Something you wrote in an earlier post jumped out at me, "friend:"
When you compare Hinduism to Christianity, you know Hinduism is unrighteous, because it says you can come back as a chicken if you are too sinful, but that you always get another chance in never ending cycles. This does not deal with sin righteously if you always get another chance. I don't see how Hinduism is less "righteous" than Christianity because of their beliefs of life after death. There's still punishment for misdeeds in Hinduism, it simply works differently. Moreover, even if it is unrighteous, that desn't make it less valid as a religion. It really is all the same mythology about punishment and reward for behavior.
Moreover, the exponential progression of conscience does not allow for it. You get one chance this life to be conditionally elected by God. Actually, it probably would. As souls become reincarnated, their behavior would most likely be more moral and just, as they would seek a better life the next time around. Thus, there would be an "exponential growth of human conscience" as time went on, and people went through more and more lives. Compare that to Christianity: you only get one life, and as long as you believe in that Jesus dude, you'll go to heaven afterwards. No matter how much you screw up, you still get eternal salvation if you ask for forgiveness. Now that philosphy would probably lead to either a decline in "global conscience," or no change at all over time. Which is pretty much what we have. Yes, yes, child sacrifices are way down, but there is significantly more gun violence now than there was 6000 years ago.
So you see? Hinduism fits your "proof" much better than christianity. I'd get rid of the third step and seriously start thinking about converting.
