So, do we need any more proof that trans activism is really conservative in nature, or is having Donald fucking rich asshole agree with them enough to convince everyone? Because seriously, if Some rich asshole is on your side, you’re almost definitely not on the right one.
(Relatedly, anyone else find it completely fucking disgusting that everyone continues to boil the North Carolina law down to “WAAH they won’t let men in the women’s bathrooms!!!” when the law also literally made it legal in North Carolina to discriminate against gay and lesbian people on the basis of sexuality? But I guess who honestly gives a fuck about gays and lesbians, there are men in dresses whose feelings might be hurt!!! PRIORITIES!!)
25 comments
as much as Donald is fucking rich asshole, you can't demonize any cause he support with guilt by association.
you can also fight more than one civil rights battle at a time. no need for inner fighting in the LGBT movement.
btw, by your on logic trans activism can't be conservative in nature, because Ted fucking asshole Cruz support the North Carolina law.
Please deactivate any stupid word replacement plugin or at least re-replace it when submitting. Thank you.
Also, you should not assign too much significance to Trump's opinions. He is a shameless liar, and it would surprise me if he actually believes half the things he screams.
I agree, it's a bad law all the way around. Which is why I think it should be repealed on the basis of being unconstitutional. Arguing that transsexuals are getting the spotlight instead of gays & lesbians is not helping anyone, neither is calling them "men in dresses."
Probably because that's the most ridiculous application with which they rallied support for the law and for which the law is now being used. There's also been plenty of discussion of the broader problems with this law and has been for quite some time, you oblivious little dolt. I xwishyouwould spend 30 seconds reading something other than your fellow idiots' equally moronic tumblr posts for news.
Accidentally agreeing with someone you despise, on one issue, does not mean the issue is wrong, or all anti-choice-people have to change their stance as Hitler was anti-abortion. (Deliberate Godwin, to show the stupidity of the "argument".)
We boil the stupid law down to "Waaah, they won't let women in the women's bathroom". The law is even more stupid for discriminating against sexual orientation as well as sexual identity. We just point out the most stupid thing about it, by the boil-down thing.
"Sugar is bad for you, sugar will rot your teeth out, Donald Trump eats sugar."
This kind of post is why I came to this site, pure, unadulterated, logical fallacy, a truly darnedest thing.
"But I guess who honestly gives a fuck about gays and lesbians,"
You seem to have your fucking panties in a fucking twist over them.
"Because seriously, if Some rich asshole is on your side, you’re almost definitely not on the right one"
Find me a side WITHOUT a rich asshole on it. Please. I'll wait.
Priorities indeed...
Iam a Transgendered I look nothing like a man but I must be degraded in North Carolina because I wear womens' cloths, oh by the way I might be wearing pants like any normal woman!
I look very strange and uncomfortable walking into the male toilets having boobs on my chest.
Could somebody please come up with photos of Republican candidates attending shows featuring trans and drag performers? I know they exist, with the possible exception of Ted Cruz, who probably opted to attend a mayonnaise, jello, and creamed corn buffet instead of seeing a fabulous revue.
So, do we need any more proof that trans activism is really conservative in nature, or is having Donald fucking rich asshole agree with them enough to convince everyone?
Well, that particular 'fucking rich asshole' has since changed his mind and said that this issue is down to the states to sort out, so he now doesn't agree with them.
"Donald fucking rich asshole agree with them"
Well, if it gets less right-wingers voting for Donald Fart, then I hope that little factoid goes viral .
Who honestly gives a fuck for a retard who thinks he's still hirsute? Wiggy: the trichological equivalent of what you're going on about, yiwishyouwouldfuckoff
At least Patrick Stewart & Bruce Willis admitted they were losing their hair, and went all the way. Telly Savalas had hair, but was bald of his own free will.
Also, Persis Khambatta in the first "Star Trek" film. Sigourney Weaver in "Alien III". NEXT!
One conservative“ politician goes against the conservative majority and doesn’t compare transgendered people to pedophile predators and therefore “trans activism” is somehow a conservative movement?
You’re not very good at that whole logic thing, are you?
So, if someone rich supports your cause, it's the wrong cause?
That means that literally every cause is "not the right one." Rich people love to support causes they agree with, and not all of those people are conservative.
But I don't really expect critical thinking from a TERF. You lot are the sole reason for the negative stereotypes about lesbians.
Also, Trump was once considered very much a Democrat. He's not exactly consistent.
"So, do we need any more proof that trans activism is really conservative in nature"
...but only if you're Megatron!
image
Ai thenk yaw! X3
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.