Quote:
You would think that even Rosie O'Donnell could grasp that there is indeed a difference between "radical Christianity" and "radical Islam."

I'm not so sure she doesn't. The thing is that Rosie loathes Christianity because it does not sanction her 'alternative lifestyle.'

I know, I know. Neither does radical Islam. True. But let's face it, even if Islam wins, the western world will not become Islamist overnight. It does not work that way. And liberals know it. It's sort of "After me, the deluge," as the Sun King said.

Liberals do not see radical Islam as an immediate threat. But Christianity IS a threat to them because it condemns abortion, homosexuality, bestiality (seeing as how it's becoming an expected trend; go to the Europeans and Barnyard Sex thread, in this same forum), etc. Christianity condemns "If it feels good, do it." And that's liberals' gospel.

That's why liberals consider Christianity an immediate threat. And they compare it to radical Islam because they want people to fear it as they fear the Sharia law. Liberals are bent on erradicating Christianity. They think that they will eventually be able to do the same thing with Islam.

They certainly have another thought coming, but as we all know, liberals never learn.