[How do you explain dinosaur fossils if there were no dinosaurs?]
I know I've discussed this somewhere before, for one, those Dinosaur fossils are just a few bones they find, then reconstruct what they believe the dinosaur looked like. I think the chances are better they were the same animals around today, maybe a little larger.
41 comments
Yes. Because obviously, with a few chicken bones, a human skeleton, and a crocodile skull, you could create a convincing, uniform fossil of a manticore if you wanted to. It's all up for interpretation, right? And...Frankenstein....frauds...Zionist conspiracy...aliens...the Illuminati...somebody must be up to something...
" ... maybe a little larger"? I dunno, Meya. Some of 'em appear to have been really big. Really, really, really big. Like humongous. Like "holy shit!" Know what I'm saying?
Well if you can find me a fucking T-Rex skull inside a modern animal, maybe I'll consider your theory.
however I probably won't.
I think the chances are better they were the same animals around today, maybe a little larger.
Sure. They evolved feathers and became birds.
those Dinosaur fossils are just a few bones they find, then reconstruct what they believe the dinosaur looked like.
The T. Rex fossil known as "Sue" at the Chicago Field Museum is over 90% complete. The American Museum of Natural History in NY has fossilized dinosaurs with skin on them. There are recent reports of the recovery of protein from a T Rex bone and the possibility of determining the evolutionary position of T Rex through molecular analysis.
Admittedly some, like Hulsanpes, are constructed on very scanty evidence. However, others, like Allosaurus, have had complete skeletons recovered. One funny case is that of Iguanadon, which was reconstructed based on a thumb-bone and skull. The reconstruction was later proved totally wrong by the finding of several complete skeletons.
Oh, on the subject of Iquanadon, that's the kind of thing you, Meya, are talking about: they thought it was just a really, REALLY big iguana.
And you know what? They were wrong. So no, that's not how it works. In fact, you have it completely backwards.
"I think the chances are better they were the same animals around today, maybe a little larger. "
Yeah, they were reptiles and they were FUCKING HUGE.
<img src=http://www.dinostoreus.com/t-rex-skull-lg.jpg >
Tell me, then, where the hell did that come from? Don't know of any modern-day creatures that have a head like that.
Edit: Argh, I fail at inserting pictures. It's a T. Rex skull.
This place needs a 'preview' function >.>
Everyone is entitled to an opinion.
Even a very, very, very stupid one like this.
I know I've discussed this somewhere before, for one, those scriptures are just a few pages they find, then reconstruct what they believe the truth looked like. I think the chances are better they were the same crap around today, maybe a little larger.
fixed
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
