Similar posts

Haight #racist stormfront.org

Re: Am I German, I mean German-American?

No, you're not German, you're not even Germanic, you're a Germano-Celt, mostly Celt. You said yourself you are only 12.5% or 1/8th German, so how does 1/8th mean "German" to you?
To be considered German you would need to be at least 50% by blood, and have immediate family in Germany, otherwise we may as well just call people what ever takes their fancy, and thus dive head first into the anything goes area of Cultural-Marxist ideology.

To be German isn't to be classed as the "best" of the best either, and if one is looking for the least compromised of the European races then it isn't the German, but the Scandinavian races that are the purest of Europeans.

If you want to identify with an old religion then it would be the Celtic version of the indigenous European religion as that is the majority in you. If you need a culture to identify with, again it is the Celtic that would be the best option, or the Germano-Celtic (a true ethnicity and culture in itself).

Now, who gives a sh!t...these tests are a waste of money. If you want to know your type then look in the mirror.

This is a good example of why I don't agree with European ethnicities breeding with each other, it creates confusion and a lack of identity in the children. Before you White Nationalists say "Oh, you're just causing division" why not apply your own standards of no race-mixing to your own people first rather than to the people who are irrelevant, the non Europeans.

s gre #racist wnd.com

The liberal's "golden" ***!!! The white man's
Frankenstein!! White Americans of all stripes, so beat-down, guilt-ridden, and psychologically scarred by America's history of slavery and the subsequent century of murderous brutal mostly southern Jim-Crow racism, rampant lynchings shootings burnings and raping, saw in this unknown "clean well-spoken" *** with the Hollywood grin an opportunity to once-for-all and forever rid themselves of national guilt, absolve themselves from any further racist culpability, and forever appease and muzzle the ever present civil rights race hustlers!!
So desperate was white America to wipe the slate clean and remove themselves from ever being called racist again, that they en-mass ran into the voting booths and, throwing away all sanity and connection with reality, blindly flung themselves at the African-mud encrusted feet of this fraudulent illegal-alien muslim marxist homosexual psychopath monstrosity!!! And yet even now, with horrified eyes wide open, realizing the hellish horrendous mistake they made, white America is STILL paralyzed by the fear of being called racist and of ***
rioting, and as such STILL cannot bring themselves to fully examine his pathological criminality, to fully identify him for the foreign enemy he truly is and deal with him accordingly! Instead, he CONTINUES to get away with his criminality! There is criticism without action, and even that criticism is often prefaced with I'm-not-a-racist pathetically timid self-effacing statements such as "I like him as a person", or "He's a good family man", or "I don't think he means bad", or, "I'm not going to accuse him"! And he laughs! He laughs as he allows American diplomats and soldiers to be slaughtered in Benghazi! He laughs as his tax payer funded muslim brethren overseas slaughter Christians with impunity! He laughs at you fools as he, instead of wiping your slate clean, wipes his Kenyan behind with your Constitution! He laughs ....as he wipes his Kenyan behind ...with YOU!!!!
As he rampages he laughs as he should! He is the monster! I blame YOU white America, you are his CREATOR...and you continue to feed him with your COWARDICE!!!

Chateau Heartiste #sexist heartiste.wordpress.com

Dating Market Value Test For Men

Here is a system for determining your dating market value if you are a man. Dating market value is a measurement of how you stack up against other men in the competition for attracting female interest. Be honest with yourself taking this survey. It will give you a fairly accurate assessment of the quality and number of women you are capable of attracting for a sexual relationship. Girls, you may take this quiz for your boyfriends to see if you are slumming it or about to be cheated on.

1. How old are you?

under 25 years old: 0 points
26-34 years old: +1 point
35-45 years old: 0 points
45+ years old: -1 point

2. How tall are you?

under 5’9?: -1 point
5’9? to 5’11”: 0 points
6' to 6’4?: +1 point
over 6’4?: 0 points

3. What is your BMI?

(Go here to calculate your BMI. I know BMI doesn’t account for very muscular physiques, but since most men are not Lee Haney, it is adequate for this survey’s purposes.)

under 20.0: -1 point
20.0 to 24.0: +1 point
24.1 to 27.0: 0 points
over 27.0: -1 point

4. How much do you bench press?

60% or less of your body weight: -1 point
61% to 80% of your body weight: 0 points
81% to 170% of your body weight: +1 point
over 170% of your body weight: 0 points

5. What does your hairline look like?

Full head of hair if you are over 35: +1 point
Full head of hair if you are under 35: 0 points
Receding hairline if you are over 35: 0 points
Receding hairline if you are under 35: -1 point
Bald (age irrelevant): -1 point
Bald but you are dark-skinned: 0 points

6. How much money do you make?

under $40K and you are out of college: -1 point
$40K to $70K out of college and under 40 years old: 0 points
over $70K out of college and under 40 years old: +1 point
under $40K and you are college age or younger: 0 points
$40K to $55K and over 40 years old: -1 point
$55K to $90K and over 40 years old: 0 points
over $90K and 40 to 55 years old: +1 point
over $200K (age irrelevant): +1 point

7. Do you have a car?

No (under 21yo): 0 points
No (over 21yo): -1 point
Yes (under 21yo): +1 point
Yes (over 21yo): 0 points
No, but you have a motorcycle (age irrelevant): +1 point

8. Are you good-looking?

(Self-assessment is somewhat unreliable, so if you are uncertain of your looks post your pic on hotornot and wait a week for your score. Or get opinions from unbiased and blunt friends. Hashing out the biometric details of what makes a male face attractive would require another lengthy post, so for now these two methods are acceptable substitutes.)

On a 1 – 10 scale:

0 – 4: -1 point
5 – 7: 0 points
8 – 10: +1 point

9. Have you ever played a leading role in a team sport?

No: 0 points
Yes: +1 point

10. What is your occupation?

(Since I won’t list every single high status job in the Department of Labor’s Occupational Handbook, you’ll have to make a judgment call on your own job. It’s a safe assumption that most people know a high status job when they see it.)

High status (doctor, lawyer, stockbroker, executive, professor, business owner, successful artist or musician or writer, professional athlete, etc.): +1 point
Neutral status (engineer, programmer, accountant, salesman, mid level manager, scientist, military officer, well-paid tradesman, etc.): 0 points
Low status (low paid blue collar, admin, construction, janitor, struggling web designer, help desk, etc.): -1 point

11. How many friends do you have?

0 to 3: -1 point
4 to 20: 0 points
over 20: +1 point

12. How many friends have you met through the internet that you have never seen in person?

0 to 2: 0 points
over 2: -1 point

13. When was the last time you went to a house party?

Within the past month: +1 point
Between one month and one year ago: 0 points
Over one year ago: -1 point

14. Have people besides your family called you funny?

None: -1 point
A few have: 0 points
Nearly everyone who knows me: +1 point

15. What is your IQ?

Under 85: -1 point
85 to 110: 0 points
110 to 130: +1 point
130 to 145: 0 points
over 145: -1 point

16. At a party, which happens first – you approach someone or someone approaches you?

I approach someone first almost every time: +1 point
I occasionally approach first: 0 points
Someone normally approaches me first: -1 point

17. Have you ever been in a serious fight where real punches were thrown and you felt like you wanted to kill your opponent(s)?

No: 0 points
Yes: +1 point
Yes, with a girl: -1 point

18. Have you ever been arrested?

No: 0 points
Yes: +1 point
Yes, for child pornography or public exposure: -1 point

****

It’s best to answer the following four questions based on your past experience with similar scenarios. Who we really are is not what we wish we were but what we have always been.

19. You are on a second date with a girl. You go to kiss her. She turns her cheek to you and says “Slow down, I’m not that kind of girl.” You reply:

(A) “Sorry.”
(B) “Yeah, well, no prob.”
(C) “This could be trouble ’cause I’m that kind of guy.” *smirk*

If you answered (A), subtract a point.
If (B), no points.
If (C), add a point.

20. You’re chatting up a pretty girl you just met in a bar. After a few minutes she asks you to buy her a drink. You reply:

(A) “Sure.”
(B) “I’m not an ATM.”
(C) “No, but you can buy me one.”

If you answered (A), subtract a point.
If (B), no points.
If (C), add a point.

21. You’ve just met a cute girl in a club and have been talking with her for five minutes when she abruptly changes the topic to a raunchy conversation about her multiorgasmic ability. You respond with:

(A) a huge grin and an eager “Damn! That is HOT!”
(B) a look of mild disdain.
(C) a raised eyebrow while saying “Hey, thanks for the medical report.”

If you answered (A), subtract a point.
If (B), no points.
If (C), add a point.

22. The pickup has been going well. Later in the night she leans in and begins making out with you passionately. You feel like a king and your jeans suddenly feel much tighter. Do you:

(A) immediately grope her boob in return.
(B) continue making out with her for as long as she wishes.
(C) kiss for a little bit then push her gently away and look distracted for a second.

If you answered (A), subtract a point.
If (B), no points.
If (C), add a point.

And finally, the critical thinking portion of the quiz. The following questions are based on the progression of a single pickup attempt.

23. You go to a bar. Twenty feet away are a pretty girl, a fat girl, and an average guy talking amongst themselves. The pretty girl briefly eye flirts with you. In reponse, you:

(A) eye flirt back and forth a few times before approaching 20 minutes later.
(B) immediately approach in a direct fashion maintaining strong eye contact with your target.
(C) immediately approach but from an indirect angle, looking around the room distractedly on the way over to your target as if you might see an even prettier girl somewhere else, and finally delivering your opener from over your shoulder.

(A): -1 point
(B): 0 points
(C): +1 point

24. Who do you address first?

(A) the pretty girl.
(B) the fat girl.
(C) everyone.

(A): -1 point
(B): 0 points
(C): +1 point

25. After getting the whole group engaged in conversation and having a good time, your target blurts out “Hey nice pink shirt! Are you gay?” You:

(A) say “No, I’m not gay!”
(B) ignore her.
(C) say “OK, who brought their little sister to the bar!”

(A): -1 point
(B): 0 points
(C): +1 point

26. In the middle of the conversation you have to pee. You say:

(A) “I have to go to the bathroom. I’ll be right back.”
(B) “Excuse me.”
(C) nothing. Just go.

(A): -1 point
(B): 0 points
(C): +1 point

27. You’ve managed to get her outside your front door. There is obvious sexual tension. You want to close this deal. You say:

(A) “So, um, ah, see you around.”
(B) “Why don’t you come inside?”
(C) “I’m thirsty. Are you thirsty? Let’s go inside and taste DC’s finest tap water. But you can only stay for a minute, I have to get up early.”

(A): -1 point
(B): 0 points
(C): +1 point

****

SCORES

There are 26 points to earn or lose based on the questions asked. The scoring breaks down as follows:

-26: Why are you still alive?
-25 to -20: You’re an omega. Celibacy has its charms.
-19 to -15: You actively repulse girls. Your kind will usher forth the sexbot revolution.
-14 to -10: You’re always getted foisted onto the warpigs.
-9 to 0: Lesser beta. You don’t immediately disgust girls; they just don’t notice you. With much painful effort you can redeem yourself.
1 to 9: Classic beta. You catch some girls’ eyes, usually the ones you don’t want. Try not to make fatty fucking a lifestyle.
10 to 14: A few attractive girls in the bar will be intrigued by your presence. But you need game to close the deal.
15 to 19: Congrats, you have crossed the alpha Rubicon. A lot of cute girls will be pleased when you hit on them. But you can still fuck up by being yourself.
20 to 25: You’re a natural. Many hot girls check you out and forgive your occasional pickup blunders. You always have a look of sexual satisfaction on your face.
26: Super Alpha. Booty sticks to you like bird shit on car roofs.

(Submitter's note: Compare and contrast Dating Market Value Test For Women)

Padraig Martin #racist identitydixie.com

[From ""Distinguishing Southern Nationalism"]

Over the last week or so, I have received criticism for my attacks on generic White Nationalism, the so-called Alt-Right and Nazi LARPers. Generally, these are attacks from weak keyboard kommandos and obese geriatric geldings, some of whom mistook the original intended target. Regardless, given the reaction, it seems I struck a nerve. Good!

The vast majority of those who threw threats in my direction could not bench press an AR-15. Some of those who took shots at the latest round of strategic posts are intellectually too soft to see past their myopic understanding of our current predicament. Bowl Patrol? If you cannot see that someone like Dylann Roof would have done more strategically for “White People” by not being a psychopath, actually engaging in positive networking and community fellowship, then you lack strategic clarity. You are inferior in every single way – mentally and morally. You are useless. Go back to whatever leader du jure of your movement is taking pictures of himself in his underwear.

If you are serious about doing something for your people, let’s take an honest look at the differences within the movement: Southern Nationalism vs Generic White Nationalism.

Identity Dixie is a Southern Nationalist content producer. That is who we are. Generally speaking, ours is a fraternal group that seeks to build a Nationalist consensus within the South. The goal is to intellectually and emotionally lay the ground work for an independent South. Some members of Identity Dixie are also members of other groups that have aligned goals, but at their core, Identity Dixie contributors work the Southern zeitgeist. We are not the guys on street corners or running around in the woods playing Rambo on the weekends. We are the guys who convince the normie Southerner that he has a better future in a Free South.

What Identity Dixie is not is a generic White Nationalist entity. We obviously do not hate White people, but not all White people are the same. The Whites who call themselves Anti-Fascists are not my White people. Nor for that matter are Boston Brahmins. I went to graduate school with Boston Brahmins, they hate you and me. Generic White is simply not a good enough distinction.

I will root for White people in other areas of the country to do well, but they are not my own. Not all Whites are made equal. The German-American descendants of the 48ers, who comprise the rank and file of both AntiFa and the Alt-Right, have very little in genetic common with me other than skin color. The only ideological difference between the two groups is their brand of genocidal collectivism (one being crusty anarcho-communism, with a simmering hatred for Heritage America, and the other some form of authoritarianism, as long as it’s pro-white). Otherwise, they are almost identical. Their general hatred of Christianity and their support for socialism are entirely foreign concepts to me.

One other key similarity between AntiFa and the Alt-Right is their assumption that they will save the United States. True Southern Nationalists have no interest at all in saving the Empire. The United States is dead. It is a stinking, rotting carcass. The smell of its decomposition is evident in the Affirmative Action company commander, with an 85 IQ, leading your Southern enlisted sons into battle. She graduated with a 4.0 GPA from West Point because her Marxist professors wanted to achieve a social justice objective. White people did that. More specifically, Northern Whites empowered this marginally literate officer. Had she gone to the Virginia Military Institute, her inferior self would have transferred to Richmond Community College before she completed Hell Week. Now, her Communist Chinese counterpart is laughing, confident that he can beat an army led by incompetents in a week. He is right.

You can thank Northern Whites for your modern country.

And before you give me a diatribe about the JQ, just stop. Whites founded America. Prior to its existence, it was a massive forest comprised of wild savages, hunting and enslaving one another. They were conquered by Europeans. Towns and cities were erected by Whites. Institutions were established by Whites. If we assume Whites are superior, how did they let everything get taken by a tribe of Khazar gypsies? Let’s face a cold hard fact: three percent of the population did not weasel their way into power. Heritage Americans got lazy and gave it away – the same as they did when they sent their manufacturing to China. Specifically, Northern Whites gave it away. If I want to be even more specific, a cabal of Boston Yankees and German 48ers from the Midwest and Pennsylvania gave away the country that Anglo-Saxons and Scots-Irish built.

Why in God’s name would I want to align myself with the same Whites who get an occasional generational itch to dismantle the South?

Northern Whites first dismantled the antebellum South, a White dominated society, through a mass invasion. Northern Whites literally raped, pillaged, and starved Southerners, compelling them to remain in a Union against their will. Then they not only freed the slaves, they empowered them in local positions of governance throughout Reconstruction. Suddenly, I am supposed to look past their history and find myself aligned with their descendants because we share the same skin color?

Less than one hundred years later, the grandparents of these same generic White Nationalists lamented segregation. They demanded that the 101st Airborne march into Arkansas and impose integrated schools. It was a Wisconsin White gunman, Arthur Bremer, descendant of a 48er, who shot segregationist, George Wallace. Northerners later fought to reduce his sentence and they succeeded.

If the apple does not fall far from the tree, why would I now suddenly align myself with the grandkids of Midwestern Marxists? No thank you. Rather, I will align myself with my father’s people, many of whom fought and died to protect the Anglo-Celtic society upon which the South is based.

The fact is, the Alt-Right is full of socialists. They were raised praising Sherman, Grant, and Eisenhower – men who destroyed the South. They love themselves some Lincoln. They have nothing in common with Southerners. They cannot be trusted. So what if some guy in Vermont or Pennsylvania flies a Confederate Battle Flag? How edgy, bruh! That may resonate with your fellow militant egalitarians who equate imagery with purpose. It simply tells me the guy has nice taste in flags.

At the end of the day, generic White Nationalism is a fool’s endeavor. It is bound to fail. Southern Nationalists know they will have to go it alone. The socialists who comprise the majority of the rank and file of White Nationalists want to revive an American corpse.

In sum, keep your generic White Nationalism. Keep your bowl patrol. Keep your pagan imagery. This is not about optics for me. This is not about some short term edgy phase in my life. The Southerners with whom I daily interact are the legacy of a multi-generational quest to establish their own country, predicated on hierarchical stratification, Anglo-Saxon norms, and Christian values. We may not be perfect, but at the end of the day, we are not LARPy pseudo-Nazis.

Good luck and enjoy your pool parties.

Truthmonger #fundie newsbusters.org

...I saw this episode - no one blew up in the Schaivo case of course - much to the MSM's dismay - so they made a "reality" it on TV (the only way they can ever get their way anymore). Of course the evil bomber turned out to be (suprise!) an evil pro-life Christian. MJB will be back here later promoting "how everyone knows" that all pro-lifers are really avid pipe bombers hell-bent on blowing up all ("truly decent") pro-choicers...

The bigger implication of the episode was that a pro-life clergyman cleverly orchestrated the bombing with diabolical mind-manipulation methods in order to gain media exposure...when is the last time we saw a positive pro-life character or conservative Christian on a major network televison program? The answer of course is never...they are all evil or mind-numbed robots in MSM la-la land...

The main ploy here here is to make the pro-lifers look like the killers - take the focus off of the REAL pro-choice killers. This is a common lib tactic I've noticed now as we also saw in New Orleans where racist libs tried to paint conservatives as the racists...

As I watch these programs week after week I increasingly wonder about these writers...their anti-Christian propaganda and agenda is now so transparent. They are so hate-filled, guilt-ridden, and bitter about their lives. They are such fear-mongers, such bigots...what truly pathetic lives they live...

Victor Davis Hanson #fundie pjmedia.com

The best way for liberals to advance their various causes would be to take a pledge to live the rather progressive lives that they advocate. Here are a modest Ten Commandments to lend them credibility in the eyes of the American people.

1. Climate Change. Perhaps the greatest carbon emission sin is jet travel. On an average London-to-New York flight each passenger emits well over 1 ton of C02 emissions, an indulgence that can nullify a year of recycling of other less-privileged Americans. All supporters of government-mandated reductions in fossil-fuel emissions could at least take the following pledge. “I will fly across the Atlantic no more than once every five years.” Private jet travel — the worst of the mortal carbon sins — of course would be banned, at least until we can transition into solar and wind aviation. Al Gore in the middle seat of Row 44, fighting to put his oversized carry-on into the overhead compartment, would be a symbolic act worth far more than all his heated and well-paid rhetoric.

2. Schools. Most liberals oppose charter schools, support teachers’ unions, and encourage generous immigration, legal and illegal. To further diversity in the schools, create easier integration, and to nullify the insidiousness of white privilege, each liberal should pledge, “I will put at least one of my children in an inner-city public school, or in a school where the white enrollment is in a minority.” What better way to acculturate a young elite to the new world around him? Could not the Obama children attend a D.C. public school?

3. Guns. Gun control is an iconic liberal issue, specifically limitations on handguns and concealed weapons. Too many guns in too many places supposedly encourage violent crime. Again, what better way to make a statement than by having all liberal celebrities, business people, and politicians take the following pledge: “I will pledge that no one in my security detail will ever carry a concealed firearm of any sort”? Surely the pope, of all people, did not need armed guards, with lethal concealed weapons, surrounding his pope-mobile?

4. Illegal Immigration. Liberals support the idea of unlimited immigration, legal or not. But the key for successful upward mobility for newly arrived immigrants, attested in nearly all studies, is integration and acculturation with American citizens. Therefore the following pledge seems ideal for any supporter of open borders: “I will socialize weekly with at least one illegal immigrant, whether inviting him to a sporting event, dinner, or recreational activity.” Were one upscale family to adopt an immigrant family from south of the border, the latter’s health care, legal, education, economic, and culture challenges might be alleviated. There are plenty of empty and mostly unused guest houses behind estates in Malibu and Santa Monica, and very few shelters for new arrivals: why not combine need and idleness — and help the helpless?

5. Sanctuary Cities. Most liberals support sanctuary cities and the idea of open borders, including the right of cities to nullify federal law. Why not pledge, “I will swear support for all American cities that choose to nullify any federal laws that they find oppressive and somehow contrary to the idea of America”? When a cattleman shoots a wolf, and a county sheriff guffaws and claims “that’s a federal problem, not mine,” then we will have come full circle to the sort of disasters that occur in San Francisco.

D.B.Edinger II #fundie forums.courier-journal.com

That's why the parents of children in Jefferson County Public schools will vote out the secular-progressives attemtping to indoctrinate our children in secular agendas...

It's a Culture War, and you s-p/ Christian Haters don't know what you're doing, poking a sleeping, and usually very tolerant, giant...

It's a private museum, not a New York State Islamic/Madras-style publicly funded school, you Christ-Haters...

You people are so intolerant (and guilt-ridden, imMostho...;) you would do anything to deny a Christian-oriented world view, which has ENABLED the scientific community the freedom to inquire(although you are really not promoting science as much as a social agenda based on the secular-progressive/secular-humanist propaganda)...

Yall owe your very existence to Christian Culture, and especially American, Judeo-Christian Culture.

Brother Nathanael Kapner #racist realjewnews.com

The JEW PUSH FOR PERVERSION will COME BACK on their Christ-Hating heads!

History has shown OVER AND OVER that JEWS with their WICKED PLANS do NOT get away with their GUILT-RIDDEN Agenda for long.

Jews are NOT victims. Jews BRING ON a backlash for good reason: Christ-Defying Wickedness.

A BACKLASH against the Jews (if History is any witness) WILL come and I dare say, the Jews DESERVE it.

And by the way, this wretched Jew HAG: Ruth Bader Ginsburg is headed STRAIGHT TO HELL.

Sardonically, I pity the demons who have to see Ginsburg's HIDEOUS face for eternity.

(NO, I am not in the habit of holding sympathy for devils. BUT, who could bear to look at this UGLY JEW HAG for more than 5 sconds?

And SURELY, Ginsburg's HIDEOUS FACE is a metaphor of the Jew-Ruin of our hapless Jew-ruled nation.

François #racist amren.com

Blacks who benefit from Affirmative Action do not need to be really intelligent to become lawyers or other well-paid professionnals. That's how such Blacks move up to the upper-middle class. But genetics working how they do, their children will have a low probability of being intelligent. That's how you get dumb upper-middle-class Blacks, in America!

Pastor Winthrop USA #fundie answers.yahoo.com

In these troubled economic times, many members of my congregation are struggling to find well-paid jobs: As their pastor, I do my best to help such as preparing them for interviews. However, I always insist that they discuss their past times and social activities at my church to gage the reaction of their future employer. If there is no interest in what they say, I tell them to suspect an Atheist. Thereupon, they should excuse themselves and leave the room immediately.

The same applies to acquiring the services of Atheists. If I suspect that my local barber is an Atheist, I prefer to let my hair grow long. If the pharmacist refuses to accept God, I prefer to remain sick.

So long as we fail to economically embargo the Atheists, how can we expect to beat their ideology at home and overseas?

Sir Francis Dashwood #fundie freerepublic.com

Moses wrote Genesis. This is why such people will jump up and down screaming when the Ten Commandments are displayed or the Creationist idea of monogamy from the book of Genesis is introduced. The latter (Genesis) also ruins the illogical and non-biological arguments of homosexual monogamy. In a secular sense, homosexuality is an idolatry of perversion. It is in no way an anatomical function of the human organism, but a phantasmagoric creation from within the mentally disturbed human mind, a social psychosis, naked and on full exhibitionist display. This is the whole crux (pun intended) of their attack on creationism - - they are really frustrated by Genesis, but cannot destroy the axiomatic state of procreant human biology, it does not fit their religious agenda. Homosexual monogamy advocates seek ceremonious sanctification of their anatomical perversions and esoteric absolution for their guilt-ridden, impoverished egos. Neither of those will satisfy their universal dissatisfaction with mortality or connect them to something eternal. With pantheons of fantasies as their medium of infinitization, they still have nothing in them of reality, any more than there is in the things that seem to stand before us in a dream. Homosexual deviancy is really a pagan practice (and a self-induced social psychosis) at war with the Judaic culture over what is written in the book of Genesis (1:27, 2:18). This is exactly what the National Socialists were at war with... so, when someone uses the term "Gaystapo," they might not realize how close to the truth they really are. (Also, consider their eugenic breeding programs.) Many will seek ceremonious sanctification and esoteric absolution in some type of marriage rite, but that still fails to give them a connection to the eternal in both a religious and temporal, procreant sense - - the union does not produce offspring. Dissatisfaction with inevitable mortality only feeds the impoverishment of the ego further. Homosexuals really hate human life; their whole desire is rooted in the destruction of it...

YoniFalic #racist mondoweiss.net

Shills like Khaled Abu Toameh are well-paid for saying and writing what hyper-wealthy racist Jews/Zios want to hear and read. I know because my wealthy evil Zio relatives are among those that compensate gentile shills for lying.

Christian Wilhelm von Dohm (11 December 1751 – 29 May 1820) is an early example of a non-Jew, who made an excellent income from wealthy Jews by praising Jews and by lying about Jewish practices.

Laura Wood #racist #conspiracy thinkinghousewife.com

[From "Epstein Was Unapologetic"]

ACCORDING TO The New York Times journalist who had the last extensive interview with Jeffrey Epstein, he did not view his sexual perversion as perversion. He was “unapologetic.”

‘He said criminalising sex with teenage girls was a cultural aberration and at times in history it was perfectly acceptable. He pointed out homosexuality had long been considered a crime and was still punishable by death in some parts of the world.’

This does not seem like the type of guilt-ridden person who would have committed suicide.

Perhaps he also did not view his actions as wrong because most of his victims, it appears, were not Jewish.

There’s an exalted term for this in Jewish parlance. It’s called shtupping the shiksa. What is rarely mentioned in the coverage of this story is that Epstein, whose death is highly suspicious, zeroed in on gentile girls for his own pleasure and for others (including non-Jews). The Hebrew slang for a Gentile woman, shiksa ( שיקסע), comes from the Hebrew term shekets ( שקץ), meaning “abomination.” Gentile women are Niddah, Shifchah, Goyya and Zonah (menstrual filth, slaves, heathen, whores.) [Sanhedrin, 812-82b]

Obviously many Jewish men do not see things that way, but this Talmudic mentality may run through not just the likes of Epstein and Harvey Weinstein, but the huge business in trafficking of gentile Russian and Eastern European women in Israel. Stories of the women brought to Israel under false pretenses sound very similar to the stories of the girls who were lured by Epstein with money and promises of fancy careers:

[...]

E. Michael Jones contends there is an element of revenge in the phenomenon of Jewish men taking advantage of Christian girls.(or girls from formerly Christian countries). He discussed the phenomenon while discussing the Russian Revolution:

It’s always the rationalization – whether it’s usury, whether it’s on Wall Street. Goldman Sachs shorting stocks that they just sold to somebody, the Greeks for example. Or whether it’s the Cheka torturing Russians – the Jews in the Cheka torturing Russians. It’s always this rationalization, ‘You people treated my people badly.’ It’s in Philip Roth, where he’s ‘shtupping the shiksa’ because he’s ‘getting back for the way they treated my grandfather in Russia. It’s this type of asocial behavior that creates this animosity. It is something that goes deep, this Jewish hatred of Russia.”

And Christianity.

Is Jewish sexual perversion which combines money and power à la Epstein and Weinstein, revenge or envy? Philip Roth described that phenomenon.

David J. Stewart #fundie soulwinning.info

My friend, do you believe that the earth is flat? Are you that gullible? If not, then why be so stupid to believe that God authored a dozen Bible versions? I've been in professed Christian's homes, who had a dozen Bible versions on their bookshelf. Their wicked pastors are to blame, who approve of such insanity, who search through multiple Bible versions to prepare their sermonettes! I say “wicked” because they have been warned. John 15:22, “If I had not come and spoken unto them, they had not had sin: but now they have no cloke for their sin.”

Kindly, the yuppie Baptist church down the street from me have been warned.

NOTE: A “yuppie” is a young person with a well-paid job and a fashionable lifestyle. We've got a bunch of religious yuppies today, spoiled brats coming out of Bible colleges like Bob Jones University and Moody Bible Institute. They are seeking religious employment, but care not for THE TRUTH. They wear nice clothes, keep close cliques of yuppie friends, and shun people like me who stand for THE TRUTH. They keep up with apostate mainstream evangelicalism, follow reprobates like John MacArthur, Ray Comfort, Pat Roberson, Rick Warren, Joel Osteen, Billy Graham and Ravi Zacharias. Brother, we are at war and need soldiers!!! (2nd Timothy 2:3-4).

THEY HAVE NO CLOAK FOR THEIR SIN!!! Bob Jones University have been warned. THEY HAVE NO CLOAK FOR THEIR SIN!!! John 15:22, “If I had not come and spoken unto them, they had not had sin: but now they have no cloke for their sin.” I believe God may have sent me to preach to them, as a testimony against them on Judgment Day. They have been reproved for using satanic Bible versions, which all teach Lordship Salvation! You have been reprimanded for embracing the corrupt Alexandrian manuscripts! You have been warned Bob Jones crowd!!!

Michael Hill #racist leagueofthesouth.com

When God foiled the building of the Tower of Babel on the plains of Shinar he did so in order that the people might be scattered into separate nations and no longer be one people with one language (Genesis 11:1-9). In the previous chapter, we are told that the sons of Noah–Shem, Ham, and Japheth–and their descendants would occupy specified parts of the earth. For example, we read in Genesis 10: 5 regarding the sons of Japheth: “By these were the isles of the Gentiles divided into their lands, everyone after his tongue, after their families, in their nations.” It is clear, then, that God intended men to live separately with their own languages, kith and kin, and nations. Therefore, nations (i.e. peoples) have a Biblical mandate to exist and thereby to protect their interests from those who would destroy them either by war or more subtle means.

Because of a resurgence of godless multiculturalism and universalism (the new Tower of Babel), white Western Christians are threatened with extinction as a separate and identifiable people because of their own weakness and lack of Biblical understanding about the God-ordained principles of nationhood. While all other “nations” (i.e. groups based on race and ethnicity and “blood and soil”) are encouraged to preserve themselves and their cultures, white Christians in the West (the descendants of Japheth) are told that we must give up everything we have in order to placate those different from ourselves and who bear some alleged grievance toward us (i.e. slavery, “racism,” hatred, etc.) Sadly, it is often “Christian” ministers who lead the charge toward multiculturalism, pluralism, and universalism in the name of God himself. But they are false teachers.

By the grace of God, the philosophies and institutions of Christian liberty are the creations of Western European whites. In this age of rabid “political correctness,” this salient truth is buried beneath the monumental lie that all men (and hence all cultures and civilizations) are “created equal.” But truth is a stubborn and resilient thing. And the truth is that for at least the past 400 years, Western Christian (i.e. European-American) civilization alone has enjoyed the fruits of ordered liberty and abundant material prosperity. Elsewhere in the world despotism has been the order of the day. However, let us not boast for the simple reason that God has ordained things thusly out of His eternal wisdom. The Western world’s blessings of the Gospel, liberty, and prosperity are just that, a blessing. In Acts 16: 6-9, Paul and Silas were headed for Asia to spread the Gospel, but the Holy Spirit forbade them to go into that region. Instead, the Spirit led them, by means of Paul’s dream, westward into Macedonia. Thus the Gospel was forbidden to Asia in that day. Conversely, it was God’s will that it be spread into Europe. Of this we cannot boast. Rather, we can only thank God that in His providence He saw fit to bless our ancestors with His word and all that flows from obedience to it.

Our white European-American ancestors had no trouble enunciating the obvious truth that Western Christian civilization was superior to all others. Moreover, they had no hesitation about defending it, as their God-given patrimony, against those who would denigrate or destroy it. Just a century ago, our civilization was still distinguished by a robustness and self-confidence born out of a realization of the natural superiority of the West and its ways. None but the most crack-brained utopians believed in social, political, economic, and cultural equality, nor did they believe in the equality of the races in intellect and accomplishment. Unfortunately, the present century has witnessed the old order turned upon its head.

Today, the descendants of those European-American whites behave as a shamed and defeated people. Not only do they refuse to proclaim the God-ordained superiority of their own civilization and its venerable institutions; they also refuse to defend the very ethnic and racial particularities that gave form and definition to that civilization. “White” has become a dirty word, and few whites can even use the term now without wincing and casting furtive glances to and fro. But to deny one’s identity in such a manner is to dishonor the God who made us what we are and who separated us from the other races for His own eternal purposes. While blacks, Hispanics, Asians, and other groups revel in their natural peculiarities, whites will not dare even admit that race is one of the primary factors that determine who we are and what we create on this earth. This is a simple and fundamental fact of God’s creation. We are who we are simply because He has commanded it.

Because Christian liberty has been the product of Western civilization, should the white stock of Europe and American disappear through racial amalgamation or outright genocide, then both liberty and civilization as we have come to know them will cease to exist. As whites have lost the will to defend their inheritance, there has been a corresponding increase in the willingness of the colored races to destroy Western Christian civilization and replace it with their own vision of the “good society.” That vision, or nightmare, as it were, will have no truck with the rule of law, equity, or fairness. It will be predicated on the “intimidation factor”–the employment of brute force by the strong against the weak. In short, it will be “payback time” for the alleged mistreatment that minorities-cum-majorities have suffered at the hands of the White Devils.

(..)

Again, it is a cold and hard fact that if white Christian European-Americans should lose control over the North American continent to non-white minorities, then it will cease to be the civilized place we have known for the past several hundred years. As blacks and other minorities (e.g. Hispanics in the American Southwest) have gained political control over towns and cities, the decline in the quality of life for whites has become precipitous. Whites have quietly deserted the very places their forefathers built rather than stay and be subjected to the crime and disorder that frequently comes with minority rule. Especially intolerable is the never-reported epidemic of black-on-white violent crime. Whites, then, do not leave because they are “racists” (whatever that means), but because they fear for their lives and property in an unfamiliar and inhospitable environment. They have become cultural outsiders.

What will happen when America is no longer a “white Christian nation?” The “Civil Rights” revolution of the 1950s and 1960s (the Second Reconstruction) was more about special privileges for blacks and other minorities than about “equality.” Moreover, guilt-ridden whites have acquiesced to a campaign of silence about the epidemic of black-on-white violent crime (the media’s dirty little secret that never gets reported). It is an open secret today that many black and Hispanic leaders are calling on their followers to “get even” with Whitey for perceived past injustices.

There are, however, some blacks who see the truth and are willing to speak it. One is syndicated columnist and George Mason University economist Walter Williams, who opined that the antebellum South was absolutely right to defend its largely Anglo-Celtic civilization from the machinations of Yankee Abolitionist meddlers. Then there is the late Elizabeth Wright, whose views undoubtedly shook liberal egalitarians to their very core. Wright noted, “I am not fooled by the ‘diversity’ folk into believing that the institutions of this society will be preserved and honored by those who happen to share my gene pool. . . . The multicultural ideologues . . . make it clear that they view these institutions with contempt. They are working for nothing less than total control. . . .”

Wright indeed pegged the multicultural egalitarians correctly. Raw power is their one and only end, and they will use any means necessary to obtain it. And when they do, white European-Americans will be their first target. Then we will understand what “equality” really means. Wright believed that “when these people [i.e. blacks and other minorities] come to power, their major aim will be to institute their ‘enlightenment’ policies in all quarters of society. . . . I have heard them refer to liberties such as freedom of speech as no more than . . . ‘jive ass claptrap’ . . .” She continued: “I predict that, once in power, they will actually create laws to impose interracial unions, in order to finally bring about the ‘raceless’ dream society. . . . He . . . who insists on union with his own kind will be dubbed an intractable racist and sent off for further re-education.”

It goes without saying that few whites today would have the intestinal fortitude to say what Elizabeth Wright said, and that is precisely the problem. Even in the benighted and “racist” South, most whites will no longer speak and act in their own interests. However, the situation in Dixie, as bad as it is (especially in the big cities, yuppie suburbs, and wimpy churches), is much better than elsewhere. If a spirited defense of white, Western, Christian civilization is to be mounted on these shores, it will be in the South among those of European descent who remember the glories of their past. As likely as not, the South will find it necessary to break away from a decrepit Union that has already succumbed to the poison of multiculturalism and then form a new polity dominated by the mores and institutions of our own civilization.

(..)

Wright’s clarion call was refreshing indeed. But it is white Southerners themselves who must muster the courage to act and act soon. Demographers predict that whites will be a minority in this country by 2040 (this is already true in California and several other States). If we are not willing to fight to preserve that glorious heritage bequeathed us by men of honor, genius, and principle, then we truly deserve the disinheritance that will befall us within the next half century. We are sowing the wind because of our inaction regarding immigration and multiculturalism. We will likely reap the whirlwind.

Scott Kuehl #racist amren.com

This woman is a psychotic who belongs in a lunatic asylum, as do millions of other guilt-ridden, masochistic, and self-hating white left-liberals. The nature of her insanity is one of degree as opposed to substance. But they control almost everything, and will soon control everything.

A "racist" is any white (since only whites can be "racist") who criticizes and/or tells the truth about the lies and delusions of white-hating Negro politicians, activists, demagogues/ and intellectuals/ pseudo-intellectuals, black criminality, especially black-on-white violence, average black intelligence, life in Haiti, the nations of sub-Saharan African, and black-majority U.S. cities, etc.; the criminality and violence of Mestizos and pure "indios" from Mexico and Central American, free-lance and gang-related, "Hispanic"/"Latino" culture, etc.; the nature of Islam and acts of Muslim terrorism, the epidemic of rapes and gang-rapes of women and girls in the UK and Western Europe, etc. "White supremacy," "racism," "nativism," "islamophobia," etc. are synonymous with honesty, realism, sanity, and the desire of whites to survive and not to dispossessed, persecuted, and worse.

The only way not to be vilified as a "racist" is to lie or be silent and, even then, you'll be vilified as a "racist" since all whites are "racists" no matter what they do or say.

GOLAZ #racist stormfront.org

I flashed the drive-by middle finger at disgusting sight of black man/white blonde girl couple

Yesterday afternoon, I drove on the busy street when I saw this apparent interracial couple, Negro man (almost coal black but shade of dark brown) and beautiful athletic-type blonde girl in her early 20's or late teens, stand there in the corner of the intersection hugging each other tightly, as if in "love", as a blatant display of affection. This happened right next to the famous university campus.

Upon this sight, I gave the middle finger directed at them from the side of the driver door, with Negro man looking at me in shock and dismay while still hugging the mudshark whore tight.

Miscegenation should be strictly banned, yet 1967 Loving v. Virginia U.S. Supreme Court 9-0 unanimous case ruling (Jewpedia entry) led to the rampant miscegenation we the White race have been forced to witness, to our disgust. Another dumb white girl lost to the dark races, maybe her idiot white ("politically correct" who cheerfully welcome dilution of the white racial bloodline) parents will be proud of mulatto children.

Here is another (similar sighting) anecdote, by me in a prior post, in the same area that happened in 2014. Be careful about giving the finger as witnessed by idiot white drivers and pedestrians who would be shocked at the sight that could lead to potential social and legal repercussions.

Even approximately 80% white majority Utah state is now mired in mud races dominating to covet the beauteous white men and women, yet the local statewide media and state/local government call the negro, latino, pacific islander, etc communities "underserved" and "underrepresented" as if the white people are supposed to care about these worthless subraces trying to invade white communities (Rose Park in west side of SLC, West Valley City and parts of Taylorsville [latter I formerly lived for 13 months, one of the worst times of my life] are formerly white majority, now hispanic/mestizo/negro infested as crime-rampant barrio and colonia) for "snivel rights" and parasite the white taxpayers (welfare among other problems that include corrupt white employers and "business leaders & politicians" who favor illegal aliens for cheap labor and for converting to Mormon cult).

I already have the bumper sticker as seen below, but I have not put it on the rear of my vehicle yet...because it could lead to damaging my reputation to cause me to lose jobs as denied employment and even leading to fights in confrontation with either guilt-ridden white idiots who support racemixing or Negro who wants to menace me while he has dumb mudshark girlfriends in his harem who object to my message to whine to the Negro beast to challenge me to a fight on the dare.

image

Mike King #sexist tomatobubble.com

Though modern libtards and Marxified millennials will no doubt gush over this "feel good" story; to a traditionalist with a healthy appreciation and respect for true womanhood, true motherhood, and healthy culture, there is so much bloody wrong with this pathetic comedy unfolding down in New Zealand.

Jacinda Ardern is a 37 year-old New Zealand feminist Globalist libtard who became Prime Minister in October, 2017. During her campaign, she attracted international media attention when she bitchily denounced the male interviewer who had asked whether she planned to have children and take maternity leave if elected. Ardern -- oblivious to the fact that she serves the public -- was applauded for defiantly telling the interviewer (and by extension, the public) that it was “totally unacceptable in 2017” for women in the workplace to have to answer such a question.

Arden joins Refrigerator Solberg of Norway, the Frumpy Frau of Germany and Mamma May of the UK as female leaders of libtarded nations. Well, at least she is much easier on the eyes than the other three rancid hags.

Now, just a few months later, Ms. Ardern, who is not married, has announced that she is expecting her first child, due in June. A bit of basic math confirms that she must have already been pregnant while running for Prime Ministerette. How very "modern" of her. But there's more. Her "partner" and "baby daddy," Clarke Gayford, has just announced that he will take leave from his job after the birth to become a stay-at-home dad. Still more modern comedy, straight from the article:

"She admitted that her family’s situation was unusual in some ways, saying that she had suffered “pretty bad” morning sickness during the first three months while forming a new government, and that she did not know “how the government cars would feel about having a baby seat in them.”

Ms. Ardern said she planned to work right up until she gives birth and would then take six weeks of parental leave. During that time, she said, the deputy prime minister, Winston Peters, will assume her duties.

After that, Ms. Ardern added, she planned to return to “full duties,” with Mr. Gayford traveling with her and their child as often as possible."

This drama is really a dream-come-true for the modern libtard. It's got everything -- a vomiting female Prime Minister who is an unwed mother, set to collect parental leave pay while the de-balled and dutiful "baby daddy" adapts to his "stay-at-home" subordinate role. We wonder, will the Prime Ministerette be breast-feeding or breast-pumping into little plastic bottles, as she rides in the back of her limo while she and baby-daddy are out and about on state visits? Oh what a horrible example of "family life" to set for the young women and men of New Zealand!

The new Prime Ministerette and P-whipped First Baby Daddy of New Zealand?

It is not out of disrespect for women, but rather, to the contrary, out of the highest respect for women that Sugar and I, er, "The Editorial Board" of The Anti-New York Times can only heap mockery upon this sordid spectacle. A woman's place -- especially for a new mother -- and her ultimate satisfaction in life is to be found in the "hearth and home," not the bloody, nasty, and intrinsically dishonest world of politics. We understand that that the modern debt-based capitalist-communist economy requires many miserable mothers to work because one income is often insufficient to carry a household. But that is certainly not the case with "baby daddy" here -- who is (soon-to-be "was") a well-paid host of a TV fishing show.

Indeed, British Queen Victoria -- though she naively allowed the despicable Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli (cough cough) to undermine the long term interests of the Empire -- was spot-on correct when she looked into the future and warned about feminism and women in politics:

"I am most anxious to enlist everyone who can speak or write to join in checking this mad, wicked folly of "Women's Rights", with all its attendant horrors, on which her poor feeble sex is bent, forgetting every sense of womanly feelings and propriety. Feminists ought to get a good whipping. Were woman to "unsex" themselves by claiming equality with men, they would become the most hateful, heathen and disgusting of beings and would surely perish without male protection. I love peace and quiet, I hate politics and turmoil. We women are not made for governing, and if we are good women, we must dislike these masculine occupations."

Tell it Queenie, tell it!

And yet, we doubt that even Queen Victoria could have foreseen this idiotic modern freak show that is still developing down in New Zealand, with similar situations throughout the western world.

YIKES!

A few of the "hateful, heathen and disgusting" finger-waving maniacs that Queen Victoria accurately foresaw: Killary Rotten Clinton, Senator Elizabeth "Pocahontas" Warren, Congresswoman Maxi-Pad Waters

Boobus Americanus 1: I read in the New York Times today that the Prime Minister of New Zealand is expecting a baby and will take maternity leave.

Boobus Americanus 2: That great. It sets a wonderful example of what is possible for our daughters.

Sugar: Boobuss, you pathetic little mangina! Thiss brazen little husssy needss to ressign, quit her left-wing politicss, marry the father and sstay home to raisse her litter -- like I did.

Editor: It's a shame that your ungrateful little kittens never call you.

Glenn Miller #racist whty.org

White women do what white men permit. This is now, and always has been, a fact of nature and history. Today, this fact is painfully obvious to everyone with good eyesight. Our women have become whores for the world, thanks to Jewish created "popular culture" and Jewish corrupted judges, and politicians, who over the decades, have thrown out all laws designed by our forefathers to insure racial survival and the White man's authority over his women, children, country, and destiny.

The phrase Women and minorities this, and Women and minorities that, are repeated by the media, causing many of our women to believe they have more in common with colored men than with their own.

The so-called Women's Rights Movement would never have come about without the Jews. The original movers of this anti-White conspiracy were Gloria Steinem, Belia Abzug, and Betty Freidan, all Jews. Gullible White women believe these Jews have their interests at heart, but in reality, these fanatical, Aryan-hating pied-piper bitches are working to further the Jewish agenda. Weaken the White man. Divide and conquer. Divide the White man from the White woman so there will be fewer of both in the future.

As a direct consequence of Jewish mind programming, and White male cowards, our women and girls by the tens of millions have wallowed naked with sub-humans. And millions have given birth to mixed-breed offspring in scenes too nauseating to imagine without puking. These unnatural offspring grow up identifying with their colored side and hating their White parents. Mother nature gets her sweet revenge.

The White man has become so confused, guilt-ridden, and cowardly, he either applauds this traitorous behavior of his women, or pretends he doesn't notice it.

The Jews-media keeps our youth in a constant state of heat. They satanically exploit nature's strong demand upon youth to procreate. And, those who deny the intense power of this demand have simply forgotten what it's like to be young. Catering to the lowest urges of man, the Jews bring out the very worse in human nature. And any family not insulted every ten minutes by Jew television has lost their sense of decency.

Nature screams procreate! And the Jews-media screams procreate with any two legged featherless creature, regardless of race, color, brain size, or nose width.

White men, not to be outdone by their women, bed down with colored women, accelerating even more rapidly their own racial demise. The reason one doesn't see more White men and Black women together in public is because Whitey fears the Black man. Asian women are safer. Asian men don't make a fuss when seeing their women on the arms of White men. A big Jewish-promoted fad now is mail-order brides. Thick catalogues filled with photos of young third-world women offering themselves in marriage are widely publicized throughout the western world. Plane loads of lonely, horny old white men arrive daily in India, the Philippines, and South East Asia to meet their mongrel brides-to-be. And the Jews wring their hands in giddiness and delight at the success of yet another scheme to exterminate the hated White Aryan Race and make fortunes in the process from their victims. The White man finances his own destruction.

Meanwhile Whitey Joe and Jill Six-pack smoke their dope and watch MTV or the Negroes playing ball on television, their minds void of thought not put there by the Jews.

Rod Dreher #racist theamericanconservative.com

I've been thinking that the US is in a May 1968 moment, but that’s probably too optimistic. A reader who is a prominent Washingtonian (he identified himself, and I verified it; I’m not using his name to protect him) wrote this morning to say that he and a number of people he know are leaving the city for good in the wake of this past week’s violence. He writes, and I quote with his permission:

I’m out. I’ve lived in this city most of my life, and I’ve loved it. But I’m not lying to myself any more. I can see where this is going. It’s obvious. I don’t want to be here for what happens next. The city has been taken over by extremists who worship conformity and violence. They don’t care how many people they hurt. This is a religious cult. All that matters to them is race theology.

A friend from my neighborhood just got screamed by a high school girl on his street. He’s known her since she was born. He likes her parents. They’ve never had a single problem. Now the girl has decided my friend isn’t sufficiently supportive of Black Lives Matter. So as he paused at a Stop sign this morning at the end of his block, she approached his window and yelled “F*ck you!” right in his face.

There’s a lot of that going on here. Among the many ironies: what they’re doing now is racist. It guarantees a resurgence of white racism, and of intentional segregation. Everyone who thinks about that knows it’s true. No one cares. It’s all so incredibly dark. I don’t want to be around it. I definitely don’t want my kids around it. I’m fleeing, and I’m never coming back.

This reader, who is white, lives in one of the nicer neighborhoods in the city. Thinking of that girl in his neighborhood, I thought of this from Live Not By Lies, about how the Russian Revolution advanced years before actual fighting broke out, when the parents of the privileged refused to stand up to their children:

Most of the revolutionaries came from the privileged classes. Their parents ought to have known that this new political faith their children preached would, if realized, mean the collapse of the social order. Still, they did not reject their children. Writes Slezkine, “The ‘students’ were almost always abetted at home while still in school and almost never damned when they became revolutionaries.” Perhaps the mothers and fathers didn’t want to alienate their sons and daughters. Perhaps they too, after the experience of the terrible famine and the incompetent state’s inability to care for the starving, had lost faith in the system.

It’s happening here now. Trump is our Nicholas II: too weak and indecisive and lacking in credibility to do a damn thing about it.

Meanwhile, I’m hearing that there are conservative Americans in the DC area who are talking about attempting to emigrate to one of the Visegrad countries (Hungary, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Poland). They see no hope anymore here. I am reminded of this piece from Mark Bollobas that I published in 2018. He is the UK-born son of two Hungarians who fled communism in the 1960s and took refuge in Britain. Now, as an adult who lived for a time in America, he has returned to his parents’ home city, Budapest, to raise his own family. He wrote then:

But as a graduate of a US university, I didn’t see the American dream at all. I didn’t see opportunity, I saw neglect. I saw a country which is still the Wild West, full of hucksters getting rich quick on one end of the spectrum, and hero entrepreneurs who did the same on the other. A country where the police are super paranoid and trigger-happy, where life meant nothing, and although everyone went to church in Memphis (buckle of the Bible belt), racism was everywhere. Fear was everywhere. Distrust was everywhere.

Why not settle in his home country, Britain? He had lived and worked in London, but knew that he would never be able to afford to live there. And this:
And culturally, the most important of all, the England of today is so far removed from the England of my youth that it feels like a different world. What makes England great is the nonchalant English attitude to everything. Stiff upper lip. Humor. The genuine lack-of-interest in what other people do, as long as they’re not interfering. The moral strength to play fair, be a good loser, etc.

But over the last few decades this has been eroded by non-English immigrants who have moved to the UK permanently and brought their culture with them, aggressively. Usually the children are far more aggressive than the parents who actually made the move. And the English let this happen, because that’s how they are. Now the politeness is gone.

I ran a bar in Finsbury Park. My schedule was the same. Open at noon, close at midnight. I would go to work at around 10am, and walk home around 2am. You have the same schedule, and you walk past people who share that schedule. In England, 20 years ago, if you did this for a few weeks you’d eventually strike up a conversation, or create a little bond. That couldn’t happen in Finsbury Park because it was full of Somalis, north Africans and others (Abu Hamza was a personal favorite, hawking his vitriolic sermons on CDs to anyone that passed).

They all hated me and looked at me with distrust and disgust. The women walked past in their veils, clothing that sends the message of “f-ck off, don’t dare look at me or talk to me.” I walked those streets for two years and made not one connection. Visitors have come, have brought their culture, and they stick to it (I loved whichever day it was when they say you have to slaughter a goat; blood literally ran in the streets). It is their identity. Meanwhile the beautiful, accepting element of being British is abused, its kind culture allowed Trojan horses of all sorts to settle in.

He continues:

My decision to move back here to Hungary — I say that even though I wasn’t born here — has been reinforced by this fact: Hungary understands that holding on to its cultural identity is essential to its existence as a society we can understand.

Culture changes over time, of course, but it normally does it slowly as we creep towards a more civilized future.
England doesn’t feel more civilized — quite the opposite. It feels more feral. And the UK has just accepted its fate.

The lack of an American culture means Hungarians don’t know what’s missing, because they never had it. But there is a gaping hole in America: something is obviously broken. America is collapsing on itself.

It’s been nine years since I moved back. I can’t count the number of days I’ve thought to myself, or told others, “It’s just great to be here.” It still is.

Read it all. Bollobas has ancestral roots there, though, and can speak the language. He didn’t grow up in Hungary, but culturally, he can relate to the place. If I were in government in one of the Visegrad countries, I would start working on a program to entice emigration from dissatisfied Americans who have something to contribute, in terms of human capital and financial capital, to my country. When I was in Budapest last fall in a group meeting with Viktor Orban, he told us that conservatives should always consider Budapest their home. I expect there will be no small number of Americans who can afford it, and who can work from anywhere online, who will want to know more.

Meanwhile, in Minneapolis, a white city council member is challenging the people of the city to put up with home invasions and break-ins for the sake of racial change:

If you are a comfortable white person asking to dismantle the police I invite you to reflect: are you willing to stick with it? Will you be calling in three months to ask about garage break-ins? Are you willing to dismantle white supremacy in all systems, including a new system?

She, and other members of the city council, say they are going to dismantle the police department. Not reform it — disband it. From an essay by a council member, writing in Time magazine:

We can reimagine what public safety means, what skills we recruit for, and what tools we do and do not need. We can play a role in combating the systems of white supremacy in public safety that the death of black and brown lives has laid bare. We can invest in cultural competency and mental health training, de-escalation and conflict resolution. We can send a city response that that is appropriate to each situation and makes it better. We can resolve confusion over a $20 grocery transaction without drawing a weapon or pulling out handcuffs.

If you are a Minneapolis home or business owner, the handwriting is on the wall.

Meanwhile, the scandal at The New York Times is turning into a watershed for American journalism:

As the controlling mobs of the NYT wield enormous political power via info warfare and thought control, no self-respecting conservative or GOP politician (or their staff) should cooperate in any way with *any* of their articles. Any who do should be shamed.

I expect a number of disgusted conservatives to follow suit. Everybody knows that the Times is a liberal paper, but this newsroom coup is turning it into an illiberal left-wing paper. This has been coming for a long time, in both journalism and academia. Some years ago, I published a comment by a conservative academic who said that he is the lone conservative in his department, but he feels safe under the leadership of the old-fashioned liberal who is department head. But when that Boomer generation retires, it’s over. The Millennials and Gen Zers behind them are Jacobins, he said.

The Jacobin generation is taking over the Times now. They will also be consolidating power within other media institutions, under the guise of racial justice. Anyone who is not willing to swear allegiance to the Social Justice left has no future. Do you want to spend your career propagandizing? Similarly with academia: how many ideological re-education programs can you tolerate? How much ideological poisoning of scholarship and teaching are you prepared to submit to? It’s coming.

How many lies are you willing to tell, or assent to, to participate in this rotten system?

What sacrifices are you prepared to make to live in truth, and not by lies?

A lawyer reader told me this morning that the Benedict Option may soon be the Benedict Imperative. I asked him to explain. He responded:

There is a plausible (though not inevitable) scenario where we get a legal and cultural regime that fully adopts critical race theory, the obliteration of any stable definition of the family (this is already happening in the courts everywhere), and that does what it already says it believes to dissenters from the ascendant sexual ethic. All of these things operating at even 30% of capacity (and backed up by a privately imposed social credit like system), would make life increasingly difficult for those who won’t give a pinch of incense to Caesar on these things. Under this scenarios, the small-o orthodox Church and its members would get much smaller and poorer, and BenOp would lose the “option” part, as it would be the only plausible path forward.

I do believe this is coming, which is why I wrote The Benedict Option, and Live Not By Lies. We are rapidly moving to a new political order, a new media order, and a new social order. The story I started this post with — of the prominent Washingtonian leaving the city for good — is a symbol of what Alasdair MacIntyre talks about here:

A crucial turning point in that earlier history occurred when men and women of good will turned aside from the task of shoring up the Roman imperium and ceased to identify the continuation of civility and moral community with the maintenance of that imperium. What they set themselves to achieve instead…was the construction of new forms of community within which the moral life could be sustained so that both morality and civility might survive the coming ages of barbarism and darkness.

The imperium is crumbling. What replaces it will be worse, no doubt, but the conditions that made the imperium sustainable no longer obtain.

What does it look like to you, from where you sit this afternoon? What is the future for you and your family?

Adam Hobbes #fundie reaxxion.com

“The uncontested absurdities of today are the accepted slogans of tomorrow. They come to be accepted by degrees, by precedent, by implication, by erosion, by default, by dint of constant pressure on one side and constant retreat on the other—until the day when they are suddenly declared to be the country’s official ideology.”

-Ayn Rand

The public debut of “Caitlyn” Jenner represents a watershed moment for American culture. Though most have not realized it, Jenner’s coming out party constitutes a significant “trial balloon” on the part of the progressive left and the media. It is an attempt to cash in on years of carefully managed stories on transgender “discrimination,” sympathetic portrayals of transgender characters in entertainment, and the generally successful campaign of the gay rights movement and social justice activists.

The goal is simple: normalize transgenderism to such an extent that any criticism of the concept or its practitioners will not be tolerated.

They must not be allowed to succeed. Whether the silent majority of Americans realize it or not, the transgender issue represents the last best opportunity to turn the tide in the culture wars. Make no mistake: the progressives are winning. Twenty years ago a person could openly criticize homosexuality. Today, thanks to the Supreme Court, people who do not enthusiastically endorse gay marriage are branded as bigots, disqualified from high-profile business positions, and generally dismissed as ignorant hicks whose views are outside of the scope of acceptable thought.

Media outlets have already taken sides and are branding people as being “transphobic” for not accepting the idea that Bruce Jenner is now a female. It is now “bigoted” to refer to Bruce as a “he.” Even so much as joking about Jenner is verboten. The media is rallying around him, protecting him, in spite of the fact that his refusal to get sex reassignment surgery, his sexual preference for women, and his recently having killed someone in a car accident all make him a very poor candidate as the face of transgenderism.

Nevertheless, they have made him the poster boy, hoping that everyday TV watchers won’t sweat the details and that the popularity of the Kardashians will keep him relevant. The next steps include some Will and Grace style sitcom to make transgenders seem more hip and fun, adoption by the Democratic Party as the next great civil rights issue, and finally a sustained campaign of legal and private ideological bullying until transgender acceptance is the new normal.


"The Line In The Sand"

Why must we draw the line at transgenderism? I argue that legitimization of transgenderism would constitute a cultural sea change. It would be the first time the cultural fascists had succeeded in enforcing genuine doublethink. Leftist ideology regarding transgenderism not only contradicts existing progressive doctrines (feminism), but is also literally false. You are being ordered to believe in a fairy tale—the idea that a dog can transform into a cat if it just wishes for it hard enough—and this is where the danger lies.

To be clear, I do not argue that we need to persecute or hate transgenders: people have the right to choose to play dress up and freely associate with others who indulge their delusions. What we need to protect is our right to disapprove of their behavior and reject their “science.” We must dig our heels in and fight. One is reminded of Picard’s words on the Borg in First Contact:

“We’ve made too many compromises already, too many retreats. They invade our space and we fall back. They assimilate entire worlds and we fall back. Not again! The line must be drawn here! This far, no farther!”: might as well be GamerGate’s slogan.

Of course, in the film Jean-Luc eventually agrees with Lily, though this does not refute his point about the Borg. He is right when he says that repeated compromise and surrender will not work. As in any war, the longer good men wait to fight back, the more difficult it is to overcome a metastasizing and emboldened evil.

The progressives have been encouraged by traditional Americans’ reluctance to fight back due to a mixture of indifference, moral cowardice, and bemusement. They are strengthened by the tendency of mainstream society to not take them seriously, to say “Who cares about Bruce Jenner and the reality TV sideshow!”, and to think that the goodwill and tolerance extended toward progressives will be returned.

This last point is crucial when we consider the history of previous civil rights causes. Earlier progressive campaigns pertaining to issues such as women’s lib, gay rights, and miscegenation had decent libertarian justifications and did not seek to impose much on society save tolerance of alternative life choices. (Social conservatives would likely argue that there were other negative consequences.)

Transgenderism, by contrast, imposes a great deal on American society. It requires us to revisit all questions of sex segregation, everywhere from schools to sports leagues to bathrooms. And note that this is all demanded based on the softer concept, “gender,” as transgenders have all but stopped using the term “transsexual.” They understand that with current technology, sex is immutable.

Since gender is supposedly just about feelings instead of biology, transgender logic would allow any man to claim he is a woman and waltz into a women’s locker room. There is no requirement that he pass for a female, nor is there a requirement that his “feeling” be permanent.


"The Real Danger"

The biggest problem with the transgender agenda is that it erodes our right to our own minds and to our perceptions of reality. A man is not a woman merely because he believes he is one, yet the progressives would have us believe so on pain of social ostracism, loss of employment, and discrimination lawsuits. If we give progressives the right to redefine reality, then we are no better off than Winston in 1984 when he was tortured for refusing to say that 2 and 2 equal 5 (or to continue the Star Trek references, Picard when he was tortured by the Cardassians for refusing to pretend there were five lights. And isn’t it weird that “Cardassian” sounds like “Kardashian?”)

What argument could there possibly be against polygamy, pedophilia, zoophilia, or any range of (currently) unacceptable behaviors? If the legal criteria for a thing’s identity is mere belief on the part of the subject, why shouldn’t a child be allowed to have a romantic relationship with an adult if he believes himself to be an adult as well?

Children are too young to make that choice you say? Then why are there transgender children? Surely you can’t argue that a small child ought to be able to take hormones and change their gender (a decision that will have a massive impact on the rest of their lives), yet cannot consent to sex. If feelings are good enough in one case, then why not the other?

We are not only legitimizing a subculture that will invite massive legal headache and mischief upon our society, we are also establishing a criteria for said legitimacy that is so patently irrational and dangerous as to ensure an endless queue of additional subcultures will come forward seeking the same affirmation from society.

It is perhaps ironic that it is the traditionalists and conservatives that are arguing that there is more to being a woman than copying stereotypical gender norms and looking the part. To say that Bruce Jenner is a woman after a bit of surgery and makeup is degrading to the idea of womanhood. The case of Rachel Dolezal shows that black people are not especially tolerant of whites identifying as black merely because they “feel” they are. Yet there is no strong argument against transracialism if we accept transgenderism.

Given the example of Dolezal, women should be just as insulted at the pretense of someone like Bruce Jenner. Lacking the biology and differing treatment from society that comes from actually being a woman, his claim that he “has always felt like a woman” is absurd on its face. What he really feels is a compulsive desire to play dress up: to make manifest a fetishized ideal of femininity brought about by his own psychological insecurities and a “grass is always greener” presumption about life as a woman.

Transgender people suffer from a pervasive mental illness, and as a result they deserve our sympathy. There is no reason to be violent or mean toward them. Still, we should not be expected to affirm their neuroses anymore than we should affirm the beliefs of a schizophrenic who believes himself to be an alien.

The time for compromise is over. Do not apologize for “misgendering” them, do not feel bad for calling him “Bruce,” do not be afraid to make jokes about them (they say worse things about whites and Christians), and do not ever apologize for rejecting their unscientific hogwash. This noisy .001% of the population is sick and should not be allowed to dictate to the rest of us. When they tell you to move, plant yourself like a tree by the river of truth and tell them: no. You move.

Dave Daubenmire #fundie newswithviews.com

The election of 2016 will go down in history as a watershed moment in the battle for Western Civilization. Against all odds the most anti-Christian Party in the history of American was jettisoned from their perch of power. The miraculous election of Donald Trump did not happen without the intervention of Almighty God.

We can argue all day as to whether his election was a blessing or a curse but no matter which side of the goal line you stand you cannot deny the Supernatural intervention. Donald Trump was God’s foot-in-the-door to the anti-Christ Clinton’s and their criminal enterprise with their machinations designed to heave the final shovel of dirt on this once Christian American Republic.

It is my belief that very few Christians understand how close we were to the criminalization of Christianity and the overthrow of Western Civilization. The fact that you think what I just said was hyperbole shows just how blind you were to the sword of Damocles swaying over our necks.

I believe in the very depths of my being that Almighty God has given us a temporary and final reprieve from the outpouring of His terrible wrath. Could it be that in His wrath he has remembered mercy?

Hannah R. McClintock #fundie dailywire.com

[Sorry for a WTF source, but the only non-wingnut sites covering this were Liveleak and Portland PD homesite itself.]

On Saturday, a 19-year-old so-called "anti-fascist" protester was arrested after she punched and spat on demonstrators at a #HimToo rally in Portland.

The #HimToo rally was organized by conservative activist Haley Adams to draw awareness to the sexual victimization of men and the falsely accused. Left-wing counter-protesters showed up to disrupt the event. Demonstrators and at least one reporter on site were harassed and assaulted by the agitators. The rally ended with a total of six arrests.

In footage captured by independent journalist and Quillette Magazine editor Andy C. Ngo, a young Antifa counter-protester later identified as Hannah R. McClintock by the Portland Police Bureau confronts male demonstrators at the rally. Backed by a chant of "We believe survivors" by her fellow Antifa activists, McClintock gets herself into a fighting stance and waves on the demonstrators to apparently engage in a physical altercation with her. She also spits on them as she repeatedly yells the word "b****."

Later in the video, McClintock physically assaults the male demonstrators.

Two #HimToo activists are heard in the video directing their fellow protesters not to fight back against the female and to "calm down."

"Let it happen, let it happen," says one of the protesters. "Don't touch her. Let her attack us, let her attack us."

Apparently failing to elicit the reaction she wants, the aggressive Antifa female continues with her antics. McClintock repeatedly gets in the men's faces and spits on them yet again.

"It's all good, it's all good," a #HimToo protester says calmly in response. "Let her spit. It's all good."

McClintock assaults a #HimToo protester once again before a swarm of Portland officers take her away.

"McClintock was arrested near Southwest 3rd Avenue and Southwest Taylor Street. McClintock was lodged at the Multnomah County Jail on a charge of Harassment," says a press release from the Portland Police Bureau.

Reginald Genovese #fundie iambilly.wordpress.com

God bless the party of God. steele has come out and said what the vast majority of Americans believe and know to be the truth. God ordained marriage as between a man and a woman. adam and eve, not adam and steve.

God has blessed us with steele’s leadership. he is willing to stand up to the loud immoral minority who wish to promote perversion for their own sick and twisted agenda. this is the difference between the republicans and the democrat party. republicans are willing to take a stand on principle whilst the democrat party will bend which ever way the far left perverts agenda tells them to bend.

slavery was not a founding principle of our country. slavery was forced into the constitution by liberal slave owners in the southern states. the true conservatives of new england tried to block it, but were overwhelmed by the minority much as is happening now. discrimination was not written into our constitution. it was forced in by those who want to create victims because victims become liberals. remember that it was the conservative republican president lincoln who freed the slaves, not the liberal democrat party.

mark my words. this depression will continue to get worse and worse and worse until Americans rediscover the morality of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ as expressed the the infallible Holy Bible. we must as a nation stand up to the perverts and their holocaust agenda to destroy Christians. we must stop the liberal socialists.

John Zmirak #fundie stream.org

John Zmirak
I agree with every word that Michael Brown wrote condemning Alt-Right intolerance. I’ve written for many years about the evils of racial narcissism. I’ve noted how Alt-Right spokesmen endorse even the vilest evil on earth today — abortion — for crank “eugenic” reasons. These are not good people. We should flee their evil company.

Nor should we ever abandon Christianity’s bone-deep universalism. I’m a Celtic Slav. My ancestors were tree-worshiping pagans. So I am grateful to the Jews for passing on both the Law and the Gospel. I wouldn’t want them locking me out because I lack father Abraham’s chromosomes.

Each of us faces temptations of tribalism or simple, ugly bias. Both reject the love of neighbor that Jesus demands of us.

Who Feeds the Alt-Right? The Christian Left.
But I’d like to put Dr. Brown’s comments in perspective. I would like to explain: Why are some otherwise sensible Christians tempted by Alt-Right stances, to the peril of their souls? To do that, I must point to other, subtler, more insidious errors. Most of those tempted to Alt-Right heresy are driven there as a violent over-reaction to globalism and multiculturalism.

Heresies usually come in pairs — each one equally far from the truth, but in opposite directions. Each claims to “cure” the other. That’s how they worm their way into our hearts. The Monophysites denied that Jesus has a human nature. They thought this the only way to nail shut the door against the Arian heresy. (Arians denied Our Lord’s divinity.) And so on, through the centuries.

Globalism and multiculturalism don’t lurk in dank corners of Twitter and 4chan. They strut around Harvard Yard. At Brussels and Davos, they’re the official party line. They infect the counsels of bishops and evangelists. These errors get funded by George Soros, and praised by secular media. They’re spread by the same bureaucrats at the United Nations and the European Union who fight the Church on life and marriage. Who threaten its basic freedoms. These errors serve secular culture as a new, post-Christian religion.

Globalism: A New Creed for Post-Christians
Don’t take it from me: It was gay liberal Catholic Andrew Sullivan who pointed out that this movement acts like a self-righteous, intolerant creed. Another name these errors go by is the wonkish-sounding “Intersectionality.” Here’s what Sullivan says of it:

“Intersectionality” is the latest academic craze sweeping the American academy. On the surface, it’s a recent neo-Marxist theory that argues that social oppression does not simply apply to single categories of identity — such as race, gender, sexual orientation, class, etc. — but to all of them in an interlocking system of hierarchy and power. …

It is operating, in Orwell’s words, as a “smelly little orthodoxy,” and it manifests itself, it seems to me, almost as a religion. It posits a classic orthodoxy through which all of human experience is explained — and through which all speech must be filtered. Its version of original sin is the power of some identity groups over others. To overcome this sin, you need first to confess, i.e., “check your privilege,” and subsequently live your life and order your thoughts in a way that keeps this sin at bay. The sin goes so deep into your psyche, especially if you are white or male or straight, that a profound conversion is required.

Like the Puritanism once familiar in New England, intersectionality controls language and the very terms of discourse. It enforces manners. It has an idea of virtue — and is obsessed with upholding it. The saints are the most oppressed who nonetheless resist. The sinners are categorized in various ascending categories of demographic damnation, like something out of Dante. The only thing this religion lacks, of course, is salvation. Life is simply an interlocking drama of oppression and power and resistance, ending only in death.

A Workplace-Safe Religion
Multiculturalist globalism is as worldly as — and not a whit more humane than — the paganized “German Christianity” that the Nazis foisted on Germans. But it has its hooks deeply sunk in “Mainline” Christianity, both Catholic and Protestant. Preaching it won’t get you banned from social media. Or silenced on campus. It might even get you a job writing manifestos for bishops.

Want to start a career as a successful public speaker? Get certified somehow as a specialist in countering “white male privilege.” You could tour Christian campuses for the rest of your natural life. You’ll never encounter a heckler. Even bigots who oppose you will likely be shamed into silence.

Multiculturalist globalism is every bit as worldly as — and not a whit more humane than — the paganized “German Christianity” that the Nazis foisted on Germans.
Meanwhile, fair-minded intellectuals like Charles Murray get driven off campuses by gangs of hooded rioters. Critics of mass Muslim influx into Europe get imprisoned, fined, or silenced on social media. But Muslims who favor sharia, or blacks who call for white genocide, sail smoothly along with the Zeitgeist.

Addled Christians mistake multiculturalism’s fashionable teachings for the Gospel’s real implications. Church leaders encourage this, if they crave the love of the worldly. So (unlike Dr. Brown) they loudly and exclusively condemn heresies like racism and xenophobia that are already widely despised. They treat these as burning issues that threaten millions.

Shouting “Fire” in a Flooded Theater
And that makes Screwtape smile. Remember how he boasted:

We direct the fashionable outcry of each generation against those vices of which it is least in danger and fix its approval on the virtue nearest to that vice which we are trying to make endemic. The game is to have them all running about with fire extinguishers whenever there’s a flood, and all crowding to that side of the boat which is already nearly gunwale under.

In fact, the loudest anti-racists in the churches often gladly embrace the opposite errors. As answers to white racism and xenophobia they demand crippling white guilt and de facto open borders — even to millions of angry, intolerant Muslims. No wonder some people who reject the multiculturalist heresy are tempted to lurch to the other evil extreme.

Christians who are too attached to their race or nationhood are like the Pharisees. But globalists are Sadducees.
It’s our job as Christians to strike a moral balance. Not to moralize and grandstand, in the hope that the secular left will pat us on the head. And no, not to blindly embrace a pagan error, just to tick off the liberals.

Christians who denounce President Trump over immigration typically condemn all restrictions or limits. They don’t argue that our quotas are too low, or that our enforcement methods need improvement. They spastically denounce every attempt to get our nation’s borders under control. But you never hear them criticize nations in Latin America or Africa that also patrol their borders and limit immigration. Racism is a weird kind of sin, which only white folks can commit.

The Only Thing Worse than a Pharisee
Let’s put this issue in stark New Testament terms. Christians who are too attached to their race or nationhood are like the Pharisees. They have taken things that are genuinely good and made of them a fetish. They’ve mistaken traditions of men for the law of almighty God. They dimly feel that their identity alone — say, as a law-abiding middle class white person — somehow counts for them as a virtue. (Just so, some Pharisees waved off Jesus’ call to conversion because they were “children of Abraham.”) Jesus fulminated against the Pharisees, but He bothered to preach among them. However misguided, at least they were making an effort.

But globalists are the Sadduccees, to whom Jesus barely spoke — even when they put Him on trial. The Sadduccees collaborated with the Roman pagans to keep their hold on power. Just so, the globalists work with anti-Christian, anti-democratic Leviathans like the UN and the European Union to silence the voice of voters. They take their coins not from Caesar but from Soros.

The comfortable, sophisticated Sadduccees sniffed after Roman globalism. Much better than the narrow, “bigoted” nationalism of the Pharisees. Just as the Sadducees waved off large parts of the Jewish scriptures, the globalists shrug at life, sexual morals, and religious freedom — which just happen to be the issues over which the wealthy and the worldly now hate the Church.

So please, for the love of God, avoid the Alt-Right and its minions. But to solve the Alt-Right problem, you need to strike at its roots: It’s an inchoate, angry reaction to a powerful, slippery heresy that preens as a winsome angel of light.

NotedScholar #crackpot #racist sciencedefeated.wordpress.com

The Three Thousand Year Reich of Negative Numbers (part one)

The curious reader might be interested to know that Diophantus and the Greek thinkers rejected the concept of negative numbers (and irrational numbers, of course) as “patently ridiculous” and “idiotic.” And we are a Greek-based society. So to borrow David Hume’s plaintive question – Then whence Negative Numbers? The answer to this question lies in the Orient. If there was ever a “yellow menace,” negative numbers are it. The Chinese, the Indians, and the Muslims gave us negative numbers. Not the superior Greeks. Is this a coincidence? I think not. These countries have had a vested interest in the concept from the very beginning.

Fortunately, however, negative numbers are behind a very thin conceptual veil. Once removed, it is easy to see the “Chinaman behind the curtain.” I’ll just say QUED ahead of time. Observe:

I can have three horses, but I cannot have negative three horses. Some people, suffering from Cognitive Dissonance (CD), suggest that “debt” is a manifestation of negative numbers. But that’s really just arguing semantics. Wittgenstein and Derrida disproved semantics back in the 20th century. In any case, what’s really going on in the situation is not that I have negative horses; rather, I owe some positive horses (Positive horses=horses that exist; countable horses. Who would want to be owed imaginary horses?). We can get by just fine without negative numbers. Besides, the Universe is full of stuff, not -stuff. If you would like to confirm this, here is the relevant empirical experiment:

Turn your head this way and that, and look at things. You may if you wish do this in a lab, for a more sciencey feel.
This conclusion, in conjunction with the abolition of infinity, has pathbreaking – nay, watershed – consequences for the number line, which now looks like this:

image

I constantly get compliments for how incredibly parsimonious my arguments are – well, this one perhaps beats them all!

If the abolition of negative numbers in the conceptual schema catches on in the West, we can expect an end to the Three Thousand Year Reich of the Neo-Zoroastrians who think that the number line is an exact balance between negative and positive (seriously, what are the chances anyway that it would be an exact balance? It’s even worse than 1/Penultimate. It’s zero!). Now some might say that empirically the Universe is symmetrical, and they might cite anti-matter as confirmation of this. But there is not room here to discuss anti-matter; I’ll leave that for a future post!

James Miller #sexist returnofkings.com

The Case For Gendo-Nationalism
image
James Miller is a political strategist and policy intellectual from New York City. He is the founder and president of the James Miller Foundation.

The alt-right and their leaders have often stressed the need for the establishment of a ethno-state on the North American continent. While I can understand many of their concerns as a middle-class white guy who lives in a gated community in the suburbs of New York City, I honestly do not have to deal with the minority problem on a day to day basis.

Whether the Bronx is being flooded with new arrivals is simply not my problem. Thots, on the other hand, affect us wherever we live. It doesn’t matter how great your neighborhood is or even how religious your state is. America has become a degenerate nation, and thottery has pervaded all aspects of American life—Northern and Southern, Protestant and Catholic, conservative and liberal, normie and alt-right.

image
A thot prepares to flash her breasts to a crowd of onlookers in a ‘conservative’ state in the Deep South.

Traditionalism Is Hopeless

Many on the right advocate for traditionalism. They think we can just return to the days of a nuclear family, reverse all three waves of feminism, and let women assume their traditional role. While I respect the arguments made by traditionalists, I have concluded that any sort of rollback is now politically impossible in the United States. We have lost the culture war. There is no going back. Sure, you can flee to a country where remnants of traditionalism still exist, but they are merely a little further back on the ongoing global shift towards female ‘liberation’ and the dissolution of family life.

Furthermore, while this problem has been substantially amplified in recent years, it is certainly not a modern one. Thots have consistently been the downfall of powerful men throughout history. John F. Kennedy was compromised by the Soviet Union as a result of depraved female temptresses. Even Adolf Hitler’s defeat in the Second World War can be attributed largely to the presence of Eva Braun. Cleopatra’s betrayal of Mark Antony the moment a more alpha chad arrived on the scene surely serves as one of the clearest demonstrations of the subversion of the opposite sex.

Richard Spencer similarly and correctly recognizes a return to the days of actual white supremacy is impossible and undesirable, and instead advocates for a white ethno-state, building on the momentum of left-wing identity politics movements. Although I respectfully disagree with him on that issue, his fundamental analysis is correct. We cannot return to an undefined point in the past when things were somehow better on the issues that we care about. All we can do is seek to influence the future. I have thus come to the conclusion that the only solution to our current thot debacle is peaceful separation between the sexes, and a resulting male gendo-state.

Now, this notion may sound absurd. Most traditionalists love and respect women, and simply wish for them to return to their historical place in society, rather than be done away with altogether. They must come to understand that separation has now become a necessity.

image
We may reach the point of open conflict with the opposing gender.

Separation Is Necessary

Cultural feminism has degraded women to the point where co-existence is a net negative to males. Women weaken men by their very presence, co-opting and hijacking even traditionalist movements by embracing the rhetoric and yet leaving much to be desired in terms of the personal example they set.

As the last few weeks have shown, women are able to completely destroy the reputations of decent, upstanding men through false accusations of sexual abuse. Women compete with us in a job market that is rigged against us by politicians who have come to see women as an essential voting bloc to appease. Women now even proudly declare that they do not need or want men in their lives.

Why don’t we put that to the test? Let us see how well the opposing gender fares when left completely to their own devices. In this way, we could use the rise of feminism as force of acceleration in order to promote our bid for nationhood. It is ironically fairly likely that the world’s first gendo-state will consist of pink haired female ogres LARPing as Amazons. But once the precedent is set, males will have a unique opportunity to seize the moment and build the case for our secession.

The Vision

Gendo-nationalism would involve near-total separation between men and women. A physical border would be erected between the respective male and female nation-states, and travel between these gendo-states would be tightly controlled and require permission from the governing authority of the gendo-state being entered. In the male gendo-state, which I have little doubt will be far more successful than its female competitor, male chauvinism will be the zeitgeist of the new order.

In addition, we need to think about the only real thing we need women for—sex. Advancements in robotics in recent years are quickly making this need obsolete. Future improvements in cloning technology may even allow us to replace women for the purposes of reproduction. Until the point at which a solution is devised, the gendo-state could have a work visa system which prostitutes and surrogates could utilize without permanent settlement in our new nation.

image
Soon, we will no longer need women to lead fulfilling sex lives.

The Path Ahead

Before we can have separation, we need to have a general sense of male identity. Now, I believe this to an extent to be inherent and hardwired, hence the presence of so many all-male social groups in our society. Nevertheless, we must promote the importance of masculinity and push close identification with our gender’s collective interests as a component of that.

Subsequently, we need to urge our fellow men to gradually start removing all emotional attachment to women. They’re to be seen as a tool, not a crutch. Emotional attachment makes men the weaker sex because women are inherently able to exploit it, and ensures the perpetuation of the anti-male status quo. Once it is overcome, the foundations for a gendo-state can be laid.

Free from the shackles of womankind, men will be able to embrace their true potential. We will have hours more in our days which would otherwise be wasted on entertaining vacuous thots. We will no longer be treated like second class citizens in the very nations we built and shed our blood for. Our inherent physical and mental supremacy will give us a substantial edge in the world marketplace. Much as ethno-nationalist movements played a major role in defining the 20th century, my hope is that gendo-nationalism will define the 21st.

Patrick Scrivener #conspiracy reformation.org

The Conspiracy to Kill King George III Exposed At Last!!

[...]

The first attempt to murder the king happened in 1788

It was amazing how different father and son were. It almost seemed that the son had completely different parents.

The Prince of Wales ordered "physicians" Richard Warren and Sir George Baker to expedite his way to the throne.

The "doctors" poisoned the king, but our great JEHOVAH preserved his life, because he was a great king and a praying Christian.

When he refused to die, the "physicians" said that he had "gone mad."

Their poison having failed to kill the king, the physicians said that the king was mad and incapable of performing his royal duties. Parliament's answer was that the Prince of Wales should be appointed Regent:

By November it seemed likely that the twenty-eight-year reign of George III was coming to an end and that the Prince would become Regent. As such he would exercise royal power to construct governments, appoint and dismiss ministers, create peers and distribute patronage. It was assumed that within hours of taking over the Prince would dismiss Pitt and put the Opposition into power. The three great goals of eighteenth-century politics –the disposing of peerages, places and pensions–would be his at last. As for Maria, who could say what would happen to her? (Munson, Maria Fitzherbert, p. 213).

On the morning of November 29, 1788, the king was forcibly removed from Windsor Castle to the White House at Kew.

The king was removed from his family and placed in a restraining chair developed by "Dr." Benjamin Rush.

A fierce debate was then held in Parliament to make the Prince of Wales Regent and acting king.

The king was confined in a torture chair right out of a Spanish Inquisition dungeon.

The king was confined in a torture chair right out of a Spanish Inquisition dungeon designed by Revolutionary "patriot" Dr. Benjamin Rush. In the most unkindest cut of all, the torture chair was called a "tranquilizing chair:"

He was also confined in a specially made chair–his 'coronation chair' he called it–to ensure his 'compliance with whatever [was] thought proper'. And once, when he was tied in the chair to be given a severe lecture on his improper and repetitive remarks about Lady Pembroke, a handkerchief was stuffed in his mouth to keep him quiet until the reprimand was completed. (Hibbert, George III, p. 277).

People who brought up the illegal marriage of the Prince of Wales to Maria Fitzherbert were also imprisoned for libel.

Despite all the efforts of the 'doctors" to kill the king or drive him mad, they were abject failures. The king gradually recovered, and by March 1789, he was ready to resume his kingly duties:

On 14 March the King returned to his favourite residence, and at every village on the road crowds turned out to cheer him. He rode on horseback, and the warmth of his reception when he arrived quite overwhelmed him. 'All Windsor came out to meet the King', wrote Fanny Burney, and even the soldiers on guard at the Castle were in tears. He had a much quieter night, he wrote the next morning, than any he had experienced since his illness; 'and the joy that appears in every countenance and the good sense of my neighbours in not wishing to incommode cannot fail of having a due effect'. (Brooke, King George III, p. 342).

That Papal plot had been forestalled . . . for now....Exactly 10 years later, another watershed event occurred called the French Revolution.

[...]

The second attempt to murder the king happened in 1811

By 1811, Israel had been reestablished in the New World and the Louisiana Purchase had extended her boundaries to the mighty Mississippi River.

Parliament had given the green light to the invasion and occupation of New Orleans. The Christian king would never have countenanced such perfidy and Machiavellian double-dealing, so Parliament ordered his assassination by poison.

With the invasion of New Orleans imminent, Parliament ordered the king's doctors to poison him.

The "mad doctors" failed again to kill the king because he was divinely protected.

They only succeeded in having the 73-year-old king declared "insane."

This time nothing was left to chance and the big battalions were brought in:

A day or so later the King became so difficult to control that Dr Samuel Simmons, the mad-doctor, was summoned to Windsor. He went away again when he was given to understand that he was not to be given sole charge of the case; and thereafter the patient was left in the care of a whole succession of doctors who were already at Windsor or soon to go there–Sir Henry Halford, Matthew Baillie, Henry Reynolds, David Dundas, Robert Battiscombe, William Heberden, and Robert and John Willis. Also in attendance from time to time were John Meadows, a former surgeon-apothecary at St Luke's Hospital, and a Mr Briand, keeper of a madhouse at Kensington, who arrived with two formidable assistants. (Hibbert, George III, p. 397).

Their potent poison failed again but they did succeed in having the king declared "insane." That was enough for Parliament to make the Prince of Wales Regent.

The Prince of Wales was Regent during the momentous Battle of New Orleans.

Had that invasion succeeded, the king would have been strangled by his doctors and the Prince of Wales would have become king.

The mask would come off and Great Britain would have a Papal sovereign once again.

His wife Maria Fitzherbert would have been another Jezebel and Bloody Mary Tudor. Britannia owes a tremendous debt of gratitude to the heroic general Jackson.

King George received his great reward in Heaven in 1820

For the last 9 years of his life, the king had to endure the indignity of having his murderous son reign in his stead as Regent. Additionally, he endured a whole lifetime of persecution because of his Christian Faith.

Thanks to the doctors, the king went blind and deaf toward the end of his life.

A new term was invented for his "malady" called porphyria.

The king did torment his doctors by staying alive until 1820.

William #fundie ca.answers.yahoo.com

(In response to a Christian who mentions why American Christian Zionists never seem to mind about the Christian Palestinian minority)

Spoken like a true atheist troll. Actually all Christians know that Israel is repsonsible for the existence of the Holy Bible, We also know they were God's chosen people long before we came about then of course favortism and legalism were no more because of Christ's sacrifice. Still those who curse Israel will be cursed and those who bless Israel will be blessed and there is no denying that. So your lack of knowledge has atheist troll written all over it.

Speaking to Israel's forefather Abraham God says, "I will bless those who bless you, and whoever curses you I will curse; and all peoples on earth will be blessed through you." - Genesis 12:3 and what is for Abraham is for Israel.

Now for your claim that Palestinians are Christians too:

After the second Jewish revolt under Bar Cochba (A.D. 132-135) it is said the Roman Emperor Hadrian renamed the land of Israel and Judea as Palastina (Palestine) after the ancient enemies of the Jews - the Philistines. Because of his hatred of the Jews, it was meant to be an insult to dishonor them and remove their Jewish rights and history.

Until so called Palestinians can define their Nation's capitol, their borders, their party politics, their financial institutions, their laws, their origins, their government's protocol on every level, their healthcare system, their emergency response system, their social services, their infrastructure, their foreign and domestic policies and any and all other institutions and ethics that would afford them the right to nationhood among the world's nations why should they even be recognized?

So what Christian in their right mind would become terroristic or part of an insult against the nation (Israel) that helped us Gentiles understand God and God's will?

You sir are an imposter at best.

EDIT: Thumbs down - of course all you socialist atheist liberals would come running to the defense of your atheist troll friend........ rotfl...........
Source(s):
Every American Christian prays, "Lord watch over and protect Israel, secure your land and give it peace."

Every American Christian will always be for Israel and support Israel even in their prayers.

Robert Brazil #conspiracy elizabethanauthors.org

You may ask: what Shakespeare problem? He was one of the most successful screenwriters of the 1990's and he never has to be paid. He gets away with crude jokes that would be called tasteless anywhere else. Shakespeare's just fine the way he is! Shakespeare is high and low. Shakespeare is gay and straight. The Bard, whose personal story is unknown and unquestioned, has been reduced to an icon or symbol of rarefied intelligence, of impenetrable, unreachable genius.
All things to all readers, the author has conveniently disappeared in favor of his words.

The problem has emerged because the few biographical facts that exist about Mr. Shaksper of Stratford-on-Avon don't tally with what we would expect from the brilliant author of the plays and poems. The content, attitude, life experience, interests, and deep classical education evident in the plays surpass what is on record for William Shaksper of Stratford-on-Avon. Nothing in his life suggests that he was the author of the Shakespeare Canon, or had a reputation in his own lifetime to that effect.

The man commonly accepted to be the author Shakespeare was born in the village of Stratford-on-Avon in April of 1564. There is no record of his actual birthday, but the boy was christened on April 26, 1564, and his name, as given, was Gulielmus Shaksper. No, he wasn't Italian, … "Gulielmus" was the scribe's Latin spelling of William. The Shaksper family's name is spelled dozens of different ways, but the most frequent, in his own time, was Shaxper, or Shaksper. The boy's father, John Shaksper, was a glove maker. William Shaksper himself was essentially a grocer, grain trader and landlord by profession. No one in the village of Stratford thought of him as learned, bookish, poetical or theatrical, nor are there any legends, let alone records, of him producing any local entertainment.

The local records only confirm that William Shaksper was a merchant, not a lyricist or genius of letters. Shaksper's will mentions no books or manuscripts. There is no remnant of any evidence that he was even literate himself. His parents and his children could not read. (What writer would not teach his own children to read ?) Nor did his children benefit, or show they had any knowledge of his alleged celebrity as a playwright. The few historical connections which would place Shaksper as an actor or investor in the Globe Theater, or any other theatrical enterprise were all created after the "fact". There is no contemporaneous evidence that Shaksper, the grain dealer of Stratford, was the author of the Shakespeare Plays and Poems. In short, there is a rather big Shakespeare Problem, and it is one of the greatest historical and literary mysteries of all time. The modern image of Shakespeare the Author, in his quaint country cottage, writing for a living while suing his neighbors in small claims court, is a myth. The facts concerning William Shaksper of Stratford-on-Avon tell a different story.

(..)

Because of the peculiar facts stated above and more, critical doubt about the prevailing myth of the Shakespeare phenomenon has been raised over the past several centuries by some of the greatest minds in Literature, Philosophy, and Science.

(..)

The earliest speculation about a hidden hand behind the Shakespeare plays was in 1785, when the Reverend James Wilmot, D.D. attributed the authorship to Sir Francis Bacon. In 1848, an American consulate named Joseph C. Hart speculated in his book, The Romance of Yachting, that the Stratford man could not have written the plays. Hart proposed Ben Jonson as the author.

The issue became popular knowledge in 1857 with the appearance of The Philosophy of the Plays of Shakespeare Unfolded, by Delia Bacon. Nathaniel Hawthorne wrote the preface, and helped with both the publication and promotion. This can be considered to be the first Anti-Stratfordian book. Although this work is ponderous, pretentious, and thin on facts, the author launched a whole genre of thought and criticism with her idea that the Shakespeare plays were a vehicle for a new philosophy, that looked beyond religious minutiae, and was based on a higher love and reason. Because of her name, (though she was not related to Francis Bacon), people have assumed that Delia Bacon was the first Baconian. She was not. Delia believed in a group theory of authorship, though she offered that Francis Bacon supplied the philosophy that infuses the plays. In her book, she named Sir Walter Raleigh as the mastermind who created the Shakespeare Plays, using the talents of a circle of men. In Delia's view this is how it went with Raleigh and Company:

"He became at once the centre of that little circle of high born wits and poets, the elder wits and poets of the Elizabethan age, that were then in their meridian there. Sir Philip Sidney, Thomas Lord Buckhurst, Henry Lord Paget, Edward Earl of Oxford, and some other, are included in the contemporary list of this courtly company, whose doings are somewhat mysteriously adverted to by a critic, who refers to the condition of the Art of Poesy at that time ."

(..)

In the World War I era, research into the authorship problem took a different turn. Robert Fraser's The Silent Shakespeare, 1915, offered William Stanley, the 6th Earl of Derby as the W.S. behind the Shakespeare name. In 1919 Abel Lefranc published Sous le Masque de "William Shakespeare". LeFranc also zeroed in on William Stanley, who was the son-in-law of the 17th Earl of Oxford. The watershed year in this field was 1920, when John Thomas Looney, a British schoolteacher proposed the theory that Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford, a Courtier to Queen Elizabeth I, was the author of the Shakespeare plays and poems. He outlined his hypothesis and discoveries in his book, "Shakespeare" Identified. This book had a wide reaching impact among intellectuals. It was reviewed favorably in the London press by John Galsworthy. Both Sigmund Freud and James Joyce read "Shakespeare" Identified and wrote about their impressions. Freud actually revised his interpretation of Hamlet in the light of his new understanding.

The "Status Quo" opinion seems to be that "Shakespeare is just fine the way he is." This is essentially the Stratfordian Paradigm. Shakespeare is seen as a miraculous freak of nature: a self educated country merchant who somehow learned the theater inside and out and wrote the plays for money, and nothing more. Within the Stratfordian position there are a thousand mythical biographies of Shakespeare, based on each modern author's deconstruction of the plays and poems, with the few flimsy facts about Shaksper thrown in for color.

The next paradigm or world-view is based on the variation: "Shakespeare had a little secret." This we may term the Radical Stratfordian position. Within this umbrella are theories based on the idea that Shaksper-of-Stratford was indeed the author, but he had a secret life that shamed him, or was dangerous, and has thus never been verified. The most popular is the "Shakespeare was Gay" theory. Runners up are: "Shakespeare was a secret Catholic", "Shakespeare was a Spy", or "Shakespeare was a member of a Secret Society".

Venturing into un-orthodoxy completely we encounter the idea that "Shakespeare was really somebody else, but who knows who?" This is the classic Anti-Stratfordian paradigm. The 33 arguments against Shaksper's authorship of Shakespeare that I listed above have all been fleshed out into full explanations in countless books published in the last 100 years. There are many Anti-Stratfordians, and a good number of them are content to have the whole thing be a fine mystery, without yearning for a definitive answer.

The final stage is called Heresy or Truth, depending on your opinion. It is when one begins to make the claim, that "Shakespeare was __________ " (fill in the blank). If you fill in the blank with Francis Bacon, you are a termed a Baconian; if you complete the equation with the Earl of Oxford, you are an Oxfordian.

Hanss #fundie ezekiel38rapture.blogspot.nl

The King James Bible Mystery Babylon Connection

image

Acts 12:4 1599 Geneva Bible (GNV)
4 And when he had caught him, he put him in prison, and delivered him to four quaternions of soldiers to be kept, intending after the Passover to bring him forth to the people.

Acts 12:4 Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
4 And when he had apprehended him, he put him in prison, and delivered him to four quaternions of soldiers to keep him; intending after Easter to bring him forth to the people.

Nowhere in Scripture did God promise a perfect English translation by a Mason King. The irrational mind control slave Roman Jesuit Masonic fronts want to mind control you into thinking so.

After an introduction we begin to present the data.
This video will begin to help you ask the question. Who of the KJVOnlyists are Roman Catholic Jesuit fronts. By saying this we are not implicating anyone apart from facts and data that prove they are Roman Counter Reformation Jesuit fronts. The point of the statement is to help you beware where KJOnlyism leads to. That is the gates of hell in Rome.

In this video we extort and show you how to purge out the purposeful mistranslated text of the KJV. The research in this video is drawn from over 20 years of study, prayer and revelation from God on the refutation of Gnosticism. We present this to you since no one has made the connection, and we see it is necessary when the NWO is promoting the KJV. This video reveals why.

We did get hacked in the process of creating this video. They did not want you to see the connection. Through perseverance we now present it to you. If you appreciate more uncompromising videos like this one, please help fund more projects.

If after seeing the leaven connection about the KJV in this video, if you still want to throw away your KJV Bible, even after we explained to you to judge every verse by it's original language meaning. You can always get the Geneva Bible and better yet, a KJ3 Literal Translation on e-sword.
http://www.e-sword.net/downloads.html

Part 2
British Israelism & The KJV English Onlyism Mystery Babylon Connection ?.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0vUpGtgLiZk

Confuting KJOnlyism, Psalm 12 Is The Refutation of Gnosticism, More Refutation of False KJOnlyism Gnosis ?.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7rHMR8bVpng

Vain Puffed Up KJOnlyism Mythologies of Flattering Double Heart Gnosticism Confuted ?.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=33H15pmhz_I

All the manuscript evidence for passover in Acts 12:4 ?.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m99kISzkKSQ

See an example why God did not "use" the faulty Easter translation to change the original intent of God's foundational Word ?.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XT6i3SZ7fqs

The oldest existing record of the King James Lodge, records "The Mutual Agreement" of 24 December, 1658. It records that James was "entered Freemason and Fellowcraft of the Lodge of Scoon" on 15 April, 1601."
http://freemasonry.bcy.ca/biography/james_vi/james_vi.html

This is concrete evidence of how King James was a Mason. Do not let others beguile you into duplicitous words that this is not hard concrete evidence. In those times there were no "Masonic certificates of initiation". The watershed process of "Masonic certificates of initiation" is generally taken to be the formation of the first Grand Lodge in London in 1717. Therefore the concrete evidence of the "record" for "The Mutual Agreement" of 24 December, 1658, records that James was "entered Freemason and Fellowcraft of the Lodge of Scoon" on 15 April, 1601." is factual as an ancient record.

Note: The Edward Macbean speculative Masonry research, post-1717, is just that. Duplicitous statements by "speculative" Masons, that always giving duplicitous statements about the true "record" being exposed, and when their dirty laundry is being exposed to the light of truth. They bring out the contradiction in an attempt to nullify their previous statements.

Also, the Stone of Scone that all the Kings and Queens of England have sat on during coronation. Also makes the King of England the head of the Masonic hierarchy. Therefore it is not logical that any King of England is not a Mason. Since they "sit" on their mythological Masonic "stone". Since at least the signing of the 1328 Treaty of Edinburgh. When Edward III agreed to return the Stone of Destiny to Scotland.

andafuture #fundie reddit.com

You can look in my comment history. I'm from the alt right and I used to be a feminist and anarchist. I still attend a prominent social justice oriented leftist academy for grad school and I work in the non profit world. I can quote Foucault or Deluze or bell hooks for you if you would like a seal of authenticity. I live in San Francisco and have for 7 years. There is really no way I can't be fully aware of the dominant leftists narrative and live here.

No I don't agree with him at all that vaccines cause Autism, if that is indeed his position. That is junk science and has no merit.
I disagree with him on a probably a majority of his positions, but I see him as the only candidate who is challenging neoliberal global capitalism, and I think this is the greatest threat to our country and to me personally. I think we need nationalism to have a cohesive population that can advocate for itself politically and I think several neoliberal policies (interventionist wars, free trade, illegal immigration and cultural diversity) work specifically and intentionally against nationhood. This is a last ditch and desperate attempt at nationhood. Clinton would have been the death blow to our nation and an acceleration of the United States into irreversible demographic change that would leave us (working class whites) politically and economically vulnerable to the corporate oligarchy. I think the neoliberal policies I enumerated above leave us physically less safe and culturally impoverished.

TLDR I voted for trump because I don't want to live in Brazil.

In regards to "the election being over" Clinton's policies and neoliberal ideology (which continue to be the dominant set of policies) would degrade our nation. This isn't about Clinton as a person, it's that she represents the dominant ideology which I see as a threat. This is still the dominant ideology of the academy and many other prominent cultural institutions.

Trumps cabinet may be full of billionaires but I don't care. Jeff Sessions has a strong record against illegal immigration which is my number one issue and I think the number one issue facing working class whites in California. I have confidence in Sessions, and that's mostly what I care about. I want lower rent, more jobs, and lower crime rates. I don't want to spend our social services budget on illegal immigrants or their children when we have Americans that need help. Diversity is proven to degrade civic life and I think that is a problem. I want to make America as white as possible and restore our culture.

And yes, I think women are easily tricked into voting against their self interest and the interest of society through emotional and moral manipulation. I think we would have more of the policies that I favor if we (women) didn't vote.

Reginald Genovese #fundie iambilly.wordpress.com

<b>This is a comment on my blog. The thread is regarding a post I did about the Florida hospital which denied a life-partner's request to be with her dying lover, despite having documents proving the relationship.</b>

America.

You must look at the totality in order to appreciate what America has done for all humanity. Would England still exist? Would Cuba still be a Spanish colony subjected to inhuman Catholic tortures? But America is losing itself, and thus, by extension, losing the entirety of humanity.

Our Constitution includes a paeon to our Almighty. Our President swore to uphold the Constitution so help him, God. Without the liberty of free will gifted us by the Almighty, our Constitution would not have been written.

Now we, as a nation, have begun to turn away from God, the Everlasting, the Almighty, the Eternal, the Loving. By granting rights to those who willingly engage in perversity, we risk losing our blessed covenant with the Lord. By all that is right, those who practise such pervisities should not even be allowed to live.

God ordained that marriage is between man and woman, or, in some cultures, women. No culture allows man to marry man, nor woman to marry woman. No society condones such perversity. Or, at least, no society has until now.

Massachussets allows perverts to marry. California tries, through judicial activism, to force through the same. And now, we face a financial and economic disaster to rival the Great Depression. And it is not just America. We bring down the world with us.

In the 1920s, America turned away from God. We were punished with depression and war, both of which reawakened American religiousity. Today, we have war and a burgeoning depression. Our only hope for America, nay, for the world, is to embrace God in all His infinite reason and infinite love so that the world may be born again through the cleansing of disaster.

Better one woman be denied a visit to her partner than America be damned. Better two men are kept out of pervisity than the world be lost.

David J. Stewart #fundie jesusisprecious.org

I know some local Baptist pastors who have rejected me, won't have anything to do with me, despise me, call me and Dr. Jack Hyles “cult” members, and hold a grudge against me, because of my King James Bible only position. These apostate pastors promote the modern corrupt Bible versions based upon the Alexandrian, Egypt, manuscripts. Their time of reckoning will come at the Judgment Seat of Christ (2nd Corinthians 5:10-11). Corrupt Bible versions always lead to corrupt doctrines, such as a false meaning of repentance, which hurts people! There is no crime in God's eyes any more serious for a pastor to commit than promoting a counterfeit Word of God.

These careless men nonchalantly dismiss their apostasy as a mere “difference in ministerial philosophy,” but it is far more... it is false religion on their part!!! I recently wrote a kind letter to some of these wayward men. They unkindly responded by comparing me and them to Barnabas and Paul, but it is more like the Prophets of Baal (them) and Elijah (me). Satan's grandest achievement in these last days has been the corrupt modern Bible revision movement. Literally, the American Bible Society says that there are approximately 900 English Bible versions. Can you believe that? Wow! It's sad but true. My friend, God only authored ONE BOOK!!!

I said these things to relate it to what I see in a rainbow. I have lost 52 pounds in just 3 months, since February 21st. I was 208 lbs in February. I weighed 156.8 this morning (May 15). My doctor told me last month that my type II diabetes is gone. Praise the Lord for that! I've been walking twice each day, to get my weight down. While walking I've seen dozens of rainbows in the clouds. Each time that I see a rainbow, I am reminded that God keeps all His promises. When I see each rainbow, I feel as if God is saying to me:

"Hang in there David! I'm going to reward you for standing for the King James Bible, and for exposing the corrupt Alexandrian manuscripts upon which all the modern Bible versions are based. You know from Psalm 138:2 how important my words are to Me. I have elevated my words above my own name, because just as a man's word is his bond, so also I as God am only as trustworthy as My word. I will honor my promises David, and since you've been faithful to my words, I will reward you, not those shallow pastors who don't care. I won't reward those unfaithful pastors who serve mammon, who promote corrupt Bibles, who have turned you away. I know you've been outcast by those unfaithful pastors. I see that you're despised and rejected by the neo-evangelical crowd. I know your pain, of both body and soul. I won't let your sacrifice and suffering go unnoticed or unrewarded David. I'm proud of you for standing for the truth, even though you've been weak through it all! Revelation 3:8, 'for thou hast a little strength, and hast kept my word, and hast not denied my name.'”

That is what I feel each and every time that I see a precious rainbow in the clouds. I am resolved more than ever to stand and fight the good fight of faith. While other shallow religious men are making a salary, promoting corruptible word (seed), and disgracing their profession in the clergy, I am standing firm and true upon the inspired, preserved and inerrant King James Bible!!!!!!!

Roy Batty #racist dailystormer.name

[From "Brazil Continues to Whip Its Negroes… Why Can’t We?"]

It appears that the liberal press has belatedly found out that bad shit happens in Brazil.

Now, the rest of the world found that little bit of trivia out the minute that LiveLeak and BestGore came online, when the total and uncensored weeping sore that is the Third World was revealed to millions of coddled Western Whites all at once.

This sort of thing has been going on for many Internet years and probably decades before that. The only thing that has changed is that the media has suddenly decided to become a professional round-the-clock internet nigger defense force and decided to throw a gay moral fit about it.

The Guardian

Naked and whimpering, his trousers around his ankles, the black teenage boy jerks and howls with pain as he is whipped with electric cable.

“Are you going to come back?” asks one of his tormentors. The youth shakes his head, unable to speak because he has been gagged.

Even by Brazilian standards of racism and cruelty, the whipping of the boy after he was caught stealing four bars of chocolate from a São Paulo supermarket has caused deep shock.

That simply isn’t true. This was pretty mild fare. And because I have normal T levels, I thought the whole thing was mildly amusing and shared a chuckle with the guards on the video.

[...]

Incredible. The thief even admits that this was the third time that he had stolen and been chased off by the guards, who at that point realized that more drastic measures were necessary. There is no way that the guards were White, either. This was a brown-on-brown incident, but Whitey still gets blamed – because of course.

No matter how many times I see it, I am still shocked by the sheer unbridled contempt for white people and general faggotry of the liberal press.

It often renders me speechless.

[...]

That guards filmed the torture showed how sure they were they would not get caught, Adami said: “All this is connected to the slavery past in Brazil where blacks were whipped night and day.”

Seems like every country that had black slaves figured out that only corporal punishment worked on blacks. And really, isn’t a few lashings and a lesson well-learned more humane than going in and out of prison on the taxpayer’s dime for years and years at a time?

I guess even liberals believe that monkeys belong in cages.

[...]

Mestizos and mulattos murdering one another for cheap chalupas in the favelas. This isn’t racism – these monsters are just feral and devour each other like some kind of hobgoblin creature from hell might.

In Africa, other blacks would have burned this thief alive after poking him around with their dull machetes for a bit.

I don’t want anything to do with these people. I’m not about that life. And yet, the nigger internet defense force wants me to accept both the boy-thief and the guards with whips into my country, where they can continue their cycle of thievery and lashing and uploading to the internet for likes from their huehuehue monkey countrymen.

various commenters #fundie incels.co

(Fuckcel)
[LifeFuel] Man beats a woman to death in public and no one tries to stop him [NSFW]

(Stanx22)
Men would kill women if it wasn't for sex.

(Suicel)
Excellent.

(Virginp0wers)
wtf that was so random too, they were just like talking and then he fucking beats her to death.

insane normies are very strange to me, its like a switch flips in their heads.

(SupremeG)
Beating up people is low IQ.

(mylifeistrash)
beating up women is high IQ as fuck

(refmd)
seems like a bad idea in china, they already have a population imbalance of males.

(gstvtrp)
personaliteehee

(E.C.C.O)
Knew it'd be in China before I entered the thread. Reminds me of that video where some Chinese guy just starts kerbstomping a 4 year old for no reason.

(Akarin)
No, that's just China. Liveleak is full of Chinese videos where they just don't give a fuck when someone was beaten, ran over or just died in some random way.

(_incelinside)
Lmao fucking sociopaths

.
.
.

Dis some research on this. The reason people don't want to help is to avoid being scammed, if you help someone in china they can easily blame you for hurting them and you will be forced to pay alot compensation

(KV3)
Killing people is wrong but she probably left him for white Chad or Chang

(RREEEEEEEEE)
This. She most likely announced she was seeing Chang or something, otherwise I don't see a reason for him to flip out.

(Pasteleiro)
It's basically against the law to intervine in those situations. In China, you should let people lay down and die. Trying to be a good samaritan can cause you a penalty or even time in prison.

(RREEEEEEEEE)
Asians are high T.

(hehe xd)
thats just overpopulated distressed chinks, avg chink is soyboy level T in the west

LeftistsToTheLions #fundie reddit.com

[OP of "Repeal the 8th Amendment."]

If we're serious about confronting the leftist problem, we have to be serious about physical removal. And, because we're fun guys, we can have fun solutions to annoying problems.

The 8th amendment prohibits us from having more entertaining ways of eliminating criminals, especially as one as lifeless, law-unabiding, and generally just terrible all-around as today's leftist. Frankly, I've always wondered what an m80 shoved up a traitor's ass would look like and I'm sure you're curious too.

On that note, all partisan, true-believing leftists are terrorists. Basically if the ruling cabal likes 'em then they're not good, easy rule to follow IMO.

On this note, I know tensions are high right now but please don't do anything drastic and please remain calm. Do not break the law. Instead, go for the long-term and let's change the law. I understand that it is easy to be heated when a certain political faction wants to white out the entire white race, but play the long game and let's ensure what ALL these bastards get in the end is a bunch of hilarious, educational, and entertaining videos on liveleak, cleanly and legally.

Gen Z is the path forward. "Fash" 'em up and we get our Shangri-Las, the mother earth fattened up by the blood of the wicked.

ZP_NS #fundie reddit.com

(concerning the Australian government blocking access to 4chan, 8chan, and LiveLeak after the Christchurch mosque shootings. Bolding is the submitter's)

fuck anyone who censors anything. This is a bigger terrorist attack than the actual shooting

Brian Niemeier #fundie brianniemeier.com

Leading fast food chain Chick-Fil-A dismayed its largely Christian customer base earlier this week by announcing that they would no longer make charitable donations to the Salvation Army and the Fellowship of Christian Athletes. This announcement evoked much gloating from the Death Cult, since both charities adhere to correct Christian doctrine on sodomy.

Chick-Fil-A's decision was stupid for a number of reasons, not the least of which being that giving the Death Cult an inch only encourages them to demand a mile.

[...]

More importantly, caving to the Cult undermines the reason why Chick-Fil-A has thrived while other major brands like McDonald's have hit a rough spot.

McDonalds' enjoyed explosive growth in the second half of the 20th century because of their child-centric marketing. Little Timmy would see a McDonald's commercial on Saturday morning and pester his dad to buy him some nuggies, fries, and a cheap plastic toy. Dad would grab a Big Mac while he was there. It was a classic loss lead-upsell strategy, and it worked.

What happened to McDonald's? Demographic decline. After the Baby Boom, each generation has had successively fewer children. They tried roping adults in directly with the Dollar Menu, but instead of buying a $1 burger and adding higher-margin sides, customers just bought three $1 burgers.

By contrast, Chick-Fil-A appealed to the only people who are still having kids--Christians. This is a demographic that's already fed up with being villified and ignored. Spurning its core customers' beliefs while taking them for granted is a recipe for disaster.

Luckily for them, Chick-Fil-A seems to have reached the same conclusion.

[...]

Chick-Fil-A's renunciation of Satan's empty promises should encourage Christians. We are still a majority, and we still have power to consecrate the world to God, if only we heed Christ's command not to fear the world's wrath.

Anyway, no good deed should go unrewarded. I advise showing solidarity with those who share your values by partaking of the Lord's Chicken tonight.

And by buying my pulse-pounding military thriller Combat Frame XSeed now!

Professor Suad Saleh #fundie inquisitr.com

A female professor from the renowned Al-Azhar University in Cairo, Egypt, says that Muslim men are allowed by Allah to rape non-Muslim women in order to “humiliate” them. Professor Suad Saleh made the bold claims while being interviewed on Al-Hayat TV. The professor says that the rape is allowed during times of “legitimate war” between Muslims and their enemies.

LiveLeak posted the startling video which shows the interview of the Islamic female professor Suad Saleh as she spoke on Al-Hayat TV. In the video, Suad Saleh is seemingly trying to discourage the purchase of slaves from Asian countries for sexual purposes. Instead, she says that Allah has given the Muslim men a way to have sexual relations with slave women that is “legitimate.” Saleh suggests that the only time it is acceptable for Muslim men to enslave a woman for sexual purposes is during a “legitimate war” between Muslims and their enemies such as that with Israel. Therefore, the female Islamic professor says that enslaving Israeli women and raping them would be entirely acceptable and encouraged.

In the video transcript provided by The Middle East Media Research Institute, Professor Suad Saleh says that slavery existed before Islam and anyone could trade “freeborn men and women” which was the equivalent to human organ trade. However, she says Islam put slavery “into order” by regulating when slavery was allowed. Saleh claims that Islam clearly defines when slavery is allowed and when it isn’t. She says the only “legitimately-owned slaves come from among prisoners from a war.” Therefore, she says Muslim men currently taking women from East Asia for sexual purposes are acting against Allah and against the Islamic faith. Instead, she says these men should be taking female prisoners of war for sexual purposes as a means to humiliate them.

“The female prisoners of wars are ‘those whom you own.’ In order to humiliate them, they become the property of the army commander, or of a Muslim, and he can have sex with them just like he has sex with his wives.”

AlbertPike33 #racist stormfront.org

I would say it started in 1863 when President Lincoln started arming blacks to kill White Southrons.

"Reconstruction" (1869-1877) was the next blow against Whites.

From 1878 til the mid 1960s things were more or less under control again.

The race riots of the 60s were battles of the race war.

The LA riots of 1992 were a battle in the race war, just ask Reginald Denny.

Things have intensified even more since then, especially with the whole Trayvon Martin thing.

Things are coming to a head, I'm just glad I live in the hills with almost ZERO blacks, the cities will become worse war zones than they already are.

If George Zimmerman is acquitted, and I think he will be, that will be the spark that sends the whole ****house up in flames.

Today Christian #fundie todaychristian.net

Some Questions Atheist Cannot Truly and Honestly REALLY Answer! Which leads to some interesting conclusions…

1. How Did You Become an Atheist?

2. What happens when we die?

3. What if you’re wrong? And there is a Heaven? And there is a HELL!

4. Without God, where do you get your morality from?

5. If there is no God, can we do what we want? Are we free to murder and rape? While good deeds are unrewarded?

6. If there is no god, how does your life have any meaning?

7. Where did the universe come from?

8. What about miracles? What all the people who claim to have a connection with Jesus? What about those who claim to have seen saints or angels?

9. What’s your view of Dawkins, Hitchens and Harris?

10. If there is no God, then why does every society have a religion?

mighyt_yt #racist stormfront.org

*On potential riots after the Zimmerman trial*

Where I live I don't expect riots to occur. But none the less I always carry a handgun in my vehicle. Out of the Rodney King riots the one scene that stands out in my mind the most is Reginald Denney being dragged from his truck and busted in the head with a brick as the negro danced a jig and laughed. So the ability to protect ones self while in a car/truck is essential. My house is too secluded to be in danger I believe. I keep a stockpile of food and water so I'm alright on that. But now the people living in big cities like Miami, Atlanta, New Orleans, Chicago, Detroit, etc. Ya'll better prepare to stay inside and not leave home for at least a week. If you do have to travel try to take a route that doesn't go anywhere near black areas and keep the handgun within easy reach. I predict that this is going to get ugly. The prosecution has not proven it's case by a longshot and in my opinion an aquittal or at least a hung-jury is inevitable. Remember what John Bernard Books said, "Some people hesitate or draw a breath before they pull the trigger, I won't." If you are threatened don't take the chance of being killed because you are afraid of going through what Zimmerman is going through. Better to be tried than died. If you are stopped on the street by force and they try to open your car door shoot the living s*** out of them.

Gutierrez #fundie christianforums.com

It makes a difference because of cultural cohesion and the definition of nationhood. I think biblically speaking, it's pretty clear that racial segregation (not animosity) was begun and used by God, represents the natural 'order', if you will, and is a pretty positive thing overall. That said, I'm not condemning anyone who chooses to miscegenate. Again, I'm just concerned about the vilification of those who --for biblically and philosophically sound reasons--oppose it.

CH #fundie heartiste.wordpress.com

The Fake News Media menstruates over Trump’s “lies” but what they don’t see is that their agenda is driven by psychological projection of their own Big Lies onto Trump, who has committed the sin of telling Big Truths, which is a crucifix and garlic to the vampires of the media who traffic in pushing a decades-old Narrative that defies reality and sucks the lifeblood of healthy, humanized nationhood.

Trump’s very existence — and by extension the existence of an Army of Shitlords who voted for him — is a corporeal rebuke to the Lords of Lies. As I’ve written, Trump’s hyperbole is on the level of little fibs meant to drive his foes over the edge of sanity, exposing their inherent extremism, a provocation to which they dutifully comply. But in the world of Real News, Trump tells Big Truths, which daily reminds media whores that they sacrificed their integrity to tell Big Lies to push an agenda driven by self-fluffing fealty to their elitism.

The media are adept in telling Little Truths — adherence to semantics and trivial “fact checks” that hide more than they illuminate — to cloak themselves in the garb of trustworthiness and to conceal their real purpose as manipulators of consensus, but Big Truths like the kind Trump tells every day expose Big Lies to bleaching sunlight, which explains the incoherent rage of the media, deep state, and uniparty.

They can’t stand that Trump effortlessly and routinely belies their pretensions and exposes their malevolence simply by “telling it like it is”.

Trump tells more stone cold truth in a few days than the Globohomo Establishment — media, deep state, bureaucracy, academia, entertainment — tell in their miserable lives.

And that is why they hate him.

NelsonB #conspiracy news.yahoo.com

Hillary attended a rose garden ceremony and stood next to Vince Foster the day of his murder! The ceremony was for the new FBI director, Louis Freeh. What about the pictures of Foster at the White House before his murder there?
Is this a first ? A man is killed and the media does not discuss the evidence, the films! What did Hillary look like before destroying Foster's files and planting the fake "suicide" note in his brief case?
The new FBI Director misdirected the many investigations of Foster's murder away from the films of himself and Foster and Hillary! Freeh also hired journalists to protect Hillary.
The media agreed not to discuss the films of Hillary and Foster; in addition, the media agreed not to mention that Fort Marcy Park (where the secret service brought the body from the White House) is about a mile from CIA Headquarters on Chain Bridge Road.
Books and articles have been written about Foster's murder that protect Hillary by not including these important facts.
Three handwriting experts, including Oxford University, Emeritus Professor, Reginald Alton (now banned from Wikipedia to protect Hillary claims Oxford University, no wiki for Reggi or Wiki Reggie), found the "suicide" note to be a fake. See Reuters October 25, 1995 "Foster note a Fake".

Robert #fundie americanandproud.net

[Prop 8 supporter]

The other day I was on my way home from work and I saw a couple of “FAGGOTS” holding signs in front of Harvest that said “Hypocrites repent” I turned around and was on my way to confront the “opposing view point” when another like minded individual beat me to it, the next thing I saw was a broken sign flying across the road, and a few “faggots” running like little girls to a slumber party. Sometimes a little violence goes a long way in preventing MORE problems later.

We have been inundated with protests and destruction of property for voting to protect marriage. WE the people are about to face yet another challenge to our will. The “Faggot” community is extremely confident that they will win these law suits, and IF that happens I am prepared to MARCH on Sacramento with ANY organization or movement. This is a watershed moment. NOT for the “FAGGOTS”, but for the people of California and the Nation.

WE THE PEOPLE Voted in favor of traditional marriage, WE THE PEOPLE voted to define marriage as ONE MAN AND ONE WOMAN. WE THE PEOPLE OF CALIFORNIA VOTED BY 52.7% to 47.3% to honor traditional marriage ONLY, and to NOT recognize same sex marriage. PERIOD…. AGAIN!

We the people did not vote to remove “Same Sex Partnership” rights.You “faggots” still have the same rights as being married, you are just denied the right to use the term “Marriage” to describe your “lifestyle choice” Cry me a river…

Reginald Genovese #fundie iambilly.wordpress.com

Now we may all sit back relax, and watch the detruction of the Vermont economy. Governor Douglas’s position is the right one: he knows that allowing rights to perverts, law-breakers who falsify civil law, break criminal law, and disobey God’s law, will destroy the economy of not only his state but also our nation.

Ten years ago the supreme court of Vermont ruled that the state must allow civil unions for perverted residents who want to live in sin before the eyes of God. Five years ago it was predicted that this would lead to perverted marriage in five years and the destruction of America’s economy. Lo and behold, God’s prediction has come to pass.

I lament for what used to be my country. We must return to God’s law: the Constitution of the United States and the Declaration of Independence. Our Christian founders, bathed in the holy blood of our Savior, created the potential for a perfect Republic. But perverts and the Democrat party have derailed our Republic and the Republican Party. We must return to God’s Law or become a colony of true Christian nations. It will happen unless we change.

This change includes obeying law. Including God’s law. We need no longer stone perverts, but we cannot allow them to endanger our country.

Allobitch #fundie pragneto.tumblr.com

(Certain people on tumblr have begun calling their opponents RAT's)

Actually, I just had Radical Assimilationist, and was suggested Cishet Apologists and Cishet Lovers by an anon, and Radically Oppression Tolerant, Radical Inclusive Assimilationist, and then Radical Assimilative Tolerant by @lgbtkhaleesi.

Radical: trying to change the fundamental nature of the LGBT community.

Assimilative: Pretty self-explanatory. You guys want to include most people into the community, expanding it to straight people, therefore assimilate it into straight society.

Tolerant: Of cis straight people and the oppression they inflict on us.