The only thing I know for certain is that if the current elites are against someone, then they must be on the right track, be it Cynthia McKinney or David Duke.

I don't believe for one second that there wasn't a plane that hit the WTC, but there is a thread on here where a video is posted of a silhouette of the plane hitting where the plane looks a ton like Air Force One.

u know what? GOD had to do something with the all 9/11 stuff.. there were just SO much "miracles" happening that day... vanishing planes, never found bodies, more ten 10 ppl calling from 30.000 feet with a successrate of 0,006%
200 gram bandana fresh from the store found at the crashtite while a 100.000.000 gram plane vanished (guess god forgot to miracilously vanish that one), pentagon lawn untouched y the 100 ton plane that crashed into it (guess god tought the lawn was too beutifull, so he restored it)
just thinking about al those "miracles" gives me a warm feeling inside

Do you want to argue against the laws of physics? The WTC fell as if it was falling with almost 0 resistance through the air. The ONLY way this can be accomplished is with CD. There is no other plausible explanation, not even the lame attempt by the BOSS.

It is now interesting to note that the WTC complex stored $160 billion of gold and precious metals. Thats a lot of metal, dump trucks worth of gold. In fact a dump truck full of gold was found by the teams at ground zero. Where on earth did this truck come from? Did someone in all the confusion decide to grab a dump truck and somehow manage to fill it with gold before driving off (to under building 5). Out of the $160 billion of gold and precious metals stored only $430 was recovered. I would speculate that tunnel access was organised for the CD team and dump trucks full of explosives were driven in underground over the weekend. Then after the first tower was hit and certain explosions were set off in the basement these very same dump trucks rolled in via the tunnel access to fill up with gold and drive off under building five to who knows? One dump truck was slow or got held up on the way out and the guys driving it bailed out, upwards away from the huge underground charges timed to blow when the south tower collapsed. Sounds like the plot of a James Bond film but the evidence supports it.

If the FBI releases any video that shows a 757 hitting the pentago, I am moving out of this country.

Here, again, is one example of video fakery that can be verified by anyone - In the documentary 9/11: In Plane Site at 28:00, the plane approaches the south tower at about 1/4 of the speed that we see at 10:23 in the same documentary - HOW CAN THIS BE? The widely-stated approach speed is 530 mph, even though those who know say a 767 CANNOT fly that fast at low altitude. Could we unintentionally be supporting one of the central tenets of the "Official Story" if we accept a high-speed approach? How about if we accept the physics-defying behavior of the plane in the CNN "Butterplane" south tower impact? How can we IGNORE videos of Fox goons spreading the "Official Story" at Ground Zero almost immediately, despite eyewitnesses to the contrary? Why should we take VIDEO FAKERY off the table when we discuss 9/11 here?

The pentagon pics I'm more skeptical about. It could just have easily been recreated in a movie studio somewhere. It would be interesting to get a medical examiner's take on these.

The most accurate characterization of my position is "the plane missed the south tower". I have offered evidence to support it. Is there "evidence" to the contrary? Yes. Could it be bogus? Yes. With total control of the MSM, wouldn't it be cheaper and more reliable to create the fiction that the plane hit the south tower, rather than risk flying a 767-type drone into NYC? I believe so.

[On the theory that world-renowned demolitions experts Controlled Demolitions Inc. were involved in a conspiracy in Oklahomy City in 1995 and on 9/11]

It is of considerable mention that CDI presided over the clean-up of Oklahoma City, and this is important because there is essentially undeniable evidence that there were multiple explosives found in the Murrah building (which I can link you to). So it seems likely to me that if elements of CDI were involved with a cover-up then, they would do the same now. Their expertise in controlled demolitions is not in question, but their credibility on post-explosive analysis or their honesty is as far as I'm concerned.

I think the focus should be on the fact that there is/was NO PLANES at Pentagon and Shanksville.....

I mean there is no cockpit, no tail, no fusalodge, no wings, no lugage, no engines, no seats, no black boxes, no bodies,....nothing zero. When you ask people to FIND THE PLANE it is impossible....because there is/was none... That way when I share with people the WHOLE ATTACK I ask them to find the planes......the burden of proof is on them to Find the planes...... not me.....

No disrpect to WTC 1-2-7.... but there is to many WHAT IF'S....and HOW COME'S.....big "PUZZLE" there, lots of peices, too much thinking......

***** For the record I think remote control planes and massive military grade explosives brought these buildings down........bush&CO.....planned/carried out/covered it up/blamed it on arab "TERRORIST".......********.

Flight 175 wasn't really UA 175 full of passengers and highjacker miracle pilots. I think everybody agrees on this one, right?

Many people question the Pentagon eyewitnesses yet only a few question the photographic evidence from the 2nd tower 'plane strike'. I find this highly illogical.

The perps had to had spent MILLIONS on planting demo charges in 2 towers and WTC7, rigging explosives/plane/missle/whatever for the pentagon, shipped the steel from the towers to China, fake Osama and Zarqawi videos and on and on.....

I think it is foolish to dismiss any theory, no matter how ridiculous it might appear at first sight, without looking into it (after all schoolkids came to their teachers and told them what's going to happen on 9/11, doesn't seem like a ridiculous theory now).

[On 9/11 destruction of WTC]

There was not 1 reason for this, but many.
Starting with the most simple motives - the asbsetos, the insurance, the lack of tennants ( income ), the aging and corrosion problems ( aluminum clad steel ).
To the political - the taliban walking out on the talks on the oil pipeline thru Afghanistan, Sadam talking about converting his economy to the Euro, etc.
To the unimaginable - do a google search on the " Georgia Guidestones " and you will soon realize what I mean. Keep in mind the current global population is ~6.5 Billion. Then think about the timeline of the erection of this monument and the "discovery" of many of our modern "diseases".

Other reasons would be the silencing of certain individuals who "knew too much".
Do some research on the backgrounds of the victims.

Why do you continue to say 'blue screeners' = 'no planners'? Have you considered that maybe a plane did hit but you haven't seen the REAL plane because fake evidence has put forth by our cia infested media. Or have you considered that a plane flew by the towers but did not strike them as IOK suggested and once again video/photographic trickery was put forth to make it look like a plane hit the tower?

In my estimation, none of these theories should be ridiculed given the available evidence.

Only south tower "impact" footage taken from the west, that I know of, is a low-res clip supposedly taken by a Japanese tourist. Typically, it is posted with a comment like "Is this a UFO taking off to the left, in the middle of the clip?" - to which the obvious response is "no, it's just a bird" - but NO ONE EVER ASKS "is the impact real?" "could this clip have been altered to erase the plane that really flew off to the left?" "Where is the 'third plane' that can be seen in a CameraPlanet clip, emerging on a north course from behind the north tower?" "are the perps providing clips with SOME reality and SOME fakery, and setting up 'straw man' debates to obscure the REAL 9/11 hoax?"...you know, stuff like that!

I don't believe we need any more evidence than has been generated already to show MOST PEOPLE that the official lies about 9/11 can not possibly be true. As far as I'm concerned, that right there is "success" -- end of phase one.

Now it is time to go on to phase two and three (which we've been doing): That being (1) spreading the word far and wide and (2) forming a real, viable, political COALITION (this is not a right/left issue) that stands in direct OPPOSITION to 9/11 LIES. We have our litmus test: Any politician, bureaucrat, talking head or media that supports the official story can not be trusted or supported and must ultimately be exposed, overthrown and held accountable (Steps four, five and six.)

Now, if Nico can come up with COMPELLING evidence that can be grasped by a mind of average intelligence in FIVE SECONDS or less that proves conclusively that no planes hit the towers, then this can be included in our arsenal of 9/11 truths used to counter the lies.

[On debris blowing in front of WTC 2]
My guess is that the target is being "painted with a laser".

This technology is common with the precision smart bombs used over the last decade.

I have seen this many times and each time I watch it, can find no other explanation.

I do not believe it is faked.

Now, take control of the video progress button and make the plane go in and out of the tower slowly several times and then quickly, all the while paying attention to the relative distance between the main wingtips and the tail wingtips. You'll notice that the distance between the 2 sets of wingtips never changes as the plane enters the tower even thought the wingroots which hold the wings in place have long since been destroyed in the tower. This is an absolute impossibility. This 'collision' or entry into the tower looks totally photoshopped.

Lots of stuff happening before the top falls. Its in reverse to all known properties of physics in this universe....you get the floors popping out before the weight gets down to them. For a natural collapse there sure is lots of debris being ejected.

Why can the public not all we get is someone tell us what is on the flight record? Is there a web site that as this tape. I would like to hear it myself, why is that only plople in the courtroom. No one know who is on the jury. The only preson the media the I have see looks like his readed a script. No one as said nothing about the crash site why is they no plane what so ever there.

scientists are using faith and ignorance themselves when they decide that a phenomena MUST be a natural instance that they don't know about yet.
That's what evolution is basically...

God did not make it logical that there is no God, how can that be?
Ever thought of how information, brain ideas and knowledge came to be?
Everything on earth points to divine creation. And tell me, why would God say in his own bible that he created earth, and then make it logical that there is no God?
Not possible.