www.gospelink.com

Stephen L Richards #racist gospelink.com

[By Stephen L Richards, who was an LDS apostle and First Counselor in the First Presidency]

In substantiation of this view the writer calls attention to the well-known distinct primary divisions of the human race now on the earth, namely, the Caucasian, the Mongolian, and the Negroid; and that these branches of mankind differ not only in bodily appearance but especially in mental qualities. The black skin of the Negro is not simply an excessive sunburn; no Caucasian becomes black, however long he may reside in tropical climates; and no Negro born and bred in temperate climates ever becomes white. Intermarriage between members of these great racial divisions are possible, but the progeny are usually feeble, not long-lived, and of poor physical quality; and no permanent self-propagating, homogeneous races can be generated by such intermarriages. Hence these different classes of mankind amount in effect to a difference in species. The Caucasian branch is characterized by a very superior inventive and originative power. All the great inventions of the human race and conquest of the natural energies of nature have come to the world through them. The important tools, instruments for land cultivation and food production, the invention of the steam engine, electric motor, telegraph, telephone, railway, steamship, magnetic compass, sewing machine, and an infinity of other inventions have originated through the Caucasian race. The yellow and black races have contributed nothing to this work. They have added nothing to new scientific or philosophical ideas.

Then as regards language, there is a very important difference. The words in the Caucasian language are highly inflected or modulated to express cases, tenses, moods, genders, and sexes, and have special adaptation for conveying abstract ideas or philosophical or scientific concepts. But the Mongolians have none of these qualities. Their words are made by putting together monosyllables. Their language has no proper grammar. The Negro languages are also simple and not adapted for conveying any but the simplest ideas and thoughts.

FRED L.W. BENNETT #fundie gospelink.com

[From an article in Improvement Era, 1926 -- an LDS periodical]

WHY NOT ABOLISH JAZZ?

[...]

Jazz, as has already been pointed out by others, came from the Jungle. It belongs to the savage who cannot produce or appreciate the beauty in music as we of the cultivated and enlightened races are supposed to be capable of doing. If jazz is to be continued because it gives "pep," let those who want that kind of pep hie themselves to a place where they can indulge in it without annoying others who do not like it. No one appreciates a lively, stirring tune more than the writer, but there is a great difference between the banging, rasping sounds associated with jazz and the invigorating airs that might be played. Music can be lively and still possess harmony and rhythm.

Perhaps the writing of this article is a waste of time that could be profitably spent in other work, but the writer has long felt that he must say something on this subject. The pity of it all is our younger people seem to delight in jazz because of a notion that it is offensive to the conservative, and they are never so happy as when they feel they are in revolt. I am convinced that it is this that has sustained jazz so long; surely, surely it cannot be due to a genuine love of it; if so, what are we coming to, or rather going back to? But I have already given a hint as to this!

I cannot see much use in trying to inculcate in the people a love of the beautiful in music whilst jazz is tolerated at the theatres and public dance halls, and even in the amusement halls controlled by the church people. As far as the Latter-day Saints are concerned, why cannot we maintain the excellent standards set up by the recreation committees? Why insist upon music that has been copied from savage tribes?

Janne M. Sjodahl #fundie gospelink.com

[In an LDS commentary; "Doctrine and Covenants Commentary." Here it deals with Section 25, which declares that God delights "in the song of the heart."]

So called "ragtime" breeds frivolity, and appeals to the vulgar. Set to sacred text, it may produce a sensation of distressing incongruity. "Jazz" is an abomination, an evidence of recrudescence of savagery.

Louis Guyon #fundie gospelink.com

" 'War music arouses the best in man, while "jazz" music appeals to the lowest elements in his nature,' says Louis Guyon, a dancing master of Chicago who has won great prosperity for himself by refusing to permit the modern dances to be performed on his mammoth floor. 'I have always fought the "ragtime" dance as immoral, indecent and vulgar, and I have found that thousands of people still felt that the old-time waltz, two-step and polka were totally different from the "jazz" measures.'