www.web.archive.org

W. F. Price #fundie #sexist web.archive.org

We are supposedly living in an age of merit, where the best rise to the top through a selective process that rewards valuable traits. This so-called meritocracy is often used to explain away our growing economic inequality. Those who make it, you see, just have the right stuff. This idea of merit was largely invented and is fostered by elite institutions, which pride themselves on selecting for what they call merit. Perhaps it’s a relic of Calvinist predestination, in which a member of the “elect” is destined to be graced by God.

While it’s true that having talent, determination and grit still matters a great deal, we ought to take a closer look at the meritocratic process and what traits it professes to value. Additionally, the traits it fosters and its results are important indicators of what these people and institutions call “merit.”

So, what do we find? A notion of merit that has no room for the traditional virtues yet encourages what used to be known as sin. We find a glorification of pride, greed, lust and gluttony, among others.

Using the seven deadly sins as a standard, let’s examine our “meritocracy” and how it measures up:

Lust

Promiscuity, licentiousness and all manner of sexual practices are cherished and valued in our elite institutions of higher learning. Not only are they protected, but often celebrated by students and schools alike. Extramarital sex is seen as a “right,” while traditional marriage is frowned upon and ridiculed.
Gluttony

Gluttony is not strictly about overeating; it also applies to those who do not eat simply, who seek out strange foods, and who have elaborate rituals around eating. The urban trends of shopping at Whole Foods, eating out at chic restaurants frequently, and seeking out trendy foods fits right into the category of gluttony. Obsessive preoccupation with health food is another example, as is binging and purging. Eating disorders are, for the most part, examples of gluttony, and are common among the people of merit.
Greed

This one goes without saying. An important reason people strive to become members of the meritocratic elite is to make more money. They dream of fancy homes in upscale neighborhoods, isolated from the great unwashed. They want to take trips to Paris and Rome, own the newest, trendiest gadgets and wear the finest clothes.
Sloth

Most people who make it into meritocratic institutions are not layabouts, but they do often fail to put any significant work into developing their spiritual/humanitarian side. Instead of striving to become better people, they focus on networking with the powerful, and thereby betray a general lack of sincerity in their contrived humanitarianism. An example of this is the filler “humanitarian” work they do only to pad out their applications and resumés rather than for any real concern for people in need. On the academic side, they have begun to cheat with alarming frequency, which demonstrates a form of laziness.
Wrath

The rage many of our elites feel toward the common American people is all too obvious. Their searing contempt for what they call “ignorant” people, particularly the more humble, religious sort, can manifest itself in almost demonic denunciations and displays of ethnic and religious hatred. This is especially true of feminists, who have an inordinate fondness for hate porn, particularly when directed against those they perceive as part of the “patriarchy.”
Envy

Envy is often what is behind the desire to join the meritocracy in the first place. For many students and finished elites alike, the institutions themselves provide the tools and opportunities to seize that which they covet, and to profit from the losses of others.
Pride

Pride is the foremost of sins, and it is also the defining characteristic of the new elite. They take enormous pride in being elevated above their fellow countrymen, and wallow in this pride to no end. The American meritocracy is, above all, a collection of the very proud, secure in their superiority.

Of course, we can point out sin in all sorts of groups of people, but my little exercise here was intended to get people to think about what it means when we throw terms like “merit” around. There’s no doubt that people who make it to the top usually possess admirable qualities and talents, but when these are put to use in rotten ways, what they call merit is actually meretricious.

I could find it in myself to excuse some of the excesses of the elite if they compensated for them with good works, but because they have rejected what most of us see as virtuous, it’s difficult to find much redeeming about them at this point.

crusadercat #fundie web.archive.org

The most familiar of Satan's weapons is the propaganda center in our homes known as Television. Children spend hours every day in front of the T.V. watching godless entertainment. I remember when I was in first grade me and my classmates watched "The Land Before Time" The opening monologue for this evil program says "millions of years before the first humans", being a Christian at this time I knew that the first humans were Adam and Eve; so I figured it was millions of years before them. Sort of a gap theory philosophy entered my mind. By the way, did I mention I was in a Christian school when this was happening!? Satan has come a long way. Now thanks to God sending Kent Hovind I am wiser. Homosexuals use television as well to promote there sick lusts, there poster boy for this is SpongeBob Square pants. Some Illuminati symbols have been viewed on nickelodeon, and some NWO propaganda was on Cartoon Network. Christian parents, it is your duty to keep your offspring focused on the face of God; so unplug that T.V. and have a family Bible reading!

Goodbye TimeCube

TimeCube / Gene Ray #crackpot web.archive.org

[Note: Apparently the domain for timecube.com has expired. This is the last post that can be found on the Wayback Machine. I cleared up the formatting to make it (a little bit) easier to read.]

In 1884, meridian time personnel met in Washington to change Earth time. First words said was that only 1 day could be used on Earth to not change the 1 day bible. So they applied the 1 day and ignored the other 3 days. The bible time was wrong then and it proved wrong today. This a major lie has so much evil feed from it's wrong. No man on Earth has no belly-button, it proves every believer on Earth a liar.

Children will be blessed for Killing Of Educated Adults Who Ignore 4 Simultaneous Days Same Earth Rotation. Practicing Evil ONEness - Upon Earth Of Quadrants. Evil Adult Crime VS Youth. Supports Lie Of Integration. 1 Educated Are Most Dumb. Not 1 Human Except Dead 1. Man Is Paired, 2 Half 4 Self. 1 of God Is Only 1/4 Of God. Bible A Lie & Word Is Lies. Navel Connects 4 Corner 4s. God Is Born Of A Mother – She Left Belly B. Signature. Every Priest Has Ma Sign But Lies To Honor Queers. Belly B. Proves 4 Corners.

Your dirty lying teachers use only the midnight to midnight 1 day (ignoring 3 other days) Time to not foul (already wrong) bible time. Lie that corrupts earth you educated stupid fools.

Go Belly-Button Logic Works.

When Do Teenagers Die? Adults Eat Teenagers Alive, No Record Of Their Death. Father Son Image, Not Gods. Every Man Born Of Woman.

Belly-Button Is the SignatureOf Your Personal Creator - I Believe Her Name Mama.

Pastor Told His Flock That God Created All Of Them - Truth Was That They All had Mama Made Belly Buttons, Church Was Full Of Liars.

Earth Has 4 Days In Same 24 Hrs., 1 Day God Was Wrong.
Einstein Was ONEist Brain.
Try My Belly-Button Logic.
No God Knows About 4 Days, It Is Evil To Ignore 4 Days,
Does Your Teacher Know ?

Fraudulent ONEness of religious academia has retarded your opposite rationale brain to a half brain slave. YOU IGNORE 3 OF 4 DAYS -FORCE 4 DAYS ON EARTH,THEY ALREADY EXIST.4 HORSEMEN HAVE 4 DAYS IN ONLY 1 EARTH ROTATION. 4 ANGLES STOOD ON 4 CORNERS. 4 CORNERS ROTATE TO 16 CORNERS WHICH EQUAL TO 4 CORNER DAYS. TEACHERS ARE EVIL LIARS – THE ONEness OF GOD IS STILLness DEATH.YOU WERE ONEness RETARD ON THE EARTH OPPOSITES ALL YOUR LIFE. LOVE OF GOD IS HATE OF CHILDREN. SUPPORT TIMECUBE OR BE CURSED. EARTH HAS 4 CORNER SIMULTANEOUS 4-DAYTIME CUBE WITHIN SINGLE ROTATION. 4 CORNER DAYS PROVES 1 DAY 1 GOD IS TAUGHT EVIL. IGNORANCE OF TIMECUBE4SIMPLE MATH IS RETARDATION AND EVIL EDUCATION DAMNATION. CUBELESS AMERICANS DESERVE -AND SHALL BE EXTERMINATED.
******************************************************************************
The ONLY Official Site
For Gene Ray/TimeCube.
Need Help - Donate to Timecube/Gene Ray at PayPal

Pretty Thin #fundie web.archive.org

(Pro-Ana means pro-anorexia)

Stay Beautiful

Let's face it... Being Ana takes it's toll on our bodies, inside and out. So here are some helpful tips on keeping up lookin' good on the outside.

At a certain weight, which is different for everyone, you will lose your period. This is a good thing because it means that you’re losing weight. Still, it would be wise if you’d take calcium supplements, if you don’t already. Don’t let your mother find out about your lost period because she will most likely take you to the doctor. Never under any circumstances tell a doctor that you’ve lost your period. They will have you in an eating disorder clinic faster than you can say "What the hell?". Before you go to the doctor’s, make sure that you have a date to tell them in case they ask about your last period, and make sure the date is believable.
As you lose weight, your skin will become dry and sallow and it will heal slowly. Make sure that you use LOTS of lotion where it is needed and take a multivitamin. If you lose enough weight, your body will develop lanugo, which is a very fine downy hair that covers your body. It can easily be removed with a mild depilatory followed by hydrocortisone cream.
Your hair and nails will suffer do to lack of suffiecient protein. Use volumizing shampoo and lots of conditioner to keep hair full and shiny. If you lose enough, eventually your hair will fall out. Sad, but true. Try to keep from pulling at the roots of your hair. Always put hair in loose ponytails instead of tight ones. Also, keep your nails polished. Low circulation to your fingertips make your nails turn blue and that’s a thing doctors look for.

Ron Paul #fundie web.archive.org

(Note: This article was salvaged from the Wayback Machine.)

Christmas in Secular America

As we celebrate another Yuletide season, it’s hard not to notice that Christmas in America simply doesn’t feel the same anymore. Although an overwhelming majority of Americans celebrate Christmas, and those who don’t celebrate it overwhelmingly accept and respect our nation’s Christmas traditions, a certain shared public sentiment slowly has disappeared. The Christmas spirit, marked by a wonderful feeling of goodwill among men, is in danger of being lost in the ongoing war against religion.

Through perverse court decisions and years of cultural indoctrination, the elitist, secular Left has managed to convince many in our nation that religion must be driven from public view. The justification is always that someone, somewhere, might possibly be offended or feel uncomfortable living in the midst of a largely Christian society, so all must yield to the fragile sensibilities of the few. The ultimate goal of the anti-religious elites is to transform America into a completely secular nation, a nation that is legally and culturally biased against Christianity.

This growing bias explains why many of our wonderful Christmas traditions have been lost. Christmas pageants and plays, including Handel’s Messiah, have been banned from schools and community halls. Nativity scenes have been ordered removed from town squares, and even criticized as offensive when placed on private church lawns. Office Christmas parties have become taboo, replaced by colorless seasonal parties to ensure no employees feel threatened by a “hostile environment.” Even wholly non-religious decorations featuring Santa Claus, snowmen, and the like have been called into question as Christmas symbols that might cause discomfort. Earlier this month, firemen near Chicago reluctantly removed Christmas decorations from their firehouse after a complaint by some embittered busybody. Most noticeably, however, the once commonplace refrain of “Merry Christmas” has been replaced by the vague, ubiquitous “Happy Holidays.” But what holiday? Is Christmas some kind of secret, a word that cannot be uttered in public? Why have we allowed the secularists to intimidate us into downplaying our most cherished and meaningful Christian celebration?

The notion of a rigid separation between church and state has no basis in either the text of the Constitution or the writings of our Founding Fathers. On the contrary, our Founders’ political views were strongly informed by their religious beliefs. Certainly the drafters of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, both replete with references to God, would be aghast at the federal government’s hostility to religion. The establishment clause of the First Amendment was simply intended to forbid the creation of an official state church like the Church of England, not to drive religion out of public life.

The Founding Fathers envisioned a robustly Christian yet religiously tolerant America, with churches serving as vital institutions that would eclipse the state in importance. Throughout our nation’s history, churches have done what no government can ever do, namely teach morality and civility. Moral and civil individuals are largely governed by their own sense of right and wrong, and hence have little need for external government. This is the real reason the collectivist Left hates religion: Churches as institutions compete with the state for the people’s allegiance, and many devout people put their faith in God before their faith in the state. Knowing this, the secularists wage an ongoing war against religion, chipping away bit by bit at our nation’s Christian heritage. Christmas itself may soon be a casualty of that war.

crusadercat #fundie web.archive.org

Another dangerous source is books. Especially such works as Harry Potter. Do you know that the names and spells in those stories are real? I started reading one of those books, I knew it was wrong and tried to rationalize the content by saying "it's just a struggle between good an evil". Eventually I gave up and treated the book for what it really was, witchcraft. (Ex. 22:18, 1 Sam. 15:23)

Brandon Lakefield/Zerberster and Brainactivator (translater <sic> to English) #conspiracy web.archive.org

LEAKED: OFFICIAL AGENDA FOR THE DESTRUCTION OF GERMANY
FACE OF THE ANTI-CHRIST VISIBLE

Whistleblower report by Dipl-Ing. Dr. Austeja Emilija Dominykas

Translated into English from the German original by
Brainactivator
September 2016

EMAIL titled: A life story of horror
sent to Brandon Lakefield – Wichtig@Zerberster.org

(Forged "whistleblowing" about the German government building bunkers for evil muslims in preparation of genocide against German Christians. Austeja Emilija Dominykas is fictional.)

W. F. Price #fundie web.archive.org

Sometime in the not too distant future, the Equalist ideology that gained ascendancy in the West in the late 1960s will begin to unravel. My guess is that the impending demographic implosion of its creators and sustainers will start the process, possibly within the decade.

When that happens there will be a strong reaction against those who espouse another philosophy, and we’ll see the different sides of the Equalist camp join together in common cause to defend the faith.

One such alliance will likely occur between feminists and Equalist MRAs, who will set aside their differences to fight any new concept of the relationship between men and women. MRAs and feminists may oppose each other, but that’s because they see male and female as opposing forces due to their worldview. To them, it can’t be any other way. Struggle between the sexes is right and natural, because, to put it in Marxist terms, it’s a class struggle. Eventually, in their eschatology, one is supposed to emerge victorious at some distant undefined point, but they really suspect this struggle is more or less eternal and a fundamental part of life, similar to the struggle between good and evil that characterizes some Christian thought.

When someone comes along and challenges that worldview, both feminists and MRAs will see it as a threat, and both will confront this challenge. In doing so, they will work together, as they did in the beginning when Equalism overthrew the old Western order.

I think I’m already beginning to see signs of it. Challenge Equalism, and immediately feminists start defending some MRA causes, and MRAs will begin to say that feminism is only bad in practice, not theory (try it yourself if you’re curious). It’s similar to the way in which different factions of Christians were bitter enemies when dealing with each other, but united in common cause when faced with an external threat.

That external threat is coming. It is gathering forces and preparing for a long campaign. When it mobilizes, we’ll see Equalists of all persuasions align themselves against it.

Jean Valjean #fundie web.archive.org

[Bracketed part is W. F. Price's introduction to the quote]

[Responding to Spanier’s poston raising daughters, commenter Jean Valjean points out some of the problems with feminism+hypergamy as they relate to family formation and economic equality. Not only do men lose out, but women as well, as the combined force of female social elitism and assortative mating conspire to concentrate earnings in the hands of the few.

It would be difficult to argue with Jean’s logic, which is why feminists almost always ignore these issues, despite the fact that they are immensely more important to your average man or woman in an average job than sexual harassment or the gender gap in wages:]

Jean Valjean

Why don’t women have kids at 21 instead of 31 or 41? Indeed it is far more logical for women to have kids earlier. Not just for the reasons you cite but also because by delaying a career for 10 years she can see her children to a point where they are semi-autonomous.

Once her kids reach 10 she can see them off to school in the morning and spend the day going to college or trade school. By the time the kids reach high school and need the least oversight the mother can begin her career and any employer can be assured that she will be more dedicated than if she had no children or had young children.

But feminists don’t want this. As Simone do Beauvoire wrote in “The Second Sex,” women cannot be given this choice because they will choose it.

Most women intuit the lie of feminism: that being a stay at home mom is “oppression” the moment they have a child and want to stay home. For the lucky few they are afforded the luxury of doing just that because of a willing and able husband. For most women, their choices are greatly limited thanks to feminism. Many men simply cannot support a household on their own income. Women, competing against men and employing hypergamy not only results in lower status men but also lower status women.

For instance, if we have a community of 1000 workers and there are 100 good jobs paying around 100k a year, and only men are allowed to work those jobs then that means that 100 families will have an income of 100k a year. But when women compete against men and say 40 of those jobs go to women and those women employ hypergamy then only 60 families have an income of 100k, and 40 have an income of 200k.

This means that 40 women will have to marry men who make less than 100k. This contributes to the widening gap between the rich and poor that many financial pundits fail or refuse to recognize.

This same dynamic applies to those families with two 50k incomes. The actual pain of these lower incomes is really felt by the mother most because she has to work to keep the family at the middle class level whereas 40 years ago she could choose to stay home.

But the real pain is felt at the lower incomes. Even two 20k incomes aren’t enough to allow a family of 4 to enter the middle class. And these lower incomes are the most common (and so is divorce among this class).

As always, feminism has always benefited the rich white women the most because the same dynamic that propels the sons of the rich into high paying occupations also does the same for the daughters.

The problem is that hypergamy (and high divorce not discussed above) are creating more lower income women than before. Feminism is harming women only women are too indoctrinated and selfish to realize it.

(Feminism harms men more but we already know that)

Michael Hill #racist web.archive.org

Only a sick and reprobate society would elevate Martin Luther King, Jr., and demonize Robert E. Lee and Stonewall Jackson. The former sought to manipulate white guilt and use the power of national government for the ends of black racial advancement; the latter risked their lives on the field of battle to preserve the true principles of Constitutional government and the integrity of their homeland. To King and his ilk (both then and now), the U.S. Constitution and the Bible are nothing more than words to be twisted in service of the liberal vision of the good life. To Lee and Jackson, and those who honor them, they are the wellsprings of Christian liberty and prosperity.

There can be no compromise between the worldviews of those who follow MLK and those who salute Lee and Jackson. Moreover, there is no way that a man can, in good conscience, pay homage to both sides at the same time. If you want to know what the adherents of King think of us Southerners, note well the words of an NAACP official in South Carolina, who recently referred to the Confederate soldiers’ monument in Columbia as a “redneck statue.” Some contend that MLK would never have condoned such talk; we will never know for sure. But unfortunately it has come to be the common parlance of those who identify themselves with his worldview.

We in The League of the South choose each January to honor the lives of two of our own heroes—Lee and Jackson. We do so because we know the truth about them, and that truth tells us that they are worthy of fond remembrance. Do King’s acolytes know the truth about him? And if indeed they do, does it really make any difference to them?

If you want a multicultural, de-Christianized America in which our European Christian heritage will be obliterated, then by all means honor Martin Luther King, Jr. But if you wish to preserve the America given us by our Christian European forebears, you had better give Lee and Jackson a second look.

W. F. Price #fundie web.archive.org

The biggest problem with the men’s rights movement is its failure to see the big picture. For some reason, people think they can separate feminism and gender issues from a larger philosophical problem. This is wishful thinking. It can’t be done.

There’s a reason the feminists latched onto Marxist philosophy like a child to his mother’s teat. It provided them with a philosophical framework – a faith, really – that allowed them to deny the realities of human nature by assigning inequalities to political struggles. There are some truths in Marxism. Political and economic inequalities are real, and often stand in stark contrast to natural inequalities, hence the use of the concept of natural law to strike down privileges of birth and other “accidental” advantages enjoyed by some over others.

Today, however, people fail to see the original intent of these movements. In fact, they have an often inverted notion of them. For example, the idea that a woman should be privileged over a man in hiring preference is more akin to the old notion of nobility by birth than it is to the Founding Fathers’ concept of equality.

In fact, the notion that men and women are equal would have been very strange to even the most radical of Enlightenment thinkers. Yet by mysterious twists of fate (and possibly liberal English resistance to French Republicanism), the feminists have coopted the ideology.

So what we are left with today is a twisted interpretation of what was a flawed philosophy to begin with. Now that Enlightenment and Marxist notions of inequality as a more or less purely political, cultural construct, have been discredited, we are left with an increasingly dysfunctional guiding faith in a fallen god.

Is the key to cling to the old idols, hanging on with eyes tightly shut against the mounting body of evidence that we were wrong, or to accept that we made some mistakes along the way and move on? To me, the latter seems far more reasonable.

But in order to move on, we have to reject all that follows from the errors — not just those things that we personally dislike. So if it turns out that, say, men and women are not by nature equal, then we can’t say we want equality on our terms. Instead, we have to make an effort to learn the truth, and then we can go about accommodating it.

So the real problem is not merely feminism, but the original error, which includes a great deal more than that.

Therefore, if you oppose feminism and its associated evils, the most effective way to fight it is to debunk the false philosophy that supports it. And this means we cannot indulge men who adhere to the same principles, whether they are on “our side” or not.

What it really comes down to is truth vs. error, but because “equality” is such a powerful concept today, it must be attacked head on and by name before people can begin to perceive the error. Hence my recent articles on the subject.

W. F. Price #fundie web.archive.org

Given my current dilemma, which is pretty run-of-the-mill for a lot of fathers today, I thought a bit about how it relates to The Spearhead and its existence. On some reflection, it’s pretty clear to me that I never would have thought to start a site like this if I hadn’t been a father. It’s a direct result of a deep need and desire to be a father to my children.

But in addition, it’s also a result of the circumstances that were created when I did my best to create a life that would allow me to be a father to my children, despite all the roadblocks put up by the state, individual feminists, groups of feminists (they operate in packs, like hyenas), and the anti-family elite class. If I’d acted in my own and the system’s best interests, I would have forgotten about my children, and probably would be in a much more comfortable situation today. There is no blame whatsoever attached to men who totally ignore their children, so long as they pay the minimum fees. “Good men,” according to the system, are those who substitute a check for fatherhood.

Throwing a ball with your son, keeping an eye on the boys chasing your daughter and teaching your children are all meaningless to the state. What you are is a human resource — not a father. This is what I’ve rebelled against. It’s what has given me the psychological motivation to keep the site running.

A lot of this is no doubt personal. My father wasn’t there for me when I needed him, and that had pretty dire consequences for me. I don’t want that to happen to my children, so I struggle on, despite all the hatred from feminists, who, when it comes down to it, just want to fuck and get paid for it. That’s really all feminism comes down to: provision and protection for sex. It’s so deeply ingrained in primate psychology that it won’t change in a million generations. Children’s interests have nothing to do with it. Feminists are only the prostitute lobby writ large.

If I am to attach an honest epithet to this site and my efforts, I would have to call it a patriarchal site. I believe patriarchy is the one family system that works best in sum for all involved. It’s best for almost all children, for most women, and most men. For certain elite and standout specimens of both sexes it involves some sacrifices. It is not the best deal for extraordinarily attractive men or women, who can live a charmed life without taking on the responsibility of patriarchy. But why should they have priority over the rest of humanity? Does their pleasure and privilege raise the mean?

It does not, and this is the moral basis for patriarchy as a system for organizing families. If a few extremely attractive or powerful people can benefit, while the vast middle is dismantled, then a chasm develops between classes, and ultimately this is unsustainable for cohesive society. Sure, we want people to be more attractive on average, but giving all the power to the few extraordinarily attractive works in the opposite direction due to constraints on human female fertility and the non-selective nature of elite male sexuality (e.g. Arnold Schwarzenegger). What it does is limit reproduction in the middle and encourage low-investment r-selection in the hopeless lower class, which always outnumbers elites. We then become a disorderly society of a few aristocrats atop a vast mass of proles.

So, I think it’s time to come right out and say that The Spearhead is not equalist, nor does it support “reinvention” of traditional sex roles, but rather is committed to restoring patriarchy as a just, family-centered principle of social organization. And not the despotic form of patriarchy that prevails in slave societies, but rather a more democratic form in which men are held accountable to one another, and the law. It is the ancestral Western model, and it’s what made Western peoples strong, not to mention East Asians, Hindus, Jews and Muslims, who organized their societies on a similar basis, with varying degrees of success. The West prevailed in the 19th and 20th centuries not because of its racial, but rather its social superiority, which was closer at the time to the democratic patriarchal ideal than any other part of the world. Sadly, that has been lost, hence our Western decline.

The restoration of patriarchy should be the long-term goal of all righteous men who care about their families and people. It is the most just, humane and progressive form of social organization known to man. It’s the only system worth fighting and dying for, and that’s why it will ultimately prevail.

Rabbi Manis Friedman #fundie web.archive.org

["How Should Jews Treat Their Arab Neighbors?"]

I don’t believe in western morality, i.e. don’t kill civilians or children, don’t destroy holy sites, don’t fight during holiday seasons, don’t bomb cemeteries, don’t shoot until they shoot first because it is immoral.

The only way to fight a moral war is the Jewish way: Destroy their holy sites. Kill men, women and children (and cattle).

The first Israeli prime minister who declares that he will follow the Old Testament will finally bring peace to the Middle East. First, the Arabs will stop using children as shields. Second, they will stop taking hostages knowing that we will not be intimidated. Third, with their holy sites destroyed, they will stop believing that G-d is on their side. Result: no civilian casualties, no children in the line of fire, no false sense of righteousness, in fact, no war.

Zero tolerance for stone throwing, for rockets, for kidnapping will mean that the state has achieved sovereignty. Living by Torah values will make us a light unto the nations who suffer defeat because of a disastrous morality of human invention.

James von Brunn #racist web.archive.org

[The front page of the website for the suspected perpetrator of the Holocaust Museum shooting]

A new, hard-hitting exposé of
the JEW CONSPIRACY to
destroy the White gene-pool

by

James W. von Brunn

Here are 350pp of FACTS condensing libraries of information about the Talmud, Democracy, Marx, Genetics, Money, Aryans, Negroes, Khazars, The Holy Bible, Treason, Mass-media, Mendelism, Race, the “Holocaust” and a host of suppressed “bigoted” subjects, all supported by quotations from many of history’s greatest personages. Learn who is responsible for the millions of Aryan crosses covering the world’s battlefields. Why our sons and daughters died bravely but in vain. Learn why the “browning of America will alter everything in society from politics and education to industry, values and culture.” (TIME 4-9-90).

Learn who has committed treason - and must be brought to justice!

This carefully documented treatise exposes the JEWS and explains what you must do to protect your White family. Kill the Best Gentiles! Is a must for every concerned parent and a manual for every student of World History.

Fritz Springmeier #conspiracy web.archive.org

[This is from Springmeier's introduction to the wharrgarbl conspiracy book The Illuminati Formula Used to Create an Undetectable Total Mind Controlled Slave.].

The Illuminati have secretly put in base programming that allows them ultimate control over many of the other groups’ slaves. This will be described within this book. For both the ease of reading and the ease of writing, I have dispensed with most footnotes. To provide my sources would double the size of the book, and many of them are confidential. (In the past, when I have attempted crediting information, some people have gotten bruised feelings for having been passed over or for being named. When information comes in from several sources, it becomes difficult to pass out credit.)

Tom Heneghan, International Intelligence Expert #conspiracy web.archive.org

NAZI-Communist Bitch George Soros Has Now Crossed the Line
by Tom Heneghan, International Intelligence Expert

UNITED States of America – It can now be reported that North Korea has been the headquarters for the privately owned U.S. Federal Reserve and the Central Bank of Japan (BoJ) ponzi scheme with NAZI-Communist Jew George Soros’ hedge fund as the major enabler.
Hungarian NAZI Jew Soros has conspired with the BoJ, U.S. Citibank and the Saudi Royal Family to attack the Russian ruble as to create cross-collateralized, undermargined foreign currency derivatives to support U.S. and Japanese equity crisis.
Soros has no cash now given his losses in the gold market but uses crooked offshore entities that allow him to use liabilities aka bank I.O.U.s as assets.
Soros directly conspired with the Obama Administration and the Saudi Royal Family aka closet Zionists to attack the price of oil and overnight futures markets as to further depreciate the Russian ruble on behalf of the privately owned U.S. Federal Reserve and the Central Bank of Japan’s ponzi scheme.
The criminal Obama Administration and the current compromised and blackmailed Japanese government has allowed Soros, on behalf of Ukrainian NAZIS, to use the pension funds of both American and Japanese citizens as collateral in this latest financial looting operation.
At this hour, Christine Lagarde, Managing Director of the IMF (International Monetary Fund) has had enough!
P.S. It is important to remember that NAZI-Communist Jew Soros, along with the Bush-Clinton Crime Family Syndicate, helped financed, along with the Japanese mafia Yakuza, the North Korean nuclear facilities that were then used as a cover to disguise the financial criminality that took place on behalf of the Japanese mafia, the Central Bank of Japan and the Bush-Clinton Crime Family Syndicate.
n closing, as we approach WWIII, it is important to note that Russian Federation President Vladimir Putin has and always will be a devout Orthodox Christian who opposes abortion and homosexuality and tyranny.
Putin knows very well that current alleged fraudulent pResident (the False One) Barack Hussein Obama is a note homosexual and bisexual who received oral sex while doing cocaine in a limousine from Larry Sinclair of Chicago, Illinois.
Vladimir Putin also know through his Intelligence sources, including French Intelligence, that former U.S. illegal White House occupant George W. BushFRAUD was also a rabid homosexual and bisexual who continues sex on a regular basis with his former college roommate and ‘Skull and Bones’ member Victor Ashe and had at least 38 visits in the White House from body builder and his homosexual lover Jeff Gannon.
And last but not least, is former First Lady and New York Senator Hillary Rodenhurst Clinton (elected twice without opposition and conspired in the assassination of John F. Kennedy Jr. who would have beaten her hands down in 2000 Senatorial race) remains a Satanic, 5th degree lesbian witch, who is actually related to 5th degree NAZI bitch Barbara Bush.

W. F. Price #fundie web.archive.org

I don’t think there ever will be an MRA “victory.” One way or another, things balance out. What will happen is that women will eventually pay for what they asked for, as in they will reap the “benefits” of wrecking the family. We must remember that most women – most people, actually – are not all that sophisticated, and others take advantage of them all the time. The average young woman is not currently benefiting from feminism — she’s working a crappy, low-wage job and living a mediocre life as a single parent. Unless she’s both pretty and bright, which is only about one out of twenty or so women (if that), her value is significantly lower than it was a generation in the past.

I’ve pointed it out before several times, but it bears repeating:

When a given society’s men prosper, the women are happy and healthy. When the men are poor and powerless, the women live much harder lives. The reverse is not true, because women do not share wealth. Just look at the average lifespan in counties and neighborhoods where women make more money than men in the US. It’s abysmal. Pine Ridge is probably the most blatant example of this.

Rachel Sacher #conspiracy web.archive.org

The logo Hillary Clinton chose for her 2016 Presidential Campaign is wrong on several levels. Here is what the logo looks like and here is why I think it’s not ok.

image

[...]

This is the worst part about her logo. It looks like a plane crashing into the twin towers and she knows it. You see, Hillary thought about all this long before releasing the worst and most controversial logo in presidential history.

You may find yourself wondering, how could she make something reminds so many people of the tragic terrorist attack on 9/11?

Because Hillary Clinton is heartless and I don’t say that lightly. Her life reveals that to be true. She’s been married and stayed married to a man who has been consistently unfaithful to her. This would break any self respecting woman’s heart, but Hillary has turned that part of herself off.

She was just blessed with her first grandchild and yet she’s going to spend her time running for President. Another heartless move.

And now she has heartlessly decided to remind America of the tragic events that took place on 9/11 for her own political gain…. Heartless.

To Hillary Clinton, I have to say 9/11 is off limits. She’s decided to incorporate a terrorist attack into her logo. That is unacceptable.

So before anyone even thinks about voting for her, let’s all remember the extent of her decision making skills. Anyone who would use 9/11 to advance their political career does not deserve to be anywhere near the white house.

It’s time for Hillary to retire from politics.

Ladies (and gentlemen) let’s see her logo for what it really is – a desperate attempt to create political buzz for her campaign at the expense of the victims of 9/11.

Let us end the conversation about the bad logo and make sure she loses this desperate attempt to make America notice her.

W. F. Price #fundie web.archive.org

Last year saw the spectacular implosion of the feminist narrative and a huge electoral humiliation for people running on explicitly feminist platforms.

You’d think this would open the way to reforms, and incoming legislators would be proposing to roll back the excesses of feminist legislation. If not on the federal level, at least there would be some states doing so, right?

Wrong.

There has been nothing but deafening silence, and nothing has been done to even rectify the unwarranted blame aimed at college fraternities following the lies published by Sabrina Rubin Erdely in the great Rolling Stone rape fantasy article of 2014.

Instead, the lies actually furthered the agenda, and fraternities are being punished as we speak for what has been proven to be a hoax.

Why on earth can’t MRAs take advantage of this situation? Why can’t they find a sympathetic ear?

The problem lies in the continued insistence on playing the same game by the same rules as the feminists and expecting to finally win despite losing time after time after time.

Let’s start at the beginning. Warren Farrell is called the Father of the Men’s Rights Movement, and I think that’s fair. He sincerely worked for gender equality, starting at NOW over forty years ago. He genuinely believed in this concept of equality, but eventually saw that it wasn’t exactly what feminists had in mind.

Eventually, he published books proving that men do not, in fact, have it better than women. In doing so, he incurred the wrath and enmity of feminists everywhere.

So much for good faith…

However, Warren Farrell hasn’t changed his tune. He still believes in gender equality as a laudable goal. You might think that this would put him in alignment with feminists in general, but then again one could say that Stalin and Trotsky’s differences were not really all that substantial, either.

And this is perhaps the best metaphor for feminism and MRA: the Stalin/Trotsky split in the Bolshevik party. Both believed in the inevitability of the workers’ state and both shared the same general Marxist philosophy; they only disagreed on the specifics and how to get there. Nevertheless this occasioned a great deal of hatred. Trotsky and his acolytes lost early on, and from then on they were relentlessly hounded across the world by Stalin’s henchmen.

So here we are in the USA, feminists having won the equality war hands down, holding all the cards politically and having the power of the state at their disposal. Yet MRAs insist that theirs is the “true equality,” and continue to believe that the same belief system that so thoroughly crushed them from the beginning is ultimately their salvation.

It would be laughable if it weren’t so sad.

I’d like to offer another option:

Reject the ideology altogether. Stop trying to compete on the same terms. People who offer promises of this unicorns and rainbows fantasy of gender equality are selling you a barrel of bad apples. After all, you’d end up with the same thing even if MRAs did manage to win. Gender confusion, emasculation, unattractive women, sexual chaos and the destruction of the family.

Instead, recognize that men and women are different, and different rules and standards can and must be applied to them for the benefit of both individuals and society.

Imagine if Russians, instead of rejecting Communism altogether, had simply switched from Stalinism to Trotskyism. They’d still be living in a drab, totalitarian state with severe restrictions on individual freedom and lower material standards.

Same goes for MRA vs. feminism. If you had your choice, wouldn’t you prefer “none of the above?”

Think about it.

W. F. Price #fundie web.archive.org

One thing that has been brought up over and again here is is that it isn’t all that difficult to keep house these days, what with modern appliances and all. This is true — without children keeping house is a pretty simple affair. Even with them it isn’t anywhere near as difficult as it used to be. Still, a lot of guys can’t be bothered, and a lot of these men are single. However, an amazing fact is that most maids are employed by wives (or so they call themselves) who simply can’t be bothered. Not all that many men actually contract housekeeping services because they simply haven’t grown accustomed to the idea.

This is an opportunity that is ripe for the picking. When men go into any business that is traditionally the provenance of women, they generally clean up. Think of the wholesale replacement of wifely industry by the industrialization of spinning, weaving, etc. There are legions of men who have made fortunes by taking advantage of the inefficiency of the housewife of yore. Wives no longer sew, mend or spin, but rather shop and enrich the men who have made their jobs redundant. These days, wives don’t even cook, instead simply opening boxes and reading instructions written at the elementary school level. Put two cups of mix in bowl, add egg and milk, stir with fork… That’s it.

Given modern social norms, it’s time to eliminate the wife from the household picture altogether. And considering the fact that modern appliances make a good scrubdown little more than an afterthought, the amount of labor required to keep a place in good shape is minimal. So, even paying a higher than average hourly fee – say $20/hr – for low-skill work such as housekeeping is reasonable. For your typical childless man, two hours a week is probably more than enough to take care of the details he’d rather not bother with. Add ten bucks for transportation/gas money and that comes out to only $50/week. For that, a man could have a thoroughly clean domicile without any of the trouble that comes along with a girlfriend/wife performing such basic labor, who would surely complain and make compensatory demands anyway. Sure, he’d have to wash his dishes and buy groceries, but scrubbing the bathroom and kitchen, doing the windows and mopping and vacuuming would all be taken care of. Also, the woman (or man) doing the work would be discreet, respectful and fast.

If I were to start this kind of business, I would market exclusively to men — women are always intrigued by what men are doing and would find it on their own, so female clients would appear without any extra effort. I would treat employees with the humanity and consideration that men generally bring to the table regarding employees, and exercise quality control based on my male clients’ feedback (women are prone to complaining and petty retribution, so I’d place less weight on their opinions). Furthermore, I’d challenge the female-run maid services, which comprise the majority, head-on and beat them badly and without mercy.

Stephenson Billings #fundie web.archive.org

So what is at the heart of this secret society of globalist atheism? One of their most significant concerns is the power of Faith. They despise the Glory of Jesus and the hope that He brings to countless Americans. The atheists are so insanely dedicated to their obscene cult they will try just about anything to destroy every remnant of Christian Love on this earth. As this sickening obsession was wed to advances in aerial spraying technology in the last century, one can surmise the evil compound that resulted. In this formula, it seems quite logical that the atheist’s next step would be to attempt the widespread murder of Jesus’s very Heavenly Agents of Love.

Angels. They are much more than a Christian bedtime story. They are much more than the sweet flutterings in the ears of believers. Angels are quite literally the factory workers of faith. They are tireless and everywhere. They accomplish innumerable feats, from minor pangs of guilt to the throbbing passions of love. The angels are there to guide us, to inspire us and, ultimately, to remind us of our obligation to Jesus. The fly through the air at His beckoning. They are gentle and ever willing. We would be far less human and humane were it not for the angels. And that is exactly why atheists fear the power of angels.

Atheists shake with contempt at the thought of love and decency. Their whole lives are dedicated to nothingness, to the gaping void of pain that nihilism defines. Indeed, atheists love pain. They love pain in their sexual rituals, in their drug addictions and in their secret globalist power schemes. Why do we have war? It’s the atheists who spread contempt of God and invite such reckless notions of communism and Islam.

Will Atheistic Science Annihilate Love and Prayer?

As secret atheist scientists in government pursue their goals of undermining Jesus in America, it only stands to reason that they would take their battle to the skies. The aerial dogfight is likely a vicious one. Who knows what advances they have made since the days of DDT and Agent Orange. Yet fight on they do, every single day! Our heavens are coated in a thick aerosol haze of spiritual hate and this nation’s faith is sinking.

In our lifetime, the United States has been bombarded by supposedly “natural” disasters and terrorist attacks. Religion is at an all time low, while sodomy and perversion are at epic heights. Clearly the overlap of these symptoms with the widespread usage of chemtrails is more than just a coincidence. Clearly the astonishing rise of militant atheism in America must factor in. So what is the ultimate answer to the mystery of the chemtrails? Have Heaven’s angels forsaken us for such an offensive maneuver? Or are they actually losing, dying off in plumes of jetliner butchery? Surely America’s atheists in the great halls of government are asking these very same questions.

Berit Kjos, David L. Brown, and Brett Peterson #fundie web.archive.org

The last line, the Pokemon mantra, fuels the craving for more occult cards, games, toys, gadgets, and comic books. There's no end to the supply, for where the Pokemon world ends, there beckons an ever-growing empire of new, more thrilling, occult, and violent products. Each can transport the child into a fantasy world that eventually seems far more normal and exciting than the real world. Here, evil looks good and good is dismissed as boring. Family, relationships, and responsibilities diminish in the wake of the social and media pressures to master the powers unleashed by the massive global entertainment industry.

No wonder children caught up in the Pokemon craze beg for more games and gadgets. The Japanese makers count on it. Since the means often justify the economic ends in the entertainment industry, the Pokemon website is full of tips, explanations, and ads that encourage the urge to splurge - and to express the darker side of human nature. Ponder their influence: [proceeds to list, as a scare tactic fake advice supposedly listed by the Pokemon website]...

Strange as it may sound to American ears, demonic possession is no longer confined to distant lands. Today, government schools from coast to coast are teaching students the skills once reserved for the tribal witchdoctor or shaman in distant lands. Children everywhere are learning the pagan formulas for invoking "angelic" or demonic spirits through multicultural education, popular books, movies, and television. It's not surprising that deadly explosions of untamed violence suddenly erupt from "normal" teens across our land.

Occult role-playing games teach the same dangerous lessons. They also add a sense of personal power and authority through personal identification with godlike superheroes. Though the demonic realm hasn't changed, today's technology, media, and multicultural climate makes it easier to access, and harder than ever to resist its appeal.

-----------------------------------------------

Could Pok_mon influence the children who play it? I pray that it does not happen, but I wonder how long it will be before a grade school child, tries to do what is written on the Weepingbell - Razor Leaf Pok_mon card. It says, "It spits out poisonpowder to immobilize the enemy, and then finishes the enemy with a spray of acid." Does this line up with what the Bible has to say about how to handle our enemies in Romans 12:14-22? I Think not! It is clear that Pok_mon leads the player's imagination down the wrong path. The Bible says that we are to abhor that which is evil, and cleave to that which is good (Romans 12:9). Poisoning, paralyzing, etc. your enemies is clearly evil and no one should occupy their minds with such thoughts, game or no game. Our every thought is to be screened to be sure Christ approves of it (2 Corinthians 10:4-5). If it does not line up, it is to be rejected.

-----------------------------------------------

In Japan, Shinto is one of the oldest belief systems and was developed out of worshiping the earth, such as sun, water, rocks, trees and even sounds (jiggly puff, a cute Pokemon sings a song and the sounds puts all who hear her into a trance – this is a common type of teaching in Shinto and is very evident in Pokemon)!

Shinto teaches that all such natural features were felt to have a god behind their power. Many Shinto beliefs were incorporated into Japanese Buddhist practices after its introduction in the 6th century. Just as they believe in evolution and re-incarnation, these ideas are manifest in Pokemon.

These pictures are typical examples of the dark side of Pokemon. Haunter, an evolved spirit can hypnotize and has ‘dream eater’ power (powered by the purple Pokemon energy cards which is the psychic energy). This power lets him drain the energy from his opponents.

Larry Klayman #fundie web.archive.org

We can't wait 6 months to oust Obama from office

The United States, Europe and the rest of the world is in violent upheaval. At home, fraudulently elected illegitimate President Barack Hussein Obama, along with with his black-Muslim friends like so-called Rev. Louis Farrakhan, leader of the Nation of Islam, and Black Lives Matter allies, have finally succeeded in igniting a race war.

To add insult to very serious injury, President Obama refuses to use his powers as the commander in chief to destroy ISIS and other Muslim terrorists in a decisive way. The reason is obvious, and it’s time for people to just start saying it: The “Muslim King” does not want to go hard against his Islamic brothers and frankly, in my view, sympathizes with their quest to have allah reign supreme to further a worldwide caliphate. To add insult to injury, Obama has, through unconstitutional executive orders, opened the floodgates to millions of illegal immigrants who in many states like California can even obtain driver’s licenses, allowing them to register to vote.

Thus, the Muslim King has subverted the electoral process in favor of his creed as the overwhelming majority of illegals will vote Democrat, that is, for the Wicked Witch of the Left, Hillary Clinton, in November’s presidential election. And, they will also vote for leftist Democrats and others for Congress. This will further the will of the Muslim King after his term ends – assuming he does not declare a state of emergency over the crises he has created and attempt to remain in power.

The last seven and one half years have also seen a never-ending spate of scandals in and around the Obama administration, ranging from Fast and Furious-gate, to IRS-gate, to Benghazi-gate, and now the cover-up of the crimes committed by presidential candidate Hillary Clinton over her private email server. In this regard, it has been disclosed that Obama himself received highly classified emails from the Wicked Witch of the Left on her unprotected private email server, which was then easily hacked by the nation’s enemies, Russia and China in particular. Obama is thus complicit in this breach of American national security, notwithstanding the other traitorous acts he has committed – including but not limited to the sham nuclear treaty with the Islamic Republic of Iran, which existentially endangers with another Holocaust not just Israel but the United States and the rest of the non-Muslim Western world.

Clearly, if there ever were a case for impeachment and conviction of a president, the Muslim King has exceeded “all expectations.” By Obama’s criminally minded standards, President Richard Nixon’s Watergate caper was, in the commander in chief’s own ironic words, simply a junior varsity effort at corruption.

The Hussein Obama is simply the most compromised, corrupt and evil president in American history. While there have been other presidents who committed crimes – and in one of my cases in the 1990s Judge Royce C. Lamberth of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia found that Slick Willy Clinton had also done so in illegally releasing the Privacy Act protected White House file of a woman he sexually harassed in the Oval Office, one Kathleen Willey, my former client – neither he nor any other president has actually been removed from the presidency through constitutional impeachment by the U.S. House of Representatives and then conviction before the U.S. Senate, as is required for “high crimes and misdemeanors.” Thus, while President Nixon, once caught in his caper, had the “patriotism” to eventually resign, he, like former President Andrew Johnson, who was also simply impeached but not convicted, no American leader has ever been constitutionally forced from office.

The Founding Fathers and framers of our Constitution were inspired by God, but they were not God. The likes of the Adams, Jefferson and Franklin were not infallible, however great they were. Unfortunately, they did not devise a viable constitutional method to remove from office a corrupt, criminal, traitorous and destructive president like the Muslim King.

So, today what can we do about President Barack Hussein Obama, a man who at every turn favors only his fellow blacks and Muslims over the rest of us, particularly whites, Christians and Jews? And, it is simply not “favoritism” that I am talking about; it’s dangerous persecution to the point that we all are at fatal risk given the racial war and the Islamic terrorism Obama has furthered with his leftist, black-Muslim comrades. Indeed, the Muslim King, in my view, is far worse and more dangerous that another king, King George III, who provoked the Declaration of Independence and the first American Revolution in and around 1776.

Couple this with the fact that much like the criminal investigation of Hillary Clinton’s private email server was “rigged” by the Washington establishment of both political parties – FBI Director James Comey is a Republican – and the subversion of our ability to have fair presidential and congressional elections given that millions of illegal aliens are capable of fraudulently voting, what would our Founding Fathers do today differently than in 1776?

So, I pose this question: How can the Muslim King be legally removed from office before he does even more irreparable damage in the next six months of his presidency? What would our Founding Fathers have done under these dire circumstances? I do not think that We the People can just sit back and hope for the best, particularly in light of the heinous terrorist attacks of the last weeks, the latest in Nice, France, and the race war Obama and his friends have caused to explode in Dallas and around the nation. Our lives and the lives of our loved ones are in mortal danger!

Survivalist News Network #conspiracy web.archive.org

WASHINGTON— As reported yesterday, Russian President Vladimir Putin triumphantly outmaneuvered Barrack Obama in a cosmic chess match with global nibiru-nowerepercussions. For decades, the White House used the threat of nuclear war as leverage to forestall Russia’s plan to warn the world about Nibiru. According to our sources, Russian leaders from Gorbachev to Putin had buckled under pressure and ceded to Washington’s demands, because, unlike their American counterparts, Russian leaders disdained the notion of nuclear war and believed that Russia and the United States–along with other major world powers–could work together to preserve the human race.

On Monday, Washington’s house of cards collapsed; Putin learned that Washington’s threat had been a thirty-year-long bluff. He retaliated by turning the table on President Obama, insisting that if Obama did not provide the world with full disclosure about Nibiru within two weeks, he would take center stage and make the announcement himself.

Washington insiders report that Putin’s unexpected defiance has caused a whirlwind of panic at the Oval Office. Allegedly, Obama’s closest advisers are split over how maxresdefaultbest to handle the crisis, with dissenting factions distancing themselves from the president’s position; Obama, our source reveals, aims to play the waiting game and allow Putin to make the next move. He believes that Putin is now bluffing and has no intention on confirming Nibiru’s existence.

“The White House is all about gamesmanship,” our Washington source said. “Obama wholeheartedly feels that Putin, angry because his government fell for a thirty year bluff, is now performing a retaliatory bluff. Look at it this way: If Nibiru never happens, would you want to be known as the president who panicked the world?”

White House dispute over Nibiru disclosure and its NASA co-conspirators have struggled to maintain a thirty year veil of secrecy for fear of social and economic collapse. Ever since Ronald Reagan signed secret executive order prohibiting discussion of Nibiru, American leaders feared that disclosure would almost immediately result in a worldwide breakdown of social services, with anarchy sweeping across the globe. With less than six months remaining in office, and with Nibiru not expected to arrive until mid-to-end 2017, President Obama has the luxury of playing the waiting game; Vladimir Putin does not.

Nevertheless, Putin’s shocking announcement sent ripples of fear through the halls of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. Discord between Obama and his most trusted political allies threatens to blow the door open on the Nibiru cover-up. Following Obama’s decision to “wait and see what Putin does,” Secretary of State John Kerry and National Security Advisor Susan Rice held a “closed-door” meeting with General Mark Milley, Commanding General, United States Forces Army Command and long time opponent of Obama’s military strategies. Although the precise nature of that meeting remains a tightly guarded secret, our Washington source mentions a “coup” to seize initiative and launch a surgical strike against Kremlin leadership before it has an opportunity to publicly divulge scientific knowledge of Nibiru.

Meanwhile, Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter held a chilling meeting with Chief of Staff Mark Welsh. Together, they discussed the possibility of launching a full scale nuclear strike against the Russian Federation. Carter was quoted as saying, “If Nibiru is going to wipe out most of the world, won’t what’s left of it be a better place without Russia in it. Maybe we shouldn’t have been bluffing all these years.”

Elsewhere in Washington, Dr. John Holdren, the president’s scientific adviser, admonished Department of Homeland Security Czar Jeh Johnson and Vise President Biden for suggesting the United States launch its entire nuclear arsenal against the Nibiru system to destroy it or divert its trajectory, a proven impossibility according to renowned astronomer Paul Cox and discredited NASA scientist Dr. Ronald Shimschuck.

These absurd scenarios prove the White House is a tumultuous mess. Its leaders are grasping at straws, clamoring for solutions.

Right now, the ball, as they say, is truly in Putin’s court.

WorldNetDaily #conspiracy web.archive.org

WASHINGTON – It’s the age of revelations. Bizarre creatures. The false perception of reality exposed.

And in Watchers 10 , supernatural hunter L.A. Marzulli traverses the world for the truth in the latest installment of his mind-bending series.

Focusing on the DNA testing of some of the more incredible, unidentified specimens ever found, Marzulli travels to Mexico City to investigate the remains of a “fairy” dubbed the Metepec creature, a being some noted eerily resembles the locusts mentioned by John in the Book of Revelation (Revelation 9:7,9,10).

Marzulli’s Watchers 10 , includes detailed scientific research, including DNA testing and X-rays to determine whether or not this small, winged creature is a hoax, an elaborate scam by an individual piecing together body parts, or if it can be authenticated as a real carbon-based life form.

“These creatures are very anomalous. I don’t know what I’m looking at,” Marzulli incredulously tells Ricardo Rangel, who has a Ph.D. in molecular biology.

Rangel said, “Yes, we’ve done different DNA testing on them. The DNA is very similar to humans, 98.5 percent.”

“We have an X-ray of this creature, where we can see the structure of the bones. We have a sample of tissue from this creature that we sent to a DNA laboratory, that we hoped to have sequenced. It was found to not have DNA in accordance with any related mammals on earth.”

“It’s impossible to create a puppet or mold based on these creatures. We must start a serious research into the origins of this creature.”

Rangel gave Marzulli a DNA sample of the “fairy” creature to take back to the United States for testing in a laboratory, but the TSA confiscated and destroyed it upon entering the country.

Also featured in Watchers 10 , is the frightening story of an encounter U.S. Special Forces soldiers had in Afghanistan in 2008 with what has become known as the Khandajar Giant, a 12-15 foot tall being some have compared to the biblical Goliath.

A U.S. soldier, who was part of the engagement, spoke to L.A. about how the Afghan people told stories of giant creatures that would eat people, but they dismissed it as similar to America’s folklore of Big Foot.

He would go on to detail how a number of soldiers were killed in the initial encounter with the Khandajar Giant and how the U.S. military sent in a helicopter to retrieve the corpse of the being after it was killed.

Watchers 10 features exclusive interviews with soldiers who were part of the unit that battled the Khandajar Giant and the C-130 pilot who transported the body of the creature out of Afghanistan.

Watchers 1-10 Bundle is also available at the WND Superstore, featuring more than 10 hours of incredible footage examining strange phenomenon.

In this bundle, you’ll have the opportunity to see the most dramatic UFO videos ever – those actually released by foreign governments hoping for explanation!

The Watchers 1-10 Bundle features investigations into:

What are these strange “orbs” that are increasingly common around the world and easily captured on video?
Are these phenomena extraterrestrial in origin or are they inter-dimensional and spiritual in nature?
And what’s behind the wars and rumors of wars engulfing the planet like never before?
Why are flocks of birds dropping dead and falling from the sky?
What about the gigantic fish kills?
Why are sinkholes suddenly appearing all over the earth?
And is there an increase in volcanoes and earthquakes, or does it just seem that way?
Also, meet a doctor who specializes in removing alien implants from hundreds of patients.
Strange sings in the heavens … strange sounds in the air. Are there unknown objects around the sun in our very own solar system?
What about the Shroud of Turin? Is it really the burial cloth of Jesus?
And is there a cover-up spanning generations to hide the truth about the Nephilim – the giants and mighty men of old from the Bible?
Learn about the strange encounter of a pilot with a UFO that actually audibly announced its proximity to a small aircraft and tracked it in an encounter that defied the laws of time and space as we know them.

And don’t miss the examination of another new and strange phenomenon – that of the appearance of the “black-eyed children” who appear at hotels and car windows, even on boats at sea! They appear with a singular purpose – they want to be invited in!

Who or what are they? Demons? Alien hybrids? Urban legends?

Speaking of legends, the researcher-host Marzulli interviews the leading expert on “The Spear of Destiny,” the weapon that pierced the side of Christ and supposedly gives its owner the power to rule the world.

What significance, if any, does the word “Obama” have in the Bible codes, referencing the Gog and Magog war?

And what secrets does the North Pole hold? Were Admiral Byrd’s and Adolf Hitler’s suspicions right? Is the “Hollow Earth” theory credible?

Question 6737 from Germany #fundie web.archive.org

i am 45 and married to already 15 years now after the sexual desire of my woman has nearly gone i am looking to marry again. And i would like to marry a woman who is 12 years old, her father and she has also agreed, my first wife told me that it could make problems if it will be a big different in age, and also some of my children are older than my second wife. What is your advise ? And is it allowed for me to have already sexual intercourse with these woman after we are married or to i have to wait till she reach at special age ?

Richard Williamson #fundie web.archive.org

[Yes, this is the same Richard Williamson who recently denied the Holocaust on Swedish TV]

Canadians strike me as a gentle people; but "strike" is the word! Ten yeas ago I was innocently asked in Canada whether women should wear trousers. Some ten weeks ago, also in Canada, I was asked whether a girl should go to a conservative Novus Ordo university. The answer now to the second question may be as stormy as the answer to the first:- because of all kinds of natural reasons, almost no girl should go to any university!

The deep-down reason is the same as for the wrongness of women's trousers: the unwomaning of woman. The deep-down cause in both cases is that Revolutionary man has betrayed modem woman; since she is not respected and loved for being a woman, she tries to make herself a man. Since modem man does not want her to do what God meant her to do, namely to have children, she takes her revenge by invading all kinds of things that man is meant to do. What else was to be expected? Modem man has only himself to blame.

In fact, only in modern times have women dreamt of going to university, but the idea has now become so normal that even Catholics, whose Faith guards Nature, may have difficulty in seeing the problem. However, here is a pointer in the direction of normalcy: any Catholic with the least respect for Tradition recognizes that women should not be priests - can he deny that if few women went to university, almost none would wish to be priests? Alas, women going to university is part of the whole massive onslaught on God's Nature which characterizes our times. That girls should not be in universities flows from the nature of universities and from the nature of girls: true universities are for ideas, ideas are not for true girls, so true universities are not for true girls.

Paden Reilly #fundie web.archive.org

...•A third group is Evolutionists, day after day children go to school and learn that the Bible is a lie. Because of this philosophy many young ones repel against there parents and other elders, paint graffiti, do drugs, and commit suicide.

This is the origin myth of Atheism, most likely one of the most dangerous religions around. Atheism is more violent than Islam, more Godless than Satanism, and more obscure than Buddhism. These psycho meglomaniacs are responsible for the 46,000,000+ abortions in America.

There is not one drop of evidence to support such a fairy tail and the evidence that were created by an all powerful being (namely God) is overwhelming!

V the K #fundie web.archive.org

As for the Quran, one thing we are taught about Satan is that he mixes lies with the truth. It's unsurprising that there are many, many good things in the Quran. One could even find laudable tenets in the philosophy of Satanism. But you really have to look at the fruits of a religion to determine whether it is really of God or the Adversary.

Iran is a country run entirely by Islamic clergy. Therefore, one would think that the truest expression of Islamic government would be Iran... a country that is the world's leading source of terrorism and leading violators of human rights.

Someone care to tell me where my reasoning here is wrong?

Van Helsing #fundie web.archive.org

What could be more symbolic of the willful decline of civilization that this:

"Following San Francisco's lead, Los Angeles County and city officials are urging people, businesses and government to switch off nonessential lights for one hour next month to save energy."

By "nonessential," they don't mean lights you're not using anyway. They mean lights you don't need to perform emergency surgery. In the original "Earth Hour" in Sydney, 2.2 million people supposedly turned out the lights in homage to the Earth Goddess.

Supposedly turning off all the lights will prolong the Earth's doom by limiting the CO2 emitted in the generation of electricity. Breathing also emits CO2. Maybe instead of "Earth Hour" we should try "Earth Minute," where we save the polar bears by holding our breath.

Beyond the pointless symbolism, the implication is clear. If we want to save the planet, we need to turn out the lights on human civilization and return to the darkness for which liberals seem to long.

Pastor Peter J. Peters #fundie web.archive.org

Is it not apparent that the Bible Scriptures advocate discrimination, intolerance and the DEATH PENALTY concerning homosexuality? Then is not the Title of this writing true? If the very title made you angry, then this author must ask you the same question the Apostle Paul once asked: "Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?" Galatians 4:16 (KJV).

For those who hate the truth, anyone who proclaims it they will also hate and will consider such a one an enemy. They will accuse their enemy of HATE and INTOLERANCE when in fact, it is they who hate and cannot tolerate the truth. For such people no amount of reason, patience or love will make the truth palatable to them unless they first repent.

There are others who may not hate truth but are so far removed or confused concerning it, that when it's heard, it sounds RADICAL and EXTREME. Many in America's Judeo-Christian church world fall in this category. Because such people have been taught that being a radical or extremist is evil, they tend to reject any truth that, to them and their surroundings, seems radical or extreme.

Once this author spoke to a political science class at a University and was billed as a right wing extremist. So the question was asked of the students, "How many Christians are there in the audience?" About half the hands went up. Next it was asked, "How many radicals, extremists or intolerant people are in the audience?" and not one hand was raised. What a contradiction.

All the people who claimed to be followers of Jesus Christ also claimed not to be what He was. Frankly, He was willing to withstand public scorn and ridicule for truth (Matthew 27:40,41), offend people if necessary (Matthew 15:12) and even die for what He believed in. As for tolerance, he would not tolerate such people as the money changers and actually confronted them physically. (John 2:14,15) Obviously, He was a radical and an extremist to the virtuous, so-called Christian in the Jude-Christian churches, it all seems to unchristian.

The truth of the matter is, in one respect, homosexuals are far more virtuous than are the lukewarm, cowardly, goody two shoes, praise the Lord Judeo-Christians. Homosexuals are willing to:

* Promote their life style
* Endorse public scorn and rejection if necessary
* Rally to the aid of another homosexual
* Fight any who oppose their life style and
* As we shall see in this writing, are willing to prescribe the death penalty to those who oppose them.

Unlike the modern day, lukewarm Judeo-Christian, they are radicals and extremists. To Jesus they are far more acceptable than the lukewarm Judeo-Christian. "I know your deeds, that you are neither cold nor hot; I would that you were cold or hot. So because you are lukewarm, and neither hot nor cold, I will spit you out of My mouth." Revelation 3:15,16 (NASV)

This writing will be opposed as much by those who call themselves Christians as by homosexuals. They will try to reason or explain away these Bible verses that discriminate against and prescribe the death penalty for homosexuals. So in this writing, their futile objections and explanations will be answered.

Carol Bambery #racist web.archive.org

In my experience, the common thread in anti-gun people is rage. Either anti-gun people harbor more rage than others, or they're less able to cope with it appropriately. Because they can't handle their own feelings of rage, they are forced to use defense mechanisms in an unhealthy manner. Because they wrongly perceive others as seeking to harm them, they advocate the disarmament of ordinary people who have no desire to harm anyone. So why do anti-gun people have so much rage and why are they unable to deal with it in appropriate ways? Consider for a moment that the largest and most hysterical anti-gun groups include disproportionately large numbers of women, African- Americans and Jews. And virtually all of the organizations that claim to speak for these "oppressed people" are stridently anti-gun. Not coincidentally, among Jews, Blacks and women there are many "professional victims" who have little sense of identity outside of their victimhood.

Rabbi Moshe Averick #fundie web.archive.org

The Real Deal of Atheism

If Hitchens had presented an honest and candid articulation of his world outlook as an atheist, it would have gone something like this:

MY FELLOW GROUND WORMS:

It is important for you to know that religion poisons everything! Imagine how beautiful life would be if only we would stop trying to treat our fellow man like he was created in the image of God, stop treating him as if the Creator endowed him with unalienable rights, stop pretending that all men stand equal before their Creator, and start treating him like a purposeless carbon based bag of water revolving around a boring dwarf star, like bits of stellar matter gone wrong, like a sick fly, like the ground worm that he is, like a tuna fish that sprouted legs…

Remember, it is religion that poisons everything! The only thing religious people do is to go around killing each other in the name of God. I ask you honestly, does any rational, logical, skeptical, atheistic, scientific minded person really think it's necessary to believe in God if you want to go around killing people? Of course not! Don't let those fanatics brainwash you. Stalin** and Pol-Pot murdered millions and I am proud to remind you that they were fellow atheists. Anything those religious people do, we can do much, much better.

Let's be totally honest. As an atheist I assert that Adolf Hitler's racist notion that the Aryan race is superior to all other races is a "stupid" construct "made out of literally nothing." By the same token, Thomas Paine's idea that all men are created equal is also a "stupid" construct "made out of literally nothing." There is, however, an important difference between the two…Thomas Paine did not have that silly moustache.

On second thought, since as a result of Darwinian evolution species evolve to higher and higher levels of sophistication and intelligence, it actually is quite possible that one particular race, say for example the Aryan race, through the process of natural selection actually did evolve to a superior level and some of the other races actually are inferior. In other words, just like some types of monkeys and primates are smarter than others…..oops, better not go there, that line of reasoning could really get me in trouble…

In the final analysis I really don't know what difference it makes anyway, since I have no conclusive reason to care one way or the other. However, please keep in mind that all of us atheists, including myself, Dr. Sigmund Freud, Dr. Steven Weinberg, Dr. Will Provine, etc., assert that there is no objective purpose or value to human life, and the universe is meaningless and pointless. This of course means there is no real point in me speaking to you, or for you to listen to me for that matter…which makes me wonder…why exactly do I keep speaking anyhow?...But even more important, why do you keep listening? The main thing to remember is this: Although I haven't the faintest idea why, all these things are necessary for morality!

Tim Sanders #fundie web.archive.org

The 88 Skins wish to officially endorse Multinomah County's (Portland Oregon) issuing of Homo-faggot-queer-asspacker-buttstud-Marriage licenses.

It's wonderful that the county has taken such a strong stand for diversity. And if various mentally unstable and homicidally inclined individuals become incited by the Fag freak show to take a stand, we certainly won't be depressed. Considering all the death and bomb threats received, it is possible that some hardcore Christians might perform his own .308 voter recall campaign.

We can only pray for the best.

If our prayers are answered and bodies do hit the ground, gay marriages will have been proven a great idea!

As terrible Tommie sex: worse is better.

In the unhappy case that a random sniper psycho doesn't snap and make County Commie's pay, gay marriages can still benefit the white cause.

Multinomah county is building a database of the names and addresses of the most perverted freaks in Portland Oregon. This will make it easy to round them all up, when the time is just right and have some fun.

First we will tattoo pink triangles on the faggots then pack 'em tight into cattle cars...they always liked to get packed tight...We next transport the happy couples to a fabulous vacation resort to celebrate their wedded bliss. Uncle Adolph's gay pride center and Nazi Concentration Camp.

Rabbi David Eidensohn #fundie web.archive.org

Men and women must dress separately and live separately, to keep from prostitution. The bible would not approve of women in the army, and the taxpayers who pay for the expenses of training only to see a woman relieved of duty before battle because she is pregnant don't approve, either. The entire area of men and women working together all day in offices is a situation that can only lead to trouble, and it does. The feminist surge to be like men, dress like them and go where they go has destroyed family. The recent mayoral inauguration in New York City featured a past mayor with his paramour and the new mayor with his daughter. There were no wives. Most Americans, 51%, are not married, and of first marriages, half end in divorce. Men are marrying later than ever, and women who work and marry later in life have difficulty having children, because fertility problems begin with age 27 and intensify very much in the late thirties. Thus, the mixture of men and women destroys society and women. When New York City first integrated its police force, in every case where a lovely young thing cruised with a man, the man divorced his wife and maintained a relationship with his partner. This report is hard to believe, but it isn't unlikely. The only way to protect family is to keep men away from women. It is precisely the complete abandon of biblical barriers between men and women that has turned male/female sexuality into a trial and difficulty for so many couples, and has turned many people to despair, homosexuality and even autoeroticism, masturbation for men and vibrators for women. The despair of normal gender relationships drives people to pornography and pedophilia, as well as other perversion.

Today, with the chaos of sexuality, there are men who want to be woman. They dress as women and insist on using the lady's restroom. Some have surgery whereby they remove the male organ and cut a hole for the female cavity. Such people sin when they wear the clothes of women, and certainly if they do so to attract men.

As sad and as evil these deeds are, people don't look for them. Society by breaking the family is responsible. A society where people in the fifties know they may be fired when their global company downsizes is a society of fear and instability. Family cannot function in fear. A society that pressures a woman to go to college, establish herself professionally, and only then think about her womanly needs, is a society where many women do not marry, and those who do often marry too late for children. Every woman, from the time she is old enough to think about life, realizes that she is running the gamut. Her fears and anger are multiplied by the social freedom given to men to take a woman, use her, and spit her out. This leads to gender hate, and raising children who are not men and not women.

A society that refuses to accept that a woman is different than a man, and a man is different than a woman, that a boy is different than a girl, and a girl is different than a boy produces men and women who are confused and perverse. Our American society is the first society in history to truly violate the bonds of gender, and we are the first generation in history to have so many pupils in public school from fine Caucasian homes coming to school and mass murdering, that our schools are patrolled as if they were airplanes.

Rabbi David Eidensohn #fundie web.archive.org

A child growing up learns by absorbing, almost as if by osmosis, the gender and personal lessons of life form parents and society. Crucial to proper sexual development is the gender roles of humankind. Today, the emphasis on society is to confuse gender roles, to forbid a man to be a man, and to forbid a woman to be a woman. Children are raised in public schools and watch media that oppose normal gender development. This may be the greatest obstacle to proper sexual development in history. One expert wrote a book showing how educators try to force boys to be feminine, discouraging physical sports and even closing playgrounds. If we have public school systems where students regularly come to school with guns and murder people, and if we don't have this as often as we once did only because schools are throned with armed police, it is perhaps because boys are being stunted and frustrated in their natural masculine growth.

[...]

Therefore, heterosexuality has come under assault. Up to eighty percent of couples indicate difficulty in their sexual relationships. As society continues it plunge away from natural gender roles, these difficulties increase. A woman who is taught to be a man, and a man who is taught to be a woman, come to bed, and what happens? Does the man become pregnant? Anyone who allows a child to go to public school or watch television or movies is tampering with the child's natural sexual growth.

Rabbi David Eidensohn #fundie web.archive.org

The female contains the most sensitive spiritual energy, and wherever she is, flies are attracted along with good forces. The Jewish concept of modesty is necessary to avoid deleterious relationships that come from unwise revelation of the self in the cosmic or social fabric. A woman dancing free in public school and then college is so exposed that her femininity may be damaged. The Jewish home is just the opposite of the secular gender experience. Nobody goes near my daughters until I have thoroughly checked them out. When they see a boy, it is for real. The idea of unleashing transcendence with a dozen people is simply unwise. I have friends whose daughters went here and there, and cannot marry. The parents tear their hair, the girl attends weddings and bravely smiles, and the clock ticks louder and louder.

Yes, there are gender roles. Those who practice Jewish gender roles are saved from the hate that is manifested in secular society between men and women, and it is hate. Studies show that colleges are so full of feminism or hate for men, that men are no longer treated properly on campus, and are gradually refusing to attend college. Of course, they are refusing increasingly to marry. The only solution is to describe gender roles, and to promote modesty, rather than what goes on today, which leads only to anger.

Dr. Samuel C. Gipp #fundie web.archive.org

Me? I'm going to pretend that "Global Warming" is true for a moment.


I look forward to seeing vast corn fields in northern Canada and Siberia. I look forward to the additional rainfall from "the greenhouse" (tremble, please) turning our deserts into lush, fertile plains where new cities will spring up to take in the "overflow" from the "growing population". I look forward to it being warmer the year round, to the new citrus groves in Ohio and the rest of the Midwest. I look forward to the auto and aircraft industries expanding to supply transportation for the expanded populations in our northernmost regions. And I really look forward to San Francisco being underwater!

Kill Femnists #fundie web.archive.org

The feminists who act rude to you at the University of Toronto should be shot to death and the remaining survivors tied to a tree with their throats slit with a dull knife.

You have nothing to lose. Go into the nearest Sociology or Womens Studies classroom next week, and fire bullets into the Professor's head and spray bullets all over the room until all the feminists are dead.

...

If a female student or professor acts lewd in the classroom and disrespects you at the University of Toronto. You can rent a machine gun at Jarvis.

Walk into the classroom and fire a bullet in the feminist professor's head and proceed to spray bullets all over the classroom until all the slutty women are killed.

If you need any guns to kill any feminists at the University of Toronto next week, there is a gang at Jarvis who is renting guns for $40 a day.

TERROJA #fundie web.archive.org

1. I hate children. I think they're dumber the bricks and twice as abrasive. Hence, whatever special treatment that society gives children these days (and yes, it is a fairly recent development that we don't smack the shit out of our little brats when they question our supreme authority) seems stupid to me. When did the adult population become second-class citizens to a bunch of snot-nosed little cretins?

2. If we're talking about people that chop kids up and stuff them in garbage bags while playing the Moby's "We are all made of stars" on their iPods then I have no sympathy for them (because that song is awful) and I don't much care if they get beaten up in prison. However, I don't hate them one ounce more than I hate someone who did the same thing to a 25-year-old or a 35-year-old or an anything-year-old. In fact, I'd be more upset depending on the victim. For instance, if someone killed a 35-year-old artist or scientist I'd be a lot more upset than if the same person had killed 100 children. Children all have the potential to accomplish big things and that's part of why society prizes them--but I prize the people who have already accomplished something more.

Fuck potential.

3. Most of the people in prison for sex crimes against kids are in there for non-violent coercion of older kids (10-15) for sex. I don't believe that such people should be in prison. I don't subscribe to the ludicrous notion that someone under 18 can NEVER give their consent. And I don't view such people as worse than murders or even as bad people AT ALL. Society has placed a stigma on them as it has placed on Jews, on blacks, on gays, on masons, on countless social, racial and idealogical groups past and present.

If you go back a little over 100 years ago, girls were being married off before their breasts had started budding. I'm not saying things should return to that pattern--I'm just using that as an example of who recent the stigma on pedophilia is. Do you think human nature has changed drastically since that time? Do you think that the genetic disposition towards nubile young bodies has dissipated simply because we passed a law or two against it? Take a look around our culture and you'll see that we're as youth obsessed as we could ever be. And frankly, I don't think it's healthy for us to simulataneously deny our nature on a physical level and languish in it on a cerebral level, via Hillary Duff, Britney Spears, The Olsen Twins, Aaron Carter and all the other boys and girls who became international sex-symbols before their 18th birthdays.

I understand that you and countless other sheeple believe that the youth of this country are special and therefore entitled to special rights and priveleges and anyone who lusts after their plump little apple-shaped bottoms with drool pooring from their lips is a depraved and irredeemible monster bent on the hideous exploitation of innocence to feed the bonfire of his carnal desires. The problem with you is that you don't distinguish between pedophiles and child-rapists, which is about as fair as me using Jeffrey Dahmer to exemplify gays or OJ Simpson and Scott Peterson to exemplify straights.

Finally, I'd like to point out that most of the children--boys and girls--raped in this country every year are raped by straight, white men who are typically most attracted to fully developed women. They are usually family members or friends of the family of their victims and use their leverage to get some easy pussy. It's like when you get really desperate as a teenager and get your dog to lick your balls (don't deny it, you fucking freak--Kinsey did studies). People settle. And people with sociopathic tendencies settle for children because they see that they can get away with it and lack the conscience not to.

But sociopathy and pedophilia are two entirely different things. Most pedophiles are not sociopaths and most sociopaths are not pedophiles. Yet pedophiles are judged by the small cross-section between the two, even though most pedophiles have never engaged in sex acts with children and most of those who have did it under circumstances socially acceptible (under the right conditions) just a little over a century ago.

I hope I've made myself clear.

TERROJA #fundie web.archive.org

( They can, period. There is no gene present within the human body that forces a human to actively molest children. Anyone who has the mental faculties to understand the law should be held accountable for their actions. It is the foundation of the law... Sexual predisposition does not justify molesting someone. Ever.)

I agree with all that. Having pedophilic attractions doesn't mean you automatically go out and start molesting kids. From the time I was 14 to the time I was about 19, I used to have extreme pedophilic fantasies, and I somehow managed to never even come close to acting on them. I think with my brain, not my penis.

I do think, however, the pedophilia is unfairly persecuted in today's society.

I think the difference in punishment between child rapists and child molestors should be more significant, with molestors perhaps simply attending mandatory therapy for their first offense. I also think that the age of sexual consent should be lowered to 12 or 13.

My stance is not designed to be controversial or to offend anyone. I only want human beings to understand that the law must work within the parameters of human nature, not in defiance of it.

whitefist #racist web.archive.org

(This was originally a thread for "recovering marijuana addicts" that at some point turned into a racist flame war. "whitefist" is replying to "Secret Asian Man" and "Chief Bearheart")


to the jap and the injun:

secret asian notaman,listen to me you stupid jap,Columbus was here first,not the chinese,if he wasn't then we would'nt have a Christopher Columbus Day, we would have Some Chink Day. Here's a little FYI, I'm not from the south,I live in Maine,but even if I was I would still be smarter than your down syndrome lookin' ass. Maybe in this little fantasy world you live in, gaysians also invented the automobile,air travel,in door lighting,lawn mowers,refrigerators,washer and dryer,ammunition,the atom bomb,etc,and have big dicks. But this is reality my slanty-eyed friend, and in reality the white man invented all those thing and practically everthing else.What did you invent,fireworks and really bad sports,like sumo wrestling.Yeah,nothing like a couple of morbidly obese japs trying to hump eachother. Chief Bearfart, don't worry about immigration, we'll just have to take our land,oops,I mean "your" land, back from those spicks. We took it with force once, we'll do it again, this time with automatic weapons. This will always be the white man's land and don't you forget it. By the way,you say we are feebled bodied people,I'll bet all the peyote in your wigwam that I could whoop your buffalo hide covered ass with one hand tied behind my back. WHITE POWER!!!!!!!!!!!!

Next page