Istvan #fundie

Istvan #fundie cseblogs.com

To do research, creationists need funds. But all the funds go to those who believe in Evolutionism, the carefully protected, useless and and literally baseless religion. Yes, baseless, because you remember how it all “started”? Nothing exploded. And nothing “really means nothing”. No time, no space, no matter, no natural laws. Yeah, right. When SOMETHING explodes that SOMETHING is destroyed, and its environment also gets damaged. But that is nothing compared to what happens, when ABSOLUTE NOTHING explodes! When NOTHING (NO TIME, NO SPACE, NO MATTER, NO NATURAL LAWS) explodes, an incredibly complex universe forms itself. Of course. Easy as pie. The greatest mystery of all time, the origin of the universe is now solved, and all is well with the world. And where is the evidence? Anyone got a sample of ABSOLUTE NOTHING? Can I put it under a microscope? Because I sure am interested in what is in NOTHING!

42 comments

old comment by JasoNF

"Anyone got a sample of ABSOLUTE NOTHING? Can I put it under a microscope? Because I sure am interested in what is in NOTHING!"

Actually, "nothing" really is interesting, and doesn't appear to be nothing at all, but rather pairs of particles and antiparticles being created and destroying eachother. There's also something called Zero Point Energy that is very interesting. What you need to understand, Istvan, is that our concept of "nothing" bears very little semblence to what nothing actually is, and so too our concepts of what is feasable with regards to "nothing" are not going to be accurate.

You should also know that cosmology is still an active research field. The Big Bang is not a law, it just happens to be the best theory to date given our incomplete Mr.Magoo-like view of the universe. Many people working within the field do not like the BB theory and are actively trying to develop alternatives.

In any case, the somewhat tenetive big Bang theory really has nothing to do with the well-tested Evolutionary theory.

old comment by JonD

The main reason creationists/IDiots dont get money is that they dont have anything to bloody research.

IDiot: Yessir, I'd like a grant please..

Grant committee: What are you researching?

IDiot: That the universe and everything in it was designed by a floaty being in the sky

Grant committee: How to you intend to test this? what makes this a good investment?

IDiot: I'm going to read my bible, quote mine real scientists papers and books to find convenient passages that look good from my point of view when I quote them out of context and capitalize every second word in my report to make sure people pay attention.
Oh and why will it be a good investment? because once everyone believes me, we will not have furthered our knowledge of how the universe actually works one little bit.

Grant committee: err.. dont call us, we'll call you.

old comment by Swede

No, the funds all go to people who can convince the giver that their research is going to be fruitful and profitable. Research into evolution are often both those things, and have resulted in many new and better medications and treatments.

Evolution is only about the adaptation of existing life, it is not about the origin of the Universe (that is the Big Bang Theory) or the origin of life (that is the Abiogenesis hypotheses).

The Big Bang was an expansion, not an explosion.

If this is what you and other creationists think research is, then it's obvious why you have never gotten any funds. If you can't even be bothered to flick through a fifth grade natural science book, then you will definitely not be able for the years of hard work and studying that is needed for serious research.

old comment by Anon-e-moose

"To do research, creationists need funds. But all the funds go to those who believe in Evolutionism, the carefully protected, useless and and literally baseless religion. Yes, baseless"

...yet, CERN raised billions to build the Large Hadron Collider. Not one single cent in US taxpayer's money.

Bet that burns you Cre(a)ti(o)nists. And in more ways than one, too. >:D

CERN discovering the Higgs-Boson. The Cosmologists/Theoretical Physicists such as Prof. Stephen Hawking proved right. Still not seen any proof of your 'God' replicating his 'Creation', as described in your book of fairytales. But then, he could have done so, and in a more modest way. Just two years before your BS, and in person during a certain court case. I mean, what stopped him then, as it shouldn't now...?:

image

...because an 'omnipotent' God wouldn't limit his omnipotence in any way, would he not? Why should he? [/1 Thessalonians 5:21 (KJV)]

"Because I sure am interested in what is in NOTHING!"

And that last line is the most telling aspect of Istvan's arse gravy. Your 'God' = NOTHING indeed. The Gaps, they keep on a-fillin'...! [/Bob Dylan]

Istvan #fundie cseblogs.com

42 comments

Confused?