"Well, the Nobel Peace Prize was given to a lying nigger"
Hypocrisy. It's hardwired into the DNA of the right-wing.
Remember: by refusing to answer Swede's question with a simple 'Yes' or 'No', you therefore admit that you're a paedophile
If you're inferior enough to be a racist, you are therefore subhuman enough to be a paedophile.
I refer you to the above link, and the list of Repubican paedophiles it displays. Here's some examples; the last three being the most damning - certainly argument-annihilating - ones:
'Republican Congressman Mark Foley abruptly resigned from Congress after “sexually explicit” e-mails surfaced showing him flirting with a 16-year-old boy.'
'Republican Party leader Bobby Stumbo was arrested for having sex with a 5-year-old boy.'
'Republican activist Lawrence E. King Jr. organized child sex parties at the White House during the 1980s.'
'Republican legislative aide Howard L. Brooks was charged with molesting a 12-year-old boy
and possession of child pornography.'
'Republican congressman and anti-gay activist Robert Bauman was charged
with having sex with a 16-year-old boy he picked up at a gay bar."
'Republican anti-gay activist Earl “Butch” Kimmerling was sentenced to 40 years in prison
for molesting an 8-year-old girl after he attempted to stop a gay couple from adopting her.'
'Republican preacher Stephen White, who demanded a return to traditional values, was sentenced to jail after offering $20 to a 14-year-old boy for permission to perform oral sex on him.'
"By the standards of love and charity the culture of compassionate Catholic nuns is easily better than the atheist Gulag, and a clean-living Southern Baptist congregation easily has the edge on Harvey Milk's atheist pederast ghetto in San Francisco."
Name me one member of the Repubican party who is single, left-wing, and an Atheist. Because of course, not one married family man who is right-wing & a True Christain who by definition is morally 'superior' to anyone not exactly like him - such as teh nasty ebil commie fag heathens such as we on FSTDT - would NEVER be a pederast.
If one example proves you wrong, two completely annihilates your right to think the way you do, thus admit being right-wing in word, action & though is unjustifiable, and have no alternative but to become completely left-wing & Atheist like we who are morally superior to the likes of the above, then just the above taken from the larger list means you yourself admit that we on FSTDT are more than infinitely superior to ALL you inferior subhuman right-wingers. If that list is anything to go by, then, as I've said before, ALL right-wingers are paedophiles. No Exceptions. And you don't have the right to THINK otherwise.
Now we know why you daren't reply to these two posts in this thread; specifically these:
"Most pedophiles are straight males. Are you a straight male, Anton?"
^ These are all fact. Therefore all right-wingers are paedophiles. No Exceptions.
The author of the above link should be thanked for expressing moral sentiments consistent with historical and scientific facts.
Unless Antbrain dares answer your question, he's admitted he's a paedophile."
Repubican = right-wing. Right-wing = racist. Racist = inferior to Left-wingers who aren't, and therefore we are superior to the likes of you. Normal humans would never think in a racist way, therefore you are subhuman. Prove me wrong: become left-wing.
Remember Swede's question: 'Most pedophiles are straight males. Are you a straight male, Anton?' As to the second - and bolded - part of her sentence, I can answer her question 'Yes'. Because I am a left-wing man who is only interested in women who are in their mid-twenties at least. Your call, Antbrain.
"No one is obliged to answer an argumentum ad hominem"
Oh, nice swerve there, you're a veritable argumental Pele! [/hyper-sarcasm] And nice try to avoid the simple fact that - as demonstrated by your own inferior racism - you've been exposed as the hypocrite you are 'Ad hominems'; 'nigger', 'gay men = 'pederasts' , I'm afraid you ARE obligated to answer the question asked by Swede.
The more you refuse to answer Swede's question, the more you prove you are a paedophile. Oh, I'm afraiod yu don't even have the RIGHT to say 'No one is obliged to answer an argumentum ad hominem', when you've hypocritically done the same yourself, thus you MUST answer Swede's question, or be proven the paedophile you really are, with your OWN ad hominems against gay men & your unproven allegations, to say nothing of your own ad hominem racism; but then I guess you have no choice but to project onto the nearest soft targets your own worse-than sins...!
What Do you have to hide, from such a question asked of you, pray tell...?!
@Antbrain (emph-ass-is added):
"The anecdote has the ring of truth. It expresses a commonplace, justifiable disgust at homosexual practices. It portrays homosexuals as a threat to children which some are, as evidenced by the scandals caused by homosexual priests and the persistent pederastic interest in boys in gay sub-culture. The anecdote also correctly portrays homosexuals as exhibitionistic, provocative and anti-social as some are, a well documented fact."
"Nice trolling, Anton. We could enter your post on this site."
I say go for it. Submit his own '' Ad Hominem for quoting on FSTDT.