(Reminder that Tatsuya Ishida is also Anti-Porn as part of his being a TERF and misandrist / female supremacist.)
Your future is 10 tiny houses per 1/4 acre lot on a borderless planet with 50 billion Africans. But don't worry goyim, once a year there will still be games and prizes. #BlackFriday
[On the poisoning of Sergei and Yulia Skripal.]
[On the poisoning of Sergei and Yulia Skripel.]
[On the poisoning of Sergei and Yulia Skripal.]
[Note: This is directed at a black victim of female genital mutilation]
In the name of God
The Most Merciful, The Most Compassionate
To: His Excellency, Mr. António Guterres
The secretary-general of the United Nations
Again Greetings and best regards, and fresh wishes for your success in fulfilling
the heavy responsibilities in that organization
You are informed that the use of biologic means, including the recent and wide-
scale release of coronavirus (COVID-19) as a new weapon for establishing and/or
maintaining political and economic upper hand in the global arena, by some
domineering powers, has caused worries among the public in nations, and further
distortion in the security of the world people.
Feeling responsible vis-à-vis the spread and depth of the unprecedented material
and intangible damages caused by this imposed war and invasion against
humanity, made me present the statement of the problem:
Nowadays, it is clear to the world people that the mutated and intelligent
coronavirus 2019, was produced in laboratories, and more clearly put, by the
warfare stock houses of biologic war belonging to world hegemonic powers, and is
much more anti-human„ destructive and horrible than the other anti-human
weapons such as the nuclear and chemical ones, as well as Harp.
As the Secretary-General of the United Nations, you are expected to:
Strongly slam the anti-human action by world criminal powers in imposing
the biologic war on nations, aimed at domineering, and don't allow the
perpetrators of such crimes realize their political-economic crimes and evil
plans and avert justice and penalty through the United Nations, by white
washing their crimes.
With special scrutiny, identify the elements involved in the production and
use of biologic weapons, and strictly penalize them at worldwide scale.
Indifference and lack of serious and effective confrontation with them, can
ruin the relations among countries and nations, and threaten seriously the
existence of nations.
A plan to modify and reinforce the convention on the ban on production and
use of biologic weapons, aimed at prohibiting any form of research, and
establishing laboratories for production, stockpiling and use of any form of
biologic weapons at any scale of effect, be drafted and submitted to the UN General Assembly. The foreseeing of executive measures for effective/strict
supervision and control, and penalizing any move in that direction, via the
transparent and responsible participation of all governments and nations,
needs to be on top of the agenda.
The World Health Organization (WTO) needs to be obliged to strictly
identify the above-said laboratories, as well as the elements involved in the
use of viruses such as Corona, and introduce thetn to the world community.
Nowadays, with the rising awareness among nations, and the increasing desire for
unity and cooperation for achieving freedom, justice, dignity, welfare, progress and
prosperity, the dominance of Devilish/anti-human powers has been isolated and for
sure, their reliance on mass killing weapons and their perpetration of anti-human
crimes, not only doesn't open up the way for their escape, but also speeds up the
end to their massive oppression.
I hereby assure everyone that in near future, and with the joining together of
the rivers of nations, and with the advent of The Perfect Human, who is the
humans' friend, guide and loving one, the true power of nations will emerge,
and hegemony will be uprooted, and the glorious day of the birth and
complete establishment of humanity, and the era of the grand manifestation
of God's grandeur, and characteristics, names and humanity will start.
I pray to God the Almighty, for your prosperity, and that of all free-thinkers
and those who subscribe to the dignity, security and excellence of the human
Former President of the Islamic Republic of Iran
(contains an image of very young juvenile characters dancing and proclaiming themselves TERFs, including one character outlining her ovaries.)
imageGrand Inquisitor: “Are you or have you ever been a member of the TERF Party?”
(depicts people against TERFs as a faceless zombie horde struck down by the omnipotent author avatar simply shouting “Tut!” at them.)
(Yes, this is the Sinfest guy)
[ on a post telling pedos to stay away from kids ]
Teachers can go into schools. People can go to the park during the day to have a picnic. I don’t think kissing or cuddling kids is okay, but a lot of “no contact” pedophiles seem to beg to differ so I added it.
Yeah as do I, like I said in my other reblog of this. And to your other response, it’s not about legality. It’s ok to cuddle (and cuddling doesn’t neccesarily mean in bed) with a kid we like, because, as long as it’s not anything harmful, we can do ANYTHING non pedophiles can do. As long as the child isn’t aware of our feelings, it’s exactly the same to them, therefore not harmful.
Really? Because my therapist told me something along the lines not to trust someone who has the pedophile heart as a cover and thinks looking at child porn is gross and thinks the whole MAP community is actively dangerous. You know that heart’s associated with child grooming right? Of course you do. You take a lot of inspiration from chomos
People wrongfully associate the heart with pro contact, it’s girl love in general, I use it to show my appreciation for young girls, because it’s NOT just a sexual attraction, so I would never hurt them. Trust me, your therapist is in the minority when it comes to professionals who specialize in this stuff. The anti community, with their suicide baiting and death threats, are much more dangerous than us. I didn’t say I HAD to. I’m saying if the opportunity presented itself, there’s absolutely no reason I should decline. If no kid has wanted to cuddle with you, well it’s your loss. Maybe shows you the kind of person you are. Let me tell you a few stories. One time I was staying at a friend’s house, and he was dating a girl who had a 4yo daughter, and for a few nights while she was there, she got out of her bed, and onto the couch with me. Did ask, didn’t know me. And I simply enjoyed the cuddle, wasn’t tempted even a little to do more. In the morning the first time, her mom said, “Yeah she doesn’t like sleeping alone.” Another time at a family get together, my 2nd cousin, who also didn’t know me very well, layed on the couch next to me while watching tv. While I had my arm around the 4yo because of the “in bed” setting and how young she was, so it was appropriate, I didn’t touch my 2nd cousin, because she was older and didn’t know her well and the setting wasn’t appropriate. And finally, at another friend’s house, he had two daughters who likes to periodically sit on my lap while at my computer. So as you see, it happens, non of it was instigated by me, therefore perfectly fine, and non predatory. It’s YOU’RE responsibility to educate yourself, and have an open, non bigoted mind. The majority of CSA is committed by situational offenders that get off on power and control, not the children themselves, not pedophiles. It’s a real statistic, look it up. We’re just as safe for children as anyone else. You’re fighting an ignorant, losing battle.
You’re sick. It’s not ignorant or bigoted to tell you to keep your hands off children you’re attracted to. It’s fucking depraved that you think what you’re doing is okay. Stop being a chomo and you’ll get less hate? Does he know you’re attracted to his daughters?
Of course not because he’d probably overreact just like everyone else does. Whether or not people know is irrelevant. Why? Because in the end, the situation is exactly the same as if a non pedo was in it. My feelings are my own business and don’t effect anyone else.
I see a lot of blogs saying maps don’t need therapy and are perfectly fine the way they are. Shouldn’t this be something that needs to stop?
And then there’s people like me. And I’m going to get hate for this, but I don’t care. If there was a “cure” I wouldn’t take it, and would rather die than it be forced on me. Why? Because A) I know for a FACT I will NEVER offend. My desire not to harm young girls is greater than my desire for them. And B) What Antis seem to fail to understand, is it’s not just sexual, it’s attraction in general. I love being able to appreciate the beauty of young girls, the way they look as well as the way they act, in a way most other people don’t. If I was “cured” I would feel like the world has gone from color, to black and white. Dull and grey. They make me smile, in a non sexual way.
RE: I’m sick of being mistaken for my biracial children’s nanny
If the mudshark baby can pass for white, it's another Sandra Laing situation waiting to happen in a few generations.
No it won't. It's obvious these kids aren't fully white based on eyes and hair texture.
Sandra Laing's mother was a filthy mudshark. It is so obvious Sandra is a mulatto. There has NEVER been a DNA test to this day to prove that white guy was her father. Only a blood typing test was done. The white woman lucked out that her white husband and negro lover shared the same blood type.
When they hit puberty they will look totally Nonwhite, and the daughter, atleast, will hate it. The mother will probably hate it too.
White man threw away his genes, for "companionship" and a housemaid.
Based on other articles this oriental has written he married a feminist author more obsessed with her social media than being a mom.
Oriental women turn into demanding shrews after marriage that make white feminists seem demure.
And I'm sick of white men that marry and have children with Asian women. There is a special place in hell for white nordic males that breed with asian women or any non white women. He threw away his genes and destroyed his European bloodline.
Half Asian children always grow up to look weird even if they kind of look white or less Asian than you think they would. The Asian look always comes out when they get older.
When they hit puberty they will look totally Nonwhite, and the daughter, atleast, will hate it. The mother will probably hate it too.
White man threw away his genes, for "companionship" and a housemaid.
Very true. I knew a woman who is half Japanese. Her shrewish mother hated her because every time she looked at her she saw a female who was whiter than her. She hates herself.
Eurasians usually turn out looking like space aliens. At least with mulattos most of the time they just look like regular although lightly fairer complexioned Black people.
I'm sick of biracial children period. Their parents should be.. I better stop now.
Me me me me me woe is me. It's all about her and her petty whining. I hate these types of articles. Get over yourself you navel gazing, narcissistic Chinese. The only people who have the time for this tripe are snot nosed Jews and virtue signalling white liberals in the universities and the media.
Sandra Laing's father did a DNA test at the time and it was proven he was the birth father. Her brothers also were high yellow but light enough to pass for white. They accepted her until she got with a Bantu.
At some point that black gene is going to pop out AGAIN.
It wasn't a DNA test. Those didn't even exist back then. It was a blood type test. That was considered acceptable for paternity back then. Women didn't whore around with multiple men back then and if the father's blood type (A,B,O) was an appropriate match, case closed.
Let me reiterate. IT WAS NOT A DNA test. One has never been done to this day.
That maybe. But that still does not refute the examples I gave about the mulattoes.
Eartha Kitt is half white. Her daughter is a quarter black having a German father. She looks white and is a natural blonde. She married a non-black (I think he's a Jew), and her kids look White. Maya Rudolph is a mulatto, married a white guy, and her kids look white.
That black gene is going to come back at some point down the line.
Even if the Black gene doesn't pop out again, mt haplogroup L like continue on indefinitely regardless of how hard they try to breed up. That's assuming Etha Kitts's mother was Black, which in this case, I hope it was her father that was Black, not the other way around! Otherwise, we now have White looking females with mt haplogroup L, exactly what we don't want!
My stand on bi-racial people is that when forced to choose, by default they take the race of the parent of the same gender. This based on the transmission of mt and Y haplogroups.
For instance, a bi-racial male with a White father, or a bi-racial female with a White mother can produce arguably assimilable offspring with a fully White spouse. Not an ideal scenario and the kids would likely not be considered White. However, the non-White DNA could be breed out eventually. Therefor such bi-racial people would be a low priority for removal from White society.
On the other hand, a bi-racial male with a fully non-White father or a bi-racial female with a non-White mother is fully NON-WHITE and NOT assimilable! It should be illegal for a bi-racial female with a non-White mother and non-White mt haplogroup to marry a White man. Someone like Magan Markle as an example.
The late boxer Muhammad Ali/Cassius Clay has white - looking grandson. Cassius Clay is a part mulatto and had several wives ( all are black/mulatto women). One of his daughters had lighter skin than either parent and that daughter married a white man. Hence a white looking grandson:
This is why I it is dangerous to rally whites with "if it looks white it must be white". Especially when it comes to "White Latin American" people. I don't trust them until I see a DNA test. They are so mixed, even the white looking ones could be very mixed.
Race is about genes and not just physical looks. Some people are sacrificing the genes that created the west for physical attributes alone.
NY Times: Former SS Member, on Trial in Germany, Says He Was ‘Morally Complicit’ at Auschwitz
The Anti-New York Times
This story went un-rebutted by The Anti-New York Times because your sensitive reporter here gets too emotionally rattled upon learning of these sad cases of 90+ year old SS heroes being legally terrorized for an event that never happened. E-mails from the usual ignoramuses trickled into the inbox: “Hey asshole. Even this ex-SS man now admits that there were gas chambers. I suppose you think he made it all up? Eat shit, Nazi!”
Why even respond to such demoniacally demented drones?
But when some loyal supporters wrote in, expressing worry and confusion over Oskar Groning's "confession", and writing to the effect: “Mike, What does this mean? I don’t get it. Why would Groning say this?” - it was time to rebut the rubbish, and issue it as a “Free Sample Day”.
Friends! Any defense attorney worth a nickel would be engaging in extreme legal malpractice if he were to advise his SS client to say anything other than what Groning said; which is, “I am so sorry.” Seriously people, can you imagine what Merkel’s Marxist minions would do to this poor man if he were to compound his “crime” with the additional “crime” of “Holocaust Denial”, in a courtroom in occupied Germany, no less? Herr Groning’s only shot at enjoying a few years of liberty is to grovel and admit that the “gas chambers” existed.
Oh ye dear readers of weak faith! Stay away from the Devil’s Loudspeaker (TV). Take heed of the admonition from the 1973 classic film ‘The Exorcist’. Recall the scene in which Father Merrin, the senior priest, sternly cautions the younger, inexperienced Father Karras to avoid engaging in any debate or conversation with the devil that is possessing the little girl. Here is the line:
“Especially important is the warning to avoid conversations with the demon. We may ask what is relevant but anything beyond that is dangerous. He is a liar. The demon is a liar. He will lie to confuse us. But he will also mix lies with the truth to attack us. The attack is psychological, Damien, and powerful. So don’t listen to him. Remember that - do not listen.”
Be he physical or metaphorical, this is how the Devil operates, by mixing truth with lies; and sowing the seeds of confusion where there shouldn't be any confusion at all. Unfortunately for Father Karras, he allowed the words of the cunning demon to get into his head and rattle him, with tragic consequences for both priests. And that is what happened to the few beloved fans who sent in those concerned E-mails so suddenly filled with doubt, all on the basis of this hyped-up Groning story.
The Exorcist teaches us to not even listen to demons.The same applies to the Marxist TV, new-sites & newspapers. Turn them off before the lie gets into your head!
In keeping with today’s spiritual theme, it is time for a quick “booster blessing” of truth from your journalistic Exorcist here at The Anti-New York Times.
The WikiPedia entry for the Holocaust- TM sums up the official story very well. In a nutshell:
“From early 1942 until late 1944, transport trains delivered Jews to the camp’s gas chambers from all over German-occupied Europe, where they were killed with the pesticide Zyklon B. At least 1.1 million prisoners died at Auschwitz, around 90 percent of them Jewish”
You see, we are expected to believe that 1.1 million people (officially and suspiciously reduced from the 4 million that had been claimed for 50 years!) were herded into a “gas chamber” the size of a 3-car garage, then killed by bug-spray (Zyklon B), right under the noses of Red Cross camp inspectors, while inmate soccer games were going on in an adjacent field. The hard-working killers (or their slaves) then had to enter the poison room (perhaps wearing HazMat suits?), pick up each dead body one at a time, and then feed them one-by-one into a funeral parlor sized oven for cremation. Whatever happened to that famed German efficiency?
There is so much impossibly wrong with this Fairy Tale scenario that entire books have been written to scholarly debunk the moronic madness that is Holocaust Mania. But let us just briefly focus on a single aspect of this fraudulent fable we irreverently refer to as “The Holohoax”; namely, the numerical logistics. This piece is a good “starter” for that special person in your life who could use a good “exorcism”.
Let's have a look at the “gas chambers”:
Now, lets have a look at a typical, sold-out NFL football stadium:
Met Life Stadium (New Jersey / home of the NY Jets & NY Giants)
1,100,000 / 82,000 = 13.4 football stadiums full of people “gassed” in a 3-car garage.
A ‘Baker’s Dozen’ full of NFL stadiums, “gassed” in small increments in a room that looks like this....
Excuse us, dear reader. We’ll be right back....
OK. We’re back. Here is another illustration of this point, in side-by-side approximated scale for just one stadium:
Fit the stadium population into that “gas chamber” ....13.4 TIMES!
And just imagine; for 50 years they got away with telling us that it was 50 stadiums! (below)
After people started asking questions, the HoloHoaxers dropped the 4 million down to 1.5 million, and now it is officially down to 1.1 million. It’s still a lie!
Let's kill this lie! Please share this piece far and wide.
[LifeFuel] Imperial Japanese Army was a testimony to the toughness of incels
I believe many of you WW2cels or even incels have heard of the country Japan, but did y'all know that outside of anime it was one of the most fierce, violent and brutal country around?
The IJA was the army of incels - they would take terrorrity of the enemy and ascend through the means of questionable means.
The average japanese serviceman looked like that
The IJA taken part in many battles against the western countries, which mogged them (even worse back then), Russia was demolished by the Japanese and so did UK, Netherlands, France and even USA.
The average Japanese soldier back in the past was 5'3 and weighed only 115 pounds, compared to Americans of 5'8 and 145 pounds.
Despite losing out on the end, the toughness of the Japanese shown. The Americans had to face an extremely fierce enemy and paid costly for every island they took from the Japanese.
The Japanese would literally do 'special attacks' aka suicide attacks, crashing planes on bombers, charging straight to machine guns, suicide with grenades and put TNT on tanks and use them as explosive go-karts.
I think WW2 Japanese is a testimony to what incels can achieve as a whole, and can be a fierce enemy despite lack of height and appearance.
Reptilian caught at Nancy Reagans funeral?
Look at this picture of GHWB and HC at Nancy's funeral. Now look at the woman in the background. What ya think? Shadow's causing it? Doesn't look like shadows to me.
[Species] appear fully-formed with no evidence they evolved, period.
The entire evolutionary history of these species doesn't exist. And, evolutionists have are lame excuses that they can't even agree on why the fossil evidence is missing.
This fatal problem to all but those that want to have blind faith in theory that should have been discarded decades ago:
"The abrupt appearance of higher taxa in the fossil record has been a perennial puzzle. Not only do characteristic and distinctive remains of phyla appear suddenly, without known ancestors, but several classes of a phylum, orders of a class, and so on, commonly appear at approximately the same time, without known intermediates." *James W. Valentine and *Cathryn A. Campbell, "Genetic Regulation and the Fossil Record," in American Scientist Vol. 63, November-December, 1975, p. 673.
The order in which fossils are found in the Cambrian also contradicts the theory of evolution:
"The actual percentage of areas showing this progressive order from the simple to the complex is surprisingly small. Indeed formations with very complex forms of life are often found resting directly on the basic granites. Furthermore, I have in my own files a list of over 500 cases that attest to a reverse order, that is, simple forms of life resting on top of more advanced types." Walter E. Lammert, Growing Doubts: Is Evolutionary Theory Valid? p. 4.
BTW, evolutionists are notorious form naming the same species something different at various stages of history:
"Dr. Eldredge [American Museum of Natural History, New York City] was asked, `Do paleontologists name the same creatures differently when they are found in different geological periods?' He replied that this happens, but they are mistakes. When asked the same question, Dr. Patterson [British Museum, London] replied, `Oh, yes, that's very widely done.' Next he was asked, 'That doesn't seem quite honest. You wouldn't do that, would you?' He said that he hoped he wouldn't . .
Would not this practice make a lot more species? Dr. Raup [Chicago Museum] said it would; perhaps 70 percent of the species described [in the fossil rocks] are later found to be the same as existing species, so 70 percent of the new species named should not have been [given new names but were], either through ignorance or because of the ground rules used by the taxonomists." L.D. Sunderland, Darwin's Enigma (1988), pp. 130-131.
"An assistant of Dr. Eldredge, who was studying trilobite fossils at the American Museum, explained to the author how he made the decision on naming a new species: `I look at a fossil for about two weeks and then if I think it looks different enough, I give it a new name.' So it is simply a matter of judgment with no firm ground rules." Op. cit., p. 131.
2060, white women, naturally endowed with the perfect balance of billowing bossoms, curvy hips, brimming w/ femininity, will now undergo asiafication surgery at coming of age bc white men, now all intimidated by the adult female body due to androgen loss & porn social engineering
[Note: This is being shared by another tweeter, the creators of these two images may not be the same person.]
What you actually believe vs what you write on your papers when the professor is liberal.
This is real folks. An Alt-Right, Pro Nazi Sonic account.
(Emphasis shows parts of text in the image highlighted by OP)
IT unironically thinks that only females can be incel due to their looks
Really? The old "you should smile more, you'd be prettier!" Is what we're going with here? That's no better than what sexist men say to women.
Femcels have flaws in their ideology, but they are right about the fact that they receive more abuse for their looks. There's plenty of science on the subject. For example, there was even a study done showing that unattractive people receive harsher sentences in court. Not to mention unattractive girls who smile can and often are still unattractive. They can have bad teeth or weird shaped mouths. Femcels were often very sweet and quiet as children. Their personalities are not the problem. Unattractive people just get bullied and treated badly regardless of their personality. Unattractive people deserve proper representation. I'm frankly tired of seeing super attractive actors play supposedly "ugly duckling" characters, or ugly cartoon characters drawn more attractive too.
Imagine thinking a group of people who can literally have sex anytime they want within the span of 30 minutes on Tinder can be incel. So called "physically unattractive" females are still seen as sexually attractive by a gargantuan population of males, their looks play no meaningful impact on their ability to get laid. Males and females do not share the same reproductive neurological behavior patterns, you absolutely cannot compare unattractive females to unattractive males, their circumstances are entirely different.
Just because femcels are female, IT supports them and gives them a free pass to say whatever they want. IT could literally give them the same treatment they give us, where they use a small percentage of bait/venting posts as proof every single male incel is just like that and couldn't possibly be lonely due to being physically/genetically unattractive. IT uses a common reddit tactic where they will purposely only focus on the worst possible aspects of something to avoid the actual topic at hand. They know damn fucking well that looks are determined by your genetics and that its over for ugly males from conception, but they hate you and enjoy hating you.
Thing is that almost any woman can fraud 3-4 points with makeup. It’s honestly unfair.
makeup is easily detectable and looks unnatural.
girls say face doesnt matter but they paint their faces to make their eye area and facial structure look better
they genuinely think we are stupid
An average Becky is a variant of the femoid who is subordinate to the high-tier normie/Becky in terms of looks and social status. In its broadest sense, Beckys are a 3/10 to 7/10 on the decile system, ranging from ugly Becky to high-tier Becky.
Despite their lower position on the social totem pole, young Beckys will nonetheless ignore around 80% of men, including their looksmatches, unless said looksmatches happen to earn at least as much as she does. This sexual jockeying often puts them at odds with both each other as well as with Stacies, inciting fierce intrasexual competition and eating disorders. Although Beckys will gleefully fuck Chad, Beckys will often end up settling for a betabux Brad or a high-tier normie when she begins to approach the Wall or wants to raise a child, and hence fails to secure Chad.
Often Becky's try to navigate around their looksmatch by becoming a fake nerd. In the 2010s, nerd-dom became almost hip due to the rise of information technology, and therefore women now wanted to be apart of it. Though not for their looksmatch, but to get access to Chad engineers and wealthy start-up founders (see also women in STEM). Thus, we saw the rise of IM LIEK SUCH A NERD LOL.
Low self esteem
Most Beckys compensate at some point. Most average woman are terrified of the "average life", especially having to admit to their femoid friends that it is only average. Awkward! So they travel and go on ridicules spending sprees to prove their worth. Entire industries have formed around this societal and gynocentric ill (e.g. shopping malls and selfie stick manufacturers). This comes with bombarding their social media with pictures of food and lavish venues. They will also take photos of themselves with hot guys during vacations & parties to signal wealth and status. The most well known example of this phenomena is Anna Sorokin. Much of these kinds of confusion seem to stem from feminism pushing the notion that women need to and can do careers, as well as deteriorating monogamy norms and lax enforcement of social status allaround, but probably also a more globalized culture leading to fiercer social comparison against more people, as well as stagnating economies increasing competitiveness for high-income Chad.
Before porn, I wanted to get married one day. Now I want nothing to do with men in a sexual way because of the way I see men treat women in porn. It just makes me wonder if all men are like this, especially since most men watch porn. I hate pornography so much that it makes me feel like exploding. - The way female pornographic actresses are treated -The way sex is portrait as a form of dominance. - The cursing -The perversion of it all I HATE IT. It scarred my teenage brain, and I can never go back in time to undo that.
A lot of women find it degrading and humiliating to them. Several studies have examined the violence against women in porn and all have come up with numbers in the 80% range of porn videos that show violence in some form against women. The other frightening end of that spectrum is that fewer than 5% of these videos show women responding negatively to violence, the overwhelming response by women to violence is neutrality or pleasure.
I do not know the situations of the people involved. I have heard too many stories (both first hand and not) from too many people about actors getting the raw end of the deal. Even supposedly female friendly suicide girls really screws the women in the contracts. One example is the Suicide Girls. Supposedly feminist-friendly porn, yet still screws the girls in the contracts. In addition to money problems, I do not know if these people consented to doing this pornography and then even if they did consent to a degree, how much further were they pushed? How were they treated? And I can't get off and think all that at the same time. That would be disgusting for me
And i will never date a man that watches porn. I look at it as i would look on any other relationship dealbreaker. if he thinks so much of his freedom to consume porn, and doesnt value my thoughts and opinons on the matter, he is free to choose porn and wave goodbye to me. i want to be in a relationship with a human being that has respect and sensitivity for other human beings. I dont consider porn consumption to be an indication of a caring, sensitive individual. I would never 'put up' with anything that went against my core values to make anyone else happy.
regardless of wether it makes it virtually impossible to find a man to be with. Some things are important enough to me to take a stand on. i canot love or respect a man who wants to be all nice and caring with me, then slink off to furtively watch some obnoxious objectifying, dehumanising depictions of women as sex toys. i find that kind of duplicity to be almost schizotypal,. a split between the mans brain where he displays caring, equanimitous behaviour to a partner, then shuts that off to 'enjoy' watching depictions of other women as toys, to be used for sexual gratification. I find that ability to split his mind, quite disturbing. And creepy in the extreme.
I do believe that most men, not all, in this world, hate women. Like probably 70% of the population. It really scares me, that's why I want to be alone instead and never be with one. Men around the world (mostly in Africa, Asia and the Middle East) dominate women, they rape them and stone them to death, mutilate their bodies. Women are not even allowed o go school in some parts of the world, not allowed to drive, vote, speak up but just be slaves for men. It may not be in developed countries but globally, I do believe most men hate women.
Parents would abort female babies because they are unwanted, Not that many women are in politics, business, science, engineering, it's mostly men. You could say men are better and intelligent than women,thanks for the discouragement and stuff but it's not scientifically proven men are more smarter than women. Even on the Internet almost every man I've met thinks "women" + "kitchen." Even after this, I think most of them will call me cunt, slut, bitch.?
My views on porn have been posted elsewhere,.its a frustrating subject, because if someone is pro porn, then they will be entrenched in that position, no matter what points you endevour to show them.
-[on a 24 year old creeping on 14 year old girls]
I read through all the comments - people are talking such crap,
it’s illegal - so what? the question should be is it morally wrong?
& IT IS NOT MORALLY WRONG. people wrote she’s not mature or she’s emotionally and mentally not ready - that’s such crap. I’ve met girls in their twenties who are stupid and immature and who have no life experience, they were emotionally unbalanced and definitely not ready for a relationship.
Judge it biologically and historically:
If the girl had her period she’s biologically ready and historically speaking over a 100 years ago it was normal to marry at 12+ year old. All throughout history girls have been having sex from ages 8+ (even younger in some very rare cases). It’s only been considered abnormal in the last few decades. I have friends who’s grandmothers were married at 12. My great grandmother was 14 when she married a 28 year old. In both cases they bore many children and were perfectly happy healthy women.
this is such hypocritical bullshit, people say you can look but don’t touch. and than I read some saying “if she’s 18 its ok” - says who, WHO is dictating these rules?
There are girls who don’t reach puberty until they’re 17. So who would be considered more mature biologically, a girl who reached puberty at 9 and is than having sex at 13+ or a girl who hit puberty at 17 and is having sex a few months later??
I’m attracted to girls at that age range and there’s no shame in it, the only reason I wouldn’t act upon it is because I’d go to jail. For all you commenting here, if you were alive 100 years ago this discussion would not even exist. Just think about that.
& than I read more BS: people saying she doesn’t know what she want’s or she’s too young to decide for herself. That’s assumption and generalization. It is unfair to make such a sweeping generalization about every teen & frankly one of the main reasons they are immature and irresponsible (generally speaking) is because society treats teens like children and we don’t give them responsibilities.
Additionally anyone who says teen girls look like children and their physical bodies are still small - that’s another BS argument. I’ve seen girls as young as 10 who look like adults and I’ve seen females who are 18+ who look 10.
Just look at the porn industry; they make billions from the teen porn genre; some of the girls who are over 18+ look like children, (like: Kitty Jung, Amai liu, Gigi rivera, Marcela Rubita, Tiny tyler, Kobe Tai, Lucy Filipino, Little Cinderella, Anne Howe) to name a few.
Any argument which suggests it is morally wrong to be with a 14 year old is bound to be based on a sweeping generalization, or is culturally biased or is emotionally driven. basically;
USE SOME COMMON SENSE
The atheist worship at the altar of their rational thinking and the religious worship at the altar of a God made in their image both are demostrating positive ignorance. they think they know but know little.
Look at the history of rational thinking often referred to as social darwism and find out how destructive rational thinking can be when love is left out and replaced by rational thinking.
Capitalism and commnism were due to rational thinking and look how well these two economic idealogies have worked out for humankind.
Most wars are fought over rational thinking and religious beliefs.
SNOBama is not looking to start a race war. That's too small for his thinking which is the thinking of William Ayers and his harridan wife. SNOBama is looking to start a CLASS war on the level of the Russian or Cuban revolution. Group think. Keep in mind how much the left hates this country, the gangs of anarchists, wacko enviornmentalists, muslims, others who see the chance to have the last act for the utopia they want to create. Race war is minor thinking. There are much bigger sharks circling in the tank. He will wait until the entire nation is embroiled.
SNOBama is laying the foundation for class warfare right now. The entire administration is. Get the rich, the rich are unfair, stop the rich, take the profits from those businesses, everyone is cheating the poor. WHO is rich? Obviously it isn't only millionaires. It's everyone who gets dividend check from investments, has a business, lives in a nice house, drives a decent late model car. We had a Vietnamese CONGRESSMAN asking for an executive to commit suicide. How long before executions? SNOBama is on the television every day promoting his ideas of class warfare. The spearhead and foundation might be a race war, but he had much more in mind than that.
Tolkien and the Illuminati: The dark side of LOTR
Think of the great eye of Sauron, the all-seeing eye which symbolizes NWO and echelon surveillance. Think of Mellon, the password to get in the Moria, the name of an Illuminati and bankers' dynasty. Think of the semiotics surrounding the Dark Lord, think of the ambiguity of Gandalf (a wizard? Or an "incarnate angel», as stated Tolkien?), of the weird initiations of the hobbits, think of the compelling hunger for rings, jewels and of course bloodlines, not to mention the omnipresence of orcs, dragons and monsters, and you can easily guess that there is a dark side in Tolkien universe: and after all, isn't he a British gentleman? Let's not explore my devilish side, quipped once Hitchcock in France. Britain has been during all Victorian age and later a land of witchcraft, of golden dawns and of many occult societies of writers and researchers. There is nothing neutral in British pop culture. This is what makes her so fascinating and so efficiently working on the masses.
Yet the gigantic proportions of Tolkien success are not reassuring, and many researchers, not all Christians, seem to think that Tolkien was on the dark side of the force, even if he was a devout catholic and a presumably traditional mind; he could easily been manipulated by superior forces and sources. Curious and insane Narnia of his boring friend CS Lewis confirm this unfair assertion, with its creepy centaurs and talkative fauns, Lucifer courts, fake quests and sinister lion-god.
Of course we can say that Tolkien mainly denounces what he describes... But is that so sure? Was Tolkien a counter initiate, or was he a mere eye-opener, to take Sam's words in the cavern of Moria, whose message would have been distorted by the Illuminati who control media and video-game industry?
Talking of Moria, I know a place in Spain called Moria. It's in Santander, Cantabria, and it designates a cliff that serves as pasture. There are other curious names in Spain and northern Portugal which are related to Tolkien: Gondor, Gondomar... all connected to legendary and Celtic Galicia and Compostella, this magic and telluric road of the western initiates prior to Christianity. But what is the secret meaning of the Moria? Is it material, a metal, a source of rich, or a rare raw material? Ask Gandalf but don't dig too much:
The Dwarves tell no tale; but even as mithril was the foundation of their wealth, so also it was their destruction: they delved too greedily and too deep, and disturbed that from which they fled, Durin's Bane.
In his famous book upon the Illuminati and the mind control (and as Tolkien has inspired so many games and dungeons and dragons...), Fritz Springmeier writes of the Moria that it designates the hierarchy of the Illuminati! About the rings and the opus, he even writes:
Rings are also used to signify what activity the slave is doing, and what rank or level they are in the occult... Some Illuminati survivors are always looking for a ring. Rings play a significant part in the lives and programming of slaves. One section that is coding-programming found in J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings is "One Ring to rule them all, One Ring to find them, One Ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind then."
The lord of the rings is Sauron: so he is the main character; the heroes are labelled fellowship of the ring. So they depend on the ring. This is too Illuminati agenda. There is another key-word connecting Tolkien good guys to Illuminati: bloodlines. Aragorn, who wears the winged disc in the movie, descends from Isildur the sinner, and feels weak for that reason; but for that reason too he will be the king, a restorer of a new order - the fourth age. His strange wife, Arwen, a Jungian silhouette of his soul, will not be happy too to lose her immortality. But it is too late.
In the Silmarillion, Tolkien creates too an uncertain mythology and horror; he was so fond of his worlds that he designed during fifty years dynasties, genealogies, thus presenting the horrendous manipulations of Melkor:
There countless became the hosts of his beasts and his demons, and the race of the Orcs, bred long before, grew and multiplied in the bowels of the earth... and thus did Melkor breed the hideous race of the Orcs in envy and mockery of the Elves, of whom they were afterwards the bitterest foes.... This it may be was the vilest deed of Melkor, and the most hateful to Ilúvatar.
Orcs comes from Virgil's creation (Orcus, the death), a source too much ignored by the commentators (after all, Tolkien could speak fluently Latin, and Virgil wrote the best epic ever).The gloomy creation of Tolkien mixes now with our own brave new world made up of biotech and artificial breeding. Some conspiracy theorists could join Tolkien too in their descriptions of reptilian-like persons and leaders (think of the name of Sauron). We can also say that the pagan gods of Tolkien behave like the dei otiosi of Mircea Eliade, the lazy gods who have retired from this world and who are omnipresent in primitive mythologies. They have abandoned us, hastening the despair of great Noldor leader Feanor.
Some others will notify that Tolkien defends a wrong dualistic conception (which is somewhat Manichean, I mean, strictly heretical from a Christian point of view) of the world with a powerful source of evil, sometimes superior to the good one. The progressive and implacable destruction of the middle-earth in the Silmarillion (named after the jewels!) is somewhat depressing. Is our world sentenced to such a death?
We have been many times told about German and Nordic roots of Tolkien works. Yet Melkor name has a Sumerian resonance, and so has Tolkien pantheon with his many gods and goddesses inspired by various Mesopotamian mythologies. These lazy gods look like weird oriental deities, whom the prophets and our bible thought no good at all.
And the children of Israel did evil in the sight of the LORD, and served Baalim... And they forsook the LORD, and served Baal and Ashtaroth. (Judges, 2, 11)
So, was our good Christian forgetting his religion while writing his fantasy books? One may say that is just kid stuff...yeah! This was the case too for Mary Poppins, for Peter Pan, for the wizard of Oz, all devised by minds involved in the occult, in masonry or in theosophy! The Illuminati agenda matches perfectly, and so do the conspiracy theories, when it comes to children's literature or to children's movies!
As Melkor plays (wields, says Tolkien) with fire and cold, a little bit like Nazi scientist Horbiger, and dreams like Leonardo di Caprio that he is the king of the world, an horrible spider grows in the dark, but not in an hazardous place:
There, beneath the sheer walls of the mountains and the cold dark sea, the shadows were deepest and thickest in the world; and there in Avathar, secret and unknown, Ungoliant had made her abode.
Why the hell James Cameron chose that name, Avatar? Amazing pop culture!
But let's not change the matter and let's conclude, opening new gates: it is clear that a book like LOTR opens our minds and our eyes to another reality. I think that Tolkien was sometimes overwhelmed by his talent and imagination (sixty thousand pages of manuscript: where was he getting himself and us to?); but he challenged and analyzed - I shall get back to these points - the perils of modern world, "magic" (technology) and industrialization, IE the destruction of any wild or traditional landscape. He saw too, like Lovecraft, that we are surrounded by mysterious, forgotten and ubiquitous monsters. But who needed to awaken them, except video game industry?
I give the last word to the Illuminati Gandalf, reminding my readers that in Hebrew (as well as in Arabic) Anor means...the light.
"I am a servant of the Secret Fire, wielder of the flame of Anor. You cannot pass. The dark fire will not avail you, flame of Udûn. Go back to the Shadow! You cannot pass."
Proving that there is no limit to fundamentalist Christian extremism, the ultra-conservative Westboro Baptist church has launched a crusade against Rowan County Clerk Kim Davis despite all parties being against same-sex marriage.
While Davis is sitting in jail on contempt charges for refusing to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples, members of the extremist Westboro Baptist church in Topeka are threatening to go to Kentucky to protest against Davis for being an adulteress due to having been married four times and for causing “F*g marriage” because of her sinfulness.
Davis, who converted to Christianity four years ago maintains that she cannot issue licenses to gay couples on religious grounds, calling it a “Heaven or Hell decision.” Despite that, members of the Topeka church have launched a Twitter jihad on Davis saying she is a “phony divorced/remarried traitor to God,” and “#NotChristian.”
Addressing Davis, who has been married four times twice to the same man and reportedly had twins out of wedlock, Westboro tweeted: “Surely as a wife treacherously departeth from her husband, so have ye dealt treacherously with me.’ -The LORD”
A sampling of Westboro’s less than Christian charity towards Davis below.
Now that #KimDavis is in jail, time to criminalize homosexuality, adultery, fag marriage & fornication, and book 'em Danno! #FollowGodsLaw
What if a clerk denied #KimDavis a license for her 2nd/3rd/4th marriage because Christ calls it adultery?
#KimDavis & her "Christian" ilk have contributed as much to fag marriage as @HRC @TheAdvocateMag & other militants.
It's time to pack this sign and visit Kentucky -- land of the phony divorced/remarried traitors to God. #NotChristian
KY clerk Kim Davis would NOT feel at home at Westboro Baptist. She a fake (hence her 3 husbands!), @MattMurph24 >>
If Kim Davis has any real fear of God she'll resign and move out of the house from the man she lives w/ in adultery!
Kim can't keep living/sleeping with a man not her husband & say she's repented. Any more than "gay Christians" can. https://twitter.com/attitudemag/status/640149018186809344
Christ: “Whosoever putteth away his wife, and marrieth another, committeth adultery: ...
Luke 16:18 https://twitter.com/wbcsaysrepent/status/639617003221749760
While most married men view porn you may directly contribute to your husband viewing it more by neglecting your physical appearance. If you gain an excessive amount of weight or fail to properly groom yourself or wear nice clothes your husband may look more to porn than he normally would for the feminine beauty that he is naturally designed to crave.
Even if you take great care about your physical appearance if you are harsh, critical, disrespectful or less than fully receptive to your husband’s sexual advances he may view more porn than he would have otherwise. Most women fail to realize that men do not view porn only because of the bodies of these women or the sex acts themselves. Many men also view porn because of the enthusiasm these women show toward sexually pleasing the man they are with.
Even if you as a Christian wife take great care of your appearance and you willingly and enthusiastically have great sex with your husband he may still look at porn. I refer you back to hard truth number 2 about men and their sexuality men are designed by God with a capacity for polygyny. So this means even if your husband is thrilled with you in all these areas he will still be drawn to enjoy the view of a variety of women’s bodies.
Even if you deny most or all of the hard truths I have just stated the Bible nowhere gives you the right to deny you husband sex because is he doing something sinful. Remember that the same Bible which you believe says men viewing any kind of porn or thinking sexual thoughts of other women is wrong also says very clearly that a woman may not deny her husband sexually.
Even if you deny most or all of the hard truths I have just stated your husband is NOT accountable to you for his thought life or his actions. Even if you feel he is being disobedient to God in his porn use you are not his spiritual authority and you have no authority to confront him in this spiritual matter.
A few years ago the wife and I were planning a Christmas party and wanted two stereo's for music in the whole house. I didn't want to buy another so we decided to rent one. Called the store and set up delivery for 6:00 on a weeknight. Traffic stinks in the DC area so we were 10 min late. Buckwheat ( a 6.5' nigger) is waiting in the truck and had an attitude. I told him to chill out and headed for the house. He said he needs to see where we're putting the equipment, I tell him sure but I need to let my puppy out first. He stops in his tracks and axes " you gots a dog?" I told him "yea she's a pup".
Ok he's fine so I open the door and out of the dark blasts a 3 month old Doberman. She was jet black with her ears taped up with white tape and looking to play. Buckwheat screams O LAWDY JEBUS!! and turns to run. Well, he forgot about the waist high evergreen bush blocking his way to the truck. He slams head on into it and is now bent over assuming the classic prison position. Sasha sees this and thinks he wants to play so she's jumping up on his back giving him some love. Now he's screaming at the top of his lungs ( LAWDY!! GET IT OFF, GET IT OFF!!!). The more he screams the more she wants to play.
I think this is the funniest thing I've ever seen and start laughing my butt off. I finally drag her off of him and take her to the back yard. When I get back he's bent over trying to catch his breath and I'm still wiping tears from my eyes. He finally looks up and says " man when you gots a dobaman you don't tell people you gots a puppy you tell them you gots a dobaman!). I said sure, just go get the stereo. I ask him as he was leaving if anyone ever tried skipping out with the rental goods. He said " no, if they do the company sends him out to get it". Not that I would steal anything , but I told him " well you won't be coming back to my house caus l gots me a dobaman. Guess what. He didn't come back to get the stuff
Lady Checkmate's headline: "ELLE FASHION MAGAZINE PUBLISHES SHOCK VIDEO OF 8-YEAR OLD DRAG QUEEN NAMED LACTATIA"
The boy said he looks up to drag queens. "I love them because they do what they want to do and they're not afraid to do it," Nemis said. "My friends at school think Lactatia's very courageous. She's really good at dancing, they also think that she's really good at playing video games and stuff like that."
EDITOR’S NOTE: Did you really think the LGBTQ agenda was about “tolerance and equality” for gay people? Nope, the real target and aim of the LGBTQ movement has always been the children. Hitler was so successful not only be he persuaded the German people. Hitler succeeded because the Hitler Youth he started in the early 1920’s yielded the harvest of an entire generation he followed his teachings in the late 1930’s. You want real control? Control the children. Evil genius works like that.
“I’ve been wearing my sister’s tutu since I was like threes and fours, even like twos, and I’ve been dancing around in my little pink dresses and stuff, so yeah I think I’ve had Lactatia inside me since I was born, that’s why I love that song Born This Way,'” Nemis said in the video.
The boy took on the idea that children (at age 8!) should not even know what a “drag queen” is. “I know people would like go up to their parents and tell them that they want to be a drag queen, and then their parents would be like, You shouldn’t even know what that is.'”
The boy’s mother described the whole experience as “overwhelming you feel overwhelmed by pride that your child is expressing themselves, and showing the world, and it’s being so well received, and she’s pretty good at what she does.”
Yes, the mother referred to her son as “she.” This gender confusion ran through Nemis’s own view of himself. While he identified as a “diva” over and over again, he seemed unclear as to whether or not a man can be a “diva.”
Don't forget to RECOMMEND. Lets get the Truth out so that Light may shine bright in this dark place and Jesus Christ may be glorified.Even if the discussion is closed, please still RECOMMEND.
public backlash against the discovery that theropods were feathered isnt just anti science like lmao of course its misogynistic
birds are seen of as feminine and a metaphor for women. sparrow, songbird, dove, little bird, feathers go on womens clothes, eat like a bird, harpy/harping, etc.
reptiles are masculine because theyre “primitive” and violent, snakeskin boots, crocodile tooth hats, etc. an alligator purse is a gender subversive article of clothing for women, or at least one that suggests an unusual demand for power/notice.
dinosaurs are cool “monsters” with a hypermasculine culture around them (not in small part thanks to the hypermasculine paleontological and film industries) and to be confronted with the idea that they may have been more bird than reptile, or even a little visibly avian, is an affront the masculinity reptiles and large toothy carnivores are supposed to represent. people arent mad about raptors with feathers because theyll “look dumb.” they think the feathers will look dumb because they have a feminine connotation. theres a fear dinosaurs will be “corrupted” by traditionally girly shit. the public finds it insulting. the binary forces genders onto every symbol available and cant stand when the unnatural division is challenged by nature.
tl;dr if you think dinosaurs dont look cool with feathers it’s because you hate women
look at that nigger bitch, and to think she worked hard on making her hair look nice because she thinks that she can get some nigger to go out with her. how blind must yoube when you look in the mirror each morning and dont see that you weigh 700 pounds, fat people are lower then niggers, infact fat white people are lower then niggers, if you are fat and as fat as the bitch you need to get out of the house and running you lazy fuckers. goddamn i hate to see fat people who fix their hair up all nice like some man is looking for them, i hate it when fat people think that they just havent found the right man or woman yet and someday they will
Notes from an 'alternate universe': Aliens from Sirius and the US presidential election (the big picture)
A few days ago I posted the following on my thread (see below), as I thought it was important enough to share.
0 7 years ago, an entity from another world began to communicate through me by posting on this forum as user "Chaol"
0 I discovered this only a couple of years ago, after which time I began looking into all of the posts that I (as "Chaol") had made
0 After reading all of the posts and trying to understand the material I came up with a new kind of science, 'Quantum Metaphysics' that illustrates the information that Chaol explained through me
0 The science in the book is not a science at all, but a new way of thinking. I have asked several actual quantum theorists if they could disprove the theory, but the two that responded were unable to. (They are also unwilling to make public statements about it, so I consider this part mostly irrelevant.)
0 After thinking Chaol was a part of my subconscious, a few days ago I discovered that Chaol was actually a entity from another world
0 Chaol doesn't have a message for humanity, per se. She seems to only want me to spread the information in order to bridge my world and hers.
0 I have been spending time in Chaol's world (although Chaol calls it 'the dreamworld' it is also an actual physical place. Though Chaol travels using both body and mind.)
0 A few days ago I happened to ask her about the future and discovered a number of things. The following is one part of that that I think is rather important. (The information itself is necessarily distorted through my own lens of perspective, but I've been working to make it as 'accurate', or relative, as possible.)
none of the following is true...
A group of beings from the Sirius star system are planning to make themselves known to us in November in order to prevent the possibility of losing their ability to communicate with their home world. They have been physically here on Earth since 2011, and have been observing our world along with other nearby worlds for a very, very long time. For reasons that will concern us far more than would concern them, the future of humanity is at stake.
Our history with these beings goes back to the dawn of humanity, when they found ways to inter-breed with certain types of animals native to Earth. (I'm not too familiar with Zecharia Sitchin or Erich von Daniken's work but perhaps some clues could be found in that direction.)
This group (whose name I did not find out) have come to prevent us from using advanced nuclear weapons. But it is not because they 'care' about humanity or our civilization, per se. We are left to our own devices, but not when those devices disrupt other worlds it seems. A nuclear war on Earth using our latest nuclear weapon technology would pollute the solar system with a tremendous amount of geomagnetically induced current, which interfers with the electromagnetic fields they use to communicate with their world from their nearby base.
Chaol is not aligned with this group but does have some knowledge of their whereabouts and what they are up to, and has shown me some of this because I thought to ask what the future is like.
The US government (along with others) have known of their presence since 2011 and has contingency plans with other major governments in case of an "alien invasion". From what I can see there isn't the sligtest possibility of an alien invasion (as there would be no need) but the Sirius beings know that war and defense is our natural response. General Douglas MacArthur - in a 1955 speech - said that the next (world) war will be interplanetary. It is no coincidence that Donald Trump continues to bring his name up. I think there are a number of others in the US and around the world who are aware of the Sirius presence and believe it to be an immediate threat to their own well-being.
The US government has been preparing for inter-planetary war since before Roswell. (Indeed, the craft at Roswell was their own. Their 'clever' cover story got out of hand.) But again, there is no possibility of war with these beings. Our technologies are exceedingly primitive in comparison and Earth has nothing of any value to them. That doesn't stop certain powerful interests that use proxies in government, media, and every corner of society from thinking otherwise. The names that you read about and think are pulling the strings ("the powers that be") are themselves proxies of people whose names you've never heard of. They believe that -- long ago -- the beings from Sirius gave control of Earth to them, the 'chosen ones' (which they didn't).
(By the way.. the "reptilian" conspiracy is not too far off from reality. There are no human-looking reptile beings from other worlds but there are people that use their primitive, reptilian brain (the oldest part of the human brain, that we have the Sirians to thank for). This part of the brain very easily connects with the more emotion-based right hemisphere. I believe that people that see some humans as reptiles are subconsciously picking up on the other person's heightened use of their primitive brain.)
The Sirians do plan, however, to render not only our nuclear weaponry inert but also our massive particle colliders (CERN, LHC, etc) one of which is a secret attempt to build a portal to Sirius. Further, their plan is to completely disable the mechanisms that those devices rely on -- which means the tremendous logistics and resources that are used to support them -- in order to prevent us from developing the same types of devices in future. THIS is the part that affects us most.
So what now?
The pace of things has increased as governments around the world have stepped up their plans (and made new ones) in response to the 2011 Sirius arrival. I don't know what will happen next, but I do know that the Sirius group wants to shift the nuclear drums of war towards cooperation to defend against an extra-terrestrial threat that doesn't exist.
Scenario 1 seems to be a "Cold War" type scenario with two groups of countries developing nuclear weapons to use against each other. Although it seems highly unlikely that any would seriously consider deploying such weapons, the very existence of such weapons is a threat to the Sirius group.
Scenario 2 (desired by the Sirius group) is where they make themselves known, peacefully. Regardless of their benevolence, this would set off a cooperation between governments to shift resources to developing different kinds of weapons that will not interfere with their communications. People would generally see their presence as peaceful and interesting whereas -- behind closed doors -- governments would be frantically developing defensive measures.
They are planning to reveal themselves in the middle of November or December at the latest. There are some other events playing out on the world stage that dictates the need for their timeline, as we might see soon enough.
I just noticed something. Anyone else seeing what im seeing in this logo? Is that what I think it is?
THE ALL SEEING EYE OF DIANA LUCIFERA
When you give a name to something, it often sums up your desires and aspirations; the name is that of a statement, which often says something about you. In the world of advertising, the merchandising of a product is based around the a name of a brand; this can lead to copyright wars, when a well known brand name of a company is copied by a copycat, which seeks to ride its back.
As you can determine going by one’s own name, to that of naming a child, a name is very important; you may have even given a pet name to an inanimate object, such as your car; wherefore It is rather curious that the holier than thou Vatican astronomers who are enthroned atop of Mt Graham in Arizona would associate themselves with a telescope named the: Lucifer Binocular Telescope (LBT).
But then the patriarchal name of the fallen angel Lucifer, that many equate with their phallic Devil to otherwise call Satan had originally been derived from the name of the ancient Roman Goddess, Diana-Lucifera who had nothing to do with evil. Diana Lucifera is depicted wielding a torch, looking somewhat like the statue of Liberty. Her torch refers to an inner fire, you can equate with the bio-photon light emanating from your mitochondrial DNA, which illuminates your dreams, and in turn illuminating your perception of reality.
The mitochondrial DNA is passed down from the mother to her children; hence, the source of the inner light was intuitively sensed by many ancient cultures as being female; whereby, the Hindu’s saw the creative source of your experiential reality as being a Goddess to name as Maya; the ancient Roman’s named Diana Lucifera.
The prior name of Columbus for the telescope sums up the discovery of another world and its denizens. However, a Native American will point out that it is the other way around concerning the Ga’an.
Who knows, you may be unknowingly living upon a reservation of a prison planet as fallen angels, since the number 666 is the atomic number of carbon. We are all carbon based life-forms; whereby, if you sincerely believe 666 represents evil, you are then saying all life is evil.
Should you allow for your imagination to let rip, to enter into the arena of science fiction, you could see the Ga’an as being an inorganic intelligence, who are silicon based, you could otherwise construe as being a machine intelligence, like drones. You could then see your reality as being akin to a computer simulation as depicted in the Matrix films.
This isn’t too far fetched as it seems since your perceptions of reality are often subiminally molded by symbolic stimuli all around you, which can be easily manipulated; such as by using a name, like Lucifer, to then subversively conjure up associative correspondences within your indoctrinated subconscious; wherefore, you then find yourself surrounded by invisible prison bars of a symbolic Matrix.
child pornography and thought crime
Today, I was playing Fable, and during the load times, I would turn my Vcr off to see whats on TV. What was on under it was Oprah, now the load time is long and I like listening to people who want attention by talking about how they cheated on their husband for 27 years on public television. But, what the issue was, was child pornography. Eventually, they came to the point where an 18 year old had been convicted of possession of it. Now, their initial reaction was, "Oh mah Jesus what a screwed up child!".
To me, they thought it just to persecute the man for thought crime. The man was not a sexual offender, only in possession of child pornography. This means they were persecuting him on the grounds of thought crime. Personally, what are the benefits of child porn being illegal? Raping children should be illegal, not the pornography. Either way, they were persecuting him for thought crime.
On the flip side, does someone who watches child pornography have a higher likelihood to become a sexual offender? Should said person be made aware of on a list of potential sex offenders? Is it better to be safe that sorry at the expense of a mans reputation?
As for thought crime, I believe no thought is a crime. Period. But then again, what if you think about killing the president? Or express it over the phone?Would they persecute you to be safe? Would it be right? Just like would it be right to persecute someone for downloading child porn?
What do you all think? About child porn in particular and about thought crime.
Possessing CP is not a thought crime because he is supporting the makers of CP, who are harming children.
Fictional child pornography however harms nobody and possession of that is morally OK, even if it's disgusting. But real CP is a definite crime
Yes, it is a thought crime, because to justify persecution on such grounds, the only logical thing one could do is claim that looking at child porn makes you more apt to rape children, which has been shown as ridiculous. Otherwise, how does the possession of it in anyway support the maker? (Unless you are buying it.) And how in any way have you committed any type of crime besides thought?
Where did the 2 Obongo children come from?
While looking at the photo of the nigger Obongo "family" it becomes very apparent that neither of the 2 youngboons are genetic descendants of either barry or moochy. Children always look like at least one of their parents or grandparents. People are very good at identifying facial features and once you know somebody is a family member you can "just tell" by looking.
This is easily explainable as:
A: Barry is a down-low queer
B: Moochy is physically a man and cannot give birth.
So where did they come from?
Now, Obongo's mother is said to be Ann Dunham. This I believe, as the shape of the face and eyes looks like Barry.
Obongo's father is said to be this nigger, which I do not believe at all:
It is much more likely that Obongo's father is communist nigger Frank Davis:
I don't think either of the 2 youngboons look like any of these niggers, so where did they come from? In fact I believe the 2 came from entirely different families, they don't even look like each other.
President Barack Obama looks amazingly like Akhenaten the father of monotheism. Michelle Obama looks amazingly like Akhenaten's mother, Queen Tiye. Akhenaten had two daughters by Nefertiti They look amazingly like Malia and Sasha. The code names of Renegade, Renaissance, Radiance and Rosebud correlate well with the ancient depiction of the Royal Family.
Are the First Family clones?
I have been showing off my art work of Barack Obama as Akhenaten to see what people think. Admittedly, most of my friends already see the world differently than your average citizen. Let's just say they already come with a conspiracy bent. My hope is to instill wonder in our world and to say that things just might be a little stranger than you thought.
I would show my friends this picture and say, "What do you think?" Without any other comment.
They would say, "Well, he does look a lot like Akhenaten."
My jaw would dangle just a bit.
"OK, I understand that you do not know that this woman next to Barackhenaten is Akhenaten's mother, Queen Tiye."
"That's really her face?"
"I have done nothing to alter their faces. I simply found a photo that was facing the right direction and their mouth was closed. I cut the face in half and super-imposed it on the ancient busts."
"That is amazing!"
"It gets even stranger. I found that two of the six daughters of Akhenaten and Queen Nefertiti became Queens themselves...
I wait for it.
"They do look like Akhenaten's children!"
"Notice in this ancient frieze of Akhenaten and Nefertiti with their two girls, what is the other most prominent features of this picture?"
"Didn't Akhenaten worship the sun god Aten?"
"Oh, and the flowers."
"Exactly. Do you know the code names the secret service gave the first family?"
"Isn't that a secret?"
"I guess it should be but, no, it was in the news. Their names are Renegade, Renaissance, Radiance, and Rosebud."
"Radiance and Rosebud?"
"Absolutely. Here look for yourself."
"Well, what do you think now?"
"Are there family connections?"
Come on, what are the odds that a woman that looks exactly like the mother of Akhenaten would marry a man who looks exactly like Akhenaten and have two children that look exactly like the offspring of Akhenaten and Nefertiti?
As a child, my mind was open to wondrous possibilities. As I studied the pyramids and ancient astronauts, I learned that mummification had a mysterious property that we in the, then, 20th century could not reproduce. Our new mummies decompose. The ancient Egyptian mummies did not. I knew this allowed for the retrieval of a viable cell for cloning and I pondered if there would be some day when "they" would bring back the Pharaohs. I was thinking of some Armageddon script when the dead would walk the Earth. What I never thought of, was the clones coming out as the first family of America!
Today is a great day to live.
There are definitely questions of Barack's origins.
"Mr. Obama is not a natural born citizen." What kind of riots or Constitutional erosion would occur if this is true? The revolution is manufactured.
Were there other clones like Barack?
I think, on average, we are more good looking than IT cucks.
When i think about us, incels, i picture something like this:
Skinny white guys with ugly faces. That's how i picture us.
So.. i guess we are ugly, but let's compare the picture above with the average cuck:
I mean, i wouldn't think about it twice: being a cuck is... miserable.
I also think that this is the reason we, despite being ugly, do not compromise to being cucked. Cuck is so inferior that he is FORCED to become bluepilled and drink Chad's cum. We have a shread of dignity because, despite being ugly, we do not look ridiculous.
People who like child porn don't need 'therapy'. It's perfectly fine to like child porn, even real child porn. It's only not okay to produce it (because it's rape) and it's not okay to support the child porn industry (by buying the product). In this case, we are dealing with animated porn in which children MAY be involved (I still have not seen any actual titles named so even this is unproven). There is nothing illegal about producing animated porn or animated child porn, and there SHOULD be nothing illegal about watching animated child porn either. In most countries it is certainly legal. In Australia, it MAY be illegal but even that is not proven as the articles that reported this incident have not given us enough information to prove that it was not just a case where the Australian justice system made a mistake.
If you think people who like child porn need 'therapy', then gays need 'therapy' too. Maybe people who think the Earth is round need 'therapy'. So let's throw them in the corner and kill them by throwing stones at them, or tie them up and burn them up at the stake as heretics, like in the olden days.
Some Hawaiians think that super fat women are beautiful. That's nasty. They are heretics I say. We should throw all the Hawaiians into a corner and stone them to death.
Maybe people who DON'T like child porn need 'therapy'. The people who do like child porn should throw all the stupid normal people into the corner and stone them to death. The only reason this wouldn't work though is that more people don't like child porn than those who do, so if there is a stone-throwing war then the child porn people lose.
There's no right or wrong. It's simply groups of people with different attributes. Some people think the world is flat and some people think the world is round. What happens when people have disagreements? I dunno, I guess that's what the government is for, but governments don't always do a perfect job either (think Saddam Hussein or Hitler).
I think it'd be interesting if a small country openly declared pedophilia, and even real-life child porn and child sex, completely legal in that country. I don't see this as an impossibility at all (considering things that countries have done in the past). I bet if such a country were to exist, people would find that there are more pedophiles in the world than gays.
Real Life Fallen Angel Has Fallen From The Sky In London.
This happened today in the morning - God exists. imageimageimageimage
You will receive Blessing in the next 1 hour if you SHARE and Type "AMEN" in Jesus' name image
Tomas Alvin’s YNK imperial space fleet cargo spaceship’s commander was an MILAB alien abducted Illuminati sub-group Atlantis Nephilim “old religion” New Age esoteric occult Japanese cult group witch “alien contactee” necromancer spirit guide channeler named Commander Morioka. They use small lizard chimera aliens that look like raptor dinosaurs on the spaceships to maintenance repair small spaces. Aside from the Nazi SS 4th Reich Empire’s star destroyer imperial space fleet called the “Nacht Waffen” (Night Army) and the international space fleets, there is also a Japanese Empire’s star destroyer imperial space fleet called the YNK or “Yozora No Kyushu” (Wards of the Night Sky). These breakaway civilizations were not around on earth when the cultural changes took place, so they still retain the old culture. Tomas Alvin was transferred into the Japanese imperial space fleet the YNK. Tomas says that the United Nations runs most of the secret space fleets out in space. The Nazis build their star destroyer spaceships on the dark side of the moon and on other planets. Tomas says that you often see YouTube videos that say that a giant UFO was seen near Saturn, but when you look at them carefully, they are one of ours and not alien spacecraft. The later version of the TR3B which is the TR3K is used in the outer galactic rim. Even the small secret space fleet’s spaceships like the “Horizon” are 20 miles long and 4 miles wide and half a mile high. A lot of the Illuminati spaceship manufacturing company industries are located between the galactic rim and the inner ring. They were able to build such a huge space fleet of thousands of giant spaceships in such a short time, because they time travel into the future to pick up their orders for the spaceships
I am sure that all of the pro homo pro aborts libs and Hillary Clinton fans think that my trumpet playing is poor, those people who do not think that I can play a trumpet well are the ones who are the complete joke. I am not the Christian trumpet player who played the trumpet for the pro aborts. I play the Trumpet for the Lord, not for the baby killers and for queer ministers and their pro homo pro abort "churches".
Those who do not repent and give up their homosexual lifestyle will spend all eternity in Hell, (unrepentant) practicing homosexuals will not inherit the Kingdom of God, see 1 Corinthians 6:9-10.
When I shared the prophetic word below with my intercessors, it troubled them. I understand why. It troubled me also. I decided to hold it back and pray it through but the Holy Spirit recently reminded me of these words again. These words should not breed fear but should open our eyes to what's coming, and what, in fact, is already beginning to manifest right before our eyes. Here is the word:
Calling Evil Good and Good Evil
"A tsunami of perversion and all manner of wicked sin is headed toward this nation. You've only yet seen the rumblings of what the enemy has planned. For many in your nation have called good evil and called evil good. Many in this nation have not believed you will reap what you sow.
"You have sown iniquityfor decadesand you have taken the hand of perversion. You have walked in step with abominations rather than resisting the temptations to deny my Word and my Son. The perversion in this land will increase and increase and increase.
"There will come a day when morality is no longer merely relative but is persecuted. There will come a day when evil is considered good and good is considered evil. When that day comes, those who are hidden in the shadow of My wings will be insulated from the abominations around them.
"I will raise up the likes of Abraham and Moses to deliver the righteous out of the hand of the wicked in that day. I will shield those who run into my Name. But no longer look and no longer think that you will turn the tide by your prayers alone. These things must be so. I warn you now to fear not, but to ready your hearts. Buy your oil. Be ready for My coming."
It's Not Just Sexual Perversion
Yes, we've seen the rumblings of this rising perversion but I believe it's going to grow darker still. When you think of perversion you probably immediately think of sexual perversionand I believe that's part of it. The Bible has plenty to say about sexual perversion in Romans 1:21-28 alone and we're seeing that passage playing out right now.
But sexual immoralitypolygamy, homosexuality, adultery, fornication and legal bestiality that I've so often addressedis not the only kind of perversion. There's perversion of laws, perversion of justice, perversion of speech, perversion of freedomand most importantly, perversion of God's Word. Apostasy is rising. The Great Falling Away is underway.
After praying over this and letting it sit for some months, it became clear to me that the root of this tsunami of perversion is actually the perversion of God's Word itself. You've seen a trickle of this, but it's about to break out like a flood. Again, we're seeing prominent pastors and entire denominations perverting God's Word, twisting it to defend and justify perversion itself and suggesting the rest of us are legalistic or unenlightened about the truth. It may have started with the gay marriage doctrine but it won't end there.
Your story is there waiting for you, it has been waiting for you there a hundred years,
long before you were born and you cannot change a comma of it. Everything you do
you have to do. You are the twig, and the water you float on swept you here. You are
the leaf, and the breeze you were borne on blew you here. This is your story and you
cannot escape it
-Cornell woolrich, I Married a Dead Man
The Blackpill is an idea, centered in evolutionary psychology, which attempts to explain romantic partnership as stemming from 3 interrelated factors
1. Physical attractiveness
3. Social Status
Five central themes emerge from this thesis.
1. Looks are necessary to the formation of physical or romantic desire
2. Looks are not distributed evenly among men
3. Looks are not subjective.
4. The Dualistic Mating Strategy
Each one of the five central themes plays a part in deriving Incel Vocabulary. Looks being necessary,unevenly distributed, and objective provides two familiar categories, the Incel and Chad
And even if you were to consider lolicons pedos, if a pedo came out to anyone, they'd get the police called on them. Therapists are required to aren't they? Even if said pedo isn't hurting anyone and has no intention to. Which I think is pretty harsh imo. Furthermore, taking away pedo's outlets is dangerous, because if anything they is going to be illegal, what is stopping them from doing actual harm, other than them wanting to protect children. It might not be a perfect defense against child abuse, and those who rape kids are going to anyway, but at least it gives the ones who do not want to harm kids something safe to rub their rod.
But I really don't think it's fair to everyone who enjoys lolicon a pedo, just as it's not fair to call someone into bdsm or rape porn a rapist, nor do they really wish to be raped. And rape porn is a popular genre. It's a fantasy, an escape. And I think escapism is fine just so long as you don't take the fantasy into real life. The loli porn is not the problem, it's the people who can't tell the difference between reality and fiction.
Either way, I don't think people should care what I wank to if it harms nobody. Also sorry if I seem like a cunt at any point, I am not trying to. I've noticed that I am probably being too bitter in the past comments. Just very passionate about the topic I guess.
Alright bro. I'm going to level here. If anyone is trying really hard here to keep porn where children lookalikes are in, then I think that person is a massive pedo. Murdering another human being is completely different to allowing lolis in porn. And don't get on a high horse about defending fiction and how it shouldn't be messed with. You look like a pedo, defending this. Take a step back, and just reevaluate yourself.
Yea this is an edit just went through your profile a little. I understand why you are defending this so hard. Cause you are a pedo.
Double edit: "17 is more than old enough tho" yea your a pedo
So it's okay to murder another human being but not okay to allow lolis in porn? Do people look gay for defending gays? Do people look like murderers for defending murder in games?
I really don't see how violent video games and lolis are so different that they cannot be compared. Both are fiction and both depict something illegal and wrong, I think that's fair ground for comparison.
The only reason I look like a pedo to you is because you're not willing to accept that fiction isn't reality and enjoying something in fiction doesn't mean you enjoy in real life.
ok whats really funny about this part of the subject is this.no matter what you do you can't get away from what God intended.it doesn't matter if it's 2 women or 2 men there is always one who plays the part of the women and one who plays the part of the man.I work at a subway and 2 women lovers came in and it was really weird cause the one who was playing the girl was really ugly and very manly looking but the one playing the man looked like she could be really hot if she would let her hair grow out and act like a girl.I mean if the gender roles are going to be there why not just go with the real thing?
Here at TomatoBubble.com, your favorite investigative reporter and his ferocious feline sidekick scour the Internet to bring you news and views that "they" don't want you to know about. Often times, we end up dismissing some of our most outrageous findings simply because, upon closer inspection, the claim cannot be substantiated to our satisfaction. We simply refuse to play the "anonymous sources" game.
We recently stumbled across an item which we found so profiundly disturbing that we initially suspected it to be a hoax for the simple reason that it was just a bit too "in your face" to be true. But alas, because the hour of "their" final triumph approaches so rapidly and so unimpeded, "they" evidently believe that there is no longer anything to fear about such blatant in-your-faceness as what we are about to present. We are sorry to have to say that the following story of the Paris White Genocide mural, and its craetor's background and connections, is indeed accurate.
SOME OF THE IMAGERY BELOW, THOUGH CARTOONISH IN NATURE, IS OBSCENE AND VIOLENT
A giant mural painting on the floor below Paris' iconic Eiffel Tower was completed in September of 2016 by a Los Angeles-based artist named Cleon Peterson. The bizarre "work of art" is titled, "Endless Sleep" -- an obvious reference to the coming "endless sleep" of the White Race. There is really no need for us to interpret the meaning of Peterson's obscenity. To all but the most brain-dead libtard, the massive 500 square-meter image, best viewed from the top of the Eiffel Tower while looking straight down, speaks for itself.
Have a look:
The Star of David at the center is an obvious tribute to the terrible Tribe that is behind White Genocide and to the House of Rothschild in particular. But don't take our word for it. Here it is, from a tweet, from Peterson himself:
Peterson, an "ex" heroine addict, tweeted out his gratitude to French banking couple Benjamin and Ariane de Rothschild. We suspect (though we have no solid evidence to present) that the "gratitude" is related to Peterson (with 10 helpers) having been commissioned to paint the disgusting White Genocide mural.
Should there be any remaining doubt as to what the Eiffel Tower floor mural truly symbolizes, a review of the self-loathing artist's earlier works -- depicting what he refers to as "the hedonistic triumphs of those who recognize themselves as victorious in the unfolding mirror of history" -- clearly confirms what Peterson and the Rothschilds are dreaming about. Be forewarned, these images are obscene and unsettling.
DON'T SAY WE DIDN'T WARN YOU!
-- and don't send us nasty E-mails for publishing them.
Before hooking up with the Rothschilds and painting Paris, Peterson was known for churning out scenes of torture, rape and mass murder of White people at the hands of Blacks --- a perfect hireling for the Rothschilds!
In his 1925 book 'Praktischer Idealismus', the half-Austrian / half-Japanese Globalist Count Richard Coundehove Kalergi boldly declared that the citizens of the future "United States of Europe" will not be White people anymore. In his own words, the man who is today regarded as one of the founders of "modern Europe" revealed the game:
"The man of the future will be of mixed race. The races and classes of today will gradually disappear due to the elimination of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-negroid race of the future, similar in appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with the diversity of individuals.
Of course, Kalergi's chosenite paymasters will not be replaced or blended out by this "Eurasian-negroid race of the future". Wrote the hired hack of his beloved Rothschild bosses:
"Instead of destroying European Judaism, Europe, against her will, refined and educated this people, driving them to their future status as a leading nation through this artificial evolutionary process. It's not surprising that the people that escaped from the Ghetto-Prison, became the spiritual nobility of Europe. Thus, the compassionate care given by Europe created a new breed of aristocrats. This happened when the European feudal aristocracy crashed because of the emancipation of the Jews."
The artistic abomination at the Eiffel Tower is "The Kalergi Plan" --- in paint. The end game is upon us, and for those who think that the final stages of genocide will be manifested by a peaceful and gradual blending-out of the last remaining non-elite White Europeans, Peterson's previous paintings, and Rothschild's evident affinity for them, ought to dispel that delusion once and for all.
Kalergi, writing on behalf of Rothschild & Friends, foresaw the current Turd World invasion of Europe. The end to an aging and morally decadent White Europe will come violently for many.
I just stumbled on a YouTube video of a girl talking about she had 20+ jobs and she wasn't able to fit in because she's pretty and has to deal with catty women. I'm just going to be a bit blunt and correct me if I'm wrong but, I'd take the pretty girl "curse" any day than the torment I go through for being ugly. I understand everything has its advantages and disadvantages but the advantages of being pretty beats the disadvantages. I can't even get a temporary job yet there is someone who can hop scotch from job to job even being a brand embassador? Talk about life on easy mode for these women.
I've gotten more attractive in the last 7 years but before that I was picked on constantly and treated like crap by my peers, particularly men.
My biggest problem now as an "attractive woman" is how annoying it is when guys persistently hit on me. Its not comparable to how shitty it feels the other way around. These people couldn't even begin to imagine how awful it is to be an outcast all because you're not pretty enough. Talk about soul crushing.
I agree with you sis. Also congratulations on maxxing
I hate it when they play the victim. Girl, your entire worth is your looks and yet you somehow think they are a curse??? Lmao, try living a week without them and then tell me how it went.
They know it but will play I don't know what wha wha card
Yeah I may come across as harsh but I really don't give a shit about their apparent #prettygirlproblems. Like I feel a lot of the issues they complain about are exaggerated or rooted more in their individual personalities as oppose to them actually being pretty. From what I've seen women tend to flock to attractive women and want to befriend them, they also automatically find them more trustworthy and give ugly women all the negative connotations of 'jealous, bitter' etc. They also have had so many people treat them with so much kindness that when they encounter somebody who treats them like the average joe, and assume (if it's a woman) that she must be jealous. If it irks them so much when women are catty towards them then they can come together with us and deconstruct lookism to the best of our ability, thus in turn removing capitilism, patriachy and so on. But they won't because they know the pros outway the cons for them.
Tbh most people who I've encountered who have catty, condescending and rude have been pretty women. I think just a quick look online can show numerous pretty women with horrible personalities. They know they have a privilege and I wish we could take that away for a day, and let them see how geniunely awful it is to be an ugly woman.
Sadly when you begin to talk about how badly ugly women are treated they shut their ears wiggle their heads saying nope, it's your problem you have no confidence. I knew this Naomi (light skin) who claimed to be a humanitarian and caring about mental health and individual struggles to be extra likable and I tried to talk about the struggles I face, and she had the "amused" facial expression and told me that all women get the same treatment and ugly girls or their problems are non existent. Mind you while I was telling her about problems that I as an ugly girl go through and others, she had the most unamused facial expression only to act shock in the end. These women know the pros of being attractive outweigh the cons yet they'll play "muh don't know what you are talking about" card. They know it and I respect someone like Cynde Black who acknowledged the fact.
PS: This Naomi lives off a betabuxx as well.. No shit freaking Sherlock.
Give me pretty problems any day
The pussy economy
How Beckys and Stacies with low standards are our actual worse enemy. I truly couldn't care less about how many guys a woman has slept with. My initial reaction would be to be happy for her and that she's living her best life. I do not think of them as a nasty person or lesser than for it. I do think they are kind of playing themselves though by letting men (especially men not within their looks match!!!)use them as a masturbation toy without anything in return. Dick is an abundance, pussy is valuable. They are decreasing the value of pussy. I think about how her actions affect what men think is attainable and how that affects ME. It's the most conflicting feeling. It is selfish I know but it fucks over all of us femcels in the end. Yeah, this is a bit like hypergamy in a way but the thing is... it's not about men dating up like women it's them being able to give nothing in return for sex. Which is all they care about and want until they are 35, old and ugly and finally want to settle down. This is why they are the way they are so freely (TRASH). Women with an actual say (desirable normies) allow this shit. They have the chance to set the rules and they fucking DON'T. Pick me bitches are the BANE OF MY FUCKING EXISTENCE AND ALL SHOULD BE EXECUTED ON SIGHT. Imagine if women all around the world set a standard for men. If men wanted pussy then they have to meet these standards to get it. It would filter out all shitty entitled below average men in like 10 years tops. We already have this with men who are undesirable and insufferable with NO redeeming quality. Natural selection automatically filters them out of the gene pool.
If Becky's bar wasn't so low, life for us femcels would not be as bad. The below average man would actually have to date within their looks match. We will never have this way of life but it's nice to think of it. This is why I make sure all my attractive friends know they can do better than whatever average loser they are dating (I usually go for their looks and stature). This is how we keep balance. If you have attractive family members and friends the best you can do for your self is to make sure they date up as high as they can. Don't encourage them to settle for average moids. The average moid now thinks they are better than what they actually are and it fucks up our choices as femcels even more. Theres a few different points of this thread, it's more about how much I hate pick me bitches and girls that have no idea how much better they can do. I hate seeing ugly men with attractive nice women. The only way this would be acceptable is if the man has money, I have a lot of respect for gold diggers bc they know their worth. The modern male, for the most part, is only good for money. They should work 23 hours a day with 30 minutes for sleep and 30 mins to eat. I truly believe the media selling very average looking men as desirable to the masses of women is a total con job by higher-ups to ensure the average moid gets to reproduce. So many of the men that get that silly magazine title of "sexiest man in the world" are average as fuck and nothing more.
Here's the kicker: women in general don't think they are good looking enough (even if they're attractive) for good looking men. There is this huge myth that good looking men are inherently more shitty than your average man, but in reality they have the exact same personality. Men are told to date up, women are told to date who they think they deserve.
So attractive women date guys that they settle for, and end up realizing that not only are they settling for looks, but that their boyfriends personality is shit. Those attractive girls don't leave their mediocre partners because of a myriad of reasons ultimately caused by internalized misogyny which makes them feel like they need to take care of their inadequate boyfriend, slut shames them, tells them they're not good enough, and that they're worthless if they're alone.
This cycle will continue until women realize that being alone and having standards is better than accommodating a man that only brings them stress and heartache.
This is exactly what I thought, you worded this so well! Average men are really scamming them. These blue pilled Beckys need to get pink pilled. Attractive women, most of the time are already pink pilled bc of dealing with stupid horny men since they hit puberty. It's the Beckys that need it the most. Some of them are already pink pilled but still succumb to men afterwards bc they are weak and want to live that nuclear family life. On the positive side, I see that "men are trash" has become a universally agreed-upon truth by women that are more socially aware and non traditional ways of living are becoming more popular.
you CANNOT escape your genetic DESTINY
I firmly believe that your life with women is determined from the moment you'r conceived. I mean there are guys who do NO gym, who are misogynists, job less, smoke weed and they pull hot girls, regularly.. why? genetics. Genetic destiny. It is all taken care of by nature. Only 10% or even less of the men are meant for breeding, the rest are for structural support, that is natures intention. The things is, this was always the case, but no one ever knew it so CLEARLY like we do today, thanks to science, media, and general awakening of the masses.
Because even though the betas are not meant to breed, we still have the same inbuilt fundamental desire to procreate... So life becomes a hell. Its like being a fish that's allergic to water. You have to constantly watch attractive woman, and even women BELOW your league, ALL walking by ignoring you in favour of the Alpha, while you rip your hair out over it. You hit the GYM HARD, while Alpha eats pizza. Girls look at your gymcel body and think "ewww what a try hard" while they look at the chad and think "i love him, he just does what he wants, not even concerned about the whole bodybuilding thing". But in reality it is all in the face, in the pheromones, in the frame, in the depth of the voice, in the facial stubble.
That's what girls are SOLD on. When the imagine romantic partners, THAT is what they imagine being ravished by. You can even be an AVERAGE guy, 6 even a 7 out of ten and STILL be completely over looked. In this day and age, there is no such thing as good enough for women. Women are getting more and more choice and validation and its either CHAD or NOTHING. It is FUTILE to looks max, if you are not ATLEAST a 7 out of 10. futile.
Not only that but when you finally get a strong physique like me, and you realize girls STILL dont like you while they will fuck the high T, skinny weed smoker. That's when you start to resent all your own hardwork. Its like dammmm man, DAYUM, I did 3 years of gym, got fucking abs, just to for this? hahaha. Im hysterical... This is genetic destiny buddy boys.
By the way, MONEY and STATUS are MINIMAL in their affect, romance is ALL about looks, always. And in particular the FACE is what matters. I'm 23 now, i've approached over 9000 women in all sorts of ways in the last 3 years. Justin Wayne bootcamp, Zan perrion coaching, Arash Dibazar, I heard them ALL. I know the dynamics of game in and out. I've had sex with atleast 2 7+ white hot girls and like 2 more 6/10 white girls. But man the amount of effort I put in is out of this world. I applaud myself for the solid effort. But to me this journey is not worth it. And guess what? I started out as a 6 and it was this hard for me to get some. I can't imagine life for a sub 6, you guys are royally FUCKED, it is literally IMPOSSIBLE. Go to thailand, become escortcel, amass wealth, or do something productive like helping children in Africa. Hey man atleast they will LOVE you for helping them, atleast they will appreciate. Do not waste time entertaining the idea that you can somehow make it.
Elliot Rodger was deluded, he didn't even TRY to make it work. But in the end I have to agree with him, it is indeed utterly hopeless and utterly unfair to beta males. Nature is a bitch.
Definitions of the Races
Jews Jews are basically living “Satan’s” living here on earth. They are the most vile and evil race on earth. Wherever Jews go, they are hated, and hated for good reason. They are human parasites that leech off of their host nations. Jews believe they are God’s chosen race and above all gentiles (non-Jews).
What Jews are good at Banking, stealing, corruption, murder of gentiles, destruction of nations/governments, porn, having giant noses, slander, lying and communism.
Greatest Achievements Child molestation, gay rights, communism, being kicked out of every European Nation at least once and killing Jesus Christ.
Blacks Blacks are the dumbest and most primitive people on earth. They are known by their laziness, stupidity and love of fried chicken. Wherever black people are, you find poverty, high crime rates and disease.
What blacks are good at Basketball, rape, interracial crime, eating watermelon, not working, stealing cars, robbing liquor stores, drinking malt liquor and collecting welfare.
Greatest Achievements Spreading Aids, cannibalism, Jessie Owens winning a race, poverty and the lowest IQ among all races.
Asians Asians are best known for all looking alike and having the smallest penises on earth. When not eating dogs and cats, they find time to watch porn anime and ways to look white. When not playing online video games, they are known to take 500 pictures a day.
What Asians are good at Over populations, mass murder of each other, bombing subways, controlling the dog and cat population by eating them and copying everything the white race does. They also own massage parlors that give happy endings.
Greatest Achievements Surviving two atomic bomb blasts, mass suicides during World War II, bad karaoke and making 1,235 food dishes with rice.
Muslims Muslims are the terroristic Semitic-cousins of Jews. The only difference is the fact Muslims will actually hold jobs which require more than corruption. Muslims are best known by their horrible sounding language, ugly women and hatred of Jews.
What Muslims are good at Blowing shit up, hijacking planes, forming terrorist cells, killing women and children, hating white culture but using our ideas and giving us the fake religion of Islam.
Greatest Achievements 9/11, selling cheap knock off cell phone accessories at flea markets, using Western Technology while complaining about Western Culture and killing Jews.
American Indians American Indians are a savage mongrel race. Like blacks, they constantly complain about the past and how the white man owes them. American Indians can be found drunk at any given casino. When not rain-dancing, they are drunk.
What American Indians are good at Chain smoking, being drunk, owning casinos, rain-dancing, living in the past, blaming others for their primitive ways and using their heritage to gain free government assistance.
Greatest Achievements Losing to the white man, popcorn, suing professional sports teams with Indian mascots and testing out smallpox blankets.
Mexicans Mexicans are a mongrel race best known for the destroying the beauty of the European Language known as Spanish. They are a fat race with hairy women. They stink and only real trade is picking fruit or drug trafficking.
What Mexicans are good at Illegally crossing borders, underground tunnels, roofing, women having facial hair, having babies, making tacos and wearing hot pants.
Greatest Achievements Destroying the Spanish Language, Pedro from Napoleon Dynamite, Dora the Explorer, being shot by border patrol and prison gangs.
Thought I'd add my 2 cents here.
We all know that Star Trek was all about the new world order, even the badges on the uniforms.
Also Star Trek got us more used to the idea of space travel, aliens and life on other planets.
The Klingons interest me. In the original series of Star Trek, the Klingons look different to they do now. Don't you think they look a bit 'reptillian' now?.
Now think of the Klingon language.
Do you find it strange that a race of beings from a television show have had a language 'created' for them?. And that this language is being taught at colleges and universities.
What if the Klingon language is actually the Reptilian language!.:eek:
[This guy seems to believe that Katy Perry and Zooey Deschanel are the same person, who is also porn star Ellie Idol, and it's a big conspiracy or something. Also, Heath Ledger and Joseph Gordon-Levitt, apparently...)
The first observation we should make is that the actor who plays Katy Perry also plays Zooey Deschanel. Apart from the obvious resemblance, their connection is revealed through both Gordon Joseph-Levitt (who dated Zooey Deschanel) and Russel Brand (who first hooked up with Katy Perry and then with Zooey). Both Gordon Joseph-Levitt and Russel Brand are fake personas. Zooey is most likely an earlier role for this actor, with the pertinent episodes of her life and film career shot earlier than would appear to us, because of other obvious differences related to the fireworks mentioned above. I think it is more shocking that this actor’s handlers would think that bust size alone would preclude us from making the connection that they are the same person how shallow do they think we are? I mean, haven’t they seen Your Highness (2011)? Zooey’s performance in her more recent movies (like My Idiot Brother) is rather muted and almost seems like there is something not right with her
So, working backwards, we can trace Katy Perry back to Zooey Deschanel. That’s not so bad, it’s not a crime for an actor to play multiple roles, unless the intention is subvert our liberties or affect our minds in a negative fashion.
But like the Angelina Jolie and Lady Gaga characters, we should be aware of the negative aspects of the entertainment industry to which this actor has been exposed, and to which I have alluded to and sifted through in earlier posts like parts 1-5 of Hollywood is Just a big Escort Service for the Elite.
Zooey Deschanel used to play the role of Ellie Idol.
[And from the comments section: "People have been saying Cobain is Rivers Cuomo for years. Lots of info out there about that, looks on to me. I think DGB said Kurt played Sid Vicious too, not sure if I see that. Kurt was usually the shortest guy in pics, and Syd the tallest. Did watch some video of Syd, and it's obviously a big act."]
I find it funny how few people see the obvious connection between sexual liberation (viewed as a good thing) and the increased sexual objectification of women (viewed as a bad thing). Now i know women have always been objectified, but today there's such an emphasis on 'being sexy', you have 10 year old girls trying to be sexy. Do some people, including feminists, want their want to have their cake and eat it to (i know stupid saying)? I mean if you wanna express your sexuality, fine, nothing against that, just don't act all prudish when men admire your assets, is all I'm saying. I'm not saying it's an invitation to rape, but you have to admit it promotes more lewd/animalistic behaviour, because thats our nature. Just look at music videos and porn being so mainstream...I'm not sure if I want to be a parent in this era...
[IDK. It sounds like your saying men aren't civilized and cant be expected to take responsibility for controlling their desires and actions therefore it is a woman's responsibility to suppress their own sexuality or its our fault if we are objectified.
While I agree our society has become more openly sexual I don't agree that it has increased the objectification of women. As you stated that has been going on since the beginning. If anything it has probably decreased the objectification and increased the empowerment as the naked female body is seen as less taboo.]
What does 'controlling their desires' mean though? If a man gets aroused at a woman in a bikini is that his fault? Now he can make the decision to force himself on her, but that would be wrong, but he'll still objectify her. That is just nature. But that's not even what I'm talking about. Women want to have sexual freedom, they like sex...yes, that's nothing new too...if they want to show off their body in such a sexual manner, have a lot of hook ups/be promiscuous, they have to expect men will lust after them, right? If they can accept that, then fine. The thing is, this will simply lead to self-worth being based more on looks and sexiness.
You seriously think women are less objectified now than in the past? Look at advertising, look at music videos, compare now and 100 years ago. One could argue that in some ways men respected women more 100 years ago, while in some ways they respected them less. It's a bit of both, but the sexual objectification is part of sexual liberation, whether we like it or not.
In that case women are objectified as much as ever. There are still women in beer commercial, Hooters girls, pretty but incompetent waitresses...it's not all one-sided, too...many women TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THIS, so I get sick of women always thinking it's the man's fault for this happening...that's what I'm talking about.
Women say 'we don't wanna be objectified', but they flaunt their sexuality and USE it for their own purposes. Not ALL (obviously) but a lot. And pop culture and society promote this, 'you can use your sex appeal to get to the top,' 'if you've got it flaunt it' attitude. Now do you get it?
Look at the timeline of history. Look at the dates of everything. The world wars, the founding of the ADL, NAACP and other Jewish actions. BET is owned by Jews.
You will know them by their actions. Look at the dates of The massive white genocide in Russia and the east.
Then fast forward all the way and look at the media, movies and porn. Look at feminism. Who created it and why. Look at how feminism isn't about women, it's about open borders to people who kill white women. Not a word.
Look at what happens when you elect a white man who says stop the invasion of the USA and Europe. Stop killing yourself, is enough to bring hell upon him. Why are they so concerned about Russia. Why do they want your guns, but want more gangs who use the guns to murder on a mass scale.
It all goes back to 100 years ago when they declared war against whites. Put it all together.
Propaganda Posing as Documentary
The new Netflix miniseries, When They See Us, brings the Central Park Five back into the limelight.
The Five were convicted of brutally gang raping a white jogger in 1989. Four were black, one Hispanic, and all were between the ages of 14 and 16. The case dominated New York City headlines and inspired Donald Trump to pay for pro-death penalty ads in the New York Times.
In 2002, a convicted serial rapist named Matias Reyes claimed sole responsibility. Mr. Reyes’s DNA was the only match to evidence from the crime scene. The state vacated the Five’s rape convictions, and in 2014, New York City awarded them $41 million. Liberals claim the case proves America’s justice system is racist. Yet many have shown there is plenty of evidence the suspects were involved in the crime.
When They See Us ignores that evidence. For black filmmaker Ava DuVernay, the Five were railroaded by police racism and a criminal prosecution.
The original incident took place on April 19, 1989, when more than 30 young blacks and Hispanics descended on Central Park for an evening of “wilding.” In the series they are just running through the park, having a good time.
Not so. “People were punched in the face and pulled off their bicycles and robbed of their watches,” says New Yorker writer Ken Auletta. They beat one white school teacher so badly police said he looked like he had been “dunked in a bucket of blood.”
The series does show a few people assaulting two people, but the Five are appalled and don’t join in. Brutal police officers chase and catch most of the suspects. One smashes 14-year-old Kevin Richardson’s face with a helmet.
Soon after the arrests, police find Patricia Meili, the raped jogger, almost dead. Sex crimes investigator Linda Fairstein suspects the young men attacked her and orders the police to get confessions. Police use physical force, lie, threaten, and deny food and toilet breaks. The suspects eventually break and confess to the rape; all but one confesses on camera.
Naturally, the justice system is racist. Outmatched in court, outwitted by racist cops, badly served by bungling lawyers, the Five are convicted because of the taped confessions. Four go to juvenile detention, and 16-year-old, Korey Wise, goes to adult prison. Five good-natured boys’ dreams are crushed by a vicious system.
The main villain is Linda Fairstein, an arrogant, blond-haired white woman who ignores evidence to get convictions. She’s what blacks call a “Beckzilla:” a white woman using her “privilege” to destroy non-whites. Miss DuVernay’s miniseries is so effective that the real Linda Fairstein lost her book publisher because of When They See Us—though she has now written her own defense against the series’ reckless portrayal.
The other villain is Donald Trump. He appears in old television interviews about the death penalty ads. The show insists he is racist and partly responsible for the unjust verdict. He personifies America’s racism and injustice.
The actors don’t look like the suspects. The short actor playing then-14-year-old Kevin Richardson looks younger than 14. Mr. Richardson looked much older than 14 in 1989, and was taller than his arresting officers. The series portrays the other four similarly.
The show claims the teenagers learned about the rape during interrogation, but some had mentioned it unprompted earlier. One said he “didn’t do the murder” but he knew who did (initially, the jogger was expected to die). Mr. Richardson told police “Antron [McCray] did it” before authorities even knew about the rape. In response to a joke that he should be out with his girlfriend, one teenager told a cop he “already got some.” As Raymond Santana was driven from one police station to another, he told police, “I had nothing to do with the rape. All I did was feel her tits.” A friend of Mr. Wise said he told her he held the victim down but did not rape her.
None of this is in the series, in which The Five stoutly deny they were involved.
In the series, the “wilding” is good-natured fun, but the Five were convicted of assaults that still stand. In a 2002 story casting doubt on the rape convictions, The Village Voice wrote:
It is important to remember, in any examination of the public record of this flawed investigation and prosecution, that even if these five youths, or at least some of them, were not guilty of rape or sexual assault, they were not innocents—having been convicted of a whole series of other crimes committed in the rampage that night. One need only recall that among those crimes, two men, John Loughlin and Antonio Diaz, were horribly beaten and left bleeding and unconscious.
One of The Five, Yusef Salam, testified in court that he brought a 14-inch metal pipe—a weapon used in the attackers—to the park that night, but the series downplays the “wilding.” In court, a stereotypical “Becky” complains that young blacks made weird sounds as she and her husband bicycled past them. The blacks in the audience guffaw at what is portrayed as petty and racist. In fact, Patricia Malone was almost raped. “It was actually terrifying,” she told ABC News last month. “They were ripping at my arms and legs and clothing. As a woman, you immediately wonder what’s going to happen.” She and her husband managed to get away.
The film gives a false impression of Mr. Wise’s time in prison. According to police, he became a prison gang leader. In the series, he is brutalized by gangs but never joins one.
There are also questions about the relationship between Mr. Wise, and the confessed rapist, Matias Reyes. Authorities think Mr. Wise’s gang may have intimidated Mr. Reyes into claiming sole responsibility. The two got into a fight early in Mr. Wise’s prison term, but in the series this is a dispute over a television.
The series claims Mr. Reyes decided to confess because of his new-found Christian faith, but police are skeptical. His past crimes included an attempted rape in a church. Mr. Reyes was already serving a life sentence for a brutal rape and murder, so an additional conviction made little difference to him.
The show treats Mr. Reyes’s confession as absolute fact, but this story is thin. He claims he caught the jogger on his own. Police doubted this because Miss Meili kept a 7-and-a-half-minute mile pace for her run; Mr. Reyes was chubby and unathletic. Mr. Reyes also claimed he attacked Miss Meili with a tree branch and a rock. She had what looked like cut wounds, but Mr. Reyes said he didn’t use a knife.
The doctors who saved the jogger’s life thought a group of men attacked her. Dr. Robert Kurtz told The Wall Street Journal in 2014 that “there had to be another individual or a group who inflicted injuries with a sharp-edged instrument if he [Reyes] only used a blunt object.” Dr. Jane Haher said there were visible handprints on Miss Meili’s thighs, calves, ankles, and behind her knees. She thinks “people held her legs down while somebody did this horrible act.”
At the time of the trial, authorities knew that at least one attacker had not been caught. As Central Park Five prosecutor Tim Clements explained to the New York Daily News last year, “We told the jury that the DNA that had been analyzed matched someone else. When Reyes came forward it was a relief. . . It’s not surprising that he (perhaps) was with this group or joined it later.”
Mr. Clements thinks the state should not have vacated the Five’s convictions: “I thought there were a lot of factual inaccuracies and some of the logic and the conclusions were faulty. The facts and the law supported the convictions. I was very disappointed that they vacated the convictions without even a hearing, without even an opportunity to question and examine Reyes.”
In When They See Us, aggressive white cops force the suspects to confess. The case’s lead officer, Eric Reynolds—who is black—strongly disputes this. “There was no coercion,” he told the New York Daily News in 2018. “If they all said the same exact things, then maybe I would think that. But they didn’t. Look at the video statements. They stand up and demonstrate [what happened].”
He also noted that the statements were obtained while Miss Meili was in a coma: “If we’re railroading them, how do we know when she comes out of the coma what story she’s going to tell? If you are trying to pin it on someone, why would you risk that she would say something different?”
Mr. Reynolds does not even appear in the series.
The prosecutor, Mr. Clements, also says there was no coercion. “Liz [Lederer, the lead prosecutor] was doing interviews in a room with an open ceiling,” he told the Daily News. “My job was to make sure everyone was quiet so the interviews wouldn’t be interrupted. There were parents present. In that situation, you can’t coach them, you can’t tell them what to do.”
The New York City Police Department re-investigated the case in 2002 and concluded there was no coercion. In the series, the main trick police use is to convince the suspects that if they confess to rape they can go home. Even a low-IQ 14-year-old knows that isn’t true. Why did the Five confess when the other suspects did not?
Mr. Reynolds, like many involved in the case, is incensed that the city settled without a trial. “If we had gone to trial in their lawsuit, we wouldn’t be having this conversation because all the facts would have come out,” he said. “It would have been clear they participated and Reyes didn’t act alone. The evidence supported it. They [the Central Park Five] did not want to go to trial. They just wanted to get paid.”
Prosecutor Clements also thinks that if there had been a new trial, the Five would have lost.
Another person who doesn’t like the settlement is the victim. “I so wish the case hadn’t been settled,” Miss Meili told ABC last month. “I wish that it had gone to court because there’s a lot of information that’s now being released that I’m seeing for the first time.” She still believes she was attacked by a group.
Of course, When They See Us leaves all this out. It has a simple message: our racist justice system framed five innocent young persons of color. It is propaganda posing as a documentary.
What if I told you that all the power the PC seem to have is nothing more than a superficial construct? They would have you believe that they are in control of the social media and everyone is on their side.
But that’s not true. Political Correctness is its own biggest lie. They make you think they can: destroy your reputation if you say the wrong thing, rewrite history, adjust our youth’s minds in an effort to support their agenda and you should conform because no matter what you say they are the ones in 90% of the schools and they determine the mindset of the next generation of voters.
Well here is a newsflash: that isn’t true anymore. Last year a secret revolution occurred that allowed republicans to win the midterms; and it’s the same reason why Donald Trump has retained so much support. Last year when sales of Grand Theft Auto V (the latest addition to the most Politically Incorrect video-game series of all time, Grand Theft Auto) reached nearly a billion dollars in on its first week on the shelves; the highest elites among the Politically fled from their thrones of influence.
Since then the PC have lost all influence on social websites such as YAHOO! No longer may user accounts be suspended for homophobic, sexist, or even racist comments. From this point the majority of the PC have devoted their time to social media trolling. But now the threat of the rise of the PC over the Video-game Industry, which will lead to the boycott and eventual banishment of the Politically Incorrect chauvinistic, sexist, racist, video-game series known as Grand Theft Auto, and a totalitarian conquering of this nation, must be countered with a new national conversation (White people are the real victims of slavery, Imperialism, racism).
From past observations of the PC Administrations of influential Campuses, they have been planning to destroy the video-game series known as GTA for a long time. One school principal threatened to call the police on parents that let their kids play Grand Theft Auto. And know the final piece in the prophecy has arrived. On November 10, 2015 the video-game known as Fallout 4 will be released.
These video-games may become a symbol for the left. They have already become a tool for spreading liberalism into the minds of our youth. Fallout was once the Post-Apocalyptic Pulp Fiction of video-games, but now it has become no more than a message for liberalism in general after the PC Bethesda Game Studios stole the copyrights to the Fallout series from its original developers Black Isles.
In Past years BGS has injected messages into its videogames: Green Peace/Animal welfare, Feminism, gay rights, racial equality, income equality, anti-war, anti-military, and more recently Marxism.
Here are the Leftist messages in the FO games:
Green Peace is about the world is coming to an end because of humanity and they put it right inside of a videogame that takes place after a nuclear war.
The very theme song of FO3 is a testament to the left- “I don’t want to set the world on fire”. This very song utters the doom and gloom over global warming and urbanization.
FO3 there is a NPC known as Harold who appeared in previous FO games. But when Harold appeared in BGS’s Capital Wasteland they just had to add a PC swing to him. In FO3 the character Harold (already exposed to Forced Evolutionary Virus and having a tree named Bob growing out of him) has become fused with tree growing out of him, his legs become roots. . He was discovered by several people who began to worship him as a god, and a small and exclusive cult known as the Treeminders began to form in secrecy. Bob began to blossom and many plants grew in this area, which became green with life, a stark contrast to the outer wasteland. Tree minders is just another term for Tree huggers, which is exactly what the new game designers from BGS are.
FO3 also uses fear tactics to promote alternative energy. FO3 scares gamers into becoming advocates of energy efficiency. After playing, gamers are likely to think that if we don’t move towards alternate sources of energy we’ll run out of oil and gas and our world leaders will nukes us over the last remaining natural resources.
FO3 storyline pertains to the fight for clean water, and echoes the fear expressed by those in California. The truth is that the agriculture industry uses over 80% of the water in California. Most of the water in California is being used to clean almonds. So any attempts to cut down on the amount of water used by residents will never solve the issue.
In FNV there is an area known as Hidden valley bunker, on the outside of the bunkers are peace symbols and messages that display the anti-nuclear war mentality of the 1960’s through 1990’s (Before it became about anti-toxic waste, save the whales, and human beings are the scourge to nature, and where all going to die because of manmade Global warming).
There are messages about income inequality that appear in both FO3 and FNV. Outside of Fallout shelters lay signs once carried by the now dead protesters who thought screw the wealthy 1% because they can afford to enter the bunkers.
Animal Welfare has appeared in the FO games since the beginning. Animal Welfare groups believe that animals should be protected. While the radicals, Animal Rights activist believe that animals should have the same rights as people.
The intelligent deathclaws in FO2 bring about the issue of Animal Welfare. Products of the Enclave’s experiments these deathclaws had the ability to talk and fight closely alongside humans. These creatures cause the player to feel sympathy, for at one point in time the player must destroy the base containing most of the intelligent deathclaws, and later an NPC ( non-playable-character) bombs the shelter made for the last remaining surviving intelligent deathclaws.
The Enclave also becomes a target for doing unethical experiments on animals in FO2 (An Enclave scientist works in a sound proof room because of the unsettling screams of his test subjects. The player in disguise of an Enclave Soldier, has the option to kill the scientist in complete secrecy because the room is sound proof)
The Animal Friend perk in multiple FO games is clear evidence of Animal Welfare. With this perk certain creatures never become hostile towards the player, who may not want to fight them in the first place. With the second perk, animals will come to your aid against non-animal enemies.
FO3 - there is a NPC known as Moria Brown, who is based off a real life Marine Biologist of the same name. The real Moria Brown is a hero of animal huggers, who watch shows like whale wars and channels like Animal Planet. The in-game Moria Brown is openly opposed to violence against the creatures of the waste.
Anti-Animal Welfare/Rights: To appear as a neutral game FNV has the thorn. In the thorn the user can wager money on creature fights, compete against creatures for money, and set up custom fights. The user can also embark on a series of quest focused on fetching eggs for the thorn. With each quest the type of creatures the player most take eggs from becomes deadlier.
FO3 Galaxy News radio is a propaganda machine that encourages players to fight the good fight and bring down the U.S paramilitary industrial complex (known as the Enclave).
FO3 quest Tenpenny Tower is an obvious reference to the civil rights movement. The ghouls represent important black figures throughout history. Hence one ghouls has the name Bessie, the same name as a well-known African American singer of the period of time in which people started to think about the social injustices.
FO3 - Civil War in the Brotherhood of Steel because the BOS wanted to help the people of the Capital Wasteland (unlike the Enclave, which is the true U.S Government as depicted in these games)
That one song that appear in FO3 Galaxy News radio loop that goes something like bongo bongo bongo I don’t want to leave the Congo oh no no no no no! fenko finko funko I don’t want to leave the jungle I refuse to go!... That song obviously represents the anti-urbanization ideology of the far-left green movement; If you listen closely to that song you’ll hear them singing about how they don’t like the bright lights of the flashy cities and the noise of cars in their ears ; and no matter what you say I’ll stay right here! Dun dah duda duda dah duhda! Deeeh!!!
FNV: The communist NCR faction in FNV was once a constitutional republic; until Bethesda made it into a totalitarian communist faction that seizes private property for annex and makes farmers work in communes.
FNV: Caesar’s Legion is just a subliminal message meant to turn male and female gamers into feminist by using women as slaves. Caesar’s Legion also represents the feminist view of Las Vegas as a disgusting town of ill repute where women are forced to use their bodies to please men. They could not have made it more evident.
Most of that is in the last 2 FOs alone. The Enclave in the FOs smears the line between the U.S and the Nazis.
The Greatest evidence that FALLOUTGATE is not a conspiracy:
Black Isles studios (the original Fallout developers) refused to completely conform to their PC PR team, for example the original and present day logo of FO is a white guy with blonde hair known as the vault boy that actually represents president John F Kennedy; who is popular among the populace as he is thought to have prevented the first Nuclear War during the Cuban missiles crisis; and the Brotherhood of Steel a paramilitary organization that appears throughout all of the Fallout games with the goals of protecting humanity from advanced technologies by hoarding them all to themselves represents Kennedys deep-seated interest in advanced technologies before his death .
But then they included a vault girl (for obvious reasons), and the one time the game designers from Black Isles try to include a logo that would appear in the karma status for evil players that killed children, It was omitted from the original game cause it was a sketch of the vault boy kicking a pregnant vault girl in the belly.
This situation caused a firestorm among their PC PR managers, and the designers ultimately omitted it from the game before its release. Not only was this sketch offensive to women because it demonized them for having abortions, the PC claim that black isles studios shouldn't have given players the power to kill children in the first place. In the 1990’s games like FO2 were more realistic, which made them feel more unethical, but they included ethical storylines in which the players fought against Nazi like enemies in the name of peace, liberty, and freedom.
BGS never allowed children characters to be killed in any of its games during the time of Black Isles. And sense then BGS (for its PC desire that video-games become something more than just mindless violence of uncensored proportions) has gained the copyrights to the FO games.
Since then all child characters in Bethesda games have become invincible (accept in the case of two’ carefully scripted situations’ in Fallout 3 involving an Undetonated nuke destroying an entire town (which can be prevented by the player who will becomes immediately idolized by locals afterwards) and a low orbit ballistic mini nuke strike capable of targeting only one of several optional locations based on the characters choice( one of which was an enemy air force base that was the intended target for that quest and the others being pedestrian zones and the final choice being the headquarters of the protagonist party of the game. But you never get to watch a child character die in real time. They don’t show it.
In FNV there is a character known as Mr. House that reforms squabbling tribes into civilized societies after a nuclear war. What Mr. House actually represents is how the PC transformed a collection of uncensored videogames and their companies into meaningful experiences for those people that would arrive from the American cultural wars prior to 9/11. If you really go through the game and look at what Mr. House really is in his true form, you will see an old grotesque being clinging on to life with the power technology, popularity, and his final ledger states that he just wanted to improve humanity. But just like Mr. House PC hides you from the truth to protect you and make you see the best of things, and when you finally see the true nature of reality and how it all works it is hideous. In a way Mr. House is a perfect representation of PC.
In a way FNV may have just been an entire game structured off of PC. From the Republic of Dave and Dukov’s place in FO3 (Which I’m pretty sure by all observations that Dukov was a representation of either older FOs or GTA hidden inside FO3 and Cherry is a representation of FO3 itself. Dave from the Republic of Dave mocks GTA, which does hog all the attention but still GTA deserves all of its popularity by its own accord) to Rose of Sharon Cassidy and the xenophobic artillery hogging, ammo hoarding, grenade lobbing, explosive loving group known as the boomers in FNV (which represents what the PC imagines when they think of republicans).
In FNV it all makes sense once you look hard enough. If you still don't believe me look at what Bethesda Games was prior to 9/11 (see Elder Scrolls 2 Daggerfall for more info).
The video game cultural objectified women up until that point but then they realized that this wouldn't work out well in a new and reformed world with empowered females that would for the first time start to become curious about video games.
You see the computer games of the 1990's were never meant to be played by girls or women because just like Las Vegas and Caesar’s legion in their game Fallout New Vegas, Bethesda Games objectified and exploited woman in their games for social misfits that were curious and felt the need to play out their Fantasies in exchange for profit.
Why else do you think old video games are always represented as Nintendo and arcade games? Because the history of computer games is one of erotic fantasy and lust of which the likes could not be tolerated in today's society.
Look at moder sties. The first video game modifications always include nudity and sex because computer gamers are obsessed with that kind of stuff. They were conditioned to love it buy the games of the 1990’s. On 11/10/2015 who would be willing to spend their money on the PC anti-slavery, Marxist videogame Fallout 4? At the end of the day it’s about money. But no one really hates the ideas of slavery, because it made this nation, and no one is going to buy that video-game Fallout 4.
On paper it sound good, you walk around trying to improve a post-apocalyptic society while fighting slavery and liberating the underdogs of the new world. But that’s not right. The truth is for a world to begin again there has to be slavery and imperialism.
Some of you like video-games like this, you think in what world is the greatest nation formed off of centuries of slavery and mass genocide. But in time you’ll come to the conclusion that there is no real need for Political Correctness and Slavery is not that bad. When you go to bed to night you will not spread the message of #Fallout4Equality via social media.
This video-game will not become a symbol for the left. And all of the other disturbances that have occurred on the internet in the past weeks over this issues will be resolved and all will return to normal. I have several points that prove why Fallout 4 will not sale in one month, enough copies to beat the two day sales record of Grand Theft Auto V.
And on November 10, 2015 I will prove that black lives, LGBT rights, women’s rights, and all other social injustice hoaxes are non-issues when the most PC videogame of all time doesn't reach a billion dollars in sales on its first week on the shelves. And then we will know that Political Correctness is just an unnecessary joke that we don’t need in our private lives.
They aren’t the majority
In the Culture War between the PC and the Video-game industry, the PC are not just the 1%, but the .0000001%. The social minorities that they would look to for support love to play GTA. That’s why it sold 880 million in just 2 days. And GTA is just one of many video-games. The PC war with the video-game culture, Is as futile as trying to westernize the entire Middle East in 1 year without the use of violence. It’s like trying to peacefully colonize the most diehard, nationalistic, society via PC. It won’t work.
The PC are not attracting the correct audience to their video-games
Most of the PC in the gaming industry are the social majority that prefer RPGs.
I want to do tinder experiments with normies and post the results. Can we agree on what an average normie looks like?
Links to an instagram account of what a normie looks like would be useful.
I just want some vague normie ideal agreed upon by high post count users so when I post the results, too many people won't claim they're bunk becaues the normies weren't good looking enough.
Can we agree on what an average normie looks like? No, I really don't think we can. So it's gonna have to be up to you. What do you see when you go outside? Do you see what you would call normies?
Can we agree on what an average normie looks like? No, I really don't think we can. So it's gonna have to be up to you. What do you see when you go outside? Do you see what you would call normies?Fat balding guys in their 20s
so I have a feeling I'll have to use a 6/10 with a full head of hair or else everyone will call him too ugly to be a normie
basically a borderline chad-lite
invisible jaw, nonthreatening eye area, 6' or lower mostly
even if you get any matches, its not proof of success. Females will match with non-chads out of boredom to see what happens, also for free food. If the female is poor, they will match with normies to look for a suitable betabuxx
the only indicator for success is if sex occurs.
normies might have 2-3 minor flaws along with 2-3 decent features, or else everything is pretty bland. use someone who looks somewhat similar to the AVM morph.
Re: And they wonder why we rope😞
[1st scene: A lonely boy character looks at a couple, thinking “Why do women only like stupid jerks who treat them like shit?”
2nd scene: A lonely girl character, next to the lonely boy, thinks “WHERE DID ALL THE HOT GUYS GO?”
3rd scene: The man of the attractive couple looks at the lonely girl, thinking “Why can’t I get her attention?”
4th scene: The lonely girl has joined the couple, the lonely boy has a rope around his neck]
Foids saying that we reject our looksmatch for stacey is nothing but pure projection
That may have been true in the trad past, where only asset of the foid was her looks and domestic skills, and looks of the man didn't really matter much(compared to his providing ability) and losing your virginity before marriage was not an option if you didn't want to become an outcast. That's the literally only scenario a man rejects his looksmatch for Stacy
Fucking feminists pieces of shit. Not one single subject can they stop lying about how le women are oppressed.
Most women are innately submissive and Western civilisation was better unified when gender roles were the clearly accepted norm.
Also, I don’t think women were ever oppressed, men and women had to work in tandem to survive and get to where we are today.
an "oppressed" group that has never had to work for their living jfl
> Tfw no shy cutie that secretly loves me.
we be making memes and stuff but this is how we really feel
TFW no cute GF that ask how our day was
Those don't exist. As soon as a Chad gets close, she turns into confident low-inhib Stacy. I knew a girl like this.
Lmao at this Becky cope, Chad doesn’t secretly like you, he’ll fuck you but then he won’t talk to you again, and why should he when he has hot Stacies that chase him around?
The hot steam of a deadline breathes down your neck. It’s two o’clock in the morning, and you are alone in your office completing a last-minute project. As you viciously beat away at the keyboard, you pause and turn to the Internet as a resource. While browsing the Web, you notice an ad: “Free Porn.” You look at the popup appalled, yet intrigued.
In the isolated dark office, sin disguises itself as “free” free of cost, free of accountability, and free of consequences. Don’t believe the lie. Deconstructing the phrase “Free Porn” may save your marriage and ultimately your relationship with Christ. Here is a truth we desperately need today: There is no such thing as free porn.
Free Porn Is False Advertisement
Satan, the world, and the flesh combine to make a perverse, yet persuasive marketing firm. Satan is the source and father of lies (John 8:44). The world is under his control (1 John 5:19), and the flesh swindles us to believe God may be mocked while our hearts deceive us as well (Galatians 6:78; Jeremiah 17:9). It is clear then that spiritual warfare has much to do with battling the lies of this unholy trinity. It should not surprise us that Satan, the world, and our own flesh feed us lies to enhance the temptation of sin.
A wise Puritan said, “Satan presents the bait and hides the hook.” He is a crafty enemy that presents immediate pleasure, yet hides catastrophic consequences. There are few lies greater today than the myth that porn is free.
There is always great cost in viewing porn. It is never free. It always costs money. It will always demand we surrender integrity. It will always force the corruption of Christ-centered character. Many men have paid for so-called “free porn” with salty tears, broken marriages, and hours of counseling. Many women have paid for so-called “free porn” with vicious memories, broken bodies, and shattered souls.
God frees us by giving us the truth (John 8:32). The simple truth is that porn always costs us dearly, and it is never a victimless crime. Peer-reviewed research suggests that porn is highly addictive, negatively affects our behavior, and functionally operates as a destructive drug.
Porn has also been proven to ruin marriages, stress relationships, and decrease the desire for true intimacy with monogamous mates. In other words, porn kills relationships and diminishes our very being.
Porn also leaves a trail of tears and scarred victims. Many in the porn industry have testified of disease, drugs, violence, rape, and even sexual trafficking plaguing the business.
And above all, porn dishonors God. It perverts the sacred creation of God and exchanges it with lust, selfishness, and greed. What God created for good, porn perverts for evil. It takes his good gift of sex and devalues it. Porn makes sex about deviant pleasure, cheap romance, and gross satisfaction.
God intends sex to be so much more. God created sex for the purpose of cultivating intimacy between a man and his wife, and to be the means by which the blessing of children arrive. It is no coincidence, then, that both children and marriage are now devalued in today’s porn-ified culture.
Freedom in Jesus
Porn is sinful, and the saying about sin is still true: It will cost you more than you can pay and make you stay longer than you can stay. Sin is not controllable or stagnant. Sin is decadent. First you are walking in sin, then you are standing in sin, and before you know it you are sitting in it (Psalm 1:12). The same is true with porn. You think you can quit whenever you want. But you can’t. Porn is increasingly addictive, readily available, and like any other addiction more is needed the longer the practice continues. For many, porn has evolved from a curious click into a crippling addiction.
Here is the good news: There is freedom from “free porn” in Christ Jesus. The false security, enslaving escape, and luring lust of porn will only leave you empty. But in the good news of redemption in Christ, we find concrete security, promised perseverance, and true water that quenches the soul.
In Christ, we find the intimacy we truly desire as reconciled children to an almighty Father. In Christ, we find the free offer of grace that comes without any strings attached or any webs that deceitfully entangle us into bondage.
May Jesus truly set you free with the true freedom that exposes the lie of free porn.
If you’re ignoring the JQ, you’re wasting your time and might as well quit conspiracy research altogether.
Be forewarned, this will be lengthy.
Let me preface this by saying, if your gut reaction to someone bringing up the JQ is to screech “anti-Semite! Nazi!” then you are as brainwashed as the average MSM-watching average Joe who honestly believes Muslim highjackers brought down the World Trade Center. Literally no important distinction to be made in terms of critical thinking skills. You just have more diverse interests.
Acknowledging the JQ and its role in the events of the past, present and future, and its critical importance to almost all the conspiracy topics people have examined, does not make one a racist, anti-Semite, Notzee or any other buzzword created by the establishment to silence truth-tellers. Being a “Jew-hater” is absolutely not a prerequisite for honest examination of the JQ. Though, admittedly, the more information you absorb pertaining to the JQ, the easier it becomes to start thinking like those awful NOTZEES.
With that out of the way... The history of destructive Jewish behavior and contempt for non-Jews goes all the way back to before the time of Jesus Christ. The annals of (unsanitized) history are so full of examples of Jewish destruction that there is probably no single other subject that features so prominently. This is not a conspiracy, it’s fact. Jews have been expelled from over 100 countries throughout history. It’s safe to say, if you keep moving to a new neighborhood, and every time you do you’re thrown out, at some point you can’t blame your neighbors anymore. Their patterns of behavior and activities have forever remained unchanged, and everywhere they went, they wreaked havoc on the native population.
Also not a conspiracy, is the disproportionate presence Jews have in all the important sectors of western societies. Banking, media, academia, education, big pharma, publishing, federal agencies, the judiciary, big tech/Silicon Valley, and on and on and on. That a group comprising 2% of the American population wields the levers of power and influence to such an extent that they make decisions and exert influence over nearly all our country’s affairs almost exclusively, should in itself be off-putting to anyone with a highly-functioning brain. Again, this is not conspiracy theory, it is an easily verifiable fact.
Having established this fact, it stands to reason that most, if not all, of the conspiracies we study and discuss have behind them Jewish power players and Jewish influence. It also stands to reason that these actors behind the scenes driving these conspiracies are not acting on behalf of others, or towards the best interests of people or groups whose role in the major goings-on in our society and world are lesser than their own.
The next thing you must ask yourself is, what historical patterns are these people known for, and what are they working towards? What types of societal characteristics benefit them and reflect those patterns seen throughout history in other nations where they assumed powerful and influential roles? Who stands to gain from this conspiracy or that conspiracy, and in what way? And do those groups who stand to gain have a peculiarly ethnic profile? Go down the list of some of the major, future-altering conspiracies of the last, say, half century or so. Did the aftermath of those events produce favorable conditions or outcomes predominantly for one group of people? Name names, and the answer becomes clear.
When you take an honest look at the current state of affairs in the US and Europe, and you examine historical patterns, along with the groups and individuals spearheading these societal shifts, conspiracy theory becomes common sense. When you examine the former Weimar Republic, for example, and compare it with the transformation our western societies have undergone, they are shockingly similar. And the group driving those transformations is the same.
What one must understand about the Jews is, 99% of the time, their interests are antithetical to those of the host nation and population at large. At best, they consider themselves as “the other,” or perpetual outsiders, which influences their desire to disrupt homogeneous societies. It’s how they believe they protect themselves. At worst, however, consider their attitude towards Gentiles broadly, and white European Gentiles more specifically. Again, as a matter of historical fact, and their own words, values, cultural traditions, and most glaringly their “religious” doctrine (which, by the way, even non-religious Jews base their entire value system on). This is not conspiracy theory, though it can be said that not every Jew on Earth operates this way. Nevertheless, the cohesive group-mentality dictates every part of the Jew’s life, even those who do not consider themselves devout in this regard. They are all spiritually connected regardless of how strong their religious or cultural ties to the group are. All of this is a matter of historical record.
When you hear all the usual culprits thrown around in conspiracy circles — Illuminati, Freemasons, globalists, Bilderbergs, deep state, the corporations, etc — they’re used as nothing more than empty buzzwords to skirt the task of naming names and taking an honest look at the real issues. All these entities consist of, or are proxies for, Jews and Jewish interests. With adequate research, the Jewish connections to these groups is undeniable.
The French Revolution, the Bolshevik Revolution, the failed revolution in Germany around the same time, the Holodomor famine in Ukraine, World War I, World War II, the Vietnam War, the various conflicts in the Middle East during the decades after Israel was established, the Iraq war, the war in Afghanistan, the complete annihilation of Libya, the attack on the USS Liberty, 9/11, and almost every other major conflict in modern history was instigated by, fought for, or benefited almost exclusively Jews and/or Israel.
If you can come up with a reasonably plausible endgame for TPTB, taking into consideration all the various conspiracy subjects you’ve studied, and you envision that coming to fruition, I challenge you to lay out an explanation for how the Jews as a group do not stand to gain the most. Or, at the very least, I challenge you to arrive at that endgame in a way that does NOT include, in large part, Jewish machinations and Jewish power.
No matter where you look, their influence and presence is there. They control nearly all the means to which we continue to spiral into a tyrannical dystopia. It’s simply impossible to ignore, and therefore without the Jewish Question playing a central role in all these conspiracies we dig into, one is getting an incomplete picture at best, and is being willfully ignorant and dishonest at worst.
I could get into the details of Judaism specifically and its grotesque, hate-filled blueprint for world domination over all us “lesser than cattle” goyim; I could get into the vile and cruel things they teach about Gentiles and the ways in which those tenets are manifesting themselves in our world; I could get into specific examples of them acting out the Talmud in real life throughout history. But this post is long enough as is.
Whether you think all Jews subscribe to these ideas or not, and whether or not you believe the big picture isn’t in and of itself an explicitly Jewish conspiracy of world domination, you cannot with any honestly exclude the JQ from its rightful place in nearly all the conspiracy subjects we delve into.
We are so very close....I fully expect the next moment to forever change us all!!
I could see CERN..He was showing me this indeed has A LOT to do with some of the events unfolding...first I could see demons...not just demons but horrific looking things like we have never seen before..there in deep space I could see holes being made by this machine for them to come through.... I was trying to see if they appear before the 3 days of darkness because in the past I have seen them coming during the darkness. I think we may see some before the darkness hits. This CERN will make the sky wave..like vibrate...that is indeed what will cause us to see colorful waving skies...this will change everything in our atmosphere and throw everything off whack! I am sensing there will be bombs that go off right before the CERN machine is started up and everything will snowball from there...the colors in the sky, the planet, the collision of the planet, the red skies, earth shaking and volcanoes going off...then 3 days of darkness. Once you start to see or sense demons arriving it is time to stay in your home...this would be only days before the darkness hits!!
(Hope note - I asked Lisa some questions and she added this)
The sky was black
but I felt it was far out in space, not that it was darkness here necessarily
there were MANY holes all over being made MANY!! These things then could drop right through them
.they were not alien looking..but more demonic creatures!! I actually had the feeling we would be able to see at least some of these. I could see stars like the galaxy where the were coming in but don’t know if they were by one constellation or all over
because there were many I am thinking all over
?? I did not see any other planets
just stars where the holes were.
I don’t know how quickly after starting the machine will we see waves I could just see the sky moving and knew this machine was doing this. I didn’t see anything pertaining to the eclipse so IDK if it is before, after or even AT that time. ??
(Hope note - I am thinking that perhaps her husband saw this in his Oct 09, 2014 vision below...just my thoughts though. Here are pictures from Lisa...she says "There are what these things looked like."
Handle this demon like any other demon. Cast him OUT, in the name of Jesus. Go to a THESAURUS and look up DEPRESSION. All the names listed are names of demons. Cast them OUT too.
DEPRESSION IS A DEMON
Handle this demon like any other demon. Cast him OUT, in the name of Jesus. Go to a THESAURUS and look up DEPRESSION. All the names listed are names of demons. Cast them OUT too.
What I take issue with is what feminism has done to the woman. In my opinion, (again, I stress that this is only an opinion) feminism has taken away femininity from the woman. Let's start with looks: how many women do you know that actually dress like women? Most women these days wear jeans or shorts, plain t-shirts, and sneakers. I would guess that 99.9% of women wear pants at work. I'm not even talking about the lack of modesty- I'm just referring to the lack of femininity in women's looks today. There is a small percentage of women who do put on makeup and take the time to look attractive, but that in itself is a whole 'nother can of worms, and I'm not opening that up today. I'm not promoting the etiquette schools of the past, but I am wondering where our lady-likeness has gone.
Next issue: Behavior. Nowadays, women feel the need to compete with men in every area of life, including binge-drinking. If a woman can guzzle down a six-pack, the men around her will surely be quite impressed! Young women think nothing of being loud and rowdy in a restaurant or any public place. It is totally acceptable for everyone at Starbuck's to hear a girl describe every detail of her date the previous night to her girlfriends. What about sports? Aside from football, I don't know of any sport that women don't participate in. You might say that's great, but I don't see the point of women playing basketball. Be honest- do any of these ladies look lady-like? Even bodybuilding has its fair share of women. Do any of those bodybuilders even look like women anymore? I sure don't think so! They're more muscular than most men!
Third issue: Career. Here's where it gets really controversial. Let me start by saying that if a woman is in a financial position where she needs to work, no one can fault her for it. I'm not referring to these women. What I would like to call attention to is the women who choose to work. What influenced your decision, ladies? Was it something that was always expected of you? Sadly, most of us were trained to expect a glamorous work career at the end of our college career. Did anyone train us to primarily want to raise a family? [...] To me, it's no wonder why so many families are dysfunctional today. There are too many things pulling the parents apart, and women in the workplace is a big part of it. Not to mention all of the adultery going on! Cheating would be much less prevalent if women weren't working with men! [...] Yes, you might be a career woman with a comfortable income and a nice title after your name, but who's raising your children? The nanny or the television? Who is home to greet them with a smile and a hug when they walk in the door after school? as a result of spending so much time and effort at work, does your house feel like a home? Does it have that magical energy of warmth and love that only a woman can give it? Or is it a house that your family uses to eat and sleep in until life begins all over again the next day?
Ladies, I am aware that many of you might be upset and even angry with what I wrote. My intention is not to make anyone feel bad, only to present information that will cause you to question your ideals. Do you want to be a real feminist? Then take back your home! Take back your family! Go against what society forces you to believe in. Be a woman who thinks outside of the box. Real feminism is about being the most incredible woman you can be. It's not about trying to be as much like a man as possible. But if you think about it, that's what feminism is to most people. How ironic! If you're a feminist, that means you're trying to live your life like a man as much as possible! This is exactly the antithesis of feminism!
[Submitter’s note: He’s talking about this video]
And guess what? Not only women have butts, but men too.
It’s interchangeable, we both have it. If I can sexualise the butt to you, and then feed you free porn of anal sex, do you know what I’ve done?
I have acclimatised you, warmed you up, to homosexual sex.
Cause a man can have a big butt too. A hole’s a hole, right? You’ve got that female booty hole, a man has it too. We’re going to put that butt in your face, we’re going to create sexual desire, of the butt. So we can now interchange it.
And you won’t even notice. You will still… your lust for the butt will be satisfied. Whether it’s from a woman, or a man.
Why do you think anal sex in porn is so popular?
You think it’s an accident? You think it’s taboo? No, there’s an agenda behind it.
That’s why you have a video, a three-minute video, of only butts. Where’s the - did you even notice? Was there a breast in it? Yeah, the girls were wearing bikini tops, but the camera didn’t focus on it.
You don’t remember one breast from that clip, but you remember all the jiggling butts, ass to ass…
I officially declare myself a boob man. I am all about the boobs. Because being a butt man is just a gateway to homosexual activity.
I think the reason the Lord would frown upon *toys* is because of where the use of them would eventually lead. Such as, how many young men started out harmlessly looking at porn on the Internet. Soon had the drive to go even further, started looking at child porn, then wanted to know what it is actually felt like to be with a child. Then thier parents leave them alone with their baby sister one night.............
GOD hid hundreds, if not thousands, if not millions of world life events in the bible codes!
For example - In Isaiah 53 - Found in the codes are - JESUS' name as the Messiah, the 12 apostles, the 3 Marys, Pilate, and many other real life people who had to do with JESUS too.
Found in the bible codes would be world events, modern events and even smaller events for example --->>>> My friend David's name is in a bible code, with his wives name Mary crossing his name, with their marriage date crossing both their names!
Just think about it. GOD put both of their names in the bible crossing each other, now their marriage date crosses their names. This is just one single tiny tiny tiny example of the possible millions of bible codes found in the bible!
I share this with the atheists but guess what? It wont work! They still will not believe. They still reject JESUS and the holy bible!
This is the real reason why the fat assed numales around Reddit hate incels so much
(Why do you think guys who look like this hate incels the most?
Because they know when they come for the incels,
It's gonna be hard to tell the difference.)
"Saudi royal family" = bunch of illuminati actors same as Bin Laden's family
Unlike the totally staged "Bin Laden family" some of the "Saudi royals" are indeed related. But that's only a detail.
Fake deaths: Agendas behind the timing for "King Abdullah dead":
- to divert sunnis from staged YEMEN coup.
- to have shia muslims swallow the "end times" illuminati script. In other words: Why the "dead" actor playing 90 years old was named Abdullah, his successor has the name of an animal (Salmon) and the second in line is again called Abdullah.
- set the stage for the end of the "oil price keeps falling" psy-op.
- set the stage for the resurrection of Osama Bin Laden at the Temple Mount, Jerisalem, attached to a Boeing 777.
- have the successor put an end to the theater "Saudi sunni vs Iran shia". In other words: have saudi population swallow the coming joint operation of US and Iran military to recapture Mosul, Iraq.
- celebrate the terror state, with a pilgrimage to Mecca of every other puppet to "pay respect to the good King". That's why days earlier a blogger was lashed and a womnan beheaded in public.
Illuminati media (Wall Street Journal):
U.S., Iraq preparing for assault to recapture Mosul:
Reductionism: for the correct title, replace one char: Q with N.
Hours before the Saudi King's "death", more theater south of the border: Yemen president resigns.
"End times" alias "End of the show" illuminati script - for the shiia human cattle
Illuminati actors playing Shiite scholars:
Abdullah's death will mark the beginning of a chain of great events that will shock the world.
According to Shiite hadiths, after the death of a king named Abdullah in the Hijaz a western region of present-day Saudi Arabia no successor to the throne would be accepted, and disagreements would escalate and persist until the rise of Imam Mahdi.
Mahdi being the final Imam who disappeared, or went into occultation. Mahdi will be revealed only in the end-times, along with Jesus, to deliver peace to the world.
According to the book "250 Signs Until the Appearance of Imam Mahdi," Prophet Muhammad said: “On doomsday, a man who is carrying the name of an animal ascends to the throne, after which a man named Abdullah comes to the power. Whoever informs me of his death, I will inform him of the rise [of Mahdi]. After Abdullah passes away, for several days and months, the government will appear.”
600 members of the Bin Laden family = 600 students at Sandy Hook elementary school = ZERO
After reading this ...
... you'll only click again "news" about "Shiia Iran ayatollahs vs sunni royal saudi family" if you are one of these:
2015 Jan: YEMEN: staged coup is the same script as:
2014 Feb: Ukraine and Thailand protests: STAGED riots in Parallel scripts, new dimension in simulated reality
Why oil price is half of its average production cost in the USA: - for dummies
Two main reasons:
1. From "Putin" to Iran, from Saudi Arabia to Nigeria: ALL illuminazi puppets transferring as much oil as they can to illuminati depots.
2. The oil futures currently being traded are not meant to be actually supplied.
Illuminati jokes in black is white format:
- actor who has been playing 90 years old King during the last years "dies" with a black beard.
- Scott Walker stepped on stage days earlier with a a white beard to play "leader of Al-Qaeda in Yemen claims responsability for Paris Charlie Hebdo attack".
I am against eye-shadow in public as this is a seductive look that ought to be reserved for intimacy between a husband and wife alone. That's just my opinion. I also think it is wrong for teenagers girls to be decked-out like prostitutes. Lip gloss is worldly. Walt Disney dresses young girls up to look like prostitutes. Teenage girls should not be allowed to wear makeup, high heels, or expensive jewelry until they're 18 in my Christian opinion. Walt Disney has successfully turned a generation of young girls into lascivious whores and sex-perverts. I have a right to my opinion, and I think the Walt Disney Corporation is of the Devil.
Earrings are certainly appropriate; but not if they hang down several inches. Also, I think multiple earrings in one ear are a worldly look and should not be worn by Christian women. A woman with 5 or 6 earrings in her ear is worldly. Nose and body piercings are worldly as well. I would refrain from diamonds and expensive looking jewelry that draws attention to itself. I think gold or diamond wedding bands are the exception to the rule, which are acceptable if they appear expensive. Such a token of love and commitment is supposed to be bright and let every man know that a woman is taken. Of course, I wouldn't wear such expensive jewelry walking down the street; but to church should be safe. I think pearls are fine too, but not too many of them or you'll look like a giant clam.
I think dying one's hair a different color is fine and acceptable; but green, orange, blue or other strange colors for hair are worldly. Some women must wear makeup or a wig or dentures due to health problems, which is fine.
Also, tattoos are worldly and should never be placed upon one's body. A popular trend nowadays is for whorish women to have tattoos placed on their lower back. This is wrong.
I think plastic surgery is bad. Breast implants are ridiculous and are associated with many health problems; not to mention they're simply not natural. We are living in a nuthouse society where one's looks are all that matters. We are bombarded with worldly sayings like... "get the look" or "own the room" or "impress your friends." I got those from a recent Home Depot TV commercial of all places. American society has gone insane with body worship. So, in this whacko sex-perverted environment, it is important for Christian ladies to be careful how they dress, as to not contribute to the sexual promiscuity of our time. Certainly, Christian women don't have to wear sackcloth; but "baggy is better" is my motto.
(In response to "Has anyone lost something big via the Mandela Effect?")
I am going anonymous on this one; I don’t want people I know thinking I am crazy. My experience isn’t as big as your question is asking, but I believe it is bigger than average. This might take a bit to sort out the multiple levels of a Mandela effect
In my senior year of high school, we watched a movie: Of Mice and Men. This was based on the classic novel of John Steinbeck. This movie starred Bill Fagerbakke (playing Lennie) and Gary Sinise (playing George). Most people know the name “Sinise,” but they might not remember Fagerbakke. Fagerbakke is perhaps best known for his role on television show Coach. He played the role of the aging “dumb jock” that could never graduate, and sort of transitioned into a member of the football staff. Fagerbakke is on the far right in the picture below.
When I watched this movie for the first time in my senior class, I remember thinking that Fagerbakke was the perfect actor to play the role of Lennie; Lennie is a mentally challenged character in the Steinbeck classic. If you can imagine, Fagerbakke looked similar to an overgrown Dennis the Menace with his blond hair, and wearing the old blue jean overalls. In fact, this movie was such a hit, that Fagerbakke and Sinise would work together again a few years later in a movie of Stephen King’s The Stand. Once again, Fagerbakke played a mentally challenged character. Further, Of Mice and Men was obviously an inspiration landing him this next role. In fact, he even wore blue jean overalls in this movie as well. From The Stand, Fagerbakke is pictured to the right, below.
Now, the weirdness begins:
In 1994 or 1995, my wife and I watched Of Mice and Men together. She would often pick up movies on her way home and we would watch them together. I was excited to watch the movie and I told her how much I enjoyed watching it again and that we had also watched it my senior year of high school. Here is the first problem: She reminded me that I had graduated high school in 1988 and that this movie was released in 1992. I said, “But that isn’t possible!” You can imagine the long conversation we had over that. It bothered me, but what could I do? Reading the box, it CLEARLY stated 1992. How could I have watched something four years prior to it being released? Of course, there was nothing I could do, and there was nothing to be done; I simply had to let it go. On a lighter note, we both at least had a lengthy discussion about how Fagerbakke was perfect for the role because of his acting on Coach.
So, this little incident had bothered me for many years. From time to time over the years, the conversation would come up again. I was always lightheartedly dismissed as “mistaken.” More recently though, I hadn’t thought about this incident for many years. But then “The Mandela Effect” had been gaining in popularity. I had dismissed it as a common psychological phenomenon. In my opinion, it is intuitive that most people wouldn’t notice C3PO’s subtle silver leg, a wrong quote from Star Wars, an unusual spelling, etc. Taking The Mandela Effect seriously was something I judged as silly. Regardless, it was at least interesting to read about, but not something I would take seriously.
A couple of nights ago, I was reading more about The Mandela Effect, and I suddenly remembered the “Of Mice and Men incident.” I was still disturbed by watching a movie in 1988 that came out in 1992. Being curious, I decided to do some googling and I was VERY surprised at what I found:
The movie doesn’t exist! Everything I have written above, every high school memory, didn’t happen! Further, the discussion I had with my wife about how Fagerbakke was perfect for the role never happened! Oh, there WAS a movie! It DID come out in 1992! Gary Sinise WAS in it. But, Fagerbakke wasn’t in it!
Let me repeat that. Fagerbakke WASN’T in the MOVIE! John Malcovich played the role of Lenny! Sinese and Malcovich are pictured below.
Let all of this sink in: Me watching the movie in high school in ’88 with Fagerbakke never happened. Talking with my wife in ’94 or ’95 about Fagerbakke’s acting while also misremembering a ’92 movie never happened. Numerous conversations through the years about misremembering the YEAR certainly happened, yet numerous conversations through the years of Fagerbakke’s never happened!
Further, I also discovered that the show Coach didn’t come out until 1989.
But I was there! I “know” what I remember! Or do I?
In my opinion, any ONE of these events is disturbing. But the collection of them all together! The MULTIPLE conversations through the years about it!
I tend to believe that there is something to learn here. I think it may be more a symptom of how our minds really work, how SERIOUSLY unreliable memory can truly be, and far LESS of any evidence for some paranormal or superordinary phenomenon. But the jury is still out, and I am still disturbed by it.
I am smarter than nearly all the girls I’ve ever known.
That’s not arrogance talking: it’s the truth. Out of all the girls I’ve known, maybe three were at least as smart as me, and of that three, one is more intelligent than me. All the rest were my intellectual inferiors. I don’t hold it against them; in fact, when I run across girls who tout their “intelligence,” I feel nauseous, like I’m dealing with a pack of overeager Mormon missionaries.
One of the most dangerous delusions of modern America is the idea that girls are desirable because of how smart they are. Indeed, the idea that intelligent girls even exist in significant numbers is ridiculous. Puffed up by you-go-grrl propaganda from the media, their heads filled with lies from the universities, every girl who can spell her own name suddenly thinks she’s Einstein. Worst of all, girls think that being able to spell their own names entitles them to a good man, even when they’re bossy, defiant and lacking in feminine graces.
This is laughable.
The reality is that truly intelligent females are rare, and most girls who consider themselves “smart” are not. More importantly, the idea that men should find female intelligence attractive is as preposterous as expecting them to find hermaphroditism sexy. A girl’s most important aspects will always be her beauty, her charm and her willingness to please, with intelligence so far down the list that it might as well not be on the list.
Yet thanks to white knights artificially pumping up the egos of every girl in America, men are made to feel like freaks for considering a girl’s bust size to be more important than her ability to regurgitate Marxist tripe.
Here are my reasons why female intelligence is a fraud.
1. Few girls are actually intelligent.
This is the most important thing to know: intelligence is largely a masculine attribute. IQ testing has consistently shown that while men and females have the same mean intelligence, men have a wider standard deviation while females cluster around the middle. In layman’s terms, this means that there are more intelligent men than there are intelligent girls. At the same time, it also means that there are more unintelligent men then unintelligent girls, which is why the short bus tends to be a sausage fest. The “dumb bimbo” stereotype is a fiction invented by ugly girls.
Turns out that “boys go to Jupiter to get more stupider, girls go to college to get more knowledge” was at least half true.
This is why it’s a waste of time for smart men to cast about for a girl who is their intellectual equal: she simply doesn’t exist. You have a better chance of talking Zooey Deschanel and Ellen Page into a threesome than finding a girl who can match you in knowledge, life experience and all-around brains. You do find the occasional woman who can hold her own with men, but these exceptions don’t disprove the rule, any more than the existence of Kim Peek disproves the fact that most autistics are hand-flapping retards.
What’s really awful about this situation is that the mainstream media, invested in hiding the truth, blame men for not being able to find the right girl. “You’re looking in the wrong places.” “Intelligent, classy girls don’t hang out at bars.” “Maybe you just attract the wrong kinds of people.” They can’t simply admit that females are the passive sex, built for raising babies and not much else, because doing so might hurt girls’ self-esteem
and we can’t very well have that, now can we?
2. Girls are intellectually inferior.
Several months ago, I was on Twitter killing time when some teenage girl started sending rude and insulting Tweets at me because she was offfeeennnded at my article on why most girls shouldn’t bother going to college. I initially ignored her, but when she continued to harass me, touting her “4.0 GPA” and how smart she was, I clicked through to her profile and did a little research. Turns out that this oh-so-intelligent young lady was spending $58,000 a year to major in acting. Furthermore, while she was not unattractiveshe had a good bone structure, a cute face and huge tracts of landshe was at least twenty pounds overweight, so several of my followers started calling her fat. What was her response?
She started sending pictures of herself to me in an attempt to prove she wasn’t fat.
This girl wasn’t stupid; she was clearly four or five points above the mean female IQ. But not only did she massively overrate her intelligence, she was unwilling to accept that maybe, just maybe, she had made some poor choices in life.
That is the modern “intelligent” girl; an intellectual vacuum. Her life one great big fraud from beginning to end. Despite her vaunted “smarts” and her belief that she can “do anything,” she doesn’t major in math, engineering, computer programming or any discipline that requires actual work. No, she picks a soft major like English, education or ethnic studies, where there are no standards and you can pass any nonsense in for a grade so long as you sound authoritative. She rationalizes her choices by saying that she wants to “help the children” or she’s “interested in learning,” despite the fact that all American education does is teach people to memorize Marxist nonsense and repeat it back word for word.
Claiming that girls are intelligent because they earn the majority of degrees is like saying that parrots are intelligent because the majority of them can mimic human speech.
When she graduates, assuming she isn’t spat right back into the service industry, she’ll go to work as a government bureaucrat, HR commissar, paralegal or other profession that contributes nothing to society. She’ll complain about the pay gap even as she takes every day off she can because her “head hurts” or she “needs some time off with the girls.” She’ll whine about the lack of girls in management roles even as she plans to quit her job when she has kids but not until she’s in her thirties, of course.
After all, she wants to “have fun” first and “get it out of [her] system” before she settles down.
But it’s in her choice of hobbies that the modern “smart” girl truly exposes her vacuity. She doesn’t spend her free time reading science textbooks or perfecting her chess game: she TiVoes Teen Mom and obsesses over Lena Dunham’s cleavage. If she reads books at all, she limits herself to trashy mainstream thrillers like The Hunger Games or textual pornography like Twilight. Her weekends are spent pumping chumps for peach daiquiris at the dive bar and getting pumped by every stud who stirs her loins. Even so-called “nerd girls” are phonies, as their “nerdiness” extends to playing video games once in a blue moon or re-Tweeting charlatans like Neil deGrasse Tyson.
The only thing separating her from a ghetto baby momma is the ability to form complete sentences.
Face it: the vast majority of girls are as hollow as a drum. The three or four surplus IQ points that college-educated girls have are wasted on them, because all they’re used for is rationalizing a life of mindless consumption and sluttiness. If the modern West is a cesspool, girls are its most devoted coprophages, gulping down runny diarrhea by the bucketload with forced smiles on their faces.
3. Girls know that their “intelligence” is a lie.
As loudly as they brag about their “strength” and “independence,” girls know inside that their credentials are worthless in the eyes of men. Go back to that chubby acting major who started insulting me on Twitter. Me pointing out that her degree was worthless didn’t faze her, nor did my reminding her that she was wasting sixty grand a year for it. It was calling her fatinsulting her looksthat wounded her most deeply.
And she was so insecure that she resorted to begging for validation from me, a man she considered a “misogynist.”
The vagina is the perfect representation of the nature of females. An empty vessel, a hole, a void with no identity of its own. Without a man to fill her with his essence, she is as useless as a crabapple rotting on the sidewalk. Only by taking that essence deep inside her can she mature and become the woman she was meant to be. And filled with the wrong essence, she becomes an intellectual Typhoid Mary, mindlessly infecting others with her diseases of the mind.
That’s the problem with girls today: they’re so full of bullshit that their eyeballs are brown.
That bullshit is pumped into their skulls by men. Every advance in “women’s rights” occurs only because men allow it to occur. Women’s suffrage was only passed into law in the U.S. because leftist Protestants in the Republican Party wanted to ensure an electoral majority for Prohibition and other “social purity” policies. Sexual liberation only happened in the sixties because cowardly draft-dodging hippies, knowing they could not compete with real men for the affections of feminine women, encouraged girls to slut it up so they could get laid. The mass entry of girls into college and the workforce was instigated by corporate capitalists in order to drive down wages and smash workers’ rights.
If at any point, men had collectively told girls no, they would have quieted down and gone back to the kitchen like they were told.
So it is with the myth of female intelligence. Girls believe they are smart, worldly and cultured because men lie and white knight for them. The gelded father telling his little princess that she can be whatever she wants to be, the slack-wristed orbiter who writes sweet nothings on her Facebook posts, the hipster nancyboy who claims he wants an “equal”: they are the enemy. Without them, the Katerinas of America would gladly kneel to their Petruchios. Because these genetic discards cannot compete with legitimate men, they encourage degeneracy in the vain hope of getting their dicks wet.
Spraying the hollyhocks with lye is the only way they can propagate their diseased seed.
As men, it is our responsibility to bring girls back to their proper place. To lead them into their natural roles as wives and mothers. We men do not choose or reward girls for their clown college degrees, their meaningless cubicle jobs, or their supposed “intelligence.” We reward them for their willingness to please us and make us happy, and in doing so make themselves happy. No amount of phony education or career “success” will scratch that deep itch in a girl’s soul: the desire to serve a man.
Not a “guy,” not a “male”: a man.
Inside every Strong, Independent Woman is a suppliant girl yearning to break free. I say we give that girl a hand.
(nontrollingaccount): I hate being attracted to attractive women, it's a massive pain in the heart and penis. I would pay top dollar to turn off sexuality to the point that when I see a hot/sexy/attractive woman, it would be no different than looking at a twig or a tire on the side of a highway.
If there is a safe city with way more unattractive and ugly people, I'd move there in a heartbeat.
Can't even pursue higher education or even go to stores without seeing attractive women in yoga pants/tight jeans. For the time being, trying not to look is the only option which fails in times when I least expect to see a hot woman. I went to Target to buy a bed set and a coffee maker, and I usually go an hour before they close to avoid lines, shoppers, and hot women, and there were hot women there anyway, black, white, arab, latina shopping for their tall husbands/partners.
(Godoftruelove): It's possible, but at least from what I know, you would have had to had not seen porn since puberty hit. I was lucky that I avoided porn for various reasons, mostly love, and I developed without it.
Most guys, look at porn as soon as puberty strikes, and it hyper-inflates their attraction to women, thus you feel attraction to women you don't want to, pre-porn, guys could be with a hot woman and NOT fall in love with her at sight, or even feel anything like guys do now.
Whoever introduced porn brainwashed and cucked society and men. Thus the root of the suffering is this. If you started off with a porn free beggining, girls wouldn't be able to torture you like they do now.
It might just be that I'm demi-sexual, but the correlation with my porn-free/fap-free development, and my now ability to not be attracted to beautiful women, despite still having the occasional need/urge to see boobs/be snuggled every now and then is still present, but never directed at any women(a condition I need to meet in order to enjoy any sort of sexual activity is that I must love the girl, and impossible thing to do now since I expect the same level of love from the girl, and I was fully aware since even back then of a lot of girls only seeking pleasure solely, and not true love.)
(HPFNU_redcurve): Chemical castration. I think lots of Incels should look into it- it might be the only way. If you can't solve a problem, kill it!
It won't help with wanting love though, it'll only turn you asexual. The job's half-done, now all we need to figure out is how to become aromantic and we're in the clear.
The logo Hillary Clinton chose for her 2016 Presidential Campaign is wrong on several levels. Here is what the logo looks like and here is why I think it’s not ok.
This is the worst part about her logo. It looks like a plane crashing into the twin towers and she knows it. You see, Hillary thought about all this long before releasing the worst and most controversial logo in presidential history.
You may find yourself wondering, how could she make something reminds so many people of the tragic terrorist attack on 9/11?
Because Hillary Clinton is heartless and I don’t say that lightly. Her life reveals that to be true. She’s been married and stayed married to a man who has been consistently unfaithful to her. This would break any self respecting woman’s heart, but Hillary has turned that part of herself off.
She was just blessed with her first grandchild and yet she’s going to spend her time running for President. Another heartless move.
And now she has heartlessly decided to remind America of the tragic events that took place on 9/11 for her own political gain . Heartless.
To Hillary Clinton, I have to say 9/11 is off limits. She’s decided to incorporate a terrorist attack into her logo. That is unacceptable.
So before anyone even thinks about voting for her, let’s all remember the extent of her decision making skills. Anyone who would use 9/11 to advance their political career does not deserve to be anywhere near the white house.
It’s time for Hillary to retire from politics.
Ladies (and gentlemen) let’s see her logo for what it really is a desperate attempt to create political buzz for her campaign at the expense of the victims of 9/11.
Let us end the conversation about the bad logo and make sure she loses this desperate attempt to make America notice her.
[fundie is explaining homosexuality]
There likely are many, several, and different purposes.
One seems to me to be 'the call'....(from whom?) to be different from what is obvious
re sexuality, and to do this at a very young age.
For example, I seem to remember when children did not think about sexuality
but rather PLAYED, and played games, and played OUTSIDE.
It seems that TV, video games, being inside, not being active, not being outside
has led to a much SOFTER individual whose purpose is EASY LIVING.
By 'easy living', I mean doing WHATEVER to keep their life easy, becoming
deceptive if needs be, and refusing any laws restricting what they wish to do.
They become lawbreakers.
Obviously, there are many groups and not one explanation fits all.
The end result will be a divorce from who they are....a split, so then flipping from
one way to another will be easy for them....if the shoe fits.
Re: Sexual dimorphism
All I see is a chad and an incel.
Because incels have the bodies and skeletons of women instead of, as should be, men.
No one here complains about being too masculine. Guys here complain about being too short, having a babyface, having a high-pitched voice, not having enough muscles, having a tiny, recessed jaw, looking like a child/baby...
As a guy who likes tomboy girls i find this funny.
The tomboy girls you like are like the head on the left, not like the head on the right.
Do they have large, masculine jaws? No.
Do they have very thick necks? No.
An example of this is Ruby Rose: Picture, Another one
She has all these feminine traits:
Thick, full, plump lips (compared to men's)
High and prominent cheekbones
Rounded, smooth chin
Thin, smooth jaw
Short jaw (in height)
She looks really feminine, you would never think that's a man. However, the short hair, the tough girl attitude and the rocker clothes are masculine traits. Tomboy girls are feminine girls with slight masculine touches.
Inceldom is a big dimorphism problem more than anything I'd think.
It is true that you'll find nearly no incels with classically masculine, rugged features and sharp masculine appearances like a solid lower-third, wider face, higher and more projecting cheekbones and overall orbital structure (which is cheekbones, frontal bone and maxilla mostly) and just bigger bones overall.
Most incels do not have very masculine faces overall or sharpness/angularity. Studies show that masculine-associated appearances attract women so it is clear that it is robustness and shape more than nearly anything else that creates the problem of not just being unable to attract any women but in being literally closer to ugly as a male wholly.
Because women care about sexual dimorphism more than anything else. Inceldom isn’t about personality, intelligence, sense of humor, ect, it’s about the fact that women automatically value the sexual dimorphism of a male’s bones as his social status more than anything else.
No matter how obvious this continues to become, people will desire to deny this because of the women are wonderful effect; People today are conditioned to be unwilling to accept just how shallow women are.
Why does everyone here blame the women? It’s not their fault that they find you unattractive, it’s not their fault that they’re shallow.
It's not women's fault, they're just breeding machines, it's our fault as men for buying into dumb abstractions such as "equality" and "justice" and thus giving them rights.
With every second that ticks by -
I watch and wait and look to the sky -
I think it is just a very small percentage of us beleivers that senses this feeling of His coming soon. I know I can't even convince my family (all saved BTW, Praise God) that things are as close as I believe them to be.
My wife is worried about firewood for this winter and heating propane and I'm like "Yeah, whatever".
[his next post]
[...] We have two fireplaces in addition to a propane central heating system. We have in the past used 5 cords of firewood and 200 gallons of propane for winter heating. This year I'm just not too concerned with getting either. I pray I'm right.
Seeing a women poured into tight pants at the grocery store is just as tempting and dangerous as seeing pornography on the internet. Men are under attack. Many preachers recognize the dangers of pornography, but fail to see the danger of sensually unclothed women at the shopping mall or church. Sexual lust is caused by sight for men. Thus, it is extremely important for women to hide their breast cleavage, thighs and sexy shape. Many women laugh at what I say, who are the same women that fornicate, have abortions, divorce and then wonder why their life is so messed-up. It's not that hard to figure out! Even if women dress properly, men will always still struggle with lust. It's part of our human sin-nature. However, when women deliberately dress slutty, wear tight blouses, drawing attention to their body instead of their heart, it is wickedness in God's sight. The Lord will judge every woman in eternity according to how she dressed and behaved on earth. Do you really think God doesn't care about how you dress?
Indecency is in the shopping mall. Victoria's Secret is no longer a secret! Porn is on every magazine! Porn is in all the professional sporting events. The cheerleaders lift their legs, open their skirts, showing their crotches and thighs. God only knows all the women raped, little girls molested, the broken marriages and wives beaten, all because of sluts like Taylor Swift, Katy Perry, the Dallas Cowboy Cheerleaders, Madonna, Julia Roberts, Sandra Bullock, Marilyn Monroe and all the other whores and devils on two legs. Jesus said in Matthew 12:36 that men will be held accountable for even their idle words. How much more shall God hold women accountable for intentionally causing men to lust and commit sin!!!
Pornography is coming into our homes through television, advertisements, movies, music videos and magazines. It's also coming through the phones in the form of filthy communications, so people can fill their ears and hearts with unholy thoughts and filthy words. People dial 1-900 numbers to talk dirty with some 300 pound pervert on the other end of the line. Sexting has become popular amongst teens, sending filthy text messages to each other. And now “selfies,” teens taking cellphone photos of themselves naked and sending them to friends, has become very popular. What do you think God thinks about this? You know what God thinks! Porn is in the newspapers. It's in the commercials. It's in business windows. It's everywhere!!! You can't name one thing that pornography hasn't gotten a hold of these days. America is filled with every vile abomination!!! Judgment day is coming for America and the wicked world!!!
10 Feminist Fantasies That Could Become A Reality In The Near Future
Corey is an iconoclast and the author of Man’s Fight for Existence’. He believes that the key to life is for men to honour their primal nature.
Around 2013 when I first discovered the manosphere, I knew things were bad in our society in terms of sex relations along with the corroding effects of feminism. But at the time, I didn’t appreciate just know how bad. In just few years since then, I’ve seen enough madness to know which direction we’re headed and it doesn’t look good. We already live in a feminist society and the harpies are pushing to make things even harder for ordinary men who just want to get on with their lives. The following will demonstrate what will happen to our society if we were to give into all the demented demands of today’s feminists.
Although this article is meant to highlight the craziness of it all, note that many of these concepts are already starting to take shape in our societies to become a reality.
1. Expansion Of Hate-Crime Laws
“You can’t save Mary Jane anymore, Spiderman. It’s benevolent sexism’, and therefore, a misogynistic hate-crime.”
In England, trying to pick-up a woman or even just whistling at her is considered a “hate crime” if the woman gets upset by it. It is a real possibility that this law might spread to the rest of the West and expand to include other misogynist offenses including: looking at a woman (what feminists call “stare rape”), calling a trans-woman a he (there’s already a similar law in New York), arguing with women online, manspreading, mansplaining, helping a woman, and so on.
2. Consent Forms
Since women get to dictate the terms of all sexual interactions, consent forms will have to become a necessity in the future. And not just for sex, but in all forms of interaction like being able to approach a woman on the street. Maybe an app will be developed where a woman could consent to sex, conversation, or being looked at so that she could screen out all the low-life misogynists who want to compliment her for her looks.
3. Anonymous Rape Accusations + 100% Belief In Woman’s Testament
All men are rapists; we need to believe her because she’s a woman. It’s a perfect circular logic.
Feminists claim that the reason we live in a patriarchal rape culture is because our society discourages rape victims (always women) from coming forward and also because their words are not taken seriously. So, what they’re proposing is clear: rape accusations should be done anonymously and the “victims” should always be believed against evidences that are biased because patriarchy.
Men have already lost their jobs, kicked out of school, jailed, and even murdered for false rape accusations while their accusers faced no legal consequences (and got to keep their anonymity). So, we’re not really that far from reaching that level.
4. Feminist Re-Education Camps
This book is not a mandatory reading in kindergartens yet. What more proof do you need that we are all oppressed by the patriarchy?
With feminism taking over the educational institutions and already working to reprogram men to serve the system, it won’t be long before men who have been found guilty of misogynist hate crimes to end up in re-education camps. We already have sensitivity training in jobs while colleges are adding courses on toxic masculinity to re-define what it is to be a man on feminist terms. It probably won’t be long before “toxic masculinity” is added to DSM as a mental disorder (in place of homosexuality) and treated like a disease in mental health institutions.
5. Government-Sponsored Feminist Tribunals
Canada already has an actual social justice tribunal.
Since it’ll be difficult to charge men of bogus hate crimes against women with nothing more than a woman’s feelings as a proof, the government may introduce tribunals similar to the kangaroo courts in universities and HR departments at workplaces, all in the name of creating a harmonious society free of hate. Those who enter these tribunals will also be destroyed by the media and have no chance of being employed and be subject to permanent social ostracism even if they’re found not guilty.
6. Systemic Castration
As I’ve mentioned in my other article, docile and compliant dogs are the ideal that feminists aim for in their efforts to domesticate men. A significant number of boys are already on ADHD medication to have their behaviors controlled while male sex offenders are given chemical castration. If all men are violent hooligans and rapists as some feminists claim, then the next logical step is to let the government control men’s testosterone levels to an “acceptable” level. Note that we already have many parents who are letting their children take hormones to alter their “gender.” This practice will likely become more common in the future.
7. Non-contact Sex
“She did not consent; I must not touch.”
Feminists have been so effective in terrorizing the beta males that many of them are afraid to interact with women in any shape or form. Consider that we already live in a world where walking past some deranged woman will get you accused of sexual assault. In the future, all physical contact with women may become sternly discouraged or even forbidden that more men will retreat to porn and sexbots as alternatives. Haptic technology for sex is already being developed to pave the way for a culture of non-contact sex.
8. Bachelor Tax
Did you think you pesky “MRA’s” could escape the gynocentric order by refusing marriage and going your own way? With the drop in number of men who are manning up that coincides with the rising number of single mothers who need to leech the welfare state, it’s not too unreasonable to expect a push for bachelor tax that will penalize men who refuse to put a ring on an aging, post-slut sow.
Knowing that it will cause a major backlash, the bachelor tax will probably not come into being in an obvious way. Instead, it will be introduced under the guise of supporting the poor single mothers and helping to foster families. Heck, considering how men are the primary tax payers while women are the primary beneficiaries of the welfare state, you could say that we already have a gynocentric taxation system in all but name.
Women already practice Alpha fucks, Beta bucks’ strategy. So why shouldn’t an empowered woman be allowed to do it openly without shame?
With the institution of marriage already destroyed and with many men already accepting cuckoldery as the norm in the form of “open marriage,” women may as well be allowed to have multiple husbands. And why not? We already know that there are far too many men for the number of women in our society and that those lazy men should do more to support women. Is it that crazy to have one husband for sex and another three for money? I’m sure many desperate simps will have no issue sharing a wife with several other men as long as they get some cuddling action when she’s not too busy banging her more attractive husbands. The implementation of bachelor tax, mentioned above, will also make marriage more desirable.
10. Concentration Camps For Men
The final solution to the testosterone problem.
If the above measures to protect women and ensure equality are implemented, it’s likely that all the misogynists will grumble in anger and resist them. If that is the case, it might be best to take the advice of the feminist, Julie Bindel, and place all men in concentration camps. No man, no problem! If you’re wondering how feminists could even achieve this, know that there is already an army of goons called the police who will gladly do as they’re told to maintain the gynocentric order.
As I’ve said in an older article of mine, feminism is practically a terrorist movement that demands more and more political, social, and cultural oppression of men for the sake of radical women who play the eternal victim and cry for never-ending privileges. While you may think that the above nightmare scenarios are over-the-top and unlikely to happen, I bet those who lived just few generations ago couldn’t have imagined what we’re witnessing today either. Feminism, by colluding with the government, will continue to grow like a tumor and it will not stop until you make it stop.
Remember that if we don’t fight back, no one else will.
Why don't we see FTMs with AGP?
I don't see as many women fetishizing how much they want to have a big fat cock compared to males with AAP.
I'd say they don't exist, I think the ones trying to become yaoi characters just don't like the idea of dating a straight man because of how they treat women, so they escape through a fantasy where all gay men are cute harmless boys. Some of those get grindr then complain, in their own spaces, that gay men won't have sex with them. They tend to stay in their communities because they aren't predatory and living out a fetish like men.
The devils best trick was convincing people he didn’t exist.
Men and women are physically and biologically different, so there's no reason to expect that the underlying root causes for conditions like these or how the conditions operate are anything alike.
FTMs are also a lot less common than MTFs, I think the ratio is something like 1:3.
There do seem to be paraphilic reasons for transition, tho- in addition to fujoshis / fetishizing gay men, there are places like the subreddit FTMsPunished (don't go there), show paraphilic motivation.
Same reason you don't see female transvestites, pedophile rings, etc. - paraphilias are very rare in women, some hypothesize that they do not exist in women at all.
Judging by r/detrans they also detransition and experience more regret.
(For clarity, I’m female + lesbian) i think its due to porn, and i dont really like it, but i have had a gender shift fantasy for years. For a while the only way i could reliably get excited/get off was thinking of myself...not becoming male, but having the male experience i was watching (principally receiving oral)—but only ever with a ridiculously large dick. That in itself would turn me on.
this did make me wonder if i was trans, on top of some other things from growing up.
thankfully though i get that it’s...well, it’s just a fetish.
Edit: I’ll also add that yeah, this seems pretty rare. Ive asked about it and some amount of gay women also project themselves onto the male in straight porn, but i think it was/is deeper for me. Otherwise it very very rarely has come up even through looking. This is actually how i came to learn about AGP kind of organically, rather than through trans discourse. There were AGP forums so i started looking for AAP stuff. Not much out there, iirc.
“MtF people who transition because of intractable dysphoria but don't invade women's spaces or publicly engage in fetishistic behavior”
Where are they?
“Second, if we can't extend compassion to AGP males, then we drive them straight into the arms of the TRA”
When we aren't looking, they admit they're terrified of liberal women turning on them.
“(Yeah, I get that for any A*P person, transitioning is in some way publicly engaging in fetishistic behavior full-time, but let's acknowledge that there's a difference—in degree if not of kind—between the MtF person who dresses like a normal adult woman and doesn't bother anyone and the MtF person who dresses like a loli streetwalker and bothers incredibly uncomfortable shop attendants for help with bra fittings.)”
What about their wives?
"It's a matter of degrees" meh...
It's just a way to divide women in good & accepting vs bad. What if I don't want this normalized?
This attitude will drive more agps to transition, & not as a last resort. After all, they can rely on the good, welcoming women to tell the hysterical witches to calm down.
good luck expecting a man who has spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to transition to not become entitled. After all, if a dysphoric agp shows up in the women's bathroom, the good, accomodating women will tell the others it's better not to make a fuss. Remember, we went from "it's just a poor soul with gender dysphoria" to 9yo on puberty blockers in a nanosecond.
Considering how profitable transitioning is and how accomodating women are - and how diligent they are at disciplining unruly women - what is the incentive for the medical profs to research a treatment for AGP besides transition? There isn't.
“do you really expect AGP males to care about anything we say”
They don't care about anything we say already.
I respect your moderate, compassionate tone, and practical attitude. It's possible that there is a minority who don't get a kick out of insulting and overly-sexualised porn-fuelled misconceptions about women, but from what I've seen they are a minority. The majority of them are freakish and pornsick, and lack humanity because they cannot see how insulting and harmful everything about their movement is to women.
I am not going to respect ANY of them until they start treating women with respect and advocating for us. Which they have never done and never will do.
Masculinity/strength= COPE. Darwinism applied to modern dating scene= LOW IQ
I'm sick of people trying to apply Darwinism and strength/health superiority to the modern dating scene. Even worse are incels DEFENDING feminism and women's sexual liberation with the argument that they're doing correct genetic selection and bettering the future generations or things like that.
First off, even if we assume Chad is always better genetically (he isn't necessarily, I'll elaborate on that below), western foids aren't reproducing solely with them. The most common scenario nowadays is a foid riding the Chad/good-looking men cock carousel during teens and twenties and then looking for a betabuxx (who'll statistically be an incel or normie at best, since Chad doesn't need to settle with used up old whores) while 30+.
She has a kid with that guy. A kid who was born from a 30yo+ mother and an incel/normie cuck who's most likely also far from his prime age as well.
The status quo tells women that having kids early is dumb and that they have to study and have a career first, and women follow the status quo blindly. They're very susceptible to it because women are natural conformists.
How is this bettering our genetics?
Also, the correlation between physical strength or even health and being successful with women is not that big. I have a Chadlite friend who has a poor health, he suffers from serious gastritits and other stuff like that. He still slays because of his awesome looking face while I'm a healthy incel at 29 after 500+ approaches.
Also, a facially good-looking small framed manlet mogs the shit all of me in the current sexual marketplace. If physical strength mattered, gymcelling and martial arts would be key factors to get women. They aren't, at best they help a bit if you're normie tier and above, but no amount of physical strength will redeem a truecel with sub3 face.
Is this guy a Chad slayer? He's certainly top 1% in physical strength if you count in his height, frame and martial arts ability. He would beat THE SHIT OUT of Chico or O'Pry.
Guys like this get way more pussy (and more quality pussy also) than him.
This guy would mog me even if he had lots of chronic diseases. FACE is the most important factor and FACE isn't necessarily correlated with being strong or healthy.
Masculinity and strength are COPE. Most women are even bisexuals, they'd pick a pretty girl over an ogre any day. I have above average testosterone, I'm tall and good framed and yet no woman ever want me because I have an ugly FACE.
Women are NOT supposed to be the selectors. In ancient times RAPE was the law. When Gengis Khan invaded an enemy tribe and killed all men there with his army, he surely didn't think "man, look at my canthal tilt and cheekbones, I'm also an Asian manlet, it's so over!" He just RAPED every foid and now like 20% of the whole Asia descends from him.
Women only have any power or choice today because CUCKS, which are all MALE, grant it to them. We're living an artificial, bizarre state of things, not a natural Darwinian one.
Evil is running rampant in America. While the church is content playing small ball (praying simply for individual needs) and sacrificing to get a runner in scoring position (elections), our opponents are swinging for the fences. We “pray” to end abortion (bunt) while our opponents swing for the fences (partial birth abortion). We fight for traditional marriage (bunt) while our opponents go for sexless bathrooms. (home run swing).
Jesus told us “All power is given unto me both in Heaven and on earth.” We have the Greatest Coach in the Universe with the greatest team ever assembled. But we want to play small ball. We want to compromise (bunt) our way to victory. We won’t bring out the heavy hitters. We don’t swing for the fences. In fact, we don’t even want to bat we want Jesus to miraculously hit the ball out of the park without us ever picking up a bat.
What if our team followed our Coach’s orders? What if we re-criminalized abortion and sodomy? What if we kicked the Devil out of our public schools? What if flexed our muscles and started swinging for the fences? What if God’s people demanded HIS return to HIS rightful position as the head of this government? What if God’s team played with as much commitment as the Devil’s team?
God’s kids are settling for the crumbs off of the Devil’s table. What if we played like the game was tied, the bases were loaded, and our clean-up hitter was walking to the plate?
Small ball isn’t working. We need Mickey Mantle. Instead we get Mickey Mouse.
Fuck. I want to die. I hate living in this damn world and my life especially. I hate being alive.
Today I kept having obsessive thoughts remembering this girl I used to have a huge crush on in my first year of university. Huge crush. Id gotten to know her over the period of that year too and I thought she might have liked me. Fuck. If only I knew then what I know now. I asked her out, we went for coffee often so I said if she wanted to go to the movies and get dinner as a date, she told me that she wasnt really interested in any guys at the time. Not long after that day, she then started to tell me that she found my friend really attractive and told me that she had sex with him the day she met him at this club meeting.
My friend wasn't one of those models that we post here on this sub but a generally good looking brown haired kinda tall white guy. This girl was a mixed race girl - half Lebanese and half English and she looked brown. I keep thinking of this I still talk to her very occasionally and i saw her Facebook pics she uploaded today and she's dating another white guy that looked like that friend of mine.
I wish I was never born. I fucking absolutely hate being a brown guy that's average looking and 5'10. I have nothing special about me. Im 23 years old now, this all happened when I was 18. That guy and the girl probably lost their virginities when we are in 10th grade or something. I still haven't held a girl's hand before. There is not a single woman in England right now that fantasizes about brown guys, every woman on earth likes white guys. Every woman. Tall good looking dark haired white guys. Every single girl I got to know didnt like me back. No woman has ever sexually desired me.
I cant stop thinking about this. For fuck's sake. I hate not being a good looking white guy.
Since I started puberty, I should've just avoided looking at girls and just never thinking a girl would like me. I wish I could go back in time and tried to never develop crushes on girls. I cant believe I was stupid enough to ask out so many girls that said they liked my personality. In high school, university, and most of life, looks are everything, everything. Personality is bullshit. Women lie so fucking much.
[SuicideFuel] I can't jerk off to porn with small dicks
I have a tiny dick, both in length and girth, but I can't get horny, or jerk off to porn with small dicks. Even when I imagine sexual scenes it's always with a chick blowing or fucking big or at least average dick. I know it's stupid and I tried because I have tiny dick too, but it's just not the same, I dont feel like a guy is really fucking a girl with his small weiner. My erection immediately drops no matter how attractive girl is or how good scene is. This makes me really depressed because that means if I ever got to fuck a hooker or she blows me, I will not feel horny because of my small dick, it's just not the same, she can't deepthroat me or I can't fuck her really hard and it's visually unattractive.
I seriously want to kill myself, I know I'm incel and ugly but If I had average dick at least I would be able to fuck a hooker. I just don't understand why I'm so unlucky in all aspects of my life. I even think Elliot Rodger had the same problem, he had a 4 inch dick and that stopped him from even trying.
[Blackpill] My teacher named her twin sons after two Tyrones she fucked in college
One of my teachers always likes to bring up her twin sons. The first time she said their names, I was shocked because their names sound black, and I didn't expect her to have biracial kids for some reason. But then I found out they're not biracial when a low inhib black girl in my class asked "uhhh are your sons black or something?" and my teacher said no. I wondered for months "why on earth would a white woman give her white kids those names?!?!". Well I think I finally found the answer. I was bored last night and decided to look her up on facebook. I found her profile and looked through it. I noticed that two black guys with the same names as her sons have liked and commented on lots of her posts. I went to their profiles and saw that they have the same college she went to listed on their pages so I assume they went to college together about 15 years ago. But the most important detail in all of this is the fact that they are TYRONES!! She also likes and comments on lots of their posts, and often uses flirty emojis like the wink face or tongue sticking out face. I am entirely convinced that she fucked them many years ago and still can't stop thinking about it and felt the need to name her kids after them just to immortalize her experience.
“Her” husband is probably in a casket right now jfl
Her husband doesn't seem to have facebook. If only he knew what she was up to...
Signs of an ugly male tbh
He probably is. My teacher is only 38 but she hit the wall HARDDD. She looks more like 48. She has really bad wrinkles and age spots all over her chest. Her sons are young (under 5). So she probably got married after she hit the wall. Her husband is probably an ugly beta buxx.
Where On Earth Are NASA's Rovers Sending Pictures From? Devon Island, Canada
There is an increasing number of people who believe that NASA's rovers never left the Earth in the first place, and the pictures they are allegedly sending back from Mars are taken in remote areas of our planet.
But if NASA's rovers are not on Mars, then where exactly are they?
First of all, evidence suggests that the pictures that we see on NASA's website are not even taken by the Curiosity and Opportunity rovers.
It is very possible that by now, both rovers are stored in a hangar, somewhere at NASA's JPL headquarters, and have been replaced by their smaller and more practical baby brothers.
Sure, if needed, they can always be taken out for a spin, but other than that, the smaller rovers are more convenient to work with.
One of the known locations where NASA is playing around with these small rovers is Devon Island, Canada.
(It's worth noting that Devon Island is "the largest uninhabited island on Earth," which seems like a pretty good location for a fake Martian photo shoot).
Just take a look at these pictures:
NASA base in Devon Island, Canada even without the color filters,
it's strikingly similar to Mars, isn't it?
NASA's "baby rovers" taking pictures in Devon Island, Canada
Sure, one could think NASA just needed a place where they can simulate the conditions on Mars, but what's the point of simulating those conditions with miniature rovers, that look and work almost nothing like their bigger brothers?
Their shape, size and weight are different and the wheels are worlds apart. It's really impossible to make even remotely accurate tests.
They also don't have the on board laboratories, so what's there to simulate? Except for taking pictures, the "baby rovers" look useless.
Check out the following video for further evidence (please notice the identical terrain as that from NASA's pictures):
The cameras mounted on the "baby rovers" have color filters already applied, but the final images those that we get to download from NASA's website are color-corrected even further, until they get that fake, reddish color that is so familiar to us (NASA actually admits the color tempering of their pictures, as you will see later on).
We have been tricked into believing the myth that Mars is the "red planet" (even though all amateur telescope pictures show otherwise), so NASA is now only perpetuating the lie.
The following is an amateur telescope picture of Mars taken on 2014, 03, 21 (source):
As you can clearly see for yourself, Mars is not red. It's light and dark brown, similar to what Earth would look like without all the water and vegetation.
Now I'm not saying that we could breath on Mars like we do on Earth, but where are the blue skies in NASA's pictures? That reddish sorry excuse of an atmosphere is obviously fake.
NASA admitted on numerous occasions to alter the colors of their pictures before posting them online, so that they look more like what we would see, if we were on Mars.
Here's something straight from NASA's website:
"Getting the colors right is not an exact science," says Bell. "Giving an approximate view of what we'd see if we were there involves an artistic, visionary element as well after all, no one's ever been there before." However, great pains are taken to be as accurate as possible, short of going there ourselves.
To give people a sense of being on Mars, scientists combine views through telescopes, data from past Mars missions, and new information from the current mission to create a color-balanced, uniform scene. Color-corrected mosaics simulate the view a person would see if all the images in the mosaic were taken on the same day, at the same moment.
In addition, the rovers can take three pictures in a row of the same surface area on Mars using three different primary color filters red, green, and blue to make one color image. "It works a little like an inkjet color printer, which combines primary colors to create various shades on paper," explains Eric De Jong, Lead for the Solar System Visualization Team at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory. "Then, we can tweak the color just like you can adjust the color balance on a TV screen at home." NASA, JPL
So, there you go. NASA is clearly admitting to "color correcting," "color balancing," and even "tweaking the colors" of their images, so you can see whatever they want you to see.
Does it make any sense to you? Why not simply taking pictures of the environment AS IT IS? Why changing its color into something else?
It's the same old "the government knows what's best for you" rhetoric, and the people have been tricked into blindly believing and obeying it without question.
I mean, you haven't heard anyone complaining about the "color tweaking," have you?
But the "color tweaking" is not all they are doing to the original pictures. NASA has been caught, more than once, faking entire environments of allegedly Mars.
NASA is a smokescreen for an advanced secret space program
As I have presented in a previous article that you can read here, NASA is just a smokescreen for the real space program, which falls in the military domain, especially the US Navy. These guys are flying extremely advanced "anti-gravitational" space crafts, capable of very fast interstellar travel.
Gary McKinnon is a hacker that managed to break into the computers of the Army, Air Force, Navy and NASA. Among other interesting things, he found out that the US Navy has a fully operational fleet of spaceships.
In his own words, here is what he found out:
"I scanned and looked for documents, I found an Excel spreadsheet which said, Non-terrestrial officers’. It had ranks and names. It had tabs for material transfer’ between ships. I took that to be, they must have a ships based in space the names started with U.S.S."
McKinnon is now facing a ten-year legal battle that could end up with life in prison. You can watch his interview here.
And the evidence to support McKinnon's claims is truly overwhelming. For example, Ben Rich, CEO of Lockheed Skunk Works, has famously stated in 1993:
"We now have the technology to take ET home." (Read more)
Ben Rich also admitted that the extraterrestrial flying saucers are real, and our space program is built with alien technology:
"There are two types of UFOs the ones we build and the ones 'they' build. We learned from both crash retrievals and actual 'hand-me-downs.'"
His colleague, Don Phillips, Lockheed design engineer, CIA and USAF backed his claims. (Read more)
Another Senior Scientist for Lockheed Martin and Area 51 scientist, Boyd Bushman, has openly talked about aliens stationed in Area 51 and "anti-gravity" technology, just before passing away in 2014. You can watch his testimony here.
'Captain Kaye' claimed to have spent 17 years on Mars and three years aboard an enormous space carrier.
Andrew Basiago also claimed to have been on Mars 40 times, and corroborates Captain Kaye's claims that there is an established human colony there.
Whistleblower Corey Goode claims to have been recruited through one of the MILAB programs at the age of six and personally traveled on Mars, where the Interplanetary Corporate Conglomerate (ICC)...
"...has an entire industrial infrastructure that includes bases, stations, outposts, mining operations and facilities on Mars, various moons and spread throughout the main Asteroid Belt (where a “Super Earth Planet” once existed). They have facilities to take raw materials and turn them into usable materials to produce both complex metals and composite materials that our material sciences have not dreamt of yet." (Source)
Laura Magdalene Eisenhower, the great-granddaughter of former US President Dwight David Eisenhower, has gone on record and testified that she was targeted for recruitment for a secret space program that would have allowed her to go on Mars, where there's a secret colony of humans. (Source)
Now, corroborating all these accounts, it becomes obvious that 'they' really have an advanced secret space program going on for decades and NASA is just a smokescreen for the public. Do you really think that the previously mentioned ICC would allow NASA to roam around with their rovers, taking pictures?
As an alleged, anonymous, "anti-gravity" insider, known as CaptainS, stated in 2011:
"NASA is just a front for the public. (...) The real space program falls in the military's domain, mainly Air force and Navy. But the nice chemical rockets sure are fun to watch... Very few people from NASA are actually in the loop. They don't know anything."
So, basically, NASA's role is to keep us distracted with their fake pictures from Devon Island, while the big boys have already established human colonies on Mars and who knows on how many other planets.
(On a happier, sarcastic note, I guess NASA's Photoshop experts will have a bright career in tourism, when NASA will eventually be shut down).
Before concluding this article, I leave you to watch NASA's absolutely ridiculous press conference about the alleged touch down of the rovers on Martian soil.
It has bad acting, fake excitement, lots of sweat and numerous in-your-face statements about this being just a movie that you paid for ($2.5 billion, to be specific).
These guys have absolutely no idea what they are talking about, they are unable to answer any scientific questions whatsoever and the journalists definitely know volumes more about this phony mission, but hey, as the guy says, it only cost you $7/person, so you might just as well enjoy it:
Think peolple think' look at all the avenues and don't have such a simple mind. That little effort can save that persons soul (and yours), How about if Christ comes the second after the person next to you saw you on a bathing suit and lusted.
Brutally mogged by son. JFL at people thinking that incels can't have good looking children.
Chris Eubank Sr. was a statusmaxxed blackcel and his son Chris Eubank Jr. is a good looking Chad/Tyrone.
Chris Eubank Sr. in his prime:
His son is like 6 points above him:
Holy shit, the chad fucks/beta bux story IN REAL LIFE
Im not quite sure if my contacts with different Chad-guys is a curse or a blessing. I mean, on one hand, it makes me fucking miserable, but in another way, in just confirms all the theories we (and evolutionary psychologists) have.
This guy is an online-friend I used to play computer games with a couple years back. He is a very good looking dude, he still plays computer games, he competes in "counter strike" and is pretty good at it.
Anyway, we bullshitted in our group on facebook and he told us something he recently experienced, it went like this:
He starts talking to a girl online, pretty good looking but nothing astonishing, anyway, they hit it off and everything feels good, so they decide to meet up.
When he arrives at her place, she gives him a shot and a beer immidately, she is also drinking and seems to wanna get drunk pretty quickly.
In about 30 minutes, they are making out hardcore on the sofa, and he is sucking on her tittie. They had called a taxi, cause they were heading out to the club together, so they discontunue the making out and go with the taxi to the club. Being there, they dance and all that shit, then after like 1-2 hours she wanna go home to her place again, said and done.
They get there, she rips his clothes off in the hallway and starts blowing him, then he fucks her over the kitchen table and in her bed.
Next morning, they fuck again and again. Then he goes home.
A week or two goes by, then they talk some more and she asks if he wanna come over again. Said and done.
During all this time, he thinks she is single and is looking for a boyfriend, so despite her not being super hot, he is quite into it as he likes to spend time with her. He comes over, they fuck all weekend.
Then he starts noticing weird stuff, like her phone constantly getting notifications and its a guy writing to her which she quickly remove from the screen. At first, he says nothing about it, but eventually he brings it up and she gives some bullshit answer, she can sense he know she is lying, so eventually she speaks the truth:
The guy who writes to her so much, is her actual boyfriend. So he asks her, "why the fuck do u bring me over then if u have a boyfriend?" in which she replies: "but he is not a guy i can think myself .. long term with, i dont wanna reproduce with that guy", SHE DONT WANNA REPRODUCE WITH THAT GUY.
He looks him up, the boyfriend that is, and the boyfriend is several points below him in looks.
He said to us, that this girl was super sweet and all, her personality, he would never have guessed she is a fucking whore.
My friend gets kinda hurt and tells her he was hoping she was looking for a boyfriend and her intentions was to make him a boyfriend. After that, he goes home and SHE NEVER WRITES TO HIM AGAIN.
You hear that?
This is fucking spermwars book in action.
She HAD her provider, who gave emotional support, and on the side, she searched for "alpha/lover seed". Not only that, but when the "lover" told her that HE wanna fill the boyfriend cup and "be hers", she cut the contact with him.
Her plans was actually to keep her beta-ugly-boyfriend, and at the same time keep fucking my friend for his looks, telling nobody of the guys of what was actually going on.
Im so fucking disgusted by females, I hear shit like this every day now, FEMALES HAVE NO HEART AT ALL AND NO SOUL
Women will ALWAYS fuck a chad behind your back even if you manage to get a girlfriend.
This is so fucking disgusting, i hate this world.
I mean, its one thing to read about it, in theory, like reading the shit those evo psych nerds conclude. But when you actually hear about that shit happening in real life, not only once or twice, but all the fucking time .. Then it really hits you how disgusting and disloyal these women are.
HOW CAN YOU have a "partner", and then continously cheat on him and lie every day to him? I would never ever be able to do that, to TRICK my girlfriend Im on live with her, then fucking tons of other girls any time she went away.
Thats just disgusting and horrible behaviour.
But females seem to have no problem with it, its like they cannot even see their fucked up way of behaving.
This is what confuses me.
When he declared to her that HE was looking for a relationship, IE to "fill the boyfriend role", she did never talk to him again.
So its not like she wanted to replace her cuck-boyfriend, she wanted to still be with him, but to FUCK Chad behind his back.
I dont get that. Why dont she wanna REPLACE the boyfriend with the Chad? Is it cause she is already so emotionally invested in her beta bux?
They want the best of both worlds, different men filling different needs all at the same time. The ultimate narcissists.
It seems like when my friend the "alpha" or "chad", tried to replace the boyfriend-role, she didnt want nothing to do with it, cause that "role" was always filled by her boyfriend. She wanted 2 different men for 2 different purposes, and when the Chad, whos purpose was to FUCK and nothing else, tried to get into the other role, which was already occupied, she lost the interest.
That is very interesting.
Seems to be the case. She’s probably afraid of the repercussions if she just outright abandons him for chad.
I wonder if they instinctively know that Chad is a high-risk to enter a LTR/cuck relationship with? Cause they know Chad has zillions of women who want him, so he is not a safe card for emotional support.
So for boyfriend ,they take some dude who they know dont have so many options and who is not a high T speciemen, cause he is "safe", so they emotionally invest in him, and let him be there for their emotional bullshit, but they still CRAVE the Chad cock, so they cheat with Chad when they want sex.
The moment he signalled that he values her more than she valued him, the attraction dropped off. They want the unobtainable, not the defeated.
Hold on, could you talk a little more about this? you might be right on the money here
Btw, aren't you the guy with Chad landlord? Must be hell for you jfl
yes I am. Im getting more and more used to it, cause i get to hear about black pill things i never would if i wasnt. It kinda sucks some times, but i know i never gonna slay anyway so wahtever
It is the dual mating strategy, beta fulfils her emotional and monetary/resource needs, while chad fulfils her primal and genetic needs for a high tier male, had the chad continued to meet with her she most likely would have let him get her pregnant (Claiming she is on the pill when she is not or something similar) and duped the beta into thinking the child was his.
This is just brutal, THESE WHORES ARE SO FUCKING BRUTAL, CHAIN THEM
Imagine getting a son, and then after 15 years or so, you get informed he is NOT your son, he is the son of some fucking giga-Chad she cheated with LOL
jesus fucking christ, this is why you dont talk to females at all , all of them whores.
Yes. I mean, Its not just a "coincidence", it happends all the fucking time now, ALL THE TIME. I hear about this shit all the time, every other day for fuck sake. Partly from my Chad landlord, but also his chad-friends, and also this online friend of mine.
All the time, females are cucking their BFs.
And think about every case around the western world that never come to the surface, cause most males are blue pilled idiots and trust their women? My god.
[Regarding Madonna's Super Bowl half time show]
The entire thing was occult.
First of all, she was representing the Babylonian/Mesopotamian goddess Ishtar. If you think her stage name is just coincidence, think again. Mary/Madonna is just a front for millenia-old "divine feminine" worship. And the Roman-esqe looking soldiers? Revived Roman Empire, anyone? And all the other gods she had dominion over? Who has dominion over false gods aka demons? Who are we really representing?
When she fell below the stage into "oblivion" as the lines "I hear you call my name, and it feels like home" come on. Heaven should "feel like home" when we're talking about prayer, and God. Because of the overtly suggestive undertones of the song, it can only mean one other thing: She's talking about HER god, Lucifer.
World Peace? Power of suggestion? Yep. All there. Even the push for the OWG. Yippee! (*Heavy Sarcasm*)
There is just so much more, but this symbolism is becoming much more obvious as time passes.
We decided before the game began we were going to watch an episode of Myth Busters to pass the time. Thank the Lord we did.
Lord, can you pretty please come get us now?
(As a brief aside... if you look at all the new movies coming out, what are they focusing on? Super heroes= the call for someone to save the people; and the apocalyptic type movies? It's just obvious.)
OH!!! One more thing and then I'm done, I promise. Did anyone else see the post-apocalyptic Chevy commercial? All the cities were destroyed, meteors were falling to earth, volcanoes were going off; and after a few survivors joined up and shared twinkies, frogs- FROGS were falling from the sky.
People who laughed really have no idea what they're in for...
Here’s a clearer picture. In the late 1800’s astronomers were looking for Planet “x”, They found a small planet out there and at the same time noticed it had a perturbed orbit. It was not planet “x” so the search continued. In the early 1900’s someone thought they found planet “x” but instead they discovered a new small planet but it also had a perturbed orbit so it was not planet “x”. The search was still on. In 1996 NASA launched the first infra-red telescope to look for planet “x”. It was looking then something happened. NASA told the world that this infra-red telescope had suffered a major cooling problem and was shut down. This was not the truth. The truth was that the infra-red telescope had seen something that scared the crap out of NASA, CIA and most officials in military and politics. Was it planet “x”? I do know that prior to 1996 our government was putting a lot of money into the NWO project but after 1996 monies were diverted from NWO project to the COG (continuity of government)project. Monies, I mean billions and trillions of dollars to increase the production of underground tunnels and bases (cities) and to build more nuclear TBM’s. I believe the government did see something that when it comes in could cause massive death tolls on the earth and as said before, the governments of the world know that in such a catastrophe the governments must continue. They are getting ready to go underground and hide (hide me where there is neither tree nor root) and wait til it’s clear to come out and millions will be gone and that will be another bird with one stone. Population pruning just like the contrails with metals that cause autism and cancer among several other things that will kill us over time. Our government WILL sacrafice a few for many, thats how they think and we are not names to them, we are numbers and alway’s have been. Think of yourself and families and don’t rely on anyone to come and save or help you. We the people are on our own so stop trusting the government as if they cared. The best way you could help yourself is to give your self to our lord jesus christ, our savior. I’m not preaching, just believe he’s the only one that can save you from evil. Aggressor’s may take my body but my soul will alway’s belong to God. give me freedom or give me death. I refuse to be led around on a leash by those who think they are god and as God is my witness, I will excersize my God given universal right to protect myself from unlawful aggression. It is a universal right and we must not settle for passivity. Just as every living creature that our God has created has the tools and abilities to protect itself from aggression, we also were given that right to protect ourselves from aggression. God Bless you all, be safe and well.
I never said bikini's signified consent. However, if you're 14 years old with breasts just popping out of your chest and you're running around in hooker boots and booty shorts where half your ass hangs out (No, not just short shorts, I mean booty shorts where half your ass really IS hanging out) and a bikini top or some other fragile excuse for clothing, and you get spoken to with disrespect, and you get treated with disrespect, then my point is that they can't really place the entire blame on the other party. The disrespect began with themselves.
Again sorry, this does not signify disrepect on the part of the girls or the apropriatness of a fifty year old man to offer his services.
I suppose it depends on the individual, really. There's the girls who are simply too young & ignorant, and rather unfortunately have parents who simply don't care... they usually grow into young adults who also don't care, it has a rather snowball effect. There's also the 'rebels' ...the girls who do come from perfectly good homes, who rebel against their parents morals and do so by being as scantily clad as they can without getting arrested for public indecency. Women and girls who dress "nicely" are fine. Women and girls who dress "slutty" and "Skanky" are not so fine. I do not look at them & think "Wow, they look fine!" although you as a male perhaps are doing so without even realizing how shockingly low these girls self-esteem truly is. Healthy sexuality does not mean that they have to sleep with everybody who pays them a compliment, nor does "slut" equal healthy sexuality. A girl who wears a "slut" t-shirt and takes a 50 year old guy up on his offers, isn't healthy. I rather prefer the girls who can actually realize the inappropriateness of the fifty year old man offering his services that you mentioned, than the ones who don't. Both types of girls exist but when they dress the same way, how is the 50 year old guy supposed to be able to tell them apart? Get it yet? Its a learning curve. 50 year old guy has probably learned that he has better luck with skanks than classy women, so those are the ones he offers his services to.
[ I thought you were somewhere in your 20s. It's fairly typical of the younger generations (and I include myself there, as most "feminists" are older than I am) to feel the job's been done, without realizing what all they did for us. And no, there's still more to be done. Wages might not matter to you, and it's great that you're in a position where your work is values, but that's not the case for everyone.
I just reread your last line... sexual harassment isn't about women inviting comments. I thought we were long past the time when we blamed the victim. ]
Lily in feeling as if the job is done, I'm not simply disregarding what has been accomplished. I'm not unaware of what all they did for us at all, I'm very aware of it. Yes there is probably stuff that can still be done, but I disagree that it needs to be dealt with in an extremist manner, by extremists. If on individual levels women are unhappy with their work, we have the voice & we have the power now to do something about it. Sitting & bitching isn't doing anything. Change jobs, or report the issue to the higher powers, and if necessary, report the issue to people outside of the company. Crying "woe is me" and doing nothing, doesn't fix the problem either.
Sexual harassment in SOME cases isn't about women inviting comments. In many cases, I agree 100%. I do however, think that there are also SOME women out there, who DO invite comments. You can't dress like a hooker, and expect to be treated like a lady.
[ Wow, you could be an Australian Cleric. Some girls who dress slutty are experimenting, some don't want to be talked to by like a lady, and some might wear the t-shirt "Just because I'm a slut doesn't mean I'll sleep with you" ouch.
If only the gay boys took to such reasoning. He was wearing a tank top, I could just tell he wanted it. Nope, not going to fly. Want to have sex? get consent. A bikini does not signify consent. ]
Your reasoning might work except your examples are lacking.
If girls who are wearing t-shirts and self-proclaiming themselves sluts, they have little respect for themselves and can hardly cry unfair when they get treated like a slut.
I never said bikini's signified consent. However, if you're 14 years old with breasts just popping out of your chest and you're running around in hooker boots and booty shorts where half your ass hangs out (No, not just short shorts, I mean booty shorts where half your ass really IS hanging out) and a bikini top or some other fragile excuse for clothing, and you get spoken to with disrespect, and you get treated with disrespect, then my point is that they can't really place the entire blame on the other party. The disrespect began with themselves.
[ Again sorry, this does not signify disrepect on the part of the girls or the apropriatness of a fifty year old man to offer his services ]
I suppose it depends on the individual, really. There's the girls who are simply too young & ignorant, and rather unfortunately have parents who simply don't care... they usually grow into young adults who also don't care, it has a rather snowball effect. There's also the 'rebels' ...the girls who do come from perfectly good homes, who rebel against their parents morals and do so by being as scantily clad as they can without getting arrested for public indecency. Women and girls who dress "nicely" are fine. Women and girls who dress "slutty" and "Skanky" are not so fine. I do not look at them & think "Wow, they look fine!" although you as a male perhaps are doing so without even realizing how shockingly low these girls self-esteem truly is. Healthy sexuality does not mean that they have to sleep with everybody who pays them a compliment, nor does "slut" equal healthy sexuality. A girl who wears a "slut" t-shirt and takes a 50 year old guy up on his offers, isn't healthy. I rather prefer the girls who can actually realize the inappropriateness of the fifty year old man offering his services that you mentioned, than the ones who don't. Both types of girls exist but when they dress the same way, how is the 50 year old guy supposed to be able to tell them apart? Get it yet? Its a learning curve. 50 year old guy has probably learned that he has better luck with skanks than classy women, so those are the ones he offers his services to.
Yes, some girls are just experimenting and some quickly learn that isn't the way they want to be seen. I see 12/13/14 year olds walking around here, wearing stiletto boots, miniskirts (and I mean *MINI*) and crop tops with their bellies hanging out & these miniskirts aren't even like the 80's miniskirts, these are mini on the leg & mini on the hips. I quite literally have underwear which covers more than these skirts do.
Am I saying "all the blame rests with the victims" no, not by a long shot. However, like I said before, common sense should prevail. If a woman makes herself an easy target for lewd remarks and sexual harassment, common sense should speak to reason, and she should realize that if she dressed less slutty, she'd get treated with more respect. We don't live in the age of ignorance. If a woman is working late & its dark outside & her car is parked on the far side of a dimly lit underground parking lot, is she to blame if she gets attacked? No, but YES there are preventative methods available in most of these instances, to keep stuff like this from happening. Ie, have a security guard escort you to your car.
Basically you reap what you sow.
If you disrespect yourself, and show it through your own method of dress, you cannot expect respect from others.
If you ignore common sense for dangerous situations, then yes you ARE partially at fault for the fact that it even happened and YES there WERE ways that you could've prevented it from happening, in many instances.
Women want "equal status" except they want to hang onto their "vulnerable" female helpless status at the same time? I don't think so. Physically we are no match for most men, that is fact. Mentally we could be equal if we'd stop placing ALL the blame elsewhere & started using our brains and common sense.
[ Well, I couldn't dissagree with you more. I have a great deal of respect for women with healthy sexualities and the strength to be themselves... that is respect. That doesn't mean that they want to be abused or that every lad is in their market. Raping a slut doesn't mean that you're man enough to deserve her. ]
I too have a great deal of respect for women who have healthy sexualities and the strength to be themselves. There IS a difference, however, between a woman with a healthy sexuality, and a woman who is insecure & needy for attention, and dresses herself in a manner that ensures she gets the attention whether its positive or negative. I don't know what kind of world you might live in, but where I live "slut" is not a complimentary term.
In early December, my family and I went to buy our Christmas tree, but instead of buying it in our typical SWPL neighborhood, we ventured outside of the city to make a day of it on a family farm in a working-class suburb. We had an idyllic vision of escaping the problems of city life. We imagined drinking hot chocolate and laughing with similar-looking families, our children playing with their similar-looking children.
There was some of that, but the scene was far from wholesome. A surprisingly significant number of children at the farm had frizzy blonde-tinged afros, the tell-tale sign of black-white miscegenation (I say “sign” because many of these frizzy-haired kids had only one parent with themalmost always a heavily tattooed and obese white mother with creative piercings and hair coloring). Almost all of the adults were white, but many of them mumbled in a barely comprehensible black-imbued vernacular and dressed in sloppy hip-hop attire. This was not the scene we had expected.
That night, we came back to the city and ate dinner at an upscale restaurant. Every single patron was whitemostly young hipsters. The decor was agrarian and the background music, to my surprise, was country (mostly Chris Stapleton). This was the idyllic traditional America that we had hoped to find earlier in the day.
Over dinner, my wife and I discussed what we had seen. Based on the voting patterns in both areas, we could safely bet that the vast majority of the people at the farm voted for Donald Trump. And we were almost certainly the only Trump voters at the upscale city restaurant.
The irony is that much of the diversity at the farm is a direct result of the last 50 years of housing and education policiesthe very programs white liberals favor in their politics but flee in their personal lives. This feature of white liberalism has been noted before, perhaps most cleverly by Joe Sobran: “In their mating and migratory habits, liberals are indistinguishable from members of the Ku Klux Klan.”
But white elites do not just flee the consequences of their diversity politics; once freed from the burden of diversity, they create replicas of the aesthetic and culture that their liberalism is destroying. Indeed, at the upscale urban restaurant there were no signs of diversity degeneracyno hip-hop attire; no frizzy-haired children; no black-imbued vernacular. In fact, it was just the oppositelumberjack shirts, two-parent families, cohesive and pleasant interactiona simulacrum of the traditional America these very elites are destroying through their politics.
Our liberal rulers pollute public white culture but then produce an artificial version of it in their private lives to satisfy their longing for community and identity. This would not be such a problem if their poorer white brethren could also maintain this public-private dichotomy. But because the working and middle classes lack the money and mobility to escape the diversity degeneracy that seeps deeper and deeper into white America, they are stuck with the cultural pollution that the elites create.
This recalls another Sobran gem: “The purpose of a college education is to give you the correct attitude towards minorities, and the means to live as far away from them as possible.” But the prescient Sobran did not go far enough. Our elites seek not only the means to live far away from diversity, but the power to impose diversity on othersall in the name of cultural enrichment.
This underscores two features of our predicament that I have been thinking about ever since our day at the farm: (1) how diversity has polluted white suburbia, and (2) how diversity is a new form of cultural warfare.
You can find this pattern throughout the United States. Pick a city and compare its wealthy to its middle-income suburbs. You will find that in many cases the wealthy suburbs are quite liberal but have very few blacks, and the nearby middle-income suburbs are much more conservative and have far more diversity.
This is a pattern that extends beyond geography. Compare the magazines at the check-out at an upper-class grocery store, such as Whole Foods, to those at a more middle-income establishment. You will find that the magazines at the upper-class store are tasteful, restrained, and culturally whitewhereas the magazines at the middle-class store bombard the shopper with diversity propaganda. The check-out counter has become a diversity warzone.
Of course, part of this discrepancy is due to the market. Poorer whites do not have the money and mobility to opt out of diversity, and perhaps these less-educated whites have tastes that make them more susceptible to the vulgarity of black culture. But the market is only part of the explanation. A more significant force is that our legal, political, and entertainment institutions are imposing this culture on them.
And again, the free market is only part of this story. This transformation of middle-income communities did not happen until American law hit them with the one-two punch of mandating integration and eliminating the freedom of association.
Thus, it is not simply that diversity means conflict, but that all the rhetoric and sloganeering about our national diversity obsession has become a form of cultural and demographic warfare. Our elites destroy the middle-classes through political slogans promoting our “greatest strength,” and coercive programs that cite the nation’s “great moral victory” over “racism.” When you hear elites extol the virtues of diversity, you are being attacked.
So does our hope lie with the proles? The big difference between Orwell’s 1984 and 2018 is that Orwell’s elites did not bother to indoctrinate the masses, on the ground that the proles’ fidelity to Big Brother was considered irrelevant. By contrast, in our diversity dystopia the masses are at the core of the Left’s indoctrination project. Our “proles” are the ones forced to suffer a bad education in integrated schools. They are the ones subjected to violence, harassment, and intimidation. And they are the ones told, again and again, that any resistance to this makes them betrayers of who we are as Americans, deplorable traitors in need of ever-more reformation.
Leadership may not come from the proles, but good sense and votes will. Those who bear the burdens of diversity see its damage most clearly. It is no accident that Donald Trump swept the white working-class vote.
Whatever our own particular economic station, we all have a role to play in restoring working- and middle-class white America. We should be hiring our own people, tutoring our own people, supporting scholarships for our own people, and doing our best to build schools and cultural institutions that can be healthy environments for our own people.
Dr. Murray may have been right that white America’s “coming apart” defined the last part of the 20th century due to white flight from the cities. But “coming together” may define the first half of the 21st centurybecause now there is nowhere to run.