"The interesting thing was nearly every so called scholar had a PHD. I guess you CAN be overeducated and wrong."
And what qualifications do you have to make you think you have the right to say that? To be able to have even an opinion*, and have the remotest hope in hell of being able to contradict what these learned people know - and thus are able to say what they do - would mean that you would have to go to grade school, high school, college, then Oxford and/or or Cambridge university(ies), and study in one of their Philosophical & Theological facilities, studying any & all texts in Latin, Greek, Aramaic etc, writing theses and so on, to gain the necessary degrees, nay, professorships, in this particular field of study.
But then, you'd be able to know exactly what they were talking about, and you'd no longer be the ignorant, uneducated wingnut fundie you are now.
Thus you would then agree with them. Oh wait...
Catch-22 can be such a bitch, can she not?
Now you know why the likes of Pat Robertson daren't argue the toss with Richard Dawkins at the Oxford/Cambridge Debating Societies - and have such broadcast on worldwide TV.
I think we know who'd come out of such the utter failure he is eh, little Raptard?!
>:D
*- @anonymous_troy
"You can also be an idiot and wrong."
And as demonstrated by Mulligan here, those with opinions can be wrong too. And everything Ruptured Retards says, does, and thinks is completely...:
image
And that's not an opinion, RR. It's fact.