Depending on the girl she’ll hit her true bloom somewhere near nineteen years old and hold it for a maximum of five years. She can continue to be sexy into her late twenties but the unmistakeable radiance diminishes.
I believe how a woman conducts herself determines the length of her bloom.
Put simply, “good girls” who follow a healthy lifestyle and identify with the feminine last longer than “bad girls” who chart a path through hedonistic waters. The following bad habits ravage a girl’s radiance:
?Excessive drinking. Men are constituionally far more capable of holding their beer over time than women. It’s not merely because a man’s physique is less important in determining his overall value. Women who drink even 10 units a week are seriously messing up their hormones, their shape, and their skin.
?Excessive cock-hopping. Sex in itself adds to a woman’s glow but sex with different men detracts from it. A woman who gets herself fucked 500 times by one guy she loves will look good. If the same woman spreads those fucks across 30 guys she will look like shit.
?Excessive careerism. Women are not designed to carry the weight of the world on their shoulders. Look at photos of Clint Eastwood or Charles Bronson. When a man carries responsibility he takes on a weathered look that adds value. A weathered woman looks horrible
40 comments
"a man’s physique is less important in determining his overall value"
"Sex in itself adds to a woman’s glow but sex with different men detracts from it."
"When a man carries responsibility he takes on a weathered look that adds value. A weathered woman looks horrible "
Gender-centric versions of Jim Crow laws.
Women who drink even 10 units a week are seriously messing up their hormones, their shape, and their skin.
[citation needed]
?Excessive cock-hopping. Sex in itself adds to a woman’s glow but sex with different men detracts from it. A woman who gets herself fucked 500 times by one guy she loves will look good. If the same woman spreads those fucks across 30 guys she will look like shit.
But if a guy fucks 30 chicks, he's an alpha jock, while a guy who does it only with a single girl is a beta nerd. Gotta love those double standards.
?Excessive careerism. Women are not designed to carry the weight of the world on their shoulders. Look at photos of Clint Eastwood or Charles Bronson. When a man carries responsibility he takes on a weathered look that adds value. A weathered woman looks horrible
Instead, she should be in kitchen, carrying the weight of making you sammiches, right?
?Excessive drinking.
?Excessive cock-hopping.
?Excessive careerism.
All these are bad for everyone. Excessive drinking because it can lead to alcoholism, promiscuous sex (without protection) because of the chance of STD's, and being a workaholic can lead to stress.
A woman who gets herself fucked 500 times by one guy she loves will look good. If the same woman spreads those fucks across 30 guys she will look like shit.
Yeah, I think you're full of shit here. I don't think her body will know much difference between one penis 500 times and 500 different penises.
"Put simply, “good girls” who follow a healthy lifestyle and identify with the feminine last longer than “bad girls” who chart a path through hedonistic waters."
Two words - Joan Jett. This theory is invalid.
Men are constituionally far more capable of holding their beer over time
I hold my beer over time...in fact, I hold my beer over just about everything *burp*. (All things in moderation [yeah, riiight]) It's in the constitution.
So, a "good girl" stays sexy longer than a "bad girl"? I thought it was "bad" to be sexy...
* Men are allowed to show the effect of excessive drinking, women are not. Alcohol messes up a man's hormones, shape and skin too.
* How the heck does the "glow" know which men a woman had sex with; whether it's the same one or several? What if she "gets herself fucked" by 30 guys she loves?
* No, women are designed to carry the weight of the world on their hips, literally. I'd say Clint Eastwood looks more horrible than, say, Martha Stewart or Virginia Rometty.
What "overall value"? Krauser, would you rather "get yourself fucked" by a 55-year-old guy with a beer gut, or by a 30-year-old woman with less than perfect skin, lots of sexual experience and a well-paid job? How's their "overall value" now?
Oh please! You're a "pick up artist" the same way Mark Rothko is a talented artist. You have not had one single "PUA adventure" because you're a horrific little nerd with intimacy issues, & quite possibly an alcohol problem.
Charles Bronson is dead; Eastwood merely looks dead & may in fact be brain dead. Either way, he doesn't have a weathered, valuable look; he looks more like a mummified bog-man. Women do not like men who resemble beef jerky.
1- You don't know some of the women I do. There are those - especially down Hessle Road - who could drink you under the pub itself, never mind the table.
2- And a man who 'spreads it about' will look worse in time. Also, Condoms .
3- 'Careers', eh? You mention Acting. Okay:
image
Honor Blackman. "Goldfinger" (Pussy Galore). "The Avengers" (Cathy Gale). Your argument is invalid .
Sunscreen, condoms, vegetables, and only get pregnant once. I'll award half a point for the alcohol reference. Like smoking, drinking does take a toll on skin and other organs.
"Women who drink even 10 units a week are seriously messing up their hormones, their shape, and their skin"
What the fuck is a "unit?"
"Bloom"? Women--in fact, people--are perennials, and bloom again and again.
Followed the link and Good God that man is pathetic. He looks like Moby's asthmatic brother.
Isn't the point of pickup artistry to get men laid easily? If so, then the only women you're going to be able to pick up are the ones who have had sex with dozens of guys or will have had sex with dozens of guys, you know that right?
Sorry but Eastwood looked hotter as a youngster in the 1950's-60's. Now, he's grey & wrinkly in a bad way. Bronson always looked like a butt-ugly wrinkled frog. Yuck!
In a nutshell, a lady who has lots of sex has lots of life and you are a dumbass!
We ladies have the right to be as sexual as we want to be so, *PBBBBBBBHHHT*!
Oh, KIM CATRALL!
The only granule of truth in this is that women should, in general, drink less than men. And that's not for any supposed "moral" reasons but purely because women are, in general, smaller than men and hence, alcohol affects their liver slightly more easily.
The rest is complete arse-gravy.
: @ mrjuju:
A unit is a British measure of alcohol strength, used to determine safe drinking levels. It's based on one shot of whisky being roughly one unit (all alcohol is measured by a device called an "optic" here), roughly equivalent to half-a-pint of commercial lager, slightly under that for cider.
You know, I wouldn't want to sleep with a girl who had slept with five hundred guys either. I'd be left wondering if our particular relationship meant anything. The difference between me and this jackass? I found someone who matched my personal preference. This guy wants to force all women to match his preference. And that's inexcusable.
Citation needed on all fronts, especially since I have female friends that can drink me under the table who are positively radiant. Maybe my opinion of beauty is different than yours, though- I don't see the world in Douche-o-vision.
Well, that's some pure, unadulterated sexism right there. Like if there was a definition of "sexist, misogynist, douche-baggery" in the dictionary, this would be the example they would use.
And what's this crap about someone's "overall value", anyway? Like people are walking around with price tags on their heads or something?
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.