#sexist

The woman-haters, man-haters, and non-binary-haters

Nya Nya Jo #fundie #wingnut #sexist #forced-birth #homophobia edendecoded.com

People want to say that religion and politics doesn't mix, but it does!

Biblical history shows us that the law of the land IS a religion; and the religion IS the law of the land. Ultimately, the politics (religious beliefs) of every society was based on what god or gods were worshiped. And this is no different to what we are witnessing now in our political arena.

SO THE QUESTION is what religious doctrine did Black women overwhelmingly subscribe to, that can be credited for destroying the traditional Black family?

We can NOT say it's Christianity. Because the black church never taught nor endorsed single motherhood as a viable option to Christian motherhood: which is found within the sanctity of a marriage covenant between a man and a woman.

The Bible, along with the Christian faith that rests on it, is replete with admonishments and warnings to avoid the type of sexual activity that leads to whoredom becoming the culture of the land. Nevertheless black women by and large (to the tune of 72% by recent stats) have rejected the biblical Christian standard. So what spiritual standard are they living by?

I believe Black women subscribed to the religious doctrine of Liberalism. You may be thinking that liberalism is not a religion, but it is. Liberalism is a very old ancient religion started over 3,000 years ago.

DID YOU KNOW the following about liberalism?

• Liberalism is based on the Roman god Liber.

• The Roman god name Liber means 'the free one;' its alternate Roman name was Bacchus; and the Greeks referred to this god as Dionysus.

• Liber is described as androgynous, man-womanish, sensuous, naked or half-naked.

• Liber is the god of wine, fertility, debauchery, uninhibited freedom and free speech.

• Liber's worship centered around large phallics; consisted of orgies, drunkenness, intoxication through various potions, and sexual activities (including homosexual acts).

• The Liber cult conducted human and animal sacrifices.

• Originally, Liber rituals were only attended and conducted by women, who practiced sexual masturbation rituals with carved life-sized phallic objects.

• Liber was the patron deity of the common people of Rome (the lower social classes); such as women who had lesser rights than the common man in ancient Roman society; slaves and foreigners.

• Worship of Liber taught civil disobedience to the established social order and the transformation of religious authority. Very much like what we've seen recently in the news with the riots and angry protests after the Presidential election that was won by Donald Trump and the Republican Party.

• In 186BC, the Roman Senate banned Liber worship because it was considered to be a threat to the security of the Roman Republic due to their political conspiracies, crimes and debauchery.

Now, let's take a look at our modern (current) Liberal politics.

Americn Liberalism is obsessed with sex - especially the kind that deals with homosexual and other alternative sexual infatuations. It also has an unhealthy focus on redefining family structure and twisting gender roles and identity.

The driving force behind liberalism is to create anarchy through 'anti-establishment' rhetoric; and to ultimately destroy traditional social principles by using the political system and process.

Modern liberalism aims to:

• End 'partriachy;' which means to prevent men from fulfilling their God-given right of leadership in home, government, moral authority; thus stripping men of their role and rights as fathers.

• Endorse free speech of every type and hue - except for free speech that contains traditional Christian principles.

• Teach sexual liberation; challenge the traditional codes of sexual behavior through LGBTQ special rights, laws and overwhelming media coverage.

• Promote free love; and that sexual freedom is a direct expression of power and authority.

• Normalize birth control (abortion), public nudity, masturbation, sex toys, pornography, premarital (casual) sex, sex with children (pederasty) and homosexuality.

• Reshape the image of the traditional family to include open marriage, spouse swapping, swinging and same-sex marriage.

• Make recreational drugs and alcohol easily accessible.

SO I ASK YOU: How could the black family remain intact with women that chose to adopt a liberal mindset that involved twisting gender roles, pushing the natural boundaries of sex, fighting against the God-given role men were given as leader in the home, indulging in all types of anti-biblical forms of intoxication, and devaluing their children to the point where they see nothing wrong in aborting them?

Liberalism is anti-god in all its ways.

Under liberalism black women have become gender confused, domineering over men (which is a hallmark of that confusion), whoreish (unable to get married, or maintain a marriage), excessive masturbators, sexual predators, cold and callous towards children (including the unborn), promoters of abortion (infanticide), drunkards (excessive drinkers), with a desire to assume final authority over men in the workplace, in government, in the church, and in their homes. These women rather pattern themselves after the image of liberalism, rather than the image of the virtuous women in the Bible who chose to honor God by becoming wives and mothers under the authority and headship of husbands.

And just like that, over the past 50 years, the Liberal political system converted the minds of women into pagan worshipping harlots of the god called Liber.

The Devil used Black Women as a 'legal and lawful' satanic attack on the black family. Ana if not rectified, this is the blueprint the Devil will use to destroy families of other races, ethnicities and cultures.

Satan has the blueprint for family destruction, and he will continue to use it across our country and the world.

Leviticus 19:29 (KJV) warns us: "Do not prostitute your daughter, to cause her to be a whore; lest the land fall to whoredom, and the land become full of wickedness."

So what we are witnessing right now is the result of generational self-prostitution of women; women choosing the lifestyle of whoredom over the standards of the Bible. And unashamedly, Black women voted for laws that led to the destruction of the Black family all so she could have laws that supported her ability to live a life of whoredom.

Hard truth: You don't have the mind of Jesus Christ if you choose to live life as a whore. You have the mind of some other god.

It is our lifestyle that shows our dedication to a specific set of religious beliefs. And we make sure our beliefs are cemented and protected through the laws and policies of our land via civil rights or identity rights.

I plead with Christians - particularly black Christian women and men to get involved in changing this damnable mindset of liberalism that has crept into our churches. Get involved in reshaping the political ideology to be pro-Christian!

We have a mandate and duty to be that light on the hill; I like to think of that hill as also including Capitol Hill.

Will YOU be that light? Become part of the movement to overthrow liberalism in the Church and in the black community. And let's restore the biblical perspective as the right foundation on which to build our homes, lives, communities and nation on.

Incel_Death1 #sexist reddit.com

All sex is validating the female

If you have sex with a female, you are validating her existance. Regardless of paying or the normie way. You are telling her she is valuable for having a vagina. You are engaging in ego masturbation everytime you look at porn, google hot women, flirt with females, create an okcupid account, tinder account or w/e else. This is why in order to not validate the female further you must be alpha. You cannot engage in niceness with the female. You have to be distant but make her reliant on you. She must need you in her life so she doesn't cuck you for chad. You have to stop complimenting her. She must compliment you. Make her validate you. Give her stockholm syndrome, it will make her enamored with you and reduce her validation. She will become weakened mentally as she becomes nothing more than a mental slave.

Henry Makow Ph.D #conspiracy #sexist #homophobia henrymakow.com

WHY WOMEN LOVE GAY MEN


These women love gay men because they affirm their own gender confusion and latent homosexuality (lesbianism.)

These women are unwitting victims of a massive social engineering program designed to turn them into homosexuals. It is sponsored by the Illuminati central banking cartel.

They are the target of relentless propaganda in school and media telling them to find fulfillment in career (self assertion) instead of marriage and motherhood (self effacement.) This program has succeeded. These women are no longer feminine. They are mutants, neither male nor female.

Homosexuality is defined as arrested development caused by failure to form a permanent bond with a member of the opposite sex due to gender role confusion. It is characterized by having promiscuous, anonymous sex to compensate for this failure to mate, find intimacy and grow past the courtship stage.

David J. Stewart #fundie #sexist #homophobia jesus-is-savior.com

[Emphasis mine]

NIV 2011
...the Feminist's Lesbian Bible!

The new NIV 2011 (New International Version 2011) has been released online, now on it's way to Zondervan publishers to become toilet paper. And if you love the Lord Jesus Christ that's what you'll do with the NIV 2011.

The word “men” appears in the King James Bible's Old Testament 2416 times, and 806 in the New Testament. That's 3222 times that the King James Bible mentions the word “men.” But in the feminist perversion of the NIV 2011, you'll only find the word “men” 1027 times in their entire Bible. Pretty sad huh?

The word “man” appears in the King James Bible's Old Testament 3105 times, and 1433 in the New Testament. That's 4538 times that the King James Bible mentions the word “man.” But in the feminist perversion of the NIV 2011, you'll only find the word “man” 1989 times in their entire Bible.

It's a feminist's dream come true! The NIV 2011 attacks the masculine authority of God, the ruling husband, and the authoritative preacher. There is no room for gender equality in Biblical Christianity when it comes to AUTHORITY.

[...]

Feminists are rebels against God. Feminism is a road to Hell (Proverb 5:5; 7:27; 9:18). Just as homosexuals are sinfully trying to merge God's unconditional love with gay rights, so have feminists merged human rights with feminist rights. No one has a right to be immoral. No one has a right to disobey God. A woman's place is Biblically IN THE HOME.

[...]

As I've said often, and so say I again, no one has a right to commit immorality. Liberty is the freedom to BE wrong, not to DO wrong. No one is gay by birth. God doesn't make mistakes. Homosexuality is a CHOICE to sin, just as murderous abortion is a CHOICE to sin. Planned Parenthood is correct to call abortion a “choice,” but it is the wrong choice!

[...]

Women today are becoming lesbians, whether literally or by becoming a feminist (which is a mental lesbian). Women who want to usurp authority and be equal with men are lesbians in their minds. Feminists are mental homosexuals.

David J. Stewart #fundie #homophobia #forced-birth #sexist jesus-is-savior.com

All we hear about nowadays is how religion throughout the ages has caused wars and suppressed people's rights. Increasingly, children today are being brainwashed to view Christianity as a power-hungry "MAGISTERIUM" (i.e., the evil organization in The Golden Compass), which seeks to suppress the rights of homosexuals, Wiccan witches, Evolutionists, abortionists, feminists and other degenerates of society. The fact is that God's Word, the Bible, condemns these sins. Just as Satan caused Eve to sinfully magnify her restrictions (i.e., the rules God had made), so do God-hating atheists today desire to instill in children a resentment for God's Word which restricts the freedoms of the wicked. Public school children are being taught that Christianity is bigoted and unfair, just as Satan caused Eve to think God was being unfair.

The grave danger of Harry Potter and The Golden Compass is that they cause children to view God as being unfair, in a learning environment where any type of discrimination is considered wrong. The fact of the matter is that God commands us to discriminate in certain cases... "But now I have written unto you not to keep company, if any man that is called a brother be a fornicator, or covetous, or an idolater, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner; with such an one no not to eat." Christians are commanded not to associate with any professed Christian who is a drunkard, chases women, lives for money or lives in unrepentant sin. Certainly, Christians are not supposed to associate with unsaved heathens (2nd Corinthians 6:14-17), other than to befriend them with the Gospel as Jesus did. Public school children are being taught that the sin of homosexuality should be accepted; BUT, God says "No." Now you know why homosexuals hate God's Word so much.

David J. Stewart #fundie #sexist jesus-is-savior.com

It is hypocritical and unjust that a woman can drag her husband into court for any number of reasons; BUT, a husband cannot legally do anything about a rebellious wife. If a wife refuses to clean the house, care for her children, be honest with the husband, cook dinner, et cetera; what recourse of action is there for a husband? He can’t call the police because there’s no law enforcing a husband’s right to a submissive wife. In fact, a husband who exercises his Biblical authority to rule over his wife is breaking the law. It’s called “Domestic Abuse.” As a consequence of feminism’s evil influence, many unrealistic laws have been enacted in America. Thus, a husband who tracks his wife’s whereabouts is now considered abusive. A husband who shelters his wife from a meddling mother-in-law is considered abusive. A husband who controls the mail is considered abusive. But God said that a husband is to RULE OVER his own wife (Genesis 3:16). As the law stands today throughout the United States, men have been effectively castrated in their marriages and homes. This is evil.

Having said that, it’s not hard to figure out why many fathers refuse to pay alimony and/or child support—It’s because the Court System is extremely unfair and heathen! God hates a false balance in the courts— “A false balance is abomination to the LORD: but a just weight is his delight” (Proverb 11:1). I can understand why a man would refuse to cooperate with an unfair legal system that caters to rebellious wives and irresponsible mothers. A woman receiving alimony can legally “shack up” with another man who has a good job, and there’s nothing her former husband can do about it. So why should her husband support her if she’s living with another man? It is unfair.

Concerning child support, many men refuse to pay a dime, because the money goes to a rebellious wife, who quit her marriage and abandoned her husband. Women file for divorce at TWICE the rate of men in America. Some men support their children because they want to, and I respect that. That is the Biblical thing to do. A man should support his children; however, I can also understand why men get angry and refuse to pay a dime. Such men realize that the government will support the children, and they will not go hungry. Such men protest an unjust Court System that persecutes hardworking husbands and fathers, placing the financial burden upon his shoulder, while the mother (often lazy) shacks-up with a friend or lives with mama.

acenosk #sexist reddit.com

Feminists hate male virgins

Heard it from the mouth of a feminist today.

A guy in my calculus class got a pefect grade on a test and this feminist who sits in front of me said to her friend: "he must be a virgin anyway"

This was after the professor praised the guy.

Mr. Coulter #sexist #homophobia godorscience.com

As I stated, as they eliminate the biological aspect-they being pro-homo and "convinced" it is a hereditary or biological trait- it leaves wide open the environment as being a FACTOR and not soley the reason. Who said over-mothering was the culprit? Why not an immasculating woman? Preferably the type of woman who bought into the 60s/70s womens lib(lib means liberal) movement. It is gonna reveal that the very perfect liberal woman is the leading FACTOR in boys becoming queer. They are already realizing it and setting up the WOMB as being the fault and not the WOMBman, most assuredly the liberal woman. Hatred for the fetus, setting up hatred for the womb, which is the biological problem with homosexuality. I suppose the cure will be to encourage women to get historectomies which will thus encourage more homosexuality which will then make homosexuality mainstream/de-stigmatized. The United States of homos, boy if we arent popular as a nation now, just wait until that dream is realized. WE will be the envy of the entire w
o
r
l
d

Mike #sexist #psycho rantingsofanincel.wordpress.com

Revenge of the incel

I was inspired by http://thatincelblogger.wordpress.com/ on doxing women who reject him. I have an idea to take it one step further. I am spending this thanksgiving holiday wiring my bedroom with cameras triggered by a signal from my phone (Since I am an incel, I have nothing but time and money to do things like this). The next time I find a girl who wants to sleep with me(been about 2 years without paying), I will record the sex. Depending on how badly she rejects me, I will wait a year and post the video along with her name, number, and address on the internet. Since the one talent I do have with women, is to be forgot about by them, and since today’s cunt, if she is single, goes through dozens of guys a year, it can be almost guaranteed that when she finds it, she will not even remember who I was, or where I live.. That way, the whole world will be able to see that sweet little Lisa, is nothing but a dirty, nasty, fuck slut. Other incel’s will then have another free porn video, to, as the feminists would tell them, use their right hand.

Flannel Avenger #fundie #sexist #homophobia iljboards.com

I think it's important that you do not consider yourself more righteous. The Bible does make it very clear that homosexuality is something that God is not ok with. But it's also clear that adultery, incest, rape, murder, thievery, conning people, lying, usury, idolatry, etc, are not ok with Him either. That being said, I don't see any good argument to allow homosexual marriages. So what if they love each other? If a pedophile loves a 9 year old girl does that make it ok for them to marry? If not, why should the way one feels about another determine the right to marry? It's not about feelings... Marriage is not a government institution; it is a Judeo-Christian institution. It is not up to the government of any state to redefine it... And no matter what the homosexual lobby says, and no matter what any judge says, they cannot change my mind about it, because my opinion is informed by God's Holy Scripture, which I believe to be infallible. I also find it regrettable that adultery is not a crime in this country anymore... Women are not respected as they should be in our world anymore. The respect of a woman is not in considering her co-equal to a man, nor is it ensuring that she has the same employment opportunities as a man. Respect of a woman is to treat her as a Gift from God to all men... we are to keep them from harms way even if they don't like it.

SaintElliot #sexist reddit.com

Incel organ donors should be allowed to sleep with recently deceased females

Sex is a female resource. Organs are a human resource. I came up with a system that would exchange these resources in a way everybody would benefit. The pussy of females can be used even 2 days after their death. Their sexual resources get wasted with the current system and people often die because there aren't enough organ donors. Incels that are organ donors should be allowed to have sex with recently deceased females. This way female sexual resources would not be wasted even in death. Incels would be encouraged to donate organs and more potential lives would be saved. The incel suffering would be reduced. Nobody would be harmed. The number of organ donors would increase. Nothing would get wasted. It would be like biological and sexual recycling. Female sexual resources would not get wasted and they would be used to help incels. If this proposal came true it would be killing two birds with one stone.

evilwhitemalempire #sexist theantifeminist.com

“Feminists tend to dislike Darwinism almost as much as the evangelical creationist does.”
I can think of at least 4 reasons why:
1) It allows men to understand women better than they understand themselves.
2) They probably resent the implication of Darwinism that emotional ways of thinking are actually more primitive than logic. (That emotions and instinct are really the same thing.)
3) They equally resent the idea that all of that emotional baggage they consider their ‘soul’ can be reduced down to a handful of evolutionary concepts.
4) Most importantly. Darwinian thought has always posed a danger to the ‘woman racket’. Armed with evolutionary psychology who’s going to listen to them when they claim that pornography and prostitution are harmful to women when it’s clear to the enlightened that the only ‘harm’ done to women is to lower their sexual market value enough to force the majority of them to have to work.

Lawful Evil Award

If you want a picture of André du Pôle's vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face - forever.

André du Pôle #elitist #wingnut #psycho #sexist #fundie returnofkings.com

5 Essential Life Lessons From The Hindu Law Code Of Manu

Most ROK readers should find the idea of vocation intuitive. Women have purposes specific to their sex and should not attempt to steal or destroy manly places. However, the caste hierarchy and relative leveling of vocations may seem extraneous to American readers: the US were founded over the idea that neither a centralized Church nor a nobility should exist. Did not the Founding Fathers reject the caste system from the start? Indeed—but I am neither American nor conservative enough to put them on the same footing as sacred texts.

...

A hierarchy where manly men have authority over feminine women works well. Each one has a role fit to its nature and can realize one’s own purposes with the help of the other. An inverted, matriarchal hierarchy where women would rule, on the other hand, is dissatisfying: women would look like caricatures of men by being bossy, let their defects such as conformism and group-thinking tendency express, and turn men into slaves or short-term driven pleasure-seekers. None of the parts would be able to realize its better tendencies, such as loving and caring for women, or meeting with challenges for men.

Likewise, the four-caste hierarchy is the good or fairer one. A society following it and having proper individuals at each level would be the most harmonious one, even in poverty. When the regular order gets messed up, so does the whole society: Kshatriya pretending to spiritual authority start subordinating it to political interests, just as the Protestant princes of Europe did in the sixteenth century; Vaishya pretending to power end up commercializing everything, turning politics into a marketplace where lobbyists and sellouts abound. “Inferior” castes cannot help but bring their essential ethos with them no matter where they go or what they pretend to be.

The lesson, here, could be that modernity has been mostly synonymous with a “vaishya-ization” of society: universities have turned into an academic niche market, politics have become a market as well, and the process have been aggravated by women trying to play men—especially upper bourgeois women pretending to political power. Each “inferior” caste denythe “superior” ones their rights and prerogative have made the world poorer.

As for myself, I have no problem with the idea that some, even men, should not have the right to financial independence: libertarianism may work well among men of Mensa, but a 70-IQ people clearly need some paternalist management not to drown into their own stupidity.

“Even a capable Shudra must not accumulate wealth, for when a Shudra becomes wealthy, he harasses Brahmins.” (10.129) Some wealthy people fund seditious, divisive groups such as BLM, some who enjoy a small authority act like power-tripping small chiefs, some women get beta orbiters and management power— A fair hierarchy is not one with equal chances or opportunities to get promoted, but one where each one can reach his rightful place.
Conclusion

Alt-Right blogger Lawrence Murray contrasted Buddhism, which enjoys some cultural status and association with the upper classes in the West, with an “intensely alien Hinduism.” Practicing yoga, reciting a handful of mantra and mingling with other bourgeois bohemian while sipping fair trade green tea seems indeed easier than vindicating such a frankly non-modern order.

Modernity in general and the so-called American Dream in particular entertain a deep trend of anti-traditional, anti-dharmic thinking which promotes an abstract and formally autonomous individual able to do has he wants. “Gender” or the negation of biological sex in the name of a chosen or psychological sex is but the last product of the trend.

If you could choose between a society where Hillary Clinton had won the election and a society with castes and sacred fires, would you have the guts to choose the second option—knowing that women would be women but also that you may be, say, a Vaishya and thus not entitled to (for example) give a scholarly opinion about what the Bible says?

Whatever your answer, remember that modern ethical theories come and go with the Zeitgeist, whereas dharmic cultures still exist today side by side with modern technology. I could bet anything that in a hundred years the Law Code of Manu will still be studied while Anita Sarkeesian’s name will be forgotten.

Roosh #sexist rooshv.com

Now that the world is rapidly turning against masculinity, it’s time we implement a DEFCOCK alert system to provide objective and standardized information on whether a certain environment is healthy or not for men. Here are the five levels of the DEFCOCK system:
DEFCOCK 5

Completely normal male-female relations in a patriarchal society that believes in a binary gender system of man and woman. Homosexuality is persecuted. Casual sex is difficult (if not impossible). There is no threat of wifing up a former cock carousel rider and then being divorce raped by her. Provider or tribal game is required to land a woman.

Current examples: Iran, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, most Muslim countries
Male safety level: Perfectly safe for men to marry and procreate
DEFCOCK 4

Mostly normal male-female relationships in a fractured patriarchal society that is beginning to accept alternative lifestyles and gender systems, though men are still valued for being masculine and women are valued for being feminine. Casual sex is common but self-limiting. Divorce rates may be high, but there is a low threat of divorce rape. A mixture of provider and clown game is needed.

Current examples: Russia, Ukraine, Turkey, Colombia
Male safety level: Currently safe from an institutional perspective but near-term changes are possible
DEFCOCK 3

Substantial degradation in traditional sex roles where men are beginning to focus on aesthetics, style, and fame seeking. Women have gained masculine traits and delay monogamy to launch a meaningless office career while experimenting with over 25 local and foreign penises to understand how their vaginas respond to various bad boy stimuli. Provider game is beginning to get phased out among women under 30. Some clown game is required in most relationships.

Current examples: Poland, Estonia, Brazil
Male safety level: Great care must be undertaken with female mate selection for marriage; new anti-male legislation is highly likely within 10-year time frame
DEFCOCK 2

Traditional sex roles are actively shamed in major institutions, particularly in the media, academia, and government. Non-heterosexual lifestyles are promoted as superior and major efforts are undertaken to destroy traditional marriage. Campaigns are launched to shame and criminalize consensual sex and masculine behavior such as flirting and bodybuilding. Divorce rape is common, with likelihood of imprisonment for missing alimony payments. Provider game is useless on beautiful women. Clown game is required for all men wanting to get laid.

Current examples: United States, Canada, England, Scandinavia
Male safety level: Unsafe to engage in marriage or reproduction; must screen carefully even for casual sexual encounters; slight danger for normal day-to-day masculine living
DEFCOCK 1

Complete absence of traditional sex roles. Institution of marriage reduced to farce. Severe threat of imprisonment for men displaying heterosexual or masculine behaviors. Roaming witch mobs actively surveil and monitor men who hint at having normal levels of testosterone. Women are elevated to goddess status while straight men appointed as their sexual servants through both legal action and media shaming.

Male safety level: Unsafe to live, fornicate, marry, or procreate; males must immediately vacate area for their own personal safety, both physical and mental

As much as many of you would like to apply DEFCOCK 1 levels to places like London, Washington DC, and Toronto, we are not quite there yet. The next five years will be critical to see if certain DEFCOCK 2 cities slide into DEFCOCK 1, which is absolutely unsuitable for male habitation. If I were to place bets, Toronto will be the first international city to enter DEFCOCK 1. This is likely to happen before 2023.

I left Washington DC, a DEFCOCK 2 location, for my current home in Poland, which recently entered DEFCOCK 3 overall, with a small possibility of entering DEFCOCK 2 in the next ten years. Each man has his own preferential DEFCOCK level that gives him the freedom to pursue sexual relations with women who still look and act like women. It’s obvious to me that DEFCOCK 3 and 4 provide a band of pleasure and happiness for the average man to live life on his own terms while pursuing a variety of relationship types.

It would be great if countries remained static when possessing a favorable DEFCOCK level, but as you’ve seen within your own lifetime, decline is inevitable, and I have not personally witnessed a country improving its DEFCOCK status. The best advice I can give men who don’t want to move every three years is to find a city that is either in DEFCOCK 4 or just recently slipped to DEFCOCK 3, because once a decline accelerates, it may happen too quickly for you to leave before you wake up and see a nuclear cloud in the shape of a vagina right outside your window.

Rodney Hand #sexist theheadofhousehold.com

7 Signs your girlfriend or wife is wearing the pants:

1) You have to ask her to have sex

It has sadly become the status quo that most men have to ask their wives to have sex with them.

Men speak of “getting lucky” with their wives, or their girlfriends “putting out”.

Every time I hear this, it disgusts me to the pit of my stomach – as it should disgust you!

Modern men forget that they have natural common-law conjugal rights, that were only persecuted from the 1970s onwards. In fact marital rape was only established in English law from 1991.

The most insidious part of this status quo is that by asking for sex, men instantly eliminate the #1 component of erotic tension – power.

What happens in a healthy relationship: you screw her at any time and place of your choosing, at your will. The very act of taking her against her will, makes her wet for you immediately.

2) You routinely cook dinner or do the washing up

Many otherwise healthy men routinely cook for their wives. They have been fooled into thinking “I enjoy cooking”, as they attempt to self-rationalise their shameful femininised behaviour.

Think about it from a different perspective. What other, more enjoyable and masculine activities could you be doing whilst your wife is cooking for you? You could be spending the time working on your business and other entrepreneurial activities, earning money! You could be be fixing up those odd jobs around the house that need doing. You could be training martial arts, preparing to defend your family against attackers, or teaching your son the importance of integrity and accountability! Why would a masterful man waste his valuable time in the kitchen?

Take a close look at what your wife is doing whilst you are cooking for her. Is she perhaps watching television – diluting her awareness of life in a sea of pitiful and malignant tripe – or wallowing in a glib and vapid ocean of foolish jibber jabber on Facebook? Or – let me guess – she is at work, or doing something relating to her career. All whilst you fill the traditional female role of staying in the kitchen and cooking food!

Sure, I enjoy cooking from time to time – I am an awesome chef. But I reserve my cooking skills for that rare occasion when I wish to demonstrate my mastery in that skill. My time on a routine basis provides a mu h more valuable return if invested elsewhere.

Don’t fool yourself that you enjoy cooking so much that you sacrifice your valuable time and thus your potential opportunities in life to do it. If that’s the case, become a professional chef. Professional chefs are the only exception to this rule.

What happens in a healthy relationship: the woman does all the cooking and cleaning and constantly looks for ways to improve her cooking to please you.

3) The world revolves around her career

This is a case guaranteed to be all too common!

If a couple has no children, there is no issue with the women having a job. However, this does not mean the entire world should resolve around her and her work!

If a couple have children, the women must put her career on ice until all the children are at school. Then, if she wishes, she can re-enter part time employment.

If the focus of her life is directed towards her job, what energy will she have left for you and the family?

Elevating her ‘career’ onto a special pedestal is the same as saying “I am more important than you”. For a women to prioritise her job is self-serving and narcissistic. By investing all her time in this ‘career’, she is investing all her time in herself.

In the natural world, a woman sacrifices herself for the long-term benefit of her family. She deploys her natural nurturing and care-giving instincts, for the betterment of the bloodline.

What happens in a healthy relationship: if the women works, it is a distant last-place to the needs of the family. Her world revolves around you and she loves it.

4) She expects you to follow her orders

I see it day after day. When you remove the veil from your eyes and behold the truth, you will see it too.

Men walking in the supermarket, as if on leashes. Their wives walk them as if dogs.

Whilst you unwittingly entered the relationship placing your trust in the theory of “equal rights”, the practice is far different. Women will rush to fill the power vacuum left in the absence of your natural male dominance and will literally begin to tell you what to do. It may start slowly, but it is a rapidly descending slope.

This may come in the form of direct orders, or dominantly phrased rhetoric questions, e.g., “Could you go and do this for me, honey?”

The reality is that women want to be told what to do and if you assert yourself as a good husband in this regard, she will be happier than ever before.

What happens in a healthy relationship: she does exactly as you tell her to do and if she needs something of you she requests it politely and respectfully.

5) She continually nags you

There is nothing more insidious in a women than nagging. This is exactly why men must spank their wives, to combat such emasculating and rude behaviour.

The media has steadily fed men the lie that “nagging” is somehow natural and expected. We have been programmed to believe that a wife is naturally a ‘ball and chain’ that will constantly ‘nag’ her foolish husband, who is ‘deserving’ of this derision. The implication is that the husband is weak and is being justly apprehended by his wife for this fact.

In fact, the complete opposite is true. A man takes the lead in providing for his family and his wife is there to offer her every assistance to him. A good wife is like her husband’s Personal Assistant and should be continually thinking of ways she can help to drive forward the direction that the man has set for the family.

What happens in a healthy relationship: she continually supports your every effort with practical assistance where she can

6) She talks down to you

This can start so slowly that many men do not even realise it is happening.

What would be gasped at 50 years ago as unforgivable petulance and disrespect, is now routinely acknowledged as expected behaviour.

The situation is compounded by subliminal programming from the media, where men are portrayed as buffoons and women as heroes. I stopped listening to the radio or watching the TV a long time ago. Next time you are watching some ghastly shite via these mediums, pay close attention to the dynamic between male and female co-presenters. Chances are, the women openly mocks the man, deriding him and reducing him to an emasculated caricature of a true male.

Many men are so used to being on the receiving end of this disgusting behaviour, that it may come as a shock to them to find that a true woman does exactly the opposite. Rather than talking down to her man, she praises his leadership and valuable male characteristics. She looks upto him and regularly reminds him of what a great job he does providing for her and the family.

Can you imagine what you would be capable of with a women like this behind you?

This is still the norm in non-Westernised cultures such as Singapore and India.

What happens in a healthy relationship: she lovingly praises and supports you, like your own personal cheer leader.

7) She won’t allow you to make decisions

One of a man’s most fundamental roles in a relationship is as the decision maker. He is entrusted to consider the greater good of the family. He is entrusted to follow his instincts for the long-term prosperity and survival of his bloodline. Whilst a man may often seek his woman’s input or guidance on major life decisions, ultimately the decision is his.

By claiming ‘veto’ rights on the basis of an ‘equal relationship’ where “everybody contributes the same”, the sly women establishes an unhealthy power framework where she has eroded the man’s most fundamental and valuable contribution to the relationship. A relationship is not a jury or a council committee, where votes are taken. A relationship is an exchange of power and resources, based on agreed terms.

Millions of modern men are living unhappy and emasculated lives, as they have naively forfeited one of the principal tenets of their masculinity: the ability to lead and direct a family.

The truth is that a good women wants to be lead by a good husband and will trust in him to make good decisions.

What happens in a healthy relationship: the man makes the decisions, based on his strategic direction for the family and in consultation with his women where he deems fit.

David J. Stewart #sexist jesus-is-savior.com

Fathers are our society's true heroes, yet the liberals belittle men and portray fathers in television programs and commercials as being stupid, incompetent and destructive (e.g., Family Guy and The Simpsons). Fathers don't receive enough due praise from their wives, children or from society itself. Children often raise their voice at fathers in primetime TV programs. Children are seen sassing dad, calling him an idiot, slamming the door in his face while he is talking. During this blatant disrespect for fathers and husbands, the sound of an audience laughing is heard in the background. Television viewers hear people laughing while a father has a door slammed in his face, or is rebuked by a little sarcastic brat. If this happened in real life, a good parent would take off their belt and lovingly beat some fear into that child. I'm not talking about child abuse. I don't approve of any kind of abuse. I believe God put that padded area in the back of every human being for a reason, and that reason is for spankings! Proper spankings never hurt any child!!!

Anonymous Anonymous #sexist blogger.com

I just add this 4 all the feminist motherfukers:

Here the way to go: if she can bleed, she can breed. (yeah, your OWN little princess, precisely)

@ eivind: about rape you were right 8 years ago and you are now even more.

Allah Hafiz.

Alia_Harkonnen #sexist reddit.com

"You fantasize about violence? Get help"

But rape fantasies are just fantasies, they don't mean she wants to be raped. Chad doesn't really want to choke her and rape her like shes a worthless whore, it's just his kink, don't kink shame. But jerk off thinking about choking some duckfaced bitch who is offering the world full view of her cunt for attention, or ... well, I don't want to go there and get reported and banned for inciting violence, right?

I don't know what you kink positive people think our fantasies are. You lectured us about consent and all the nasty shit woman wants done to her by a man she can trust (never mind the paradox), being sex positive is so great but only if you're having sex. Then go ahead and be violent as long as someone lets you. Vent about unfulfilled fantasies on some forum, you belong on FBI watch list.

You know what's the difference, the fantasies we share don't come with the "SO" social approval stamp on them. Take all our posts, add "and my gf is so into it", post them on r/normiesnbraggingabouthavingsexanditsnotvanilla and normies won't shut up about all the ways they like to degrade themselves or the other with abundance of obligatory advice on how to "spice it up."

But a sick fuck doesn't fuck, lock him up into an asylum before he makes another post that violates innocent normal men and women who just happened to be here by accident expecting to see r/aww material.

imluvd #fundie #homophobia #sexist christianforums.com

LOL!!! I didn't give my sentence any thought. Where in the bible was any woman forced to marry a man that raped her? If she was raped in the city, but no one heard her scream, then they where both stoned. If she was rape out in the country then only he was stoned.

And actually in most countries I have never known a woman to be forced to marry a rapist, but was instead killed, whether she screamed or not. Man is the one who changed God's laws and did what they wanted.

And to go as far out as the rest here. Then I guess we shouldn't be punishing child molesters either. I mean to go by everyone's arguement, he/she can't help it that they are attracted to children, is it right for God to punish him/her to a life of lonliness, condemnation, and after all they may have been born that way. I mean after all there are a lot of homosexual men who molest young boys after all. And I did say a lot, not all. So you are telling me that it is unfair for God to demand celibacy for these people, because he made them have this unfair attraction? LOL!!! I mean this is what you people are trying to tell everyone about homosexuals, that they can't choose to be different and it is unfair to expect them to remain celibate. I know the above is ridiculous, but so is the homosexual arguement and the arguement for fornication. You choose to follow your lust plain and simple, just like anyone does to follow any sin they choose to do. You can justify these lies all you want, but the bottom line is what does God Word say and do you believe it?

David J. Stewart Award

Behold! A proud member of the Rape Culture!

Sydney Allan Markland #sexist ibtimes.co.uk

A Florida man accused of sexually battering an eight-year-old girl allegedly told detectives it was her fault for "wearing provocative clothing".

Sydney Allan Markland, 68, is accused of sexually assaulting the child, who knew him, at his home in Ocala, Marion County, in July last year.
After the assault, Markland "told [the victim] not to tell anyone, kissed her on the cheek and read from the Bible" according to a detective report.

Markland was a well known member of the community, often called "Dread" because of his hair style. One neighbour described him as man who "knows the Bible and preaches it inside out".

Police claim that Markland admitted to the assault and offered two separate lines of defence: first, that such actions were permissible in his "culture" and, second, that she had encouraged the sexual contact.

"She was wearing provocative clothing," Markland told detectives, according to their report. "Her actions suggested that she was consenting to sexual contact."

Andrew Anglin #psycho #wingnut #sexist #racist #homophobia dailystormer.name

[From the article "7 Creative Uses for Right-Wing Death Squads in America"]

As we know, Donald Trump is going to be the law and order president.

We also know that he recently praised Rody Duterte for his campaign of using Right-Wing Death Squads to slaughter drug dealers and addicts on the streets.

Republicans are hoping that the President will implement a similar program here in America to clean up the streets.

However, RWDS have many uses beyond just eliminating drugs from society.

7. Artists and Musicians

No one is more deserving of the old “double tap” than degenerate artists and musicians who are degrading our society with corrosive filth.

Passing laws to outlaw obscenity and blasphemy would be time consuming and expensive. But such laws would not be needed if everyone committing these acts turned up dead on the street with signs around their necks reading “mammon.”

6. Filthy Sluts

One of the greatest challenges America is facing is filthy, lying sluts, who would just as soon have sex with a random black guy in a gas station bathroom as play a puzzle game on their cellphone. There is no group of people more deserving of swift and rapid extermination.

President Trump could send a decisive message about American Christian values by releasing RWDS on these dirty whores. Women would then think twice before spreading their legs, and instead return to the kitchen and shut their lying whore mouths.

5. Liberal University Professors

Youth today is sick and degenerate. Arguably, the biggest contributor to this is the liberal university elite.

Sending in the military to shut down universities, arrest everyone and restructure by putting people from the internet in charge would be costly and time consuming. A quick fix with permanent results would be to target the most extreme offenders and let the rest of them know that they’d better clean up their act and stop turning our kids into communists.

4. Legal Immigrants

President Trump will have no problem removing illegal immigrants. However, through fraud, the Jews have brought in many, many brown sludge “people” through “legal” means. These people are harder to get rid of, as changing laws can be boring and time consuming.

It is hard to legally deport a person with legal status to be in the country, but you know what isn’t hard to deport? A bullet-riddled corpse. You can deport it six feet under ground with nothing more than a shovel and some elbow grease.

3. Human Rights Activists

Whinorities, feminists, homosexuals and vegans have been a thorn in the side of great men for generations with their disgusting street protests. This issue has reached fever pitch as of late with these whining scumbags blocking traffic and making people late for work.

If human rights activist leaders get rode up on by a man on a Kawasaki with a Glock 18 on their way out of the co-opt, no one is going to cry for them other than those who were already crying about something else.

2. Political Opponents

One of the biggest problems in politics is that other politicians sometimes disagree with your political decisions and try to stop your agenda. The thing is, they can’t disagree if they’re lying in the gutter filled with .40 caliber hollowpoints.

A smart usage of RWDS against political opponents could make President Trump’s sailing a whole lot smoother.

1. Lying Journalists

There is no bigger threat to freedom than lying journalists. These diabolical rascals threaten to upend the entire social order with their filthy lies.

But of course, suing them is time-consuming and expensive, even after we open-up the libel laws. Thankfully, a quicker solution exists with RWDS.

Editor’s note: This is in no way a call for violence or murder. This is a policy position paper in the form of a listicle. The Daily Stormer is opposed to violence, and simply supports the practical implementation of innovative policies which will lead to a great America.

Anonymous #sexist eivindberge.blogspot.no

Anon, all men are "hebephiles" by default, it is very unlikely that a man is not sexually or emotionally attracted to a pubescent, in fact if a man tells me he has never been attracted to a well-formed 12-years-old I simply do not believe he, it is not a rare specific attraction like children

David J. Stewart #fundie #sexist jesusisprecious.org

You women who wear pants, why don't you decide to become a lady who honors the Lord Jesus Christ by wearing a dress? People automatically associate a woman in a modest dress with virtue, chastity and decency. I'd rather turn a man's head for the right reason ladies. It's better that a man take a second glance at you because he is impressed that you are dressed effeminately, than to glance twice to lust upon your unclothed whorish body. You must answer to God for every lust caused by your indecent apparel. Think about that! Many saved women won't have any rewards in Heaven, because of their revealing clothing. God knows your heart and why you dress the way you do. You cannot fool God.

And you men who are comfortable drinking your liquid devil (booze) and smoking your cancer sticks, you need to get rid of that junk and live for Jesus!!! I thank God that I've never smoked one cigarette or drank one sip of beer. Praise God! I've got my faults, but self-destruction is not one of them.

Feminist Scum #sexist #psycho feministscum.blogspot.com

Wow, it's been a while since I last posted on my blog. I guess it's because I usually air all of my opinions on forums these days, or at least I did until I left one.

Anyways, I'm going to post a short article, or list if you will, about something I believe. You may not like them, and I'm willing to accept they may not be accurate. I am not married to these opinions, and they will most likely change over time.

- I believe men are better than women. I believe they are better because they are bigger, stronger, faster, are 4 iq points more intelligent than average, and continue to out perform women at so many different things.

- I believe that if a woman threatens your freedom by setting state thugs after you to kidnap you from your home, and throw you behind bars, then you have every moral right to make that woman fear for her own life to protect your self.

- I believe that the patriarchy is the natural order, and that men should keep women in line. If women do not like this, then they have the right to choose not to be involved with the patriarch.

- I believe you should slap a woman if they are out of control, and won't leave you alone. I do not think this power should be abused.

- I believe women should not be allowed to vote. Women never earned the right to vote like men, they simply bitched for it. Manginas seeing a way to keep power, gave them the right. It should be taken away from them until they can earn it properly

Robert T. Lee #fundie #homophobia #forced-birth #sexist #wingnut tencommandments.org

What the heathen Statue of Liberty really means


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Freedom to seek asylum in America from the rightful stigmatization of true criminality in other nations

Freedom to practice homosexuality or lesbianism

Freedom to murder innocent human embryos and fetuses

Freedom to publicly blaspheme God

Freedom to worship satan (Note: we do not capitalize the word satan even when it begins a sentence).

Freedom to practice obstetrics and gynecology as a male physician

Freedom to make and sell pornography

Freedom from the death penalty for death-worthy crimes

Freedom to abandon children to daycare and public schools while seeking the fleeting American dream.

Freedom to make a living off foolish, vain and immoral employment.

Freedom to abandon parents to nursing homes.

Freedom to wrongly serve in government as homosexuals, lesbians and other high criminals.

Freedom for women to foolishly seek to be equal with men.

Freedom to foolishly petition the government for immoral interests.

Freedom to receive food stamps, veteran benefits and other federal financial benefits while a criminal or muderer in prison.

Freedom to elect moral criminals such as homosexuals, lebians, murderers, robbers and other criminals to government positions.

Freedom to make heroes and celebrities out of deathworthy criminals.

Freedom to sell and purchase crime tools and art of muderers.

Freedom to produce and make megabucks off violent and murderous video games, toys, movies and music in order to teach children how to become violent and murderers.

Elliot Rodger #sexist #psycho latimes.com

(Transcript of the last video from the shooter at UC Santa Barbara)

Hi, Elliot Rodger here.

Well— this is my last video. It all has to come to this.

Tomorrow is the day of retribution. The day in which I will have my revenge against humanity. Against all of you.

For the last 8 years of my life, ever since I’ve hit puberty, I’ve been forced to endure an existence of loneliness, rejection, and unfulfilled desires. All because girls have never been attracted to me.

Girls gave their affection, and sex, and love, to other men but never to me.

I’m 22 years old and I’m still a virgin. I’ve never even kissed a girl.

I’ve been through college for two and a half years, more than that actually, and I’m still a virgin.

It has been very torturous.

College is the time when everyone experiences those things such as sex, and fun, and pleasure. But in those years I’ve had to rot in loneliness.

It’s not fair. You girls have never been attracted to me.

I don’t know why you girls aren’t attracted to me, but I will punish you all for it.

It’s an injustice, a crime, because I don’t know what you don’t see in me. I’m the perfect guy, and yet you throw yourselves at all these obnoxious men, instead of me, the supreme gentlemen.

I will punish all of you for it. (laughs)

On the day of retribution I am going to enter the hottest sorority house of UCSB— and I will slaughter every single spoiled, stuck-up, blonde slut I see inside there.

All those girls that I’ve desired so much, they would’ve all rejected me and looked down upon me as an inferior man if I ever made a sexual advance towards them while they throw themselves at these obnoxious brutes.

I will take great pleasure in slaughtering all of you.

You will finally see that I am in truth the superior one. The true alpha male. (laughs)

Yes, after I’ve annihilated every single girl in the sorority house, I’ll take to the streets of Isla Vista, and slay every single person I see there.

All those popular kids who live such lives of hedonistic pleasure while I’ve had to rot in loneliness for all these years, they’ve all looked down upon me every time I try to go out and join them. They’ve all treated me like a mouse.

Well now, I will be a God compared to you. You will all be animals. You are animals, and I will slaughter you like animals. I will be a God, exacting my retribution, on all those who deserve it.

And you do deserve it, just for the crime of living a better life than me.

All you popular kids. You’ve never accepted me, and now you’ll all pay for it.

And girls, all I’ve ever wanted was to love you, and to be loved by you. I’ve wanted a girlfriend, I’ve wanted sex, I’ve wanted love, affection, adoration, but you think I’m unworthy of it.

That’s a crime that can never be forgiven.

If I can’t have you, girls, I will destroy you. (laughs)

You denied me a happy life, and in turn, I will deny all of you life. (laughs) It’s only fair.

I hate all of you, humanity is a disgusting, wretched, depraved species. If I had it in my power, I would stop at nothing, to reduce every single one of you to mountains of skulls and rivers of blood, and rightfully so.

You deserve to be annihilated. And I’ll give that to you.

You never showed me any mercy, and so I will show you none. (laughs)

You force me to suffer all my life, and now I’ll make you all suffer.

I’ve waited a long time for this.

I’ll give you exactly what you deserve.

lioninoil #fundie #homophobia #sexist christianforums.com

[Have u ever found something in the bible that u didn't like?]

When you find something in the Bible that you don't like, most likely it's the Holy Spirit convicting YOU on something which is going on in YOUR life.

Homosexuals don't like Leviticus 18 and 20, Romans 1, 1 Corinthians 5 or 6, or Jude -- and yet, homosexuals know intuitively that their choice of lifestyle is WRONG, that it is SINFUL, and the Holy Spirit is trying to convict them to get them to repent of their homosexuality and move back to normal, God-given heterosexuality.

Women, particularly feminist women, don't like 1 Corinthians 14 or 1 Timothy 2 which forbids women from speaking in churches, teaching in churches, or having any authority over men -- and yet, women know intuitively that God created Adam FIRST, THEN Eve from Adam; that God came to earth as a male (not a female), and the natural order is God - husband - wife - children. This exists all throughout nature and also in all human societies. Dogs and cats know this. Horses and cows know this. All of animalkind accepts this -- except humans, who think they have the right to go against God's Natural Order where women are "equal" to men. Christ grants a degree of equality to women, but women have their own sphere of influence just as men have their own sphere.

Yes indeed - when we don't like a part of the Bible, it's usually because the Holy Spirit is working on something in us which GOD doesn't like!

GOD'S LAW IS CLEAR -- THE PENALTY SEVERE!!!

The National Fatwa Council (Malaysia) #fundie #sexist #homophobia news24.com

Kuala Lumpur - One of Malaysia's highest Islamic bodies has banned females from dressing or behaving like men and engaging in lesbian sex, saying it was forbidden by the religion.

The National Fatwa Council late on Thursday issued its ruling following a two-day meeting that discussed recent cases of young women apparently behaving like men and exhibiting homosexual tendencies, state news agency Bernama reported.

Council chairperson Abdul Shukor Husin told Bernama many young women admired the way men dress, behave and socialise, violating human nature and denying their femininity.

"It is unacceptable to see women who love the male lifestyle including dressing in the clothes men wear," Abdul Shukor was quoted as saying.

"(Masculine behaviour) becomes clearer when they start to have sex with someone of the same gender, that is woman and woman," he said.

"In view of this, the National Fatwa Council which met today have decided and taken the stand that such acts are forbidden and banned," he said.

Male homosexuality, considered against the order of nature, is illegal in Malaysia but lawyers say female homosexuality is technically permissible as there are no provisions for it under the law.

Jim #fundie #sexist blog.reaction.la

Calvinism in New England was scorned by the heresy of Unitarianism, which deemed itself holier, but Unitarianism only lasted about a generation before it collapsed into Emersonian subjectivist Transcendentalism, which then swiftly (in less than a generation) collapsed into politics (abolition, feminism etc).

If we look at the New Testament position on slavery it is of course passivist and pacifist. Christians are encouraged, but not required, to free their slaves. Slaves are discouraged from rebelling and running away. Masters are required to be benevolent.

What happened when many Christian Churches adopted an activist position on slavery, a clearly heretical position on slavery?

An activist position on slavery requires war. War requires dreadful means, requires lies, terror, murder, and artificial famine – all in an undeniably good cause, of course.

Lo and behold, those churches that adopted an activist position against slavery ceased to be Christian. So that heresy, quite predictably, turned deadly.

But, once anti slavery became the law of the land, then a good Christian should of course support that law, so anti slavery did not destroy Christianity.

But now, however pretty much all Churches, have adopted the modern marriage vows, implying a clearly heretical position on marriage, which vows undermine and disrupt marriage, which in turn results in preaching that is fundamentally hostile to marriage as a binding contract.

Equality requires fences, that is to say, requires the dissolution of marriage. An actually functioning marriage is always patriarchal. Show me a man who picks up fifty percent of the socks, and I will show you a man who sleeps on the couch, while once a week or so his wife’s lover drops in to rough her up and take her money.

A genuinely Christian Church can no more support modern marriage, than it could support holy war on slavery. In so doing, is necessarily holier than Jesus, and so, runs through unitarianism to vagueness to leftism, and the Church building is remodeled to become a left wing bookstore.

The modern position on wedding vows is leading to pretty much the same consequences as the activist position on slavery did.

Ewoolutionary Psychopathy Award

You fail everything forever.

Jim #sexist blog.reaction.la

Doubtless you have heard of the recent Idaho gang rape.

This was Islamic Rape Jihad, not just Muslim rapists, because the girl was five, because the boys put it on video, because the boys expected the support of their community, and because the boys received the support of their community.
You
Feminist response to this rape shows what feminists really want. Everyone reacting to this in an indignant manner is a male who is in favor of patriarchy to a greater or lesser extent, and many of them want to completely reverse female emancipation.

In the ancestral environment, and indeed today’s environment, if a woman was property the way a cow is property, she was likely to have substantially greater reproductive success than a free woman. If a man was property the way a cow is property, likely to have zero reproductive success.

In the ancestral environment, as today, male slaves don’t reproduce. Female slaves generally outreproduce free women. Thus the optimal strategy for a woman is to provoke until provocation results in enslavement.

The evolutionary optimal strategy for a female, in the ancestral environment, and in our present day environment, is to act in ways that gets the west conquered by Islamic State. If free, likely to have 1.5 children, and similarly her grandchildren, rapidly resulting in the total disappearance of her genes. If her menfolk are conquered and she is sold naked in chains on the auction block by Islamic state, likely to have six or seven children.

Optimal reproductive strategy for a woman is to be captured by a man who owns her much as he owns a cow and can do anything to her he could do to a cow. The optimal reproductive strategy for her owner is to treat her considerably better than he treats his cows, but the less he has power to do bad things to her, the more it is in his interests to do bad things to her. For a free woman, the stable strategy is defect/defect, for the woman to defect by serial monogamy, for the woman to spend her hottest and most fertile years continually trying to trade up to a higher status male or better place on some other male’s booty call list, and for a male to defect by keeping as many women as possible on his booty call list, to spin as many plates as possible, without investing in any of them. For a slave, because the slave cannot defect, because the slave is guaranteed to play cooperate, cooperate is also a good move for the male owner of a female slave, because he has a biological interest in the welfare of her children. He is free to impose cooperate/defect on her, but that is not actually all that much in his biological interest, which biological interest manifests in the tendency of men to love and care for women that they regularly have sex with, provided that they believe those women are not having sex with other men.

Feminist demands for emancipation ever escalate, no matter how extraordinary the privilege women are granted, because they are pushing for someone strong enough to master them. In the ancestral environment, free women were unsuccessful at reproducing, because prisoner’s dilemma. That she can defect on a man guarantees defect/defect, guarantees that he will try to defect before she does – giving her no care, protection, or support, keeping as many plates spinning as he can, so they look for someone powerful enough to stop them from defecting. Slave women will generally outreproduce free women, because he who owns a woman absolutely has incentive to invest in her and her children. Similarly, cows are numerous, their wild ancestors are generally extinct. If animal liberationists liberate chickens and cows, there are not going to be very many chickens or cows. If the People’s Popular Committee for Food Abundance tells the farmer he does not own his land and his crops, there is going to be crop failure.

And feminists, in supporting Rape Jihad, are unconsciously pursuing their optimal evolutionary reproductive strategy, which is to be sold by Islamic state naked in chains on the auction block. We are descended from free men and unfree women. Peoples, nations religions, cultures and groups with strong, proud, free, and independent women died out. They always die out.

Female emancipation is a shit test that we failed. Feminists support Rape Jihad because they are unconsciously looking for men who will pass their shit test.

LOL GUTTER SLUT AZN WOMEN, JUST LOL #sexist xoxohth.com

physically, she is small, weak, slender, hairless, with perky tits and round ass, built like a little sex doll for a white man to pound and unload his semen into. even if you're not an ephebophile by nature, you will find yourself beginning to think like one as you grow to appreciate how soft and childlike her supple body is next to your hairy and well muscled form, and how nice and easy it is to dominate her in bed and toss her around like a rag doll.

looking into the cute almond eyes that adorn her silly pancake face, you can read a kind of submissive devotion. the alienness of the oriental features, the minimalism of that nose bridge, the femininity of those hairless and scentless limbs - you feel captivated by this race of women that is so repulsively unlike you, yet so eager to tease and pleasure you, and you become tremendously aroused by this set of circumstances, for you feel like a king.

mentally, she is inexperienced and naive about the world, naive about leading a feminist lifestyle although she may know its tenets. she is also introverted and shy, naturally intelligent yet submissive, eager to please because you are her first white man and that means a lot to her, and overall very self-conscious of her race and its position.

her frame of reference is literally a 5'5" spiky haired asian nerd with 4 inch penis. she will be so grateful that you are a 5'8" white guy with 5 inch penis that she will practically not see any difference between that and porn star proportions, because all she can discern is that you are huge and packing.
she's accustomed to scrawny family members and asian friends with bowl cuts, so if you play in a sports league with friends you will seem like a thrilling alpha sports star. if you're 5'10" she will think you're a muscle man. if you dress reasonably well, she will feel like a village girl invited to be a princess. if you have blonde hair and blue eyes, she will call you ryan gosling in front of her friends as her pussy gushes at the aryan ideal.
over the years she has been trained to differentiate between the asian and white guys, but not so much between different types of white men, so it's unlikely for her to run off with another white man for trivial or whimsical reasons. as a chinky outsider, she will be naive to many of your personal flaws, she will have lower standards, and she will be unable to parse the social inadequacies that a white girl would easily pick up on. in sum, you have more slack with her than with any girl you have had previously.

any time she notices a difference between asian and white races, such comparisons will inevitably run in favor of the white. as the white boyfriend, you will automatically benefit from the broad generalizing racial judgments that result from these frequent outbursts of neurotic self-hatred. your sexy asian girlfriend has a chip on her shoulder and will vent about race a lot. realize that this is mostly to impress you. pat her on the head and remind her that you are the white guy (not the bad guy). it keeps her content, and grateful.

you can get away with doing degrading things to her because although she puts up a front like she's a feminist and sick of white guys with yellow fever, in reality she loves to take abuse because she believes wholeheartedly in white superiority and feels most poignantly the inferiority of her own race. remember that this is a girl who has been obsessed with being owned and bred by a superior race of men since she was a 70 lb. middle school girl who had just talked to a white boy for the first time in her life. she's shared these fantasies with her asian female friends, and even announced them around asian guys and adults, with the corollary that a full asian baby would be runty and undesirable and below what she knows she deserves. this is a girl who knows what she wants, and what she wants is your penis in order to have your seed, your seed in order to have a half-white baby, and that baby for the eugenics of her line and the purification of her womb. she admires you as more than just a man, but as the benefactor of her future children, as the ticket to interracial bliss and her acceptance into a higher, white society. you better believe that, at this point, she has conditioned herself to love the white man, to be caring and nurturing and supportive of the white man, to make him happy and satisfy his needs no matter what.

finally, by dating a white man, she is proudly rejecting her own race, and this is wonderfully good for you. it eliminates or smooths over usual lines of conflict. now you two have something that binds you together, that transcends petty squabbles and usual couples' issues. it frames your relationship in a grander context and gives it a special narrative. the narrative is that she is fleeing her oppressive native culture, hounded by hateful asian men who feel entitled to enslave her, and you are her white knight savior who has dedicated his time to making everything right. this legitimates your feelings of lust when you're pounding her in the ass and she's squealing like a hello kitty toy. this makes you feel bigger and stronger than you normally would when manhandling a petite girl whose utmost desire is to please you. this makes you feel good about yourself, righteous even, and entitles you to make derisive statements about a whole group of people that you have long felt to be beneath your kind - asians. because you know, you know what it means to save a precious asian girl from that sinister race, and you know how it feels to sweep her up in your strong white arms as she mews appreciatively about your bravado and how different you are from every asian guy she's met. now you can indulge in your asian fantasies with this heroic twist and it makes your penis feel so BIG. heck, life's too short to live any other way.

caamib #sexist #senpai_noticed_us holocaust21.wordpress.com

Those FSTDT freaks are some of the lowest life forms on the planet. They’re not even freaks as this would imply that they’re human beings. Notice how neither one of these monsters even considers that the allegations might have been untrue and just consider it a given that he did it end of story. And then their simpleton way of viewing things that could hurt you only shared with chimps. Knife stabbing – bad. Sexual harassment allegations? Not so bad. What morons ! I’d much rather prefer to be stabbed in some situations than get such accusations, as would most men. But no, to them it’s just a given that stabbing, no matter the circumstances, if worse, and if you’re accused of sexual harassment it’s a given you’re guilty. What vile, ugly, disgusting bunch of shiteating maggots they are.
Reply

e_i-2 #sexist #psycho #dunning-kruger love-shy.com

And what is that difference? Interestingly I'm actually discussing rape with another new poster as well. . . since the difference between rape and domination is 'consent', what gives consent? Attraction, just with animals and their mating rituals of sexual display - if you are attractive, good sperm, then it's not rape.

John Sullivan #homophobia #sexist gaystarnews.com

John Sullivan, a UK councillor candidate congratulated Russia on banning gay Pride marches and claimed regular exercise in schools can prevent homosexuality.

In a series of Facebook posts, Sullivan, who is a member of the United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP) likened gay activists to termites and stated that feminism is evil and being gay is even worse.

In one post Sullivan suggested regular physical exercise prevents children from becoming gay.

He recommended Victorian style regular physical exercise be reinstated in schools as it apparently causes releases of tension which prevents homosexuality.

Sullivan also went on to call gay marriage supporters 'termites' mockingly reacting to an article on Conservative party members supporting marriage equality.

His antagonism doesn’t stop there, he also claimed feminism is evil, suggesting that homosexuality is even worse (saying 'it doesn't go there').

John #wingnut #homophobia #sexist news.yahoo.com

I am amazed by the number of liberals who understand how the natural environment is interconnected and that all events have innumerable repercussions, most of them impossible to predict, and who appear completely unable to understand that the same principles apply to the social environment. If the social environment is radically altered, as it will be with the acceptance of the idea that homosexuality is equal to heterosexuality, widespread and fundamental changes with unpredictable repercussions will follow, yet so many rush heedlessly ahead. As with emitting CO2 in the natural environment, often the act that will radically alter the environment appears harmless at first glance. But unlike the situation with CO2, no one in academia, Hollywood, or mainstream journalism will alert the public of the dangers, lest they be blackballed. 

Since humans evolved in small groups, the construction of large, self-sustaining societies that provided well for the welfare of the members has been difficult and has quite often led to failure. Any large society we construct will likely be quite fragile, like a house of cards. The adoption of same-sex marriage throughout a society would be akin to simultaneously pulling out a great many cards in this fragile structure. 
One of the key elements in this fragile structure is the duty to protect or care for other members of the society. This obligation originates with the duty that all men have had historically to protect all women in the society and the corresponding duty of women to nurture all men. This has always made men feel obligated to and connected to all the women in the society and the women to the men. Reducing traditional gender roles has eroded the strength of this feeling of duty, but it can still persist as long as men feel an attraction to women and women to men. However, with equating homosexuality with heterosexuality, the universality of opposite sex attraction is eliminated, this duty vanishes, and the society is atomized. 

Liberals often claim that preferences for gender roles and heterosexuality are socially constructed, when it appears clear that biological differences developed from millions of years of evolution across the great majority of species explain the gender roles and the predominance of heterosexuality, while the beliefs that the genders are the same and that homosexuality is the equal of heterosexuality are completely socially constructed, in a somewhat Orwellian fashion. This Orwellian crusade resembles the efforts of alchemists of a bygone era who tried to alter what they did not understand. These modern crusaders will likely be about as successful as alchemists, but with far more tragic consequences. This crusade also brings to mind Mao’s Cultural Revolution, where people were deemed to be equal in ability and suitability to tasks regardless of their actual situation, and retribution was swift toward anyone who questioned this.

Given that lesbianism is rising rapidly among the lower socioeconomic classes, it’s probable that life will soon become hellish for most non-elite men, who will be lonely and lost, and that the middle class will disappear among a rising tide of violence, crime, poverty, and homelessness. This will terminate the social contract for young men, as they will no longer be assured of love, marriage, and children even if they work hard and follow all the rules, and many of them are likely to feel isolated and become alienated. I wouldn’t be surprised if a great many become antisocial and even violent, and I suspect that more than a few will go on shooting sprees. 

Political/legal systems are mostly arbitrary, while the laws of nature are not, implying that a political system delegitimizes itself, not nature, when it arbitrarily imposes an unhealthy and unnatural form of equality.

Mack Major #fundie #homophobia #sexist edendecoded.com

The rise of homosexuality, promiscuity, gang violence, fatherlessness, lesbianism and single motherhood within the African-American community is directly attributed to GODDESS WORSHIP.

When you watch porn, you're unwittingly engaging in goddess worship. You're subjecting yourself to the worship of Cerces: Mama Wata: Yemonja. (I will use these names interchangeably throughout this article).

This is why in all porn movies (gay porn being the exception), the woman is always the starring attraction. Everything centers around her. This is because Mama Wata operates through goddess sensuality. The porn industry itself is highly occult in nature: and its purpose is to make money off people while opening them up for demonic visitation and infiltration through sex.

Here's something else to consider: Notice how whenever people - particularly women - get near a beach or some other body of water, they tend to want to get almost naked? Why the desire to show one's body so openly to others, specifically around water?

My contention is that the spirit of Yemonja is behind it. This demon is also behind the whole strong-independent-single mother phenomenon among many black women in the United States today. Most single black mothers and their children are under the powerful control of this marine spirit.

Yemonja is also behind the rise of homosexuality and lesbianism among so many black Americans. This is the goddess of single mothers, fatherless kids, female sensuality and weak effeminate men.

When a person enters into a covenant with this spirit, the children of the single mother becomes the property of Mama Wata.

To secure worship from them, this spirit leads the children into becoming emotionally-driven or effeminate males (if they're sons), and sexually promiscuous and domineering females (if they're daughters).

Mama Wata has specific colors that are worn by her more open followers. Those colors are aquamarine blue and sea green. Have you noticed a proliferation of women (and effeminate guys) dyeing their hair those exact same colors lately?

Sea shells worn as jewelry and hair adornments are another tell-tale sign of this spirit's direct influence within society today. This is because Mama Wata/Yemonja is known as the water spirit, meaning it is believed to dwell in or has its base of operation within bodies of water.

Mama Wata is personified as a mermaid spirit.

How does one enter into a covenant with this demonic creature? It mainly happens through sex! Particularly through engaging in fornication, adultery, masturbation, watching porn, visiting strip clubs, watching strippers and homosexual acts. Sex is the initiation ritual that brings one into covenant agreement with Mama Wata.

I've been warning you for some time that sexual sin is nothing to play around with! It's never just harmless pleasure. That's what this demon wants you to think, to make it easier to gain control over your life. When you have sex outside of wedlock, you are forming a covenant with demons.

This is the one big secret that witches and those given over to the occult do NOT want you to understand. They initiate others into the occult through having sex with them: including CHRISTIANS!

Many of you don't realize it: but this demonic spirit is the very reason why so many of you struggle to get into a relationship that's worth having.

It's also one of the main demonic principalities behind the high crime, incarceration and murder rates among African-American males. It's behind the gang confederacy in Chicago known as Folk Nation, which includes the GD, Black Gangster Disciples and the Latin Disciples. They use those colors because those are Mama Watas colors! These gangs are responsible for a large portion of the violent murders that has plagued Chicago's black and Latino communities in recent times.

Yemonja will always seek to claim her children back: even if it's by death. And it's the reason behind so many men being unable to find financial security or to maintain gainful employment.

All these are negative side effects of making covenants with demons.

Sidenote: All attempts at black unity and upliftment will fail miserably unless this demon principality is dealt with first. We cannot solve our physical problems until we first conquer our spiritual nemesis.

Many of you are yoked to Mama Wata, whether intentionally or not. And now you must get unyoked. Only the mighty power of Jesus Christ can set you free.

To combat this notorious demon, a person needs to give their full heart and allegiance to Jesus Christ. The sinful lifestyle needs to be completely abandoned without reservation. One needs to be baptized in water. And they need to seek God for the baptism and in filling of the Holy Ghost.

Qoeleth #homophobia #sexist forums.catholic.com

I suggest that the recent rise of homosexuality is a reaction made by a patriarchical culture to the movement to give women equal rights. Homosexuals are trying to derive women even of the status in human relationships.

A homosexual is effectively saying "I can go ahead and have a sexual relationship without including women, without having the consent of a woman." Homosexuality seems to be all about reducing the power and status of women- of making them unnecessary. I think, in spirit and effect, it is almost akin to rape.

Vox Day #sexist #psycho voxday.blogspot.com

[On warrior women in fantasy]

Has Phony ever hit a woman? Has he ever seen a woman's head snap back, seen her knees buckle, and stood over her as she lays crumpled on the floor? Has he ever bloodied a woman's nose or blackened a woman's eyes? Has he ever toyed with a woman desperately trying to lay a hand on him before stepping forward and flattening her with a single jab?

I have. It wasn't even amusing because it was so easy. I had a harder time fighting a well-trained eleven year old boy. I wasn't even throwing any combinations or throwing my strikes at more than half-force, and that was still enough to lay them out. If you are a man who hasn't ever hit a woman in the face, or if you are a woman who hasn't ever been beaten up by a man, your opinion on the subject is guaranteed to be irrelevant. The cumulative difference in speed, strength, and mass simply has to be experienced to be believed.

I sincerely encourage anyone who wishes to write about women warriors to visit a full-contact dojo and ask to spar a few rounds with the opposite sex. They will accommodate you and it will be an eye-opening experience.

Holden (aka caamib) #sexist #psycho cwckiforums.com

[previous poster]"So if I'm hearing you right, if a woman tried to leave you, you would try to harm her so that she wouldn't. If she still managed to leave you after that you would try to make her suffer a fate worse than death?"

You're not hearing me right. I'd make sure she's destroyed the moment she tries to leave me. Before we'd even start dating I'd make her do a porn with a horse or a dog, I'd have all her credit card numbers, I'd know all about her tiniest details.

It sucks, but no other way to keep a modern woman. However, that's just another hypothetical scenario. They're not capable for relationships anyway.

Matt Forney #sexist gab.ai

Women who support gay rights but refuse to have anal sex are the weakest race.What do you think your gay besties are doing behind closed doors, honey? Holding hands while humming "It's Raining Men?"

Anders Breivik #sexist sites.google.com

In my compendium I have written a great deal about the deconstruction or absence of moral stands in Norway after 1968. That's a big problem, but I can't elaborate on it at this moment. The problem is that today we have ideals in Norway that are harmful for Norway, that will cause us great harm in our future. STDs and the sexual revolution are not analysed well enough. And that caused great problems in Norway and Europe.

The ideal is to have sex with as many strangers as possible. Rather than to idealize the nuclear family, that was the emphasis in Europe until the mid sixties, we focus on dissolving the nuclear family with all the problems it brings with it. For example the ideals of "Sex in the city", where Samantha and Carrie have sex with over one hundred men during the course of 100, 200 episodes of the series. It is these ideals that are presented to our sisters and daughters today. This is a sickness. These sick ideals must be censored and kept away from our society.

Now I'll get to the neglect of our duty towards our families and our nation. People receive education, they travel, they are 35 before they decide on having children. That is not a sustainable development. Women should start having children in their twenties. Our birth rate lies below the necessary minimum. I will not elaborate further on that.

RetroSpriteResources #sexist forum.deviantart.com

So about two dozen women jumped on me because I'm pro-life and won't stop threatening me, cursing me out and spamming my page.

They have threatened to shove a cactus up my ass, cut off my dick and balls, force me to drink their period blood and much more.

On top of that, they have been accusing me of being a rapist, saying that I abuse my wife and even accused me of wanting to sexually abuse an anime girl because I uploaded a picture of her in a bikini in a parody journal.

They've also been sexually harassing me because they THINK they can get away with sexual harassment because they're female. They've been asking me for sex in a sarcastic, taunting way, they've been discussing what my penis tastes like and one even said she fapped to the idea of me getting raped by body builders.

They've been recruiting new women to harass me by the day by spamming a photoshopped comment where I say that I want rape to be legalized. They made me lose a great friend this way and made an alternate account making fun of me, as well as offensive memes with an ugly drawing of my face.

Please, I don't want rape to be legalized and I don't hate women. I'm only pro-life, is that really so bad? Do I really deserve all this abuse just because I don't support the mass slaughter of babies? People didn't treat the World War 2 vets this way after they stopped the Nazis from mass slaughtering the Jews.

These women are nothing but a bunch of disgusting sluts. You wanna know what I really said about legalized rape? I said that it should be legal to rape sluts because it's their fault rape is a problem to begin with. But I don't think that rape should be legal unless it's against your spouse or a slut.

Please, ban all these women!

TimRattayGotScrewed #sexist reddit.com

Every living heterosexual man wants to fuck hot teenage girls. That's how human biology works. Most people lose their virginity as teenagers, in case you weren't aware.

Now, you can virtue signal until the cows come home, but you're no different than anyone else in that regard, and I know it as well as you, so the joke's on you.