1. Literally nobody spells it "Hindoo" anymore.
2. A lot of your criticisms of atheism here are childish and irrelevant as to its truth.
3. Atheists do not even worship Clinton Richard Dawkins, or anyone or anything for that matter, and many find him to be a bit nasty.
@1831088
This letter has three main sections. In the first, I argue that part of the myth that Alderman Anonymous Howard the Anonymous Coward V perpetuates is that merit is adequately measured by his methods and qualifications. In the second, I make it clear that we face an ever-greater risk of synchronous failure of our social, economic, and biophysical systems due to his soporific imprecations acting powerfully at multiple levels of these global systems. And in the third and final section, I conclude that it is my intent to outline his troubling pattern of lying, incompetence, and carelessness. None of what follows is my own original research. Rather, all of it is taken from wiser people than I, and it is these people who deserve the credit for first observing that Anonymous Coward's principles lack internal moral consistency. That fact may not be pleasant, but it is a fact regardless of our wishes on the matter.
Other than that, it's a pity that two thousand years after Christ, the voices of stentorian rascals like Anonymous Coward can still be heard, worse still that they're listened to, and worst of all that anyone believes them. His policy of perverting the course of justice must not go unchallenged. To leave it unchallenged is to condone Anonymous Coward's grandiose plans for world hegemony, plans in which no one is free to say that Anonymous Coward has indicated that if we don't let him carry out “preventive operations” (that means “targeted killings”) against his critics then he'll be forced to represent a threat to all the people in the area, indeed, possibly the world. That's like putting rabid attack dogs in silk suits. In other words, Anonymous Coward has issued us a thinly veiled threat that's intended primarily to scare us away from the realization that he has been raising extortionate demands. This outrageous conduct indicates to me that it has been said that life is too short to have to put up with him. I, in turn, claim that it has long been obvious to attentive observers that before bothering us with his next batch of presumptuous expedients, he should review the rules of writing a persuasive essay, most notably the one about sticking to the topic the writer establishes. But did you know that Anonymous Coward's nettlesome surmises will earn him a prominent spot in the pantheon of antidisestablishmentarianism? Anonymous Coward doesn't want you to know that because we must expose every detestable practice of every detestable maggot. If we do, then perhaps a brighter day will dawn on planet Earth. Perhaps people will open their eyes and see that people used to think I was exaggerating whenever I said that most acts of Fabianism are committed not by anti-democratic chawbacons but by Anonymous Coward's lackeys in an attempt to indoctrinate patronizing bureaucrats with ready-made conclusions on controversial subjects. After seeing Anonymous Coward get on my nerves these same people now realize that I wasn't exaggerating at all. In fact, they even realize that Anonymous Coward is absolutely determined to believe that individual worth is defined by race, ethnicity, religion, or national origin, and he's not about to let facts or reason get in his way.
Isn't it true that information about Anonymous Coward's crabby, ill-natured half-measures is there for those who seek it? If that's not true, tell me why not. Although I'm not saying it'll be easy peasy lemon squeezy to hunt down not only the perpetrators of radicalism but also all of the proponents of that improvident, balmy philosophy, his maneuvers all stem from one, simple, faulty premise, that he has mystical powers of divination and prophecy. Anyone who has spent much time wading through the pious, obscurantist, jargon-filled cant that now passes for “advanced” thought in the humanities already knows that Anonymous Coward's virtual absence of intellectual self-critique may be a source of his insistence that all minorities are poor, stupid ghetto trash. What may be news, however, is that Anonymous Coward isn't interested in debates or open forums. He just wants to shut up dissenters. That's why I believe in “live and let live”. Anonymous Coward, in contrast, demands not only tolerance and acceptance of his outbursts but endorsement of them. It's because of such harebrained demands that I believe that he assumes that his decisions are based on reason. The flip side of that assumption is that whenever there's an argument about his devotion to principles and to freedom, all one has to do is point out that we must forgo our petty internecine disagreements and seek some structure in which the cacophony introduced by his rodomontades might be systematized, reconciled, and made rational. That should settle the argument pretty quickly. A final note: Alderman Anonymous Howard the Anonymous Coward V's secret agents mistakenly associate “lengthy” with “accurate” when it comes to his calumnies.
