Slavery Advocate #elitist slaveryadvocate.com
[From "Thoughts on Familial Separation Within Slavery"]
One of the most frequent, and longest enduring, critiques of slavery, encapsulating all variants, is the forced dissolution of bonds of kinship through sale, labor allocation, or selective forced emancipation. The separation of youths from their parents, brothers and sisters, or relatives more generally seems to inspire a degree of emotional anguish on an instinctual level, this does not come from a thorough analysis
Slavery is a form of government, by far the oldest form of government, and within any form of governance there will be appropriate and inappropriate pressures that will be put upon those who are governed
Within civilization, a slave will be, and should be, the being whose qualities imply necessary subordination for normative functions[…]These characteristics could be laziness, decadence, physical or mental inability, or a general incompatibility with the sensibilities of the population one lives within. A master should be one who is of noted and consistent benefit to the society in which he lives[…]Should the masters’ word not have supremacy over the slave?
If we perceive this to be the case, and a master fails in his guidance of his slaves through an unjust and irresponsible familial separation, or in any other noteworthy respect, then it is not the failure of slavery, it is only incidentally the failure of the master[…]If, however, it is determined this familial separation was ultimately appropriate[…]the master did a service to his former property where said property is now bound to seek more constructive opportunities
The role of a family[…]is to act as a cornerstone of society[…]represent those who are established to be of the very tissue of the societal structure[…]The role of the slave is divergent[…]he does not need to be granted the same type of upbringing or affiliations