Erm, what? This dude has no idea what he's talking about. When it comes to 2D:4D ratio (What the linked study talks about, high 2D:4D ratio indicates low rates of prenatal testosterone, low ratio indicate high levels and, at least according to this study, higher levels of agreeableness with women, what our friend here calls "cuckness".) whites have consistently been shown to have some of the highest ratios, with Germanics having some of the very highest on average if I'm not mistaken. If anything, they should be considered some of the least cucked people on Earth according to this guy's logic.
Literally just a few seconds' worth of Googling would have shown this dude he's wrong, yet he instead chose to spend minutes talking out of his ass. Amazing.
This is pretty funny to me though. I was kinda into research into this topic a few months ago, reading damn near anything I could find about it, and I remember one researcher (Just spent half an hour searching for his work, can't find it unfortunately, would've loved to link to it.), who wrote entire books about everything 2D:4D ratios can "tell us about ourselves", and one of his theories was that the high average digit ratio of Europeans is the reason why feminism had taken such a strong root in those countries, as, it indicating low levels of exposure to testosterone in the womb, meant European men were much more "feminized" than others and thus, according to him, much more empathetic towards women than other groups who, according to him, were pretty much bombarded with testosterone into being ultra-violent (As he made sure to talk about the fact that there are studies of various quality linking low digit ratios to psychopathy, criminality, aggressiveness, propensity to cheat and, because the researchers behind those studies were apparently trying to cover all the bases when it came to racist stereotypes, longer penises and athleticness) misogynistic bastards.
All of that ignoring the fact that Middle Easterners (Whose countries, no disrespect meant to any people from the region reading this, tend to be rather far from the feminist ideal.), tend to have similarly high digit ratios to Europeans.
And then comes this study which pretty much obliterates that guy's entire theory, finding that, if anything, it's the "violent" non-Europeans who should have a propensity towards feminism and protecting and helping women.
Kinda funny to me, to be honest.
