image
26 comments
@Indicible
I never heard of that fetish (though according to rule 34, I shouldn't be surprised). That explains soooooo much, TBH.
---
Still, why do fundies keep portraying Satan/Shaytan as the good guy? I mean, if god makes a woman beautiful, why aren't people allowed to enjoy that beauty like one enjoys a work of art? It's like saying that the Mona Lisa should always be covered by a veil, even to her painter. That kinda ignores the point of it...
No, if good ol' morningstar is the guy to go to to actually enjoy the pleasures life has to offer, sign me up. I mean, there's a reason the trope "Horny Devils" exists...
P.S.: Not trying to objectify women at all, I'd say the same thing about men. And come on, everybody enjoys seeing something aesthetically pleasing.
I'd have to stop at 3, but without the attitude. There's no way I'd want to wear stifling head coverings on a hot day. A sane and sensible dress code would be for people to wear whatever is appropriate for the weather and for the activities they do. In other words.....people should decide for themselves.
@ Timjer & SpukiKitty
It is a subgroup of fetishists.
You can check this guy for a SFW sample.
Islamic clothing can also be used to conceal kinky implements and undercover bondage.
I expect some fundies' minds would be blown upon hearing this.
Going from most - covered to least, why stop at "1"? Shouldn't there be a level where she is wearing underwear, then skimpy underwear, then nothing?
Maybe he stopped at "1" because his eyeballs melted.
@ Don
Going from most - covered to least, why stop at "1"? Shouldn't there be a level where she is wearing underwear, then skimpy underwear, then nothing?
Push up bra, fishnets, stiletto heels...
I believe I'd go for about a minus 10 - even if she's a 4.
Good, I would like my teacher to have as much fun as possible. On the other hand denying the godbeast any sort of niceties is definitely my very own pleasure.
@SpukiKitty
These dipshits simply hate quality control since they know they are defective and would never pass without a fuckload of improvement. I on the other hand embrace it and the challenge it offers. They want to beg their way into afterlife while if one ever existed I would refuse to enter it without first earning my place through my deeds and empathy(and if these things don`t count there, then why the fuck would I wanna be there anyway).
@ Nomen Nescio about NSFW veiling fetish
Well, yes, I know of a Flickr page that was dedicated to a woman who loved wearing burkas made of latex. I also know of a few websites with stories and picture manipulations of veiling crossed with BDSM.
And the sheer amount of "hijab porn" is rather surprising. I am not even going into the total enclosure crowd, who seem to have made it their goal in life to make genitals available despite wearing a surprising amount of clothing/fabric/fetish gear/bondage gear.
Actually I find this whole thing amusing and a proof of hope for the human race: Rule 34 is the absolute proof of human creativity. Now, if we could turn our energies from killing each other to devising elaborate lovemaking, we would have a great many less problems...
So where does Ryuuko fall on this list?
image
@Mister Spak
0 is underwear, -1 is naked, -2 is flayed alive.
There isn't even a hint of cleavage here, so where does 'absolutely fucking naked' fall on this scale? Is it like magnitude in astronomy? The less clothing a person is wearing, the deeper into the negatives the value is?
image
Looks like we need to develop an astronomical lewdness scale.
image
Her hair is fully covered.
image
Not seeing anything about ultra-high heels being 'Haram'.
If Islamic clothing for women has become fetishised, you've got nobody else to blame but yourselves .
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.