If gays even try to push some church: Then, I feel that is shameful, on their part. Most often tout this "Live your life...be free!" stuff, yet, then turn around and try to force other people to agree with and accept their ways. If that's their mindset, than why don't they just stand back, and let other people "live their lives and be free." Very hypocritical.
36 comments
The problem is that your "freedom" tends to encroach on their freedom. Quite deliberately, I might add. If you let them have what they want, it will be at absolutely no cost to you, I assure you.
On one hand I agree, homosexuals have no right to force churches to marry them if they believe it's wrong because free religion and shit, but gay people aren't. In fact the gay agenda is pretty simple: they want to live their lives and be free.
From Dictionary.com
Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1) - Cite This Source - Share This
hyp·o·crite Audio Help /'h?p?kr?t/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[hip-uh-krit] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
noun
1. a person who pretends to have virtues, moral or religious beliefs, principles, etc., that he or she does not actually possess, esp. a person whose actions belie stated beliefs.
2. a person who feigns some desirable or publicly approved attitude, esp. one whose private life, opinions, or statements belie his or her public statements.
[Origin: 11751225; ME ipocrite < OF < LL hypocrita < Gk hypokrits a stage actor, hence one who pretends to be what he is not, equiv. to hypokr(nesthai) (see hypocrisy) + -tés agent suffix]
Related forms
hyp·o·crit·i·cal, adjective
hyp·o·crit·i·cal·ly, adverb
Synonyms deceiver, dissembler, pretender, pharisee.
Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1)
Based on the Random House Unabridged Dictionary, © Random House, Inc. 2006.
Generally the fruits only stick their noses in when other people, in the course of living their lives and being free, do things like beat gay people to death for being gay. Or when about 1/3 of the states here have laws making it legal to fire homosexuals purely on the basis of their homosexuality.
Explain to me why you have to be able to agree with a position before you'll stand up and defend a person's right to have it.
"turn around and try to force other people to agree with and accept their ways"
"Very hypocritical."
Round and Round
What goes around, comes around.
I'll tell ya why!
I've never met a gay person who tried to force me to become gay. I've met many that would be happy for tolerance; why is that unreasonable? No one says you have to be gay to accept those who are.
Fundies, on the other hand, practically pee their pants trying to force me to believe the way they do.
I'd rather live in a world full of homosexuals than fundies.
Ah, so they're forcing you to be gay. Well, I agree, that's intolerant and hypocritical, not to mention stupid and presumably illegal. What's that? You still get to be straight? Then what the hell are you on about?!?!
'Most often tout this "Live your life...be free!" stuff, yet, then turn around and try to force other people to agree with and accept their ways.'
Like most fundies, Refined ignores the fact that he & his fellow fundies are trying to force people to agree with & accept THEIR ways - by legislation. Fundies don't believe gays should be allowed to 'live their lives & be free'; they want them to remain celibate, placed in internment camps, or worst of all - executed. The real hypocrites here are RefinedbyFire & his fellow fundies.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.