frogfryer #conspiracy

frogfryer #conspiracy fuckfrance2.com

It wasn't the illuminati banksters it was the chinks ya mental cases .

We were doing threads on ff1 about the chinks and Koreans building to many gooddanm boats

I can yell ya what some container freight costs off the top of my head from shanghai especially
To a bunch of different cities from Newark to peru. Ball parkFrom shanghai to Newark I can ship a full 40 ft container for around $ 3750.00.Form shanghai to puerto quetzal for less tan 2300.00 .From shanghai to el callao less than 2800.00

8 comments

old comment by

It depends on which one you speak to.
Just like the average person a conspiracy theorist may be smart, stupid, tall small old, young, focused or unfocused. They may have formal training in a field and they may not. The only thing I've found consistent with all conspiracy theorists is that they all come from the same standpoint: they feel like they've been duped by an authority figure and now they want to find out why.
Of the ones who publish books and have careers - unlike the armchair theorist - there are many who specialize in a very tiny area of thought. Joseph P. Farrell comes to mind. I think he over-extends himself a lot, but I understand where he's coming from and he spins a good yarn. And his yarn is highly limited to an examination of post-World War 2 America and Europe.
Then there are the generalists who simply look into as many patterns as possible. These people pick up, in my opinion, the most interesting patterns. A lot of people get caught up in this concept of a monolithic entity that singularly controls everything. Which is demonstrably idiotic. However, there are [competing] groups that really do wish to control as much as possible. Any reading of even a normal newspaper will confirm this. With the generalist they tend to seek patterns across multiple fields and see what fits. I like this angle because the tendency of an assembly of a more coherent picture that one can apply to world events. James Corbett is my favorite generalist. He's extremely well researched and emotionally grounded in a way that makes him very easy to listen to.
There are many charlatans and sadly they're the loudest and get the most attention. If you're interested at all I'd say look into James Corbett. He's a generalist and that's my personal favorite type of thinking in general. Specialists always end up in an intellectually myopic hole. The goal should be greater and more coherent understanding that can be relayed to others who are just as confused as you recently were.
That's a bit of a wall of text. Sorry.
This has been on my mind for a while and I couldn't help typing all of this.

frogfryer #conspiracy fuckfrance2.com

8 comments

Confused?