GMU1993 #fundie

GMU1993 #fundie fredericksburg.com

Opinion polls of even so-called "moderate" muslims indicate an overwhelming support for the imposition of sharia law in the US and around the world. As an American it is expected you will support and defend the Constitution. Sharia law directly conflicts with the freedoms we cherish. You are allowed to espouse any belief or opinion - but that doesn't mean we have to aid and abet a death cult. And where were the editorials supporting bakers that didn't want to make a cake because of their religious beliefs? Will this editorial board denounce the mosques when they refuse to perform gay marriages? Spare me your self-righteous preening. You'll be calling those of us that rightly resist muslim aggression racists (it's an ideological religion - not a race - trying reading up on it) even as they saw your heads off for offending their tender sensibilities. And don't worry Democrats - if you let a few more welfare cases through the border, even the christian syrians - you'll still be able to buy their votes. How about we use our tax dollars on homeless vets and not on so-called refugees (funny that they don't just go to a nearby, rich, muslim nation like Kuwait - I forgot - they are allowed to defend their borders). A government that can't run a website can't vet 1000s of men that were probably celebrating the attacks on Paris only a few days ago.

30 comments

old comment by Jerry

This is basically true. A "moderate Moslem" is much like a "moderate" Nazi. They may not be as dedicated to all the evil causes of their ilk, but they do subscribe to the overall philosophy and agenda.

Just as important, if not more so, is the fact that we need to follow the TRUE intention of our Constitution. Our Constitution guarantees the freedom of religion. But what does it mean by that? It means the freedom of Christians to practice (real) Christianity. When the founders wrote the Constitution, that's what they meant. Because "religion" back then simply mean Christianity. And not just any "Christianity", but true Biblical Christianity.

In the name of the Lord,
Jerry

old comment by Jerry

Churchy:

True Biblical Christianity is neither Protestant nor catholic. It is believing and following the Christian Bible. And while some Protestants may be Christians, vast majority are not. Nor are most Christians Protestants. Really, true Protestants are only Lutherans and some Reform churchers that formed in protest of Catholic practices, and would rejoin the Catholic church if these practices were to change. By and large, Christians to not belong to these "denominations".

And the founding fathers did say Christianity. That's what "religion" in their writings mean. If they meant any other religion, they called it by name, e.g. Catholicism, Mahometanism, etc.

In the name of the Lord,
Jerry

old comment by Swede

You ought to do a poll of Christians, to see how much support imposing Biblical laws in the US has.
Biblical law also directly conflicts with the freedoms we cherish.
As everyone has the right to espouse any belief or opinion, neither can be force onto others.

Cakes are not religious.

Are Churches in the US forced to perform gay marriages?

If you persecute Muslims because of their belief, I will call you a racist, until we have a similar word that covers this. As humans are all the same race, "racism" is also wrong.

What about the tender sensibilities of the bakers?

Why aren't you using your tax dollars on homeless vets? Why are you only now worrying about the homeless vets? There were homeless vets before the war in Syria began.

You are not allowed to defend your borders? What, then, is the thing on the top picture?
image

Most Muslim nations around the world have denounced the Paris attacks.

old comment by Anon-e-moose

@Gay Jerry

"True Biblical Christianity is neither Protestant nor catholic. It is believing and following the Christian Bible"

...which you admitted was the QJV.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_relationships_of_James_VI_and_I

Gay king, thus gay Bible, therefore gay God.

Ergo, Gay Jerry.

And as Queen James I was head of the Protestant Church of England, therefore you're a Protestant too.

Even your way out fringe form of so-called 'True Christianity', Jerryianity is a denomination, just as David Koresh's Branch Davidians were one of the 30,000+ ones out there.

Does the Catholic church use the Bible authorised by Queen James I? Which was the first established, Christian church, Jer? You say you're not a Protestant after all, therefore...!

http://www.fstdt.net/QuoteComment.aspx?QID=114679&Page=2#1886862

@John

"Since Protestants believe that one is justified by faith alone and not works, I assume you're a Roman Catholic."

Proddy or Left-footer. The choice is yours...!

Enjoy your hypocrisy-based paradox. Don't forget, Matthew 23:13. Also:

'It is a disgraceful and dangerous thing for an infidel to hear a Christian, presumably giving the meaning of Holy Scripture, talking nonsense on any topic; and we should take all means to prevent such an embarrassing situation, in which people show up vast ignorance in a Christian and laugh it to scorn... Reckless and incompetent expounders of Holy Scripture bring untold trouble and sorrow on their wiser brethren when they are caught in one of their mischievous false opinions and are taken to task ... they will try to call upon Holy Scripture for proof and even recite from memory many passages which they think support their position, although they understand neither what they say nor the things about which they make assertions'

http://www.fstdt.net/QuoteComment.aspx?QID=114631&Page=2#1887363

"Canadiest

"@Jerry, like Aptivaboy you've proven yourself to be among that statistical group called fundamentalists who know the LEAST about what's in ANY Bible. Y'wanna keep making it up as you go along, fine, most preachers do, just stop claiming you get it. You've repeatedly shown you don't know SFA about it.

Go read it, and don't bother with the KJB, it's recognized as the WORST, most inaccurate translation of original scripture by something not found in Fundamentalist circles: Educated Biblical scholars, trained translator and secular proffesionals. Hardly the class of people you Jim-Bob worshippers can compete with."

old comment by Frogflayer

Ah yes - True Biblical Christianity.

Time to call on Emo

Once I saw this guy on a bridge about to jump.
I said, "Don't do it!"
He said, "Nobody loves me."
I said, "God loves you. Do you believe in God?"
He said, "Yes."
I said, "Are you a Christian or a Jew?"
He said, "A Christian."
I said, "Me, too! Protestant or Catholic?"
He said, "Protestant."
I said, "Me, too! What franchise?"
He said, "Baptist."
I said, "Me, too! Northern Baptist or Southern Baptist?"
He said, "Northern Baptist."
I said, "Me, too! Northern Conservative Baptist or Northern Liberal Baptist?"
He said, "Northern Conservative Baptist."
I said, "Me, too! Northern Conservative Baptist Great Lakes Region, or Northern Conservative Baptist Eastern Region?"
He said, "Northern Conservative Baptist Great Lakes Region."
I said, "Me, too! Northern ConservativeBaptist Great Lakes Region Council of 1879, or Northern Conservative Baptist Great Lakes Region Council of 1912?"
He said, "Northern Conservative Baptist Great Lakes Region Council of 1912."
I said, "Die, heretic!" And I pushed him over.

old comment by Indicible

@ Jerry

If they wrote religion, it meant any religion. If they meant christianity, they would have written christianity. That is basic law drafting, unless you have proof they actually meant what you say they meant.
Show us where they wrote or said that.
What is more, what makes you say they were christians? Quite a few of them were deists, some even arguably atheists, so, why would they consider christianity, whatever that is, as the sole religion?

As usual, your ilk lies. I am told (actually, no, I read it in your own book) that lying is actually forbidden in your religion, that you claim to uphold. So, that makes a liar to us and a law breaker in your religion. Naughty Jerry.