"The word sea (bahr) is used 32 times in the Quran. The word bahr is used both for the sea and other waters like lakes and rivers. The word land (berr, yabas) is used 13 times. If we calculate the ratio of 32 to 45 the result is 71.111%."
And?
I do believe you've forgotten to make a fucking point.
"You may look up in any encyclopedia in the world and see that the lands cover 29% of the earth whereas the seas cover 71% of it."
Unfortunately this is exactly where I thought you were going with that idiocy.
"It is really an interesting miracle that scientific and the Quranic ratios of the lands to the seas are exactly the same."
Yeah. Astounding. Now compare the ratio of "night" or "dark" with that of "day" or "light" and see if you get some number that you can twist around to show that it's somehow meaningful. Better yet, maybe you and that Bible Code twit can get together and create some sort of Grand Unified Theory of Stupid Shit that will prove both of your books are correct--even where they contradict one another and reality.
"This knowledge which was not available in Muhammad’s time is coded in the Quran with concordance of words."
First of all, as I often like to point out, correlation does not equal causation. Just because you found such a thing does not mean that it was put there purposefully by someone who had such knowledge.
Second, a single example of such a thing is not statistically significant. How about you give me a list of 100 such correlations between the ratio of two antonyms and actual scientific data? Then I might be a bit more inclined to not think you're a raving lunatic.
"People who will outgrow their stubbornness will see that this is an easy to understand and impossible to imitate miracle."
I'm pretty sure that's what they said about the Bible Code.
