RE: The American Renaissance Guide to Women, Sex, and Family
Male prefer pretty, young, curvacious, loyal, kind and supportive women.
Women prefer tall, handsome, low body fat, hardworking, kind, ambitious men with resources.
No amount of leftist propaganda is going to change that reality. In general, people are sympathic to the mate preferences of their gender and hostile to the mate preferences of the opposite gender. The exception of course being people that highly embody those preferences. Instead of complaining about those preferences people would be more happy if they tried to get as close to those preferences as possible.
High IQ leftists in the 1960s had their fun, avoided pregnancy, and eventually got married. Pushing this ethos on the rest of the population caused problems for low IQ people who are not able to successfully employ contraception.
That is tragic, but we cannot, and should not return to pre 1960s puritanical views about sex. Instead family planning needs to be cognitively tailored to the woman in question. Smart girls get the pill, dumb girls get the implant. But that will not be accepted by leftists.
Perhaps they would be able to accept a more universal solution. Every girl should get the contraceptive arm implant when she turns 12, and it should be replaced when necessary until she consciously decides that she wants children, preferably within the confines of marriage.
So the right wing religious puritans are wrong, and the leftists that think that low IQ people can practice contraception are also wrong. (Again)
That is a terrible idea. The pill is not this harmless wonder drug that stops you from getting pregnant. It can actually mess up your hormones so bad, that it can make you infertile. So much for deciding to have children later. Even worse, those hormones get flushed down the toilet and never get filtered back out of our water supply (either because they can't or it's too expensive to do so).
I see people using "Puritan" as a way to describe prudes, but this is completely wrong. Their name has nothing to do with their sexual proclivities, but their interpretation of the Bible. Puritans were all about having sex, as much as both parties want. The only stipulation is that you have to be married first.
There is a cost for everything.
A very, tiny percentage of girls who receive Gardasil die, but we still do it because more women would die of cervical cancer if we did not.
Also I invite you to ponder all the misery that single motherhood contributes to.
It's called "gain some morals and don't have sex until marriage". Wow, single motherhood solved. Leftists furious.
This is why your side is immoral.
This is why you lose.
This is why you deserve to lose.
”Every girl should get the contraceptive arm implant when she turns 12”
But teaching girls to have higher standards for themselves and wait until marriage is puritanical and wrong?
You must understand. The desert dwelling tribesmen that made up those laws were getting married right at the onset of puberty that is why they made sense at that time.