abafte #fundie abafte.blogspot.com
Heliocentricity is not a logically plausible (let alone irrefutable) theory that is based on scientific data but it's actually, purely based on a series of assumptions that were built-up over the last 200 years. For example many (but not all) of the assertions regarding astronomical distances between celestial bodies are invented and put into calculations on the apriori assumption that the earth must be revolving around the sun. But then at the same time, these assumed distances have another function whereby they are deployed as some sort of petitio principii device to indicate that the sun must be at the center because of that distance! Go figure.
Here is one example of how it's done: we are told that sun is too big to revolve around the earth. But wait a minute, isn't the sun's size determined in the first place by assuming how big it must have to be in order to allow a heliocentric premise? Yes it is! Go figure that. Other needed assumptions include:
Lorenzo de Medici
The bendover earth assumption (the alleged 'tilt' of the earth's axis, a desperately needed heliocentric variable that has no basis in the physical world where the sun simply spirals from the Tropic of Cancer to the Tropic of Capricorn annually. Both of these tropic latitude lines are not tilted - they are at a 0° angle (= parallel) to the equator. The word "tropic" itself comes from the Greek term tropos, meaning turn, referring to the fact that the sun "turns back" at these lines that aren't tilted in any way,
The earth supposedly tittering around the sun at various speed levels (it orbits at a faster speed at one time, and then it goes relatively slower at another - then back faster again) but somehow, all this alleged speed-change remains unnoticeable),
The moon also being dragged along exactly at those same speed levels (100% complete synchronization with the wobbly earth despite being hundreds of thousands of miles away from it(!) Now how about that?,
Even atmospheric gas (the air) being attached to the earth's surface (again completely synchronized but somehow (simultaneously) free-flowing enough to blow in every direction). These are just samples of the never shown, never detected, never scientifically observed absurdities that are required to save the appearances of the heliocentric model.