(Commenting on Loren Morris, who had sex with a young boy fifty times starting when she was sixteen years old and he was eight.)
a) don’t believe it, looks fake
b) if it did happen, that young man was raping her
case closed
49 comments
For all the idiots that think women can't be sexual predators, here's your proof and my middle finger.
Two years? That's it? She's only getting two years for raping an 8 year old FIFTY TIMES?!
An older, taller, stronger, more developed girl pulls an "Evil Uncle Ernie" on a younger, smaller, weaker, less developed little boy....and HE'S RAPING HER?
So! Has the fearsome were-boar wookalar (from the movie 'Private Eyes') come into your bedroom to suck your brains out through your nose while you sleep or what?!
Well! THIS sure puts a new spin on the whole "Blame The Rape Victim" routine.
I need a shower.....
"Sexselector", indeed. Good to know that there's someone around to decide when the victim of sexual abuse should be considered the perpetrator.
And people wonder where MRAs come from...
a) Here's hoping it's fake, but I won't hold my breath...
b) She was committing statutory rape, as he was too young to give informed consent. Sure, she was barely able to give informed consent herself in the beginning, but still more able than he. Besides, an eight-year-old is not a young man, asshole, it's a CHILD.
Looking up the story, one also notes that she only got a two-year sentence.
Um. What?
Appalling. Just like it would be if a 16-year old male got the same sentence with an eight-year old girl.
b) if it did happen, that young man was raping her
I agree with y... wait? WHAT?!?!
An 8 year old boy CAN'T GIVE CONSENT! And you think he's raping her ?!?! What the fuck is wrong with you!?!
*googles story*
SHE ONLY GOT 2 YEARS!?!?!
I'm mad now! I'm very, very mad!
image
Is selector-chan really trying to defend a child rapist by blaming the child? That's so beyond sick that Ibuki can't even think of a word for it!
And did the rapist really get only two years in jail for this? What's wrong with this world?
She got 2 years because she realized on her own that what she was doing was wrong and stopped without any outside intervention. I don't know if 16 is considred legally adult age in Great Britain, but I believe in the U.S. she would still be considered a minor and this would not count as rape. At least until she turned 18. I suspect it would still fall under some criminal category and she would be required to get counseling, just like any child who has inappropriate, but non-violent contact with another child.
Well...that's sickening.
@MarkB
If a sixteen year old boy raped an eight year old girl fifty times and then "stopped of his own free will" he wouldn't get two years in prison. He'd be locked up for a very, very long time. That this girl is getting off with only two years is revolting, and one of the rare, rare cases where the law is unfairly helpful to female defendants.
A sixteen/eighteen year old having sex with an eight/ten year old is not committing rape, in what world? How can a child that young rape a young adult?
This is just gross. The person this disgraceful rape apologist is responding to who says that feminism supports child rapists is also gross. Yes, lets denounce equality for women by using this case of abuse to foster my anti-woman views! The fundamentalist radfems and anti-feminists are all disgusting people.
What do you call that feeling where you don't know whether to laugh, cry, scream, or punch the OP in the face? That's pretty much where I'm at.
Congratulations on justifying paedophilia. You're now on the same level of evil as Tom Martin.
By the way, sexism test: let's see your reaction if it was a sixteen-year-old guy raping an eight-year-old girl.
@cloningblues, a male teacher (in his 40's or 50's I think) recently got a much lighter sentence than two years for sleeping with a 14 yr old female student. I would guess that a 16 year old boy who stopped of his own free will, provided there was no force / violence involved, would get leniency. Even without it, a juvenile (assuming he's not in a jurisdiction where 16 is considered adult) would get a lighter sentence than an adult. I'm no expert, but it seems logical that you can't charge an underage defendant with statutory rape.
I can't decide if it would be more depressing if sexselector turned out to be an MRA troll, or if she turned out to be a huge idiot.
No one needs to be locked up for life while still a youth, with very, very, few exceptions.
Besides maybe sexselector.
Those saying that she should be locked up for longer than two years are misunderstanding the point of prison.
It is not some revenge for misdeeds. It is designed to separate dangerous people from society, and provide rehabilitation. From what I can see, she was young, she learned her lesson before she was even caught. Two years is a fair sentence. Put people in prison for long periods of time and they are more likely to recommit when they leave. We do not want that!
Just another feminist.
I've given up on NAFALT.
> What do you call that feeling where you don't know whether to laugh, cry, scream, or punch the OP in the face? That's pretty much where I'm at.
It's called shock.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.