This brings up a point I have thought about for a while, and might involve a break from androsphere orthodoxy.

We know that before Marriage 1.0 was created, almost all women reproduced but just 40% of men did. This meant that the bottom half of men were disenfranchised.

BUT, this meant that every new boy born was the son of an alpha and the grandson of an alpha.

Marriage 1.0 was meant to harness male output by enabling all men to be fathers (and ensure each woman had a protector). But this involved an unnatural number of lesser Beta or Omega males to reproduce.

Hence, today we have a lot a manginas. Manginas are the outcome of too many lesser Beta/Omega males being able to reproduce. A Futrelle is a very unnatural outcome.

Maybe the attempts by women to destroy Marriage 1.0 are what nature wants them to do, because nature is seeing too many manginas being created, and this is a process to correct that. What is wrong is that women have enacted laws to steal a man’s income stream on a ‘no fault’ basis, and to use children as conduits for wealth seizure.

But perhaps the wishes by women to shut out the bottom half of men from reproduction, is in fact what nature wants, to get evolutionary norms back on track.

Of course, this brings up the problem of civilization being the product of the work of beta males. But then again, are the bottom 20% of men doing any useful work? If Futrelle represents the culmination of mangina existence, I think we can agree he and his ilk were never going to be the ones who did any useful work in terms of keeping the lights on and the roads paved. In other words, are the bottom rung of men even the ones doing any of the useful work? I think many of them are not (again, look at the most committed manginas, and see if they have any ability to do the important, civilization-sustaining work).

Maybe women are acting a certain way, because nature wants them to, in order to undo the generations upon generations of selective breeding that enabled manginas to exist.

After all, one thing that feminists and androsphere men can agree on, is that manginas should not exist, and all costs should be transferred onto manginas, without mercy.

This idea is still evolving, but there may be merit to the idea that if Marriage 1.0 enabled generations upon generations of bottom-rung men to reproduce, where they never would have under prehistoric norms, the present-day population of mangina represents the cumulative refuse of that unnatural selection, and women are merely attempting to correct this, under nature’s directi0n. If this is the case, we should not oppose it. Rather, we should only be educating men and let THEM decide on whether they want to be red pill, or blue pill (and hence on the waitlist for the extinction that women are gradually processing them into).

This also means that Game is important, for single AND married guys. Your evolutionary future depends on it.