There is zero proof of black holes. Now, if someone wants to believe in them that's fine. There is some evidence that can be interpreted that way, and maybe they do exist, I'm not saying they don't. I'm just saying there is no proof of them. So if somebody says there are black holes, the reason they are saying that, and they probably don't even know it, they are trying to rescue the Big Bang Theory because the Big Bang Theory would say if the matter expanded or blew out from the Big Bang it should be evenly distributed. There are billions of miles of nothing, then clumps of matter called galaxies. The real purpose behind the black hole idea is to rescue the Big Bang - to explain why there is the nothings between the somethings.
51 comments
Kent, it's called "gravity" + localised non-symmetries in the early universe and stellar evolution to boot.
Your strawman's on fire again...
"There is zero proof of god/s. Now, if someone wants to believe in them that's fine. There is some evidence that can be interpreted that way, and maybe they do exist, I'm not saying they don't. I'm just saying there is no proof of them. So if somebody says there are fod/s, the reason they are saying that, and they probably don't even know it, they are trying to rescue the God/s Theory because the God/s Theory would say if the matter expanded or blew out from the God/s it should be eveerywhere believed. There are billions of books, then a clump of turgid pages matter called The Bible. The real purpose behind the Bible is to rescue belief in god/s - to explain why there is nonsense and contradiction in belief in god/s.
Only it doesn't.
There is zero definitive proof of BHs, but then there is zero definitive proof of anything.
Black Holes are still a 'theoretical' part of our cosmological models, and a number of massive bodies that conform to the predicted properties for BHs - hence are believed to be BHs - have been identified. But not all cosmologists believe they are real.
http://space.newscientist.com/article/dn12089-do-black-holes-really-exist.html
That said, everything after that opening statement is pure 'kent'. Black Holes are believed to be formed by the collapse of massive stars, but if the Big Bang model predicted that matter should be evenly distributed, how would stars form to collapse into Black Holes in the first place?
When your own strawmen don't stand up, you know you're going stir crazy!
I do believe we have no real concrete proof about black holes... Just mathematical equations that 'are logical.'
There are billions of miles of nothing, then clumps of matter called galaxies.
Voyager I is something like 10 billion miles away, and is still within the solar Oort cloud.
Fucktard. Liar. Loser. Convict. Hovind.
Also...re black holes: Gravitational lensing. Something that Einstein predicted.
Every time I read that this fuckwit taught science, I grit my teeth. I don't know what he taught, nor to whom he taught it, but it sure as hell wasn't science.
Actually, black holes are a whole lot of something in a tiny area. Study.
Big Bang says little about the actual composition of the primordial ball of universe. It were perfectly homogeneous, it would explode into a sphere, but that is doutbtful.
Gravity = Galaxies clumping together. Moron.
He might be better served if he read something a bit more modern, than a edited for content bible.
There is/has been proof of black holes for almost 5 years now.
"There is zero proof of black holes"
O RLY, Kentypoos?:
1- Place two mirrors, facing each other.
X3
If it wasn't signed Kent Hovind, I would have guessed it was written by a 13 year old boy.
Unlike Mr. Hovind, I've done the math that implies that in certain naturally-existing situations there's some holy SHITSNACKS sort of stuff going on that we call a "black hole". And yeah, the term applies pretty well to certain things that we predicted and since then have observed .
There was mathematical proof of their existance, given the laws of physics, long before they were found. There are also object in space that behave exactly like black holes should, if black holes existed.
You know what has zero proof? Hovinds claims of what science says.
None of his explanations of scientific principles resemble real ones at all. Hovind also claims science says a Big Bang came from nothing, spat out fully formed planets, they should all spin the same way, everything in space should be evenly distributed. No concept of the Big Bang has ever made such claims.
Only the creationist lie machine says such things.
could be gravity, or the wake of the wings of the great good fairy Betty, who created everything by her sheer stupidity in flying near a brane.. no scratch that. Betty, whose magnificence lights the Universe.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
