my article about why Adelaide women are the best in Australia, I pick up the front page of the paper to see outrage that 500 young Adelaide women have had naked photos of themselves plastered all over an American website.

You may have noticed I didn’t sing the praises of Adelaide women aged 18—25 in my article. That was for good reason. Here is a passage that unfortunately didn’t pass the final ROK edit:

One word of warning: you had better strike while the iron is hot. With feminism destroying women at a truly scary rate all over the world, this could very well be the last generation of desirable Adelaide women. On recent visits I have noticed a disturbing rise in the number of girls aged 18-25 with ugly tattoos and piercings. Obviously, it goes without saying they are addicted to their smartphones. It breaks my heart because many of these girls would be really attractive if they embraced their natural beauty, put on a nice dress, and put down that damn phone.

I truly believe western millennial girls are nightmares, even in sleepy little Adelaide. What we are seeing with so called ”revenge porn” is an example of the disturbing but inevitable consequences of the first generation of women who, brainwashed by feminist propaganda, truly believe they can do no wrong, and that there are no consequences for their actions. Throw in their smart phone addictions and toxic need for constant social media validation and you have a recipe for disaster.

At this rate, we are not too far from a world where every second man’s girlfriend’s or wife’s tits will be plastered all over the net, her slutiness on display for the whole world to see. This is supposed to be your loving life partner, the mother of your children? How can any man these girls meet in the future possibly take them seriously?
A tech-savvy generation? Millennial girls’ behaviour indicates otherwise

fb-addicted1

Young women are so addicted to social media they can’t see the negative effects it has on their lives

The millennial girl’s smartphone obsession is of course the root of their misery, but it’s their lack of intelligence and social awareness that is truly astounding. How can they not get it? Once a photo is put on the internet, it is there forever. Media reporting on this story was incredibly irresponsible. These photos certainly were not “stolen”, as journalists claimed. Whoever got these photos didn’t break into these girls houses, nor were they Peeping Toms who had secretly photographed them without their knowledge or consent. In fact, they had been willingly uploaded to social media or sent directly to the latest bad boy to make their vaginas tingle. From that point onwards, they were totally at the mercy of that bad boy as to what happened next. Some empowerment! Now admittedly putting them on the web for the whole world to see is a pretty low act, but they don’t call them bad boys for nothing. You can bet your bottom dollar these are the guys who are far more likely to receive and distribute “sexts” than the nice guys forever languishing in the friend zone.

Despite all this, I feel sorry for these girls. They have grown up in age where being a slut is glorified and where their peers give as little thought to posting revealing selfies online or sending “sexts” as they do to taking a piss. Unlike women from previous generations, at no point in their lives have they been pulled aside and told in no uncertain terms that being easy reflects poorly on themselves and is likely to be a one way ticket to disaster. It’s not politically correct, you see, and many have been denied a strong father figure by their money-hungry mom who wanted freedom, a divorce and custody. This is why millennial girls are not only narcissistic and slutty, but completely oblivious to how broken they have become, and why they are hopelessly addicted to the crack pipe of Instagram, Facebook and Twitter. All they need to do to break free of this toxic cycle is log off, but unplugging from the vortex would be unthinkable. Next thing you know, BAM, there they are spreading their legs on the net for the whole world to see for the rest of time.
Millennial girls are trapped in a social media vortex

Woman using cell phone on bed

Young women love selfies more than life itself

“Revenge porn” wouldn’t exist if young women weren’t so obsessed with selfies. Sadly, millennial girls are so infatuated with internet “fame” everything else is merely background music. To demonstrate how warped their perspectives are, consider this. What did this girl do when she found out she was on the site? She re-uploaded a photo from the site of her in the shower to her Facebook! Yep, she tried to get even more attention! All this does is draw even more people to check out the website she is supposedly so outraged about. Out of curiosity I looked up her Facebook page, and sure enough, it is selfie after selfie. She is quite hot, but obviously so desperate for fame I can’t help but wonder if she is secretly thrilled she now has a chance to step out of the shadows of her well-known football playing brothers. As the shocking revelation of Dubai Porta Potties showed, millennial women want fame, no matter what the price is.
Women have been betrayed by feminism

PW_ClementineFord

Feminist woofer Clementine Ford.. all for female empowerment, but for God’s sake don’t expect women to exercise self-responsibility

Predictably, critics have directed all their energy into attacking the faceless American creators of this site and furiously denouncing “victim blaming”, rather than spreading the word to young women everywhere that uploading raunchy photos to social media and sexting guys is risky behaviour with potentially very serious consequences. Bottom line: If girls don’t send these pics out, they can’t end up on a site like this. That would put these “shady creeps” out of business permanently. But in the twisted minds of feminists, prevention is never better than cure: don’t teach women to do X, teach men not to do Y. They have always played the victim, abrogated the concept of self-responsibility and denied the reality that women’s actions have potential consequences, and now girls everywhere who were brainwashed to believe exactly that are paying the price.
Is there any hope for young women?

Teens-social-media

Scenes like this will be familiar to us all.. what does it take for young women to put down their phones?

The prospect of having a daughter one day seriously scares the hell out of me. What chance do you have of raising a decent human being, when you are fighting a reckless pro-slut cultural tsunami?

There was a time when the family unit provided the guidance young women needed to develop important values. Unfortunately, with The Decline accelerating this is often impossible. For most girls, any semblance of fatherhood authority has long gone. If they really care for the welfare of girls, mothers and genuinely concerned women need to fill this void and educate them that acting like a slut must be avoided, for this behaviour places them at risk of ending up on sites like this, forever. Is that something they really want? They might also want to consider how driving a strong man out of their daughter’s life might have devastating consequences.
Conclusion

Like so many other modern social problems, feminism is definitely to blame for “revenge porn”. This warped ideology has always irresponsibly promoted the delusional idea that women have all the same rights as men, but without responsibilities or consequences for their actions. They were the ones who encouraged a life of reckless hedonism and narcissism for young women, with no thought for their futures. They were the ones who spun the gross lie that being pumped and dumped by men who couldn’t care less about them is “empowering.” These 500 Adelaide women are just a drop in the ocean of the many girls who are being sacrificed daily at the altar of “female empowerment.” This is what happens when it is politically incorrect to state the obvious: that acting like a slut is dangerous for a woman’s honour, credibility and future happiness.

Various Incels #sexist incels.co

(Venomkore)

[RageFuel] Female “Introverts” piss me the fuck off

image

1st panel: A boy say “I’m a shy introvert”

2nd panel: A girl says “I’m a shy introvert”

3rd panel: Offscreen figures say to angry-looking boy: “Enjoy being alone”, “Man up fag”, “Fucking creep”, “Loser”

4th panel: Offscreen figures say to happy-looking girl: “Ur so cute lol”, “tfw no shy gf”, “Want to go out?”, “Well, let’s fix that”, “I like shy girls anyway :)”, “It’s OK, want to try and talk?”

this sums it up basically
But actually none of them are fucking introverts they say they are and still do low inhib shit all the time. I basically just play vidya all day. WTF DO THEY THINK BEING AN INTROVERT IS, WATCHING NETFLIX EVERY EVENING??? JFL at this, here is what real introverts are like

image

A father comes home saying “Are ya winning, son?” while his son lays there with blood pouring out of his head, having killed himself

(curryZoomercoomer)

Fact: All the shy and innocent foids are actually the biggest whores.

They just flash strangers on omegle and send snapchat nudes to the latest chad to ask her for them lol

Indeed, there is no such thing as an innocent virgin girl.

(Animecel2D)

They don’t exist. All of them crave attention.

(RemoveNormalfags)

Females are just introvert when no Chad is around.
They become very extrovert when there is a Chad.

(MayorOfKekville)

Foids think they are Introverts™ because they only go out 3 nights a week and wait for chad to make the first move.

(The Incel Decade)

Women can't be introverts any more than they can be Incel. Women are designed to be social.

Even the autists

(Boeuf)

"I'm like, so anxious, I cancelled my rendezvous with chad to sit inside and watch netflix and eat pizza. I'm so lonely like oh my god."
God fucken damn it I want to fucken pierce their heads with a bullet

(Jazavac)

they are all the same, terms like "introvert" are just cosmetic to them. much like make-up, they only use them to attract attention to themselves.

(Arthas93)

Nice read OP, agreed. Foids only call themselves introverts to get attention, specially from Chad. There is no such thing as "introvert foids", it's just an act, an attention grabbing tool.

Like when they say they have "depression". Their depression is not being engaged to a 6' Chad. Foids are showered 24/7 with attention, privileges, gifts, the opposite sex giving them validation and acceptance.

Worthless whores, one day their free ride will end. No good thing lasts forever.

(TheGambler2)

They think staying in and watching netflix some weekends(instead of getting banged by chad at a party) counts as introvert.Imagine being completely friendless autist ldaring at home daily because any social interaction is a failure while society continuously blames you for it

(Atavistic Autist)

image

>asl
feamle 19
>about yourself
i am crazy. i have ass burgers. i am incredibly cool and fun. i hardly shower. sleeping on my bed gives me anxiety so i sleep on the floor next
to it. ive given head to 2 different men multiple times. i scored a 1550 on my sat. i dont have a chair i was held back in 1st grade. im going to
vacation in new york next year. i am a normie.
>interests
adderall and pseudoscience
>looking for
i want to fall in love. i won't fall in love but ill make friends with you and lead you on if youre male or desperate.
>not looking for
sex offenders and aliens
>voice/video
im not stupid like you
>fav movie/vidya
shawshank redemption

A perfect example of a female introvert

le quirky xD

She is actually being tremendously honest due to her autism, and not pretending to be unique at all.

That's what's extraordinary about it. She even admits to her internal contradictions. "Ass burger" but "normie" (because foid), wanting to fall in love but really only leading males on (because they're "desperate"/sub-HSM).

larp

Perhaps, but I wouldn't count on it. Autistic foids tend to be very blatant about their intentions, insanities, and narcissistic personaliteeehees, whereas neurotypical foids are the ones who try to make themselves look better/different than they really are.

The way that you attributed the apparent honesty of an autistic slut to a "not like the other girl" tier LARP is quite ironic. Autistic people are often put under a lens of suspicion for being honest like this, when they're really, truly concealing nothing from the world, JFL.

In the case of autistic men, NTs will suspect them of being psychopathic mass-murderers or rapists or potential school shooters, when it's actually the charming Chad who has the 'bodies in his closet,' likes abusing women, and derives enjoyment from bullying others (and killing their spirits, if nothing else).

Fact: All the shy and innocent foids are actually the biggest whores.

In the case of foids with autism, it's paradoxically because they're more likely to be honest about being sluts, whereas extroverted foids often lie and try to seem of a higher social status.

The inverse of this, I'm sure, is that men with autism are more likely to be honest about being incel, whereas NT men lie more often and say they're Chad-tier.

Roosh #fundie rooshv.com

7 Things I Require In The Future Mother Of My Child

It’s common in these parts to make fun of women for having a delusional shopping list when seeking out a mate, but is it possible that our lists for finding women are also unreasonable? I asked myself this question while constructing a list of requirements I need in a woman who I think would be suitable for reproduction (and not necessarily state-sanctioned marriage). I ask you, dear reader, if my list is as deranged as that of a woman’s.

The following is what I require in a woman for a long-term relationship that involves having children:

1. She must be between 18-25 years old

In the case I want to have more than two kids, I need to find a woman who is substantially younger than myself so she is biologically able to keep popping them out. This requirement also accounts for the fact that single women over 25 are emotionally damaged in some way, are alpha widowed, or are professional daters who are incapable of making the proper relationship sacrifices.

2. She must have less than three prior sexual partners, though I prefer a virgin

Studies show that the more sexual partners a woman has before marriage, the more likely that marriage will fail. I also don’t want to marry a woman who has voluntarily accepted being used as a cum dumpster by other men, or who kisses my child with lips that have been previously wrapped around many other cocks. My child will not have a “reformed” slut mother.

For a woman who has had sexual partners before me, I must be the absolute best man she has ever been with in terms of appearance, personality, and resources. Otherwise, once the honeymoon is over and the relationship hits an inevitable low point, she will get a “Could I have done better?” itch and sabotage the relationship or test me to the point where I have to play “dread game” just to keep her in the kitchen. There must be no doubt within her mind that I am the best that she could possibly get.

3. Her physical attractiveness should hover around the 7 range

Thanks to technology and modern cosmopolitan society, a woman who is an 8 or above in beauty has been exposed to more toxic situations and experiences where she’s achieved some level of e-fame, been validated incessantly for her appearance, and been offered money, consumer products, and trips for her vagina (and likely accepted those offers). She has also fully utilitized her beauty to get her way in life, including prime seating for manipulating men for personal gain. Not only is such a woman harder to manage, but her entitlement is far higher. For a life partner I will purposefully aim lower than what I could get for casual sex.

4. Her skin tone should be within two shades of myself

I would like to have kids that look like me, so I will not reproduce with a woman who is black, Asian, or Indian. Acceptable races are South American, Persian, Armenian, and European (non-Northern). The average Croatian or Romanian girl is more similar to my appearance than Spanish or Italian.

5. She must be feminine

She must be a woman who takes great pride in her appearance and the feminine abilities that nature bestowed upon her. I don’t want her to be a mindless weakling who needs me all the time, but she should look and act like a woman and not try to compete with me in terms of mental or physical strength.

6. She must want to be a traditional stay-at-home mother

Once the kids arrive, she should have no desire to pursue a pointless office career in place of taking care of our growing brood. She may have some freedom to pursue hobbies like yoga or knitting, but her place will be in the home while I tirelessly work on my internet ebook hustle to bring home the bread that gives her everything she needs.

When I come home from work (at the cafe), I expect the kids to be clean, the house to be in good order, and preparations for dinner planned. I shall not participate in more than 5% of household duties outside of home improvement. In exchange, she will never have to worry about money or work outside the home. She can live a pleasant middle-class lifestyle that can even include dog and car ownership.

7. She must believe in a god

My experience shows that a woman who doesn’t believe in god has a value system taught to her by corporations and progressive degenerates. She will certainly be addicted to internet attention, alcohol, casual sex, material possessions, or food. She has relativistic morality, and what she thinks of as morality is actually built upon her feelings. When faced with any type of stress, she will almost always follow the herd or make the wrong decision. A woman who believes in god, while still prone to making mistakes, makes less of them and at least has a mental system encouraging her to perform good.

Conclusion

I believe the seven things above are quite reasonable, and something that would have taken no more than a 6-month search two generations ago, but based on my last decade of intensive fornication, I’ve encountered maybe two girls who fit the bill, especially when it comes to girls being a virgin and eager to stay at home. Part of this reason is that most of my time hunting for women was spent in big cities where such values are rapidly disappearing.

The decision I have to make now is how badly I want kids. If I don’t want kids, I should live in a place like Poland where I can attain a comfortable life of easy sex with “strong and independent” sluts, but where it’s close to impossible to meet girls who meet the above requirements (in the Polish cities I have lived in). If I do want to have kids, I should immediately move, because I’m surely not getting any younger. The two countries that seem to best accomplish my list are Ukraine and Russia, though there are huge obstacles and difficulties with living there long term instead of just going for two months of adventure and fun.

While I can honestly state that I’m not crazy about having kids right now, I know that my desires can change and so I have to guess if I will want them within five years time. Only five years ago I was still in the middle of nonstop casual sex, thinking the party would never end, and of course the music did stop and it’s something that no longer drives me. If being a father is in my future, I must prepare for it now.

Persiana #fundie canadaka.net

I never said bikini's signified consent. However, if you're 14 years old with breasts just popping out of your chest and you're running around in hooker boots and booty shorts where half your ass hangs out (No, not just short shorts, I mean booty shorts where half your ass really IS hanging out) and a bikini top or some other fragile excuse for clothing, and you get spoken to with disrespect, and you get treated with disrespect, then my point is that they can't really place the entire blame on the other party. The disrespect began with themselves.

Again sorry, this does not signify disrepect on the part of the girls or the apropriatness of a fifty year old man to offer his services.


I suppose it depends on the individual, really. There's the girls who are simply too young & ignorant, and rather unfortunately have parents who simply don't care... they usually grow into young adults who also don't care, it has a rather snowball effect. There's also the 'rebels' ...the girls who do come from perfectly good homes, who rebel against their parents morals and do so by being as scantily clad as they can without getting arrested for public indecency. Women and girls who dress "nicely" are fine. Women and girls who dress "slutty" and "Skanky" are not so fine. I do not look at them & think "Wow, they look fine!" although you as a male perhaps are doing so without even realizing how shockingly low these girls self-esteem truly is. Healthy sexuality does not mean that they have to sleep with everybody who pays them a compliment, nor does "slut" equal healthy sexuality. A girl who wears a "slut" t-shirt and takes a 50 year old guy up on his offers, isn't healthy. I rather prefer the girls who can actually realize the inappropriateness of the fifty year old man offering his services that you mentioned, than the ones who don't. Both types of girls exist but when they dress the same way, how is the 50 year old guy supposed to be able to tell them apart? Get it yet? Its a learning curve. 50 year old guy has probably learned that he has better luck with skanks than classy women, so those are the ones he offers his services to.

Matt Forney #sexist mattforney.com

I am smarter than nearly all the girls I’ve ever known.

That’s not arrogance talking: it’s the truth. Out of all the girls I’ve known, maybe three were at least as smart as me, and of that three, one is more intelligent than me. All the rest were my intellectual inferiors. I don’t hold it against them; in fact, when I run across girls who tout their “intelligence,” I feel nauseous, like I’m dealing with a pack of overeager Mormon missionaries.

One of the most dangerous delusions of modern America is the idea that girls are desirable because of how smart they are. Indeed, the idea that intelligent girls even exist in significant numbers is ridiculous. Puffed up by you-go-grrl propaganda from the media, their heads filled with lies from the universities, every girl who can spell her own name suddenly thinks she’s Einstein. Worst of all, girls think that being able to spell their own names entitles them to a good man, even when they’re bossy, defiant and lacking in feminine graces.

This is laughable.

The reality is that truly intelligent females are rare, and most girls who consider themselves “smart” are not. More importantly, the idea that men should find female intelligence attractive is as preposterous as expecting them to find hermaphroditism sexy. A girl’s most important aspects will always be her beauty, her charm and her willingness to please, with intelligence so far down the list that it might as well not be on the list.

Yet thanks to white knights artificially pumping up the egos of every girl in America, men are made to feel like freaks for considering a girl’s bust size to be more important than her ability to regurgitate Marxist tripe.

Here are my reasons why female intelligence is a fraud.
1. Few girls are actually intelligent.

This is the most important thing to know: intelligence is largely a masculine attribute. IQ testing has consistently shown that while men and females have the same mean intelligence, men have a wider standard deviation while females cluster around the middle. In layman’s terms, this means that there are more intelligent men than there are intelligent girls. At the same time, it also means that there are more unintelligent men then unintelligent girls, which is why the short bus tends to be a sausage fest. The “dumb bimbo” stereotype is a fiction invented by ugly girls.

Turns out that “boys go to Jupiter to get more stupider, girls go to college to get more knowledge” was at least half true.

This is why it’s a waste of time for smart men to cast about for a girl who is their intellectual equal: she simply doesn’t exist. You have a better chance of talking Zooey Deschanel and Ellen Page into a threesome than finding a girl who can match you in knowledge, life experience and all-around brains. You do find the occasional woman who can hold her own with men, but these exceptions don’t disprove the rule, any more than the existence of Kim Peek disproves the fact that most autistics are hand-flapping retards.

What’s really awful about this situation is that the mainstream media, invested in hiding the truth, blame men for not being able to find the right girl. “You’re looking in the wrong places.” “Intelligent, classy girls don’t hang out at bars.” “Maybe you just attract the wrong kinds of people.” They can’t simply admit that females are the passive sex, built for raising babies and not much else, because doing so might hurt girls’ self-esteem… and we can’t very well have that, now can we?
2. Girls are intellectually inferior.

Several months ago, I was on Twitter killing time when some teenage girl started sending rude and insulting Tweets at me because she was offfeeennnded at my article on why most girls shouldn’t bother going to college. I initially ignored her, but when she continued to harass me, touting her “4.0 GPA” and how smart she was, I clicked through to her profile and did a little research. Turns out that this oh-so-intelligent young lady was spending $58,000 a year to major in acting. Furthermore, while she was not unattractive—she had a good bone structure, a cute face and huge… tracts of land—she was at least twenty pounds overweight, so several of my followers started calling her fat. What was her response?

She started sending pictures of herself to me in an attempt to prove she wasn’t fat.

This girl wasn’t stupid; she was clearly four or five points above the mean female IQ. But not only did she massively overrate her intelligence, she was unwilling to accept that maybe, just maybe, she had made some poor choices in life.

That is the modern “intelligent” girl; an intellectual vacuum. Her life one great big fraud from beginning to end. Despite her vaunted “smarts” and her belief that she can “do anything,” she doesn’t major in math, engineering, computer programming or any discipline that requires actual work. No, she picks a soft major like English, education or ethnic studies, where there are no standards and you can pass any nonsense in for a grade so long as you sound authoritative. She rationalizes her choices by saying that she wants to “help the children” or she’s “interested in learning,” despite the fact that all American education does is teach people to memorize Marxist nonsense and repeat it back word for word.

Claiming that girls are intelligent because they earn the majority of degrees is like saying that parrots are intelligent because the majority of them can mimic human speech.

When she graduates, assuming she isn’t spat right back into the service industry, she’ll go to work as a government bureaucrat, HR commissar, paralegal or other profession that contributes nothing to society. She’ll complain about the pay gap even as she takes every day off she can because her “head hurts” or she “needs some time off with the girls.” She’ll whine about the lack of girls in management roles even as she plans to quit her job when she has kids… but not until she’s in her thirties, of course.

After all, she wants to “have fun” first and “get it out of [her] system” before she settles down.

But it’s in her choice of hobbies that the modern “smart” girl truly exposes her vacuity. She doesn’t spend her free time reading science textbooks or perfecting her chess game: she TiVoes Teen Mom and obsesses over Lena Dunham’s cleavage. If she reads books at all, she limits herself to trashy mainstream thrillers like The Hunger Games or textual pornography like Twilight. Her weekends are spent pumping chumps for peach daiquiris at the dive bar and getting pumped by every stud who stirs her loins. Even so-called “nerd girls” are phonies, as their “nerdiness” extends to playing video games once in a blue moon or re-Tweeting charlatans like Neil deGrasse Tyson.

The only thing separating her from a ghetto baby momma is the ability to form complete sentences.

Face it: the vast majority of girls are as hollow as a drum. The three or four surplus IQ points that college-educated girls have are wasted on them, because all they’re used for is rationalizing a life of mindless consumption and sluttiness. If the modern West is a cesspool, girls are its most devoted coprophages, gulping down runny diarrhea by the bucketload with forced smiles on their faces.
3. Girls know that their “intelligence” is a lie.

As loudly as they brag about their “strength” and “independence,” girls know inside that their credentials are worthless in the eyes of men. Go back to that chubby acting major who started insulting me on Twitter. Me pointing out that her degree was worthless didn’t faze her, nor did my reminding her that she was wasting sixty grand a year for it. It was calling her fat—insulting her looks—that wounded her most deeply.

And she was so insecure that she resorted to begging for validation from me, a man she considered a “misogynist.”

The vagina is the perfect representation of the nature of females. An empty vessel, a hole, a void with no identity of its own. Without a man to fill her with his essence, she is as useless as a crabapple rotting on the sidewalk. Only by taking that essence deep inside her can she mature and become the woman she was meant to be. And filled with the wrong essence, she becomes an intellectual Typhoid Mary, mindlessly infecting others with her diseases of the mind.

That’s the problem with girls today: they’re so full of bullshit that their eyeballs are brown.

That bullshit is pumped into their skulls by men. Every advance in “women’s rights” occurs only because men allow it to occur. Women’s suffrage was only passed into law in the U.S. because leftist Protestants in the Republican Party wanted to ensure an electoral majority for Prohibition and other “social purity” policies. Sexual liberation only happened in the sixties because cowardly draft-dodging hippies, knowing they could not compete with real men for the affections of feminine women, encouraged girls to slut it up so they could get laid. The mass entry of girls into college and the workforce was instigated by corporate capitalists in order to drive down wages and smash workers’ rights.

If at any point, men had collectively told girls no, they would have quieted down and gone back to the kitchen like they were told.

So it is with the myth of female intelligence. Girls believe they are smart, worldly and cultured because men lie and white knight for them. The gelded father telling his little princess that she can be whatever she wants to be, the slack-wristed orbiter who writes sweet nothings on her Facebook posts, the hipster nancyboy who claims he wants an “equal”: they are the enemy. Without them, the Katerinas of America would gladly kneel to their Petruchios. Because these genetic discards cannot compete with legitimate men, they encourage degeneracy in the vain hope of getting their dicks wet.

Spraying the hollyhocks with lye is the only way they can propagate their diseased seed.

As men, it is our responsibility to bring girls back to their proper place. To lead them into their natural roles as wives and mothers. We men do not choose or reward girls for their clown college degrees, their meaningless cubicle jobs, or their supposed “intelligence.” We reward them for their willingness to please us and make us happy, and in doing so make themselves happy. No amount of phony education or career “success” will scratch that deep itch in a girl’s soul: the desire to serve a man.

Not a “guy,” not a “male”: a man.

Inside every Strong, Independent Woman™ is a suppliant girl yearning to break free. I say we give that girl a hand.

Mr. Enter #dunning-kruger #quack web.archive.org

So, let's talk about masks, the end all be all of stopping Covid or something. So, let's get right into the news here

Here's a 60 minutes interview with Dr. Fauci, saying the general public shouldn't wear masks https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PRa6t_e7dgI&feature=youtu.be

Here's our US surgeon general saying that we shouldn't be wearing masks on a tweet that is still up https://twitter.com/surgeon_general/status/1233725785283932160?lang=en

An Australian news service talking about masks, complete with a demonstration by a fireman who apparently went viral showing that aersols go through anything but an n95 mask which the majority of the public is not using https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZqRL1GXu5DE

I could go on and on with news reports from earlier this year, including from the CDC itself that told the general public not to wear masks. So, there's two options about this - either they were lying then or they're lying now. So, we as the general public have two options - either listen to known and admitted liars or don't wear masks.

Argument #1 against masks: Our health establishment, across the world, almost universally told people not to wear masks back then the pandemic began. The established science on masks has not changed since then. There have been no longitudinal studies or science experiments changing our understanding about them.

At best, you could argue that our health establishments lied to secure these masks for doctors and such. Under this argument, masks should still not be worn by the general public, as that need hasn't gone away. Doctors should still be the ones to primarily receive masks before the general public.

Argument #2 against masks: There are edicts (not laws. Laws require a process to be enacted) about requiring masks. None of these edicts require specific kinds of masks. I've heard people say "you can use anything to make a mask." This is one of the stupidest things that I've ever heard. A "Wear your fucking mask" person even suggested a scarf. Ignoring the fact that it is now July, and even in the northern United States we're experiencing 90 degree weather on the daily, scarves generally have holes in them, which do nothing to prevent aersolized droplets from getting through. Many of the masks you can buy on amazon specifically come with disclaimers stating that they do not provide protection from Covid, but you're allowed to go in public areas with those masks and no one bats an eye. This is even ignoring that in some places in the United States, we do have anti-mask laws. As in, if you obscure your face, you can be arrested. Good thing we don't live in an environment in which police officers would just love to abuse that little fact. http://www.anapsid.org/cnd/mcs/maskcodes.html

Do you want to know the worst thing? Someone wearing a mask made from like an old t-shirt or something, thinking that they're safe... and doing more risky behavior. Going out more, making them more likely to get the disease and spread it. If you tell me that "anything can work for a mask" you are objectively wrong and I designate not to listen to you. n95 masks go through a specific processes that your sewing machine is not capable of.

Argument #3 against masks: People are stupid. People who think they're safe tend to be even more stupid and let their guard down. According to the science, last time I checked, we're supposed to stay 6 feet apart (2 meters in Metricland). However, when we talk, we're supposed to have an even greater distance because the droplets go even further. Guess when most people take off their masks? That's right, when they're talking.

I heard someone say that they borrowed a relative's mask. That is about exactly as hygienic as using someone else's underwear. Bet you didn't wash it either. Wearing a disposable mask twice is like wearing a disposable condom or diaper twice. Cloth masks (that do not stopped aeroslized droplets) must be washed after every use or they become more of a health hazard than they create. They trap moisture. Moisture becomes a petri dish.

You ever touch the inside of your mask with unwashed hands? You ever not wash your hands after taking the mask off? This is my favorite one because it happens the most - you ever only put the mask on your mouth and don't cover your nose? A mouth that's closed doesn't spread droplets anywhere near as far as your nose.

Do you want me to go on? Do you put your mask on before you enter a store and take it off as soon as you leave? Welp, you got the bacteria from your car keys, the car door, anything inside the car, and who knows what else on the mask... and on your face. And if you take it off as soon as you leave - guess what - all store bacteria is on your face as well.

This compounds with the problem of security theater. I repeat, if you think that you're safe and you're not, you take risks you otherwise shouldn't. By improperly wearing or handling a mask, you create more of a health risk. Rule 1 to not catch Coronavirus - don't touch your face. Masks require you to. Actual surgeons wash their hands before putting it on and taking it off.

Argument #4 against masks: Heat stroke and sweat. Your body gets out excess heat via various orifices. Your nose and your mouth can do a great deal to help with that. When you have a mask on, the heat is trapped there. Yes, they make breathable masks. Any mask that breathable is likely to do nothing to stop the spread of Covid. There are mainly two things that can happen in this case. Number one, it can cause heat stroke.

You know what heat stroke is like? It's not pretty and it can kill you. It also requires immediate medical treatment, which as you might know, is in short supply in some areas. Here's a question - how many high profile cases of heat stroke do you think it would take to get these mask edicts removed?

But let's not get so drastic. Your body has other ways of getting rid of heat. That being sweat. Sweats are droplets, which spread droplet based diseases like Covid19. This is the reason that gyms are still closed. Yeah, certain Asian cultures do wear masks when people are sick. Flu and cold seasons tend to be the winter, where it's cold and this usually isn't as much of a problem.

But no, even some Asian cultures are saying no to masks - https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jul/01/south-korea-incidents-of-covid-19-mask-rage-flareas-summer-heats-up. If the South Koreans can't handle masks in the summer, do you really think the rest of the world will? If I need to remind you, South Korea was the country that was so determined to beat the coronavirus when their contact tracing pointed out a gay bar it created a wave of homophobia. https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexandrasternlicht/2020/05/12/with-new-covid-19-outbreak-linked-to-gay-man-homophobia-on-rise-in-south-korea/#2bce2b404909#2bce2b404909. Some South Koreans are refusing to wear masks so much it's starting actual fist fights, because to get someone to wear a mask or a fucking scarf in 80-90 degree weather is unreasonable, unless you want to have a heat stroke pandemic on your hands and dropping compliance.

You go out on a hot day and no one is wearing a mask. And let me tell you, when it comes to something like civil disobedience like this, it becomes easier and easier. How many people shot off illegal fireworks on the fourth? Yeah, how many of those people do you think are going to keep going along with all of this? You can only ask people so much before it turns unreasonable. Here's some sciency stuff about masks and such https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7087880/

Argument #5 against masks: Here's a little bit of a wager for you. Either masks are effective (enough) or they're right, right? Those can be the only two options, right. If they're not effective, then any mask ordinance is... useless at best. If masks are useful... then things like the lockdowns and removing people's right to an education is useless at best. Are masks useful? If yes, then we don't need lockdowns. If masks aren't useful enough to make lockdowns useless then they're not useful. I was told repeatedly that we could just sit in lockdown forever and ever. We can't, but it's nice to live in a fairytale once in awhile.

Argument #6 against masks: A different kind of social distancing. I don't like what our culture is becoming. People nowadays, especially online, where most of us are, have stopped seeing other people as people, but... walking vectors of disease. That's not a good way to live. It's an incredibly dangerous way to live, actually. And masks... make the problem worse. Do you know what kind of communication a smile is? What it can really do for a human interaction. It's not something that you can do behind a mask. Most of our emotional communication comes from the mouth. When everyone is locked off from each other it creates an emotional distance, on top of the physical one.

And people are already... literally killing each other out there. This is not something we need more of. It's become incredibly dangerous. I can't imagine the kind of mental illnesses that we're instilling the youngest generation with. The generation after Z, I think they're called "Alpha" (which uh... doesn't make sense but okay) is being born into this. This is going to end up defining their generation; I could imagine a lot of... trust issues, nevermind obsessive compulsive tendencies. When young people have trust issues they tend to turn to violence or... drugs and alcohol, or they completely withdraw.

Argument #7 against masks: Mental health. I'm going to make this one quick. Masks are and do have a hellish effect on some people's mental health. For example, if someone has PTSD from being strangled, then it's probably going to be a trigger. It's not as simple as just "oh, it's a stupid piece of cloth." It's more like "I woke up during a surgery in more pain than I've ever felt in my life and medical masks bring me right back to that time" or "I was gagged when they kidnapped me and brutalized me." I'm not going to go deep into this, because for the past few months society has finally decided to become honest about how they don't give a fuck about mental health in the slightest.

Argument #8 against masks: Poverty. Again I'm going to make this quick, because as established, society has a whole has been honest with how they don't give a shit. Masks that actually work are in short supply. Short supplies causes prices to rise if demand doesn't fall. Getting ahold of masks that actually work becomes harder, especially for the more impoverished of us. Preventing people from going into locations based on their inability to procure this can count as discrimination against the poor. Yes, they can make something out of... rubbish. But as established that's not really effective. So, in turn, you'll only have the more well-off people with masks that actually work, which, once again, is discrimination. I supposed you could give them out for free. But we have shortages of PPE and the free stuff should probably go to the doctors and hospitals, right?

--------------------------------------------------------

So, please keep telling me to wear a mask that just might be illegal that you don't know if I can afford while you wear one made of an old bath towel filled with mildew that you never wash. It's what the science says after all, after they've said repeatedly to not wear masks unless you yourself are sick. Keep wishing that people who aren't wearing masks get and die of Covid, without realizing that masks don't keep you safe. They're meant to keep others safe. If you keep fiddling with them and putting them on without washing your hands, you're more likely to die of Covid than someone who has never worn a mask ever.

And please, keep taking down your masks to shout at people so you know they can hear you being a hypocrite. I'd prefer someone who never wears a mask than someone up their ass about how everyone should wear a mask without knowing how they do or don't work. It really makes you look like you're on the moral right about this whole thing. If you hope I get Covid, I hope you get heat stroke. Hell, I can even claim the moral high ground because heat stroke isn't contagious.

RetroSpriteResources #sexist forum.deviantart.com

So about two dozen women jumped on me because I'm pro-life and won't stop threatening me, cursing me out and spamming my page.

They have threatened to shove a cactus up my ass, cut off my dick and balls, force me to drink their period blood and much more.

On top of that, they have been accusing me of being a rapist, saying that I abuse my wife and even accused me of wanting to sexually abuse an anime girl because I uploaded a picture of her in a bikini in a parody journal.

They've also been sexually harassing me because they THINK they can get away with sexual harassment because they're female. They've been asking me for sex in a sarcastic, taunting way, they've been discussing what my penis tastes like and one even said she fapped to the idea of me getting raped by body builders.

They've been recruiting new women to harass me by the day by spamming a photoshopped comment where I say that I want rape to be legalized. They made me lose a great friend this way and made an alternate account making fun of me, as well as offensive memes with an ugly drawing of my face.

Please, I don't want rape to be legalized and I don't hate women. I'm only pro-life, is that really so bad? Do I really deserve all this abuse just because I don't support the mass slaughter of babies? People didn't treat the World War 2 vets this way after they stopped the Nazis from mass slaughtering the Jews.

These women are nothing but a bunch of disgusting sluts. You wanna know what I really said about legalized rape? I said that it should be legal to rape sluts because it's their fault rape is a problem to begin with. But I don't think that rape should be legal unless it's against your spouse or a slut.

Please, ban all these women!

Queen Adira #racist blackliberationlovenunity.wordpress.com

Your brain and body can’t function without Black Melanin! Few people know what Melanin, the pigment that colors the skin & hair, is found in almost every organ of the body and is necessary in order for the brain and nerves to operate, the yes to see, and the human body ot reproduce! At the core of your brain is found the “locus coeruleus,” a structure that is BLACK because it contains large amounts of (neuro) Melanin which is essential for it to operate! In fact, all the most crucial brain structures are heavily melanized!

Melanin in the brain increases from the lower primates and reaches its peak in the BLACK HUMAN. “All humans possess this Black internal brain evidence of their common Black African Origin. The All Black neuromelanin nerve tract of the brain is profound proof that the human race is a Black race, with many variations of Black, from Black-Black to Whtie-Black, all ineranally rooted in a vast sea of Brain Blackness.” Dr. Richard King * Melanin i sthe chemical key to life itself! * It is the major organizng molecule for living systems! * It’s found everywhere! -in animals, plnats (that’s why raisins are brown), soil, oceans, clounds even stars & comets! * It is essentially linked to the DNA of the genes! * It shows the potential to reproduce itself!

Black Melanin is necssary in order for humans to reproduce! Melanin is present at the inception of life: a Melanin sheath covers both the sperm and the egg! In the human embryo, the melanocytes (skin pigment cells), brain and nerve cells all originate from the same place; the neural crest. Melanocytes resemble nerve celss and are ssential for conveying energy. When Melanin is missing or insufficient in the ectoderm of the early embryo (blastula),this causes the mother to lose her baby; in the case of whites, a defective baby is produced. Black Melanin is the super absorber of all forms of energy. It has “black hole” properties. It can convert light to sound and back again!

It stores, transforms and conducts energy! The color of Black is the perfect absorber of light and all energy frequencies, giving Black Melanin thse properties! Thsus scientists describe Melanin as acting like a “black hole.” Melanin can rearrange its chemical structure to absorb ALL wavelengths of energy (sunlight, X-rays, music, radar) and can transmute and store this energy for later use! In The Isis Papers, Dr. Cress Welsing writes that Melanin gives us the ability to use our bodies as direct connections witht he God Force, the source of all Energy -like plugging a cord into a wall socket. It also gives our hair antennae-like ability.

How does Melanin cause racial differences? The science of Genetics shows that Blacks can produce all races but it is impossible for a brown, yellow or white race to produce a black race. A Japanese scientist showed that inside melanocytes (pigment cells) are tiny packets called melanosomes that contatin melanin. The four stages in the maturing of thse melanosomes counts for racial differences:

Stage 1: The melanosome is empty & doesn’t have the machinery to make melanin.

Stage 2: The melanosome has the machinery to make melanin, but is empty
of melanin.

Stage 3: The machinery is there and the melasosome is half filled with
melanin.

Stage 4: The machinery is there and the melanosome is completely filled
with melanin.

Whites have mainly stages 1 & 2, whereas all people of color have
melanin, with Blacks having more of stage 4.

Other amazing facts about Black Melanin:

* Melanin granules are “central computers” and may analyze and initiate
body responses without reporting to the brain! * Melanin slows aging & protects you from damming effects of sunlight. The darker your skin (genetically) the less it ages. Thus whites often have wrinkled skin in there 30s while Blacks often have smooth, unwrinkled skin even in “old” age. * All people of color have Melanin circulating in the blood due to spllage from the melanosomes (Melanin packets). *People containing high levels of Melanin (mainly Blacks) will always show a positve test for the use of marijuana! The chemical species found in the urine which indicates someone’s use of marijuana is also found in the urine of Blacks! * The Melanin molecule is so stable that it has been found in 150-million-year-old dinosaur fossils! It is highly resistant to chemical and physical analysis, this its precise structure is unknown!

“BLACKNESS” is a divine, cosmic principle of the Universe. BLACK is the meaning of Kam or Khem -the name which the ancient Egyptians called themselves. From this word we get “Chemistry,” the study of the building blocks of Life. Life is founded upon CARBON, the Black element present in all living matter. Black carbon atoms link to form Black Melanin, which has “Black Hole” properties! Black Holes are found at hte center of our own galaxy and countelss others. In physics, a “Black Body” isknown to be a perfect absorber and perfect radiator of all forms of light and energy. This “Black Body Radiation” is at work in the electron, as shown by Nobel prize winner, Richard Feynman.

The electron is responsible for ALL “Khem-ical” changes in matter. It has been present since the creation of the universe. The scientist, Jean Charaon proved that the electron has all the properties of the Black Hole, plus it exchanges “Black Photons” with other electrons, enabling it to continuously accumalate data. This means that if we view the electron as a carrier of memory, it has experienced everything in creation since the very beginning. Blackness is fundamental to the operation of the universe of Engery. God is the Giver of All Energy: “Blackness” (not darkness) allows the perfect reception of all wavelengths of Energy

Melanin gives Black people superior physical, mental & spiritual ability. Melanin refines the nervous system in such a way that messages from the brain reach other areas of the body most rapidly in Black people, the Original People. Black infants sit, stand, crawl and walk sooner than whites, and demonstarte more advanced cognitive skills than their white counterparts because of their abundance of Melanin. Carol Barnes writes “…your mental processes (brain power) are controlled by the same chemical that gives Black humans their superior physical (atheltics, rhythmic dancing) abilities. This chemical… is Melanin!” The abundance of Melanin in Black humans produces a superior organism physically, mentally and spiritiually. This why all the founders of the world’s great religions are Black. Melanin is the neuro-chemical basis for what is called SOUL in Black people. In the same way Blacks excel in athletics, they can excel in all other areas as well (like they did in the past!) once the road blocks are removed!

Is God Black? The Original Man was BLACK, “made in the IMAGE of God” his Parent, according to scared books. Children look like their parents. All the other races are but diluted variations of the Original Black Race. Most whites have calcified pineal glands which thwarts Melatonin production, therby limiting their moral capacity. Located in the brain, the tiny pineal & pituitary glands regulate the body’s other glands. Esoteric tradion regards the area of these glands as the third eye, seat of the soul, and the mystical Uraeus represented by the cobra on the forehead of Egyptian royalty/crowns. Why did Africans view the European as a child of God, but the Europeans viewed the African as a soulless savage? Because of “melatonin,” described as a mentally & morally stimulating humanizing hormone produced by the pineal gland.

Scientific research reveals that most whites are unable to prduce much melatonin because their pineal glands are often calcified and nonfunctioning. Pineal calcification rateswith Africans si 5-15%; Asians – 15-25%; Europeans -60-80%! This is the chemical basis for the cultural diffences between Blacks and whites, causing some Black scholars to raise the question that the European approach, that of the logical, erect, ridgid, anti-feeling posture, reflects a left brain orientation and reflects that they lack the chemical key of melatonin to turn on their unconscious and therefore cannot get into feelings. Carol Barnes writes “Melanin is responsible for the existence of civilization, philosophy, religion, truth, justice, and righteousness. Individuals (whites) containing low levels of Melanain will behave in a barbaric manner.” Melanin give humans the ability to FEEL because it is the absorber of all frequencies of energy.

Dr. Welsing wrties “Since melanin is a superior absorber of all energy , it is essential to establish this understanding of God and ‘all energy.’ The fact thaat the albinos (whties) lack melanin may also help to explain …why, in the view of many non-white peooples, they (whit4es) lack ‘spirituality” and the capacity to tune in to, and therby establish harmony and justice…”

The scientific evidence of Melanin threatens the ideology of white supremacy. After considering Melain to be a “waste” product of body-metabolism which “served no useful function,” Western (white) science has now discovered that Melanin is the chemical key to life and the brain itself! All studies and facts about Melanin suggest that after 400 years of attempting to inferiorize the Black race, “Western science is facing the sobering reality that, by its own self-defined standards, Black people are probably superior to whites in both intellectual potential and muscle Coordination.” (Sepia magazine interview). The central role Melanin plays in the body has been “suppressed to maintain the mythological inferiority of blacks…and the defensive clinging to whiteness as some token of superiority.” (Dr. Richard King)

The “superiority complex” of white people is a defense mechanism and a mas for their deepset inferiority complex which they project onto people of color. Psychologists say insistent denial means readlity in the opposite way. If whites really believed that white skin was “superior,” why is “tanning” so important in white culture despite its known health risks (thousands die annually from skin cancer). Also, curling or permming lifeless, straight hair, and the lastest; lip injections for a fuller look! And it is the white female who tells you that her ideal mate is “tall, DARK, and handsome!” “Dark” indeed refers to more Melanin!

Jim #sexist blog.jim.com

[Part 3/end, goddammit Jim]

At the time of Jesus, it was the temple, and Jesus famously abrogated this. But the rabbis of the time were engaged in a holiness spiral, which holiness spiral Jesus often vehemently denounced, which holiness spiral led them into suicidal war with the Romans, literally suicidal as they wound up murdering each other and killing themselves, as holiness spirals so frequently end, so we cannot take temple practice at the time of Jesus as indicative of the will of Gnon, or the practice of earlier times. Jesus said no, and they perished. Both of these are good indicators that you are not following the will of Gnon.

What we can take as indicative of the family law of earlier times of those peoples who survived is the wisdom books of earlier times, in particular the Book of Proverbs. Wisdom books were issued by governments to advise their subjects about the private and quasi private incentives for good behavior that were in effect – hence “the wisdom of Solomon”. And according to the section of the Book of Proverbs that claims to have been issued by the court of King Solomon, the incentive for not sleeping with someone else’s women was not that the government would kill you, nor that the temple would kill you, but that the rightful owner of that woman’s sexual and reproductive capability might kill you, and would have every right to do so, legally and openly. So, the Wisdom of Solomon (and of subsequent Kings that repeatedly re-issued that book) is that honor killing is fine. Which is a good indicator of the will of Gnon, since that is a people that survived and of the will of God, since that is the way that Old Testament law on adultery was implemented.

The book of Proverbs has different sections, as it was re-issued by King after King, government after government. But none of the sections threaten state or temple penalties for sexual misconduct, nor do any of the sections drop the Solomonic privately administered death penalty for sexual misconduct, indicating laws on sexual conduct that gave the maximum sexual possible liberty to men, short of allowing one man to tread on another man’s toes, and the minimum possible sexual liberty to women. Since, to form families, men need to conquer, and women to be conquered, such laws are optimal for family formation and reproduction. Such also prevent conflict within the elite (King George the Fourth) and between the elite and the people, by preventing men from competing for women’s favors, by preventing women from giving such favors, thus are optimal for social cohesion. Hence peoples with such laws are apt to invade, and not themselves be invaded. Which is handy if you have high elite fertility as a result of such laws.

So, in Old Testament times, if a man abducted a woman who was not married or betrothed, he was allowed to keep her, and if she was virgin before the abduction, required to keep her, and if she ran away to some other man, he was allowed to kill her and that other man. This is consistent with observed present day behavior of men and women, which indicates descent from populations with severe restraint on female sexual choice, and weak restraint on male sexual choice – indicates that we are descended from peoples who had laws like that, and that peoples more tolerant of female sexual choice failed to reproduce or were conquered and genocided. Our biological character indicates that among the populations from which we are descended male sexual choice was only restricted to the extent necessary to prevent one man’s choice from impinging on another man’s choice, while female sexual choice was almost nonexistent, indicating that Old Testament law, as interpreted and applied by the wisdom of Solomon in the Book of Proverbs, is the will of Gnon, the will of Nature and of Nature’s God.

The Book of Proverbs goes on about sexual misconduct at considerable length. And it describes the reality that I see, not the reality that people keep gaslighting me with. In the Book of Proverbs, sexual misconduct is primarily the result of lustful women manipulating naive men in order to obtain socially disruptive sex. There are no grooming gangs in the Book of Proverbs. Women sexually manipulate men in order to obtain sex in socially disruptive and damaging ways. Men do not sexuality manipulate women. Though the dance is pursuit and predation, conquest and surrender, as if lustful men were imposing themselves on sexless angels, that is the dance not the reality. The reality is that women and girls are lustfully manipulating men and their social environment to obtain social outcomes that in some ways superficially resemble lustful men imposing themselves on sexless angels. That is what the Book of Proverbs depicts, and that is what I see in front of my nose. And yet I live in a world where everyone with astonishing confidence and enormous certainty reports a very different world, a world of men sexually harassing and raping women, a world where male sexual predators lure innocent sexless female children. When I report the world that I see and experience, which is the world depicted in the Book of Proverbs, which is the world that the famous Wisdom of Solomon depicts, some people get very angry.

I have been writing this post over a couple of days. Last night I threw a big expensive party, at which party I played the role of the big high status male, and the highest status male guest, a colleague of my girlfriend’s father, very courteously played along. This morning one of the party girls, who is fertile age but only very recently fertile age, and unfortunately very closely connected to my current girlfriend and that high status male, was still around. This morning, after this post was mostly written and the remaining guests mostly sober, I left for the beach for a swim with my girlfriend. And by coincidence, party girl just happened to decide to put on a bikini that she only recently came to need, and to take a swim shortly after I and my girlfriend left, joining us at the beach. And whenever I remained stationary and facing in a particular direction for any length of time, this young party girl, dressed in a bikini, would find some reason to hang around in that line of vision. You may recall that in my posts on testosterone and weight loss, I have frequently remarked that I have difficulty out-staring a pizza and a pitcher of Mountain Dew.

For men to cooperate effectively, as for example in genociding their less cooperative neighbors and taking their land, they have to keep their hands off each other’s women, and enforce keeping each other’s hands off each other’s women. And since women are notoriously apt to find clever ways to give sneaky fuckers a chance, particularly sneaky fuckers in authority, in order to enforce keeping each other’s hands off each other’s women, they have to enforce each other’s authority over each other’s women. That is why when a group of males moves in on a group of women to attempt a pickup, they first have to agree in advance which of them is going to score which girl so that the girls cannot play them off against each other.

Conversely, the first thing a sneaky fucker in authority or in a position of status is going to do is undermine other men’s authority over their women, even though this strategy is apt to backfire on himself, as it backfired on King George the Fourth.

Romance is an escape hatch out of the tenth commandment. Supposedly it is OK to fuck other men’s women if that is what they want. Tingles supposedly make sex holy, and a woman should supposedly always get whatever man gives her tingles. So a woman can have sex with every man who gives her tingles, which is apt to be a disturbingly large number of men, and stop having sex with any man who stops giving her tingles, who is apt to be the father of her children.

Well I have bad news: Your women, including your daughters starting at a startlingly early age, always want to fuck some strange man because there is always some man higher status than you, so this escape hatch out of the tenth commandment is always going to burn you. Therefore any group of men that allows this escape hatch out of the tenth commandment is always going to perish in the long run. And any time someone claiming high status tells you that your women are not going to be tempted to fuck some high status male, provided you are sufficiently holy, or sufficiently progressive, or sufficiently manly, sufficiently patriarchal, or sufficiently antisexist, or sufficiently loving, is more interested in sneak fucking your wife than in the survival of the group to which he belongs.

These are the real optics: Nobody likes the weak horse, white knighting women and girls as sexless angels looks weak, and sneaky fuckers need killing even if, like William Duke of Acquitaine, they are far from weak.

Illustrious_Try #fundie reddit.com

Re: Sex Before Kissing: How 15-Year-Old Girls Are Dealing With Porn-Obsessed Boys

Fascinating. I didn't know the US had already degenerated to this level although I suspected something along these lines.

15 year old girls should be kept seperate from boys their age or at least supervised. At that age boys have levels of testosterone exceeding even that of violent adult males. I recall thinking about sex or something sex-related almost all the time when I was that age. It faded as puberty ended of course, but pubescent males are basically drugged up on a powerful aphrodisiac drug that also makes them aggressive and impulsive.

The media and liberalism have made it normal for 15 year olds to have sex. The truth is that as much as the hormones tell them to have sex at that age, they're just not mentally and emotionally ready for it.

I don't know about full segregation, but we at least need to be talking about this on a societal level, in comprehensive sex ed classes, etc... & parents are going to have to get over their squeamishness over talking about sex with their kids. As for the last part, I am grateful that I was strong willed & had strong boundaries at 15, because I ended up hearing too many cautionary tales that involved girls who didn't.

At that age boys want to have sex with anything female that moves. Liberalism has normalised sex for all ages to such a degree that it's now bordering on pedophilia.

These days when a teacher has sex with a student it's not even seen as wrong anymore. It's called a sex romp these days. Even when the kid later comes out and feels seduced and abused, the media will often still speak of it as a sex romp instead of rape. The media has created this sense that rules are meant to be broken, that no means yes if you try hard enough and that 'bad boys' are real men.

Too many women put up with it though. These boys become fuckboys in adulthood and consider relationship gatekeeping as a tool to get women to have sex with them. They don't see women as persons proper, just as delectable creatures with warm, soft and moist holes for them to stick their penises in. It was bound to happen at some point though I mean women are objectified just about all the time. I wonder if women are aware of it.

For example I'm sure a bikini is nice to wear but it's effectively the same as being naked, Almost everything of interest is already on display if women wear it, so any time a man wants to ogle women who are stripped almost bare, he can just go to the beach and have his fill.

While there is definitely a faction of pedos trying to normalize their behavior, I really am not convinced that 'liberalism' is wholly to blame for this- people practice child marriage in many of the most socially conservative societies on earth. Even here in the US, FLDS(a breakaway sect of Mormonism) members practice child marriage, & I myself met several girls under 16 who were married off, legally(with 'parental consent'), to much older men in fundamentalist evangelical christian communities. I am not convinced that any of those marriages turned out well. I can't remember who said it, but there was some quote to the effect that many right wing guys consider women private property, but left wing guys consider women public property. I wish what I have observed in my own life convinced me otherwise, but it doesn't.

I don't believe that all men engage in this or are responsible for it, but then they don't really have to- one of the greatest myths is that it takes a majority to influence social trends or societal expectations. As for swimwear/beachwear, my own choices just aren't centered around men's preferences at all- I don't care for hot, crowded beaches, so I'm usually in swimwear either because I'm going for a relaxing swim, or I'm doing some other sort of activity. Neither bikinis, nor the 'burkinis' that are positioned opposite them are actually optimal for any of the activities I like to do...trying to swim, dive, or stay on a board while I'm having to worry about a boob popping out, or dealing with so much extra fabric I might as well be wearing a beekeeper costume doesn't appeal to me. If I wanted to wear lingerie, I would wear lingerie, & I wouldn't be trying to swim in it.

I'm a nihilist and marxist. I'm not coming from the religious angle here (although most men who blame liberalism are so I understand why you would assume that). I'm not trying to say what came before wasn't extremely bad. I mentioned liberalism because as an ideology it's just bad on almost all fronts. I'm anti totalitarian but do believe in a little bit of authoritarianism/illiberalism when needed. Of course I believe in limits to such authoritarianism, I'm of the opinion that some rights are sacred, including right to bodily integrity, as well as the sovereignty of the self, and should be beyond legislation.

Left wing guys who think women are public property are just crazed tankies. Mao used to force people to do everything communally, including take showers together, sleep (not have sex, just sleep) in same room.

There's this thing called dialectical materialism. Some ideas come from the material realm, that is to say the ideas are thought up to justify the material conditions. Right wingers and left wing traitors will come up with ideas to justify the oppression of certain groups, just like how the rich like to claim the poor are lazy and that they are the parasites of society, etc.

Berniebros and common leftists don't even know what marxism is and have never read Das Kapital let alone excerpts of it. Marx says that society is divided into classes. There are the owner classes and then there are the proletariat classes, or simply the proletariat. These workers are exploited and forced to sell their labour as well as their body in certain conditions, to survive.

In a sense, men women and children alike are objectified. Men and children were worked in mines, used like disposable tools and were discarded of when their bodies were destroyed or outlived their usefulness. Women same thing, but also exploited in sexual manner. Men were sent to war like living meat bags to be shot up and bleed to death and die a few years later of PTSD if they survived.

Marx, meant not just labour but oppression as a class. That's why he makes it so very clear that there are the oppressed classes and the capitalist owner class doing the oppression.

Berniebros and so forth don't know anything about Marx, they just want a bailout for their student loans and useless college degrees. (I do think student loan debt has to be restructured though because it's abundantly clear that it's set up as a slavery ring)

BlkPillPres #sexist #psycho incels.co

Its Over Even For Rapists

Raping a foid these days does practically no harm to her physically or mentally unless you are rough or physically violent on purpose (punching, stabbing, "going in dry", etc). She’s already defiled and ruined from all her past sexual experiences, your "skills" aren't sufficient enough to really inflict any kind of trauma in these modern times.

This is the thing people don't get, in the past if a woman did not retain her virginity she was unworthy of marriage, if you had raped a woman you had defiled her and basically ruined her entire life, as a woman had no financial or educational opportunities, her entire life path is getting married and having children. Raping a virgin woman = destroying her entire life, that's why it was treated as such a horrible crime (well that's the historical context of why, today the outrage stems from leftist politics). If you raped a woman in the past you weren't just harming someone and then they move on after years of dealing with the mental trauma, that was the end of their life, a few seconds of pleasure for you, a lifetime of destitution for her.

Not to mention that she has never experienced sex before, so she isn't going to be "used to" anything, the most painful aspects of sex to her will be truly experienced, also the most pleasurable aspects (she will likely orgasm).

But most women today are whores, I would not be surprised if some rapists literally couldn't stay erect with some women because they realized they were doing nothing to her, she was obviously disgusted by you and afraid, but she was so loose and showed so little reaction to the penetration that you became disheartened by your own performance :feelskek:. Unless you are packing like 8+ inches (with significant girth), you can't be a true "power rapist" (as in a rapist that gets off and over powering women physically and mentally, a primarly goal being forced pleasure/orgasm), you'll realize you aren't really "cutting it", a lot of these women have been in gangbangs during college years, had 20+ partners, etc before a rapist even encounters them.

Seriously wtf can he even do to a vag with that much dick experience, what can he do to a psyche that is already that ravaged, these bitches have already done nasty shit like swallowing multiple loads from various men, eating Chads ass out, etc, so when an average guy rapes them and he is sticking to forced vaginal penetration (in this case a "frenzy rapist"), what kind of mental trauma can he truly hope to inflict, the bitch has already done even more disgusting and revolting shit than any "frenzy rapist" can hope to do with the limited time constraint of the act (frenzy rape is usually quick and takes place in public, usually vaginal due to ease of access and lack of resitance e.g. public bathroom at a club/bar). He can't really do anything to her, her body is already defiled as though she was raped, you can't "un-rape" her, its over even for the average rapist :feelskek:, you can't out perform all of her collective sexual experience, she'll cry, she'll feel bad, but at the end of the day she'll get over it, and rather quikcly too in comparison to women of the past who never would get over it at all.

The only way to truly make an impact as a rapist is to impregnate her, but then again she can just go to an abortion clinic and poof that's the end of that (or take a morning after pill to prevent the pregnancy to begin with). So unless you are strictly a "pleasure rapist" (just raping for your own personal pleasure, the mindset of the female is irrelevant to you) you are wasting your time even trying to rape, why bother, you won't even meet the minimum requirements to achieve your intended goal.

ITS OVER FOR RAPISTS

BlackLieutenant #fundie intjforum.com

Women's Sexuality Is Meaningless Without Men


[Sexuality emerges in stages from the very earliest years of life, when a child discovers that there is something 'down there' and starts to feel around, on through to puberty, and onward from that point to mature understanding of their own and others' sexuality (in an ideal trajectory). Many, many factors can damage that trajectory, social norms being particularly strong.]

First masturbations, especially for girls, can hardly be described has a "sexuality".

Masturbation is "hardly" having a sexuality. And girls and boys sexuality is very different. Girls that has vaginas and can masturbate earlier than boys. But we can't really call it "sexuality", but more "curiosity" (they're not sexually active).
Boys can't really experience sexuality until they produce sperm around early puberty, so for boys it's kinda simple. Personally when I ejaculated the first time, I was 12, I don't think I could've done it earlier.

[Then what can the discovery of what brings your body to orgasm be described as? And, yes, the purpose of masturbation is orgasm. When she feels that sensation and perues it, she's exploring and interacting with her sexuality.]


Female sexuality is different from males. If I'm right, they can experience orgasm before (and after) being sexually active, which is very weird from a natural POV... I don't really thought about this before, but that brings a lot of questions.

Women pleasure is apparently not linked to her sexuality. Whereas men pleasure is completely linked to his sexuality. Do women really "have" a sexuality ? Do these orgasms aren't just illusions to support "men's sexuality" ?


[http://www2.hu-berlin.de/sexology/GE...S/CHILDORG.HTM Your amazing knowledge of female sexuality must surely give you a suave way with Teh Ladeez.]


I still don't think that female orgasm is a "sexuality", if they can have it before and after being "sexually" active, you can't call it "sexuality". I stick to my theory that women doesnt have one, and that female orgasm is just an evolutionary function to make them appreciate "men" sexuality. I can be wrong though.

Men "have" to dominate. We have to dominate animals to get food, we have to dominate our enemies, dangers etc...we have to sexually dominate women to reproduce. Domination is a whole part of what men are.


[1) I love how you're putting human females on the same list as animals, enemies and natural disasters. Like women are 'things' that must be 'done unto.' That's great. (Not.)]


This is not what I meant, humans have to survive through eating and reproducing, so from a male perspective, it's through animals and women


[2) It also implies that, like animals, enemies, and avalanches, women are going to resist the man's efforts. "Get over here, Matilda, it's penis time." "No, no, no!" "I said GET OVER HERE, Tillie. We gotta keep populating the goddamn human race. Don't you try and run out on me!" "NO! NO!" "Shaddup." "Let me go!" "Sorry, kiddo. Gotta dominate ya. I'm a man."]


No not especially with rape, but even in consensual sex, the woman is dominated, because she is penetrated.


[3) But one of your core beliefs appears to be that women are naturally submissive. So why would a man have to dominate someone who has already lain back with stars in her eyes? And if he loves her (and is vanilla), why would he want to?]


Women learn through time and evolution to be submissive, it's not "natural", but I think it's more an evolutionary attitute that was necessary. I assume the submissive ones was the one getting fucked, so maybe women adopted this attitude for procreation/to be attractive. Or maybe they were forced because men were raping them, I don't know. But this attitude is still clearly visible today.


[4) And all of the above is assuming you're even correct that men have to dominate things. You can get food by working WITH the earth instead of against it (e.g. biodynamic farming, free-range animal husbandry, humane slaughtering methods). You can deflect and self-defend against enemies without needing to destroy them. You can (gasp!) have fun in bed with your woman. She'll still get just as pregnant, if that's what you want]


When men wanna have wheat to eat it they have to cut it (kill it), when they wanna eat beef, they have kill it (even if it's nicely), and when there's a venomous snake or a crocodile going next to his 3-year old kid, the man will not just "push it" nicely, he "has" to kill it to be sure the dangerous animals won't come again. And for sex, I never said women shouldnt have fun, but she is dominated (not raped) in any case, because the penetration is domination.


[Yeah, in fantasy, sure. In the "real life" which you believe you're so in touch with, men carry around a significant degree of fear that they're not going to be good enough to be chosen, not going to be hard enough to penetrate, not going to be big enough to satisfy.
Or as the inestimable sage Rihanna put it,
The desire to find a "submissive" woman is the desire to avoid being straight-up challenged like that. The desire to believe that all women are "naturally" submissive, and any woman who thinks otherwise has been manipulated, is complete self-delusion.]


Men that haven't got erectile problems don't ask these questions to themselves (maybe when they turn 50). The "be chosen" part is before the sex, and has nothing to do with the sexual act.

The submissive women love from men just means higher chances to get laid, and more feminine, it has nothing to do with "good, she'll accept my little non-erectile dong when I'll try to get her orgasms". The world is not turning around women desires. And I never said that "all" women are submissive but a big majority, and even if some are not, that's how most men like them.

Some feminists like to say "weak men like submissive women", this is a lot of BS. The submissive women are the ones getting married and laid, that may be why these dry feminists try to turn these women into "strong-dominant" masculine women to be like them.

Look at black women, their feminist non-submissive attitude is the reason why 70% of them are single and 42% never been married. As a black man, I can tell you this is a widely known fact in our community. A lot of white, black western men now have go to China, Russia, Latin America to get their "feminine" submissive women. A black friend is getting married with a chinese woman this year, we talked about it, he is in this case. Sad.

[In other words, you mean black women are insufficiently interested in flattering men's egos.

Gosh, that's horrible. How did blacks survive in the millennia before the diaspora, when black women were the only women around!?!! How do black men who are still on the African continent manage!?? Clearly, the UN needs to start a task force to address this urgent problem. Funds must be raised to enable black men in Africa to import properly submissive females from Thailand.]


American black women were fine and feminine before feminism corrupted them. African non-westernized women are still feminine.

How Black Women SHOULD Treat Black Men



Black men are also responsible for being overrepresented in thugs, prison population, leaving their children alone with their moms, taking drugs, being uneducated, dealing drugs, being affliated with gangs etc...

But responsible black men like me don't find these "strong" "independant" black women attractive. I also find them repulsive physically, I prefer caucasian females so I'm kinda biased... The only black woman I've dated was mixed and was very feminine. A rarity among black women.

PS : I do advocate equal rights, but there's a point where western women "have" to do kids.

[How about if I said to you, "American blacks were fine before the civil rights movement corrupted them"?

There are lots of white Americans who believe this is true. There are lots of white Americans who much preferred to have blacks living under segregation and treating white people with automatic respect lest the Klan pay a visit to their house that night.

These folks became shocked, scared and angry when American blacks started raising their fists to the sky and demanding equal rights as human beings.

They have spent the last fifty years laboring mightily to try and re-frame the civil rights movement as an unpopular, unwanted aberration led by a band of whiny misfits who just wanted special perks.

These people shrewdly concede that, yes, the separate bathroom and separate drinking fountain thing was bad, and they certainly do not advocate returning to THAT state of affairs. No, they certainly want black people to be as free and equal as the day is long. It's just...couldn't the blacks go be free and equal somewhere else? Why, ask these white people, must we be forced to have them in our schools and clubs and workplaces?

Special ire is reserved for blacks who seem "angry." This particular white population is forever on the lookout for "angry" black people. Naturally, therefore, they find them everywhere. They are quite sure that this "anger" would go away, and American blacks would return to their "natural" state of being...well...submissive...if we could just get rid of civil rights and affirmative action.]


I am a black separatist and a pan-africanist, so I don't blame whiteys for wanting their land to be black-free and/or mostly White. I support them.

And I never said women shouldn't have rights.


[Do you see any parallels between the attitude of white American racists towards blacks in general, and your attitude towards black women in particular?]

No. Black women adopted the "feminist" attitude and they lose their feminity. Black (or any) men don't like that.

[Wow. Just...wow. I don't even know what to say.

So I'll say this.

You may not like what black women have to say. You may not like the fact that they dare to say it. But you know what? They're speaking their truth to you.

White and Asian women are trained not to do that. I remember once when I was around 6 or 7 years old, a friend of mine called and invited me over to her house. I didn't feel like going, but I honestly didn't think I had the right to say so. I thought it would be mean, impolite, friendship-shattering. In a panic, I told her I would come, because I simply didn't know what else to do. But, I really didn't want to go. So...I didn't.

She ended up calling me two more times, asking when I was going to show up.

If I had felt free to speak the truth to her--to wound her in a smaller way--I would not have wounded her in the much bigger way I ended up doing.

BEWARE THE SILENCE AND INGRATIATING SMILES of white and Asian women. They're cultural in origin, not personal. They're about training, not temperament. Sometimes they're genuine. A lot of times, though, they're a front put on to disguise emotions that we either can't or don't know how to express.

The women who have attacked you for your attitudes--the ones you find "hateful" and even "physically repulsive"--those women are your friends. The ones who seem all sweet and submissive are not.]


I (and most men) prefer this moderate/civilized attitude than the generally loud and annoying black women. Especially if they talk to me about the "I'm strong, independant" thing, "black men sucks" etc....

I find them so ugly, and digusting, I don't even look at them, and try to avoid them most of the time. And when I told them that, they call me self-hating black, I reply you're objectively just plain ugly gtfo.

Video : a Black man speaks out ! : Black Women Are Not Submissive & Feminine Enough For BLACK MEN (Starts at 04:00)


[you claim to be a pan-africanst And yet, you hate black women. Methinks I see a problem there.]

I'm honest with myself, maybe it's because I was raised in a predominantly white country, but my sexual attraction goes toward White causasian females. But I still do think that Black/afro-descent people need their own independant country/continent and that interracial countries are a mess. Blacks are not socially welcomed in the western world.


[What you said was, "I'm in favor of equal rights BUT."

You do believe that, at a certain point, women "have to" have babies.

Which is a huge decision, and you think you have the right to make it for them--AND their husbands, too, I might add.

So, you think women should have some rights...but not equal rights, not the right to do whatever they want with their own lives and their own bodies as long as they're not harming other people.

Which makes you the male equivalent of a Jim Crow white person in pre-civil-rights America.

You wouldn't find one person down south, outside of an active Klan member, who believed blacks should not have ANY rights. Heavens, no. They'd be in favor of LOTS of rights for blacks......as long as those rights didn't go "too far." "At a certain point," like, say, being allowed to marry a white person if they choose, they have to go to the back of the bus.

American blacks rejected this wholesale, as they should.

And by the way--THAT is what created the tough, truth-to-power, outspoken black woman whom you so charmingly despise. Not feminism. American feminism tends to be embarrassingly white ]

It's not comparable. women have a natural biological role. Blacks are not "naturally" supposed to sit on the back of the bus, or be hung on a tree.

And sadly feminism is a model for most black women.

Return To Order #fundie #dunning-kruger #sexist returntoorder.org

Tell Netflix Amazon to Cancel Blasphemous 'Good Omens' Series

Due to an oversight by Return to Order staff, this petition originally listed Netflix as responsible for the offensive series "Good Omens." Amazon Video released the series on May 31. We regret the mistake, and the protests will be delivered to Amazon when the campaign is complete.

The Amazon series "Good Omens," based on a book by Terry Pratchett and Neil Gaiman, portrays the agents of Good and Evil as fighters in an arbitrary struggle devoid of meaning and truth. This series presents devils and Satanists as normal and even good, where they merely have a different way of being, and mocks God's wisdom in the following ways:

• An angel and demon are good friends, and are meant to be earth's ambassadors for Good and Evil respectively.

• This pair tries to stop the coming of the Antichrist because they are comfortable and like the earth so much.

• God is voiced by a woman.

• The Antichrist, who will oppose the Kingdom of God, is portrayed as a normal kid that has special powers and a mission to destroy the world which he doesn't really want to do.

• There are groups of Satanic "nuns" that are chosen to raise the Antichrist.

• The four riders of the Apocalypse, God's means of punishing sinful earth, are portrayed as a group of bikers.

In the end, this is a denial of Good and Evil: morality and natural law do not exist, just humanitarianism and an ultimately useless creed. This is another step to make Satanism appear normal, light and acceptable. We must show our rejection. Please sign our petition, telling Amazon that we will not stand silent as they destroy the barriers of horror we still have for evil.

NlightNme #conspiracy shroomery.org

If you'd rather have your mind blown yourself watch Paul McCartney Really is Dead - The Last Testament of George Harrison. I'm pretty sure it was on Netflix instant stream that we were watching it, but not positive. And sorry if this is old news to some of y'all. I'm 22 so I wasn't alive when this shit was going down.

Basically in 1966 Paul McCartney and John Lennon got in to an argument over lyrics and Paul stormed out of the studio. He died in a car crash via decapitation. Since they were high priority the intelligence agency had the band identify him and told them it must be kept secret because news of his death would cause hundreds of suicides (This was at the peak of their fame). So eventually what they do is have a tv show hold a McCartney look-a-like competition and the agency took one of the canidates and performed a series of surgeries to make him look exactly like Paul McCartney. They remained in the studio and obscurred their faces so that the fake Paul's scars and incompleteness would not be recognized. Some of his scars can clearly be seen in some of the pictures. That was breakthrough stuff at the time and because of the global tensions the band was sworn to secrecy under threat of death. Lennon felt terrible about it all and wanted to leave the fans clues so that when the truth was discovered they could say we were sworn to secrecy under threat of death and that they tried to tell the fans. The clues were left mainly in the form of album artwork , song lyrics, and backwards tracking messages on to albums.

Anyways the intelligence agency had been keeping an eye on them and found out about all of their clues and threatened them to stop it multiple times. Around that time some people had caught on and Rumors began to spread that McCartney was dead. The band, fearing for their lives, called the head guy at the intelligence agency who had been threatening them and told them they were going to call the whole thing a hoax and call an end to their band in 6 months. They produced one more album titled "The Beatles" and was all white. Despite the conformed album cover, they still put backwards trackings in it and one of em Lennon says "Fuck you Maxwell" - The name of the head guy in the agency. They all quickly went their seperate ways and the fake Paul began doing his own stuff because he had become accustomed to being Paul.

Lennon went to America and tried to keep a really high profile by being an activist and appearing insane on purpose so that he could discredit himself and hopefully take himself off of the radar. Paul's wife (who saw Paul die), demanded that the fake paul marry her in order for her to keep quiet. Fake Paul calls the head agency guy and a week later she is killed. Later John Lennon told the band members that he had thought enough time had passed, so he informed them that he had called the fake paul and told him of his plan to tell the world the truth. Shortly after... well... You know the rest.

Some time later some Rock n Roll magazine producers or some company or something got a package in the mail with no return adress from Britan. Inside were a tape recorder and 3 casettes. On it George Harrison tells the entire story and talks about every clue they gave out. Those people made the documentary I mentioned above. It goes through and shows all of em and there are SO many. After one documentary I saw the Beatles in a completely different light and so many of their songs/lyrics make perfect sense.

Power Point Paradise #conspiracy powerpointparadise.com

This horrendous cover-up and annihilation of tons of evidence for the existence of 8-12 or more feet giants in the world’s historical record, is nothing less than dictatorial academic censorship, far worse than what happened to Galileo! The Roman Church openly protested his views but never totally erased them from the record or silenced him, au contraire, these Smithsonian censors’ underhanded behaviour is war by deception and stealth to purposely eradicate & suppress a very important part of our human history and key evidence that giants were a normal — and rather ubiquitous — part of the human experience! This is literally “unheard of!”

Not only Genesis dryly states, “In those days there were giants in the land“, and we heard about Patagonian giants encountered by Magellan first and Captain Samuel Wallis on the HMS “Dolphin” In 1767, who actually measured them, and many others since then, but almost every ethnic group on Earth has stories, legends, and very old “fairytales” about giants.

I know, because as a youngster I loved to read them, as I found them have a ring of truth and very interesting! I already was wondering then, why so many people would even come up with stories about giants, because I never did. Well, now you know, –I hope? They saw and had to deal with them, because more often than not they were nuisances in those stories! (They would call that “racism” now! :) ha!)

[...]

Some of us know there were reports of giants in the Middle East, like Goliath and King Og of Bashan. There is actual evidence in the Bashan area of Southern Syria of ruins of immense stone houses! But it seems that North America and its Mounds Culture people are taking the cake!

Report after news report and expert opinions galore, testify one similar analysis, that these were not American Indians, who actually fought them, but they already lived there long before the Indians settled in.

The giants appear to have mined copper and to be quite advanced in culture. Why do Smithsonians and Mainstream Academia consider giants dangerous to declare or not kosher to exhibit in state museums, or teach about in historical academia and public schools? What is the politics behind it? Why are they so dead set against giants? Has it something to do with obfuscating a certain world-view, and promoting a totally different paradigm perhaps? We shall see!

One of Few Actual Giant Mummy Photos!

A female giantess it seems?–Also without any identification or detail.

image

If it hadn’t been for some private individual putting his personal photo collection on line, we would’ve never seen this photo, nor of the Giant Mummy from Antrim, Ireland, at the end of this post, — which also somehow vanished, by the way — nor of the 12 Meter Pteranodon shot down during the American Civil War in 1864! (Click link, to see the entire beast and read the horrid true story of a similar cover-up! Remember! You read about it in the ‘Paradise Post’ first!)

Hawaiian 17-25 Feet Giants?

Neither did you or I ever even hear about the discovery, let alone about the fate of the 17-25 Feet tall Hawaiian OloWalu Maui Giants! THEY were shipped off to Australia, to also never be heard of again! (Fomorian descendants from Cham perhaps?) I guess the Smithsonians have or made some deal with the official Australian State Historical Cover-Up Department! They are quite well-known as such already, covering up Phoenician or Canaanite Tin Mines in Queensland! Their official name is probably the ‘Australian Natural Museum’ or something! Were the crates ditched at sea? Or did they ditch them in a locked vault too! We’ll never know, I guess

ONLY THE LOCAL 1912 WAIMEA NEWSPAPER REPORTS ABOUT MAUI GIANTS, BUT NOT HOW THEY WERE LOST TO POSTERITY OR TO THE MAUI PEOPLE!

[...]

So WHY do they not want us to know about these giants. Here listen to what the Smithsonian anthropologist said about the owner of the biggest head he had found! “He was a man of exceptional intelligence!” More intelligent than us! When? BEFORE WRITTEN HISTORY BEGAN! Is that perhaps a clue?

The Ruling Smithsonian Paradigm!

After the first secretary of the Smithsonian Institute, Joseph Henry who was interested in Charles Darwin’s Origin of Species published in 1857, and ordered the book at once, he was followed by staunch Darwinist Spencer Fullerton Baird, who trained his successor, protege and friend George Brown Goode who led the SI until 1896. Eversince the S.I has followed a rigorous Darwinian approach until today! That verily explains things and their agenda for disappearing anti-Darwinian artifacts and archaeological items, like the giants that are rarely mentioned in the first Book ever published by the S.I, on –guess what– “American Mound Builders.” Although the newspapers of the time are full of news about them, that book does not mention giants at all! Huh?

The following is straight from the horses’ mouth — Smithsonian website!

image
image
THE DEAR BOYS PROBABLY TOOK THE FUNDS FROM THE ROCKEFELLERS OR ROTHSCHILDS, AND THREW THEIR CONSCIENCE UNDER THE BUS! – MONEY SQUAWKS! HOW MANY ARE JUST LIKE THEM TODAY?!

Washington! Australia, New Zealand, Grea Britain, Ireland, all had a tradition to obfuscate real history! I’ll tell you: The Uniformitarian Darwinian Thought Police are globally very well organised and hyper active! And they are well supported by all the glossy “Science” and “Nature” magazines on the bookstands, and of course by all the “science”, “nature”, and “history” programs on the Telly or the Tube!

They’ll all tell you a tall tale that most of you would certainly believe! Hysteria Channel, National Pornographic, and UFO TV, will tickle your ears with all juicy details, mysterious submerged civilisations, megaliths, pyramids, and date them back way too long, and blame it all on Evolution of billions of years.

Either that, or they now begin to blame it on…the ALIENS! Like they did when the Russians found a fancy metalurgic wonder in 300 million year old coal near Wladiwostok! Guess what the Voice of Russia’s headline was: “High Tech UFO Cogwheel Discovered in 300 million year old Coal Seam!” Ha! Read it for yourself! You’ll get a kick out of it.

Do you still want to study HISTORY at UNIVERSITY? You will have to leave TRUE science BEHIND!! I guess if you’re in it for money, fame, or a cushy academic position, it won’t faze you. But remember you will be responsible for what you teach these kids! And all liars will have their fate in the Lake of Fire!

Lisa, The FBI, and Smithsonian Thought Police!

Here is another report concerning resistance to publicising discoveries which happen to be at variance with accepted scientific dogma. The truth WILL eventually radiate around the world, as it deserves.

A friend of mine had a long talk with a New Zealand girl called Lisa Kerr. She’d done extensive traveling, like many young New Zealanders, who head out on their traditional OE (overseas excursion).

Lisa, amongst several jobs she got around the world, worked for a while with the New Mexico Park’s Department. During her term of employment there was a big “washout” in one of the Park regions and I’m assuming it was up in Pueblo country around Taos.

The flash Flood scoured out embankments and in doing so a large number of anomalous skeletons were exposed.

Lisa and her colleagues were assigned the task of gathering up the remains and placing them into crates.

Also in attendance at the site were Smithsonian Institute officials and FBI agents.

Each day as Lisa and the other Park’s Department employees went onto the site, they were searched for cameras. Similarly they were searched as they left the site each day to make sure they weren’t removing
artefacts.

They were also obliged to sign “secrecy documents” ensuring that they would never divulge details of their participation in this undertaking.

The reason for this degree of secrecy stems from the fact that the skeletons were of people who were about 8 feet tall. They had six fingers on each hand and six toes per foot. They also had a strange, double row arrangement of teeth.

The crates containing the recovered remains, at the termination of work, were taken away by the Smithsonian officials and, undoubtedly, will never be seen again.

Strangely enough, there is a report of two similar skulls having been found in New Zealand’s far north around the beginning of the 20th century.

Lisa later had official “hassles” when trying to come home to New Zealand and was severely grilled by US government functionaries as she attempted to depart from the U.S.

If you are a lover of the TRUTH, then you will be excited that the truth is now ready to come out.

Roosh V #sexist rooshv.com

How To Stop Incels From Killing People

The busy bees at the media have been highlighting how “dangerous” incels are, often linking them to the manosphere [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. These journalists fail to mention that incels have either outright rejected manosphere ideas, especially when concerning game, or have been inoculated against its teachings by their own media colleagues.

Incels are killing solely because they are failing to bond romantically or sexually with women in an intensely competitive sexual market that constantly rubs sex and nudity in their faces. The solution is rather simple: give them free sex from whores.

What is an incel?
image
It’s first helpful to determine the basic profile of an incel. Typically, he does not have a hands-on masculine father teaching him the ways of life and women. He was teased in school, though not aggressively bullied, and has few friends. He is not good in sports or any other activity that would help give him a sexy aesthetic. He has no skills beyond programming or playing video games. His educational upbringing taught him that any display of masculine behavior is harmful to females, which he has internalized to his own detriment. More severely, he is introverted and has practically no ability to talk to females or attract them.

A decade ago, this type of “herbivore” male become a cultural phenomenon in Japan. In America, it’s now becoming the default man. Within a few years, more than 50% of all men will be on the incel spectrum.

An incel primarily wants a loving relationship with an attractive woman. Secondly, he wants sex with any woman. A male who gets laid but doesn’t experience love may be depressed or unhappy, but he’s unlikely to possess the urge to kill. The ones who do end up killing have received neither relationships nor sex. They feel utterly forsaken by society. To remind society that they do in fact exist, they resort to getting attention in the only way they know how: killing. Shooting up people is the same for an incel as a female uploading a perfect selfie. It’s a way of saying please recognize my existence and validate me for it.

Incels must be provided free prostitutes

I therefore advocate for a government program called Complimentary Heterosexual Affections Directive (CHAD). Incels will be given a mobile QR code for a complimentary legalized sex session every six months, a time interval that would outright eliminate their urge to kill. The whores that are a part of this program would be given special training to make the incels feel special by calling them “handsome,” “powerful,” and “confident,” compliments they have never heard in their lives. The whores would rock their worlds to such an extent that the incels will patiently wait to live in freedom another six months to fornicate again.

The details of the CHAD program would be simple. First, the government would provide an online questionnaire that incels take to qualify for the program. It would not be too strict: if a man hasn’t been laid in at least six months and wants a free whore, it’s better for society to provide it for him to dampen his rising urge to be noticed through a mass shooting.

Whores would apply to the program and work from home or in a designated government brothel that is placed in high population areas. After a sexual experience, the incel would give his government whore a rating on a 1-5 star system. Whores who ever dip under 3 stars would be eliminated from the program, ensuring that the government only hires the best whores for the incels since this is literally a life or death matter.

Single women will pay for the incel’s whores
image
She’s funding the free whores program

Structuring CHAD as a government program will allow women to have “skin in the game”—they’ll be reminded that their choices in sex partners have both financial and mortal consequences. The program will be entirely funded through taxes on the products that enable women to have casual sex with attractive men—birth control, dating apps, and smartphones.

After CHAD is implemented, anyone who wants to buy an iPhone will have to provide government identification that reveals their sex. If the buyer is female and unmarried, an automatic 100% tax will be added. Women will also be taxed $5 for every Tinder match they receive, and each birth control pill purchased by an unmarried woman will come with an extra $1 tax that goes directly to fund CHAD.

Whenever a girl uses her phone to get attention from attractive men, scores a new Tinder match with a hot guy, or pops a birth control pill that let’s her have sex without wanting to reproduce, her mind will flash with the realization that her easy-earned money is going towards incels she refuses to bang. If women are choosing nice guy incels for sex, those incels will not need to use the whore program and thus the tax will be reduced. It’s fine if women want to forsake the bottom 50% of the male population for sexual relationships, but they will have to pay for it so those men don’t kill other citizens. We have to stop the high standards of modern women from causing additional deaths.

An easier and cheaper solution than the CHAD program is to teach men game, particularly the Roosh Program. It instructs an incel to hit the gym, read some books, build up social experience, stop being a wimp, and finally embrace the masculinity that has been smothered for so long. Game may be getting harder in the West, but there are still worthwhile options in South America, Eastern Europe, and Southeast Asia.

Game saves lives
image
This man will not kill anyone

The fact that Jewish organizations, feminist authors, and the media continue to attack me means that they don’t really care that people are getting shot up. Give me an incel on the verge of killing and I’ll hand you back a sexually sated Stan who lives in Thailand for three months of the year, or a beefed-up Oscar who found a dive bar where he can bang porkers on the weekends with barely any effort. Maybe these situation aren’t exactly ideal for Stan or Oscar, but it’s better than rotting in jail or being killed by the police in an exciting shootout that gets millions of views on YouTube.

Of course our cultural elites with not help implement the CHAD or Roosh program. As much as they whine about how older women can’t find any “good men,” and how hard it is for mentally ill trannys to get laid with in a climate of “transphobic” discrimination, they much prefer for incels to fuck off and die. A Silicon Valley executive named Ellen Pao even suggested they never be hired in the first place, which could lead to their starvation. We’re only a year or two off from op-eds in the New York Times suggesting Incel Concentration Camps. Are you a man who women don’t want to sleep with? Off to the gulags! You won’t even be allowed to masturbate.

The reaction of the elites clearly shows that there will be many more incel shooting sprees in the future. They will desperately try to link these killings to pro-masculine dissidents such as myself, but we know that if a man is allowed to find my work and implement it, he would never want to kill in the first place. Let us all hear the incel rallying cry: Give me love, give me whores, or give me game! Otherwise, he just may go crazy.

Various Incels #sexist incels.co

(Comments on "Help me with my list of female interests that I'm trying to record down", Part 2. OP here, Part 1 here)

(SchrödingersDick)
Bro.... I don’t see the obvious ones.

Thinking about chad
Chasing chad
Wearing form-altering clothes for chad
Advertising fertility to chad
Wearing face paint because chad likes high estrogen faces
Sucking chads dick
Drinking chads cum
Painting face with chads cum
Getting fucked by chad
Gettigng fucked by another chad
Getting analed by chad
Gettgin DPed by chad and gigachad
Getting choked by chad
Getting slapped by chad
Getting spit on by chad
Crying over chad
Rejecting looksmatch b/c chad exists
Posting softcore porn on instagram
Feeding off the comments and likes of said softcore porn
Making bald manlets want to fuck you but denying them pussy
Feeling good that guys want to put their dicks In you
@Eugenicist


They take high pride in their insulation. They think anyone who is a hard worker is worthless from the angles they're evaluating from. Where someone who has to work shows low pedigree. Women want genopedigree and filiopedigree and existentiopedigree.
Affiliation, genetics, and existence.
Asians and light skin fascination is proof enough of this.

(micropenis29)
Shopping--in particular shopping for clothes with their betabux's money--is what interests foids the most by far.

(MayorOfKekville)
Complete list of foid “interests”:

1. Chad

(GameDevCel)
50 shades of grey, twillight, titanic

(Eugenicist)
@GameDevCel

50 shades of grey, twillight, titanic

in terms of fantasy/ movies perhaps.
Harry Potter is one of hte mbecause of hte lightful wonky univeres it has in it.

(MSCW)
Everything related to consumerism.
The rest is a giant cope. They're virtue signalling.

(Italcel)

Staying fit

i hope u are being sarcastic, i see only fat/chubby whores outside

(happiless)
Yes you missed

* Sucking Chad's dick
* Vaginal sex with Chad
* Being fucked in the ass by Chad

(MSCW)
@Erenor


reading
dancing
art
feminism
meeting friends with the sole purpuse to talk
textile work
cooking
(not a stereotype or cope, there are actually females who enjoy traditional female hobbies like cooking or sewing)

reading > virtue signalling. They would rather binge netflix
dancing > how to meet attractive males
feminism > goal
meeting friends with the sole purpuse to talk > how was the last guy you fucked, what's his number girl, don't be a bitch share him with us.
textile work > how to value yourself and want to looks better than your female friends
cooking > they can't. instead a beta would invite to diner.

(Sanpakucel)
dogpill ngltbhngl (assuming that isn't what you meant by animals)

some incels #sexist reddit.com

(LongSpeed)
whelp I finally give up guys, feels pretty good.

Last time I saw my cousin was probably about 10 years ago, she was a getting quite fat, she had always had a ugly face and if I recall a dull personality. Haven't been to my parents house in awhile and I was looking around the kitchen and saw a card on the fridge. There she was, 350 pounds at least, likely 5'4ish, the kind of fat that looks like a comical fat suit, ugly as shit. It was a wedding invitation, guy was a solid chad lite-lite. I've only seen the memes, it's never hit so close to home before. I ordered a pizza. the first of many. Canceled my gym membership, threw out my acne medication, and ordered a 10$ fleshlight. LDAR time now, I finally feel happy.

(ItsOver4Maymaycels)
https://incels.wiki/w/images/3/3f/Juggernautt.png

Juggernaut Law my nibba, there are NO women with low SMV, no exceptions, unhyperbolically not a SINGLE woman in this entire planet has lower SMV than an average man, you think there's any way to refute that a 0/10 landwhale photoshopped to have a pig nose gets lots of attention from decent looking dudes? Do you realize now the sheer amount and quality of men you are competing with for even the WORST women out there? That is why it's over.

(looksmaxxedcurrycel)
Yup, theres also the fact that a lot of dudes are tired of trying to come up with witty texts/jokes. A 7/10 dude prolly sees a sub-3 girl as an easy lay. Problem is, so do the rest of the dudes who are 7 and below. And now you have all these dudes messaging her, her ego goes through the roof, her new standard is 7 and above and the wheels of hypergamy are set forth in motion.

(AnyGoal)
it's worse than that bro. all facets of the relationship favour the woman. so if you're comparing it to you being 350 pounds and dating a cute girl, you're wrong. the comparison is that plus having that girl bend over backwards to do everything for you, serve you, make sure you're taken care of, little surprises and catering to your moods, planning trips for you, working hard and making all the money to support you, watching all your shows with you, etc. etc. AND you still have the option of sleeping with even hotter girls than her in secret whenever you want.. those hot girls are constantly trying to win a night with you.

basically she is living the life of kublai khan.

Miguel #fundie theantifeminist.com

Ephebophilia (or ‘hebephilia’) is a word commonly bandied about online by individuals wishing to differentiate between men (like themselves), who are attracted towards underage teenagers, and ‘paedophiles’ who are sexually attracted to pre-pubescent children. Of course, the media, and the legal system, makes no such distinction. However, many who would champion the right of men to have sexual relations with girls currently under the age of consent feel strongly that if this distinction was more widely known and accepted then it could facilitate a more reasonable public discussion on the age of consent and the laws and punishments relating to sex with teens. Paedophiles are evil perverts and beyond the pale, but ephebophiles? Well, they are not so very different from the average red-blooded man – they just like their women a little bit younger. Yes, they are suffering from a clinical disorder, as paedophiles are, but it’s not so harmful and they are a lot closer to the normal spectrum than subhuman paedos.

So is ephebophilia a real thing? Does the concept serve any useful purpose in the context of the feminist war upon male sexuality and age of consent issues in particular? And am I just as much as a hebo as some of my former readers who have championed the label in the past, such as ‘Human Stupidity‘?

As regulars will know, I’ve made a point of strongly disavowing the very idea of ephebophilia. There are two good reasons for this.

Firstly, my experience of ‘ephebophiles’ both here and elsewhere online. Self-identified ephebophiles tend to be universally 1/ clearly autistic 2/ tactically clueless 3/ prone to paedocrisy and even 4/ Left-Wing and pro-feminist (obviously some exceptions, such as HS) and certainly ‘anti-misogynistic’.

To put it bluntly, based upon my experience, such people are worse than useless in the fight against the Sexual Trade Union. I’d rather go into battle against an Isis horde with only a dozen disabled, pacifist, transgenders alongside me than these creepy ‘ephebophiles’. Hell, I’d rather take on a handful of Russian Ultras with a thousand English football hooligans to back me up. That’s how pathetic these aspie hebos are when it comes to the street fight we are all in.

Secondly, I see no strategic advantage whatsoever in embracing the label of ephebophilia. ‘Hebos’ are so clueless that they really do believe, in their aspie naivety, that the same hysteric mobs who burn down the homes of pediatricians will take kindly to a group defining themselves by a slightly different Ancient Greek term meaning ‘ perverted love of underage girls with hair and perky breasts’.

Of course, this isn’t quite fair. Ephebophilia means ‘love of youth’ (form the Greek word for youth – ‘hebe’). And the attraction to young post-pubescent girls is indeed normal. The point is, to paedohysterics, a word doesn’t change a thing. David Futrelle, child snuff porn apologist and paedocrite that he is, is right to mock the idea that it could ‘win over’ feminists or the paedo hating population at large. In fact, it could make things very much worse. I have spoken here before of the fact that shows like ‘To Catch a Predator’, and ‘anti-paedophile’ vigilantes such as Stinson Hunter, nearly always target men who are trying to have sex with girls only a little under the age of consent. They never try to entrap real perverts and child molestors.

The reason why we have this insane moral panic over ‘paedophiles’ is not because perverts who molest 5 year old children are hated. It’s because society hates and fears even more the normal men who break age of consent laws by having sex with nubile young teens. Paedocritical men are shouting at the bulge in their pants at the thought of climbing into bed with a sexy 14 year old, and all the legal consequences that would follow for them, and paedohysteric woman (and feminists) are shouting at the millions of men who would not even hide the bulge in their pants and openly pursue teenage girls if it wasn’t for the law, the shaming, and the feminist induced hysteria over ‘paedophilia’.

It is true to an extent that establishing the concept of ephebophilia in mainstream discourse would help to clarify what real paedophilia is and isn’t. Real paedophilia is a psychological perversion involving the sexual preference for pre-pubescent children (in today’s USA, that means girls under the age of 10 or so). But at the same time, I see absolutely no advantage in replacing one clinically defined pathology with another. Anti-feminism is the fight against the feminist suppression and pathologizing of normal male heterosexuality. It is normal for men to be sexually attracted to females who have started puberty and who have the maximum number of fertile years ahead of them.

Ephebophile activists believe they can identify themselves as a group and fight for and eventually win their sexual rights, just as gays (supposedly) did. No they can’t. However, MEN can perhaps reclaim their sexual rights against feminists. Only normal, heterosexual MEN can win in the fight against the war on male sexuality.

With all this said, however, I wouldn’t be honest not to add my own personal experiences over the last couple of years, and describe how they have perhaps enabled me to look at the ‘ephebophile question’ in a new and more nuanced light. For some time I’d largely given up on dating. I was getting older, I was still introverted and awkward around the opposite sex, and in any case, as ‘the Anti-Feminist’ I saw all women as rapists, every one of them limiting male sexuality in order to futher their own selfish sexual ends. Walking down the street and smiling at a pretty jailbait as an act of defiance was the limit of female involvement in my world.

For over two years now I’ve been spending the majority of my time in Eastern Europe. As most readers accept here, Slavic women are much more feminine and better looking than their Anglo counterparts, with Russians at the very apex of the female beauty pyramid. Furthermore, they age rather differently too. Yes, of course any normal man would be attracted to even an average Russian 15 year old girl, but the ‘Manosphere Myth’ that I’ve criticised here in the past regarding peak fertility and women reaching their maximum attractiveness at 21-25 isn’t so implausible when you constantly see such stunningly beautiful long legged slim women in their early twenties all around you.

In Eastern Europe I don’t get the achingly painful sense of regret at seeing a pretty 14 year old girl and thinking that by the time she is legal, she will already be losing her youthful charm and beauty. The fact is, in the UK, and even in countries such as France and Germany, the majority of girls are burnt out, bitter, overweight slags by the time they reach 18. Because of diet, lifestyle, and genetics, even pretty 14 year olds do start to lose it by the time they are off to university. In Eastern Europe, puberty arrives a little later, lasts longer, and everywhere you turn there are 20 year old women who are ravishingly beautiful, have perfect skin, possess the long slim legs of ballerinas, and who wear elegant fashions with a graceful air.

Furthermore, I’ve fallen in love with at least a couple of such specimans. One of them is now 26. I have seen photos of her when she was a teenager and the curious thing is she didn’t look anything special even at 17. By 21 she was modelling, and even now as she approaches her 30’s, I get jealous looks constantly when I am with her, even in a city where HB8s are the norm. Even the likes of Krauser PUA would give me a nod of respect if he saw me with her. Look closely and she has crow feet developing around her eyes. Her skin is no longer perfect. But if I could re-wind time I would not wish her any younger than 21. And it’s not down to make-up either. I have seen her without, and she is still beautiful, and more beautiful than she was when she was a schoolgirl.

Another of my girlfriends is 20, and very pretty. She still looks like a teen, and even behaves like one in many ways, though thankfully more in a cute than insufferable manner. Although beautiful, I do not recieve so many jealous looks when I am with her as when I am with the woman who is a good deal older. This girl, I only met recently. I have seen photos of her when she was 18, and she looked almost perfect. I would have liked to have known her then, and I would still not object to a girlfriend such as her who is 16 or 17. However, in Eastern Europe the age of consent is not such a weighty issue given the mass of beautiful females aged above even 18. And this is probably why paedohysteria is primarily an Anglo-Saxon phenomenon.

So in the light of my experiences, how would I finally appraise ‘ephebophila’? As to whether it is a real thing, I am both more and less inclined to say yes. Despite my disavowal of the term here in the past, I somewhat suspected that I might be ‘a little different’ to the average man. Not just in being honest about attraction to young teenagers, but perhaps more strongly attracted than most. Although partly right, I think I had simply fallen into the same mistake that I’d rightly accused self-identified ‘ephebophiles‘ of making. The honesty to accept that teens are attractive can lead you to identify yourself, even subconsciously, as ‘somebody who is attracted to teenage girls’ and different to other men, and to somewhat ignore the charms of slightly older females. And this is compounded by the disgraceful state of femininity in the Anglo-Saxon world, a world in which the only feminine and loveable girls left are indeed mostly under 18.

If ephebophilia exists, therefore, it is not a clinical disorder, such as real paedophilia is, but rather a situation in a man’s life brought about by feminism and the state of women in the Western world.

And as a badge, it’s still tactically clueless and aspie.

My experiences of falling in love have also altered somewhat my views on ‘normal male sexuality’ in the sense that I now give more value to the merits of sex within a loving relationship. Of course, I am not now claiming that the female monogamous system is ‘right’ for men. I am currently in love with two beautiful women, and I think I have emotional room left for a couple more as well, hehe. All I’m saying is I no longer mock the notion of love, and that sex with love is, after all, something that every man should be able to experience as part of a happy life. I also look at porn less, and so I have to admit, I am closer to Eivind Berge’s view that real relationships are better than fapping. However, I still feel that he doesn’t understand the dangers of giving the slightest credence to feminist arguments against porn. And also, not many men can have girlfriends as good looking as his, and not many men approaching 50, as I am, can walk down the street with a beautiful 20 year old, or a HB9 26 year old, as I can. Porn never stopped me having relationships. Rather, it was a life-saving substitute in fallow times. It also helped to keep the flame of desire alive as I sank into middle-age.

And that thought leads nicely onto a final word regarding my contribution to men’s rights activism and the lack of updates on this blog. Yes, I am in some ways happier and more content than before, and therefore no longer feel the need or have the desire to carry the stress and time commitment of regularly posting articles here. It’s also true that I certainly no longer feel any personal pain at current age of consent laws. I would certainly be satisfied forever more at having relationships with beautiful Slavic girls aged 16 above, or even 18 above. But this certainly isn’t the reason for my lack of involvement in men’s rights. I still maintain that the ‘age of consent’, or more correctly, all the many issues that revolve around it, as part of the wider assault upon male sexuality by feminists, is the leading men’s rights issue. But perhaps I am less inclined to maintain this site, just when I am finding some happiness and sexual satisfaction, to cater to disloyal self-identified ephebophile readers such as the likes of Jon or Human-Stupidity, themselves prone to paedocrisy whenever it suits them.

Eric Saferstein #conspiracy agsaf.org

On so-called "artificially generated stampedes")
Awareness

Important definitions:

artificially generated stampede – A sudden rush of people likely the result of panic-inducing information delivered via cell phones or mobile devices

viral blitzkrieg – A bombardment of information designed to saturate a specific location(s) and exponentially spread panic

dominipede – Multiple, simultaneous human stampedes likely the result of a viral blitzkrieg

Emergency evacuation protocol overview

A basic explanation of emergency evacuation protocol is necessary for understanding the principles associated with the artificially generated stampede. Historically, human stampedes have occurred in a variety of settings. However, the artificially generated stampede is best explained through the context of sporting events in large stadiums.

Every so often, when deemed absolutely necessary, a major football stadium undergoes an emergency evacuation. This is customarily due to situations involving inclement weather, such as lightning strikes. There’s a very specific protocol for executing large crowd evacuations.

First, an announcement is delivered over the public address system requesting fan attention and cooperation. Its purpose is to notify everyone that the event has been temporarily suspended. It is generally considered unwise to offer a definitive reason for a full scale evacuation. Expert consensus indicates that the lesser the justification, the smoother the evacuation process. A second announcement is then issued to clear the field of all players, officials and personnel. That message is repeated until the initial phase is complete. Then, a third announcement is delivered to evacuate the crowd. That message is repeated until the fans have satisfactorily exited the premises. Obviously these things take time. 20-25 minutes to safely evacuate an NFL or NCAA Division I stadium is by any means a conservative estimate.

What is the difference between a bomb threat emergency and a bomb threat condition? That’s a very important question. It should not come as a shock to know that just because someone phones in a bomb threat or scrawls the word “bomb” on a restroom mirror… that, in itself, is rarely sufficient cause to stage a complete evacuation. These kinds of incidents, or bomb threat conditions, happen far more often than the public is aware. There’s an obvious reason you wouldn’t launch an evacuation each time something like this happens. Precedent. Such action would constitute a horrible precedent and could encourage copycats. Bomb threat emergency classification invokes a reasonably higher threshold of evidence.

The final decision to order an evacuation rests with the incident commander, stadium manager or whoever is ultimately in charge. Any individual in this position of authority will readily concede the following: that under no circumstance would you evacuate a stadium by transmitting a mass text message. The reason being that it would irreparably alter the nature of the evacuation. Even if the message was carefully written, it could potentially spark a mass panic. The delivery method in which information is disseminated is often just as important as the message’s content. This is why it’s customary to utilize the public address system, perhaps in concert with the jumbotron. To present a coherent, scripted message that is far less likely open to individual misinterpretation. A clear, unified set of instructions is critical in maintaining an orderly evacuation process.

Current emergency evacuation protocol has been rendered obsolete by the ubiquitous presence of cell phones. The notion that only the incident commander has absolute control over all message content and distribution platforms under his/her jurisdiction is inconsistent with the current state of technology and real-world conditions. Current evacuation protocol fails to address this profoundly changed dynamic.

How an artificially generated stampede could occur

Transmission of information through accidental or intentional misuse of emergency messaging systems (Amber Alerts, National Weather Service warnings, campus text alerts, etc.), opt-in notification abuse, reverse 911 sabotage, social media platforms (facebook, twitter, etc.) and real-time internet hoaxes, deliberate manipulation of the media (television, radio and print), spoofed emails, bulk text messaging, targeted spam, robocalls, direct phone calls, mass tri-lateration in tandem with a Stingray device, etc.

The potential for hacking and deliberate misuse of ANY of the aforementioned cellular platforms.

A viral blitzkrieg

Why an artificially generated stampede could happen

Unfamiliarity with the concept

Because emergency evacuations involve sensitive, often taboo subject matter, there is a strong reluctance to engage in a meaningful dialogue. Unfortunately, when faced with the prospect of artificially generated stampedes, OODA loops
are basically rendered nonexistent. Therefore, trying to solve the problem through mitigation is not an effective strategy. The problem must ultimately be addressed through acknowledgment and awareness. Most stadium attendees just simply aren’t aware of the fact that a legitimate evacuation order would NEVER originate from their cell phone or mobile device. Until this topic is available for public consumption, the general public will remain dangerously ignorant.

It’s just another trigger

Panic associated with human stampedes can stem from a variety of contributing factors (tear gas, physical cordons and barricades, loud sirens, rowdy fan behavior, intoxicating substances, etc.). Think of a cell phone as a weapon. A gun. Think of a message as a bullet. Now picture tens of thousands of cell phones and tens of thousands of messages. AGSAF is not preoccupied with the notion of a single, conventional bomb threat delivered unilaterally. AGSAF is concerned about the prospect of an infinite number of simultaneous threats. Information is merely another trigger. Nothing more, nothing less.

Herding instincts

Human herding instincts are consistent in the majority of life forms. They are recognizable and well-documented in the evolutionary process. When faced with an external threat, this includes a desire to congregate toward the center mass in an attempt to reduce predation risks. A person’s ability to make rational decisions can be instantly compromised and overridden by these powerful, deeply ingrained herding instincts.

The panicked behavior of just a few individuals in a large, confined setting can have severe ramifications. When others witness fearful expressions accompanied by random individuals yelling or screaming, then pushing, shoving, running or falling (particularly down a steep flight of steps), conventional reactions are cast aside. It’s easy to dismiss your involvement in a stampede… until it happens. Human stampedes can develop suddenly, consistent with “fight-or-flight” response mechanisms.

The origins of a stampede could start with people “hedging their bets” and deciding to gravitate toward a concourse or exit. It’s not necessary to convince everyone that their lives are in jeopardy. All that’s required is convincing some people their interests would be better served if they hurriedly moved to a different location.

Historical progression of recent events

As evidenced by 9/11, acts of asymmetric terrorism appear trending toward high impact economic and militaristic systemic disruptions. Such occurrences often manifest themselves as spectacular events that visually resonate and feature unprecedented transaction costs.

Ineffectiveness of government

The U.S. government appears disinclined and/or incapable of addressing the fundamental notion of an artificially generated stampede. If raised, such concerns are likely suppressed within the bureaucracy due to the “if you acknowledge a problem, you own it. If you brief a lead official, they become accountable. And if it happens on their watch, their administration is to blame” mentality. This catch-22 is a recurring theme. How can an existing problem be solved if it cannot be adequately addressed? Government is rarely proactive when trying to tackle hypothetical, transformative issues. It is almost always reactionary, especially when dealing with human welfare in the realm of public safety.

The cell phone culture

Society is trending toward an accelerated level of electronic reliance. This is demonstrated through a greater degree of interconnectedness with a strong dependence on cellular technology and the expedited transmission of information. There also exists an ineffable, inherent level of trust placed in electronic short message services since most important communications tend to be concise, straightforward and factual. We’ve witnessed both the general public and the private sector (particularly the media), become increasingly susceptible to hacking, disinformation and a wide variety of hoaxes.

Why is the artificially generated stampede a moral issue?

Any attempt to initiate an artificially generated stampede would likely entail a strong degree of malicious intent. While a singular crisis is bad enough, it’s likely a perpetrator would seek to impact multiple locations in hopes of achieving a real-time cascade, or domino effect.

And while we would agree that it’s difficult to reprogram human behavior and institute awareness campaigns based on hypothetical scenarios, it is the prospect of a dominipede that necessitates an immediate change in the status quo. This issue extends well beyond safety. It is a moral one.

Roosh #fundie rooshv.com

There are many countries in Eastern Europe that have superior women than in America, but when you start to examine these women as wives and not only casual sex partners, you encounter a big problem: they value their education and careers above that of family. The reason? Education is offered for free or at a greatly subsidized rate by the government. Western governments are therefore programming women into becoming sterile office slaves and consumers instead of good wives and mothers.

I’ve met hundreds of Eastern European women from several countries, and because I’ve focused on living in cities, I’ve been unable to find more than a handful under the age of 25 who has shown eagerness into soon becoming a mom. Instead, the girls I’ve known have made their future employment the most important goal of their lives. Here is a conversation I’ve had several times:

Me: “Why don’t you want to be a mom soon?”

Girl: “Because I have to focus on my career first.”

Me: “Why don’t you just find a good man instead? He will take care of you.”

Girl: “Because men are bad. They cheat and become alcoholics. *Insert horror story of an awful man who a friend of a friend got married to.*”

Me: “So your job is more important than your family?”

Girl: “I need a backup plan in case my husband becomes bad.”

Men are bad, and because of that, she must spend years in university where she gets to experiment with different cocks and where she is firmly taken out of her natural role to learn how to serve a corporate master while her future kid goes to day care and her husband eats cans of tuna because his wife is too tired from work to cook, assuming she even knows how. A man’s marriage with such an empowered woman is doomed before he knows it.

Women want to have their cake and eat it too. They want to be able to marry the man they are most attracted to, and if that doesn’t work, still be able to enjoy an independent and comfortable life of Ikea furniture and Starbucks without having to put up with a man’s reasonable demands to cook him dinner and make sure the children are taken care of.

To accomplish that task, she must spend thousands of hours studying a topic like law or international business relations and became an obedient office worker instead of learning how to obey her husband. And because of this desire, which is being fully supported by the government with free or subsidized education, usually in the form of interest-free loans, we are seeing the disappearance of the nuclear family along with high divorce rates and out-of-wedlock births where future degenerates of the state get to watch mommy get sexy matches on Tinder.

...

Women win through this scheme because they are able to say no to their husbands without repercussions and the government wins because women are less dependent on men for their needs. These women then become dependent on the state and corporations, which can easily lead them to behaviors of their choice, such as not reproducing.

If you take the depopulation agenda to be accurate then it makes sense that you would want to train women to do anything but bond with men in a way that leads to reproduction. That is exactly what most Western governments have done, and it starts by essentially brainwashing women of the need to be free from their husbands by making them obsessed to earn money produced by central banks. Any country where the idea of female employment is seen as “common sense” is in the process of having their culture destroyed, if it hasn’t already been done.

But do women really get a good deal out of this? In order to survive, they must obtain resources from corporate employment, the government, or an individual man. They cannot exist in the world on their own.

The less a woman has to depend on a man’s resources, the less she will have trained herself on how to be a good wife and mother. She may still end up being a good wife and mother, but she been put on a path since her teenage years by the system to spend considerable amounts of time in corporate and victimhood training, not wife training. Therefore if you end up marrying a woman who places high value in her “empowered” job, and she refuses to quit that job when her presence is needed in the home, your misfortune comes not just from your mistake in choosing her, but in the fact that the government, through their education programs and directives, have ensured that very outcome. In effect, you’re being actively cucked by your own government.

...

Even in Eastern Europe, it is very difficult to find a woman under the age of 25 in a big city who wants to soon be a stay-at-home mom, or at least a mom who places secondary importance in her career. The feminist ideas that have infected America first came to Eastern Europe in the form of Soviet communism, which—surprise—had the primary goal to destroy the family unit.

The fact that an Eastern European girl lives in the city while her parents remain in the village means that she has been seduced by the prospect of free education, city lights, and the ability to sleep around without consequences. It is unlikely that she will be able to provide you with the home life that you deserve above that of an American woman, especially since they both approach career and motherhood in a nearly identical way. Unless you start visiting villages or churches, you’ll end up disappointed.

...

If you look at a map of fertility rates around the world, you can clearly see that countries with fertility under the replacement rate have fanatical programs about educating women. Doing so makes a woman’s most fertile period of her life go to waste so that she can spend 5-10 years getting an education in obedience, consumerism, and selfie-taking while developing a bullshit career that will not make her happier than having a family.

If I were king of a land and wanted to destroy a neighboring kingdom, I’d simply implant the idea of female education within their culture so that they’d simply die out within a few generations. In the meanwhile, have fun trying to find a good woman who believes in the most basic of family values. The government already got to her, and put ideas in her head which will make it very hard for you to experience the simple act of having a family. Sadly, besides finding a magical unicorn, I see no way for us to fix this problem for our generation.

BlkPillPres #dunning-kruger #sexist incels.co

[Blackpill] Response To: "You're Not Entitled To Sex"

1. Nobody is entitled to anything

Entitlements are a figment of imagination, they exist only in the minds of humans, and function only within societies where they are allowed to function, and are facilitated (usually through tax collection to fund said "entitlement programmes")

Pension, welfare, clean water, education, nobody is really entitled to any of it if were being objective and honest.

2. Incels don't feel entitled to sex, they simply WANT sex

I keep seeing the "entitlement" argument repeated everywhere and it is literally just a strawman argument, propping up a stance so absurd that you can't help but be right being against it, heck even I agree with being against it, because its egotistical and illogical for anyone to think they literally DESERVE anything, a normies reasoning for being against it would likely be more emotionally based though, more like - "women are people too, this is so misogynistic, its so hurtful, etc, etc".

Are there a few incels actually going around saying and believing that they "deserve" sex and are entitled to it, yes, but those men are idiots, they are outliers, any logical person knows full well nobody "deserves" anything. Most incels adhere to the "black pill philosophy", and a key "tenant" of that is basing ones life choices and interpretation of observations, on cold hard logic, so I doubt most incels (or even 5% of incels) actually believe they DESERVE sex

Incels simply just want, just like every other human on this planet that wants, to try and paint incels as this collective of egotistical males, that all think they are entitled to sex (women's bodies) is a falsehood that is often peddled by the media and society at large.

You see because its much easier to simply create a false narrative that can be argued against, than to argue against the actual thing. Paint incels as malicious and egotistical instead of frustrated and suicidal, and its much easier to demonize incels and garner support against them.

3. Disenfranchised Males = Self Destructive Males

There's this african proverb that I think perfectly describes whats taking place between modern society and average/below average males.

"If the young are not initiated in the tribe, they will burn down the village just to feel its warmth."

Modern society is extremely sexualized, there is no escape from sex as a man in these times, which is why it feels like you're being trolled whenever people say the all too cliche phrase "sex isn't the most important thing in life", nice strawman argument, now simply wanting sex because its being shoved down your throat at every waking moment, is equal to thinking its the most important thing in the world. Statements like that are nothing but dismissive shaming and silencing tactics.

Sex is in the news papers, magazines, tv, movies, video games, its in advertisements, bill boards, the internet, etc. People need to try and understand how "dystopian" of a reality this would all seem to a man who is unable to acquire sex due to unrealistic and unfair female standards that only exist due to various societal changes that resulted from feminism. Its like a sick joke were forced to live through. Everyone is telling us to just "get over it" while ironically enjoying sex lives themselves and boasting/talking about it at every waking moment.

Imagine if you woke up and basically everyone on the planet had an expensive sports car, all you see are people around you driving it, everyone with a sports car gets treated differently than those who don't, they have higher social status, etc. For some reason you can't get one no matter how much you adhere to the advice suggested by sports car owners. Everytime you complain about the biased system that keeps you from getting one, someone tells you - "there are more important things in life than sports cars", they then later proceed to talk with their friends about all the awesome sports cars they drove, post about the current sports car they have leased, and make instagram and other media posts about how great their sports car driving life is and how great they are at driving sports cars.

Quite obviously these people are being disingenuous, they know your complaints are legitimate, they don't actually follow their own words and they glorify sports cars and ownership of it ad nauseum, really they just want people without sports cars to STFU and deal with it, live without having a sports car and stop ruining the experience for the rest of them. Its really fucked up but that is societys mindset towards men who can't get sex, they know that argument is BS, they know they are lying and sex is of the utmost importance to every human (its not the most important thing, but its really really up there on the list, some might argue 2nd or 3rd place). They only repeat this BS because its really just about shaming and silencing men for daring to make society even feel a tad bit guilty or responsible for our current state of being disenfranchised. They really just expect incels to "STFU and take one for the team".

Sex is clearly a vital part of every humans existence, a man doesn't even "become a man" in a sense within society until he has sex, in essence a lot of men have not undergone their "right of passage" to become part of the "tribe" that is modern human civilization.

This is why all of these mass shootings are taking place, its started to branch off into other things like the "Thot Audit", more and more things like this are going to keep happening until society finally acknowledges this problem and begins to make changes.

So as it stands we now have a significant and growing pool of sexually starved men, who due to this are angry, violent, irritable and suicidal, seriously how does society expect this to play out, the most dangerous animal is the one backed into a corner with nothing to lose, when someone doesn't care if they die, worse yet they want to die just so their sad existence can end, there is no reasoning with that person, they are on a "war path", you either kill them, give that person what they want, or you get out of their way as they proceed to claim what they want.

Society expects us not to burn the village down when it won't initiate us into the tribe, that's whats truly outrageous, not the violence of disenfranchised men, but the fact that society actually expects us to just remain docile and accept this reality that has been forced upon us.

4. Women aren't entitled to safety

People don't seem to understand the danger of looking the collective male populace in they eyes, and telling them they aren't entitled to something that not too long ago they would just taking by force as a norm.

Men reformed themselves and created societies with laws and codes of conduct because it benefited the collective, especially the collective male populace, this was the function of "patriarchal societies". To manage a safe and fair distribution of resources, and that includes sexual and reproductive resources.

Virginity was a prerequisite for a woman to be "marriage material" because men wanted to be sure that when they married a woman she would be less likely to cheat, as she'd be more likely to be satisfied sexually with her partner due to lack of "sexual experience". It also ensured that your investment would be worth it as you aren't footing the bill for "used goods", that may sound cruel but men have to basically invest a lot into a woman's very being, even more so today, get divorced once and half of your wealth goes to another person, and these days the women aren't even virgins, marriage is truly a raw deal in this modern era.

Marriage as an institution existed for various reasons, it was used to create familial ties, for political reasons, etc, but most importantly to give a sense of assurance to men that the children their wives gave birth do were indeed theirs (hence virginity being the key defining trait of "marriage material"), and they could pass down their name and wealth to their children.

For the same reason Female Promiscuity was shamed and led to social ostracization. Womens hypergamy had to be kept in check otherwise the relationship dynamics between men and women would fall apart and so would the "family unit" which is basically the "building block" of society.

Crimes like Rape were especially frowned upon because it made a woman unfit for marriage and ruined her entire life, it also went against the civility agreement between men who as a collective all wanted their respective women in their lives to be safe and remain "their women" and not be "tarnished" by another man.

I hope people get the point here, the purpose of these laws and societal norms were to ensure a code of conduct amongst men, so that we would as a collective agree to allow each other to pursue and court women in a safe and organized manner, unimpeded by other men in an "unfair" manner, we all had a fair chance. There was a "social contract" at play here.

In these modern times the social contract is no longer functioning, expecting men not to regress and go back to the days of rape and violence when the contract is no longer being enforced and/or adhered to, is what is truly outrageous, and not the acts themselves. Men aren't entitled to sex?, true I agree, but women aren't entitled to safety either, they never were entitled to it and they never will be, it was a "provision" offered by men to women for co-operating with men to facilitate the social contract. The safety resided within the rule set of the social contract, which is no longer at play here, so a significant and increasing number of males are seeing no reason to function as "civil" men, there's no logical reason too, why be civil when you essentially are not even part of civilization, civility its no longer to our benefit. Women's actions have thrown the entire system out of order, and the violent responses of men today are retaliatory. Society is basically trying to make average/below average males into somewhat of a "slave class" that offers their labor and utility, contributes to society, all while being barred from enjoying a basic pleasure that all the female citizens get to enjoy despite contributing less and having to risk their lives less.

Ask yourself who are really the crazy ones, the men who go out committing acts of violence or "opt out" of society, or the society that expected these men not to do this, despite significantly ruining the quality of life for the collective male populace, and having the gall to ask them to keep up their end of the social contract and be "good little boys and contribute to society as upstanding citizens" :feelskek:. Are you fucking serious, no wonder men are opting out of society, no wonder men are going out on murder rampages.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnmauldin/2017/03/09/american-men-are-giving-up-on-jobs/

There's no real motivation to bother trying, to be a "hard worker", to be "civilized", when your reward at the end of the day is to get married to used goods who is likely only settling for you because she's aged past her prime and has a ton of baggage, to top it off with no fault divorce laws she can easily just leave with half of your wealth, and modern society actually celebrates and endorses female promiscuity and cheating on men, so that great investment you made isn't even guaranteed to be solely yours to enjoy JFL. Men have literally no motivation to be "good people", anyone who thinks people should be "good" for the sake of "being good" is an illogical idiot that doesn't get how reality actually works.

In the bible there's heaven and hell, in human laws there are cash rewards for helping law enforcement with certain tasks, and there are fines and jail time for committing crimes or breaking minor laws.

GOOD AND EVIL CAN ONLY BE TRULY (OBJECTIVELY) DEFINED BY THE FACT THAT THERE ARE REWARDS AND PUNISHMENTS ASSOCIATED RESPECTIVELY, that is how we truly distinguish a good act from a bad one, if we rely on subjective opinion based criteria then anyone and everyone is both right and wrong, good and bad, based on their own personal reasonings and whims. If the bible said that no matter what you do everyone goes to heaven, but "please still don't sin" nobody would give a fuck about the rules, most every Christian would be sinning without any restraint or repentance, rules mean nothing without a reward and punishment system in place.

To address another cliche statement - "where have all the good men gone", I ask "by what objective criteria are you ascribing the label "good" ". Reinstate a sufficient "rewards system" for males and you'll see all those men come running back.

(unknown) #fundie contenderministries.org

The Baha'i faith has become a popular religion in an environment of ecumenism, inclusiveness and political correctness. Embraced eagerly by the United Nations and other interfaith organizations, Baha'i is a growing humanist influence on our world. There are currently 17,148 Local Spiritual Assemblies of the Baha'i faith in the world and 4,515 in the United States alone. Members claim a presence in 235 countries and their literature is translated into 700 languages with a total world membership estimated at 5,000,000. The following introduction is meant to be a brief overview Baha'i history, and is by no means an exhaustive history of Baha'i.

The popularity of Baha'i can largely be attributed to its attempts to unify all faiths, prophets and the entire human race. It embraces the humanist philosophy that all religions should be embraced equally because they are not contradictory and are merely successively updated versions of the same basic religious beliefs. They teach that all religions are the result of the same God and the differences stem only from the age in which they were revealed. They promote gender, racial, and economic equality; universal education; harmony between science and religion; balance between nature and technology; and the development of a world Federal system. Those who believe in absolute truths, such as those found in the Bible, are dismissed as intolerant and an obstacle to world peace.

Baha'i grew out of Islam, and is in fact a stepchild of the Islamic faith, albeit a despised one. Rather than naming Muhammad as the greatest of the prophets as the Muslims do, Baha'is hold Baha'u'llah to be the greatest of the prophets.

[...]

Baha'i Beliefs

Baha'i Claims to be Compatible with Christianity

The Baha'i faith incorporates many familiar Christian themes, words, and select scriptures into its beliefs, however, the Bible would have to be radically reinterpreted to fit Baha'i theology. Baha'is claim that the Bible has been misinterpreted and misunderstood by Christians for thousands of years, and therefore must be reinterpreted through Baha'i, which they believe is the true Christianity. Much like Mormonism, Islam and other religions founded by false prophets, Baha'i teaches that they have restored Christianity to its true form. Unlike Mormonism and Islam, however, they claim that Baha'u'llah was not just a prophet but the actual Messiah and a fulfillment of the prophesied Second Coming. This belief alone reveals serious flaws in their interpretation of the Bible. The prophecies of the Bible that are yet to be fulfilled before Christ returns are simply reinterpreted or ignored to support their belief that the Messiah has already returned. A look at other Baha'i beliefs further demonstrates the vast differences between the Baha'i faith and Biblical Christianity.

God is Unknowable

One goal of the Baha'i movement is to bring about an all-inclusive global faith under a federalist world government. Their views on the nature of God reflect this desire to include all beliefs, gods, and religions neatly into their belief system. In Baha'i thought, people can never really know God personally. They teach that God is so far beyond humans that no one can really know the essence of God. While Baha'i is clearly a monotheistic faith, an unknowable God means any god will fit the mold, whether it be Allah, Yahweh or Brahma. By ignoring what the Bible has to say about God, and putting him out of man's reach, they are free to worship anything and, in some cases, everything as God. By contrast, the Bible tells us that God reveals Himself to us (Hebrews 1:1-2), wants to be known (Isaiah 45:22-25; Hosea 11:1-11), and invites us into a relationship with Him (John 14:23; Revelation 3:20). He also makes false teachings about God evidence of a false prophet, and deserving of punishment (Deuteronomy 13:1-5).

Jesus Christ was a "Manifestation" of God

Baha'is view Jesus' as merely one of many manifestations or prophets of the divine. They also deny the deity of Christ and his miracles, and argue that Jesus never claimed to be God's only Son. They further deny that Jesus was God. In fact, Baha'i theology views Jesus as being inferior to Baha'u'llah, much as Islam views Jesus to be inferior to Muhammad. They argue that messianic passages such as Isaiah 9:2-7; 11:1-2; 40:1-5; and 53 are references to Baha'u'llah, and that the "Spirit of truth" that Jesus spoke of in John 14-16, was not the Holy Spirit, but was actually a reference to Baha'u'llah.

The Baha'is view Jesus death as insignificant and serving only as an example of self sacrifice. They don't believe that Christ rose from the dead, or that his death brought about salvation. They interpret the biblical account of Christ's resurrection as something that went on in the minds of the disciples, rather than a physical, literal resurrection. Abdul Baha said, "The disciples were troubled and agitated after the martyrdom of Christ...The Cause of Christ was like a lifeless body; and, when after three days the disciples became assured and steadfast...his religion found life, his teachings and his admonitions became evident and visible."1

In II Corinthians 11:4 the apostle Paul spoke of those who would believe in "another Jesus", other than the Jesus of the Bible. The Baha'i rendition of Jesus falls in this category.

[...]

Contrary to Baha'i claims, Jesus was an incarnation of God, not a manifestation (Isa. 7:14; John 1:1, 14, 18; Heb. 10:1-10; Phil. 2:5-11). The Bible says that to deny either the undiminished deity or the perfect humanity of Christ in the incarnation is to put oneself outside the pale of orthodoxy.

I John 4:2-3 "This is how you can recognize the Spirit of God: Every spirit that acknowledges that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is from God, but every spirit that does not acknowledge Jesus is not from God. This is the spirit of the antichrist, which you have heard is coming and even now is already in the world."

Paul further affirms that Christ is the fullness of the Deity in bodily form in Colossians 2:9.

The Bible makes it clear that Jesus is God the creator, the Immanuel, and God with us.

"The virgin will be with child and will give birth to a son, and they will call him Immanuel which means, 'God with us'". Matthew 1:23

Baha'u'llah in Biblical Prophecy

Baha'is claim that the Bible speaks of Baha'u'llah, however, the only reference to Baha'u'llah in the Bible is an indirect one when Jesus and the apostles warned of the coming of false prophets and false Christs (Matt. 7:15-16; 2 Cor. 11:13-15). The messianic verses from the Bible cited by Baha'is as referring to Baha'u'llah, can not truly support their claim because, among other things, Baha'u'llah was of Iranian descent, where the Messiah was to be Jewish (Matthew 1; Genesis 12:1-3; II Samuel 7:12-13). Also, the New Testament repeatedly cites the fulfillment of Isaiah's prophecies in the person of Jesus Christ (Matthew 1:1; 3:14; 8:17; Luke 1:31; Revelation 5:5).

The second coming of Christ also can not refer to Baha'u'llah. Scripture indicates that the very same Jesus who ascended into heaven will one day personally return (Acts 1:9-11). The Bible also prophesies several dramatic and highly visible signs that will accompany the Second Coming (Matthew 24:29). None of these signs were present when Baha'u'llah arrived on the scene. He also didn't show up in the right place. Scripture clearly indicates that at the Second Coming the Messiah will come to Jerusalem and his feet will physically touch the Mount of Olives (Zech. 14:4). Baha'u'llah never did this.

The Spirit of truth in John 16:12-13 also can't be referring to Baha'u'llah. John 14-16 clearly identifies the Spirit of Truth as being the Holy Spirit (John 14:16-17, 26). Jesus said that His promise of the Holy Spirit would be fulfilled "in a few days" (Acts 1:5), not in the 1800s when Baha'u'llah was born. That fulfillment came on the Day of Pentecost in Acts 2. The function of the Holy Spirit is to make known Jesus' teachings, not to replace them with the interpretations of another prophet. Jesus also said that the Holy Spirit would be with us forever (John 14:16). Baha'u'llah died in 1892 at the age of 75, far short of forever.

Ephesians 1:18-21 "I pray also that the eyes of your heart may be enlightened in order that you may know the hope to which he has called you, the riches of his glorious inheritance in the saints, and his incomparably great power for us who believe. That power is like the working of his mighty strength, which he exerted in Christ when he raised him from the dead and seated him at his right hand in the heavenly realms, far above all rule and authority, power and dominion, and every title that can be given, not only in the present age but also in the one to come."

Jesus is the Messiah and our salvation now and forevermore.

Chateau Heartiste #sexist heartiste.wordpress.com

Dating Market Value Test For Men

Here is a system for determining your dating market value if you are a man. Dating market value is a measurement of how you stack up against other men in the competition for attracting female interest. Be honest with yourself taking this survey. It will give you a fairly accurate assessment of the quality and number of women you are capable of attracting for a sexual relationship. Girls, you may take this quiz for your boyfriends to see if you are slumming it or about to be cheated on.

1. How old are you?

under 25 years old: 0 points
26-34 years old: +1 point
35-45 years old: 0 points
45+ years old: -1 point

2. How tall are you?

under 5’9?: -1 point
5’9? to 5’11”: 0 points
6' to 6’4?: +1 point
over 6’4?: 0 points

3. What is your BMI?

(Go here to calculate your BMI. I know BMI doesn’t account for very muscular physiques, but since most men are not Lee Haney, it is adequate for this survey’s purposes.)

under 20.0: -1 point
20.0 to 24.0: +1 point
24.1 to 27.0: 0 points
over 27.0: -1 point

4. How much do you bench press?

60% or less of your body weight: -1 point
61% to 80% of your body weight: 0 points
81% to 170% of your body weight: +1 point
over 170% of your body weight: 0 points

5. What does your hairline look like?

Full head of hair if you are over 35: +1 point
Full head of hair if you are under 35: 0 points
Receding hairline if you are over 35: 0 points
Receding hairline if you are under 35: -1 point
Bald (age irrelevant): -1 point
Bald but you are dark-skinned: 0 points

6. How much money do you make?

under $40K and you are out of college: -1 point
$40K to $70K out of college and under 40 years old: 0 points
over $70K out of college and under 40 years old: +1 point
under $40K and you are college age or younger: 0 points
$40K to $55K and over 40 years old: -1 point
$55K to $90K and over 40 years old: 0 points
over $90K and 40 to 55 years old: +1 point
over $200K (age irrelevant): +1 point

7. Do you have a car?

No (under 21yo): 0 points
No (over 21yo): -1 point
Yes (under 21yo): +1 point
Yes (over 21yo): 0 points
No, but you have a motorcycle (age irrelevant): +1 point

8. Are you good-looking?

(Self-assessment is somewhat unreliable, so if you are uncertain of your looks post your pic on hotornot and wait a week for your score. Or get opinions from unbiased and blunt friends. Hashing out the biometric details of what makes a male face attractive would require another lengthy post, so for now these two methods are acceptable substitutes.)

On a 1 – 10 scale:

0 – 4: -1 point
5 – 7: 0 points
8 – 10: +1 point

9. Have you ever played a leading role in a team sport?

No: 0 points
Yes: +1 point

10. What is your occupation?

(Since I won’t list every single high status job in the Department of Labor’s Occupational Handbook, you’ll have to make a judgment call on your own job. It’s a safe assumption that most people know a high status job when they see it.)

High status (doctor, lawyer, stockbroker, executive, professor, business owner, successful artist or musician or writer, professional athlete, etc.): +1 point
Neutral status (engineer, programmer, accountant, salesman, mid level manager, scientist, military officer, well-paid tradesman, etc.): 0 points
Low status (low paid blue collar, admin, construction, janitor, struggling web designer, help desk, etc.): -1 point

11. How many friends do you have?

0 to 3: -1 point
4 to 20: 0 points
over 20: +1 point

12. How many friends have you met through the internet that you have never seen in person?

0 to 2: 0 points
over 2: -1 point

13. When was the last time you went to a house party?

Within the past month: +1 point
Between one month and one year ago: 0 points
Over one year ago: -1 point

14. Have people besides your family called you funny?

None: -1 point
A few have: 0 points
Nearly everyone who knows me: +1 point

15. What is your IQ?

Under 85: -1 point
85 to 110: 0 points
110 to 130: +1 point
130 to 145: 0 points
over 145: -1 point

16. At a party, which happens first – you approach someone or someone approaches you?

I approach someone first almost every time: +1 point
I occasionally approach first: 0 points
Someone normally approaches me first: -1 point

17. Have you ever been in a serious fight where real punches were thrown and you felt like you wanted to kill your opponent(s)?

No: 0 points
Yes: +1 point
Yes, with a girl: -1 point

18. Have you ever been arrested?

No: 0 points
Yes: +1 point
Yes, for child pornography or public exposure: -1 point

****

It’s best to answer the following four questions based on your past experience with similar scenarios. Who we really are is not what we wish we were but what we have always been.

19. You are on a second date with a girl. You go to kiss her. She turns her cheek to you and says “Slow down, I’m not that kind of girl.” You reply:

(A) “Sorry.”
(B) “Yeah, well, no prob.”
(C) “This could be trouble ’cause I’m that kind of guy.” *smirk*

If you answered (A), subtract a point.
If (B), no points.
If (C), add a point.

20. You’re chatting up a pretty girl you just met in a bar. After a few minutes she asks you to buy her a drink. You reply:

(A) “Sure.”
(B) “I’m not an ATM.”
(C) “No, but you can buy me one.”

If you answered (A), subtract a point.
If (B), no points.
If (C), add a point.

21. You’ve just met a cute girl in a club and have been talking with her for five minutes when she abruptly changes the topic to a raunchy conversation about her multiorgasmic ability. You respond with:

(A) a huge grin and an eager “Damn! That is HOT!”
(B) a look of mild disdain.
(C) a raised eyebrow while saying “Hey, thanks for the medical report.”

If you answered (A), subtract a point.
If (B), no points.
If (C), add a point.

22. The pickup has been going well. Later in the night she leans in and begins making out with you passionately. You feel like a king and your jeans suddenly feel much tighter. Do you:

(A) immediately grope her boob in return.
(B) continue making out with her for as long as she wishes.
(C) kiss for a little bit then push her gently away and look distracted for a second.

If you answered (A), subtract a point.
If (B), no points.
If (C), add a point.

And finally, the critical thinking portion of the quiz. The following questions are based on the progression of a single pickup attempt.

23. You go to a bar. Twenty feet away are a pretty girl, a fat girl, and an average guy talking amongst themselves. The pretty girl briefly eye flirts with you. In reponse, you:

(A) eye flirt back and forth a few times before approaching 20 minutes later.
(B) immediately approach in a direct fashion maintaining strong eye contact with your target.
(C) immediately approach but from an indirect angle, looking around the room distractedly on the way over to your target as if you might see an even prettier girl somewhere else, and finally delivering your opener from over your shoulder.

(A): -1 point
(B): 0 points
(C): +1 point

24. Who do you address first?

(A) the pretty girl.
(B) the fat girl.
(C) everyone.

(A): -1 point
(B): 0 points
(C): +1 point

25. After getting the whole group engaged in conversation and having a good time, your target blurts out “Hey nice pink shirt! Are you gay?” You:

(A) say “No, I’m not gay!”
(B) ignore her.
(C) say “OK, who brought their little sister to the bar!”

(A): -1 point
(B): 0 points
(C): +1 point

26. In the middle of the conversation you have to pee. You say:

(A) “I have to go to the bathroom. I’ll be right back.”
(B) “Excuse me.”
(C) nothing. Just go.

(A): -1 point
(B): 0 points
(C): +1 point

27. You’ve managed to get her outside your front door. There is obvious sexual tension. You want to close this deal. You say:

(A) “So, um, ah, see you around.”
(B) “Why don’t you come inside?”
(C) “I’m thirsty. Are you thirsty? Let’s go inside and taste DC’s finest tap water. But you can only stay for a minute, I have to get up early.”

(A): -1 point
(B): 0 points
(C): +1 point

****

SCORES

There are 26 points to earn or lose based on the questions asked. The scoring breaks down as follows:

-26: Why are you still alive?
-25 to -20: You’re an omega. Celibacy has its charms.
-19 to -15: You actively repulse girls. Your kind will usher forth the sexbot revolution.
-14 to -10: You’re always getted foisted onto the warpigs.
-9 to 0: Lesser beta. You don’t immediately disgust girls; they just don’t notice you. With much painful effort you can redeem yourself.
1 to 9: Classic beta. You catch some girls’ eyes, usually the ones you don’t want. Try not to make fatty fucking a lifestyle.
10 to 14: A few attractive girls in the bar will be intrigued by your presence. But you need game to close the deal.
15 to 19: Congrats, you have crossed the alpha Rubicon. A lot of cute girls will be pleased when you hit on them. But you can still fuck up by being yourself.
20 to 25: You’re a natural. Many hot girls check you out and forgive your occasional pickup blunders. You always have a look of sexual satisfaction on your face.
26: Super Alpha. Booty sticks to you like bird shit on car roofs.

(Submitter's note: Compare and contrast Dating Market Value Test For Women)

Patrick Scrivener #conspiracy reformation.org

Nobody died at Sandy Hook Elementary School!!

In October 1922, Benito Mussolini and his infamous Blackshirts marched on Rome and Fascism was born. Incredibly, the Fascist Revolution was also engineered by the very same man who engineered the Bolshevik Revolution.

The German variety of Fascism was called Nazism. The Papal hierarchy in the United States is run by the Jesuits and they report to the Jesuit general in Rome. Even though Satan controls them both, Romanism in the U.S. has much more in common with Fascism than with Nazism.

The Sandy Hook Elementary School was opened in the great year of 1956.

It was closed in 2008.

In December 2012, it was used for a gun-banning false flag operation.

Unfortunately, the days of Popish plots and St. Bartholomew's Day Massacres are not over yet. Daniel the Prophet predicted that Antichrist would have one last fling before the end of time:

And he (Antichrist) shall plant the tabernacles of his palace between the seas in the glorious holy mountain; yet he shall come to his end, and none shall help him (Daniel 11: 45).

In order for Antichrist to take over the United States of Israel, he must DISARM the people first. That was what the FEMA drill or false flag operation was all about.

The Sandy Hook drill involved the White House, MI6, CIA, the Pentagon, FEMA, Romeland Security, Knights of Columbus, General Electric, FBI etc., etc.

The drill also cost millions of dollars of the taxpayers money to produce.

Immediately after the drill, President Obama went on the offensive against the Second Amendment to the Constitution:

A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. (Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution).

The Connecticut charter of 1639 is actually the mother of the U.S. Constitution. That charter doesn't mention guns because everybody knew that their very survival depended on faith and firearms.

Big government, big business, and big false religion combined in an unholy alliance to use LITTLE CHILDREN in a desperate attempt to repeal the Second Amendment.

Planning for the drill must have taken years, and its total cost in hiring actors and making the drill look real was truly astronomical. However, the Jesuit motto has always been "the end justifies the means."

The British owned behemoth called General Electric controls most of the mainstream media.

The Knights of Columbus are the foot soldiers of the Jesuits in the United States.

Together, they have hijacked the Constitution State!!

In the Book of Esther in the Holy Bible, a very similar situation existed as today. The wicked Haman had planned to exterminate all the Jews in the Persian Empire. At the risk of her life, Queen Esther went boldly in to King Xerxes and implored him to allow the Jews in his vast empire to be armed for self-defense:

The king's edict granted the Jews which were in every city to assemble themselves together, and to engage in self-defense, to destroy, to kill, and to annihilate, any armed force of any people or province that would attack them, both their little children and women, and to plunder their property (Esther 8:11, Scrivener translation).

King Xerxes, even though he was a pagan, allowed all the Jews in his empire to be armed. That is what the Second Amendment to the Constitution is all about: self-defense against a U.S. Saint Bartholomew's Day Massacre. Without the Second Amendment, the First Amendment would be useless:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. (First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution).

In the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, the Jesuits absolutely condemn freedom of religion and teach that the "Church" can use force to compel their disarmed slaves.

The Exodus is a marvelous type of Armageddon and the end of the world. When the Egyptians were pursuing the children of Israel at the Red Sea, JEHOVAH sent his MECHANIC-ANGELS to pull off the wheels of their chariots–in order to slow them down:

And it came to pass, that in the morning watch that JEHOVAH looked unto the host of the Egyptians through the pillar of fire and of the cloud, and troubled the host of the Egyptians, and took off their chariot wheels, that they drove them heavily: so that the Egyptians said, "let us flee from the face of Israel; for JEHOVAH fighteth for them against the Egyptians" (Exodus:14:24-25).

In these last days we cannot stop the Second Amendment destroying false flag operations, but we can expose the latter day Haman's to the light of day and slow them down a little.

Amazon.com banned the book Nobody Died At Sandy Hook!!

Incredibly, almost everything is for sale on Amazon.com . . . except for a book about the Sandy Hook drill, edited by James Fetzer. The colonial era was ended by President Eisenhower in 1956, and the book censorship era was supposed to end with the Internet.

Contact Amazon.com and remind them about the First Amendment. Tell them that the era of censorship has ended for good in the land of the free and the home of the brave.

David J. Stewart and David Hyles #fundie godlovespeople.com

Psalms 11:7, “For the righteous LORD loveth righteousness; his countenance doth behold the upright.”

I very much admire the following words below, penned by David Hyles to address his army of internet critics; but first, let me give you some introduction. David is the beloved son of Dr. Jack Hyles (1926-2001), the legendary former pastor of the First Baptist Church of Hammond, Indiana for over 42 years. It is no secret that all humans are sinners by birth, inherent to our nature. David Hyles' has been much criticized for his sins and bad choices in life, but he has repented openly and apologized. Yet, the diatribes (thundering verbal attacks) from David critics are relentless, merciless and saturated with hated.

The Bible teaches that some people's sins are open (known) beforehand here on earth (such as David's). But the Bible teaches that everyone else's sins will follow them and be revealed in eternity, causing shame and reproach...

1st Timothy 5:24, “Some men's sins are open beforehand,
going before to judgment; and some men they follow after.”

David Hyles' alleged sins are openly known beforehand, just as the Bible teaches; but every person who has ever been born is a sinner and our sins will be made open for all to see in eternity. No one will be able to retain a cocky and arrogant attitude toward others who have sinned when we stand in judgment before God. If the truth be known, everyone is a horrible sinner. People who are fortunate enough to live above reproach find it easy to condemn others who openly sin (or their sins become openly revealed). If all of our sins were known, no one would ever be able to slander, gossip or criticize others who sin. NO ONE is a shining example to be held up as the standard of perfection, except the precious Lord Jesus Christ, Who is the spotless “Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world” (John 1:29).

In his own words, David Hyles appeals to his critics with God's love, pointing out five evils caused by their hurtful attacks...

“First you are hurting the lost. Several years ago I worked with a young man who knew I was a Christian. This young man was searching. He had dabbled into several religions in his search. He respected me and began to question me about Christ. God was working in his life and I felt he was very close to accepting Christ as his Savior. Someone, in an attempt to hurt my business began circulating an email through my workplace and he received it, anonymously, of course. He never again listened to me and eventually our paths parted. I pray every day for God to save him. It was not MY sins that turned him away. No, actually it was the evil spirit of those my accusers who claimed to be Christians. He wanted no part of that.

Secondly, you are hurting the fallen. Countless Christians have seen what you have done to me and to others who have fallen and decided to just disappear rather than being restored. I believe that there have been suicides and other tragedies that could have been prevented if a fallen brother or sister had felt there was hope. You diatribes on your filthy forums serve Satan’s purpose well.

Thirdly you are hurting those who I have hurt. Please hear me on this. Every fallen pastor or Christian leaves hurting people in their sinful wake. I did. I know that. It breaks my heart. David did too and his heart was broken. There is little we can do to repair the damage. Their deliverance must come from God and it will not come from revenge or retribution. It will come only from forgiveness. Please allow God to be God and to deal with his children as He will. Stay out of it and encourage those who have been hurt to find their peace from God not from your vigilante system of internet justice.

Allow me to elaborate on this just a bit more. People who are hurt by a sinner are destroyed by bitterness. No one’s sin can destroy your life. Our loving Father would not allow that. He stands ready as a loving Father to pick you up and mend your broken heart. Sinners (and that includes us all) do bad things that affect other’s lives. For all have sinned… However, if we get them to take their eyes off of the offender and place it on the Savior they can be healed. Closure does not come from our flawed idea of justice. It comes from letting God heal us even as He deals with the one who offended or hurt us.

Fourthly you are hurting you! The manure you are hurling fails to hit me but your hands sure do smell of the filth you have no business picking up. I am sorry for the pain that makes you feel that somehow you will gain some kind of satisfaction from trying to hurt me. I wish this book could give you the peace you are lacking but I sincerely doubt it will.

Finally and most importantly, you are hurting the Father. I have news for you that is not going to please you, but here goes. GOD LOVES ME and I AM SAVED AND FORGIVEN! I fell but, you see, when a Christian falls we do not fall away from grace, we fall into it, hence the name of this book. I am in His grace and one day I will stand before Him clothed in the righteousness of His Son and not the sin of my own. Why would you dare try and hurt the heart of God? Is it because there is unconfessed sin in your life? Are you so far from Him that you have lost the sweetness of His mercy and grace in your own life? That is sad.”

We are all sinners. Who are you, me or anyone else to condemn someone for their sins. James 4:12, “There is one lawgiver, who is able to save and to destroy: who art thou that judgest another?” God is our eternal Judge, and we are cautioned to be careful how we judge others, for the Lord will treat us the same way that we treat others (Matthew 7:1-5).

I love what David Hyles says about “Fallen Into Grace,” rather than “falling from grace” as Calvinists errantly teach. When the apostle Paul speaks of falling from grace, he simply means that a person who rejects Christ cannot be saved any other way. Galatians 5:4, “Christ is become of no effect unto you, whosoever of you are justified by the law; ye are fallen from grace.” False teachers say that a believer loses their salvation when they sin. The Bible calls them liars. Being born-again is a birth (a spiritual, second, new birth), and is as irreversible as the first, physical, natural birth. If saved, always saved!

Some people are so filled with malicious hatred that they have decided that David Hyles could never be saved. The Bible warns in Matthew 7:1-5 that God will one day judge critics and scorners by the SAME measure by which they have judged others. So if you mistreat someone and condemn them without mercy, God will treat you the same one day unless you repent. I would 10,000 times rather be a humiliated big sinner in men's eyes, than to be a self-righteous hypocrite who's filled with hatred and scorn toward someone who has sinned. To point a finger of condemnation at anyone is to have three of our own fingers pointing right back at us.

When a Christian sins, we are not fallen from grace; but rather, we have fallen into God's wondrous grace. God's mercy is abundant. The Lord promises to forgive those who come to Him. 1st John 1:9, “If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.”

I also love what David Hyles says...

“I am in His grace and one day I will stand before Him clothed in the righteousness of His Son and not the sin of my own.”

David Hyles as a genuine Christian fully realizes that salvation is only possible through Christ's imputed righteousness, and not by any self-righteousness of our own. Christ bore our burden of sins upon Himself on the cross. There's no way that you nor I, nor anyone else, could ever bear the weight of our own sins. Have you ever found yourself looking at an impossible situation, wondering how your life could ever become so messed up, realizing that there's no way humanly possible to ever make things right? I've been there! But when I had those thoughts the Lord impressed a truth upon my heart, saying, “You're right, you could never make things right, no matter how hard you try. That's why I went to the cross and paid your sin debt... so I could make things right!” It's Jesus precious blood that He sacrificed for our sins that makes everything right in God's eyes!

Many religious people are trying to make things right in their own human strength, as did Adam with his fig-leaf religion. God rejected Adam's fig-leaves and killed an innocent animal instead, shedding its blood which represented the coming Lamb of God, the Messiah, Who would one day die on the cross for the sins of the world. Thank you Lord Jesus!

Conclusion

When the truth is known, ALL PEOPLE will be exposed as wicked and shameful sinners. When asked to give the name of the worst and most horrible sinners we know, most people tend to think of people besides them self. This is the hypocritical nature of humanity. This is why all gossip is sinful and wrong, that is, because we are just as sinful as the people that we criticize. James 4:12, “There is one lawgiver, who is able to save and to destroy: who art thou that judgest another?” No one has any right to talk bad in public about Christians who have fallen. Satan always brings up past sins to discourage us, but the Holy Spirit only convicts us about present sins that need to be confessed and forsaken.

A person is never more like Satan than when they point a finger of damnation toward others. Revelation 12:10, “And I heard a loud voice saying in heaven, Now is come salvation, and strength, and the kingdom of our God, and the power of his Christ: for the accuser of our brethren is cast down, which accused them before our God day and night.” Satan accuses believers round-the-clock before the throne of God, continually pointing out the hypocrisy, sins and failures of God's children. Most gossip is true, which is what makes it so dangerous. Proverbs 11:9, “An hypocrite with his mouth destroyeth his neighbour: but through knowledge shall the just be delivered.”

David's enemies will condemn him to his grave, as did king David's enemies in the Bible; but thanks be to God, only God can condemn a person to Hell and there is no condemnation upon Christian believers who have faith in Christ Jesus (Romans 8:1). The Lord showed me one day while reading the Psalms that the reason for king David's enemies was his sins of adultery, conspiracy and murder. The words “enemy” and “enemies” appear 103 times in Psalms. David's enemies condemned him to his grave, continually trying to destroy him, but God protected him.

The Lord knows that I have many enemies as a fighting fundamental preacher, and many people slander and say garbage about me all the time. I don't read gossip, so it cannot affect me. I don't know what my critics say about me. I'm too busy serving the Lord to stop and see how I'm doing or what critics are saying about me. The only opinion that matters to me is God's. Revelation 4:11 says that we were all created for God's pleasure.

Thank God for the gift of His dear only begotten Son, Jesus, the Christ. If it weren't for God's love, mercy and grace that sent Jesus to Calvary to shed His blood for our sins, we would all be doomed to eternity in Hell.

Ironically, the very scorners who accuse fallen Christians of not being saved are likely not saved themselves. The Bible teaches that hatred for others is a sign that we've never been saved. 1st John 3:15-16, “Whosoever hateth his brother is a murderer: and ye know that no murderer hath eternal life abiding in him. Hereby perceive we the love of God, because he laid down his life for us: and we ought to lay down our lives for the brethren.” Dr. Hyles often stated in his sermons that, “The Christian army is the only army in the world that slays its wounded.” This is because most believers are carnally-minded, walking in the flesh instead of the Spirit. Galatians 5:25, “If we live in the Spirit, let us also walk in the Spirit.” Every Christian believer has the Holy Spirit living within their body (1st Corinthians 3:17-18; Romans 8:9). The Bible is saying in Galatians 3:25 that we ought to also walk in the Spirit Who indwells us. As Christians we continually have to decide whether we are going to walk in the sinful flesh or the Spirit of God Who came to live within us the moment that we were born-again (saved). It's a constant battle (Romans 7:14-25; 1st Peter 2:11).

All men and women are sinners. We are not sinners because we sin; but rather, we sin because we are sinners. Jeremiah 17:9 teaches that the human heart is desperately wicked and deceitful above all else. The Bible plainly teaches that all men are equally as guilty of sin in God's eyes. James 2:10, “For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all.” Committing even one sin is enough to send a person to the Lake of Fire forever and ever. That's why God sent His Son into the world to die on Calvary's cross to pay our sin debt.

So please remember, whoever you may be, that when we sin as Christian believers we don't fall from grace; but rather, we fall into God's grace because of the imputed righteousness of Jesus Christ.

Unknown author #fundie mcknowledge.info

The Vedic civilization, according to the ancient scriptures, was at a much higher level of development than our modern society. In Sanskrit “veda” means knowledge. So what kind of knowledge are we talking about? From the standpoint of current evolutionary theory, the human race is supposed to be at the top of the society development. However, according to the Vedic literature, in a distant past there have been civilizations in the world, the greatness of which we cannot even imagine. A detailed study of the Vedic texts was held in Bombay in 1975.

It was a scientific “explosion” in physicist circles when the scientists have discovered the vivid description of subatomic level in the Vedas written some five thousand years ago. For example, it is stated in the Bhagavata Purana: “The material manifestation’s ultimate particle, which is indivisible and not formed into a body, is called the atom – Param anuh. It exists always as an invisible identity, even after the dissolution of all forms. The material body is but a combination of such atoms, but it is misunderstood by the common man. ” (Bhagavata Purana 3.11.1) In the same Bhagavata Purana the different time scales are explained, starting with the atomic. The theory of relativity and quantum physics can be substantially supplemented by information from the Sanskrit texts. Aryans were well aware of such concepts as superconductivity, nuclear and plasma weapons not to mention electricity.

The Mahabharata, an ancient historical epic, describes the use of nuclear weapons as follows: “It was as if all the nature’s forces have been suddenly unleashed. Something dazzling like the sun revolved in circles. Burned with a heat of this weapon, the world was staggering, as in a fever. Elephants caught fire from the heat and rushed wildly hither and thither in search of protection from the terrible power. Water in the sea turned hot, the animals were dying, the foes were killed and trees were falling in rows under the fury of the forest fire. Elephants blew their trunks fiercely and fell dead on the ground. Horses and chariots were burned on the spot. Thus, thousands of enemy chariots were destroyed, and then deep silence descended on the sea. Wind began to blow and the earth shined. It was a terrible sight. The corpses of the fallen were mutilated by terrible heat so that they no longer resembled people. Never before have we seen such a terrible weapon and did not hear about it. ” (Drona-parva)

The Vedic texts contain a large number of descriptions of different types of weapons, ranging from primitive stone throwing slings (sarvatobhadra), wall smashing mechanisms (udghatima), to all sorts of high velocity dart throwing devices (yantra-sara), and ending with weapons which damaging force does not have modern analogues. The tenth canto of Bhagavata Purana describes the various battles with weapons of extraordinary power. Those battles were fought by our ancient ancestors inhabited the planet, as well as representatives from other worlds. “… Then demon Bhaumasura immediately released the fire weapon, known as shatagnhi, by which he could kill hundreds of soldiers with one stroke.” (Bhagavata purana 10.59.15) There were weapons similar to raging nature’s forces. “… He (Vasudeva) contaracted brahmastra with another brahmastra, and the air weapon – with the mountain weapon”.

So on one side they used the “vayavya-astra” weapon, causing severe hurricane on the battlefield, and in order to counteract it the opposite side immediately used the so-called ” mountain weapon ” which just like a mountain could block the air flow and eliminate it completely. The weapon “shiva-jvara” is described as heat, which is twelve times more powerful than heat of the sun, and the weapon “narayana-jvara” represents the unbearable cold. “By that time, almost all the warriors of Shalva were killed, but when he saw that Vasudeva has arrived on the battlefield, he set in motion a terrible weapon of extraordinary power, which flew with a roar in the sky like a giant meteor. It shone with a dazzling, illuminating the sky… “ It is obvious that our ancestors were much more highly developed than we are today. Comparing to them we look like babies, at least in technical terms. “ It was not an easy task to enter into the city of Prajyotisha-pura, because it was very well fortified. First of all, there were four formidable forts guarding the four directions of the city, and it was well-protected on all sides by formidable military strength. The next boundary was a water canal all around the city, and in addition the whole city was surrounded with electric wires. The next fortification was of anila, a gaseous substance. After this, there was a network of barbed wiring constructed by a demon of the name Mura.” (Bhagavata Purana, 10 canto)

It appeared that the city was well-protected even in terms of today’s scientific advancement. In Vedic literature there are many references to flying saucers. In general, they are called the vimana. Vimanas in the Vedas are divided into two categories: 1) the mechanical machines, similar to airplanes and flying with wings like a bird; 2) and very complex machines that can not be precisely classified, which had unlimited possibilities. Machines of the first category are described mainly in medieval writings in Sanskrit, along with other various automatic devices and military machines. For example, Bhoja describes an aircraft made of lightwood, which looked like a bird with two wings. The driving force of the apparatus was generated in the fire chamber with mercury, installed on it, as well as flapping wings of the machine.

The devices of the second category are described in ancient books, such as the Rig Veda, the Mahabharata, Ramayana and Puranas, and their description in many ways are similar to modern descriptions of UFOs. The main work in Sanskrit, which includes the classification of ships of all kinds, is called Vimanika-shastra. This work also reveals all sorts of technologies that are known today, such as telephone and television, though, working on an entirely different, unknown to today’s science principles.

Here’s how the vimanas are described in the Ramayana: “The ship of Rakshasa king (type of demonic creatures) Ravana was amazing. Its walls were glittering, incrusted with diamonds, and the windows were skillfully decorated with gold. The ship could fly in any trajectory, regardless of wind direction, subject only to request of a pilot. He could stand still in the sky at any height, resembling a great shining mountain. The ship had a symmetrical design; the towers of the great artistic work were completed with domes, like mountain peaks. The viman could change its appearance through a variety of devices. After landing, it could camouflage itself as a mountain, lit up by the risen moon. Inside this beautiful spaceship resembled a palace with halls, rooms, swimming pools, etc.”

When we think of our ancestors, according to modern tradition, the image suggests a primitive ape-man with a hefty cudgel in his hands. However, the Vedic descriptions paint a different picture: “I have heard that Visvavasu, the great Gandharva (type of celestial singers), his mind stupefied with infatuation, fell from his airplane after seeing your daughter playing with a ball on the roof of the palace – harmya-prishthe, for she was indeed beautiful with her tinkling ankle bells and her eyes moving to and fro.” (Bhagavata Purana 3.22.17)

It is understood that not only at the present moment but in those days also there were skyscrapers. Herein we find the word harmya-prishthe. The literal translation of the word “harmya” is “a very high palace.” Svad vimanat means “from his own airplane.” It is suggested that private airplanes existed several thousand years ago. There are even descriptions of the whole flying cities, spreading for several square miles. For example, Hastinapura – a moving city, was well armed and protected against external enemies… Mathematics, mechanics and related engineering discipline could be raised to a new level thanks to the Vedic scriptures. In Sanskrit, a machine is called “yantra” which is explained in the Vedic literature as “a device that controls and directs the movement of objects in accordance with their characteristics.”

There are many types of yantras. A simple example might be a taila-yantra – the wheel, pushed by a bull in circles for oil pressing from seeds. Technical devices and machines of the ancient Aryans still amaze us with the level of their engineering skill. There are many plausible descriptions of robots, which were kept at the royal palaces, such as singing and dancing birds, resembling the living ones, clocks with moving figures, and various astronomical models, showing the motion of the planets. There were robots designed in the form of male and female figures that performed various functions. They were made mostly of wood, but perfectly covered with humanlike skin. Their motions were provided by the system of bolts, iron rods, springs and grooves. These figures played musical instruments, served drinks to guests and did other similar services. Yantrapurusha or man-machine could behave exactly like a real human. It is described in Bhagaya-vastu how an artist visited home of the yantracharya, or a teacher of mechanical engineering. There he was met by a robot-girl who washed his feet and had a resemblance of a real person until he realized that she was unable to speak. However, it is known that there were even speaking and absolutely fantastic sounding robots.

Are we able now, with all our modern science and computer technology, to repeat a similar level of inventive skill? Can we believe that the technical progress, as it is described in the Vedas, has really existed on Earth? Are Sanskrit texts the only proof of greatness of that ancient civilization? In order to answer these questions, it would be sufficient to analyze briefly the most famous archaeological monuments of antiquity. For example, in Delhi there is a metal column, known worldwide as “a pillar of Indra.” For several millennia, it has resisted the influence of precipitation, with no trace of rust. The column is made of atomic iron, without admixture of carbon and sulfur at the molecular level. In our time, it is possible to reproduce such a perfectly pure iron only with the sputter coating technique in the outer space and only in small quantities. The height of “Indra’s pillar” corresponds to the three-storey house, in fact, the column goes under the earth for a few tens of meters. How did they do it, what mechanisms were used to produce this miracle?

In the Hari Bhakti Vilas, written by Sanatana Goswami, it is said: “As bell metal (bronze) is turned into gold when mixed with mercury in an alchemical process, so in that very way, by the process of proper initiation by a bona fide spiritual master – diksa vidhanena, a person becomes a brahmana.” (Hari Bhakti Vilasa 2.12) The Vedas can give us tremendous knowledge, both material and spiritual. The greatest culture of people, who could turn a simple bronze into gold, is definitely able to revive our morally degraded society and add great deal of value to our lives.

Auxfite #sexist reddit.com

What i've learned from cold approaching over 350 women

What i've learned from cold approaching over 350 women
Past 5-6 months I’ve probably cold approached around 300-400 girls

Things I've learned:

1. Cougars go for young men because they missed out on hypergamy at a young age. Due to FOMO (Fear of missing out)

2. Cold approaching women at college parties, Clubs is as easy as ever. I cant remember a time i got rejected once. I simply go up to her ask her whatever vibe i feel from her. They will never be angry or mad at you or turn you off. In fact women are more than willing to give you their snapchat if you ask. Ive learned that rejection comes from them giving you their social media but never opening your stories ONCE. they simply just used you for validation.

3. Location is very important part in where you cold approach you have a way better success rate @ parties, clubs, and bars but places like the grocery store, shopping, a park will catch a women off guard and she will be creeped out. But when you display high value she then will be interested to hear what else you have to say and honestly its not worth the effort i hate giving girls free validation and attention. my success rate at parties was 9/10. outside of that environment 2-3/10. Las Vegas is probably the easiest place in the world to game and cold approach. Law 4: Always say less than necessary

4. The cure to stop being a beta (which 85-90% of men in the USA suffer from) is to take action and boost your testosterone by lifting heavy ass weights 4-5x a week. Women are attracted to masculine as men are attracted to feminine women. So do whatever it takes to boost your test (I don't advice steroids or TRT). Eat healthy fats (avocados, grass fed beef, eggs, almonds, etc) lift, lift, lift, avoid soy, stop watching porn, and stop fapping everyday. Its proven fact that your testosterone gets a small boost when you stop fapping for a week. Before TRP i was 60% alpha 40% beta and how i cured my betaness was going to the gym 5-6x a week. Instead of being the average guy to make excuses and complain I went out and did the work and what i sowed i reaped. Law 25: Re-create yourself

5. As i got more experience it became very very easy to spot out damaged goods, alpha widows, and BPD. These girls are the empty ones who post nudes or sexual pics on social media or are constantly seeking validation to fill the emptiness. These girls are usually the ones with tattoos, wear lots of make up (to hide the insecurities), wear tight clothes and try to reveal as much as possible, the bigger the hoop earning the bigger the hoe, they give you the thousand cock stare, they have piercings outside of their ears, they talk about their exes, they post on social media EVERYDAY. Damage pair bond is real and its affecting the younger generation more than ever and its because everything is become accepted and apps like tinder dont help, Hollywood music artist like Cardi B & Nicki Minaj promote the dominate female and how being a whore is how to get ahead. The divorce rate in the last 10 years is up 60% and its only going to grow higher.

6. Men SMV doesn't peak till 40. I'm in my mid 20s and i know that if i was in my early 20s i wouldn't be able to have this much success due to my facial features (women like masclinality) so my advice to the young men out here know you are super blessed to discover TRP at a young age. As you see i approach this many women and i dont feel anything special about it. Just like how rich people say money doesnt bring you happiness its the same with women. I didnt find a wife or someone who can raise my kids so i gained nothing out of this. So focus on becoming your best version of yourself, try out monk mode, hit the gym, read as much as you can, learn the stock market and cryptocurrency cycles. When you go out and have fun dont just game girls go out and befriend bros. read as much of the TRP as you can, find a spiritual life, and find balance. Dont rely on anything like drugs,alcohol,women to bring you happiness because its all temporary. Law 29: Plan all the way to the end

7. Young women are more damaged as ever. Pick your poison 1 Hot 2 Single 3 Sane. You can only pick 2

8. If you meet a girl and make plans with her and she flakes ghost her and dont even bother watching her stories or trying to get in contact with her and watch her hamster spin. If she sees youre high value she will hit you back up (FOMO). this works especially with high ego, low attention span millennial girls. (Law 8: Make other people come to you – use bait if necessary)

9. When your friends or others see your success with women they will start treating you like a god. But they are just using you for what you can provide and offer(clout chasers). Dont be confused and think they are your friends they are your enemy. (Crab in a bucket) Drop your loser friends (beta males) Low-T attitudes are contagious. Being friends with emasculated men that are pussy-whipped and passive is toxic. The same goes for your friends that do nothing but drink beer and watch sports highlights on the weekends. You are the average of the 5 people you spend the most time with, and high-T men have high-T friends Law 2: Never put too much trust in friends, learn to use enemies

10. Women are more attracted to you when they see you with other girls. It hamsters in their brain what does she see in him? I don’t really know how to put this in words but it’s true

Please don't forget to read Part 1 I commented it below.

My background and stats. African/Caribbean.. in my mid 20s, Live in the liberal SF Bay Area, 6'0..

To those asking how do i know i approach this much? My snapchat stories went from 40 views to 300s and majority of the people i added were females.

PLEASE PLEASE READ 48 LAWS OF POWER. Become the Machiavellian women desire. Jesus Christ is King! Happy holidays to you and your family!

Eugene McCarthy #crackpot macroevolution.net

Human-chicken Hybrids
Page 1: The Hühnermensch
­

Caution: Some readers may find this page disturbing.
_____
Note: Although the report quoted on this page states that a woman gave birth to the specimen in question, all other allegations of human-chicken hybrids seem to refer to offspring hatched by chickens.
_____
Note: In listing reports of hybrids, it has been my policy to include all serious allegations, especially those of scholars, whether or not the hybrid alleged seems possible or likely to me. This policy, I think, helps to eliminate subjective judgment on my part, and therefore should remove at least one source of systematic bias from my work. It also helps to fulfill the ethical obligation of telling not just the truth, but the whole truth.
_____
imageThe Hühnermensch (as depicted in Friderici 1737). (Enlarge) The original engraving is life-sized (crown-rump length of subject is 20 cm). A: red-pigmented structure similar to the comb of a domestic fowl; B: sparse, downy hair; C: circular eye openings (as in G. gallus); D: red periophthalmic rings (as in G. gallus); E and F: nasal opening with rudimentary nares; G: oral cavity; g: external tongue (or wattle?); H: the “upper extremities are not unlike those of a plucked chicken”; I: hands with lengthy fingers and “claws exactly like those of a chicken”; K: umbilical cord; L: “The deformed feet, which are in an abnormal position and attached to chicken-like shanks, are, with the exception of their soles, of a wholly unwonted form, with the toes marvelously distorted and tipped with claws that are likewise exactly those of a domestic chicken”; M: cutaneous flap joining the thighs with the calves; N: a red-pigmented lentiform structure in place of normal human genitalia; O: anus (cloaca?).
_____
Although some people may take lurid interest in gazing at pictures of deformed infants such as those shown on this page, this article was written for a different reason, that being to record information that will assist scientists in answering a single question: How different can two animals be if they are to produce a hybrid together? Of course, this question cannot be answered by simply reading this page. After all, the creature discussed here may not even be a hybrid (though genetic tests of the specimen would probably be able to resolve that issue). But the information documented here will help anyone who wishes to investigate the matter further.

In 1735, the German physician Gottlieb Friderici (1693-1742) attended the delivery of an infant in the small town of Taucha, a few kilometers northeast of Leipzig. His patient, 28-year-old Johanna Sophia Schmied, had previously given birth to three normal boys, and Friderici anticipated nothing unusual.

“But then,” he writes,

from this fourth pregnancy she brought forth this dreadful monster, which I propose to describe. [Translated by E. M. McCarthy. Original Latin: “Tandem quarta vice gravida, horrendum hoc, quod describendum iam mihi proposui, in lucem edidit monstrum.”]

Friderici’s “dreadful monster,” stillborn that day after an eight-month gestation, was indeed peculiar, so peculiar that he took the trouble to write up a detailed anatomical account, entitled Monstrum humanum rarissimum (i.e., An Exceedingly Rare Human Monster), which he published two years later (Friderici 1737). He also immediately hired an artist to prepare engravings of this strange birth, now known as the Hühnermensch (“chicken-human”). The resulting illustrations, reproduced here, accompanied Friderici’s account.

This remarkable specimen has been preserved in the collection of the Heimatmuseum und Naturalienkabinett Waldenburg, a museum in Saxony, and is therefore available for genetic testing. Either by coincidence or by heredity, it does seem to have enough characteristics in common with chickens to earn its name. Friderici repeatedly commented on the ostensible connection this babe makes between Class Mammalia and Class Aves. For example, during the course of his anatomical description, he says,

The upper extremities are not unlike those of a plucked chicken … and the digits, while normal in order and number, have claws exactly like those of a chicken. [Translated by E. M. McCarthy. Original Latin: “Extremitates superiores significat, brachia scilicet alis gallinarum, plumis privatarum, non absimilia. Cubito annexae manus oculis se exponunt, digitis quidem, si rationem numeri et ordinis habeas, legitimis, unguibus autem pullorum ungulis plane similibus.”]

“The deformed feet,” he says,
which are in an abnormal position and attached to chicken-like shanks, are, with the exception of their soles, of a wholly unwonted form, with the toes marvelously distorted and tipped with claws that are likewise exactly those of a domestic chicken. [Translated by E. M. McCarthy. Original Latin: “adjectos trunco pedes monstrat, utpote qui, inusitatum plane situm obtinentes, cum gallinarum cruribus aliqua ex parte convenire videntur, si a plantis pedum discesseris, quae ab humanis quidem non diversae sunt, at digiti tamen mire distorti apparent, ac ungues itidem pullorum gallinaceorum unguas referunt.”]

As do chickens, this literal Wunderkind has eye rings (periophthalmic rings) and a comb-like structure atop its head, both composed of red tissue, as in chickens. In addition, as in all birds, the ears are represented by only a small opening with no raised, external ears (pinnae), which are present in all mammals other than monotremes. Also as in birds, external genitalia are absent and the testes are internal.

It can also be seen in the illustrations that the skin is loosely attached to the underlying tissues, so loosely that it forms webbing at various regions of flexure (neck, elbow, knee, crotch). The skin of a bird, too, is more elastic and more loosely attached to the body than is that of the typical mammal, which is generally interpreted as giving birds the freedom of movement needed for flight (Stettenheim 2000).

_____
Gottlieb Friderici was born in 1693 in the village of Taucha in Saxony (the same community where he later delivered the Hühnermensch). He completed his dissertation at the University of Leipzig around 1713 and became a doctor of philosophy and medicine. He was thereafter a general practitioner in Leipzig up to the time of his death in 1742. (Biographical details from Huppmann 2006.)
_____

The heart, too, was larger than that of an ordinary human infant. And, according to a Kentucky University webpage on the avian circulatory system,
Birds tend to have larger hearts than mammals (relative to body size and mass). The relatively large hearts of birds may be necessary to meet the high metabolic demands of flight. Among birds, smaller birds have relatively larger hearts (again relative to body mass) than larger birds. Hummingbirds have the largest hearts (relative to body mass) of all birds, probably because hovering takes so much energy.

During the necropsy, Friderici found that the comb-like structure atop the head actually contained brain tissue, a situation reminiscent of that described by Purohit et al. (1977), who note that many hybrids produced by crossing pheasants with chickens are exencephalic (i.e., the brain is located outside the skull).

_____
Kleeblattschädel
Among the anomalies exhibited by the Hühnermensch is a syndrome known as kleeblattschädel, a congenital anomaly in which there is intrauterine synostosis of multiple or all cranial sutures. This is another avian characteristic of the specimen, because in birds the cranial sutures also fuse at a very early stage of development (Brown 1915, p. 72).
_____

If the Hühnermensch actually is a bird-mammal hybrid, then at this distance in time, one can only speculate about what might have happened back in Taucha all those many years ago. Did a rooster wander into a rustic bedroom and sit for a time on the lap of his naked mistress? Perhaps Johanna Sophia Schmied was a member of a coven that engaged in dark orgiastic rites that resulted in a weird creature seeing the light of day? Or possibly one day while gathering eggs she had her hands full and placed some rooster-semen-coated eggs in her underpants to carry them back to the house? Whatever happened, it seems the Hühnermensch took flight from there.

_____
Why would such hybrids occasionally occur? In certain distant crosses only a small percentage of inseminations result in a viable hybrid. This fact has been experimentally verified in crosses of commercial interest, such as chicken × turkey, a cross in which about 1000 inseminations are required to produce a single adult hybrid. The vast majority of hybrids from such crosses die at various stages of development before reaching maturity. Among mammals, such distant hybrids often abort or are stillborn. Among birds, they usually die in the egg. But some, very few, survive. Even from the present, extremely distant cross (human × chicken), viable mature hybrids have been reported (however dubiously). So it seems that it is not that distant hybrids are entirely impossible, but rather that they do occur, but with hybrids that reach advanced stages of development being produced at only at very low frequencies. One can speculate that this experimental observation may reflect the existence of an unrecognized underlying rescue mechanism that activates/deactivates portions of the hybrid genome at random, so that different individuals have different developmental programs, a mechanism actuated, perhaps, via random heterochromatization of various portions of the composite genome.
_____

Some very strange pairings can result from imprinting. When a newborn mammal or bird is exposed to some animal not of its own kind it may “imprint” on that animal, that is, later in life it may seek mates of that kind rather than its own, as a sexual partners. In connection with the present case, Hess (1959) reports that he imprinted a rooster on human beings by exposing him only to humans during the first month of life and keeping him strictly away from other chickens. As an adult, the rooster sought only human mates even when allowed access to hens. So one can think of various scenarios based on this knowledge: an accidentally imprinted rooster, an intoxicated or unconscious woman, and a very unusual mating.

At any rate, this specimen is a very interesting one and, given that it would no doubt be an F1 hybrid (if it is a hybrid at all), it would be very easy to detect its origins with genetic testing. One quick and easy method would be PCR amplification using human and chicken primers. As Cicero once said (De Officiis, I, 6),

We must not treat the unknown as known and too readily accept it. And he who wishes to avoid this error (as all should do) will devote both time and attention to the weighing of evidence.

Tommy Clayton #fundie gty.org

Nearly fifty years ago, the British agnostic Bertrand Russell penned these words: “There is one very serious defect to my mind in Christ’s moral character, and that is that He believed in hell. I do not myself feel that any person who is really profoundly humane can believe in everlasting punishment” (Bertrand Russell, Why I Am Not a Christian).

Philosopher John Hick echoed those sentiments when he called hell “a perversion of the Christian gospel.” He believed the doctrine of hell attributed to God “an unappeasable vindictiveness and insatiable cruelty.”

We expect statements like that from fallen, unregenerate minds. But what do we do when we hear similar things from prominent, professing evangelical writers? “How can Christians possibly project a deity of such cruelty and vindictiveness whose ways include inflicting everlasting torture upon his creatures, however sinful they may have been? Surely a God who would do such a thing is more nearly like Satan than like God . . .” (Clark H. Pinnock, “The Destruction of the Finally Impenitent”).

It’s become popular today for professing evangelicals to join the ranks of Pinnock, atheists, and agnostics in protesting the doctrine of hell. They are preaching sermons, writing articles, and publishing books, and some are wandering into the comment threads of Christian blogs. Here’s a small sampling from Grace To You’s blog in our recent series on hell:

“What kind of God torments people for all eternity?”
“. . . Satan loves the false doctrine of eternal torment”
“[eternal torment is] cruel and unusual punishment”
“[eternal torment] makes God out to be a cruel tyrant,” “absolutely cruel and malevolent”
“How can you in your right minds even consider this to be justice?”
If the doctrine of hell as eternal, conscious torment hadn’t been the position of the Christian church for two millennia, it might be easy to think we’re seriously out of step—a bunch of mindless minions who worship a monster-god! But when you examine the biblical evidence, without an agenda, you’ll find we sound a lot like Jesus and the apostles.

So, how could someone who claims to be faithful to Scripture ridicule the idea of eternal punishment? What is at the heart of their rejection of a never-ending hell? It’s simple, really—they minimize the seriousness of human sin and guilt, and they distort the perfection of divine justice. That’s the crime of Protestant Liberalism and every false religion.

Minimizing the Sinfulness of Sin

To one degree or another, we’re all guilty of minimizing sin. I remember the first time I read the account of Lot’s wife. God turned her into a pillar of salt as she was leaving Sodom. Her crime? A backward glance (Genesis 19:26). Reading that story as an unbeliever provoked me to ask the question: “Was that really an offense worthy of death—turning your neck to take one final look at your home?” As I explored more of the Bible, other accounts of God’s judgment appeared equally capricious and severe to me.

Nadab and Abihu deviated from the priestly procedures. God consumed them with fire (Leviticus 10:1-2).
One man gathered wood on the Sabbath. God commanded Moses to stone him (Numbers 15:35).
Achan took a few forbidden items from the spoils of Jericho. God commanded Joshua to stone and then burn Achan along with his entire family (Joshua 7:24-25).
Uzzah kept the ark of God from falling into the mud by reaching out his hand and taking hold of it. God immediately struck him dead (2 Samuel 6:6-7).
Ananias and Sapphira lied to the apostles. God killed them both in front of the entire church. (Acts 5:1-10).
We often struggle to understand how something seemingly so trivial could enact such a severe judgment. Our flesh wants to cry out in protest, “That’s not fair!” But responses like that reveal our failure to grasp the depth of sin. We see only actions—a devoted father gathering firewood to keep his family warm; a zealous Israelite anxious to keep the Ark of God off the ground—but God sees things differently, more clearly, than we do. He sees our sin as insurrection, rebellion against His holiness (Exodus 31:14; Numbers 4:15). What’s more, He sees the hidden motives and intentions at the core of our actions (Matthew 5:28; Hebrews 4:12).

One of the most basic tenets of justice is that the punishment must fit the crime. So, if the ultimate punishment for those who die without Christ is hell, then what is the crime? What do men do to merit the eternal sentence of hell? Put plainly, they sin.

You may think that’s a small thing, but the way John MacArthur explains sin, it puts it in its proper perspective. Essentially, sin is “an act of treason against the Sovereign lawgiver and judge of the universe.” The Bible describes our sin as “rebellion,” “ungodliness,” “lawlessness,” “wickedness,” and an “abomination” (Leviticus 26:27; Isaiah 32:6; 1 John 3:4; Ezekiel 18:27; Proverbs 15:9). Sinners then, are traitors, refusing to love, thank, serve, and obey the God who gave them life, breath, and every good thing.

Sinners spurn God’s love, despise His sovereignty, mock His justice, and view His commands with contempt. They are thieves and murderers, stealing God’s glory and assaulting His holiness. In fact, as Martin Luther once remarked, if sinners had their way, they would dethrone and murder God, which is exactly what they did at Calvary (Acts 2:23). Viewed through the lens of Scripture, sin appears exceedingly sinful (Romans 7:13).

I find it ironic that those who protest the idea of eternal, conscious torment deride the doctrine with words like, “cruel,” “morally revolting,” “monstrous,” and “repugnant.” Why don’t they employ the same terms of outrage to describe sin? Simple: they fail to see as God sees. God finds our sin “cruel,” “morally revolting,” “monstrous,” and “repugnant,” and He’s absolutely right. If we can’t see our sin as God sees it, it stands to reason that we don’t see the just judgment of hell like He sees it either. We’re just going to have to trust Him.

Divine Justice

People who reject the doctrine of eternal hell also stumble over the justice of God. It seems unjust of God to cast someone into a lake of eternal fire for thirty years of sin. Is sin really that bad?

Yes, it is. In fact, you readily accept that there are escalating levels in the seriousness of offenses. For example, if you punch your neighbor, he may punch you back, slash your tires, or even report you to the police. If you assault your boss, he’ll fire you. If you strike a policeman, you’re in danger of getting tased, pepper-sprayed (or worse), and you’re definitely going to jail. Take it up a notch: if you even attempt to assault the President of the United States, you’re going to prison for a long, long time. And if you try those shenanigans with any other head of state, you’ll probably be executed.

Clearly, we live by an established principle—the seriousness of a crime is measured not only by its inherent nature, but also by the one offended. Furthermore, we readily accept the escalation of punishment, based on the status and position of the one offended. If that makes sense on a human level, why are we tempted to ignore the status and position of God? If we live by that principle on a horizontal level, why not on a vertical level?

Our sins have offended an infinitely glorious and holy Being, and punishment must correspond to that offense. God will by no means acquit the wicked (Exodus 34:6-7). He will give the unbeliever exactly what he deserves. Isaiah said “Woe to the wicked! It will go badly with him, for what he deserves will be done to him” (Isaiah 3:11). God warned the children of Israel: “If you do not obey Me, but act with hostility against Me, then I will act with wrathful hostility against you, and I, even I, will punish you seven times for your sins” (Leviticus 26:27-28).

The righteous Judge of all the earth will one day rise up and call every creature into account (Genesis 18:25; Hebrews 9:27; 1 Peter 4:5). He will open the books and mete out a just sentence for every sinful thought, word, and deed (Romans 2:5; Revelation 20:13).

We’ve all assaulted God (Romans 3:23), and we all deserve hell. Reject Christ, and hell is exactly what you’ll get. God will rise up in judgment and cast all unbelievers into the lake of fire (Revelation 20:14), and all creation will praise His justice. To accuse God of injustice for sentencing sinners to hell is the height of arrogance and audacity.

Yes, God’s judgment is unbearable, but it is never unjust (Genesis 4:13). And that is why “it is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God” (Hebrews 10:31).

David J. Stewart #fundie jesus-is-savior.com

There has been much talk in the news recently about a famous Penn State college football coach who has been accused of sexually abusing several young boys. The coach has maintained his innocence, but admits to foolishly showering NAKED with several young boys. This case alone shows what's wrong with public nakedness. One thing often leads to another and public nudity is asking for trouble. Americans are deceived to think that males and females can walk around immodestly dressed without consequences.

The Bible teaches that it's best to stay as far away from sin as possible, which is why Jesus equated lust with adultery (Matthew 5:28). James 1:14-16 plainly teach what is wrong with public nakedness, for it is the root cause of sexual immorality...

James 1:14-16, “But every man is tempted, when he is drawn away of his own lust, and enticed. Then when lust hath conceived, it bringeth forth sin: and sin, when it is finished, bringeth forth death. Do not err, my beloved brethren.”

It all begins with lust. If you aren't in the presence of other naked people, then you cannot be drawn away by lust. it's not rocket-science!

It is unscriptural for men to shower naked around other men, let alone in the presence of young boys. This Scripture passage makes this clear. It is not good for men to see each other naked, as evidenced by the pederast homosexual problem. The Romans were infamous for pederasts (men having sex with boys). Socrates, the famous Greek philosopher, was a pederast homosexual.

There is nothing manly about men disrespecting one another by walking around naked in the shower room. It is proper and right for men to show respect for the body, and toward their fellow mankind, by clothing the body. It is more than coincidence that initiates into Luciferian occult groups are required to perform acts of homosexuality as part of their initiation rights. The purpose for this is to debase each other, removing all bastions of decency and reservation between one another. In all sexual relations, even if with a prostitute for a few minutes, a soul-tie is formed between the two people (whether male or female) involved in the act. This is one of the spiritual dangers of sexual immorality, which undermines one's entire soul's health. Proverb 6:32, “But whoso committeth adultery with a woman lacketh understanding: he that doeth it destroyeth his own soul.”

I heard an internet radio commercial today advertising the product, “AGELESS MALE,” guaranteed to boost testosterone for men by 61%. Then the advertiser said, “Get back in the game!” That's not why I wrote this article, but the timing was perfect for this article, because it evidences the sinful and irresponsible attitude of society today toward sexual relations. Get back in the game??? Sadly, sex is a game to many people!!! This is the horrible consequence of America's sexually-indecent television programming, promiscuous sitcoms, perverted Late Night comedy shows and TV in general.

I don't watch TV because it is too evil. So when I do occasionally see a TV show on someone else's TV in a hotel or at a restaurant, I am absolutely shocked and angered by what I see and hear. If you watch TV all-the-time, you won't see just how evil it is, because you are sinking into the abyss of wickedness with the hellivision. I guarantee you that if you turn off your television for 6-months that you'll be absolutely shell-shocked when you turn it back on. I hate TV!

It is common practice in health clubs, YMCA's and locker-rooms across America for men to shower naked in the presence of other men, and to walk around naked and let it all hang out. It is uncouth, tasteless, lacking of respect for each other and unscriptural. The same is true of women's locker-rooms. Historically, sports and public nudity have always been synonymous. The Greeks were famous for sports and infamous for nudity.

Genesis 9:21-27 teach us several important life-changing and moral lessons. We see that alcoholic beverages are spiritually dangerous, linked to nakedness and sin. Noah sinned by getting drunk and led his son to sin by doing so. Don't think that Noah didn't think about that either. Noah had to live with the division created between him and his son because of booze. Alcohol brought shame upon Noah. Noah had to live from that day forward knowing that Ham saw him naked and drunk. Although Noah knew he was forgiven in Christ, he caused permanent division between he and his son, Ham.

We also see that Ham sinfully paraded his father's sins, instead of faithfully concealing the matter. America's history books, Wikipedia and newspapers are filled with what husbands and wives have hypocritically said about each other during and after a divorce. The next time you hear a woman talking about how evil her husband is ask her how she obtained perfection. The Bible warns against condemning anyone. James 4:12, “There is one lawgiver, who is able to save and to destroy: who art thou that judgest another?”

By the way, I hate Wikipedia. I've noticed that celebrity profiles (like George Clooney) are locked, but gospel preacher's profiles are open for every snake, rat and God-hating trash to slander and serve roast preacher. Wikipedia is a sewer of American society and Jimmy Wales will give account to God for helping spread malicious gossip. Wikipedia is a weapon. It's easy for some worm who never built a hot-dog stand to throw rocks at a faithful preacher who gave his life to others in the Lord for 50-years, helping literally millions of people in so many ways and changing a nation for God.

[...]

The Demon-Possessed Maniac of Gadarenes

Luke 8:27 and 35, “And when he went forth to land, there met him out of the city a certain man, which had devils long time, and ware no clothes, neither abode in any house, but in the tombs... Then they went out to see what was done; and came to Jesus, and found the man, out of whom the devils were departed, sitting at the feet of Jesus, clothed, and in his right mind: and they were afraid.”

What a precious passage of Scripture! This afflicted man was possessed by devils, running around naked and living in the wild. The entire city knew he was insane. Yet the Bible says when he found Jesus, he came into his right mind and put his clothes back on. Amen! Jesus is the cure for insanity and nudity.

Millions of Americans go to psychologists, psychiatrists and religious leaders for help; but the Word of God says the afflicted man at Gadarenes came into his RIGHT MIND when he found Jesus. It is interesting that being in one's “right mind” is associated with being properly clothed. Americans have a problem keeping their clothes on because they AREN'T in their right minds, they are mentally-ill. This is clearly evidenced by the fact that nearly half of the women in America have murdered a child by abortion. Only a mentally-ill person would deliberately kill a precious child. So it doesn't surprise me in a rotten society that devours it's own children that they would also have a problem with nudity.

The Cure for Nudity is Jesus!

Women who love and respect the Lord won't wear bikinis at the beach, or wear miniskirts, or wear pants, or pose in Playboy. There's not an honest normal man alive who doesn't know what's wrong with women wearing pants—they are extremely revealing of a woman's flesh.

We are living in evil times, when unrepentant sinners are trying to justify every sin imaginable with the Bible. I heard a woman on the news, a professional pornographic model, claim that God approved of her vile career. She said that God created Adam and Eve naked, so nudity must be ok. Evidently she's never read Genesis 3:7 or 1st Timothy 2:9.

Here's a Scripture for all you women who keep trying to justify your nudity and immodest clothing ... “Ye have wearied the LORD with your words. Yet ye say, Wherein have we wearied him? When ye say, Every one that doeth evil is good in the sight of the LORD, and he delighteth in them; or, Where is the God of judgment?” (Malachi 2:17). Beyonce Knowles claims to be a devout Christian; yet says she has permission from God to wear sexy clothes and strip on stage. She is woefully wrong! Beyonce needs to see Jesus.

God knows what we watch on TV. It's just as bad to watch adultery on TV as it would be for us to be in same room with them. The TV has a desensitizing effect on its viewers. Sin is not shocking anymore but rather becomes commonplace (no big deal). This is why many people have become lackadaisical and acceptant of the wicked sin of homosexuality. The following reads like a synopsis of hellivision and unholy-wood:

Romans 1:28-32 -"And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient; Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers, Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful:"

Andrew Anglin #sexist #racist dailystormer.name

[From "Icelandic Women are Filthy Whores: Five Fast Facts You Need to Know"]

Each time we’ve gone live on the clearnet, I’ve given a story of the crazy and often psychologically painful things I’ve had to do to get the domain. I became a Russian 1337 haxxor. I married an Arabian call center princess. I dropped a verse on a Gucci Mane album.

This time though, it was a whole other story. To get the Icelandic TLD, the male population requested I come to the country to teach them how to deal with their women, who they described to me as “a bunch of filthy fucking whores.” They had read many of my articles on feminism, and told me that if anyone could fix the problem of Icelandic women, it was me.

I’ve been here in Iceland ever since .at went down, researching the problem and trying to come up with solutions. Every time I think I’m close to a breakthrough, however, I hit another roadblock.

What I can say is that in my time here, I’ve learned a whole lot about the nature of Icelandic women.

If you’re a man and you’re planning to travel to Iceland for any reason, you can never truly be prepared for the feminist hell that is Iceland, but it’s better if you know what you’re getting into.

Here are five fast facts you need to know.

1.) Icelandic Women will Not Shut the Fuck Up

Before you see her bloated, puffed-up face, her flabby gut or her glazed-over eyes, or smell the rank gin on her breath, you’re going to hear the Icelandic whore’s motor mouth.

[...]

2.) Icelandic Women are Fat

The only time an Icelandic woman stops running her mouth is when she is stuffing it with cakes and fried schnitzel.

Icelandic women make American women look thin. Hell, Icelandic women make whales look thin. One theory as to how they got this fat is that their fathers, husbands and brothers just started stuffing them with food to get them to stop talking.

Another theory is that they are so self-absorbed, that they can’t even imagine another human being existing – let alone the idea that another human being has vision and would be turned off by their arm-flaps and turkey-gobbles.

The worst part of all is how they’re all constantly rattling on about how they’re “on a diet.”

3.) Icelandic Women Cannot Suck a Dick Correctly

The men here don’t tell me about how their women won’t stop talking or how fat they are, probably because Icelandic men are a bunch of primitive farm people who have never been in a country like Afghanistan where women know they’d better keep their

lips zipped or they’re gonna be drinking oatmeal through a straw.

No: Icelandic men complain that their women cannot properly perform blowjobs. They say to me “I read in the magazine, the sucking is to bring joy, Mr. Andrew, but when my gf goes for the suck, I am lucky if I’m bored.”

Men here tell dark and harrowing tales of biting as well of Icelandic women drunkenly falling asleep mid-suck and locking their jaws. One man I spoke to had to have surgery.

However, the larger whole of women here outright refuse to suck dick at all, suffering from what is clinically known as “suck refusal” – a condition under which a feminist refuses to suck on dicks because she “doesn’t feel like it” or worse “thinks it’s degrading.” I have also heard stories of women texting during bjs.

4.) Icelandic Women Age Terribly Due to Smoking, Alcoholism and Drug Addiction

Even if you do find an Icelandic woman who isn’t a whale, she is still going to look 62 by the time she’s 26. This is because Icelandic feminist culture is utterly depraved, and involves absurd levels of smoking, drinking and shooting, snorting or smoking drugs.

[...]

5.) Icelandic Women Fuck Nigger

Most people do not actually know that “Iceland” is a country, and in fact think it is a part of an expansion pack for World of Warcraft.

That is indeed what I thought, until I was offered a domain there.

However, the few people who do know it is a real country know that it is famous because of a nigger with AIDS who fucked like 35% of the country’s entire female population.

[...]

Conclusion
Try to avoid Iceland, if at all possible.

The women are the worst in the world.

Furthermore, if you register a domain for a website in Iceland that some dumb bitch thinks is mean, they will call the police on you.

RegisterUserName #sexist incels.co

[OP of "[Discussion] SEAmaxxing is overrated, expensive, low quality and takes up a lot of time. What about other "extreme" measures to ascend?"]

Cold approaching is dead.
Online dating was stillborn.

It seems that, if you're white, the only way you can ascend is through going to Asia and fucking some noodlewhore who's desperate for a green card and you seem better than the average ricecel (not cool to cuck ricecels). But that isn't the case.

There are probably dozens of ideas that you've never thought of because, when you can't get what you want with mainstream methods, you have to think outside the box to solutions that have a greater chance of working. I'm talking joining a cult (more of an extreme religion where you can make up some mumbo jumbo that loosely correlates to what a crazy guy wrote to get some girl who also joined to marry you or face damnation, or whatever), entering a mental hospital, homeless people (not betabuxxing, but more of a "you're the first person to care for me; how could I repay you" and then they fall in love with you or something), mental hospitals, going to Alcoholics Anonymous or one of those circle meetings to find someone in a rough patch in life. Things like that is how there's ANY chance to ascend.

You can choose 3 options:

1. LDAR and be a virgin forever. There's nothing inherently wrong with this, and you can be happy if you have copes, but I desire something more out of life;

2. Half heatedly try to do things like "cold approach" and use Tinder, despite them being useless and you know it because you've seen the data yourself. It seems to be like a cope so that you can further reaffirm how over it is. You will not get laid on Tinder nor will you get anything more than a date (if you're fakecel and/or lucky), so why bother with that futile pursuit?

3. Do crazy shit. Step out of society and choose methods that might actually work, because we're not talking about massive sexual marketplaces; we're talking about unconventional shit that can't be quantified like online dating or approaches because they will be highly personal.

It's going to give you something to do and think about and, if you're lucky, you might actually ascend for real, not just a one night stand or whatever. You're probably thinking to yourself, "This seems like a massive scam to make me buy something because you haven't actually told me how to do it." And to that, I say "Eh?" Because I don't know yet either. So help me out.

These are some things I've thought of, just bullet pointed but I can go into detail if you want to talk about it. I'm not going to include SEA because it's already saturated with white guys who are better looking than you, and we want to be thinking properly outside the box, instead of trying to start a rap career with a name starting with "Lil" and expecting to be able to compete; we're going for that African clicking noise genre. Anyways, here are some ideas I can think of off the top of my head:

Alcoholics anonymous or similar meetings (25-40 preferable age range and the ladies will likely be like 20-35)

Cultmaxxing to make your own cult (requirements: must be Ritalincel; nah, but seriously, you have to be able to be very charismatic and preferably not a turbomanlet. Age range for incel would be 28+ I'd say and the girls could be anywhere from 16 (depending on age of consent; obviously don't break the law) to around 25 or so)

Cultmaxxing by leeching on someone else's cult and finding wife, but be careful that a fellow incel hasn't made it into a sex cult where he fucks your wife (doesn't really matter about age tbh, but this is a lot easier but obviously you don't have the power. Just be careful of the leader; he might be a day or something idk so maybe you could arrange not to report him if he made you archbishop or whatever lol)

Helping homeless girl (you gotta have your own house and stuff, preferably be able to fulfill a father like role because she probably had circumstances which led to her never having anyone to be a father) I think I like this one the most because she's not going to become a street whore or anything just to keep affording crack until she's raped and killed eventually; you're actually helping someone so it's the most morally acceptable and you are making a woman who's not a detriment on the system.

Uhhh I'm getting bored but DONT go after those "alternative" girls or whatever, because that's a normie thing and you will have competition. They are high SMV and likely already know that.

Mentalhospitalmaxxing and find some crazy bird

Fight girls' boyfriends and try to hit on them after. You see all those stories man you never know. (Works best if you're young, tall, good fighting success. You can snag teenage girls depending on laws in your area so from around 16-25 where they might just get turned on by it and are drunk and are angry at their boyfriends, but it probably won't be a long term thing ever because, I mean, come on, it's the type of girl to leave her boyfriend for an ugly subhuman because he got beat up)

Anyways, I want to know more ways like this because it might be the only way you can ascend.

Remember, don't do anything illegal because that's not cool! Well, it is, but it's going to maybe get you in prison where people might have ascension methods of their own involving your ass.

czakal #racist diversitymachtfrei.wordpress.com

Most European cinema is made with government subsidies. This makes it particularly pernicious since it is resistant to commercial imperatives. Fortunately, most European films are so bad no one wants to watch them. Hollywood is a different story. There the Jews are in control and have diabolically weaponised the art of story-telling against us. We can at least hope for a consumer revolt against them there since they’re operating in the private sector. Perhaps it’s wishful thinking, but in the last few years there may have been signs of goy rebellion as Alt Right consciousness spreads and Jews have jumped the shark by laying the propaganda on too thick.

It would help fan the flames of this goy revolt if we had an Alt Right equivalent of the IMDB where you could get a quick deconstruction of the propaganda content of the film before watching it. One reason Netflix shut down their review option, I suspect, was that white people had started pushing back there in the comments.

The reviews/analysis on the site wouldn’t need to be too in-depth. A quick take would often be enough.

For example, for “Star Wars: The Last Jedi”.

Jew producer Rem Bergman (Israeli). Reckless young white man rebel gets lots of people killed by evil, white-skinned imperial baddies. Purple-haired, feminist-type white woman takes charge and reprimands him. But she is clueless and doesn’t know what to do. A negro and fat Asian chick come up with a plan to save everyone. The negro is a coward but the Slope encourages him to man up. A young white chick goes to an old white guy to learn wisdom. He is weak, feckless; given up; thinks he is useless and doesn’t care anymore. She persuades him to try again. He teaches her stuff. In the end, the white chick, the negro and fat Asian bitch and a “diverse” crew of helpers confront the evil white imperials and defeat their plans.

Obviously, this would have to set up on a platform that was resistant to censorship, open to input from unknown outsiders, with some kind of approval process for entries to exclude infiltration by the Left. Sort of like the “far-right” Wikipedia equivalents.

Ultimately, a people defines its self-image through the stories it tells. By hijacking the apparatus of our collective dream manufacture, the Jews have been able to sap our spirit and warp our sense of right and wrong. An Alt Right IMDB would let us set up our very own Culture of Critique through which we could begin the process of deprogramming the Matrix.