Sorry but most men cannot get laid like an average woman can. You're probably talking about a very small percentage of males who are successful sleeping around with women.
8 comments
The number of single mothers tells a different story.
As does condom sales.
Also the various groups that figure birth control is a right.
The briefest survey of abortion clinics.
Divorce lawyers would like a word with you, as would the detectives that work for them.
Paparazzi.
I imagine a conversation with any night-shift check-in clerk at any motel in the land would be instructive.
To reiterate what <@KeithInc. > said, if that was so why did the Hull-based pharmaceutical company Reckitt Benckiser buy the already hugely profitable contraceptives manufacturer Durex…?!
The clue’s in the question, LosT (IQ)5.4730890.
<@KeithInc. > #166441
The number of single mothers tells a different story.
I think these assholes really believe (or at least they really, really want to) that a tiny number of ‘Chads’ and ‘Tyrones’ and whatever tf they call any other ones are the ones impregnating all women including single moms, married women, etc. Which would actually make our genetic diversity smaller than most endangered species. But incels aren’t exactly known for their cogitative abilities, and realizing that would require them to think about what they say.
@Stupiditykillsbrains #166475
No, no, not a double standard, it’s science. There’s that theory that a fetus imparts its genetic code to the mother, meaning all babies have dna of the father, the mother, and every previous pregnancy.
And the even LESS scientifically literate then see this as evidence the woman retains the DNA of every sex act, so she doesn’t even have to get pregnant, just get laid.
So no matter how many times men fuck, they’re ‘pure,’ but women have ‘cooties.’
<@KeithInc. > #166481
Technically, what happens is that stem cells from the placenta get incidentally transferred to the mother’s body. It’s “sharing DNA” in the same sense that an organ transplant “shares DNA”. There was this bizarre idea that this “permanent DNA imprint” is essentially a mark of ownership, which lead to the idea of it causing a “permanent emotional imprint” (that’s called a relationship, doofus). Which further lead to the even stupider ideas that just having sex leaves a permanent emotional imprint, because the DNA in sperm, therefore a women who has casual sex with men gets permanently emotionally broken from too many imprints. Also lesbians can’t love because they can’t do sperm imprints, and gay men can’t love for long because every gay man is promiscuous.
Sometimes I think NHAW (Not How Anything Works) needs to be a recognized abbreviation.
Eh, the first part is sorta true, just because a lot of dudes are willing to stick it in anybody. But that doesn't mean most women are OK with it, or translate to a tiny privileged caste of uber-sex men.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.