Annoying bitch #fundie thephora.net
For women to be racialist or nationalistic is an anomaly. Women will engage with whichever man can provide for them the best lifestyle. This is best displayed during wartime, women of occupied countries will freely give themselves to occupying armies in exchange for food, status and protection. Men are more intellectual and guided by high-minded ideals like patriotism, while women are interested mainly in survival. This is why women are historically "oppressed" in some societies. Mongol, Hun, and Moorish armies probably did not get much resistance from European women, in fact they probably had to fight them off with a stick.
The West has become overintellectualized and has invented all these concepts (feminism, monogamy, human rights, "love marriages") to avoid uncomfortable aspects of basic human nature and none of them work because they obviously conflict with one another (i.e. how do you fall in love and stay monogamous with a feminist?).
The less intellectualized cultures on earth know all about this, which is why they place a lot of restrictions on their own women and their behavior, while at the same time engaging in the practice of concubinage (mostly of conquered or lower caste women). Another good example of this is Islamic immigrants in Europe, who guard the chastity of their own womenfolk while taking advantage of the whoredom of the white girls they feel they are conquering. This is the natural order of things. Human females similar to other primates are biologically evolved to be sluts who can take sex from multiple males in the same day. This is something Eastern cultures are well aware of and go to great lengths to both protect their own females from while at the same time take advantage of it. The Bible has a lot of the same thinking.