#pedo

Hebephilia counts

Show post

Pussymonster #pedo #psycho em.wattpad.com

(from a deep web site called Violent Desires, now shut down)

I create Lolita Slave Toys. In case you are wondering what I mean, it is very simple: I transform young girls into easy, manageable sex toys. That's it. The girls can not walk away, can not resist, can not tell anything; they are just there for your sadistic amusement. Curious how?

[Moderator note: sick shit, the rest of it was deleted. This isn’t why we’re here.]

Show post

Encyclopedia Dramatica #sexist #pedo #psycho encyclopediadramatica.wiki

Despite popular belief, all women enjoy rape. This is because all women are whores. However this doesn't mean that they're all obvious whores. Besides your typical school skank and office slut, whom are clearly whores, there are those known as Secret Sluts.

Secret Sluts are the rarer form, but ultimately a more fun victim to rape. Examples of these are children and virgins. If you can't get a child or don't want to risk it, then find an innocent small-bodied teenager. She will work just as well. Act like you are her friend at first or that you are interested in her, and she should succumb to you right away. These girls are dumb as hell. If you're lucky enough to have gotten a virgin then she should be extra tight. Not only will you cum really fast and very strongly, but there is no better feeling in the world than watching some girl cry in pain as you're popping her cherry. Pull her hair, spank her, even cum in her mouth for added effect. Have her tell you that she likes it, and if she doesn't then threaten to pound her even harder. These girls will just grow up to become sluts anyway, so they might as well get accustomed to the feeling. Make sure you cuddle these girls afterwords though, just to make them feel a little less "raped". Just kidding, tell them to go make you lunch. After she brings you lunch, pop her in the anus for good measure.

Show post

Anonymous #pedo #ableism archive.4plebs.org

(Regarding a picture of Greta Thunberg)

damn, I just got a stiffy seeing her sit directly on her mothers lap like that. really, I'd like to see her sitting on her daddy's lap. that would be really hot

besides, her mother would never consent
then you'd find out how loose it was from the pounding she's taken from her father

why would they ever consent? she's their meal ticket. plus she's retarded. retards should be aborted. sorry not sorry. retards can't ever have a normal life. she's going to end up incredibly unhappy later in life. she'll be told that she should not have kids. she'll see everyone around her happy starting families. she'll end up being an old maid to her parents. at best she'll be some dudes fuck toy.

Show post

Andrew Anglin #pedo #sexist dailystormer.name

Across the world, there are various laws regulating the age at which a female can legally make the decision to have sex. The age is entirely arbitrary, and ranges from as low as 12 to as high as 19, depending on the location. Generally in the developed world, 16 is the accepted norm.

The fact that it fluctuates so much between locations goes to prove that it is without any biological basis. It is visibly evident that there is no biological difference between a girl of 15 years and 11 months and a girl of 16 years.

Making the situation even more ridiculous is the fact that a girl is indeed legally allowed to have sex with boys her own age or younger before she reaches the magic number. Thus it is that she is considered to be entirely capable of issuing consent to a man, it is simply that she is not capable of issuing consent to an older man.

The final layer of absurdity is that it is not the girl who is punished for engaging in the illicit act, but the man whom she has targeted to loose her wiles upon. What this creates is a situation where a girl can target a man for seduction, lie about her age, and get him locked up. Furthermore, governments can potentially entrap a man with a fully developed girl of 15 years and eleven months, sending her to seduce him and then arresting him on crimes against consent.

What exactly is this “consent,” which is so capable of being twisted into various shapes in order to criminalize men?

The legal definition of the term is this:

Voluntary Acquiescence to the proposal of another; the act or result of reaching an accord; a concurrence of minds; actual willingness that an act or an infringement of an interest shall occur.

So, in theory, a woman is incapable of acquiescing to a proposal of sex from a man – but only an older man – until she reaches the mature age of 16 (or whatever the age might be in your region).

The frightening thing is that the concept of “age of consent” assumes that there is ever any age at which a woman is capable of making informed and responsible decisions about something as serious as sexual activity.

However, in America, most adult women are fat. This means that as adults, they are incapable of making proper decisions about what they eat. But somehow we have reached the conclusion that they are capable of making decisions about their reproductive behaviors? This is absurd on the face of it.

As such, it is my view that the concept of consent must be abolished entirely, and women must be disallowed by law from engaging in sexual activity without the permission of a male relative or, if no male relative exists, the state.

The fact that we have the concept of an age of consent in our society means that it is acknowledged by society that there is a state in which a biologically fully developed female is incapable of deciding who she has sex with. And I am not aware of a single “my body, my choice” feminist who takes issue with this.

In other words, from the most staunch conservative to the most radical leftist, we all agree that a woman under the age of 16 is utterly infantile to the point of needing her biological functions restricted by men with guns. I do not see evidence that a woman ever exits this infantile state. In fact, it would appear that women become less capable of managing their lives as they age. A high school girl is generally much better behaved than a college girl, and a female who has graduated college is radically irresponsible. Women are so completely infantile that they will forego their childbearing potential by spending all of their most fertile years drinking, doing drugs and having “consensual” sex with a parade of different men. When the woman reaches thirty, and her looks have faded and she is alone, she will enter a state of confusion and begin blaming others for her unfortunate predicament. Women in their forties and fifties will then get divorces and utterly destroy the lives of every member of their families in order to pursue some type of vague “personal happiness” agenda. Women in their fifties and sixties begin engaging in bizarre and anti-social political activism which serves the sole purpose of harming society at large. It is not until her biology slows down her ability to move freely that a woman ever becomes less dangerous and destructive, less of an existential threat to society at large, less of a public nuisance, than she was at the age of 16.

With so-called “consent,” we have created a system where the completely unregulated sexual desires of women completely control all aspects of society. Women are able to give or deny consent on an industrial scale, and use this mechanism to completely control the behavior of men. They use this power granted them by the state to transform society into something which they apparently believe benefits them, but which does not bring a single objectively good thing to the people. Every outcome we have seen from giving women consent has been negative. We have only barren wombs, incels and broken families to show for embracing the imbecilic concept that a woman is capable of making responsible and informed sexual decisions.

Society does not benefit from women of any age being given sexual consent rights. Men do not benefit from it. Not even the women themselves benefit from it. Nothing good has come from giving women consent rights. The application of Consent Theory was a weird experiment and it failed, and it is time for the state to revoke these rights.

All female “rights” are given to them by men, as is clear by the simple fact that women are not capable of surviving without men, nor are they capable of physically overpowering men. Consent was a privilege given to women by men and it can and must be taken away just as easily. Applied Consent Theory is totally unsustainable due to the anti-natal results, and will eventually lead to a birthrate of zero. We cannot afford to continue to play this ridiculous game.

We need to replace the consent system with a system of strict regulation where the concept of consent is no longer considered. We can call this “no consent at any age.”

Furthermore, it is the woman who chooses to have sex, not the man. A man, particularly a young man, is virtually incapable of resisting sexual urges if a woman throws herself at him. So, it is the woman who should be punished for violating “no consent at any age” laws. Women who violate these rules and engage in unregulated sex need to be punished severely with lashings. A woman who repeatedly breaks consent laws and consents to unregulated sex must be branded on her hand or face with a permanent mark so that all of society can see her disgusting and anti-social crimes.

This is the only way we are going to successfully create a functional society where all stability is not solely dependent on the unbridled sexual desires of infantile women.

Show post

Anonymous #pedo #conspiracy archive.4plebs.org

[corrected to fix atrocious spelling that made it almost illegible]

Nothing disappoints me more about /pol/ than the fact that it is supposedly redpilled, except there is no difference between its thoughts on pedo/heberephebopphilia and what you would hear on the most pozzed mid-80s newscast during the height of the Satanic daycare sexual abuse panic. For all of you agecucks out there, a few questions:

1. How do you explain the fact that age of consent laws were the first thing on the agenda for Jewish and Jewish-backed first wave feminists once they got going? (Age of consent laws were pushed by early feminists even before women's suffrage.) We know that one of the main long term mutual aims of feminists and kikes has been to destroy the family unit and harmony between the genders. Why was pushing an age of consent as important to them then? Why did they just magically happen to do one "good thing" before going on to then destroy society?

2. Some of the greatest men in history lived in times when the age of consent was low. (The age of consent in colonial Delaware was only 7. And, no, you cant use the ‘people didn't live as long back then' excuse because that's not even true. When you account for infant mortality, people who survived past their vulnerable first year generally lived to at least a reasonable 60 or so on average.) Were these men degenerates? Do you really think the men who built the foundations of western society and created the strength of the family unit in the first place were less knowledgeable about the proper relations between men and women than us? Did they just hate children, or not care about their mental wellbeing? Or were they too stupid to notice the wives they took at very young ages growing up to be "traumatized" by the sexual contact they had with them? And all of these fathers willingly married their daughters off into "honific sexual abuse' with no reservations? All of those hypotheses seem unlikely, and pic related shows an example of a happy manage between an older man and a younger girl from prior times. Does this guy !ask like a degenerate to you? Pretty obvious he’d kick the ass of most people an /pol/ for insulting his wife or his marriage and not feel bad about it. You think that in today's degenerate times you could even hope to have a marriage half as successful as his? But you're going to judge him?

3. As we know, the mainstream media nowadays pushes nothing but degeneracy and filth. Everything they say is perfectly crafted to manipulate the white race into destroying itself. And yet their views an pedo/heberephebaphilia and age-disparate relationships line up perfectly with /pol/’s. (No, a few clickbait articles on Salon do not erase the vast amount of effort over decades the mainstream media has spent decrying age-disparate relationships.) Why are you believing what the bluepill media tells you hook, line, and sinker on just this one issue? They're trying to destroy your society, heritage, and culture on every other issue, but they just happen to be right about this one thing? Or do you think it’s somehow some sort of coincidence that you have such strong feelings about possibly the most propagandized-against issue in human history?

The truth that we can be see in our daily lives is that women only truly have any sort of respect for men that they originally formed a relationship with when they were younger, in the same way that (most) women, despite their whorish ways, tend to have some respect far their father. As they grow older, their ability to farm paternal attachments wears off, and they lose the ability to truly respect a man (other than an a primal level of having a temporary lust for chad so long as he never shows any emotional vulnerability or human qualities) ever again. This paternal respect, in which the woman follows the man as apposed to falsely viewing herself his equal, is a key element in proper romance between men and women, which is why our truly redpilled ancestors who were completely untouched by kike propaganda married young women. It was simply obvious to them. They knew that leaving women to sit until they tuned ages like 18 simply made them spoiled and bitter. You ever seen a really hot girl with an average/somewhat ugly dude? I have to, and most of them met when the girl was very young. He is no chad, but because he formed such a crucial part of her development, she is attached to her partner in a way that she never could be to chad, and wouldn't dream of leaving.

We also know that the ideal breeding age and age of peak fertility, scientifically speaking, for a woman is around 13 or 14. So what do you trust to lead you toward proper breeding habits, Jewish propaganda or your own living body? Adhering to the ridiculous age of consent of 18 (or even 16 or 17) is suicide for the white race, and one of the primary causes of the breakdown of modem relationships. A man should begin courting a girl as soon as possible, to ensure tat a proper paternal attachment between him and her is formed, and should begin engaging in sexual conduct with her as soon as her biology, not kike hickory, deems she's ready. (And as long as he stays loyal to her for life as she should, after decades of such contact with him, it won't matter one bit to her whether she started at 14 or 18.)

The primary goal of a woman/girl in life is to find one man, and devote the entirety of her feminine resources to him (affection, loyalty, sex, child-rearing, housekeeping, etc.) to support his masculine endeavors throughout his life. This is the way we were programmed, and any other relationship arrangement is inferior. And it doesn't make any difference whether she starts at 12 or 18, other than that waiting until 13 gives her no stable male romantic influence to lead her through puberty and into adulthood, allowing far all sods of degenerate influences to crawl into her life and lead her astray from her proper path. Quit getting kiked /pol/. Don't take my word for it. Instead of trying to make a diamond out of the coal of washed up, legal whores, find a 13 or 14 year old QT and flirt with her a bit. You don't even have to do anything that will put you at any legal risk. Just court her a bit, and feel the difference between a girl who still has that uniquely feminine natural respect and admiration for you and your average adult stay slut. I guarantee you that it wont be long before you're ready to find one and help develop her into a proper woman to eventually marry, cementing your place in her mind for life and creating an unassailable band between you Ma. Or you can keep hunting in the trash can far Jamal's leftovers. It's your choice.

Show post

Caamib #pedo #psycho pro-rape.com

(Talking about a video in which a 10 year-old girl giving birth can be seen)

Jesus fucking christ... that segment with her giving birth got me so horny that I had to masturbate right away even with me being a no fapper. I don't think it will do anything to cause penile sensitivity again in any case, since I came in about 10 seconds of fapping, barely having to touch my dick.

Show post

Chechar AKA Cesar Tort #pedo #homophobia chechar.files.wordpress.com

(By “ephebes”, he means androgynous teenage boys who look like women)

I am not a homo for the simple reason that I’d find repugnant any contact with a masculine face, and its body. And no: I am not ashamed for what I said in that thread at all. Precisely because they try to imitate them, queers represent a blasphemous insult to the nymphs and the underage ephebes. Faggots are like massive bears with the heart of a butterfly. Comparing Gitone with any of them is like comparing a vulgar, Felliniesque fat harlot with the Florentine Fete girls that appear on the cover of this book.

The so-called gay movement is like an Australopithecus africanus, after touching the black monolith of 2001: A Space Odyssey, has a glimpse of the mysterium tremendum of the universe. Alas, unlike the film this ape immediately fancies himself the astronaut Dave Bowman ready for the second leap forward in the path to Overman. Or even worse: he believes that he now wears a white miniskirt like the one that Ascyltus threw over Gitone in the Fellini film, and he further believes that the other apes will now consider this still primitive, apeish missing link as if he was a consecrated soprano of the future worth to listen and contemplate.

Nowadays, it does not occur to these Australopithecuses that a huge, four-and-a-half million leap forward is necessary for that specific dream to become true, or that presently only the androgynous ephebes, premature embryos of a yet not verified future, have the right of homosexuality—and only during his tender teens.

Show post

BabyFuck McGirlsex #sexist #pedo incels.co

[It's Over] The Phantom Pain

Why are we still here?!............Just to suffer?!

Every night in my dreams, I can feel the loving embrace of the Stacy's i never had ...

And i can feel the joy of having a hormonally charged teen romance that i never had...

I can even feel the passionate kisses from the soft lips of the teen virgin Stacy foidlet that i never had....

When i dream of all the genuine romantic and sexual conquests I've never had and will never have...i feel a sharp pain in my heart

When i think of all the PUA gimmics i've tried but never got results from....i feel a crushing weight in my soul

When i think about how only a few millimetres of bone in my skull could gave prevented this - my heart bleeds

And it won't stop hurting... It's like a cancer eating me alive from the inside

This curse of Inceldom hurts like a PHANTOM PAIN, the pain of inceldom hurts like being stabbed by a thousand swords

You feel it too, don't you???!!!

Show post

Caamib #pedo #psycho rgif.is

(Title: I had a sex dream about my daughter)

In it she was 12 and we were having sex with her legs on my shoulders. I don't know how I knew she 12 in a dream but it's one of those things you're sort of "aware" of in a dream. I didn't really see her face or remember it... Anyway, I was railing her snatch like there was no tomorrow (I know the feeling in this position since I had sex with some girl in it couple of times) and I came in her, only to suddenly wake up disappointed and... well, messy down there. I am a no-fapper so I have such dreams occasionally (if I haven't ejaculated in a woman for a longer time) so this is not new to me but none of my previous dreams were that graphic.

Irredeemable Monster Award

Content warning: advocacy of child rape

Show post

Leucosticte and Zesto #pedo #psycho #sexist #racist rgif.is

[From "[Rapefuel] Don't forget, there's such a thing as second-chance adoptions"]

OP of the thread by Leucosticte:

You can adopt a 10-year-old girl and not have to wait as long for her to hit puberty. When Families Un-Adopt a Child - The Atlantic - Pocket

Sadly, a lot of them are niglets instead of cute white forbiddens:

Comment by Zesto:

Idk we have a fucked up system in this country.

What's the difference between that and foster children?

Seems like a better deal with the foster kids, the government pays you plus they get raped all the time.

Especially by the government.

Show post

Caamib #pedo #psycho rgif.is

Maybe I should look up my daughter when she's already 11?

It wouldn't make that much of a difference and might save me an year of waiting. Judging by her mother she'll be a complete slut so why bother waiting until she's 12? Plus they might move in an year.

Show post

Various incels #pedo #sexist incels.co

RE: [RageFuel] Made an r/amithesoyhole bait post about not wanting my 14 year old daughter to railed. Reddit once again reveals themselves as pedophiles.

(AlexanderTheGreat11)

The comment of that guy saying he was banging his gf everyday after school when he was 13(feelsree)

(Words2_live_bye)

ragefuel. These same people then argue and call you a pedo when you say you wanna smash a 13 - 17 year old. JFL
girls in this age range DO have sex drive and desire for sex.

(Edmund_Kemper)

AITA is a shitty subreddit of retarded faggots. They think it’s ok for for 12 year olds to look at porn and use sex toys but they get mad at a 40 year old man dating a 20 year old foid. That subreddit’s morals are retarded

(Hate_my_life)

To all our reddit friends:
Please cool it with the hate. Incels.co is a forum of peace. Look at this disgusting display of misogyny and toxic masculinity in a pile of pancakes, batman!

image

This does not surprise me at all. The language is so creepy and weird. "I immediately reacted negatively and told my wife to keep our daughter away from these boys when I'm not around." (where the heck are you going?) and "I instructed my wife that our daughter doesn't need to be engaging in sexual activity at all. This dude has never been in a relationship before and it shows. Also lmao just because he didn't get any at 13 he thinks other boys don't? When I was in middle school I knew dudes that were getting head when they were 12.

Nobody has sex at 13 (Soyface emojis). It's normal to be a virgin to your late 20s (Soyface emojis).

(Subhuman Currycel)

The comment of that guy saying he was banging his gf everyday after school when he was 13

I can’t believe him and me are males from the same species fuck my life. Remember a few nanomenters of DNA all it takes.

(Gymcelled)

The comment of that guy saying he was banging his gf everyday after school when he was 13

Our lives are so different to what they could have been, had we been born with the right face/height.

(Mainländer)

Those people think it's ok for your 14 yo daughter to be gangbanged by Chads her age and if you have anything to say against it your a misogynist, but if someone older, even if 17 or something, even peck kisses her, he's a rapist. I wish they were just a handful of retards, but tons of people think this way nowadays. It's mind-boggling.

Just the other day I read someone on IT saying about a 14 yo hypothetically having sex with another 14 yo: "as long as it's consensual, it's ok - oh, and btw, 14 yos can't consent". Do these people even stop for a minute to analyze how they think, or at the very least what they write?

(ScornedStoic)

This is what I don't get. It's okay for a 14 year old to be a slut for other 14 y.o.s but if I want to provide for one and genuinely make her happy in a monogamous marriage (preferably virginal) why am I a monster?

If you want to do stuff that will make society less degenerate and feminist you're a monster, basically.

I just want to be left alone if for some reason in some universe I was able to get a jb to fall in love with me. Is that so much to ask?

(Wizard32)

Teen girls are not prepubescent, so using attraction to them to call people pedophiles is a bunch of anti-male feminist propaganda.

"Hebephile" if you must, toward those who prefer them (noting that inclusion is not preference, of course) but the idea that we should label this as some kind of paraphilia is wrong, because it isn't any more fetishistic than preferring a specific sex/gender or preferring a specific ethnicity/race or preferring beautiful to ugly, having a height preference, a smell preference, a hair color preference, etc.

Preferences (particularly slight ones) don't need medical terms for them when there isn't anything unhealthy about them. Especially since it leads to the demonizing of slight preferences and implying they are dramatic fixations when they usually are not.

Calling teens "children" is misleading. Yes, modern legal classification of "minor" is synonymous with that, but in general practice we use terms like "adolescent" rather than "child" or "kid" to refer to people in-between being an infant and an adult.

This type of language is used to minimize the maturity/intelligence/experience of teens, to ignore their biological readiness, to demonize normal male attraction to healthy fertile females.

If you buy into thinking 14 is too young, you're just mentally cucking yourself (poor biddy) as a coping mechanism to deal with being denied the freshest pussy by our present matriarchy.

(nazianime)

Honestly an older male would be a better companion for a young girl. Theoretically if a male has a high paying job, his own home and transportation and still has time in the day left. It would be ideal, because a man that is a college educated and already has life experience can be a treasure trove of information. This would only work if she was committed to learn and respect. But parents don’t teach that.

But you are a monster according to IT for trying to provide a show of real respect and commitment to a girl.

Show post

Napoleon de Geso #pedo incels.co

[RageFuel] Anti-lolicons are guilty for my problems with finding waifu

Teen girls are shit in absolute majority of cases. But atleast could try searching for those who atleast to some extent really different and special. But now it's kinda pointless, even if be possible to find that special cute teen girl - world against us, with all rules and "laws", and overprotective daddies of teen girls

Anti-lolicon cucks and cuckcels are to be blamed for my suffering

Why not to find mature woman (if that even possible at all)? Why not to cuck myself, why not, after lonely teen years, when others enjoyed teen love, to work hard for getting nasty leftovers

Today I fap to cute animu lolis, and cucks with cuckcels deserve special place in hell

Show post

Leg End #psycho #pedo escapistmagazine.com


Joe Mc'techdude is a technician who has never missed a day of work, is bright, works hard, and never asks for a raise. You don't personally know Joe, but you've heard a -lot- of good things about them.

One day, Joe gets arrested for sexually assaulting a child. You do not know the age of the child, how he feels on the matter, if it's actually true, etc. ALL YOU KNOW is that he was arrested for sexually assaulting a child.
Many years later, after being released from prison, he has been filed in the system for his crime, and everyone on your block has been informed of what he is.

For some reason, you are an owner of a local electronics/general tech-goods store.
....
You are now given a choice, you may not ask any questions to Joe regarding his past. You must choose if you hire him on the spot, or if you don't hire him at all. Do you hire him?

Yes. Hired then and there. His past has no meaning as to whether or not he can fix what needs fixin. He served his time. Though, I'll look into the details later.

If a customer comes in and doesn't like it, then they can kindly get the hell out of my fucking store, because they are probably not going to be a very nice customer.

Everyone deserves a second chance. And, if it is a case of "Statutory Rape", then I have no ill, because that charge is bullshit.

Though, if I find out he had sex with say... a 7 year old girl, well... it had better been consensual, not full on rape.

If rape, I'm not going to like him much at first. But, if the alleged victim forgives him, no hard feelings in my book.

Seriously, have you ever met an actual 7 year old? There's no way they have anything like the maturity level to consent, and claiming so is a common justification child abusers use for their crimes (not saying that you would).

Actually, many seven year olds actually do have such maturity. Hell, I know a 5 year old with more maturity than one of my 35 year old friends. Yes, he indeed needs to stop making dick jokes.

Show post

Rassimov #pedo #sexist incels.co

Women are to blame for men being into underage girls

I've already written about this; there exists a whole class of men who cannot attract women their own age as they enter their 20s, yet they remain attractive to girls between the ages of 13-17. Why? Because they aren't quite truecel, yet they never develop into traditionally handsome men "real women" crave for. Their youthful looks become a curse when it comes to attracting women past their rebellious teen phases. My two female cousins are perfect examples of this transition of preferences; the older one who is almost 19 likes masculine types with buzzed hair, the younger one is 14 and thinks Kylo Ren is the pinnacle of male aesthetics, the older one considers him plain ugly. JFL, it's a matter of time they both go Chad only.

Notice how younger teen girls would still have a diverse array of crushes that include "artsy" unconventional types who are skinny, pale men with narrow jaws and unique features, but by the time she's 20 she cringes at her former crush asking herself "Eww... what was I thinking?". Girls are pretty much basic-bitches by the time they enter their 20s and the only two acceptable standards becomes either; ripped Chad or dad-bod Chad.


tl;dr: A whole generation of aging twinks will be forced to chose between statutory rape or inceldom.

Show post

Caamib #sexist #pedo #psycho twitter.com

Those opposing incel violence should remember that a) this violence is caused by deprivations no sentient being should feel b) they don't oppose violence against straight white males. To them, these are all lice that must be exterminated.

Your idea rests on the incorrect assumption that "children" (a term which you use even for older teens like those at 17) are somehow inherently incapable of giving consent. It is not so. In the past some girls entered marriage even at 10 years old.

I'm sorry your 13 year-old daughter got ran over and killed, Ms. Smith, but at least no dirty male looked at her ! So rejoice about that, as it is far more important.

Any decent man masturbating must have his fingers broken. Your penis is a weapon. Use it.

I'd beat the living fuck of any woman who claimed to be incel.

If you're wanted by any modern Western woman there is something wrong with you. Only non-consensual sex with modern Western women is right.

If my grandfather opened fire on women in his town during the 1940s they'd be disgusted and scared. Modern Women would be attracted....

Show post

BIBLICALGENDERROLES #sexist #pedo #fundie biblicalgenderroles.com

(The following paragraphs are fragments from an article called “The World of The Handmaid’s Tale: Not Completely Bad”)

I have already addressed the fact that the nation of Gilead was wrong in usurping the authority of father’s over their daughters. But what if fathers willingly gave their young daughters, even those in their early teens as portrayed in arranged marriages to older men – is this a violation of Biblical morality?

The answer is a resounding NO. It is not immoral or “abhorrent” or “horrific” in the eyes of God. The Scriptures tell us in two passages when God says a young woman is ready for marriage.

In the book of Ezekiel God portrays his marriage to Israel as an older man taking a young woman who has shown the signs of puberty as his wife:

“7 I have caused thee to multiply as the bud of the field, and thou hast increased and waxen great, and thou art come to excellent ornaments: thy breasts are fashioned, and thine hair is grown, whereas thou wast naked and bare.

8 Now when I passed by thee, and looked upon thee, behold, thy time was the time of love; and I spread my skirt over thee, and covered thy nakedness: yea, I sware unto thee, and entered into a covenant with thee, saith the Lord God, and thou becamest mine.”

Ezekiel 16:7-8 (KJV)

And in the New Testament the Apostle Paul gives us another qualification for when a girl becomes a woman and is ready to be married:

“36 But if any man think that he behaveth himself uncomely toward his virgin, if she pass the flower of her age, and need so require, let him do what he will, he sinneth not: let them marry.”

I Corinthians 7:36 (KJV)

The phrase “if she pass the flower of her age” refers to if she has had a period.

So, God’s allowable age for marriage to a woman is when she shows the signs of puberty, development of her breasts, growth of pubic hair and she has had a period. At that point it is perfectly moral for her to be married.

And her “consent” is not required by God. And God does not grant her the “agency” that we believe women have today. It is her father’s decision (Exodus 22:16-17). And there is absolutely nothing unbiblical about arranged marriages (Jeremiah 29:6). Also, it is not immoral for men much older to marry younger women.

Show post

128730 #sexist #wingnut #pedo reddit.com

[OP of "Allowing men to marry younger women would fix things?"]

So NRx is about returning social mores to a state that would be more in line with what humans have done historically, right? Well, historically, even in the Western states that most NRx models for an ideal government are based on, men could marry girls way younger than 18. Why was this done? Why was it changed in recent times?

I think the change in that custom was brought about intentionally (as intentionally as anything in the Cathedral is done; I'm not implying that there was an evil cabal of fat lesbian feminists that unilaterally succeeded in taking women away from men, although the desire definitely does exist on their part) , as a means of "undermining patriarchy" (aka shit-testing society). My reasoning is as follows:

A big part of Cathedral dogma is that women need to be educated in order to become strawng and independent and better than men, because Equality. The only way women could begin to do that is if men stopped marrying them as virgins at 13 and forcing them to have and raise children. So my idea is that pedophilia actually helps patriarchy, in that women are more likely to be married, having children, only having sex with one guy, not getting divorced etc, if all they know is powerful older man dick and authority. Changing the laws and customs regarding "pedophilia" was a big step toward current clown world nuttery.

So....Islam is right on women? Maybe the part about marrying women off early is right. I don't know about the polygamy part though. Seems like a good way to have hordes of angry horny men around is to make it so that only a few men have access to most of the women; and in fact this extreme sexual deprivation and the resultant frustration is what fuels Jihadism.

I don't know about the bugging 9 year olds part either. I think prepubescence is too early to get started on explicitly sexual domination of women. Little boy buggery and diddling is totally out of the question.

I know this isn't an original thought in NRx circles, but I think its worth bringing up here on Plebbit where tons of newbs and others may see it.

EDIT: By pedophilia I mean anything that would be classed as statutory rape in the US. Sorry I didn't clarify that.

Show post

David J. Stewart #sexist #pedo jesus-is-savior.com

A Century Ago Versus Today

Women are no longer approachable (including Christian women). A century ago little girls all played with dolls, wore dresses and cherished the thought of becoming a wife and mother someday. Boys did chores, mowed neighbour's lawns and learned to work and be responsible at a very young age. So by the time they were 14 years old, young men were mature, and young women were mature. They often married young in the southern states at age 14 and stayed married for life! Men went to work and provided for the family, and women stayed home to care for her family, preparing a proper dinner for a couple hours, helping the kids with their school work, and having plenty of duties to keep herself busy. Women loved their husbands back then, and were honored to be a homemaker, because that is what all the other women were also doing. Those were the good old days!

Show post

David J. Stewart #fundie #pedo #sexist jesusisprecious.org

The Holy Bible mentions “THE ATTIRE OF AN HARLOT.” A “harlot” is a woman who engages in sexual intercourse for money. This is also called “carnal knowledge.” So, we can conclude that there is a certain type of clothing that a girl or woman can wear that sends a wrong message to boys and men, lacking good moral character and sense. In the case of younger girls dressing immodestly, it evidences clearly that the mother is a fool, lacking sense and moral character.

Let me tell you something, those little 8 and 9-year-old girls on the popular TV show “Dance Moms” are little whores in the making. They dress promiscuously, immodestly and dance sensually. They are small children and don't know any better, but their mothers DO know better. Those little girls are clothed in the ATTIRE OF AN HARLOT! The ugly reality is that there are lustful and ungodly men out there in TV land watching them, and there always will be, with lasciviousness building in their heart. Lascivious means “unhealthy sexual desires.” There is a point where God-given normal passions become sinful, and it is the line between sexual immorality verses holy matrimony. God is holy, holy, holy!!!

You are a fool if you think that grown men don't have sexual desires for those young girls. If they dress like harlots, and gyrate promiscuously in public, men are going to lust, or worse. 1st Peter 2:11, “Dearly beloved, I beseech you as strangers and pilgrims, abstain from fleshly lusts, which war against the soul.” We've got a bunch of stupid mamas in America. I've heard malicious people refer to fallen Christian leaders as “pedophiles” for having carnal knowledge with a 16-year-old girl. Although it is a sin outside of marriage, that is a wicked thing to say, because a 16-year-old girl is well beyond the flower of her age (puberty). I'm not justifying sin, I'm just saying that such a man is not a pedophile. To say otherwise is to bear false witness!

I wrote this article to take a stand for the Biblical truth that sexual immorality is often caused by unholy attire. The word “subtil” in Proverbs 7:10 comes from the Hebrew word natsar, which means, “to conceal.” The woman wearing whorish attire (e.g., Katy Perry, Miley Cyrus and Taylor Swift) is subtil of heart. That is, she is an actor. She'll pretend to be your friend, like Taylor Swift does, but her true agenda is to corrupt your moral values and bring you low. Sex is the God of Satanism! America's youth are under satanic attack! The sensual and raunchy music videos by Vevo, VH1 and MTV are of the Devil. They want your soul young person!!! You ought to listen to Bible-preachers young people, “for they watch for your souls” (Hebrews 13:17b).

Show post

Napoleon de Geso #pedo incels.co

[Experiment]Would you better bang too old female, or to young (by your personal standards)?

13 is perfect ripe age, and do not want younger ones, but I better would bang too young and not riped yet, than wall hitter roastie

(Poll: “If possibility given, if necessary to do, which you would bang?”)
“too young”: 59 votes/90.8%
“too old”: 6 votes/9.2%

Show post

OverBeforeItBegan & FidelCashflow #sexist #pedo incels.co

RE: [SuicideFuel] Ultimate suicidefuel for those that didnt experience teen love.

(OverBeforeItBegan)

This is real suicidefuel. Missing out on a female in her prime. I always laugh at incels who cry about not being able to find a wife and make her shit out kids.
A wife is guaranteed to be old and used by other men. A prime teen virgin gf is not.

(FidelCashflow)

I dont understand these fags that's dream is to marry some girl and live happily ever after. My ideal life would be to fuck around with tons of girls and then marry some younger female when I'm in my late 40's. But sadly I'm a subhuman so this was never an option

Show post

EpsteinIsInnocent #pedo reddit.com

[OP of "So, a couple of things about Jeffrey Epstein"]

The overwhelming body of evidence point to Jeffrey epstein being an ephebophile, NOT a pedophile

Historically, ephebophilia was considered natural and normal. In fact, it only became taboo in the 1960s. Pedophilia was always considered wrong.

Original lost but post saved here

Show post

BoyWiki #pedo boywiki.org

[From article "Little boy lover (dictionary)", last version since 14:47, 14 April 2014]

A little boy lover, or LBL, is a boylover with a low age of attraction. The exact definition of 'low age of attraction' seems to vary, usually within the single digits. AOAs may span from 1 to 9.

There is a stylized version of the BLogo called the LBLogo, which was created as a source of pride for LBLs who have at times felt marginalized by boylovers who are attracted mainly to older boys.

Show post

BoyWiki #pedo boywiki.org

[From the latest version of the article "Pedophilia" as of 02:46, 4 February 2019]

Pedophilia (or paedophilia, originally Greek παιδοφιλια; "love of boys") is sexual attraction to pre-pubescent children. While the exact definition varies by context, it commonly refers to the medical definition defined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders published by the American Psychiatric Association. The correct term for an attraction to adolescents is ephebophilia.

Those who meet the criteria set above are classed as pedophiles. Common usage do not follow the strict medical definitions of an adult or teen who is attracted to prepubescent children, but often refers to any adult who is attracted to, or has sexual contact with, any person under the age of consent, or the age of majority (16-18 in most western countries).

In many societies and cultures, the term pedophile is highly stigmatized and represents an image of an evil, callous monster. This spurs many self-identified pedophiles to adopt names such as boylover, minor-attracted adult, girllover, and childlover, among others, to assist in differentiating themselves and their values from this Invented stereotype.

Some believe that pedophiles have made great contributions to past societies, and that their influence is often ignored or their attraction to children is greatly played down. (See Pedophilic genius.) Others disagree with this idea, and claim that alleged historical pedophiles actually preferred the company of persons who were in their late teens or early 20s: that is, they were hebephiles.

For information on child-love, see:

http://web.archive.org/web/20051101165116/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Childlove_movement

Pedophilia's essence does not reside in exploitation, assault or harm to others, and some pedophiles look also for the child’s friendship and love. Pedophilia means, in Greek, love of boys

Show post

biblicalgenderroles #sexist #pedo #fundie biblicalgenderroles.com

Early Teen Women Are More Moldable

In the Scriptures we read the following passage from the Book of Jeremiah:

“1 The word which came to Jeremiah from the Lord, saying,

2 Arise, and go down to the potter’s house, and there I will cause thee to hear my words. 3 Then I went down to the potter’s house, and, behold, he wrought a work on the wheels. 4 And the vessel that he made of clay was marred in the hand of the potter: so he made it again another vessel, as seemed good to the potter to make it.

5 Then the word of the Lord came to me, saying, 6 O house of Israel, cannot I do with you as this potter? saith the Lord. Behold, as the clay is in the potter’s hand, so are ye in mine hand, O house of Israel.”

Jeremiah 18:1-6 (KJV)

In the above passage God is speaking to Israel as his wife. The phrase “O house of Israel” is used in other passages like this one below when God refers to Israel as his wife and he as her husband:

“Surely as a wife treacherously departeth from her husband, so have ye dealt treacherously with me, O house of Israel, saith the Lord.”

Jeremiah 3:20 (KJV)

Just as God sought to mold his wife Israel to be the person, he wanted her to be, so to for a marriage to be successful a woman must be very moldable just like clay in the hands of a potter.

When women are in their early teens, they typically are more moldable but as they get older into their late teens and especially early 20s, they become much harder to mold or change in their person and habits.

And make no mistake this is EXACTLY why most people today oppose women marrying very young because they know they are so impressionable or moldable at that age. They don’t want men being able to mold young women so they want to delay marriage as a long as possible pushing it into the early and mid-20s.
Christians who follow this false philosophy that young women need “find themselves” and “be their own person” before marriage are going against God’s design.

Remember that God says marriage is a picture of Christ and the Church. Does Christ mold his church? You bet he does. And he tells men to love their wives as he does:

“25 Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it; 26 That he might sanctify and cleanse it with the washing of water by the word, 27 That he might present it to himself a glorious church, not having spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing; but that it should be holy and without blemish.”

Ephesians 5:25-27 (KJV)

We are often told today that if a man attempts to mold or change his wife’s behavior at all that he is “controlling” and this bad. We are told that if a man truly loves his wife, he won’t try to change anything about her.

Well I can tell you based on the authority of the Scriptures above that if a man does not attempt to mold and shape his wife to present her to himself and to God as a glorious wife in the same way Christ does his church then he is not loving his wife as Christ loves the church.

And yes, it takes a sacrifice on our part as men and courage on our part as men to “rebuke and chasten” (Revelation 3:19) our wives as Christ does his churches. But when done in the correct spirit, such rebuke and chastening by husbands is called “love”.

Show post

wizardcel #homophobia #pedo #psycho incels.co

[Serious] If I had a son, I'd want him to be a lolicon instead of a degenerate faggot.

Imagine how sad it must be for a father to be told that his son takes it in the butt. For it's written that " Thou shall not lie with man, as with a woman: it's an abomination."

On the other hand, we have a tremendous lifefuel straight from God above. I quote " ... Kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him, but all women children ( JBs), that hath not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves."

God approves of men of culture, but he condemns men who like to smell other men's poop.

Show post

Warlock791 & GigaSpergcel #sexist #pedo reddit.com

(Warlock791)

From a biological perspective, that's perfectly normal and healthy.

Society has imposed the arbitrary number of 18 because they want foids to get educated and they know how hard it is for the roasties to keep their roast beef in their pants.

If society wasn't brainwashing men into thinking that women younger than 18 (but older than 13) are children, those underage teens would be getting pregnant all of the time and the foid education project would have failed very quickly and spectacularly.

(GigaSpergcel)

Reminder that foid education is one of the most useless wastes of tax money. Firstly, they do not have the drive and disagreeableness to actually get impressive things done. Secondly, most of foids become homemaker anyhow, as it should be, or work in like retail where you do not need general education. Lastly, educated women are much more hypergamous, which contributed to the incel problem which in turn are a massive burden on the economy because they are demotivated, depressed and destructive as fuck

Show post

Michael Folmer #pedo attorneygeneral.gov

HARRISBURG- Attorney General Josh Shapiro tonight announced charges against Pennsylvania State Senator Michael Folmer for possession of child pornography. The investigation began as a result of a CyberTip reporting that an electronic service provider, Tumblr, discovered that a user had uploaded an image of child pornography using their application. The investigation led to the home of Michael Folmer in Lebanon, PA. The Office of Attorney General ‘s Child Predator Section, Lebanon City Police Department, and U.S. Department of Homeland Security executed a search warrant on Tuesday and found images of child pornography on the defendant’s phone. The defendant was charged Tuesday evening with Sexual Abuse of Children, Possession of Child Pornography, and Criminal Use of a Communication Facility.
“This defendant serves as a state Senator and was entrusted to honor and represent his community in the Pennsylvania Capitol,” said Attorney General Josh Shapiro. “Tonight, our Office arrested Mr. Folmer for possession of child pornography and charged him with Sexual Abuse of Children, Possession of Child Pornography, and Criminal Use of a Communication Facility. I will continue to say it—no one is above the law, no matter what position of power they hold. I will continue to work to protect children and hold those who abuse them accountable.”
The case will be prosecuted by Senior Deputy Attorney General Christopher Jones. All charges discussed are accusations. The defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.

Show post

SchrodingersDick #sexist #pedo incels.co

Re: [News] Peter Cook, age 60, engaged to a 21 year old foid. Women all pissed off online, most of them old

These people don’t realize pedophilia is attraction to prepubescent children, not a 21 year old

Their beef is not about some arbitrary age threshold like 18. Their beef is about men the same age as them, at the height of their sexual attractiveness/SMV, wanting to fuck younger women. Their beef is basically with age having a huge bearing on female SMV. Old roastie want 60 year old rich chad. They don’t want the younger girls ot have him. They fucking seethe when they see this. They would rather female SMV be based in factors they CAN control. Like a college degree and a career. They would rather “experience” and “maturity” be sexy, than youth, chastity, and innocence.

Show post

BlkPillPres #pedo #dunning-kruger incels.co

[Blackpill] [Hard To Swallow Edition] Incels Who Don't Want JB Females Ironically Likely Could Not Satisfy A "Mature" Woman

To all the incels who like to say these females look like "little boys" and you could never be attracted to a female like that, you want a "le real woman"

Really think about what you are saying and your circumstances, I'm an honest person, and I'm especially honest with myself, which is why I never really fall into copes/delusions about what I'm capable of and what I can achieve (this way of thinking seems to be the opposite for a lot of incels who don't really think things through)

I've always thought about the insult - "you can't handle a "real woman" X", and if I'm being honest, under the concept of what a "real woman" is when it comes to body type, I have to agree

I have barely 5 inches of penis, I can't do shit in the doggy style position to a woman with a big ass on that note. A larger woman of an older age group is more likely than not going to have a larger vaginal canal than a young petite teen girl, so I am less likely to physically satisfy such a woman, that's just common sense, an incel trying to aim for "huge stacked bitches" is seriously coping, you can't do shit for that bitch, even if she decides to fuck you, it would likely just end in mutual disappointment, you in your performance and her in your performance too JFL, it all falls on you

Most incels do not have the dick size nor physical strength to even properly fuck and man handle the kind of woman they proclaim to want, so when I hear an incel speak as if he only wants tall women with big breasts and ass, I think you are either a fakecel because you have the looks and physical capabilities to get and handle such a woman (make her want to stay), or you are coping hardcore because having these standards at least makes you "feel like a real man" and that's what counts to you

Responses to men who say they want JB just sounds like shaming tactics, a lot like something a woman would use - "Don't you want a "real woman" and not a little girl for a weak little men"

What happens if an incel is just honest with themselves:
"No, realistically I can't satisfy what you would call a "real woman" and nor would she want me, whilst a JB I could very easily satisfy, what next, what should I do, the ball is in your court?"

A lot of incels seem to cope with having the sexual attraction of "a real man" because that's all they really have since they'll never get such a woman. Ironically though they could never physically satisfy such a woman and more likely could satisfy a woman they consider "undeveloped"

They literally would reject the only kind of woman that they could satisfy and keep wanting them, but they prefer their attraction to a woman they could never satisfy and would never stay with them, because it "makes them feel like a man"

Incels would be more likely to "ascend" and keep a woman, if they targeted women who have a body type that they would consider "undeveloped"

Show post

Napoleon De Geso #wingnut #sexist #pedo incels.co

[Based] What is real culture

Real culture is having honor, values, and morals. Education is just outer level. And a lot of people are cultured just superficially, have culture just on surface, but inside are rotten. Especially femoids - she has read a lot of books, but she also sucked a lot of dicks. Commitment to superfically cultured cunt like this is dishonor, and noculture

And so being lolicon is sign of real culture, as it is desire for honor and purity. Teen girls sometimes have it, they may be not very educated, not "formed personalities", but if they not sluts [yet] - that is most important. And so sad to see them loosing culture by becoming sluts, and trying to save them is made illegal in this degeneracy. Times of barbarism, teen fuckboy can destroy girl's culture, and elder man must be slave for rotten filthy whore. I refuse it, I am man of culture

Show post

Some incels #sexist #pedo reddit.com

(cocoslaygurl)

Holy shit have you seen teen girls today?

My ugly ass never leaves the house but I offered to help my mom at the yearly 4th of July party our town holds.

I spent a few hours there, with hundreds of different teenagers in attendance, and holy shit have you seen girls lately?

Literally every single one of them was dressed in shorts about 4 inches long with shirts that barely came past the middle of their stomachs.

They might as well have been naked. I wanted to fuck one so bad.

Oh and every one of them had a platoon of faggot ass dudes hovered around them trying to be the entertaining clown, while one or two chads of the group stare at their phones while the girls give them sex eyes.

You might be a pedo my man

I’m not a pedo. These girls look like they’re in their 20s.

It’s funny how society made it its mission to make young teens grow up fast and dress like whores — and now that that’s exactly what’s happened — everyone is told they’re not supposed to look at them.

(Lucifersrumpenis)

If he said 9-year-old girls, then yeah. Teens are sexually developed young women.

There's a difference between an 18 or 19 and 13 and 14.

Not much. At least mentally. Still as stuck up, vain, rude, and prone to Chad chasing in both age groups. Foids don't develop much mentally past the age of 13.

They don't but what I said stands. Sorry, if you're attracted to such a young human being you are DrPizza.

Dr. Pizza is into prepubescent children which is pedophilia. Teens are not the same thing.

Are you going to espouse the "difference" between paedophilia and ephebophilia?

As much as one can hate moral guardians, there's a reason why in the eyes of the law the former and the latter is one and the same.

When I go around looking at them it's not like they have their age in shining numbers above their head. If I'm attracted it's because their body is fully developed. Am I supposed to go up and ask to see their ID so I know if I'm allowed to have a boner or not?

(LightofFate)

Sums up every social circle in existence.

Orbiters jester for the girls, girls bang the few chads, then they go to the orbiters for moral support, rise and repeat..

If a girl has gone through puberty and you find her attractive that is called NORMAL. They look the same as they will at 18 in many cases.

We get it you want to fuck kids and are trying to justify it. You incels deserve all the shit you get

LOL That's not what I said but yes I'd love to fuck a 16 old girl.

Too bad you’ll never fuck anyone

1outz G

(le_capitalist_scum)

they are all dressed like dirty sluts, it baffles me just how much our society declined.

from a society of tradition and intellect to a shallow society praising primitive things such as status and sex, those things don't matter in the grand scheme of things.

if our society keeps this trend of shallowness then its truly over for the human race.

(neubs)

Yeah, so that's why I just stay indoors as much as possible. The more I see, the more it becomes suifuel.

I still like to get some mental images to masturbate to though. That's why I like to pop into restaurants or gas stations just to scope it out and maybe crank one out in the restroom if I see something I like.

(dopesk1)

Don't worry these retarded times will have their tragic crash soon.

The thing that just annoys me no end is how everyone accepts these times thinking that they are a part of something cool, like the trademark of our generation or some shit. Its so retarded.

Show post

Napoleon de Geso (“voluntary incel lolipantsuführer”) #sexist #pedo incels.co

[Based] Man's of culture Tinder bio

Fuck stupid uncultured cunts, not gonna larp as normie, accept me as I am, or fuck off

(just lied about age, too much misandrist ageism everywhere, but even 29 is "too old", considering to lower more)

image

TranscriptAdolf 29
💼lolicon įmonéje Incels.co
🎓Black Pill Academy
Supreme gentleman of culture with refined taste in lolis, searching for cute adorable comrade to stand against this degenerate world of humanimals together
Show post

Some incels #sexist #pedo reddit.com

Re: Imagine having a daughter, whoreing around at 11 years.

image

(Sleepcel)

my boyfriend and I (...)

Of course she's probably le single mother ready to settle down. Like mother, like daughter

(MentalRecluse)
Take note: The child's boyfriend is 13... This is when Chad starts. None of that "you'll meet a girl in college" or "most couples meet at the workplace" or "it's completely normal to be a virgin at 21" bs....

(levi89001)
lol at cuck bf immediately getting mad at the 13 yr old boy.

(CuriousExMuslim)
I really don't know what kind of fuel this is. All I know is that a 13 year old mogs me by 9 points on a 10/10 scale.

(TokiWhoa)
Somwhere a man is paying child support and potentially alimony just to have his ex-wife let his 11 year old daughter get pregnant

Show post

Y-San #pedo forums.animeuknews.net

your forgetting about everyone's favorite pedo Mr. Kimura from azumanga daioh , he was a pedo and funny ( in a weird way).

He's a perfectly normal person when he's not around kids

Pedo's are just people that are funny ( in a weird way)

this shows that pedo's can be normal member's of society as well.

Show post

Some incels #sexist #pedo reddit.com

Re: Welcome to the clown world boys

image

(interruptor-)

Yeah I totally remember using fleshlights when I was 12. My parents got me one for my birthday. Absolutely.

What the fuck is wrong with reddit?

I didn’t even know what sex and masturbation were at 12... wtf is going on...

Bruh most people learn about fapping between the ages of 9-12. There's nothing wrong with rubbing one out lol

This is wrong. I don’t mean it morally speaking, it’s scientifically wrong because you have to hit puberty to actually bust a nut. I grew up in an era where PCs weren’t still mainstreamed, so I wasn’t constantly bombarded with sexual cues.

Nowadays people are constantly pressured with sexual hints and that makes them prematurely develop a sexual desire of sorts. That doesn’t mean it’s fine or normal though.

(jeremyjimmy)

If that was the story, that someone caught their 12 year old son with a fleshlight, reddit would be calling him a creep and calling for therapy because "this isn't a good sign, he sees women as objects".

Someone should wait a few months and post a story saying just that just to see the reactions.

Bruh most people learn about fapping between the ages of 9-12. There's nothing wrong with rubbing one out lol

Yeah, I was doing it around 10 years old. Before that I remember having sexual feelings for certain hot teachers as young as 6 or 7, I had no idea what they were but they were there.

The problem with this story is getting them a sex toy seems off. I guess it depends on the toy? But I said this in another comment, if it was a boy with a fleshlight I think people would be reacting very differently. There's nothing wrong with masturbating but having a big dick in your drawer and losing your virginity to it at age 12 seems odd. Then again maybe it's just a little vibrator but, again, do the old boring "reverse the sexes" and Reddit would be reacting differently.

(ABannedIncel9)

12 years old... these cucks are normalization pedophilia slowley

Pedophilia is a 12 yo having sex with themselves??? Should a 12 yo be jailed for masturbating in the mirror and seeing theit reflection?

This topic may be degeneracy but it is not paedophilia. I am sure when you were 12 and jerked off, that was fine but cuz it's a girl, you feel it's immoral, because you think women's sexuality is more precious?

women can become degenerate much more easily than men.

(Concerned-father2)

Women deserve to be controlled more because it is easier for them to become sluts than it is for men to become sluts.

(hhhh__)

Why why why would you seek parenting advice from people with one overwhelming gender and political bias? These nutcases believe mentally ill men are women for fucks sake.

Ofc all the sensible comments were buried under downvotes.

(FACEandLMS)

imagine if it was a 12 yr old boy shopping for a pocket pussy huh? someone should make a post like that to see what happens

"Um sweaty, a fleshlight will teach your son to disrespect women's bodies from an early age. Don't damage your soyn! Your soyn should be taught to see women as peoole. Buy your soyn a pink dress and the female Ghostbusters on video."

600 Upvotes.

(tatoff)

Given it's reddit I expect people to disagree with the guy and defend the daughter, but holy shit the animosity against the dad for being concerned is pretty shocking.

But hey that's none of my business. The die is cast. You can't change it, you can't stop it.

All we can do is sit back and watch the spectacle that is this burning carnival ride.

Show post

International Communist League (Fourth International) aka the Spartacist League #moonbat #pedo libcom.org

(This apparently originally is from Workers Vanguard No. 843, 4 March 2005. Bolding added by submitter.)

"Recovered memory" prosecutions—which put hundreds behind bars in the daycare and "satanic abuse" witchhunts of the 1980s and early 1990s—are back. In Boston on February 15, 74-year-old defrocked priest, Paul Shanley, was sentenced to 12 to 15 years in prison based solely on uncorroborated "recovered memories" of a man who claimed Shanley abused him 20 years earlier. Alexander Cockburn wrote in CounterPunch (19/20 February): "In the state that gave us Salem in the seventeenth century and the Amiraults (all wrongly sent to prison on charges brought by Middlesex county District Attorney Martha Coakley) in the twentieth, Shanley's case has reintroduced recovered memory to the courtrooms of the twenty-first."

Shanley has been one of the prime whipping boys in the explosive sex scandals that have rocked the Catholic church beginning in 2002, when the Boston Globe began a series on priests and sexual abuse of youth. Roderick MacLeish Jr., the personal injury lawyer representing Shanley's accuser, retailed scandalous tales to the press about Shanley, which have been refuted by JoAnn Wypijewski in CounterPunch. She actually read the 1,600-page official church file on Shanley, which apparently no other reporters bothered to do. As Cockburn pointed out, "Had they done so, they would have found nothing to buttress the claims that Shanley founded NAMBLA [North American Man/Boy Love Association], or was ever a member, or had ever advocated sex between men and little boys, or had a 30-year record of child abuse complaints made against him or a history of being moved from parish to parish. Yet all these allegations have become the common currency of Shanley's biography, and if guards usher a murderer into his cell, the killer will probably have the NAMBLA charge at the top of his mind."

In fact, Paul Shanley did openly advocate recognizing homosexuality as a normal sexual variation (based partly on the pioneering work of Alfred Kinsey), and did have homosexual liaisons. He was a long-haired "street priest" in the 1960s, mentioned in the book Common Ground, who tried to help runaways and kids hooked on drugs. Shanley's "association" with NAMBLA is that he attended a conference of people fighting a Boston anti-gay witchhunt at the end of which some people, not including Shanley, founded a group that later became NAMBLA.

NAMBLA's name is perennially dragged through the plentiful Boston mud, having been pounded for over 20 years by media smears and witchhunting prosecutions. We in the Spartacist League have repeatedly defended this tiny beleaguered group as an elementary act of proletarian decency. We oppose criminalizing their advocacy of the eminently reasonable proposition that youth who have sexual feelings be allowed to express them. NAMBLA simply advocates the decriminalization of consensual sex between men and boys.

It is telling, in this deeply puritanical society, that the pitch of modern inquisitions increases according to the proximity of youth and sex. It is no accident that the church sex scandals have focused overwhelmingly on gay sex (did no priest ever touch a girl?), as this is guaranteed to set reactionary alarm bells ringing a lot louder. Since the daycare witchhunts, the code word for anti-sex crusaders, from the Christian right to the straightlaced morality feminists, has been "protect the children" from so-called pedophiles. This campaign reflects anti-gay bigotry, increased powers of repression for the capitalist state and a shoring up of reactionary "family values" like the domestic slavery of women and stultifying "abstinence only" for young people.

Gerald Amirault, a married man with children of his own, was released from prison in 2004 after being unjustly imprisoned for 18 years, framed up with incredible tales of evil robots, knives and dead pets at the Fells Acres Day School he ran with his sister and mother (who were also imprisoned). This was based solely on the coerced testimony of children whose only real abuse came at the hands of the prosecutors who, in their zeal for convictions and publicity, fed so much crap into them that they still reel from the trauma. Just as Amirault was up for a commutation, the church sex story exploded and he lost another two years to prison, as the cowardly politicians of Massachusetts refused, in the midst of the scandal, to set him free, despite the Board of Pardons' unanimous recommendation. We defended the Amiraults, and many other daycare workers, against the witchhunts of their time.

Now former priest Paul Shanley has been thrown to the wolves of "recovered memory" prosecution. This is a very dangerous thing. No evidence was presented that he committed any crime. This may be a difficult case for some of our readers to grasp, given the passionate—and legitimate—disgust so many feel for the real miseries inflicted by organized religion in this socially backward country, from the Christian fundamentalist right to the Roman Catholic hierarchy. The Catholic church upholds subservience to authority, from children's submission to parents, a wife's submission to her husband, the flock's submission to the priest and submission of all humanity to God. The worst thing, ultimately, about religion is that it preaches blind faith in false, mystical forces ruling our fate, crippling humanity's fight for freedom from oppression and for control over nature.

We care about the suffering of those victimized by corrupt, violent institutions and adults—whether priests or bullying state prosecutors. The terror and helplessness felt by children coerced into submission by frightening authority figures like priests, especially when combined with enforced guilt about sex, does scar them for life. Obviously the church has a lot to cover up—look at the millions in hush money it's been dishing out (including to some of Shanley's accusers). Forced out over the scandal was Boston's arrogant Cardinal Bernard Law, the Catholic version of Harvard's all-purpose bigot Larry Summers (who recently speculated that women, Jews, Catholics and white basketball players are perhaps innately incapable of certain activities). Surely there are many abusive priests. But we'll never know what happened in many cases, as the actual guilt or innocence of those singled out to be demonized is irrelevant to both prosecutors and the church hierarchy, who would rather throw money at accusers than uncover the truth. This too is a terrible injustice to those abused.

The falsity and reactionary political uses of "recovered memory" prosecutions were thoroughly exposed a decade ago. In a major review of research and books debunking "recovered memory" prosecutions, we wrote: "Much of this persecution aims to strengthen the bourgeois state in its regulation of the population and to spread panic, as a diversion from the real brutality of life in this twisted, mean, bigoted, racist society" (Women and Revolution, No. 45, Winter-Spring 1996). What we wrote then is equally true today: It is in the interests of all in the workers movement to protest and oppose this new, deadly "recovered memory" witchhunt. Free Paul Shanley!

Show post

FACEandLMS #sexist #pedo reddit.com

image

Men are attracted to youthful skin and glow, and women before they have digested litres of sperm and become unable to pairbond. Sorry to break it to you femcels. If this news breaks your heart, you have three options:

date a male feminist who thinks women are beautiful no matter what: old, infertile, 300 lbs, etc.
date a decent-looking guy who passed the right milestones at the right time (e.g. he dated 18yos when he was young) and so has moved on from overvaluing youth and fertility in women.
become a lesbian.

Seriously. I am not being hyperbolic. It must be brutal to hear this as a woman. In your mind, you "got better at wearing makeup at 27" compared with you at 18. In your mind, you look better than ever. In men's mind, your youth made you hotter than slapping on warpaint now can achieve. Realize that, to men, you can't protect us, you can't provide insight and logic beyond what we can, you can't build societies, you can't divorce yourself from emotional-thinking. Anything you provide to men, we can get it BETTER from another man except your youth and fertility, physical attractiveness, companionship and sexuality. If you think our biological imperative is wrong, you're free to les it up.

Show post

David J. Stewart #fundie #pedo jesus-is-savior.com

One of Motley Crue's band's shameful members, Vince Neil, killed a man in 1984 while drunk driving. But when a famous rock star murders somebody while drunk, they are given a slap on the wrist. Vince was only sentenced by the judge to 15 days in jail! The Holy Bible teaches an eye for an eye, tooth for death, the death penalty! Vince Neil, and all drunk drivers who murder innocent victims, ought to receive the gas chamber! Ecclesiastes 8:11, “Because sentence against an evil work is not executed speedily, therefore the heart of the sons of men is fully set in them to do evil.” America's legal system is catawampus! The news is filled with people who committed heinous crimes, but were given ridiculously light sentences. Yet, Morton Berger of Arizona, an award-winning public school teacher, is rotting in a state penitentiary for 200 years, for literally downloading 20 indecent images of animals having sex with children. Granted, Morton is a pervert, but does he deserve 200 years behind bars? So how does a murderer often get 1/10th the sentence of a man who downloaded some dirty pictures with his credit card? Truth is stranger than fiction.

What the band Motley Crue and their horrible movie “THE DIRT” fails to convey, is that it is THE MUSIC ITSELF that inspires that immoral, criminal and irresponsible type of behavior. The music is evil, inspired by demons!

Job 20:5, “That the triumphing of the wicked is short, and the joy of the hypocrite but for a moment?” The United States is a wicked place. We have truly earned the shameful titled of being “THE GREAT SATAN!” This sinful temporary world will soon pass away, and all that will matter then is whether you die in the Lord (Revelation 14:13) or die in your sins (John 8:24). 1st John 2:15-17, “Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him. For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world. And the world passeth away, and the lust thereof: but he that doeth the will of God abideth for ever.”

The repulsive deathstyle glamorized by Motley Crue and their fans is shameful, which they readily admit. Albeit, young people today need to be told more, than just that Motley Crue did some bad things; young people need to be warned that vile degenerates like the members of Morley Crue are ungodly people, their music is of the Devil, and they will face the frightening judgment of God in eternity. Hebrews 10:31, “It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God.” I am not condemning anybody, for I am a guilty sinner just like anybody else. My only hope for forgiveness of sins and eternal life, is through faith in Jesus Christ alone and His righteousness. Thank God for the sacrifice of His only begotten Son on the cross of Calvary.

Show post

Pomidor Quixote #sexist #pedo dailystormer.name

[From "High School Whore Gets Two Teachers Jailed by Giving Them Blowjobs, Sues School, Asks for $15,000"]

In the modern world there’s this thing called “sexual abuse” which sometimes means that women are in love with their abusers, willingly eat lunch with them, kiss them, give them blowjobs, get them jailed, and then ask for $15,000 because of all that abuse they endured.

Orlando Sentinel:

A former Ocoee High student who was sexually abused by two teachers at the school when she was 17 years old filed a lawsuit last month accusing Orange County’s school district of negligence, court records show.

The young woman, identified in court records only by initials, filed the suit in Orange County circuit court April 11 and is seeking more than $15,000 in damages. Named as defendants are Orange County Public Schools and the Orange County School Board.

[...]

According to a police report, the girl said she would eat lunch in Kirkpatrick’s classroom and also went there during his planning period, which is when the abuse occurred. They would move to a long table against a wall so no one could see them, she said.

[...]

So she gave some blowjobs and kisses and had lunch with them and whatever. Why should she get $15,000?

Why should the men go to jail?

[...]

The fact that both of those men unknowingly “abused” the same girl suggests that she is the problem, and not them.

What are the chances of two evil predators separately picking the same poor innocent girl as their target?

The girl obviously initiated both relationships.

Come on. Calling what those men did “abuse” is insane. Illegal? Yes, but nowadays legal and illegal are not really indicators of anything but Jewish whims. The goblin invasion of America is legal, because they’re seeking asylum. Having a silly mutual infatuation with a 17-year-old is illegal because uh… it’s somehow bad for the minor. Something about power difference.

Yes, that’s it. The problem is the power dynamic.

[Portrait of Karl Marx]