NASA has been studying the Gouse of Enargy on and around the earth. It is decreasing in enargy, that mean years before it is increasing in enargy. every 1400 years we loose 1/2 our enargy. Life can not live in over 7000 gouse of enargy. That means the Time fram when they say men was evolving from ape to man, could not have been. due to the FACT! that the enargy would be so high past 7000 no life from could live. THAT 7000yrs ago nothing could have lived. WOW the Bible time fram shows that GOD created the earth about 6000yrs ago. when the Conditions where perfact for Life to exsit. The idea of Evolution is nothing but Darwins theroy (thought) which with todays modern science is proving WRONG!. Even the worlds smartest person SAID that he believe in a creator (Alber Einstein).
39 comments
I... umm... that is...
All right, in spite of his misspellings, I know what he meant by "enargy", "loose", "fram", "perfact", "exsit", "theroy", and "Alber". But, WHAT THE FUCK IS A GOUSE?!? The closest word I can think of is "gauss", but that's a unit of magnetic induction, not energy.
Hmmm... I guess, by his made up calculations of the rate of decay, the magnetic field would have hit 7000 gauss about 7000 years ago... but there's just one problem. The earth's magnetic field doesn't simply decay. In fact, as can easily be observed by looking at the orientations of paramagnetic minerals, the Earth's magnetic field inverts every... oh, few hundred thousand years or so, iirc.
ETA: I'm not even going to go into his claim about Einstein. I could pull up some of the actual quotes by Einstein, but, well, who cares? Sure, Einstein was a smart guy. But an argument from authority is a logical fallacy. Besides, I'll leave some entertainment for other posters who want to laugh about what Einstein REALLY thought about gods like the one in the bible.
<<Life can not live in over 7000 gouse of enargy.>>
If he means gauss, the earth's magnetic field is at about 0.5, so how the fuck does he extrapolate to 7000?
0.5 -> 1 (1400 years ago)
1 -> 2 (2800 years ago)
2 -> 4 (4200 years ago)
4 -> 8 (5600 years ago)
8 ->16 (7000 years ago)
Jeremy, maybe he took the value in gauss, then converted from teslas to gauss... 5 times in all?
0.5*10.4= 5.2
7000/1400 = 5
5.2 * 10^3 = 5849
5.2 * 10.4^4 = 60832
I had to spend some time trying to figure how he might have come up with such a figure, and it's pretty convoluted. I figured my guess of how he did it out by trying all the common calculator mistakes I can think of. By my estimation of his logic, it would have hit 7000 gauss about 7000 - 8000 years ago.
Of course, I could be mistaken, and he's just completely insane, rather than merely unable to spell, know what he's talking about, or use a calculator. Your guess is as good as mine on that.
Well, it's good to have the learned Head Latrine Orderly at Bumpkins R Us weigh-in with his opinion.
This may hold a record for the fewest letters between errors.
If he is talking about Gausse, I think energy measured at 7000 Gausse is equal to 7 thousand millionths of a volt. Can't live when exposed to that?
All your base are belong to us! Evolutionist's are on the way to destruction. Theories for Evolution have no chance to survive make your time!
No really, this quote looks like it's been run through a really crappy translator and back. As for "Gouse," I'm stumped. This entire post is nonsense. Let's see if I can make anything of it using my employee's benefits: Free use of the Acme Translator!
Machine translations are imperfect. Single-tired-person translations may also be flawed. All translations are contingent upon the original passage making sense. Fundiebabble-to-English translator now engaged.
BOOOM!
Oops. I guess this was too much for it. It exploded. Sorry, Acme Translator.
I'm reasonably sure he's using ye olde creationist argument #133: the Earth's magnetic field is decaying (see here for response: http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CD/CD701.html ). If this is the case, apparently Gouse = gauss.
Anyway, my favorite bit is how energy is not only misspelled, but _consistently_ misspelled throughout the post. I suspect that Mr. Keys!! may just be trying to make creationists look bad for this reason. However, I should note that I have had a hard time telling the difference between creationists and parodies ever since my local paper started running creationist letters.
Kyle -- you've just independently discovered Poe's Law!
(Without the use of a dead giveaway, like a winking smiley at the end of the post, it is impossible to tell a sincere creationist from a parody.)
1) Assuming, for the moment, that "Gouse" means "Gauss" (I don't think there's anything else it could be), the magnetic field of Earth is far more complex than you think. For one, the poles flip every so often (on the order of hundreds of millenia) second, there is not just a dipole component (which is the part that's decaying), but also a quadrupole component of the magnetic field that is actually *increasing* at about the same rate as the dipole component is decreasing (making the actual decay far slower) third, the Earth's magnetic field is nowhere near the 220 gauss it would need to be at for the decay rate you give to produce a 7000 G field 7000 years ago; fourth, there's no way of knowing whether the decay rate is constant or not without a better understanding of the geodynamo (which we lack at this time), so backward extrapolation is unjustified at this point.
2) "Theory" does not mean "wild guess". A scientist use the word "theory" to describe a hypothesis that has been very well tested and is pretty much as close to fact as science is willing to proclaim anything (nothing is beyond the possibility of being proven wrong in science; theories just fit the data so well that we don't expect anything more than minor modifications to them).
3) As far as I know, Einstein does NOT have the highest recorded IQ, for whatever that's worth. He is certainly one of the greatest physicists ever, but quite possibly not the world's smartest person. Even if he were, your argument is naught but an appeal to authority (and moreover, not in his area of expertise) - and unless I misremember, he was not particularly fond of Christianity.
"Fewest Letters Between Errors" Award is certainly justified.
What? Now NASA says the world is 6000 years old, well I can't argue with that sort of science.
You know its got to be true to, I mean, look at the terms, like 'Gousse' and random numbers, like 7000.
To top it all off, some guy called Alber Einstein believes in god.
Anwyay, Albert Einstein is not the world smartest person... He's dead. And I don't remember him saying he believed in god either.
Einstein believed, not so much in the possibility of a Deistic creator, but more so that the universe and nature was the ultimate testimony and reality was God, not God was a reality!
"That deep emotional conviction of the presence of a superior reasoning power, which is revealed in the incomprehensible universe, forms my idea of God."
He also said:
If people are good only because they fear punishment, and hope for reward, then we are a sorry lot indeed.
I cannot imagine a God who rewards and punishes the objects of his creation and is but a reflection of human frailty
As far as I'm concerned, I prefer silent vice to ostentatious virtue.
Do you believe in immortality?
No, and one life is enough for me.
He who joyfully marches in rank and file has already earned my contempt. He has been given a large brain by mistake, since for him the spinal cord would suffice.
I do not believe in the God of theology who rewards good and punishes evil.
Despite the scientific sounding (or at least, trying to sound scientific), this kind of read like the bible. This is the type of thing they teach in sunday school. Incoherent pseudo-scientific babble, because, if they want to prove their god right, they have to prove science wrong, and that is a pretty tall order. I'm convinced, that if their bible said the grass was blue and cats grew on trees, they would believe it, contrary to all scientific, reasonable, and common sense logic. Oh well, I guess we can't all be morons.
And by the way, if you're refering to ALBERT Einstein, he never said he believed in a creator. He said he believed in the 'god of Spinoza'. For those who don't know (particularly christian fundies), Spinoza was the one who put forward the idea of pantheism, which is actually found in many of the world's religions, minus christianity and islam. Einstein also said that he thought Buddhism was a pretty decent religion, but as far as a transcendent, personal creator god like christianity has, he completely rejected the idea.
Science woo.
Humanity abandoned the idea that there is a 'life energy' a few hundred years ago.
You completely misspelled 'Gauss' and failed to recognize what it means.
In fact, I want to see your link to the 'NASA study' you refer to.
In conclusion, I will use you as proof that we are well on the way to an idiocracy.
"Gouse(sic)"
We need to talk.
A little something from Einstein himself:
[...] The word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honourable, but still primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish. No interpretation no matter how subtle can (for me) change this. These [...] interpretations are highly manifold according to their nature and have almost nothing to do with the original text. For me the Jewish religion like all other religions is an incarnation of the most childish superstitions. And the Jewish people to whom I gladly belong and with whose mentality I have a deep affinity have no different quality for me than all other people. As far as my experience goes, they are also no better than other human groups, although they are protected from the worst cancers by a lack of power. Otherwise I cannot see anything 'chosen' about them.
the Gouse of Enargy
image
THE GOOSE!
Does this 'Enargy' come from the 3 AA size batteries: with a bot included to put them in?! It's Latest Technology? It's Special Style? It's Eggy Goodness & Neck Fat? Or perhaps it's Bum Flap? Bloody wars, this is lethal! You know the only thing to counter it:
image
The Kith Quiver of Space Gun. [/Dr. Stuart Ashen] image
...or the Gouse Cannon from "DOOM IV": which fires Eggy Goodness from THE GOOSE! to defeat the Fram: which you don't know what it's supposed to be, but you wouldn't want one swimming up your arse!
But I'll tell you what the Gouse actually is: a Cre(a)ti(o)nist Worrying Machine; and a very efficient one too, we'd imagine.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.