1 5 10 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 30 35 40
Quote# 123291

You are clearly a modern moron. There is no hatred of women in [a rant by caamib that the OP praises as "required reading". Excerpts here]. The hatred is of modern Western culture, and is well deserved since modern Western culture is pure evil.

fschmidt, /r/incels 30 Comments [12/29/2016 4:14:17 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123383

(Pointing out that he is arguing constitutional law with Ambulance Chaser, who is a lawyer)

"Are you aware you're arguing with a lawyer?"

The point?

"Just...why would you, when he's an expert?"

An "expert" at being wrong, lawyers are trained in precedence, not so much in the Constitution - obviously. Try and get passed the authority worship and see things for yourself once.

"How interesting. I am guessing you likewise have no need of airline pilots when you travel as well, since your expertise trumps theirs."

Not in need of airline pilots with training on Cessnas when they are trying to fly a jumbo jet.

"Which you have greater knowledge of than they do. Amazing."

More authority worship.

"No, I just want my plane to be piloted by a man who's been trained to do so. I don't worship the pilot, but I do trust him to be knowledgeable about the field he's been educated in."

Not in need of airline pilots with training on Cessnas when they are trying to fly a jumbo jet.

"And you know the difference, and can fly both. All I'm saying is that if you want me to name a profession that is going to be the most familiar with the constitution, "lawyer" is probably going to be #1 and "religious fundamentalist" is going to be considerably further down the list."




Oboehner, Christian News Network 20 Comments [1/1/2017 2:44:04 PM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Jocasta
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 1843

It seems that after the flood, some of the ocean floors were supernaturally uplifted to form the continents as others sank to form large ocean alleys to catch the waters.

KingDavid, Rapture Ready 7 Comments [12/1/2002 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 1836

And you still dont seem to understand that I do not accept YOUR opinion that humans are primates. Instead I accept God's opinion that humans, although created by the same creator hence the similarities, are God's special creation and seperate from primates.

Rom831, Rapture Ready 5 Comments [12/1/2002 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 1
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 1821

If the [ectopic] pregnancy is endangering the life of the mother than don't you think God can work a miracle if given the chance? Since when is it ok for us decide that "my" life is more important than another's life?

Baptistgal, Christian Forums 22 Comments [12/1/2002 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 1848

learning to survive requires intelligence. A person who is a "vegetable" doesn't possess inteligence. They do not posses the ability to survive. A respiratior can make them breathe, they can be fed by an IV. but they no longer posses the intelligence to survive. So left alone, they'd die. Same with that immaginary first lifeform.

Rom831, Rapture Ready 10 Comments [12/1/2002 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123369

They say that when you sell your soul to the devil (or his earthly minions) for fame and fortune, he eventually comes calling for his payment.

Well, it looks like checkout time came earlier today for Debbie Reynolds, mother of recently-dead Star Wars Kike Carrie Fisher, and I have nothing negative to say about the outcome.

The truth of the matter is that Reynolds long ago made the greed-filled decision to give up her body to lust-crazed Jews in order to obtain preferential treatment in Hollywood through career-boosting promotion.

And for such a defilement of the body and mind without repentance, an eternity of suffering in the afterlife must be the final punishment.

No exceptions.

Marcus Cicero, Infostormer 16 Comments [1/1/2017 11:10:32 AM]
Fundie Index: 10
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123365


He created the English language, it is just men who are not strong on understanding the word of God, especially ATHEIST. :)


Sassy, Religion and Ethics 18 Comments [12/31/2016 11:22:34 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Nearly Sane
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 117358

[Ex-First Lady Nancy Reagan dies at 94]

["Whatever you think, she loved her husband--Sometimes some marriages just work out beautifully-RIP"]

yeah, polluted by evil white racist Reagan sperm.

a2nite, Daily Kos 34 Comments [3/10/2016 6:49:39 PM]
Fundie Index: 13
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123374

Lol it's funny because the same liberal who would say this stuff are the same ones who preach social economic inequality is the cuase of poor people being in poverty. So it's the responsibility of rapists to not be rapists but it's not the responsibility of people to get them selves out of poverty.

Troy Alarie, Facebook 9 Comments [1/1/2017 11:11:57 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 119374

When a person goes to Hell, they are provided with an indestructible body that can feel pain, be tormented, thirst and suffer. Since one's earthly body decomposes in the grave, how could that same body be cast into Hell? Clearly, God provides some type of physical body for people who go to Hell, an indestructible body capable of withstanding extremely high temperatures, capable of thirsting, capable of feeling torment and pain. The Bible says to “FEAR” GOD, who can destroy both soul and body in Hell.

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Precious 44 Comments [5/31/2016 3:45:44 AM]
Fundie Index: 12
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123350

[OP of "So why SHOULDN'T we treat women badly?"]

They have no virtues.

They don't build anything.

They're not sexually or romantically submitting to us as individuals.

Why is it the same normies who can't go five minutes without YOU CAN'T GET LAID.jpg can't muster half of that toward a woman who is nothing but problems?

I'll give you one post to raise a solid defense for women.

Then I'm reporting all your posts.

HookahArtillery, Reddit - r/Incel 12 Comments [12/31/2016 11:19:55 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: JeanP
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 1871

You are just in denial. Snowflakes cannot form by themselves, unless the molecules are specifically designed to allow them to. If you can show me how molecules can form by themselves, then you may have something.

You Betcha, Internet Infidels 14 Comments [12/1/2002 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 11
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 106578

[Extracts from the article The Wicked Westminster Confession - Italics original]

III.7.
"The rest of mankind God was pleased, according to the unsearchable counsel of His own will, whereby He extendeth or withholdeth mercy, as He pleaseth, for the glory of His sovereign power over His creatures, to pass by; and to ordain them to dishonour and wrath for their sin, to the praise of His glorious justice."


In Matthew 11:25-26, Jesus is giving thanks to the Father for hiding the things of the gospel from the wise and prudent and revealing them unto babes. God the Father is said to be doing two things here: hiding from some and revealing to others. It is clear that a supposed "permissive decree" of God is not "expressly set down" in Scripture. Using the WCF's professed principle set forth in I.9, we go to John 12:40 for a fuller and clearer sense of what it means for God to hide these things from the wise and prudent: "He hath blinded their eyes, and hardened their heart; that they should not see with [their] eyes, nor understand with [their] heart, and be converted, and I should heal them."

God actively blinds eyes and hardens hearts. Why? So that they should not see nor understand and be converted. In Matthew 11:25-26, God is not passively hiding things but actively doing so by means of blinding and hardening.

[...]

The Scriptures that the WCF men put forth do not demonstrate that God is passive in His decree of sovereign ordination of the reprobate to wrath. Jude 4 and 1 Peter 2:8 make it clear that the reprobate are ordained and appointed to their respective condemnations. Those who stumbled at the stone of stumbling, those who were offended by the rock of offence, were not "permitted" or "allowed" to appoint themselves. They were appointed by God to stumble at the Word. If God is said to actively cause the reprobate of mankind to stumble at the Stone of stumbling, then will not the carnal response be: "Why doth he yet find fault? For who hath resisted his will?"?

The Scripture says that God raised Pharaoh up in order to display His power in him. How is God's power demonstrated in Pharaoh if God "passes by" him by giving him more freedom and "allowing" him to harden himself? In the Passover found in the book of Exodus, and in the final destruction of Pharaoh in the Red Sea, we see that God raised up Pharaoh (and by extension all the reprobate) in order to show His wrath and to make His power known in His active and unconditional hardening of Pharaoh. The hardening done by God in Pharaoh's heart is shown to be active and efficient because it is a display of His power, and the hardening is shown to be unconditional because God will harden whom He will.

Certainly there are aspects of God's counsel and will that are "unsearchable" (Romans 11:33; Deuteronomy 29: 29) to finite creatures. But God has clearly revealed in His Word exactly WHY He has chosen to have mercy on some and chosen to harden others: God wants to demonstrate His power and wrath in the reprobate so that those to whom He would show mercy might know that the riches of His glorious mercy found in Jesus Christ alone are what makes them to differ from the Pharaohs of the world (Romans 9:22-24).

Chris Duncan, Outside the Camp 27 Comments [2/23/2015 4:31:01 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: JeanP
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 1887

THERE IS NO POSSIBLE WAY THAT WE ARE HERE WITHOUT A CREATOR!!! NONE!! NADA!! This is why I disregard all "advances" in science. Because If scientists are going to leave their brains in the parking lot on the fact that God simply must exist if we exist. then why would they use their brains for anything else. We accuse you of everything you accuse us, including circular reasoning..but just one thing, WE'RE RIGHT!!

inverter, POD Warrior Forum 19 Comments [12/1/2002 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 1885

'True science is the science that agrees with God,and if it goes against the Bible it is wrong' ok that is juss my idea

**~*Max Factor**~*, Thought Cafe 12 Comments [12/1/2002 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 1873

human-- one possessing in high degree the qualities considered distinctive of a man

You Betcha, Internet Infidels 5 Comments [12/1/2002 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 0
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123375

how is that you can make a comment about the male rape victims being ignored when you are making a comment about male victims? And the majority of male victims are raped by other men. Rape is male violence problem. Stop trying to derail every conversation about rape and make it about men being victims!

Jess O'Neill, Facebook 6 Comments [1/1/2017 11:12:47 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123332

Even if you aren't specifically into it, I blame women for the popularity of tabloid magazines and general worship of celebrities.

BouquetofDicks, Reddit 14 Comments [12/30/2016 4:21:45 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123317

Western Sodom pours money upon many who goes public as transgender or homosexual. It's like for women showing more skin. Ex-christian West is worse than a pagan world. They ruin kids to make money.

"What is Western Sodom, and where does it get its wealth from, and what are you talking about?"

Western Sodom is homosexual immorality-wired Western nations and their mimicking mentally-servant nations; their wealth comes from making poor nations work for nothing. The West congratulates immoral people as heroes and encourages coming out as something immoral and rebellious against God. It is observed that God is striking secular nations with childlessness and hopelessness. The land will go to other peoples. The Lord alone knows what will happen to nations, but He decreed severe judgment upon the sinful nations in the Endtime. You need to repent of your sins to get saved. (John chapter3)

Grace Kim Kwon, Christian News Network 13 Comments [12/29/2016 12:00:47 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Jocasta
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 121940

The word rape has various meanings today. Some, like the one which will be about its sane legal definition, are sadly mostly historical in current Western culture, though they still subsist in some saner cultures even today. So what are these definitions?

Sane definition of the act of rape – This definition is also consistent with Common Law (“Carnal knowledge of a woman forcibly and against her will”) and even with evolutionary psychology (“Human copulation resisted by the victim to the best of her ability unless such resistance would probably result in death or serious injury to her or others she commonly protects” is the definition used by Thornhill & Palmer in A Natural History of Rape).

So rape can only be performed by a penis and of course women can’t rape men.

Sane legal definition of rape – Sane legal systems differentiate between act of rape and a crime of rape. A sane legal definition of rape doesn’t believe all acts of rape are crimes of rape. What nonsense would it be to believe that and to treat the whims of some sluts as actually defacing a virgin or a married woman !

A sane legal definition of rape would define rape as a property crime against the woman’s father or husband. Also, rapes against prostitutes should be prosecuted. But it would certainly never account for rapes of sluts, and would consider raping a slut a justified response that should be praised, not persecuted.

Current insane definition of the act/crime of rape – I am saying act/crime of rape because insane modern Western cultures basically don’t differentiate between the act of rape and a crime of rape. In any case, this definition had been, especially since 2000, expanded to include much more than just the actual act of rape. It now includes any form of coercion, inserting objects into sexual orifices, even the insane claim that a woman can rape a male ! There are feminists/liberals insane enough to believe Brock Turner raped some unconscious woman he fingered or that I raped a woman who offered my sex herself in a phone call, simply because I put her picture on my blog when she decided to torture me (as she later admitted herself).

An actual moral definition of rape used by feminists/liberals – this is what almost all feminists and liberals actually see as rape. It is defined as any act a straight white male does to get sex. Asking a woman out by a straight white male is rape to liberals. Going on a date if you’re a straight white male is rape. On the other hand, no actual act of rape, even rape of smallest children, is rape if it is done by Sacred Classes like blacks, Muslims or Hispanics.

I will admit that there are some feminists and liberals who don’t believe so, but these mostly stop calling themselves feminists or liberals once they realize what these ideologies are about.

It is also true that this definition isn’t yet widely used in law but and police officers and judges who don’t use this definition are seen as vermin by liberals and there are places in the West where it’s slowly getting there .

Female definition of rape– Women simply define rape as sex they regret, and pay basically no intention to any other circumstances, including physical pain. So this definition is completely silly and shouldn’t be regarded by anybody sane as anything more than what 5 year-old children think. That some legal systems are starting to bring this definition into equation (though usually by ignoring the sex with a member of Sacred classes females regret) is simply a symptom of a decaying society.

Caamib, CoAlphaAntiModernistIncelBlogger 78 Comments [10/10/2016 2:10:09 AM]
Fundie Index: 24
Submitted By: holly
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123309

[Reminder that the subtitle in the blog header is "Liberty in an unfree world"]

Liberty allows and encourages the highest human flourishing. But when your enemies seek your destruction, it is time for liberty to go.

The time approaches for the warrior ethic, wherein the highest good is to crush your enemies, to see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentations of their women.

It takes two to keep the peace, only one to start war. Every time that Muslims drive a truck into a bunch of Christians, or Black Lives Matter ethnically cleanses the neighborhood of whites and burns down a shopping center, people start panicking “Oh, the terrible white backlash is forcing Muslims and blacks to become radicals.”, though no one has seen any white backlash yet.

The way to respond to war, is with war. History shows us that only war works.

Let us try massacring some peaceful Muslim men and enslaving their women, and see what the effect is on Muslim radicalism. Let us try reenslaving those blacks that are causing the most problems. That would be backlash.

For liberty to exist, there must first be law. For law to exist, there must first be order. For order to exist, there must first be peace. For peace to exist, there must first be victory. And victory usually requires the most horrifying means.

Submitting to your enemy’s war making is not liberty, nor order, nor is it peace.

It is been too long since the last war, people have forgotten how terrible war is, and our enemies have become too used to easy victories, where they make war unopposed, and this war making is answered by generous concessions, which necessarily leads to more extreme war making by our enemies. The only way to real peace, is now through real war.

Jim, Jim's Blog 16 Comments [12/31/2016 11:25:56 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123340

Mobs can be orderly, and the reason that we have a representative republic instead of a democracy (as you pointed out) is because the founders deeply feared democracy as simply orderly mob rule. I might point out that income taxes were declared unconstitutional in 1894. The constitution was amended to add this, because it did not fit the founders plan. If you don’t think the income tax is confiscation at the point of a gun, try not paying it. Men from the government will eventually kick in your door, point at gun to your head and throw you in a cage. What I specifically get motivated about on this subject is people on the left singling out the 1% for hatred, blaming them for all their problems and declaring they pay no taxes. They already pay 50% of all income tax. This especially smacks of brown shirt fascist tactics to jin up hatred as a fuel for power. How is that not mob action? I agree about asset forfeiture without due process. It is wrong and unconstitutional.

I do willingly pay taxes, but still it is taking not giving. It maybe necessary theft at some level, but taking is theft. Spending someone else’s money without their consent is theft. Spending $20 trillion of an unborn generation’s wealth is theft. My primary challenge is to those who believe their calls for higher taxes on the rich are reflections of charity and virtue. Their calls reveal that their own hearts and motivations are theft not charity. Charity is a response from the heart not from fear, intimidation, coercion and force. If the numbers were small and the spending was rational these points would be moot, because few would object. It’s the greed and graft of government, it’s cronies and those who feel entitled to take from others that underlies these objections to taxes. Taxes are the fuel of this greed.

Your analysis of the 1% shows you have no idea how things work. When you reach that level of income the fact is deductions disappear. I don’t care what MSNBC and Bernie’s fantasy narratives are about tax dodges but they are crap. The 1% is who gets audited. They are watched like a hawk by the IRS. The payers often are actually small businesses like S-corps who pay taxes on net income which means income after expenses of creating the income are deducted. So if you sell a house as a builder for $200,000 but there’s $190,000 in labor and materials is your idea of fairness that he pays tax on $200,000 of net revenue or on the $10,000 of profit? It always is on the profit. Deducting cost of revenue is not hiding assets, etc. I’ve prepared a tax return for someone in the 1%; it’s part of what I do in business. Deductions vanish that lower income people can claim. AMT tax appears, new taxes that don’t apply to others in Obamacare magically appear. Don’t believe? Get a copy of Turbotax and just input dummy numbers and see what happens.

You comment about corporate taxes is incorrect. All corps pay a 35% tax. That’s 3.5 out of 10 dollars gone. Then when the corporation distributes the profit of the corp to shareholders it taxes that income a 2nd time. That money is owned by the shareholders and has already been taxed. But just by moving it from one account to another the government grabs more. This double taxation on corporate income raises the rate well over 50% in many cases. It’s higher than almost anywhere in the world and is making US corporations uncompetitive in the world economy. I know the meme’s out their about corps not paying taxes, but dig into any case cited and it’s bullshit. Give me a case, and I will show you.

Sales taxes, fees for service and tolls are optional taxes that can be avoided. They are not confiscatory in a manner like income taxes. Paying the cost of a service is much more likely to make the use of that service fit need rather than want. When costs are socialized demand goes up and supply goes down causing dislocations. When people have to pay for the cost of service they are more likely to make choices that reduce demand or raise supply. Saying such fees are harder on the poor is to suggest that I should stay poor and let daddy pay my bills instead of working harder like I have.

As far as the claim the US is not based on Christian values or is more moral than the Bible tht just seems to be a lack of understanding of history or is the result of being the child of progressive narratives of US history. The US constitution was born in the aftermath of the 1st Great Awakening that saw explosive movements in England and the colonies to deep acceptance of Christian faith. Many of the founders grew up at the feet of some of the great preachers of that time. Ben Franklin was, for instance, close friends with George Whitfield the best known of all 18th century evangelists. Whitfield was a rock star of his age. Even those who were not deep believers were knowledgeable and familiar with the concept of natural law. Perhaps the most foundational new idea of the founders was that rights came from God not man, and that government did not grant rights it protects them. That is why is says in the first amendment, “Congress shall make no law.” It presupposes the right of religion and free speech as naturally flowing from the god of nature.

Covenants are voluntary acts. The writers of the declaration were dedicating to each other their lives, fortunes and sacred honor. There is no more Biblical Christian act than to make willingly such a covenant. “Greater love has no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends.” John 15:13 (most foundational words of Jesus). This all changes when you point a gun at someone and require them to do it. The first act is love the last one is theft. What a moral society does is create the environment where people willingly make such choices. The left does not accept this and believes it must force such choices. This simply leads to envy, hate and division.

1% are hoarders and not charitable? Where do you get this from? Investing is not hoarding. And the 1% are the most charitable among us. How many hospitals, museums, symphonies, food banks, etc would not exist if it were not for their charity and the charity of all else? If capitalism is not moral then what is? Socialism? So capitalism where two parties come to a mutually agreeable exchange that enriches them both is immoral but socialism where one party forcibly takes from the other is moral? In what universe? In a free market the key word is free. No one is forced in an exchange. Each party (buyer/seller) do so voluntarily. I’ve heard it even described as mutually shared altruism.

1%’ers pay 50% of all income taxes paid. The bottom 50% pay zero. So how the hell can you claim or imply that the 1% don’t pay their share? It’s the bottom 50 who don’t pay their share. They get most of the benefits and none of the cost. Most people in poverty in the US have homes with A/C, flat panel TV’s, cell phones, own cars, etc. Your narrative about the poor is something flown in from the 1930’s to inspire a new generation to once again be the power base for tyrants and thugs whose only gift is greed, graft and corruption that result from active community organizing into positions of power over willing dupes who will gladly make them rich for making all of us poorer.

bruce, hecatedemeter 12 Comments [12/30/2016 4:22:57 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123354

We recently hired a new youth leader to our team a few months ago. She has been a believer for 6 years and seems to have zeal for her pursuit of the Lord and in time has formed great relationships with the girls in our group. Recently we had an annual indoor heated pool event for our youth group. The males are required to wear at least a tank top and the girls have to wear at least a one piece or a dark shirt over a two piece. The same rules obviously apply to the leaders. Quite to our surprise this particular leader obeyed in wearing a one piece but it was a thong in the back and extremely revealing so as to call unwanted attention and stumbling for the males and questions from the girls. She defended herself by stating she wasn't doing anything we weren't told to do which seemed like sliding by the rules because of lack of specifics. She doesn't seem to think her actions were wrong and unfortunately it seems we may have to remove her as a leader all because of this incident which will affect the girls she has already bonded with.

Kayla37, Christian Forums 22 Comments [12/31/2016 2:33:27 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 123349

America's law enforcement system has become over-reactive due to the feminist agenda. The police are over-reactive. The courts are over-reactive. Judges are often harsh, cruel and unjust. People often defecate on themselves in the courtroom, because of cruel judges who have no respect for others. Prison sentences are extremely long and unfair. Numerous private prison owners have lobbied lawmakers to greatly lengthen prison sentences, which means much more money for “the system.”

When people no longer care about the Holy Bible, all sense of fairness and doing the right thing are gone! Judges don't fear God, they fear the federal government. Lawyers fear the judges. The entire legal system operates on fear of the government, not fear of God. This is why murderous abortion is legal. This is why wickedly banning the Holy Bible from America's classrooms is legal. This is why same-sex perversion is legal. This is why wickedly quitting one's marriage is legal.

Many men are rethinking marriage these days, deciding that it is not worth the benefit-to-risk ratio. They see their fathers, older brothers, and friends suffering unjustly at the hands of a corrupt court system that caters to feminists. The court system goes after men! Perhaps you say, “Good, men ought to support their children and wife.” Ok, but now what about a man's right to expect his wife to cook, clean and care for the children? What about a man's right to sex on demand? The courts don't enforce a man's right to have a responsible, submissive and obedient wife. If a man works and the wife is at home with the children, she ought to cook for her husband. He has a right to expect a homecooked meal and a clean house. But that's not how the courts see it. The courts view what I just said as a form of domestic abuse!

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Precious 18 Comments [12/31/2016 11:27:13 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
WTF?! || meh
1 5 10 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 30 35 40