#psychoceramics

The narrow-minded fools at FSTDT laughed at my theories of Fractaral Psychoceramics! They called me mad! They called me a CRACKPOT!

Show post

Metapedia #wingnut #psychoceramics en.metapedia.org

[From their article about the "Milice", as of 25 November 2015, at 16:37]

The Milice française (English: French Militia), generally called simply Milice, was a French counter-terrorist force created on 30 January 1943 by the French State to help the government defend the people by fighting the communists and the Allied terrorist conspiracy against France. The Milice's leader was Secretary-General Joseph Darnand. Its formation "was hailed with loud approval" by the great French patriot Charles Maurras, who called for it to be merciless against the so-called 'resistance'.[1]

Early volunteers for the Milice included members of France's pre-war patriotic parties, such as the Action Française, but also working-class men by then convinced of the blessings of France's alliance with Germany, instead of the British and their puppet de Gaulle.

[...]

The Milice was the successor to Joseph Darnand's Service d'ordre légionnaire(SOL) militia. It carried out military trials and legal executions of Bolshevik terrorists and other enemies of the people. As a result, Communist terrorists targeted individual Miliciens for assassination, often in open areas such as cafés and public streets. They carried out their first atrocity against the force on 24 April 1943, when they gunned down Marseilles Milicien Paul de Gassovski. By late November, the left-wing newspaper Combat reported that 25 miliciens had been murdered and 27 wounded in communist terror attacks (the actual numbers were much higher).

By far the most prominent Milicien to fall to the terrorists was Philippe Henriot, the French State's Minister of Information. He and his wife were murdered in their apartment in the Ministry of Information in the rue Solferino in the pre-dawn hours of June 28, 1944 by communist terrorists dressed as Miliciens. The Milice retaliated for these murders by evening the score with enemies of the people such as subversive politicians and "intellectuals" who were beholden to the plutocratic Allies and the Bolshevik fifth column in France, such as Victor Basch and Georges Mandel.

Confined initially to the former zone libre of France under the control of the French State (which moderated its actions and forbade some of its more radical aspirations), the radicalized Milice in January 1944 moved into what had been the zone occupée of France, including Paris. They established their headquarters in the old Communist Party headquarters at 44 rue Le Peletier, as well as 61 rue Monceau, a house formerly owned by the Menier family, makers of France's best-known chocolates. The Lycée Louis-Le-Grand was occupied as a barracks. An officer candidate school was established, to send a message that they knew who was behind the terror in the Auteuil synagogue.

Perhaps the largest and best-known operation by the Milice was its attempt in March 1944 to suppress the terrorists in the département of Haute-Savoie in the southeast of France near the Swiss border, the Battle of Glières.[2] The efforts of the Milice proved insufficient, however, and German troops had to be called in to complete the operation. On Bastille Day (14 July) 1944, Miliciens put down a revolt by criminals at Paris's Santé prison.

[...]

An unknown number of Miliciens managed to escape prison or murder, either by going underground or fleeing abroad. A tiny number were prosecuted in show-trials later. The most notable of these was Paul Touvier, the former commander of the Milice in Lyon. In 1994, he was convicted of ordering the retaliatory execution of seven Jews at Rillieux-la-Pape for terrorism they had instigated. He died in prison two years later.

Show post

Ugly_equals_Death #sexist #psychoceramics incels.co

[Blackpill] The root of the incel problem is planned children and birth control. YOU RARELY SEE A FEMALE ONLYCHILD ULTIMATE BLACKPILL NO ONE WANTS DAUGHTERS

Title. Tbh it sounds very simple and people will say "no it is hypergamy the media and daa jooos!!1!1" but honestle the inballance male to female ratio is the real problem. I mean incels wouldnt exist if there where an excess of young females. And ((science)) says shit like, in good times more boys are born. But this isnt even an explenation because even with the natural excess of males (more male sperm is produced due to higher premature death rate of men) the ratio wouldnt be this fucked up like it is today in young generations.

And i am talking about the west, not about places like asia or muslim countrys.

And my explenation is this.

People dont want daughters they want sons, males and females hate daughters. Women hate each other and men hate women they cant fuck.

And this leads to a very specific reproduction pattern:

People start a family and get there first child

-->if its a son they stop reproducing OR get another child
-->if its a daughter they ALLWAYS get another child

-->if they have 2 female children they ALLWAYS STOP REPRODUCING! no one wants 3 daughters.
-->if they hit the number of children they can provide for they usually stop reproducing (white people do it like this usually)

If they have 2 children its most of the time a older sister and a brother or 2 daughters.
If they have one child its allways a son.

You rarely see a female onlychild or a younger sister and older brother because NORMIES ARE BLACKPILLED THEY KNOW SONS ARE BETTER THEN DAUGHTERS THEY DONT WANT TO RAISE CHADS HOLES.

No matter what they say look at the numbers look what they do. Also if you see people with 3 children its most of the time 3 sons or 2 sons 1 daughter because people who have 2 daughter stop reproducing no one in the world can take the burdon to raise 3 daughters, no one, if they hit the 2 daughters mark they instantly stop. 2 daughters is the most a man can take, no sane mane would risk raising 3 times chads whore.

TLDR: no one wants a daughter, and 2 daughters is the MAXIMUM a man can bare to have, while hed be happy to have 20 sons.

Show post

Faceception #psychoceramics #mammon faception.com

THEORY BEHIND THE TECHNOLOGY

The face can be used to predict a person’s personality and behavior.

This claim relies on a combination of two known research observations

1. According to Social and Life Science research personalities are affected by genes.

In fact genes play a greater role in determining key personality traits like social skills and learning ability than the way we are brought up by our parents, researchers claimed.

Researchers from Edinburgh University studied more than 800 sets of identical and non-identical twins to learn whether genetics or upbringing has a greater effect on how successful people are in life. Writing in the Journal of Personality, the researchers found that identical twins were twice as likely as non-identical twins to share the same personality traits, suggesting that their DNA was having the greatest impact.

2. Our face is a reflection of our DNA

Researchers have identified five of the genes that shape a person's face. Researchers previously knew that genetics played a large role in determining face shape, since identical twins share DNA. However, little was known about exactly which genes are involved. Three genes were thought to have roles in the arrangement of facial features, and the new research confirmed their involvement.

Working on mice, researchers have identified thousands of small regions of DNA that influence the way facial features develop. The researchers said that although the work was carried out on animals, the human face was likely to develop in the same way

In fact, It’s already possible to make some inferences about the appearance of crime suspects from their DNA alone.

And indeed, researchers were able to demonstrate that “Internal facial features are signals of personality and health.
While these type of affirmations are quite recent, in Chinese history, there have been people that have studied the “mapping of the face” for thousands of years.

Also, the epigenetics phenomena has recently demonstrated, in academia researches and March 31th 2017 Science magazine.

Show post

Faceception #psychoceramics #mammon faception.com

OUR TECHNOLOGY

Faception is first-to-technology and first-to-market with proprietary computer vision and machine learning technology for profiling people and revealing their personality based only on their facial image.

Faception can analyze faces from video streams (recorded and live), cameras, or online/offline databases, encode the faces in proprietary image descriptors and match an individual with various personality traits and types with a high level of accuracy. We develop proprietary classifiers, each describing a certain personality type or trait such as an Extrovert, a person with High IQ, Professional Poker Player or a Terrorist. Ultimately, we can score facial images on a set of classifiers and provide our clients with a better understanding of their customers, the people in front of them or in front of their cameras.

OUR PROCESS
imageFaception offers an SDK to enable companies in various industries embed our technology in their applications. The application runs in the cloud, on a local machine, or a video camera, is flexible, scalable and real time, and can integrate with other solutions such as Facial Recognition technology to provide a full spectrum solution that covers known and anonymous individuals.

OUR CLASSIFIERS

Utilizing advanced machine learning techniques we developed and continue to evolve an array of classifiers. These classifiers represent a certain persona, with a unique personality type, a collection of personality traits or behaviors. Our algorithms can score an individual according to their fit to these classifiers.

HIGH IQ

Endowed with a reasoning skills, like logic, spatial skills. Self-made people, free-thinkers and entrepreneurs. Exceptionally gifted, tend to be less socially oriented, value truth, facts and logic more than emotional relations. Creative and independent minded, with exceptional concentration abilities, a high intellect and mental capacity

Academic Researcher

Endowed with sequential thinking, high analytical abilities, a multiplicity of ideas, deep thoughts and seriousness. Creative, with a high concentration ability, high mental capacity, and interest in data and information.

Professional Poker Player

Endowed with a high concentration ability, perseverance and patience. Goal-oriented, analytical, with a dry sense of humor. Silent, devoid of emotion and emotional expression, strict and sharp minded, with high critical perception.

Bingo Player

Endowed with a high mental ceiling, high concentration, adventurousness, and strong analytical abilities. Tends to be creative, with a high originality and imagination, high conservation and sharp senses.

Brand Promoter

Endowed with a high self-confidence, authoritative, charismatic and magnetic personality, with high intellect and high verbal ability. Tends to be kind, sociable and direct, and very practical.

White-Collar Offender

Tends to have a low self-esteem, a high IQ and charisma. Anxious, tensed and frustrated, competitive, ambitious and dominant. Usually loves to take risks and have a dry sense of humor.

Terrorist

Suffers from a high level of anxiety and depression. Introverted, lacks emotion, calculated, tends to pessimism, with low self-esteem, low self image and mood swings.

Pedophile

Suffers from a high level of anxiety and depression. Introverted, lacks emotion, calculated, tends to pessimism, with low self-esteem, low self image and mood swings.

Show post

Bangkok or bust #sexist #psychoceramics incels.co

Foids admitting most men are not good looking enough for "shallow hookups" is an admission that SEXUAL ATTRACTION IS ABOUT LOOKS

Can't get sex from Tinder? Got ignored in college while girls fucked your drunken douche Chading Tatum lookalike roommates?

"Shallow hookups/one night stands," IT says.

OK, idiots. Here's the problem with that. You are admitting that when people want to just seek out enjoyable sex, they go for attractive people (as an aside, if looks are subjective, why didn't WE get offers for shallow hookups? Hmmmmmm).
So what does this mean? It means that enjoyable sex is about having it with someone foids find physically attractive. If it weren't, college girls and Tinder users would be looking for personality connections (or whatever stupid shit you guys think we should be striving for) when looking for enjoyable sex.
So what you are indirectly saying is that ugly or plain men like us should accept that no women will ever be SEXUALLY ATTRACTED to us, nor enjoy sex with us the way they would with men they find physically attractive Chadums. And that we should be excited about a potential passionless bourgeois relationship with a woman over 35 who used to ride the cc and is with us because we're "good for her" in the same way a health nut shoves raw spinach down his throat and says that he prefers spinach to pizza because "taste is superficial anyway."

No, thanks. We want women to think we're hot. We want them to want to rip our clothes off and have passionate sex with us. And we have no interest in the depressing "settling" alternative. There is nothing noble about settling for mediocrity. You are not successful just because you can create a facade of what you consider to be salvaged dignity and condescend to others about how you're "adulting."

---------------------------------------------------

Incel: I can't get laid because I'm ugly.
IT Becky: Just getting laid and hookups are shallow, it's nothing serious, sex means nothing sweets.
Incel: You don't even want to consider us for "shallow" hookups, but according to you, we are good for "serious" relationships. Does not make any sense.
IT Becky: Lmao where did I say we consider you for serious relationships?
Incel: Well then why are you saying hookups are shallow? Hook ups lead to relationships. How is that relevant? I am confused.
IT Becky: Dis y u inkweasel, are so toxic, that's a big turnoff for me and all my galfwends. Sought your mental problems out. Teehee.

Show post

NotForMe1 #sexist #psychoceramics incels.co

[Blackpill] The dark pussy pill.

One of the most things femoids hate about themselves is when they have a brownie down there instead of a pink flower.

They hate it because it looks like asshole. Don't believe me? Google about it.

Most women do have asshole pussy and it's disgusting. Even men have lighter asshole than foids actual pussy.

So my boys, whenever you're in a fight with a hole, just tell her she has a dark hole personality or something like that.

Tell her brownies suck.

Show post

Forschungsgesellschaft für Archäologie, Astronautik und SETI #ufo #psychoceramics #mammon exopolitik.org

DVD ‘Extraterrestrial Visitors in Prehistory’ out now

Was Earth visited by extraterrestrial astronauts in the distant past? For decades, the Forschungsgesellschaft für Archäologie, Astronautik und SETI [Research Society for Archaeology, Astronautics and SETI] (A.A.S), co-founded by Erich von Däniken, has been collecting evidence for this theory all around the globe. At the One-Day-Meeting of the A.A.S. 2012 in Dresden, the researchers presented their new insights into the topics of Ancient Astronauts and SETI.

Content:

* Bearer of the Moving Name of God - Peter Fiebag
* Secret Signs in South America - Marie Marthe Rennel, Wolfgang Siebenhaar
* Impossible! Technology Transfer in Prehistory - Alexander Knörr
* The Devil’s Handiwork: Mortuary Cult and Belief in Resurrection - Daniela Machnitzke
* Fascinating Objects of Unclear Origin on the Surface of Mars - Dr. Detlef Hoyer
* Monstrum Humanum Rarissimum – Alien or Freak of Nature? - Angelika Jubelt
* News from Object M of Talinn - Lars Fischinger
* Hidden Eremite and Flying Chariots - Dr. Algund Eenboom
* New Enigmas in Mystery Land - Luc Bürgin
* Return of the Gods - Erich von Däniken
* Discussion

Original GermanDVD 'Außerirdische Besucher in der Vorzeit' erschienen

Wurde die Erde in grauer Vorzeit von außerirdischen Raumfahrern besucht? Die von Erich von Däniken mitbegründete Forschungsgesellschaft für Archäologie, Astronautik und SETI (A.A.S.) sammelt seit Jahrzehnten rings um den Erdball Indizien für diese Theorie. Beim One-Day-Meeting der A.A.S. 2012 in Dresden präsentierten die Forscher ihre neuesten Erkenntnisse in Sachen Prä-Astronautik und SETI.


Inhalt:

Träger des bewegten Gottesnamens - Peter Fiebag
Geheime Zeichen in Südamerika -Marie-Marthe Rennel, Wolfgang Siebenhaar
Unmöglich! Technologietransfer in der Vorzeit - Alexander Knörr
Teufelswerk: Totenkult und Auferstehungsglaube - Daniela Machnitzke
Cart Ruts auf den Azoren - Hans-Dieter Gau
Faszinierende Objekte ungeklärten Ursprungs auf der Marsoberfläche - Dr. Detlef Hoyer
Monstrum Humanum Rarissimum – Alien oder Missgeburt? - Angelika Jubelt
Neues zu Objekt M von Talinn - Lars Fischinger
Verborgene Einsiedler und fliegende Wagen - Dr. Algund Eenboom
Neue Rätsel im Mysteries-Land - Luc Bürgin
Die Rückkehr der Götter - Erich von Däniken
Diskussion

Außerirdische Besucher in der Vorzeit - A.A.S. One-Day-Meeting 2012 (Trailer)[/url]

Show post

Siddhartha Chaibub, Olavo de Carvalho and Ernesto Araújo #psychoceramics #dunning-kruger theguardian.com

Siddhartha Chaibub’s suspicions that the Earth wasn’t really round were first aroused when he stumbled across a YouTube video while living in Brazil’s capital, Brasília.

“I was always very sceptical about things,” said the 35-year-old freelance designer, who soon dived deep into the flat Earth universe: reading, watching videos and joining a dedicated WhatsApp group.

By the end of 2015, he was convinced. “The model that is imposed on us – that the Earth is spherical – is full of contradictions,” he said.

Today, his YouTube channel Professor Terra Plana (Flat Earth Professor) – featuring videos such as “25 examples that prove Nasa is a fraud” and “gravity doesn’t exist” – has nearly 29,000 subscribers.

Like Britain and the United States, Brazil is seeing a revival of flat Earth theory: 7% of the population – 11 million Brazilians – believe that the Earth is flat, according to the polling firm Datafolha. The poll noted believers were more likely to be religious or poorly educated.

Last week, Chaibub and three of his flat Earth fellows got their biggest break yet when they appeared on the country’s most-watched talkshow, The Night, to promote Brazil’s first ever flat Earth convention this Saturday in São Paulo.

The location of the event will only be disclosed on the day, organizers say, for security reasons. “There is a lot of prejudice,” said Chaibub

[...]

Accusations of links to the flat Earth movement have dogged Bolsonaro’s government.

In January, the science minister, Marcos Pontes – South America’s first astronaut – said that he felt a “knot in the stomach” when he heard suggestions that the Earth is flat.

But just a few months later, Olavo de Carvalho – a former astrologer who is considered the intellectual guru of Bolsonaro and his inner circle – prompted outrage and ridicule when he tweeted: “I didn’t study the subject of the flat Earth. I just watched a few videos of experiments that show that aquatic surfaces are flat – and so far I haven’t found anything to refute them.”

Carvalho – who has also claimed Pepsi was sweetened with aborted foetuses and that oral sex can cause cancer – dined with Bolsonaro and Steve Bannon in Washington during the Brazilian president’s state visit to the US in March.

When questioned about flat Earthism, the foreign minister, Ernesto Araújo – an Olavo disciple who believes climate change is a Marxist plot – also seemed sympathetic to the movement, saying: “For me, the Earth is round. But it’s important to have this spirit of questioning,”

Show post

ionlycopenow #sexist #psychoceramics incels.co

Incel trait: being kind-hearted, compassionate and forgiving

Right now, in your mind think of how many dudes that fit the description above that have ever had a gf at best. No, obviously not hooked up, so much as had a gf that had sex with. None.

Now, how many dudes who are loud, obnoxious and douchebag assholes can you think of who got laid alot? Probably quite a few. Reminder women never evolved and love good looking, douchebag men as they've always had since the beginning of time.:soy: :soy: :soy: :soy: :soy: :soy: OMG r/niceguys OMG OMG

Show post

Eugene McCarthy #psychoceramics macroevolution.net

Monotremes: Bird-mammal hybrids?

One strong clue that platypuses may be bird-mammal hybrids is the fact that in research appearing in the journal Nature Grützner et al. (2004) reported that platypuses, despite being classified as mammals, lack the gene SRY, which determines sex in mammals, and instead have a gene similar to DMRT1, which determines sex in birds (see also: Veyrunes et al. 2008). They demonstrated that the platypus genome contains sex chromosomes of both bird and mammal origin (read an article about this research >>). As Grützner, specifically stated in an interview: “The platypus actually links the bird sex chromosomes system with the mammalian sex chromosome systems.”

A draft version of the platypus genome (Warren et al. 2008) identified at least two genes otherwise known only in birds (see also Rens et al. 2007). Indeed, some of the sex chromosomes of monotremes share homology with bird sex chromosomes rather than those of mammals, report Veyrunes et al. (2008), who state that there is no homology between the platypus and therian X chromosomes…the platypus X chromosomes have substantial homology with the bird Z chromosome (including DMRT1) and to segments syntenic with this region in the human genome. Thus, platypus sex chromosomes have strong homology with bird, but not to therian† sex chromosomes.

Dohm et al. (2007) and Rens et al. (2007) have also identified regions of homology with the chicken Z sex chromosome on the platypus sex chromosomes X2p and X1p. And yet, Veyrunes et al. (2008, p. 966) found that "not a single BAC identified on the platypus sex chromosomes represented scaffolds that shared homology with the human X chromosome." In other words, researchers have found large regions of the platypus sex chromosomes that are very similar to regions on the chicken sex chromosome Z, and yet no similarity whatsoever to the sex chromosome of a mammal, i.e., the human X chromosome. And Veyrunes et al. (2008, p. 970) specifically state that "Platypus sex chromosomes are more bird-like than mammal-like."

The foregoing genetic evidence, then, is clearly consistent with the idea that platypuses are anciently derived from a cross between a mammal and a bird. So is the fact that they both lay eggs and produce milk. Their strange morphology, too, combines birdlike traits with those of a mammal. Obvious and well-known features of this sort are the presence of both a duckbill and a hair coat. But they also have a variety of lesser-known traits that seem to connect them with birds despite their classification as mammals.

If platypuses are not bird-mammal hybrids, then why should this be the case? It seems that only an extreme bias against the idea that such distant hybrids might be possible can account for the failure of scientists to recognize this obvious implication.

Available evidence for echidnas, the other type of monotreme, points in the same direction as what's available for platypuses. Like platypuses, echidnas lay eggs and produce milk. They also have a birdlike beak, but lack the feathers of a bird, and instead have a coat of spines like a hedgehog or porcupine. And they have many other avian characteristics.

The name monotreme, meaning “single orifice,” refers to the presence in both platypuses and echidnas of a cloaca, a common chamber into which the intestines, as well as the reproductive and urinary ducts, vent (Vaughan et al. 2011, p. 120). Though monotremes of both sexes do have a cloaca (as do birds, reptiles and amphibians), other mammals don't—with the exception of certain Malagasy insectivores known as tenrecs (Vaughan et al. 2011). In fact, the great French anatomist Georges Cuvier stated that the reproductive tracts of monotremes are “infinitely closer to those of oviparous animals than to those of mammals” (Recherches sur les ossemens fossile, vol. 5, p. 68).

It is because platypuses and echidnas have many features that are typical of birds, and not of mammals, that they are classified as separate from all other mammals. Since their genomes both contain genes otherwise found only in birds, and since they have so many other traits that connect them with birds, is it not, perhaps, reasonable to consider the possibility that they are not merely birdlike mammals, but that they are actually rare examples of hybrids descended from ancient, unusual matings between mammals and birds?

One might suppose that such distant crosses would be absolutely impossible, which is the big sticking point for some people. Indeed, there are those who are quite vehement on this point, though it's hard to see why, since little experimentation has been carried out to test the question. Commercial investigations using artificial insemination demonstrate beyond doubt that in some fairly distant crosses among birds (e.g., turkey × chicken or quail × chicken), a small percentage of fertilized eggs actually develop into mature hybrids (McCarthy 2006). And extensive experiments involving the hybridization of distantly related fish, Newman (1915, 1917 and 1918) found that many such crosses did produce hybrids, even in the case of inter-ordinal crosses.

And such findings do not go entirely against expectation. After all, it's not as if a mammal spermatozoon that suddenly found itself in the cloaca of a bird would clasp its blushing cheeks and cry, “Oh my ears and whiskers! I should not be here! Whatever shall I do?” On the contrary, one might reasonably suppose that, at least in certain instances, any such mislaid gamete might swim merrily on, and that one or more of them might at last reach an ovum, and that sometimes, perhaps very rarely, fertilization might occur. And over geological time, among the many such zygotes formed, some few might well have reached maturity and produced offspring.

So it may well be that even in very distant crosses, such as one between a bird and a mammal, after many thousands of matings, a few hybrids would be produced. Indeed, by following the links in the sidebar at right, you will find that there is a great deal of evidence supporting the idea that such hybrids actually do occur. Of course, without experimentation the frequency and ease with which such hybrids are produced must remain a matter of speculation.

If platypuses and echidnas were bird-mammal hybrids it would explain why they, unlike other mammals have so many avian traits. As has already been mentioned, such traits are enumerated on a separate page of this website. As to the specific type of mammal and bird proposed as parents, for a platypus a likely choice would seem to be some sort of duck mated with an otter- or perhaps beaver-like mammal. In the case of the echidna, a reasonable combination would be a hedgehog mated with a kiwi (an echidna actually looks much like a hedgehog body with a kiwi head attached). Such crosses would, of course, be far outside what conventional biological thought would accept as possible. But, then again, perhaps convention is mistaken.

Show post

Eugene McCarthy #psychoceramics macroevolution.net

Human-chicken Hybrids
Page 1: The Hühnermensch
­

Caution: Some readers may find this page disturbing.
_____
Note: Although the report quoted on this page states that a woman gave birth to the specimen in question, all other allegations of human-chicken hybrids seem to refer to offspring hatched by chickens.
_____
Note: In listing reports of hybrids, it has been my policy to include all serious allegations, especially those of scholars, whether or not the hybrid alleged seems possible or likely to me. This policy, I think, helps to eliminate subjective judgment on my part, and therefore should remove at least one source of systematic bias from my work. It also helps to fulfill the ethical obligation of telling not just the truth, but the whole truth.
_____
imageThe Hühnermensch (as depicted in Friderici 1737). (Enlarge) The original engraving is life-sized (crown-rump length of subject is 20 cm). A: red-pigmented structure similar to the comb of a domestic fowl; B: sparse, downy hair; C: circular eye openings (as in G. gallus); D: red periophthalmic rings (as in G. gallus); E and F: nasal opening with rudimentary nares; G: oral cavity; g: external tongue (or wattle?); H: the “upper extremities are not unlike those of a plucked chicken”; I: hands with lengthy fingers and “claws exactly like those of a chicken”; K: umbilical cord; L: “The deformed feet, which are in an abnormal position and attached to chicken-like shanks, are, with the exception of their soles, of a wholly unwonted form, with the toes marvelously distorted and tipped with claws that are likewise exactly those of a domestic chicken”; M: cutaneous flap joining the thighs with the calves; N: a red-pigmented lentiform structure in place of normal human genitalia; O: anus (cloaca?).
_____
Although some people may take lurid interest in gazing at pictures of deformed infants such as those shown on this page, this article was written for a different reason, that being to record information that will assist scientists in answering a single question: How different can two animals be if they are to produce a hybrid together? Of course, this question cannot be answered by simply reading this page. After all, the creature discussed here may not even be a hybrid (though genetic tests of the specimen would probably be able to resolve that issue). But the information documented here will help anyone who wishes to investigate the matter further.

In 1735, the German physician Gottlieb Friderici (1693-1742) attended the delivery of an infant in the small town of Taucha, a few kilometers northeast of Leipzig. His patient, 28-year-old Johanna Sophia Schmied, had previously given birth to three normal boys, and Friderici anticipated nothing unusual.

“But then,” he writes,

from this fourth pregnancy she brought forth this dreadful monster, which I propose to describe. [Translated by E. M. McCarthy. Original Latin: “Tandem quarta vice gravida, horrendum hoc, quod describendum iam mihi proposui, in lucem edidit monstrum.”]

Friderici’s “dreadful monster,” stillborn that day after an eight-month gestation, was indeed peculiar, so peculiar that he took the trouble to write up a detailed anatomical account, entitled Monstrum humanum rarissimum (i.e., An Exceedingly Rare Human Monster), which he published two years later (Friderici 1737). He also immediately hired an artist to prepare engravings of this strange birth, now known as the Hühnermensch (“chicken-human”). The resulting illustrations, reproduced here, accompanied Friderici’s account.

This remarkable specimen has been preserved in the collection of the Heimatmuseum und Naturalienkabinett Waldenburg, a museum in Saxony, and is therefore available for genetic testing. Either by coincidence or by heredity, it does seem to have enough characteristics in common with chickens to earn its name. Friderici repeatedly commented on the ostensible connection this babe makes between Class Mammalia and Class Aves. For example, during the course of his anatomical description, he says,

The upper extremities are not unlike those of a plucked chicken … and the digits, while normal in order and number, have claws exactly like those of a chicken. [Translated by E. M. McCarthy. Original Latin: “Extremitates superiores significat, brachia scilicet alis gallinarum, plumis privatarum, non absimilia. Cubito annexae manus oculis se exponunt, digitis quidem, si rationem numeri et ordinis habeas, legitimis, unguibus autem pullorum ungulis plane similibus.”]

“The deformed feet,” he says,
which are in an abnormal position and attached to chicken-like shanks, are, with the exception of their soles, of a wholly unwonted form, with the toes marvelously distorted and tipped with claws that are likewise exactly those of a domestic chicken. [Translated by E. M. McCarthy. Original Latin: “adjectos trunco pedes monstrat, utpote qui, inusitatum plane situm obtinentes, cum gallinarum cruribus aliqua ex parte convenire videntur, si a plantis pedum discesseris, quae ab humanis quidem non diversae sunt, at digiti tamen mire distorti apparent, ac ungues itidem pullorum gallinaceorum unguas referunt.”]

As do chickens, this literal Wunderkind has eye rings (periophthalmic rings) and a comb-like structure atop its head, both composed of red tissue, as in chickens. In addition, as in all birds, the ears are represented by only a small opening with no raised, external ears (pinnae), which are present in all mammals other than monotremes. Also as in birds, external genitalia are absent and the testes are internal.

It can also be seen in the illustrations that the skin is loosely attached to the underlying tissues, so loosely that it forms webbing at various regions of flexure (neck, elbow, knee, crotch). The skin of a bird, too, is more elastic and more loosely attached to the body than is that of the typical mammal, which is generally interpreted as giving birds the freedom of movement needed for flight (Stettenheim 2000).

_____
Gottlieb Friderici was born in 1693 in the village of Taucha in Saxony (the same community where he later delivered the Hühnermensch). He completed his dissertation at the University of Leipzig around 1713 and became a doctor of philosophy and medicine. He was thereafter a general practitioner in Leipzig up to the time of his death in 1742. (Biographical details from Huppmann 2006.)
_____

The heart, too, was larger than that of an ordinary human infant. And, according to a Kentucky University webpage on the avian circulatory system,
Birds tend to have larger hearts than mammals (relative to body size and mass). The relatively large hearts of birds may be necessary to meet the high metabolic demands of flight. Among birds, smaller birds have relatively larger hearts (again relative to body mass) than larger birds. Hummingbirds have the largest hearts (relative to body mass) of all birds, probably because hovering takes so much energy.

During the necropsy, Friderici found that the comb-like structure atop the head actually contained brain tissue, a situation reminiscent of that described by Purohit et al. (1977), who note that many hybrids produced by crossing pheasants with chickens are exencephalic (i.e., the brain is located outside the skull).

_____
Kleeblattschädel
Among the anomalies exhibited by the Hühnermensch is a syndrome known as kleeblattschädel, a congenital anomaly in which there is intrauterine synostosis of multiple or all cranial sutures. This is another avian characteristic of the specimen, because in birds the cranial sutures also fuse at a very early stage of development (Brown 1915, p. 72).
_____

If the Hühnermensch actually is a bird-mammal hybrid, then at this distance in time, one can only speculate about what might have happened back in Taucha all those many years ago. Did a rooster wander into a rustic bedroom and sit for a time on the lap of his naked mistress? Perhaps Johanna Sophia Schmied was a member of a coven that engaged in dark orgiastic rites that resulted in a weird creature seeing the light of day? Or possibly one day while gathering eggs she had her hands full and placed some rooster-semen-coated eggs in her underpants to carry them back to the house? Whatever happened, it seems the Hühnermensch took flight from there.

_____
Why would such hybrids occasionally occur? In certain distant crosses only a small percentage of inseminations result in a viable hybrid. This fact has been experimentally verified in crosses of commercial interest, such as chicken × turkey, a cross in which about 1000 inseminations are required to produce a single adult hybrid. The vast majority of hybrids from such crosses die at various stages of development before reaching maturity. Among mammals, such distant hybrids often abort or are stillborn. Among birds, they usually die in the egg. But some, very few, survive. Even from the present, extremely distant cross (human × chicken), viable mature hybrids have been reported (however dubiously). So it seems that it is not that distant hybrids are entirely impossible, but rather that they do occur, but with hybrids that reach advanced stages of development being produced at only at very low frequencies. One can speculate that this experimental observation may reflect the existence of an unrecognized underlying rescue mechanism that activates/deactivates portions of the hybrid genome at random, so that different individuals have different developmental programs, a mechanism actuated, perhaps, via random heterochromatization of various portions of the composite genome.
_____

Some very strange pairings can result from imprinting. When a newborn mammal or bird is exposed to some animal not of its own kind it may “imprint” on that animal, that is, later in life it may seek mates of that kind rather than its own, as a sexual partners. In connection with the present case, Hess (1959) reports that he imprinted a rooster on human beings by exposing him only to humans during the first month of life and keeping him strictly away from other chickens. As an adult, the rooster sought only human mates even when allowed access to hens. So one can think of various scenarios based on this knowledge: an accidentally imprinted rooster, an intoxicated or unconscious woman, and a very unusual mating.

At any rate, this specimen is a very interesting one and, given that it would no doubt be an F1 hybrid (if it is a hybrid at all), it would be very easy to detect its origins with genetic testing. One quick and easy method would be PCR amplification using human and chicken primers. As Cicero once said (De Officiis, I, 6),

We must not treat the unknown as known and too readily accept it. And he who wishes to avoid this error (as all should do) will devote both time and attention to the weighing of evidence.
Show post

Eugene McCarthy #psychoceramics macroevolution.net

image
Long line of cartoon ostriches with their heads stuck into the sand labelled “Renowned Authority #(X)”: “There are no human hybrids!”
Medieval illustration of some human-headed boar-dog creature, its face replaced with a presumably self-drawn smiling face: “Hey! I didn’t know that!”

Show post

Silence DoGood #wingnut #psychoceramics dailywire.com

(commenting on the article “Brutal Video Emerges Of Female Teacher Violently Attacking Teen Girl, Report Says”)

Silence DoGood: The student was probably disrespecting the teacher, and disrupting the order. The last video shows the student hitting the teacher.
As soon as we get the crazed unions out of the schools, and ban porn and drugs (which conservatives are pretty apathetic and cowardly about), I’m all about bringing back corporal punishment into schools. Very effective a century ago, when a teacher used a paddle (or, if necessary, a bullwhip) on unruly kids.

AllofOurTwists: I don't see what you're obviously seeing. I see a defensive move - the kid swung her arm in nearly a full arc and hit from the side - seated - I might add. There is no way she could have inflicted damage even if she had connected; her weight wasn't behind it. Calling it a punch is disingenuous. What the teacher did - three times - was punching. At no time, in either video, is the kid in an offensive or threatening position.

Why was the sub looming over the kid? Was the kid sleeping? Did the video start in the middle of the altercation? What started it? A smart mouth - heck, even name-calling - does not justify what the video shows this supposed adult doing.

Silence DoGood: The fact is that today's children are the most disrespectful in American history. They need to learn respect through any means necessary.

A short while ago, two years ago, my 17-year-old son defied his mother, in MY home. I ordered him to apologize, he didn't, then defied me. Told him if he said anything else, he'd regret it. He did. He ended up in the bathtub, and got up furious, wanting to fight. Due to a freak brush of my nose against the wall, my face was bloodied, but I don't regret what I wound up doing to him at all, only that I hadn't exercised a lot, and so got out of breath quickly, though I'm pretty fit. Since then, he has been very well-behaved, has excelled in school, and has turned into a model citizen.

Part of love is correction. Tolerating disrespect from a child isn't love, it's hatred. The supreme form of hatred is to ignore another’s wrongdoing. Love corrects, hatred leaves another to destroy itself.

Show post

Jeffrey Joseph Wolynski #psychoceramics vixra.org

What Are Volcanoes and Why do They Exist?
Jeffrey J. Wolynski
Jeffrey.wolynski@yahoo.com
November 2, 2019
Rockledge, FL 32955

Abstract: Geologists do not know what volcanoes are and why they exist on Earth. Now we can finally answer the basic questions with stellar metamorphosis. Volcanoes are composed of liquid rock escaping the surface, but why liquid rock? Why don't all the other rocky objects all have active volcanoes? Why are some worlds almost absent huge numbers of volcanoes? This paper addresses this.
Volcanoes are the areas in the Earth's crust where heat can escape from earlier stages of evolution. They are only apparent because Earth has a set of qualities that are unique to its specific stage of evolution.

1. It is old enough to have formed a solid surface crust internally from gas giant stages of evolution.

2. It is young enough to still have remaining heat escaping the surface.

3. It is evolved enough to have had the vast majority of its supremely thick atmosphere dissipated so we can see them.

4. The heat escapes as liquid rock, as that is the lower phase as opposed to superheated gas and plasma. Earth in younger stages was totally plasma like the Sun, and also had superheated gas internally like Jupiter and Neptune.

5. Some superheated gas also escapes volcanoes, and is why many of them are so explosive when they erupt. The gas was trapped there in the crust when the Earth was a gas giant. It is still escaping out from the crust even today, 4.5+ billion years into its evolution.

Volcanos are predicted via stellar metamorphosis to exist underneath the thick oceans of ocean worlds where there is a crust forming, all the way to late stage Earths, when the crust is just thin enough for heat to escape on the surface. Once the crust thickens up too much, there will be an increase in shield super-volcanos on the surface, similar to Olympus Mons on Mars. This will allow for the remaining heat to escape. Mars is between 20-30 billion years old.

When even greater scales of time are introduced things change, as Venus in the General Theory is about 450-700 billion years old. Venus is easily about 100+ times older than the Earth, and it shows. What is interesting to note is that the internal heat of Venus has escaped, which is evidenced by its lack of a strong magnetic field like the Earth. As well, its total diameter is about 400 miles smaller than the Earth. What this means to me, since heat has escaped, that Venus's actual diameter when it was hosting life like the Earth was probably a bit bigger. The entire crust has since then contracted from gravitational collapse and thermodynamic contraction, and no earthquakes can occur due to this fact. The crust has thickened over its lifetime, to extreme depths far beyond the Earth and even Mars. I would guess Venus's crust is at least 1,000 miles thick. All of its volcanoes are extinct because of its extreme age, easily 100+ times older than the Earth. It is a fossilized star. It is not the extreme age of Mercury though, with that fossil star we have a completely different picture.
Mercury in the General Theory is 7-32.75 trillion years old. Most evidence of volcanism is gone on Mercury, this is because it is so incredibly old, that the surface has been irradiated away over trillions of years. An enormous quantity of rocks and minerals that compose the star have been broken back into the elemental components and escaped the fossil star. One trillion years of wandering outer space will do that. Multiple trillions of years in Mercury's case will cause it to even decrease in mass by significant amounts. Given the escape velocity is much lower than the Earth, rocks and minerals broken up by irradiation can easily escape, especially when they become charged.
The astronomers believe Venus, Mars, Mercury and the Earth are all about the same age, but long story short, their volcanic histories rat them out. They are not anywhere close in age, in fact, some are multiple magnitudes older than others. The astronomers' theories are FUBAR. The fact that Mercury, Mars, Venus and Earth are close to the Sun, all orbiting it gives the illusion that they are related. They are not related. It is clear by examining their volcanic histories. Earth is the youngest of the bunch.

Earth: ~4.5 billion (This might change)
Mars: 20-30 billion (4.4-6.7 EA, EA means Earth Age)
Venus: 450-700 billion (100-155 EA)
Mercury: 7-32.75 trillion (1,555- 7,280 EA)
imageAs you will notice, Earths are not dead yet. They have left over heat from earlier stages of stellar evolution. Also what is important to notice is that young Earths shine, as they are the stars themselves. So when you read geology books and they say Earth is hot because of radioactive decay or whatever, you will know better. Earth is not still hot from radioactive decay, it is still hot because it is in earlier stages of evolution as compared to Venus, Mars and Mercury. We live in a polymetamorphic system, as noted in this paper: http://vixra.org/pdf/1902.0059v1.pdf

Poly meaning many, meta meaning after and morphic meaning change. We live in a many-after-change system. Volcanoes and their appearances and activity (or lack of) are direct evidence of the fact that we are dealing with stars vastly different in age. As well it should be apparent that the youngest stars do not even have volcanoes, they are far too young and energetic.

Show post

Gerges Francis Tawdrous #psychoceramics vixra.org

Earth Moon moves with 2 Rates Of Time (I)

What does mean 2 rates of time? 1 Day On The Sun = 1 Year On Earth In this equation there are 2 rates of time How to create them? By relativistic effects –in the solar group I have claimed that there's a physical point moves by a velocity =0.9999 C – where c= light known velocity =0.3 mkm/sec Based on this light velocity length contraction with rate 71 can be created but if the moon orbital inclination 5.1 degrees effect on the result will be 71 x 5.1 = 365.25 days (also Length contraction effect may contract 71 mkm to be seen as 1 mkm) But if Time And Distance Equivalence (Proves) (my previous paper) That means 1 Day On The Sun = 1 Year On Earth Example 10921 km (Moon Circumference) x 86400 seconds (Solar Day Period) = 940 mkm (Earth orbital circumference) (Moon = Earth Moon) What does this equation tell us? The equation tells that If Earth revolves around the sun one complete revolution in one solar day only – so the moon circumference will equal a distance passed by Earth Motion during 1 second period. So this equation refers to the possibility of existence more than one rate of time in the solar system – where T1= 1day and T2 = 365.265 days

Show post

Miroslaw Kozłowski #psychoceramics #magick #sexist researchgate.net

Women`s body cycles and Moon

(Abstract)

One sideness of Moon surface in respect to Humans on Earth suggest a special role played by Moon in women evolving and life. In some sense the creation of human embryo depends on Moon period. It seems that surface of Moon or some part of it emitted /reflected the Schumann Consciousness field (Psychon) which reached the only the women on Earth surface Divinus women are in direct connection with our Creator Wihout men Universe can survive, without women not

Show post

Igor Krichtafovitch #psychoceramics vixra.org

Information as the Evolution Driving Force

[…]
In contrast, a homo genus is the least accommodated to live on this planet. None of the homo habilis, homo erectus, and later inhabitants passed the survivability test. Furthermore, they all extinct. Homo sapiens, the only lone survivor, also was on the brink of extinction at least three times. Twice we barely escaped the extinction having slipped through the bottleneck of mitochondrial Eve 2 and Y-chromosome Adam 3. After evading these Scylla and Charybdis,powerful Toba super-eruption occurred about 74 thousand years ago. According to some theories, that event brought the human population to a mere 3,000-10,000 individuals. There is a growing body of literature casting a doubt on the very pillar of Darwinian theory: the natural selection by the survival of the fittest 4-8.
Should natural selection had been a real cause of the evolution of living species then fragile humans should gradually evolve into some fitter races. The natural evolution would change hairless bipedal feeble creatures into more robust primates, then to better fit mammals, and, eventually, to krill and single-celled bacteria. Some prominent scientists are not fond of and warn about “the obsession with natural selection” 9.
The irrefutable fact is that new species evolve and the evolution goes steadily in one dominant direction. The development vector does not point to the direction of highest survivability or productivity. As Richard Bird 8 put it: “Life increases in complexity in one specific sense; computational complexity.” Such statement is so obvious that it hardly can be argued against.

[…]

The evolution’s driver is not a survival of the fittest. It is an inescapable necessity of intelligence and memory storage growth.
Now our Hypothesis arrived at completion. The following postulates may summarize it:
1. Biological evolution as a natural life origin and development is a reality.
2. The evolution is a coordinated and controlled process, not a consequence of random mutations and/or survival of the fittest.
3. The evolution main development vector is a growing computational complexity of the Biosphere intelligence.
4. The intelligent matter which conducts and controls global evolution is a gigantic bio-computer combining all living organisms on Earth: the Global Mind (GM).
5. The GM is a virtual information matter (like a software) based on and running all living cells and organelles. The GM actions are initiated, powered and stimulated by random mutations.
6. Natural selection as a survival of the fittest is the definite factor in horizontal changes, i.e., within same species. The course of vertical evolutionary leaps is pushed by the growing Biosphere memory volume and organisms’ increasing complexity. Greater memory volume requires a greater number and more intellectually advanced organisms for storing and handling it. More intricate organisms require the greater computational complexity of GM in order to keep control over the Biosphere. This is an endless recursive endeavor with accelerated evolutionary dynamic.
7. New species (vertical evolutionary leap) occur when two conditions are met: a) global memory storage volume reaches its limit and b) global intelligence capacity (computational complexity) reaches critical mass capable of producing more advanced creatures.

The Hypothesis presented here does not contradict the naturalistic concept of life creation and evolution. It is not meant Darwinian concepts’ denial. It simply shows a different degree of the natural processes. The proposed concept may not be proven yet. I do not have a good evidence for the most claims and must rely on intuition.
However, as Karl Popper suggested a good theory is the one that has greater explanatory power. The Hypothesis logically resolves many puzzling problems with current state evolution theory. Some of them are listed below (I will address these issues at length in the oncoming publication):
1. Speciation, as a result of GM purposeful design.
2. Evolution development vector, as a need for better global intelligence.
3. Punctuated equilibrium, happening when two above conditions a) and b) are met.
4. Cambrian explosion, as a most pronounced case of punctuated equilibrium .
5. Mass extinctions, happening when more intelligent species should replace outdated creatures.
6. Why lab mutation long-term experiments do not result in new speciation? In these experiments “the critical mass” was not reached.
7. Why creatures fall asleep? GM has to communicated with individual living organisms in order to collect data and correct mutational errors.
8. Why is no paradise on the Earth? GM needs alert living organisms. It forces them to be active and creative.

Show post

Adrian Ferent #psychoceramics #fundie vixra.org

“I am the first who explained Religion with Science, Mathematics and Physics in mankind history. Religion and Quantum Evolution” Adrian Ferent “Evolution: each time we are born, we are born with higher Consciousness, because Consciousness is a function of time” Adrian Ferent “Evolution: in time the Consciousness has a higher number of Qubits” Adrian Ferent “Evolution: in time the Consciousness has a higher number of Quantum Consciousness states” Adrian Ferent “We need 5000 years to Evolve, 70 years or one life is not enough” Adrian Ferent “If we are born with the same Consciousness, after a time t1 we will have the same Consciousness, which is not true, this means we are born with different Consciousness, this means it is Evolution” Adrian Ferent “In the Consciousness function, N is the number of Quantum Consciousness states” Adrian Ferent “In the Consciousness function, N is the number of Qubits. The Consciousness operates on its Qubits” Adrian Ferent “When you die, the highest probability is that you will not go to hell or heaven” Adrian Ferent “I am the first who discovered Ferent Quantum Evolution theory (FQE) based on Consciousness Evolution; I am the first who discovered the Soul equation; I am the first who discovered that Matter was first, not God I am the first who discovered the Spiritual Universe in Ferent Quantum Gravity theory” Adrian Ferent “For me Religion is Science, for the rest of the scientists Religion is Occultism” Adrian Ferent “The Future of Science: the Ignorant scientists must be replaced by new Wise Scientists” Adrian Ferent I am the first who discovered a Quantum Evolution theory (FQE) based on Quantum Consciousness evolution, a Quantum Gravity theory (Ferent Quantum Gravity - FQG), I explained the Electron and the Electron charge… “I am the first who explained Religion with Science, Mathematics and Physics in mankind history” Adrian Ferent All Religion says we are born with the same consciousness, but after a while some people are bad, some people are good and they go to Heaven in on life! If the children die they will go to Heaven, because of their consciousness. What is the truth? The Consciousness function: t – the time between 0 and T N0 – the initial number of quantum consciousness states N – the final number of quantum consciousness states T – the value of the human soul cycle (5000 years), for Christians, Muslims, Atheists (70 years) “Evolution: in time the Consciousness has a higher number of Quantum Consciousness states” Adrian Ferent Another way to look at this function: “In the Consciousness function, N is the number of Qubits. The Consciousness operates on its Qubits” Adrian Ferent The Christians, the Muslims, the Atheists … who say we have one life are wrong because if N0 = 0, T =70 years, for example after 30 years people will have the same consciousness, which is not true. My theory is a proof for reincarnation, Evolution! About Consciousness function: “At each time t, each of us is at a different level of consciousness” Adrian Ferent “Evolution: in time the Consciousness has a higher number of Qubits” Adrian Ferent Consciousness is a function of time! “If we are born with the same Consciousness after a time t1, we will have the same Consciousness, which is not true, this means we are born with different Consciousness, this means it is Evolution” Adrian Ferent Religion without Evolution is Communism, this means we are born with the same Consciousness; but we do not have the same Consciousness. “We need 5000 years to Evolve, 70 years or one life is not enough” Adrian Ferent Jesus answered him, “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born again he cannot see the kingdom of God.” “Evolution means after couple lives all of us will attain the same Consciousness, this means it is Reincarnation” Adrian Ferent “Evolution: each time we are born, we are born with higher Consciousness, because Consciousness is a function of time” Adrian Ferent “When you die, the highest probability is that you will not go to hell or heaven” Adrian Ferent “I am the first who discovered Ferent Quantum Evolution theory (FQE) based on Consciousness Evolution; I am the first who discovered the Soul equation; I am the first who discovered that Matter was first, not God I am the first who discovered the Spiritual Universe in Ferent Quantum Gravity theory” Adrian Ferent “What you learned from your professors, from your books, from the greatest scientists, from clerics… about Dark Matter, Matter and God is wrong” Adrian Ferent “For me Religion is Science, for the rest of the scientists Religion is Occultism” Adrian Ferent “The Future of Science: the Ignorant scientists must be replaced by new Wise Scientists” Adrian Ferent 1. I am the first who explained Religion with Science, Mathematics and Physics in mankind history 2. I am the first who discovered what Evolution is: each time we are born, we are born with higher Consciousness, because Consciousness is a function of time 3. I am the first who discovered what Evolution is: in time the Consciousness has a higher number of Quantum Consciousness states 4. I am the first who discovered what Evolution is: in time the Consciousness has a higher number of Qubits 5. I am the first who discovered that the Consciousness operates on its Qubits 6. I am the first who discovered that if we are born with the same Consciousness after a time t1, we will have the same Consciousness, which is not true, this means we are born with different Consciousness, this means it is Evolution 7. I am the first who discovered that when you die, the highest probability is that you will not go to hell or heaven 8. I am the first who discovered that we need 5000 years to Evolve, 70 years or one life is not enough 9. I am the first who discovered Ferent Quantum Evolution theory (FQE) based on Consciousness Evolution; I am the first who discovered the Soul equation; I am the first who discovered that Matter was first, not God. I am the first who discovered the Spiritual Universe in Ferent Quantum Gravity theory 10. I am the first who discovered that what you learned from your professors, from your books, from the greatest scientists, from clerics… about Dark Matter, Matter and God is wrong 11. I am the first who explained that for me Religion is Science, for the rest of the scientists Religion is Occultism 12. I am the first who discovered the Future of Science: the Ignorant scientists must be replaced by new Wise Scientists

Show post

Evgeny A. Novikov #psychoceramics vixra.org

GRANGELS
Evgeny A. Novikov
University of California - San Diego, BioCircuits Institute, La Jolla, CA 92093 -0328; E-mail: enovikov@ucsd.edu

Abstract
Based on the quantum modification of the general relativity (Qmoger), gravitational angels (grangels) are introduced as areas of the background graviton condensate surrounding the interfaces between gravitons and the ordinary matter. The quantum entanglement is interpreted as interaction between splitting grangels. Our subjective experiences (qualia) are described in terms of grangels surrounding neuron clusters. A hierarchy of grangels is considered, including cosmological grangels

References
[1] Evgeny A. Novikov, "Ultralight gravitons with tiny electric dipole moment are seeping from the vacuum", Modern Physics Letters A, v. 31, No. 15 (2016) 1650092 (5 pages).
[2] Evgeny A, Novikov, "Quantum modification of general relativity", Electron. J. Theoretical Physics, v. 13, No. 13 (2016) 79-90.
[3] Evgeny A. Novikov, "Gravicommunication, subjectivity and quantum entanglement", NeuroQuantology, December 2016, v. 14(4), 677-682.
[4] Evgeny A. Novikov, “Emergence of the laws of nature in the developing entangled universe”, American.Research J. of Physics, v.4(1), (2018), 1-9.

[And yes, this is the entire “paper”]

Show post

Richard L Amoroso #psychoceramics vixra.org

Towards a Physics of Mind: Theoretical and Empirical Pathways to Enlightenment Across the Multi-Dimensional Barrier

Recent experimental discovery of Additional Dimensions (XD) beyond the 3D reality we observe means the Quantum Uncertainty Principle will no longer be a barrier to engineering Conscious Technologies. The 1st-person 3rd-person barrier (accessing other minds) will be systematically open to entanglement with conscious machines. Pragmatic Proof of Cartesian Duality (Mind not equal to Brain) will inspire seekers of enlightenment to follow a rigorous path to transcendent experience. Epistemology (Theory of knowledge) evolved from Myth & Superstition in the dark ages, to Logic & Reason framed by the Greeks, to the modern age of Empiricism begun by Galileo; and now completing the tools of epistemology, adding Transcendence - For those investing sufficient effort in following a well-formulated path.

Show post

NotedScholar #psychoceramics #racist sciencedefeated.wordpress.com

The Three Thousand Year Reich of Negative Numbers (part one)

The curious reader might be interested to know that Diophantus and the Greek thinkers rejected the concept of negative numbers (and irrational numbers, of course) as “patently ridiculous” and “idiotic.” And we are a Greek-based society. So to borrow David Hume’s plaintive question – Then whence Negative Numbers? The answer to this question lies in the Orient. If there was ever a “yellow menace,” negative numbers are it. The Chinese, the Indians, and the Muslims gave us negative numbers. Not the superior Greeks. Is this a coincidence? I think not. These countries have had a vested interest in the concept from the very beginning.

Fortunately, however, negative numbers are behind a very thin conceptual veil. Once removed, it is easy to see the “Chinaman behind the curtain.” I’ll just say QUED ahead of time. Observe:

I can have three horses, but I cannot have negative three horses. Some people, suffering from Cognitive Dissonance (CD), suggest that “debt” is a manifestation of negative numbers. But that’s really just arguing semantics. Wittgenstein and Derrida disproved semantics back in the 20th century. In any case, what’s really going on in the situation is not that I have negative horses; rather, I owe some positive horses (Positive horses=horses that exist; countable horses. Who would want to be owed imaginary horses?). We can get by just fine without negative numbers. Besides, the Universe is full of stuff, not -stuff. If you would like to confirm this, here is the relevant empirical experiment:

Turn your head this way and that, and look at things. You may if you wish do this in a lab, for a more sciencey feel.
This conclusion, in conjunction with the abolition of infinity, has pathbreaking – nay, watershed – consequences for the number line, which now looks like this:

image

I constantly get compliments for how incredibly parsimonious my arguments are – well, this one perhaps beats them all!

If the abolition of negative numbers in the conceptual schema catches on in the West, we can expect an end to the Three Thousand Year Reich of the Neo-Zoroastrians who think that the number line is an exact balance between negative and positive (seriously, what are the chances anyway that it would be an exact balance? It’s even worse than 1/Penultimate. It’s zero!). Now some might say that empirically the Universe is symmetrical, and they might cite anti-matter as confirmation of this. But there is not room here to discuss anti-matter; I’ll leave that for a future post!

Show post

Jeffrey J. Wolynski #psychoceramics vixra.org

The Principle of Diminishing Solar Abundances or the Solar Abundance Principle of Stellar Evolution

Jeffrey J. Wolynski
[Address removed]

Abstract: A simple principle of stellar evolution/planet formation is presented in light of the general theory of stellar metamorphosis.

According to stellar metamorphosis stars cool and die to become rocky differentiated worlds many billions of years into their evolution, and they are called exoplanets/planets. This means the abundances of lighter elements diminishes considerably as the star evolves, leaving the heavy elements and the elements which have combined into stable heavier molecules behind. This principle can be applied to all stars, even the evolved ones mislabeled “exoplanet/planet”. The oldest stars will have very little helium and the majority of the hydrogen will have combined into stable molecules or evaporated into interstellar space. This can also be used to determine how old a star is. The more hydrogen/helium the star has, opposed to other heavier elements, the younger it is.

“As stars evolve into rocky differentiated worlds, the ratio of lighter elements to heavy elements diminishes considerably.”

Show post

Leon Elshout #fundie #psychoceramics vixra.org

Aladdin’s city Agrabah as Endtimes Babylon & Jerusalem aka Atlantis
by leon elshout, almelo, NL, 11 october, 2019 – roodgoudvanparvaim.nl – aurichalcum2018 (at)protonmail.com

Aladdin’s wonderlamp matches with the lamp in Revelation 18:23. These are the lamps of rebuilt Babylon (Zacharia 5:11). Aladdin’s city Agrabah was a desert city. Like both Babylon and Jerusalem are desert cities, while Babylon is at the same time a seaport (Revelation 17). Agrabah was ‘a city of mystery, and enchantment’ (Agrabah, z.d.). As Endtimes Babylon is a mystery (Revelation 17:5) and a city of enchantment (Revelation 18:23). Agrabah was a city with a ‘palace and a marketplace’ (Agrabah, z.d.). As Endtimes Babylon will be a Kidinnu – marketplace (Leeman in D.J. Wiseman, 2004, p. 108). Agrabah was located on the Jordan river (Agrabah, z.d.). This means that there is a duality in the game. Agrabah is both Jerusalem and End Times Babylon. The name Aladdin could be a merging of Allah and Dzjinn. A djinn is in islamic culture a demonic spirt. While the word djinn also refers to the word ‘teen’ or ‘mud’ (Matheny, 2011, p. 240). Now we have a reference to the mud of Atlantis (Timaios 25) and to the mud of the Exodus story (Exodus 14:25). As to the mud out of which Adam was formed (Genesis 2:7).

Sources:
• Agrabah. (z.d.). in Disney.fandom.wiki. Geraadpleegd op 11 oktober 2019, van https://disney.fandom.com/wiki/Agrabah
• Matheny, G. M. (2011). Exodus, The Route, Sea Crossing, God's Mountain. USA: Xulon.

Show post

Metapedia #racist #psychoceramics en.metapedia.org

Europeans presented an angle of 80°, the Negro an angle of 70° and the orangutan of 58°. Another oft-noted difference between Negroes and Europeans is the girth and length of their erect penises. Negroes are found to possess penises an average 130% the length and 155% the girth of the average European, as well as showing a stunning value of 160% the "veininess." These differences are believed to be derived from the decreased intelligence and increased animal sex drive of the Negroid, with larger penises allowing for more efficient and brutal rape of children.

Show post

Gene Ray #psychoceramics #conspiracy #racist archive.is

(One of Gene Ray’s three sites besides TimeCube, AboveGod.com)

Christianity Is Poison Forced Upon Children.

Harmonic Cube Cubic Spirits Are Supreme Being.

Welcome
Timecube is AboveGod
imageGod is Ignorance.


You maybe academically retarded.

Academia Retards By Fact Earth Has 1 Day When Dead Still, And 4 Days Within 1 Earth Rotation, losing 3 days retards humanity.

Are you stupid and evil?

If you are ignorant of natures harmonic time cube creation, then you were taught to be stupid and evil.

Human Form God Is Impossible.
Adult God is a Scam upon Children.
Worship Of Word As God, Equates To Adults
Eating Their Children.
Deuteronomy 28:53-58.
God Is Unnatural And
Equates Hate Of Child.

image Children are taught evil, but don't care,
and accept free speech suppression.

Bible writers never knew that in the same 24 hours of light, 24 hours of darkness, 24 hours of sundown, and 24 hours of sunup, 1 day is evil.

1 Day is most insidious evil ever invented. 1 rotation of 4 corner Earth Time is 4 Days.

Educators are Liars.

If God is not measurable, He is Fictitious.

Without Cubic Creation, Life is Fictitious.

IGNORANCE

You have not been taught the Harmonic Cube Power that transcends all Gods.You are ignorant of Divine Spirit measure existing in Great Pyramid abstract of human personification. Perpetual power of Cubic Creation will exist beyond terminal antifamily religion.

CUBIC RACIAL SPHERE

image

If the 4 racial components of 2 sex pole hemispheres agreed to a cubing of the sphere as a spiritual unity, heavenly music of cubed sphere could be audible on Earth simultaneously to every human ear, not discord, but harmony.

The simultaneous 4 human races debunks a God for any race.

Sunup represents Indian Race
Midday represents White Race
Sundown represents Asian Race
Midnight represents Black Race

Humans fear to know natures simultaneous 4 corner 4 day 4 race 4 generation harmonic TIMECUBE creation. for it debunks false gods. Test Your God. Time Cube Test cannot harm a God of Truth, but will destroy fakes. Fake gods refuse test.

image
You are stupid and evil about the
Earth's top and bottom, front and
back and it's 2 sides. Most everything
created has these Cube like values.

No human has a right to believe wrong.
There is but a single creation principle,
therefore since we have no single belief,
all present religions are wrong and evil.
Racial integration equals "Racial Slop".
Human word is neither deed nor product,
but a counterfeit representation of value.
Humans are worshipers of fictitious word.
Via invention of word, humans exist as
WORD ANIMALS, invented a word god in
their likeness, then created a Word World.

Christianity is subservient to the Jews. The
Bible is Jewish, Academia and Government
based upon the Jewish Bible are Jewish.
Religion absolves adults of their obligation
to preserve natural resources required for children during their lifetimes. Adult god is anti-child.
Brown University has banned Nature's
Harmonic Time Cube as "Forbidden
Truth Knowledge" for they cannot allow
it to become known to their students.
I offer evil ass Harvard students $10,000.00
to disprove Nature's Cubic Creation Principle.
*********************************

Show post

grondilu #psychoceramics #psycho incels.co

Who pays the medical staff during childbirth ?

I'm still angry at that thread with a screenshot of a female looking down on us saying it's just natural selection at work that prevents us to have sex or integrate society.

I argued that it's not natural selection, it's sexual selection. That natural selection would be for instance letting pregnant women on their own during delivery.

I had never really thought about it, but isn't it true that in most developed countries, childbirth is highly medicalized and subsidized by the government in some way ?

Shouldn't this female be concerned about this blatant violation of natural selection ? I'm sick of these double standards. Women only invoke arguments when it benefits them.

If anyone should pay for the delivery of a child, it should be the parents, not strangers. Especially if those strangers will likely never have children on their own.

Otherwise, it's just cuckolding. Because paying for someone else's offspring is cuckolding, pretty much by definition.

Show post

ColdLightOfDay #psychoceramics incels.co

Why are humans the only animal to have such variation in physical attractiveness?

I just cannot understand this facet of evolution, it makes absolutely no sense to me. Why, when I look at any other animal, like bears, wolves, rabbits, snakes, squirrels, fish, lizards, birds, moles, worms and platypuses do they all have some semblance of continuity in physical attributes? Then when I look at human males and the disparity between gigachads and truecels they look like a different a totally different species to each other.

What is going on here? Most animals of the same species have at least the same skull shape and the facial differences are minor at most. A human can be 5’2 with a skeletal frame, potbelly and a bird skull whilst within the same species, even the same race within the species, can in contrast be 6’6 with a titan frame and a perfectly formed warrior skull. What sorcery is this? It would be a biological marvel if it wasn’t so ridiculously horrifying.

Show post

David J. Stewart #fundie #psychoceramics jesus-is-savior.com

Five - The Number of Death?

In dealing with the Five Points of Calvinism, It is certainly fitting that five is the number of death, so the Five Points of Calvinism will kill anything near it. Just as it takes no keen intellect to see that five is the biblical number of death, so no insight is necessary, other than an ability to read the Bible, to see the flagrant perversion that the Five Points of Calvinism make of Holy Scripture. Satan, the angel of death is the fifth cherub (Ezek 28:14) and has the power of death (Heb 2:14). The first man dies in Genesis 5:5.

In Acts 5:5, Ananias dies after being asked five questions about his sin. "The wages of sin is death" -Rom 6:23. Paul was whipped five times (2nd Corinthians 11:24). Jesus Christ had five wounds. In Revelation chapter five, we see the Lamb that was slain (Rev 5). During the Tribulation, locusts will torment men for five months (Rev 9:5) until they seek death (Rev 9:6). When the fifth seal was opened, John saw under the altar the souls of them that were slain (Rev 6:9).

There were five men stoned in the Bible that died. The "sin unto death" is in 1st John five. The greatest chapter in the Bible on death, describing two men whose deaths affected all humanity, is Romans chapter five. Even the word "death" contains five letters. When David went forth to kill the giant Goliath, he carried with him five smooth stones.

It is in the fifth book of the New Testament, in the fifth verse, of the fifth chapter where we read, "And Ananias hearing these words fell down, and gave up the ghost: and great fear came on all them that heard these things." More than a coincidence? You decide!

Show post

Warmest Black #psychoceramics incels.co

[SuicideFuel] Saw a balding nordic pheno soy subhuman today with a gf

I feel like a scientist or sociologist studying an exotic tribe in the dark continents. I just want to observe this human being in his natural habitat. Just what was it that allowed this subhuman tatted up soyboy to acquire such a qt 3.14 with tight bod? It didn't appear he was a betabux as they were shopping together for groceries, seems like an egalitarian arrangement. Maybe he statusmaxxed and is in a band or something? I'll never know. Tbh I just want to ask him how. I'm sure he'd tell me it's his personality, a personality instinguishable from the million other individuals who look, talk, and act like him. Sometimes I wonder if it is just luck and circumstance. If it's social circle game, if it's mentall illness on the female's behalf. Whatever it is, I'll never know.

Jfl @ the blkpill sometimes.

Show post

Akhnai #psychoceramics incels.co

[Serious] Muh personality is very easy to debunk

If personality do get you laid,then we wont make fun on nice guys.

The existence of a meme culture making fun of a man who act according to conventional morality to woo a foid indicates that it is a failed dating strategy.

"We laugh at nice guys because their niceness are not genuine"
That is bullshit.Most human beings act nice not because an inherent understanding of a transendental morality but because they want to curry favour with other people.

But niceguys are singled out because their attempts failed to accomplish anything other than making them look like a bunch of retards

Show post

Wizardcel #sexist #psychoceramics incels.co

[Serious] Why is America so obsessed with " muh personality"?

Bluepilled ameritards believe that your reason for failing to attract a woman is your personality. This is absurd. I've never seen a woman complimenting a man's personality or talking about his personality to her friends. On the other hand, women always talk about how hot a guy is. I don't know why Americans fall for the personality meme. America needs to stop reading self-help books and going to therapy; it's about time burgers joined the real world.

There's no such thing as a shitty personality if the guy's good-looking. @Reddit_is_for_cucks @FACEandLMS and others have proved this again and again.

I guess short guys don't have good personalities.
[video titled “When the Tsar Black Pill Bomba hits a bluepilled short black guy”]

Show post

JD Cowan #fundie #conspiracy #psychoceramics brianniemeier.com

One thing I've been convinced of in recent years is that the Satanic Panic was a psyop. Puritan Evangelicals and Catholics fell into the trap and ended up carrying water for degenerates in power.

Now the Church's in influence is worse than ever, but those in charge are still engaged in the same debauchery and evil they always were. But only the first gets dunked on by midwit Xers and Ys while the other should have total control of their lives. It worked out too conveniently for those in power.

Not to mention, when you look up most of these cases there are always things that don't add up. Son of Sam was certainly a group yet despite mysterious deaths after Berkowitz's capture no one has ever done digging on who Sam Carr actually was. Then there's this bonkers story that never made any sort of sense but somehow tunnel evidence was never found before this? Oh and we still don't know who killed Epstein.

Said the idiot, "Hollywood and the media lied to me about everything, except Religion. That was the one thing they were 100% correct on."

This revelation should have been obvious.

As an aside, I've been scanning articles from when Gen Y became lumped in with Millennials, and the admittance that they were separate groups but were pushed into one for convenience repeatedly came up around 2000. This was because Ys were getting older and Millennials were so different they needed a new name. Even though they admit the two are different they still prefer to lump them together. Mostly because they didn't care about Ys anymore.

Show post

Dave Blount #psychoceramics moonbattery.com

[From "Two Gaping Holes in Evolutionary Theory"]

It is a central pillar of liberal dogma that evolutionary theory explains amazingly complex lifeforms, which evolved through random mutation and natural selection in a universe devoid of design or purpose. Two major cracks threaten to bring this pillar down: the Cambrian explosion and the DNA enigma.

Not even the most militant nihilists can use evolution to explain the profusion of new lifeforms that appeared as if from nowhere 530 million years ago. Still more problematic is the fact that DNA sequences capable of creating stable proteins are extremely rare.

Molecular biologist Douglas Axe has shown that for every DNA sequence that generates a short functional protein, there are 10 to the 77th power possible sequences that are nonfunctional. There are 10 to the 65th power atoms in the galaxy. This gives an idea of the odds that random mutation is responsible for life in all its ingenious complexity. The earth has only been around for 4.5 billion years. If random mutation worked, it would take many trillions of years to produce something as complicated as slime mold.

Show post

d p #conspiracy #fundie #psychoceramics #god-complex youtube.com

[Keep in mind that this was on a YouTube video of the song “The Sound of Silence.”]

I got this version on my Spotify liked list, I just noticed today that somehow I got the original version which is too slow for me, but this version it's gives you that GODLY-LIKE strength and energy , then I tried searching for this particular version on Spotify it just gives you that stupid version of disturbed and that other slow version which has no heart to it in it, man that's already prove and evidence enough to see the government is controlling everything, like separating us the PEOPLE from the REAL GOD, brainwashing and manipulating us with that fantasy story about Jesus Christ the son of God, GOD exists just not their version, GOD ain't a being that's up in the sky watching you and judging you, GOD is every where, in us, outside of us, were just drowning in ENERGY Here planet Earth, it's just waiting for some one to come and claim GOD, you see GOD ain't GOD, UNLESS there's a pilot to take control and drive it, YOU are considered a GOD when you manipulate the ENERGY and make things go your WAY, no I'm not talking about that X MEN AVENGERS SUPER HERO BS ! im talking about when everything All of a sudden goes your way , for example if someone tried to kill you just a regular pathetic human beings as ourselves,. They wouldn't even see the next day, you can heal your own body, you don't need to depend on no DRs, and this power is for anyone, no such thing as no human could get that much power cause they'll use it for evil and take advantage of the people, fuck no that ain't true and to even have that power you would have to go through so much shit, I'm talking about being isolated from the world literally, no sex, no friends no going out trying to get at girls, no partying, just you and your SHADOW ( SOUL) AND TRUST me it's a very very DARK WORLD, you will unleash the other side of you, but that's if you don't end up commiting suicide,. Due to the pain and suffering that you have to go through to become a GOD, naturally were supposed to evolve into it. but the evil organization of the world don't And won't allow us, that's y theres Manipulation of the weather, religious organizations , jobs, make you work like a slave,. Clubs sex, drugs, MONEY ! so much fucking attractions and entertainments in this fucking that I can't relate to a single soul here on Earth, it feels so lonely and depressing that I do drugs to escape this reality I'm going through, all my friends which I have only 3, got addicted to it and lost it within 2 years just doing meth, here I am going on 11 years of doing meth and I still haven't lost my mind, I know what I talk about, I know my experience I went through way before I started doing meth, my bad y'all just needed to vent, I hold so much in me, that I almost want to die not kill myself lol cause I don't have the balls to get a gun and blow my brains out, I'm just taking hit after another, that's why if I ever do for some miracle unleash myself, im going all out and taking all my anger and rage on a particular organization.

Show post

Ancience #ufo #psychoceramics #fundie #conspiracy godlikeproductions.com

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. was a repentant reptilian

Robert F. Kennedy jr. was the incarnation of a repentant reptilian called Endri-Gakama, son of Enki, one of the 5 reptilians to not descend from Enki's brother Reptillianus. Endri-Gakama was the father of Lam, the father of Ubaru, the father of Tubaru, the father of Tebiris, the mother of Nimrod, Semiramis (her reincarnation) and Canaan; Lam, Ubaru, Tubaru, & Tebiris being the other 4 reptilians who did not descend from Reptillianus.

Robert Kennedy Sr. was Archangel Michael incarnate.

All fallen angels had elements to their being that did not have the potential to want to fall if these elements were to be separated from the rest of them, unlike the rest of them. These elements were separated from the rest of them, otherwise, they would have fallen. Even Lucifer had elements that were separated from him before his fall. The good elements of Lucifer answer to the term Lucy. After most of Satan repents and gets transferred to Lucy (if Satan were as large as 1,000,000 universees, the amount that remains would be a couple of inches), Lucy incarnates as an andromedan, repentant elements of Abaddon are transferred to him after becoming Lucifer again rather than Abaddon, he dies, gets infused with Archangel Chamuel's soul energy, and incarnates as John F. Kennedy.

John F. Kennedy was Lucifer-Chamuel.

JFK Jr. was an advanced human soul, a true christian, equal to the angels.

Patrick Kennedy (JFK"s son who died shortly after being born) was the incarnation of an Ophanic Archangel called Conciel, nicknamed Cicciel.

Show post

‘Uncle Mikey’ #psychoceramics projectavalon.net

Eukaryotic Cell Biology vs. The Tabernacle in the Wilderness


At the Organelle Scale of the Kingdom of God Within, we find ourselves at the Tabernacle in the Wilderness.

The Tabernacle (Mishkan) was the first dwelling place for God in Scripture...

John 1:14
"And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth"

See that?

The Word was made flesh and became the Tabernacle.

When we studied the Word of God at the Molecular Scale, we saw that the Words...

Adenine
Cytosine
Guanine
Thymine

...became DNA.

DNA eventually forms our Temples, that is to say... our Bodies...

1 Corinthians 6:19
"What? know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost which is in you, which ye have of God, and ye are not your own?"

That's right.

Tabernacles and Temples in Scripture, represent Human Bodies.

In fact, when studying the descriptions given to Moses on how to build the Tabernacle in the Wilderness, we find that they truly do describe a Body.

Oh, but not the kind of Body we generally think of when we hear that word.

No.

Remember...

Scripture is a book of Mysteries Revealed.

The kind of Body Scripture has revealed to us is only the size of a Biological Cell!

A Eukaryote Cell to be exact...

"A eukaryote is any organism whose cells contain a nucleus and other organelles enclosed within membranes"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eukaryote

A Eukaryote Cell is what we Humans start of as, after the Moment of Conception.

This first cell is called a Zygote ("joined" or "yoked") formed by a fertilization event between two gametes...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zygote

The Zygote eventually splits and multiplies to form specific types of Cells...

Acts 12:24
"But the word of God grew and multiplied"

By some estimates, there are approximately 216 different types of Cells in the Human Body such as Nerve Cells, Muscle Cells, Blood Cells, Organ Cells, etc.

Remember...

6 * 6 * 6 = 216

So who's body does the Tabernacle belong to?

Hebrews 10:20
"By a new and living way, which he hath consecrated for us, through the veil, that is to say, his flesh"

Jesus Christ of course.

Thus, we see that the Messiah was conceived by God and the Israelites in the desert and nurtured as they wandered for forty years.

Note that forty weeks is how long a typical pregnancy is...

Numbers 11:12
"Have I conceived all this people? have I begotten them, that thou shouldest say unto me, Carry them in thy bosom, as a nursing father beareth the sucking child, unto the land which thou swarest unto their fathers?"

Lol.

You kinda sorta did there Moses! (Metaphorically speaking of course).

So think about this for a moment. If we use a bit of logic we come to the realization that the Tabernacle is also a picture of Mary's pregnancy!

image

Now...

Because there are so many types of Cells to study, we will use this generic version found on Wikipedia...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organelle

...in order to focus on the various components or Organelles.

In the proceeding chapters, we will see how these molecules have combined to become what Biologists call "Organelles".

These Organelles match up precisely with the components of the Tabernacle in the Wilderness...

image

image

The Ark of the Covenant represents the Nucleolus. This is where the story of DNA begins.

The Most Holy Place represents the Nucleus and Chromatin, where the Chromosomes are.

The Covering of 23 Skins represents the Rough Endoplasmic Reticulum.

The Veil separating the Holy Place from the Most Holy Place represents the Nuclear Membrane.

The Cherubim sewn onto the Veil represent Chromatin and Chromosomes.

The Parting of the Veil represents Nuclear Pores.

The Sprinkling of Blood represents Ribosomes.

The Smooth Endoplasmic Reticulum represents the Brazen Altar.

The Mitochondrion represents the Candlestick, sometimes called the Menorah.

The Table of Shewbread represents the Golgi Apparatus.

The Altar of Incense represents Vesicles.

The Brazen Laver represents Cytoplasm.

The Twin Corner Pillars (on West Wall) represent Centrosomes.

The Various Frames, Bars, Ropes, etc. represent the Cytoskeleton.

The Food Offerings represent Vacuoles.

The Pans, Shovels, Waste, etc. represent Lysosomes.

The Courtyard Fence represents the Outer Cell Membrane.

Etc.

Again, we will cover these in more detail as we go along.

¤=[Post Update]=¤

We begin our Organelle journey within the Heart of it all... the Ark of the Covenant.

The Ark of the Covenant can be found inside the Most Holy Place and represents the Nucleolus.

The Nucleolus is found inside the Cell Nucleus (the round purple area in our Generic Cell Diagram).

Something important worth mentioning here is that the Ark really consists of two parts...

The square 'box' where Holy Items are stored, and the Mercy Seat or 'lid' so to speak (where the Two Cherubim are).

We will get to the Mercy Seat in a bit.

Inside the Ark, we find three items...

Two Tables of the Testimony (AKA Ten Commandments)
The Golden Pot of Manna
Aaron's Rod that Budded

How these compare with a Nucleolus is so spot-on, it quickly becomes apparent that this is not just mere coincidence.

In fact, all of the Tabernacle Furniture matches up with Cell Organelles in ways that are so obvious (even to a Fourth Grader) one has to wonder why this isn't a mainstream teaching in Church Sermons all across the globe.

Is there a 'cover-up' to hide this information?

You be the judge.

Let's start with this slide of the Ark Contents...

image

Hebrews 9:4
"Which had the golden censer, and the ark of the covenant overlaid round about with gold, wherein was the golden pot that had manna, and Aaron's rod that budded, and the tables of the covenant"

In the slide we see that the Two Tables of the Testimony, or Ten Commandments matches up with Nucleobases.

The Golden Pot of Manna matches up with Deoxyribose.

Aaron's Rod that Budded matches up with the Phosphorus Backbone or the 'Serpent' strands we see in a typical representation of DNA.

We will study each of these components in more detail in order to have good understanding of what they are and how they relate to one another.

Just about everyone has heard of Moses and the Ten Commandments, and so the first item on our list is one of the most easily recognizable...

image

Exodus 31:18
"And he gave unto Moses, when he had made an end of communing with him upon mount Sinai, two tables of testimony, tables of stone, written with the finger of God"

The Two Tables were written on by God himself.

They literally are the Word of God.

Every single living Cell contains something similar called 'Nucleobases'.

As we learned in a previous chapter, Nucleobases are the 'Words' that form all life as we know it...

John 1:14
"And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth"

They are also called 'Nitrogenous Bases' because Nitrogen is the primary Element they are made of.

Thus, the "Stone with Seven Eyes" or Seven Electrons (mentioned in Zechariah 3:9), is the Chemical Element Nitrogen...

image

Zechariah 3:9
"For behold the stone that I have laid before Joshua; upon one stone shall be seven eyes: behold, I will engrave the graving thereof, saith the LORD of hosts, and I will remove the iniquity of that land in one day"

Nitrogen is Element Seven in the Periodic Table of Elements...

image

Now we see why Seven is God's favorite number!

Notice the Stone with Seven Eyes has an engraving on it?

The engraving would be the Word of God...

A = Adenine
C = Cytosine
G = Guanine
T = Thymine

Once the Stone with Seven Eyes has been engraved, it now become a Nucleobase.

Note that Zerubbabel, who is mentioned in Zechariah, may be one of God's Top Bioengineers as he is privy to much of this highly advanced information...

Zechariah 4:10
"For who hath despised the day of small things? for they shall rejoice, and shall see the plummet in the hand of Zerubbabel with those seven; they are the eyes of the LORD, which run to and fro through the whole earth"

These Words/Nucleobases eventually combine to form something called RNA.

That brings us to Aaron's Rod that Budded...

Show post

Anonymous Coward #psychoceramics #falseflag godlikeproductions.com

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_in_the_World

There is A LOT of false information in this link about freedom in the world!!!!

A LOT of those countries are a lot freer and also quite freer then they say because THIS WIKIPEDIA PAGE IS GIVING INFORMATION ABOUT HOW FREE COUNTRIES ARE THAT ARE NOT THE COUNTRIES THAT THEY SAY THEY ARE, and so that is how the information about a lot of those countries is FALSE because those countries are not even those countries AT ALL because obviously if they are pretending to be those countries then that means that they are NOT those countries all together!

If you went to the real planet Earth you would have billions of people telling you that they have never even heard of Russia LOL, because there is no Russia on the real planet Earth AT ALL, there is no Ukraine at all ether and same with Belarus and Moldova, everything that shows a Russia, Ukraine, Belarus and Moldova is completely fake information and the pictures that show those countries physically existing are pictures that were created by the use of PHOTOSHOP.

There IS a Czech Republic on the real planet Earth and it is a completely free country but it is not called Czech Republic... and it is quite a lot bigger then how big your FAKE Czech Republic photoshops itself to look and makes itself to look with false information combined with bits of information copied off of real information, LOL

Show post

KABOOM THE MOONS #psychoceramics godlikeproductions.com

Jesus escaped the underworld/under the dome/hollow earth/land of the dead and got resurrected, when Humans will escape?

Well humans are not even aware they live in the underworld, that their sky is the actual surface of their planet, that like skynet they died/got murdered before they were born, just like in mythology, you have to die first before you enter hades/underworld/inner earth.

Show post

BrendioEEE #sexist #psychoceramics incels.co

[Experiment] What Exactly Is Losing Your Virginity?

From data I have read, personally, I think a man loses his virginity when he participates in physical sexual relations with a human being, and a female loses her virginity when she loses her sexual innocence, period, in any capacity, because whenever that happens we can correlate negative effects, but how about some hypothetical questions i'd like the answer to.

Question 1: So, obviously you can lose your virginity to a female who doesn't love you or want to be with you, whether that be pity sex, prostitution, rape, etc, but sex toys don't count as losing your virginity because it lacks sentience, or is the fact that it's not a human female? If a fleshlight/sex toy existed in the future that was a genetically cloned part of a females body, fully functioning, whether it be a mouth, a vagina, an ass, etc, but it's not actually a sentient human being, just a cloned body part kept alive and functional for sex using advanced technology, is that losing your virginity?

You would be having sex with a human females mouth/anus/vagina/breasts/etc but there would be no sentience. If the answer is no that doesn't count then let's move onto Question 2.

Question 2: Would having sex with a dead body count as losing your virginity? This is not a cloned human, this is a dead body, a real human body, does it not count because the person is not alive, and if it doesn't count because they're not alive, wouldn't a cloned body part created for sexual purposes count because it actually is alive? Or does it need to be both alive and sentient for it count, and obviously there is no sentience in a dead body.

Question 3: Does having sex with someone who is asleep/passed out/in a coma count as losing your virginity? What if they aren't dreaming and lack sentience? Such as being brain dead? If the answer is yes having sex with someone in this scenario counts, what is the difference between having sex with flesh that is unconscious that is cloned specifically for sexual purposes and having sex with someone who perhaps is passed out and there is minimal brain activity/sentience.

Question 4: Does having sex with an animal count as losing your virginity? If the answer is no, why? Is it because it is not human, or because it is not intelligent, or both? Would having sex with an intelligent animal/an animal that might have an IQ similar to the most lower ends of the human IQ spectrum, such as a dolphin, gorilla, or elephant, etc count? What about a genetically engineered animal that looks exactly like an animal, and has the genetics of an animal, but has been genetically modified to not only have an intelligence similar to ours, but be able to talk and communicate with a voice and your language?

Question 5: Does having sex with a robot/artificial intelligence count as losing your virginity? If the answer is no is it because it's not a human? Is it because it might not be as intelligent as a human? What if it was simulated intelligence and not actually real intelligence (As in an algorithim advanced enough to trick you into believing what you are talking to is intelligent but in reality it isn't), What if it was as intelligent and had a synthentic body that was almost identical to that of a human? If the answer is no this doesn't count, why would you say that when in some cases/scenarios, you may be having sex with a synthetic AI female, and might not even realize it is a synthetic AI female? If you didn't know it was a synth/robot, and genuinely thought it was a human, does that mean you lost your virginity?

What if you thought you lost your virginity in the future and posted about ascending on a future Incel forum, only to find out years later what you ascended with was actually a synthetic AI female, would you be allowed to get back on the forum, @Staff can chime in on this.

Question 6: If the reason why a robot/artificial intelligence/synth doesn't count as losing your virginity is because it is artificial and not real, what about a genetically modified/genetically engineered human/humanoid created from the ground up? This has DNA and, in some cases it may be 100% human? What would be the difference? What about a catgirl/other genetically engineered humanoids? Would they count? Would they only count if they weren't genetically modified to be open to having sex/loving anyone? What is the criteria here?

Question 7: If other intelligence life exists, such as Aliens/Demons/An intelligence species of this realm we are not aware of exists, but they are not human, and you have sex with them, does that count as losing your virginity? If the answer is yes, what would be the difference between that and having sex with an intelligent animal, or an intelligent artificial intelligence/genetically engineered species? What if we find out they we were created through genetic engineering by another species, or other beings that exist were created by a separate species/god like being?

Question 8: If you had sex in Full Dive VR, as in Virtual Reality that is neurally linked with your brain at such a level, that any simulation you experience within it will be in many cases indistinguishable and in some cases even better than reality itself, would that count as losing your virginity? If the answer is no, is it because you would likely be having sex with artificial intelligence and not other humans? Is it because you're not having sex with your own body? What if you meet an actual female in virtual reality, who is connecting to it from somewhere else on earth, and she actually has sex with you in the virtual world and it feels exactly like it would in real life, if not even better? Would that count?

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I could probably come up with some other scenarios, but I think we might be regurgitating a bit and not discussing anything of worth, please I would love to discuss this further, this may be important philosophically, especially for Inceldom.

Show post

360_no_cope #psychoceramics #sexist incels.co

[Blackpill] Women created incels

During evolution men and women differed. Men developed abilities like physical strength and intellectual planning (the alpha and beta characteristics, although I don't like these terms). Women developed beauty.

Perhaps women developed beauty because they thought that men would rather bring resources to a hot woman than a normal one. Who knows. I can believe that most men just want a pussy. But the thirst for beauty was strong in women, and in the end this attribute would become more devastating than we would realize.

As our dominion over the earth grew, we arrived at modern society. Now we could buy a nourishing meal for 3€ pocket change, and governments would offer actual money (welfare) to you. Due to physical dominion over the earth and the planned distribution networks of resources - men's work - physical survival was all but guaranteed.

But when men beat evolution, rather than congratulate them, or even reward them, women took a step back.

Having seemingly done away with the need to fight for survival, the women of the human race put that competition squarely back on the table, on their own accord. As if the crueller side of evolution was something to be continued, a fun game!

Hence the dating market as we know it. Hence incels.

It's like the industrial revolution never happened. The wheel was never invented. Women purposefully keep the dating market scarce like in the dark ages. That means playing with men's emotions, and COMING UP WITH EXCUSE REJECTIONS FOR COMPLETELY GOOD MEN.

Women themselves live on attention. They have accumulated so much beauty in however many thousands of years we have evolved that they can keep living off of that attention, like a guy with 1 million can live off just the interest. Positive attention gives validation. But even negative attention helps them. As the physically weaker gender attention and catcalling can make women wary, and lower their libido - which is the end goal anyway.

Women have additionally evolved (at least culturally) to be the choosers in the human dating dynamic, while men are the approachers. What this means is that if women were the approachers, and then chose to not approach 80% of the men, the incel phenomenon would be more noticeable. Now it's not visible.

Show post

Gary Croft #magick #psychoceramics #mammon primesdemystified.com

image

Hidden deep within this sieve, a radical spin on modulo 30 wheel factorization, are mysteriously beautiful symmetries and geometries, profound in their implications. This sieve not only forms the basis of an extremely efficient and widely used prime number sieving algorithm of the 'non-probabilistic' kind, but it demonstrates how prime numbers are distributed within a radial geometry that effectively defragments the Ulam Spiral and ultimately leads us to "the theory of everything."

[...]

Show post

gzusfreke #fundie #psychoceramics whywontgodhealamputees.com

Jesus was fully human and fully God. He was not the product of human sperm and human egg. He was the product of a human egg, "the seed of a woman", and the Holy Spirit. The sin nature was bypassed by bypassing the human father. Human embryos can have a different blood type from the mother, and this factors into the sinlessness of Jesus, according to some theologians.

Show post

Steve Frei #psychoceramics youtube.com

[On a video of a natural phenomenon known as a “green flash.”]

You idiots, all thrilled by a green flash? It means the sun is white hot now, instead of yellow. Have you no understanding at all of the color spectrum? Global warming has a cause, and it's not C02! It is the white hot sun. Open your eyes.

Show post

Christ/Einstein reincarnated #psychoceramics #dunning-kruger #ufo #fundie #god-complex godlikeproductions.com

Stephen Hawking was WRONG about GOD, the Afterlife, and More

Stephen Hawking was wrong about (A) there being no GOD or God-incarnate, (B) there being random bubble universes and parallel worlds, (C) the BIG Bang-Bit Bang was a random event, (D) we should avoid making contact with aliens, (E) "There is no afterlife - it's a fairytale. The brain is like an old computer where you just throw it away." (F) The Universe is our perception of The Matrix as a 2-dimensional hologram that projects our reality.

Hawking was right about (G) there being a Theory of Everything: Supergravity Theory/M-Theory's 7D hyperspace + 4D = 11 dimensions spacetime. Yet, it's incomplete.

(A) GOD & God-incarnate have been proven in many ways including GOD=7_4 Theory.

(B & C) The BIG Bang-Bit Bang was a supermassive white hole - expansion of energy and information 13.8 billion years ago - spawned by a supermassive black hole at the heart of a galaxy in our parent universe. This Universe is 1-in-2 trillion offspring each with similar inherited physical constants.

(D) Aliens are cool. We shouldn't be scared of them and they shouldn't be scared of us. Although, we should both be very cautious of each other.

(E) Science has proven reincarnation (google that). The great American scientist Benjamin Franklin believed in it and he conducted an experiment with his Autobiography being written as a manual for his reincarnated self as a child. This book was one of five that the young Abraham Lincoln had access to when he was a boy in Indiana.

(F) This Universe is an omniscient quantum computer where particles not only collide, they compute.

Hawking's analogy of the brain being like an old computer is incorrectly portrayed. Everyone takes the valuable information from an old computer and transfers the data into the new one or stores it on a hard drive/flashdrive/The Cloud. Now the truth of the analogy supports reincarnation.

(G) Unified Strings 21 or 19 Dimensions & Aspects of Spacetime provides an analysis of one-dimensional time and thus a very simple symmetry. There are 7 aspects of regular time: beginning, end, past, present, future, the void(?), and a constant - the speed of light in a vacuum. There are 4 aspects of hypertime: fast-forward, reverse, pause/stop, and before the beginning and after the end. The 12th aspect of time is imaginary time, but it doesn't apply here.

Show post

GreekSymmetrics #sexist #psychoceramics reddit.com

Why are modern urologists/endocrinologists so misandristic and ignorant?

Claiming that a 4 Inch length 2 Inch girth penis is normal and totally acceptable….

Just lol at any "doctor" who denies the importance of sexual dimorphism

since when did emotions and gynocentric/liberal ideologies became more valued than Cold rational Facts?

A guy with a 4 Inch length and 2 Inch girth penis will get terrified and socially belittled by almost every sexual Encounters, he might find a Woman for a Long term relationship were emotional and financial support primarily matters, but sexually wise he will never be a raw satisfaction, he will never be able to have truly satisfying ONS, he will be the typical long term relationship provider who's considered by over 30 women when their sexual wild years are over


No sex toys, creativity, communication or Position will ever be able to compensate for the lack of a well sized dimorphic human male penis

Thats literally just a meme created by the feministic 68s Generation who tried to make sex into a eloquent science

for hundred thousands of years humans relied on the typical Basic primitive in and out game during sex (of Course only strong men with a relatively large penis had Access to sex, weak unmasculine men were simply wiped out of the genepool), but now suddenly in the 20th century a Generation of "sexual experts" wants to tell us that Women's sexuality is far more than just Basic Penetration, and that women actually hate Basic vaginal sex because they are magical complex sexual beings who prefer a intuitive sensual romantic twink who can effectively hit her 230830248 errogenous spots over a strong primitive masculine man


But no no no, penis size and masculine dimorphism doesnt matter, every Woman is a lesbian anyways

It's About personality, humans especially women are complex individual beings who have a complex individual sexuality, women dont want brutish vaginal Penetration with a large thick penis, no no they want a feministic feminine man with a small penis who's totally fine in making himself to a submissive lesbian by only Performing oral sex

Women dont want to be dominated, it just happens so that 98% of women want a Partner who's taller then themselves teehee


Such Arguments are basically Nothing else than human narcissism in a nutshell, this whole "Sexual dimorphism does not matter women want nice Kind husbands" nonsense is just a direct proof that most humans on this earth totally lack self awareness

Claiming that women and men are both complex individuals, and that Basic primitive natural dimorphic traits dont matter since it's all About "Personality and communication"

We are one evolutionary stage higher than a caveman… And we still Claim that humans are non-primitive morally superior individual beings….


This here basically describes 95% of all modern urological/endocrinological "doctors"
image

TranscriptPhysician labelled “Dr. Cuck”: “Trust me, it's totally normal to have a 16 inch bideltoid as a full grown male along with a 3 inch penis and peanut sized testicles. My junk and boy is also not bigger but my wife still loves me We hadnt had sex since 5 years but thats ok since tyrone does a better job than me anyways

And stay away from that toxic testosterone (BTW if you want some estrogen I can quickly prescribe it to you)”

btw if you want to get some urological and sexual Facts from A REAL RATIONAL BASED urologist/andrologist then visit the Website of the austrian urologist"Dr Georg Pfau" he's an extremely based doctors who doesnt care About liberalistic or feministic Moral constructs but only About Cold rational facts

Show post

Anonymous Coward #ufo #conspiracy #psychoceramics godlikeproductions.com

[Re. Why space aliens are supposedly visiting Earth]

They want our DNA?

Well, I'll tell you something you don't want to hear. You wonder about the actual truth behind this stuff. But you'll scoff at the actual truth, because its something you don't want to hear. You already have your glorified pre-assumed ideas of what it must be all about. But the truth is not like you imagined.

They want children of their own. But they don't have women, and were never intended to have women or children. Only women can be reproduced with. The earth is the only place in the universe that has women.

We're scum to them. Useless. Not worth their time. Except, they feel they've been screwed over. Women and children were given to scum like humans. But these good things were not given to high glorious beings like themselves, who feel they're much more deserving.

They can reproduce with women, and have in the past. But its been forbidden for them to do so. Dire, dreadful consequences for reproducing with women that they certainly do not in any way want.

They want our DNA (altered by them, of course) to reproduce with women. Because it gives them children. But its not technically reproducing with women, in the traditional sense. So they're able to get their children, and work around the penalty for it.

The children appear closer to humans to us, than the visitors. But there are aspects about them, both inside and outside, that are very "not right." They're beings that should have never existed.

Do the visitors deserve to have children? Are they wrong for acquiring them in the way they do? I don't know. But I'm not the one to judge.

Show post

MedwedianPresident_3 #sexist #homophobia #wingnut #psychoceramics #conspiracy reddit.com

[OP of "Feminism, Adultery and Homosexuality are Dysgenic"]

We all know that the Cathedral openly promotes anti-natural inclinations to feminism, adultery and especially the perversions of homosexuality. The level of brainwashing in mainstream media and education has reached levels that are ridiculously laughable (e.g. actually comical) to intelligent people.

It is true that one of the reasons for this is the War on the Family - by destroying marriage and friendship, the state atomizes society in order to make it more manageable. People whose only social connection is that to the state make it easier to set up an Orwellian tyranny.

Nevertheless, after examining the problem throughoutly, I think that there is one, more alarming, reason behind it, namely the attempt to reduce birth rates among certain groups.

Feminist women do not marry and consider children "parasites" - if they become pregnant for some reason, it is likely that they will commit infanticide before the child is born. Childlessness is prevalent not only among open third-wave feminists but also among all sorts of "emancipated" or "career women".

As women frequently utilize men to get pregnant, file for divorce quickly and then demand support, men are discouraged from marrying and having children because they can't know that they won't become "money donkeys".

Adultery, e.g. early and premarital promiscuity and the great frequency of intercourse alienates copulation from its only natural purpose, reproduction. The broad acceptance and even encouragement of adultery promotes not only contraceptives but also abortions as the "deed" is completely separated from the will to have children.

Combined with feminism, adultery has contributed to the fact that it is nowadays unacceptable for women to bear children before 30, and to have more than two or three children. This drastically reduces birth rates.

The problem with homosexuality is not only that it further contributes to adultery and promiscuity but also that it is an anti-biological form of cohabitation. Sexual deviants have to resort to adoption or artificial fertilization to have children, which is significantly harder than what a man and a woman would have to do if they wished to have a child. This means that birth numbers are also lower among homosexuals.

It is interesting to see that these three deviances/ideologies are most prevalent within both the established liberal-academic elite (the middle-aged parts of which are primarily comprised of former hippies, subculture members or left-wing extremists) and its younger and poorer cousin, the urban boheme. These groups are increasingly displacing conservative but well-educated people.

As the true elite disminishes in size, it is increasingly replaced by individuals of ordinary or even subpar intelligence and ability thanks to the "equality"-driven college system which grants bonus points for members of ethnic minorities or children of proles.

What does this ultimatively lead to?

You're right, the median IQ and ability of the elite decreases with the proportion of the true biological elite.

In short: postmodernist society is slowly sawing off its head.

Show post

first loss #psychoceramics incels.co

[Serious] If personality mattered, we would be drowning in pussy

Whenever I meet a chad, I know what to expect. There is no suprises. There is no anything. He's just another faceless bluepilled slayer with a fabricated way of walking, talking, living basically. When you meet one chad, you have met them all.

On this forum, I have met some of the most unique people in my life. I'm not even joking. Every single one of you is unique in his own way.

We, incels, have that "personality" that cucked society always tells us that it "matters". We have it, yet we are alone and will die alone if we don't ascend by some miracle, which is high unlikely.

And that's why personality doesn't matter in the slightest.

Show post

Ropemaxx #psychoceramics incels.co

[Blackpill] "i see ugly guys with gfs all the time"

The reason you hear this cope all the time is because most guys have NO idea how to rate men, for obvious reasons(being straight). Sure a normal man can see the extreme cases like a sub2 or a gigachad with striking features, but alot of chads or chadlites are undercover. Ive done this mistake several times thinking a guy is ugly but then reading 1000s of youtube comments of women swooning over them i realized they were actually chads.
Examples :
Bill Skarsgard, Alex Rose, John Corbett, Jeremy Renner, the menendez brothers etc

Hell even some incels here think people like Gerald Butler or Ryan Gosling are not good looking.

Show post

genesistorevelation316 #fundie #psychoceramics genesistorevelation.home.blog

Fibonacci- God’s amazing sign of His supernaturality.

Fibonacci was a man born in ~1170. When he was to grow up, he was to discover an amazing thing that is an amazing sign of God- the Fibonacci sequence.

What is the Fibonacci sequence?

In the Fibonacci sequence, each number is the sum of the previous two numbers.

It starts out with 1, then 1 again, then 2, then 3, then 5 and so one. It results with something like this: 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 18, 31 etc.

Now, the number 7 is the number of perfection, completion. God makes the Universe in 6 days and rests of the 7th- the Universe is finished. In Exodus 22:30, God instructs that animals must be at least 7 days old before being used for sacrifice. God told Joshua to walk around Jericho for seven days, and on the seventh day to make seven circuits, and for seven priests to blow seven trumpets outside the city walls, to make Jericho fall.

If we add up the first 7 numbers of the Fibonacci sequence, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, we come to 33- the age Jesus was when He died, when He paid the penalty for sin. All I can say is WOW!!!

Show post

Arthas93 #sexist #psychoceramics incels.co

[Hypocrisy] The women earning/marriage paradox.

Woman only want to marry/have relationships/sex with handsome men who are also higher status and earn more money than them.

That is female hypergamy, and it dictates to them that they must be with the best Chads possible, and ignore all others.
Of course they will seek marriage with inferior beta cucks, when such thing benefits them. To string them along, not give them any sex, and have them pay their bills.

And at the same time fulfill their hypergamy, cucking the beta cuck, by seeking sex with Chads that are handsome, even thought some of those Chads may have less money/lesser social status than them, just because of the Chad's face/body appearance.

Seems like the perfect plan, right? The foid gets everything: She gets a beta cuck to wageslave and provide for her AND a handsome Chad for sex and social media attention/validation/envy from her female "friends". Both biological needs and social needs are fulfilled.

But there is one problem, the only flaw: women themselves.
Women also demand to be paid more, to have higher status jobs, to have female only teams, female only companies, female only director boards, etc. That ends up hurting men, they demand men to earn less, get less status.

The foid demands both: To have relationships with better men and demand for men to be treated worse.
The result of that paradox is what we see today: Endless Degeneracy.
Where foids keep chasing top men, while trying to take those men from the top.

Show post

Cuyen #psychoceramics incels.co

[Serious] Women and sex is not real

Just LOL at thinking they are real. there are scientist proofs that women and sex doesn't exist they are just things we make up in our brain, testosterone hormone makes us imagine them they are just in our brain. "but muh sex bro!" no fuck off don't believe others telling you sex is real also porns are not real lol they are just made up things for your imagination only gender is male
and "escortcels" dont come saying that you had sex and sex is real just jfl at you they put you in some simulation you paid for.

Show post

Eliezer Yudkowsky #psychoceramics #fundie lesswrong.com

The Dilemma: Science or Bayes?

"Eli: You are writing a lot about physics recently. Why?"

— Shane Legg (and several other people)

"In light of your QM explanation, which to me sounds perfectly logical, it seems obvious and normal that many worlds is overwhelmingly likely. It just seems almost too good to be true that I now get what plenty of genius quantum physicists still can't. [...] Sure I can explain all that away, and I still think you're right, I'm just suspicious of myself for believing the first believable explanation I met."

— Recovering irrationalist

RI, you've got no idea how glad I was to see you post that comment.

Of course I had more than just one reason for spending all that time posting about quantum physics. I like having lots of hidden motives, it's the closest I can ethically get to being a supervillain.

But to give an example of a purpose I could only accomplish by discussing quantum physics...

In physics, you can get absolutely clear-cut issues. Not in the sense that the issues are trivial to explain. But if you try to apply Bayes to healthcare, or economics, you may not be able to formally lay out what is the simplest hypothesis, or what the evidence supports. But when I say "macroscopic decoherence is simpler than collapse" it is actually strict simplicity; you could write the two hypotheses out as computer programs and count the lines of code. Nor is the evidence itself in dispute.

I wanted a very clear example—Bayes says "zig", this is a zag when it came time to break your allegiance to Science.

"Oh, sure," you say, "the physicists messed up the many-worlds thing, but give them a break, Eliezer! No one ever claimed that the social process of science was perfect. People are human; they make mistakes."

But the physicists who refuse to adopt many-worlds aren't disobeying the rules of Science. They're obeying the rules of Science.

The tradition handed down through the generations says that a new physics theory comes up with new experimental predictions that distinguish it from the old theory. You perform the test, and the new theory is confirmed or falsified. If it's confirmed, you hold a huge celebration, call the newspapers, and hand out Nobel Prizes for everyone; any doddering old emeritus professors who refuse to convert are quietly humored. If the theory is disconfirmed, the lead proponent publicly recants, and gains a reputation for honesty.

This is not how things do work in science; rather it is how things are supposed to work in Science. It's the ideal to which all good scientists aspire.

Now many-worlds comes along, and it doesn't seem to make any new predictions relative to the old theory. That's suspicious. And there's all these other worlds, but you can't see them. That's really suspicious. It just doesn't seem scientific.

If you got as far as RI—so that many-worlds now seems perfectly logical, obvious and normal—and you also started out as a Traditional Rationalist, then you should be able to switch back and forth between the Scientific view and the Bayesian view, like a Necker Cube.

So now put on your Science Goggles—you've still got them around somewhere, right? Forget everything you know about Kolmogorov complexity, Solomonoff induction or Minimum Message Lengths. That's not part of the traditional training. You just eyeball something to see how "simple" it looks. The word "testable" doesn't conjure up a mental image of Bayes's Theorem governing probability flows; it conjures up a mental image of being in a lab, performing an experiment, and having the celebration (or public recantation) afterward.

Science-Goggles on: The current quantum theory has passed all experimental tests so far. Many-Worlds doesn't make any new testable predictions—the amazing new phenomena it predicts are all hidden away where we can't see them. You can get along fine without supposing the other worlds, and that's just what you should do. The whole thing smacks of science fiction. But it must be admitted that quantum physics is a very deep and very confusing issue, and who knows what discoveries might be in store? Call me when Many-Worlds makes a testable prediction.

Science-Goggles off, Bayes-Goggles back on:

Bayes-Goggles on: The simplest quantum equations that cover all known evidence don't have a special exception for human-sized masses. There isn't even any reason to ask that particular question. Next!

Okay, so is this a problem we can fix in five minutes with some duct tape and superglue?

No.

Huh? Why not just teach new graduating classes of scientists about Solomonoff induction and Bayes's Rule?

Centuries ago, there was a widespread idea that the Wise could unravel the secrets of the universe just by thinking about them, while to go out and look at things was lesser, inferior, naive, and would just delude you in the end. You couldn't trust the way things looked—only thought could be your guide.

Science began as a rebellion against this Deep Wisdom. At the core is the pragmatic belief that human beings, sitting around in their armchairs trying to be Deeply Wise, just drift off into never-never land. You couldn't trust your thoughts. You had to make advance experimental predictions—predictions that no one else had made before—run the test, and confirm the result. That was evidence. Sitting in your armchair, thinking about what seemed reasonable… would not be taken to prejudice your theory, because Science wasn't an idealistic belief about pragmatism, or getting your hands dirty. It was, rather, the dictum that experiment alone would decide. Only experiments could judge your theory—not your nationality, or your religious professions, or the fact that you'd invented the theory in your armchair. Only experiments! If you sat in your armchair and came up with a theory that made a novel prediction, and experiment confirmed the prediction, then we would care about the result of the experiment, not where your hypothesis came from.

That's Science. And if you say that Many-Worlds should replace the immensely successful Copenhagen Interpretation, adding on all these twin Earths that can't be observed, just because it sounds more reasonable and elegant—not because it crushed the old theory with a superior experimental prediction—then you're undoing the core scientific rule that prevents people from running out and putting angels into all the theories, because angels are more reasonable and elegant.

You think teaching a few people about Solomonoff induction is going to solve that problem? Nobel laureate Robert Aumann—who first proved that Bayesian agents with similar priors cannot agree to disagree—is a believing Orthodox Jew. Aumann helped a project to test the Torah for "Bible codes", hidden prophecies from God—and concluded that the project had failed to confirm the codes' existence. Do you want Aumann thinking that once you've got Solomonoff induction, you can forget about the experimental method? Do you think that's going to help him? And most scientists out there will not rise to the level of Robert Aumann.

Okay, Bayes-Goggles back on. Are you really going to believe that large parts of the wavefunction disappear when you can no longer see them? As a result of the only non-linear non-unitary non-differentiable non-CPT-symmetric acausal faster-than-light informally-specified phenomenon in all of physics? Just because, by sheer historical contingency, the stupid version of the theory was proposed first?

Are you going to make a major modification to a scientific model, and believe in zillions of other worlds you can't see, without a defining moment of experimental triumph over the old model?

Or are you going to reject probability theory?

Will you give your allegiance to Science, or to Bayes?

Michael Vassar once observed (tongue-in-cheek) that it was a good thing that a majority of the human species believed in God, because otherwise, he would have a very hard time rejecting majoritarianism. But since the majority opinion that God exists is simply unbelievable, we have no choice but to reject the extremely strong philosophical arguments for majoritarianism.

You can see (one of the reasons) why I went to such lengths to explain quantum theory. Those who are good at math should now be able to visualize both macroscopic decoherence, and the probability theory of simplicity and testability—get the insanity of a global single world on a gut level.

I wanted to present you with a nice, sharp dilemma between rejecting the scientific method, or embracing insanity.

Why? I'll give you a hint: It's not just because I'm evil. If you would guess my motives here, think beyond the first obvious answer.

PS: If you try to come up with clever ways to wriggle out of the dilemma, you're just going to get shot down in future posts. You have been warned.

(Emphasis original)

Show post

Roko #fundie #psychoceramics #psycho rationalwiki.org

("Roko's Basilisk", an infamous post on LessWrong. It resulted in extreme distress in many of the readers. After four hours, cybercult leader Eliezer Yudkowsky purged the thread and all discussions of it, and would continue to delete any discussions of it for many years afterwards.)

Solutions to the Altruist's burden: the Quantum Billionaire Trick

Prerequisite concepts: Non-technical Introduction to the AI Deterrence Problem, And the winner is: Many-Worlds!

Followup to: The Altruist's Burden

One way to overcome the Altruist's burden problem is to stop being an altruist, to re-frame your impulses to help distant others as a bias rather than a preference. In the case of existential risks, there are additional reasons for doing this: firstly that the people who are helping you are the same as the people who are punishing you. (This is not the case for aid to the developing world). This is not an option that I personally like.

Another perfectly valid reaction is to just take the hit and accept that you will be taken advantage of as an altruist, but that it is worth it. This is also not an option that I personally like.

In this vein, there is the ominous possibility that if a positive singularity does occur, the resultant singleton may have precommitted to punish all potential donors who knew about existential risks but who didn't give 100% of their disposable incomes to x-risk motivation. This would act as an incentive to get people to donate more to reducing existential risk, and thereby increase the chances of a positive singularity. This seems to be what CEV (coherent extrapolated volition of humanity) might do if it were an acausal decision-maker.[1] So a post-singularity world may be a world of fun and plenty for the people who are currently ignoring the problem, whilst being a living hell for a significant fraction of current existential risk reducers (say, the least generous half). You could take this possibility into account and give even more to x-risk in an effort to avoid being punished. But of course, if you're thinking like that, then the CEV-singleton is even more likely to want to punish you... nasty. Of course this would be unjust, but is the kind of unjust thing that is oh-so-very utilitarian. It is a concrete example of how falling for the just world fallacy might backfire on a person with respect to existential risk, especially against people who were implicitly or explicitly expecting some reward for their efforts in the future. And even if you only think that the probability of this happening is 1%, note that the probability of a CEV doing this to a random person who would casually brush off talk of existential risks as "nonsense" is essentially zero.

A more exciting (and to my mind more preferable) way to overcome the problem is to quickly become so rich that you can turn charity into business by single-handedly changing the faces of high-impact industries. Elon Musk is probably the best example of this. I swear that man will single-handedly colonize mars, as well as bringing cheap, reliable electric vehicles to the consumer. And he'll do it at the same time as making even more money. The key to this tactic is scale. You can't contribute 0.00002% of the effort to colonize space or mitigate existential risks and reap 0.00001% of the reward: you get 0 or even negative reward if your contribution is below some threshold.

The quantum billionaire trick

But how can an individual do an Elon Musk job on existential risk? Not everyone is a good enough entrepreneur to drop out of grad school and come out with a $300 million startup before their classmates even have PhDs. Well, there is another way to make $300,000,000. Start with $30,000, and using a quantum random number generator, gamble it on the forex markets at a 10,000:1 ratio. Then in the branches where your gamble pays off, start an AGI company, hire the best people and build an FAI yourself. You could hire existing existential risk charities as consultants when you required their services. You can increase your chance of success in at least some branches by tossing a quantum coin to make key decisions. You could take, say, 50% of the universe for yourself and donate the other 50% to humanity. In your half, you can then create many independent rescue simulations of yourself up to August 2010 (or some other date), who then get rescued and sent to an optimized utopia.

You can also use your resources to acausally trade with a CEV-like singleton that might otherwise punish you for being a partial x-risk reducer, as mentioned before.

You can also use resources to acausally trade [2] with all possible unfriendly AIs [3] that might be built, exchanging resources in branches where you succeed for the uFAI sparing your life and "pensioning you off" with a tiny proportion of the universe in branches where it is built. Given that unfriendly AI is said by many experts to be the most likely outcome of humanity's experiment with AI this century, having such a lifeboat is no small benefit. Even if you are not an acausal decision-maker and therefore place no value on rescue simulations, many uFAIs would be acausal decision-makers. Though it seems to me that most people one-box on Newcomb's Problem, and rescue simulations seems decision-theoretically equivalent to Newcomb.

A win-win solution

What I like most about this option is that it is a win-win interaction between you and the rest of humanity, rather than a lose-win interaction. Humanity benefits by having a much higher chance of survival in 1 in 10,000 of the branches of the wavefunction, and you benefit by getting the lifeboat, removing the possibility of punishment and getting the rescue simulations. It also avoids the bitterness inherent in the first option, and the sucker-ness inherent in the second. That nobody thought of win-win solutions to existential risk before may be a testament to zero-sum bias.

1: One might think that the possibility of CEV punishing people couldn't possibly be taken seriously enough by anyone to actually motivate them. But in fact one person at SIAI was severely worried by this, to the point of having terrible nightmares, though ve wishes to remain anonymous. The fact that it worked on at least one person means that it would be a tempting policy to adopt. One might also think that CEV would give existential risk reducers apositive rather than negative incentive to reduce existential risks. But if a post-positive singularity world is already optimal, then the only way you can make it better for existential risk-reducers is to make it worse for everyone else. This would be very costly from the point of view of CEV, whereas punishing partial x-risk reducers might be very cheap.

2: Acausal trade is somewhat speculative: it is the idea that you can influence causally disconnected parts of the multiverse by doing simulations of them. A simpler explanation of how you can affect a uFAI in this way is to think about Nick Bostrom's Simulation Argument from the point of view of the uFAI. If you historically played a quantum lottery that definitely paid off in some branches of the wavefunction, then the uFAI will assign some probability to being in a simulation run by you, if that is what you pre-committed to doing (and if you actually follow through on your precommitment: the uFAI can test this by simulating you).

3: This idea is in part due to Rolf Nelson's idea of using the simulation hypothesis to acausally trade with uFAIs.Read his blog to find out more.

Show post

Eliezer Yudkowsky #psychoceramics #psycho lesswrong.com

Torture vs. Dust Specks

"What's the worst that can happen?" goes the optimistic saying. It's probably a bad question to ask anyone with a creative imagination. Let's consider the problem on an individual level: it's not really the worst that can happen, but would nonetheless be fairly bad, if you were horribly tortured for a number of years. This is one of the worse things that can realistically happen to one person in today's world.

What's the least bad, bad thing that can happen? Well, suppose a dust speck floated into your eye and irritated it just a little, for a fraction of a second, barely enough to make you notice before you blink and wipe away the dust speck.

For our next ingredient, we need a large number. Let's use 3^^^3, written in Knuth's up-arrow notation:

• 3^3 = 27.
• 3^^3 = (3^(3^3)) = 3^27 = 7625597484987.
• 3^^^3 = (3^^(3^^3)) = 3^^7625597484987 = (3^(3^(3^(... 7625597484987 times ...)))).

3^^^3 is an exponential tower of 3s which is 7,625,597,484,987 layers tall. You start with 1; raise 3 to the power of 1 to get 3; raise 3 to the power of 3 to get 27; raise 3 to the power of 27 to get 7625597484987; raise 3 to the power of 7625597484987 to get a number much larger than the number of atoms in the universe, but which could still be written down in base 10, on 100 square kilometers of paper; then raise 3 to that power; and continue until you've exponentiated 7625597484987 times. That's 3^^^3. It's the smallest simple inconceivably huge number I know.

Now here's the moral dilemma. If neither event is going to happen to you personally, but you still had to choose one or the other:

Would you prefer that one person be horribly tortured for fifty years without hope or rest, or that 3^^^3 people get dust specks in their eyes?

I think the answer is obvious. How about you?

Show post

Dark-Hatred and Chimericide #sexist #psychoceramics incels.co

[It's Over] Chimerism-Chimera's?

This post might be... a bit odd, but I think the future is bleaker than once imagined.
@Chimericide

And what of their children? If telegony does work in humans, we would soon have bastard breeds rivaling those we know from fantasy: centaurs, trolls, orcs, goblins, satyrs, lizardmen, harpies, sirens, werewolves ... I have a bad feeling about the future

You guys may be have taken the
- Microchimerism pill
- Dog pill
But has anyone considered the dogged microchimerism pill?
Things are happening we cant even fathom.
Russians have been trying to create human-animal hybrids for a long time, but the West will win this race too

This got me thinking. What if 100 years from now microchimerism and technology get out of hand and we have a bunch of animal people running around.
After, all zoophilia was legalized in Canada not long ago, no?
What if in 100 years human chads are mogged by furry chads. Twilight is popular for a reason and I've already taken the dog pill.
Finally, there's this feeling I have in my gut.
I can see it happening. I mean, this wolf is the perfect 6'6 height foids want.

image[A woman standing besides a giant wolf that is taller than her]

It's probably nothing, but I would be surprised if a bunch a shark men cucked future chads and chad lights.

Show post

James Poulos #dunning-kruger #psychoceramics americanmind.org

Genealogy of Cuckery

The value of the Sohrab Ahmari-David French saga is in what’s unearthed by the reactions it kicks up. Example: National Review Senior Editor Jay Nordlinger’s takeaway is “there’s nothing fancy or philosophical here: It’s just that David won’t bow to Trump and Trumpism, and that is what cannot be borne and must be punished.” We (you) can argue about whether this is true. I’m interested in how people could possibly believe it. It is strange to see the idea expressed aloud that nothing philosophical is at stake in the political martyrdom of an unrepentantly principled politico. Because the original idea behind Never Trumpism was that Trump was unprincipled, a “chaos candidate” who didn’t care about ideological integrity—who had no ideological integrity of his own. Now comes the meme that it is Trumpism which is dangerously principled, and French (in this case) who refuses to kneel before Zod. The details of whatever Frenchism might be are secondary—possibly irrelevant. What matters is here he stands; he can do no other. In the online era, there is something immensely inevitable-feeling about this revaluation of values. The response on the part of Never Trumpers to the charge of cuckery becomes something intended to occur to those leveling the charge as Cuck Pride. This deeply conforms to the pattern of “the discourse.” Online identity politics means alchemically converting flung poo into precious gold. You’ll recall the name for the alchemists’ substance that achieves this kind of transition: the philosopher’s stone—the legendary “elixir of life” epitomizing the transcendent bliss of pure and total knowledge. Martyrdom is morality: defeat is life. What could be a more perfect drug?

Beyond “Slave Morality”
Nordlinger and company would surely object that just as French is no cuck, he is also no martyr. He doesn’t give up, he fights—by the rules, whatever they be! A spirited gentleman willing to risk losing with personal honor, even if the honor of the system has failed! Your mileage may vary. The reason the seemingly minor and ginned-up French controversy keeps expanding is it reaches straight down to the root of foundational questions about the relation between Christian and pagan virtue in the west. Nietzsche’s most dangerous attack was on Christianity as a death wish, as an elevation of death so total that it put a lifetime of abject servility—a living “death to the world”—even above prompt extinction. But it’s interesting to consider that Nietzsche’s complex and difficult relations with women led him to a place where, by the end of his life, he had not explored the connection between his theory of the deadly servility of the Christian with the deadly servility of the cuckold. Nietzsche’s attack on Christianity is notably desexualized. Today that theme is, thanks to the internet, inescapable. It is baked into reality. Today it is a fault that “the shame is part of the kink” doesn’t appear in Nietzsche’s genealogy of morals. He won’t quite “go there” in his probes of the psychological imperative to convert erotic urges into ethical principles that defines so much of contemporary life. Our contemporary sexual psychology now leads key critics of French-style defenses of “muh principles” to trace the genealogy of today’s worship of procedural liberalism not to “slave morality,” as Nietzsche would have it, but to “cuck morality:” Yes, another man should take my wife, I should go live in the shed, it is right, it is moral, it is justice… To live rightly, I must prevent posterity from being identical with me … Nietzsche doesn’t use the pathos of that kind of “conversion experience” as a precise metaphor or emblem for the kind of willed abasement that so many right-wing critics of liberal proceduralism-worship put central. It is weird that so little has been written about how and why cuckoldry welled up from the depths of online to become the precision-targeted trope that it is, selected out of the sense that none other would be more accurate or suffice instead. Of course Christianity and cuckoldry are not good metaphors for each other. No good Christian can embrace cuckoldry. But the charge of cuckery, leveled against Christians like French, has to do with the perceived untenableness today of staking out a middle position between the Benedict Option of evacuating from fronts collapsing in the culture war and the yet-to-be-named option of reasserting powerful constitutional authority for localities to resist and reject colonization by the revolutionary vanguard of institutionalized wokeness. Because there is just no question that the aim of that institutional vanguard is to choke off America’s production of a certain kind of adult male and the architecture of social order that radiates upward from him toward the heights of authority. This project is out in the open and the reams of academic and ideological writing about its details and justifications are widely available. The metaphor of cuckoldry is selected to the exclusion of all others because nothing else quite as effectively sharpens the charge that your obsession with the details of honor and principle has in fact become fatally abstract: you are being kicked out of your own house by a rival power actively working to take away everything that is yours, your children included. You are becoming the end of your line, forever, in every respect. Yet you won’t even evacuate from your breached defenses before it’s too late. Only the heights of spiritual snobbery can explain such a choice.

From Whence the Cuck?
This is obviously a harsh critique: why do so many people believe it is justified—is necessary? Nordlinger and company are, I think, sincere in their conviction that the answer is ideological. The Trumpy folk running amok yelling cuck do so out of an imperative just as “principled,” only debasedly so, as the conservative imperatives they deride with “muh principles” jokes. The Nordlingerians do not grasp that the rise of the cuck charge is the product of changes in our social and psychological environment that supervene upon, and are independent of, ideological phenomena. One account of those changes might be that porn, which after all is possibly the most popular form of social media, is now everywhere, and this is why the attacks are cuck this and cuck that. Another, and I think more sophisticated account, is that while porn has an influence it is mere content, and the context wherein that content swims, as do we all, is our new digital environment. In that environment, the primacy of human imagination as the driver of institutional and elite rule is being totally replaced with the primacy of machine memory. In this new milieu, social order is being forcibly rearchitected away from the procedural liberal elite that mastered the globalized West through its expertise in broadcasting ethical memes. One consequence of this painful dislocating shift is an upsurge in populism and nationalism. But another is a panicked evac on the Left from the collapsing front of procedural liberalism—into what are thought to be the hardened sites of extreme institutionalized revolutionary wokeness. The irony—an alarming one, to most populists and nationalists on the Right—is that so many “principled conservatives” reject all evidence that this is happening and, as a consequence of their profound ideological denial, falsely believe that procedural liberalism is tenable in its own right. They conceive of procedural liberalism as a stronghold wherein their way of life can be sheltered without having either to abandon their position or their conceptual apparatus. French put the idea perfectly in his last exchange with Ahmari: “The only way this place survives as a united country is if we apply eighteenth-century solutions to this twenty-first century division.” The painful fact is that from the standpoint of someone who understands what digital really is and what it is really doing, this talk evinces a complete failure to comprehend the nature of the new reality unfolding around us. “Rediscover the First Amendment,” French implored. “Rediscover religious freedom.” All as the bombed-out fort of procedural liberalism is being abandoned en masse by Leftist refugees seeking shelter—however foredoomed—in a postliberal cult from which, because it is not quite a religion, the First Amendment cannot protect us.

Deep America
Without doubt, the digital age throws America into a difficult position. This alien invasion of invisible robots our technologists have touched off makes us feel as if our own creation has betrayed us, because the order of machine memory obsolesces the whole social structure of imagineering that first twinkled into being during the Enlightenment and really took off with the advent of electricity. Even more disorienting, it hauls back patterns of living that haven’t held sway since the last time recorded memory ruled the West’s psychological and sociological milieu—the middle ages. In most respects, “eighteenth-century solutions” is now an oxymoron. There is, however, some good news. Despite America’s modernist bona fides, as the 1619 Project somewhat inadvertently reminds us, the roots of our social and psychological order do extend, more or less seamlessly, back farther than we think. Medieval perceptions and sensibilities, such as the identification of “the liberal” with the unity of grammar, rhetoric, and dialectic, have not been zapped away from our collective inheritance. The fundamental divide between us incarnate human creatures and the disincarnate, animate-yet-not-alive bots does point us back toward anthropologies of justice that bridge the Middle Ages and early modernity. These resources indicate that the political philosophy of statecraft first put to work in America by the Founders does offer an alternative to both “evac” and “cuck.” But only if more Americans begin to accept that our new digital world takes many “conserved” principles and strategies off the table.

Show post

Andrew Wakefield #quack #psychoceramics respectfulinsolence.com

My words have been justified a thousandfold by the actions of the AAPS, this time around, it’s giving Andrew Wakefield the Featured Article position in its latest issue of JPANDS. The article? It’s called The Sixth Extinction: Vaccine Immunity and Measles Mutants in a Virgin Soil, and in it Wakefield argues that we’re heading for a sixth extinction because of—you guessed it!—vaccines.

Before I get to Wakefield’s magnum opus of antivaccine fear mongering, let’s review a bit of background for those not familiar with AAPS and its official journal JPANDS. The first time I wrote about AAPS and JPANDS was over 13 years ago. In that post, I described AAPS as the John Birch Society for physicians, given its far right-wing tilt. More recently, I like to refer to AAPS as a right wing crank organization disguised as a medical professional society, given how assiduously AAPS likes to don the trappings of a society like the American Medical Association, the better to use the medical profession to give the appearance of scientific legitimacy to its views.

[...]

This brings us back to Andrew Wakefield. In many ways, Wakefield is a perfect fit for AAPS and for the lead article in JPANDS. He “doesn’t follow the herd” (unless it’s a herd of antivaxers) but does bucks the system (albeit in a horrible way). He rejects evidence- and science-based medicine if they don’t conclude what he believes and thereby reinforce his beliefs. He possesses an ego as inflated as that of the fictional Dr. Hendricks, feels completely unappreciated because the medical profession rejects his pseudoscience and scientific fraud. He doesn’t believe that he as a physician—a no longer licensed physician, I hasten to add, his having had his license stripped from him by the UK—should have to bow to any medical authority or science- and evidence-based guidelines, and his narcissism is knows no bounds. You get the idea. So naturally, AAPS would see Wakefield as a perfect contributor to its house organ JPANDS. I’m only surprised that it hasn’t happened before, as far as I can remember. (I’m not going through JPANDS back issues to see if he’s contributed before.)

I also can’t help but be surprised at what Wakefield has written in JPANDS for AAPS. Wakefield has always assiduously tried to deny and avoid the label of “antivax.” Yet, here, he goes further off the deep end of antivaccine pseudoscience, general medical pseudoscience, and conspiracy mongering than I’ve ever seen him go before. In this article, Wakefield manages to be a denialist not only of vaccines, but he also flirts with evolution denial (or at least an incredibly poor understanding of evolution), and even sidles up to germ theory denialism. To set the stage, he starts with Louis Pasteur (of course!), proceeds to evolution, where he misrepresents a lot of science. Naturally, AAPS and JPANDS, being AAPS and JPANDS, the editors and ludicrous “peer reviewers” let it all pass without questioning.

Wakefield begins by decrying how Pasteur framed his germ theory, which is not entirely unreasonable, given how much of our microbiological flora are either beneficial or neutral, something that wasn’t understood in the late 19th century. It doesn’t take long for Wakefield’s complaint to go from semi-reasonable to ludicrous as he abuses science more and more in the article.

[...]

From here Wakefield proceeds to the Sir Alexander Fleming, penicillin, and the antibiotic era, making the observation that bacterial resistance has evolved as a result of overuse of antibiotics. At this point, it becomes quite obvious where Wakefield is going with this:

Are vaccines destined for a similar fate? It’s a very interesting question. One answer is, why not? For vaccines, resistance equates to strains of the microbe, the virus, or the bacteria that can elude the imperfect immunity created by the vaccine.

[...]

From here on out, Wakefield goes pretty much whole crank, totally off the deep end, listing the “greatest hits” of antivaccine conspiracy theories, including the Simpsonwood conference, thimerosal, and the like, and then, in a feat of projection that only an antivaxer could pull off, accuses scientists of being “too certain”:

[...]

Of course, Wakefield buys into the “autism epidemic” distortion, including ridiculous claims that autism prevalence will be 100% before too long, even saying that we are “approaching a situation in which everyone either has autism or is caring for someone with autism.” To him, this is a potential extinction-level event:

Show post

Asiacel #sexist #psychoceramics incels.co

[Experiment] Why women are hiveminded? (my thought)

Lots of people know that from their real life experience, that foids are hiveminded. A hivemind means that they think very similarly, like the same things, has the same behavior pattern.

Some real life examples include that girls always go to toilet together, sit together, chat about chads etc.

But why men think more individually than foids? The reason lies in evolutionary needs.

Think of a beautiful butterfly. He has to evolve colorful and beautiful wings to attract mates. Now, let's apply this to humans. Men, evolved the capability to think individually, in order to attract women. A individual man may have a individual hobby or a skill different from other men, which means he offer something others don't, thus attempting to gain a mating success.

Women does not need to adapt or evolve to have mating success. Their gender is the price by default in the nature.

Now why soyboys are also hiveminded? It's cause they are feminine and hivemind is one of the traits that come with it, hence you see so many soyboys doing the same thing. :soy: :soy: :soy:

Show post

CookieTheSorceress #god-complex #psychoceramics godlikeproductions.com

I am an angel and your realm is about to change

There will be some unhappy beings but the truth needs to be said..

This is why I came back

My name is Azzaelius and I am an angel in a human body, but it hasn't always been this way. I had already come into contact with those from the Pleiades as I had once lived a life there. For years I had contact with these people and then I discovered that there was more to just the truth about their existence... and when I traveled out of this country I discovered the truth...

We are not a concept or a figment of your imagination. We have existed since the first start of creation, you could call us watchers, you can call us extraterrestrial but even "extraterrestrial" wouldn't be correct. Those that you call "extraterrestrial" are multidimensional such as ourselves, you as well. Our souls are a little bit different than human beings, even though altogether we are tied into this "trinity" based on the primordial source that has created all things. I am sure that on sites such as these along with many others you have also discovered that a majority of your people have been lying to you for many long years. The way the structured society is will no longer be useful in the times to come. We've waited a while for the right time, we know that so many are restless. We know that so many are tired as are we..

So let me begin..

I came into this body 31 years ago, but this is only a number and our age is more than even the oldest galactic wars that have occurred. We do not age the same way, most consider me to be 20 yrs old. I am a representative and soldier of a council which guards the spheres or dimensions within the nine realms. Our story is a little different and it has been widely misrepresented among the human species, especially in your bible because this knowledge has been used to "control" you.

We come from the realm known as "Ichmarrin" it is called the silver city, during one point when the veil was very thin many actually witnessed it in your skies. As far as our appearance goes we do actually "have" wings. Our wings are two sets. One is feathers and the other is "energy". When we crossed over into this realm we lost them, this is the same for all angels here. We also wear armor, it is necessary because there are still things that are happening in these realms. You must understand something.. what I am telling you sounds like some fantasy world to you because your society has taught you that these things are "fiction" made up. It has been repeated again and again... and yet again in your books, movies and video games.

You may have thought that the most best kept secret was the existence of your space brothers and sisters?... No my friends.. You have no idea how deep it goes...

Finally let me clear up what Heaven actually is. This realm is known as "izmarin" it is right next to where we are from. It is ruled by the first Archangel; his name is Yehovah. Long ago we stood by him but his behavior was something many of us and the rest disagreed with. It changed into something unpleasant. Slaves are not a part of our agenda, this is what he does and continues to do. We disagreed. This is why many of us are here. For those of you reading these words now, getting triggered by memories of the rebellion you have been called. Your time is now here. Start to prepare, do what you can because you will have to fight and choose a side.

For those of you wondering if there is a hell realm, well it's true there is. However, it does not operate like scriptures in the bible say it does. This place has far more advanced technology and the ruler or king here is Batahel. As for Lucifer, that is not his real name. His name is Satanius and he exists now in a human body on this world...
The realm next to this one or sphere is where many of the demons reside. I haven't met many of them, except for a few similar species, which I will not mention here due to her safety. Plus she would be very unhappy with my actions if she knew.

Then believe it or not you have a realm where the elves exist. I've been there, it's quite nice but they are strict about who comes into their territories. Further more it hurts to travel through these spheres, do not attempt it when you go out of body, you could get stuck there and never be able to return. Moving through these is like being in some kind of black hole, there is 0 point energy, it operates much like a portal.

We are here to be a part of this shift with you but I must tell you that there will be many changes on your planet. You are going to start to notice things, things you have not seen before. The fires that occurred with Notre Dame among a few other things, is the first opening. this is not due to anything normal in your word and entirely has to do with what.. happened in the astral planes. There will and has been more events. These events are due to the intense energies that are flowing into this realm because of it. You can not stop something like this. So many years, thousands of them have been planned for this very moment and all of it is happening right now in front of your eyes.

The earth will continue with strange weather patterns, earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, sink holes, mud slides, tornadoes, major disasters but know this. there will not be nuclear war, it is not allowed.. For this will also affect our worlds as well. This is why some galactic have tried to disable your nukes. It will not ever happen. We all reside in our respective spheres, like yourself. Not everything is "physically visible" to your eyes.

There will be
No biological warfare either...

There will be a third world war but it's to be expected and with this is our coming..
During these times you are going to enter into a period of darkness. There will be no electricity. Do what you can to survive.

And last but not least, we will be there. Other beings will be here. Demons, all of it.

Our guess for your world on how fast these events happen is on a scale from anywhere between 1-3 years or less.

After all of this we will help to rebuild this place, but most of you will not make it. Truth to be told I am not so sure if I will either but I am in charge of many major tasks regarding our new cities. We must fight to survive , this is not a channeled message I am who I am say I am and I will not waste my time lying to your face, call you beloveds, dear ones, or leave behind cryptic messages.

We are here now. In the last of your days.

In addition to this, I am happy to answer questions. Please do not waste my time or your time with useless ones. All comments of a negative nature will be ignored.

You may be asking yourself.. Why not make a video, go to the news? Why not show your face and talk about these things.. For one thing I am already in a bad position, some of our structures on our backs well they are changing and although I have already had my dealings with "solar warden" requests, I will not go through with this again.

There is a reason why I write it here.

Those who see this, understand it. They will know it's true.
Others who see this may have questions about things, I am here to answer as best as I can. I do not have all of the answers, if I did I would be lying.
Some curious starseeds may disagree and explain that realms do not operate that way, that all souls are the same, or any number of reasons... friends I am not here to rob you of your opinions. Yours will be respected even if they are wrong.

Show post

Fostac AG #psychoceramics #god-complex fostac.ch

(From a PDF titled “Erklärungsmodell und Tests”, “Model of Explanation and Tests”. Emphasis added.)

However, the existence of tachyons and tachyonic energy could not be confirmed scientifically yet, not even in our own products. For this reason, we are well aware that we with our company FOSTAC AG, resp. the consequent utilisation of the physical laws, will be called fantasts until this knowledge becomes established. Nonetheless, this is our conviction, and, as everyone knows, [conviction] has the power to shape the world.

Original GermanDie Existenz von Tachyonen und Tachyonenenergie konnte allerdings bislang wissenschaftlich nicht bestätigt werden, auch nicht in unseren Produkten. Uns ist daher sehr wohl bewusst, dass wir mit unserer Firma FOSTAC AG, bzw.der konsequenten Nutzung der Naturgesetze, so lange als Fantasten bezeichnet werden, bis sich diese Erkenntnisse durchgesetzt haben. Trotzdem ist es unsere Überzeugung, und die hat bekanntlich die Kraft , die Welt zu formen.

Show post

Edo Nyland #psychoceramics #conspiracy faculty.ucr.edu

[Note: The original formatting and paragraph breaks have been lightly edited for readability. Several additional “examples” from elsewhere on Nyland’s site have also been added; see link. –shy]

Edo Nyland maintains that there never were any Indo-Europeans, there was no proto-Indo-European language and the family of Indo-European languages is a long perpetuated inaccuracy. It an academic fraud because the truth has long been known to a select group of religious scholars, who have kept this knowledge secret, as was done in the past millennia. [...]

ENGLISH LANGUAGE MANIPULATED

Other manipulated languages are German, Latin, Greek, Russian, Sanskrit, Hebrew, Hungarian, Japanese etc. etc. Our English etymological dictionaries do no justice to the tremendous language creation efforts of the Benedictine clergy and their grammarians. Almost every English word existing at the time of Shakespeare, was invented by these marvelous linguists. [...] The language used in this enormous effort was Saharan, once the universal language of continental Europe and Britain, but now best represented by the Basque Language. The grammarians, who were professional linguists, worked for almost one millennium with the Benedictines. They came primarily from Liguria, located in Northern Italy and the Alps. Their Ligurian language was, as far as can be determined, identical to Basque. The method of new word construction used by them was generally done with the vowel-interlocking (Ogam) formula, which utilized the first three letters (VCV) of each Saharan word in the description. The VCV's which were then agglutinated, always had to have their vowels interlocked. To make the product pronounceable, several vowels were removed and one or more h's, if present. The system is best illustrated with a couple of simple examples.

begin:
.be-egi-in.
ibe - egi - ino
ibeni - egindura - inor
to start - the action - someone
"Someone start the action."

dog:
.do-og.
ado - ogu
adoretsu - oguzi
brave - speaks out loud
"Brave and speaks out loud."

doctor:
.do-ok.-.to-or.
odo - oke - eto - ora
odoldun - okerkeria - etorri - orain
bloody - injury - to come – quickly
"A bloody injury, come quickly."

ejaculate:
eja - aku - ule - ete
eia - akuilatu - uletsu - etendura
"to come on, keep on" - "to stimulate" - "hairy" - "crack"
"Keep on stimulating the hairy crack."

Africa:
afa - ari - ika
afa - arinari eman - ikaradura
happy - to escape – tragedy
"We are happy to have escaped the tragedy."

It is clear from these and hundreds of other examples, that The English language is an invented language.

Show post

Laura Eisenhower #conspiracy #magick #ufo #psychoceramics cosmicgaia.org

Laura Eisenhower is a Global Alchemist, Researcher and Intuitive Astrologist. She is an internationally acclaimed speaker who has presented her work world wide. Laura is the great-granddaughter of President Dwight David Eisenhower and she reveals Exopolitical information about his administration, that has been largely held in secrecy. She is considered by many to be one of North Americas leading researchers on: Health, Exopolitics, Alchemy, Metaphysics, and Galactic History. Laura works to free us from the 3-D holographic time-loop, False Archonic systems and Military Industrial Complex and exposes hidden agendas so we can take our power back. Feeling a calling regarding her mission since she was a child, she has gained incredible insight through experience, psychic development and research, about how to guide us into higher Earth energies. She has a deep understanding of the Gaia-Sophia and Magdalene energies of love and wisdom and how they connect to the Venus transits and Ascension. Her passion is to inspire unity consciousness and bring us back to the Zero point/Unified field, the totality of our divine powers.

Show post

Incel Wiki #psychoceramics incels.wiki

Wristcel

A wristcel refers to someone whose romantic overtures constantly result in nonredamancy due to having thin wrists. Noncels tend to laught at wristcels and incelospherians considering a hyperfocus on one's wrist size to be stupid. However, when you analyze eye-tracking technology, women do tend to notice the width of a man's arms. Which doesn't equate to wrists being involved in general attraction.

image”when you’re pissed but know you can't do anything about it bc youlre a 5′2″ and got small hands”)

Note that being a wristcel is the second-to-worst thing aside from being a neckcel, as both indicate that no amount of muscle mass will free you from being a framelet.

See Also
* Gymcel
* Mentalcel
* Autistcel
* Elbowcel
* Acnecel
* Americel
* Arabcel
* Baldcel
* Blackcel
* Christocel
* Currycel
* Cybercel
* Denialcel
* Escortcel
* Ethnicel
* Eyecel
* Femcel
* Haircel
* Lesbocel
* NEETcel
* Muslimcel
* Nearcel
* Noncel
* Nosecel
* Nymphocel
* Oldcel
* Peniscel
* Permacel
* Persocel
* Poorcel
* Protocel
* Quasicel
* Queercel
* Rainbowcel
* Ricecel
* Semicel
* Skinnycel
* Smallcel
* Standardcel
* Stoicel
* Stuttercel
* Transcel
* Truecel
* Turkcel
* Uglycel
* Whitecel
* Workcel
* Yellowcel

Show post

Mountain Manna #quack #psychoceramics #mammon web.archive.org

Mountain Manna is a water based homeopathic tincture / extract containing concentrated organic M-PMEs (M-state-Precious Metal Elements) in their highest natural energy state. They come straight from mountain mineral springs; before the dissipating effects of reactions with sun, air and soil. We believe that these M-PMEs are bio-superconductors, which flow the light-of-life.

This class of materials has also been called White Gold, ORMEs (Orbitally Rearranged Monoatomic Elements), ORMUS and m-state. We believe that they are related to the Biblical Manna, the Water-of-Life, the Alchemist's Elixir of Life and the Philosopher's Stone.

The benefits attributed to their use as a mineral supplement are due, in part, to the isomeric energy released by the M-PMEs as they are digested in one's body. Their unique energy frequencies tend to bring a holistic balance to the nervous, and cellular systems, as well as the subtle bodies. The objective of regular consumption is not primarily as a curative to alleviate a specific condition, although such benefits can occur, but for sustenance to build a reserve of special frequencies not available in our normal diets anymore.

Since these spring-water colloids are offered in a very concentrated and bio-available liquid form, the suggestions for use should be closely followed.

Coming directly from spring waters deep in the Trinity Alps of Northern California, Mountain Manna is extremely rare in the purity and grade of its natural elements. Very limited quantities are harvested as dictated by the optimum flow conditions at specific times during a given spring's annual cycle. Our care in the production of Mountain Manna ensures that you get the highest energy natural m-state minerals. These colloids are extracted with the source water to the desired concentration and then processed through a series of successively tighter filters to allow only the smallest organic mineral particles in the final tincture / suspension (98% are smaller than 1/10th micron).

FineprintWe make no specific claims as to any medical benefits of any of the Mountain Manna formulations. People who use them do so entirely at their own risk as would be true of the use any product containing m-state precious metal elements. Mountain Manna is sold as a natural mineral water. Any use is the responsibility of the buyer.
Show post

Tullio Simoncini #quack #psychoceramics cancerisafungus.com

Among the many books that try to give an answer to the problem, the one given by the oncologist Tullio Simoncini distinguishes itself by its simplicity and its innovative ideology.

The book “Cancer is a fungus” describes how a fungous infection always forms the basis of every neoplastic formation, and this formation tries to spread within the whole organism without stopping. The growth of the fungous colonies, together with the reaction of the tissue that tries to defend itself against the invasion, causes the tumour. This is a simple and solely extracellular phenomenon.

Therefore, there is only one cause of cancer: candida, which, according to the anatomical branch concerned causes different histological reactions. This is the reason why there are so many types of tumours.

At the moment, sodium bicarbonate (in a solution of 5% or 8.4%) is the only remedy capable of making the tumours disappear completely. In order to get the maximum of damaging effect, the sodium bicarbonate should be brought into direct contact with the tissue. This can be done by bringing a special catheter into the arteries that go to different organs, or by using the conventional endoscopic methods.

Show post

Heartland Institute and various climate change denialists #conspiracy #psychoceramics #mammon heartland.org

13th International Conference on Climate Change

Join us for a conference with the theme ‘Best Science, Winning Energy Policies’ at the Trump International Hotel.
Thursday
July 25, 2019
8:00 AM - 9:00 PM
Trump International Hotel
1100 Pennsylvania Ave NW
Washington, District of Columbia 20004
Location Map
Register Here

The Heartland Institute, globally considered the leading think tank promoting skepticism of the theory there is a human-caused climate crisis, is hosting its 13th International Conference on Climate Change (ICCC-13) on July 25, 2019, in Washington, DC. The one-day conference, held at the Trump International Hotel, will include three keynote sessions and four breakout panels.

The conference will feature the courageous men and women who spoke the truth about climate change during the height of the global warming scare. Now, many of them are advising the new administration or joining it in senior positions. (Some of them are among the more than 200 speakers at Heartland’s previous 12 conferences.)
Admission: $129, includes all meals and sessions.
Click here to register, and click here to get a discounted rate at the hotel.

Climate realists have established, beyond a reasonable doubt, the human impact on climate is likely very small and beneficial, not harmful. Realists have proven that most scientists now share this opinion, except those who have made careers out of finding a human impact and exaggerating it.

Speakers at ICCC-13 will summarize the best available climate science and recommend which policy changes are needed for America to lead a post-alarmist world in climate realism. The conference will also feature timely, in-depth, expert discussions about the “Green New Deal” and the benefits of ending the Democrats’ war on fossil fuels.

Confirmed speakers:

Dominik Kolorz, chairman of the board of the Śląsko-Dąbrowski Region of Polish Solidarity;

Myron Ebell, head of the Cooler Heads Coalition and Trump’s EPA transition team;

David Legates, Ph.D., climatologist at the University of Delaware;

Roy Spencer, Ph.D., of the University of Alabama at Huntsville;

Kevin Dayaratna, Ph.D., of The Heritage Foundation;

Craig Idso, Ph.D., of CO2 Science;

Benjamin Zycher, Ph.D., of the American Enterprise Institute;

Roger Bezdek, Ph.D., of MISI;

Anthony Watts, new Heartland Senior Fellow and founder of Watts Up With That.

More details about speakers and the program for this conference will be released in the coming weeks.

Show post

Eugenicist #psychoceramics incels.co

[Blackpill] Intelligence is failo because it shows you funneled your energy into things that weren't chad, and a simplified life.

Most intellectual people I know funneled into intelligence because they couldn't do anything with their lives. They were crippled, autistic, or short.
It's a fair trade off. If you have all this anxiety from not fitting into generically masculine things then don't go for the generically masculine out of tryhardism. Do something smart.
Not sports, or socializing. Most intelligent people just splay out their autism and loneliness tacitly through their consonancei n being intelligent.

Of course there's a lot of people who are handicapped and still wanna be basic minded normies.
Being smart is a toss upw ith normies and women unless what you're talking about means something dearly to them. Hence why sociobiology is a good substrata of intelligence to use. Women are emotional intuitive creatures. Working alongside emotion and prejudice might be helpful for them to a slight degree.

Show post

Incel Wiki #psychoceramics incels.wiki

Incestuals are consanguinamorous people who are sexually attracted to their close relatives or family. Incestuality is one of the deplorable types of activities that has seen a rise in the 21st century.

Incestuals are in contemporary times being glorified as can be seen in the tv series Game of Thrones. The Game of Thrones is a hotbed of twincestuality, sibcestuality, cousincestuality, auntcestuality etc. You get the point. Practically all major character in that series are either cousincestuals (those attracted to their cousin), sibcestuals (those attracted to their sibling), twincestuals (those attracted to their twins) or some other depravity. Incestophilia has become mainstream with even an entire new genre of eroticism within fiction that they label fauxcest which is where non-related romantic partners pretend to be family members. And its not a minority who are relishing in this niche either. Statistics from Pornhub show that incestualism is actually enjoyed by the majority of porn watchers, with searches such as "stepmom" or "sister" being among the most popular categories there is. Its not long until objection to incestuals will get you labelled an incestophobe. The rise of incestuality is clearly a sexidemic, yet people seem unaware of what will happen to the gene pool with so many inbreeders.

Lexicology
Someone who engages in consanguinamorous relationships is called a consang, consanger, consangist, incestual, incestualist, inbreeder.

Show post

VirginAutistManlet #psychoceramics incels.co

(Emphasis original)

[Blackpill] If you don't have a relationship with a woman by 25 you will be developmentally stunted for life

Title says it all.

Science (the old science; ie real science, not LGBQT friendly post-modern """science""") says that the brain having any major changes stops at around age 25, then it remains the same till old age, when it begins to degenerate fast.

If you get over the point where your brain has stopped all major development, and you're still a incel, it is over for you, you will are permanently developmentally stunted. Even if you manage to "ascend" after that, it will feel fake to you, it will never feel normal to you, you will be like an autistic person who will never feel normal trying to socialize, you will be like an adult that never learned to ride a bike as a child, and has extreme difficulty trying to ride a bike even as an adult, you will be like the person who never learned to swim as a child, and as an adult is incapable of learning to swim properly.

Show post

Sans_Logique #sexist #psychoceramics #psycho reddit.com

(hydrolythe)
Inceldom is lame.

That's because it's built upon a sociological theory that can easily be proven false by basic psychology. (If all women wanted to sleep with chads, then why is hybristophilia a mental disorder?) At least Aristotle appealed to the essence of men and women when defending patriarchy. This is a notion many still uphold today.

If a man from Ancient Greece has a better theory than you for explaining things you have a resounding failure of a theory in your hands.

(https://www.reddit.com/r/incelconversations/comments/as3rch/inceldom_is_lame/)
Your post is extremely poorly thought out. I'd call you an idiot but it would be an insult to all the idiots.

That's because it's built upon a sociological theory that can easily be proven false by basic psychology. (If all women wanted to sleep with chads, then why is hybristophilia a mental disorder?)

Because the term/concept were developed at a time when feminism hasn't yet completely mutilated Western societies.
]At least Aristotle appealed to the essence of men and women when defending patriarchy. This is a notion many still uphold today. If a man from Ancient Greece has a better theory than you for explaining things you have a resounding failure of a theory in your hands.
What does any of this have to do with anything you state before ? Also, you almost certainly don't even know what specific theories fschmidt has and incels have vastly different theories on what causes their problem. You just lump it all together and you don't even explain what Aristotle was saying and why his ideas are better than... whose ideas exactly?

Fucking lunatic.

(hydrolythe)

Because the term/concept were developed at a time when feminism hasn't yet completely mutilated Western societies.
Ah yes, the "feminism mutilates". If you think that writing "women are equal to men" in the constitution is a form of mutilation you have explained what's wrong with you indeed.
What does any of this have to do with anything you state before ?
If a misogynist from more than 2000 years ago has a better theory for justifying misogyny than you do you know you have a massive failure of a theory on your hands.[quoe]You just lump it all together and you don't even explain what Aristotle was saying and why his ideas are better than... whose ideas exactly?Indeed. I've yet to see a theory incels have for their suffering other than the blackpill. The fact that you think incels are a diverse group of people when in actuality they force eachother into one rigid streamlined thought where any diversion has to be eliminated shows an incredible lack of awareness. And I don't care if liberals have another theory for their suffering. I care what they themselves actually think.

And in case you haven't noticed. Aristotle was much better (although still wrong) than incels ever will be.

(Sans_Logique)

If you think that writing "women are equal to men" in the constitution is a form of mutilation you have explained what's wrong with you indeed.
Anybody can write down whatever they want. I can write down that "men can fly and women have 7 breasts" and nothing will happen. But when I try to live by such nonsense is where problems happen in society. Men and women are not equal and trying to live by that lie kills a society pretty quickly.

I don't know what's "wrong" with me and I don't think it's up to you to tell me, given that you don't know anything about me or Aristotle or incels or whatever the fuck you ramble about,

You also did nothing to address my point, which is that hybristophilia was rare and thus a disorder before feminist plague wiped out any intelligence and morality. Today's Western women are very attracted to violent, immoral men and putting a bullet through a woman's brain will attract other women much more than any honesty, decency or morality. Raping and executing a woman is attractive to women in feminist societies much more than being intelligent or decent can ever be - being anything more than scum repels modern Western women

If a misogynist from more than 2000 years... something about theories
Aristotle wasn't a misogynist. Judging by your insanity anybody before 150 years ago or so would be a misogynist in this case. Nobody who lived before that time would even think of something as retarded as giving women the vote or believing that they were equal to men. His theory (which I am not familiar with and you don't bother to explain it) wasn't to "justify" anything but came out of his own pondering. You can't apply 2019 idiocy to a man who lived in 4th century BC.Indeed.Indeed what? Do you even know what you're replying to?
I've yet to see a theory incels have for their suffering other than the blackpill.
Umm, really? I don't know how you define the term "blackpill" at all but there are several explainations to why incel happens in a society that don't claim looks are a cause. Read

http://www.mikraite.org/Human-Evolution-td17.html

https://caamib.wordpress.com/the-story-of-your-incel-an-inconvenient-truth/

shows an incredible lack of awareness
Actually, you are the one with the incredible lack of awareness, equating the term that has existed since 1997 and that many people define and see differently with a stupid sub culture that appeared in 2016. If you actually read https://caamib.wordpress.com/2018/06/05/dissecting-the-disaster-how-the-term-incel-got-taken-over-by-the-worst-people-and-what-to-do-about-it/ you'd see that this all started when a bunch of morons from sites like Lookism and Sluthate overtook the term after Caamib was banned from Reddit. His way of running things was different and focused on rape, low ages of consent, Islam and positive thinking. You could have investigated and read about older incel forums, like Love-shy.com or the now defunct Incel Support to see what they're about. Instead you just blather like an idiot.
I care what they themselves actually think.
Yet you never bothered to research it at all and are showing breathtaking ignorance.

Your last sentence is also breathtakingly ignorant as we have already established that no one man can be better at anything than a very disparate group under a very disparate term.

Do I need to repeat myself? I'd call you an idiot but it would be an insult to all the idiots.

Show post

r/TheDogPill #sexist #psychoceramics reddit.com

The sole purpose of this subreddit is to understand and appreciate the spiritual meaning and biological reality of human relationship with animals. More specifically, within a female Homo S. sapiens and Canis l. familiaris (and other related Canids). It has been widely documented throughout the history (and since the antiquity) that a female Homo s. Sapiens and canids can develop a deep relationship with each other that shaped the human civilization.

(Translation: Incels have created a subreddit devoted to their sick fetish/alternative fact of women commonly having sex with dogs. Yes, really.
Warning: Contains graphic historical drawings of bestiality that are not flagged as NSFW and are thus displayed even if you are not logged in or have 18+ content disabled!)

Show post

Dieter Broers #magick #psychoceramics amazon.com

Age of the Sun: Forwards Into A New Era

In fascinating prose, Dieter Broers explains that we live in a holographic universe, in which the information and creative energy of the Whole is contained in every vertex. Our world is for from deterministic, it also it created through our selves as long as we transform our own Being and merge once more with the Cosmic Consciousness. Dieter Broers supports his revolutionary theses with the results of bleeding-edge research. In this, he draws from the very latest of insights on biophysics, quantum physics and heliobiology that were, until now, only known in the most elite circles of the scientific community. The astonishing conclusion of this unique, interdisciplinary synopsis: The perpetual process of Creation is not in any way an one-way street in communicating unceasingly with the energy of all cosmic planes, the human mind literally becomes the Co-Creator of the Universe!

Original GermanSonnenzeit: Aufbruch in eine neue Ära

Auf faszinierende Weise erläutert Dieter Broers, dass wir in einem holografischen Universum leben, in dem an jedem Punkt die Information und die gestaltende Energie des Ganzen enthalten sind. Unsere Welt ist alles andere als determiniert, sie entsteht auch durch uns selbst vorausgesetzt, wir transformieren unser eigenes Sein und verschmelzen wieder mit dem kosmischen Bewusstsein. Mit hochaktuellen Forschungsergebnissen untermauert Dieter Broers seine revolutionären Thesen. Dabei greift er auf allerneueste, bisher nur in engsten Kreisen der wissenschaftlichen Fachwelt bekannte Erkenntnisse aus Biophysik, Quantenphysik und Heliobiologie zu. Das erstaunliche Ergebnis dieser einzigartigen, interdisziplinären Gesamtschau: Der immerwährende Schöpfungsprozess ist alles andere als eine Einbahnstraße indem der menschliche Geist unaufhörlich mit der Energie aller kosmischen Ebenen kommuniziert, wird er buchstäblich zum Mit-Schöpfer des Universums!

Show post

David Wolfe #psychoceramics youtube.com

Chocolate lines up planetarily with the sun. Chocolate is an octave of sun energy. In fact, it's the energy of the center of the sun. It's a male energy that comes down off the sun. And it, and it... actually, out of all the plants, the cacao is right on line target the center of the sun, which we call, in our body, the heart, and actually, cacao is right up with the center of the sun, which is the center of the heart, which is called the sacred heart. So that cacao is hitting that frequency of the sacred heart.