Who could Time magazine pick for Person of the Year to most disgust any readers who aren’t barking moonbats? Some say parasitical slut Sandra Fluke, who lent herself to be used as a tool in Obama’s farcical though apparently successful War on Women campaign tactic[...]
Fluke’s appeal for coercively subsidized degeneracy was all the more preposterous because the 31-year-old was attending a Catholic university, where vestigial remnants of morality can be expected even now. Law school tuition there runs $24,417.50 per semester, well beyond the reach of someone who can’t afford $1 condoms.
It would be hard to imagine a more profoundly unappealing human being than Sandra Fluke — which makes her a natural candidate for the slime at Time.
46 comments
"Some say parasitical slut Sandra Fluke,"
Using the royal "We" again, Dave?
Rush Limbaugh really hit one out of the ballpark with this one, didn't he? Sandra Fluke never testified about her own sex life, but yet Rush has all the right wing nutjobs believing that she's such a slut she needs tons of free birth control. Great job, Rush.
Unlike hormone-based contraceptives, condoms don't do a damn thing to help with polycystic ovary syndrome the conditioned suffered by Fluke's friend on whose behalf she testified.
Blount, like his hero Limbaugh, are hate-filled liars. (But, we already knew that, didn't we?)
"It would be hard to imagine a more profoundly unappealing human being than Sandra Fluke.
No, Dave. Not really.
"Some say.."
And some might say that people who frequently employ transparent apophases in speech have little or no backbone. Not me, though. I would never suggest such a thing.
image
It's a sad tactic. Somebody brings forth a well reasoned argument why they or somebody else requires help from society. That person happens to be female, and the only thing conservatives do is revert to insults. Michelle Obama is fat, Sandra Fluke is a slut and I'm the fucking King of China.
Law school tuition there runs $24,417.50 per semester, well beyond the reach of someone who can’t afford $1 condoms.
yes dave, everybody who goes to college pays their tuition up front.
just like people who want to own a home cut a check for $350,000 to the realty company and people who drive new cars just handed a sack of cash over at the dealership.
It would be hard to imagine a more profoundly unappealing human being than Sandra Fluke
Oh, it's not that hard. Here, walk into the bathroom and look over the sink. The answer will be right in front of you.
It would be hard to imagine a more profoundly unappealing human being than Sandra Fluke ...
Actually it's easy. A misinformed, bloviating douchebag like yourself, for example.
Hmmmmm. It's stupid and mean spirited but not really very fundy. However...
The point that Ms. Fluke was trying, and succeeding, to make is that the health insurance that women pay for should cover contraceptives without regard to the Bronze Age superstitions practiced by the institution administering the health insurance.
Don't know if you're aware of this Mr. Blount (Who am I kidding? Of course you don't), but TIME picks a person who is perceived to have had a great impact on national or world events. They don't have to be likeable, noble, or possess any redeeming characteristics at all, just to have had a marked influence in our lives. That's how Ayatollah Khomeini made it one year. Although I will say that I find Ms Fluke to be attractive, intelligent, and I agree with her position. Whether YOU like her or not is inconsequential to the editors at TIME.
Now fuck off and try to find a brain that does more than just regulate your autonomic nervous system.
Who could Time magazine pick fo' Person of tha Year ta most disgust any readaz whoz ass arenât barkin moonbats, biatch? Some say parasitical supa-ho Sandra Fluke, whoz ass lent her muthafuckin ass ta be used as a tool up in Obizzayâs farcical though apparently successful Battle on Booty campaign tactic[...]
Flukeâs appeal fo' coercively subsidized degeneracy was all tha mo' preposterous cuz tha 31-year-old was attendin a Catholic universitizzle, where vestigial remnantz of moralitizzle can be expected even now, nahmeean, biatch? Law school tuizzle there runs $24,417.50 pa semester, well beyond tha reach of some muthafucka whoz ass canât afford $1 jimmy hats.
It would be hard ta imagine a mo' profoundly unappealin human bein than Sandra Fluke â" which makes her a natural muthafucka fo' tha slime at Time.
"It would be hard to imagine a more profoundly unappealing human being than Sandra Fluke which makes her a natural candidate for the slime at Time."
Oh, I think I could name at least one other person, Dave .
"It would be hard to imagine a more profoundly unappealing human being than Sandra Fluke..."
No, it's not hard at all...
Adolph Hitler
Joseph Stalin
Vlad The Impaler
Jeffery Dahmer
Joseph Fritzl
Paul Benardo & Karla Homolka
Saddam Hussein
Ivan The Terrible
John Wayne Gacy
Cheyenne Cherry
Ken Rex McElroy
Leona Helmsley
Jimmy Savile
Garry Glitter
Tons of murderers, rapists, kiddy-fiddlers, wackos, sadists, psychopaths, corrupt CEOs and other losers.
...oh, almost forgot for my list...
Dave Blount
Finally, Sandra doesn't belong on this list at all. So THERE! *PPPPBBBTTTTHHH*
It'd also be fun to see Time actually explore her story contra the Wingnut world delusions.
Would that really help anything? How many non-fundies actually think she was "guilty" of even 5% of what Rush accused her of? Fundies aren't going to change their minds because a) Time is clearly poisoned by liberal bias (as is every news organization and figure to the left of Rush) and b) once they settle on a "fact," they'll never change their personal "facts" even if some new information come to light.
where can you buy condoms for $1 ? are they ribbed or studded, perhaps lubed ? and $1 ?
Women should noy buy condoms anyway, thats a mans responsibility.
"It would be hard to imagine a more profoundly unappealing human being than Sandra Fluke"
I'd be quick to turn around and nominate Dave Blount, but he added the stipulation 'human being' which automatically precludes him.
It would be hard to imagine a more profoundly unappealing human being than Sandra Fluke
Not, in fact it's pretty simple to imagine a more profoundly unappealing human being than Sandra Fluke: and he's fat too:
image
Reynardine: Right the fuck on! *high five*
UHM: Nail, head, WHAM. Have a cookie!
1478648: How delightfully Bronze-Age goatfucker of you. What did our foremothers of the counterculture era fight for, again?
"It would be hard to imagine a more profoundly unappealing human being than Sandra Fluke."
Oh, I don't know, there's this guy called Dave Blount...
I realize they're making a portmanteau from moonbat and battery, but it's amusing to me that like fundamentalists are fundies, people from Moonbattery could be called moonbats.
Makes at least the first bit funny.
I feel really, really sorry for Sandra Fluke.
Rush Limbaugh has gone and convinced a sizable portion of the American population into thinking she is some kind of deranged, disgusting nymphomaniac demanding government handouts. Instead of the brave intelligent women who wants the insurance she pays for herself to cover the medication women may need.
She is a name known by all Americans and quite a lot of people around the world. She will have to go through life with this undeserved infamy. She is probably harassed and demeaned on a regular basis by people just like this poster all because of the lies of Rush Limbaugh.
It makes me sick to think that this woman's future and life will have been irreparably harmed in such a way.
In what way is Sandra Fluke a parasite or a slut? She wanted a friend of hers to be able to afford medication against her polycystic ovary syndrome. Ms Fluke lent herself to be a spokesperson for people who are not as educated and/or articulate as she is.
What does morality have to do with medical afflictions of the uterus? Condoms won't help against polycystic ovary syndrome, asshole!
If anything, Obama is fighting on the side of Women. People like Limbaugh, Todd Akin, Judge Jacqueline Hatch, etc, are fighting against women and equal rights.
I'd say that a person who knowingly lets herself be a symbol for unappealing misogynistic bigoted monkeys like you to throw their verbal feces at, for the sake of heir friends, is a profoundly appealing human being, which does make her a natural candidate for Person of the Year; a person who actually stands up for her principles and values, even if her reputation might be damaged in the process.
Yet another example of why we REALLY, REALLY need a 4th addition: "Sexists Say The Darndest Things". It doesn't neatly fit in any of the 3 current archives. It would fit best in the aforementioned category.
Such a category doesn't need to just be exclusively male sexism against females if that's what the hold-up is. It can have female sexism against males too just like Racists Say The Darndest Things also has nonwhite against white racism.
where can you buy condoms for $1 ? are they ribbed or studded, perhaps lubed ? and $1 ?
Women should noy buy condoms anyway, thats a mans responsibility.
>Implying buying condoms causes women to spontaneously combust.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.