Sorry, but there is nothing wrong with raping an unwed non-virgin woman, other than the fact that it is illegal.
8 comments
The fact that it is very, VERY wrong, is what’s making it illegal, nincompoop.
Her marriage status is of no importance whatsoever. The RAPIST is the criminal; it’s what HE (or more rarely SHE) has done that is of importance.
Besides, how the heck would the rapist know whether the woman is a virgin or not? There is no way of determining whether someone (woman OR man) is a virgin. The only way is to ask the person, and they could lie if it suits them, or if it’s dangerous to tell the truth.
If that could keep you from being raped, EVERYONE would say they are virgins. But it won’t, as some creeps would relish raping a virgin. With some potential rapists, it would be better to say that one is NOT a virgin, as that would deter THEM from raping a USED WOMAN. But, there’s also no way of determining which type your potential rapist is, beforehand.
"There's nothing wrong with killing all incels, other than it's a illegal"
See? I too can be an idiot.
Rephrase that: there is nothing wrong with a bit of consent, whether the woman is a virgin, unmarried or none of the above. Oh but nobody, even a junkie whore, would consent to a thing like you, SOB.
This sounds like not only a particularly extreme form of slut-shaming, it also sounds like (possibly accidentally, possibly deliberately) an extreme form of divorce-shaming. That’s on top of the usual entitlement and lack of empathy.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.